alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 75861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-3704; MB Docket No. 04-338, RM-11061]


Radio Broadcasting Service; Nevada City, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the request of Dana J. Puopolo, allots 
Channel 297A at Nevada City, California, as the community's first FM 
commercial broadcast service. See 69 FR 54612, published September 9, 
2004. Channel 297A can be allotted to Nevada City in compliance with 
the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements, provided 
there is a site restriction of 4.5 kilometers (2.8 miles) north of the 
community. The reference coordinates for Channel 297A at Nevada City 
are 39-18-00 North Latitude and 121-00-00 West Longitude. A filing 
window for Channel 297A at Nevada City, California will not be opened 
at this time. Instead, the issue of opening a filing window for this 
channel will be addressed by the Commission in a subsequent order.

DATES: Effective January 18, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen McLean, Media Bureau, (202) 418-
2738.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 04-338, adopted December 1, 2004, and 
released December 3, 2004. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at 
the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 Twelfth Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this 
decision may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room 
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and 
Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the General Accounting 
Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334 and 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under California, is 
amended by adding Nevada City, Channel 297A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-27793 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Document

 Exhibit 10.39
Corporate Headquarters                                                                                       
Equinix, Inc.
One Lagoon Drive                                        
Redwood City, CA  94065
Equinix.com
+1 650 598 6000 Main













September 21, 2022


Charles Meyers
Equinix, Inc,
One Lagoon Drive
Redwood City, CA 94065


Dear Charles:


On October 12, 2018, you entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) with Equinix, Inc. (“Equinix”) relating to your appointment as Equinix’s Chief Executive Officer and President.


The Letter Agreement stated that your position would be based at Equinix’s corporate headquarters in Redwood City, California, and that Equinix would assist you and your family with your relocation (the “Relocation”) by offering the benefits outlined in such Letter Agreement.


This letter seeks to acknowledge that while efforts were made by you towards your relocation, and costs were incurred by you in connection therewith, at this time your position is no longer required to be based at Equinix’s corporate headquarters in Redwood City, California and the Letter Agreement is hereby terminated.


Sincerely,


 /s/ Peter Van Camp_____________________________
Peter Van Camp                   
Executive Chairman




Agreed to and Acknowledged:


_/s/ Charles Meyers______________________________
Charles Meyers                   
President & CEO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EBER GENE RUTH,

Petitioner,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Respondent. /

No. C 09-1861 SI (pr)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Eber Gene Ruth, a prisoner at Mule Creek State Prison, filed a pro se petition for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition is not his first federal habeas petition

concerning his 1993 murder conviction from the Del Norte County Superior Court. His first

habeas petition was filed on July 24, 1996 and denied on the merits on July 25, 1997. See Ruth

v. Cambra, N. D. Cal. No. C 96-2626 SBA. Three later petitions filed by Ruth were dismissed

without prejudice as successive. See Ruth v. Cambra, No. C 01-1502 SBA; Ruth v. Warden, No.

C 02-1124 SBA; Ruth v. Warden, No. C 02-1578 SBA. He also sought permission from the

Ninth Circuit to file a second or successive petition, but the Ninth Circuit denied his request.

See Ruth v. Warden, Ninth Cir. No. 06-74362. 

A second or successive petition may not be filed in this court unless the petitioner first

obtains from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit an order authorizing this

court to consider the petition. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Ruth has not obtained such an order

from the Ninth Circuit. This court will not entertain a new petition from Ruth until he first

Case 3:09-cv-01861-SI Document 8 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

obtains permission from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to file such a petition. This

action is DISMISSED without prejudice to Ruth filing a petition in this court after he obtains

the necessary order from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 

If Ruth wants to attempt to obtain the necessary order from the Ninth Circuit, he should

very clearly mark the first page of his document as a "MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING

DISTRICT COURT TO CONSIDER SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION PURSUANT

TO 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A)" rather than labeling it as a habeas petition because the Ninth

Circuit clerk's office is apt to simply forward to this court any document labeled as a habeas

petition. He also should mail the motion to the Ninth Circuit (at 95 Seventh Street, San

Francisco, CA 94103), rather than to this court. In his motion to the Ninth Circuit, he should

explain how he meets the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).

Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. (Docket # 6.) Petitioner's motion to

appeal is DENIED. (Docket # 7.) 

The clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 5, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01861-SI Document 8 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 241.640 Employment discrimination prohibited.

Any contract or subcontract executed for the performance of constructing the improvements to the project shall provide that there shall be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, disability, age, or national origin.

[61 FR 14417, Apr. 1, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1





(a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Interim Chief Executive Officer.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eldad Eilam, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Eldad Eilam


Eldad Eilam


Interim Chief Executive Officer


August 14, 2012







Exhibit 32.1







(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Interim Chief Financial Officer.







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dixon, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert Dixon


Robert Dixon


Interim Chief Financial Officer


August 14, 2012
§ 401.560 Property management standards. ( a ) *General.* Each PAE is required by section 518 of MAHRA to establish management standards consistent with industry standards and HUD guidelines. The management standards must be included or referenced in the Restructuring Plan.
( b ) *HUD guidelines.* At a minimum, the PAE's management standards must require the project management to: ( 1 ) Protect the physical integrity of the property over the long term through preventative maintenance, repair, or replacement;
( 2 ) Ensure that the building and grounds are routinely cleaned;
( 3 ) Maintain good relations with the tenants;
( 4 ) Protect the financial integrity of the project by operating the property with competitive and reasonable costs and maintaining appropriate property and liability insurance at all times;
( 5 ) Take all necessary measures to ensure the tenants' physical safety; and
( 6 ) Comply with other provisions that are required by HUD, including termination of the management agent for cause.
( c ) *Conflicts of interest.* The PAE management standards must also conform to any guidelines established by HUD, and industry standards, governing conflicts of interest between owners, managers, and contractors.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4374 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the increased limitation on the cover over of the tax on distilled spirits to Puerto Rico 

and the Virgin Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2012 

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN (for herself and Mr. PIERLUISI) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the increased limitation on the cover over of the tax 

on distilled spirits to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF INCREASED LIMITATION ON 

4 COVER OVER OF TAX ON DISTILLED SPIRITS 

5 TO PUERTO RICO AND THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 7652(f) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘January 1, 2012’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2014’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4374 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to distilled spirits brought into the 

3 United States after December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 3.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         309,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,565,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,079
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,236,115
<PP&E>                                       5,326,862
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,056,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,675,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,202,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,638,531
<OTHER-SE>                                   (613,358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,459,197
<SALES>                                     15,588,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,588,828
<CGS>                                        9,071,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,806,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                735,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                   279,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            455,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   455,937
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:03:57-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 21.1

List of subsidiaries of JER Investors Trust Inc.



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1 Depositor, LLC
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, Limited
| | - |  | ---------------------------

| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, LLC
| | - |  | -----------------------

| |  |  | JER TRS Holding Company Inc.
| | - |  | ----------------------------

| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company I LLC
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------

| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company II LLC
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

In the Matter of: AVIATION TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

FAA Order No. 2013

- 6

FDMS No. FAA

- 2011

- 0682 1

Served: September 10, 2013

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 2

By notice served on September 5, 2013, Respondent Aviation Technical Services, Inc.,

withdrew its Notice of Appeal from the written initial decision issued by Administrative Law

Judge Richard C. Goodwin on May 17, 2013. Respondent explained that it was withd rawing its

Notice of Appeal pursuant to a settlement agreement with Complainant.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT : Respondent’s appeal is dismissed.

MICHAEL P. HUERTA, ADMINISTRATOR

Federal Aviation Administration

[Original signed by Vicki S. Leemo n]

VICKI S. LEEMON 3

Manager, Adjudication Branch

1 Generally, materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases or

materials under seal) are also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov . See 14 C.F.R.

§ 13.210(e)(1).

2 The Administrator’s civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the rules of practice, and

other information, are available on the Internet at the following address:

www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/pol_adjudication /AGC400/

Civil_Penalty . See 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West publishes Federal

Aviation Decisions . Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw

(FTRAN

- FAA database). For additional informatio n, see the Web site.

3 Issued under authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation by

memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 (see 57 Fed.

Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and redelega ted by the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation to the Manager,

Adjudication Branch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
#### § 232.522 Inspection fee.

See 24 CFR 200.40 titled “HUD fees” and 200.41 titled “Maximum mortgage fees and charges” for maximum fees and charges applicable to mortgages insured under 24 CFR part 232.

[80 FR 48027, Aug. 11, 2015]
### §§616aaaa to 616ffff–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616aaaa, Pub. L. 90–503, §1, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 93–493, title III, §301, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1492; Pub. L. 103–434, title IV, §402(a), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4536, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of the Mountain Park project, Oklahoma.

Section 616bbbb, Pub. L. 90–503, §2, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 853, related to repayment of costs and the interest rate.

Section 616cccc, Pub. L. 90–503, §3, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 854, related to transfer of the care, maintenance, and operation of project works to water users' organization.

Section 616dddd, Pub. L. 90–503, §4, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 854, related to soil survey and land classification.

Section 616eeee, Pub. L. 90–503, §5, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 854, related to conservation and development of fish and wildlife and enhancement of recreational opportunities in connection with this project.

Section 616ffff, Pub. L. 90–503, §6, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 854, authorized appropriations for this project.

Section 616ffff–1, Pub. L. 93–493, title III, §302, Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1492, authorized additional appropriations for this project.

Section 616ffff–2, Pub. L. 90–503, §7, as added Pub. L. 103–434, title IV, §402(b), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4536, authorized reallocation of project costs.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50844

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN FRANCISCO MIRANDA-MARTINEZ, also known as Alfredo Contreras,

also known as Juan Miranda, also known as Juan Francisco Miranda, also

known as Alfredo Sanchez-Martinez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-545-ALL

Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Francisco MirandaMartinez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50844

2

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,002,259
<SECURITIES>                                   [BLANK]
<RECEIVABLES>                              302,302,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,659
<INVENTORY>                                    [BLANK]
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               [BLANK]
<PP&E>                                         [BLANK]
<DEPRECIATION>                                 [BLANK]
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             307,003,657
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,841,965
<BONDS>                                        [BLANK]
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          [BLANK]
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 286,161,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               307,003,657
<SALES>                                        [BLANK]
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,507,577
<CGS>                                          [BLANK]
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  745,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,781,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             [BLANK]
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,742,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                   [BLANK]
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,742,942
<DISCONTINUED>                                 [BLANK]
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                [BLANK]
<CHANGES>                                      [BLANK]
<NET-INCOME>                                10,742,942
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                29,616.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  [BLANK]
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER III—INSTITUTION AND CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECTS
§ 220.811 Date of default. For the purposes of §§ 220.800 *et seq.,* the date of default shall be considered as: ( a ) The date of the first uncorrected failure to perform a covenant or obligation under the note or security instrument; or
( b ) The date of the first failure to make a monthly payment which subsequent payments by the borrower are insufficient to cover when applied to the overdue monthly payments in the order in which they became due.
#### § 401.200 Who may be a PAE?

A PAE must qualify under the definition in section 512(10) of MAHRA. It must not have any outstanding violations of civil rights laws, determined in accordance with criteria in use by HUD. If the PAE is a private entity, whether nonprofit or for-profit, it must enter into a partnership with a public purpose entity, which may include HUD. A PAE may delegate responsibilities only as agreed in the PRA.
#### § 242.3 Encouragement of certain programs.

The activities and functions provided for in this part shall be carried out so as to encourage provision of comprehensive health care, including outpatient and preventive care as well as hospitalization, to a defined population, and in the case of public and certain not-for-profit hospitals, to encourage programs that are undertaken to provide essential health care services to all residents of a community regardless of ability to pay.