alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1115. Annual reports: time of delivery by Director of the Government Publishing Office to Congress

The annual reports of the Executive Departments and the accompanying documents shall be delivered by the Director of the Government Publishing Office to the proper officer of each House of Congress at its first meeting. Other reports of the Executive Departments shall be so delivered on or before the third Wednesday next after the meeting of Congress or as soon after as may be practicable.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1263; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code 1964 ed., §212 (part) (R.S. 3810).

This section incorporates only the first sentence of former section 212. The balance will be found in section 1114 of this revision.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in section catchline and text.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hector Cruz, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered on or about September 12, 2005, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
#### Stella W. Mandl, administratrix of the estate of Cornelia Wolff, deceased, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,775.

Action against city for damages for personal injuries from a fall caused by defective sidewalk. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo Pam, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Rehearing denied July 3, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, and William H. Devenish, City Attorney, for appellant; Robert H. Farrell, of counsel. Burt A. Crowe and Oscar M. Wolff, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 586.45 Disposal of buildings and property. ( a ) *Public benefit transfer screening.* Not later than the LRA's submission of its redevelopment plan to DoD and HUD, the Military Department will conduct an official public benefit transfer screening in accordance with the Federal Property Management Regulations (41 CFR part 101-47.303-2) based upon the uses identified in the redevelopment plan. Federal sponsoring agencies shall notify eligible applicants that any request for property must be consistent with the uses identified in the redevelopment plan. At the request of the LRA, the Military Department may conduct the official State and local public benefit screening at any time after the publication of available property described at § 586.20(b).
( b ) *Environmental analysis.* Prior to disposal of any real property, the Military Department shall, consistent with NEPA and section 2905 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as amended (10 U.S.C. 2687 *note*), complete an environmental impact analysis of all reasonable disposal alternatives. The Military Department shall consult with the LRA throughout the environmental impact analysis process to ensure both that the LRA is provided the most current environmental information available concerning the installation, and that the Military Department receives the most current information available concerning the LRA's redevelopment plans for the installation.
( c ) *Disposal.* Upon receipt of a notice of approval of an application from HUD under § 586.35(c)(1) or § 586.35(d)(2), DoD shall dispose of buildings and property in accordance with the record of decision or other decision document prepared under § 586.45(b). Disposal of buildings and property to be used as homeless assistance facilities shall be to either the LRA or directly to the representative(s) of the homeless and shall be without consideration. Upon receipt of a notice from HUD under § 586.40(b), DoD will dispose of the buildings and property at the installation in consultation with HUD and the LRA.
( d ) *LRA's responsibility.* The LRA shall be responsible for the implementation of and compliance with legally binding agreements under the application.
( e ) *Reversions to the LRA.* If a building or property reverts to the LRA under a legally binding agreement under the application, the LRA shall take appropriate actions to secure, to the maximum extent practicable, the utilization of the building or property by other homeless representatives to assist the homeless. An LRA may not be required to utilize the building or property to assist the homeless.
### **CHAPTER 22—CONRAIL PRIVATIZATION**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
1301.
Findings.
1302.
Purposes.
1303.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CONRAIL

#### Part A—Sale of Conrail

1311.
Preparation for public offering.
1312.
Public offering.
1313.
Fees.

#### Part B—Other Matters Relating to Sale

1321.
Rail service obligations.
1322.
Ownership limitations.
1323.
Board of Directors.
1324.
Certain enforcement relief.

#### Part C—Miscellaneous Provisions

1341.
Abolition of United States Railway Association.
1342.
Exemption from liability.
1343.
Charter amendment.
1344.
Status of Conrail after sale.
1345.
Effect on contracts.
1346.
Resolution of certain issues.
1347.
Tax treatment of Conrail public sale.
### §771. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1029

Section, R.S. §2411, related to compensation for surveying by the day instead of by the mile in Oregon and California.
### §390uu. Waiver of sovereign immunity

Consent is given to join the United States as a necessary party defendant in any suit to adjudicate, confirm, validate, or decree the contractual rights of a contracting entity and the United States regarding any contract executed pursuant to Federal reclamation law. The United States, when a party to any suit, shall be deemed to have waived any right to plead that it is not amenable thereto by reason of its sovereignty, and shall be subject to judgments, orders, and decrees of the court having jurisdiction, and may obtain review thereof, in the same manner and to the same extent as a private individual under like circumstances. Any suit pursuant to this section may be brought in any United States district court in the State in which the land involved is situated.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §221, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1271.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Federal reclamation law, referred to in text, is defined in section 390aa of this title.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection
with the Amended Annual Report of FalconTarget, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Thomas Kirchner, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: July 30, 2009 | /s/ THOMAS KIRCHNER                                            
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | By: Thomas Kirchner                                            
|                     | Its: Chief Executive
			Officer and Principal Financial Officer



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FalconTarget, Inc. and will be retained by FalconTarget, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### LEVI et al., Respondents, v. McCALDIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Bernard Levi and others against James McCaldin. L. S. Gove, for appellant. L. Moschowitz, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of ORBCOMM Global, L.P.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               State or Other Jurisdiction
      Name of Subsidiary                                    of Organization or Incorporation
      ------------------                                    --------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>
   ORBCOMM USA, L.P.                                                    Delaware

   ORBCOMM International Partners, L.P.                                 Delaware

   ORBCOMM Global Capital Corp.                                         Delaware

   ORBCOMM Corporation                                                  Delaware

   ORBCOMM Investment Corporation                                       Delaware

   ORBCOMM Enterprises Corporation                                      Delaware

   ORBCOMM Enterprises, L.P.                                            Delaware

   Dolphin Information Services, Inc.                                   Delaware

   Dolphin Software Services ULC                                        Nova Scotia, Canada
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            223,033
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,502,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                      100,000
<INVENTORY>                                     3,420,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,263,251
<PP&E>                                          4,965,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,269,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,453,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,439,631
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,625,000
<PREFERRED>                                     1,000,000
<COMMON>                                            4,800
<OTHER-SE>                                        317,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11,453,542
<SALES>                                        22,524,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,524,222
<CGS>                                           7,829,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,266,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                276,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,156,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                      470,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      686,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                          1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.81


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
   
  One Bryant Park
  4th Floor  Structured Credit Trading
  New York, NY 10036
  The
undersigned, Pierre Boutros, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the
Trustee), hereby certifies in such capacity that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for Trust
Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the Depositor) and the
Trustee, as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the
Securities Intermediary), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and
the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached schedule.


Very truly yours,
The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as TrusteeBy:
      /s/
      Pierre BoutrosName:
      Pierre BoutrosTitle:
      Vice President


---










---
§ 1003.304 Funding process. ( a ) *Notification.* Area ONAPs will notify applicants of the approval or disapproval of their applications. Grant amounts offered may reflect adjustments made by the Area ONAPs in accordance with § 1003.100(b)(2).
( b ) *Grant award.* ( 1 ) As soon as the Area ONAP determines that the applicant has complied with any pre-award requirements and absent information which would alter the threshold determinations under § 1003.302, the grant will be awarded. The regulations become part of the grant agreement.
( 2 ) All grants shall be conditioned upon the completion of all environmental obligations and approval of release of funds by HUD in accordance with the requirements of part 58 of this title and, in particular, subpart J of part 58 of this title, except as otherwise provided in part 58 of this title.
( 3 ) HUD may impose other grant conditions where additional actions or approvals are required before the use of funds.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB Control No. 2577-0191)
EXHIBIT 99.1
   
  
  The
undersigned, Maryann Joseph, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York), a New York corporation (the
Trustee), hereby certifies in such capacity that, based on her knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all
material respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the Standard Terms for Trust
Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the Depositor) and the
Trustee, as successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities intermediary (the
Securities Intermediary), in each case as amended by a series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and
the Securities Intermediary for each trust series listed in the attached schedule.


Very truly yours,
The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly

        The Bank of New York), as TrusteeBy:
      /s/
Maryann JosephName:
      Maryann JosephTitle:
      Vice President




---






---
### §758. Delivery of patent contingent on refund of cost of survey

In all cases of the survey of private land claims the cost of the same shall be refunded to the Treasury by the owner before the delivery of the patent.

(Mar. 3, 1885, ch. 360, 23 Stat. 499.)
§ 206.203 Providing information*.* ( a ) *Statements of account activity.* The mortgagee shall provide to the borrower a monthly statement regarding the activity of the mortgage for each month, as well as for the calendar year. The statement shall summarize the total principal amount which has been paid to the borrower under the mortgage during that calendar year, the MIP paid to the Commissioner and charged to the borrower, the total amount of deferred interest added to the outstanding loan balance, the total outstanding loan balance, and the current principal limit. The mortgagee shall include an accounting of all payments for property charges. The statement shall be provided to the borrower monthly until the mortgage is paid in full by the borrower. The mortgagee shall provide the borrower with a new payment plan every time it recalculates monthly payments or the payment option is changed. The statements shall be in a format acceptable to the Commissioner.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Servicing—Providing information.* ( 1 ) Mortgagees shall provide loan information to borrowers and arrange for individual loan consultation on request. The mortgagee must establish written procedures and controls to assure prompt responses to inquiries. One or more of the following means of making information readily available to borrowers is required: ( i ) A servicing office staffed with competent personnel located within 200 miles of the property, capable of providing timely responses to requests for information. Complete records need not be maintained in such an office if the staff is able to secure needed information and pass it on to the borrower.
( ii ) Toll-free telephone service at an office capable of providing needed information.
( 2 ) ( i ) All borrowers must be informed of and reminded annually of the system available for obtaining answers to loan inquiries and the office from which needed information may be obtained. Toll-free telephone service need not be provided to a borrower other than at the office designated to serve the borrower nor other than from the immediate vicinity of the security property.
( ii ) The mortgagee shall provide the borrower with the telephone number where the borrower may speak to employee(s) specifically designated by the mortgagee or its servicer to address inquiries concerning mortgages insured under this part. Such information shall be provided annually and whenever the servicer or the designated employee (or employee group) changes.
( 3 ) Mortgagees must respond to FHA requests for information concerning individual accounts.
ex10_53.htm









Exhibit 10.53


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT







The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the "Employer") and Joan B. Davidson (the "Employee") wish to amend the Employee's Employment and Non-Competition Agreement dated April 1, 2007 (the "Agreement") to (i) bring the Agreement into compliance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and other authoritative guidance issued under that section, pursuant to IRS Notice 2010-6, and (ii) provide additional severance benefits.







Accordingly, the Agreement is amended as follows:







1.  Effective September 1, 2010, a new item (E) is added to Section 6(e)(i) to read as follows:







"and (E) payment of reasonable expenses related to career transition services (outplacement) with a mutually agreed upon provider, in accordance with the Employer's outplacement schedule of benefits."







2.  Effective September 1, 2010, paragraph (ii) of Section 6(e) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:







"(ii) The Employer shall not reduce the amount payable under the provisions of Section 6(e)(i)  if the Employee accepts other employment during the Severance Period."







3.   Effective April 1, 2007, Section 10(g) – Arbitration of Disputes – is amended by deleting the sentence that was added to the end of that Section by Amendment No. 1 and by replacing it in its entirety with the following new language:







"The Employee's right to reimbursement of expenses by the Employer under this Section is available to the Employee during the Employee's lifetime.  The amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement during one calendar year shall not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement in any other calendar year. Any reimbursement of an eligible expense shall be made to the Employee by the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense was incurred."







4.  Effective April 1, 2007, Section 10(i) – Governing Law – is amended by adding the following new sentence to the end of that Section:







"To the extent Code section 409A applies, the terms of this Agreement shall be interpreted as necessary to comply with the requirements of Code section 409A."







In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective as specified herein.








	
ATTEST/WITNESS:

	  	
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	 	/s/ John A. Saxton
	  	  	  	  	  
	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	
Print Name:

	
John A. Saxton


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
Date:

	
August 31, 2010


	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	/s/ Joan B. Davidson
	  	  	  	
Joan B. Davidson


	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
Date:

	
August 31, 2010
#### § 203.316 Termination by prepayment of mortgage.

The contract of insurance shall be terminated if the mortgage is paid in full prior to its maturity.
### §985. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §2483, authorized the issuance of patents to purchasers or locators who have made entries on public lands claimed as swamp lands.
EXHIBIT 10.13  AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED STOCK
UNIT AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS  WHEREAS,Interline Brands, Inc.
(the Company) has previously made grants of deferred stock units to
non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of the Interline Brands, Inc. 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan (as heretofore amended from time to time, the Plan) and
award agreements thereunder (the DSU
Agreements);  WHEREAS, Section 11(t) of the Plan
provides that if the Committee (each capitalized but undefined term shall have
the meaning ascribed to such term in the Plan) determines that any amounts
payable under the Plan will be taxable to a Participant under Section 409A
of the Code and related Treasury guidance prior to payment to such Participant
of such amount, the Company may adopt such amendments to the Plan and Awards
and appropriate policies and procedures that the Committee determines necessary
or appropriate to preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided
by the Plan and Awards thereunder and/or take such other actions as the
Committee determines necessary or appropriate to avoid or limit the imposition
of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Code; and  WHEREAS,the Committee has determined that it is
necessary and appropriate to make the amendments contained herein.  NOW,
THEREFORE,each outstanding DSU Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the date hereof:  1.             Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the DSU
Agreement, a Change in Control shall not be a distribution event thereunder
unless such event satisfies the definition of a change in the ownership or
effective control of a corporation, or a change in the ownership of a
substantial portion of the assets of a corporation pursuant to Section 409A
of the Code and any Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.  2.             The phrase as soon as reasonably practicable (or words
of similar import), each time it occurs in the DSU Agreement, shall be
interpreted to mean (if not followed by a more definitive time for payment):  as soon as reasonably practicable (but in no
event later than thirty (30) days).  3.             Continuing Effect of the Agreements.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the
provisions of each Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.  4.             Governing Law. 
This amendment shall be governed by, construed under, and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York applicable to agreements made
and to be wholly performed within that State, without regard to its conflict of
laws provisions or any conflict of laws provisions of any other jurisdiction
which would cause the application of any law other than that of the State of
New York.  INTERLINE
  BRANDS, INC.By:
  /s/ Michael J. GrebeName:  Michael J. GrebeTitle:   Chairman, CEO & President