alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

Appellate case name: Holly Brooke Schaumleffel v. GS/TPRF III Houston Med.

Ctr., LP

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 516

- CV

Trial court case number: 1110670

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

Th is Court’s September 5, 2018 Memorandum Order of Referral to Mediation (“Mediation Order”) had referred this appeal to mediation. On the same day, th e Clerk of
this Court’s September 5, 2018 notice had gr anted the appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file her brief until October 4, 2018. After appellee filed its objection to the Mediation Order on September 7, 2018, this Court’s September 12, 2018 Order withdrew

the Mediation Order. On October 8, 2018, appellant’s brief was filed.

On October 12, 2018, appellee filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Appellee contends that this appeal should be dismissed for appellant’s failure

“ to timely comply with almost all appellate deadline(s) set by this Honorable Court” under

Rule 42.3(c), or for appellant’s failure to timely file a brief and for failing to reasonably explain the failure, under Rule 38.8(a)(1). In the alternative, because appellee contends that appellant’s brief, filed on October 8, 2018, three business days after the deadline, constitutes a frivolous appeal, appellee requests that it should be awarded damages, under

Rule 45

. Appellant has filed a response.

Accordingly, because appellant’s brief was filed on Octo ber 8, 2018, the Court

DENIES the appellee’s motion to dismiss and request for damages. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

38.8 (a)(2), 45

. Appellee’s brief remains due by November 7, 2018.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: October 23, 2018

______________________
### §§336a, 336b. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787

Section 336a, act July 30, 1956, ch. 778, §1, 70 Stat. 715, related to absence during 1956 to 1959 due to economic conditions and protection of rights of entryman.

Section 336b, act July 30, 1956, ch. 778, §2, 70 Stat. 716, related to homestead or desert land applications on file as of Mar. 1, 1956, and entries and rights of United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787, provided that the repeal made by section 702 is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, except such effective date to be on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as homestead laws apply to public lands in Alaska.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### §11103. Slop chests

(a) A vessel to which section 11102 of this title applies shall be provided with a slop chest containing sufficient clothing for the intended voyage for each seaman, including—

(1) boots or shoes;

(2) hats or caps;

(3) underclothing;

(4) outer clothing;

(5) foul weather clothing;

(6) everything necessary for the wear of a seaman; and

(7) a complete supply of tobacco and blankets.

(b) Merchandise in the slop chest shall be sold to a seaman desiring it, for the use of the seaman, at a profit of not more than 10 percent of the reasonable wholesale value of the merchandise at the port at which the voyage began.

(c) This section does not apply to a vessel on a voyage to Canada, Bermuda, the West Indies, Mexico, or Central America, or a fishing or whaling vessel.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 578.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11103 | 46:67046:671 |

46:671

Section 11103 requires that a United States vessel on a foreign or intercoastal domestic voyage be equipped with a slop chest and lists the items the slop chest must contain.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001021810
<NAME>                        InteliData Technologies Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Apr-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                                     18,268
<SECURITIES>                               33,896
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (523)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           54,160
<PP&E>                                      6,103
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,517)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             56,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       8,186
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       39
<OTHER-SE>                                 48,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               56,941
<SALES>                                       165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,895
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            7,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,945)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,845)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.13)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2




Independent Accountant’s Report








Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)


One Wachovia Center


301 South College Street, DC-7


Charlotte, NC 28288





U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)


Corporate Trust Department


100 Wall Street


New York, NY 10005








Re:
STRATSTrust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2004-8 (the “Trust”)




Ladies and Gentlemen:





We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank National Association, (the “Trustee” and Together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of June 29, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), in respect of the STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Group Securities, Series 2004-8(the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination.





Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2009.








/s/ Aston Bell, CPA





New York, New York


March 22, 2010
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have
issued our report dated June 23, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of Rand
Logistics, Inc. on form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Rand Logistics, Inc. on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-143291 and 333-117051)
and Form S-8 (No. 333-152609).
 
 /s/ Grant
Thornton LLP
 
 Grant
Thornton LLP
 Hamilton,
Canada
 June 24,
2009
§ 58.71 Request for release of funds and certification. ( a ) The RROF and certification shall be sent to the appropriate HUD Field Office (or the State, if applicable), except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section. This request shall be executed by the Certifying Officer. The request shall describe the specific project and activities covered by the request and contain the certification required under the applicable statute cited in § 58.1(b). The RROF and certification must be in a form specified by HUD.
( b ) When the responsible entity is conducting an environmental review on behalf of a recipient, as provided for in § 58.10, the recipient must provide the responsible entity with all available project and environmental information and refrain from undertaking any physical activities or choice limiting actions until HUD (or the State, if applicable) has approved its request for release of funds. The certification form executed by the responsible entity's certifying officer shall be sent to the recipient that is to receive the assistance along with a description of any special environmental conditions that must be adhered to in carrying out the project. The recipient is to submit the RROF and the certification of the responsible entity to HUD (or the State, if applicable) requesting the release of funds. The recipient must agree to abide by the special conditions, procedures and requirements of the environmental review, and to advise the responsible entity of any proposed change in the scope of the project or any change in environmental conditions.
( c ) If the responsible entity determines that some of the activities are exempt under applicable provisions of this part, the responsible entity shall advise the recipient that it may commit funds for these activities as soon as programmatic authorization is received. This finding shall be documented in the ERR maintained by the responsible entity and in the recipient's project files.
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2998 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 DRAWBACK CLAIMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the draw10 back claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c). 
2 

•HR 2998 IH 

1 (b) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts due 

2 pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of the claims 

3 described in subsection (c) shall be paid not later than 

4 90 days after the date of such liquidation or reliquidation. 

5 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re6 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback claim number Filing 

date 

BI6/0693003–9 10/07/97 

BI6/0693103–7 10/07/97 

BI6/0793003–8 10/03/97 

BI6/0793037–6 10/03/97 

BI6/0793038–4 10/03/97 

BI6/0793039–2 10/03/97 

BI6/0893040–9 10/07/97 

BI6/0893041–7 10/10/97 

BI6/0993042–4 10/10/97 

BQ7/0000202–6 08/10/98 

BQ7/0000203–4 08/10/98 

BQ7/0000204–2 08/10/98 

BQ7/0000208–3 08/10/98 

BQ7/0000209–1 08/10/98 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3251 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3251

 To permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer 
  Continental Shelf off the State of Florida, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

     Ms. Harris (for herself, Mr. Mack, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. 
Bilirakis, Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of 
 Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Foley, Mr. Keller, Ms. 
Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Crenshaw, 
    Mr. Stearns, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Feeney, Ms. Wasserman 
Schultz, and Mr. Meek of Florida) introduced the following bill; which 
               was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the outer 
  Continental Shelf off the State of Florida, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Florida Coastline Protection Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease for the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural 
gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the eastern Gulf of Mexico planning area;
            ``(2) the Straits of Florida planning area; or
            ``(3) the South Atlantic planning area, extending from the 
        Straits of Florida planning area to the border between the 
        States of Florida and Georgia.''.
                                 <all>
```
### **CHAPTER 105—COASTWISE VOYAGES**

Sec.
10501.
Application.
10502.
Shipping articles agreements.
10503.
Exhibiting merchant mariners' documents.
10504.
Wages.
10505.
Advances.
10506.
Trusts.
[10507.
Repealed.]
10508.
General penalties.
10509.
Penalty for failing to begin voyage.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**1993**—Pub. L. 103–206, title IV, §415(b), Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2438, struck out item 10507 "Duties of shipping commissioners".
§ 507.8 Recording keeping of closed meetings. ( a ) The Board shall maintain an electronic recording of the proceedings of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public.
( b ) The Board, after review by the Chairman, shall make promptly available to the public in a place easily accessible to the public, a complete transcript or electronic record of the discussion of any item on the agenda, or any item of testimony of any witness received at the Board meeting, except for such item or items of such discussion or testimony as the Board determines to contain information which may be withheld under § 507.4. Copies of such record, disclosing the identity of each speaker, shall be furnished to any person at the actual cost of duplication. The Board shall maintain a complete transcript or electronic copy of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, for a period of at least two years after such meeting, or until one year after the conclusion of any Board proceeding with respect to which the meeting or portion was held, whichever occurs later.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
May 5, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130935 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _______________ _____________ Stephen J. Markman, Justices IN RE NICOLE STEP HANIE TARBOX and COLE ROBERT TA RBOX, Minors.

_____________ _______________ _____________
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, f/k/a FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 130935 COA: 264808 Oakland CC Family Division: 03-685109-NA MARK ROBERT TARBOX, Respondent-Appellant,

and

SALNA RENATA KORANY, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0502 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
May 5, 2006
Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF HOMECOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,519,019
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,118,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,557
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,523,374
<PP&E>                                         680,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,195,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,120,483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           296
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,984,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,195,718
<SALES>                                         17,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,617,574
<CGS>                                            9,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  704,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,127,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                43,712
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,291,798) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,291,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,291,798)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.57)
        

</TABLE>
a

-93°G9° G0"
26° 00’ 00”

25°54’ 00”

25° 487 0G"

25° 42’ 00”

257 36’ CO”

25* 30’ 00" +
-93°0

-92"54" 06” -92* 48’

Me

3129

iow 3

N > sien

-92% 30" 00”

ee

\
\

Pp \
0/00”

BRYANT CANY

—
\ “ee,
\

x

-92°54’ 00” -92°48' 00” -92°42' 00” ~92% 30’ 00”

aya

-92* 24’ 00"

792° 12' 00"

-92* 24’ 00”

-92* 06’ 00”

VR

S

SCALE:

-92* 06’ 00”
BRYANT CANYON N2S5092W

1:100,000

NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS
Contours in corrected meters

-92* 00° 00”

. 33

2

e

g

i=

1 og

i é

&
26° 00’ 00”

nel

b

5

z

oI

g

ZzBoa

8

5 8

25°54’ 00”

# 25°48’ 00"

|

25°42'00" |

vr feehves yuvhogr

|
|

hal-WT

Haan

ISIN ONE

do

BIAINN SNIMWEC

ire

:
S
zZ
2
5
65
5
3
§
2
z

5* 36’ 00” 2
3
a
ol
8
3
Z

|

i

25° 30’ 00”

cb’ 00”

7

5

2

+ z
6

38

33

3

5

Z

LM174 g

HSaBINNN SONIC

|
}
|
i
|
|

|
|

JSIANN SNIMVEC
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 682 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court is in receipt of the letter dated May 18, 2010

from a coalition of media organizations informing the court of the

media coalition’s interest in recording, broadcasting and

webcasting closing arguments in the above-captioned case. Doc

#670.

The court removed the case from the Ninth Circuit pilot

project on audio-video recording and transmission on January 15,

2010. Doc #463. No further request to include the case in the

pilot program is contemplated. The media coalition’s request is

therefore DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 682 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Peter
      C. Mann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that Amendment No. 2
      to the Annual Report of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A
      for the year ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      applicable, and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents
      in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc.




/s/ 
                PETER C. MANNName:
                Peter C. MannTitle:*Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*Date: January 12, 2006