alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3064

To prohibit the use of funds to implement certain regulations that restrict 

travel to Cuba for educational activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2005

Ms. LEE (for herself, Mr. RANGEL, and Mr. MCDERMOTT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL

To prohibit the use of funds to implement certain regulations 

that restrict travel to Cuba for educational activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pursuit of Inter5 national Education Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 3064 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT 

2 CERTAIN REGULATIONS THAT RESTRICT 

3 TRAVEL TO CUBA FOR EDUCATIONAL ACTIVI4 TIES. 

5 No funds available to the Department of the Treas6 ury may be used to implement, administer, or enforce the 

7 amendments made to paragraphs (a) and (b) of section 

8 515.565 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (relating 

9 to specific licenses for United States academic institutions 

10 and other specific licenses), as published in the Federal 

11 Register on June 16, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 33772). The 

12 limitation in the preceding sentence shall not apply to the 

13 implementation, administration, or enforcement of section 

14 515.560(c)(3) of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations.

Æ
### §852b. Survey of lands prior to transfer; time for survey; availability of funds; lands suitable for transfer

Prior to issuance of an instrument of transfer, lands must be surveyed. The Secretary of the Interior shall within five years, subject to the availability of funds, survey the exterior boundaries of lands approved as suitable for transfer to the State.

(Pub. L. 89–470, §4, June 24, 1966, 80 Stat. 220.)
### §561. Survey and subdivision of land for town sites; reservation for public purposes

The Secretary of the Interior may in connection with irrigation projects under the reclamation Act of June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and two, not exceeding one hundred and sixty acres in each case, survey and subdivide the same into town lots, with appropriate reservations for public purposes: Provided, That, whenever, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior, it shall be advisable for the public interest, he may dispose of town sites in excess of one hundred and sixty acres.

(Apr. 16, 1906, ch. 1631, §1, 34 Stat. 116; June 27, 1906, ch. 3559, §4, 34 Stat. 520; Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The reclamation Act of June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and two, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Introductory provisions are from the first section of act Apr. 16, 1906. The proviso is from part of the proviso of section 4 of act June 27, 1906. Another part of the proviso of section 4 of act June 27, 1906, is classified to section 568 of this title. The remainder of section 4 of act June 27, 1906, was classified to former section 594 of this title.

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–579 struck out provisions authorizing withdrawal from public entry any lands needed for town-site purposes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the amendment made by section 704(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3085 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3085

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and 
 suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National 
  Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, 
 land components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVISION OF FEASIBILITY AND SUITABILITY STUDY OF TRAIL OF 
              TEARS NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.

    Section 5(a)(16) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 
1244(a)(16)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``subsections'' and 
        inserting ``sections''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(C) Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall complete the remaining 
criteria and submit to Congress a study regarding the feasibility and 
suitability of designating, as additional components of the Trail of 
Tears National Historic Trail, the following routes and land components 
by which the Cherokee Nation was removed to Oklahoma:
            ``(i) The Benge and Bell routes.
            ``(ii) The land components of the designated water routes 
        in Alabama, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.
            ``(iii) The routes from the collection forts in Alabama, 
        Georgia, North Carolina, and Tennessee to the emigration 
        depots.
            ``(iv) The related campgrounds located along the routes and 
        land components described in clauses (i) through (iii).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 17, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3085

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the National Trails System Act to update the feasibility and 
 suitability study originally prepared for the Trail of Tears National 
  Historic Trail and provide for the inclusion of new trail segments, 
 land components, and campgrounds associated with that trail, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
ACCEPTED

wr14-00126

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

3/27/2015 3:09:14 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/27/2015 3:09:14 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CASE NO.: C09-CV-01360 MMC-NMC 

JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL 

Justin F. Boyce (State Bar No. 181488)

justin.boyce@dechert.com

Jeffrey Fisher (pro hac vice)

jeffrey.fisher@dechert.com

DECHERT LLP 

2440 W. El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Mountain View, CA 94040-1499 

Telephone: (650) 813-4800 

Facsimile: (650) 813-4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ADVANCED ANALOGIC 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

corporation,

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

KINETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Defendant.

Civil Action No. C09-cv-01360 MMC-NMC

JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL 

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii); [Proposed] ORDER 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Advanced Analogic 

Technologies, Inc., and Defendant Kinetic Technologies, Inc., through their respective counsel of 

record, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of all pending claims, counterclaims, and defenses 

currently pending in the above-captioned action WITH PREJUDICE.

The parties agree that each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Case 3:09-cv-01360-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 2
DECHERT LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SILICON VALLEY

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 CASE NO.: C09-CV-01360 MMC-NMC 

JOINT STIPULATED DISMISSAL 

Dated: June 18, 2015 

DECHERT LLP 

By: /s/ Justin F. Boyce 

Justin F. Boyce (SBN 181488) 

justin.boyce@dechert.com

Jeffrey Fisher (pro hac vice)

jeffrey.fisher@dechert.com

DECHERT LLP 

2440 W. El Camino Real, Suite 700 

Mountain View, CA 94040-1499 

Telephone: (650) 813-4800 

Facsimile: (650) 813-4848 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc. 

Dated: June 18, 2015 

KIRKPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

By: /s/ Jon Michaelson 

Jon Michaelson (SBN 83815) 

jmichaelson@kilpatricktownsend.com 

KIRKPATRICK TOWNSEND & 

STOCKTON LLP 

1080 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

Telephone: (650) 326-2400 

Facsimile: (650) 326-2422 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Kinetic Technologies, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

June 19, 2015

Case 3:09-cv-01360-MMC Document 104 Filed 06/19/15 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report
of GlobalOptions Group, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harvey W. Schiller, Principal Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





March
      16, 2010
                    /s/ Harvey W. SchillerName:
                    Harvey
      W. SchillerTitle:
                    Chairman
      of the Board and
                      Chief
      Executive Officer
                      (Principal
      Executive
Officer)
### §1457c. Power of Secretary or designated officer

The Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate, is authorized to enforce and carry into execution, by appropriate regulations, every part of the provisions of title 32 of the Revised Statutes not otherwise specially provided for.

(R.S. §2478; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### References in Text

Title 32 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title", meaning title 32 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§2207 to 2490. For complete classification of R.S. §§2207 to 2490 to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1201 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §2478 derived from acts Sept. 28, 1850, ch. 84, §§1, 4, 9 Stat. 520; Mar. 12, 1860, ch. 5, §1, 12 Stat. 3; Feb. 19, 1874, ch. 30, 18 Stat. 16.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate" substituted for "Commissioner of the General Land Office, under the directions of the Secretary of the Interior" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2926 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2926

  To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
 1974 to require the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, in the case 
 of airline pilots who are required by regulation to retire at age 60, 
  to compute the actuarial value of monthly benefits in the form of a 
                   life annuity commencing at age 60.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2005

 Mr. George Miller of California (for himself, Ms. Schakowsky, and Mr. 
   DeFazio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
 1974 to require the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, in the case 
 of airline pilots who are required by regulation to retire at age 60, 
  to compute the actuarial value of monthly benefits in the form of a 
                   life annuity commencing at age 60.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 
Pilots Equitable Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Single-Employer Plan Benefits Guaranteed.--Section 4022(b)(3) 
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 
1322(b)(3)) is amended, in the flush matter following subparagraph (B), 
by adding at the end the following: ``If, at the time of termination of 
a plan under this title, regulations prescribed by the Federal Aviation 
Administration require an individual to separate from service as a 
commercial airline pilot after attaining a specified age which is less 
than age 65, the first sentence of this paragraph shall be applied to 
an individual who is a participant in the plan by reason of such 
service by substituting such age for age 65.''.
    (b) Aggregate Limit on Benefits Guaranteed.--Section 4022B(a) of 
such Act (29 U.S.C. 1322b(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``If, as of such date, regulations prescribed by the Federal 
Aviation Administration require an individual to separate from service 
as a commercial airline pilot after attaining a specified age which is 
less than age 65, this subsection shall be applied to an individual who 
is a participant in any such plan by reason of such service by 
substituting such age for age 65.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to benefits payable on 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,923,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,663,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                    99,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,560,504
<PP&E>                                       3,298,240
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,164,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,703,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          950,340
<BONDS>                                        223,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,582,158
<OTHER-SE>                                     724,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,703,587
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,252,667
<CGS>                                        3,642,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,512,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,630)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (103,624)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                864,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                   328,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            536,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
JAMES JOSEPH FOUNTAIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-0767

Opinion filed August 5, 2014.

Petition Seeking Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

James Joseph Fountain, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the judgment and sentence rendered on 

June 18, 2012, in Santa Rosa County Circuit Court case numbers 2011-CF-001050 and 

2011-CF-001065, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall 

be furnished to the clerk of the lower tribunal for treatment as a notice of appeal. If 

petitioner qualifies for the services of appointed counsel at public expense, the trial 

court is directed to appoint counsel to represent him in the appeal authorized by this 

opinion.

VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.306 Withdrawal of State approval.

The Secretary shall, on the basis of reports submitted by the State, and on the basis of HUD monitoring, make a continuing evaluation of the manner in which each State is carrying out its State plan and shall submit the reports of such evaluation to the appropriate committees of the Congress. Whenever the Secretary finds, after affording due notice and opportunity for a hearing in accordance with subpart D of this part, that in the administration of the State program there is a failure to comply substantially with any provision of the State plan or that the State plan has become inadequate, the Secretary shall notify the State of withdrawal of approval or conditional approval of the State program. The State program shall cease to be in effect at such time as the Secretary may establish.
EXHIBIT 10.3
 
 FIRST AMENDMENT
 TO
 SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of June 15, 2012, by and among RoomLinX, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and the investors signatory hereto (collectively, the “Investors”).  The Company and the Investors are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Parties.”
 
 W I T N E S S E T H
 
 WHEREAS, the Parties entered into that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 4, 2012 (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”).
 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Securities Purchase Agreement as provided herein.
 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Section 6.8 of the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
 
 1.Defined terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Securities Purchase Agreement.
 
 2.The reference to “May 25, 2012” in Section 1.1 of the Securities Purchase Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with “June 20, 2012.”
 
 3.Attached as Exhibit “A” to each Investor’s copy of this Amendment is such Investor’s Selling Securityholder Notice and Questionnaire (the “Questionnaire”), as delivered by such Investor to the Company in connection with that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 4, 2012 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”).  Each Investor hereby represents and warrants to the Company that other than updates that may be necessary to account for such Investor’s purchase of Units, the Questionnaire is accurate and complete as of the date hereof, and the Investor acknowledges and agrees that the Company may rely on the beneficial ownership information contained in the Questionnaire for the purposes of the Registration Statement on Form S-1 that the Company intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as contemplated by the Registration Rights Agreement.
 
 4.This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. Signatures delivered by facsimile or electronic mail shall be deemed original signatures for all purposes of this Amendment.
 
 5.Except for the amendments to the Securities Purchase Agreement specifically set forth in this Amendment, the Securities Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in all respects.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement as of the date first written above.
 
 Roomlinx, Inc.By:
/s/ Michael S. WasikMichael S. WasikChief Executive Officer
#### Frank Mirabilio et al., Respondents, v. Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of services, the defendant, Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, appeals, by permission of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, from an order of that court, dated November 24, 1961, unanimously affirming a judgment of the District Court of *958the County of Nassau, First District, rendered April 10, 1961 after a jury trial in favor of the plaintiff wife for $1,500 and in favor of the plaintiff husband for $71. Order and judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and complaint dismissed on the law as indicated herein. Plaintiff wife testified that on December 13, 1957, while she was walking on a sidewalk in front of a Woolworth store in the Incorporated Village of Valley Stream, she tripped on something and was caused to fall, sustaining injuries. Although there were patches of slush on the sidewalk, the evidence establishes that the sidewalk was merely wet at the place where said plaintiff fell. At the time of the accident, she was carrying bundles, large and small, and a poeketbook; she did not know what caused her to trip. However, upon viewing the sidewalk some six days later, she saw an unevenness between two of its concrete portions, and concluded that such defect caused her to trip. In our opinion, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the finding or to establish prima facie that the plaintiff wife’s injuries were the result of her tripping upon the uneven concrete (cf. *Doria*v. *Village of Mamaroneck,*12 A D 2d 952). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 19.13-2 Share payable to a former spouse.

A former spouse of a participant or annuitant is entitled to a prorata share of 50 percent of any lump-sum payment authorized to be paid to a former participant under this section who separated from the Service on or after February 15, 1981, unless otherwise directed in a court order or a spousal agreement.