alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Alliance Income Trust Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
J. Wrensen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and I, Andrea
Barney, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully compiles with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: August 13, 2008
                                     /s/ Richard J. Wrensen
                                     ----------------------
                                     Richard J. Wrensen
                                     President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                     /s/ Andrea Barney
                                     -----------------
                                     Andrea Barney
                                     Principal Accounting Officer and Controller
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Ellerbe, Appellant.

Motion by defendant for leave to appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel, denied. It appears from the court records that the appeal is from an order, dated November 21, 1960, of the County Court, Kings County, denying defendant’s motion for a copy of the judgment roll *796(including the minutes) upon his conviction in said court on June 19, 1959, for the crime of murder in the second degree, on his plea of guilty. Such order is not appealable. Nor may defendant, in any event, obtain a review of the judgment of conviction, since it appears that he has failed to take a timely appeal therefrom. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §§70 to 73. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632, 638, 645, 646

Section 70, act Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208, consolidated offices of register and receiver.

Section 71, act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145, provided for consolidation of offices of register and receiver, effective July 1, 1925.

Section 72, R.S. §2334; acts Jan. 27, 1898, ch. 10, 30 Stat. 234; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to duties of Secretary of the Interior concerning sale of public lands.

Section 73, act Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §2, 42 Stat. 208, related to designation of chief clerk to act in case of death, resignation, removal, or disability of register.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to section 71 of this title were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1179.

June 30, 1922, ch. 255, §1, 42 Stat. 766.

May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 557.

Mar. 24, 1921, ch. 161, 41 Stat. 1397.

June 5, 1920, ch. 235, 41 Stat. 907.

July 19, 1919, ch. 24, 41 Stat. 194.

Act May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 557, abolished land office at Springfield and offices of register and receiver thereat.

Act May 2, 1914, ch. 74, §§1, 2, 38 Stat. 371, 372, abolished office of receiver of public moneys at Springfield, Mo., transferred his duties and custody of books, records, etc., to register, and contained other provisions concerning register's duties.

Act. Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §3, 28 Stat. 807, required duplication of reports and returns of registers and receivers to be prevented by regulations.

Act. Oct. 1, 1890, ch. 1269, §2, 26 Stat. 657, concerned taking of final proofs by remaining officer in case of a vacancy in office of register or receiver.
| Name of Subsidiary                   | State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization | Names under which such subsidiaries do business |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                         |                                            |
| Rand Finance Corp.                   | Delaware                                                     | Rand Finance Corp.                              |
| Rand LL Holdings Corp.               | Delaware                                                     | Rand LL Holdings Corp.                          |
| Lower Lakes Towing Ltd.              | Canada                                                       | Lower Lakes Towing Ltd.                         |
| Lower Lakes Transportation Company   | Delaware                                                     | Lower Lakes Transportation Company              |
| Grand River Navigation Company, Inc. | Delaware                                                     | Grand River Navigation Company, Inc.            |
### **CHAPTER 7—ADJUSTMENT BOARDS AND LABOR BOARDS**
### §451h. Establishment of farm units; size; contiguous or noncontiguous

In administering sections 434, 448, and 544 of this title, the Secretary may, to the extent found necessary as shown by a land classification to provide farm units sufficient in size to support a family, establish such units of not more than three hundred and twenty acres containing not more than one hundred and sixty irrigable acres designated by him and may permit entry and assignment under the homestead laws, and retention and assignment under the desert land laws, of such units. The lands included in farm units established pursuant to the authority of this section and entered under the homestead laws may be contiguous or noncontiguous.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §9, 67 Stat. 568.)
#### Gertrude B. Kaplan, Appellant, v Ira B. Kaplan,

In an action for divorce on the ground that the husband and wife have lived separate and apart for one year pursuant to a written agreement of separation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 10, 1977, which denied her motion to dismiss the defenses and counterclaims contained in the second, third and fourth paragraphs of the defendant’s answer. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The defendant seeks, by way of his answer, to reform or modify certain provisions of the separation agreement entered into by the parties. However, he makes no claim that he was in any way the victim of fraud, overreaching, duress or unconscionability. The separation agreement was acceptable to both parties when made, and its terms are not subject to attack on the grounds set forth by the defendant (cf. *Matthews v Schusheim,*42 AD2d 217, affd 35 NY2d 686). Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
§ 203.270 Open-end insurance charges. ( a ) *Required charge.* In the case of an insured open-end advance the mortgagee shall pay to the Commissioner an open-end insurance charge.
( b ) *Payment of charge for mortgages with periodic MIP.* The amount of any insured open-end advance shall be added to the average outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage for the purpose of determining the amount of periodic MIP as provided in §§ 203.260 through 203.268, except that the initial additional charge shall be prorated to cover the period beginning with the first day of the month following the issuance of a certificate evidencing the insurance of the open-end advance and ending on the due date of the next MIP.
( c ) *Payment of charge for mortgages with one-time or up-front MIP.* In the case of a mortgage with a one-time or up-front MIP pursuant to § 203.280, § 203.284, or § 203.285 of this part, the insurance charge shall be in an amount equal to 1 ⁄ 2 percent per annum of the outstanding principal obligation of the open-end advance. Sections 203.260 through 203.268 shall apply to the open-end charge on a mortgage with a one-time or up-front MIP, except that all references to amortization dates shall refer to amortization dates of the open-end advance, references to MIP shall refer to the open-end insurance charge, and references to outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage shall refer to outstanding principal obligation of the open-end advance.
( d ) *Method of payment—all mortgages.* The payment of any open-end insurance charge under this subpart shall be made to the Commissioner by the mortgagee either in cash or debentures issued by the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund at par plus accrued interest.
[48 FR 28806, June 23, 1983, as amended at 56 FR 24624, May 30, 1991; 57 FR 15211, Apr. 24, 1992; 57 FR 46983, Oct. 14, 1992; 58 FR 41003, July 30, 1993]
#### In the Matter of Anna Krimer, an Incompetent Person. Maria Bricker, as Committee for Anna Krimer, an Incompetent Person, Appellant; William D. Krimer, Respondent.

In a proceeding by the committee of an incompetent person pursuant to section 1377-b of the Civil Practice Act, to discover property claimed to have been withheld by respondent, the incompetent’s son, the petitioner (the committee, who is the incompetent’s daughter) appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 12,1961 which dismissed the proceeding on the merits, upon the decision of the court after a nonjury trial. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to grant a new trial with the following memorandum: On February 20, 1959 the incompetent’s husband (now deceased), who was the father of the respondent son, executed a will giving 90% of his $500,000 estate to his son and 10% to his daughter (presently acting as committee of the incompetent). The will was made under circumstances which, in my opinion, require a determination by a jury on the issue of the father’s testamentary capacity and on the issues of fraud and undue influence on the part of the son. The transactions with respect to the two bank accounts involved in this proceeding took place subsequent to the execu*666tion of the will. On March 4,1959, the son and his father Avent to the hank; the father withdrew $20,000 plus accrued interest from a joint account in the names of the father and his wife (the present incompetent) and deposited the amount withdrawn in a joint account in the names of the father and the son. These moneys were withdrawn by the son in June and July, 1959. On May 4, 1959; an account of over $5,000 in the name of the father in trust for the wife was withdrawn and deposited in a joint account in the names of the father and the son. This money was withdrawn by the son in October 1959. It also appears from the evidenee in the pending probate proceeding *(Matter of Krimer,*16 A D 2d 665) that on March 4, 1959 an account of almost $4,500 was changed from the name of the father to a joint account in the names of the father and the son; that on March 4, 1959 an account of over $26,000 in the name of the father was changed to a joint account in the names of the father and the son; and that in March and April, 1959 the entire proceeds were withdrawn by the son. Under the circumstances, taking into consideration the fact that the father was 83 years old at the time of these transactions and the fact that he had cerebral arteriosclerosis, brain cancer, blindness in the left eye, and glaucoma in the right eye, it is my opinion that a new trial is required in the interests of justice so that all the facts may be ascertained and so that a determination may be reached in this discovery proceeding which would be consistent with the determination ultimately made in the probate proceeding by a jury.
#### § 242.27 Maturity.

The mortgage shall have a maturity not to exceed 25 years from the date amortization begins.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2837 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2837

       To extend the duty suspension on sodium methylate powder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the duty suspension on sodium methylate powder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM METHYLATE POWDER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to sodium methylate powder) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §1844. Burden of proof

With respect to any claim for damages filed under this subchapter, there shall be a presumption that such damages were due to activities related to oil and gas exploration, development, or production if the claimant establishes that—

(1) the commercial fishing vessel was being used for fishing and was located in an area affected by Outer Continental Shelf activities;

(2) a report on the location of the material, equipment, tool, container, or other item which caused such damages and the nature of such damages was made within fifteen days after the date on which the vessel first returns to a port after discovering such damages;

(3) there was no record on the latest nautical charts or Notice to Mariners in effect at least 15 days prior to the date such damages were sustained that such material, equipment, tool, container, or other item existed where such damages occurred, except that in the case of damages caused by a pipeline, the presumption established by this section shall obtain whether or not there was any such record of the pipeline on the damage date; and

(4) there was no proper surface marker or lighted buoy which was attached or closely anchored to such material, equipment, tool, container, or other item.

(Pub. L. 95–372, title IV, §404, Sept. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 688; Pub. L. 97–212, §4, June 30, 1982, 96 Stat. 145.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–212, §4(1), substituted "under this subchapter" for "pursuant to this subchapter" and "damages were due to activities related to oil and gas exploration, development, or production" for "claim is valid" in provisions preceding par. (1).

Par. (2). Pub. L. 97–212, §4(2), substituted "fifteen days after the date on which the vessel first returns to a port after discovering such damages" for "five days after the date on which such damages were discovered".

Par. (3). Pub. L. 97–212, §4(3), inserted "the latest" after "no record on", struck out "the" before "Notice to Mariners", and substituted "in effect at least 15 days prior to the date" for "on the date" and "where such damages occurred, except that in the case of damages caused by a pipeline, the presumption established by this section shall obtain whether or not there was any such record of the pipeline on the damage date" for "in such area".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–212 applicable with respect to claims for damages filed on or after June 30, 1982, with the Secretary of Commerce under section 1845(a) of this title, with provision for the refiling of previously filed claims under certain circumstances, see section 9 of Pub. L. 97–212, set out as a note under section 1841 of this title.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Roebling Financial Corp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, we, Frank J. Travea, III,Chief Executive Officer, and Janice A. Summers, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of            the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

 

 

 

| /s/ Frank J. Travea, III              |   | /s/ Janice A. Summers                                                      |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Frank J. Travea, III                  |   | Janice A. Summers                                                          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                  |   |                                                                       |

 

| Date: | December 29, 2008 |
|-------|-------------------|
### §1209. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–7, div. I, title III, §345(5), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 418

Section, Pub. L. 97–468, title VI, §610, Jan. 14, 1983, 96 Stat. 2575, related to reversion from the State of railroad property to the United States.
§ 3280.301 Scope. This subpart covers the minimum requirements for materials, products, equipment, and workmanship needed to assure that the manufactured home will provide the following: ( a ) Structural strength and rigidity;
( b ) Protection against corrosion, decay, insects, rodents, and other similar destructive forces;
( c ) Protection against wind hazards;
( d ) Resistance to the elements; and
( e ) Durability and economy of maintenance.
[78 FR 73982, Dec. 9, 2013]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.56

                             [HARRAH'S LETTERHEAD]


                                 July 24, 2000


Mr. Frederick W. Burford
JCC Holding Company
One Canal Place
365 Canal Street
Suite 900
New Orleans, LA 70130

         Re: FORBEARANCE

Dear Fred:

     We are in receipt of your letter of July 18. We understand the difficulty
of your position and the financial problems facing JCC and the property. As a
result, we remain willing and interested in continuing to engage in discussions
with JCC and all of JCC's lenders and creditors with a view to arriving at a
permanent solution to JCC's financial problems.

     To that end, we plan to discuss with our Board of Directors, at a
regularly scheduled meeting this week, the subject of the New Orleans project.
We expect to be in a position after the Board meeting to respond to your
letter. Under these circumstances we (Harrah's Entertainment, Inc., Harrah's
Operating Company, Inc. and Harrah's New Orleans Management Company) agree to
extend the forbearance date under the Limited Forbearance Agreement from
August 1, 2000 to August 15, 2000.


                                             Very truly yours,

                                             /s/ CHARLES L. ATWOOD
                                             Charles L. Atwood

CA:sr


cc:  Steve Brammell
     Colin Reed
### §375d. Issuance of patent for small tracts; reservations

After the purchaser has paid to the United States all the amount on the purchase price of such land, a patent shall be issued. Such patents shall contain a reservation of a lien for water charges when deemed appropriate by the Secretary, and reservations of coal or other mineral rights to the same extent as patents issued under the homestead laws and also other reservations, limitations, or conditions as now provided by law.

(Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 78, §3, 64 Stat. 40.)
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0186 JACOB SMITH,

Plaint iff and Appellant, v. MICHAEL ROOPE,

Defendant and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Michael Donahoe,** whose name appears next on the list of pro bono attorneys desiring appo int me nta s mediators fo r Mo ney Judg ments app eals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to c onduct the mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time periods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the dat e of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s April 21, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of th e Supreme Court c: Jacob Smit h, Mi chael Roope, Mi chael Donahoe 04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0186
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned R. Greg Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of ERF Wireless, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: May 16, 2005

By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     ----------------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
     and Accounting Officer)


                                       24