alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard Blass, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                at the dates and for the periods
                indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.







Date:  November
      14, 2005











Richard
      Blass


*Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
### §1303. American Historical Association: report

In addition to the usual number of the report of the American Historical Association, five thousand five hundred copies shall be printed: one thousand for the Senate, two thousand for the House of Representatives, one thousand five hundred for distribution by the Association and the Smithsonian Institution, and one thousand copies for the use of the Association.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1266.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §243 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 616; May 25, 1900, No. 27, 31 Stat. 717).
#### § 221.770 Assignment option.

A mortgagee holding a conditional or firm commitment issued on or before November 30, 1983 (or, in the Direct Endorsement program, a property appraisal report signed by the mortgagee's approved underwriter on or before November 30, 1983) has the option to assign, transfer and deliver to the Commissioner the original credit instrument and the mortgage securing it, provided that the mortgage is not in default at the expiration of 20 years from the date of final endorsement of the credit instrument. In processing a mortgagee's claim for insurance benefits under this section, the Commissioner may direct the mortgagee to assign, transfer and deliver the original credit instrument, and the mortgage securing it, directly to the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). Upon such assignment, transfer and delivery either to the Commissioner or to GNMA, as directed, the mortgage insurance contract shall terminate and the mortgagee shall be entitled to receive insurance benefits in accordance with § 221.780.

[49 FR 12698, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 57 FR 58351, Dec. 9, 1992]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBrazil soybean yield covariance modelA model based on multiple regression was developed to estimate soybean yields for the seven soybean-growing states of Brazil. The meteorological data of these seven states were pooled and the years 1975 to 1980 were used to model since there was no technological trend in the yields during these years. Predictor variables were derived from monthly total precipitation and monthly average temperature.Document ID19840013854Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCallis, S. L.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Columbia, MO, United States)*Sakamoto, C.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Columbia, MO, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 16, 1984Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberE84-10104JSC-18907NAS 1.26:173373YM-N4-04455NASA-CR-173373Accession Number84N21922Funding Number(s)PROJECT: PROJ. AGRISTARSDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013854.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of Eugene W. Ouderkirk, Respondent, v Board of Appeals of the Town of Bethlehem, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment qf the Supreme Ceurt at Special Term entered November 10, 1976 in Albany County, which granted petitioner’s application in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of respondent board of appeals denying petitioner’s application for a special exception under the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Bethlehem. This article 78 proceeding was commenced to review repondent’s denial of petitioner’s application for a special exception to convert his two-family residence to a three-family residence. The property was located in a Residence (A) area where single family dwellings and two-family dwellings are permitted as of right. Upon the issuance of a special exception by the board of appeals the ordinance also permits apartment buildings of not more than four families provided the exterior conforms to the neighboring buildings. Special Term annulled respondent’s denial and directed issuance of the special permit. This appeal ensued. Respondent, in denying the special exception, concluded it would not be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the district and would be detrimental to it and adjoining districts. It further concluded that the public convenience would not be substantially served and that the appropriate use of neighboring property would be substantially and permanently injured. It is significant that the intended use requested by petitioner is one permitted by the ordinance. The inclusion of such use in this ordinance is tantamount to a finding by the town board that it is in harmony with the general zoning plan and would not adversely affect the neighborhood *(Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston,*30 NY2d 238; *Matter of Bellamente v Kern,*46 *668AD2d 808). It is equally significant that petitioner is not seeking a variance but a special permit where his burden of proof is considerably less *(Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston, supra).*The instant record reveals that no changes were to be made to the exterior of the building; that there would be ample parking space and that only two additional people were to be accommodated by the change. While the appeals board has discretion to evaluate each application for a special permit, any denial must find support in the record that the particular use considered fails to meet the legislative criteria established in the zoning ordinance *(Matter of Pleasant Valley Home Constr. v Board of Appeals of Town of Pleasant Valley,*41 NY2d 1028). An examination of the entire record in light of the ordinance in question demonstrates a lack of evidence to support the board’s resolution. Furthermore, the conclusory findings couched in the language of the ordinance do not justify respondent’s determination. Special Term, therefore, properly annulled it and the judgment must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Larkin, JJ., concur.
### §1322. Ownership limitations

#### (a) General

(1) During a period of 3 years beginning on the sale date, no person, directly or indirectly, may acquire or hold securities representing more than 10 percent of the total votes of all outstanding voting securities of the Corporation.

(2) This subsection shall not apply—

(A) to the employee stock ownership plan (or successor plans) of the Corporation,

(B) to the Secretary of Transportation,

(C) to a railroad as described under subsection (b),

(D) to underwriting syndicates holding shares for resale, or

(E) in the case of shares beneficially held for others, to commercial banks, broker-dealers, clearing corporations, or other nominees.

#### (b) Railroads

(1) During a period of 1 year beginning on the sale date, no railroad may purchase or hold, directly or indirectly, more than 10 percent of any class of stock of the Corporation. During such period, no railroad may file an application with the Commission for a merger or consolidation with the Corporation or the acquisition of control of the Corporation under section 11344 1 of title 49.

(2) During a period of 3 years beginning on the sale date, any railroad which purchases or holds any stock of the Corporation shall vote such stock in the same proportion as all other common stock of the Corporation is voted. After the expiration of 1 year after the sale date, the preceding sentence shall not apply to any railroad with respect to which the Commission has approved an application for a merger or consolidation with the Corporation or the acquisition of control of the Corporation under section 11344 1 of title 49.

(3) As used in this subsection, the term "railroad" means a class I railroad as determined by the Commission under the definition in effect on October 21, 1986, and includes any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with any railroad (other than the Corporation or its subsidiaries).

(Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, §4022, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1900.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 11344 of title 49, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), (2), was omitted in the general amendment of subtitle IV of Title 49, Transportation, by Pub. L. 104–88, title I, §102(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 804. Provisions similar to those in section 11344 are contained in sections 11324 and 14303 of Title 49.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission and Transfer of Functions

Interstate Commerce Commission abolished and functions of Commission transferred, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 104–88, to Surface Transportation Board effective Jan. 1, 1996, by section 1302 of Title 49, Transportation, and section 101 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49. References to Interstate Commerce Commission deemed to refer to Surface Transportation Board, a member or employee of the Board, or Secretary of Transportation, as appropriate, see section 205 of Pub. L. 104–88, set out as a note under section 1301 of Title 49.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §1102. Statement of purpose

It is therefore declared to be the purpose of the Congress in this subtitle to provide for—

(1) the removal by a date certain of the Federal Government's obligation to subsidize the freight operations of Conrail;

(2) transfer of Conrail commuter service responsibilities to one or more entities whose principal purpose is the provision of commuter service; and

(3) an orderly return of Conrail freight service to the private sector.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1133, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 644.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle E (§§1131–1169) of title XI of Pub. L. 97–35, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 643, known as the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1101 of this title and Tables.
```

[House Report 110-522]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     110-522

======================================================================

 
   WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(A) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 
  CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON 
                                 RULES

                                _______
                                

   February 6, 2008.--Referred to the House and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 955]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 955, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any resolution reported on the legislative day of Thursday, 
February 7, 2008, relating to a bill to provide economic 
stimulus.

                                  

```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 20372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07764]

[[Page 20372]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8267]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Hall of Ancient Egypt''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Hall of Ancient Egypt,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Houston Museum 
of Natural Science, Houston, Texas, from on or about May 20, 2013, 
until on or about March 31, 2016, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

     Dated: March 20, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-07764 Filed 4-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3180 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3180

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
           qualified attorney fees in computing minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 
           qualified attorney fees in computing minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION ALLOWED IN COMPUTING MINIMUM TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 212 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to expenses for production of income) is amended to read as 
follows:

``SEC. 212. EXPENSES FOR PRODUCTION OF INCOME.

    ``(a) Allowance of Deduction.--In the case of an individual, there 
shall be allowed as a deduction all the ordinary and necessary expenses 
paid or incurred during the taxable year--
            ``(1) for the production or collection of income,
            ``(2) for the management, conservation, or maintenance of 
        property held for the production of income, or
            ``(3) in connection with the determination, collection, or 
        refund of any tax.
    ``(b) Qualified Attorney Fees.--For purposes of this section--
            ``(1) Allowance of deduction.--The ordinary and necessary 
        expenses paid or incurred for the production or collection of 
        income (referred to in subsection (a)(1)) include qualified 
        attorney fees.
            ``(2) Deduction allowed in computing minimum tax.--The 
        deduction under subsection (a) for qualified attorney fees 
        shall be allowed for purposes of the tax imposed by section 55.
            ``(3) Qualified attorney fees.--The term `qualified 
        attorney fees' means attorney fees and court costs paid by, or 
        on behalf of, the taxpayer in connection with any judgment or 
        settlement (whether by suit or agreement and whether as lump 
        sum or periodic payments) resulting from a civil action brought 
        by the taxpayer in a court of law.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1007.35 Loan terms. To be eligible for guarantee under this part, the loan shall: ( a ) Be made for a term not exceeding 30 years;
( b ) Bear interest (exclusive of the guarantee fee under § 1007.55 and service charges, if any) at a rate agreed upon by the borrower and the lender and determined by HUD to be reasonable, but not to exceed the rate generally charged in the area (as determined by HUD) for home mortgage loans not guaranteed or insured by any agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government;
( c ) Involve a principal obligation not exceeding: ( 1 ) 97.75 percent of the appraised value of the property as of the date the loan is accepted for guarantee (or 98.75 percent if the value of the property is $50,000 or less); or
( 2 ) The amount approved by HUD under this section; and
( d ) Involve a payment on account of the property: ( 1 ) In cash or its equivalent; or
( 2 ) Through the value of any improvements, appraised in accordance with generally accepted practices and procedures.
### §2406. Miscellaneous

#### (a) Authority of Secretary

The Secretary may enter into contracts, financial assistance agreements, and such other agreements, and promulgate such regulations, as are necessary to carry out this subchapter.

#### (b) Transfer of projects

Nothing in this subchapter authorizes the transfer of pre-existing facilities or pre-existing components of any water system from Federal to private ownership or from private to Federal ownership.

#### (c) Federal reclamation law

Nothing in this subchapter supersedes or amends any Federal law associated with a project, or portion of a project, constructed under Federal reclamation law.

#### (d) Interagency coordination

The Secretary shall coordinate the Program carried out under this subchapter with existing Federal and State rural water and wastewater programs to facilitate the most efficient and effective solution to meeting the water needs of the non-Federal project sponsors.

#### (e) Multiple Indian tribes

In any case in which a contract is entered into with, or a grant is made, to 1 an organization to perform services benefitting more than 1 Indian tribe under this subchapter, the approval of each such Indian tribe shall be a prerequisite to entering into the contract or making the grant.

#### (f) Ownership of facilities

Title to any facility planned, designed, and recommended for construction under this subchapter shall be held by the non-Federal project entity.

#### (g) Expedited procedures

If the Secretary determines that a community to be served by a proposed rural water supply project has urgent and compelling water needs, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, expedite appraisal investigations and reports conducted under section 2404 of this title and feasibility studies and reports conducted under section 2405 of this title.

#### (h) Effect on State water law

#### (1) In general

Nothing in this subchapter preempts or affects State water law or an interstate compact governing water.

#### (2) Compliance required

The Secretary shall comply with State water laws in carrying out this subchapter.

#### (i) No additional requirements

Nothing in this subchapter requires a feasibility study for, or imposes any other additional requirements with respect to, rural water supply projects or programs that are authorized before December 22, 2006.

(Pub. L. 109–451, title I, §107, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3355.)

1 So in original. The comma probably should follow "to".