alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fact Sheet

SOCIAL SECURITY 

SSA Press Office 440 Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235 410-965-8904 

FAX 410-966-9973 

Social Security Is Important to African Americans 

Social Security is neutral with respect to race or ethnicity – individuals with identical 

earnings histories are treated the same in terms of benefits. This Fact Sheet is provided by 

the Social Security Administration to highlight how African Americans benefit from the 

Social Security program and how certain demographic characteristics of African 

Americans compare with the entire population. 

• The Social Security system is progressive in that lower-wage earners receive a higher 

percentage benefit than higher-wage earners do. The system returns a greater percentage 

of pre-retirement earnings to a lower-wage worker than to a higher-wage worker. African 

Americans who are low-wage workers receive back more benefits in relation to past 

earnings than do high-wage earners. 

o In 2007, the median earnings of working-age African Americans who worked 

full-time, year round were about $32,000, compared to $40,000 for all workingage people. 

• In 2007, the average annual Social Security income received by African American men 

65 years and older was $12,042, compared to $10,052 for African American women. 

• In 2007, among African Americans receiving Social Security, 30 percent of elderly 

married couples and 57 percent of unmarried elderly persons relied on Social Security for 

90 percent or more of their income.

• African Americans have lower life expectancies than other races at age 65. 

o African American men who are age 65 in 2005 can expect to live to age 79, 

compared to age 81 for all men. 

o African American women who are age 65 in 2005 can expect to live to age 83, 

compared to age 85 for all women 

• African Americans benefit from survivors insurance. In 2006, African Americans made 

up approximately 13 percent of the American population; however, twenty percent of all 

children receiving Social Security survivor benefits were African American. 
• African Americans benefit from disability insurance. In 2006, 13 percent of the 

population was African American; however, 17 percent of disabled workers receiving 

benefits were African American. 

• African Americans receiving benefits are helped by Social Security's cost-of-living 

protection which guarantees a benefit that is annually adjusted for inflation. 

• The African American population in the U.S. is expected to grow. Today, 13 percent of 

the population is of African American origin. This proportion is expected to grow to 15 

percent by 2050. 

This fact sheet is designed to provide general information and does not apply to all individuals 

within the African American population.
#### In the Matter of First National Bank of Glens Falls, as Executor of Adelia H. Reoux, Deceased, Petitioner, against Harry A. Reoux, Respondent.

This motion is made in the first instance in the Appellate Division to *877punish the judgment debtor for contempt of court as a result of certain .answers given in supplementary proceedings respecting his assets. On December 31, 1959 (9 A D 2d 1005) this court modified a prior order at Special Term adjudging the judgment debtor to be in contempt; and the order here permitted him to purge himself by answering questions relating to his assets. The judgment creditor asserts that the answers made by the judgment debtor when he appeared for examination were contemptuous. The application is made to this court rather than at Special Term to punish the judgment debtor on the theory that *the*questions were answered in pursuance of an alternative afforded the judgment debtor in our order. The Supreme Court is, as the moving party argues, one judicial institution, and the Appellate Division has constitutional power to exercise all its jurisdiction *(Matter of Mitehel*v. *Gropsey, 177*App. Div. 663; *Matter of Bar Assn, of City of New*York, 222 App. Div. 580). It is, however, the clear intent of the practice that the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court will devote itself to appellate work (Civ. Prac. Act, art. 39) and that original motions in actions or proceedings are to be made in the Special Term of the Supreme Court (Rules Civ. Prac., tit. 10). Exceptions permitting first-instance proceedings to be brought or motions to be made in the Appellate Division are all clearly laid out by statute (cf. Judiciary Law, § 149; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1287). When an Appellate Division reverses or modifies an order of Special Term to make new or different directions, it retains no direct procedural control of that order and new proceedings in relation to it remain at Special Term. If, for example, a further bill of particulars were directed by an Appellate Division in an order of reversal, and the party entitled to the bill complained he did not get all he was entitled to, he would move at Special Term for relief. It would greatly confuse the practice if an Appellate Division undertook to exercise a continuing initial jurisdiction of further proceedings under all of its orders of reversal or modification. The extraordinary circumstances in which the Appellate Division of the Second Department in *Matter of Mitehel*v. *Gropsey (supra)*had before it a prohibition proceeding against a Justice of the Supreme Court in which it had original jurisdiction and also took jurisdiction of a motion ordinarily returnable at Special Term, but affecting the action of that Justice arising from the same controversy, are certainly not before us in this case. Judgment creditor should pursue its remedy by motion to punish the judgment debtor for contempt at Special Term according to the usual course of practice. Motion dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Herlihy, J., taking no part.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 160 ) M-K - (B)-15 9 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:53 AM Sheet 160of 325P. 2 

## "~ Y ENERG YAND ENVIRONMENTA L ANALYSIS , INC . * — t 165 5 NORT

HPOR T MYE RDRIV E ARLINGTON

, VIRGINI

A 2220 9 703/528-190 0

Decembe r 14 , 198 4 

# A-83-2 7
II-K-(B)-15 9

Mr . Rober t Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branc h U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Mai l Drop-1 2 Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Subject : EPAContrac t No . 68-02-4202 , Wor k Assignmen t # 3 Dea r Robert : Attache d ar e 199 0 IFCA Mprojection s fo r a newscenario . Aspecia l S0 2 emission s limi t fo r ne wresidua l fue l oil-fire d boiler s wa s assume d i f the annua l capacit yutilizatio n rat e i s les s than 3 0 percent . Sincerely ,
TH/c e Enclosur e cc : Dr . A . Weh e / ^>K V M0}3-_t W Ti mHoga n / /

MANAGEMEN T / ECONOMIC S / ENGINEERIN GP. 3

_ - *- »

199 0 IFCA MPROJECTIONS *

S 0 2 emission s (IO 3 shor t tons ) Annualize dcost s (IO 6 $ 1982 ) Fue l demand (IO 1 2 Btu ) coa l residua l fue l oi l natura l ga s 100-15 0



### 15 

### 93 8

0 6 7 6 2 Boile r siz e

150-20 0 

### 9 76 2

0 5 8 5 4 (MMBtu/hr )

200-25 0 

### 5 46 0

0 3 3 3 4 >25 0



### 2 0 1,30 7

2 6 6 7 9 8 >10 0 

### 5 0 3,46 7

2 6 22 5 24 8 Ne windustria l fossi l fuel-fire d boiler s installe dafte r 1985 . Referenc e cas e fue l prices . Coal : 0. 6 l bS0 ? /MMBtu . Residua l fuel - oil : 0. 3 l b S0 2 /MMBt u i f capacit yutilizatio nrat e i s >3 0 percent , 0. 8 l bS0 2 /MMBt u i f capacit yutilizatio nrat e i s <3 0 percent .
Case 3:09-cv-02236-SI Document 120 Filed 02/05/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
INverso Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Bonnie Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  October
      12, 2009
            /s/  Bonnie
      L. HartmanBy:  Bonnie
      L. HartmanIts:  Chief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
INverso Corp. and will be retained by INverso Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Part A—Sale of Conrail
### SUBCHAPTER X—OATHS IN CERTAIN LAND MATTERS
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: July 26, 2012


By:
/s/ Michael S. WasikMichael S. WasikChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 35.1335 Standard treatments. Standard treatments shall be conducted in accordance with this section. ( a ) *Paint stabilization.* All deteriorated paint on exterior and interior surfaces located on the residential property shall be stabilized in accordance with § 35.1330(a)(b), or abated in accordance with § 35.1325.
( b ) *Smooth and cleanable horizontal surfaces.* All horizontal surfaces, such as uncarpeted floors, stairs, interior window sills and window troughs, that are rough, pitted, or porous, shall be covered with a smooth, cleanable covering or coating, such as metal coil stock, plastic, polyurethane, or linoleum.
( c ) *Correcting dust-generating conditions.* Conditions causing friction or impact of painted surfaces shall be corrected in accordance with § 35.1330(c)(4)-(6).
( d ) *Bare residential soil.* Bare soil shall be treated in accordance with the requirements of § 35.1330, unless it is found not to be a soil-lead hazard in accordance with § 35.1320(b).
( e ) *Safe work practices.* All standard treatments described in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section shall incorporate the use of safe work practices in accordance with § 35.1350.
( f ) *Clearance.* A clearance examination shall be performed in accordance with § 35.1340 at the conclusion of any lead hazard reduction activities.
( g ) *Qualifications.* An individual performing standard treatments must meet the training and/or supervision requirements of § 35.1330(a)(4).
§ 570.427 Program amendments. ( a ) *HUD approval of certain program amendments.* Grantees shall request prior HUD approval for all program amendments involving new activities or alteration of existing activities that will significantly change the scope, location, or objectives of the approved activities or beneficiaries. Approval is subject to the amended activities meeting the requirements of this part and being able to be completed promptly.
( b ) *Documentation of program amendments.* Any program amendments that do not require HUD approval must be fully documented in the grantee's records.
( c ) *Citizen participation requirements.* Whenever an amendment requires HUD approval, the requirements for citizen participation in § 570.431 must be met.
[62 FR 62914, Nov. 25, 1997, as amended at 72 FR 46370, Aug. 17, 2007]
### §4102. Fees

(a) In General.—The Superintendent of Documents, under the direction of the Director of the Government Publishing Office, may charge reasonable fees for use of the directory and the system of access provided for under section 4101, except that use of the directory and the system shall be made available to depository libraries without charge. The fees received shall be treated in the same manner as moneys received from sale of documents under section 1702 of this title.

(b) Cost Recovery.—The fees charged under this section shall be set so as to recover the incremental cost of dissemination of the information involved, with the cost to be computed without regard to section 1708 of this title.

(Added Pub. L. 103–40, §2(a), June 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 113; amended Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
#### § 51.208 Reservation of administrative and legal rights.

Publication of these standards does not constitute a waiver of any right: (a) Of HUD to disapprove a project proposal if the siting is too close to a potential hazard not covered by this subpart, and (b) of HUD or any person or other entity to seek to abate or to collect damages occasioned by a nuisance, whether or not covered by the subpart.
### §1748d. Report on wildfire, insect infestation, and disease prevention on Federal land

Not later than 180 days after December 20, 2018, and every year thereafter, the Secretary and the Secretary of Interior 1 shall submit to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate, and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a jointly written report on—

(1) the number of acres of Federal land treated by the Secretary or the Secretary of the Interior for wildfire, insect infestation, or disease prevention;

(2) the number of acres of Federal land categorized as a high or extreme fire risk;

(3) the total timber production from Federal land;

(4) the number of acres and average fire intensity of wildfires affecting Federal land treated for wildfire, insect infestation, or disease prevention;

(5) the number of acres and average fire intensity of wildfires affecting Federal land not treated for wildfire, insect infestation, or disease prevention;

(6) the Federal response time for each fire on greater than 25,000 acres;

(7) the number of miles of roads and trails on Federal land in need of maintenance;

(8) the number of miles of roads on Federal land in need of decommissioning;

(9) the maintenance backlog, as of the date of the report, for roads, trails, and recreational facilities on Federal land;

(10) other measures needed to maintain, improve, or restore water quality on Federal land; and

(11) other measures needed to improve ecosystem function or resiliency on Federal land.

(Pub. L. 115–334, title VIII, §8706, Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4880.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, and not as part of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" means the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 2 of Pub. L. 115–334, set out as a note under section 9001 of Title 7, Agriculture.

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "the".
### §390g–5. Authorization of appropriations to carry out phase II

There is authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1983, $31,000,000 (October 1990 price levels) plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be required by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indexes applicable to the type of construction involved herein to carry out phase II. Amounts shall be made available pursuant to the authorization contained in this section in sums for individual projects based on findings of feasibility by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 98–434, §7, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1677; Pub. L. 102–575, title XXVI, §2601(3), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4689.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–575 substituted "$31,000,000 (October 1990 price levels) plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be required by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indexes applicable to the type of construction involved herein" for "$20,000,000 (October 1983 price levels)".
### §312. Machinery, material, equipment, or supplies from other Government agencies

An officer of the Government having machinery, material, equipment, or supplies for printing, binding, and blank-book work, including lithography, photolithography, and other processes of reproduction, no longer required or authorized for the service of such officer, shall submit a detailed report of them to the Director of the Government Publishing Office. The Director of the Government Publishing Office, with the approval of the Joint Committee on Printing, may requisition such articles as are serviceable in the Government Publishing Office, and they shall be promptly delivered to that office.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1242; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), (c)(1), (i)(8), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537, 2539.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §59 (July 19, 1919, ch. 24, §3, 41 Stat. 233).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(i)(8), substituted "the service of such officer" for "his service".

Pub. L. 113–235, §1301(c)(1), substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of this title.
(October 20, 1960)

#### Esther Koschitzki, Respondent, v. Chaskiel Koschitzki, Appellant.

— • Motion by appellant for a stay pending appeal, granted on the following conditions: (a) that, commencing as of September 16, 1960, appellant shall pay to respondent the sum of $50 weekly on account of the alimony *pendente*lite; (b) that, within five days after entry of the order hereon, appellant shall pay $200 on account of the counsel fee; and (c) that appellant be ready to argue or submit the appeal on November 10, 1960. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said date. On the court’s own motion, the appeal will be heard on the original papers and on typewritten briefs. The parties are directed to file six copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other. The appellant’s typewritten brief must be served and filed on or before November 1, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Mary Alice P. Isachsen et al., as Coexecutrices of Azelie H. Phelps, Deceased.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Decree unanimously re*990versed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Onondaga County Surrogate’s Court for further proceedings in accordance with same memorandum as in *Hamar v Isachsen,*(58 AD2d 988). (Appeal from decree of Onondaga Surrogate’s Court—attorney’s fees, etc.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Goldman, JJ.
NO. C 09-02712 RS 

STANDBY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

*E-Filed 8/25/10* 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

MAHBOD KHALILPOUR, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-02712 RS

STANDBY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

 The Court has been informed that the above-entitled action has settled. Accordingly, the 

Court vacates all pretrial and trial dates. The parties are required to file a stipulation of dismissal by, 

October 28, 2010. If a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by that date, the parties are ordered to 

appear on November 4, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor of the San Francisco 

Courthouse and show cause why the case should not be dismissed. 

Case 3:09-cv-02712-RS Document 40 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2
NO. C 09-02712 RS 

STANDBY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 8/25/10 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-02712-RS Document 40 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 401.471 HUD payment of a section 541(b) claim.

HUD will pay a section 541(b) claim from the appropriate insurance fund to the insured mortgagee on behalf of the mortgagor. The mortgagee must use the claim payment to prepay the principal balance of the insured mortgage, in whole or in part, as provided in the Restructuring Plan. All section 541(b) claims will be paid in cash. Part 207 of this title and sections 207(g) and 541(a) of the NA do not apply to a section 541(b) claim.
§ 35.1210 Notices and pamphlet. ( a ) *Notice.* In cases where evaluation or paint stabilization is undertaken, the owner shall provide a notice to residents in accordance with § 35.125. A visual assessment alone is not considered an evaluation for purposes of this part.
( b ) *Lead hazard information pamphlet.* The owner shall provide the lead hazard information pamphlet in accordance with § 35.130.
[64 FR 50216, Sept. 15, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 34273, June 21, 2004]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                              |  |                       |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/    JOSEPH E. ROBERT,
JR.
|Dated: March 31, 2009 |  | Name:                        |  | Joseph E. Robert, Jr.
|                      |  |                              |  | Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board