alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           49981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2793985
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                193999
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2843966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2831522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2843966
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 72528
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  49583
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              49583
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     49583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.61
        

</TABLE>
### §725. Statement of appropriations; "usual number"

Of the statements of appropriations required to be prepared by section 105 of Title 2,1 there shall be printed, after the close of each regular session of Congress, the usual number of copies.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1252.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §153 (Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 189, §1, 28 Stat. 958).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 105 of Title 2, referred to in text, was editorially reclassified as section 4303 of Title 2, The Congress.

1 So in original. See References in Text note below.
NM 10-130
Cape Flattery WA

1: 250,000

Mafers

DEPTH

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL JO METERS
WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 5 METER CONTOURS
DATUM IS MEAN LOWER LOW WATER

CAPE FLATTERY WASH, US, BC,CAN.
ar

MM 10-10
### **CHAPTER 49—OCEANGOING NON-PASSENGER COMMERCIAL VESSELS**

Sec.
4901.
Surveillance requirements.
Exhibit 99.2



                        Independent Accountant's Report


     Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)
     One Wachovia Center
     301 South College Street, DC-7
     Charlotte, NC 28288

     U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)
     Corporate Trust Department
     100 Wall Street
     New York, NY 10005


     Re:   STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2004-8 (the
           -------------------------------------------------------------------
           "Trust")
           --------

     Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc.
     (the "Depositor") and U.S. Bank National Association, (the "Trustee" and
     Together with the Depositor, the "Management") that the Depositor and the
     Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of
     the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented
     by a series supplement dated as of June 29, 2004 (together, the "Trust
     Agreement"), in respect of the STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group
     Securities, Series 2004-8 (the "Trust"), during the period covered by the
     annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust
     for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Annual Report"). Management is
     responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility
     is to express an opinion on Management's assertions based on our
     examination.

     Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards
     established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
     and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
     Depositor's and the Trustee's compliance with the Trust Agreement and
     performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the
     circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
     basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all
     material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by
     the Annual Report and Management's assertions with respect to such
     compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year
     ended December 31, 2005.


     /s/ Aston Bell, CPA
     New York, New York
     March 16, 2006
### §§682a to 682e. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787

Section 682a, acts June 1, 1938, ch. 317, §1, 52 Stat. 609; July 14, 1945, ch. 298, 59 Stat. 467; June 8, 1954, ch. 270, 68 Stat. 239, related to sale or lease of small tracts for residence, recreation, business, or community site purposes.

Section 682b, act June 1, 1938, ch. 317, §2, as added June 8, 1954, ch. 270, 68 Stat. 239, related to minimum selling price and reservation of mineral rights.

Section 682c, act June 1, 1938, ch. 317, §3, as added June 8, 1954, ch. 270, 68 Stat. 239, related to qualifications of lessees and purchasers.

Section 682d, act June 1, 1938, ch. 317, §4, as added June 8, 1954, ch. 270, 68 Stat. 240, related to sales or leases to employees of Department of the Interior stationed in Alaska.

Section 682e, act June 1, 1938, ch. 317, §5, as added June 8, 1954, ch. 270, 68 Stat. 240, related to application of sections 682a to 682e of this title to certain revested grant lands in Oregon and conditions on lease of such lands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787, provided that the repeal made by section 702 is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, except such effective date to be on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as homestead laws apply to public lands in Alaska.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
§ 881.207 Property standards. Projects must comply with: ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) In the case of congregate or single room occupant housing, the appropriate HUD guidelines and standards;
( c ) HUD requirements pursuant to section 209 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for projects for the elderly or handicapped;
( d ) HUD requirements pertaining to noise abatement and control;
( e ) The Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851-4856), and implementing regulations at part 35, subparts A, B, H, and R of this title; and
( f ) Applicable State and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.
( g ) *Smoke detectors* — ( 1 ) *Performance requirement.* After October 30, 1992, each dwelling unit must include at least one battery-operated or hard-wired smoke detector, in proper working condition, on each level of the unit. If the unit is occupied by hearing-impaired persons, smoke detectors must have an alarm system, designed for hearing-impaired persons, in each bedroom occupied by a hearing-impaired person.
( 2 ) *Acceptability criteria.* The smoke detector must be located, to the extent practicable, in a hallway adjacent to a bedroom, unless the unit is occupied by a hearing-impaired person, in which case each bedroom occupied by a hearing-impaired person must have an alarm system connected to the smoke detector installed in the hallway.
[45 FR 7085, Jan. 31, 1980, as amended at 52 FR 1893, Jan. 15, 1987; 57 FR 33851, July 30, 1992; 63 FR 46578, Sept. 1, 1998; 64 FR 50227, Sept. 15, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RICHARDSON,

