T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PATR I CI A ELI ZABE TH NO SI E, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. AS S OC I AT I ON OF F L I GH T AT T E ND AN T S - C WA, AF L - C I O, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 17871 D. C . No . 1 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 0 6 2 - AC KLE K ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H a w a ii A l a n C . K a y , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , P A E Z , a n d B E A , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P a tr i c i aE l i z abe th N os i e appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt d is m is s in g h e ra c tio n a lle g in g d is c r im in a tio n a n d v io la tio n o f th e d u tyo f

f a ir r e p r e s e n ta tio n b yh e rf

o rm e ru n io n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . 

# FI LED APR26 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 17871 2 W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , Ch o l la R ea d y Mi x, In c. v. C i vish , 38 2 F . 3d 96 9, 97 3 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ) , a n d w e a f

f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssed N o si e’ s d i scri m i n at i o n cl ai m s b ecau se N osi e f ai l ed t o al l ege f

ac t s s uffi ci entt o sho w thatshe “ w as si ng l ed ou tand tre at ed l e s s f a vor abl ytha n othe r s s i m i l a r l ys i tua t e d on a c c ountof ” he rs e x, r a c e , c ol oror a g e . B e c k

v . U ni te d Food & C om m e r c i al W orke rs U ni on, L oc al

99 , 506 F . 3d 874, 8 8 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( c ita tio n a n d in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ( s e ttin g f o rth pri m a f ac i e c as e f

or a T i t l e V II di sc ri m i nat i on cl ai m agai nsta uni on ); see a l so Sh el leyv. G er en , 6 6 6 F .3 d 5 9 9 , 6 0 7 - 0 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 2 ) ( ap p ly in g T itle V I I a n a ly s is t o cl ai m s und erthe A ge D i sc ri m i nat i on i n E m pl oym entA ct ). T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed N osi e’ s f ai r r epre se nt at i on cl ai m s a s t i m e- barr ed because N osi e di d n otfi l e herac t i on w i thi n si x m on ths of l earni ng that her f orm erun i on w ou l d p ursue hergri evance no further. See Stal lcop v. Kaise r Fo u n d. H

o sp s. , 820 F . 2d 1044, 1049 ( 9th C i r . 1987) ( pl a i nt i f f’ s f a i rr e pr e s e nt a t i on c l a i m w a s t i m e - ba rr e d be c aus e s he di d notf i l e he ra c t i on w i thi n s i x m onths of re ce i vi ng the un i on ’ s l ett erno t i fy i ng her i tw ou l d p ursue hergri evance no further) ; Ke l l yv . B ur l i ngton N

. R . R . C o. , 8 9 6 F .2 d 1 1 9 4 , 1 1 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 0 ) ( s ix - m o n th s t a tut e of l i m i t a t i ons appl i e s t o f

a i rr e pr e s e nt a t i on c l a i m s br oughta ga i ns tuni ons c o v e r e d b yth e R a ilw a yL ab o rA c t) .10- 17871 3 N osi e’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A F F I R M E D .