alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13
- 20
- 00 318
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ RAYMOND TRENT PETEREK , Appellant ,

v.
STANLEY OEHLKE , Appellee

.

_

___________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 13 5th District Court of Goliad County, Texas.

_

___________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
Appellant, Raymond Trent Peterek , attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 135th Judicial District of Goliad County, Texas, in cause number

18

- 02

- 0644

- CV
, on January 9, 2020

. The notice of appeal was filed in this matter on July
20, 2020, nearly six month s after the judgment

.2 A court of appeals may only entertain a motion to extend the deadline to timely file a notice of appeal within a 15

- day grace period

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26. 3

. The times for filing a notice of appeal are jurisdictional, and absent a timely filed notice of appeal or an
extension request, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 25.1(b),
26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 19 97) (holding that once extension
period has passed, a party can no longer invoke an appellate court's jurisdiction ).
Accordingly , the motion for leave to file notice of appeal is hereby DE NIED.
Furthermore, t he Court, having examined and fully consider ed the documents on file and
appellant ’ s failure to timely perfect his appeal and failure to timely file a motion for

extension , is of the opinion the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

JAIME TIJERINA Justice

D elivered and filed the 19th day of November , 2020

.
#### Albert Opoliner et al., as Stockholders-Lessees of Joint Queensview Housing Enterprise, Inc., Respondents, v. Joint Queensview Housing Enterprise, Inc., Appellant.

— In an action for a declaratory judgment and incidental relief, brought by stockholder-tenants in a co-operative housing development against its corporate owner and operator, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 27, 1960, as denies its cross motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice dismissing the complaint, and as grants planitiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction restraining defendant: (a) from interfering with plaintiffs’ possession of washing machines in their apartments; (b) from terminating their leases because of their possession of the washing machines; and (e) from instituting summary proceedings against them because of their possession of such machines. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, a question of fact exists with respect to the reasonableness of the defendant’s rule prohibiting entirely the use or possession of washing machines in plaintiffs’ apartments, especially since such rule was adopted some tune after defendant had permitted washing machines to he purchased, installed and used by, a number of its other tenants in the same housing development (cf. *Thousand Is. Park Assn.*v. *Tucker,*173 X. Y. 203, 212, 213). Under the circumstances disclosed, we believe it was a proper exercise of discretion to grant the temporary injunction (cf. *Schuehle*v. *Reiman,*86 X. Y. 270). Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur. •
#### Frank S. Puccio, Appellant, v Melvin Weill et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover moneys due and owing by virtue of personal guarantees of a corporate debt, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated June 7, 1977, which, *inter alia,*denied his motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Assuming, *arguendo,*the truth of defendants’ allegation that the instant indebtedness, although contracted in the form of a corporate loan, was intended to finance their *individual*obligations, the further representation that it was so contracted to provide funding to pay taxes on real estate owned by them and other obligations "so that we [defendants] could *[sic]*not be forced to sell the real estate at depressed prices and could hold the same until the market revived” establishes a bona fide business purpose for the loan, rendering their attempted reliance on a usury defense unavailing (see *Schneider v Phelps,*41 NY2d 238). No triable issues of fact having been raised, the motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 37—ADVERTISEMENTS BY GOVERNMENT AGENCIES**

Sec.
3701.
Advertisements for contracts in District of Columbia.
3702.
Advertisements not to be published without written authority.
3703.
Rate of payment for advertisements, notices, and proposals.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

September 30, 2016 

Dustin Fife, San Juan County Library Director 

Blanding Library, San Juan County 

25 West 300 South 

Blanding, UT 84511 

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Blanding Library for public inspection 

Dear Mr. Fife: 

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Blanding Library retain the enclosed package at 

the library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. The package consists of documents 

related to the United States Environmental Protection Agency's final decision on the Clean Air 

Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration amendment permit for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil 

Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation near the city of Aneth, San Juan 

County, Utah. 

We would greatly appreciate your assistance for making these documents available to the general 

public. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or r9airpermits@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Enclosure 

� 

Shaheerah Kelly 

Environmental Engineer 

Permits Office, Air Division
#### In re Estate of Winfield Scott Thurber, deceased. Trustees of the estate Charles A. Chapin, deceased, appellants, v. Chicago Title & Trust Company, administrator de bonis non of the estate of Winfield Scott Thurber, deceased, appellee.

Gen. No. 27,974.

Claim for rental as an expense of administration. Petition dismissed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

Tenney, Harding & Sherman, for appellants. Bangs *&*Frankhauser and Judah, Willard, Wolf *So*Reiehmann, for appellee; Arthur M. Cox, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 35.900 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose and applicability.* ( 1 ) The purpose of this subpart J is to establish procedures to eliminate as far as practicable lead-based paint hazards in a residential property that receives Federal rehabilitation assistance under a program administered by HUD. Rehabilitation assistance does not include project-based rental assistance, rehabilitation mortgage insurance or assistance to public housing.
( 2 ) The requirements of this subpart shall not apply to HOME funds which are committed to a specific project in accordance with § 92.2 of this title before September 15, 2000. Such projects shall be subject to the requirements of § 92.355 of this title that were in effect at the time of project commitment or the requirements of this subpart.
( 3 ) For the purposes of the Indian Housing Block Grant program and the CDBG Entitlement program, the requirements of this subpart shall apply to all residential rehabilitation activities (except those otherwise exempted) for which funds are first obligated on or after September 15, 2000. For the purposes of the State, HUD-Administered Small Cities, and Insular Areas CDBG programs, the requirements of this subpart shall apply to all covered activities (except those otherwise exempted) for which grant funding is awarded to the unit of local government by the State or HUD, as applicable, on or after September 15, 2000. For the purposes of the Emergency Shelter Grant Program (42 U.S.C. 11371-11378) and the formula grants awarded under the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program (HOPWA) (42 U.S.C. 12901 *et. seq.*), the requirements of this subpart shall apply to activities for which program funds are first obligated on or after September 15, 2000.
( 4 ) For the purposes of competitively awarded grants under the HOPWA Program and the Supportive Housing Program (42 U.S.C. 11481-11389), the requirements of this subpart shall apply to grants awarded under Notices of Funding Availability published on or after September 15, 2000.
( 5 ) For the purposes of the Indian CDBG program (§ 1003.607 of this title), the requirements of this subpart shall not apply to funds whose notice of funding availability is announced or funding letter is sent before September 15, 2000. Such project grantees shall be subject to the regulations in effect at the time of announcement or funding letter.
( b ) The grantee or participating jurisdiction may assign to a subrecipient or other entity the responsibilities set forth in this subpart.
#### § 1000.130 May a recipient charge a non low-income family rents or homebuyer payments which are more than 30 percent of the family's adjusted income?

Yes. A recipient may charge a non low-income family rents or homebuyer payments which are more than 30 percent of the family's adjusted income.
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Series 25-2004 (B) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                             |
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unifrax Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.


Date: August 13, 2002
                                      /s/ William P. Kelly
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     William P. Kelly
                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                     /s/ Mark D. Roos
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Mark D. Roos
                                     Chief Financial Officer



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEMA, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,    v.

WILLIAM KOPERWHATS, et al.,

Defendants,                                                                     /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.                                                                      /

No. C-09-1587 MMC

ORDER VACATING JANUARY 29, 2010HEARING ON COUNTERCLAIMDEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISSAND TO STRIKE COUNTERCLAIMPLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDEDANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS 

Before the Court is counterclaim defendant KEMA, Inc., counterclaim defendant

RLW Analytics, Inc., and counterclaim defendant Curt Puckett’s (collectively “Counterclaim

Defendants”) joint Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike First Amended Counterclaims,

filed October 29, 2009.  Counterclaim plaintiff William Koperwhats (“Koperwhats”) have

filed opposition, to which Counterclaim Defendants have replied.  Having read and

considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems

the matter suitable for decision thereon, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for January

29, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2010                                                             MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01587-MMC   Document 111   Filed 01/27/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T17:27:53-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained
in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MISCOR Group, Ltd.




Date: April 15, 2010.







/s/ John A. MartellJohn A. MartellChief Executive Officer/s/ Michael D. TopaMichael D. TopaInterim Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         167834
<SECURITIES>                                   559014
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1409211
<PP&E>                                         132860
<DEPRECIATION>                                 35845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1538961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          92000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    30
<COMMON>                                       42735
<OTHER-SE>                                     1404196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1538961
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  812314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (796783)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (796783)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (796783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
§ 26.35 Disqualification of ALJ. ( a ) An ALJ in a particular case may disqualify himself or herself.
( b ) A party may file with the ALJ a motion for the ALJ's disqualification. The motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit alleging the grounds for disqualification.
( c ) Upon the filing of a motion and affidavit, the ALJ shall proceed no further in the case until the matter of disqualification is resolved.
( d ) If the ALJ does not withdraw from the proceedings, a written statement of his or her reasons for electing not to withdraw shall be incorporated into the record and the hearing shall proceed.
Fontanella and Babitts
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS                       534 Union Boulevard
                                                   Totowa Boro, New Jersey 07512
                                                   Tel: (973) 595-5300
                                                   Fax: (973) 595-5890







            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No.  333-119839)  of our report,  dated December 16,
2004,  on the  consolidated  financial  statements of Roebling  Financial  Corp,
Inc.(the "Registrant") at and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 which
report is incorporated by reference into the Registrant's  Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.


                                        /s/ Fontanella and Babitts


December 23, 2004
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 8, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00468-CV

FUAD COCHINWALA, Appellant

V.

MUHAMMAD SALIM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-68927

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 25, 2022. On August 30, 

2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 

and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  

INverso Corp.

Date: August 18, 2005 

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 4.1

    

    

    

    

    OHIO VALLEY BANC CORP.

    420 Third Avenue

    Gallipolis, OH  45631

    (740) 446-2631

    

    

    November 14, 2022

    

    

    Securities and Exchange Commission

    100 F Street, N.E.

    Washington, D.C.  20549

    

    

    RE: Ohio Valley Banc Corp. – Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2022

    

    

    Gentlemen:

    

    

    Ohio Valley Banc Corp., an Ohio corporation (“Ohio Valley”), is today filing a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 (the
      “Form 10-Q”), as executed on November 14, 2022.

    

    

    Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Ohio Valley hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon
      request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-Q.  No such instrument or agreement
      represents long-term debt exceeding 10% of the total assets of Ohio Valley and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

    

    

    

    

    Very truly yours,

    

    

    	
            /s/Larry E. Miller, II

          
	
            Larry E. Miller, II

          
	
            President and Chief Executive Officer

          
	
            Ohio Valley Banc Corp.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Eastern Light Capital, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Wrensen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and I, Andrea Barney, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)The Report fully compiles with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: November 29, 2010
 /s/ Richard J. Wrensen
 Richard J. Wrensen
 President, Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 /s/ Andrea Barney
 Andrea Barney
 Principal Accounting Officer and Controller