alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
‘ 00” “00” - 00” -90° 18’ 90” -90" 12’ 00” -90° 06’ 00” -90" 00’ 00”
-91° 00" 00” -90°54’ 00” -90° 48’ 06” -90%42'00" -90* 36’ 00 -90* 30’ 00 90° 24’ 00 90° 18’ G0 oee ng’ ao”

2600’ 00”

|

0
| x
2

Ghi -WT

VUC2W Ul segr 031%?

VINGOUNVO “SNA «© NGLWdOdt

25°54’ 00”

25°54’ 00”

—
z
£
fa]

|
|
|
|
|
|

Gu

| 25° 48’ 00”

ANH

V

25% 48’ 00”

-)

N

2542/00" |

25942’ 00”

dO CICH NWId

c

uve.

VINHOSNMVO ‘BNIAHI ¢
ist

25° 36’ 00” |

25° 36’ 00”

O
a 3)
re)
No

HOS OH Nid

25°30’ 00" 3
-90° 00’ 00”

25° 30’ 00” +— , a ane 90° 24’ 00” ~ _ga8 18/00” -90° 12’ 00” -90° 06’ 00”
-91%00' 00” 90°54’ 00” -30 48’ 00” 90°42’ 00” -90° 36 00 -90% 30’ 00 ga" 24’ 00 18’ 00

meses MEXICO BASIN NE N255090W

SCALE 1:100,000

NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEY
Contours in corrected meters

t.M146 |

INIMWH

eSgiANN 9

|
|
|
|
if
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:17:05-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
EX-10.2


   

  Exhibit 10.2

   

  Exhibit A

  SUPPLEMENTAL RELEASE AGREEMENT

   

  By signing this Supplemental Release Agreement where indicated below, I acknowledge and agree that I am hereby extending, through and including the date I sign below, the application of all of my representations, obligations, acknowledgements, and other provisions reflected in the Separation Agreement and General Release of Claims, dated August 9, 2022 (the “Agreement”) that I entered into relating to my separation from employment with the Company (as defined in the Agreement), including but not limited to my full and binding release and waiver of all claims against the Company or any of the Released Parties (as defined in the Agreement), to the greatest extent permitted under applicable law. 

   

  I understand and agree that, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, I am only eligible to receive certain consideration payments described therein if I timely execute this Supplemental Release and otherwise satisfy all terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement. I further understand and acknowledge that the consideration given for this waiver and release is in addition to anything of value to which I was already entitled. 

   

  I agree that my signature below constitutes my certification that I have returned all documents and other items provided to me by the Company, developed or obtained by me in connection with my employment with the Company, or otherwise belonging to the Company, including, but not limited to, all passwords to any software or other programs or data that I used in performing services for the Company. 

   

  I understand that I am not to sign and return this Supplemental Release until my Separation Date (as defined in the Agreement), and no later than three (3) days after the Separation Date. I acknowledge that I have been afforded at least twenty-one (21) days to consider this Supplemental Release and I have seven (7) days after I sign this Supplemental Release to revoke it. In the event that I sign this Supplemental Release and return it to the Company in less than this 21-day period, I hereby acknowledge that I have freely and voluntarily chosen to waive the time period allotted for considering this Supplemental Release. This Supplemental Release will become effective on the eighth (8th) day after I sign this Supplemental Release, so long as I have not revoked it before that date I acknowledge and understand that revocation must be accomplished by a written notification to the Company that is received prior to the end of the revocation period. By signing below, I acknowledge that I have read and understand and agree to all the terms of the Agreement and this Supplemental Release, and intend to be bound thereby. 

   

  *NOT TO BE SIGNED UNTIL ON/AFTER THE SEPARATION DATE*

   

   

  1

  © 2021 All rights reserved | Confidential | For Syneos HealthTM use only

   

   

  

   

  		
	Dated: 10/12/2022
	Paul Colvin

 
/s/ Paul Colvin					

Address: [Redacted]
 
 



   

   

  2

  © 2021 All rights reserved | Confidential | For Syneos HealthTM use only
§ 570.613 Eligibility restrictions for certain resident aliens. ( a ) *Restriction.* Certain newly legalized aliens, as described in 24 CFR part 49, are not eligible to apply for benefits under covered activities funded by the programs listed in paragraph (e) of this section. “Benefits” under this section means financial assistance, public services, jobs and access to new or rehabilitated housing and other facilities made available under covered activities funded by programs listed in paragraph (e) of this section. “Benefits” do not include relocation services and payments to which displacees are entitled by law.
( b ) *Covered activities.* “Covered activities” under this section means activities meeting the requirements of § 570.208(a) that either: ( 1 ) Have income eligibility requirements limiting the benefits exclusively to low and moderate income persons; or
( 2 ) Are targeted geographically or otherwise to primarily benefit low and moderate income persons (excluding activities serving the public at large, such as sewers, roads, sidewalks, and parks), and that provide benefits to persons on the basis of an application.
( c ) *Limitation on coverage.* The restrictions under this section apply only to applicants for new benefits not being received by covered resident aliens as of the effective date of this section.
( d ) *Compliance.* Compliance can be accomplished by obtaining certification as provided in 24 CFR 49.20.
( e ) *Programs affected.* ( 1 ) The Community Development Block Grant program for small cities, administered under subpart F of part 570 of this title until closeout of the recipient's grant.
( 2 ) The Community Development Block Grant program for entitlement grants, administered under subpart D of part 570 of this title.
( 3 ) The Community Development Block Grant program for States, administered under subpart I of part 570 of this title until closeout of the unit of general local government's grant by the State.
( 4 ) The Urban Development Action Grants program, administered under subpart G of part 570 of this title until closeout of the recipient's grant.
[55 FR 18494, May 2, 1990]
### §163. Repeal of prior legislation; exception

Chapters 6 and 7 of this title, providing for mediation, conciliation, and arbitration, and all Acts and parts of Acts in conflict with the provisions of this chapter are repealed, except that the members, secretary, officers, employees, and agents of the Railroad Labor Board, in office on May 20, 1926, shall receive their salaries for a period of 30 days from such date, in the same manner as though this chapter had not been passed.

(May 20, 1926, ch. 347, §14, 44 Stat. 587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Chapters 6 and 7 of this title, referred to in text, were in the original references to the act of July 15, 1913, and title III of the Transportation Act, 1920, respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,955,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,745
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,275,852
<PP&E>                                       1,873,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                 869,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,716,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,137,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,727
<COMMON>                                         6,018
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,437,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,716,922
<SALES>                                        260,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               260,404
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,362,120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               473,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,022
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,575,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,575,321)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 35.600 Purpose and applicability.

The purpose of this subpart G is to establish procedures to eliminate as far as practicable lead-based paint hazards in a multifamily residential property for which HUD is the owner of the mortgage or the owner receives mortgage insurance, under a program administered by HUD.
### §422l. Application of this subchapter to Hawaii

This subchapter as heretofore and hereafter amended, shall apply to the State of Hawaii.

(Pub. L. 86–624, §31, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 421.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as a part of the Hawaii Omnibus Act, and not as a part of the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956 which comprises this subchapter.
### §§975, 975a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–468, title VI, §615(a)(1), Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2577

Section 975, acts Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §1, 38 Stat. 305; Apr. 10, 1926, ch. 114, 44 Stat. 239; Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 554, 69 Stat. 494; Nov. 1, 1978, Pub. L. 95–565, §4(a), 92 Stat. 2399; Oct. 10, 1980, Pub. L. 96–423, §15, 94 Stat. 1817, related to location, construction, and operation of Alaska Railroad and powers and duties of President in connection therewith, and security officers. Section was comprised of first and second paragraphs of section 1 of act Mar. 12, 1914. The first paragraph was included in the Act as originally enacted in 1914 and the second paragraph was added in 1980 by Pub. L. 96–423. Amendment of section 1 of act Mar. 12, 1914, by act Mar. 29, 1940, ch. 74, 54 Stat. 80, relating to Mount McKinley National Park, and providing for accommodations for visitors and residents, was set out as section 353a of Title 16, Conservation. Section was formerly classified to section 301 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Section 975a, act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §1, 38 Stat. 307, related to telegraph and telephone lines in Alaska. Section was comprised of original second paragraph of section 1 of act Mar. 12, 1914. Section was formerly classified to section 302 of Title 48.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on date of transfer of Alaska Railroad to State [Jan. 5, 1985], pursuant to section 1203 of Title 45, Railroads, see section 615(a) of Pub. L. 97–468.

#### Rental of Alaska Railroad Lands; Report to Congress

Pub. L. 95–611, §6, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3090, authorized the Secretary of Transportation to conduct an investigation and study to determine equitable rates to be charged for the rental of Alaska Railroad lands, required submission by the Secretary of a report on the results of such study to the Congress not later than one year after Nov. 8, 1978, and provided that, prior to 180 days after the receipt by Congress of such report, rental charges on lands rented by the Alaska Railroad were not to be increased by more than 100 per centum of the amount charged for such land on Jan. 1, 1977.

#### Appropriations

Act Mar. 12, 1914, ch. 37, §2, 38 Stat. 307, which provided that the cost of the work authorized by sections 975 to 975g should not exceed $35,000,000, and that in executing the authority granted by those sections the President should not expend nor obligate the United States to expend more than that sum, and also appropriated the sum of $1,000,000 to be used for carrying out the provisions of those sections, to continue available until expended, was repealed by section 615(a)(1) of Pub. L. 97–468.
Case 3:08-cv-03875-JCS Document 113 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-03875-JCS Document112 Filed03/08/10 Page1 of 2
Case3:08-cv-03875-JCS Document112 Filed03/08/10 Page2 of 2

Dated: March 9, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-03875-JCS Document 113 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Simon Bank et al., Respondents, v Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, City of New York, Article 1, et al., Appellants. John F. Carroll et al., Respondents, v Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, City of New York, Article 1, et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 2, 1975, denying defendants’ *955motion to vacate default judgments, is unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to vacate such default and default judgments, is granted, and the defendants are directed to serve their answers as well as papers in opposition to plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment within 30 days after service by appellants upon respondents of a copy of the order determining this appeal and thereafter any party may restore the motions to the Special Term calendar on eight days’ notice to the other parties. It is apparent that the Corporation Counsel’s office was somewhat careless in this matter. However, it is understandable, though wrong, that the Assistant Corporation Counsel may have believed that the stipulations of extension included extensions of time to make motions to dismiss without serving answers, and that such motions to dismiss would be accepted and considered in opposition to plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment based on the alleged defaults. While there were a number of defaults, none of them appear to have been of long duration. The worst that can be said about them is that the practice was sloppy. The case involves claims by approximately 100 police officers for increased pensions for life. Such a liability should not be imposed upon the city or the police pension funds because of the Assistant Corporation Counsel’s technical defaults which caused no prejudice to the plaintiffs. Concur—Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Fein and Sandler, JJ.
### §7255. Subpoena

For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this chapter, the Secretary, or his duly authorized agent or agents, shall have the same powers and authorities as the Federal Trade Commission under section 49 of title 15 with respect to all functions vested in, or transferred or delegated to, the Secretary or such agents by this chapter. For purposes of carrying out its responsibilities under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 [15 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.], the Commission shall have the same powers and authority as the Secretary has under this section.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §645, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 599; Pub. L. 95–621, title V, §508(a), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565, known as the Department of Energy Organization Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7101 of this title and Tables.

The Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–621, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3350, which is classified generally to chapter 60 (§3301 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3301 of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–621 inserted provision giving the Commission the same powers and authority as the Secretary under this section for purposes of carrying out its responsibilities under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978.
### §390h–12e. Watsonville Area Water Recycling Project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the City of Watsonville, California, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the Watsonville Area Water Recycling Project to reclaim and reuse water in the Pajaro Valley in Santa Cruz County, California.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation or maintenance of a project described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1619, as added Pub. L. 104–266, §2(a)(2), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3291.)
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION





The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 (the “Trust”) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”):





1.           The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.





2.           Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement.








By:
/s/ David J. KolibachukName:
David J. KolibachukTitle:
Vice PresidentDated:
March 23, 2015
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

ELIZABETH KARNAZES, 

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, et al., 

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-0767 MMC

ORDER APPROVING REQUEST FOR

DEFENDANT DEBORAH TITONE

NOT TO ATTEND THE MEDIATION

SESSION

Date: April 28, 2010

Mediator: Matthew Pavone

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for defendant Deborah Titone not to appear at

the April 28 mediation before Matthew Pavone is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

March 16, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00767-MMC Document 52 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Pauline S. Bresnick et al., Appellants, v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondent.

Final order, entered on or about October 5, 1959, reducing the assessments on the petitioners’ real property for the tax years 1956-57, 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
### §1113. Annual reports: exclusion of irrelevant matter

Executive officers, before transmitting their annual reports, shall carefully examine them and all accompanying documents, and exclude all matter, including engravings, maps, drawings, and illustrations, except such as they certify in their letters transmitting the reports are necessary and relate entirely to the transaction of the public business.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1263.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §219 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §94, 28 Stat. 623).

This section incorporates only the second clause of former section 219. The balance will be found in section 1102 of the revision.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Frank Piscitello.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted to the extent and on the terms and conditions contained, in the order of this court filed herein. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### ERIC E. HOHENTHAL ET AL. *v.*DAVID CORMIER

(AC 24987)

Dranginis, Bishop and DiPentima, Js.

Argued May 27

officially released June 28, 2005

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
### Two-dimensional direct-current resistivity survey to supplement borehole data in ground-water models of the former Blaine Naval Ammunition Depot, Hastings, Nebraska, September 2003

By: Wade H. KressLyndsay B. Ball**Andrew   Teeple**Michael J. Turco

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds172

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The former Blaine Naval Ammunition Depot located immediately southeast of Hastings, Nebraska, was an ammunition facility during World War II and the Korean Conflict. Waste-management practices during operation and decommissioning of the former Depot resulted in soil and ground-water contamination. Ground-water models have been used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to provide information on the fate and transport of contaminants on the former Depot site. During September 2003, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District, conducted a pilot study to collect two-dimensional direct-current resistivity data on the site along six profiles near existing monitoring wells. The inversion results of field data from five of the six two-dimensional direct-current resistivity profiles display distinct electrical stratigraphy consistent with three resistivity units (low resistivity, high resistivity, and low resistivity). These three resistivity units correlate with rock-stratigraphic or hydrogeologic units described prior to this study. To interpret the resistivity profiles, additional data extending through the lower confining unit into the underlying Niobrara Formation could be used with the existing data to construct forward models for data analysis and interpretation.

#### Study Area
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on form
10-K/A, of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ JAMES A. CALDERJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer 12