alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 58.32 Project aggregation. ( a ) A responsible entity must group together and evaluate as a single project all individual activities which are related either on a geographical or functional basis, or are logical parts of a composite of contemplated actions.
( b ) In deciding the most appropriate basis for aggregation when evaluating activities under more than one program, the responsible entity may choose: *functional aggregation* when a specific type of activity (e.g., water improvements) is to take place in several separate locales or jurisdictions; *geographic aggregation* when a mix of dissimilar but related activities is to be concentrated in a fairly specific project area (e.g., a combination of water, sewer and street improvements and economic development activities); or *a combination of aggregation approaches,* which, for various project locations, considers the impacts arising from each functional activity and its interrelationship with other activities.
( c ) The purpose of project aggregation is to group together related activities so that the responsible entity can: ( 1 ) Address adequately and analyze, in a single environmental review, the separate and combined impacts of activities that are similar, connected and closely related, or that are dependent upon other activities and actions. (See 40 CFR 1508.25(a)).
( 2 ) Consider reasonable alternative courses of action.
( 3 ) Schedule the activities to resolve conflicts or mitigate the individual, combined and/or cumulative effects.
( 4 ) Prescribe mitigation measures and safeguards including project alternatives and modifications to individual activities.
( d ) *Multi-year project aggregation* — ( 1 ) *Release of funds.* When a recipient's planning and program development provide for activities to be implemented over two or more years, the responsible entity's environmental review should consider the relationship among all component activities of the multi-year project regardless of the source of funds and address and evaluate their cumulative environmental effects. The estimated range of the aggregated activities and the estimated cost of the total project must be listed and described by the responsible entity in the environmental review and included in the RROF. The release of funds will cover the entire project period.
( 2 ) When one or more of the conditions described in § 58.47 exists, the recipient or other responsible entity must re-evaluate the environmental review.
§ 700.165 Evaluation of Congregate Housing Services Programs. ( a ) Grantees shall submit annually to the Secretary concerned, a report evaluating the impact and effectiveness of CHSPs at the grant sites, in such form as the Secretary concerned shall require.
( b ) The Secretaries concerned shall further review and evaluate the performance of CHSPs at these sites and shall evaluate the Program as a whole.
( c ) Each grantee shall submit a certification with its application, agreeing to cooperate with and to provide requested data to the entity responsible for the Program's evaluation, if requested to do so by the Secretary concerned.
### §476. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1029

Section, act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, §5, 32 Stat. 389, provided for payment of construction charges to register and receiver of local land office.
§ 3280.813 Outdoor outlets, fixtures, air-conditioning equipment, etc. ( a ) Outdoor fixtures and equipment shall be listed for use in wet locations, except that if located on the underside of the home or located under roof extensions or similarly protected locations, they may be listed for use in damp locations.
( b ) A manufactured home provided with a branch circuit designed to energize outside heating equipment or air-conditioning equipment, other than room air conditioners, or both, located outside the manufactured home, other than room air conditioners, must have such branch-circuit conductors terminate in a listed outlet box, or disconnecting means, located on the outside of the manufactured home. ( 1 ) A label must be permanently affixed adjacent to the outlet box. The label must be not less than 0.020-inches thick etched brass, stainless steel, anodized or alclad aluminum, or equivalent, and must not be less than 3 inches × 13 ⁄ 4 inches in size.
( 2 ) ( i ) The label must include the correct voltage and ampere rating and the following information: THIS CONNECTION IS FOR HEATING AND/OR AIR-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT. THE BRANCH CIRCUIT IS RATED AT NOT MORE THAN____AMPERES, AT____VOLTS, 60-HERTZ,____CONDUCTOR AMPACITY. A DISCONNECTING MEANS IS LOCATED WITHIN SIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
( ii ) The correct voltage and ampere rating shall be given. The tag must be not less than 0.020-inches thick etched brass, stainless steel, anodized or alclad aluminum, or equivalent. The tag must have a minimum size of not less than 3 inches × 13 ⁄ 4 inches.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 961, Jan. 4, 1977. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 58 FR 55021, Oct. 25, 1993; 78 FR 73992, Dec. 9, 2013]
### §511. Opening bids; bonds

The sealed proposals to furnish paper and envelopes shall be opened in the presence of the Joint Committee on Printing who shall award the contracts to the lowest and best bidder for the interest of the Government. The committee 1 may not consider a proposal that is not accompanied by a bond with security or certified check in the amount of $5,000, guaranteeing that the bidder if his proposal is accepted, will enter into a formal contract with the United States to furnish the paper or envelopes specified. The Committee may not consider a proposal from a person unknown to it unless accompanied by satisfactory evidence that he is a manufacturer of or dealer in the description of paper or envelopes proposed to be furnished.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1244.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §7 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §5, 28 Stat. 602; June 16, 1938, ch. 477, §3, 52 Stat. 761).

1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ KIMBERLY K. SCHAEFERKimberly K. SchaeferChief Executive Officer
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

USGS Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program

# Time-Series Photographs of the Sea Floor in Western Massachusetts Bay: June 1998 to May 1999

**U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 96**2004

*Bradford Butman, P. Soupy Alexander, and Michael H. Bothner*

U.S. Geological Survey

Woods Hole, MA  02543

----

Skip Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey |		Coastal and Marine Geology		URL: cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/publications/ds-96/index.html		Page Contact Information: CMGDS Team		Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 06-Dec-2017 11:23:04 EST
### UTILITY AERIAL SERVICE S 23000 Sussex Hwy. #226 Seaford, DE 19973 855-973-6476 

### September 1, 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
RE: Exemption No. 11237 (FAA-2014-0591) Utility Aerial Services, Inc. This letter is a request for amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 11237 to add additional aircraft to the exemption holders authorized commercial operations. On March 26, 2014, the FAA granted this Petition for Exemption to conduct commercial operations using small unmanned aircraft systems. Utility Aerial Services, Inc. now seeks an amendment to its exemption authorizing the operation of the Inspec Tools X-8. The FAA has previously granted operations of the Inspec Tools X-8 (exemption 12588). The addition of these aircraft will enhance Utility Aerial Services operational capabilities without any change to the safe conduct of operations.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this request for amendment. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions. Regard

William R. Alex President/CEO Utility Aerial Services, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 20-1378

MAISHA EMMANUEL,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

HANDY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 22, 2021, is amended 

as follows: 

On p. 11, line 17, replace "Moreover, we" with "We".

On p. 13, line 12, replace "indicate" with "indicates".
### §425b. Receipt of project water by lessees of irrigable lands owned by States, etc.; time limitation; applicability of acreage limitations

Lessees of irrigable lands owned by States, political subdivisions, and agencies thereof which are held to be subject to the acreage limitation provisions of Federal reclamation law and for which recordable contracts to sell have not been made may receive project water from July 7, 1970, subject to the same acreage limitation provisions of Federal reclamation law as private landowners.

(Pub. L. 91–310, §3, July 7, 1970, 84 Stat. 411; Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §224(d), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1272.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation law, referred to in text, probably means act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, and Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto. See section 425 of this title. Act June 17, 1902, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of act June 17, 1902, to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–293 struck out "for a period not to exceed twenty-five years" after "may receive project water".
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-41379 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUAN ALBERTO VARGAS-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1150-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed t o represent Juan Alberto VargasGonzalez h as moved f or leave to withdraw and has f i l ed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 (5th Cir. 2011). Vargas-Gonzalez h as not filed a r esponse. W e have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r elevant p ortions of the record reflected therein. We c oncur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-41379 Document: 00512420097 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013No. 12-41379

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-41379 Document: 00512420097 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
§ 573.3 Eligible activities. Guaranteed Loan Funds may be used by a Borrower for the following activities when it is certified in accordance with § 573.6(e) that the activity is necessary to address damage caused by an act or acts of arson or terrorism as certified in accordance with § 573.6(f): ( a ) Acquisition of improved or unimproved real property in fee or under long term lease.
( b ) Acquisition and installation of personal property.
( c ) Rehabilitation of real property owner, acquired, or leased by the Borrower.
( d ) Construction, reconstruction, or replacement of real property improvement.
( e ) Clearance, demolition, and removal, including movement of structures to other sites, of buildings, fixtures and improvements on real property.
( f ) Site preparation, including construction, reconstruction, or installation of site improvements, utilities, or facilities, which is related to the activities described in paragraph (a), (c), or (d) of this section.
( g ) Architectural, engineering, and similar services necessary to develop plans in connection with activities financed under paragraph (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
( h ) Acquisition, installation and restoration of security systems.
( i ) Loans for refinancing existing indebtedness secured by a property which has been or will be acquired, constructed, rehabilitated or reconstructed, if such financing is determined to be appropriate to achieve the objectives of the Act and this part.
( j ) Other necessary project costs such as insurance, bonding, legal fees, appraisals, surveys, relocation, closing costs, etc., paid or incurred by the Borrower in connection with the completion of the above activities.
[61 FR 47405, Sept. 6, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 24574, May 6, 1997]
### §10904. Refusal to proceed

After a judgment under section 10903 of this title that a vessel is fit to proceed on the intended voyage, or after the order of a judgment to make up deficiencies is complied with, if a seaman does not proceed on the voyage, the unpaid wages of the seaman are forfeited.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 576.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10904 | 46:655 |

Section 10904 provides that if a vessel is found fit to proceed by a judge or justice of the peace and a seaman refuses to proceed, the seaman shall forfeit any unpaid wages.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40089 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. GILBERTO CHAVEZ-SIFUENTES Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-683-1
Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * GilbertoC havez-Sifuentes appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States following a prior deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Chavez-Sifuentes argues that the district court erred in imposing a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because his prior Texas conviction for aggravated assault is not a crime ofviolence under the Sentencing Guidelines. He contends that the Texas crime of aggravated assault has a broader definition than most other definitions of aggravated assault United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D February 19, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-40089

2 because it may be committed by threatening the victim with a weapon. The Texas statute, T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN
. § 22.02, is substantially simi lar to the definition of“aggravated assault” under the Model Penal Code and thus qualifies
as the enumerated offense of “aggravated assault” under the Guidelines. See United States v. Guillen-Alvarez, 489 F.3d 197, 199-201 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 418 (2007). In light ofApprendi v. NewJersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Chavez-Sifuentes challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the of fense that must be found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 872 (Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §102. Joint Committee on Printing: succession; powers during recess

The members of the Joint Committee on Printing who are reelected to the succeeding Congress shall continue as members of the committee until their successors are chosen. The President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, on the last day of a Congress, appoint members of their respective Houses who have been elected to the succeeding Congress to fill vacancies which may then be about to occur on the Committee, and the appointees and members of the Committee who have been reelected shall continue until their successors are chosen.

When Congress is not in session, the Joint Committee may exercise all its powers and duties as when Congress is in session.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1238.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §2 (Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 189, §1, 28 Stat. 962; Mar. 3, 1917, ch. 163, §6, 39 Stat. 1121).

Changes are made in phraseology.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-174-2020]

On October 5, 2020, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Bridgeport Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 76, requesting an expansion of Subzone 76A subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 76, on behalf of ASML US, LLC, in Wilton, Connecticut.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (85 FR 63505, October 8, 2020). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 76A was approved on November 25, 2020, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 76's 476-acre activation limit.                

Dated: November 25, 2020.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26578 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### A. L. Bierbauer, administrator of the estate of J. H. Bierbauer, deceased, appellee, v. Joseph Werner, appellant.

Suit for commissions on sale of farm. Judgment for amount claimed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county; the Hon. Edward Barry, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 23, 1923.

Chas. M. Peirce, for appellant. Morrissey, Sullivan & Rust, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 12, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01641-CV 

IN RE WESLEY WAYNE SAVANNAH, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F09-72992-U 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald 

The Court has before it relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus seeking relief under 

article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure from his 2010 conviction for burglary of a 

habitation with intent to commit aggravated assault. The facts and issues are known to the 

parties, so we need not recite them herein. This Court has no jurisdiction over post-conviction 

applications for writ of habeas under article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. arts. 11.05, 

11.07 (West 2005); In re McFee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717–18 (Tex. App.––Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, 

orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the application for writ of habeas 

corpus. 

131641F.P05 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
PIGEON POINT QUADRANGLE

aN
oP
CALIFORNIA— SAN MATEO CO. oly?
i
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) “
NW/4 ANO NUEVO 15’ QUADRANGLE v
°30' 1558 1V SW SAN FRANCISCO (CITY HALL) 45 MI. PESCADERO 0.8 MI. epoIRgn
» b22°39’ 1 245000. [546 [a7 27130" [549 (SAN GREGORIO) 51) | 25' A SAN GREGORIO 6.2 mi. [253 564) 1.450000 FEET R5 W955 122°22'R0'
37°15’ 9 + DW) NJ : ; r Ta 37715
1
SAN Al (o
| 7 TBS.
| a |
17700 " PESCADERO
oo | #122
208
5 g
° z
° 2
£ 3
a1 a 7
"21 ig
“ pr E
Pagegidero High-Power, 5
joming Station a
ca Le
ey.
119 (( as 1270 000 j
rroyo tRe Los FEET |
ag] |
ag
18
7 18
12'30" —{12’30"
Zz
g
& 2
< =
s :
r g
a
al 4” Z
aly gen :
mi
5 .
116/ 1S wy
we t
zs :
Je
38
&
&
33 -
e8 .
N
Be '
ge 2
ays] [$2 7
Se
Rocks %
#o*
aya] [4 j
10" 10°
ag3t {_
a3
| {
a2 | i
a2 ,
|
on] ft
an
240 000 |
FEET
aio |
a0
; 3
2199] +199000m.N,
37°0 " \ abo 2
°07'30" _ "307 wy 7 INTERIGR—SEOLOGICAL SURVEY WASHINGTON, 0, cL 18S *07'30"
122°30" Te45 11420000 Feet sag Tsq7 548!27'30" | Teg ano NUEVA 1:62 500) Ts51 ul 25° Ts52 F953 9 wrench wat Sunk ores 122°22'40"
rales gs Prekvoe! by fe Noto Service compile rom INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS SCALE 1:24000 NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION AN
: ROGRAPHIC INDEX 40
Funding support by the California Department of Boating and Waterways. 1 3 o 1 MILE 4
ding super bye Cole cf Boating ond 4 HYD SURVEY 7
Polyconic projection = 4 122"30 1222230" . oD {
10,000 foot grid based on California coordinate system, zone 3 1000 ° 1000 2000-30040 == 5000=S000S«000 ‘ET arts aris sunvey SURVEY sunvey UNE SPacING SE
1000 - meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, zone 10. 1927 North BAN GREGORIO, ae a NUMBER DATE SCALE (Nat. ls)
American Datum, To place on the predicted North American Datum 1983 +5245 902-33 1140000 oo
move the projection lines 6 meters noth and 96 meters east as shown by 1 5 0 1 KILOMETER 14-5287 1932 4:10,000 02-10
hed ecemceficke, a 15296 502-4 440'000, 210
BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVALS: 2 METERS TO MAXIMUM DEPTI
SUPPLEMENTED BY | METER INTERVALS. W208 PIGEON POINT, CALIF.
NW/4 ANO NUEVO 15’ GUADRANGLE
N3707.5W 12222.5/7.5
* DATUM: MEAN LOWER LOW WATER
PIGEON POINT FRANKLIN POINT 1955
on NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 H-5245 puotonewero 1968
| BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA COMPLIES WITH INTERNATIONAL HYDROGRAPHIC
| / oe ORGANIZATION (IHO} SPECIAL PUBLICATION 44 ACCURACY STANDARDS AMS 1958 II NW-SERIES V895
120 James ‘AND/OR STANDARDS USED AT THE DATE OF THE SURVEY +5287
SHORELINE SHOWN REPRESENTS THE APPROXIMATE LINE OF MEAN HIGH WATER
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO DATUMS IS VARIABLE '37°07'30" 37°07'30"
West or THE AVERAGE RANGE OF TIDES IS APPROXIMATELY 4 FEET 22°30" 4120°22'30"
UTM GRID AND 1968 MAGNETIC NORTH |ANO NUEVO /ANO NUEVO

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

NOLWHOdHOD GIOH NVId

°
=
g
F4

(09 GIGH NVId

3
S

VINHOSNVO ‘SNIAWT*

NOLWeOd

VINHOSMVS “SNIAHL

53 CGH Nid

5
3
|
4
B

|
|
|
|
|
|