alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNIFRAX
CORPORATION  AND  SUBSIDIARIES   CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS  OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND THEIR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        781
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 13,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  1,139
<INVENTORY>                                                   9,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              26,406
<PP&E>                                                        72,368
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (36,681)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                89,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         12,566
<BONDS>                                                       115,400
<COMMON>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (42,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  89,154
<SALES>                                                       64,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              64,524
<CGS>                                                         32,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 32,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            9,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               5,402
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  1,537
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           3,865
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               65
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  3,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
        

</TABLE>
§ 291.5 Definitions. Terms used in this part are defined as follows: *Competitive sale of individual property* means a sale of an individual property to an individual bidder through a sealed bid process (or other bid process specifically authorized by the Secretary) in competition with other bidders in which properties have been publicly advertised to all prospective purchasers for bids.
*Direct sale* means a sale to a selected purchaser to the exclusion of all others without resorting to advertising for bids. Such a sale is available only to approved applicants.
*Eligible properties* means HUD-acquired properties designated by HUD for property disposition or other housing programs.
*HUD* means the Department of Housing and Urban Development or its contractor, as appropriate.
*Insured mortgage* means a mortgage insured under the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*).
*Investor purchaser* means a purchaser who does not intend to use the property as his or her principal residence.
*Owner-occupant purchaser* means a purchaser who intends to use the property as his or her principal residence; a State, governmental entity, tribe, or agency thereof; or a private nonprofit organization as defined in this section. Governmental entities include those with general governmental powers (e.g., a city or county), as well as those with limited or special powers (e.g., public housing agencies).
*Private nonprofit organization* means a secular or religious organization, no part of the net earnings of which may inure to the benefit of any member, founder, contributor, or individual. The organization must: ( 1 ) Have a voluntary board;
( 2 ) ( i ) Have a functioning accounting system that is operated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; or
( ii ) Designate an entity that will maintain a functioning accounting system for the organization in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
( 3 ) Practice nondiscrimination in the provision of assistance in accordance with the authorities described in § 291.435(a); and
( 4 ) Have nonprofit status as demonstrated by approval under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)), or demonstrate that an application for such status is currently pending approval.
*Secretary* is defined in 24 CFR 5.100.
*State* means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
*Tribe* has the meaning provided for the term “Indian tribe” in section 102 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5302).
[64 FR 6479, Feb. 9, 1999, as amended at 81 FR 53002, Aug. 11, 2016]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6377

JAMES AVERY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONNIE MOATS, Warden, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-3569) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Avery, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on November 5, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on November 6, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.d. 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:James Avery seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Avery’s notice of appeal was not timely filed.Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 6, 1998. * Avery’s notice of appeal was filed on March 9, 1999. Because Avery failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and3 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3021 

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 

program through September 30, 2005, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families 

block grant program through September 30, 2005, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF Extension Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR 

7 NEEDY FAMILIES BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 

8 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2005. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of 

10 title IV of the Social Security Act, and by section 1108(b) 
2 

•HR 3021 IH 

1 of such Act, shall continue through September 30, 2005, 

2 in the manner authorized for fiscal year 2004, and out 

3 of any money in the Treasury of the United States not 

4 otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated 

5 such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants 

6 and payments may be made pursuant to this authority 

7 through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level 

8 provided for such activities through the fourth quarter of 

9 fiscal year 2004. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

11 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘September 30’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE 

15 STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WEL16 FARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH SEP17 TEMBER 30, 2005. 

18 Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) 

19 of the Social Security Act shall continue through Sep20 tember 30, 2005, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 

21 2004, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United 

22 States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appro23 priated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. 

24 Grants and payments may be made pursuant to this au25 thority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 at 
3 

•HR 3021 IH 

1 the level provided for such activities through the fourth 

2 quarter of fiscal year 2004. 

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2851

To extend the suspension of duty on 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-

piperidinyl)–2,5-pyrrolidinedione. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the suspension of duty on 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6-

tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)–2,5-pyrrolidinedione.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 3-DODECYL-1-(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-

4 PIPERIDINYL)–2,5-PYRROLIDINEDIONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.12 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)–2,5-

8 pyrrolidinedione) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 
2

•HR 2851 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

SF:663429v1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference 

 Case Nos. C09-0764 EMC & C09-3681 EMC 

Steven R. Blackburn, State Bar No. 154797 

Andrew J. Sommer, State Bar No. 192844 

EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

One California Street, 26th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-5427 

Telephone: 415.398.3500 

Facsimile: 415.398.0955 

sblackburn@ebglaw.com 

asommer@ebglaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants, 

MSR CLAREMONT RESORT LP AND PYRAMID 

ACQUISITION II MANAGEMENT LP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JEAN RIKER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

KSL CLAREMONT RESORT, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

ANNA ALLEN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MSR CLAREMONT RESORT LP, et al., 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. C09-0764 EMC 

CASE NO. C09-3681 EMC 

(Related case) 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

Hearing Date: June 23, 2010 

Hearing Time: 2:30 p.m. 

Courtroom: C, 15th Floor 

(Hon. Edward M. Chen) 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, JEAN RIKER and ANNA 

ALLEN (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants, MSR CLAREMONT RESORT LP and PYRAMID 

ACQUISITION II MANAGEMENT LP (“Defendants”), through their respective attorneys of 

record herein, as follows: 

1. Currently, the case management conference in these access cases is set for June 

23, 2010. 

Case 3:09-cv-00764-EMC Document 39 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

SF:663429v1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference 

 Case Nos. C09-0764 EMC & C09-3681 EMC 

2. The parties participated in court mediation on June 9, 2010. The parties have 

made considerable progress in resolving injunctive relief and anticipate scheduling a follow-up 

mediation session in September 2010. Pursuant to General Order 56, the parties respectfully 

request that the case management conference be continued to October 2010, after the completion 

of mediation. 

DATED: June 16, 2010 EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C. 

By: /s/ Andrew J. Sommer Steven R. Blackburn 

Andrew J. Sommer 

Attorneys for Defendant 

MSR CLAREMONT RESORT LP 

DATED: June 16, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 

By: /s/ Celia McGuiness Paul L. Rein 

Celia McGuinness 

Catherine Caballo 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

JEAN RIKER AND ANNA ALLEN 

DATED: June 16, 2010 MOSLEY & GEARINGER LLP 

By: /s/ Brian Gearinger Brian Gearinger 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ANNA ALLEN 

ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the case management conference in this case is 

continued from June 23, 2010 to October __, 2010. 

Dated: 

Honorable Edward M. Chen 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-00764-EMC Document 39 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 2
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Daves of America, Inc. for the
quarter ended April 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Famous Daves of America, Inc.
 Dated:  May 11, 2007
    By:
    /s/ David GoronkinDavid GoronkinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  May 11, 2007
    
    /s/ Diana Garvis PurcelDiana Garvis PurcelChief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) ORBCOMM
GLOBAL, L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) 10 Q
FILING
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      968
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,830
<PP&E>                                         363,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 363,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,123
<BONDS>                                        170,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   363,245
<SALES>                                          1,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,064
<CGS>                                            1,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,980<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,983<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (68,046)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (68,046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (68,046)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes 23,757 as depreciation expenses, 19 as goodwill amortization and 509
as equity in net losses of affiliates.
<F2>Net of interest income of 185.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., etal.,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))))

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ     C08-4118 BZ     C09-2016 BZ

BRIEFING ORDER

If Compass Vision has any objection to Maximus’s motion

to temporarily lift the stay as to plaintiffs Cleveland,

Daniels, Howe and Moore for purposes of summary judgment, IT

IS ORDERED to file those objections by July 9, 2010.  If a

reply or a hearing is necessary, the Court will issue a

further order. 

Dated: July 1, 2010

     Bernard Zimmerman

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\BRIEFING ORD RE MAXIMUS MOT TO LIFT

STAY.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ   Document 81   Filed 07/01/10   Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Betty Ann Keipper, Also Known as Betty K. Keipper, Deceased. Bonnie K. Farrell, Appellant; Judy Ann Roderick, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 855]

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, S.), entered December 14, 2005 in a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and

*1194the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision by the Surrogate. Present—Scudder, EJ., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
#### § 320.7 Mortgages.

Each issue of guaranteed securities must be backed by a separate pool of mortgages which meet the requirements of the applicable MBS Guide.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A2103. WILLIAM MILLER v. THE STATE.

William Miller pleaded guilty to aggravated battery and was sentenced to ten

years to serve four on October 17, 2019. After the imposition of his sentence, Miller

filed four motions to withdraw his guilty plea, and on November 15, 2019, the trial

court entered separate orders denying each of Miller’s motions. On March 2, 2020,

Miller filed a notice of appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the trial court order

sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v.

State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Miller’s notice of appeal, filed

137 days from the imposition of his sentence and 108 days from the trial court’s

denial of his motions to withdraw his guilty plea, is untimely. Accordingly, this

appeal must be DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 04, 2020

09/04/2020
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of SouFun Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lanying Guan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 26, 2012



/s/ Lanying GuanName:

Lanying GuanTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00329-CV

Style: Fariha Ashfaq

v Mohammad Ashfaq

Date motion filed*: June 24, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record

Party filing motion: Court Reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’s Record

If motion to extend time:

Deadline to file document:

Number of previous extensions granted:

Length of extension sought:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend 

time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

The reporter’s record was filed on July 2, 2014. Accordingly, the court reporter’s motion for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record is dismissed as moot.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ______________________________.

Date: July 3, 2014