alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2104. Preparation of guidelines

#### (a) Purposes of guidelines; publication in Federal Register

In order to encourage the development of underwater parks and the administrative cooperation necessary for the comprehensive management of underwater resources related to historic shipwrecks, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National Park Service, shall within nine months after April 28, 1988, prepare and publish guidelines in the Federal Register which shall seek to:

(1) maximize the enhancement of cultural resources;

(2) foster a partnership among sport divers, fishermen, archeologists, salvors, and other interests to manage shipwreck resources of the States and the United States;

(3) facilitate access and utilization by recreational interests;

(4) recognize the interests of individuals and groups engaged in shipwreck discovery and salvage.

#### (b) Consultation

Such guidelines shall be developed after consultation with appropriate public and private sector interests (including the Secretary of Commerce, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, sport divers, State Historic Preservation Officers, professional dive operators, salvors, archeologists, historic preservationists, and fishermen).

#### (c) Use of guidelines in developing legislation and regulations

Such guidelines shall be available to assist States and the appropriate Federal agencies in developing legislation and regulations to carry out their responsibilities under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–298, §5, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 433.)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

APPROXIMATELY $8,800 IN AMERICAN

EXPRESS TRAVELERS CHECKS, AND

ONE PENTAD 35mm CAMERA, SERIAL

NUMBER 1318242,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02308 WHA

ORDER CONTINUING STAY

This matter was previously stayed until at least August 26, 2010, at which time another

case management conference was scheduled. The case management conference is hereby

continued to SEPTEMBER 2, 2010, AT 11:00 A.M. The stay shall remain in effect until at least

that conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02308-WHA Document 21 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 8.28 Housing voucher programs. ( a ) In carrying out the requirements of this subpart, a recipient administering a Section 8 housing voucher program shall: ( 1 ) In providing notice of the availability and nature of housing assistance for low-income families under program requirements, adopt suitable means to assure that the notice reaches eligible individuals with handicaps;
( 2 ) In its activities to encourage participation by owners, include encouragement of participation by owners having accessible units;
( 3 ) When issuing a Housing Voucher to a family which includes an individual with handicaps include a current listing of available accessible units known to the PHA and, if necessary, otherwise assist the family in locating an available accessible dwelling unit;
( 4 ) Take into account the special problem of ability to locate an accessible unit when considering requests by eligible individuals with handicaps for extensions of Housing Vouchers; and
( 5 ) If necessary as a reasonable accommodation for a person with disabilities, approve a family request for an exception payment standard under § 982.503(d)(5) for a regular tenancy under the Section 8 voucher program so that the program is readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.
( b ) In order to ensure that participating owners do not discriminate in the recipient's federally assisted program, a recipient shall enter into a HUD-approved contract with participating owners, which contract shall include necessary assurances of nondiscrimination.
[53 FR 20233, June 2, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 23853, Apr. 30, 1998; 89 FR 38290, May 7, 2024]
### §7385s–13. Funding of administrative costs

There is authorized and hereby appropriated to the Secretary for fiscal year 2005 and thereafter such sums as may be necessary to carry out this part.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3684], as added Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3161, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2184.)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6961

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. PAUL A. BOYNE , Party

- in

- Interest

- Appellant , 8105 CREEKVIEW DRIVE SPRINGFIELD, VA 22153 , Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cr
- 00219

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : December 20, 2018 Decided: December 27, 2018

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Paul A. Boyne , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul A. Boyne appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s
issuance of a warrant as supported by probable cause

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by th e district

court. In re: Search of 8105 Creek View Drive, Springfield, VA 22153 , No. 1:17

- cr
00219

- LMB

- 1 (E.D. Va., July 23, 2018). We deny Boyne’s motions for the appointment of counsel and the rest of his pending motions. We dispense with oral argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §2113. Depository for agreements between States

The Archivist may receive duplicate originals or authenticated copies of agreements or compacts entered into under the Constitution and laws of the United States, between States of the Union, and take necessary actions for their preservation and servicing.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1290, §2109; renumbered §2113 and amended Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §§102(a)(1), 107(a)(7), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2280, 2286.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §397(h) (June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title V, §507, as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(d), 64 Stat. 583, and amended July 12, 1952, ch. 703, §1(o), (p), 66 Stat. 594; July 12, 1955, ch. 329, 69 Stat. 297; Aug. 12, 1955, ch. 859, 69 Stat. 695; July 3, 1956, ch. 513, §4, 70 Stat. 494; June 13, 1957, Pub. L. 85–51, 71 Stat. 69; Mar. 15, 1958, Pub. L. 85–341, §1(1), 72 Stat. 34).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2113 was renumbered section 2117 of this title.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–497, §107(a)(7), substituted "Archivist" for "Administrator of General Services".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
Document

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment is dated as of December 21, 2022 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) and amends that certain Employment Agreement dated as of December 21, 2016 (as amended from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”) by and between East West Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) and Irene Oh (“Employee”).
    
The following terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement are hereby modified as of the Amendment Effective Date: 


    1.    Section 2 (Term) of the Employment Agreement is hereby modified in its entirety to read as follows:  
This Agreement and employment under this Agreement shall terminate on December 21, 2023 unless extended by Company.   


2.    Except as expressly agreed to herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in force and effect.


    


                    EAST WEST BANCORP, INC.


                    By: _________________________




                    ____________________________
                    Employee:  Irene Oh
#### § 884.117 Disclosure and verification of Social Security and Employer Identification Numbers by owners.

To be eligible to become an owner of housing assisted under this part, the owner (other than a PHA) must meet the disclosure and verification requirements for Social Security and Employer Identification Numbers, as provided by 24 CFR part 5.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0204)

[54 FR 39707, Sept. 27, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 13593, Mar. 27, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 792
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 792 appear at 64 FR 26640, May 14, 1999.

§ 792.203 Application of amounts recovered. ( a ) The PHA may only use the amount of the recovery it is authorized to retain in support of the section 8 program in which the fraud occurred.
( b ) The remaining balance of the recovery proceeds (i.e., the portion of recovery the PHA is not authorized to retain) must be applied as directed by HUD.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., et

al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ

 C08-4118 BZ

 C09-2016 BZ

ORDER TO REPLY

The Diepenbrock firm is ORDERED to reply to the

opposition filed by Compass Vision by 5:00 p.m., Monday, 

June 14, 2010. The Court is especially troubled by the

apparent factual dispute over the role Mr. Swider was to play

and over whether Compass Vision is willing to pay

Diepenbrock’s fees. Authority which discusses whether nonpayment of fees is grounds for withdrawal under California law

would also be helpful. Diepenbrock and Mr. Swider shall bring

copies of their respective retainer agreements to the hearing. 

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ Document 74 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

A hearing on the matter is scheduled for Wednesday, June 16,

2010 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal

Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California

94102. 

 Dated: June 11, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\ORDER TO REPLY.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ Document 74 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: September 30, 2008

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE

JACKSON, a minor, BRIANA FREDRANIQUE

ANNETTE JACKSON, a minor, and SHAWN

YVETTE MARTIN, 

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF PITTSBURG, AARON L. BAKER, 

et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01016 WHA

ORDER SETTING

HEARING ON

DEFENDANTS’

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

Concerning defendants’ discovery dispute, as outlined in their letter of May 4, 2010,

counsel are ORDERED to attend a further meet-and-confer on WEDNESDAY, MAY 12, 2010, FROM

11:00 A.M.–2:00 P.M. in the Attorney’s Lounge on the eighteenth floor of the federal courthouse. 

At 2:00 p.m. that same day, the Court shall hold a hearing to resolve any remaining issue(s). 

Please note that only those who personally attend the meet-and-confer in the Attorney’s Lounge

may be heard at the hearing. Plaintiffs’ response is due by NOON ON MONDAY, MAY 10.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 87 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 1
### §§75, 76. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 75, acts Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 521, §1, 26 Stat. 833; May 28, 1928, ch. 824, 45 Stat. 789, relating to rules as to accommodations for export animals, was transferred to section 466a of Title 46, Shipping, and subsequently repealed and reenacted as section 3901 of Title 46 by Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 500. Section 3901 of Title 46 was subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10418(a)(20), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 508.

Section 76, acts Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 521, §2, 26 Stat. 833; May 28, 1928, ch. 824, 45 Stat. 790, relating to penalties for rule violations, was transferred to section 466b of Title 46, and subsequently repealed and reenacted as section 3902 of Title 46 by Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 500. Section 3902 of Title 46 was subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10418(a)(20), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 508.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIO DRAKES,

Petitioner,

v.

JERRY BROWN, Attorney General

of the State of California; 

CHUCK ROSA, Warden, La Palma

Correctional Center

Respondents. /

No. C 08-2686 SI (PR)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST 

FOR A CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

The Court denied the petition filed in the above-titled action, and entered judgment for

Respondents. Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal, which this Court deems a request for a

certificate of appealability. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1991). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue. Reasonable jurists would not “find the

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.” Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Petitioner may seek a certificate of appealability from the Court of

Appeals. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 21, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02686-SI Document 21 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamone Crum, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 834]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), rendered July 20, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02 [1]). The knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to County Court’s suppression ruling *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Reynolds,*278 AD2d 937 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 805 [2001]), as well as his challenge to the severity of the sentence *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.
### §968. Restriction on use of Arkansas pipeline right of way

Nothing in sections 966 to 970 of this title shall authorize the use of such right of way except for the pipe line, and then only so far as may be necessary for its construction, maintenance, and care.

(Apr. 12, 1910, ch. 155, §3, 36 Stat. 296.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### §775. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–455, title I, 74 Stat. 106, related to contributions for costs of management of lands and for surveying federally controlled lands, was from the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1961, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

June 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–60, title I, 72 Stat. 93.

June 4, 1958, Pub. L. 85–439, title I, 72 Stat. 156.

July 1, 1957, Pub. L. 85–77, title I, 71 Stat. 258.

June 13, 1956, ch. 380, title I, 70 Stat. 258.

June 16, 1955, ch. 147, title I, 69 Stat. 142.

July 1, 1954, ch. 446, title I, 68 Stat. 362.

July 31, 1953, ch. 298, title I, 67 Stat. 263.

July 9, 1952, ch. 597, title I, 66 Stat. 447.
D:\netsite-docs\lps90589\NG_15-2.pdf
----

| 1. | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |   |                                                                                               |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| September 19,      2008 |   | /s/    THOMAS A. BORNER                |
| Date                         |   | Thomas      A. Borner                                                                              |
|                         |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                                                         |
|                         |   |                                                                                               |
| September 19,      2008 |   | /s/    ROBERT J. HALLORAN, JR.         |
| Date                         |   | Robert      J. Halloran, Jr.                                                                       |
|                         |   | President      and Treasurer                                                                       |
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-209-2020]


Foreign-Trade Zone 37--Orange County, New York; Application for 
Subzone; JJS Transportation and Distribution Co Inc Valley Stream, New 
York

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the County of Orange, grantee of FTZ 37, requesting subzone 
status for the facility of JJS Transportation and Distribution Co Inc, 
located in Valley Stream, New York. The application was submitted 
pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 
400). It was formally docketed on November 25, 2020.
    The proposed subzone (0.69 acres) is located at 145 Hook Creek 
Boulevard, Valley Stream, Nassau County, New York. No authorization for 
production activity has been requested at this time. The proposed 
subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 37.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman 
of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and 
make recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe988a84be8a8c9f9a9bd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2c4d6d8e2d6d0c3c6c78cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is January 13, 
2021. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to January 28, 2021.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Reading Room'' section of the FTZ Board's website, which is 
accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dc8e1e4f7ecefe8f9e5a3dae5e4f9e8e0ece3cdf9ffece9e8a3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="10557c796a71727564783e47787964757d717e5064627174753e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 30, 2020.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26727 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Charles J. Pond, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, *v.*Abijah Comstock, Impleaded, etc., Respondent.

(Argued November 21, 1881;

decided December 6, 1881.)

Reported below, 20 Hun, 492.

*Samuel Hamd*for appellant.

*Nathaniel O. Moah*for respondent.

Agree to affirm on opinion of General Term.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.