alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 884.105 Maximum total ACC commitment and project account (private-owner/PHA projects). ( a ) *Maximum total ACC commitment.* The maximum total annual contribution that may be contracted for in the ACC for a project shall be the total of the Contract Rents plus any utility allowances for all the Contract units in the project, plus a fee for the regular costs of PHA administration. HUD-approved preliminary costs for administration (including administrative costs in connection with PHA activities related to relocation of occupants) shall be payable out of this total.
( b ) *Project account.* In order to assure that housing assistance payments will be increased on a timely basis to cover increases in Contract Rents or decreases in Family Incomes: ( 1 ) A Project Account shall be established and maintained, in an amount as determined by the Secretary consistent with his responsibilities under Section 8(c)(6) of the 1937 Act, out of amounts by which the maximum ACC commitment per year exceeds amounts paid under the ACC for any year. This account shall be established and maintained by HUD as a specifically identified and segregated account, and payment shall be made therefrom only for the purposes of ( i ) housing assistance payments and
( ii ) other costs specifically authorized or approved by the Secretary.
( 2 ) Whenever a HUD-approved estimate of required Annual Contribution exceeds the maximum ACC commitment then in effect, and would cause the amount in the Project Account to be less than an amount equal to 40 percent of such maximum ACC commitment, HUD shall, within a reasonable period of time, take such additional steps authorized by Section 8(c)(6) of the 1937 Act as may be necessary to carry out this assurance, including (as provided in that section of the Act) “the reservation of annual contributions authority for the purpose of amending housing assistance contracts or the allocation of a portion of new authorizations for the purpose of amending housing assistance contracts.”
[41 FR 47168, Oct. 27, 1976, as amended at 61 FR 13593, Mar. 27, 1996; 65 FR 16723, Mar. 29, 2000]
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.850 Which subsidized housing is covered by this subpart? ( a ) If you are the owner of federally assisted housing, your federally assisted housing is covered, except as provided in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section.
( b ) If you are operating public housing, this subpart does not apply, but similar provisions applicable to public housing units are found in parts 960 and 966 of this title. If you administer tenant-based assistance under Section 8 or you are the owner of housing assisted with tenant-based assistance under Section 8, this subpart does not apply to you, but similar provisions that do apply are located in part 982 of this title.
( c ) If you own or administer housing assisted by the Rural Housing Administration under section 514 or section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949, this subpart does not apply to you.
#### § 9.140 Employment.

No qualified individual with disabilities shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613 (subpart G), shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         799,733
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,910,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                   14,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         749,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,064,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          565,880
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    615,757
<COMMON>                                       1,484,741
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,064,321
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,152,070
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               14,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                734,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            734,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   734,259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.270
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.176
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 1


February 13, 2007


                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of ACE
Aviation Holdings Inc. ("ACE") of our report dated February 13, 2007 relating to
the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 40-F.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-122635 and No. 333-129248) and on Form F-10
(No. 333-126194) of ACE of our report dated February 13, 2007 relating to the
financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 40-F. We also consent to
the reference to us under the heading "Attestation Report of the Registered
Public Accounting Firm" in this Form 40-F.

/S/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
#### Wall Street Traders, Inc., v. Samuel H. Wang.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Rulings made during an examination before trial are not appealable *(Caban*v. *New York City Tr. Auth.,*10 A D 2d 548). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
MDwerks, Inc.

We hereby consent to the use in Form 10KSB/A of our report dated January 25, 2006, except for the second paragraph in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is February 1, 2006 and the fifteenth paragraph of Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is February 13, 2006 on the consolidated financial statements of MDwerks, Inc. and Subsidiaries which appear in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report of MDwerks, Inc. and Subsidiaries.

/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP

GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York
April 30, 2007

---
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent
,

v.

COY GLEN BALL, Petitioner

.
No. 1 CA

- CR 21

- 0542 PRPC FILED 7

- 28

- 2022

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2013

- 420642

- 001 The Honorable Adam D. Driggs
, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent

Coy Glen Ball
, Florence PetitionerSTATE v. BALL Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge David D. Weinzweig, Judge Brian Y. Furuya and Judge Jennifer M. Perki n s delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM :

¶1 Petitioner Ball seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief. This is petitioner’s second petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a p etition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v . Poblete
, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, an d the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
#### Barclay Commerce Corp. v. Abraham Finkelstein et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### § 35.320 Hazard reduction.

Each owner shall conduct interim controls consistent with the findings of the risk assessment report. Hazard reduction shall be conducted in accordance with subpart R of this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 315 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.315

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Milton 
Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal of the charter of the advisory committee on reactor safeguards.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) was established by the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954, as amended. Its purpose is to provide advice to the Commission with regard to the hazards of proposed or existing reactor facilities, to review each application for a construction permit or operating license for certain facilities specified in the AEA, and such other duties as the Commission may request.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Russell E. Chazell, Office of the Secretary, NRC, Washington, DC 20555; telephone: (301) 415-7469 or at                         *Russell.Chazell@nrc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The AEA as amended by Public Law 100-456 also specifies that the Defense Nuclear Safety Board may obtain the advice and recommendations of the ACRS.

Membership on the Committee includes individuals experienced in reactor operations, management; probabilistic risk assessment; analysis of reactor accident phenomena; design of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components; materials science; and mechanical, civil, and electrical engineering.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that renewal of the charter for the ACRS until December 2, 2022, is in the public interest in connection with the statutory responsibilities assigned to the ACRS. This action is being taken in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

Dated: December 2, 2020.

Russell E. Chazell,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26804 Filed 12-4-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aspeon,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2008 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  I, David J.  Cutler,
President,  Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 USC  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 20, 2008


/s/ David J. Cutler
------------------------------------------------------------------
David J. Cutler, President, Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer and Director


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 21.1

Name

Jurisdiction of IncorporationApplied4 Technology Ltd.

United KingdomKLD Research & Analytics, Inc

DelawareKLD Research Limited

United Kingdom1 Corporate Governance Pty Ltd.

AustraliaInstitutional Shareholder Services Canada Corp.

CanadaInstitutional Shareholder Services Europe S.A.

BelgiumInstitutional Shareholder Services France S.A.

FranceInstitutional Shareholder Services, Inc.

DelawareInstitutional Shareholder Services Japan K.K.

JapanISS Corporate Services, Inc.

DelawareISS Europe Ltd.

United KingdomISS RREV, Inc.

DelawareInvestor Responsibility Research Center, Inc.

DelawareResearch Recommendations and Electronic Voting Ltd.

United KingdomRiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC

DelawareRiskMetrics Group K.K.

JapanRiskMetrics (Australia) Pty Ltd.

AustraliaRiskMetrics (Singapore) Pte Ltd.

SingaporeRiskMetrics Solutions, Inc.

DelawareRiskMetrics (U.K.) Ltd.

United KingdomSecurities Class Action Services LLC

Delaware


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Report’’) by MDwerks Inc. (the ‘‘Registrant’’), I, Howard B. Katz, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|          |                                                                                                                                   |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant. |

|  | /s/ Howard B. Katz                        Name: Howard B. KatzTitle: Chief Executive Officer |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: March 21, 2007

----
EX-10.1


  Exhibit 10.1

  FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 

  ITEOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

  2020 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

   

   

  Pursuant to Section 18 of the iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

  The definition of “Compensation” in Section 11 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:

  “The term ‘Compensation’ means the amount of total cash compensation, prior to salary reduction pursuant to Sections 125, 132(f) or 401(k) of the Code, including regular base pay and regular base wages, overtime and commissions, but excluding incentive or bonus awards, if any, allowances and reimbursements for expenses such as relocation allowances or travel expenses, income or gains related to Company stock options or other share-based awards, and similar items. The Administrator shall have the discretion to determine the application of this definition to Participants outside the United States.”

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, iTeos Therapeutics, Inc. has caused this instrument of amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of this 29th day of September, 2022.

   

   

  ITEOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

   

   

  By: /s/ Michel Detheux

  	Name:  Michel Detheux

  Title:   President & CEO  	

  	-1-

  129335475_1
### §56503. Types of adjustments and arrangements

(a) Suspension Requirements.—An adjustment or arrangement under this chapter shall include suspension of—

(1) the requirement to operate the vessel in foreign trade under the applicable operating-differential or construction-differential subsidy contract or mortgage or other agreement; and

(2) the right to operating-differential subsidy for the vessel.

(b) Discretionary Adjustments and Arrangements.—To the extent the Secretary of Transportation considers appropriate to carry out the purposes of this subtitle, an adjustment or arrangement under this chapter may include any of the following:

(1) Lay-up of the vessel by the owner or in the custody of the Secretary, with payment or reimbursement by the Secretary of necessary and proper expenses (including reasonable overhead and insurance) or a fixed periodic allowance instead of payment or reimbursement.

(2) Postponement, for not more than the total period of the lay-up, of the maturity date of each installment of the principal of obligations to the United States Government for the vessel (regardless of whether the maturity date is during a lay-up period), or rearrangement of those maturities.

(3) Postponement or cancellation of interest accruing on the obligations during a lay-up period.

(4) Extension, for not more than the total period of the lay-up, of the 20-year life limitation for the vessel and other limitations and provisions of this subtitle based on a 20-year life.

(5) Provision for temporary or emergency employment of the vessel (instead of lay-up) as may be practicable, with such arrangements for management of the vessel, payment of expenses, and application of the proceeds of the employment, as the Secretary may approve, with any period of operation being included as part of the lay-up period.

(6) Payment to the Secretary, on termination of the arrangements with the applicant, of the applicant's net profits (earned while the arrangements were in effect) in excess of 10 percent a year on the capital necessarily employed in the applicant's business, as reimbursement for obligations postponed or canceled and expenses incurred or paid by the Secretary under this section.

(c) Laid-Up Vessels.—Under subsection (b)(6), capital of the applicant represented by a vessel of the applicant laid-up or operated under this section shall be included in capital necessarily employed in the applicant's business. The Secretary may require a vessel laid-up or operated under this section to be security for reimbursement.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1657.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 56503 | 46 App.:1242a(c). | June 29, 1940, ch. 442, subdiv. (c), 54 Stat. 685; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(132), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 165. |

Section
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1649

MELVIN MARINKOVIC,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FALCK EMS HOLDINGS, INC.; FALCK A/S, a/k/a The Falck Group, as Alter Ego 

of Falck EMS, Jointly and Severally; THE LUNDECK FOUNDATION, as Alter 

Ego of Falck A/S,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

LAYLA VASQUEZ; RYAN WATKINS; JOHN OLIVIERA; DIANA 

ROSEMOND; MIKE HUNTEMANN; ALLAN LARSEN; MORTON 

PEDERSON; KIRKBI, as Alter Ego of Falck A/S; MEDSTAR HEALTH, 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cv-03069-GLR)

Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: March 1, 2018

Before MOTZ, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Melvin Marinkovic, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Robert Seegull, JACKSON LEWIS PC, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Marinkovic appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice 

his second amended civil complaint for failure to complete Marshal forms and summonses 

with correct information to effect service, and a subsequent order denying his Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Marinkovic v. Falck EMS Holdings, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-03069-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 29, 2016; 

May 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED