alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, John A. Witham, certify that:

1)   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Metris Companies Inc.
     "Registrant";

2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5)   The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board
     of:

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ John A. Witham John A. Witham
---------------------------------
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          58,748
<SECURITIES>                                    16,535
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,949
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,184
<PP&E>                                          52,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 353,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,524
<BONDS>                                          1,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   353,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   169
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,015
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,428
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,428
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44


</TABLE>
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Please the attached Closeout Letter to Virgin America (Docket No. FAA-2013-0128) that would have continued to provide Virgin America relief from the requirement to include Atropine in an Emergency Medical Kit (EMK).
§ 581.7 Determination of availability. ( a ) Within 45 days after receipt of a letter from HUD pursuant to § 581.4(a), each landholding agency must transmit to HUD a statement of one of the following: ( 1 ) In the case of unutilized or underutilized property: ( i ) An intention to declare the property excess,
( ii ) An intention to make the property available for use to assist the homeless, or
( iii ) The reasons why the property cannot be declared excess or made available for use to assist the homeless. The reasons given must be different than those listed as suitability criteria in § 581.6.
( 2 ) In the case of excess property which had previously been reported to GSA: ( i ) A statement that there is no compelling Federal need for the property, and that, therefore, the property will be determined surplus; or
( ii ) A statement that there is a further and compelling Federal need for the property (including a full explanation of such need) and that, therefore, the property is not presently available for use to assist the homeless.
### §1015. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–88, title III, §329(2), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 952

Section, Pub. L. 96–254, title I, §120, May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 97–216, title I, §101, July 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 188, related to Interstate Commerce Commission ordering directed service over passenger commuter railroad lines that were in operation on Mar. 1, 1980, and had ceased to be in operation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal by Pub. L. 104–88 effective Jan. 1, 1996, see section 2 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1301 of Title 49, Transportation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              58,012
<SECURITIES>                                        27,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                       48,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,195
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   159,977
<PP&E>                                              45,455
<DEPRECIATION>                                       9,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     340,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               61,748
<BONDS>                                              1,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             3,845
<OTHER-SE>                                         269,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       340,557
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   114,841
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       62,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    34,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     20,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8,620
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 12,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12,236
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.32


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry Lewis, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 794]—

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered December 23, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated criminal contempt, criminal contempt in the first degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal trespass in the second degree and stedking in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of various crimes arising out of incidents involving his ex-girlfriend, defendant contends that County Court erred in admitting a statement he made to the police on the ground that he was in custody and had not received *Miranda*warnings. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that he was not in custody when he was questioned (see *generally People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, 589 [1969], *cert denied*400 US 851 [1970]). The statement was made in response to a question that was investigatory in nature and thus was not the product of custodial interrogation requiring *Miranda*warnings (see *generally Illinois v Perkins,*496 US 292, 296 [1990]; *People v Paul-man,*5 NY3d 122, 129 [2005]). Contrary to defendant’s further contentions, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence and the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence (s*ee generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Martoche, J.P., Smith, Centra, Lunn and Feradotto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND  IN THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN  ITS ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE  TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                              61,713
<SECURITIES>                        216,253
<RECEIVABLES>                       206,095
<ALLOWANCES>                        540
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              29,439
<DEPRECIATION>                      9,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      526,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             149,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            155
<OTHER-SE>                          145,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        526,055
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    86,962
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    61,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  12,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     13,133
<INCOME-TAX>                        5,174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 7,959
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        7,959
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.52


</TABLE>
§ 16.12 Fees. ( a ) The only fees to be charged to or collected from an individual under the provisions of this part are for copying records at the request of the individual. ( 1 ) No fees shall be charged or collected for the following: Search for and retrieval of the records; review of the records; copying at the initiative of the Department without a request from the individual; transportation of records and personnel; and first class postage.
( 2 ) It is the policy of the Department to provide an individual with one copy of each record corrected or amended pursuant to his or her request without charge as evidence of the correction or amendment.
( 3 ) As requested by the United States Civil Service Commission in its published regulations implementing the Act, the Department will charge no fee to an individual who requests copies of a personnel record covered by that Commission's Government-wide published notice of systems of records. However, when such records are voluminous and the cost of copying would be in excess of five dollars ($5) the Department may, in its discretion, charge a fee.
( b ) The copying fees prescribed by paragraph (a) of this section are: $0.10 Each copy of each page, up to 81 ⁄ 2′′ × 14′′ made by photocopy or similar process. $0.20 Each page of computer printout without regard to the number of carbon copies concurrently printed.
( c ) Payment of fees under this section shall be made in cash, or preferably by check or money order payable to the “Treasurer of the United States.” Payment shall be delivered or sent to the office stated in the billing notice or, if none is stated, to the Privacy Act Officer processing the request. Payment may be required in the form of a certified check in appropriate circumstances. Postage stamps will not be accepted.
( d ) A copying fee totaling $1 or less shall be waived, but the copying fees for contemporaneous requests by the same individual shall be aggregated to determine the total fee. A copying fee shall not be charged or collected, or alternatively, it may be reduced when such action is determined by the Privacy Act Officer to be in the public interest.
( e ) Special and additional services provided at the request of the individual, such as certification or authentication, postal insurance and special mailing arrangement costs, will be charged to the individual in accordance with other published regulations of the Department pursuant to statute (for example, 31 U.S.C. 433a).
( f ) This section applies only to individuals making requests under this part. All other persons shall remain subject to fees and charges prescribed by other and appropriate authorities.
[40 FR 39729, Aug. 28, 1975, as amended at 42 FR 29479, June 9, 1977]
#### § 3286.601 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart G is to set out the requirements that apply to a retailer with respect to the federal installation requirements applicable to new manufactured homes that the retailer sells or leases and that will be installed in states that do not have qualifying installation programs. These requirements are in addition to other requirements that apply to retailers of manufactured homes pursuant to other parts of this chapter.
#### § 3280.215 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75745, Sept. 16, 2024.
## Martin , Michae l (OST) ^O T- QS T- '^^oo^, - M' AS \ From : Joe l Beze k [joelbezek@gmail.com ] .- ^ -^ r•• ^"'-Tq'Q' i Sent : Wednesday , Apri l 21,201 0 7:3 3 P M •rMU;; ; yii- ' • To : EAS(OST ) Subject : Fwd : Johnstow n 

### Hello , I wa s diasppointe d t o rea d i n th e TRIBUN E DEMOCRA Tthi s mornin g th e articl e abou t Colga n Air . T o rene wth e Colga n Ai rcontac t i s a mistake :

• Ou rairpor t ha s see n a DECLIN E i n it s us e sinc e thei rcontrac t bega n rathe rtha n a n INCREASE . • Ou rchoice s ar e limite d wit h Colga n Air . • Th e othe rcarrier s ar e "interesting " choic e tha t ar e wort h a secon d glance . What' s th e downside ? 

### A s I'v e heard : Th e definitio no f insanity i s doin g somethin g th e sam e way an dexpectin g adifferent results . Thi s choic e i s acas e i npoint . Joe l A . Beze k Westmon t
§ 241.505 Processing of applications and required fees. ( a ) *Preapplication conference.* The local HUD Office will determine whether participation in a preapplication conference is required as a condition to submission of an initial application for a firm commitment for insurance of an energy savings improvement loan on a project. An application for a firm commitment for insurance must be submitted by both the project sponsor and an approved lender. Applications shall be submitted to the local HUD Office on HUD-approved forms. No application will be considered unless accompanied by all exhibits required by the form and program handbooks.
( b ) *Application for firm commitment.* An application for a firm commitment shall be accompanied by the payment of an application fee of $5 per thousand dollars of the requested loan amount to be insured.
( c ) *Cross-reference.* The provisions of paragraphs (e) (Inspection fee), (f)(1) (Fee on increases), (g) (Reopening of expired commitments), (i) (Refund of fees), and (j) (Fees not required) of § 200.40 of this chapter apply to applications submitted under subpart E of this part.
[61 FR 14416, Apr. 1, 1996]
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2 10-K

EXHIBIT 99.1









THE
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON



Officer’s
Certificate










March 18, 2024



MERRILL
LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
One Bryant Park
4th Floor – Structured Credit Trading
New York, New York 10036



PREFERREDPLUS,
PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE



The
undersigned, Terrence White, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation
(the “Trustee”), hereby certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated
February 20, 1998 between MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC., as depositor (the “Depositor”) and the Trustee, as successor
to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the “Securities Intermediary”),
in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities Intermediary for each trust
series listed in the attached schedule.



| | Very truly yours,
    The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly 
    The Bank of New York), as Trustee |       
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------
| | By:                                                                                                | /s/   
| |                                                                                                    | Name: 
| |                                                                                                    | Title:















SCHEDULE



PPLUS
Trust Series GSC-2

INDEXPLUS Trust Series 2003-1
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****LEHD newsletter [electronic resource].
 
Vol. 1 No. 1
Vol. 1 No. 2
Vol. 2 No. 1
Vol. 2 No. 2
Vol. 3 No. 1
Vol. 3 No. 2
 
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.2:L 85/
Item Number:0146 (online)
CGP System Number:000613083
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 11, 2017********
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricardo Santiago DeJesus, Also Known as Juan A. Cotto Rivera, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 792]

by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J), entered February 1, 2005. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) to vacate the judgment convicting him of, inter alia, attempted murder in the first degree (two counts).

*1197It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) to vacate the judgment convicting him of, inter alia, two counts of attempted murder in the first degree *(People v Dejesus,*236 AD2d 791, *lv denied*89 NY2d 1091, 91 NY2d 872 [1997]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court properly denied the motion without a hearing. Defendant contended in support of the motion that he was denied effective assistance of counsel but his submissions, which do not include an affidavit from trial counsel, are insufficient to warrant a hearing with respect to his allegation that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him during plea negotiations of his possible sentencing exposure upon conviction after trial *(see generally People v Rosario,*309 AD2d 537, 538 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 579 [2003]; *People v Stewart,*295 AD2d 249, 249-250 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 540 [2002], *cert denied*538 US 1003 [2003]; *cf. People v Reynolds,*309 AD2d 976 [2003]; *People v Perron,*273 AD2d 549, 550 [2000]). Present—Gorski, J.P, Martoche, Centra, Lunn and Green, JJ.