alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 570.600 General. ( a ) This subpart K enumerates laws that the Secretary will treat as applicable to grants made under section 106 of the Act, other than grants to states made pursuant to section 106(d) of the Act, for purposes of the Secretary's determinations under section 104(e)(1) of the Act, including statutes expressly made applicable by the Act and certain other statutes and Executive Orders for which the Secretary has enforcement responsibility. This subpart K applies to grants made under the Insular Areas Program in § 570.405 and § 570.440 with the exception of § 570.612. The absence of mention herein of any other statute for which the Secretary does not have direct enforcement responsibility is not intended to be taken as an indication that, in the Secretary's opinion, such statute or Executive Order is not applicable to activities assisted under the Act. For laws that the Secretary will treat as applicable to grants made to states under section 106(d) of the Act for purposes of the determination required to be made by the Secretary pursuant to section 104(e)(2) of the Act, see § 570.487.
( b ) This subpart also sets forth certain additional program requirements which the Secretary has determined to be applicable to grants provided under the Act as a matter of administrative discretion.
( c ) In addition to grants made pursuant to section 106(b) and 106(d)(2)(B) of the Act (subparts D and F, respectively), the requirements of this subpart K are applicable to grants made pursuant to sections 107 and 119 of the Act (subparts E and G, respectively), and to loans guaranteed pursuant to subpart M.
[53 FR 34456, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 11477, Mar. 20, 1996; 72 FR 12536, Mar. 15, 2007]
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case Nos. C08-05481 1 US_ACTIVE-103476368.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO STRIKE 

Scott D. Baker (SBN 84923) 

Email: sbaker@reedsmith.com 

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) 

Email: jbovich@reedsmith.com 

Jonah D. Mitchell (SBN 203511) 

Email: jmitchell@reedsmith.com 

James A. Daire (SBN 239637) 

Email: jdaire@reedsmith.com 

REED SMITH LLP

101 Second Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3659 

Telephone: +1 415 543 8700 

Facsimile: +1 415 391 8269 

Attorneys for 

Sybase, Inc. and Informatica Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

DATA RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY LLC, a 

Delaware Corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SYBASE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a Delaware 

Corporation, 

 Defendants. 

SYBASE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and 

INFORMATICA CORPORATION, a Delaware 

Corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

DATA RETRIEVAL TECHNOLOGY LLC, a 

Delaware Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: C08-05481 VRW 

(Related Case No.: C09-1909 VRW) 

(Related Case No.: C 09-05360 VRW) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME 

AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON 

MOTION TO STRIKE 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

Case 3:09-cv-01909-JCS Document 78 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case Nos. C08-05481 - 1 - US_ACTIVE-103476368.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO STRIKE 

Having considered the papers submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court 

hereby enters the following Order Changing Time and sets the following briefing schedule in 

connection with DRT’s Motion to Strike: 

(1) Sybase, Inc. and Informatica Corporation will have until noon on April 6, 2010 to file 

their opposition papers in connection with DRT’s Motion to Strike; 

(2) DRT will have no reply brief in support of its Motion to Strike; and 

(3) DRT’s Motion to Strike will be heard on April 8, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., concurrently with 

the other matters on calendar in this dispute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED. 

DATED: _________________, 2010. 

By 

Hon. Vaughn R. Walker 

United States District Chief Judge 

April 6 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cv-01909-JCS Document 78 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2
### §3583. Application to access data assets for developing evidence

(a) Standard Application Process.—The Director shall establish a process through which agencies, the Congressional Budget Office, State, local, and Tribal governments, researchers, and other individuals, as appropriate, may apply to access the data assets accessed or acquired under this subchapter by a statistical agency or unit for purposes of developing evidence. The process shall include the following:

(1) Sufficient detail to ensure that each statistical agency or unit establishes an identical process.

(2) A common application form.

(3) Criteria for statistical agencies and units to determine whether to grant an applicant access to a data asset.

(4) Timeframes for prompt determinations by each statistical agency or unit.

(5) An appeals process for adverse decisions and noncompliance with the process established under this subsection.

(6) Standards for transparency, including requirements to make the following information publicly available:

(A) Each application received.

(B) The status of each application.

(C) The determination made for each application.

(D) Any other information, as appropriate, to ensure full transparency of the process established under this subsection.

(b) Consultation.—In establishing the process required under subsection (a), the Director shall consult with stakeholders, including the public, agencies, State and local governments, and representatives of non-governmental researchers.

(c) Implementation.—The head of each statistical agency or unit shall implement the process established under subsection (a).

(Added Pub. L. 115–435, title III, §303(a), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5555.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Jan. 14, 2019, see section 403 of Pub. L. 115–435, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 306 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §781. Repealed. June 29, 1936, ch. 867, title III, §303, 49 Stat. 2033

Section, R.S. §4744; acts July 25, 1882, ch. 349, §2, 22 Stat. 175; July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §2, 46 Stat. 1016, related to investigation of frauds in connection with bounty-land claims.
### §2804. National spatial data infrastructure

#### (a) In general

The National Spatial Data Infrastructure shall ensure that geospatial data from multiple sources (including the covered agencies, State, local, and tribal governments, the private sector, and institutions of higher education) is available and easily integrated to enhance the understanding of the physical and cultural world.

#### (b) Goals

The goals of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure are to—

(1) ensure—

(A) that geospatial data are reviewed prior to disclosure to ensure—

(i) compliance with section 552a of title 5 (commonly known as the "Privacy Act of 1974"); and

(ii) that personally identifiable information is not disclosed, which shall include an assessment of re-identification risk when determining what data constitute personally identifiable information;

(B) that geospatial data are designed to enhance the accuracy of statistical information, both in raw form and in derived information products;

(C) free and open access for the public to geospatial data, information, and interpretive products, in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A–130, or any successor thereto;

(D) the protection of proprietary interests related to licensed information and data; and

(E) the interoperability and sharing capabilities of Federal information systems and data to enable the drawing of resources from covered agencies and partners of covered agencies; and

(2) support and advance the establishment of a Global Spatial Data Infrastructure, consistent with national security, national defense, national intelligence, and international trade requirements, including ensuring that covered agencies develop international geospatial data in accordance with international voluntary consensus standards, as defined in Office of Management and Budget Circular A–119, or any successor thereto.

#### (c) Strategic plan

The Committee shall prepare and maintain a strategic plan for the development and implementation of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure in a manner consistent with national security, national defense, and emergency preparedness program policies regarding data accessibility.

#### (d) Advisory role

The Committee shall advise Federal and non-Federal users of geospatial data on their responsibilities relating to implementation of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title VII, §755, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3420.)
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 List of Subsidiaries Great Wolf Resorts, Inc.
GWR Operating Partnership, LLLP
GWR OP General Partner, LLC
Great Bear Lodge of Sandusky, LLC
Great Bear Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, LLC
Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC
Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC
Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas, LLC
Great Wolf Kansas SPE, LLC
GWL KC Beverage, Inc.
Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, LLC
Williamsburg Meadows, LLC
Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC
Great Wolf Traverse SPE, LLC
GLGB Manager III, LLC
GWR Michigan, LLC
Great Lakes Services, LLC
Niagara Glenview Tent & Trailer Park Company
Great Wolf Capital Trust I
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRAE D.D. COLE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 143 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 35.820 Interim controls. HUD shall conduct interim controls in accordance with § 35.1330 to treat the lead-based paint hazards identified in the evaluation conducted in accordance with § 35.815. Interim controls are considered completed when clearance is achieved in accordance with § 35.1340. Interim controls of all lead-based paint hazards shall be completed no later than the following schedule: ( a ) In units occupied by families with children of less than 6 years of age and in common areas servicing those units, interim controls shall be completed no later than 90 days after the completion of the risk assessment. In units in which a child of less than 6 years of age moves in after the completion of the risk assessment, interim controls shall be completed no later than 90 days after the move-in.
( b ) In all other dwelling units, common areas, and the remaining portions of the residential property, interim controls shall be completed no later than 12 months after completion of the risk assessment for those units.
( c ) If conveyance of the title by HUD at a sale of a HUD-owned property or a foreclosure sale caused by HUD when HUD is mortgagee-in-possession occurs before the schedule in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, HUD shall complete interim controls before conveyance or foreclosure, or HUD shall be responsible for assuring that interim controls are carried out by the purchaser. If interim controls are made a condition of sale, such controls shall be completed according to the following schedule: ( 1 ) In units occupied by families with children of less than 6 years of age and in common areas servicing those units, interim controls shall be completed no later than 90 days after the date of the closing of the sale. In units in which a child of less than 6 years of age moves in after the closing of the sale, interim controls shall be completed no later than 90 days after the move-in.
( 2 ) In all other dwelling units, in common areas servicing those units, and in the remaining portions of the residential property, interim controls shall be completed no later than 180 days after the closing of the sale.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00320

- CR

Willie David FLOYD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

Fr om the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR10665

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record has been filed in this appeal. The reporter’s record w as due July 18,

2016 . On July 27, 2016 , the court reporter filed a notification of late record stating the reporter ’ s

record was not filed because appellant ha s not requested a reporter ’ s record, appellant ha s failed

to pay or make arrangements to pay the reporter ’ s fee for preparing the record

, and appellant is

not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. If appellant desire s a reporter ’ s record to be filed in

this appeal, he must request that a reporter ’ s record be prepared. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(b)(1).

Appellant is represented on appeal by retained counsel Mr. William L. Baskette.

Accordingly, if appellant desire s a rep orter ’ s record, Mr. Baskette is hereby ORDERED

to (1) request in writing, no later than August 8, 2016 , that a reporter ’ s record be prepared and

(2) designate in writing, no later than August 8, 2016 , the exhibits and those portions of the

record to be inc luded in the reporter ’ s record. Id. Mr. Baskette is hereby ORDERED to file a

copy of the request with both the trial court clerk, id. at 34.6(b)(2), and this court no later than

August 8, 2016

.

It is further ORDERED that Mr. Baskette provide written proof to this court no later than

August 8, 2016 that either (1) the reporter ’ s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made

to pay the reporter ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter ’ s fee.

If Mr. B askette fail s to provide such written proof within the time provided, appellant ’ s brief will

be due August 29, 2016 , and th is court will only consider those issues or points raised in

appellant ’ s brief that do not require a reporter ’ s record for a decision

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 37.3(c).It is so ORDERED on July 29, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3112 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3112

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain decorative plates, 
     decorative sculptures, decorative plaques, and architectural 
                              miniatures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2005

   Mr. Kirk introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain decorative plates, 
     decorative sculptures, decorative plaques, and architectural 
                              miniatures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN DECORATIVE PLATES, DECORATIVE SCULPTURES, DECORATIVE 
              PLAQUES, AND ARCHITECTURAL MINIATURES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.51      Decorative plates,  Free         No change        No change        12/31/2008        ''.
                         whether or not
                         with decorative
                         rim or attached
                         sculpture;
                         decorative
                         sculptures, each
                         with plate or
                         plaque attached,
                         and decorative
                         plaques each not
                         over 7.65 cm in
                         thickness;
                         architectural
                         miniatures,
                         whether or not
                         put up in sets;
                         all the foregoing
                         of resin
                         materials and
                         containing
                         agglomerated
                         stone, put up for
                         mail order retail
                         sale, whether for
                         wall or tabletop
                         display and each
                         weighing not over
                         1.36 kg together
                         with their retail
                         packaging
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3926.40.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Pierce Yacht Basin Inc., Petitioner v Peter A. A. Berle, as Commissioner of Environmental Conservation, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated July 13, 1976 and made after a hearing, which denied petitioner’s *824application for a moratorium permit. By order dated January 24, 1977 this court directed the respondent, within 180 days thereof, to set a date certain for the termination of the moratorium on alteration of tidal wetlands pursuant to ECL 25-0202 and the proceeding has been held in abeyance in the interim *(Matter of Pierce Yacht Basin v Berle,*55 AD2d 935). Appropriate regulations have been filed. Proceeding dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements (cf. *Matter of Russo v New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation,*61 AD2d 824). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Damiani and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Shengtai Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Yiru Shi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. That the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
September 28, 2009





SHENGTAI
      PHARMACEUTICAL, INC./s/
      Yiru ShiYiru
      ShiChief
      Financial Officer
|                                                                                   |         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------
|Wachovia Corporation
						301 South College Street
						Charlotte, NC 28288-0800 | WACHOVIA

Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, Wachovia Bank, National Association (the Bank) has complied
in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, relating to its servicing of asset securitizations, pursuant to the respective Servicing
Agreements for the Wachovia Asset Securitization Issuance, LLC (WASI) Trust 2003 HE-3 and 2004 HE-1 (collectively the Trusts), except for minimum
servicing standards I.2, I.4, III.3, III.4, III.6, V.3, and V.4, which are inapplicable to the servicing of the WASI Trusts.  As of and for
this same period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $25 million,
respectively.

/s/John Gordon
						Asset Backed Services
						John Gordon
  March 15,2005/s/Kirk Bare
						Retail Credit Products and Businesses
						Kirk Bare
  3/22/05
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHEP USA, a New York General

Partnership,

Plaintiff,

v

ROSALINDA VASQUEZ, et al,

Defendants. /

No C 09-2608 VRW

ORDER

On June 11, 2009, plaintiff filed a complaint in this

action for recovery of personal property, conversion and unlawful

business practices. Doc #1. The parties now request that the

court enter stipulated judgment against defendants. Doc #29. 

Having considered the matter, the court HEREBY GRANTS the parties’

motion. Doc #29.

The clerk is DIRECTED to enter the attached form of

judgment and close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02608-VRW Document 32 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 1
OG/03/2010 1G:4T FAX 2024935142 FAA •* DMS @]001/003 

;-':;T r-.-

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

American Eagle Airlines, Inc. 

FAA Case No. 2008SW210288 

FAA Docket No. CP09SW0006 

Hon. Richard C. Goodwin 

BRIEFING ORDER 

The parties ih the above numbered and. entitled matter have mutually 

agreed to submit post-hearing briefs as follows: 

Complainant's Brief June 4, 2010 

Respondent's Brief July 2,2010 

Complainant's Reply Brief July 16, 2010 v 

Respectfully submitted, 

LYNETTEWORD 

Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

Rena M, Price 

Senior Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

By: 

i-ii' vj" 7.:} 

•'I I ' - •'• < - I ;;,f- . 

•, ' ,•••. ' u ; ; ~\::i . •-. •.:>. •-.y , \ 

}RWio:] 
OG/03/2010 1G:47 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS @1002/003 

Francis C. Hell, Senior Attorney 

Legal Department 

American Airiines, Inc. 

PC-Box619616 MD5675 

DFW Airport, TX 75261-9616 

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of. , 2010. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U. S. Administrative Law Judge 
06/03/2010 16:47 FAX 2024935142 FAA . nuo 

'^'^'^ ^ DMS E1003/003 

SERVICE LIS! 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Alt: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Bulldinn - Room 2014 

ONE COPY 

Rena M. Price 

Senior Attorney. Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Adniinlsfration 

2601 Meacham Blvd. Rm 663 

Fort Worth. TX 76137 

Francis C. Heil, Esq. 

Legal Department 

American Airlines. Inc. 

4333 Amon Carter Blvd., MO 5675 

Fort Worth. TX 76155 

The Honorable Richard Hon. Richard C. Goodwin 

DOT Office of Hearings, M-20 

East Building Ground Floor. Rm. El2-320 

1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E. 

Washington. DC 20690 

TEL: 202^366-2139 - Atty Advisor 

202/366-5121 - Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202/366-7536
### Trace-Element Concentrations in Tissues of Aquatic Organisms from Rivers and Streams of the United States, 1992-1999

By: Lawrence R. DeWeeseVerlin C. StephensTerry M. Short**Neil M. Dubrovsky**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds309

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract