alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1323. Interstate Commerce Commission: report

In addition to the usual number of the annual report of the Interstate Commerce Commission, three thousand copies shall be printed: one thousand for the Senate, two thousand for the House, and for the use of the Commission that number of the report and other documents incident to interstate commerce for distribution by it as it considers expedient.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1269.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §269 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 614).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions

Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.
### §12307. Regulations on numbering and fees

The authority issuing a number under this chapter may prescribe regulations and establish fees to carry out the intent of this chapter. The fees shall apply equally to residents and nonresidents of the State. A State issuing authority may impose only conditions for vessel numbering that are—

(1) prescribed by this chapter or regulations of the Secretary about the standard numbering system; or

(2) related to proof of payment of State or local taxes.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 591.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 12307 | 46:1472 |

Section 12307 provides the States or the Secretary with the authority to prescribe regulations and establish fees for carrying out the requirements of this chapter. The fee must apply equally to residents and nonresidents of the State in which the vessel is numbered.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.356 Disqualification and requalification of primary inspection agencies. ( a ) The Secretary, based on monitoring reports or on other reliable information, may determine that a primary inspection agency which has been accepted under this subpart is not adequately carrying out one or more of its required functions. In so determining, the Secretary shall consider the impact of disqualification on manufacturers and other affected parties and shall seek to assure that the manufacturing process is not disrupted unnecessarily. Whenever the Secretary disqualifies a primary inspection agency under this section, the primary inspection agency shall have a right to a Formal or Informal Presentation of Views under subpart D of this part.
( b ) Interested persons may petition the Secretary to disqualify a primary inspection agency under the provisions of § 3282.156(b).
( c ) A primary inspection agency which has been disqualified under paragraph (a) may resubmit an application under § 3282.353. The submission shall include a full explanation of how problems or inadequacies which resulted in disqualifications have been rectified and how the primary inspection agency shall assure that such problems shall not recur.
( d ) When appropriate, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register or otherwise make available to the public for comment a disqualified PIA's application for requalification, subject to the provisions of § 3282.54.
( e ) Both provisional and final acceptance of any IPIA (or DAPIA) automatically expires at the end of any period of one year during which it has not acted as an IPIA (or DAPIA). An IPIA (or DAPIA) has not acted as such unless it has actively performed its services as an IPIA (or DAPIA) for at least one manufacturer by which it has been selected. An IPIA (or DAPIA) whose acceptance has expired pursuant to this section may resubmit an application under § 3282.353 in order to again be qualified as an IPIA (or DAPIA), when it can show a bona fide prospect of performing IPIA (or DAPIA) services.
[41 FR 19852, May 13, 1976, as amended at 45 FR 59311, Sept. 9, 1980; 51 FR 34468, Sept. 29, 1986]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONOF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, David M. Obstler,certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1(the “Report”) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,2009 of RiskMetrics Group, Inc.; and

 

2.       Based on my knowledge, the Report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by the Report.

 

Date: April 30, 2010

 

 
| /s/ DAVID M.  OBSTLER  |   |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|
| David M. Obstler                 |   |   |
| *(Principal  Financial Officer)* |   |   |

 

----
§ 574.100 Eligible applicants. ( a ) Eligible States and qualifying cities, as defined in § 574.3, qualify for formula allocations under HOPWA.
( b ) HUD will notify eligible States and qualifying cities of their formula eligibility and allocation amounts and EMSA service areas annually.
[57 FR 61740, Dec. 28, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 17199, Apr. 11, 1994; 60 FR 1917, Jan. 5, 1995]
Order 2012

- 8

- 19

Served: August 17,2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 17 th day of August , 2012

Fitness Determination of

KEY LIME AIR CORPORA TION

as a commuter air carr ier under section 49 U.S.C. § 41738 Docket DOT

- OST

- 2009

- 0116

FINAL ORDER

ERRATUM

By Order 2012

- 8

- 11 , issued August 7, 2012

, we indicated that we were making final our

tentative findings that Key Lime Air Corporation (“Key Lime”) “ is fit, willing, and able to

provide scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier using small aircraft pursuant to

Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

. ” The ordering paragraph also reflected this same

restriction on Key Lime ’ s operations. However, our t entative findings did not propose to limit

the air carrier’s operations to Part 135. W e are issuing this erratum to delete language

referencing a Part 135 restriction on Key Lime’s operations.

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We delete “ pursuant to Part 135 of the Feder al Aviation Regulations” from paragraph 1 page

1 of Order 2012

- 8

- 11

.

2. We delete “ pursuant to Part 135 of the Federal Aviation Regulations” from ordering

paragraph 1 page 1 of Order 2012

- 8

- 11.

3. We will serve a copy of this order on the persons listed in Attachment A.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.govAttachment A

SERVICE LIS T FOR

KEY LIME AIR

CORPORATION

CLIFFORD HONEYCUTT

PRESIDENT

KEY LIME AIR CORPORATION

13252 EAST CONTROL TOWER ROAD

ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 80112 GERALD F MURPHY

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVNUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20004

- 2595 MR PETER LYNCH AGC

- 3 00

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR

ENFORCEMENT

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION SECTION MANAGER

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166 CHRISTOPHER A LANG

PRIN CIP AL OPERATIONS

INSPECTOR

FEDERAL AVIATION

ADMINISTRATION

DENVER FSDO

26805 EAST 68 TH AVENUE

DENVER COLORADO 8024 9 OFFICE OF AIRLINE

INFORMATION

DOT/R IT A

/BTS

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
```

[110th Congress Public Law 149]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ149.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 1819]]

Public Law 110-149
110th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
     for other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 21, 2007 -  [H.J. Res. 72]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 110-92 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 
106(3) <<NOTE: Ante, 1454.>> and inserting ``December 31, 2007''.

    Sec. 2.  Public Law 110-92 is further amended by adding at the end 
the following new sections:
    ``Sec. 160. Notwithstanding <<NOTE: Julia Carson.>> any other 
provision of this joint resolution, there is appropriated for payment to 
the heirs at law of Julia Carson, late a Representative from the State 
of Indiana, $165,200.

    ``Sec. 161. Notwithstanding <<NOTE: Termination date. 38 USC 1710 
note.>> section 106, the authority to provide care and services under 
section 1710(e)(1)(E) of title 38, United States Code, shall continue in 
effect through September 30, 2008.

    ``Sec. 162. Notwithstanding <<NOTE: Termination date. 38 USC 2300 
note.>> section 106, the authority provided by section 2306(d)(3) of 
title 38, United States Code, shall continue in effect through September 
30, 2008.''.

    Approved December 21, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 72:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Dec. 19, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 401.601 [Reserved]
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00444

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096

- 335857

- 22

Before Walker, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Kerr, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### O MAR 

### A POLO 

### J ACOBO 

### , Appellant

V



### . J OHN 

### M. M ARTIN 

### FWPD B ADGE 

### 4112 (F ORT 

### W ORTH 

### P OLICE



### D EPARTMENT



### ) , Appe llee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 23, 20 23 and April 10, 2023, we notified appellant that he did not
comply with certain Texas Rules of Civi l Procedure and requested that appellant file

an amended brief that complied with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

. See

Tex. R . App. P. 9.4, 38. 1 , and 2nd Tex. App. (Fort Worth) Loc. R. 1 . We stated that

we may strike appellant ’ s brief and dismiss the appeal unless , within ten days,
appellant filed with the court a n amended brief

. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 38.9(a),

42.3. We have received no response.
Because appellant has failed to file a n amended brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to do so , we strike appell ant ’ s brief and dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecu tion. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : May 18 , 2023
### §392a. Payment into reclamation fund of receipts from irrigation projects; transfer of power revenues to General Treasury after repayment of construction costs

All moneys received by the United States in connection with any irrigation projects, including the incidental power features thereof, constructed by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Reclamation, and financed in whole or in part with moneys heretofore or hereafter appropriated or allocated therefor by the Federal Government, shall be covered into the reclamation fund, except in cases where provision has been made by law or contract for the use of such revenues for the benefit of users of water from such project: Provided, That after the net revenues derived from the sale of power developed in connection with any of said projects shall have repaid those construction costs of such project allocated to power to be repaid by power revenues therefrom and shall no longer be required to meet the contractual obligations of the United States, then said net revenues derived from the sale of power developed in connection with such project shall, after the close of each fiscal year, be transferred to and covered into the General Treasury as "miscellaneous receipts": Provided further, That nothing in this section shall be construed to amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act (45 Stat. 1057), as amended [43 U.S.C. 617 et seq.], or to apply to irrigation projects of the Office of Indian Affairs.

(May 9, 1938, ch. 187, 52 Stat. 322.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Boulder Canyon Project Act (45 Stat. 1057), as amended, referred to in text, is act Dec. 21, 1928, ch. 42, 45 Stat. 1057, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§617 et seq.) of chapter 12A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 617t of this title and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
### §14504. Remeasurement

(a) To the extent necessary, the Secretary shall remeasure a vessel to which this chapter applies if—

(1) the Secretary or the owner alleges an error in its measurement;

(2) the vessel or the use of its space is changed in a way that substantially affects its tonnage;

(3) after being measured under subchapter III of this chapter, the vessel becomes subject to subchapter II of this chapter because the vessel or its use is changed; or

(4) although not required to be measured under subchapter II of this chapter, the vessel was measured under subchapter II and the owner requests that the vessel be measured under subchapter III of this chapter.

(b) Except as provided in this section and chapter 143 of this title, a vessel that has been measured does not have to be remeasured to obtain another document or endorsement under chapter 121 of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title V, §5101(3), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1923.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### Revised section 14504

Source: Section (U.S. Code) 46 App. U.S.C. 71.

Section 14504(a) provides that the Secretary shall remeasure a vessel that has been measured under the regulatory measurement system if either the Secretary or the owner alleges an error in its measurement; if the vessel, or its use, undergoes a substantial change affecting its tonnage; if the vessel loses its eligibility for measurement under the simplified system because of a change in the vessel or its use; or if the vessel owner requests that the vessel be measured under the simplified system after having been measured under the standard regulatory measurement system. Section 14504(b) provides that a vessel that has been measured does not have to be remeasured to obtain another document or endorsement under chapter 121—"Documentation of Vessels"—except as provided above or in chapter 143 of this subtitle.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               15114
<SECURITIES>                                         69329
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    144282
<PP&E>                                              132860
<DEPRECIATION>                                      106458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       39040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               572345
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             20
<COMMON>                                             89055
<OTHER-SE>                                         (271360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        390040
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       543353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (533942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (533942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (533942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.60)



</TABLE>
#### Sarah Kohn, appellant, v. Joseph Bayer et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 28,493.

Bill to redeem from mortgage loan and for an accounting. Cross-bill to foreclose. Bill dismissed. Cross-bill granted. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

William Slack, for appellant. A. S. and E. W. Froehlieh, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
NO. 05-13-01509-CR

BRYAN WILLIAM REED § IN THE COURT OF

§

VS. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Bryan William Reed, Appellant in the above styled and 

numbered cause, and moves for an extension of time of 45 days to file a petition 

for discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following:

1. On January 29, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's 

conviction. Bryan William Reed v. State, 380th Judicial District Court of Collin 

County, Texas, under Cause # Cause No. 380-8024443-2013

The judgment date was October 21, 2013.. This petition is therefore due on 

02/13/2015.

2. Counsel has been unable to complete the petition for the following 

reasons: Defendant has retained New Counsel. Substituted Counsel will require 

additional time to prepare and file Petition for Discretionary Review..

3. Defendant is currently free on bond.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully 

PD-0166-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 2/11/2015 6:23:44 PM

Accepted 2/12/2015 9:31:38 AM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
requests an extension of 45 days, i.e. until March 30, 2015, to file a petition for

discretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

Fasoro Law PLLC

8330 LBJ FWY Suite 290

Dallas, Texas 75243

(214) 705-3475

(214) 705-3472 (Fax Number)

By: /S/ Kunle Fasoro

Kunle Fasoro

State Bar No. 24086455

kfasoro@fasorolaw.com

Attorney for Bryan William Reed

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on February 11, 2015, a true and correct copy of the

above and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Dallas

County, by electronic service through the Electronic Filing Manager.

/S/ Kunle Fasoro

Kunle Fasoro
7/28/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 160 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 160 Filed 07/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 160 Filed 07/28/15 Page 3 of 3
United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

N a me 774~J

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

~No

If yes, please provide an email or postal address:

0’
United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

Na me

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

No

If yes, please provide an email or postal address:
~

United States

Protection

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

I

Name ~ti~4&~ ~J~Jc~

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

Yes oV~ioi

If yes, please provide an email or postal address~
United States

Environmental Protection

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

Name

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

Yes or No

If yes, please provide an email or postal address:
United States

~~~rMEn”ir0nmentaI Protection

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

Name Ic~ci~ ~

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

Yes or No

If yes, please provide an email or postal address:
~

United States

Environmental Protection

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

Name I C~S

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

Yes or No

If yes, please provide an email or postal address:
~*~ United States

~ Environmental Protection

l~Agency

Speaker Request Form

(Please Print Clearly)

Name

Would you like to be added to our mailing list for this action?

No

If yes, please provide an email or postal address:
§ 3280.109 Room requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75744 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) Every manufactured home shall have at least one living area with not less than 150 sq. ft. of gross floor area.
( b ) Rooms designed for sleeping purposes shall have a minimum gross square foot floor area as follows: ( 1 ) All bedrooms shall have at least 50 sq. ft. of floor area.
( 2 ) Bedrooms designed for two or more people shall have 70 sq. ft. of floor area plus 50 sq. ft. for each person in excess of two.
( c ) Every room designed for sleeping purposes shall have accessible clothes hanging space with a minimum inside depth of 22 inches and shall be equipped with a rod and shelf.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, and further redesignated at 58 FR 55004, Oct. 25, 1993]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1705

DARAMUS JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FREDA THORNTON, owner,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00576-JCC-ID)

Submitted: September 29, 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daramus Jones, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daramus Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) 

(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Jones v. Thornton, No. 1:16-cv-00576-JCC-IDD 

(E.D. Va. June 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED