alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| 3.1    | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation effective July 1, 1993. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 1993, which was dated and filed on January 27, 1994. Commission File No. 001-9618, and amended as of May 4, 1998. |
|   |   |
| 3.2    | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effective February 17, 2011. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on February 17, 2011. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.3    | Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effective February 21, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on February 21, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.4    | Certificate of Retirement of Stock filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware effective July 30, 2003 retiring the Class B common stock of Navistar International Corporation in accordance with the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2003, which was dated and filed on September 12, 2003. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.5    | The Amended and Restated By-Laws of Navistar International Corporation effective March 22, 2012. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K, which was dated and filed on March 22, 2012. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
|   |   |
| 3.6    | Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A filed with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware effective July 23, 2007 establishing the Series A Preferred Stock of Navistar International Corporation in accordance with the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International Corporation. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K which was dated and filed on July 23, 2007. Commission File No. 001-09618. |
### §12117. Oil spill response vessels

(a) Requirements.—A coastwise endorsement may be issued for a vessel that—

(1) satisfies the requirements for a coastwise endorsement, except for the ownership requirement otherwise applicable without regard to this section;

(2) is owned by a not-for-profit oil spill response cooperative or by members of such a cooperative that dedicate the vessel to use by the cooperative;

(3) is at least 50 percent owned by individuals or entities described in section 12103(b) of this title; and

(4) is to be used only for—

(i) deploying equipment, supplies, and personnel to recover, contain, or transport oil discharged into the navigable waters of the United States or the exclusive economic zone; or

(ii) training exercises to prepare to respond to such a discharge.

(b) Deemed Owned by Citizens.—A vessel satisfying subsection (a) is deemed to be owned only by citizens of the United States under sections 12103, 12132, and 50501 of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §5, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1499.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 12117 | 46:12106(d). | |

Section

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12117, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 100–710, title I, §104(a)(4), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4750, originally derived from section 65q of former Title 46, Shipping, related to recording of United States built vessels, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–304. See section 12137 of this title.
§ 882.404 Physical condition standards; physical inspection requirements. ( a ) *Compliance with physical condition standards.* Housing in this program must be maintained and inspected in accordance with the requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G.
( b ) *Space and security.* In addition to the standards in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, a dwelling unit used in the Section 8 moderate rehabilitation program that is not SRO housing must have a living room, a kitchen area, and a bathroom. Such a dwelling unit must have at least one bedroom or living/sleeping room for each two persons.
( c ) *Special housing types.* The following provisions in 24 CFR part 982, subpart M (Special Housing Types) apply to the Section 8 moderate rehabilitation program: ( 1 ) 24 CFR 982.605(b) (for SRO housing). For the Section 8 moderate rehabilitation SRO program under subpart H of this part 882, see also § 882.803(b).
( 2 ) 24 CFR 982.609(b) (for congregate housing).
( 3 ) 24 CFR 982.614(c) (for group homes).
[63 FR 46579, Sept. 1, 1998; 64 FR 50227, Sept. 15, 1999; 88 FR 30499, May 11, 2023]
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

PSB Holdings, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated September 21, 2007 related to the consolidated statements of financial condition of PSB Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2007 and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the June 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-KSB of PSB Holdings, Inc. 

/s/ WHITTLESEY & HADLEY, P.C. 

September 21, 2007 

Hartford, Connecticut
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-927V

Filed: September 21, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED

SARAH HENLEY, *

*

Petitioner, * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman

v. *

* Joint Stipulation of Dismissal;

* Postural Tachycardia Syndrome

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“POTS”).

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Kelly D. Burdette, Burkett & Burdette, Seattle, WA, for petitioner.

Voris E. Johnson, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent. 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On September 21, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal requesting that this 

claim be dismissed pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(b). In accordance with this rule, this case is 

hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed that judgment shall not 

enter in the instant case pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

 Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master

 

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, 

the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal 

Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided by Vaccine Rule 

18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by 

that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or 

confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would 

constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
§ 891.780 Adjustment of rents. ( a ) *Contract rents.* HUD will calculate contract rent adjustments based on the sum of the project's operating costs and debt service (as calculated by HUD), with adjustments for vacancies, the project's nonrental income, and other factors that HUD deems appropriate. The calculation will be made on the basis of information provided by the Borrower on a form prescribed by HUD.
( b ) *Rent for unassisted units.* The rent payable by families occupying units or residential spaces that are not assisted under the PAC shall be equal to the contract rent computed under paragraph (a) of this section.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
?Report?), I, Walter Davis, President, Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.









By:   /s/ Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		August 14, 2006
#### Larry WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lou A. HESSE, Supt. CCF; Joe Ortiz, Executive Director, CDOC; and John W. Suthers, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents-Ap-pellees. Larry White, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Mark McKinna, Supt. F.C.F. and John W. Suthers, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents-Ap-pellees.

Nos. 07-1093, 07-1029.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 4, 2007.

Larry White, Canon City, CO, pro se.

John W. Suthers, Attorney General, pro se.

Laurie A. Booras, State of Colorado Department of Law, Denver, CO, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before LUCERO, HARTZ, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

NEIL M. GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.

Larry White, a state prisoner incarcerated in Colorado, has litigated at least six previous federal habeas petitions before adding these two. Mr. White’s latest filings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 complain about alleged unfairness in his parole proceedings. But even construing his petitions with the generosity due *pro se*matters, the two separate district courts assessing them noted that they merely repeat allegations contained, or make arguments that could have been brought, in Mr. White’s many previous petitions. Accordingly, both district courts dismissed Mr. White’s latest filings pursuant to 28 *770U.S.C. § 2244. Both courts also warned Mr. White that any future repetitive filings will result in the imposition of sanctions; denied Mr. White’s applications for leave to pursue appeals *in forma pauper-is,*on the basis that his proposed appeals presented no reasoned argument in law or fact; and declined to issue Mr. White certificates of appealability (“COA”).

Our independent review of Mr. White’s proposed appellate filings confirms the appropriateness of each of these dispositions. Accordingly, we deny Mr. White’s requests for a COA, deny his requests to proceed *in forma pauperis,*deny his outstanding motions in this case, dismiss his appeals, and add our voice to those of the district courts in warning Mr. White that future repetitive or abusive filings in this court may be met by appropriate sanctions. *See Andrews v. Heaton,*483 F.3d 1070, 1077-78 (10th Cir.2007). *So ordered.*

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
#### § 241.1025 Refund of fees.

If the amount of the commitment issued is less than the amount applied for, the Commissioner shall refund the excess amount of the application and commitment fees submitted by the applicant. If an application is rejected before it is assigned for processing, or in such other instances as the Commissioner may determine, the entire application and commitment fees or any portion thereof may be returned to the applicant. Commitment and reopening fees may also be refunded to the applicant, in whole or in part, in such other instances as the Commissioner may determine.
### §8502. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) The term "severe energy supply interruption", when used with respect to motor fuel or any other energy source, means a national energy supply shortage of such energy source which the President determines—

(A) is, or is likely to be, of significant scope and duration;

(B) may cause major adverse impact on national security or the national economy; and

(C) results, or is likely to result, from an interruption in the energy supplies of the United States, including supplies of imported petroleum products, or from sabotage or an act of God.

(2) The term "international energy program" has the meaning given that term in section 6202(7) of this title.

(3) The term "motor fuel" means gasoline and diesel fuel.

(4) The term "person" includes (A) any individual, (B) any corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, trust, joint venture, or joint stock company, and (C) the government or any agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof.

(5) The term "vehicle" means any vehicle propelled by motor fuel and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways.

(6) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy.

(7) The term "Governor" means the chief executive officer of a State.

(8) The term "State" means a State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–102, title II, §202, Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 757.)
§ 886.307 Physical condition standards; physical inspection requirements. ( a ) *General.* Housing assisted under this part must be maintained and inspected in accordance with the requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G.
( b ) - ( m ) [Reserved]
( n ) *Independent group residence.* In addition to the foregoing standards, the standards in 24 CFR 887.467 (a) through (g) apply to independent group residences.
[44 FR 70365, Dec. 6, 1979, as amended at 50 FR 9269, Mar. 7, 1985; 52 FR 1986, Jan. 15, 1987; 57 FR 33852, July 30, 1992; 58 FR 43722, Aug. 17, 1993; 63 FR 46580, Sept. 1, 1998; 64 FR 50227, Sept. 15, 1999; 88 FR 30500, May 11, 2023]
#### § 904.309 Use of appendices.

Use of the Articles of Incorporation (Part I of Appendix I) and the Recognition Agreement between the Local Housing Authority and Homebuyers Association (Appendix II) is mandatory for projects developed under subpart B of this part which have homebuyers associations. No modification may be made in format, content or text of these Appendices except (1) as required under state or local law as determined by HUD or (2) with approval of HUD. The By-Laws of the Homebuyers Association is provided as a guide for such projects and it may be used or modified to the extent required by the HBA and LHA respectively to meet local needs and desires.
#### State Division of Human Rights, Respondent, v Sheraton Gatehouse Motor Inn, Petitioner. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Petition granted, order and determination unanimously annulled, on the law and facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed. Same memorandum as in *State Div. of Human Rights v Gannett Co.*(61 AD2d 1134). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ.
#### In re MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK. In re STATION PLACE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 20, 1903.)

