alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## AD Grid Sheet
Docket No.: FAA-2013-0828 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-036-AD AD Action: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) This action applies to Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes; and Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. ONCURRENCES

ANM-114

SIGNATURE (F irst Initial/Last Nan DATE

OUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (First Ini tial/Last Nan

OUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Na n

ATE OUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (F irst Initial/Last Nan

ATEI ,


## AD Grid Sbeet Docket No.: FAA-2013-0828 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-036-AD 

### AD Attion: 

### Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking 

### (SNPRM) This action applies to Airbus Model A330-200 

### and -300 

### series airplanes; and Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. If 

### this draft is acceptable, 

### please legibly sign 

### the grid 

### to the right wjth your first initial and fulll3$t name 

### to .show concurrence with 

### this AD.

) Al'F

# . .


## AD Grid Sheet
Docket No.: FAA-2013-0828 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-036-AD AD Action: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) This action applies to Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes; and Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial and full last name to show concurrence with this AD . I !CONCURRENCES ROUTING SYMBOL ANM-116VU

**r;;~;;;;;;**

**La tNam**  

# /)j 1' /iorf' ROUTING SYMBOL ANM-116RB

**rAb~** (Firs t Initial/Las t Nam

**·\~** DAr 

# /z7 lt4- ROUTif.IG SYMBOL SEAAEG

**~IGNATURE** (Fi rst Initi al/Las t Nam PATE ROUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE (First Initi al /Las t Nam DATE ROUTING SYMBOL SIGNATURE ( First Ini tial/Last Nam DATE ROUTING SYMBOL S I

GNATURE ( First Initi al / La st Nam DATE ROUTING SYMBOL S I

GNATURE (First Initi al /Last Nam PATE !ROUTING SYMBOL S I

GNATURE (Fi rst I nitia l / La st Nam DATE
2010 Addendum to Employment Agreement



THIS ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this "Addendum")
is made this 30th day of June, 2010 between Shengtai Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (the “Company”) and Qingtai
Liu (“Employee”)



WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered
into an Employment Agreement on July 8, 2009 (“Employment Agreement”);



WHEREAS, the Company was in need of cash
flow for its operations and development and the Employee agreed to reduce his salary under Section 4 of the Employment Agreement
from $120,000 to $107,676;



WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set
out the understanding reached between them in a written agreement;



NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that
in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree
as follows:



| | 1. | The annual salary of the Employee in fiscal year 2010 shall be $107,676.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                         

| | 2. | Except as otherwise specifically stated herein, the terms of the Employment Agreement (including
the exhibits thereto) shall remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



-- Signature page follows
--















IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.





|EMPLOYEE:
        
        
        
        /s/ Qingtai Liu________________________
        Qingtai Liu |  | SHENGTAI PHARMACEUITICAL, INC.
        
        
        By:
        /s/ Qingtai Liu_______________________
        Qingtai Liu
        Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John C. Houck, Jr., Respondent, v. Warner H. Bush et al., Doing Business as Bush’s Music & Radio House, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by an employer and carrier from an award of disability compensation. Appellants raise the questions of accident and causal relation. After an illness claimant was employed as a truck driver and service man for electrical appliances with the express understanding that he would not be required to do any heavy lifting. The employer provided two helpers who lifted heavy appliances while claimant only drove the truck and performed the service work. On May 7 and 8, 1959, one of the helpers was suffering from a hernia and claimant was obliged to do heavy lifting. On May 7 he helped lift a piano, and while doing so became nauseated, and on May 8 he helped lift and carry two heavy refrigerators, one down a flight of steps and the other up a flight of steps. He testified that he suffered chest pains during these activities, and upon his return home that night (May 8) the pains became very severe. The following *835morning, although he told his employer he did not feel well, he was sent to Geneva to repair a washing machine. While he was driving the truck he suffered a severe heart attack and asked a coemployee to drive him home, which was done. A doctor was called, he was hospitalized, and it was found that he had suffered a coronary occlusion. Appellants’ argument seems to be that because the final and disabling attack occurred while he was performing his usual duties of driving the truck and was not at the moment engaged in any unusual arduous work, that there was no accident. However, there is medical testimony that the lifting of the refrigerators and the piano on May 7 and 8 caused the coronary occlusion. Even the carrier’s medical witness conceded *“*that it is necessary to consider, at least the possibility of the exertion of those two days as being a final precipitating factor in the ultimate myocardial infarction.” Substantial evidence supports the award. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
- Front Matter
Information Page
Title Page
Citation Page
Table of Contents
Tables 
Figures
Acknowledgments

- Chapter 01 - Introduction
- Chapter 02 - Errors in Data Used to Estimate Infant and Child Mortality Rates
- Chapter 03 - Collection of DHS Infant and Child Mortality Data
- Chapter 04 - Sampling Errors
- Chapter 05 - Date-of-birth Data
- Chapter 06 - Age-at-death Data
- Chapter 07 - Completeness of Event Reporting
- Chapter 08 - Discussion and Recommendations
- References
- Appendix A - Calculation of Synthetic Cohort Probabilities of Death
- Appendix B - Reproduction Section of the DHS-II Core Questionnaire

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T01:37:22-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        [REDWOOD TRUST, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                 March 25, 2005

TO ALL PARTIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE A
ATTACHED HERETO:

            RE:   Sequoia HELOC Trust 2004-1, HELOC Asset Backed Notes;
                  Indenture dated as of June 1, 2004, between Sequoia HELOC
                  Trust 2004-1 and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
                  Association, as Indenture Trustee (the "Trustee"), (the
                  "Indenture"); Annual Statement as to Compliance by the Issuer

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      Pursuant to Section 3.9 of the Indenture with respect to the
above-referenced offering and in compliance with the requirements of TIA Section
314(a)(4), the undersigned officer of Redwood Trust, Inc. (the "Manager"), as
manager under the Management Agreement dated June 1, 2004 between Manager,
Sequoia HELOC Trust 2004-1 and the Trustee, hereby certifies as to the
following:

      1.    a review of the fulfillment by the Issuer of its obligations under
            the Indenture during the preceding fiscal year has been made under
            the direct supervision of the undersigned officer and to the best
            knowledge of the undersigned officer, based on such review, the
            Issuer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
            Indenture throughout the applicable period; and

      2.    there has been no known default in the fulfillment of the Issuer's
            material obligations throughout such period.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        SEQUOIA HELOC TRUST 2004-1

                                        By: Redwood Trust, Inc., as Manager

                                          /s/ John Isbrandtsen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: John Isbrandtsen
                                        Title: Vice President
<PAGE>


                                   SCHEDULE A

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Sixth Street and Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN  55479
Attention: Sequoia HELOC Trust 2004-1

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD  21045-1951
Attention: Sabrenia L. Fike

Moody's Investors Services
99 Church Street
New York, NY  10007

Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
55 Water Street
New York, NY  10041
Attention: Asset Backed Surveillance Department

Ambac Assurance Corporation
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attention:  Managing Director
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 13-1475

___________________________ Lucindo A. Mazariegos-Herrera; Dais y Mabel Mazariegos; Jason J.A. Mazariegos-Garcia; Benjamin Leiva Masariegos lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner s
v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ Submitted: November 20, 2013 Filed: December 5, 2013 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Lucindo Mazariegos-Herrera, his wifeDaisy Mazariegos, his son Jason Mazariegos-Garcia, and his uncle Benjamin Leiva Masariegos, citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of an order of the Boar d of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming an immigration judge’s denial of their re newed and consolidated applications forasylum and withholding of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the asylum applicati on of Mazariegos-Herrera and his derivative beneficiaries was barred as untimely filed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); Ngure v. Ashcroft , 367 F.3d 975, 988–89 (8th Cir. 2004). Af ter careful review, we conclude that the BIA’s denial of as ylum as to Leiva Masariegos—and its denial of withholding of removal as to all petitioners—was s upported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Cubillos v. Holder , 565 F.3d 1054, 1056 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review for denial of asylum); Menjivar v. Gonzales , 416 F.3d 918, 920–22 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of review for denial of withholding of removal; discussing “unwilling or unable to control” standard for non-gove rnmental persecution). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
#### § 891.625 Lease requirements.

The lease requirements are provided in § 891.425.
### §41110. Data collection

The Federal Maritime Commission shall publish on its website a calendar quarterly report that describes the total import and export tonnage and the total loaded and empty 20-foot equivalent units per vessel (making port in the United States, including any territory or possession of the United States) operated by each ocean common carrier covered under this chapter. Ocean common carriers under this chapter shall provide to the Commission all necessary information, as determined by the Commission, for completion of this report.

(Added Pub. L. 117–146, §9(a), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1277.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction

Pub. L. 117–146, §9(b), June 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1277, provided that: "Nothing in this section [enacting this section], and the amendment made by this section, shall be construed to compel the public disclosure of any confidential or proprietary data, in accordance with section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code."
Order entered July 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00940-CV

IN RE ZIMMER, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-03111-2011

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. The Court requests that real 

party in interest and respondent file their responses to the petition, if any, on or before August 4, 

2014.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Mine or Operating Name/MSHA Identification Number | Section 104 S&S Citations | Section 104(b) Orders | Section 104(d) Citations and Orders | Section 110(b)(2) Violations | Section 107(a) Orders | ProposedMSHAAssessments (1) | Mining Related Fatalities | Received Notice of Pattern of Violations Under Section 104(e) (yes/no) | Received Notice of Potential to Have Pattern Under Section 104(e) (yes/no) | Legal Actions Pending as of Last Day of Period | Legal Actions Initiated During Period | Legal Actions Resolved During Period |
| Morgan City Grinding Plant/1601357                          | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Argenta Mine and Mill/2601152                               | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | — |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corpus Christi Grinding Plant/4103112                       | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | $ | 176 |  | 0 | N | N | 0 | 0 | 0 |

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | Amounts included are the total dollar value of proposed assessments received from MSHA during the three months ended September 30, 2013, regardless of whether the assessment has been challenged or appealed.  Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are sometimes reduced in severity and amount, and sometimes dismissed.  The number of citations, orders, and proposed assessments vary by inspector and also vary depending on the size and type of the operation. |
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0131 SAT Date: 12/7/2012 Print Date: 4/1/2013
Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: P2REC: SAT: Do not forward; this substance poses a high hazard for Ecotoxicity Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,MM,L; LUNG; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0131 FATE: Estimations for log Kow = 0.35 (M) log Koc = 0.16 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)log Fish BAF = 0.04 (E) FATE: Estimations for typical log Kow = 7.35 (E) log Koc = 5.36 (E) log Fish BCF = 3.36 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.65 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = low PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl
Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed through the skin, p oor absorption from the GI tract; moderate absorption from the lung (analog). Concern for lung toxicity caused by interference with the surfactant balance of the lungs and irritation to eyes, lungs and mucous membranes from the
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 0.020 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.002 green algal 96-h EC50 0.001 fish

_ chronic value 0.001 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.001 algal

_ chronic value 0.001 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with molecular weight adjustment; (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,623,998
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         199,383
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,245,143
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 11,408,194
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     35,987,375
<ALLOWANCE>                                    437,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,593,110
<DEPOSITS>                                  44,828,969
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            355,943
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,900,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              55,593,110
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                819,876
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              176,176
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                32,395
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,028,447
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             494,429
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             535,342
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          493,105
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   62,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                465,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,601
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,732
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,732
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.18
<LOANS-NON>                                    127,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               377,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              438,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           438,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### § 300.1 Scope of chapter.

This chapter consists of general information and does not purport to set forth all of the procedures and requirements that apply to the operations of the Association. Complete specific information as to any aspect of such operations may be obtained from the office listed in § 300.9.
Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document193-1 Filed06/25/10 Page1 of 1

June 28, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document 194 Filed 06/28/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 582.400 Grant agreement. ( a ) *General.* The grant agreement will be between HUD and the recipient. HUD will hold the recipient responsible for the overall administration of the program, including overseeing any subrecipients or contractors. Under the grant agreement, the recipient must agree to operate the program in accordance with the provisions of this part and other applicable HUD regulations.
( b ) *Enforcement.* HUD will enforce the obligations in the grant agreement through such action as may be necessary, including recapturing assistance awarded under the program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,419
<SECURITIES>                                    38,818
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,138
<PP&E>                                         235,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,298
<BONDS>                                        171,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     119,770<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,540
<SALES>                                            343
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   349
<CGS>                                              343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,483<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,108)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Represents Total Partners' Capital
<F2>Net of equity in losses of affiliates and Interest income
<F3>$17,850 interest expense was capitalized.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>