alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1907. Libraries of executive departments, service academies, and independent agencies constituted depositories; certifications of need; disposal of unwanted publications

The libraries of the executive departments, of the United States Military Academy, of the United States Naval Academy, of the United States Air Force Academy, of the United States Coast Guard Academy, and of the United States Merchant Marine Academy are designated depositories of Government publications. A depository library within each independent agency may be designated upon certification of need by the head of the independent agency to the Superintendent of Documents. Additional depository libraries within executive departments and independent agencies may be designated to receive Government publications to the extent that the number so designated does not exceed the number of major bureaus or divisions of the departments and independent agencies. These designations may be made only after certification by the head of each executive department or independent agency to the Superintendent of Documents as to the justifiable need for additional depository libraries. Depository libraries within executive departments and independent agencies may dispose of unwanted Government publications after first offering them to the Library of Congress and the Archivist of the United States.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1285.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §87 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §98, 28 Stat. 624; Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–579, §7, 76 Stat. 355).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### Archivist of the United States

References to Archivist of the United States deemed to refer to Archivist appointed under section 2103 of this title with respect to functions transferred by Pub. L. 98–497 or an amendment made by Pub. L. 98–497 and exercised after Apr. 1, 1985, see sections 106 and 108 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as notes under section 2102 of this title.
§ 3285.803 Interior close-up. ( a ) All shipping blocking, strapping, or bracing must be removed from appliances, windows, and doors.
( b ) Interior close up items necessary to join all sections of the home or items subject to transportation damage may be packaged or shipped with the home for site installation.
( c ) Shipped-loose wall paneling necessary for the joining of all sections of the home must be installed by using polyvinyl acetate (PVA) adhesive on all framing members and fastened with minimum 11 ⁄ 2 inch long staples or nails at 6 inches on center panel edges and 12 inches on center in the field, unless alternative fastening methods are permitted in the installation instructions (see Figure A to § 3285.803).
Note:
Specific designs must be approved by a DAPIA and included in the home manufacturer installation instructions.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, William M. McKay,
      Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.




Date:August
                13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ William
              M. McKayWilliam
                M. McKayChief
                Financial Officer
### §315m–3. Availability of contributions received

Contributions received by the Secretary of the Interior under section 315h of this title, toward the administration, protection, and improvement of any district shall be additionally available for the leasing of lands under sections 315m–1 to 315m–4 of this title.

(June 23, 1938, ch. 603, §3, 52 Stat. 1033.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of act June 28, 1934, known as the Taylor Grazing Act, which comprises this subchapter.
```

[House Report 105-73]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-73
_______________________________________________________________________

 
   PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1275, THE CIVILIAN SPACE 
             AUTHORIZATION ACT, FISCAL YEARS 1998 AND 1999
                                _______
                                

   April 23, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

   Mr. McInnis, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 128]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 128, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1275, 
the ``Civilian Space Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1998 and 
1999'' under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of 
general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science.
    The rule waives clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI (three-day 
availability for committee reports) against consideration of 
the bill.
    The rule also makes in order the Committee on Science 
amendment in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment. It further provides that the 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute be considered 
by title, with each title being considered as read.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record 
prior to their consideration will be given priority in 
recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent 
with House rules. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.
```
#### § 705.101 Cross-reference to employee ethical conduct standards and financial disclosure regulations.

Employees of the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) should refer to the executive branch-wide Standards of Ethical Conduct at 5 CFR part 2635, the DFC regulation at 5 CFR 4301.101 which supplements the executive branch-wide standards, and the executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulation at 5 CFR part 2634.

[58 FR 33320, June 17, 1993, as amended at 84 FR 37751, Aug. 2, 2019]
Exhibit 99.2

**** 

**Report Of Independent**

**Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors

Structured Obligations Corporation

New York, New York

 

 

We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.

 

In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of Structured Obligations Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.

 

 

        /s/ RubinBrown LLP         

 

Overland Park, Kansas 

March 6, 2012

 

----
§ 203.402a Reimbursement for uncollected interest. The mortgagee shall be entitled to receive an allowance in the insurance settlement for unpaid mortgage interest if the mortgagor fails to meet the requirements of a forbearance agreement entered into pursuant to § 203.614 and this failure continues for a period of 60 days. The interest allowance shall be computed to: ( a ) The earliest of the applicable following dates, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 ) The date of the initiation of foreclosure;
( 2 ) The date of the acquisition of the property by the mortgagee by means other than foreclosure;
( 3 ) The date the property was acquired by the Commissioner under a direct conveyance from the mortgagor;
( 4 ) Ninety days following the date the mortgagor fails to meet the requirements of the forbearance agreement, or such other date as the Commissioner may approve in writing prior to the expiration of the 90-day period; or
( 5 ) The date the mortgagee sends the mortgagor notice of eligibility to participate in the Pre-Foreclosure Sale procedure; or
( b ) The date foreclosure is initiated or a deed in lieu is obtained, or the date such actions were required by § 203.355(c), whichever is earlier, if the commencement of foreclosure within the time limits described in § 203.355(a), (b), (g), or (h) is precluded by: ( 1 ) The laws of the State in which the mortgaged property is located; or
( 2 ) Federal bankruptcy law.
[60 FR 57678, Nov. 16, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 35019, July 3, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           365
<OTHER-SE>                                   (182,977)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Pauline Thum et al., Respondents, v. Edward Zraick et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion by respondents for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ KIMBERLY K. SCHAEFERKimberly K. SchaeferChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT NUMBER 11



             INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)



                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                                March 31        
                                                       -------------------------
                                                           1997          1996
                                                       -----------   -----------


Pro forma net income ...............................   $ 1,431,741   $   422,827
                                                       ===========   ===========

Shares:
  Weighted average number of common shares
     outstanding ...................................     9,747,358     6,404,020
  Assuming conversion of options issued and
     outstanding ...................................     4,881,954     4,771,062
                                                       -----------   -----------

  Weighted average common and
     common stock equivalent shares outstanding ....    14,629,312    11,175,082
                                                       ===========   ===========

Pro forma net income per share .....................   $      0.10   $      0.04
                                                       ===========   ===========



























                                      14
##### 

# Modified Mercalli Intensity Maps for the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake Plotted in ShakeMap Format

## *By* John Boatwright and Howard Bundock

This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with the U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code.  Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
US Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, MS 977, Menlo Park, CA  94025

This website presents Modified Mercalli Intensity maps for the great San Francisco earthquake of April 18, 1906. These new maps combine two important developments. First, we have re-evaluated and relocated the damage and shaking reports compiled by Lawson (1908). These reports yield intensity estimates for more than 600 sites and constitute the largest set of intensities ever compiled for a single earthquake. Second, we use the recent ShakeMap methodology to map these intensities. The resulting MMI intensity maps are remarkably detailed and eloquently depict the enormous power and damage potential of this great earthquake.  

**Intensity Maps**

Interpolated MMI intensity maps for the  M = 7.8 San Francisco earthquake that can be compared with Stover and Coffman's (1993) contoured MMI intensity map and with the interpolated intensity map for the M = 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake.

**1906 MMI Scale**

The 1906 earthquake was so large that the shaking effects do not fit Richter's (1958) Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. We enumerate the characteristic effects observed in the 1906 earthquake and discuss how the MMI intensity scale was revised for this earthquake. 

**Site List**

The California Earthquake Commission received reports from many towns and rural post offices that have since disappeared, been renamed, or been inundated by reservoirs. We compile the geographic and geologic information for all the sites, as well as an extensive set of notes that describe locating and assigning intensities at the most important sites.

**Explanatory Text**

Explanation of the mechanics of plotting MMI intensity maps in ShakeMap format, and how the 1906 intensities attenuate with distance from the fault.

For questions about the content of this report, contact Jack Boatwright.

**Version history**

| Help   | PDF help   | Publications main page | Open-File   Reports for 2005 || Privacy   Statement | Disclaimer   | Accessibility || Geologic Division | Earthquake Hazards Program  |This report is available only on the Web| Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey |URL of this page: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1135/Maintained by: Michael DigglesDate created: April 5, 2005Date last modified: January 23, 2007 (mfd)
### §7192. Judicial review

#### (a) Agency action

Judicial review of agency action taken under any law the functions of which are vested by law in, or transferred or delegated to the Secretary, the Commission or any officer, employee, or component of the Department shall, notwithstanding such vesting, transfer, or delegation, be made in the manner specified in or for such law.

#### (b) Review by district court of United States; removal

Notwithstanding the amount in controversy, the district courts of the United States shall have exclusive original jurisdiction of all other cases or controversies arising exclusively under this chapter, or under rules, regulations, or orders issued exclusively thereunder, other than any actions taken to implement or enforce any rule, regulation, or order by any officer of a State or local government agency under this chapter, except that nothing in this section affects the power of any court of competent jurisdiction to consider, hear, and determine in any proceeding before it any issue raised by way of defense (other than a defense based on the unconstitutionality of this chapter or the validity of action taken by any agency under this chapter). If in any such proceeding an issue by way of defense is raised based on the unconstitutionality of this chapter or the validity of agency action under this chapter, the case shall be subject to removal by either party to a district court of the United States in accordance with the applicable provisions of chapter 89 of title 28. Cases or controversies arising under any rule, regulation, or order of any officer of a State or local government agency may be heard in either (A) any appropriate State court, or (B) without regard to the amount in controversy, the district courts of the United States.

#### (c) Litigation supervision by Attorney General

Subject to the provisions of section 7171(i) of this title and notwithstanding any other law, the litigation of the Department shall be subject to the supervision of the Attorney General pursuant to chapter 31 of title 28. The Attorney General may authorize any attorney of the Department to conduct any civil litigation of the Department in any Federal court except the Supreme Court.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title V, §502, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 589.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565, known as the Department of Energy Organization Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7101 of this title and Tables.
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Attachments:
Hi, ·. Adams, Kevin (OST)

. Friday, April 05, 2013 9:18 AM

Tatitlek IRA Council/Tribal Administrator; Alaska DOT, Steven D. Hatter '; AlaskaAirTransit@alaska.net; Alaska DOT, Richard Sewell; Alaska DOT, Linda Bustamante

; Reeve AirAlaska, Mike Reeve; Security Aviation, Jason Ward ; USPS, Joe McDonald; USPS, Lochmann, Robert Request for Comments regarding proposals for EAS at Tatilek, AK Proposal ofAlaska AirTransit.pdf; Proposal of Reeve Air Alaska.pdf; Proposal of Security Avaition.pdf

Attached above are copies ofthe three timely-filed proposalsfor Essential Air Service (EAS) atTatitlek. We are currently reviewingthose proposals. These proposals are directlyfrom the carriers and will soon be reflected in the Docket, which you may access through Regualtions.gov at DOT-OST-2013-0030, along with other pertinent information on this proceeding. Community comments, especially ofvillage officials, are acritically important element in our carrierselection decision. We ask thatyou get backto us, preferably by email, no laterthan May 2, 2013. We will docketthis email, as well as any replies. In brief, lookatthe proposals, and ifyou have any questions, call any ofthe three carriers or me, and get back to us by the deadline, May2. Best, Kevin Adams Industry Economist 202-366-1047

1