Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 76753 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves the 

establishment of a safety zone and 

therefore it is categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant 

Instruction. An environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T09–1012 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T09–1012 Safety Zone; Vessel 

Launch; Menominee River; Marinette, WI. 

(a) Location. All waters of the 

Menominee River in the vicinity of 

Marinette Marine Corporation, between 

the Bridge Street Bridge located in 

position 45°06′12′′ N, 087°37′34′′ W and 

a line crossing the river perpendicularly 

passing through position 45°05′57′′ N, 

087°36′43′′ W, in the vicinity of the 

Ansul Company (NAD 83). 

(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. 

This zone will be effective and enforced 

from 12:45 p.m. until 3:15 p.m. on 

December 18, 2013. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23 of 

this part, entry into, transiting, or 

anchoring within the safety zone is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or 

his designated on-scene representative. 

(2) The safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic, except as may be 

permitted by the Captain of the Port, 

Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative. 

(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of 

the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, 

is any Coast Guard commissioned, 

warrant or petty officer who has been 

designated by the Captain of the Port, 

Lake Michigan, to act on his behalf. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone shall 

contact the Captain of the Port, Lake 

Michigan, or his on-scene representative 

to obtain permission to do so. The 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative may be 

contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel 

operators given permission to enter or 

operate in the safety zone must comply 

with all directions given to them by the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative. 

Dated: December 9, 2013. 

M.W. Sibley, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30173 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 60 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0011; FRL–9904–06– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AS03 

Standards of Performance for 

Petroleum Refineries for Which 

Construction, Reconstruction, or 

Modification Commenced After May 14, 

2007 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to amend the Standards of 

Performance for Petroleum Refineries 

for Which Construction, Reconstruction, 

or Modification Commenced After May 

14, 2007. This direct final rule amends 

the definition of ‘‘delayed coking unit’’ 

by removing process piping and 

associated equipment (pumps, valves, 

and connectors) from the definition. 

This final rule also removes a redundant 

definition of ‘‘delayed coking unit’’ from 

the rule text. 

DATES: This rule is effective on March 

19, 2014 without further notice, unless 

the EPA receives adverse comment by 

February 3, 2014. If the EPA receives 

adverse comment, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that some 

or all of the amendments in the final 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your 

comments, identified by Docket ID 

Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0011, by 

one of the following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

Attention Docket ID Number EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2007–0011. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. Attention 

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2007–0011. 

• Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send 

comments to: EPA Docket Center, EPA 

West (Air Docket), Attention Docket ID 

Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0011, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

Please include a total of two copies. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA West (Air 

Docket), Room 3334, 1301 Constitution 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004. 

Attention Docket ID Number EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2007–0011. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions. Direct your comments to 

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2007–0011. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be confidential 

business information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means the EPA will not know your 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
76754 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, the EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, the EPA may not 

be able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should not include 

special characters or any form of 

encryption and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about the EPA’s public docket, visit the 

EPA Docket Center homepage at: 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

We request that you also send a 

separate copy of each comment to the 

contact person listed below (see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Brenda Shine, Sector Policies and 

Programs Division (E143–01), Office of 

Air Quality Planning and Standards, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; 

telephone number: (919) 541–3608; fax 

number: (919) 541–0246; and email 

address: shine.brenda@epa.gov. For 

information about the applicability of 

the New Source Performance Standards 

(NSPS) to a particular entity, contact 

Maria Malave, Office of Enforcement 

and Compliance Assurance (OECA), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

telephone number: (202) 564–7027; fax 

number: (202) 564–0050; and email 

address: malave.maria@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Organization of This Document. The 

information in this preamble is 

organized as follows: 

I. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? 

II. Does this direct final rule apply to me? 

III. What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for the EPA? 

IV. What are the amendments made by this 

direct final rule? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

To Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

K. Congressional Review Act 

I. Why is the EPA using a direct final 

rule? 

The EPA is publishing this direct final 

rule without a prior proposed rule 

because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. However, in the 

‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s 

Federal Register, we are publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposed rule to the Standards of 

Performance for Petroleum Refineries 

for Which Construction, Reconstruction 

or Modification Commenced After May 

14, 2007 (40 CFR part 60 subpart Ja), if 

adverse comments are received on this 

direct final rule. If EPA receives adverse 

comment on all or a distinct portion of 

this rule, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that some of this 

rule or this entire direct final rule will 

not take effect. The rule provisions that 

are not withdrawn will become effective 

on the date set out above, 

notwithstanding adverse comment on 

any other provision, unless we 

determine that it would not be 

appropriate to promulgate those 

provisions due to their being affected by 

the provision for which we receive 

adverse comments. We would address 

all public comments in any subsequent 

final rule based on the proposed rule. 

