alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco. CA 94105-3901



### DEC 1 8 2009 Mr. John R. Lewis Executive Director Inter Tribal Council ofArizona, Inc. 2214 North Central Avenue, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Re: Extension Consultation onAdvanced Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (ANPR) concerning Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) determination for Navajo Generating Station, EPA DocketNo. EPA-R09-0AR-2009-0598 (74 Fed. Reg. 44313; August 28,2009) Dear Mr. Lewis: Thank you very much for inviting me and my staffto your meeting on December 15,2009to discuss ourANPR on the BART determination for Navajo Generating Station. I appreciate the opportunityto discuss the ANPR and the process ofourfuture rulemaking on this issue and to heardirectly the concerns of all the tribes that are !TCA members. As part ofthis meeting we agreed to extend the commentperiod for all tribes potentially affected by ourfuture BARTdetermination from December 28, 2009, until March 1,2010,to provide more time for government-to-government consultation. Please note that only tribes will be eligibleto submit comments during this informal extension. We appreciate your interest in our action and look forward to consulting with you throughout our rulemaking process. Please contactme at 520-498-0118 ifyou have additional questions. Sincerely,

Colleen McKaughan Associate Director, Air Division

Primed on Recycled Paper
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–71

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1273, THE

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION AUTHORIZATION ACT

OF 1997

APRIL 23, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 126]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 126, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1273, the

‘‘National Science Foundation Authorization Act of 1997’’ under an

open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided

equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Science.

The rule makes in order the Committee on Science amendment

in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for purpose of

amendment, with each title being considered as read.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record

prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to

offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules.

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 162 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 162 Filed 07/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 162 Filed 07/28/15 Page 3 of 3
### §990. Grant to Missouri

All lands in the State of Missouri selected as swamp and overflowed lands, and regularly reported as such to the General Land Office, and on March 3, 1877, withheld from market as such, so far as the same remain vacant and unappropriated and not interfered with by any preemption, homestead, or other claim under any law of the United States, and the claim whereto has not been on said date rejected by the Commissioner of the General Land Office, or other competent authority, are confirmed to said State, and all title thereto vested in said State: and it is made the duty of the Secretary of the Interior to cause patents to issue for the same.

(Mar. 3, 1877, ch. 116, 19 Stat. 395.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

General Land Office and office of its Commissioner abolished by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, which transferred functions of former to Bureau of Land Management, and transferred functions of latter to Secretary of the Interior or that officer as he may designate. See section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 653 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On April 25, 2010, the court ordered the ACLU of Northern

California and Equality California (together the “No on 8 groups”)

to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failing

to produce documents responsive to the court’s March 5, Doc #610,

and March 22, Doc #623, orders. Doc #641. On April 27, 2010, the

No on 8 groups represented that they had produced all responsive

non-privileged documents. Doc #649. On April 30, 2010, plaintiffs

and proponents informed the court that they believe the No on 8

groups’ production complies with the March 5 and March 22 orders. 

Doc #651 (plaintiffs); Doc #652 (proponents).

Accordingly, good cause having been shown, the order to

show cause why the No on 8 groups should not be held in contempt

for failing to produce documents as ordered, Doc #641, is hereby

DISCHARGED. The hearing scheduled for May 3, 2010 is VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 653 Filed 04/30/10 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: D&R USA Enterprise, Inc.'s v. SCF RC Funding IV, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-22-00891-CV

Trial court case number: 2021-51843A

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from the trial court’s August 22, 2022 order granting a severance and 

transferring several documents, including the July 20, 2022 order of partial summary judgment, 

into trial court cause 2021-51843A. 

On December 6, 2022, appellant D & R USA Enterprise, Inc. (D & R) filed a motion for 

emergency relief, asking this Court to (1) order the trial court to vacate an oral November 30, 2022 

order releasing two bonds to SCF RC Funding IV, LLC (SCF); and (2) “stay all other trial court 

proceedings pending disposition [of] this appeal.” 

As to the alleged oral order of November 30, 2022, D & R has not provided documentation 

of the order to show that it was entered in the trial court cause on appeal in this case, which is trial 

court cause 2021-51843A. 

Although D & R cites to general authority that permits an appellate court to grant stays in 

accelerated appeals and original proceedings, D & R offers no authority permitting this Court to 

stay proceedings in a different trial court cause than the one involved in the appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for emergency relief is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Richard Hightower

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __December 13, 2022_____
#### § 81.42 Prohibitions against discrimination.

Neither GSE shall discriminate in any manner in making any mortgage purchases because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, age, or national origin, including any consideration of the age or location of the dwelling or the age of the neighborhood or census tract where the dwelling is located in a manner that has a discriminatory effect.
§ 401.99 How does an owner request a section 8 contract renewal? ( a ) *Requesting Restructuring Plan.* An owner may request a section 8 contract renewal as part of a Restructuring Plan by, at least 3 months before the expiration date of any project-based assistance, certifying to HUD that to the best of the owner's knowledge: ( 1 ) Project rents are above comparable market rents; and
( 2 ) The owner is not suspended or debarred or has been notified by HUD of any pending suspension or debarment or other enforcement action, or, if so, a voluntary sale or transfer of the property is proposed in accordance with § 401.480.
( b ) *Eligible but not requesting Restructuring Plan.* If an owner is eligible for a Restructuring Plan but requests a renewal of project-based assistance without a Plan, in accordance with the applicable requirements in § 402.6 of this chapter, HUD will consider the request in accordance with § 402.4(a)(2) of this chapter.
( c ) *Not eligible for Restructuring Plan.* Section 402.5 of this chapter addresses renewal of project-based assistance for a Restructuring Plan. An owner of such a project may also request renewal under § 402.4 of this chapter.
[65 FR 15485, Mar. 22, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 53900, Sept. 6, 2000]
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc., (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard V. Secord, Acting Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: /s/ Richard V. Secord
---------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Acting Financial Officer

May 24, 2004
### §8456. Socioeconomic impacts of increased coal production and other energy development

#### (a) Committee

There is hereby established an interagency committee composed of the heads of the Departments of Energy, Commerce, Interior, Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Health and Human Services, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Appalachian Regional Commission, the Farmers' Home Administration, the Office of Management and Budget, and such other Federal agencies as the Secretary shall designate. In carrying out its functions the committee shall consult with the National Governors' Conference and interested persons, organizations, and entities. The chairman of the committee shall be designated by the President. The committee shall terminate 90 days after the submission of its report under subsection (c).

#### (b) Functions of committee

It is the function of the committee to conduct a study of the socioeconomic impacts of expanded coal production and rapid energy development in general, on States, including local communities, and on the public, including the adequacy of housing and public, recreational, and cultural facilities for coal miners and their families and the effect of any Federal or State laws or regulations on providing such housing and facilities. The committee shall gather data and information on—

(1) the level of assistance provided under this chapter and any other programs related to impact assistance,

(2) the timeliness of assistance in meeting impacts caused by Federal decisions on energy policy as well as private sector decisions, and

(3) the obstacles to effective assistance contained in regulations of existing programs related to impact assistance.

#### (c) Report

Within 1 year after the effective date of this chapter, the committee shall submit a detailed report on the results of such study to the Congress, together with any recommendations for additional legislation it may consider appropriate.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title VII, §746, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3344; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

The effective date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (c), is the effective date of Pub. L. 95–620. See section 901 of Pub. L. 95–620, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8301 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3115 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clocks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Mr. KIRK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain clocks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CLOCKS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.57 Clocks, whether or not put 

up in sets, put up for mail 

order retail sale, and each 

weighing not over 2.5 kg together with their retail packaging (provided for in subheading 9105.21.80) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3115 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 324

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostStacey Mastrapa Post Office Building’’. Altamonte Springs, Florida, as the ‘‘Arthur al Service located at 321 Montgomery Road in

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 324

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs,

Florida, as the ‘‘Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post Office

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 324 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs,

4 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Arthur

5 Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

10 to the ‘‘Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 15,

2005.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 75.23 Section 3 safe harbor. ( a ) *General.* Recipients will be considered to have complied with requirements in this part, in the absence of evidence to the contrary if they: ( 1 ) Certify that they have followed the prioritization of effort in § 75.19; and
( 2 ) Meet or exceed the applicable Section 3 benchmark as described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Establishing benchmarks.* ( 1 ) HUD will establish Section 3 benchmarks for Section 3 workers or Targeted Section 3 workers or both through a document published in the Federal Register. HUD may establish a single nationwide benchmark for Section 3 workers and a single nationwide benchmark for Targeted Section 3 workers, or may establish multiple benchmarks based on geography, the nature of the Section 3 project, or other variables. HUD will update the benchmarks through a document published in the Federal Register, subject to public comment, not less frequently than once every 3 years. Such notice shall include aggregate data on labor hours and the proportion of recipients meeting benchmarks, as well as other metrics reported pursuant to § 75.25 as deemed appropriate by HUD, for the 3 most recent reporting years.
( 2 ) In establishing the Section 3 benchmarks, HUD may consider the industry averages for labor hours worked by specific categories of workers or in different localities or regions; averages for labor hours worked by Section 3 workers and Targeted Section 3 workers as reported by recipients pursuant to this section; and any other factors HUD deems important. In establishing the Section 3 benchmarks, HUD will exclude professional services from the total number of labor hours as such hours are excluded from the total number of labor hours to be reported per § 75.25(a)(4).
( 3 ) Section 3 benchmarks will consist of the following two ratios: ( i ) The number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers divided by the total number of labor hours worked by all workers on a Section 3 project in the recipient's program year.
( ii ) The number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers as defined in § 75.21(a), divided by the total number of labor hours worked by all workers on a Section 3 project in the recipient's program year.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


                                      CERTIFICATION

I, Richard V. Secord, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc. ("CTI");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2005

/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Acting Chief Financial Officer


                                 Page 20 of 23
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3169 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 

Received 

AN ACT 

To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority 

for students who are eligible for Pell Grants who are 

adversely affected by a natural disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 3169 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pell Grant Hurricane 

3 and Disaster Relief Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WAIVERS OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT REPAYMENT 

5 BY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY DISASTERS. 

6 Section 484B(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 

7 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091b(b)(2)) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) WAIVERS OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT

10 REPAYMENT BY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY DIS11 ASTERS.—The Secretary may waive the 

12 amounts that students are required to return 

13 under this section with respect to Federal Pell 

14 Grants if the withdrawals on which the returns 

15 are based are withdrawals by students— 

16 ‘‘(i) who were residing in, employed 

17 in, or attending an institution of higher 

18 education that is located in an area in 

19 which the President has declared that a 

20 major disaster exists, in accordance with 

21 section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Dis22 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

23 (42 U.S.C. 5170); 

24 ‘‘(ii) whose attendance was inter25 rupted because of the impact of the dis26 aster on the student or the institution; and 
3 

HR 3169 RDS 

1 ‘‘(iii) whose withdrawal ended within 

2 the academic year during which the des3 ignation occurred or during the next suc4 ceeding academic year.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 7, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.