John R. Kaslch, Governor 

Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor 

Scott J. Nally, Director 

DEC 12 20t2· 

Susan Hedman 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region 5 

77 West Jackson Blvd. R-19J 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 

Re: Request for Review and Approval of the Revised Columbus Area Maintenance Plan 

Approval for the 1997 Eight-Hour Ozone Standard 

Dear Administrator Hedman: 

I am writing to formally request review and approval of a revision to the maintenance plan for 

the Columbus area (Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties) with 

respect to the 1997 eight-hour ozone standard. Ohio EPA submitted a redesignation request 

and maintenance plan for this area on. U.S. EPA approved this requests on September 15, 

2009 (74FR 47404). 

Ohio EPA is now requesting a revision to the maintenance plan to update mobile emission 

projections and conformity budgets based on emission rates generated from U.S. EPA's 

latest mobile emissions model, the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulation (MOVES) 2010. In 

December 2009, MOVES replaced MOBILE6.2 as the U.S. EPA's official emission factor 

model. The area is still attaining and maintaining the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and the 

point, area and non-road emissions have not changed significantly and did not need to be 

updated for this submittal. 

The enclosed information was compiled by Ohio EPA, Ohio Department of 

Transportation, and Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission. The public hearing for 

this package was held on December 4, 2012 in Columbus, Ohio. Testimony was 

provided in support of the revised request during the public hearing. A copy of this 

testimony is provided in appendix E. 

This submittal consists of one (1) hard copy of the required documentation. An exact duplicate 

electronic version of the submittal in PDF format is available at ·' -:~.· ~··· 

'r ~. 

50 West Town Street • Suite 700 • P.O. Box 1049 • Columbus, OH 43216-1049 

www.epa.ohio.gov • (614) 644-3020 • (614) 644-3184 (fax) 
http://epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/1997.aspx under the heading "Redesignations and Maintenance 

Plans". 

If you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Dines in the Division of Air Pollution 

Control at (614) 644-3696. 

Sincerely, 

tc::J~ Director 

enclosures 

cc: Bob Hodanbosi, DAPC 

Jennifer Dines, DAPC 
 

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND 

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR 

THE COLUMBUS, OH 

OZONE 

NONATTAINMENT AREA 

Prepared by: 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

March 2009 

Revised December 2012
 

This page left intentionally blank
 i 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Chapter One 

Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 

Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 

Geographical description .............................................................................................................. 2 

Status of air quality ....................................................................................................................... 2 

Chapter Two 

Requirements for redesignation .................................................................................................... 3 

Chapter Three 

Ozone monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 6 

Ozone NAAQS .............................................................................................................................. 6 

Ambient data quality assured ........................................................................................................ 7 

Three complete years of data ....................................................................................................... 8 

Commitment to continue monitoring ........................................................................................... 10 

Chapter Four 

Emission inventory ...................................................................................................................... 11 

Base year inventory .................................................................................................................... 11 

Emission projections ................................................................................................................... 11 

Demonstration of maintenance ................................................................................................... 17 

Permanent and enforceable emissions reductions ..................................................................... 25 

Provisions for future updates ...................................................................................................... 25 

Chapter Five 

Control measures and regulations .............................................................................................. 26 

Marginal Nonattainment areas to implement RACT ................................................................... 26 

Emission inventories/statements ................................................................................................ 26 

Implementation of past SIP revisions .......................................................................................... 26 

New source review provisions ................................................................................................... 29 

Assurance of continued controls ................................................................................................. 29 

Chapter Six 

Contingency measures ............................................................................................................... 30 

Commitment to revise plan ......................................................................................................... 30 

Commitment for contingency measures ..................................................................................... 30 

Potential contingency measures ................................................................................................. 31 

List of VOC and NOx sources...................................................................................................... 33 

Chapter Seven 

Public participation ...................................................................................................................... 34 

Chapter Eight 

Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 35 
 ii 

FIGURES 

Figure 1 Columbus Basic Nonattainment Area.................................................................... 7 

TABLES 

Table 1 Monitoring Data for Columbus 2006 – 2008 .......................................................... 9 

Table 2 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Delaware Co. ................. 15 

Table 3 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Fairfield Co. .................... 15 

Table 4 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Franklin Co. .................... 15 

Table 5 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Knox Co. ........................ 15 

Table 6 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Licking Co. ..................... 16 

Table 7 Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources for Madison Co. ................... 16 

Table 8 Emission Estimations for On-road Total Columbus Sources ............................... 16 

Table 9 Mobile Vehicle Emission Budget ......................................................................... 16 

Table 10 VOC Emission Inventory Delaware Co. ............................................................... 18 

Table 11 VOC Emission Inventory Fairfield Co. ................................................................. 19 

Table 12 VOC Emission Inventory Franklin Co. ................................................................. 19 

Table 13 VOC Emission Inventory Knox Co. ...................................................................... 19 

Table 14 VOC Emission Inventory Licking Co. ................................................................... 20 

Table 15 VOC Emission Inventory Madison Co. ................................................................ 20 

Table 16 VOC Emission Inventory Columbus, Total .......................................................... 21 

Table 17 NOx Emission Inventory Delaware Co. ................................................................ 21 

Table 18 NOx Emission Inventory Fairfield Co. .................................................................. 21 

Table 19 NOx Emission Inventory Franklin Co. .................................................................. 22 

Table 20 NOx Emission Inventory Knox Co. ....................................................................... 22 

Table 21 NOx Emission Inventory Licking Co. .................................................................... 23 

Table 22 NOx Emission Inventory Madison Co. ................................................................. 23 

Table 23 NOx Emission Inventory Columbus Totals ........................................................... 23 

Table 24 Projected Emission Estimates 2006-2018 Columbus.......................................... 24 

Table 25 Combined Comparison of 2002 and 2006 On-road and EGU Totals .................. 25 

 

APPENDICES 

A Air Quality System (AQS) Data 

B Ohio 2002 SIP Base Year Inventory Discussion 

C Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emissions Estimates 

D LADCO Technical Support Document 

E Public Participation Documentation 
 iii 

This page left intentionally blank 
 1 

REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND 

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE COLUMBUS, OHIO OZONE 

NONATTAINMENT AREA 

CHAPTER ONE 

Introduction 

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires areas failing to meet the National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) for ozone to develop State Implementation Plans (SIP’s) to 

expeditiously attain and maintain the standard. In 1997, the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) revised the air quality standard for ozone replacing the 1979 

one-hour standard with an eight-hour ozone standard set at 0.08 parts per million (ppm). 

The standard was challenged legally and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in February of 

2001. 

On April 30, 2004, U.S. EPA designated 134 nonattainment areas for the eight-hour ozone 

standard. Since that time, U.S. EPA has reclassified nine of the 134 original nonattainment 

areas to the next lower classification. Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA allows states to 

request nonattainment areas to be redesignated to attainment provided certain criteria are 

met. The following are the criteria that must be met in order for an area to be redesignated 

from nonattainment to attainment: 

i) A determination that the area has attained the eight-hour ozone standard.

ii) An approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the area under Section 

110(k).

iii) A determination that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent 

and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from implementation of 

the SIP and other federal requirements.

iv) A fully approved maintenance plan under Section 175(A).

v) A determination that all Section 110 and Part D requirements have been 

met. 

 

Background 

The Columbus nonattainment area includes the following Counties: Delaware, Fairfield, 

Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison. As part of the 1990 CAA Amendments re-evaluation, 

the Counties within the Columbus area were designated as follows for the one-hour ozone 

standard pursuant to the CAA: Delaware, Franklin and Licking were designated as 

marginal nonattainment and therefore were subject to nonattainment area rulemakings. 

Fairfield, Knox and Madison were designated as unclassifiable/attainment and therefore 

were not subject to nonattainment area rulemakings. The Columbus area was 

redesignated to attainment with respect to the one-hour ozone standard on February 1, 

1996 (61FR3591). A maintenance plan was approved at that time. The mobile budget for 

this maintenance plan was adjusted on July 10, 1998 (63FR37255) to take credit for 

additional federal programs for area sources and transfer the resulting increased safety 

margin to the mobile sources budget. 
 2 

As a result of the 2004 ozone designations, U.S. EPA designated the Columbus area basic 

nonattainment for the eight-hour standard and Ohio EPA was required to develop a plan to 

reduce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions and to 

demonstrate that the area will meet the federal eight-hour air quality standard for ozone by 

June 2009. 

This document is intended to support Ohio’s request that the Columbus area be 

redesignated from nonattainment to attainment for the eight-hour ozone standard. The 

Columbus area has recorded three (3) years of complete quality-assured ambient air 

quality monitoring data for the years 2006 – 2008 demonstrating attainment of the eighthour ozone standard. 

 Geographical Description

 The Columbus eight-hour ozone nonattainment area is located in central Ohio and includes 

the Counties of Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking and Madison. This area is 

shown is shown in Figure 1 under Chapter Three. 

 Status of Air Quality 

Ozone monitoring data for the most recent three (3) years, 2006 through 2008, 

demonstrate that the air quality has met the NAAQS for ozone in this basic nonattainment 

area. The NAAQS attainment, accompanied by decreases in emission levels discussed in 

Chapter Four, supports a redesignation to attainment for the Columbus area based on the 

requirements in Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. 
 3 

CHAPTER TWO 

Requirements for Redesignation 

U.S. EPA has published detailed guidance in a document entitled Procedures for 

Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment (redesignation guidance), issued 

September 4, 1992, to Regional Air Directors. The redesignation request and maintenance 

plan are based on the redesignation guidance, supplemented with additional guidance 

received from staff of U.S. EPA Region V. 

Below is a summary of each redesignation criterion as it applies to the Columbus area. 

i.) Attainment of the standard 

 There are two components involved in making this demonstration. The first 

component relies on ambient air quality data. The data that are used to 

demonstrate attainment should be the product of ambient monitoring that is 

representative of the area of highest concentration. The data should be 

collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR 58 and recorded in 

the Air Quality System (AQS) in order for it to be available to the public for 

review. 

 The second component relies upon supplemental U.S. EPA-approved air 

quality modeling. The supplemental modeling is not required for ozone 

nonattainment areas seeking redesignation; however, in Appendix C and 

Appendix D the most recent modeling results showing future attainment and 

maintenance are provided. Chapter Three discusses this requirement in 

more detail and provides the attainment demonstration. 

ii.) SIP approval 

 The SIP for the area must be fully approved under Section 110(k) and must 

satisfy all the requirements that apply to the area. Ohio’s SIP was approved 

on May 9, 1994 (59FR23799), March 23, 1995 (60FR15235), and February 

1, 1996 (61FR3591) and includes the Columbus area. Chapter Five 

discusses this requirement in more. 

iii.) Permanent and enforceable improvement in air quality 

 The state must be able to reasonably attribute the improvement in air quality 

to emission reductions which are permanent and enforceable. The state 

should estimate the percent reduction achieved from federal measures as 

well as control measures that have been adopted and implemented by the 

state. 

 The Delaware, Franklin and Licking Counties portion of the Columbus area 

was designated marginal nonattainment for ozone as part of the 1990 CAA 

Amendments re-evaluation. The Fairfield, Knox, and Madison Counties 

portion of the Columbus area was designated unclassifiable/attainment for 

ozone as part of the 1990 CAA Amendments re-evaluation. As a result, it 
 4 

was not necessary for Ohio to adopt or implement control measures for these 

Counties beyond the federal measures, the initial 1979/1981 Statewide rules, 

and those 1994 and 1995 rules which applied to “rural” attainment areas. 

However, Ohio EPA has adopted several rules recently that will have an 

impact Statewide on ozone emissions in the future: 

• Portable Fuel Containers requirements 

• Architectural and Industrial Maintenance (AIM) Coatings rules 

• Consumer Products rules 

• Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) 

 Chapters Four and Five discuss this requirement in more detail.. 

iv.) Section 110 and Part D requirements 

 For purposes of redesignation, a state must meet all requirements of Section 

110 and Part D that were applicable prior to submittal of the complete 

redesignation request. 

 Part D consists of general requirements applicable to all areas which are 

designated nonattainment based on a violation of the NAAQS. 

 i.) Section 110(a) requirements 

Section 110(a) of Title I of the CAA contains the general requirements 

for a SIP. Section 110(a)(2) provides that the implementation plan 

submitted by a state must have been adopted by the state after 

reasonable public notice and hearing, and that, among other things, it 

must include enforceable emission limitations and other control 

measures, means or techniques necessary to meet the requirements 

of the CAA; provide for establishment and operation of appropriate 

devices, methods, systems and procedures necessary to monitor 

ambient air quality; provide for implementation of a source permit 

program to regulate the modification and construction of any 

stationary source within the areas covered by the plan; include 

provisions for the implementation of Part C, prevention of significant 

deterioration (PSD) and Part D, NSR permit programs; include criteria 

for stationary source emission control measures, monitoring, and 

reporting; include provisions for air quality modeling; and provides for 

public and local agency participation in planning and emission control 

rule development. In Ohio’s December 5, 2007 infrastructure SIP 

submission, Ohio verified that the State fulfills the requirements of 

Section 110(a)(2) of the Act. 

 ii.) Section 172(c) requirements 

 This Section contains general requirements for nonattainment plans. 

The requirements for reasonable further progress, identification of 
 5 

certain emissions increases, and other measures needed for 

attainment will not apply for redesignations because they only have 

meaning for areas not attaining the standard. The requirements for an 

emission inventory will be satisfied by the inventory requirements of 

the maintenance plan. Chapters Four and Five discuss this 

requirement in more detail. 

 ii.) Conformity 

The state must work with U.S. EPA to show that its SIP provisions are 

consistent with Section 176(c)(4) conformity requirements. The 

redesignation request should include conformity procedures, if the 

state already has these procedures in place. If a state does not have 

conformity procedures in place at the time that it submits a 

redesignation request, the state must commit to follow U.S. EPA’s 

conformity regulation upon issuance, as applicable. 

v.) Maintenance plans 

 Section 107(d)(3)(E) stipulates that for an area to be redesignated, U.S. EPA 

must fully approve a maintenance plan that meets the requirements of 

Section 175(A). The maintenance plan must constitute a SIP revision and 

must provide for maintenance of the relevant NAAQS in the area for at least 

10 years after redesignation. Section 175 (A) further states that the plan 

shall contain such additional measures, if any, as may be necessary to 

ensure such maintenance. 

In addition, the maintenance plan shall contain such contingency measures 

as the Administrator deems necessary to ensure prompt correction of any 

violation of the NAAQS. At a minimum, the contingency measures must 

include a requirement that the state will implement all measures contained in 

the nonattainment SIP prior to redesignation. 

States seeking redesignation of a nonattainment area should consider the 

following provisions: 

 a.) attainment inventory; 

 b.) maintenance demonstration; 

 c.) monitoring network; 

 d.) verification of continued attainment; and 

 e.) contingency plan. 

 Chapter Six discusses this requirement in more detail. 
 6 

CHAPTER THREE 

OZONE MONITORING

CAA Section107 (d)(3)(E)(i) 

Requirement 1 of 4 

A demonstration that the NAAQS for ozone, as published in 40 CFR 50.4, has been 

attained. 

Background

 There are eight monitors measuring ozone concentrations in this 

nonattainment area. These monitors are operated by Ohio EPA Division of 

Air Pollution Control, Central District Office. A listing of the design values 

based on the three-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 

eight-hour average ozone concentrations from 2006 through 2008 are shown 

in Table 1. The locations of the monitoring sites for this nonattainment area 

are shown on Figure 1. 
 7 

Demonstration

Figure 1 Map of the Columbus, OH nonattainment area and monitor 

locations 

 Requirement 2 of 4 

Ambient monitoring data quality assured in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10, recorded in the 

U.S. EPA air quality system (AQS) database, and available for public view. 

Demonstration

The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) has quality assured all data 

shown in Appendix A in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10 and the Ohio Quality 

Assurance Manual. Ohio EPA has recorded the data in the AQS database and 

therefore data are available to the public. 
 8 

Requirement 3 of 4 

A showing that the three-year average of the fourth highest values, based on data from 

all monitoring sites in the area or its affected downwind environs, are below 85 parts per 

billion (ppb). (This showing must rely on three (3) complete, consecutive calendar years 

of quality assured data.) 

 

Background

 The following information is taken from U.S. EPA's "Guideline on Data 

Handling Conventions for the eight-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS)," U.S. EPA-454/R-98-017, December 1998. 

Three (3) complete years of ozone monitoring data are required to 

demonstrate attainment at a monitoring site. The eight-hour primary and 

secondary ozone ambient air quality standards are met at an ambient air 

quality monitoring site when the three-year average of the annual fourthhighest daily maximum eight-hour average ozone concentrations is less than 

or equal to 0.08 ppm. When this occurs, the site is said to be in attainment. 

Three (3) significant digits must be carried in the computations. Because the 

third decimal digit, in ppm, is rounded, 0.084 ppm is the largest concentration 

that is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. Therefore, for the purposes of this 

request, the eight-hour standard is considered to be 0.085 ppm. Values 

below 0.085 ppm meet the standard, values equal to or greater than 0.085 

ppm exceed the standard. These data handling procedures are applied on 

an individual basis at each monitor in the area. An area is in compliance with 

the eight-hour ozone NAAQS if, and only if, every monitoring site in the area 

meets the NAAQS. An individual site's three (3)-year average of the annual 

fourth highest daily maximum eight-hour average ozone concentrations is 

also called the site's design value. 

Table 1 shows the monitoring data for 2006 – 2008 that were retrieved from 

the U.S. EPA AQS. The air quality design value for the area is the highest 

design value among all sites in the area. Please note that the standard is 

measured in ppm while the commonly used unit is ppb. For the remainder of 

this document, ppb will be used. 
 9 

Demonstration

 Table 1 Monitoring Data for the Columbus, OH area for 2006 – 2008 

 

Data source: U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS) 

 http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/index.htm

 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2006-2008 

SITE ID COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OBS 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE 

39-041-

0002 Delaware Delaware 2006 100 86 84 76 75

76 

39-041-

0002 Delaware Delaware 2007 100 87 83 81 80

39-041-

0002 Delaware Delaware 2008 99 80 76 75 75

39-049-

0028 Franklin 

Koebel 

School 2006 100 86 80 76 76

74 

39-049-

0028 Franklin 

Koebel 

School 2007 100 85 82 81 78

39-049-

0028 Franklin 

Koebel 

School 2008 99 78 70 69 69

39-049-

0029 Franklin New Albany 2006 99 87 85 85 82

84 

39-049-

0029 Franklin New Albany 2007 100 94 88 88 87

39-049-

0029 Franklin New Albany 2008 99 95 85 83 83

39-049-

0037 Franklin 

Franklin 

Park 2006 97 86 84 80 79

76 

39-049-

0037 Franklin 

Franklin 

Park 2007 98 89 81 81 79

39-049-

0037 Franklin 

Franklin 

Park 2008 99 87 81 72 71

39-049-

0081 Franklin 

Maple 

Canyon 2006 99 85 84 80 77

74 

39-049-

0081 Franklin 

Maple 

Canyon 2007 100 86 83 80 79

39-049-

0081 Franklin 

Maple 

Canyon 2008 100 88 73 66 66

39-083-

0002 Knox Centerburg 2006 98 85 82 76 75

76 

39-083-

0002 Knox Centerburg 2007 100 88 82 82 80

39-083-

0002 Knox Centerburg 2008 100 77 75 75 74
 10 

 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2006-2008 

SITE ID COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR %OBS 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR 8-HR AVERAGE 

39-089-

0005 Licking Heath 2006 100 82 77 74 72

74 

39-089-

0005 Licking Heath 2007 100 83 82 80 78

39-089-

0005 Licking Heath 2008 99 78 76 75 74

39-097-

0007 Madison London 2006 100 84 81 79 76

76 

39-097-

0007 Madison London 2007 99 91 86 84 83

39-097-

0007 Madison London 2008 99 77 75 73 71

Highest Average 84 ppb

The area's design values have trended downward as emissions have 

declined due to such factors as cleaner automobiles and fuels, both 

regionally and locally. 

Requirement 4 of 4 

A commitment that once redesignated, the state will continue to operate an appropriate 

monitoring network to verify the maintenance of the attainment status. 

Demonstration

 Ohio EPA commits to continue monitoring ozone levels at the sites indicated 

in Figure 1. Ohio EPA will consult with U.S. EPA Region V prior to making 

changes to the existing monitoring network, should changes become 

necessary in the future. Ohio EPA will continue to quality assure the 

monitoring data to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 58 and all other federal 

requirements. Connection to a central station and updates to the Ohio EPA 

web site1

 will provide real time availability of the data and knowledge of any 

exceedances. Ohio EPA will enter all data into AQS on a timely basis in 

accordance with federal guidelines. 

 

1

 www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/ 
 11 

CHAPTER FOUR 

EMISSION INVENTORY

CAA Section107 (d)(3)(E)(iii) 

U.S. EPA’s redesignation guidance requires the submittal of a comprehensive inventory of 

ozone precursor emissions (VOC and NOx) representative of the year when the area 

achieves attainment of the ozone air quality standard. Ohio also must demonstrate that the 

improvement in air quality between the year that violations occurred and the year that 

attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission reductions. 

Other emission inventory related requirements include a projection of the emission 

inventory to a year at least 10 years following redesignation; a demonstration that the 

projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the ozone standard; and a commitment 

to provide future updates of the inventory to enable tracking of emission levels during the 

10-year maintenance period. 

Requirement 1 of 5 

A comprehensive emission inventory of the precursors of ozone completed for the base 

year. 

Background

The point source data are taken from Ohio's annual emissions reporting 

program. The 2002 periodic inventory has been identified as one of the 

preferred data bases for SIP development and coincides with nonattainment 

air quality in the Columbus area. 

Periodic inventories, which include emissions from all sectors - mobile, area, 

non-road, and point sources - are prepared every three (3) years. 

Demonstration

The 2002 inventory is used as the base year for the purpose of this submittal 

and was submitted to U.S. EPA on June 15, 2007 along with the attainment 

demonstration for the Cleveland-Akron-Lorain area. The detailed emission 

inventory information for the Columbus area is provided in Appendix B. 

Emissions of VOC and NOx for 2002 are identified under Requirement Three 

of this Chapter. 

Requirement 2 of 5 

A projection of the emission inventory to a year at least 10 years following redesignation. 

Background

Ohio EPA prepared a comprehensive inventory for the Columbus area including 

area, mobile, and point sources for precursors of ozone (VOCs and NOx) for base 

years 2002 and 2005. The 2002 inventory was submitted to U.S. EPA on June 15, 

2007 and then supplemented on February 22, 2008 with the 2005 inventory, as part 
 12 

of the attainment demonstration for the Cleveland-Akron-Lorain area. The 

information below describes the procedures Ohio EPA used to generate the 2002 

base year inventory and to develop SIP-ready modeling inventories and future year 

projections (Pechan Report2

) based on a 2005 base year inventory. The report by 

Pechan generated future year estimates of annual emissions for each source sector 

using accepted growth surrogates. The on-road mobile source sector was 

addressed by specific modeling as addressed below. These inventories were 

provided to the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO) and have been 

processed to develop summer day emissions for use in the air quality analyses. 

