alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3210 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3210

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-Amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-
                               triazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-Amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-
                               triazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-5-MERCAPTO-1,2,4-TRIAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-Amino-5-mercapto-1,2,4-
triazole) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Nat Koslow, Inc., Respondent, v. Jack N. Rubin, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and MeNally, JJ.
§ 55.4 Notification of floodplain hazard. ( a ) *Notification for property owners, buyers, and developers.* For actions in the FFRMS floodplain (as defined in § 55.7), HUD (or HUD's designee) or the responsible entity must ensure that any party participating in the transaction is notified that the property is in the FFRMS floodplain and whether flood insurance is required or available in this location. Notification shall also include a description of the approximate elevation of the FFRMS floodplain, proximity to flood-related infrastructure impacting the site including dams and levees, the location of ingress and egress or evacuation routes relative to the FFRMS floodplain, disclosure of information on flood insurance claims filed on the property to the extent available from FEMA, and other relevant information such as available emergency notification resources.
( b ) *Renter notification.* For HUD-assisted, HUD-acquired, and HUD-insured rental properties within the FFRMS floodplain, new and renewal leases must include acknowledgements signed by residents indicating that they have been advised that the property is in a floodplain and flood insurance is available for their personal property. Notification shall also include the location of ingress and egress routes relative to the FFRMS floodplain, available emergency notification resources, and the property's emergency procedures for residents in the event of flooding.
( c ) *Conveyance restrictions for the disposition of multifamily real property.* ( 1 ) In the disposition (including leasing) of multifamily properties acquired by HUD that are located in the FFRMS floodplain, the documents used for the conveyance must: ( i ) Refer to those uses that are restricted under identified Federal, State, or local floodplain regulations; and
( ii ) Include any land use restrictions limiting the use of the property by a grantee or purchaser and any successors under State or local laws.
( 2 ) ( i ) For disposition of multifamily properties acquired by HUD that are located in the FFRMS floodplain and contain critical actions, HUD shall, as a condition of approval of the disposition, require by covenant or comparable restriction on the property's use that the property owner and successive owners provide written notification to each current and prospective tenant concerning: ( A ) The hazards to life and to property for those persons who reside or work in a structure located within the FFRMS floodplain, and
( B ) The availability of flood insurance on the contents of their dwelling unit or business.
( ii ) The notice described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section shall also be posted in the building so that it will be legible at all times and easily visible to all persons entering or using the building.
[89 FR 30905, Apr. 23, 2024]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANNA PRESTON, aka DONNA

MAE PRESTON,

Petitioner, 

 v.

MARY LATTIMER, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 09-2262 WHA (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

OF TIME; DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Docket Nos. 12, 15, 16)

Good cause appearing, respondent’s motion for an extension of time, to and including

May 14, 2010, in which to file an answer (docket number 16) is GRANTED. If petitioner wishes

to file a traverse, she shall do so within thirty days of the date the answer is filed. 

Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (docket number 12) is DENIED. 

Petitioner has presented his claims adequately in the petition, and they are not particularly

complex. The interests of justice do not require appointment of counsel at this stage of the case.

As petitioner has paid the filing fee, her application to proceed in forma pauperis (docket

number 15) is DENIED as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 13 , 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\PRO-SE\WHA\HC.09\PRESTON2262.EXT-P.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-02262-WHA Document 17 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Celia Bass, Respondent, v Phyllis Wexler et al., Appellants.

[715 NYS2d 873]

—In an action to recover damages for *267personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated October 18, 1999, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court, entered January 19, 1999, upon their failure to appear.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants seeking to recover damages for personal injuries. After the defendants failed to timely answer or appear, a judgment was entered against them. The defendants thereafter moved to vacate the judgment, arguing, *inter alia,*that they had both a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense to the action *(see,*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). They further argued that the plaintiffs motion to be granted a judgment upon their default was not supported by an affidavit of the facts or a complaint verified by a party with personal knowledge of the facts, as required by CPLR 3215 (f) *(see, Grainger v Wright,*274 AD2d 549; *Henriquez v Purins,*245 AD2d 337). In the order appealed from, the Supreme Court denied the motion to vacate. We affirm.

