alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3049 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 336
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3049

                          [Report No. 109-585]

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known as 
the Lacey Act, to add certain species of carp to the list of injurious 
      species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 23, 2005

    Mr. Green of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             July 20, 2006

Additional sponsors: Mr. Stupak, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Kennedy 
 of Minnesota, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Kline, Mr. Evans, Mr. Conyers, Mr. 
             Kirk, Mr. Emanuel, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Petri

                             July 20, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known as 
the Lacey Act, to add certain species of carp to the list of injurious 
      species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Asian Carp Prevention and Control 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITION OF SPECIES OF CARP TO THE LIST OF INJURIOUS SPECIES 
              THAT ARE PROHIBITED FROM BEING IMPORTED OR SHIPPED.

    Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``Dreissena polymorpha;'' the following: ``of the black 
carp of the species Mylopharyngodon piceus; of the bighead carp of the 
species Hypophthalmichthys nobilis; of the silver carp of the species 
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix; of the largescale silver carp of the 
species Hypophthalmichthys harmandi;''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 336

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3049

                          [Report No. 109-585]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known as 
the Lacey Act, to add certain species of carp to the list of injurious 
      species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 20, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
§ 207.256b Modification of mortgage terms. ( a ) The mortgagor and the mortgagee may, with the approval of the Commissioner, enter into an agreement that extends the time for curing a default under the mortgage or modifies the payment terms of the mortgage.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2), the Commissioner's approval of the type of agreement specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall not be given, unless the mortgagor agrees in writing that, during such period as the mortgage continues to be in default, and payments by the mortgagor to the mortgagee are less than the amounts required under the terms of the original mortgage, the mortgagor or mortgagee, as may be appropriate in the particular situation, will hold in trust for disposition, as directed by the Commissioner, all rents or other funds derived from the secured property that are not required to meet actual and necessary expenses arising in connection with the operation of such property, including amortization charges, under the mortgage.
( 2 ) For multifamily project mortgages for which HUD issued a firm commitment for mortgage insurance before September 1, 2011, and for multifamily project mortgages insured under section 232 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1715w), and section 242 (12 U.S.C. 1715z-7), the Commissioner's approval of the type of agreement specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall not be given unless the mortgagor agrees in writing that, during such period as payments to the mortgagee are less than the amounts required under the terms of the original mortgage, the mortgagor will hold in trust for disposition as directed by the Commissioner all rents or other funds derived from the property which are not required to meet actual and necessary expenses arising in connection with the operation of such property, including amortization charges, under the mortgage.
( 3 ) For multifamily project mortgages for which HUD issued a firm commitment for mortgage insurance on or after September 1, 2011, the regulations of paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall apply, unless the mortgagor demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that financial hardship to the mortgagor would result from application of the regulations in paragraph (b)(1) of this section due to the reasonable expectations of the mortgagor that the transaction would close under the regulations in effect prior to September 1, 2011, in which case, the regulations of paragraph (b)(2) shall apply.
( c ) The Commissioner may exempt a mortgagor from the requirement of paragraph (b) of this section in any case where the Commissioner determines that such exemption does not jeopardize the interests of the United States.
[76 FR 24370, May 2, 2011]
#### GOETSCHIUS, Respondent, v. HARLAM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Joba H. Goetschius against Edward H. Harlam. D. McCurdy, for appellant. W. R. Adams, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32


                              THINKING TOOLS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinking Tools, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"),
the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: February 12, 2004
                                          By: Moshe Zarmi
                                              -----------------------
                                          Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                          Title: President and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer and
                                                 principal accounting officer
### §§616nnn to 616sss. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616nnn, Pub. L. 89–596, §1, Sept. 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 822, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Tualatin project, Oregon.

Section 616ooo, Pub. L. 89–596, §2, Sept. 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 822, related to irrigation repayment contracts, period of repayment, and charges for power and energy.

Section 616ppp, Pub. L. 89–596, §3, Sept. 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 822, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife and enhancement of recreational facilities in connection with this project.

Section 616qqq, Pub. L. 89–596, §4, Sept. 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 822, related to repayment of project costs.

Section 616rrr, Pub. L. 89–596, §5, Sept. 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 823, related to restriction on delivery of water for production of excessive basic commodities.

Section 616sss, Pub. L. 89–596, §6, Sept. 20, 1966, 80 Stat. 823, authorized appropriations for this project.
§ 291.510 Overview of the GNND Sales Program. ( a ) *General.* The GNND Sales Program enables a full-time law enforcement officer, teacher, or firefighter/emergency medical technician to purchase a specifically designated HUD-acquired home located in a HUD-designated revitalization area: ( 1 ) At a 50 percent discount from the list price; and
( 2 ) With a downpayment of $100, but only if the law enforcement officer, teacher, or firefighter/emergency medical technician finances the home through a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured mortgage.
( b ) *Eligible properties.* Under the GNND Sales Program, single-unit properties acquired by HUD located in HUD-designated revitalization areas (except occupied properties, those located in Asset Control Areas, or those that HUD has determined will be sold through an alternative sales method) will be made available to interested law enforcement officers, teachers, and firefighters/emergency medical technicians prior to listing the properties for sale to other purchasers.
( c ) *Multiple bids.* In the event that several bids are received on a single property, HUD will randomly select a winning offer by lottery and will also randomly select two backup bids, to be utilized in the order selected, in the event the winning purchaser is unable to close on the property. If both of the backup purchasers are also unable to close on the property, the property will then be made available for sale to purchasers through other sales methods.
( d ) *Real estate brokers.* Law enforcement officers, teachers, and firefighters/emergency medical technicians must submit bids through a participating real estate broker. Any real estate broker who has agreed to comply with HUD requirements may participate in the GNND Sales Program. Real estate brokers may submit unlimited numbers of bids on an individual property provided each bid is from a different prospective purchaser.
( e ) *Cap on sales.* The number of HUD-acquired homes sold under the GNND Sales Program in a fiscal year shall not exceed 5 percent of the number of “Part A” mortgage insurance conveyance claims paid by HUD in the prior fiscal year. The cap shall apply on a national basis, but HUD reserves the right to geographically apportion the cap to address regional or local differences in the number of homes sold through the GNND Sales Program. Additionally, HUD may adjust the percentage of the cap for any fiscal year. Any HUD determination to geographically distribute the cap, change a current geographic distribution, or adjust the percentage of the cap will be announced by HUD through publication of a notice in the Federal Register at least 30 days before the revision takes effect.
[71 FR 64426, Nov. 1, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 1974, Jan. 11, 2008]
#### § 1429.11 Interlocutory appeals.

The Board and the General Counsel ordinarily will not consider interlocutory appeals.
### §§3811 to 3814. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Appropriations for this part have not been authorized for fiscal years after 1975.

Section 3811, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §101, as added Pub. L. 92–381, §1, Aug. 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 532; amended Pub. L. 93–415, title IV, §401(3), Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1132, set out Congressional statement of purpose for community-based coordinated youth services.

A prior section 3811, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §101, July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 463, related to Secretary's authority to make grants for State and local planning, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 90–445 by section 1 of Pub. L. 92–381.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior sections 3821 and 3831, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §§111, 121, July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 463, 465, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 90–445 by section 1 of Pub. L. 92–381.

Title IV of Pub. L. 93–415 was repealed by Pub. L. 95–115, §10, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1061, and Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12221(a)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1894.

Section 3812, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §102, as added Pub. L. 92–381, §1, Aug. 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 532; amended Pub. L. 93–415, title IV, §401(3), Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1132, related to grants for planning community-based programs.

A prior section 3812, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §102, July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 463, related to grants for planning projects or programs, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 90–445 by section 1 of Pub. L. 92–381.

Provisions similar to those comprising subsec. (b) of this section were contained in prior sections 3822, 3823, 3832, 3833, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §§112, 113, 122, 123, July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 464, 465, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 90–445 by section 1 of Pub. L. 92–381.

Title IV of Pub. L. 93–415 was repealed by Pub. L. 95–115, §10, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1061, and Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12221(a)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1894.

Section 3813, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §103, as added Pub. L. 92–381, §1, Aug. 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 533; amended Pub. L. 93–415, title IV, §401(3), Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1132, related to use of funds for community-based youth services.

Provisions similar to those comprising this section were contained in prior section 3843, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §133, July 31, 1968, 82 Stat. 468, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 90–445 by section 1 of Pub. L. 92–381.

Title IV of Pub. L. 93–415 was repealed by Pub. L. 95–115, §10, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1061, and Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12221(a)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1894.

Section 3814, Pub. L. 90–445, title I, §104, as added Pub. L. 92–381, §1, Aug. 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 534; amended Pub. L. 93–415, title IV, §401(3), Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1132, related to considerations in the approval of applications for grants or contracts involving community-based youth services.

Title IV of Pub. L. 93–415 was repealed by Pub. L. 95–115, §10, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1061, and Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title II, §12221(a)(4), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1894.
#### § 203.608 Reinstatement.

The mortgagee shall permit reinstatement of a mortgage, even after the institution of foreclosure proceedings, if the mortgagor tenders in a lump sum all amounts required to bring the account current, including foreclosure costs and reasonable attorney's fees and expenses properly associated with the foreclosure action, unless: (a) The mortgagee has accepted reinstatement after the institution of foreclosure proceedings within two years immediately preceding the commencement of the current foreclosure action, (b) reinstatement will preclude foreclosure following a subsequent default, or (c) reinstatement will adversely affect the priority of the mortgage lien.
Exhibit 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Eastern Light Capital, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Wrensen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and I, Andrea
Barney, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully compiles with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: August 11, 2009
                                   /s/ Richard J. Wrensen
                                   ----------------------
                                   Richard J. Wrensen
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer


                                   /s/ Andrea Barney
                                   -----------------
                                   Andrea Barney
                                   Principal Accounting Officer and Controller
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00191-CR

JULIUS STEWART,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. 33487, 33854, 33855, 33907, 33983

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Julius Stewart has filed an interlocutory pro se notice of appeal of the denial of 

his motion to recuse the trial judge.

We do not have jurisdiction of this interlocutory appeal of the denial of the 

motion to recuse. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (standard 

for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, but whether 

appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, 

no pet.) (stating that court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly 
Stewart v. State Page 2

granted by law). No law authorizes the interlocutory appeal of a denial of a motion to 

recuse.

We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 20, 2012

Do not publish

[CR25]
§ 50.1 Definitions. The following definitions shall be applicable to this part: ( a ) *United States* means the continental United States, the State of Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, the Canal Zone, American Samoa, Guam and any other islands or territory over which the United States exercises jurisdiction.
( b ) *Department* means the Department of State of the United States of America.
( c ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of State.
( d ) *National* means a citizen of the United States or a noncitizen owing permanent allegiance to the United States.
( e ) *Passport* means a travel document issued under the authority of the Secretary of State attesting to the identity and nationality of the bearer.
( f ) *Passport Agent* means a person designated by the Department to accept passport applications.
( g ) *Designated nationality examiner* means a United States citizen employee of the Department of State assigned or employed abroad (permanently or temporarily) and designated by the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Overseas Citizen Services, to grant, issue and verify U.S. passports. A designated nationality examiner may adjudicate claims of acquisition and loss of United States nationality and citizenship as required for the purpose of providing passport and related services. The authority of designated nationality examiners shall include the authority to examine, adjudicate, approve and deny passport applications and applications for related services. The authority of designated nationality examiners shall expire upon termination of the employee's assignment for such duty and may also be terminated at any time by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Overseas Citizen Services.
[31 FR 13537, Oct. 20, 1966, as amended at 31 FR 14521, Nov. 11, 1966; 61 FR 43311, Aug. 22, 1996]
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the amendment
      to the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig A. Zabala, as acting Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:May
              8, 2006/s/ Craig
              A.
              ZabalaCraig
                A. Zabala
              Acting
                Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




15
§ 3280.8 Waivers. ( a ) Where any material piece of equipment, or system which does not meet precise requirements or specifications set out in the standard is shown, to the satisfaction of the Secretary, to meet an equivalent level of performance, the Secretary may waive the specifications set out in the Standard for that material, piece of equipment, or system.
( b ) Where the Secretary is considering issuing a waiver to a Standard, the proposed waiver shall be published in the Federal Register for public comment, unless the Secretary, for good cause, finds that notice is impractical, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates into the waiver that finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor.
( c ) Each proposed and final waiver shall include: ( 1 ) A statement of the nature of the waiver; and
( 2 ) Identification of the particular standard affected.
( d ) All waivers shall be published in the Federal Register and shall state their effective date. Where a waiver has been issued, the requirements of the Federal Standard to which the waiver relates may be met either by meeting the specifications set out in the Standard or by meeting the requirements of the waiver published in the Federal Register.
[58 FR 55003, Oct. 25, 1993]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

281Additionally, CMS has filed a surreply, to which TBIC has responded with a motion

to strike.

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CMS SECURITY, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

    v.

THE BURLINGTON INSURANCECOMPANY,

Defendant                                                                      /

Lead Case No. C-09-2216 MMCCase No. C-09-2217 MMC

ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 19, 2010HEARING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONFOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before the Court is defendant The Burlington Insurance Company’s (“TBIC”) Motion

for Summary Judgment, filed January 13, 2010.  Plaintiffs CMS Security, Inc. and Everal

Thompson (collectively, “CMS”) have filed opposition, to which TBIC has replied.1  Having

read and considered the parties’ respective filings, the Court hereby deems the matter

suitable for decision thereon, and VACATES the hearing scheduled for February 19, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 17, 2010                                                             MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02216-MMC   Document 24   Filed 02/17/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T07:34:49-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO