# Patent

## Title
Nucleic acid sequences from Salmonella typhi for in vitro diagnosis in

## Abstract

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/038,763, now abandoned, filed as pct/dk92/00391, Dec. 18, 1992, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

## Background
The present invention relates to processes for preparing an active lipase enzyme in vitro, a DNA construct encoding the lipase, a recombinant vector including the DNA construct, as well as a host cell transformed with the vector.

Lipases are enzymes which catalyze the hydrolysis of ester bonds in triglycerides resulting in the formation of diglycerides, monoglycerides, glycerin and free fatty acids. Some lipases also catalyze other reactions involving ester bonds such as synthesis of ester bonds or transesterification reactions. Lipases are produced by a wide variety of different organisms. Microbial lipases in particular are of considerable practical utility for a variety of purposes where lipolysis of fats is desired, e.g. in the food industry and in detergents.

One particular lipase which has been found to be particularly advantageous for inclusion in a detergent for the removal of fatty stains or soiling from fabrics is a lipase produced by strains of Pseudomonas cepacia. In EP 214 761 (to Novo Industri A/S), this lipase is disclosed as a lipase which is active at a temperature below 60.degree. C., which is important as most present-day fabrics are washed at temperatures below 60.degree. C.

Another important Pseudomonas cepacia lipase for use as a detergent additive is the one disclosed in WO 89/01032 (to Novo Industri A/S) as a positionally non-specific lipase, i.e. one which is able to react with all three fatty acyl groups of a triglyceride.

In order to facilitate Pseudomonas cepacia lipase production, it may be advantageous to employ recombinant DNA techniques, for instance in order to optimize lipase expression by introducing a stronger promoter from which the DNA sequence encoding the enzyme is expressed or by introducing more efficient ribosome binding sites or signal peptide coding sequences, or in order to select a host organism for the production of the enzyme which is easier to cultivate (e.g. in terms of its being a standard production organism such as E. coli or the like) or which results in higher lipase yields.

However, as described below, such approaches will sometimes fail to yield the expected results, e.g. in cases where one or more genes in addition to the structural gene coding for the protein in question, play some part in the production of the gene product (examples of such genes are the Bacillus sac and iep genes, and genes required for the production of Klebsiella pullulanase and E. coli hemolysin).

The cloning of a lipase gene from another Pseudomonas species, Pseudomonas fragi, is known from, e.g., S. Aoyama et al., FEBS Letters, Vol. 242, No. 1, pp. 36-40 (1988) and Kugimiya et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm., Vol. 141, No. 1, pp. 185-90 (1986). However, the lipase produced by P.fragi differs from that of P. cepacia in its amino acid sequence, and in these publications, there is no indication that one or more additional genes may be required in order to achieve a significant lipase production in a host organism.

EP 331 376 discloses a recombinant DNA encoding a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase as well as a protein participating in the production of the lipase.

WO 90/00908 discloses the production of a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase in heterologous host cells by means of a polypeptide expressed in the host cell, which polypeptide acts as a modulator of lipase production.

It has surprisingly been found possible to increase the yield of an active lipase enzyme produced by a recombinant host cell when the lipase recovered from the cells is subjected to denaturation followed by renaturation in the presence of a chaperone molecule.

Accordingly, the present invention relates to a process for preparing an active lipase enzyme in vitro, the process comprising enzyme under suitable conditions to produce the lipase enzyme in inactive or partly active form, recovering the lipase enzyme from the culture, and subjecting the recovered lipase enzyme to denaturation, active lipase enzyme.

Alternatively, the invention relates to a process for preparing an active lipase enzyme in vitro, the process comprising enzyme under suitable conditions to produce the lipase enzyme in inactive or partly active form and recovering the lipase enzyme from the culture, renaturation to produce the active lipase enzyme.

In a further embodiment, the invention relates to a process for preparing an active lipase enzyme in vitro, the process comprising enzyme and with a DNA sequence encoding a chaperone molecule under suitable conditions to produce the lipase enzyme in inactive or partly active form and recovering a lipase enzyme chaperone molecule mixture from the culture, and renaturation to produce the active lipase enzyme, optionally with addition of a further amount of chaperone molecule to the mixture.

As indicated above, the present invention is based on the finding that the natural conformation of a protein or protein complex is not always only determined by the amino acid sequence of the protein. Thus, in some cases, accessory proteins, termed chaperone molecules, are required to mediate the formation of the correct tertiary structure of another protein or protein complex, but are not themselves components of the final functional structure (Ellis et al., Annual Review of Biochemistry, Vol. 60, pp. 321-47 (1991)).

In the present context, the term "chaperone molecule" is intended to indicate such accessory proteins, i.e. a protein involved in facilitating other polypeptides in maintaining the unfolded state, enabling their correct transmembrane targeting or folding and oligomeric assembly, and in disassembly of protein complexes (cf. Ellis et al., Trends Biochem. Sci., Vol. 14, pp. 339-42 (1989), Rothman, Cell, Vol. 59, pp. 591-601 (1989) and Morimoto et al., Stress Proteins in Biology and Medicine, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., pp. 1-36 (1990)). Although, in general, a covalent modification of the target protein or protein complex has not been observed by the action of a chaperone molecule it cannot be excluded that the chaperone molecule to be used in the processes of the invention is capable of causing such covalent modification. Accordingly, the term "chaperone molecule" as used herein is intended to include a chaperone molecule causing non-covalent as well as covalent modification of the lipase enzyme.

In another aspect, the present invention relates to a DNA construct comprising a first DNA sequence encoding a lipase enzyme fused to a second DNA sequence encoding a chaperone molecule in such a way that the lipase enzyme and chaperone molecule or functional part thereof are expressed as a single fusion protein on culturing a suitable host cell transformed with the DNA construct.

The chaperone molecule to be added to the recovered and optionally denaturated lipase enzyme in step b) above is advantageously produced by a process comprising culturing a host cell transformed with a DNA sequence encoding a chaperone molecule under suitable conditions to produce the chaperone molecule and recovering the chaperone molecule from the culture. Furthermore, when the chaperone molecule is to be added to a denaturated lipase enzyme it may be advantageous that the chaperone molecule itself is denaturated. Accordingly, the process of the invention may comprise a further step in which the chaperone molecule is subjected to a denaturation treatment before it is mixed with the denatured lipase enzyme in step b).

In the present context, "partly active form" as used about the lipase enzyme is intended to indicate that the lipase has some, but not full activity as determined by an activity measurement, e.g. by titration using a pH stat as later described. Less than full activity is taken to mean, that the partly active lipase preparation has a lower specific activity than a corresponding preparation of fully active lipase protein, the two preparations containing the same total amount of lipase protein.

The denaturation of the inactive or partly active lipase enzyme and optionally the chaperone molecule, which may be performed separately or on a mixture of the two components according to the processes of the invention may be carried out in a manner known per se. For instance, the denaturation may be obtained by subjecting the mixture to the action of a denaturating agent (e.g. 8M urea) and subsequently removing this agent, e.g. by dialysis.

Preferred lipases for production by the process of the invention are lipases derived from a Pseudomonas sp. or a Chromobacter sp. In particular, the lipase enzyme may be a Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae (e.g. as described in EP 407 225), Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Chromobacter viscosum lipase, or a derivative of said lipase enzyme. In particular, the lipase enzyme is one derived from a strain of Pseudomonas cepacia, e.g. a strain deposited in the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen in connection with the invention disclosed in EP 214 761, with the deposit numbers DSM 3333-3337 and DSM 3401, as well as the strain deposited in the Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen in connection with the invention disclosed in WO 89/01032, with the deposit number DSM 3959.

In the present context, the term "derivative" is intended to indicate a protein with lipolytic activity which is derived from the native lipase by suitably modifying the DNA sequence coding for the native lipase, resulting in the addition of one or more amino acids to either or both the C- and N-terminal end of the native protein, substitution of one or more amino acids at one or a number of different sites in the native amino acid sequence, deletion of one or more amino acids at either or both ends of the native protein or at one or more sites in the amino acid sequence, or insertion of one or more amino acids at one or more sites in the native amino acid sequence. Such modifications of DNA coding for native proteins are well known and widely practiced in the art. Typically, the amino acid sequence of the derivative will be homologous to that of the native lipase protein, e.g. exhibiting a substantial degree of homology, or the derivative will react with an antibody raised against the native lipase.

The host cell used in the process of the invention may be any suitable bacterium which, on cultivation, produces large amounts of the lipase. Examples of suitable bacteria may be grampositive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus lautus or Streptomyces lividans. It has been found that E. coli is able to produce a high yield, i.e. at least 5% of the total cellular protein, of (intracellular) lipase, and is therefore a preferred host organism. In E. coli, the lipase enzyme is typically produced in the form of inclusion bodies. The transformation of the bacteria may for instance be effected by protoplast transformation or by using competent cells in a manner known per se. Another suitable bacterial host cell is a cell of a Pseudomonas spp. such as Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Alternatively, the host cell may be a fungus, i.e. a cell of a yeast or of a filamentous fungus. The yeast host cell may, for instance, be a cell of the genus Saccharomyces such as S. cerevisiae. The filamentous fungus host organism may conveniently be one which has previously been used as a host for producing recombinant proteins, e.g. a strain of Aspergillus sp., such as A. niger, A. nidulans or A. oryzae. The techniques used to transform a fungal host cell and obtain expression of the recombinant protein may suitably be as described in EP 238 023.

For expression of the protein in the host cell the DNA sequence encoding the protein may be preceded by a promoter. The promoter may be any DNA sequence exhibiting a strong transcriptional activity in the host cell of choice and may be derived from a gene encoding an extracellular or intracellular protein such as an amylase, a glucoamylase, a protease, a lipase, a cellulase or a glycolytic enzyme.

Other sequences involved in expression of the protein include termination and polyadenylation sequences as well as ribosome binding sites and may suitably be derived from the same sources as the promoter.

In the process of the invention, the DNA sequence encoding the lipase enzyme and/or the chaperone molecule is advantageously preceded by the promoter of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, or Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P.sub.R or P.sub.L promoters, the phage T7 gene 10 promoter or the E. coli lac promoter. The DNA sequence encoding the lipase enzyme and/or the chaperone molecule may be preceded by a ribosome binding site of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, phage T7 gene 10 or E. coli lac gene.

According to the invention, the chaperone molecule is advantageously a Pseudomonas lipase modulator protein, preferably selected from the group consisting of the Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator (disclosed in WO 90/00908), the Pseudomonas glumae lipase modulator, and the Pseudomonas aeroginosa lipase modulator, or a derivative of any such lipase modulator.

In the present context, a derivative of a lipase modulator is to be understood in the same manner as indicated above in connection with derivatives of the lipase enzyme, i.e. a protein with chaperone activity which is derived from the native lipase by suitably modifying the DNA sequence coding for the native lipase modulator as discussed above. The chaperone activity of the derivative may, for instance, be determined by analyzing the capability of the derivative in producing an active lipase enzyme as explained herein.

In a preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention, the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase or a derivative thereof, and the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator (or a derivative thereof) (both disclosed in WO 90/00908).

The DNA construct of the invention comprising the DNA sequence encoding the lipase enzyme and/or the chaperone molecule may be of genomic or cDNA origin, for instance obtained by preparing a genomic or cDNA library of an appropriate organism, and screening for DNA sequences coding for all or part of the lipase or the chaperone by hybridization using synthetic oligonucleotide probes in accordance with standard techniques (cf. Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor (1989)).

The DNA construct of the invention may also be prepared synthetically by established standard methods, e.g. the phosphoamidite method described by Beaucage et al., Tetrahedron Letters, Vol. 22, pp. 1859-69 (1981) and Matthes et al., EMBO Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 801-05 (1984). According to the phosphoamidite method, oligonucleotides are synthesized, e.g. in an automatic DNA synthesizer, purified, ligated, and cloned in an appropriate vector.

Finally, the DNA construct may be of mixed synthetic and genomic, mixed synthetic and cDNA or mixed genomic and cDNA origin prepared by ligating fragments of synthetic, genomic or cDNA origin (as appropriate), the fragments corresponding to various parts of the entire DNA construct, in accordance with standard techniques.

In the DNA construct of the invention, the DNA sequence encoding the lipase enzyme may be one derived from a Pseudomonas sp. or a Chromobacter sp. For instance, the first DNA sequence may be one encoding a Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Chromobacter viscosum lipase, or a derivative of said lipase enzyme. The second DNA sequence may be one encoding a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator, a Pseudomonas glumae lipase modulator, a Pseudomonas aeroginosa lipase modulator, or another Pseudomonas lipase modulator protein or a derivative of any of these modulators. Most preferably, the first DNA sequence encodes a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase or a derivative thereof, and the second DNA sequence encodes a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator or a derivative thereof, as described in WO 90/00908 incorporated herein by reference.

A particularly preferred DNA construct is one which has the sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:5 appended hereto. The sequence may be modified in accordance with conventional practice. Examples of suitable modifications of the DNA sequence are nucleotide substitutions which do not give rise to another amino acid sequence of the lipase or lipase modulator, but which may correspond to the codon usage of the host organism into which the DNA construct is introduced or nucleotide substitutions which do give rise to a different amino acid sequence and therefore, possibly, a different polypeptide structure without, however, impairing the properties of either the lipase or the lipase modulator. Other examples of possible modifications are insertion of one or more nucleotides into the sequence, addition of one or more nucleotides at either end of the sequence and deletion of one or more nucleotides at either end of or within the sequence.

In a further aspect, the invention relates to a recombinant expression vector comprising a DNA construct as described above. The expression vector carrying the DNA sequence encoding the lipase and/or chaperone molecule may be any vector which is capable of replicating autonomously in a given host organism, typically a plasmid or bacteriophage. In the vector, the DNA sequence encoding the lipase and/or chaperone molecule should be operably connected to a suitable promoter sequence. The promoter may be any DNA sequence which shows transcriptional activity in the host cell and may be derived from genes encoding proteins either homologous or heterologous to the host organism. The promoter is preferably the promoter of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, or Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P.sub.R or P.sub.L promoters, the phage T7 gene 10 promoter or the E. coli lac promoter.

The vector may also comprise a selectable marker, e.g. a gene whose product confers antibiotic resistance, such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol or tetracycline resistance, or the dal genes from B.subtilis or B.licheniformis.

In a still further aspect, the present invention relates to a process for preparing a lipase in active form, the process comprising culturing a host cell transformed with the DNA construct described above under suitable conditions to produce the lipase, and recovering the lipase from the culture, optionally followed by denaturation and renaturation of the lipase/chaperone fusion protein.

The medium used to cultivate the cells may be any conventional medium suitable for growing bacteria. The lipase may be recovered from the medium by conventional procedures including separating the cells from the medium by centrifugation or filtration, if necessary after disruption of the cells to recover an intracellular product, precipitating the proteinaceous components of the supernatant or filtrate by means of a salt, e.g. ammonium sulphate, followed by purification by a variety of chromatographic procedures, e.g. ion exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography, or the like.

While the use of chaperone molecules in the preparation of active lipase enzyme is considered to be of particular importance in connection with recombinant DNA techniques (as explained above), it is believed that the presence of a chaperone molecule is critical in connection with any denaturation and renaturation treatment in which an active lipase enzyme, as described herein, is desired, irrespectively of the production method of the lipase enzyme. Thus, for instance in connection with a lipase enzyme produced by conventional fermentation of a naturally-occurring or non-genetically engineered organism, which is to be subjected to a denaturation treatment, it is believed that the presence of a chaperone molecule in the subsequent renaturation treatment is critical.

Accordingly, in a further general aspect the invention relates to a process for denaturating and renaturating a lipase enzyme, the process comprising chaperone molecule which has optionally been subjected to a denaturation treatment, and active lipase enzyme.

Alternatively, the denaturation/renaturation treatment of the lipase enzyme may be carried out by renaturation treatment with a chaperone molecule, and renaturation so as to produce an active lipase enzyme.

The present invention is described in the following with reference to the appended drawings, in which

FIG. 1 illustrates the plasmid pAHE2;

FIG. 2 illustrates the plasmid pAHE8;

FIG. 3 illustrates the plasmid pAHE10;

FIG. 4 illustrates the plasmid pCBE6;

FIG. 5 illustrates the plasmid pCBE7;

FIG. 6 illustrates the plasmid pCBE12;

FIG. 7 illustrates the plasmid pCBE18;

FIG. 8 illustrates the plasmid pCBE19;

FIG. 9 shows the result of a SDS-PAGE analysis of proteins expressed in E. coli JA221 performed as described in Example 3, in which lanes: A & S       molecular weight markers; 45, 36, 24 and 20 B           pJW2 (vector) C           pSJ150 (original lipase construct in pUC) D           pAHE2      30.degree. C. 1.0 hours(hr) E           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 1.0 hrs F           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 1.5 hrs G           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 2.0 hrs H, M, R     purified lipase from P. cepacia I           pAHE10     30.degree. C. 1.0 hrs J           pAHE10     42.degree. C. 1.0 hrs K           pAHE10     42.degree. C. 1.5 hrs L           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 2.0 hrs N           pCBE6      -IPTG     1.0 hrs O           pCBE6      +IPTG     1.0 hrs P           pCBE6      +IPTG     1.5 hrs Q           pCBE6      +IPTG     2.0 hrs ______________________________________

FIG. 10 shows the result of an immunoblot analysis performed as described in Example 3 using Lip antibody, in which lanes: ______________________________________ A           pJW2 (vector) B           pSJ150 C           pAHE2      30.degree. C. 1.0 hr D           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 1.0 hr E           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 1.5 hrs F           pAHE2      42.degree. C. 2.0 hrs G, L, Q, S  purified lipase from P. cepacia (1OLU) H           pAHE10     30.degree. C. 1.0 hr I           pAHE10     42.degree. C. 1.0 hr J           pAHE10     42.degree. C. 1.5 hrs K           pAHE10     42.degree. C. 2.0 hrs M           pCBE6      -IPTG     1.0 hr N           pCBE6      +IPTG     1.0 hr O           pCBE6      +IPTG     1.5 hrs P           pCBE6      +IPTG     2.0 hrs R           pAHE2 + pAHE10   42.degree. C., 1.5 hrs. ______________________________________

FIG. 11 illustrates the cellular localization of Lima in P. cepacia as determined by an immunoblot analysis of lipase (FIG. 11a) and Lim (FIG. 11b) induced with oleyl alcohol in intracellular (cytoplasm and inner cell membrane), periplasmic and extracellular fractions of P. cepacia (Example 7). Equal amounts of protein were loaded in each lane corresponding to 0.01, 17 and 21%, respectively. In (a) (Lipase immunoblot) the lanes contained: ______________________________________ A             purified lipase from P. cepacia B             intracellular fraction C             periplasmic fraction D             extracellular fraction, ______________________________________

in (b) (Lim immunoblot) the lanes contained: ______________________________________ A               lim expressed from pJ38 B               intracellular fraction C               periplasmic fraction D               extracellular fraction; ______________________________________

FIG. 9 illustrates the plasmid pAHE19;

FIG. 10 illustrates the plasmid pAHE22;

FIG. 11 illustrates the plasmid pAHE16;

FIG. 12 illustrates the plasmid pAHE23; and

FIG. 13 illustrates the plasmid pCBF1-6.

The present invention is further illustrated in the following examples which are not in any way intended to limit the scope of the invention as claimed.

Bacterial Strains (Gibson, 1984) E. coli BL21(DE3) B strain lysogen, placUV5-T7 RNApol (IPTG inducible) (Studier, 1990)

Plasmids (1991)) School (Studier, 1990).

General Methods

Standard DNA manipulations were performed essentially as described in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laborator Manual, Cold Spring Harbor (1989).

Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, DNA Polymerase I (Klenow fragment) were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim or Promega and used as recommended by the supplier.

Chicken egg white lysozyme was obtained from Sigma.

Preparation of plasmids and transformation of E. coli was carried out as described in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor (1989).

SDS-polyacrylamide gels were prepared, electrophoresed and stained as described in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor (1989).

Protein molecular weight markers were purchased from Sigma.

Lipase analysis

Lipase activity was detected on plates containing either glycerol tributyrate or an olive oil emulsion and brilliant green. Lipase activity was measured by a pH-stat method using glycerol tributyrate as substrate. 1 LU (lipase unit) is the amount of enzyme which liberates 1 .mu.mole titratable butyric acid per minute under the following conditions: J.Bacteriol., Vol. 173, pp. 559-67 (1991))

A lipase screening assay was performed in microtiter dishes according to the following procedure:

First an emulsification reagent is made up: 17.9 g NaCl+0.41 g KH.sub.2 PO.sub.4 +6.0 g Gum Arabic+540 ml glycerol is brought to a final volume of 1000 ml with demineralized water.

The lipase assay reagent is made up as follows: 12.5 ml of the above emulsification reagent+3.75 ml of glycerol tributyrate+0.25 ml Brilliant green (40 mg/ml in H.sub.2 O)+50 ml of 10 mM Tris pH 9.0 is emulsified for 1 min in an Ultra Turrax emulsifier.

The actual assay is performed by mixing 100 .mu.l of this assay reagent with 100 .mu.l of the lipase sample. The color development is compared to that of a known lipase sample.

The brilliant green plates consisted of 15 ml LB agar, with a top layer of 3 ml LB agar containing 0.3 ml of a 10% olive oil emulsion and 0.1 ml of a 40 mg/ml solution of brilliant green in distilled water. The olive oil emulsion was olive oil 10 ml+Gum Arabic 1 g+deionized water 90 ml, mixed using an Ultra Turrax emulsifier.

Induction of E. coli cultures for high level expression (a) pJW2 based plasmids

Overnight cultures were grown at 30.degree. C. in an orbital shaker at 250 rpm, diluted 1:100 and grown for 3-4 hrs at 30.degree. C. until an A600 of 0.5 was reached. One of a set of duplicate cultures was then shifted to 42.degree. C. for induction of protein synthesis. Samples from both cultures were taken at time=0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after induction.

(b) pET3a/pT7-7 based plasmids

Overnight cultures were grown at 37.degree. C. in an orbital shaker at 250 rpm, diluted 1:50 and grown at 37.degree. C. until an A600 of 0.5 was reached. IPTG was then added to a final concentration of 1.5 mM to one of a set of duplicate cultures. Rifampicin may also be added to the induced culture 15 min after IPTG addition to a final concentration of 100 .mu.g/ml. Samples from both cultures were taken at time=0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after induction.

Treatment and preparation of protein samples

Samples were immediately cooled to 0.degree. C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation in a microfuge at 12,000 g for 5 min at 4.degree. C. Cell pellets were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer and frozen at -20.degree. C. Proteins were precipitated from the supernatants by addition of an equal volume of acetone and leaving on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation for 15 min at 12,000 g at 4.degree. C. The precipitated proteins were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer and frozen at -20.degree. C.

Analysis of proteins by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Protein samples were boiled for 5 min prior to loading on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The gels were electrophoresed in Tris-glycine until the dye front reached the gel end and were then stained in 0.25% coomassie brilliant blue and destained in 10% acetic acid.

Western analysis

The method used was equivalent to that of Towbin et al. (1979). Protein samples were electrophoresed in 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose. Filters were preincubated with blocking buffer and then incubated with anti-lipase antibody. Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goatanti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) was then incubated with the filter. NitroBlue Tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-indolyl phosphate (both from Sigma) were used to visualize the proteins.

Method for Cell Lysis: adapted from Marston, In DNA Cloning: A practical approach (ed D.M. Glover), Vol. 3, p. 59. IRL Press, Oxford (1987)

Overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 into 100 mls LB medium and grown to an OD600 value of 0.5. Induction with heat in the case of pAHE2 and pAHE10 and IPTG in the case of pCBE6 was carried out for 2 hours. The cultures were then centrifuged at 500 g for 15 minutes at 4.degree. C. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was weighed. For each gram (wet weight) of E. coli cells, 3 ml of lysis buffer was added and the pellet was resuspended. Lysis Buffer contained 50 mM Tris. Cl, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl.

For each gram of cells, 8 ml of a 50 mM PMSF stock and 80 .mu.l of lysozyme (10 mg/ml) was added and stirred for 20 minutes. 4 mg of deoxycholic acid was added per gram of cells while stirring continuously. The lysate was placed at 37.degree. C. and stirred with a glass rod. When the lysate became viscous 20 .mu.l of DNAaseI (1 mg/ml) was added per gram of cells. The lysate was placed at room temperature until it was no longer viscous (approx 30 minutes). The cell lysate was then stored at 4.degree. C. until required.

Purification and washing of inclusion bodies: (Marston et al., BioTechnology, Vol. 2, p. 800 (1984))

The cell lysate was centrifuged at 12000 g for 15 minutes at 4.degree. C. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet was resuspended in 9 volumes of lysis buffer containing 0.5% Triton and 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.0). Storage at room temperature for 5 minutes was followed by centrifugation at 12000 g for 15 minutes at 4.degree. C. The supernatant was decanted and set aside and the pellet was resuspended in 100 .mu.l of H.sub.2 O. 10 .mu.l samples were removed from the supernatant and the resuspended pellet and were mixed with 10 .mu.l of 2.times.SDS gel loading buffer and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to determine if most of the protein of interest is in the pellet. The lipase screening assay was also carried out to determine if most of the lipase activity of pAHE2 was in the pellet fraction.

Solubilization of inclusion bodies and renaturation: (adapted from Marston et al., BioTechnology, Vol. 2, p. 800 (1984))

100 .mu.l of lysis buffer containing 0.1 mM PMSF (added fresh), 8M Urea (deionized), and 0.1M beta-mercaptoethanol was added to the washed pellet and stored for 1 hour at room temperature. The lipase activity screening assay was carried out in order to observe whether the lipase activity had disappeared due to the protein being totally denatured. 50 .mu.l of each of the denatured protein samples were placed in dialysis tubing. The protein samples were dialyzed in a buffer of 50 mM KH2PO4 (pH10.7), 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 50 mM NaCl and which also contained 8M urea and 0.1M BME. The pH was maintained at 10.7 with KOH. Initial dialysis in 8M urea was carried out overnight. Further dialyses using a lower concentration of urea (ie 6M; 4M; 2M; 0M) were carried out in the above buffer in the absence of BME. The pH in these dialysis reactions was maintained at 8.0 using HCl. Dialysis in each of the different concentrations of urea was allowed to take place for 6 hours. As a control experiment duplicate samples were dialyses exactly as above except in the absence of urea and BME.

The renatured samples were removed from the dialysis tubing and lipase activity of the samples was examined on glycerol tributyrate and brilliant green plates. The lipase activity was also examined using the microtiter lipase screening assay.

Recovery of proteins from SDS-polyacrylamide gels

The procedure for recovering proteins from SDS-polyacrylamide gels was described by Hager et al., Anal. Biochem., Vol. 109, pp. 76-86 (1980). Protein samples were electrophoresed on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, the gel was removed into a tray, rinsed with water and stained for 10 minutes with ice-cold 250 mM KCl and 1 mM DTT. The gel was destained in cold water containing 1 mM DTT and the protein band of interest was cut out. (A portion of the gel was stained with coomassie blue to stain molecular weight standards to ensure the correct band was cut out). The gel band was crushed through a 1 ml syringe with G18 needle and 1 ml of elution buffer containing 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.9), 0.1 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, and 200 mM NaCl, was added. The protein was allowed to elute for at least 1 hour at 25.degree. C. with occasional agitation. The mixture was centrifuged briefly to pellet the crumbled gel. The protein was precipitated from the supernatant by adding 4 volumes of cold acetone and incubating at -70.degree. C. for 20 min. The precipitated protein was centrifuged and the pellet was allowed to dry.

Generation of anti-LimA anti-sera in rabbits

In order to raise antibodies against LimA, three rabbits were injected with purified Lima protein according to a schedule similar to that described by Vaitukaitis, Methods in Enzymology Vol. 21, pp. 46-52 (1981). The LimA protein was purified from preparative SDS-polyacrylamide gels. On day 1, Lim in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2 was mixed with complete Freunds adjuvant and injected intradermally at 10 sites in the back of each rabbit. On day 21 a booster injection, mixed with incomplete Freunds adjuvant, was injected intramuscularly into the leg of each rabbit. An identical booster was injected in the same way on day 31 of the schedule. A test bleed revealed that anti-Lim antibodies had been generated.

Media

LB

Plates contained 2% agar.

(a) lipA+limA: pAHE2 and pAHE8

Plasmid pAHE2 (FIG. 1) was constructed by subcloning the 2.264 kb NsiI fragment encoding both lipA+limA from pSJ150 (J.o slashed.rgensen et al., J. Bacteriol., Vol. 173, pp. 559-67 (1991)) into NdeI-digested pJW2 (Wang et al., Vol. 18, p. 1070 (1990)). Ligations were transformed into E. coli TG1 at 30.degree. C. and plasmid DNA mini-preparations were used to identify plasmids with insert in the correct orientation. pAHE2 is one of a few correct constructs obtained. In pAHE2 the initiation codon of the lipase gene is immediately downstream from the phage T7 ribosome binding site.

E57 is E. coli strain JA221 transformed with pAHE2. When E57 is induced for high level protein production, lipase protein can be identified on SDS-polyacrylamide gels (and by western analysis) and lipase activity can be detected on brilliant green and glycerol tributyrate plates and by the microtiter assay and by pH-stat method.

Plasmid pAHE8 (FIG. 2) was constructed by subcloning the 2.264 kb NdeI fragment encoding lipa+limA from pAHE2 into the expression vector pET3a digested with NdeI. Ligations were transformed into E. coli strain TG1 and plasmid DNA was prepared from transformants to identify the correct plasmids.

E73 is E. coli strain BL21(DE3) pLysS transformed with pAHE8. When E73 is induced for high level protein production, lipase protein (approx. MW 34 kD) can be seen on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and lipase activity is detected on brilliant green and glycerol tributyrate plates and by the microtitre assay.

(b) lipA without limA: pAHE10

Plasmid pAHE10 (FIG. 3) is a derivative of pAHE2 from which 2/3rds of the coding region of the limA gene was deleted. Plasmid pAHE10 was constructed by digesting pAHE2 with the restriction enzymes ClaI and NotI, followed by treatment with Mung Bean Nuclease. DNA of the size 6.3 kb was excised as a band from an agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The DNA was purified using a Gene Clean kit, ligated and transformed into competent E. coli TG1. Plasmid DNA mini-preparations were used to identify the correct clones.

E68 is E. coli JA221 transformed with pAHE10. When E68 is induced for high level protein production, lipase protein, in comparable quantities to that from pAHE2, can be seen on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and by western analysis, but no lipase activity can be detected. and pCBE19

Plasmid pCBE6 (FIG. 4), from which limA alone is expressed, was constructed by subcloning the 1.17 kb ClaI-SphI fragment from pSJ150 as a blunt-ended fragment into the expression vector pET3a digested with NdeI and treated with Klenow to generate blunt ends. E. coli strain E102 is strain BL21 (DE3)pLysS transformed with pCBE6.

Plasmid pCBE7 (FIG. 5) was constructed by subcloning the same 1.2 kb ClaI-SphI fragment into the expression vector pT7-7. E103 is BL21(DE3) pLysS transformed with pCBE7. Upon induction of E102 and E103, a protein of molecular weight approx. 32 kD was observed.

Plasmid pCBE12 (FIG. 6) was constructed by subcloning the BglII-BamHI fragment of pCBE7 into pACYC177. Lim expressed from pCBE12 in trans to lipase expressed from pSJ518 (described in FIG. 3 of WO 90/00908) and pAHE10 gives rise to lipase activity.

Plasmids pCBE18 and 19 (FIGS. 7 and 8) were constructed by subcloning the BglII-BamHI fragment of pCBE7 into the BclI site of pLysS. Lim expressed from pCBE18 and 19 in trans to lipase from pAHE10 gives rise to lipase activity.

Cultures were induced to produce high levels of both LipA and Lima as follows. E. coli strains E57 (JA221/pAHE2) and E68 (JA221/pAHE10) were grown overnight at 30.degree. C. at 250 rpm. The cultures were diluted 1:100 and grown at 30.degree. C. at 250 rpm until the A600 was 0.5. The cultures were then shifted to grow at 42.degree. C. E. coli strain E102 (BL21(DE3)pLysS/pCBE6) was grown overnight at 37.degree. C., diluted 1:100 and grown until A600 was 0.5. IPTG was then added to the culture to a final concentration of 1.5 mM. Fifteen minutes later rifampicin was added to a final concentration of 100 .mu.g/ml. The culture was incubated at 37.degree. C. and shaken at 250 rpm throughout the growth. Samples were taken from each culture at 60, 90 and 120 minutes after induction.

Samples were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and by western analysis using anti-serum raised against lipase. Lipase protein was observed to be induced in strains containing either pAHE2 or pAHE10, in equivalent amounts. The lipase for the majority about 95% is larger than the mature lipase isolated from Pseudomonas cepacia and the size is consistent with that expected for the complete prelipase. Samples were also assayed for lipase activity by the microtitre assay. Lipase activity was observed from cultures of E57 (pAHE2, lipA+limA), but none was observed from cultures of E68 (pAHE10, lipA only) or E102 (pCBE6, limA).

The results demonstrate that lipase protein is made in equivalent amounts in the presence and in the absence of the limA gene, but no lipase activity is detected in the absence of limA. Active lipase is only produced when the limA gens is also present.

Overnight cultures of JA221/pAHE2; JA221/pAHE10; BL21/pLysS/pCBE6 and BL21 were diluted 1:100 into 100 mls LB medium and grown to an OD600 value of 0.5. Induction with heat in the case of pAHE2 and pAHE10 and IPTG in the case of pCBE6 was carried out for 2 hours. The cultures were then centrifuged at 500 g for 15 minutes at 4.degree. C.

Cells were lysed by the method described. The Lim protein was found to be in the soluble fraction of the cell lysate. The lipase was found to reside in inclusion bodies. Inclusion bodies were prepared by a method adapted from Marston et al., BioTechnology, Vol. 2, p. 800 (1984). Pure lipase and Lim proteins were prepared after SDS-PAGE of inclusion bodies and soluble lysate fractions, respectively, by a method described by Hager et al., Anal. Biochem., Vol. 109, pp. 76-86 (1980). Samples were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in transfer buffer (10 mM CAPS, 10% methanol, pH 11) for 20 min. The gel was electroblotted onto Problott which had been pretreated in 100% methanol (5-10 sec) and distilled water (2.times.1 min) and then soaked in transfer buffer. Electroblotting was carried out at 200 mA for 3 hours in transfer buffer at room temperature. The blot was removed from the sandwich, rinsed in distilled water and then in methanol (5-10 sec). The blot was then stained in Amido Black (0.1% w/v) in 1% (v/v) acetic acid, 40% (v/v) methanol for 1 min. The blot was rinsed in frequent changes of distilled water, air dried and stored at -20.degree. C. between layers of filter paper. The bands corresponding to LimA and prelipase were excised and sequenced directly on an Applied Biosystems 477A protein sequencer.

The following sequences were obtained:

Except for the fact that the N-terminal methionine has been cleaved off, the sequences are as expected for LimA and for preLipA as deduced from the DNA sequence.

Gel-purified LimA protein was used to raise polyclonal antibodies as described in the methods section.

The purity of the proteins was checked by further SDS-PAGE analysis.

Denaturation/renaturation experiments were carried out with LipA from either pAHE2 or pAHE10 (present in inclusion bodies) together with LimA (pCBE6 and present in the cell lysate). 60 .mu.l of inclusion bodies was mixed with varying volumes of pCBE6 cell lysate (0-30 .mu.l) and solubilized together in 8M urea. Renaturation was carried out by dialysis against decreasing concentrations of urea. Experiments were carried out in the presence and absence of 5% glycerol. The lipase activity was measured using the pH stat.

The results of this experiment (shown below) indicate that increasing percentages of lipase activity may be recovered by denaturing/renaturing in the presence of increasing quantities of LimA, and that the presence of glycerol does not affect the recovery of lipase activity.

Results for pAHE2 and pAHE10 LipA

Inclusion bodies undiluted; LimA from lysate

Initial lipase activity measured for pAHE2(pJW2::lipA/limA)=7.5 LU (volume 60 .mu.l)

Initial lipase activity measured for pAHE10(pJW2::lipA)=0 LU Denaturation and renaturation No of LU   No of LU No of LU  recovered  recovered Sample       denatured (-Glycerol) (+Glycerol) ______________________________________ pAHE2 + 0 .mu.l LimA 7.5       5.3        5.3 pAHE2 + 10 .mu.l LimA 7.5       9.3        8.3 pAHE2 + 20 .mu.l LimA 7.5       12.3       9.0 pAHE2 + 30 #1 LimA 7.5       13.2       13.5 pAHE2 + non-LimA 7.5       5.0        nd. lysate, 30 .mu.l pAHE10 + 0 .mu.l LimA 0.0       0.0        0.0 pAHE10 + 10 .mu.l LimA 0.0       6.5        10.5 pAHE10 + 20 .mu.l LimA 0.0       8.3        8.5 pAHE10 + 30 .mu.l LimA 0.0       16.0       11.0 pAHE10 + non-LimA 0.0       0.0        nd. lysate, 30 .mu.l ______________________________________

For this set of experiments the inclusion body fractions were diluted 1:10. Samples of pAHE2 and pAHE10 (Lip) inclusion bodies and pCBE6 (Lim) cell lysate were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The Biorad protein assay was used to quantify the amount of proteins used in the denaturation/renaturation experiments. 10 .mu.l of pAHE2 inclusion bodies was determined to contain 10 .mu.g of protein; 10 .mu.l of pAHE10 inclusion bodies to contain 8 .mu.g of protein; and 10 .mu.l of pCBE6 lysate to contain 25 .mu.g total protein.

The results of this experiment (shown below) indicate that increasing the quantity of LimA in denaturation/renaturation reactions results in initially increasing recoveries of lipase activity. Addition of further quantities of LimA to the reactions is inhibitory. Results for pAHE2 and pAHE10 Lipases Inclusion bodies diluted 1:10; LimA from lysate Sample dialyses  No of lipase units recovered ______________________________________ pAHE2 10 .mu.l   0.4 pAHE2 10 .mu.l + 10 .mu.l LimA 5.6 pAHE2 10 .mu.l + 15 u.mu. LimA 5.7 pAHE2 10 .mu.l + 20 .mu.l LimA 4.5 pAHE2 10 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l LimA 9.5 pAHE2 10 .mu.l + 40 .mu.l LimA 3.2 pAHE10 10 .mu.l  0.0 pAHE10 10 .mu.l + 10 .mu.l LimA 2.5 pAHE10 10 .mu.l + 15 .mu.l LimA 7.8 pAHE10 10 .mu.l + 20 .mu.l LimA 7.3 pAHE10 10 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l LimA 3.5 pAHE10 10 .mu.l + 40 .mu.l LimA 0.5 ______________________________________

P. cepacia DSM 3959 (the strain from which lipA and limA were cloned) was induced to produce lipase by growth in LB media supplemented with 80 g/l oleyl alcohol, and extracellular, periplasmic and intracellular fractions were isolated as described by Neu et al., J.Biol. Chem., Vol. 240, pp. 3685-92 (1965).

Immunoblots (FIG. 11) and lipase activity analysis showed that the extracellular fraction contained only active, mature lipase, whereas the intracellular fraction contained only inactive prelipase. protein % Fraction  lipase activity prelipase lipase ______________________________________ Intracellular -              100      nd Extracellular +              nd       100 ______________________________________

When LimA was provided as an extract of E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS pCBE6, mature, extracellular lipase form P. cepacia could be reactivated quantitatively after denaturation/renaturation only in the presence of LimA. No lipase activity was observed when intracellular prelipase was used in a similar experiment with or without LimA, as is apparent from the following table: Cell fraction of   LU prior to LU after P. cepacia         denaturation renatuation ______________________________________ Intracellular fraction (prelipase) 20 .mu.l + 0 .mu.l LimA 0.0        0.0 20 .mu.l + 10 .mu.l LimA 0.0        0.0 20 .mu.l + 20 .mu.l LimA 0.0        0.0 20 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l LimA 0.0        0.0 20 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l non-LimA lysate 0.0        0.0 Extracellular fraction (mature lipase) 20 .mu.l + 0 .mu.l LimA 1.5        0.0 20 .mu.l + 10 .mu.l LimA 1.5        0.4 20 .mu.l + 20 .mu.l LimA 1.5        0.8 20 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l LimA 1.5        1.3 20 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l non-LimA lysate 1.5        0.0 ______________________________________

The activation of lipase but not prelipase from P. cepacia by LimA during renaturation experiments is consistent with the results using lipase proteins produced in E. coli . The E. coli lipase samples are composed of approximately 5% mature lipase and 95% prelipase. The amount of lipase activity observed before denaturation (pAHE2 only) and after renaturation (pAHE2 and pAHE10) is equivalent to approximately 5% of that expected from the total amount of lipase protein seen on SDS-PAGE.

Plasmids from which the lipase LipA was expressed in a form lacking the signal peptide, i.e. as mature lipase, were constructed. These are pAHE19 (FIG. 9), which contains a modified version of the lipA gene encoding the mature lipase followed by the limA gene, and pAHE22 (FIG. 10), which encodes the mature lipase without limA. They were constructed as follows:

The following DNA fragment was synthesized (standard methods): ##STR1##

This DNA fragment basically contains the Bacillus licheniformis amyL ribosome binding site and start codon located in front of the sequence encoding the amino acids AAGYAA (SEQ ID NO:11) from the N-terminal of the mature LipA protein.

This DNA fragment was ligated into MluI digested pSJ420 (identical to pSJ416 described in WO 90/00908, and pSJ838 was isolated as a plasmid in which the HindIII site in the synthetic DNA fragment was located proximal to the amyL promoter on pSJ420.

pSJ838 carries the amyL promoter, amyL RBS, the amyL signal peptide fused to the first 6 codons of lipA, amyL RBS, mature lipA, and limA.

By in vivo recombination from pSJ838 (essentially as described in J.o slashed.rgensen et al., Gene, Vol. 96, pp. 37-41 (1990)) plasmid pSJ897 was obtained, which contains the amyL promoter, amyL RBS, and mature lipA followed by limA. Immediately upstream from the amyL RBS on pSJ897 is the recognition sequence for restriction enzyme NdeI.

pAHE19 was constructed by ligation of the 4.9 kb NdeI-EcoRI fragment of pJW2, the 0.46 kb NdeI-BamHI fragment of pSJ897, and the 2.07 kb BamHI-EcoRI fragment of pSJ150.

pAHE22 was constructed from pAHE19 by ClaI+NotI digestion and ligation following exonuclease S1 treatment to make ends blunt.

Upon induction, lipase activity was observed from E. coli JA221 containing pAHE19, but not from E. coli JA221 containing pAHE22.

Mature lipase was provided as the soluble fraction following induction, harvest, and lysis of cells as described in methods, and was used in a denaturation/renaturation experiment in the presence and absence of a LimA containing cell lysate, as described in methods.

The results of this experiment (table below) shows that mature LipA produced in E. coli only in the presence of LimA can be renatured to give active lipase enzyme.

pAHE19: mature LipA, LimA.

pAHE22: mature LipA. LU before LU after denaturation renaturation ______________________________________ pAHE19 (100 .mu.l) 0.5        0.5 pAHE19 (100 .mu.l) + LimA (10 .mu.l) 0.5        0.5 pAHE19 (100 .mu.l) + LimA (20 .mu.l) 0.5        0.75 pAHE19 (100 .mu.l) + LimA (30 .mu.l) 0.5        0.75 pAHE19 (100 .mu.l) + non-LimA lysate 0.5        0.25 (30 .mu.l) pAHE22 (100 .mu.l) 0.0        0.0 pAHE22 (100 .mu.l) + LimA (10 .mu.l) 0.0        0.5 pAHE22 (100 .mu.l) + LimA (20 .mu.l) 0.0        0.75 pAHE22 (100 .mu.l) + LimA (30 .mu.l) 0.0        0.75 pAHE22 (100 .mu.l) + non-LimA lysate 0.0        0.0 (30 .mu.l) ______________________________________

Another isolate of P. cepacia, DSM 3401 also called strain 75-10A, produce a lipase with similarity to LipA from DSM 3959.

Cloning and sequencing of the lipase encoding DNA from DSM 3401 (using standard methods as described in WO 90/00908) revealed two genes, hereafter referred to as lipD and limD with a relatively high homology to lipA and limA.

Due to the extreme GC content of the DNA, the sequence was difficult to determine, and there still remains some undetermined basepairs--at 4 positions in the lipD gens, and at two positions in the limD gene.

The limD start codon is positioned three basepairs downstream from the lipD stop codon, as is the case for lipA and limA.

The DNA sequence encoding lipD is given in SEQ ID NO:1, and the corresponding protein sequence in SEQ ID NO:3. The DNA sequence encoding limD is given in SEQ ID NO:2, and the corresponding protein sequence in SEQ ID NO:4.

From an alignment study of the amino acid sequences of LipA and LipD it appeared that there are 22 differences in the mature part of the enzyme, in addition to 5 positions where the LipD amino acid sequence could not be deduced.

From an alignment study of the amino acid sequences of LimA and LimD it appeared that there are 32 differences, in addition to 2 positions where the LimD amino acid sequence could not be deduced.

Based on these studies it is clear that LipD and LipA as well as LimD and LimA are homologous, but still different lipase and lipase modulator proteins.

It was therefore of interest to see if LimA could activate LipD in a denaturation/renaturation experiment.

LipD from strain 7510-A (=DSM3401) was provided as a partially purified protein from DSM3401, using standard protein purification methods.

Denaturation/renaturation experiments were carried out using the lipase from strain 7510-A in the presence and absence of LimA. 18 LU were denatured and renatured with varying ratios of LimA and the recovered lipase activity was measured. LipAse activity was measured on the pH-stat. As control, the experiments were also carried out in the absence of urea.

The results obtained show that when the 7510-A lipase was denatured and renatured in the absence of LimA effectively no lipase activity was recovered. When increasing levels of LimA were added to the 7510-A lipase increasing levels of lipase activity were observed. However, the percentages of lipase activity recovered were still very low. Results for 7510-A lipase 13,000 LU/ml stock used; LimA from lysate No of LU No of LU  recovered Sample dialyzed denatured (+UREA)   % recovery ______________________________________ 7510A 15 .mu.l 18        0.25      1.4 7510A 15 .mu.l + 5 .mu.l LimA 18        0.25      1.4 7510A 15 .mu.l + 10 .mu.l LimA 18        0.4       2.2 7510A 15 .mu.l + 15 .mu.l LimA 18        0.35      2.0 7510A 15 .mu.l + 30 .mu.l LimA 18        0.45      2.5 ______________________________________

An explanation for the low recovery of lipase activity was later found. It turned out that the lipase in this particular preparation was degraded during denaturation/renaturation, so the experiment was repeated with a new, partly purified preparation of lipase from DSM3401 and LimA from induced BL21(DE3) pLysS pCBE6. The following results show that LimA is well able to activate LipD. LU before LU after  % denaturation renaturation recovery ______________________________________ LipD (10 .mu.l) + 80         0.1       0.08 LipD (10 .mu.l) + 5 .mu.l LimA 80         44        35 LipD (10 .mu.l) + 10 .mu.l LimA 80         45        36 LipD (10 .mu.l) + 20 .mu.l LimA 80         56        45 LipD (10 .mu.l) + 30 .mu.l LimA 80         55        44 LipD (10 .mu.l) + 40 .mu.l LimA 80         53        42 ______________________________________

The lipA sequence contains a MluI site at a position corresponding to 7 amino acids into the mature LipA sequence and a ClaI site following the lipA stop codon.

The lipD sequence contains MluI and ClaI sites at the equivalent positions.

Therefore, plasmids could easily be constructed based on the former lipA expression vectors by insertion of the lipD MluI-ClaI fragment in stead of the lipA MluI-ClaI fragment to allow expression of a hybrid protein, in which only the first 7 amino acids in the mature protein are from LipA, whereas the rest of the mature protein is from LipD.

pAHE16 (FIG. 11) expresses the LipA-LipD hybrid lipase together with LimA, and was constructed from pAHE2 by replacement of the MluI-ClaI fragment as described above. pAHE23 (FIG. 12) expresses only the LipA-LipD hybrid lipase, and no Lim protein. It was constructed from pAHE16 by deletion of the ClaI-NotI fragment of LimA.

The LipA-LipD hybrid protein expressed from pAHE16 and pAHE23 was used in a denaturation/renaturation experiment with and without LimA added as described in methods.

The lipase sample used in this experiment was the soluble fraction following lysis of the induced E. coli JA221 cells containing either pAHE16 or pAHE23 (although the vast majority of the lipase protein upon induction resides in inclusion bodies, the soluble fraction still contains some lipase, and there seem to be relatively more mature lipase in the soluble fraction than in the inclusion bodies).

LimA was obtained from an induced culture of BL21(DE3) pLysS pCBE6.

The results presented below show that LimA is able to activate the LipA-LipD hybrid lipase in a denaturation/renaturation experiment. LU before LU after denaturation renaturation ______________________________________ pAHE16 (30 .mu.l) + 0.5        0.5 pAHE16 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (10 .mu.l) 0.5        0.75 pAHE16 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (20 .mu.l) 0.5        0.75 pAHE16 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (30 .mu.l) 0.5        0.75 pAHE16 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (40 .mu.l) 0.5        1.0 pAHE16 (30 .mu.l) + non-LimA cell lysate 0.5        0.5 (40 .mu.l) pAHE23 (30 .mu.l) + 0.0        0.0 pAHE23 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (10 .mu.l) 0.0        0.75 pAHE23 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (20 .mu.l) 0.0        0.75 pAHE23 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (30 .mu.l) 0.0        1.0 pAHE23 (30 .mu.l) + LimA (40 .mu.l) 0.0        1.0 pAHE23 (30 .mu.l) + non-LimA cell lysate 0.0        0.0 (40 .mu.l) ______________________________________

Plasmid pSJ721 is a deletion derivative of pSJ377 in which 15 bp have been deleted at the ClaI site, deleting the lipA stop codon, and the codons for the first three amino acids of lim (J.o slashed.rgensen et al., J.Bacteriol., Vol. 173, pp. 559-67 (1991)). pSJ721 thus encodes a Lim protein which is fused to the eight amino acids following the SphI site at the C-terminal of lipA. The 838 bp SphI-NotI fragment of pSJ721 (which includes the C-terminal of lip fused to most of lim) and the 915 bp MluI-SphI fragment of pSJ150 (which includes most of the lipase coding sequence) were ligated with pAHE8 digested with MluI and NotI, such that a lip-lim fusion plasmid was generated. Transformants were screened for loss of the ClaI site which is normally present at the beginning of the limA gene and which is absent in pSJ721, and should be absent in lip-lim fusion plasmids. A number of plasmids were deemed to be correct from restriction enzyme analysis. Six of these were named pCBF1-6 (FIG. 13).

E. coli BL21(DE3) pLysS was transformed with each of the fusion plasmids and transformants were grown and induced with IPTG. Plating on tributyrine plates and analysis of activity in broth samples revealed that these plasmids gave rise to lipase activity upon induction. Protein samples from both cells and broth were analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and by western analysis using anti-lipase anti-serum. Only a lipase protein identical in size to the unprocessed lipase produced by pAHE2 or pAHE8 was detected. No proteins of the higher molecular weight expected were observed, even in samples taken early in time course induction experiments. Perhaps the artificial lip-lim fusion is particularly susceptible to proteolytic cleavage at the junction of the proteins.

In the Sequence Listing below prelipase, the first amino acid residue of the mature lipase is A (amino acid residue 45). 8. SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION: (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 11 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:1: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1092 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM 3401 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:1: ATGGCCAGATCGATGCGTTCCAGGGTGGTGGCAGGGGCAGTGGCATGCGCGATGAGCGTC60 GCGCCGTTCGCGGGGGCGACCGCGGTGATGACGCTTGCGACGACGCACGCGGCGATGGCG120 GCGACCGCGCCCGCCGACGACTACGCGACGACGCGTTATCCGATCATCCTCGTGCACGGG180 CTCACGGGTACCGACAAGTACGCGGGCGTGCTCGAGTACTGGTACGGCATCCAGGAAGAC240 CTGCAGCAGCATGGCGCGACCGTCTACGTCGCGAACCTGTCGGGCTTCCAGAGCGACGAC300 GGGCCGAACGGGCGCGGCGAACAGTTGCTCGCGTACGTGAAGACGGTGCTCGCGGCGACG360 GGCGCGACCAAGGTCAATCTCGTCGGCCACNCGCAGGGCGGGCTCACGTCGCGTTACGTT420 GCGGCTGTCGCGCCCGATCTCGTCGCGTCGGTGACGACGATCGGCACGCCGCATCGTGCN480 NCCGAGTTCGCCGACTTCGTGCAGGGCGTGCTCGCATACGATCCGACCGGGCTTTCGTCA540 TCGGTGATCGCGGCGTTCGTCAATGTGTTCGGAATCCTGACGAGCAGCAGCCACAACACG600 AACCAGGACGCACTCGCGTCGCTGAAGACGCTGACGACCGCCCAGGCCGCCGCGTACAAC660 CAGAACTATCCGAGCGCGGGCCTCGGTGCGCCGGGCAGTTGCCAGACCGGCNNNCCGACG720 GAAACCGTGCGGTNCAACACGCATCTGCTGTATTCGTGGGCCGGCACGGCGATCCAGCCG780 ACGCTCTCCGTGTTCGGTGTCACGGGCGCGACGGACACGAGCACCATTCCGCTCGTCGAT840 CCGGCGAACGCGCTCGACCCGTCGACGCTTGCGCTGTTCGGCACGGGCACGGTGATGATC900 AACCGCGGCTCGGGCCCGAACGACGGGCTCGTATCGAAGTGCAGCGCGCTGTACGGCCAG960 GTGCTGAGCACGAGCTACAAGTGGAACCATATCGACGAGATCAACCAGTTGCTCGGCGTG1020 CGCGGCGCGAATGCGGAAGATCCCGTCGCGGTGATCCGCACGCATGCGAACCGGCTGAAG1080 CTGGCGGGCGTG1092 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1032 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM 3401 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2: ATGGCGGCACGTGAAGGGCGCGCGCCGCTGGCGCGGCGCGCTGCAGTCTACGGTGTCGTG60 GGGCTGGCGGCGATCGCCGGCGTCGCGATGTGGAGCGGGGCGGGATGGCATCGCGGTACG120 GGTAGCGTCGGCGAAGCGCCCGATGCGGCGGCAGTGGGCGGCGTGGCTGCGGCACCGCCG180 CAGGCGGCCGTGCCGGCGAGCGCGGGCCTGCCGTCGTCGCTGGCCGGCTCCAGCGCGCCG240 CGCGTGCCGCTCGATGCGGGCGGCCATCTCGCGAAGGTGCGCGCGGTGCGCGATTTCTTC300 GACTACTGCCTGACCGCGCAGAGCGACCTCAGTGCGGCCGCGCTCGATGCACTCGTCGTG360 CGCGAGATTGCCGCGCAGCTCGACGGCACGGCGGCGCAGGCCGAGGCGCTCGACGTGTGG420 CATCGCTATCGTGCGTATCTCGACGCGCTCGCGAAACTGCGCGATGCCGGCGCGGTCGAC480 AAGTCCGACCTGGGCGCGCTGCAGCTCGCGCTCGACCAGCGCGCATCGATCGCGTATCGC540 ACGCTCGGCGACTGGAGCCAGCCGTTCTTCGGCGCGGAGCAGTGGCGGCAGCGCTACGAT600 CTCGCGCGGCTGAAGATCGCGCAGGATCGCACGCTGACCGATGCGCAGAAGGCCGAACGG660 CTCGCGGCGCTGCAGCAACAGATGCCGGCCGACGAACGCGCGGCTCAGCAGGCGGTCGAC720 CGGCAGCGGGCCGCGATCGACCAGAGTCCGNAGTTGCAGAAGAGCGGGACGACGCCCGAT780 GCGATGCGCGCGCAACTGACGCAGACGCTCGGGCCCGAGGCCGCCGCGCGCGTCGGCCAG840 ATGCAGCAGGACGACGCATCGTGGCAGAGNCGCTACGCGGACTATGCGGCGCAGCGCGCG900 CAGATCGAGTCGGCCGGCCTGTCGCCGCAGGGCCGCGACGCGCAGATCGCCGCACTGCGG960 CAGCGCGTGTTCACGAAGCCCGGCGAAGCCGTGCGCGCGGCGTCGCTCGATCGCGGGGCG1020 GGCAGCGCGCAG1032 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 364 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM 3401 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3: MetAlaArgSerMetArgSerArgValValAlaGlyAlaValAlaCys 151015 AlaMetSerValAlaProPheAlaGlyAlaThrAlaValMetThrLeu 202530 AlaThrThrHisAlaAlaMetAlaAlaThrAlaProAlaAspAspTyr 354045 AlaThrThrArgTyrProIleIleLeuValHisGlyLeuThrGlyThr 505560 AspLysTyrAlaGlyValLeuGluTyrTrpTyrGlyIleGlnGluAsp 65707580 LeuGlnGlnHisGlyAlaThrValTyrValAlaAsnLeuSerGlyPhe 859095 GlnSerAspAspGlyProAsnGlyArgGlyGluGlnLeuLeuAlaTyr 100105110 ValLysThrValLeuAlaAlaThrGlyAlaThrLysValAsnLeuVal 115120125 GlyHisXaaGlnGlyGlyLeuThrSerArgTyrValAlaAlaValAla 130135140 ProAspLeuValAlaSerValThrThrIleGlyThrProHisArgXaa 145150155160 XaaGluPheAlaAspPheValGlnGlyValLeuAlaTyrAspProThr 165170175 GlyLeuSerSerSerValIleAlaAlaPheValAsnValPheGlyIle 180185190 LeuThrSerSerSerHisAsnThrAsnGlnAspAlaLeuAlaSerLeu 195200205 LysThrLeuThrThrAlaGlnAlaAlaAlaTyrAsnGlnAsnTyrPro 210215220 SerAlaGlyLeuGlyAlaProGlySerCysGlnThrGlyXaaProThr 225230235240 GluThrValArgXaaAsnThrHisLeuLeuTyrSerTrpAlaGlyThr 245250255 AlaIleGlnProThrLeuSerValPheGlyValThrGlyAlaThrAsp 260265270 ThrSerThrIleProLeuValAspProAlaAsnAlaLeuAspProSer 275280285 ThrLeuAlaLeuPheGlyThrGlyThrValMetIleAsnArgGlySer 290295300 GlyProAsnAspGlyLeuValSerLysCysSerAlaLeuTyrGlyGln 305310315320 ValLeuSerThrSerTyrLysTrpAsnHisIleAspGluIleAsnGln 325330335 LeuLeuGlyValArgGlyAlaAsnAlaGluAspProValAlaValIle 340345350 ArgThrHisAlaAsnArgLeuLysLeuAlaGlyVal 355360 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 344 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM 3401 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4: MetAlaAlaArgGluGlyArgAlaProLeuAlaArgArgAlaAlaVal 151015 TyrGlyValValGlyLeuAlaAlaIleAlaGlyValAlaMetTrpSer 202530 GlyAlaGlyTrpHisArgGlyThrGlySerValGlyGluAlaProAsp 354045 AlaAlaAlaValGlyGlyValAlaAlaAlaProProGlnAlaAlaVal 505560 ProAlaSerAlaGlyLeuProSerSerLeuAlaGlySerSerAlaPro 65707580 ArgValProLeuAspAlaGlyGlyHisLeuAlaLysValArgAlaVal 859095 ArgAspPhePheAspTyrCysLeuThrAlaGlnSerAspLeuSerAla 100105110 AlaAlaLeuAspAlaLeuValValArgGluIleAlaAlaGlnLeuAsp 115120125 GlyThrAlaAlaGlnAlaGluAlaLeuAspValTrpHisArgTyrArg 130135140 AlaTyrLeuAspAlaLeuAlaLysLeuArgAspAlaGlyAlaValAsp 145150155160 LysSerAspLeuGlyAlaLeuGlnLeuAlaLeuAspGlnArgAlaSer 165170175 IleAlaTyrArgThrLeuGlyAspTrpSerGlnProPhePheGlyAla 180185190 GluGlnTrpArgGlnArgTyrAspLeuAlaArgLeuLysIleAlaGln 195200205 AspArgThrLeuThrAspAlaGlnLysAlaGluArgLeuAlaAlaLeu 210215220 GlnGlnGlnMetProAlaAspGluArgAlaAlaGlnGlnAlaValAsp 225230235240 ArgGlnArgAlaAlaIleAspGlnSerProXaaLeuGlnLysSerGly 245250255 ThrThrProAspAlaMetArgAlaGlnLeuThrGlnThrLeuGlyPro 260265270 GluAlaAlaAlaArgValGlyGlnMetGlnGlnAspAspAlaSerTrp 275280285 GlnXaaArgTyrAlaAspTyrAlaAlaGlnArgAlaGlnIleGluSer 290295300 AlaGlyLeuSerProGlnGlyArgAspAlaGlnIleAlaAlaLeuArg 305310315320 GlnArgValPheThrLysProGlyGluAlaValArgAlaAlaSerLeu 325330335 AspArgGlyAlaGlySerAlaGln 340 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 2118 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5: ATGGCCAGGACGATGCGTTCCAGGGTGGTGGCAGGGGCAGTGGCATGCGCGATGAGCATC60 GCGCCGTTCGCGGGGACGACCGCGGTGATGACGCTCGCGACGACGCACGCGGCAATGGCG120 GCCACCGCGCCCGCCGCTGGCTACGCGGCGACGCGTTACCCGATCATCCTCGTGCACGGG180 CTCTCGGGTACCGACAAGTACGCCGGCGTGCTCGAGTATTGGTACGGCATCCAGGAGGAC240 CTGCAACAGAACGGTGCGACCGTCTACGTCGCGAACCTGTCGGGTTTCCAGAGCGACGAC300 GGCCCGAACGGGCGCGGCGAACAGTTGCTCGCTTACGTGAAGACGGTGCTCGCGGCGACG360 GGGGCGACCAAGGTCAATCTCGTCGGTCACAGCCAGGGCGGCCTCTCGTCGCGCTATGTT420 GCTGCCGTCGCGCCCGATCTCGTTGCGTCGGTGACGACGATCGGCCCAGCCGATCGCGGC480 TCCGAATTCGCCGACTTCGTGCAGGACGTGCTCGCGTACGATCCGACCGGGCTTTCGTCA540 TCGGTGATCGCCGCGTTCGTCAATGTGTTCGGGATCCTGACGAGCAGCAGCCACAACACC600 AACCAGGACGCGCTCGCCGCACTGCAGACGCTGACCACCGCACGGGCCGCCACGTACAAC660 CAGAACTATCCGAGCGCGGGCCTGGGTGCGCCGGGCAGTTGCCAGACCGGTGCGCCGACC720 GAAACCGTCGGCGGCAACACGCACCTGCTGTATTCGTGGGCCGGCACGGCGATCCAGCCG780 ACGCTCTCCGTGTTCGGCGTCACGGGCGCGACGGACACGAGCACCCTTCCGCTCGTCGAT840 CCGGCGAACGTGCTCGACCTGTCGACGCTCGCGCTGTTCGGCACCGGCACGGTGATGATC900 AACCGCGGCTCCGGGCAGAACGACGGGCTCGTGTCGAAGTGCAGTGCGCTGTACGGCAAG960 GTGCTGAGCACGAGCTACAAGTGGAACCACCTCGACGAGATCAACCAGCTGCTCGGCGTG1020 CGCGGCGCGTATGCGGAAGATCCCGTCGCGGTGATCCGCACGCATGCGAACCGGCTGAAG1080 CTGGCGGGGGCACGAGGAGGACGCGCGCCGCTGGCGCGCCGCGCCGTGGTCTATGGTGCC1140 GTGGGGCTGGCGGCGATTGCCGGCGTGGCGATGTGGAGCGGCGCGGGCCGGCATGGCGGG1200 ACGGGCGCATCCGGCGAGCCGCCGGATGCGTCGGCGGCACGCGGACCGGCTGCCGCACCG1260 CCGCAGGCCGCCGTGCCGGCAAGCACGAGCCTGCCGCCGTCGCTCGCCGGCTCCAGCGCG1320 CCCCGCTTGCCGCTCGATGCCGGCGGCCATCTCGCGAAGGCGCGCGCGGTGCGGGATTTC1380 TTCGACTACTGCCTGACCGCGCAGAGCGACCTGAGTGCGGCCGGGCTCGATGCGTTCGTC1440 ATGCGCGAGATTGCCGCACAGCTCGACGGGACCGTTGCGCAGGCCGAGGCGCTCGACGTG1500 TGGCACCGGTATCGCGCGTATCTCGACGCACTCGCGAAATTGCGCGATGCCGGCGCGGTC1560 GACAAGTCGGACCTGGGTGCATTGCAGCTCGCGCTCGACCAGCGCGCGTCGATCGCGTAC1620 CGGTGGCTCGGCGACTGGAGCCAGCCGTTCTTCGGTGCGGAGCAATGGCGGCAGCGCTAC1680 GACCTCGCGCGGCTGAAGATCGCGCAGGACCCCGCGCTGACGGATGCGCAGAAGGCCGAA1740 CGGCTCGCGGCGCTCGAACAGCAGATGCCGGCCGACGAACGCGCCGCGCAGCAGCGCGTC1800 GACCGGCAGCGCGCGGCGATCGACCAGATCGCGCAATTGCAGAAGAGCGGGGCGACGCCC1860 GATGCGATGCGCGCACAACTGACGCAGACGCTCGGCCCCGAAGCGGCCGCGCGCGTCGCG1920 CAGATGCAGCAGGACGACGCATCGTGGCAGAGGCGCTACGCGGACTACGCGGCGCAGCGT1980 GCGCAGATCGAGTCGGCCGGCCTGTCGCCGCAGGATCGCGACGCGCAGATCGCCGCGCTG2040 CGGCAGCGCGTGTTTACGAAGCCCGGCGAAGCCGTGCGCGCGGCATCGCTCGATCGCGGG2100 GCGGGCAGCGCGCGGTAA2118 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 19 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM3959 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6: ThrAlaArgGlyGlyArgAlaProLeuArgArgAlaValValTyrGly 151015 AlaValGly (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 19 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM3959 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7: AlaArgThrMetArgSerArgValValAlaGlyAlaValAlaAlaMet 151015 SerIleAla (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 17 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM3959 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8: AlaArgThrMetArgSerArgValValAlaGlyAlaValAlaMetIle 151015 Ala (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 56 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9: CGCGTAAGCTTCACATTGAAAGGGGAGGAGAATCATGGCCGCTGGCTACGCGGCGA56 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 56 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (genomic) (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: YES (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10: CGCGTCGCCGCGTAGCCAGCGGCCATGATTCTCCTCCCCTTTCAATGTGAAGCTTA56 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 6 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide (iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO (iii) ANTI-SENSE: NO (v) FRAGMENT TYPE: N-terminal (vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (A) ORGANISM: Pseudomonas cepacia (B) STRAIN: DSM3959 (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11: AlaAlaGlyTyrAlaAla 15 __________________________________________________________________________

## Claims

1. A process for preparing an active Pseudomonas lipase enzyme which requires a chaperone for refolding in vitro, the process comprising enzyme under suitable conditions to produce the lipase enzyme in inactive or partly active form, recovering the lipase enzyme from the culture, and subjecting the recovered lipase enzyme to denaturation, chaperone molecule, wherein the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas lipase modulator, and renaturation produces an active lipase enzyme.

2. The process of claim 1, wherein the chaperone molecule is produced by culturing a host cell transformed with a DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule under suitable conditions to produce the chaperone molecule and recovering the chaperone molecule from the culture.

3. The process of claim 1, wherein the chaperone molecule is subjected to a denaturation treatment before being added to the denatured lipase in step (b).

4. The process of claim 1, wherein the chaperone molecule is selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator, the Pseudomonas glumae lipase modulator, the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase modulator.

5. A process of claim 1, wherein the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

6. The process of claim 5, wherein the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase, and wherein the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator.

7. The process of claim 1, wherein the host cell for the production of the chaperone molecule is E. coli.

8. The process of claim 7, wherein the DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule is preceded by a promoter selected from the group consisting of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, or Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P.sub.R or P.sub.L promoters, the phage T7 gene 10 promoter or the E. coli lac promoter.

9. The process of claim 7, wherein the DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule is preceded by a ribosome binding site selected from the group consisting of the ribosome binding site of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, phage T7 gene 10 or E. coli lac gene.

10. The process of claim 1, wherein the chaperone molecule is produced intracellularly in a yield of at least 5% of total cellular protein.

11. A process for preparing an active Pseudomonas lipase enzyme which requires a chaperone for refolding in vitro, the process comprising enzyme under suitable conditions to produce the lipase enzyme in inactive or partly active form and recovering the lipase enzyme from the culture, the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas lipase modulator, and renaturation, wherein said renaturation produces an active lipase enzyme.

12. The process of claim 11, wherein the chaperone molecule is produced by culturing a host cell transformed with a DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule under suitable conditions to produce the chaperone molecule and recovering the chaperone molecule from the culture.

13. The process of claim 1, wherein the chaperone molecule is subjected to a denaturation treatment before being added to the denatured lipase in step (b).

14. The process of claim 11, wherein the chaperone molecule is selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator, the Pseudomonas glumae lipase modulator, the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase modulator.

15. A process of claim 11, wherein the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

16. The process of claim 15, wherein the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase, and wherein the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator.

17. The process of claim 11, wherein the host cell for the production of the chaperone molecule is E. coli.

18. The process of claim 11, wherein the DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule is preceded by a promoter selected from the group consisting of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, or Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P.sub.R or P.sub.L promoters, the phage T7 gene 10 promoter or the E. coli lac promoter.

19. The process of claim 17, wherein the DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule is preceded by a ribosome binding site selected from the group consisting of the ribosome binding site of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, phage T7 gene 10 or E. coli lac gene.

20. The process of claim 11, wherein the chaperone molecule is produced intracellularly in a yield of at least 5% of total cellular protein.

21. A process for preparing an active Pseudomonas lipase enzyme which requires a chaperone for refolding in vitro, the process comprising enzyme and with a DNA sequence encoding a chaperone molecule under suitable conditions to produce the lipase enzyme in inactive or partly active form and recovering a lipase enzyme chaperone molecule mixture from the culture, wherein the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas lipase modulator, and renaturation, wherein said renaturation produces an active lipase enzyme, optionally with addition of a further amount of chaperone molecule to the mixture.

22. The process of claim 21, wherein the chaperone molecule is selected from the group consisting of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator, the Pseudomonas glumae lipase modulator, the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase modulator.

23. A process of claim 21, wherein the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

24. The process of claim 23, wherein the lipase enzyme is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase, and wherein the chaperone molecule is a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator.

25. The process of claim 24, wherein the host cell for the production of the chaperone molecule is E. coli.

26. The process of claim 25, wherein the DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule is preceded by a promoter selected from the group consisting of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, or Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P.sub.R or P.sub.L promoters, the phage T7 gene 10 promoter or the E. coli lac promoter.

27. The process of claim 25, wherein the DNA sequence encoding the chaperone molecule is preceded by a ribosome binding site selected from the group consisting of the ribosome binding site of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, phage T7 gene 10 or E. coli lac gene.

28. The process of claim 21, wherein the chaperone molecule is produced intracellularly in a yield of at least 5% of total cellular protein.

29. A DNA construct comprising a first DNA sequence encoding a Pseudomonas lipase enzyme fused to a second DNA sequence encoding a Pseudomonas lipase modulator chaperone molecule, wherein the lipase enzyme and chaperone molecule are expressed as a single fusion protein on culturing a suitable host cell transformed with the DNA construct, and wherein the lipase enzyme is active.

30. The DNA construct of claim 29, wherein the first DNA sequence is one encoding a Pseudomonas cepacia, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas gladioli, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas stutzeri, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas glumae, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

31. The DNA construct of claim 29, wherein the second DNA sequence is one encoding a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator, a Pseudomonas glumae lipase modulator, a Pseudomonas aeroginosa lipase modulator.

32. The DNA construct of claim 29, wherein the first DNA sequence encodes a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase and wherein the second DNA sequence encodes a Pseudomonas cepacia lipase modulator.

33. The DNA construct of claim 32, wherein the DNA construct has the DNA sequence of SEQ ID NO:5.

34. A recombinant expression vector comprising the DNA construct of claim 29.

35. A host cell transformed with the vector of claim 34.

36. The host cell of claim 35, wherein the cell is a strain of E. coli.

37. The host cell of claim 36, wherein the DNA construct is preceded by the promoter of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, or Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, or by the phage Lambda P.sub.R or P.sub.L promoters, the phage T7 gene 10 promoter or the E. coli lac promoter.

38. The host cell of claim 36, wherein the DNA construct is preceded by the ribosome binding site of the Bacillus stearothermophilus maltogenic amylase gene, Bacillus licheniformis .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens .alpha.-amylase gene, Bacillus subtilis alkaline protease gene, Bacillus pumilus xylosidase gene, phage T7 gene 10 or E. coli lac gene.

39. A process for preparing a lipase in active form, the process comprising culturing the host cell of claim 35 under suitable conditions to produce the lipase, and recovering the lipase from the culture.