alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------

                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 14, 2007


(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William Swain, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ William Swain
                                       -----------------

                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 14, 2007
### §2008. Procedures for waiver of Federal law

#### (a) Waiver of provisions of Federal law

The President may identify those provisions of Federal law (including any law or laws regarding the location of a crude oil transportation system but not including any provision of the antitrust laws) which, in the national interest, as determined by the President, should be waived in whole or in part to facilitate construction or operation of any such system approved under section 2007 of this title or of the Long Beach-Midland project, and he shall submit any such proposed waiver to both Houses of the Congress. The provisions so identified shall be waived with respect to actions to be taken to construct or operate such system or project only upon enactment of a joint resolution within the first period of 60 calendar days of continuous session of Congress beginning on the date of receipt by the House of Representatives and the Senate of such proposal.

#### (b) Joint resolution

The resolving clause of the joint resolution referred to in subsection (a) is as follows: "That the House of Representatives and Senate approve the waiver of the provisions of law (    ) as proposed by the President, submitted to the Congress on      , 19 .". The first blank space therein being filled with the citation to the provisions of law proposed to be waived by the President and the second blank space therein being filled with the date on which the President submits his decision to wave 1 such provisions of law to the House of Representatives and the Senate. Rules and procedures for consideration of any such joint resolution shall be governed by section 719f(c) and (d) of title 15, other than paragraph (2) of section 719f(d) of title 15, except that for the purposes of this subsection, the phrase "a waiver of provisions of law" shall be substituted in section 719f(d) of title 15 each place where the phrase "an Alaska natural gas transportation system" appears.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title V, §508, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3162.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definition of "antitrust laws" in section 2602 of Title 16, Conservation, applies to this section.

1 So in original. Probably should be "waive".
### §945b. Jurisdiction; procedure

Jurisdiction of an action brought by the United States or the landowner for the determination of just compensation pursuant to section 945a of this title is hereby conferred on the United States district court in the district in which any such land is situated, without limitation to the amount of compensation sought by such suit. The procedure for such an action shall be governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the condemnation of real and personal property.

(Pub. L. 88–561, §2, as added Pub. L. 89–624, Oct. 4, 1966, 80 Stat. 874.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the condemnation of real and personal property, referred to in text, means rule 71A of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable to Federal condemnation actions pending in any district court of the United States on or after Oct. 4, 1966, see section 3 of Pub. L. 88–561, as added by Pub. L. 89–624, set out as an Effective Date of 1966 Amendment note under section 945a of this title.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Otto Seefeldt and William Brims, plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 28,285.

Conviction for conspiracy to injure a business by unlawfully preventing workmen from continuing on a building. Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas J. Lynch, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 26, 1923.

Rehearing denied July 7, 1923.

Hope Thompson and John D. Farrell, for plaintiffs in error. Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson and Clyde C. Fisher, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Fitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 219.1 Program operations.

Effective May 1, 1996, the Flexible Subsidy Program for Troubled Projects will be governed and operate under the statutory provisions codified at 12 U.S.C. 1715z-1a, under the administrative policies and procedures contained in any applicable HUD Handbooks, and other administrative bulletins and notices as the Department may issue from time to time.
```

[Federal Register: February 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 27)]
[Notices]               
[Page 6651]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10fe10-48]                         


[[Page 6651]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Office of Science; High Energy Physics Advisory Panel

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the High Energy Physics 
Advisory Panel (HEPAP). Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-
463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, March 11, 2010; 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Friday, March 
12, 2010; 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hyatt Regency, One Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 
20814.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kogut, Executive Secretary; High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel; U.S. Department of Energy; SC-25/
Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone: 301-903-1298

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and guidance on a continuing 
basis with respect to the high energy physics research program.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:
    Thursday, March 11, 2010 and Friday, March 12, 2010.
 Discussion of Department of Energy High Energy Physics 
Program.
 Discussion of National Science Foundation Elementary Particle 
Physics Program.
 Reports on and Discussions of Topics of General Interest in 
High Energy Physics.
 Public Comment (10-minute rule).

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Panel, you may do so 
either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should 
contact John Kogut, 301-903-1298 or John.Kogut@science.doe.gov (e-
mail). You must make your request for an oral statement at least 5 
business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to 
include the scheduled oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of 
the Panel will conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business. Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public 
review and copying within 90 days on the High Energy Physics Advisory 
Panel Web site. Minutes will also be available by writing or calling 
John Kogut at the address and phone number listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 3, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-2931 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 32

                              THINKING TOOLS, INC.
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinking Tools, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Dated: February 12, 2004
                                                  By: Moshe Zarmi
                                                      ------------------------
                                                  Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                                  Title: President and Chief
                                                         Executive Officer and
                                                         principal accounting
                                                         officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00374-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A. III, J.E.A., F.E.A., F.A.A., R.L., JR., AND B.J.L.

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-02352

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 4, 2021, the trial court signed a final judgment terminating appellant’s 

parental rights to her children. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was 

due to be filed on August 24, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.1(b), 28.4. A motion for 

extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due to be filed on September 8, 2021. See id. 

R. 26.3. On September 1, 2021, appellant filed her notice of appeal. Although appellant filed a 

notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, she did not file a 

motion for extension of time.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day 

grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. 

Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, 

the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a 

timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); see also Hone v. Hanafin, 104 

S.W.3d 884, 886–87 (Tex. 2003) (holding “a reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement 

of circumstances indicating that failure to timely file was not deliberate or intentional but was the 

result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance, and that “any conduct short of deliberate or 

intentional noncompliance qualifies as inadvertence, mistake or mischance”) (citation ommitted).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, within seven days from the date of this 

order, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file a notice of appeal in a 

timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH GUICE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

D & R CONSTRUCTION, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. CV-09-1464 MMC 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

() Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

(X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The

issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Court hereby GRANTS in part and

DENIES in part the motions, as follows:

1. To the extent plaintiffs seek an award of compensatory damages, the motions

are hereby GRANTED, and:

a. Kenneth Guice shall have judgment against defendants in the amount of

$126,380.59; and

b. Patricia Rose shall have judgment against defendants in the amount of

$173,378.90.

2. To the extent plaintiffs seek an award of costs, the motions are hereby

GRANTED and plaintiffs are jointly awarded costs in the total amount of $530.

Case 3:09-cv-01464-MMC Document 38 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. To the extent plaintiffs seek an award of prejudgment interest, the motions are

hereby DENIED, in light of plaintiffs having withdrawn their respective claims to such

relief. 

4. To the extent plaintiffs seek an award of attorneys’ fees, the motions are hereby

DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court’s order of December 7, 2009. 

Dated: January 15, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Tracy Lucero

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:09-cv-01464-MMC Document 38 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DAVID CASAS-HERRERA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50107

D.C. No. 3:06-cr-00810-WQH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

David Casas-Herrera appeals from the 10-month sentence imposed

following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

NOV 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50107

Casas-Herrera contends that the sentence is unreasonable because the district

court procedurally erred in failing to adequately address his mitigating arguments

and explain the reasons for imposing a 10-month sentence. The record reflects that

the district court did not procedurally err. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338,

358-59 (2007). The record also reflects that, under the totality of the

circumstances, Casas-Herrera’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See Gall v.

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51-52 (2007); see also United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d

984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
### §1464. Agents or attorneys representing claimants before department

The Secretary of the Interior may prescribe rules and regulations governing the recognition of agents, attorneys, or other persons representing claimants before his department, and may require of such persons, agents, and attorneys, before being recognized as representatives of claimants, that they shall show that they are of good moral character and in good repute, possessed of the necessary qualifications to enable them to render such claimants valuable service, and otherwise competent to advise and assist such claimants in the presentation of their claims and such Secretary may, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, suspend or exclude from further practice before his department any such person, agent, or attorney shown to be incompetent, disreputable, or who refuses to comply with the said rules and regulations, or who shall with intent to defraud in any manner, deceive, mislead, or threaten any claimant, or prospective claimant, by word, circular, letter, or by advertisement.

(July 4, 1884, ch. 181, §5, 23 Stat. 101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 493 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2978 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2978

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To allow the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian 
  Reservation to enter into a lease or other temporary conveyance of 
  water rights recognized under the Fort Peck-Montana Compact for the 
   purpose of meeting the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water 
           Association, Incorporated, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MONTANA INDIAN TRIBES; AGREEMENT WITH DRY PRAIRIE RURAL 
              WATER ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED.

    (a) In General.--The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck 
Indian Reservation (referred to in this section as the ``Tribes'') may, 
with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, enter into a lease 
or other temporary conveyance of water rights recognized under the Fort 
Peck-Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85-20-201) for the purpose 
of meeting the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, 
Incorporated (or any successor entity), in accordance with section 5 of 
the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000 (Public Law 
106-382; 114 Stat. 1454).
    (b) Conditions of Lease.--With respect to a lease or other 
temporary conveyance described in subsection (a)--
            (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall not exceed 
        100 years;
            (2) the lease or conveyance may be approved by the 
        Secretary of the Interior without monetary compensation to the 
        Tribes; and
            (3) the Secretary of the Interior shall not be subject to 
        liability for any claim or cause of action relating to the 
        compensation or consideration received by the Tribes under the 
        lease or conveyance.
    (c) No Permanent Alienation of Water.--Nothing in this section 
authorizes any permanent alienation of any water by the Tribes.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 16, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2978

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To allow the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian 
  Reservation to enter into a lease or other temporary conveyance of 
  water rights recognized under the Fort Peck-Montana Compact for the 
   purpose of meeting the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water 
           Association, Incorporated, and for other purposes.
```