alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 5. | The      term “Offering” shall also include the Company’s offering of up to      1,000,000 shares  ($5.00 per share) pursuant to Regulation E      (the “Regulation E Offering”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as      amended, and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.   The      Regulation E Offering has no minimum and a maximum of      $5,000,000. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 6. | The      term “Offering Materials” shall include the Company’s Form 1-Es and      Offering Circulars filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and      distributed to prospective investors, for the Regulation E      Offering. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 7. | Section      2 shall be amended to provide that the Placement Agent shall receive a      cash fee of ten percent (10%) of any shares of Common Stock purchased by      investors in the Regulation E Offering and placed by the Placement      Agent. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 8. | Reference      is made to Section 3 of the Agreement with respect to the      Term.  The Term of the Agreement with respect to the Regulation      E Offering shall terminate on the earliest to occur of (x) the termination      of the Regulation E Offering and (y) the date that the Placement Agent and      the Company mutually agree in writing to terminate the Placement Agent’s      participation in the Regulation EOffering. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEY SOURCE INTERNATIONAL INC.,

a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

APEX MARITIME SHIPPING COMPANY,

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02389 WHA

ORDER RE-OPENING CASE

Plaintiff filed a “notice of settlement of entire action” on February 22, 2010, noting only

that the “action has been settled in its entirety.” On that basis, the Court dismissed the action. 

Now, plaintiff files an application to vacate the dismissal in this action because the case is not

quite settled. The Court notes that prior to plaintiff’s “notice of settlement,” a motion to strike

had been set for MARCH 25, 2010, AT 8:00 A.M. 

The parties cannot have it both ways. Either a case is settled or it’s not. So, the dismissal

is VACATED. The motion is back on calendar, with plaintiff’s opposition being due March 4 and

defendant’s reply due March 11. 

Please note that all deadlines remain active until a dismissal is filed. Plaintiff’s request for

a “settlement status hearing 30–45 days out” is DENIED. PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR ANY

CONTINUANCES.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02389-WHA Document 65 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 180.710 Judicial review of final decision. ( a ) Any party adversely affected by a final decision may file a petition in the appropriate United States Court of Appeals for review of the decision under 42 U.S.C. 3612(i). The petition must be filed within 30 days after the date of issuance of the final decision.
( b ) If no petition for review is filed under paragraph (a) of this section within 45 days after the date of issuance of the final decision, the findings of facts and final decision shall be conclusive in connection with any petition for enforcement.
### §82. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–649, title II, §202(b), July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 507

Section, R.S. §2238; acts May 14, 1880, ch. 89, §2, 21 Stat. 141; Dec. 17, 1880, ch. 2, 21 Stat. 311; July 26, 1892, ch. 251, 27 Stat. 270; Mar. 22, 1904, ch. 748, 33 Stat. 144; May 29, 1908, ch. 220, §14, 35 Stat. 468; Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1179; June 5, 1924, ch. 264, 43 Stat. 395; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145, related to fees and commissions required to be collected by district land offices. See section 1734 of this title.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and, |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  /s/                John                P. Keefe                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John                P. Keefe, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial                Officer |   |
|                                                                                                |   |
|                  Date: May 15, 2008                                                                 |   |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20975

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN FITZGERALD WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-169-1

--------------------

March 26, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent John Fitzgerald Wilson has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wilson has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
### §6023. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–230, title II, §204, Apr. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 302

Section, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §123, as added Pub. L. 98–527, §2, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2674; amended Pub. L. 100–146, title II, §203, Oct. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 849, required habilitation plan as condition to State's receipt of allotment under this subchapter.
Exhibit 32.1





(a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert Dilworth


Robert Dilworth




Chief Executive Officer




August 13, 2010












(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ William Swain


William Swain




Chief Financial Officer




August 13, 2010
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA**

BILLY LEE HENDERSON, III ,

Appellant / Defendant,

- vs STATE OF MONTANA,

Appellee / Plaint iff. CASE NO. DA - 19 - 0396 

### ORDER GRANTING **EXTENSION** Upon Defendant / Appellant’s foregoing motion an d good cause appearing therefor ; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED; That Defendant / Appellant is granted an extension of time for the filing of Appellant's opening brief to August 27 , 2020 . DATED and Electronically Sig ned Below

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 14 2020

05/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0396
### §2622. Appraisal of land and timber; manner and frequency; computation of amounts upon basis of last appraisement; deduction of appraisement expenses

Appraisals of the land and timber thereon shall be made, in the manner prescribed in section 2621 of this title, not less frequently than once in each ten-year period, and the amounts due hereunder in any year shall be computed as specified in section 2621 of this title upon the basis of the last appraisement. The expenses of making the appraisements provided for in this subchapter shall be paid by the Secretary of the Treasury upon certification by the Secretary of the Interior, from that portion of the receipts derived from such lands and timber payable to the counties and shall be deducted from any amount due said counties.

(May 24, 1939, ch. 144, §2, 53 Stat. 754.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1181f–2 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.352 State exclusive IPIA functions. ( a ) Any State which has an approved State Administrative Agency may, if accepted as an IPIA, act as the exclusive IPIA within the State. A State which acts as an IPIA but is not approved as an SAA may not act as the exclusive IPIA in the State. A State which acts as an exclusive IPIA shall be staffed to provide IPIA services to all manufacturers within the state and may not charge unreasonable fees for those services.
( b ) States which wish to act as exclusive IPIAs shall apply for approval to do so in their State plan applications. They shall specify the fees they will charge for IPIA services and shall submit proposed fee revisions to the Secretary prior to instituting any change in fees. If at any time the Secretary finds that those fees are not commensurate with the fees generally being charged for similar services, the Secretary will withhold or revoke approval to act as an exclusive IPIA. States acting as DAPIAs and also as exclusive IPIAs shall establish separate fees for the two functions and shall specify what additional services (such as approval of design changes and full time inspections) these fees cover. As provided in § 3282.302(b)(11), each State shall submit fee schedules for its activities and, where appropriate, the fees presently charged for DAPIA and IPIA services, and any fees charged for DAPIA and IPIA services during the preceding two calendar years.
( c ) A State's status as an exclusive IPIA shall commence upon approval of the State Plan Application and acceptance of the State's submission under § 3282.355. Where a private organization accepted or provisionally accepted as an IPIA under this subpart H is operating in a manufacturing plant within the State on the date the State's status as an exclusive IPIA commences, the private organization may provide IPIA services in that plant for 90 days after that date.
[61 FR 10861, Mar. 15, 1996]
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA PIPETRADES HEALTH AND WELFAREPLAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CHARLOTTE RODRIGUES,

Defendant.

NO. C09-1431 TEH

ORDER REQUIRINGSUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFINGON MOTION FOR DEFAULTJUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, which

is scheduled to be heard on April 5, 2010.  The Court has reviewed the moving papers; no

opposition has been received.  On or before March 29, 2010, Plaintiffs shall supplement

their moving papers with the following:

1.  Counsel’s billing records, which were listed as Exhibit A to the Declaration of

Sonya M. Gordon but never filed; and 

2.  An explanation of how the claimed interest was calculated.

The April 5 hearing date shall remain as scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:   03/22/10                                                                         THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:09-cv-01431-TEH   Document 17   Filed 03/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T19:33:56-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 26, 2016

NO. 03

- 16

- 00125

- CV

Carolyn Barnes, Appellant

v.

Alan Schreiber, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 419TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES G OODWIN AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order sig ned by the district court on February 8, 2016. Having

reviewed the record, it appears to the Court that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal by

failing to file a brief and did not comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court. Therefore,

the Court dismisses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and unable

to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3030 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3030

        To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of N-[[(4,6-
      dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsul onyl)-2-
             pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2005

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of N-[[(4,6-
      dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsul onyl)-2-
             pyridinesulfonamide and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF N-[[(4,6-DIMETHOXYPYRIMIDIN-2-
              YL)AMINO]CARBONYL]-3-(ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-
              PYRIDINESULFONAMIDE AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.33.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking the article description and inserting the 
        following: ``Mixtures of N-[[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-
        yl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinesulfonamide and 
        application adjuvants (CAS No. 122931-48-0) (provided for in 
        subheading 3808.30.15)''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2003'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,364,035
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         171,817
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,968,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       9,645,781
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,007,576
<LOANS>                                     95,321,486
<ALLOWANCE>                                    115,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,585,151
<DEPOSITS>                                  79,356,016
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            799,393
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,000,000
<COMMON>                                        20,476
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,409,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             113,585,151
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,205,819
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              818,365
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               145,634
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,169,818
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,922,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,987,180
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,182,638
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    9,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,484,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,015,135
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,015,135
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,209,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.89
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   722,329
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               106,360
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              115,360
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           115,360
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF GREAT WOLF RESORTS, INC.
 1.
    
    BHMH, LLC2.
    
    Blue Harbor Resort Sheboygan, LLC3.
    
    CTGW, LLC4.
    
    Desert Desserts, LLC5.
    
    GLGB Manager III, LLC6.
    
    Great Bear Lodge of Wisconsin Dells, LLC7.
    
    Great Lakes Services, LLC8.
    
    Great Wolf Capital Trust I9.
    
    Great Wolf Connecticut, LLC10.
    
    Great Wolf Kansas SPE, LLC11.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Chehalis, LLC12.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Georgia, LLC13.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Grapevine, LLC14.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Kansas City, LLC15.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of PKI, LLC16.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of the Carolinas, LLC17.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC18.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Traverse City, LLC19.
    
    Great Wolf Lodge of Williamsburg, LLC20.
    
    Great Wolf Traverse SPE, LLC21.
    
    Great Wolf Williamsburg SPE, LLC22.
    
    GW Capital Trust II23.
    
    GW Capital Trust III24.
    
    GWF Connecticut, LLC25.
    
    GWL Development PKI, LLC26.
    
    GWL KC Beverage, Inc.27.
    
    GWR Development Connecticut, LLC28.
    
    GWR Michigan, LLC29.
    
    GWR OP General Partner, LLC30.
    
    GWR Operating Partnership, LLLP31.
    
    Knot PF, LLC32.
    
    Mason Family Resorts, LLC33.
    
    Niagara Glenview Tent & Trailer Park Company (Nova Scotia)34.
    
    Pine Brook Properties, LLC35.
    
    Poco Topo Gigio, LLC36.
    
    Williamsburg Landlord Parcel C, LLC37.
    
    Williamsburg Landlord Parcel D38.
    
    Williamsburg Meadows
§ 214.107 Approval by HUD. ( a ) *Notice of approval.* If an application package meets all requirements outlined in § 214.103, HUD will approve an agency for a period of up to 3 years. HUD will advise the agency of its approval in the form of an approval letter to the agency's main office.
( b ) *Certificate of Approval.* HUD will issue a “Certificate of Approval” to the approved agency. The certificate will show the period of approval.
( c ) *Appearance on list of HUD-approved and participating housing counseling agencies.* For purposes of client referrals, participating agencies that provide housing counseling services directly to clients must provide HUD with the agency name and contact information, which may appear on HUD's Web site. In addition, names and addresses of all participating agencies that provide housing counseling services directly may be made available to the public through HUD's toll-free housing counseling hotline.