alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE NO. CV-09:2744 SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668) 

E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com 

Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407) 

E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com 

David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174) 

E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com 

Christopher T. Varas (Bar No. 257080) 

E-Mail: cvaras@kmwlaw.com 

KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP 

9720 Wilshire Boulevard 

Penthouse Suite 

Beverly Hills, California 90212 

Telephone: (310) 248-3830 

Facsimile: (310) 860-0363 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC. 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LINDA GREENE; NATHAN WIPF; 

CHADWICK MARTIN; SHADI 

ABDULSALAM; MICHAEL RUTHERFORD, 

A/K/A KEREM AZER; ALEXANDRU 

MIHALACHE; CELINO STOIAN; VICTOR 

GHENADI; LUCIAN IONESCU; ANDRZEJ 

KOPJAS, A/K/A PAUL GYONGYOSI, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. CV-09:2744 SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

3/$,17,))¶6027,21)25

$77251(<6¶)((6$1'&2676AS TO 

DEFENDANT ANDRZEJ KOPJAS, A/K/A 

PAUL GYONGYOSI 

 

Case 3:09-cv-02744-SI Document 93 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

CASE NO. CV-09:2744 SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

THE COURT has considered Plaintiff Zynga Game NetZRUN,QF¶V3=\QJD¶V ́0RWLRQIRU

$WWRUQH\V¶)HHVDQG&RVWVDVWR'HIHQGDQW$QGU]HM.RSMDVDND3DXO*\RQJ\RVLWKH30RWLRQ ́

the supporting declaration of Christopher Varas, and all other pleadings and other papers on file in 

this matter. Pursuant to 86&DDQGWKLV&RXUW¶V'HIDXOW-XGJPHQWDVWR'HIHQGDQW

Andrzej Kopjas, a/k/a Paul Gyongyosi, entered on April 27, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

THAT: 

Within ten (10) days of service of this Order, which service shall be deemed to have occurred 

on date of entry of this Order, Defendant Andrzej Kopjas, a/k/a Paul Gyongyosi shall pay to Zynga 

$22,495 IRU=\QJD¶VUHDVRQDEOHDWWRUQH\V¶IHHV and $749 in costs incurred by Zynga in bringing this 

action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

ENTERED THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2010 

 _____________________________________ 

 The Honorable Susan Illston, 

 United States District Court Judge 

 

23rd June

Case 3:09-cv-02744-SI Document 93 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3071 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3071

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2005

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, 
   Deputy Executive Directors, and General Counsel of the Office of 
                Compliance to serve one additional term.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING CURRENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE 
              DIRECTORS, AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE TO 
              SERVE ONE ADDITIONAL TERM.

    (a) Executive Director.--Notwithstanding section 302(a)(3) of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)), the 
individual serving as Executive Director of the Office of Compliance as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve one additional term.
    (b) Deputy Executive Directors.--Notwithstanding section 302(b)(2) 
of such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(b)(2)), any individual serving as a Deputy 
Executive Director of the Office of Compliance as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act may serve one additional term.
    (c) General Counsel.--Notwithstanding section 302(c)(5) of such Act 
(2 U.S.C. 1382(c)(5)), the individual serving as General Counsel of the 
Office of Compliance as of the date of the enactment of this Act may 
serve one additional term.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC

(09-CV-02664-WHA)

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CSBN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

NATALIE K. WIGHT (ORBN 35576)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: 415.436.6937

Facsimile: 415.436.7234

Email: natalie.wight@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for United States of America

EDGAR EUGENE PAGE (CSBN 231147)

KATHLEEN C. PAGE (CSBN 233040)

Page & Page Attorneys at Law

Post Office Box 2837

San Francisco, CA 94126

Telephone: 415.986.4558

Facsimile: 415.986.4566

Email: pagepagelaw@comcast.net

Attorneys for the Claimant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ONE HEWLETT PACKARD PAVILION

LAPTOP (SERIAL NO. CNF75237NC),

ADAPTOR, AND VISUAL DEPICTIONS

ON THE HARD DRIVE,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-CV-02664-WHA

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

CONTINUE STAY AND 

RESCHEDULE CMC

The United States and counsel for the Claimant hereby request to continue the Stay of the civil

forfeiture proceedings, as ordered by the Court on September 21, 2009, while the related criminal

action, Case No. 09-CR-00946-JSW, is still pending. Accordingly, the parties request that the

Court vacate the Case Management Conference scheduled for March 18, 2010, at 

Case 3:09-cv-02664-WHA Document 25 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE CMC

(09-CV-02664-WHA) 2

11:00 a.m., and reschedule the Case Management Conference for July 15, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. or

as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard by the Court. 

STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:

DATED: March 10, 2010 __________/S______________________

NATALIE K. WIGHT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: March 10, 2010 __________/S______________________

EDGAR EUGENE PAGE

Attorney for Claimant Andrew Hanson

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, the Case

Management Conference scheduled for Thursday March 18, 2010, is hereby vacated. The Case

Management Conference is rescheduled for _______________________________________;

with a Joint Status Report due to the Court by _____________________________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________ __________________________________

DATED WILLIAM ALSUP

United States District Judge

July 15, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. noon on July 8, 2010 March 15, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02664-WHA Document 25 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00027-CV

Style: Tory House, et al. v. The O’Quinn Law Firm, John M. O’Quinn & 

Associates, L.L.P., and T. Gerald Treece as Independent Executor of

the Estate of John M. O’Quinn, Deceased

Date motion filed*: October 23, 2014

Type of motions: Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record

Parties filing motions: Appellees The O’Quinn Law Firm and John M. O’Quinn &

Associates, L.L.P.’s counsel Mike O’Brien

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motions are:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The motion to withdraw as counsel for the above appellees, construed as a motion 

for substitution because it states that the law firm of McFall, Breitbeil & Eidman, 

PC, will remain as appellees’ counsel, is denied without prejudice as currently 

filed as the McFall firm has yet to file notices of appearances in this Court. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 6.2, 6.5(d). If counsel Mike O’Brien files a motion for substitution

that complies with Rules 6.5(d) and 6.2, this Court will reconsider such a motion.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: October 30, 2014
No. 99-40916

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40916 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ALONSO GARZA-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-99-CR-229-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose

Alonso Garza-Gonzalez (Garza) has requested leave to withdraw as

counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garza has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         670,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,531
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               958,841
<PP&E>                                       1,475,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                 436,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,025,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          452,290
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,992
<COMMON>                                         5,781
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,465,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,025,729
<SALES>                                        188,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,824,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               159,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,302
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,764,050)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,764,050)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
§ 3286.9 Manufacturer shipment responsibilities. ( a ) *Providing information to HUD.* At or before the time that each manufactured home is shipped by a manufacturer, the manufacturer must provide HUD, through the Production Inspection Primary Inspection Agency (IPIA), in accordance with § 3282.552 of this chapter, with information, as applicable, about: ( 1 ) The serial number and manufacturer's certification label number of the home;
( 2 ) The manufacturer of the home; and
( 3 ) The name and address of the retailer or distributor that has arranged for the home to be shipped.
( b ) *Manufacturer's installation instructions.* The manufacturer is required to provide with each manufactured home, installation designs and instructions for the installation of the manufactured home that have been approved by a DAPIA. A DAPIA must give approval only if the installation designs and instructions provide equal or greater protection than the protection provided under the installation standards.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SANMATEO HOTEL EMPLOYEES, etal.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

LADY LUCK GOURMET LLC, aLimited Liability Co., dbaGO BISTRO,

Defendant.

))))))))))))))

No. C09-1544 BZ

ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT

In view of the Report and Recommendation dated 

March 17, 2010, the clerk shall REASSIGN the above-captioned

case immediately to a United States District Judge. 

Dated: March 17, 2010

         Bernard Zimmerman 

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\BD. OF TRUSTEES V. LADY LUCK GOURMET\REASSIGNMENT.ORD.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01544-SI   Document 33   Filed 03/17/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T10:18:36-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

Re:	Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2004-NC5 (the "Trust"),
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-NC5, issued pursuant
to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2004 (the
"Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and among Morgan Stanley ABS
Capital I Inc., as depositor, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as trustee (the "Trustee"), Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP,
as servicer (the "Servicer"), and NC Capital Corporation,
as responsible party

I, Craig Phillips, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (the "Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the
Trust;

(2) Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this Annual
Report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, for inclusion in the Reports is
included in the Reports;

(4) Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the
Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, and except as disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement;
and

(5) The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, that is included in the Reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
the Trustee and the Servicer.

Date:	March 24, 2005
/s/: Craig Phillips
Craig Phillips
President
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IASIS Healthcare LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ David R. WhiteDavid R. WhiteChairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER III—NORTHEAST CORRIDOR PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
§ 55.9 Identifying wetlands. The following process shall be followed in making the wetlands determination: ( a ) HUD or the responsible entity shall determine whether the action involves new construction that is located in or impacts a wetland.
( b ) As primary screening, HUD or the responsible entity shall verify whether the project area is located in proximity to wetlands identified on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and assess the site for visual indication of the presence of wetlands such as hydrology (water), hydric soils, or wetland vegetation. Where the primary screening is inconclusive, potential wetlands should be further evaluated using one or more of the following methods: ( 1 ) Consultation with the Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), for information concerning the location, boundaries, scale, and classification of wetlands within the area.
( 2 ) Reference to the Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) National Soil Survey (NSS), and any Tribal, State, or local information concerning the location, boundaries, scale, and classification of wetlands within the action area and further site study by the environmental review preparer with reference to Federal guidance on field identification of the biological (rather than jurisdictional) characteristics of wetlands.
( 3 ) Evaluation by a qualified wetlands scientist to delineate the wetland boundaries on site.
[89 FR 30906, Apr. 23, 2024]
### §30306. Foreign cause of action

When a cause of action exists under the law of a foreign country for death by wrongful act, neglect, or default on the high seas, a civil action in admiralty may be brought in a court of the United States based on the foreign cause of action, without abatement of the amount for which recovery is authorized.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1511.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30306 | 46 App.:764. | Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, §4, 41 Stat. 537. |

Section

The words "a civil action in admiralty may be brought in a court of the United States based on the foreign cause of action" are substituted for "such right may be maintained in an appropriate action in admiralty in the courts of the United States" for clarity and consistency. The words "any statute of the United States to the contrary notwithstanding" are omitted as unnecessary.
1

The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1963

___________

Darwin Butler, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

The Curators of the University *

of Missouri, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 3, 2002

 Filed: October 21, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Darwin Butler appeals the district court’s1

 order granting defendant’s motion

to enforce a settlement. Upon careful review of the record, we reject Mr. Butler’s

argument that the lien asserted by the Division of Child Support Enforcement
-2-

(“Division”) was not perfected. The Division filed proper notice under Mo. Rev. Stat.

§ 454.505 thereby perfecting a lien on Mr. Butler’s settlement proceeds.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order enforcing the settlement agreement.

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3149 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3149

To withdraw the Los Padres National Forest in California from location, 
      entry, and patent under mining laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

 Mrs. Capps (for herself and Mr. Farr) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To withdraw the Los Padres National Forest in California from location, 
      entry, and patent under mining laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF LOS PADRES NATIONAL FOREST, CALIFORNIA, FROM 
              MINING LAWS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Los Padres 
National Forest Conservation Act''.
    (b) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Los Padres 
National Forest in California is hereby withdrawn from--
            (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and disposal under 
        the public land laws;
            (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining laws; and
            (3) operation of the mineral leasing, mineral materials, 
        and geothermal leasing laws.
                                 <all>
```