Date: November 17, 2011

Subject: Costs and Environmental and Energy Impacts for Subpart S Risk and 

Technology Review

EPA Contract No. EP-D-11-084; Work Assignment No. 0-03

From: Thomas Holloway

Katie Hanks

Corey Gooden

To: John Bradfield

Bill Schrock

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

I. Introduction

Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum 

achievable control technology (MACT) standards and determine if additional standards are 

needed to reduce residual risks from the remaining hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions 

from the category. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT 

standards, as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control 

technologies. The section 112(f)(2) residual risk review and section 112(d)(6) technology review 

are to be done 8 years after promulgation.

The national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for the pulp and 

paper industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart S) were promulgated in 1998 and are due for review 

under CAA sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6). To address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club, the 

subpart S risk and technology review (RTR) package will be proposed by December 15, 2011.

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the estimated costs and environmental 

and energy impacts associated with the regulatory options under consideration for the subpart S

RTR proposal. Section II discusses the derivation of the costs and impacts associated with the 

kraft condensates regulatory options. Section III presents the costs associated with the proposed 

repeat HAP emissions testing requirement. Finally, section IV summarizes the nationwide costs

and impacts.
2

II. Cost and Impacts Estimates for Kraft Condensates Regulatory Options

A. Kraft Condensates Regulatory Options

The kraft condensates standards in subpart S limit the HAP concentration in various 

process liquids (e.g., condensates from pulping equipment). Limiting emissions from these 

process liquids reduces emissions from the handling and reuse of these liquids and wastewater 

treatment. The condensates are treated by one of the following methods:

1. Route the condensates to equipment that meets the subpart S kraft pulping vent gas 

standards; or

2. Route the condensates to biological treatment/steam stripper or other control device that 

meets one of the following equivalent requirements: 

• Reduce total HAP by at least 92 weight-percent; or

• For mills without bleaching, either remove at least 6.6 pounds (lb) total HAP/ton 

oven-dried pulp (ODP), or meet 210 parts per million by weight (ppmw) total HAP at 

control device outlet; or

• For mills with bleaching, either remove at least 10.2 lb total HAP/ton ODP, or meet

330 ppmw total HAP at control device outlet.

Data from industry responses to Part I of the 2011 pulp and paper survey were reviewed 

to determine the performance level of mills subject to the kraft condensates standards. The Part I 

survey requested information on the control measures and compliance options used by mills to 

meet the kraft condensates standards. Mills typically use either steam stripping of contaminated 

condensates or hard piping of condensates to biological wastewater treatment. Some mills may 

use a combination of treatment methods. A total of 97 mills are currently subject to the kraft 

condensates standards. Table 1 presents a summary of the predominant kraft condensate 

treatment methods used.

Table 1. Number of Mills Using Various Condensate Treatment Methods

Treatment Method No. of mills

Biotreatment 39

Recycle 5

Stripping or stripping/recycle 43

Stripping and biotreatment 9

Thermal incinerator 1

Total 97

The regulatory options considered for the subpart S RTR include tightening the kraft 

condensates standards to reflect the current performance of technology and further reduce 

emissions associated with kraft pulping and wastewater. A series of different emission limits

were considered, including increasing the requirement to reduce HAP emissions from 92 percent 

to a higher percent reduction (e.g., 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, or 98 percent). These incremental 

emissions reductions are already being achieved by some mills, but would require upgrade or 

replacement of existing equipment by other mills. A separate memo (EPA 2011a) describes the 
3

methodology used to determine current percent reduction performance. For each incremental 

emission limit increase in the emission limit, the subset of mills currently not meeting that limit

was identified and presented in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Number of Mills Requiring Equipment Upgrades for Each Incremental

Adjustment in the Kraft Condensate Emission Reduction Limit

Percent reduction (%)

No. of mills meeting % 

reduction limit

No. of mills affected by 

incremental adjustment of limit

92 97 0

93 93 4

94 82 15

95 69 28

96 56 41

97 43 54

98 31 66

Mills recycling condensates to equipment to meet the pulping vent gas limits are subject 

to the 98 percent pulping vent gas limit (or equivalent) and were assumed not to incur any costs 

associated with adjustments to the kraft condensate emission limits. The mill operating a thermal 

incinerator also achieved greater than 98 percent control and would not be affected. Mills using a 

combination of steam stripping and biotreatment were assigned costs based on steam stripping.

B. Cost of Biological Treatment System Upgrades

Wastewater treatment plant upgrade costs were developed for mills currently using 

biological treatment. (EPA 2011a) For costing purposes, it was assumed that the wastewater 

treatment system upgrade would require an increase in system capacity proportional to the 

increase in emission limit. For example, to meet a 95 percent limit, a 10 million gallon per day 

(MM gal/d) plant would increase capacity by 0.33 MM gal/day ([10 x 95/92] – 10 ≈ 0.33).

(EPA 2011a) Wastewater treatment plant upgrade costs were based on the following cost 

equations (where MGD is millions of gallons per day).

Capital cost ($) = 5.9749 x MGD0.8228 x 1,000,000

O&M cost ($/yr) = 0.2546 x MGD0.6969 x 1,000,000

The cost equations were derived from CapdetWorks v2.5 model runs for a complete-mix 

activated sludge sludge system containing a bioreactor and secondary clarifier scaled to 2010 

dollars using Engineering News-Record (ENR) indices. CapdetWorks v2.5 is a commercially 

available software program for the preliminary design and costing of wastewater treatment 

systems. (Hydromantis 2007) The capital cost equation developed using CapdetWorks was found 

to compare reasonably well to a wastewater treatment plant cost equation from an EPA 

document (EPA 1980). No operation and maintenance (O&M) costs were included in EPA 1980. 

The O&M cost equation above was developed using CapdetWorks and includes labor, 

chemicals, materials, and energy. Total labor averaged 38 percent of the annual cost at an O&M

wage rate of $25/hr, and this information was used to calculate the annual labor hours per year
4

associated with biotreatment system upgrades. The CapdetWorks v2.5 default electricity cost of 

$0.10/kWh was used to calculate energy use (kWh) associated with the biological treatment 

system upgrades. Appendix A contains the results of the CapdetWorks v2.5 model runs for five 

facility sizes that were used to establish cost correlations. Appendix B1 presents the mill-by-mill 

costs for biological treatment system upgrades extrapolated from these model costs. 

The annualized capital costs were determined by applying a capital recovery factor of 

0.094 to the estimated capital cost. The capital recovery factor was estimated assuming a 20-year 

equipment life and 7 percent interest rate.

C. Cost of Steam Stripper Upgrades

Steam stripper costs were developed for mills currently using steam stripping to comply 

with the kraft condensates limit. (EPA 2011a) Mills needing to improve stripper performance by

2 percent or less were expected to upgrade their existing steam strippers, and mills needing to 

improve stripper performance by more than 2 percent were expected to replace their existing 

steam strippers. Steam stripper costs (in 1991 dollars) for a 1,000 ton per day (tpd) mill were 

provided in the 1993 background information document for the proposed subpart S standards.

(EPA 1993) The 1991 capital cost of $3.5 million was scaled to 2010 dollars using the Chemical 

Engineering Plant Cost Index (CEPCI) (index = 361.3 for 1991 and 550.8 for 2010), resulting in 

a 2010 capital cost of $5,335,732 for a new steam stripper. The capital cost for stripper upgrades 

was assumed to be one half of the capital cost for a new steam stripper ($2,667,866). Annualized 

capital costs were estimated based on a 20-year equipment life and 7 percent interest rate (i.e., 

capital recovery factor of 0.094).

Mills currently operating stripper systems are already incurring annual costs associated 

with stripper operation. Upgraded or replacement strippers are likely to be more energy efficient 

than their predecessors, such that energy efficiency improvements offset any increased operating 

costs due to incremental equipment sizing. Therefore, for costing purposes, it was assumed that 

there would be no increase in the stripper operating cost (including labor or energy costs) 

associated with incremental improvements in the kraft condensate control efficiency. Appendix 

B1 presents the mill-by-mill costs for steam stripper upgrades based on these assumptions.

D. Impacts of Kraft Condensates Regulatory Options

This section discusses the environmental and energy impacts of the kraft condensates 

regulatory options. The environmental impacts include HAP and non-HAP emissions reductions, 

secondary emissions, and wastewater impacts.

1. Emissions reductions. Appendix B2 contains the methodology used to develop millspecific HAP and non-HAP emissions reductions for the condensate regulatory options. The 

predominant HAPs from kraft condensates are methanol and acetaldehyde. The non-HAPs 

evaluated are volatile organic compounds (VOC) and total reduced sulfur (TRS) compounds.
5

Strippers were used as the basis for the kraft condensates emissions reduction 

calculations because emission factors are readily available for strippers (unlike for biological 

treatment systems, where modeling of emission rates is required). Biological treatment systems 

are expected to achieve an equivalent emissions reduction.

Uncontrolled HAP emissions were estimated using an emission factor of 11 lb HAP/air 

dried ton of unbleached pulp (ADTUBP), an approximate total HAP value associated with 

stripper off-gas (SOG) from Technical Bulletin 973 (Table 4.14) prepared by the National 

Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI). (NCASI 2010) The amount of HAP in foul 

condensate stream was back-calculated as 11.96 lb HAP/ADTUBP using the current regulatory 

limit of 92 percent stripper HAP removal (leaving 0.96 lb HAP/ADTUBP in the stripped 

condensate stream). The reduction in HAP per mill was calculated assuming a 1,000 ADTUBP 

model facility operating 360 days per year and 98 percent removal of HAP in the SOGs via 

incineration. This total was multiplied by the 97 mills currently subject to the kraft condensates 

standards to arrive at the potential emissions reduction that would be required by tightening the 

regulatory limits for kraft condensates.

Based on information in NCASI Technical Bulletin 973, uncontrolled VOC emissions 

were estimated to be essentially equal to uncontrolled HAP (11 lb/ADTUBP), and are expected 

to strip at the same rate as HAP, since VOC is predominantly composed of HAP. Uncontrolled 

TRS emissions were estimated using an emission factor of 3.29 lb TRS/ADTUBP, based on the 

emission factor for SOG from NCASI Technical Bulletin 973 (Table 4.14). For purposes of this 

incremental analysis, we assumed the stripping rate for TRS to be similar to that for HAP or 

VOC. While the combustion of TRS in SOG combustion devices will likely generate some sulfur 

dioxide (SO2), the additional amount of SOGs burned under the incremental standards for kraft 

condensates would be small compared to the other fuels burned in the combustion device (e.g., 

boiler, lime kiln), so any incremental SO2 emissions generated would also be relatively small.

2. Energy impacts. Appendix B3 contains the methodology used to develop mill-specific

estimates of energy impacts. The energy impacts were estimated based solely on the electricity 

requirements associated with the biological treatment system upgrade needed to meet the kraft 

condensate incremental reductions. No additional electricity was expected to be required for 

steam stripper upgrades to meet the kraft condensate incremental reductions because the 

upgraded steam strippers are likely to be more energy efficient. (EPA 2001) Therefore, the only 

mills with energy impacts would be those conducting biological treatment system upgrades. We 

converted the electricity estimates (in kWh per year [yr]) to million British thermal units per year 

(MMBtu/yr) in order to estimate secondary emissions.

3. Secondary air emissions. Appendix B3 contains the methodology used to develop millspecific estimates of secondary air emissions. Secondary air emissions include the criteria 

pollutant emissions—particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), 

and SO2—that result from the generation of electricity to achieve the biological treatment system 

upgrades. The electricity was assumed to be purchased from offsite utilities, rather than 

generated onsite. We also developed secondary emissions estimates for greenhouse gases carbon 

dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) expected to be emitted from utilities.
6

We used a variety of information sources for the emission factors used to estimate the 

secondary emissions. For natural gas, we used emission factors (in pound per cubic foot [lb/ft3

] 

of natural gas) from the AP-42 chapter on natural gas combustion to estimate the secondary 

emissions for PM, CO, NOX, and SO2. (EPA 1998a) We used the AP-42 conversion factor of 

1,020 Btu/ft3 of natural gas to convert the emission factors to lb/MMBtu to facilitate estimating

the secondary emissions for these pollutants from natural gas. We used natural gas emission 

factors (in kilograms [kg]/MMBtu) from the General Stationary Fuel Combustion Sources 

subpart (40 CFR part 98, subpart C) of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule to estimate the 

secondary emissions for CO2, CH4, and N2O. Global warming potentials of 1 for CO2, 21 for 

CH4, and 310 for N2O (from Table A-1 to subpart A of part 98) were used to estimate CO2

equivalent emissions (CO2eq).

For solid fuel combustion, we used emission limits (in lb/MMBtu) from the new source 

performance standards (NSPS) for utility plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart Da) to estimate the 

secondary emissions for PM and SO2. We used emission factors (in lb/ton coal) from the AP-42 

chapter on coal combustion to estimate the secondary emissions for NOX and CO. (We 

specifically used the AP-42 emission factors for bituminuous/subbituminous coal 

combustion/spreader stokers. The NOX emission factor was based on an average of the AP-42 

emission factors for spreader stoker type boilers burning bituminous (11 lb/ton) and 

subbituminous (8.8 lb/ton) coal. We used the AP-42 conversion factor of 13,000 Btu/lb of coal to 

facilitate estimating the secondary emissions for NOX and CO from coal. We used emission 

factors (in kg/MMBtu) from 40 CFR part 98, subpart C to estimate the secondary emissions for 

CO2 (for units burning bituminous coal) and for CH4 and N2O (for units burning coal/coke). As 

before, we used the aforementioned global warming potentials for CO2, CH4, and N2O to 

estimate CO2eq.

