alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Solo Cup Company (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Koney, Jr., as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert D. Koney, Jr.                            
|Robert D. Koney, Jr.                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)        
|March 25, 2010                                      

The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 31
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Moshe Zarmi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinking Tools,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely effect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and


<PAGE>

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.

Dated: February 12, 2004
                                            By: Moshe Zarmi
                                            Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                            Title: President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer and
                                                   principal accounting officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. 08-30468

)

Plaintiff – Appellee, ) D.C. No. 3:08-CR-00007-JKS

)

v. ) MEMORANDUM*

)

IMAD SALIM HEREIMI, )

)

Defendant – Appellant. )

 )

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

After a jury verdict, the district court issued a judgment of conviction against

Hereimi for honest services fraud. We affirmed the district court, but the Supreme

Court vacated our decision and remanded “for further consideration in light of

Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. ___, [130 S. Ct. 2896] (2010).” Having done

so, it is apparent to us that this case was tried and argued to the jury solely on the

FILED

SEP 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

theory of honest services fraud that was rejected in Skilling. See id. at ___, 130 S.

Ct. at 2931; see also McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 360, 107 S. Ct. 2875,

2882, 97 L. Ed. 2d 292 (1987) (conviction reversed where “there was no charge

and the jury was not required to find that the [State] itself was defrauded of any

money or property.”) Moreover, the jury was instructed and brought in a verdict

on that theory alone. Therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand to the district

court for further proceedings. See United States v. Moreland, 604 F.3d 1058,

1076–78 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 468, 117

S. Ct. 1544, 1549, 137 L. Ed. 2d 718 (1997) (where at time of trial law “settled and

clearly contrary to the law at time of appeal,” error still plain); United States v.

Hilling, 891 F.2d 205, 206–08 (9th Cir. 1989) (when jury instructed on improper

intangible right theory, conviction reversed).

REVERSED and REMANDED.
August 1,2013

Notice of

SkyWest Airlines, Inc.

Intent to terminate United Express

Service at Cody, WY

Pursuant to Title 49

U.S. Code, Section 41734

""f'I' l.!:' J P I: liS

Pursuant to Title 49 of the U.S. Code, Section 41734, SkyWest Airlines, Inc. hereby

serves notice of intent to discontinue the United Express service from Cody, Wyoming to

Denver, Colorado effective November 1,2013.

Sincerely,

Michael Thompson

Vice President - Market Development

SkyWest Airlines

444 South River Road

St. George, UT 84790
### §§390h–35 to 390h–37. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 390h–35, Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1652, as added Pub. L. 111–11, title IX, §9111(a)(1), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1317, which related to the Prado Basin natural treatment system project, was omitted pursuant to subsec. (e) of section, which provided that the section would have no effect after the date that was 10 years after Mar. 30, 2009.

Section 390h–36, Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1653, as added Pub. L. 111–11, title IX, §9111(b)(1), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1317, which related to the Lower Chino Dairy Area desalination demonstration and reclamation project, was omitted pursuant to subsec. (e) of section, which provided that the section would have no effect after the date that was 10 years after Mar. 30, 2009.

Section 390h–37, Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1654, as added Pub. L. 111–11, title IX, §9113(a), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1319, which related to the Oxnard, California, water reclamation, reuse, and treatment project, was omitted pursuant to subsec. (d) of section, which provided that the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to carry out any provisions of section terminated 10 years after Mar. 30, 2009.
### §9820. Grants to plan economic development and cooperative programs

In order to facilitate the purposes of this subchapter, the Secretary is authorized to provide financial assistance to any public or private nonprofit agency or organization for planning of community economic development programs and cooperative programs under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §631, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 498.)
### §385a. Payments to school districts for education of dependents of construction personnel; cooperative arrangements; chargeable to project

The Secretary of the Interior, giving due consideration to the temporary nature of the requirements therefor, is authorized to make such provision as he deems to be necessary and in the public interest for the education of dependents of persons employed on the actual construction of projects or features of projects, by the Bureau of Reclamation, in any cases in which he finds that by reason of such construction activity, an undue burden is, or will be cast upon the facilities of the public-school districts serving the areas in which construction is being undertaken, and to pay for the same from any funds available for the construction of said projects: Provided, That the Secretary of the Interior shall enter into cooperative arrangements with local school districts wherein such features are situated to contribute toward covering the cost of furnishing the educational services required for such dependents, or for the operation by those school districts of Government facilities, or for the expansion of local school facilities. Such cost incurred hereunder shall be charged to the project concerned and shall be repayable in the same manner and to the same extent as are its other costs of construction.

(June 29, 1948, ch. 733, §1, 62 Stat. 1108.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.101 Generally.

Procedures that apply to the formulation, issuance, amendment, and revocation of rules pursuant to the Act are governed by the Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 *et seq.,* and part 10 of this title, except that the Secretary shall respond to a petition for rulemaking by an interested party within 180 days of receipt of the petition.

[61 FR 10860, Mar. 15, 1996]
#### § 92.90 Delivering documents pertaining to the revocation of naturalization.

Officers of the Foreign Service shall deliver, or assist in delivering, to designated persons, documents relating to proceedings in the cancellation of certificates of naturalization when such documents are forwarded by duly authorized officials of the Federal courts. The responsibility for furnishing detailed instructions on the procedure to be followed in delivering such documents rests with the court or with the United States attorney concerned, and officers should follow such instructions carefully.
#### § 3286.403 Licensing requirements.

An installer of manufactured homes must comply with the licensing requirements set forth in subpart C of this part.
#### § 3285.104 Moving manufactured home to location.

Refer to § 3285.902 for considerations related to moving the manufactured home to the site of installation.
#### § 234.265 Contents of deed and supporting documents.

In addition to the requirements of § 203.367, incorporated by reference, the deed shall comply with the plan of apartment ownership. Any changes therein, including the administration of the property, shall require FHA approval.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 308

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CV-15-556

BRANDON MORIN

APPELLANT

V.

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF

HUMAN SERVICES

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered July 23, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE UNION

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. JV-2014-107]

HONORABLE EDWIN KEATON,

JUDGE

MOTION GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Brandon Morin, by and through his attorney, Thomas A. Potter, has filed

a motion for rule on clerk. The circuit court entered an order on March 19, 2015,

terminating Morin’s parental rights to his three minor children. Morin filed a notice of appeal

on March 26, 2015.

Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-9(d) (2014), in dependency-neglect cases,

the record shall be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court within seventy days of the filing

of the notice of appeal. Here, Attorney Potter tendered the record on June 24, 2015, twenty

days after it was due.

When an attorney candidly admits fault for failing to perfect an appeal, we will grant

the motion for rule on clerk, and a copy of the opinion will be forwarded to the Committee

on Professional Conduct. See McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004).

Attorney Potter states in the motion that he accepts full responsibility for failing to ensure that

the correct date was calculated for the record due date and for failing to timely lodge the
Cite as 2015 Ark. 308

record with the court. Accordingly, we grant the motion and forward a copy of this opinion

to the Committee. 

Motion granted. 

2
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Joseph
      Restivo, Chief Financial Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
      June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Joseph Restivo


Joseph
      Restivo


Chief
      Financial Officer




Dated:
      August 13, 2008
Exhibit 32

                             THINKING TOOLS, INC.
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinking Tools,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 (the "Report"),
the  undersigned  officer of the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

                  (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
         Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
         in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
         operations of the Company.

Dated: February 12, 2004

                                  By: Moshe Zarmi
                                      ------------------------
                                  Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and principal accounting officer
### §390hh. Operation and maintenance charges

#### (a) Price adequate to recover charges

The price of irrigation water delivered by the Secretary pursuant to a contract or an amendment to a contract with a district, as specified in section 390cc of this title, shall be at least sufficient to recover all operation and maintenance charges which the district is obligated to pay to the United States.

#### (b) Modification of price

Whenever a district enters into a contract or requests that its contract be amended as specified in section 390cc of this title, and each year thereafter, the Secretary shall calculate such operation and maintenance charges and shall modify the price of irrigation water delivered under the contract as necessary to reflect any changes in such costs by amending the district's contract accordingly.

#### (c) Districts not operating from Federal funds

This section shall not apply to districts which operate and maintain project facilities and finance the operation and maintenance thereof from non-Federal funds.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §208, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1267.)
#### § 203.9 Disclosure regarding interest due upon mortgage prepayment.

Each mortgagee with respect to a mortgage under this part shall at or before closing with respect to any such mortgage, provide the mortgagor with written notice in a form prescribed by the Commissioner describing any requirements the mortgagor must fulfill upon prepayment of the principal amount of the mortgage to prevent the accrual of any interest on the principal amount after the date of such prepayment. This paragraph shall apply to any mortgage executed after August 22, 1991, and before January 21, 2015.

[56 FR 18947, Apr. 24, 1991, as amended at 79 FR 50837, Aug. 26, 2014]
#### § 266.315 Recordkeeping requirements.

The mortgagor and the builder, if there is an identity of interest with the mortgagor, shall keep and maintain records of all costs of any construction or other cost items not representing work under the general contract and to make available such records for review by the HFA or HUD, if requested.
#### § 247.9 Applicability of procedures.

The procedures outlined in this subpart apply to all decisions to terminate the occupancy of a tenant by the termination of a lease prior to the end of its term or at the end of a term where the tenant resides in any multifamily project which is presently owned by HUD, regardless of whether said project was a subsidized project prior to the acquisition of title by HUD.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Daves of America, Inc. for the
quarter ended October 3, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Famous Daves of America, Inc.
 Dated:  November 5, 2010
    By:

/s/
Christopher ODonnellChristopher ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer) Dated:  November 5, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Diana Garvis PurcelDiana Garvis PurcelChief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) -32-
#### § 107.65 Referral to the Attorney General.

If the results of a complaint investigation or a compliance review demonstrate that any person, or specified class of persons, has violated E.O. 11063 or this part, and efforts to resolve the matter(s) by informal means have failed, the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO in appropriate cases shall recommend that the General Counsel refer the case to the Attorney General of the United States for appropriate civil or criminal action under section 303 of E.O. 11063.
### §1707. Reprinting of documents required for sale

The Superintendent of Documents may order reprinted, from time to time, public documents required for sale, subject to the approval of the Secretary or head of the department in which the public document originated. The Revolving Fund shall be reimbursed for the cost of reprints from the moneys received by the Superintendent of Documents from the sale of public documents.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1280; Pub. L. 101–520, title II, §208, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2274.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §79 (Mar. 28, 1904, No. 11, 33 Stat. 584).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–520 substituted "The Revolving Fund" for "The appropriation for printing and binding".
### §§357 to 360. Repealed. Pub. L. 88–417, §1, Aug. 11, 1964, 78 Stat. 389

Section 357, act Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §6, 41 Stat. 294, provided for disposition of land not included in patents.

Section 358, act Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §7, 41 Stat. 295, provided for payment of proceeds of land sales into reclamation fund.

Section 359, acts Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §8, 41 Stat. 295; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, provided for reservation to the United States of coal and mineral rights, and for disposition of such reserved rights.

Section 360, act Oct. 22, 1919, ch. 77, §9, 41 Stat. 295, authorized Secretary to prescribe rules and regulations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Sections repealed subject to valid rights and obligations existing on Aug. 11, 1964, see section 1 of Pub. L. 88–417, set out as a note under sections 351 to 355 of this title.

#### Processing of Pending Applications

Processing of applications filed prior to Aug. 11, 1964, to be in same manner as if Pub. L. 88–417 had not been enacted, see section 2 of Pub. L. 88–417, set out as a note under sections 351 to 355 of this title.
### §390h–12d. St. George Area Water Recycling Project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the appropriate State and local authorities, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of the St. George Area Water Recycling Project to reclaim and reuse water in the service area of the Washington County Water Conservancy District in Utah.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation or maintenance of a project described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1618, as added Pub. L. 104–266, §2(a)(2), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3291.)
#### § 92.17 Fastening of pages.

When the instrument or document to which a notarial act relates consists of more than one sheet, or when the notarial certificate will be attached and not written on the document itself, the notarizing officer should bring all the sheets comprising the document together under his official seal.

[22 FR 10858, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 60 FR 51723, Oct. 3, 1995]