Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules 78813 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated July 21, 2020, and 

effective September 15, 2020, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace. 

* * * * * 

ASW NM D Farmington, NM [Amended] 

Four Corners Regional Airport, NM 

(Lat. 36°44′29′′ N, long. 108°13′48′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface to and including 8,000 feet MSL 

within a 4.7-mile radius of the airport, and 

within 1.8 miles each side of the 086° bearing 

from the airport, extending from the 4.7-mile 

radius to 5.6 miles east of Four Corners 

Regional Airport. This Class D airspace area 

is effective during the specific dates and 

times established in advance by a Notice to 

Airmen. The effective date and time will 

thereafter be continuously published in the 

Chart Supplement. 

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace 

Designated as a Surface Area. 

* * * * * 

ASW NM E2 Farmington, NM [Amended] 

Four Corners Regional Airport, NM 

(Lat. 36°44′29′′ N, long. 108°13′48′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface within a 4.7-mile radius of the 

airport, and within 1.8 miles each side of the 

086° bearing from the airport, extending from 

the 4.7-mile radius to 5.6 miles east of Four 

Corners Regional Airport. This Class E 

airspace area is effective during the specific 

dates and times established in advance by a 

Notice to Airman. The effective date and time 

will thereafter be continuously published in 

the Chart Supplement. 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ASW NM E5 Farmington, NM [Amended] 

Four Corners Regional Airport, NM 

(Lat. 36°44′29′′ N, long. 108°13′48′′ W) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile 

radius of the airport, and within 4 miles 

north and 8 miles south of the 088° bearing 

from the airport, extending from the 6.7-mile 

radius of the airport, and extending from 4 

miles east of the airport to 22.4 miles east of 

the airport, and within 4.2 miles each side of 

the 267° bearing from the airport, extending 

from the 6.7-mile radius to 12.5 miles west 

of Four Corners Regional Airport. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on 

December 1, 2020. 

B.G. Chew, 

Acting Group Manager, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26818 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

22 CFR Part 181 

RIN 1400–AE98 

[Public Notice: 10990] 

Publication, Coordination, and 

Reporting of International Agreements: 

Amendments 

AGENCY: Department of State. 

ACTION: Proposed rule with request for 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The Treaties and Other 

International Acts Series (TIAS) is the 

official treaty series of the United States 

and serves as evidence of the treaties, 

and international agreements other than 

treaties, in all courts of law and equity 

of the United States, and in public 

offices of the federal government and of 

the states, without any need of further 

authentication. Certain international 

agreements may be exempted from 

publication in TIAS, if the Department 

of State provides notice in its 

regulations. With this proposed rule, the 

Department of State is proposing to 

update those regulations to clarify the 

scope of an existing exemption. 

DATES: The Department of State will 

consider comments submitted before 

February 5, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any of the following methods: 

• Email: KottmyerAM@state.gov. You 

must include the RIN 1400–AE98 in the 

subject line of your message. 

• Website: Persons with access to the 

internet may also view this notice and 

provide comments by going to the 

regulations.gov website and searching 

Docket DOS–2019–0045 at: http://

www.regulations.gov/. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Mattler, Treaty Affairs, Office 

of the Legal Adviser, Department of 

State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 

647–1345, or at treatyoffice@state.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State 

is required to cause to be published 

annually a compilation of all treaties 

and international agreements to which 

the United States is a party that were 

signed, proclaimed, or ‘‘with reference 

to which any other final formality ha[d] 

been executed’’ during the calendar 

year. 

The Secretary of State, however, may 

determine that publication of particular 

categories of agreements is not required 

if certain criteria are met (See 1 U.S.C. 

112a(b)). The criteria are: 

(1) Such agreements are not treaties 

that have been brought into force for the 

United States after having received 

Senate advice and consent pursuant to 

section 2(2) of Article II of the 

Constitution of the United States; 

(2) The public interest in such 

agreements is insufficient to justify their 

publication, because (A) as of the date 

of enactment of the Foreign Relations 

Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 

and 1995, the agreements are no longer 

in force; (B) the agreements do not 

create private rights or duties, or 

establish standards intended to govern 

government action in the treatment of 

private individuals; (C) in view of the 

limited or specialized nature of the 

public interest in such agreements, such 

interest can adequately be satisfied by 

an alternative means; or (D) the public 

disclosure of the text of the agreement 

would, in the opinion of the President, 

be prejudicial to the national security of 

the United States; and 

(3) Copies of such agreements (other 

than those in paragraph (2)(D)), 

including certified copies where 

necessary for litigation or similar 

purposes, will be made available by the 

Department of State upon request. 

Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a(c), any such 

determination must be published in the 

Federal Register. The Department 

proposes amending the exemption 

contained in 22 CFR 181.8(a)(9) to 

clarify its scope. 22 CFR 181.8(a)(9) 

exempts from publication ‘‘Agreements 

that have been given a national security 

classification pursuant to Executive 

Order No. 13526, its predecessors or 

successors.’’ The Department proposes 

amending this subsection to read 

‘‘Agreements that have been given a 

national security classification pursuant 

to Executive Order No. 13526, its 

predecessors or successors, or are 

otherwise exempt from public 

disclosure pursuant to U.S. law.’’ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
78814 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules 

In proposing this change, the 

Department wishes to clarify that the 

scope of the exemption contained in 22 

CFR 181.8(a)(9) includes agreements 

that have not been given a national 

security classification pursuant to 

Executive Order No. 13526, its 

predecessors or successors, but 

nonetheless are exempt from public 

disclosure pursuant to U.S. law. The 

principal category of agreements for 

which this clarification is relevant are 

agreements that are exempt from public 

disclosure pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 130c, 

which authorizes specified national 

security officials to withhold from 

public disclosure otherwise required by 

law sensitive information of foreign 

governments and international 

organizations. 

Regulatory Analysis 

Administrative Procedure Act 

The Department is issuing this 

proposed rule for comment in 

accordance with the Administrative 

Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive 

Order 13272: Small Business 

This rulemaking is hereby certified as 

not expected to have a significant 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq. 

The Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 

This rulemaking does not constitute a 

major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, 

for purposes of congressional review of 

agency rulemaking. 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 

1995 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally 

requires agencies to prepare a statement 

before proposing any rule that may 

result in an annual expenditure of $100 

million or more by State, local, or tribal 

governments, or by the private sector. 

This rule will not result in any such 

expenditure nor would it significantly 

or uniquely affect small governments. 

Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: 

Federalism and Executive Order 13175, 

Impact on Tribes 

This rule will not have substantial 

direct effects on the States, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. Nor will the 

regulations have federalism 

implications warranting the application 

of Executive Orders 12372 and 13132. 

This rule will not have tribal 

implications, will not impose costs on 

Indian tribal governments, and will not 

pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the 

requirements of Executive Order 13175 

do not apply to this rulemaking. 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563: 

Regulatory Review 

This rule has been drafted in 

accordance with the principles of 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. This 

rule has been determined to be a 

significant rulemaking under section 3 

of Executive Order 12866, but not 

economically significant. With respect 

to the costs and benefits of this rule, the 

Department notes that agreements 

addressed by the proposed clarification 

are, by definition, already exempt from 

public disclosure pursuant to U.S. law. 

The proposed rule is intended to 

provide greater clarity to the application 

of the existing rule rather than to effect 

a change in existing practices regarding 

the publication of agreements. For this 

reason, the Department does not 

anticipate any costs to the public from 

this rulemaking. Therefore, the 

Department believes that the benefits of 

this rulemaking outweigh any costs. 

Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice 

Reform 

This rule has been reviewed in light 

of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, 

minimize litigation, establish clear legal 

standards, and reduce burden. 

Executive Order 13771 

This proposed rule is not expected to 

be subject to the requirements of 

Executive Order 13771 because this 

proposed rule is expected to result in no 

more than de minimis costs. 

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), Federal 

agencies must obtain approval from 

OMB for each collection of information 

they conduct, sponsor, or require 

through regulation. This rule contains 

no new collection of information 

requirements. 

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181 

Treaties. 

For the reasons set forth above, 22 

CFR part 181 is proposed to be amended 

as follows: 

PART 181—COORDINATION, 

REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF 

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS 

■ 1. The Authority section for Part 181 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22 

U.S.C. 2651a. 

§ 181.8 [Amended] 

■ 2. In § 181.8 revise paragraph (a)(9) to 

read as follows: 

(a) * * * 

* * * * * 

(9) Agreements that have been given 

a national security classification 

pursuant to Executive Order No. 13526, 

its predecessors or successors, or are 

otherwise exempt from public 

disclosure pursuant to U.S. law. 

* * * * * 

Zachary A. Parker, 

Director, Office of Directives Management, 

Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26718 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–08–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Docket Nos. 18–143, 10–90, 14–58; FCC 

19–95; FRS 17234] 

The Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and 

the Connect USVI Fund, Connect 

America Fund, ETC Annual Reports 

and Certifications; Correction 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notification of intent to correct. 

SUMMARY: This document announces 

that the Commission will correct an 

error in the regulatory text of a Federal 

Register document that took major steps 

to promote the deployment of advanced, 

hardened networks in the Territories by 

allocating nearly a billion dollars in 

Federal universal service support in 

Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands 

once an effective date is established for 

the relevant section. The summary was 

published in the Federal Register on 

November 7, 2019. 

DATES: When the Commission publishes 

a document in the Federal Register 

announcing the effective date of the 

sections published 84 FR 59937 

(November 7, 2019), it will also correct 

this error. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexander Minard, Wireline 

Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

summary contains a correction to the 

regulatory text of a Federal Register 

document, 84 FR 59937, November 7, 

2019. The full text of the Commission’s 

Report and Order and Order on 

Reconsideration in WC Docket Nos. 18– 

143, 10–90, 14–58; FCC 19–95, released 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS