alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 96.59 Review of decisions to deny accreditation or approval. ( a ) There is no administrative or judicial review of an accrediting entity's decision to deny an application for accreditation or approval. As provided in § 96.79, a decision to deny for these purposes includes: ( 1 ) A denial of the agency's or person's initial application for accreditation or approval;
( 2 ) A denial of an application made after cancellation or refusal to renew by the accrediting entity; and
( 3 ) A denial of an application made after cancellation or debarment by the Secretary.
( b ) The agency or person may petition the accrediting entity for reconsideration of a denial. The accrediting entity must establish internal review procedures that provide an opportunity for an agency or person to petition for reconsideration of the denial.
#### Marshman *v.*The State.

November 23, 1912.

Beck, *J.*

1. In regard to the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleged misconduct on the part of the jurors in separating while deliberating on the case, and in holding conversations with persons other than members of the jury, and in otherwise misconducting themselves, and on the part of the officer in charge of the jury in permitting this, the evidence adduced before the presiding judge on the hearing of the motion for a new trial was conflicting, and there was no error in overruling the motion as to said *ground. Jones*v. *State,*136 *Ga.*157 (71 S. E. 6).

2. In an act to regulate and prescribe certain matters of review procedure and practice in the courts of this State, approved August 21, 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 149), it is declared that no judgment of a trial court in a criminal case shall be reversed by the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals for lack of proof of venue, save where the particular point has been specifically raised by a ground of the original or amended motion for a new trial. In the present case the particular point, that there was no proof of venue of the crime alleged to have been committed, was not raised by any ground of the original or amended motion.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*865Indictment for murder. Before Judge Thomas. Colquitt superior court. August 6, 1912.

*W. F. Way*and *M. 0. Autrey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas 8. Felder, attorney-general, John A. Willces, solicitor-general,*and *Alfred B. Kline,*contra.

ERRATA. Page 140, line 14 from bottom: for 6080 read 6089. Page 359, line 15 from bottom: for 708 read 780. Page 669, line 16 from top: for “or” read “and.”
### §15. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–449, §7(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2444

Section, acts Apr. 14, 1910, ch. 160, §6, 36 Stat. 299; Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–670, §6(e)(1)(C), 80 Stat. 939, provided that it was the duty of the Secretary of Transportation to enforce the provisions of sections 11 to 16 of this title as to equipment of each car with safety appliances and that all powers theretofore granted to the Interstate Commerce Commission were extended to the Secretary for the purpose of such enforcement. See section 501(b) of Title 49, Transportation.
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Joseph
      Restivo, Chief Financial Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:




(i)
      The
      Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
      March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)
      The
      information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Joseph RestivoJoseph
                Restivo
              Chief
                Financial Officer


Dated:
      May 11, 2007
§ 570.203 Special economic development activities. A recipient may use CDBG funds for special economic development activities in addition to other activities authorized in this subpart that may be carried out as part of an economic development project. Guidelines for selecting activities to assist under this paragraph are provided at § 570.209. The recipient must ensure that the appropriate level of public benefit will be derived pursuant to those guidelines before obligating funds under this authority. Special activities authorized under this section do not include assistance for the construction of new housing. Activities eligible under this section may include costs associated with project-specific assessment or remediation of known or suspected environmental contamination. Special economic development activities include: ( a ) The acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of commercial or industrial buildings, structures, and other real property equipment and improvements, including railroad spurs or similar extensions. Such activities may be carried out by the recipient or public or private nonprofit subrecipients.
( b ) The provision of assistance to a private for-profit business, including, but not limited to, grants, loans, loan guarantees, interest supplements, technical assistance, and other forms of support, for any activity where the assistance is appropriate to carry out an economic development project, excluding those described as ineligible in § 570.207(a). In selecting businesses to assist under this authority, the recipient shall minimize, to the extent practicable, displacement of existing businesses and jobs in neighborhoods.
( c ) Economic development services in connection with activities eligible under this section, including, but not limited to, outreach efforts to market available forms of assistance; screening of applicants; reviewing and underwriting applications for assistance; preparation of all necessary agreements; management of assisted activities; and the screening, referral, and placement of applicants for employment opportunities generated by CDBG-eligible economic development activities, including the costs of providing necessary training for persons filling those positions.
[53 FR 34439, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 1944, Jan. 5, 1995; 71 FR 30035, May 24, 2006]
### §7385b. Payment in full settlement of claims

Except as provided in part E, the acceptance by an individual of payment of compensation under part B with respect to a covered employee shall be in full satisfaction of all claims of or on behalf of that individual against the United States, against a Department of Energy contractor or subcontractor, beryllium vendor, or atomic weapons employer, or against any person with respect to that person's performance of a contract with the United States, that arise out of an exposure referred to in section 7385 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3643], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–509; Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3162(c), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–375 substituted "Except as provided in part E, the acceptance" for "The acceptance".
!

 !
 !!

!"#$%&'
()*( 

"*+,&-./012 	
3

,04./056")7$88&0$9

: 
!
 &-;

 ;"<"=*$0.$

+$,>%09?!"8+@%=0+" 


$8$6/%0$'13(
	

99%=0$A@%=8"+09+@@


 2

0,=$B &"8$09+0$12 
3

"0,=$B&*"8$09+0$5,8"6+6$=&)%>

"=)!&2$88%8+12 
3

>"=)&7$88%8+5,8"6+6$=&)%>

 13

0+*$=#+9A*$0.$

"#9"8%89%?!"8+@%=0+" 


$8$6/%0$'13	(

")#+>+8$'13	(

99%=0$A#@%=$@$0,"09

!
 2

?!&

"0+$8&%#9$=12 
3

,@%#9$=5>B$&)%>

!/=+#9%6/$=&2=+</912 3

!
:C  

	
 %0-"=>"0*$0.$?.+9$

=*+0$?!"8+@%=0+"
(	

$8$6/%0$'1

3	(

")#+>+8$'1

3	(
	

99%=0$A#@%=$@$0,"09


 !;


;

! !
&

 !!



; !
!


 !!
 



 2?

8"+09+@@?

*#&


 !;


;

! !
&?"$8"B"=$)%=6%="9+%0?$9

"8&?

$@$0,"09#&

  !
!&

!"#$%&'
()*( 

 	
  


    


  

	    



Case 3:09-cv-02112-RS Document 64 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 3














	




















	




















	



  




 
 

!

 !
 !!

(( !"#$%&'
()*( 

.=#."099%!+*+8&&( "0,(?8"+09+@@=$<%=A2$0,$=1D2$0,$=E3"0,,$@$0,"09#

0@+0$%0$)/0%8%<+$#%=9/>$=+)"!%=6&1D0@+0$%0E3"0,+8+)%0"7%="9%=+$#?0)&1D+8+)%0

"7#E31)%88$)9+*$8A?D$@$0,"09#E3?9/=%.</)%.0#$8?/$=$7A#9+6.8"9$"0,=$F.$#9"0
=,$=9%13

$G9$0,9/$9+>$@%=$@$0,"09#9%#$=*$9/$+=+0*"8+,+9A)%09$09+%0#7A#+G9A13,"A#@=%> "A?

.69%"0,+0)8.,+0<.8A
?"0,13)/"0<$9/$,"9$#$9@%=9/$!%.=9H#!"#$"0"<$>$09

!%0@$=$0)$+09/+#")9+%0@=%> "A?149&%&39%.8A?%="##%%09/$=$"@9$="#

9/+#>"99$=)"07$/$"=,&

%%,)".#$$G+#9#@%=9/+#=$F.$#9&
06=+8??9/$$@$0,"09#$")/@+8$,">%9+%09%

#9=+4$2$0,$=H#+0@=+0<$>$09)%09$09+%0#"0,9%,+#>+##9/+#)"#$6.=#."099%$,$="8.8$%@!+*+8

=%)$,.=$ 149&%#&	 "0,3&
0"A??"<+#9="9$.,<$8%A,/$8,"/$"=+0<%09/$

$@$0,"09H#>%9+%0#"0,,$)+,$,9%9"4$9/$$@$0,"09#H>%9+%0#.0,$=#.7>+##+%0149&%&3&%

,"9$?"<+#9="9$.,<$8%A,/"#0%9A$9+##.$,"0%=,$=%0$@$0,"09#H>%9+%0#?"0,9/$=$@%=$9/$

6"=9+$#,%0%940%B B/$9/$=2$0,$=H#+0@=+0<$>$09)%09$09+%0#B+887$#9=+)4$0"0,B/$9/$=9/+#)"#$

B+887$,+#>+##$,&0*+$B %@9/$#$@")9#?9/$6"=9+$#"<=$$"0,#9+6.8"9$"#@%88%B#'

& /$,$",8+0$@%=$@$0,"09#9%#$=*$9/$+=+0*"8+,+9A)%09$09+%0##/"887$$G9$0,$,7A

,"A#@=%> "A?.69%"0,+0)8.,+0<.8A
?I"0,

& /$!"#$"0"<$>$09!%0@$=$0)$#/"887$,$8"A$,.09+8.8A?%="##%%0

9/$=$"@9$="#9/+#>"99$=)"07$/$"=,&


 &

"9$,'"A
? : 
!
 &-;

2A' J#J  	


"*+,&-./0

99%=0$A#@%=8"+09+@@


 2

Case 3:09-cv-02112-RS Document 64 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 3














	




















	




















	



  




 
 

!

 !
 !!

(( !"#$%&'
()*( 

"9$,'"A
?  13

2A' J#J
  

"=)!&2$88%8+

99%=0$A#@%=$@$0,"09

!
 2

?!&

"9$,'"A
? )
:C  

2A' J#J  

"0+$8&%#9$=

99%=0$A#@%=$@$0,"09


 !;


;

! !
&


 
?
 
&

"9$,'

;
&!; 2


 !

Case 3:09-cv-02112-RS Document 64 Filed 05/20/10 Page 3 of 3
### §3311. Destruction of records outside continental United States in time of war or when hostile action seems imminent; written report to Archivist

During a state of war between the United States and another nation, or when hostile action by a foreign power appears imminent, the head of an agency of the United States Government may authorize the destruction of records in his legal custody situated in a military or naval establishment, ship, or other depository outside the territorial limits of continental United States—

(1) the retention of which would be prejudicial to the interests of the United States or

(2) which occupy space urgently needed for military purposes and are, in his opinion, without sufficient administrative, legal, research, or other value to warrant their continued preservation.

Within six months after their disposal, the official who directed the disposal shall submit a written report to the Archivist in which he shall describe the character of the records and state when and where he disposed of them.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1301; Pub. L. 98–497, title I, §107(b)(23), (25)(C), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2290.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §376 (July 7, 1943, ch. 192, §11, 57 Stat. 382; June 30, 1949, ch. 288, title I, §104(a), 63 Stat. 381).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–497 substituted "Archivist" for "Administrator of General Services" in section catchline and text.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–497 effective Apr. 1, 1985, see section 301 of Pub. L. 98–497, set out as a note under section 2102 of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 315 

To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 

Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida (for herself and Mr. CRENSHAW) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North 

Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘John Milton 

Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan 

5 Street, Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United 

7 States Courthouse’’. 
2 

•HR 315 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson 

6 United States Courthouse’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS  SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS  AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND  IN THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR  THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997  AND  IS QUALIFIED IN  ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         21,873
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    83,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         5,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       154
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   294,757
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               57,771
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,091
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                24,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.92
        

</TABLE>
#### Melville Industrial Associates, Inc., Appellant, v Ramada Inns, Inc., Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia, to*declare the rights *of*the parties with respect to a certain agreement, plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 6, 1977, as dismissed the complaint after a nonjury trial. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting so much of the first paragraph thereof as provided for the dismissal of the complaint and substituting therefor a provision declaring that the agreement dated September 7, 1973 is no longer in force and effect and was validly terminated. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to respondent. The findings of fact are affirmed. Instead of dismissing the complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment, the court, if it reaches the merits, is required to make a declaration (see *Lanza v Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334). In all other respects the determination of Trial Term is supported by the record. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2015

s0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2015

150418

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150418

COA: 323338

Wayne CC: 08-011116-FC

CARLOS LEBRON BARTELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000158 27-JUN-2017 11:57 AM
§ 570.707 Applicability of rules and regulations. ( a ) *Entitlement public entities.* The provisions of subparts A, C, J, K and O of this part applicable to entitlement grants shall apply equally to guaranteed loan funds and other CDBG funds, except to the extent they are specifically modified or augmented by the provisions of this subpart.
( b ) *State-assisted public entities.* The provisions of subpart I of this part, and the requirements the State imposes on units of general local government receiving Community Development Block Grants or program income to the extent applicable, shall apply equally to guaranteed loan funds and Community Development Block Grants (including program income derived therefrom) administered by the State under the CDBG program, except to the extent they are specifically modified or augmented by the provisions of this subpart.
( c ) *Nonentitlement public entities eligible under subpart F of this part .* The provisions of subpart F of this part shall apply equally to guaranteed loan funds and other CDBG funds, except to the extent they are specifically modified or augmented by the provisions of this subpart.
HA US E R MO UNTA IN

B I G

P O T R E R O

Bell Vall ey

Potrero

Elementary School

Division

Potrero

Tecate

Canyon City

Campo

Creek

Potrero Creek

Potrero

Creek

OP94

3597

3598

3599

36

3601

3602

3603

3604

3605

3606

3607

3608

3596

3609000mN

3597

3598

3599

36

3601

3602

3603

3604

3605

3606

3607

3608

3596000mN

3609

537 538 539 540 541 542 544 536 545 546000mE

537 538 539 540 541 542 536000mE 544 545 546

6 450 000 FEET

6 480 000 FEET

1 770 000 FEET

1 800 000 FEET

32'30"

35'

32'30"

35'

35' 32'30"

35' 32'30" 116°37'30"

116°37'30"

32°37'30" 32°37'30"

116°30'

116°30' 32 32°30' °30'

SCALE 1:24 000

FEET

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

MILES

1 0.5 0 1

METERS

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

1000 500 0 1000 2000

THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

6 7 8

4 5

1 2 3 1 Barrett Lake

2 Morena Reservoir

3 Cameron Corners

4 Tecate

5 Campo

6

7

8

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Interstate Route

US Route

State Route

XW Interstate Route ./ US Route OP State Route

Local Road

00

NS

NR

00

NS

NR

OP94 OP94

U.S. National Grid

NS

NR

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

11S

36 00

SAN DIEGO CO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS

CALIFORNIA

BAJA CALIFORNIA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

OPEN-FILE REPORT 2008-1061

VERSION 1.0

POTRERO, CA

2007

PRELIMINARY IMAGE MAP OF THE 2007 HARRIS FIRE PERIMETER, POTRERO QUADRANGLE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

BY

Perry S. Clark, Wendy S. Scratch, Gaylord W. Bias, Gregory B. Stander, Jenne L. Sexton, and Bridgette J. Krawczak

2007

THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PRODUCT TO SUPPORT AGENCIES RESPONDING TO CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES

THIS PRODUCT IS RELEASED ON CONDITION THAT NEITHER THE USGS NOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ITS AUTHORIZED OR UNAUTHORIZED USE

CALIFORNIA

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

UTM GRID AND 2007 MAGNETIC NORTH

! !

! ! ! ! !

Ù

MN

221 MILS

12°18 ́ GN

4 MILS

0°14 ́

×

Harris Fire perimeter data were acquired as the best available data

These data may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). Projection and

1 000-meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid, zone 11S

10 000-foot grid ticks: California Coordinate System of 1983 (zone 6)

Road centerlines, road classification, route numbers, and street names © Tele Atlas 2007

Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only

and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government

Fire Perimeter Data.....................................................GeoMAC, October 28, 2007

Imagery ................. Digital Orthophoto Quadrangle ........................ USGS, 2005

Transportation ................................................................................ Tele Atlas, 2007

Names ........................................ Geographic Names Information System, 2006
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.366 Notification and correction campaign responsibilities. ( a ) Both IPIAs and DAPIAs are responsible for assisting the Secretary or an SAA in identifying the class of manufactured homes that may have been affected where the Secretary or an SAA makes or is contemplating making a preliminary determination of imminent safety hazard, serious defect, defect, or noncompliance under § 3282.412 with respect to manufactured homes for which the IPIA and DAPIA provided either plant inspection or design approval services.
( b ) The IPIA must in each manufacturing plant review at least monthly the manufacturer's service and inspection records to verify if appropriate determinations are being made by the manufacturer under § 3282.404 and, if not, take the actions required by this section and § 3282.404.
( c ) The IPIA in each manufacturing plant is also responsible for reviewing manufacturer determinations of the class of manufactured homes affected when the manufacturer is acting under subpart I. The IPIA must concur in the method used to determine the class of potentially affected manufactured homes or is to state why it finds the method to be inappropriate, inadequate, or incorrect.
[78 FR 60200, Oct. 1, 2013]
### §593b. Construction of additional works for irrigation purposes

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to construct, operate, and maintain under the provisions of the Federal reclamation laws (Act June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, and Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto), such additional works as he may deem necessary for irrigation purposes. Such irrigation works may be undertaken only after a report and findings thereon have been made by the Secretary of the Interior as provided in such Federal reclamation laws; and, within the limits of the water users' repayment ability, such report may be predicated on allocation to irrigation of an appropriate portion of the cost of constructing said dam and reservoir. Said dam and reservoir and said irrigation works may be utilized for irrigation purposes only pursuant to the provisions of said Federal reclamation laws.

(June 5, 1944, ch. 234, §3, 58 Stat. 271.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authorization of Appropriations

Act June 5, 1944, ch. 234, §4, 58 Stat. 271, authorized appropriation of such sums as might be necessary to carry out the purpose of this section and section 593a of this title.