alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11
 (AHCCCS LOGO)
    
    ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST
CONTAINMENT SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIONDIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE
SECTION A: CONTRACT
 1. AMENDMENT
    
    2. CONTRACT
    
    3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
    
    4. PROGRAMNUMBER:
    
    NO.:
    

AMENDMENT:2
    
    YH09-0001-04
    
    January 15, 2009
    
    DHCM  ACUTE
  Health Choice Arizona  410 N. 44TH Street, Suite 900
Phoenix, AZ 85008
   A.
    
    Added to Paragraph 58, Coordination of Benefits, the following
language to the end of the paragraph:AHCCCS has developed a process and agreement with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona
(BCBSAZ) to receive both historic and current BCBSAZ coverage data.Based on this information, AHCCCS will be submitting claims on behalf of AHCCCS
Contractors for services reimbursed for dates of services 1/15/06 through 3/31/08.
From the monies recovered, AHCCCS will disburse 50% to the Contractor and 50% to the
Agency for recoveries of non-TWG, non-PPC, non-Reinsurance related claims. For these
claims, AHCCCS will withhold 12% of the disbursement to the Contractor to compensate
the vendor recovering the funds. AHCCCS will retain 100% of any BCBSAZ recoveries
related to PPC, TWG and Reinsurance-related claims. The Contractor is restricted
from recouping any funds for BCBSAZ liability for the period of 1/15/06- 3/31/08.
However, the Contractor is responsible for coordination of benefits from 4/1/08
forward.
  NOTE:Please sign and date all copies and
then return one executed original to:
    
    Mark HeldSr. Procurement SpecialistAHCCCS Contracts701 E. Jefferson St., MD 5700Phoenix, AZ 85034




---



##### 



8. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT NOT HERETOFORE
CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL EFFECT.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO SIGN THEIR NAMES IN
AGREEMENT
 9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE:
    

10. SIGNATURE OF AHCCCSA CONTRACTING
OFFICER:/s/ Carolyn Rose
    
    /s/ Michael VeitTYPED NAME: CAROLYN ROSE
    
    MICHAEL VEITTITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    CONTRACTS&PURCHASING
ADMINISTRATORDATE: 1-20-2009
    
    DATE: 1/12/2009
### §1309. Coast Guard: notices to mariners and other special publications

The Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating may authorize the printing of notices to mariners and other special publications of the Coast Guard in such editions as the interests of the Government and of the public require.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1267; Pub. L. 109–241, title IX, §902(d), July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 567.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §213 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §89, 28 Stat. 622; Mar. 13, 1896, No. 23, 29 Stat. 466; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §§4, 10, 32 Stat. 826, 829; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 421, §4, 43 Stat. 1106; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. II, §2(a), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1432; Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, §§1, 20, 63 Stat. 496, 561; Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, 80 Stat. 931).

This section incorporates applicable parts of the third sentence of the second paragraph of former section 213. The balance will be found in sections 1102, 1116, 1302, 1308, 1310, 1336 of the revision.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–241 substituted "Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating" for "Secretary of the Department of Transportation".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
```

[House Report 105-57]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-57
_______________________________________________________________________

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

   April 16, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 117]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 117, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides that suspensions will be in order 
on Wednesday, April 23, 1997, and on Thursday, April 24, 1997. 
It further provides that matters to be considered under 
suspension will be announced from the House Floor at least one 
hour prior to consideration. Finally, the resolution provides 
that the Speaker or his designee will consult with the Minority 
Leader or his designee on any suspension considered under this 
resolution.
```
### §184. System, group, or regional boards of adjustment

The disputes between an employee or group of employees and a carrier or carriers by air growing out of grievances, or out of the interpretation or application of agreements concerning rates of pay, rules, or working conditions, including cases pending and unadjusted on April 10, 1936 before the National Labor Relations Board, shall be handled in the usual manner up to and including the chief operating officer of the carrier designated to handle such disputes; but, failing to reach an adjustment in this manner, the disputes may be referred by petition of the parties or by either party to an appropriate adjustment board, as hereinafter provided, with a full statement of the facts and supporting data bearing upon the disputes.

It shall be the duty of every carrier and of its employees, acting through their representatives, selected in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, to establish a board of adjustment of jurisdiction not exceeding the jurisdiction which may be lawfully exercised by system, group, or regional boards of adjustment, under the authority of section 153 of this title.

Such boards of adjustment may be established by agreement between employees and carriers either on any individual carrier, or system, or group of carriers by air and any class or classes of its or their employees; or pending the establishment of a permanent National Board of Adjustment as hereinafter provided. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent said carriers by air, or any class or classes of their employees, both acting through their representatives selected in accordance with provisions of this subchapter, from mutually agreeing to the establishment of a National Board of Adjustment of temporary duration and of similarly limited jurisdiction.

(May 20, 1926, ch. 347, §204, as added Apr. 10, 1936, ch. 166, 49 Stat. 1189.)
#### Illinois Corrugated Metal Company, appellant, v. Commissioner of Highways of Tremont Township, appellee.

Assumpsit for price of metal culverts sold. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. T. N. Green, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed April 23, 1923.

L. P. Dunkelberg and William A. Potts, for appellant. J. M. Powers, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





i)  **CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT**


**PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC,
      Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig
      A.
      Zabala, as President of the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  March
      23,
      2007


/s/ Craig A. ZabalaCraig
                A. ZabalaPresident
                (Principal
                  Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No. FAA
- 

## ')._0 

# l (,**~** 

# (t - 0 

## OJ. 

# -Ak:) Directorate Identifier: .,. AD Add the work hours, parts cost , and number of U.S. registered products to the table below
. When you are finished , click on the "Update Fields " button to**a~.<tomatically** fill in the totals. Update Fie lds 

# I
Estimated Costs : Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$ 85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Inspection, repair, etc . Inspection and 

### 2 

### 0 350 Lubrication { I

l I 

## ,, , I { l 

### ' J ' 

## ., 

## ,, l I
I
I ' ill I J I '

' , I '' i I 

### ., The known number ofproducts in compliance: 

### Number Total Costs ofcompliance for U.S. fleet: $ 59 ,5 00.00 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $Warranty On-Condition Costs : 

## @ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e .g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup) Replace Rod End 

### 4 

### $30.00 

### 8Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Parts cost is per Rod End. Executive Order 12866 : 

### Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

# G No 

### *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD significant? 

# G No 

### *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act : 

### YES* 0 NO 0

YES* 0 NO 0

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. 

# G No 

### YESD NOD Explanation : Does not meet threshold costs. Intrastate Aviation in Alaska : 

### This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? 

# G No 

### YES* 0 NO 0 *Explanation :



### 9
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form
10-K/A, of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ JAMES A. CALDERJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
§ 214.105 Preliminary application process. ( a ) *Submission.* All agencies must complete the forms prescribed by HUD and submit the application and all supporting documentation to HUD. Agencies with branches or affiliates for which the parent entity exercises control over the quality and type of housing counseling services rendered must submit a single application for approval.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), SHFAs are not required to submit an application for HUD approval. However, to participate in HUD's Housing Counseling program, SHFAs must either submit a request and provide HUD with a list of affiliates, if applicable, and assure that they meet all program requirements, or submit a request through such other application procedure as HUD may periodically announce in the Federal Register or other informational sources.
§ 213.252 Definitions. The definitions contained in § 213.1 shall apply to this subpart and in addition the following terms shall have the meaning indicated. ( a ) *Contract of Insurance* means the agreement evidenced by endorsement of the credit instrument by the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative and includes the terms, conditions and provisions of this subpart and of the National Housing Act.
( b ) *Insured mortgage* means a mortgage which has been insured by the endorsement of the credit instrument by the Commissioner.
( c ) *Mortgage* means such a first lien upon real estate and other property as is commonly given to secure advances on, or the unpaid purchase price of, real estate under the laws of the State, district or territory in which the real estate is located, together with the credit instrument or instruments, if any, secured thereby. In any instance where an operating loss loan is involved, the term shall include both the original mortgage and the instrument securing the operating loss loan.
( d ) *Mortgagee* means the original lender under a mortgage, its successors and such of its assigns as are approved by the Commissioner, and includes the holders of the credit instruments issued under a trust indenture, mortgage or deed of trust pursuant to which such holders act by and through a trustee therein named.
( e ) *Mortgagor* means the original borrower under a mortgage and its successors and such of its assigns as are approved by the Commissioner.
( f ) *Project Mortgage* means a blanket mortgage insured under section 213 of the Act, covering a group of not less than five single-family dwellings.
### §1908. American Antiquarian Society to receive certain publications

One copy of the public journals of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, and of the documents published under the orders of the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively, shall be transmitted to the Executive of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for the use and benefit of the American Antiquarian Society of the Commonwealth.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1285.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §88 (Dec. 1, 1814, No. 7, 3 Stat. 248).
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Artcraft V,      Inc. |

| Date:      March 11, 2008                   |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
| Artcraft      V,  Inc.            |
|                                        |
| By:      /s/      Li Te Xiao                |
| Li      Te XiaoChief      Executive Officer |
### **CHAPTER 20—RESERVATIONS AND GRANTS TO STATES FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES**

Sec.
851.
Deficiencies in grants to State by reason of settlements, etc., on designated sections generally.
852.
Selections to supply deficiencies of school lands.
852a.
Applications for unsurveyed lands; regulations; acreage requirements.
852b.
Survey of lands prior to transfer; time for survey; availability of funds; lands suitable for transfer.
853.
Selections in Utah to supply deficiencies of school lands.
854.
Selections in New Mexico to supply deficiencies of school lands.
855.
Omitted.
856.
Selection of school lands on ceded Indian reservations.
857.
Grant to new States.
858.
Grants to counties for seats of justice.
859.
Fee simple to pass in all grants.
860.
Repealed.
861.
Preference right of selection granted certain Western States; bona fide settlers.
862.
Omitted.
863.
Survey of lands granted to certain Western States.
864.
Survey of land grants to Florida.
865.
Confirmation of certain lands selected by California.
866.
Exchange of cut over land in Montana.
867.
Omitted.
868.
Representation of Indian claimants in suits to determine right to school lands.
869.
Disposal of lands for public or recreational purposes.
869–1.
Sale or lease to State or nonprofit organization; reservation of mineral deposits; termination of lease for nonuse.
869–2.
Conditions of transfer by grantee; solid waste disposal.
869–3.
Authority for transfers; applicability of section 869–2 to prior patents; termination of restrictions.
869–4.
Disposition of moneys received from or on account of revested Oregon and California Railroad grant lands or reconveyed Coos Bay Wagon Road grant lands.
869a.
Repealed.
870.
Grants of land in aid of common or public schools; extension to those mineral in character; effect of leases.
871.
Certain grants and laws unaffected.
871a.
Repealed.
872.
Conveyances to United States in connection with applications for amendment of patented entries or for exchange of land, etc.; withdrawal or rejection of applications; reconveyances.
873.
Lands granted for erecting public buildings; purpose of grant.
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Bruce J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Emergent Group
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  May 14, 2004                         /s/ Bruce J. Haber
                                            ------------------
                                            Bruce J. Haber,
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 242.84 Previous participation and compliance requirements.

The requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 200, subpart H, apply to this program.
#### Sylvia Beck et al., Respondents, v 200 Wyndham Associates, Appellant.

a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 22, 1977, which denied its motion for leave to file a jury demand *nunc pro tunc.*Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. It appears that the jury demand was at most six days late under the provisions of CPLR 4102 (subd [a]). The delay of some 33 days between the attempted filing of the jury demand and the return date of the motion was not inordinate. In our opinion, these "facts indicate not only the absence of any act constituting a waiver of the right to a jury trial—an indispensable requisite to a finding that the right has been waived *(Bakopoulos v. Bank of Athens Trust Co.,*285 N. Y. 451; *Schwartz v. Sunlight Apts.,*274 App. Div. 901; *Morabito v. Solomon,*278 App. Div. 657; *Robertson v. United Plastering,*15 A D 2d 672); but on the contrary, show affirmatively a clear intention to have the jury trial” *(Denig v Seelig,*17 AD2d 948, 949). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th 

day of April, A.D. 2018, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined; 

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Troy Michael Robino, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-17-00173-CR

Trial Court No. 45775-B

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Troy Michael Robino, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 6th day of June, A.D. 2018.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk