alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,992
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                     13,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,524
<PP&E>                                           6,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,365
<OTHER-SE>                                    (137,948)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,139
<SALES>                                         56,126
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,126
<CGS>                                           26,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
### §231l. Penalties

(a) Any person who shall knowingly fail or refuse to make any report or furnish any information required by the Board in the administration of this subchapter, including the provisions of section 231f(b)(2) of this title or who shall knowingly make or cause to be made any false or fraudulent statement or report when a statement or report is required to be made for the purpose of this subchapter, or who shall knowingly make or aid in making any false or fraudulent statement or claim for the purpose of causing an award or payment to be made, shall be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 or by imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both.

(b) All fines and penalties imposed by a court pursuant to this subchapter shall be paid to the court and be remitted from time to time by order of the judge to the Treasury of the United States to be credited to the Railroad Retirement Account.

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, §13, as restated June 24, 1937, ch. 382, pt. I, 50 Stat. 307, as restated Pub. L. 93–445, title I, §101, Oct. 16, 1974, 88 Stat. 1345.)
#### In the Matter of Altagracia Polanco, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 471]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George D. Salerno, J.), entered June 3, 2005, which denied the petition to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner concedes that she failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for her delay and that her accident was not reported until she made her motion, some 14 months after her claim *321arose. Her argument that respondent’s records of maintenance and snow and ice removal can provide actual notice of the essential facts underlying her claim is improperly raised for the first time on appeal *(see e.g. Miles v City of New York,*173 AD2d 298, 300 [1991]). Were we to consider it, we would reject it inasmuch as the maintenance and snow and ice removal records would not have given respondent notice that petitioner had allegedly tripped, fallen and broken her leg.

Even if the claim arose out of a transitory condition, that does not preclude a finding that respondent was prejudiced by petitioner’s delay in asserting the claim *(see Harris v City of New York,*297 AD2d 473, 474 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 503 [2002]). In *Zarrello v City of New York*(61 NY2d 628 [1983]), where the plaintiff had delayed for one year and 87 days, the Court of Appeals upheld a finding of prejudice for a claim “predicated on the defective state of the sidewalk and the accumulation of ice and snow” *(id.*at 630).

The mere existence of records does not “eliminate the inference that prejudice would accompany the passage of time” *(Matter of Vargas v New York City Hous. Auth.,*232 AD2d 263 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 817 [1997]). In any event, lack of prejudice, alone, is not determinative *(see Bullard v City of New York,*118 AD2d 447, 452 [1986, Kassal, J., concurring]; *see also Matter of Morris v County of Suffolk,*88 AD2d 956, 957 [1982], *affd*58 NY2d 767 [1982]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.
§ 886.111a Notice upon contract expiration. ( a ) The Contract will provide that the owner will notify each assisted family, at least 90 days before the end of the Contract term, of any increase in the amount the family will be required to pay as rent which may occur as a result of its expiration. If the Contract is to be renewed but with a reduction in the number of units covered by it, this notice shall be given to each family who will not longer be assisted under the Contract.
( b ) The notice provided for in paragraph (a) of this section shall be accomplished by: ( 1 ) Sending a letter by first class mail, properly stamped and addressed, to the family at its address at the project, with a proper return address, and
( 2 ) serving a copy of the notice on any adult person answering the door at the leased dwelling unit, or if no adult responds, by placing the notice under or through the door, if possible, or else by affixing the notice to the door. Service shall not be considered to be effective until both required notices have been accomplished. The date on which the notice shall be considered to be received by the family shall be the date on which the owner mails the first class letter provided for in this paragraph, or the date on which the notice provided for in this paragraph is properly given, whichever is later.
( c ) The notice shall advise each affected family that, after the expiration date of the Contract, the family will be required to bear the entire cost of the rent and that the owner will be free (to the extent the project is not otherwise regulated by HUD) to alter the rent without HUD approval, but subject to any applicable requirements or restrictions under the lease or under State or local law. The notice shall also state: ( 1 ) The actual (if known) or the estimated rent which will be charged following the expiration of the Contract;
( 2 ) the difference between the rent and the Total Tenant Payment toward rent under the Contract; and
( 3 ) the date the Contract will expire.
( d ) The owner shall give HUD a certification that families have been notified in accordance with this section with an example of the text of the notice attached.
( e ) This section applies to all Contracts executed, renewed or amended on or after October 1, 1984.
[49 FR 31285, Aug. 6, 1984]
### §42a. Use of receipts from sale of maps for map printing and distribution

In fiscal year 1984 and thereafter, all receipts from the sale of maps sold or stored by the United States Geological Survey shall be available for map printing and distribution to supplement funds otherwise available, to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 98–146, title I, Nov. 4, 1983, 97 Stat. 926; Pub. L. 102–154, title I, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1000.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Geological Survey" substituted in text for "Geological Survey" pursuant to provision of title I of Pub. L. 102–154, set out as a note under section 31 of this title.
®G?IorB'fO!IfRsI,.,---{)<:f---j)l().""""'--.l.._.l.._..L..._---[>kJ----'------'----!f-----..:.:...:.:==------1@,..T/r".-'1NAl\.!l&"''or---lt------i•"""NAMALGASrArr.o...1:11"5G2Jl151USQ>M41Jlf'SitWi,!IOOBTU,AISCII11/2."...<("'IASBUILTIL..,ELECTRICALMotorsControlsl460V/3Ph/60Hz115V/1Ph/60HzLINEANDPIPINGSYMBOLIDENTI[!CAT!ONI.----DENDITSFLEXIBLE2.·--·-·-----·DENOlESEl.ECmCALSIGNALJ.----DENOlESINSlRULlENTUNEOENOT£St.IECHANICALLINKAGE:OENOT£SINSTRWAENTARUN£6.----OCNOTESLINEREFERENCE:DOCUMENTS:-VolveTrain5)'5temID-Electricalanclosurastobe4,indoornstclkltioo.-Altitude1400FASL-J2to1D4T-Customertopipeventstoascfelocation-CONTRQS115V/IPH/60HZ46DV/JPH/60HZMAX.HeatRelease0!"::sign.HeatRele:o:a:seLocation300x106BTU/hr300X10'BTU/hrIndoorsAltitudePilotTypePilotFuelBill#2FUELOIL1400FASLAECOMETRICPre-MixNaturalGasLOIII!:RHEATINGVALUE145,900BTU/USGMAXIMUMFLOWRATE2056USGPHNATURALGASLOWE:RHEATVALUE930BTU/SCFMAXIMUMFLOWRATE5376SCFM-'SBUII.T,1,00Df201,DELErECHKVAL'IES,ADOf>tX:SWITCHESISSUEDFORCUSlOMERAPPRO\IALAECOMETRICCORPORATIONTHECONAMARAGROUPONTARIO,CANADAKILNBURNERP&IDUNITEDTACONITE0B'l',Sc.t.LEDRAWINGN<>.'PROWlB-tlDATI:NTSCONTRACTNo.:""''CVST.COBB2-A-D-PD-DIsrt:ETNe>..:1REYISl<lNIOF1
August 1,2013

Notice of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. Intenttoterminate United Express Service atCody, WY Pursuant to Title 49 U.S. Code, Section 41734 

### ""f'I' l.!:' J 

### P I: liS

Pursuant to Title 49 ofthe U.S. Code, Section 41734, SkyWest Airlines, Inc. hereby serves notice ofintentto discontinue the United Express service from Cody, Wyoming to Denver, Colorado effective November 1,2013. Sincerely,

Michael Thompson Vice President
- Market Development SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790
#### GARY MARTINO *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 25205)

Dranginis, Bishop and DiPentima, Js.

Submitted on briefs April 1

officially released May 3, 2005

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         789,364
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         199,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,983,540
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,755,175
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     25,026,258
<ALLOWANCE>                                    311,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,433,573
<DEPOSITS>                                  36,109,730
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            376,310
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,939,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              44,433,573
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,538,325
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              498,569
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               124,492
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,161,386
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,051,989
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,051,989
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,109,397
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  120,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              15,950
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                859,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                285,043
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     222,448
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,448
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.11
<LOANS-NON>                                     22,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               215,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   25,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              312,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           312,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.3**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Frank
      P. Palantoni, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of Prestige Brands International, LLC on Form 10-K for the year
      ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      applicable, and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents
      in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      Prestige Brands International, LLC.




**/s/****FRANK
                  P. PALANTONI**Name:Frank
                  P. PalantoniTitle:*President*Date:June
                  14, 2006
### **CHAPTER 705—MARITIME DRUG LAW ENFORCEMENT**

Sec.
70501.
Findings and declarations.
70502.
Definitions.
70503.
Prohibited acts.
70504.
Jurisdiction and venue.
70505.
Failure to comply with international law as a defense.
70506.
Penalties.
70507.
Forfeitures.
70508.
Operation of submersible vessel or semi-submersible vessel without nationality.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §§306(a)(12), 314(e)(2), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 55, 59, inserted period at end of item 70508, added item 70503, and struck out former item 70503 "Manufacture, distribution, or possession of controlled substances on vessels".

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–407, title II, §202(b)(1), Oct. 13, 2008, 122 Stat. 4300, added item 70508.
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A185
#### HALL v. GILMAN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 23, 1903.)

Action by Helen P. Hall against Theophilus Gilman and others.

