alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§6029, 6030. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–402, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1737

Section 6029, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §129, as added Pub. L. 98–527, §2, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2678; amended Pub. L. 103–230, title II, §211, Apr. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 313, related to appeals by States.

Section 6030, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §130, as added Pub. L. 98–527, §2, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2679; amended Pub. L. 100–146, title II, §208, Oct. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 851; Pub. L. 101–496, §14, Oct. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 1198; Pub. L. 103–230, title II, §212, Apr. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 313; Pub. L. 104–183, §2, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1694, authorized appropriations.

Prior sections 6031 to 6033 were omitted in the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 98–527.

Section 6031, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §121, as added Pub. L. 94–103, title I, §105, Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 486; amended Pub. L. 95–602, title V, §509, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 3008, related to grants for university affiliated facilities.

Section 6032, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §122, as added Pub. L. 94–103, title I, §105, Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 487; amended Pub. L. 95–602, title V, §509, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 3009, set forth administrative provisions relating to demonstration and training grants for university affiliated facilities.

Section 6033, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §123, as added Pub. L. 94–103, title I, §105, Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 487; amended Pub. L. 95–602, title V, §509, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 3010; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §911(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 563; Pub. L. 98–221, title III, §303, Feb. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 35, authorized appropriations for demonstration and training grants for university affiliated facilities.
#### § 3286.407 Supervising work of crew.

The installer will be responsible for the work performed by each person engaged to perform installation tasks on a manufactured home, in accordance with the HUD-administered installation program.
Exhibit 31.3**CERTIFICATIONS**I, David R. White, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of IASIS Healthcare LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:January 28, 2008                                                                      /s/ David R. White   David R. White   Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer
### §§270–5 to 270–10. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 270–5, act Apr. 29, 1950, ch. 137, §2, 64 Stat. 95, required filing of notice of location of settlement claims for public lands in Alaska. Section was formerly classified to section 371a of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Section 270–6, act Apr. 29, 1950, ch. 137, §3, 64 Stat. 95, set forth effects of failure to file notice of settlement claim. Section was formerly classified to section 371b of Title 48.

Section 270–7, acts Apr. 29, 1950, ch. 137, §4, 64 Stat. 95; July 11, 1956, ch. 571, §2, 70 Stat. 529, required final or commutation proof on unsurveyed land as basis for free survey. Section was formerly classified to section 371c of Title 48.

Section 270–8, acts July 8, 1916, ch. 228, §1, 39 Stat. 352; June 28, 1918, ch. 110, 40 Stat. 632, set forth the amount of homestead entries for every qualified person. Section was formerly classified to section 373 of Title 48.

Section 270–9, acts July 8, 1916, ch. 228, §1, 39 Stat. 352; June 28, 1918, ch. 110, 40 Stat. 632, removed bar of former entry in any other State or Territory as bar to homestead entry in Alaska. Section was formerly classified to section 374 of Title 48.

Section 270–10, act July 8, 1916, ch. 228, §2, as added June 28, 1918, ch. 110, 40 Stat. 633; amended Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1144; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100; July 11, 1956, ch. 571, §1, 70 Stat. 528, set forth requirements for entry on unsurveyed lands. Section was formerly classified to section 375 of Title 48.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

s0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

137584 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137584 

 COA: 283797 

Kalamazoo CC: 02-001916-FC 

JEFFREY ALLEN RURKA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### **CHAPTER 503—ADMINISTRATIVE**

Sec.
50301.
Vessel Operations Revolving Fund.
50302.
Port development.
50303.
Operating property and extending term of notes.
50304.
Sale and transfer of property.
50305.
Appointment of trustee or receiver and operation of vessels.
50306.
Requiring testimony and records in investigations.
50307.
Maritime environmental and technical assistance program.
50308.
Maritime transportation system emergency relief program.
50309.
Securing logistics information data of the United States.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2023**—Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title VIII, §825(b)(2), div. C, title XXXV, §3514(c), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 333, 810, substituted "Maritime transportation system emergency relief program" for "Port development; maritime transportation system emergency relief program" in item 50308 and added item 50309.

**2021**—Pub. L. 116–283, div. C, title XXXV, §3505(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4405, added item 50308.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–213, title IV, §403(b), Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1570, added item 50307.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

SEPT 19, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-14958

 

D. C. Docket No. 05-00102 CV-WCO-2

KIMARA DEWBERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GILMER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

RAIFORD CANTRELL,

Superintendent of Gilmer County School District,

in his official capacity, 

ALEXANDER B. RAINEY,

former Superintendent of Gilmer County School

District, in his individual capacity,

SANDRA DAVENPORT,

Principal of Ellijay Primary School, in her

official and individual capacity,

CHARME HARMON,

Principal of Ellijay Elementary School, in her

official and individual capacity, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.
Martin was the GCSD personnel director from April 1999 through January 2004; Harmon 1

and Davenport are principals at GCSD elementary schools; Rainey was the GCSD superintendent

from December 1998 through December 2004; Cantrell is the current GCSD superintendent.

2

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

 

(September 19, 2008)

Before DUBINA, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Kimara Dewberry (“Dewberry”) appeals the district court’s grant

of summary judgment in favor of Appellees Gilmer County School District

(“GCSD”), Raiford Cantrell, Alexander B. Rainey, Sandra Davenport, Charme

Harmon, and Julie Martin on her race discrimination claims brought under 42 1

U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17.

“We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment, viewing

all the evidence, and drawing all reasonable inferences, in favor of the nonmoving party.” Allstate Life Ins. Co. v. Miller, 424 F.3d 1113, 1115 (11th Cir.

2005).

After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the

benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment
3

in favor of the Appellees because Dewberry fails to show that the reasons given by

the Appellees for hiring Payton, Parks, Young, or Watkins were a mere pretext for

discrimination.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, as filed wit the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
March 31, 2008

|/s/ David M. ObstlerDavid M. Obstler (Principal Financial Officer) |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### § 320.9 Pool administration.

The Association will only guarantee securities if the issuer executes a guaranty agreement or contractual agreement in the form prescribed by the Association. Pool administration requirements are set forth in such agreements or the applicable MBS Guide.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 2503-0003, 2503-0004, 2503-0006, 2503-0007, and 2503-0026)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3217

To suspend temporarily the duty on DCBTF. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on DCBTF.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DCBTF. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.02 3,4-Dichlorobenztrifluoride 

(CAS No. 328–84–7) (provided for in subheading 

2903.69.08) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 3217 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### **CHAPTER 20—NORTHEAST RAIL SERVICE**

Sec.
1101.
Congressional findings and declarations.
1102.
Statement of purpose.
1103.
Goals and objectives.
1104.
Definitions.
1105.
Judicial review.
1106.
Exemption from transfer taxes and fees; recordation.
1107.
Repealed.
1108.
Concerted economic action.
1109.
Effectuation of cost reductions.
1110, 1111. Repealed.
1112.
Interstate Commerce Commission proceedings.
1113.
Intercity passenger service.
1114.
Repealed.
1115.
Redemption of stock.
1116.
Applicability of other laws.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-4722

GILDARDO CORTEZ, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.

Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge.

(CR-96-63-V)

Submitted: October 20, 1998

Decided: April 21, 1999

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Randolph Marshall Lee, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Mark T. Calloway, United States Attorney, H. Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Gildardo Cortez, Jr., was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 846 (1994). On appeal, Cortez contends that the district court

improperly admitted evidence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 404(b), of his

marijuana dealings with two co-conspirators which occurred before

the charged conspiracy. Finding no reversible error, we affirm Cortez'

conviction.

Assuming, without deciding, that the admission of the evidence of

the co-conspirators' prior involvement with Cortez was error, any

error was harmless. After a thorough review of the record before the

court, "we . . . can say `with fair assurance, after pondering all that

happened without stripping the erroneous action from the whole, that

the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error.'" United

States v. Ince, 21 F.3d 576, 583 (4th Cir. 1994) (quoting Kotteakos

v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 (1946)). In addition, although

Cortez then challenges the evidence on the grounds that it was circumstantial and turned on the credibility of witnesses, we may not

weigh the evidence or review the credibility of the witnesses. See

United States v. Wilson, 118 F.3d 228, 234 (4th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, we affirm Cortez' conviction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
### SUBCHAPTER XIX—NUECES RIVER PROJECT, TEXAS
Exhibit 32.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                 SECTION 1350 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of WORLDTEK CORP. hereby certifies, to the best of his
 knowledge that:

1.       The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A-1 of the Company, for
         the annual period ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  August 25, 2004
                                                     /s/ Bernard Artz
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Bernard Artz
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4411 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4411

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain polyacrylonitrile 
                                  tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary reduction of duty on certain polyacrylonitrile 
                                  tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN POLYACRYLONITRILE TOW.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.22 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to polyacrylonitrile tow) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §7625a. Statutory construction

The parenthetical cross references in any provision of this chapter to other provisions of the chapter, or other provisions of law, where the words "relating to" or "pertaining to" are used, are made only for convenience, and shall be given no legal effect.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §326, as added Pub. L. 95–190, §14(a)(84), Nov. 16, 1977, 91 Stat. 1404; renumbered §325, Pub. L. 96–300, §1(c), July 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 831; renumbered §326, Pub. L. 98–213, §11, Dec. 8, 1983, 97 Stat. 1461.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 326 of act July 14, 1955, was renumbered section 327 by Pub. L. 98–213 and is classified to section 7626 of this title.
### §57. Who included in term "common carrier"

The term "common carrier" as used in this chapter shall include the receiver or receivers or other persons or corporations charged with the duty of the management and operation of the business of a common carrier.

(Apr. 22, 1908, ch. 149, §7, 35 Stat. 66.)
### §§616ss to 616vv–5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616ss, Pub. L. 88–599, §1, Sept. 18, 1964, 78 Stat. 955, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Whitestone Coulee unit of Okanogan-Similkameen division of Chief Joseph Dam project, Washington.

Section 616tt, Pub. L. 88–599, §2, Sept. 18, 1964, 78 Stat. 955, provided that section 2 of the act July 27, 1954 (68 Stat. 568, 569) apply to this unit.

Section 616uu, Pub. L. 88–599, §3, Sept. 18, 1964, 78 Stat. 955, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities in connection with this unit and allocated costs for conservation of fish and wildlife.

Section 616vv, Pub. L. 88–599, §4, Sept. 18, 1964, 78 Stat. 956, authorized appropriations for this unit.

Section 616vv–1, Pub. L. 89–557, §1, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 704, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Manson unit, Chelan division, Chief Joseph Dam project, Washington.

Section 616vv–2, Pub. L. 89–557, §2, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 704, related to irrigation repayment contracts and period for repayment and charges for power and energy for irrigation water pumping.

Section 616vv–3, Pub. L. 89–557, §3, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 704, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife and enhancement of recreational facilities in connection with this unit.

Section 616vv–4, Pub. L. 89–557, §4, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 704, related to restriction on delivery of water for production of excessive basic commodities.

Section 616vv–5, Pub. L. 89–557, §5, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 705, authorized appropriations for this unit.
§ 26.22 Requests for admissions. ( a ) Any party may serve upon any other party a written request for the admission of the genuineness of any relevant documents described in the request or of the truth of any relevant matters of fact. Copies of documents shall be delivered with the request unless copies have already been furnished. Each requested admission shall be considered admitted, unless within 30 days after service of the request, or within such other time as the parties may agree, or the hearing officer determines, the party from whom the admission is sought serves upon the party making the request either: ( 1 ) A statement that: ( i ) Denies specifically the relevant matters for which an admission is requested, or sets forth in detail the reasons why the party can neither truthfully admit nor deny them;
( ii ) Fairly meets the substance of the requested admission and, when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, specifies as much of it as is true and qualifies or denies the remainder; and
( iii ) Does not assert lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny, unless the party states that the party has made reasonable inquiry, and that the information known or readily obtainable by the party is insufficient to enable the party to admit or deny; or
( 2 ) Written objections to a requested admission that: ( i ) State the grounds for the objection; and
( ii ) Object to a requested admission, if necessary, either in whole or in part, on the basis of privilege or relevance.
( b ) Responses to the request for admission on matters to which objections have been made may be deferred until the objection is ruled upon, but if written objections are made only to a part of a request, a response to the remainder of the request shall be provided.
( c ) Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the hearing officer, on motion, permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Admissions obtained pursuant to this procedure may be used in evidence only for the purposes of the pending action. The use of obtained admissions as evidence is permitted to the same extent and subject to the same objections as other evidence.
§ 248.401 Purposes. The purposes of this subpart are: ( a ) To promote the ability of residents of eligible low income housing to participate meaningfully in the preservation process established by this part and affect decisions about the future of their housing;
( b ) To promote the ability of community-based nonprofit organizations and resident councils to acquire, rehabilitate, and competently own and manage eligible housing as rental or cooperative housing for low and moderate income people; and
( c ) To assist the Commissioner in discharging the obligation under § 248.157(b) to notify potential qualified purchasers of the availability of projects for sale and to otherwise facilitate the coordination and oversight of the preservation program established under this part.