alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §12120. Liquified gas tankers

Notwithstanding any agreement with the United States Government, the Secretary may issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for a vessel to transport liquified natural gas or liquified petroleum gas to Puerto Rico from other ports in the United States, if the vessel—

(1) is a foreign built vessel that was built before October 19, 1996; or

(2) was documented under this chapter before that date, even if the vessel is placed under a foreign registry and subsequently redocumented under this chapter for operation under this section.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §5, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1504.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 12120 | 46 App.:883 note. | Pub. L. 104–324, title VII, §1120(f), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3978. |

Section

The words "Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, section 506 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C. 1156)" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "the Commonwealth of" are omitted as unnecessary and for consistency in the revised title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12120, Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 100–710, title I, §104(a)(4), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4750; Pub. L. 108–293, title IV, §401, Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1042; Pub. L. 109–241, title III, §308, July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 528, originally derived from section 65t of former Title 46, Shipping, related to reports, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–304. See section 12139 of this title.
§ 3286.7 Consumer information. ( a ) *Manufacturer's consumer manual.* In each consumer manual provided by a manufacturer as required in § 3282.207 of this chapter, the manufacturer must include a recommendation that any home that has been reinstalled after its original installation should be inspected after it is set up, in order to assure that it has not been damaged and is properly installed.
( b ) *Retailer disclosures before sale or lease.* Prior to execution of the sales contract to purchase or agreement to lease a manufactured home, the retailer must provide the purchaser or lessee with a consumer disclosure. This disclosure must be in a document separate from the sales or lease agreement. The disclosure must include the following information, as applicable: ( 1 ) When the installation of the home is in a state that administers its own qualifying installation program, the consumer disclosure must clearly state that the home will be required to comply with all state requirements for the installation of the home;
( 2 ) When the installation of the home is in a state that does not administer its own qualifying installation program, the consumer disclosure must clearly state that the home will be required to comply with federal requirements, including installation in accordance with federal installation standards set forth in 24 CFR part 3285 and certification by a licensed installer of installation work, regardless of whether the work is performed by the homeowner or anyone else, and when certification includes inspection by an appropriate person;
( 3 ) For all homes, the home may also be required to comply with additional state and local requirements for its installation;
( 4 ) For all homes, additional information about the requirements disclosed under paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4) of this section is available from the retailer and, in the case of the federal requirements, is available in part 3286 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations and from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development;
( 5 ) For all homes, compliance with any additional federal, state, and local requirements, including a requirement for inspection of the installation of the home, may involve additional costs to the purchaser or lessee; and
( 6 ) For all homes, a recommendation that any home that has been reinstalled after its original installation should be professionally inspected after it is set up, in order to assure that it has not been damaged in transit and is properly installed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3014 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3014

  To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, regarding leasing of the Moses 
                              Allotments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2005

  Mr. Hastings of Washington introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, regarding leasing of the Moses 
                              Allotments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT RELATED TO MOSES ALLOTMENTS.

    The first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 (69 Stat. 539; 25 
U.S.C. 415), is amended by striking ``and the lands comprising the 
Moses Allotment Numbered 10, Chelan County, Washington,'' and inserting 
the following: ``and the lands comprising the Moses Allotment Numbered 
8 and the Moses Allotment Numbered 10, Chelan County, Washington''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3


  Exhibit 10.3

  EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT

  	This Executive Employment Agreement Amendment (the “Amendment”) is made as of November 7, 2022, by and among Precision BioSciences, Inc. (the “Company”) and the individual whose name appears on the signature page hereto (the “Executive”).  Except as set forth in this Amendment, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement (as defined below).

  WITNESSETH

  	WHEREAS, the Executive previously entered into an executive employment agreement with the Company (the “Employment Agreement”); and

  	WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company each desire to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

  	NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Company hereby agree to the following:

  1.Amendment to the Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following to the definition of “Good Reason” set forth in Section 4.4:


  “a material, adverse change in Executive’s title, authority, duties, or responsibilities (other than temporarily while the Executive is physically or mentally incapacitated or as required by applicable law), provided that this shall not apply following an acquisition of or merger by the Company if Executive is provided with similar title, responsibilities, duties and authority in a larger organization, but only with respect to the business of the Company and its subsidiaries;”

  2.No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect according to its terms.


  3.Entire Agreement. This Amendment, together with the Employment Agreement (to the extent not amended hereby), represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede any and all previous contracts, arrangements or understandings between the parties.


  [signature page follows]

   

   

   

   

  |

  

   

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Employee have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

  PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC.

   

   

  By: /s/ Michael Amoroso

  Name: Michael Amoroso

  Title: Chief Executive Officer

   

   

  EXECUTIVE

   

   

  /s/ Alan List

  Alan List

   

   

   

   

   

  |
### §1112. Annual reports: type for reports of executive officers

The annual reports of executive officers shall be printed in the same type and form as the report of the head of the department which it accompanies, unless otherwise ordered by the Joint Committee on Printing.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1263.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §222 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §91, 28 Stat. 623).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-

OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronavan Mohling, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                                       
| |  | --------------------------------------
| |  | /S/ Ronavan Mohling                   
| |  | Ronavan Mohling                       
| |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and
| |  | Chief Executive Officer               
| |  | February 11, 2005
#### Morris Freedman et al., Doing Business as Freedman Bros., Appellants, v. Norddeutscher Lloyd (United States Navigation Co., Agents), Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ. [22 Misc 2d 397.]
##### 






EXHIBIT 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF POLYPORE, INC.


|                                                |  |                                                       
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                                               
|Name of Subsidiary                              |  | State or jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                               
|Celgard K.K                                     |  | Japan                                                 
|Celgard, LLC                                    |  | Delaware                                              
|Daramic (Shanghai) Battery Separators Co., Ltd. |  | China                                                 
|Daramic (Thailand) Limited                      |  | Thailand                                              
|Daramic Asia, Inc.                              |  | Delaware                                              
|Daramic Group International, Inc.               |  | U.S. Virgin Islands                                   
|Daramic Holding S.A.                            |  | France                                                
|Daramic International, Inc.                     |  | Delaware                                              
|Daramic S.A.                                    |  | France                                                
|Daramic S.r.l                                   |  | Italy                                                 
|Daramic Separadores de Baterias Ltda.           |  | Brazil                                                
|Daramic, LLC                                    |  | Delaware                                              
|Membrana GmbH                                   |  | Germany                                               
|Polypore Acquisition GmbH                       |  | Germany                                               
|Polypore B.V                                    |  | Netherlands                                           
|Polypore C.V.                                   |  | Netherlands                                           
|Separatorenerzeugung GmbH                       |  | Austria                                               
|Separatorenerzeugung Holding GmbH               |  | Austria                                               
|
CV 09-2368 JCS 1

THOMAS N. STEWART, III - #88128

ATTORNEY AT LAW

369 BLUE OAK LANE, 2nd FLOOR

CLAYTON, CA 94517

TELEPHONE (925) 672-8452

TELEFAX (925) 673-1729

Attorneys for Michael Fernandes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL FERNANDES, Case No. CV 09-2368 JCS

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN A. GENTILE, AJRUYE

GENTILE, NANCY NAKAI, 

KEIKO AKASHI,

Defendants.

__________________________________/ 

 

The parties hereto stipulate as follows:

The parties have reached a full and final settlement of all issues in this action. A

Settlement Agreement between the parties has been fully executed. 

Some parts of the Settlement Agreement are to be performed in the future. The parties

shall comply with their Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as

if fully set forth. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction for 18 months from the

date hereof in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement under the authority of

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

Case 3:09-cv-02368-JCS Document 8 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02368-JCS Document7 Filed10/03/09 Page1 of 2
CV 09-2368 JCS 2

Although the parties are hereby dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that

the Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to

enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP

41(a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for

18 months after the date hereof.

Date: October 1, 2009 Date: October 3, 2009

S/Lawrence E. Smith, S/Thomas N. Stewart, III, 

Attorney for Defendants Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: ________________________________

 Judge/Magistrate

Case 3:09-cv-02368-JCS Document 8 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02368-JCS Document7 Filed10/03/09 Page2 of 2
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                             |            |                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated                this 27th  day                of June, 2007. | By:   | /s/                Liang Zhang                   Liang                Zhang Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                                             |            |

----
#### § 1003.608 Debarment and suspension.

The requirements in 2 CFR part 2424 are applicable. ICDBG funds cannot be provided to excluded or disqualified persons.

[72 FR 73497, Dec. 27, 2007]
SONJA SMITH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 15 56

____________ _________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Washington County.

Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

Sonja Smith, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant

Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, R AY, and KELSEY, J J

., CONCUR.
### **CHAPTER 511—GENERAL**

Sec.
51101.
Policy.
51102.
Definitions.
51103.
General authority of Secretary of Transportation.
51104.
General authority of Secretary of the Navy.
**Exhibit 4.10****SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT**Party A: Shanghai Run An Lian Information Consultancy Company LimitedParty B: Qianjin Network Information Technology (Shanghai) Company LimitedBased on the Cooperation Agreement (“Shanghai Run An Lian Information Consultancy Company Limitedand Qianjin Network Information Technology (Shanghai) Company Limited Cooperation Agreement”) madeand entered into by Party A and Party B on May 3, 2004, due to business development needs, Party Aand Party B enter into the following supplemental provisions:1. In the Cooperation Agreement, “direct operating cost” shall indicate: communication cost +hardware cost. When revenue — (cost + expense) is a positive number, Party B shall not payany expense to Party A.2. Because of rapid business development, there is no longer a maximum limit for service feespaid by Party B to Party A.This supplemental agreement is in duplicate and shall have the same legal effect as the originalagreement. It becomes effective on April 1, 2007.Party A: Shanghai Run An Lian Information Consultancy Company Limited
§ 81.54 Review of disapproval. ( a ) *Programs disapproved as unauthorized.* ( 1 ) Where the Secretary disapproves a program request on the grounds that the new program is not authorized, as defined in § 81.53(d) or (e), the GSE may, within 30 days of the date of receipt of the decision on disapproval, request an opportunity to review and supplement the administrative record for the decision, in accordance with paragraphs (a) (2) and (3) of this section.
( 2 ) *Supplementing in writing.* A GSE supplementing the record in writing must submit written materials within 30 days after the date of receipt of the decision on disapproval, but no later than the date of a meeting, if requested, under paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( 3 ) *Meeting.* Within 10 days of the date of receipt of the decision of disapproval, the GSE may request a meeting. If the request for the meeting is timely, the Secretary shall arrange such a meeting, which shall be conducted by the Secretary or the Secretary's designee within 10 working days after receipt of the request. The GSE may be represented by counsel and may submit relevant written materials to supplement the record.
( 4 ) *Determination.* The Secretary shall: ( i ) In writing and within 10 days after submission of any materials under paragraph (a)(2) of this section or the conclusion of any meeting under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, whichever is later, withdraw, modify, or affirm the program disapproval; and
( ii ) Provide the GSE with that decision.
( b ) *Programs disapproved under public interest determination.* When a program request is disapproved because the Secretary determines that the program is not in the public interest or the Director makes the determination in 12 U.S.C. 4542(b)(2)(B), the Secretary shall provide the GSE with notice of, and opportunity for, a hearing on the record regarding such disapproval. A request for a hearing must be submitted by a GSE within 30 days of the Secretary's submission of a report under § 81.53(g) disapproving a program request or the provision of the notice under this paragraph (b), whichever is later. The procedures for such hearings are provided in subpart G of this part.
#### § 8.2 Applicability.

This part applies to all applicants for, and recipients of, HUD assistance in the operation of programs or activities receiving such assistance.

[53 FR 20233, June 2, 1988, as amended at 83 FR 26361, June 7, 2018]
### §914. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 18, 1874, ch. 305, 18 Stat. 80, provided for issuance of patents for lands granted State of Oregon prior to June 18, 1874, upon certificate of Governor that wagon roads, in aid of which lands were granted, had been built.
STIPULATION REGARDING STATUS CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 09-01982 MHP 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WORLDS.COM INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NCSOFT CORP., 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. C 09-01982 MHP 

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 

ADJOURNMENT OF MARCH 1 

STATUS CONFERENCE 

Judge: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel 

 Courtroom 15, 18th Floor 

The Court has scheduled a Status Conference in this action for March 1, 2010 

(Docket Entry 63). The Parties desire a three-week adjournment of that date, and jointly 

state and stipulate as follows: 

1. The parties have been engaged in settlement discussions and have agreed on 

the amount of a monetary payment to settle the matter, subject to reaching agreement on 

additional material terms and provisions. 

2. The parties believe that a three-week adjournment of the March 1, 2010 

Status Conference would allow the parties time to enter into a final settlement agreement 

and stipulate to the dismissal of this action, and thereby obviate the need for a further 

Status Conference. 

3. The March 1, 2010 Status Conference is rescheduled for March 22, 2010 at 

03:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco, or a subsequent date that is 

convenient for the Court. 

 

// 

//

Case 3:09-cv-01982-MHP Document 73 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION REGARDING STATUS CONFERENCE 

Case No. C 09-01982 MHP 

2

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Dated: February 25, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

David Commins 

COMMINS & KNUDSEN, P.C. 

400 Montgomery St., Suite 200 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Tel: 415.391.6490 

Fax: 415.391.6493 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Worlds.com Inc. 

Stephen F. Roth (pro hac vice) 

Russell W. Faegenburg (pro hac vice) 

Keir J. LoIacono (pro hac vice) 

LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, 

 KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP

600 South Avenue West 

Westfield, NJ 07090 

Tel: 908.654.5000 

Fax: 908.654.7866 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Worlds.com Inc. 

By: /s/ Russell W. Faegenburg .

Gabrielle E. Higgins (CSB # 163179)

ROPES & GRAY 

1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor 

East Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Tel: 650.617.4015 

Fax: 650.566.4131 

Attorneys for Defendant NCsoft Corp.

Jesse J. Jenner (pro hac vice) 

Gene W. Lee (pro hac vice) 

David S. Chun (pro hac vice) 

Brian P. Biddinger (CSB # 224604) 

Hanyong Lee (pro hac vice) 

ROPES & GRAY 

1211 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036-8704 

Tel: 212.596.9000 

Fax: 212.596.9090 

Attorneys for Defendant NCsoft Corp.

By: /s/ David S. Chun .

2/26/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-01982-MHP Document 73 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 2