alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN MERCED KETCHUM,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00114-CR

Appeal from the

441st Judicial District Court

of Midland County, Texas

(TC# CR56387)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of 

conviction should be reformed to reflect the deletion of the imposition of $6,940.00 in attorney’s 

fees. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court as reformed. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Neurological Sciences and Disorders (NSD)—B, Member Conflict.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2020.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Rockville, MD 20852,                         *mirela.milescu@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 24, 2020. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2020-26366 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §451c. Cancellation of charges or liens; credits

(a) After his approval of any application for an exchange as provided in this subchapter, the Secretary may cancel and release, in whole or in part, any and all charges or liens against the entryman or against the relinquished farm unit which are within his administrative jurisdiction. In administering the provisions of this subsection the Secretary shall take into consideration other charges and liens and the rights and interests of other lien holders as to him may seem just and equitable.

(b) An entryman making an exchange under the provisions of this subchapter may be given credit by the Secretary upon any land development charges made by the United States in connection with the lieu farm unit for any such charges paid to the United States in connection with the original unit. A resident owner making an exchange under the provisions of this subchapter may, to the extent, to which he or, in the case of a widow, widower, heir, or devisee, his spouse or ancestor, as the case may be, has paid to the United States the purchase price of the original farm unit, be given credit by the Secretary upon the purchase price of his lieu farm unit; such credit may also be applied in the manner and circumstances provided in section 451b of this title upon irrigation construction charges for or properly assignable to his lieu farm unit.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §4, 67 Stat. 567.)
| 200 Witmer Road  -  P.O. Box 1015  -  Horsham, PA  19044-8015 GMAC **Commercial Mortgage******Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 ***********J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,******Series 2004-CIBC9***Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction, I hereby attest that: i.A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision. ii.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the period. iii.GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Master Servicer, has received no notice regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.  GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION /s/ Brian T. Stauffer Brian T. Stauffer Senior Vice President February 20, 2005 ************ |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

GUILLERMO BRUZON-GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D14-1442

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 18, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Mercedes L. Leon, Kissimmee, for Petitioner.

Pamela J. Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this op inion shall be filed with

the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in

Case No. 2013-CF-001741-A-O, in the Circuit Court in and for Os ceola County, Florida.

See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

LAWSON, EVANDER, and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Sixteenth census of the United States: 1940: population: the labor force(sample statistics): wage or salary income in 1939**
 
Parts: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.940-2:P 81/7
Item Number:0198 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001103801
 
August 7, 2019
(No. 83-CC-1878

#### Michael Lighter, Claimant, *v.*The State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 26, 1987.*

Francis Kaitis, for Claimant.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General (John Buckley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel), for Respondent.

POCH, J.

Claimant, a 14-year-old boy, alleges that on July 14, 1982, at about 4:30 p.m., he was injured while in the process of crossing Touhy Avenue from the north to the south side of the street. The complaint alleges that upon stepping from the curb, he stepped on top of the storm sewer and his right foot went through the top of the sewer because one of the grates had been removed. Claimant’s right leg was stuck into the sewer past his knee and he was unable to remove his leg on his own initiative. The police were called to the scene and they were unsuccessful in removing the boy’s leg. The Skokie Fire Department arrived at the scene and were finally able to remove the Claimant’s leg. Claimant was stuck in the sewer for approximately 30 minutes.

*98Claimant was taken to Skokie Valley Hospital where he was X-rayed and a brace was applied to the leg. At the time of his injury, Claimant had a summer job with Duffy & Quinn Construction Company at which job he was paid $3.35 an hour for 40 hours a week, or a total of $134.00 per week. Claimant was off work for approximately five weeks, resulting in a loss of $670.00. He also incurred a hospital bill which, including doctor’s services, amounted to $139.00.

Claimant testified he has made a complete recovery from his injuries.

It was established at the time of the hearing by the Commissioner that it was the duty of the State of Illinois to maintain the manhole cover in question and that there was a defect in said cover which resulted in Claimant’s injuries.

In situations such as this, this Court has held that it is the duty of the State of Illinois to maintain the manhole covers in a state of proper repair for the safety of persons and vehicles using the highway. *(Beil v. State,*21 Ill. Ct. Cl. 480; *Gouchot v. State,*21 Ill. Ct. Cl. 157; *Mayes v. State,*23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 93.) Such a defect, which is known or could have been ascertained by reasonable inspection, amounts to constructive notice, and the failure to replace or repair such defect amounts to negligence on the part of the State of Illinois.

The Court is of the opinion that Claimant acted in the way an ordinary 14-year-old would act in crossing the street where he did. The record is devoid of any evidence showing any contributory negligence on the part of Claimant.

The Court is of the opinion that the State is guilty of negligence and that said negligence caused the Claimant’s injury as set forth in the complaint.

*99The Court believes an award in the amount of two thousand ($2,000.00) dollars is a proper award in this matter. An award is hereby entered in that amount on behalf of Claimant.
### §1702. Superintendent of Documents; sale of documents

The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall appoint a competent person to act as Superintendent of Documents who shall be under the control of the Director of the Government Publishing Office.

When an officer of the Government having in his charge documents published for sale desires to be relieved of them, he may turn them over to the Superintendent of Documents, who shall receive and sell them under this section. Moneys received from the sale of documents shall be returned to the Director of the Government Publishing Office on the first day of each month and be covered into the Treasury monthly.

The Superintendent of Documents shall also report monthly to the Director of the Government Publishing Office the number of documents received by him and the disposition made of them. He shall have general supervision of the distribution of all public documents, and to his custody shall be committed all documents subject to distribution, excepting those printed for the special official use of the executive departments, which shall be delivered to the departments, and those printed for the use of the two Houses of Congress, which shall be delivered to the Senate Service Department and House of Representatives Publications Distribution Service and distributed or delivered ready for distribution to Members upon their order by the superintendents of the Senate Service Department and House Publications Distribution Service, respectively.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §§71, 73 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §61, 28 Stat. 610; June 25, 1910, ch. 384, §1, 36 Stat. 770; Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 770, §1(62), 60 Stat. 871).

This section incorporates only part of former section 73. The balance will be found in section 308 of the revision.

"House of Representatives Publications Distribution Service" is substituted for "House Folding Room" because of the change of name under authority of Public Law 88–652.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" wherever appearing.
#### § 266.20 Effect of amendments.

The Commissioner may amend the regulations in this part from time to time. Amendments to the regulations will not adversely affect the interest of a lender under a contract of insurance on any mortgage already insured or on any mortgage to be insured on which HUD has already issued its firm approval letter.

[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83440, Dec. 22, 2020]
§ 3.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 3.225 and 3.230, and §§ 3.300 through 3.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 3.300 through 3.310 .* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 3.300 through 3.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 3.300 through 3.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 3.300 through 3.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 3.300 through 3.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 3.300 through 3.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATY SULLIVAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-09-2161 EMC

ORDER CONTINUING OSC HEARING

In July 2014, at a case management conference, this Court scheduled an order-to-show-cause

(“OSC”) hearing in the above-referenced case. See Docket No. 127 (minutes). Based on the parties’

representations that the case was in the process of settling, the Court continued the OSC hearing

three times. See Docket Nos. 129, 131, 134 (orders). Currently, the OSC hearing is set for January

29, 2015.

The parties have orally notified the Court that the settlement is expected to be completed

forthwith. In light of that representation, the Court is willing to continue the OSC hearing one final

time. Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the OSC hearing from January 29 to February

5, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. There shall be no further continuances. 

If the settlement papers are not signed by February 4, 2015, then, Defendant JP Morgan

Chase Bank must have a representative make a personal appearance at the February 5 OSC hearing.

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 136 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Such representative must have full settlement authority and must be prepared to explain why the

settlement papers have not been completed and/or signed. The Court advises Chase – as well as all

other parties – that it risks being sanctioned if it cannot substantially justify its conduct to date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 23, 2015

_________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 136 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2
#### § 232.2 License.

The Commissioner shall not insure any mortgage under this part unless the facility is regulated by the State, municipality or other political subdivision in which the facility is or is to be located, and the appropriate agency for such jurisdiction provides a license, certificate or other assurances the Commissioner considers necessary, that the facility complies with any applicable State or local standards and requirements for such facility.
§ 35.615 Notices and pamphlet. ( a ) *Notice.* If evaluation or hazard reduction is undertaken, the sponsor shall provide a notice to occupants in accordance with § 35.125. A visual assessment alone is not considered an evaluation for the purposes of this part.
( b ) *Lead hazard information pamphlet.* The sponsor shall provide the lead hazard information pamphlet in accordance with § 35.130.
[64 FR 50209, Sept. 15, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 34272, June 21, 2004]
**EXHIBIT 10.17**

 

**New York Community Bancorp, Inc.**

**615 Merrick Avenue**

**Westbury, New York 11590**

 

June 27, 2003 

 

Nancy C. MacKenzie 

The Roslyn Savings Bank 

One Jericho Plaza 

Jericho, New York 11753-8905 

 

Dear Nancy: 

 

I am pleased tohave this opportunity to set forth in writing certain additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan ofMerger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the HoldingCompany. 

 

At such time as you become an employee of the Bankunder your new employment agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $650,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employmentafter the Effective Time other than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-dayperiod, you will immediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period andthe denominator of which is 365. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the MergerAgreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 

 

Pleaseacknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 

 

Sincerely,

Joseph R. Ficalora

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Acknowledged and Agreed:

/s/ Nancy C. MacKenzie

Nancy C. MacKenzie

 

2
#### § 242.33 Covenant for malpractice, fire, and other hazard insurance.

The mortgage shall contain a covenant binding the mortgagor to maintain adequate liability, fire, and extended coverage insurance on the property. The mortgage shall also contain a covenant binding the mortgagor to maintain adequate malpractice coverage. All coverage shall be acceptable to the mortgagee or HUD.

[73 FR 35923, June 25, 2008]
### §390qq. Isolated tracts

Neither the ownership limitations of this subchapter nor the ownership limitations of any other provision of Federal reclamation law shall apply to lands which are isolated tracts found by the Secretary to be economically farmable only if they are included in a larger farming operation but which may, as a result of their inclusion in that operation, cause it to exceed such ownership limitations.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §217, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1270.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Federal reclamation law, referred to in text, is defined in section 390aa of this title.
#### Jacob Farrington, Respondent, *v.*Cynthia A. Bundy et al., Appellants

(Argued November 22, 1881;

decided November 29, 1881.)

*L. L. Bundy*for appellants,

*E. Cowni/ryma/n*for respondent.

Agree to dismiss appeal without opinion.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.