alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3 Certificate:

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL REPORT

OF GRAY PEAKS, INC.

I, the undersigned, being the President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, of Gray Peaks, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company),
does hereby certify, to the best of his information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 3, 2007



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bernard Asher                                      
|Title: President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 3280.810 Electrical testing. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75757 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) *Dielectric strength test.* The wiring of each manufactured home shall be subjected to a 1-minute, 900 to 1079 volt dielectric strength test (with all switches closed) between live parts and the manufactured home ground, and neutral and the manufactured home ground. Alternatively, the test may be performed at 1080 to 1250 volts for 1 second. This test shall be performed after branch circuits are complete and after fixtures or appliances are installed. Fixtures or appliances which are listed shall not be required to withstand the dielectric strength test.
( b ) *Additional testing.* Each manufactured home must be subjected to the following tests: ( 1 ) An electrical continuity test to assure that metallic parts are effectively bonded;
( 2 ) An operational test of all devices and utilization equipment, except water heaters, electric ranges, electric furnaces, dishwashers, clothes washers/dryers, and portable appliances, to demonstrate they are connected and in working order; and
( 3 ) Electrical polarity checks to determine that connections have been made in accordance with applicable provisions of these standards and Article 550.17 of NFPA 70-2005 (incorporated by reference, see § 3280.4). Visual verification is an acceptable electrical polarity check.
[58 FR 55020, Oct. 25, 1993, as amended at 86 FR 2523, Jan. 12, 2021]
§ 8.6 Communications. ( a ) The recipient shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, beneficiaries, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The recipient shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. ( i ) In determining what auxiliary aids are necessary, the recipient shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The recipient is not required to provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where a recipient communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective communication systems shall be used.
( b ) The recipient shall adopt and implement procedures to ensure that interested persons (including persons with impaired vision or hearing) can obtain information concerning the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) This section does not require a recipient to take any action that the recipient can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. If an action would result in such an alteration or burdens, the recipient shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity receiving HUD assistance.
Case 3:09-cv-02880-BZ Document 53 Filed 06/07/10 Page 1 of 2
June 7, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02880-BZ Document 53 Filed 06/07/10 Page 2 of 2
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-2539

_____________________________

THOMAS A. SOSNOWSKI,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

September 30, 2020

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Thomas A. Sosnowski, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
### §231f–1. Annual actuarial report

As part of the annual report required under section 231u(a) of this title, the Railroad Retirement Board shall submit to the Congress a report on the actuarial status of the railroad retirement system under various economic and employment assumptions. Such report shall include any recommendation for financing changes which might be advisable, including—

(1) any adjustment the Railroad Retirement Board recommends regarding the rates of taxes imposed by sections 3201(b), 3211(a)(2), and 3221(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 3201(b), 3211(a)(2), 3221(b)], and

(2) if there are sufficient reserves in the Railroad Retirement Account, whether—

(A) the rates of such taxes should be reduced, or

(B) any part of the tax imposed by section 3221(b) of such Code should be diverted to the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Account to aid in the repayment of its debt to the Railroad Retirement Account.

(Pub. L. 98–76, title V, §502, Aug. 12, 1983, 97 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 104–66, title II, §2221(a), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 733.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Railroad Retirement Solvency Act of 1983, and not as part of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1995—Pub. L. 104–66 which directed the amendment of this section by substituting "As part of the annual report required under section 231u(a) of this title" for "On or before July 1, 1985, and each calendar year thereafter", was executed by making the substitution for "On or before July 1 of 1985, and of each calendar year thereafter", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1986—Par. (1). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954".
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reginald Thompson, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 720]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed June 5, 2002, upon his conviction of burglary in the first degree, after his plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention on appeal that his sentence was illegal because he was erroneously sentenced as a predicate felon, the record conclusively demonstrates that he was not sentenced as a predicate felon.

*573The defendant, by waiving his right to appeal, waived any right to challenge the excessiveness of his sentence *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733 [1998]; *People v Ackridge,*31 AD3d 654 [2006], *lv denied*8 NY3d 843 [2007]).

The Supreme Court sentenced the defendant to a determinate prison term of 12 years. Neither the sentencing minutes nor the court’s order of commitment mentioned the imposition of any period of post-release supervision. Therefore, the sentence appealed from does not include any period of post-release supervision *(see Hill v United States ex rel. Wampler,*298 US 460 [1936]; *Earley v Murray,*451 F3d 71 [2006], *reh denied*462 F3d 147 [2006]; *People v Smith,*37 AD3d 499 [2007]; *but see People v Sparber,*34 AD3d 265 [2006]). Crane, J.P., Ritter, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
### §6975. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of any provision of this chapter to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, and the remainder of this chapter, shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §7005, as added Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2827.)
## M R 1 0 2o n

TMWgf

. DEPA^N TO F TRANSPORTATIO N „ •nf/p T^iP^D'^Tl;'•''^iO OFFIC E O F HEARING S



## ...,. , fTOPER,J,.,v , WASHINGTON , D.C

. <EARlN G DOCKE T ! l HA R l b A1:0 1

*************************************************** * I n th e Matte rof : CONTINENTA LAIRLINE S INC , **************************************************** * FA ADocke t Nos
. CP10SW001 1 Z«>( 0 CP10SW001 2 CP10SW001 3 CP10SW001 4 CP10SW001 5 CP10SW001 6 FA ACas e No s 2009SW27003 7

2009SW27005 8 2009SW27012 6 2009SW27019 3 2009SW27020 2 2009SW27006 0 Judg e Richard C

. Goodwi n WITHDRAWA L O F COMPLAIN T Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , i n accordanc e wit h Sectio n 13.21 5 ofth e Rule s o fPractic e i n FA

ACivi l PenaltyActions , hereb ywithdraw s it s complaint s i n th e abov e style d actions
. Thes e complaint s are withdraw n becaus e th e partie s hav e reache d a settlemen t o fth e case s an d a hearin g i s n o longe rrequired
. Date d thi s 4t h Da yo fMarc h 2011
. Respectfull ysubmitted , DAVI D L
. DONNELL , ACTIN G REGIONA LCOUNSE L SOUTHWES TREGIO N By : ^ Ti m Duf f AgencyAttorne y P : 817-222-509 9 F : 817-222-509 2CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb ycertif ytha t o n thi s 3r d da yo fMarch , 2011 , th e origina l an d on e copy , respectively , o fth e foregoin g documen t wer e sen t b yfirs t class an d certifie d retur n receip t requeste d to : Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W

. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AG C -43 0 Wilbu rWright Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0
Thoma s Newto n Boilin g Managin g Attorney , RegulatoryAffair s Continenta l Airlines , Inc
. 160 0 Smit h Street , 15'^ Floo rHQSL G Houston , TX7700 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar d C

. Goodwin , Administrativ e LawJudg e U.S

. Departmen t o fTransportatio n Offic e o fHearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E

. Eas t Building , Groun d Floor , Roo m 312-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0

j n C

. ^ala , Progra m Analys t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Southwes t Regio n P : 817-222-508 7 F : 817-222-509 2 Dated: Marc h 4 , 201 1
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 16, 2004



<PAGE>


(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ William Swain
                                       ------------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 16, 2004
### §10708. Sale of property

A district court of the United States may direct the sale of any part of the property of a deceased seaman. Proceeds of the sale shall be held as wages of the seaman are held.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 574.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10708 | 46:628 |

Section 10708 permits a district court to sell a deceased seaman's property and treat the proceeds as wages.
(No. 87-CC-0220

#### William Woodward, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Order filed April 20, 1987.*

Richard J. Habiger, for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (Suzanne Schmitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

*203Raucci, J.

This matter came to be heard on Claimant’s verified petition, Respondent’s answer, and Claimant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

The Court having read the pleadings and Respondent’s admissions, and being fully advised in the premises, finds the following facts:

1. Claimant, William Woodward, is an employee of the U.S. Forestry Service and is the victim of a crime that occurred more than two years ago.

2. Three twenty ($20.00) dollar bills *[i.e.,*$60.00] were stolen from Mr. Woodward by Richard Carter, a prisoner at the Southern Illinois Community Correctional Center, more commonly called the “House of Glass,” a correctional facility operated by the Respondent.

3. Law enforcement authorities, the sheriff of Jackson County and local correctional officials, immediately investigated and found the money stolen from Mr. Woodward in the possession of Mr. Carter.

*4.*Thereafter, no criminal prosecution was initiated for the theft of Mr. Woodward’s money, but Mr. Carter was returned to maximum security at Menard Correction Center for violation of the disciplinary rules of the Department of Corrections.

*2045. The three $20.00 bills *[i.e.,*$60.00] stolen from Mr. Woodward and found in the possession of Mr. Carter were confiscated by correctional officials and deposited in a “locally held fund” in the possession and control of local correctional officials at the “House of Glass.” [The fund is commonly referred to as a “resident benefit fund.”]

6. Thereafter, Mr. Woodward persistently endeavored to have his money returned to him but all efforts were rebuffed by departmental officials.

7. Upon written and telephonic inquiry by his counsel, Claimant was informed that the department would not return his $60.00 to him without an adjudication by the Court.

The answer filed on behalf of the Respondent, the Department of Corrections, admits Respondent’s liability to Claimant in the amount of $60.00, as prayed for by Claimant.

Based on the facts found and Respondent’s admission of liability, the Court concludes that no genuine issue of material fact exists which would require an evidentiary hearing and that judgment in the amount of $60.00 should be entered as a matter of law in favor of Claimant.

It is therefore ordered that Claimant, William Woodward, be and hereby is awarded the sum of sixty ($60.00) dollars.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VITECH
AMERICA, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                     9,594,084
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             42,446,445
<ALLOWANCES>                               3,540,699
<INVENTORY>                               31,961,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          89,840,637
<PP&E>                                    23,225,654
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,364,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           143,666,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     50,294,206
<BONDS>                                   52,181,919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                  65,346,448
<OTHER-SE>                               (24,156,008)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             143,666,565
<SALES>                                   69,135,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          69,135,990
<CGS>                                     40,658,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             58,667,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        14,072,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (21,706,255)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (21,706,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                             (21,706,255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.48)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3053 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3053

 To remediate groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates in the 
                   city of Santa Clarita, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2005

  Mr. McKeon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To remediate groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates in the 
                   city of Santa Clarita, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Eastern Santa Clara River Basin 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. EASTERN SANTA CLARA RIVER BASIN GROUNDWATER RESTORATION.

    (a) Eastern Santa Clara River Basin.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Army, in cooperation 
        with Federal, State, and local government agencies, shall 
        participate in studies and other investigative activities and 
        in the construction, planning, and design of projects 
        determined by the Secretary to offer a long-term solution to 
        the problem of groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates 
        in the Eastern Santa Clara River Basin, in the city of Santa 
        Clarita, California.
            (2) Sources of perchlorate.--The investigative activities 
        and projects described in paragraph (1) shall include sites 
        that are--
                    (A) sources of perchlorate; and
                    (B) located in the city of Santa Clarita, 
                California.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 3. GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION WITHIN THE SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOR 
              PERCHLORATE CONTAMINATION.

    Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 3835; 113 Stat. 335) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(75) Santa clarita, california.--$25,000,00 to remediate 
        groundwater contamination in the Eastern Santa Clara River 
        Basin, Santa Clarita, California. The Secretary shall allow 
        credit for in-kind services provided by the non-Federal sponsor 
        before the initiation of the project, not to exceed the non-
        Federal cost of the project. If the in-kind services provided 
        by the non-Federal sponsor before the initiation of the project 
        exceed the non-Federal cost of the project, the Secretary shall 
        reimburse the non-Federal sponsor for such services.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The unaudited financial statements of the company as of and for the three months
ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         762,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,144,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,500
<INVENTORY>                                  1,704,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,659,460
<PP&E>                                          90,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,747,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          432,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,328,406
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,013,023)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,747,680
<SALES>                                      1,283,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,283,527
<CGS>                                        1,029,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,029,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               385,755
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             551,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (689,792)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (689,792)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>