alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §364a. Board on Geographic Names; establishment and membership; appointment and term of office

There is established a Board on Geographic Names, hereinafter called the Board. The membership of the Board shall include one representative from each of the Departments of State, Defense, Interior, Agriculture, and Commerce, and from the Government Publishing Office, the United States Postal Service, and the Library of Congress. The Board may also include representatives from such Federal agencies as the Secretary, upon recommendation of the Board, shall from time to time find desirable, even though these agencies are in the departments otherwise represented on the Board. The members of the Board shall be appointed by the respective heads of the departments or independent agencies that they represent. Each member shall be appointed for a two-year term but may be reappointed to successive terms. The members of the Board shall serve without additional compensation. The Board shall nominate a Chairman to be appointed by the Secretary, and shall establish such working committees as are found desirable.

(July 25, 1947, ch. 330, §2, 61 Stat. 456; Aug. 10, 1949, ch. 412, §4, 63 Stat. 579; Pub. L. 91–375, §§4(a), 6(o), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 773, 783; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(b), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1949—Act Aug. 10, 1949, established Department of Defense as an Executive Department and reduced Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force to status of military departments in Department of Defense.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Publishing Office" substituted for "Government Printing Office" in text on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.

"United States Postal Service" substituted for "Post Office Department" in text on authority of Pub. L. 91–375, §§4(a), 6(o), Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 773, 783, which are set out as notes preceding section 101 of Title 39, Postal Service, and under section 201 of Title 39, respectively, which abolished Post Office Department, transferred its functions to United States Postal Service, and provided that references in other laws to Post Office Department be considered a reference to United States Postal Service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         602032
<SECURITIES>                                   222258
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1476823
<PP&E>                                         121087
<DEPRECIATION>                                 27151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1598494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          68000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    30
<COMMON>                                       42735
<OTHER-SE>                                     1487729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1598494
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  370304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (376494)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (376,494)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (376,494)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)
        


</TABLE>
§ 220.800 Definitions. All of the definitions contained in § 220.550 shall apply to §§ 220.800 *et seq.* In addition the following terms shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Contract of insurance* means the agreement evidenced by the endorsement of the Commissioner upon the note given in connection with an insured loan, incorporating by reference the regulations in §§ 220.800 *et seq.* and the applicable provisions of the Act.
( b ) *Maturity* means the date on which the loan indebtedness would be extinguished if paid in accordance with periodic payments provided for in the loan.
Order entered August 6, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00579-CV

AIRPRO MOBILE AIR, LLC AND ARNOLD W. GARTMAN, Appellants

V.

PROSPERITY BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-05616

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ August 2, 2019 unopposed second motion to extend time 

to file brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than September 12, 

2019. We caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #14-2004 L.P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Nancy J.  McGurk,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Managing  General  Partner,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

                       /s/ Nancy J. McGurk
                       -------------------
                       Nancy J. McGurk
                       Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner
### §355a. Acceptance of claims for benefits

Whenever there is duly tendered to the Board, by any person, any claim for unemployment compensation pursuant to the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act [45 U.S.C. 351 et seq.], such claim shall be accepted by the Board without delay and appropriate administrative action for the allowance or disallowance of such claim shall be taken by the Board at the earliest practicable time.

(June 29, 1956, ch. 477, title V, §501, 70 Stat. 437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1938, ch. 680, 52 Stat. 1094, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 367 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of act June 29, 1956, popularly known as the Departments of Labor, and Health, Education, and Welfare, Appropriation Act, 1957, and not as a part of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act: Aug. 1, 1955, ch. 437, title V, §501, 69 Stat. 411.
### §1612. Surveys

#### (a) Areas for conveyance to Village Corporations; monumentation of exterior boundaries; meanderable water boundaries exempt from requirement; land occupied as primary place of residence or business, or for other purposes and other patentable lands as subject to survey

The Secretary shall survey the areas selected or designated for conveyance to Village Corporations pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. He shall monument only exterior boundaries of the selected or designated areas at angle points and at intervals of approximately two miles on straight lines. No ground survey or monumentation will be required along meanderable water boundaries. He shall survey within the areas selected or designated land occupied as a primary place of residence, as a primary place of business, and for other purposes, and any other land to be patented under this chapter.

#### (b) Withdrawals, selections, and conveyances pursuant to chapter: current plats of surveys or protraction diagrams; conformity to Land Survey System

All withdrawals, selections, and conveyances pursuant to this chapter shall be as shown on current plats of survey or protraction diagrams of the Bureau of Land Management, or protraction diagrams of the Bureau of the State where protraction diagrams of the Bureau of Land Management are not available, and shall conform as nearly as practicable to the United States Land Survey System.

(Pub. L. 92–203, §13, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 702.)
### §§821 to 835. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–558, §1, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246

Section 821, R.S. §2414, related to assignment of warrants and locations.

For savings provisions affecting this section, see Pub. L. 87–558, §1, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246, set out as a note preceding section 781 of this title.

