alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§9861, 9862. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(w), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4025

Section 9861, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §662, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 508; Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §202, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1243, authorized financial assistance for Follow Through programs.

Section 9862, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §663, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §203, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1244; amended Pub. L. 102–119, §26(c), Oct. 7, 1991, 105 Stat. 607, related to consideration of applications.

A prior section 9862, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §663, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 509; Pub. L. 98–558, title III, §301, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2887; Pub. L. 99–425, title II, §201(a), Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 966, related to funding requirements, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §203, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1244.
#### § 15.303 Procedure for review of demands for production of material or provision of testimony in any legal proceeding in which the United States is a party.

Whenever a demand is made upon the Department or an employee of the Department for the production of material or provision of testimony, the employee shall immediately notify the Appropriate Associate General Counsel or Appropriate Regional Counsel.

[73 FR 72207, Nov. 26, 2008]
### §724. Memorial addresses: illustrations

The illustrations to accompany bound copies of memorial addresses delivered in Congress shall be made at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and paid for out of the appropriation for that bureau, or, in the discretion of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be obtained elsewhere by the Director of the Government Publishing Office and charged to the allotment for printing and binding for Congress.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1252; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §152 (Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, §1, 41 Stat. 1431).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6069

RANDY L. THORNTON,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, 

District Judge. (5:10-hc-02023-D)

Submitted: May 16, 2011 Decided: May 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy L. Thornton, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Thornton, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition and has moved for appointment 

of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we deny Thornton’s motion for appointment 

of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Thornton v. United States, No. 5:10-hc-02023-D 

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 9, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-30244 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUSTIN E. CALLAHAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-69-B

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Justin E. Callahan, federal prisoner # 03245-095, is currently serving a 180-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Callahan requests a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to file an out-of-time 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Because Callahan’s motion did not request habeas relief, he need not obtain a COA in order to proceed on appeal. Accordingly, his request for COA is DENIED AS UNNECESSARY.No. 03-30244 -2- Callahan’s motion to file an out-of-time 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion was not accompanied by a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion on the merits. We agree with the reasoning of United States v. Leon , 203 F.3d 162 (2d Cir. 2000), and conclude “that a federal court lacks jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of a § 2255 [motion] until a [motion] is actually filed.” Id . at 163. Before the motion itself is filed, “there is no case or controversy to be heard, and any opinion we were to render on the timeliness issue would be merely advisory.” Id . Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Callahan’s motion is AFFIRMED because the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion.
COA DENIED AS UNNECESSARY; AFFIRMED.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZOE M. MOSKO,

Plaintiff(s),

    v.

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC et al,

Defendant(s).                                                                      /

No. C 09-1993 MHP

ORDER(Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on

opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the

settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be

restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: 3/9/2010MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01993-MHP   Document 28   Filed 03/09/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T04:18:37-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### §937. Filing profile of road; forfeiture of rights

Any railroad company desiring to secure the benefits of sections 934 to 939 of this title, shall, within twelve months after the location of any section of twenty miles of its road, if the same be upon surveyed lands, and, if upon unsurveyed lands, within twelve months after the survey thereof by the United States, file with the officer, as the Secretary of the Interior may designate, of the land office for the district where such land is located a profile of its road; and upon approval thereof by the Secretary of the Interior the same shall be noted upon the plats in said office; and thereafter all such lands over which such right of way shall pass shall be disposed of subject to such right of way: Provided, That if any section of said road shall not be completed within five years after the location of said section, the rights herein granted shall be forfeited as to any such uncompleted section of said road.

(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 152, §4, 18 Stat. 483; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Officer, as the Secretary of the Interior may designate" substituted for "register" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, which abolished all registers of district land offices and transferred functions of register of district land office to Secretary of the Interior. See section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
### §620c–1. Laws governing priority of appropriation

In the diversion and storage of water for any project or any parts thereof constructed under the authority of the Colorado River Basin Project Act [43 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.] or the Colorado River Storage Project Act [43 U.S.C. 620 et seq.] within and for the benefit of the State of Colorado only, the Secretary is directed to comply with the constitution and statutes of the State of Colorado relating to priority of appropriation; with State and Federal court decrees entered pursuant thereto; and with operating principles, if any, adopted by the Secretary and approved by the State of Colorado.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title V, §501(e), Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 898.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Colorado River Basin Project Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 90–537, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 885, which is classified principally to chapter 32 (§1501 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

The Colorado River Storage Project Act, referred to in text, is act Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, 70 Stat. 105, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 620 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section consists of subsec. (e) of section 501 of Pub. L. 90–537. Subsecs. (a), (b), and (d) of section 501 are classified to sections 620, 620 note, 620a, 620a–1, 620a–2, and 620k note of this title. Subsecs. (c) and (f) of section 501 are not classified to the Code.

Section was enacted as part of the Colorado River Basin Project Act, and not as part of act Apr. 11, 1956, popularly known as the Colorado River Storage Project Act, which comprises this chapter.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2966 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the availability of emergency 

medical care for veterans in non-Department of Veterans Affairs medical 

facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mr. HONDA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the availability of emergency medical care for veterans in nonDepartment of Veterans Affairs medical facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF AVAILABILITY OF EMER4 GENCY MEDICAL CARE FOR VETERANS IN 

5 NON-DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

6 MEDICAL FACILITIES. 

7 Section 1725(f)(1)(C) of title 38, United States Code, 

8 is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 

9 following: ‘‘, with the determination of whether the veteran 
2 

•HR 2966 IH 

1 can be so transferred to be based both on the condition 

2 of the veteran and on the availability of a bed in a Depart3 ment facility that is not geographically inaccessible to the 

4 veteran’’. 

