alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 582.110 Matching requirements. ( a ) *Matching rental assistance with supportive services.* ( 1 ) To qualify for rental assistance grants, an applicant must certify that it will provide or ensure the provision of supportive services, including funding the services itself if the planned resources do not become available for any reason, appropriate to the needs of the population being served, and at least equal in value to the aggregate amount of rental assistance funded by HUD. The supportive services may be newly created for the program or already in operation, and may be provided or funded by other Federal, State, local, or private programs in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 11403b. This statute provides that a recipient may use funds from any source, including any other Federal source (but excluding the specific statutory subtitle from which S+C funds are provided), as well as State, local, and private sources, provided that funds from the other source are not statutorily prohibited to be used as a match.
( 2 ) Only services that are provided after the execution of the grant agreement may count toward the match.
( 3 ) It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that any funds or services used to satisfy the matching requirements of this section are eligible under the laws governing the funds or services to be used as matching funds or services for a grant awarded under this program.
( b ) *Availability to participants.* Recipients must give reasonable assurances that supportive services will be available to participants for the entire term of the rental assistance. The value of the services provided to a participant, however, does not have to equal the amount of rental assistance provided that participant, nor does the value have to be equal to the amount of rental assistance on a year-to-year basis.
( c ) *Calculating the value of supportive services.* In calculating the amount of the matching supportive services, applicants may count: ( 1 ) Salaries paid to staff of the recipient to provide supportive services to S+C participants;
( 2 ) The value of supportive services provided by other persons or organizations to S+C participants;
( 3 ) The value of time and services contributed by volunteers at the rate of $10.00 an hour, except for donated professional services which may be counted at the customary charge for the service provided (professional services are services ordinarily performed by donors for payment, such as the services of health professionals, that are equivalent to the services they provide in their occupations);
( 4 ) The value of any lease on a building used for the provision of supportive services, provided the value included in the match is no more than the prorated share used for the program; and
( 5 ) The cost of outreach activities, as described in § 582.325(a) of this part.
[58 FR 13892, Mar. 15, 1993, as amended at 73 FR 75325, Dec. 11, 2008]
§ 578.31 Environmental review. ( a ) Activities under this part are subject to environmental review by HUD under 24 CFR part 50. The recipient or subrecipient shall supply all available, relevant information necessary for HUD to perform, for each property, any environmental review required by 24 CFR part 50. The recipient or subrecipient must carry out mitigating measures required by HUD or select an alternate eligible property. HUD may eliminate from consideration any application that would require an Environmental Impact Statement.
( b ) The recipient or subrecipient, its project partners, and their contractors may not acquire, rehabilitate, convert, lease, repair, dispose of, demolish, or construct property for a project under this part, or commit or expend HUD or local funds for such eligible activities under this part, until HUD has performed an environmental review under 24 CFR part 50 and the recipient or subrecipient has received HUD approval of the property.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3169 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3169

    To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority for 
students who are eligible for Pell Grants who are adversely affected by 
                          a natural disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

  Mr. Keller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority for 
students who are eligible for Pell Grants who are adversely affected by 
                          a natural disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pell Grant Hurricane and Disaster 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVERS OF PELL GRANT REPAYMENT BY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY 
              DISASTERS.

    Section 484B(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1091b(b)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Waivers of pell grant repayment by students 
                affected by disasters.--The Secretary may waive the 
                amounts that students are required to return under this 
                section with respect to Pell grants if the withdrawals 
                on which the returns are based are withdrawals--
                            ``(i) by students--
                                    ``(I) who were residing in, 
                                employed in, or attending an 
                                institution of higher education that is 
                                located in an area that is designated 
                                by the President to warrant major 
                                disaster assistance under section 401 
                                of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
                                Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
                                U.S.C. 5170); and
                                    ``(II) whose attendance was 
                                interrupted because of the impact of 
                                the disaster on the student or the 
                                institution; and
                            ``(ii) that end within the academic year 
                        during which the designation occurred or during 
                        the next succeeding academic year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### GLASS et al., Appellants, v. MORRIS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 15, 1905.)

Action by George D. Glass and others against Cornelius J. Morris and others. N opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### §§ 9.141-9.148 [Reserved]
#### § 401.473 HUD grants for rehabilitation under section 236(s) of NA.

HUD will consider a direct grant for rehabilitation under section 236(s) of the NA only if the owner provides an acceptable work schedule and cost-analysis that is consistent with the owner's evaluation of physical condition under § 401.450, as certified by the PAE. The owner must execute a grant agreement with terms and conditions acceptable to HUD. If the PAE is a State or local government, or an agency or instrumentality of such a government, the PAE and HUD may agree that the PAE will be delegated the responsibility for the administration of any grant made under this section. HUD may make grant funding available for the cost of administration if HUD has determined that such funding is available.
#### MINER, Respondent, v. HOSINGTON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Action by Sabrie Miner agains't George A. Hosington. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
§ 291.515 Purchaser qualifications. To qualify to purchase a home through the GNND Sales Program: ( a ) The person must be employed as a law enforcement officer (as described in § 291.520), teacher (as described in § 291.525), or firefighter/emergency medical technician (as described in § 291.530) at the time he/she submits a bid to purchase a home through the program and at the time of closing on the purchase of the home;
( b ) The person must certify to his/her good faith intention to continue employment as a law enforcement officer (as described in § 291.520), teacher (as described in § 291.525), or firefighter/emergency medical technician (as described in § 291.530) for at least one year following the date of closing;
( c ) The person must make an earnest money deposit at the time of signing the contract for purchase of the home, as described in § 291.535;
( d ) The person must agree to own, and live in as his/her sole residence, the home for the entire duration of the owner-occupancy term, as described in § 291.540, and to certify to that occupancy, as described in § 291.565;
( e ) The person must agree to execute a second mortgage and note on the home, as described in § 291.550, for the difference between the list price and the discounted selling price;
( f ) Neither the person (nor his/her spouse) may have owned any residential real property during the year prior to the date of submitting a bid on the home being acquired through the GNND Sales Program;
( g ) Neither the person (nor his/her spouse) must ever have purchased another home under the GNND Sales Program or under the predecessor Officer Next Door Sales and Teacher Next Door Sales Programs; and
( h ) Although both spouses, if otherwise eligible, may submit a bid on a single home made available for sale under the GNND Sales Program, HUD will approve a bid from only one spouse.
#### COOKE, Appellant, v. CHURCH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 21, 1905.)

Action by Lillian Cooke, an infant, by Jesse A. Cooke, her guardian, against Theodore Church.

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, so as to require the plaintiff, within 20 days from the entry of this order and notice thereof, to give to the defendant a bill of particulars setting forth the following particulars: First, the particular way or manner in which it is claimed that the defendant was careless and negligent in operating and driving an automobile, other than in. failing to sound a warning, or in driving at high and unlawful rate of speed; second, the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by plaintiff, as far as such injuries have developed, and what injuries are claimed to be permanent; third, the period or periods of time during which plaintiff claims to have been confiñed to her bed under medical care and treatment, and the extent of the liability incurred for medical attendance. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without.costs to either party.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3269 

To amend the International Organizations Immunities Act to provide for 

the applicability of that Act to the Bank for International Settlements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2005 

Mr. LEACH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on International Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the International Organizations Immunities Act 

to provide for the applicability of that Act to the Bank 

for International Settlements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE BANK FOR INTER4 NATIONAL SETTLEMENTS UNDER THE INTER5 NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IMMUNITIES ACT. 

6 The International Organizations Immunities Act (22 

7 U.S.C. 288 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 17. The provisions of this title may be ex10 tended to the Bank for International Settlements in the 
2 

•HR 3269 IH 

1 same manner, to the same extent, and subject to the same 

2 conditions, as they may be extended to a public inter3 national organization in which the United States partici4 pates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of 

5 any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or 

6 making an appropriation for such participation.’’. 

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-16 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee By:
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName:
    Nancy H. ForteTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Date: March 29, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 

I,Matthew J. Nelson, certify that:

 

     1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filedin respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., on behalf of PPLUSTrust Series GSC-2;

 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the poolingand servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

     4. Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar,agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosedin the reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

 

     5. Thereports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the depositor or trustee with the minimum servicingor similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliancewith the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling or servicing,or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:The Bank of New York Mellon and its officers and agents. 
     Date: March 21, 2023/s/    Matthew J. Nelson  Matthew J. Nelson
§ 60.107 IRB membership. ( a ) Each IRB shall have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution. The IRB shall be sufficiently qualified through the experience and expertise of its members (professional competence), and the diversity of its members, including race, gender, and cultural backgrounds and sensitivity to such issues as community attitudes, to promote respect for its advice and counsel in safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects. The IRB shall be able to ascertain the acceptability of proposed research in terms of institutional commitments (including policies and resources) and regulations, applicable law, and standards of professional conduct and practice. The IRB shall therefore include persons knowledgeable in these areas. If an IRB regularly reviews research that involves a category of subjects that is vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, individuals with impaired decision-making capacity, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, consideration shall be given to the inclusion of one or more individuals who are knowledgeable about and experienced in working with these categories of subjects.
( b ) Each IRB shall include at least one member whose primary concerns are in scientific areas and at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas.
( c ) Each IRB shall include at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the institution and who is not part of the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the institution.
( d ) No IRB may have a member participate in the IRB's initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB.
( e ) An IRB may, in its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues that require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals may not vote with the IRB.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000785791
<NAME> ASSOCIATED PLANNERS REALTY FUND L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         201,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,905
<PP&E>                                       7,038,072
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,347,742)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,948,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,302
<BONDS>                                      1,454,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,228,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,948,512
<SALES>                                        346,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,709
<CGS>                                          237,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.05
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:09-cv-02671-EMC Document 25 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-02671-EMC Document 25 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001021810
<NAME>                        INTELIDATA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                305
<SECURITIES>                       10,770
<RECEIVABLES>                      22,896
<ALLOWANCES>                       (5,738)
<INVENTORY>                        19,673
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   48,302
<PP&E>                             11,825
<DEPRECIATION>                     (2,817)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     58,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              15,868
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               32
<OTHER-SE>                         42,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       58,886
<SALES>                            46,358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   50,135
<CGS>                              43,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      45,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   88,441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      718
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (81,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                           61
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (81,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (81,850)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### HAUSMAN, Appellant, v. MILLER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Max Hausman against Elizabeth Miller and others. B. F. Feiner, for appellant. I. N. Williams, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Hausman v. Herdtfelder, 81 App. Div. 46, 80 N. Y. Supp. 1039.
Exhibit 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                 SECTION 1350 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of WORLDTEK CORP. hereby certifies, to the best of his
knowledge that:

1.       The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
         annual period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  May  28, 2004
                                                     /s/ Jack Fishman
                                                     -----------------
                                                     Jack Fishman
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2885

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacet-o-Chloro Anilide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacet-o-Chloro 

Anilide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACETOACET-O-CHLORO ANILIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.09 Butanamide, N (2 Chloro 

Phenyl) 3 Oxo (CAS No. 

93–70–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2924.29.75) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2885 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