alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

List of Significant Subsidiaries (as defined in Regulation S-X, Rule 1-02) of JER Investors Trust Inc.

Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries:



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company I LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company II LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER TRS Holding Company Inc. (DE)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1 Depositor, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, Limited (Cayman Islands)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2 Depositor, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2, Limited (Cayman Islands)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company GS, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT LF CMBS Finance LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Acquisition Co. 1 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Acquisition Co. 2 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Finance Co JPM, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT CS Fund I Member, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | --------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO Assets Holding LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO Mezzanine 1 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO Mezzanine 2 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO CMBS 1 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | JERIT Non-CDO CMBS 2 LLC (DE)
| | - |  | -----------------------------

Trusts



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Inc. REIT Qualification Trust
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | JERIT TS Statutory Trust I (DE)
| | - |  | -------------------------------

| |  |  | JERIT TS Administration, LLC (DE)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

US Debt
Fund



| |  |  | JER US Debt Co-Investment Vehicle, L.P.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            5,419
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 10,984
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      22,796
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            6,924
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              6,960
<LOANS>                                         100,169
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  154,353
<DEPOSITS>                                      134,017
<SHORT-TERM>                                        279
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 887
<LONG-TERM>                                          34
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          5,469
<OTHER-SE>                                       13,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   19,136
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   7,592
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1,808
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                      0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9,400
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                3,884
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3,893
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5,507
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       327
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4,099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1,682
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1,682
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     5.55 
<LOANS-NON>                                         486 
<LOANS-PAST>                                        102 
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0 
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0 
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1,112 
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       146 
<RECOVERIES>                                         46 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1,339 
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                  0 
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0 
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1,339 
                                                      
                                               

</TABLE>
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–492 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 

69) MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL 

YEAR 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 12, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 869] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 869, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 69, making 

further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for 

other purposes, under a closed rule. The resolution provides one 

hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the joint resolution (except for clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI). The resolution waives all points of order against provisions of the joint resolution. This waiver does not affect the point of order available 

under clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure). The resolution also provides that the joint resolution shall be considered 

as read. The resolution provides one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 

The resolution provides that the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker. The resolution directs the Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations to insert in the Congressional Record at any time during the remainder of the first session of the 110th Congress such 

material as he may deem explanatory of appropriations measures 

for the fiscal year. Finally, the resolution tables H. Res. 839 and 

H. Res. 850. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with HEARING

2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against the 

joint resolution or against its consideration. The waivers of all 

points of order (except for clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI) against consideration of the joint resolution and all points of order against provisions of the joint resolution are prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with HEARING
#### § 221.775 Option period.

The mortgagee may exercise its option to assign within one year following the twentieth anniversary of the date the mortgage was finally endorsed for insurance.
### §933. Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641

Section, act July 5, 1884, ch. 214, §6, 23 Stat. 104, related to powers of Secretary of War to permit extension of roads across military reservations, landing of ferries, erection of bridges, and driving of livestock. See sections 4777 and 9777 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §2243. Temperature control at Shasta Dam, Central Valley Project

The Secretary is authorized to complete the design and specifications for construction of a device to control the temperature of water releases from Shasta Dam, Central Valley Project, California, and to construct facilities needed to attach such device to the dam. There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out the authority of this section not more than $12,000,000.

(Pub. L. 102–250, title III, §303, Mar. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 58.)
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Although Plaintiff seeks $16,447.00 in its motion, the declaration in support filed by its

counsel provides an invoice that lists $16,443.00. Accordingly, the Court shall award the lower

amount.

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

IO GROUP, INC,

Plaintiff,

v.

JASON JORDAN,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-0884 MEJ

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

(DKT. #67)

 I. INTRODUCTION

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff IO Group, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Attorney’s

Fees, filed April 30, 2010. (Dkt. #67.) On April 16, 2010, the Court entered default judgment

against Defendant Jason Jordan (“Defendant”), who has now failed to file an opposition to

Plaintiff’s motion or otherwise appear in this matter since December 17, 2009. Pursuant to Civil

Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and

hereby VACATES the June 10, 2010 hearing. After consideration of Plaintiff’s moving papers,

relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and

awards attorney’s fees in the amount of $16,443.001

, as detailed below.

