alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 -

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

NANCY HERSH, ESQ., State Bar No. 49091

CYNTHIA L. BROWN, ESQ., State Bar No. 248846

JOSEPH BOYLE, ESQ., State Bar No. 132539

HERSH & HERSH

A Professional Corporation

601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2080

San Francisco, CA 94102-6396

(415) 441-5544

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SARAH BOOHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOAH BOOHER,

Plaintiff

v.

CITY and COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO

POLICE OFFICER SCHWAB STAR

NO. 2099, SFPD OFFICER

CASTANEDA STAR NO. 451, SFPD

OFFICER CHAMBERS STAR NO. 972,

SFPD OFFICER FROST STAR NO.

1507, SFPD OFFICER REYES STAR

NO. 492, and DOES ONE through

TWENTY,

Defendants

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO.: C 09-01045 MHP

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE FURTHER CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Complaint Filed: 3/10/2009

Hearing date: May 17, 2010

Time: 3:00 PM

Dept: Courtroom 15, 18th Floor

Plaintiff NOAH BOOHER, by and through his counsel, Joseph Boyle, of Hersh &

Hersh, a Professional Corporation, and Defendants CITY and COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO; SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICER SCHWAB STAR NO. 2099, SFPD

OFFICER CASTANEDA STAR NO. 451, SFPD OFFICER CHAMBERS STAR NO. 972,

Case 3:09-cv-01045-MHP Document 53 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SFPD OFFICER FROST STAR NO. 1507, SFPD OFFICER REYES STAR NO. 492, by 

and through their counsel, Joshua S. White of Office of City Attorney, submit the following

Stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that both parties have agreed that the Further Case

Management Conference set for May 10, 2010 at 3:00 PM be continued to June 21, 2010 at

3:00 PM.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: May 4, 2010 HERSH & HERSH

A Professional Corporation

By /s/ Joseph Boyle____

Joseph Boyle

Attorney for Plaintiff

NOAH BOOHER

DATED: May 4, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA

City Attorney

JOANNE HOEPER

Chief Trial Attorney

JOSHUA S. WHITE

Deputy City Attorney

By /s/ Joshua S. White_

JOSHUA S. WHITE

Attorney for Defendants

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO, ET AL.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

_______________________________

HON. MARILYN H. PATEL

JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

July 12, 5/5/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-01045-MHP Document 53 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 599.401 Ranking of applications. ( a ) *Ranking order.* Rural and urban applications will be ranked according to their final scores as determined in accordance with § 599.303, with the highest scoring applications ranked first.
( b ) *Separate ranking categories.* After initial ranking, both rural and urban applications will be separated into two ranking categories: ( 1 ) *Category 1.* Applications for designation of nominated areas that are Enterprise Communities or Empowerment Zones will be placed into Category 1 in rank order.
( 2 ) *Category 2.* Applications for designation of nominated areas that are not placed into or selected from Category 1 will be placed into Category 2 in rank order.
§ 3286.409 Obtaining inspection. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75759 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) *Inspection obligations.* Ten business days prior to the completion of installation, the installer must arrange for a third-party inspection of the work performed, in accordance with subpart F of this part, unless the installer and retailer who contracted with the purchaser for the sale of the home agree, in writing, that during the same time period the retailer will arrange for the inspection. Such inspection must be performed as soon as practicable by an inspector who meets the qualifications set forth in § 3286.511. The scope of the inspections that are required to be performed is addressed in § 3286.505.
( b ) *Contract rights not affected.* Failure to arrange for an inspection of a home within 5 business days will not affect the validity or enforceability of any sale or contract for the sale of any manufactured home.
( c ) *State or local permits.* The licensed installer should obtain all necessary permits required under state or local laws.
#### § 3285.201 Soil conditions.

To help prevent settling or sagging, the foundation must be constructed on firm, undisturbed soil or fill compacted to at least 90 percent of its maximum relative density. All organic material such as grass, roots, twigs, and wood scraps must be removed in areas where footings are to be placed. After removal of organic material, the home site must be graded or otherwise prepared to ensure adequate drainage, in accordance with § 3285.203.
### §619b. Reimbursement of funds advanced by non-Federal purchasers; uprating program; repayment requirement; visitor facilities program

Reimbursement of funds advanced by non-Federal purchasers for the uprating program shall be a repayment requirement of the Boulder Canyon project beginning with the first day of the month following completion of each segment thereof. The cost of the visitor facilities program as defined in section 619(a) of this title shall become a repayment requirement beginning June 1, 1987, or when substantially completed, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, if later.

(Pub. L. 98–381, title I, §106, Aug. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 1339.)
#### NOWAKOWSKA v. GOLLICK & SMITH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Constance Nowakowska against Golliek & Smith. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
```

[House Report 105-18]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-18
_______________________________________________________________________

              PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE RESOLUTION
 
    (H. RES. 89) REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT SUBMIT A BALANCED BUDGET

                                _______
                                

   March 11, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

   Mr. Solomon, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 90]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 90, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration in the House 
of H. Res. 89, a resolution ``Requesting the President Submit a 
Balanced Budget'' under a closed rule. The rule provides 2 
hours of debate divided equally between the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget or their 
designees.
    Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, 
which may contain instructions if offered by the Minority 
Leader or his designee. If including instructions, the motion 
shall be debatable for five minutes by the proponent and five 
minutes by an opponent.

                                

```
### §§19 to 21. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1029

Section 19, R.S. §2469, related to certified copies of records of the General Land Office.

Section 20, R.S. §2470, related to exemplification of the records of the General Land Office as evidence.

Section 21, R.S. §461; acts Apr. 2, 1888, ch. 54, 25 Stat. 76; Oct. 12, 1888, ch. 1098, 25 Stat. 557; May 29, 1908, ch. 220, §15, 35 Stat. 469; June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 908, related to fees for exemplifications.

For Department of the Interior record provisions and Government records and papers, see section 1460 et seq. of this title, and section 1733 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### JACKSON, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN DAILY EAGLE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Agnes V. Jackson against the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. W. N. Dykman, for appellant. G. 0. Harrison, for respondent.

No opinion. Upon the plaintiff stipulating to reduce the judgment ás entered to the sum of $1,696.40, the judgment as so reduced affirmed, without costs to either party; if such stipulation be not given, judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–18

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE RESOLUTION (H.

RES. 89) REQUESTING THE PRESIDENT SUBMIT A BALANCED BUDGET

MARCH 11, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 90]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 90, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration in the House of H.

Res. 89, a resolution ‘‘Requesting the President Submit a Balanced

Budget’’ under a closed rule. The rule provides 2 hours of debate

divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget or their designees.

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, which may

contain instructions if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee. If including instructions, the motion shall be debatable for

five minutes by the proponent and five minutes by an opponent.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, 

Social Security Administration

ELIZABETH FIRER, SBN WI 1034148

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8937

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

PAULA HARRIS-MOORE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. C-09-02804 CRB

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

REMAND

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the

approval of the Court, that this action be remanded to the Defendant, Commissioner of Social Security,

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings. The purpose of the remand is to

offer Plaintiff a new hearing and decision.

Upon remand, the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review will remand this case to an 

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and direct him or her to obtain additional evidence from the treating

sources, especially with regard to Plaintiff’s mental impairment and to include medical source

statements with this evidence; obtain a consultative psychiatric examination with psychological testing

and medical source statements; evaluate the severity of Plaintiff’s mental impairments pursuant to 20

C.F.R. § 404.1520a; re-evaluate Plaintiff’s alleged physical impairments; re-evaluate Plaintiff’s

Case 3:09-cv-02804-CRB Document 14 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

subjective complaints pursuant to Social Security Ruling (SSR) 96-7p; evaluate Plaintiff’s residual

functional capacity pursuant to SSR 96-8p; and if warranted by the expanded record, obtain vocational

expert evidence at step five of the sequential disability evaluation.

Dated: January 20, 2010 /s/ Tony Arjo 

 (As authorized via email)

TONY ARJO

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

Dated: January 20, 2010 By: /s/ Elizabeth Firer 

ELIZABETH FIRER

Special Assistant United States Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that this action is reversed and remanded to the

Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further

proceedings.

Dated: _____________________________

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

January 22, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-02804-CRB Document 14 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2
### §5515. Use of publicly assisted housing by Secretary in demonstrations

The Secretary shall make appropriate use of publicly assisted housing and particularly low-rent housing assisted under the United States Housing Act of 1937 [42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.] in demonstrating solar heating systems and combined solar heating and cooling systems under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–409, §17, Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1078.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The United States Housing Act of 1937, referred to in text, is act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, as revised generally by Pub. L. 93–383, title II, §201(a), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 653, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§1437 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1437 of this title and Tables.
### §6804. Funding, administrative, and judicial authorities of Secretary

The Secretary may—

(1) fund (A) demonstration projects to improve electric utility load management procedures and (B) regulatory rate reform initiatives,

(2) on request of a State, a utility regulatory commission, or of any participant in any proceeding before a State utility regulatory commission which relates to electric utility rates or rate design, intervene and participate in such proceeding, and

(3) on request of any State, utility regulatory commission, or party to any action to obtain judicial review of an administrative proceeding in which the Secretary intervened or participated under paragraph (2), intervene and participate in such action.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title II, §204, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1143; Pub. L. 95–617, title I, §143, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–617 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator", meaning Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration in two places.
Exhibit 10.4
​
Execution Version
​
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA, INC.
CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
​
The following amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the Theravance Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) on July 12, 2022. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
​
		1.
	Amendment to Definition of Change in Control. The definition of “Change in Control” in the Plan is amended to add the following to the last paragraph thereof:


​
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, a sale by Theravance Biopharma US Holdings, Inc. and Triple Royalty Sub II LLC, each a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, of the Class B Units and Class C Units held by each of them in Theravance Respiratory Company, LLC , shall not constitute a Change in Control.
​
		2.
	Effect on the Plan.  Except as specifically amended by this First Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


​
		3.
	Governing Law.  This First Amendment shall be governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended and, to the extent applicable, the laws of the State of California.


​
[Signature Page Follows]
​
​



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written.
​
	​


	​


	​



	​
	THERAVANCE BIOPHARMA, INC.

	​
	​

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	/s/ Rick E Winningham

	​
	Name:   Rick E Winningham

	​
	Title:   Chief Executive Officer



​

[Signature Page to First Amendment to the Theravance Biopharma, Inc. Change in Control Severance Plan]
#### § 81.51 General.

This subpart details the requirements and procedures for review of requests for new program approval by the Secretary.
§ 35.1110 Notices and pamphlet. ( a ) *Notice.* In cases where evaluation or hazard reduction is undertaken, each public housing agency (PHA) shall provide a notice to residents in accordance with § 35.125. A visual assessment alone is not considered an evaluation for purposes of this part.
( b ) *Lead hazard information pamphlet.* The PHA shall provide the lead hazard information pamphlet in accordance with § 35.130.
[64 FR 50215, Sept. 15, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 34273, June 21, 2004]
7/16/04 Final INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P040692 Assessor: Delpire ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 1. Release Activity: Use Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: 1339.20 1300.00 2190.00 0.00 0.00 (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: 186. 0. Per Site Release: 7.20 1300.00 2190.00 0.00 0.00 (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks: Water release is to water OR landfill OR incineration. Incineration release is below threshold of concern.

Consumer use expected? No, consumer use is not expected.INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040692 SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES SCENARIO #:1 RELEASE ACTIVITY:Use SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION:POTW (Indust., incl udes POTWs which receive ind. disch.) SIC-CODE (S):4952 EXPOSED POPULATION:Adult

WASTE WATER TREATMENT REMOVAL (%) COC (μg/L) RELEASE DAYS PRE-TREATMENT RELEASE

(kg/day) POST-TREATMENT RELEASE

(kg/day) BCF (L/kg) 50. 40.00 186. 7.2 3.60 0.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER PLANT TYPE % ILE FACILITY STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. ( : g/l) Harmonic

MEAN 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 Harmonic MEAN 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 ALL 50 311.58 116.44 75.70 61.91 11.55 30.92 47.56 58.15 ALL 10 32.75 11.98 7.19 5.98 109.92 300.50 500.70 602.01

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES Exposure Units Drinking Water Results Drinking Water Units Fish Ingestion Results Fish Ingestion

Units 50% 10% 50% 10% Cancer LADD pot 4.59E-05 4.37E-04 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day LADC pot2.36E-03 2.24E-02 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg Chronic Non-Cancer ADD pot 1.15E-04 1.09E-03 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day ADC pot5.89E-03 5.60E-02 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg Acute ADR pot 2.58E-03 2.51E-02 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/dayINITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P040692

SIC CODE EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1 RELEASE ACTIVITY: Use SIC CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW (Indust., in cludes POTWs which receive ind. disch.) ASSOCIATED SIC CODES: 4952 from 1011-1999,2211-5199,5511-5599,7211-8099 SIC CODE RESULTS COC ( : g/L) % yr exceeded Days/yr exceeded Release days/year Loading (kg/site/day) Waste Water Treatment (%) High/Avg Analysis 40.00 33.74 123 186 7.20 50.00 High

REMARK: The concentration of concern (COC ) is exceeded 20 or more days per year.INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P040692

DRINKING WATER EXPOSURE ESTIMATES FROM LANDFILL RELEASES SCENARIO #:1 ACTIVITY:Use RELEASE DESCRIPTION: EXPOSED POPULATION:Adult

NUMBER OF SITES LANDFILL RELEASE (kg/yr) LANDFILLED SLUDGE (kg/yr) MIGRATION FACTOR 1 DRINKING WATER TREATMENT (%) 1. 1300.00 0.00 6.00E-05(Moderate) 0.00

Exposure Units Results ASSUMPTIONS ED (years) AT (years) BW (kg) IR (L/day) Cancer LADD pot(mg/kg/day) 6.08E-04 30.00 75.00 71.80 1.40 LADC pot(mg/L) 3.12E-02 30.00 75.00 NA NA Chronic Non-Cancer ADD pot(mg/kg/day) 1.52E-03 30.00 30.00 71.80 1.40 ADC pot(mg/L) 7.80E-02 30.00 30.00 NA NA
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Additional Convertible Note-JPMorgan Chase Bank



  
 Exhibit 10.91

 JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association 
 P.O. Box 161 
 60 Victoria Embankment 
 London EC4Y 0JP 
 England 

August 30, 2010 
 To: Gilead Sciences, Inc.  
 333 Lakeside Drive 

Foster City, California 94404 

			
	 Attention:
	  	 Treasurer

	 Telephone No.:
	  	 (650) 522-5727

	 Facsimile No.:
	  	 (650) 522-3000


 Re: Additional
Call Option Transaction (2014) 
 1.        Reference is made to the
letter agreement Re: Additional Call Option Transaction (2014) dated August 5, 2010 and entered into between into between JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch (“Dealer”) and Gilead Sciences, Inc.
(“Counterparty”) (the “Confirmation”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Confirmation. 

2.        Whereas the Confirmation defined the Free Convertibility Date as
April 1, 2014, but Counterparty and Dealer wish to define the Free Convertibility Date as February 1, 2014; 
 3.        Now, therefore, each of Counterparty and Dealer do hereby agree that: 

a.        the definition of the Free Convertibility Date in the Confirmation is
hereby replaced in its entirety by February 1, 2014; 

b.        (i) J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., an affiliate of Dealer
(“JPMSI”), has acted solely as agent and not as principal with respect to the Transaction and (ii) JPMSI has no obligation or liability, by way of guaranty, endorsement or otherwise, in any manner in respect of the Transaction
(including, if applicable, in respect of the settlement thereof); 

c.        each of Counterparty and Dealer will look solely to the other party
(or any guarantor in respect thereof) for performance of such other party’s obligations under the Transaction; and 
 d.        this agreement may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if all of the signatures thereto
and hereto were upon the same instrument. 
 [Signature Page to Follow] 







  
 
			
	Very truly yours,
	
	J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as agent for JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Jason M. Wood

	 Authorized Signatory

	 Name:
	 	 Jason M. Wood

Managing Director



 Accepted and confirmed: 
 Gilead Sciences, Inc. 

 

			
	 By:
	 	     /s/ Brett A. Pletcher

	 Name:
	 	 Brett A. Pletcher

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President and General Counsel
### §§687a–5 to 687b–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 687a–5, act May 14, 1898, ch. 299, §10, 30 Stat. 413, excepted certain islands.

Section 687a–6, acts Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §13, 26 Stat. 1100; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1144; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to surveys and deposits for covered lands.

Section 687b, act Aug. 30, 1949, ch. 521, §1, 63 Stat. 679, related to Alaskan lands subject to sale for industrial, commercial, and housing construction purposes.

Section 687b–1, act Aug. 30, 1949, ch. 521, §2, 63 Stat. 679, related to minimum selling price.

Section 687b–2, acts Aug. 30, 1949, ch. 521, §3, 63 Stat. 679; Oct. 21, 1976, Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(d), 90 Stat. 2791, related to liability for damages caused by mining and preservation of existing rights.

Section 687b–3, act Aug. 30, 1949, ch. 521, §4, 63 Stat. 679, related to inapplicability of certain provisions.

Section 687b–4, act Aug. 30, 1949, ch. 521, §5, 63 Stat. 679, related to promulgation of rules and regulations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.