alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****GasTIPS [electronic resource]
 
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.160:
Item Number:0429-A-71 (online)
CGP System Number:000611946
 
Winter 2007 (vol. 13 - No. 1)
Fall 2006 (vol. 12 - No. 4)
Summer 2006 (vol. 12 - No. 3)
Spring 2006 (vol. 12 - No. 2)
Winter 2006 (vol. 12 - No. 1)
Fall 2005 (vol. 11 - No. 4)
Summer 2005 (vol. 11 - No. 3)
Spring 2005 (vol. 11 - No. 2)
Winter 2005 (vol. 11 - No. 1)
Fall 2004 (vol. 10 - No. 4)
Summer 2004 (Vol. 10 - No. 3)
Spring 2004 (Vol. 10 - No. 2)
Winter 2004 (Vol. 10 - No. 1)
Fall 2003 (Vol. 9 - No. 4)
Summer 2003 (Vol. 9 - No. 3)
Spring 2003 (Vol. 9 - No. 2)
Winter 2003 (Vol. 9 - No. 1)
Fall 2002 (Vol. 8 - No. 4)
Summer 2002 (Vol. 8 - No. 3)
Spring 2002 (Vol. 8 - No. 2)
Winter 2002 (Vol. 8 - No. 1)
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 11, 2017********
§ 574.530 Recordkeeping. Each grantee must ensure that records are maintained for a 4-year period to document compliance with the provisions of this part. Grantees must maintain the following: ( a ) Current and accurate data on the race and ethnicity of program participants.
( b ) Documentation of the actions the grantee has taken to affirmatively further fair housing, pursuant to §§ 5.151 and 5.152 of this title.
( c ) Data on emergency transfers requested under 24 CFR 5.2005(e), pertaining to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, including data on the outcomes of such requests.
[80 FR 42368, July 16, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 80806, Nov. 16, 2016; 85 FR 47911, Aug. 7, 2020; 86 FR 30792, June 10, 2021]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC GUNDERSEN,

Plaintiff,

 v.

LENNAR ASSOCIATES

MANAGEMENTS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 09-2270 CRB

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

FOR CONTINUANCE AND REQUEST

FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVERLONG

BRIEFS

This Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Continuance of

Defendants’ Motion to Deny Class Certification and Expanded Briefing. Good cause

appearing, the hearing for Defendants’ motion to deny class certification is continued to

November 12, 2010. The briefing schedule is altered accordingly.

Plaintiff also requests permission to file briefs no longer than 25 pages both in support

of his Motion for Class Certification and in opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Deny Class

Certification. This request is GRANTED. Defendants are likewise granted permission to

file briefs not to exceed 25 pages both in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class

Certification and in reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Deny Class 

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-02270-CRB Document 138 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\2270\Order Continuing Hearing.wpd 2

Certification.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 21, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02270-CRB Document 138 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2
#### SUTHERLAND, Respondent, v. LASHER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 20, 1903.)

Action by George R. Sutherland against Lewis P. Lasher.

R. C. Freeman, for appellant.

E. Hassett, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 84 N. Y. Supp. 56.
### §546. Jurisdiction of district court for enforcement of this subchapter

Jurisdiction of suits by the United States for the enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter is conferred on the United States district courts of the districts in which the lands are situated.

(Aug. 9, 1912, ch. 278, §5, 37 Stat. 267.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1777

EDWARD JUNIOR CLARK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; CARLYLE BRITT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-00-372-3-MU)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Edward Junior Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bland, WEAVER,

BENNETT & BLAND, P.A., Matthews, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Junior Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Clark v. Queen City Recovery, No. CA-00-

372-3-MU (W.D.N.C. May 9 & 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §2503. Patents surrendered and new ones issued

Where patents have been already issued on entries which are approved by the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate, upon the canceling of the outstanding patent, is authorized to issue a new patent, on such approval, to the person who made the entry, his heirs or assigns.

(R.S. §2456; Sept. 20, 1922, ch. 350, 42 Stat. 858; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1163 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §2456 derived from act Mar. 3, 1853, ch. 152, §2, 10 Stat. 258.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate," substituted for "Commissioner of the General Land Office" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
### PRISM3 DOT1 Atlantic Basin Reconstruction

By: Harry DowsettMarci RobinsonGary S. DwyerMark ChandlerThomas Cronin

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds189

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Database:  **Database**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Creative Solutions With Art, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Carla L Santia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify that:

1)                The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: April 1, 2005

                                            By: /s/ Carla L. Santia
                                            Name:   Carla L. Santia
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\2204\Judgment.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD EDWARD WRIGHT JR,

Plaintiff,

    v.

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCOFIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, et al,

Defendants.                                                                      /

No. C 09-2204 CRB

JUDGMENT

The Court, having granted Defendant ATF’s Motion for Summary Judgment, enters

judgment in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02204-CRB   Document 21   Filed 02/18/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-11T23:52:53-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 11**  **6 7** 

In R e: MITCHELL GATEWOOD ,
P etitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 3 :0 8

- cv - 00 1 8 2

- RJC )

Submitted : September 29, 2010 Decided: November 16, 2010

Be fore NIEMEYER , GREGORY, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition deni ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mitchell Gatewood , Petitioner Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mitchell Gatewood petitions f or a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that , on September 13,
2010, the district court entered an order denying relief on
Gatewood’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gatewood ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in for ma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-40558 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TROY ALARDIN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:09-CR-2703-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appo i n t e d to represent Troy Alardin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alardin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevan t p ortions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
c o u n s e l’ s a s s e s s m e nt that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 16, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40558 Document: 00511573474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2011No. 10-40558

counsel is excused from further responsibilities he r e i n, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-40558 Document: 00511573474 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2011
#### § 573.4 Loan term.

The term of the loan to be guaranteed by HUD under this part may not exceed 20 years.
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–88

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 478, THE

FLOOD PREVENTION AND FAMILY PROTECTION ACT OF

1997

MAY 6, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 142]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 142, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 478, the

‘‘Flood Prevention and Family Protection Act of 1997’’ under an

open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate divided

equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Resources.

The rule makes in order the Committee on Resources amendment in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for purpose

of amendment. The rule also considers the Committee on Resources

amendment in the nature of a substitute as read.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record

prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to

offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules.

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
### §1714. Publications for use of National Archives and Records Administration

The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall print and deliver to the National Archives and Records Administration for use by the Archivist of the United States, including use by the Presidential Library established for the President during whose term the documents were issued, which shall be chargeable to Congress three copies each of the following publications:

House documents and public reports, bound;

Senate documents and public reports, bound;

Senate and House journals, bound;

United States Code and Supplements, bound;

United States Statutes at Large, bound;

the United States Reports, bound;

all other documents bearing a congressional number, or printed upon order of a committee in either House of Congress, or of a department, independent agency or establishment, commission, or officer of the Government, except confidential matter, blank forms, and circular letters not of a public character; and

public bills and resolutions in Congress in each parliamentary stage.

The Superintendent of Documents shall furnish, without cost, copies of publications available for free distribution.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1281; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(6), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2287; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §215a (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §—, as added June 17, 1935, ch. 267, 49 Stat. 386, and amended June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §104(a), 63 Stat. 381; Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–678, 80 Stat. 956.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in introductory provisions.

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "National Archives and Records Administration" for "General Services Administration" in section catchline and text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 575—CONSTRUCTION, CHARTER, AND SALE OF VESSELS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
57501.
Completion of long-range program.
57502.
Construction, reconditioning, and remodeling of vessels.
57503.
Competitive bidding.
57504.
Charter or sale of vessels acquired by Department of Transportation.
57505.
Employment of vessels on foreign trade routes.
57506.
Minimum selling price of vessels.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CHARTERS

57511.
Demise charters.
57512.
Competitive bidding.
57513.
Minimum bid.
57514.
Qualifications of bidders.
57515.
Awarding of charters.
57516.
Operating-differential subsidies.
57517.
Recovery of excess profits.
57518.
Performance bond.
57519.
Insurance.
57520.
Vessel maintenance.
57521.
Termination of charter during national emergency.
57522.
Books and records, balance sheets, and inspection and auditing.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—MISCELLANEOUS

57531.
Construction and charter of vessels for unsuccessful routes.
57532.
Operation of experimental vessels.
57533.
Vessel chartering authority.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2018**—Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, §3546(t), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2327, inserted period at end of item 57533.

**2016**—Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §313(c)(2), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 59, added item 57522.

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3511(b), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 594, added item 57533.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

§ 40.51 Labor certification. ( a ) *INA 212(a)(5) applicable only to certain immigrant aliens.* INA 212(a)(5)(A) applies only to immigrant aliens described in INA 203(b)(2) or (3) who are seeking to enter the United States for the purpose of engaging in gainful employment.
( b ) *Determination of need for alien's labor skills.* An alien within one of the classes to which INA 212(a)(5) applies as described in § 40.51(a) who seeks to enter the United States for the purpose of engaging in gainful employment, shall be ineligible under INA 212(a)(5)(A) to receive a visa unless the Secretary of Labor has certified to the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of State, that ( 1 ) There are not sufficient workers in the United States who are able, willing, qualified, (or equally qualified in the case of aliens who are members of the teaching profession or who have exceptional ability in the sciences or the arts) and available at the time of application for a visa and at the place to which the alien is destined to perform such skilled or unskilled labor, and
( 2 ) The employment of such alien will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of the workers in the United States similarly employed.
( c ) *Labor certification not required in certain cases.* A spouse or child accompanying or following to join an alien spouse or parent who is a beneficiary of a petition approved pursuant to INA 203(b)(2) or (3) is not considered to be within the purview of INA 212(a)(5).
[56 FR 30422, July 2, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 1835, Jan. 24, 1996]
### §30307. Commercial aviation accidents

(a) Definition.—In this section, the term "nonpecuniary damages" means damages for loss of care, comfort, and companionship.

(b) Beyond 12 Nautical Miles.—In an action under this chapter, if the death resulted from a commercial aviation accident occurring on the high seas beyond 12 nautical miles from the shore of the United States, additional compensation is recoverable for nonpecuniary damages, but punitive damages are not recoverable.

(c) Within 12 Nautical Miles.—This chapter does not apply if the death resulted from a commercial aviation accident occurring on the high seas 12 nautical miles or less from the shore of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1512.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30307(a) | 46 App.:762(b)(2). | Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, §§1(b), 2(b); as added Pub. L. 106–181, title IV, §404(a)(2), (b)(2), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 131. |
| 30307(b) | 46 App.:762(b)(1). | |
| 30307(c) | 46 App.:761(b). | |

Section

In subsections (b) and (c), the words "the United States" are substituted for "any State, or the District of Columbia, or the Territories or dependencies of the United States" because of the definition of "United States" in chapter 1 of the revised title.

In subsection (b), the words "of a decedent" are omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (c), the words "if the death resulted from a commercial aviation accident occurring on the high seas" are substituted for "In the case of a commercial aviation accident, whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default occurring on the high seas" for consistency with subsection (b) and to eliminate unnecessary words. The words "and the rules applicable under Federal, State, and other appropriate law shall apply" are omitted as unnecessary.
#### Dennis Larson LOOP, Appellant, v. HENNEPIN COUNTY; Hennepin County Sheriffs Department; City of Minneapolis; Jeff Burchett; Dan An-tisdel; Rick Palaia; Craig Martin; Todd Turpitt; Ken Vinuk, Appellees.

No. 06-1340.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 22, 2007.

Filed: May 30, 2007.

Dennis Larson Loop, Minneapolis, MN, pro se.

Toni Ann Bunker Beitz, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellees.

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Larson Loop appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following careful de novo review, *see Levy v. Ohl, 477*F.3d 988, 991 (8th Cir.2007), we affirm the dismissal for the reasons stated by the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.