alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2604. Rules and regulations generally; consultation and agreements with other agencies regarding fire regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to perform any and all acts and to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper for the purpose of carrying the provisions of this subchapter into full force and effect. The Secretary of the Interior is further authorized, in formulating forest-practice rules and regulations, to consult with the Oregon State Board of Forestry, representatives of timber owners and operators on or contiguous to said revested and reconveyed lands, and other persons or agencies interested in the use of such lands.

In formulating regulations for the protection of such timberlands against fire, the Secretary is authorized, in his discretion, to consult and advise with Federal, State, and county agencies engaged in forest-fire-protection work, and to make agreements with such agencies for the cooperative administration of fire regulations therein: Provided, That rules and regulations for the protection of the revested lands from fire shall conform with the requirements and practices of the State of Oregon insofar as the same are consistent with the interests of the United States.

(Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 876, title I, §5, 50 Stat. 875.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 876, 50 Stat. 874, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1181e of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC,
      Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May
      11, 2007





/s/
      Craig A. Zabala


Craig
      A.
      Zabala


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §1111. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–134, title IV, §408, Dec. 2, 1997, 111 Stat. 2586

Section, Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1163, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 685; Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §4017(a)(1), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 110, related to Northeast Corridor cost dispute.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection
with the Amended Annual Report of FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Serge Atlan, Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: June 21, 2009 | /s/ SERGE ATLAN
|-------------------- | ---------------
|                     | By: Serge Atlan
|                     | Its: Chairman  



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FalconTarget, Inc. and will be retained by FalconTarget, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
## TEEA~ORNEYGENERAC OF -rExAs Aus- XLTEXAS

June 4, 1953
Hon. Tom Blackwell OpinionNo. WW-444 County Attorney Travis County Austin,Texas Re:

Dear Mr. Blackwell: Your request for an opinlon reads,Whether the real property owned by AlcoholicsAnonymous of Austin is taxable. In part, as follows: "FACTS: The Alcoholic's Anonymousof Austin, Texas under the name of Suburban dlcohollc Foundation have requested an exemption Pron:county and state taxes on the basis that the pro:>erty which they own in **this Corfmdty**  i3 use' **exCluSiW?ly for**  religious, educational an3 charitablepurposes. "QUESTION: Under the laws of the State of Texas, is land owned by Alcoholic'sAnonymousand used in the care and rehabilitationof persons suffering from chronic alcoholism exempt from county
Our answer to the above-mentionedquestion affirmative. is in the grs~nted

it

. The legislature acting under the authority by Section 2 of Article VIII of the Constitutioner:acte'l Section 7 of Article 7150 V.C.S. exempting "allbuflding? Selonging to Institutionsof purely public ch;irity together with the lands belonging to and occupiedby such lnstitutlons,,notleased or otherwiseused with a view to profit.

. . . and state taxes?"

The Supreme Court of Texas In City of Houston v. Scottish Rite Benev. Assn. 230 S. W. 978 held thatpropertyis exempt from taxation If It Is both owned and used exclusively by an institution of public charity. The Court further sts.teJ. that an institutionwas one of "punelypublic charity" where, first, It made no gain or profit, second, it ixcomplished ends wholly benevolent, and, third, It benefitedpersons, indefinite In numbers and personalities,by preventin;; them, through absolute gratuity, from becoming burdens to ~thesL:ts..,:,

,.
~Hdn.'Tom'

Blackwell, Page 2, (OpinionNo. WW-444)

From.the Informationyou presented it is readi_ly as: certainable that AlCoholicamonymous 1s a group or people dedicated to,,the

rehabilitation of alcoholics. The property In question Is owned by them and Is used exclusively in coruiectlon,with

their work. There are no fees or dues and help,is ~extendedto all who desire it regardless of creed, coloror sex. It& opera,tion is strictlynon-profit, it accomplishes ends wholly benevolent and It benefitspersons, Indefinite in numbers and $n personalities, by preventing many of them from'becomingburdens to the state. SUMMARY Real property owned by Alcoholics Anonymous and used in the care and rehabilitationof persons suffering from chronia alcoholism is exempt from county and state taxes under the laws of the State of Texas.

JCP:db APPROVED:. Very trulyyours, WILL WILSON ~(l/)TZXL

John C. Phillips Assistant



### OPINION~COPIMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman L. P. Loller Howard Mays Wayland C. Rivers, Jr. J.'Milton Richardson ,REVIEWEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: W. V. Geppert
### §9813. Model Community Economic Development Finance Corporation; establishment; functions

To the extent he deems appropriate, the Secretary shall utilize funds available under this part to prepare a plan of action for the establishment of a Model Community Economic Development Finance Corporation to provide a user-controlled independent and professionally operated long-term financing vehicle with the principal purpose of providing financial support for community economic development corporations, cooperatives, other affiliated and supportive agencies and organizations associated with community economic development corporations, and other entities eligible for assistance under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §624, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 495.)
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 12

- 00191

- CR

JULIUS STEWART

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. 33487, 33854, 33855, 33907, 33983

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Julius Stewart has filed an interlocutory pro se notice of appeal of the denial of

his mot ion to recuse the trial judge.

We do not have jurisdiction of this interlocutory appeal of the denial of the

motion to recuse

. See Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. Cri m. App. 2008) (standard

for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, but whether

appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002,

no pet.) ( stating that court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only w hen expresslyStewart v. State Page 2

granted by law). No law authorizes the interlocutory appeal of a denial of a motion to

recuse.

W e dismiss this a ppeal for want of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis , and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 20, 2012

Do n ot p ublish

[C R25]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         152,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,187,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                    488,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,856,590
<PP&E>                                          56,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,141,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,922,683
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,084,458
<OTHER-SE>                                   (865,179)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,141,962
<SALES>                                      1,351,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,351,721
<CGS>                                        1,048,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,048,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               252,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             152,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (102,425)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (102,425)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 09-2734 RS (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

*E-Filed 8/23/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JOSE ANGEL JUAREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, 

Respondent. /

No. C 09-2734 RS (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR AN

EXTENSION OF TIME

This is a federal habeas corpus action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate

of appealability (Docket No. 21) is DENIED as moot. The Court declined to issue a

certificate of appealability in its order denying the petition. (See Docket No. 19.) 

This order terminates Docket No. 21. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 23, 2010 

 RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02734-RS Document 26 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 1
### §969. Forfeiture of Arkansas pipeline right of way for nonuser, etc.

If any section of said pipe line shall not be completed within one year after the approval by the Secretary of the Interior of said section, or if any section of said pipe line shall be abandoned or shall not be used for a period of two years, the right of way granted in sections 966 to 970 of this title as to any uncompleted, abandoned, or unused section of said pipe line shall be forfeited to the extent that the same is not completed or is abandoned or unused at the date of the forfeiture, without further action or declaration on the part of the Government or any proceedings or judgment of any court.

(Apr. 12, 1910, ch. 155, §4, 36 Stat. 296.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.612 Restrictions on assistance to students enrolled in an institution of higher education. No assistance shall be provided under section 8 of the 1937 Act to any individual who: ( a ) Is enrolled as a student at an institution of higher education, as defined under section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002);
( b ) Is under 24 years of age;
( c ) Is not a veteran of the United States military;
( d ) Is unmarried;
( e ) Does not have a dependent child;
( f ) Is not a person with disabilities, as such term is defined in section 3(b)(3)(E) of the 1937 Act and was not receiving assistance under section 8 of the 1937 Act as of November 30, 2005; and
( g ) Is not otherwise individually eligible, or has parents who, individually or jointly, are not eligible on the basis of income to receive assistance under section 8 of the 1937 Act.
[70 FR 77743, Dec. 30, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 49333, Aug. 21, 2008]
§ 103.201 Service of notice on aggrieved person. Upon the filing of a complaint, the Assistant Secretary will notify, by certified mail or personal service, each aggrieved person on whose behalf the complaint was filed. The notice will: ( a ) Acknowledge the filing of the complaint and state the date that the complaint was accepted for filing.
( b ) Include a copy of the complaint.
( c ) Advise the aggrieved person of the time limits applicable to complaint processing and of the procedural rights and obligations of the aggrieved person under this part and part 180.
( d ) Advise the aggrieved person of his or her right to commence a civil action under section 813 of the Fair Housing Act in an appropriate United States District Court, not later than two years after the occurrence or termination of the alleged discriminatory housing practice. The notice will state that the computation of this two-year period excludes any time during which a proceeding is pending under this part or part 180 with respect to a complaint or charge based on the alleged discriminatory housing practice. The notice will also state that the time period includes the time during which an action arising from a breach of a conciliation agreement under section 814(b)(2) of the Fair Housing Act is pending.
( e ) Advise the aggrieved person that retaliation against any person because he or she made a complaint or testified, assisted, or participated in an investigation or conciliation under this part or an administrative proceeding under part 180, is a discriminatory housing practice that is prohibited under section 818 of the Fair Housing Act.
[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996. Redesignated at 64 FR 18540, Apr. 14, 1999]
§ 811.103 General. ( a ) In order for obligations to be tax-exempt under this subpart the obligations must be issued by a PHA in connection with a low-income housing project approved by HUD under the Act and the applicable Section 8 regulations. ( 1 ) Except as needed for a resident manager or similar requirement, all dwelling units in a low-income housing project that is to be financed with obligations issued pursuant to this subpart must be Section 8 contract units.
( 2 ) A low-income housing project that is to be financed with obligations issued pursuant to this subpart may include necessary appurtenances. Such appurtenances may include commercial space not to exceed 10% of the total net rentable area.
( b ) Where the parent entity PHA is not the owner of the project, the parent entity PHA or other PHA approvable under § 811.104 must agree to administer the contract pursuant to an ACC with HUD, and such a PHA must agree that in the event there is a default under the contract it will pursue all available remedies to achieve correction of the default, including operation and possession of the project, if called upon by HUD to do so. If the field office finds that the PHA does not have the capacity to perform these functions, the Assistant Secretary may approve alternative contractual arrangements for performing these functions.
<PAGE>
 
                                                               EXHIBIT NUMBER 11

                    INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INC.

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
              (UNAUDITED AND IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                                                 September 30,         September 30,
                                               ------------------     ------------------
                                                 1996       1995        1996       1995
                                               -------    -------     -------    -------
<S>                                            <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Pro forma net income                           $   591    $   521     $ 1,535    $ 1,157
                                               =======    =======     =======    =======
Shares:
  Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding                                   6,404      9,056       6,404      9,056
  Assuming conversion of options issued and
   outstanding                                   4,851      5,146       4,932      5,119
                                               -------    -------     -------    -------
  Weighted average number of common shares
   outstanding as adjusted                     $11,255    $14,202     $11,336    $14,175
                                               =======    =======     =======    =======
Pro forma earnings per common share            $  0.05    $  0.04     $  0.14    $  0.08
                                               =======    =======     =======    =======
</TABLE>

                                       15
### §2703. Functions of the Committee

The Committee shall—

(1) review the management and preservation of the records of Congress;

(2) report to and advise the Congress and the Archivist of the United States on such management and preservation; and

(3)(A) no later than December 31, 1991, conduct a study and submit a report to the Congress on—

(i) the effect any transfer of records of the National Archives and Records Administration from facilities located in Washington, D.C., to any location outside of Washington, D.C., shall have on the management and preservation of the records of Congress; and

(ii) the five year plan for the management and preservation of the records of Congress; and

(B) no later than December 31, 1995, conduct a study to update the report submitted under subparagraph (A)(ii), and submit a report to the Congress.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title IV, §1(d)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1418.)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronavan Mohling, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ Ronavan MohlingRonavan MohlingChairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive OfficerOctober 31, 2003
### §§782, 783. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–558, §1, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246

Section 782, R.S. §2442; act July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §2, 46 Stat. 1016, required Secretary of the Interior to prescribe regulations to carry the provisions of section 829 of this title into effect.

Section 783, act Dec. 13, 1894, ch. 3, 28 Stat. 594, related to bounty warrants and indemnity certificate receivable in payment for lands.
§ 27.25 Termination or adjournment of foreclosure sale. ( a ) Before withdrawing the security property from foreclosure under section 369A(a) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 3709(a)), the commissioner shall notify the Secretary of the proposed withdrawal by telephone or telegram and shall provide the Secretary with a written statement of the reasons for the proposed withdrawal along with all documents submitted by the mortgagor in support of the proposed withdrawal. Upon receipt of this statement, the Secretary shall have 10 days within which to demonstrate orally or in writing why the security property should not be withdrawn from foreclosure. The Secretary shall provide the mortgagor with a copy of any statement prepared by the Secretary in opposition to the proposed withdrawal at the same time the statement is submitted to the commissioner. If the Secretary receives the commissioner's written statement less than 10 days before the scheduled foreclosure sale, the sale shall automatically be postponed for 14 days. Under these circumstances, notice of the rescheduled sale shall be served as described in section 369B(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 3710(c)).
( b ) The commissioner may not withdraw the security property from foreclosure under section 369A(a) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 3709(a)) more than once unless the Secretary consents in writing to such withdrawal.
( c ) The commissioner shall, in the case of a sale adjourned to a later date, mail a copy of the revised Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale to the Secretary at least seven days before the date to which the sale has been adjourned.
( d ) If upon application by the mortgagor, the commissioner refuses to withdraw the property from foreclosure under section 369A(a) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 3709(a)), the commissioner shall provide the mortgagor and the Secretary with a written statement of the reasons for the refusal.