Defendant.

Case No. 09-cr-00624-SI-1 

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL 

BRIEFING ON STAY ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 69

Defendant applied to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for authorization to file a second 

or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Dkt. No. 67 at 1-2. This petition was granted. See

Ninth Circuit Case No. 16-71314. In granting the petition, the Ninth Circuit invited this Court to 

stay proceedings pending the resolution of Gardner v. United States, Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-

72559 and Jacob v. United States, Ninth Circuit Case No. 15-73302. The Court accordingly 

stayed the present matter pending the Ninth Circuit’s decisions in these cases. Dkt. No. 69.

On August 1, 2016, the Ninth Circuit lifted the stay in both Gardner and Jacob, and 

transferred these cases back to the district courts in which they originated. Gardner Dkt. No. 42; 

Jacob Dkt. No. 39. Accordingly, the Court now requests briefing from both parties on the 

question of whether the present stay order should remain in place. Specifically the Court requests 

briefing on whether the Court should continue the stay pending the United States Supreme Court’s 

resolution of Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544 (cert. granted June 27, 2016). Briefs of no 

more than 10 pages shall be filed on this question by August 22, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2016

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cr-00624-SI Document 72 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 1
§ 791.406 Competition. ( a ) All budget authority allocated pursuant to § 791.403(b)(2) shall be reserved and obligated pursuant to a competition. Any such competition shall be conducted pursuant to specific criteria for the selection of recipients of assistance. These criteria shall be contained in a regulation promulgated after notice and public comment or, to the extent authorized by law, a notice published in the Federal Register.
( b ) This section shall not apply to assistance referred to in §§ 791.403(b)(1) and 791.407.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1810

JAMES M. CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-519)

Submitted: October 29, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles D. Bennett, Jr., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. James

A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief

Counsel, Robert S. Drum, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the

General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania; Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Joan E.

Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James M. Clark appeals the district court's order adopting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner's decision setting an onset date for award of disability

benefits. We have reviewed the briefs and the administrative

record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Apfel, No. CA-98-519

(E.D. Va. May 18, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IB 

Union Calendar No. 189 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3153 

[Report No. 109–340] 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 

fish recovery implementation programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mrs. CUBIN (for herself, Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. 

MATHESON, Mr. UDALL of New Mexico, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. 

SALAZAR, Mr. CANNON, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Ms. DEGETTE, Mrs. 

MUSGRAVE, Mr. PEARCE, and Mr. TANCREDO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

DECEMBER 13, 2005 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River 

Basin endangered fish recovery implementation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3153 RH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Colorado and 

3 San Juan Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Implementa4 tion Programs Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

5 SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN EN6 DANGERED FISH RECOVERY IMPLEMENTA7 TION PROGRAMS. 

8 Section 3 of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 1602) 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘$46,000,000’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘$61,000,000’’; 

13 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

14 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; 

15 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (b)— 

18 (A) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and in19 serting ‘‘$126,000,000’’; 

20 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

21 (i) by striking $82,000,000’’ and in22 serting ‘‘$108,000,000’’; and 

23 (ii) by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘2010’’; and 

25 (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

26 and inserting ‘‘2010’’; and 
3 

•HR 3153 RH 

1 (3) in subsection (c)(4)— 

2 (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

3 the Elkhead Reservoir enlargement’’ after 

4 ‘‘Wolford Mountain Reservoir’’; and 

5 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

6 ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$31,000,000’’. 
Union Calendar No. 189 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3153 

