alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 58.43 Dissemination and/or publication of the findings of no significant impact. ( a ) If the responsible entity makes a finding of no significant impact, it must prepare a FONSI notice, using the current HUD-recommended format or an equivalent format. As a minimum, the responsible entity must send the FONSI notice to individuals and groups known to be interested in the activities, to the local news media, to the appropriate Tribal, Federal, State, and local agencies to the Regional Offices of the Environmental Protection Agency having jurisdiction and to the HUD Field Office (or the State where applicable). The responsible entity may also publish the FONSI notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the affected community or on an appropriate Government website that is accessible to individuals with disabilities and provides meaningful access for individuals with Limited English Proficiency. If the notice is not published, it must also be prominently displayed in public buildings, such as the local Post Office and within the project area or in accordance with procedures established as part of the citizen participation process.
( b ) The responsible entity may disseminate or publish a FONSI notice at the same time it disseminates or publishes the NOI/RROF required by § 58.70. If the notices are released as a combined notice, the combined notice shall: ( 1 ) Clearly indicate that it is intended to meet two separate procedural requirements; and
( 2 ) Advise the public to specify in their comments which “notice” their comments address.
( c ) The responsible entity must consider the comments and make modifications, if appropriate, in response to the comments, before it completes its environmental certification and before the recipient submits its RROF. If funds will be used in Presidentially declared disaster areas, modifications resulting from public comment, if appropriate, must be made before proceeding with the expenditure of funds.
[61 FR 19122, Apr. 30, 1996, as amended at 89 FR 30913, Apr. 23, 2024]
##### 






EXHIBIT 32.1


Polypore, Inc.


Chief Executive Officer Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002


10-K




|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



| |     |                   
| | --- | ------------------
| | By: | /s/ Robert B. Toth

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Robert B. Toth                       
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas March 1, 2021 No. 04-20-00426-CV IN RE THE ESTATE OF DONACIANO ALDRETE, JR. From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-18-70 Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was due February 18, 2020, thirty days after the reporter's record was filed. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. We therefore order Appellant to file, by March 11, 2021, appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 1st day of March, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### KRAUS et al., Respondents, v. SONDHEIM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Harry Kraus and others against Nella Sondheim, as executrix. C. J. Hardy, for appellant. H. Brill, for respondent. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3023 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-amino-4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5- 

triazine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-amino-4-methoxy-6- 

methyl-1,3,5-triazine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-AMINO-4-METHOXY-6-METHYL-1,3,5-TRIAZINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.08.01 2-amino-4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine (CAS No. 

1668–54–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2933.69.60) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 3023 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 75.9 Requirements. ( a ) *Employment and training.* ( 1 ) Consistent with existing Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, PHAs or other recipients receiving public housing financial assistance, and their contractors and subcontractors, must make their best efforts to provide employment and training opportunities generated by the public housing financial assistance to Section 3 workers.
( 2 ) PHAs or other recipients, and their contractors and subcontractors, must make their best efforts described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section in the following order of priority: ( i ) To residents of the public housing projects for which the public housing financial assistance is expended;
( ii ) To residents of other public housing projects managed by the PHA that is providing the assistance or for residents of Section 8-assisted housing managed by the PHA;
( iii ) To participants in YouthBuild programs; and
( iv ) To low- and very low-income persons residing within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in which the assistance is expended.
( b ) *Contracting.* ( 1 ) Consistent with existing Federal, state, and local laws and regulations, PHAs and other recipients of public housing financial assistance, and their contractors and subcontractors, must make their best efforts to award contracts and subcontracts to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers.
( 2 ) PHAs and other recipients, and their contractors and subcontractors, must make their best efforts described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section in the following order of priority: ( i ) To Section 3 business concerns that provide economic opportunities for residents of the public housing projects for which the assistance is provided;
( ii ) To Section 3 business concerns that provide economic opportunities for residents of other public housing projects or Section-8 assisted housing managed by the PHA that is providing the assistance;
( iii ) To YouthBuild programs; and
( iv ) To Section 3 business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the metropolitan area (or nonmetropolitan county) in which the assistance is provided.
### §30903. Waiver of immunity

(a) In General.—In a case in which, if a vessel were privately owned or operated, or if cargo were privately owned or possessed, or if a private person or property were involved, a civil action in admiralty could be maintained, a civil action in admiralty in personam may be brought against the United States or a federally-owned corporation. In a civil action in admiralty brought by the United States or a federally-owned corporation, an admiralty claim in personam may be filed or a setoff claimed against the United States or corporation.

(b) Non-Jury.—A claim against the United States or a federally-owned corporation under this section shall be tried without a jury.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1518.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30903 | 46 App.:742 (1st, 3d sentences). | Mar. 9, 1920, ch. 95, §2 (1st, 3d sentences), 41 Stat. 525; Pub. L. 86–770, §3, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 912; Pub. L. 104–324, title XI, §1105, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3967. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "civil action" are substituted for "proceeding" and "libel" because of rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (28 App. U.S.C.) and for consistency in the chapter. The words "civil action in admiralty in personam" are substituted for "any appropriate nonjury proceeding in personam" for clarity. The words "in rem or in personam in any district" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "admiralty claim" are substituted for "cross libel" for consistency in this chapter and with the various means of asserting a claim (such as by counterclaim or cross-claim) allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The words "with the same force and effect as if the libel had been filed by a private party" are omitted as unnecessary.

Subsection (b) is substituted for the word "nonjury" to clarify that the nonjury requirement applies to any claim against the United States or a federally-owned corporation under this section regardless of which party brings the action.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 318 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 

Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as a unit 

of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

HR 318 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING 

2 CASTLE NUGENT FARMS. 

3 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

4 (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the south5 eastern shore of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is 

6 the largest parcel of privately-held land in the Virgin 

7 Islands and has been an operating cattle ranch for 

8 50 years. 

9 (2) This land has the largest and healthiest 

10 fringing coral reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands. 

11 (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and 

12 pasturelands with considerable cultural resources in13 cluding both pre-Columbian and post-European set14 tlement. 

15 (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large his16 toric 17th century Danish estate house that sits on 

17 over 4 miles of pristine Caribbean oceanfront prop18 erty. 

19 (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nest20 ing and night heron nesting, it is the home for the 

21 Senepol cattle breed, a unique breed of cattle that 

22 was developed on St. Croix in the early 1900’s to 

23 adapt to the island’s climate. 

24 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry 

25 out a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of des-
3 

HR 318 RFS 

1 ignating Castle Nugent Farms as a unit of the National 

2 Park System. 

3 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 

4 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 

5 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 

6 by this section. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 15, 

2005. 

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL, 

Clerk.
(No. 85-CC-2329

#### Johnny Smith, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 23, 1992.*

*Order filed December 18, 1992.*

Johnny Smith, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (John R. Buckley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

OPINION

Burke, J.

This cause coming to be heard upon the report of the commissioner, after hearing all evidence and reviewing the evidentiary depositions submitted, this Court being folly advised in the premises, finds:

That Claimant was incarcerated at Pontiac Correctional Center when he sustained injury to his finger. The injury occurred while Claimant was participating in a recreational basketball game *on ice.*(Emphasis addéd.) *64The Claimant reported his injury and received medical attention, but was dissatisfied with the medical care received. At hearing, the finger appeared to have a mild deformation.

Claimant’s attending physician, Dr. R. S. Pankaj, indicated that Claimant’s finger was X-rayed soon after the ice-basketball game and that the finger in question was not broken. He described the injury as a “mild fusiform swelling in the proximal interphalangeal joint area, * * * and Claimant had a ten degree lack of full extension [of the finger].”

Claimant’s claim is denied for failure to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the Respondent was guilty of negligence. When one voluntarily undertakes to play basketball on ice, there is an assumption of risk which attaches to said activity.

Wherefore, it is hereby ordered that this claim is denied.

ORDER

Burke, J.

This cause coming to be. heard upon Claimant’s motion for rehearing and the Court being fully advised in the premises,

It is hereby ordered that Claimant’s petition is hereby denied.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  of  InteliData
Technologies  Corporation  (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Alfred S. Dominick,  Jr.,  Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer and
Acting Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


August 9, 2005           By:      /s/ Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
                                  Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
                                  Financial Officer (Principal Executive
                                  Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



This certificate is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Rule
13a-14 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
and Item 601 of  Regulation  S-K and not as a document  "filed" as a part of the
Report.  This certificate shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any
of the Company's filings under the Exchange Act.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES LaVELL HARRIS a/k/a 

SMILEY JAMES HARRIS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., 

Respondents. /

No. C 09-2829 SI (pr)

JUDGMENT

This action is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner filing a new habeas action after

he exhausts state court remedies for all the claims he wishes to present in a federal habeas

petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

DATED: April 1, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02829-SI Document 9 Filed 04/01/10 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 15, 2015

No. 04-15-00182-CR

EX PARTE Juan TORRES,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-04-12006-CR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due June 8, 2015.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA-2013-N-1119; FDA-2010-N-0622; FDA-2011-N-0016; FDA-2009-N-0501; and FDA-2019-N-6098]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of information collections that have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-7726, 
                        *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements for the information collections are available on the internet at 
                    *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*
                     An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Table 1—List of Information Collections Approved by OMB
Title of collection
OMB
                             control No.
Date approval
                             expiresFood Canning Establishment Registration, Process Filing and Recordkeeping for Acidified and Thermally Processed Low-Acid Foods
0910-0037
10/31/2023Color Additive Certification Requests and Recordkeeping
0910-0216
10/31/2023Recordkeeping and Records Access Requirements for Food Facilities
0910-0560
10/31/2023Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Reportable Food
0910-0643
10/31/2023Focus Groups as Used by the Food and Drug Administration
0910-0497
11/30/2023
 Dated: November 25, 2020. Lauren K. Roth, Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 2020-26571 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
§ 884.122 Separate project requirement. ( a ) In the case of a Private-Owner Project or a PHA-Owner Project, each Agreement and Contract shall constitute a separate project.
( b ) In the case of a Private-Owner/PHA Project such project may not include more than one type of Section 8 assistance, shall be processed with a separate ACC List and ACC Part I and shall be assigned a separate project number. All new construction units to be placed under a single Contract shall comprise a separate project. However, the field office director may designate as a single project the units to be covered by two or more such Contracts for new construction projects where: ( 1 ) The units are placed under ACC on the same date; and
( 2 ) Such consolidation is necessary in the interest of administrative efficiency.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                   15,894
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            65,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                510
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        115,603
<PP&E>                                   52,993
<DEPRECIATION>                           13,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          344,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    63,072
<BONDS>                                  30,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  4,132
<OTHER-SE>                              240,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            344,399
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        202,893
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           116,999
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         65,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            (34)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        1,721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          18,721
<INCOME-TAX>                              7,523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      11,198
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             11,198
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.26

<FN>
Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>

</TABLE>