In the matter of the mayor, etc., of the city of New York. In re Station Place. P. ,M. Brett, for appellant J. P. Dunn, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### §2102. Limited definitions

In chapters 33, 45, 51, 81, and 87 of this title, "Aleutian trade" means the transportation of cargo (including fishery related products) for hire on board a fish tender vessel to or from a place in Alaska west of 153 degrees west longitude and east of 172 degrees east longitude, if that place receives weekly common carrier service by water, to or from a place in the United States (except a place in Alaska).

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 505; Pub. L. 98–369, div. A, title X, §1011(a), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1013; Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5102(b)(2), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1926; Pub. L. 101–595, title VI, §602(a), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2990; Pub. L. 109–304, §§15(3), 16(a), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1702, 1705.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 2102 | 46:1452(10)–(14) |

Section 2102 contains a number of definitions that are limited to recreational vessels in Chapter 43 of Part B and the numbering of these vessels in Chapter 123 of Part H.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–304 redesignated subsec. (b) as entire section, substituted "west" for "West" and "east" for "East", and struck out subsec. (a) which defined "eligible State", "State", "United States", and "State recreational boating safety program" in chapters 37, 43, 51, and 123 of this title and part I of this subtitle.

1990—Pub. L. 101–595 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

1986—Pub. L. 99–509 inserted reference to chapters 37 and 51.

1984—Par. (1). Pub. L. 98–369, §1011(a)(1), struck out "and facilities improvement" after "recreational boating safety".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 98–369, §1011(a)(2), (3), redesignated par. (5) as (3) and struck out former par. (3) which defined a State recreational boating facilities improvement program.

Par. (4). Pub. L. 98–369, §1011(a)(2), struck out par. (4) which defined State recreational boating safety and facilities improvement program.

Par. (5). Pub. L. 98–369, §1011(a)(3), redesignated par. (5) as (3).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–369 effective Oct. 1, 1984, to apply with respect to fiscal years beginning after Sept. 30, 1984, see section 1013 of Pub. L. 98–369, set out as a note under section 13101 of this title.
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 203566, styled The State of Texas v. Randall Douglas, pending in 1

the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Monica Guerrero presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00498-CR

IN RE Randall DOUGLAS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 14, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
§ 599.203 Basic application submission requirements. The basic application submission requirements for nominating an area as a Renewal Community are: ( a ) *Identification of the nominated area.* An application must identify the census tracts that constitute the nominated area. The nominated area must meet all of the eligibility requirements of subpart B of this part.
( b ) *State and local commitments.* An application must include the documents evidencing compliance with State and local commitments required by § 599.107.
( c ) *Public notice certification.* An application must include a certification, signed by a responsible official or employee of each nominating State and local government, that the public was provided notice of, and an opportunity to participate in, the application development process. Notice and opportunity to participate may include procedures such as placing announcements in newspapers or other media, holding public meetings, and soliciting comments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                278125
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 79316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 198809
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             198809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    198809
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.96
        

</TABLE>
### §4705. Liability of barge removal contractors

(a) A barge removal contractor and its subcontractor are not liable for damages that result from actions taken or omitted to be taken in the course of removing a barge under this chapter.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply—

(1) with respect to personal injury or wrongful death; or

(2) if the contractor or subcontractor is grossly negligent or engages in willful misconduct.

(Added Pub. L. 102–587, title V, §5302, Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5083; amended Pub. L. 109–304, §15(19), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1703.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–304 in subsec. (a) struck out par. (1) designation before "A barge removal" and substituted "subcontractor are not" for "subcontractor not", redesignated par. (2) as subsec. (b) and subpars. (A) and (B) of former par. (2) as pars. (1) and (2) of subsec. (b), respectively, and substituted "Subsection (a)" for "Paragraph (1)".
§ 4.34 Review of Inspector General's report by the Ethics Law Division. After receipt of the Inspector General's report, the Ethics Law Division shall review the facts and circumstances of the alleged violations. In addition, the Ethics Law Division may: ( a ) Return the report to the Inspector General with a request for further investigation;
( b ) Discuss the violation with the employee alleged to have committed the violation; or
( c ) Interview any other person, including employees who it believes will be helpful in furnishing information relevant to the inquiry.
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### § 5.856 When must I prohibit admission of sex offenders?

You must establish standards that prohibit admission to federally assisted housing if any member of the household is subject to a lifetime registration requirement under a State sex offender registration program. In the screening of applicants, you must perform necessary criminal history background checks in the State where the housing is located and in other States where the household members are known to have resided. (See § 5.905.)