alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 12, 2019

t0605 

# Order

Clerk June 12, 2019

158077

In re PAROLE OF RONALD IRWIN

.

_________________________________________

MACOMB COUNTY PROSECUTING

ATTORNEY,

Appellee,

v SC: 158077

COA: 342963

Macomb CC: 2017

- 000053

- AP

RONALD IRWIN,

Appellant,

_________________________________________

PAROLE BOARD,

Interve nor.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 7, 2018 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting

leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on

leave granted, of whether the Parole Board clearly abused its discretion by granting

parole. We note that a similar issue was presented in In re Parole of Layman (Docket

No. 157104) , which we remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave

granted by order dated April 3, 2018, and which was decided in In re Parole of Layman

, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued September 20, 2018

(Docket No. 341112). Further, w e note that a similar issue is presented in In re Parole of

Plunkett (Docket No. 159032), which we remanded to the Court of Appeals for

consideration as on leave granted by order dated June 12 , 2019. In all other respects,

leave to appeal is DENIED, becau se we are not persuaded that the remaining questions

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIANO , J. did not participate because he presided in the circuit court as the

sentencing judge in the underlying criminal case.
§ 578.27 Consolidated plan. ( a ) *States or units of general local government.* An applicant that is a State or a unit of general local government must have a HUD-approved, complete or abbreviated, consolidated plan in accordance with 24 CFR part 91. The applicant must submit a certification that the application for funding is consistent with the HUD-approved consolidated plan(s) for the jurisdiction(s) in which the proposed project will be located. Funded applicants must certify in a grant agreement that they are following the HUD-approved consolidated plan.
( b ) *Other applicants.* Applicants that are not States or units of general local government must submit a certification by the jurisdiction(s) in which the proposed project will be located that the applicant's application for funding is consistent with the jurisdiction's HUD-approved consolidated plan. The certification must be made by the unit of general local government or the State, in accordance with the consistency certification provisions under 24 CFR part 91, subpart F. If the jurisdiction refuses to provide a certification of consistency, the applicant may appeal to HUD under § 578.35.
( c ) *Timing of consolidated plan certification submissions.* The required certification that the application for funding is consistent with the HUD-approved consolidated plan must be submitted by the funding application submission deadline announced in the NOFA.
### §30308. Nonapplication

(a) State Law.—This chapter does not affect the law of a State regulating the right to recover for death.

(b) Internal Waters.—This chapter does not apply to the Great Lakes or waters within the territorial limits of a State.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1512.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 30308 | 46 App.:767. | Mar. 30, 1920, ch. 111, §7, 41 Stat. 538. |

Section

In subsection (a), the words "law of a State" are substituted for "any State statute" for consistency in the revised title. The words "regulating the right to recover for death" are substituted for "giving or regulating rights of action or remedies for death" to eliminate unnecessary words.

In subsection (b), the words "or to any navigable waters in the Panama Canal Zone" are omitted because the Panama Canal Zone was transferred to the Republic of Panama.
LM- 9%

srallon Toland sch

Fe

|
|

-124%00' 00"
38°00’ 00" pe

\ 23" 84907 Lit / Lv esses ”

Ne

37°54’ 00Y

z fa

2

y

ANS

wanes

Spt

37° 48’ 00".

#

\ 4\

37° 42’ 00"

37° 36° 00”

i
&

~123°24' 00”

623°00' 00”

KAR

-Y:

ws .
Ce.
% SS

A
Se

ge

y
‘

<

»,

v5

S

<= oy

UN Fz
ES 1c

Dy ~ x

«

ee as

ue

123954" 5)

=
)

) fF eA
DT Andee a6

EU

a

Ce

N
«

38°00’ 00”

37°54’ 00"

37°48’ 00”

37°42’ 00"

1
37% 36’ 00”

FARALLON ISLANDS N375123W

_ SCALE 1:100,000

pros MULTIBEAM SURVEYS L468
‘contours in corrected meters

37° 30°00

-123*00’ 00”
SANTA ROSA ISLAND QUADRANGLE
CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA. CO. ie
1:100 000-SCALE SERIES (PLANIMETRIC)

ISN

-

NS

~

: . _ 70 [1150 “ . 1
y S
S
y fi n y
‘ ;
3 eS |
_————, ‘ 7

pee

G

Lp,

UYU GFE

8,
|| O98Ue -X-066

Sy
oO

of
e +

vo ronereeyei!
aIe@-11

KARIN SNIMWHO |

:/

"a0"

|
| 9e9

|
|
|

| HSSINNN ONIMVEC |

|

ONIMWwHa |

| HasWON

|
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICK BRENNAN, ET AL.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C 08-05360 JCS

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service

of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been

delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the

calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 5, 2010 __________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05360-JCS Document 61 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 1
### §621. Subjection of lands in State irrigation district to State laws generally

When in any State of the United States under the irrigation district laws of said State there has, prior to August 11, 1916, been organized and created or shall thereafter be organized and created any irrigation district for the purpose of irrigating the lands situated within said irrigation district, and in which irrigation district so created or to be created there shall be included any of the public lands of the United States, such public lands so situated in said irrigation district, when subject to entry, and entered lands within said irrigation district, for which no final certificates have been issued, which may be designated by the Secretary of the Interior in the approval by him of the map and plat of an irrigation district as provided in section 623 of this title, are made and declared to be subject to all the provisions of the laws of the State in which such lands shall be situated relating to the organization, government, and regulation of irrigation districts for the reclamation and irrigation of arid lands for agricultural purposes, to the same extent and in the same manner in which the lands of a like character held under private ownership are or may be subject to said laws: Provided, That the United States and all persons legally holding unpatented lands under entry made under the public land laws of the United States are accorded all the rights, privileges, benefits, and exemptions given by said State laws to persons holding lands of a like character under private ownership except as in this chapter otherwise provided: Provided further, That this chapter shall not apply to any irrigation district comprising a majority acreage of unentered land.

(Aug. 11, 1916, ch. 319, §1, 39 Stat. 506.)
§ 1000.426 How does HUD review a guarantee application? The procedure for review of a guarantee application includes the following steps: ( a ) HUD will review the application for compliance with title VI of NAHASDA and these implementing regulations.
( b ) HUD will accept the certifications submitted with the application. HUD may, however, consider relevant information that challenges the certifications and require additional information or assurances from the applicant as warranted by such information.
### §1720. Coordination by Secretary of the Interior with State and local governments

At least sixty days prior to offering for sale or otherwise conveying public lands under this Act, the Secretary shall notify the Governor of the State within which such lands are located and the head of the governing body of any political subdivision of the State having zoning or other land use regulatory jurisdiction in the geographical area within which such lands are located, in order to afford the appropriate body the opportunity to zone or otherwise regulate, or change or amend existing zoning or other regulations concerning the use of such lands prior to such conveyance. The Secretary shall also promptly notify such public officials of the issuance of the patent or other document of conveyance for such lands.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title II, §210, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2758.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 94–579, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2743, known as the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
§ 811.107 Financing documents and data. ( a ) The financing agency shall assure that any official statement or prospectus or other disclosure statement prepared in connection with the financing shall state on the first page that: ( 1 ) In addition to any security cited in the statement, the bonds may be secured by a pledge of an Annual Contributions Contract and a Housing Assistance Payments Contract, executed by HUD;
( 2 ) The faith of the United States is solemnly pledged to the payment of annual contributions pursuant to the Annual Contributions Contact or to the payment of housing assistance payments pursuant to the Housing Assistance Payments Contract, and funds have been obligated by HUD for such payments;
( 3 ) Except as provided in any contract of mortgage insurance, the bonds are not insured by HUD;
( 4 ) The bonds are not to be construed as a debt or indebtedness of HUD or the United States, and payment of the bonds is not guaranteed by the United States;
( 5 ) Nothing in the text of a disclosure statement is to be interpreted to conflict with the above; and
( 6 ) HUD has not reviewed or approved and bears no responsibility for the content of disclosure statements.
( b ) The financing agency shall retain in its files the documentation relating to the financing. A copy of this documentation shall be furnished to HUD upon request.
[61 FR 14461, Apr. 1, 1996]
### §126. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section, act Dec. 15, 1921, ch. 1, §1, 42 Stat. 328, abolished offices of Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of Mediation and Conciliation.
#### § 232.875 Maximum claim period.

Notice of intention to file claim on a form prescribed by the Commissioner shall be filed within 45 days after the lender becomes eligible for the benefits of the loan insurance, or within such later time as may be agreed upon by the Commissioner in writing.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3151 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3151

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
exclusion of benzodiazepines from required coverage under the Medicare 
                       prescription drug program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Ramstad) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
exclusion of benzodiazepines from required coverage under the Medicare 
                       prescription drug program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION OF BENZODIAZEPINES FROM REQUIRED 
              COVERAGE UNDER THE MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-2(e)(2) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(e)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``subparagraph (E)'' and inserting 
        ``subparagraphs (E) and (J)''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and benzodiazepines'' after ``smoking 
        cessation agents''.
    (b) Review of Benzodiazepine Prescription Policies to Assure 
Appropriateness and to Avoid Abuse.--The Secretary of Health and Human 
Services shall review the policies of medicare prescription drug plans 
(and MA-PD plans) under parts C and D of title XVIII of the Social 
Security Act regarding the filling of prescriptions for benzodiazepine 
to ensure that these policies are consistent with accepted clinical 
guidelines, are appropriate to individual health histories, and are 
designed to minimize long term use, guard against over-prescribing, and 
prevent patient abuse.
    (c) Development by Medicare Quality Improvement Organizations of 
Educational Guidelines for Physicians Regarding Prescribing of 
Benzodiazepines.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
provide, in contracts entered into with medicare quality improvement 
organizations under part B of title XI of the Social Security Act, for 
the development by such organizations of appropriate educational 
guidelines for physicians regarding the prescribing of benzodiazepines.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall be 
effective as if included in the enactment of the Medicare Prescription 
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173).
                                 <all>
```
### §106. Documented vessel

In this title, the term "documented vessel" means a vessel for which a certificate of documentation has been issued under chapter 121 of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–304, §4, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1486.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 106 | 46:2101(10). | |

Section
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FalconTarget,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

(a) the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

FalconTarget, Inc.

Date: September 22, 2006

By:   /s/   Thomas Kirchner

Thomas Kirchner

Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### Aeromagnetic Survey of Taylor Mountains Area in Southwest Alaska, A Website for the Distribution of Data

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds224

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
### §421. Acquisition of lands for irrigation project; eminent domain

Where, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, it becomes necessary to acquire any rights or property, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire the same for the United States by purchase or by condemnation under judicial process, and to pay from the reclamation fund the sums which may be needed for that purpose, and it shall be the duty of the Attorney General of the United States upon every application of the Secretary of the Interior, under this Act, to cause proceedings to be commenced for condemnation within thirty days from the receipt of the application at the Department of Justice.

(June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, §7, 32 Stat. 389.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this Title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Section as Unaffected by Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified, or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

MICHAEL A. CABOTAJE, CSBN 197086

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8957

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: michael.cabotaje@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ALLISON C. PIERCE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. 3:09-CV-02713-JSW

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for responding to Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 18) be extended from February 12, 2010, to March 14, 2010. 

This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. 

Defendant needs the additional time to further review the file and prepare a response in this matter as,

due to workloads, this case was recently assigned to a new attorney.

///

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-02713-JSW Document 22 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-02713-JSW Document21 Filed02/02/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 2, 2010 /s/ Ian M. Sammis*

(* As authorized via fax dated February 2, 2010)

IAN M. SAMMIS

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: February 2, 2010 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

/s/ Michael A. Cabotaje

MICHAEL A. CABOTAJE

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: _________________ __________________________________

THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Judge

2

Case3:09-cv-02713-JSW Document21 Filed02/02/10 Page2 of 2

February 3, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02713-JSW Document 22 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 2
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

XI'. Jrurrse W. '8ltherspoon 

Dlstriot Attorney 

69th Dietriot 

Rereford, Taxes 

Dear ILIT. '?,'ithersgoon: 

Your requee 

whether or not property p 

Risk Insuranoe "01 

this office. 

proceed6 or e ‘t;rs 

een received by 

tion to this d 

iionorable F. G 

ney Of ::ihlm coune identioel quesn ~68 rendered by 

orney Oenaral, 

ldenoee much research end 

entirely conour. 

y benetiolsrp with runds reGovernment 68 oompeneation 

on of the 6ervioe and death 

er,Ss not exempt rr0m tbxstion. The 

hds being sui jurls the Zederel Governsuoh fund8 through subsequent mutation6 

tl preeerve them to the benetiolary, 

ncloslng herewith 6 copy Of the bbove mentioned opinion rendsrod by F. 0. IdoKinsey. 

'!3usting that this 6nswers your inquiry, i remain 

Your8 very truly
### §5425. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–569, title VI, §611(1), Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 3012

Section, Pub. L. 93–383, title VI, §626, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 714; Pub. L. 95–557, title IX, §901, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2124; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §308(c)(4), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1641; Pub. L. 97–35, title III, §339B(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 417, related to reports to Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Dec. 27, 2000, except that repeal has no effect on any order or interpretative bulletin issued under this chapter and published as a proposed rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 on or before Dec. 27, 2000, see section 612 of Pub. L. 106–569, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendment note under section 5401 of this title.