alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Metal Stampings Corporation, appellant, v. Ralph Houltram et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 7,170.

Bill to restrain from interfering with complainant’s business and picketing factory. Temporary injunction issued. Motion ,to dissolve. Injunction made permanent as to some defendants, dissolved as to others, who filed suggestion of damages. Damages allowed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. Stevens R. Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed September 7, 1923.

Rehearing denied October 9, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Arthur H. Shay and Boys, Osborn & Griggs, for appellant. James J. Conway, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 115.102 Public notices. ( a ) Periodically, the Assistant Secretary will publish the following public notices in the Federal Register: ( 1 ) A list of all interim and certified agencies; and
( 2 ) A list of agencies to which a withdrawal of interim certification or certification has been proposed.
( b ) On an annual basis, the Assistant Secretary may publish in the Federal Register a notice that identifies all agencies that have received interim certification during the prior year. The notice will invite the public to comment on the state and local laws of the new interim agencies, as well as on the performance of the agencies in enforcing their laws. All comments will be considered before a final decision on certification is made.
§ 578.63 Indirect costs. ( a ) *In general.* Continuum of Care funds may be used to pay indirect costs in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart E.
( b ) *Allocation.* Indirect costs may be allocated to each eligible activity as provided in this subpart, so long as that allocation is consistent with an indirect cost rate proposal developed in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart E.
( c ) *Expenditure limits.* The indirect costs charged to an activity subject to an expenditure limit under §§ 578.39, 578.41, and 578.59 must be added to the direct costs charged for that activity when determining the total costs subject to the expenditure limits.
[77 FR 45442, July 31, 2012, as amended at 80 FR 75939, Dec. 7, 2015]
#### The People of the State of New York v. William Leon Paul.

Motion granted to prosecute appeal on original papers, typewritten briefs, and Sam Levy, Esq., assigned as counsel. Memorandum: We consider this an application in *coram nobis.*
§ 241.1067 Maximum loan amount—loans insured in connection with a plan of action under subpart B of part 248 of this chapter. ( a ) The amount of the equity loan shall not exceed: ( 1 ) The amount of rehabilitation costs as determined under an approved plan of action and related charges; plus
( 2 ) The lesser of 70 percent of the extension preservation equity of the project; or
( 3 ) The amount the Commissioner determines can be supported by the project on the basis of an 8 percent return on extension preservation equity, assuming normal debt service coverage. To the extent practicable, equity loans shall have amortization provisions which will support the maximum loan amount authorized under this section.
( b ) The amount of the acquisition loan shall not exceed: ( 1 ) The amount of rehabilitation costs as determined under an approved plan of action and related charges; plus
( 2 ) Ninety-five percent of the transfer preservation equity of the project; and
( 3 ) If the purchaser is a priority purchaser, the loan may include any expenses associated with the acquisition, loan closing, and implementation of the plan of action, subject to the approval of the Commissioner.
[58 FR 37814, July 13, 1993]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                  Washington, D. C.  20549

                            FORM 15

 Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration under
     Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or Suspension of Duty to File Reports Under Sections 13 and 15(d)
           of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

             Commission File Number:    0-16285
                                       ---------

           Mid-Atlantic Centers Limited Partnership
   ------------------------------------------------------
   (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

   100 Light Street,  Baltimore, Maryland  21202  (410)539-0000
------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area
      code, of registrant's principal executive offices)

        Units of Assignee Limited Partnership Interest
   --------------------------------------------------------
   (Title of each class of securities covered by this Form)


                             None
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 (Titles of all other classes of securities for which a duty to
       file reports under section 13(a) or 15(d) remains)

     Please place an X in the box(es) to designate the appropriate
rule provision(s) relied upon to terminate or suspend the duty to
file reports:

    Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(i)   [X]    Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(ii)  [ ]
    Rule 12g-4(a)(1)(ii)  [ ]    Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(i)   [ ]
    Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(i)   [ ]    Rule 12h-3(b)(2)(ii)  [ ]
    Rule 12g-4(a)(2)(ii)  [ ]    Rule 15d-6            [ ]
    Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i)   [ ]

        Approximate number of holders of record as of the
             certification or notice date:    0
                                            -----


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, Mid-Atlantic Centers Limited Partnership has caused this
certification/notice to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
duly authorized persons.

Date: November 9, 1999   MID-ATLANTIC CENTERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
    	 ----------------
                         By:  Realty Capital IV Limited
                              Partnership, General Partner

                         By:  LMRC IV, Inc., General Partner


                         By:  /s/ Richard J. Himelfarb
    	                         -------------------------------
	                             Richard J. Himelfarb, President



	                        By:  FW Realty Limited Partnership,
	                             General Partner

	                        By:  FW Corporation, General Partner


                         By:  /s/ William J. Wolfe
    	                         -------------------------------
	                             William J. Wolfe, President
### §1916. Designation of libraries of accredited law schools as depository libraries

(a) Upon the request of any accredited law school, the Director of the Government Publishing Office shall designate the library of such law school as a depository library. The Director of the Government Publishing Office may not make such designation unless he determines that the library involved meets the requirements of this chapter, other than those requirements of the first undesignated paragraph of section 1909 of this title which relate to the location of such library.

(b) For purposes of this section, the term "accredited law school" means any law school which is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or association approved by the Commissioner of Education for such purpose or accredited by the highest appellate court of the State in which the law school is located.

(Added Pub. L. 95–261, §1, Apr. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 199; amended Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 95–261, §3, Apr. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 199, provided that: "The amendments made by this Act [enacting this section] shall take effect on October 1, 1978."

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Commissioner of Education transferred to Secretary of Education pursuant to section 3441(a)(1) of Title 20, Education.
### §567. Water rights for towns and cities; charges

The Secretary of the Interior shall, in accordance with the provisions of the reclamation Act, provide for water rights in amount he may deem necessary for the towns established as provided, in sections 561, 562 and 566 of this title, and may enter into contract with the proper authorities of such towns, and other towns or cities on or in the immediate vicinity of irrigation projects, which shall have a water right from the same source as that of said project for the delivery of such water supply to some convenient point, and for the payment into the reclamation fund of charges for the same to be paid by such towns or cities, which charges shall not be less nor upon terms more favorable than those fixed by the Secretary of the Interior for the irrigation project from which the water is taken.

(Apr. 16, 1906, ch. 1631, §4, 34 Stat. 116.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The reclamation Act, referred to in text, is identified in section 561 of this title as act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3241 

To reduce temporarily the duty on myclobutanil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on myclobutanil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MYCLOBUTANIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 myclobutanil) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1.9%’’ and inserting ‘‘3.0%’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 3241 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### XAVIER v. OLIVER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 11, 1903.)

1 Libel — Justification—Irritation by Plaintiff.

In an action for libel, the fact that plaintiff had written and published of defendant or of his newspaper some irritating matters does not justify the publication of a libel concerning plaintiff, and is not pleadable as a full defense.

3. Same — Partial Defense — Mitigation of Damages

Under Code Civ. Proc. § 536, providing that in actions for personal injury the defendant may prove facts, not amounting to a total defense, tending to mitigate or otherwise reduce plaintiff’s damages, if set forth in the answer, the defendant, in an action for libel, may allege that the plaintiff had written and published certain irritating matters of defendant or of his newspaper.

Appeal from special term, Westchester county.

Action by Henry F. Xavier against John W. Oliver and another. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to a defense and overruling a demurrer to a partial defense both parties appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before GOODRICH, P. J., and BARTLETT, WOODWARD, and HIRSCHBERG, JJ.

Roger M. Sherman, for plaintiff.

James M. Hunt, for defendants.

WOODWARD, J.

This is an action for libel. The plaintiff states a cause of action, and the defendants have answered, setting up a defense and a separate and partial defense. To both of these the plaintiff interposes a demurrer. The learned court at special term holds, and properly, we believe, that the matter pleaded as a defense does not in law constitute a defense to the action. The same matter is pleaded as a partial defense, and the court holds that this does contain facts which may be proved in mitigation of damages, under the provisions of section 536 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and overruled the demurrer to the partial defense. Both parties appeal from the interlocutory judgment, the plaintiff urging that both demurrers should have been sustained, the defendants that neither of them should receive the sanction of the court.

The justification in an action for libel must be as broad as the charges (Young v. Fox, 26 App. Div. 261, 267, 49 N. Y. Supp. 634, and authority there cited); and the fact that the plaintiff in this action is alleged to have written and published of the defendant or his newspaper some irritating matters does not, as a matter of law, justify the defendants in publishing a libel concerning the plaintiff. It is, however, proper that these matters should, if pleaded, be placed before the jury in mitigation of damages. Section 536, Code Civ. Proc. The defendants have pleaded the facts surrounding the publication of .the alleged libel in mitigation of damages, and they are entitled to an opportunity to prove them upon the trial. The interlocutory judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, without costs. All concur.

¶

 2. See Libel and Slander, vol. 32, Cent. Dig. § 164.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report
of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey O. Nyweide, Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





February
      15, 2011
            
            /s/
      Jeffrey O. NyweideName:
            Jeffrey
      O. NyweideTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer, Executive Vice President – Corporate Development, and
      Secretary
              (Principal
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer)
### §423a. Construction charges on permanently unproductive lands already paid; disposition

The construction charges prior to May 25, 1926, paid on permanently unproductive lands excluded from the project shall be applied as a credit on charges due or to become due on any remaining irrigable land covered by the same water-right contract or land taken in exchange as provided in section 423c of this title. If the charges so paid exceed the amount of all water-right charges due and unpaid, plus the construction charges not yet due, the balance shall be paid in cash to the holder of the water-right contract covering the land so excluded or to the irrigation district affected; which in turn shall be charged with the responsibility of making suitable adjustment with the landowners involved. Should all the irrigable lands of a water-right applicant be excluded from the project as permanently unproductive, and no exchange be made as provided in said section, the total construction charges paid before May 25, 1926, less any accrued charges on account of operation and maintenance, shall be refunded in cash, the water-right contract shall be canceled, and all liens on account of water-right charges shall be released.

(May 25, 1926, ch. 383, §42, 44 Stat. 647.)
### §§921 to 929. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 921, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §1, 46 Stat. 41, related to forfeiture of any and all lands within indemnity limits of land grants to the Northern Pacific Railroad.

Section 922, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §2, 46 Stat. 42, related to forfeiture of all unsatisfied indemnity selection rights.

Section 923, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §3, 46 Stat. 42, related to effect of provisions of this chapter on various prior statutory provisions affecting the railroad.

Section 924, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §4, 46 Stat. 42, related to effect of provisions of this chapter on title to rights of way actually in use by railroad.

Section 925, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §5, 46 Stat. 42, authorized Attorney General to institute and prosecute all suits affecting title to lands.

Section 926, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §6, 46 Stat. 43, related to restitution by railroads of lands which were not earned or erroneously credited.

Section 927, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §7, 46 Stat. 43, related to jurisdiction of suits.

Section 928, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §8, 46 Stat. 44, related to reports and recommendations to Congress concerning final determinations in such actions.

Section 929, act June 25, 1929, ch. 41, §9, 46 Stat. 44, related to withholding of approval of adjustments of land grants pending final determination of actions.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00090-CR

SCOTT EVERETT SHINE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Franklin County, Texas

Trial Court No. F-9065

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Scott Everett Shine appeals from three conviction of engaging in organized criminal 

activity with the underlying offense of delivery of a controlled substance. Shine has filed a single 

brief in which he raises an issue common to each of his appeals.1 He argues that the trial court 

erred in limiting his cross-examination of one of the State’s law enforcement witnesses.

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Shine’s appeal in cause 

number 06-16-00088-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not 

been shown in this case. 

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 22, 2016

Date Decided: October 18, 2016

Do Not Publish

 

1Shine likewise appeals from his convictions in cause numbers 06-16-00088-CR and 06-16-00089-CR.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF SOLO CUP COMPANY

The following is a list of subsidiaries of Solo Cup Company, a
Delaware corporation as of December 26, 2010.



|                                             |  |                                  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|Name or Organization                         |  | State or Country of Incorporation
|                                             | 
|SF Holdings Group, Inc.                      |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Operating Corporation               |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Lily-Canada Holding Corporation              |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Canada Inc.                         |  | Canada                           
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Finance Limited                     |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Owings Mills Holdings               |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Manufacturing LLC                       |  | Delaware                         
|                                             | 
|P.R. Solo Cup, Inc.                          |  | Illinois                         
|                                             | 
|S Credit Corporation                         |  | Illinois                         
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup (UK) Limited                        |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Insulpak Holdings Limited                    |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Europe Limited                      |  | England and Wales                
|                                             | 
|Global Cup, S.A. de C.V.                     |  | Mexico                           
|                                             | 
|SC Management de Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                           
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                |  | Mexico                           
|                                             | 
|Solo Cup Panama, S.A.                        |  | Panama
### §1119. Government publications as public property

Government publications of a permanent nature furnished by authority of law to officers other than Members of Congress of the United States Government, for their official use, shall be stamped "Property of the United States Government," and shall be preserved by them and delivered to their successors in office as a part of the property of the office.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1264.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §92 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §74, 28 Stat. 620; June 20, 1936, ch. 630, title VII, §11, 49 Stat. 1552; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–679, §8, 76 Stat. 355).

This section incorporates only the first sentence of former section 92. The balance will be found in section 1911 of the revision.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 9, 2019

No. 04-18-00701-CR

Serge L. HIDEN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR10972

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 4, 2019. The appellant’s 

first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to April 

3, 2019. On April 3, 2019, appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to 

file the brief until May 3, 2019, for a total extension of sixty days. The motion is GRANTED. 

THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE 

GRANTED. The Appellant’s brief must be filed by May 3, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of April, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### §11202. Qualified service

For purposes of this chapter, an individual shall be considered to have engaged in qualified service if, between August 16, 1945, and December 31, 1946, the individual—

(1) was a member of the United States merchant marine (including the Army Transport Service and the Naval Transport Service) serving as a crewmember of a vessel that was—

(A) operated by the War Shipping Administration or the Office of Defense Transportation (or an agent of the Administration or Office);

(B) operated in waters other than inland waters, the Great Lakes, and other lakes, bays, and harbors of the United States;

(C) under contract or charter to, or property of, the Government of the United States; and

(D) serving the Armed Forces; and

(2) while so serving, was licensed or otherwise documented for service as a crewmember of such a vessel by an officer or employee of the United States authorized to license or document the individual for such service.

(Added Pub. L. 105–368, title IV, §402(a), Nov. 11, 1998, 112 Stat. 3336; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(b)(12), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4752.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "an individual" for "a person" in introductory provisions and "the individual" for "the person" in introductory provisions and in par. (2).