alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of CommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  March 28, 2005 |  | By: /s/ C. Allan Ducker, III
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                      |  | C. Allan Ducker, III        
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer     

|Date:  March 28, 2005 |  | By: /s/ John W. Hobbs  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | John W. Hobbs          
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 41.1 Applicability. This part sets forth policies and procedures for the enforcement of standards and requirements for accessibility by the physically handicapped imposed: ( a ) For nonresidential buildings or facilities by regulations issued by the General Services Administration at subchapter D of the Federal Property Management Regulations, subpart 101-19.6—Accommodations for the Physically Handicapped, or
( b ) By regulation or contract under any other program of the Department, except a program subject only to standards or requirements at 24 CFR part 8 imposed pursuant to section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
The policies and procedures of this part shall apply after the effective date of these regulations to all complaints received, and/or findings of noncompliance made, regarding buildings or facilities subject to such regulatory or contractural requirements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3021 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3021

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
 To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
       program through September 30, 2005, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TANF Extension Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES BLOCK 
              GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2005.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 of such 
Act, shall continue through September 30, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2004, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) 
of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 
not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made 
pursuant to this authority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 
2005 at the level provided for such activities through the fourth 
quarter of fiscal year 2004.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ``June 
30'' and inserting ``September 30''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE 
              AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 
              2005.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through September 30, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2004, and out of any money in the Treasury 
of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority through the fourth 
quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level provided for such activities 
through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCEPrincipal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-20 (the Trust) I, Nancy H. Forte, a duly elected and acting officer of Citibank, N.A. (Indenture Trustee),
do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that: 1. I have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the application of
trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section
6.06 of the Indenture pursuant to which the Trusts notes were issued during the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2004 (the Relevant Year); and 2. Based upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance, dated March 15, 2005,
prepared by the Ernst & Young LLP substantially in accordance with Section 4.05 of the Expense and
Indemnity Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the application of trust money collected by the
Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture was
performed in accordance with the terms of the Indenture throughout the Relevant Year. CITIBANK, N.A., as Indenture TrusteeBy:
    
    /s/ Nancy H. ForteName: Nancy H. ForteTitle: Assistant Vice PresidentDate:
    
    March 29, 2005
Case 3:09-cv-00901-EMC Document 68 Filed 03/04/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:09-cv-00901-EMC Document 68 Filed 03/04/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Financial
Position and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               8
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                       1106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2327
<PP&E>                                            2104
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              870
<BONDS>                                            978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                        2463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4905
<SALES>                                            773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1133
<CGS>                                              478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    128
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 79
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        79
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
### §390h–25. Mountain View, Moffett Area reclaimed water pipeline project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the City of Palo Alto, California, and the City of Mountain View, California, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of recycled water distribution systems.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation and maintenance of the project authorized by this section.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1642, as added Pub. L. 110–229, title V, §512(a)(1), May 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 841.)
### §596. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 20, 1921, ch. 9, 42 Stat. 7, gave ex-service men, successful at drawing held March 5, 1920, but unable to make entry because of reinstatement of conflicting claims, preference for not less than thirty days before next opening of lands to other entry.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 631 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On March 22, 2010, the court ordered proponents not later

than April 12, 2010 to “make the appropriate motion or submission”

to supplement the trial record with documents obtained through

third party production. Doc #623 at 24. The Ninth Circuit stayed

the court’s order “pending appeal.” Doc #6 in 10-15649 (9th Cir

March 26, 2010). The appeal was dismissed on April 12, 2010 at 5

PM PDT. Id Doc #14.

Proponents have made no submission or motion to

supplement the trial record. Accordingly, proponents are ORDERED

to SHOW CAUSE in writing not later than April 16, 2010 at 5 PM PDT

why the evidentiary record should not now be closed. Failure to

respond to this order shall be deemed grounds to close the

evidentiary record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 631 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE

TRUST FUND,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MB FLOORING INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02241 SI

ORDER

The Court has reviewed defendant’s Notice of Bankruptcy filing (doc. # 33), indicating that it

has filed in this for bankruptcy protection."

This case clearly meets the criteria of Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures, Chapter V of

Volume XI, for statistical closing. 

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be closed.

Dated: 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02241-SI Document 34 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00703-CR

Daniel Thomas Sandoval, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3012045, HONORABLE TOM BLACKWELL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant Daniel Thomas Sandoval of burglary of a habitation. Tex.

Pen. Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2003). The district court imposed punishment at twenty years’

imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the app e al is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of A nders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. S ee also Penson v. Ohio

, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State

, 573

S.W.2d 8 0 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State

, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State

, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State

, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, who was advised of his

right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.2 We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: July 24, 2003

Do Not Publish
§ 266.115 Program monitoring and evaluation. ( a ) *HFA certifications.* HUD will rely heavily on the certifications required of an HFA under this part and such additional certifications as the Commissioner may require in administrative procedures. An HFA's continued participation in the program is predicated upon compliance with these certifications and its recommending for endorsement only those mortgages that comply with requirements of the program, including the HFA's origination, underwriting and closing procedures incorporated by reference into the Risk-Sharing Agreement.
( b ) *Monitoring and evaluation.* Monitoring and evaluation activities will focus on compliance with program requirements and performance of the HFA in meeting program objectives of providing affordable housing. They will enable HUD to evaluate the effectiveness of the program as required by section 542(d)(3) of the Act.
( c ) *Responsibility for monitoring and evaluation.* The Commissioner or designee will be responsible for overall program monitoring and evaluation.
( d ) *HFA submissions.* ( 1 ) For each loan insured under this part, basic underwriting and closing information must be submitted in a format specified by HUD and must accompany the closing docket submitted in accordance with § 266.420(b). Information relative to project management and servicing (including disposition) will be required after endorsement.
( 2 ) The HFA must submit semi-annual reports setting forth the original mortgage amounts and outstanding principal balances on mortgages the HFA has underwritten, and the status of all projects insured under this part (e.g., current, in default, acquired, under workout agreement, in bankruptcy). For projects where the mortgagor has declared bankruptcy, the HFA must submit information containing the date the bankruptcy was filed and the date the HFA requested the Court to dismiss the bankruptcy proceedings.
[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83441, Dec. 22, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,654
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,480
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             919
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               906
<LOANS>                                         41,460
<ALLOWANCE>                                        518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,687
<DEPOSITS>                                      62,377
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                397
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,960
<OTHER-SE>                                         (47)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  70,687
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,999
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  321
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,350
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 631
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 633
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              717
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       41
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (14)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    181
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         110
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       110
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                         18
<LOANS-PAST>                                         1
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   482
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        5
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  518
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               518
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER, page 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

ANITA HUNTER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITIBANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 09-2079 JW (PVT)

ORDER RE STIPULATION RE: DEPOSITION

PROTOCOL

Currently pending before the court is the parties’ proposed Stipulation re: Deposition

Protocol; and Proposed Order. The stipulation has been referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge by

virtue of the Court’s San Jose Division’s Standing Order Regarding Case Management in Civil

Cases. Based on the proposed form of stipulation and order,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than August 31, 2010, the parties shall submit briefs

setting forth there respective positions with regard to a limit of depositions (either in number of

depositions or hours of depositions). The court is not inclined to allow the parties to take an

unlimited depositions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pending entry of a final form of stipulation and order re:

deposition protocol, the form of order filed herein at docket no. 311 shall govern this action.

Dated: 8/12/10

 

PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02079-JCS Document 372 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 1
### §36. Purchase of books

The purchase of professional and scientific books and periodicals needed for statistical purposes by the scientific divisions of the United States Geological Survey is authorized to be made and paid for out of appropriations made for the said Survey.

(June 28, 1902, ch. 1301, §1, 32 Stat. 455.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
#### Joseph U. Fiore, Appellant, v. Pasquale Amoruso et al., Respondents; Frank Ferrino et al., Intervening Respondents.

Motion by appellant to extend time to perfect appeal, to abridge the record, and to settle the case on appeal as abridged. Motion denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 

and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: September 8, 2005 

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.