alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information primarily extracted from
Capita Preferred Trust's unaudited consolidated income statement and
balance sheet as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                 1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                 0
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       0<F2>
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0<F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   206,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  0<F2>
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                           6,186
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                      200,000
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     206,186
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  14,010
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   14,010
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               14,010
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      14,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0
        

<FN>
*    In accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(c) 2, inapplicable or immaterial
     financial data is reflected as zero value.

<F1> - Accumulated depreciation relates to equipment under operating leases.

<F2> - This item is not applicable since the Company does not prepare a
       classified balance sheet.


</TABLE>
### §§615ppp to 615www. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 615ppp, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §301, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 967, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Salmon Falls division, Upper Snake River project, Idaho.

Section 615qqq, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §302, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 967, related to water exchanges.

Section 615rrr, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §303, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 968, related to irrigation repayment contracts.

Section 615sss, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §304, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 968, related to fish and wildlife benefits.

Section 615ttt, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §305, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 968, related to availability of irrigation water pumping power.

Section 615uuu, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §306, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 968, related to interest rates.

Section 615vvv, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §307, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 968, related to newly irrigated lands.

Section 615www, Pub. L. 92–514, title III, §308, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 968, authorized appropriations for this project.
§ 886.308 Maximum total annual contract commitment. ( a ) *Number of units assisted.* Based on the final disposition program developed in accordance with 24 CFR part 290, HUD shall determine the number of units to be assisted up to 100 percent of the units in the project.
( b ) *Maximum assistance.* The maximum total annual housing assistance payments that may be committed under the contract shall be the total of the gross rents for all the contract units in the project.
( c ) *Changes in contract amounts.* In order to assure that housing assistance payments will be increased on a timely basis to cover increases in contract rents, changes in family composition, or decreases in family incomes: ( 1 ) A project account shall be established and maintained, in an amount as determined by HUD consistent with section 8(c)(6) of the Act, out of amounts by which the maximum annual contract commitment per year exceeds amounts paid under the contract for any fiscal year. This account shall be established and maintained by HUD as a specifically identified and segregated account, and payment shall be made therefrom only for the purposes of: ( i ) Housing assistance payments, and
( ii ) Other costs specifically authorized or approved by HUD.
( 2 ) Whenever a HUD-approved estimate of required housing assistance payments for a fiscal year exceeds the maximum annual contract commitment, causing the amount in the project account to be less than an amount equal to 40 percent of the maximum annual contract commitment, HUD, within a reasonable period of time, shall take such additional steps authorized by Section 8(c)(6) of the Act as may be necessary to carry out this assurance, including (as provided in that section of the Act) “the reservation of annual contributions authority for the purpose of amending housing assistance contracts or the allocation of a portion of new authorizations for the purpose of amending housing assistance contracts.”
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/CHARLES BAKER                                                          
| |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     | Charles Baker
      Chief Financial Officer
      Dated: December 13, 2006

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit
      31.1**






**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      John
      A. Martell, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MISCOR Group,
      Ltd.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4.  The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      March 29, 2007.







/s/
              John A. MartellJohn
                A. MartellChief
                Executive Officer
OFF I O F TMAMC^O R U i atlanti c southeas t : S 

### ! i Apri l 6,201 0 Tod dM
. Homan Directo r EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Division , X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Department

o f Transportatio n Roo m6417 1 40 0 7 * Street , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 0
Re : Docke t

OST-2008-0112
. Orde r Requestin g Proposa l fo r Essentia l Ai r

Servic e a t Meridian , Mississipp i Dea r Mr
. Homan : I n respons e t o th e Department' s Order 2010-3-9 , Atlanti c Southeas t Airlines , doin g busines s a s Delt aCoimection , i s enclosin g detaile dsubsid y proposal s for essential ai r

servic e fo

r th e above-mentione dcities
. Th e followin g outline s th e proposa l detail s utilizin g th e 50-sea t regional je t

aircraft
. Meridian
. Mississipp i Th e propose dMEI servic e reflecte dbelo w offer s thirtee n (13 ) weekl y round-trip s fromAtlanta
. Th e require dannual subsid y fo r thi s servic e wil l b e $678,936

.

Meridian , {Mississipp i Ori g AI L ME I AT L ME I Des t

ME I AT L ME I AT L Dep t

20:3 7 6:3 0 14:5 0 15:3 0 Ar r

20:5 5 8:5 2 15:0 5 17:4 6 Equi p

CR J CR J CR J CR J Day s

Dail y Dail y

x 6 x 6Ref : OST-2008-011 2 Atlanti c Southeas t Airline s

Delt aConnectio n provide s schedule dservic e betwee n Delta' s hub s an dman y citie s throughou t

th e U.S
. Delta' s networ

k provide s thes e communitie s with convenient , single-carrier connection s to hundred s o f flights in ttie U.S./Canadian an dworldwide
. W e loo k forwar dt o th e opportunity to continu e providin g essential ai r servic e t o th e al l th e customer s o f thes e communities
. Respectfull y submitted , Jo n D
. Lindlie f Directo r - Plarmin g & Developmen t
Enclosure

9
o/fanflcsotiffieos f Pag e 2 o f 3EA S servic e proposa l fo r servic e t o Meridian , Mississipp i Ref : OST-2008-011 2 Atlanti c Southeas t

Airline s

EA S Statio n Docket Number Hu b Roun dtrip s pe r

wee k Completio n Facto r Tota l Passenger s Tota l Block Hour s Total Departure s Passenge r Revenu e Other Revenu e Tota l Revenu e Pilot s Fuel Maintenanc e Aircraf t Tota l Direct s Total bidirect s Total Operatin g Inflation Rate allowanc e 0.75 % Profit 5.0 % Economi c Cos t Require dAnnua

l Subsid y Rat e ME I OST-2008-0n 2

ATL 1 3 97 % 35,50 6 1,65 7 1,31 5 $4,331,75 1 $438,96 3 $4,770,71 4 $539,10 1 $1,140,19 3 $756,36 1 $728,76 1 $3,164,41 6 $1,988,91 6 $5,153,33 3 $38,65 0 $257,66 7 $5,449,64 9 $678,93 6

atlanti c Knjtheas t Pag e 3 o f 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RENTERIA,

Petitioner,

 v.

ROBERT AYERS, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

No. C 08-5237 TEH (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit, Hayward

v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010)

(en banc), addressed important issues relating to federal habeas

review of BPH decisions denying parole to California state

prisoners. As such, the Court will provide each party an

opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not to exceed ten (10)

pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc

decision applies to the facts presented in Petitioner’s challenge to

BPH’s decision denying him parole. 

//

//

Case 3:08-cv-05237-TEH Document 9 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

The Court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than May 10, 2010, Respondent must send to

Petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than May 28, 2010, Respondent must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts presented

in Petitioner’s case. 

3. No later than July 2, 2010, Petitioner must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts presented

in his case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 05/04/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.08\Renteria-08-5237-hayward briefing.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-05237-TEH Document 9 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 2
### §12309. Penalties

(a) A person willfully violating this chapter or a regulation prescribed under this chapter shall be fined not more than $5,000, imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(b) A person violating this chapter or a regulation prescribed under this chapter is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $1,000. If the violation involves the operation of a vessel, the vessel also is liable in rem for the penalty.

(c) When a civil penalty of not more than $200 has been assessed under this chapter, the Secretary may refer the matter of collection of the penalty directly to the United States magistrate judge of the jurisdiction in which the person liable may be found for collection procedures under supervision of the district court and under an order issued by the court delegating this authority under section 636(b) of title 28.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 592; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 12309(a) | 46:1483 |
| 12309(b) | 46:1484(b) |
| 12309(c) | 46:1484(d) |

Section 12309 provides for civil and criminal penalties for violation of the vessel numbering provisions in this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" in subsec. (c) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2004-13
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-13


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

     (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
     preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
     under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

     (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
     Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout
     such year.




/s/ Joseph M. Candelario                        Dated: March 28, 2005
------------------------

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Mark Wong                                   Dated: March 28, 2005
-------------

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
### §835. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–375, title I, §111(d), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1821; Pub. L. 105–178, title VII, §7203(a)(2), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 477

Section, Pub. L. 94–210, title V, §515, Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 82, directed Secretary to report to Congress within 90 days following end of each fiscal year on financial condition and operations of Fund and of obligation guarantee fund during such fiscal year, and on anticipated condition and operations of Fund and of obligation guarantee fund during current fiscal year.
#### § 886.122 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT
      23.1


SHERB & CO., LLP
              1900
                  NW Corporate Blvd., SuiteEast
                  210
                Boca
                  Raton, FL 33431
                Tel:
                  561.886.4200
                Fax:
                  561.886.3330
                e-mail:
                  info@sherbcpa.com
                Offices
                    in New York and Florida


*Certified
      Public Accountants*






CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To
      the
      Board of Directors


MDwerks,
      Inc.





We
      hereby
      consent to the use in Form 10KSB our report dated March 17, 2008 on the consolidated
      financial statements of MDwerks, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007
      and
      for the year then ended.







Certified Public
              Accountants






March
      27, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of RoomLinX, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Frank Elenio, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

Dated:  August 23, 2004

                                                       /s/ Frank Elenio
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Frank Elenio
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       RoomLinX, Inc

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 8, 2017

No. 04-17-00581-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY JANE HARGROVE,

From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-002-G

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In her October 13, 2017 notification of late record, court reporter Patricia Abeyta advised 

the court that she had broken her right humerus, was temporarily unable to work, and requested a

sixty-day extension of time to file the record until December 29, 2017. After we granted in part 

her first motion for extension of time to file the record, the reporter’s record was due to be filed 

with this court on November 29, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an 

ordinary appeal to thirty days).

On December 6, 2017, Appellant filed with this court a copy of a letter addressed to 

Patricia Abeyta indicating that, despite multiple attempts, Appellant has been unable to contact 

her regarding the status of the reporter’s record. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed.

We ORDER court reporter Patricia Abeyta to file in this court the reporter’s record, or a 

second request for extension of time to file the record, not later than FIFTEEN DAYS from 

the date of this order. See id.

If the reporter’s record or a second request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record is not filed as ordered, a show cause order shall issue directing Patricia Abeyta to appear 

on a day certain and show cause why she should not be held in contempt for failing to file the 

record or respond to this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 21.002 (West 2004) (authorizing contemnor punishment up to “a fine of not more than $500 or 

confinement in the county jail for not more than six months, or both such a fine and confinement 

in jail”); Johnson v. State, 151 S.W.3d 193, 195–96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (noting the court’s 

previous action holding a court reporter in contempt for “repeatedly fail[ing] to prepare and file 

the record” and “order[ing] him incarcerated . . . until the record was finished”).
We direct the clerk of this court to cause a copy of this order to be served on Patricia 

Abeyta by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, or 

give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6309
KEVIN ALEXANDER MOSS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2884-S) Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Alexander Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting in part, and rejecting in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moss v. Waters , No. CA-95-2884-S (D. Md. Feb. 14, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED