alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3558. Effect on existing law

Nothing in this subchapter, section 11331 of title 40, or section 20 of the National Standards 1 and Technology Act (15 U.S.C. 278g–3) may be construed as affecting the authority of the President, the Office of Management and Budget or the Director thereof, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or the head of any agency, with respect to the authorized use or disclosure of information, including with regard to the protection of personal privacy under section 552a of title 5, the disclosure of information under section 552 of title 5, the management and disposition of records under chapters 2 29, 31, or 33 of title 44, the management of information resources under subchapter I of chapter 35 of this title, or the disclosure of information to the Congress or the Comptroller General of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 113–283, §2(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3084.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in sections 3538 and 3549 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 113–283.

1 So in original. Probably should be "National Institute of Standards".

2 So in original. Probably should be "chapter".
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/15/2011 03:47 PM 

Subject: Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 - RIA Ch 9 

Hi Bob, 

 

Attached are the interagency comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA. Please 

let me know if there are questions or if we need to set up a call to talk 

about this chapter. 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
§ 103.315 Relief sought for aggrieved persons. ( a ) The following types of relief may be sought for aggrieved persons in conciliation: ( 1 ) Monetary relief in the form of damages, including damages caused by humiliation or embarrassment, and attorney fees;
( 2 ) Other equitable relief including, but not limited to, access to the dwelling at issue, or to a comparable dwelling, the provision of services or facilities in connection with a dwelling, or other specific relief; or
( 3 ) Injunctive relief appropriate to the elimination of discriminatory housing practices affecting the aggrieved person or other persons.
( b ) The conciliation agreement may provide for binding arbitration of the dispute arising from the complaint. Arbitration may award appropriate relief as described in paragraph (a) of this section. The aggrieved person and the respondent may, in the conciliation agreement, limit the types of relief that may be awarded under binding arbitration.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

03BA048W.B07.ZP02 - Plt Blanco’s Ex Parte App to Exceed 15-Page Limitation on Reply Brief (Order Granting)

(C 09-02780 SI)

-1-

Randall L. Wiens - State Bar Number 105326

LAW OFFICES OF RANDALL L. WIENS

1007 - 7th Street, Suite 500

Sacramento, California 95814

Office: (916) 446-1900

Facsimile: (916) 446-1919

E-Mail: “randall@wienslaw.com”

Attorneys for Plaintiff James A. Blanco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JAMES A. BLANCO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FORENSIC

SCIENCES; and DOES 1-20,

Defendants.

/

Case No. C 09-02780 SI

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF JAMES

A BLANCO’S EX PARTE APPLICATION

FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED 15-PAGE

LIMITATION ON PLAINTIFF’S REPLY

BRIEF ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Date: January 14, 2010

Time: not applicable

Dept.: 10

Judge: Honorable Susan Illston

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and defendant AAFS having no objection, plaintiff James

A. Blanco’s ex parte application for leave to exceed the 15-page limit on plaintiff’s reply to

defendant’s opposition to plaintiff’s January 29, 2010 motion for preliminary injunction is granted.

Plaintiff is permitted to file a reply brief up to 25 pages in length.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________________ ______________________________________

 Judge of the District Court

Case3:09-cv-02780-SI Document30-1 Filed01/14/10 Page1 of 1 Case 3:09-cv-02780-SI Document 33 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 1
### §11503. Duties of consular officers related to insubordination

(a) A consular officer shall use every means to discountenance insubordination on vessels of the United States, including employing the aid of local authorities.

(b) When a seaman is accused of insubordination, a consular officer shall inquire into the facts and proceed as provided in section 11106 of this title. If the consular officer discharges the seaman, the officer shall endorse the agreement required by this part and enter in the vessel's official logbook the cause and particulars of the discharge.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 583.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11503 | 46:703 |

Section 11503 delegates to consular officers certain responsibilities related to insubordination of seamen on United States vessels.
### §390h–12l. Hi-Desert Water District in Yucca Valley, California wastewater collection and reuse facility

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the appropriate State and local authorities, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Hi-Desert Water District in Yucca Valley, California wastewater collection and reuse facility.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation or maintenance of a project described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1626, as added Pub. L. 104–266, §2(a)(2), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3293.)
### §8434. Injunctions and other equitable relief

Whenever it appears to the Secretary that any person has engaged, is engaged, or is about to engage in acts or practices constituting a violation of this chapter, or any rule or order thereunder, a civil action,1 may be brought, in accordance with section 7192(c) of this title, in the appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin such acts or practices, and, upon a proper showing, the court shall grant, without bond, mandatory or prohibitive injunctive relief, including interim equitable relief.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title VII, §724, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3335.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

1 So in original. The comma probably should not appear.
EX-10.2


  Exhibit 10.2

  EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

  	This Executive Employment Agreement Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made as of November 7, 2022, by and among Precision BioSciences, Inc. (the “Company”) and the individual whose name appears on the signature page hereto (the “Executive”).  Except as set forth in this Amendment, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (as defined below).

  WITNESSETH

  	WHEREAS, the Executive previously entered into an executive employment agreement with the Company (the “Employment Agreement”); and

  	WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company each desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

  	NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Company hereby agree to the following:

  1.Amendment to the Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following to the definition of “Good Reason” set forth in Section 4.4:


  “a material, adverse change in Executive’s title, authority, duties, or responsibilities (other than temporarily while the Executive is physically or mentally incapacitated or as required by applicable law), provided that this shall not apply following an acquisition of or merger by the Company if Executive is provided with similar title, responsibilities, duties and authority in a larger organization, but only with respect to the business of the Company and its subsidiaries;”

  2.No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect according to its terms.


  3.Entire Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Employment Agreement (to the extent not amended hereby), represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede any and all previous contracts, arrangements or understandings between the parties.


  [signature page follows]

   

   

   

   

  |

  

   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

  PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC.

   

   

  By: /s/ Michael Amoroso

  Name: Michael Amoroso

  Title: Chief Executive Officer

   

   

  EXECUTIVE

   

   

  /s/ John Alexander Kelly

  John Alexander Kelly

   

   

   

   

   

  |
§ 700.140 Participatory agreement. ( a ) Before actual acceptance into CHSP, potential participants must work with the PAC and the service coordinator in developing supportive services case plans. A participant has the option of accepting any of the services under the case plan.
( b ) Once the plan is approved by the PAC and the program participant, the participant must sign a participatory agreement governing the utilization of the plan's supportive services and the payment of supportive services fees. The grantee annually must renegotiate the agreement with the participant.
**KFS** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0221 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR. ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of ti me, and good cause appearing therefore , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including August 11 , 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 6 2022

07/06/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0221
(Republished)

#### St. Regis Paper Company, Appellant, v. John L. Rayward, Doing Business as Rayward Associates, et al., Respondents.

Order entered on April 6, 1961 unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of dismissing the counterclaim, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. The order of this court entered on March 27, 1962 is vacated. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
### §485j. Effect on existing laws

The provisions of previous Acts of Congress not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter shall remain in full force and effect.

(Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 418, §16, 53 Stat. 1198.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Construction With Other Laws

Act Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 418, §18, 53 Stat. 1198, provided that: "Nothing in this Act [see section 485k of this title] shall be construed to amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act (45 Stat. 1057), as amended [section 617 et seq. of this title]."
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GERLY ALVAREZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10574

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00074-LRH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Gerly Alvarez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a

deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

AUG 01 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10574

Alvarez contends that the district court imposed a substantively

unreasonable sentence in light of his mitigating factors, namely his troubled youth,

strides towards rehabilitation, and the minor nature and age of his prior

convictions. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Alvarez’s

sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence at the

bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the

fact that Alvarez’s offense involved an attempt to smuggle illegal aliens across the

border. See id.

AFFIRMED.
§ 35.910 Notices and pamphlet. ( a ) *Notices.* In cases where evaluation or hazard reduction or both are undertaken as part of federally funded rehabilitation, the grantee or participating jurisdiction shall provide a notice to occupants in accordance with § 35.125. A visual assessment alone is not considered an evaluation for the purposes of this part.
( b ) *Lead hazard information pamphlet.* The grantee or participating jurisdiction shall provide the lead hazard information pamphlet in accordance with § 35.130.
[69 FR 34272, June 21, 2004]
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

34 36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000

18 12 06 00 07/11 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 11 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
#### Theodore Witz, appellee, v. Vera Linek and Louise Linek, appellants.

Gen. No. 28,376.

Trover for violin. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. J. Fred Gilster, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Soelke & Johnson, for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 330.30 GNMA Guaranty. ( a ) *Securities held by Depositories.* Ownership of multiclass securities registered in the name of a Depository shall be conclusively established by registration in the name of the Depository as owner on the books and records of the Multiclass Registrar, and it shall be unnecessary for a Depository to maintain custody of any physical certificates evidencing such ownership.
( b ) *Guaranty.* The Association's guaranty is a guaranty that payment will be made to the registered owner of securities as reflected on the books and records of the Multiclass Registrar. ( 1 ) The Association makes no other guaranty, including any guaranty that a Depository will appropriately credit payments to beneficial owners of GNMA multiclass securities. The Association's guarantee of securities payable to a Depository or its nominee becomes effective when the Depository or its nominee is registered as the registered owner of the securities on the books and records of the Multiclass Registrar.
( 2 ) The Association guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest as provided by the terms of the multiclass security. The Association's guaranty is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
[66 FR 44266, Aug. 22, 2001]
#### § 291.440 Recordkeeping requirements.

Each lessee must establish and maintain sufficient records to enable the Secretary to determine whether the requirements of this subpart have been met. This includes, where available, racial, ethnic, gender, and disability status data on the applicants for, and beneficiaries of, this homeless initiative.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 2502-0412)

[61 FR 55716, Oct. 28, 1996]
#### M. M. Jones, appellee, v. Cyrus H. McCormick et al., trustees of the Chicago Stock Exchange Building, appellants

Gen. No. 27,696.

Action of trover. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo Pam, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Reversed and cause remanded.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Rankin, Lustfield & Landise, for appellants; Ode L. Rankin and Ralph R. Roberts, of counsel. William M. Lawton, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### **CHAPTER 123—NUMBERING UNDOCUMENTED VESSELS**

Sec.
12301.
Numbering vessels.
12302.
Standard numbering system.
12303.
Exemption from numbering requirements.
12304.
Certificates of numbers.
12305.
Displaying numbers.
12306.
Safety certificates.
12307.
Regulations on numbering and fees.
12308.
Providing vessel numbering and registration information.
12309.
Penalties.
#### In the Matter of Augustus S. Hutchins, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal from decree entered December 8, 1961 granted, with $10 costs, *618unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to he served and filed on or before April 16, 1962, with notice of argument for the May 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to foe argued or submitted when reached. Respondents’ points are to be served and filed on or before April 30, 1962. Motion to dismiss appeal from order entered October 25, 1961 granted in view of the appeal from the decree, entered on December 8, 1961. The appellants are directed to file the requisite security for costs as required by section 298 of the Surrogate’s Act within 10 days from the date of entry of the order herein. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §10603. Seaman's duty to notify employer regarding illness, disability, and injury

(a) A seaman on a fishing vessel, fish processing vessel, or fish tender vessel shall notify the master or individual in charge of the vessel or other agent of the employer regarding any illness, disability, or injury suffered by the seaman when in service to the vessel not later than seven days after the date on which the illness, disability, or injury arose.

(b) The Secretary shall prescribe regulations requiring that each fishing vessel, fish processing vessel, and fish tender vessel shall have on board a placard displayed in a prominent location accessible to the crew describing the seaman's duty under subsection (a) of this section.

(Pub. L. 100–424, §6(a), Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1592.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10603 | New |
EXHIBIT 14

                                 Code of Ethics

Conflicts of Interest Policy Overview

Artcraft V, Inc. ("Artcraft") recognizes and respects that officers and
employees may take part in legitimate financial, business and other activities
outside their jobs. However, those activities must be lawful and free of
conflicts with their responsibilities as Artcraft employees.

Employees must not misuse Artcraft resources or discredit Artcraft's name and
reputation. The effectiveness of this policy depends on the cooperation of all
employees in disclosing any situations that may be contrary to the intent of the
policy and the ethical standards that it expresses.

Core Ethical Requirements:

o    Disclose outside activities, financial interests or relationships that may
     present a possible conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict.
     Make your disclosures in writing to your supervisor as well as to company
     legal counsel. When in doubt as to whether a possible conflict of interest
     exists, err on the side of disclosure.

o    In addition to complying with the law and Artcraft policies, exercise your
     own good judgment in all personal and business dealings outside your
     Artcraft job.

o    Avoid actions or relationships which might conflict or appear to conflict
     with your job responsibilities or the interests of Artcraft.

o    Do not misuse Artcraft resources, intellectual property, time or facilities
     (including office equipment, e-mail, and computer applications).

o    Obtain necessary approvals before accepting any position as an officer or
     director of an outside business concern.

What Artcraft Officers and Employees Are Urged To Watch For:

o    Holding a financial interest in a company where you could personally affect
     Artcraft's business with that company.

o    Taking a part-time job where you may be tempted to spend time on that job
     during your normal Artcraft working hours or to use Artcraft equipment or
     materials.

o    Receiving gifts of greater than nominal value from suppliers, customers or
     competitors while you are in a position to influence Artcraft decisions
     that might affect or appear to affect the outside concern.

o    Receiving personal discounts or other benefits from suppliers, service
     providers or customers not available to the general public or similarly
     situated Artcraft employees.

o    Directing business to a supplier that is owned or managed by a relative or
     close friend.

o    Misusing Artcraft resources, your position or influence to promote or
     assist an outside business or not-for-profit activity.

o    Preferential hiring of, direct supervision of, or making a promotion
     decision about a spouse, relative or close personal friend.

o    A romantic or other personal relationship that may create a conflict of
     interest with the employee's Artcraft responsibilities or compromise
     company interests
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00139-CV

VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Dennis B. GILLETT, WPM Construction Services, Inc., Clark-Hunt JV, Clark Construction 

Group, LLC, and Hunt Construction Group, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-00934

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 11, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal asserting it no longer desires to prosecute 

the appeal because the matter had been resolved. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties 

regarding the assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM