alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

November 18, 2004

John Lowber, (907) 868-5628; jlowber@gci.com
Bruce Broquet, (907) 868-6660; bbroquet@gci.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

GCI, INC. ANNOUNCES PRICING OF $70 MILLION OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR NOTES

ANCHORAGE, AK -- General Communication, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNCMA) ("GCI") announced
today that its wholly-owned subsidiary GCI, Inc. has priced the offering
announced this morning to sell $70 million in aggregate principal amount of
additional senior notes due 2014 in a private placement.

GCI, Inc. will pay interest of 7.25 percent on the notes and the notes will be
sold at par with a yield to maturity of 7.247 percent. Under the relevant
indenture, the additional notes will be treated as a single class with the
existing senior notes that were originally issued on February 17, 2004.

The sale of the additional notes is expected to close on December 7, 2004.

The notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction and may not be offered or sold
in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
registration requirements.

GCI is the largest Alaska-based and operated integrated telecommunications
provider. A pioneer in bundled services, GCI provides local, wireless, and long
distance telephone, cable television, Internet and data communication services.
More information about the company can be found at www.gci.com.

The foregoing contains forward-looking statements regarding the company's
expected results that are based on management's expectations as well as on a
number of assumptions concerning future events. Actual results might differ
materially from those projected in the forward looking statements due to
uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside GCI's control.
Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those in the forward looking statements is contained in
GCI's cautionary statement sections of Form 10-K and 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
## Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under	EO

12866	and	EO	13563 Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review. **Interagency	Comments	on	U.S. Environmental	Protection	Agency	(EPA)	draft**  **final	rule	titled, “Protection	of	Stratospheric	Ozone:**  **Change	of	Listing	Status	for	Certain	Substitutes	Under the	Significant	New	Alternatives	Policy	(SNAP)	Program,”	(RIN**  **2060 -**  **AS18)** Comment on Table 24 of Economic Analysis: Will EPA provide some type of explanation for the basis of the statement that 99% of small business manufacturers would experience no costs in complying with the rulemaking? The commenter expects that this might be true for end

- users, but manufacturers need to perform R&D work, lab approvals, field evaluations and employee training etc. Below is the text from the analysis that is being refe renced. **Error! Reference source not found.** aggregates the estimated economic impacts on small businesses, according to the categories set out in the SISNOSE decision matrix. For the most c onservative assessment, **Error! Reference source not found.** reflects the higher cost ranges for each end

- use and a 7% discount rate. Using the decision criteria established in **Error! Reference source not found.** , this screening analysis suggests that this rulemaking can be presumed to have **no SISNOSE** for the following reasons:  More than 99% of small businesses subject to this rulemaking would be expected to experience zero compliance costs.  For about 120 small businesses that are expected to incur compliance costs as a result of this rulemaking, their costs are estimated to be less than 1% of annual s ales.  This analysis indicates that fewer than 80 of the nearly 500,000 affected small businesses

—or <0.1%

—could incur costs in excess of 1% of annual sales, and that fewer than 60 small businesses could incur costs in excess of 3% of annual sales. These es timates are below the thresholds for a substantial number determination (i.e., fewer than 100 businesses, and less than 20% of affected entities).
In the Supreme Court of Georgia

 Decided: October 19, 2015

S15A1475. ALEXIS v. SHAW.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed without opinion pursuant

to Supreme Court Rule 59.

Affirmed without opinion. All the Justices concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PORT SECURITY ZONES

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

Pub. L. 111–330, §1(16), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3570, amended Pub. L. 111–281, title VIII, §828(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 3005, which added subchapter II heading.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1
------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.,
(the "Company") on form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date: February 18, 2003                         /s/ Richard V. Secord
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Richard V. Secord
                                                Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                                Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.,
(the "Company") on form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Bernard J. Brady, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date: February 18, 2003                          /s/ Bernard J. Brady
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Bernard J. Brady
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                       32
###### Editorial Note on Part 5

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

#### § 5.1005 Electronic submission of applications for grants and other financial assistance.

Applicants described under 24 CFR 5.1001 are required to submit electronic applications or plans for grants and other financial assistance in response to any application that HUD has placed on the *www.grants.gov/Apply* Web site or its successor. The HUD Assistant Secretary, General Deputy Assistant Secretary or, the individual authorized to perform duties and responsibilities of these positions, with authority over the specific program for which the waiver is sought, may in writing, waive the electronic submission requirement for an applicant on the basis of good cause.

[70 FR 77294, Dec. 29, 2005]
§ 26.14 Answer. ( a ) Respondent shall file an answer within 30 days of receipt of the complaint, unless otherwise specified in this title or ordered by the hearing officer.
( b ) The answer shall: ( 1 ) Respond specifically to each factual allegation contained in the complaint;
( 2 ) Specifically plead any affirmative defense; and
( 3 ) Set forth any mitigating factors or extenuating circumstances.
( c ) A general denial shall not be permitted. Allegations are admitted when not specifically denied in respondent's answer.
#### BARTLETT, Appellant, v. BARTLETT, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

April Term, 1903.)

Action by Walter Bartlett against Mary Bartlett.

PER CURIAM.

Order modified, as directed in opinion, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. [Nothing for publication in this case.]
EXHIBIT 23.1

|        |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                              |
|--------|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | 1900 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite East 210Boca Raton, FL 33431Tel: 561.886.4200Fax: 561.886.3330email: info@sherbcpa.com    Offices in New York and Florida |
|        |

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Certified Public Accountants

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of DirectorsMDwerks, Inc.

We hereby consent to the use in Form 10-KSB/A of our report dated February 9, 2007 on the consolidated financial statements of MDwerks, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and for the year then ended.

|  | Certified Public Accountants |
|--|------------------------------|

April 30, 2007

----
#### § 401.314 Environmental review responsibilities.

HUD will retain all responsibility for environmental review under part 50 of this title. Compliance with part 50 of this title will be completed before any HUD approval of the Restructuring Commitment under § 401.405.
§ 27.105 Service of Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale. ( a ) The Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale shall be served in accordance with the provisions of the Statute. When notice is sent by mail, multiple mailings are not required to be sent to any party with multiple capacities, e.g., an original mortgagor who is the security property owner and lives in one of the units. The date of the receipt for the postage paid for the mailing may serve as proof of the date of mailing of the notice.
( b ) Notice need not be mailed to any mortgagors who have been released from all obligations under the mortgage.
§ 3286.303 Responsibilities of qualified trainers. ( a ) *Curriculum and hours.* In providing training to installers for the purpose of qualifying installers under the HUD-administered installation program, qualified trainers must adequately address the curriculum and instruction-time requirements established in subparts C and D of this part.
( b ) *Attendance records.* Qualified trainers must maintain records of the times, locations, names of attendees at each session, and content of all courses offered. When an attendee misses a significant portion of any training session, the trainer must assure that the attendee makes up the missed portion of the instruction.
( c ) *Certificates of completion of training.* Qualified trainers must provide certificates of completion to course attendees that indicate the level of compliance with the applicable curriculum and time requirements under subparts C and D of this part.
( d ) *Record retention.* All records maintained by trainers and continuing education providers must be retained for 3 years, and must be made available to HUD upon request.
( e ) *Testing of installers.* Qualified trainers may be authorized to administer the installation license testing required for initial licensing of installers, as set forth in § 3286.205(c).
### §§616mmmm to 616ssss. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616mmmm, Pub. L. 91–270, §1, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 273, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Merlin Division, Rogue River Basin project, Oregon.

Section 616nnnn, Pub. L. 91–270, §2, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 273, related to irrigation repayment contracts and assessment and collection of service charges.

Section 616oooo, Pub. L. 91–270, §3, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 273, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife and to enhancement of recreational opportunities in connection with this division.

Section 616pppp, Pub. L. 91–270, §4, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 273, related to transfer of care, operation, and maintenance of this division to water user's organization.

Section 616qqqq, Pub. L. 91–270, §5, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 273, authorized power for irrigation water pumping.

Section 616rrrr, Pub. L. 91–270, §6, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 273, related to restriction on delivery of water for production of excessive basic commodities.

Section 616ssss, Pub. L. 91–270, §7, May 28, 1970, 84 Stat. 274, authorized appropriations for this division.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald E. Wise, Appellant.

Appeal from the denial of a writ of error *coram nobis.*County Court, Chemung County. Defendant’s motion for a writ of error *coram nobis*has been denied without a hearing. The basis of the application is that defendant’s assigned counsel had assured him he would receive a suspended sentence; but that on April 7,1959 the Judge actually sentenced defendant to Elmira Reformatory. He also alleges that his assigned lawyer was incompetent. No ease requiring a trial is made out; the assurance of a suspended sentence is not attributed to the Judge or the prosecutor; nor has any fair showing of lack of skill or professional care been made as to assigned counsel who appeared three times in court with defendant and who is a lawyer of standing and ability at the Bar. Order unanimously affirmed. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# AGENCY:

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of members of senior executive service performance review board.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the membership of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB) Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB).

# DATES:

These appointments were effective on October 20, 2020.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments concerning this notice to: Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Vanessa D. Prout by telephone at (202) 694-7021 or by email at                         *VanessaP@dnfsb.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

5 U.S.C. 4314 (c)(1) through (5) requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more performance review boards. The PRB shall review and evaluate the initial summary rating of the senior executives' performance, the executives' responses, and the higher level officials' comments on the initial summary rating. In addition, the PRB will review and recommend executive performance bonuses and pay increases.                          ( print page 77456)    

The DNFSB is a small, independent Federal agency; therefore, the members of the DNFSB SES Performance Review Board listed in this notice are drawn from the SES ranks of other agencies. The following persons comprise a standing roster to serve as members of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board SES Performance Review Board:

Dolline L. Hatchett, Director, Office of Safety Recommendations and Communications, National Transportation Safety Board

Jessica S. Bartlett, Regional Director, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington Regional Office

Catherine Haney, Assistant for Operations, Office of the Executive Director for Operations, Nuclear Regulation Commission

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4314.

Dated: November 25, 2020.

Thomas A. Summers,

Acting Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2020-26531 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
### §50106. Studies on the operation of vessels

(a) Relative Costs.—The Secretary of Transportation shall investigate, determine, and keep current records of the relative cost of marine insurance, maintenance, repairs, wages and subsistence of officers and crews, and all other items of expense, in the operation of comparable vessels under the laws and regulations of the United States and those of the foreign countries whose vessels are substantial competitors of American vessels.

(b) Shipyards.—The Secretary shall investigate, determine, and keep current records of the number, location, and efficiency of shipyards in the United States.

(c) Navigation Laws.—The Secretary shall examine the navigation laws and regulations of the United States and make such recommendations to Congress as the Secretary considers proper for the amendment, improvement, and revision of those laws and for the development of the merchant marine of the United States.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1559.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50106(a) | 46 App.:811 (1st sentence words after 1st comma). | Sept. 7, 1916, ch. 451, §12 (1st sentence words after 1st comma, 3d sentence), 39 Stat. 732; Ex. Ord. No. 6166, §12, eff. June 10, 1933; June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §204, title IX, §904, 49 Stat. 1987, 2016; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(27), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 155. |
| | 46 App.:1121(e). | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §211(e), (g), 49 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 91–469, §§4(2), 5, 35(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1018, 1035; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(67), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 159. |
| 50106(b) | 46 App.:1121(g). | |
| 50106(c) | 46 App.:811 (3d sentence). | |

Section

In subsection (b), the words "existing on June 29, 1936, or thereafter built" are omitted as obsolete.
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                  |
| /s/ WALTER G. BORST                                                                         |
| Walter G. BorstExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
Fact Sheet

SOCIAL SECURITY 

SSA Press Office 440 Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235 410-965-8904 FAX 410-966-9973 

Social Security Is Important to Women 

Social Security is neutral with respect to gender – individuals with identical earnings histories are treated 

the same in terms of benefits. This Fact Sheet is provided by the Social Security Administration to highlight 

how women benefit from the Social Security program and how certain demographic characteristics of 

women compare with the entire population. 

• With longer life expectancies than men, elderly women tend to live more years in retirement and have a 

greater chance of exhausting other sources of income. They benefit from Social Security's cost-of-living 

protections because benefits are annually adjusted for inflation. 

o Women reaching age 65 in 2007 are expected to live, on average, an additional 19.8 years compared 

with 17.5 years for men. 

o Women represent 57 percent of all Social Security beneficiaries age 62 and older and approximately 

69 percent of beneficiaries age 85 and older. 

• The Social Security system is progressive in that lower-wage earners receive a higher percentage benefit 

than higher-wage earners do. The system returns a greater percentage of pre-retirement earnings to a lowerwage worker than to a higher-wage worker. Women who are low-wage workers receive back more benefits 

in relation to past earnings than do high-wage earners. 

o In 2007, the median earnings of working-age women who worked full-time, year-round were 

$35,000, compared to $45,000 for men. 

• In 2007, the average annual Social Security income received by women 65 years and older was $10,685, 

compared to $14,055 for men. Social Security provides dependent benefits to spouses, divorced spouses, 

elderly widows, and widows with young children. 

o In 2007, for unmarried women – including widows – age 65 and older, Social Security comprises 

48 percent of their total income. In contrast, Social Security benefits comprise only 37 percent of 

unmarried elderly men's income and only 30 percent of elderly couples' income. 

• In 2007, 47 percent of all elderly unmarried females receiving Social Security benefits relied on Social 

Security for 90 percent or more of their income. 

• Elderly women are less likely than elderly men to have significant family income from pensions other than 

Social Security. In 2004, only 24 percent of unmarried women aged 65 or older were receiving their own 

private pensions (either as a retired worker or survivor), compared to 30 percent of unmarried men. 
o Participation in employer-sponsored retirement plans is increasing for women in today's workforce. 

In 2007, 52.6 percent of women employed full-time participated in an employer-sponsored private 

sector plan compared to 51.6 percent of men. Women generally receive lower pension benefits due 

to their relatively lower earnings. 

Our website at www.socialsecurity.gov/women contains more information of interest to women. 

This fact sheet is designed to provide general information and does not apply to all individuals within the female 

population.