alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1321. Hydrographic Surveys; foreign surveys

Appropriations made for the preparation or publication of foreign hydrographic surveys may be applicable only upon approval by the Secretary of the Navy, after a report from three competent naval officers that the original data for proposed charts justify their publication. The Secretary of the Navy shall order a board of three naval officers to examine and report upon the data before he approves an application of moneys to the preparation or publication of charts or hydrographic surveys.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1269.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §265 (R.S. §3686; Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §78, 28 Stat. 621).
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 293 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the marriage 

penalty in the contribution rules for Roth IRAs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 20, 2005 

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the marriage penalty in the contribution rules for Roth IRAs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MARRIAGE PENALTY IN CON4 TRIBUTION RULES FOR ROTH IRAS. 

5 (a) PHASEOUT RANGE.—Clause (ii) of section 

6 408A(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re7 lating to dollar limit) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(ii) $15,000 ($30,000 in the case of 

9 a joint return).’’. 
2 

•HR 293 IH 

1 (b) PHASEOUT THRESHOLD.—Clause (ii) of section 

2 408A(c)(3)(C) of such Code is amended— 

3 (1) in subclause (I)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘$150,000’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘$190,000’’, and 

6 (B) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end, 

7 (2) in subclause (II) by striking ‘‘, and’’ and in8 serting a period, and 

9 (3) by striking subclause (III). 

10 (c) ROLLOVER FROM IRA.—Subparagraph (B) of 

11 section 408A(c)(3) of such Code is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘relates—’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘relates, the 

13 taxpayer’s adjusted gross income exceeds $100,000 

14 ($200,000 in the case of a joint return).’’. 

15 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

17 December 31, 2004. 

Æ
### §592. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Feb. 28, 1919, ch. 78, 40 Stat. 1210, granted leave of absence to any entryman who, prior to Feb. 28, 1919, made entry upon land withdrawn under reclamation law, until water became available for irrigation.
§ 92.55 Consular authority and responsibility for taking depositions. ( a ) *Requests to take depositions or designations to execute commissions to take depositions.* Any United States notarizing officer may be requested to take a deposition on notice, or designated to execute a commission to take depositions. A commission or notice should, if possible, identify the officer who is to take depositions by his official title only in the following manner: “Any notarizing officer of the United States of America at (name of locality)”. The notarizing officer responsible for the performance of notarial acts at a post should act on a request to take a deposition on notice, or should execute the commission, when the documents are drawn in this manner, provided local law does not preclude such action. However, when the officer (or officers) is designated by name as well as by title, only the officer (or officers) so designated may take the depositions. In either instance, the officer must be a disinterested party. Rule 28(c) of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the district courts of the United States prohibits the taking of a deposition before a person who is a relative, employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, or who is a relative or employee of such attorney or counsel, or who is financially interested in the action.
( b ) *Authority in Federal law.* The authority for the taking of depositions, charging the appropriate fees, and imposing the penalty for giving false evidence is generally set forth in 22 U.S.C. 4215 and 4221. The taking of depositions for federal courts of the United States is further governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the provisions of law which govern particularly the taking of depositions to prove the genuineness of foreign documents which it is desired to introduce in evidence in any criminal action or proceeding is a United States federal court, see 18 U.S.C. 3491 through 3496.
( c ) *Procedure where laws of the foreign country do not permit the taking of depositions.* In countries where the right to take depositions is not secured by treaty, notarizing officers may take depositions only if the laws or authorities of the national government will permit them to do so. Notarizing officers in countries where the taking of depositions is not permitted who receive notices or commissions for taking depositions should return the documents to the parties from whom they are received explaining why they are returning them, and indicating what other method or methods may be available for obtaining the depositions, whether by letters rogatory or otherwise.
[60 FR 51722, Oct. 3, 1995]
#### § 51.2 Authority.

This part implements the Department's responsibilities under: The National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*); sec. 2 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 1441); secs. 2 and 7(d) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3531 and 3535(d)); the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321); and the other statutes that are referred to in this part.

[61 FR 13333, Mar. 26, 1996]
### §3703. Rate of payment for advertisements, notices, and proposals

Advertisements, notices, proposals for contracts, and all forms of advertising required by law for the several departments of the Government may be paid for at a price not to exceed the commercial rates charged to private individuals, with the usual discounts. But the heads of the several departments may secure lower terms at special rates when the public interest requires it. The rates shall include the furnishing of lawful evidence, under oath, of publication, to be made and furnished by the printer or publisher making publication.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1305.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §§322, 325 (R.S. §853; June 20, 1878, ch. 359, §1, 20 Stat. 216; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1010, §5, 64 Stat. 986).

The second sentence of former section 325 was added. The balance was superseded by former section 322 which will be found in section 3703 of the revision.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3213 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3213

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on diiodomethyl-p-
                             tolylsulfone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on diiodomethyl-p-
                             tolylsulfone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIIODOMETHYL-P-TOLYLSULFONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Diiodomethyl-p-tolylsulfone) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Stipulated Notice of Dismissal

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway

Suite 200

Alameda, CA 94501-1091

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223

PATRICIA A. DAVIS, Bar No. 179074

NICOLE M. PHILLIPS, Bar No. 203786

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200

Alameda, CA 94501-1091

Telephone (510) 337-1001

Facsimile (510) 337-1023

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC

JAMES L. LEET (SBN 91894)

JAMIE M. ERRECART (SBN 214925)

MEREDITH A. FELDE (SBN 244511)

Attorneys at Law

500 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: 916.444.3900

Fax: 916.444.8334

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their capacities as 

Trustees of the LABORERS HEALTH AND 

WELFARE TRUST FUND 

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS 

VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; LABORERS PENSION 

TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and 

LABORERS TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

AIRCO MECHANICAL, INC., a California

Corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C09-2274 SC

STIPULATED NOTICE OF 

DISMISSAL FRCP 41(a)(1)

Case 3:09-cv-02274-SC Document 28 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Stipulated Notice of Dismissal

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway

Suite 200

Alameda, CA 94501-1091

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action that the abovecaptioned action has been settled pursuant to a settlement agreement and release of claims signed 

by the parties and their counsel. 

Accordingly, the parties through their designated counsel hereby give notice to the Court 

that THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). 

Dated: February 4, 2010

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

By: //s//

 NICOLE M. PHILLIPS

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: February 4, 2010

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC

By: //s//

JAMIE M. ERRECART 

Attorneys for Defendant

120669/560139

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:09-cv-02274-SC Document 28 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 291.400 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* HUD seeks to assist individuals and families who are homeless by providing them with transitional housing and appropriate supportive services with the goal of helping them move to independent living. Therefore, HUD will make available, to applicants approved by HUD, certain HUD-acquired single family properties for use by the homeless.
( b ) *Applicant preapproval.* Before a field office may notify an applicant of eligible properties, the applicant must be preapproved by HUD, according to procedures available from the field office.
( c ) *Property available for lease with option to purchase.* HUD will make available up to 10 percent of its total inventory of properties, before or after they are listed for sale to the public.
( d ) *Property available under a McKinney Act Supportive Housing program lease-option agreement.* Eligible properties will be available under a lease-option to purchase agreement to Supportive Housing program applicants for acquisition grants under 24 CFR part 583.
( e ) *Properties available for sale.* Eligible properties will be available for competitive sale or direct sale for fair market value, less a discount determined appropriate by the Secretary but not less than 10 percent.
( f ) *Concentration of properties.* To the extent practicable and possible, HUD will avoid excessive concentration in a single neighborhood of properties leased or sold under this subpart.
( g ) *Failure to comply with requirements.* Failure to comply with this subpart, or a lease issued under this subpart, may result in termination from the program.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 2502-0412) [61 FR 55714, Oct. 28, 1996]
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

PATRICK GILTON

NO. 2023 KW 1190

FEBRUARY 16, 2024

In Re: Patrick Gilton, applying for supervisory writs, 17th

Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche, No. 

612067. 

BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Appeals are

constitutionally guaranteed. See La. Const. art. V, § 5 and § 

10. Appeals are favored in the law and should not be dismissed

on a mere technicality. See Williams v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1

of Tangipahoa Parish, 2018- 1386 ( La. 12/ 17/ 18), 258 So. 3d 584, 

585 ( per curiam) . Furthermore, a defendant' s failure to specify

which rulings he desires to reserve for appeal may limit the

scope of appellate review but should not preclude review

altogether. See State v. Becnel, 2020- 0587 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 

4/ 16/ 21) , 323 So. 3d 408, 411. See also State v. Joseph, 2003- 

315 ( La. 5/ 16/ 03) , 847 So. 2d 1196 ( per curiam) . Accordingly, 

the writ application is granted, in part, for the purpose of

transferring to the district court for consideration as a

request to reinstate relator' s right to appeal. The district

court is ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine if

relator is entitled to an out -of -time appeal under Roe v. 

Flores -Ortega, 528 U. S. 470, 120 S. Ct. 1029, 1035, 145 L. Ed. 2d

985 ( 2000) and State v. Counterman, 475 So. 2d 336, 339 ( La. 

1985) and to appoint counsel for the hearing if relator is

indigent. See La. Code Crim. P. art. 930. 7. In all other

respects, the writ application is denied. 

JEW

EW

TPS
§ 576.402 Terminating assistance. ( a ) *In general.* If a program participant violates program requirements, the recipient or subrecipient may terminate the assistance in accordance with a formal process established by the recipient or subrecipient that recognizes the rights of individuals affected. The recipient or subrecipient must exercise judgment and examine all extenuating circumstances in determining when violations warrant termination so that a program participant's assistance is terminated only in the most severe cases.
( b ) *Program participants receiving rental assistance or housing relocation and stabilization services.* To terminate rental assistance or housing relocation and stabilization services to a program participant, the required formal process, at a minimum, must consist of: ( 1 ) Written notice to the program participant containing a clear statement of the reasons for termination;
( 2 ) A review of the decision, in which the program participant is given the opportunity to present written or oral objections before a person other than the person (or a subordinate of that person) who made or approved the termination decision; and
( 3 ) Prompt written notice of the final decision to the program participant.
( c ) *Ability to provide further assistance.* Termination under this section does not bar the recipient or subrecipient from providing further assistance at a later date to the same family or individual.
### [§§1337, 1338. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(25)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–585]

Section 1337, Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1271, related to publications authorized to be printed by the Commissioner of Patents.

Section 1338, Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1272, related to limitations and conditions concerning printing and lithographing by the Patent Office.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as an Effective Date of 1999 Amendment note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.
### §1109. Effectuation of cost reductions

Any cost reductions resulting from the provisions of or the amendments made by this subtitle shall not be used to limit the maximum level of any rate charged by Conrail for the provision of rail service, to limit the amount of any increase in any such rate (including rates maintained jointly by Conrail and other rail carriers), or to limit a surcharge or cancellation otherwise lawful under chapter 107 1 of title 49.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1159, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle E (§§1131–1169) of title XI of Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 643, known as the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.

Chapter 107 of title 49, referred to in text, was omitted and a new chapter 107 enacted in the general amendment of subtitle IV of Title 49, Transportation, by Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 804, 809.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008,
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May 15,
2008












/s/H. Dean
      Cubley
              H.
      Dean Cubley
              Chief
      Executive Officer
rnfcs1ex10-04.htm










Exhibit 10.4


 



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT












This amendment to the Employee Agreement dated December 27, 2007 is for the purpose of amending Section 3, (e), Compensation.  Due to extraordinary financial circumstances with the company caused by poor market conditions and bad economical conditions, I agree to wave RFC’s requirement for payment of three months salary in the event the RFC Board of Directors terminates my employment from the company.







I further agree to a reduced monthly salary of $5,000 from $10,000 effective November 1, 2009.  If in the opinion of RFC's Board of Directors RFC should obtain a reasonable Biodiesel or Glycerin Purchase Agreement that result in the ability of the company to reverse the extraordinary financial circumstances that now exist, and this employment agreement is not previously terminated by the company, RFC will increase the salary amount to the original level and reimburse me for the differences between the reduced amounts in the original amount for the time period this amendment is affective, and will do so as soon as management and the board of Directors, determine it is able to do so.







If after December 31, 2010 the Board of directors should choose to terminate the Employment Agreement Dated December 27, 2007 it is agreed between the parties that there is no further obligation by the company under the agreement or any of its subsequent amendments including this one.  Further, the parties agree to mutually release and hold harmless each other including RFC, its board of directors, officers, shareholders, employees, affiliates and myself from any and all damages or losses caused by the termination of the Employment Agreement or its subsequent amendments.







It is my intention to support the RFC with this action in an effort to retain my full employment and participate in the efforts reverse the extraordinary financial circumstances that now exist.







Signed:













"/s/ Richard Henderson"


 




Richard Henderson President
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0101 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-042-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
### **CHAPTER 18—MILWAUKEE RAILROAD RESTRUCTURING**

Sec.
901.
Congressional findings.
902.
Definitions.
903.
Sales and transfers.
904.
Court approved abandonments and sales.
905.
Employee or employee-shipper ownership plan.
906.
Guarantee of trustee certificates.
907.
Railroad hiring.
908.
Employee protection agreements.
909.
Supplementary unemployment insurance.
910.
Repealed.
911.
New career training assistance.
912.
Election.
913.
Authorization of appropriations.
914.
Obligation guarantees.
915.
Court approved abandonment and sales in pending cases.
916.
Repealed.
917.
Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act.
918.
Authority of Railroad Retirement Board.
919.
Publications and reports.
920.
Continuation of service.
921.
Office of Rail Public Counsel.
922.
Employee stock ownership plan for surviving portion of Milwaukee Railroad.
#### Theo. Nemoyer, appellee, v. Hotel La Salle Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,706.

Suit for damages for personal injuries by being struck by a taxicab. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis S. Wilson^ Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

*661W. Tudor ApMadoe, for appellant. James Pereival Pio, for appellee.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 32.2

GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST    CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY  RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
J. Patrick O'Grady, acting in the capacity of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GMH Communities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the "Company"),
hereby certify that, to my knowledge:



*
* *

|/s/J. PATRICK O'GRADYJ. Patrick O'Grady
Executive Vice President and
    Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 

Date:
March 28, 2008

---



QuickLinks