alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthome Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901 June 23, 2010

The Honorable William R. Rhodes Gila River Indian Community P.O. Box 97 Sacaton, AZ 85147 Dear Governor Rhodes: I am writing on behalfofAdministrator Lisa Jackson, who has asked me to respond to your May 27, 2010 letter regarding the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) consultation and redesignation process for the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for coarse particulate matter (PM IO). I would like to reiterate EPA'scommitment, contained in Regional AdministratorJared Blumenfeld's April 30, 2010 letter, to resolvingthe exceptional events flags and completing formal consultation priorto determining ifit is appropriate to redesignate GRIC lands as nonattainment for the PM 10 NAAQS. Our commitmenthas been demonstratedby providing GRIC with more than $70,000 in additional Clean Air Act funding to hire an independent contractorto providetechnical support for the exceptional event flags, and by scheduling formal consultation with the GRIC Natural Resources Council and Tribal Council. Region 9 is also continuing its discussions with EPA Headquarters regarding the importanceyou place on recognizing the boundary ofGRIC in the context ofairquality designations. We value the ongoingdiscussions that are takingplace between GRIC and EPA staff, and look forward to discussing these issues with GRIC'sNatural Resources Council and Tribal Council when we meet for formal consultation on August 10 and 18,2010. Please contact me at (415) 947-8715 or ColleenMcKaughan at (520) 498-0118 ifyou have any questions. Sincerely,

Deborah Jordan, Director Air Division

cc: MargaretCook, Environmental Director

Printed on RecycledPaper
### SERVED : DECEMBE R28 , 201 1 

### V:PARTMENTOF 'I^ANSFORTATiO N U.S . DEPARTMBN T O FTRANSPORTATION:r;/r: f npCQvKl^ ^ OFFIC EO FHEARING S ^ --"- ! ^^taFlOhi o • WASHINGTORD C M l M ~ U A tQ : Ob I N THEMATTERO F M& M TANKS , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B EASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-2011-I1I 8
NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 20IOWP7000IO ) ha s been assigne d t o Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shall b e serve do n the Judge , th e FA

A Hearin g Docket , andthe othe r

person s o

n th e attache dServic e List .

Lonni e A . Yode r "Chie f Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tfjDMSNo . FAA-20I I (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1OOO '

ON ECOP Y Stanfor dM.J . Manuia , Responc/cn f ' s Counse l 70 1 Bisho p Stree t Honolulu , HI 9681 3 TEL : 808-532-454 3 FAX : 808-532-470 4 M& M Tanks , Inc. , Respomien l ATTN : Michae l Weitzenhof f 103 6 Mikol e Stree t Honolulu , HI 9681 9 Christophe r

Merrill , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AWP-7. 3 Western-Pacifi c Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-710 5 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Adminisiraliv e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 . TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier, us

e th e foilowin g address : Federa l Avialio n Adminislration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Allenlion : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 . 

### - 2 -
§ 91.310 Housing market analysis. ( a ) *General characteristics.* ( 1 ) Based on data available to the State, the plan must describe the significant characteristics of the State's housing markets (including such aspects as the supply, demand, and condition and cost of housing).
( 2 ) Commencing with consolidated plans submitted on or after January 1, 2018, the State must describe the broadband needs of housing in the State based on an analysis of data identified by the State. These needs include the need for broadband wiring and for connection to the broadband service in the household units, the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
( 3 ) Commencing with consolidated plans submitted on or after January 1, 2018, the State must also describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate-income households to increased natural hazard risks due to climate change based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods identified by the State in its consolidated plan.
( b ) *Facilities, housing, and services for homeless persons.* The plan must include a brief inventory of facilities and services that meet the needs of homeless persons within the state, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. ( 1 ) The inventory of facilities and housing (*e.g.,* emergency shelter, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing) must be presented in a form specified by HUD.
( 2 ) The inventory of services must include both services targeted to homeless persons and mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and employment services to the extent those services are used to complement services targeted to homeless persons.
( c ) *Special need facilities and services.* The plan must describe, to the extent information is available, the facilities and services that assist persons who are not homeless but who require supportive housing, and programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing.
( d ) *Barriers to affordable housing.* The plan must explain whether the cost of housing or the incentives to develop, maintain, or improve affordable housing in the State are affected by its policies, including tax policies affecting land and other property, land use controls, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limits, and policies that affect the return on residential investment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2506-0117) [60 FR 1896, Jan. 5, 1995; 60 FR 4861, Jan. 25, 1995, as amended at 71 FR 6967, Feb. 9, 2006; 76 FR 75971, Dec. 5, 2011; 81 FR 91012, Dec. 16, 2016]
§ 581.8 Public notice of determination. ( a ) No later than 15 days after the last 45 day period has elapsed for receiving responses from the landholding agencies regarding availability, HUD will publish in the Federal Register a list of all properties reviewed, including a description of the property, its address, and classification. The following designations will be made: ( 1 ) Properties that are suitable and available.
( 2 ) Properties that are suitable and unavailable.
( 3 ) Properties that are suitable and to be declared excess.
( 4 ) Properties that are unsuitable.
( b ) Information about specific properties can be obtained by contacting HUD at the following toll free number, 1-800-927-7588.
( c ) HUD will transmit to the ICH a copy of the list of all properties published in the Federal Register. The ICH will immediately distribute to all state and regional homeless coordinators area-relevant portions of the list. The ICH will encourage the state and regional homeless coordinators to disseminate this information widely.
( d ) No later than February 15 of each year, HUD shall publish in the Federal Register a list of all properties reported pursuant to § 581.3(b).
( e ) HUD shall publish an annual list of properties determined suitable but which agencies reported unavailable including the reasons such properties are not available.
( f ) Copies of the lists published in the Federal Register will be available for review by the public in the HUD headquarters building library (room 8141); area-relevant portions of the lists will be available in the HUD regional offices and in major field offices.
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### § 5.327 Nuisance or threat to health or safety.

Nothing in this subpart C prohibits a project owner, PHA, or an appropriate community authority from requiring the removal of any pet from a project, if the pet's conduct or condition is duly determined to constitute, under the provisions of State or local law, a nuisance or a threat to the health or safety of other occupants of the project or of other persons in the community where the project is located.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFREDO LEON OREA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

FS SAN FRANCISCO EMPLOYMENT,

INC.’S LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant. /

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

NORTH AMERICA,

Real Party in Interest. /

No. C 09-02538 WHA

ORDER RE NOTICE

OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff’s counsel has filed a notice that the parties have reached a settlement in this

matter and anticipate filing a stipulation for dismissal within the next 30 days. All deadlines

need to be honored until a dismissal is filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02538-WHA Document 43 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1
### **CHAPTER 534—TANKER SECURITY FLEET**

Sec. 1

53401.
Definitions.
53402.
Establishment of the Tanker Security Fleet.
53403.
Award of operating agreements.
53404.
Effectiveness of operating agreements.
53405.
Obligations and rights under operating agreements.
53406.
Payments.
53407.
National security requirements.
53408.
Regulatory relief.
53409.
Special rule regarding age of participating Fleet vessels.
53410.
Regulations.
53411.
Authorization of appropriations.
53412.
Acquisition of Fleet vessels.

1  Editorially supplied.
§ 58.76 Procedure for objections. A person or agency objecting to a responsible entity's RROF and certification shall submit objections in writing to HUD (or the State). The objections shall: ( a ) Include the name, address and telephone number of the person or agency submitting the objection, and be signed by the person or authorized official of an agency.
( b ) Be dated when signed.
( c ) Describe the basis for objection and the facts or legal authority supporting the objection.
( d ) State when a copy of the objection was mailed or delivered to the responsible entity's Certifying Officer.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of The Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Betsy Z. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    BETSY Z. COHENDated:  February 23, 2011



Betsy Z. CohenChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2

          CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
        OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   I, Richard Blass,  Executive Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of
Delta  Financial  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:

1. The  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
   31, 2003 fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have executed this  Certification  this 15th day of May,
2003.


