alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FAMOUS
DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                       2,573,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    774,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,329,000
<PP&E>                                      35,313,353
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,853,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,789,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,346,000
<BONDS>                                      1,107,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    42,799,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,463,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,789,000
<SALES>                                     29,575,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,575,000
<CGS>                                       10,563,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,237,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (226,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,436,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,436,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (120,000)
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,556,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
        

</TABLE>
PROVENCHER & FLATT LLP 

823 SONOMA AVENUE 

SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 

(707) 284-2380 

1

Stipulation and Declaration re: withdrawal and Substitution Heatherly et al v. Piner Café at al

and Order Thereon Case No. CV 09 2730 JL

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROVENCHER & FLATT LLP 

Gail F. Flatt SBN [104422] 

823 Sonoma Avenue 

Santa Rosa, CA 95404-4714 

Telephone: (707) 284-2380 

Facsimile: (707) 284-2387 

Attorneys for Defendant Piner Café, LLC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAREN HEATHERLY and IRMA 

RAMIREZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PINER CAFÉ LLC, a limited liability 

company; RICHARD GATTI LLC, a 

limited liability company, and EDWARD 

GATTI LLC a limited liability company. 

 Defendants.

Case No. CV 09 2730-JL 

STIPULATION FOR WITHDRAWAL 

OF ATTORNEY, CONSENT TO 

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY, 

DECLARATION OF GAIL F. FLATT 

AND ORDER THEREON

 Defendant Piner Café LLC hereby stipulates to the withdrawal of its attorney, 

Tadd C. Aiona and the substitution of Gail F. Flatt as its new attorney in this 

action. 

Dated: April 8, 2010 PINER CAFÉ LLC 

 By: /s/ Chris Schilling 

 Chris Schilling 

 Manager 

DECLARATION OF GAIL F. FLATT 

 I, Gail F. Flatt, declare as follows: 

1. I am an attorney at law admitted to practice in the State of California 

Case 3:09-cv-02730-JL Document 9 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02730-JL Document8 Filed04/08/10 Page1 of 2
PROVENCHER & FLATT LLP 

823 SONOMA AVENUE 

SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 

(707) 284-2380 

2

Stipulation and Declaration re: withdrawal and Substitution Heatherly et al v. Piner Café at al

and Order Thereon Case No. CV 09 2730 JL

1

2

3

4

7

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

5

6

8

9

10

and in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California since 

December 1982. I make this declaration in support of the stipulation for 

withdrawal of Tadd C. Aiona and for substitution in this action. 

2. I have been retained by defendant Piner Café LLC to represent 

defendant’s interests in this action and have agreed to act as defendant Piner Café 

LLC’s attorney. 

3. Concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from 

signatory Chris Schilling for Piner Café LLC which shall serve in lieu of her 

signature on the document. I have maintained records to support this 

concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered. 

I declare under penalty under the laws of the United States that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 8, 2010 in Santa Rosa, California. 

 PROVENCHER & FLATT LLP 

 By: /s/ Gail F. Flatt 

 Gail F. Flatt (#104422) 

 Attorney for Defendant Piner Café LLC 

ORDER 

IT IS SO ORDERED

 _______________________________________ 

 James Larson 

 Chief Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-02730-JL Document 9 Filed 04/09/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02730-JL Document8 Filed04/08/10 Page2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES RIDGWAY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 08-cv-05221-SI 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION 

TO STAY DEADLINE TO SERVE 

SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT

Re: Dkt. No. 332

Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) has filed an administrative motion to stay 

the deadline to serve its supplemental expert report. Docket No. 332, Def.’s Mot. Plaintiffs’ 

supplemental expert report was due on July 12, 2016, and defendant’s supplemental expert report 

was due on July 19, 2016. Docket No. 320 at 2. Defendant now argues that plaintiffs’ 

supplemental expert report “go[es] far beyond the 42 new class members, and instead effect[s] 

wholesale rewrites of expert reports whose deadlines passed weeks ago.” Def.’s Mot. at 1. 

Defendant states that it will file a motion to strike plaintiff’s supplemental expert report by July 

22, 2016. Docket No. 332, Decl. of Jesse A. Cripps ¶ 12. In the meantime, defendant seeks a stay 

of its deadline to supplement its expert report, stating that its expert “will need at least until 

Friday, July 29, 2016 to complete a supplemental rebuttal report” but asking that the Court stay 

the deadline until after it rules on the motion to strike. Id. ¶¶ 11, 13.

Plaintiffs have filed an opposition, disputing Wal-Mart’s characterization of their 

supplemental expert report. Docket No. 333. They further state that they offered to stipulate to a 

one-week extension, making Wal-Mart’s supplemental expert report due on July 26, 2016. Id. at 

2. They also note that their expert is currently set to be deposed on July 26, 2016, which is the 

deadline that the Court set in its prior scheduling order. Id.; Docket No. 320 at 2.

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 334 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

Having considered the papers filed, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows. Wal-Mart shall 

have an extension of time to file its supplemental expert report from Dr. Jonathan Walker; WalMart may serve Dr. Walker’s supplemental report no later than July 29, 2016. Wal-Mart shall 

make Dr. Walker available for deposition within fourteen days of the service of his report. 

Plaintiffs shall have an extension of the deadline by which to make their expert, Dr. G. Michael 

Phillips, available for deposition until one week after Wal-Mart has served Dr. Walker’s 

supplemental report.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2016

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 334 Filed 07/20/16 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the General Management Plan, Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service announces the availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the General Management Plan for Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River, Texas. This is being done pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4332(C). 

# DATES:

                        The National Park Service will execute a Record of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30 days following publication by the Environmental Protection Agency of the notice of                               ( print page 77774)                            availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement are available from the Superintendent, John King, Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River, P.O. Box 129, Big Bend National Park, TX 79834-0129, (432) 477-1101. Public reading copies of the document will be available at the following locations: 

Office of the Superintendent, Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River, c/o Big Bend National Park,  1 Headquarters Dr.,  Big Bend National Park, TX 79834. 

NPS Intermountain Support Office, Planning and Environmental Quality, 12795 W. Alameda Parkway,  Lakewood, CO 80228,  Telephone: (303) 987-6671. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lou Good, Management Assistant, Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River, P.O. Box 129, Big Bend National Park, TX 79834-0129, 432-477-1103. 

Dated: November 3, 2004. 

Steven P. Martin, 

Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-28294 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-KF-P
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 8:30 PM
To: Culligan, Kevin
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: RE: DOE edits on RE

Ok. Thanks!

From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 8:02 PM
To: Higgins, Cortney
Cc: Wayland, Robertj Subject: DOE edits on RE

“...which is consistent with the cost range of $10 to $40 per metric ton of avoided CO2.” Add “not a carbon price” so it reads “...which is not a carbon price but is consistent with the cost range of $10 to $40 per metric ton of avoided CO2.”

Think it is already clear. Addressed the other requests
**Exhibit 13**

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

 

**Pursuant to**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code),each of the undersigned officers of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V. (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

**The Annual Report on**Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 20-F/A”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in the Form 20-F/A fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

 
|                      |   | /s/ Gerardo de Nicolás Gutierrez  |   |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Dated: June 28, 2007 |   |                                        |   |   |
|                 |   | Chief Executive  Officer                    |   |   |
|                 |   |                                        |   |   |
|                 |   | /s/ Alan  Castellanos Carmona               |   |   |
| Dated: June 28, 2007 |   |                                        |   |   |
|                 |   | Chief Financial  Officer                    |   |   |

** **

**A signed original of this written statement required by**Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request 

1

----
## SERVED: March 23, 2016

... '' •i;
.....-: ··. . ' 

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' ... ' l_. u ·, •'...J l • -' 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC -.: o '·. r--..- A '- ;

... ' u .. l**.~-** . i ; - .i**/~:** 

### 3 8
In The Matter Of: NORTHEASTERN AVIATION CORPORATION Respondent 

### ) ) ) ) ) 

### ) DocketNo. FAA-2015-0206
CaseNo. 2011EA110045


### ORDER SETTING FILING DEADLINE
On March 7, 2016, an Order Setting Second Pre-Hearing Status Conference ("Order") was filed. Among other things, this Order directed the parties to appear on March 22, 2016 (2:30 p.m. ET) for a Telephone Conference. (Order, 1,**~** 2.)
Pursuant to the March 7, 2016 Order, on March 22, 2016 the parties appearedby telephone for a Second Pre-Hearing Status Conference and discussed the status ofthe case. This Order codifies the oral rulings issued by the Court during the March.22, 2016 Conference. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205, and havingreviewedthe case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised;


### ITIS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Ifsettlement is reached, the parties shall file settlement documents on orbefore April 8,

. 2016. 2. In the absence ofany settlement filed on orbefore April 8, 2016, the parties shall file a short,jointly written Status Report. 3. The May 9, 2016 deadline, and other directives contained inthe June 18, 2015 Order · Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures are re:-confirmed. 4. The Hearing set in this case for June 14, 2016- June 16, 2016 is re-confirmed.

### 5. A Notice ofHearing Locationwill be issued separately, whichwill provide a full address and other courtroom and location details for the Hearing. 6. For clarifications ofthis Order orquestions with regard to theprocedures to be followed in this case, please contact Mrs. Rachel Brown, Judicial StaffAssistant, atthe Office of Hearings (202-366-2132).

Attachment: Service List

Page 2 of2

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration
. 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC:-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1



### Ms. CamilleJ. Castillo Complainant's Counsel ONE COPY



### Office ofRegionalCounsel, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration , 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. Edward J. 

### Longosz II Ms. Evelyn D. Sahr Respondent's Counsel 

### Eckert Seamans Cherin & 

### Mellott, LLC 12thFloor 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 TEL: 202-659-6619/6622 FAX:202-659-6699 Judge J.E. Sullivan US. Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-0206 (Civil Penalty Action)

1Service was by U.S. Mail. Forservice in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGG-430.
#### County of Putnam, Respondent, v. Charles F. Schneider et al., Defendants. Nased Corporation, Appellant.

— In a proceeding instituted under the provisions of the Highway Law, the defendant Nased Corporation appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated February 5, 1960, and entered in Putnam County on February 18, 1960, as on reargument adheres to a prior determination confirming the report of three Commissioners of Appraisal awarding $510 to said defendant and others for the taking for public use of certain lands designated in the petition as Parcels XIV and XV. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 242.35 Mortgage lien certifications. At initial and/or final endorsement of the mortgage note, each of the following requirements must be met: ( a ) The mortgage is the first lien upon and covers all of the property used in the operation of the entire hospital;
( b ) The property upon which the improvements have been made or constructed and the equipment financed with mortgage proceeds are free and clear of all liens other than the insured mortgage and such other secondary liens as may be approved by HUD;
( c ) The Security Agreement and Uniform Commercial Code filings establish a first lien on the personalty of the mortgagor, including but not limited to equipment acquired with mortgage proceeds or otherwise not subject to a prior lien;
( d ) The mortgagor has notified HUD in writing of all unpaid obligations in connection with the mortgage transaction, the purchase of the mortgaged property, the construction, limited rehabilitation, or substantial rehabilitation of the project, or the purchase of the equipment financed with mortgage proceeds.
[72 FR 67546, Nov. 28, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 35923, June 25, 2008; 78 FR 8343, Feb. 5, 2013]
### §30530. Liability as master, officer, or seaman not affected

This chapter does not affect the liability of an individual as a master, officer, or seaman, even though the individual is also an owner of the vessel.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1516, §30512; renumbered §30530, Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11503(a)(3), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4130.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30512 | 46 App.:187. | R.S. §4287. |

Section

This section is substituted for the source provision for consistency with the restatement of 46 App. U.S.C. 183(a) and 189 in section 30505 and to eliminate unnecessary words. The reference in the source to particular sections is extended to include the entire chapter to simplify the reference and to conform to the obvious original policy and intent of the source provision.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 renumbered section 30512 of this title as this section.
#### GLOBE LITHOGRAPHING CO. v. BIMBERG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

Municipal Court—Submission of Cause—Judgment—Nature and Form.

Where the issues in a cause involving purely questions of fact were submitted to the court on conflicting evidence, a judgment rendered in favor of defendants, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with costs, amounted to a mere nonsuit, and was therefore erroneous, the parties being entitled to a judgment on the merits.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Action by the Globe Lithographing Company against Meyer R. Bimberg and others. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of •defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, O’GORMAN, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Atwater & Cruikshank (Douglas McKee, of counsel), for appellant.

William E. Hills, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The issues in this case involved purely questions •of fact, upon which both parties gave conflicting testimony. .At the ■close of the entire case the court below reserved its decision, but •finally rendered a judgment in favor of the defendants, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint with costs. This was error. Such a disposition ■of the case is to be taken as a nonsuit. The parties are entitled to a judgment upon the merits, and this court cannot be called upon to determine the issues presented, or the weight of evidence bearing thereon, until the same has been passed upon by the court below. Schlesinger v. Jud, 61 App. Div. 453, 70 N. Y. Supp. 616; Johnson v. Duncan, 98 App. Div. 322, 90 N. Y. Supp. 660.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of International Securities
Exchange, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bruce Cooperman, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ BRUCE COOPERMANName:

Bruce CoopermanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




Date: March 20, 2006



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to International Securities Exchange, Inc. and will be retained by International Securities Exchange, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|** | This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------