alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                                           Exhibit 31.1

                                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kelly Absher, certify that:

1.       I have  reviewed  this  annual  report on Form 10-K,  and all  reports on Form 8-K  containing
distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in respect of periods  included in the year covered by this
annual report, of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1;

2.       Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports,  taken as a whole,  does not contain
any  untrue  statement  of a  material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading
as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.       Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing  information  required to be provided to
the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing,  or similar  agreement,  for inclusion in
these reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am  responsible  for  reviewing  the  activities  performed by the depositor and the trustee
under the  pooling and  servicing,  or similar  agreement  and based upon my  knowledge  and the annual
compliance  review  required  under  that  agreement,  and  except as  disclosed  in the  reports,  the
depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

5.       The reports  disclose all significant  deficiencies  relating to the compliance by the trustee
and the depositor with the minimum  servicing or similar  standards  based upon the report  provided by
an  independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance  with the Uniform Single
Attestation  Program  for  Mortgage  Bankers  or similar  procedure,  as set forth in the  pooling  and
servicing, or similar agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the  certifications  above, I have  reasonably  relied on  information  provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association.

                                                              By: /s/ Kelly Absher     
                                                              Name:   Kelly Absher
                                                              Title:  Vice President
                                                              Structured Obligations Corporation
                                                              Date:  March 28, 2008
```

----
### §390h–27. Antioch recycled water project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the City of Antioch, California, and the Delta Diablo Sanitation District, is authorized to participate in the design, planning, and construction of recycled water system facilities.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of the project authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost of the project.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation and maintenance of the project authorized by this section.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $2,250,000.

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1644, as added Pub. L. 110–229, title V, §512(a)(1), May 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 841.)
§ 127.2 Misrepresentation and omission of facts. ( a ) It is unlawful to use or attempt to use any export or temporary import control document containing a false statement or misrepresenting or omitting a material fact for the purpose of exporting, transferring, reexporting, retransferring, obtaining, or furnishing any defense article, technical data, or defense service. Any false statement, misrepresentation, or omission of material fact in an export or temporary import control document will be considered as made in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1001, 22 U.S.C. 2778, and 22 U.S.C. 2779.
( b ) For the purpose of this subchapter, *export or temporary import control documents* include the following: ( 1 ) An application for a permanent export, reexport, retransfer, or a temporary import license and supporting documents.
( 2 ) Electronic Export Information filing.
( 3 ) Invoice.
( 4 ) Declaration of destination.
( 5 ) Delivery verification.
( 6 ) Application for temporary export.
( 7 ) Application for registration.
( 8 ) Purchase order.
( 9 ) Foreign import certificate.
( 10 ) Bill-of-lading.
( 11 ) Airway bill.
( 12 ) Nontransfer and use certificate.
( 13 ) Any other document used in the regulation or control of a defense article, defense service, or brokering activity regulated by this subchapter.
( 14 ) Any other shipping document that has information related to the export of the defense article or defense service.
[58 FR 39316, July 22, 1993, as amended at 77 FR 16642, Mar. 21, 2012; 78 FR 52689, Aug. 26, 2013]
### §§3372, 3373. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–609, title V, §503(6), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1786

Section 3372, Pub. L. 89–754, title X, §1010, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1286; Pub. L. 90–448, title XVII, §1704, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 603; Pub. L. 91–152, title IV, §§402, 417, Dec. 24, 1969, 83 Stat. 395, 401, related to application of advances in technology to housing and urban development and provided for: statement of purpose and duties of Secretary; objectives of research and studies; execution of research and studies directly or by contract, acquisition of property, and limitation on contracts; authorization of appropriations and availability of funds for expenditures; and limitation of authority under other provisions of law. See sections 1701z–1 to 1701z–4 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

Section 3373, Pub. L. 89–754, title X, §1011, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1287, related to environmental studies and provided for: Congressional findings and comprehensive program of research, studies, surveys, and analyses; powers and duties of Secretary; advisory committees, functions, personnel, compensation, travel, and other necessary expenses; execution of studies, surveys, research, and analyses directly or by contract, and limitation on contracts; and authorization of appropriations and availability of funds for expenditures. See sections 1701z–1 to 1701z–4 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42282

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

PETER CHARLES SEE ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 866

Filed: December 16, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty

- five years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years, for aggravated assault upon law enforcement personnel and use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a crime, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

H on. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Peter Charles See pled guilty to aggravated assault upon law enforcement personnel

, I.C.
§ § 18

- 915(1), 18

- 90l(b) and 18

- 905(a) , and use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a
crime, I.C. § 19

- 2520

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed. The
state also agreed not to pursue an allegation that See was a persiste nt violator. The district court

sentenced See to a unified term of twenty

- five years, with a minimum period of confinement of
eight years

. See filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. See appeals.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 101 4

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentenc e. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, See ’s judgment of conviction and sentence a re affirmed.
§ 521.14 Separation of functions. ( a ) The investigating official, the reviewing official, and any employee or agent of the Broadcasting Board of Governors who takes part in investigating, preparing, or presenting a particular case may not, in such case or a factually related case: ( 1 ) Participate in the hearing as the ALJ;
( 2 ) Participate or advise in the initial decision or the review of the initial decision by the Director, except as a witness or representative in public proceedings; or
( 3 ) Make the collection of penalties and assessments under 31 U.S.C. 3806.
( b ) The ALJ shall not be responsible to, or subject to, the supervision or direction of the investigating official or the reviewing official.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the representative for the Government may be employed anywhere in the Broadcasting Board of Governors, including in the offices of either the investigating official or the reviewing official.
#### In the Matter of Joseph L. Freund, Deceased. Lillian Freund, as Executrix; Jacob R. Freund et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before September 11, 1962, with notice of argument for the October 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50056 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PEDRO VENEGAS, also known as Victor Torres-Gutierrez, also known as Pedro Rangel Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1562-ALL-H

-------------------- September 17, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Pedro Venegas appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for importing and possessing marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 952, and 960. Venegas argues that the district court erred in refusing to adjust his sentence downward for accepting responsibility and for being a minor participant in the offense. Given the enhancement of Venegas’ sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1, Venegas’ use of false names, his refusal to speak withNo. 01-50056 -2- the probation officer, and the great deference given to the sentencing judge, the district court’s refusal to apply the downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility was not

error. See United States v. Lujan-Sauceda , 187 F.3d 451, 452 (5th Cir. 1999). Nor is there any error in the district court’s refusal to apply the minor-participant adjustment given the large amount of marijuana involved. See United States v. Rojas , 868 F.2d 1409, 1410 (5th Cir. 1989). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 26.12 Notice of administrative action.

In every case, there shall be a notice of administrative action. The notice shall be in writing and inform the party of the nature of that administrative action. The notice shall state the reasons for the proposed or imposed action, except where general terms are permitted by 2 CFR part 2424, and shall inform the party of any right to a hearing to challenge the administrative action, and the manner and time in which to request such hearing. A supplemental notice may be issued in the discretion of the initiating official to add to or modify the reasons for the action.
Exhibit 32.1

 (a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 14, 2008



<PAGE>


(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ William Swain
                                       -----------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 14, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.105 Mortgagor supervision. ( a ) As long as the Commissioner is the insurer or holder of the mortgage, the Commissioner shall regulate the mortgagor by means of a regulatory agreement providing terms, conditions and standards established by the Commissioner, or by such other means as the Commissioner may prescribe.
( b ) The Commissioner may delegate to the mortgagee or other party the Commissioner's authority, in whole or in part, in accordance with the terms, conditions and standards established by the Commissioner in any executed Regulatory Agreement or other instrument granting the Commissioner supervision of the mortgagor.
[61 FR 14399, Apr. 1, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 61074, Oct. 13, 2000]
U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

April 7, 2010 ...

Case 3:09-cv-01758-VRW Document 30 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-01758-VRW Document 30 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

y0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141066

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141066 COA: 289212 Oakland CC: 2001-178581-FC HARRY JACOB WALTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 52319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20695]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9016-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 08/18/2014 Through 08/22/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
EIS No. 20140241, Draft Supplement, FHWA, CO, I-70 East, from I-25 to 
Tower Road, Comment Period Ends: 10/14/2014, Contact: Chris Horn 720-
963-3017.
EIS No. 20140242, Draft EIS, USFS, CO, Pawnee National Grassland Oil 
and Gas Leasing Analysis, Comment Period Ends: 10/14/2014, Contact: 
Karen Roth 970-295-6621.
EIS No. 20140243, Draft EIS, USFS, NV, Heavenly Mountain Resort Epic 
Discovery Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/28/2014, Contact: Matt 
Dickinson 530-543-2769.

    Dated: August 26, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-20695 Filed 9-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[House Report 105-98]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-98
_______________________________________________________________________

 
PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1385, THE EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING, 
                  AND LITERACY ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 1997

                                _______
                                

May 15, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

   Mr. McInnis, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 150]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 150, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1385, 
the ``Employment, Training, and Literacy Enhancement Act of 
1997'' under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of 
general debate divided equally between the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce.
    The rule makes in order the Committee on Education and the 
Workforce amendment in the nature of a substitute as an 
original bill for purpose of amendment, which shall be 
considered by division rather than by section and each division 
shall be considered as read.
    The rule waives clause 5(a) of rule XXI (appropriating on a 
legislative bill) against the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute.
    The rule also provides for the consideration of the 
(manager's) amendment numbered 1 printed in the Congressional 
Record if offered by Representative McKeon or his designee, 
which is considered as read, not subject to amendment or to a 
division of the question, and is debatable for 10 minutes 
equally divided between the proponent and an opponent. If 
adopted, the amendment is considered as part of the base text 
for further amendment purposes.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record 
prior to their consideration will be given priority in 
recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent 
with House rules. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.

                                

