alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §905. Homestead entries on forfeited lands

All persons who, on September 29, 1890, were actual settlers in good faith on any of the lands forfeited by section 904 of this title and were otherwise qualified, on making due claim on said lands under the homestead law within six months after the date of the promulgation by the Commissioner of the General Land Office of the instructions to the officers of the local land offices, for their direction in the disposition of said lands, shall be entitled to a preference right to enter the same under the provisions of the homestead law and sections 904 to 907 of this title, and shall be regarded as such actual settlers from the date of actual settlement or occupation; and any person who prior to September 29, 1890, has not had the benefit of the homestead or preemption law, or who has failed from any cause to perfect the title to a tract of land theretofore entered by him under either of said laws, may make a second homestead entry under the provisions of sections 904 to 907 of this title. The Secretary of the Interior shall make such rules as will secure to such actual settlers these rights: Provided, That nothing herein shall extend any time or enlarge any rights given by sections 904 to 907 of this title to any railroad company.

(Sept. 29, 1890, ch. 1040, §2, 26 Stat. 496; Feb. 18, 1891, ch. 244, 26 Stat. 764.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

Office of Commissioner of General Land Office abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of the Interior, or that officer as he may designate, by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                          [BANK OF NEW YORK LETTERHEAD]

                                BANK OF NEW YORK

                              Officer's Certificate

                          -----------------------------
                                February 21, 2006



MERRILL LYNCH DEPOSITOR, INC.
North Tower, 7th Floor
4 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10080

               PREFERREDPLUS, PPLUS TRUST AND INDEXPLUS CERTIFICATE

The undersigned, Thomas J. Bogert, the Vice President-Manager of The Bank of New
York, a New York corporation (the "Trustee"), hereby certifies in such capacity
that, based on his knowledge, the Trustee has complied, in all material
respects, with all conditions and covenants applicable to the Trustee under the
Standard Terms for Trust Agreements dated February 20, 1998 between Merrill
Lynch Depositor, Inc. as depositor (the "Depositor") and the Trustee, as
successor to United States Trust Company of New York, as trustee and securities
intermediary (the "Securities Intermediary"), in each case as amended by a
series supplement between the Depositor, the Trustee and the Securities
Intermediary for each series of trust certificates listed in the attached
schedule.




                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BANK OF NEW YORK


                                    By: /s/ Thomas J. Bogert
                                        ------------------------
                                    Name:  Thomas J. Bogert
                                    Title: Vice President


<PAGE>

                                    SCHEDULE

Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 HLT-1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1998 TRV-C1 Trust
Public STEERS(R) Series 1999 REN-C1 Trust
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CCR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ATT-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series NAI-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FRD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CZN-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series CTR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series LMG-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series QWS-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ALL-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series BLC-2
PreferredPLUS Trust Series ELP-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series MSD-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series VER-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series UPC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series FAR-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GEC-1
PreferredPLUS Trust Series GRC-1
PPLUS Trust Series PMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series VAL-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-1
PPLUS Trust Series FMC-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSG-2
PPLUS Trust Series DCC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CSF-1
PPLUS Trust Series SPR-1
PPLUS Trust Series TWC-1
PPLUS Trust Series CMT-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-1
PPLUS Trust Series DCNA-1
PPLUS Trust Series GSC-2
PPLUS Trust Series JPM-1
PPLUS Trust Series LMG-3
INDEXPLUS Trust 2003-1


                                       2
Case 3:09-cv-01971-EMC Document 46 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-01971-EMC Document 46 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 2
### §1339. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–185, §8(b), Aug. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 1717

Section, act Aug. 7, 1953, ch. 345, §10, 67 Stat. 469, related to requirements for refund of excess payments.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 104–185, §8(b), Aug. 13, 1996, 110 Stat. 1717, provided in part that the repeal of this section is effective Aug. 13, 1996.

#### Applicability of Repeal

Repeal of section not applicable to any privately owned minerals or with respect to Indian lands, see sections 9 and 10 of Pub. L. 104–185, set out as an Applicability of 1996 Amendment note under section 1701 of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining.
### §646. Grant extended to New Mexico and Arizona

All the provisions of sections 641, 642 and 643 1 of this title are extended to the States of New Mexico and Arizona, and the said States upon complying with the provisions of said sections shall be entitled to have and receive all of the benefits therein conferred upon the States.

