alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 233 (Thursday, December 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78148-78149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26626]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery 
Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 26, 2020, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Subcutaneous Drug 
Development & Delivery Consortium, Inc. (``Subcutaneous Drug 
Development & Delivery Consortium, Inc.'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the 
venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identity of the parties to 
the venture are: Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN; Halozyme, 
Inc., San Diego, CA; Bristol Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, NJ; 
AstraZeneca, San Francisco, CA; and Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA. The 
general area of Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, 
Inc.'s planned activity is (a) transform patient care and improve 
patient outcomes by identifying and addressing key gaps, unmet needs 
and actionable issues in the dynamic subcutaneous (``SC'') drug 
delivery and development landscape, including through research, 
publication of industry analyses, and the

[[Page 78149]]

development of SC-related manuscripts, models, standards and other 
guidance materials (collectively, ``Guidance''); (b) provide a venue 
for reviewing, developing, maintaining and supporting the Guidance; (c) 
promote the Guidance worldwide; (d) provide for testing and conformity 
assessment of implementations in order to ensure and/or facilitate 
compliance with Guidance; (e) operate a branding program based upon 
distinctive trademarks to create high customer awareness of, demand 
for, and confidence in the Guidance, and products or services designed 
in compliance therewith; and (f) undertake such other activities as may 
from time to time be appropriate to further the purposes and achieve 
the goals set forth above.
    Membership in Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery Consortium, 
Inc. remains open and Subcutaneous Drug Development & Delivery 
Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-26626 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
### Spatial database of mining-related features in 2001 at selected phosphate mines, Bannock, Bear Lake, Bingham, and Caribou Counties, Idaho

By: Phillip R. MoyleHelen Z. Kayser

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds223

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
### §366a. Effect of Internal Revenue Code

The provisions of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, as herein amended, shall be in full force and effect notwithstanding the enactment of the Internal Revenue Code.

(June 20, 1939, ch. 227, §22, 53 Stat. 848.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 680, 52 Stat. 1094, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 367 of this title and Tables.

The Internal Revenue Code, referred to in text, probably means the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, which was generally repealed by section 7851 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, Title 26. The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was redesignated the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095. For table of comparisons of the 1939 Code to the 1986 Code, see Table I preceding section 1 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code. See also section 7852(b) of Title 26 for provision that references in any other law to a provision of the 1939 Code, unless expressly incompatible with the intent thereof, shall be deemed a reference to the corresponding provision of the 1986 Code.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act which comprises this chapter.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of IASIS Healthcare LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                           /s/ David R. White
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          David R. White
                                          Chairman of the Board
                                          and Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ W. Carl Whitmer
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          W. Carl Whitmer
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Dated: December 23, 2005
#### § 880.605 Overcrowded and underoccupied units.

If the contract administrator determines that because of change in family size an assisted unit is smaller than appropriate for the eligible family to which it is leased, or that the unit is larger than appropriate, housing assistance payments with respect to the unit will not be reduced or terminated until the eligible family has been relocated to an appropriate alternative unit. If possible, the owner will, as promptly as possible, offer the family an appropriate unit. The owner may receive vacancy payments for the vacated unit if he complies with the requirements of § 880.611.
#### § 241.550 Accumulation of next premium.

The security instrument shall provide for payments by the borrower to the lender on each interest payment date of an amount sufficient to accumulate in the hands of the lender one payment period prior to its due date, the next annual insurance premium payable by the lender to the Commissioner.
### §718. Lapse of authority to print

The authority to print a document or report, or a publication authorized by law to be printed, for distribution by Congress, shall lapse when the whole number of copies has not been ordered within two years from the date of the original order, except orders for subsequent editions, approved by the Joint Committee on Printing, in which case the whole number may not exceed that originally authorized by law.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1250.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §141 (Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2284, §5, 34 Stat. 1014).
### Regulatory Evaluation 

# '1

# 0' l(- 

# C

# t- 0 

# IS - i} f) Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 

## -AD

J(voumake dumgc!s 1o !he 

### values i11 !he 

### fahle he/ow. you nmsf t!JJ.wre 

### tile lo!als upda!e acc:urding,ly. (/ 1/ie y c/o nul, click (or Tah) i1110 aud 1he11 o w <![fhf! 

### dwnged cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft , engine, propeller, appliance) (e.g., Inspection, Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost

replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s . for U.S. Fleet Do no/ include oncondition cosrs here access, testi ng , (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Replacement 30.0 $575 ' :, 

### 847 • I



# . I I ,··· o 

### no .• 

### ' d ·· Ill 

### ' ·' 

## " ' '

**0~1** -; (),II(' ... I f1,J ' I \ (' l ji) j . '* 

# ... ..

' I ' • •: ' !: '. 

# . .. \ II Il l•

**~** (I {If) I • '

**'** '• (

**,~**
**,**

**~),01**

**I~ ;,**  **·,** • • lj,

**~** ' ' I. I o; ' '· (1 ' , · I ' 'i 

# . . . ;; · . ' I· ' • ' ' · I ; :: j
,

**~ ~**  t= J 11 U ti ' ' t J,t '·! '· 1 l, f•

**~'** nd , _ i' :: , :t c, '':1 

### ., 

# . . The 

### known number of 

### products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fleet : $2,646,875 Costs 

### covered under warranty (if 

### known) $ On-Condition Co sts: 

# 9 Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost pe r Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access , (@$85/hour) testing. and c lose- replacement) up)

., .} q\ I 

### .. n,q •' I ' : • ' , 

### ' d; , 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis

**(U~e** !hi sfield to explain anything in !he Estimared Cosrs !able !hat

**wa.~** assumed or mighr not be obvious. This field can also h e

**u.~ed** ro explain warranty cost s): 

### 7

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "sign ificant regulatory



# action **"?~**

**·** YES* 

# 0

**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulator-y Policies and Procedur es: Is 

### the AD significant? 

# Q . YES* 

# 0 NO 

## 18] *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility 

### Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on 

### a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer .• YESO

**NO~** 

### Explanation : Cost is not considered significant. 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -YES* 

# 0

**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### All aircraft must 

### be applicable regardless ofloaction



### 8
EXHIBIT 32.2

INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas J. Tossavainen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|/s/THOMAS J. TOSSAVAINENThomas J. Tossavainen Chief Financial
OfficerFebruary 26, 2008 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Case 3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document 56 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document55 Filed02/26/10 Page1 of 18
Case 3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document 56 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document55 Filed02/26/10 Page2 of 18
Case3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document55 Filed02/26/10 Page3 of 18

April 30, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. March 1, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document 56 Filed 03/01/10 Page 3 of 3
(April 20, 1962)

#### Berry Baker v. Stephen Baker.

Motion for a stay granted on condition that the defendant make weekly support payments at the rate of $120 per week during the pendency of the appeal, and upon the further condition that the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before April 23, 1962, with notice of argument for May 1, 1962, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Respondent’s points are to be served and filed on or before April 27, 1962. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
§ 574.420 Cooperation. ( a ) The grantee shall agree, and shall ensure that each project sponsor agrees, to cooperate and coordinate in providing assistance under this part with the agencies of the relevant State and local governments responsible for services in the area served by the grantee for eligible persons and other public and private organizations and agencies providing services for such eligible persons.
( b ) A grantee that is a State shall obtain the approval of the unit of general local government in which a project is to be located before entering into a contract with a project sponsor to carry out an activity authorized under this part.
( c ) A grantee that is a city receiving a formula allocation for an EMSA shall coordinate with other units of general local government located within the metropolitan statistical area to address needs within that area.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 313 

To provide grants to States to combat methamphetamine abuse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. BLUNT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide grants to States to combat methamphetamine 

abuse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exile Meth Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF GRANT PROGRAM FOR COM6 BATING METHAMPHETAMINE REPEAT OF7 FENDERS. 

8 The Attorney General shall establish a program that 

9 provides grants to qualified States for combating the prob10 lem of methamphetamine abuse, with a specific focus on 

11 the prosecution of repeat offenders. 
2 

•HR 313 IH 

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITION. 

2 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘qualified State’’ means 

3 a State that— 

4 (1) had more than 200 methamphetamine lab 

5 seizures in 2004, as reported by the National Clan6 destine Laboratory Database; and 

7 (2) has a law that provides that a person who 

8 possesses or distributes 5 grams or more of meth9 amphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its iso10 mers, or 50 grams or more of a mixture or sub11 stance containing a detectable amount of meth12 amphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its iso13 mers, qualifies for a mandatory minimum sentence, 

14 without the possibility of probation or parole, of 5 

15 to 40 years for a first offense, 10 years to life for 

16 a second offense, and life for a third offense. 

17 SEC. 4. DISTRIBUTION OF GRANT AMOUNTS. 

18 The Attorney General shall distribute grants author19 ized under this Act to 2 States. 

20 SEC. 5. ADMINISTRATION. 

21 The Attorney General shall prescribe requirements, 

22 including application requirements, for grants under the 

23 program established under this Act. 
3 

•HR 313 IH 

1 SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be appro3 priated $10,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 and 

4 2007 to carry out this Act. 

5 (b) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts appropriated pursuant 

6 to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) 

7 shall remain available until expended. 

