alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-48-2020]

On July 27, 2020, ProAmpac Holdings, Inc., submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 201D, in Westfield, Massachusetts.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (85 FR 47166, August 4, 2020). On November 24, 2020, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: November 24, 2020.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26498 Filed 11-30-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
§ 578.85 Timeliness standards. ( a ) *In general.* Recipients must initiate approved activities and projects promptly.
( b ) *Construction activities.* Recipients of funds for rehabilitation or new construction must meet the following standards: ( 1 ) Construction activities must begin within 9 months of the later of signing of the grant agreement or of signing an addendum to the grant agreement authorizing use of grant funds for the project.
( 2 ) Construction activities must be completed within 24 months of signing the grant agreement.
( 3 ) Activities that cannot begin until after construction activities are completed must begin within 3 months of the date that construction activities are completed.
( c ) *Distribution.* A recipient that receives funds through this part must: ( 1 ) Distribute the funds to subrecipients (in advance of expenditures by the subrecipients);
( 2 ) Distribute the appropriate portion of the funds to a subrecipient no later than 45 days after receiving an approvable request for such distribution from the subrecipient; and
( 3 ) Draw down funds at least once per quarter of the program year, after eligible activities commence.
#### SCHREIBER v. ASH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 18, 1903.)

1. Contract or Employment—Breach—Pleading—General Denial.

In an action for breach of a contract of employment for a definite term, evidence by the defendant of facts justifying a dismissal of the employs before the expiration of the term is inadmissible under a general denial.

¶ 1. See Master and Servant, vol. 34, Cent. Dig. § 46.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eleventh District.

*947Action by David Schreiber against Magnus Ash. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before FREEDMAN, P. J., and BISCHOFF and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Sol. De Young, for appellant.

Steuer & Hoffman (Max D. Steuer, of counsel), for respondent

BLANCHARD, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the breach of a contract of employment. The pleadings were oral. The plaintiff alleged “damages for breach of contract,” to which the defendant interposed a general denial, and demanded a bill of particulars. In the bill of particulars which the plaintiff furnished pursuant to the demand he set forth that the contract was in writing, that he performed all its terms and conditions, and that he was discharged before its expiration. He was to commence June 16, 1902, and continue until January 1, 1903. The plaintiff was discharged by the defendant October 26, 1902. The case came on for trial before a justice without a jury, a verdict rendered for defendant, and from that judgment the plaintiff appeals.

All that the plaintiff was called upon to prove in order to sustain his cause of action was the making of the contract and his discharge before it had expired. The making of the contract and the discharge were therefore the only material averments alleged, and were the only facts that the plaintiff was compelled to prove to establish his cause of action. The general denial of the defendant controverted only those material allegations, which were the making of the contract and its breach. Linton v. N. F. Co., 124 N. Y. 533, 27 N. E. 406. This case distinctly holds that when an employer discharges a servant “while engaged in the performance of the contract, and before his term of service had expired, the burden is cast upon the employer of proving, and hence alleging facts in justification of, the dismissal.” The learned trial court in the case at bar allowed defendant to prove facts of justification of the dismissal, and, under his general denial, we think it was error calling for a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment must accordingly be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
### §50102. Survey of merchant marine

(a) In General.—The Secretary of Transportation shall survey the merchant marine of the United States to determine whether replacements and additions are required to carry out the objectives and policy of section 50101 of this title. The Secretary shall study, perfect, and adopt a long-range program for replacements and additions that will result, as soon as practicable, in—

(1) an adequate and well-balanced merchant fleet, including vessels of all types, that will provide shipping service essential for maintaining the flow of foreign commerce by vessels designed to be readily and quickly convertible into transport and supply vessels in a time of national emergency;

(2) ownership and operation of the fleet by citizens of the United States insofar as practicable;

(3) vessels designed to afford the best and most complete protection for passengers and crew against fire and all marine perils; and

(4) an efficient capacity for building and repairing vessels in the United States with an adequate number of skilled personnel to provide an adequate mobilization base.

(b) Cooperation With Secretary of Navy.—In carrying out subsection (a)(1), the Secretary of Transportation shall cooperate closely with the Secretary of the Navy as to national defense requirements.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §8(b), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1557.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50102 | 46 App.:1120. | June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §210, 49 Stat. 1989; Pub. L. 91–469, §§3, 35(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1018, 1035; Pub.L. 97–31, §12(67) (related to §210), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 159. |

Section
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.954 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD building product standard and certification program for construction adhesives for wood floor systems. ( a ) *Applicable standards.* ( 1 ) All construction adhesives for field glued wood floor systems shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard: D 3498-93 Standard Specification for Adhesives for Field-Gluing Plywood to Lumber Framing for Floor Systems except that the mold and bacteria resistance tests shall not be included.
( 2 ) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51, and is available from the American Society for Testing & Materials Inc., 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA. 19428.
( b ) *Labeling.* Under the procedures set forth in § 200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with the applicable standard are required to be on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. Each container shall be marked as being in compliance with UM 60a. The label shall also include the manufacturer's name, plant location, and shelf life.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality assurance.* Under the procedures set forth in § 200.935(d)(8) concerning periodic tests and quality assurance inspections, the frequency of testing for a product shall be described in the specific building product certification program. In the case of construction adhesives for field glued wood floor systems, testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) At least every six months, the administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility to select a sample for testing in a laboratory approved by the administrator.
( 2 ) The administrator shall also review the quality assurance procedures twice a year to assure that they are being followed by the manufacturer.
[63 FR 5424, Feb. 2, 1998]
#### § 891.115 Notice of funding availability.

Following an allocation of authority under § 891.110, HUD shall publish a separate Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the Section 202 Program of Supportive Housing for the Elderly and for the Section 811 Program of Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities in the Federal Register. The NOFAs will contain specific information on how and when to apply for the available capital advance authority, the contents of the application, and the selection process.
§ 4.38 Administrative remedies. ( a ) If the Department receives or obtains information providing a reasonable basis to believe that a violation of Section 103 has occurred, the Department may impose a sanction, as determined to be appropriate, upon an applicant for or a recipient of assistance who has received covered selection information.
( b ) In determining whether a sanction is appropriate and if so which sanction or sanctions should be sought, the Secretary shall give consideration to the applicant's conduct with respect to the violation. In so doing, the Secretary shall consider the factors listed at § 4.36(d), as well as any history of prior violations in any HUD program, the benefits received or expected, deterrence of future violations and the extent of any complicity in the violation.
( c ) The Secretary may impose a sanction authorized by this section whether or not the Ethics Law Division refers a case under 24 CFR part 30, and whether or not a civil money penalty is imposed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ JAMES A. CALDERJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
### §1302. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are to transfer the interest of the United States in the common stock of the Corporation to the private sector in a manner that provides for the long-term viability of the Corporation, provides for the continuation by the Corporation of its rail service in the Northeast and Midwest, provides for the protection of the public interest in a sound rail transportation system, and, to the extent not inconsistent with such purposes, secures the maximum proceeds to the United States.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, §4003, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1893.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED (Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

** **

JackB. Buchold certifies as follows:

 

3.               I am the Chief FinancialOfficer of The Bank Holdings.

 

4.               The Form 10-Q of TheBank Holdings for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofThe Bank Holdings.

 

 
| Date:  | November 10,  2008 |                     | /s/ Jack B. Buchold |
|--------|-------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------|
|   |                    | THE  BANK HOLDINGS       |
|   |                    | Jack  B. Buchold         |
|   |                    | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
#### HUNTLEY, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by George W. Hunt ley, as administrator, etc., against the New York ■Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in  Registration  Statements No.
2-70979, No. 33-26847 and No.  333-25783 of Navistar  International  Corporation
on Form S-8 of our report  dated May 14, 1999  appearing  in this Annual  Report
on   Form 11-K  of  the   Navistar  International  Transportation  Corp.  401(k)
Retirement  Savings  Plan for the year ended December 31, 1998.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
June 2, 1999
Chicago, Illinois
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JER Investors Trust Inc. (the
Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                           |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/ JOSEPH E. ROBERT, JR.
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  | Name:                     |  | Joseph E. Robert, Jr.                            
|                      |  | Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
§ 291.550 Second mortgage. ( a ) *General.* The second mortgage is a mortgage and note, payable to HUD, on the home purchased through the GNND Sales Program in the amount of the difference between the list price of the home and the discounted selling price.
( b ) *Second mortgage term.* The term of the second mortgage is equal to the owner-occupancy term (36 months) plus 30, 90, or 180 days, as provided in § 291.540(b). The amount of the second mortgage will be reduced by 1/36th on the last day of each month of occupancy following the occupancy start date. At the end of the 36th month of occupancy, the amount of the second mortgage will be zero.
( c ) *Sale or vacancy of home.* If the law enforcement officer, teacher, or firefighter/emergency medical technician sells his/her home or stops living in the home as his/her sole residence prior to the expiration of the owner-occupancy term, he/she will owe HUD the amount due on the second mortgage as of the date the property is either sold or vacated.
Document

Exhibit 10.1





    November 1, 2022


By Hand


[Name of Executive
Title of Executive]1
2 W. Washington St. Suite 700 
Greenville, South Carolina 29601


    Re:  Termination of Change in Control Severance Agreement


Dear [Name of Executive]:


United Community Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) is undergoing a review of its executive compensation arrangements. In connection therewith, the Company desires to terminate the United Community Banks, Inc. Change in Control Severance Agreement, dated [•]2 (the “CIC Agreement”) by and between you and the Company.  Accordingly, pursuant to Section 1 of the CIC Agreement, you and the Company agree that the CIC Agreement shall be terminated effective as of November 1, 2022.  You acknowledge and further agree that the termination of the CIC Agreement does not constitute a termination of your employment or serve as the basis for a claim for termination by you for “good reason” (or any similar term) under any employment or compensation arrangement with the Company, including the CIC Agreement, any equity award (including any restricted stock unit award, performance-based restricted stock award or stock option award) or any other employment or compensation arrangement.


Please read this letter agreement carefully.  If you are in agreement with the terms of this letter agreement, please then sign and return this letter agreement to [•].


Sincerely,






[Melinda Davis Lux
                            Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
 Corporate Secretary]3


Executive Acceptance


I agree to the termination of the CIC Agreement and the other terms of this letter agreement.




_________________________
[Name of Executive]

1 H. Lynn Harton, President & Chief Executive Officer;  Jefferson L. Harralson, Chief Financial Officer;  Richard W. Bradshaw, Executive Vice President & Chief Banking Officer;  Robert A. Edwards, Executive Vice President & Chief Risk Officer;  Melinda Davis Lux, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary;  Mark A. Terry, Chief Information Officer; and Holly N. Berry, Chief Human Resources Officer
2 Insert date of CIC Agreement
3 Signature by H. Lynn Harton for letter to Melinda Davis Lux
### §714. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 93–236, title II, §204, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 993, directed the Secretary, within 30 days after Jan. 2, 1974, to prepare a report, with recommendations, with respect to the geographic zones within the region in which said service should be provided, to submit the report to the Office, the Association, the Governor, and the public utilities commission of each State studied in the report and to local governments, consumer organizations, environmental groups, the public, and to Congress, and to publish the report in the Federal Register.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Delaware-Maryland-Virginia Peninsula Rail Study; Report to Congress

Pub. L. 94–555, title III, §302, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2631, directed Interstate Commerce Commission to submit a report to Congress, within six months of Oct. 19, 1976, regarding problems of and need for rail transportation services on Delaware-Maryland-Virginia peninsula.
#### Wilma Bauman, Respondent, v. Jay D. Fisher, Appellant. Floyd T. Bauman, Respondent, v. Jay D. Fisher, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, unless appellant perfects appeal, files note of issue, and files and serves record and brief on or before August 15, 1960 and is ready for argument at the September Term of this court, in which event the motion is denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4211 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-637 

Certain Hair Irons and 

Packaging Thereof
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4211 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-637 

Certain Hair Irons and 

Packaging Thereof
[File

No. 6729.]

#### LOUIS P. GOLDBERG, Appellant, v. JOHN GRAY, as Tax Commissioner of the State of North Dakota, Respondent.

(297 N. W. 128.)

Opinion filed March 27, 1941.

*H. O. Young*and *Francis Murphy,*for appellant.

*Alvin C. Strutz,*Attorney General, *G. F. Brace,*Assistant Attorney General, and *T. A. Thompson,*for respondent.

Morris, J.

The plaintiff in this case is a resident of the state of North Dakota and a member of the same partnership as that involved in the case of J. H. Goldberg v. John Gray, as Tax Commissioner of the state of North Dakota, ante, 663, 297 N. W. 124. The issues in the cases are identical. This case, therefore, is controlled by that decision, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion, the order sustaining the demurrer in this case is affirmed.

Burr, Ch. J., and Christianson, Nuessle, and Burke, JJ,, concur.