To estimate the secondary emissions, we multiplied the emission factors for the 

aforementioned pollutants by the estimated energy impacts, assuming a specific mix of fuels 

would be used to generate the needed electricity for the biological treatment system upgrade. We 

used the projected fuel mix for 2015 (compliance deadline for subpart S RTR) from Version 3.0

of EPA’s Integrated Planning Model (IPM), which is a forecast model of the U.S. electric power 

sector. The projected fuel mix is 53 percent coal, 21 percent oil and natural gas, 17 percent 

nuclear, 6 percent hydroelectric, 2 percent renewable energy, and 1 percent other. We attributed 

no secondary air impacts to nuclear, hydroelectric, or renewable energy generation. The 

secondary air impacts for “other” were assumed to be equivalent to those for natural gas.

4. Wastewater impacts. Appendix B3 contains the methodology used to develop millspecific estimates of wastewater impacts. The wastewater impacts were estimated based solely 

on the biological treatment system upgrade needed to meet the kraft condensate incremental 

reductions. No additional wastewater was expected to be generated with the steam stripper 

upgrades because the upgraded steam strippers would be more efficient than current strippers. 

Therefore, the only mills with wastewater impacts would be those conducting biological 

treatment system upgrades. The additional wastewater generated under the biological treatment 

system upgrades was estimated by solving for “required upgrade (gal/d)” in the following 

equation (EPA 2011a):
7

Incremental reduction (e.g., 95%) = current system capacity (gal/d) + required upgrade (gal/d)

Current reduction (92%) current system capacity (gal/d)

We converted the daily wastewater estimates (gal/d) to annual wastewater estimates

(MM gal/yr), assuming an annual operating period of 360 days per year (d/yr) for each mill.

III.Cost Estimates for Repeat Air Emissions Testing

The EPA is considering repeat HAP emissions performance testing once every 5 years 

for facilities complying with the standards for kraft, soda, and semichemical pulping vent gases; 

sulfite processes; and bleaching systems. Under this testing option, repeat air emissions testing 

would be required for mills complying with the kraft condensate standards using a steam stripper 

(or other equipment serving the same function) since such equipment is, by definition, part of the 

low-volume, high-concentration (LVHC) gas collection system.

The EPA is not considering additional repeat testing for biological treatment systems to 

comply with the kraft pulping condensate standards, because more frequent quarterly sampling is 

already required for biological treatment systems. The EPA is also not considering additional

repeat testing for facilities complying with the clean condensate alternative (CCA) standards due 

to the complexity of this compliance approach.

The repeat emissions tests for chemical pulp mills (e.g., kraft, soda, and semichemical 

pulping vent gases, and sulfite processes) would involve testing for methanol using EPA Method 

308, 320, or 18. Facilities that perform bleaching using chlorinated compounds would be 

required to conduct repeat chlorine tests using EPA Method 26A. The subpart S supporting 

statement (which is revised every 3 years by EPA) indicated emissions testing costs of $14,000 

for Method 308 testing, and $10,000 for Methods 26A testing. These same testing costs were 

used in this analysis. For the purposes of this analysis, we assumed the costs for Method 308 

testing to be equivalent to the costs for Methods 320 and 18 testing.

Testing costs were treated as capital costs because mills will contract with a testing 

company to perform the testing. The capital costs were annualized at 7 percent interest over the 

5-year testing period, assuming that mills would obtain a 5-year loan to finance the testing.

Table 3 presents estimated emissions testing costs.

Table 3. Emissions Testing Costs by Mill Process

Mill type

Subpart S 

standard

Test 

method 

(surrogate 

pollutant)

Systems to be 

tested (typical 

number per mill)

No. 

tests 

per 

mill1

Cost 

per test

Capital 

cost per 

mill every 

5 years

Annualized 

capital cost 

per mill, 

$/yr

Kraft, soda, and 

semichemical 

mills

§63.443(a) Method 308 

(methanol)

LVHC (1), HVLC 

(1), and SOG (1)

3 $14,000 $42,000 $10,243

Kraft mills 

using 

biotreatment

§63.443(a) Method 308 

(methanol)

LVHC (1) and 

HVLC (1)

2 $14,000 $28,000 $6,829

Sulfite mills §63.444 Method 308 

(methanol)

Sulfite emissions 

release point (1)

1 $14,000 $14,000 $3,414
8

Mill type

Subpart S 

standard

Test 

method 

(surrogate 

pollutant)

Systems to be 

tested (typical 

number per mill)

No. 

tests 

per 

mill1

Cost 

per test

Capital 

cost per 

mill every 

5 years

Annualized 

capital cost 

per mill, 

$/yr

Mills bleaching 

with chlorinated 

compounds 

(e.g., ClO2)

§63.445 Method 26A 

(chlorine)

Bleaching system 

vents for chlorinated stages (2)

2 $10,000 $20,000 $4,878

1 Typical number of systems to be tested per mill is based on review of the Part I survey data. 

There are a number of variables that affect actual emissions testing cost per mill, 

including the numbers of equipment/systems to be tested and the subpart S compliance option 

used. In lieu of conducting a mill-by-mill and process-by-process analysis, we reviewed 

information submitted through Part I of the pulp and paper survey to determine typical numbers 

of equipment/systems that may require testing (notwithstanding use of subpart S compliance 

options that do not involve testing). The systems to be tested include LVHC and high-volume, 

low-concentration (HVLC) gas collection systems at kraft, soda, and semichemical mills subject 

to the emissions standards in §63.443(a) of subpart S. Stripper off-gases, though by definition 

part of the LVHC system, are often handled separately from LVHC and represent a separate 

emission point requiring compliance demonstration.

We estimated that the typical kraft, soda, or semichemical mill could be represented by 

one LVHC, one HVLC, and one stripper system that require testing. Kraft mills using 

biotreatment as their predominant kraft condensates control option would not have a SOG 

emission point. Sulfite mills typically route all process emissions through one emission point 

(e.g., a recovery system scrubber). Therefore, only one emissions point requiring testing was 

projected for sulfite mills. Major source mills performing bleaching using any chlorinated 

compounds are subject to the subpart S bleaching standards. The Part I survey data indicated that 

typically two bleaching emission points per mill would require testing.

Except for the unusual circumstance where a mill operates more than one LVHC, HVLC, 

and stripper system and uses compliance options that involve emissions testing, the testing costs 

presented in this memorandum are likely to be overestimated due to the following:

• The costing analysis does not account for mills that use compliance options that do not 

involve emissions testing (e.g., mills that introduce vent gas streams into the flame zone 

of a boiler, lime kiln, or recovery furnace or mills meeting the design criteria for a 

thermal oxidizer). Analysis of the Part I survey data indicates that roughly 85 percent of 

mills use compliance options that do not involve emissions testing for pulping vents. 

• Overall testing costs may be reduced at mills where testing for multiple systems is 

conducted through the same testing program (e.g., because fees for testing contractor 

travel and mobilization would be reduced).

IV. Summary of Nationwide Costs and Impacts

The nationwide costs and impacts associated with the subpart S regulatory options under 

consideration are summarized in Tables 4 and 5 below. Mill-specific estimates of the costs are 
9

presented in Appendix C1, and mill-specific estimates of the impacts are presented in Appendix 

C2. Only major sources of HAP emissions are affected (171 mills).

The number of mills impacted by the incremental efficiency increase in the kraft 

condensates standards ranges from 4 mills (93 percent reduction) to 66 mills (98 percent

reduction). Mills already meeting each incremental limit are not impacted (31 of 97 total kraft 

mills). The potential nationwide emissions reduction (based on emission factor calculations for 

97 mills subject to the revised standards) ranges from 2,046 to 12,275 tpy, with cost 

effectiveness values ranging from $485/ton to $2,700/ton. The nationwide energy impacts, 

secondary emissions, and wastewater impacts for these mills are small (see Table 5).

An estimated 114 mills are expected to be impacted by the repeat testing option, based on 

the number of chemical pulp mills and mills that bleach with chlorinated compounds. The 

nationwide capital and annual costs of repeat testing are estimated to be $5.4 million and $1.3

million, respectively. We could not quantify the specific emissions reduction associated with 

repeat emissions testing. However, it stands to reason that repeat testing would provide incentive 

for facilities to maintain their control systems and make periodic adjustments to ensure peak 

performance, thereby reducing emissions and the potential for periodic episodes of acute risk.

Table 6 presents a summary of the labor hours associated with initially implementing, 

and operating and maintaining the technologies and procedures that form the regulatory options.

Additional reporting and recordkeeping labor hours and costs were developed as part of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act supporting statement for 114 affected mills. The incremental reporting 

and recordkeeping costs resulting from the proposed amendments to subpart S are estimated to 

be $4,344 per mill ($0.50 million nationwide) as a one-time cost to revamp existing 

recordkeeping systems to be consistent with the proposed revisions to the startup and shutdown 

provisions, and $6,516/yr per mill ($0.74 million/yr nationwide) for two instances of affirmative 

defense. Details on these cost estimates, as well as an accounting for the labor hours involved, 

can be found in the supporting statement. (EPA 2011b)
10

Table 4. Summary of Nationwide Costs and Cost Effectiveness

Subpart S regulatory option

Costs

Cost effectiveness, 

$/ton No. of mills affected1 Capital cost, $million

Annualized cost, 

$million/yr

Kraft condensates

 92% → 93% $8.7 $0.99 $485 4

 92% → 94% $36 $4.1 $1,010 15

 92% → 95% $79 $9.0 $1,460 28

 92% → 96% $142 $16 $1,980 41

 92% → 97% $218 $25 $2,420 54

 92% → 98% $297 $34 $2,700 66

Repeat testing $5.4 $1.3 -- 114

Incremental reporting/recordkeeping $0.50 $0.74 -- 114

1 The number of affected major source mills out of a total of 171 major sources subject to subpart S.

Table 5. Summary of Nationwide Environmental and Energy Impacts

Subpart S 

regulatory option

Emissions 

reductions, tpy

Energy 

impacts, 

MMBtu/yr

Secondary emissions, tpy

Wastewater 

impacts, 

MM 

gal/yr

No. of 

mills 

affected1

HAP/ 

VOC1 TRS PM CO NOX SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O

Kraft condensates

 92% → 93% 2,046 612 1,024 0.008 0.06 0.1 0.3 69 0.007 0.001 157 4

 92% → 94% 4,092 1,224 4,809 0.04 0.3 0.5 1.5 324 0.03 0.005 741 15

 92% → 95% 6,138 1,836 11,339 0.09 0.7 1.3 3.6 765 0.08 0.01 1,755 28

 92% → 96% 8,183 2,448 22,003 0.2 1.3 2.5 7.0 1,484 0.1 0.02 3,418 41

 92% → 97% 10,229 3,059 35,478 0.3 2.1 4.0 11 2,392 0.2 0.03 5,533 54

 92% → 98% 12,275 3,671 51,670 0.4 3.1 5.8 16 3,484 0.3 0.05 8,085 66

1 Potential emissions reduction based on emission factor calculations for 97 mills subject to the kraft condensate standards (i.e., includes 

incremental emission reductions already achieved in practice for mills exceeding the current standard since these emission reductions would now 

be required through a change in the existing regulatory limit). VOC emissions reductions were assumed to be essentially equivalent to HAP 

emissions reductions.
11

Table 6. Labor Hour Summary

Subpart S regulatory option

Nationwide labor 

(initial hr)

Nationwide labor, 

hr/yr

Labor wage rate, 

$/hr Labor notes

Kraft condensates

 92% → 93% unknown 2,630 $25/hr = 38% of O&M cost / ($25/hr 

 92% → 94% 11,100 default in CapdetWorks)

 92% → 95% 24,000

 92% → 96% 43,100

 92% → 97% 64,100

 92% → 98% 87,640

Repeat testing unknown unknown unknown embedded in testing cost

Incremental reporting/recordkeeping 5,244 7,866 $97.78 technical,

$118.92 

managerial, 

$48.76 clerical

Labor rates are based on 

methodology customarily used in 

supporting statements. 85% of 

total presented is technical labor, 

5% is management labor, and 

10% percent is clerical labor.
12

V. References

EPA 1980 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical Report: Construction Costs for 

Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants: 1973-1978. Document No. EPA/430/9-

80-03. Washington, DC. 1980.

EPA 1993 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Industry –

Background Information for Proposed Air Emission Standards; Manufacturing 

Processes at Kraft, Sulfite, Soda, and Semi-Chemical Mills. Document No. EPA453/R-93-050a. Research Triangle Park, NC. October 1993.

EPA 1998a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission 

Factors. 5th Edition. Research Triangle Park, NC. Volume I: Stationary Point and 

Area Sources. Section 1.4: Natural Gas Combustion. July 1998.

EPA 1998b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission 

Factors, AP-42. 5th Edition. Research Triangle Park, NC. Volume I: Stationary 

Point and Area Sources. Section 1.1: Bituminous and Subbituminous Coal 

Combustion. September 1998.

EPA 2011a J. Bradfield and K. Spence, EPA. Memorandum to Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-

0544. Summary of Kraft Condensate Control Technology Review. October 23, 

2011.

EPA 2011b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Supporting Statement: NESHAP for Pulp 

and Paper Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart S) (Proposed Amendments).

November 2011.

Hydromantis Hydromantis, Inc. CapdetWorks v2.5. Released December 10, 2007.

2007

NCASI 2010 A. Someshwar, NCASI. Compilation of ‘Air Toxic’ and Total Hydrocarbon 

Emissions Data for Pulp and Paper Mill Sources – A Second Update. Technical 

Bulletin No. 973. February 2010.
Appendix A

Summary of CapdetWorks v2.5 Outputs Used in Development of Biological Treatment 

System Upgrade Correlations
Appendix A.  Complete‐Mix Activated Sludge: Bioreactor and Secondary Clarifier

Flow Rate,

MGD

Capital Costs,

$MM (2007)

Capital Costs,

$MM (2010) [ENR

CCI]

Total  (O&M)

Labor Costs,

$MM

Total Energy

Costs, $MM

[$0.1/kwh]

Material

Costs, $MM

Total O&M Costs,

$MM

0.5 3.57 3.9 0.123 0.0343 0.0178 0.1751

5 16.8 18.6 0.275 0.327 0.0762 0.6782

10 27.9 30.8 0.378 0.644 0.109 1.131

25 92.6 102.3 0.612 1.61 0.205 2.427

50 149 164.6 0.913 3.22 0.318 4.451

% of O&M

that is labor

% of O&M

that is

energy

70% 20%

41% 48%

33% 57%

25% 66%

21% 72%

Avg 38% 53%

Source: CapdetWorks v2.5

Design Basis mg/L

BOD 400

COD 908

y = 5.9749x0.8228

R2 = 0.9804

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

140.0

160.0

180.0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Capital Costs, $MM (2010) [ENR CCI]

3 5

Total Energy Costs, $MM [$0.1/kwh] Comparison of EPA 1980 and CapdetWorks Capital

y = 0.2546x0.6969

R2 = 0.9898

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Total O&M Costs, $MM

A‐1

Capdet Works

Capital Cost

Updated EPA 1980

Capital Cost

3 4

22 23

40 38

84 74

149 123

y = 0.0674x0.9856

R2 = 1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Total Energy Costs, $MM [$0.1/kwh]

0

50

100

150

200

12345

$MM

Comparison of EPA 1980 and CapdetWorks Capital

Cost

Capdet Works Capital Cost Updated EPA 1980 Capital Cost

A‐1
Appendix B

Calculations of Mill-Specific Costs and Impacts for Kraft Condensate Regulatory Options

Appendix B1. Kraft Condensate Standards Incremental Improvement Costs

Appendix B2. Kraft Condensate Standards Incremental Emissions Reductions

Appendix B3. Kraft Condensate Standards Energy and Environmental Impacts
Appendix B1. Kraft Condensate Standards Incremental Improvement Costs

Improvement NEI Predominant Treatment Method

Current performance level

(decimal percent)a

Currentsystem

capacity

(gal/day)

Upgraderequired(gal/day) b

Capital cost, $(2010)

Annualizedcost, $/yr

Nationwide HAP

reduction, tpy Cost effectiveness, $/ton

Biological sy

upgrade annenergy O&Mcost, $ 

93% NEI42357 Biotreatment 0.92 12,000,000 130435 1,118,089 $ $ 166,671 $ 9

NEI18335 Biotreatment 0.92 28,100,000 305435 2,251,757 $ $ 323,068 $ 20

NEI11251 Stripping 0.92 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI26309 Stripping 0.92 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

$ 8,705,578 $ 991,299 2,046 485 $ 29

94% NEI42357 Biotreatment 0.92 12,000,000 260870 1,977,716 $ $ 285,713 $ 17

NEI18335 Biotreatment 0.92 28,100,000 610870 3,982,989 $ $ 554,988 $ 41

NEI113340 Biotreatment 0.93 10,900,000 117204 1,023,900 $ $ 153,395 $ 8

NEI11338 Biotreatment 0.93 21,300,000 229032 1,776,862 $ $ 258,178 $ 15

NEI18373 Biotreatment 0.93 48,500,000 521505 3,496,964 $ $ 490,454 $ 35

NEI18652 Biotreatment 0.93 15,000,000 161290 1,331,529 $ $ 196,554 $ 11

NEI34070 Biotreatment 0.93 14,600,000 156989 1,302,244 $ $ 192,469 $ 10

NEI11251 Stripping 0.92 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI26309 Stripping 0.92 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI11172 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46739 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46835 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46931 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI6273 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI8196 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

$ 36,235,131 $ 4,137,987 4,092 1,011 $ 140

95% NEI42357 Biotreatment 0.92 12,000,000 391304 2,760,907 $ $ 391,923 $ 26

NEI18335 Biotreatment 0.92 28,100,000 916304 5,560,284 $ $ 762,221 $ 61

NEI113340 Biotreatment 0.93 10,900,000 234409 1,811,110 $ $ 262,883 $ 16

NEI11338 Biotreatment 0.93 21,300,000 458065 3,142,976 $ $ 443,200 $ 31

NEI18373 Biotreatment 0.93 48,500,000 1043011 6,185,555 $ $ 843,625 $ 70

NEI18652 Biotreatment 0.93 15,000,000 322581 2,355,257 $ $ 337,119 $ 22

NEI34070 Biotreatment 0.93 14,600,000 313978 2,303,456 $ $ 330,091 $ 21

NEI11251 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI26309 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI11172 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46739 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46835 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46931 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI6273 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI8196 Stripping 0.93 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI12492 Biotreatment 0.94 15900000 169149 1,384,684 $ $ 203,957 $ 11

NEI18657 Biotreatment 0.94 4130000 43936 456,714 $ $ 71,774 $ 3

NEI42254 Biotreatment 0.94 18900000 201064 1,596,297 $ $ 233,296 $ 13

NEI42410 Biotreatment 0.94 25360000 269787 2,033,176 $ $ 293,292 $ 18

NEI42689 Biotreatment 0.94 9035000 96117 869,719 $ $ 131,524 $ 6

NEI6450 Biotreatment 0.94 39000000 414894 2,897,137 $ $ 410,242 $ 28

NEI8186 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI26495 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI8619 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI7559 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI33883 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI33023 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI18390 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

$ 78,710,994 $ 8,978,397 6,138 1,463 $ 332

96% NEI42357 Biotreatment 0.92 12,000,000 521739 3,498,254 $ $ 490,626 $ 35

NEI18335 Biotreatment 0.92 28,100,000 1221739 7,045,252 $ $ 954,988 $ 82

NEI113340 Biotreatment 0.93 10,900,000 351613 2,528,324 $ $ 360,551 $ 24

NEI11338 Biotreatment 0.93 21,300,000 687097 4,387,620 $ $ 608,445 $ 46

NEI18373 Biotreatment 0.93 48,500,000 1564516 8,635,084 $ $ 1,159,492 $ 104NEI18652 Biotreatment 0.93 15,000,000 483871 3,287,957 $ $ 462,581 $ 32

NEI34070 Biotreatment 0.93 14,600,000 470968 3,215,643 $ $ 452,919 $ 32

NEI11251 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI26309 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI11172 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46739 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

B1‐1
Improvement NEI Predominant Treatment Method

Current performance level

(decimal percent)a

Currentsystem

capacity

(gal/day)

Upgraderequired(gal/day) b

Capital cost, $(2010)

Annualizedcost, $/yr

Nationwide HAP

reduction, tpy Cost effectiveness, $/ton

Biological sy

upgrade annenergy O&Mcost, $ 

NEI46835 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46931 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI6273 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI8196 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI12492 Biotreatment 0.94 15900000 338298 2,449,278 $ $ 349,859 $ 23

NEI18657 Biotreatment 0.94 4130000 87872 807,853 $ $ 122,693 $ 6

NEI42254 Biotreatment 0.94 18900000 402128 2,823,588 $ $ 400,357 $ 27

NEI42410 Biotreatment 0.94 25360000 539574 3,596,355 $ $ 503,682 $ 36

NEI42689 Biotreatment 0.94 9035000 192234 1,538,389 $ $ 225,287 $ 13

NEI6450 Biotreatment 0.94 39000000 829787 5,124,559 $ $ 705,265 $ 56

NEI8186 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI26495 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI8619 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI7559 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI33883 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI33023 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI18390 Stripping 0.94 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI18338 Biotreatment 0.95 23200000 244211 1,873,196 $ $ 271,402 $ 16

NEI26506 Biotreatment 0.95 9200000 96842 875,113 $ $ 132,292 $ 6NEI26526 Biotreatment 0.95 54900000 577895 3,805,220 $ $ 531,427 $ 39

NEI41628 Biotreatment 0.95 30970000 326000 2,375,779 $ $ 339,902 $ 22

NEI6261 Biotreatment 0.95 39200000 412632 2,884,134 $ $ 408,495 $ 28

NEI7181 Biotreatment 0.95 13900000 146316 1,228,944 $ $ 182,224 $ 10

NEI33025 Stripping 0.95 2,667,865 $ $ 250,779

NEI41252 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI42710 Stripping and biotreatment 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI46760 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI759 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI8265 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI9201 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

$ 142,016,521 $ 16,185,871 8,183 1,978 $ 644

97% NEI42357 Biotreatment 0.92 12,000,000 652174 4,203,285 $ $ 584,120 $ 44

NEI18335 Biotreatment 0.92 28,100,000 1527174 8,465,139 $ $ 1,137,711 $ 102NEI113340 Biotreatment 0.93 10,900,000 468817 3,203,556 $ $ 451,303 $ 31

NEI11338 Biotreatment 0.93 21,300,000 916129 5,559,408 $ $ 762,107 $ 61

NEI18373 Biotreatment 0.93 48,500,000 2086022 10,941,230 $ $ 1,453,478 $ 139NEI18652 Biotreatment 0.93 15,000,000 645161 4,166,062 $ $ 579,203 $ 43

NEI34070 Biotreatment 0.93 14,600,000 627957 4,074,435 $ $ 567,089 $ 42

NEI11251 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI26309 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI11172 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46739 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46835 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46931 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI6273 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI8196 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI12492 Biotreatment 0.94 15900000 507447 3,419,211 $ $ 480,094 $ 34

NEI18657 Biotreatment 0.94 4130000 131809 1,127,769 $ $ 168,032 $ 9

NEI42254 Biotreatment 0.94 18900000 603191 3,941,751 $ $ 549,526 $ 40

NEI42410 Biotreatment 0.94 25360000 809362 5,020,540 $ $ 691,637 $ 54

NEI42689 Biotreatment 0.94 9035000 288351 2,147,603 $ $ 308,898 $ 19

NEI6450 Biotreatment 0.94 39000000 1244681 7,153,925 $ $ 969,023 $ 83

NEI8186 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559NEI26495 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559NEI8619 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559NEI7559 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI33883 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI33023 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI18390 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI18338 Biotreatment 0.95 23200000 488421 3,313,375 $ $ 465,975 $ 33

NEI26506 Biotreatment 0.95 9200000 193684 1,547,932 $ $ 226,608 $ 13

NEI26526 Biotreatment 0.95 54900000 1155789 6,730,809 $ $ 914,326 $ 77

B1‐2
Improvement NEI Predominant Treatment Method

Current performance level

(decimal percent)a

Currentsystem

capacity

(gal/day)

Upgraderequired(gal/day) b

Capital cost, $(2010)

Annualizedcost, $/yr

Nationwide HAP

reduction, tpy Cost effectiveness, $/ton

Biological sy

upgrade annenergy O&Mcost, $ 

NEI41628 Biotreatment 0.95 30970000 652000 4,202,363 $ $ 583,999 $ 44

NEI6261 Biotreatment 0.95 39200000 825263 5,101,559 $ $ 702,252 $ 55

NEI7181 Biotreatment 0.95 13900000 292632 2,173,801 $ $ 312,465 $ 20

NEI33025 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI41252 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI42710 Stripping and biotreatment 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46760 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI759 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI8265 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI9201 Stripping 0.95 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI18334 Biotreatment 0.96 49000000 510417 3,435,668 $ $ 482,288 $ 34

NEI18658 Biotreatment 0.96 26350000 274479 2,062,226 $ $ 297,258 $ 18

NEI26514 Biotreatment 0.96 35000000 364583 2,604,816 $ $ 370,883 $ 24

NEI33103 Biotreatment 0.96 10100000 105208 936,857 $ $ 141,071 $ 7

NEI33118 Stripping and biotreatment 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI41314 Stripping and biotreatment 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779NEI18357 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI26476 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI34064 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI34066 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI40247 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI45182 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46599 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

$ 218,255,158 $ 24,735,200 10,229 2,418 $ 1,038

98% NEI42357 Biotreatment 0.92 12,000,000 782609 4,883,590 $ $ 673,677 $ 52

NEI18335 Biotreatment 0.92 28,100,000 1832609 9,835,228 $ $ 1,312,833 $ 122NEI113340 Biotreatment 0.93 10,900,000 586022 3,849,195 $ $ 537,260 $ 39

NEI11338 Biotreatment 0.93 21,300,000 1145161 6,679,841 $ $ 907,728 $ 77

NEI18373 Biotreatment 0.93 48,500,000 2607527 13,146,305 $ $ 1,732,263 $ 173NEI18652 Biotreatment 0.93 15,000,000 806452 5,005,682 $ $ 689,690 $ 54

NEI34070 Biotreatment 0.93 14,600,000 784946 4,895,589 $ $ 675,252 $ 53

NEI11251 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI26309 Stripping 0.92 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI11172 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46739 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46835 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI46931 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI6273 Stripping/Recycle 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI8196 Stripping 0.93 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI12492 Biotreatment 0.94 15900000 676596 4,332,370 $ $ 601,159 $ 45

NEI18657 Biotreatment 0.94 4130000 175745 1,428,959 $ $ 210,113 $ 12

NEI42254 Biotreatment 0.94 18900000 804255 4,994,463 $ $ 688,219 $ 54

NEI42410 Biotreatment 0.94 25360000 1079149 6,361,360 $ $ 866,448 $ 72

NEI42689 Biotreatment 0.94 9035000 384468 2,721,158 $ $ 386,571 $ 26

NEI6450 Biotreatment 0.94 39000000 1659574 9,064,502 $ $ 1,214,451 $ 111NEI8186 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI26495 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559NEI8619 Stripping and biotreatment 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559NEI7559 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI33883 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI33023 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI18390 Stripping 0.94 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI18338 Biotreatment 0.95 23200000 732632 4,625,498 $ $ 639,770 $ 49

NEI26506 Biotreatment 0.95 9200000 290526 2,160,925 $ $ 310,712 $ 19

NEI26526 Biotreatment 0.95 54900000 1733684 9,396,263 $ $ 1,256,840 $ 115

NEI41628 Biotreatment 0.95 30970000 978000 5,866,532 $ $ 802,137 $ 65

NEI6261 Biotreatment 0.95 39200000 1237895 7,121,817 $ $ 964,877 $ 83

NEI7181 Biotreatment 0.95 13900000 438947 3,034,643 $ $ 428,692 $ 29

NEI33025 Stripping 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI41252 Stripping 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI42710 Stripping and biotreatment 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559NEI46760 Stripping 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

B1‐3
Improvement NEI Predominant Treatment Method

Current performance level

(decimal percent)a

Currentsystem

capacity

(gal/day)

Upgraderequired(gal/day) b

Capital cost, $(2010)

Annualizedcost, $/yr

Nationwide HAP

reduction, tpy Cost effectiveness, $/ton

Biological sy

upgrade annenergy O&Mcost, $ 

NEI759 Stripping 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI8265 Stripping 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI9201 Stripping 0.95 5,335,732 $ $ 501,559

NEI18334 Biotreatment 0.96 49000000 1020833 6,077,132 $ $ 829,535 $ 68

NEI18658 Biotreatment 0.96 26350000 548958 3,647,738 $ $ 510,514 $ 37

NEI26514 Biotreatment 0.96 35000000 729167 4,607,491 $ $ 637,401 $ 49

NEI33103 Biotreatment 0.96 10100000 210417 1,657,147 $ $ 241,695 $ 14

NEI33118 Stripping and biotreatment 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI41314 Stripping and biotreatment 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI18357 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI26476 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI34064 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI34066 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI40247 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI45182 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI46599 Stripping 0.96 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI12411 Biotreatment 0.97 25240000 260206 1,973,577 $ $ 285,147 $ 17

NEI18660 Biotreatment 0.97 51000000 525773 3,520,494 $ $ 493,587 $ 35

NEI45474 Biotreatment 0.97 16700000 172165 1,404,967 $ $ 206,778 $ 11

NEI6057 Biotreatment 0.97 24520000 252784 1,927,136 $ $ 278,792 $ 17

NEI26491 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI40488 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI42695 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI45206 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI47074 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI47077 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI8278 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

NEI8560 Stripping 0.97 2,667,866 $ $ 250,779

$ 296,959,429 $ 33,679,688 12,275 2,744 $ 1,512

a. The methodology used to determine the current performance level based on the Part I resultsissummarized in a separate memo, "Summary of Kraft Condensate Control Technology Review."

b. WWT Upgrade Required: proportional; 92 > 93 = Current Size * 93/92, etc.

B1‐4
B2-1

Appendix B2. Kraft Condensate Standards Incremental Emissions Reductions

Parameters

HAP/ 

VOC TRS Notes and equations

Baseline

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.92 0.92

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.96 0.29 lb/ADTUBP - calculated based on 92% reduction

Reduction in 

condensate

11.00 3.29 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

1,980 592.2 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 1,940.4 580.356 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97

Nationwide reduction 188,219 56,295 Nationwide reduction (92% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

If change to 93% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.93 0.93

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see

above]

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.84 0.25 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in 

condensate

11.12 3.33 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

2,002 599 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 1,961 587 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97 No. of mills 

Nationwide reduction 190,265 56,906 Nationwide reduction (93% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

Incremental reduction 2,046 612 Incremental reduction, tpy, from increasing above 92% control

If change to 94% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.94 0.94

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see 

above]

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.72 0.21 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in 

condensate

11.24 3.36 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

2,023 605 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 1,983 593 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97 No. of mills

Nationwide reduction 192,311 57,518 Nationwide reduction (94% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

Incremental reduction 4,092 1,224 Incremental reduction, tpy, from increasing above 92% control
B2-2

Parameters

HAP/ 

VOC TRS Notes and equations

If change to 95% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.95 0.95

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see 

above]

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.60 0.18 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in 

condensate

11.36 3.40 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

2,045 612 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 2,004 599 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97 No. of mills

Nationwide reduction 194,356 58,130 Nationwide reduction (95% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

Incremental reduction 6,138 1,836 Incremental reduction, tpy, from increasing above 92% control

If change to 96% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.96 0.96

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see 

above]

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.48 0.14 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in 

condensate

11.48 3.43 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

2,066 618 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 2,025 606 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97 No. of mills

Nationwide reduction 198,402 58,742 Nationwide reduction (96% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

Incremental reduction 8,183 2,448 Incremental reduction, tpy, from increasing above 92% control

If change to 97% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.97 0.97

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see 

above]

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.36 0.11 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in 

condensate

11.60 3.47 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

2,088 624 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 2,046 612 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97 No. of mills

Nationwide reduction 198,448 59,354 Nationwide reduction (97% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

Incremental reduction 10,229 3,059 Incremental reduction, tpy, from increasing above 92% control
B2-3

Parameters

HAP/ 

VOC TRS Notes and equations

If change to 98% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.98 0.98

Pollutant in foul 

condensate

11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see 

above]

Pollutant in treated 

(stripped) condensate

0.24 0.07 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in 

condensate

11.72 3.50 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from 

condensate stream

2109 631 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill 

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 2067 618 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are 

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97 No. of mills

Nationwide reduction 200,494 59,966 Nationwide reduction (98% control) = 97 mills x reduction in 

incinerator

Incremental reduction 12,275 3,671 Incremental reduction, tpy, from increasing above 92% control
B3-1

Appendix B3. Kraft Condensate Standards Energy and Environmental Impacts

Parameters Value Notes, units, and equations

Energy impacts

Electricity requirements mill-specific kWh/yr = biological system upgrade annual energy O&M cost 

($/yr) / ($0.1/kWh)

Energy impacts mill-specific MMBtu/yr = (kWh/yr) x (3415.179 Btu/kWh) x (MMBtu/1E6

Btu)

Secondary emissions

Percent of generation

Coal 53% Used for solid fuel

Oil/natural gas 21% Used for natural gas

Nuclear 17% No secondary emissions estimated

Hydroelectric 6% No secondary emissions estimated

Renewable 2% No secondary emissions estimated

Other 1% Used for natural gas (assumed equivalent)

Particulate matter

Emission factor (natural gas) 1.9 lb/MM ft3 natural gas

0.00186275 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.03 lb/MMBtu solid, liquid, gaseous fuel

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for 

solid fuel and natural gas

Carbon monoxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 84 lb/MM ft3 natural gas

0.0824 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.19 lb/MMBtu bituminous coal

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for 

solid fuel and natural gas

Nitrogen oxides

Emission factor (natural gas) 100 lb/MM ft3 natural gas

0.0980 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.38 lb/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for 

solid fuel and natural gas

Sulfur dioxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 0.6 lb/MM ft3 natural gas

0.00059 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 1.2 lb/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for 

solid fuel and natural gas

Carbon dioxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 53.02 kg/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 93.4 kg/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (kg/MMBtu) x (2.204623 lb/kg) x (% of 

generation), for solid fuel and natural gas

Methane

Emission factor (natural gas) 0.001 kg/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.011 kg/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (kg/MMBtu) x (2.204623 lb/kg) x (% of 

generation), for solid fuel and natural gas

Nitrous oxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 0.0001 kg/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.0016 kg/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mill-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (kg/MMBtu) x (2.204623 lb/kg) x (% of 

generation), for solid fuel and natural gas
B3-2

Parameters Value Notes, units, and equations

Carbon dioxide equivalents

Global warming potential-CH4 21 Unitless

Global warming potential-N2O 310 Unitless

Secondary emissions mill-specific CO2eq, lb/yr = [CO2 (lb/yr)] + [21 x CH4 (lb/yr)] + [310 x N2O 

(lb/yr)]

Wastewater impacts

System upgrade mill-specific gal/d = (incremental reduction [e.g., 95%]) x (current system 

capacity [gal/d])/(current reduction [92%]) - current system 

capacity (gal/d)

Wastewater impacts mill-specific MM gal/yr = (gal/d) x (360 d/yr) x (MM gal/yr/1E6 gal)

Notes:

1. Assume electricity generated using the mix listed in the table (from IPM Version 3.0 for the year 2015). IPM is 

EPA’s Integrated Planning Model, which is a forecast model of the U.S. electric power sector.

2. For natural gas combustion, used AP-42 emission factors for PM, CO, NOX, and SO2. (EPA 1998a) Assumed 

1,020 Btu/ft3 of natural gas in estimating PM, CO, NOX, and SO2 secondary emissions. Used 40 CFR part 98, 

subpart C emission factors for CO2, CH4, and N2O.

3. For solid fuel combustion, used NSPS emission factors for PM and SO2 (40 CFR part 60, subpart Da, coal-fired 

utility plants), used AP-42 emission factors for NOx and CO (bituminuous/subbituminous coal combustion/spreader 

stoker). (EPA 1998b) The NOx emission factor was based on average of NOx emission factors for spreader stoker 

type boilers burning bituminous (11 lb/ton) and subbituminous (8.8 lb/ton) coal. Assumed 13,000 Btu/lb of coal in 

estimating NOX and CO secondary emissions. Used 40 CFR part 98, subpart C emission factors for CO2 (bituminous 

coal) and CH4 and N2O (coal/coke).
Appendix C

Mill-Specific Cost and Impacts Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for 

Subpart S RTR Proposal

Appendix C1. Mill-Specific Cost Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for 

Subpart S RTR Proposal

Appendix C2. Mill-Specific Impacts Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for 

Subpart S RTR Proposal
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Cost Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for the Subpart S RTR Proposal

231 NEI11108 AbiBow US Inc. Grenada MS No TMP Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

613 NEI11172 Georgia Pacific Monticello LLC Monticello MS No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK No kraft, semi‐chemical Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

140 NEI13340 Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC Halsey OR No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

152 NEI11338 Wickliffe Paper Company Wickliffe KY No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

512 NEI11367 Ahlstrom Filtration LLC Madisonville KY No none Yes no bleaching No

128 NEI11461 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Coshocton OH No semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Yes

373 NEI11600 Smart Papers Holdings, LLC Hamilton OH No none Yes no bleaching No

288 NEI11602 Graphic Packaging International Inc. Middletown OH No none Yes no bleaching No301 NEI11610 Rock‐Tenn Converting Company Cincinnati OH No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No

451 NEI11645 Appleton Papers Inc. West Carrollton OH No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

136 NEI12368 Sappi Cloquet LLC Cloquet MN No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle Yes

229 NEI12407 Verso Sartell LLC Sartell MN No TMP Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

202 NEI12411 Boise White Paper, LLC International Falls MN No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

121 NEI12492 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

428 NEI12980 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products LP Muskogee OK No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

515 NEIMA131179 Hollingsworth & Vose Company East Walpole MA No none Yes no bleaching No

210 NEI13216 Catalyst Paper (Snowflake) Inc. Snowflake AZ No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No133 NEI13363 Simpson Tacoma Kraft Company, LLC Tacoma WA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

230 NEI6284 Verso Bucksport, LLC Bucksport ME No TMP, stone

groundwood

Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

186 NEI18334 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products LP

(Naheola Mill)

Pennington AL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL No kraft, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

130 NEI18338 Georgia‐Pacific Brewton LLC Brewton AL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

f h l bl h

Pulping process Paper production

Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Impacted‐repeat

RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State Small business testing

245 NEI18347 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Stevenson AL No semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

No no bleaching Yes

600 NEI18357 International Paper Company Courtland AL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

208228535 NEI18373 Alabama River Cellulose, LLC Perdue Hill AL No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

199 NEI18390 AbiBow US Inc. ‐ Coosa Pines

Operations

Coosa Pines AL No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

138 NEI18652 Clearwater Paper Corporation Arkansas City AR No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

197 NEI18657 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR No kraft Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

171 NEI18658 Evergreen Packaging Inc Pine Bluff AR No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

196 NEI18660 Domtar A.W. LLC Ashdown AR No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

409 NEI208 White Birch Paper Company Bear

Island LLC Division

Ashland VA No TMP, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

339 NEI23 Ox Paperboard LLC Halltown WV No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No

289 NEI26304 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Jacksonville FL No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

241 NEI26382 Rayonier Fernandina Mill Fernandina Beach FL No sulfite‐NH3 No bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

180 NEI26471 Graphic Packaging International, Inc. Macon GA No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

115 NEI26476 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Port Wentworth GA No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

391 NEI26487 The Procter & Gamble Paper Products

Company

Albany GA No none Yes no bleaching No

190 NEI26491 Georgia‐Pacific Cedar Springs, LLC Cedar Springs GA No kraft, semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

120 NEI26495 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment Yes

143 NEI26504 Packaging Corporation of America Clyattville GA No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

114 NEI26506 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Oglethorpe GA No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

175 NEI26514 International Paper Company AUGUSTA GA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

240 NEI26526 Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC JESUP GA No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

137 NEI26581 Clearwater Paper Corp ‐ PPD & CPD,

Idaho1

Lewiston ID No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

315 NEI2INT16350 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Cayuga IN No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No

Page C1‐1
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Cost Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for the Subpart S RTR Proposal

Pulping process Paper production

Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Impacted‐repeat

RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State Small business testing

435 NEI2TN0099 ,

NEITN1050093

Kimberly‐Clark Corporation Loudon TN No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

370 NEI2WAT18798 Ponderay Newsprint Co. Usk WA No TMP Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No109 NEI32869A Domtar Paper Company, LLC. Hawesville KY No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Thermal Incinerator Yes

169 NEI33013 International Paper Mansfield LA No kraft, semi‐chemical Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound Recycle Yes

226 NEI33023 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Hodge LA No kraft, semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

108 NEI33025 International Paper Campti LA No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

387 NEI33072 S. D. Warren Co. Westbrook mill Westbrook ME No none Yes no bleaching No

183 NEI33103 Red Shield Acquisition, LLC Old Town ME Yes kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

157 NEI33104 Lincoln Paper and Tissue, LLC Lincoln ME Yes kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

135 NEI33118 S.D. Warren Company ‐ Somerset

Operations

Skowhegan ME No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping and biotreatment Yes

145 NEI33135, NEI706 Luke Paper Company Luke MD No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

403 NEI33866 Neenah Paper, Inc. Munising MI No none Yes no bleaching No

155 NEI33883 Escanaba Paper Company Escanaba MI No kraft, RMP Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

177 NEI33887 Verso Quinnesec LLC Quinnesec MI No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recylce Yes

247 NEI33945 Packaging Corporation of America Filer City MI No semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Yes

423 NEI33950 Menominee Acquisition Corporation

dba Clearwater Paper

Menominee MI No none Yes no bleaching No

468 NEI33981 EB Eddy Paper Inc. Port Huron MI No none Yes no bleaching No

429 NEI33986 Manistique Papers, Inc. Manistique MI No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

213 NEI34020 Wausau Paper Corp. Brainerd MN No none Yes no bleaching No

118 NEI34030 UPM Blandin Paper Company Grand Rapids MN No stone groundwood Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

112 NEI34064 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Columbus MS No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

242 NEI34066 Leaf River Cellulose, LLC New Augusta MS No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

167 NEI34070 International Paper Co. ‐ Vicksburg

Mill

Redwood MS No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

173 NEI35908 International Paper Company Ticonderoga NY No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Recycle Yes

433 NEI36019 Knowlton Technologies, LLC Watertown NY Yes none Yes no bleaching No

193 NEI39968 Finch Paper LLC Glens Falls NY No sulfite‐NH3 Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

174 NEI40247 International Paper, Inc Riegelwood NC No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

206 NEI40282 Blue Ridge Holding Company Canton NC No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

149 NEI40488 P.H. Glatfelter Company ‐ Chillicothe

Facility2

Chillicothe OH No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

204 NEI40553 Boise White Paper LLC St Helens OR No none Yes no bleaching No

615 NEI40554 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products,

LP

Clatskanie OR No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

188 NEI40600 Georgia‐Pacific Toledo LLC Toledo OR No kraft, semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

410 NEI40648 SP Newsprint Co. Newberg OR No TMP, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No100 NEI40686 Domtar Paper Company LLC Johnsonburg PA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping and biotreatment Yes

290 NEI40720 PaperWorks Industires, Inc Philadelphia PA No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No389 NEI40738 The Procter & Gamble Paper Products

Company

Mehoopany PA No none Yes no bleaching No

151 NEI41252 KapStone North Charleston SC No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

166 NEI41314 International Paper Georgetown SC No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping and biotreatment Yes

142 NEI41552 Packaging Corporation of America Counce TN No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes198 NEI41565 AbiBow US Inc Calhoun TN No kraft, TMP, secondary

fiber

Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

106 NEI41599 Domtar Paper Company, LLC Kingsport TN No soda Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

165 NEI41628 International Paper Company Queen City TX No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

187 NEI42211 GP Big Island, LLC Big Island VA No semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Yes

131 NEI42254 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation West Point VA No kraft, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

126 NEI42317 Smurfit Stone Container Corporation Hopewell VA No kraft Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes414 NEI42329 Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd. Port Angeles WA No RMP, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

Page C1‐2
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Cost Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for the Subpart S RTR Proposal

Pulping process Paper production

Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Impacted‐repeat

RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State Small business testing

156 NEI42338 Longview Fibre Paper & Packaging,

Inc.

Longview WA No kraft, semi‐chemical Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

102 NEI42341A Weyerhaeuser NR Company Longview WA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recylcle Yes

371 NEI42341B North Pacific Paper Corporation Longview WA No TMP, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Yes kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes158 NEI42385 Kimberly‐Clark Worldwide Everett WA No sulfite‐NH3 Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

203 NEI42410 Boise White Paper LLC Wallula WA No kraft, sulfite‐Na Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

436 NEI42482 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products LP Green Bay WI No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

341 NEI42486 GREEN BAY PACKAGING INC. MILL &

SHIPPING CONTAINER DIV

GREEN BAY WI No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No

500 NEI42495 Thilmany LLC De Pere WI No none Yes no bleaching No

117 NEI42689 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC. Mosinee WI No kraft Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

215 NEI42690 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC. Brokaw WI No none Yes no bleaching No

617 NEI42695 Domtar A.W. LLC Nekoosa WI No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

164 NEI42710 Thilmany,LLC Kaukauna WI No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment Yes

192 NEI42730 Flambeau River Papers LLC Park Falls WI No sulfite‐Ca Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound Yes

375 NEI42800 Shawano Specialty Papers ‐ A Division

of Little Rapids Corporation

Shawano WI Yes none Yes no bleaching No

223 NEI42961 NewPage Wisconsin System, Inc Wisconsin Rapids WI No TMP, stone

groundwood

Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

NewPage, Wisconsin Systems Inc. Wisconsin Rapids WI No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle Yes

216 NEI43202 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC Rhinelander WI No none Yes no bleaching No

526 NEI43207 APPLETON COATED L.L.C. LOCKS MILL Combined Locks WI No none Yes no bleaching No

244 NEI43472 Sonoco Products Company Hartsville SC No semi‐chemical Yes no bleaching Yes105 NEI45182 International Paper Company Springfield OR No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

111 NEI45206 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Vanceboro NC No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

179 NEI45474 Rock‐Tenn Mill Company, LLC Demopolis AL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes185 NEI46599 Georgia Pacific Consumer Products

(Camas), LLC

CAMAS WA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

141 NEI46750 PACKAGING CORPORATION OF

AMERICA‐Tomahawk

Tomahawk WI No semi‐chemical Yes no bleaching Yes

162 NEI46760 International Paper Eastover SC No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

119 NEI46814 TIN Inc. dba Temple Inland BOGALUSA LA No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Recycle Yes

184 NEI46817 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Operations

LLC Port Hudson Operations

Zachary LA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Recycle Yes

195 NEI46835 Woodland Pulp LLC5 Baileyville ME No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

340 NEI46852 Green Bay Packaging Inc. Morrilton AR No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Recycle Yes

122 NEI46866 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Waverly TN No semi‐chemical Yes no bleaching Yes

148 NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Corporation Cottonton AL No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

107 NEI47074 Domtar Paper Company LLC Bennettsville SC No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

200 NEI47077 AbiBow US Inc. Catawba SC No kraft, TMP Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

606 NEI47091 Buckeye Florida, Limited Partnership Perry FL No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

176 NEI47104 KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation Roanoke Rapids NC No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment Yes

189 NEI54342 Georgia‐Pacific LLC Crossett Paper

Operations

Crossett AR No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping and biotreatment Yes

365 NEI54400 Domtar Paper Company, LLC Rothschild WI No sulfite‐Ca Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound Yes181 NEI6057 Graphic Packaging International Inc. West Monroe LA No kraft, semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

514 NEI6175 Hollingsworth & Vose Company West Groton MA No none Yes no bleaching No

610 NEI6261 Verso Androscoggin LLC Jay ME No kraft, stone

groundwood

Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

150 NEI6273 Rumford Paper Company RUMFORD ME No kraft, stone

groundwood

Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle Yes

147 NEI6450 WESTVACO TEXAS LP EVADALE TX No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

Page C1‐3
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Cost Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for the Subpart S RTR Proposal

Pulping process Paper production

Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Impacted‐repeat

RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State Small business testing

207 NEI7104 Appleton Papers, Inc. Roaring Spring PA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

501 NEI7106 Team Ten, LLC Tyrone PA Yes secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No182 NEI7181 PH Glatfelter Spring Grove PA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

201 NEI7559 Boise Packaging and Newsprint, LLC DeRidder LA No kraft, TMP, secondary

fiber

Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

146 NEI759 MeadWestvaco of Virginia, Inc Covington VA No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

127 NEI7933 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Florence SC No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes232 NEI8122 Augusta Newsprint Company LLC Augusta GA No TMP, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No159 NEI8177 Interstate Paper, LLC Riceboro GA No kraft Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

430 NEI8178 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products LP Rincon GA No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Yes

531 NEI8186 International Paper Company Savannah GA No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment Yes

243 NEI8196 GP Cellulose, LLC. Brunswick GA No kraft No bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

132 NEI8261 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Fernandina Beach FL No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Biotreatment Yes

525 NEI8265 Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations

LLC1

Palatka FL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

124 NEI8278 Smurfit Stone Container Corp Panama City FL No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

163 NEI8560 International Paper Company Prattville AL No kraft, secondary fiber Yes no bleaching Stripping Yes

205 NEI8601 BOISE WHITE PAPER LLC Jackson AL No kraft, secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment Yes

116 NEI8619 International Paper Company Pine Hill AL No kraft, semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment Yes

103 NEI9201 Domtar Paper Company Plymouth NC No kraft Yes bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping Yes

275 NEICT3102 Cascades Boxboard Group

Connecticut LLC, Versailles Mills

Versailles CT No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No

369 NEIGAT$3911 SP Newsprint Dublin GA No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

511 NEIIL0215971 Ahlstrom Filtration, LLC Taylorville IL No none Yes no bleaching No425 NEIMA10626 Onyx Specialty Papers, Inc. South Lee MA Yes none Yes no bleaching No

363 NEIME0250002 Madison Paper Industries Madison ME No stone groundwood Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

368611 NEIMN14904 NewPage Wisconsin System Inc. Duluth MN No pressurized

groundwood,secondary fiber

Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

508513 NEINY5532600 Hollingsworth and Vose Co. Greenwich NY No none Yes no bleaching No

496 NEINY5533400 Hollingsworth and Vose Company Greenwich NY No none Yes no bleaching No

322 NEIPA1013489 Newman & Company, Inc. Philadelphia PA Yes secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No304 NEIVA00022 Greif Packaging LLC Riverville VA No semi‐chemical,

secondary fiber

Yes no bleaching Yes

518 NEIWA0270002 Grays Harbor Paper, LLC Hoquiam WA No none Yes no bleaching No

254 NEIWI0793640 Wisconsin Paperboard Corporation Milwaukee WI No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No520 NEIWI4050324 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products LP Green Bay WI No none Yes no bleaching No

Page C1‐4
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Cost Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for the Subpart S RTR Proposal

Pulping process Paper production

Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Impacted‐repeat

RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State Small business testing

382 NEIWI4710355 SCA Tissue North America LLC ‐ 

Menasha Papermill

Menasha WI No secondary fiber Yes bleaching w/o Cl compound No

224 NEIWI7500086,

NEIWIT$8597

NewPage Wisconsin System, Inc. Stevens Point WI No none Yes no bleaching No

516 NEIGAT$3909 Hollingsworth & Vose Company Hawkinsville GA No none Yes no bleaching No

311 NEW73505 Republic Paperboard Company, LLC2 Lawton OK No secondary fiber Yes no bleaching No

TOTAL Specified for 97 kraft mills 114

1. Note that 2 mills (RTI code 137 & 195) had incorrectly labeled in their Part I ICR response that no chlorinated compounds were used in any stage of bleaching. Upon further review of the information submitted with Part I, it was determined that ch

2. Determined HAP additive emissions for these mills by extrapolating from known emissions estimates.

Page C1‐5
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

231 NEI11108613 NEI11172104 NEI11251140 NEI13340152 NEI11338512 NEI11367128 NEI11461373 NEI11600288 NEI11602301 NEI11610451 NEI11645136 NEI12368229 NEI12407202 NEI12411121 NEI12492428 NEI12980515 NEIMA131179210 NEI13216133 NEI13363230 NEI6284186 NEI18334172 NEI18335130 NEI18338

RTI ID NEI ID Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Operating cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital c

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,33

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,33

$ 1,023,900 $ 57,149 $ 96,247 $ 153,395 $ 1,811,110 $ 92,639 $ 170,244 $ 262,883 $ 2,52

$ 1,776,862 $ 91,153 $ 167,025 $ 258,178 $ 3,142,976 $ 147,760 $ 295,440 $ 443,200 $ 4,38

$ 1,384,684 $ 73,797 $ 130,160 $ 203,957 $ 2,44

$ 2,251,757 $ 111,403 $ 211,665 $ 323,068 $ 3,982,989 $ 180,587 $ 374,401 $ 554,988 $ 5,560,284 $ 239,554 $ 522,667 $ 762,221 $ 7,04

$ 1,87

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 93% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 94% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 95% 

245 NEI18347600 NEI18357

208228535 NEI18373

199 NEI18390138 NEI18652197 NEI18657171 NEI18658196 NEI18660409 NEI208339 NEI23289 NEI26304178 NEI26309241 NEI26382180 NEI26471115 NEI26476391 NEI26487190 NEI26491120 NEI26495143 NEI26504114 NEI26506175 NEI26514240 NEI26526137 NEI26581315 NEI2INT16350

$ 3,496,964 $ 161,739 $ 328,715 $ 490,454 $ 6,185,555 $ 262,183 $ 581,442 $ 843,625 $ 8,63

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 1,331,529 $ 71,391 $ 125,164 $ 196,554 $ 2,355,257 $ 115,725 $ 221,394 $ 337,119 $ 3,28

$ 456,714 $ 28,843 $ 42,931 $ 71,774 $ 80

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,33

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 87

$ 3,80

Page C1‐6
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

435 NEI2TN0099 ,

NEITN1050093

370 NEI2WAT18798109 NEI32869A169 NEI33013226 NEI33023108 NEI33025387 NEI33072183 NEI33103157 NEI33104135 NEI33118145 NEI33135, NEI706

403 NEI33866155 NEI33883177 NEI33887247 NEI33945423 NEI33950468 NEI33981429 NEI33986213 NEI34020118 NEI34030112 NEI34064242 NEI34066167 NEI34070173 NEI35908433 NEI36019

Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Operating cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital c

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 93% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 94% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 95% 

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 2,66

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 1,302,244 $ 70,058 $ 122,411 $ 192,469 $ 2,303,456 $ 113,566 $ 216,525 $ 330,091 $ 3,21

193 NEI39968174 NEI40247206 NEI40282149 NEI40488204 NEI40553615 NEI40554188 NEI40600410 NEI40648100 NEI40686290 NEI40720389 NEI40738151 NEI41252166 NEI41314142 NEI41552198 NEI41565106 NEI41599165 NEI41628187 NEI42211131 NEI42254126 NEI42317414 NEI42329

$ 2,66$ 2,37

$ 1,596,297 $ 83,244 $ 150,052 $ 233,296 $ 2,82

Page C1‐7
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

156 NEI42338102 NEI42341A371 NEI42341B139 NEI42357158 NEI42385203 NEI42410436 NEI42482341 NEI42486500 NEI42495117 NEI42689215 NEI42690617 NEI42695164 NEI42710192 NEI42730375 NEI42800223 NEI42961154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

216 NEI43202526 NEI43207244 NEI43472105 NEI45182111 NEI45206

Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Operating cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital c

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 93% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 94% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 95% 

$ 1,118,089 $ 61,571 $ 105,100 $ 166,671 $ 1,977,716 $ 99,808 $ 185,905 $ 285,713 $ 2,760,907 $ 132,398 $ 259,525 $ 391,923 $ 3,49

$ 2,033,176 $ 102,173 $ 191,119 $ 293,292 $ 3,59

$ 869,719 $ 49,770 $ 81,754 $ 131,524 $ 1,53

$ 2,66

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,33

179 NEI45474185 NEI46599141 NEI46750162 NEI46760119 NEI46814184 NEI46817195 NEI46835340 NEI46852122 NEI46866148 NEI46931107 NEI47074200 NEI47077606 NEI47091176 NEI47104189 NEI54342365 NEI54400181 NEI6057514 NEI6175610 NEI6261150 NEI6273147 NEI6450

$ 2,66

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,33

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,33

$ 2,88

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,33

$ 2,897,137 $ 137,911 $ 272,331 $ 410,242 $ 5,12

Page C1‐8
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

207 NEI7104501 NEI7106182 NEI7181201 NEI7559146 NEI759127 NEI7933232 NEI8122159 NEI8177430 NEI8178531 NEI8186243 NEI8196132 NEI8261525 NEI8265124 NEI8278163 NEI8560205 NEI8601116 NEI8619103 NEI9201275 NEICT3102369 NEIGAT$3911511 NEIIL0215971425 NEIMA10626

Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Operating cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital c

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 93% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 94% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 95% 

$ 1,22

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 2,66

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,33

$ 2,66

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,66

$ 2,66

363 NEIME0250002

368611 NEIMN14904508513 NEINY5532600

496 NEINY5533400322 NEIPA1013489304 NEIVA00022518 NEIWA0270002254 NEIWI0793640520 NEIWI4050324

Page C1‐9
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

382 NEIWI4710355224 NEIWI7500086,

NEIWIT$8597

516 NEIGAT$3909311 NEW73505

TOTAL

1. Note that 2 mills (RTI code 13

2. Determined HAP additive em

Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating cost,

$

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Operating cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital c

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 93% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 94% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 95% 

$8,705,578 $172,974 $818,324 $991,299 $36,235,131 $731,884 $3,406,102 $4,137,987 $78,710,994 $1,579,564 $7,398,833 $8,978,397 $142,01

lorinated compunds were present in the bleaching stage.

Page C1‐10
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

231 NEI11108613 NEI11172104 NEI11251140 NEI13340152 NEI11338512 NEI11367128 NEI11461373 NEI11600288 NEI11602301 NEI11610451 NEI11645136 NEI12368229 NEI12407202 NEI12411121 NEI12492428 NEI12980515 NEIMA131179210 NEI13216133 NEI13363230 NEI6284186 NEI18334172 NEI18335130 NEI18338

RTI ID NEI ID Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Annual cost, $

$0 $0

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$42,000 $10,243

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$42,000 $10,243

$ 3,203,556 $ 150,169 $ 301,134 $ 451,303 $ 3,849,195 $ 175,435 $ 361,824 $ 537,260 $48,000 $11,707

$ 5,559,408 $ 239,522 $ 522,584 $ 762,107 $ 6,679,841 $ 279,822 $ 627,905 $ 907,728 $48,000 $11,707

$0 $0

$42,000 $10,243

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$20,000 $4,878$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0

$ 1,973,577 $ 99,631 $ 185,516 $ 285,147

$48,000 $11,707

$ 3,419,211 $ 158,688 $ 321,406 $ 480,094 $ 4,332,370 $ 193,917 $ 407,243 $ 601,159

$28,000 $6,829

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

$48,000 $11,707

$0 $0

$ 3,435,668 $ 159,335 $ 322,953 $ 482,288 $ 6,077,132 $ 258,285 $ 571,250 $ 829,535

$48,000 $11,707

$ 8,465,139 $ 341,988 $ 795,723 $ 1,137,711 $ 9,835,228 $ 388,322 $ 924,511 $ 1,312,833

$48,000 $11,707

$ 3,313,375 $ 154,518 $ 311,457 $ 465,975 $ 4,625,498 $ 204,973 $ 434,797 $ 639,770 $48,000 $11,707

$ $

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 97% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 98% Repeat testing

245 NEI18347600 NEI18357

208228535 NEI18373

199 NEI18390138 NEI18652197 NEI18657171 NEI18658196 NEI18660409 NEI208339 NEI23289 NEI26304178 NEI26309241 NEI26382180 NEI26471115 NEI26476391 NEI26487190 NEI26491120 NEI26495143 NEI26504114 NEI26506175 NEI26514240 NEI26526137 NEI26581315 NEI2INT16350

$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$ 10,941,230 $ 425,003 $ 1,028,476 $ 1,453,478 $ 13,146,305 $ 496,510 $ 1,235,753 $ 1,732,263 $48,000 $11,707

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$62,000 $15,121

$ 4,166,062 $ 187,593 $ 391,610 $ 579,203 $ 5,005,682 $ 219,156 $ 470,534 $ 689,690 $48,000 $11,707

$ 1,127,769 $ 62,022 $ 106,010 $ 168,032 $ 1,428,959 $ 75,791 $ 134,322 $ 210,113 $28,000 $6,829

$ 2,062,226 $ 103,408 $ 193,849 $ 297,258 $ 3,647,738 $ 167,627 $ 342,887 $ 510,514 $48,000 $11,707

$ 3,520,494 $ 162,661 $ 330,926 $ 493,587 $48,000 $11,707

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$34,000 $8,292$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$0 $0

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779

$42,000 $10,243

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $42,000 $10,243

$42,000 $10,243

$ 1,547,932 $ 81,103 $ 145,506 $ 226,608 $ 2,160,925 $ 107,585 $ 203,127 $ 310,712 $48,000 $11,707

$ 2,604,816 $ 126,030 $ 244,853 $ 370,883 $ 4,607,491 $ 204,297 $ 433,104 $ 637,401 $48,000 $11,707

$ 6,730,809 $ 281,630 $ 632,696 $ 914,326 $ 9,396,263 $ 373,591 $ 883,249 $ 1,256,840 $48,000 $11,707

$48,000 $11,707

$0 $0

Page C1‐11
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

435 NEI2TN0099 ,

NEITN1050093

370 NEI2WAT18798109 NEI32869A169 NEI33013226 NEI33023108 NEI33025387 NEI33072183 NEI33103157 NEI33104135 NEI33118145 NEI33135, NEI706

403 NEI33866155 NEI33883177 NEI33887247 NEI33945423 NEI33950468 NEI33981429 NEI33986213 NEI34020118 NEI34030112 NEI34064242 NEI34066167 NEI34070173 NEI35908433 NEI36019

Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Annual cost, $

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 97% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 98% Repeat testing

$20,000 $4,878

$0 $0

$62,000 $15,121$42,000 $10,243

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $42,000 $10,243

$0 $0

$ 936,857 $ 53,006 $ 88,065 $ 141,071 $ 1,657,147 $ 85,924 $ 155,772 $ 241,695 $48,000 $11,707

$48,000 $11,707

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779

$62,000 $15,121$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$62,000 $15,121$42,000 $10,243

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$ 4,074,435 $ 184,092 $ 382,997 $ 567,089 $ 4,895,589 $ 215,066 $ 460,185 $ 675,252

$28,000 $6,829$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0

193 NEI39968174 NEI40247206 NEI40282149 NEI40488204 NEI40553615 NEI40554188 NEI40600410 NEI40648100 NEI40686290 NEI40720389 NEI40738151 NEI41252166 NEI41314142 NEI41552198 NEI41565106 NEI41599165 NEI41628187 NEI42211131 NEI42254126 NEI42317414 NEI42329

$34,000 $8,292

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$62,000 $15,121

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779

$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0

$48,000 $11,707$28,000 $6,829

$0 $0

$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0$0 $0

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$28,000 $6,829$62,000 $15,121$62,000 $15,121

$ 4,202,363 $ 188,976 $ 395,022 $ 583,999 $ 5,866,532 $ 250,683 $ 551,454 $ 802,137 $48,000 $11,707

$42,000 $10,243

$ 3,941,751 $ 179,002 $ 370,525 $ 549,526 $ 4,994,463 $ 218,740 $ 469,479 $ 688,219

$48,000 $11,707$28,000 $6,829

$0 $0

Page C1‐12
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

156 NEI42338102 NEI42341A371 NEI42341B139 NEI42357158 NEI42385203 NEI42410436 NEI42482341 NEI42486500 NEI42495117 NEI42689215 NEI42690617 NEI42695164 NEI42710192 NEI42730375 NEI42800223 NEI42961154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

216 NEI43202526 NEI43207244 NEI43472105 NEI45182111 NEI45206

Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Annual cost, $

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 97% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 98% Repeat testing

$28,000 $6,829$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0

$ 4,203,285 $ 189,012 $ 395,109 $ 584,120 $ 4,883,590 $ 214,620 $ 459,057 $ 673,677

$28,000 $6,829$34,000 $8,292

$ 5,020,540 $ 219,707 $ 471,931 $ 691,637 $ 6,361,360 $ 268,481 $ 597,968 $ 866,448 $48,000 $11,707

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

$ 2,147,603 $ 107,023 $ 201,875 $ 308,898 $ 2,721,158 $ 130,782 $ 255,789 $ 386,571 $28,000 $6,829

$0 $0

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $42,000 $10,243

$14,000 $3,414

$0 $0$0 $0

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$62,000 $15,121

$0 $0$0 $0

$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779

$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

179 NEI45474 $ $ $ $185 NEI46599141 NEI46750162 NEI46760119 NEI46814184 NEI46817195 NEI46835340 NEI46852122 NEI46866148 NEI46931107 NEI47074200 NEI47077606 NEI47091176 NEI47104189 NEI54342365 NEI54400181 NEI6057514 NEI6175610 NEI6261150 NEI6273147 NEI6450

$ 1,404,967 $ 74,712 $ 132,067 $ 206,778 $48,000 $11,707

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779

$62,000 $15,121$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$42,000 $10,243$62,000 $15,121

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$42,000 $10,243$42,000 $10,243

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$48,000 $11,707$42,000 $10,243$62,000 $15,121$14,000 $3,414

$ 1,927,136 $ 97,641 $ 181,151 $ 278,792

$28,000 $6,829

$0 $0

$ 5,101,559 $ 222,706 $ 479,547 $ 702,252 $ 7,121,817 $ 295,427 $ 669,451 $ 964,877

$48,000 $11,707

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$62,000 $15,121

$ 7,153,925 $ 296,554 $ 672,469 $ 969,023 $ 9,064,502 $ 362,388 $ 852,063 $ 1,214,451 $48,000 $11,707

Page C1‐13
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

207 NEI7104501 NEI7106182 NEI7181201 NEI7559146 NEI759127 NEI7933232 NEI8122159 NEI8177430 NEI8178531 NEI8186243 NEI8196132 NEI8261525 NEI8265124 NEI8278163 NEI8560205 NEI8601116 NEI8619103 NEI9201275 NEICT3102369 NEIGAT$3911511 NEIIL0215971425 NEIMA10626

Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Annual cost, $

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 97% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 98% Repeat testing

$48,000 $11,707

$0 $0

$ 2,173,801 $ 108,128 $ 204,337 $ 312,465 $ 3,034,643 $ 143,435 $ 285,256 $ 428,692 $48,000 $11,707

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$62,000 $15,121

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$42,000 $10,243

$0 $0

$42,000 $10,243$20,000 $4,878

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$42,000 $10,243

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$28,000 $6,829

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$62,000 $15,121

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $62,000 $15,121

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779

$42,000 $10,243$48,000 $11,707

$ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559

$42,000 $10,243

$ 2,667,866 $ 250,779 $ 250,779 $ 5,335,732 $ 501,559 $ 501,559 $62,000 $15,121

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

363 NEIME0250002

368611 NEIMN14904508513 NEINY5532600

496 NEINY5533400322 NEIPA1013489304 NEIVA00022518 NEIWA0270002254 NEIWI0793640520 NEIWI4050324

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

$0 $0

$42,000 $10,243

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

Page C1‐14
Appendix C1. Mill‐Specific Co

RTI ID NEI ID

382 NEIWI4710355224 NEIWI7500086,

NEIWIT$8597

516 NEIGAT$3909311 NEW73505

TOTAL

1. Note that 2 mills (RTI code 13

2. Determined HAP additive em

Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $

Operating

cost, $

Annualized

capital cost, $

Total annual

cost, $ Capital cost, $ Annual cost, $

Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 97% Kraft condensates improvement‐92% to 98% Repeat testing

$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0$0 $0

$218,255,158 $4,219,215 $20,515,985 $24,735,200 $296,959,429 $5,765,501 $27,914,186 $33,679,688 $5,416,000 $1,320,911

Capital cost Annual cost

Kraft, soda,

semichem

$42,000 $10,243

Kraft mills

usingbiotreatment

$28,000 $6,829

Sulfite $14,000 $3,414Non‐chemical

pulping

$0 $0

No pulping $0 $0Bleaching w/Cl cmpd

$20,000 $4,878

Bleaching w/o

Cl cmpd

$0 $0

No bleaching $0 $0

Pulping/ Repeat testing mill cost

bleaching

Page C1‐15
Appendix C2. Mill‐Specific Impacts Estimates for Regulatory Options under Consideration for the Subpart S RTR Proposal

Improvement 1 RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Current

system

capacity,

gal/d

Upgrade

required,

gal/d 2

Wastewater

impacts, MM

gal/yr

Biological system

upgrade annual

energy O&M

cost, $

Electricity,

kWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr PM, lb/yr CO, lb/y

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Biotreatment 12,000,000 130,435 47 $9,053 90,530 91 309 5.0 3

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL Biotreatment 28,100,000 305,435 110 $20,941 209,409 209 715 12 8

104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK Stripping

178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL Stripping

TOTAL 93% 157 $29,994 299,939 300 1,024 17 12

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Biotreatment 12,000,000 260,870 94 $17,926 179,261 179 612 10 7

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL Biotreatment 28,100,000 610,870 220 $41,466 414,659 415 1,416 23 17

140 NEI13340 Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC Halsey OR Biotreatment 10,900,000 117,204 42 $8,147 81,472 81 278 4.5 3

152 NEI11338 Wickliffe Paper Company Wickliffe KY Biotreatment 21,300,000 229,032 82 $15,768 157,679 158 539 8.8 6

208228535 NEI18373 Alabama River Cellulose, LLC Perdue Hill AL Biotreatment 48,500,000 521,505 188 $35,481 354,805 355 1,212 20 14

138 NEI18652 Clearwater Paper Corporation Arkansas City AR Biotreatment 15,000,000 161,290 58 $11,160 111,604 112 381 6.2 4

167 NEI34070 International Paper Co. ‐ Vicksburg

Mill

Redwood MS Biotreatment 14,600,000 156,989 57 $10,867 108,670 109 371 6.1 4

104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK Stripping

178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL Stripping

613 NEI11172 Georgia Pacific Monticello LLC Monticello MS Stripping

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

NewPage, Wisconsin Systems Inc. Wisconsin Rapids WI Stripping/Recycle

195 NEI46835 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME Stripping

148 NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Corporation Cottonton AL Stripping

150 NEI6273 Rumford Paper Company RUMFORD ME Stripping/Recycle243 NEI8196 GP Cellulose, LLC. Brunswick GA Stripping

TOTAL 94% 741 $140,815 1,408,151 1,408 4,809 78 57

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Biotreatment 12,000,000 391,304 141 $26,733 267,327 267 913 15 11

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL Biotreatment 28,100,000 916,304 330 $61,837 618,367 618 2,112 34 25

140 NEI13340 Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC Halsey OR Biotreatment 10,900,000 234,409 84 $16,133 161,327 161 551 9.0 6

152 NEI11338 Wickliffe Paper Company Wickliffe KY Biotreatment 21,300,000 458,065 165 $31,223 312,226 312 1,066 17 12

208228535 NEI18373 Alabama River Cellulose, LLC Perdue Hill AL Biotreatment 48,500,000 1,043,011 375 $70,256 702,563 703 2,399 39 28

138 NEI18652 Clearwater Paper Corporation Arkansas City AR Biotreatment 15,000,000 322,581 116 $22,099 220,991 221 755 12 9

167 NEI34070 International Paper Co. ‐ Vicksburg

Mill

Redwood MS Biotreatment 14,600,000 313,978 113 $21,518 215,181 215 735 12 8

104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK Stripping

178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL Stripping

613 NEI11172 Georgia Pacific Monticello LLC Monticello MS Stripping

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

NewPage, Wisconsin Systems Inc. Wisconsin Rapids WI Stripping/Recycle

195 NEI46835 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME Stripping

148 NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Corporation Cottonton AL Stripping

150 NEI6273 Rumford Paper Company RUMFORD ME Stripping/Recycle243 NEI8196 GP Cellulose, LLC. Brunswick GA Stripping

121 NEI12492 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX Biotreatment 15,900,000 169,149 61 $11,696 116,961 117 399 6.5 4

197 NEI18657 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR Biotreatment 4,130,000 43,936 16 $3,098 30,976 31 106 1.7 1

131 NEI42254 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation West Point VA Biotreatment 18,900,000 201,064 72 $13,868 138,684 139 474 7.7 5

203 NEI42410 Boise White Paper LLC Wallula WA Biotreatment 25,360,000 269,787 97 $18,530 185,300 185 633 10 7

117 NEI42689 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC. Mosinee WI Biotreatment 9,035,000 96,117 35 $6,701 67,005 67 229 3.7 2147 NEI6450 WESTVACO TEXAS LP EVADALE TX Biotreatment 39,000,000 414,894 149 $28,320 283,203 283 967 16 11

531 NEI8186 International Paper Company Savannah GA Stripping and biotreatment

120 NEI26495 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA Stripping and biotreatment

116 NEI8619 International Paper Company Pine Hill AL Stripping and biotreatment

201 NEI7559 Boise Packaging and Newsprint, LLC DeRidder LA Stripping

155 NEI33883 Escanaba Paper Company Escanaba MI Stripping

226 NEI33023 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Hodge LA Stripping

199 NEI18390 AbiBow US Inc. ‐ Coosa Pines

Operations

Coosa Pines AL Stripping

TOTAL 95% 1,755 $332,011 3,320,110 3,320 11,339 185 1,36

93%94%95%

C2‐1
Improvement 1 RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Current

system

capacity,

gal/d

Upgrade

required,

gal/d 2

Wastewater

impacts, MM

gal/yr

Biological system

upgrade annual

energy O&M

cost, $

Electricity,

kWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr PM, lb/yr CO, lb/y

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Biotreatment 12,000,000 521,739 188 $35,496 354,962 355 1,212 20 14

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL Biotreatment 28,100,000 1,221,739 440 $82,108 821,081 821 2,804 46 33

140 NEI13340 Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC Halsey OR Biotreatment 10,900,000 351,613 127 $24,058 240,581 241 822 13 9

152 NEI11338 Wickliffe Paper Company Wickliffe KY Biotreatment 21,300,000 687,097 247 $46,561 465,613 466 1,590 26 19

208228535 NEI18373 Alabama River Cellulose, LLC Perdue Hill AL Biotreatment 48,500,000 1,564,516 563 $104,771 1,047,709 1,048 3,578 58 43

138 NEI18652 Clearwater Paper Corporation Arkansas City AR Biotreatment 15,000,000 483,871 174 $32,956 329,556 330 1,125 18 13

167 NEI34070 International Paper Co. ‐ Vicksburg

Mill

Redwood MS Biotreatment 14,600,000 470,968 170 $32,089 320,893 321 1,096 18 13

104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK Stripping

178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL Stripping

613 NEI11172 Georgia Pacific Monticello LLC Monticello MS Stripping

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

NewPage, Wisconsin Systems Inc. Wisconsin Rapids WI Stripping/Recycle

195 NEI46835 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME Stripping

148 NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Corporation Cottonton AL Stripping

150 NEI6273 Rumford Paper Company RUMFORD ME Stripping/Recycle243 NEI8196 GP Cellulose, LLC. Brunswick GA Stripping

121 NEI12492 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX Biotreatment 15,900,000 338,298 122 $23,160 231,599 232 791 13 9

197 NEI18657 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR Biotreatment 4,130,000 87,872 32 $6,134 61,337 61 209 3.4 2131 NEI42254 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation West Point VA Biotreatment 18,900,000 402,128 145 $27,461 274,613 275 938 15 11

203 NEI42410 Boise White Paper LLC Wallula WA Biotreatment 25,360,000 539,574 194 $36,692 366,919 367 1,253 20 15

117 NEI42689 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC. Mosinee WI Biotreatment 9,035,000 192,234 69 $13,268 132,679 133 453 7.4 5

147 NEI6450 WESTVACO TEXAS LP EVADALE TX Biotreatment 39,000,000 829,787 299 $56,078 560,781 561 1,915 31 23531 NEI8186 International Paper Company Savannah GA Stripping and biotreatment

120 NEI26495 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA Stripping and biotreatment

116 NEI8619 International Paper Company Pine Hill AL Stripping and biotreatment

201 NEI7559 Boise Packaging and Newsprint, LLC DeRidder LA Stripping

155 NEI33883 Escanaba Paper Company Escanaba MI Stripping

226 NEI33023 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Hodge LA Stripping

199 NEI18390 AbiBow US Inc. ‐ Coosa Pines

Operations

Coosa Pines AL Stripping

130 NEI18338 Georgia‐Pacific Brewton LLC Brewton AL Biotreatment 23,200,000 244,211 88 $16,797 167,973 168 574 9.4 6

114 NEI26506 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Oglethorpe GA Biotreatment 9,200,000 96,842 35 $6,750 67,503 68 231 3.8 2

240 NEI26526 Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC JESUP GA Biotreatment 54,900,000 577,895 208 $39,259 392,589 393 1,341 22 16

165 NEI41628 International Paper Company Queen City TX Biotreatment 30,970,000 326,000 117 $22,330 223,299 223 763 12 9

610 NEI6261 Verso Androscoggin LLC Jay ME Biotreatment 39,200,000 412,632 149 $28,168 281,681 282 962 16 11

182 NEI7181 PH Glatfelter Spring Grove PA Biotreatment 13,900,000 146,316 53 $10,138 101,384 101 346 5.6 4

108 NEI33025 International Paper Campti LA Stripping

151 NEI41252 KapStone North Charleston SC Stripping

164 NEI42710 Thilmany,LLC Kaukauna WI Stripping and biotreatment

162 NEI46760 International Paper Eastover SC Stripping

146 NEI759 MeadWestvaco of Virginia, Inc Covington VA Stripping

525 NEI8265 Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations

LLC

Palatka FL Stripping

103 NEI9201 Domtar Paper Company Plymouth NC Stripping

TOTAL 96% 3,418 $644,275 6,442,754 6,443 22,003 359 2,64

96%

C2‐2
Improvement 1 RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Current

system

capacity,

gal/d

Upgrade

required,

gal/d 2

Wastewater

impacts, MM

gal/yr

Biological system

upgrade annual

energy O&M

cost, $

Electricity,

kWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr PM, lb/yr CO, lb/y

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Biotreatment 12,000,000 652,174 235 $44,228 442,279 442 1,510 25 18

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL Biotreatment 28,100,000 1,527,174 550 $102,306 1,023,058 1,023 3,494 57 41

140 NEI13340 Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC Halsey OR Biotreatment 10,900,000 468,817 169 $31,945 319,449 319 1,091 18 13

152 NEI11338 Wickliffe Paper Company Wickliffe KY Biotreatment 21,300,000 916,129 330 $61,825 618,250 618 2,111 34 25

208228535 NEI18373 Alabama River Cellulose, LLC Perdue Hill AL Biotreatment 48,500,000 2,086,022 751 $139,117 1,391,171 1,391 4,751 77 57

138 NEI18652 Clearwater Paper Corporation Arkansas City AR Biotreatment 15,000,000 645,161 232 $43,759 437,592 438 1,494 24 17

167 NEI34070 International Paper Co. ‐ Vicksburg

Mill

Redwood MS Biotreatment 14,600,000 627,957 226 $42,609 426,088 426 1,455 24 17

104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK Stripping

178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL Stripping

613 NEI11172 Georgia Pacific Monticello LLC Monticello MS Stripping

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

NewPage, Wisconsin Systems Inc. Wisconsin Rapids WI Stripping/Recycle

195 NEI46835 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME Stripping

148 NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Corporation Cottonton AL Stripping

150 NEI6273 Rumford Paper Company RUMFORD ME Stripping/Recycle243 NEI8196 GP Cellulose, LLC. Brunswick GA Stripping

121 NEI12492 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX Biotreatment 15,900,000 507,447 183 $34,538 345,377 345 1,180 19 14

197 NEI18657 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR Biotreatment 4,130,000 131,809 47 $9,147 91,469 91 312 5.1 3131 NEI42254 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation West Point VA Biotreatment 18,900,000 603,191 217 $40,952 409,521 410 1,399 23 16

203 NEI42410 Boise White Paper LLC Wallula WA Biotreatment 25,360,000 809,362 291 $54,717 547,174 547 1,869 30 22

117 NEI42689 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC. Mosinee WI Biotreatment 9,035,000 288,351 104 $19,786 197,860 198 676 11 8147 NEI6450 WESTVACO TEXAS LP EVADALE TX Biotreatment 39,000,000 1,244,681 448 $83,627 836,275 836 2,856 47 34531 NEI8186 International Paper Company Savannah GA Stripping and biotreatment

120 NEI26495 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA Stripping and biotreatment

116 NEI8619 International Paper Company Pine Hill AL Stripping and biotreatment

201 NEI7559 Boise Packaging and Newsprint, LLC DeRidder LA Stripping

155 NEI33883 Escanaba Paper Company Escanaba MI Stripping

226 NEI33023 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Hodge LA Stripping

199 NEI18390 AbiBow US Inc. ‐ Coosa Pines

Operations

Coosa Pines AL Stripping

130 NEI18338 Georgia‐Pacific Brewton LLC Brewton AL Biotreatment 23,200,000 488,421 176 $33,261 332,610 333 1,136 19 13

114 NEI26506 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Oglethorpe GA Biotreatment 9,200,000 193,684 70 $13,367 133,666 134 456 7.4 5

240 NEI26526 Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC JESUP GA Biotreatment 54,900,000 1,155,789 416 $77,738 777,380 777 2,655 43 31

165 NEI41628 International Paper Company Queen City TX Biotreatment 30,970,000 652,000 235 $44,216 442,163 442 1,510 25 18

610 NEI6261 Verso Androscoggin LLC Jay ME Biotreatment 39,200,000 825,263 297 $55,777 557,768 558 1,905 31 22

182 NEI7181 PH Glatfelter Spring Grove PA Biotreatment 13,900,000 292,632 105 $20,075 200,755 201 686 11 8

108 NEI33025 International Paper Campti LA Stripping

151 NEI41252 KapStone North Charleston SC Stripping

164 NEI42710 Thilmany,LLC Kaukauna WI Stripping and biotreatment

162 NEI46760 International Paper Eastover SC Stripping

146 NEI759 MeadWestvaco of Virginia, Inc Covington VA Stripping

525 NEI8265 Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations

LLC

Palatka FL Stripping

103 NEI9201 Domtar Paper Company Plymouth NC Stripping

186 NEI18334 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products

LP (Naheola Mill)

Pennington AL Biotreatment 49,000,000 510,417 184 $34,737 347,369 347 1,186 19 14

171 NEI18658 Evergreen Packaging Inc Pine Bluff AR Biotreatment 26,350,000 274,479 99 $18,848 188,475 188 644 10 7

175 NEI26514 International Paper Company AUGUSTA GA Biotreatment 35,000,000 364,583 131 $24,933 249,326 249 851 14 10

183 NEI33103 Red Shield Acquisition, LLC Old Town ME Biotreatment 10,100,000 105,208 38 $7,325 73,247 73 250 4.1 3

135 NEI33118 S.D. Warren Company ‐ Somerset

Operations

Skowhegan ME Stripping and biotreatment

166 NEI41314 International Paper Georgetown SC Stripping and biotreatment

600 NEI18357 International Paper Company Courtland AL Stripping

115 NEI26476 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Port Wentworth GA Stripping

112 NEI34064 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Columbus MS Stripping

242 NEI34066 Leaf River Cellulose, LLC New Augusta MS Stripping

174 NEI40247 International Paper, Inc Riegelwood NC Stripping

105 NEI45182 International Paper Company Springfield OR Stripping

185 NEI46599 Georgia Pacific Consumer Products

(Camas), LLC

CAMAS WA Stripping

TOTAL 97% 5,533 $1,038,832 10,388,322 10,388 35,478 579 4,25

97%

C2‐3
Improvement 1 RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Current

system

capacity,

gal/d

Upgrade

required,

gal/d 2

Wastewater

impacts, MM

gal/yr

Biological system

upgrade annual

energy O&M

cost, $

Electricity,

kWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr PM, lb/yr CO, lb/y

139 NEI42357 PORT TOWNSEND PAPER CORP Port Townsend WA Biotreatment 12,000,000 782,609 282 $52,934 529,343 529 1,808 29 21

172 NEI18335 International Paper Company Selma AL Biotreatment 28,100,000 1,832,609 660 $122,445 1,224,451 1,224 4,182 68 50

140 NEI13340 Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC Halsey OR Biotreatment 10,900,000 586,022 211 $39,803 398,030 398 1,359 22 16

152 NEI11338 Wickliffe Paper Company Wickliffe KY Biotreatment 21,300,000 1,145,161 412 $77,033 770,334 770 2,631 43 31

208228535 NEI18373 Alabama River Cellulose, LLC Perdue Hill AL Biotreatment 48,500,000 2,607,527 939 $173,338 1,733,385 1,733 5,920 97 71

138 NEI18652 Clearwater Paper Corporation Arkansas City AR Biotreatment 15,000,000 806,452 290 $54,523 545,235 545 1,862 30 22

167 NEI34070 International Paper Co. ‐ Vicksburg

Mill

Redwood MS Biotreatment 14,600,000 784,946 283 $53,090 530,902 531 1,813 30 21

104 NEI11251 International Paper Valliant OK Stripping

178 NEI26309 International Paper Cantonment FL Stripping

613 NEI11172 Georgia Pacific Monticello LLC Monticello MS Stripping

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116

NewPage, Wisconsin Systems Inc. Wisconsin Rapids WI Stripping/Recycle

195 NEI46835 Woodland Pulp LLC Baileyville ME Stripping

148 NEI46931 MeadWestvaco Corporation Cottonton AL Stripping

150 NEI6273 Rumford Paper Company RUMFORD ME Stripping/Recycle243 NEI8196 GP Cellulose, LLC. Brunswick GA Stripping

121 NEI12492 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Orange TX Biotreatment 15,900,000 676,596 244 $45,860 458,598 459 1,566 26 18

197 NEI18657 Delta Natural Kraft Pine Bluff AR Biotreatment 4,130,000 175,745 63 $12,146 121,455 121 415 6.8 5

131 NEI42254 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation West Point VA Biotreatment 18,900,000 804,255 290 $54,377 543,771 544 1,857 30 22

203 NEI42410 Boise White Paper LLC Wallula WA Biotreatment 25,360,000 1,079,149 388 $72,655 726,549 727 2,481 40 29

117 NEI42689 Wausau Paper Mills, LLC. Mosinee WI Biotreatment 9,035,000 384,468 138 $26,272 262,723 263 897 15 10147 NEI6450 WESTVACO TEXAS LP EVADALE TX Biotreatment 39,000,000 1,659,574 597 $111,042 1,110,424 1,110 3,792 62 45531 NEI8186 International Paper Company Savannah GA Stripping and biotreatment

120 NEI26495 TIN Inc. dba Temple‐Inland Rome GA Stripping and biotreatment

116 NEI8619 International Paper Company Pine Hill AL Stripping and biotreatment

201 NEI7559 Boise Packaging and Newsprint, LLC DeRidder LA Stripping

155 NEI33883 Escanaba Paper Company Escanaba MI Stripping

226 NEI33023 Smurfit‐Stone Container Corporation Hodge LA Stripping

199 NEI18390 AbiBow US Inc. ‐ Coosa Pines

Operations

Coosa Pines AL Stripping

130 NEI18338 Georgia‐Pacific Brewton LLC Brewton AL Biotreatment 23,200,000 732,632 264 $49,601 496,011 496 1,694 28 20

114 NEI26506 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Oglethorpe GA Biotreatment 9,200,000 290,526 105 $19,933 199,331 199 681 11 8

240 NEI26526 Rayonier Performance Fibers, LLC JESUP GA Biotreatment 54,900,000 1,733,684 624 $115,928 1,159,281 1,159 3,959 65 47

165 NEI41628 International Paper Company Queen City TX Biotreatment 30,970,000 978,000 352 $65,938 659,383 659 2,252 37 27

610 NEI6261 Verso Androscoggin LLC Jay ME Biotreatment 39,200,000 1,237,895 446 $83,178 831,781 832 2,841 46 34

182 NEI7181 PH Glatfelter Spring Grove PA Biotreatment 13,900,000 438,947 158 $29,938 299,379 299 1,022 17 12

108 NEI33025 International Paper Campti LA Stripping

151 NEI41252 KapStone North Charleston SC Stripping

164 NEI42710 Thilmany,LLC Kaukauna WI Stripping and biotreatment

162 NEI46760 International Paper Eastover SC Stripping

146 NEI759 MeadWestvaco of Virginia, Inc Covington VA Stripping

525 NEI8265 Georgia Pacific Consumer Operations

LLC

Palatka FL Stripping

103 NEI9201 Domtar Paper Company Plymouth NC Stripping

186 NEI18334 Georgia‐Pacific Consumer Products

LP (Naheola Mill)

Pennington AL Biotreatment 49,000,000 1,020,833 368 $68,784 687,837 688 2,349 38 28

171 NEI18658 Evergreen Packaging Inc Pine Bluff AR Biotreatment 26,350,000 548,958 198 $37,321 373,207 373 1,275 21 15

175 NEI26514 International Paper Company AUGUSTA GA Biotreatment 35,000,000 729,167 263 $49,370 493,699 494 1,686 27 20

183 NEI33103 Red Shield Acquisition, LLC Old Town ME Biotreatment 10,100,000 210,417 76 $14,504 145,040 145 495 8.1 5

135 NEI33118 S.D. Warren Company ‐ Somerset

Operations

Skowhegan ME Stripping and biotreatment

166 NEI41314 International Paper Georgetown SC Stripping and biotreatment

600 NEI18357 International Paper Company Courtland AL Stripping

115 NEI26476 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Port Wentworth GA Stripping

112 NEI34064 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Columbus MS Stripping

242 NEI34066 Leaf River Cellulose, LLC New Augusta MS Stripping

174 NEI40247 International Paper, Inc Riegelwood NC Stripping

105 NEI45182 International Paper Company Springfield OR Stripping

185 NEI46599 Georgia Pacific Consumer Products

(Camas), LLC

CAMAS WA Stripping

202 NEI12411 Boise White Paper, LLC International Falls MN Biotreatment 25,240,000 260,206 94 $17,881 178,812 179 611 10 7

196 NEI18660 Domtar A.W. LLC Ashdown AR Biotreatment 51,000,000 525,773 189 $35,767 357,667 358 1,221 20 14

179 NEI45474 Rock‐Tenn Mill Company, LLC Demopolis AL Biotreatment 16,700,000 172,165 62 $11,902 119,016 119 406 6.6 4

181 NEI6057 Graphic Packaging International Inc. West Monroe LA Biotreatment 24,520,000 252,784 91 $17,378 173,784 174 594 9.7 7

190 NEI26491 Georgia‐Pacific Cedar Springs, LLC Cedar Springs GA Stripping

98%

C2‐4
Improvement 1 RTI ID NEI ID Mill name City State

Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method

Current

system

capacity,

gal/d

Upgrade

required,

gal/d 2

Wastewater

impacts, MM

gal/yr

Biological system

upgrade annual

energy O&M

cost, $

Electricity,

kWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MWh/yr

Energy

impacts,

MMBtu/yr PM, lb/yr CO, lb/y

149 NEI40488 P.H. Glatfelter Company ‐ Chillicothe

Facility

Chillicothe OH Stripping

617 NEI42695 Domtar A.W. LLC Nekoosa WI Stripping

111 NEI45206 Weyerhaeuser NR Company Vanceboro NC Stripping

107 NEI47074 Domtar Paper Company LLC Bennettsville SC Stripping

200 NEI47077 AbiBow US Inc. Catawba SC Stripping

124 NEI8278 Smurfit Stone Container Corp Panama City FL Stripping

163 NEI8560 International Paper Company Prattville AL Stripping

TOTAL 98% 8,085 $1,512,943 15,129,428 15,129 51,670 843 6,20

1. The methodology used to determine the current performance level based on the Part I results is summarized in a separate memo, "Summary of Kraft Condensate Control Technology Review."

2. WWT Upgrade Required: proportional; 92 > 93 = Current Size * 93/92, etc.

Emission factors Value Fuel

% of

generation

Improve‐

ment PM, tpy CO, tpy 

1.9 Coal 53% 93% total 0.01 0.0

0.00186275 Oil/natural gas 21% 94% total 0.04 0.

0.03 Nuclear 17% 95% total 0.09 0.

84 Hydroelectric 6% 96% total 0.2 1.

0.0824 Renewable 2% 97% total 0.3 2.

0.19 Other 1% 98% total 0.4 3.

100 Notes:

0.0980 1. Assume electricity generated using the above mix (from IPM Version 3.0 

0.38 for the year 2015). 

0.6 2. IPM = EPA Integrated Planning Model, which is a multi‐regional, dynamic, 

0.00059 deterministic linear programmingmodel of the U.S. electric power sector that 

1.2 provides forecasts of least‐ cost capacity expansion, electricity dispatch, and 

53.02 emission control strategies for meeting energy demand and environmental, 

93.4 transmission, dispatch,and reliability constraints. 

0.001 0.011 

0.0001 Conversion factors Units 

0.0016 3415.179 Btu/kWh

Notes: 2.204623 lb/kg

1. For natural gas combustion, used AP‐42 emission factors for PM, CO, NOx, and SO2, 1,020 Btu/ft3 natural gas

and used 40 CFR part 98, subpart C emission factors for CO2, CH4, and N2O. 13,000 Btu/lb coal

Assumed 1,020 Btu/ft3 of natural gas in estimating secondary emissions

2. For solid fuel combustion, used NSPS emission factors for PM and SO2 (40 CFR part 60,

subpart Da, coal‐fired utility plants), used AP‐42 emission factors for NOx and CO(bituminuous/subbituminous coal combustion/spreader stoker). The NOx emissionfactor was based on average of NOx emission factors for spreader stoker type boilersburning bituminous (11 lb/ton) and subbituminous (8.8 lb/ton) coal. Assumed 13,000Btu/lb of coal in estimating NOx and CO secondary emissions. Used 40 CFR part 98,subpart C emission factors for CO2 (bituminous coal) and CH4 and N2O (coal/coke).

kg/MMBtu natural gas

kg/MMBtu solid fuellb/MMBtu solid fuel

lb/MM ft3 natural gas

lb/MMBtu natural gas

lb/MMBtu solid fuel

kg/MMBtu natural gas

kg/MMBtu solid fuel

lb/MMBtu natural gas

lb/MMBtu solid fuel

lb/MM ft3 natural gas

lb/MMBtu natural gas

kg/MMBtu natural gas

kg/MMBtu solid fuel

NOX

SO2CO2

CH4

N2O

Units

lb/MM ft3 natural gas

lb/MMBtu natural gas

lb/MMBtu solid, liquid, gaseous fuel

lb/MM ft3 natural gas

98%, continued

Assumed equivalent to natural gas

Notes

No secondary air emissions estimated

No secondary air emissions estimated

No secondary air emissions estimated

PM

CO

C2‐5