alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,183
<SECURITIES>                                       449
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,290
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,292
<PP&E>                                          50,920
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 328,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,105
<BONDS>                                         30,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,904
<OTHER-SE>                                     237,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   328,558
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,320
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (34)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,533
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
<FN>
<F1>Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position or Results of Operations are reported as 0 herein.
</FN>



</TABLE>
§ 8.13 Preemployment inquiries. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a recipient may not make a preemployment inquiry or conduct a preemployment medical examination of an applicant to determine whether the applicant is an individual with handicaps or the nature or severity of a handicap. A recipient may, however, make preemployment inquiry into an applicant's ability to perform job-related functions.
( b ) When a recipient is undertaking affirmative action efforts, voluntary or otherwise, the recipient may invite applicants for employment to indicate whether and to what extent they are handicapped, if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The recipient states clearly on any written questionnaire used for this purpose, or makes clear orally if no written questionnaire is used, that the information requested is intended for use solely in connection with its remedial action obligations, or its voluntary or affirmative action efforts; and
( 2 ) The recipient states clearly that the information is being requested on a voluntary basis, that it will be kept confidential (as provided in paragraph (d) of this section), that refusal to provide the information will not subject the applicant or employee to any adverse treatment, and that the information will be used only in accordance with this part.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall prohibit a recipient from conditioning an offer of employment on the results of a medical examination conducted before the employee's entrance on duty if all entering employees in that category of job classification must take such an examination regardless of handicap, and the results of such examination are used only in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( d ) Information obtained under this section concerning the medical condition or history of the applicant is to be collected and maintained on separate forms that are accorded confidentiality as medical records, except that: ( 1 ) Supervisors and managers may be informed of restrictions on the work or duties of individuals with handicaps and informed of necessary accommodations;
( 2 ) First aid and safety personnel may be informed if the condition might require emergency treatment; and
( 3 ) Government officials investigating compliance with section 504 shall be provided relevant information upon request.
### §645. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §4007(b), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 108

Section, Pub. L. 91–518, title VIII, §806, as added Pub. L. 92–316, §12, June 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 233, provided for a report by Secretary of Transportation to Congress evaluating intercity rail passenger service operations.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3018 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3018

 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to eliminate 
                       the application deadlines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2005

Ms. Moore of Wisconsin (for herself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Kind, Mr. Holden, 
    Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Sabo, Mr. Honda, and Mr. McDermott) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to eliminate 
                       the application deadlines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bruce Vento Hmong Veterans' 
Naturalization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF APPLICATION DEADLINES.

    Section 6 of the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 (8 
U.S.C. 1423 note) (as amended by section 112 of Public Law 107-77 (115 
Stat. 765)) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 6. NO DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION; PAYMENT OF FEES.

    ``This Act shall apply to a person only if the person files an 
application for naturalization, as provided in section 334 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1445), and pays the 
appropriate fees.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §59. Official papers in office of surveyor general in California; copies

All official books, papers, instruments of writing, documents, archives, official seals, stamps, or dies, which have been authorized by law to be collected and deposited in the surveyor general's office in California, shall be safely and securely kept by the Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate, in the archives of his office until disposed of as provided by law; and copies thereof, authenticated by the Secretary or such officer under his seal of office, shall be evidence in all cases where the originals would be evidence.

(R.S. §2229; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1144; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100; Oct. 25, 1951, ch. 562, §3(3), 65 Stat. 639.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2229 derived from act May 18, 1858, ch. 39, §1, 11 Stat. 289.

#### Amendments

1951—Act Oct. 25, 1951, inserted "until disposed of as provided by law".

#### **Statutory Notes and Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate" substituted for "Supervisor of Surveys" on authority on section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.

Previously, "Supervisor of Surveys" was substituted for "surveyor general" by act Mar. 3, 1925.
#### § 402.3 Contract provisions.

The renewal HAP contract shall be construed and administered in accordance with all statutory requirements, and with all HUD regulations and other requirements, including changes in HUD regulations and other requirements during the term of the renewal HAP contract, unless the contract provides otherwise.

[71 FR 2121, Jan. 12, 2006]
#### § 880.610 Adjustment of utility allowances.

In connection with annual and special adjustments of contract rents, the owner must submit an analysis of the project's Utility Allowances. Such data as changes in utility rates and other facts affecting utility consumption should be provided as part of this analysis to permit appropriate adjustments in the Utility Allowances. In addition, when approval of a utility rate change would result in a cumulative increase of 10 percent or more in the most recently approved Utility Allowances, the project owner must advise the contract administrator and request approval of new Utility Allowances. Whenever a Utility Allowance for a unit is adjusted, the owner will promptly notify affected families and make a corresponding adjustment of the tenant rent and the amount of the housing assistance payment for the unit.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0161)

[50 FR 39097, Sept. 27, 1985]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 324 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, Florida, as the ``Arthur 
                Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 321 Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, Florida, as the ``Arthur 
                Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 321 
Montgomery Road in Altamonte Springs, Florida, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Arthur Stacey Mastrapa Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 15, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §1903. Distribution of publications to depositories; notice to Government components; cost of printing and binding

Upon request of the Superintendent of Documents, components of the Government ordering the printing of publications shall either increase or decrease the number of copies of publications furnished for distribution to designated depository libraries and State libraries so that the number of copies delivered to the Superintendent of Documents is equal to the number of libraries on the list. The number thus delivered may not be restricted by any statutory limitation in force on August 9, 1962. Copies of publications furnished the Superintendent of Documents for distribution to designated depository libraries shall include—

the journals of the Senate and House of Representatives;

all publications, not confidential in character, printed upon the requisition of a congressional committee;

Senate and House public bills and resolutions; and

reports on private bills, concurrent or simple resolutions;

but not so-called cooperative publications which must necessarily be sold in order to be self-sustaining.

The Superintendent of Documents shall currently inform the components of the Government ordering printing of publications as to the number of copies of their publications required for distribution to depository libraries. The cost of printing and binding those publications distributed to depository libraries obtained elsewhere than from the Government Publishing Office, shall be borne by components of the Government responsible for their issuance; those requisitioned from the Government Publishing Office shall be charged to appropriations provided the Superintendent of Documents for that purpose.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1283; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §85 (part) (Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2284, §4, 34 Stat. 1014; June 25, 1938, ch. 708, 52 Stat. 1206; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–579, §5, 76 Stat. 354).

The last paragraph of former section 85 will be found in section 1906 of the revision.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in second par. on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.
#### Psychoanalytic Center, Inc., Respondent, v Robert A. Burns, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 29, 1977, which confirmed an arbitration award in favor of petitioner-respondent (Psychoanalytic Center, Inc.), unanimously reversed, on the law, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant, and the motion for confirmation is denied and the award vacated. In this dispute an award was rendered in favor of respondent for fees collected by appellant, a licensed psychologist, from patients referred to him by respondent. The effect of the award was to validate "splitting of fees”, conduct which is prohibited by law (Education Law, § 6509, subd [9]; Commissioner of Education Regulation, former 8 NYCRR 72.2 [a] [4]). Although a mistake by an arbitrator in regard to the law or facts is not a ground for vacatur, that rule is inapplicable when the ruling contravenes established public policy. *(Garrity v Lyle Stuart, Inc.,*40 NY2d 354, 356-357; see, also, *Matter of Western*
      *964
      *Union Tel. Co. [Amer. Communications Assn.],*299 NY 177, 185-187, and *Matter of Associated Teachers of Huntington v Board of Educ.,*33 NY2d 229, 235-236; cf. *Binghamton Civ. Serv. Forum v City of Binghamton,*44 NY2d 23.) The prohibition on fee splitting is founded on the policy of encouraging professional responsibility and ensuring undivided attention to patients. (See *Matter of Associated Gen. Contrs., N. Y. State Ch. [Savin Bros.],*36 NY2d 957, 958.) Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Lane and Sandler, JJ.
Assignment and Assumption of Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Property



  
 Exhibit 10.4 

THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE (this “Assignment”) is entered
into as of the 4th day of October, 2010, by and between WELLS CORE OFFICE INCOME OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Assignor”) and WELLS CORE REIT – ROYAL RIDGE V, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (“Assignee”). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, Assignor, as “Buyer”, has entered into that certain Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as of
August 5, 2010, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as of September 7, 2010, that certain Second Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as of September 14, 2010, that certain
Third Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as of September 21, 2010, that certain Fourth Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated as of September 28, 2010 and that certain Fifth Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and
Sale dated as of October 1, 2010 (as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”) with BREOF BNK3A ROYAL RIDGE LP, a Delaware limited liability company, with respect to the purchase and sale of certain real property located in the City
of Irving, County of Dallas and State of Texas as more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement. 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.8 of the Purchase Agreement, Assignor wishes to assign, and Assignee wishes
to accept assignment of, and to assume, all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under the Purchase Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of Ten and 00/100 ($10.00) Dollars, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Assignor hereby
assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Purchase Agreement and Assignee accepts the foregoing assignment and assumes the obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement. 

-Signature Page Follows- 







  
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have each caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Assignment, on behalf of, and as the act of, Assignor and Assignee, respectively, for the purposes set out herein. 

 

									
		 		 	 ASSIGNOR:

			
		 		 	 WELLS CORE OFFICE INCOME OPERATING

PARTNERSHIP, L.P., a Delaware limited
 partnership

				
		 		 	 By:
	 	 Wells Core Office Income REIT, Inc., a

Maryland corporation, its general partner

				
		 		 		 	 By: /s/ Douglas P. Williams

		 		 		 	 Name: Douglas P. Williams

		 		 		 	 Title: Executive Vice President

			
		 		 	 ASSIGNEE:

			
		 		 	 WELLS CORE REIT – ROYAL RIDGE V, LLC, a

Delaware limited liability company

				
		 		 	 By:
	 	 Wells Core Office Income Operating

Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited
 partnership, its sole member

					
		 		 		 	 By:
	 	 Wells Core Office Income REIT,
 Inc., a Maryland corporation, its
 general partner

					
		 		 		 		 	 By: /s/ Douglas P. Williams

		 		 		 		 	 Name: Douglas P. Williams

		 		 		 		 	 Title: Executive Vice President
Case 3:09-cv-01018-MHP Document 32 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01018-MHP Document 32 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01018-MHP Document 32 Filed 04/13/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01018-MHP Document 32 Filed 04/13/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01018-MHP Document 32 Filed 04/13/10 Page 5 of 6
4/12/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-01018-MHP Document 32 Filed 04/13/10 Page 6 of 6
#### § 50.43 Emergencies.

In cases of national emergency and disasters or cases of imminent threat to health and safety or other emergency which require the taking of an action with significant environmental impact, the provisions of 40 CFR 1506.11 and of any applicable § 50.4 authorities which provide for emergencies shall apply.
|  |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |  |
|  |  |                                                                                                                                        |
|  |  | /s/ James Darrell Thomas                                                                                                       |  |
|  |  | James Darrell Thomas                                                                                                                   |  |
|  |  | Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2020-A |  |
|  |  |                                                                                                                                        |  |
### Database for the Geologic Map of the Skykomish River 30-Minute by 60-Minute Quadrangle, Washington (I-1963)

By: R. W. TaborV. A. Frizzell Jr.D. B. BoothR. B. WaittJ. T. WhettenR. E. Zartman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds222

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Metadata:  **Metadata**                            (txt)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
#### Saul Ballardo CASTRO, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71972.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 16, 2007.

Saul Ballardo Castro, Victorville, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stephen J. Flynn Fax, Jennifer L. Lightbody, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Saul Ballardo Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Ballardo Castro fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s determination that he failed to establish ten years of continuous physical presence. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

The BIA properly determined that even if Ballardo Castro is the beneficiary of an approved 1-130 visa petition, an approved visa petition does not give him lawful immigration status or automatically entitle him to relief. *See Ngongo v. Ashcroft,*397 F.3d 821, 823 (9th Cir.2005).

Ballardo Castro’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### **CHAPTER 309—SUITS IN ADMIRALTY AGAINST THE UNITED STATES**

Sec.
30901.
Short title.
30902.
Definition.
30903.
Waiver of immunity.
30904.
Exclusive remedy.
30905.
Period for bringing action.
30906.
Venue.
30907.
Procedure for hearing and determination.
30908.
Exemption from arrest or seizure.
30909.
Security.
30910.
Exoneration and limitation.
30911.
Costs and interest.
30912.
Arbitration, compromise, or settlement.
30913.
Payment of judgment or settlement.
30914.
Release of privately owned vessel after arrest or attachment.
30915.
Seizures and other proceedings in foreign jurisdictions.
30916.
Recovery by the United States for salvage services.
30917.
Disposition of amounts recovered by the United States.
30918.
Reports.