alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of INverso Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

INverso Corp.

Date: February 14, 2006

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan

Serge Atlan

Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §8531. Study and report

#### (a) Study of commercial and industrial storage of fuel

Not later than 180 days after November 5, 1979, the Secretary shall conduct a study and report to the Congress regarding the commercial and industrial storage of gasoline and middle distillates (other than storage in facilities which have capacities of less than 500 gallons or storage used exclusively and directly for agricultural, residential, petroleum refining, or pipeline transportation purposes).

#### (b) Contents of report

Such report shall—

(1) indicate to what extent storage activities have increased since November 1, 1978, and what business establishments (including utilities) have been involved;

(2) the estimated amount of gasoline and middle distillates (in the aggregate and by type and region) which are in storage within the United States at the time of the study, the amounts which were in storage at the same time during the calendar year preceding the study, and the purposes for which such storage is maintained; and

(3) contain such findings and recommendations for legislation and administrative action as the Secretary considers appropriate, including recommendations for improving the availability and quality of data concerning such storage.

(Pub. L. 96–102, title II, §241, Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 768.)
#### Estate of William G. O’Connor, Appellant, v O’Connor-Mosher *883and Co., Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant pleaded and plaintiff admits that plaintiffs testator did not have title to part of the land he agreed to convey and that the remainder of the land was subject to a setback provision. Lack of title and the existence of a restrictive covenant are factors that affect marketability of title and it cannot be said from the record that defendant’s defense is meritless as a matter of law. Both of defendant’s counterclaims are for breach of contract. Such a cause of action exists in favor of a purchaser when the seller cannot convey marketable title (1 Rasch, Real Property Law and Practice, § 1103). The counterclaims had also been interposed in a City Court action between the parties for nonpayment of rent and plaintiff moved to dismiss them on that ground. CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 4) states that "the court need not dismiss upon this ground but may make such order as justice requires”. Since these actions involve identical counterclaims, the consolidation ordered by Special Term was a proper means of eliminating multiplicity of actions (see CPLR 602, subd [a]). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—consolidate action). Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 92 ) ll-K - (B ) -8 0 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:51 AM Sheet 92 of 325P. 2 

# l\ P

II-K-(B)-8 0 COMPREHENSIV E COMPARISON O F POLLUTION

CONTRO L COST S USE DB YRADIA N VERSU S THOS E MODELE DI N IFCAM . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EE

A t o R . Short , EPArEAB . Septembe r 14 , 1981 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-8 0
#### Spiros Pappas, appellee, v. R. L. Langford, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,456.

Action for personal injuries sustained in automobile collision between plaintiff’s and defendant’s automobiles. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John F. O’Connell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed with a finding of fact.

Opinion filed December 10, 1923.

Cassels, Potter *So*Gilbert, for appellant; Ralph F. Potter and John W. Fisher, of counsel. John J. Lupe, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §§80, 80a. Repealed. Apr. 24, 1944, ch. 177, §4, 58 Stat. 215

Section 80, R.S. §§2237, 2240; acts Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; May 21, 1928, ch. 661, 45 Stat. 684; Aug. 22, 1935, ch. 602, 49 Stat. 680; Oct. 9, 1942, ch. 584, §7, 56 Stat. 779, provided that from and after Sept. 1, 1935, registers should be paid $2,000 per annum together with fees and commissions limited to $3,600 per annum. See section 79c of this title.

Section 80a, R.S. §§2237, 2240, provided that receivers should be paid $500 per annum together with fees and commissions limited to $3,000 per annum. See section 79c of this title.
§ 570.911 Reduction, withdrawal, or adjustment of a grant or other appropriate action. ( a ) *Opportunity for an informal consultation.* Prior to a reduction, withdrawal, or adjustment of a grant or other appropriate action, taken pursuant to paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section, the recipient shall be notified of such proposed action and given an opportunity within a prescribed time period for an informal consultation.
( b ) *Entitlement grants, Non-entitlement CDBG grants in Hawaii, and Insular Areas grants.* Consistent with the procedures described in § 570.900(b), the Secretary may make a reduction in the entitlement, non-entitlement CDBG grants in Hawaii, or Insular Areas grant amount either for the succeeding program year or, if the grant had been conditioned, up to the amount that had been conditioned. The amount of the reduction shall be based on the severity of the deficiency and may be for the entire grant amount.
( c ) *HUD-administered small cities grants.* Consistent with the procedures described in § 570.900(b), the Secretary may adjust, reduce or withdraw the grant or take other actions as appropriate, except that funds already expended on eligible approved activities shall not be recaptured or deducted from future grants.
( d ) *Urban Development Action Grants.* Consistent with the procedures described in § 570.900(b), the Secretary may adjust, reduce or withdraw the grant or take other actions as appropriate, except that funds already expended on eligible approved activities shall not be recaptured or deducted from future grants made to the recipient.
[61 FR 11481, Mar. 20, 1996, as amended at 72 FR 12537, Mar. 15, 2007; 72 FR 46371, Aug. 17, 2007]
CERTIFICATION

     I, Frank J. Travea,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Roebling Financial Corp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over  financial  reporting  (as defined in Exchange Act Rule  13a-15(f))
that  occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent  fiscal  quarter  that has
materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the issuer's
auditors and the audit  committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,  process,  summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees  who have a  significant  role in the issuer's  internal  control over
financial reporting.



Date: December 28, 2006
                                           /s/ Frank J. Travea, III
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Frank J. Travea, III
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The Universal Life Insurance Company, Respondent, *v.*Susan A. Van Dyke, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.

(Argued November 23, 1881;

decided January 17, 1882.)

*George Wilcox*for appellant.

*Charles B. Alexander*for respondent,

Agree to affirm; no oninion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNIFRAX
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND THEIR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,128)
<INVENTORY>                                      8,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,461
<PP&E>                                          69,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,623)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,532
<BONDS>                                        120,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,530
<SALES>                                         65,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,234
<CGS>                                           33,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended December 31, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Artcraft V,      Inc. |

| Date:      April 14, 2009                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| Artcraft      V, Inc.                                               |
|                                                                |
| By:      /s/ Li Te Xiao                                             |
| Li      Te XiaoChief      Executive OfficerChief Financial  Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         2629000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1050000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     14600
<INVENTORY>                                    3537000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8447000
<PP&E>                                        43877000
<DEPRECIATION>                                14283000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40298000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4371000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4000
<OTHER-SE>                                    15367000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40298000
<SALES>                                       17727000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              17908000
<CGS>                                         11188000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11188000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3953000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              909000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 767000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    300000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             467000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    467000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11



</TABLE>
### §911. New career training assistance

#### (a) Eligible employees

Any employee who elects to receive a separation allowance from the Milwaukee Railroad under an employee protection agreement entered into under section 908 of this title shall be entitled to receive from the Board expenses for training in qualified institutions for new career opportunities.

#### (b) Commencement of training as condition

To be entitled for assistance under this section, an employee must begin his course of training within two years following the date of his separation from employment with the Milwaukee Railroad.

#### (c) Filing of application; Board determination

Entitlement to expenses for assistance under this section shall be determined by the Board on the basis of an application therefor filed by an employee with the Board.

#### (d) Assistance prohibited after April 1, 1984

No assistance may be provided under this section after April 1, 1984.

#### (e) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) the term "expenses" means actual expenses paid for room, board, tuition, fees, or educational material in an amount not to exceed $3,000; and

(2) the term "qualified institution" means an educational institution accredited for payment by the Veterans' Administration under chapter 36 of title 38, or a State-accredited institution which has been in existence for not less than two years.

(Pub. L. 96–101, §12, Nov. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 743; Pub. L. 96–254, title I, §119(f), May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Subsec. (e)(2). Pub. L. 96–254 inserted reference to State-accredited institutions which have been in existence for not less than two years.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Reference to Veterans' Administration deemed to refer to Department of Veterans Affairs pursuant to section 10 of Pub. L. 100–527, set out as a Department of Veterans Affairs Act note under section 301 of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits.
### §423. Permanently unproductive lands; exclusion from project; disposition of water right

All lands found by the classification made under the supervision of the Board of Survey and Adjustments (House Document 201, 69th Congress, 1st Session, checked and modified as outlined in General Recommendations numbered 2 and 4, Page 60 of said document), to be permanently unproductive shall be excluded from the project and no water shall be delivered to them after the date of such exclusion unless and until they are restored to the project. Except as herein otherwise provided, the water right formerly appurtenant to such permanently unproductive lands shall be disposed of by the United States under the reclamation law: Provided, That the water users on the projects shall have a preference right to the use of the water: And provided further, That any surplus water temporarily available may be furnished upon a rental basis for use on lands excluded from the project under this section, on terms and conditions to be approved by the Secretary of the Interior.

(May 25, 1926, ch. 383, §§40, 41, 44 Stat. 647.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Sections 423 to 423g and 610 Unaffected by Sections 451 to 451k of This Title

Act Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §10, 67 Stat. 568, provided in part that: "Nothing contained in this Act [enacting sections 451 to 451k of this title] shall be held to repeal, supersede, or supplement the provisions for exchange and matters related thereto contained in the Act of May 25, 1926 (44 Stat. 636), as amended and supplemented [sections 423 to 423g and 610 of this title]."
#### McNeil & Higgins Company, appellee, v. Corbin Flour Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,166.

Action for breach of warranty of quality in sale of barrels of flour. *657Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Johnston, Jr., Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 31, 1923.

Rehearing denied and opinion modified June 11, 1923.

George E. Sankstone, for appellant; George F. Ort, of counsel. Charles Hudson, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Yujie J. Ding d/b/a Arklight 

Under Contract No. FA8650-07-C-5407 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60215 

Peter J. Scuderi, Esq. 

Philadelphia, PA 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Wayne J. Bober, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Philadelphia, PA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

For reasons indicated by one or both parties, the Board is unable to proceed with 

disposition of this appeal for an inordinate length of time due to factors not within the 

control of the Board. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice 

pursuant to Board Rule 18(b ). Unless either party or the Board acts to reinstate the 

appeal within one year from the date of this Order, the dismissal shall be deemed with 

prejudice. 

Dated: 4 April 2017 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60215, Appeal ofYujie J. Ding d/b/a 

Arklight, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
### SUBCHAPTER IV—RAILROAD RETIREMENT ACT OF 1974

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter is comprised of act Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, as amended in its entirety and completely revised by act June 24, 1937, ch. 382, part I, 50 Stat. 307, and as further amended in its entirety and completely revised by Pub. L. 93–445, title I, §101, Oct. 16, 1974, 88 Stat. 1305, eff. Jan. 1, 1975. The Act, as restated by Pub. L. 93–445, was redesignated the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974. See section 231t of this title. The Act is set out in this subchapter carrying a statutory credit showing restatement by act June 24, 1937 and a further restatement by Pub. L. 93–445 without reference to amendments made to the Act between its original enactment in 1935 and 1974. For history of the Act, credits, and note material, see subchapters II and III of this chapter.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3230 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3230

           To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,2-
                        Benzenedicarboxaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,2-
                        Benzenedicarboxaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,2-BENZENEDICARBOXALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.92 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1,2-Benzenedicarboxaldehyde) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```