These processed modeling inventories have been identified as the correct iteration 

of the inventory for use in the redesignation. In this document, references to LADCO 

include the Midwest Regional Planning Organization. 

• Area sources were taken from the Ohio 2005 periodic inventory 

submitted to U.S. EPA. These projections were made from the U.S. 

Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) growth 

factors, with some updated local information. 

• Mobile source emissions were calculated from MOVES2010 produced 

emission factors. 

• Point source information was compiled from Ohio EPA’s 2005 annual 

emissions inventory database and the 2005 U.S. EPA Air Markets 

acid rain database3

. 

• Biogenic emissions are not included in these summaries. 

• Non-road emissions were generated using U.S. EPA’s National Mobile 

Inventory Model (NMIM) 2002 application. To address concerns 

about the accuracy of some of the categories in U.S. EPA’s non-road 

emissions model, LADCO contracted with two (2) companies to 

review the base data and make recommendations. One of the 

contractors also estimated emissions for three (3) non-road categories 

not included in U.S. EPA’s non-road model. Emissions were estimated 

for aircraft, commercial marine vessels, and railroads. Recreational 

motorboat population and spatial surrogates (used to assign 

emissions to each county) were significantly updated. The populations 

for the construction equipment category were reviewed and updated 

based upon surveys completed in the midwest, and the temporal 

allocation for agricultural sources also was updated. 

 

 

Demonstration 

 

2 

http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/r5/reports/LADCO%202005%20Base%20Yr%20Growth%20and%20Controls%20R

eport_Final.pdf 

3 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/acidrain 
 13 

On-Road Emission Estimations 

In coordination with the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the 

Licking County Area Transportation Study (LCATS), the Mid-Ohio Regional 

Planning Commission (MORPC) utilizes a regional travel demand forecast 

model to simulate traffic in the area and to forecast traffic flows for given 

growth expectations. The model is primarily used as a long range planning 

tool to evaluate the transportation system including determination of locations 

where additional travel capacity may be needed and to determine the 

infrastructure requirements necessary to meet that need. It is also used as a 

tool for air quality purposes to estimate the total emissions of pollution 

caused by vehicles in the area. The travel demand forecasting model is used 

to predict the total daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and a U.S. EPA 

computer program called MOVES2010 is used to calculate emissions per 

mile. The product of these is the total amount of pollution emitted by the onroad vehicles for the area. In areas outside the regional travel demand 

model, traffic counts and central Ohio traffic growth rates are used for the 

VMT estimates. 

Overview 

Broadly described, MOVES2010 is used to generate “emission factors”, 

which are the average emissions per mile (grams/mile) for the ozone 

precursors, NOx and VOC. The MOVES2010 model includes a number of 

variables that affect the emission factors. These variables have national 

default values, some of which require modification to reasonably reflect local 

conditions. Some of these variables are discussed here. The vehicle fleet 

(vehicles on the road) age and the vehicle type have a major effect on the 

emission factors. The vehicle types are traveling on facility types (MOVES 

facility types are Rural Restricted Access, Rural Unrestricted Access, Urban 

Restricted Access, and Urban Unrestricted Access). The vehicle speeds also 

affect the emission factor values. Meteorological conditions such as air 

temperature and humidity have a significant effect on emission factors. 

Emission factors produced by MOVES2010 can also include the effect of 

emission reduction strategies such as vehicle inspection and maintenance 

programs, regulation of fuels, etc. These MOVES2010 inputs are estimated 

using the best available data. 

These inputs are reviewed and agreed to by U.S. EPA and transportation 

agencies in a formal interagency consultation process. Emission factors are 

multiplied by VMT from the travel demand model to estimate the total vehicle 

emissions. 

The emission factors from MOVES2010 can be used with the travel demand 

model information by combining the disaggregate emission rates with VMT, 

and source type population for each road type, source type and hour of day, 

and then sum them up to get the total emissions for the area. 
 14 

The Columbus area analysis method, developed by ODOT, is to aggregate 

the emission rates by two source types (cars & trucks), then applying VMT 

and source type population, thereby reducing the intensive processes. In the 

first step emission factors are broadly classified into total vehicles, cars and 

trucks by pollutant, by average speed, road type and hour of day. Then the 

hourly link volumes generated from travel demand model are combined with 

emission factors for each network link for each hour. The on-road vehicle 

emissions for the area is the sum of all individual link-hour emissions. 

Vehicle-based emissions are obtained by the combination of corresponding 

emission factors and source type population. Intrazonal emissions are 

computed using a separate method to account for those trips that use local 

roads to travel within a zone. Intrazonal VMT is combined with corresponding 

emission factors to get intrazonal emissions. Total emissions are sum of onroad vehicle emissions, vehicle-based emissions and intrazonal emissions. 

Automated programs, using FORTRAN and CUBE scripting, were developed 

by ODOT to generate total emissions. The process uses data on daily and 

directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay 

functions from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process also 

handles the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission 

factors. 

MOVES input and output sample files are provided in Appendix C. 

Best Available Data 

Most current vehicle age distribution data, temperature data, fuel properties 

data, source type distribution data, and I/M data provided by ODOT’s ATRs 

and WIMs, NOAA, ODPS, and Ohio EPA were used by the ODOT for 

generating emission factors. Likewise, the most current transportation 

planning data available from MORPC and LCATS and most current ODOT 

count data were used by ODOT for the emissions estimates. 

Analysis Years 

Analysis years for this redesignation request include 2002, 2006 (attainment 

year), 2012 (interim budget year), and 2020 to meet the requirements 

specified by the CAA and U.S. EPA. The travel demand model presents the 

transportation system conditions for each of these years. Model runs for 

each future analysis year contain the road network MORPC, LCATS, and 

ODOT expect to exist in April of that year with corresponding socioeconomic 

forecasts for that year. 

Local Road VMT 

Most local roads such as subdivision streets are not explicitly modeled in a 

travel demand model. These local roads are represented as fictitious 

roadways called centroid connectors. Local road VMT is included in the 
 15 

ODOT post process by including the traffic loaded on centroid connectors. In 

addition, some local road traffic is captured as intra-zonal trips which travel 

demand models usually do not assign to roadway segments. The ODOT 

post process includes these trips as local road VMT. 

Model area VMT 

VMT for the analysis comes mostly from the MORPC model. However, the 

model does not cover the entire air quality maintenance area. For outside 

areas, VMT is estimated from HPMS projections. This extra VMT is added 

into the calculations similarly to the way intrazonal VMT was. 

 

Emission Estimations 

Tables 2 through 7 contain the results of the emissions analysis for the 

appropriate years. 

Table 2 - Delaware County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile 

Sources 

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 4,482,756 5,001,802 5,811,519 7,141,185

VOC (tons/day) 13.09 9.99 6.31 3.78

NOx (tons/day) 24.62 21.07 14.63 8.49

Table 3 - Fairfield County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile 

Sources 

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 3,012,847 3,509,902 3,692,318 4,291,725

VOC (tons/day) 6.02 5.70 3.50 2.07

NOx (tons/day) 13.03 12.68 8.12 4.65

Table 4 - Franklin County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile 

Sources

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 30,473,707 33,989,641 34,609,039 37,688,274

VOC (tons/day) 144.87 112.93 61.46 31.88

NOx (tons/day) 224.34 194.95 118.11 59.96

Table 5 - Knox County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 1,117,218 1,214,433 1,299,798 1,443,959

VOC (tons/day) 2.01 1.76 1.12 0.65

NOx (tons/day) 4.46 3.94 2.55 1.44
 16 

Table 6 - Licking County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile 

Sources 

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 5,399,830 5,409,966 5,613,225 6,557,551

VOC (tons/day) 18.08 13.29 6.99 4.02

NOx (tons/day) 32.13 25.92 15.34 8.56

Table 7 - Madison County Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile 

Sources

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 2,373,505 2,415,515 2,586,771 2,950,763

VOC (tons/day) 5.57 3.80 2.35 1.37

NOx (tons/day) 11.24 8.47 5.47 3.09

Table 8 - Emission Estimation Totals for On-Road Mobile Sources for the 

 Columbus Area 

 2002 2006 2012 2020 

VMT (miles/day) 46,859,863 51,541,259 53,612,670 60,073,457

VOC (tons/day) 189.64 147.47 81.73 43.77

NOx (tons/day) 309.82 267.03 164.22 86.19

Motor Vehicle Emission Budget 

Table 9 contains the motor vehicle emissions budget for the Columbus area. 

Table 9 - Mobile Vehicle Emissions Budget for the Columbus Area 

 2012 2020 

VOC (tons/day) 93.99 50.34 

NOx (tons/day) 188.85 99.12 

The above budget includes the emission estimates calculated for 2012 and 

2020 with an additional 15 percent margin of safety. The emission estimates 

are derived from the Tranplan travel demand model and MOVES2010 as 

described above under the expected MORPC and LCATS 2030 Long Range 

Plans and known projects in the areas not included within either MPO’s 

jurisdiction. The additional 15 percent translates into an additional 6.57 

tons/day for VOC and 12.93 tons/day for NOx for 2020. Appendix C contains 

data tables and graphs of these emissions. 

All methodologies, the latest planning assumptions, and the safety margins 

were determined through the interagency consultation process described in 

the Transportation Conformity Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among 

MORPC, LCATS, Ohio DOT, and Ohio EPA. 
 17 

The current eight-hour budgets were adopted (72 FR 23815) based on a previous 

redesignation request submitted for the Columbus area. Those budgets were found 

adequate and adopted as a separate action as the redesignation request was not 

approved. Those eight-hour budgets will no longer be applicable either after the effective 

date of the approved redesignation or after the effective date of any U.S. EPA action 

approving a finding that the eight-hour conformity budget included in this submittal is 

adequate for transportation conformity purposes, whichever date comes first.” 

Requirement 3 of 5 

A demonstration that the projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain the ozone 

standard. 

Background

In consultation with U.S. EPA, Ohio EPA selected the year 2020 as the 

maintenance year for this redesignation request. This document contains 

projected emissions inventories for 2012 and 2020. 

Emission projections for the Columbus area were performed using the 

following approaches: 

• As performed by MORPC, mobile source emission projections are 

based on the U.S. EPA MOVES2010 model. The analysis is 

described in more detail in Appendix C. All projections were made in 

accordance with “Procedures for Preparing Emissions Projections” 

U.S. EPA-45/4-91-019. 

• Emissions inventories are required to be projected to future dates to 

assess the influence growth and future controls will have. LADCO 

has developed growth and control files for point, area, and non-road 

categories. These files were used to develop the future-year 

emissions estimates used in this document. This was done so the 

inventories used for redesignation are consistent with modeling 

performed in the future. Appendix D contains LADCO’s technical 

support document detailing the analysis used to project emissions. 

The 2006 attainment year was grown from the 2005 LADCO modeling 

inventory using LADCO’s growth factors. The 2020 maintenance year 

was grown from the 2018 LADCO modeling inventory using LADCO’s 

growth factors. 

The detailed inventory information for the Columbus area for 2002 is in 

Appendix B. Emission trends are an important gauge for continued 

compliance with the ozone standard. Therefore, Ohio EPA performed an 

initial comparison of the inventories for the base year and maintenance 

years. Mobile source emission inventories are described in Section 5 of 

Appendix B. 
 18 

Sectors included in the following tables are: Electrical Generating Unit (EGUPoint); Non-Electrical Generating Unit (Non-EGU); Non-road Mobile (Nonroad); Other Area (Other); Marine; Aircraft; Rail (MAR); and On-road Mobile 

(On-road). 

Maintenance is demonstrated when the future-year (2020) projected 

emission totals are below the 2006 attainment year totals. 

The emissions data in the tables below are based on the following data 

sources: 

All On-Road Data 

 source: MORPC Transportation and Modeling Department 

All Other Data source: Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO) and Lake Michigan Air 

 Directors Consortium (LADCO) Web site (Base M): 

 http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/

Demonstration

VOC 

 Table 10 Delaware County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day) 

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU 

Point n/a n/a 

n/a n/a

NonEGU 0.30 0.44 0.54 0.69 

Nonroad 4.14 5.23 3.77 3.77 

Other 5.40 5.94 4.83 4.39 

MAR 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.05 

Onroad 13.09 9.99 6.31 3.78 

TOTAL 23.07 21.72 15.54 12.68 9.04 

 

 
 19 

Table 11 Fairfield County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day) 

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU 

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

NonEGU 0.20 0.26 0.27 0.28 

Nonroad 1.87 2.16 1.61 1.61 

Other 4.97 6.13 5.06 4.58 

MAR 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 

Onroad 6.02 5.70 3.50 2.07 

TOTAL 13.07 14.26 10.45 8.55 5.71 

 

 Table 12 Franklin County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day) 

Sector 2002 

Base 

2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-EGU 3.03 3.00 3.34 3.86 

Non-road 16.97 21.11 16.08 16.08 

Other 43.07 46.53 36.98 32.38 

MAR 0.54 0.51 0.48 0.41 

On-road 144.87 112.93 61.46 31.88 

TOTAL 208.48 184.08 118.34 84.61 99.47 

 

 Table 13 Knox County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day) 

Sector 2002 

Base 

2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-EGU n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-road 1.05 1.50 1.04 1.04 0.46 

Other 3.96 3.29 2.86 2.71 0.58 

MAR 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

On-road 2.01 1.76 1.12 0.65 

TOTAL 7.05 6.55 5.02 4.40 2.15 

Table 14 Licking County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 
 20 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin

EGU 

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

NonEGU 0.49 0.52 0.58 0.70 

Nonroad 2.43 3.46 2.47 2.47 

Other 6.23 8.37 6.88 6.11 

MAR 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Onroad 18.08 13.29 6.99 4.02 

TOTAL 27.31 25.64 16.92 13.30 12.34 

 

 Table 15 Madison County VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU 

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

NonEGU 0.00 0.13 0.15 0.19 

Nonroad 1.06 1.39 0.98 0.98 

Other 4.65 2.98 2.61 2.49 

MAR 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 

On-road 5.57 3.80 2.35 1.37 

TOTAL 11.31 8.33 6.12 5.05 3.28 

 

Table 16 Columbus Area VOC Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day) 
 21 

VOC 2002 

Base 

2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

Delaware 23.07 21.72 15.54 12.68 

Fairfield 13.07 14.26 10.45 8.55 

Franklin 208.48 184.08 118.34 84.61 

Knox 7.05 6.55 5.02 4.40 

Licking 27.31 25.64 16.92 13.30 

Madison 11.31 8.33 6.12 5.05 

COMBINED VOC 

TOTAL 290.29 260.58 172.39 128.59 131.99 

 

NOx 

Table 17 Delaware County NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU 

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-EGU 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.05 

Non-road 2.53 5.84 4.19 1.99 

Other 0.63 1.24 1.25 1.26 

MAR 3.01 2.17 1.84 1.32 

On-road 24.62 21.07 14.63 8.49 

TOTAL 30.81 30.37 21.95 13.11 17.26 

 

Table 18 Fairfield County NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per 

day) 

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-EGU 5.37 4.38 4.13 4.17 

Non-road 2.14 3.82 2.75 1.30 

Other 0.39 0.90 0.91 0.92 

MAR 0.28 0.25 0.22 0.18 

On-road 13.03 12.68 8.12 4.65 

TOTAL 21.21 22.03 16.13 11.22 10.81 

Table 19 Franklin County NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per 

day) 
 22 

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU 

Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

NonEGU 2.43 2.13 2.06 2.21 

Nonroad 18.54 22.30 15.50 7.03 

Other 4.47 10.69 10.82 10.87 

MAR 6.47 4.73 4.23 3.46 

Onroad 224.34 194.95 118.11 59.96 

TOTAL 256.25 234.80 150.72 83.53 151.27 

 

Table 20 Knox County NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per 

day) 

Sector 2002 

Base 

2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-EGU 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 

Non-road 1.37 1.99 1.45 0.74 

Other 0.35 0.60 0.61 0.62 

MAR 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 

On-road 4.46 3.94 2.55 1.44 

TOTAL 6.74 6.57 4.65 2.84 3.73 

 

Table 21 Licking County NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per 

day)

Sector 2002 Base 2006 

Attainment

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU n/a n/a n/a n/a 
 23 

Point 

Non-EGU 1.72 2.69 2.90 3.27 

Non-road 2.64 3.68 2.64 1.29 

Other 0.77 1.59 1.60 1.61 

MAR 1.90 0.09 0.10 0.10 

On-road 32.13 25.92 15.34 8.56 

TOTAL 39.16 33.97 22.58 14.83 19.14 

 

Table 22 Madison County NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 

2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons per 

day)

Sector 2002 

Base 

2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

EGU Point n/a n/a n/a n/a 

Non-EGU 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 

Non-road 1.83 2.40 1.84 1.05 

Other 0.23 0.41 0.42 0.42 

MAR 0.63 0.43 0.37 0.28 

On-road 11.24 8.47 5.47 3.09 

TOTAL 2.69 3.25 2.64 1.76 1.49 

 

Table 23 Columbus Area NOx Emission Inventory Totals for Base 

 Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012 and 2020 (tons 

 per day) 

NOx 2002 

Base 

2006 

Attainment 

2012 

Interim 

2020 

Maintenance 

Safety 

Margin 

Delaware 30.81 30.37 21.95 13.11 

Fairfield 21.21 22.03 16.13 11.22 

Franklin 256.25 234.80 150.72 83.53 

Knox 6.74 6.57 4.65 2.84 

Licking 39.16 33.97 22.58 14.83 

Madison 2.69 3.25 2.64 1.76 

COMBINED NOx

TOTAL 356.86 330.99 218.67 127.29 203.70 

VOC and NOx 

 Table 24 Columbus Area Comparison of 2006 attainment year and 

 2020 projected emission estimates (tons per day, summer) 

2006 2020 Projected 
 24 

Decrease 

VOC 260.58 128.59 131.99 

NOx 330.99 127.29 203.70 

As shown in the table above, VOC emissions in the nonattainment area are 

projected to decrease by 131.99tons/day. Point sources show a slight 

increase due to expectations that the population will grow in this area; 

however, cleaner vehicles and fuels are expected to be in place in 2009 and 

2018 and they cause an overall drop in VOC emissions. 

NOx emissions in the nonattainment area are projected to decrease by 

203.70tons/day. Again, area source emissions and, to a lesser extent, point 

sources show a slight increase due to expectations that the population will 

grow in this area. Decreases from U.S. EPA rules covering Tier 2 Motor 

Vehicle Emissions Standards and Gasoline Sulfur Control Requirements4

, 

Highway Heavy-Duty Engine Rule5, Non-Road Diesel Engine Rule6, and the 

Clean Air Interstate Rule7

 are factored into the changes. 

As identified in Table 9 above, an additional 15 percent margin of safety is being 

requested for mobile emissions. The additional 15 percent translates into an 

additional 6.57 tons/day for VOC and 12.93 tons/day for NOx for 2020. U.S. 

EPA’s conformity regulations allow for allocation, through a revision to the SIP, 

all or some portion of the overall area’s safety margin (emission reductions from 

2006 to 2020) to the mobile emissions budgets for future conformity. Ohio chose 

to allocate 6.57 tpd of the 131.99tpd safety margin for VOC and 12.93 tpd of the 

203.70tpd safety margin for NOx as a mobile emissions budget 15% safety 

margin. 

Requirement 4 of 5 

A demonstration that improvement in air quality between the year violations occurred and 

the year attainment was achieved is based on permanent and enforceable emission 

reductions and not on temporary adverse economic conditions or unusually favorable 

meteorology. 

Background

Ambient air quality data from all monitoring sites indicate that air quality met 

the NAAQS for ozone in 2006-2008. U.S. EPA’s redesignation guidance (p 

9) states: “A state may generally demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS by 

either showing that future emissions of a pollutant or its precursors will not 

exceed the level of the attainment inventory, or by modeling to show that the 

 

4 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2000/February/Day-10/a19a.htm 5 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm 6 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/1998/October/Day-23/a24836.htm 7 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2005/May/Day-12/a5723a.pdf 
 25 

future mix of sources and emissions rates will not cause a violation of the 

NAAQS.” 

Demonstration

Permanent and enforceable reductions of VOC and NOx emissions have 

contributed to the attainment of the eight-hour ozone standard. Some of 

these reductions were due to the application of tighter federal standards on 

new vehicles. Also, Title IV of the CAA and the NOx SIP Call required the 

reduction of NOx emissions from utility sources. 

Table 25 Columbus Area Combined Comparison of 2002 base year and 

2006 attainment year on-road and EGU reductions 

All On-Road Data source: MORPC Transportation and Modeling Department 

All Other Data source: Midwest Regional Planning Organization (MRPO) and Lake Michigan Air 

 Directors Consortium (LADCO) Web site (Base M): 

 http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/

 

2002 2006 

On-road VOC 189.64 147.47 

On-road NOx 309.82 267.03 

EGU NOx n/a n/a 

Requirement 5 of 5 

Provisions for future annual updates of the inventory to enable tracking of the emission 

levels, including an annual emission statement from major sources. 

Demonstration

In Ohio, major point sources in all counties are required to submit air 

emissions information annually, in accordance with U.S. EPA’s Consolidated 

Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR). Ohio EPA prepares a new periodic 

inventory for all ozone precursor emission sectors every three (3) years. 

These ozone precursor inventories will be prepared for future years as 

necessary to comply with the inventory reporting requirements established in 

the CFR. Emissions information will be compared to the 2002 base year and 

the 2020 projected maintenance year inventories to assess emission trends, 

as necessary, and to assure continued compliance with the ozone standard. 
 26 

CHAPTER FIVE 

CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS

CAA Section107 d)(3)(E)(ii), 107(d)(3)(iv) & 107(d)(3)(E)(v) 

Requirement 1 of 5

Section 182(a) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires states with marginal 

nonattainment areas to implement RACT under Section 172(b). 

Background

Section 182(b) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments requires states with 

moderate nonattainment areas to submit a SIP to correct, or add, RACT 

requirements under Section 172(b) (as in effect immediately before the 

enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990). 

Demonstration

As required under the 1-hour ozone standard, Ohio EPA submitted VOC 

RACT rules which U.S. EPA approved on April 25, 1996 (61 FR 18255), 

September 7, 1994 (59 FR 46182), and October 23, 1995 (60 FR 54308). 

Statewide RACT rules have been applied to all new sources locating in Ohio 

since that time. RACT requirements are incorporated into permits along with 

monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting necessary to ensure ongoing 

compliance. Ohio EPA also has an active enforcement program to address 

violations discovered by field office staff. The Ohio RACT rules are found in 

OAC Chapter 3745-218

. 

Requirement 2 of 5

Section 182(a)(3)(B) requires states to submit emissions statements. 

Background

Section 182(a)(3)(B) requires states to submit emissions statements within 

two years of the enactment of the Clean Air Act Amendments and then every 

three years thereafter. 

Demonstration

Ohio EPA submitted its emissions statement SIP on March 18, 1994 which 

was approved by U.S. EPA on October 13, 1995 (59 FR 51863). As 

discussed in Chapter 4 (requirement 4), Ohio EPA submits, and commits to 

submit, emission inventories (statements) every three years. 

Requirement 3 of 5

Evidence that control measures required in past ozone SIP revisions have been fully 

implemented. 

 

8 http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/regs/3745-21/3745_21.html 
 27 

Background

In addition to the historic RACT requirements and those mentioned above, 

the U.S. EPA NOx SIP Call required 22 states to pass rules that would result 

in significant emission reductions from large EGUs, industrial boilers, and 

cement kilns in the eastern United States. Ohio passed this rule in 2001. 

NOx SIP Call requirements are incorporated into permits along with 

monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting necessary to ensure ongoing 

compliance. Ohio EPA also has an active enforcement program to address 

violations discovered by field office staff. Compliance is tracked through the 

Clean Air Markets data monitoring program. Beginning in 2004, this rule 

accounts for a reduction of approximately 31 percent of all NOx emissions 

statewide compared to previous uncontrolled years. The other 21 states also 

have adopted these rules. 

On March 10, 2004, the U.S. EPA promulgated the CAIR. Beginning in 

2009, U.S. EPA’s CAIR rule requires EGUs in 28 eastern states and the 

District of Columbia to significantly reduce emissions of NOx. CAIR will 

replace the NOx SIP Call for EGUs. National NOx emissions will be cut from 

4.5 million tons in 2004, to a cap of 1.5 million tons by 2009, and 1.3 million 

tons in 2018 in 28 states. States were required to submit a CAIR SIP as part 

of this effort. Ohio submitted a CAIR SIP which was approved by U.S. EPA 

on February 1, 2007. U.S. EPA projects that in 2009 emissions of NOx will 

decrease from a baseline of 264,000 tons per year to 91,000 tons per year 

within Ohio9

. 

Demonstration

U.S. EPA and Ohio EPA performed modeling that indicated this area would 

attain the eight-hour ozone standard with the implementation of the NOx SIP 

Call. Controls for EGUs formally commenced May 31, 2004. Emissions 

covered by this program have been generally trending downward since 1998 

with larger reductions occurring in 2002 and 2003. Data taken from the U.S. 

EPA Clean Air Markets web site, quantify the gradual NOx reductions that 

have occurred in Ohio as a result of Title IV of the 1990 CAA Amendments 

and the beginning of the NOx SIP Call Rule. Ohio developed the NOx Budget 

Trading Program rules in OAC Chapter 3745-1410 in response to the SIP 

Call. OAC Chapter 3745-14 regulates EGUs and certain non-EGUs under a 

cap and trade program based on an 85 percent reduction of NOx emissions 

from EGUs and a 60 percent reduction of NOx emissions from non-EGUs, 

compared to historical levels. This cap will stay in place through 2008, at 

which time the CAIR program will supersede it as discussed above. 

 

9

 http://www.epa.gov/cair/pdfs/0053-2228.pdf 

10 http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/regs/3745-14/3745_14.html 
 28 

On April 21, 2004, U.S. EPA published Phase II of the NOx SIP Call that 

establishes a budget for large (greater than 1 ton per day emissions) 

stationary internal combustion engines. Ohio EPA’s OAC rule 3745-14-12 

addresses stationary internal combustion engines, all used in natural gas 

pipeline transmissions. U.S. EPA approved this revision to the SIP on April 4, 

2008. An 82 percent NOx reduction from 1995 levels is anticipated. 

Completion of the compliance plan occurred by May 1, 2006 and the 

compliance demonstration began May 1, 2007. The 2007 controlled NOx 

emissions is 599 tons statewide for the ozone season. 

Tier II Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur Standards 

In February 2000, U.S. EPA finalized a federal rule to significantly reduce 

emissions from cars and light trucks, including sport utility vehicles (SUVs). 

Under this proposal, automakers will be required to sell cleaner cars, and 

refineries will be required to make cleaner, lower sulfur gasoline. This rule 

will apply nationwide. The federal rules will phase in between 2004 and 

2009. U.S. EPA has estimated that NOx emission reductions will be 

approximately 77 percent for passenger cars, 86 percent for smaller SUVs, 

light trucks, and minivans, and 65 to 95 percent reductions for larger SUVs, 

vans, and heavier trucks. VOC emission reductions will be approximately 12 

percent for passenger cars, 18 percent for smaller SUVs, light trucks, and 

minivans, and 15 percent for larger SUVs, vans, and heavier trucks. 

Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines 

In July 2000, U.S. EPA issued a final rule for Highway Heavy Duty Engines, a 

program which includes low-sulfur diesel fuel standards, which will be phased 

in from 2004 through 2007. This rule applies to heavy-duty gasoline and 

diesel trucks and buses. This rule will result in a 40 percent reduction in NOx

from diesel trucks and buses, a large sector of the mobile sources NOx

inventory. 

Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule 

In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule. This rule 

applies to diesel engines used in industries such as construction, agriculture, 

and mining. It also contains a cleaner fuel standard similar to the highway 

diesel program. The new standards will cut emissions from non-road diesel 

engines by more than 90 percent. Non-road diesel equipment, as described 

in this rule, currently accounts for 47 percent of diesel particulate matter (PM) 

and 25 percent of NOx from mobile sources nationwide. Sulfur levels will be 

reduced in non-road diesel fuel by 99 percent from current levels, from 

approximately 3,000 parts per million (ppm) now to 15 ppm in 2009. New 

engine standards take effect, based on engine horsepower, starting in 2008. 

Together, these rules will substantially reduce local and regional sources of 

ozone precursors. 
 29 

Requirement 4 of 5

Acceptable provisions to provide for new source review. 

Background

Ohio has a long standing and fully implemented New Source Review (NSR) 

program. This is addressed in OAC Chapter 3745-3111. The Chapter 

includes provisions for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 

permitting program in OAC rules 3745-31-01 to 3745-31-20. Ohio's PSD 

program was conditionally approved on October 10, 2001 (66 FR 51570) and 

received final approval on January 22, 2003 (68FR 2909) by U.S. EPA as 

part of the SIP. 

Demonstration

Any facility that is not listed in the 2002 emission inventory, or for the closing 

of which credit was taken in demonstrating attainment, will not be allowed to 

construct, reopen, modify, or reconstruct without meeting all applicable NSR 

requirements. Once the area is redesignated, Ohio EPA will implement NSR 

through the PSD program. 

Requirement 5 of 5

Assure that all existing control measures will remain in effect after redesignation unless the 

State demonstrates through photochemical modeling that the standard can be maintained 

without one (1) or more control measures. 

Demonstration

Ohio commits to maintaining the aforementioned control measures after 

redesignation. Ohio hereby commits that any changes to its rules or 

emission limits applicable to VOC and/or NOx sources, as required for 

maintenance of the ozone standard in the Columbus area, will be submitted 

to U.S. EPA for approval as a SIP revision. 

Ohio, through Ohio EPA’s Legal section, has the legal authority and 

necessary resources to actively enforce any violations of its rules or permit 

provisions. After redesignation, it intends to continue enforcing all rules that 

relate to the emission of ozone precursors in the Columbus area. 

 

11 http://www.epa.state.oh.us/dapc/regs/3745-31/3745_31.html 
 30 

CHAPTER SIX 

CONTINGENCY MEASURES 

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) 

Requirement 1 of 4

A commitment to submit a revised plan eight (8) years after redesignation. 

Demonstration

Ohio hereby commits to review its maintenance plan eight (8) years after 

redesignation, as required by Section 175(A) of the CAA. 

Requirement 2 of 4

A commitment to expeditiously enact and implement additional contingency control 

measures in response to exceeding specified predetermined levels (triggers) or in the event 

that future violations of the ambient standard occurs. 

Demonstration

Ohio hereby commits to adopt and expeditiously implement necessary 

corrective actions in the following circumstances: 

Warning Level Response: 

A warning level response shall be prompted whenever an annual (1-year) 

fourth high monitored value of 88 ppb occurs in a single ozone season within 

the maintenance area. A warning level response will consist of a study to 

determine whether the ozone value indicates a trend toward higher ozone 

values or whether emissions appear to be increasing. The study will evaluate 

whether the trend, if any, is likely to continue and, if so, the control measures 

necessary to reverse the trend taking into consideration ease and timing for 

implementation as well as economic and social considerations. 

Implementation of necessary controls in response to a warning level 

response trigger will take place as expeditiously as possible, but in no event 

later than 12 months from the conclusion of the most recent ozone season 

(September 30). 

Should it be determined through the warning level study that action is 

necessary to reverse the noted trend, the procedures for control selection 

and implementation outlined under action level response shall be followed. 

Action Level Response: 

An action level response shall be prompted whenever a two-year average 

fourth high monitored value of 85 parts per billion (ppb) or greater occurs 

within the maintenance area. A violation of the standard (three-year average 

fourth high value of 85 ppb or greater) shall also prompt an action level 
 31 

response. In the event that the action level is triggered and is not found to be 

due to an exceptional event, malfunction, or noncompliance with a permit 

condition or rule requirement, Ohio EPA in conjunction with the metropolitan 

planning organization or regional council of governments, will determine 

additional control measures needed to assure future attainment of the 

NAAQS for ozone. In this case, measures that can be implemented in a 

short time will be selected in order to be in place within 18 months from the 

close of the ozone season that prompted the action level. Ohio EPA will also 

consider the timing of an action level trigger and determine if additional, 

significant new regulations not currently included as part of the maintenance 

provisions will be implemented in a timely manner and will constitute our 

response. 

 Control Measure Selection and Implementation 

Adoption of any additional control measures is subject to the necessary 

administrative and legal process. This process will include publication of 

notices, an opportunity for public hearing, and other measures required by 

Ohio law for rulemaking. 

If a new measure/control is already promulgated and scheduled to be 

implemented at the federal or State level, and that measure/control is 

determined to be sufficient to address the upward trend in air quality, 

additional local measures may be unnecessary. Furthermore, Ohio will 

submit to U.S. EPA an analysis to demonstrate the proposed measures are 

adequate to return the area to attainment. 

Requirement 3 of 4

A list of potential contingency measures that would be implemented in such an event. 

Demonstration

Contingency measures to be considered will be selected from a 

comprehensive list of measures deemed appropriate and effective at the time 

the selection is made. The selection of measures will be based on costeffectiveness, emission reduction potential, economic and social 

considerations or other factors that Ohio EPA deems appropriate. Ohio EPA 

will solicit input from all interested and affected persons in the maintenance 

area prior to selecting appropriate contingency measures. Because it is not 

possible at this time to determine what control measure will be appropriate at 

an unspecified time in the future, the list of contingency measures outlined 

below is not exhaustive. 

1) Lower Reid vapor pressure gasoline program. 

2) Adopt VOC RACT on existing sources covered by U.S. EPA Control 

Technique Guidelines issued after the 1990 CAA. 
 32 

3) Apply VOC RACT to smaller existing sources. 

4) One or more transportation control measures sufficient to achieve at 

least half a percent reduction in actual areawide VOC emissions. 

Transportation measures will be selected from the following, based 

upon the factors listed above after consultation with affected local 

governments: 

a) trip reduction programs, including, but not limited to, employerbased transportation management plans, areawide rideshare 

programs, work schedule changes, and telecommuting; 

b) traffic flow and transit improvements; and 

c) other new or innovative transportation measures not yet in 

widespread use that affects local governments deemed 

appropriate.

5) Alternative fuel and diesel retrofit programs for fleet vehicle 

operations. 

6) High volume, low pressure coating application requirements for 

autobody facilities.

7) Requirements for cold cleaner degreaser operations (low vapor 

pressure solvents). 

8) Require VOC or NOx emission offsets for new and modified major 

sources. 

9) Require VOC or NOx emission offsets for new and modified minor 

sources. 

10) Increase the ratio of emission offsets required for new sources. 

11) Require VOC or NOx controls on new minor sources (less than 100 

tons). 

12) Adopt NOx RACT for existing combustion sources. 

No contingency measure shall be implemented without providing the 

opportunity for full public participation during which the relative costs and 

benefits of individual measures, at the time they are under consideration, can 

be fully evaluated. 
 33 

Requirement 4 of 4 

A list of VOC and NOx sources potentially subject to future additional control 

requirements. 

Demonstration

The following is a list of VOC and NOx sources potentially subject to future 

controls. 

NOx RACT 

• EGUs 

• asphalt batching plants 

• industrial/commercial and institutional boilers 

• process heaters 

• internal combustion engines 

• combustion turbines 

• other sources greater than 100 tons per year 

VOC RACT 

• automobile refinishing shops 

• cold cleaner degreasers 

• synthetic organic compound manufacturing 

• organic compound batch processes 

• wood manufacturing 

• industrial wastewater 

• aerospace industry 

• bakeries 

• plastic parts coating 

• volatile organic liquid storage 

• industrial solvent cleaning 

• offset lithography 

• industrial surface coating 

• other sources greater than 50 tons per year 
 34 

CHAPTER SEVEN 

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Ohio published notification for a public hearing and solicitation for public comment 

concerning the draft redesignation petition and maintenance plan in the widely distributed 

county publications. 

The public hearing to receive comments on the redesignation request was held on 

December 4, 2012 at the Ohio EPA Central Office located at 50 West Town Street, Suite 

700, Columbus, Ohio. The public comment period closed on December 4, 2012. 

Comments received during the public comment period have been included in the final 

package. Appendix E includes a copy of the public notice and response to comments from 

the public hearing and comment period. 
 35 

CHAPTER EIGHT 

CONCLUSIONS

The Columbus ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 NAAQS for ozone and 

complied with the applicable provisions of the 1990 Amendments to the CAA regarding 

redesignations of ozone nonattainment areas. Documentation to that effect is contained 

herein. Ohio EPA has prepared a redesignation request and maintenance plan that meet 

the requirements of Section 110 (a)(1) of the 1990 CAA. 

Based on this presentation, the Columbus ozone nonattainment area meets the 

requirements for redesignation under the CAA and U.S. EPA guidance. Ohio has 

performed an analysis that shows the air quality improvements are due to permanent and 

enforceable measures. Furthermore, because this area is subject to significant transport of 

pollutants, significant regional NOx reductions will ensure continued compliance 

(maintenance) with the standard with an increasing margin of safety. 

The State of Ohio hereby requests that the Columbus ozone nonattainment area be 

redesignated to attainment simultaneously with U.S. EPA approval of the maintenance plan 

provisions contained herein. In addition, the State of Ohio requests that this maintenance 

plan satisfy the requirements of CAA Section 175A (b), for subsequent plan revisions 

required for areas redesignated for the one-hour ozone standard, as was the case with the 

Columbus ozone nonattainment area. 
This page left intentionally blank
CENTRAL OHIO ON-ROAD MOBILE EMISSION ESTIMATES

PREPARED FOR 

OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

CENTRAL OHIO SIP INVENTORY FOR THE 

8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD

SEPTEMBER, 2012 

Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission 

111 Liberty Street 

Columbus, Ohio 43215 

614-228-2663 

www.morpc.org
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates ii September, 2012 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................... 1

1.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................................... 3

2.1 ANALYSIS YEARS .................................................................................................................................................. 3

2.2 GENERAL METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................... 3

2.3 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ..................................................................................................................................... 4

2.3.1 INDEPENDENT VARIABLES ................................................................................................................................... 4

2.3.2 MODEL NETWORKS .............................................................................................................................................. 5

2.3.3 LOADED HIGHWAY NETWORKS ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.3.4 INTRAZONAL TRIPS.............................................................................................................................................. 8

2.4 EMISSION FACTOR GENERATION ........................................................................................................................... 8

2.4.1 VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................................. 23

2.4.2 TEMPERATURES ................................................................................................................................................. 23

2.5 COMPUTATIONS METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 23

2.5.1 AREAS WITH REGIONAL MODEL ........................................................................................................................ 23

2.5.2 AREAS WITHOUT REGIONAL MODEL .................................................................................................................. 24

3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 26

3.1.1 AREAS WITHIN THE REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ................................................................................ 26

3.1.2 AREAS PARTIALLY WITHIN THE REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL .............................................................. 26

3.1.3 AREA OUTSIDE REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ........................................................................................ 28

3.1.4 TOTAL EMISSIONS FOR THE COLUMBUS/CENTRAL OHIO AREA .......................................................................... 28

3.2 EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THE COLUMBUS/CENTRAL OHIO AREA .................................................................... 29

APPENDIX ................................................................................................................................................................ 30

LIST OF TABLES 

TABLE 1 – MOVES INPUTS ............................................................................................................................................ 9

TABLE 2 – TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY DATA ........................................................................................ 11

TABLE 3 – RAMP FRACTIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 11

TABLE 4 – SOURCE TYPE POPULATION FOR YEAR 2006 ............................................................................................... 12

TABLE 5 – VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION ...................................................................................................................... 13

TABLE 6 – ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................................................... 17

TABLE 7 – YEARLY HPMS VMT FOR 2006.................................................................................................................. 18

TABLE 8 – HOURLY VMT FRACTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 18

TABLE 9 – SAMPLE EMISSION FILE (RATE PER DISTANCE) FOR YEAR 2006 .................................................................. 22

TABLE 10 – SAMPLE EMISSION FILE (RATE PER VEHICLE) FOR YEAR 2006 .................................................................. 22

TABLE 11: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES - FRANKLIN COUNTY ...................................... 26

TABLE 12: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES - DELAWARE COUNTY .................................... 26

TABLE 13: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES - LICKING COUNTY ......................................... 26

TABLE 14A: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR FAIRFIELD COUNTY WITHIN THE TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AREA ............ 26

TABLE 14B: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR FAIRFIELD COUNTY OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AREAUSING HPMS DATA............................................................................................................................................. 27

TABLE 14C: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR FAIRFIELD COUNTY .................................................................................... 27

TABLE 15A: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR MADISON COUNTY WITHIN THE TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AREA ............. 27

TABLE 15B: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR MADISON COUNTY OUTSIDE OF THE TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AREA -

USING HPMS DATA............................................................................................................................................. 27

TABLE 15C: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR MADISON COUNTY ..................................................................................... 28

TABLE 16: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR KNOX COUNTY – USING ONLY HPMS .......................................................... 28

TABLE 17: EMISSION ESTIMATIONS FOR ON-ROAD MOBILE SOURCES FOR COLUMBUS/CENTRAL OHIO .................... 28

TABLE 18: VOC EMISSION INVENTORY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 29

TABLE 19: NOX EMISSION INVENTORY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 29
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates iii September, 2012 

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1: COLUMBUS, CENTRAL OHIO, 8-HOUR MARGINAL NON-ATTAINMENT AREA......................................... 2

FIGURE 2: POPULATION GROWTH – MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA ................................................................... 6

FIGURE 3: EMPLOYMENT GROWTH – MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA ................................................................. 6

FIGURE 4: VEHICLE TRIPS (PER DAY) GROWTH– MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA .............................................. 7

FIGURE 5: VMT (VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL) GROWTH – MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA ............................... 7
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 1 September, 2012 

1.0 Introduction & Background 

1.1 Introduction

This Report documents the on-road mobile emission estimates for the Columbus and Central 

Ohio area, in conjunction with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) update for Central Ohio area, primarily to update the emission 

budgets to MOVES based values. This report presents the summary of on road mobile 

emissions for the analysis years of 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 & 2035 of VOC (volatile organic 

compounds, gaseous compounds made of carbon and hydrogen) and NOx (Oxides of 

Nitrogen). VOC and NOx interacting with sunlight in the lower atmosphere develops the primary 

constituent of smog, Ozone, a criteria pollutant. These emissions documented here are the 

emissions due to on-road vehicles for the counties in the marginal nonattainment area of 

Central Ohio. The methodologies in computing emissions and forecasting models used are also 

summarized in this report. 

1.2 Background

Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA), because of the 1997 eight-hour ozone 

standard, on April 15, 2004, U.S. EPA issued final designations with regard to the 8-hour ozone 

standard, designating the central Ohio basic non-attainment area to be the six counties of 

Franklin, Delaware, Licking, Madison, Fairfield and Knox counties were designated as a basic 

nonattainment area for ozone. The CAAA defines nonattainment areas as geographic regions 

of the country that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In 

nonattainment areas, air quality implementation plans must be developed that identify strategies 

and programs that nonattainment areas will implement to provide the emission reductions 

needed for the areas to meet the NAAQS. In Ohio, OEPA is the lead agency for coordinating 

development of the SIP. The SIP includes actions done on a statewide basis as well as actions 

done within each specific nonattainment area of the state to achieve the air quality standards. 

Re-designation of an area from ‘eight-hour ozone basic non-attainment’ to attainment is based 

on criteria and guidance set forth by U.S. EPA. Re-designation requests to attainment include 

SIP revisions that document that the NAAQS have been met and provide a maintenance plan to 

ensure meeting the standards for the next ten years. One of the items of documentation 

contained in a re-designation request is three consecutive years of air quality monitoring data 

that meet the NAAQS. A Re-designation request to attainment was submitted to EPA in March 

2009. This re-designation request to attainment was approved on September 15, 2009, based 

on 1997 eight-hour ozone standard, which is 80 ppb (0.08 ppm). 

In September 2009, Central Ohio area reached attainment, by re-designation, based on 1997 

eight-hour ozone standard. However on May 21, 2012 US EPA’s Federal Register notice 

designated Columbus Central Ohio area as marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 eighthour ozone standard. Thus SIP update is required to establish new budgets for Ozone. Also 

incorporating MOVES program, in lieu of previously used MOBILE 6 program, as required by 

USEPA. This report updates ozone emissions inventory using MOVES software program. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 2 September, 2012 

1.3 Geographic Area of Analysis 

The six-county marginal non-attainment areas consist of two metropolitan planning 

organizations (MPOs), MORPC and LCATS and also areas outside of the two MPO’s in 

Fairfield, Madison, and Knox Counties, illustrated in Figure 1. The MORPC transportation 

planning area consists of Franklin County, Delaware County, Pataskala and Etna Township in 

Licking County, and Violet and Bloom Townships in Fairfield County. The LCATS transportation 

planning area covers the remainder of Licking County. The travel demand model area 

comprising MORPC and LCATS transportation planning areas is illustrated in Figure 1. Donut 

areas, referring to Figure 1, are the counties or portions of counties that are outside of the travel 

demand model area. As illustrated, these are portions of Fairfield and Madison counties and all 

of Knox county. On-road mobile emissions analysis methodologies for counties within the travel 

demand area, as well as for counties outside the model area are discussed in the next sections. 

