alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Federal Defendants are specially appearing for the purposes of filing this stipulation. 1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CV-09-2890 TEH

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

MELISSA K. BROWN (CSBN 203307)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6962

FAX: (415) 436-6748

melissa.k.brown@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LUDWIK CHROBOK,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-09-2890 TEH

E-FILED

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR

FEDERAL DEFENDANT TO FILE A

RESPONSIVE PLEADING

The plaintiff Ludwik Chrobok, (“Plaintiff”) and the federal defendants United States of

America and Veterans Administration (“Federal Defendants”) by and through their counsel

1

stipulate to the following:

WHEREAS, the Federal Defendant has requested additional time to file a responsive

pleading due to a trial conflict, and the need to assess the possible addition of other parties in this

action;

ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree and stipulate as follows:

 The parties agree that the Federal Defendant shall have until March 10, 2010 to file a

responsive pleading in this action.

Case 3:09-cv-02890-TEH Document 15 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CV-09-2890 TEH

So Stipulated.

DATED: January 27, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

/s/ Melissa Brown

________________________________

MELISSA K. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: January 27, 2010

MARK J. ALEXANDER

Law Offices of Mark J. Alexander

/s/ Mark J. Alexander

________________________________

MARK J. ALEXANDER

Attorney for the Plaintiff

Case 3:09-cv-02890-TEH Document 15 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CV-09-2890 TEH

[PROPOSED ] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Federal Defendant shall have until March 10,

2010 to file and serve a responsive pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: _______________ ____________________________

HON. THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Court Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

01/27/10

Case 3:09-cv-02890-TEH Document 15 Filed 01/28/10 Page 3 of 3
### §390xx. Validation of contracts entered into prior to October 1, 1981

The provisions of any contract entered into prior to October 1, 1981, by the Secretary with a district, which define project or nonproject water, or describe the delivery of project water through nonproject facilities or nonproject water through project facilities to lands within the district, are hereby authorized and validated on the part of the United States.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §225, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1273.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3233 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3233

            To extend the suspension of duty on trifluralin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the suspension of duty on trifluralin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIFLURALIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to a,a,a-Trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-
p-toluidine) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/
31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Morris M. Gollin, appellee, v. Matteson & Conran, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,069.

Claim for return by landlord of a deposit on contract for renting rooms, said contract having been rescinded by landlord. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. J. R. Prichard, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

Phillip D. Hoffman, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 578.45 Rehabilitation. ( a ) *Use.* Grant funds may be used to pay up to 100 percent of the cost of rehabilitation of structures to provide housing or supportive services to homeless persons.
( b ) *Eligible costs.* Eligible rehabilitation costs include installing cost-effective energy measures, and bringing an existing structure to State and local government health and safety standards.
( c ) *Ineligible costs.* Grant funds may not be used for rehabilitation of leased property.
( d ) *Broadband infrastructure.* Any substantial rehabilitation, as defined by 24 CFR 5.100, of a building with more than 4 rental units and funded by a grant awarded after January 19, 2017 must include installation of broadband infrastructure, as this term is also defined in 24 CFR 5.100, except where the grantee determines and, in accordance with § 578.103, documents the determination that: ( 1 ) The location of the substantial rehabilitation makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible;
( 2 ) The cost of installing broadband infrastructure would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its program or activity or in an undue financial burden; or
( 3 ) The structure of the housing to be substantially rehabilitated makes installation of broadband infrastructure infeasible.
[77 FR 45442, July 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 92637, Dec. 20, 2016]
#### John J. Reynolds, Inc., Respondent, v. Judith Snow et al., as Administratrices of the Estate of Lillian R. Schwamm, Deceased, and as Administratrices of the Estate of Harvey L. Schwamm, Deceased, Appellants.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and on the facts so as to dismiss the complaint -and otherwise affirmed, with costs to the appellants. The plaintiff in the performance of its duties as a real estate broker was required to exercise the utmost good faith and loyalty and not to act in any manner inconsistent with its agency or trust *(Lamdin*v. *Broadway Surface Ado. Corp., 272*N. Y. 133; *Wendt*v. *Fischer,*243 N. Y. 439). A failure to disclose any interest tending to influence the plaintiff in its conduct in obtaining and negotiating a lease *654constitutes a breach of-its fiduciary obligation and precludes it from recovering for services rendered *(Murray*v. *Beard,*102 N. Y. 505). We conclude that the plaintiff has by its conduct forfeited its rights to the commission sought to be recovered. The letter from the plaintiff to Harold Bickford leaves no doubt that the plaintiff, through its president, had a “ long and intimate friendship ” with the principals of the Bickford chain. In addition to such relationship it is manifestly clear from the letter that the giving of the lease to Bickford was considered desirable by the plaintiff and to its benefit so that it could in turn obtain an additional commission through Bickford’s subletting through it of a portion of the premises. The nature of the personal relationship and the anticipation of the subletting commissions, of necessity were factors as would tend to influence the plaintiff in its conduct as a fiduciary and should have been fully disclosed *(Murray*v. *Beard, supra).*Failing of such disclosure the plaintiff has failed to act with the requisite *uberrima fides*and has forfeited its right to commissions. While the plaintiff’s letter seems to indicate that it had an offer better than that which it submitted to its principal and which was ultimately accepted, it is not essential that such offer shall have in fact been made. It is sufficient that the letter itself shows that the plaintiff had an interest not wholly consistent with that of its principal. However, while we bar a recovery by the plaintiff we agree that the defendants may not recover on their counterclaim. To warrant such a recovery it must be proven that another offer was in fact made and rejected by plaintiff and that such offer, considering all its terms, was superior to that of Bickford. The proof as to these facts is insufficient. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
### §965. Restriction on use of Colorado and Wyoming pipeline right of way

Nothing in sections 962 to 965 of this title shall authorize the use of such right of way except for the pipe line, and then only so far as may be necessary for its construction, maintenance, and care.

(May 21, 1896, ch. 212, §4, 29 Stat. 127.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
(January 23, 1961)

#### United States Trucking Corporation et al., Respondents, v. John J. O’Rourke, as President of Teamster Joint Council No. 16, et al., Appellants.

Order, entered on January 19,1961, granting a preliminary injunction and holding the motion for a temporary injunction *sub judice,*unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, without costs. Plaintiffs have not shown the clear right to relief required on an application of this nature, inasmuch as, passing all other questions, there is at least serious doubt that the actions complained of are not arguably within the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board. (Cf. *Dooley*v. Anton, 8 N T 2d 91, 96.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Rahin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MARTHA ARANA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4775

)

PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 23, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge.

Melissa A. Giasi and Erin M. Berger of 

Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Michael A. Rosenberg of Cole, Scott & 

Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK and SMITH, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., SENIOR ASSOCIATE JUDGE, Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Famous
Dave's of America Form 10-QSB for the twenty-six weeks ended June 29, 1997, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                         747,514
<SECURITIES>                                 6,887,893
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    271,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,737,020
<PP&E>                                      11,128,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                 412,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,498,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,051,560
<BONDS>                                        649,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       19,669,529
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,872,339)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,498,713
<SALES>                                      6,038,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,038,145
<CGS>                                        2,182,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,838,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (259,209)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,540,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,540,678)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,540,678)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3110

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide for treatment 

of distinct population segments of the Eastern oyster as separate species. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005

Mr. JINDAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide 

for treatment of distinct population segments of the 

Eastern oyster as separate species.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF DISTINCT POPULATION SEG4 MENTS OF EASTERN OYSTER AS SEPARATE 

5 SPECIES. 

6 Section 3(16) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

7 (16 U.S.C. 1532(16)) is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and any’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

9 any’’; and 
2

•HR 3110 IH 

1 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

2 ‘‘, and any distinct population segment of the East3 ern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) which interbreeds 

4 when mature’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1


 


INSPIRED ENTERTAINMENT


SHARESAVE PLAN


(U.K. Appendix)


(adopted as a subplan to the Inspired Entertainment Employee Stock
Purchase Plan)
#### § 401.605 Project-based assistance provisions.

The project-based assistance rents for a restructured project must be the restructured rents determined under the Restructuring Plan in accordance with §§ 401.410 or 401.411.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL HAYEK,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

AT&T LONG TERM DISABILITY INCOME

PLAN,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C 09-02504 JCS

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service

of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been

delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the

calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2010 __________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02504-JCS Document 28 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 25, 2020)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 75831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26320]



[[Page 75829]]

Vol. 85

Wednesday,

No. 228

November 25, 2020

Part VI





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of November 24, 2020--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to the Situation in Nicaragua


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 85 , No. 228 / Wednesday, November 25, 2020 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 75831]]

                Notice of November 24, 2020

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to the Situation in Nicaragua

                On November 27, 2018, by Executive Order 13851, I 
                declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States constituted by the situation in 
                Nicaragua.

                The situation in Nicaragua, including the violent 
                response by the Government of Nicaragua to the protests 
                that began on April 18, 2018, and the Ortega regime's 
                systematic dismantling and undermining of democratic 
                institutions and the rule of law, its use of 
                indiscriminate violence and repressive tactics against 
                civilians, as well as its corruption leading to the 
                destabilization of Nicaragua's economy, continues to 
                pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the 
                national security and foreign policy of the United 
                States. For this reason, the national emergency 
                declared on November 27, 2018, must continue in effect 
                beyond November 27, 2020. Therefore, in accordance with 
                section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 
                national emergency declared in Executive Order 13851 
                with respect to the situation in Nicaragua.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    November 24, 2020.

[FR Doc. 2020-26320
Filed 11-24-20; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F1-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Karoh 15, 1939 

Fion. C. Aurtt Potter 

county Attorney 

San Patrlclo County 

Sinton, Texas 

JhaY SlYr 

i0.r ef 8hi.S Bfrfe OY 8ny Qffiaor 

triot, eouatiy,, al%y, prooinet, aehool 

, or other muutalpal a\tb#ltl8ion of 

this Stat., bi any a’fioer er~mambef of cay 

State, dlatriot, mnmty olty aohool, diatriot 

or other ~unloi$al bo‘r'a, or ftrQa of any oCu.rt, 

arsatsd by or undar~suthtmity OS say general 

or mpeokel law oi this @ate,.ot any ember 

of MO xmogi*lature, sball appoint, or tot* for, 

or oonif.ma chm ~ppofntPirnto arw ofliae, 

position, aleHcship, aaplaymee or duty, of 
Hon. C; Burtt Potter, &x-ah 15, 1939, Page 2 

any person related within the second degree 

by affinity or within the thfrd degree by 

consanguinity to the person $0 appolntlng 

or so voting, or to any other member of any 

such board, the Legislature, or court of 

which such person so appofnttig or voting 

may be s member, when the salary, fees, or 

compensation of such appolntoe Is to be 

paid for, dlreotly or lndireotly, out of 

or from public funds or fees of ofrlce or any 

kind oc character whatsoever." 

partleular offiolal~s tlepartm3nt~ U&as to oonstltrrtr a 

*lolatlon of hTtlol0 432 ef the Pen@,2 oode. f 

It la, thsreforcr, SlU opftion of fh'ls pqartlaent and y.ou are 80 adviseU that it rill not be a'tiolation of Artlole 432 of the Penal CJ?de for the Dfstrlot 
Hon. C. Eurtt Potter, Earoh 15, 1939, Page 5 

Clerk of ybus couuty to hire as _ _ 

his deputy a daughter 

or one of your county commissioners. 

Trusting, that this satisfactorily answers 

your inquiry, we are 

Very truly your8 

GliXEWOF'1%uL9 

. 

@&-&XL&% 

, 

. . 

- 

-.
### §1339. Printing of the President's Message

The message of the President without the accompanying documents and reports shall be printed in pamphlet form, immediately upon its receipt by Congress. In addition to the usual number, fifteen thousand copies shall be printed, of which five thousand shall be for the Senate, and ten thousand for the House of Representatives.

In addition to the usual number of the President's message and accompanying documents, there shall be printed one thousand copies for the Senate and two thousand for the House of Representatives. The President's message shall be delivered by the printer to the appropriate officers of each House of Congress on or before the third Wednesday next after the meeting of Congress, or as soon after as may be practicable.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1272.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §285 (R.S. §3810; Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 615).
#### § 3280.704 [Reserved]
MISSISSIPP! CANYON SW N280089W |
SCALE: 1:100,000 er

- NOS MULTIBEAM SURVEYS gl
Contours in corrected meters . ae =|
LM,

LM147
### SUBCHAPTER II—BASIC NATIONAL RAIL PASSENGER SYSTEM
#### Mary Cerrato, Respondent, v R. H. Crown Co., Appellant.

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered November 8, 1976 in Fulton County, which granted plaintiff’s motion to amend her complaint. Special Term granted plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint setting forth two additional causes of action in strict tort liability and breach of warranty, and increasing the *ad damnum*clause from $150,000 to $500,000. CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) provides for amendment of pleadings at any time by leave of court and that such leave shall be freely given, particularly where, as in the instant case, the allegations are based on the same facts, and only additional legal theories of recovery are advanced. Defendant’s contention as to the delay in seeking relief is insufficient without a showing of prejudice *(Handley v Mirro Aluminum Co., 52*AD2d 1029). Furthermore, that the new causes of action might have been barred in a separate action *de novo,*does not affect the granting of relief. There is a relation back as long as the earlier pleading gives the adverse party sufficient notice of the transactions out of which the new claims arise (CPLR 203, subd [e]; see *Palmer v New York City Tr. Auth.,*37 AD2d 766). The increase in the *ad damnum*clause was likewise proper in view of the statement of plaintiff’s plastic surgeon indicating the severity and permanency of plaintiff’s injuries, and absent a showing of prejudice and surprise. We also note, in passing, that the warranty action is based upon personal injuries to the purchaser, a natural person and thus is cognizable under section 2-318 of the Uniform Commercial Code. It is therefore not prohibited from being maintained in conjunction with an action based on strict tort liability (cf. *Potsdam Welding & Mach. Co. v Neptune Microñoc,*57 AD2d 993; *Dickey v Lockport Prestress,*52 AD2d 1075). Order affirmed, with costs.

Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.