alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter 

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 03/20/2012 01:30 PM

Subject: Interagency Comments on latest draft of NSPS EGU preamble

Hi Kevin,

Nathan is home sick today so I’m covering for him.

Attached are comments on the latest draft of the EGU NSPS preamble. These are comments that, as 

discussed last week, would come over early this week. Please note that while most of the suggested 

edits are in the section on transitional sources, there a few edits in other parts of the rule. 

Please call me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

EO 12866 EGU GHG NSPS proposal FR notice 03_13_12 - InteragencycommentsunderEO13563_March20.docx
### SUBCHAPTER VII—PAYMENTS AND REFUNDS
### §1906. Land-grant colleges constituted depositories

Land-grant colleges are constituted depositories to receive Government publications subject to the depository laws.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1284.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §85 (part) (Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2284, §4, 34 Stat. 1014; June 25, 1938, ch. 708, 52 Stat. 1206; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–579, 76 Stat. 354).

This section is from the last paragraph of former section 85; the remainder of that section will be found in section 1903 of the revision.
§ 3285.203 Site Drainage. ( a ) *Purpose.* Drainage must be provided to direct surface water away from the home to protect against erosion of foundation supports and to prevent water build-up under the home, as shown in Figure to § 3285.203.
( b ) The home site must be graded as shown in Figure to § 3285.203, or other methods, such as a drain tile and automatic sump pump system, must be provided to remove any water that may collect under the home.
( c ) All drainage must be diverted away from the home and must slope a minimum of one-half inch per foot away from the foundation for the first ten feet. Where property lines, walls, slopes, or other physical conditions prohibit this slope, the site must be provided with drains or swales or otherwise graded to drain water away from the structure, as shown in Figure to § 3285.203.
( d ) *Sloped site considerations.* The home, where sited, must be protected from surface runoff from the surrounding area.
( e ) Refer to § 3285.902 regarding the use of drainage structures to drain surface runoff.
( f ) *Gutters and downspouts.* Manufacturers must specify in their installation instructions whether the home is suitable for the installation of gutters and downspouts. If suitable, the installation instructions must indicate that when gutters and downspouts are installed, the runoff must be directed away from the home.
Exhibit 23.1

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-117051) of Rand Logistics, Inc., of our report dated July
12, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Rand Logistics,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006 and the three month period then
ended, which appears in this Form 10-KSB filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Hamilton, Canada
July 12, 2006
### §2909. Retention of records

The Archivist may empower a Federal agency to retain records for a longer period than that specified in disposal schedules, and may withdraw disposal authorizations covering records listed in disposal schedules. The Archivist shall promulgate regulations in accordance with section 2104(a) of this title to implement this section.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1297; Pub. L. 91–287, §4, June 23, 1970, 84 Stat. 322; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(15)(B), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2288; Pub. L. 108–383, §2(a), Oct. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2218.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §395(f) (June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title V, §505(f), as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(d), 64 Stat. 583).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–383 struck out ", upon the submission of evidence of need," after "Federal agency", substituted ", and" for "; and, in accordance with regulations promulgated by him,", and inserted at end "The Archivist shall promulgate regulations in accordance with section 2104(a) of this title to implement this section."

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist" for "Administrator of General Services".

1970—Pub. L. 91–287 struck out "approved by Congress" after "disposal schedules" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Aspeon, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The  Quarterly  Report  Form 10QSB for the three  months  and six  months  ended
December  31,  2003 of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1034,
and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       October 26, 2005

By /s/David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge

for the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and

recommendation of the Honorable David L. Piester, United States

Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska.

___________

No. 95-1572

___________

Enebiene P. Ijoma, *

*

Appellant, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * and Order of the Immigration

* and Naturalization Service.

Immigration and Naturalization *

Service, (Omaha District) * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 31, 1996

 Filed: February 6, 1996 ___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Enebiene P. Ijoma, a citizen of Nigeria, appeals the District

Court's1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of

habeas corpus. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the

parties' submissions, we conclude the judgment of the District

Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30984

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

PHILLIP K. SIAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

No. 6:99-CR-60034

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Phillip Sias, federal prisoner # 10304-035, appeals the denial of his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion seeking reduction of sentence based on Amendment
No. 06-30984

2

599 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Sias pleaded guilty of using

and carrying a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment.

Because he was not sentenced on his conviction under § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) in conjunction with any other conviction, Amendment 599 is not applicable to him, and

the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion was not an abuse of discretion. See U.S.S.G.

App. C, amend. 599; United States v. Pardue, 36 F.3d 429, 430 (5th Cir. 1994).

Sias’s appeal lacks arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983) (per curiam); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

Sias filed a § 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 598 to the guidelines,

advancing essentially the same argument presented in his current motion. His

appeal from the denial of that motion was dismissed as frivolous. Sias is cautioned that further frivolous filings may resultin the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal, monetary penalties, and restrictions on his ability to file appeals in this court and actions in any court subject to this court’s jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Page 1 

 [Proposed] Order of Dismissal: C 09-02114 RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GREGORY BENDER, 

 

 Plaintiff,

vs. 

LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., a 

Delaware corporation, NEC 

CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a 

Delaware corporation, PIONEER 

ELECTRONICS (USA) INC., a 

Delaware corporation, and SHARP 

ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, a New 

York corporation, 

 

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 09-02114 RS 

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration of the Stipulated Motion 

for Dismissal of any and all claims which could be asserted by 

plaintiff Gregory Bender against defendant NEC Corporation of 

North America and of any and all claims which could be asserted 

by defendant NEC Corporation of North America against plaintiff 

David N. Kuhn - State Bar No. 73389 

Attorney-at-Law 

144 Hagar Avenue 

Piedmont, CA 94611 

Telephone:(510)653-4983 

E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net 

Attorney for plaintiff Gregory Bender

*E-Filed 7/20/10*

Case 3:09-cv-02114-RS Document 93 Filed 07/20/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 

 [Proposed] Order of Dismissal: C 09-02114 RS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Gregory Bender in this action, with prejudice, and the Court 

being of the opinion that said motion should be GRANTED, it is 

hereby 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that any and all claims which 

could be asserted in this action by plaintiff Gregory Bender 

against defendant NEC Corporation of North America and any and 

all claims which could be asserted by defendant NEC Corporation 

of North America against plaintiff Gregory Bender are hereby 

dismissed, with prejudice. 

It is further ORDERED that all costs and expenses and 

attorneys’ fees are to be borne by the party that incurred them. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:_____________________ ____________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

7/20/10

Case 3:09-cv-02114-RS Document 93 Filed 07/20/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 103.330 Prohibitions and requirements with respect to disclosure of information obtained during conciliation. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and § 103.230(c), nothing that is said or done in the course of conciliation under this part may be made public or used as evidence in a subsequent administrative hearing under part 180 or in civil actions under title VIII of the Fair Housing Act, without the written consent of the persons concerned.
( b ) Conciliation agreements shall be made public, unless the aggrieved person and respondent request nondisclosure and the Assistant Secretary determines that disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the Fair Housing Act. Notwithstanding a determination that disclosure of a conciliation agreement is not required, the Assistant Secretary may publish tabulated descriptions of the results of all conciliation efforts.
[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996]
### §730. Distribution of documents to Members of Congress

When, in the division among Senators, and Representatives, of documents printed for the use of Congress there is an apportionment to each or either House in round numbers, the Director of the Government Publishing Office may not deliver the full number so accredited at the Senate Service Department and House of Representatives Publications Distribution Service, but only the largest multiple of the number constituting the full membership of that House, including the Secretary and Sergeant at Arms of the Senate and Clerk and Sergeant at Arms of the House, which is contained in the round numbers thus accredited to that House, so that the number delivered divides evenly and without remainder among the Members of the House to which they are delivered; and the remainder of the documents thus resulting shall be turned over to the Superintendent of Documents, to be distributed by him, first, to public and school libraries for the purpose of completing broken sets; second, to public and school libraries that have not been supplied with any portions of the sets, and, lastly, by sale to other persons; the libraries to be named to him by Senators and Representatives; and in this distribution the Superintendent of Documents, as far as practicable, shall make an equal allowance to each Senator and Representative.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1253; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §223(3), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1751; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §157 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §68, 28 Stat. 612; Apr. 6, 1904, ch. 862, 33 Stat. 159; July 2, 1954, ch. 455, title I, §101, 68 Stat. 397).

"House of Representatives Publications Distribution Service" is substituted for "House Folding Room" because of the change of name under authority of Public Law 88–652.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "and Sergeant at Arms" for ", Sergeant at Arms, and Doorkeeper".
Document

Exhibit 10.1
Amendment No. 5
to
Clinical and Commercial Supply Agreement
Viral Vector Product
This Amendment No. 5 to the Clinical and Commercial Supply Agreement-Viral Vector Product (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of the date of last signature below, (“Amendment Effective Date”) by and between bluebird bio (Switzerland) GmbH (“Company”), and SAFC Carlsbad, Inc., (“SAFC”). Company and SAFC may hereinafter be referred to as a Party or as the Parties. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.
WHEREAS, Company and SAFC are parties to that certain Clinical and Commercial Supply Agreement-Viral Vector Product, as amended, dated November 27, 2017, and having an Effective Date of January 1, 2018 (the “Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend and correct Amendment #4 dated 30 March 2022.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the amount and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


1.    The following WHEREAS clause is hereby added to Amendment#4 as the third WHEREAS clause as follows:


“WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the commercial model provided for in the Agreement, known as the “Batch Model”, shall expire on the Amendment Effective Date and shall be modified and replaced in its entirety, unless otherwise specifically stated otherwise, by a mutually agreed upon commercial model known as the “Capacity Reservation Model” as outlined in Task Order #52 as of the Amendment Effective Date until expiration of the Term.


2.    This Amendment, together with the Agreement, constitutes the final, complete and exclusive agreement between the Parties pertaining to its subject matter and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous understandings or agreements of the parties with respect thereto.


3.    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute a single instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to this Amendment by telecopier or other electronic means (e.g., via PDF) shall be effective delivery of a manually executed counterpart of this Amendment.


4.    Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and are in full force and effect.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have each caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment Effective Date above.


															
					
	SAFC CARLSBAD, INC.		bluebird bio (Switzerland) GmbH
					
	By:	/s/ Lisa Freeman-Cook    10-Aug-2022
		By:	/s/ Jason Cole            10-Aug-2022

	Name:	Lisa Freeman-Cook		Name:	Jason Cole
	Title:	Interim Site Head		Title:	Director
### §3312. Photographs or microphotographs of records considered as originals; certified reproductions admissible in evidence

Photographs, microphotographs of records, or digitized records made in compliance with regulations under section 3302 of this title shall have the same effect as the originals and shall be treated as originals for the purpose of their admissibility in evidence. Certified or authenticated reproductions of the photographs, microphotographs, or digitized records shall be admitted in evidence equally with the original photographs, microphotographs, or digitized records.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 113–187, §5(e), Nov. 26, 2014, 128 Stat. 2010.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §378 (July 7, 1943, ch. 192, §13, 57 Stat. 382).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–187 substituted "Photographs, microphotographs of records, or digitized records" for "Photographs or microphotographs of records" and substituted "photographs, microphotographs, or digitized records" for "photographs or microphotographs" in two places.
Exhibit 8.1
 List of Significant Subsidiaries and Affiliates of Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd.
 Name of Subsidiary or Affiliate
    
    State or Jurisdiction of IncorporationBeijing Hurray! Times Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray! Solutions Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Cool Young Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Enterprise Network Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing WVAS Solutions Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Palmsky Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hutong Wuxian Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaShanghai Magma Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hengji Weiye Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaShanghai Saiyu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHenan Yinshan Digital Network Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray! Digital Media Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Huayi Brothers Music Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray! Freeland Digital Music Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing New Run Entertainment Development Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaGuangzhou Hurray! Secular Bird Culture Communication Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaBeijing Hurray! Fly Songs International Culture Co., Ltd.
    
    Peoples Republic of ChinaHurray Technologies (HK) Ltd.
    
    Hong Kong
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–41

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 91, A RESOLUTION PROVIDING AMOUNTS FOR THE EXPENSES OF CERTAIN COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE 105TH CONGRESS

MARCH 20, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 105]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 105, by a 9–2 vote, report the same to the House with

the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of House Resolution

91, a resolution providing amounts for the expenses of certain committees of the House of Representatives in the 105th Congress

under a closed rule. The rule provides one hour of debate divided

equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on House Oversight.

The rule also provides for consideration of the resolution in the

House without intervention of any point of order and that the

amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of

House Resolution 102 be considered as adopted.

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit.

COMMITTEE VOTES

Pursuant to clause 2(l)(2)(B) of House rule XI the results of each

rollcall vote on an amendment or motion to report, together with

the names of those voting for and against, are printed below:

Rules Committee Rollcall No. 13

Date: March 20, 1997.
2

Measure: Rule for House Resolution 91, Providing Amounts for

the Expenses of Certain Committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Motion by: Mr. Moakley.

Summary of motion: Make in order an amendment to fund the

Government Reform and Oversight Committee at a freeze level

through May 2, 1997.

Results: Rejected, 2–9.

Vote by Members: Dreier—Nay; Goss—Nay; Linder—Nay;

Pryce—Nay; Diaz-Balart—Nay; McInnis—Nay; Hastings—Nay;

Myrick—Nay; Moakley—Yea; Frost—Yea; Solomon—Nay.

Rules Committee Rollcall No. 14

Date: March 20, 1997.

Measure: Rules for House Resolution 91, Providing Amounts for

the Expenses of Certain Committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Motion by: Mr. Frost.

Summary of motion: Make in order an amendment to strike the

reserve fund provision.

Results: Rejected, 2–9.

Vote by Members: Dreier—Nay; Goss—Nay; Linder—Nay;

Pryce—Nay; Diaz-Balart—Nay; McInnis—Nay; Hastings—Nay;

Myrick—Nay; Moakley—Yea; Frost—Yea; Solomon—Nay.

Rules Committee Rollcall No. 15

Date: March 20, 1997.

Measure: Rule for House Resolution 91, Providing Amounts for

the Expenses of Certain Committees of the House of Representatives in the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

Motion by: Mr. Dreier.

Summary of motion: To report rule to the House.

Results: Adopted, 9–2.

Vote by Members: Dreier—Yea; Goss—Yea; Linder—Yea; Pryce—

Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea; McInnis—Yea; Hastings—Yea; Myrick—

Yea; Moakley—Nay; Frost—Nay; Solomon—Yea.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    March 30, 2011
### §1313. Fees

#### (a) Investment banking firm fees

The Secretary of Transportation, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, shall agree to pay to investment banking firms and other persons participating with such firms in the public offering the absolute minimum amount in fees necessary to carry out the public offering.

#### (b) Costs of public offering

All costs of the public offering payable by the Secretary of Transportation shall be paid from the proceeds of the public offering.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, §4013, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1897.)