alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 5 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00839

- CR

TOREY BOYKIN, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 366

- 82130

- 2012



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On December 16, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2 ) appellant is indigent and represented by court

- appointed counsel Lara Bracamonte; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is that there has been serious illness in her immediate family which resulted in counsel falling behind on her work; and (4) counsel represented that she could file appellant’s brief by March 28, 2014.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief by MARCH 28, 2014

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parti es.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
(June 29, 1960)

(Republished)

#### Wilfrid Pelletier, Respondent, v. Mildred Mooney, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order, dated May 6, 1960, denying defendant’s motion to open her default in answering the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted on condition that defendant-appellant within 20 days of the service of the order herein, with notice of entry thereof, pay the full costs and disbursements of the action to-date, together with the costs and disbursements of this appeal, and serve a copy of her proposed answer, and on the further condition that defendant-appellant obtain the -appearance or written consent to appearance of the codefend-ant John T. Carroll, and, otherwise, the order is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. Defendant-appellant’s neglect is not so grave, nor was it of such persistence, as to justify preclusion absolutely of her right to defend the action. Settle order. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
| Exhibit 99.3 **EMC**Mortgage Corporation Officer's Certificate BSABS 2004-HE5 I, Mark D. Ehrenreich, Senior Vice President of EMC Mortgage Corporation, do hereby certify to the designated Trustee that in respect to the period ending November 30, 2004, a review of the activities of EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") during the preceding fiscal year or applicable portion thereof and it's performance under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision. To the best of  my knowledge, based on such review, EMC has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment of any such obligations, specifying each such default known to such Servicing Officer the nature and status thereof except for such defaults as such officer in its good faith judgment believe to be immaterial. ***/s/ Mark D. Ehrenreich*Mark D. Ehrenreich, Senior Vice President *2/28/05*Date** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### HEILBRON, Respondent, v. HERZOG, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Julius Heilbron against Abraham S. Herzog. J. J. Frank, for appellant. B. N. Cardozo, for' respondent. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
§ 883.310 Property standards. ( a ) *New Construction.* Projects must comply with: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) In the case of manufactured homes, the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, pursuant to Title VI of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and 24 CFR part 3280;
( 3 ) In the case of congregate or single room occupant housing, the appropriate HUD guidelines and standards,
( 4 ) HUD requirements pursuant to Section 209 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for projects for the elderly or the handicapped;
( 5 ) HUD requirements pertaining to noise abatement and control; and
( 6 ) Applicable state and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations.
( b ) *Substantial Rehabilitation.* Projects must comply with: ( 1 ) [Reserved]
( 2 ) In the case of congregate or single room occupant housing, the appropriate HUD guidelines and standards,
( 3 ) HUD requirements pursuant to Section 209 of the HCD Act for projects for the elderly or the handicapped;
( 4 ) HUD requirements pertaining to noise abatement and control;
( 5 ) The Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851-4856), and implementing regulations at part 35, subparts A, B, H, and R of this title.
( 6 ) Applicable State and local laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations.
( c ) *Smoke detectors* — ( 1 ) *Performance requirement.* After October 30, 1992, each dwelling unit must include at least one battery-operated or hard-wired smoke detector, in proper working condition, on each level of the unit. If the unit is occupied by hearing-impaired persons, smoke detectors must have an alarm system, designed for hearing-impaired persons, in each bedroom occupied by a hearing-impaired person.
( 2 ) *Acceptability criteria.* The smoke detector must be located, to the extent practicable, in a hallway adjacent to a bedroom, unless the unit is occupied by a hearing-impaired person, in which case each bedroom occupied by a hearing-impaired person must have an alarm system connected to the smoke detector installed in the hallway.
[45 FR 6889, Jan. 30, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 9269, Mar. 7, 1985; 57 FR 33851, July 30, 1992; 63 FR 46579, Sept. 1, 1998; 64 FR 50227, Sept. 15, 1999]
- Front Matter
Information Page
Title Page
Citation Page
Table of Contents
Tables
Figures
Acknowledgments
Executive Summary

- Chapter 1 - Introduction
- Chapter 2 - Sources, Description, and Limitations of Data
- Chapter 3 - Current Employment in Ghana and Bolivia
- Chapter 4 - Labor Force Cycling Behaviors of Women in Ghana and Bolivia
- Chapter 5 - Some Hypotheses on Women's Labor Force Participation
- Chapter 6 - Variables and Methods
- Chapter 7 - Results of Multivariate Analyses
- Chapter 8 - Summary and Conclusions
- References
- Demographic and Health Surveys Occasional Paper Series

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T01:37:17-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A185
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000808420
<NAME> ASSOCIATED PLANNERS REALTY INCOME FUND
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         170,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,394
<PP&E>                                       4,887,188
<DEPRECIATION>                               (854,617)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,213,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,127
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,175,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,213,937
<SALES>                                         85,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,601
<CGS>                                           53,632
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,969
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.55
        

</TABLE>
§ 3280.505 Air infiltration. ( a ) *Envelope air infiltration.* The opaque envelope shall be designed and constructed to limit air infiltration to the living area of the home. Any design, material, method or combination thereof which accomplishes this goal may be used. The goal of the infiltration control criteria is to reduce heat loss/heat gain due to infiltration as much as possible without impinging on health and comfort and within the limits of reasonable economics. ( 1 ) *Envelope penetrations.* Plumbing, mechanical and electrical penetrations of the pressure envelope not exempted by this part, and installations of window and door frames shall be constructed or treated to limit air infiltration. Penetrations of the pressure envelope made by electrical equipment, other than distribution panel boards and cable and conduit penetrations, are exempt from this requirement. Cable penetrations through outlet boxes are considered exempt.
( 2 ) *Joints between major envelope elements.* Joints not designed to limit air infiltration between wall-to-wall, wall-to-ceiling and wall-to-floor connections shall be caulked or otherwise sealed. When walls are constructed to form a pressure envelope on the outside of the wall cavity, they are deemed to meet this requirement.
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   | /s/ Martin S. Craighead  |
|   |   | Name: |   | Martin S. Craighead |
|   |   | Title: |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Date: |   | July 28, 2016 |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   | /s/ Kimberly A. Ross  |
|   |   | Name: |   | Kimberly A. Ross |
|   |   | Title: |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | Date: |   | July 28, 2016 |
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 16

- 00286

- CR

IN RE JUSTIN S. MATT HEWS

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Justin S. Matthews’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed on September 2, 2016

.

The Court requests a response from the other parties to the proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 52.8(b). Any response shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court no later than 14 days

from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Before Chie f Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Response requested

Order issued and filed September 14 , 2016
[No. 6871.

Decided April 4, 1908.]

#### Amos Wilcox, *Respondent,*v. Katie Watson, *Appellant.**1*

Appeal — Review—Findings. Findings upon conflicting evidence . by a trial judge who heard and saw the witnesses will not be disturbed on appeal when sustained by the evidence and there is nothing in the record to justify any modification.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered January 9, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of forcible entry and detainer.

Affirmed.

*Scott & Campbell,*for appellant.

*Roche & Onstine,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 94 Pac. 1135.

*216Per Curiam.

This is an action of forcible detainer, prosecuted by the plaintiff, Amos Wilcox, against the defendant, Katie Watson, to recover possession of the two upper floors and basement of a business block in the city of Spokane, upon which plaintiff held a lease from the owners. There was a lodging house in the two upper floors, which had been provided with furniture purchased under a conditional bill of sale. About April 30, 1906, the plaintiff sublet the basement, lodging house, and furniture to the defendant, who agreed to pay all installments of purchase money on the conditional bill of sale, as they matured, to pay rent to the owners of the building, to run the lodging house, and to receive the profits, and in the absence of any default was to have an option to purchase the lease, lodging house, and furniture at a stipulated price at any time prior to May 1, 1907. The plaintiff, claiming the defendant had failed to make the payments as agreed, gave written notice terminating her tenancy, and commenced this action, in which he obtained immediate possession under a writ of restitution. On final trial, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a judgment were entered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The only issue on this appeal is whether the evidence sustains the findings and judgment. There is a dispute between the parties as to the exact nature of the contract, as to the validity of certain alleged liens on the furniture, and as to whether any default had been made by the appellant. We have carefully examined all the evidence, and conclude that it sustains the findings made by the trial judge, which in turn sustain the final judgment. No good purpose will be served by stating the evidence in detail, although much conflict existed. The trial judge saw the witnesses, heard them testify, and passed upon their credibility. We find nothing in the record to justify us in modifying the findings which he has made.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000858346
<NAME> WEST COAST REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,666,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,745,800
<PP&E>                                      30,614,386
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,309,161)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,588,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,167,028
<BONDS>                                     11,131,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,289,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,588,340
<SALES>                                        794,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               826,392
<CGS>                                          334,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  334,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             233,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
### §920. Continuation of service

(a) Until the occurrence of an event described in subsection (b) of this section, the Milwaukee Railroad (1) shall maintain its entire railroad system, as it existed on October 15, 1979, (2) shall continue no less than the regular level of service provided by it as of that date, and (3) shall not embargo traffic (other than when necessitated by acts of God or safety requirements) or abandon or discontinue service over any part of its railroad system.

(b) The Milwaukee Railroad shall comply with the requirements of subsection (a) of this section until—

(1) an employee or employee-shipper ownership plan is not submitted to the Interstate Commerce Commission within the time period prescribed under section 905(a) of this title;

(2) the proposed plan is found by the Commission not to be feasible or the Commission does not act within 30 days;

(3) the proposed plan is found by the bankruptcy court not to be fair and equitable to the estate of the Milwaukee Railroad; or

(4) the plan is not implemented within the time period prescribed under section 905(c) of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–101, §22, Nov. 4, 1979, 93 Stat. 746.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions

Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
#### § 3280.901 Scope.

Subpart J of this standard covers the general requirement for designing the structure of the manufactured home to fully withstand the adverse effects of transportation shock and vibration without degradation of the integrated structure or of its component parts and the specific requirements pertaining to the transportation system and its relationship to the structure.
Exhibit 31

Certification

I, John Olinski, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of IndyMac
MBS, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
 report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and


5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.


Date: March 23, 2005

/s/:  John Olinski
      John Olinski
      Executive Vice President
Order filed, August 14, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00559

- CV

____________ SPRING BRANCH INDEPE NDENT SCHOOL DISTRIC T AND CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant

V.

SOUTHWEST PRECISION PRINTERS, LP , Appellee

On Appea l from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 41614



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 13, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Darlene Stein , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM