alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
### §§975c to 975g. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–468, title VI, §615(a)(1), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2577

Section 975c, act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §1, 38 Stat. 307, related to terminals, stations, and rights of way in Alaska. Section was comprised of part of the last paragraph of section 1 of act Mar. 12, 1914. Section was formerly classified to section 304 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Section 975d, act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §1, 38 Stat. 307, required Alaskan patents to contain reserve for right of way. Section was comprised of part of the last paragraph of section 1 of act Mar. 12, 1914. Section was formerly classified to section 305 of Title 48.

Section 975e, act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §3, 38 Stat. 307, related to disposition of proceeds of lease or sale of public lands in Alaska. Section was formerly classified to section 306 of Title 48.

Section 975f, act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §1, 38 Stat. 307, related to authority of President as to Alaska Railroad, telegraphs, telephones, etc. Section was comprised of the third paragraph of section 1 of act Mar. 12, 1914. Section was formerly classified to section 307 of Title 48.

Section 975g, act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §4, 38 Stat. 307, required officers, agents, etc., to make annual report as to Alaska Railroad, telegraphs, telephones, etc., to President for transmittal to Congress. Section was formerly classified to section 308 of Title 48.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on date of transfer of Alaska Railroad to State [Jan. 5, 1985], pursuant to section 1203 of Title 45, Railroads, see section 615(a) of Pub. L. 97–468.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 11107

Ex. Ord. No. 11107, Apr. 26, 1963, 28 F.R. 4225, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to operate the Alaska Railroad and, subject to authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission, establish rates, was superseded by Ex. Ord. No. 12434, July 19, 1983, 48 F.R. 33229, formerly set out below.

#### Executive Order No. 12434

Ex. Ord. No. 12434, July 19, 1983, 48 F.R. 33229, related to the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to operate and administer the Alaska Railroad and to determine procedures for establishing rates for the Alaska Railroad, and to the authority of the Secretary of Transportation and Interstate Commerce Commission with respect to such rates. The Alaska Railroad was transferred to the State of Alaska on Jan. 5, 1985, and the State of Alaska has established the Alaska Railroad Corporation to manage and operate the Alaska Railroad.
§ 206.36 Seasoning requirements for existing non-HECM liens. ( a ) The Commissioner may establish, through notice, seasoning requirements for existing non-HECM liens. Such seasoning requirements shall not prohibit the payoff of existing non-HECM liens using HECM proceeds if the liens have been in place for longer than 12 months prior to the HECM closing or if the liens have resulted in cash to the borrower in an amount of $500 or less, whether at closing or through cumulative draws prior to the date of the HECM closing.
( b ) Mortgagees must provide documentation satisfactory to the Commissioner as established by notice that the seasoning requirement was met.
( c ) *Home Equity Lines of Credit.* The borrower may pay off, at closing, a Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) that does not meet seasoning requirements from borrower funds, the HECM funds, or a combination of HECM funds and borrower funds, as long as the draw from HECM funds does not exceed the percentage approved by the Commissioner under the authority of § 206.25(a).
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Chase Manhattan Bank, as Successor Trustee of the Trust for Muriel McC. Hubbard. Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Motions for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Gregory S., Jr., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Gregory S., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Heather S., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Gregory S., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Natalie S., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Gregory S., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[831 NYS2d 726]

In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated April 3, 2006, which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court’s determination that he neglected the subject children by virtue of his drug use and his commission of an act of domestic violence in their presence is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Michelle L.,*24 AD3d 443, 444 [2005]; *Matter of Ayana Jean L.,*23 AD3d 472, 473 [2005]; *Matter of Sheneika V.,*20 AD3d 541, 542 [2005]; *Matter of Aminat O.,*20 AD3d 480, 481 [2005]; *Matter of Ziaire M.,*309 AD2d 938, 939 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
### §562. Appraisal and sale of town lots

The lots so surveyed shall be appraised under the direction of the Secretary of the Interior and sold under his direction at not less than their appraised value at public auction to the highest bidders, from time to time, for cash, and the lots offered for sale and not disposed of may afterwards be sold at not less than the appraised value under such regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe. Reclamation funds may be used to defray the necessary expenses of appraisement and sale, and the proceeds of such sales shall be covered into the reclamation fund.

(Apr. 16, 1906, ch. 1631, §2, 34 Stat. 116.)
#### § 203.40 Location of property.

The mortgaged property shall be located within the United States, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa. The mortgaged property, if otherwise acceptable to the Commissioner, may be located in any community where the housing standards meet the requirements of the Commissioner.

[49 FR 12697, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 36264, July 9, 1996]
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 135

_____________________________
L EON J. N ICELY , J R

. ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Cor pus

– Original Jurisdiction.

February 6, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

. J AY , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_________ ____________________2 Leon J. Nicely, Jr., pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
### §§600g to 600g–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 600g, Pub. L. 93–493, title X, §1001, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1496, related to authorization for construction, operation, and maintenance of Nueces River project.

Section 600g–1, Pub. L. 93–493, title X, §1002, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1496, related to repayment costs of Nueces River project.

Section 600g–2, Pub. L. 93–493, title X, §1003, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1496, related to water delivery and reimbursable construction cost repayment contracts.

Section 600g–3, Pub. L. 93–493, title X, §1004, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1497, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife resources and enhancement of recreation opportunities.

Section 600g–4, Pub. L. 93–493, title X, §1005, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1497, related to authorization of appropriations for Nueces River project.
#### § 3286.201 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart C is to establish the requirements for a person to qualify to install a manufactured home in accordance with the HUD-administered installation program. Installers will be required to meet licensing, training, and insurance requirements established in this part. Licensed installers will self-certify their installations of manufactured homes to be in compliance with the Model Manufactured Home Installation Standards in part 3285 of this chapter. In order for such an installer to self-certify compliance with the installation standards, the installer will have to assure that acceptable inspections, as required in subpart F of this part, are performed.
§ 1000.118 What recourse does a recipient have if HUD disapproves a proposal to provide assistance to non-low-income families or a model housing activity? ( a ) Within 30 calendar days of receiving HUD's denial of a proposal to provide assistance to non-low-income families or a model housing activity, the recipient may request reconsideration of the denial in writing. The request shall set forth justification for the reconsideration.
( b ) Within twenty calendar days of receiving the request, HUD shall reconsider the recipient's request and either affirm or reverse its initial decision in writing, setting forth its reasons for the decision. If the decision was made by the Assistant Secretary, the decision will constitute final agency action. If the decision was made at a lower level, then paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section will apply.
( c ) The recipient may appeal any denial of reconsideration by filing an appeal with the Assistant Secretary within twenty calendar days of receiving the denial. The appeal shall set forth the reasons why the recipient does not agree with HUD's decision and set forth justification for the reconsideration.
( d ) Within twenty calendar days of receipt of the appeal, the Assistant Secretary shall review the recipient's appeal and act on the appeal, setting forth the reasons for the decision.
[63 FR 12349, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 71525, Dec. 3, 2012]
### §1121. Paper and envelopes for Government agencies in the District of Columbia

The Director of the Government Publishing Office may procure, under direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, as provided by sections 509–516 of this title, and furnish on requisition, paper and envelopes (not including envelopes printed in the course of manufacture) in common use by two or more departments, establishments, or services of the Government in the District of Columbia, and reimbursement shall be made to the Director of the Government Publishing Office from appropriations or funds available for the purpose. Paper and envelopes so furnished by the Director of the Government Publishing Office may not be procured in any other manner.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1264; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §225 (June 7, 1924, ch. 303, §1, 43 Stat. 592).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" wherever appearing.
Exhibit 10.1
 FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Purpose
 Administration provided, however,
 Eligible Participants
 Types of Incentives




---



##### 



Shares Subject to the Plan
 Number of Shares
 Cancellation
 Type of Common Stock
 Performance Shares
 Performance Objectives
 Not Stockholder
 No Adjustments
 2




---



##### 



Expiration of Performance Share
 Stock Options
 Price
 Number
 Duration and Time for Exercise
 Manner of Exercise
 3




---



##### 



Incentive Stock Options
       Stock Appreciation Rights
 4




---



##### 



Number
 Duration
 Exercise
 Payment
    5




---



##### 



Stock Awards, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
 Number of Shares
 Sale Price
 Restrictions
    Escrow
 6




---



##### 



Issuance and Delivery of Shares
 Stockholder
 General
 Effective Date
 Duration
 Non-transferability of Incentives
 7




---



##### 



Effect of Termination or Death
 Additional Condition
 Adjustment
 Incentive Plans and Agreements
 8




---



##### 



Withholding
   No Continued Employment, Engagement or Right to Corporate Assets
 Deferral Permitted
 Amendment of the Plan
 Sale, Merger, Exchange or Liquidation
 9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



Definition of Fair Market Value
 Prohibition on Repricing
 Code Section 409A Provisions
 11
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT**




**pursuant
      to 18 u.s.c. section 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC,
      Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as President of the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April
      13,
      2006








/s/
      Craig A. Zabala


Craig
      A.
      Zabala


President


(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HINKLE et al., Respondents, v. ZIMMERMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

Action by Eugene A. Hinlde and others against Jacob A. Zimmerman. G. Putzel, for appellant. J. W. Mcllhenny, for respondents. No opinion. Appeal from decision dismissed, with costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### TOHER v. SCHAEFER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

1. Municipal Court—Appealable Orders—Costs.

Under Laws 1902, pp. 1562, 1563, c. 580, §§ 253-256, regulating appeals from the Municipal Court, an order imposing a greater sum than $10 costs as a condition for allowing an amendment to a pleading, not being mentioned in such sections, is not appealable.

2. Same.

Under Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, p. 1588, c. 580) 5 335, providing that the court may, in its discretion, as a condition for allowing an amendment to a pleading, require the payment of a sum not to exceed $10 as costs to the adverse party, a justice of such court can in no event impose a greater sum than $10 as a condition for allowing an amendment to a pleading.

3. Same—Remedy.

Where a Municipal Court justice erroneously imposed a greater sum than $10 as a condition for allowing an amendment to a pleading, the remedy of the party aggrieved was to apply to the justice for a reargument of the motion as to the terms of the amendment.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

Action by Owen Toher against John V. Schaefer, Jr. From an order imposing a larger sum than $10 on plaintiff as a condition of his right to amend the pleading, he appeals. Dismissed.

See 91 N. Y. Supp’. 3.

Argued before SCOTT, O’GORMAN, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Henry K. Davis, for appellant.

Charles S. Foote, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from is not one of those enumerated in sections .253, 254, 255, or 256 .of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, pp. 1562, 1563, c. 580), and is therefore not appeal-able to this court. Spiegelman v. Union Ry. Co., 95 App. Div. 92, 88 N. Y. Supp. 478; Cohen v. Ridgewood Shirt Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 188; White v. Lawyers’ Surety Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 247.

While we have not jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, we deem it proper, nevertheless, to point out that under section 335, p. 1588, of the Municipal Court act, a justice of the Municipal Court can in no event impose a greater sum than $10 as a condition for allowing an amendment to a pleading. It may be that such costs will often appear to be inadequate, especially in a case that has been appealed and comes back for a new trial, but the remedy can be found only in an amendment of the act removing the limitation upon the judicial discretion in that regard. Plaintiff’s immediate remedy for the grievance of which he complains is to apply to the justice in the Municipal Court for a reargument of the motion as to the terms of the amendment.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Delegation of Authority No.492]

By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of State, including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a) and the Presidential Memorandum dated September 2, 2020, relating to Section 1 of the July 2, 1980, Senate Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the Agreement between the United States of America and the International Atomic Energy Agency for the Application of Safeguards in the United States of America, with attached Protocol, signed at Vienna on November 18, 1977 (the “Voluntary Offer Agreement”), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary for International Security and Nonproliferation, to the extent authorized by law, the authority to provide to the Congress the notifications and explanations specified in Section 1 of the Senate's Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the Voluntary Offer Agreement.

                    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive order, regulation, or procedure as amended from time to time. The Secretary, the Deputy Secretary, and the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security may at any time exercise any authority                           ( print page 77481)                        or function delegated by this delegation of authority.                

                    This delegation of authority does not amend, supersede, or affect the validity of any other delegation of authority dealing with submission of reports to the Congress. This delegation of authority shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: November 3, 2020.

Michael R. Pompeo,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2020-26540 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-27- P
#### § 26.49 The record.

The hearing will be recorded and transcribed by a reporter designated by the Department under the supervision of the ALJ. The parties and the public, at their own expense, may obtain copies of transcripts from the reporter. A copy of the transcript shall be made available at cost to the parties upon request. The transcript of testimony, exhibits, and other evidence admitted at the hearing and all papers and requests filed in the proceeding constitute the record for the decision by the ALJ and the Secretary or designee.
### §871. Certain grants and laws unaffected

Nothing contained in section 870 of this title is intended or shall be held or construed to increase, diminish, or affect the rights of States under grants other than for the support of common or public schools by numbered school sections in place, and said section shall not apply to indemnity or lieu selections or exchanges or the right after January 25, 1927, to select indemnity for numbered school sections in place lost to the State under the provisions of said section or any Acts, and all existing laws governing such grants and indemnity or lieu selections and exchanges are continued in full force and effect.

(Jan. 25, 1927, ch. 57, §2, 44 Stat. 1027.)