alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2019-B15 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; and Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC.

Date:March 27, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Benchmark 2019-B15 Certifications
fs1a1ex4i_empireglobal.htm


Exhibit 4.1







SPECIMEN OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE







[________]NUMBER







SHARES[________]







AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK; 100,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA Common stock CUSIP THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF SHARES OF EMPIRE GLOBAL GAMING, INC.’S COMMON STOCK TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION IN PERSON OR BY DULY AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.







THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL COUNTERSIGNED BY THE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTERED BY THE REGISTRAR.







Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.







Dated:







[SEAL OF Empire Global Gaming, Inc.]







/s/ Nicholas M. Sorge


Nicholas M. Sorge, President







/s/ Dolores Marsh


Dolores Marsh, Secretary                                                                            














  





  











  











By:  Patrick Day


       American Registrar and Transfer Company


       Salt Lake City, UT 84107












This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.







NOTICE:  Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust company.







The following abbreviation, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:







TEN COM - as tenants in common


UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - ____Custodian____


TEN ENT- as tenants by the entireties


(Cust) (Minor) JT TEN - as joint tenants with right under Uniform Gifts to Minors of survivorship and not as Act


________________________ tenants in common.


   (State)







Additional abbreviation may also be used though not in above list.







FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE -


-------------------------------------------------------------


________________________________________________________


______  ___ _________ (Please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of assignee)


________________________________________________________ ______


_______________________________________________________________


______ ___  _________  Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ________________________________________________________  Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of


substitution in the premises.







Dated:







NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         449312
<SECURITIES>                                   163860
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1322435
<PP&E>                                         132860
<DEPRECIATION>                                 44539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1494601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    20
<COMMON>                                       43090
<OTHER-SE>                                     1335491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1494901
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1135893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               206924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1279468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1279468)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1279468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.15)



</TABLE>
Internet Marketing & Videography

JBS Media 1329 Hwy 395 N Ste 10-144, Gardnerville, NV 89410 775-544-3261

Drone Product Information

Drone: DJI Phantom 3 Pro

This drone is proven to be a safe and reliable. It has a 4K high resolution camera that will 

provide our customers with quality videos. It has built in safety features such as Home 

Safe, auto takeoff and landing, GPS with online updates and no fly zones, and if controller 

is disrupted or battery fails is auto returns to takeoff location. These features all 

contributed to our choice of this unit for safety and security reasons.

ID: P77DCG30017239

FCC ID: SS3-WH3231503

IC: 11805A-WH3231503

Model: W323

CE1313

FAA Registration # FA3MW3397F
|Exhibit 31.2
     CERTIFICATION                         
|--------------------------------------------------------
|I, Richard Blass, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
|1.                                                      
|2.                                                      
|3.                                                      
|4.                                                      
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|5.                                                      
|                                                        



---

| | (b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that
        involves management or other employees who have a significant role in
        the registrants internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 17, 2004
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | /s/ RICHARD BLASS           
| | ----------------------------
| |                             
| | Richard Blass               
| | Executive Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer     





---
### §9211. Encouragement and protection of small business

#### (a) Opportunities for participation in programs

In carrying out his functions under this chapter, the Secretary shall take steps to assure that small business concerns will have realistic and adequate opportunities to participate in the programs under this chapter to the maximum extent practicable.

#### (b) Protection of trade secrets and other proprietary information

The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, use all authority provided by law to protect trade secrets and other proprietary information submitted by small business under this chapter and to avoid the unnecessary disclosure of such information.

#### (c) Manufacture or sale of wind energy systems in compliance with antitrust laws; restriction against creation of noncompetitive market situations

The Secretary shall take such steps as may be necessary to assure compliance with the antitrust laws in the conduct of activities related to the manufacture or sale of wind energy systems directly or indirectly assisted under this chapter and shall implement this chapter in a manner which will protect against the creation of noncompetitive market situations in the conduct of such activities.

(Pub. L. 96–345, §12, Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1146.)
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc., the
“Company,” on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I, Hu
Ye, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         That
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
September 28, 2010


SHENGTAI
      PHARMACEUTICAL, INC./s/ Hu YeHu
      YeChief
      Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

 To Be Published.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

 Wednesday, December 2, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

 The Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 2, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. has been changed to Wednesday, December 2, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. The following additional matter will also be considered during the Closed Meeting:

    - Disclosure of non-public information

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 25, 2020.

Eduardo A. Aleman,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26550 Filed 11-27-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTONIO FIDDEMON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1212

[June 27, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-19551 CF10A.

Antonio Fiddemon, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §447. Relinquishment of homestead entry and making new entry

Any person who prior to March 4, 1915, made homestead entry under the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), for land believed to be susceptible of irrigation which at the time of said entry was withdrawn for any contemplated irrigation project, may relinquish the same, provided that it has since been determined that the land embraced in such entry or all thereof in excess of twenty acres is not or will not be irrigable under the project, and in lieu thereof may select and make entry for any farm unit included within such irrigation project as finally established, notwithstanding the provisions of sections 436 and 437 of this title: Provided, That such entrymen shall be given credit on the new entry for the time of bona fide residence maintained on the original entry.

(Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 182, 38 Stat. 1215.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
§ 60.108 IRB functions and operations. ( a ) In order to fulfill the requirements of this policy each IRB shall: ( 1 ) Have access to meeting space and sufficient staff to support the IRB's review and recordkeeping duties;
( 2 ) Prepare and maintain a current list of the IRB members identified by name; earned degrees; representative capacity; indications of experience such as board certifications or licenses sufficient to describe each member's chief anticipated contributions to IRB deliberations; and any employment or other relationship between each member and the institution, for example, full-time employee, part-time employee, member of governing panel or board, stockholder, paid or unpaid consultant;
( 3 ) Establish and follow written procedures for: ( i ) Conducting its initial and continuing review of research and for reporting its findings and actions to the investigator and the institution;
( ii ) Determining which projects require review more often than annually and which projects need verification from sources other than the investigators that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review; and
( iii ) Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and for ensuring that investigators will conduct the research activity in accordance with the terms of the IRB approval until any proposed changes have been reviewed and approved by the IRB, except when necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the subject.
( 4 ) Establish and follow written procedures for ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB; appropriate institutional officials; the department or agency head; and the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office, or the equivalent office within the appropriate Federal department or agency of ( i ) Any unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others or any serious or continuing noncompliance with this policy or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; and
( ii ) Any suspension or termination of IRB approval.
( b ) Except when an expedited review procedure is used (as described in § 60.110), an IRB must review proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRB are present, including at least one member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. In order for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of those members present at the meeting.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control Number 0990-0260)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MATTHEW CHARLES MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. DAVID TILLETT; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees. No. 16-17148 D.C. No. 3:15-cv-04044-VC
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding Subm itted March 16, 2018 * * San Francisco, California Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN, * * * District Judge. 

# FILED
MAR 21 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

* * The panel unanim ously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum e nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

* * * The Honorable Lynn S. Adelm an, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.Matthew Mitchell appeals the district court’s dism issal of his petition to

vacate an arbitral decision penalizing him for a rules violation during the 34th Am erica’s Cup. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because it is not possible for us “to grant ‘any effectual relief whatever’” to Mitchell, this case is m oot. K nox v. Serv. Emps. Int’l Union, Local 1000 , 567 U.S. 298, 307 (2012) (quoting Erie v. Pap’s A.M. , 529 U.S. 277, 287 (2000)). We are not able to grant Mitchell relief from the arbitral decision precluding him from participating in four races, because all such races were com pleted by the end of Septem ber 2013. Mitchell does not seek dam a ges and any harm to Mitchell’s reputation is “not a sufficient interest to avoid m ootness.” Jackson v. Cal. Dep’t of Mental Health , 399 F.3d 1069, 1075 (9th Cir. 2005). Nor would any claim for attorneys’ fees “resuscitate an otherwise m oot controversy.” C ammermeyer v. Perry , 97 F.3d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir. 1996). 1 AFFIRMED.

1 We deny Mitchell’s pending m otion for judicial notice of a law review article because “a court m ay not take judicial notice of a fact that is ‘subject to reasonable dispute’” and the law review article is a source whose accuracy m ay be debated and questioned. Lee v. City of Los Angeles , 250 F.3d 668, 689 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)). 2
#### RILEY, Respondent, v. TOWN OF CUBA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 27, 1903.)

Action by Michael Riley against the town of Cuba.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

d0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

137427(20) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137427 

 COA: 285856 

Wayne CC: 05-018392 

MATTHEW L. STREATER, 05-018394 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 24, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
### **CHAPTER 423—FOREIGN SHIPPING PRACTICES**

Sec.
42301.
Definitions.
42302.
Investigations.
42303.
Information requests.
42304.
Action against foreign carriers.
42305.
Refusal of clearance and entry.
42306.
Submission of determinations to President.
42307.
Review of regulations and orders.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 09-01550 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE REGARDING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS THIRD PARTY

COMPLAINT

This matter is set for a hearing on June 18, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. on the motion to dismiss

filed by Defendant SBM Atlantia, Inc. The opposition to this motion shall be filed by no later

than April 29, 2010 and the reply, if any, shall be filed by no later than May 6, 2010.

If the Court determines that this matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument,

it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this

schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed order

demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 15, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document 152 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Case3:09-cv-02883-JSW Document24-2 Filed02/12/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-02883-JSW Document 25 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 2
Case3:09-cv-02883-JSW Document24-2 Filed02/12/10 Page2 of 2

17

Case 3:09-cv-02883-JSW Document 25 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 599.503 Effect of Renewal Community designation on an EZ/EC.

The designation of any area as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community shall cease to be in effect as of the date that the designation of any portion of such area as a Renewal Community takes effect.