alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 180.500 Discovery. ( a ) *In general.* This subpart governs discovery in aid of administrative proceedings under this part. Discovery in Fair Housing Act matters shall be completed 15 days before the date scheduled for hearing or at such time as the ALJ shall direct. Discovery in non-Fair Housing Act matters shall be completed as the ALJ directs.
( b ) *Scope.* The parties are encouraged to engage in voluntary discovery procedures. Discovery shall be conducted as expeditiously and inexpensively as possible, consistent with the needs of all parties to obtain relevant evidence. Unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ, the parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the proceeding, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of documents or persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not grounds for objection that information sought will be inadmissible if the information appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
( c ) *Methods.* Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: ( 1 ) Deposition upon oral examination or written questions.
( 2 ) Written interrogatories.
( 3 ) Requests for the production of documents or other evidence for inspection and other purposes.
( 4 ) Requests for admissions.
( 5 ) Upon motion of a party, the presiding ALJ may issue an order requiring a physical or mental examination of a party or of a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party.
( d ) *Frequency and sequence.* Unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ or restricted by this subpart, the frequency or sequence of these methods is not limited.
( e ) *Non-intervening aggrieved person.* For purposes of obtaining discovery from a non-intervening aggrieved person, the term *party* as used in this subpart includes the aggrieved person.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #14-2004 L.P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.
 
 By:
              /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
              Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
              March
      28, 2008
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4202 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-641

Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and 

Components Thereof
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4202 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-641

Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and 

Components Thereof
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-135

_____________________________

LEON J. NICELY, JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus – Original Jurisdiction.

February 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

JAY, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Leon J. Nicely, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 6 Case3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document70 Filed03/25/10 Page1 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 6 Case3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document70 Filed03/25/10 Page2 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 6 Case3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document70 Filed03/25/10 Page3 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/25/10 Page 4 of 6 Case3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document70 Filed03/25/10 Page4 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/25/10 Page 5 of 6 Case3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document70 Filed03/25/10 Page5 of 6
Case3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document70 Filed03/25/10 Page6 of 6

March 25, 2010. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 71 Filed 03/25/10 Page 6 of 6
Part I, Section B, Item C - ID Method

T-C5073P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 05/04/2010*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENCE CLUB, 

INC., et al. 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

HENRY A. AMADO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-2054 RS 

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR DENIAL 

OR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT 

 

 On May 04, 2010, defendants filed a document entitled “Defendants’ FRCP 56(f) Motion 

For Denial or Continuance of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” Plaintiff’s motion for 

summary judgment is scheduled for hearing on May 27, 2010. Defendants’ opposition papers are 

due on May 06, 2010; they contend that a meaningful response to two claims plaintiffs advance in 

their motion depends on receipt of certain outstanding discovery. Defendants shall file any 

substantive opposition on the merits that they may have, based on the information they presently 

possess by the May 06 deadline. Defendants shall include further explanation in the opposition 

papers as to why and how the specific outstanding discovery would create a genuine issue of 

material fact. 

Case 3:09-cv-02054-RS Document 77 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

Dated: 05/04/2010 

 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-02054-RS Document 77 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 2
(March 29, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joan Little, Appellant, v William Ciuros, Jr., as Commissioner of Correction of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 27, 1978, which, *inter alia,*denied the application and remanded her to the custody of the Department of Correction. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The extradition of petitioner is stayed for 10 days pending her appeal to the Court of Appeals. The application for bail pending appeal is denied. The petitioner’s claims supporting her resistance to extradition to North Carolina, under the necessities of our Federal system and the requirements of the Uniform. Criminal Extradition Act (CPL art 570), must be presented in the courts of North Carolina or in the Federal courts (see *Sweeney v Woodall,*344 US 86; cf. *United States ex rel. Brown v Fogel,*395 F2d 291; *People ex rel. Higley v Millspaw,*281 NY 441). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello and Latham, JJ., concur; Shapiro, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment appealed from and to grant petitioner a hearing, with the following memorandum: While it may be highly doubtful that petitioner can, upon a hearing, establish that, upon her return to the State of North Carolina, that State will indulge in outlawed conduct upon her, she should not be summarily deprived of an opportunity to establish that fact. She asserts that she is in a position to prove, if given a hearing, that she is a *1054marked woman and that the officials of the State of North Carolina have agreed that, if she is returned to that State, she will be killed. In my opinion, under the exceptional circumstances of this case, the petitioner is entitled to a hearing to establish, if she can, that ordering her return to the State of North Carolina would result in a gross miscarriage of justice. I, therefore, vote to grant her a hearing.
§ 3280.106 Exit facilities; egress windows and devices. ( a ) Every room designed expressly for sleeping purposes, unless it has an exit door (*see* § 3280.105), shall have at least one outside window or approved exit device which meets the requirements of § 3280.404, the “Standard for Egress Windows and Devices for Use in Manufactured Homes.”
( b ) The bottom of the window opening shall not be more than 36 inches above the floor.
( c ) Locks, latches, operating handles, tabs, and any other window screen or storm window devices which need to be operated in order to permit exiting, shall not be located in excess of 54 inches from the finished floor.
( d ) Integral rolled-in screens shall not be permitted in an egress window unless the window is of the hinged-type.
[49 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 36086, Sept. 14, 1984; 52 FR 4581, Feb. 12, 1987]
### §3208. Federal assistance for groundwater recharge, aquifer storage, and water source substitution projects

#### (a) In general

The Secretary, at the request of and in coordination with affected Indian Tribes, States (including subdivisions and departments of a State), or a public agency organized pursuant to State law, may provide technical or financial assistance for, participate in, and enter into agreements (including agreements with irrigation entities) for—

(1) groundwater recharge projects;

(2) aquifer storage and recovery projects; or

(3) water source substitution for aquifer protection projects.

#### (b) Limitation

Nothing in this section authorizes additional technical or financial assistance for, or participation in an agreement for, a surface water storage facility to be constructed or expanded.

#### (c) Requirement

A construction project shall only be eligible for financial assistance under this section if the project meets the conditions for funding under section 3202(a)(2)(C)(ii) of this title.

#### (d) Cost sharing

Cost sharing for a project funded under this section shall be in accordance with section 3202(b) of this title.

#### (e) Environmental laws

In providing funding for a project under this section, the Secretary shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, including —

(1) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);

(2) any obligations for fish, wildlife, or water quality protection in permits or licenses granted by a Federal agency or a State; and

(3) any applicable Federal or State laws (including regulations).

#### (f) Authorization by Congress for major project construction

A project with a total estimated cost of $500,000,000 or more shall only be eligible for construction funding under this section if the project is authorized for construction by an Act of Congress.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. D, title IX, §40910, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1126.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (e)(1), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Wage Rate Requirements

For provisions relating to rates of wages to be paid to laborers and mechanics on projects for construction, alteration, or repair work funded under div. D or an amendment by div. D of Pub. L. 117–58, including authority of Secretary of Labor, see section 18851 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
### §421e. Municipal and industrial water supply delivery and distribution; allocation of loan funds; loan repayment contract requirements; rate of interest

Unless otherwise provided in the Act authorizing construction of the project, the delivery and distribution of municipal and industrial water supplies shall be deemed to be an authorized project purpose under sections 421a to 421h of this title, and where appropriate, an allocation of loan funds acceptable to the Secretary shall be made between irrigation and municipal and industrial purposes. Loan repayment contracts shall require that the borrower pay interest on that portion of the unamortized loan obligation (including interest during construction) allocated in each year to municipal and industrial purposes at the rate provided in the Act authorizing the project, or absent such an authorized rate, at a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the contract, or contract amendment entered into pursuant to section 421f of this title, is executed, on the basis of the computed average interest rate payable by the Treasury upon its outstanding marketable public obligations which are neither due nor callable for redemption for fifteen years from date of issue, and by adjusting such average rate to the nearest one-eighth of 1 per centum.

(July 4, 1955, ch. 271, §5, as added Pub. L. 92–487, Oct. 3, 1972, 86 Stat. 805.)
### **CHAPTER 11A—BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES**

Sec.
364.
Uniformity in geographic nomenclature and orthography; exercise of functions of Secretary of the Interior.
364a.
Board on Geographic Names; establishment and membership; appointment and term of office.
364b.
Formulation of principles, policies and procedures; action by Secretary; recommendations of Board.
364c.
Studies, investigations, and records; staff assistance; advisory committees.
364d.
Promulgation of decisions; furnishing information.
364e.
Standardization of geographic names; abolition of United States Board on Geographical Names in Department of the Interior; transfer of duties.
364f.
Application to naming of offices or establishments.
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, W. Carl Whitmer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IASIS Healthcare LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:December 21, 2007/s/ W. Carl Whitmer
§ 2002.5 How to make a request for OIG records; records produced. ( a ) Any request for OIG records must be made in writing. The easiest way to make a FOIA request is electronically through our public website at *www.hudoig.gov .* A request may also be made by submitting the written request to The Office of Inspector General; Department of Housing and Urban Development; 451 Seventh Street SW, Suite 8260, Washington, DC 20410. The envelope should indicate it is a FOIA request. A request for OIG records may also be made in person during normal business hours at any office where OIG employees are permanently stationed.
( b ) Each request must reasonably describe the desired record, including the title or name, author, subject matter, and number or date, where possible, so that the record may be identified and located. The more specific the FOIA request for records, the more likely OIG officials will be able to locate the records requested. The request should also include the name, address and telephone number of the requester, the fee category that the requester believes applies to the request, and the form or format in which the requester would like the desired record to be reproduced, if the requester has a preference. In order to enable the OIG to comply with the time limitations set forth in § 2002.15, both the envelope containing a written request and the letter itself should clearly indicate that the subject is a Freedom of Information Act request.
( c ) The request must be accompanied by the fee or an offer to pay the fee as determined in § 15.106 of this title and § 2002.13.
( d ) The OIG may require information verifying the requester's identity, if the requester requests agency records pertaining to the requester, a minor, or an individual who is legally incompetent. Failure to provide the information when requested will result in the request being found insufficient and closed. It will not prevent the future refiling of the request.
( e ) Duplication of available records will be made as promptly as possible. Such duplication can take the form of paper copy, audiovisual materials, or machine-readable documentation (*e.g.,* electronic documents on CD, DVD, flash drive, etc.). Records that are published or available for sale will not be reproduced.
( f ) The OIG shall honor a requester's specified preference of form or format of disclosure if the record is readily reproducible with reasonable efforts in the requested form or format by the office responding to the request.
( g ) If the requester makes a request for expedited processing, the request must provide a detailed explanation of the basis for the request. The requester should also include a statement certifying the truth of the circumstances supporting the requester's compelling need. Requests for expedited processing that simply recite the statutory language are generally not granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer
of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 14, 2013





/s/Richard R. Royall

Richard R. Royall

Chief Financial Officer
§ 570.901 Review for compliance with the primary and national objectives and other program requirements. HUD will review each entitlement, Insular Areas, and HUD-administered small cities recipient's program to determine if the recipient has carried out its activities and certifications in compliance with: ( a ) The requirement described at § 570.200(a)(3) that, consistent with the primary objective of the Act, not less than 70 percent of the aggregate amount of CDBG funds received by the recipient shall be used over the period specified in its certification for activities that benefit low and moderate income persons;
( b ) The requirement described at § 570.200(a)(2) that each CDBG assisted activity meets the criteria for one or more of the national objectives described at § 570.208;
( c ) All other activity eligibility requirements defined in subpart C of this part;
( d ) For entitlement grants and non-entitlement CDBG grants in Hawaii, the submission requirements of 24 CFR part 91 and the displacement policy requirements at § 570.606;
( e ) For HUD-administered Small Cities grants in New York, the citizen participation requirements at § 570.431, the amendment requirements at § 570.427, and the displacement policy requirements of § 570.606;
( f ) For Insular Areas Program grants only, the application and amendment requirements at § 570.440, the citizen participation requirements at § 570.441, the displacement policy requirements of § 570.606, and the lead-based paint requirements of 24 CFR 35.940;
( g ) The grant administration requirements described in subpart J;
( h ) Other applicable laws and program requirements described in subpart K; and
( i ) Where applicable, the requirements pertaining to loan guarantees (subpart M) and urban renewal completions (subpart N).
[53 FR 34466, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 1917, Jan. 5, 1995; 60 FR 56917, Nov. 9, 1995; 72 FR 12536, Mar. 15, 2007; 72 FR 46371, Aug. 17, 2007]
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Series 25-2004 (B) L.P. (the "Partnership")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek,
Chief Executive Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.
 
 By:
              /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
              Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
              March
      31, 2008