alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.7





EXHIBIT 99.7











VERMILION
ENERGY INC.
CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



In connection with the annual report of Vermilion
Energy Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lorenzo Donadeo, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada this 7th
day of March 2014.







| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| | (“Lorenzo
    Donadeo”)                     
| | [Signature]                                 
| |                                             
| | Lorenzo
    Donadeo, Chief Executive Officer
| |                                             

















EXHIBIT 99.7



VERMILION
ENERGY INC.
CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



In connection with the annual report of Vermilion
Energy Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis Hicks, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada this 7th day
of March 2014.





| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | (“Curtis
    Hicks”)                     
| | [Signature]                              
| |                                          
| | Curtis
    Hicks, Chief Financial Officer
| |
EXHIBIT 32.2


          CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
        OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   I, Richard Blass,  Executive Vice  President and Chief  Financial  Officer of
Delta  Financial  Corporation  (the  "Company"),  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:

1. The  quarterly  report  on Form  10-Q of the  Company  for the  period  ended
   September 30, 2003 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
   of and for the period ended September 30, 2003.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  executed  this  Certification  this  13th  day of
November, 2003.


                                  By:/s/RICHARD BLASS
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     Richard Blass
                                     EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND
                                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER









                                       1
#### HAGAN v. EAST RIVER BRIDGE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Caroline A. Hagan against the East River Bridge Company.

No opinion. . Motion granted, with $10 costs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


Polypore, Inc.


Chief Executive Officer Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002






|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



| |     |                 
| | --- | ----------------
| | By: | /s/ Frank Nasisi

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| | Frank Nasisi                         
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
### §33. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section, act June 16, 1880, ch. 235, 21 Stat. 274, authorized Secretary of War to detail officers of Ordnance Corps to serve with Geological Survey.
§ 576.3 Allocation of funding. ( a ) *Territories.* HUD will set aside for allocation to the territories up to 0.2 percent, but not less than 0.1 percent, of the total amount of each appropriation under this part in any fiscal year. HUD will allocate this set-aside amount to each territory based on its proportionate share of the total population of all territories and its rate of compliance with the most recent expenditure deadline under § 576.203.
( b ) *States, metropolitan cities, and urban counties.* HUD will allocate the amounts that remain after the set-aside to territories under paragraph (a) of this section to States, metropolitan cities, and urban counties, as follows: ( 1 ) HUD will provide that the percentage of the total amount available for allocation to each State, metropolitan city, or urban county is equal to the percentage of the total amount available under section 106 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the prior fiscal year that was allocated to that State, metropolitan city, or urban county.
( 2 ) Except as otherwise provided by law, if the amount a metropolitan city or urban county would be allocated under paragraph (b)(1) is less than 0.05 percent of the total fiscal year appropriation for ESG, that amount will be added to the allocation for the State in which the city or county is located.
( c ) *Notification of allocation amount.* HUD will notify each State, metropolitan city, urban county, and territory that is eligible to receive an allocation under this section of the amount of its allocation.
#### § 35.905 Definitions and other general requirements.

Definitions and other general requirements that apply to this subpart are found in subpart B of this part.
#### § 3280.210 Fire testing.

All fire testing conducted in accordance with this subpart shall be performed by nationally recognized testing laboratories which have expertise in fire technology. In case of dispute, the Secretary shall determine if a particular agency is qualified to perform such fire tests.

[49 FR 32011, Aug. 9, 1984. Redesignated at 78 FR 73982, Dec. 9, 2013]
#### Joseph P. D’Angelo, v. Jeanette E. Greenberg, Doing Business as Atlantic Heating & Equipment Co., Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying motions of defendant to dismiss the complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### DUNNE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by Edward Dunne against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,986,463
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,134,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,523,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,919,178
<PP&E>                                         304,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,183,125
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,527,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,125
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,618,175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,183,125
<SALES>                                      2,751,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,609,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               249,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                750,632
<INCOME-TAX>                                   285,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            750,632
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   465,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1000.542 When may HUD require replacement of a recipient? ( a ) In accordance with section 402 of NAHASDA, as a condition of HUD making a grant on behalf of an Indian tribe, the Indian tribe shall agree that, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, HUD may, only in the circumstances discussed below, require that a replacement TDHE serve as the recipient for the Indian tribe.
( b ) HUD may require a replacement TDHE for an Indian tribe only upon a determination by HUD on the record after opportunity for hearing that the recipient for the Indian tribe has engaged in a pattern or practice of activities that constitute substantial or willful noncompliance with the requirements of NAHASDA.
### §597b. Compensation for easements

Compensation to the individual Indian owners of the allotted lands within the area described in section 597a of this title shall be made from moneys appropriated for the construction of the Bull Lake Dam and Reservoir at the appraised value of the easements: Provided, That should any individual Indian not agree to accept the appraised value of the easement as it affects his land, the Secretary of the Interior be, and he is, authorized to acquire such easement by condemnation proceedings.

(Mar. 14, 1940, ch. 51, §2, 54 Stat. 49.)
Exhibit 11





ALLIN CORPORATION





CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE





(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)





Three Months Ended September 30, 2001


Three Months Ended September 30, 2002

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
256


$
200

$
(11,883
)

$
162Loss from discontinued operations


85



11


665



15Net income (loss)


171



189


(12,548
)


147Accretion and dividends on preferred stock


167



173


491



509Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

$
4


$
16

$
(13,039
)

$
(362
)Earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders - basic and
diluted

$
0.01


$
0.00

$
(1.78
)

$
(0.05
)Loss per common share from discontinued operations - basic and diluted

$
(0.01
)

$
0.00

$
(0.09
)

$
0.00Net loss per common share attributable to common shareholders - basic and diluted

$
0.00


$
0.00

$
(1.87
)

$
(0.05
)Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted


6,967,339



6,967,339


6,966,036



6,967,339
§ 570.308 Joint requests. ( a ) *Joint requests and cooperation agreements.* ( 1 ) Any urban county and any metropolitan city located, in whole or in part, within that county may submit a joint request to HUD to approve the inclusion of the metropolitan city as a part of the urban county for purposes of planning and implementing a joint community development and housing program. Such a joint request shall only be considered if submitted at the time the county is seeking a three year qualification or requalification as an urban county. Such a joint request shall, upon approval by HUD, remain effective for the period for which the county is qualified as an urban county. An urban county may be joined by more than one metropolitan city, but a metropolitan city located in more than one urban county may only be included in one urban county for any program year. A joint request shall be deemed approved by HUD unless HUD notifies the city and the county of its disapproval and the reasons therefore within 30 days of receipt of the request by HUD.
( 2 ) Each metropolitan city and urban county submitting a joint request shall submit an executed cooperation agreement to undertake or to assist in the undertaking of essential community development and housing assistance activities, as defined in § 570.307(c).
( b ) *Joint grant amount.* The grant amount for a joint recipient shall be the sum of the amounts authorized for the individual entitlement grantees, as described in section 106 of the Act. The urban county shall be the grant recipient.
( c ) *Effect of inclusion.* Upon urban county qualification and HUD approval of the joint request and cooperation agreement, the metropolitan city shall be considered a part of the urban county for purposes of program planning and implementation for the period of the urban county qualification, and shall be treated the same as any other unit of general local government which is part of the urban county.
( d ) *Submission requirements.* In requesting a grant under this part, the urban county shall make a single submission which meets the submission requirements of 24 CFR part 91 and covers all members of the joint recipient.
[53 FR 34449, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 1915, Jan. 5, 1995]
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

#### § 17.9 Referral to Department of Justice.

When Department of Justice approval or consultation is required under § 17.8, the referral or request shall be transmitted to the Department of Justice by the General Counsel of the Department or his designee.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

February 26, 2015

Hon. D. Allan Erwin, Jr.

Roerig, Oliveira & Fisher

Attorneys at Law

855 West Price Road, Suite 9

Brownsville, TX 78520

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Roger W. Hughes

Adams & Graham

P. O. Drawer 1429

Harlingen, TX 78551-1429

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Moises R. Hernandez

Hernandez Law Firm

P. O. Box 2999

Harlingen, TX 78551

Re: Cause No. 13-12-00199-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 2006-CPC-92-B

Style: GRADY DOWELL v. GRACIE QUIROZ, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE 

ESTATE OF MARIO GONZALEZ LIRA, NOE LIRA; MARIA ANGELES LIRA; 

MARLINY GUTIERREZ, ANNETTE GUTIERREZ, NANCY GUTIERREZ, 

AND DAVID GUTIERREZ

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: County Court at Law No. 2

Hon. Sylvia G. Perez, Cameron County Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 233 (Thursday, December 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Fellowships: Infectious Diseases and Microbiology.
    Date: December 10, 2020.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Alexander D. Politis, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3210, MSC 7808, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1150, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#60100f0c0914091301200313124e0e09084e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fffe0e3e6fbe6fceecfecfcfda1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 30, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-26606 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Glenn Wendlin Reiger Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

2
§ 570.406 Formula miscalculation grants. ( a ) *General.* Grants under this section will be made to States and units of general local government determined by the Secretary to have received insufficient amounts under section 106 of the Act as a result of a miscalculation of its share of funds under such section.
( b ) *Application.* Since the grant is to correct a technical error in the formula amount which should have been awarded under section 106, no application is required.
( c ) *Use of funds.* The use of funds shall be subject to the requirements, certifications and Final Statement otherwise applicable to the grantee's section 106 grant funds provided for the fiscal year in which the grant under this section is made.
( d ) *Unavailability of funds.* If sufficient funds are not available to make the grant in the fiscal year in which the Secretary makes the determination required in paragraph (a) of this section, the grant will be made, subject to the availability of appropriations for this subpart, in the next fiscal year.
[56 FR 41940, Aug. 26, 1991]
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2997 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback claims. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

drawback claims. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 DRAWBACK CLAIMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protec8 tion shall, not later than 90 days after the date of the 

9 enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the draw10 back claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c). 
2 

•HR 2997 IH 

1 (b) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS DUE.—Any amounts due 

2 pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of the claims 

3 described in subsection (c) shall be paid not later than 

4 90 days after the date of such liquidation or reliquidation. 

5 (c) DRAWBACK CLAIMS.—The drawback claims re6 ferred to in subsection (a) are the following: 

Drawback claim number Filing 

date 

AA6–0303556–6 12/02/97 

AA6–0313128–2 10/10/02 

Æ
#### Winifred Kenney, Respondent, v. Peter F. Kenney, Jr., Appellant.

Motion by appellant husband for a stay pending appeal granted, on condition: (1) that, beginning December 12, 1960, he pay to the respondent wife, $70 per week on account of temporary alimony; and (2) that he perfect the appeal for the January Term, commencing January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before December 20, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.