alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2002.15 Time limitations. ( a ) *General.* Upon receipt of a request for records, the appropriate Assistant Inspector General or an appointed designee will generally make a determination whether to comply with a FOIA request within 20 working days. The Assistant Inspector General or designee will immediately notify the requestor in writing of the determination and the reason(s) for such determination and the right of the person to request assistance from the FOIA Public Liaison. The 20-day period will begin on the day the request is received by the OIG, but in any event not later than 10 working days after the request is received by any component designated to receive FOIA requests, and after any fees or advance payment of fees under § 2002.13 has been made.
( b ) *Scope of responsive records.* In determining which records are responsive to a request, an agency ordinarily will include only records in its possession as of the date that it begins its search. If any other date is used, the agency must inform the requester of that date. A record that is excluded from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c) is not considered responsive to a request.
( c ) *Unusual circumstances.* Under unusual circumstances, as specified in this paragraph (c), the OIG may extend the time period for processing a FOIA request. In such circumstances, the OIG will provide the requester with written notice setting forth the unusual circumstances for the extension and the date on which a determination is expected to be made. This date will not exceed 10 working days beyond the general time established in paragraph (a) of this section. If processing a request would require more than 10 working days beyond the general time limit established in paragraph (a) of this section, the OIG will offer the requester an opportunity to reduce or limit the scope of the request in order to allow the OIG to process it within the extra 10-day working period or arrange an alternative time period within which the FOIA request will be processed. To aid the requester, the OIG shall make available its FOIA Public Liaison, who shall assist in the resolution of any disputes between the requester and the OIG, and notify the requester of the right of the requester to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services. Unusual circumstances mean that there is a need: ( 1 ) To search for and collect the requested records from field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the office processing the request;
( 2 ) To search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are demanded in a single request (*e.g.* audit work papers); or
( 3 ) For consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another agency having a substantial interest in the determination of the request or among two or more offices of the Office of Inspector General having a substantial interest in the subject matter of the request.
§ 75.21 Targeted Section 3 worker for housing and community development financial assistance. ( a ) *Targeted Section 3 worker.* A Targeted Section 3 worker for housing and community development financial assistance means a Section 3 worker who is: ( 1 ) A worker employed by a Section 3 business concern; or
( 2 ) A worker who currently fits or when hired fit at least one of the following categories, as documented within the past five years: ( i ) Living within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, as defined in § 75.5; or
( ii ) A YouthBuild participant.
( b ) [Reserved]
cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge 

Gholamreza Zandian Jazi 

Reza Zandian 

Watson Rounds 

Elias Abrishami 

Ballard Spahr, LLP 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
#### National Surety Corporation v. Robert R. Kaufman.

Motion granted insofar as to enlarge appellant’s time to procure the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed up to and including August 9, 1960, with notice of argument for the September 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
#### § 570.491 Performance and evaluation report.

The annual performance and evaluation report shall be submitted in accordance with 24 CFR part 91.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117)

[60 FR 1916, Jan. 5, 1995]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Famous Daves
of America, Inc. does hereby certify that:  a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Daves of America,
Inc. for the quarter ended September 26, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Famous Daves of America, Inc. 
 Dated: November 9, 2004
    
    /s/ David GoronkinDavid GoronkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: November 9, 2004
    
    /s/ Diana Garvis PurcelDiana Garvis PurcelVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### §93. Deposit of moneys deposited by unknown parties

Amounts that appear in the accounts of a district land office as "Moneys deposited by unknown parties" shall also be deposited to the credit of the Treasurer of the United States, accompanied by a list showing the amount and, if possible, the date of the receipt of each item; which list shall bear the certificate of the officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior that, after careful investigation, the ownership of said moneys could not be determined, and that they have been reported in the unearned fees and unofficial moneys accounts for five years or more.

(Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2562, §3, 34 Stat. 1245; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section, as originally enacted, related to receivers of public moneys for land districts. The office of receiver was consolidated with that of register by acts Mar. 3, 1925, and Oct. 28, 1921, under which the office of receiver was abolished. See, also, Transfer of Functions note below.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

Words "the accounts of a district land office" substituted for "a register's accounts" and "officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior" substituted for "register" on authority of section 403 of 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 13, 2019

NO. 03-18-00799-CV

Robert Lee Martin, Appellant

v.

Bob Perkins, Ronald Earle, Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza,

Gary Cobb, Diana Medina, and Blake Williams, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on November 15, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is indigent 

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas L. Bratcher, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Queens County, dated November 15, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered August 8, 1956 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree (Penal Law, § 1293-a), and imposing sentence. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
### §328. Expenditures and cultivation requirements

No land shall be patented to any person under sections 321 to 323, 325, and 327 to 329 of this title unless he or his assignors shall have expended in the necessary irrigation, reclamation, and cultivation thereof, by means of main canals and branch ditches, and in permanent improvements upon the land, and in the purchase of water rights for the irrigation of the same, at least $3 per acre of whole tract reclaimed and patented in the manner following: Within one year after making entry for such tract of desert land as aforesaid the party so entering shall expend not less than $1 per acre for the purposes aforesaid; and he shall in like manner expend the sum of $1 per acre during the second and also during the third year thereafter, until the full sum of $3 per acre is so expended. Said party shall file during each year with the officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior proof, by the affidavits of two or more credible witnesses, that the full sum of $1 per acre has been expended in such necessary improvements during such year, and the manner in which expended, and at the expiration of the third year a map or plan showing the character and extent of such improvements. If any party who has made such application shall fail during any year to file the testimony aforesaid the lands shall revert to the United States, and the 25 cents advanced payment shall be forfeited to the United States, and the entry shall be canceled. Nothing herein contained shall prevent a claimant from making his final entry and receiving his patent at an earlier date than hereinbefore prescribed, provided that he then makes the required proof of reclamation to the aggregate extent of $3 per acre: Provided, That proof be further required of the cultivation of one-eighth of the land.

(Mar. 3, 1877, ch. 107, §5, as added Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §2, 26 Stat. 1096; amended 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Section as Unaffected by Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior" substituted for "register" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, which abolished all registers of district land offices and transferred functions of district land offices to Secretary of the Interior. See section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
#### § 891.800 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish rules allowing for, and regulating the participation of, for-profit limited partnerships, of which the sole general partner is a Nonprofit Organization meeting the requirements of 12 U.S.C. 1701q(k)(4) or 42 U.S.C. 8032(k)(6), in the development of housing for the elderly and persons with disabilities using mixed-finance development methods. These rules are intended to develop more supportive housing for the elderly and persons with disabilities by allowing the use of federal assistance, private capital and expertise, and low-income housing tax credits.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3153 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3153

 To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 
                 fish recovery implementation programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

 Mrs. Cubin (for herself, Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico, Mr. Beauprez, Mr. 
Matheson, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Salazar, 
Mr. Cannon, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Ms. DeGette, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Pearce, 
and Mr. Tancredo) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 
                 fish recovery implementation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Upper Colorado and San Juan Basin 
Endangered Fish Recovery Implementation Programs Reauthorization Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN ENDANGERED FISH 
              RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS.

     Section 3 of Public Law 106-392 (114 Stat. 1602) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``$46,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$61,000,000'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2008'' and 
                inserting ``2010'';
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``2008'' and 
                inserting ``2010'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$126,000,000'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1)--
                            (i) by striking $82,000,000'' and inserting 
                        ``$108,000,000''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
                        ``2010''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2008'' and 
                inserting ``2010''; and
            (3) in subsection (c)(4)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ``and the 
                Elkhead Reservoir enlargement'' after ``Wolford 
                Mountain Reservoir''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking 
                ``$20,000,000'' and inserting ``$31,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Solo Cup Company (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 1, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric A. Simonsen, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Eric A. Simonsen           
|Eric A. Simonsen               
|Interim Chief Financial Officer
|                               
|October 16, 2006
§ 42.1 Applicable rules. ( a ) *URA.* HUD-assisted programs and projects are subject to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4601 (URA) (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations issued by the Department of Transportation at 49 CFR part 24.
( b ) *Section 104(d).* In addition to the URA, the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG), and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) programs are also subject to section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5304(d)). The provisions applicable to these programs are set out in subpart C of this part.
( c ) *Additional requirements.* Applicable program regulations may contain additional relocation provisions.
Exhibit 99.2









Report Of Independent

Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors

Structured Obligations Corporation

New York, New York



We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and
            U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held
            by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended December 31, 2019. Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our
            examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
            Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
            circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.



In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described
            above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2019.



This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities
            and Exchange Commission, and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.







March 13, 2020











---
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.155 Investigations.

The procedures for investigations and investigational proceedings are set forth in part 3800 of this chapter.

[61 FR 10442, Mar. 13, 1996]
§ 401.502 Notice requirement when debt restructuring will not occur. ( a ) *PAE responsibility.* If an owner of an eligible project requests a renewal of a section 8 contract without a Restructuring Plan under § 402.4 of this chapter, HUD or the PAE must notify, or ensure that the owner notifies, all parties identified in § 401.501 of the request and of: ( 1 ) The availability (as provided in § 401.500(c)(3)) of the following information: ( i ) The owner evaluation of physical condition (OEPC), or a comprehensive needs assessment (CNA) if used instead of an OEPC, as required by § 401.450 and § 402.6(a)(3) of this chapter;
( ii ) The market analysis required by § 402.6(a)(2) of this chapter, but without addresses (or other specific information indicating location) for comparable properties; and
( iii ) The items identified in § 401.500(b)(1)(i), (ii), and (iv); and
( 2 ) A procedure for submitting public comments regarding this information.
( b ) *Expense and profit/loss information.* The PAE should remove project expense, property valuation, and profit and loss information before disclosing any information obtained by the PAE directly from an owner or project manager, unless the owner has given written consent to disclosure with that information included.
( c ) *Consideration of comments.* The PAE must consider written public comments on the information listed in paragraph (a) of this section, if the comments are submitted within 30 days after giving notice under paragraph (a), and document the consideration for HUD. No public meeting is required.
[65 FR 15485, Mar. 22, 2000, as amended at 65 FR 53900, Sept. 6, 2000]
#### Charles S. Cullen and Lewis Gowen, partners, trading as Cullen & Gowen, appellees, v. Burton S. Jordan, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,099.

Bill for injunction restraining lessee from removing certain property. Temporary injunction issued and motion to dissolve same. Injunction made permanent. Decree reversed by Appellate Court and cause remanded with directions to dismiss bill. Case reinstated with suggestion of damage's by defendant. Damages allowed and bill dismissed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Joe A. Davis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed August 13, 1923.

Richard D. Mills and Hanson & Jacobson, for appellant. Lee O’Neil Browne and Ralph A. Green, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
### SUBCHAPTER V—EMPLOYEE PROTECTION
### §109. Foreign commerce or trade

(a) In General.—In this title, the terms "foreign commerce" and "foreign trade" mean commerce or trade between a place in the United States and a place in a foreign country.

(b) Capital Construction Funds and Construction-Differential Subsidies.—In the context of capital construction funds under chapter 535 of this title, and in the context of construction-differential subsidies under title V of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, the terms "foreign commerce" and "foreign trade" also include, in the case of liquid and dry bulk cargo carrying services, trading between foreign ports in accordance with normal commercial bulk shipping practices in a manner that will permit bulk vessels of the United States to compete freely with foreign bulk vessels in their operation or competition for charters, subject to regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1487.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 109 | 46 App.:1244(a). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title IX, §905(a), 49 Stat. 2016; June 23, 1938, ch. 600, §39(a), 52 Stat. 964; Pub. L. 91–469, §28, Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1034; Pub. L. 92–402, §2, Aug. 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 617; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(133)(A), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 165. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "its Territories or possessions, or the District of Columbia" are omitted because of the definition of "United States" in this chapter.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Merchant Marine Act, 1936, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 29, 1936, ch. 858, 49 Stat. 1985. Title V of the Act enacted provisions set out as notes under section 53101 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1936 Amendment note set out under section 101 of this title and Tables.
#### § 242.8 Standards for licensure and methods of operation.

The Secretary shall require satisfactory evidence that the hospital will be located in a state or political subdivision of a state with reasonable minimum standards of licensure and methods of operation for hospitals, and satisfactory assurance that such standards will be applied and enforced with respect to the hospital.