alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
 AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Notice of issuance of permits for endangered species and/or marine mammals.
 SUMMARY: The following permits were issued.
 ADDRESSES: Documents and other information submitted with these applications are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written request for a copy of such documents to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203; fax 703/358-2281.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Division of Management Authority, telephone 703/358-2104.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on the dates below, as authorized by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, 
                    *et seq.*), and/or the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361, 
                    *et seq.*), the Fish and Wildlife Service issued the requested permits subject to certain conditions set forth therein. For each permit for an endangered species, the Service found that (1) the application was filed in good faith, (2) the granted permit would not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species, and (3) the granted permit would be consistent with the purposes and policy set forth in Section 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Endangered Species
Permit number
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                              
                             notice
Permit issuance date078965
Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo
69 FR 42764; July 16, 2004
October 20, 2004.079034
Wildlife Conservation Society
68 FR 70521; December 18, 2003
October 20, 2004.080013
Cleveland Metroparks Zoo
68 FR 70521; December 18, 2003
October 20, 2004.
 Endangered Marine Mammals and Marine Mammals
Permit number
Applicant
Receipt of application 
                            **Federal Register**
                              
                             notice
Permit issuance date090925
Clarence T. Clem
69 FR 51702; August 20, 2004
October 19, 2004.091922
Patrick J. Carroll
69 FR 54149; September 7, 2004
October 26, 2004.
 Dated: October 29, 2004. Michael L. Carpenter, Senior Permit Biologist, Branch of Permits, Division of Management Authority.


[FR Doc. 04-28224 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.506 General provisions. ( a ) *Restrictions on assistance.* Financial assistance under a Section 214 covered program is restricted to: ( 1 ) *Citizens;* or
( 2 ) *Noncitizens* who have eligible immigration status under one of the categories set forth in Section 214 (see 42 U.S.C. 1436a(a)).
( b ) *Family eligibility for assistance.* ( 1 ) A family shall not be eligible for assistance unless every member of the family residing in the unit is determined to have eligible status, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, or unless the family meets the conditions set forth in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) Despite the ineligibility of one or more family members, a mixed family may be eligible for one of the three types of assistance provided in §§ 5.516 and 5.518. A family without any eligible members and receiving assistance on June 19, 1995 may be eligible for temporary deferral of termination of assistance as provided in §§ 5.516 and 5.518.
( c ) *Preferences.* Citizens of the Republic of Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau who are eligible for assistance under paragraph (a)(2) of this section are entitled to receive local preferences for housing assistance, except that, within Guam, such citizens who have such local preference will not be entitled to housing assistance in preference to any United States citizen or national resident therein who is otherwise eligible for such assistance.
[61 FR 5202, Feb. 9, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 65273, Oct. 23, 2002]
§ 214.309 Reapproval and disapproval based on performance review. Based on the performance review, HUD may determine whether to renew the approval unconditionally or conditionally, temporarily change status to inactive, or terminate approval or participation of the agency. ( a ) *Unconditional Reapproval.* If the agency is in full compliance with the performance criteria of this part, HUD may reapprove the agency unconditionally for up to 3 years.
( b ) *Conditional Reapproval.* If the agency fails to meet the performance criteria, but the failure does not seriously impair the agency's counseling capability as required in this part, HUD may extend the agency's approval or participation for up to 120 calendar days.
( c ) *Inactive status.* HUD may temporarily change an agency's status to inactive, as provided in § 214.200.
( d ) *Follow-up Review.* HUD may conduct a follow-up review to determine if the deficiencies have been corrected.
( e ) *Termination of HUD Approval.* When HUD determines that the agency's program deficiencies seriously impair the agency's ability to comply with this part, HUD may terminate approval or participation of the agency immediately.
( f ) *Appeal.* If HUD does not reinstate the approval, or terminates participation, the agency may file an appeal, as prescribed under § 214.205.
#### SHUBERT v. LINCOLN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 23, 1905.)

Joint Contract—Sufficiency of Evidence.

Evidence that defendant had a beneficial interest in plaintiff’s work and materials, and that he knowingly accepted the same, is sufficient to render him liable on the contract made by his codefendant with plaintiff, whether defendants were partners or not

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Twelfth District.

Action by Herman T. Shubert against Samuel S. Lincoln and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Argued before SCOTT, O’GORMAN, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Charles La Rue, for appellants.

Peter Schmuck, for respondent.

BLANCHARD, J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover the value of work performed and for materials furnished to the defendants by him at their request. The allegations of the complaint charged the defendants with a joint and several liability, and the evidence that'they were copartners was properly received as tending to show such liability. There is sufficient evidence in the case outside of that relating to the partnership to establish the facts that the appellant had a beneficial interest in the plaintiff’s work and materials, and that he knowingly, accepted the benefits thereof, thereby ratifying the contract made by the defendant Losee with the plaintiff.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76693-76694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 
21, 2005.
    Title, Forms, and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition 
Regulation Supplement (DFARS), Appendix F, Material Inspection and 
Receiving Report; DD Form 250, DD Form 250c, DD Form 250-1; OMB Control 
Number 0704-0248.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 34,180.
    Responses Per Respondent: 228 (average).
    Annual Responses: 7,800,000.
    Average Burden Per Response: 3 minutes (average).
    Annual Burden Hours: 344,500.
    Needs and Uses: Collection of this information is necessary to 
process the shipping and receipt of materials and payment to 
contractors under DoD contracts.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; not-for-profit 
institutions; Federal government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Lewis Oleinick.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed

[[Page 76694]]

information collection should be sent to Mr. Oleinick at the Office of 
Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings, WHS/ESCD/Information Management 
Division, 1225 South Clark Street, Suite 504, Arlington, VA 22202-4326.

    Dated: December 15, 2004.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-27965 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.206 Disagreement with IPIA or DAPIA. Whenever a manufacturer disagrees with a finding by a DAPIA or an IPIA acting in accordance with subpart H of this part, the manufacturer may request a Formal or Informal Presentation of Views as provided in § 3282.152. The manufacturer shall not, however, produce manufactured homes pursuant to designs which have not been approved by a DAPIA or produce manufactured homes which the relevant IPIA believes not to conform to the standards unless and until: ( a ) The Secretary determines that the manufacturer is correct in believing the design of the manufactured home conforms to the standards; or
( b ) Extraordinary interim relief is granted under § 3282.154; or
( c ) The DAPIA or IPIA otherwise resolves the disagreement.
[41 FR 19852, May 13, 1976, as amended at 51 FR 34468, Sept. 29, 1986; 61 FR 10860, Mar. 15, 1996]
#### William J. Shanahan, as Guardian ad Litem of Paul Shanahan, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. St. James Roman Catholic Church, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Albany County which awarded damages of $4,500 to the infant plaintiff and $1,255.95 to his father. The infant plaintiff was injured while playing “king of the mountain” on a pile of snow next to appellant’s school building when he was pushed off the top of the pile and landed in a sitting position on a stalk which pierced his body. The pile of snow, which had been in existence about two weeks before the accident, was about two feet high and three feet across and the stalk was one of several which were six to eight inches high and which were part of some bushes located along the school building about three or four feet from the pile of snow. The same game had been played on the snow for about ten days. The infant plaintiff, who attended the fifth grade, returned home each day for his lunch. Classes were recessed at 11:30 a.m., the children assembled in line at 12:35 p.m. and classes reconvened at 12:40 p.m. The Sister in charge of the school testified *585that one of the rules which she explained to the children several times each year was that they could not return to school after lunch until 12:30 p.m. and they were then to take their place near the door. The accident here occurred at about 12:20 p.m. and it is admitted that there was no one supervising the area where it happened on that or any other lunch hour. The court below charged the jury that to find for the plaintiffs it was necessary to find that a dangerous condition existed of which the appellant should have known and further that there was a lack of supervision. The jury returned a verdict of $4,500 for the infant plaintiff and $1,255.95 for his father. The court denied appellant’s motions for a dismissal of the complaint and for a directed verdict. The injury here was not sustained during school hours but rather during a period when classes were recessed for lunch and at a time when pupils such as the infant plaintiff who went home for lunch were not supposed to have returned to the school grounds. The appellant did not undertake the supervision of such pupils during their lunch hour and there is a lack of evidence to support a finding of a breach of a duty of supervision. *(Pollard*v. *Board of Educ.,*280 App. Div. 1033, affd. 309 N. Y. 841.) It was also not demonstrated that the appellant had any notice that the pupils were not complying with the rule covering their return to school. Further, the plaintiffs here failed to establish the existence of a dangerous condition. The small pile of snow in the school yard together with the bushes and stalks along the building several feet away did not, in our view, constitute such a condition. Judgment reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Hutchison
Telecommunications International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2005 (the Report), we, Dennis Pok Man Lui and Tim L. Pennington, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, promulgated under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 26, 2006



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Dennis Pok Man Lui
|Name:                  |  | Dennis Pok Man Lui     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      
|/s/ Tim L. Pennington 
|Name:                  |  | Tim L. Pennington      
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: 6-12-12 Meeting with AF&PA Member Companies with the Administrator

FROM: Marc Thomas

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

On June 12, 2012, the CEOs of several member companies of the American Forest & Paper 

Association (AF&PA) met with EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson to discuss their issues and 

concerns with proposed revisions to the Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) and the 

Boiler MACT reconsideration.

During that meeting, industry members expressed concerns with the compliance time associated 

with the Boiler MACT, the achievability of the Boiler MACT standards, and the waste/nonwaste status regarding several non-hazardous secondary materials under the NHSM rule. EPA 

asked clarifying questions. A list of invitees is provided below. Documents provided during this 

meeting are attached. 

List of Invitees:

Lisa P. Jackson, EPA Administrator

Mathy Stanislaus, EPA, OSWER Assistant Administrator

Gina McCarthy, EPA, OAR Assistant Administrator

Arvin Ganesan, EPA, OCIR Associate Administrator

Alexander Toeldte, Chairman of the Board and CEO of Boise, Inc.

David Scheible, First Vice Chairman of the Board and CEO of Graphic Packaging, Inc.

John D. Williams, Second Vice-Chairman of the Board CEO of Domtar 

John Faraci, Chairman and CEO, International Paper

Mark Kowlzan, CEO Packaging Corporation of America

John Crowe, CEO Buckeye Technologies

Donna Harman, President, American Forest & Paper Association

Paul Noe, Vice-President for Regulatory Affairs, American Forest & Paper Association
<PAGE>
                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Famous Dave's of
America, Inc. does hereby certify that:
     a. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Dave's of America, Inc for
the quarter ended September 29, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
and
     b. information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Famous Dave's of
America, Inc.


Dated: November 13, 2002                   /s/ Martin J. O'Dowd
                                           --------------------
                                           Martin J. O'Dowd
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 13, 2002                   /s/ Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                           -----------------------
                                           Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
#### HUYLER, Appellant, v. DOLSON et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by John J. Huyler, as executor, etc., against Robert H. Dolson and another, as executors, etc. No opinion. Motion denied.
§ 3.435 Employment assistance to students. ( a ) *Assistance by recipient in making available outside employment.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making employment available to any of its students: ( 1 ) Shall assure itself that such employment is made available without discrimination on the basis of sex; and
( 2 ) Shall not render such services to any agency, organization, or person that discriminates on the basis of sex in its employment practices.
( b ) *Employment of students by recipients.* A recipient that employs any of its students shall not do so in a manner that violates §§ 3.500 through 3.550.
### §318. Transfer of surplus property; acceptance of voluntary services

(a) The Director of the Government Publishing Office may—

(1) transfer or donate surplus Government publications and condemned Government Publishing Office machinery, material, equipment, and supplies to—

(A) other Federal entities;

(B) any organization described under section 501(c)(3) or (4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from taxation under 501(a) of such Code; or

(C) State or local governments; and

(2) accept voluntary and uncompensated services, notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31.

(b) Individuals providing voluntary and uncompensated services under subsection (a)(2) shall not be considered Federal employees, except for purposes of chapter 81 of title 5 (relating to compensation for work injuries) and chapter 171 of title 28 (relating to tort claims).

(Added Pub. L. 108–83, title I, §1302(a), Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1033; amended Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), (c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(c)(1), substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in subsec. (a)(1) on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.
§ 3285.301 General. ( a ) Foundations for manufactured home installations must be designed and constructed in accordance with this subpart and must be based on site conditions, home design features, and the loads the home was designed to withstand, as shown on the home's data plate.
( b ) Foundation systems that are not pier and footing type configurations may be used when verified by engineering data and designed in accordance with § 3285.301(d), consistent with the design loads of the MHCSS. Pier and footing specifications that are different than those provided in this subpart, such as block size, metal piers, section width, loads, and spacing, may be used when verified by engineering data that comply with §§ 3285.301(c) and (d) and are capable of resisting all design loads of the MHCSS.
( c ) All foundation details, plans, and test data must be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect, and must not take the home out of compliance with the MHCSS. (See 3285.2)
( d ) Alternative foundation systems or designs are permitted in accordance with either of the following: ( 1 ) Systems or designs must be manufactured and installed in accordance with their listings by a nationally recognized testing agency, based on a nationally recognized testing protocol; or
( 2 ) System designs must be prepared by a professional engineer or a registered architect or tested and certified by a professional engineer or registered architect in accordance with acceptable engineering practice and must be manufactured and installed so as not to take the home out of compliance with the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards (part 3280 of this chapter).
RACHEL DEJESUS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5394

Opinion filed June 6, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

Charlie Cofer , Public Defender, Elizabeth H. Webb, Assistant Public Defender,

Jacksonville , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jason W. Rodriguez, Tallahassee , for

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED on the me rits.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
### §1911. Free use of Government publications in depositories; disposal of unwanted publications

Depository libraries shall make Government publications available for the free use of the general public, and may dispose of them after retention for five years under section 1912 of this title, if the depository library is served by a regional depository library. Depository libraries not served by a regional depository library, or that are regional depository libraries themselves, shall retain Government publications permanently in either printed form or in microfacsimile form, except superseded publications or those issued later in bound form which may be discarded as authorized by the Superintendent of Documents.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1286.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §92 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §74, 28 Stat. 620; June 20, 1936, ch. 630, title VII, §11, 49 Stat. 1552; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–579, §8, 76 Stat. 355).

The first sentence of section 92, is classified to section 1119; the remainder comprises this section of the revision.