alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3280.712 Marking. ( a ) Information on clearances, input rating, lighting and shutdown shall be attached to the appliances with the same permanence as the nameplate, and so located that it is easily readable when the appliance is properly installed or shutdown for transporting of manufactured home.
( b ) Each fuel-burning appliance shall bear permanent marking designating the type(s) of fuel for which it is listed.
### §§616ww to 616ww–5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616ww, Pub. L. 94–228, title III, §301, Mar. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 207, authorized construction of McKay Dam and Reservoir, Umatilla project, Oregon, and provided for allocation of costs.

Section 616ww–1, Pub. L. 94–228, title III, §302, Mar. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 207, authorized modifications to spillway structure of McKay Dam.

Section 616ww–2, Pub. L. 94–228, title III, §303, Mar. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 207, related to maximum storage capacity allocated for primary purpose of retaining and regulating flood control.

Section 616ww–3, Pub. L. 94–228, title III, §304, Mar. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 207, related to allocation of costs for modification of McKay Dam and to allocation of all other costs.

Section 616ww–4, Pub. L. 94–228, title III, §305, Mar. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 207, related to repayment contracts and reimbursable costs.

Section 616ww–5, Pub. L. 94–228, title III, §306, Mar. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 207, authorized appropriations for this project.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Richard Blass, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: August 16, 2004.


Richard Blass


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) I.D. No. 1101020 478 ) Robert R. Meades , ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER
Submitted: January 22 , 202 4 Decided: Fe bruary 1 , 202 4 Upon Consideration of Motion for Correction of an Illegal Sentence , DENIED.

John Donahue , Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Department of Justice, Georgetown, Delaware, Attorney for the State of Delaware.

Robert R. Meades , James T . Vaughn Correctional Center , Georgetown, Delaware, Pro Se

.

CONNER, J.2

This 1 st day of February, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant ’ s second Superior Court Criminal Rule 35 motion, it appears to the Court that: 1) The Defendant, Robert R. Meades, filed a Motion for Correction of an Illegal Sentence pursuant to Rule 35(a) . It should also be noted he filed his fourth Rule 61 motion on January 18, 2024. Both motions essentially allege he was not competent to understand the plea proceedings. These claims were denie d by this
Court in his first Rule 61 motion and subsequent Rule 61 motions. 1 2) Rule 35(a) motions are limited to only allegations of errors with the sentence itself. 2 It “ is not an appropriate means to argue alleged errors in the underl ying conviction

. ” 3 Also, Rule 35(a) cannot be invok ed to re

- li tig ate his Rule 61 claims that were previously denied. 4 The Court finds this is exactly what the Defendant is attempting by filing this Rule 35( a) motion. Four the reasons state d above, the Defendant ’ s Rule 35 (a) Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence is DENIED

. I T IS SO ORDERED. 

### /s/ Mark H. Conner Mark H. Conner, Judge cc: Prothonotary

1 State v. Robert M

eades , 223 A.3d 416 ( Del. 2019)

. 2 Nichols v. Sta te , 913 A.2d 570 (Del. 2006)

. 3 Id

. 4 Laboy v. State , 871 A.2d 1128 (Del. 2005).
```

[House Report 105-54]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-54
_______________________________________________________________________

                 PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF 
 
  HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 62, TAX LIMITATION CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

                                _______
                                

   April 14, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 113]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 113, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               Brief Summary of Provisions of Resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of House 
Joint Resolution 62, the ``Tax Limitation Constitutional 
Amendment'' under a modified closed rule. The rule provides 
three hours of debate divided equally between the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary.
    The rule provides for consideration in the House. It 
provides that the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute, modified by the amendment specified in this report, 
will be considered as adopted.
    The rule provides that the previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the joint resolution, as amended, and 
on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except as specified. It provides for an 
amendment if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee, 
which will be considered as read, and which will be debatable 
for one hour equally divided between the proponent and an 
opponent.
    Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with 
or without instructions.

         The Amendment Considered as Adopted by the Resolution

    In section 1 of the proposed amendment to the Constitution, 
after ``de minimis amount.'' insert ``For the purposes of 
determining any increase in the internal revenue under this 
section, there shall be excluded any increase resulting from 
the lowering of an effective rate of any tax.''.

                                

```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOSE ANTONIO TORRES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3878

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hardee County; Marcus J. Ezell, Judge. 

Jose Antonio Torres, pro se. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Fact Sheet

SOCIAL SECURITY 

SSA Press Office 440 Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235 410-965-8904 

FAX 410-966-9973 

Social Security Is Important to American Indians and 

Alaska Natives 

Social Security is neutral with respect to race or ethnicity – individuals with identical 

earnings histories are treated the same in terms of benefits. This Fact Sheet is provided by 

the Social Security Administration to highlight how American Indians and Alaska Natives

benefit from the Social Security program and how certain demographic characteristics of 

American Indians and Alaska Natives compare with the entire population. 

• The Social Security system is progressive in that lower-wage earners receive a higher 

percentage benefit than higher-wage earners do. The system returns a greater percentage 

of pre-retirement earnings to a lower-wage worker than to a higher-wage worker. 

American Indians who are low-wage workers receive back more benefits in relation to 

past earnings than do high-wage earners. 

o In 2007, the median earnings of working-age American Indians who worked fulltime year-round were about $30,000, compared to $40,000 for all working-age 

people. 

• American Indians benefit from the guaranteed benefit that is annually adjusted for 

inflation. With longer life expectancies, elderly American Indians will live more years in 

retirement and benefit from Social Security’s cost-of-living protections. 

o American Indians tend to have higher life expectancies at age 65 than the majority 

of the population. 

 American Indian men who are age 65 in 2005 can expect to live to age 84, 

compared to age 81 for all men. 

 American Indian women who are age 65 in 2005 can expect to live to age 

88, compared to age 85 for all women. 

• In 2007, the average annual Social Security income received by American Indian men 65 

years and older was $11,135 and for women it was $8,992. 

• In 2007, among American Indians receiving Social Security, 23 percent of elderly 

married couples and 48 percent of elderly unmarried persons relied on Social Security for 

90 percent or more of their income. 
• Today, American Indians and Alaska natives make up one percent of the U.S. population. 

Our website at www.socialsecurity.gov/aian contains more information of interest to American 

Indians and Alaska Natives. 

This fact sheet is designed to provide general information and may not apply to all individuals 

within each segment of the American Indian and Alaska Natives populations.
#### HOFFMAN et al., Respondents, v. ABEL, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Samuel V. Hoffman and others against Samuel V. Abel, impleaded. W. L. Stone, for appellant. P. R. Towne, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### §125. Annexation of discontinued district to adjacent district

Whenever the cost of collecting the revenue from the sales of the public lands in any land district is as much as one-third of the whole amount of revenue collected in such district, it may be lawful for the President, if, in his opinion, not incompatible with the public interest, to discontinue the land office in such district, and to annex the same to some other adjoining land district.

(R.S. §2250.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2250 derived from act Mar. 3, 1853, ch. 97, §1, 10 Stat. 189, 194.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation to Secretary of the Interior of authority vested in President by this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 10250, June 5, 1951, 16 F.R. 5385, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2





            Famous Dave's Announces 2002 Earnings Growth Expectations

EDEN PRAIRIE, MN NOVEMBER 14, 2001 - Famous Dave's of America, Inc. (Nasdaq:
DAVE) announced today that it expects revenues of $104 to $109 million in fiscal
2002. The Company anticipates 8-10 new company owned and operated restaurants
and 12-15 franchise owned and operated restaurants will open in 2002. Resulting
earnings per share are expected to be between $0.27 and $0.30.

"With our recently announced equity placement, we have a capital structure in
place to continue with our profitable growth strategy." said Martin O'Dowd,
President and CEO of Famous Dave's. "2002 promises to be an exciting year for
our Company as we look forward to building additional shareholder value."


ABOUT FAMOUS DAVE'S OF AMERICA

Famous Dave's of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: Dave) owns, operates and franchises
barbeque restaurants. The company currently owns 37 locations and franchises an
additional 15 units in Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota,
Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin and has signed
development agreements for an additional 57 franchised locations. Its menu
features award-winning barbecued and grilled meats, an ample selection of
salads, side items, sandwiches and unique desserts.

Certain matters discussed within this press release, including statements
regarding revenue and profit forecasts, new restaurant sites, restaurant
openings and expansion plans, are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although Famous Dave's
of America, Inc. believes the expectation reflected in any forward-looking
statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that
its expectation will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from Famous Dave's expectation include financial performance,
restaurant industry conditions, execution of restaurant development and
construction programs, changes in local or national economic conditions,
availability of financing and other risks detailed from time to time in the
Company's SEC reports.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35417-35418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday July 15, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered

    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or

[[Page 35418]]

dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-15301 Filed 6-15-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### § 3286.801 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart I is to establish the requirements that must be met by a state to implement and administer its own installation program, either as part of its approved state plan or under this subpart, in such a way that the state would not be covered by the HUD-administered installation program. This subpart I also establishes the procedure for determining whether a state installation program meets the requirements of the Act for a qualifying installation program that will operate in lieu of the HUD-administered installation program.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1254

NASSER HASSAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

L. A. HEDRICK; S. B. MASON; C. W. TAGGERT; Z.

D. TAYLOR; J. M. TRAVIS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

STAN G. BARRY; JOHN/JANE DOES, ##1-10;

JOHN/JANE DOES, ##11-20,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (1:05-cv-00385-TSE-LO)

Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 26, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nasser Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, O’CONNELL,

O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Nasser Hassan appeals the district court’s orders

entering judgment in accordance with a jury verdict and granting

summary judgment in favor of another defendant. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Hassan’s motion to remand and affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §950. Right of way to canal and ditch companies for irrigation purposes; additional grants

In addition to the rights of way granted by sections 946 to 949 of this title, and subject to the conditions and restrictions therein contained, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to grant permits or easements for not to exceed five acres of ground adjoining the right of way at each of the locations, to be determined by the Secretary of the Interior, to be used for the erection thereon of dwellings or other buildings or corrals for the convenience of those engaged in the care and management of the works provided for by said sections: Provided, That this section shall not apply to lands within national forests.

(Mar. 1, 1921, ch. 93, 41 Stat. 1194.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Measuring violence-related attitudes,beliefs, and behaviors among youths : a compendium of assessment tools
 
 
Introduction | Section 1 | Section2 | Section 3 | Section 4
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.7952:V 81
Item Number:0494-N (online)
CGP System Number:000488720
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 1, 2017********
### §617u. Lease of reserved lands in Boulder City, Nevada; disposition of revenues

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and empowered, under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, to establish rental rates for the lease of reserved lands of the United States situate within the exterior boundaries of Boulder City, Nevada, and, without prior advertising, to enter into leases therefor at not less than rates so established and for periods not exceeding fifty-three years from the date of such leases: Provided, That all revenues which may accrue to the United States under the provisions of such leases shall be deposited in the Treasury and credited to the Colorado River Dam fund established by section 617a of this title.

(June 18, 1940, ch. 395, 54 Stat. 437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Boulder Canyon Project Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Boulder City Act of 1958

Public Law 85–900, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1726, provided for disposal of certain Federal property in Boulder City for purposes of establishment of a municipal corporation incorporated under laws of Nevada.
### §938. Lands excepted

Sections 934 to 939 of this title shall not apply to any lands within the limits of any military, park, or Indian reservation, or other lands especially reserved from sale, unless such right of way shall be provided for by treaty-stipulation or by Act of Congress passed prior to March 3, 1875.

(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 152, §5, 18 Stat. 483.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FAMOUS
DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MARCH 29, 1998 AS FILED ON FORM 10-QSB
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                       3,578,000
<SECURITIES>                                 7,089,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    603,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,016,000
<PP&E>                                      29,458,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,588,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,886,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,080,000
<BONDS>                                      1,293,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    42,799,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,286,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,886,000
<SALES>                                      7,734,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,734,000
<CGS>                                        2,731,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,128,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (135,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,259,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,259,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      120,000
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,379,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.50)
        

</TABLE>