alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fact Sheet

SOCIAL SECURITY 

SSA Press Office 440 Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235 410-965-8904 

FAX 410-966-9973 

Social Security Is Important to Asian Americans and Pacific 

Islanders 

Social Security is neutral with respect to race or ethnicity – individuals with identical 

earnings histories are treated the same in terms of benefits. This Fact Sheet is provided by 

the Social Security Administration to highlight how Asian Americans benefit from the 

Social Security program and how certain demographic characteristics of Asian Americans 

compare with the entire population. 

• Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders benefit from the guaranteed benefit that is 

annually adjusted for inflation. With longer life expectancies, elderly Asian Americans 

and Pacific Islanders will live more years in retirement and benefit from Social Security’s 

cost-of-living protections. 

o Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders tend to have higher life expectancies at age 

65 than the majority of the population. 

 Asian American and Pacific Islander men who are age 65 in 2005 can 

expect to live to age 84, compared to age 81 for all men. 

 Asian American and Pacific Islander women who are age 65 in 2005 can 

expect to live to age 88, compared to age 85 for all women. 

• In 2007, the average annual Social Security income received by Asian American and 

Pacific Islander men 65 years and older was $13,386 and for women it was $10,650. 

• In 2007, among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders receiving Social Security, 27 

percent of elderly married couples and 53 percent of elderly unmarried persons relied on 

Social Security for 90 percent or more of their income. 

• The Asian American and Pacific Islander population in the U.S. is expected to grow. 

Today, about four and a half percent of the population is Asian American and Pacific 

Islander. This proportion is expected to grow to more than eight percent by 2050. 

Our website at www.socialsecurity.gov/aapi contains more information of interest to Asian 

Americans and Pacific Islanders. 

This fact sheet is designed to provide general information and may not apply to all individuals 

within each segment of the Asian American and Pacific Islander populations.
Exhibit 99.1


    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
                ------------------------------------------------

     I, Ronald N. Zebeck, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Metris
Companies Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Metris Companies Inc.


                                          /s/ Ronald N. Zebeck
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Ronald N. Zebeck
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
                                          November 14, 2002
# I AD Grid Sheet
Docket 

## No.: FAA-2011-0475 Directorate Identifier: 

## 201 0-NM-199-AD AD Action: 

## Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking This action applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200 , -200PF , -200CB , and -300 series airplanes. If this draft is acceptable , please legibly sign 

## the grid to the right with your first initial and full last name 

## to show concurrence with this AD . ONCURRENC ES ROUT ING SY MB OL



# A N .."" - ' S I

GN A TURE (F ir st Ini t ial/ L as t Na m e)

### {,,~



## If/- ROU TI NG S YM BOL S I

GNATU RE (F irs t Initi al / Last Na m e) DATE R

OU TIN G SYMB OL S I

GNATU RE (First Init ia l / La st Na m e) DATE ROU TI NG SYMBOL S I

GNATURE (F irst Initi al / La st Na m e ) DATE ROUT ING SYMBOL S I

GNATUR E (F irs t I ni t ial / La s t Nam e) DATE

# I


# AD Grid Sheet l)ockct No.: FAA-2011-0475 Directorate Identifier: 2010 -NM-199-AD AD Action: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking This action applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. 

## CONCURRENCES ROUTJNG SYMBOL 

### ANM-130S

ROUTING SYMBOL 

### ANM-130S

ANM-108B 

## If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial

**~..G~~~___,,__**__ _ 

## and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

## AEG

ROUTING SYMBOt 

### ANM-lOOS SIGNATURE (First In itia l /Last Name ) 

# f.

SIGNATURE (Firs t Initi al /Last Name) DATE ROUTING SYMBOt IGNATURE (Firs t Initial/Last Name) DATE ROUTING SYMBOL SIGNATUR E (Fi rst Initial/Last N;omc) DATE

# AD Grid Sheet
DocketNo.: 

### FAA-2011-0475 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2010-NM-199-AD AD Action: 

### Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking T his action applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. CONCURRENCES ROUTING SYMBOL 

### ANM-1308

ROUTING SYMBOL 

### ANM-1308

ANM-108B 

### If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign 

### the grid to the right with your first initial

**b6'~~---,---­** 

### and full last name 

### to show concurrence with this AD.

DATE S" 

# I\"'' 1-u:..:. 11{ OUTING SYMBOL 

### ANM-1008 SIGNATURE (first Init ia l/Last Name)

ATE OUTING SYMBOL IGNATURE ( First Initial/Last Name) DATE ROUTING SY!I.1BOL SIGNATURE (First Initial / Last Name)

ATE ROUTING SY!I.!BOL SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) DATE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin J. Wright, Jr., Appellant.

Judgment of resentenee unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Cattaraugus County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The application by the defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty should not have been passed upon by the County Judge but should have been referred by him to another Judge *(People*v. *Burgett,*15 A D 2d 873). While the County Judge was not the District Attorney of the county at the time of the defendant’s original conviction in 1934 he was the District Attorney at the time of an application in the nature of *coram nobis*in 1853. The order denying the application was affirmed by this court in 1954 *(People*v. *Wright,*284 App. Div. 1030). It is argued, in effect, by the present District Attorney that the County Judge took into account the facts with which he had become familiar in the course of the *coram nobis*proceeding in passing upon the present application for leave to withdraw the plea of guilty. While the County Judge’s connection with the defendant’s case in his capacity as District Attorney may not come within the letter of section 14 of the Judiciary Law, it comes within its spirit and the County Judge should have disqualified himself upon the present application (cf. *People*v. *Morgan,*277 App. Div. 956). The defendant and his attorney both indicated that they waived any objection to the County Judge’s sitting in the proceeding but a disqualification of the kind here involved may not be waived. (Appeal from judgment of resentence of Cattaraugus County Court which sentenced defendant to Elmira Reformatory until discharged by law, *nunc pro tunc*as of October 22, 1934.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
§ 35.1115 Evaluation. ( a ) A lead-based paint inspection shall be conducted in all public housing unless a lead-based paint inspection that meets the conditions of § 35.165(a) has already been completed. If a lead-based paint inspection was conducted by a lead-based paint inspector who was not certified, the PHA shall review the quality of the inspection, in accordance with quality control procedures established by HUD, to determine whether the lead-based paint inspection has been properly performed and the results are reliable. Lead-based paint inspections of all housing to which this subpart applies shall be completed no later than September 15, 2000. Revisions or augmentations of prior inspections found to be of insufficient quality shall be completed no later than September 17, 2001.
( b ) If a lead-based paint inspection has found the presence of lead-based paint, or if no lead-based paint inspection has been conducted, the PHA shall conduct a risk assessment according to the following schedule, unless a risk assessment that meets the conditions of § 35.165(b) has already been completed: ( 1 ) Risk assessments shall be completed on or before March 15, 2001, in a multifamily residential property constructed before 1960.
( 2 ) Risk assessments shall be completed on or before March 15, 2002, in a multifamily residential property constructed after 1959 and before 1978.
( c ) A PHA that advertises a construction contract (including architecture/engineering contracts) for bid or award or plans to start force account work shall not execute such contract until a lead-based paint inspection and, if required, a risk assessment, has taken place and any necessary abatement is included in the modernization budget, except for contracts solely for emergency work in accordance with § 35.115(a)(9).
( d ) The five-year funding request plan for CIAP and CGP shall be amended to include the schedule and funding for lead-based paint activities.
#### § 300.11 Authority of officers.

The President, each Vice President, and each Assistant Vice President of the Association are severally expressly empowered in the name of the Association to sign all contracts and other documents, instruments, and writings which call for execution by the Association in the conduct of its business and affairs, and to encumber, mortgage, pledge, convey or otherwise alien any property which the Association may own or in which it may have an estate, right, title or interest. In addition, the President, each Vice President, each Assistant Vice President, the Secretary of the Association, each Assistant Secretary, the Treasurer and the Controller shall have the authority as may be provided in the Bylaws of the Association or as may be delegated to them in a manner not inconsistent with the Bylaws.
§ 107.35 Complaints. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary for FH&EO, or designee, shall conduct such compliance reviews, investigations, inquiries, and informal meetings as may be necessary to effect compliance with this part.
( b ) Complaints under this part may be filed by any person and must be filed within one year of date of the alleged act of discrimination unless the time for filing is extended by the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO. Complaints must be signed by the complainant and may be filed with the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410, or any Regional or Area Office of the Department. All complaints shall be forwarded to the Director, Office of Regional Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity in the appropriate Regional Office which has jurisdiction in the area in which the property is located.
( c ) Upon receipt of a timely complaint, the Director of the Office of Regional FH&EO shall determine whether the complaint indicates a possible violation of the Executive Order or this part. The Director of the Office of Regional FH&EO or a designee within a reasonable period of time shall conduct an investigation into the facts. The complainant shall be notified of the determination.
### §90. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1946, ch. 529, 60 Stat. 352, which required authorization of Commissioner of the General Land Office for expenses chargeable to the Government incurred by registers, was omitted pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, set out as a note under section 1 of this title, which abolished the offices of registers and Commissioner of the General Land Office. Section was not repeated in the Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1948, act July 25, 1947, ch. 337, 61 Stat. 460. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

July 3, 1945, ch. 262, 59 Stat. 323.

June 28, 1944, ch. 298, 58 Stat. 468.

July 12, 1943, ch. 219, 57 Stat. 455.

July 2, 1942, ch. 473, 56 Stat. 511.

June 28, 1941, ch. 259, 55 Stat. 310.

June 18, 1940, ch. 395, 54 Stat. 412.

May 10, 1939, ch. 119, 53 Stat. 692.

May 9, 1938, ch. 187, 52 Stat. 297.

Aug. 9, 1937, ch. 570, 50 Stat. 569.

June 22, 1936, ch. 691, 49 Stat. 1762.

May 9, 1935, ch. 101, 49 Stat. 180.

Mar. 2, 1934, ch. 38, 48 Stat. 366.

Feb. 17, 1933, ch. 98, 47 Stat. 823.

Apr. 22, 1932, ch. 125, 47 Stat. 93.

Feb. 14, 1931, ch. 187, 46 Stat. 1117.

May 14, 1930, ch. 273, 46 Stat. 283.

Mar. 4, 1929, ch. 705, 45 Stat. 1565.

Mar. 7, 1938, ch. 137, 45 Stat. 203.

Jan. 12, 1927, ch. 27, 44 Stat. 938.

May 10, 1926, ch. 277, 44 Stat. 457.

June 5, 1924, ch. 264, 43 Stat. 395.

Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1179.

May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 557.

June 12, 1917, ch. 27, 40 Stat. 142.

Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 75, 38 Stat. 855.
§ 3.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 3.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 3.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 3.300 through 3.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 3.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
Case 3:09-cv-02011-MEJ Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02011-MEJ Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02011-MEJ Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-02011-MEJ Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 4 of 5
August 19, 2010 September 23 10:00 May 6, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02011-MEJ Document 43 Filed 05/06/10 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit
10.4

    


    Until
October 1, 2010, EnviraTrends subleased office space from an ImagiTrend, Inc.,
an affiliate of which Mr. Haraburda is the sole officer and director, for $1,447
per month.  The sublease expired December 31, 2009 at which time the
Company was able to continue on a month to month basis The Company has continued
to pay month to month.  The Company has recorded rent expense of
$10,450, $7,344, and $17,794 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, for the
period June 22, 2009 (date of inception) to September 30, 2009, and the
cumulative period from June 22, 2009 (date of inception) to March 31,
2010.  Commencing October 1, 2010, the Company will pay rent of $2,226
per month directly to the landlord.
-1- CASE NO. CV 09-2176 SI 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Laurence F. Padway, #89314 

LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109 

Alameda, California 94501 

Telephone: (510)814-0680 

Facsimile : (510)814-0650 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 

rebecca.hull@sdma.com 

One Market Plaza 

Steuart Tower, 8th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 781-7900 

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Kaiser Permanente Welfare Benefit Plan, incorrectly sued as 

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan; 

and Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life 

Insurance Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for defendant 

and real party to respond to plaintiff's letter brief re discovery, and to modify the briefing 

schedule on the dispositive motions in light of that letter brief as follows: 

Defendants’ Response to Pltf’s Discovery Letter Brief June 23, 2010 

Pamela Lee, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term 

Disability Plan, 

Defendant.

 CASE NO. CV 09-2176 SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 

 Real Party in Interest. 

and related counterclaim

Case 3:09-cv-02176-JW Document 42 Filed 06/07/10 Page 1 of 2
 -2- CASE NO. CV 09-2176 SI 

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff’s opening brief re Motion for Judgment due: August 6, 2010 

Defendants’ opposition and cross motion for judgment due: August 20, 2010 

Plaintiff’s reply and opposition to cross motion due: September 3, 2010 

Defendants’ reply due: September 10, 2010 

 Hearing on cross motions: September 17, 2010 

 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED. 

DATED: June 4, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF LAURENCE F. PADWAY 

By: /s/ Laurence F. Padway (as authorized 6/4/10)

Laurence F. Padway 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Pamela Lee 

DATED: June 4, 2010 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP 

By: /s/ Rebecca A. Hull

 Rebecca A. Hull 

 Attorneys for Defendant Kaiser Permanente 

 Welfare Benefit Plan, incorrectly sued as Kaiser 

 Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability 

 Plan; and Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life 

 Insurance Company 

ORDER

It is so ordered. The briefing schedule set forth in the parties’ stipulation is adopted, and 

the hearing on the cross dispositive motions shall be held September 17, 2010. 

Dated: ______________________ __________________________ 

 Hon. Susan Illston 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

Case 3:09-cv-02176-JW Document 42 Filed 06/07/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Lopez, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 421]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered on or about August 4, 2006, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.
### §2606. Oregon and California Railroad revested lands and Coos Bay Wagon Road reconveyed lands

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, with respect to the Oregon and California Railroad grant land revested in the United States by the Act of June 9, 1916 (39 Stat. 218, chapter 137), and the Coos Bay Wagon Road grant land reconveyed to the United States by the first section of the Act of February 26, 1919 (40 Stat. 1179, chapter 47), that is managed under the Act of August 28, 1937 (43 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.), the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, shall not be required to engage in consultation under any law (including section 7 of Public Law 93–205 (16 U.S.C. 1536) and section 402.16 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation)), with respect to—

(1) the listing of a species as threatened or endangered, or a designation of critical habitat, pursuant to Public Law 93–205 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), if a land use plan has been adopted by the Secretary of the Interior as of the date of listing or designation; and

(2) any provision of a land use plan adopted as described in paragraph (1).

#### (b) Effect of section

Nothing in this section affects any applicable requirement of the Secretary of the Interior to consult with the head of any other Federal department or agency—

(1) regarding a project carried out, or proposed to be carried out, pursuant to Public Law 93–205 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including any requirement to consult regarding the consideration of the cumulative impacts of completed, ongoing, and planned projects; or

(2) with respect to the development of a new land use plan or the revision of or other significant change to an existing land use plan.

(Pub. L. 115–141, div. O, title II, §209, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1067.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Acts of June 9, 1916, and February 26, 1919, referred to in subsec. (a), are acts June 9, 1916, ch. 137, 39 Stat. 218, and Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 47, 40 Stat. 1179, respectively, which are not classified to the Code.

The Act of August 28, 1937, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 876, 50 Stat. 874, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

Public Law 93–205, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1) and (b)(1), is Pub. L. 93–205, Dec. 28, 1973, 87 Stat. 884, known as the Endangered Species Act of 1973, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1531 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1531 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Wildfire Suppression Funding and Forest Management Activities Act, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, and not as part of the Act of August 28, 1937, which comprises this subchapter.
#### (A) In the Matter of the Arbitration between Joe Fried, Inc. and J. M. Rose *&*Co., Inc. (B) Norbert Roesler et al., as Trustees v. H. Christian Sonne. (C) South Ridge Corporation v. Amsinck Sonne Corporation et al. (D) Ivan Levczuk v. Babcock *&*Wilcox Company et al. (E) Thomas B. Galati, an Infant, v. Roman Catholic Church of Our Lady Queen of Angels et al.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ. [In each action.] Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
### §1304. Army and Navy registers

In addition to the usual number of the registers of the Army and Navy, fifteen hundred copies of each shall be printed: five hundred for the Senate, and one thousand for the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, §82 Stat. 1266.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §245 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 616).