[Report No. 109–340] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan 

tation programs. River Basin endangered fish recovery implemenDECEMBER 13, 2005 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
§ 81.45 Obtaining and disseminating information. ( a ) The Secretary shall obtain information from other regulatory and enforcement agencies of the Federal Government and State and local governments regarding violations by lenders of the Fair Housing Act, ECOA, and/or State or local fair housing/lending laws, and shall make such information available to the GSEs as the Secretary deems appropriate in accordance with applicable law regarding the confidentiality of supervisory information and the right to financial privacy, and subject to the terms of memoranda of understanding and other arrangements between the Secretary and Federal financial regulators and other agencies. In addition, the Secretary shall make information that the Secretary possesses regarding violations of the Fair Housing Act available to the GSEs.
( b ) As contemplated in paragraph (a) of this section, the Secretary shall obtain information regarding violations by lenders of the Fair Housing Act or ECOA involving discrimination with respect to the availability of credit in a residential real-estate-related transaction from other Federal regulatory or enforcement agencies. The Secretary will obtain information from regulators regarding violations of ECOA by lenders only in circumstances in which there is either more than a single ECOA violation, or the ECOA violation could also be a violation of the Fair Housing Act.
Order entered May 28, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00608-CR

PHILLIP RAMIREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1042390-W

ORDER

We GRANT the State’s May 27, 2014 motion to supplement its brief.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
- Home 

----

                - Table of Contents
                - Chapter 1 - Introduction
                - Chapter 2 - The Astronomical Tide-Producing Forces: General Considerations
                - Chapter 3 - Detailed Explanation of the Differential Tide-Producing Forces
                - Chapter 4 - Variations in the Ranges of the Tides: Tidal Inequalities
                - Chapter 5 - Factors Influencing the Local Heights and Times of Arrival of the Tides
                - Chapter 6 - Prediction of Tides

### Chapter 1 - Introduction

The word "tides" is a generic term used to define the alternating rise and fall in sea level with respect to the land, produced by the gravitational attraction of the moon and the sun. To a much smaller extent, tides also occur in large lakes, the atmosphere, and within the solid crust of the earth, acted upon by these same gravitational forces of the moon and sun. Additional nonastronomical factors such as configuration of the coastline, local depth of the water, ocean-floor topography, and other hydrographic and meteorological influences may play an important role in altering the range, interval between high and low water, an times of arrival of the tides.

The most familiar evidence of the tides along our seashores is the observed recurrence of high and low water - usually, but not always, twice daily. The term tide correctly refers only to such a relatively short-period, astronomically induced vertical change in the height of the sea surface (exclusive of wind-actuated waves and swell); the expression tidal current relates to accompanying periodic horizontal movement of the ocean water, both near the coast and offshore (but as distinct from the continuous, stream-flow type of ocean current).

Knowledge of the times, heights, and extent of inflow and outflow of tidal waters is of importance in a wide range of practical applications such as the following: Navigation through intracoastal waterways, and within estuaries, bays, and harbors; work on harbor engineering projects, such as the construction of bridges, docks, breakwaters, and deep-water channels; the establishment of standard chart datums for hydrography and for demarcation of a base line or "legal coastline" for fixing offshore territorial limits both on the sea surface and on the submerged lands of the Continental Shelf; provision of information necessary for underwater demolition activities and other military engineering uses; and the furnishing of data indispensable to fishing, boating, surfing, and a considerable variety of related water sport activities.
Chapter 2 - The Astronomical Tide-Producing Forces: General Considerations

----
#### § 300.5 Creation and status.

The Association is a Government corporation in the Department of Housing and Urban Development. It is derived from the Federal National Mortgage Association, which was partitioned by the Congress into two corporations effective September 1, 1968, one of which is the Association. The operations of the Association are conducted under its statutory charter contained in title III of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1716, *et seq.*
UMBER

4

IRVINE, CALIFORNIA

/
|
|
|

| Metegorda, TX

DRAWING NUMBER
LM-I9VG

|

PLAN HOLD CORPORATION»

|
i
|

IRVINE, CALIFORNIA

tL —
PLAN HOLD CORPORATION

DRAWING NUMBER
1: 100,000

» IRVINE, CALIFORNIA

DRAWING NUMBER

|

_—_|

CALIFORNIA,

DRAWING NUMBER

= =) = . 0 ro) =)
oS =) ra) =) is) =)
ra) x roe) “ fe) ; oO
Sarat in + a oO . o
Qs s s s ‘ a a)
~ @ x ~ ~ é~ * a)
a) Y \y ws Nt jf > i ae f | |} “ pS =
=) 3 oO
2 \. & aN u Ly
o cS NS) é c Te
cor) 5 : => . (<=) Js or o- ro)
5 Rs ay = ' x a a g —\ 5 0 ‘{ \ Oo c
[a SF \ 4907 5 We) Y
= = = x SS got Se ( > ob
Z x ZT 2 yi we
D> a >
| ba) 2 x-~
} YN
#\ 0 m)
4-4 to > oO
a _ elu 6
7 ! og ¥
- | O68
N \ 44 s = F £&
- \ \ 7 re? 2.0
: AX MOLES “o «28
5 AS ae aecee SA XR Eu 2 3
3 | 2 LA OE
1 | “Al = O 9
| . fo. A ZO
, j ° q /
' - ~ Z 8
| | \
8 8 we © oa
. i
‘ / / & 40 Q
2 B | ; : gk Q
LN . ia a te tN } aX | x
& & 3 : & jg o
Vis \ -
\
. \
. N L .
3% : \
\ ‘ .
\ a \
x i N \ X
=) “ . é
ra) ©
= aa . g \ \ 25
> WS | — . WN 1S
D . ' = vA . \\o
2, \ > 2 \!
\ é 2
\ \ 8
\ 8 q 0 ow
\:
\
\Y 8
= \ ~ \N =)
s) \ ‘
> \ x
8 AoA - ES oT AS :
6 Lows \ Xs . 78 2 29,
| “ ' 3 8 , “9 ye
WAX | > . |
: .
\
2 e t
N .
2 Va
|
= \ 2 qe XS
S Sy
o a _ \ _ - _\ _ —_ “ fa)
fh | \i % 40 «|
o EX: &
\
8 2 <a
A \\ 3 \ . ra
SENG Alea,
\ " 3 & (
: all|\\\ oN Ne
: AMM 6 |
s — .
= i \ a ,
LO \ as
Oe ' a5
| < \ | \ © :
pe if _
[
I 2
_ \
! \ ‘
ro) ae
io) 7 ie ——
tp " s Se
\
® ie
\ (6) a : %
4u . 5 \
a me
. \ %, % z, ne
oN
tag”
TM~
7 Po
ra)
oo St,
& PS
= <> “
2 ia
20,
: oy
pm
“Sa
wa
ae .
oO 3 ’
S ray,
te .
ve)
z Ba
o tS
wl a :
~\
& "
: \
~~
oS \
oS
rm) BS %
Oo - OQ
go. . < os \S \
oo os Oo rom = — Ou
88 28 8 Bere, 3 Se.
r=) < 0 : CG m Rs
go ra oo S © 2
co — / s S Os g
N N wl nN x . S
§ 313.4 Definition of “significant guidance document.” ( a ) A “significant guidance document” is a guidance document that will be disseminated to the general public and that may reasonably be anticipated: ( 1 ) To lead to an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the U.S. economy, a sector of the U.S. economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities;
( 2 ) To create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Federal agency;
( 3 ) To alter materially the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or
( 4 ) To raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in E.O. 12866, as further amended.
( b ) The term “significant guidance document” does not include the categories of documents excluded by § 313.1(c) or any other category of guidance documents exempted by the Agency in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OMB/OIRA).
( c ) Significant guidance documents must be reviewed by OMB/OIRA under E.O. 12866 before issuance; and must demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements for regulations or rules, including significant regulatory actions, set forth in E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, E.O. 13609, E.O. 13771 and E.O. 13777.