Section 822, R.S. §2436, related to effect of certain written instruments affecting title to warrants prior to issuance of warrants.

Section 823, R.S. §2415, related to location of warrants, and to the payment of any excess value over minimum price.

Section 824, R.S. §2416, related to entry under warrants for services in Revolutionary War and in War of 1812.

Section 825, R.S. §2417, related to time for location of warrants for services in Revolutionary War and War of 1812.

Section 826, R.S. §2437, related to location of warrants free of expense.

Section 827, R.S. §2423, related to issuance of a patent on return of a warrant.

Section 828, R.S. §2439, permitted issuance of a patent notwithstanding loss of a warrant.

Section 829, R.S. §2441, related to assignment of a lost warrant.

Section 830, R.S. §2440, related to loss of or failure to issue a certificate of honorable discharge.

Section 831, R.S. §2443, related to mode of issuing patents to heirs of soldiers entitled to warrants.

Section 832, R.S. §2444; act July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §1, 46 Stat. 1016, related to death of claimant after establishing right to a warrant but prior to its issuance.

For savings provisions affecting this section, see Pub. L. 87–558, §1, July 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 246, set out as a note preceding section 781 of this title.

Section 833, R.S. §2445, related to right of legal representatives to file proofs for warrants.

Section 834, R.S. §2446, related to relocation of warrants in case of error.

Section 835, R.S. §457, related to issuance and recording of warrants.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York corporation, 

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

CHRISTIE, MANSON & WOODS, LTD., 

a United Kingdom corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

and ROES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-05445 WHA (Lead Case)

Consolidated with:

No. C 09-00471 WHA

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Based on the accompanying jury verdicts, judgment is hereby entered as follows: 

1. In Case No. 08-05445, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff

Halsey Minor and against defendant Christie’s Inc. in the total amount of

$8,570,001. 

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 183 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. In Case No. 08-05445, judgment is entered in favor of

counterclaimant Christie’s Inc. and against counterdefendant Halsey Minor in the

total amount of $417,000. 

3. In Case No. 09-00471, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff

Christie, Manson & Woods and against defendant Halsey Minor in the total

amount of $994,716.06.

4. As between the parties to this action, Halsey Minor has the

superior right to ownership and possession of the April artworks.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 183 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:09-cr-00033-WHA Document 69 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cr-00033-WHA Document 69 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 3
[PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

CR 13-0184 CW 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JEFFREY DAVID SCHINKEL, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR 09-0033 WHA

[PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER OF 

FORFEITURE

On July 06, 2015, the court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture forfeiting the following 

property: 

a. (1) one White Apple Mac Laptop, Serial No. W872479HTA3, 

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(a)(1) and (a)(3). 

The United States represents that it has complied with the publication notice requirements of the 

Preliminary Order and that no petitions have been filed. 

THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-described property shall be 

forfeited to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(a)(1) and (a)(3). 

All right, title, and interest in said property is vested in the United States of America. The appropriate 

federal agency shall dispose of the forfeited property according to law. 

Dated: _______________________________ 

 WILLIAM ALSUP

United States District Judge

September 28, 2015.

Case 3:09-cr-00033-WHA Document 69 Filed 09/28/15 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.360 PIA acceptance of product certification programs or listings.

In determining whether products to be included in a manufactured home are acceptable under the standards set out in part 3280 of 24 CFR, all PIAs shall accept all product verification programs, labelings, and listings unless the PIA has reason to believe that a particular certification is not acceptable, in which case, the PIA shall so inform the Secretary and provide the Secretary with full documentation and information on which it bases its belief. Pending a determination by the Secretary, the PIA shall provisionally accept the certification. The Secretary's determination shall be binding on all PIAs.
#### Almeda Peterson, appellee, v. Andrew Anderson, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,229.

Suit for room rent and board and attendance. Verdict for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Walter C. Frank, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed August 13, 1923.

Rehearing denied October 2, 1923.

