alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 573.5 Underwriting standards and availability of loan guarantee assistance. ( a ) HUD may, in its discretion, accept the underwriting standards of the Financial Institution making a loan to a Borrower.
( b ) HUD will not make the loan guarantee unless it determines that the guaranteed loan is an acceptable financial risk under HUD's generally applicable loan underwriting standards based on the following: ( 1 ) The Borrower's ability to pay debt service; and
( 2 ) The value of the collateral assigned or pledged as security for the repayment of the loan.
( c ) The provision of a loan guarantee to a Financial Institution and the amount of the guarantee do not depend in any way on the purpose, function, or identity of the organization to which the Financial Institution has made, or intends to make, a Section 4 Guaranteed Loan.
( d ) HUD may disapprove a request for loan guarantee assistance based on the availability of funding.
( e ) HUD may decline any Financial Institution's participation if its underwriting criteria are insufficient to make the guarantee an acceptable financial risk, or if the proposed interest rates or fees are unacceptable. HUD expects the proposed interest rates to take into account the value of the Federal guarantee.
( f ) HUD may limit the availability of Guaranteed Loan Funds to geographic areas having the greatest need, as determined by a needs analysis of the most current available date conducted by HUD.
( g ) Other requirements associated with the underwriting standards and guidelines shall be contained in the Loan Guarantee Agreement.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRA INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NEW YORK LIFE INVESTMENT

MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-01609 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION

IN LIMINE NO. 2

After reviewing the documents submitted by counsel pertaining to defendant’s motion in

limine number two, the Court rules as follows:

1. The New York Life document entitled “Strength and Safety for Uncertain Times,

Annual Report 2007” will be admitted in part under FRE 807. The parts so admitted are: (i) from

the paragraph beginning on page NYLIM4522 starting with “More than a year before the credit

crisis emerged . . . ” through to the end of that column, (ii) the paragraph on page NYLIM4524

beginning with “Elected as a new director in 2007 . . . ,” and (iii) the special report by Gary

Wendlandt appended thereto on pages NYLIM4526–29 in its entirety. Possibly other rules of

evidence would permit these portions to be admitted as well.

2. For the same reasons, the New York Life document denoted “Plaintiff’s Exhibit

102,” which appears to be a deposition exhibit, entitled “New York Life Avoids the Risks, Clients

Case 3:09-cv-01609-WHA Document 157 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Reap the Rewards” will be admitted in its entirety under FRE 807. Again, possibly other rules of

evidence would permit this document to be admitted as well.

With respect to the remainder of materials, the Court is unclear why they would be

relevant or admissible. The parties shall ensure that these rulings are incorporated into the joint

summary of rulings on all the motions in limine addressed at today’s pretrial conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01609-WHA Document 157 Filed 05/24/10 Page 2 of 2
### §2209. Disclosure requirement for official business conducted using non-official electronic messaging accounts

(a) In General.—The President, the Vice President, or a covered employee may not create or send a Presidential or Vice Presidential record using a non-official electronic message account unless the President, Vice President, or covered employee—

(1) copies an official electronic messaging account of the President, Vice President, or covered employee in the original creation or transmission of the Presidential record or Vice Presidential record; or

(2) forwards a complete copy of the Presidential or Vice Presidential record to an official electronic messaging account of the President, Vice President, or covered employee not later than 20 days after the original creation or transmission of the Presidential or Vice Presidential record.

(b) Adverse Actions.—The intentional violation of subsection (a) by a covered employee (including any rules, regulations, or other implementing guidelines), as determined by the appropriate supervisor, shall be a basis for disciplinary action in accordance with subchapter I, II, or V of chapter 75 of title 5, as the case may be.

(c) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) Covered employee.—The term "covered employee" means—

(A) the immediate staff of the President;

(B) the immediate staff of the Vice President;

(C) a unit or individual of the Executive Office of the President whose function is to advise and assist the President; and

(D) a unit or individual of the Office of the Vice President whose function is to advise and assist the Vice President.

(2) Electronic messages.—The term "electronic messages" means electronic mail and other electronic messaging systems that are used for purposes of communicating between individuals.

(3) Electronic messaging account.—The term "electronic messaging account" means any account that sends electronic messages.

(Added Pub. L. 113–187, §2(e)(1), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2006.)
#### § 9.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency. The agency shall make such information available to such persons in such manner as the Secretary finds necessary to apprise them of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this part. All publications and recruitment materials distributed to participants, beneficiaries, applicants or employees shall include a statement that the agency does not discriminate on the basis of disability. The notice shall include the name of the person or office responsible for the implementation of section 504.
§ 902.60 Data collection. ( a ) *Fiscal year reporting period—limitation on changes after PHAS effective date.* To allow for a period of consistent assessments to refine and make necessary adjustments to PHAS, a PHA is not permitted to change its fiscal year for the first 3 full fiscal years following the effective date of this regulation, unless such change is approved by HUD for good cause.
( b ) *Request for extension of time to submit unaudited financial information.* In the event of extenuating circumstances, a PHA may request extensions of time to submit its unaudited financial information. To receive an extension, a PHA must ensure that HUD receives the extension request electronically 15 days before the submission due date. The PHA's electronic extension request must include an objectively verifiable justification as to why the PHA cannot submit the information by the submission due date. PHAs shall submit their requests for extensions of time for the submission of unaudited financial information through the FASS-PH Secure Systems Web site. HUD shall forward its determination electronically to the requesting PHA.
( c ) *Request for waiver of due date for PHA submission of audited financial information.* ( 1 ) HUD, for good cause, may grant PHAs a waiver of the due date of the submission of audited financial information to HUD. HUD shall consider written requests from PHAs for a waiver of the report submission due date (established by the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, as no later than 9 months after the end of the fiscal year). The PHA's written request for a waiver of the due date of the submission of audited financial information must include an objectively verifiable justification as to why the PHA cannot submit the information by the submission due date. A PHA shall submit its written request for such a waiver, 30 days prior to the submission due date, to its local field office. HUD shall forward its written determination of the waiver request to the PHA and, if appropriate, establish a new submission due date for the audited financial information.
( 2 ) A waiver of the due date for the submission of audited financial information to HUD does not relieve a PHA of its responsibility to submit its audited information to OMB's Federal Audit Clearinghouse no later than 9 months after the end of its fiscal year.
( d ) *Rejected unaudited financial submissions.* When HUD rejects a PHA's year-end unaudited financial information after the due date, a PHA shall have 15 days from the date of the rejection to resubmit the information without a penalty being applied, in accordance with § 902.62.
( e ) *Late points and late presumptive failure.* Late points and late presumptive failure will only be applied to the financial condition indicator since the management operations information is derived from the financial condition submission.
( f ) *Score change.* A management operations score can change as a result of the audited submission since the management operations information is derived from the financial condition submission.
[76 FR 10149, Feb. 23, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 75941, Dec. 7, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1 Certificate:

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORT

OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.

I, the undersigned, being the one of the co-chief executive officers, respectively, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 3, 2007



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Tim R. Sensenig              
|Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer
### §386. Application of excess-land provisions of reclamation laws to certain lands

The excess-land provisions of the Federal reclamation laws shall not be applicable to lands which on June 16, 1938, had an irrigation water supply from sources other than a Federal reclamation project and which will receive a supplemental supply from the Colorado-Big Thompson project.

(June 16, 1938, ch. 485, 52 Stat. 764.)
#### §§ 55.27-55.28 [Reserved]
#### McAVOY, Respondent, v. PRESS PUB. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Thomas F. McAvoy against the Press Publishing Company. J. W. Gerard, for appellant. J. V. McAvoy, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Hugh Miller, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                at the dates and for the periods
                indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:  May
      10,
      2007








/s/
      Hugh
      Miller


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________






Hugh
      Miller


*President
      and Chief Executive Officer*
#### Worumbo Company, appellee, v. A. Feirstein, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,137.

Action on contract for sale of woolen goods. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. C. N. Hollerich, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

*654Charles L. Cohns, for appellant. Moses, Rosenthal & Kennedy, for appellee; Kirsch E. Soble, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 10.2

       

      JOINDER AGREEMENT

       

      This Joinder Agreement (the “Joinder Agreement”) is made and entered into
        as of November 4, 2022 by the undersigned with respect to that certain Letter Agreement, dated November 17, 2021 (the “Letter Agreement”), delivered by bleuacacia sponsor
        LLC and the executive officers, directors and senior advisors of bleuacacia ltd (the “Company”) to the Company. Capitalized terms used herein without definition are used
        as defined in the Letter Agreement.

       

      By executing this Joinder Agreement, the undersigned hereby agrees, as of the date first set forth above, that the undersigned shall become a party to
        the Letter Agreement and shall be bound by, and entitled to the rights provided under, the terms and provisions of the Letter Agreement as an Insider (as applicable and as defined therein).

       

      This Joinder Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. The parties hereto (i) all
        agree that any action, proceeding, claim or dispute arising out of, or relating in any way to, this Joinder Agreement shall be brought and enforced in the courts of New York City, in the State of New York, and irrevocably submit to such
        jurisdiction and venue, which jurisdiction and venue shall be exclusive and (ii) waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and venue or that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.

       

      [Signature page follows]

       

      
        
          


      

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Joinder Agreement as of the date written above.

       

      	 	
              By:

            	
               /s/ Kat Peeler

            
	 	 	
              Name: Kat Peeler

            


      

      

      	
              Acknowledged and Agreed:

              bleuacacia ltd

               

              

            
	
              By:

            	
               /s/ Thomas Northover

            	 
	 	
              Name: Thomas Northover

            	 
	 	
              Title: Executive Director

            	 


      

      

      [Signature Page to Joinder to Letter Agreement]
§ 882.411 Payments for vacancies. ( a ) *Vacancies from execution of Contract to initial occupancy.* If a Contract unit which has been rehabilitated in accordance with this Program is not leased within 15 days of the effective date of the Contract, the Owner will be entitled to housing assistance payments in the amount of 80 percent of the Contract Rent for the unit for a vacancy period not exceeding 60 days from the effective date of the Contract, provided that the Owner ( 1 ) has complied with §§ 882.506(d) and 882.508(c);
( 2 ) has taken and continues to take all feasible actions to fill the vacancy; and
( 3 ) has not rejected any eligible applicant except for good cause acceptable to the PHA.
( b ) *Vacancies after initial occupancy.* ( 1 ) If an Eligible Family vacates its unit (other than as a result of action by the Owner which is in violation of the Lease or the Contract or any applicable law), the Owner may receive the housing assistance payments due under the Contract for so much of the month in which the Family vacates the unit as the unit remains vacant. Should the unit continue to remain vacant, the Owner may receive from the PHA a housing assistance payment in the amount of 80 percent of the Contract Rent for a vacancy period not exceeding an additional month. However, if the Owner collects any of the Family's share of the rent for this period, the payment must be reduced to an amount which, when added to the Family's payment, does not exceed 80 percent of the Contract Rent. Any such excess must be reimbursed by the Owner to the PHA. The Owner will not be entitled to any payment under this paragraph (b)(1) of this section unless the Owner: ( i ) Immediately upon learning of the vacancy, has notified the PHA of the vacancy or prospective vacancy, and
( ii ) has taken and continues to take all feasible actions specified in paragraphs (a) (2) and (3) of this section.
( 2 ) If the Owner evicts an Eligible Family, the Owner will not be entitled to any payment under paragraph (b)(1) of this section unless the PHA determines that the Owner complied with all requirements of the Contract.
( c ) *Prohibition of double compensation for vacancies.* The Owner will not be entitled to housing assistance payments with respect to vacant units under this section if the Owner is entitled to payments from other sources (for example, payments for losses of rental income incurred for holding units vacant for relocatees pursuant to Title I of the HCD Act of 1974 or payments for unpaid rent under § 882.414 (Security and Utility Deposits)).
[47 FR 34379, Aug. 9, 1982, as amended at 63 FR 23855, Apr. 30, 1998]
Document

Exhibit 10.2


									
	Investors	Investment
(RMB)	Share Percentage
	Hainan Qixin	5,000,000	0.16%
	Suzhou Saixiang	82,500,000	2.58
§ 3286.703 Failure to comply. ( a ) *Penalties and injunctive relief.* Failure to comply with the requirements of this part is a prohibited act under section 610(a)(7) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 5409(a). Any person who fails to comply with the requirements of this part is subject to civil and criminal penalties, and to actions for injunctive relief, in accordance with sections 611 and 612 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 5410 and 5411.
( b ) *Presentation of views.* When practicable, the Secretary will provide notice to any person against whom an action for injunctive relief is contemplated and will afford such person an opportunity to request a presentation of views. The procedures set forth in §§ 3282.152 through 3282.154 of this chapter shall apply to each request to present views and to each presentation of views authorized in accordance with this section.
( c ) *Investigations.* The procedures for investigations and investigational proceedings are set forth in part 3800 of this chapter.
§ 1007.15 Eligible uses. ( a ) *In general.* A loan guaranteed under this part may only be used to construct, acquire, or rehabilitate eligible housing.
( b ) *Construction advances.* Advances made by the lender during construction are eligible if: ( 1 ) The mortgagor and the mortgagee execute a building loan agreement, approved by HUD, setting forth the terms and conditions under which advances will be made;
( 2 ) The advances are made only as provided in the building loan agreement;
( 3 ) The principal amount of the mortgage is held by the mortgagee in an interest bearing account, trust, or escrow for the benefit of the mortgagor, pending advancement to the mortgagor or to his or her creditors as provided in the loan agreement; and
( 4 ) The mortgage bears interest on the amount advanced to the mortgagor or to his or her creditors and on the amount held in an account or trust for the benefit of the mortgagor.
#### WILKERSON, Adm'r, *vs.*McDOUGAL.

[detinue eob slates.]

1. *Detinue for slaves; when emancipation no defense to.*— To an action of detinue for the *recovery*of slaves, commenced in 1852, it is no defense that the slaves were emancipated before the trial.

2. *Same; what wül defeat action.*— In such action, the plaintiff’s right of recovery is defeated by the passage of his title to another before the trial, unless the defendant is a mere trespasser ; but not by its extinction on account of the destruction of the property, whether by death, emancipation or otherwise.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Eussell.

Tried before Hon. Littleberry Strange.

This suit was commenced in March, 1852, and was an action of detinue for the recovery of slaves, by the appellant against the appellee. It lingered by successive continuances until the fall term of the court in 1869, when the defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that slavery having been abolished in the State, the plaintiff can not recover. This demurrer was sustained, and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant. The sole question for consideration is the sufficiency of the demurrer.

Hooper, for appellant.

Stone & Clopton, *contra.*

B. *F.*SAFFOLD, J.

The matter of demurrer ought to have been pleaded *puis darrein continuance.*But we will consider its sufficiency as a defense.

It is conceded that the destruction of the property would not affect the question of recovery. The point is made, that the plaintiff’s title to the slaves failed before the trial, *518and therefore he is not entitled to a judgment for the specific property, or its value. The defendant may defeat the action in these particulars, by showing a superior title in a third person, with which he connects his own, whether it existed prior to the commencement of the suit, or was obtained afte*rwards.—*Cole *v. Conoly,*16 Ala. 271; *Dozier v. Joyce,*8 Por. 303.

Why is it that the plaintiff’s-right of recovery is unimpaired by the death or destruction of the property, but effaced by a superior outstanding title ? Perhaps there is no good reason for the difference. One which may be assigned is, that the governing principle is not the divestiture of his right, but the passage of it to another, who’thereby acquires a cause of action. The defendant is not to be placed in any better or worse condition. The. cause of action continues, but is transferred. The discovered owner and the defendant may adjust their controversy as they choose. The plaintiff would be accountable to the former, if allowed to recover, and a multiplicity of suits would be avoided. When the property is destroyed, the defendant’s accountability, none the less in either case, is only to the plaintiff. The owner might not have lost his property, if injury had not been done to his possession of it, and the wrong-doer must not be allowed to take any advantage from his wrong. The defense is not *sufficient.*—Rose *v. Pearson,*41 Ala. 687; *McElvain v. Mudd,*44 Ala. 48.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Peters, J.

I assent to the judgment of reversal, but not to the reasons on which it is founded.