The geographic area of re-designation request for the Columbus, Central Ohio area, comprises 

of six-counties: Franklin county, Delaware county, Licking county, Fairfield county, Madison 

county, and Knox county. 

FIGURE 1: COLUMBUS, CENTRAL OHIO, 8-HOUR MARGINAL NON-ATTAINMENT AREA
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 3 September, 2012 

2.0 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS 

The methodologies used and background information for estimating on-road mobile emissions 

are discussed in the foregoing sections for the geographic area of 8-hour ozone non-attainment 

area. 

2.1 Analysis Years

Year 2002 is the base year of analysis. 2006 is an attainment year, being one of the three clean 

air quality data monitoring years, of 2006, 2007 & 2008, showing attainment of the 1997 8-hour 

ozone standard. Years 2012 is an interim year analysis year, and 2020 is final maintenance 

budget year. The Transportation Plan horizon year for MORPC and LCATS is 2035. 2035 is 

provided to determine the longer term emissions trend. Thus, the years 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 

and 2035 was used for these on-road mobile emissions estimates. 

2.2 General Methodology

Evaluating emissions for current as well as future years requires several data inputs, discussed 

in the foregoing sections. Among these, vehicle travel characteristics data can be obtained from 

regionally maintained travel demand model. Travel demand model provides daily traffic 

volumes, congested travel times, speeds, v/c (volume to capacity ratios), VMT (vehicle miles 

traveled), VHT (vehicle hours traveled) among other input travel characteristics data used in 

evaluating emissions in this report. Areas that are not within the regional travel demand model 

boundary utilized HPMS (Highway Performance Monitoring Systems) based travel 

characteristics data. Thus, the travel demand model is used in evaluating emissions for 

Franklin county, Delaware county, and Licking county. Both the travel demand model as well as 

HPMS is used in evaluating emissions for Fairfield county and Madison county. HPMS only is 

used for the Knox county, in evaluating emissions. Each of the aforementioned process is 

detailed further in sections 2.5.1 and 2.5.2. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 4 September, 2012 

2.3 Travel Demand Model

For these analyses the latest planning assumptions available for the Central Ohio area were 

used. For the travel demand model, model validation is a joint process between MORPC, 

LCATS and the ODOT Office of Technical Services. In December 2004, a new complete 

validated model was accepted and installed for use at MORPC. The new model covers all of 

the MORPC and LCATS area including portions of Pickaway, Madison and Union Counties 

along with additional portions of Fairfield County outside of the MORPC MPO area. Further, 

MORPC continuously updates the highway and transit network information and maintains 

accurate networks for future year analysis. The new model used is a multi-step tour-based 

model, incorporating more advanced simulation methods than compared to traditional four step 

model. Thus model inputs were tested for quality control and quality assurance. Forecasted 

variables such as population, employment, traffic counts, roadway network, etc. were developed 

by MORPC in coordination with LCATS and used for the analysis. 

Due to the advance simulation methods incorporated, there is some variation in model results 

from one complete model run to another with all of the same input data. MORPC performed a 

check on this variability with regard to on-road mobile emission estimates. The emission 

estimates for several 2002 model runs were calculated. The variation in the emission estimates 

were less than one-tenth of one percent (0.1%). Thus it was determined that the variability due 

to the simulation is insignificant. 

2.3.1 Independent Variables

Independent variables (land use/socio-economic data) were developed as well as interpolated 

for intermediate years of analysis. Trip tables for the analysis years 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 

and 2035 were developed. MORPC continually monitors land use, population and employment 

information. MORPC performs complete land use inventories every five years. The complete 

documentation of the process and future forecasts is provided in 2012-2035 Transportation 

Plans completed in May 2012 by MOPRC and LCATS. 

Figure 2 illustrates population growth trends for the travel demand model area, indicating a 

growth in population of 1.5 million from year 2002 to 2.2 million in the year 2035, with population 

estimates of 1.59, 1.71, and 1.89 million in the years 2006, 2012, and 2020 respectively. 

Figure 3 illustrates employment growth trends for the travel demand model area, indicating a 

growth in employment of 851,000 from year 2002 to 1,125,000 in year 2035, with employment 

of 901,000 in year 2006, an estimated employment of 850,000 in year 2012, and projected 

employment of 945,000 in the year 2020. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 5 September, 2012 

2.3.2 Model Networks

MORPC staff in conjunction with LCATS and ODOT continuously update the model networks to 

accurately reflect projects in the current TIP and Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The 

Transportation Plan horizon year for MORPC and LCATS is 2035. The model networks 

developed for this emission estimates were for the analysis years 2002, 2006, 2012, 2020 and 

2035. 

Figure 4 illustrates typical daily vehicle trips growth trends for the travel demand model area, 

indicating a growth of 4.4 million daily vehicle trips from year 2002 to 6.3 million daily vehicle 

trips in year 2035, with 4.7, 4.8, and 5.4 daily million vehicle trips in the years 2006, 2012, and 

2020 respectively. 

Figure 5 illustrates VMT (vehicle miles of travel) growth trends for the travel demand model 

area, indicating a growth of 45.0 million daily VMT from year 2002 to 70.9 million daily VMT in 

year 2035, with 49.8, 51.5, and 58.2 million daily VMT in the years 2006, 2012, and 2020 

respectively. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 6 September, 2012 

FIGURE 2: POPULATION GROWTH – MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA

FIGURE 3: EMPLOYMENT GROWTH – MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

Population

Analysis Year

Population Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total Population (Model Area)

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

Employment

Analysis Year

Employment Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total Employment (Model Area)
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 7 September, 2012 

FIGURE 4: VEHICLE TRIPS (PER DAY) GROWTH– MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA

FIGURE 5: VMT (VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL) GROWTH – MORPC/LCATS MODEL AREA

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

7,000,000

Vehicle Trips

Analysis Year

Daily Vehicle Trips Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total Daily Trips (Model Area)

0

10,000,000

20,000,000

30,000,000

40,000,000

50,000,000

60,000,000

70,000,000

80,000,000

VMT

Analysis Year

VMT Growth of MORPC/LCATS Model Area

Franklin County

Delaware County

Licking County

Fairfield County (Model Area)

Madison County (Model Area)

Union County (Model Area)

Pickaway County (Model Area)

Total VMT (Model Area)
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 8 September, 2012 

2.3.3 Loaded Highway Networks

Trip assignment was run for 2002 baseline, 2006, 2012, 2020 and 2035 using CUBE. The 

assignments produced a loaded highway network for each analysis year. These loaded 

network files includes total volume for each link in the network. Programming scripts in CUBE 

(a model software), illustrated in Appendix A, incorporate ODOT’s CMAQ process, discussed in 

more detail in Section 2.5.1. The loaded highway network for each year was split into separate 

files for each county. Each county network was run independently through the CMAQ process 

for each analysis year, which combined the volumes and emission factors for computing VOC 

and NOx emissions for the entire county. 

2.3.4 IntraZonal Trips

Intrazonal trips are the trips that are generated within a traffic analysis zone (TAZ), that use 

local roads. Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the highway networks so Cube/Voyager 

emission calculation script requires a separate input file to account for these trips. Input files for 

evaluating intrazonal emissions are intrazonal trips file, intrazonal area file, and intrazonal 

emissions factor file. These input files for the areas within the travel demand model area are for 

Franklin county, Licking county, Delaware county, as well as for partial areas of Fairfield county 

and Madison county. The intrazonal trips were extracted from the trip tables using a 

Cube/Voyager script. 

2.4 Emission Factor Generation

Base and Attainment Years 

Using MOVES, emission factor files were generated for base year-2002 and attainment year2006 to represent the programs being implemented in the region. Programs and corresponding 

MOVES parameters were developed in consultation with OEPA. 

Future Years 

Emission factors were also generated for three future year scenarios: 2012, 2020, and 2035. All 

assumptions are the same as those used to generate 2006 emission factors and are further 

illustrated in this section using year 2006 as an example. 

Technical Details 

Table 1 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES 

County-Data Manager. Further details in specific inputs that are not using default values are 

provided below. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 9 September, 2012 

Table 1 – MOVES Inputs 

RunSpec Parameter Settings

MOVES Version MOVES2010A 

Scale Custom Domain 

MOVES Modeling Technique Emission Factor Method 

Rates per Profile (grams/vehicle) 

Rates per Distance (grams/mile) 

Rates per Vehicle (grams/vehicle)

Time Span Time Aggregation: Hour 

1 Month representing average annual temperatures 

All hours of day selected 

16 speed bins 

Weekdays only 

Geographic Bounds Franklin, Delaware, Licking, Fairfield, Madison & Knox 

Counties. 

Vehicles/Equipment All source types, gasoline and diesel 

Road Type All road types including off-network 

Pollutants and Processes Total Gaseous Hydrocarbons, Non-Methane Hydrocarbons, 

Volitile Organic Compounds, NOx, NO, NO2, Total Energy 

Consumption 

Strategies None 

General Output Units = grams, joules and miles 

Output Emissions Time = hour, Location = custom area, on-road emission rates 

by road type and source use type. 

Advance Performance None 

County Data Manager Sources

Source Type Population Combination of local and default data 

Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration 

Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62 

Future year growth rate based on MPO model Household 

growth rate. 

Vehicle Type VMT Combination of local and default data 

HPMSVTypeYear VMT = daily VMT from travel demand 

model 

monthVMTFraction = default 

dayVMTFraction=default 

hourVMTFraction=local 

I/M Program None 

Fuel Formulation Default 

Fuel Supply Default 

Future runs modified for reformulated gas, RVP, etc. for summer 

analyses 

Metereology Data Local data obtained from NOAA National Climatic Data Center. 

Data consist of monthly high and low temperatures and daily 

relative humidity for 2002. 

Ramp Fraction Using the base year travel demand model for VHT fractions. 

Future fractions assumed constant 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 10 September, 2012 

Road Type Distribution Use ODOT county summary VMT categorized by federal 

functional classes 

Age Distribution Combination of local and default data. 

Local data (2010) ODOT from motor vehicle registration 

Default data used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62 

The same age distribution used for all analysis years 

Average Speed Distribution Default 

Alternative Fuel Type Default 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 11 September, 2012 

Temperature and Relative Humidity 

Temperatures used for the single season approach are representative of 12 months in 

2002 based on NOAA data from the National Climate Data Center website. Data for 

Port Columbus International Airport was used because it was the most complete 

compared to other airports in the non-attainment area. To get the correct format for 

MOVES, the data was entered into a spreadsheet provided by EPA which was designed 

to convert Mobile6 data to MOVES. An average annual hourly temperature and relative 

humidity distribution profile can be seen in Table 2. 

Table 2 – Temperature and Relative Humidity Data 

Hour 

Average 

Temperature 

Average 

Relative Humidity 

1 48.9 73.0 

2 47.8 75.0 

3 46.9 77.0 

4 46.2 80.0 

5 45.7 81.0 

6 45.1 81.0 

7 44.6 80.0 

8 45.0 77.0 

9 47.5 73.0 

10 51.5 67.0 

11 55.6 64.0 

12 59.1 61.0 

13 62.2 57.0 

14 63.9 56.0 

15 64.4 53.0 

16 64.6 53.0 

17 64.2 54.0 

18 63.0 55.0 

19 61.0 57.0 

20 58.4 63.0 

21 55.9 67.0 

22 53.6 70.0 

23 52.0 72.0 

24 50.4 75.0 

Ramp Fraction 

Ramp fractions were derived using the base year travel demand model VHT fractions. 

Ramp fractions can be seen in Table 3. Base year fractions were assumed to apply to 

future years. 

Table 3 – Ramp Fractions 

RoadTypeID Road Description Ramp Fraction 

2 Rural Restricted Access 0.02 

4 Urban Restricted Access 0.13 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 12 September, 2012 

Source Type Population 

Source type population is based on a combination of local and MOVES default data. 

Local data was provided by ODOT based on 2010 motor vehicle registration. Default 

data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. Future year growth rate is based 

on MPO model growth in cars which is an independent variable to the travel demand 

model. Table 4 shows source type population for the analyzed counties in 2006. 

Table 4 – Source Type Population for year 2006 

Source 

Type 

ID sourceTypeName 

Franklin

Delaware Licking Fairfield

Madison & 

Knox

11 MotorCycle 55,222 6,868 8,999 2,444 3,565

21 Passenger Car 878,901 97,120 128,334 35,905 43,829

31 Passenger Truck 383,900 44,774 58,759 16,550 31,914

32 Light Commercial Truck 11,553 1,348 1,768 498 1,280

41 Intercity Bus 294 66 83 23 66

42 Transit Bus 79 18 22 6 35

43 School Bus 1,582 357 446 126 405

51 Refuse truck 228 39 49 13 37

52 Single Unit Short-haul Truck 205 35 44 12 1,553

53 Single Unit Long-haul Truck 264 44 57 15 198

54 Motor Home 1,102 184 235 65 181

61 Comb Short-haul Truck 3,144 653 905 154 780

62 Comb Long-haul Truck 3,616 750 1,040 178 897

Vehicle Age Distribution 

Vehicle age distribution information was derived using Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle 

registration data for year 2010. The data was given to OEPA who supplied a VIN 

decoder that allowed ODOT to create correctly formatted MOVES inputs. MOVES 

default data is used for source types 41, 51, 54, 61, and 62. The registration data for 

most populous four counties were obtained in the non-attainment area and combined to 

create a regional vehicle age distribution file, see Table 5. This data is applied to all six 

counties in the region. The same age distribution will be used for all analysis years 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 13 September, 2012 

Table 5 – Vehicle Age Distribution 

Year 

ID 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

2006 11 0 0.0017 21 8 0.0599 31 16 0.0300

2006 11 1 0.0228 21 9 0.0580 31 17 0.0256

2006 11 2 0.0552 21 10 0.0634 31 18 0.0157

2006 11 3 0.0765 21 11 0.0615 31 19 0.0118

2006 11 4 0.0864 21 12 0.0562 31 20 0.0084

2006 11 5 0.0820 21 13 0.0527 31 21 0.0077

2006 11 6 0.0664 21 14 0.0460 31 22 0.0062

2006 11 7 0.0839 21 15 0.0465 31 23 0.0048

2006 11 8 0.0584 21 16 0.0383 31 24 0.0031

2006 11 9 0.0540 21 17 0.0318 31 25 0.0024

2006 11 10 0.0442 21 18 0.0269 31 26 0.0015

2006 11 11 0.0333 21 19 0.0209 31 27 0.0009

2006 11 12 0.0260 21 20 0.0162 31 28 0.0005

2006 11 13 0.0204 21 21 0.0127 31 29 0.0003

2006 11 14 0.0195 21 22 0.0092 31 30 0.0037

2006 11 15 0.0188 21 23 0.0069 32 0 0.0059

2006 11 16 0.0153 21 24 0.0057 32 1 0.0452

2006 11 17 0.0128 21 25 0.0042 32 2 0.1089

2006 11 18 0.0091 21 26 0.0031 32 3 0.0740

2006 11 19 0.0085 21 27 0.0017 32 4 0.0699

2006 11 20 0.0078 21 28 0.0011 32 5 0.0388

2006 11 21 0.0078 21 29 0.0010 32 6 0.0331

2006 11 22 0.0074 21 30 0.0321 32 7 0.0376

2006 11 23 0.0106 31 0 0.0071 32 8 0.0370

2006 11 24 0.0156 31 1 0.0277 32 9 0.0441

2006 11 25 0.0144 31 2 0.0494 32 10 0.0557

2006 11 26 0.0126 31 3 0.0584 32 11 0.0557

2006 11 27 0.0163 31 4 0.0676 32 12 0.0472

2006 11 28 0.0237 31 5 0.0828 32 13 0.0456

2006 11 29 0.0163 31 6 0.0800 32 14 0.0385

2006 11 30 0.0723 31 7 0.0727 32 15 0.0609

2006 21 0 0.0075 31 8 0.0752 32 16 0.0476

2006 21 1 0.0279 31 9 0.0613 32 17 0.0340

2006 21 2 0.0396 31 10 0.0647 32 18 0.0273

2006 21 3 0.0489 31 11 0.0622 32 19 0.0155

2006 21 4 0.0508 31 12 0.0515 32 20 0.0156

2006 21 5 0.0537 31 13 0.0433 32 21 0.0156

2006 21 6 0.0561 31 14 0.0373 32 22 0.0118

2006 21 7 0.0595 31 15 0.0362 32 23 0.0095
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 14 September, 2012 

Year 

ID 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

2006 32 24 0.0045 42 2 0.0592 43 11 0.0557

2006 32 25 0.0057 42 3 0.0592 43 12 0.0843

2006 32 26 0.0044 42 4 0.0592 43 13 0.0484

2006 32 27 0.0019 42 5 0.0395 43 14 0.0178

2006 32 28 0.0010 42 6 0.0724 43 15 0.0192

2006 32 29 0.0007 42 7 0.0461 43 16 0.0129

2006 32 30 0.0068 42 8 0.0592 43 17 0.0132

2006 41 0 0.0013 42 9 0.0855 43 18 0.0181

2006 41 1 0.0344 42 10 0.0592 43 19 0.0213

2006 41 2 0.0607 42 11 0.1316 43 20 0.0139

2006 41 3 0.0837 42 12 0.0395 43 21 0.0087

2006 41 4 0.1005 42 13 0.0329 43 22 0.0077

2006 41 5 0.0870 42 14 0.0263 43 23 0.0087

2006 41 6 0.0972 42 15 0.0395 43 24 0.0056

2006 41 7 0.0607 42 16 0.0461 43 25 0.0066

2006 41 8 0.0742 42 17 0.0132 43 26 0.0049

2006 41 9 0.0472 42 18 0.0197 43 27 0.0024

2006 41 10 0.0466 42 19 0.0197 43 28 0.0017

2006 41 11 0.0614 42 20 0.0000 43 29 0.0038

2006 41 12 0.0290 42 21 0.0132 43 30 0.0064

2006 41 13 0.0263 42 22 0.0066 51 0 0.0097

2006 41 14 0.0189 42 23 0.0132 51 1 0.0290

2006 41 15 0.0162 42 24 0.0000 51 2 0.0258

2006 41 16 0.0229 42 25 0.0329 51 3 0.0839

2006 41 17 0.0142 42 26 0.0000 51 4 0.0968

2006 41 18 0.0081 42 27 0.0129 51 5 0.0226

2006 41 19 0.0175 42 28 0.0000 51 6 0.0677

2006 41 20 0.0101 42 29 0.0000 51 7 0.0774

2006 41 21 0.0101 42 30 0.0000 51 8 0.0419

2006 41 22 0.0121 43 0 0.0561 51 9 0.0323

2006 41 23 0.0094 43 1 0.0411 51 10 0.0710

2006 41 24 0.0061 43 2 0.0491 51 11 0.0710

2006 41 25 0.0034 43 3 0.0655 51 12 0.0613

2006 41 26 0.0081 43 4 0.0564 51 13 0.0516

2006 41 27 0.0020 43 5 0.0516 51 14 0.0387

2006 41 28 0.0000 43 6 0.0627 51 15 0.0419

2006 41 29 0.0034 43 7 0.0537 51 16 0.0355

2006 41 30 0.0273 43 8 0.0666 51 17 0.0161

2006 42 0 0.0000 43 9 0.0603 51 18 0.0258

2006 42 1 0.0132 43 10 0.0756 51 19 0.0129
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 15 September, 2012 

Year 

ID 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

2006 51 20 0.0000 52 29 0.0032 54 7 0.0450

2006 51 21 0.0032 52 30 0.0484 54 8 0.0417

2006 51 22 0.0065 53 0 0.0097 54 9 0.0414

2006 51 23 0.0032 53 1 0.0290 54 10 0.0524

2006 51 24 0.0032 53 2 0.0258 54 11 0.0482

2006 51 25 0.0065 53 3 0.0839 54 12 0.0409

2006 51 26 0.0032 53 4 0.0968 54 13 0.0334

2006 51 27 0.0000 53 5 0.0226 54 14 0.0356

2006 51 28 0.0097 53 6 0.0677 54 15 0.0315

2006 51 29 0.0032 53 7 0.0774 54 16 0.0285

2006 51 30 0.0484 53 8 0.0419 54 17 0.0254

2006 52 0 0.0097 53 9 0.0323 54 18 0.0197

2006 52 1 0.0290 53 10 0.0710 54 19 0.0177

2006 52 2 0.0258 53 11 0.0710 54 20 0.0180

2006 52 3 0.0839 53 12 0.0613 54 21 0.0263

2006 52 4 0.0968 53 13 0.0516 54 22 0.0243

2006 52 5 0.0226 53 14 0.0387 54 23 0.0230

2006 52 6 0.0677 53 15 0.0419 54 24 0.0166

2006 52 7 0.0774 53 16 0.0355 54 25 0.0193

2006 52 8 0.0419 53 17 0.0161 54 26 0.0208

2006 52 9 0.0323 53 18 0.0258 54 27 0.0130

2006 52 10 0.0710 53 19 0.0129 54 28 0.0089

2006 52 11 0.0710 53 20 0.0000 54 29 0.0074

2006 52 12 0.0613 53 21 0.0032 54 30 0.1404

2006 52 13 0.0516 53 22 0.0065 61 0 0.0021

2006 52 14 0.0387 53 23 0.0032 61 1 0.0135

2006 52 15 0.0419 53 24 0.0032 61 2 0.0306

2006 52 16 0.0355 53 25 0.0065 61 3 0.0385

2006 52 17 0.0161 53 26 0.0032 61 4 0.0509

2006 52 18 0.0258 53 27 0.0000 61 5 0.0527

2006 52 19 0.0129 53 28 0.0097 61 6 0.0590

2006 52 20 0.0000 53 29 0.0032 61 7 0.0584

2006 52 21 0.0032 53 30 0.0484 61 8 0.0571

2006 52 22 0.0065 54 0 0.0051 61 9 0.0551

2006 52 23 0.0032 54 1 0.0130 61 10 0.0628

2006 52 24 0.0032 54 2 0.0257 61 11 0.0608

2006 52 25 0.0065 54 3 0.0382 61 12 0.0501

2006 52 26 0.0032 54 4 0.0413 61 13 0.0542

2006 52 27 0.0000 54 5 0.0472 61 14 0.0390

2006 52 28 0.0097 54 6 0.0501 61 15 0.0435
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 16 September, 2012 

Year 

ID 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

Source 

Type ID 

Age 

ID 

Age 

Fraction 

2006 61 16 0.0430 62 1 0.0485 62 17 0.0079

2006 61 17 0.0314 62 2 0.0193 62 18 0.0039

2006 61 18 0.0269 62 3 0.1651 62 19 0.0026

2006 61 19 0.0228 62 4 0.0912 62 20 0.0032

2006 61 20 0.0192 62 5 0.1263 62 21 0.0034

2006 61 21 0.0217 62 6 0.0858 62 22 0.0027

2006 61 22 0.0203 62 7 0.0529 62 23 0.0013

2006 61 23 0.0144 62 8 0.0286 62 24 0.0008

2006 61 24 0.0135 62 9 0.0663 62 25 0.0008

2006 61 25 0.0099 62 10 0.1102 62 26 0.0006

2006 61 26 0.0069 62 11 0.0600 62 27 0.0002

2006 61 27 0.0036 62 12 0.0353 62 28 0.0001

2006 61 28 0.0032 62 13 0.0186 62 29 0.0003

2006 61 29 0.0028 62 14 0.0196 62 30 0.0001

2006 61 30 0.0321 62 15 0.0208

2006 62 0 0.0076 62 16 0.0160

2006

 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 17 September, 2012 

Road Type Distribution 

Road type distribution is based on the 2008 ODOT, county summary, HPMS VMT data 

categorized by federal functional class obtained for the most populous four counties, 

and is applied to the region, similar to development of vehicle age distribution data used 

for the region. Road type distribution can be seen in Table 6.

Table 6 – Road Type Distribution 

Source 

Type ID 

Road 

Type ID 

Road Type VMT 

Fraction 

Source Type 

ID 

Road 

Type ID 

Road Type VMT 

Fraction 

11 1 0 43 4 0.37

11 2 0.05 43 5 0.46

11 3 0.12 51 1 0

11 4 0.37 51 2 0.05

11 5 0.46 51 3 0.12

21 1 0 51 4 0.37

21 2 0.05 51 5 0.46

21 3 0.12 52 1 0

21 4 0.37 52 2 0.05

21 5 0.46 52 3 0.12

31 1 0 52 4 0.37

31 2 0.05 52 5 0.46

31 3 0.12 53 1 0

31 4 0.37 53 2 0.05

31 5 0.46 53 3 0.12

32 1 0 53 4 0.37

32 2 0.05 53 5 0.46

32 3 0.12 54 1 0

32 4 0.37 54 2 0.05

32 5 0.46 54 3 0.12

41 1 0 54 4 0.37

41 2 0.05 54 5 0.46

41 3 0.12 61 1 0

41 4 0.37 61 2 0.05

41 5 0.46 61 3 0.12

42 1 0 61 4 0.37

42 2 0.05 61 5 0.46

42 3 0.12 62 1 0

42 4 0.37 62 2 0.05

42 5 0.46 62 3 0.12

43 1 0 62 4 0.37

43 2 0.05 62 5 0.46

43 3 0.12
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 18 September, 2012 

Vehicle Type VMT and VMT Fractions

The first component of the VMT inputs is the Yearly HPMS VMT, but the travel demand 

model was used instead of ODOT’s HMPS data since it was felt that the model would 

better predict future year VMT. ODOT’s CMS post-processor was run for each year to 

generate congestion reports, which includes total daily VMT. The vehicle type 

percentages of the total VMT were based on ODOT’s weigh-in-motion (WIM) data. 

Since there are not enough WIM stations for lower class facilities in the non-attainment 

area, a statewide average of all ODOT WIM data collectors was used. Daily VMT was 

then converted to yearly. Yearly HPMS VMT for 2006 can be seen in Table 7. The 

same method was used to generate all other analysis years 

Table 7 – Yearly HPMS VMT for 2006 

HPMS 

VtypeID Year ID HPMS BaseYear VMT

10 2006 65,724,689

20 2006 11,721,479,841

30 2006 3,616,636,813

40 2006 36,966,843

50 2006 273,279,798

60 2006 648,816,441

Monthly and daily VMT fractions used MOVES default data. The hourly VMT fractions 

were derived from ODOT WIM data. Hourly VMT fractions vary for each of the five 

MOVES road types but do not change for each of the 16 MOVES source types. A 

representative sample of the hour VMT fraction input file can be seen in Table 8, the 

entire file is too large to include in this document. 

Table 8 – Hourly VMT Fractions 

Source 

TypeID 

Road 

TypeID DayID HourID 

Hour 

VMTFraction 

11 1 2 1 0.0089

11 1 2 2 0.00564

11 1 2 3 0.00424

11 1 2 4 0.00427

11 1 2 5 0.00695

11 1 2 6 0.01798

11 1 2 7 0.03806

11 1 2 8 0.057

11 1 2 9 0.05773

11 1 2 10 0.05538
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 19 September, 2012 

Source 

TypeID 

Road 

TypeID DayID HourID 

Hour 

VMTFraction 

11 1 2 11 0.05554

11 1 2 12 0.05558

11 1 2 13 0.05584

11 1 2 14 0.06051

11 1 2 15 0.06765

11 1 2 16 0.07755

11 1 2 17 0.08428

11 1 2 18 0.0797

11 1 2 19 0.06012

11 1 2 20 0.04522

11 1 2 21 0.03646

11 1 2 22 0.02912

11 1 2 23 0.02142

11 1 2 24 0.01486

11 2 2 1 0.0089

11 2 2 2 0.00564

11 2 2 3 0.00424

11 2 2 4 0.00427

11 2 2 5 0.00695

11 2 2 6 0.01798

11 2 2 7 0.03806

11 2 2 8 0.057

11 2 2 9 0.05773

11 2 2 10 0.05538

11 2 2 11 0.05554

11 2 2 12 0.05558

11 2 2 13 0.05584

11 2 2 14 0.06051

11 2 2 15 0.06765

11 2 2 16 0.07755

11 2 2 17 0.08428

11 2 2 18 0.0797

11 2 2 19 0.06012

11 2 2 20 0.04522

11 2 2 21 0.03646

11 2 2 22 0.02912

11 2 2 23 0.02142

11 2 2 24 0.01486
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 20 September, 2012 

Source 

TypeID 

Road 

TypeID DayID HourID 

Hour 

VMTFraction 

11 3 2 1 0.00655

11 3 2 2 0.0037

11 3 2 3 0.00304

11 3 2 4 0.00363

11 3 2 5 0.00792

11 3 2 6 0.02343

11 3 2 7 0.04899

11 3 2 8 0.06319

11 3 2 9 0.05402

11 3 2 10 0.05121

11 3 2 11 0.0528

11 3 2 12 0.05608

11 3 2 13 0.05814

11 3 2 14 0.05875

11 3 2 15 0.06676

11 3 2 16 0.07812

11 3 2 17 0.08469

11 3 2 18 0.08152

11 3 2 19 0.05852

11 3 2 20 0.04343

11 3 2 21 0.03606

11 3 2 22 0.02829

11 3 2 23 0.01883

11 3 2 24 0.01233

11 4 2 1 0.00752

11 4 2 2 0.0044

11 4 2 3 0.00354

11 4 2 4 0.00374

11 4 2 5 0.00705

11 4 2 6 0.02123

11 4 2 7 0.054

11 4 2 8 0.0768

11 4 2 9 0.06545

11 4 2 10 0.05114

11 4 2 11 0.04692

11 4 2 12 0.04916

11 4 2 13 0.05112

11 4 2 14 0.0534

11 4 2 15 0.06105
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 21 September, 2012 

Source 

TypeID 

Road 

TypeID DayID HourID 

Hour 

VMTFraction 

11 4 2 16 0.07421

11 4 2 17 0.08321

11 4 2 18 0.08385

11 4 2 19 0.06062

11 4 2 20 0.04229

11 4 2 21 0.03442

11 4 2 22 0.0292

11 4 2 23 0.02137

11 4 2 24 0.01431

11 5 2 1 0.00678

11 5 2 2 0.00378

11 5 2 3 0.00295

11 5 2 4 0.0029

11 5 2 5 0.00498

11 5 2 6 0.01422

11 5 2 7 0.03449

11 5 2 8 0.05728

11 5 2 9 0.05435

11 5 2 10 0.04991

11 5 2 11 0.05261

11 5 2 12 0.06098

11 5 2 13 0.06457

11 5 2 14 0.06387

11 5 2 15 0.06812

11 5 2 16 0.07672

11 5 2 17 0.08274

11 5 2 18 0.08284

11 5 2 19 0.06344

11 5 2 20 0.04866

11 5 2 21 0.0407

11 5 2 22 0.03083

11 5 2 23 0.01966

11 5 2 24 0.01262
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 22 September, 2012 

Output Emission Factors 

Table 9 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per distance) emission 

file for year 2006. For any given month, day of week, hour of the day, pollutant, and 

process; the rate per distance varies by road type, and speed bin. Rates per distance 

emissions are applied to link and intrazonal VMT. 

Table 9 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Distance) for year 2006 

Heading: MOVESScenarioID MOVESRunID yearID monthID dayID hourID 

Record: OhioCustomDomain 6 2006 7 5 1

Heading: linkID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID SCC fuelTypeID 

Record: 990250201 3 1 1 0

Heading: modelYearID roadTypeID avgSpeedBinID temperature relHumidity ratePerDistance

Record: 0 2 1 48.9333 73 15.1949

Table 10 shows the first record in a MOVES sample output (rate per vehicle) emission 

file for year 2006. The rate per vehicle varies for any combinations of month, day of 

week, hour of the day, pollutant, and process. Rates per vehicle emissions are applied 

to the vehicle source type population. 

Table 10 – Sample Emission File (Rate per Vehicle) for year 2006 

Heading: MOVESScenarioID 

MOVESRunI

D yearID monthID dayID 

Record: OhioCustomDomain 6 2006 7 5

Heading: hourID zoneID pollutantID processID sourceTypeID 

Record: 1 990250 3 0 2

Heading: SCC fuelTypeID 

modelYearI

D 

temperatur

e 

ratePerVehicl

e 

Record: 0 0 48.9333 0.060425

 Air Quality Consultation Process

The 1990 Clean Air Act amendments required identification of the consultation 

procedures that Ohio's air quality and transportation agencies will follow in the 

conformity process. To fulfill this requirement, the Ohio EPA has adopted Ohio 

Administrative Code 3745-101-04 to define the interagency consultation procedures 

used on air quality issues. These rules define a "straw man" process, whereby the lead 

agencies in the conformity process assume responsibility for preparing and distributing 

draft documents, with supporting information, and ensuring that each affected party 

involved in the conformity process is included in the consultation process. In addition, a 

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between MORPC, LCATS, ODOT and Ohio 

EPA has been signed to clarify OAC 3745-101-04 for the Columbus maintenance area. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 23 September, 2012 

As a result of SAFETEA-LU Ohio EPA led the process to update MOU. This process is 

concluding with signatures from all parties obtained in February/March 2008. 

The Columbus non-attainment area SIP development process employed the 

consultation procedures embodied in the rules. The procedures used in the current air 

quality analysis are comparable to the previous on road emission inventory and 

forecasting process. In addition, MORPC has had various telephone conversations and 

e-mail correspondence with Ohio EPA, ODOT and FHWA. Ohio EPA has also 

discussed various issues with U.S. EPA. 

2.4.1 Vehicle Age Distribution

OEPA provided vehicle age distribution information that was derived using USEPAs VIN 

decoder and Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicle registration data. The registration data for 

Central Ohio area, Vehicle age distribution used to represent the MORPC/LCATS area 

is listed in Table 5. 

2.4.2 Temperatures

The low and high input temperatures used for MORPC area was given by OEPA. 

ODOT developed an average daily temperature distribution profile to derive the hourly 

temperature values. Temperature data input used is shown in table 2. 

2.5 Computations Methodology

2.5.1 Areas with Regional Model

Post Processing

Custom programs developed by ODOT in conjunction with MPO models, were used in 

computing total emissions. The process uses data on daily and directional traffic 

distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the 2000 Highway 

Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below, uses rewritten code able to 

handle the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission factors. 

The first step in the process involves running postcms10.exe to calculate hourly link 

volumes based on the percentage of the daily volume (travel demand model output) 

determined by a link’s facility and area type. Link speeds from the travel demand model 

are not used in the analysis. The speeds are estimated as a post-process to the model 

based on HCM methods using a link’s volume-to-capacity ratio and link group code. 

The daily to hourly volume conversion percentages and speed tables can be seen in 

Appendix A, model script.
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 24 September, 2012 

The second step (movesnet.exe) uses a combination of the MOVES emission factors 

and the hourly link volumes that are output of the postcms10.exe program. The hourly 

volumes are multiplied by the MOVES emission factor for the corresponding hour of 

day, speed bin, and roadtype to calculate emissions for every network link for each 

hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all individual 

link-hour emissions. 

The third step, (movesveh.exe), calculates vehicle-based emissions for each source 

type for each hour of the day. The vehicle source type is based on a combination of 

local and default data. The final vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all 

individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types. 

Intrazonal trips do not get loaded onto the network, so the fourth step in the process 

requires a separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel 

within a zone. The intracalc2.exe program uses intrazonal trips to estimate VMT using 

the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each zone. The zone is assumed 

circular and the radius of the circle is used as the average trip length for these 

intrazonal trips. Intrazonal emissions are then calculated by combining MOVES 

generated emissions with estimated intrazonal VMT. The emission rates are the same 

as those used to calculated link based emissions. 

The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, 

pollutant, and analyzed year, and to multiply annual average daily emissions by 365 to 

produce an annual estimate. Daily summary emissions for each pollutant, county, and 

scenario year in the Central Ohio Region can be found in Appendix B through G. A 

summary of these emissions are tabulated in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 

2.5.2 Areas without Regional Model

The travel demand forecasting model discussed in the preceding sections does not 

cover the entire non-attainment area. Therefore, a standard process based on HPMS 

VMT was employed for the rest of the area which includes portions of Fairfield County, 

Madison County, and Knox County. This process first requires estimating the 

proportion of county VMT covered by the model and not covered by the model. This 

was accomplished using a GIS procedure, whereby, the proportion of the number of 

vehicles from census data, inside and outside of the model boundary, was calculated. 

This information was then combined with countywide average volumes by functional 

class to obtain the proportion of VMT inside and outside of the model. This computation 

yields 47% of the Fairfield county VMT, being inside the model area. Thus 53% of the 

HPMS VMT is used as the basis of the off-model computation for Fairfield County. For 

Madison County 71% HPMS VMT is used as the basis of the off-model computation of 

emissions. HPMS VMT data is used for all of Knox County. To obtain forecast year 

emissions, the base year VMT is projected forward based on a series of standard 

growth rates as shown in the “HPMS Growth Rates Methodology” based on VMT 

forecasting procedures developed by ODOT. These growth rates are updated every 5 

years using the latest count trends. 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 25 September, 2012 

Correctly applying the VMT growth rates is not as straight forward as multiplying the % 

per year growth by most current year and the number of years. The growth rate is 

derived for use as a linear growth rate, constant slope. To make the forecast using the 

same slope, the percentage growth must first be applied to the most current HPMS 

VMT data for year 2009 to convert the percentage into a growth rate (VMT/year) which 

is the slope of the line. 

VMT by functional classification obtained for outside regional model area, also provides 

speed data based on the type of facility. MOVES generated factors of rate per distance 

as well as rate per vehicle were used to generate emissions for VOC, and NOx. A 

summary of these emissions are tabulated in Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 26 September, 2012 

3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

Emission estimates summary of results is presented in the next sections. 

3.1.1 Areas within The Regional Travel Demand Model

Table 11: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Franklin County 

Franklin County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 30,473,707 33,989,641 34,609,039 37,688,274 43,564,874

VOC (tons/day) 144.874 112.929 61.455 31.880 26.481 

NOx (tons/day) 224.335 194.950 118.111 59.958 47.672 

Table 12: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Delaware County 

Delaware County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 4,482,756 5,001,802 5,811,519 7,141,185 9,712,948 

VOC (tons/day) 13.094 9.993 6.312 3.780 3.778 

NOx (tons/day) 24.622 21.071 14.625 8.488 8.074 

Table 13: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources - Licking County 

Licking County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 5,399,830 5,409,966 5,613,225 6,557,551 8,284,431 

VOC (tons/day) 18.080 13.286 6.991 4.021 3.789 

NOx (tons/day) 32.134 25.920 15.341 8.557 7.648 

3.1.2 Areas partially within The Regional Travel Demand Model

Counties that are partially within regional travel demand model are Fairfield county, and 

Madison county. 

Tables 14a, and 14b, summarize emissions estimates for Fairfield county, for the areas within 

and outside travel demand model area, respectively. Results presented in Table 14a is for the 

area covered by the travel demand model. Table 14b is for the area not covered by the travel 

demand model. These are derived by using 53% of the total county HPMS based VMT as 

described in section 2.5.2. Table 14c presents the emissions for the entire Fairfield county, 

which is simply sum of emissions from Tables 14a, and 14b. 

Table 14a: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County within the Travel Demand Model 

Area 

Fairfield County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 1,481,594 1,845,407 1,910,822 2,312,642 3,090,499 

VOC (tons/day) 3.266 3.291 1.961 1.174 1.180 

NOx (tons/day) 6.920 7.287 4.633 2.678 2.551 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 27 September, 2012 

Table 14b: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County outside of the Travel Demand 

Model Area- using HPMS data 

Fairfield County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 1,531,253 1,664,495 1,781,497 1,979,083 2,361,780 

VOC (tons/day) 2.754 2.411 1.536 0.896 0.817 

NOx (tons/day) 6.108 5.393 3.490 1.974 1.765 

Table 14c: Emission Estimations for Fairfield County 

 sum of emissions from both the Travel Demand Model area as well as the HPMS area 

Tables 15a, and 15b, summarize emissions estimates for Madison county, for the areas within 

and outside travel demand area, respectively. Results presented in Table 15a is for the area 

covered by the travel demand model. Table 15b is for the area not covered by the travel 

demand model. These are derived by using 71% of the Madison county HPMS based VMT as 

described in section 2.5.2. Table 15c presents the emissions for the entire Madison county, 

which is simply sum of emissions from Tables 15a, and 15b. 

Table 15a: Emission Estimations for Madison County within the Travel Demand Model 

Area 

Table 15b: Emission Estimations for Madison County outside of the Travel Demand 

Model Area - using HPMS data 

Fairfield County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 3,012,847 3,509,902 3,692,318 4,291,725 5,452,279 

VOC (tons/day) 6.019 5.702 3.497 2.070 1.997 

NOx (tons/day) 13.028 12.679 8.123 4.652 4.316 

Madison County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 982,179 903,123 968,070 1,152,531 1,515,536 

VOC (tons/day) 3.063 1.609 0.951 0.557 0.545 

NOx (tons/day) 5.686 3.565 2.299 1.298 1.203 

Madison County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 1,391,325 1,512,392 1,618,701 1,798,232 2,145,958 

VOC (tons/day) 2.502 2.191 1.396 0.814 0.742 

NOx (tons/day) 5.550 4.900 3.171 1.793 1.603 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 28 September, 2012 

Table 15c: Emission Estimations for Madison County 

sum of emissions from both the Travel Demand Model area as well as the HPMS area 

3.1.3 Area outside Regional Travel Demand Model

Tables 16, summarizes emissions estimates for Knox county, and the results presented in this 

Table used methodology based on HPMS data. 

Table 16: Emission Estimations for Knox County – using only HPMS 

3.1.4 Total Emissions for the Columbus/Central Ohio area

Table 17, summarizes emissions estimates for the entire six county area. These emissions 

presented here is simply sum of all emissions in six counties summarized in Tables 11 through 

16. 

Table 17: Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources for Columbus/Central Ohio 

Madison County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 2,373,505 2,415,515 2,586,771 2,950,763 3,661,494 

VOC (tons/day) 5.565 3.800 2.347 1.371 1.288 

NOx (tons/day) 11.236 8.465 5.470 3.092 2.807 

Knox County 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 1,117,218 1,214,433 1,299,798 1,443,959 1,723,179 

VOC (tons/day) 2.009 1.759 1.121 0.654 0.596 

NOx (tons/day) 4.456 3.935 2.546 1.440 1.288 

Central Ohio Area 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VMT (miles/day) 46,859,862 51,541,259 53,612,671 60,073,457 72,399,205 

VOC (tons/day) 189.642 147.469 81.723 43.776 37.928 

NOx (tons/day) 309.811 267.020 164.216 86.186 71.803 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 29 September, 2012 

3.2 Emissions Summary for the Columbus/Central Ohio Area

Tables 18 and 19, summarize VOC and NOx emissions estimates respectively for the analysis 

years. The summary presented in the following tables is from the aforementioned in Tables 11 

through 16. 

Table 18: VOC Emission Inventory Summary 

- Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006, and Projected 2012, 2020, and 2030 (tons/day) 

 

 2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

VOC Base Year Attainment Interim Year Maintenance Horizon Year 

Franklin 144.874 112.929 61.455 31.880 26.481

Delaware 13.094 9.993 6.312 3.780 3.778

Licking 18.080 13.286 6.991 4.021 3.789

Fairfield 6.019 5.702 3.497 2.070 1.997

Madison 5.565 3.800 2.347 1.371 1.288

Knox 2.009 1.759 1.121 0.654 0.596

Total 189.642 147.469 81.723 43.776 37.928

Table 19: NOx Emission Inventory Summary 

- Base Year 2002, Estimated 2006 and Projected 2012, 2020, and 2030 (tons/per day) 

 

2002 2006 2012 2020 2035 

NOx Base Year Attainment Interim Year Maintenance Horizon Year 

Franklin 224.335 194.950 118.111 59.958 47.672

Delaware 24.622 21.071 14.625 8.488 8.074

Licking 32.134 25.920 15.341 8.557 7.648

Fairfield 13.028 12.679 8.123 4.652 4.316

Madison 11.236 8.465 5.470 3.092 2.807

Knox 4.456 3.935 2.546 1.440 1.288

Total 309.811 267.020 164.216 86.186 71.803
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 30 September, 2012 

APPENDIX 

• Appendix A –Model Script for computing emissions 

• Appendix B – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2002 

• Appendix C – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2006 

• Appendix D – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2012 

• Appendix E – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2020 

• Appendix F – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2035 

• Appendix G – MORPC HPMS VMT and Emissions 

• Appendix H – Interagency Consultation 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 31 September, 2012 

Appendix A – Model Script, Figures illustrating Data

CUBE VOYAGER PROGRAM SCRIPT FOR COMPUTING VOC & NOx EMISSIONS 

;[CMS (AQ), Produce Viper Network Output];;<<Process Template>>;;;Input Network File: {cm3neti,filename,"Input Network File 

Name",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\AQ_asgn_2006.net","Network File (*.;Output Network File: {cm3neto,filename,"Output Network File Name",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\AQ_2006out.net","Network File (*.ne;Output CSV Summary File: {cm3sumo,filename,"Output CSV Summary File",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\fra06.csv","Report File (*.csv;*.tx;Output TXT Report File: {cm3rpto,filename,"Output TXT Report File",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\fra06.rpt","Report File (*.rpt;*.tx;Output CSV Hourly File: {cm3hro,filename,"Output CSV Hourly File (Needed for benefits calc big)",x,"NONE","Report File (*.csv;*.txt)|*.csv;*.txt"};Note: {cm3junkname,note,"Optional Air Quality Files, Leave Blank When Not Doing Air Qualit;AQ Run Type: {cm3aqtype,combolist,"AQ Run Type","MOVES","NONE","MOBILE"}

;AQ Comment Line: {cm3aqcom,editbox,"Optional AQ Report Comment",T,"Ozone Analysis with MOV

;Input Network Emissions Factors: {cm3effile,filename,"Input Network (per distance)EmissionFactors",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv","Emissio(*.fac;*.csv)|*.fac;*.csv"};Input Vehicle (MOV) or Intrazonal (MOB) Emissions Factors: {cm3ieffile,filename,"Input VehIntrazonal (MOB) Emissions Factors",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv","Emissio*.csv)|*.crd; *.csv"};Input area file: {cm3afile,filename,"Input Area File",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt","Text File (*.txt; *.prn;Input Intrazonal Trips File: {cm3ifile,filename,"Input Intrazonal Trips (Matrix must be OMtext)",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA06.txt","Matrix or Text File (*.mat; *.trp)|*.txt; *.prn; *.mat; *.trp"};Intrazonal File Type: {cm3iztype,combolist,"Intrazonal File Type","TEXT","NONE","OMSTABLE";Input vehicle file: {cm3vfile,filename,"Input Vehicle File (Moves Only)",x,"N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2006_MORPC_on-Model.csv","T(*.csv)|*.csv"};Space: {cm3space,note,"Parameters"};Truck PCE: {cm3tpce,editbox,"Truck PCE",N,"2.0"};Capacity Field: {cm3capf,comboedit,"Capacity Field","CAP24","CAP1","CAP2","CAP3","CAP4"};Hourly/Model Capacity Factor: {cm3kfact,editbox,"Hourly/Model(usually daily) Capacity Fact;AQ Season Factor: {cm3aqfact,comboedit,"AQ Season Factor (Ozone Only)","1.08","1.00"}
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 32 September, 2012 

;Set Priority Code from ADMCLASS?:{cm3pri,combolist,"Set Priority Code from ADMCLASS? (CMSC

use)","NO","SW","OMS"} ;Run Mode: {cm3rmode,combolist,"Run Mode (usually use Normal for AQ)","NORMAL","4PERIOD_OMS","4PERIOD_SW","4PERIOD_MARKETSEGMENTS_SW"};Note: {cm3junkname2,note,"Normal Mode Inputs (if you specify another mode the fields are p;Volume Field: {cm3volf,comboedit,"Volume Field", "VOL24_TOT","V_1", "LOADEDVOL","WINTERVOL;Truck Volume Field: {cm3trkf,comboedit,"Truck Volume Field (leave to NONE for AQ unless EFsource)", "NONE","VOL24_TRK","VOL24_TRKHV","V2_1"};;<<End Parameters>>;;*if exist tempcms.txt DEL tempcms.txt 

*if exist summary.rpt DEL summary.rpt *if exist hourly.rpt DEL hourly.rpt *if exist cmstext.rpt DEL cmstext.rpt COPY FILE=county.dat ADA 1 4 ALL 2 3 ASD 3 4 ATB 4 4 ATH 5 4 AUG 6 4 BEL 7 3 BRO 8 4 BUT 9 2 CAR10 4 CHP11 4 CLA12 3 CLE13 2 CLI14 4 COL15 4 COS16 4 CRA17 4 CUY18 1 DAR19 4 DEF20 4 DEL21 2 ERI22 3 FAI23 4 FAY24 4 FRA25 1 FUL26 4 GAL27 4 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 33 September, 2012 

GEA28 2 GRE29 2 GUE30 4 HAM31 1 HAN32 4 HAR33 4 HAS34 4 HEN35 4 HIG36 4 HOC37 4 HOL38 4 HUR39 4 JAC40 4 JEF41 3 KNO42 4 LAK43 2 LAW44 3 LIC45 3 LOG46 4 LOR47 2 LUC48 2 MAD49 4 MAH50 2 MAR51 4 MED52 2 MEG53 4 MER54 4 MIA55 2 MOE56 4 MOT57 2 MRG58 4 MRW59 4 MUS60 4 NOB61 4 OTT62 4 PAU63 4 PER64 4 PIC65 4 PIK66 4 POR67 2 PRE68 4 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 34 September, 2012 

PUT69 4 RIC70 3 ROS71 4 SAN72 4 SCI73 4 SEN74 4 SHE75 4 STA76 2 SUM77 2 TRU78 2 TUS79 4 UNI80 4 VAN81 4 VIN82 4 WAR83 2 WAS84 3 WAY85 4 WIL86 4 WOO87 2 WYA88 4 ENDCOPY COPY FILE=dailya.dat HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 5.3 5.5 6.1 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 6.5 6.4 6.8 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.5 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 6.0 6.0 6.7 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3 PCTADT TRK URB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.4 6.4 6.3 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.4 7.2 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 35 September, 2012 

RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 PCTDIR URB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 52 52 50 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40 URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 50 50 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46 RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 50 52 52 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44 RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 50 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44 LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 7.5 8.125 8.75 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375 SPEEDVC curve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 70.5 67.8 64.2 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 67.1 65.1 62.2 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 63.8 62.6 60.5 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.1 58.2 56.7 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.7 54.3 53.6 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.1 58.5 57.7 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.2 53.8 53.1 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.4 49 48.5 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.4 44.1 43.6 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 45.1 43.5 41.7 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 42.5 39.6 36.2 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 41.4 37.5 32.9 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 36.7 35.3 33.5 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 1
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 36 September, 2012 

curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 34.3 32.1 29.4 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 32.3 29.5 26.4 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 28.5 26.1 23.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 28.3 25.8 23.1 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 26.3 23.4 20.4 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 23.7 21.5 19.1 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 23.4 21.1 18.6 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 22.1 19.6 17 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED LOS DETERMINATION) (ALL USE THE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)  BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00 B 0.30 0.00 0.25 C 0.50 0.10 0.40 D 0.70 0.30 0.60 E 0.90 0.50 0.80 F 1.00 1.00 1.00 F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10 F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30 SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED) FFS B C D E F >47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16. >37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13. >32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10. <33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREA NUM LOS DEFINITION 1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM) 2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 13 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 37 September, 2012 

4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING) MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30 MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30 MAX ITERATIONS : 1000 TRUCK PCE: {cm3tpce} AQ SEASON FACTOR: {cm3aqfact} ENDCOPY rrmode='{cm3rmode}' if(rrmode='NORMAL') COPY FILE=dailyb.dat MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE COR NOT(0)) CLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENDCOPY  volff='li.1.{cm3volf}'  trkfff='{cm3trkf}'  if (trkfff == 'NONE') then  trkff='_zero'  else  trkff='li.1.{cm3trkf}'  endif  vol1s='_zero'  vol2s='_zero'  vol3s='_zero'  vol4s='_zero'  vol5s='_zero'  vol6s='_zero'  vol7s='_zero' 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 38 September, 2012 

 vol8s='_zero'  vol9s='_zero'  vol10s='_zero'  vol11s='_zero'  vol12s='_zero'  vol13s='_zero'  vol14s='_zero'  vol15s='_zero'  vol16s='_zero' elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_OMS') COPY FILE=dailyb.dat MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE COR NOT(0)) CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 18 6 9 14 18 6 9 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 5 8 13 17 5 8 13 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENDCOPY  volff='_zero'  trkff='_zero'  vol1s='li.1.volnt_aut'  vol2s='li.1.volam_aut'  vol3s='li.1.volmd_aut'  vol4s='li.1.volpm_aut'  vol5s='li.1.volnt_trk'  vol6s='li.1.volam_trk'  vol7s='li.1.volmd_trk'  vol8s='li.1.volpm_trk'  vol9s='_zero'  vol10s='_zero'  vol11s='_zero'  vol12s='_zero'  vol13s='_zero'  vol14s='_zero'  vol15s='_zero'  vol16s='_zero' 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 39 September, 2012 

elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_SW') COPY FILE=dailyb.dat MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE COR NOT(0)) CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENDCOPY  volff='_zero'  trkff='_zero'  vol1s='li.1.evvol_aut'  vol2s='li.1.amvol_aut'  vol3s='li.1.mdvol_aut'  vol4s='li.1.pmvol_aut'  vol5s='li.1.evvol_trk'  vol6s='li.1.amvol_trk'  vol7s='li.1.mdvol_trk'  vol8s='li.1.pmvol_trk'  vol9s='_zero'  vol10s='_zero'  vol11s='_zero'  vol12s='_zero'  vol13s='_zero'  vol14s='_zero'  vol15s='_zero'  vol16s='_zero' elseif(rrmode='4PERIOD_MARKETSEGMENTS_SW') COPY FILE=dailyb.dat MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE COR NOT(0)) CLS TRK 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 19 7 10 16 19 7 10 16 19 7 19 7 10 16 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 40 September, 2012 

CLS END 6 9 15 18 6 9 15 18 6 9 6 9 15 18 CLS NUM 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 4 4 4 4 ENDCOPY  volff='_zero'  trkff='_zero'  vol1s='li.1.evvol_autwk'  vol2s='li.1.amvol_autwk'  vol3s='li.1.mdvol_autwk'  vol4s='li.1.pmvol_autwk'  vol5s='li.1.evvol_trkhv'  vol6s='li.1.amvol_trkhv'  vol7s='li.1.mdvol_trkhv'  vol8s='li.1.pmvol_trkhv'  vol9s='li.1.evvol_autnw'  vol10s='li.1.amvol_autnw'  vol11s='li.1.mdvol_autnw'  vol12s='li.1.pmvol_autnw'  vol13s='li.1.evvol_trklt'  vol14s='li.1.amvol_trklt'  vol15s='li.1.mdvol_trklt'  vol16s='li.1.pmvol_trklt' endif *if exist daily.dat del daily.dat *copy dailya.dat+dailyb.dat daily.dat *del dailya.dat *del dailyb.dat RUN PGM=NETWORK

 NETI={cm3neti.q} 

 LINKO=templnk.txt, format = TXT, include = a(6),b(6),junk1(1),junk1(4),junks(1),moffpspd( ctoll(4),junkb(1),lanes(1),twidth(2),junkb(1),terrain(1),junk1(1),junkb(1),  cap(6),vol(6),loneway(1),boffpspd(4),ttoll(4),junkb(1),blanes(1),areatype(1),admcl junkb(1),bterrain(1),junk1(1),junkb(1),bcap(6),bvol(6),medturn(1),pcttrk(2),junk1( funclass(2),lnkgrp(2),mpostspd(2),jurisdic(1),county(3),rtenumb(5),junk1(7),nhs(1) fedfunc(2),trkvol(5),junkp(1),junk1(30),junk1(30),junk1(30),junk1(21),mdist(6),  vol1(6),vol2(6),vol3(6),vol4(6),vol5(6),vol6(6),vol7(6),vol8(6),vol9(6),vol10(6),v vol12(6),vol13(6),vol14(6),vol15(6),vol16(6)  NODEO=tempnod.txt, format = TXT, include = junkn(1),n(6),x(11),y(11)  PHASE=NODEMERGE 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 41 September, 2012 

 junkn='N'  ENDPHASE  PHASE=LINKMERGE  _zero=0  junk1=0  junks='S'  junkp='P'  fffff='{cm3pri}' /*;commented out 04/02/2012if(fffff=='SW') 

 if(li.1.admclass==1 && li.1.district <13 && li.1.district>0)  junkp='P' ;state system

elseif(li.1.district<13 && li.1.district>0) 

 junkp='G' ;non-state

else 

 junkp='U' ;out of state

endif 

elseif(fffff='OMS')  if(li.1.admclass<6)  junkp='P'  else  junkp='G'  endif endif */;commented out 04/02/2012jurisdic=' ' nhs=0 fedfunc=li.1.fedfuncl  junkb=' '  ctoll=0; =cartoll*10

ttoll=0; =trktoll*10mdist = LI.1.DIST*1000 

 moffpspd=li.1.offpspd*100  mpeakspd=li.1.peakspd*100  cap=li.1.{cm3capf}*{cm3kfact}  loneway='1' ; el_oneway change

bcap=0 

 bvol=0 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 42 September, 2012 

 boffpspd=0  bpeakspd=0  blanes=0  bterrain=0  mpostspd=round(li.1.postspd)  vol=@volff@  trkvol=@trkff@  vol1=@vol1s@  vol2=@vol2s@  vol3=@vol3s@  vol4=@vol4s@  vol5=@vol5s@  vol6=@vol6s@  vol7=@vol7s@  vol8=@vol8s@  vol9=@vol9s@  vol10=@vol10s@  vol11=@vol11s@  vol12=@vol12s@  vol13=@vol13s@  vol14=@vol14s@  vol15=@vol15s@  vol16=@vol16s@  ENDPHASE ENDRUN

aqmode='{cm3aqtype}' 

if(aqmode=='MOBILE') *copy {cm3effile.q} tempef.txt *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\postcms10.exe templnk.txt tempcms.txt N tempef.txt *del tempef.txt else *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\postcms10.exe templnk.txt tempcms.txt N NONE {cm3rmendif if(aqmode=='MOVES') *copy {cm3effile.q} tempef.txt if(rrmode='NORMAL' && trkfff == 'NONE')then *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesnet.exe hourly.rpt tempef.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3else *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesnet.exe hourly.rpt tempef.txt cmstext.rpt {cm3{cm3tpce} 3 endif 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 43 September, 2012 

endif RUN PGM=NETWORK

 NETI[1]={cm3neti.q} 

 LINKI[2]=tempcms.txt var=a,1-6,b,8-13,  cVMT,97-111,cTRKVMT,113-128,cVOLPERLANE,130-137,cCONINDEX,139-146,  cVCRATIO,148-155,cPEAKHOUR,157-160,cVHT,162-169,cCONGDELAY,171-178,  cPHYSDELAY,180-187,cSPDLIMDELAY,189-196,cDELAYRATIO,198-205,  cDIR1HRSEXCEED,229-232,cDIR2HRSEXCEED,234-237,cPKVMT,253-267,cEXCEEDVMT,269-283,  cEXCEEDPKVMT,285-299,cLOS,317,1,,,1,  select=(substr(record,1,1)!= 'A')  NODEI[2]=tempnod.txt var=n,2-7, x,8-18, y,19-29  NETO={cm3neto.q}  MERGE RECORD=F 

ENDRUN

iiztype='{cm3iztype}' 

if(iiztype=='TEXT') *copy {cm3ifile.q} tempif.txt elseif(iiztype=='OMSTABLE') 

RUN PGM=MATRIX 

FILEO PRINTO[1] = tempif.txt 

FILEI MATI[1] = {cm3ifile.q} MW[1]=mi.1.5+mi.1.10+mi.1.15 jloop if(j=i) print list=i(4.0),mw[1][j](6.0),printo=1 endif endjloop 

ENDRUN

endif 

if(iiztype!='NONE') *copy {cm3afile.q} tempaf.txt if(aqmode=='MOBILE') *copy {cm3ieffile.q} tempief.txt *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\intracal2.exe tempif.txt summary.rpt tempaf.txt tem*del tempief.txt 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 44 September, 2012 

elseif(aqmode=='MOVES') *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesintra.exe tempif.txt tempef.txt tempaf.txt cms{cm3aqfact} *del tempef.txt endif *del tempaf.txt *DEL tempif.txt endif if(aqmode=='MOVES') *copy {cm3ieffile.q} tempief.txt *copy {cm3vfile.q} tempveh.txt *N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\utils\movesveh.exe tempveh.txt tempief.txt cmstext.rpt {c*del tempveh.txt *del tempief.txt endif if(aqmode=='MOVES') *echo MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT > tempcom.txt elseif(aqmode=='MOBILE') *echo MOBILE BASED EMISSIONS REPORT >> tempcom.txt else *echo NO EMISSIONS ANALYSIS CONDUCTED >> tempcom.txt endif *echo {cm3aqcom} >> tempcom.txt *echo Loaded Network: {cm3neti} >> tempcom.txt *echo Network Emission Factors: {cm3effile} >> tempcom.txt if(aqmode=='MOVES') *echo Vehicle Emission Factors: {cm3ieffile} >> tempcom.txt *echo Vehicle Population : {cm3vfile} >> tempcom.txt else *echo Intrazonal Emission Factors: {cm3ieffile} >> tempcom.txt endif *echo Intrazonal Trips : {cm3ifile} >> tempcom.txt *echo Area File (sq mi): {cm3afile} >> tempcom.txt *echo Volume Field Used: {cm3volf} >> tempcom.txt *echo Truck Volume Field Used: {cm3trkf} >> tempcom.txt *echo Capacity Field Used: {cm3capf} >> tempcom.txt *echo ----------------------------------------- >> tempcom.txt 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 45 September, 2012 

*copy /B tempcom.txt+cmstext.rpt {cm3rpto.q} *if exist {cm3sumo.q} del {cm3sumo.q} *rename summary.rpt {cm3sumo.q} *del tempcom.txt *del cmstext.rpt *DEL tempnod.txt *DEL templnk.txt *DEL tempcms.txt hhro=rightstr('{cm3hro}',4) if(hhro=='NONE') *del hourly.rpt else *if exist {cm3hro.q} del {cm3hro.q} *rename hourly.rpt {cm3hro.q} endif 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 46 September, 2012 

Appendix B – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2002

MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC Loaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2002\AQ_asgn_2002.net Network Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2002_MORPC_on-Model.csv Intrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA02.txt Area File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt Volume Field Used: VOL24_TOT Truck Volume Field Used: NONE Capacity Field Used: CAP24 -----------------------------------------  CMS/AQ REPORT  POSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTG  DATE:09/13/2012 TIME:12:33:52  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3 PCTADT TRK URB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 PCTDIR URB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40 URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46 RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44 RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 47 September, 2012 

LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375 SPEEDVC 

curve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5 curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8 curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6 curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2 curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5 curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4 curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2 curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9 curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8 curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4 curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9 curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5 curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12 curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6 curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6 curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1 curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9 curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8 curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6 curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9 VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)  BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00 B 0.30 0.00 0.25 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 48 September, 2012 

C 0.50 0.10 0.40 

D 0.70 0.30 0.60 E 0.90 0.50 0.80 F 1.00 1.00 1.00 F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10 F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30 SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED) FFS B C D E F >47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16. >37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13. >32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10. <33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREA NUM LOS DEFINITION 1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM) 2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1) 3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA 4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING) MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30 MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30 MAX ITERATIONS : 1000 TRUCK PCE: 2.0 AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08 MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOTCLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUT  COUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5 DEL JULY 4306883. 9.1051 20.5004 0.0000 0.0000  ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FAI JULY 1417727. 2.2644 5.7411 0.0000 0.0000  FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FRA JULY 29280512. 100.7557 186.8220 0.0000 0.0000  FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 49 September, 2012 

 GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LIC JULY 5179005. 12.5632 26.7256 0.0000 0.0000  LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAD JULY 942926. 2.1289 4.7316 0.0000 0.0000  MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PIC JULY 783343. 1.0289 2.8963 0.0000 0.0000  PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  UNI JULY 1336487. 3.1306 6.7589 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 50 September, 2012 

 VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  XXX JULY 32247. 0.0305 0.0978 0.0000 0.0000  TOT JULY 43273344. 130.9436 254.2020 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUT FRANKLIN COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 22899. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 22899. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 24731. 0.0361 0.0975 0.0000 0.0000 DELAWARE COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 3706. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 3706. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 4003. 0.0058 0.0158 0.0000 0.0000 LICKING COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 13104. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 13104. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 14152. 0.0207 0.0558 0.0000 0.0000 FAIRFIELD COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 6751. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 6751. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 7291. 0.0107 0.0287 0.0000 0.0000 MADISON COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1505. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1505. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 1625. 0.0024 0.0064 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1599158. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1599158. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 1727091. 57.3172 50.9247 0.0000 0.0000
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 51 September, 2012 

Appendix C – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2006

 MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC Loaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2006\AQ_asgn_2006.net Network Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2006_MORPC_on-Model.csv Intrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA06.txt Area File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt Volume Field Used: VOL24_TOT Truck Volume Field Used: NONE Capacity Field Used: CAP24 -----------------------------------------  CMS/AQ REPORT  POSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTG  DATE:09/13/2012 TIME:07:29:47  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3 PCTADT TRK URB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 PCTDIR URB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40 URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46 RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44 RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 52 September, 2012 

LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375 SPEEDVC curve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5 curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8 curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6 curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2 curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5 curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4 curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2 curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9 curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8 curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4 curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9 curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5 curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12 curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6 curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6 curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1 curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9 curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8 curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6 curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9 VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)  BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 53 September, 2012 

B 0.30 0.00 0.25 

C 0.50 0.10 0.40 D 0.70 0.30 0.60 E 0.90 0.50 0.80 F 1.00 1.00 1.00 F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10 F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30 SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED) FFS B C D E F >47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16. >37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13. >32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10. <33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREA NUM LOS DEFINITION 1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM) 2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1) 3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA 4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING) MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30 MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30 MAX ITERATIONS : 1000 TRUCK PCE: 2.0 AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08 MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOTCLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUT  COUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5 ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 54 September, 2012 

 BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEL JULY 4812232. 6.2135 16.8636 0.0000 0.0000  ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FAI JULY 1770176. 2.0425 5.8175 0.0000 0.0000  FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FRA JULY 32708992. 70.2347 156.0723 0.0000 0.0000  FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LIC JULY 5199066. 8.2578 20.7311 0.0000 0.0000  LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAD JULY 868393. 1.0000 2.8513 0.0000 0.0000  MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 55 September, 2012 

 MUS JULY 125146. 0.1424 0.4038 0.0000 0.0000  NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PIC JULY 1009566. 1.0398 3.1643 0.0000 0.0000  PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  UNI JULY 1565270. 2.4668 6.2493 0.0000 0.0000  VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  XXX JULY 39376. 0.0328 0.1094 0.0000 0.0000  TOT JULY 48081208. 91.3737 212.1500 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUT FRANKLIN COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 24478. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 24478. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 26436. 0.0264 0.0826 0.0000 0.0000 DELAWARE COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 4674. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 4674. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 5047. 0.0050 0.0158 0.0000 0.0000 LICKING COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 10689. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 10689. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 11544. 0.0115 0.0360 0.0000 0.0000 FAIRFIELD COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 6809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 56 September, 2012 

 APRIL 6809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 7354. 0.0073 0.0230 0.0000 0.0000 MADISON COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1326. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1326. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 1432. 0.0014 0.0045 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1707692. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1707692. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 1844307. 55.5444 52.7627 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 57 September, 2012 

Appendix D – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2012

MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT 

Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC Loaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2012\AQ_asgn_2012.net Network Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2012_MORPC_on-Model.csv Intrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA12.txt Area File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt Volume Field Used: VOL24_TOT Truck Volume Field Used: NONE Capacity Field Used: CAP24 -----------------------------------------  CMS/AQ REPORT  POSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTG  DATE:09/13/2012 TIME:15:13:00  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3 PCTADT TRK URB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 PCTDIR URB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40 URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46 RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44 RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 58 September, 2012 

LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375 SPEEDVC 

curve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5 curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8 curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6 curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2 curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5 curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4 curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2 curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9 curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8 curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4 curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9 curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5 curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12 curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6 curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6 curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1 curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9 curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8 curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6 curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9 VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)  BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00 B 0.30 0.00 0.25 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 59 September, 2012 

C 0.50 0.10 0.40 

D 0.70 0.30 0.60 E 0.90 0.50 0.80 F 1.00 1.00 1.00 F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10 F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30 SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED) FFS B C D E F >47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16. >37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13. >32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10. <33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREA NUM LOS DEFINITION 1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM) 2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1) 3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA 4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING) MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30 MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30 MAX ITERATIONS : 1000 TRUCK PCE: 2.0 AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08 MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOTCLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUT  COUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5 ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 60 September, 2012 

 CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEL JULY 5578098. 3.1299 10.3512 0.0000 0.0000  ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FAI JULY 1828928. 0.9712 3.2728 0.0000 0.0000  FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FRA JULY 33228732. 30.4787 83.6261 0.0000 0.0000  FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LIC JULY 5379881. 3.4650 10.8492 0.0000 0.0000  LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAD JULY 928855. 0.4713 1.6267 0.0000 0.0000  MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MUS JULY 81020. 0.0401 0.1387 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 61 September, 2012 

 NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PIC JULY 845430. 0.3903 1.4099 0.0000 0.0000  PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  UNI JULY 1657974. 1.1736 3.5966 0.0000 0.0000  VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  XXX JULY 128857. 0.0450 0.1840 0.0000 0.0000  TOT JULY 49643836. 40.1468 114.9978 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUT FRANKLIN COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 25809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 25809. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 27874. 0.0121 0.0459 0.0000 0.0000 DELAWARE COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 5915. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 5915. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 6388. 0.0028 0.0105 0.0000 0.0000 LICKING COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 13314. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 13314. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 14379. 0.0062 0.0237 0.0000 0.0000 FAIRFIELD COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 6903. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 6903. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 62 September, 2012 

 JULY 7455. 0.0032 0.0123 0.0000 0.0000 MADISON COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1305. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1305. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 1410. 0.0006 0.0023 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1871395. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1871395. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 2021107. 40.8047 47.3824 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 63 September, 2012 

Appendix E – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emissions Run Report for 2020

MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC Loaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2020\AQ_asgn_2020.net Network Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2020_MORPC_on-Model.csv Intrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA20.txt Area File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt Volume Field Used: VOL24_TOT Truck Volume Field Used: NONE Capacity Field Used: CAP24 -----------------------------------------  CMS/AQ REPORT  POSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTG  DATE:09/13/2012 TIME:07:34:55  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3 PCTADT TRK URB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 PCTDIR URB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40 URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46 RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44 RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 64 September, 2012 

LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375 SPEEDVC 

curve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5 curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8 curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6 curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2 curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5 curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4 curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2 curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9 curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8 curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4 curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9 curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5 curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12 curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6 curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6 curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1 curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9 curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8 curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6 curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9 VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)  BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00 B 0.30 0.00 0.25 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 65 September, 2012 

C 0.50 0.10 0.40 

D 0.70 0.30 0.60 E 0.90 0.50 0.80 F 1.00 1.00 1.00 F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10 F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30 SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED) FFS B C D E F >47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16. >37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13. >32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10. <33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREA NUM LOS DEFINITION 1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM) 2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1) 3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA 4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING) MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30 MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30 MAX ITERATIONS : 1000 TRUCK PCE: 2.0 AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08 MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOTCLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUT  COUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5 ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 66 September, 2012 

 CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEL JULY 6856806. 1.5382 4.4924 0.0000 0.0000  ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FAI JULY 2213755. 0.4771 1.4152 0.0000 0.0000  FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FRA JULY 36204300. 12.9738 31.7279 0.0000 0.0000  FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LIC JULY 6287961. 1.6358 4.5266 0.0000 0.0000  LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAD JULY 1106322. 0.2266 0.6870 0.0000 0.0000  MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MUS JULY 107030. 0.0235 0.0696 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 67 September, 2012 

 NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PIC JULY 997123. 0.1863 0.5916 0.0000 0.0000  PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  UNI JULY 2184941. 0.6106 1.6676 0.0000 0.0000  VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  XXX JULY 155643. 0.0216 0.0776 0.0000 0.0000  TOT JULY 56097780. 17.6851 45.2416 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUT FRANKLIN COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 27210. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 27210. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 29386. 0.0051 0.0170 0.0000 0.0000 DELAWARE COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 7967. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 7967. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 8605. 0.0015 0.0050 0.0000 0.0000 LICKING COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 15458. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 15458. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 16695. 0.0029 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 FAIRFIELD COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 9123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 9123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 68 September, 2012 

 JULY 9852. 0.0017 0.0057 0.0000 0.0000 MADISON COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 1587. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 1587. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 1714. 0.0003 0.0010 0.0000 0.0000 MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 2089669. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 2089669. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 2256843. 25.7675 40.2006 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 69 September, 2012 

Appendix F – MORPC Travel Demand Model Emission Run Report for 2035

MOVES BASED EMISSIONS REPORT Ozone Analysis with MOVES - MORPC Loaded Network: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\networks\2035\AQ_asgn_2035.net Network Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\factors\Source_Type_Pop_2035_MORPC_on-Model.csv Intrazonal Trips : N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\intra_z\county\FRA35.txt Area File (sq mi): N:\AQ\MOVES\morpc\Ozone\model\AQ\area_taz\TAZ_areain.txt Volume Field Used: VOL24_TOT Truck Volume Field Used: NONE Capacity Field Used: CAP24 -----------------------------------------  CMS/AQ REPORT  POSTCMS10, UPDATED DEC 2009, GTG  DATE:09/13/2012 TIME:07:37:19  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3 PCTADT TRK URB FWY 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 5.3 6.0 6.3 6.4 6.4 5.8 5.2 4.6 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 2.8 2.4 URB ART 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.3 3.9 5.9 6.9 6.7 7.1 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.0 5.0 3.7 2.8 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 RUR FWY 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.1 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 RUR ART 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.2 3.0 4.2 5.3 6.1 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.7 PCTDIR URB FWY 38 40 40 46 56 64 70 70 68 62 58 52 52 46 38 38 46 52 46 42 42 40 URB ART 44 46 44 48 54 62 66 68 64 56 54 52 50 46 40 38 46 52 48 46 46 46 RUR FWY 44 46 48 54 60 68 68 64 58 54 52 50 50 48 42 40 44 48 48 44 46 44 RUR ART 40 42 44 48 58 66 72 68 60 56 54 50 50 46 40 38 46 50 46 44 44 44 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 70 September, 2012 

LOS E VC 0 0.625 1.25 1.875 2.5 3.125 3.75 4.375 5 5.625 6.25 6.875 7.5 9.375 10 10.625 11.25 11.875 12.5 13.125 13.75 14.375 SPEEDVC 

curve1 75 75 75 75 75 75 74.9 74.8 74.6 74.2 73.5 72.3 70.5 59.5 54 47.7 41.2 34.9 28.9 23.7 19.2 15.5 curve2 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 69.9 69.8 69.6 69.2 68.4 67.1 58.2 53 47 40.5 33.9 27.7 22.2 17.6 13.8 curve3 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 65 64.9 64.8 64.4 63.8 57 52 45.4 37.8 29.9 22.7 16.7 12.1 8.6 curve4 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.6 59.1 54.3 50.8 46.1 40.3 33.8 27.3 21.3 16.2 12.2 curve5 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.7 52.3 50 46.5 41.5 35.3 28.5 21.9 16.1 11.5 curve6 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 59.9 59.8 59.7 59.4 59.1 56.5 55 53.1 50.7 47.9 44.7 41.1 37.3 33.4 curve7 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 54.9 54.9 54.7 54.5 54.2 52.2 50.9 49.3 47.3 44.9 42.1 39 35.7 32.2 curve8 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.4 47.7 46.7 45.4 43.8 41.8 39.5 36.8 33.9 30.9 curve9 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 44.9 44.8 44.7 44.4 43 42.1 40.9 39.4 37.6 35.5 33.1 30.5 27.8 curve10 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.7 49.4 49 48.4 47.5 46.5 45.1 39.6 37.3 34.9 32.4 29.8 27.3 24.9 22.6 20.4 curve11 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.7 49.4 48.9 48 46.7 44.9 42.5 32.6 28.7 25 21.4 18.2 15.3 12.9 10.8 9 curve12 50 50 50 50 50 49.9 49.8 49.6 49.1 48.2 46.8 44.5 41.4 28 23.1 18.7 14.9 11.8 9.2 7.2 5.7 4.5 curve13 40 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.5 39.2 38.6 37.8 36.7 31.4 29 26.4 23.7 21.1 18.5 16.1 13.9 12 curve14 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.8 39.6 39.1 38.5 37.5 36.1 34.3 26.5 23.5 20.5 17.7 15.1 12.8 10.7 9 7.6 curve15 40 40 40 40 40 39.9 39.7 39.4 38.8 37.9 36.5 34.7 32.3 23.2 20 17 14.3 11.9 9.9 8.2 6.8 5.6 curve16 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.8 34.5 34 33.2 32.1 30.5 28.5 20.6 17.9 15.2 12.8 10.7 8.9 7.4 6.1 5.1 curve17 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.7 34.4 33.9 33.1 32 30.3 28.3 20.3 17.5 14.9 12.5 10.4 8.6 7.2 5.9 4.9 curve18 35 35 35 35 35 34.9 34.6 34.2 33.5 32.4 30.9 28.8 26.3 17.4 14.6 12.1 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 curve19 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.8 29.5 29 28.2 27.1 25.6 23.7 16.6 14.2 12 10 8.3 6.8 5.6 4.6 3.8 curve20 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.4 28.9 28.1 26.9 25.3 23.4 16.1 13.6 11.4 9.5 7.8 6.4 5.3 4.3 3.6 curve21 30 30 30 30 30 29.9 29.7 29.3 28.7 27.7 26.2 24.4 22.1 14.4 12 9.9 8.1 6.6 5.4 4.4 3.6 2.9 VC RATIO TO LOS CONVERSION (VALUE SHOWN IS LOWER LIMIT FOR THAT LOS)(URBAN ROADS USE SPEED BREAKS BELOW FOR LOS DETHE BASE VC'S TO DETERMINE EXCEEDANCE)  BASE RUR2 FWY A 0.00 0.00 0.00 B 0.30 0.00 0.25 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 71 September, 2012 

C 0.50 0.10 0.40 

D 0.70 0.30 0.60 E 0.90 0.50 0.80 F 1.00 1.00 1.00 F+ 1.10 1.10 1.10 F++ 1.30 1.30 1.30 SPEED VC RATIO BREAKS FOR URBAN STREETS (HIGHEST SPEED FOR GIVEN LOS & FF SPEED) FFS B C D E F >47 42. 34. 27. 21. 16. >37 35. 28. 22. 17. 13. >32 30. 24. 18. 14. 10. <33 25. 19. 13. 9. 7. LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD BY AREA NUM LOS DEFINITION 1 F CINCINNATI,CLEVELAND,COLUMBUS CENTRAL MPO COUNTIES (CUY,FRA,HAM) 2 E OTHER TMA MPOS (AKRON,CANTON,DAYTON,TOLEDO,YOUNGSTOWN + NON-CENTRAL COUNTIES FROM 1) 3 E OTHER MPOS & PARTS OF AREAS 1 & 2 OUTSIDE URBANIZED AREA 4 E RURAL NON MPO COUNTIES PEAK SPREADING MODEL INFO (SET MAX ITERATIONS TO 0 TO DISABLE PEAK SPREADING) MAX VC RATIO FWY: 1.30 MAX VC RATIO ART: 1.30 MAX ITERATIONS : 1000 TRUCK PCE: 2.0 AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08 MODEL CLASS PARAMETERS (MAX 4 CLASSES, HOURS 0-23 W/ NO OVERLAP IN CLASS, ALLOCATE ENTIRE CLASS AS TRUCK(1) OR NOTCLS TRK 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS BEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS END 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CLS NUM 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  MOVES NETWORK LINK EMISSIONS OUTPUT  COUNTY MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  ADA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ALL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ASD JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ATH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  AUG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BEL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BRO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  BUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 72 September, 2012 

 CAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CHP JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CLI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  COS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CRA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  CUY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  DEL JULY 9338410. 1.3861 3.2052 0.0000 0.0000  ERI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FAI JULY 2966111. 0.4322 1.0092 0.0000 0.0000  FAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  FRA JULY 41885732. 9.7187 18.9322 0.0000 0.0000  FUL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GAL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GEA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  GUE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HIG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HOL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  HUR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JAC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JEF JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  KNO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LAW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LIC JULY 7956386. 1.3890 3.0306 0.0000 0.0000  LOG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LOR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  LUC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAD JULY 1456698. 0.2000 0.4773 0.0000 0.0000  MAH JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MED JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MEG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MIA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MOT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRG JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MRW JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  MUS JULY 154280. 0.0223 0.0521 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 73 September, 2012 

 NOB JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  OTT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PAU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PER JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PIC JULY 1290973. 0.1665 0.4128 0.0000 0.0000  PIK JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  POR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PRE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  PUT JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  RIC JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  ROS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SCI JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SEN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SHE JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  STA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  SUM JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TRU JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  TUS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  UNI JULY 3240407. 0.5868 1.2784 0.0000 0.0000  VAN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  VIN JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAR JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAS JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WAY JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WIL JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WOO JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  WYA JULY 0. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  XXX JULY 205305. 0.0189 0.0528 0.0000 0.0000  TOT JULY 68479568. 13.9114 28.4374 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES INTRAZONAL EMISSIONS OUTPUT FRANKLIN COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 29831. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 29831. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 32217. 0.0037 0.0096 0.0000 0.0000 DELAWARE COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 11821. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 11821. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 12767. 0.0015 0.0038 0.0000 0.0000 LICKING COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 19500. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 19500. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 21060. 0.0024 0.0062 0.0000 0.0000 FAIRFIELD COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 13281. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 13281. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 74 September, 2012 

 JULY 14343. 0.0016 0.0043 0.0000 0.0000 MADISON COUNTY  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 2123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 2123. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 2293. 0.0003 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 2500242. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 2500242. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 2700262. 23.9915 43.1206 0.0000 0.0000
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 75 September, 2012 

Appendix G – MORPC HPMS VMT and Emissions

COMBINED OFF-MODEL AREA EMISSIONS 2002 MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORT You should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analyst Input VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2002.csv Network Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2002MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2002_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv -----------------------------------------  DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:16:32  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3  AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004  MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 4266744. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 4266744. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 4608084. 3.6745 14.2835 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 128680. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 128680. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 138974. 4.6122 4.0978 0.0000 0.0000 2006 MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORT You should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analyst Input VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2006.csv Network Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2006MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2006_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 76 September, 2012 

-----------------------------------------  DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:15:56  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3  AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004  MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 4638015. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 4638015. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 5009057. 2.7543 11.9524 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 138410. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 138410. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 149483. 4.5019 4.2765 0.0000 0.0000 2012 MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORT You should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analyst Input VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2012.csv Network Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2012MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2012_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv -----------------------------------------  DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:02:12  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 77 September, 2012 

RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3  AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004  MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 4964033. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 4964033. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 5361156. 1.2868 6.6290 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 153006. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 153006. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 165246. 3.3362 3.8740 0.0000 0.0000 2020 MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORT You should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analyst Input VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2020.csv Network Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2020MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2020_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv -----------------------------------------  DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:17:17  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3  AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004  MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 5514595. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 5514595. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 5955763. 0.5708 2.6214 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 78 September, 2012 

 MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 172469. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 172469. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 186267. 2.1267 3.3179 0.0000 0.0000 2035 MOVES BASED HPMS EMISSIONS REPORT You should enter a comment to add to the AQ report indicating reason and analyst Input VMT File: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\MORPC_All_Off-Model_VMT_2035.csv Network Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpd.csv Vehicle Emission Factors: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\2035MORPC_ozone_3source_rpv.csv Vehicle Population: I:\ut\temp\nino\morpc\Source_Type_Pop_2035_MORPC_off-model_HPMS.csv -----------------------------------------  DATE:09/20/2012 TIME:14:17:55  PARAMETER FILE DUMP (DAILY.DAT FILE) HOUR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PCTADT 

URB FWY 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.2 5.2 7.3 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.2 8.0 7.9 5.8 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.5 URB ART 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.5 3.5 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.3 6.2 6.5 7.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 4.8 4.0 3.0 1.9 1.3 RUR FWY 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 3.7 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.7 7.1 7.5 7.0 5.6 4.5 3.8 3.2 2.5 2.0 RUR ART 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.0 2.4 4.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.8 6.0 7.6 8.1 7.7 5.6 4.2 3.5 2.8 1.9 1.3  AQ SEASON FACTOR: 1.08000004  MOVES HPMS EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VMT HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 6580958. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 6580958. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 7107435. 0.4533 1.7070 0.0000 0.0000  MOVES VEHICLE BASED EMISSIONS OUTPUT  MONTH VEHICLES HC NOX SO2 PM2.5  JANUARY 208960. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  APRIL 208960. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000  JULY 225677. 2.0051 3.6038 0.0000 0.0000 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 79 September, 2012 

Appendix H – Interagency consultation

Subject RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors

From Nick Gill 

To Brunello, Nino; PJividen@AkronOhio.gov; CBaker@akronohio.gov; Jeff Dutton; Bill Davis; aramirez@mvrpc.org; 

Saleem Salameh; Lima (tmazur@lacrpc.com); smapel@lcounty.com; 'randy.durst@movrc.org' 

(randy.durst@movrc.org); sschmid@clarkcountyohio.gov; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; David Gedeon; 

rsharma@belomar.org; krodi@eastgatecog.org 

Cc Fred Durham; Dines, Jennifer; Patricia Morris (Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov) 

(Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov); Moore, Dave; Byram, Mark; Chandra Parasa 

Sent Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:33 PM 

 

This seems appropriate to me. 

Nick 

 

From: Brunello, Nino [mailto:Nino.Brunello@dot.state.oh.us] 

Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 2:30 PM 

To: PJividen@AkronOhio.gov; CBaker@akronohio.gov; Jeff Dutton; Bill Davis; Nick Gill; 

aramirez@mvrpc.org; Saleem Salameh; Lima (tmazur@lacrpc.com); smapel@lcounty.com; 

'randy.durst@movrc.org' (randy.durst@movrc.org); sschmid@clarkcountyohio.gov; 

mikepap@bhjmpc.org; David Gedeon; rsharma@belomar.org; krodi@eastgatecog.org 

Cc: Fred Durham; Dines, Jennifer; Patricia Morris (Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov) 

(Morris.Patricia@epamail.epa.gov); Moore, Dave; Byram, Mark 

Subject: FW: Ozone Summer Day Factors 

 

All: 

After discussions with ODOT, OEPA, WVDEP, and USEPA, we are of the opinion that there needs to be an 

additional seasonal factor for summer when calculating ozone pollutants. 

 

There is currently an adjustment for increasing average daily VMT (+ 8%) which was used in previously 

when using Moblie6 to generate emission factors. With MOVES, there is a vehicle component used in 

addition to VMT, so there needs to be an adjustment from average number of vehicles to the number of 

vehicles in summer day. We propose to use the same 8% increase. 

 

We need to have an inter-agency agreement on this, and would prefer to do it via email (to make it 

easier on all of us). Please respond with your approval and/or questions. 

 

Thanks, 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Nino Brunello, P.E. 

Modeling & Forecasting Section 

Division of Planning 

Ohio Department of Transportation 

(614) 752-5742 

 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 80 September, 2012 

From: Dines, Jennifer 

Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:04 AM 

To: Brunello, Nino; Durham, William F 

Cc: Moore, Dave 

Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors 

 

Nino and Fred, talked to Pat and she agrees that BOTH VMT and number of vehicles should have the 

1.08 factor applied. 

 

Pat suggested we should have consultation on this. I told her ODOT is taking the lead on this project and 

I’d let Dave know........she says email is fine. 

 

Thanks, 

 

Jennifer Dines 

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Wk (614) 644-3696 

Fax (614) 644-3681 

 

From: Brunello, Nino 

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 12:59 PM 

To: Dines, Jennifer; Durham, William F 

Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors 

 

Jennifer/Fred, 

There is another item that needs to be discussed. Since we now calculate emission rates for both VMT 

and number of vehicles, does there need to be a summer adjustment factors for vehicles as well? This 

was not done with MOBILE, so we have nothing to follow. If I had to guess, I would think that there 

would be an increase, but I couldn’t guess as to how many or what factor to use. Maybe just use 1.08 in 

absence of anything better? Thoughts? 

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Nino Brunello, P.E. 

Modeling & Forecasting Section 

Division of Planning 

Ohio Department of Transportation 

(614) 752-5742 

 

From: Dines, Jennifer 

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:47 AM 

To: Brunello, Nino; Durham, William F 

Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors 

 

I’m available 

Jennifer Dines 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 81 September, 2012 

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Wk (614) 644-3696 

Fax (614) 644-3681 

 

From: Brunello, Nino 

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 8:30 AM 

To: Durham, William F; Dines, Jennifer 

Subject: RE: Ozone Summer Day Factors 

 

I can call anytime. Will you both be around at 9:00? If not, when would be the next earliest time? (on 

the half hours) 

 

-Nino 

 

 

From: Durham, William F [mailto:William.F.Durham@wv.gov] 

Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 8:50 AM 

To: Brunello, Nino 

Cc: Dines, Jennifer 

Subject: Ozone Summer Day Factors 

 

Nino: 

I spoke with Jenn this morning and outlined the issue of Summer day VMT v. Average daily VMT. 

We agreed that Pat Morris may be able to shed some light on the question. 

Jenn & my calendars are open next Mon. and Tues. afternoon. Please give me a call & I’ll patch Jenn in. 

Fred 

 

 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 82 September, 2012 

From: Moore, Dave [mailto:Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:36 AM 

To: aramirez@mvrpc.org; Andy Reser ; Bill Davis ; Bob Muransky ; Curtis Baker ; Jeff Dutton ; 

krodi@eastgatecog.org; Lamar Daniel; Leigh Oesterling ; mhill@lcounty.com; mikepap@bhjmpc.org; Nick 

Gill; Phyllis Jividen ; Randy Durst; Saleem Salameh (ssalameh@intelos.net); 

sschmid@clarkcountyohio.gov; Thom Mazur ; henry@tmacog.org 

Cc: Dines, Jennifer; Brunello, Nino 

Subject: FW: Ozone SIP budgets 

 

All, 

See below, OEPA Ozone SIP Update message. Please review your region’s Ozone SIP update 

submissions to OEPA to assure it includes base year mobile emissions inventory (see attached 

spreadsheet – 2002 is the base year for most regions). 

 

Thanks 

DM 

 

From: Dines, Jennifer 

Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 8:17 AM 

To: Moore, Dave 

Cc: Brunello, Nino; Fetty, Erica 

Subject: RE: Ozone SIP budgets 

 

Dave, we need to make sure all the MPOs know the numbers we need to complete our analysis. There 

should be 4 years for everyone (nonattainment/base, attainment, interim and maintenance years, using 

the years in the first tab of the attached sheet. Note that for Dayton there is an asterisk showing that 

2005 was the interim budget year but 2009 was modeled...so we need both 2004 and 2009 years 

remodeled (with all four years being 2002, 2005, 2009, 2018) 

 

Jennifer Dines 

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Wk (614) 644-3696 

Fax (614) 644-3681 

 
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 83 September, 2012 

Area Counties Pollutant Base Year Budget Attainment Year Budget Interim Year Budget Main

Y

Canton Stark 

VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 37.71 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 18.03 2

Lima Allen 

VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 5.08 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 8.28 2

Wheeling Belmont VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 2.60 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 4.69 2

Cincinnati

Hamilton, Butler, 

Clermont, Warren, 

Dearbourne Township, IN 

VOC 2005 NA 2008 NA 2015 31.73 2

NOx 2005 NA 2008 NA 2015 49.00 2

Cleveland

Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, 

Geauga, Lake, Lorain, 

Medina, Portage, Summit 

VOC 2002 NA 2006 NA 2012 46.64 2

NOx 2002 NA 2006 NA 2012 95.89 2

Columbus

Delaware, Fairfield, 

Franklin, Knox Licking, and 

Madison 

VOC 2002 NA 2006 NA 2012 54.86 2

NOx 2002 NA 2006 NA 2012 91.46 2

DaytonSpringField Clark, Greene, Miami, and Montgomery VOC 2002 NA 2005 NA 2005* 29.19 2

NOx 2002 NA 2005 NA 2005* 63.88 2

ParkersburgMarrietta Washington VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 2.59 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 3.58 2

SteubenvilleWeirton Jefferson VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 2.63 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 4.10 2

Toledo* Lucas and Wood VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 18.99 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 33.75 2

Youngstown* Columbiana and Mahoning VOC 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 19.58 2

NOx 2002 NA 2004 NA 2009 33.71 2
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 84 September, 2012 

Subject RE: 2008 Ozone standard transportation conformity 

From Nick Gill 

To Hill, Matt 

Cc Chandra Parasa 

Sent Friday, September 07, 2012 3:24 PM 

 

Thanks. We shouldn’t need anything but will let you know if we do. 

 

Nick 

 

From: Hill, Matt [mailto:mhill@lcounty.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:21 PM 

To: Nick Gill 

Subject: FW: 2008 Ozone standard transportation conformity 

 

Nick, 

 Just let me know what you need from me. 

 Matt 

 

From: Moore, Dave [mailto:Dave.Moore1@dot.state.oh.us] 

Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 7:15 AM 

To: rkoehler@oki.org; Andy Reser ; ngill@morpc.org; Mapel, Sandie; Phyllis Jividen ; 

'cbaker@akronohio.gov'; Bill Davis ; V Nemalapuri (VNemalapuri@mpo.noaca.org) 

Cc: Bartizal, Melinda; Rebillot, Steve; DeHart, Steve; Pat Morris ; leigh.oesterling@dot.gov; Walton, Sara; 

Phinney, Scott; Shepler, Andrew; Hurst, Andrew; Brunello, Nino; Byram, Mark; Fetty, Erica 

Subject: 2008 Ozone standard transportation conformity 

 

All, 

 

US EPA’s May 21, 2012 Federal Register notice designated the Cincinnati, Cleveland/Akron, and Columbus areas as 

marginal nonattainment areas for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. The designations were effective July, 20, 2012. The 

attainment date for the 2008 standard December 31, 2015. Newly designated 2008 Ozone areas must 

demonstrate conformity to the new standard within a one year grace period (July 20, 2013). US EPA also 

concurrently revoked the 1997 Ozone standard effective July 20, 2013. 

 

We need to establish schedules for Transportation Plan and TIP conformity demonstrations addressing the new 

2008 Ozone standard. Issues for consideration: 

• MPO and US DOT Conformity Determinations for the new 2008 standard must be finalized by July 20, 

2013

• Conformity determinations for the 2014-2017 TIPs will also need finalized by July 1, 2013

• Conformity analyses after March 2, 2013 need to be MOVES based

• The Ohio Ozone SIP budgets are still MOBILE based

• US EPA reports that a minimum of 180 days are needed to fully approve (through the Federal 

Register process) SIP revisions to update Ozone budgets to MOVES

• Conformity analyses performed prior to March 2, 2013 can continue to compare MOBILE analysis 

year emissions to MOBILE budgets
Central Ohio On-Road Mobile Emission Estimates 85 September, 2012 

• Conformity analyses after March 2, 2013 (if MOVES based budgets are not yet finalized) will compare 

MOVES based analysis years to MOBILE budgets

 

Please begin thinking about the 2008 conformity demonstrations for your MPO/AQ regions. 

 

Thanks 

DM 

 
Public Notice 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 

Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for the Ohio Portion of the Columbus Ozone 

Basic Nonattainment Area 

Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties 

Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 

(Ohio EPA) is requesting that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. 

EPA) revise the current maintenance plan for the Columbus area, including Delaware, 

Fairfield, Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties, with respect to the 1997 eighthour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Ohio EPA submitted a 

redesignation request and maintenance plan for this area on March 17, 2009 

Subsequently, U.S. EPA approved this requests on September 15, 2009. Air quality 

monitoring data collected in the region demonstrated attainment of the NAAQS and 

there was evidence that the improved air quality is due to permanent, enforceable 

emission reductions. In addition, existing requirements are sufficient to maintain the 

1997 eight-hour ozone standard in this area throughout the maintenance period. 

Ohio EPA is now requesting a revision to the maintenance plan to update mobile 

emission projections and conformity budgets based on emission rates generated from 

U.S. EPA’s latest mobile emissions model, the Motor Vehicle Emission Simulation 

(MOVES) 2010. In December 2009, MOVES replaced MOBILE6.2 as the U.S. EPA’s 

official emission factor model. 

These actions must be noticed to allow public comment and to satisfy U.S. EPA 

requirements for public involvement in SIP related activities. This notice addresses 

Ohio EPA’s reliance on the emission projections as evidence of attainment and 

maintenance and the commitment to institute contingency measures if ambient 

exceedances or violations trigger the contingency plan requirements. Written comments 

will be received on or before December 4, 2012 at the following address: 

E-mail: erica.fetty@epa.state.oh.us

Mailing address: Erica Fetty 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC 

Lazarus Government Center 

P.O. Box 1049 

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 

Phone: (614) 644-2310 

Pursuant to Section 119.03 of the Ohio Revised Code, a public hearing on this 

redesignation request will be conducted as follows: December 4, 2012 at 3:00 P.M., at 

Ohio EPA Central Office at 50 West Town Street, Columbus, Ohio. 

All interested persons are entitled to attend or be represented at the hearings and give 
written or oral comments on these changes. All oral comments presented at the 

hearing, and all written statements submitted at the hearing or to the above address by 

the close of business on December 4, 2012 will be considered by Ohio EPA prior to final 

action on this redesignation. Written statements submitted after December 4, 2012 may 

be considered as time and circumstances permit, but will not be part of the official 

record of the hearing. 

This redesignation and maintenance request is available on Ohio EPA DAPC’s Web 

page for electronic downloading at: http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/1997.aspx. 

Questions regarding accessing the web site should be directed to Arunee Niamlarb at 

614-728-1342; other questions or comments about this document should be directed to 

either Erica Fetty, (614)-644-2310, Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us or Jennifer Dines at 

(614) 644-3696, Jennifer.Dines@epa.state.oh.us or mailed to Erica Fetty or Jennifer 

Dines at the above address. 
 BEFORE THE OHIO EPA 

 - - -

IN RE: :

REDESIGNATION AND :

MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE :

OHIO PORTION OF THE :

COLUMBUS OZONE BASIC :

NONATTAINMENT AREA; :

DELAWARE, FAIRFIELD, :

FRANKLIN, KNOX, LICKING, :

AND MADISON COUNTIES. :

 - - -

Taken before Michelle K. Douridas, 

a Registered Professional Reporter and 

Notary Public in and for the State of Ohio, 

at 50 East Town Street, Columbus, Ohio, 

commencing on Tuesday, December 4th, 2012, at 

3:00 p.m.

 - - -

 MODERATOR MARY McCARRON 

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
 P R O C E E D I N G S 

- - - 

MODERATOR McCARRON: My name's Mary 

McCarron. I'm Public Involvement Manager for 

Ohio EPA and will be presiding over the hearing 

today. 

Thanks for taking the time to attend the 

hearing.

The purpose of the hearing is to obtain 

comments from any interested person regarding 

Ohio EPA's proposed action. 

The State of Ohio is requesting that 

U.S. EPA revise the current maintenance plan for 

the Columbus area, including Delaware, Fairfield, 

Franklin, Knox, Licking, and Madison Counties, 

with respect to the 1997 eight-hour ozone 

national ambient air quality standard.

Ohio EPA is now requesting a revision to 

the maintenance plan to update mobile emission 

projections and conformity budgets based on 

emission rates generated from U.S. EPA's latest 

mobile emissions model, the Motor Vehicle 

Emission Simulation 2010. 

In December 2009, MOVES replaced MOBILE 

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
6.2 as the U.S. EPA's official emission factor 

model.

All interested persons are entitled to 

attend and be represented and to present oral 

and/or written comments regarding the proposed 

action. 

All written and oral comments received 

as part of the official record will be considered 

by the Director of Ohio EPA. 

To be included on the official record, 

written comments must be received by Ohio EPA by 

the close of business today, December 4th, 2012. 

These comments may be filed with me or e-mailed 

to Erica Fetty. 

All written comments submitted for the 

record receive the same consideration as any oral 

testimony given today. 

Written statements submitted after today 

may be considered as time and circumstances 

permit but won't be part of the official record 

of the hearing.

 At this time I will call on the only 

person in attendance to provide testimony. 

So, Dave Celebrezze, if you'd like to, 

3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
provide your testimony.

MR. CELEBREZZE: Thank you. My name is 

David Celebrezze, Director of Air and Water 

Special Projects with the Ohio Environmental 

Council. 

We appreciate this opportunity to 

comment. 

The Ohio Environmental Council is a 

statewide, nonprofit environmental organization 

whose mission is to secure healthy air, land, and 

water for all those who call Ohio home. 

On behalf of our over 100 environmental 

and conservation member organizations and 

thousands of members throughout the State of 

Ohio, the OEC respectfully submits the following 

comments on the proposed redesignation and 

maintenance plan of Central Ohio in meeting the 

1997 ozone standard of .08 parts per million 

(ppm). 

It is our understanding that the 

redesignation request is based on data from the 

years 2006 through 2008. The data indicates that 

Central Ohio does meet the attainment when 

rounding the third digit in the parts per 

4 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
million. 

The highest average occurred in Franklin 

County at .084 parts per million, which, when 

rounded, is .08 parts per million; thus, meeting 

the standard. The OEC supports this 

redesignation. 

Cars, trucks, buses, construction 

equipment, power plants, and manufacturing 

outfits are the main culprits for emitting 

smog-forming pollutants. 

The formation of smog has plagued many 

regions of the state, including Central Ohio. It 

is critical that the state address ozone 

pollution in a way that reduces the harmful 

impacts of this pollution. 

The health impacts are well documented. 

Some of the impacts according to U.S. EPA ozone 

can be: 

Cause shortness of breath and pain when 

taking a deep breath; 

aggravate lung diseases such as asthma, 

emphysema, and chronic bronchitis;

increase the frequency of asthma 

attacks; 

5 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
make the lungs more susceptible to 

infection; 

continue to damage the lungs even when 

the symptoms have disappeared. 

When someone is affected by ozone 

pollution, it impacts our economy and quality of 

life. 

A sick person is missing time from work 

or school. If it is a child, a parent may have 

to miss work and spend more money on medication, 

inhalers, or hospitalizations if the number of 

asthma attacks increases. This not only lowers 

the quality of life in Central Ohio, it impacts 

our economy. 

Those at greatest risk include the most 

vulnerable in our society; children, the elderly, 

and those with breathing problems. 

In essence, when we talk about the 

numbers of people directly impacted by ozone 

pollution, we need to realize that the actual 

number of people impacted directly and indirectly 

is much greater. 

For every one person impacted directly, 

there are two, three or more people who are 

6 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
indirectly impacted. 

Has the Ohio EPA researched how much 

money it costs Central Ohio when not meeting the 

standard and/or during an air quality alert day 

or several days after an air quality alert day? 

In additional to health impacts, ozone 

pollution impacts our environment. It clouds the 

national vistas of our parks and wildlife refuges 

and interrupts plant processes. 

Ozone has the same impact on other 

mammals; impacts to the lung function as well as 

weakens the immune system. 

It can decrease the species diversity 

and change nutrient and water cycles. There's 

nothing good about smog. 

Moving foward: While great strides have 

been made over the years to improve air quality, 

and the OEC supports this redesignation request, 

the state should re-double its clean air efforts. 

Ohio has had poor air quality for too 

long and it is too costly and too harmful to the 

public. 

According to the Mid-Ohio Regional 

Planning Commission, MORPC, Central Ohio 

7 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
experienced a total of 69 air quality alert days 

from 2006 to 2008. This means it is recommended 

that sensitive groups reduce the amount of time 

they spend outside during the hottest part of the 

day. 

The Ohio EPA highlights several control 

measures and regulations. While these are good 

measures with actual reductions able to be 

demonstrated, the majority are a result of 

federal regulation. 

The Ohio EPA does indicate many good 

contingency measures that it can pursue and we 

think they should. 

Furthermore, the Kasich Administration 

and the state should: 

Increase the underfunded Diesel Emission 

Reduction Grant program to $100 million a year 

for five years; 

adopt a no-idling law similar to the 

laws in Cleveland, Lakewood, and other cities in 

Northeast Ohio; 

require all construction equipment 

working on public projects to meet Tier 4 engine 

standards; 

8 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
to adopt an E-check-like program for 

on-road diesel trucks; 

reinvest in truck stop electrification; 

and put resources in teaming up with 

metropolitan planning organizations and 

nonprofits to educate the public on ozone 

pollution prevention and steps to reduce 

residents' exposure. 

Are these clean air measure actions the 

state has looked into? 

The Kasich Administration should do 

everything feasible to achieve maximum reductions 

in smog-forming pollutants. 

We know that the .08 parts per million 

is not the most protective of public health and 

that medical researchers recommend a standard 

between .06 and .07 ppm. 

In conclusion, the OEC supports the 

redesignation, but the state should not get a 

false sense of security, as we know newer ozone 

standards are here that the state needs to meet. 

We encourage the state to adopt stronger 

measures to protect our environment, families, 

and communities. 

9 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
Thank you again for this opportunity to 

comment. 

I also have photos to submit that show 

diesel pollution, show an air quality alert day, 

and then how ozone is formed. 

MODERATOR McCARRON: Excellent. Thank 

you, David. 

At this time there's nobody else present 

to provide testimony, so we'll go off the record 

until 3:30. 

(Short break in proceedings.)

MODERATOR McCARRON: At this time it is 

3:30 and nobody else is present who would like to 

provide testimony, so this hearing is adjourned. 

- - -

Thereupon, at 3:30 on Tuesday, December 

4th, 2012, the hearing was concluded.

- - -

10 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
C E R T I F I C A T E

STATE OF OHIO :

SS:

COUNTY OF LICKING : 

I, Michelle K. Douridas, a Registered 

Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and 

for the State of Ohio, duly commissioned and 

qualified, do hereby certify that this hearing 

was by me reduced to stenotype; that the 

foregoing is a true and correct transcript of the 

hearing; that the hearing was taken at the time 

and place in the caption specified and was 

completed without adjournment; and that I am in 

no way related to or employed by any attorney or 

party hereto, or financially interested in the 

action, and I am not, nor is the court reporting 

firm with which I am affiliated, under a contract 

as defined in Civil Rule 28(D).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set 

my hand and affixed my seal of office at 

Pataskala, Ohio, on this 12th day of December, 

2012.

___________________________

MICHELLE K. DOURIDAS, RPR

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF OHIO

My Commission Expires: July 16th, 2013.

11 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF GREEN 

December 4, 2012 

Submitted to: 

Erica Fetty 

1207 Grandview Avenue, Suite 201 

Columbus, Ohio Lf3212 

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC 

lazarus Government Center 

P.O. Box 1049 

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 

(614) 1J87-7506 

www.theOEC.org 

Ohio Environmental Council's Comments on Proposed redesignation of central Ohio in meeting 

the 1997 national ozone standard 

The Ohio Environmental Council (OEC) is a statewide, nonprofit environmental organization whose mission is 

to secure healthy air, land, and water for all who call Ohio home. On behalf of our over 100 environmental and 

conservation member organizations and thousands of members throughout the state of Ohio, the OEC 

respectfully submits the following comments on the proposed redesignation and maintenance plan of central 

Ohio in meeting the 1997 ozone standard of .o8 parts per million (ppm). 

It is our understanding that the redesignation request is based on data from the years 2oo6 through 2008. The 

data indicates that central Ohio does meet the attainment when rounding the third digit in the parts per 

million. The highest average occurred in Franklin County at .o84ppm; which, when rounded, is .o8ppm (thus 

meeting the standard).The OEC supports this redesignation. 

Ozone, health and environmental impacts 

Ozone pollution is formed when nitrogen oxides (NOx), and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) cook in the 

long, hot days of summer. The formation of smog has plagued many regions of the state including central 

Ohio. It is critical that the state address ozone pollution in a way that reduces the harmful impacts of this 

pollution. The health impacts are well documented. According to the US EPA ozone can: 

• Make it more difficult to breathe deeply and vigorously. 

• Cause shortness of breath and pain when taking a deep breath. 

• Cause coughing and sore or scratchy throat. 

• Inflame and damage the airways. 

• Aggravate lung diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis. 

• Increase the frequency of asthma attacks. 

• Make the lungs more susceptible to infection. 

• Continue to damage the lungs even when the symptoms have disappeared. 

When someone is affected by ozone pollution it impacts our economy and quality of life. A sick person is 

missing time from work or school. If it is a child, a parent may have to take time off of work. Additionally, those 

suffering from respiratory ailments-like asthma-may have to spend more money to get medication, inhalers, or 

hospitalizations if the number of asthma attacks increases. This not only lowers the quality of life in central 

Ohio it impacts our economy. Those at greatest risk include the most vulnerable in our society-children, the 

elderly, and those with breathing problems. In essence, when we talk about the numbers of people directly 

impacted by ozone pollution, we need to realize that the actually number of people impacted (directly and 

indirectly) is much greater. Has the Ohio EPA researched how much money it costs central Ohio when our air 

is unhealthy? 
In addition to health impacts, ozone pollution impacts our environment. It clouds the natural vistas of our 

parks and wildlife refuges and interrupts plant processes. Ozone has the same impact on other mammalsimpacts to lung function as well as weakens the immune system.!! can decrease the species diversity and 

change nutrient and water cycles. There is nothing good about smog. 

Moving forward 

While great strides have been made over the years to improve the air quality, and the OEC supports this 

redesignation request, the state should re-double its clean air efforts. Ohio has had poor air quality for too 

long and it is too costly, and too harmful to the public. According to the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning 

Commission (MORPC) central Ohio experienced a total of 69 air quality days from 2oo6-2oo8; with 2006 being 

the highest (30). This means it is recommended that sensitive groups reduce the amount of time they spend 

outside during the hottest part of the day. The Ohio EPA highlights several control measures and regulations 

starting on page 26 of the redesignation request document. While these are good measures with actually 

reductions able to be demonstrated, the majority are a result of federal regulation. The Ohio EPA does indicate 

many good contingency measures (starting on page 31) that it can pursue and they should. Furthermore, the 

Kasich Administration and the state should: 

• Increase the underfunded Diesel Emission Reduction Grant program to $100 million a year for five 

years. This level of funding will punch a big dent in dirty air and be a clear win for the economy, public 

health, and the environment; 

• Adopt a no-idling law similar to the laws in Cleveland, Lakewood, and other cities in northeast Ohio; 

• Require all large construction equipment working on public projects to meet tier 4 engine standards; 

• Adopt an E-check-like program for on-road diesel trucks; and, 

• Reinvest in truck stop electrification. 

• Teaming up with metropolitan planning organizations and non profits to educate the public on ozone 

pollution prevention and steps to reduce residents' exposure. 

Are these clean air measure actions the state has looked into? The Kasich Administration should do everything 

feasible to achieve maximum reductions in smog-forming pollutants. We know that the .o8ppm is not the most 

protective of public health and that medical researchers recommend a standard between .o6 and .o7ppm. 

Thank you again for this opportunity to comment on the Ohio EPA's redesignation request and maintenance 

plan for the Columbus, OH ozone nonattainment area. 

Sincerely, 

J!J,JJ. "R "A' \,31 .. t-:»-

David R. Celebrezze 

Dir. of Air & Water 

Special Projects 

2 


z c 

(/) ~ m + j; i§ ., ('"') 

+ 

:r: 

ro 

!!:!. 

go:. 

(.Q 

c 

::u 

-· (0 

;;r 

II 

0 

N 

0 

:J 

ro 
Division of Air Pollution Control 

Response to Comments 

Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan 

For the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the Columbus Area 

Agency Contact for this Package

Division Contact: (Erica Fetty, Division of Air Pollution Control, 614-644-2310, 

Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us) 

Ohio EPA held a public hearing in Columbus, OH on December 4, 2012, regarding the revised 

Maintenance Plan for the former Columbus Ozone Nonattainment Area. This document 

summarizes the comments and questions received at the public hearing and during the 

associated comment period, which ended on December 4, 2012. Ohio EPA reviewed and 

considered all comments received during the public comment period. 

By law, Ohio EPA has authority to consider specific issues related to protection of the 

environment and public health. 

The name of the commenter follows the comment in parentheses. 

Comment 1: The attached testimony was provided at the public hearing in 

support of Ohio’s revised maintenance plan. Furthermore, the 

speaker encouraged Ohio to pursue other efforts to further clean 

the air. (David Celebrezze- Ohio Environmental Council) 

Response 1: Thank you for your support of Ohio’s revised maintenance plan. 

We also appreciate and understand the concerns regarding the 

effects of ozone pollution. With the promulgation of the latest 

ozone standard, at 75 ppb, Ohio EPA is analyzing air quality 

around Ohio to determine if additional programs will be 

necessitated in order to attain this newer, lower, ozone standard by 

December 31, 2015. Thank you for your suggestions on ways to 

further improve air quality in Ohio.