### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 3 0 1 1 2 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

L E E D E L L N A T I O N
, J R

. , a l s o k n o w n a s P o p , a l s o k n o w n a s D o o m ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o

. 3 : 0 2

- C R

- 3 0 0 4 3

- 1

B e f o r e D A V I S
, S M I T H
, a n d W I E N E R
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

L e e D e l l N a t i o n , J r

. , f e d e r a l p r i s o n e r # 1 1 5 7 8

- 0 3 5 , a p p e a l s t h e d i s t r i c t

c o u r t ’ s i m p o s i t i o n o f a r e d u c e d s e n t e n c e p u r s u a n t t o 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 )
, b a s e d o n t h e a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e G u i d e l i n e g o v e r n i n g c o c a i n e b a s e

. A l t h o u g h

t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t r e d u c e d N a t i o n ’ s s e n t e n c e f r o m 2 3 5 m o n t h s t o 1 8 8 m o n t h s , a t

t h e b o t t o m o f t h e n e w l y a p p l i c a b l e g u i d e l i n e s r a n g e , N a t i o n a r g u e s t h a t ,
p u r s u a n t t o U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. B o o k e r , 5 4 3 U

. S

. 2 2 0 ( 2 0 0 5 )
, t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t h a d

t h e d i s c r e t i o n t o d e p a r t f r o m t h e a m e n d e d g u i d e l i n e s r a n g e

. H e f u r t h e r a r g u e s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 17, 20 10
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30112 Document: 00511205745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010N o

. 1 0

- 3 0 1 1 2

t h a t 2 8 U

. S

. C

. § 9 9 4 ( u ) d o e s n o t g r a n t t h e S e n t e n c i n g C o m m i s s i o n a u t h o r i t y t o
b i n d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d i s c r e t i o n i n § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) c a s e s

. W e r e v i e w a d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d e c i s i o n w h e t h e r t o r e d u c e a s e n t e n c e u n d e r § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) f

o r a n a b u s e o f d i s c r e t i o n , a n d i t s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e S e n t e n c i n g
G u i d e l i n e s i s r e v i e w e d d e n o v o

. U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. D o u b l i n , 5 7 2 F

. 3 d 2 3 5 , 2 3 7 ( 5 t h
C i r

. )
, c e r t

. d e n i e d
, 1 3 0 S

. C t

. 5 1 7 ( 2 0 0 9 )

. B o o k e r i s i n a p p l i c a b l e t o s e n t e n c e

r e d u c t i o n s u n d e r § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 )
, a n d a d i s t r i c t c o u r t m a y n o t r e d u c e a s e n t e n c e
b e l o w t h e m i n i m u m p r o v i d e d i n t h e a m e n d e d g u i d e l i n e s r a n g e

. I d

. a t 2 3 8

. C o n s e q u e n t l y , t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s A F F I R M E D

.

2 Case: 10-30112 Document: 00511205745 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2010