alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4101. Application

This chapter applies to an uninspected vessel not subject to chapter 45 of this title—

(1) on the navigable waters of the United States; or

(2) owned in the United States and operating on the high seas.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 528; Pub. L. 100–424, §8(b), Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1593.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 4101 | 46:526u |

Section 4101 makes this chapter applicable to uninspected vessels, as defined in section 2101(43), that operate on the navigable waters of the United States or that are owned in the United States and while operating on the high seas. Therefore a vessel that operates on waters that are considered to be solely State waters would not be subject to these Federal requirements.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–424 inserted "not subject to chapter 45 of this title" after "an uninspected vessel".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Chapter effective Apr. 15, 1984, see section 2(g)(1) of Pub. L. 98–89, set out as a note under section 3101 of this title.
#### § 35.315 Risk assessment.

Each owner shall complete a risk assessment in accordance with 40 CFR 745.227(d). Each risk assessment shall be completed in accordance with the schedule established by the Federal agency.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY LIONEL WHITE,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO;

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-2901 SI (pr)

JUDGMENT

This action is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff filing a new action if his criminal

conviction is ever set aside. 

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: February 9, 2010 _______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02901-SI Document 8 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 1
(April 19, 2007)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sherese Hoover, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy K. Webber, J.), rendered on or about October 21, 2004, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
§ 202.11 Title I. ( a ) *Types of administrative action.* In addition to termination of the Contract of Insurance, certain sanctions may be imposed under the Title I program. The administrative actions that may be applied are set forth in 24 CFR part 25. Civil money penalties may be imposed against Title I lenders and mortgagees pursuant to 24 CFR part 30.
( b ) *Grounds for action.* Administrative actions shall be based upon both the grounds set forth in 24 CFR part 25 and as follows: ( 1 ) Failure to properly supervise and monitor dealers under the provisions of part 201 of this title;
( 2 ) Exhaustion of the general insurance reserve established under part 201 of this title;
( 3 ) Maintenance of a Title I claims/loan ratio representing an unacceptable risk to the Department; or
( 4 ) Transfer of a Title I loan to a party that does not have a valid Title I Contract of Insurance.
[75 FR 20734, Apr. 20, 2010]
H. R. 326

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To amend the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area Act of 2000 to adjust the 

boundary of the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. YUMA CROSSING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA BOUNDARY 

ADJUSTMENT. 

Section 3(b) of the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area 

Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106–319; 114 Stat. 

1281) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(b) BOUNDARIES.—The Heritage Area shall comprise the lands 

generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Yuma Crossing National 

Heritage Area Boundary Adjustment’, numbered 903–80071, and 

dated October 16, 2005.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                                                Three Months                  Six Months
                                                                    Ended                       Ended
                                                            ---------------------      ---------------------
                                                            June 28,     June 29,      June 28,     June 29,
                                                              1998         1997          1998         1997
                                                            ---------------------      ---------------------
<S>                                                         <C>         <C>            <C>          <C>

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Average shares outstanding - Basic                            5,787        5,054          5,785       5,059

Shares issuable upon the exercise of
  outstanding stock options and warrants                        170          115            148         121
                                                            ---------------------      ---------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted                 5,957        5,169          5,933       5,180
                                                            =====================      =====================
Net income                                                   $1,290       $  841         $2,458      $1,686
                                                            =====================      =====================
Net income per share - Basic                                  $0.22        $0.17          $0.42       $0.33
                                                            =====================      =====================
Net income per share - Diluted                                $0.22        $0.16          $0.41       $0.33
                                                            =====================      =====================
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VITECH
AMERICA, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,087,839
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,892,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,037,054
<INVENTORY>                                     32,184,017
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,650,154
<PP&E>                                          24,565,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                     798,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,323,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,746,870
<BONDS>                                         13,535,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        72,385,718
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,345,159)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,323,727
<SALES>                                         22,560,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,560,161
<CGS>                                           15,052,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,232,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,857,563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     14,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 14,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        14,850
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.001


</TABLE>
### Water-Quality Data for the Lower Russian River Basin, Sonoma County, California, 2003-2004

By: Robert Anders**Karl DavidekKathryn M. Koczot**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds168

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John J. Zavaro, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed March 10, 1976. Sentence affirmed. No opinion. Titone, J. P., Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur; Hawkins, J., concurs in the result on constraint of the decision in *People v Felder*(61 AD2d 309).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          18,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  832,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,867
<INVENTORY>                                    848,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,796,395
<PP&E>                                       1,569,010
<DEPRECIATION>                                 950,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,360,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          601,059
<BONDS>                                        729,061
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          145,176
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,578,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,360,231
<SALES>                                        548,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               808,620
<CGS>                                          322,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  659,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,284
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 83,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (12,079)
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 85198 

# FILED NOV 1 0 2U22 BOBBIE PRICE; SUZANNE LOVELY; AND BRADLEYBAILEY, Appellants, vs. LORENYOUNGMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; EMMANUEL BARRIENTOS;AND BELEM CAZARES, Respondents. srOWN EME COURI

ORDERDISMISSINGAPPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motionfor summaryjudgmentinanactionrelatingtorealproperty. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Christy L. Craig, Judge.

Respondents Emmanuel Barrientos and Belem Cazares (hereinafter Barrientos) have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Barrientos assertsthat the challenged order is not appealable under NRAP 3 because their claims against Wayne Grimes and Tri-State Collection & Foreclosure Services, LLC, remain pending. It appears the challenged order resolves the claims against Tri-State Collection & Foreclosure Services where the order states that all interests ofTri-State Collection & Foreclosure Services, LLC have been terminated as the result of the foreclosure sale. However, it does not appear that the order resolves the claims against Grimes. Accordingly, it does not appear that the order is appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) ("[A] finaljudgment is
one that disposesofall the issuespresented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (01 1947A ceW3r.., 

# - CZ - 

# 35

-co7-such as attorney's fees and costs."). And no other statute or court rule

appears to authorize an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, this court lacksjurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

Sr. J. Pickering Gi bons

cc: Hon. Christy L. Craig, District Judge Bobbie Price Bradley Bailey Suzanne Lovely Loren Youngman Law Offices ofMichael F. Bohn, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

'Appellants may file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a finaljudgment resolving all claims asserted in the district court. The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this matter under a general order ofassignment.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
101 I947A <WO. 2
Exhibit
23.1









Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Forms S-8 (Reg. Nos. 333-143963,
333-143962, and 333-141537) of MISCOR Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries of our report
dated March 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MISCOR
Group, Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, which appears
in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of MISCOR Group, Ltd. and
Subsidiaries.







/s/
      ASHER & COMPANY, Ltd.





Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania


March
28, 2008
### §1721. Exchange of documents by heads of departments

Heads of departments may exchange surplus documents for other documents and books required by them, when it is to the advantage of the public service.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1282.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §93 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §95, 28 Stat. 623).
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: For revisions and amendments affecting Schedules A, B, C, and D, issued under part 888, but not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 888.115 Fair market rents for existing housing: Manner of publication. ( a ) *Publication of FMRs.* FMRs will be published at least annually by HUD on the World Wide Web, or in any other manner specified by the Secretary. HUD will publish a notice announcing the publication of the FMRs in the Federal Register, to be effective October 1 of each year, and provide for a minimum of 30 days of public comments and requested for reevaluation of the FMRs in a jurisdiction. The FMRs will become effective no earlier than 30 days after the date the notice publishes in the Federal Register (*e.g.*, if HUD fails to publish FMRs 30 days before October 1, the effective date will be 30 days after publication), except for areas where HUD receives comments during the minimum 30-day comment period requesting reevaluation of the FMRs in a jurisdiction. After HUD reviews a request for reevaluation, HUD will post on the World Wide Web the final FMRs for the areas that have been reevaluated and publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the publication and the effective date.
( b ) *Changes in methodology.* HUD will publish for comment in the Federal Register a document proposing material changes in the method for estimating FMRs and shall respond to public comment on the proposed material changes in the subsequent Federal Register document announcing the availability of new FMRs based on the revised method for estimating FMRs.
[81 FR 80581, Nov. 16, 2016]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Appellate case name: Holly Brooke Schaumleffel v. GS/TPRF III Houston Med. 

Ctr., LP

Appellate case number: 01-18-00516-CV

Trial court case number: 1110670

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

This Court’s September 5, 2018 Memorandum Order of Referral to Mediation 

(“Mediation Order”) had referred this appeal to mediation. On the same day, the Clerk of 

this Court’s September 5, 2018 notice had granted the appellant’s motion for an extension 

of time to file her brief until October 4, 2018. After appellee filed its objection to the 

Mediation Order on September 7, 2018, this Court’s September 12, 2018 Order withdrew 

the Mediation Order. On October 8, 2018, appellant’s brief was filed.

On October 12, 2018, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution. Appellee contends that this appeal should be dismissed for appellant’s failure 

“to timely comply with almost all appellate deadline(s) set by this Honorable Court” under 

Rule 42.3(c), or for appellant’s failure to timely file a brief and for failing to reasonably 

explain the failure, under Rule 38.8(a)(1). In the alternative, because appellee contends 

that appellant’s brief, filed on October 8, 2018, three business days after the deadline, 

constitutes a frivolous appeal, appellee requests that it should be awarded damages, under 

Rule 45. Appellant has filed a response.

Accordingly, because appellant’s brief was filed on October 8, 2018, the Court 

DENIES the appellee’s motion to dismiss and request for damages. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(2), 45. Appellee’s brief remains due by November 7, 2018.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: October 23, 2018 ______________________
§ 1003.500 Responsibility for grant administration. ( a ) One or more tribal departments or authorities, including existing tribal public agencies, may be designated by the chief executive officer of the grantee to undertake activities assisted by this part. A public agency so designated shall be subject to the same requirements as are applicable to subrecipients.
( b ) The grantee is responsible for ensuring that ICDBG funds are used in accordance with all program requirements. The use of designated public agencies, subrecipients, or contractors does not relieve the grantee of this responsibility. The grantee is also responsible for determining the adequacy of performance under subrecipient agreements and procurement contracts, and for taking appropriate action when performance problems arise, such as the actions described in § 1003.701.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-121434 on Form S-8of our reports dated March 7, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Great WolfResorts, Inc. and subsidiaries and the combined financial statements of Great Lakes Predecessor(which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123R, *Share-Based Payment*, on January 1, 2006, as described inNote 13) and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingappearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2006.     /s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP     Milwaukee, Wisconsin     March 7, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than December 21, 2020.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Chris P. Wangen, Assistant 
Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:
    1. MoCorp, Inc. Iron River, Michigan; to retain voting shares of 
MSB Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
The Miners State Bank, also of Iron River, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 1, 
2020.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-26739 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P