alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3209 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3209

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add nasopharyngeal cancer to 
    the statutorily prescribed presumptive diseases associated with 
      exposure to Agent Orange during military service in Vietnam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

 Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to add nasopharyngeal cancer to 
    the statutorily prescribed presumptive diseases associated with 
      exposure to Agent Orange during military service in Vietnam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER TO THE STATUTORILY 
              PRESCRIBED PRESUMPTIVE DISEASES ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE 
              TO AGENT ORANGE DURING MILITARY SERVICE IN VIETNAM.

    Section 1116(a)(2)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by inserting ``or nasopharyngeal cancer'' after ``or trachea)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3286.805 Procedures for identification as qualified installation program. ( a ) *Submission of certification.* ( 1 ) A state seeking identification as having a qualified installation program must submit a completed State Installation Program Certification form to the Secretary for review and acceptance and indicate if the installation program will be part of its approved state plan in accordance with part 3282 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A state must include a qualified installation program as part of any state plan application submitted for approval under § 3282.302 of this chapter, if the state does not have a fully or conditionally approved state plan in effect at the time of submission of the state plan application. In all other cases, a qualified installation program is permitted, but is not required, to be submitted as a part of a state plan approved in accordance with § 3282.305 of this chapter.
( b ) *HUD review and action.* ( 1 ) The Secretary will review the State Installation Program Certification form submitted by a state and may request that the state submit additional information as necessary. Unless the Secretary has contacted the state for additional information or has conditionally accepted or rejected the state installation program, the state installation program will be considered to have been accepted by the Secretary as a fully qualifying installation program as of the earlier of: ( i ) Ninety days after the Secretary receives the state's completed State Installation Program Certification form; or
( ii ) The date that the Secretary issues notification to the state of its full acceptance.
( 2 ) A notice of full or conditional acceptance will include the effective date of acceptance.
( c ) *Rejection of state installation program.* ( 1 ) If the Secretary intends to reject a state's installation program, the Secretary will provide to the state an explanation of what is necessary to obtain full or conditional acceptance. The state will be given 90 days from the date the Secretary provides such explanation to submit a revised State Installation Program Certification form.
( 2 ) If the Secretary decides that any revised State Installation Program Certification form is inadequate, or if the state fails to submit a revised form within the 90-day period or otherwise indicates that it does not intend to change its form, the Secretary will notify the state that its installation program is not accepted.
( 3 ) A state whose State Installation Program Certification form is rejected has a right to a presentation of views on the rejection using the procedures set forth under subpart D of part 3282 of this chapter. The state's request for a presentation of views must be submitted to the Secretary within 60 days after the Secretary has provided notification that the state's installation program has been rejected.
### §329. Issue of patent on final proof; citizenship requirement as to patentee; limit as to amount of holding

At any time after filing the declaration, and within the period of four years thereafter, upon making satisfactory proof to the officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior of the reclamation and cultivation of said land to the extent and cost and in the manner aforesaid, and substantially in accordance with the plans herein provided for, and that he or she is a citizen of the United States, and upon payment to such officer of the additional sum of $1 per acre for said land, a patent shall issue therefor to the applicant or his assigns; but no person or association of persons shall hold by assignment or otherwise prior to the issue of patent, more than three hundred and twenty acres of such arid or desert lands, but this section shall not apply to entries made or initiated prior to March 3, 1891: Provided, however, That additional proofs may be required at any time within the period prescribed by law, and that the claims or entries made under sections 321 to 323, 325, and 327 to 329 of this title shall be subject to contest, as provided by the law, relating to homestead cases, for illegal inception, abandonment, or failure to comply with the requirements of law, and upon satisfactory proof thereof shall be canceled, and the lands, and moneys paid therefor, shall be forfeited to the United States.

(Mar. 3, 1877, ch. 107, §7, as added Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §2, 26 Stat. 1097; amended Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Five-Year Period

The period of four years prescribed by this section was extended to five years as to pending entries where the time for final proof had not expired prior to Jan. 1, 1894, by act Aug. 4, 1894, ch. 208, 28 Stat. 226.

#### Section as Unaffected by Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Officer designated by the Secretary of the Interior" substituted for "register" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, which abolished all registers of district land offices and transferred functions of register of district land offices to Secretary of the Interior. See section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3, 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. Previously, references to register and receiver changed to register by acts Mar. 3, 1925, and Oct. 28, 1921, which consolidated offices of register and receiver and provided for a single officer to be known as register.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Baxter, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 822]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 28, 2005 *(People v Baxter,*15 AD3d 671 [2005]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered July 10, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Mastro and Santucci, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

SCHEDULE FOR CLOSING

ARGUMENTS

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 678 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The court hereby sets the following schedule for closing

arguments:

 June 16, 2010

10:00 AM - 11:30 AM Plaintiffs

11:30 AM - 11:45 AM City and County of San Francisco

11:45 AM - 12:00 PM Governor, Attorney General and

county defendants

12:00 PM - 1:00 PM Lunch

1:00 PM - 3:15 PM Proponents

3:15 PM - 3:45 PM Plaintiffs’ rebuttal

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 678 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Dime Savings Bank of New York, Respondent, v Mertylin Carroll, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 3, 1976, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a decision. Two orders of the same court, dated November 26, 1976 and November 10, 1977, respectively, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T23:12:19-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
**Exhibit 10.2**

AMENDMENT 

TO THE 

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 

BY AND BETWEEN 

JER INVESTORS TRUST INC. 

and 

JER COMMERCIAL DEBT ADVISORS, LLC 

This AMENDMENT No. 1 to the ManagementAgreement, dated as of June 4, 2004 (the “Management Agreement”), by and between JER Investors Trust Inc., a Maryland Corporation (the “Company), and JER Commercial Debt Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the“Manager”), is made as of this 24th day of January 2006, between the Company and the Manager. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Management Agreement. 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, theCompany and the Manager are parties to the Management Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager desire to amend the ManagementAgreement in the manner and as more fully set forth herein; and 

WHEREAS, as permitted by Section 17(d) of the Management Agreement,the parties hereto have consented to amending the Management Agreement in the manner and as more fully set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the mutual promise and agreements herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1. Amendment to Section 1(a). The definition of “Incentive Fee” is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following definition: 

*“Incentive Fee”*: an incentive management fee payable each fiscal quarter in an amount, not less than zero, equal to theproduct of: (i) 25% of the dollar amount by which (a) Funds From Operations of the Company (before Incentive Fee but after taking into account the Base Management Fee) for such quarter per share of Common Stock (based on the weightedaverage number of shares outstanding for such quarter) exceed (b) an amount equal to (1) the weighted average of the price per share of Common Stock issued in the Initial Private Offering and the prices per share of Common Stock in anysubsequent offerings by the Company multiplied by (2) the greater of (A) 2.25% and (B) .875% plus one fourth of the Ten-Year U.S. Treasury Rate for such quarter, multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of shares of CommonStock outstanding during such quarter. 

*2*. Ratification: Except as modified pursuant to this Amendment, the Management Agreement isratified and confirmed in all respects. 

[rest of page intentionally left blank] 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the ManagementAgreement effective as of the date first above written. 

 
JER INVESTORS TRUST INC.By: 
/s/ Gene McQuown
 
Name: Gene McQuown

Title:   President

 
JER COMMERCIAL DEBT ADVISORS, LLCBy: 
/s/ Daniel T. Ward
 
Name: Daniel T. Ward

Title:   Senior Managing Director
### §§403, 404. Repealed. June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, §206(c), 61 Stat. 208

Section 403, acts May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §36, 48 Stat. 49; June 16, 1933, ch. 101, §19, 48 Stat. 308; June 19, 1934, ch. 653, §11, 48 Stat. 1110; June 27, 1934, ch. 851, 48 Stat. 1269, related to refinancing agricultural improvement districts.

Section 404, act May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §37, 48 Stat. 50, related to advances by the former Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
### §1103. Certificate of necessity; estimate of cost

When a department, the Supreme Court, or the Library of Congress requires printing or binding to be done, it shall certify that it is necessary for the public service. The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall then furnish an estimate of cost by principal items, after which requisitions may be made upon him for the printing or binding by the head of the department, the Clerk of the Supreme Court, or the Librarian of Congress, respectively. The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall place the cost to the debit of the department in its annual appropriation for printing and binding.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1261; Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §159, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 48; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §117 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §93, 28 Stat. 623; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §32(a), 62 Stat. 991; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, sec. 127, 63 Stat. 107).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in two places.

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 struck out the Court of Claims from the enumeration of entities for which printing or binding may be done for the public service and struck out the chief judge of the Court of Claims from the enumeration of officials who make requisitions upon the Public Printer for printing or binding.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 327 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 327

 To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts 
   affecting land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

 Mr. Grijalva (for himself and Mr. Hayworth) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow binding arbitration clauses to be included in all contracts 
   affecting land within the Gila River Indian Community Reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BINDING ARBITRATION FOR GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 
              RESERVATION CONTRACTS.

    (a) Amendments.--Subsection (f) of the first section of the Act of 
August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(f)), is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``Any lease'' and all that follows 
                through ``affecting land'' and inserting ``Any 
                contract, including a lease, affecting land''; and
                    (B) by striking ``such lease or contract'' and 
                inserting ``such contract''; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Such leases or 
        contracts entered into pursuant to such Acts'' and inserting 
        ``Such contracts''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in Public Law 107-159 (116 Stat. 122).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26881]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 8, 2020 / 
Notices

[[Page 78988]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service


Designation of Amarillo Grain Exchange, Inc. To provide Class X 
or Class Y Weighing Services

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is announcing the 
designation of Amarillo Grain Exchange, Inc. (Amarillo) to provide 
Class X or Class Y weighing services under the United States Grain 
Standards Act (USGSA), as amended.

DATES: Effective July 1, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Austyn Hughes, (816) 891-0456 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c6a6b657f7d6d6f686c595f484d024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95d3d2dcc6c4d4d6d1d5e0e6f1f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the December 12, 2016, Federal Register 
(81 FR 89428), AMS announced the designation of Amarillo to provide 
official services under the USGSA, effective October 1, 2016, to 
September 30, 2021. Subsequently, Amarillo asked AMS to amend their 
designation to include official weighing services. The USGSA authorizes 
the Secretary to designate authority to perform official weighing to an 
agency providing official inspection services within a specified 
geographic area, if such agency is qualified under 7 U.S.C. 79. Under 7 
U.S.C. 79(a), AMS evaluated information regarding the designation 
criteria in section 7 U.S.C. 79 and determined that Amarillo is 
qualified to provide official weighing services in their currently 
assigned geographic area. Therefore, Amarillo's designation is amended 
to include Class X or Class Y weighing within their assigned geographic 
area, effective July 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Interested persons 
may obtain official services by contacting Amarillo at (806) 372-8511.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87k.

Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-26881 Filed 12-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 401.301 Partnership arrangements. If the PAE is in a partnership, the PRA must specify the following: ( a ) The responsibilities of each partner regarding the Restructuring Plan;
( b ) The resources each partner will provide to accomplish its designated responsibilities; and
( c ) All compensation to each partner, whether direct or indirect.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Craig L. Montanaro, President and Chief Executive Officer and Eric B. Heyer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Craig L. MontanaroCraig L. Montanaro

President and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Eric B. HeyerEric B. Heyer

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer








September 26, 2011