alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDISK CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 LSI CORPORATION,

Defendant. /

LSI CORPORATION AND AGERE

SYSTEMS, INC.,

Counterclaimants,

 v.

SANDISK CORPORATION,

Counterdefendant. /

No. C 09-02737 WHA

ORDER RESCHEDULING 

RULE 706 CONFERENCE 

TO MARCH 3

Due to the unavailability of Rule 706 expert candidate Dr. Julius Smith on March 4, 2010,

the Rule 706 conference is rescheduled to 1:30 P.M. ON MARCH 3, 2010. The parties have

indicated that both Dr. Smith and Dr. Chang Y. Choo are available at that time. Moreover, the

presence of the candidates at the technology tutorial may be helpful to the discussion thereafter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02737-WHA Document 97 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.14
 (AHCCCS LOGO)
    
    ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIONDIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE
SECTION A: CONTRACT
 1. AMENDMENT
    
    2. CONTRACT
    
    3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
    
    4. PROGRAMNUMBER:
    
    NO.:
    
    AMENDMENT:5
    
    YH09-0001-04
    
    August 1, 2009
    
    DHCM  ACUTE
  Health Choice Arizona
410 N. 44 th Street, Suite 900
Phoenix, AZ 85008
   ADDto Section B, CAPITATION RATES after first subparagraph add the following language
    NOTE:Please sign and date all copies and return one executed original to:
    
    Mark HeldSr. Procurement SpecialistAHCCCS Contracts701 E. Jefferson St., MD 5700Phoenix, AZ 85034
 8. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT
NOT HERETOFORE CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL EFFECT.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO SIGN THEIR NAMES IN AGREEMENT
 9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED
    
    10. SIGNATURE OF AHCCCSA CONTRACTINGREPRESENTATIVE:
    
    OFFICER:/s/ Carolyn Rose
    

/s/ Michael VeitTYPED NAME: CAROLYN ROSE
    
    MICHAEL VEITTITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    CONTRACTS & PURCHASING ADMINISTRATORDATE:7/8/2009
    
    DATE:




---



##### 



ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
REVISED CAPITATION RATE SUMMARY  ACUTE RATES
Health Choice Arizona
10/1/08-12/31/08
 TANF
    
    
    TANF
    
    
    TANF
    
    
    SSI
    
    
    SSITitle XIX and KidsCare Rates:
    
    <1, M/F
    
    
    1-13, M/F
    
    
    14-44, F
    
    

w/ Med
    
    

w/o Med
    
    
    Non-MED4 Apache/Coconino/Mohave/Navajo
    
    $
    548.07
    
    
    $
    120.39
    
    
    $
    305.79
    
    
    $
    194.72
    
    
    $
    829.54
    
    
    $
    621.6410 Prima/Santa Cruz
    
    $
    451.00
    
    
    $
    103.70
    
    
    $
    239.79
    
    
    $
    146.21
    
    
    $
    723.04
    
    
    $
    492.11
 
 Health Choice Arizona
    

PaymentBenson Hospital
    
    $
    Carondelet Holy Cross
    
    $
    270,760.88Cobre Valley Community Hospital
    
    $
    Copper Queen Community Hospital
    
    $
    7,317.94La Paz Regional Hospital
    
    $
    60,575.13Little Colorado Medical Center
    
    $
    350,785.77Mount Graham Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    Navapache Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    1,298,323.31Northern Cochise Community Hospital
    
    $
    Page Hospital
    
    $
    130,195.80Payson Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    Sage Memorial Hospital
    
    $
    158,128.18Sierra Vista Regional Health
    
    $
    Southeastern Az Medical Center
    
    $
    Valley View Medical Center
    
    $
    645,706.65Verde Valley Medical Center
    
    $
    White Mountain Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    63,693.11Wickenburg Regional Health Center
    
    $
    YRMC East
    
    $
    Total
    
    $
    2,985,486.77
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court 

For the Northern District of California 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

HENRY R. HU and STEPHANIE F. HU, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LANEY LEE, JASON WANG, STEWARD 

WANG, ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY 

HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING MARK, I95 MALL OF ASIA INC., A.T.E.C. 

HOLDING INC., AMERICAN PRODUCTS 

EXHIBITION & EXCHANGE CENTER 

(U.S.A.), INC., ETRADE GUARANTEE 

ASSURANCE CORP., EASY EXPRESS 

SERVICES CORP., KATHY WANG, RUNAN 

ZHANG, ANDY TING, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 09-2588 SC 

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS 

ANITA BEI HUANG, JERRY 

HUANG, EDWARD WONG, KING 

MARK, KATHY WANG, ANDY TING

 On April 30, 2010, the Court held a case management conference 

during which Plaintiff agreed to voluntarily dismiss from this case 

Defendants who have not been served. Docket No. 54. On May 5, 

2010, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Dismissal. Docket No. 56. 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 57 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California 

 Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses from this case 

Defendants Anita Bei Huang, Jerry Huang, Edward Wong, King Mark, 

Kathy Wang, and Andy Ting. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 6, 2010 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02588-SC Document 57 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 2
### §501. Disposition of profits of project taken over by water users

Whenever the water users take over the care, operation, and maintenance of a project, or a division of a project, the total accumulated net profits, as determined by the Secretary, derived from the operation of project power plants, leasing of project grazing and farm lands, and the sale or use of town sites shall be credited to the construction charge of the project, or a division thereof, and thereafter the net profits from such sources may be used by the water users to be credited annually, first, on account of project construction charge, second, on account of project operation and maintenance charge, and third, as the water users may direct. No distribution to individual water users shall be made out of any such profits before all obligations to the Government shall have been fully paid.

(Dec. 5, 1924, ch. 4, §4, subsec. I, 43 Stat. 703.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 371 of this title apply to this section.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report of SYNUTRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I,
      Liang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.





Dated
                this 28thday
                of September, 2006.
            By:
            /s/
                Liang ZhangLiang
                Zhang
              Chief
                Executive Officer
#### JARRETT *v.*HUDSON

May 16, 1912.

It is no defense to a trover suit that the plaintiff acquired title from former owner of the chattel in fraud of the rights of the wife of such former owner, where the defendant is not a privy of the person alleged to have been defrauded.

Trover. Before Judge Walker. Warren superior court. April 3, 1911.

*L. D. McGregor,*for plaintiff in error. *B. P. Davis,*contra.

*203Evans, P. *J.*

The plaintiff, *W.*E. Hudson, brought an action of trover against E. *W.*Jarrett to recover certain personal property., The defendant offered to amend his plea by alleging: “That the consideration of the note, bill of sale, or mortgage, which the said Eobt. Harrison executed to the said *W.*E. Hudson on the-day of--, 1908, was fraudulent and illegal and made for the purpose of hindering, delaying, and defrauding the wife of said Eobt. Harrison in collecting her judgment against the said Harrison for alimony. That the said Hudson by his own consent and agreement entered into the said fraudulent and illegal contract with the said Harrison, and that the said note, bill of sale, or mortgage, which is the basis of this trover proceeding, is the culmination of such fraudulent and illegal agreement and contract. That by reason of such fraud the title to said property never passed into the said Hudson; and for that reason defendant says that the said Hudson has no title or right to recover the property sued for.” The amendment was disallowed, and the ease proceeded to trial, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff.

.There was no error in rejecting the amendment. The defendant does not allege himself to be a privy in 'estate with Mrs. Harrison. It'is of no concern to him whether Mrs. Harrison’s husband executed the bill of sale to the plaintiff to defeat the judgment which she obtained against her husband. A conveyance made in fraud of the rights of creditors is not absolutely void, but is voidable at the instance of creditors affected by it. *Moore*v. *Mobley,*123 *Ga.*424 (51 S. E. 351). In a proceeding by Mrs. Harrison to subject the property to the payment of her judgment, if Hudson relied on title from her husband, she could attack the bill of sale as fraudulent. In this case, however, the transaction set up in the stricken amendment is res inter alios acta.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Theophilus Ward, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Motion for change of venue denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard V. Secord, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc. ("CTI");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under the Company's
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2006

/s/ Richard V. Secord
-------------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
### §7383i. Definitions of national laboratory and nuclear weapons production facility

For purposes of this subchapter:

(1) The term "national laboratory" means any of the following:

(A) The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California.

(B) The Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

(C) The Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico and Livermore, California.

(2) The term "nuclear weapons production facility" means any of the following:

(A) The Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri.

(B) The Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas.

(C) The Y–12 Plant, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

(D) The tritium operations at the Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.

(E) The Nevada Test Site, Nevada.

(Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3155, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 942.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle D of title XXXI of div. C of Pub. L. 106–65, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 931, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of subtitle D to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7383 of this title and Tables.
Case 3:09-cv-01562-MEJ Document 19 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01562-MEJ Document 19 Filed 04/12/10 Page 2 of 3
12

Case 3:09-cv-01562-MEJ Document 19 Filed 04/12/10 Page 3 of 3
§ 3286.102 Information provided by manufacturer. ( a ) *Shipment of home to retailer or distributor.* At the time the manufactured home is shipped to a retailer or distributor, the manufacturer must provide notice to the retailer or distributor that tracking information for the home is being provided to HUD, and the information must be updated by the retailer or distributor in accordance with the requirements in § 3286.113. Such notice must include all of the information required in § 3286.9(a). The manufacturer is also encouraged to provide notice to the retailer that reminds the retailer of its other responsibilities under this part.
( b ) *Manufacturer's installation instructions.* The manufacturer is required to include in its installation instructions for the home a notice that the home is required to be installed in accordance with: ( 1 ) An installation design and instructions that have been provided by the manufacturer and approved by the Secretary directly or through review by the DAPIA; or
( 2 ) An installation design and instructions that have been prepared and certified by a professional engineer or registered architect, that have been approved by the manufacturer and the DAPIA as providing a level of protection for residents of the home that equals or exceeds the protection provided by the federal installation standards in part 3285 of this chapter.
§ 245.419 Initial submission of materials to HUD: Major capital additions. In the case of major capital additions, the mortgagor must submit the following materials to the local HUD office: ( a ) The general plans and sketches of the proposed capital additions;
( b ) A statement describing the estimated effect of the proposed capital additions on the value of the project, the project income and expenses (including property taxes), and the project rent schedule;
( c ) A statement describing how the proposed capital additions will be financed and the effect, if any, of that financing on the tenants;
( d ) A statement assessing the compatibility of the proposed capital additions with the residential character of the project; and
( e ) A copy of the notice to tenants.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0310)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>0001022657
<NAME>AETNA

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                             284
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                       356
<INVENTORY>                                     32,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,075
<PP&E>                                          72,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 202,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,611
<BONDS>                                         86,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,240)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   202,744
<SALES>                                        193,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,964
<CGS>                                          173,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,014)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,656)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,358)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





(a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert Dilworth________


Robert Dilworth




Chief Executive Officer




November 12, 2010










Exhibit 32.1


(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ William Swain________


William Swain




Chief Financial Officer




November 12, 2010
Exhibit No. 10.15
  John
W. Loofbourrow Associates, Inc. Member FINRA, MSRB, SIPC
 
 CONFIDENTIAL
 
 June 30,
2008
 
 Dr. Craig
A. Zabala
 Chairman
of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer
 Blackhawk
Capital Group BDC, Inc.
 14 Wall
Street, Suite 1100B
 New York,
NY 10005
 
 Dear Dr.
Zabala,
 
 This
letter confirms that the Agreement previously executed between Blackhawk Capital
Group BDC, Inc. (“Blackhawk”) and John W. Loofbourrow Associates, Inc.
(“Loofbourrow”) dated April 9, 2008 expired on June 18, 2008
(“Agreement”).  This letter further confirms that Blackhawk agrees to
‘grandfather’ the placement fees stipulated in the Agreement due to any
investors introduced to the Blackhawk Regulation E Offering prior to the
expiration of the Agreement (the “Investors”).
 
 In return
for Loofbourrow’s services in the placement of the Securities to Investors, the
Company has agreed to pay Loofbourrow the Financing Fee of any Securities placed
by Loofbourrow as placement agent in connection with the Company's Regulation E
Offering (the "Offering") of $5 million in common stock ("Securities") to
qualified institutional buyers (“QIB”).
 
 In
connection with this Engagement, Loofbourrow solicited interest in the Offering
from a number of Investors, including Ludvik Capital Inc., a Delaware based
equity fund, Bridge Harbor Capital Management LLC, a New York-Based hedge fund
with Arthur T. Murphy, Jr. as President, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio
Manager. Ludvik Capital and Bridge Harbor qualify as QIB Investors and both have
decided to participate in the Offering by investing $250,000.
 
 Subsequent
to that investment decision by Bridge Harbor, Mr. Murphy decided to invest
$250,000 from his personal IRA at E-Trade. Mr. Murphy is a New York Resident and
acts as a Fiduciary of both his hedge fund and his personal IRA. However, he
does not meet the requirements of a QIB investor; he meets the Regulation D
requirements under the private placement rules.
  
 
 Since Mr.
Murphy would be investing as a Regulation D investor instead of a QIB under such
circumstances as described herein, this letter confirms that Loofbourrow may
collect placement fees for Mr. Murphy’s personal investment.
 
 Loofbourrow
will notify Blackhawk if any other Investor solicited by Loofbourrow decides to
participate in the Offering prior to Closing, and Blackhawk agrees that
Loofbourrow will be entitled to the Financing Fees of any Securities placed by
Loofbourrow with those Investors.
 
 Please
acknowledge your agreement with this letter by affixing your signature
below.
 
 Very
truly yours,
 
 /s/ John
W. Loofbourrow
 
 ________________________________________________
 John W.
Loofbourrow
 President
 Accepted
and agreed to as of June 30, 2008
 
 BLACKHAWK
CAPITAL GROUP BDC, INC.
 
 /s/
Craig. A. Zabala
 ________________________________________________
 Dr. Craig
A. Zabala
 Chairman
of the Board & President
 
 44 Wall
Street • 20th Floor • New York, NY 10005 • Phone 212 558-6400 • Fax 646-695-3110
• www.loofinc.com
#### § 96.28 [Reserved]