II. BACKGROUND

On February 27, 2009, Plaintiff filed the above-captioned matter against Defendant for

copyright infringement under the Federal Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. (Compl.,

Dkt. #1.) On May 8, 2009, after Defendant failed to respond to the Complaint, the Clerk of Court

Case 3:09-cv-00884-MEJ Document 71 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 1
### **CHAPTER 14—RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE**
§ 291.555 Refinancing. ( a ) *General.* A law enforcement officer, teacher, or firefighter/emergency medical technician may refinance the mortgage and note used to purchase the home. However, the total of the refinanced mortgage and the remaining principal balance of the second mortgage may not exceed 95 percent of the value of the property, as appraised at the time of the refinancing. Unless HUD permits subordination pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, the second mortgage described in § 291.550 must hold a superior lien position to the refinanced mortgage.
( b ) *Subordination of second mortgage.* HUD may permit subordination of the second mortgage to the refinanced mortgage, but only if HUD, at its sole discretion, determines that the refinancing will satisfy one of the following: ( 1 ) Will result in a lower annual percentage rate (APR) on the first mortgage;
( 2 ) Will be undertaken pursuant to HUD's Section 203(k) Rehabilitation Loan Insurance Program in order to rehabilitate or repair the home; or
( 3 ) Is necessary to prevent the law enforcement officer, teacher, or firefighter/emergency medical technician from defaulting on the first mortgage.
#### § 1006.307 Non-low-income families.

A family that was low-income at the times described in § 1006.305 but subsequently becomes a non-low-income family may continue to participate in the program in accordance with DHHL's admission and occupancy policies. The 10 percent limitation in § 1006.301(b)(3)(i) in this part shall not apply to such families. Such families may be made subject to the additional requirements in § 1006.301(b)(3)(ii) of this part based on those policies.

[89 FR 9762, Feb. 12, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND INTERIM CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
OF ATMOSPHERIC GLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds knowledge:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |                                                              | 
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Date:  November 13, 2007 | /s/ W. Scott McDonald                                        | 
|                         | W. Scott McDonald                                            | 
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2845

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plain woven fabrics. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plain woven 

fabrics.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLAIN WOVEN FABRICS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.54.01 Plain woven fabrics, composed of man-made fiber 

textile materials, which have 

been coated, covered or impregnated with resorcinol 

formaldehyde latex (provided 

for in subheading 

5407.10.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2845 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 30, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00352

- CR

William Roy TATE, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court

, Guadalu pe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19

- 0335

- CR

- B

Honorable William D. Old III , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State’s brief was due by December 28, 2020. On that day, the State filed a motion requesting a twenty day extension of time. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and

ORDER the State to file its brief by January 18, 2021

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of December, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNE CONWRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C09-2572 TEH

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS

TO WHY CASE SHOULD NOT

BE DISMISSED AND

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

IMPOSED

Plaintiff has now twice failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to

Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss. First, Plaintiff missed the original June 28, 2010

opposition filing deadline. Second, after this Court granted the parties’ stipulation to

continue the briefing and hearing schedule, Plaintiff missed the revised July 26, 2010

opposition filing deadline. In addition, Plaintiff has not filed any written response to the

Court’s June 30, 2010 order to show cause as to why sanctions should not be imposed for

missing the June 28, 2010 deadline. Nor has the Court received any requests for further

extensions of time.

Accordingly, with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall show cause as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to

prosecute. A written response to this order to show cause shall be filed on or before

August 6, 2010. Failure to file a timely response shall result in dismissal of this case for

failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

2. Plaintiff’s counsel shall show cause as to why she should not be sanctioned for her

repeated failure to comply with the orders and local rules of this Court. On or before

August 6, 2010, Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a written response to this second order to show

cause. This order to show cause shall remain pending, and Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a

written response, even if this case is dismissed. If the Court finds sanctions to be warranted

Case 3:09-cv-02572-TEH Document 25 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

following review of Plaintiff’s counsel’s response, it will issue an order setting a show cause

hearing date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the August 16, 2010 hearing on Defendants’ motion

to dismiss is VACATED. The Court will set a revised briefing and hearing schedule, if

necessary, after resolving whether this case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 07/27/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:09-cv-02572-TEH Document 25 Filed 07/27/10 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0737. SPRATT HOWARD v. THE STATE.

In 1996, Spratt Howard was convicted of armed robbery, and his conviction

was affirmed on appeal. See Howard v. State, 233 Ga. App. 724 (505 SE2d 768)

(1998). Howard subsequently filed multiple pro se motions attacking the validity of

his conviction, his sentence, the fairness of his treatment, and the integrity of the

judge. The trial court denied the motions by order entered September 9, 2019, and

Howard filed a notice of appeal on October 14, 2019. We lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to

be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal

is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Rowland v. State, 264

Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Howard’s notice of appeal, which was filed

35 days after entry of the trial court’s order, is untimely. We thus lack jurisdiction to

consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 09, 2019

12/09/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from PJ America's
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 26, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-26-2000
<CASH>                                            603
<SECURITIES>                                     5176
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       759
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,660
<PP&E>                                         39,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                (9,359)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,402
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           52
<OTHER-SE>                                     40,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,221
<SALES>                                        25,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               25,825
<CGS>                                           7,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                1,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (106)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                      649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,206
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .23




</TABLE>