alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 247.3 Entitlement of tenants to occupancy. ( a ) *General.* The landlord may not terminate any tenancy in a subsidized project except upon the following grounds: ( 1 ) Material noncompliance with the rental agreement,
( 2 ) Material failure to carry out obligations under any state landlord and tenant act,
( 3 ) Criminal activity by a covered person in accordance with sections 5.858 and 5.859, or alcohol abuse by a covered person in accordance with section 5.860. If necessary, criminal records can be obtained for lease enforcement purposes under section 5.903(d)(3).
( 4 ) Other good cause. No termination by a landlord under paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section shall be valid to the extent it is based upon a rental agreement or a provision of state law permitting termination of a tenancy without good cause. No termination shall be valid unless it is in accordance with the provisions of § 247.4.
( b ) *Notice of good cause.* The conduct of a tenant cannot be deemed other good cause under § 247.3(a)(4) unless the landlord has given the tenant prior notice that said conduct shall henceforth constitute a basis for termination of occupancy. Said notice shall be served on the tenant in the same manner as that provided for termination notices in § 247.4(b).
( c ) *Material noncompliance.* The term *material noncompliance with the rental agreement* includes: ( 1 ) One or more substantial violations of the rental agreement;
( 2 ) Repeated minor violations of the rental agreement that: ( i ) Disrupt the livability of the project,
( ii ) Adversely affect the health or safety of any person or the right of any tenant to the quiet enjoyment of the leased premises and related project facilities,
( iii ) Interfere with the management of the project, or
( iv ) Have an adverse financial effect on the project;
( 3 ) If the tenant: ( i ) Fails to supply on time all required information on the income and composition, or eligibility factors, of the tenant household, as provided in 24 CFR part 5; or
( ii ) Knowingly provides incomplete or inaccurate information as required under these provisions; and
( 4 ) Non-payment of rent or any other financial obligation due under the rental agreement (including any portion thereof) beyond any grace period permitted under State law, except that the payment of rent or any other financial obligation due under the rental agreement after the due date, but within the grace period permitted under State law, constitutes a minor violation.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0204) [41 FR 43330, Sept. 30, 1976. Redesignated at 49 FR 6713, Feb. 23, 1984, and amended at 54 FR 39697, Sept. 27, 1989; 56 FR 7531, Feb. 22, 1991; 61 FR 13624, Mar. 27, 1996; 61 FR 47382, Sept. 6, 1996; 66 FR 28797, May 24, 2001]
### §1319. Geological Survey: specific appropriations required for monographs and bulletins

The scientific reports known as the monographs and bulletins of the Geological Survey may not be published until specific and detailed estimates and specific appropriations based on these estimates are made for them. Engravings for the annual reports for monographs and bulletins, or of illustrations, sections, and maps, may not be made until specific estimates are submitted and specific appropriations made based on the estimates.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1269.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §261 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §79, 28 Stat. 621; June 7, 1924, ch. 303, 43 Stat. 592).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Geological Survey redesignated United States Geological Survey by provision of title I of Pub. L. 102–154, set out as a note under section 31 of Title 43, Public Lands.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 85198 

FILED 

NOV 1 0 2U22 

BOBBIE PRICE; SUZANNE LOVELY; 

AND BRADLEY BAILEY, 

Appellants, 

vs. 

LOREN YOUNGMAN, AN 

INDIVIDUAL; EMMANUEL 

BARRIENTOS; AND BELEM CAZARES, 

Respondents. 

srOWN 

EME COURI 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a 

motion for summary judgment in an action relating to real property. Eighth 

Judicial District Court, Clark County; Christy L. Craig, Judge. 

Respondents Emmanuel Barrientos and Belem Cazares 

(hereinafter Barrientos) have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. 

Barrientos asserts that the challenged order is not appealable under NRAP 

3 because their claims against Wayne Grimes and Tri-State Collection & 

Foreclosure Services, LLC, remain pending. It appears the challenged 

order resolves the claims against Tri-State Collection & Foreclosure 

Services where the order states that all interests of Tri-State Collection & 

Foreclosure Services, LLC have been terminated as the result of the 

foreclosure sale. However, it does not appear that the order resolves the 

claims against Grimes. Accordingly, it does not appear that the order is 

appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV 

Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) ("[A] final judgment is 

one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing 

for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 1947A ceW3r.., 

-CZ - 35-co 7-
such as attorney's fees and costs."). And no other statute or court rule 

appears to authorize an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. 

MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this 

court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). 

Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1

Sr. J. 

Pickering Gi bons 

cc: Hon. Christy L. Craig, District Judge 

Bobbie Price 

Bradley Bailey 

Suzanne Lovely 

Loren Youngman 

Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'Appellants may file a new notice of appeal once the district court 

enters a final judgment resolving all claims asserted in the district court. 

The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this 

matter under a general order of assignment. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

101 I947A <WO. 

2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONARD SCOTT,

Petitioner,

v.

MATTHEW CATES, Secretary of 

Corrections, 

Respondent. /

No. C 09-2789 SI (pr)

JUDGMENT

This action is dismissed because the petition for writ of habeas corpus was not filed

before the expiration of the habeas statute of limitations period.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

DATED: May 3, 2010 _______________________

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02789-SI Document 16 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 193

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Lawrence Alexander Harris, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20230033

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick , Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Dennis H. Ingold, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND

, for plaintiff and appellee

.
Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, ND

, for defendant and appellant.1 State v. Harris No. 20230033

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Lawrence Alexander Harris appeals from a criminal judgment and a
district court order denying his motion to suppress evidence. On appeal, Harris argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence from the traffic stop of the vehicle in which he was a passenger because the officers did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion to conduct the stop. We
conclude the district court did not err in denying Harris’ motion to suppress because there was reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle

.
[¶2] While not argued in the district court, Harris also argues on appeal there was no reasonable and articulable basis to detain him following the stop of the vehicle. We decline to address this argument. State v. Dockter

, 2019 ND 203, ¶ 8, 932 N.W.2d 98 (issues not raised or considered in the district court will not be addressed on appeal). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)( 2 ) and (7)

.
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
### §794. Tax payments to States

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no railroad in reorganization shall withhold from any State, or any political subdivision thereof, the payment of the portion of any tax owed by such railroad to such State or subdivision, which portion has been collected by such railroad from any tenant thereof.

(b) Any railroad which violates the provisions of subsection (a) of this section by withholding any portion of a tax referred to in such subsection shall be fined not more than $10,000 for each such violation.

(Pub. L. 93–236, title VI, §605, as added Pub. L. 94–5, §9, Feb. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 9.)
#### In re BROOKLYN ELEVATED R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 17, 1905.)

In the matter of the petition of the Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company relative to acquiring title to real estate, etc., on Myrtle avenue in the city of Brooklyn, No opinion. ■ Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
```

                                  UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                               Washington, D.C.  20549

                                                      FORM 8-K
                                                  CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):   December 11, 2002

                        N A V I S T A R    I N T E R N A T I O N A L    C O R P O R A T I O N
                               (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                Delaware                                   1-9618                              36-3359573
     (State or other jurisdiction of               (Commission File No.)                   (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)                                                       Identification No.)

   4201 Winfield Road, P.O. Box 1488, Warrenville, Illinois                                       60555
         (Address of principal executive offices)                                              (Zip Code)

                          Registrant's telephone number, including area code (630) 753-5000

PAGE 2

ITEM 5.    OTHER EVENTS

           On December 11, 2002,  the  Registrant  issued the press  release,  which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to
           this Report and incorporated by reference herein.

ITEM 7.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

                  (c)      Exhibits

                            Exhibit No.        Description                                              Page

                              99.1              Press Release dated                                      E-1
                                                December 11, 2002

                                                    SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
          Registrant

Date:    December 11, 2002                  /s/  Mark T. Schwetschenau
                                                 Mark T. Schwetschenau
                                                 Vice President and Controller
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)

         PAGE 3

                                                 INDEX TO EXHIBITS

                            Exhibit No.        Description                                              Page

                              99.1              Press Release dated                                      E-1
                                                December 11, 2002
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD DUTTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 05-3107 CRB 

ORDER TO DEFENDANT GENERAL 

ELECTRIC AND PLAINTIFFS 

REGARDING STATUS OF 

SETTLEMENTS

This Order Relates To:

Clemmer, 05-3107 CRB

Alexander, 05-4945 CRB

Cody, 06-0843 CRB

Cervenka, 06-6949 CRB

Huff, 08-4490 CRB

Hulsen, 09-2012 CRB

Bullock, 09-3185 CRB

Jackson, 09-3186 CRB

Jones, 09-3953 CRB

Brown, 09-4681 CRB

Mack, 10- 1729 CRB

Gilpin, 11-3564 CRB

Huff, 11-3772 CRB

Shelly, 11-5597 CRB

Duenas, 12-0714 CRB

Lowe, 12-5227 CRB

McMeans, 13-0937 CRB

Plaintiffs and General Electric have advised the Court that the above cases have settled; 

however, as of the date of this Order dismissals of the cases or of the claims against General 

Electric have not been filed. Accordingly, on or before July 22, 2016, the parties shall file 

dismissals in the above actions or, if no dismissal can be filed, a joint statement explaining the 

status of the settlement in each still pending action.

Case 3:09-cv-02012-CRB Document 23 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2016

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02012-CRB Document 23 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2
### §8855. Forest Service leases and permits

It is the intent of the Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture shall process applications for leases of National Forest System lands and for permits to explore, drill, and develop resources on land leased from the Forest Service, notwithstanding the current status of any plan being prepared under section 1604 of title 16.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title II, §262, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 710.)
### §620l. Net power revenues

In planning the use of, and in using credits from, net power revenues available for the purpose of assisting in the pay-out of costs of participating projects herein and hereafter authorized in the States of Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, the Secretary shall have regard for the achievement within each of said States of the fullest practicable use of the waters of the Upper Colorado River system, consistent with the apportionment thereof among such States.

(Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, §13, 70 Stat. 110.)
### §§642 to 644. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section 642, Pub. L. 91–518, title VIII, §802, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1340, prohibited discontinuance of intercity rail passenger service other than in accordance with provisions of this chapter. See section 24705 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 643, Pub. L. 91–518, title VIII, §803, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1340, related to separability of provisions of this chapter.

Section 644, Pub. L. 91–518, title VIII, §805, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1340; Pub. L. 92–316, §11, June 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 233; Pub. L. 93–496, §11, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1531; Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §4007(a), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 108, related to records and audit of National Railroad Passenger Corporation and certain railroads. See section 24315 of Title 49, Transportation.
```

[House Report 110-520]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-520

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
                                 RULES

                                _______
                                

  January 28, 2008.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 941]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 941, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any resolution reported on the legislative day of January 
29, 2008, providing for consideration of a bill to provide 
economic stimulus through recovery rebates to individuals, 
incentives for business investment, and an increase in 
conforming and FHA loan limits.

                                  

```
§ 100.85 Blockbusting. ( a ) It shall be unlawful, for profit, to induce or attempt to induce a person to sell or rent a dwelling by representations regarding the entry or prospective entry into the neighborhood of a person or persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin or with a handicap.
( b ) In establishing a discriminatory housing practice under this section it is not necessary that there was in fact profit as long as profit was a factor for engaging in the blockbusting activity.
( c ) Prohibited actions under this section include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Engaging, for profit, in conduct (including uninvited solicitations for listings) which conveys to a person that a neighborhood is undergoing or is about to undergo a change in the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of persons residing in it, in order to encourage the person to offer a dwelling for sale or rental.
( 2 ) Encouraging, for profit, any person to sell or rent a dwelling through assertions that the entry or prospective entry of persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin, or with handicaps, can or will result in undesirable consequences for the project, neighborhood or community, such as a lowering of property values, an increase in criminal or antisocial behavior, or a decline in the quality of schools or other services or facilities.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer 48
### §142. Rights of occupants or claimants of oil- or gas-bearing lands; exceptions to withdrawals

This section and section 141 1 of this title shall not be construed as a recognition, abridgment, or enlargement of any asserted rights or claims initiated upon any oil- or gas-bearing lands after any withdrawal of such lands made prior to June 25, 1910: And provided further, That there shall be excepted from the force and effect of any withdrawal made under the provisions of this section and section 141 1 of this title all lands which are, on the date of such withdrawal, embraced in any lawful homestead or desert-land entry theretofore made, or upon which any valid settlement has been made and is at said date being maintained and perfected pursuant to law; but the terms of this proviso shall not continue to apply to any particular tract of land unless the entryman or settler shall continue to comply with the law under which the entry or settlement was made.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 421, §2, 36 Stat. 847; Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 369, 37 Stat. 497; Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 141 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.

#### Codification

Act Aug. 24, 1912, substituted "metalliferous minerals" for "minerals other than coal, oil, gas, and phosphates" in the first clause of this section, and "June 25, 1910" for "the passage of this Act" in the second proviso of this section.

In the last proviso of this section, "national forest" substituted for "forest reserve", in view of act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1269, providing that forest reserves should be known as national forests.

The provisions of the last proviso of this section were also classified to section 471 of Title 16, Conservation.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–579 struck out provisions that all lands withdrawn under the act of June 25, 1910, be open to exploration, occupation, and purchase under the mineral laws of the United States in respect to minerals other than coal, oil, gas, and phosphates and that no national forest be created or additions thereto made to those created before Aug. 24, 1912, in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Colorado, or Wyoming, except by Act of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the amendment made by section 704(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.