alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2304. Compensation of members; availability of trust funds for expenses of the Board

Compensation may not be paid to the members of the Board for their services as members. Costs incurred by the Board in carrying out its duties under this chapter, including the obligations necessarily incurred by the members of the Board in the performance of their duties and the compensation of persons employed by the Board, shall be paid by the Archivist of the United States from trust funds available to the Board for this purpose. The Board, by resolution, may authorize the transfer of funds (including the principal or interest of a gift or bequest) to the National Archives and Records Administration to be expended on an archival or records activity approved by the Board or to accomplish the purpose of a gift or bequest.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1292; Pub. L. 98–497, title II, §202(a), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2293.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §300ii (July 9, 1941, ch. 284, §9, 55 Stat. 582).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Compensation may not be paid to the members of the Board for their services as members. Costs incurred by the Board in carrying out its duties under this chapter, including the expenditures necessarily made by the members of the Board in the performance of their duties and the compensation of persons employed by the Board, shall be paid out of income from trust funds available to the Board for the purpose. Unless otherwise restricted by the instrument of gift or bequest, the Board, by resolution, may authorize the Chairman to use for these purposes, or for any other purpose for which funds may be expended under this chapter, the principal of a gift or bequest accepted under this chapter."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN M PERRY, SANDRA B STIER,

PAUL T KATAMI and JEFFREY J

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his

official capacity as governor of

California; EDMUND G BROWN JR, in

his official capacity as attorney

general of California; MARK B

HORTON, in his official capacity

as director of the California

Department of Public Health and

state registrar of vital

statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her

official capacity as deputy

director of health information &

strategic planning for the

California Department of Public

Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his

official capacity as clerkrecorder of the County of

Alameda; and DEAN C LOGAN, in his

official capacity as registrarrecorder/county clerk for the

County of Los Angeles, 

Defendants,

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, GAIL J

KNIGHT, MARTIN F GUTIERREZ,

HAKSHING WILLIAM TAM, MARK A

JANSSON and PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM –

YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF

CALIOFORNIA RENEWAL, as official

proponents of Proposition 8,

Defendant-Intervenors. /

No C 09-2292 VRW

ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 413 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

During the first day of trial, the court asked counsel

for the Attorney General to explain how Proposition 8 was placed on

the 2008 ballot despite the Attorney General’s position that

Proposition 8 is unconstitutional. Counsel for the Attorney

General agreed to provide the court a memorandum in response.

The Attorney General is DIRECTED to file a memorandum in

response to the court’s question not later than January 14, 2010 at

5 PM. Any party wishing to respond to the Attorney General’s

memorandum shall do so not later than January 19, 2010 at 5 PM.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02292-JW Document 413 Filed 01/12/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Appellant,

vs

TERRI GONZALES, Warden

Appellee.

LARRY REDIC

The individual named above as appellant, having testified under oath or having

otherwise satisfied this court that he or she (1) is financially unable to employ counsel and (2)

does not wish to waive counsel, and, because the interests of justice so require, the Court finds

that the appellant is indigent, therefore;

IT IS ORDERED that the attorney whose name and contact information are

listed below is appointed to represent the above appellant.

)

) U.S.C.A. No.:

) U.S.D.C. No.:

)

) ORDER RE: CJA APPOINTMENT

) OF AND AUTHORITY TO PAY

) COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL

) ON APPEAL

)

(415) 425-2693

Gene Vorobyov

450 Taraval St., # 112

San Francisco, CA 94116

November 17, 2015

Date of Order Nunc Pro Tunc Date

United States District CourtNorthern District of California

CV-08-05010-RS

15-15177

Appointing Judge: Hon. Judge Seeborg

gene.law@gmail.com

11/17/15

Case 3:08-cv-05010-RS Document 98 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 1
### §2705. Compensation and travel expenses

A member of the Committee may not be paid compensation for service performed as a member of the Committee. However, members of the Committee shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of service for the Committee.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title IV, §1(d)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1418.)
### §491. Authority of Secretary to operate works

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and directed to use the reclamation fund for the operation and maintenance of all reservoirs and irrigation works constructed under the provisions of this Act.

(June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, §6, 32 Stat. 389.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of part of section 6 of act June 17, 1902. Remainder of such section 6 is classified to section 498 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Section as Unaffected by Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.54 Project completion funding. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the mortgagor shall deposit with the mortgagee cash deemed by the Commissioner to be sufficient, when added to the proceeds of the insured mortgage, to assure completion of the project and to pay the initial service charge, carrying charges, and legal and organizational expenses incident to the construction of the project. The Commissioner may accept a lesser cash deposit or an alternative to a cash deposit in accordance with terms and conditions established by the Commissioner, where the required funding is to be provided by a grant or loan from a Federal, State, or local government agency or instrumentality.
( b ) An agreement acceptable to the Commissioner shall require that funds provided by the mortgagor under requirements of this section must be disbursed in full for project work, material, and incidental charges and expenses before disbursement of any mortgage proceeds, except:
( c ) Low-income housing tax credit syndication proceeds, historic tax-credit syndication proceeds, New Markets Tax Credits proceeds, or funds provided by a grant or loan from a Federal, State, or local governmental agency or instrumentality under requirements of this section need not be fully disbursed before the disbursement of mortgage proceeds, where approved by the Commissioner in accordance with terms, conditions, and standards established by the Commissioner;
( d ) In the case of a mortgage insured under any provision of this title executed in connection with the purchase, construction, rehabilitation, or refinancing of a multifamily tax credit project, the Commissioner may not require: ( 1 ) The escrowing of equity provided by Low-Income Housing Tax Credits for the project pursuant to Title 26, section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
( 2 ) The escrowing of equity provided by historic rehabilitation tax credits, New Markets Tax Credits, or any other form of security, such as a letter of credit.
[75 FR 51915, Aug. 23, 2010]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3028 

To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)–6- 

(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)–1,3,5-tri zin-2-yl]-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]- 

3-methylbenzoate and application adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl 2-[[[[[4- 

(dimethylamino)–6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)–1,3,5-tri zin-2- 

yl]-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and 

application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3028 IH 

1 SECTION 1. METHYL 2-[[[[[4-(DIMETHYLAMINO)–6-(2,2,2- 

2 TRIFLUOROETHOXY)–1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-YL]- 

3 AMINO]CARBONYL]AMINO]SULFONYL]-3- 

4 METHYLBENZOATE AND APPLICATION ADJU5 VANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.01 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)–6-(2,2,2- 

9 trifluoroethoxy)–1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]- 

10 amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and ap11 plication adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in 

12 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Josue Valentin, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for reargument denied. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, J J., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.611 Compliance with this subpart.

If the manufacturer and IPIA, as applicable, complies with the requirements of this section and the home complies with the construction and safety standards for those aspects of construction covered by the DAPIA approval, then HUD will consider a manufacturer or retailer that has permitted a manufactured home approved for on-site completion under this section to be sold, leased, offered for sale or lease, introduced, delivered, or imported to be in compliance with the certification requirements of the Act and the applicable implementing regulations in this part 3282 for those aspects of construction covered by the approval.
### §1342. Prior claims as unaffected

Nothing herein contained shall affect such rights, if any, as may have been acquired under any law of the United States by any person in lands subject to this subchapter and such rights, if any, shall be governed by the law in effect at the time they may have been acquired: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained is intended or shall be construed as a finding, interpretation, or construction by the Congress that the law under which such rights may be claimed in fact applies to the lands subject to this subchapter or authorizes or compels the granting of such rights in such lands, and that the determination of the applicability or effect of such law shall be unaffected by anything herein contained.

(Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 345, §14, 67 Stat. 470.)
### §620e. Cost allocations; Indian lands; report to Congress

Upon completion of each unit, participating project or separable feature thereof, the Secretary shall allocate the total costs (excluding any expenditures authorized by section 620g of this title) of constructing said unit, project or feature to power, irrigation, municipal water supply, flood control, navigation, or any other purposes authorized under reclamation law. Allocations of construction, operation and maintenance costs to authorized nonreimbursable purposes shall be nonreturnable under the provisions of this chapter. In the event that the Navajo participating project is authorized, the costs allocated to irrigation of Indian-owned tribal or restricted lands within, under, or served by such project, and beyond the capability of such lands to repay, shall be determined, and, in recognition of the fact that assistance to the Navajo Indians is the responsibility of the entire nation, such costs shall be nonreimbursable. On January 1 of each year the Secretary shall report to the Congress for the previous fiscal year, beginning with the fiscal year 1957, upon the status of the revenues from, and the cost of, constructing, operating, and maintaining the Colorado River storage project and the participating projects. The Secretary's report shall be prepared to reflect accurately the Federal investment allocated at that time to power, to irrigation, and to other purposes, the progress of return and repayment thereon, and the estimated rate of progress, year by year, in accomplishing full repayment.

(Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, §6, 70 Stat. 109.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions of law requiring submittal to Congress of any annual, semiannual, or other regular periodic report listed in House Document No. 103–7 (in which a report required under this section is listed as the 11th item on page 114), see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, and section 1(a)(4) [div. A, §1402(1)] of Pub. L. 106–554, set out as notes under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
§ 203.679 Continued occupancy after conveyance. ( a ) Occupancy of HUD-acquired property is temporary in all cases and is subject to termination when necessary to facilitate preparing the property for sale and completing the sale.
( b ) HUD will notify the occupant to vacate the property and, if necessary, will take appropriate eviction action in any of the following situations: ( 1 ) Failure of the occupant to execute the lease required by § 203.674 (a)(2) and (b)(2), or failure to pay the rental amount required, including the initial payment at the time of execution of the lease, or to comply with the terms of the lease;
( 2 ) Failure of the occupant to allow access to the property upon request in accordance with § 203.674 (a)(4) and (b)(5);
( 3 ) Necessity to prepare the property for sale; or
( 4 ) Assignment of the property by the Secretary to a different use or program.
[53 FR 876, Jan. 14, 1988, and 53 FR 8626, Mar. 16, 1988; 61 FR 36266, July 9, 1996]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP TEMPLE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GUARDSMARK, LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02124 SI

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER

DEPOSITION TESTIMONY

(Docket No. 75)

Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel additional deposition testimony from Guardsmark’s

Regional Manager, Mike East. Plaintiff deposed Mr. East on May 21, 2010. During the deposition,

counsel attempted to question Mr. East regarding whether Guardsmark security guards are authorized

and permitted to take rest breaks. The gist of the line of questioning now at issue is as follows.

Plaintiff’s counsel asked Mr. East whether Guardsmark employees are permitted to take rest breaks and

“ignore the client work site for 10 minutes twice a day.” Defense counsel objected to the question. Mr.

East answered that the guards “can take a 10-minute off-duty break,” but stated, “[i]gnore, I don’t know

what that’s about.” Plaintiff’s counsel then repeated the same “ignore” question several more times, and

received the same answer from Mr. East. After this exchange played out for several more minutes with

intermittent objections from the defense, defense counsel finally stated, “The question is defective,

intentionally so, and ambiguous and compound. . . . And it has been asked and answered several times.”

Plaintiff’s counsel responded, “I’m going to get a court order to get an answer to this question.”

In moving to compel Mr. East to answer the disputed question, plaintiff asserts that Mr. East was

“evading” the line of questioning. Plaintiff now explains that he was seeking an answer to the question

of whether security guards are “in fact relieved of all work duties during breaks.” Plaintiff fails to

Case 3:09-cv-02124-SI Document 82 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

explain, however, why counsel did not reword his question to Mr. East, or even explain what he meant

by the vague term “ignore,” once it was clear that Mr. East did not understand the question. If counsel

wanted an answer to the question whether security guards are relieved of work duties during their

breaks, counsel should have phrased the question this way. Plaintiff is not entitled to compel any further

deposition testimony from Mr. East, and the motion to compel is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July27, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02124-SI Document 82 Filed 07/27/10 Page 2 of 2
### §3004. National goal for renewable energy production on Federal land

#### (a) In general

Not later than September 1, 2022, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture and other heads of relevant Federal agencies, establish national goals for renewable energy production on Federal land.

#### (b) Minimum production goal

The Secretary shall seek to issue permits that, in total, authorize production of not less than 25 gigawatts of electricity from wind, solar, and geothermal energy projects by not later than 2025, through management of public lands and administration of Federal laws.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3104, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2516.)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 256

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 

date for certain nonviolent offenders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release date for certain nonviolent offenders, and 

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Prison Bureau 

5 Nonviolent Offender Relief Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OF7 FENDERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3624 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 256 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘at the early 

2 release date provided in subsection (g), if applicable, 

3 or otherwise’’ after ‘‘A prisoner shall be released by 

4 the Bureau of Prisons’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(g) EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT

7 OFFENDERS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, the Bureau of Prisons, pursuant to a good time pol9 icy, shall release from confinement a prisoner who has 

10 served one half or more of his term of imprisonment (in11 cluding any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) 

12 if that prisoner—

13 ‘‘(1) has attained the age of 45 years; 

14 ‘‘(2) has never been convicted of a crime of vio15 lence; and 

16 ‘‘(3) has not engaged in any violation, involving 

17 violent conduct, of institutional disciplinary regula18 tions.’’.

Æ
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANA AURELIA FARRER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

COUNTY OF MARIN and MARIN COUNTY

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN

SERVICES,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00900 JSW

ORDER REQUIRING JOINT

STATUS REPORT

On July 17, 2009, this Court received the Certification of ADR Session in this case, in

which the ENE evaluator advised the Court that this matter had settled. There has been no

further action in the case, and the parties have not filed a dismissal. Accordingly, the parties are

HEREBY ORDERED to submit a joint status report regarding the status of settlement and when

they expect a dismissal to be filed. The joint status report, or a dismissal, shall be due on or

before February 12, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 29, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00900-JSW Document 35 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.2


  Exhibit 10.2

  AMENDMENT TO THE

  ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

  2018 INCENTIVE PLAN

    

  WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and the stockholders of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) have previously adopted the Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. 2018 Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”);

    

  WHEREAS, capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan; 

   

  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”), as the Plan’s Administrator, may at any time and from time to time amend or terminate the Plan or any outstanding Award thereunder as may be permitted by law, provided that except as otherwise expressly permitted in the Plan, the Administrator may not, without the Participant’s consent, alter the terms of an Award so as to affect materially and adversely the Participant’s rights under such Award;

   

  WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the Plan, determinations of the Administrator made under the Plan will be conclusive and will bind all parties; and

    

  WHEREAS, the Committee has determined to amend the Plan in the manner set forth below.

    

  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

   

  1.The following sentence is hereby added at the end of Section 4(c) of the Plan:


   

  “Accelerated vesting on account of death, disability, or a Change in Control shall not be taken into account in applying the immediately preceding sentence.”

   

  2.Except as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


   

   

  [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

    

   

   

  

  Exhibit 10.2

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. 2018 Incentive Plan is executed for and on behalf of the Company, effective as of September 16, 2022.

   

  ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. 

   

   

  By:	   /s/ Adam R. Kokas       	

  Name:	Adam R. Kokas

  Title:	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary