alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Castle Inn Restaurant, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Stassa Prevelegianos et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Motion by plaintiffs for a stay, pending appeal, denied. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 10—TAX ON CARRIERS AND EMPLOYEES**
§ 3280.801 Scope. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75756 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) Subpart I of this part and Part II of Article 550 of the National Electrical Code (NFPA No. 70-2005) cover the electrical conductors and equipment installed within or on manufactured homes and the conductors that connect manufactured homes to a supply of electricity.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of this part and Part II of Article 550 of the National Electrical Code (NFPA No. 70-2005), the applicable portions of other Articles of the National Electrical Code must be followed for electrical installations in manufactured homes. The use of arc-fault breakers under Articles 210.12(A) and (B), 440.65, and 550.25(A) and (B) of the National Electrical Code, NFPA No. 70-2005 is not required. However, if arc-fault breakers are provided, such use must be in accordance with the National Electrical Code, NFPA No. 70-2005. Wherever the requirements of this standard differ from the National Electrical Code, these standards apply.
( c ) The provisions of this standard apply to manufactured homes intended for connection to a wiring system nominally rated 120/240 volts, 3-wire AC, with grounded neutral.
( d ) All electrical materials, devices, appliances, fittings and other equipment shall be listed or labeled by a nationally recognized testing agency and shall be connected in an approved manner when in service.
( e ) Aluminum conductors, aluminum alloy conductors, and aluminum core conductors such as copper clad aluminum; are not acceptable for use in branch circuit wiring in manufactured homes.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 58 FR 55019, Oct. 25, 1993; 70 FR 72051, Nov. 30, 2005; 71 FR 19639, Apr. 17, 2006]
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 08-4087

1 n:\cxlit\li2008\090087\00630453.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

DANNY CHOU, State Bar # 180240 

Chief of Complex and Special Litigation 

JAMES M. EMERY, State Bar #153630 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, Seventh Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3800 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3985 

E-Mail: jim.emery@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACY 

PROJECT, a nonprofit organization, 

COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS, a 

nonprofit organization, CALVIN DAVIS, 

on behalf of himself and all other 

individuals similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

MAYOR GAVIN NEWSOM, in his 

official capacity, BOARD OF 

SUPERVISORS OF SAN FRANCISCO 

COUNTY, in its official capacity, and 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO,

 Defendants. 

Case No. 3:08-cv-04087-MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR 

HEARING ON JOINT MOTION FOR 

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 

The parties have filed a Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement. 

This motion is presently set for hearing on June 25, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Defendants have filed a motion 

to shorten time for this hearing. Plaintiffs do not oppose this request. For good cause shown, the 

Case 3:08-cv-04087-MMC Document 91 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER 

CASE NO. 08-4087

2 n:\cxlit\li2008\090087\00630453.doc 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion. The Court will hear the Joint Motion for Preliminary 

Approval of Settlement Agreement on June 4, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________________ ____________________________ 

 HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

 United States District Judge 

May 25, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04087-MMC Document 91 Filed 05/25/10 Page 2 of 2
DSpace Repository

# A chronology of middle Missouri Plains village sites

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# A chronology of middle Missouri Plains village sites

Johnson, CraigAhler, Stanley A.Haas, HerbertBonani, Georges

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.47.1

Date:					2007

### Citation:					

*A chronology of middle Missouri Plains village sites**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.47.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0047.pdf

Size:9.628Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:sca-0047.epub

Size:4.807Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:sca-0047.mobi

Size:5.132Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
§ 201.61 Claims against debtors—principal amount of debt. ( a ) *Liability.* A debtor is liable to the Secretary for the principal amount of the debt, as described in paragraphs (b), (c), or (d) of this section, as appropriate.
( b ) *Property improvement notes.* In the case of an assigned note for a property improvement loan, the principal amount of the debt is the unpaid amount of the loan obligation, as defined in § 201.55(a)(1) of this part, plus amounts described in §§ 201.55(a) (3), (4), (5).
( c ) *Manufactured home notes.* In the case of an assigned note for a manufactured home loan, the principal amount of the debt is the unpaid amount of the loan obligation, as defined in § 201.55(b)(1) of this part, plus amounts described in §§ 201.55(b) (3) through (8).
( d ) *Assigned judgments.* In the case of a judgment obtained by the lender on a property improvement loan or a manufactured home loan and assigned to the Secretary, the principal amount of the debt is the amount of the judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3065 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3065

     To extend the aviation war risk insurance program for 3 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2005

  Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Duncan) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the aviation war risk insurance program for 3 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AIRLINE WAR RISK POLICIES AND TERRORISM 
              COVERAGE.

    (a) Extension of Policies.--Section 44302(f)(1) of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``August 31, 2005, and shall extend 
through December 31, 2005,'' in paragraph (1) and inserting ``August 
31, 2008, and shall extend through December 31, 2008,''.
    (b) Extension of Terrorism Coverage.--Section 44303(b) of title 49, 
United States Code, is amended by striking ``December 31, 2005,'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2008,''.
                                 <all>
```
### §315j. Appropriation of moneys received; application of public-land laws to Indian ceded lands; application for mineral title to lands

When appropriated by Congress, 331/3 per centum of all grazing fees received from each grazing district on Indian lands ceded to the United States for disposition under the public-land laws during any fiscal year shall be paid at the end thereof by the Secretary of the Treasury to the State in which said lands are situated, to be expended as the State legislature may prescribe for the benefit of public schools and public roads of the county or counties in which such grazing lands are situated. And the remaining 662/3 per centum of all grazing fees received from such grazing lands shall be deposited to the credit of the Indians pending final disposition under applicable laws, treaties, or agreements. The applicable public land laws as to said Indian ceded lands within a district created under this subchapter shall continue in operation, except that each and every application for nonmineral title to said lands in a district created under this subchapter shall be allowed only if in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior the land is of the character suited to disposal through the Act under which application is made and such entry and disposal will not affect adversely the best public interest, but no settlement or occupation of such lands shall be permitted until ninety days after allowance of an application.

(June 28, 1934, ch. 865, §11, 48 Stat. 1273; Aug. 6, 1947, ch. 507, §3, 61 Stat. 791.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1947—Act Aug. 6, 1947, provided that 331/3 per centum of grazing fees on certain Indian lands be paid to the States and the remaining 662/3 per centum of such fees be credited to the Indians.
§ 35.630 Conversions and major rehabilitations. The procedures and requirements of this section apply when a nonresidential property constructed before 1978 is to be converted to residential use, or a residential property constructed before 1978 is to undergo rehabilitation that is estimated to cost more than 50 percent of the estimated replacement cost after rehabilitation. ( a ) *Lead-based paint inspection.* Before issuance of a firm FHA commitment, the sponsor shall conduct a lead-based paint inspection in accordance with § 35.1320(a).
( b ) *Abatement.* Prior to occupancy, the sponsor shall conduct abatement of all lead-based paint on the property in accordance with § 35.1325. Whenever practicable, abatement shall be achieved through the methods of paint removal or component replacement. If paint removal or component replacement are not practicable, that is if such methods would damage substrate material considered architecturally significant, permanent encapsulation or enclosure may be used as methods of abatement. Abatement is considered complete when clearance is achieved in accordance with § 35.1340. If encapsulation or enclosure is used, the sponsor shall incorporate ongoing lead-based paint maintenance into regular building operations maintenance activities in accordance with § 35.1355.
( c ) *Historic properties.* Section 35.115(a)(13) applies to this section.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date:  May 9, 2006 | /s/  Erick Mason        |   |
|--------|--------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |               | Erick  Mason            |
|   |               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
^ " V. ^

»

v'*v\ -• «aAO 154^^3)Substitution y

r,>o States District Court

ern District of California

<;>

Katy Sullivan

PlaintifT(s)»

V.

Washington Mutual FA, et al.

Defendant (s),

Motice is hereby given that, subject toapproval bythe court, Katy Sullivan, In Pro Se

(Party (s)NanK)

Katy Sullivan, In Pro Se

(Nameof New Attorney)

place of J. Brian McCauley, Esq.

CONSENT ORDER GRANTING

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

CASE NUMBER; 3:09-cv-02161-EMC

.State Bar No.

substitutes

as counsel ofrecord in

(Name of Attorney (s) Withdrawing Appearance)

Contact information for new counsel is as follows:

Firm Name: . Katy Sullivan

Address:

Telephone: (510) 551-6885

2628 Sutter Street. San Francisco, CA 34115

E-Mail (Optional): katymsullivan@gmail.com

I consent to the above substitution.

Date: 1/21/2015

I consent to being substituted.

Date;

I consent to the above substitution.

Thesubstitution of attorney is hereby approved andso ORDERED.

Date:

Facsimile

(Signatureof Party (s))

(Signature of FormerAtlo

(Signatureof New Attorney)

Judge

[Note: Aseparate consent order ofsubstitutionmustbe filed by eachnewattorney wishing to enter an appearance.]

2/5/15

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen

Case 3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document 140 Filed 02/05/15 Page 1 of 1
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4186 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-631

Certain Liquid Crystal Display 

Devices and Products 

Containing the Same
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4186 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-631

Certain Liquid Crystal Display 

Devices and Products 

Containing the Same
### Capitol Lake, Washington, 2004 data summary

By: Jodi EshlemanPeter RuggieroEtienne KingsleyGuy GelfenbaumDoug George

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds180

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Companion Files:                               - **Companion Files**
  - **Companion Files** 
- Metadata:  **Metadata**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.0



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Joseph L. MancinoJoseph L. Mancino President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Michael P. PuorroMichael P. Puorro Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




Date:  August 14,
2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 77879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28401]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Chapter 1


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Small Entity Compliance Guide

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the 
Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the 
Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 
This Small Entity Compliance Guide has been prepared in accordance with 
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 
of 1996. It consists of a summary of the rule appearing in Federal 
Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2001-27 which amends the FAR. An asterisk 
(*) next to a rule indicates that a regulatory flexibility analysis has 
been prepared. Interested parties may obtain further information 
regarding this rule by referring to FAC 2001-27, which precedes this 
document. These documents are also available via the Internet at http://www.acqnet.gov/far.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurieann Duarte, FAR Secretariat, 
(202) 501-4225. For clarification of content, contact Cecelia Davis at 
(202) 219-0202.

Free Trade Agreements--Australia and Morocco

    This interim rule allows contracting officers to purchase the 
products of Australia and Morocco without application of the Buy 
American Act if the acquisition is subject to the Free Trade 
Agreements. The U.S. Trade Representative negotiated Free Trade 
Agreements with Australia and Morocco, which go into effect January 1, 
2005, according to Public Laws 108-286 and 108-302. These Agreements 
join the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Chile and 
Singapore Free Trade Agreements which are already in the FAR. The 
threshold for applicability of the Australian Free Trade Agreement is 
$58,550 (the same as other Free Trade Agreements to date), but the 
threshold for applicability of the Morocco Free Trade Agreement is 
$175,000. Because of the short statutory time frame, this is an interim 
rule. Also in this rule are changes requested by the U.S. Trade 
Representative, in the list of Least Developed Countries, and changes 
in terminology on how the FAR uses the terms ``designated country'' and 
``Trade Agreements Act.'' Some technical changes are also included.

    Dated: December 22, 2004.
Laura Auletta,
Director, Contract Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 04-28401 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VITECH
AMERICA, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            5,719,478
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    61,407,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4,103,146
<INVENTORY>                                      19,555,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 97,773,002
<PP&E>                                           23,785,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,648,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  157,377,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            87,789,612
<BONDS>                                           2,198,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                         86,808,045
<OTHER-SE>                                     (46,162,857)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    157,377,865
<SALES>                                          57,487,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 57,487,567
<CGS>                                            37,568,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    51,127,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5,992,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,873,806
<INCOME-TAX>                                          9,279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1,864,527
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,864,527
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.11



</TABLE>
#### G. S. Hardy et al., appellants, v. W. S. Jones et al., appellees.

Bill for mandatory injunction. Dismissed for want of equity. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Edgar county; the Hon. Walter Brewer, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 2, 1923.

George W. Bristow, State’s Attorney, and Wilber H. Hickman, for appellants. Stewart W. Kincaid and James K. Lauher, for appellees.

Per Curiam.