alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         6,194
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    112
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,424
<PP&E>                                           224
<DEPRECIATION>                                    72
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            346
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,590
<SALES>                                           70
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 155
<CGS>                                             70
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (615)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (615)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.13)
                                               


</TABLE>
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 047

- C R

NO. 09

- 1 6

- 00 048

- C R

NO. 09

- 1 6

- 00 054

- C R



### ____________________

DON ALLEN DIXON

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 359th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No s

. 15

- 08

- 0877 8 CR (Counts 1 and 2) and 14

- 11

- 12278 CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant , Don Allen Dixon, filed a motion to dismiss his appeal s. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.2 (a) . The motion is signed by the appellant personally after counsel

filed brief s which certify that counsel could find no arguable error s could be

advanced to support Dixon’s appeals. Therefore, we will treat the motion to

dismiss the appeal as a motion that was agreed to by counsel. See Tex. R. App. P.

2, 42.2 (a)

.2 Dixon’s motion to dismiss the appeals is granted , and his appeals are

therefore dismissed

.

APPEAL S DISMISSED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on June 28, 2016

Opinion Delivered June 29, 2016

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Annual Report of SNB Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Harvey Zinn, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated:
March 31, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Harvey ZinnHarvey ZinnPresident and Chief Executive Officer
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.09\Milinich, J1.or1.wpd

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFERY W MILINICH,

Petitioner,

 v.

PAM AHLIN,

Respondent(s). /

No. C 09-02612 CRB (PR)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. See

Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986) (unless an evidentiary hearing is

required, the decision to appoint counsel in habeas corpus proceedings is within the

discretion of the district court). Petitioner clearly presented his claims for relief in the

petition and an order to show cause issued. Accord Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234

(9th Cir. 1984) (although petitioner had no background in law, denial of appointment of

counsel within discretion of district court where petitioner clearly presented issues in petition

and accompanying memorandum). The court will appoint counsel on its own motion if an

evidentiary hearing is later required. See Knaubert, 791 F.2d at 728 (appointment of counsel

mandatory if evidentiary hearing is required). 

The clerk shall terminate the motion in docket number 4. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 12, 2010 CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02612-CRB Document 7 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:09-cv-02603-JL Document 22 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1 Case3:09-cv-02603-JL Document21 Filed01/07/10 Page1 of 1
### §713. Access to information

The Corporation shall make available to the Association such information as the Association determines necessary for the Association to carry out its functions under this chapter. The Association shall request from other parties which are affected by this chapter information which will enable the Association to fulfill its functions under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–236, title II, §203, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 992; Pub. L. 94–210, title VI, §607(d), Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 96; Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1149, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 675.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 substituted provisions relating to the Corporation making available to the Association all necessary information for provisions set out as subsecs. (a) to (d) respecting planning and other information availability, and enforcement procedures.

1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–210 struck out provisions prohibiting requests for information under this subsection after effective date of the final system plan.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 effective Aug. 13, 1981, see section 1169 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1101 of this title.

#### Abolition of United States Railway Association and Transfer of Functions and Securities

See section 1341 of this title.

#### Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act

Application of National Environmental Policy Act to actions of Commission not affected by title VI of Pub. L. 94–210, see section 619 of Pub. L. 94–210, set out as a note under section 791 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Smiley, Jr., Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the April Term, beginning March 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Solon B. Hanft, Esq., 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
§ 1000.428 For what reasons may HUD disapprove an application or approve an application for an amount less than that requested? HUD may disapprove an application or approve a lesser amount for any of the following reasons: ( a ) HUD determines that the guarantee constitutes an unacceptable risk. Factors that will be considered in assessing financial risk shall include, but not be limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The ratio of the expected annual debt service requirements to the expected available annual grant amount, taking into consideration the obligations of the borrower under the provisions of section 203(b) of NAHASDA;
( 2 ) Evidence that the borrower will not continue to receive grant assistance under this part during the proposed repayment period;
( 3 ) The borrower's inability to furnish adequate security pursuant to section 602(a) of NAHASDA; and
( 4 ) The amount of program income the proposed activities are reasonably estimated to contribute toward repayment of the guaranteed loan or other obligations.
( b ) The loan or other obligation for which the guarantee is requested exceeds any of the limitations specified in sections 601(c) or section 605(d) of NAHASDA.
( c ) Funds are not available in the amount requested.
( d ) Evidence that the performance of the borrower under this part has been determined to be unacceptable pursuant to the requirements of subpart F of this part, and that the borrower has failed to take reasonable steps to correct performance.
( e ) The activities to be undertaken are not eligible under either: ( 1 ) Section 202 of NAHASDA; or
( 2 ) Section 601(a) of NAHASDA.
( f ) The loan or other obligation documents for which a guarantee is requested do not meet the requirements of this subpart.
[63 FR 12349, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 71528, Dec. 3, 2012]
Williams, Renee (OST) ^^l^- { bCTT^ OLST-I^O^/VS^ J . 

From: Jervsjo, Sabrina - Manley Hot Springs, AK [Sabrina.Jervsjo@usps.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 8:08 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

To Whom it may Concern; 

My name is Sabrenia Dervsjo, I have lived in Manley for over 37 years. I would 

like to show support of our mail carrier Warbelows. I work as a mail carrier for them and I 

also work in the Post Office so I feel I my jobs here in Manley would be directly affected if 

they were to stop funding or try to cut costs. I am asking to that you retain this subsidy. 

Thank you for your time. 

Sabrenia Dervsjo 

"OIC" Manley Hot Springs Post Office 

Box 51 

Manley Hot Springs AK 99756 

907-672-3321
### §666. Court supervision of expenditures; findings; report to Secretary

In addition to other duties prescribed by section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, the court shall maintain supervision of the expenditure of funds obtained pursuant to section 662 of this title for the purpose of assuring that such funds are used solely for purposes set forth in subsection (b) of such section, shall make periodic findings regarding such expenditures, and shall report those findings to the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 91–663, §7, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1977.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, referred to in text, was classified to section 205 of former Title 11, Bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Act (act July 1, 1898, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544) was repealed effective Oct. 1, 1979, by Pub. L. 95–598, §§401(a), 402(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2682, section 101 of which enacted revised Title 11. For current provisions relating to railroad reorganization, see subchapter IV (§1161 et seq.) of chapter 11 of Title 11.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation re Mtn to Remand 1

Laurence F. Padway, #89314

Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway

1516 Oak Street, Suite 109

Alameda, California 94501

Telephone: (510)814-0680

Facsimile : (510)814-0650

Attorneys for plaintiff

Marylyn Beaver

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran and Arnold

Rebecca A. Hull, #99802

Cari A. Cohorn, #249056

rebecca.hull@sdma.com

cari.cohorn@sdma.com

One Market Plaza

Stuart Towner, 8th Floor

San Francisco, California 94501

Telephone: (415) 781-7900

Facsimile: (415) 781-2635

Attorneys for Defendant Kaiser Foundation

Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan and

Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life Insurance 

Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLYN BEAVER, No. C09-02177 WHA

Plaintiff,

vs. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING

BANK OF THE WEST SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, and ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

BANCWEST CORPORATION REMAND

WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, 

Defendants. Hon. William H. Alsup

______________________________/

METROPOLITAN LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Real Parties in Interest.

______________________________/

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 35 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation re Mtn to Remand 2

Whereas, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion to remand is due on January 28, 2010;

and

Whereas, counsel for plaintiff requires additional time because counsel for plaintiff is

working a reduced schedule for health and personal reasons,

Now, therefore, the parties stipulate to the following briefing schedule and hearing date:

February 4, 2010: Deadline for Plaintiff to file its opposition to Defendant's 

 Motion to Remand

February 11, 2010: Deadline for Defendant to file its Reply

February 25, 2010: Hearing Date

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: January 28, 2010

/s/_________________ /s/ ________________

Laurence F. Padway Rebecca A. Hull

Attorney for plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant and Real

Party in Interest

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: By: 

Honorable William H. Alsup

United States District Court Judge

January 29, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 35 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00217-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C., A.C. III, and S.P.A.C., Children

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00580

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs are taxed in this appeal. 

Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED. 

SIGNED July 31, 2019.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
### §390h–20. Hawaii reclamation projects

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary may—

(1) in cooperation with the Board of Water Supply, City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii, participate in the design, planning, and construction of a project in Kalaeloa, Hawaii, to desalinate and distribute seawater for direct potable use within the service area of the Board;

(2) in cooperation with the County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management, Hawaii, participate in the design, planning, and construction of facilities in Kealakehe, Hawaii, for the treatment and distribution of recycled water and for environmental purposes within the County; and

(3) in cooperation with the County of Maui Wastewater Reclamation Division, Hawaii, participate in the design, planning, and construction of, and acquire land for, facilities in Lahaina, Hawaii, for the distribution of recycled water from the Lahaina Wastewater Reclamation Facility for non-potable uses within the County.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

#### (c) Limitation

Funds provided by the Secretary shall not be used for the operation and maintenance of a project described in subsection (a).

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1638, as added Pub. L. 109–70, §2(a)(2), Sept. 21, 2005, 119 Stat. 2009.)
### §516. Liability of defaulting contractor

Upon failure to furnish paper, a contractor and his sureties shall be responsible for any increase of cost to the Government in procuring a supply of the paper consequent upon his default. The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall report every default, with a full statement of all the facts in the case, to the General Counsel for the Department of the Treasury, who shall prosecute the defaulting contractor and his sureties upon their bond in the district court of the United States in the district in which the defaulting contractor resides.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1245; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §12 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §10, 28 Stat. 602; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §291, 36 Stat. 1167; May 10, 1934, ch. 277, §512(b), 48 Stat. 759).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: _____2013_____-NM-____256______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 3 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 4 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 5 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 6 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 7 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 8 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 9 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 10 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 11 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 12 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 13 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 14 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 15 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 16 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 17 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 18 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 19 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 20 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 21 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 22 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 23 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 24 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 25 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 26 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 27 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 28 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 29 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 30 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 31 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 32 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 33 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 34 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 35 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 36 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 37 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 38 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 39 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 40 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 41 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 42 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 43 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 44 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 45 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 46 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 47 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 48 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 49 of 50
Case 3:09-cv-01756-SI Document 38 Filed 04/07/10 Page 50 of 50
### §1614. Timber sale contracts; modification; timber from contingency area

(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of existing National Forest timber sale contracts that are directly affected by conveyances authorized by this chapter, the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to modify any such contract, with the consent of the purchaser, by substituting, to the extent practicable, timber on other national forest lands approximately equal in volume, species, grade, and accessibility for timber standing on any land affected by such conveyances, and, on request of the appropriate Village Corporation the Secretary of Agriculture is directed to make such substitution to the extent it is permitted by the timber sale contract without the consent of the purchaser.

(b) No land conveyed to a Native Corporation pursuant to this chapter or by operation of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act which is within a contingency area designated in a timber sale contract let by the United States shall thereafter be subject to such contract or to entry or timbering by the contractor. Until a Native Corporation has received conveyances to all of the land to which it is entitled to receive under the appropriate section or subsection of this chapter, for which the land was withdrawn or selected, no land in such a contingency area that has been withdrawn and selected, or selected, by such Corporation under this chapter shall be entered by the timber contractor and no timber shall be cut thereon, except by agreement with such Corporation. For purposes of this subsection, the term "contingency area" means any area specified in a timber sale contract as an area from which the timber contractor may harvest timber if the volume of timber specified in the contract cannot be obtained from one or more areas definitely designated for timbering in the contract.

(Pub. L. 92–203, §15, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 705; Pub. L. 96–487, title IX, §908, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2447.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, referred to subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of Title 16, Conservation, and Tables.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–487 designated existing provision as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).