alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3073 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3073

To allow Congress to reverse the judgments of the United States Supreme 
                                 Court.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2005

Mr. Lewis of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To allow Congress to reverse the judgments of the United States Supreme 
                                 Court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Accountability for 
Judicial Activism Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL REVERSAL OF SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS.

    The Congress may, if two thirds of each House agree, reverse a 
judgment of the United States Supreme Court--
            (1) if that judgment is handed down after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) to the extent that judgment concerns the 
        constitutionality of an Act of Congress.

SEC. 3. PROCEDURE.

    The procedure for reversing a judgment under section 2 shall be, as 
near as may be and consistent with the authority of each House of 
Congress to adopt its own rules of proceeding, the same as that used 
for considering whether or not to override a veto of legislation by the 
President.

SEC. 4. BASIS FOR ENACTMENT.

    This Act is enacted pursuant to the power of Congress under article 
III, section 2, of the Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


_____________________________________


FORM 8-K


____________________________________





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 11, 2018  (May 8, 2018)


_____________________________________








NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


_____________________________________


Delaware1-961836-3359573(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)(Commission File No.)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


2701 Navistar DriveLisle, Illinois60532(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (331) 332-5000


_____________________________________


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)


_____________________________________





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging Growth Company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐











1


---







ITEM 5.02 DEPARTURE OF DIRECTORS OR CERTAIN OFFICERS; ELECTION OF DIRECTORS; APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN OFFICERS; COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF CERTAIN OFFICERS


On May 8, 2018, Navistar International Corporation (the “Company”) received notification that Matthias Gründler intends to resign from the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company on a future date.  Mr. Gründler’s decision was not in connection with any disagreement with the Company pertaining to the Company’s strategy, operations, policies or practices.





2


---







SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION(Registrant)


By:/s/ Richard E. BondName:Richard E. BondTitle:Corporate Secretary





Dated: May 11, 2018





3
Certification

I, John M. Gordon, a Vice President in the Asset Backed Services, Treasury Activities Department of Wachovia Bank,
National Association, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or
servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Wachovia Asset Securitization Issuance, LLC 2004-HE1.2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.Date: March 31, 2005By: /s/ John Gordon
Name: John Gordon
Title: Vice President
Company: Wachovia Bank, National Association
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-21202

Summary Calendar

 

DEXTER ARTHUR JACKSON

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

JOE FERNAULD, WYNNE UNIT MEDICAL STAFF, PAUL M MOORE,

DOUG DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL

BRANCH, GARY MOHR, STEPHEN MARTIN, LLOYD ASCHBERGER, JENNY

ABRAHAM, WALTER ZALENSKI, III, JOANNA ALFORD, JOHN DOE, JAMES

WESTMORELAND, JOHN SEALY HOSPITAL

Defendants - Appellees

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CV-609

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dexter Arthur Jackson, former Texas prisoner number 565215,

filed the instant § 1983 suit to seek redress for, inter alia,

the defendants’ alleged indifference to his serious medical needs

while he was incarcerated. Jackson argues that district court

erred in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment

because they failed to treat his broken thumb properly and
No. 03-21202

-2-

promptly. Jackson’s allegations amount to no more than

assertions of negligence, malpractice, and failure to provide

additional treatment. These allegations are insufficient to show

deliberate indifference. See Domino v. Texas Dep’t. of Criminal

Justice, 239 F.3d 752, 755 (5th Cir. 2001); Stewart v. Murphy,

174 F. 3d 530, 534 (5th Cir. 1999); Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d

320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Jackson’s argument that the district

court should not have granted summary judgment in the absence of

affidavits is unavailing. Jackson has not shown that the

district court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for

summary judgment and dismissing his suit. 

Jackson also has not shown that the district court abused

its discretion in relation to discovery. See Karaha Bodas Co.,

LLC. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara, 364

F.3d 274, 304-05 (5th Cir. 2004); King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346

(5th Cir. 1994). Jackson has not shown that he made any

discovery requests that were denied, nor has he identified any

particular documents that he wished to obtain through discovery. 

The judgment of the lower court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 289 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.289

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
8200 South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the ``Sergeant 
            First Class John Marshall Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8200 
South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant First Class John Marshall Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant First Class John 
Marshall Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §30909. Security

Neither the United States nor a federally-owned corporation may be required to give a bond or admiralty stipulation in a civil action under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1519.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30909 | 46 App.:743 (last sentence). | Mar. 9, 1920, ch. 95, §3 (last sentence), 41 Stat. 526; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(25)(A), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 155. |

Section

The words "civil action" are substituted for "proceeding" for consistency in this chapter and with rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.).
§ 266.646 Determining the amount of loss. The amount of the total loss to be shared by HUD and the HFA is equal to: ( a ) The amount of the initial claim payment;
( b ) Plus all items set forth in § 266.648; and
( c ) Less all items set forth in § 266.650.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-22-00444-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 96th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 096-335857-22

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

OMAR APOLO JACOBO, Appellant

V.

JOHN M. MARTIN FWPD BADGE 4112 (FORT WORTH POLICE 

DEPARTMENT), Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 23, 2023 and April 10, 2023, we notified appellant that he did not

comply with certain Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and requested that appellant file 

an amended brief that complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 9.4, 38.1, and 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1. We stated that 

we may strike appellant’s brief and dismiss the appeal unless, within ten days, 

appellant filed with the court an amended brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a), 

42.3. We have received no response.

Because appellant has failed to file an amended brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to do so, we strike appellant’s brief and dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: May 18, 2023
§ 570.485 Making of grants. ( a ) *Required submissions.* In order to receive its annual CDBG grant under this subpart, a State must submit a consolidated plan in accordance with 24 CFR part 91. That part includes requirements for the content of the consolidated plan, for the process of developing the plan, including citizen participation provisions, for the submission date, for HUD approval, and for the amendment process.
( b ) *Failure to make submission.* The state's failure to make the submission required by paragraph (a) of this section within the prescribed deadline constitutes the state's election not to receive and distribute amounts allocated for its nonentitlement areas for the applicable fiscal year. Funds will be either: ( 1 ) Administered by HUD pursuant to subpart F of this part if the state has not administered the program in any previous fiscal year; or
( 2 ) Reallocated to all states in the succeeding fiscal year according to the formula of section 106(d) of the Act, if the state administered the program in any previous year.
( c ) *Approval of grant.* HUD will approve a grant if the State's submissions have been made and approved in accordance with 24 CFR part 91, and the certifications required therein are satisfactory to the Secretary. The certifications will be satisfactory to the Secretary for this purpose unless the Secretary has determined pursuant to § 570.493 that the State has not complied with the requirements of this subpart, or has determined that there is evidence, not directly involving the State's past performance under this program, that tends to challenge in a substantial manner the State's certification of future performance. If the Secretary makes any such determination, however, the State may be required to submit further assurances as the Secretary may deem warranted or necessary to find the grantee's certification satisfactory.
( d ) *Specific conditions.* —HUD may impose additional specific award conditions on States in accordance with 2 CFR 200.207.
[57 FR 53397, Nov. 9, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 1916, Jan. 5, 1995; 61 FR 54922, Oct. 22, 1996; 80 FR 69871, Nov. 12, 2015]
PUBLIC LAW 110–170—DEC. 26, 2007 121 STAT. 2465 

Public Law 110–170 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to modify the program for the sanctuary 

system for surplus chimpanzees by terminating the authority for the removal 

of chimpanzees from the system for research purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chimp Haven is Home Act’’. 

SEC. 2. SANCTUARY SYSTEM FOR SURPLUS CHIMPANZEES; TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY FOR REMOVAL FROM SYSTEM FOR 

RESEARCH PURPOSES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The first section 481C of the Public Health 

Service Act (42 U.S.C. 287a–3a) (added by section 2 of Public 

Law 106–551) is amended in subsection (d)— 

(1) in paragraph (2), in subparagraph (J), by striking ‘‘If 

any chimpanzee is removed’’ and all that follows; and 

(2) in paragraph (3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (A)— 

(i) by striking clause (ii); and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘except as provided’’ in the matter 

preceding clause (i) and all that follows through 

‘‘behavioral studies’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘except that the chimpanzee may be used for 

noninvasive behavioral studies’’; 

(B) by striking subparagraph (B); 

(C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B); and 

(D) in subparagraph (B) (as so redesignated), by 

striking ‘‘under subparagraphs (A) and (B)’’ and inserting 

‘‘under subparagraph (A)’’. 

42 USC 201 note. 

Chimp Haven is 

Home Act. 

Dec. 26, 2007 

[S. 1916] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
121 STAT. 2466 PUBLIC LAW 110–170—DEC. 26, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1916: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 19, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Part E of title IV of the Public 

Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is amended by redesignating the second section 481C (added by section 204(a) of Public 

Law 106–505) as section 481D. 

Approved December 26, 2007. 

42 USC 287a–4. 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
EXHIBIT 31.1I, JasonLiddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports onForm 8- K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect ofperiods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill LynchDepositor, Inc., on behalf of PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2;     2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as awhole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of thelast day of the period covered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing informationrequired to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling andservicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included inthese reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by thedepositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreementand based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under thatagreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trusteehave each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and     5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to thecompliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicing or similarstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the poolingor servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York andits officers and agents.        Date:  March 26, 2007 /s/ JasonLiddell   Vice President
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2890

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,8 Naphthalamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,8 Naphthalamide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 1,8 NAPHTHALAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.02 1H Benz(de) isoquinoline 

1,3 (2H) Dione (CAS No. 

81–83–4) (provided for in 

subheading 2925.19.42) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2890 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### N. Simon et al., appellees, v. Cornelius T. Allen, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,805.

Action of forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for possession by plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Howard Hayes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Nichols & Nelson, for appellant. Harold A. Fein, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 9, 2016

Order 

Clerk

March 9, 2016

152875

ASSOCIATED CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 152875

v COA: 320717

Oakland CC: 2009-097554-CK

COMMERCE 8800, LLC, CRYSTAL

HALLEY, Trustee of the HARPER H.

CUNNINGHAM & SALLY ANN

CUNNINGHAM TRUST, and REPUBLIC

BANK, Defendants, and

JIMM F. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
§ 586.15 Waivers and extensions of deadlines. ( a ) After consultation with the LRA and HUD, and upon a finding that it is in the interest of the communities affected by the closure/realignment of the installation, DoD, through the Director of the Office of Economic Adjustment, may extend or postpone any deadline contained in this part.
( b ) Upon completion of a determination and finding of good cause, and except for deadlines and actions required on the part of DoD, HUD may waive any provision of §§ 586.20 through 586.45 in any particular case, subject only to statutory limitations.