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40492 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MANUEL PEREZ

- MEJIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 64

- 1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Perez

- Mejia (Perez) appeals from the judgment imposed in connection with his guilty plea conviction of being illegally present in the United States after removal. As Perez concedes, the argument he raises on appeal is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541 , 5 57, 562 & n.28 (5th Cir. (en banc), cert denied , 2013 WL 2617911 (U.S. Nov. 4, 2013) (No. 12

- 10695), in which this court concluded that the gener ic, contemporary

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec edent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 19, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40492 Document: 00512476509 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/19/2013No. 13

- 40492

definitions of “ sexual abuse of a minor” and “statutory rape” do not include an
age - differenti al requirement. Accordingly, Perez’s motion for summary affirmance i s GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-40492 Document: 00512476509 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/19/2013
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.
 1.
    
    BHMH, LLC2.
    
    Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC3.
    
    GLGB Manager III, LLC4.
    
    Grapevine Beverage, Inc.5.
    
    Great Bear Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, LLC6.
    
    Great Lakes Services, LLC7.
    
    Great Wolf Capital Trust I8.
    
    Great Wolf Connecticut, LLC9.
    
    Great Wolf Kansas SPE, LLC10.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Chehalis, LLC11.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Georgia, LLC12.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Grapevine, LLC13.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, LLC14.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of PKI, LLC15.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of the Carolinas, LLC16.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC17.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC18.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, LLC19.
    
    Great Wolf TC Development, LLC20.
    
    Great Wolf Traverse SPE, LLC21.
    
    Great Wolf Williamsburg SPE, LLC22.
    
    GW Capital Trust II23.
    
    GW Capital Trust III24.
    
    GWF Connecticut, LLC25.
    
    GWL KC Beverage, Inc.26.
    
    GWR Development Connecticut, LLC27.
    
    GWR Michigan, LLC




---



##### 



28.
    
    GWR OP General Partner, LLC29.
    
    GWR Operating Partnership, LLLP30.
    
    Knot PF, LLC31.
    
    Mason Family Resorts, LLC32.
    
    Niagara Glenview Tent & Trailer Park Company (Nova Scotia)33.
    
    Pine Brook Properties, LLC34.
    
    Poco Topo Gigio, LLC35.
    
    Williamsburg Landlord Parcel C, LLC36.
    
    Williamsburg Landlord Parcel D, LLC37.
    
    Williamsburg Meadows
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


     CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Forsyth Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
D. Foreman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                             /s/ Timothy D. Foreman
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Timothy D. Foreman, Secretary and Treasurer
                             (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

August 13, 2002


                                       18
cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge Gholamreza Zandian Jazi Reza Zandian Watson Rounds Elias Abrishami Ballard Spahr, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4210 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-588

Certain Digital Multimeters, and 

Products with Multimeter Functionality
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4210 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-588

Certain Digital Multimeters, and 

Products with Multimeter Functionality
#### § 3280.309 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75749, Sept. 16, 2024.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Patrick K. Donnelly, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofPRA International;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to statea material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to    ensure that material information relating to the registrant,    including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by    others within those entities, particularly during the period in    which this annual report is being prepared;           (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within    90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the    “Evaluation Date”); and           (c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures    based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):          (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation    of internal controls which could adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial data and have identified for the    registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal    controls; and           (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls; and     6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and Ihave indicated in this annual report whether there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.    Signature:  /s/ Patrick K. Donnelly   Name: Patrick K. Donnelly Title: Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 18, 2005
Case 3:09-cv-01832-WHA Document 29 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2
April 7, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-01832-WHA Document 29 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
### §1325. Labor Statistics, Bureau of: report of Commissioner

In addition to the usual number of the report of the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, twenty-five thousand copies shall be printed: five thousand for the Senate, ten thousand for the House of Representatives, and ten thousand for distribution by the Commissioner.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1269.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §271 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 614; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §3, 37 Stat. 737).
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128326 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128326 

 COA: 259398 

Calhoun CC: 99-000595-FH 

CONRAD LYNN BURTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 4, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
### §315m–1. Lease of State, county, or privately owned lands; period of lease; rental

The Secretary of the Interior in his discretion is authorized to lease at rates to be determined by him any State, county, or privately owned lands chiefly valuable for grazing purposes and lying within the exterior boundaries of a grazing district when, in his judgment, the leasing of such lands will promote the orderly use of the district and aid in conserving the forage resources of the public lands therein: Provided, That no such leases shall run for a period of more than ten years and in no event shall the grazing fees paid the United States for the grazing privileges on any of the lands leased under the provisions of this section be less than the rental paid by the United States for any of such lands: Provided further, That nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the appropriation of any moneys except that moneys heretofore or hereafter appropriated for construction, purchase, and maintenance of range improvements within grazing districts, pursuant to the provisions of sections 315i and 315j of this title, may be made additionally available by Congress for the leasing of land under this section and sections 315m–2 to 315m–4 of this title.

(June 23, 1938, ch. 603, §1, 52 Stat. 1033.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of act June 28, 1934, known as the Taylor Grazing Act, which comprises this subchapter.