alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Quincy Railway Company, appellant, v. John Musolino, appellee.

Suit for damages to street ear by collision with automobile truck. Judgment for street car company. Appeal from the County Court of Adams county; the Hon. W. *Y.*Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed April 23, 1923.

William H. Schlagenhauf and John E. Wall, for appellant. John P. Garner, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
### Part C—Statistical Efficiency
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128325 & (42) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128325 

 COA: 252727 
 Wayne CC: 03-008761-01 

WENDELL GREEN, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 

2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion 

to remand is DENIED. 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
### §390g–2. Phase II of groundwater recharge demonstration program

#### (a) Design, construction, and operation of projects

During phase II, and subject to State water laws and interstate water compacts, the Bureau is authorized and directed to design, construct, and operate demonstration projects in the High Plains States and other Reclamation Act States to recharge groundwater systems as recommended in the report referred to in subsection (c).

#### (b) Alternative means of cost allocation; economic feasibility of projects

During phase II the Secretary, acting through the Bureau, shall contract with the various High Plains States and other Reclamation Act States to conduct a study to identify and evaluate alternative means by which the costs of groundwater recharge projects could be allocated among the beneficiaries of the projects within the respective States and identify and evaluate the economic feasibility of and the legal authority for utilizing groundwater recharge in water resource development projects.

#### (c) Reports to Congress

(1) Within twelve months after the initiation of phase II, and at annual intervals thereafter, the Secretary shall submit interim reports to Congress. Each report shall contain a detailed statement of his findings and progress respecting the design, construction, and operation of the demonstration projects referred to in subsection (a) and the study referred to in subsection (b).

(2) Within five years after the initiation of phase II, the Secretary shall submit a summary report to Congress. The summary report shall contain—

(A) a detailed evaluation of the demonstration projects referred to in subsection (a);

(B) the results of the studies referred to in subsection (b);

(C) specific recommendations regarding the location, scope, and feasibility of operational groundwater recharge projects to be constructed and maintained by the Bureau; and

(D) an evaluation of the feasibility of integrating these groundwater recharge projects into existing reclamation projects.

(3) In addition to recommendations made under section 390g–1 of this title, the Secretary shall make additional recommendations for design, construction, and operation of demonstration projects. Such projects are authorized to be designed, constructed, and operated in accordance with subsection (a).

(4) Each project under this section shall terminate five years after the date on which construction on the project is completed.

(5) At the conclusion of phase II the Secretary shall submit a final report to the Congress which shall include, but not be limited to, a detailed evaluation of the projects under this section.

(Pub. L. 98–434, §4, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1676; Pub. L. 102–575, title XXVI, §2601(1), (2), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4689.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–575 substituted "summary report" for "final report" in two places in introductory provisions of par. (2) and added pars. (3) to (5).
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.202 Primary inspection agency contracts.

Each manufacturer shall enter into a contract or other agreement with as many Design Inspection Primary Inspection Agencies (DAPIAs) as it wishes and with enough Production Inspection Primary Inspection Agencies (IPIAs) to provide IPIA services for each manufacturing plant as set out in this subpart and in subpart H of this part. In return for the services provided by the DAPIAs and IPIAs, each manufacturer shall pay such reasonable fees as are agreed upon between the manufacturer and the primary inspection agency or, in the case of a State acting as an exclusive IPIA under § 3282.3 such fees as may be established by the State.
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Communication, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M.
Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  August 8, 2006            /s/ John M. Lowber
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 John M. Lowber
                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                 General Communication, Inc.
§ 87.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
### Database for the east half of "Preliminary Geologic Map of the Blythe 30' by 60' quadrangle, California and Arizona"

By: Paul Stone**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds225

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund IV L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter
Management Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By: /s/Lee Horwitz

Name:	  Lee Horwitz
Title: Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
       the general partner of the Partnership

Date:	  November 14, 2006
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G.  Lehmann,  a First Vice  President of  Washington  Mutual  Mortgage
Securities Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-CB2;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and
the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 29, 2005

                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     First Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF 51JOB, INC. AS OF MAY 31, 2006

51net.com Inc.
51net HR
51net Beijing
Wang Jin Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Qianjin Network Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Qianjin Advertising Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Shanghai Qianjin
  Culture Communication Co., Ltd.)
Wuhan Mei Hao Qian Cheng Advertising Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Meijin Advertising Co., Ltd.
Kunming Mei Hao Qian Cheng Advertising Co., Ltd.
Dalian Mei Hao Qian Cheng Advertising Co., Ltd.
Chongqing Qian Cheng Wu You Advertising Co., Ltd.
Hefei Wu You Culture Communication Co., Ltd.
Ningbo Qianjin Culture Advertising Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Cheng An Human Resources Co., Ltd.
Beijing Qian Cheng Si Jin Advertising Co., Ltd.
Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Run An Lian Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.
Qian Cheng Wu You Network Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Wang Cai Advertising Co., Ltd. (formerly known as Shanghai Jin Lian
  Advertising Co., Ltd.)
#### In the Matter of Salbeth Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Frank M. Volz et al., Constituting the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Babylon, Respondents.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to annul a determination by the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Babylon, denying the application of the petitioner, a contract vendee, for a variance and a building permit for a plot lacking the prescribed minimum area and frontage, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated August 31, 1961, which dismissed the proceeding on the merits and confirmed the board’s determination. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §11204. Processing fees

(a) Collection of Fees.—The Secretary, or in the case of personnel of the Army Transport Service or the Naval Transport Service, the Secretary of Defense, shall collect a fee of $30 from each applicant for processing an application submitted under section 11203(a) of this title.

(b) Treatment of Fees Collected.—Amounts received by the Secretary under this section shall be deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury as offsetting receipts of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating and ascribed to Coast Guard activities. Amounts received by the Secretary of Defense under this section shall be deposited in the General Fund of the Treasury as offsetting receipts of the Department of Defense. In either case, such amounts shall be available, subject to appropriation, for the administrative costs of processing applications under section 11203 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 105–368, title IV, §402(a), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3337.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
Exhibit 10.06






Exhibit 10.06




GLU MOBILE INC.




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION TERMS




KAL IYER




The following is a summary of the compensation terms for Kal Iyer, our Senior Vice President,
Research and Development:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Salary:

	 	$240,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Target Cash Bonus:

	 	40% of base salary

	 
	 	 	 	 
	Bonus Plan Participation:

	 	Glu Mobile 2010 Executive Bonus Plan
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

In
connection with the Annual Report of Sealy Mattress Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending November 28, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David J. McIlquham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and James B. Hirshorn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



February 28,
2005

| |  | /s/DAVID J. MCILQUHAMDavid J. McIlquham
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/JAMES B. HIRSHORNJames B. Hirshorn
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)  

---
### Part I—State Boating Safety Programs
### §30907. Procedure for hearing and determination

(a) In General.—A civil action under this chapter shall proceed and be heard and determined according to the principles of law and the rules of practice applicable in like cases between private parties.

(b) In Rem.—

(1) Requirements.—The action may proceed according to the principles of an action in rem if—

(A) the plaintiff elects in the complaint; and

(B) it appears that an action in rem could have been maintained had the vessel or cargo been privately owned and possessed.

(2) Effect on relief in personam.—An election under paragraph (1) does not prevent the plaintiff from seeking relief in personam in the same action.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1518.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30907(a) | 46 App.:743 (1st, 4th sentences). | Mar. 9, 1920, ch. 95, §3 (1st, 4th–6th sentences), 41 Stat. 526. |
| 30907(b) | 46 App.:743 (5th, 6th sentences). | |

Section

In subsection (a), the text of 46 App. U.S.C. 743 (4th sentence) is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b)(1)(A), the words "plaintiff" and "complaint" are substituted for "libelant" and "libel", respectively, for consistency with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.).