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1

William E. Kennedy (CSB #158214)

LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM E. KENNEDY

2797 Park Avenue, Suite 201

Santa Clara, California 95050

(408) 241-1000 phone

(408) 241-1500 fax

willkennedy@pacbell.net

Chris Brancart (CSB #128475)

BRANCART & BRANCART

P. O. Box 686

Pescadero, CA 94060

(650) 879-0141 phone

(650) 879-1103 fax

cbrancart@brancart.com

Noah Zinner (CSB #247581)

HOUSING AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS ADVOCATES

P.O. Box 29435 

Oakland, CA 94604-0091

(510) 271-8443 phone

nzinner@heraca.org

Attorneys for Plaintiff MERCEDES HERRERA and others similarly situated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

__________________________________________

MERCEDES HERRERA

Plaintiff,

vs.

LCS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC, 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.:C09-02843 TEH

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO

APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Date: February 22, 2010

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Courtroom 12

Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

Case 3:09-cv-02843-TEH Document 46 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2

Good cause existing, the Court hereby grants plaintiff’s request for permission to appear

at the Case Management Conference by telephone scheduled for February 22, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: _____________ ___________________________________________

United States District Judge

Honorable Thelton E. Henderson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

02/22/10

Case 3:09-cv-02843-TEH Document 46 Filed 02/22/10 Page 2 of 2
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post

- consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

March 29, 2011

Mr. John A. Benedict, Director Division of Air Quality West Virginia Department of Environ mental Protection 601 57 th Street, SE Charleston, West Virginia 25304

Dear Mr. Benedict:

On June 3 , 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the heath

based National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) by es tablishing a new 1

- hour standard at a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb). This new 1

- hour standard will protect public health by reducing people’s exposure to high short

- term (5

- minutes to 24

- hours) concentrations of SO 2 . An area meets the new standard when the 3

- year average of the 99 th percentile of 1

- hour daily maximum concentrations does not exceed 75 ppb.

Section 107(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) describes the process EPA follows for designating areas as meeting or not meeting a new or revised NAAQS. Within one year of establishing a new or revised standard, each governor must recommend a designation of attainment, nonattainment or unclassifiable, with appropriate boundaries, for areas within their jurisdiction. Therefore, we ask that your st ate provide designation recommendations, including appropriate area boundaries, for all areas by June 3, 2011, with respect to the 1

- hour SO 2 NAAQS.

The enclosed memorandum provides guidance to state and local air pollution control agencies and tribes on the timeline and process for designating areas under the revised SO 2 standard. We plan to announce our intended designations no later than 120 days prior to promulgating final designations. Following the announcement of intended designations, states

a nd tribes will have the opportunity to comment on any modifications EPA proposes to their recommendations. EPA intends to complete designations by no later than June 3, 2012.Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post

- consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 Establishing area designations is a key step in the process of providing t he health protection intended by the CAA

. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or have your staff contact Ms. Irene Shandruk at (215) 814

- 2166 or Ms. Ruth Knapp at (215) 814

- 2191.

Sincerely,

/s/

Diana Esher, Director Air Protec tion Division

Enclosure

cc: Mr. Fred Durham , Assistant Director, Planning Division of Air Quality, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of CEO and CFO


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
A. Milton, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
and Brian Dunne, as Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




/s/
      Robert A. MiltonBy:
              Robert
      A. MiltonTitle:
              Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
      31, 2008/s/
      Brian DunneBy:
              Brian
      DunneTitle:
              Executive
      Vice-President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      31, 2008




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 75.17 Contract provisions. ( a ) PHAs or other recipients must include language in any agreement or contract to apply Section 3 to contractors.
( b ) PHAs or other recipients must require contractors to include language in any contract or agreement to apply Section 3 to subcontractors.
( c ) PHAs or other recipients must require all contractors and subcontractors to meet the requirements of § 75.9, regardless of whether Section 3 language is included in contracts.
#### § 891.300 Applicability.

The requirements set forth in this subpart C apply to the Section 811 Program of Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities only, and to applicants, Sponsors, and Owners under that program.
§ 28.45 Settlements. ( a ) HUD and the respondent may enter into a settlement agreement at any time prior to the issuing of a notice of final determination under § 26.50 of this title.
( b ) Failure of the respondent to comply with a settlement agreement shall be sufficient cause for resuming an action under this part, or for any other judicial or administrative action.
### §30904. Exclusive remedy

If a remedy is provided by this chapter, it shall be exclusive of any other action arising out of the same subject matter against the officer, employee, or agent of the United States or the federally-owned corporation whose act or omission gave rise to the claim.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1518.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30904 | 46 App.:745 (1st proviso). | Mar. 9, 1920, ch. 95, §5 (1st proviso), 41 Stat. 526; June 30, 1932, ch. 315, 47 Stat. 420; Dec. 13, 1950, ch. 1136, 64 Stat. 1112. |

Section

The words "officer, employee, or agent of the United States or the federally-owned corporation" are substituted for "agent or employee of the United States or of any incorporated or unincorporated agency thereof" for consistency in this chapter and to eliminate unnecessary words.