R. C. Hunt, for appellant. J. E. Maley, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 266.410 Mortgage provisions. ( a ) *Form.* The mortgage and note must be executed on a form approved by the HFA for use in the jurisdiction in which the property is located.
( b ) *Mortgagor.* The mortgage must be executed by a mortgagor determined eligible by the HFA.
( c ) *First lien.* The mortgage must be a single first lien on property that has first priority for payment and that conforms with property standards prescribed by the HFA.
( d ) *Single asset mortgagor.* The mortgage must require that the mortgagor is a single asset mortgagor.
( e ) *Amortization.* The mortgage must provide for complete amortization (*i.e.,* be regularly amortizing) over the term of the mortgage. The complete amortization requirement does not apply to: ( 1 ) Construction loans, or
( 2 ) Level I participants where the loan has a minimum term of 17 years that would amortize over a maximum period of 40 years and the HFA's underwriting standards, loan terms and conditions, and asset management and servicing procedures have been approved by HUD.
( f ) *Use restrictions.* The mortgage must contain a covenant prohibiting the use of the property for any purpose other than the purpose intended on the day the mortgage was executed. The conversion of a project from rental to cooperative is not a “change in use” as that term is employed in the mortgage since the property will continue to have a residential use both before and after conversion.
( g ) *Hazard insurance.* The mortgage must contain a covenant, acceptable to the HFA, that binds the mortgagor to keep the property insured by one or more standard policies for fire and other hazards stipulated by the HFA. A standard mortgagee clause making loss payable to the HFA must be included in the mortgage. The HFA is responsible for assuring that insurance is maintained in force and in the amount required by this paragraph and the mortgage. The HFA must ensure that the insurance coverage is in an amount that will comply with the coinsurance clause applicable to the location and character of the property, but not less than 80 percent of the actual cash value of the insurable improvements and equipment. If the mortgagor does not obtain the required insurance, the HFA must do so and assess the mortgagor for such costs. These insurance requirements apply as long as the HFA retains an interest in the project and final claim settlement has not been completed or the contract of insurance has not been otherwise terminated.
( h ) *Modification of terms.* The mortgage must contain a covenant requiring that, in the event that the HFA and owner agree to a modification of the terms of the mortgage (*e.g.,* to reflect a reduction of the interest rate if reductions are realized in the underlying bond rates for the project), Section 8 rents would be reduced in accordance with HUD guidelines.
( i ) *Regulatory Agreement.* The mortgage must contain a provision incorporating the Regulatory Agreement by reference.
[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83444, Dec. 22, 2020]
#### § 60.112 Review by Institution

Research covered by this policy that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLISON C. PIERCE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02713 JSW

ORDER RE RELATEDNESS OF

CASES

Plaintiff has filed a notice of related cases, indicating that this matter is related to an

earlier case, Pierce v. Barnhart, Case No. C 00-0742 BZ. Although Judge Zimmerman had

denied the administrative motion to relate the cases in his low-numbered case, this Court would

find good cause to transfer this matter should Defendant consent to this matter being heard by

Judge Zimmerman. By no later than January 29, 2010, Defendant shall file a notice whether he

will or will not consent to the transfer of this matter to Magistrate Judge Zimmerman.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02713-JSW Document 19 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 1
### §46. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 12, 1949, ch. 680, title I, 63 Stat. 785, related to exchange of old freight carrying vehicles as part payment for new, was from the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1950, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

June 29, 1948, ch. 754, 62 Stat. 1133.

July 25, 1947, ch. 337, 61 Stat. 477.

July 1, 1946, ch. 529, 60 Stat. 369.

July 3, 1945, ch. 262, 59 Stat. 343.

June 28, 1944, ch. 298, 58 Stat. 491.

July 12, 1943, ch. 219, 57 Stat. 477.

July 2, 1942, ch. 473, 56 Stat. 537.

June 28, 1941, ch. 259, 55 Stat. 339.

June 18, 1940, ch. 395, 54 Stat. 439.

May 10, 1939, ch. 119, 53 Stat. 719.

May 9, 1938, ch. 187, 52 Stat. 325.

Aug. 9, 1937, ch. 570, 50 Stat. 598.

June 22, 1936, ch. 691, 49 Stat. 1785.

May 9, 1935, ch. 101, 49 Stat. 200.

Mar. 2, 1934, ch. 38, 48 Stat. 382.

Feb. 17, 1933, ch. 98, 47 Stat. 846.

Apr. 22, 1932, ch. 125, 47 Stat. 118.

Feb. 14, 1931, ch. 187, 46 Stat. 1147.

May 14, 1930, ch. 273, 46 Stat. 310.

Mar. 4, 1929, ch. 705, 45 Stat. 1594.

Mar. 7, 1928, ch. 137, 45 Stat. 231.

Jan. 12, 1927, ch. 27, 44 Stat. 961.

May 10, 1926, ch. 277, 44 Stat. 486.

Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1172.

June 5, 1924, ch. 264, 43 Stat. 419.

Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1208.

May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 586.
### §3789d. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3789d was editorially reclassified as section 10228 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
02/27/2013 14:10**F~X** 2024935142

February 15, 2013 Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430 &00 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building Suite 2W I000 Washington. DC 

### 20591 William Vines • .Esquire Oflice of Regional Counsel Southern Region .Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, 

### Georgia 30320 FAA

# <~-~j ..**~~** 

# ..... ""'II: I I.I..U. When experience matters.
2561 Rescue Way Rrooksville, FL 34604 PI I- 352-796-:2540 I FX

-**352-796~2549** -l- OMS ll!001/001 

# RECEIVED FEB 1 9 2013 

## HEARING DOCKET

"'"'""J



### REQUEST FOR HEARING ON FINAL NOTICE

### 0~"' PROPOSED

### PENAl~ TV 

### BY WORLDWIDE AIRCRAt"'T 

### SERVICESt INC. Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc. responds to the Final Notice of Proposed Civil penalty and denies the allegations 

### contained in the letter. As a result, Worldwide hereby requests a hearing on the Final Notice as setlbrth in the Final 

### Notice.

# ~~17~- M" hael Ifoncycutl President Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc.