alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 570.464 Project closeout.

HUD will advise the recipient to initiate closeout procedures when HUD determines, in consultation with the recipient, that there are not impediments to closeout. Closeout shall be carried out in accordance with § 570.509 and applicable HUD guidelines.

[53 FR 8058, Mar. 11, 1988]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard V. Secord, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc. ("CTI");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) Sll significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 13, 2006

/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Acting Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3256 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3256

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 3038 West Liberty Avenue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the 
   ``Congressman James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3038 
West Liberty in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Congressman James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Congressman James Grove 
Fulton Memorial Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 25, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 77486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26559]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Publication of the Tier 2 Tax Rates

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Publication of the tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2021 as 
required by section 3241(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. Tier 2 taxes 
on railroad employees, employers, and employee representatives are one 
source of funding for benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act.

DATES: The tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2021 apply to 
compensation paid in calendar year 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Edmondson, CC:EEE:EOET:ET1, 
Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20224, Telephone Number (202) 317-6798 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TIER 2 TAX RATES: The tier 2 tax rate for 
2021 under section 3201(b) on employees is 4.9 percent of compensation. 
The tier 2 tax rate for 2021 under section 3221(b) on employers is 13.1 
percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2021 under section 
3211(b) on employee representatives is 13.1 percent of compensation.

    Dated: November 20, 2020.
Rachel D. Levy,
Associate Chief Counsel (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations and 
Employment Taxes).
[FR Doc. 2020-26559 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3002 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3002

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2005

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN DRAWBACK CLAIMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the 
drawback claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c).
    (b) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts due pursuant to the 
liquidation or reliquidation of the claims described in subsection (c) 
shall be paid not later than 90 days after the date of such liquidation 
or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
                   Drawback claim number                     Filing date
 
AA6-0246691-1                                                  12/02/94
AA6-0246692-9                                                  11/30/94
AA6-0246668-9                                                  10/19/94
AA6-0302735-7                                                  03/21/97
AA6-0312303-2                                                  12/04/01
 

                                 <all>
```
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of April 5, 2002, is
by and between InteliData Technologies  Corporation,  a Delaware corporation and
Alfred S. Dominick,  Jr. ("Executive") and amends the Employment Agreement dated
April 5, 1999 between  InteliData and the Executive as follows:

        1.     Section  2 of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced  in  its
               entirety by the following:

               "2. Term.  The period of  employment  shall be from April 5, 1999
               through  April 5, 2003,  unless  sooner  terminated as herein set
               forth."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT as of the fifth day of April 2002.

                               InteliData Technologies Corporation



                                     By:   William F. Gorog
                                     --------------------------------


                                     /s/ Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
                                     --------------------------------
                                     Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Status Conference - 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Laurel Headley (CSBN 152306) 

 Email: headley@achlaw.com

ARGUEDAS, CASSMAN & HEADLEY, LLP 

803 Hearst Avenue 

Berkeley, CA 94710 

(510) 845-3000 

(510) 845-3003 (fax)

Attorneys for Graeson Prescott 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GRAESON PRESCOTT, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. CR 09-001135 CRB 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE ON 

FORM 12 SCHEDULED FOR DECEMBER 16, 

2015 TO JANUARY 20, 2016 

This supervised release matter is on for status conference on December 16, 2015. On 

November 17, 2015, Mr. Prescott was charged by Information in a new criminal case (U.S. v. 

Prescott, CR-15-535 CRB –Dkt 1). The instant violation is based on the same conduct as that 

alleged in the new case. On November 12, 2015, the government produced discovery to the 

defense and the parties are in the process of finalizing a proposed plea agreement in the new 

case. The defense requests additional time to review discovery and continue plea discussions 

related to this supervised release violation matter and the related new case. It is the parties’ 

expectation that Mr. Prescott will change his plea at the next appearance and that this 

supervised release violation will be resolved at the same time. Counsel for the defense is 

unavailable between December 18, 2015 and January 5, 2016. 

Case 3:09-cr-01135-CRB Document 77 Filed 12/11/15 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Status Conference - 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that this matter be continued 

from December 16, 2015 to January 20, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. for change of plea. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED: 

December 10, 2015 United States Attorney’s Office 

 By: ____________/s/_____________________ 

 RITA F. LIN 

December 10, 2015 Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, LLP 

 By: ___________/s/______________________ 

 LAUREL HEADLEY 

 Attorney for Graeson Prescott 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: _____________ _ ____________________ _____ 

 THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER 

 Senior United States District Judge 

12/11/2015

Case 3:09-cr-01135-CRB Document 77 Filed 12/11/15 Page 2 of 2
#### § 234.259 Claim procedure—graduated payment mortgages.

Section 203.436 of this chapter applies to mortgages under this subpart.

[61 FR 60163, Nov. 26, 1996]
### §10906. Discharge of crew for unsuitability

When a survey is made at a foreign port, the surveyors shall state in the report whether, in their opinion, the vessel had been sent to sea unsuitably provided in any important particular, by neglect or design or through mistake or accident. If by neglect or design, and the consular officer approves the finding, the officer shall discharge a seaman requesting discharge and shall require the master to pay one month's wages to that seaman in addition to wages then due, or sufficient money for the return of the seaman to the nearest and most convenient port of the United States, whichever is the greater amount.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 576.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 10906 | 46:658 |

Section 10906 provides that if a consular officer finds that a vessel has been sent to sea in an unsuitable state, a crew member requesting discharge must be paid one month's additional wages and passage to the United States.
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 4, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00572

- CR

Fernando LOPEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texa s Trial Court No. 12

- 2454

- CR Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due January 3, 2014; however, the court granted appellant a thirty

- day extension of time . A ppellant has filed a motion requesting an additional fourteen

- day extension until February 17, 2014, to file the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellant to file the brief by February 1 8 , 2014

. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Any request for a further extension of time must (1) show extraordinary circumstances, (2) advise the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief

, and (3) provide the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline

.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHER EOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.2







Independent Accountant’s Report








Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)


One Wells Fargo Center


301 South College Street


Charlotte, NC 28288





U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)


Corporate Trust Department


100 Wall Street


New York, NY 10005








Re:
STRATSTrust For IBM Corporation Securities, Series 2004-7 (the “Trust”)




Ladies and Gentlemen:





We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the “Trustee” and together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of June 15, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), in respect of the STRATS Trust For IBM Corporation Securities, Series 2004-7 (the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination.





Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2011.








/s/ Aston Bell, CPA





New York, New York


March 16, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 233 (Thursday, December 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90526; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-77]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Deemed Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Rule 8.601 
(Active Proxy Portfolio Shares) and Rule 8.900 (Managed Portfolio 
Shares), Amend the Preamble to Rule 8P, and Amend Section 302.00 of the 
Listed Company Manual

November 27, 2020.
    On September 22, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ 
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to adopt Rule 
8.601 (Active Proxy Portfolio Shares) and Rule 8.900 (Managed Portfolio 
Shares), amend the preamble to Rule 8P, and amend Section 302.00 of the 
Listed Company Manual to accommodate the listing of Active Proxy 
Portfolio Shares and Managed Portfolio Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal 
Register on October 9, 2020.\3\ The Commission received no comment 
letters on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90091 (Oct. 5, 
2020), 85 FR 64194.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As of November 23, 2020, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(D) of the 
Act,\4\ the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2020-77) was deemed to have 
been approved by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(D).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26596 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001021907
<NAME> MS ACQUISITIONS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,797
<INVENTORY>                                     96,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               315,515
<PP&E>                                         183,012
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 575,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,101
<BONDS>                                        192,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     41,059
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,230)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   575,919
<SALES>                                        322,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               322,251
<CGS>                                          285,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  285,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,356
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,928
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,490
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Record of Phone Call 

April 2nd, 2012 

Al’s Aerial Spraying, LLC 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-### 

On April 2nd, 2012 Lyle Petik from the Fort Worth Aircraft Certification Office phoned 

Mr. Schiffer, (Partner, Al’s Aerial Spraying, LLC) to discuss the origin of the original 

3300 lb hopper load limitation on the 502B exemption. 

Mr. Schiffer described basic operations, spray materials and weights. Mr. Petik and Mr. 

Schiffer discussed useful loads and loading calculations for the Air Tractor models 502B, 

502, 402B and 400. 

Mr. Schiffer also expressed his preference for the exemption on the requested models, 

including the 502B, to be limited by useful load instead of setting a hopper weight limit. 

Mr. Schiffer stated this would allow additional operational flexibility by exchanging fuel 

weight for more hopper load. 

This information is being added to the public docket.