alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §11102. Medicine chests

(a) A vessel of the United States on a voyage from a port in the United States to a foreign port (except to a Canadian port), and a vessel of the United States of at least 75 gross tons as measured under section 14502 of this title, or an alternate tonnage measured under section 14302 of this title as prescribed by the Secretary under section 14104 of this title on a voyage between a port of the United States on the Atlantic Ocean and Pacific Ocean, shall be provided with a medicine chest.

(b) The owner and master of a vessel not equipped as required by subsection (a) of this section or a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) are liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of $500. If the offense was due to the fault of the owner, a master penalized under this section has the right to recover the penalty and costs from the owner.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 578; Pub. L. 104–324, title VII, §741, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3942.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11102(a) | 46:666 |
| 11102(b) | 46:667 |

Section 11102 requires that a United States vessel on a foreign or intercoastal domestic voyage be equipped with a medicine chest, and provides a penalty for noncompliance. The Committee intends that regulation will provide for a well stocked medicine chest adequate for the crew of a vessel.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–324 inserted "as measured under section 14502 of this title, or an alternate tonnage measured under section 14302 of this title as prescribed by the Secretary under section 14104 of this title" after "75 gross tons".
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW CALVIN COLEY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CASIM, Doctor, Lancaster State Prison; 

TRAQUINA, Doctor, Solano State Prison,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-17114

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00934-PMPGWF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Andrew Calvin Coley appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

MAY 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-17114

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th

Cir. 2004), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record, Johnson v.

Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP, 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Coley failed

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants consciously

disregarded a risk to Coley’s health by failing to provide an adequate diet for his

colitis or delaying diagnostic tests that ruled out a more serious illness. See

Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1058 (prison officials are deliberately indifferent only if they

know of and disregard an excessive risk of serious harm to inmate health). Coley’s

disagreement with defendants’ medical opinion as to his diagnosis or course of

treatment is not sufficient to constitute deliberate indifference. See id.

The district court’s failure to rule on Coley’s motions to compel further

discovery to oppose one of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is not

grounds for reversal because Coley failed to show how additional discovery would

have precluded summary judgment. See Chance v. Pac-Tel Teletrac Inc., 242 F.3d

1151, 1161 n.6 (9th Cir. 2001) (to obtain discovery pending summary judgment,

movant must have diligently pursued discovery and show how additional discovery

would preclude summary judgment); Margolis v. Ryan, 140 F.3d 850, 853 (9th Cir.
3 09-17114

1998) (motion to compel discovery to oppose summary judgment on which the

district court failed to rule is reviewed de novo). 

Coley’s remaining contentions, including those concerning alleged due

process violations, are unpersuasive.

Coley’s requests for miscellaneous relief, including concerning access to the

law library, are denied.

AFFIRMED.
### §11302. Manner of making entries

Each entry made in the official logbook—

(1) shall be made as soon as possible after the occurrence;

(2) if not made on the day of the occurrence, shall be dated and state the date of the occurrence;

(3) if the entry is about an occurrence happening before the vessel's arrival at the final port of discharge, shall be made not later than 24 hours after the arrival;

(4) shall be signed by the master; and

(5) shall be signed by the chief mate or another seaman.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 581.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11302 | 46:202 |

Section 11302 describes the manner in which entries shall be made in the logbook, specifying when they shall be made, who shall sign them, and requiring that they shall be dated.
Oe
DC eel
OP IEG

ERVIN

le :

. ei j

")

S

WM

w

y

h = 7 oo! ee / ;
: s s ; L Sf —/ 7}
= is | /— |
bided . f\ is . . . . v/ > CS |
; } : & Ue 2 A, : .
e° . ze 7 .
in g| : . ’ ee / fC. k
5 2 ’ | | :
7 . § F Seos gates .
ad a | _ . gee ¥ Ske = 2 ayy RCs
3 . ] 2902 ve yey)
§ a *s )) Ze)
& My) s
FG . / ee (

OUYSS:

a

ie

qe
ra
ee.

as) Da
“i 3

Pai

ie

\

‘
:
/

SS

MME

f

fl

h

yt

5 SSS

ee
‘BRE

=
——s
a
—

aa) LA
G2

IR

Ls tf

Kaw: 10s, XO ag |

PS

Lf “en

4%

v]

(

x
ai > 2 el :
Ce

A
——_———_—_— SSS pos VATE
eeu 27 ee 2

NS
=
Qe

WY

| a7 ae 2 7 ~ R77 > nC OIE ISK \
2 ee WS (SES? ie a Di
Ce PA

\ |

oe 7

f

\\

‘

GR }
eS

2
on

WW OSES

ee
ON

00-4 (\ _ i
66440 8 i t|

WZ

CAA

Wa

4
S
fs
So = ys
¢ é ;
& ey, :
S
2
= 2
3
‘
c »

win ND apie
ROG WMO ian A ag
SEARO SS TS Y y (ZR Paiva : ; |

q g

VU ZG

(F

ae Wh

Of

a

a

ie

:

PaoaoIWSSSVIE WR OAS ENS

} :

l

au

7),

x
\\
N

;

fo)
jo)
N
4

RAST ea

VINHOSIN 'SNIAW! «© ~~ NOL ett
YT 'viswgp vessopuy|
94t-W7

|  daGWNN ON

|

=

OQ.

Bs)
©. fo
Z. Sg
lu €.
> F
Zz a
n22o0
: ON
Lo _ 3
—mosc
Oab
Zoho
QO =s
N - are
w.2c
Wu eZ
QAgne
2885
{I n2ZV

~—.LMI76
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
February 27, 2009

|                                                                  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ M. ETHAN BERMAN M. Ethan Berman (Principal Executive Officer) |  | 

---



QuickLinks
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00102-CR

______________________________

EX PARTE: JIMMY RAY ADAMS

 

On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

 Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19,549-B

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jimmy Ray Adams attempts to appeal the denial of his post-conviction application for writ

of habeas corpus. The trial court denied Adams' application January 9, 2009. Thus, Adams' notice

of appeal was due to be filed on or before February 9, 2009. See TEX.R.APP. P. 26.2, 4.1. A motion

for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before February 23, 2009.

See TEX.R.APP. P. 26.3. No motion for extension of time was filed. Adams' pro se notice of appeal

was not filed until May 13, 2009.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). 

Adams has failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: June 8, 2009

Date Decided June 9, 2009

Do Not Publish
### §3501. Number of passengers

(a) Each certificate of inspection issued to a vessel carrying passengers (except a ferry) shall include a statement on the number of passengers that the vessel is permitted to carry.

(b) The owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, or individual in charge of a vessel is liable to a person suing them for carrying more passengers than the number of passengers permitted by the certificate of inspection in an amount equal to—

(1) passage money; and

(2) $100 for each passenger in excess of the number of passengers permitted.

(c) An owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, or individual in charge of a vessel that knowingly carries more passengers than the number of passengers permitted by the certificate of inspection also shall be fined not more than $100, imprisoned for not more than 30 days, or both.

(d) The vessel also is liable in rem for a penalty under this section.

(e) An offshore supply vessel may not carry passengers except in an emergency.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 519; Pub. L. 99–36, §1(a)(2), May 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 67.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 3501 | 46:404–146:45146:45246:462 |

46:451

46:452

46:462

Section 3501 requires that a vessel carrying passengers, including a passenger vessel as well as a small passenger vessel (except a ferry), shall have on the certificate of inspection a statement as to the number of passengers the vessel is permitted to carry. It also provides penalties for carrying passengers in excess of the number permitted.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–36, §1(a)(2)(A), struck out the comma after "(except a ferry)".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 99–36, §1(a)(2)(B), substituted "carries more passengers than the number of passengers permitted by the certificate of inspection" for "violates subsection (b) of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Chapter effective Apr. 15, 1984, see section 2(g)(1) of Pub. L. 98–89, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
Exhibit 4.1


 


SHARE CERTIFICATE


 





	Number of certificate	 	Number of shares
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 






 


GOLDEN HEAVEN GROUP
HOLDINGS LTD.


 


COMPANY NUMBER
[NUMBER]


 


This is to certify that [Name] of
[Address] is the registered holder of [Number] [Share Class] shares of [Value] each being [partly paid to the extent of [amount in words]
[amount in numerals] per share]]/[fully paid][and numbered [number]] in the above-named company, subject to the memorandum and articles
of association of the company.


 


[Transfer date]


 





	 	 	 
	Director	 	Director/Secretary
### §3105. Safeguards

The head of each Federal agency shall establish safeguards against the removal or loss of records the head of such agency determines to be necessary and required by regulations of the Archivist. Safeguards shall include making it known to officials and employees of the agency—

(1) that records in the custody of the agency are not to be alienated or destroyed except in accordance with sections 3301–3314 of this title, and

(2) the penalties provided by law for the unlawful removal or destruction of records.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1298; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(22), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2290; Pub. L. 113–187, §8(11), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2012.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §396(e) (June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title V, §506(e), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(d), 64 Stat. 583).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 3304 to 3307 of this title, included in the reference in par. (1) to sections 3301 to 3314 of this title, were repealed by Pub. L. 91–287, §2(c), June 23, 1970, 84 Stat. 321.

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–187 substituted "the head of such agency" for "he" in introductory provisions.

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist" for "Administrator of General Services".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3269 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3269

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the International Organizations Immunities Act to provide for 
      the applicability of that Act to the Bank for International 
                              Settlements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS UNDER 
              THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IMMUNITIES ACT.

    The International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288 et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
    ``Sec. 17.
    The provisions of this title may be extended to the Bank for 
International Settlements in the same manner, to the same extent, and 
subject to the same conditions, as they may be extended to a public 
international organization in which the United States participates 
pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress 
authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such 
participation.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Hugh Miller, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                at the dates and for the periods
                indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.







Date:  November
      8, 2006








/s/
      Hugh
      Miller Hugh
      Miller


*President
      and Chief Executive Officer*
"li" ' 

## SERVE D DECEMBE R 5 , 20 1
mDtC- 5 P2-

- 1 2

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I NTH EMATTERO F M & RHELICOPTERS , LL C FA ADOCKE T No . CPlOSOOOl I (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDMSNo
. FAA-2010-121 1 ORDE R DENYIN G MOTION S Complainan t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) ha s move d unde r1 4 CF R §13.218(f)(5 ) fo ra decision , assertin g tha t n o genuin e issue s o ffac t exis t an d tha t i t i s entitle d t o judgmen t a s a matte ro flaw
. Responden t M & R Helicopters , LL C ("Respondent" ) ha s file d a respons e opposin g Complainant' s motio n an d itsel fmovin g t o dismis s th e action
. Th e respectiv e motion s ar e eac h hereb yDENIED
. Th e hearin g wil l procee d a s schedule d b yth e Notic e o fHearin g Date s serve d Octobe r14 , 2011
. 

# :cljO.&Jl ^ M lichardC
. Goodwi n Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA ADocke t No . CPIOSOOO : (Civi l Penalt y Action ) REVISE D SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Michae l Selii^ , MD , FAGC , CFl-H , Respondent' s Representativ e 281 6 0refiel dRoa d Allentown , P A1810 4 TEL : 610-360-395 3 FAX : Charle s Ralev , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Enforcemen t

Division/AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f

Counse l Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 TEL : 202-267-335 7 FAX ; 202-267-510 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e LOM'.Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 • - . U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-A dviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX ; 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mjiil
. Fo

r ser\'ic e i nperso no r b y e.Npedilc dcourier, use tJi

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio nA dmin i s i ra t ion , 60 0 Independence Avenue , S.W.
. Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Wasliington, D C 20591 ; Altention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk
. AGC-430
.
NO. 05-13-01509-CR

BRYAN WILLIAM REED § IN THE COURT OF § VS. § CRIMINAL APPEALS § STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Bryan William Reed, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves for an extension of time of 45 days to file a petition

for discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following:

1. On January 29, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's

conviction. Bryan William Reed v. State, 380th Judicial District Court of Collin

County, Texas, under Cause # Cause No. 380-8024443-2013

The judgment

date was October 21, 2013.. This petition is therefore due on

02/13/2015.

2. Counsel has been unable to complete the petition for the following

reasons: Defendant has retained New Counsel. Substituted Counsel will require

additional time to prepare and file Petition for Discretionary Review..

3. Defendant

is currently free on bond.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , appellant respectfully PD-0166-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/11/2015 6:23:44 PM Accepted 2/12/2015 9:31:38 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKrequests an extension of 45 days, i.e. until March 30, 2015, to file a petition for

discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

Fasoro Law PLLC 8330 LBJ FWY Suite 290 Dallas, Texas 75243 (214) 705-3475 (214) 705-3472 (Fax Number)

By: /S/ Kunle Fasoro Kunle Fasoro State Bar No. 24086455 kfasoro@fasorolaw.com Attorney for Bryan William Reed

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on February 11, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Dallas

County, by electronic service through the Electronic Filing Manager.

/S/ Kunle Fasoro Kunle Fasoro
### §§602 to 609. Repealed. June 17, 1944, ch. 261, §2(a), 58 Stat. 279

Section 602, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §1, 41 Stat. 627, related to notice of lands subject to entry and conditions and reservations in patents.

Section 603, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §2, 41 Stat. 628, related to assessment of past expenditure for benefit of reclamation fund.

Section 604, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §3, 41 Stat. 628, related to survey and opening of lands to entry.

Section 605, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §4, 41 Stat. 628, related to additional payments; installments; forfeiture for nonpayment, etc.

Section 606, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §5, 41 Stat. 628, related to preference rights of World War I veterans.

Section 607, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §6, 41 Stat. 629, related to squatter's rights not recognized, time of entry, and penalty for premature entry.

Section 608, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §7, 41 Stat. 629, related to Lands in Klamath Lake Bird Reservation.

Section 609, act May 27, 1920, ch. 209, §8, 41 Stat. 629, related to powers of Secretary of the Interior in relation to project.
### §729. United States Statutes at Large: references in margins

The Archivist of the United States shall include in the references in margins of the United States Statutes at Large the number of the bill or joint resolution (designating S. for Senate bill, H.R. for House bill, S.J. Res. for Senate joint resolution and H.J. Res. for House joint resolution, as the case may be) under which each Act was approved and became a law, the reference in the margins to be placed within brackets immediately under the date of the approval of the Act at the beginning of each Act as printed beginning with Volume 32 of the United States Statutes at Large.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1252; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(1), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2286.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §197 (Apr. 12, 1904, No. 20, 33 Stat. 589; 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 20, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3178, 64 Stat. 1272).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist of the United States" for "Administrator of General Services".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
##### 






EXHIBIT 32.2


Polypore, Inc.


Chief Financial Officer Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


10-K




|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



| |     |              
| | --- | -------------
| | By: | /s/ Lynn Amos

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Lynn Amos              
| | Chief Financial Officer