alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 81.85 Public disclosure of final orders and agreements. ( a ) *Disclosure.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary shall make available to the public final orders; written agreements and statements; and modifications and terminations of those orders, agreements, and statements, as set forth in 12 U.S.C. 4586(a) and the implementing regulations in this subpart G. The retention of records of these orders, agreements, and statements, and their modifications and terminations, are governed by 12 U.S.C. 4586(e).
( b ) *Exceptions to disclosure.* Exceptions to disclosure will be determined in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 4586 (c), (d), and (f) and paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Filing documents under seal* — ( 1 ) *Request by party.* Upon the denial by the ALJ of a motion for a protective order, any party may request the Secretary to file any document or part of a document under seal if the party believes that disclosure of the document would be contrary to the public interest. Any other party may file with the Secretary a reply to such a request within 5 working days after a request is made or some other time to be determined by the Secretary. Such requests and replies are governed by § 26.38 of this title.
( 2 ) *Effect of request.* A document or part of a document that is the subject of a timely request to the Secretary to file under seal will not be disclosed under this section until the Secretary has advised the parties and the ALJ, in writing, of the Secretary's decision on whether the document or part of a document should be filed under seal. The ALJ shall take all appropriate steps to preserve the confidentiality of such documents or parts of documents, including closing portions of the hearing to the public.
( 3 ) *Time of request.* Failure to file with the Secretary a timely request or a reply is deemed a waiver of any objection regarding the decision on whether a document is to be disclosed. A party must make its request to file a document under seal at least 10 days before the commencement of the hearing. A request may be filed at any other time before or during the course of the hearing, but the requesting party's obligation to produce the document or parts of the document will not be affected by the party's pending request to the Secretary, unless the Secretary expressly directs the ALJ to treat the document as protected from disclosure until the Secretary makes a final written decision on whether the document should be filed under seal. If the Secretary's direction to the ALJ is made orally, that direction must be reduced to writing and filed with the ALJ within 3 working days of the making of the oral order or the document will then be subject to disclosure pending the Secretary's final written decision on disclosure.
[60 FR 61888, Dec. 1, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 50219 Sept. 24, 1996]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRAIG YATES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

YONG KEE COMPANY INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02290 JSW

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

CASE SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED

On May 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action. There has been no further

action in this case, and it does not appear from the record that Plaintiff served Defendant. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause why the case should not be

dismissed under Rule 4(m) for failure to timely serve the Defendant or, in the alternative, why

the case should not be dismissed under Rule 41 for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff’s response to

this Order to Show Cause shall be due on February 12, 2010. Failure to file a timely response

to this Order to Show Cause shall result in dismissal of this case without further notice to

Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02290-JSW Document 4 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 1
### §6346. Sustainable manufacturing initiative

#### (a) In general

As part of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the Department of Energy, the Secretary, on the request of a manufacturer, shall carry out onsite technical assessments to identify opportunities for—

(1) maximizing the energy efficiency of industrial processes and cross-cutting systems;

(2) preventing pollution and minimizing waste;

(3) improving efficient use of water in manufacturing processes;

(4) conserving natural resources; and

(5) achieving such other goals as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

#### (b) Coordination

To implement any recommendations resulting from an onsite technical assessment carried out under subsection (a) and to accelerate the adoption of new and existing technologies and processes that improve energy efficiency, the Secretary shall coordinate with—

(1) the Advanced Manufacturing Office of the Department of Energy;

(2) the Building Technologies Office of the Department of Energy;

(3) the Federal Energy Management Program of the Department of Energy; and

(4) the private sector and other appropriate agencies, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

#### (c) Research and development program for sustainable manufacturing and industrial technologies and processes

As part of the industrial efficiency programs of the Department of Energy, the Secretary shall carry out a joint industry-government partnership program to research, develop, and demonstrate new sustainable manufacturing and industrial technologies and processes that maximize the energy efficiency of industrial plants, reduce pollution, and conserve natural resources.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §376, as added Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title V, §40522(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1067.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6346, Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §376, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 938; Pub. L. 95–619, title IV, §461(d)(1), title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3275, 3288, set forth general provisions relating to compliance with former part C reporting requirements, use of information, and absence of liability for failure to meet energy efficiency improvement targets, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–509, title III, §3101(b), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1888.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of this title.
DEPTH
GRADIENTS.

CORRECTED METER Ss Ld

COOS BAY, OR
+#66=, PRELIiv-.- a
aE GA oT pe EE

CONTOURS | perc
CONTOURS IN CORPESTEL METERS
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### § 5.713 Second- and third-party rights.

Nothing in this subpart is intended to create any right of the family residing in HUD Housing or any party, other than HUD or a PHA, to require enforcement of the standards required by this subpart or to assert any claim against HUD or the PHA for damages, injunction, or other relief for alleged failure to enforce the standards.
### §36c. Acceptance of contributions from public and private sources; cooperation with other agencies in prosecution of projects

In fiscal year 1987 and thereafter the United States Geological Survey is authorized to accept lands, buildings, equipment, and other contributions from public and private sources and to prosecute projects in cooperation with other agencies, Federal, State, or private.

(Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title I], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–252, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title I], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–252; Pub. L. 102–154, title I, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1000.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Geological Survey" substituted in text for "Geological Survey" pursuant to provision of title I of Pub. L. 102–154, set out as a note under section 31 of this title.
§ 58.37 Environmental impact statement determinations. ( a ) An EIS is required when the project is determined to have a potentially significant impact on the human environment.
( b ) An EIS is required under any of the following circumstances, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) The project would provide a site or sites for, or result in the construction of, hospitals or nursing homes containing a total of 2,500 or more beds.
( 2 ) The project would remove, demolish, convert or substantially rehabilitate 2,500 or more existing housing units (but not including rehabilitation projects categorically excluded under § 58.35), or would result in the construction or installation of 2,500 or more housing units, or would provide sites for 2,500 or more housing units.
( 3 ) The project would provide enough additional water and sewer capacity to support 2,500 or more additional housing units. The project does not have to be specifically intended for residential use nor does it have to be totally new construction. If the project is designed to provide upgraded service to existing development as well as to serve new development, only that portion of the increased capacity which is intended to serve new development should be counted.
( c ) If, on the basis of an EA, a responsible entity determines that the thresholds in paragraph (b) of this section are the sole reason for the EIS, the responsible entity may prepare a FONSI pursuant to 40 CFR 1501.4. In such cases, the FONSI must be made available for public review for at least 30 days before the responsible entity makes the final determination whether to prepare an EIS.
( d ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, an EIS is not required where § 58.53 is applicable.
( e ) *Recommended EIS Format.* The responsible entity must use the EIS format recommended by the CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1502.10) unless a determination is made on a particular project that there is a compelling reason to do otherwise. In such a case, the EIS format must meet the minimum requirements prescribed in 40 CFR 1502.10.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3115 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3115

           To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clocks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2005

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clocks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CLOCKS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.57      Clocks, whether or  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         not put up in                                                      31/2008
                         sets, put up for
                         mail order retail
                         sale, and each
                         weighing not over
                         2.5 kg together
                         with their retail
                         packaging
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9105.21.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### **CHAPTER 573—VESSEL TRADE-IN PROGRAM**

Sec.
57301.
Definitions.
57302.
Authority to acquire vessels.
57303.
Utility value and tonnage requirements.
57304.
Eligible acquisition dates.
57305.
Determination of trade-in allowance.
57306.
Payment of trade-in allowance.
57307.
Recognition of gain for tax purposes.
57308.
Use of vessels at least 25 years old.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of International Securities
Exchange, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Krell, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ DAVID KRELLName:

David KrellTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 20, 2006



---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to International Securities Exchange, Inc. and will be retained by International Securities Exchange, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** | This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GARY LEE SMITH,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 761 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Seymour Gratz v. Edward F. Cavanagh, Jr., as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the Corporation Counsel and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMON MIKIANGELO BERRY,III,

Plaintiff,

    v.

R. METCALFE,

Defendant._______________________________                                

)))))))))) )

No. C 09-2027 MMC (PR)  

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’SSECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OFTIME TO OPPOSE SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION

(Docket No. 36)

Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is hereby

GRANTED.  Within thirty days of the date this order is filed, plaintiff shall file with the

court and serve on defendant’s counsel opposition to defendant’s motion for summary

judgment.  Defendant shall file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition within fifteen days of the

date such opposition is filed.

This order terminates Docket No. 36.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:  August 6, 2010

_____________________________MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02027-MMC   Document 37   Filed 08/06/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T20:59:51-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### §§351 to 355. Repealed. Pub. L. 88–417, §1, Aug. 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 389

Section 351, act Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §1, 41 Stat. 293, authorized Secretary of the Interior to grant permits to explore for underground water.

Section 352, acts Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §2, 41 Stat. 294; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to designation by Secretary of lands subject to disposal.

Section 353, acts Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §3, 41 Stat. 294; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to application for permit to explore for under-ground water.

Section 354, act Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §4, 41 Stat. 294, related to conditions of permit and its cancellation for failure to meet them.

Section 355, act Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §5, 41 Stat. 294, related to issuance of a patent to land on the development of a water supply.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 88–417, §1, Aug. 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 389, provided: "That, subject to any valid rights and obligations existing on the date of approval of this Act [Aug. 11, 1964], the Act of October 22, 1919 (41 Stat. 293; 43 U.S.C. 351–355, 357–360), is hereby repealed."

#### Processing of Applications Filed Prior to August 11, 1964

Pub. L. 88–417, §2, Aug. 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 389, provided that: "Any valid application for permit under that Act [this chapter], on file with the Secretary of the Interior on the effective date of this Act [Aug. 11, 1964], may be processed in the same manner as if this Act [repealing sections 351 to 355 and 357 to 360 of this title] had not been enacted."
### §1338. Disposition of revenues

All rentals, royalties, and other sums paid to the Secretary or the Secretary of the Navy under any lease on the outer Continental Shelf for the period from June 5, 1950, to date, and thereafter shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States and credited to miscellaneous receipts.

(Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 345, §9, 67 Stat. 469.)
[Cite as In re M.T., 2017-Ohio-6939.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

BUTLER COUNTY 

IN THE MATTER OF: : 

 M.T. : CASE NO. CA2017-03-032 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 7/24/2017 

 : 

 : 

APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

JUVENILE DIVISION 

Case No. JC2016-0545 

Lorraine McBride Search, 215 South Sutphin Street, Middletown, Ohio 45044, for appellant 

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Lina N. Alkamhawi, Government 

Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45044, for appellee, state of 

Ohio 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by appellant's 

counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, M.T., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 
Butler CA2017-03-032 

- 2 - 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial 

to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one 

potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) 

requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the 

proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's 

constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the 

basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and 

motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

 HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Anna E. Gassner v. Robert E. Herman, as State Rent Administrator.

Motion to vacate order of this court denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.