alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §11505. Disposal of forfeitures

(a) Money, property, and wages forfeited under this chapter for desertion may be applied to compensate the owner or master of the vessel for expenses caused by the desertion. The balance shall be transferred to the appropriate district court of the United States when the voyage is completed.

(b) If it appears to the district court that the forfeiture was imposed properly, the property transferred may be sold in the same manner prescribed for the disposition of the property of deceased seamen. The court shall deposit in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts the proceeds of the sale and any money and wages transferred to the court.

(c) When an owner or master fails to transfer the balance as required under subsection (a) of this section, the owner or master is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of 2 times the amount of the balance, recoverable by the Secretary in the same manner that seaman's wages are recovered.

(d) In all other cases of forfeiture of wages, the forfeiture shall be for the benefit of the owner of the vessel.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 584; Pub. L. 103–206, title IV, §421, Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2438.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11505 | 46:706 |

Section 11505 provides for the disposal of wages forfeited by deserting seamen.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–206, §421(1), substituted "The balance shall be transferred to the appropriate district court of the United States when the voyage is completed." for "The balance shall be transferred to the Secretary when the voyage is completed, as prescribed by the Secretary."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–206, §421(2), struck out at beginning "Within one month of receiving the balance under subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary shall transfer the balance to the appropriate district court of the United States."
Exhibit 31.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification of the Type Described in Rule13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

Chief Executive Officer Certification of the Annual Financial Statements

I,
David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of Sealy Mattress Corporation, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sealy Mattress Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:



Date:
February 28, 2005

| |  | /s/DAVID J. MCILQUHAM                                                   
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                                         
| |  | David J. McIlquham
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

---
DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF 

A SUBSTITUTE TO THE TAX PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5204, 

THE “STOP TAXING DEATH AND DISABILITY ACT” 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute modifies H.R. 5204 by altering 

the effective date of the proposal. Under the Chairman’s amendment, the proposal applies to 

loans discharged after December 31, 2016. 

The following presents the estimated Federal fiscal year budget effects of the Chairman’s 

amendment: 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] [1] [2] 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26 

 

-16 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -8 -9 -8 -47 -88 

NOTE: Details do not add to totals due to rounding. 

[1] Estimate provided by the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office. 

[2] Estimate includes the following outlay effects: 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26 

 

10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 19 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

September 13, 2016 

JCX-81-16
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Clay C. Williams, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.The certification is given to the knowledge of the undersigned.         By:  */s/ Clay C. Williams*    Name: Clay C. Williams    Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  May 7, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and will be retained by National Oilwell Varco, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
29
Orderentered October
,, 2012

In The 

## Qtourtoftppcat flit!, itrlctofZ!Icxa at aUa No. 05-12-00358-CR LOIS NELL MAURICE JERKINS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the CriminalDistrict CourtNo. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-61508-I 

### ORDER The Court REINSTATES this appeal. On August 2, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding the date appellant delivered his pro se notice of appeal to Texas Department of Criminal Justice authorities for mailing and whether appellant desires to pursue the appeal. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) Tammy Shelby, Supervisor ofthe Mail System Coordinators Panel, checked the records for February through March 2012; (2) Ms. Shelby found no record ofwhen appellant delivered his notice ofappeal to prison authorities for mailing; (3) appellant’s notice ofappeal
was post-marked March 7, 2012 and was filed-stamped March 13, 2012; and (4) there is no indication appellant filed his notice ofappeal by February 21, 2012.The Courtwill dispose ofthe appeal indue course.

/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of ZAGG Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert G. Pedersen II,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


**/s/
                ROBERT G. PEDERSEN II**Robert
                G. Pedersen IIChief
                Executive OfficerMarch
                27, 2008
1 John T. B oyd, C hief J ustic e (R et.), Se ven th C ourt o f Ap pea ls, sitting b y ass ignm ent. T EX . G O V ’ T

C ODE A NN . §75 .002 (a)(1 ) (Ve rnon Sup p. 20 04). NO. 07-04-0074-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E MARCH 9, 2 004

______________________________ IN THE INTEREST O F J.S.B. AND M.C.B., C HILDREN

_________________________________ FROM THE 2 86TH DI STRICT COURT OF HO CKLEY COUNT Y; NO. 95-03-16,111; HON. HAROLD PHELAN, PRES IDING

_______________________________ MEMORAN

DUM OPINI

ON

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., an d BOYD, S.J. 1 A p pellant

Phillip Edw

ard Barnes file d a notice of appeal o n February 23, 2004. However, he did not pay the $125 filing fee required from appellants under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. An affidavit of indigence was filed in the trial court on February 27, 2004, per Texas Rule of Appellate Proce dure 20.1, but it was contes ted. Furthermore , the contest was upheld. By letter from this Cour

t dated Februar

y 24, 200 4, we informed appellant

that “the fili ng fee in the amount of $1 25.00 has not been pai d . . . . Fai lure to pay the filing fee w ithin ten (10) days from the dat e of this notice may result in a dismissal. ” T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Ent

erprises , 990 S.W .2d 756 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d). The deadline laps ed, and the fee was not receiv ed.2

Because appellant has fail ed to pay the requis ite filing fee as directed by the court, we dismis s the appeal purs uant to Texas R ule of Appellate Pr ocedure 42.3(c)

. Per Curiam
#### GENEVA NAT. BANK, Respondent, v. GRAHAM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

Action by the Geneva National Bank against James Graham, impleaded, etc.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed with $10 costs and disbursements. This renders the decision of motion to dismiss appeal unnecessary.

SPRING and HISCOCK, JJ., dissenting.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                              |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/    JOSEPH E. ROBERT,
JR.
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  | Name:                        |  | Joseph E. Robert, Jr.                            
|                      |  | Title:                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC,

Plaintiff(s),

    v.

ALEX HAHN et al,

Defendant(s).                                                                      /

No. C 09-2534 MHP

ORDER(Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on

opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the

settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be

restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: 3/22/2010MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02534-MHP   Document 19   Filed 03/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T02:13:35-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 81.63 Annual Housing Activities Report.

To comply with the requirements in sections 309(n) of the Fannie Mae Charter Act and 307(f) of the Freddie Mac Act and assist the Secretary in preparing the Secretary's Annual Report to Congress, each GSE shall submit to the Secretary an AHAR including the information listed in those sections of the Charter Acts and as provided in § 81.43(a) of this part. Each GSE shall submit such report within 75 days after the end of each calendar year, to the Secretary the Committee on Banking and Financial Services of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate. Each GSE shall make its AHAR available to the public at its principal and regional offices. Before making any such report available to the public, the GSE may exclude from the report any information that the Secretary has deemed proprietary under subpart F of this part.
#### § 203.249 Effect of amendments.

The regulations in this subpart may be amended by the Secretary at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, but such amendment will not adversely affect the interests of a mortgagee under the contract of insurance on any mortgage or loan already insured, and will not adversely affect the interest of a mortgagee on any mortgage or loan to be insured for which either the Direct Endorsement or Lender Insurance mortgagee has approved the mortgagor and all terms and conditions of the mortgage or loan, or the Secretary has issued a firm commitment. In addition, such amendment will not adversely affect the eligibility of specific property if such property is covered by a conditional commitment issued by the Secretary, a certificate of reasonable value issued by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or an appraisal report approved by a Direct Endorsement or Lender Insurance underwriter.

[62 FR 30226, June 2, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 16603 and # 16604; California Disaster Number CA-00325]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 9.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of California (FEMA—4558—DR), dated 08/22/2020.

*Incident:*                         Wildfires.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/14/2020 through 09/26/2020.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 11/21/2020.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/11/2020.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/24/2021.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of California, dated 08/22/2020, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 12/11/2020.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Cynthia Pitts,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2020-26663 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
§ 902.1 Purpose, scope, and general matters. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS) is to improve the delivery of services in public housing and enhance trust in the public housing system among public housing agencies (PHAs), public housing residents, and the general public, by providing a management tool for effectively and fairly measuring the performance of a PHA in essential housing operations of projects, on a program-wide basis and individual project basis, and providing rewards for high performers and remedial requirements for poor performers.
( b ) *Scope.* PHAS is a strategic measure of the essential housing operations of projects and PHAs. PHAS does not evaluate the compliance of a project or PHA with every HUD-wide or program-specific requirement or objective. Although not specifically evaluated through PHAS, PHAs are responsible for complying with nondiscrimination and equal opportunity requirements, including but not limited to those specified in 24 CFR 5.105, for affirmatively furthering fair housing, requirements under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), and requirements of other federal programs under which the PHA is receiving assistance. A PHA's adherence to these requirements will be monitored in accordance with the applicable program regulations and the PHA's Annual Contributions Contract (ACC).
( c ) *PHAS indicators.* HUD will assess and score the performance of projects and PHAs based on the indicators, which are more fully addressed in § 902.9: Physical condition, financial condition, management operations, and the Capital Fund program.
( d ) *Assessment tools.* HUD will make use of uniform and objective criteria for the physical inspection of projects and PHAs and the financial assessment of projects and PHAs, and will use data from appropriate agency data systems to assess management operations. For the Capital Fund program indicator, HUD will use information provided in the electronic Line of Credit Control System (eLOCCS), the Public Housing Information Center (PIC), or their successor systems. On the basis of this data, HUD will assess and score the results, advise PHAs of their scores, and identify low-scoring and poor-performing projects and PHAs so that these projects and PHAs will receive the appropriate attention and assistance.
( e ) *Small PHAs.* A PHA with fewer than 250 units that does not convert to asset management will be considered as one project by HUD.
( f ) HUD's s*coring procedures* will be published from time to time in the Federal Register for public comment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         364,379
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         198,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,861,712
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 12,469,454
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     15,230,531
<ALLOWANCE>                                    184,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,684,104
<DEPOSITS>                                  22,673,982
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            179,080
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,823,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              30,684,104
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                904,085
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              440,869
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               166,443
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,511,397
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             651,751
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             651,751
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          859,646
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   84,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              20,557
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                828,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,748
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     104,748
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   104,748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.46
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               101,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              185,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           185,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00138-CV 

IN RE REGINALD DALE PETERS RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 8, 2014

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).