alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3240 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3240

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methoxyfenozide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methoxyfenozide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHOXYFENOZIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.93 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to methoxyfenozide) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Free'' and inserting ``1.0%''; and
            (2) striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §231v. Computation and certification of account benefit ratios

#### (a) Initial computation and certification

On or before November 1, 2003, the Railroad Retirement Board shall—

(1) compute the account benefits ratios for each of the most recent 10 preceding fiscal years, and

(2) certify the account benefits ratios for each such fiscal year to the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (b) Computations and certifications after 2003

On or before November 1 of each year after 2003, the Railroad Retirement Board shall—

(1) compute the account benefits ratio for the fiscal year ending in such year, and

(2) certify the account benefits ratio for such fiscal year to the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (c) Definition

As used in this section, the term "account benefits ratio" has the meaning given that term in section 3241(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 3241(c)].

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, §23, as added Pub. L. 107–90, title I, §108(b), Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 890.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 231v, act Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, §23, as added Aug. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 98–76, title IV, §418, 97 Stat. 438, provided that for purposes of Inspector General Act of 1978, the Railroad Retirement Board is an "establishment" and the Chairman of such Board the "head of the establishment", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–504, title I, §§102(e)(3), 113, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2517, 2530, effective 180 days after Oct. 18, 1988.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123200) pertaining to theInternational Securities Exchange, Inc. Stock Option Plan; International Securities Exchange, Inc. Stock Purchase Plan; and International Securities Exchange, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan of the International Securities Exchange, Inc. of our report datedMarch 2, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of International Securities Exchange, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

New York, NY 

March 20, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### § 5.858 What authority do I have to evict drug criminals?

The lease must provide that drug-related criminal activity engaged in on or near the premises by any tenant, household member, or guest, and any such activity engaged in on the premises by any other person under the tenant's control, is grounds for you to terminate tenancy. In addition, the lease must allow you to evict a family when you determine that a household member is illegally using a drug or when you determine that a pattern of illegal use of a drug interferes with the health, safety, or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3064 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3064

  To prohibit the use of funds to implement certain regulations that 
          restrict travel to Cuba for educational activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2005

  Ms. Lee (for herself, Mr. Rangel, and Mr. McDermott) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of funds to implement certain regulations that 
          restrict travel to Cuba for educational activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pursuit of International Education 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN REGULATIONS 
              THAT RESTRICT TRAVEL TO CUBA FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES.

     No funds available to the Department of the Treasury may be used 
to implement, administer, or enforce the amendments made to paragraphs 
(a) and (b) of section 515.565 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations 
(relating to specific licenses for United States academic institutions 
and other specific licenses), as published in the Federal Register on 
June 16, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 33772). The limitation in the preceding 
sentence shall not apply to the implementation, administration, or 
enforcement of section 515.560(c)(3) of title 31, Code of Federal 
Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
UTILITY 

AERIAL 

SERVICES 

23000 Sussex Hwy. #226 Seaford, DE 19973 855-973-6476 

September 1, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Exemption No. 11237 (FAA-2014-0591) Utility Aerial Services, Inc. 

This letter is a request for amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 11237 to 

add additional aircraft to the exemption holders authorized commercial operations. On 

March 26, 2014, the FAA granted this Petition for Exemption to conduct commercial 

operations using small unmanned aircraft systems. 

Utility Aerial Services, Inc. now seeks an amendment to its exemption authorizing the 

operation of the Inspec Tools X-8. The FAA has previously granted operations of the Inspec 

Tools X-8 (exemption 12588). 

The addition of these aircraft will enhance Utility Aerial Services operational capabilities 

without any change to the safe conduct of operations. 

Thank you for your prompt attention to this request for amendment. Please do not hesitate 

to contact me if you should have any questions. 

Regard 

William R. Alex 

President/CEO 

Utility Aerial Services, Inc.
### §945. Reservation in patents of right of way for ditches or canals

In all patents for lands taken up after August 30, 1890, under any of the land laws of the United States or on entries or claims validated by this Act, west of the one hundredth meridian, it shall be expressed that there is reserved from the lands in said patent described a right of way thereon for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States.

(Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 837, §1, 26 Stat. 391.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The land laws of the United States, referred to in text, are classified generally to this title.

This Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 30, 1890, ch. 837, 26 Stat. 371, which enacted sections 212 and 945 of this title, section 861a of former Title 10, The Army, section 446 of Title 16, Conservation, sections 497, 601, and 651 of former Title 31, Money and Finance, section 887 of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters, section 120 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, and amended sections 321 and 662 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
# CITY OF BILLING S AVIATION AND TRANS I T DEPA RTME NT

1 90 1 1 T ermin al Circ l e , Ro om 21 6 Bi llin g s Lo g an International Airport Bi llin gs, Mo ntana 5 9 10 5
- 1 99 6 ( 406) 657 - 84 9 5 ( 4 0 6) 6 5 7 - 8 4 3 8 FAX w ww .flyb i llin g s . c o m Tho ma s H . Binford , A .A.E . Direc to r of Auiation and Tran sit Ke v in Plo ehn A ss is t ant Direc to r of A v ia ti o n and Tr an s it August 2, 2013

_ Mr. Dennis De...\l any

__ . __ Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office of Aviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 

# ~ - -

. . . 

## - - -- -

. ' - . . .. . .•. • . .. 

### J> Dear Mr. DeVany: . ; . : :~ __ ~ ';. rr


### - . ' . ; ' ~
" " '~ I RE: Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 Please accept this letter of support from the Billings Logan International Airport endorsing Cape Air as the next Essential Air Service provider for the eastern Montana cities of Havre , Glasgow , Glendive, Sidney , and Wolf Point. On July 25, 2013 , the Montana Essential Air Service Task Force met at the Billings Airport Terminal to discuss three proposals received for the next Essential Air Service contract for Montana . Cape Air was the only proposer to offer all of the communities the type of service those communities desired. Specifically , flights to and from the Billings Airport , secured flights from the originating airport into Billings so that passengers that are connecting onto another flight do not have to go through screening in Billings, and an actual presence at the Billings Airport and in each community. The communities were unanimous in their selection of Cape Air (Option A) , and the Billings Logan International Airport wholeheartedly supports that decision. Sincerely ,

~ Kevin Ploehn A s sistant Director of Aviation and Transit KP : mdb cc: EAS File Chrono T. Binford Debbie Alke, MT Aeronautics



# "Expect Excellence"
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arturo Pace, Also Known as Arthur Pace, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered October 15, 1976, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.
(No. 91-CC-3926

#### Midwest Construction Co., Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Agreed Order filed December 14, 1992.*

Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., for Claimant.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (Paul G. Arvites, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

AGREED ORDER

Montana, C.J.

This cause coming on to be heard pursuant to the agreed motion for the entry of judgment of the parties for the entry of a consent judgment and the Court having been apprised of the parties’ liquidating agreement dated September 25,1992, filed herein with the agreed motion, the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, and the Court not being obligated to recognize the agree*355ment of the parties but finding their agreement to be appropriate and based upon Respondent’s representation that such agreement is fair and reasonable and is in the best interest of the State of Illinois and based upon Claimants representation that it understands it is the intention of the parties to the agreement that in the event of the dismissal of the A/E action, as defined in the agreement, based upon a determination and adjudication on the merits of the State’s and Epstein Civil Engineering, Inc.’s, respective rights and obligations under the A/E agreement, as defined in the agreement, then Claimant may not reinstate the A/E action against the State;

Now therefore, it is hereby ordered that judgment is entered against the Respondent and in favor of the Claimant in the amount of $6,002,615.13, subject to the terms and conditions of the liquidating agreement.
§ 245.435 Non-insured projects: Conversion from project-paid utilities to tenant-paid utilities or a reduction in tenant utility allowances. ( a ) In the case of a proposed conversion from project-paid utilities to tenant-paid utilities or a reduction in tenant utility allowances involving a project that is assisted under section 236 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-1) or section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 (12 U.S.C. 1701s) but that does not have a mortgage insured by HUD or held by the Secretary, the provisions of this section and of §§ 245.405 through 245.425 apply to the mortgagor (project owner), except that— ( 1 ) The notice to tenants required under § 245.410 must be modified to reflect the procedural changes made by this section;
( 2 ) The materials (including tenant comments) required to be submitted to HUD under §§ 245.415 and 245.425 must be submitted to the State or local agency administering the Section 236 assistance or rent supplement assistance contracts, rather than to HUD; and
( 3 ) The State or local agency must certify that the mortgagor has complied with the requirements of §§ 245.410, 245.415, 245.416, 245.420, and 245.425.
( b ) After the State or local agency has considered the request for approval of a conversion or reduction that meets the requirements of § 245.425, it must make a determination to approve or disapprove the conversion, or to approve, adjust upward or downward, or disapprove the reduction. If the agency determines to approve the conversion or reduction (as originally proposed or as adjusted), it must submit to the appropriate local HUD office the mortgagor's request for approval of the conversion or reduction, along with the comments of the tenants and the mortgagor's evaluation of the comments, and must certify to HUD that the mortgagor is in compliance with the requirements of this subpart. HUD must review the agency's determination and certification and notify the agency of its approval or disapproval of the proposed conversion or of its approval, adjustment upward or downward, or disapproval of the proposed reduction. HUD will not unreasonably withhold approval of a conversion or reduction approved by the State or local agency.
( c ) If the agency determines to disapprove the conversion or reduction, there is no HUD review of the agency's determination.
( d ) The agency must notify the mortgagor of the final disposition of the request, and it must furnish the mortgagor with a written statement of the reasons for its approval or disapproval. The mortgagor must make the reasons for approval or disapproval known to the tenants, by service of notice on them as provided in § 245.15. If the agency has approved the proposed conversion or a reduction, the notice must set forth the information prescribed in § 245.430(b) (1) and (2).
§ 599.5 Data used for eligibility determinations. ( a ) *Source of data.* The data to be used in determining the population, poverty rate, unemployment rate and household income distribution information of an area is from the 1990 Decennial Census.
( b ) *Geographic boundaries.* The boundary of an area that is nominated for designation as an Renewal Community must coincide with the boundaries of census tracts, as defined in § 599.3 except in the case of Indian reservation areas where the use of census tracts would tend to include areas outside the jurisdiction of the reservation governing body and such body is not making the nomination in concert with another jurisdiction.
### §422a. Declaration of purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to encourage State and local participation in the development of projects under the Federal reclamation laws, with emphasis on rehabilitation and betterment of existing projects for purposes of significant conservation of water, energy and the environment and for purpose of water quality control, and to provide for Federal assistance in the development of similar projects in the seventeen western reclamation States by non-Federal organizations.

(Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, §1, 70 Stat. 1044; Pub. L. 99–546, title III, §302, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3053.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 422b of this title.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–546 inserted ", with emphasis on rehabilitation and betterment of existing projects for purposes of significant conservation of water, energy and the environment and for purpose of water quality control," after "laws".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–546, title III, §310, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3055, provided that: "The provisions of Sections 303 and 308 of this title [amending sections 422c and 422h of this title] shall take effect upon enactment of this title [Oct. 27, 1986]. The provisions of sections 304(a) and 305 of this title [amending section 422d of this title] shall be applicable to all proposals for which final applications are received by the Secretary after January 1, 1986. The provisions of Sections 302, 304(b), 306, and 307 [amending this section and sections 422d and 422e of this title] shall be applicable to all proposals for which draft applications are received by the Secretary after Auguest [sic] 15, 1986."

#### Separability

Act Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, §12, 70 Stat. 1047, provided that: "If any provisions of this Act [enacting this subchapter] or the application of such provision to any person, organization, or circumstance shall be held invalid, the remainder of the Act and the application of such provision to persons, organizations, or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid shall not be affected thereby."
### §853. Selections in Utah to supply deficiencies of school lands

All the provisions of sections 851 and 852 of this title, which provide for the selection of lands for educational purposes in lieu of those appropriated for other purposes, are made applicable to the State of Utah, and the grant of school lands to said State, including sections 2 and 32 in each township, and indemnity therefor, shall be administered and adjusted in accordance with the provisions of said sections, anything in the Act approved July 16, 1894, providing for the admission of said State into the Union, to the contrary notwithstanding.

Wherever the words "sections 16 and 36" occur in said sections, the same as applicable to the State of Utah shall read: "sections 2, 16, 32, and 36", and wherever the words "sixteenth and thirty-sixth sections" occur the same shall read: "second, sixteenth, thirty-second, and thirty-sixth sections", and wherever the words "sections 16 or 36" occur the same shall read: "sections 2, 16, 32, or 36", and wherever the words "two sections" occur the same shall read "four sections."

(May 3, 1902, ch. 683, §§1, 2, 32 Stat. 188, 189.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act approved July 16, 1894, referred to in text, is act July 16, 1894, ch. 138, 28 Stat. 107. Provisions of such act relating to admission of Utah into the Union are not classified to the Code.
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Dave Brown [DBrown@spi-ind.com]

Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 9:52 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: contact info

David C. Brown, PE

Environmental Affairs & Compliance Manager

Sierra Pacific Industries

19794 Riverside Avenue

Redding, CA 96049-6028

(530) 378-8179

(530) 378-8139 fax

(530) 391-7650 cell

 

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This communication and any accompanying or attached document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the 

sole use of the addressee(s). If you receive this communication in error, you are advised that any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in 

reliance upon this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately telephone Sierra Pacific Industries at (530) 378-

8179, and delete this message without copying it. Thank you.
Editorial Note on Part 761
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 761 appear at 64 FR 49917, Sept. 14, 1999.

§ 761.1 Purpose and scope. This part 761 contains the regulatory requirements for the Assisted Housing Drug Elimination Program (AHDEP) and the Public Housing Drug Elimination Program (PHDEP). The purposes of these programs are to: ( a ) Eliminate drug-related and violent crime and problems associated with it in and around the premises of Federally assisted low-income housing, and public and Indian housing developments;
( b ) Encourage owners of Federally assisted low-income housing, public housing agencies and Indian housing authorities (collectively referred to as HAs), and resident management corporations to develop a plan that includes initiatives that can be sustained over a period of several years for addressing drug-related and violent crime and problems associated with it in and around the premises of housing proposed for funding under this part; and
( c ) Make available Federal grants to help owners of Federally assisted low-income housing, HAs, and RMCs carry out their plans.
[61 FR 13987, Mar. 28, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 49917, Sept. 14, 1999]
Opinion filed June 6, 2024

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________

No. 11-24-00150-CR

___________

IN RE RANDALL LEE NIX 

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Randall Lee Nix, has filed in this court a motion to dismiss his 

petition for writ of mandamus. In the motion, Relator states that he “moves this 

Court to withdraw” the petition. The motion is signed by both Relator and his 

counsel. 

We grant Relator’s motion and dismiss this proceeding. In doing so, we also 

withdraw our order dated May 30, 2024, staying the proceedings in the trial court. 

W. STACY TROTTER

JUSTICE

June 6, 2024

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
#### § 300.15 Exceptions.

In the conduct of its affairs, in individual cases or classes of cases, the Association reserves the right, consistent with law, without prior notice and at any time, to alter or waive any of the requirements contained in this chapter or elsewhere or to impose other and additional requirements; it further reserves the right, without prior notice and at any time, to amend or rescind any or all of the material set forth herein.
### §705. Duplicate orders to print

The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall examine the orders of the Senate and House of Representatives for printing, and in case of duplication shall print under the first order received.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1248; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §135 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §53, 28 Stat. 608).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".