alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.3


 


Third
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
third AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”),
is entered into as of August 30, 2022 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Adam Kaplin, M.D. (“Employee”)
and MyMD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purpose of amending that certain Employment Agreement,
dated as of December 18, 2020, and as amended on February 10, 2021 and November 24, 2021, by and between Employee and the Company (the
“Agreement”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS,
Section 17 of the Agreement provides that no waiver or modification of any provision of the Agreement will be enforceable unless it is
agreed to in writing by the party against which enforcement would be sought; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties mutually desire to modify certain provisions that would otherwise apply to Bonus Compensation potentially payable to Employee
pursuant to the Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 17 of the Agreement, in consideration of the mutual provisions, conditions, and covenants contained
herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


In
Exhibit B to the Agreement, Bonus Compensation, paragraph 5 is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“5)
Bonus Compensation of $100,000 cash to be paid in lump-sum cash upon the completion of the following Bonus Event: the establishment of
a formal relationship with the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute to advance, participation in and/or support of the use of MYMD-1 in ocular
disease preclinical or clinical applications provided that the nature and/or extent of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute relationship is
satisfactory in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.”


 


[Remainder
of the Page Intentionally Left Blank;


Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the Effective Date.





 


	 	EMPLOYEE:
    
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Adam Kaplin, M.D.
	 	Adam Kaplin, M.D.
	 	 	 
	 	THE
    COMPANY: 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Chris Chapman, M.D.
	 	Name:	Chris
    Chapman, M.D.
	 	Title:	President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harold Davidson, Appellant.

Permission to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. Appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief.
§ 882.407 Other Federal requirements. ( a ) The moderate rehabilitation program is subject to applicable Federal requirements in 24 CFR 5.105 and to the requirements for protection for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking in 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking).
( b ) In order to facilitate emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, covered housing providers have discretion to adopt and modify any existing admission preferences or transfer waitlist priorities for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.
( c ) Covered housing providers must develop and implement an emergency transfer plan that meets the requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e), and when a safe unit is not immediately available for a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking who qualifies for an emergency transfer, covered housing providers must, at a minimum: ( 1 ) Review the covered housing provider's existing inventory of units and determine when the next vacant unit may be available; and
( 2 ) Provide a listing of nearby HUD subsidized rental properties, with or without preference for persons of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and contact information for the local HUD field office.
( d ) Each year, the covered housing provider must submit to HUD data on all emergency transfers requested under 24 CFR 5.2005(e), pertaining to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, including data on the outcomes of such requests.
[81 FR 80812, Nov. 16, 2016]
### §365. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts June 25, 1938, ch. 680, §15, 52 Stat. 1113; June 20, 1939, ch. 227, §19, 53 Stat. 844, related to transitional provisions occurring before July 1, 1939.
### §30302. Cause of action

When the death of an individual is caused by wrongful act, neglect, or default occurring on the high seas beyond 3 nautical miles from the shore of the United States, the personal representative of the decedent may bring a civil action in admiralty against the person or vessel responsible. The action shall be for the exclusive benefit of the decedent's spouse, parent, child, or dependent relative.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1511.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30302 | 46 App.:761(a). | Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, §1(a), 41 Stat. 537; Pub. L. 106–181, title IV, §404(a)(1), Apr. 5, 2000, 114 Stat. 131. |

Section

The words "Subject to subsection (b) of this section" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "3 nautical miles" are substituted for "a marine league" for clarity. The words "United States" are substituted for "any State, or the District of Columbia, or the Territories or dependencies of the United States" because of the definition of "United States" in chapter 1 of the revised title. The words "bring a civil action" are substituted for "maintain a suit" for consistency with rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.). The words "for damages" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "in the district courts of the United States" are omitted as unnecessary because of 28 U.S.C. 1333. The words "person or vessel" are substituted for "vessel, person, or corporation" because of 1 U.S.C. 1. The word "responsible" is substituted for "which would have been liable if death had not ensued" to eliminate unnecessary words.
§ 232.252 Definitions. All of the definitions contained in § 232.1 shall apply to this subpart. In addition, as used in this part, the following term shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Contract of insurance* means the agreement evidenced by the Commissioner's insurance endorsement and includes the provisions of this subpart and of the Act.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Polypore, Inc.    Chief Financial Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Lynn Amos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/LYNN AMOSLynn Amos
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------

Date:
March 14, 2007

---



QuickLinks
§ 578.91 Termination of assistance to program participants. ( a ) *Termination of assistance.* The recipient or subrecipient may terminate assistance to a program participant who violates program requirements or conditions of occupancy. Termination under this section does not bar the recipient or subrecipient from providing further assistance at a later date to the same individual or family.
( b ) *Due process.* In terminating assistance to a program participant, the recipient or subrecipient must provide a formal process that recognizes the rights of individuals receiving assistance under the due process of law. This process, at a minimum, must consist of: ( 1 ) Providing the program participant with a written copy of the program rules and the termination process before the participant begins to receive assistance;
( 2 ) Written notice to the program participant containing a clear statement of the reasons for termination;
( 3 ) A review of the decision, in which the program participant is given the opportunity to present written or oral objections before a person other than the person (or a subordinate of that person) who made or approved the termination decision; and
( 4 ) Prompt written notice of the final decision to the program participant.
( c ) *Hard-to-house populations.* Recipients and subrecipients that are providing permanent supportive housing for hard-to-house populations of homeless persons must exercise judgment and examine all extenuating circumstances in determining when violations are serious enough to warrant termination so that a program participant's assistance is terminated only in the most severe cases.
### §451g. Preferences; veterans; timely applicants

Where there are two or more timely applicants for a farm unit on a particular project or division thereof under the provisions of this subchapter, one or more of whom is an ex-serviceman who would be entitled under the applicable statutes to a preference in making entry of farm units on such project or division, the ex-serviceman, or one of them, shall have a preference in making such exchange. Any timely applicant for an exchange under the provisions of this subchapter shall be entitled to preference over any other applicant for a farm unit on the same project or division thereof.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §8, 67 Stat. 568.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 323 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 323

To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis 
Island Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, 
                 as the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

 Mr. Engel (for himself, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Wolf, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. 
McNulty, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Watson, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Serrano, 
Mr. Meeks of New York, Mrs. Lowey, Mr. Berman, Mr. Lewis of California, 
 and Mr. Weiner) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis 
Island Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, 
                 as the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Ellis Island Library on the third floor of the Ellis Island 
Immigration Museum, located on Ellis Island in New York Harbor, shall 
be known and redesignated as the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Ellis Island Library on the third 
floor of the Ellis Island Immigration Museum referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bob Hope Memorial Library''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.4
	​


	​


	​



	​
	    
	July 26, 2022

	Clean Earth Acquisitions Corp.
	​
	​

	12600 Hill Country Blvd, Building R, Suite 275
	​
	​

	Bee Cave, Texas 78738
	​
	​



​
Re: Clean Earth Acquisitions Corp.-- Reduction of Deferred Discount
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter references the underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”), dated February 23, 2022, between Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“Citigroup”), as representative of the underwriters named on Schedule I of the Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriters”), and Clean Earth Acquisitions Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), providing for the issuance and sale to the several Underwriters of an aggregate of 20,000,000 units of the Company, in addition to 3,000,000 units of the Company on exercised of the over-allotment option. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Underwriting Agreement.
Solely in the event the Company consummates an Initial Business Combination with [Intentionally Redacted]1 (the “Target”), Citigroup agrees to forfeit (and irrevocably waives any right to) 50% of its share of the Deferred Discount (or $3,622,5002) that is to be paid to the Underwriters upon the consummation of such Initial Business Combination and paid out of the proceeds of the Offering held in the Trust Account in accordance with Sections 2(c) and 5(bb) of the Underwriting Agreement. The amount waived and forfeited by Citigroup may, in the discretion of the Company, be allocated to the other Underwriter or, to the extent not allocated, reduce the Deferred Discount.  Upon the earlier of (i) the execution of a binding definitive agreement with the Target in connection with an Initial Business Combination and (ii) the election by the Company not to proceed with an Initial Business Combination with the Target, the Company will promptly inform Citigroup of the name of the Target. Except as modified by this paragraph, the Underwriting Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. 
	​


	​



	​
	



​
	
	​



​


	1
	The name of the Target has been intentionally redacted for confidentiality.  The Target is a European company in the clean energy space with EBITDA of approximately $10-15 million.


	2
	Represents 50% of the Deferred Discount of $8,050,000 (including the over-allotment option) multiplied by Citigroup’s 90% share of the Deferred Discount.
FONTANELLA AND BABITTS
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS                       534 Union Boulevard
                                                   Totowa Boro, New Jersey 07512
                                                   Tel: (973) 595-5300
                                                   Fax: (973) 595-5890




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8 (File Nos.  333-132059  and  333-119839)  of our report,
dated December 15, 2006, on the  consolidated  financial  statements of Roebling
Financial  Corp,  Inc.  (the  "Registrant")  at and for the  fiscal  year  ended
September  30,  2006  which  report  is   incorporated  by  reference  into  the
Registrant's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  September
30, 2006.


                                                      /s/ Fontanella and Babitts

December 22, 2006
§ 81.43 Reports; underwriting and appraisal guideline review. ( a ) *Reports.* Each GSE, in the AHAR required under § 81.63, shall assess underwriting standards, business practices, repurchase requirements, pricing, fees, and procedures that affect the purchase of mortgages for low- and moderate-income families, or that may yield disparate results based on the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, age, or national origin of the borrower, including revisions thereto to promote affordable housing or fair lending.
( b ) *Review of Underwriting and Appraisal Guidelines.* The Secretary shall periodically review and comment on the underwriting and appraisal guidelines of each enterprise to ensure that such guidelines are consistent with the Fair Housing Act and 12 U.S.C. 4545.
### §30501. Definitions

In this chapter:

(1) Covered small passenger vessel.—The term "covered small passenger vessel"—

(A) means a small passenger vessel, as defined in section 2101, that is—

(i) not a wing-in-ground craft; and

(ii) carrying—

(I) not more than 49 passengers on an overnight domestic voyage; and

(II) not more than 150 passengers on any voyage that is not an overnight domestic voyage; and

(B) includes any wooden vessel constructed prior to March 11, 1996, carrying at least 1 passenger for hire.

(2) Owner.—The term "owner" includes a charterer that mans, supplies, and navigates a vessel at the charterer's own expense or by the charterer's own procurement.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1512; Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11503(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4130.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30501 | 46 App.:186. | R.S. §4286. |

Section

The words "In this chapter" are substituted for "within the meaning of the provisions of title 48 of the Revised Statutes relating to the limitation of the liability of the owners of vessels" because of the codification of title 46, United States Code. The word "supplies" is substituted for "victual" for clarity. The words "and such vessel, when so chartered, shall be liable in the same manner as if navigated by the owner thereof" are omitted as unnecessary.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "In this chapter, the term 'owner' includes a charterer that mans, supplies, and navigates a vessel at the charterer's own expense or by the charterer's own procurement."
#### The People of the State of New York *ex*rel. Frederick L. Smith, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Appeal from an order denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The relator sought to be resentenced as a first offender contending that at the time of his sentence in 1934 the court failed to comply with section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in not asking him if there was any legal cause why sentence should not be pronounced against him. There is submitted a certified copy of the statement taken prior to sentencing on January 12, 1934 in the Kings County Court which after setting forth various answers to questions contained therein, there is the following: “Being asked and he having nothing to say why the judgment of the law should not be pronounced against him, the Court pronounced Judgment as follows”. It further appears that at the time of sentencing the defendant was represented by counsel. The stenographic minutes of the 1934 proceedings are not before this court. As we have stated on numerous occasions the failure of compliance does not vitiate the judgment of conviction but entitled the prisoner to resentencing after compliance. The record further disclosed that a prior application for a writ of habeas corpus on the same grounds (Code Crim. Pro., § 480) had been granted, a hearing held at which the prisoner was present, after which the writ was dismissed. Order unanimously affirmed.
1

Walters, Julie

From: Walters, Julie

Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:32 AM

To: 'Travis Ritchie'

Subject: RE: Request for technical meeting re Pio Pico

Hi Travis, 

Thanks for your message below. I am just back in the office today after having been out for 10 days so am catching up 

on a number of projects. I’ll discuss your request with my colleagues and one of us will get back to you. 

Regards, 

Julie 

******************************************* 

Julie Walters 

Assistant Regional Counsel

USEPA, Region 9 

75 Hawthorne St., Mail Code ORC-2 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Email: walters.julie@epa.gov

Direct Dial: 415-972-3892 

Fax: 415-947-3570 

******************************************** 

From: Travis Ritchie [mailto:travis.ritchie@sierraclub.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:58 AM 

To: Walters, Julie 

Subject: Request for technical meeting re Pio Pico 

Hi Julie, 

I am one of the attorneys with Sierra Club who was on the Pio Pico appeal. I am writing to request a meeting to 

discuss technical issues related to the PM BACT analysis at Pio Pico. Bill Powers, a technical expert that Sierra 

Club works with frequently, recently presented testimony at a TCEQ hearing in Texas on the PM BACT 

analysis for another plant (El Paso Electric's Montana Plant) using the same LMS100 turbines permitted for Pio 

Pico. Bill did a lot of work looking at the cooling tower systems, and he would like to discuss the benefits of an 

air cooled system rather than a wet tower or a hybrid wet-dry system that Pio Pico is proposing. 

My hope is that this is an issue that we can address with Region 9 while the Pio Pico permit is on remand to 

take a second look at PM BACT issues. It is applicable to the Pio Pico plant and may also be an important issue 

going forward with other similar CTs or even CCGTs. Apparently the air cooled systems are a dramatic 

improvement for PM emissions. For example, New Jersey DEP has a draft permit out for comment (Sewaren 

Plant) that proposes an air cooled system for a CCGT based on the strong improvement in PM emissions. 

I wanted to reach out to you first because you are the attorney of record for the appeal. However, the request is 

not directly related to the appeal proceeding and I would be happy to follow up with someone else if you think 

it is more appropriate. 

--
2

Travis Ritchie 

Associate Attorney 

Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 

85 Second Street, 2nd Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

415-977-5727 

travis.ritchie@sierraclub.org