```
§ 241.1210 Condition for payment of insurance benefits. ( a ) All of the provisions of § 207.258 of this chapter apply to subpart F of this part, except that, if the holder of the senior insured mortgage institutes a foreclosure action, the lender shall notify the Commissioner in a timely manner of such action. The Commissioner, at its option, may then direct the lender to assign the equity or acquisition loan to the Commissioner, or bid an amount necessary to acquire the project and convey the project to the Commissioner.
( b ) If the equity loan or acquisition loan is assigned in accordance with this section, the Commissioner at a foreclosure sale may bid, in addition to amounts otherwise authorized, any sum not in excess of the aggregate unpaid indebtedness secured by the senior insured mortgage and equity or acquisition loan, plus taxes, insurance, foreclosure costs, fees and other expenses.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12046

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

SHANNON SIMMONS, 

ERANUS ROBERSON, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

versus

FUTO'S, INC., 

NOMAN RASHID, 

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

USCA11 Case: 23-12046 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12046

D.C. Docket No. 1:21-cv-03591-TWT

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon our review of the record and the parties’ responses to 

the jurisdictional questions, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of 

jurisdiction. The August 10, 2022 joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal was ineffective to dismiss Appellants’ claims against Steve 

and Charles Futo because it was not signed by all parties that had 

appeared in the litigation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); City of 

Jacksonville v. Jacksonville Hosp. Holdings, L.P., 82 F.4th 1031, 1038 

(11th Cir. 2023). The stipulation was signed only by counsel for the 

respective parties to the dismissal, and was not signed by counsel 

for Appellees. Accordingly, the purportedly-dismissed claims remain pending before the district court, and we thus lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels 

Trading FZE v. Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012).

USCA11 Case: 23-12046 Document: 21-1 Date Filed: 12/26/2023 Page: 2 of 2