Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 1, 2020 / Notices 77159 

11 Id., 77 FR at 8103. 

12See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

specific ad valorem or per-unit 

assessment rate is not zero or de 

minimis, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

collect the appropriate duties at the time 

of liquidation. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis, or an 

importer-specific ad valorem or per-unit 

assessment rate is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

AD duties.11 We intend to instruct CBP 

to take into account the ‘‘provisional 

measures deposit cap,’’ in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212(d). 

Pursuant to Commerce’s practice, for 

entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales data submitted by Chengen 

during this review, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the rate for the China-wide entity.12

For the respondents that were not 

selected for individual examination in 

this administrative review and that 

qualified for a separate rate, the 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

determined for Chengen in these final 

results of review, identified above. We 

will also instruct CBP to take into 

account the ‘‘provisional measures 

deposit cap’’ in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(d). 

For the seven exporters found not to 

qualify for separate rates that are being 

treated as part of the China-wide entity, 

we will instruct CBP to apply an ad 

valorem assessment rate of 183.36 

percent, the current rate established for 

the China-wide entity, to all entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

which were exported by those 

companies. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review in the Federal 

Register. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for Chengen and 

other exporters that have been found 

eligible for a separate rate in this review 

will be equal to the dumping margin 

established for Chengen in these final 

results of review; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters not listed above 

that have received a separate rate in a 

prior segment of this proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific cash deposit 

rate published for the completed 

segment of the most recent period; (3) 

for all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be 183.36 

percent, the China-wide rate determined 

in the less-than-fair-value investigation; 

(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not 

received their own separate rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the term of an APO is 

a violation subject sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 23, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Postpone the Final Results Until It Is 

Able To Conduct Verification 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply the Intermediate Input 

Methodology 

Comment 3: Surrogate Financial Ratios 

Comment 4: Separate Rate 

Comment 5: Surrogate Values (SVs) 

A. SV for Logs 

B. SV for Formaldehyde 

C. SV for Labor 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Not 

Receiving Separate Rate Status 

1. Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

2. Linyi Bomei Furniture Co., Ltd. 

3. Linyi Dahua Wood Co., Ltd. 

4. Pingyi Jinniu Wood Co., Ltd. 

5. SAICG International Trading Co., Ltd. 

6. Shandong Jinhua International Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Xuzhou Amish Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26495 Filed 11–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–807] 

Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 

Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2017–2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than fair 

value (LTFV) during the period of 

review (POR), December 1, 2017 

through November 30, 2018. 

DATES: Applicable December 1, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6274. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES4
77160 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 1, 2020 / Notices 

1See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 

from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 

2018, 85 FR 7279 (February 7, 2020) (Preliminary 

Results). 2The petitioners are Bull Moose Tube Company 

and Wheatland Tube Company. 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: 

2017–2018 Administrative Review: Extension of 

Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 23, 2020. 4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 6For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for the Final Results of the 2017–2018 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 

Pipe from the United Arab Emirates,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

7See accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

8This rate is based on the simple average of the 

margins calculated for those companies selected for 

individual review. Because we cannot apply our 

normal methodology of calculating a weightedaverage margin due to requests to protect business 

proprietary information, we find this rate to be the 

best proxy of the actual weighted-average margin 

determined for the mandatory respondents. See Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, et al.: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 

Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 

53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 

Background 

This review covers 20 producers and 

exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two mandatory 

respondents for individual examination: 

Conares Metal Supply Ltd. (Conares) 

and Universal Tube and Plastic 

Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe 

Industries LLC/KHK Scaffolding and 

Framework LLC (collectively, 

Universal). The producers and or 

exporters not selected for individual 

examination are listed in the ‘‘Final 

Results of the Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

On February 7, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 In 

April and June 2020, the petitioners,2

Nucor Tubular Products Inc., Conares, 

and Universal, submitted case and 

rebuttal briefs. On April 23, 2020, we 

postponed the final results until June 8, 

2020.3 On April 24, 2020, Commerce 

tolled all deadlines in administrative 

reviews by 50 days.4 On July 21, 2020, 

Commerce tolled all preliminary and 

final deadlines in administrative 

reviews by an additional 60 days, 

thereby extending the deadline for these 

results until November 23, 2020.5

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is welded carbon-quality steel pipes and 

tube, of circular cross-section, with an 

outside diameter not more than nominal 

16 inches (406.4 mm), regardless of wall 

thickness, surface finish, end finish, or 

industry specification, and generally 

known as standard pipe, fence pipe and 

tube, sprinkler pipe, or structural pipe 

(although subject product may also be 

referred to as mechanical tubing). The 

products subject to this order are 

currently classifiable in Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) statistical reporting numbers 

7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 

7306.19.5110, 7306.19.5150, 

7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5015, 

7306.30.5020, 7306.30.5025, 

7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 

7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, 

7306.30.5090, 7306.50.1000, 

7306.50.5030, 7306.50.5050, and 

7306.50.5070. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and for customs purposes, the written 

product description remains 

dispositive.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in the 

Appendix to this notice and addressed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. Interested parties can 

find a complete discussion of these 

issues and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum, which is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. The signed and 

electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average margin 

calculations for Universal and for those 

companies not selected for individual 

review.7

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

December 1, 2017 through November 

30, 2018: 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Conares Metal Supply Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................. 2.49 

Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/KHK Scaffolding and Framework LLC ............ 3.79 

Review-Specific Average Rate 

Applicable to the Following 

Companies: 8

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Abu Dhabi Metal Pipes and Profiles Industries Complex ............................................................................................................. 3.14 

Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./Noble Steel Industries L.L.C 9 ......................................................................................... 3.14 

Al Mansoori Industrial Supply ........................................................................................................................................................ 3.14 

Baker Hughes EHO Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES4
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 1, 2020 / Notices 77161 

9We collapsed Ajmal Steel Tubes and Pipes Ind. 

L.L.C. and Noble Steel Industries L.L.C. together in 

the final results of the 2016–2017 administrative 

review. See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 

Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016– 

2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019). 

10This rate was calculated as discussed in 

footnote 8. 11See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

12See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 

From the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the 

United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906, 91908 

(December 19, 2016). 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

BioAir Solutions LLC ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3.14 

Bridgeway Shipping & Clearing Services, LLC ............................................................................................................................. 3.14 

Ferrofab FTZ .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 

Ferrolab LLC .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 

Global Steel Industries .................................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 

Halima Pipe Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3.14 

K.D. Industries Inc ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3.14 

Lamprell ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3.14 

Link Middle East Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3.14 

Noble Marine Metals Co., W.L.L ................................................................................................................................................... 3.14 

PSL FZE ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3.14 

Reyah Metal Trading FZE ............................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 

Three Star Metal Ind LLC .............................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 

Tiger Steel Industries LLC ............................................................................................................................................................. 3.14 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where Conares and Universal reported 

the entered value of their U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. Where 

either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

average 10 of the cash deposit rates 

calculated for Conares and Universal. 

The final results of this review shall be 

the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of this review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.11

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

subject to this review, the cash deposit 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

segment for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 3.14 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.12 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Secretary’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES4
77162 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 1, 2020 / Notices 

1See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 22126 

(April 21, 2020) (Order). 

2See Hualing’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Initiation of 

a New Shipper Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China (A–570–106),’’ dated October 30, 2020 (NSR 

Request). 

3 Id. at Exhibit 1. 

4 Id. 

5 Id. 

6 Id. 

7 Id. 

8 Id. at Exhibit 2. 

9 Id.; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Wooden Cabinets 

and Vanities and Components Thereof from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation Checklist for 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Dalian 

Hualing Wood Co., Ltd.,

’’ dated concurrently with 

this notice. 

10See generally NSR Request. 

11See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act. 

12See Policy Bulletin 05.1, ‘‘Separate-Rates 

Practice and Application of Combination Rates in 

Antidumping Investigations Involving Non-Market 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: November 23, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Margin Calculations 

IV. Discussion of Issues 

Conares-Specific Issues 

Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts 

Available (AFA) Based on Alleged Duty 

Avoidance Scheme 

Comment 2: Failure to Cooperate 

Universal-Specific Issues 

Comment 3: Universal Level of Trade 

(LOT) Adjustment 

Comment 4: Section 232 Duties 

Comment 5: Convert Currency for 

Universal Sales 

Comment 6: Adjust Universal Surrogate 

Production Cost 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2020–26489 Filed 11–30–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–106] 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) has determined that a 

request for a new shipper review (NSR) 

of the antidumping duty order on 

wooden cabinets and vanities and 

components thereof (wooden cabinets 

and vanities) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) meets the statutory and 

regulatory requirements for initiation. 

The period of review (POR) for the NSR 

is April 1, 2020 through September 30, 

2020. 

DATES: Effective December 1, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacob Keller, AD/CVD Operations Office 

I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; Telephone: (202) 482–4849. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Order on 

wooden cabinets and vanities on April 

21, 2020.1 On October 30, 2020, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.214(c), Commerce 

received a timely NSR request from 

Dalin Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. 

(Hualing).2

In its submission, Hualing certified 

that it is the exporter of the subject 

merchandise subject to this NSR 

request.3 Pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(ii)(A), Hualing certified 

that it did not export wooden cabinets 

and vanities to the United States during 

the period of investigation (POI).4

Additionally, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Hualing certified 

that, since the initiation of the 

investigation, it has not been affiliated 

with any producer or exporter that 

exported wooden cabinets and vanities 

to the United States during the POI, 

including those not individually 

examined during the investigation.5 As 

required by 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B), 

Hualing also certified that its export 

activities are not controlled by the 

central government of China.6 Further, 

Hualing stated that it has not made 

subsequent shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.7

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), Hualing submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) The date on which it first 

shipped subject merchandise for export 

to the United States; (2) the volume of 

its first shipment; and (3) the date of its 

first sale to an unaffiliated customer in 

the United States.8

Commerce conducted a query of U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

data and confirmed that Hualing’s 

subject merchandise entered the United 

States for consumption and that 

liquidation of such entries had been 

properly suspended for antidumping 

duties. The CBP data that Commerce 

examined are consistent with 

information provided by Hualing in its 

NSR request. In particular, the CBP data 

confirm the price and quantity reported 

by Hualing for the sale that forms the 

basis of its NSR request. 9

Period of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.214(g)(1)(i)(B), the POR for an NSR 

initiated in the month immediately 

following the semiannual anniversary 

month will be the six-month period 

immediately preceding the semiannual 

anniversary month. Therefore, the POR 

for this NSR is April 1, 2020, through 

September 30, 2020. 

Initiation of NSR 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b), and based 

on the information on the record, we 

find that Hualing’s NSR request meets 

the threshold requirements for initiation 

of an NSR of its shipment(s) of wooden 

cabinets and vanities to the United 

States.10 However, if the information 

supplied by Hualing is later found to be 

incorrect or insufficient during the 

course of this NSR, Commerce may 

rescind the review or apply adverse 

facts available, pursuant to section 776 

of the Act, as appropriate. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce will 

publish the notice of initiation of an 

NSR no later than the last day of the 

month following the anniversary or 

semiannual anniversary month of the 

order. Commerce intends to issue the 

preliminary results of this review no 

later than 180 days from the date of 

initiation, and the final results of this 

review no later than 90 days after the 

date the preliminary results are 

issued.11

It is Commerce’s practice in cases 

involving non-market economies to 

require that a company seeking to 

establish eligibility for an antidumping 

duty rate separate from the countrywide rate (i.e., separate rate) provide 

evidence of de jure and de facto absence 

of government control over the 

company’s export activities.12


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES4