alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2969 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2969

 To amend title 9 of the United States Code to exclude all employment 
 contracts from the arbitration provisions of chapter 1 of such title; 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2005

    Mr. Kucinich (for himself, Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. 
   Conyers, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Markey, and Mr. Andrews) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
 the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the 
 Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 9 of the United States Code to exclude all employment 
 contracts from the arbitration provisions of chapter 1 of such title; 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preservation of Civil Rights 
Protections Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT.

    Section 1 of title 9, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``of seamen'' and all that follows through ``commerce''.

SEC. 3. UNENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN EMPLOYMENT 
              CONTRACTS.

    (a) Protection of Employee Rights.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, any clause of any agreement between an employer and 
an employee that requires arbitration of a claim arising under the 
Constitution or laws of the United States shall not be enforceable.
    (b) Exceptions.--
            (1) Waiver or consent after claim arises.--Subsection (a) 
        shall not apply with respect to any claim if, after such claim 
        arises, the parties involved voluntarily consent to submit such 
        claim to arbitration.
            (2) Collective bargaining agreements.--Subsection (a) shall 
        not preclude an employee or union from enforcing any of the 
        rights or terms of a valid collective bargaining agreement.

SEC. 4. APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    This Act and the amendment made by section 2 shall apply with 
respect to all employment contracts in force before, on, or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.2



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated November 8, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2137 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-266968) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 8, 2022
ex-1042093022mcdonaldxpa






  2188960.v1    HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION  DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN  PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT - ADDENDUM   This Participation Agreement Addendum (“Addendum”) is hereby entered into by and  between HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION (the “Company”) and Bryan McDonald  an employee of the Company (the “Participant,” and together with the Company, the  “Parties”).    RECITALS  A. The Company has adopted the Heritage Financial Corporation Deferred  Compensation Plan, effective July 1, 2012, as amended and restated  August 29, 2012 (the “Plan”);  B. The Parties entered into a Participation Agreement, dated January 1, 2015 as  amended by the Participation Agreement – Addendums dated December 19, 2016  and November 4, 2019 (the “Participation Agreement”);  C. The Committee has determined that the Participation Agreement should be  extended pursuant to this Addendum to provide additional benefits to the  Participant for the 2023, 2024 and 2025 calendar years; and  D. This Addendum is attached to and made a part of the Participation Agreement,  incorporates all defined terms therein unless otherwise defined herein, and in the  event of any conflict between the terms contained in this Addendum and the terms  contained in the Participation Agreement, the terms contained in this Addendum  shall supersede and control the obligations and liabilities of the Parties.  AGREEMENT  In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants of the parties  hereto set forth in this Addendum, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and  sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound,  hereby expressly covenant and agree as follows:  Section 1. Company Contributions.  The Company shall continue to make a  Company Contribution for Plan Years 2023, 2024, and 2025, on the same terms and conditions  set forth in the Participant Agreement, with the performance metrics and targets in connection  with such Company Contributions for such Plan Years to be established in the sole discretion of  the Committee, following consultation with the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Section 2. Entire Agreement.  This Addendum, in addition to the Participation  





 






  2188960.v1  Agreement and the Plan, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties concerning the  subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, undertakings, agreements, and   arrangements with respect thereto, whether written or oral.    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Participant have duly executed this  Addendum as of the date set forth below.       HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION   By: /S/ JEFFREY J. DEUEL           JEFFREY J. DEUEL   Its: CEO & President   Date: November 8, 2022      PARTICIPANT   /S/ BRYAN MCDONALD    BRYAN McDONALD
§ 55.14 Modified 5-step decision making process for certain categories of proposed actions. The decision making steps in § 55.20(b), (c), and (g) (Steps 2, 3, and 7) do not apply to the following categories of proposed actions: ( a ) HUD's or the recipient's actions involving the disposition of acquired multifamily housing projects or “bulk sales” of HUD-acquired (or under part 58 of recipients') one- to four-family properties in communities that are in the Regular Program of the NFIP and in good standing (*i.e.,* not suspended from program eligibility or placed on probation under 44 CFR 59.24). For programs subject to part 58, this paragraph applies only to recipients' disposition activities that are subject to review under part 58.
( b ) HUD's actions under the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*) for the purchase or refinancing of existing multifamily housing projects, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, board and care facilities, and intermediate care facilities, in communities that are in good standing under the NFIP.
( c ) HUD's or the recipient's actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weatherization, or improvement of existing multifamily housing projects, hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, board and care facilities, intermediate care facilities, and one- to four-family properties, in communities that are in the Regular Program of the NFIP and are in good standing (*i.e.,* not suspended from program eligibility or placed on probation under 44 CFR 59.24), provided that the number of units is not increased more than 20 percent, the action does not involve a conversion from nonresidential to residential land use, the action does not meet the thresholds for “substantial improvement” under § 55.2(b)(12), and the footprint of the structure and paved areas is not increased by more than 20 percent.
( d ) HUD's or the recipient's actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, modernization, weatherization, or improvement of existing nonresidential buildings and structures, in communities that are in the Regular Program of the NFIP and are in good standing (*i.e.,* not suspended from program eligibility or placed on probation under 44 CFR 59.24), provided that the action does not meet the thresholds for “substantial improvement” under § 55.2(b)(12) and the footprint of the structure and paved areas is not increased by more than 20 percent.
( e ) HUD's or the recipient's actions under any HUD program involving the repair, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing nonstructural improvements including streets, curbs, and gutters, where any increase of the total impervious surface area of the facility is de minimis. This provision does not include critical actions, levee systems, chemical storage facilities (including any tanks), wastewater facilities, or sewer lagoons.
[89 FR 30909, Apr. 23, 2024]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACY WINTERS ROGERS,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social

Security

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02573 SI

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied and defendant’s motion for summary

judgment is granted. Judgment is entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: June 22, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02573-SI Document 20 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 8.58 Hearings. ( a ) *Opportunity for hearing.* Whenever an opportunity for a hearing is required by § 8.57(c), reasonable notice shall be given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the affected applicant or recipient. This notice shall advise the applicant or recipient of the action proposed to be taken, the specific provision under which the proposed action against it is to be taken, and the matters of fact or law asserted as the basis for this action. The notice shall: ( 1 ) Fix a date not less than 20 days after the date of the notice for the applicant or recipient to request the administrative law judge to schedule a hearing, or
( 2 ) Advise the applicant or recipient that the matter has been scheduled for hearing at a stated time and place. The time and place so fixed shall be reasonable and shall be subject to change for cause. The complainant, if any, shall be advised of the time and place of the hearing. An applicant or recipient may waive a hearing and submit written information and argument for the record. The failure of an applicant or recipient to request a hearing under this paragraph or to appear at a hearing for which a date has been set is a waiver of the right to a hearing under § 8.57(c) and consent to the making of a decision on the basis of available information.
( b ) *Hearing procedures.* Hearings shall be conducted in accordance with 24 CFR part 180.
[53 FR 20233, June 2, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996]
#### § 35.805 Definitions and other general requirements.

Definitions and other general requirements that apply to this subpart are found in subpart B of this part.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 25, 2019

d0418

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2019

158115 & (12)(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158115

COA: 341484

Saginaw CC: 05-025510-FC

MARCUS DUWON CLEMMONS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 27, 2018 order 

of the Court of Appeals, the motion to stay and hold in abeyance, and the motion to 

remand are considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals and the June 23, 2017 order of 

the Jackson Circuit Court denying the defendant's motion for relief from judgment, and 

we REMAND this case to the Jackson Circuit Court for reconsideration of the 

defendant’s motion. We remind the circuit court that its “function is limited when 

reviewing newly discovered evidence, as it is not the ultimate fact-finder,” and that its 

credibility determination “is concerned with whether a reasonable juror could find the 

testimony credible on retrial.” People v Johnson, 502 Mich 541, 567 (2018). On remand, 

the circuit court should consider, in the interest of judicial economy, allowing the 

defendant to supplement his motion with any additional affidavits. The motion to stay

and hold in abeyance is DENIED as moot.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOMECOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,177,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  876,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                   219,055
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,835,476
<PP&E>                                         834,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                 227,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,723,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          873,606
<BONDS>                                      1,700,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           296
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,038,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,723,473
<SALES>                                         62,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,330,975
<CGS>                                           52,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,304,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,222,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               194,894
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,387,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,387,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,387,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.36)
                                                

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3165 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3165

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act to provide for criminal 
liability for willful safety standard violations resulting in the death 
                         of contract employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

   Mr. Al Green of Texas (for himself, Mr. Owens, Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
    Texas, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, and Mr. Waxman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act to provide for criminal 
liability for willful safety standard violations resulting in the death 
                         of contract employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE.

    Section 17(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. 
666(e)) is amended by inserting ``including contract employees who are 
contracted by the employer,'' after ``employee,''.
                                 <all>
```
|         |                                                  |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------|
| • | Registration Statement No. 333-19771 on Form S-8 |

|         |                                                   |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------|
| • | Registration Statement No. 333-103839 on Form S-8 |

|         |                                                   |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------|
| • | Registration Statement No. 333-188789 on Form S-8 |

|         |                                                   |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------|
| • | Registration Statement No. 333-195594 on Form S-8 |

|         |                                                   |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------|
| • | Registration Statement No. 333-195595 on Form S-8 |
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-121443 and No. 333-134389 on Form S-8 and
No. 333-134415 on Form S-3 of our report, dated February 26, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Interline Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
its subsidiaries and the effectiveness of Interline Brands, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment, and FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxesan Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Interline Brands, Inc. for the year ended December 28, 2007.

Jacksonville,
Florida
February 26, 2008

---



QuickLinks
### §51502. Detailing of personnel

At the request of the Governor of a State, the President may detail, without reimbursement, personnel of the Navy, the Coast Guard, and the Maritime Service to a State maritime academy to serve as a superintendent, professor, lecturer, or instructor at the academy.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1577.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 51502 | 46 App.:1295c(e). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title XIII, §1304(e), as added Pub. L. 96–453, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2004. |

Section

The reference to territories is omitted as unnecessary because of the definition of "State" in chapter 1 of the revised title.
#### Zelda Malin, Respondent, v. William J. Ward et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, Supreme Court, Ulster County, which denied a motion for summary judgment. In this action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, plaintiff as purchaser relies on two written instruments subscribed by defendant Ward for compliance with section 259 of the Real Property Law. This section requires “some note or memorandum” of the contract to be subscribed by the party to be charged. The first memorandum recited the receipt from plaintiff of a deposit “on the purchase price of approximately three acres of land, the same situate southeasterly and to the real’ of existing buildings and beginning approximately 25 feet distant from the said buildings and being bounded on the stream line and running to the southeasterly and easterly bounds of the said property which is located on Route 212 in the Town of Woodstock, Ulster County, New York.” The price was fixed at $500 an acre. About a month later defendant Ward subscribed to another memorandum on the payment of an additional amount by plaintiff. This recited that the payment was received as “additional payment on the purchase price of my 2% acres as per contract of” the prior date. This later instrument, read with the first *851one to which it refers, sufficiently identified the land itself; and the quantum and price are definite enough to comply with the statute. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
### §123a. Continuation of existing land districts and offices in Alaska; change of district boundaries, or discontinuance of districts; designation and location of land offices

Subject to the authority conferred upon the Secretary of the Interior by this section, the land districts and land offices existing in Alaska on October 9, 1942 are continued. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and empowered in his discretion to change the boundaries of, or discontinue, any land district in Alaska, and in lieu thereof to designate such land district, or land region, as, in his opinion, is necessary for the transaction of the business relating to the public lands in the Territory and to designate or change the location of any land office for such land district or land region.

(Oct. 9, 1942, ch. 584, §6, 56 Stat. 779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 365 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Land Districts and Land Offices Continued

Provisions of acts Feb. 14, 1902, ch. 17, §1, 32 Stat. 20; Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2537, §1, 34 Stat. 1232, which constituted former section 365 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions, and were repealed by section 7 of Act Oct. 9, 1942, which enacted this section, read as follows: "There shall be two land districts in Alaska, the boundaries of which shall be designated by the President, to be known as the Nome land district and the Fairbanks land district, with the land offices located, respectively, at Nome, Alaska, and Fairbanks, Alaska, and one other land district and land office, the location of which shall be fixed by the President."