alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 16.8 Agency review. ( a ) *Submission.* ( 1 ) An employee may submit the grievance for agency review if the grievance ( i ) is not within the jurisdiction of a post or bureau, or
( ii ) the grievance has been considered but not resolved to the grievant's satisfaction within the post or bureau as provided in § 16.7(c) within 10 days after receipt of the post's or bureau's decision (or, if no response is received, within 25 days after presenting it to the senior official or the designee). The grievant shall submit it in writing to the responsible official of the agency which has control of the act or condition which is the subject of the grievance.
( 2 ) *Responsible officials.* The responsible officials of the agencies are the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Personnel (State), the Director of Personnel and Manpower (AID), and the Chief, Employee-Management Relations Division (USIA).
( 3 ) *Contents.* ( i ) A request for agency review shall include a description of the act or condition which is the subject of the grievance; its effect on the grievant; any provision of law, regulation or agency policy which the grievant may believe was violated or misapplied; copies of any correspondence under § 16.7(a), any documentary evidence readily available to the grievant on which the grievance rests; the identity of individuals having knowledge of relevant facts; and a statement of the remedial action requested.
( ii ) The responsible official shall review the grievance on the basis of available documentary evidence, and, in that official's discretion, interview persons having knowledge of the facts. The agency review shall be completed and its decision dispatched within 90 days from the date of the initial written presentation of the grievance. The grievant shall be informed in writing of the findings of the responsible official and any proposed resolution of the grievance. The communication shall also include the time within which the grievant may file a grievance with the Grievance Board and the appropriate procedure to be followed in this respect.
### §1330. Monthly Summary Statement of Imports and Exports

There shall be printed monthly by the Director of the Government Publishing Office thirty-five hundred copies of the Monthly Summary Statement of Imports and Exports and other statistical information prepared by the Secretary of Commerce, five hundred for the Senate, one thousand for the House of Representatives, and two thousand for the Department of Commerce.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1270; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §298 (Dec. 18, 1895, No. 1, 29 Stat. 459; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §4, 32 Stat. 826; Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §1, 37 Stat. 407; 1950 Reorg. Plan No. 5, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
#### § 244.2 License.

The Commissioner shall not insure any mortgage under this part unless the appropriate licensing agency for the State, municipality or other political subdivision in which a project is or is to be located provides such assurances as the Commissioner considers necessary that the facility will comply with any applicable State or local standards and requirements for such facilities.
### §1302. Agriculture, Department of: monthly crop report and other publications

The Secretary of Agriculture may cause to be printed the number of copies of the monthly crop report, and of other reports and bulletins of not more than one hundred octavo pages, he considers necessary.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1266.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §213 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §89, 28 Stat. 622).

This section incorporates only the first clause of the second sentence of the second paragraph of former section 213. The balance of section 213 will be found in sections 1102, 1116, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1336.
#### § 212.13 Policy and procedures.

The component's FOIA office shall preserve all correspondence relating to the requests it receives under this subpart, and all records processed pursuant to such requests, until such time as the destruction of such correspondence and records is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Under no circumstances shall records be sent to a Federal Records Center, transferred to the permanent custody of NARA, or destroyed while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or civil action under the FOIA.
ex10_48.htm









Exhibit 10.48


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT







The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the "Employer") and Robert M. Jakobe (the "Employee") wish to amend the Employee's Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), dated April 1, 2007, to bring the Employment Agreement into compliance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and other authoritative guidance issued under that section.







WHEREAS, pursuant to IRS Notice 2007-86 and the final Treasury Regulations under Code section 409A, the Employment Agreement is being amended to comply with the final Treasury Regulations issued under Code section 409A.







Accordingly, effective April 1, 2007, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:







1.  The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6(e)(iv) is amended by deleting the phrase that appears in brackets (i.e., by deleting "[or less than fifty percent (50%), if the Employee becomes an independent contractor]").







2.  Section 10(g) – Arbitration of Disputes – is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of that Section:







"Any reimbursement of reasonable fees and expenses under this Section shall be paid by the Employer to the Employee by the March 15 following the end of the year during which the Employee prevails in the dispute giving rise to such reimbursement."







In all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective as specified herein.








	
ATTEST/WITNESS:

	  	
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	 	/s/ John A. Saxton
	  	  	  	  	  
	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	
Print Name:

	
John A. Saxton


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	/s/ Robert M. Jakobe
	  	  	  	
Robert M. Jakobe


	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp
### §147. Disposition of proceeds of sale of withdrawn lands

The moneys derived from the sale of such lands and improvements shall be disposed of as are other receipts from the sale and disposal of public lands.

(Jan. 26, 1921, ch. 27, §3, 41 Stat. 1090.)
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. George Trakas, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,578.

Forcible detainer to recover possession of news stand space in elevated railroad station. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Max C. Liss and Clarence Darrow, for appellant. Schuyler, Ettelson & Weinfeld, for appellee. ■

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 350.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to achieve the efficiencies and fungibility through use of a single system for transferring interests both in Ginnie Mae Securities and other United States Government securities and in mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. The Association only guarantees that payments required to be made by issuers of Ginnie Mae Securities will be made to the registered owner of those Ginnie Mae Securities. The Association undertakes no other obligation. Under the Book-entry System, the Federal Reserve Banks will be the registered owner of Book-entry Ginnie Mae Securities, not the agent of the Association, and the Association makes no warranty or guaranty with respect to the maintenance of the Book-entry System by the Federal Reserve Banks.
### SUBCHAPTER XXI—GILA PROJECT, ARIZONA
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3106 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fabric woven with certain continuous 

filament wholly nylon type-66 textured yarns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Mr. BEAUPREZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fabric woven with certain 

continuous filament wholly nylon type-66 textured yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FABRIC WOVEN WITH CERTAIN CONTINUOUS 

4 FILAMENT WHOLLY NYLON TYPE-66 TEX5 TURED YARNS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 
2 

•HR 3106 IH 

‘‘ 9902.10.02 Fabric woven with continuous filament wholly nylon 

type-66 textured yarns, such 

fabric capable of stretching 

by at least 100 percent in 

the weft direction (provided 

for in subheading 

5407.41.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                   TICKETMASTER GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
             (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE INFORMATION)
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
                                                              ----------------------------
                                                                  1997            1998
                                                              ------------    ------------
<S>                                                           <C>             <C>
Basic weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding...............................................   25,483,402      26,273,413
Common stock equivalents from outstanding stock options.....          n/a       1,156,728
                                                              -----------     -----------
Weighted average shares including the dilutive effect of
  stock options.............................................   25,483,402      27,430,141
                                                              ===========     ===========
Net income..................................................  $     1,881     $       607
                                                              ===========     ===========
Basic earnings per share....................................  $       .07     $       .02
                                                              ===========     ===========
Diluted earnings per share..................................  $       .07     $       .02
                                                              ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.4





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the use of our reports dated March 12, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Vermilion Energy Trust (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference relating to changes in accounting principles)  and the effectiveness of Vermilion Energy Trust’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Vermilion Energy Trust for the year ended December 31, 2009.








“/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP”





Independent Registered Chartered Accountants


Calgary, Canada


March 24, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                       270
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,822
<PP&E>                                           3,448
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,284
<BONDS>                                          1,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,517
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,632
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   144
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 28.15 Investigation. ( a ) *General.* HUD may initiate a Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (31 U.S.C. 3801) case against a respondent only upon an investigation by the Inspector General or his or her designee.
( b ) *Subpoena.* Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3804(a), the Inspector General or designee may require by subpoena the production of records and other documents. The subpoena shall state the authority under which it is issued, identify the records sought, and name the person designated to receive the records. The recipient of the subpoena shall provide a certification that the documents sought have been produced, that the documents are not available and the reasons they are not available, or that the documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( c ) *Investigation report.* If the Inspector General or designee concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, her or she shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of the investigation to the General Counsel or his or her designee.
( d ) The Inspector General may refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 3730) or for other civil relief, or may postpone submitting a report to the General Counsel to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution. The Inspector General shall report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7622

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RUFUS TIMOTHY BRINN, III, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:06-cr-00468-GBL-1; 1:08-cv-00276-GBL) 

Submitted: April 6, 2009 Decided: June 9, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rufus Timothy Brinn, III, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Elizabeth 

Zirkle, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Rufus Timothy Brinn, III, seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2008) motion as untimely. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that, although 

the district court’s dispositive procedural ruling that Brinn’s 

§ 2255 motion was untimely is debatable, see Clay v. United

States, 537 U.S. 522, 532 (2003), Brinn has not made the 

requisite showing with respect to the merits of his 

constitutional claims. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

2 
3 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### §620m. Compliance with law required in operation of facilities; enforcement of provisions

In the operation and maintenance of all facilities, authorized by Federal law and under the jurisdiction and supervision of the Secretary of the Interior, in the basin of the Colorado River, the Secretary of the Interior is directed to comply with the applicable provisions of the Colorado River Compact, the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, the Boulder Canyon Project Act [43 U.S.C. 617 et seq.], the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act [43 U.S.C. 618 et seq.], and the Treaty with the United Mexican States, in the storage and release of water from reservoirs in the Colorado River Basin. In the event of the failure of the Secretary of the Interior to so comply, any State of the Colorado River Basin may maintain an action in the Supreme Court of the United States to enforce the provisions of this section, and consent is given to the joinder of the United States as a party in such suit or suites, as a defendant or otherwise.

(Apr. 11, 1956, ch. 203, §14, 70 Stat. 110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Boulder Canyon Project Act, referred to in text, is act Dec. 21, 1928, ch. 42, 45 Stat. 1057, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§617 et seq.) of chapter 12A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 617t of this title and Tables.

The Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act, referred to in text, is act July 19, 1940, ch. 643, 54 Stat. 774, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§618 et seq.) of chapter 12A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 618o of this title and Tables.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0606 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER I TOULOUSE ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 1 , 20 2 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2021

07/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0606
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Moshe Zarmi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinking Tools,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

Dated: February 12, 2004

                                  By: Moshe Zarmi
                                      ------------------------
                                  Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and principal accounting officer
### §2905. Liability

#### (a) In general

Effective on the date of conveyance of any eligible facility under this chapter, the United States shall not be held liable by any court for damages of any kind arising out of any act, omission, or occurrence relating to the eligible facility, other than damages caused by acts of negligence committed by the United States or by agents or employees of the United States prior to the date of the conveyance.

#### (b) Effect

Nothing in this section increases the liability of the United States beyond that currently provided in chapter 171 of title 28 (commonly known as the "Federal Tort Claims Act").

(Pub. L. 116–9, title VIII, §8005, Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 808.)