alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 105-84]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-84
_______________________________________________________________________

                   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF
 
       HOUSE RESOLUTION 129, THE COMMITTEE FUNDING RESOLUTION

                                _______
                                

   April 30, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 136]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 136, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of House 
Resolution 129, the ``Committee Funding Resolution'' under a 
closed rule. The rule provides 1 hour of general debate divided 
equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on House Oversight. The rule provides for 
consideration in the House without the intervention of any 
point of order. It provides that the committee amendment in the 
nature of a substitute will be considered as adopted. Finally, 
the rule provides for one motion to recommit.

                                

```
#### § 236.13 Change in agreements.

No Noteholder will consent to any change or waiver of any provision of any document contemplated by the Guarantee without the prior written consent of USAID.
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 118 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 118 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 118 Filed 06/15/10 Page 3 of 3
### **CHAPTER 541—MISCELLANEOUS**

Sec.
54101.
Assistance for small shipyards.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior chapter 541, Miscellaneous, consisting of section 54101 and relating to assistance for small shipyards and maritime communities, added by Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3523(a)(6)(A), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 599, was repealed by Pub. L. 110–417, div. C, title XXXV, §3508(b), Oct. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 4769, as amended by Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title X, §1073(c)(14), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2475, effective Oct. 14, 2008, and as if included in Pub. L. 110–417 as enacted.

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. C, title XXXV, §3514(h), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 811, amended chapter analysis generally, reenacting heading and item 54101 without change and inserting a period after "Sec".

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. C, title XXXV, §3507(b)(1), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4405, struck out item 54102 "Centers of excellence for domestic maritime workforce training and education".

**2017**—Pub. L. 115–91, div. C, title XXXV, §§3505(b), 3507(b), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1914, 1915, substituted "Assistance for small shipyards" for "Assistance for small shipyards and maritime communities" in item 54101 and added item 54102.
§ 70.5 Procedure for obtaining HUD waiver of prevailing wage rates for volunteers. ( a ) This section applies to those HUD programs under which HUD is statutorily authorized to *waive* prevailing wage requirements for volunteers, as referenced in § 70.1(b).
( b ) Local or State agencies or private parties whose employees are otherwise subject to prevailing wage rates and which wish to use volunteers shall request a waiver of prevailing wage requirements from HUD for the volunteers. A request for waiver shall indicate that the proposed volunteers are volunteering their services for the purposes of lowering the costs of construction. The request shall include information sufficient for HUD to make a determination, as required by statute, that any amounts saved through the use of volunteers are fully credited to the corporation, cooperative, or public body or agency undertaking the construction and a determination that any payments to volunteers meet the criteria in section 70.3(b). Information regarding the crediting of amounts saved is required in order to insure that the statutorily prescribed purpose of lowering the costs of construction is fulfilled by passing savings from the use of volunteers on to the sponsor or other body or agency undertaking the construction, rather than permitting the retention of any savings as a windfall by a contractor or subcontractor. A written waiver shall be provided to the requestor by the Department within ten days of receipt by the Department of sufficient information to meet the requirements for a waiver.
( c ) For a project covered by prevailing wage rate requirements in which all the work is to be done by volunteers and there are no paid construction employees, the local or State funding agency (or, if none, the entity that employs the volunteers) shall record in the pertinent project file the name and address of the agency sponsoring the project, the name, location, and HUD project number (if any) of the project, the number of volunteers, and type of work and hours of work they performed. The entity responsible for recording this information shall provide a copy of the information to HUD.
( d ) For a project covered by prevailing wage rate requirements in which there is to be a mix of paid workers and volunteers, the local or State funding agency (or, if none, the entity responsible for generating certified payrolls) shall provide HUD the information in (c) of this section, along with the names of the proposed volunteers.
### §1745. Disclaimer of interest in lands

#### (a) Issuance of recordable document; criteria

After consulting with any affected Federal agency, the Secretary is authorized to issue a document of disclaimer of interest or interests in any lands in any form suitable for recordation, where the disclaimer will help remove a cloud on the title of such lands and where he determines (1) a record interest of the United States in lands has terminated by operation of law or is otherwise invalid; or (2) the lands lying between the meander line shown on a plat of survey approved by the Bureau or its predecessors and the actual shoreline of a body of water are not lands of the United States; or (3) accreted, relicted, or avulsed lands are not lands of the United States.

#### (b) Procedures applicable

No document or disclaimer shall be issued pursuant to this section unless the applicant therefor has filed with the Secretary an application in writing and notice of such application setting forth the grounds supporting such application has been published in the Federal Register at least ninety days preceding the issuance of such disclaimer and until the applicant therefor has paid to the Secretary the administrative costs of issuing the disclaimer as determined by the Secretary. All receipts shall be deposited to the then-current appropriation from which expended.

#### (c) Construction as quit-claim deed from United States

Issuance of a document of disclaimer by the Secretary pursuant to the provisions of this section and regulations promulgated hereunder shall have the same effect as a quit-claim deed from the United States.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title III, §315, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2770.)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SendTec, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald Gould, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Donald Gould             
|Donald Gould                 
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
|March 29, 2007
§ 290.39 Nondiscrimination in admitting certificate and voucher holders. ( a ) *Nondiscrimination requirement.* For any mortgage described in paragraphs (c) or (d) of this section that HUD sells without FHA mortgage insurance, the project owner shall not unreasonably refuse to lease a dwelling unit offered for rent, offer to sell cooperative stock, or otherwise discriminate in the terms of tenancy or cooperative purchase and sale because any tenant or purchaser is a voucher holder under 24 CFR part 982.
( b ) *Inapplicability to current mortgages securing unsubsidized projects that receive no project based-assistance.* The nondiscrimination requirements of this section do not apply to any mortgage that is current under the terms of the mortgage at the time HUD offers it for sale, if the mortgage secures an unsubsidized project that does not receive any of the forms of project-based assistance enumerated in paragraphs (4)(i) to (4)(iv) of the “subsidized project” definition in § 290.3.
( c ) *Applicability to mortgages securing unsubsidized projects receiving project-based assistance (partially-assisted projects) or securing subsidized projects.* ( 1 ) The nondiscrimination requirement in paragraph (a) of this section applies to the project owner upon the sale of a mortgage without FHA mortgage insurance if, at the time HUD offers it for sale, the mortgage secures: ( i ) An unsubsidized project that receives any of the forms of assistance enumerated in paragraphs (4)(i) to (4)(iv) of the “subsidized project” definition in § 290.5; or
( ii ) A subsidized project, as defined in § 290.3.
( 2 ) This requirement shall continue in effect until the mortgage debt is satisfied.
( d ) *Covenant requirement for all delinquent mortgages sold without FHA mortgage insurance.* This paragraph (d) applies to the sale of any mortgage that is delinquent at the time HUD offers it for sale without FHA mortgage insurance, without regard to the subsidy status of the project. The mortgage purchaser and its successors and assigns shall require the mortgagor to record a covenant running with the land as part of any loan restructuring or final compromise of the mortgage debt and shall include a covenant in any foreclosure deed executed in connection with the mortgage. The covenant shall set forth the nondiscrimination requirement in paragraph (a) of this section. The covenant shall continue in effect until a date that is the same as the maturity date of the mortgage sold by HUD.
[61 FR 11685, Mar. 21, 1996; 61 FR 19188, May 1, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 32265, June 21, 1996; 89 FR 38291, May 7, 2024]
### §503. "Unusual or emergency conditions" defined

The term "unusual or emergency conditions", as used in section 502 of this title, shall be construed to mean canal bank failures, generator failures, damage to transmission lines; or other physical failures or damage, or acts of God, or of the public enemy, fires, floods, drought, epidemics, strikes, or freight embargoes, or conditions, causing or threatening to cause interruption in water or power service.

(June 26, 1948, ch. 676, §2, 62 Stat. 1052.)
#### § 266.658 Program monitoring and compliance.

HUD will monitor the performance of the HFA for compliance with the provisions of this subpart.
****

**Cognition**
***High Performance Computing for Learning*
The most effective approaches to problems in learning are  computationally intensive, using optimization techniques in high- dimensional spaces with hundreds or thousands of parameters and  simulation of neurobiological and developmental systems, and in  addition require a grasp of realistic and cognitive constraints.   Integrating machine perception and learning into the HPCC  environment provides an opportunity to develop more robust and  flexible practical systems for tasks such as visual inspection and  can aid understanding of how the brain works. 
Under some conditions, image examples can be used directly  (without physically-based three-dimensional models) for image  analysis and graphics synthesis using learning techniques.  With this  approach, many example images of an object under different imaging  conditions (such as poses and expressions) are gathered, and an  "analysis network" learns to associate to every image a vector of  parameters such as pose and expression.  A "synthesis network"  learns the inverse task of producing the corresponding image given  certain pose and expression parameters.  When only one example  image is available, new "virtual" images can be generated by  learning from prototypical examples, as illustrated in the image  below.  This learning exploits a class of multidimensional  interpolation networks that approximate the nonlinear mapping  between vector input and vector output.  In addition to face  recognition, application areas include computer graphics, special  effects, very low bandwidth teleconferencing, interactive  multimedia, and object recognition systems. 
Conducted at the Center for Biological and Computational Learning at  MIT, this work is funded by NSF, other Federal organizations, and  corporations. 
http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/cbcl/HPCCBlueBook/BlueBook.html**
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**
I, J. Michael Allen, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Georgia Trust Bancshares, Inc. 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report. 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 31, 2005      /s/ J. Michael Allen   J. Michael Allen, President and C.E.O. (Principal Executive Officer)
### §§201 to 208. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 201 to 208, sections 1 to 8, respectively, of act June 27, 1934, ch. 868, §1, 48 Stat. 1283–1286, were omitted pursuant to the decision in the case of Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton R. Co. (Dist. of Col., 1935), 295 U.S. 330, 55 S.Ct. 758, 79 L.Ed. 1468, declaring this subchapter unconstitutional.

Section 201 defined terms for purposes of this subchapter.

Section 202 stated purposes of this subchapter and required a special report to be sent from the Railroad Retirement Board to the President.

Section 203 related to annuities paid under this subchapter.

Section 204 related to compulsory retirement.

Section 205 related to employee contributions.

Section 206 related to existing pension systems.

Section 207 related to employee representatives.

Section 208 related to retirement fund established under this subchapter.

Provisions relating to refund of sums paid by railroads and other carriers of the United States under this subchapter were contained in act June 1, 1938, ch. 315, §§1, 2, 52 Stat. 608.
§ 570.614 Architectural Barriers Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. ( a ) The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157) requires certain Federal and Federally funded buildings and other facilities to be designed, constructed, or altered in accordance with standards that insure accessibility to, and use by, physically handicapped people. A building or facility designed, constructed, or altered with funds allocated or reallocated under this part after December 11, 1995, and that meets the definition of “residential structure” as defined in 24 CFR 40.2 or the definition of “building” as defined in 41 CFR 101-19.602(a) is subject to the requirements of the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157) and shall comply with the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (appendix A to 24 CFR part 40 for residential structures, and appendix A to 41 CFR part 101-19, subpart 101-19.6, for general type buildings).
( b ) The Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131; 47 U.S.C. 155, 201, 218 and 225) (ADA) provides comprehensive civil rights to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, State and local government services, and telecommunications. It further provides that discrimination includes a failure to design and construct facilities for first occupancy no later than January 26, 1993, that are readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. Further, the ADA requires the removal of architectural barriers and communication barriers that are structural in nature in existing facilities, where such removal is readily achievable—that is, easily accomplishable and able to be carried out without much difficulty or expense.
[60 FR 56917, Nov. 9, 1995]
NUMBER 13-15-00131-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

JESSE GARCIA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Jesse Garcia, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his 

conviction in trial court cause number 13-CR-2681-G. The trial court's certification of the 

defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

On March 25, 2015, we ordered appellant's counsel, Chris Iles, to, within thirty 

days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to 
2

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. Appellant’s counsel has indicated that he was 

not trial counsel and cannot respond until he reviews the reporter’s record. A reporter’s 

record has not been filed. 

Therefore, we ABATE this appeal and REMAND this cause to the trial court for a 

hearing to determine why counsel has failed to comply with this Court's order and ensure 

steps are taken so that counsel may comply with this Court’s directive. The trial court's 

findings and conclusions shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The trial

court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, with the Clerk 

of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

If the trial court determines that counsel is unable to represent appellant in this 

matter, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to 

prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to 

appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988); Stafford v. State, 

813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue 

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find 

that appellant desires to pursue this appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed 

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, 

telephone number, email address, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included 

in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

5th day of May, 2015.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRA INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NEW YORK LIFE INVESTMENT

MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-01609 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

UPCOMING DISCOVERY

DISPUTE HEARING

The undersigned has received the letter briefs filed by the parties pertaining to tomorrow’s

discovery dispute and is trying to evaluate the reasonableness of the document requests at issue. 

To that end, the Court requests that counsel supply the definitions to the terms “Any and All,”

“Documents,” and “Communications,” which appear in the attachment to counsel’s letter brief

but are never defined therein. Please provide these definitions at the time the scheduled meetand-confer begins tomorrow morning.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01609-WHA Document 84 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Louise M. Miller, Respondent, v. Leslie W. Miller, Appellant.

Oral motion by respondent on calendar call to dismiss appeal granted by default, without costs, and appeal dismissed, the appellant having failed to file a record or brief. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### **[CHAPTER 39—REPEALED]**