alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 19—ROCK ISLAND RAILROAD EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE**

Sec.
1001.
Congressional findings.
1002.
Definitions.
1003.
Service continuation.
1004.
Railroad hiring.
1005.
Employee protection agreement.
1006.
Repealed.
1007.
Election.
1008.
Repealed.
1009.
Expedited proceedings.
1010.
Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act and section 6362(b) of title 42.
1011.
Authority of Railroad Retirement Board.
1012.
Publications and reports.
1013.
Repealed.
1014.
New career training assistance.
1015.
Repealed.
1016.
Temporary rail banking.
1017.
Temporary operating approval.
1018.
Judicial review.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Zeilnhofer, William Zeilnhofer, Jay S. Dashefski, and Gary Srour, Appellants.

Appeals by defendants from four judgments (one as to each of them) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, each rendered March 29, 1977, convicting them of possession or transportation for the purpose of sale of unstamped or unlawfully stamped cigarettes, as a misdemeanor, upon their pleas of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed *(People v Tuzzino,*54 AD2d 744; *People v Rizzo,*40 NY2d 425, 430; *People v Giammarino,*53 AD2d 871, affd 42 NY2d 1090). These cases are remitted to the Criminal Term for further proceedings in accordance with CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
### §9121. Suspension, revocation, and termination of licenses

#### (a) Filing of action by Attorney General; automatic suspension

Whenever a licensee fails to comply with any applicable provision of this chapter or any applicable rule, regulation, restriction, or condition issued or imposed by the Administrator under the authority of this chapter, the Attorney General, at the request of the Administrator, shall file an action in the appropriate United States district court to—

(1) suspend the license; or

(2) if such failure is knowing and continues for a period of 30 days after the Administrator mails notification of such failure by registered letter to the licensee at his record post office address, revoke such license.

No proceeding under this section is necessary if the license, by its terms, provides for automatic suspension or termination upon the occurrence of a fixed or agreed upon condition, event, or time.

#### (b) Immediate suspension of construction or operation pending completion of proceedings

If the Administrator determines that immediate suspension of the construction or operation of an ocean thermal energy conversion facility or plantship or any component thereof is necessary to protect public health and safety or to eliminate imminent and substantial danger to the environment the Administrator may order the licensee to cease or alter such construction or operation pending the completion of a judicial proceeding pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title I, §111, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 988; Pub. L. 98–623, title VI, §602(e)(17), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–320, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 974, known as the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–623 substituted "environment" for "environment established by any treaty or convention,".
| **Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Tables)**                        | 6 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| **Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss                                     | Total accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, consisted of the following: June 30, 2012December 31, 2011Foreign currency translation adjustments$(306)$(304)Pension and other postretirement benefits(232)(251)Net gain on hedge transactions1—Total accumulated other comprehensive loss$(537)$(555) |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeLossNetOfTaxAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Tabular disclosure of the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_ScheduleOfAccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeLossTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION IX
 

75 Hawthorne Street
 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
 

OFFICE OF THE September 21, 2010 REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

The Honorable Jan Brewer 

Governor of Arizona 

1700 West Washington 

Phoenix, AZ 85007 

Dear Governor Brewer: 

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) is proposing to redesignate a portion of Pinal County as "nonattainment" for the 1987 24­

hour coarse particle (PMIQ) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). 

On October 14,2009, my predecessor, Laura Yoshii, sent you a letter informing you that, 

based on continuing violations of the PMIQ NAAQS in Pinal County, EPA had determined that a 

revised designation for the 1987 24-hour PMIQ NAAQS would be necessary. Thank you for your 

March 23, 2010 letter, in which you provided a recommended nonattainment area boundary for 

the 1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS. We have completed our evaluation and intend to redesignate a 

portion of Pinal County "nonattainment," as described in the enclosed detailed analysis. We 

propose to retain the current designations for the remaining State lands in Pinal County. 

A notice inviting public comment on our proposal will be published in the Federal 

Register in the near future. I have enclosed a pre-publication copy with this letter. Should you 

have additional information that you wish to be considered by EPA in this process, please 

provide it to us by the end of the comment period. We intend to make final designation decisions 

for the 1987 24-hour PM,o NAAQS for areas addressed in the current proposal before the end of 

2010. 

We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff to develop area 

designations. After we finalize our redesignation for the PMIQ NAAQS for this area, EPA will 

work with your staff to develop an appropriate State Implementation Plan to assure the public 

health protections intended by the standard. Your air quality staff may wish to contact Deborah 

Jordan, Air Division Director at 415-947-8715 or Colleen McKaughan, Associate Air Division 

Director at 520-498-0118. 

ed Blumenfeld 

egional Administrator 

Enclosures 

cc: See next page 

Print~d on !<t'CYC/t'd Paper 
cc:	 (via email) 

Benjamin H. Grumbles, Director, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

Nancy Wrona, Senior Policy Advisor to the Director, Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality 

Eric Massey, Director, Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality 

Don Gabrielson, Director, Pinal County Air Quality Control District 

William Wiley, Director, Maricopa County Air Quality Department 

Ursula Kramer, Director, Pima County Department of Environmental Quality 

2
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Greetings Aq: 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Monday, March 23, 2015 10:05 AM 

'atotemoff@tatitlek.com'; 'nkompkoff@tatitlek.com'; 'bcrumley@chugachschools.com'; 

'olen@nprha.com'; 'dtotemoff@rocketmail.com'; 'grace.hoover@chugach.com'; 

'thopper@chugach.com'; 'communications@chugach.com'; 'jjohnson@chugach.com'; 

'communications@chugach.com'; 'Info@Chugachmiut.org' 

'Rachel'; 'Michael Reeve, Reeve Air Alaska'; 'Jason Ward'; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

Update on Essential Air Service at Tatitlek, AK 

Alaska Air Transit.pdf; Reeve Air Alaska.pdf; Security Aviation.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Tatitlek, as well as give you an 

opportunity to offer any comments for the formal record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant 

Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. As you may know, the Department issued Order 2015-2-4, on 

February 9, 2015, requesting proposals from air carriers interested in providing EAS at Tatitlek for a new term 

beginning October I, 2015. In response to the Department's request, Alaska Air Transit, Reeve Air Alaska, and 

Security Aviation submitted proposals for consideration. 

I have attached those proposals to this email and expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime 

this afternoon. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as 

possible, but no later than April 24.2015. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

scott.faulk@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution 

list. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Scott Faulk 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202-366-9967 

1 

. . ' '-' 

·.C 

>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DAMIEN ROSS, DOC #S05502, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1122

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 6, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge. 

Damien Ross, pro se.

 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### § 574.400 Prohibition of substitution of funds.

Amounts received from grants under this part may not be used to replace other amounts made available or designated by State or local governments through appropriations for use for the purposes of this part.
### §422. Construction of dams across Yellowstone River

Where, in carrying out projects under the provisions of the national reclamation Act it shall be necessary to construct dams in or across the Yellowstone River in the State of Montana, the Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized to construct and use and operate the same in the manner and for the purposes contemplated by said reclamation Act.

(Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1476, 33 Stat. 1045.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The national reclamation Act, referred to in text, probably means act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 13.1

906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Qindai Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has
not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: June 15,
2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Qindai Wang        
|Qindai Wang            
|Chief Executive Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors
Rand Logistics, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-143291 and 333-117051) of our report dated
March 3, 2006, included in this Form 10-KSB relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Rand Logistics, Inc. (formerly Rand Acquisition
Corporation) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP

GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

June 28, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 315 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 315

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2005

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Milton 
Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 8, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §543. Certificate of final payment and release of lien

Upon full and final payment being made of all amounts due on account of the building and betterment charges to the United States or its successors in control of the project, the United States or its successors, as the case may be, shall issue upon request a certificate certifying that payment of the building and betterment charges in full has been made and that the lien upon the land has been so far satisfied and is no longer of any force or effect except the lien for annual charges for operation and maintenance.

(Aug. 9, 1912, ch. 278, §3, 37 Stat. 266.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section comprises part of section 3 of act Aug. 9, 1912. Remainder of section 3 is set out as section 544 of this title.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ROBERT MICHAEL SALAZAR, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 16-50351

 16-50352

D.C. Nos. 2:97-cr-00009-PA

 2:07-cr-00619-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 11, 2017**

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Robert Michael Salazar appeals from the 

district court’s judgment and challenges the 20-month concurrent sentences

imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 17 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-50351 & 16-50352

Salazar contends that the district court procedurally erred by relying on facts 

not supported by the record in imposing an above-Guidelines sentence, and by 

failing to explain the sentence adequately. We review for plain error, see United 

States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude 

that there is none. The record does not support Salazar’s argument that when 

imposing the sentence, the district court relied on an assumption that Salazar was 

driving under the influence. Rather, the record reflects that the district court 

considered Salazar’s history of drug use, which was well documented in the 

record, and sufficiently explained its determination that an above-Guidelines 

sentence was warranted. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 

2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Document

Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO THE


BENTLEY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
BONUS POOL PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of September 22, 2020)


    WHEREAS, Bentley Systems, Incorporated (the “Company”) amended and restated the Bentley Systems, Incorporated Bonus Pool Plan (the “Bonus Pool Plan”), effective as of September 22, 2020;


    WHEREAS, Section 6(g) of the Bonus Pool Plan provides that, subject to certain inapplicable limitations, the “Nonemployee Directors,” as defined in the Bonus Pool Plan, in their sole discretion, reserve the right to amend the Bonus Pool Plan from time to time; and


    WHEREAS, the Nonemployee Directors desire to amend the Bonus Pool Plan to modify Exhibit A thereof and have unanimously approved the amendments set forth herein;


    NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of November 2, 2022, Appendix A of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as set forth on Schedule I hereto.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed this 2nd day of November, 2022.


BENTLEY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED




By: /s/ David R. Shaman        
       Name: David R. Shaman
       Title:   Chief Legal Officer and Secretary


 






Schedule I


BENTLEY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
 
BONUS POOL PLAN
 
APPENDIX A
 
																		
	Participant	 	First
Fractional
Interest for
2022*	 	Second
Fractional
Interest for
2022*	 
	Greg Bentley	 	12/33	 	12/33	 
	Keith Bentley	 	7/33	 	7/33	 
	David Hollister	 	4/33	**	4/33	**


 
* The First and Second Fractional Interests will be in place each successive calendar year for each Participant unless and until the Nonemployee Directors change or revoke one or both of them for such Participant.
 
Further, neither (i) the proration of a Participant’s Bonus under Section 3(b) for a calendar quarter or the elimination of a Participant’s First and Second Fractional Interests for future calendar quarters, in each case due to the Participant’s Termination of Employment, nor (ii) the reduction in a Participant’s First and Second Fractional Interests under Section 3(c) due to the Participant’s less than full-time employment, shall result in or cause any change in the First and Second Fractional Interests of the remaining Participants, even though neither the sum of such First Fractional Interests nor the sum of such Second Fractional Interests for such remaining Participants equals 1.0.


** Effective for current year payouts and thereafter, one-third of David Hollister’s First and Second Fractional Interests shall be multiplied by a coefficient determined by calculating the annual increase (or decrease) in value of the BSY Investments portfolio, taking into account applicable fees and an annual hurdle rate.  The calculation of such coefficient shall be approved by the Nonemployee Directors.


- 2 -
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

#### § 17.11 Final denial of claim.

Final denial of an administrative claim shall be in writing, and notification of denial shall be sent to the claimant, his attorney, or legal representative by certified or registered mail. The notification of final denial may include a statement of the reasons for the denial and shall include a statement that, if the claimant is dissatisfied with the Department action, he may file suit in an appropriate U.S. District Court not later than 6 months after the date of mailing of the notification.