No opinion. Motion denied.
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATE OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND**

**ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF**

**QUANTUM ENERGY INC.**

I, Richard Porterfield, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Quantum Energy Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 29, 2008 (the “Report”):

|   | a. | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at February 29, 2008, and the results of the Company’s operations for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                 |   |   |   |                                                             |
|----------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  June 30, 2008 |   |   |   | /s/ Richard Porterfield                                          |
|                 |   |   |   |                                                             |
|                 |   |   |   | Richard Porterfield                                              |
|                 |   |   |   | *Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer* |
Exhibit 99.1


Annual Statement as to Compliance


The following hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, that
(i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
under the agreements attached hereto in Exhibit A have been made under
the supervision of an officer of IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., and (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on the review, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., acting as Master
Servicer, has fulfilled all its obligations under these agreements
throughout the year, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment
of any obligation, specifying each default known to the officer and the
nature and status thereof.  The Trustee shall forward a copy of each
compliance statement to each Rating Agency.


By:  /s/:  Robert Abramian
Robert Abramian
VP

By:  /s/:  Barbara Perez
Barbara Perez
SVP



<page>


Exhibit A

IndyMac SPMD 2000-C
IndyMac SPMD 2001-A
IndyMac SPMD 2001-B
IndyMac SPMD 2001-C
IndyMac RAST 2002-A5
IndyMac RAST 2002-A7
IndyMac RAST 2002-L8
IndyMac RAST 2002-A11
IndyMac RAST 2002-A12
IndyMac RAST 2002-A13
IndyMac RAST 2002-A14
IndyMac RAST 2002-A15
IndyMac RAST 2002-A16
IndyMac SPMD 2002-A
IndyMac SPMD 2002-B
IndyMac RAST 2003-A1
IndyMac RAST 2003-A2
IndyMac RAST 2003-A3
IndyMac RAST 2003-A4
IndyMac RAST 2003-A5
IndyMac RAST 2003-A6
IndyMac RAST 2003-A7
IndyMac RAST 2003-A8
IndyMac RAST 2003-A9
IndyMac SPMD 2003-A
IndyMac RAST 2003-A10
IndyMac RAST 2003-A11
IndyMac RAST 2003-A12
IndyMac RAST 2003-A13
IndyMac RAST 2003-A14
IndyMac RAST 2003-A15
IndyMac Loan Trust 2003-L1
IndyMac RAST 2004-A1
IndyMac RAST 2004-A2
IndyMac RAST 2004-A3
IndyMac RAST 2004-A4
IndyMac RAST 2004-A5
IndyMac RAST 2004-A6
IndyMac RAST 2004-A7
IndyMac RAST 2004-A8
IndyMac RAST 2004-A9
IndyMac RAST 2004-A10
IndyMac Loan Trust 2004-L1
IndyMac Residential Asset Backed Trust 2004-LH1
IndyMac Rast 2004-INDYPORT1
IndyMac Rast 2004-INDYPORT2
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR1
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR2
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR3
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR4
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR5
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR6
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR7
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR8
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR9
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR10
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR11
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR12
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR13
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR14
IndyMac INDX 2004-AR15
INDYMAC SPMD 2004-A
INDYMAC SPMD 2004-B
INDYMAC SPMD 2004-C
#### John Keefe, Appellant, *v.*Samuel S. Warner et al., Respondents.

(Argued October 19, 1881 ;

decided November 29, 1881.)

*Matthew Hole*for appellant.

*Amasa J. Pa/rker*for respondent.

Agree to affirm.

Andrews, Ch. J., and Earl, J., dissenting.

No opinion.

Judgment affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD F. MARTINEZ, 

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

MIKE EVANS, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-5293 CRB (PR)

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to amend and file a second amended

complaint. The court requests that defendants file a response to the motion by no

later than August 20, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: Aug. 5, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.08\Martinez, R1.or7.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-05293-CRB Document 76 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Wireless Facilities, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yiru
      Shi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  That
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      September 28, 2008





SHENGTAI
              PHARMACEUTICAL, INC./s/
                Yiru Shi*Chief
                Financial Officer*
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edward Levy, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Rand Logistics, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: July 31, 2017





/s/ Edward LevyEdward LevyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23

- 0450 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN RAYMOND WELZEL, Defendant and Appellant

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 22 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 14 2024

03/14/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0450
### §951. Right of way for water transportation, domestic purposes, or development of power

Rights of way for ditches, canals, or reservoirs heretofore or hereafter approved under the provisions of sections 946 to 949 of this title may be used for purposes of a public nature; and said rights of way may be used for purposes of water transportation, for domestic purposes, or for the development of power, as subsidiary to the main purpose of irrigation or drainage.

(May 11, 1898, ch. 292, §2, 30 Stat. 404; Mar. 4, 1917, ch. 184, §2, 39 Stat. 1197.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.