                                    /s/RICHARD BLASS
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Richard Blass
                                    EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
                                    CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai
Pharmaceutical, Inc., the “Company,” on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the “Report,” I, Qingtai Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.       That
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date: April  9, 2012



| | SHENGTAI PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | /s/ Qingtai Liu              
| | Qingtai Liu                  
| | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JCC
HOLDING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,193)
<INVENTORY>                                        705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,884
<PP&E>                                         359,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,389)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,840
<BONDS>                                        384,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,615)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   480,449
<SALES>                                         11,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               196,855
<CGS>                                           14,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (98,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,230)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (9.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.67)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Wellington Sears Company Incorporated, Respondent, and Nova Fabrics Corporation, Appellant.

Order entered on July 22, 1960, granting petitioner-respondent’s motion to stay, pending arbitration, an action brought by respondent-appellant against petitioner-respondent in the Municipal Court of the City of New York, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent. No opinion. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 683 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

On May 5, 2010, proponents moved to supplement the record

with documents produced by various No on 8 groups pursuant to the

court’s March 5 (Doc #610) and March 22 (Doc #623) orders. Doc

#655. Proponents’ motion was updated on June 2, 2010 to reflect

completed negotiations with the No on 8 groups surrounding the

confidentiality of certain exhibits. Doc #673. Proponents’ motion

argues the relevance of each exhibit proponents seek to have

included in the record. See Doc #673-4. 

Plaintiffs object that the exhibits proponents seek to

admit are “hearsay, irrelevant, and untimely.” Doc #665 at 2. 

Plaintiffs do not however object to the court taking judicial

notice of the exhibits. Id.

Because proponents seek to admit documents without a

sponsoring witness, and because plaintiffs do not object, the court

finds it appropriate to take judicial notice of the 129 exhibits

listed in Doc #673-1. The 129 exhibits will therefore be included

in the record as documents subject to judicial notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 683 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-23;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005      By:  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale  Name:  Ellen Z. Lamale Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
###### Editorial Note on Part 761

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 761 appear at 64 FR 49917, Sept. 14, 1999.

#### § 761.5 Public housing; encouragement of resident participation.

For the purposes of the Public Housing Drug Elimination Program, the elimination of drug-related and violent crime within public housing developments requires the active involvement and commitment of public housing residents and their organizations. To enhance the ability of PHAs to combat drug-related and violent crime within their developments, Resident Councils (RCs), Resident Management Corporations (RMCs), and Resident Organizations (ROs) will be permitted to undertake management functions specified in this part, notwithstanding the otherwise applicable requirements of part 964 of this title.

[64 FR 49917, Sept. 14, 1999]
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, Cross

- Appellant

______________________

2020

- 1587, 2020

- 1588, 2020

- 1654

______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2018

- 01152, IPR2018

- 01153.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

I SRAEL S ASHA M AYERGOYZ , Jones Day, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by R OBERT B REETZ , D AVID B. C OCHRAN , D AVID M ICHAEL M AIORANA , J OSEPH M. S AUER , Cleveland, OH; M ATTHEW J OHNSON , J OSHUA R. N IGHTINGALE , Pittsburgh, PA; J ENNIFER L. S WIZE , Washington, DC.

J AMES M URPHY D OWD , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for cross

- appellant. Case: 20-1587 Document: 99 Page: 1 Filed: 10/13/2021Also represented by D AVID L ANGDON C AVANAUGH , Washington, DC ; K ELLI P OWELL , Boston, MA

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , T ARANTO , and H UGHES , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 13, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 20-1587 Document: 99 Page: 2 Filed: 10/13/2021