alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2903. Custody and control of property

(a) The Archivist shall have immediate custody and control of the National Archives Building and its contents, and may design, construct, purchase, lease, maintain, operate, protect, and improve buildings used by him for the storage of records of Federal agencies in the District of Columbia and elsewhere.

(b) When the Archivist considers it to be in the public interest, the Archivist may charge and collect reasonable fees from the public for the occasional, non-official use of rooms and spaces, and services related to such use, in the buildings subject to this section. Fees collected under this subsection shall be paid into an account in the National Archives Trust Fund and shall be held, administered, and expended for the benefit and in the interest of the national archival and records activities administered by the National Archives and Records Administration, including educational and public program purposes.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1296; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(15)(A), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2288; Pub. L. 108–383, §4(b), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2218.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §392 (June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title V, §502, as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(d), 64 Stat. 583).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–383 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist" for "Administrator".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
#### Mary Plate, Respondent, v Palisade Film Delivery Corp., et al., Appellants.

[835 NYS2d 324]—

*836In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated November 11, 2005, which, upon granting the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law on the issues of causation and serious injury, made at the close of evidence, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $2,000,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law is denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.

This action arises from a two-car collision occurring on February 25, 2002, wherein an Isuzu box truck owned by the defendant Palisade Film Delivery Corp. and operated by the defendant Douglas Lieberman, struck the plaintiffs car from behind, at an intersection in Long Island City. The evidence presented at trial revealed that the plaintiff had been involved in a motor vehicle accident in 1997 and had undergone two cervical discectomies prior to the subject accident (one in 1998, the other in 2001) to treat the injuries sustained in the earlier accident. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants, and a trial ensued.

At the close of evidence, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law on the issues of causation and serious injury. A trial court’s grant of a motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law is appropriate only where the trial court finds that, upon the evidence presented, there is no rational process by which the fact trier could base a finding in favor of the nonmoving party *(see Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997]; *Tapia v Dattco, Inc.,*32 AD3d 842 [2006]). In considering the motion, “the trial court must afford the party opposing the motion every inference which may properly be drawn from the facts presented, and the facts must be considered in a light most favorable to the nonmovant” *(Szczerbiak v Pilat, supra*at 556; *see Hand v Field,*15 AD3d 542, 543 [2005]). Based upon the trial testimony of the parties’ medical experts, the jury could have rationally found in favor of the nonmovants on the issues of causation and serious injury.

*837The Supreme Court erred in its determination that the defendants’ biomechanical engineering expert was not qualified to testify regarding whether the force of the impact in the subject accident could have caused a serious injury or exacerbated a preexisting injury to the plaintiffs cervical spine and in precluding that testimony (see *Borawski v Huang,*34 AD3d 409 [2006]; *Moon Ok Kwon v Martin,*19 AD3d 664 [2005]). This testimony could have affected the amount of the damages awarded.

Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiffs motion, and a new trial is warranted. Schmidt, J.P., Spolzino, Florio and Skelos, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      11,358,400
<SECURITIES>                                 2,041,600
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,730,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   264,300
<INVENTORY>                                 16,595,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,763,900
<PP&E>                                       9,540,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,998,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,999,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,836,000
<BONDS>                                      1,013,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        9,641,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,800
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,416,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,999,900
<SALES>                                     19,957,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,957,200
<CGS>                                       15,523,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,798,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             147,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,999,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (779,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,219,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,993,700)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,213,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
### §1575a. Administration and disposition of lands and constructed facilities; revenues credited to general fund of Treasury

The Secretary is hereby authorized to administer and dispose of lands and interests in lands acquired, and facilities constructed under this subchapter, and revenues received in connection with this authority shall be credited to the general fund of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 93–320, title I, §106, as added Pub. L. 96–336, §4, Sept. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1064.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 106 of Pub. L. 93–320 was renumbered section 107 and is classified to section 1576 of this title.
§ 320.15 Default. ( a ) *Issuer default.* Any failure or inability of the issuer to make payments as due as well as such other events as may be identified by the Association and included in the applicable guaranty agreement, contractual agreement or MBS Guide, shall constitute a default of the issuer.
( b ) *Action upon default.* Upon any default by the issuer, the Association may: ( 1 ) Institute a claim against the issuer's insurance, bond or other coverage, as specified in § 320.11;
( 2 ) Pursuant to section 306(g) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1721(g)), extinguish all the right, title, or other interest of the issuer in the pooled mortgages; and
( 3 ) Exercise such other rights and remedies as it may have.
### **CHAPTER 537—LOANS AND GUARANTEES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL

Sec.
53701.
Definitions.
53702.
General authority.
53703.
Application and administration.
53704.
Funding limits.
53705.
Pledge of United States Government.
53706.
Eligible purposes of obligations.
53707.
Findings related to obligors and operators.
53708.
Findings related to economic soundness.
53709.
Amount of obligations.
53710.
Contents of obligations.
53711.
Security interest.
53712.
Monitoring financial condition and operations of obligor.
53713.
Administrative fees.
53714.
Guarantee fees.
53715.
Escrow fund.
53716.
Deposit fund.
53717.
Management of funds in the Treasury.
53718.
Annual report to Congress.
53719.
Best practices.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—DEFAULT PROVISIONS

53721.
Rights of obligee.
53722.
Actions by Secretary or Administrator.
53723.
Payments by Secretary or Administrator and issuance of obligations.
53724.
Rights to secured property.
53725.
Actions against obligor.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PARTICULAR PROJECTS

53731.
Commercial demonstration ocean thermal energy conversion facilities and plantships.
[53732.
Repealed.]
53733.
Shipyard modernization and improvement.
53734.
Replacement of vessels because of changes in operating standards.
53735.
Fisheries financing and capacity reduction.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. C, title XXXV, §3514(g), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 811, added item 53703 and struck out former item 53703 "Application procedures".

**2019**—Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXV, §3506(l), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1974, added item 53719 and struck out item 53732 "Eligible export vessels".

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3522(a)(10)(A), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 598, inserted "or Administrator" after "Secretary" in items 53722 and 53723.
§ 578.77 Calculating occupancy charges and rent. ( a ) *Occupancy agreements and leases.* Recipients and subrecipients must have signed occupancy agreements or leases (or subleases) with program participants residing in housing.
( b ) *Calculation of occupancy charges.* Recipients and subrecipients are not required to impose occupancy charges on program participants as a condition of residing in the housing. However, if occupancy charges are imposed, they may not exceed the highest of: ( 1 ) 30 percent of the family's monthly adjusted income (adjustment factors include the number of people in the family, age of family members, medical expenses, and child-care expenses);
( 2 ) 10 percent of the family's monthly income; or
( 3 ) If the family is receiving payments for welfare assistance from a public agency and a part of the payments (adjusted in accordance with the family's actual housing costs) is specifically designated by the agency to meet the family's housing costs, the portion of the payments that is designated for housing costs.
( 4 ) *Income.* Income must be calculated in accordance with 24 CFR 5.609 and 24 CFR 5.611(a). Recipients and subrecipients must examine a program participant's income initially, and if there is a change in family composition (*e.g.,* birth of a child) or a decrease in the resident's income during the year, the resident may request an interim reexamination, and the occupancy charge will be adjusted accordingly.
( c ) *Resident rent.* ( 1 ) *Amount of rent.* ( i ) Each program participant on whose behalf rental assistance payments are made must pay a contribution toward rent in accordance with section 3(a)(1) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437a(a)(1)).
( ii ) Income of program participants must be calculated in accordance with 24 CFR 5.609 and 24 CFR 5.611(a).
( 2 ) *Review.* Recipients or subrecipients must examine a program participant's income initially, and at least annually thereafter, to determine the amount of the contribution toward rent payable by the program participant. Adjustments to a program participant's contribution toward the rental payment must be made as changes in income are identified.
( 3 ) *Verification.* As a condition of participation in the program, each program participant must agree to supply the information or documentation necessary to verify the program participant's income. Program participants must provide the recipient or subrecipient with information at any time regarding changes in income or other circumstances that may result in changes to a program participant's contribution toward the rental payment.
§ 574.210 Eligible applicants. ( a ) All States, units of general local government, and nonprofit organizations, may apply for grants for projects of national significance.
( b ) Only those States and units of general local government that do not qualify for formula grants, as described in § 574.100; may apply for grants for other projects as described in § 574.200(a)(2).
( c ) Except for grants for projects of national significance, nonprofit organizations are not eligible to apply directly to HUD for a grant but may receive funding as a project sponsor under contract with a grantee.
oe —__—_____ oo _ Bn
IMB | DRAWING NUMBER | [DRAWING NUMBER | | DRAWING NUMBER | ; DRAWING |
| |
LM-I4D | 1: 100, 000 | | |
D> roey Canyon, LA, AL | L — __ \ L_
1. CORPORATION d ANIA PLAN HOLD CORI TION IRVINE ORNI ANIA PLAN HOLD ¢ RPC
—_ oe — ee eee _ _ i _ a oe
‘ Py
a 5 S = 3S S +:
Oo + 9 x g
s TMM N _— — GS zg :
Os Ss oO
ao fey) [op (op) cop) oO
NS N N ian) N
oO = oO
GS Is GS
5, 0
0 @

am ©
a 2
a a ee ee TIRANKK RRR BE aA eeeePeeeel Ve Wee
PS x ° ‘4 A A &
\ BC \\S 5 a
\ 3 o % Py “
€ wa -
3
‘ 7 cy
O 0
OO > r Ki
\ ce Y :
a> ‘ ae
\ aX NI
ee) \
2
\
aS

-~88? 06’ 00”
Contours-.in corrected meters

LM /40

DORSEY CANYON N290088W

SCALE: 1:100,000
NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS

~ -88°12' 00"

~88° 18’ 00"

-88° 24’ 00"

88% 30 GO"

-B8* 36’ 08"

-88% 42’ 00"
-887 42’ BO"

88°48 00"

-~88°54’ 00"

-89*00' 00"

29* 30’ 00
29% 24' 00"
29°18’ 00
29° 12’ QO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., et

al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ

 C08-4118 BZ

 C09-2016 BZ

 Following a telephone conference where all parties were

represented by counsel, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant Maximus shall file its motion to sever by

MARCH 24, 2010. Any opposition shall be filed by APRIL 7,

2010. Any reply shall be filed by APRIL 14, 2010.

2. The motion to sever is scheduled to be heard on MAY

5, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal

Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California

94102. 

3. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed by MAY

12, 2010. The parties shall cooperate in filing a joint

Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ Document 53 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

statement of undisputed facts. Any opposition shall be filed

by JUNE 2, 2010. Any reply shall be filed by JUNE 9, 2010. 

The motions for summary judgment are scheduled to be heard on

JUNE 30, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.. 

4. This case is scheduled for trial beginning NOVEMBER

29, 2010. The pretrial conference is scheduled for NOVEMBER

9, 2010 at 4:00 p.m.. The trial date scheduled for JULY 19,

2010 is VACATED. The disclosure and discovery deadlines in

the Order dated February 2, 2010 shall remain in effect. 

Dated: February 9, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\BRIEFING ORDER.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ Document 53 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai
Pharmaceutical, Inc., the “Company,” on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I, Yongqiang Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.         That
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: April 9, 2012

| | SHENGTAI PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | /s/ Yongqiang Wang           
| | Yongqiang Wang               
| | Chief Financial Officer
### §364e. Standardization of geographic names; abolition of United States Board on Geographical Names in Department of the Interior; transfer of duties

With respect to geographic names the pertinent decisions and principles issued by the Secretary shall be standard for all material published by the Federal Government. The United States Board on Geographical Names in the Department of the Interior created by Executive order, is abolished, and the duties of said Board are transferred to the Board herein created, and all departments, bureaus, and agencies of the Federal Government shall refer all geographic names and problems to the said Board for the purpose of eliminating duplication of work, personnel, and authority.

(July 25, 1947, ch. 330, §6, 61 Stat. 457.)
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the amendment
      to the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig A. Zabala, as acting Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  May
      8,
      2006








/s/
      Craig A. Zabala


Craig
      A.
      Zabala


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:09-cv-00181-MMC Document 30 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 2
May 5, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00181-MMC Document 30 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Bernard S. Roth (Admitted to Practice Under the Name of Bernard Sheldon Roth), an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

June 26, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Francis F. Doran (Louis J. Profera*of counsel), for petitioner.

*John G. Bonomi*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on October 20, 1954, under the name of Bernard Sheldon Roth.

On March 15, 1975 the respondent pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to violating subdivision (f) of section 201 of title 18 of the United States Code, in that he knowingly and unlawfully did directly give a sum of money in excess of $27,000 to employees *797of the Federal Housing Administration, an agency of the United States, for and because of official acts performed by said employees otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of their official duties. On September 19, 1975 the respondent was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of two years. The execution of the sentence was suspended and the respondent was placed on probation for a period of three years and fined $10,000.

The petitioner moves to have the respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, contending that the respondent is subject to automatic disbarment pursuant to *Matter of Chu*(42 NY2d 490).

The respondent cross-moves (1) to dismiss the petitioner’s motion on the ground that he is not subject to summary disbarment under *Matter of Chu (supra)*and (2) for an order directing the petitioner to institute a disciplinary proceeding against him on the ground that he is entitled to a hearing, in mitigation and explanation, before a Referee.

Under the circumstances herein, the petitioner’s motion is granted, the respondent’s cross motion is denied *in toto*and the clerk of this court is directed to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.
#### Henry S. Blum and Fred C. Ehman, appellants, v. Harrison M. Parker, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,050.

Assumpsit for alleged breach of written contract for sale and purchase of stock. Judgment for defendants. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar E. Heard, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

*652Busch, Leesman & Roemer, for appellants. Stedman, Kesler *&*Dingle, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
### Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma aeromagnetic and gravity maps and data: A web site for distribution of data

By: Ronald E. SweeneyPatricia L. Hill

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds138

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
#### Issac Zagoory, Plaintiff, v Maurice Fein, an Infant, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Milton Fein, et al., Defendants. Wallman & Wechsler, P. C., Appellant, v Friedman & Friedman et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action in which plaintiff had been represented by three different attorneys, the firm of Wallman & Wechsler, P. C., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 8, 1976, which, after a hearing, fixed the fees of the respective attorneys. Order affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Special Term correctly held that the appellant law firm was bound by a stipulation between the plaintiff and the first and second attorneys who represented him. The stipulation created a lien in favor of the first attorney on the net amount which would be paid as attorneys’ fees. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Titone and O’connor, JJ., Concur.
### §3702. Advertisements not to be published without written authority

Advertisements, notices, or proposals for an executive department of the Government, or for a bureau or office connected with it, may not be published in a newspaper except under written authority from the head of the department; and a bill for advertising or publication may not be paid unless there is presented with the bill a copy of the written authority.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1305.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §324 (R.S. §3828).