alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§615aaa to 615iii. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 615aaa, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 964; Pub. L. 96–375, §6(a), Oct. 3, 1975, 94 Stat. 1507; Pub. L. 98–570, §1(1), (2), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2941; Pub. L. 100–516, §22(1), (2), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2575, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of the Closed Basin division, San Luis Valley project, Colorado, established Russell Lakes Waterfowl Management Area, and provided a water supply for Blanca Wildlife Habitat Area and Alamosa National Wildlife Refuge.

Section 615bbb, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §102, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 964; Pub. L. 96–375, §6(b), Oct. 3, 1975, 94 Stat. 1507; Pub. L. 100–516, §22(3), (4), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2575, related to a control system to identify fluctuations in the water table.

Section 615ccc, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §103, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 965, established an operating committee.

Section 615ddd, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §104, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 965; Pub. L. 98–570, §1(3), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2941; Pub. L. 100–516, §22(5), (6), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2575, 2576, related to costs and priority of water availability.

Section 615eee, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §105, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 965; Pub. L. 98–570, §1(4), (5), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2942, related to easements and rights-of-way.

Section 615fff, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §106, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 966, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife resources and the enhancement of recreational opportunities in connection with this project.

Section 615ggg, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §107, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 966, provided for transfer of responsibility for care, operation and maintenance of project works to State of Colorado, or political subdivision thereof, or to a water users' organization.

Section 615hhh, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §108, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 966, provided that nothing in Pub. L. 92–514, enacted sections 615aaa to 615jjjj of this title, be deemed to amend, modify, or conflict with any existing provisions.

Section 615iii, Pub. L. 92–514, title I, §109, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 966; Pub. L. 96–375, §6(c), Oct. 3, 1975, 94 Stat. 1507; Pub. L. 100–516, §22(7), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2576, authorized appropriations for this project.
### §886. Survey of lands within limits of railroad grants

For the survey of the public lands lying within the limits of land grants made by Congress to aid in the construction of railroads, and the selection therein of such lands as are granted therefor, to enable the Secretary of the Interior to carry out the provisions of section 894 of this title, the sum of $100,000 heretofore appropriated is made a continuing appropriation for the survey of lands within the limits of railroad land grants, and any money which shall be expended of such appropriation and reimbursed and paid into the Treasury is reappropriated, and said sum shall remain a continuing appropriation, and so often as any part of the same shall, after being expended, be reimbursed by any railroad company as hereinafter provided, the same shall be again available for the purposes aforesaid: Provided, That any portion of said sum expended for surveying such lands shall be reimbursed by the respective companies or parties in interest for whose benefit the lands are granted, according to the provisions of section 881 of this title: And provided further, That whenever there shall have been reimbursed and paid into the Treasury of the United States, by the respective companies or parties in interest, any part of said appropriation expended for surveys within such grants, there shall be immediately available, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, an amount equal to the amount so reimbursed, and the same shall be available for the survey of the public lands lying within the limits of the railroad land grants made by Congress, until all of said lands shall have been surveyed: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the use, within the limits of any railroad land grant made by Congress, of any part of any regular appropriation for surveying the public lands: Provided, That no part of the foregoing money shall be used for any land embraced in any grant to the State of Florida: And provided further, That the provisions of law requiring reimbursements to be made to the United States by railroad corporations claiming such grants shall apply equally to the successors of such railroad corporations acquiring title to their lands and other property, under decree of foreclosure of any mortgage authorized by Congress.

(Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 189, §1, 28 Stat. 937; Pub. L. 96–470, title I, §108(b), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2239.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–470 struck out provision requiring Secretary of the Interior to report to each regular session of Congress what has been done under this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Appropriations

Effective July 1, 1935, the continuing appropriation provided for in this section was repealed by act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §1, 48 Stat. 1225.
§ 248.103 General prepayment limitation. ( a ) *Prepayment.* An owner of eligible low income housing may prepay, and a mortgagee may accept prepayment of, a mortgage on such project only in accordance with a plan of action approved by the Commissioner.
( b ) *Termination.* A mortgage insurance contract with respect to eligible low income housing may be terminated pursuant to § 207.253 of this chapter only in accordance with a plan of action approved by the Commissioner.
( c ) *Foreclosure.* A mortgagee of a mortgage insured by the Commissioner may foreclose the mortgage on, or acquire by deed in lieu of foreclosure, any eligible low income housing only if the mortgagee also conveys title to the project to the Commissioner in connection with a claim for insurance benefits.
( d ) *Effect of unauthorized prepayment.* A mortgagee's acceptance of a prepayment in violation of paragraph (a) of this section, or the voluntary termination of a mortgage insurance contract in violation of paragraph (b) of this section, shall be null and void and any low income affordability restrictions on the project shall continue to apply to the project.
( e ) *Remedies for unauthorized prepayment.* A mortgagee's acceptance of a prepayment in violation of paragraph (a) of this section, or attempt to obtain voluntary termination of a mortgage insurance contract in violation of paragraph (b) of this section, is grounds for administrative action under parts 24 and 25 of this title, in addition to any other remedies available by law, including rescission of the prepayment or reinstatement of the insurance contract.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard V. Secord, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc. ("CTI");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

 May 20, 2005

/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Acting Financial Officer
October 2, 2015

Mr. Glen Kitto

8723 Bacardi Drive

Dallas, TX 75238

Dear Mr. Kitto :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your July 13, 2015, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2901 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional in formation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63( d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3110 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3110

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide for treatment of 
distinct population segments of the Eastern oyster as separate species.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2005

  Mr. Jindal introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide for treatment of 
distinct population segments of the Eastern oyster as separate species.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF DISTINCT POPULATION SEGMENTS OF EASTERN OYSTER 
              AS SEPARATE SPECIES.

    Section 3(16) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1532(16)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and any'' and inserting ``, any''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        any distinct population segment of the Eastern oyster 
        (Crassostrea virginica) which interbreeds when mature''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gilbert C. Ferson, appellant, v. Aaron Rosenbaum, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,357.

Claim for rent and moneys due under lease. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. J. H. Ragsdale, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

Mather *&*Hutson, for appellant; Lawrence C. Traeger, of counsel. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Louis Kalish, appellee, v. Continental Auto Insurance Association, appellant.

Assumpsit on insurance policy to recover for theft of automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Silas Cook, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Kramer, Kramer & Campbell and R. E. Costello, for appellant. L. V. Walcott and H. G. Baker, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
**Exhibit 13**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:**

 

**The annual report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 20-F.**

 

 
|                       | /s/ Gerardo de Nicolás Gutiérrez |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Dated:   May 17, 2013 | Gerardo   de Nicolás Gutiérrez   |
|                       | Chief   Executive Officer                  |
|                       |                                       |
|                       | /s/   Carlos Moctezuma Velasco             |
| Dated:   May 17, 2013 | Carlos Moctezuma Velasco                   |
|                       | Chief   Financial Officer                  |

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
122°00" |

7 48'00'

124°00°

48°00' [~

4: &£F0, 00d

<

3

| uk . arog LL Ao, _ a ‘ 7 ala
3

124°00'

NATIONAL OCEAN SURVEY

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL IO METERS +
WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 5 METER CONTOURS
DATUM 1S MEAN LOWER LOW WATER SEATILE, WA. ; /
: SEATTLE
: WVL/SOZ

= SuBsLor TU ACV /REVISION
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:59:06-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 241.605 Contract requirements. ( a ) When the principal amount of the loan is $100,000 or less, the form of contract between the borrower and the contractor shall be in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) The contract between the borrower and the general contractor may be in the form of either a lump sum contract or a cost plus contract. Either form of contract shall include the cost of the energy conserving improvements, their installation, and such other work to be performed by the contractor as necessary to meet the requirements of the Secretary. A lump sum contract shall provide for the payment of a specified amount. A cost plus contract shall provide for the payment of the contractor's actual cost of compliance with the requirements of the contract, plus such allowances for overhead and profit as may be approved by the Commissioner and shall provide that the total cost under the contract shall not exceed the upset price as approved by the Commissioner.
( 2 ) If agreed to by the general contractor and borrower, a lump sum form of contract between the borrower and the general contractor may be used unless the Commissioner determines that a cost plus contract with a maximum upset price is necessary to protect the interest of the borrower or the Commissioner.
( b ) When the principal amount of the loan is over $100,000, the form of contract between the borrower and the contractor shall be in accordance with the following: ( 1 ) *Lump sum contract.* If the Commissioner determines that there is no identity of interest between the borrower or any of the officers, directors or stockholders of the borrower and the contractor, there may be used a lump sum contract providing for payment of the specified amount.
( 2 ) *Cost plus fixed fee contract.* ( i ) If the Commissioner determines that there is any identity of interest (financial or otherwise) between the borrower, its officers, directors or stockholders and the contractor, the form of contract shall provide for payment of the actual cost of construction not to exceed an upset price and may provide for payment of a fixed fee not exceeding a reasonable allowance as established by the Commissioner in accordance with customary practices in the area.
( ii ) In any case where the borrower is a nonprofit entity, a cost plus fixed fee contract shall be used unless it is established to the Commissioner's satisfaction that such form of contract is not required to protect his/her interests and the interests of the borrower, in which case, a lump sum form of contract may be used.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
[No. 7237.

Decided June 1, 1908.]

#### Curtis Fisk, *Respondent,*v. Tacoma Smelting Company, *Appellant.**1*

Dismissal and Nonsuit — Voluntary. Under Bal. Code, § 5085, the plaintiff is entitled to voluntary nonsuit at any time, before the jury retires, if there is no set-off or counterclaim interposed.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Reid, J., entered September 25, 1907, granting plaintiff’s motion for nonsuit, in an action for personal injuries.

Affirmed.

*Hudson & Holt,*for appellant.

*Frank S. Carroll,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 95 Pac. 1082.

Per Curiam.

This is an action for damages for alleged personal injuries. At the conclusion of respondent’s testimony, appellant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and moved the court for a judgment. The motion was denied. *515The respondent asked the court to continue the case so that he might be enabled to procure a witness whose testimony he regarded as essential. The court refused to continue the case; whereupon the respondent asked the court for a voluntary nonsuit, which the court granted. From the ruling of the court in granting the nonsuit, this appeal is taken.

Paragraph 1, § 727, chapter 23, Pierce’s Code (Bal. Code, § 5085), the chapter in relation to judgment of nonsuit, is as follows:

> “An action may be dismissed, or a judgment of nonsuit entered in the following cases: 1. By the plaintiff himself at any time, either in term time or in vacation, before the jury retire to consider their verdict, unless set-off be interposed as a defense, or unless the defendant sets up a counter claim to the specific property or thing which is the subject-matter of the action.”

It will be seen at a glance that the terms of the statute are so certain and definite as to preclude construction. The motion in this case was made before the jury retired, and there was no set-off interposed or counterclaim set up. The court acted by express authority of the statute, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
### Irrigated Acreage Within the Basin and Range Carbonate-Rock Aquifer System, White Pine County, Nevada, and Adjacent Areas in Nevada and Utah

By: Toby L. Welborn**Michael T. Moreo**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds273

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Metadata:                               - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata**
  - **Metadata** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
### ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1021 NORTH GRAND AVENUE EAST, P.O. Box19276,SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794·9276 • (217) 782-2829 PAT QUINN, GOVERNOR LISA BONNETT, DIRECTOR

217/785-4140 January 9, 2015


### Mr. George T. Czerniak, Division Director Air and Radiation Division (A-18J) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RegionV 77 West Jackson Boulevard Chicago, IL 60604

DearMr. Czerniak, This letter is clarifying ourDecember 31, 2012, Infrastructure SIP submission for the 2008 ozone and 2010 

### NOz and S02NAAQS. The authority for the Illinois EPA and Illinois Pollution Control Boardto develop rules and regulations found in 415 ILCS 5/4 also allows Illinois EPA to implement current rules and apply existing controls and emissions limits to help maintain new standards. Existing controls and emission limits that canbe applied to the 2008 ozone NAAQS are found in 35 Ill. Adm. CodeParts 205, 215, 218, 219, and 223, which control VOC as an ozone precursor, as well as Parts 217 and 225, which controlNOx as an ozoneprecursor. The controls and emission limits for NOx also help protect the 2010 N02NAAQS. 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 214 and 225 contain the controls and emissions limits that canbe applied to the 2010 S02 NAAQS. Our authorityunder the Illinois Enviromnental Protection Act to create new rules and implement existing emission limits and controls allow us to meet the requirements on 110(a)(2)(A). Please feel free to contact David Bloomberg at 217/524-4949 ifyou have questions orneed additional informationpertainingto this matter. Sincerely,

Ju e K.

# Armi~%~

ureau ofAir

4302 N. Main St., Rockford, !l 61103 (815)**987~7760** 595 S.State, Elgin, IL 60123 (847) 608-3131 2125 S. FirstSt., Champaign, IL 61820 (217) 278-5800 2009 Mall St., Collinsville, ll 62234 (618) 346-5120 9511 Harrison St., Des Plaines, IL 60016 (847) 294-4000 412 SW WashingtonSt.,Suite 0, Peoria, ll 61602 (309) 671-3022 2309 W. Main St.,Suite 116,Marlon, ll62959 (618) 993-7200 100W. Randolph, Suite 10-300,Chicago, ll 60601 (312) 81..:1-6026 PLEASE PRINT ON RECYCLED PAPER