(Feb. 18, 1909, ch. 150, §1, 35 Stat. 638.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 643 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Act Feb. 18, 1909, ch. 150, §2, 35 Stat. 639, provided: "That this Act [enacting this section] shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage."

1 See References in Text note below.
### §9. Repealed. June 17, 1948, ch. 496, §2(b), 62 Stat. 476

Section, R.S. §451; act June 19, 1878, ch. 329, 20 Stat. 183, provided for an assistant to sign land patents. See section 15 of this title.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




In
      connection with the amendment
      to the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC, Inc. (the "Company") for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig A. Zabala, as President
      of
      the Company, hereto certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:May
              8, 2006/s/ Craig
              A.
              ZabalaCraig A. Zabala
              President
              (Principal Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORBCOMM
GLOBEL, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          45,945
<SECURITIES>                                    48,309<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,117
<PP&E>                                         190,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,718)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,452
<BONDS>                                        172,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,358<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   320,825
<SALES>                                            133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   135
<CGS>                                              124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   193<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F4>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,394)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Represents only the current marketable securities.
<F2>Represents total partners' capital.
<F3>Include both interest income and equity in losses of affiliates.
<F4>$6,023 interest expense was capitalized.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 232.902 Eligible project.

Existing projects (with such repairs and improvements as are determined by the Commissioner to be necessary) are eligible for insurance under this subpart. The project must not require substantial rehabilitation and three years must have elapsed from the date of completion of construction or substantial rehabilitation of the project, or from the beginning of occupancy, whichever is later, to the date of application for insurance. In addition, the project must have attained sustaining occupancy (occupancy that produces income sufficient to pay operating expenses, annual debt service and reserve fund for replacement requirements) as determined by the Commissioner, before endorsement of the project for insurance; alternatively, the borrower must provide an operating deficit fund at the time of endorsement for insurance, in an amount, and under an agreement, approved by the Commissioner.

[59 FR 61228, Nov. 29, 1994]
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

RASHEED, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE CITY OF SAN RAMON, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-2011 MEJ

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On July 1, 2011, the Defendants in the above-captioned matter filed a motion for summary

judgment, with a noticed hearing date of August 5, 2010. (Dkt. #44.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule

7, Plaintiffs’ opposition was due by July 15, 2010; however, Plaintiffs failed to file an opposition.

Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the August 5 hearing and ORDERS Plaintiffs to show

cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and comply with court

deadlines. Plaintiffs shall file a declaration by August 5, 2010, and the Court shall conduct a hearing

on August 12, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-02011-MEJ Document 53 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 242.81 Lead-based paint poisoning prevention.

Requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 35 apply to this program.
### §414. Appropriation for projects essential

Expenditures shall not be made for carrying out the purposes of the reclamation law except out of appropriations made annually by Congress therefor, and there shall annually, in the Budget, be submitted to Congress estimates of the amount of money necessary to be expended for carrying out any or all of the purposes authorized by the reclamation law, including the extension and completion of existing projects and units thereof and the construction of new projects. The annual appropriations made hereunder by Congress for such purposes shall be paid out of the reclamation fund provided for by the reclamation law.

(Aug. 13, 1914, ch. 247, §16, 38 Stat. 690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The reclamation law, referred to in text, is defined in section 472 of this title.

#### Codification

Words "there shall annually, in the Budget, be submitted to Congress" substituted for "the Secretary of the Interior shall annually in the regular Book of Estimates, submit to Congress" in view of the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921, act June 10, 1921, ch. 18, 42 Stat. 20. See sections 1104 and 1105 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
Abatement Order filed October 25, 2012. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00832-CV

____________

NABILCO INC. AND D. HOUSTON, INC. D/B/A TREASURES, Appellants

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-28683

A B A T E M E N T O R D E R

On October 19, 2012, appellants filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing a 

notice of removal of this case to federal court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d). Accordingly, the 

appeal is ABATED until any party files a verified copy of an order remanding the case to 

state court. The appeal is treated as a closed case and removed from this court’s active 

docket.

PER CURIAM
§ 510.1 Service of process. ( a ) The General Counsel of the Broadcasting Board of Governors or any of his/her designees shall act as agent for the receipt of legal process against the Broadcasting Board of Governors, as well as against employees of the Board to the extent that the process relates to the official functions of the employees.
( b ) When accepting service of process for an employee in his/her official capacity, the General Counsel or his/her designee shall endorse on the server's return of process form, registered mail receipt, certified mail receipt, or express mail receipt: “Service accepted in official capacity only.”
( c ) Process shall be delivered to:
Mailing address: Office of the General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Cohen Building, Washington, DC 20237. Location: Office of the General Counsel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Cohen Building, Room 3349, Washington, DC 20237.
[53 FR 50515, Dec. 16, 1988, as amended at 74 FR 7562, Feb. 18, 2009]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HENRY R. HU and STEPHANIE F. HU, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LANEY LEE, JASON WANG, STEWARD 

WANG, ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY 

HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING MARK, I95 MALL OF ASIA INC., A.T.E.C. 

HOLDING INC., AMERICAN PRODUCTS 

EXHIBITION & EXCHANGE CENTER 

(U.S.A.), INC., ETRADE GUARANTEE 

ASSURANCE CORP., EASY EXPRESS 

SERVICES CORP., KATHY WANG, RUNAN 

ZHANG, ANDY TING, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09-2588 SC 

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT RUNAN 

ZHANG'S NOTICE OF MOTION 

AND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME, 

MOTION TO DISMISS, MOTION 

TO STRIKE

 The Court has received Defendant Runan Zhang's ex parte 

motion, entitled Notice of Motion and Motion to Extend Time, Motion 

to Dismiss, Motion to Strike ("Zhang Motion"). Defendant Runan 

Zhang is ordered to resubmit the Zhang Motion in compliance with 

General Order No. 45, regarding Electronic Case Filing, no later 

than Wednesday, February 10, 2010. 

 Plaintiff Henry R. Hu and Stephanie F. Hu ("Plaintiffs") must 

submit a partial response to the Zhang Motion no later than 

Tuesday, February 16, 2010. This response need only address the 

question of whether this Court should grant Defendant Runan Zhang's 

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 40 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

request to retroactively extend the deadline for responding to 

Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint; it need not address the 

merits of the Zhang Motion with regard to the motions to dismiss 

and strike. Alternatively, Plaintiffs may file a statement of nonopposition to the Zhang Motion. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 8, 2009 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 40 Filed 02/08/10 Page 2 of 2
Florida Air Transport Inc. 

5820 Miami Lakes Drive East 

Miami Lakes, Florida 33014 

Telephone: 305-863-3108 Fax: 305-871-1622 

Email: floridaairtransport@earthlink.net 

May 23,2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

Ref: FAA Docket Number: FAA-2016-3412 

Mr. Thomas J Leahy, 

Florida Air Transport would like to withdraw its original request for exemption as filed under 

FAA-2016-3412 and replace it with the revised letter dated May 23,2016 based on similar prior 

approval (Exemption No. 7255 dated June 28, 200). 

Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me any time. 

Sincerely, 

~/~a c:rtos Gome:o/ 

Vice- President 

Director of Maintenance 

Cell: 305-218-0619
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,084
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,432,341
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    294,154,909
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             307,224,715
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                 5,114,394
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,783
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 284,999,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             307,224,715
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             17,061,147
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               172,478
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,233,625
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       17,233,625
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,862
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,130,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,124,413
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  16,124,413
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,124,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                44,525.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    517,970
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                39,999     
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 (11,226)
<RECOVERIES>                                       698
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,333
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANCE JOHNSON, JOSEPHINE

ANADOLA JOHNSON, AND 

ARTHUR LEE,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, SHERIFF

WARREN RUPF, in his individual and official

capacities, CITY OF ANTIOCH, ANTIOCH

POLICE CHIEF JAMES HYDE, in his

individual and official capacities, and DOES 1

through 100, 

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01241 WHA

ORDER DENYING STIPULATED

REQUEST TO EXTEND EXPERT

DISCOVERY DEADLINES

The parties have resubmitted their stipulated request to extend expert discovery deadlines

by one week. While the parties have complied with Civil Local Rule 6-2 by filing a declaration

explaining the reasons underlying the request, the proffered justification — ongoing settlement

negotiations — is never an acceptable basis to enlarge time. These deadlines have been in place

for months and the parties must prepare for their dispositive motions and trial. As such, the

parties’ stipulated request is again DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 25, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01241-WHA Document 32 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 1