alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### E. F. McCarty, appellee, v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, appellant.

Assumpsit for damages for failing to deliver carload of apples within reasonable time. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jasper county; the Hon. Thomas M. Jett, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Kasserman & Kasserman, for appellant. John G. Drennan and E. A. Smith, of counsel. Albert E. Isley, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Henry W. Pfaff, appellee, v. Frank E. Lackowski, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,373.

Claim for commission for procuring business of rent collecting. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 26, 1923.

Ziv, Loomis & Silvertrust, for appellant. A. S. and E. W. Froehlich, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unifrax Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, such officers' knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
               expressed in the Report.



Date:   04/24/03            By:  /s/  William P. Kelly
     ------------           --------------------------------------------
                                      William P. Kelly
                                      Chief Executive Officer



                            By:  /s/  Mark D. Roos
                            --------------------------------------------
                                      Mark D. Roos
                                      Chief Financial Officer


          A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Unifrax Corporation and will be retained by Unifrax Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       21
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6309

KEVIN ALEXANDER MOSS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2884-S)

Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Alexander Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting in part, and rejecting in part, the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Moss v. Waters, No.

CA-95-2884-S (D. Md. Feb. 14, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
### §8146. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for carrying out the purposes of this subchapter not to exceed $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1979, and not to exceed $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1980. Any amounts appropriated under this section shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 95–557, title VIII, §807, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2124; Pub. L. 96–153, title I, §108, Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1105.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1979—Pub. L. 96–153 reduced authorization of appropriation for fiscal year 1980 from "$10,000,000" to "$5,000,000".
§ 245.205 Efforts to obtain assistance. ( a ) Mortgagors subject to the requirements of this subpart shall not interfere with the efforts of tenants to obtain rent subsidies or other public assistance.
( b ) A mortgagor subject to the requirements of this subpart who is a party to a rent supplement contract under section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 (12 U.S.C. 1701s), a rental assistance payments contract under part 236, subpart D, of this chapter, or a Housing Assistance Payments Contract under 24 CFR part 886 shall not refuse to make assistance under such contract available to an existing tenant who is eligible therefor, provided that sufficient contract and budget authority and contract units are available under the contract. However, this provision shall not be deemed to require the mortgagor to give priority in the allocation of any such available assistance to an existing tenant instead of an eligible applicant on the mortgagor's waiting list or otherwise to supersede tenant selection procedures which are not otherwise inconsistent with applicable program regulation or instructions.
( c ) Subject to the provisions of any contract made in connection with the purchase of a multifamily housing project owned by the Secretary, this section shall not be deemed to require a mortgagor subject to the requirement of this subpart to enter into a Housing Assistance Payments Contract pursuant to 24 CFR part 982 for the benefit of an existing tenant who obtains a Certificate of Family Participation.
[48 FR 28437, June 22, 1983. Redesignated at 50 FR 32403, Aug. 12, 1985, as amended at 61 FR 57961, Nov. 8, 1996]
### §385c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, which related to tuition charge per pupil, was from the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1949, act June 29, 1948, ch. 754, 62 Stat. 1125, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.
#### Universal Vending Service Company, appellee, v. Nick Decaova, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,594.

Consolidated with No. 28,578 ante. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. *617Heard in the second division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Per Curiam.
|     |                                                                                                                                                  |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|     |                                                                                                                                                      |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | March 5, 2020 |   | By: | /s/ David Simmons |
|   |   |   |   | David Simmons |
|   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
|   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
#### § 3285.406 Flood hazard areas.

Refer to § 3285.302 for anchoring requirements in flood hazard areas.
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.64 Passport requirements. ( a ) *Passport defined. Passport,* as defined in INA 101(a)(30), is not limited to a national passport or to a single document. A passport may consist of two or more documents which, when considered together, fulfill the requirements of a passport, provided that documentary evidence of permission to enter a foreign country has been issued by a competent authority and clearly meets the requirements of INA 101(a)(30).
( b ) *Passport validity requirements.* Except as provided in § 42.2, every applicant for an immigrant visa shall present a passport, as defined in INA 101(a)(30), that is valid for at least 60 days beyond the period of validity of the visa. The 60-day additional validity requirement does not apply to an applicant who would be excepted as provided in § 42.2 were it not for the fact that the applicant is applying in the country of which the applicant is a national and the possession of a passport is required for departure. Such an applicant may be issued a visa valid for 6 months or for such shorter period as will assure its expiration in unison with the passport.
( c ) *A single passport including more than one person.* The passport requirement of this section may be met by the presentation of a passport including more than one person, if such inclusion is authorized under the laws or regulations of the issuing authority and if a photograph of each person 16 years of age or over is attached to the passport by the issuing authority.
[52 FR 42613, Nov. 5, 1987; 53 FR 9112, Mar. 21, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 48578, Sept. 11, 1998]
### §2101. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) "Presidential archival depository" means an institution operated by the United States to house and preserve the papers and books of a President or former President of the United States, together with other historical materials belonging to a President or former President of the United States, or related to his papers or to the events of his official or personal life, and may include research facilities and museum facilities in accordance with this chapter;

(2) "historical materials" including books, correspondence, documents, papers, pamphlets, works of art, models, pictures, photographs, plats, maps, films, motion pictures, sound recordings, and other objects or materials having historical or commemorative value;

(3) "Archivist" means the Archivist of the United States appointed under section 2103 of this title; and

(4) "Administration" means the National Archives and Records Administration established under section 2102 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1287; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §102(b), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2282; Pub. L. 99–323, §2, May 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 495.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §397(j) (June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title V, §507, as added Sept. 5, 1950, ch. 849, §6(d), 64 Stat. 583, and amended July 12, 1962, ch. 703, §1(o), (p), 66 Stat. 594; July 12, 1955, ch. 329, 69 Stat. 297; Aug. 12, 1955, ch. 859, 69 Stat. 695; July 3, 1956, ch. 513, §4, 70 Stat. 494; June 13, 1957, Pub. L. 85–51, 71 Stat. 69; Mar. 15, 1958, Pub. L. 85–341, §1(1), 72 Stat. 34).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Par. (1). Pub. L. 99–323 inserted ", and may include research facilities and museum facilities in accordance with this chapter" after "or personal life".

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "this chapter" for "sections 2103–2113 of this title", designated two existing paragraphs as pars. (1) and (2), respectively, and added pars. (3) and (4).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
Ground-Water Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program 

***By*Justin Kulongoski  and  Kenneth Belitz**

 

 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Errata Sheet for GAMA Fact Sheet 2004-3088 Version 1.1 

Revised January 2006

 

Sacramento, California 2004

 

In cooperation with the

State Water Resources Control Board

----

Complete accessible text of Fact Sheet   (2.58 MB PDF)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VITECH
AMERICA, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         827,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               61,077,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,403,197
<INVENTORY>                                 22,805,019
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            93,558,152
<PP&E>                                      97,956,060
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,535,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             160,675,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       85,866,841
<BONDS>                                      1,914,804
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    92,314,587
<OTHER-SE>                                 (48,651,195)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               160,675,172
<SALES>                                     84,466,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,466,074
<CGS>                                       53,550,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,381,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,018,829
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,358,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,349,674
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,349,674
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Dynamic Spectrum Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 23, 2020, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Dynamic Spectrum Alliance, 
Inc. (``DSA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, The University of York, Heslington, UNITED KINGDOM; 
Amazon, Sunnyvale, CA; and Google, Mountain View, CA have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DSA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 1, 2020, DSA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
September 18, 2020 (85 FR 58390).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-26362 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARYLON M. BOYD SBN #139642

LAW OFFICES OF MARYLON M. BOYD

2201 Broadway Street, Suite 815

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 663-8772

Facsimile: (510) 663-8781

lawofficeofmarylonboyd@yahoo.com

Attorney for Claimant

JOANNE CONWRIGHT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNE CONWRIGHT

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND; RAY DERANIA;

ANTOINETTE RENWICK; JEFFREY 

ROBINSON; CHERYL HALL

TONGUE;

AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5

Defendants

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C09 2572 TEH

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

DATE: APRIL 26, 2010

TIME: 1:30 P.M.

COURTROOM: 12, 19 FLR TH

GOOD CAUSE appearing the case management conference currently scheduled in this

matter is continued. to June 21, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. 

Dated:________ __________________________________

Judge Thelton Henderson

Senior Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

04/20/10

Case 3:09-cv-02572-TEH Document 18 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 1
IB 

Union Calendar No. 110

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3020

[Report No. 109–176] 

To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2005

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 19, 2005

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL

To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Parole 

5 Commission Extension and Sentencing Commission Au6 thority Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 3020 RH 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXISTENCE OF THE PAROLE COM2 MISSION. 

3 For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Re4 form Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 2032) as such section relates 

5 to chapter 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the 

6 United States Parole Commission, each reference in such 

7 section to ‘‘eighteen years’’ or ‘‘eighteen-year period’’ shall 

8 be deemed a reference to ‘‘21 years’’ or ‘‘21-year period’’, 

9 respectively. 

10 SEC. 3. PROVISION OF EMERGENCY AMENDMENT AUTHOR11 ITY FOR SENTENCING COMMISSION. 

12 In accordance with the procedure set forth in section 

13 21(a) of the Sentencing Act of 1987 (Public Law 100–

14 182), as though the authority under that Act had not ex15 pired, the United States Sentencing Commission shall—

16 (1) not later than 60 days after the date of the 

17 enactment of this Act, amend the Federal sentencing 

18 guidelines, commentary, and policy statements to 

19 implement section 6703 of the Intelligence Reform 

20 and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 

21 108–458); and 

22 (2) not later than 180 days after the date of 

23 the enactment of this Act, amend the Federal sen24 tencing guidelines, commentary, and policy state25 ments to implement section 3 of the Anabolic Ster26 oid Control Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–358). 

Union Calendar No. 110

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3020

[Report No. 109–176] 

A BILL

To extend the existence of the Parole Commission, 

and for other purposes. 

JULY 19, 2005

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Hi, 

·. Adams, Kevin (OST) 

. Friday, April 05, 2013 9:18 AM 

Tatitlek IRA Council/Tribal Administrator; Alaska DOT, Steven D. Hatter 

'; AlaskaAirTransit@alaska.net; Alaska DOT, Richard Sewell; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante 

; Reeve Air Alaska, Mike Reeve; Security Aviation, Jason Ward ; USPS, Joe McDonald; 

USPS, Lochmann, Robert 

Request for Comments regarding proposals for EAS at Tatilek, AK 

Proposal of Alaska Air Transit.pdf; Proposal of Reeve Air Alaska.pdf; Proposal of Security 

Avaition.pdf 

Attached above are copies of the three timely-filed proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Tatitlek. We are currently 

reviewing those proposals. These proposals are directly from the carriers and will soon be reflected in the Docket, 

which you may access through Regualtions.gov at DOT-OST-2013-0030, along with other pertinent information on this 

proceeding. Community comments, especially of village officials, are a critically important element in our carrierselection decision. We ask that you get back to us, preferably by email, no later than May 2, 2013. We will docket this 

email, as well as any replies. 

In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have any questions, call any ofthe three carriers or me, and get back to us by 

the deadline, May 2. 

Best, 

Kevin Adams 

Industry Economist 

202-366-1047 

1
**Exhibit 13**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

 

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),each of the undersigned officers of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:**

 

**Theannual report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,2008 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for theperiods referred to in the Form 20-F.**

 

 
|                       | /s/ Gerardo de Nicolás Gutiérrez |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Dated: June 29,  2009 | Gerardo de Nicolás  Gutiérrez    |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer                    |
|                       |                                       |
|                       | /s/  Carlos Moctezuma  Velasco        |
| Dated: June 29,  2009 | Carlos Moctezuma Velasco                   |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer                    |

 

**A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----