alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVE D JUN E 8 , 201 1 , ' ^ipji^ f f,j j Q F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTIO N ' " ' OPcR A 1 !0i^JOFFIC E OFHEARING S WASHINGTON,D.C . :. M nj; ; - 8 P 2 - 1 3 I N TH E MATTE RO F Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc . FA A DOCKE T NO , CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-002 3 ORDERON BRIEFIN GSCHEDULE Th e partie s wil

l file closing brief

s focusin g on th e issu e o f

airworthines s i

n accordanc e wit h th e following schedule . Th e Federa l Aviatio n Admmistralion (hereinafte r "Complainant" ) shall file it s closing brie f

no late r tha n Jul y 7 , 2011 . Within 1 4 day s o f receip t o f Complainant' s Brief , Responden

t Rushot e Helicopters , Inc . (hereinafte r "Respondent" ) shall file it s Respons e Brief . Complainan

t ma y file areply brief

within 7 day s o f

receipt o f Respondent' s Respons e Brief .

Richar dC . Goodwin Administrativ e La

w Judg e

Attachmen t - Servic e Lis t

### ^5F^^^^w?fr ^ •PiPPif i V:ti { 4JH'J-'-.' ^ FA

A Docket No . CP10GL0002 • : IW^^-^-^-tCivi l Penalt y Action) 

# omGmmmmU'COTY Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . 4fsf«i^:»'^^*' 4 ^ - - Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Cl«|rlc» | Wilbu r Wrigh t BuiWi l Michae l Jacob , Responden t Presiden t o r CE O Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc . 2456 4 Highwa y 16/38 5 Custer , S D 5773 0 . ^ S .*?* • '« • k- ' Bria^ aMartino , Complainant' s Coum^ j |^^i % I**;i.:

> Grea t Lake s Region , AGL- 7 ,)' \ Fed^a l Aviation Administration *' ^ mik^-^.' - -C;-

. > 2300.Eas t Devon Avenue : » ^ ffl S t v|? » j «v . DesPlaines,I L 60018-469 6 k .TEL : 847-294-731 3 l^.-i^i^' M .'- ^ FAX : 847-294-749 8 ..bT-itelW'*;,^ - ' Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , AiM^m? ^ IM WJudg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , RoomElt-32( > Washington , D C 2059 0 % \^EL : 202-366-213 9 Attomey-Ad# ^ 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assisltflk.l ^ FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Savic e wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Ind^ i 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : ier , useth e Wrigh t AGC-430 .
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3169

AN ACT

To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver 

disaster. Grants who are adversely affected by a natural authority for students who are eligible for Pell 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3169

AN ACT

To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority 

for students who are eligible for Pell Grants who are 

adversely affected by a natural disaster.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 3169 EH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pell Grant Hurricane 

3 and Disaster Relief Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WAIVERS OF PELL GRANT REPAYMENT BY STU5 DENTS AFFECTED BY DISASTERS. 

6 Section 484B(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 

7 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091b(b)(2)) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) WAIVERS OF PELL GRANT REPAY10 MENT BY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY DISAS11 TERS.—The Secretary may waive the amounts 

12 that students are required to return under this 

13 section with respect to Pell grants if the with14 drawals on which the returns are based are 

15 withdrawals—

16 ‘‘(i) by students—

17 ‘‘(I) who were residing in, em18 ployed in, or attending an institution 

19 of higher education that is located in 

20 an area that is designated by the 

21 President to warrant major disaster 

22 assistance under section 401 of the 

23 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

24 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 

25 U.S.C. 5170); and 
3

•HR 3169 EH 

1 ‘‘(II) whose attendance was inter2 rupted because of the impact of the 

3 disaster on the student or the institu4 tion; and 

5 ‘‘(ii) that end within the academic 

6 year during which the designation occurred 

7 or during the next succeeding academic 

8 year.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 7, 

2005. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 75.29 Multiple funding sources. ( a ) If a housing rehabilitation, housing construction or other public construction project is subject to Section 3 pursuant to § 75.3(a)(1) and (2), the recipient must follow subpart B of this part for the public housing financial assistance and may follow either subpart B or C of this part for the housing and community development financial assistance. For such a project, the following applies: ( 1 ) For housing and community development financial assistance, a Targeted Section 3 worker is any worker who meets the definition of a Targeted Section 3 worker in either subpart B or C of this part; and
( 2 ) The recipients of both sources of funding shall report on the housing rehabilitation, housing construction, or other public construction project as a whole and shall identify the multiple associated recipients. PHAs and other recipients must report the following information: ( i ) The total number of labor hours worked on the project;
( ii ) The total number of labor hours worked by Section 3 workers on the project; and
( iii ) The total number of labor hours worked by Targeted Section 3 workers on the project.
( b ) If a housing rehabilitation, housing construction, or other public construction project is subject to Section 3 because the project is assisted with funding from multiple sources of housing and community development assistance that exceed the thresholds in § 75.3(a)(2), the recipient or recipients must follow subpart C of this part, and must report to the applicable HUD program office, as prescribed by HUD.
§ 570.507 Reports. ( a ) *Performance and evaluation report* — ( 1 ) *Entitlement grant recipients and HUD-administered small cities recipients in Hawaii.* The annual performance and evaluation report shall be submitted in accordance with 24 CFR part 91.
( 2 ) *HUD-administered Small Cities recipients in New York, and Hawaii recipients for pre-FY 1995 grants* — ( i ) *Content.* Each performance and evaluation report must contain completed copies of all forms and narratives prescribed by HUD, including a summary of the citizen comments received on the report.
( ii ) *Timing.* The performance and evaluation report on each grant shall be submitted: ( A ) No later than October 31 for all grants executed before April 1 of the same calendar year. The first report should cover the period from the execution of the grant until September 30. Reports on grants made after March 31 of a calendar year will be due October 31 of the following calendar year, and the reports will cover the period of time from the execution of the grant until September 30 of the calendar year following grant execution. After the initial submission, the performance and evaluation report will be submitted annually on October 31 until completion of the activities funded under the grant;
( B ) Hawaii grantees will submit their small cities performance and evaluation report for each pre-FY 1995 grant no later than 90 days after the completion of their most recent program year. After the initial submission, the performance and evaluation report will be submitted annually until completion of the activities funded under the grant; and
( C ) No later than 90 days after the criteria for grant closeout, as described in § 570.509(a), have been met.
( iii ) *Citizen comments on the report.* Each recipient shall make copies of the performance and evaluation report available to its citizens in sufficient time to permit the citizens to comment on the report before its submission to HUD. Each recipient may determine the specific manner and times the report will be made available to citizens consistent with the preceding sentence.
( b ) *Equal employment opportunity reports.* Recipients of entitlement grants or HUD-administered small cities grants shall submit to HUD each year a report (HUD/EEO-4) on recipient employment containing data as of June 30.
( c ) *Minority business enterprise reports.* Recipients of entitlement grants, HUD-administered small cities grants or Urban Development Action Grants shall submit to HUD, by April 30, a report on contracts and subcontract activity during the first half of the fiscal year and by October 31 a report on such activity during the second half of the year.
( d ) *Other reports.* Recipients may be required to submit such other reports and information as HUD determines are necessary to carry out its responsibilities under the Act or other applicable laws.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 2506-0077 for paragraph (a) and 2529-0008 for paragraph (b) and 2506-0066 for paragraph (c)) [53 FR 34456, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 1916, Jan. 5, 1995; 61 FR 32269, June 21, 1996]
### §§161 to 164. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787

Section 161, R.S. §2289; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §5, 26 Stat. 1097, related to entry of unappropriated public lands.

Section 162, R.S. §2290; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §5, 26 Stat. 1097; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to application for entry on public lands, and contents for affidavit for application.

Section 163, R.S. §2295; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to record of application, registration, and return to Bureau of Land Management.

Section 164, R.S. §2291; June 6, 1912, ch. 153, 37 Stat. 123, related to issuance, etc., of certificate or patent for entered lands.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787, provided that the repeal made by section 702 is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, except such effective date to be on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as homestead laws apply to public lands in Alaska.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
§ 1003.401 Application process. ( a ) *Letter to proceed.* The Area ONAP may issue the applicant a letter to proceed to incur costs to alleviate imminent threats to health and safety only if the assisted activities do not alter environmental conditions and are for temporary or permanent improvements limited to protection, repair, or restoration actions necessary only to control or arrest the effects of imminent threats or physical deterioration. Reimbursement of such costs is dependent upon HUD approval of the application.
( b ) *Applications.* Applications shall include the information specified in the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
( c ) *Application approval.* Applications which meet the requirement of this section may be approved by the Area ONAP without competition in accordance with the applicable requirements of § 1003.304.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2577-0191)
### Archive of digital and digitized analog boomer seismic reflection data collected during USGS cruise 96CCT02 in Copano, Corpus Christi, and Nueces Bays and Corpus Christi Bayou, Texas, July 1996

By: Arnell S. Harrison**Shawn V. DadismanJack L. KindingerRobert A. MortonMike D. BlumDana S. WieseJanice A. Subiño

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds296

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

In June of 1996, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted geophysical surveys from Nueces to Copano Bays, Texas. This report serves as an archive of unprocessed digital boomer seismic reflection data, trackline maps, navigation files, GIS information, cruise log, and formal FGDC metadata. Filtered and gained digital images of the seismic profiles and high resolution scanned TIFF images of the original paper printouts are also provided.

The archived trace data are in standard Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) SEG-Y format (Barry and others, 1975) and may be downloaded and processed with commercial or public domain software such as Seismic Unix (SU). Example SU processing scripts and USGS software for viewing the SEG-Y files (Zihlman, 1992) are also provided.
I'pl:!-.:<7-99 16,54 FROM,**8U~CAU** OF AIR MANCEMENT 10, 860 424 4063 PACE 2 

# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

S'IATE I II-" 

### I ·ONNECTIr.1 IT :Illd**V.~I.L** lINIVFI{";! IV 

### TRADING NiREI"ivll,Nl AND ORDER NO.**~J** 

### 1(1 MOlliFICATION


### J ((ALlINI; AS.H'hl'MI'NJflNIJ IJl\IWR MUIIIII<jITION III thl' m;\lh',. uJ' a Trading Agn,:t.:m":111 and UrJ..:r hctVYt.:cll the**t\lIllmi~sillnl.:r** or**Fllvironmt:nt~1 I'rnh.:~,i(ll\**  (""( 'otllllli:-.sioner") :lIld YalL' I JniVt:rsily (""Yak''). WIIEREAS. til..:**<"\llIl1llissilln~r** and Y:lh
... having agreed lolhl,,' Il,:rlllS <Il1d conditions 51-:1 lill'lll in Trilliing**i\~rCl:llll'l1l** ,IIH1 Ordl:r Nil. Jo:; II () IsslJl
... ·d on July 1(), J t}()(l. dll now, hy mutual**~\gl't.:l:llll:I\L** Il1lll.!!!:"**pnr~lgraph:,;** A. J7., D,2., F. 

### .1. ;ll1d [.'.11. 

### as follows: 

### I, Ck1l1)!l.: 

### Ill,.; d:l\l'**SPl.:(;iJjl~U** II) 

### Ih,.; 

### lnfil
.... l:nll'nc,.;**oj'p:lr;l~r;lph** 

### A.17. J'rum 

### May J, J t)C)') 10 

### May 1.2001. 1, (·h;tlll,.'.C till: St.:l'Olld dale spl,;L'ilil,:d in th..: C)l,;l;ond pilr:lgr:lph wilhin pari.lgruph r),2, (r\llll**M~IY** 

### 1. 191.)9 hi 

### M;IY I, 

### '2(JO."i, 

### :1. ('h;mj;c Ihl' first liillc**spc~'jfjcU** 

### ill 11lL' sl.:c.:ond paragraph
...... 'ILhin pnragraph 1-'.3. from Sq>l<':lllhcr I, I C)(JX It) Scptemb":l 

### J.**~O()?.** ·1, ('h:lIll,;,L: Ihe scc.:l'llltl da!c spl'(ilil'd ill till' sl.:l'ond**J1i\r:l~'.r"ph** within paral;rl1ph F,l I"rUJll M:IY \, ) ()l)l) ll) Muy 1.**?()()~** .

. 'i. ('h;lllJ;l' the iiI'S!**d~11t:** sp";l·iljl..'d in**J);Ir:.I~r:JJ1h** F.I J. I"nf!l1**~1:ly** 

### l. 1 I)')l) In May 

### J.**~OO.1,**

(!'nnICc! On II.cc)clcd "'.pc.r) 19 lOlHl Slrc.c.l • Ihnfnrd, CT UIII06. S121**hll?:/fdcp,IIlIC,~I.U'** All £1/"';11 0PP'''fl""ry Ernr'oyu 

# 1""< fZ[ 

# /;7" 

### , YAI.E lINIVI'RSll'Y 

### 2 I
.... · ......... ..., .........



### lR,\DIN(i AGRF.EMr:NT AI D OIWI'R 0, XI Itl 

### MODII'lCATIO

./ All u11lL'1'**I\~nll~** ;l11d cunditiollS ofTr'I<.ling Agn:-:.tllCnl and Order Nu. R II 0 issl1L:d hy t.hL: l.'ullllnis:--illt1L:1' ucting 

### lllllh.:r SL:l.:Liu!1s 

### 22i.1·(), 22a·171, 2'2u·174, 2:l'1·17(1. 221.1-177 and 

### 22a·17X 

# or lhl.:**ClIIlI1L~l.:liult** (i-:llL:r,d St;l\uLcs**sh~dl** 

### l"l::ll1,lin in d'fl.:CL 

### Yak tJnivL:rsily Ill.'l"chy**L:UJlSL'IIt~** 

### to lllL: l,:lllry**~d"lhis** IllmJific:lliull 

### to rill.: Tradlug J\grcl.'l1lcnt ilml ()nkr wilhtlllt furlhl'l"**JlI)(ic:~.**

" TypL:**NaJll~** Typl'TitlL': 

### ___ --1Qseph ':: MuHi:.:.o:.:.lx

_ Vice Presidenr for Finance 8. Administrorion 

# ,-,--**..J,!~<-.::JL_** 

### 191)'), I :ntl:ll.:d "" ;l 11 II Kl i Jil.:;Jlil)ll 

### of illl Ordt:.r 

### ld" thl.: l' umm**i~:'Iiu** 

### er 

# or Envi rUlllnclltal Proted 

### ion nUlTlb.::n:tl Rll0this

_ 

# Ai

'J, R""I"", .II', u IHISS10ilLT tHY 01 NI'IV II!\VI',N LAND Rn:Ol{l)S MAILEIl 

### l"I'Rl""UJ MAil
..

11I,:TIIRN RI',CUP'!' REQlIESTi'D 1 \;ninL:d 

### ! )11('.1I11lL:1J( NIl.
#### Don C. Coultrap, appellee, v. E. McNeal & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,684.

Suit for damages for breach of contract to supply certain oil stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 9, 1923.

Rehearing denied May 23, 1923.

W. J. Lewis and Adams, Follansbee, Hawley & Shorey, for appellant; Melvin M. Hawley, 'Robert W. Schupp and Fred Barth, of counsel. Ogden & Traxler, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §1210. Other disposition

If the Secretary has not certified that the State has satisfied the conditions under section 1203 of this title within one year after the date of delivery of the report referred to in section 1204(a) of this title, the Secretary may dispose of the rail properties of the Alaska Railroad. Any disposal under this section shall give preference to a buyer or transferee who will continue to operate rail service, except that—

(1) such preference shall not diminish or modify the rights of the Cook Inlet Region, Incorporated (as that term is used in section 12 of the Act of January 2, 1976 (Public Law 94–204; 89 Stat. 1150)), pursuant to such section, as amended by section 606(d) of this title; 1 and

(2) this section shall not be construed to diminish or modify the powers of consent of the Secretary or the State under section 12(b)(8) of such Act, as amended by section 606(d)(5) of this title.1

Any disposal under this section shall be subject to valid existing rights.

(Pub. L. 97–468, title VI, §611, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 12 of the Act of January 2, 1976, referred to in pars. (1) and (2), is section 12 of Pub. L. 94–204, Jan. 2, 1976, 89 Stat. 1150, which is set out as a note under section 1611 of Title 43, Public Lands.

Section 606(d) of this title, referred to in pars. (1) and (2), means section 606(d) of title VI of Pub. L. 97–468, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2566.

1 See References in Text note below.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10333

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MOSES VALDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-58-3

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Moses Valdez has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Valdez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 19, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10333 Document: 00511450307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
No. 10-10333

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-10333 Document: 00511450307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
### §182. Duties, penalties, benefits, and privileges of subchapter I applicable

The duties, requirements, penalties, benefits, and privileges prescribed and established by the provisions of subchapter I of this chapter except section 153 of this title shall apply to said carriers by air and their employees in the same manner and to the same extent as though such carriers and their employees were specifically included within the definition of "carrier" and "employee", respectively, in section 151 of this title.

(May 20, 1926, ch. 347, §202, as added Apr. 10, 1936, ch. 166, 49 Stat. 1189.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9825867.1 STIP. AND [PROP’D] ORDER RESETTING: 

HEARING DATE; CV-09-2124 SI

MARTIN D. BERN (SBN 153203) 

Martin.Bern@mto.com 

MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (SBN 194174) 

Malcolm.Heinicke@mto.com 

YUVAL MILLER (SBN 243492) 

Yuval.Miller@mto.com 

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 

Telephone: (415) 512-4000 

Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 

Attorneys for Defendant 

GUARDSMARK, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 

PHILLIP TEMPLE, on behalf of himself, 

individually, and all others similarly 

situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs.

GUARDSMARK, LLC, and DOES 1 

through 100, INCLUSIVE, 

Defendant.

CASE NO. CV-09-2124-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RESETTING HEARING DATE FOR 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT

Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston 

Date: March 5, 2010 

Time: 9:00 a.m. 

Location: Courtroom 10, 19th Floor

Case 3:09-cv-02124-SI Document 43 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

9825867.1

- 1 - STIP. AND [PROP’D] ORDER RESETTING 

HEARING DATE; CV-09-2124 SI

WHEREAS, on November 11, 2009, counsel for Defendant Guardsmark, LLC 

filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“the Motion”) in this matter; 

WHEREAS, the Court issued an order on January 11, 2010 pursuant to the 

stipulation of the parties resetting both the hearing on the Motion and a related case 

management conference to March 5, 2010; 

WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated to move the hearing date for the Motion to 

March 26, 2010, in order to allow time for the completion of certain depositions before 

Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due;

WHEREAS, the parties have stipulated that Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion 

will be filed and served no later than February 26, 2010; 

THEREFORE, through their counsel of record, the parties stipulate as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, that Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion must be served 

and filed no later than February 26, 2010, and that the hearing date for the Motion, and the date 

for the case management conference, be reset for March 26, 2010. 

DATED: January 29, 2010 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 

MARTIN D. BERN 

MALCOLM A. HEINICKE 

YUVAL MILLER 

By: /s/ Martin D. Bern 

MARTIN D. BERN 

Attorneys for Defendants 

GUARDSMARK, LLC 

DATED: January 29, 2010 QUALLS & WORKMAN, L.L.P. 

By: /s/ Daniel H. Qualls 

DANIEL H. QUALLS 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

PHILLIP TEMPLE 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: _____________________ ____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Susan Illston 

Case 3:09-cv-02124-SI Document 43 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2