alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1328. Merchant vessels of the United States

Five thousand copies of the annual list of merchant vessels of the United States may be printed for distribution by the Coast Guard.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1270.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §249 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 616; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §4, 32 Stat. 826; June 30, 1932, ch. 314, §501, 47 Stat. 415; May 27, 1936, ch. 463, §1, 49 Stat. 1380; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §§101–104, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7875, 60 Stat. 1097).

The first paragraph of former section 249, act Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 616, was omitted as obsolete. Paragraph related to report on Commerce and Navigation and on Internal Commerce. These reports were discontinued.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
#### § 401.1 What is the purpose of part 401?

This part contains the regulations implementing the authority in the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 (MAHRA) for the Mark-to-Market Program. Section 511(b) of MAHRA details the purposes, and section 512(2) details the scope, of the Program.
### §§616t to 616w. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616t, Pub. L. 87–706, §1, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 634, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of Baker project, Oregon.

Section 616u, Pub. L. 87–706, §2, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 634, related to extension of period of repayment of construction costs, excess lands and conditions for furnishing water to these lands, and computation of acreage.

Section 616v, Pub. L. 87–706, §3, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 634, related to construction, operation, and maintenance of public recreational facilities and development of fish and wildlife in connection with this project and operation of this project for flood control.

Section 616w, Pub. L. 87–706, §4, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 635, authorized appropriations for this project.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Charles Curatalo, Respondent. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

— Motion to amend the memorandum decision of this court, handed down July 12, I960' *{ante,*p. 840), or for reargument, or, in the alternative, for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs.
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judgefor the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-2621

___________ Wilma F. Bankston, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED] Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 19, 2010 Filed: March 26, 2010

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Wilma F. Bankston appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. Bankston a lleged disability from anxiety, depression, diabetes, arthritis, h eadaches, a seizure disorder, and short-term memory loss. After a hearing, an administrative law judge determined that Bankston’s severe impairments--major depression, Type II di abetes with neuropathy, arthritis, and-2- obesity--did not meet or equal the requireme nts of any listing, alone or combined, and that her subjective complaints were not en tirely credible. The ALJ concluded further, relying on the testimony of a vocational expert and using the Medical Vocational Guidelines as a framework, that even though Bankston’s residual functional capacity precluded her past relevant wo rk, she could perform other jobs existing in significant numbers. The Appeals Council de nied review, and the distri ct court affirmed. Having conducted careful de novo review of the r ecord and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we agree with the district court th at substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the denial of benefits. See Tilley v Astrue , 580 F.3d 675, 679 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). We reject without further discussion the arguments in Bankston’s counseled brief, because they are unsupported by the record, are legally unsupported, or are not sufficiently developed. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
### §231g. Court jurisdiction

Decisions of the Board determining the rights or liabilities of any person under this subchapter shall be subject to judicial review in the same manner, subject to the same limitations, and all provisions of law shall apply in the same manner as though the decision were a determination of corresponding rights or liabilities under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act [45 U.S.C. 351 et seq.] except that the time within which proceedings for the review of a decision with respect to an annuity, supplemental annuity, or lump-sum benefit may be commenced shall be one year after the decision will have been entered upon the records of the Board and communicated to the claimant.

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, §8, as restated June 24, 1937, ch. 382, pt. I, 50 Stat. 307, as restated Pub. L. 93–445, title I, §101, Oct. 16, 1974, 88 Stat. 1343.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 680, 52 Stat. 1094, which is classified principally to chapter 11 (§351 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 367 of this title and Tables.
H. R. 289

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8200 South 

Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class John 

Marshall Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

8200 South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class John Marshall 

Post Office Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant 

First Class John Marshall Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### § 1000.314 What is formula current assisted stock?

Formula current assisted stock is current assisted stock as described in § 1000.312 plus 1937 Act units in the development pipeline when they become owned or operated by the recipient and are under management as indicated in the Formula Response Form. Formula current assisted stock also includes Section 8 units when their current contract expires and the Indian tribe continues to manage the assistance in a manner similar to the Section 8 program, as reported on the Formula Response Form.
### §1109. Printing documents in two or more editions; full number and allotment of full quota

The number of copies of a public document or report authorized to be printed for an executive department, independent agency, or establishment of the Government may be supplied in two or more editions, instead of one, upon a requisition on the Director of the Government Publishing Office by the head of the department or independent office, but the aggregate of the editions may not exceed the number of copies otherwise authorized. This section does not preclude the printing of the full number of a document or report, or the allotment of the full quota to Senators and Representatives, as otherwise authorized, when a legitimate demand for the full complement is known to exist.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1262; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §224 (Mar. 30, 1906, No. 14, 34 Stat. 826).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
#### § 202.4 Request for determination of compliance.

Pursuant to section 539(a) of the Act, any person may file a request that the Secretary determine whether a lender or mortgagee is in compliance with § 202.12(a) or with provisions of this chapter implementing sections 223(a)(7) and 535 of the Act such as §§ 201.10(g), 203.18d and 203.43(c)(5) of this chapter (only section 535 applies to lenders). The request for determination shall be made to the following address: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Lender Activities and Program Compliance, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, 20410. The Secretary shall inform the requestor of the disposition of the request. The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register the disposition of any case referred by the Secretary to the Mortgagee Review Board.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-628 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 

GLOBE Program 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the REPUBLIC OF CONGO 

Agreement Signed at Brazzaville June 28, 2005 

 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
REPUBLIC OF CONGO 

Environmental Cooperation: GLOBE Program 

Agreement signed at Brazzaville June 28, 2005; 

 Entered into force June 28, 2005.
### §2244. Effect of chapter on other laws

#### (a) Conformity with State and Federal law

All actions taken pursuant to this chapter pertaining to the diversion, storage, use, or transfer of water shall be in conformity with applicable State and applicable Federal law.

#### (b) Effect on jurisdiction, authority, and water rights

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as expanding or diminishing State, Federal, or tribal jurisdiction or authority over water resources development, control, or water rights.

(Pub. L. 102–250, title III, §304, Mar. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 59.)
§ 50.17 Decision points for projects. Either an EA and FONSI or an EIS for individual projects shall be completed before the applicable program decision points below for projects not meeting the criteria of § 50.20. Compliance with applicable authorities cited in § 50.4 shall be completed before the applicable program decision points below unless the project meets the criteria for exclusion under § 50.19. ( a ) *New Construction.* ( 1 ) Project mortgage insurance or other financial assistance for multifamily housing projects (including sections 202 and 811), nursing homes, hospitals, group practice facilities and manufactured home parks: Issuance of Site Appraisal and Market Analysis (SAMA) Letter or initial equivalent indication of HUD approval of a specific site;
( 2 ) *Public Housing: HUD approval of the proposal.*
( 3 ) *Loan Guarantee Recovery Fund Program ( 24 CFR part 573 ).* HUD issuance of a letter of commitment or initial equivalent indication of HUD approval.
( b ) *Rehabilitation projects.* Use the decision points under “new construction” for HUD programs cited in paragraph (a) of this section; otherwise the decision point is the HUD project approval.
( c ) *Public housing modernization programs.* HUD approval of the modernization grants.
( d ) *Property Disposition.* Multifamily structures, college housing, nursing homes, manufactured homes and parks, group practice facilities, vacant land and one to four family structures: HUD approval of the Disposition Program.
( e ) *HUD programs subject to 24 CFR part 58 .* For cases in which HUD exercises environmental responsibility under this part where a recipient lacks legal capacity to do so or HUD determines to do so in place of a nonrecipient responsible entity under 24 CFR part 58 (see § 50.1(d)), the decision point is: HUD's execution of an agreement or contract, whichever comes first, or in the case of Section 8 Project-Based Voucher Assistance and Moderate Rehabilitation, HUD notification to the Public Housing Agency to proceed with execution of an Agreement to Enter into Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) Contract.
( f ) *Section 50.3(h).* Notwithstanding the other paragraphs of this section, the decision point for grant programs in which HUD approval of funding for an applicant's program must occur before the applicant's selection of properties for use in its program is: HUD approval of specific properties.
( g ) *Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act Programs.* Where the recipients are nonprofit organizations or governmental entities with special or limited purpose powers, the decision point is: HUD project approval.
( h ) *Programs not specifically covered in this section.* Consult with the AS/CPD for decision points.
[61 FR 50916, Sept. 27, 1996, as amended at 89 FR 38290, May 7, 2024]
§ 27.111 Adjournment or cancellation of sale. ( a ) The foreclosure commissioner may, before or at the time of the foreclosure sale, adjourn or cancel the foreclosure sale in accordance with the provisions of the Statute. The publication of the Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale, revised pursuant to the Statute, may be made on any of three separate days before the revised date of foreclosure sale. If there is no newspaper of general circulation that would permit publication on any of three separate days before the revised date of foreclosure sale, the Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale must be posted, not less than nine days before the date to which the sale has been adjourned, at the courthouse of any county or counties in which the property is located, and at the place where the sale is to be held. The commissioner must also, in the case of a sale adjourned to a later date, mail a copy of the revised Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale to the Secretary at least seven days before the date to which the sale has been adjourned.
( b ) When a substitute commissioner is designated by the Secretary to replace a previously designated foreclosure commissioner, the sale shall continue without prejudice unless the substitute commissioner finds, in that commissioner's sole discretion, that continuation of the foreclosure sale will unfairly affect the interests of the mortgagor. Any such finding shall be in writing. If the substitute commissioner makes such a finding, the substitute commissioner shall cancel or adjourn the sale.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer

I,
Joseph V. Vittoria, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the nine months ended
 September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                           

| |                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | November
 15, 2010                                                        
| |                                                                           
| | /s/
 Joseph V Vittoria                                                    
| | Name:
 Joseph V. Vittoria                                                 
| | Title: Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer,
 principal executive officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

30

---
Reducing Poverty Through Growth

Fact Sheet

July 20, 2005 www.mcc.gov

The Republic of Senegal and Millennium Challenge 

Corporation: Transforming Senegal’s Economy

The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) has approved a grant of up to $6.5 million to assist Senegal in the 

development of its Compact. This sum represents the largest amount of financing to date that MCC has committed to any country for Compact development.

Senegal’s Compact proposal contemplates construction of a large-scale industrial, commercial, and residential 

development to be located 30 kilometers southeast of the capital city of Dakar . The project, called the Diamniadio Platform, seeks to address one of Senegal’s greatest impediments to poverty reduction and sustainable 

economic growth, which is the lack of suitable space on the Dakar Peninsula for commercial and industrial 

expansion. The project is designed to promote a more fertile environment for local and foreign investment in 

the economy and create a significant number of new jobs in Senegal . The scale and complexity of this proposal 

require detailed analysis and design to ensure that the Platform has the optimal impact on economic growth and 

poverty reduction.

The approved Compact development funding will be used to complete the following baseline, feasibility, and 

technical design studies and other assessments of the Diamniadio Platform proposal:

•	 A survey of prospective industries to determine the extent of demand for industrial space outside the 

Dakar Peninsula and the necessary infrastructure for these industries;

•	 A survey of land ownership and social issues to help formulate policies related to future land management of the Platform; and

•	 Feasibility studies of the Platform’s environmental and social impacts, institutional arrangements, and 

development of a preliminary design and construction model for the Platform’s core infrastructure.

These studies will build on the analysis completed by the Government, and will be conducted in cooperation 

with the MCA Implementing Agency. Under the leadership of the MCA Implementing Agency, civil society and 

private sector representatives will continue to be essential participants in the Compact development process.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. WARD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 24, 1903.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against Peter Ward.

No opinion. Judgment of conviction and orders affirmed.
### §955. Amendment, alteration, or repeal

Congress may at any time amend, alter, or repeal sections 952 to 955 of this title.

(Jan. 13, 1897, ch. 11, §4, 29 Stat. 484.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
§ 26.24 Rules of evidence. ( a ) *Evidence.* Every party shall have the right to present its case or defense by oral and documentary evidence, unless otherwise limited by law or regulation, to conduct such cross-examination and to submit rebuttal evidence as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts. Irrelevant, immaterial, privileged, or unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. Unless otherwise provided for in this part, the Federal Rules of Evidence shall provide guidance to the hearing officer in the conduct of proceedings under this part, but shall not be binding. Parties may object to clearly irrelevant material, but technical and hearsay objections to testimony as used in a court of law will not be sustained.
( b ) *Testimony under oath or affirmation.* All witnesses shall testify under oath or affirmation.
( c ) *Objections.* Objections to the admission or exclusion of evidence shall be in short form, stating the grounds of objections. Rulings on objections shall be a part of the transcript. Failure to object to admission or exclusion of evidence or to any evidentiary ruling shall be considered a waiver of objection, but no exception to a ruling on an objection is necessary in order to preserve it for appeal.
( d ) *Authenticity of documents.* Unless specifically challenged, it shall be presumed that all relevant documents are authentic. An objection to the authenticity of a document shall not be sustained merely on the basis that it is not the original.
( e ) *Stipulations.* The parties may stipulate as to any relevant matters of fact. Stipulations may be received in evidence at a hearing, and when received shall be binding on the parties with respect to the matters stipulated. The parties are encouraged to enter into stipulations of fact whenever possible.
( f ) *Official notice.* All matters officially noticed by the hearing officer shall appear on the record.
( g ) *Burden of proof.* The burden of proof shall be upon the proponent of an action or affirmative defense, including, where applicable, mitigating factors, unless otherwise provided by law or regulation.