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, they failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their default. Thus, the court properly denied their motion to vacate pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) *(see, Booth v Hawk Contrs.,*259 AD2d 577). Further, on the facts presented, particularly the advanced age of the plaintiff, the denial of the motion was a provident exercise of-the court’s discretion to consider such relief in the interest of justice *(see, F & C Gen. Contrs. Corp. v Atlantic Mut. Mtge. Corp.,*202 AD2d 629; *Lane v Lane,*175 AD2d 103). To the extent that our decisions in *Hazim v Winter*(234 AD2d 422) and *Goodyear v Weinstein*(224 AD2d 387) described each of the default judgments therein as a “nullity” and subject to vacatur as such, they should not be followed *(see, Freccia v Carullo,*93 AD2d 281).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., H. Miller, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Avis Reisinger et al., Appellants, v Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to compel respondents to (1) accord petitioners their proper seniority credits for purposes of layoffs and (2) reinstate them if teachers with less seniority have been retained, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 2, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioners were part-time teachers at their own request. It cannot be said that the failure to grant them credit, for seniority purposes, for such part-time service was illegal, arbitrary or capricious. In view of our determination, we do not reach the question of the applicability of subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law to the fact pattern here. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

30023

06-DEC-2013

10:02 AM
§ 882.101 Applicability. ( a ) The provisions of this part apply to the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program.
( b ) This part states the policies and procedures to be used by a PHA in administering a Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program. The purpose of this program is to upgrade substandard rental housing and to provide rental subsidies for low-income families.
( c ) Subpart H of this part only applies to the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room Occupancy Program for Homeless Individuals.
[63 FR 23853, Apr. 30, 1998]
#### Gertrude Chew, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. Delores H. Duffy, Appellant.

Motion granted and order dismissing appeal vacated, on condition demand pursuant to rule YII of the Appellate Division Fourth Department Rules is filed on or before January 16, 1961.
#### In re GRADE CROSSING COM’RS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

In the matter of the application of the grade crossing commissioners for the appointment of commissioners, etc. Proceeding No. 58, as to land claimed to be owned by Margaret Farrow and others.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

HISCOCK, J., not voting.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 31 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 31

To direct the Administrator of General Services to take such action as 
   may be necessary to have the Federal Trade Commission vacate the 
  building located at 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in the District of 
   Columbia and to make that building available for occupancy by the 
                        National Gallery of Art.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

   Mr. Mica introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Administrator of General Services to take such action as 
   may be necessary to have the Federal Trade Commission vacate the 
  building located at 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in the District of 
   Columbia and to make that building available for occupancy by the 
                        National Gallery of Art.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART.

    (a) Location.--Not later than December 31, 2012, the Administrator 
of General Services shall take such action as may be necessary to--
            (1) have the Federal Trade Commission vacate the building 
        located at 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, in the District of 
        Columbia;
            (2) make that building available for occupancy by the 
        National Gallery of Art; and
            (3) relocate the Federal Trade Commission into another 
        appropriate building in a location selected in consultation 
        with the Commission.
    (b) Reconstruction.--The Administrator shall reconstruct the 
building referred to in subsection (a)(1) to house and exhibit works of 
art and carry administrative functions, subject to the requirements of 
the Director of the National Gallery of Art.
    (c) Designation.--Beginning on the date that the National Gallery 
of Art takes occupancy of the building referred to in subsection 
(a)(1)--
            (1) the building shall be known and designated as the 
        ``National Gallery of Art''; and
            (2) any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
        paper, or other record of the United States to the building 
        shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National Gallery of 
        Art''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

MAXWELL DAVID EDGIN,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 264 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
SERVED: APRlL 2, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

JOHN CROFT 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS FAA-2012-0903 

ZDJJ 

ORDER GRANTING COMPLAINANT'S MOTIONS 

AND LIMITING HEARING TO PENALTY 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") on February 19, 2013 had 

filed Motions asking that the allegations of its Complaint be deemed admitted and sought a 

decision in its favor as a matter of law because Respondent John Croft ("Respondent" or "Mr. 

Croft") had not answered the Complaint. Respondent had neither demonstrated good cause for 

failure to file an answer nor had sought an extension oftime in which to do so. The agency's 

Rules of Practice state that a person's failure to file an Answer without good cause shall be 

deemed an admission ofthe truth of each allegation of the Complaint. 14 C.P.R. §l3.209(f). The 

Motions also requested that the hearing in this matter be limited to the issue of the appropriate 

civil penalty. 

Our Order to Show Cause of March 8, 2013 (''OSC"), issued in response to 

Complainant's Motions, directed Mr. Croft to answer the OSC and to answer the Complaint by 

March 22, 2013 or risk the sanctions detailed therein. 
2 

Mr. Croft has failed to answer the Order to Show Cause. 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Motions to Deem Admitted Each Allegation in the Complaint, and 

for a Decision as to the Violations, are GRANTED; 

2. Respondent John Croft is found in violation of 49 C.F.R. §§ 172.2(e), 172.200(a), 

172.202(a)(l), 172.202(a)(2), 172.202(a)(3), l72.202(a)(4), 172.202(a)(5), 

172.203(f), 172.204(a), 172.204(c)(2), 172.204(c)(3), 172.300/172.30l(a), 

172.604(a), and 173.27(b)(l); and 

3. The hearing in FDMS F AA-2012-0903 will be limited to the issue of the 

appropriate civil penalty to be assessed. 

~ c/GJL:__fi& iCiliU:(lC:O:(wdwin 

Attachment - Service List 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
, m 

3 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

John Croft, Respondent 

134 Lincoln Street 

Sitka, AK 99835 

TEL: 907-738-1256 

ONE COPY 

Howard L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7th A venue , Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5273 

FAX: 907- 271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Staff Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0903 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

·

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A143
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3085 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2006 

Received 

AUGUST 4 (legislative day, AUGUST 3), 2006 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to update the 

feasibility and suitability study originally prepared for 

the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail and provide 

for the inclusion of new trail segments, land components, 

and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

HR 3085 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEASIBILITY AND SUITABILITY 

2 STUDY OF TRAIL OF TEARS NATIONAL HIS3 TORIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(16) of the National Trails System Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(16)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘sub7 sections’’ and inserting ‘‘sections’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) Not later than 6 months after the date of the 

11 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 

12 complete the remaining criteria and submit to Congress 

13 a study regarding the feasibility and suitability of desig14 nating, as additional components of the Trail of Tears Na15 tional Historic Trail, the following routes and land compo16 nents by which the Cherokee Nation was removed to Okla17 homa: 

18 ‘‘(i) The Benge and Bell routes. 

19 ‘‘(ii) The land components of the designated 

20 water routes in Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and 

21 Tennessee. 

22 ‘‘(iii) The routes from the collection forts in 

23 Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee to 

24 the emigration depots. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

HR 3085 RFS 

1 ‘‘(iv) The related campgrounds located along 

2 the routes and land components described in clauses 

3 (i) through (iii).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2006. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONOF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, M. Ethan Berman,certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1(the “Report”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,2009 of RiskMetrics Group, Inc.; and

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, the Report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by the Report.

 

Date: April 30, 2010

 

 
| /s/ M. ETHAN BERMAN    |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| M. Ethan Berman                  |   |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)* |   |

 

----
#### § 882.809 Waivers.

Section 5.405(b) of this title does not apply to this program.
#### § 891.755 Obligations of the family.

The obligations of the family are provided in § 891.415.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32782]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  11 a.m., Friday January 21, 2011.

PLACE:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-32782 Filed 12-23-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
(2004); see Moore u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 96 Nev. 415, 417, 610 

P.2d 188, 189 (1980) (determining that mandamus is not an appropriate 

remedy when resolution of the writ petition would not dispose of the entire 

controversy). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

, CA. 

Hardesty 

"c29104., 

Parraguirre 

J. 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge 

Fahrendorf, Viloria, Oliphant & Oster, LLP 

Zupancic Rothbone Law Group P.C. 

Law Offices of Jerry Carter, PC 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 19474 e 2
### §909. Forfeiture of grant on failure to make deposit

If any railroad corporation required by law to pay the costs of surveying, selecting, or conveying any lands granted to such corporation, or for its use and benefit, by any Act of Congress, shall, for ninety days from notice or demand by the Secretary of the Interior, as provided by section 908 of this title, neglect or refuse to deposit an amount sufficient to meet the expense of surveying, selecting, and conveying the unsurveyed lands granted to such company, or for its use and benefit, by any Act of Congress, and designated in the notice or demand by the Secretary of the Interior, as aforesaid, the rights, title, and interests of such company, and all those claiming by, through, or under it, in and to the unsurveyed lands designated in the notice of the Secretary, as aforesaid, shall cease and forfeit to the United States; and the Secretary of the Interior shall notify the Attorney General, who shall at once commence proceedings to declare the forfeiture and to restore the lands forfeited to the public domain.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 406, §2, 36 Stat. 834.)