alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued August 15, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 00800
- CV

——————————— CITY OF HOUSTON AND THE POLICE OFFIC ERS ’ AND FIREFIGHTERS ’ CIVIL SERVICE COMMIS SION , Appellant s V. LISA SIMMONS ET AL. , Appellee s
On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 20 04
- 44542

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 29, 2012

. On July 24, 2013 , the parties filed a joint motion requesting that we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment in favor of appellants, City of Houston and the Police Officers’ and Firefighters’ Civil Service Commission, that appellees, Lisa2

Simmons et al., take nothing on their overtime claims

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1 (a)(2)(A)

. No opinion has issued. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, reverse the judgment of the trial court, and render judgment that Lisa Simmons et al. take nothing on their overtime claims. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2) (A), 43.2(c). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this opinion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 18.1. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.
Jump to main content.

Wastes - Educational Materials

Recent Additions | Contact Us**Search:**All EPAThis Area- You are here:  EPA Home
- Wastes
- Educational Materials
-  Teachers: Curriculum and Activities
-  Quest for Less
-  Download the Complete Document
- Quest for Less
- At the Source
- Waste Management
- Putting It All Together
- Glossary
The Quest for         Less: Activities and Resources for Teaching K-8         Download the Complete Document 
The           Quest for Less (PDF)(238 pp, 19MB) — Be patient. This           will take a while because the file is very large. Or you can order the *Collection of Solid Waste Resources on CD-ROM* to obtain a copy           of this resource in Adobe PDF format.
Download the Document in Sections
Cover (PDF) (1pg, 933K)

You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more.

Contents (PDF)(2 pp, 296K)

Acknowledgements (PDF)(5 pp, 134K)

Welcome (PDF)(4 pp, 1MB)

**Unit 1: At the Source**
- Complete        Unit 1 (PDF)  (65 pp, 2.5MB)    - Introduction (PDF)  (1 pg, 55K) 
  - Natural                    Resources (PDF)  (18 pp, 659K)
  - Products (PDF)  (19 pp, 977K)
  - Waste (PDF)  (27 pp, 943K) 

**Unit 2: Waste Management**
- Complete     Unit 2 (PDF)  (110 pp, 3.6MB)    - Introduction (PDF)  (1 pg, 56K) 
  - Source                    Reduction (PDF)  (19 pp, 709K)
  - Recycling (PDF)  (36 pp, 1.5MB)
  - Composting (PDF)  (21 pp, 675K)
  - Landfills                    and Combustion (PDF)  (31 pp, 1MB) 

**Unit 3: Putting It All Together**
- Waste         in Review (PDF)  (19 pp, 978K)

**Glossary (PDF)**(10 pp, 164K)

Top of page
Local Navigation- Wastes Home
- Educational Materials Home
- Kids (K-5)
- Students (6-8)
- Students (9-12)
- Teachers
- Training
- Information Resources
- Laws & Regulations
- 
- EPA Home
- Accessibility
- Privacy and Security Notice
- Contact Us

Jump to main content.
#### § 3280.1001 Scope.

This subpart covers the requirements for attached manufactured homes and other related construction associated with manufactured homes not addressed elsewhere within this part.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

BARBARA BRENNAN SILANO (MASSBAR 055540)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7223

Facsimile: (415) 436- 7234

E-mail: barbara.silano@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONOVAN HENRY,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-01142 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] BOND

MODIFICATION ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and the parties having so stipulated, the Court hereby

ORDERS that the terms of the bond in the above captioned matter be modified as follows:

1. The conditions of release and appearance are modified to reflect that the defendant shall

participate in drug counseling and submit to drug testing , as directed by Pretrial Services.

2. The defendant shall have no contact with any other co-defendant outside the presence of

counsel except that the defendant may have contact with his father, but is instructed not to

talk about the case. 

DATED:

_______________________________

HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

February 5, 2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTH

ALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:09-cr-01142-CRB Document 18 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 1
### SUBCHAPTER II—DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLANNING
#### § 3285.101 Fire separation.

Fire separation distances must be in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 6 of NFPA 501A, 2003 edition (incorporated by reference, see § 3285.4) or the requirements of the LAHJ. The installation instructions must clearly indicate this requirement in a separate section and must caution installers to take into account any local requirements on fire separation.
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page1 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page2 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 3 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page3 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 4 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page4 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 5 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page5 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 6 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page6 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 7 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page7 of 9
Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 8 of 9 Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page8 of 9
Case3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document14 Filed01/22/10 Page9 of 9

January 26, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:09-cv-01273-JCS Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 9 of 9
```

[House Report 105-3]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                      105-3
_______________________________________________________________________

 
   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 581, THE FAMILY PLANNING 
       FACILITATION AND ABORTION FUNDING RESTRICTION ACT OF 1997

                                _______
                                

 February 11, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 46]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 46, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 581, 
the ``Family Planning Facilitation and Abortion Funding 
Restriction Act of 1997'' under a closed rule. The rule 
provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
Representative Smith of New Jersey or his designee and a Member 
opposed to the bill. The rule provides one motion to recommit.

                                

```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3071 

To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, Deputy 

Executive Directors, and General Counsel of the Office of Compliance 

to serve one additional term. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2005 

Mr. NEY (for himself and Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, Deputy Executive Directors, and General Counsel 

of the Office of Compliance to serve one additional term. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING CURRENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, 

4 DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, AND GEN5 ERAL COUNSEL OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE 

6 TO SERVE ONE ADDITIONAL TERM. 

7 (a) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—Notwithstanding sec8 tion 302(a)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 

9 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)), the individual serving as Ex-
2 

•HR 3071 IH 

1 ecutive Director of the Office of Compliance as of the date 

2 of the enactment of this Act may serve one additional 

3 term. 

4 (b) DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.—Notwith5 standing section 302(b)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

6 1382(b)(2)), any individual serving as a Deputy Executive 

7 Director of the Office of Compliance as of the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act may serve one additional term. 

9 (c) GENERAL COUNSEL.—Notwithstanding section 

10 302(c)(5) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(c)(5)), the indi11 vidual serving as General Counsel of the Office of Compli12 ance as of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve 

13 one additional term. 

Æ
### **CHAPTER 50—WESTERN WATER INFRASTRUCTURE**

Sec.
3201.
Authorizations of appropriations.
3202.
Water storage, groundwater storage, and conveyance projects.
3203.
Small water storage and groundwater storage projects.
3204.
Critical maintenance and repair.
3205.
Competitive grant program for large-scale water recycling and reuse program.
3206.
Drought contingency plan funding requirements.
3207.
Multi-benefit projects to improve watershed health.
3208.
Federal assistance for groundwater recharge, aquifer storage, and water source substitution projects.
Order filed, August 14, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00559-CV

____________

SPRING BRANCH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CITY OF 

HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

SOUTHWEST PRECISION PRINTERS, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-41614

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 13, 2018. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Darlene Stein, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

HONG YING YE

Plaintiff(s),

v.

ERICK HOLDER

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-02073 MEJ

JUDGMENT

On July 12, 2010, the Court granted Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS judgment in favor of

Defendant and against Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 12, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-02073-MEJ Document 26 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 94.7 Procedures for children abducted from the United States. Upon receipt of an application requesting access to a child or return of a child abducted from the United States and taken to another country party to the Convention, the U.S. Central Authority shall— ( a ) Review and forward the application to the Central Authority of the country where the child is believed located or provide the applicant with the necessary form, instructions, and the name and address of the appropriate Central Authority for transmittal of the application directly by the applicant;
( b ) Upon request, transmit to the foreign Central Authority requests for a report on the status of any court action when no decision has been reached by the end of six weeks;
( c ) Upon request, facilitate efforts to obtain from appropriate U.S. state authorities and transmit to the foreign Central Authority information regarding the laws of the child's state of habitual residence;
( d ) Upon request, facilitate efforts to obtain from appropriate U.S. state authorities and transmit to the foreign Central Authority a statement as to the wrongfulness of the taking of the child under the laws of the child's state of habitual residence;
( e ) Upon request, facilitate efforts to obtain from appropriate U.S. state authorities and transmit to the foreign Central Authority information relating to the social background of the child;
( f ) Upon request, be available to facilitate possible arrangements for temporary foster care and/or travel for the child from the foreign country to the United States;
( g ) Monitor all cases in which assistance has been sought; and
( h ) Perform such additional functions as the Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs may from time to time direct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          61,038
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     58,047
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,894
<PP&E>                                          16,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,902
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           183
<OTHER-SE>                                       (342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,480
<SALES>                                         59,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,809
<CGS>                                           43,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,009
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Clara Ginter, as Administratrix of the Estate of Francis W. Ginter, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of Buffalo et al., Respondents. Viola G. Wesolowski, as Administratrix of the Estate of Michael A. Wesolowski, Deceased, Appellant, v. City of Buffalo et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and a new trial granted, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: A prima facie case was made out in favor of plaintiffs and dismissal of the complaint was improper. Upon the retrial of this action, the Trial Judge should be very careful to instruct the jury that the court was not responsible for the inordinate delay but that the delay should not in any way impair the rights of any party to the action. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term dismissing the complaints at the close of

*866plaintiffs’ ease.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McCIusky and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Joseph
Restivo, Chief Financial Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(i)  The
Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)  The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Joseph
      RestivoJoseph
      RestivoChief
      Financial OfficerDated:  May
      14, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, CSBN 189450

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8938

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-Mail: Theophous.Reagans@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGINA GUITIERREZ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of )

Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. CV 09-2323-WHA

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION

The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that defendant's time to respond to

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be extended from January 16, 2010 to March 1, 2010.

Counsel for defendant will be out of the office on extended medical leave.

Respectfully submitted this 7th day of January 2010.

DATED: January 7, 2010 By: /s/Bess M. Brewer 

(As agreed via email)

BESS M. BREWER

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

Case3:09-cv-02323-WHA Document18 Filed01/07/10 Page1 of 2

ORDER APPROVING 

STIPULATED EXTENSION 

OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

DUE TO MEDICAL LEAVE

Case 3:09-cv-02323-WHA Document 19 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page -2-

DATED: January 7, 2010 /s/ Theophous H. Reagans

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case3:09-cv-02323-WHA Document18 Filed01/07/10 Page2 of 2

Dated: January 8, 2010. The parties, however, are advised that further extensions to the briefing schedule will not be granted. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02323-WHA Document 19 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 291.405 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart E: *Applicant* means a State, metropolitan city, urban county, governmental entity, tribe, or private nonprofit organization that submits a written expression of interest in eligible properties under this subpart E. Governmental entities include those that have general governmental powers (e.g., a city or county), as well as those with limited or special powers (e.g., public housing agencies or State housing finance agencies). In the case of applicants leasing properties while their applications for Supportive Housing assistance are pending, “applicant” is defined in 24 CFR part 583.
*Homeless* means: ( 1 ) Individuals or families who lack the resources to obtain housing, whose annual income is not in excess of 50 percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD, and who: ( i ) Have a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings;
( ii ) Have a primary nighttime residence that is a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designed to provide temporary living accommodations (including welfare hotels, congregate shelters, and transitional housing, but excluding prisons or other detention facilities); or
( iii ) Are at imminent risk of homelessness because they face immediate eviction and have been unable to identify a subsequent residence, which would result in emergency shelter placement (except that persons facing eviction on the basis of criminal conduct such as drug trafficking and violations of handgun prohibitions shall not be considered homeless for purposes of this definition); or
( 2 ) Persons with disabilities who are about to be released from an institution and are at risk of imminent homelessness because no subsequent residences have been identified and because they lack the resources and support networks necessary to obtain access to housing.
*Lessee* means the applicant, approved by HUD as financially responsible, that executes a lease agreement with HUD for an eligible property.
[64 FR 6482, Feb. 9, 1999]
§ 203.436 Claim procedure—graduated payment mortgages. All of the provisions of this subpart are applicable to mortgages insured under the provisions of § 203.45 except as provided in this section. ( a ) *Beginning of Amortization* means the date one month prior to the date of the first monthly payment to principal or interest.
( b ) The phrases *unpaid principal balance of the loan* or *principal of the mortgage which was unpaid* as used in this subpart, shall be construed to refer to the outstanding mortgage amount as increased by any accrued mortgage interest which was unpaid pursuant to a financing plan approved by the Secretary.
[41 FR 42949, Sept. 29, 1976]
§ 180.600 Date and place of hearing. ( a ) *For Fair Housing Act Cases* — ( 1 ) *Time.* The hearing shall commence not later than 120 days after the issuance of the charge, unless it is impracticable to do so. If the hearing cannot be commenced within this time period, the ALJ shall notify in writing all parties, aggrieved persons, amici, and the Assistant Secretary of the reasons for the delay.
( 2 ) *Place.* The hearing will be conducted at a place in the vicinity in which the discriminatory housing practice is alleged to have occurred or to be about to occur.
( b ) *For Non-Fair Housing Matters.* Hearings shall be held in Washington, DC, unless the ALJ determines that the convenience of the respondent or HUD requires that another place be selected.
( c ) The ALJ may change the time, date or place of the hearing, or may temporarily adjourn or continue a hearing for good cause shown.
Case 3:08-cv-05789-MMC Document 38 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-05789-MMC Document 38 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-05789-MMC Document 38 Filed 03/03/10 Page 3 of 4
March 3, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-05789-MMC Document 38 Filed 03/03/10 Page 4 of 4