alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1963

___________ Darwin Butler, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. The Curators of the University * of Missouri, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 3, 2002 Filed: October 21, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Darwin Butler appeals the district court’s 1 order granting defendant’s motion to enforce a settlement. Upon careful review of the record, we reject Mr. Butler’s argument that the lien asserted by the Division of Child Support Enforcement-2- (“Division”) was not perfected. The Division filed proper notice under Mo. Rev. Stat. § 454.505 thereby perfecting a lien on Mr. Butler’s settlement proceeds. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order enforcing the settlement agreement. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### §11506. Carrying sheath knives

A seaman in the merchant marine may not wear a sheath knife on board a vessel without the consent of the master. The master of a vessel of the United States shall inform each seaman of this prohibition before engagement. A master failing to advise a seaman is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of $50.

(Pub. L. 98–89, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 584.)

| Revised section | Source section (U.S. Code) |
| --- | --- |
| 11506 | 46:710 |

Section 11506 prohibits a merchant seaman from carrying a sheath knife without permission of the master, and penalizes a master who does not advise a seaman of this provision.
(March 7, 1978)

#### Daro Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants, v RAS Enterprises, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 20, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by H. Schwartz, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellants $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Lane and Lynch, JJ.
****

**Applied Fluid Dynamics**
***Computational Aeroscience*
NASA's Numerical Propulsion Simulation System (NPSS) focuses on  reducing both the cost and the timeto develop aeropropulsion  systems.  NPSS will build a simulation environment that allows for  theconstruction of arbitrary engine configurations for design and  analysis.  The environment will permita choice of analysis  techniques, analysis complexity, languages with which to describe  thealgorithms, and the ability to access and manage data from  various sources. 
NPSS MOD1 was released in 1994.  It employs an object-based model  for engine simulations:  enginecomponents, such as the compressor,  combustor, turbine, and shaft, can be modeled as independent entities that can be replaced with models of greater fidelity that  execute on different computingplatforms in a dynamic environment.   An engineer can configure engines with ease using thisenvironment  and a graphical user interface. 
This work is being conducted at NASA Lewis Research Center in  Cleveland, OH.  Researchers at Lewisare working with the U.S.  aeropropulsion industry to define a U.S. standard for select design  codes.
One component of NPSS is the MSTAGE multistage compressor  analysis software that has been implementedon the Cray Research  C90, IBM SP-1, and IBM workstation cluster at NASA Lewis.  This  software hasbeen used to analyze the flow physics involved in  compressor stall that has suggested severalapproaches to  improving compression system performance and increasing stall  margins.  This work ispart of a NASA/MIT/Pratt and Whitney effort.   A 1.5 percent reduction in Specific Fuel Consumption(SFC) for a  large commercial aircraft engine was demonstrated at Pratt and  Whitney; this result wasachieved in half the historical design time. 
Other NASA accomplishments include the installation of a 160-node  IBM SP-2, located at NASA AmesResearch Center, which performs at  a sustained rate of 11.64 Gflops in NASA Parallel Benchmark codes; this was accomplished through a Cooperative Research Agreement, a  new method of doing business forNASA.  Additionally, the  Framework for Interdisciplinary Design and Optimization (FIDO)  project,located at NASA Langley Research Center, is developing a  general computational environment forperforming multidisciplinary  design using networked heterogeneous computing systems.  Such a graphical interface provides easier understanding and access to data  than previous text-basedmethods, and requires less training for  users. 
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/hpccm/accomp/94accomp/cas94.accomps/cas4.html**
(May 15, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Albert Martin Cohen, an Attorney, Respondent. Denis M. Hurley, Petitioner.

Application by respondent to vacate order disbarring him. The issue raised (1) as to whether, on the basis of the proof previously adduced before the Judicial Inquiry and on the basis of any additional proof which may be adduced, respondent is guilty of the charges now made against him by petitioner; and (2) as to whether, in the light of all of such proof, the respondent presently possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counselor at law (Judiciary Law, § 90), are referred to Hon. Peter M. Daly, Official Referee, for the purpose of holding hearings and taking such additional proof as the parties may submit and such additional proof as the Referee may deem necessary; and for the purpose of rendering a report to this court setting forth his findings and recommendations. Pending such hearings and report, the application will be held in abeyance. Motion by respondent for bill of particulars of the charges, granted; the bill to be served by petitioner within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Motion by respondent for copy of the Judicial Inquiry report to this court relating to him, denied. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
(A) THE COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE WEEKS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FORM 10QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                       2,030,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    149,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,516,523
<PP&E>                                       3,970,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,706,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,510,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,563
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,377,324
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,706,425
<SALES>                                      2,685,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,685,182
<CGS>                                          934,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  934,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,196,693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (442,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (442,032)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (442,032)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
23.1








Consent
of Independent Accountants





We
hereby consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 40-F of ACE
Aviation Holdings Inc. (“ACE”) of our report dated February 7, 2008 relating to
the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 40-F.





We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 333-129248) and on Form F-10 (No. 333-142272) of ACE of our
report dated February 7, 2008 relating to the financial statements and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 40-F.  We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm" in this
Form 40-F.








/S/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Chartered
Accountants





Montreal,
Canada





February
7, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant

 /

No. C 09-2668 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

SERVE UPON PLAINTIFF

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AND TO

FILE PROOF OF SERVICE THEREOF;

SETTING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF

TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

In this action, plaintiff Daniel Rodriguez, proceeding pro se, seeks judicial review of a

decision of the Social Security Administration, specifically, a decision of an administrative

law judge dated February 23, 2007.

On December 16, 2009, defendant filed three documents: (1) an answer to plaintiff’s

complaint; (2) a two-page “Notice of Filing Social Security Administrative Transcript”; and

(3) a certified copy of the administrative transcript, which transcript is 75 pages in length.

On December 17, 2009, defendant filed a proof of service in which defendant stated

that he had served plaintiff with the “Answer, and Manual Filing Notification of Administrative

Transcript,” which documents appear to be references to the first two of the abovedescribed three documents filed by defendant on December 16, 2009. The proof of service

does not indicate that defendant served the administrative transcript upon plaintiff.

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 18 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, defendant is hereby DIRECTED to serve plaintiff, no later than February

5, 2010, with a copy of the administrative record, and to file, no later than February 5, 2010,

proof of such service.

Further, plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file, no later than March 12, 2010, a motion

for summary judgment. In such motion, plaintiff shall set forth all arguments in support of

his position that the administrative law judge’s decision of February 23, 2007 is erroneous. 

The Court hereby informs plaintiff that a failure to file a motion for summary judgment may

result in dismissal of the above-titled action for failure to prosecute.

The deadline for defendant to file an opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment or a counter-motion, as well as the deadline for plaintiff to file a reply thereto,

remain as set forth in the Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions, filed June

16, 2009. Specifically, defendant shall file opposition or a counter-motion within 30 days of

the date of service of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and plaintiff shall file any reply

within 14 days of the date of service of defendant’s opposition or counter-motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02668-MMC Document 18 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 203.405 Debenture interest rate. ( a ) Debentures shall bear interest from the date of issue, payable semiannually on the first day of January and the first day of July of each year at the rate in effect as of the day the commitment was issued, or as of the date the mortgage was endorsed for insurance, whichever rate is higher. For applications involving mortgages originated under the single family Direct Endorsement program, debentures shall bear interest from the date of issue, payable semiannually on the first day of January and on the first day of July of each year at the rate in effect as of the date the mortgage was endorsed for insurance;
( b ) For mortgages endorsed for insurance after January 23, 2004, if an insurance claim is paid in cash, the debenture interest rate for purposes of calculating such a claim shall be the monthly average yield, for the month in which the default on the mortgage occurred, on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years.
[71 FR 35994, June 22, 2006]
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-132998 onForm S-8, of CommunitySouth Financial Corporation (formerly known asCommunitySouth Bancshares, Inc.) relating to the CommunitySouth Bancshares,Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, of our report, dated March 30, 2009, thatis incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofCommunitySouth Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 
| /s/ Elliott Davis, LLC      |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
|                        |   |
| Greenville, South  Carolina |   |
| March 30, 2009         |   |

 

----
----

----

| Delaware                                                                |   | 1-9618                     |   | 36-3359573                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| (State      or other jurisdiction ofincorporation      or organization) |   | (Commission      File No.) |   | (I.R.S.      EmployerIdentification      No.) |

| 4201      Winfield Road, P.O. Box 1488, Warrenville, Illinois |   | 60555           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
| (Address      of principal executive offices)                 |   | (Zip      Code) |

----

----

----

|   | NAVISTAR      INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Registrant                              |

| Date:      November 13, 2008 | /s/      Terry M.      Endsley                                                       |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Terry      M. EndsleyExecutive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.304 Inadequate State plan.

If the Secretary determines that a State plan submitted under this subpart is not adequate, the designated State agency shall be informed of the additions and corrections required for approval. A revised State plan shall be submitted within 30 days of receipt of such determination. If the revised State plan is inadequate or if the State fails to resubmit within the 30 day period or otherwise indicates that it does not intend to change its State plan as submitted, the Secretary shall notify the designated State agency that the State plan is not approved and that it has a right to a hearing on the disapproval in accordance with subpart D of this part.
### §1909. Requirements of depository libraries; reports on conditions; investigations; termination; replacement

Only a library able to provide custody and service for depository materials and located in an area where it can best serve the public need, and within an area not already adequately served by existing depository libraries may be designated by Senators, Representatives, the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico, the Commissioner of the District of Columbia,1 or the Governors of Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands as a depository of Government publications. The designated depository libraries shall report to the Superintendent of Documents at least every two years concerning their condition.

The Superintendent of Documents shall make firsthand investigation of conditions for which need is indicated and include the results of investigations in his annual report. When he ascertains that the number of books in a depository library is below ten thousand, other than Government publications, or it has ceased to be maintained so as to be accessible to the public, or that the Government publications which have been furnished the library have not been properly maintained, he shall delete the library from the list of depository libraries if the library fails to correct the unsatisfactory conditions within six months. The Representative or the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico in whose area the library is located or the Senator who made the designation, or a successor of the Senator, and, in the case of a library in the District of Columbia, the Commissioner of the District of Columbia, and, in the case of a library in Guam, American Samoa, or the Virgin Islands, the Governor, shall be notified and shall then be authorized to designate another library within the area served by him, which shall meet the conditions herein required, but which may not be in excess of the number of depository libraries authorized by laws within the State, district, territory, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, as the case may be.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1285.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §86 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §70, 28 Stat. 612; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–579, §6, 76 Stat. 354).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Commissioner of District of Columbia, as established under Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1967, eff. Nov. 3, 1967 (in part), 32 F.R. 11669, 81 Stat. 948, abolished as of noon Jan. 2, 1975, by Pub. L. 93–198, title VII, §711, Dec. 24, 1973, 87 Stat. 818, and replaced by office of Mayor of District of Columbia by section 421 of Pub. L. 93–198.

1 See Transfer of Functions note below.
§ 8.50 Assurances required. ( a ) *Assurances.* An applicant for Federal financial assistance for a program or activity to which this part applies shall submit an assurance to HUD, or in the case of a subrecipient to a primary recipient, on a form specified by the responsible civil rights official, that the program or activity will be operated in compliance with this part. An applicant may incorporate these assurances by reference in subsequent applications to the Department.
( b ) *Duration of obligation.* ( 1 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended in the form of real property or to provide real property or structures on the property, the assurance will obligate the recipient or, in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structures are used for the purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
( 2 ) In the case of Federal financial assistance extended to provide personal property, the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property.
( 3 ) In all other cases the assurance will obligate the recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended.
( c ) *Covenants.* ( 1 ) Where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of real property or interest in the property from the Department, the instrument effecting or recording this transfer shall contain a covenant running with the land to assure nondiscrimination for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits.
( 2 ) Where no transfer of property is involved but property is purchased or improved with Federal financial assistance, the recipient shall agree to include the covenant described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section in the instrument effecting or recording any subsequent transfer of the property.
( 3 ) Where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of real property or interest in the property from the Department, the covenant shall also include a condition coupled with a right to be reserved by the Department to revert title to the property in the event of a breach of the covenant. If a transferee of real property proposes to mortgage or otherwise encumber the real property as security for financing construction of new, or improvement of existing, facilities on the property for the purposes for which the property was transferred, the Secretary may, upon request of the transferee and if necessary to accomplish such financing and upon such conditions as he or she deems appropriate, agree to forbear the exercise of such right to revert title for so long as the lien of such mortgage or other encumbrance remains effective.
### §390h–16. Willow Lake Natural Treatment System Project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the city of Salem, Oregon, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Willow Lake Natural Treatment System Project to reclaim and reuse wastewater within and without the service area of the city of Salem.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation and maintenance of the project authorized by this section.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1634, as added Pub. L. 105–321, §6(a), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 3025.)
#### § 401.556 Leasing units to voucher holders.

A Restructuring Plan must prohibit any refusal of the owner to lease a unit solely because of the status of the prospective tenant as a section 8 voucher holder.