alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 26.40 Motions. ( a ) *General.* All motions shall state the specific relief requested and the basis therefore and, except during a conference or the hearing, shall be in writing. Written motions shall be filed and served in accordance with § 26.30. Either party may submit a proposed order with any motion.
( b ) *Response to motions.* Unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ, a response to a written motion may be filed within 10 days after service of the motion. A party failing to respond timely to a motion may be deemed to have waived any objection to the granting of the motion.
( c ) *Motions for extensions.* Either party may file a motion for extension. At the discretion of the ALJ, a motion for an extension of time may be granted for good cause at any time, notwithstanding an objection or any reply to the motion, consistent with § 26.32(f). The ALJ may waive the requirements of this section as to motions for extensions of time or any page limits.
( d ) *Right to reply.* The moving party shall have no right to reply, except as permitted by the ALJ.
( e ) *Oral Argument.* Either party may request oral argument on any motion, but such argument shall be available at the sole discretion of the ALJ.
( f ) *Motions for summary judgment.* ( 1 ) A party claiming relief or a party against whom relief is sought may timely move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim.
( 2 ) Objections in the consideration of summary judgment motions or answers thereto based upon a failure to strictly comply with the provisions of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may, at the discretion of the ALJ, be overruled.
( g ) *Motions for dismissal.* When a motion to dismiss the proceeding is granted, the ALJ shall make and file a determination and order in accordance with the provisions of § 26.50.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

*E-Filed 4/5/10*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

GREGORY BENDER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH

AMERICA CORP., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02112 RS

ORDER

Pursuant to the Reassignment Order issued by the undersigned, the parties filed a Joint

Case Management Statement on April 2, 2010. After considering the Joint Case Management

Statement submitted by the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

THAT:

1. The deadline for defendants to serve their invalidity contentions shall be extended by fortyfive (45) days from the date of this Order. All other hearing dates and deadlines imposed prior

to the Reassignment Order of March 18, 2010 are vacated. 

2. A Case Management Conference shall be held on May 27, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom

3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. 

The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement on or before May 20, 2010 with a

proposed schedule leading up to and including the claim construction hearing.

Case 3:09-cv-02112-RS Document 47 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/5/10 

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02112-RS Document 47 Filed 04/05/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

ERSKINE & TULLEY

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

MICHAEL J. CARROLL (St. Bar #50246)

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 392-5431

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SHEET METAL

WORKERS, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

 

vs. 

SOUTH CITY REFRIGERATION, etc., 

Defendant. 

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C 09 2311 CRB

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

IT IS ORDERED that the Case Management Conference in this

case set for May 21, 2010 be continued to June 8, 2010 at 8:30 a.m.

in Courtroom No. 8, 19rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 

Dated:_________________ 

 _______________________________

 Honorable Charles R. Breyer

May 10, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

June 25, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02311-CRB Document 38 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Aspeon, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2003 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1034, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       October 25, 2005

By /s/ David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.73
 Supplemental Agreement of Asset, Business and Personnel Transfer Agreement
 
        i.
    
    In the event that the actual Net Profit is equal to or more than RMB
2,650,000 but less than RMB 2,950,000, Party B hereby agree to pay an additional RMB
168,750 as third installment of the equity transfer price;ii.
    
    In the event that the actual Net Profit is equal to or more than RMB
2,950,000 but less than RMB 3,250,000, Party B agree to pay an extra RMB 168,750, in
addition to the amount of RMB stated in Article 3(i), as third installment of the
equity transfer price. Hence, the total additional payment is RMB 337,500.iii.
    
    In the event that the actual Net Profit is equal to or more than RMB
3,250,000 but less than RMB 3,550,000, Party B agree to pay an extra RMB 168,750, in
addition to the amount of RMB stated in Article 3(i) and (ii), as third installment
of the equity transfer price. Hence, the total additional payment is RMB 506,250.iv.
    
    In the event that the actual Net Profit is equal to or more than RMB
3,550,000 but less than RMB 3,850,000, Party B agree to pay an extra RMB 168,750, in
addition to the amount of RMB stated in Article 3(i), (ii) and (iii), as third
installment of the equity transfer price. Hence, the total additional payment is RMB
675,000.v.
    
    In the event that the actual Net Profit is equal to or more than RMB
3,850,000, Party B agree to pay an extra RMB 168,750, in addition to the amount of
RMB stated in Article 3(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv), as third installment of the equity
transfer
price. Hence, the total additional payment is RMB 843,750.




---



##### 








---



#####
Exhibit 32.2

GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY  RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Dennis J. O'Leary, acting in the capacity of Principal Financial Officer of GMH Communities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the "Company"),
hereby certify that, to my knowledge:



*    *    *

|/s/DENNIS J. O'LEARYDennis J. O'Leary
Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer) |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
July 31, 2006

---



QuickLinks
### §1722. Departmental distribution of publications

Government publications printed for or received by the executive departments, whether for official use or for distribution, except those required by section 1701 of this title to be distributed by the Director of the Government Publishing Office, shall be distributed by a competent person detailed to this duty in each department by the head of the department. He shall prevent duplication and make detailed report to the head of the department.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1282; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §96 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §92, 28 Stat. 623; May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(2), 45 Stat. 986).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
### ltiROP Ce410 4kilfeLjAM fiieiiLwi 0047364 te21 

### F5 

# 2f Rot ger

### 4 1424d41tiefiotied td kre 

# g Eb 636 

## II 

# 41 y Afe crgile 7 6

# Oi Scr 

### iiiij2 443

# VI

94y6 

## vtreAe44A X 141akad 51fluil1 

# WANAL LiK4 

### CAVA f

# leArt4J
41i la iZ F 1 0 x701c 

### 7 Idek JA 

# 63 175 

# r 7o x 1000 iozn4

fl

# 4 RFD

# x 76 k A 

### PI 01371177< 7o g

# V Iiillqqtr FC 

### R A B c 17 0 0524 x Iq 0011536 

# jLL 

# US40S i fte0 

# Lea x le5 c Y

# 70 4204 4 

### Fa 

## C36 X 

## 704400304 X 111 A

### WO T 

### L

ill 40 

### FD x 

### 64 scbo 

# yfek 

# I 7 A 

### av lif 

### L64q42r AligAlff56444cops1404 7 SyhtoreN 

### N 44 Isreigi1 t i 

## C6kaak6 

# Aioutkel 41411 i s6 

# taid ea i 

# 015 aLWVY I 

# hLC uslitriaLitutedSpi utotly mo 

# 4wkrm zukjkoiRiAida134
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 324

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 324 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, 

4 Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Arthur 

5 Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
2010 Employment Agreement Amendment





Pursuant to People’s Republic of China Labor Law,
People’s Republic of China Labor Contract Law and their rules promulgated thereunder, Party A and Party B hereby reach
agreement as follows:





| | I. | Party B agrees that Party A shall adjust Party B’s employment compensation and position according to Party B’s
performance and Party A’s operational needs.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | II. | To increase Party A’s cash flow and for future development, Party B agrees to reduce its compensation for the employment
as Chief Financial Officer of Shengtai Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the United States to $ 56,000. Party B is entitled to the compensation
of RMB 85,000 ($12,521) for the employment in China, totaling $68, 521.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | III. | This Amendment is a part of the Employment Agreement dated July 1, 2009 with same legal effect.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | IV. | This Amendment becomes effective upon execution and shall be made two copies. Each Party shall keep one copy.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Party A



Weifang Shengtai Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.



Date: June 30, 2010



Party B



Yongqiang Wang



Date: June 30, 2010
§ 574.200 Amounts available for competitive grants. ( a ) The Department will set aside 10 percent of the amounts appropriated under this program to fund on a competitive basis: ( 1 ) Special projects of national significance; and
( 2 ) Other projects submitted by States and localities that do not qualify for formula grants.
( b ) Any competitively awarded funds that become available as a result of deobligations or the imposition of sanctions, as provided in § 574.540, will be added to the funds available for competitive grants in the next fiscal year.
( c ) The competitive grants are awarded based on applications, as described in subpart C of this part, submitted in response to a Notice of Funding Availability published in the Federal Register. All States and units of general local government and nonprofit organizations are eligible to apply for competitive grants to fund projects of national significance. Only those States and units of general local government that do not qualify for formula allocations are eligible to apply for competitive grants to fund other projects.
( d ) If HUD makes a procedural error in a funding competition that, when corrected, would warrant funding of an otherwise eligible application, HUD will select that application for potential funding when sufficient funds become available.
[57 FR 61740, Dec. 28, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 7963, Feb. 29, 1996]
### §947. Map; damages to settlers

Any canal or ditch company desiring to secure the benefits of sections 946 to 949 of this title shall, within twelve months after the location of ten miles of its canal, if the same be upon surveyed lands, and if upon unsurveyed lands, within twelve months after the survey thereof by the United States, file with the officer, as the Secretary of the Interior may designate, of the land office for the district where such land is located a map of its canal or ditch and reservoir; and upon the approval thereof by the Secretary of the Interior the same shall be noted upon the plats in said office, and thereafter all such lands over which such rights of way shall pass shall be disposed of subject to such right of way. Whenever any person or corporation, in the construction of any canal, ditch, or reservoir, injures or damages the possession of any settler on the public domain, the party committing such injury or damage shall be liable to the party injured for such injury or damage.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §19, 26 Stat. 1102; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Officer, as the Secretary of the Interior may designate" substituted for "register" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, which abolished all registers of district land offices and transferred functions of register of district land office to Secretary of the Interior. See section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
§ 266.305 HFAs accepting less than 50 percent of risk. ( a ) *Underwriting standards.* The underwriting standards and loan terms and conditions of any HFA electing to take less than 50 percent of the risk on certain projects are subject to review, modification, and approval by HUD in accordance with § 266.100(b). These HFAs may assume 25 percent or 10 percent of the risk depending upon the loan-to-replacement-cost or loan-to-value ratios of the projects to be insured as specified in § 266.100(b)(2)(i) and (ii). Large loans, as defined by HUD for its insured multifamily mortgage programs, require prior approval by the Commissioner.
( b ) *HFA responsibilities.* The HFA is responsible for the performance of all functions except those HUD-retained functions specified in § 266.210 and 266.225(e). After acceptance of an application for a loan to be insured under this part, the HFA must: ( 1 ) Determine that a market for the project exists, taking into consideration any comments from the local HUD office relative to the potential adverse impact the project will have on existing or proposed Federally insured and assisted projects in the area;
( 2 ) Establish the maximum insurable mortgage, and review plans and specifications for compliance with HFA standards as approved by HUD;
( 3 ) Arrange for the performance of an environmental review in accordance with § 266.217;
( 4 ) Determine the acceptability of the proposed mortgagor and management agent;
( 5 ) Approve the Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan, required by § 266.215(a); and
( 6 ) Make any other determinations necessary to ensure acceptability of the proposed project.
( c ) *HUD-retained reviews.* After positive completion of the HUD-retained reviews specified in § 266.210(a) and (b), the local HUD office will issue a firm approval letter.
( d ) *Inspections and other reviews.* The HFA is responsible for inspections during construction, processing and approving advances of mortgage proceeds during construction, review and approval of cost certification, and closing of the loan.
( e ) *Endorsement of mortgage note for insurance.* So long as the HFA is in good standing, and absent fraud or material misrepresentation on the part of the HFA, the Commissioner or designee will endorse the mortgage note for insurance upon presentation by the HFA of the Closing Docket and certifications required in § 266.420(b), subject to HUD's right to adjust under § 266.417.
[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83443, Dec. 22, 2020]
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF SOLO CUP COMPANY

The following is a list of subsidiaries of Solo Cup Company, a Delaware corporation as of December 28,
2008.



|                                             |  |                                  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Name or Organization                         |  | State or Country of Incorporation
|                                             | 
|SF Holdings Group, Inc.                      |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Operating Corporation               |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Manufacturing LLC                       |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|S Credit Corporation                         |  | Illinois                         
|                                             | 
|P.R. Solo Cup, Inc.                          |  | Illinois                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Panama, S.A.                        |  | Panama                           
|                                             | 
|SC Management de Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                           
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup (Australia) Pty Limited             |  | Australia                        
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup (UK) Limited                        |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Insulpak Holdings Limited                    |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Europe Limited                      |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Lily-Canada Holding Corporation              |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Canada Inc.                         |  | Canada                           
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                |  | Mexico                           
|                                             | 
|Global Cup, S.A. de C.V.                     |  | Mexico
Summary of Comments Received and Responses 

Agenda Item 08-4-08 

Considered April 24, 2008 

Comment: The Board should adopt the SIP-based budgets because they 

reflect the control strategies contained in the approved South Coast plans 

for ozone and PM2.5, as well as the adopted State Strategy, because they 

are more protective of the public health.

Commenter: Dr. Barry Wallerstein, South Coast Air Quality Management District. 

Response: No response necessary. 

Comment: The attainment demonstration does not provide for attainment 

in communities adjacent to heavily traveled freeways. 

Commenter: Endangered Habitats League, Natural Resources Defense Council 

Response: The SIP demonstrates attainment of the standard at the regional 

level according to U.S. EPA guidance. Additionally, the Plan contains control 

measures which reduce emissions from directly emitted PM2.5 and its precursors 

at both the regional and local level. Ultimately this question related to SIP 

approvability rather than budget adequacy.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, William
M. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.




May
19, 2008


/s/
      William M. McKayWilliam
      M. McKayChief
      Financial Officer