CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management D istrict

Rule No(s): N/A Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Adopted Septembe r 19, 2006

Rule Title(s): 8-Hour Reasonably Available Control Technology - State Implementation Plan Analysis (R ACT SIP Analysis

Date Submitted to ARB: October 18, 2006

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): N/A

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Karen K. Nowak Phone Number: (760) 245-1661 x6810 E-mail Address: k2nowak@mdaqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The FCAA requires areas designated non-attainment a nd classified moderate and above to implement RACT for

sources subject to Control Technique Guidelines (CT G) documents issued by EPA for “major sources” of v olatile

organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NO x) which are ozone precursors. On March 9, 2006,

USEPA shifted its ozone standard from measurement o n a one-hour basis to an eight-hour basis (8-hour o zone

standard). For purposes of the FCAA, portions of t he District have been designated non-attainment for ozone and

classified as moderate for the 8-hour standard. As a result of the shift to the 8-hour standard, USEP A is requiring

that all non-attainment areas submit an updated RAC T SIP Analysis. The purpose of the RACT SIP Analys is is to

ensure that District Rules adequately address curre nt RACT requirements.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when imp lemented, will result in quantifiable changes in em issions. Attach reference(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculatio n sheet showing how the emission information provid ed below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Sourc e Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissio ns: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measu re: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the C ontrol Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluati on Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emis sion forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Source s Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Cont inuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) N/A of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Re ductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): N/A

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): N/A Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: N/A