alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §421a. Construction of distribution and drainage systems by irrigation districts or public agencies

Distribution and drainage systems authorized to be constructed under the Federal reclamation laws may, in lieu of construction by the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in sections 421a to 421h of this title as the "Secretary"), be constructed by irrigation districts or other public agencies according to plans and specifications approved by the Secretary as provided in sections 421a to 421h of this title. The drainage systems referred to in sections 421a to 421h of this title are those required for collection and removal of excess irrigation water, either on or below the surface of the ground and do not include enlargement or alteration of existing waterways for disposition or natural runoff.

(July 4, 1955, ch. 271, §1, 69 Stat. 244; Pub. L. 92–487, Oct. 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 804.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1972—Pub. L. 92–487 substituted provisions relating to construction of distribution and drainage systems, for provisions relating to construction of irrigation systems, and inserted provisions setting forth the type of drainage systems subject to coverage of sections 421a to 421h of this title.
#### FLOORSHEIM v. MUSICAL COURIER CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Otto Floorsheim against the Musical Courier Company. No opinion. Motion denied, on payment of $10 costs. See memorandum.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

AS MODIFIED

Judge James Ware

8/11/2010

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 7
September 10, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 7
September 19, 2011

at 9:00 AM 

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 4 of 7
IT IS SO ORDERD:

In light of this Order, the Court vacates the August 23, 2010 Case Management Conference. 

The Court sets an interim Case Management Conference for October 18, 2010 at 10:00 AM. 

On or before October 8, 2010, the parties shall file a joint Case Management Conference 

statement updating the Court on the status of all settlement and discovery efforts. 

Dated: August 11, 2010 ____________________________________ 

 United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 370 Filed 08/11/10 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of SouFun Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Lanying Guan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 5, 2012



/s/ Lanying GuanName:

Lanying GuanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### § 401.554 Contract renewal and administration.

HUD will offer to renew section 8 contracts as provided in each Restructuring Plan, subject to the availability of appropriations and subject to the renewal authority available at the time of each contract expiration. The offer will be made by HUD directly or through a PAE that has contracted with HUD to be a contract administrator for such contracts. HUD will offer to any PAE that is qualified to be the section 8 contract administrator the opportunity to serve as the section 8 contract administrator for a project restructured under a Restructuring Plan developed by the PAE under the Mark-to-Market Program. Qualifications will be determined under both statutory requirements and requirements issued by the appropriate office within HUD, depending on the type of section 8 assistance that is provided.

[65 FR 15485, Mar. 22, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 53901, Sept. 6, 2000; 89 FR 14590, Feb. 28, 2024]
#### David D. Jayne et al., Appellants, *v.*Ezra C. Jayne, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.

(Submitted October 25, 1881;

decided November 29, 1881.)

*J. A. Christie*for appellants.

*C.*H. *Everts*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.4**








**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      Peter
      J. Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of Prestige Brands International, LLC on Form 10-K for the year
      ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      applicable, and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents
      in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      Prestige Brands International, LLC.









**/s/PETER
                J. ANDERSON**Name:Peter
                J. AndersonTitle:*Chief
                Financial Officer*Date:June
                14, 2006
Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 02, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20A0863. BENJAMIN J. MAXWELL v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On February 12, 2020, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than February 24, 2020. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).

Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate 

review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 

264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995):

This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a 

brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while 

you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's 

failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, 

you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time 

appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will 

have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the 

trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the 

trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days 

from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a 

notice of appeal from that order.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 02, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to 

the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy 

of this order to the appellant.
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00327-CV Fr ancisco

Muril lo Gonzales , Appellant v. Intelecom, Inc., Appell

ee FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200T H JUDICIAL DIST RICT NO. GN00 2419, HON ORABLE SUZ ANNE C OVINGTON , JUDGE P RESIDIN G PER CURIAM

Appe llantFranci

sco Muril lo Gonzal es, through hi s counsel

of record, has i

nf ormed t his Court that he i s unab le to further pursue h i s ap peal , that he h as i

ns tructed th e di stri ct court cl erk that a cler k’s r eco rd sho uld no t be pr epa re d, and t hat dismissal of his ap pea l is appr op riat e. We construe appe l l an

t’s cor re sp on den ce

as a m oti on to dismiss and acc ordi

ngl y , di sm i ss th e app eal . See Tex . R. A pp. P. 42 .1(a)(2 ). Bef ore Chi ef J

ustice A boussie, Justices

B. A. Sm ith an d Puryear Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: Septembe

r 13, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
### §663. Inspection of accounts, books, etc., of railroad receiving financial assistance

The Secretary is authorized to, and shall as necessary, inspect and copy all accounts, books, records, memorandums, correspondence, and other documents of any railroad which has received financial assistance under this chapter concerning any matter which may bear upon (1) the ability of such railroad to repay the loan within the time fixed therefor, (2) the interest of the United States in the property of such railroad, and (3) to insure that the purpose of this chapter is being carried out.

(Pub. L. 91–663, §4, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1976.)
EXHIBIT 23.1

|        |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | 1900 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite East 210Boca Raton, FL 33431Tel: 561.886.4200Fax: 561.886.3330email: info@sherbcpa.com    Offices in New York and Florida |
|        |

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Certified Public Accountants

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of DirectorsMDwerks, Inc.

We hereby consent to the use in Form 10-KSB/A of our report dated February 9, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements of MDwerks, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended.

|  | Certified Public Accountants |
|--|------------------------------|

April 5, 2007

----
**Exhibit 12(a)(2)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Cleofas HinojosaSaenz, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-Fof Desarrolladora Homex, S.A. de C.V.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The company’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the company and have:

 

a.  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

b.  evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.  disclosed in this report any change in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  The company’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee ofcompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.  all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.  any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | /s/ Cleofas Hinojosa  Saenz |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Name:                       | Cleofas Hinojosa Saenz |
|   | Title:                      | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                        |   |
|   |                        |   |
| Date:  | June 28, 2005          |   |   |
|        |                             |  |  |

 

----
### Part C—Load Lines of Vessels

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Part C contains provisions that apply to load lines. A load line is a mark drawn on a vessel that indicates whether a vessel is overloaded. Load line requirements for international voyages are based not only on domestic law but also the 1966 International Load Line Convention.
Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC   Document 302   Filed 08/13/10   Page 1 of 3

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC   Document 302   Filed 08/13/10   Page 2 of 3

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC   Document 302   Filed 08/13/10   Page 3 of 3

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T09:19:07-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
| **Segment Reporting - Narrative (Details)**    | 3 Months Ended                      |
|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
||
| **Segment Reporting Information [Line Items]** |                                |
| Number Of Segments                             | 4us-gaap_NumberOfReportableSegments |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of segments reported by the entity. A reportable segment is a component of an entity for which there is an accounting requirement to report separate financial information on that component in the entity's financial statements.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_NumberOfReportableSegments**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_SegmentReportingInformationLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Document

Exhibit 4.5

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
CARDINAL HEALTH 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN
(As Amended and Restated January 1, 2020)


Background Information


A.    Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal Health”) previously adopted and currently maintains the Cardinal Health 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of employees of Cardinal Health and its subsidiaries and affiliates.


B.    Section 12.02 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended at any time through a written resolution adopted or approved by the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Cardinal Health.


C.    The CEO desires to amend the Plan to change the amount of Safe Harbor Matching Contributions to be provided with respect to pay dates occurring on and after July 1, 2020.


Amendment of the Cardinal Health 401(k) Savings Plan


The Plan is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of July 1, 2020.


1.    Section 3.07(B)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the second sentence thereof in its entirety as follows:


“Specifically, on and after July 1, 2020, the Employer shall match 200% of each Participant’s Compensation Deferral Contributions that do not exceed 1% of the Participant’s Compensation, and 50% of each Participant’s Compensation Deferral Contributions that exceed 1% of the Participant’s Compensation but do not exceed 5% of the Participant’s Compensation.”


2.    A new Section 3.07(E) is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:


“E.    2020 Safe Harbor Matching Contributions.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 3.07 or the Plan to the contrary, with respect to the Plan Year ending December 31, 2020:


(i)    the Plan shall satisfy the actual deferral percentage (ADP) test as set forth under Code Section 401(k)(3), using the current year testing method described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.401(k)-2(a)(2)(ii); and


(ii)    the Plan shall satisfy the actual contribution percentage (ACP) test as set forth under Code Section 401(m)(2), using the current year testing method described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.401(m)-2(a)(2)(ii).”












3.    All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.




CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




By:      /s/ Michael C. Kaufmann        


Date:      5/29/20
#### § 401.406 Execution of Restructuring Commitment.

When HUD approves the Restructuring Commitment, the PAE will deliver the Restructuring Commitment to the owner for execution. The Restructuring Commitment becomes binding upon execution by the owner. An owner who does not execute the Restructuring Commitment may appeal its terms and seek modification under subpart F of this part.
#### § 203.25 Late charge.

The mortgage may provide for the collection by the mortgagee of a late charge, not to exceed four per cent of the amount of each payment more than 15 days in arrears, to cover servicing and other costs attributable to the receipt of payments from mortgagors after the date upon which payment is due.

[41 FR 49734, Nov. 10, 1976]
### **CHAPTER 77—SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION**

Sec.
7701.
General.
7702.
Administrative procedure.
7703.
Bases for suspension or revocation.
7704.
Dangerous drugs as grounds for revocation.
7704a.
Sexual harassment or sexual assault as grounds for suspension or revocation.
7705.
Subpenas and oaths.
7706.
Drug testing reporting.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVI, §11603(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4148, added item 7704a.

**2004**—Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, §414(b), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1047, added item 7706.
Michigan Supreme Court
Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr.
Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

d0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

136982(56)

GWENDOLYN MINGO, CITIZENS OF BRUSH PARK, REVEREND MARY GAUSE, WARREN GAITHER, DOROTHY ROBINSON, MARCIA BURNETTE NICHOLS, PATTY BURNETTE JONES, and ANDREW J. BURNETTE, JR., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

BRUSH PARK CITIZENS DISTRICT COUNCIL, KEITH NOBLE, LEON THOMAS, RUTH DIGGS, QUENTIN MINGO, ERNESTINE NOBLE, DEACON LEON THOMAS, MARILYN REED, GRACE DAVIS, DR. BARBARA WOMACK, FAYE DAVIS, MABEL NORA, REVEREND VELMA ROSEMUND, DOUGLAS FULLER, FRANK FULLER, ANNIE JACKSON, NATHANIEL JACKSON, and REVEREND ORA MARIE CLAY, Plaintiffs,

v SC: 136982

COA: 277403 Wayne CC: 00-013030-CZ CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s November

25, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order
was entered erroneously.
### **CHAPTER 85—PILOTS**

Sec.
8501.
State regulation of pilots.
8502.
Federal pilots required.
8503.
Federal pilots authorized.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Chapter 85 provides for State pilotage to be regulated by the States and only in conformity with the laws of the States. It clearly spells out the preeminence of the State's role in regulating pilots for vessels operating on the bays, rivers, harbors, and ports of the United States. However, those vessels that are required to have a Federally licensed pilot, those that operate on waters outside the territorial sea of the United States, and those that operate on waters of the Great Lakes are not subject to State pilotage laws or requirements. In essence this chapter, with minor changes, confirms the State and Federal relationship with respect to pilotage that has evolved since the founding of the Nation.

This chapter permits the continuation of Federal pilotage requirements for vessels that are not required to obtain compulsory State pilotage. It confirms the practice of allowing anyone with a Federal pilotage endorsement for the waters in which the vessel is operating to be in control of a vessel when engaged in the coastwide trade. It also confirms the practice of using Federal pilots that are often organized into groups or working organizations who offer their expertise and services to vessels that are not required to obtain compulsory State pilotage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1984**—Pub. L. 98–557, §29(f)(3)(B), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2874, added item 8503.
Exhibit 10.3(a)


 



Partial
Waiver of Compensation Upon Termination


 


I,
Steven Staehr, (“Employee”), as of November 02, 2022, hereby agree to waive and terminate 83,333 common shares of Adamas One
Corp. stock out of the 200,000 common shares of Adamas One stock, due under Section 9(d) of my Executive Employment Agreement with
Adamas One Corp. (“Employer”), if and when I am terminated by the Employer. Employee hereby irrevocably waives any and all
claims, demands, suits, actions, causes of action and rights whatsoever at law or in equity, now existing or arising relating to
this Partial Waiver of Compensation Upon Termination.


 


AGREED
AND ACCEPTED TO:


 


	/s/
    Steven Staehr	 
	Steven Staehr