We will not institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. For further information about 

commenting on this rule, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this document. 

II. Does this direct final rule apply to 

me? 

Categories and entities potentially 

regulated by this final rule include: 

Category NAICS 

Code 1 Examples of regulated entities 

Industry .......................................................................................... 32411 Petroleum refiners. 

Federal government ...................................................................... .................... Not affected. 

State/local/tribal government ......................................................... .................... Not affected. 

1 North American Industry Classification System 

This table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

regulated by this direct final rule. To 

determine whether your facility would 

be regulated by this direct final rule, 

you should examine the applicability 

criteria in 40 CFR 60.100a. If you have 

any questions regarding the 

applicability of this direct final rule to 

a particular entity, contact the persons 

listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

III. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for the EPA? 

Submitting CBI. Do not submit 

information containing CBI to the EPA 

through http://www.regulations.gov or 

email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 

information that you claim to be CBI. 

For CBI information on a disk or CD– 

ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the 

outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI 

and then identify electronically within 

the disk or CD–ROM the specific 

information that is claimed as CBI. In 

addition to one complete version of the 

comments that includes information 

claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy 

of the comments that does not contain 

the information claimed as CBI for 

inclusion in the public docket. If you 

submit a CD–ROM or disk that does not 

contain CBI, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM clearly that it does not 

contain CBI. Information not marked as 

CBI will be included in the public 

docket and the EPA’s electronic public 

docket without prior notice. Information 

marked as CBI will not be disclosed 

except in accordance with procedures 

set forth in 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) part 2. Send or 

deliver information identified as CBI 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 76755 

only to the following address: Roberto 

Morales, OAQPS Document Control 

Officer (C404–02), OAQPS, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711, and Attention Docket ID Number 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0011. 

IV. What are the amendments made by 

this direct final rule? 

Presently, ‘‘delayed coking unit’’ is 

defined as follows: 

Delayed coking unit means a refinery process 

unit in which high molecular weight 

petroleum derivatives are thermally cracked 

and petroleum coke is produced in a series 

of closed, batch system reactors. A delayed 

coking unit includes, but is not limited to, all 

of the coke drums associated with a single 

fractionator; the fractionator, including the 

bottoms receiver and the overhead 

condenser; the coke drum cutting water and 

quench system, including the jet pump and 

coker quench water tank; process piping and 

associated equipment such as pumps, valves 

and connectors; and the coke drum 

blowdown recovery compressor system. 

40 CFR 60.101a. This direct final rule 

amends the definition of ‘‘delayed 

coking unit’’ by removing the phrase 

‘‘process piping and associated 

equipment such as pumps, valves and 

connectors.’’ Emissions from process 

piping and associated equipment 

(pumps, valves and connectors) are 

already covered under 40 CFR part 60, 

subparts GGG or GGGa; the controls 

required under this rule (40 CFR part 

60, subpart Ja) do not address the 

emissions from such equipment. Rather, 

this rule addresses emissions from the 

delayed coking unit’s process vent. 

Although we included process piping 

and associated equipment in the 

definition of ‘‘delayed coking unit’’ 

because it is necessary to operate the 

delayed coking unit, the inclusion of 

this equipment within the definition 

results in very minor changes, such as 

adding a few valves and connectors for 

a new sample point or pressure gauge, 

to be considered a ‘‘modification’’ of the 

delayed coking unit. This is because, 

under the definition above, these 

additional valves would increase 

emissions from the delayed coking unit 

even though the increase would not 

occur at emissions points regulated 

under this rule. See 40 CFR 60.14. This 

was an inadvertent result as the EPA did 

not intend for such small changes to 

process piping and associated 

equipment (such as pumps, valves and 

connectors, which, as noted above, are 

regulated elsewhere), to constitute a 

modification of the delayed coking unit 

under 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ja. As a 

result, this modification would require 

immediate compliance with the coke 

drum vent control requirements in 40 

CFR 60.103a(i). Thus, we are removing 

this phrase from the definition. 

This direct final rule also removes a 

redundant definition of ‘‘delayed coking 

unit’’ from 40 CFR 60.101a. When 40 

CFR part 60, subpart Ja, was amended 

on September 12, 2012 (77 FR 56422), 

we added new definitions that preceded 

the old definition of ‘‘delayed coking 

unit’’ alphabetically, and we amended 

the then-existing definition of ‘‘delayed 

coking unit.’’ However, the old 

definition of ‘‘delayed coking unit’’ was 

not removed from the CFR when these 

other changes were made. Therefore, 

this direct final rule removes the old 

definition of ‘‘delayed coking unit,’’ as 

it is no longer accurate and may be 

confusing to stakeholders. 

Comments on this direct final rule are 

to be limited to issues directly 

associated with the amended definition 

of ‘‘delayed coking unit.’’ 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and is therefore not 

subject to review under Executive 

Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose any new 

information collection burden because it 

does not change the information 

collection requirements. However, OMB 

has previously approved the 

information collection requirements 

contained in the existing rule (40 CFR 

part 60, subpart Ja) under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 

U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and has assigned 

OMB control number 2060–0602. The 

OMB control numbers for the EPA’s 

regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small entities include small businesses, 

small organizations and small 

governmental jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impact 

of this final action on small entities, 

small entity is defined as: (1) a small 

business whose parent company has no 

more than 1,500 employees, that is 

primarily engaged in refining crude 

petroleum into refined petroleum as 

defined by NAICS code 32411 (as 

defined by Small Business 

Administration size standards); (2) a 

small governmental jurisdiction that is a 

government of a city, county, town, 

school district or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000; and (3) 

a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of this final rule on small 

entities, I certify that this action will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

In determining whether a rule has a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

impact of concern is any significant 

adverse economic impact on small 

entities, since the primary purpose of 

the regulatory flexibility analyses is to 

identify and address regulatory 

alternatives ‘‘which minimize any 

significant economic impact of the rule 

on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 

Thus, an agency may certify that a rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities if the rule relieves regulatory 

burden, or otherwise has a positive 

economic effect on all of the small 

entities subject to the rule. 

This rule will not impose any 

requirements on small entities, and no 

small entities are expected to incur 

annualized costs as a result of the 

amendments. The amendments may 

reduce burden for small entities with 

delayed coking units. We have 

determined that the amendments will 

not result in any ‘‘significant’’ adverse 

economic impact for small entities. This 

amendment does not create any new 

requirements or burdens, and no costs 

are associated with this amendment. We 

have, therefore, concluded that this final 

rule will relieve regulatory burden for 

all affected small entities. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This rule does not contain a federal 

mandate that may result in expenditures 

of $100 million or more for state, local 

and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 

or the private sector in any one year. 

The costs of the final amendments 

would not increase costs associated 

with the final rule. Thus, this rule is not 

subject to the requirements of sections 

202 or 205 of the UMRA. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
76756 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

This rule is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. The 

final amendments contain no 

requirements that apply to such 

governments and impose no obligations 

upon them. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This action does 

not modify existing responsibilities or 

create new responsibilities among EPA 

Regional offices, states or local 

enforcement agencies. Thus, Executive 

Order 13132 does not apply to this 

action. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). The final amendments impose no 

requirements on tribal governments. 

Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 

apply to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying to those regulatory actions that 

concern health or safety risks, such that 

the analysis required under section 5– 

501 of the Executive Order has the 

potential to influence the regulation. 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13045 because it is based solely 

on technology performance. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 

2001)), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law No. 

104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 

directs the EPA to use voluntary 

consensus standards (VCS) in its 

regulatory activities, unless to do so 

would be inconsistent with applicable 

law or otherwise impractical. VCS are 

technical standards (e.g., materials 

specifications, test methods, sampling 

procedures and business practices) that 

are developed or adopted by VCS 

bodies. The NTTAA directs the EPA to 

provide Congress, through OMB, 

explanations when the agency decides 

not to use available and applicable VCS. 

This direct final rule does not involve 

technical standards. Therefore, the EPA 

did not consider the use of any VCS. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

The EPA has determined that this 

direct final rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. The final amendments 

are either clarifications or compliance 

alternatives which will neither increase 

or decrease environmental protection. 

K. Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing these final 

rules and other required information to 

the United States Senate, the United 

States House of Representatives and the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the final 

rules in the Federal Register. A major 

rule cannot take effect until 60 days 

after it is published in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This 

direct final rule will be effective on 

March 19, 2014. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: December 4, 2013. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 60—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 60 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

Subpart Ja—[AMENDED] 

■ 2. Section 60.101a is amended by: 

■ a. Removing the first definition of 

‘‘delayed coking unit’’ that occurs out of 

alphabetical order between the terms 

‘‘contact material’’ and ‘‘corrective 

action’’ and 

■ b. Revising the second definition of 

‘‘delayed coking unit.’’ The revisions 

read as follows: 

§ 60.101a Definitions. 

* * * * * 

Delayed coking unit means a refinery 

process unit in which high molecular 

weight petroleum derivatives are 

thermally cracked and petroleum coke 

is produced in a series of closed, batch 

system reactors. A delayed coking unit 

includes, but is not limited to, all of the 

coke drums associated with a single 

fractionator; the fractionator, including 

the bottoms receiver and the overhead 

condenser; the coke drum cutting water 

and quench system, including the jet 

pump and coker quench water tank; and 

the coke drum blowdown recovery 

compressor system. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–29731 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES