alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §986. Selection of lands confirmed

All land selected and reported to the General Land Office as swamp and overflowed land by the several States entitled to the provisions of said Act of September 28, 1850, prior to March 3, A.D. 1857, are confirmed to said States respectively so far as the same remained vacant and unappropriated and not interfered with by an actual settlement under any law of the United States.

(R.S. §2484.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2484 derived from act Mar. 3, 1857, ch. 117, 11 Stat. 251.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

General Land Office and office of Commissioner of General Land Office abolished by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100. Functions of former transferred to Bureau of Land Management, and functions of latter transferred to Secretary of the Interior or that officer as he may designate, by that Plan. See section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3136 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3136

  Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the Department of 
  Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2005 for veterans medical services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

 Mr. Edwards (for himself and Mr. Obey) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the Department of 
  Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2005 for veterans medical services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2005:

                     DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

                     Veterans Health Administration

                            medical services

    For an additional amount for ``Medical Services'', $1,500,000,000, 
to remain available until September 30, 2006: Provided, That the amount 
provided under this heading is designated as an emergency requirement 
pursuant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress), the 
concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal year 2006: Provided 
further, That amounts made available under this heading may be 
transferred to other accounts of the Department of Veterans Affairs to 
the extent necessary to reimburse those accounts for prior transfers to 
``Medical Services'' after notice of the amount and purpose of the 
transfer is provided to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate 
and House of Representatives and a period of 30 days has elapsed: 
Provided further, That the transfer authority in this paragraph is in 
addition to any other transfer authority available to the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

CURRIE-WHITE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BLOCKBUSTER, INC., 

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-2593 MMC

ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR

DEFENDANT’S CORPORATE

REPRESENTATIVE TO ATTEND

ENE BY PHONE

Date: February 4, 2010

Mediator: Roderick Bushnell

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s corporate representative, Nathan Fay, is

excused from personal attendance at the February 4, 2010, Early Neutral Evaluation before Roderick

Bushnell. Mr. Fay shall be available to participate by telephone at all times during the ENE,

pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6-10.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

January 22, 2010 By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02593-MMC Document 54 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 1
### §8473. Environmental impact statements under section 4332 of this title

The following actions are not deemed to be major Federal actions for purposes of section 4332(2)(C) of this title:

(1) the grant or denial of any temporary exemption under this chapter for any electric powerplant;

(2) the grant or denial of any permanent exemption under this chapter for any existing electric powerplant, other than an exemption—

(A) under section 8352(c) of this title, relating to cogeneration;

(B) Repealed. Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(24)(B), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 314;

(C) under section 8352(b) of this title, relating to certain State or local requirements;

(D) under section 8352(g) of this title, relating to certain intermediate load powerplants; and

(3) the grant or denial of any exemption under this chapter for any powerplant for which the Secretary finds, in consultation with the appropriate Federal agency, and publishes such finding that an environmental impact statement is required in connection with another Federal action and such statement will be prepared by such agency and will reflect the exemption adequately.

Except as provided in the preceding provisions of this section, any determination of what constitutes or does not constitute a major Federal action shall be made under section 4332 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title VII, §763, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3346; Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(24), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 314.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1987—Par. (1). Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(24)(A), struck out "or major fuel-burning installation" after "powerplant".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(24), struck out "or major fuel-burning installation" after "powerplant" and struck out subpar. (B) which read as follows: "under section 8352(l) of this title, relating to scheduled equipment outages;".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(24)(A), struck out "or major fuel-burning installation" after "powerplant".
§ 28.20 Request for approval by the Department of Justice. ( a ) If the General Counsel or designee determines that the Report of Investigation supports an action under this part, he or she must submit a written request to the Department of Justice for approval to issue a complaint under § 28.25.
( b ) The request shall include a description of the claims or statements at issue; the evidence supporting the allegations; an estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, services, or other benefits requested or demanded in violation of § 28.10; any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances that may relate to the claims or statements; and a statement that there is a reasonable prospect of collecting an appropriate amount of penalties and assessments.
[73 FR 76831, Dec. 17, 2008]
### §507. Construction for dam safety

Except as provided in section 509b of this title, construction authorized by this subchapter shall be for the purposes of dam safety and not for the specific purposes of providing additional conservation storage capacity or of developing benefits over and above those provided by the original dams and reservoirs. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to reduce the amount of project costs allocated to reimbursable purposes heretofore authorized.

(Pub. L. 95–578, §3, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2471; Pub. L. 114–113, div. D, title II, §203(1), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2406.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–113 substituted "Except as provided in section 509b of this title, construction" for "Construction".
EXHIBIT NUMBER 11

             INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
               (Unaudited and in thousands except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
                                                        June 30,             June 30,
                                                   -----------------   -----------------
                                                    1997      1996       1997      1996
                                                   -------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>    
Pro forma net income ...........................   $ 2,477   $   521   $ 3,909   $   944

Shares:
   Weighted average number of common shares
      outstanding ..............................    15,060     9,606    15,057     9,606
   Assuming conversion of options issued and
      outstanding ..............................     7,248     7,358     7,215     7,355
                                                   -------   -------   -------   -------

   Weighted average common and
      common stock equivalent shares outstanding    22,308    16,964    22,272    16,961
                                                   =======   =======   =======   =======



Pro forma net income per share..................     $0.11     $0.03     $0.18     $0.06
                                                     =====     =====     =====     =====


</TABLE>



















                                      17
### §907. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–296, title I, §108(a)(2), Aug. 15, 1994, 108 Stat. 1481

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title VII, §706, as added July 30, 1965, Pub. L. 89–97, title I, §109(a), 79 Stat. 339; amended Jan. 2, 1968, Pub. L. 90–248, title I, §165, title IV, §403(d), 81 Stat. 874, 932; July 18, 1984, Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VI, §2663(j)(2)(C)(ii), 98 Stat. 1170; Apr. 7, 1986, Pub. L. 99–272, title XII, §12102(g)(1), 100 Stat. 285; Oct. 22, 1986, Pub. L. 99–514, §2, 100 Stat. 2095, provided for appointment by Secretary every four years of an Advisory Council on Social Security and functions of Council.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Mar. 31, 1995, see section 110(a) of Pub. L. 103–296, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 401 of this title.

#### Applicability of Repeal to 1994 Council

Pub. L. 103–296, title I, §108(a)(2), Aug. 15, 1994, 108 Stat. 1481, provided in part that: "This paragraph [repealing this section] shall not apply with respect to the Advisory Council for Social Security appointed in 1994."
#### § 320.1 General.

The Association is authorized by section 306(g) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1721(g)) upon such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate, to guarantee the timely payment of principal of and interest on securities that are based on and backed by a trust or pool composed of mortgages which are insured or guaranteed by FHA, FmHA or VA. The Association's guaranty of mortgage-backed securities is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. This subpart is limited to “modified pass-through” securities, and does not purport to set forth all the procedures and requirements that apply to the issuance and guaranty of such securities. All such transactions are governed by the specific terms and provisions of the Association's Mortgage-Backed Securities Guides (MBS Guides) and contracts entered into by the parties.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL

UNION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAL ROSELLI, JORGE RODRIGUEZ, 

et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00404 WHA

ORDER RE DISCOVERY

BY EDUCATION FUND

DEFENDANTS

For purposes of the second case management order dated July 15, 2009, the Education

Fund defendants will be allowed ten interrogatories of their own. Their interests overlap

substantially with other defendants but have a sufficiently distinct and separate interest that they

may be allowed ten interrogatories of their own. By NOON ON JANUARY 13, 2010, the Education

Fund defendants shall specify which of any previously propounded interrogatories they wish to

count for their ten interrogatories and plaintiffs must answer them by NOON ON JANUARY 29. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 453 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 232.1 Eligibility requirements, generally; applicability of certain requirements. ( a ) *Eligibility, generally.* All of the requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 200, subpart A, except for the requirements for “eligible mortgagor” in 24 CFR 200.5, apply to mortgages insured under section 232 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715w), as amended.
( b ) *Applicability of certain requirements.* As of October 9, 2012 the provisions in 24 CFR 207.255(b)(5), 207.258, 232.3, 232.11, 232.254, 232.903(c) and (d), and subpart F of part 232, excluding §§ 232.1007, 232.1009, and 232.1015 of subpart F are applicable only to transactions for which a firm commitment has been issued under this part on or after July 12, 2013.
[77 FR 55136, Sept. 7, 2012, as amended at 78 FR 25185, Apr. 30, 2013]
### §904. Forfeiture of unearned grants; restoration to public domain

There is forfeited to the United States, and the United States resumes the title thereto, all lands granted prior to September 29, 1890, to any State or to any corporation to aid in the construction of a railroad opposite to and coterminous with the portion of any such railroad not on that date completed, and in operation, for the construction or benefit of which such lands were granted; and all such lands are declared to be a part of the public domain: Provided, That sections 904 to 907 of this title shall not be construed as forfeiting the right-of-way or station grounds of any railroad company granted prior to September 29, 1890.

(Sept. 29, 1890, ch. 1040, §1, 26 Stat. 496.)
(No. 91-CC-0630

#### Ronnie Hamilton, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 29, 1992.*

Ronnie Hamilton, *pro se,*for Claimant.

Roland W. Burris, Attorney General (Gregory T. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

OPINION

Sommer, J.

This claim is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by the Claimant and a counter-motion for summary judgment filed by the Respondent. The parties have presented various documents with their motions, and the Claimant has provided by affidavit certain information requested by this Court s order of July 24, 1992.

*325The facts of this claim are agreed. When the Claimant was moved from Menard Correctional Center to the Dixon Correctional Center in April of 1990, his television arrived at Dixon in a nonworking condition. The television had been working when it left Menard. The Claimant states that “the picture tube and the circuit boards and other inside components, were permanently broken.”

The Claimant went through the prison administrative procedures and was awarded $49.12. He contends that a similar television costs $242, and that he should receive the difference between $242 and $49.12, which is $192.88.

The State contends that the Claimant accepted $49.12 in full and complete satisfaction of his claim, and that he signed an agreement releasing the State from liability for damage of his personal property.

It is our opinion that the State’s contentions are faulty. The signed release is a part of the Claimant’s 1986 permit to have the television. The Claimant had no choice but to sign; and if such presigned releases were effective, no prisoner would ever recover for damage to his property. This Court has consistently held that prisoners can recover for damage to property held exclusively in the possession of the State. Additionally, the State contends that the Claimant is bound by the administrative decision to award him $49.12 and the fact that he accepted the money. In matters such as this, monies awarded from the tort claim fund are placed in the prisoner’s trust account. We do not believe that the placing of the money in the trust fund amounts to a full satisfaction and accord agreed to by the Claimant.

The question remaining is whether the amount of $49.12 is adequate. This figure was arrived at by assigning *326substantial depreciation. In this case the Claimant either has a working television set or he has nothing, and as the Claimant is a pauper, his being able to raise the entire remaining $192.88 to buy a new set is problematical. The prison administrative procedure may not make low awards and claim such to be binding, thereby depriving the prisoner of his property.

In this claim we believe the administrative award to be so low as to deprive the Claimant of his property. We award the Claimant $175, allowing for some depreciation. It is therefore ordered that the Claimants motion for summary judgment is granted and the Respondent’s countermotion for summaiy judgment is denied, and the Claimant is awarded $175.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICTOR JONES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

NADIA CLARK, et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C09-4757 BZ

Related Case: C09-1613 BZ

ORDER SCHEDULING JURY TRIAL

AND ORDER CONSOLIDATING

CASES

Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the Joint Case Management Statement is adopted,

except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further

ORDERED that:

1. DATES

Last Day for Expert Discovery: Friday, 4/16/2010

Last Day for Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: Friday, 4/9/2010

Further Status Conference: Monday, 4/5/2010, 4:00 p.m.

Last Day for Expert Disclosure: Friday, 4/2/2010

Close of Non-expert Discovery: Friday, 3/26/2010

2. Consolidation

By stipulation of parties, IT IS ORDERED that the cases

Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 69 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

referenced above be consolidated for all purposes pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. With the exception of the

dates above, the case management order in Fleming v. Clark,

C09-1613 dated August 12, 2009 shall remain in effect.

Dated: January 27, 2010

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\JONES V. CLARK\PRETRIAL AND CONSOLID ORDER.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 69 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 232.880 Items to be delivered on submitting claim. Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of intention to file claim, or within such further period as may be agreed upon by the Commission in writing, the lender shall deliver to the Commissioner: ( a ) The fiscal data pertaining to the loan transactions;
( b ) Receipts covering all disbursements as required by the fiscal data form;
( c ) The original note and any security instrument or instruments which shall be assigned to the Commissioner without recourse or warranty, except that the lender must warrant that no act or omission of the lender has impaired the validity and priority of such security instrument or instruments, that the security instrument or instruments are prior to all mechanics' and material-men's liens filed of record subsequent to the recording of such security instrument or instruments regardless of whether such liens attached prior to such recording date, and prior to all liens and encumbrances which may have attached or defects which may have arisen subsequent to the recording of such security instrument or instruments, except such liens or other matters as may be approved by the Commissioner, that the amount stated in the instrument of assignment is actually due and owing under the security instrument or instruments, that there are no offsets or counterclaims thereto, and that the lender has a good right to assign such note and security instrument or instruments;
( d ) The assignment to the Commissioner of all rights and interests arising under the note and security instrument or instruments so in default and all claims of the lender against the borrower or others arising out of the loan transaction;
( e ) All policies of title or other insurance or surety bonds, or other guarantees and any and all claims thereunder; including evidence satisfactory to the Commissioner that the original title coverage has been extended to include the assignment of the note and security instrument or instruments to the Commissioner;
( f ) All records, ledger cards, documents, books, papers and accounts relating to the loan transaction;
( g ) Any additional information or data which the Commissioner may require;
( h ) The following cash items, held in connection with the loan insured under this subpart, shall either be retained by the lender or delivered to the Commissioner in accordance with instructions to be issued by the Commissioner at the time the insurance claim is filed. ( 1 ) Any cash held by the lender or its agents or to which it is entitled including deposits made for the account of the borrower and which have not been applied in reduction of the principal of the loan indebtedness.
( 2 ) All funds held by the lender for the account of the borrower received pursuant to any other agreement.
### §1467a. Working capital fund; credit card refunds or rebates

Refunds or rebates received on an on-going basis from a credit card services provider under the Department of the Interior's charge card programs, on and after October 11, 2000, may be deposited to and retained without fiscal year limitation in the Departmental Working Capital Fund established under 43 U.S.C. 1467 and used to fund management initiatives of general benefit to the Department of the Interior's bureaus and offices as determined by the Secretary or his designee.

(Pub. L. 106–291, title I, §113, Oct. 11, 2000, 114 Stat. 943.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title I, §118], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–159.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Rand Logistics, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 25, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      June
      25, 2009
            
            /s/ Laurence
      S. LevyLaurence
      S. LevyChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer