alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 6 , 2015

M r. Asim Shahzad Malik

4523 S. Joplin Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74135

Dear Mr. Shahzad :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ xx.xx of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 22

, filed in D ocket No. FAA

- 20 15

- 1888 , but we are unable to process

your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek , and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provid e a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for e xemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard V. Secord, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc. ("CTI");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 11, 2005

/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Chairman of the Board and Chief
  Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Steven
Walin, Chief Executive Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”),
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(i)  The
Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)  The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Steven
    WalinSteven
      WalinChief
      Executive OfficerDated:  May
      14, 2009
### §1106. Inserting "compliments" forbidden

A report, document, or publication distributed by or from an executive department or independent agency or establishment of the Government may not contain a notice that it is sent with "the compliments" of an officer of the Government, or with a special notice that it is so sent, except that notice that it has been sent, with a request for an acknowledgment of its receipt, may be given.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1261.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §218 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 620).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            5,760
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 10,111
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      30,408
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            8,694
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              8,845
<LOANS>                                         118,156
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  185,680
<DEPOSITS>                                      163,221
<SHORT-TERM>                                        286
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1,033
<LONG-TERM>                                          49
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         10,995
<OTHER-SE>                                       10,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  185,680
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   8,861
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2,228
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11,089
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4,674
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4,682
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             6,407
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       313
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    1
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,062
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2,062
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.39
<LOANS-NON>                                         583
<LOANS-PAST>                                        338
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1,324
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       185
<RECOVERIES>                                         42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1,494
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1,494
                                               


</TABLE>
### §942–8. Reservation of right of alteration, amendment, or repeal; assignment of right of way

Congress reserves the right at any time to alter, amend, or repeal sections 687a, 687a–2 to 687a–5,1 and 942–1 to 942–9 of this title and sections 607a and 615a of title 16 or any part thereof; and the right of way herein authorized shall not be assigned or transferred in any form whatever prior to the construction and completion of at least one-fourth of the proposed mileage of such railroad, wagon road, or tramway, as indicated by the map of definite location, except by mortgages or other liens that may be given or secured thereon to aid in the construction thereof: Provided, That where within ninety days after May 14, 1898, proof is made to the satisfaction of the Secretary of the Interior that actual surveys, evidenced by designated monuments, were made, and the line of a railroad, wagon road, or tramway located thereby, or that actual construction was commenced on the line of any railroad, wagon road, or tramway, prior to January 21, 1898, the rights to inure hereunder shall, if the terms of said sections are complied with as to such railroad, wagon road, or tramway, relate back to the date when such survey or construction was commenced; and in all conflicts relative to the right-of-way or other privilege of said sections the person, company, or corporation having been first in time in actual survey or construction, as the case may be, shall be deemed first in right.

(May 14, 1898, ch. 299, §8, 30 Stat. 412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 687a and 687a–2 to 687a–5 of this title, referred to in text, were repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §§703(a), 704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, 2792.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 418 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
### **CHAPTER 521—MISCELLANEOUS**

Sec.
52101.
Reemployment rights for certain merchant seamen.
§ 207.261 Capturing excess bond proceeds. ( a ) A mortgagee that finances multifamily housing or healthcare facilities insured under Title II of the National Housing Act through the issuance and sale of bonds or bond anticipation notes and uses a project-specific trust indenture agreement, that clearly outlines the project and identifies by project the trust funds established by and administered in accordance with the terms of the trust indenture, shall: ( 1 ) Include the following clause in the trust indenture: In the event of an assignment or conveyance of the mortgage to the Commissioner, subsequent to the issuance of the bonds, all money remaining in all funds and accounts other than the rebate fund, and any other funds remaining under the trust indenture after payment or provision for payment of debt service on the bonds and the fees and expenses of the credit enhancer, issuer, trustee, and other such parties unrelated to the mortgagor (other than funds originally deposited by the mortgagor or related parties on or before the date of issuance of the bonds) shall be returned to the mortgagee.
( 2 ) Upon the Commissioner's payment of an FHA mortgage insurance claim under § 207.259, the mortgagee shall take all legally-entitled actions to enforce the clause required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section and pay the Commissioner any trust funds remaining after discharge by the trustee of all obligations of the trust indenture, no later than 6 months after the date of the Commissioner's final settlement of the FHA mortgage insurance claim.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the term “rebate fund” means a separate fund established under a contract or agreement for tax-exempt bonds in which amounts (excess interest earnings from the tax-exempt bonds) must be deposited to make rebate payments to the federal government under the Internal Revenue Code.
[79 FR 43933, July 29, 2014]
1 

### B E C K H A M , LI SA S u b j ec t: D i sc u ss P S D R ul e s with E P A, L o c a t io n: R9 - C o nfLin e - Ca rd 2 - AI R

_O nl y /C o nf - Lin e/ R e gi o n - 9 - R ES T RI CT ED S t a rt: Mo n 11 / 3 /2014 10 : 30 AM E nd: Mo n 11 / 3 /2014 11 : 30 AM Rec u rre n ce: (n o n e) M ee t i ng S t a tu s: M ee ting o rg a ni z er Or g a n i z er: B E C KH AM , LISA Re qu i re d Att e nd ee s: g o ld m a n m @s b ca p c d. o rg; gwill e y@ c o . s l o . ca .u s; d o n o @ g b u a p c d. o rg; b mc l a ughlin @ b ca q m d. o rg; ss p ae th e@ fr a q m d. o rg; Y a nn ay o n, L a ura O p t io n al Att e nd ee s: Da v id Lu sk; J i m W a g o n er Re s o u rce s: R 9 - C o nfLin e - Ca rd 2 - AI R

_O nl y /C o nf - Lin e/ R e gi o n - 9 - R ES T RI CT ED 

### Call : 8 66 - 2 9 9 - 31 88 C o d e : 4 15 - 9 7 2 - 7 4 1 8 L isa B e ck h a m E n v ir o n m e n t al E ng i n ee r A ir P e r m i t s Offi c e E P A R e g i o n 9 ( 4 1 5 ) 9 7 2 - 3 8 1 1
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of West Coast Car Company (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), I, Alex Ferries,
Secretary/Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated:  3/23/2007                           /s/ Alex FErries
      ---------                           -------------------------
                                          Alex Ferries
                                          Secretary and Treasurer
<PAGE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7351

GERALD D. FULLER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., Warden , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8:18

- cv
- 01598

- PWG )

Submitted : March 8, 2019 Decided: March 18, 2019

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2 012) petition without prejudice as successive and denying his motion to
reconsider . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the distr ict court. Fuller v. Bishop , No. 8:18

- cv
- 01598

- PWG (D. Md. June 14 & Oct. 17, 2018) . We deny a certificate of appealability as unnecessary and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials b efore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5          
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                1,127
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         4,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           8,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     27,188
<PP&E>                                                8,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (3,579)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       32,550
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                14,853
<BONDS>                                                 696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 46
<OTHER-SE>                                           15,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         32,550
<SALES>                                               9,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      9,240
<CGS>                                                 6,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (112)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         550
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (62)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     612
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                            612
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .13
        


</TABLE>
A court may raise the possibility of transfer for improper 1 venue sua sponte. See Schutter v. Herskowitz, Civil Action No. 06-1846 (RMC), 2007 WL 1954416, at *6 n.3 (D.D.C. July 5, 2007). UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________) RICHARD-ENRIQUE: ULLOA, ) ) Plaintiff, )

) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-187 (RWR)

) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________)

MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff, a resident of Ulster County, New York, filed this action challenging a foreclosure proceeding brought in state court in Ulster County, New York concerning real property located there and a lender located in California. The complaint does not allege that any defendant resides or may be found in this district, or that any events giving rise to plaintiff’s claim occurred here, or that any property that is the subject of the action is situated here. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) (prescribing proper venue). Plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing why this complaint should not be dismissed or transferred to the 1
United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (“The district court of a district- 2 -

in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong . . . district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district . . . in which it could have been brought.”). “The plaintiff . . . bears the burden of establishing that venue is proper.” Walden v. Locke, 629 F. Supp. 2d 11, 13 (D.D.C. 2009) (quoting Varma v. Gutierrez, 421 F. Supp. 2d 110, 113 (D.D.C. 2006)). In his response to the Order to show cause, plaintiff argues that “a substantial part of the events and errors and omissions giving rise to the claim” took place in this district because the defendants issued public currency and acted “under the authority of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, . . . which is regulated by the US Treasury Department, through the Comptroller of the Currency, located in this district.” (Pl.’s Mem. of P. & A. in Supp. of Pl.’s Reply to Order to Show Cause ¶ 15.) However, that defendants do business under a regulatory regime overseen by the federal government has no bearing on the location of the foreclosure proceeding that plaintiff challenges in his complaint. That event did not take place in the District of Columbia, but rather in the Northern District of New York, where the property at issue is located. Therefore, this action could have been brought in the Northern District of New York. Because dismissing the complaint would needlessly burden the plaintiff with refiling his complaint in the Northern District of- 3 -

New York, the case will be transferred to that district in the interest of justice under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). Accordingly, is it hereby ORDERED that this case be, and hereby is, TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. All pending motions are left for decision by the
transferee court. SIGNED this 3 day of March, 2010. rd _________/s/________________

RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Ninesling et al., Appellants, v Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 28, 1977, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from an order of the same court, entered November 7, 1977, dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.