alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Gladys Fannin, appellee, v. Edward Ingram, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,496.

Bastardy. Defendant found guilty. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William L. Morgan, Judge,' presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Ellis & Westbrooks, George W. Blackwell, Harris B. Gaines, James S. Winfrey, W. Chester Kitchen and Franklin A. Lovelace, for appellant; Bichard E. Westbrooks, of counsel.

Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, for appellee; Edward B. Wilson and Clyde C. Fisher, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel..

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 315 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 315

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
                             Courthouse''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 315

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Milton 
Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 8, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### HARNETT, Appellant, v. SMITH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 30, 1903.)

Action by Maurice Harnett against Clarence L. Smith.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132816 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132816 COA: 273381 Jackson CC: 05-001316-FH BRYAN ALLEN CARY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal to explore the issues presented by the Department of Corrections’ hand ling of sentencing credit for the reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v Conway , 474 Mich 1140 (2006).

M ARKMAN , J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in People v Wright , 474 Mich 1138 (2006).

d0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
### §390g. Groundwater recharge of aquifers; demonstration program

The Secretary of the Interior (hereinafter referred to as the "Secretary"), acting through the Bureau of Reclamation (hereinafter referred to as the "Bureau"), shall, in two phases, conduct an investigation of and establish demonstration projects for groundwater recharge of aquifers in the States of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming (such States to be hereinafter referred to as the "High Plains States") and in the other States referred to in section 391 of this title (hereinafter referred to as "other Reclamation Act States"), as provided by sections 390g to 390g–8 of this title: Provided, That funds made available pursuant to sections 390g to 390g–8 of this title shall not be used for the study or construction of groundwater recharge demonstration projects in the High Plains States and other Reclamation Act States which would utilize water originating in the drainage basin of the Great Lakes. The Bureau shall consult with the United States Geological Survey and other appropriate agencies and departments of the United States and of the High Plains States and other Reclamation Act States in order to carry out sections 390g to 390g–8 of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–434, §2, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1675.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–434, §1, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1675, provided: "That this Act [enacting sections 390g to 390g–8 of this title] may be cited as the 'High Plains States Groundwater Demonstration Program Act of 1983'."
```

[House Report 110-495]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    110-495

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
                                 RULES

                                _______
                                

 December 17, 2007.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Welch of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 876]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 876, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any resolution reported on or before the legislative day of 
December 19, 2007, providing for consideration or disposition 
of any of the following measures: (1) a bill relating to the 
Children's Health Insurance Program, or an amendment thereto; 
(2) a bill relating to Medicare, or an amendment thereto; (3) a 
bill relating to the alternative minimum tax, or an amendment 
thereto; (4) a joint resolution making further continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, or an amendment 
thereto; and (5) the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for 
the Department of State, foreign operations, and related 
programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for 
other purposes, or an amendment thereto.

                                  

```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, William A. Hartman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  October
      12, 2009
            /s/  William
      A. HartmanBy:  William
      A.  HartmanIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.15 Exemption for recreational vehicles. ( a ) *Exemption.* A recreational vehicle that meets the requirements of this section is exempt from 24 CFR parts 3280 and 3282.
( b ) *Definition.* A recreational vehicle is: ( 1 ) A vehicle or vehicular structure not certified as a manufactured home;
( 2 ) Designed only for recreational use and not as a primary residence or for permanent occupancy; and is either: ( i ) Built and certified in accordance with either NFPA 1192 (incorporated by reference, see § 3282.16) or ANSI A119.5 (incorporated by reference, see § 3282.16) as provided by paragraph (c) of this section; or
( ii ) Any vehicle which is self-propelled.
( c ) *Notice and certification requirements.* In order for the exemption to apply to an ANSI A119.5-15 certified recreational vehicle, a Manufacturer's Notice must be delivered to the consumer prior to the completion of the sales transaction. The Manufacturer's Notice must also be prominently displayed in a temporary manner in the kitchen (*i.e.,* countertop or exposed cabinet face). The Manufacturer's Notice must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) *Title of Manufacturer's Notice.* The title of the Manufacturer's Notice shall be “*****MANUFACTURER'S NOTICE*****” which shall be legible and typed using bold letters at least 1 inch in size.
( 2 ) *Content of Notice.* The content of the Manufacturer's Notice text shall be as follows: The Manufacturer of this unit certifies that it is a Park Model Recreational Vehicle designed only for recreational use, and not for use as a primary residence or for permanent occupancy. The manufacturer of this unit further certifies that this unit has been built in accordance with the ANSI A119.5-15 consensus standard for Park Model Recreational Vehicles.
( 3 ) *Text of Notice.* The text of the Manufacturer's Notice, aside from the Manufacturer's Notice's title shall be legible and typed using letters at least 1 ⁄ 2 inch in size.
( 4 ) *Removal of Manufacturer's Notice.* The Manufacturer's Notice shall not be removed by any party until the entire sales transaction has been completed.
( 5 ) *Completion of sales transaction.* A sales transaction with a Park Model Recreational Vehicle purchaser is considered completed when all the goods and services that the dealer agreed to provide at the time the contract was formed have been provided. Completion of a retail sale will be at the time the dealer completes installation of the Park Model Recreational Vehicle, if the dealer has agreed to provide the installation, or at the time the dealer delivers the recreational vehicle to a transporter, if the dealer has not agreed to transport or install the Park Model Recreational Vehicle. The sale is also complete upon delivery to the site if the dealer has not agreed to provide installation as completion of sale.
[83 FR 57688, Nov. 16, 2018]
### **CHAPTER 47—RECLAMATION TITLE TRANSFER**

