alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 232.254 Withdrawal of project funds, including for repayments of advances from the borrower, operator, or management agent.

Borrower may make and take distributions of mortgaged property, as set forth in the mortgage loan transactional documents, to the extent and as permitted by the law of the applicable jurisdiction, provided that, upon each calculation of borrower surplus cash (as defined by HUD), which calculation shall be made no less frequently than semi-annually, borrower must demonstrate positive surplus cash, or to the extent surplus cash is negative, repay any distributions taken during such calculation period within 30 calendar days unless a longer time period is approved by HUD. Borrower shall be deemed to have taken distributions to the extent that surplus cash is negative unless, in conjunction with the calculation of surplus cash, borrower provides to HUD documentation evidencing, to HUD's reasonable satisfaction, a lesser amount of total distributions. To the extent that the provisions of this section are inconsistent with the provisions in a borrower's existing transactional loan documents, including without limitation any HUD-required regulatory agreement, the provisions of the transactional loan documents shall apply.

[77 FR 55136, Sept. 7, 2012]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A. Ton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
§ 1003.205 Eligible planning, urban environmental design and policy-planning-management-capacity building activities. ( a ) Planning activities which consist of all costs of data gathering, studies, analysis, and preparation of plans and the identification of actions that will implement such plans, including, but not limited to comprehensive plans, community development plans and functional plans in areas such as housing and economic development. In addition, other plans and studies such as capital improvements programs, individual project plans, general environmental studies, and strategies and action programs to implement plans, including the development of codes and ordinances are also eligible activities. With respect to the costs of individual project plans, engineering and design costs related to a specific activity are eligible as part of the cost of such activity under §§ 1003.201 through 1003.204 and are not considered planning costs. Also, costs necessary to comply with the requirements of 24 CFR part 58, including project specific environmental assessments and clearances for activities eligible under this part are eligible as part of the cost of such activities under §§ 1003.201 through 1003.204.
( b ) Policy—planning—management—capacity building activities including those which will enable the grantee to determine its needs, set long term goals and short term objectives, devise programs to meet these goals and objectives, evaluate the progress being made in accomplishing the goals and objectives. In addition, actions necessary to carry out management, coordination and monitoring of activities necessary for effective planning implementation are eligible planning activities, however the costs necessary to implement the plans are not.
§ 906.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part states the requirements and procedures governing public housing homeownership programs involving sales of individual dwelling units to families or to purchase and resale entities (PREs) for resale to families carried out by public housing agencies (PHAs), as authorized by section 32 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437z-4) (1937 Act). A PHA may only transfer public housing units for homeownership under a homeownership program approved by HUD under this part, except as provided under § 906.3. This section does not govern new construction or substantial rehabilitation of units sold under this part. Such construction or rehabilitation is governed by the public housing development and modernization regulations.
( b ) Under a public housing homeownership program, a PHA makes available for purchase by low-income families for use as their principal residences public housing dwelling units, public housing developments, and other housing units or developments owned, assisted, or operated, or otherwise acquired by the PHA for sale under a homeownership program in connection with the use of assistance provided under the 1937 Act (1937 Act funds). A PHA may sell all or a portion of a property for purposes of homeownership in accordance with a HUD-approved homeownership program, and in accordance with the PHA's annual plan under part 903 of this title.
### §4505. Termination of unsafe operations

An official authorized to enforce this chapter—

(1) may direct the individual in charge of a vessel to which this chapter applies to immediately take reasonable steps necessary for the safety of individuals on board the vessel if the official observes the vessel being operated in an unsafe condition that the official believes creates an especially hazardous condition, including ordering the individual in charge to return the vessel to a mooring and to remain there until the situation creating the hazard is corrected or ended; and

(2) may order the individual in charge of an uninspected fish processing vessel that does not have on board the certificate required under section 4503(a)(2) of this title to return the vessel to a mooring and to remain there until the vessel is in compliance with that section, except that this paragraph shall not apply with respect to a vessel to which section 4503a 1 applies.

(Added Pub. L. 100–424, §2(a), Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1587; amended Pub. L. 115–282, title V, §509, Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4503a, referred to in par. (2), was repealed by Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11509(a)(3), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4137.

#### Amendments

2018—Par. (2). Pub. L. 115–282 substituted "4503(a)(2)" for "4503(1)" and inserted ", except that this paragraph shall not apply with respect to a vessel to which section 4503a applies" before period at end.

1 See References in Text note below.
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-121434on Form S-8 of our report dated March 22, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statementsof Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries and the combined financial statements of Great LakesPredecessor (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includesan explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of SFAS 150, “Accounting for Certain FinancialInstruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”), appearing inthis annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
§ 904.115 Achievement of ownership by subsequent homebuyers. ( a ) *Definition.* In the event the initial homebuyer and his family vacate the home before having acquired ownership, a subsequent occupant who enters into a Homebuyer's Ownership Opportunity Agreement and who is not a successor pursuant to § 904.107(l)(2) is herein called a “subsequent homebuyer.”
( b ) *Determination of initial purchase price.* The initial purchase price for a subsequent homebuyer shall be an amount equal to ( 1 ) the purchase price shown in the initial homebuyer's Purchase Price Schedule as of the date of this Agreement with the subsequent homebuyer plus
( 2 ) the amount, if any, by which the appraised fair market value of the home, determined or approved by HUD as of the same date, exceeds the purchase price specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( c ) *Purchase price schedule.* The subsequent homebuyer's Purchase Price Schedule shall be the same as the unexpired portion of the initial homebuyer's Purchase Price Schedule except that where his purchase price includes an additional amount as specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the initial homebuyer's Purchase Price Schedule shall be followed by an Additional Purchase Price Schedule for such additional amount based upon the same monthly debt service and the same interest rate as applied to the initial homebuyer's Purchase Price Schedule.
( d ) *Residual receipts.* After payment in full of the LHA's debt, if there are any subsequent homebuyers who have not acquired ownership of their homes, the LHA shall continue to pay to HUD all residual receipts from the operation of the Project, including payments received on account of any Additional Purchase Price Schedules applicable to the homes, provided the aggregate amount of such payments of residual receipts does not exceed the aggregate amount of annual contributions paid by HUD with respect to the Project.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Ferris, Joseph Levin, Appellants.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include May 1962 Term. If, however, respondent is unable, with reasonable diligence, to file and serve a brief on or before April 26, 1962, such brief may be filed and served on or before June 15, 1962, in which latter event the case shall be argued at the September 1962 Term.
§ 880.613 Emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. ( a ) Covered housing providers must develop and implement an emergency transfer plan that meets the requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e).
( b ) In order to facilitate emergency transfers for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking, covered housing providers have discretion to adopt new, and modify any existing, admission preferences or transfer waitlist priorities.
( c ) In addition to following requirements in 24 CFR 5.2005(e), when a safe unit is not immediately available for a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking who qualifies for an emergency transfer, covered housing providers must: ( 1 ) Review the covered housing provider's existing inventory of units and determine when the next vacant unit may be available; and
( 2 ) Provide a listing of nearby HUD subsidized rental properties, with or without preference for persons of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, and contact information for the local HUD field office.
( d ) Each year, covered housing providers must submit to HUD data on all emergency transfers requested under 24 CFR 5.2005(e), including data on the outcomes of such requests.
[81 FR 80811, Nov. 16, 2016]
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26749]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2021, Through December 
31, 2021

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and 
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2021, 
through December 31, 2021, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Office of Aerospace 
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Policy Branch (AAM-820), 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Room 806, 
Washington, DC 20591; Telephone (202) 267-8442.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's 
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing 
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the 
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive 
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum 
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2019, the random drug test positive 
rate was 0.731%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will 
remain at 25% for calendar year 2021.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum 
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol 
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the 
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at 
10%. In 2019, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.114%. 
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10% 
for calendar year 2021.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual 
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code 
of Federal Regulations Title 14, section 120.109(b) (for drug testing), 
and 120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Brett A. Wyrick,
Acting Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 2020-26749 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
§ 887.101 Purpose, scope, and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) The purpose of the Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) program is to promote the development of local strategies to coordinate the use of Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) assistance with public and private resources, to enable families eligible to receive HUD assistance to achieve economic independence and self-sufficiency.
( 2 ) The purpose of this part is to implement the policies and procedures applicable to operation of an FSS program under HUD's Section 8 Housing assistance payments programs, as established under section 23 of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437u).
( b ) *Scope.* Each owner may implement an FSS program independently or by way of a Cooperative Agreement with a Public Housing Agency (PHA) or another owner. Each owner that administers an FSS program must do so in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( c ) *Applicability.* This part applies to owners of multifamily rental housing properties assisted by Section 8 Housing assistance payments programs. See part 984 of this title for program regulations applicable to PHAs.
( d ) *Non-participation.* Tenant participation in an FSS program is voluntary. Assistance under Section 8 Housing assistance payments programs for a family that elects not to participate in an FSS program shall not be refused, delayed or terminated by reason of such election.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

MICHAEL J. BETTINGER (STATE BAR NO. 122196)

STEPHEN M. EVERETT (STATE BAR NO. 121619)

HOLLY HOGAN (STATE BAR No. 238714)

K&L GATES LLP

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200

San Francisco, California 94111-5994

Telephone: 415.882.8200

Facsimile: 415.882.8220

mike.bettinger@klgates.com

stephen.everett@klgates.com

holly.hogan@klgates.com

ISABELLA E. FU (State Bar No. 154677)

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

One Microsoft Way

Redmond, WA 98052

Telephone: (425) 882-8080

Facsimile: (425) 936-7329

Isabella.Fu@microsoft.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Counterclaimant

MICROSOFT CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SYBASE, INC. and MICROSOFT 

CORPORATION,

Microsoft.

Case No. 3:09-CV-01478 SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Counterclaimant,

vs. 

IMPLICIT NETWORKS, INC.,

Counterdefendant.

Case 3:09-cv-01478-SI Document 51 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01478-SI Document49 Filed01/19/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The Court held a case management conference on January 15, 2010 in the above-captioned 

matter. Following the case management conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court 

amends the schedule in the above-captioned matter, and sets the following schedule: 

LR 4-3 Joint Claim Construction Statement May 13, 2010

Status Conference May 14, 2010 (3 p.m.)

Completion of claim construction discovery May 28, 2010

Opening claim construction brief June 2, 2010

Response claim construction brief June 16, 210

Reply claim construction brief June 23, 2010

Tutorial July 7, 2010 (3:30-5:30 p.m.)

Claim construction hearing July 8, 2010 (3:30-5:30 p.m.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ___________ _____ 

The Honorable Susan Illston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01478-SI Document 51 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01478-SI Document49 Filed01/19/10 Page2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Brown, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, all rendered January 12, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree under each of four indictments (Nos. 1793, 1794, 1795 and 1796, all of 1976), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments as to Indictments Nos. 1794, 1795 and 1796 of 1976 affirmed. No opinion. Judgment as to Indictment No. 1793 reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, plea vacated, and case remanded to Criminal Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. During the allocution preceding the acceptance of the plea to robbery in the first degree under the first or highest count of this indictment, defendant’s recital of the facts spelled out a forcible taking sufficient to constitute robbery in the *second*degree (Penal Law, § 160.10, subd 1), but did not contain any of the "aggravating” elements of the crime to which he was pleading. Under these circumstances, Criminal Term should not have accepted the plea without inquiring further, or, at the very least, should have informed defendant that his version of the crime was inconsistent with his proffered plea (see *People v Beasley,*25 NY2d 483; *People v Serrano,*15 NY2d 304). Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.1
   
  One Bryant Park
  4th Floor  Structured Credit Trading
  New York, NY 10036
  The  undersigned, James W. P. Hall, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New
    York     corporation (the Trustee), hereby certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee
    has     complied, in all material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard
    Terms for     Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the
    Depositor) and     the Trustee, as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and
    securities intermediary     (the Securities Intermediary), in each case as amended by a series supplement between
    the Depositor, the Trustee     and the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached schedule.


Very truly yours,
The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as TrusteeBy:
      /s/
      James W. P. HallName:
      James W. P. HallTitle:
      Vice President


---










---
#### In the Matter of the Intermediate Accounting of United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under the Will of Charles C. Marshall, Deceased, Appellant-Respondent. Charles R. Marshall et al., Respondents-Appellants; Louis J. Lefkowitz, as Attorney-General, Respondent.

Motion granted to the extent of: (a) substituting Marshall Bush Jones, as administrator of the estate of Muriel Marshall J ones, deceased, in place of Muriel Marshall Jones, as a party to the appeals herein; and (b) dispensing with the printing of portions of Exhibit GG, the original exhibit to be submitted to the court on the argument or submission of the appeal. In all other respects the motion is denied. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135068 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

RONALD D. McCUMMINGS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135068 

 COA: 269832 

Gladwin CC: 04-001734-CK 

PIONEER STATE MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CORRIGAN and MARKMAN, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

p0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2008 

 Clerk
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN’S AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE 

OF A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5946, THE 

 “UNITED STATES APPRECIATION FOR OLYMPIANS 

AND PARALYMPIANS ACT” 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5946 changes the short 

title of the bill to the “United States Appreciation for Olympians and Paralympians Act of 2016.” 

The following presents the estimated Federal fiscal year budget effects of the Chairman’s 

amendment: 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26 

 

-1 [1] [1] [1] -1 [1] [1] [1] -1 [1] -2 -3 

NOTE: Details do not add to totals due to rounding. 

[1] Loss of less than $500,000. 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

September 13, 2016 

JCX-73-16
### §8244. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary through fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, to carry out the purposes of this part not to exceed $100,000,000. Funds so appropriated may be transferred by the Secretary to any Federal agency to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of section 8243(a)(3) of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title V, §524, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3277.)