alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001021810
<NAME>                        INTELIDATA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                              6,625
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,628
<ALLOWANCES>                         (296)
<INVENTORY>                            29
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   12,586
<PP&E>                              1,174
<DEPRECIATION>                       (732)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     13,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               6,855
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               32
<OTHER-SE>                          6,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       13,287
<SALES>                               416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    7,347
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    8,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (2,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (2,635)
<DISCONTINUED>                    (28,542)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (31,177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.99)
        

</TABLE>
ex_444126.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PACKAGE


 


 


Effective January 1, 2023, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) will pay each outside director who is independent in accordance with the NASDAQ and SEC rules governing director independence (an “Eligible Director”) the following for service to the Company:


 


	Annual Cash Retainer	 	$	50,000	 
	Attendance Fee for Each Board Meeting (including telephonic attendance)	 	$	3,000	 
	Attendance Fee for Each Committee Meeting (including telephonic attendance)	 	$	1,500	 



 


In addition, the Chair of each of the Audit Committee and the Social Impact Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $25,000. The Chair of each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $10,000. The Annual Cash Retainer and the Committee Chair fees will be paid in semi-annual installments.


 


Each Eligible Director also will receive a restricted stock award of 2,300 shares, such grant to be effective on January 2, 2023. The restricted stock award will vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.


 


The Company also will reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses that are incurred in connection with board and committee meetings.
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Un ited States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2871

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Kimberly Williams, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 13, 2007 Filed: April 26, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kimberly Williams appeals the denial of her motion requesting that the district court 1 recommend to the Bureau of Prisons thatshe be allowed to serve the last 6 months of her 18-month prison sentence at a community correction center. We dismiss the appeal as moot, because W illiams was released from custody on March 2, 2007. See Mills v. Green , 159 U.S. 651, 653 (1985) (when event occurs during pendency of appeal that renders it impossi ble for court, if it should decide case in favor of plaintiff, to grant effective re lief, court will dismiss appeal as moot).

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FATS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                     15,551
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,705
<PP&E>                                          10,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,223
<BONDS>                                         73,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,412
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,496
<OTHER-SE>                                    (165,990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,154
<SALES>                                         10,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,271
<CGS>                                            7,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (116)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,275)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.16)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31
                                                                    ----------

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Moshe Zarmi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinking Tools,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


<PAGE>


(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated: February __, 2004

                                 By: Moshe Zarmi
                                     ------------------------
                                 Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                 Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         and principal accounting officer
### §521. Sale of surplus waters generally

The Secretary of the Interior in connection with the operations under the reclamation law is authorized to enter into contract to supply water from any project irrigation system for other purposes than irrigation, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may deem proper: Provided, That the approval of such contract by the water-users' association or associations shall have first been obtained: Provided, That no such contract shall be entered into except upon a showing that there is no other practicable source of water supply for the purpose: Provided further, That no water shall be furnished for the uses aforesaid if the delivery of such water shall be detrimental to the water service for such irrigation project, nor to the rights of any prior appropriator: Provided further, That the moneys derived from such contracts shall be covered into the reclamation fund and be placed to the credit of the project from which such water is supplied.

(Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 86, 41 Stat. 451.)
#### § 884.121 Rights of owner if PHA defaults under agreement (private-owner/PHA projects).

The ACC and the Agreement shall contain a provision to the effect that in the event of failure of the PHA to comply with the Agreement with the Owner, the Owner shall have the right, if he is not in default, to demand that HUD determine, after notice to the PHA giving it a reasonable opportunity to take corrective action, whether a substantial default exists, and if HUD determines that such a default exists, that HUD assume the PHA's rights and obligations under the Agreement, and carry out the obligations of the PHA under the Agreement, including the obligation to enter into the Contract.
### §§501 to 502. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section 501, Pub. L. 91–518, title I, §101, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1328; Pub. L. 96–73, title I, §102, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 537; Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1171, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 687, related to congressional findings on needs for cost- and energy-efficient intercity rail passenger service. See section 24101 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 501a, Pub. L. 91–518, title I, §102, as added Pub. L. 96–73, title I, §103(a), Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 537; amended Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1172, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 688, enumerated goals established by Congress for Amtrak. See section 24101 of Title 49.

A prior section 102 of Pub. L. 91–518 was renumbered section 103 and classified to section 502 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b).

Section 502, Pub. L. 91–518, title I, §103, formerly §102, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1328; Pub. L. 93–146, §2, Nov. 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 548; renumbered §103 and amended Pub. L. 96–73, title I, §§103(a), 104, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 537, 538; Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1173, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 689; Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §4012, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 109; Pub. L. 102–533, §8, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3519, defined terms for purposes of this chapter. See section 24102 of Title 49, Transportation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 91–518, §1, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1327, as amended by Pub. L. 93–496, §12, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1531, provided that Pub. L. 91–518 (enacting this chapter and section 250 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, amending section 856 of former Title 31, Money and Finance, and enacting provision set out as a note under section 250 of Title 26) could be cited as the "Rail Passenger Service Act", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

[McGLADREY & PULLEN CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS LOGO]

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-119927 of Valley Bancorp on Form S-8 of our report, dated February 4, 2005
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Valley Bancorp for the year
ended December 31, 2004.

                                        /s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        McGladrey & Pullen, LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 24, 2005

McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is an independent member firm of RSM International, an
affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms.
### §§615dddd to 615jjjj. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 615dddd, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §501, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 969; Pub. L. 108–318, §1, Oct. 5, 2004, 118 Stat. 1211, authorized North Loup division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program, Nebraska, and described principal features of this division.

Section 615eeee, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §502, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 969, related to interest rates.

Section 615ffff, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §503, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 970, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife and enhancement of recreational opportunities in connection with this division.

Section 615gggg, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §504, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 970, related to integration of this division with other Federal works.

Section 615hhhh, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §505, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 970, related to limitations on diversion of waters.

Section 615iiii, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §506, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 970, related to newly irrigated lands.

Section 615jjjj, Pub. L. 92–514, title V, §507, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 970, authorized appropriations for this division.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Virginia Smith Dam and Calamus Lake Recreation Area

Pub. L. 101–359, Aug. 10, 1990, 104 Stat. 420, redesignated the Calamus Dam and Reservoir in the North Loup division of the Missouri River basin project as the Virginia Smith Dam and Calamus Lake Recreation Area, effective Jan. 3, 1991.
### §11504. Enforcement of forfeitures

When an offense by a seaman also is a criminal violation, it is not necessary that a criminal proceeding be brought to enforce a forfeiture.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 584.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11504 | 46:705 |

Section 11504 provides that when a seaman has committed a criminal offense, a forfeiture may be enforced through civil proceedings.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel Kimmel, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Motion by appellant to vacate order dated April 2, 1962, dismissing his appeal from an order which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus. Motion granted; order vacated; appeal ordered on the calendar for the November Term, beginning October 22, 1962; and appellant’s time to perfect the appeal enlarged accordingly. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Valley Bancorp ("the Registrant") pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
with respect to the Registrant's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
date hereof (the "Report"), that:


1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ Barry L. Hulin                                            /s/ Dick Holtzclaw
------------------                                            ------------------
Barry L. Hulin                                                    Dick Holtzclaw
Chief Executive Officer                                  Chief Financial Officer
Valley Bancorp                Date: March 15, 2006                Valley Bancorp
§ 401.474 Project accounts. ( a ) *Accounts from other projects.* The accounts listed in § 401.472(a)(1) may be used for other eligible projects only if: ( 1 ) The projects are included in a Consolidated Restructuring Plan under § 401.401; and
( 2 ) The funds are used for rehabilitation or to reduce a section 541(b) claim paid by HUD under § 401.471.
( b ) *Distribution to owner.* The Restructuring Plan may provide for a one-time distribution to the owner, not to exceed 10 percent of the excess funds in project accounts, to be released after completion of the rehabilitation required by the Restructuring Plan.
§ 3280.108 Interior passage. ( a ) Interior doors having passage hardware without a privacy lock, or with a privacy lock not engaged, shall open from either side by a single movement of the hardware mechanism in any direction.
( b ) Each manufactured home interior door, when provided with a privacy lock, shall have a privacy lock that has an emergency release on the outside to permit entry when the lock has been locked by a locking knob, lever, button, or other locking device on the inside.
( c ) All interior swinging doors must have a minimum clear opening of 27 inches except doors to toilet compartments in single-section homes (see § 3280.111(b)), and doors to closets and pantries.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 86 FR 2517, Jan. 12, 2021]
§ 599.103 Geographic and population requirements for a nominated area. ( a ) *Geographic requirements.* A nominated area must meet the following geographic requirements to be eligible for designation as a Renewal Community: ( 1 ) The area must be within the jurisdiction of one or more local governments.
( 2 ) The boundary of the area must be continuous. ( i ) The boundary line of the nominated area may be interrupted by jurisdictional boundaries, such as State or county lines, or natural boundaries, such as rivers, as long as the resulting area is entirely within the boundary line except for the interruptions.
( ii ) The nominated area may enclose an area or areas that are excluded from the nominated area, as long as each enclosed area to be excluded is within a continuous boundary line.
( 3 ) The nominated area may be any size, as long as it meets all of the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Population requirements* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a nominated area must have a population of not more than 200,000 and at least: ( i ) 4,000 if any portion of the area (other than a nominated rural area) is located within an MA which has a population of 50,000 or greater; or
( ii ) 1,000 in any other case.
( 2 ) *Nominated areas on Indian reservations.* A nominated area that is entirely within an Indian reservation (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior) is not subject to the population requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
#### MOCK et al., Appellants, v. KAUFMAN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 30, 1903.)

Action by Anna E. Mock and others against Mary Elizabeth Kaufman and others.

No opinion. This cause, having been passed twice, is for that reason stricken from the calendar, and the appeal dismissed, under Gen. Rules Prac. 39.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alejandro Correa, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 434]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered on or about October 12, 2005, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

*349Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
### §390zz–1. Severability

If any provision of this subchapter or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of this subchapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §230, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1274.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title II (§§201–230) of Pub. L. 97–293, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1263, known as the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982, which enacted this subchapter, amended sections 373a, 422e, 425b, and 485h of this title, and repealed section 383 of Title 25, Indians. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see Tables.