alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1640. Relinquishment of selections partly within conservation units

Whenever a valid State or Native selection is partly in and partly out of the boundary of a conservation system unit, notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the State or any Native Corporation may relinquish its rights in any portion of any validly selected Federal land, including land underneath waters, which lies within the boundary of the conservation system unit. Upon relinquishment, the Federal land (including land underneath waters) so relinquished within the boundary of the conservation system unit shall become, and be administered as, a part of the conservation system unit. The total land entitlement of the State or Native Corporation shall not be affected by such relinquishment. In lieu of the lands and waters relinquished by the State, the State may select pursuant to the Alaska Statehood Act as amended by this Act, an equal acreage of other lands available for such purpose. The Native Corporation may retain an equal acreage from overselection lands on which selection applications were otherwise properly and timely filed. A relinquishment pursuant to this section shall not invalidate an otherwise valid State or Native Corporation land selection outside the boundaries of the conservation system unit, on the grounds that, after such relinquishment, the remaining portion of the land selection no longer meets applicable requirements of size, compactness, or contiguity, or that the portion of the selection retained immediately outside the conservation system unit does not follow section lines along the boundary of the conservation system unit. The validity of the selection outside such boundary shall not be adversely affected by the relinquishment.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIV, §1415, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2499.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Alaska Statehood Act as amended by this Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339 as amended by Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 96 Stat. 2371, which is set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of Title 16, Conservation, and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of title IX of Pub. L. 96–487 which comprises this chapter.
#### Margaret O’Connell, appellee, v. H. J. Eckert Drug Company, appellant.

Forcible detainer. Directed verdict for plaintiff. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Silas Cook, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Rehearing denied October 23, 1923.

Kramer, Kramer & Campbell and R. E. Costello, for appellant. Felsen & Kane, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### George W. Powers, as Assignee, etc., Respondent, *v.*Martin A. Smith et al., Appellants.

(Argued October 27, 1881;

decided November 22, 1881.)

*D. D. McKoon*for appellants.

*Alex. Thmn*for respondent.

Agree to affirm without opinion.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3221 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3221

      To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of insecticide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of insecticide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF INSECTICIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.06      Mixtures of         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         insecticide                                                        31/2008
                         containing Gamma-
                         Cyhalothrin ((S)-
                         a-cyano-3-
                         phenoxybenzyl (Z)-
                         (1R, 3R)-3-(2-
                         chloro-3,3,3-
                         trifluoropropenyl
                         )-2,2-
                         dimethylcycloprop
                         anecarboxylate)
                         as the active
                         ingredient and
                         application
                         adjuvants (CAS
                         No. 76703-62-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.10.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3269 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3269

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the International Organizations Immunities Act to provide for 
      the applicability of that Act to the Bank for International 
                              Settlements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS UNDER 
              THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IMMUNITIES ACT.

    The International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288 et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
    ``Sec. 17.
    The provisions of this title may be extended to the Bank for 
International Settlements in the same manner, to the same extent, and 
subject to the same conditions, as they may be extended to a public 
international organization in which the United States participates 
pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress 
authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such 
participation.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 6, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3269

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the International Organizations Immunities Act to provide for 
      the applicability of that Act to the Bank for International 
                              Settlements.
```
December 23, 2009 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Final Revisions to: the Requirements for Transboundary Shipments of 

Wastes between OECD Countries, the Requirements for Export Shipments 

of Spent Lead Acid Batteries, the Requirements on Submitting Exception 

Reports for Export Shipments of Hazardous Wastes, and the Requirements 

for Import Shipments of Hazardous Wastes 

FROM: Laura Coughlan 

 Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division 

 Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2005-0018 

The following copy of the final rule (“OECD-SLAB final rule 12.17.09 redline.pdf”) in 

the docket highlights the changes EPA made to the final rule document during and after 

review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from October through 

November 2009. The copy resulted from a comparison of the final version with the 

version provided to OMB for review. OMB approved the draft preamble, regulatory text, 

and economic analysis document without comment. None of the changes, therefore, 

were made as a result of OMB comments. Some changes to the regulatory text were 

made at the request of the Federal Register Office during their review of the text related 

to the incorporation by reference of the OECD Green and Amber waste lists. Other 

editorial changes were made independently by EPA. None of the changes impacted the 

economic analysis, and the version posted in the docket (“OECD-SLAB_Final Rule 

EA.pdf”) is identical to the version that OMB approved without comment.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. C09-01144 SI 

MARK E. MILLER (S.B. # 130200) markmiller@omm.com 

ANNE E. HUFFSMITH (S.B. # 236438) ahuffsmith@omm.com 

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3823 

Telephone: 415.984.8700 

Facsimile: 415.984.8701 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MICREL, INC. 

David N. Kuhn (State Bar #73389) 

Attorney-at-Law 

144 Hagar Avenue 

Piedmont, CA 94611 

Telephone: (510) 653-4983 

E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

GREGORY BENDER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GREGORY BENDER, 

Plaintiff and 

Counterdefendant,

v.

MICREL, INC., 

Defendant and 

Counterclaimant. 

Case No. C09-01144 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-01144-SI Document 42 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document37 Filed12/18/09 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER - 2 - CASE NO. C09-01144 SI 

WHEREAS the deadline for Micrel, Inc. to serve Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures is 

currently set for December 21, 2009 (D.E. 29); 

WHEREAS Micrel’s Motion to Strike or Compel Patent L.R. 3-1 Compliant Infringement 

Contentions is currently pending and will not be heard until February 12, 2010 (D.E. 30 and 36); 

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties hereby STIPULATE and 

AGREE that the deadline for Micrel to serve Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 Disclosures is the later of 

(a) 45 days after Bender serves infringement contentions that comply with Patent L.R. 3-1, OR 

(b) 14 days after the Court decides Micrel’s Motion To Strike or Compel Compliant Infringement 

Contentions. The subsequent Patent Local Rules deadlines will follow from the modified Patent 

L.R. 3-3 and 3-4 deadline. The declaration required by Civil Local Rule 6-2(a) is attached. (See

Huffsmith Declaration.) 

Dated: December 18, 2009 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Mark E. Miller

Mark E. Miller 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MICREL, INC.

Dated: December 18, 2009 By: /s/ David N. Kuhn 

David N. Kuhn 

Attorney-at-Law 

Counsel for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

GREGORY BENDER 

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of 

this document has been obtained from each of the above-listed signatories. 

Dated: December 18, 2009 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Anne E. Huffsmith

Anne E. Huffsmith 

O’Melveny & Myers LLP 

Counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant 

MICREL, INC. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED: 

Dated: _________________________ _____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Susan Illston 

 United States District Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-01144-SI Document 42 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01144-SI Document37 Filed12/18/09 Page2 of 2
§ 3.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 3.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2880 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2880

       To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,3 Dichlorobenzidine 
                            Dihydrochloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,3 Dichlorobenzidine 
                            Dihydrochloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,3 DICHLOROBENZIDINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.04       [1,1 Biphenyl] -   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         4,4 Diamino, 3,3                                                   31/2008
                         Dichloro,
                         Dihydrochloride
                         (CAS No. 612-83-
                         9) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2921.59.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:08-cv-04847-SI Document 71 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04847-SI Document 71 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04847-SI Document 71 Filed 06/15/10 Page 3 of 3
### §983. Lists and plats of lands, for governors of States

It shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Interior, to make accurate lists and plats of all such lands, and transmit the same to the governors of the several States in which such lands may lie, and at the request of the governor of any State in which said swamp and overflowed lands may be, to cause patents to be issued to said State therefor, conveying to said State the fee simple of said land.

The proceeds of said lands, whether from sale or by direct appropriation in kind, shall be applied exclusively, as far as necessary, to the reclaiming said lands, by means of levees and drains.

(R.S. §2480.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2480 derived from act Sept. 28, 1850, ch. 84, §2, 9 Stat. 519.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 589 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Both Equality California and No on Proposition 8,

Campaign for Marriage Equality, A Project of the American Civil

Liberties Union (the “ACLU”) shall, separately and not later than

February 22, 2010, serve and file a declaration identifying the

core group of individuals “engaged in the formulation of campaign

strategy and messaging.” Perry v Hollingsworth, -- F3d --, No 09-

17241 Slip op at 36 n 12 (9th Cir January 4, 2010). Each

organization’s declaration shall identify only those individuals

who were involved in that organization’s campaign; the declarations

should not include individuals or entities from other

organizations.

Equality California, the ACLU, Californians Against

Eliminating Basic Rights and the proponents should be prepared to

discuss the scope of the non-parties’ First Amendment privilege at

the hearing scheduled for February 25, 2010 at 2:30 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

JOSEPH C SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 589 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER II—FISHERMEN'S CONTINGENCY FUND
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3293 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet cyan 485 stage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on pro-jet cyan 485 stage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRO-JET CYAN 485 STAGE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.15.01 Copper phthalocyanine substituted with sulphonic acids 

and alkyl sulphonoamides, 

sodium salt (PMN No. P– 

99–105) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.14.30) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3293 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      45,705,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     262,999,579
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,999,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             304,168,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   271,283,376
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,483,234)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               304,168,956
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,416,283
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,760,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             402,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,640,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,640,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,640,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
<FN>
<F1>Current Assets and Current Liabilities are not separated to conform with
industry standards.
<F2>Income is from rental income. There are no Sales or Cost of Goods Sold.

</FN>
        



</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 1, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00299

- CV

Jared Everitt and Joseph Armand Ahouandjinou Imalet , Appellant s

v.

The Ultimate Drive

- In, LLC , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF T RAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED ON JO INT MOTION TO DISMISS

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an interlocutory appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on June 10, 2021

. The

p arties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion , the

Court agrees that the motion should be granted

. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and

dismiss es the appeal , and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings in

accor dance with the parties ’ settlement agreement

. Both parties shall bear all costs relating to

this appeal, both in this Court and i n the court below.
#### § 220.803 Effect of insurance endorsement.

From the date of initial endorsement, the Commissioner and the lender shall be bound by the provisions of this subpart to the same extent as if they had executed a contract including the provisions of this subpart and the applicable sections of the Act.