Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. I N TH E UN I TED STATES COU RT OF APPEA LS F O R T H E F IF T H C IR C U IT

N o. 09- 50545 Su m m ar yC al endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. HECTOR HERNANDEZ- LUNA , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 2: 08- C R

- 867- 1
B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * H e c t o rH e r n and e z - Luna p l e ad e d g ui l t y t o o ne c o unto f il l e ga lr e e nt r y. The d is t r ic tc o u r tim p o s e das e n t e n c e o f 3 7 m o n t h s , t h e h ig h e s t in H e r n a n d e z -L u n a ’s gu i d eli n es ra n ge of i m p ri son m en t. H e r n a n d e z -L u n aa r g u e s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n a b le a n dg r e a te rth a n n e c e s s a r yto m e e t 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) ’ s s e n te n c in gg o a ls b e c a u s e (1 ) h is c r im in a l h is to r y w a s ta k e n in to a c c o u n t tw ic e in d e te r m in in gh is g u id e lin e s ra n g e o f im p r is o n m e n t, (2 ) h is o ffe n s e w a s n o tv io le n t, a n d(3 ) h is United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 8, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-50545 Document: 0051999665 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2010N o. 09- 50545

2 m o t ivef

o rr e e nt r y w as t o a s s i s thi s c o m m o n l aw w i fe , w ho w as fac i ng e vi c t i o n. In revi ew i n g a sentence, w e no rm a lly“co n sid e r[] th e ‘ su b sta n tiv e re a so n a bl en ess of th e sen ten ce i m p ose d u n d er a n ab u se-of- d i scre ti on stan d a rd
. ’” Un i t ed S t ate s v. C i sneros- G u t i errez , 517 F. 3d 751, 764 ( 5t h C i r . 2008) ( quot i ng G allv. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 52 U
. S. 3 8, 5 1 ( 20 07 ) )
. H o w e ve r , H e r nand e z - Luna d i d no to bj e c ti n t he d is tr ic t c o u r t t o th e re a s o n a b le n e s s o f h is s e n te n c e , s o o u rr e v ie w is fo rp la in e r r o r . SeeUni t e d S t at e sv. A n d ers on , 5 5 9 F .3 d3 4 8 , 3 5 8 (5 th C ir .), c e r t . de ni e d, 1 2 9 S
. C t. 2 8 1 4 (20 0 9 ). A pl ai n e r r o ri s af

o r fe i t e d e r r o rt hati s c l e aro ro bv i o us a nd a f fe c t s t he d e fe n d a n t’s s u b s ta n tia l r ig h ts . Uni t e d S t at e sv. Mondrago n- Sa nt i ago , 564 F. 3d 3 5 7 , 3 6 1 (5 th C ir .), c e r t. d e n ie d, 130 S
. C t . 1 92 ( 200 9)
. W h en those el em en t s are s h o w n , th is c o u r t h a s th e d is c r e tio n to c o r r e c t th e e r r o r o n l yif it “s e r io u s ly a ff ects th e fairne ss, in teg ri ty, o r p u b l i c rep u tati on of j u d i ci a lpr oce ed i n gs . ” I d. (cita tion om itted ). The di s t r i c t c o ur t e xp l ai ne d t hat i t s e l e c t e d w hat i t de t e r m i ne d to be a suff i ci en tsentenc e a fter consi deri n g t h e adv i sory G u i del i n es and t h ei r pol i cy st atem en t s, t h e ot h er 18 U
. S
. C
. § 3553 ( a) fact ors, the al l ocuti on of t h e parti es, an d the fact u al in f

orm ati on contai n ed i n t h e presentence report . Th e di st ri ct cou rt exp l a i n edto H ern a n d ez -L u n atha t it beg a n the s ent enc i ng pr oc ee di ng w i th th e in te n t to g iv e h im a n a b o v e -g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e a fte r c o n c lu d in g th a t h is m o t iv e fo rr e e n t r yw a s d r u gd i s t r ib u t io n , b u ta ft e rh e a r in gH e r n a n d e z -L u n a ’s sentenci n g argu m en t s, t h e di st ri ctcourtconcl u dedt h at a w ith in -gu i del i n es sen ten ce w a s su ff

i ci en t. H ern a n d ez -L u n ah a s notr ebutt ed the pr es um pti on that h is w ith in -g u id e lin e s s e n te n c e w a s re a s o n a b le , see Un i t ed Stat es v. A lon zo , 435 F .3d 55 1 , 55 4 ( 5 th C i r. 20 0 6 ), n or h a s h e d em on strate dplainerro r, see Mondrago n- Sa n ti ago , 5 6 4 F .3 da t 3 6 1
. T h e ju d g m e n t o f th e d is tr ic t c o u r t is AF F I RMED. Case: 09-50545 Document: 0051999665 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2010