Sec.
2901.
Purpose.
2902.
Definitions.
2903.
Authorization of transfers of title to eligible facilities.
2904.
Eligibility criteria.
2905.
Liability.
2906.
Benefits.
2907.
Compliance with other laws.
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### §§ 5.153-5.180 [Reserved]
Amendments to the existing Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association
of Ku6 Media Co., Ltd.
 
 Company
  A.
    
    Amendment to the existing Memorandum of AssociationThe authorized share capital of the Company be changed to US$600,000 divided into
12,000,000,000 ordinary shares of par value US$0.00005 each (the Change of Authorized Share
Capital), and Clause 6 of the Companys existing Memorandum of Association be deleted in its
entirety and substituting therefor the following new Clause 6:
 6.
    
    The share capital of the Company is US$600,000 divided into 12,000,000,000 ordinary
 shares of a nominal or par value of US$0.00005 each.
 B.
    
    Amendments to the existing Memorandum of Association and Articles of AssociationThe Companys existing Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association be amended to
change all references to the name of the Company in the existing Memorandum of Association and
Articles of Association to Ku6 Media Co., Ltd..C.
    
    Amendment to the existing Articles of AssociationThe following new Article 96(c) be inserted immediately after the existing Article 96(b) of the
Companys existing Articles of Association to clarify that the Companys directors shall be
re-elected annually:
 (c)
    
    Each Director who is elected at an annual general meeting of shareholders shall hold
office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders and until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier removal, or earlier
vacation of office pursuant to Article 94.Any Director appointed by the Board to fill a casual vacancy shall hold office only until
the first general meeting of the Company after his appointment and be subject to
re-election at such meeting. Any Director appointed by the Board as an addition to the
existing Board shall hold office only until the next following general meeting of the
Company and shall then be eligible for re-election.
  By:

/s/ Haifa ZhuName:
    Haifa Zhu
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant

 /

No. C 09-2668 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

In this action, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeks judicial review of a decision of the

Social Security Administration. By order filed January 28, 2010, plaintiff was directed to file

a motion for summary judgment no later than March 12, 2010. By order filed February 25,

2010, plaintiff was reminded of his obligation to file a motion for summary judgment no later

than March 12, 2010. To date, plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary judgment.

In the Court’s orders of January 28, 2010 and February 25, 2010, the Court advised

plaintiff that the instant action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute if plaintiff failed to

file a motion for summary judgment.

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later

than Friday, April 23, 2010, why the instant action should not be dismissed for failure to

prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. To show good

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 28 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

cause, plaintiff must file his motion for summary judgment, along with a declaration

explaining why such motion was not filed within the time required by the Court’s prior orders. 

Plaintiff’s response to the Court’s order to show cause must be served on defendant’s

counsel of record.

If plaintiff fails to show good cause in the manner set forth above, the Court will

dismiss the action for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 28 Filed 04/01/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Garcia, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 820]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistánce of appellate counsel, (1) a decision and order of this Court dated June 18, 2001 *(People v Garcia,*284 AD2d 479 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 26, 1998, and (2) a decision and order of this Court also dated June 18, 2001 *(People v Garcia,*284 AD2d 481 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the same court rendered January 21, 1999.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Miller, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.
### §719. Classification and numbering of publications ordered printed by Congress; designation of publications of departments; printing of committee hearings

Publications ordered printed by Congress, or either House, shall be in four series, namely:

one series of reports made by the committees of the Senate, to be known as Senate reports;

one series of reports made by the committees of the House of Representatives, to be known as House reports;

one series of documents other than reports of committees, the orders for printing which originate in the Senate, to be known as Senate documents; and

one series of documents other than committee reports, the orders for printing which originate in the House of Representatives, to be known as House documents.

The publications in each series shall be consecutively numbered, the numbers in each series continuing in unbroken sequence throughout the entire term of a Congress, but these provisions do not apply to the documents printed for the use of the Senate in executive session. Of the "usual number", the copies which are intended for distribution to State libraries and other designated depositories of annual or serial publications originating in or prepared by an executive department, bureau, office, commission, or board may not be numbered in the document or report series of either House of Congress, but shall be designated by title and bound as provided by section 738 of this title; and the departmental edition, if any, shall be printed concurrently with the "usual number." Hearings of committees may be printed as congressional documents only when specifically ordered by Congress or either House.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1250.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §142 (Jan. 15, 1908, No. 3, §1, 35 Stat. 565).
### **CHAPTER 89—SMALL VESSEL MANNING**

Sec.
8901.
Freight vessels.
8902.
Small passenger vessels.
8903.
Self-propelled, uninspected passenger vessels.
8904.
Towing vessels.
8905.
Exemptions.
8906.
Penalty.

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Chapter 89 provides for the manning of freight vessels, small passenger vessels, uninspected passenger vessels, and towing vessels. It permits a licensed operator to be in charge of a vessel in lieu of a licensed master or pilot. It also sets forth exemption and civil penalties.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1986**—Pub. L. 99–307, §1(14)(A), May 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 446, substituted "Self-propelled, uninspected" for "Uninspected" in item 8903.
### **CHAPTER 515—STATE MARITIME ACADEMY SUPPORT PROGRAM**

Sec.
51501.
General support program.
51502.
Detailing of personnel.
51503.
Regional maritime academies.
51504.
Use of training vessels.
51505.
Annual payments for maintenance and support.
51506.
Conditions to receiving payments and use of vessels.
51507.
Places of training.
51508.
Allowances for students.
51509.
Student incentive payment agreements.
51510.
Deferment of service obligation under student incentive payment agreements.
51511.
Midshipman status in the Navy Reserve.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2008**—Pub. L. 110–181, div. C, title XXXV, §3523(a)(1), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 598, substituted "Navy Reserve" for "Naval Reserve" in item 51511.
§ 241.540 Method of loan payment and amortization period. ( a ) *Monthly payments.* The loan shall provide for monthly payments on the first day of each month on account of interest and principal and shall provide for payment in accordance with the amortization plan as agreed upon by the borrower, the lender and the Commissioner.
( b ) *Amortization period.* ( 1 ) The loan shall have an amortization of either 5, 10, or 15 years by providing for either 60, 120, or 180 monthly amortization payments. No energy saving loan shall have an amortization period in excess of 15 years unless the amount of the loan exceeds $50,000.00, in which event the amortization period may be increased to 20 years, with a provision for 240 monthly amortization payments.
( 2 ) In any event, the loan shall have a maturity satisfactory to the Commissioner of not less than 2 or more than 20 years from the date of the beginning of amortization, or the Commissioner's estimate of the remaining economic life of the structure, whichever is the lesser.
( 3 ) The Commissioner shall establish the date of the first payment to principal, which shall be no later than the first day of the second month following the date of final endorsement (for projects involving insurance of advances) or endorsement (for projects involving insurance upon completion) of the loan for insurance.
```

                                                                                          Exhibit 99.2

                                        Report Of Independent
                                   Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors
Structured Obligations Corporation
New York, New York

We have examined the  compliance  of  Structured  Obligations  Corporation  (Depositor)  and U.S. Bank
National Association  (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT
2004-1 (the  Agreements)  relating to the  administration  of the  underlying  securities  and related
credit  support  deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended  December
31,  2007.  Depositor's  management  is  responsible  for  compliance  with  those  requirements.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.

Our  examination  was conducted in  accordance  with the  standards of the Public  Company  Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,  included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
Depositor's  and Trustee's  compliance  with those  requirements  described  above and performing such
other  procedures as we considered  necessary in the  circumstances.  We believe that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination  does not provide a legal  determination
of Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion,  Depositor  and Trustee  complied,  in all material  respects,  with the  requirements
described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2007.

This report is intended  solely for the  information and use  of Structured  Obligations  Corporation,
U.S. Bank National  Association,  and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and
is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.

/s/ RubinBrown LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
February 20, 2008
```

----