EXHIBIT 99


Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995


     The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") provides
a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to
provide prospective information about their companies, so long as those
statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful
cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those discussed in the statement. Home City
Financial Corporation ("HCFC") desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor"
provisions of the Act.  Certain information, particularly information
regarding future economic performance and finances and plans and objectives of
management, contained or incorporated by reference in HCFC's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the three-months ended March 31, 2000, is forward-looking.
In some cases, information regarding certain important factors that could
cause actual results of operations or outcomes of other events to differ
materially from any such forward-looking statement appear together with such
statement.  In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to other risks
and uncertainties affecting the financial institutions industry, including,
but not limited to, the following:

Interest Rate Risk

     HCFC's operating results are dependent to a significant degree on its net
interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans,
investments and other interest-earning assets and interest expense on
deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities.  The interest
income and interest expense of HCFC change as the interest rates on
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities change.  Interest
rates may change because of general economic conditions, the policies of
various regulatory authorities and other factors beyond HCFC's control.  In a
rising interest rate environment, loans tend to prepay slowly and new loans at
higher rates increase slowly, while interest paid on deposits increases
rapidly because the terms to maturity of deposits tend to be shorter than the
terms to maturity or prepayment of loans.  Such differences in the adjustment
of interest rates on assets and liabilities may negatively affect HCFC's
income.

Possible Inadequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses

     HCFC maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon a number of
relevant factors, including, but not limited to, trends in the level of
nonperforming assets and classified loans, current and anticipated economic
conditions in the primary lending area, past loss experience, possible losses
arising from specific problem loans and changes in the composition of the loan
portfolio.  While the Board of Directors of HCFC believes that it uses the
best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses,
unforeseen market conditions could result in material adjustments, and net
earnings could be significantly adversely affected if circumstances differ
substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination.

     Loans not secured by one- to four-family residential real estate are
generally considered to involve greater risk of loss than loans secured by
one- to four-family residential real estate due, in part, to the effects of
general economic conditions.  The repayment of multifamily residential and
nonresidential real estate loans generally depends upon the cash flow from the
operation of the property, which may be negatively affected by national and
local economic conditions.  Construction loans may also be negatively affected
by such economic conditions, particularly loans made to developers who do not
have a buyer for a property before the loan is made.  The risk of default on
consumer loans increases during periods of recession, high unemployment and
other adverse economic conditions.  When consumers have trouble paying their
bills, they are more likely to pay mortgage loans than consumer loans.  In
addition, the collateral securing such loans, if any, may decrease in value
more rapidly than the outstanding balance of the loan.



Competition

Home City Federal Savings Bank of Springfield ("Home City") competes for
deposits with other savings associations, commercial banks and credit unions
and issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money
market mutual funds.  The primary factors in competing for deposits are
interest rates and convenience of office location.  In making loans, Home City
competes with other savings associations, commercial banks, consumer finance
companies, credit unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other
lenders.  Competition is affected by, among other things, the general
availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current
interest rate levels and other factors which are not readily predictable.  The
size of financial institutions competing with Home City is likely to increase
as a result of changes in statutes and regulations eliminating various
restrictions on interstate and inter-industry branching and acquisitions.
Such increased competition may have an adverse effect upon Home City.

Legislation and Regulation that may Adversely Affect HCFC's Earnings

     Home City is subject to extensive regulation by the Office of Thrift
Supervision (the "OTS") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
"FDIC") and is periodically examined by such regulatory agencies to test
compliance with various regulatory requirements.  As a savings and loan
holding company, HCFC is also subject to regulation and examination by the
OTS.  Such supervision and regulation of HCFC and Home City are intended
primarily for the protection of depositors and not for the maximization of
shareholder value and may affect the ability of the company to engage in
various business activities.  The assessments, filing fees and other costs
associated with reports, examinations and other regulatory matters are
significant and may have an adverse effect on HCFC's net earnings.

     The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates for
deposit insurance of members of the Bank Insurance fund (the "BIF") and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF").  The FDIC has established a
risk-based assessment system for both SAIF and BIF members.  Under such
system, assessments may vary depending on the risk the institution poses to
its deposit insurance fund. Such risk level is determined by reference to the
institution's capital level and the FDIC's level of supervisory concern about
the institution.