alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00218

- CR

Larry Craig Madore

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1527527R)

July 19, 2018

Opinion by J ustice Birdwell

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Wade Birdwell

_________________ Justice Wade Birdwell
### §30918. Reports

The Secretary of each department of the United States Government, and the board of trustees of each federally-owned corporation, shall report to Congress at each session thereof all arbitration awards and settlements agreed to under this chapter since the previous session, for which the time to appeal has expired or been waived.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1521.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30918 | 46 App.:752. | Mar. 9, 1920, ch. 95, §12, 41 Stat. 528; Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1076, §1(26), 68 Stat. 968; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(25)(E), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 155. |

Section
### §390h–12n. Treatment of effluent from sanitation districts of Los Angeles County through city of Long Beach

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, the Orange County Water District in the State of California, and other appropriate authorities, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of water reclamation and reuse projects to treat approximately 10,000 acre-feet per year of effluent from the sanitation districts of Los Angeles County through the city of Long Beach.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation or maintenance of a project described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1628, as added Pub. L. 104–266, §2(a)(2), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3293.)
# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 

### 2023 KW 0486 VERSUS JEREMIAH GRISBY 

### JULY 5, 2023

In Re: Jeremiah 

## Grisby, applying for supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 11- 17-0041.
BEFORE: LANIER, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Relator should seek enforcement 

### from the 

### court that issued the order. WIL CHH CMM
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-20372 Summary Calendar

EARNEST KING,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas

H-95-CV-1616

November 26, 1997

Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

A Texas jury found Earnest King guilty of possession of

cocaine. After exhausting his state remedies, King unsuccessfully

sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. King appeals. He contends

t hat the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction.

Specifically, he argues that the evidence is insufficient to show

that he knowingly possessed cocaine. We have reviewed the record2 See Peters v. Whitley , 942 F.2d 937, 941 (5th Cir. 1991).

2 and the briefs of the parties, and find sufficient evidence to

support the conviction.

An officer of the Houston Police Department was dispatched to

an apartment complex in response to a citizen complaint regarding

drug trafficking in the area. Upon his arrival, he encountered

King, who at that time was staggering and incoherent. King’s eyes

were glazed and his speech was slurred. The officer arrested King

for public intoxication. During a post-arrest search of King’s

person, the officer found a crack pipe, still damp, in a pocket of

King’s t rousers. The receptacle contained a residue that was

visible to the naked eye. The officer conducted a field test on

the residue found in the pipe, and it tested positive for cocaine.

Four tests subsequently performed by a po lice chemist showed the

positive presence of cocaine within the residue. In sum, the

amount of cocaine was too small to be measured, but it was apparent

to the naked eye and sufficient for scientific tests to confirm

that the residue was cocaine.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a

rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of

the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. 2

AFFIRMED.
05/2014

Nutrition and Cancer-Related Fatigue

What is fatigue?

Fatigue is usually described as lacking energy and feeling weak, exhausted or 

tired. General fatigue with cancer can be caused by a number of problems, 

including:

 The cancer itself

 Cancer treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, bone 

marrow transplant or surgery

 Side effects of treatment such as anemia, nausea, vomiting, pain, 

insomnia and mood changes

 Emotions such as anxiety or depression

 Medications, particularly pain relievers

 Poor nutrition

 Lack of exercise

Fatigue should be discussed with your doctor. Don’t keep it a secret. Some 

causes of fatigue can be improved by lifestyle changes or medical interventions.

One way to decrease fatigue is through a healthy diet. When a person has cancer, 

changes can occur in the body that alter the need for and ability to process 

nutrients. These changes can lead to poor nutrition and can result in fatigue. 

Some changes in diet may be helpful to combat these changes.

Nutrition Tips for Decreasing Fatigue

 Try to eat 4 to 6 small meals per day

 Prepare easy to chew foods

 Include high protein foods at every meal to help improve immunity. 

Examples include:

o Eggs, meat, beans, milk and dairy products, soy, peanut butter

 Include iron-rich foods at that will help with anemia, including:

o Egg yolks, lean meats, liver, whole grain breads and cereals

 Include vitamin C foods to help your body absorb iron, including:

o Citrus fruits, bananas, avocados, peaches, melons, strawberries, 

tomatoes and broccoli

 Drink plenty of fluid throughout the day to avoid dehydration
05/2014 2

Meal Preparation Tips for Decreasing Fatigue:

 Try canned, frozen or other prepared convenience foods.

 Take advantage of the microwave to cook or re-heat prepared foods.

 When feeling well enough, prepare extra portions and freeze in smaller 

containers to eat on days when you are tired.

 Order take-out foods. Choose healthier options such as salads, wraps and 

grilled or baked foods when looking at menu options.

 Ask health care professionals about community resources that deliver 

prepared meals.

 Allow family and friends to help with meal preparation or bring meals and 

snack foods to you.

 Keep easy-to-grab snacks on hand.

Other Ways to Decrease Fatigue

 Make time for rest and take short naps when needed.

 Don’t stay up too late; try to keep a good bedtime and morning wake-up 

routine.

 Avoid too much caffeine, which can interfere with a good night’s sleep.

 Avoid excessive alcohol, which may interfere with sleep and interact with 

medical treatments.

 Avoid boredom. Keep engaged in social and productive activities such as 

hobbies or volunteering in other interests that you enjoy.

For any additional nutrition questions, please contact your VA dietitian.
§ 594.15 Allocation amounts. ( a ) *Amounts and match requirement.* HUD will make grants, in the form of matching funds, to eligible neighborhood development organizations. HUD reserves the right to make grants for less than the maximum amount established by statute, and to limit the number of times a previous grantee can receive funding. A Federal matching ratio will be established for each grantee in accordance with the statutory requirement that the highest ratios be established for neighborhoods having the greatest degree of economic distress or the smallest number of households.
( b ) *Administrative costs.* The Secretary may use no more than 5 percent of the funds appropriated for the program for administrative or other expenses in connection with the program.
### §402. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts Apr. 1, 1932, ch. 95, §10, 47 Stat. 78; Mar. 3, 1933, ch. 200, §2, 47 Stat. 1427, related to repayment of advances under sections 391a and 397 of this title. See section 391a–1 of this title.
#### § 51.1 Purpose.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is providing program Assistant Secretaries and administrators and field offices with environmental standards, criteria and guidelines for determining project acceptability and necessary mitigating measures to insure that activities assisted by the Department achieve the goal of a suitable living environment.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3223

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain mixture of fungicide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain mixture of 

fungicide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURE OF FUNGICIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.07 Mixture of fungicide containing Quinoxyfen (5,7-

dichloro-4-(4-fluorophenoxy)) 

as the active ingredient and 

application adjuvants (CAS 

No. 124495–18–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

3808.20.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 3223 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
AUTHORIZATION

        Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints each of John M. Lowber, Bonnie J. Paskvan, and Alfred J. Walker,
signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity
as an affiliate of General Communication, Inc. (the "Company"), Form 4, in
accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
rules thereunder;

(2) do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which
may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 4, complete
and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or
similar authority; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to,
in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being
understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the
undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall
contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such
attorney-in-fact's discretion.

        The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power
and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever
requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights
and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of
substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the
rights and powers herein granted. The undersigned acknowledges that the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the
undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the
undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

        This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
undersigned is no longer required to file Form 4, with respect to the
undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company,
unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the
foregoing attorneys-in-fact.


                                   1
<PAGE>
        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 21st day of January 2003.


                                 /s/
                                 ------------------------
                                 Signature


                                 Marsha E. Burns
                                 ------------------------
                                 Print Name
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000785791
<NAME> ASSOCIATED PLANNERS REALTY FUND
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         129,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,194
<PP&E>                                       7,030,222
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,306,435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,911,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,787
<BONDS>                                      1,462,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,176,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,911,726
<SALES>                                        166,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,961
<CGS>                                          139,810
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,172)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.72)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nemencio Franco, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 495]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about May 9, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion to be resentenced, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for it to exercise its discretion and determine, either on the current record or on the basis of any additional submissions the parties might make, whether substantial justice dictates that the application should be denied, and, if not, to inform defendant of the new sentence it would impose.

The motion court erred in denying, on the apparent ground of ineligibility, defendant’s motion to be resentenced in accordance with the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738). Since defendant is a person serving a sentence for an A-I drug felony, he is eligible for resentencing pursuant to the Act, and, as the People concede, he is thus entitled to a remand for further proceedings on the motion as indicated *(see People v LaFontaine,*36 AD3d 474 [2007]; *People v Arana,*32 AD3d 305 [2006]). We reject defendant’s request for reassignment of the motion to a differ*366ent Justice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Sweeny, Malone and Kavanagh, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 888
Editorial Note: For revisions and amendments affecting Schedules A, B, C, and D, issued under part 888, but not carried in the Code of Federal Regulations, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 888.111 Fair market rents for existing housing: Applicability. ( a ) The fair market rents (FMRs) for existing housing are determined by HUD and are used in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program (HCV program) (part 982 of this title), Section 8 project-based assistance programs and other programs requiring their use. In the HCV program, the FMRs are used to determine payment standard schedules. In the Section 8 project-based assistance programs, the FMRs are used to determine the maximum initial rent (at the beginning of the term of a housing assistance payments contract).
( b ) Fair market rent means the rent, including the cost of utilities (except telephone), as established by HUD, pursuant to this subpart, for units of varying sizes (by number of bedrooms), that must be paid in the market area to rent privately owned, existing, decent, safe and sanitary rental housing of modest (non-luxury) nature with suitable amenities.
[64 FR 56911, Oct. 21, 1999, as amended at 81 FR 80580, Nov. 16, 2017]
MONTEREY BAY NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY

CENTRAL CAUPORNA COAST
MONTEREY BAY

tar

73

1a
se

|) Stee:

MONTEREY BAY
NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY

SSeSeeaee

Seco
Saas
SERARIE SESE
patos Sesest

Mem bey ween ieee ata 9 8

ieceedeee erecta cre erases
i eas SS
Se ae eney earns
aamyat

Doom seen ee ere reg ore one

SESS

Sr Boe orem
Teas SE

a=
SSS SSEee
EE

adel

nee
— cee”

oe o oe Cormeen oom
oe
i

Sieeieementienl

femoi sees ester inessrnieresn
HESS SSS
Seas aes

ESE
SERS See
EEESYensssises

Tikdh (eter naan
izeuebase

CAS! AND GECOENE sunt |
woe ° oo
Aslimegtnccontoee newts: 1) MATIRS TO 180 METER OOF - -
‘NRMCE 26 ETERS 90 aaron BOAT - os

DATUN: MEAM (OYaNR LOW WAR

Ken) KORO

Soneneny teeming
Exhibit 99.1

Countrywide Home Loans logo here

400 Countrywide Way
Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

March 23, 2005

Deutsche Bank
Re: Exhibit I
1761 E. St, Andrews Place
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Attn: Katie Wannenmacher

Officer's Certificate

I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., fka Countrywide Funding
Corporation.  I further certify, with respect to the Servicing Agreements for
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations, Inc., the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 under the Agreements and, to the best
of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
duties, responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the
fiscal year.

/s/: Joseph Candelario
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

March 23, 2005
Date

<page>

Countrywide Home Loans
Deutsche Bank Investor Numbers/Deals Added
For the Calendar Year 2004

Investor        Deal
Number        Name
7003870       DEUTSCHE BK (CDC-MCT-04-HE1) GP1
7003871       DEUTSCHE BK (CDC-MCT-04-HE1) GP2
7003872       DEUTSCHE BK (CDC-MCT-04-HE1) GP3
7003879       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE1) GR1
7003880       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE1) GR2
7003883       DEUTSCHE BANK (MS 04-NC2) GRP1
7003893       DEUTSCHE BANK (MS 04-NC2) GR2
7004047       DEUTSCHE BANK (MS 04-HE2) GR1
7004048       DEUTSCHE BANK (MS 04-HE2) GR2
7004069       DEUTSCHE BANK MSAC2004-NC3 GR1
7004070       DEUTSCHE BANK MSAC2004-NC3 GR2
7004176       DEUTSCHE BANK CDC MCT04-HE2 G1
7004177       DEUTSCHE BANK CDC MCT04-HE2 G2
7004183       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAA 2004-03)
7004197       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAA 2004-05)
7004288       DEUTSCHE BANK MSAC2004-NC5 GR1
7004289       DEUTSCHE BANK MSAC2004-NC5 GR2
7004290       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE4) GR1
7004291       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE4) GR2
7004302       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAMP TRUST04AR1)
7004343       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 2004-HE5) G1
7004382       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAMP 2004-HE2)
7004391       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 2004-HE5) G2
7004429       DEUTSCHE BANK (NEW CENTURY 2004-A)
7004468       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 2004-HE6) G1
7004470       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 2004-HE6) G2
7004478       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAMP 04-AR2) G1
7004479       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAMP 04-AR2) G2
7004480       DEUTSCHE BANK (GSAMP 04-AR2) G3
7004499       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE7) GRP1
7004500       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE7) GRP2
7004501       DEUTSCHE BANK (MSAC 04-HE7) GRP3
### **CHAPTER 305—EXONERATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
30501.
Definitions.
30502.
Application.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—EXONERATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

30521.
Declaration of nature and value of goods.
30522.
Loss by fire.
30523.
General limit of liability.
30524.
Limit of liability for personal injury or death.
30525.
Apportionment of losses.
30526.
Provisions requiring notice of claim or limiting time for bringing action.
30527.
Provisions limiting liability for personal injury or death.
30528.
Vicarious liability for medical malpractice with regard to crew.
30529.
Action by owner for limitation.
30530.
Liability as master, officer, or seaman not affected.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2022**—Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXV, §11503(e), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4131, inserted subchapter headings, added item 30501 and struck out former item 30501 "Definition", and renumbered items 30503 to 30512 as 30521 to 30530, respectively.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128630 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128630 

 COA: 251652 
 Kent CC: 03-004118-FH 

JONATHON ELSEY CURL, a/k/a 

JONATHON ELSBY CURL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
#### §§ 97.6-97.7 [Reserved]