alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Moshe Zarmi, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinking Tools,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others with those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and

(b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

(a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely effect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weakness.

Dated: February 12, 2004
                                          By: Moshe Zarmi
                                              -----------------------
                                          Name:  Moshe Zarmi
                                          Title: President and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer and
                                                 principal accounting officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 23, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D21-1586, 3D21-1848 & 3D21-1849

Lower Tribunal No. 21-2773

________________

Maurice Symonette,

Appellant,

vs.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Beatrice 

Butchko, Judge.

Maurice Symonette, in proper person.

Gray│Robinson, P.A., and Kristie L. Hatcher-Bolin (Lakeland), Roland 

E. Schwartz and Sophie M. Labarge (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 48.23(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (providing that, subject to 
2

exceptions inapplicable herein, recording of notice of lis pendens 

“constitutes a bar to the enforcement against the property described in the 

notice of all interests . . . unrecorded at the time of recording the notice unless 

the holder of any such unrecorded interest . . . moves to intervene in such 

proceedings within 30 days after the recording of the notice and the court 

ultimately grants the motion”); Provident Funding Assocs., L.P. v. MDTR, 

257 So. 3d 1114, 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) (“The doctrine of res judicata 

provides that a judgment on the merits in an earlier suit bars a later suit on 

the same cause of action between the same parties or others in privity with 

those parties.”); Pearce v. Sandler, 219 So. 3d 961, 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) 

(“[T]he doctrine of res judicata not only bars issues that were raised, but it 

also precludes consideration of issues that could have been raised but were 

not raised in the first case.”); Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Badra, 

991 So. 2d 1037, 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“Collateral estoppel precludes 

re-litigating an issue where the same issue has been fully litigated by the 

same parties or their privies, and a final decision has been rendered by a 

court.”); Kelly v. Snietka, 155 So. 3d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) 

(explaining that court has jurisdiction to review order on motion to disqualify 

trial judge on appeal from final judgment if motion was filed prior to final 

judgment citing Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h)); Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 
3

2.330(c)(3) (requiring that motion to disqualify “be sworn to or affirmed by 

the party by signing the motion or by attaching a separate affidavit”).
### **CHAPTER 25—UNLAWFUL INCLOSURES OR OCCUPANCY; OBSTRUCTING SETTLEMENT OR TRANSIT**

Sec.
1061.
Inclosure of or assertion of right to public lands without title.
1062.
Suits for violations of law.
1063.
Obstruction of settlement on or transit over public lands.
1064.
Violations of chapter; punishment.
1065.
Summary removal of inclosures.
1066.
Permission of Secretary to sue.
#### § 232.865 Election by lender.

Where a real estate mortgage, or other security instrument has been used to secure the payment of a loan made under the provisions of this subpart and subpart C of this part, the lender may either elect to assign the loan to the Commissioner in exchange for the payment of insurance benefits or may exercise its rights under the note and security instrument in lieu of making a claim for insurance benefits. If the lender elects the latter course, the Commissioner shall be so notified and the contract of insurance shall be deemed terminated upon the date of receipt of such notification.
### §417. Reservation of easements in public lands for reclamation projects

Where, in the opinion of the Secretary, a right of way or easement of any kind over public land is required in connection with a project the Secretary may reserve the same to the United States by filing in the Bureau of Land Management and in the appropriate local land office copies of an instrument giving a description of the right of way or easement and notice that the same is reserved to the United States for Federal irrigation purposes under sections 371, 376, 377, 412, 417, 433, 438,1 462, 463,1 466, 473,1 474,1 478, 493, 494, 500, 501, and 526 of this title, in which event entry for such land and the patent issued therefor shall be subject to the right of way or easement so described in such instrument; and reference to each such instrument shall be made in the appropriate tract books and also in the patent.

(Dec. 5, 1924, ch. 4, §4, subsec. P, 43 Stat. 704; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 438 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by act Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §10, 67 Stat. 568.

Sections 463, 473, and 474 of this title, referred to in text, were repealed by act May 25, 1926, ch. 383, §47, 44 Stat. 650.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 371 of this title apply to this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Bureau of Land Management" substituted for "General Land Office" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
Order entered March 1, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01290-CV

FORGET ABOUT IT, INC., ET AL., Appellants

V.

BIOTE MEDICAL, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-01784-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s February 27, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of 

time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 25, 2019.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
### §8262d. Energy audit teams

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary shall assemble from existing personnel with appropriate expertise, and with particular utilization of the national laboratories, and make available to all Federal agencies, one or more energy audit teams which shall be equipped with instruments and other advanced equipment needed to perform energy audits of Federal facilities.

#### (b) Monitoring programs

The Secretary shall also assist in establishing, at each site that has utilized an energy audit team, a program for monitoring the implementation of energy efficiency improvements based upon energy audit team recommendations, and for recording the operating history of such improvements.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §158, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2857.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act which comprises this chapter.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1

[Proposed] Order (Richardson v. Cate, et al. - C 09-2227 WHA) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ALVIN RICHARDSON, 

Petitioner,

v. 

MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the 

California Department of Corrections and 

Rehabilitation, JOHN MARSHALL, 

Warden California Men's Colony, 

Respondent.

Case No. C 09-2227 WHA 

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING 

TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE 

ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

HABEAS CORPUS 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the time within which respondent is 

to answer the petition for writ of habeas corpus and provide the relevant state record shall be 

extended 60 days, to and including August 11, 2010. 

Dated: ___________________________ __________________________ 

 The Honorable William Alsup 

 United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02227-WHA Document 17 Filed 06/03/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 35.140 Prohibited methods of paint removal. The following methods shall not be used to remove paint that is, or may be, lead-based paint: ( a ) Open flame burning or torching.
( b ) Machine sanding or grinding without a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) local exhaust control.
( c ) Abrasive blasting or sandblasting without HEPA local exhaust control.
( d ) Heat guns operating above 1100 degrees Fahrenheit or charring the paint.
( e ) Dry sanding or dry scraping, except dry scraping in conjunction with heat guns or within 1.0 ft. (0.30 m.) of electrical outlets, or when treating defective paint spots totaling no more than 2 sq. ft. (0.2 sq. m.) in any one interior room or space, or totaling no more than 20 sq. ft. (2.0 sq. m.) on exterior surfaces.
( f ) Paint stripping in a poorly ventilated space using a volatile stripper that is a hazardous substance in accordance with regulations of the Consumer Product Safety Commission at 16 CFR 1500.3, and/or a hazardous chemical in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations at 29 CFR 1910.1200 or 1926.59, as applicable to the work.
#### MEYER v. CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 6, 1903.)

1. Judgments — Default—Vacation—Tender of Pleading.

A motion to open a default for defendant’s failure to plead, made several months after the default was entered, should not be granted where no copy of the proposed pleading was served with the motion papers.

Appeal from Special Term, New York county.

Action by Henry Meyer against the city of New York. From an order opening defendant’s default and allowing it to answer, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and HATCH, McLAUGLIN, INGRAHAM, and LAUGHLIN, JJ.

Louis Manheim, for appellant.

Theodore Connoly, for respondent.

INGRAHAM, J.

The action appears to have been commenced in December, 1901, and the defendant failed to answer or demur. Judgment was entered by default on January 15, 1902, and execiition *775was issued on the 21st day of April, 1902. On June 10, 1902, the defendant obtained an order requiring the plaintiff to show cause why the judgment should not be vacated upon an affidavit of an assistant to the Corporation Counsel, stating that the judgment was entered by an inadvertence, and an affidavit of the Deputy Comptroller, stating that he is informed and believes that there is a good and substantial defense on the merits to the cause of action set forth in the complaint; but there is no statement of the defense to be alleged in the answer, and no copy of the proposed answer is made a part of the motion papers. The special term vacated the judgment upon the payment to the plaintiff of the amount of the costs to date, and upon the payment to the sheriff of his fees under the execution, and allowing the defendant to serve an answer within 20 days after the entry of the order.

We have uniformly held that a motion to open a default upon the pleadings will not be granted unless a copy of the proposed pleadings is served with the motion papers; and there is no reason why this, rule should not be applied to the city of New York as well as to other litigants. Before a default should be opened it must appear that there is a substantial issue to be tried; and it is quite essential, in determining that question, that the pleadings proposed by the party in default should be before the court. In this case the judgment was entered almost five months before the motion was made, and there is no suggestion but that the defendant had ample time to prepare the proposed answer and serve it with the motion papers. For this reason we think the order appealed from should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, with leave to the defendant to renew the motion on payment of such costs. All concur.

¶

 1. See Judgment, vol. 30, Cent. Dig. § 317.
#### Joseph Greenspon’s Sons Iron and Steel Company, appellee, v. A. Levine & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,528.

Assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Jacob H. Hopkins, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed.

Opinion filed November 27, 1923.

Rehearing denied December 8, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Lee D. Mathias, for appellant. Charles P. Schwartz, for appellee; John R. Cochran, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
Part 5322 - Application of Labor Laws to

Government Acquisitions

DAFFARS PART 5322 Knowledge Center

Revised: June 2023

Subpart 5322.1 — BASIC LABOR POLICIES

5322.101-1 General

5322.101-3-70 Impact of Labor Disputes on Defense Programs

5322.103-4 Approvals

Subpart 5322.3 — CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS STATUTE

5322.302 Liquidated Damages and Overtime Pay

Subpart 5322.4 — LABOR STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTS INVOLVING CONSTRUCTION

5322.406-13 Semi-annual Enforcement Reports

Subpart 5322.8 — EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

5322.805 Procedures

Subpart 5322.18 — EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION

5322.1802 Policy

Subpart 5322.70 — RESTRICTIONS ON THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL FOR WORK ON

CONSTRUCTION AND SERVICE CONTRACTS IN NONCONTIGUOUS STATES

5322.7003 Waivers

Subpart 5322.1 — BASIC LABOR POLICIES

5322.101-1 General

Contracting officers must involve the Regional Labor Advisors in all labor relation actions outlined in

FAR Part 22, as required. AFI 64-106, Air Force Industrial Labor Relations Activities, identifies the

Regional Labor Advisors and their assigned geographical areas.

(e) See MP5301.601(a)(i) regarding authority to designate contracts requiring contractors to report

actual or potential labor disputes to the contracting activity in addition to the following:

(i) Construction contracts in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT);
(ii) Service contracts in excess of the SAT; and,

(iii) Any contract that contains the clause at FAR 52.222-1, Notice to the Government of Labor

Disputes, (e.g., mission critical services).

5322.101-3-70 Impact of Labor Disputes on Defense Programs

(b)(ii) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

5322.103-4 Approvals

(a) The contracting officer is designated the agency approving official.

Subpart 5322.3 — CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY

STANDARDS STATUTE

5322.302 Liquidated Damages and Overtime Pay

(c) The Regional Labor Advisors are the agency officials responsible for acting on appeals in

accordance with DFARS 222.302(2). The Chief Air Force Labor Advisor (SAF/AQCA) and the

Regional Labor Advisors are authorized to take the actions in accordance with FAR 22.302(c).

Subpart 5322.4 — LABOR STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTS

INVOLVING CONSTRUCTION

5322.406-13 Semi-annual Enforcement Reports

See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5322.8 — EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

5322.805 Procedures

(a)(8) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5322.18 — EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY
VERIFICATION

5322.1802 Policy

(d) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Subpart 5322.70 — RESTRICTIONS ON THE EMPLOYMENT

OF PERSONNEL FOR WORK ON CONSTRUCTION AND

SERVICE CONTRACTS IN NONCONTIGUOUS STATES

5322.7003 Waivers

See MP5301.601(a)(i).
#### Marilyn Jamieson et al., Respondents, v. Walter T. Lamoreaux, Jr., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
§ 23.5 Claims for settlement by Department of State or General Accounting Office. Claims for settlement by the Department of State or by the General Accounting Office shall be submitted to the Department in duplicate over the handwritten signature, together with the post office address of the claimant, and with appropriate recommendations of the officer of the Foreign Service, for items such as: ( a ) Refunds of amounts representing payroll deductions such as for any retirement and disability fund;
( b ) Amounts due deceased, incompetent, or insolvent persons including payees or bona fide holders of unpaid Government checks;
( c ) Amounts claimed from the Government when questions of fact affect either the amount payable or the terms of payment, when for any reason settlement cannot or should not be affected at the Foreign Service office; and
( d ) Amounts of checks, owned by living payees or bona fide holders, which have been covered into outstanding liabilities. The Foreign Service post or the Department of State shall be consulted before preparing the claim to ascertain whether any special form is required to be used. Claims for unpaid compensation of deceased alien employees shall be forwarded to the respective Foreign Service post.
### §1310. Commerce Department: navigation and weather information

The Secretary of Commerce may cause to be printed the number of copies of tide tables, coast pilots, and other special publications relating to the Coast and Geodetic Survey, Weather Bureau maps, charts, bulletins of not more than one hundred octavo pages, and minor reports of the Weather Bureau, he considers for the best interest of the Government.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1267.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §213 (part) (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §89, 28 Stat. 622; Mar. 13, 1896, No. 23, 29 Stat. 466; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 421, §4, 43 Stat. 1106; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §8, eff. June 30, 1940, 54 Stat. 1234; Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318).

This section incorporates only parts of former section 213 relating to Coast and Geodetic Survey and Weather Bureau. The balance will be found in sections 1102, 1116, 1302, 1308, 1309, 1336 of the revision.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Change of Name

Weather Bureau of Department of Commerce consolidated with Coast and Geodetic Survey to form a new agency in Department of Commerce to be known as Environmental Science Services Administration and office of Chief of Weather Bureau abolished by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Functions of Bureau and Chief of Bureau transferred to Secretary of Commerce by the Plan.

Environmental Science Services Administration abolished by Reorg. Plan No. 4 of 1970, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which created National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Department of Commerce. By Department Organization Order 25–5A, republished 39 F.R. 27486, Secretary of Commerce delegated to NOAA his functions relating to Weather Bureau. By order of Acting Associate Administrator of NOAA, organization name of Weather Bureau changed to National Weather Service. By order of Acting Associate Administrator of NOAA, 35 F.R. 19249, Dec. 19, 1970, Coast and Geodetic Survey redesignated National Ocean Survey. For further details, see Codification note set out under section 311 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.
#### § 350.9 Waiver of Regulations.

Ginnie Mae reserves the right in its discretion, to waive any provision(s) of these regulations in any case or class of cases for the convenience of Ginnie Mae or the United States, or in order to relieve any Person(s) of unnecessary hardship, if such action is not inconsistent with law, does not adversely affect any substantial existing rights, and the Association is satisfied that such action will not subject the Association or the United States to any substantial expense or liability.