alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3286.803 State qualifying installation programs. ( a ) *Qualifying installation program supersedes.* The HUD-administered installation program will not be implemented in any state that is identified as fully or conditionally accepted under the requirements and procedures of this subpart I or in accordance with part 3282 of this chapter.
( b ) *Minimum elements.* To be accepted as a fully qualifying installation program, a state installation program must include the following elements: ( 1 ) Installation standards that meet or exceed the requirements of § 3286.107(a) and that apply to every initial installation of a new manufactured home within the state;
( 2 ) The training of manufactured home installers;
( 3 ) The licensing of, or other method of certifying or approving, manufactured home installers to perform the initial installations of new manufactured homes in the state;
( 4 ) A method for inspecting the initial installations of new manufactured homes in the state that is implemented and used to hold installers responsible for the work they perform; and
( 5 ) Provision of adequate funding and personnel to administer the state installation program.
( c ) *Conditional acceptance.* ( 1 ) A state installation program that meets the minimum requirements set forth under paragraphs (b)(1), (4), and (5) of this section may be conditionally accepted by the Secretary if the state provides assurances deemed adequate by the Secretary that the state is moving to meet all of the requirements for full acceptance. If the Secretary conditionally accepts a state's installation program, the Secretary will provide to the state an explanation of what is necessary to obtain full acceptance.
( 2 ) A conditionally accepted state will be permitted to implement its own installation program in lieu of the HUD-administered program for a period of not more than 3 years. The Secretary may for good cause grant an extension of conditional approval upon petition by the state.
( d ) *Limited exemptions from requirements.* A state installation program may be accepted by the Secretary as a qualifying installation program if the state can demonstrate that it lacks legal authority, as a matter of federal law, to impose the minimum requirements set forth under paragraph (b) of this section in certain geographic areas of the state, but that the minimum requirements do apply in all other geographic areas of the state.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH ARDELL SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v.

DIRECTOR SAN FRANCISCO GREYHOUND BUS DEPT. STATION; et al.,

Defendants.                                                             /

No. C 09-1851 MHP (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The complaint in this action was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted.  Plaintiff was given leave to file an amended complaint, but failed to

do so and the deadline by which to do so has long passed.  Accordingly, this action is

dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.  The clerk shall close

the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 0, 2010 _____________________ Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01851-MHP   Document 8   Filed 02/10/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T08:36:25-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1794

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Max Bolden

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls

____________

 Submitted: March 6, 2017

Filed: March 16, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Max Bolden appeals his sentence–nine months' imprisonment to be followed

by five years of supervised release–following the district court's revocation of his

1

The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States DistrictJudge for the District 1

of South Dakota.
supervised release. Bolden contends the nine-month sentence was substantively

unreasonable because the district court did not consider the mitigating factors that

Bolden suggested at sentencing. Bolden's advisory Guidelines range was six to

twelve months in prison, and an additional period of supervised release could be

imposed for any term of years to life. Bolden does not challenge the revocation itself

and in fact admitted to each of the violations. Nor does Bolden appear to challenge

the five-year period of supervised release.

A review of the Bureau of Prisons records indicates that Bolden has served his

nine-month term and has been released. Because Bolden does not expressly

challenge the revocation itself, or the reasonableness of the period of supervised

release, his appeal is likely moot because he has been released from custody. United

States v. Aden, 830 F.3d 812, 816 (8th Cir. 2016). However, to the extent Bolden's

brief can be read to additionally include a challenge to the five-year period of

supervised release, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

imposing the current sentence. The record indicatesthat the district court considered

Bolden's mitigation arguments and in fact engaged in a lengthy colloquy with Bolden

wherein the court determined that Bolden had not accepted responsibility for his

violations. Further, Bolden's penchant for violating the conditions of supervised

release by drinking alcohol, taking illegal drugs, and missing required urine testing

indicated a need for another lengthy period of supervised release following Bolden's

discharge from custody. The within-Guidelines-range sentence ultimately imposed

by the district court was eminently reasonable. United States v. Boelter, 806 F.3d

1134, 1136 (8th Cir. 2015) (reasonableness standard of review). We affirm.

______________________________

-2-
§ 3286.113 Information provided by retailer. ( a ) *Tracking information.* Within 30 days from the time a purchaser or lessee enters into a contract to purchase or lease a manufactured home, the retailer or distributor of the home must provide HUD with the following information: ( 1 ) The home's serial number and manufacturer's certification label number;
( 2 ) The name and address of the retailer or distributor that is selling or leasing the home;
( 3 ) The state and address where the home is to be sited, and, if known, the name of the local jurisdiction; and
( 4 ) The name of the purchaser or lessee.
( b ) *Installation information.* Within 30 days from the date of installation, the retailer or distributor of the home must provide HUD with the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, telephone number, and license number of the licensed installer;
( 2 ) The date of installer certification of completion of the installation;
( 3 ) The date a qualified inspector verified the installation as being in compliance with the requirements of this part; and
( 4 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the qualified inspector who performed the inspection of the installation as required by § 3286.109.
( c ) *Method of providing information.* ( 1 ) The retailer or distributor must provide a copy of the information set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section to HUD by providing a copy of the information to HUD by facsimile, e-mail, or first-class or overnight delivery.
( 2 ) The information must be sent to: Administrator, Office of Manufactured Housing Programs, HUD, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 9164, Washington, DC 20410-8000, or to a fax number or e-mail address obtained by calling the Office of Manufactured Housing Programs. For convenience only, the URL of the Web site is *http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/mhs/mhshome.cfm* and the toll-free telephone number to contact the Office of Manufactured Housing Programs is 1-800-927-2891, extension 57.
( d ) *Correcting information.* If the information provided by the retailer changes after it has been provided to HUD, the retailer must correct the information within 10 business days after the retailer learns of the change.
( e ) *Record retention requirements.* The retailer or distributor must maintain a copy of the records required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for 3 years from the date of installation, as under § 3286.115.
1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIM AGAINST EDUCATION FUND DEFENDANTS

Case No. C 09-0404 WHA (MEJ) Page 1

McCARTHY, JOHNSON & MILLER

Law Corporation

DIANE SIDD-CHAMPION (SBN 78140)

RAPHAEL SHANNON (SBN 83850)

ANA PEREZ HALLMON (SBN 253309)

ROBERT I. LOCKWOOD (SBN 259870)

595 Market Street, Suite 2200

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 882-2992

Facsimile: (415) 882-2999

E-mail: dsidd-champion@mjmlaw.us

 

Attorneys for Defendants SAL ROSSELLI, JOHN BORSOS, 

 LAURA KURRE, RALPH CORNEJO, WILL CLAYTON, and

 JOHN VELLARDITA in their capacities as Trustees or

 former Trustees of the SEIU United Healthcare Workers-West 

 and Joint Employer Education Fund, and MARY RUTH GROSS

 in her capacity as Executive Director of the SEIU United Healthcare 

 Workers-West and Joint Employer Education Fund

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,

et al.

Plaintiffs,

v.

SAL ROSSELLI, et al.

Defendants.

___________________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 09-0404 WHA (MEJ)

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

DISMISSING CLAIM AGAINST

EDUCATION FUND DEFENDANTS

The Court hereby dismisses the claim that the Education Fund Defendants misused Fund

resources, as alleged in Paragraphs 95 and 139 of the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:___________________________ _____________________________________

WILLIAM H. ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

June 14, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 683 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.943 Supplementary specific requirements under the HUD building product standards and certification program for the grademarking of lumber. ( a ) *Applicable standard.* ( 1 ) In accordance with UM 38j, lumber shall be grademarked in compliance with the U.S. Department of Commerce Voluntary Product Standard PS 20-94 American Softwood Lumber Standard.
( 2 ) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. It is available from the U.S. Department of Commerce, NIST, Office of Voluntary Product Standards, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
( b ) *Labeling.* Under the procedures set forth in § 200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with the applicable standard are required on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. However, in the case of grademarking of lumber, the following information shall be included on the certification label or mark: ( 1 ) The registered symbol which identifies the grading agency;
( 2 ) Species or species combination;
( 3 ) Grade;
( 4 ) Identification of the applicable grading rules when not indicated by the species identification or agency symbol;
( 5 ) Mill or grader;
( 6 ) For members which are less than 5 inches in nominal thickness, indication that the lumber was green or dry at the time of dressing;
( 7 ) Indication that the lumber was finger jointed; and
( 8 ) The certification mark shall be affixed to each piece of lumber.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality assurance.* Periodic tests and quality assurance inspections shall be carried out by the American Lumber Standard Committee as defined in PS 20-94.
[63 FR 5423, Feb. 2, 1998]
### **CHAPTER 14—GRANTS OF DESERT LANDS TO STATES FOR RECLAMATION**

Sec.
641.
Grant of desert land to States authorized.
641a.
Issuance of quitclaim deeds; patents for segregated lands.
641b.
Filing of application for quitclaim deeds.
641c.
Requirements of application for quitclaim deed.
641d.
Effective date of quitclaim; administration of lands relinquished by States.
642.
Liens for expenses of reclamation.
643.
Repealed.
644.
Preference right to entryman under State laws.
645.
Additional arid lands available to Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, and Wyoming for reclamation.
646.
Grant extended to New Mexico and Arizona.
647.
Grant extended to desert lands within part of former Ute Indian Reservation in Colorado.
648.
Omitted.
### Archive of digital CHIRP seismic reflection data collected during USGS cruise 06FSH01 offshore of Siesta Key, Florida, May 2006

By: Arnell S. Harrison**Shawn V. DadismanJames G. Flocks**Dana S. WieseLisa L. Robbins**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds254

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

In May of 2006, the U.S. Geological Survey conducted geophysical surveys offshore of Siesta Key, Florida. This report serves as an archive of unprocessed digital chirp seismic reflection data, trackline maps, navigation files, GIS information, Field Activity Collection System (FACS) logs, observer's logbook, and formal FGDC metadata. Gained digital images of the seismic profiles are also provided.

The archived trace data are in standard Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) SEG-Y format (Barry and others, 1975) and may be downloaded and processed with commercial or public domain software such as Seismic Unix (SU). Example SU processing scripts and USGS software for viewing the SEG-Y files (Zihlman, 1992) are also provided.

#### Study Area
### §9120. Monitoring of licensees' activities

Each license shall require the licensee—

(1) to allow the Administrator to place appropriate Federal officers or employees in or aboard the ocean thermal energy conversion facility or plantship to which the license applies, at such times and to such extent as the Administrator deems reasonable and necessary to assess compliance with any condition or regulation applicable to the license, and to report to the Administrator whenever such officers or employees have reason to believe there is a failure to comply;

(2) to cooperate with such officers and employees in the performance of monitoring functions; and

(3) to monitor the environmental effects, if any, of the operation of the ocean thermal energy conversion facility or plantship in accordance with regulations issued by the Administrator, and to submit such information as the Administrator finds to be necessary and appropriate to assess environmental impacts and to develop and evaluate mitigation methods and possibilities.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title I, §110, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 988; Pub. L. 98–623, title VI, §602(a)(8), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3411.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Par. (1). Pub. L. 98–623 substituted "in or aboard" for "aboard".
### §1111. Annual reports: time for furnishing manuscript and proofs to Director of the Government Publishing Office

The appropriations made for printing and binding may not be used for an annual report or the accompanying documents unless the manuscript and proof is furnished to the Director of the Government Publishing Office in the following manner:

manuscript of the documents accompanying annual reports on or before February 1, each year;

manuscript of the annual report on or before February 15, each year;

complete revised proofs of the accompanying documents on March 1, each year, and of the annual reports on March 10, each year.

Annual reports and accompanying documents shall be printed, made public, and available for distribution not later than within the first five days after the assembling of each regular session of Congress.

This section does not apply to the annual reports of the Smithsonian Institution, the Comptroller of the Currency, or the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 94–273, §28, Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 380; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(22)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–585; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., Supp. II, §121 (July 1, 1916, ch. 209, §3, 39 Stat. 336; June 20, 1936, ch. 630, §8, 49 Stat. 1550).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in section catchline and introductory provisions of first undesignated par.

1999—Pub. L. 106–113 struck out "the Commissioner of Patents," after "Smithsonian Institution," in last par.

1976—Pub. L. 94–273 substituted "February" for "November" and "March" for "December" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 30.75 Response to prepenalty notice. ( a ) The response shall be in a format prescribed in the prepenalty notice. The response shall address the factors set forth in § 30.80 and include any arguments opposing the imposition of a civil money penalty that the respondent may wish to present.
( b ) In any case where respondent seeks to raise ability to pay as an affirmative defense or argument in mitigation, the respondent shall provide documentary evidence as part of its response.
[74 FR 2751, Jan. 15, 2009]
### §1603. Declaration of settlement

#### (a) Aboriginal title extinguishment through prior land and water area conveyances

All prior conveyances of public land and water areas in Alaska, or any interest therein, pursuant to Federal law, and all tentative approvals pursuant to section 6(g) of the Alaska Statehood Act, shall be regarded as an extinguishment of the aboriginal title thereto, if any.

#### (b) Aboriginal title and claim extinguishment where based on use and occupancy; submerged lands underneath inland and offshore water areas and hunting or fishing rights included

All aboriginal titles, if any, and claims of aboriginal title in Alaska based on use and occupancy, including submerged land underneath all water areas, both inland and offshore, and including any aboriginal hunting or fishing rights that may exist, are hereby extinguished.

#### (c) Aboriginal claim extinguishment where based on right, title, use, or occupancy of land or water areas; domestic statute or treaty relating to use and occupancy; or foreign laws; pending claims

All claims against the United States, the State, and all other persons that are based on claims of aboriginal right, title, use, or occupancy of land or water areas in Alaska, or that are based on any statute or treaty of the United States relating to Native use and occupancy, or that are based on the laws of any other nation, including any such claims that are pending before any Federal or state court or the Indian Claims Commission, are hereby extinguished.

(Pub. L. 92–203, §4, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 689.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 6(g) of the Alaska Statehood Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 6(g) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, which is set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

September 8 , 2022

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00468

- CV

FUAD COCHINWALA , Appellant

V.

MUHAMMAD SALIM , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 2018

- 68927

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 25, 2022 . On August 30,
2022 , appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
We dismiss the appeal

.
P ER CURIA M

Panel c onsists of Justices J e well, B ourliot, and Zimmerer
#### § 255.3 Case-by-case conversion to full insurance.

Cross Reference:

The provisions of [24 CFR 251.3](/on/2024-09-16/title-24/section-251.3) apply to this part.

[[61 FR 49038](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-49038), Sept. 17, 1996]
#### § 107.10 Purpose.

These regulations are to carry out the requirements of E.O. 11063 that all action necessary and appropriate be taken to prevent discrimination because of race, color, religion (creed), sex or national origin in the sale, rental, leasing or other disposition of residential property and related facilities or in the use or occupancy thereof where such property or facilities are owned or operated by the Federal Government, or provided with Federal assistance by the Department of Housing and Urban Development and in the lending practices with respect to residential property and related facilities of lending institutions insofar as such practices relate to loans insured, guaranteed or purchased by the Department. These regulations are intended to assure compliance with the established policy of the United States that the benefits under programs and activities of the Department which provide financial assistance, directly or indirectly, for the provision, rehabilitation, or operation of housing and related facilities are made available without discrimination based on race, color, religion (creed), sex or national origin. These regulations are also intended to assure compliance with the policy of this Department to administer its housing programs affirmatively, so as to achieve a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market area have a like range of housing choices available to them regardless of their race, color, religion (creed), sex or national origin.

[45 FR 59514, Sept. 9, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 31360, Aug. 2, 1985]
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–72

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1274, THE

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY

AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1997

APRIL 23, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 127]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 127, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1274, the

‘‘National Institute of Standards and Technology Authorization Act

of 1997’’ under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general

debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Science.

The rule waives bill clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI (the 3 day availability of committee reports) against consideration of the bill. The rule

also makes in order the Committee on Science amendment in the

nature of a substitute as an original bill for the purpose of amendment, with each title being considered as read.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record

prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to

offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules.

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