T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AN DR E W C AL VI N C OL E Y, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C A S I M , D o c to r , L a n c a s te rS ta te P r is o n ; T R A Q U I N A , D oc t or , S ol a no S t a t e P r i s on, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 17114 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 9 3 4 - PM PG WF ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P hi l i p M . P r o, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rA ndr e w C a l vi n C ol e yappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng de l i be r a t e i ndi f

f e r e nc e t o s e r i ous m e di c a l ne e ds . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 

# FI LED MA Y24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17114 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F .3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dm a ya f

f irm o n a n yg r o u n ds u p p o rte db yth e r e c o r d , John son v. Ri v e rs i de H

e a l th c a r e S

ys . , LP , 5 3 4 F. 3 d1 1 1 6 , 1 1 2 1 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y grant ed sum m ary j ud gm entbecause C ol eyfa i l ed to r a is e ag e n u in e d is p u te o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rd e f

e n d a n ts c o n s c io u s ly d is r e g a r d e dar is kto C o le y ’s h e a lth b yf a ilin g to p r o v id e a n a d e q u a te d ie t f o rh is c o litis o rd e la y in g d ia g n o s tic te s ts th a t ru le do u t am o r e s e r io u s illn e s s . See T oguc hi , 39 1 F . 3d at10 58 (pri son o ff i ci al s are del i bera t el y i nd i ff er enton l y i f they k n o w o f a n dd isre g ar dan ex ce ss iv e r isko f s er io u s h ar m to in m ate h ea lth ). C o ley’s di s a gr e e m e ntw i th de f

e nda nt s ’ m e di c a l opi ni on a s t o hi s di a gnos i s orc our s e of tr e a tm e n t is n o t s u f

f ic ie n t to c o n s titu te d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e . Se e id . T he di stri ctcourt ’ s f

ai l ure t o rul e on C ol ey ’ s m ot i on s t o com pel further di s c ove ryt o oppos e one of the de f e nda nt ’ s m ot i on f

ors um m a ryj udgm e nti s not g r o u n d s f

o rr e v e r s a l b e c au s e C o le yf a ile dto s h o w h o w a d d itio n a l d is c o v e ryw o u ld h a v e p r e c lu d e ds u m m a ryju d g m e n t. See Chanc e v . P ac - T e l T e le tr ac I nc . , 242 F . 3d 1 1 5 1 , 1 1 6 1 n .6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( to o b ta in d is c o v e ryp e n d in g s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, m ov antm usthave di l i gent l y pursued di sc ov ery and show ho w addi t i on al di sc ov ery w o u ldp r e c lu d e s u m m a ryju d g m e n t) ; M ar gol is v . R y an , 14 0 F . 3d 85 0, 85 3 (9th C i r.09- 17114 3 1998) ( m ot i on t o c om pe l di s c ove ryt o oppos e s um m a ryj udgm e nton w hi c h the d is tr ic t c o u rt f

a ile dto ru le is r e v ie w e dd e n o v o ) . C ol e y ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons , i nc l udi ng thos e c onc e rni ng a l l e ge d due proces s vi ol at i on s, ar e unp er suas i ve. C ol e y ’ s r e que s t s f

orm i s c e l l a ne ous r e l i e f

, i nc l udi ng c onc e rni ng a c c e s s t o the l a w l i br a ry , a r e de ni e d. AF F I RME D.