alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernard Conti, Appellant.

In a filiation proceeding under the Domestic Relations Law, defendant appeals: (1) from an order of filiation and support of the Children’s Court, Westchester County, made against him on February 5, 1960, after a nonjury trial; and (2) from an order of said court, made January 5, 1960, denying his motion to reopen the trial. After a trial, at which defendant elected not to testify, the court rendered its decision on June 30, 1959, holding defendant to be the father of the child in question. Thereafter, on September 24, 1959, defendant moved to reopen the trial for the purpose of receiving his and other testimony that might affect the credibility of the complainant. This motion was denied and the order of filiation and support was thereafter entered. Order of filiation and support affirmed, without .costs. The question of credibility of witnesses was for the trial court *(People*v. *Bitterbuseh,*283 App. Div. 1098). The order of filiation and .support here is amply sustained by the evidence. Appeal from order denying motion to reopen the trial, dismissed, without costs. Said order is not appealable (ef. *Soognamiglio*v. *Consolidated Edison Co. of N. T.,*6 A D 2d 722, 723; ef. *Grippo*v. *Pi Vito,*7 A D 2d 913; *People*v. *Giordano,*9 A D 2d 780). If it were appealable, however, we would affirm it because, under the circumstances here, we believe that the denial of the motion is a proper exercise of discretion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 306.7 Review of allegations of retaliation. ( a ) An aggrieved party, his or her representative, or a witness who alleges retaliation in connection with the presentation of a complaint under this part, may, if covered by this Part, request in writing that the allegation be reviewed as an act of discrimination subject to the procedures described in subpart B or that the allegation be considered as an issue in the complaint at hand. The determination whether to consider the complaint in the same or a separate proceeding is within the discretion of the OCRD Director.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK FAHY,

Plaintiff,    v.

ORPHEOS TARBOX, et al.,

Defendants                                                                      /

No. C-09-1420 MMC

ORDER ADVANCING FROM FEBRUARY19, 2010 TO FEBRUARY 12, 2010HEARING ON DEFENDANT STEINER’SMOTION TO REFER LITIGANT TOFEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT

On January 6, 2010, plaintiff Frank Fahy (“Fahy”) filed a “Motion for Order Vacating

Settlement With Defendant Alec Steiner,” which motion, pursuant to the Court’s order of

January 7, 2010, is set for hearing on February 12, 2010.

On January 13, 2010, defendant Alec Steiner (“Steiner”) filed a “Motion to Refer

Litigant to Federal Pro Bono Project and Stay Proceedings Pending Appointment of

Counsel,” which motion is presently set for hearing on February 19, 2010.

In the interests of judicial economy, the Court hereby ADVANCES the hearing on

Steiner’s motion from February 19, 2010 to February 12, 2010.  The date for Steiner to file

any reply to Fahy’s opposition remains February 5, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  February 1, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01420-MMC   Document 92   Filed 02/01/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T23:20:47-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### **CHAPTER 23—GRANTS OF SWAMP AND OVERFLOWED LANDS**

Sec.
981.
Indemnity to States on sale of lands.
982.
Grant to States to aid in construction of levees and drains.
983.
Lists and plats of lands, for governors of States.
984.
Legal subdivisions mostly wet and unfit for cultivation.
985.
Omitted.
986.
Selection of lands confirmed.
987.
Lands to be certified to State within one year.
988.
Act extended to Minnesota and Oregon.
989.
Homestead entries by purchasers from Missouri of lands declared not to be swamp lands.
990.
Grant to Missouri.
991.
Title of purchasers of unconfirmed lands in Arkansas confirmed.
992.
Sale of erroneously designated water-covered areas in Arkansas.
993.
Sale of lands in Louisiana; preference rights; application for purchase; appraisal; payment for land.
994.
Sale of lands in Wisconsin.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28305]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) Update 
on Roads Analysis, (5) Web site Update, (6) Water Assessment on Stony 
Creek, (7) General Discussion, (8) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 24, 2005, from 1:30 p.m. and 
end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988. 
Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their 
names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., 
Willows, CA 95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9b9b9d9898959295bc9a8fd29a9998d2898f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4a3a3a5a0a0adaaad84a2b7eaa2a1a0eab1b7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by January 21, 2005, will have 
the opportunity to address the Committee at those sessions.

    Dated: December 21, 2004.
Robert McCabe,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 04-28305 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Wednesday, May 16, 2012

US Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M

- 30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140 1200 New

Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 2059 0
To Whom It May Concern: Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. is requesting an extension to the exemption from Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 137.53(c)(2). This exemption is based on being in the public’s best interest to not jettison spray loads over congested areas and the ability to show an equivalent level of safety with not in stalling a jettison system. Thank you very much for your attention to this. If you need any additional information, or have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely,

Michael O. Rosolina Flight Operations Manager

– Aerial Application D ynamic Aviation Group, Inc. P.O. Box 7 Bridgewater, VA 22812 Phone: (540) 828

- 6070 Fax: (540) 828

- 4031 mrosolina@dynamicaviation.com
### Spatial data for Eurycea salamander habitats associated With three aquifers in south-central Texas

By: Franklin T. HeitmullerBrian D. Reece

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds243

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Eurycea salamander taxa comprise 12 known species that inhabit springs and caves in south-central Texas. Many of these are threatened or endangered species, and some are found only at one location. A number of the neotenic salamanders might be at risk from habitat loss associated with declines in ground-water levels. Eurycea salamander habitats are associated with three aquifers in south-central Texas: (1) the Edwards-Trinity (Plateau) aquifer, (2) the Edwards (Balcones Fault Zone) aquifer, and (3) the Trinity aquifer. The Edwards (Balcones fault zone) aquifer is commonly separated into three segments: from southwest to northeast, the San Antonio segment, the Barton Springs segment, and the northern segment. The Trinity aquifer south of the Colorado River can be divided into three permeable zones, the upper, middle, and lower zone. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, developed this report (geodatabase) to aggregate the spatial data necessary to assess the potential effects of ground-water declines on known Eurycea habitat locations in south-central Texas. The geodatabase provides information about spring habitats, spring flow, cave habitats, aquifers, and projected water levels.
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                    |                                                              |                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Dated                this 31st                day                of January, 2007. | By:                                                     | /s/                Liang Zhang |
|                                                                                    | Liang                Zhang Chief                Executive Officer |

----
### §7262. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–206, title V, §502, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3002

Section, Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §652, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 601, authorized Secretary to accept gifts, bequests, and devises of property for purpose of aiding or facilitating work of Department.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 104–206, which directed the repeal of 42 U.S.C. 7262, was executed by repealing section 652 of Pub. L. 95–91, which was classified to this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
# S&E Degrees, By Race/Ethnicity of Recipients

This series provides time series information on the number of bachelor's, master's and doctoral degrees awarded by U.S. institutions, by major field of degree and by race/ethnicity and sex of degree recipient.
Interactive Data Tool
          - Products
          - Sources

#### Most recent data year

            - Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race and Ethnicity of Recipients: 2008–18		Data Tables |			June 8, 2020 	 
            - Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race and Ethnicity of Recipients: 2005–15		Data Tables |			February 3, 2020 	 
            - Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 2002–12(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 15-321 | May 21, 2015 	 
            - Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity: 1997–2006(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 10-300 | November 4, 2009 	 
            - Science and Engineering Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1995-2004(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 07-308 | January 11, 2007 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1992 - 2001(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 04-318 | May 17, 2004 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1991-2000(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 02-329 | August 1, 2002 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1990-98(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 01-327 | June 1, 2001 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1989-97(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 00-311 | March 24, 2000 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1989-96(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 99-332 | January 14, 1999 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1989-95(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 97-334 | February 17, 1998 	 
            - S&E Bachelor's Degrees Awarded to Women Increase Overall, but Decline in Several Fields(A)		InfoBriefs |			NSF 97-326 | November 7, 1997 	 
            - S&E Degrees, by Race/Ethnicity of Recipients: 1987-94(A)		Detailed Statistical Tables |			NSF 96-329 | January 24, 1997 	 
            - Bachelor's Degrees Awarded To Racial/Ethnic Minorities In S&E Increase From 1990-1994(A)		InfoBriefs |			NSF 96-314 | November 18, 1996 	 

            - Survey of Earned Doctorates

(A):  Archived Publication

### Can't Find What You Are Looking For?

        -  Search NCSES  to find data and reports or browse  the Publication Index .						
        - See  permissions  for reuse of NCSES material.

Last Updated: May 21, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      47,090,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     206,662,005
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,578,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,984,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   219,628,535
<OTHER-SE>                                     950,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,984,968
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,256,606
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,785,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             338,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,321,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,321,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,321,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

<FN>
<F1>                                Current Assets and Current Liabilities
                                    are not separated to conform with
                                    industry standards.
<F2>                                Income is from rental income. There are
                                    no Sales or Cost of Goods Sold.
</FN>

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)    theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:  May 10, 2007 | /s/ ERICK  MASON        |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     | Erick Mason             |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 1007.20 Eligible housing. ( a ) A loan guaranteed under this part may only be made for one to four-family dwellings that are standard housing, in accordance with paragraph (b), of this section. The housing must be located on Hawaiian Home Lands for which a housing plan that provides for the use of loan guarantees under this part has been submitted and approved under part 1006 of this chapter.
( b ) Standard housing must meet housing safety and quality standards that: ( 1 ) Provide sufficient flexibility to permit the use of various designs and materials; and
( 2 ) Require each dwelling unit to: ( i ) Be decent, safe, sanitary, and modest in size and design;
( ii ) Conform with applicable general construction standards for the region in which the housing is located;
( iii ) Contain a plumbing system that: ( A ) Uses a properly installed system of piping;
( B ) Includes a kitchen sink and a partitional bathroom with lavatory, toilet, and bath or shower; and
( C ) Uses water supply, plumbing, and sewage disposal systems that conform to any minimum standards established by the applicable county or State;
( iv ) Contain an electrical system using wiring and equipment properly installed to safely supply electrical energy for adequate lighting and for operation of appliances that conforms to any appropriate county, State, or national code;
( v ) Be not less than the size provided under the applicable locally adopted standards for size of dwelling units, except that HUD, upon request of the DHHL may waive the size requirements under this paragraph; and
( vi ) Conform with the energy performance requirements for new construction established by HUD under section 526(a) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C.A. 1735f-4), unless HUD determines that the requirements are not applicable.
( c ) The relevant requirements of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851-4856), and implementing regulations at part 35, subparts A, B, and R of this title and §§ 200.805 and 200.810 of this title apply to housing eligible for a loan guaranteed under this part.
( d ) Housing that meets the minimum property standards for Section 247 mortgage insurance (12 U.S.C. 1715z-12) is deemed to meet the required housing safety and quality standards.
[67 FR 40776, June 13, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 66985, Nov. 28, 2003]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3141 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3141

  To direct the President to terminate the designation of Brazil as a 
beneficiary developing country for purposes of title V of the Trade Act 
                                of 1974.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the President to terminate the designation of Brazil as a 
beneficiary developing country for purposes of title V of the Trade Act 
                                of 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF BRAZIL AS A BENEFICIARY 
              DEVELOPING COUNTRY FOR PURPOSES OF TITLE V OF THE TRADE 
              ACT OF 1974.

    In accordance with subsections (d) and (f)(2) of section 502 of the 
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(d) and (f)(2)), the President shall 
terminate the designation of Brazil as a beneficiary developing country 
for purposes of title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2461 et 
seq.; relating to generalized system of preferences), effective not 
later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2





Independent Accountant’s Report
 
 
 Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)
 One Wachovia Center
 301 South College Street, DC-7
 Charlotte, NC 28288
 
 U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)
 Corporate Trust Department
 100 Wall Street
 New York, NY 10005
 
 
 Re:
STRATSTrust For IBM Corporation Securities, Series 2004-7 (the “Trust”)
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
 
 We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank National Association, (the “Trustee” and Together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of June 15, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), in respect of the STRATS Trust For IBM Corporation Securities, Series 2004-7 (the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination.
 
 Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 /s/ Aston Bell, CPA
 
 New York, New York
 March 22, 2010