United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al. 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree 

ELLEN MAHAN 

Acting Section Chief 

JUSTIN A. SAVAGE, Senior Counsel (D.C. Bar 466345) 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Environment and Natural Resources Division 

Environmental Enforcement Section 

Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 

Washington, D.C. 20044-7369 

Tel: (202) 514-5293 

Fax: (202) 616-6584 

DEAN K. DUNSMORE 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Environment and Natural Resources Division 

801 B Street, Suite 504 

Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3657 

Tel: (907) 271-5452 

Fax: (907) 271-5827 

Email: dean.dunsmore@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil Action No.: ____ 

 ) Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ) For 30-Day Public Comment Period 

and ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ) 

AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, ) 

 ) 

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 1 of 67
2 

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al. 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF LODGING OF PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE 

FOR 30-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD

The United States has lodged with the Court as Exhibit 1 to this Notice a proposed Consent 

Decree that would resolve all litigation in this action commenced by the contemporaneous filing 

of its Complaint. The United States respectfully requests that the Court not consider whether to 

approve and enter the settlement embodied in the proposed Consent Decree at this time. The 

United States is required by regulation to invite the public to comment on the proposed Consent 

Decree for a period of thirty (30) days before seeking judicial approval. Upon expiration of that 

comment period, the United States will advise the Court of any comments received and of the 

United States’ position as to whether the proposed decree should be approved and entered by the 

Court. 

Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 50.7, the United States may not seek the Court’s approval of the 

proposed Consent Decree until the opportunity for public comment is satisfied. Notice of the 

lodging of this Consent Decree, and the opportunity to comment thereon, will be published in the 

Federal Register. The United States will then receive public comments on the proposed Consent 

Decree for the requisite 30-day public comment period. During the pendency of the public 

comment period, no action is required of this Court. This regulatory requirement has been 

acknowledged by the parties to the proposed decree as a condition of the settlement as reflected 

in Paragraph 175 of the proposed decree. Upon expiration of the comment period, the United 

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 2 of 67
3 

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al. 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree 

States will provide the Court with any comments received and advise the Court of its position 

regarding approval and entry of the decree. 

In the meantime, the United States respectfully requests that the Court take no action with 

respect to Exhibit 1 to this Notice, the lodged Consent Decree, until the United States moves for 

the entry of the Consent Decree or otherwise advises the Court.

Respectfully submitted, 

 _/s/ Justin A. Savage 

 JUSTIN SAVAGE 

 Senior Counsel 

 Environmental Enforcement Section 

 Environment and Natural Resources 

 Division 

 P.O. Box 7611 

 Washington, DC 20044-7611 

 (202) 514-5293 

 justin.savage@usdoj.gov

 /s/ Dean K. Dunsmore

DEAN K. DUNSMORE 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Environment and Natural Resources Division 

801 B Street, Suite 504 

Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3657 

Tel: (907) 271-5452 

Fax: (907) 271-5827 

Email: dean.dunsmore@usdoj.gov

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 3 of 67
4 

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al. 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree 

Of Counsel: 

SABRINA ARGENTIERI 

Attorney-Advisor, Air Enforcement Division 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V 

77 W. Jackson Blvd. 

Chicago, Illinois 60604 

JULIANE MATTHEWS 

Assistant Regional Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

U.S. EPA Region 10 (ORC-158) 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101 

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 4 of 67
5 

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al. 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil Action No.: ____ 

 ) Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION ) For 30-Day Public Comment Period 

and ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ) 

AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

_________________________________________ ) 

EXHIBIT 1: PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE FOR 

30-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD 

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 5 of 67
ELLEN MAHAN

Acting Section Chief

JUSTIN A. SAVAGE, Senior Counsel (D.C. Bar 466345)

U.S. Department of Justice

Environment and Natural Resources Division

Environmental Enforcement Section.

Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 761.1

Washington, D.C. 20044-7369

Tel: (202) 514-5293

Fax: (202) 616-6584

DEAN K. DUNSMORE

U.S. Department of Justice

Environment and Natural Resources Division

801 B Street, Suite 504

Anchorage, Alaska 99501-3657

Tel: (907) 271-5452 .

Fax: (9U7) 271-5827

Email: dean.dunsmore@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Plaintiff )

v. ) Civil Action No.:

Consent Decree

GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION )

INC. and ALASKA INDUSTRIAL )

DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, )

Defendants. )

1

CONSENT DECREE

United States v. Golden Malley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 6 of 67
TABLE OF CONTENTS

L JURISDICTION AND VENiJE ....:......................................................:......................3

IL APPLICABILITY ..............................................:........................:...:..................:...........4

III. DEFINITIONS ................................:.. ......:............................................................:....5

IV. CIVIL PENAL'I'Y ..................................................:.........:.................:.........................12

V. NOX EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND CONTROLS .....:..............................:...........13

VI. S02 EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND CONTROLS ..........................:....:.................i5

VII. PM EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND CONTROLS ..................................................16

VIII. PROHIBITION ON NETTING CREDITS OR OFFSETS .........:........... ..... ....19

IX. ENVIIZONMENTAL MITIGATION PROJECT .................:......~..:.....................,......20

X. MERCURY ........................:.........................................................................................22

XI. RESOLUTION OF CNIL CLAIMS ......................:...... ................ .................23

XII. PERIODIC REPORTING .................................................................................:.....:....23

XIII. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SUBMITTALS ....................:.................................25

XIV. STIPULATED PENALTIES .............................................................:......................:..26

XV. FORCE MAJEURE .........:.............:......:.....................................................................36

XVI. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ....:.................:..............:.....................................................39

XVII. PERMITS ..............................................................:...........:..........................................41

XVITI. INFORMATION COLLECTION AND RETENTION ..............................................44

XIX. NOTICES .....................................................................................................................45

XXI. EFFECTIVE DATE .....................................................................................................50

XII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION .............................................................................50

XIII. MODIFICATION ........................................................................................................51

XXN. GENERAL PROVISIONS ..........................................................................................51

XXV. SIGNATORIES AND. SERVICE ................................................................................54

XXVI. PUBLIC COMIlVIENT/AGENCY REVIEW : ......... ........ ........:...............:...........55

XXVII. CONDITIONAL TERMINATION OF ENFORCEMENT UNDER CONSENT

DECREE.............:.............................. ....:...: :........ ..._................ ....:...............:......55

XXVIII. FINAL JUDGMENT ..........................................................................................:.........56

i

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 7 of 67
WHEREAS, Plaintiff, the United States of America ("the United States"), on behalf of the

United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), is concurrently filing a Complaint and

Consent Decree, for injunctive relief pursuant to Section 167 of the Clean Air Act ("Act" or

"CAA"), 42 U.S.C. §7477, to prevent Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc. ("GVEA") and/or

the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority ("AIDEA") (collectively the

"Defendants") from violating the Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") provisions of

Part C of Subchapter I ofthe Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7470-7492, and the federally enforceable Alaska

State Implementation Plan ("SIl'");

WHEREAS, Unit 1 at the Healy Power Plant in Healy, Alaska is a nominal 25 megawatt

("MW") coal-fired electric generating unit owned and operated by GVEA;

WI~REAS, Unit 2 at the Healy Power Plant, the Healy Clean Coal Project ("HCCP" or

"Unit 2") is a nomina150 MW coal-fired electric generating unit that is currently owned by

AIDEA, with GVEA acting as the operator of the unit;

WHEREAS, Unit 2 previously went through PSD review and received an Air Quality

Control Permit issued in 1993 and amended in 1994;

WHEREAS, Unit 2 was constructed in 1997 and has not been operated since 1998-1999;.

WHEREAS, in its Complaint, the United States alleges, inter alia, that Defendants intend

to reactivate and/or restart HCCP or Unit 2;

WHEREAS, the Complaint further alleges that the Defendants' project at Unit 2 at the

Healy Power Plant, a major emitting facility, would result in the construction of a new source or,

in the alternative, a major modification of an existing source without obtaining the necessary

1

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 8 of 67
permits under the Act and installing and operating the state-of-the-art controls necessary under

the Act to reduce air pollutants, particularly oxides of nitrogen ("NOX") emissions from Unit 2;

WHEREAS, Defendants have denied and continue to deny the violations alleged in the

Complaint, maintain that their construction and operation activities at the Healy Power Plant -.

have been and remain fully permitted and in compliance with the Clean Air Act, Defendants are

not liable for civil penalties or injunctive relief, and state that they are agreeing to the obligations

imposed by this Consent Decree solely to avoid the costs and uncertainties of litigation;

WHEREAS, Defendants do not admit any liability to the United States or any other

person, and nothing herein shall constitute an admission of liability;

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that nothing in this Consent Decree shall constitute an

admission of liability in this or any other proceeding;

WHEREAS, GVEA is a small, not-for-profit rural electric power generating cooperative

serving approximately 44,000 meters and with an approximate peak demand of 220 megawatts;

WI~REAS, GVEA serves the Alaskan Interior where, because of extreme climate

conditions, prudent utility practice is to conduct construction and maintenance on generating and

transmission facilities during summer months and where dispatch schedules may be impacted by

extreme climate during winter months;

WHEREAS, GVEA is an isolated power generating system operating without connection

to an interstate transmission grid;

WHEREAS, GVEA is generally not directed to supply power on an emergency basis by

any governmental agency or regulatory authority, nor is GVEA subject to a Regional

Transmission Organization or Independent System Operator;

2

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 9 of 67
WHEREAS, GVEA must supply electricity to the Alaskan'Interior, particularly during

the winter months, to protect against the loss of life and destruction of property under extreme

climate conditions regardless of system upsets and malfunctions;

WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that the restart activities for Unit 2 may require up to

18 months to complete;

WI~REAS, pursuant to terms of this Consent Decree, the Defendants are taking a

number of actions to mitigate. emissions from the. restart of Unit 2 including emission reductions

at Unit 1 of the Healy Power Plant and a stove changeout project;

WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that EPA is currently reviewing the Regional Haze SIP

submittal from Alaska and that EPA may consider the enforceable conditions in this Consent

Decree when it takes .final action on that SIP submission;

WI~REAS, the Parties believe that the emission limits established under this Consent

Decree are enforceable limits for purposes of Best Available Retrofit Technology ("BART") and

the Regional Haze SIP in Alaska;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed, and this .Court by entering this Consent Decree

finds, that this Consent Decree has been negotiated in good faith and at arm's length and that this

Consent Decree is fair, reasonable, in the public interest, and consistent with the goals of the Act;

NOW, TI~REFORE, with the consent of the Parties, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

11~_-- 1 _ 1 ~ -:_ELI L_ ~lJ_

1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action, the subject matter herein, and the

Parties consenting hereto, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, 1355, and 1367, and

pursuant to Section 167 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7477. Venue is proper under Section 167 of

3

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 10 of 67
the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7477 and under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c). For purposes. of this

Consent Decree, any action to enforce this Consent Decree, and the underlying Complaint,

the Defendants consent to the Court's jurisdiction over this action, to the Court's jurisdiction.

over the Defendants, and to venue in this district. The Defendants consent to and shall not

challenge entry of this Consent Decree or this Court's jurisdiction to enter and enforce this

Consent Decree.

2. For purposes of this Consent Decree, Defendants agreethat the Complaint states

claims upon which relief maybe granted pursuant to the PSD program.

II. APP .T RIL.ITY

3. Subject to Section XX (Sales or Transfers of Operational or Ownership Interests),

the provisions of this Consent Decree apply to and are binding upon the Parties, their

successors and assigns, and upon the Defendants' directors,.. officers,. employees, servants,

and agents.

4. Defendants shall provide a copy of this Consent Decree to all officers, employees,

and agents whose duties might reasonably include compliance with any provision of this

Consent Decree, as well as to any vendors, suppliers, consultants, contractors; agents, and

any other company other organization retained to perform any ofthe- work required by this

Consent Decree. Notwithstanding any retention of contractors, subcontractors, or agents to

perform any work required under this Consent Decree, the. Defendants shall be responsible

for ensuring that all work is performed in accordance. with the requirements of this Consent

Decree. In any action to enforce this Consent Decree, subject to Section XV (Force

Majeure), Defendants shall not assert as a defense the failure of its officers, directors,

4

United States v. Golden Yalley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 11 of 67
employees, servants, agents, or contractors to take actions necessary to comply with this

Consent Decree.

o ~I I~1 Y 1 ~ .

5. Every term expressly defined by this Section shall have the meaning given that

term herein. Every other term used in this Consent Decree that is also a term used under the

Act or in a federal regulation implementing the Act shall mean in this Consent Decree what

such term means under the Act or those regulations.

6. A "30-Day Rolling Average NOX Emission Rate" for a Unit shall be expressed in

lb/mmBTU and calculated in accordance with the following procedure: first,.sum the total

pounds of NOX emitted from the Unit during the current Unit Operating Day and the previous

29 Unit Operating Days; second, sum the total heat input to the Unit in mmBTU during the

current Unit Operating Day and the previous 29 Unit Operating Days; and third, divide the

total number of pounds of NOX emitted during the 30 Unit Operating Days by the total heat

input during the 30 Unit Operating. Days. Anew 30-Day Rolling Average NOX Emission

Rate shall be calculated far.each new Unit Operating. Day. Each 30-Day Rolling. Average

NOX Emission Rate shall include all emissions that occur during all periods within any Unit

Operating Day, including emissions from startup, shutdown, and Malfunction.

7. A "30-Day Rolling Average PM Emission Rate" for a Unit shall be expressed in

lb/mmBTU and calculated in accordance with the following procedure: first, sum the total

pounds of PM emitted from the Unit during the current Unit Operating Day and the previous

29 Unit Operating Days; second, sum the total heat input to the Unit in mmBTU during the

current Unit Operating Day and the previous 29 Unit Operating Days; and third, divide the.

total number of pounds of PM emitted during the 30 Unit Operating Days by the total heat

5

United States v. Golden Yadley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 12 of 67
input during the 30 Unit Operating Days. Anew 30-Day Rolling Average PM Emission Rate

shall be calculated for each new Unit Operating Day. Each 30-Day Rolling Average PM

Emission Rate shall include all emissions-that occur during all periods within any Unit

Operating Day, including emissions. from startup, shutdown, and Malfunction.

8. A "30-Day Rolling Average SO2 Emission Rate" for. a Unit shall be expressed in

lb/mmBTU and calculated in accordance with the following procedure: first, sum the total

pounds of S02 emitted from the Unit during the current Unit Operating Day and the previous

29 Unit Operating Days; second, sum the total heat input to the Unit in mmBTU during the

current Unit Operating Day and the previous 29 Unit Operating Days; and third, divide the

total number of pounds of S02 emitted during the 30Unit- Operating Days by the total heat

input during the 30 Unit Operating Days. Anew 30-Day Rolling Average SOZ Emission

Rate shall be calculated for each new Unit Operating Day. Each 30-Day Rolling Average

S02 Emission Rate shall include all emissions that occur during all periods within any Unit

Operating Day, including emissions from startup, shutdown,-and Malfunction.

9. "AIDEA" means the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority.

10. "Alaska SIP" means the Alaska State Implementation Plan, and any amendments

thereto, as approved by EPA pursuant to Section 110 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410.

11. "Baghouse" means a full stream (fabric filter or membrane) particulate emissions

control device.

12. "GEMS" or "Continuous Emission Monitoring System," means, for obligations

involving the monitoring of NOS, 502, and PM emissions under this Consent Decree, the

devices defined, installed and maintained specified by 40 C.F.R. Parts 60 and flow

6

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 13 of 67
monitoring devices necessary to calculate compliance with the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual

Tonnage Limitation.

13. "Clean Air Act" or "Act" or "CAA" means the federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 7401-7671q, and its implementing regulations.

14. "Complaint" means the. complaint filed by the United States in this action.

15. "Consent Decree" means this Consent Decree.

16. "Continuously Operate" ar "Continuous Operation" means that when a pollution

control technology or combustion control is required to be used at a Unit pursuant to this

Consent Decree (including, but not limited to, SCR, SNCR, SDA, DSI, Bag~ouse or TRW

Slagging Combustor), it shall be operated at all times such Unit is in operation, except as

otherwise provided by Section XV (Force Majeure), so as to minimize emissions to the greatest

extent practicable, consistent with the technological limitations, manufacturers' specifications,

and good engineering and maintenance practices for such equipment and the Unit.

17. "Date of Entry" means the date this Consent Decree is approved or signed by the

United States District Court Judge.

18. "Date of Lodging" means the date this Consent Decree is filed for lodging with

the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the District of Alaska.

19. "Day" means calendar day unless otherwise specified in this Consent Decree. In

computing any period of time under this Consent Decree, where the last day would fall on a

Saturday, Sunday or federal holiday, the period shall run until the close of business on the

next business day.

20. "Defendants" means GVEA and AIDEA.

7

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 14 of 67
21. "Dry Sorbent Injection" or "DSI" means an add-on air pollution control system in

which sorbent (e.g:, Trona, hydrated lime, sodium carbonate, etc.) is injected into the flue gas

stream upstream of a PM Control Device to react with and neutralize acid gases (such as SOZ

and hydrogen chloride) in the exhaust stream forming a dry powder material that maybe

removed in a primary or secondary PM Control Device.

22. "Emission Rate" for a given pollutant means the number of pounds of that

pollutant emitted per million British thermal units of heat input (lb/mmBTi~, measured in

accordance with this Consent Decree.

23. "Environmental Mitigation Project" or "Project" means the project set forth in

Section IX of this Consent Decree.

24. "EPA" means the United StatesEnvironmenta.l Protection Agency.

25. "First Fires Coal" or "First Firing of Coal" means the first day after which any

coal of any type or quantity is combusted in Unit 2.

26. "Fossil Fuel" means any hydrocarbon fuel, including coal, petroleum coke,

petroleum oil, or natural gas.

27. "GVEA" means Golden Valley Electric Association; Inc., and its wholly owned

subsidiaries.

28. "Healy Power Plant" means, solely for purposes of this Consent Decree, the

Healy Power Plant, consisting of the following pulverized coal-fired boilers designated as

Unit 1 (nominally 25 MVO and Unit 2 (nominally 50 MVO and related emission control

equipment, which is located in Healy, Alaska.

29. "lb/mmBTU" means pound per million British thermal units.

s

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association,, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 15 of 67
30. "Malfunction" means a failure to operate in a normal or usual manner by any air

pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process, which is sudden, infrequent,

and not reasonably preventable. Failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or

careless operation are not Malfunctions.

31. "Month" shall mean calendar month unless otherwise specified in this Consent

Decree.

32. "Netting" shall mean the process of determining whether a particular physical

change or change in the method, of operation of a major stationary source results in a "net

emissions increase," as that term is defined a~ 40 C.F.R. § 52.21(b)(3)(i) and in the Alaska

SIP.

33. "NOX".means oxides of nitrogen, measured in accordance with the provisions. of

this Consent Decree.

34. "Operational or Ownership Interest" means part or all of AIDEA's or GVEA's

legal or equitable ownership interest in any Unit ("Ownership Interest") or the-right to be the

operator (as that term is used and interpreted under the Act) of any Unit.

35. "Parties" means the United States of America on behalf of EPA, AIDEA and

GVEA. "Party" means one of the named "Parties."

36. "PM" means total filterable particulate matter, measured. in accordance with the

provisions of this Consent Decree.

37. "PM CEMS" or "PM Continuous Emission Monitoring System" means, for

obligations involving the monitoring of PM emissions under this Consent Decree, the ;

equipment that samples, analyzes, measures, and provides, by readings taken at frequent

intervals, an electronic and/or paper record of PM emissions.

9

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 16 of 67
38. "PM Control Device" means any device, including but not limited to, a Baghouse,

which reduces emissions of PM.

39. "PM Emission Rate" means the number of pounds of PM emitted per million

BTU of heat input (lb/mmBTU).

40. "Prevention of Significant Deterioration" or "PSD" means the Source

Review program within the meaning of Part C of Subchapter I of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7470-

7492 and 40 C.F.R. Part 52, and corresponding provisions of the federally enforceable

Alaska SIP.

41. "Project Dollars" means Defendants' expenditures and payments incurred or

made in carrying out the Environmental Mitigation Project identified in Section IX

(Environmental Mitigation Project) of this Consent Decree to the extent that such

expenditures or payments both: (a) comply with the requirements set forth in .Section IX of

this Consent Decree, and (b) constitute Defendants' direct payments for such projects, or

Defendants' external costs for contractors, vendors, and equipment.

42. "Regional Haze State Implementation Plan" or "Regional Haze SIP" means the

State Implementation Plan developed pursuant to section 169A and 169B of the CAA , 42

U.S.C. §§ 7491 and 7492.-7492 and 40 C.F.R. §§ 50.308 and 50.309.

43. "Retire" means that GVEA shall permanently shut down and cease to operate

Unit 1 such that it cannot legally burn any fuel nor produce any steam.-for electricity

production and that GVEA shall comply with applicable state and federal requirements for

permanently retiring acoal-fired electric generating unit, including removing Unit 1 from

Alaska's air emissions inventory and amending all applicable permits so as to reflect the

permanent shutdown status of Unit 1.

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 17 of 67
44. "SCR" or "Selective Catalytic Reduction" means an air pollution control device

for reducing NOX emissions in which ammonia (NH3) is added to the flue gas and then

passed through layers of a catalyst material. The ammonia and NOx in the flue gas stream

react on the surface of the catalyst, forming nitrogen (N2) and water vapor.

45. "SDA" or "Spray Dry Absorber" means the flue gas desulfurization equipment

used for removing SOZ and other acid gases from the flue gas and is currently installed on

Unit 2.

46. "SNCR" or "Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction" means a pollution control device

for the reduction of NOX emissions through the use of selective non-catalytic reduction

technology that utilizes ammonia or urea injection (or an equivalent reagent as approved by

EPA) into the boiler.

47. "S02" means sulfur dioxide, measured in accordance with the provisions of this

Consent Decree.

48. "State" means the State of Alaska.

49. "Title V Permit" means the Final Air Qualify Control Permit No.. AQ0173T'VP02

issued by the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation to GVEA orr February 3,

2012 pursuant to Subchapter V-of the Act, 42 U.S.C: §§ 7661-7661e.

50. "Unit 1" means the Foster-Wheeler Boiler pulverized coal-fired steam generator

including emission control equipment owned and operated by GVEA.

51. "Unit 2" means the TRW Integrated Entrained Combustion System pulverized

coal-fired steam generator, including emission control equipment, that is currently owned by

AIDEA.

it

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 18 of 67
52. "Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual Tonnage Limitation" means the sum of the tons of

pollutant in question emitted'from Unit 1 and Unit 2 including, without limitation; all tons of

that pollutant emitted during periods of startup, shutdown, .and Malfunction, in the designated

year.

53. "United States" means the United States of America, acting on behalf of EPA.

54. "Unit Operating Day" means, for Unit 1, any day on which Unit 1 fires Fossil

Fuel and for Unit 2, any day on which Unit 2 fires Fossil Fuel.

~~i~~r~a~r_:~~M~4

55. Within 30 days after the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree, GVEA, on behalf

of Defendants, shall pay to the United States a civil penalty in the amount of $115,000.00.

The civil penalty shall be paid by Electronic Funds Transfer ("EFT") to the United States

Deparhnent of Justice, in accordance with current EFT procedures, referencing DOJ Case

Number 90-5-2-1-10615, the civil action case name and case number assigned to this case.

The costs of such EFT shall be GVEA's responsibility. Payment shall be made in

accordance with instructions provided to GVEA by the Financial Litigation Unit of the U.S.

Attorney's Office for the District of Alaska. At the time of payment, GVEA shall provide

notice of payment, referencing the DOJ Case Number, and the civil action case. name and

case number, to the Department of Justice and to EPA in accordance with Section XIX

(Notices) of this Consent Decree.

56. Failure to timely pay the civil penalty shall subject GVEA to interest accruing

from the date payment is due until the.date payment is made at the rate prescribed by 28

U.S.C. § 1961, and shall render GVEA liable for all charges, costs, fees, .and penalties

established by law for the benefit of a creditor or of the United States in securing payment.

12

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 19 of 67
57. Payments made pursuant to this Section are penalties within the meaning of

Section 162(fl of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 162(fl, and are not tax-deductible

expenditures for purposes of federal law.

V. NO4 EMISSION REDUCTIONS AND CONTROLS

58. Upon Defendants' First Firing of Coal at Unit 2, Defendants shall achieve and

maintain at Unit 2 a 30-Day Rolling Average NOX Emission Rate of no greater than 0.325

lb/mmBTU.

59. Defendants shall install an SCR at Unit 2 on or before September 30, 2016, or 24

months after Unit 2 First Fires Coal, whichever is later. Continuing thereafter, Defendants

shall Continuously Operate such SCR at Unit 2 so that it achieves and maintains a 30-Day

Rolling Average NOX Emission.Rate of no greater than 0.0801b/mmBTU.

60. GVEA shall install an SNCR at Unit 1 on or before September 30, 2015, or 18

months after Unit 2 First Fires Coal, whichever is later. Continuing thereafter, GVEA shall

Continuously Operate such SNCR so that it achieves and maintains a 30-Day Rolling

Average NOX Emission Rate of no greater than 0.201b/mmBTU until GVEA either retires

Unit 1 pursuant to Paragraph 62 or installs an SCR at Unit 1 pursuant to Paragraph 63.

61.On or before December 31, 2022, GVEA shall elect to (a) Retire Unit 1 or (b)

install and operate an SCR at Unit 1 (or an alternative control technology approved by EPA)

as provided in Paragraph 63. GVEA shall provide Notice of such election pursuant to

Section XIX (Notices).

62. If GVEA elects to Retire Unit 1 pursuant to Paragraph 61, GVEA shall Retire

Unit 1 by no later than December 31, 2024.

13

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 20 of 67
63. If GVEA elects to continue to operate Unit 1 pursuant to Paragraph 61, then

GVEA shall install an SCR at Unit 1 (or an alternative control technology approved by EPA)

commencing on December 31, 2024. Continuing thereafter, GVEA shall Continuously

Operate such SCR (or alternative control technology approved by EPA) so that it achieves

and maintains a 30-Day Rolling Average NOX Emission. Rate of no greater than 0.070

lb/mmBTU.

B. Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual NO Tonna Limitation

64. Unit 1 and Unit 2 shall operate so as not to exceed the following Unit 1 and Unit 2

Annual NOX Tonnage Limitation:

For Each 12-Month Period, Beginning Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual NOz Tonnage

on January 1St, within the Dates Limitation:

Specified

Below:

1,239

For the. first full year of operation following

installation of SNCR on Unit 1

533

For the first full year of operation following

installation of SCR on Unit 2 throu 2024

352

For the first full year of operation following

installation of SCR on Unit 1

231

For the first full year of operation following

retirement of Unit 1

C. Monitorin of NO Emissions

In determining a 30-Day Rolling Average NOX Emission Rate, Defendants shall use NOX

emission data obtained from a CEMS in accordance with the procedures of 40 C.F.R. Part

60, and flow monitoring devices necessary to calculate compliance with the Unit 1 and Unit

2 Annual Tonnage Limitation.

14

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et a1.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 21 of 67
VI. SO, EMISSION REDUCTIONS: AND- CONTROLS

A. Installation, Operation and Performance SO, Requirements

65. Commencing on the Day that Unit 2 First Fires and continuing thereafter,

Defendants shall Continuously Operate the existing SDA on Unit 2 so that it achieves and

maintains a 30-Day Rolling Average S02 Emission Rate of no greater than O.10 lb/mmBTU.

66. Commencing September 30, 2015 or 18 months after Unit 2 First Fires Coal;

whichever is later, and continuing thereafter, Defendants shall Continuously Operate the

existing DSI at Unit 1 so that it achieves and maintains a 30-Day Rolling Average S02

Emission Rate of no greater 0.301b/mmBTU: -

B. Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual S0 e Limitation

67. Unit 1 and Unit 2 shall operate so as not to exceed the following Unit 1 and Unit 2

Annual SOZ Tonnage Limitation:

For Each 12-Month Period, Beginning on Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual S02 Tonnage

January 1St, within the Dates Specified Limitation:

Below:.:

January 1, 2016 and continuing each 12- 701

month period thereafter

If Unit 1 is Retired pursuant to Paragraph 248

62: January 1 of the calendar year after

the retirement and continuing each 12-

monthperiod thereafter

C. Monitorin of S0 Emissions

68. In determining a.30-Day Rolling Average S02 Emission Rate, Defendants shall

use S02 emission data. obtained from a CEMS accordance with the procedures of

40 C.F.R. Part 60, and flow monitoring devices necessary to calculate the Unit 1 and Unit 2

Annual Tonnage Limitation.

15

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et a1.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 22 of 67
YII. PM EMISSION I~F.DUCTIONS ~Nl~ CONTROLS

A. Optimization of Baghouses

69. Commencing upon the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree for Unit 1, and

continuing thereafter, GVEA shall Continuously Operate the. Baghouse on Unit 1.

70. Except as required during correlation testing under 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix B,

Performance Specification 11, and Quality Assurance Requirements under Appendix F,

Procedure ~, as required bythis Consent Decree, GVEA for Unit 1 and Defendants far Unit 2

shall Continuously Operate; at a minimum, to the extent practicable: each compartment of

the Baghouse for Unit 1 and Unit 2 (regardless of whether those actions-are needed to

comply with opacity limits); repair any failed Baghouse compartment at the next planned

Unit outage (or unplanned outage of sufficient length); and maintain and replace bags on

each Baghouse for Unit 1 and Unit 2 as needed to maximize collection efficiency, where

applicable.

B. Operation and Performance Requirements for PM Controls

71. Commencing on the Day that Unit 2 First Fires Coal, Defendants shall

Continuously Operate the existing Baghouse at Unit 2 so that it achieves. and maintains a 30-

Day Rolling Average Filterable PM Emission Rate of no greater than. 0.0200 lb/mmBTU.

72. Commencing September 30, 2015 ar 18 months after Unit 2 First Fires Coal,

whichever is later, GVEA shall Continuously Operate the existing Baghouse at Unit 1 so that

it achieves and maintains a 30-Day Rolling Average Filterable PM Emission Rate of no

greater than 0.02001b/mmB'TLJ.

16

United States v. Golden Malley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 23 of 67
' \l 1l .

73. Defendants with respect to Unit 2 and GVEA with respect to Unit 1; shall install,

correlate, maintain, and operate'PM CEMS on Units 1 and 2 as specified below. The PM

CEMS shall be comprised of a continuous particlemassmonitor measuring filterable

particulate matter concentration, directly or indirectly, on an hourly average basis and a

diluent monitor used to convert the concentration to units expressed in lb/mmBTU. The PM

CEMS installed at Unit 2 must be appropriate for the anticipated stack conditions and

capable of measuring filterable PM concentrations on an hourly average basis. Defendants

-shall maintain, in an electronic database that maintains data. for at least five years, the hourly

average emission values of all PM CEMS in lb/mmBTU. Except for periods of monitor

malfunction, maintenance, repair, calibration, or testing as identified in Defendants' PM

CEMS protocols prepared pursuant to Paragraphs 77 and 78; GVEA shall Continuously

Operate the PM CEMS at all times when the Unit it serves is operating.

74. Not later than upon First Riring of Coal in Unit 2, Defendants on Unit 2 and

GCEA on Unit.1 shall install, correlate, maintain, and operate PM GEMS on Unit 1 and Unit

2 in accordance with 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 11.

75: Within 180 days of the Date of Entry, Defendants shall submit to EPA a plan for

the installation and correlation of the PM GEMS.

76. Within 365 days of the Date of Entry, Defendants shall submit to EPA a Quality

Assurance/Quality Control ("QA/QC") protocol that shall be followed for such PM CEMS.

77. In developing both the plan for installation and correlation of the PM CEMS and

the QA/QC protocol, Defendants shall use the criteria set forth in 40 C.F.R. Part 60,

Appendix B, Performance Specification 11, and Appendix F, Procedure 2. After PM CEMS

17

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 24 of 67
is installed, Defendants shall thereafter operate the PM CEMS in accordance with the plan

and QA/QC protocol.

78. By no later than the Day Unit 2 First Fires Coal, except for .periods of monitor

malfunction, maintenance, repair, calibration, testing as identified in Defendants' PM

GEMS protocols prepared pursuant to Paragraphs 77 and 78, Defendants shall install,

correlate, maintain, and Continuously Operate. the PM CEMS when the Unit. it serves is

operating, conduct performance specification tests on the PM CEMS, and demonstrate

compliance with the PM GEMS installation and correlation plans submitted to EPA.

Defendants shall report; pursuant to Section XII (Periodic. Reporting), the data recorded by

the PM GEMS during Unit operation, expressed in lb/mmBTU on a rolling average 30-day

basis in compact disc- electronic format to EPA and identify in the report any PM emission

rates in excess of the applicable PM Emission Rate and any concentrations measured by the

PM CEMS that are greater than 125% of the highest PM concentration level used in the most

recent correlation testing performed pursuant to Performance. Specification 11 in 40 C.F.R.

Part 60, Appendix B.

79. Compliance with the PM Emission Rates established by this Consent Decree shall

be determined using CEMS data obtained in accordance with Paragraphs 78 and 79. Data

from PM CEMS shall be used to monitor compliance with PM Emission Rates established by

this Consent Decree on a continuous basis:

80. Nothing in this Consent Decree is intended to, or shall, alter or waive any

applicable law (including but not limited to any defenses, entitlements, challenges,; ar

1s

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et a1.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 25 of 67
clarifications related to the Credible Evidence Rule, 62 Fed. Reg...8314 (Feb. 24, 1997))

concerning the use of data for any purpose under the Act.

II 'CI.It I~I~U 1~ 1 ICI

81. Except as provided in Paragraph 83, emission reductions that result from actions -.

to betaken by Defendants after the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree to comply with the

requirements of this Consent Decree shall not be considered as a creditable contemporaneous

emission decrease for the purpose of obtaining a Netting credit or offset under the Act's

Nonattainment NSR and PSD programs.

82. The limitations on the generation and use of Netting credits and offsets set forth. in

the previous Paragraph do not apply to emission reductions achieved by Unit 1 and Unit 2

that are greater than those required under this Consent Decree.. For purposes of this

Paragraph, emission reductions from Unit 1 and Unit 2 are greater than those required under

this Consent Decree if they result from such Unit's compliance with federally-enforceable

emission limits that are more stringent than those limits imposed on the Unit under this

Consent Decree anti under applicable provisions of the Act or the Alaska SIP. Nothing in

this Consent Decree is intended to preclude the emission reductions generated"under this

Consent Decree from being considered by EPA or the applicable state for the purposes of:

attainment demonstrations submitted pursuant to Section 110 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410;

determining impacts on National Ambient Air Quality Standards, PSD_ increment, or air

quality related values, including visibility, in a Class I area; Best Available Retrofit

Technology ("BART") determinations pursuant to Section 169A(g)(2) of the CAA, 42

U.S.C. § 7491(g)(2); and reasonable progress portions of the Alaska Regional Haze State

Implementation Plan.

19

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 26 of 67
83. GVEA, on behalf of Defendants, shall fund as an Environmental Mitigation

Project a change out program for solid-fuel burning devices, including wood or coal stoves,

wood or coal-fired furnaces, wood or coal-fired hydronic heaters, or fireplace inserts ("Stove

Change Out Project" or "Stove Project") in compliance with the approved plans and schedules

for such Project and the other terms of this Consent Decree.

84. GVEA shall spend a total of $250,000 in Project Dollars. on a Stove Change. Out

Project for municipalities in Interior Alaska, specifically the Fairbanks North Star Borough

and Denali Borough (collectively "the Boroughs"). GVEA shall spend no less than $175,000

of the Project Dollars by providing funds to the Fairbanks North Star Borough Air Quality

Division ("FNSB") for the express purpose of funding FNSB's existing Change Out Program

for solid-fuel burning devices such as stoves ("FNSB Program"). GVEA shall spend no less

than $75,000 in Project Dollars on a Stove Project for the Denali. Borough ("Denali") that

meets the requirements of the FNSB Program. After providing notification to EPA pursuant

to Section XIX (Notices), the allocation of Project Dollars between FNSB and Denali may be

changed. by GVEA if one of the Boroughs is unwilling or unable to spend Project Dollars on

the Stove Change Out Project in compliance with the terms and conditions of this Consent

Decree.

85. To the extent that a Borough is willing to participate in the Stove Change Out

Project under this Consent Decree, GVEA shall provide to the United States within 90 days

of the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree certification from that participating Borough

stating that: the Borough shall spend all of its Project Dollars provided by GVEA

exclusively and solely on the Project; the Borough shall limit the use of its Project Dollars

20

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 27 of 67
for administrative costs associated with the Stove Project to no greater than 10% of the

Project Dollars GVEA provides; the Borough shall implement the Stove Project consistent

with the materials available on EPA's website at http://www.epa.gov/burnwise; the Borough

shall prepare true and accurate reports for GVEA's use in complying with this Consent

Decree, to the extent GVEA requests the Borough to do so; and the Borough shall direct

Project Dollars to the Stove Change Out Project, such that all Project Dollars, to the best of

the Borough's ability, are expended by no later than December 31, 2014 or twenty-four (24)

months following the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree whichever is later.

86. GVEA sha11 pay $87,500 to FNSB and $37,500 to Denali within 120 days of the Date

of Entry of this Consent Decree for the Implementation of the Change Out Program, consistent

with this Consent Decree and the Boroughs' certifications. Within 365. days of the Date of Entry

of this Consent Decree; GVEA shall pay $87,500 of Project Dollars to FNSB and $37,500 in

Project Dollaxs to Denali. GVEA shall not include its own personnel costs as a credit ar

offset for the Project Dollars to be paid to the Boroughs to implement the Stove. Project.

87. All plans and reports .prepared by GVEA pursuant to the requirements. of this

Section IX of the Consent Deeree and required to be submitted to EPA shall be publicly

available from GVEA without charge.

88. While GVEA intends to have the Stove Change Out Project carried out by the

Boroughs, GVEA acknowledges that GVEA will receive credit for the expenditure of such

funds as Project Dollars only if GVEA demonstrates that the funds have been actually spent

by the Boroughs, and that such expenditures met all requirements of this Consent Decree.

Nothing in this settlement shall be construed to prohibit a contractual allocation of liability

21

United States v. Golden i~alley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 28 of 67
between the Boroughs and GVEA, should the Boroughs fail to spend the Project Dollars in

accordance with the certification that it provided to the Parties to this Consent Decree.

89. Beginning one hundred eighty (180) days from the Date of Entry of this Consent

Decree, and continually annually thereafter until completion of the Project, GVEA shall

provide EPA with written reports (which maybe prepared by the Boroughs) detailing the:

progress of the Stove.Project, including an accounting of Project Dollars spent to date.

90. Within 60 Days following the completion of the Project required under this

Consent Decree GVEA shall submit to the United States a report, which maybe prepared by

the Boroughs, that documents: the date that the Stove Project was. completed, i.e., when all

of the Project Dollars-were spent by the Boroughs; the results of implementing the Stoye

Project; including the emission reductions or other environmental benefits achieved; and the

Project Dollars expended by the Boroughs in implementing the Stove Project.

X. MERCURY

91. GVEA stipulates that Unit 1 and Unit 2 at the Healy Power Plant shall comply

with the requirements for. mercury emissions from existing coal-fired electric generating.

units established by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From

Coal and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating. Units, 40 C.F.R. Part 63, Subpart

UUIJ[JU (the "MATS Rule").

92. GVEA shall make available to the National Park Service ("NPS") the results of

any mercury emissions monitoring required by law conducted on Unit 1 and Unit 2 within 45

days of receiving a request for such data from the NPS.

93. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed or interpreted to relieve GVEA

of any requirements in the MATS Rule that may otherwise apply to Unit 1 or Unit 2 of the

22

United States v. Golden i~alley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 29 of 67
Healy Power Plant, including requirements that might apply to emissions of other hazardous

air pollutants from Unit 1 or Unit 2:

t 1 ~ 1 /I ►l .

94. Entry of this Consent Decree shall resolve all civil claims of the United States

against AIDEA and GVEA that are {1) alleged in the Complaint, specifically claims under

Section 167 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7477, that arise from the proposed modification,

proposed restart, and/or proposed reactivation of.Unit 2 at the Healy.Power Plant, and (2)

claims that arise, prior to the Date of Lodging of this Consent Decree, from the proposed

modification, proposed restart, and/or proposed reactivation of Unit 2 at the HealyPower

Plant under any or all of: (a) Part C and D of Subchapter I of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7470-

7492, 7501-7515, and the implementing PSD and Nonattainment NSR provisions of the

Alaska SIP; (b) Section 111 ofthe Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7411, and 40 C.F.R. § 60:14; and (c)

Title V of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7661-7661f, but only to the extent that such Title V claims are

based on Defendants'. failure to obtain terms in the Title V Permit that reflect applicable

requirements imposed under Part C or D of Subchapter I of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7470-7492,

7501.-7515, and the implementing PSD and Nonattainment NSR provisions of the Alaska

SIP.

/ C 1 1 C' 1 C I~

95. After the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree, GVEA for Unit 1 and Defendants

far Unit 2 shall submit to the United States a periodic report, within 60 Days after the end of

each half of the calendar year (January through June and July through December): The

report shall include the following information:

23

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 30 of 67
a. all information necessary to determine compliance during the reporting period

with: all applicable 30-Day Rolling Average NOX Emission Rates and 30-Day

Rolling Average S02 Emission Rates; all applicable PM Emission Rates; all

applicable Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual Tonnage Limitations; the obligation to ,.

monitor NOX, SO2, and PM emissions; and the obligation to optimize PM

emission controls;

b. the schedule for the installation or upgrade and commencement of operation of

new or upgraded pollution control devices required by this Consent Decree,.

including the nature and cause of any actual. or anticipated delays,. and any steps

taken by Defendants to mitigate such delay;

c. the date on which Unit 2 First Fires Coal;

d. all afFrmative defenses asserted pursuant to Paragraphs 110 through 118 during

the period covered by the progress report; and

e. an identification of all periods when any pollution control device required by this

Consent Decree to Continuously Operate did not Continuously Operate, the

reasons) for the equipment not operating, and the basis for Defendants'

compliance or non-compliance with the Continuous Operation requirements of

this Consent Decree.

96. In any periodic report submitted pursuant to this Section XII, Defendants may

incorporate by reference information previously submitted under its Title V permitting

requirements, provided that Defendants attach the Title V Permit report (or the pertinent

portions of such report) and provide a specific reference to the .provisions of the, Title. V

Permit report that are responsive to the information required in the periodic report.

24

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 31 of 67
97. In addition to the reports required pursuant to this Section XII, if Defendants

violate or deviate from any provision of this Consent Decree, Defendants shall submit to

United States a report on the violation or deviation within 10 business days after Defendants

knew or by the exercise of due diligence should have known of the event. In the report,

Defendants shall explain the cause or causes of the violation or deviation and any measures

taken or to be taken by Defendants to cure the reported violation or deviation or to prevent

such violation or deviation in the future. If at any time, the provisions of this Consent Decree

are included in Title V Permits, consistent with the requirements for such inclusion in this

Consent Decree, then the deviation reports required under applicable Title V regulations shall

be deemed to satisfy all the requirements of this Paragraph.

98. Each of Defendants' reports shall be signed by the Responsible Official as defined

in Title V of the Act for the Healy Power Plant, as appropriate, and shall contain the

following certification:

This information was prepared either by me or under my direction or supef-vision

in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly

gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my evaluation, or the

direction and my inquiry of the persons) who manage the system, or the

persons) directly responsible for gathering the information, I hereby certify

under penalty of law that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information

is true, accurate, and complete. I understand that there are significant penalties

for submitting false, inaccurate, or misleading information to the United States.

~__ /_I_ . -III ~_ ~ • C 1 - 1 _ _ J. ►/_I_ _ ~~rf.

99. Defendants shall submit each plan, report, or other submission required by this

Consent Decree to United States whenever such a document is required to be submitted for

review or approval pursuant to this Consent Decree. To the extent EPA approval is required,

EPA may approve the submittal or decline to approve it and provide written comments

25

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 32 of 67
explaining the basis for declining such approval as soon as reasonably practicable. Within 60

Days of receiving written comments from EPA, Defendants shall either: (a) revise the

submittal consistent with the written comments and provide the revised submittal to EPA; or

(b) submit the-matter for dispute resolution, including the period of informal negotiations,

under Section XVI (Dispute Resolution) of this Consent Decree.

100. Upon receipt of EPA's final approval of the submittal, or upon completion

of the submittal pursuant to dispute resolution, Defendants shall implement the approved

submittal in accordance with the schedule specified therein or another EPA-approved

schedule or as resolved at the completion of the Dispute Resolution process.

XIV. STIPiTT.ATED PENALTIES

101. For .any failure by Defendants to comply with the terms of this Consent

Decree, and subject to the provisions of Sections XV .(Force Majeure) and XVI (Dispute

Resolution), Defendants shall pay, within 30 Days after receipt of written demand to

Defendants by the United States, the following stipulated penalties to the United States:

26

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 33 of 67
Consent Decree Violation Stipulated .Penalty

a. Failure to pay the civil penalty as specified in Section IV $5,000 per Day

(Civil Penalty) of this Consent Decree

b. Failure to comply with any applicable 30-Day Rolling $1,250 per Day per violation

Average NOX Emission Rate, 30-Day Rolling Average S02 ~'~'here the violation is less than

Emission Rate, or 30-Day Rolling Average PM Emission 5% in excess of the lb/mmBTU

Rate limits

$2,500 per Day per violation

where the violation is equal to

or greater than 5%but less than

10% in excess of the

lb/mmBTU limits

$5,000 per Day per violation

where the violation is equal to

or greater than 10% in excess of

the lb/mmBTL7limits

c. Failure to comply with the applicable Unit 1 and Unit 2 $2,500 per ton for first 100 tons,

Annual NOX Tonnage Limitation established by this $5,000 per ton for each

Consent Decree additional ton above 100 tons,

plus the payment of $2,500 per

ton for an amount of tons equal

to two times the number of tons

of NOX emitted that exceeded

the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual

NOX Tonnage Limitation on

Units 1 and 2

d. Failure to comply with the applicable Unit 1 and Unit 2 $2,500 per ton for the first 100

Annual Tonnage Limitation for S02 required by this tons over the limit, and $5,000

Consent Decree per ton for each additional ton

_ over the limit, plus the payment

of $1,250 per ton for an amount

of tons equal to two times the

number of tons of S02 emitted

that exceeded the Unit 1 and

Unit 2 Annual Tonnage

Limitation on Units 1 and 2

27

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 34 of 67
e. Failure to install and commence Continuous Operation, $5,000 per Day per violation

or Continuously Operate an NOX, 502, or PM control device during the first 30 Days;

as required under this Consent Decree $19,000 per Day per violation

thereafter

f. Failure to Retire Unit 1, if elected, as required under this . $5,000 per Day during the first

Consent Decree 30 Days; .$19,000 per Day

thereafter

g. Failure to install or operate NOX, 502, andlor PM CEMS $500 per Day per violation

as required in this Consent Decree

h. Failure to apply for any permit required by Section XVII $500 per Day per violation

(Permits)

i. Failure to timely submit, modify, or implement, as $375 per Day per violation

approved, the reports, plans, studies, analyses, protocols, or during the first 10 Days; $500

other submittals required by this Consent Decree per Day per violation thereafter

j. Failure to optimize Baghouses as required by Paragraph $500 per Day per violation

71

k. Any other violation of this Consent Decree $500 per Day per violation

102. Violation of any limit based on a 30-Day rolling average constitutes 30

Days of violation but where such a violation (for the same pollutant and from the same Unit)

recurs within periods less than 30 Days, Defendants shall not be obligated to pay a daily

stipulated penalty for any Day of the recurrence for which a stipulated penalty has already

been paid...

103. All stipulated penalties shall begin to accrue on the Day after the

.performance is due oz on the Day a violation occurs, whichever is applicable, and shall

continue to accrue until performance is satisfactorily completed or until the violation ceases,

whichever. is applicable. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall prevent the simultaneous

accrual of separate stipulated penalties for separate violations of this Consent Decree.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Consent Decree, the United States may, in its

2s

United States v. Golden i~alley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 35 of 67
unreviewable discretion, waive all or any part of any stipulated penalties which may have

accrued pursuant to this Consent Decree.

104. Defendants shall pay all stipulated penalties to the United States within 30

Days of receipt of written demand to Defendants from the United States, and shall continue

to make such payments every 30 Days thereafter until the violations) no longer continues,

unless Defendants elect within 20 Days of receipt of written demand to Defendants from the

United States to dispute the accrual of stipulated penalties in accordance with the provisions

in Section XVI (Dispute Resolution) of this Consent Decree.

105. Stipulated penalties shall continue. to accrue as provided in accordance

with Paragraph 104 during any dispute, with interest on accrued stipulated penalties payable

and calculated at the rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1961, but need not be paid until the following:

a. If the dispute is resolved by agreement, or by a decision of the United States

pursuant to Section XVI (Dispute Resolution) of this Consent Decree that is not

appealed. to .the Court, accrued stipulated penalties agreed or determined to be

owing, together with accrued interest,. shall be paid within 30 Days"of the.

effective date of the agreement or of the. receipt of the United States' decision;

b. If the dispute is appealed to the Court and the United States prevails in whole or

in part, Defendants shall, within 30 Days of receipt of the Court's decision or

order, pay all accrued stipulated. penalties determined by the Court to be owing,

together with interest accrued on such penalties determined by the Court to be

owing, except as provided in Subparagraph c, below;.

►~~

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 36 of 67
c. If the Court's decision is appealed by either Party, Defendants shall, within 15

Days of receipt of the final appellate court decision, pay all accrued stipulated.

penalties determined to be owing, together with interest accrued on such

stipulated penalties determined to be owing by the appellate court.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Consent Decree,, the accrued stipulated penalties

agreed by the United States and Defendants, or determined by the United States through Dispute

Resolution, to be owing maybe less than the stipulated penalty amounts set forth in Paragraph

102.

106. All monetary stipulated penalties shall be paid in the manner set forth in

Section IV (Civil Penalty) of this Consent Decree.

107. Should Defendants fail to pay stipulated penalties in compliance with the

terms of this Consent Decree, the United States shall be entitled to collect interest on such

penalties, as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

108. The stipulated penalties provided for in this Consent Decree shall be in

addition to any other rights, remedies, or sanctions available to the United States by reason of

Defendants' failure to comply with any requirement of this Consent Decree or applicable

law, except that for any violation of the Act for which this Consent Decree provides for

payment of a stipulated penalty, Defendants shall be allowed a credit for stipulated penalties

paid against any statutory penalties also imposed for such violation.

109. Affirmative Defense as to Stipulated Penalties for Excess Emissions

Occurring During Malfunctions: If any of Defendants' Units exceed an applicable 30-Day

Rolling Average Emission Rate for PM, NOX or SOZ, or fail to meet a Continuously Operate

30

United States v. Golden i~alley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 37 of 67
requirement set forth in this Consent Decree due to a claimed Malfunction, Defendants,

bearing the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, have an affirmative defense

to stipulated penalties under this Consent Decree if Defendants have complied with the

reporting requirements of Paragraphs 115 through 116 and have demonstrated all of the

following:

a. the excess emissions or failure to Continuously Operate was/were caused by a

sudden, unavoidable breakdown of technology, beyond Defendants' control;

b. the excess emissions or failure to Continuously Operate (1) did not stem from any

activity or event that could have been foreseen and avoided, or planned for, and

(2) could not have been avoided by better operation and maintenance practices in

accordance with manufacturers' specifications and recommendations and good

engineering and maintenance practices;

c. to the maximum extent practicable, the air pollution control equipment and

processes were maintained and operated in a manner consistent with approved

plans, QA/QC procedures, manufacturers' specifications and recommendations,

and good engineering and maintenance practices for minimizing emissions;' `

d. repairs to equipment and processes were made in an expeditious fashion when

such repairs were needed to prevent the exceedance of an emission limit or the

shutdown of air pollution control equipment. Off-shift labor and overtime must

have been utilized, to the extent practicable, to ensure that such repairs were made

as expeditiously as practicable;

e. the amount and duration of the excess emissions (including any bypass) were

minimized to the maximum extent practicable during periods of such emissions,

31

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 38 of 67
and consistent- with manufacturers' specifications and recommendations and good

engineering and maintenance practices;

f. all possible steps were. taken to minimize the excess emissions in accordance. with

approved plans, QA/QC protocols, manufacturers' specifications and

recommendations, and good engineering and maintenance practices;

g, all emission monitoring systems were kept in operation if at all possible and in

accordance with approved plans, QA/QC protocols, manufacturers' specifications

and recommendations, and good engineering and maintenance practices;

h. Defendants' actions in response to the excess emissions were documented by

properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence;

i. the excess emissions were not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate

design, operation, or maintenance; and -

j. Defendants .properly and promptly notified EPA as required by this Consent

Decree.

110. To assert an affirmative defense for Malfunction under Paragraph 110,

Defendants shall submit actual emissions data for the Day the Malfunction occurred and the

29-Day period following the Day the Malfunction occurred. Defendants may, if they elect,

submit emissions data. for the same 30-Day period but that excludes the excess emissions.

111. AfFrmative Defense as to Stipulated Penalties for Excess Emissions

Occurring D~ Sg tartup and Shutdown: If any of Defendants' Units exceed an applicable

30-Day Rolling Average Emission Rate for PM, NOX or S02 set forth in this Consent Decree

due to startup or shutdown, Defendants, bearing the burden of proof by a preponderance of

the evidence, have an affirmative defense to stipulated penalties under this Consent Decree,

32

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 39 of 67
if Defendants have complied with the reporting requirements of Paragraphs 115 through 116

and have demonstrated all of the following:

a. the periods of excess emissions that occurred during startup and shutdown were

short and infrequent and could not have been prevented through careful planning

and design consistent with good engineering and maintenance practices and

manufacturers' specifications and recommendations;

b. the excess emissions were not part of a recurring pattern indicative of inadequate

design, operation, or maintenance or which could have been prevented by

following manufacturers' specifications and recommendations and good .

engineering and. maintenance practices;

c. if the excess emissions were caused by a bypass (an intentional diversion of

control equipment), then the bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life,.

personal injury, or severeproperty damage;

d. at all times, the facility was operated in a manner consistent with good

engineering and maintenance practices and manufacturers' specifications. and

recommendations for minimizing emissions;

e. the frequency and duration of operation in startup or shutdown mode was

minimized to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with good

engineering and maintenance practices and manufacturers' .specifications and

recommendations;

f. all possible steps were taken to minimize the excess emissions in accordance with

approved plans, QA/QC protocols, manufacturers' specifications and

recommendations, and good engineering and maintenance practices;

33

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 40 of 67
g. all emissions monitoring systems were kept in operation if at all possible and in

accordance with approved plans, QA/QC protocols, manufacturers' specifications

and recommendations, and good engineering and maintenance practices;

h. Defendants' actions during the period of excess emissions were documented by

properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence; and

i. Defendants properly and promptly notified EPA as required by this Consent

Decree.

ll2. To assert an affirmative defense for startup or shutdown under Paragraph

112, Defendants shall submit actual emissions data for the Day the excess emissions from

startup or shutdown occurred and the 29-Day period following the Day the excess emissions

from startup or shutdown occurred. Defendants may, if elected, submit emissions data. for. the

same 30-Day period but that excludes the excess- emissions.

113. If excess emissions. occurred due to a Malfunction during routine startup

and shutdown, then those instances shall be treated as other Malfunctions subject to

Paragraph-110.

114. For an affirmative defense under Paragraphs 110 and 112, Defendants,

bearing the burden of proof, shall demonstrate, through submission of the data and

information under the reporting provisions of this Section, that all reasonable and practicable

measures in accordance with good engineering and maintenance practices and within

Defendants' control were implemented to prevent the occurrence of the excess emissions.

l 15. Defendants shall provide notice to United States in writing of Defendants'

intent to assert an affirmative defense for Malfunction, startup, or. shutdown under

Paragraphs 110 and 112, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 21 Days following

34

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 41 of 67
the date of the Malfunction, startup or shutdown. This notice shall be submitted pursuant to

the provisions of Section XIX (Notices). The notice shall contain:

a. the identity of each stack or other emission point where the excess emissions

occurred;

b. the magnitude of the excess emissions expressed in lb/mmBTU and the operating

data and calculations used in determining the magnitude of the excess emissions;

c. the time and duration or expected duration of the. excess emissions or failure to

Continuously Operate;

d. the identity of the equipment causing the excess emissions failure to

Continuously Operate;

e. the nature and suspected cause of the excess emissions or failure to Continuously

Operate;

f. the steps taken, if the excess emissions or failure to Continuously Operate were

the result of a Malfunction, to remedy the Malfunction and the steps taken or

planned to prevent the recurrence of the Malfunction;

g. the steps that were or are being taken to limit the excess emissions limit the

duration of the failure to Continuously Operate; and

h. if applicable, a list of the steps taken to comply with permit conditions governing

Unit operation during periods of startup, shutdown, and/or Malfunction.

116. A Malfunction, startup, or shutdown shall not constitute a Force Majeure

Event unless the Malfunction; startup, or shutdown also meets the definition of a Force

Majeure Event, as provided Section XV (Force Majeure):

35

United States v. Golden Va11ey Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 42 of 67
117. The affirmative defense provided herein is only an affirmative defense to

stipulated penalties for violations of this Consent Decree, and not a defense to any civil or

administrative action for injunctive relief.

t: u: 1 1:

118. For purposes of this Consent Decree, a "Force Majeure Event" shall mean

an event that has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the control of Defendants,

its contractors, or any entity controlled by Defendants that delays compliance with any

provision of this Consent Decree or otherwise causes a violation of any provision of this

Consent Decree despite Defendants' best efforts to fulfill the obligation. "Best efforts to

fulfill the obligation" include using the best efforts to anticipate any potential Force Majeure

Event and to address the effects of any such event (a) as it is .occurring and (b) after it has

occurred, such that the delay and any adverse environmental effect of the delay or violation is

minimized to the greatest extent possible.

119. Notice of Force Majeure Events. If any event occurs or has occurred that

may delay compliance with or otherwise cause a violation of any obligation under this

Consent Decree, as to which Defendants intend to assert a claim of Force Majeure,

Defendants shall notify United States in writing as soon as practicable, but in no event later

than 21 Days following the date Defendants first knew, or by the exercise of due diligence

should have known, that the event caused or may cause such delay or violation. In this

notice, Defendants shall reference this Paragraph of this Consent Decree and describe the

anticipated length of time that the delay or violation may persist; the cause or causes of the

delay or violation; all measures taken or to betaken by Defendants to prevent or minimize

the delay or violation; the schedule by which Defendants propose to implement those

36

United States v. Golden Talley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 43 of 67
measures; and Defendants' rationale for attributing the delay or violation to a Force Majeure

Event. Defendants shall include with any notice all available documentation supporting'the

claim that the delay was attributable to a Force Majeure Event. Defendants shall adopt all

reasonable measures to avoid or minimize such delays or violations. Defendants shall be

deemed to know of any circumstance which Defendants, its contractors, or any entity

controlled by Defendants knew or should have known.

120. Failure to Give Notice. If Defendants fail to comply with the notice

requirements of this Section, the United States may void Defendants" claim for Force

Majeure as to the specific event for which Defendants have failed to comply with such notice

requirement.

121'. United St ates' Response. The United States shall notify Defendants in

writing regarding Defendants' claim of Force Majeure within 30 Days after receipt of the

notice provided in Paragraph 120: If the United States agrees that a delay in performance has

been or will be caused by a Force Majeure Event, the United States and Defendants shall

stipulate to an extension of deadlines) for performance of the affected compliance

requirements) by a period equal to the delay actually caused by the event. In such

circumstances, an appropriate modification shall be made pursuant to Section XXIII

(Modification) of this Consent Decree.

122. Disagreement. If the United States does not accept Defendants' claim of

Force Majeure, or if the United States and Defendants cannot agree on the length of the delay

actually caused by the Force Majeure Event, the matter shall be resolved in accordance with

Section XVI (Dispute Resolution) of this Consent Decree.

37

United States v. Golden i~alley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 44 of 67
123. Burden of Proof. In any dispute regarding Force Majeure, Defendants

shall bear the burden_ of proving that any delay. in performance or other violation of any

requirement of this Consent Decree was caused by or will be caused by a Force Majeure

Event. Defendants shall also bear the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence

that Defendants gave the notice required by this Section and the burden of proving the

anticipated duration and extent of any delays) attributable to a Force Majeure Event. An

extension of one compliance date based on a particular event may, but will not necessarily,

result in an extension of a subsequent compliance date.

124. Events Excluded. Unanticipated or increased costs or expenses associated

with the performance of Defendants' obligations under this Consent Decree shall not

constitute a Force Majeure Event.. Force Majeure also does not include Defendants' financial

inability to perform any obligation under this Consent Decree.

125. Potential Force Majeure Events. The Parties agree that, depending upon

the circumstances related to an event and the Defendants' response to such circumstances,

the kinds of events listed below are among those that could qualify as Force Majeure Events

within the meaning of this Section: construction, labor, or equipment delays; Malfunction of

a Unit or emission. control or monitoring device; unanticipated coal. supply or pollution

control reagent delivery interruptions; acts of God; acts of war or terrorism; the need of

Defendants to supply electricity in response to a system-wide (state-wide or regional)

emergency that temporarily precludes compliance with an Emission Rate, a Tonnage

Limitation, or the duty to Continuously Operate a NOS, 502, or PM control device.

Depending upon the circumstances and Defendants' response to such circumstances, failure

of a permitting authority to issue a necessary permit in a timely fashion may constitute a

38

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 45 of 67
Force Majeure Event where the failure of the permitting authority to act is beyond the control

of Defendants and Defendants have taken all steps available to obtain the necessary permit,

including without limitation, submitting a complete permit application, responding to

requests for additional information by the permitting authority in a timely fashion, and

accepting lawful permit terms and conditions after expeditiously e~austing any legal rights

to appeal terms and conditions imposed by the permitting authority.

126. As part of the resolution of any matter submitted ~o this Court under

Section XVI (Dispute Resolution) regarding a claim of Force Majeure, the United States and

Defendants by agreement, or this Court by order, may in appropriate circumstances extend or

modify the schedule for completion of work under this Consent Decree to account for the

delay in the work that occurred as a result of any delay agreed to by the United States or

approved by the Court. Defendants shall be liable for stipulated penalties pursuant to Section

XIV (Stipulated Penalties) for its failure thereafter to complete the work in accordance with

the extended or modified schedule (provided that Defendants shall not be precluded from

making a further claim of Force Majeure with regard to meeting any such extended or

modified schedule).

1 1 : 1 1►

127. The dispute resolution procedure provided by this Section shall be

available to resolve all disputes arising under this Consent Decree, provided that the Party

invoking such procedure has first made a good faith attempt to resolve the matter with the

other Party. The provisions of this Section XVI shall be the.sole and. exclusive mechanism to

resolve disputes arising. under or with respect to this Consent Decree.

39

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 46 of 67
128. The dispute resolution procedure required herein shall be invoked by one

Party giving written notice to the other Party advising of a dispute pursuant to this Section.

The notice shall describe the nature of the dispute and shall state the noticing Party's position

with regard to such dispute. The. Party receiving such a notice shall acknowledge receipt of

the notice, and the Parties in dispute shall expeditiously schedule a meeting to discuss the

dispute informally not later than 14 Days following receipt of such notice.

129. Disputes submitted to dispute resolution under this Section shall, in the

first instance, be the. subject of informal negotiations between the Parties. Such period of

informal negotiations shall not extend beyond 30 Days from the date of the first meeting

between the Parties' representatives unless they agree in writing to shorten or extend this

period.

130. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement during the informal negotiation

period, the United States shall provide AIDEA and GVEA with a written summary of their

position regarding the dispute. The written position provided by the United States shall be

considered binding unless, within 45 Days thereafter, Defendants seek judicial resolution of

the dispute by filing a petition with this Court. The United States may submit a response to

the petition within 45 Days' of filing..

131. This court shall.not draw any inferences nor establish any presumptions

adverse to either Party as a result of invocation of this Section or the Parties' inability to

reach agreement.

132. The time periods set .out in this Section maybe shortened or lengthened

upon motion to the Court of one of the Parties to the dispute, explaining the Party's basis for

seeking such a scheduling modification.

40

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 47 of 67
133. T'he invocation of dispute resolution procedures shall not, by itself, extend,

postpone, or affect any obligation of Defendants under this Consent Decree, unless and until

final resolution of the dispute so provides. As part of the resolution of any dispute under this

Section, in appropriate circumstances the Parties may agree, or this Court may order, an

extension or modification of the schedule for the completion of the activities required under

this Consent Decree to account for the delay that occurred as a result of dispute resolution.

Defendants shall be liable for stipulated penalties pursuant to Section XIV (Stipulated

Penalties) for their failure thereafter to complete the work in accordance with the extended or

modified schedule.

/ 9C►ll I.~

134. Unless expressly stated otherwise in this Consent Decree, in any instance

where otherwise applicable law or this Consent Decree requires GVEA to secure a permit to

authorize construction or operation of any device, including all preconstruction, construction,

and operating permits required under State law, GVEA shall make such application in a

timely manner. EPA will use best efforts to review expeditiously, to the extent applicable, all

permit applications submitted by GVEA to meet the requirements of this Consent Decree.

135. When permits are required, GVEA shall complete and submit applications

for such permits to the applicable State agency to allow sufficient time for all legally required

processing and review of the permit request, including requests for additional information by

the applicable State agency. Any failure by GVEA to submit a timely permit application for

a GVEA Unit, as required by permitting requirements under state and/or federal regulations,

shall bar any use by GVEA of Section XV (Force Majeure) of this Consent Decree. where a

Force Majeure claim is based on permitting delays.

41

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 48 of 67
136. Notwithstanding the reference to Defendants' Title V Permit in this

Consent Decree, the enforcement of such permit shall be in accordance with its own terms

and the Act and its implementing regulations, and nothing in this Decree shall be construed

to relax any terms and conditions in the Title V Permit. Defendants' Title V Permit shall notbe enforceable under this Consent Decree, although any term or limit established by or under

this Consent Decree shall be enforceable under this Consent Decree regardless of whether

such term has or will become part of a Title V Permit; subject to the terms of Section XXVII

(Conditional Termination of Enforcement Under Consent Decree) of this Consent Decree.

137. Within 180 Days after the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree,

Defendants shall apply to modify the Title V Permit, to include a schedule for all Unitspecific and plant-specific performance, operational, maintenance, and control technology

requirements established by this Consent Decree including, but not limited to, any (a) 30-Day

Rolling Average NOX Emission Rate, (b) 30-Day Rolling Average S02 Emission Rate, (c)

Unit 1 and Unit2 Annual Tonnage Limitation, (d) 30-Day Rolling Average filterable PM

Emission Rate, (e) installation of controls; and (fl Retirement of any Unit as required or

elected under this Consent Decree.

138. Within 365 days from the Date of Entry of this Consent Decree,

Defendants shall either to permanently include the requirements and limitations

enumerated in this Consent Decree into a federally enforceable non-Title V permit or request

a site-specific revision to the Alaska SIl' to include the requirements and limitations

enumerated in this Consent Decree. The permit application or Alaska SIP revision request

shall require compliance with the following: any applicable (a) 30-Day Rolling Average NOX

Emission Rate; (b) 30-Day Rolling Average S02 Emission Rate; (c) Unit 1 and Unit 2

42

United States v. Golden valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 49 of 67
Annual Tonnage Limitations; (d) 30 Day Rolling Average filterable PM Emission Rate; {e)

installation of controls; and (fl the Retirement of any Unit as required or elected under this

Consent Decree.

139. Defendants shall provide the United States with a copy of each application .

for a federally enforceable permit or Alaska SIP revision submitted pursuant to paragraph

139, as well a copy of anypermit proposed as a result of such application, to allow for

timely participation in any public comment opportunity.

140. Prior to conditional termination of enforcement through this Consent

Decree, Defendants shall obtain enforceable provisions in its Title V permits that incorporate

all Unit-specific performance, operational, maintenance, and control technology

requirements established by this Consent Decree including, but not limited to, any (a) 30-Day

Rolling Average NOX Emission Rate; (b) 30-Day Rolling Average S02 Emission Rate; (c)

Unit 1 and Unit 2 Annual Tonnage Limitations; (d) 30-Day Rolling Average filterable PM

Emission Rate; (e) installation of controls; and (fl the election to retire or retrofit any Unit as

required or elected under this Decree.

141. If AIDEA proposes to sell or transfer to GVEA part or all of its

Operational or Ownership Interest of Unit 2, AIDEA shall comply with the requirements of

Section XX (Sales or Transfers of Operational or Ownership Interests) of this Consent

Decree with regard to that Operational or Ownership Interest prior to any such sale 

transfer.

142. If AIDEA or GVEA proposes to sell transfer to'an entity unrelated to

AIDEA and GVEA ("Third Party Purchaser") part or all of its Operational or Ownership

Interest of Units covered under this Consent Decree, AIDEA and GVEA shall comply with

43

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 50 of 67
the requirements of Section XX (Sales or Transfers of Operational or Ownership Interests) of

this Consent Decree with regard to that Operational or Ownership Interest prior to any such

sale or transfer.

XVIII. INFO MATION OL.L..CTION ND RF.T .NTION

143. Any authorized representative of the United States, including its attorneys,

contractors, and: consultants, upon presentation of credentials, shall have a right of entry to

the Healy Power Plant at any reasonable time. for the purpose of:

a. monitoring the. progress of activities required under this Consent Decree;

b. verifying any data or information submitted to the United States accordance

with the terms of this Consent Decree;

c. obtaining samples and, upon request, splits of any samples taken by AIDEA or

GVEA or .its representatives, contractors, or consultants; and

d. assessing Defendants' compliance. with this Consent Decree.

144. From the Date of Entry until five years after the termination- of this

Consent Decree, Defendants shall retain, and instruct its contractors and agents to preserve,

all non-identical copies of all records and documents (including records and documents in

electronic form) that are in its or its contractors' or agents' possession or control, and that

directly relate to Defendants' performance of their obligations under this Consent Decree.

This record retention requirement shall apply regardless of any corporate document retention

policy to the contrary. At any time during the information retention period, upon request by

the United States, Defendants shall provide copies of any documents, records or other

information required to be maintained under this Paragraph.

44

United States v. Golden TJalley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 51 of 67
145. All information and documents submitted by Defendants pursuant to this

Consent Decree shall be subject to any requests under applicable law providing public

disclosure of documents unless (a) the information and documents are subject to legal

privileges or protection or (b) Defendants claims and substantiates in accordance with 40

C.F.R. Part 2 that the information and documents contain confidential business information.

146. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall limit the authority of EPA to conduct

tests and right of entry, or right to obtain information under Section 114 ofthe Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 7414, or any other applicable federal laws, regulations, or permits, nor does it limit ar

affect any duty or obligation of the Defendants to maintain documents, records or other

information imposed by applicable federal or state laws, regulations or permits.

► ►~

147. Unless otherwise provided herein, whenever notifications, submissions, or

communications are required by this Consent Decree, they shall be made in writing and

addressed as follows:

As to the United States of America:

(if by mail service)

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section

Environment and Natural Resources Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 76.11, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-7611

DJ# 90-5-2-1-10163

(if by commercial delivery service)

Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section

Environment and Natural Resources Division

U.S. Department of Justice

ENRD Mailroom, Room 2121

601 D Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

45

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 52 of 67
DJ# 90-5-2-1-10163

and

(if by mail service)

Director, Air Enforcement Division

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code 2242A

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

(if by commercial delivery service}

Director, Air Enforcement Division

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Arie1 Rios South Building, Room 1119

1240 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

and

Manager of Air/RCRA Compliance. Unit

EPA Region 10

Air /RCRA Compliance Unit

U.S.EPA Region 1.0

'1200 Sixth Avenue Ste. 900

Seattle, WA 98101

As to GVEA:

President &CEO

Golden Valley Electric Association,Inc.

PO Box 71249

Fairbanks, AK 99707-1249

and

Vice President of Power Supply Golden Valley Electric

Association, Inc.

PO Box 71249

Fairbanks, AK 99707-1249

I~~~I~:~

Executive Director

46

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et a1.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 53 of 67
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority

813 West Northern Lights Blvd.

Anchorage, AK 99503

and.

State of Alaska Department of Law

Counsel for the Alaska Industrial Development and

Export Authority

P.O. Box 110300

Juneau, AK 99811

148. All notifications, communications, or submissions made pursuant to this

Section shall be sent either by: (a) overnight mail or overnight delivery service with

signature required for delivery, (b) certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or (c)

email. All notifications, communications, and transmissions (a) sent by overnight, certified,

or registered mail shall be deemed submitted the date they are postmarked, (b) sent by

overnight delivery service shall be deemed submitted on the date they are delivered to the

delivery service or (c) sent by email shall be deemed submitted on the date they are

electronically transmitted. Defendants may provide the notifications, communications, or

submissions made pursuant to this Section electronically or in hard copy.

149. Any Party may change either the notice recipient or the address for

providing notices to it by serving the other Parties with a notice setting forth such new notice

recipient or address.

150. Prior to any transfer of an ownership or operational interest in Unit 2,

Defendants shall remain jointly and severally liable to the United States for the obligations of

this Consent Decree unless such obligation is the sole responsibility of GVEA under this

47

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 54 of 67
Consent Decree for Unit l . The United States and the Defendants recognize that AIDEA and

GVEA have been in negotiations to transfer ownership of Unit 2 from AIDEA to GVEA.

The transfer has not yet occurred. Without further approval of the Court or the United States,

AIDEA's obligations and its Party status under this Consent Decree shall immediately

terminate upon the sale or transfer of Unit 2 from AIDEA to GVEA, provided that AIDEA

and GVEA file a notice with the Court certifying that (1) the transfer has occurred, (2) any

accrued stipulated penalties are paid in full, and (3) GVEA shall remain liable to the United

States for the obligations of this Consent Decree applicable to the transferred or purchased

Operational or Ownership Interest. So long as the requirements of this Consent Decree are

met, this Consent Decree shall not be construed to impede the. transfer of any Operational or

Ownership .Interests between GVEA and any Third Party Purchaser. This Consent Decree

shall not be construed to prohibit a contractual allocation of the burdens of compliance with

this Consent Decree as between AIDEA and GVEA Operational or Ownership Interests.

151. If AIDEA or GVEA proposes to sell or transfer an Operational or

Ownership Interest in the Healy Power Plant to another' entity (a Third. Party Purchaser) _

AIDEA or GVEA shall advise the Third Party Purchaser in writing of the existence of this

Consent Decree prior to such sale or transfer, and shall send a copy of such written

notification to the United States pursuant to Section XIX (Notices) of this Consent Decree at

least 60 Days before such proposed sale or transfer. _

152. No sale or transfer of an Operational or Ownership Interest shall take

place before the Third Party Purchaser and the United States have executed, and the Court

has approved, a modification pursuant to Section XXIII (Modification) of this Consent

Decree making the Third Party Purchaser a party to this Consent Decree and jointly and

48

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 55 of 67
severally liable with AIDEA and GVEA for all the requirements of this Consent Decree that

maybe applicable to the transferred or purchased Operational or Ownership Interests.

153. This Consent Decree shall not be construed to impede the transfer of any

Operational or Ownership Interests between AIDEA or GVEA and any Third Party

Purchaser so long as the requirements of this Consent Decree are met. This Consent Decree

shall not be construed to prohibit a contractual allocation of the burdens of compliance with

this Consent Decree as between GVEA and/or AIDEA and any Third Party Purchaser of

Operational or Ownership Interests, provided that both AIDEA and/or GVEA and/or such

Third Party Purchaser, to the extent they retain any operational or ownership interests, shall

remain jointly and severally liable to the United States for the obligations of this Consent

Decree applicable to the transferred or purchased Operational or Ownership Interests.

154. If the United States agrees, the United States, the Defendants,. and the

Third Party Purchaser that has become a party to this Consent Decree pursuant to Paragraph

153 may execute a modification that relieves AIDEA or GVEA of its liability under this

Consent Decree for, and makes the Third Party Purchaser liable for, all obligations and

liabilities applicable to the purchased transferred Operational or Ownership Interests.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, AIDEA and GVEA may not assign, and may not be

released from, any obligation under this Consent Decree that is not specific to the purchased

or transferred Operational or Ownership Interests, including the obligations set forth in

Sections IX (Environmental Mitigation Project) and N (Civil Penalty). AIDEA and GVEA

may propose and the United States may agree to restrict the scope of the joint and several

liability of any purchaser or transferee for any obligations of this Consent Decree that are not

49

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 56 of 67
specific to the transferred or purchased Operational or Ownership Interests, to the extent such

obligations maybe adequately separated in an enforceable manner.

155. Paragraphs 152 through 155 of this Consent Decree do not apply if an

Ownership Interest is transferred solely as collateral security. in order to consummate a

financing arrangement (not including asale-leaseback), so long as AIDEA and GVEA: (a)

remain the operator (as that term is used and interpreted under the Act) of the subject Unit(s);

(b) remain subject to and liable for all obligations and liabilities of this Consent. Decree; and

(c) supply the United States with the following certification within 30 Days after the transfer:

"Certification. of Change in Ownership Interest Solely for Purpose of Consummating

Financing. We, the Chief Executive Officer and General Counsel of [insert name of

Owner], hereby jointly certify under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1001, on our own behalf and

on behalf of [insert name of Owner], that any change in [insert name of Owner]'s

Ownership Interest in any Unit that is caused by the sale or transfer as collateral security

of such Ownership Interest in such Units) pursuant to the financing agreement

consummated on [insert applicable date] between [insert name of Owner] and [insert

applicable entity]: a) is made solely for the purpose of providing collateral security in

order to consummate a financing arrangement; b) does not impair [insert name of

Owner]'s ability, legally or otherwise, to comply timely with all terms and provisions of

the Consent Decree entered in United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association et al.,

Civil Action ; c) does not affect [insert name of Owner]'s operational control of

any Unit covered by that Consent Decree in a manner that is inconsistent with [insert

name of Owner]'s performance of its obligations under the Consent Decree; and d) in no

way affects the status of [insert name of Owner]'s obligations or liabilities under that

Consent Decree."

156. The effective date of this Consent Decree shall be the Date of Entry.

~ 1~ 1 11: _ 1 1~

157. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this case after entry of this Consent

Decree to enforce compliance with the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and to

take any action necessary or appropriate for the interpretation, construction, execution, or

50

United States v. Golden Ijalley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 57 of 67
modification of the Consent Decree, or for. adjudication of disputes. During the term of this

Consent Decree, any Party to this Consent Decree may apply to the Court for any relief

necessary to construe or effectuate this Consent Decree.

XIII. MODIFICATION

158. The terms of this Consent Decree may be modified only by a subsequent

written agreement signed by United States and Defendants. Where the modification

constitutes a material change any term of this Consent Decree, it shall be effective only

upon approval by the Court.

XXIV. G . Ai. PROVISIONS

159. When this Consent Decree specifies that Defendants shall achieve and

maintain a 30-Day Rolling Average Emission. Rate, the Parties expressly recognize that

compliance with: such 30-Day Rolling Average Emission Rate shall commence immediately

upon the date specified and that compliance as of such specified date (ems., December 30)

shall be determined based on data from that date and the 29 prior Unit Operating Days.

160. This Consent Decree is not a permit. Compliance with the terms of this

Consent Decree does not guarantee compliance with all applicable federal, state, or local

laws or regulations. The emission rates and removal efficiencies set forth herein do not

relieve Defendants from any obligation to comply with other state and federal requirements

under the Act.

161. This Consent Decree does not apply to any claims) of alleged criminal

liability.

162. In any subsequent administrative or judicial action initiated by the United

States for injunctive relief or civil penalties relating to Unit 1 or Unit 2 as covered by this

s1

United States v. Golden Yalley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 58 of 67
Consent Decree, neither AIDEA nor GVEA shall assert any defense or claim based upon

principles of waiver, res 'ud,~ icata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim preclusion, or

claim splitting, or any other defense based upon the contention that the claims raised by the

United States in the subsequent proceeding were brought; or should have been brought, in the

instant case; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph is intended to affect the

validity of Section XI (Resolution of Civil Claims).

163. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall relieve Defendants of their obligation

to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations; including, but not

limited to,the Clean Water Act and the. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

(NPDES) implementing regulations, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the National

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From Coal and Oil- Fired Electric Utility

Steam Generating Units (Utility MACT or MATS), the Standards of Performance for FossilFuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial

Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Utility NSPS), and

BART requirements set forth in the Alaska SIP. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be

construed to provide any relief from the emission limits or deadlines for the installation of

pollution controls specified in these regulations.

164. Subject to the provisions in Section XI (Resolution of Civil Claims), XIV

(Stipulated Penalties), and in Section XVI (Dispute Resolution), nothing contained in this

Consent Decree shall be construed to prevent or limit the rights of the United States to obtain

penalties or injunctive relief under the Act or other federal, state, or local statutes,

regulations, or permits.

52

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 59 of 67
165. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be interpreted or construed to relieve

Defendants of their obligations under the Memorandum of Agreement that it signed in 1993

with the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, concerning the Healy Clean

Coal Project, Healy Alaska.

166. Each limit and/or other requirement established by or under this Consent

Decree is a separate, independent requirement.

167. Performance standards, emissions limits, and other quantitative standards

set by or under this Consent Decree must be met to the number of significant digits in which

the standard or limit is expressed. For example, an Emission Rate of 0.100 not met if the

actual Emission Rate is 0.101. Defendants shall round the fourth significant digit to the

nearest third significant digit, or the third significant digit to the nearest second significant

digit, depending upon whether the limit is expressed to three or two significant digits. For

example, if an actual Emission Rate is 0.1004, that shall be reported as 0.100, and shall be in

compliance with an Emission Rate of 0.100, and if an actual Emission Rate is 0.1005, that

shall be reported as 0.101, and shall not be in compliance with an Emission Rate of 0.100.

Defendants shall report data. to the number of significant digits which the standard or limit

is expressed.

168. This Consent Decree does not limit, enlarge, or affect the rights of any.

Party to this Consent Decree as against any third parties.

169. This Consent Decree constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive

agreement and understanding between the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied in

this Consent Decree, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the

Parties related to the subject matter herein. No document, representation, inducement,

53

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 60 of 67
agreement, understanding, or promise constitutes any part of this Consent Decree or the

settlement it represents, nor shall they be used in construing the terms of this Consent

Decree.

170. Except as provided below, each Party to this action .shall bear its own costs

and attorneys' fees.

-- ~:__1_._.- =-~l1 - -~~

171. Each undersigned representative of AIDEA, GVEA and the Assistant

Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the United States

Department of Justice, certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and

conditions of this Consent Decree and to execute. and legally bind to this document the.Party

he or she represents.

172. This ConsentDecree may be signed in counterparts, and such counterpart

signature pages shall be given full force and effect.

173. Each Party hereby agrees to accept service of process by mail with respect

to all matters arising under or relating to this Consent Decree and to waive the formal service

requirements set forth in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable

Local Rules of this Court including, but not limited to, service of a summons.

174. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the United States agrees that

Defendants will not be required to file. any answer or other pleading responsive to the United

States' concurrently filed Complaint in this matter until and unless the Court expressly

declines to enter this Consent Decree, in which case Defendants shall have no less than 45

Days after. receiving notice of such express declination. to file an answer or other pleading in

response to the Complaint.

54

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 61 of 67
Ji 11/1\/1 \ \ ~ /I ~

175. This Consent Decree shall be lodged with the Court for a period of not less

than 30 Days for public notice and comment in accordance with 28 C.F.R. ' 50.7. The

United States reserves the right to withdraw or withhold its consent if the comments regarding

the Consent Decree disclose facts or considerations indicating that the Consent Decree is

inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.. Defendants consent to entry of this Consent Decree

without further notice and agree not to withdraw from or oppose entfy of this Consent Decree

by the Court or to challenge any provision of this Consent Decree, unless the United States

has notified Defendants in writing that it no longer supports entry of this Consent Decree.

1 ~I o 1 ~ : : u I I~ : ~ ► 1 ~ 1 : ~1 / ►~7 1 ~I~Y~i1~11] ~I:ZK1)►~y ~I~Y

---

176. Conditional Termination of Enforcement Through this Consent Decree.

Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 178, after Defendants:

a. have successfully completed construction, and have maintained operation, of all.

pollution controls as required by this Consent Decree for a period of two years

and have successfully competed all actions necessary to Retire any Unit required

or elected to be Retired as required by this Consent Decree; and

b. have obtained all the final permits and/or site-specific Alaska SIl' revisions (i) as

required by Section XVII (Permits) of this Consent Decree and (ii) that include as

federally enforceable permit terms or Alaska SIP provisions all Unit-specific

performance, operational, maintenance, and control technology requirements

established by this Consent Decree;

55

United States v. Golden Palley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 62 of 67
then Defendants may so certify these facts to the United States and this Court. If the United

States do not object in writing with specific reasons within 45 Days of receipt of Defendants'

certification, then, for any violations of this Consent Decree that occur after the filing of notice,

the United States shall pursue enforcement of these requirements through the applicable permits

andlor other enforcement authorities and not through this Consent Decree.

177. Resort to Enforcement Under this Consent Decree. Notwithstanding

Paragraph 177, if enforcement of aprovision this Consent Decree cannot be pursued by

the United States under the Alaska SIP or applicable permits) issued pursuant to the Act or

its implementing regulations ("CAA Permit"), or if a Consent Decree requirement was

intended to be of the Alaska SIl' or CAA Permit but did not become or remain part of

such SIP or permit, then such requirement may be enforced under the terms of this Consent

Decree at any time.

XXVIII. FIN i. Ti t .NT

178. Upon approval and entry of this Consent Decree by the Court, this

Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment between the United States, AIDEA and

GVEA.

SO ORDERED, THIS DAY OF 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

56

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al.,

Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 63 of 67
Signature Page for United States of America v. Golden Valley Electric Assoc. et al. Consent

Decree -

FOR THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Respectfully submitted, ~,

-,

,<

,~

L MAHAN

Deputy Section Chief

Environmental Enforcement Section

Environment and Natural Resources

Division

United States Department of Justice

JUSTIN AGE

Senior Counsel

Environmental Enforcement Section

Environment and Natural Resources

Division

P.O.. Box 761.1

Washington, DC .20044-7611

(202) 514-5293

s~

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 64 of 67
Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 65 of 67
Signature Page for United States ofAmerica v. Golden Palley Electric Assoc. et al. Consent

Decree

FOR GOLDEN VALLEY ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC.

By:

Bor n

Interim President &CEO

Golden Valley Electric Association, Inc.

59

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al., Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 66 of 67
Signature Page for United States ofAmerzca v. Golden Valley Electric Assoc. et al. Consent

Decree

FOR ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY

By: 6~-~~ `.-`'

Ted Leonard

Executive Director

Alaska Industrial Development and

Export Authority

60

United States v. Golden Valley Electric Association, et al., Consent Decree

Case 4:12-cv-00025-RRB Document 3 Filed 10/02/12 Page 67 of 67