In subsection (b)(2), the words "in any proper case" are omitted as unnecessary.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 235 (Monday, December 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-
Import Bank of the United States.

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, December 17, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via teleconference.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to public observation by 
teleconference only.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Proposal to Consider Changes to Content 
Policy with Respect to the Program on China and Transformational 
Exports.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). 
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via audio only 
teleconference should register via https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/3683174148646534924 by noon Wednesday, December 16, 2020. 
Individuals will be directed to a Webinar registration page and 
provided call-in information.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26927 Filed 12-3-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
J. 

esty 

Parraguirre 

012° 

Cherry 

2 

Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioner 

has not met his burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted. See 

id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1). 

It is so ORDERED. 

cc: Laszlo Schoka 

Attorney General/Dep't of Public Safety/Carson City 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

EME
§ 2004.29 Fees. ( a ) *Generally.* The Counsel may condition the production of records or appearance for testimony upon advance payment of a reasonable estimate of the costs to OIG.
( b ) *Fees for records.* Fees for producing records will include fees for searching, reviewing, and duplicating records, costs of attorney time spent in reviewing the demand or request, and expenses generated by materials and equipment used to search for, produce, and copy the responsive information. Costs for employee time will be calculated on the basis of the hourly pay of the employee (including all pay, allowance, and benefits). Fees for duplication will be the same as those charged by OIG in its Freedom of Information Act Regulations at 24 CFR part 2002.
( c ) *Witness fees.* Fees for attendance by a witness will include fees, expenses, and allowances prescribed by the court's rules. If no such fees are prescribed, witness fees will be determined based upon the rule of the federal district court closest to the location where the witness will appear. Such fees will include cost of time spent by the witness to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( d ) *Payment of fees.* You must pay any applicable witness fees for current OIG employees and any records certification fees by submitting to the Counsel a check or money order for the appropriate amount made payable to the Treasury of the United States. In the case of testimony by former OIG employees, you must pay applicable fees directly to the former employee in accordance with applicable statutes.
( e ) *Waiver or reduction of fees.* The Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may, upon a showing of reasonable cause, waive or reduce any fees in connection with the testimony or production of records. Additionally, fees will not be assessed if the total charge would be $10.00 or less.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HENRY R. HU and STEPHANIE F. HU, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LANEY LEE, JASON WANG, STEWARD 

WANG, ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY 

HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING MARK, I95 MALL OF ASIA INC., A.T.E.C. 

HOLDING INC., AMERICAN PRODUCTS 

EXHIBITION & EXCHANGE CENTER 

(U.S.A.), INC., ETRADE GUARANTEE 

ASSURANCE CORP., EASY EXPRESS 

SERVICES CORP., KATHY WANG, RUNAN 

ZHANG, ANDY TING, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09-2588 SC 

AMENDED ORDER RE: DEFENDANT 

RUNAN ZHANG'S NOTICE OF 

MOTION AND MOTION TO EXTEND

TIME, MOTION TO DISMISS, 

MOTION TO STRIKE

 The Court has received Defendant Runan Zhang's ex parte 

motion, entitled Notice of Motion and Motion to Extend Time, Motion 

to Dismiss, Motion to Strike ("Zhang Motion"). Defendant Runan 

Zhang is ordered to resubmit the Zhang Motion in compliance with 

General Order No. 45, regarding Electronic Case Filing, no later 

than Wednesday, February 10, 2010. 

 Plaintiff Henry R. Hu and Stephanie F. Hu ("Plaintiffs") must 

submit a partial response to the Zhang Motion no later than 

Tuesday, February 16, 2010. This response need only address the 

question of whether this Court should grant Defendant Runan Zhang's 

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 42 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

request to retroactively extend the deadline for responding to 

Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint; it need not address the 

merits of the Zhang Motion with regard to the motions to dismiss 

and strike. Alternatively, Plaintiffs may file a statement of nonopposition to the Zhang Motion. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 8, 2010 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 42 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2