alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 761
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 761 appear at 64 FR 49917, Sept. 14, 1999.

§ 761.21 Plan requirement. ( a ) *General requirement.* To receive funding under this part, each PHDEP qualified recipient or AHDEP applicant must submit to HUD, for Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2000 and each following FFY, a plan for addressing the problem of drug-related and violent crime in and around the housing covered by the plan. If the plan covers more than one development, it does not have to address each development separately if the same activities will apply to each development. The plan must address each development separately only where program activities will differ from one development to another. The plan must include a description of the planned activity or activities, a description of the role of plan partners and their contributions to carrying out the plan, a budget and timetable for implementation of the activities, and the funding source for each activity, identifying in particular all activities to be funded under this part. In addition, the plan must set measurable performance goals and interim milestones for the PHDEP-supported activities and describe the system for monitoring and evaluating these activities. Measurable goals must be established for each category of funded activities, including drug prevention, drug intervention, drug treatment, tenant patrols, and physical improvements. The plan under this section serves as the application for PHDEP funding, and an otherwise qualified recipient that does not submit a PHDEP plan as required will not be funded. For AHDEP funding, NOFAs published in the Federal Register may provide additional information on plan requirements for purposes of this section. Plans must meet the requirements of this section before grant funds are distributed. HUD will review the submitted plans for a determination of whether they meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) *Additional requirements for consortia.* In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, to receive funding under this part, a consortium's plan must include a copy of the consortium agreement between the PHAs which are participating in the consortium, and a copy of the payment agreement between the consortium and HUD.
[64 FR 49920, Sept. 14, 1999]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3085 

To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and 

suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National 

Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, land 

components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2005 

Mr. WAMP (for himself, Mr. BERRY, Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina, Mr. 

BOREN, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mrs. EMERSON, 

Mr. SNYDER, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. 

DUNCAN, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. TANNER, Mr. FORD, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. LUCAS, and Mr. COLE of Oklahoma) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to update the 

feasibility and suitability study originally prepared for 

the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail and provide 

for the inclusion of new trail segments, land components, 

and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3085 IH 

1 SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEASIBILITY AND SUITABILITY 

2 STUDY OF TRAIL OF TEARS NATIONAL HIS3 TORIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(16) of the National Trails System Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(16)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘sub7 sections’’ and inserting ‘‘sections’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) Not later than one complete fiscal year after the 

11 date of the enactment of this subparagraph, the Secretary 

12 of the Interior shall submit to Congress a study regarding 

13 the feasibility and suitability of designating, as additional 

14 components of the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail, 

15 the Benge and Bell routes, the land components of the 

16 designated water routes in Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, 

17 and Oklahoma, the routes from the collection forts in Ala18 bama, Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee to the emi19 gration depots, and related campgrounds located along 

20 such routes and in such land components, by which the 

21 Cherokee Nation was removed to Oklahoma. Upon comple22 tion of the study, if the Secretary determines that such 

23 routes, land components, and campgrounds are a feasible 

24 and suitable addition to the Trail of Tears National His25 toric Trail, the Secretary shall designate such routes, land 

26 components, and campgrounds as components of the Trail 
3 

•HR 3085 IH 

1 of Tears National Historic Trail. The Secretary shall pub2 lish notice of the designation in the Federal Register.’’. 

Æ
### §1613a. ANCSA amendment

All land and interests in land in the State of Alaska conveyed by the Federal Government under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) to a Native Corporation and reconveyed by that Native Corporation, or a successor in interest, in exchange for any other land or interest in land in the State of Alaska and located within the same region (as defined in section 9(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1608(a)),1 to a Native Corporation under an exchange or other conveyance, shall be deemed, notwithstanding the conveyance or exchange, to have been conveyed pursuant to that Act.

(Pub. L. 109–221, title I, §102, May 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 337.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–203, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 688, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Native American Technical Corrections Act of 2006, and not as part of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act which comprises this chapter.

1 So in original. The comma probably should be preceded by an additional closing parenthesis.
§ 50.23 Public participation. HUD shall inform the affected public about NEPA-related hearings, public meetings, and the availability of environmental documents (see 40 CFR 1506.6(b)) in accordance with this section. Where project actions result in a FONSI, the FONSI will be available in the project file. The local HUD field office may be contacted by persons who wish to review the FONSI. In all cases, HUD shall mail notices to those who have requested them. Additional efforts for involving the public in specific notice or compliance requirements shall be made in accord with the implementing procedures of the laws and authorities cited in § 50.4. Notices pertaining to an EIS or an amendment to an EIS or a FONSI subject to § 50.34 shall be given to the public in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. ( a ) A NOI/EIS shall be forwarded to the AS/CPD to the attention of the Departmental Environmental Clearance Officer for publication in the Federal Register.
( b ) Notices will be bilingual if the affected public includes a significant portion of non-English speaking persons and will identify a date when the official public involvement element of the proposed action is to be completed and HUD internal processing is to continue.
( c ) All required notices shall be published in an appropriate local printed news medium or on an appropriate government website that is accessible to individuals with disabilities and provides meaningful access for individuals with Limited English Proficiency. The required notices shall be sent to individuals and groups known to be interested in the proposed action.
( d ) All notices shall inform the public where additional information may be obtained.
[61 FR 50916, Sept. 27, 1996, as amended at 89 FR 30903, Apr. 23, 2024]
### §971e. Definition of restored Alaskan lands

For the purposes of sections 971a to 971e of this title, the words "restored lands" include, without limiting the meaning thereof, those lands at Big Delta and Tok Junctions that are withdrawn by public land orders numbered 808 and 975 and that lie between the centerline of the Richardson and Glenn Highways and the land included within United States surveys 2727, 2728, 2770, 2771, 2772, 2773, 2774, 2723, 2724, 2725, and 2726.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 848, §5, as added Pub. L. 86–512, June 11, 1960, 74 Stat. 207.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 420d of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
Exhibit 4.8
 SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE
 Supplemental Indenture Supplemental Indenture Guaranteeing Subsidiary Company IASIS Capital, Issuers Trustee
  Indenture 3 4 Notes
 Subsidiary Guarantee
   Capitalized Terms
 Agreement to Guarantee
 No Recourse Against Others




---



##### 



Counterparts
 Effect of Headings
 The Trustee




---



##### 



BRIM HOLDING COMPANY, INC.By:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerIASIS HEALTHCARE LLCBy:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerIASIS CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerArizona Diagnostic & Surgical Center, Inc.
BAPTIST JOINT VENTURE HOLDINGS, INC.
BEAUMONT HOSPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
BILTMORE SURGERY CENTER, INC.
BILTMORE SURGERY CENTER HOLDINGS, INC.
DAVIS HOSPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
DAVIS SURGICAL CENTER HOLDINGS, INC.
DECISIONPOINT SERVICES, INC.
FIRST CHOICE PHYSICIANS NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC.
IASIS FINANCE, INC.
IASIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.
IASIS MANAGEMENT COMPANY
IASIS PORT ARTHUR ASC, INC.
IASIS PHYSICIAN SERVICES, INC.
IASIS TRANSCO, INC.
JORDAN VALLEY HOSPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.
MCS/AZ, INC.
NORTH VISTA HOSPITAL, INC.
PALMS OF PASADENA HOMECARE, INC.
PHYSICIAN GROUP OF FLORIDA, INC.
PHYSICIAN GROUP OF UTAH, INC.




---



##### 



UTAH TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES, INC.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
SALT LAKE REGIONAL PHYSICIANS, INC.
IASIS HOSPITAL NURSE STAFFING COMPANY
SOUTHRIDGE PLAZA HOLDINGS, INC.
SSJ ST. PETERSBURG HOLDINGS, INC.
TAMPA BAY STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC.By:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerSEABOARD DEVELOPMENT LLCBy:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial OfficerIASIS FINANCE TEXAS HOLDINGS, LLCBy:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



ST. LUKES BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL, LP
MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF TAMPA, LP
MESA GENERAL HOSPITAL, LP
PALMS OF PASADENA HOSPITAL, LP
SOUTHWEST GENERAL HOSPITAL, LP
ST. LUKES MEDICAL CENTER, LP
TOWN & COUNTRY HOSPITAL, LP
MOUNTAIN VISTA MEDICAL CENTER, LP
CARDIOVASCULAR SPECIALTY CENTERS OF UTAH, LP
IASIS GLENWOOD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, L.P.
THE HEART CENTER OF CENTRAL PHOENIX, L.P.
SALT LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, L.P.By:
    IASIS HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.,as General PartnerBy:
    /s/ John M. DoyleName:
    John M. DoyleTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as
TrusteeBy:
    /s/ Kristine PrallAuthorized Signature
#### In the Matter of Theodore Hood, Respondent, v Mary T. Munroe, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act to obtain reasonable visitation, the appeals are from four orders of the Family Court, Dutchess County, as follows: (1) an order dated February 14, 1977 which, *inter alia,*directed appellant to produce the infant son of the parties for examination by a psychiatrist and/or physician; (2) an order dated May 6, 1977 which, *inter alia,*granted the petitioner certain visitation rights; (3) an order dated August 10, 1977 which directed the appellant to produce the infant for visitation and permitted the petitioner to have the infant examined by a psychiatrist; and (4) an order dated August 25, 1977 which held appellant in contempt, directed the issuance of a warrant for her arrest, awarded counsel fees to the petitioner and granted petitioner custody of the infant. Appeals from the first three above-described orders dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Family Ct Act, § 1112). Order dated August 25,1977 reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for a plenary hearing before another Judge, with both parties and child to be present at such hearing. For reasons which may or may not have been proper, appellant Mary Munroe failed to appear at a number of scheduled hearings in the Family Court. Her absences resulted in án order of that court which held her in contempt, issued a warrant for her arrest, awarded petitioner some $15,000 in counsel fees and changed custody of the infant, Peter Hood, from her to the petitioner-respondent. Appellant’s principal contention on appeal is that the Family Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over this proceeding because the infant was neither present nor domiciled in New York during the pendency of the proceeding. This contention must fail. The Family Court has jurisdiction to determine visitation rights (Family Ct Act, § 651, subd [b]; *Matter of Juan R. v Necta V.,*55 AD2d 33), and courts have entertained jurisdiction of custody proceedings where the infant was absent when there was personal jurisdiction over both parents and both parents maintained residences in and other contacts with New York (see *People ex rel. Satti v Satti,*55 AD2d 149; *Matter of Horowitz v Huttler,*39 Misc 2d 11). The Family Court erred in holding the appellant in criminal contempt without providing her with an opportunity in open court to offer any reason in law or fact why she should not be so held (see *Matter of Katz v Murtagh,*28 NY2d 234, 236), and in altering a custodial arrangement of 10 years’ duration without holding a full hearing and without a showing of severely changed circumstances or parental unfitness (see *Matter of Ebert v Ebert,*38 NY2d 700; *Obey v Degling,*37 NY2d 768). Moreover, it does not appear that the best interests of the child were considered by the Family Court in *1059issuing its orders. For these reasons we have reversed and remanded this proceeding for a full hearing before a different Judge. Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
#### § 35.98 Impact on State and local requirements.

Nothing in this subpart shall relieve a seller, lessor, or agent from any responsibility for compliance with State or local laws, ordinances, codes, or regulations governing notice or disclosure of known lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards. Neither HUD nor EPA assumes any responsibility for ensuring compliance with such State or local requirements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.257 TSCA Title VI requirements.

Retailers and distributors must maintain bills of lading, invoices, or comparable documents that include a written statement from the supplier that the component or finished goods are TSCA Title VI compliant for a minimum of 3 years from the date of import, purchase, or shipment, consistent with 40 CFR 770.30(c) and 770.40.

[85 FR 5567, Jan. 31, 2020]
### §663. Restriction of sites to inclusion of necessary lands

Reservoir sites located or selected and to be located and selected shall be restricted to and shall contain only so much land as is actually necessary for the construction and maintenance of reservoirs; excluding so far as practicable lands occupied by actual settlers at the date of the location of said reservoirs.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §17, 26 Stat. 1101.)
### Gormas. Michael (OST)

From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Jeff Dean <jeffdeanjdc@gorge.net> Thursday, June 19, 2014 6:58 PM Gormas, Michael (OST) paul@flyalaskaseaplanes.com Air Service to Kake Michael, We have been operating a construction company in Kakefor approximately 3 years. We fly over $20,OOO/ year of parts/materials and people to/from Kake. Alaska Seaplanes has been providing quality service at reasonable prices. We would like to recommend Alaska Seaplanes for the essential air service to Kakefor the following reasoT
. Personnel: The pilots seem to be prbfessional, knowledgeable and skillful at their professional. The groundstaff in Kake are very helpful and go beyond a paycheck to get the materials we need
. Aircraft: The aircraft rate 9/10 interior and 9/10 exterior. The addition of IFR/Deicing capable aircraft

# 1the fleet was essential in gaining my recommendation. Business: The owners understand the struggles of small businesses and understand our success istheir success. Timeliness: When not restricted by weather Alaska Seaplanes departures and arrivals are on time. They seem to have the right number of planes, pilots, and people for the workload.

1 Alaska Office P.O. Box 191 Kake, AK 99830



### 5 t. Adams Highway Glenwood, WA 98619
### §970. Forfeiture of Arkansas pipeline right of way for violation of antitrust law

If any citizen, company, or corporation taking advantage of the benefits of sections 966 to 970 of this title shall violate the Act of July 2, 1890, entitled "An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies", (commonly known as the Sherman antitrust act), or any amendment thereof, the right of way granted in sections 966 to 970 of this title shall be forfeited without further action or declaration on the part of the Government or any proceedings or judgment of any court.

(Apr. 12, 1910, ch. 155, §5, 36 Stat. 296.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of July 2, 1890, referred to in text, is act July 2, 1890, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209, known as the Sherman Act, which is classified to sections 1 to 7 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1 of Title 15 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### §9833. Financial assistance for Head Start programs

The Secretary may, upon application by an agency which is eligible for designation as a Head Start agency pursuant to section 9836 of this title, provide financial assistance to such agency for a period of 5 years for the planning, conduct, administration, and evaluation of a Head Start program focused primarily upon children from low-income families who have not reached the age of compulsory school attendance which (1) will provide such comprehensive health, education, parental involvement, nutritional, social, and other services as will enable the children to attain their full potential and attain school readiness; and (2) will provide for direct participation of the parents of such children in the development, conduct, and overall program direction at the local level.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §638, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 499; Pub. L. 100–297, title II, §2504, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 330; Pub. L. 103–252, title I, §§103, 112(c), May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 625, 641; Pub. L. 105–285, title I, §104, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2705; Pub. L. 110–134, §4, Dec. 12, 2007, 121 Stat. 1367.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–134 inserted "for a period of 5 years" after "provide financial assistance to such agency".

1998—Cl. (1). Pub. L. 105–285 substituted "enable the children" for "aid the children" and inserted "and attain school readiness" before the semicolon.

1994—Pub. L. 103–252 struck out subsec. (a) designation, in cl. (1), substituted "health, education, parental involvement, nutritional, social, and other services" for "health, nutritional, educational, social, and other services", and struck out subsec. (b) which read as follows: "For purposes of providing financial assistance under subsection (a) of this section to agencies, the Secretary may not take into consideration whether such agency applies for or receives funds under subchapter V of this chapter."

1988—Pub. L. 100–297 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–252 effective May 18, 1994, but not applicable to Head Start agencies and other recipients of financial assistance under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) until Oct. 1, 1994, see section 127 of Pub. L. 103–252, set out as a note under section 9832 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 100–297, see section 6303 of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as a note under section 1071 of Title 20, Education.
### §5917. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–58, title X, §1009(b)(12), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 936

Section, Pub. L. 93–577, §18, as added Pub. L. 94–187, title III, §313, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1075; amended Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), title VII, §§703, 707, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 606, 607, related to energy information.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26791]



[[Page 78314]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m. EST, Tuesday, December 8, 2020.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission 
(``Commission'' or ``CFTC'') will hold this meeting to consider the 
following matters:
    <bullet> Final Rule: Electronic Trading Risk Principles;
    <bullet> Final Rule: Swap Execution Facilities (Audit Trail, 
Financial Resources, and CCO Requirements);
    <bullet> Final Rule: Exemptions from Swap Trade Execution 
Requirement;
    <bullet> Withdrawal of Unadopted Proposals in the 2018 SEF Proposed 
Rule: Swap Execution Facilities and Trade Execution Requirement;
    <bullet> Final Rule: Part 190 Bankruptcy Regulations;
    <bullet> Final Rule: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for 
Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (Minimum Transfer Amount);
    <bullet> Final Rule: Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for 
Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (Material Swap Exposure 
Definition and Initial Margin Calculation); and
    <bullet> Final Rule: Revision of Certain Regulatory Provisions to 
Incorporate Changes in the Commission's Administrative Structure.
    The agenda for this meeting will be available to the public and 
posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov. 
Instructions for public access to the live feed of the meeting will 
also be posted on the Commission's website. In the event that the time, 
date, or place of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, 
along with the new time, date, or place of the meeting, will be posted 
on the Commission's website.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary 
of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: December 1, 2020.
Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-26791 Filed 12-2-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P