alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MASHKOWITZ v. O’CONNELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 23, 1905.)

On Reargument. Judgment affirmed.

For former opinion, see 91 N. Y. Supp. 115.

Argued before BISCHOFF and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The dismissal of the complaint upon the merits involved a determination that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, as matter of .law. Municipal Court Act, § 249 (Laws 1902, p. 1561, c. 580). Hence it is to be assumed that the decision proceeded upon the admitted fact that the contract of employment of the broker was not in writing. A determination adversely to the plaintiff upon any of the issues in the case would necessarily have been expressed in the direction for judgment for the defendant, without more. The disposition made of the case is supported by authority. Whiteley v. Terry, 83 App. Div. 197, 82 N. Y. Supp. 89.; Cohen v. Boccuzzi, 42 Misc. Rep. 544, 86 N. Y. Supp. 187. And the judgment is therefore to be affirmed. In view, however, of the distinction suggested in Cody v. Dempsey, 86 App. Div. 335, 83 N. Y. Supp. 899, leave to appeal to the Appellate Division will be granted.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### §176. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792

Section, act Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 174, §§1–3, 28 Stat. 744, provided for appointment of court commissioners for certain Territories.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the repeal made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### Diane Greene, Respondent, v Irving Brand, as Executor of Morton J. Greene, Deceased,

In an action to recover one half of the proceeds of the sale of certain real property allegedly owned by plaintiff and her deceased husband either as tenants by the entirety or tenants in common, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 8, 1977, as granted the branch of plaintiff’s motion which sought to strike defendant’s fifth affirmative defense, which was based upon an antenuptial agreement between plaintiff and her husband, defendant’s decedent. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, on the memorandum decision of Mr. Justice Rodell at Special Term. (See, also, *Matter of Maguire,*251 App Div 337.) Martuscello, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 58.23 Financial assistance for environmental review.

The costs of environmental reviews, including costs incurred in complying with any of the related laws and authorities cited in § 58.5 and § 58.6, are eligible costs to the extent allowable under the HUD assistance program regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3118 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3118

        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain music boxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2005

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain music boxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MUSIC BOXES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.52      Music boxes,        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         whether or not                                                     31/2008
                         put up in sets,
                         put up for mail
                         order retail
                         sale, and each
                         weighing not over
                         6 kg together
                         with their retail
                         packaging
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9208.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 26, 2016

p0718 

# Order

Clerk July 26, 2016

150515

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150515

COA: 323426

Muskegon CC: 13

- 064018

- FH

DANIEL JENARO QUIJAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.30 5(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court for

consideration of the defendant’s issue regarding the assessment of court costs. In all

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persua ded that the

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

# AGENCY:

Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice.

This notice announces a change in benefit period eligibility under the EB program for Colorado and Kentucky.

The following changes have occurred since the publication of the last notice regarding the State's EB status:
      - Colorado's 13-week insured unemployment rate (IUR) for the week ending November 7, 2020, was 4.90 percent, falling below the 5.00 percent threshold necessary to remain “on” EB. Therefore, the EB period for Colorado ends on November 28, 2020. The state will remain in an “off” period for a minimum of 13 weeks.
      - Kentucky's 13-week IUR for the week ending November 7, 2020, was 4.67 percent, falling below the 5.00 percent threshold necessary to remain “on” EB. Therefore, the EB period for Kentucky ends on November 28, 2020. The state will remain in an “off” period for a minimum of 13 weeks.

## Information for Claimants

The duration of benefits payable in the EB Program, and the terms and conditions on which they are payable, are governed by the Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, as amended, and the operating instructions issued to the state by the U.S. Department of Labor. In the case of a state ending an EB period, the State Workforce Agency will furnish a written notice to each individual who is currently filing claims for EB of the forthcoming termination of the EB period and its effect on the individual's right to EB (20 CFR 615.13 (c)).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Office of Unemployment Insurance Room S-4524, Attn: Thomas Stengle, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210, telephone number (202) 693-2991 (this is not a toll-free number) or by email:                         *Stengle.Thomas@dol.gov.*

Signed in Washington, DC.

John Pallasch,

Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training.

[FR Doc. 2020-26647 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FW-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

1 C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

EDMUND J. FERDINAND III (Pro Hac Vice)

GRIMES & BATTERSBY, LLP

488 Main Avenue

Norwalk, CT 06851

Telephone: (203) 849-8300

Facsimile: (203) 849-9300

e-mail: ferdinand@gandb.com

ROBERT E. WHITE (Cal. Bar. No. 78567)

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT E. WHITE

177 Post Street, Suite 890

San Francisco, CA 94108

Telephone: (415) 788-6151

Facsimile: (415) 788-6154

e-mail: rew@rwhitesf.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,

CAVIT CANTINA VITICOLTORI CONSORZIO

CANTINE SOCIALI DEL TRENTINO SOCIETA

COOPERATIVA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAVIT CANTINA VITICOLTORI

CONSORZIO CANTINE SOCIALI DEL

TRENTINO SOCIETA COOPERATIVA,

Plaintiff and

Counterdefendant,

vs.

BROWMAN FAMILY VINEYARDS,

INC.

Defendant and

Counterclaimant.

CASE NO. C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

CASE NO. C 3:09-01070 JSW (EMC)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF RE ORDER REGARDING

CONSOLIDATION OF CASES DATED

3/5/10 AND CONFLICTING “AMENDED

ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE” DATED

6/9/10

(CIV. L.R. 7-11)

Upon reading the motion of Plaintiff and counterdefendant CAVIT CANTINA

VITICOLTORI CONSORZIOCANTINE SOCIALI DEL TRENTINO SOCIETA

COOPERATIVA [hereinafter “Cavit”] for administrative relief pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-11, to

reinstate the Court’s order of March 5, 2010 providing that all filings in these consolidated

matters be in Case No. 09-02470 rather than in Case No. 09-01070, the supporting declaration of

Edmund J. Ferdinand, III, and good cause appearing therefor,

Case 3:09-cv-02470-JSW Document 73 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01070-JSW Document81 Filed07/13/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF

2 C 09-02470 JSW (EMC)

IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that all future filings in these

consolidated matters be in Civil Action No. C 09-02470 JSW (EMC) and that Cavit be designated

as the plaintiff in these consolidated matters at the trial of these matters.

Dated: July ___, 2010.

 

HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

e:\grimes\adminrelief-proposed-order-02

Case3:09-cv-01070-JSW Document81 Filed07/13/10 Page2 of 2

19

Case 3:09-cv-02470-JSW Document 73 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-02057-RS   Document 17   Filed 05/20/10   Page 1 of 3

Case 3:09-cv-02057-RS   Document 17   Filed 05/20/10   Page 2 of 3

Case 3:09-cv-02057-RS   Document 17   Filed 05/20/10   Page 3 of 3
### §393. Proceeds from sale of materials, etc.

There shall be covered into the reclamation fund the proceeds of the sales of material utilized for temporary work and structures in connection with the operations under the Act of June 17, 1902, known as the reclamation Act, as well as of the sales of all other condemned property which had been purchased under the provisions thereof, and also any moneys refunded in connection with the operations under said reclamation Act.

(Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1459, 33 Stat. 1032.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, known as the reclamation Act, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:16:58-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
EXHIBIT 99.4


       INTERSTAR WHOLESALE FINANCE PTY LIMITED (FORMERLY INTERSTAR SECURITIES
                            (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED)
                  SERVICER OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Interstar Wholesale Finance
Pty Limited,  (the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the  agreement  between  Perpetual
Trustees Victoria Limited,  Interstar Wholesale Finance Pty Limited, dated as of
December 3, 1999 (the "Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

1.   Capitalized  terms used but not defined in this Officer's  Certificate have
     their  respective  meanings set forth in the Agreement,  unless the context
     requires   otherwise  or  unless   otherwise   defined  in  the   Officer's
     Certificate.

2.   As of the date  hereof,  Interstar  Wholesale  Finance  Pty  Limited is the
     Servicer of Interstar Millennium Series 2003-1G Trust.

3.   This officer's certificate is delivered pursuant to the Agreement.

4.   A review of the  activities  of the Servicer  during the period  January 1,
     2004 to  December  31,  2004 and of its  performance  under the pooling and
     servicing agreement or similar agreements was made under my supervision.

5.   Based on such review,  to my  knowledge,  the Servicer  has  fulfilled  its
     obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement or similar agreements
     relating to the Trust  (including  the Master Trust Deed dated  December 2,
     1999 and the  Investment  Management  Agreement  dated  December  3, 1999),
     throughout  such  calendar  year and,  except as set forth in  paragraph  6
     below.

6.   The following is a description of any  exceptions to paragraph 5 above:  No
     significant deficiencies were detected.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of the Servicer,
has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 24th day of March 2005.

INTERSTAR WHOLESALE FINANCE PTY LIMITED, as servicer



/s/ Sam Kyriacou
-----------------
Name:    Sam Kyriacou
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER V—AMTRAK COMMUTER SERVICES
§ 582.230 Environmental review. ( a ) Activities under this part are subject to HUD environmental regulations in part 58 of this title, except that HUD will perform an environmental review in accordance with part 50 of this title prior to its approval of any conditionally selected applications from PHAs for Fiscal Year 2000 and prior years for other than the SRO component. For activities under a grant to a PHA that generally would be subject to review under part 58, HUD may make a finding in accordance with § 58.11(d) and may itself perform the environmental review under the provisions of part 50 of this title if the recipient PHA objects in writing to the responsible entity's performing the review under part 58. Irrespective of whether the responsible entity in accord with part 58 (or HUD in accord with part 50) performs the environmental review, the recipient shall supply all available, relevant information necessary for the responsible entity (or HUD, if applicable) to perform for each property any environmental review required by this part. The recipient also shall carry out mitigating measures required by the responsible entity (or HUD, if applicable) or select alternate eligible property. HUD may eliminate from consideration any application that would require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
( b ) The recipient, its project partners and their contractors may not acquire, rehabilitate, convert, lease, repair, dispose of, demolish, or construct property for a project under this part, or commit or expend HUD or local funds for such eligible activities under this part, until the responsible entity (as defined in § 58.2 of this title) has completed the environmental review procedures required by part 58 and the environmental certification and RROF have been approved or HUD has performed an environmental review under part 50 and the recipient has received HUD approval of the property. HUD will not release grant funds if the recipient or any other party commits grant funds (*i.e.,* incurs any costs or expenditures to be paid or reimbursed with such funds) before the recipient submits and HUD approves its RROF (where such submission is required).
[68 FR 56130, Sept. 29, 2003]
§ 599.3 Definitions. In addition to the definitions of “HUD” and “Secretary” found in 24 CFR 5.100, the following definitions apply to this part: *Census tract* means a census tract, as the term is used by the Bureau of the Census, or, if census tracts are not defined for the area, a block numbering area.
*Designation* means the process by which the Secretary designates areas as Renewal Communities eligible for tax incentives and credits established by Subchapter X of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (26 U.S.C. 1400E, *et seq.*) and for any additional assistance that may be made available.
*Empowerment Zone* (EZ) means an area so designated by the Secretary in accordance with 24 CFR part 597 or 24 CFR part 598.
*Enterprise Community* (EC) means an area so designated by the Secretary in accordance with 24 CFR part 597.
*Local government* means any county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State, and any combination of these political subdivisions that is recognized by the Secretary.
*Metropolitan Area* (MA) means an area as defined to be a Metropolitan Statistical Area or Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area by the Office of Management and Budget on June 30, 1999.
*Nominated area* means an area with a population of not more than 200,000 that is nominated by one or more local governments and the State or States in which it is located, or the governing body of the Indian reservation in which it is located, for designation in accordance with this part.
*Renewal Community* (RC) means an area so designated by HUD in accordance with this part.
*Rural area* means a nominated area: ( 1 ) Which is within a local government jurisdiction or jurisdictions with a population of less than 50,000; or
( 2 ) Which is outside of an MA; or
( 3 ) Which is determined by HUD, after consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, to be a rural area. An area may qualify as a rural area under this paragraph (3) of this definition if: ( i ) It is a nominated area that crosses jurisdictional boundaries;
( ii ) The total population of the nominated area does not exceed 200,000;
( iii ) The nominated area as a whole would not satisfy the requirements of either paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition;
( iv ) Each portion of the nominated area that is located within a separate jurisdiction meets the requirements of either paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition; and
( v ) The area is specifically nominated as a rural area; or
( 4 ) Which does not meet the requirements of either paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this definition but which is determined by HUD on a case-by-case basis, after consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, to be a rural area based on information submitted to demonstrate that the nominated area should be considered as a rural area.
*State* means any State of the United States.
*Urban area* means a nominated area that is not a rural area.
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.512 Verification of eligible immigration status. ( a ) *General.* Except as described in paragraph (b) of this section and § 5.514, no individual or family applying for assistance may receive such assistance prior to the verification of the eligibility of at least the individual or one family member. Verification of eligibility consistent with § 5.514 occurs when the individual or family members have submitted documentation to the responsible entity in accordance with § 5.508.
( b ) *PHA election to provide assistance before verification.* A PHA that is a responsible entity under this subpart may elect to provide assistance to a family before the verification of the eligibility of the individual or one family member.
( c ) *Primary verification* — ( 1 ) *Automated verification system.* Primary verification of the immigration status of the person is conducted by the responsible entity through the INS automated system (INS Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE)). The INS SAVE system provides access to names, file numbers and admission numbers of noncitizens.
( 2 ) *Failure of primary verification to confirm eligible immigration status.* If the INS SAVE system does not verify eligible immigration status, secondary verification must be performed.
( d ) *Secondary verification* — ( 1 ) *Manual search of INS records.* Secondary verification is a manual search by the INS of its records to determine an individual's immigration status. The responsible entity must request secondary verification, within 10 days of receiving the results of the primary verification, if the primary verification system does not confirm eligible immigration status, or if the primary verification system verifies immigration status that is ineligible for assistance under a Section 214 covered program.
( 2 ) *Secondary verification initiated by responsible entity.* Secondary verification is initiated by the responsible entity forwarding photocopies of the original INS documents required for the immigration status declared (front and back), attached to the INS document verification request form G-845S (Document Verification Request), or such other form specified by the INS to a designated INS office for review. (Form G-845S is available from the local INS Office.)
( 3 ) *Failure of secondary verification to confirm eligible immigration status.* If the secondary verification does not confirm eligible immigration status, the responsible entity shall issue to the family the notice described in § 5.514(d), which includes notification of the right to appeal to the INS of the INS finding on immigration status (see § 5.514(d)(4)).
( e ) *Exemption from liability for INS verification.* The responsible entity shall not be liable for any action, delay, or failure of the INS in conducting the automated or manual verification.
[61 FR 13616, Mar. 27, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 60539, Nov. 29, 1996; 64 FR 25731, May 12, 1999]
#### § 570.709 Allocation of loan guarantee assistance.

Of the amount approved in any appropriation act for guarantees under this subpart in any fiscal year, 70 percent shall be allocated for entitlement public entities and 30 percent shall be allocated for States and nonentitlement public entities. HUD need not comply with these percentage requirements in any fiscal year to the extent that there is an absence of applications approvable under this subpart from entitlement public entities or from States and nonentitlement public entities.

[74 FR 36389, July 22, 2009]