alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 214.315 Recordkeeping. ( a ) *Recordkeeping system.* Each participating housing counseling agency must maintain a recordkeeping system. The system must permit HUD to easily access all information needed for a performance review. This system must meet the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, 24 CFR 1.6, and 24 CFR part 121.
( b ) *File retention requirements.* Financial records, supporting documents, statistical records and all other pertinent records, both electronic and on paper, shall be retained for a period of 3 years from the date the case file was terminated for housing counseling. If the housing counseling agency is a recipient of a HUD housing counseling grant, then the client files for the housing counseling grant year must be retained for 3 years from the date the final grant invoice was paid by HUD.
( c ) *Grant activities.* Recipients of HUD housing counseling grants are required to report activities under the grant in a format acceptable to HUD and within the designated time frames required by the applicable grant agreement.
( d ) *Race, ethnicity, and income data.* Participating agencies must maintain current and accurate data on the race, ethnicity, and income of their counseling clients and education participants.
( e ) *Client file.* The housing counseling agency must maintain a separate confidential file for each counseling client to document the action plan and the services provided to the client, as described in § 214.300. For all counseling, except for HECM counseling, the client file must include an action plan. The client file may be for an individual or household or for a group of clients with the same housing need.
( f ) *Group education file.* The housing counseling agency must maintain a separate confidential file for each course provided. This file must contain a list of all participants, their race, ethnicity and income data, course title, course outline, instructors, and date of each course.
( g ) *Confidentiality.* Participating agencies must ensure the confidentiality of each client's personal and financial information, including credit reports, whether the information is received from the client or from another source. Failure to maintain the confidentiality of, or improper use of, credit reports may subject the agency to penalties under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (14 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*).
( h ) *Termination of services.* The housing counseling agency must document in the client's file termination of housing counseling. Termination occurs or may occur under any of these conditions: ( 1 ) The client meets his or her housing need or resolves the housing problem;
( 2 ) The agency determines that further housing counseling will not meet the client's housing need or resolve the client's housing problem;
( 3 ) The agency attempts to, but is unable to, locate the client;
( 4 ) The client does not follow the agreed-upon action plan;
( 5 ) The client otherwise terminates housing counseling; or
( 6 ) The client fails to appear for housing counseling appointments.
[72 FR 55648, Sept. 28, 2007, as amended at 80 FR 75936, Dec. 7, 2015]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM SOTO, 

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

DR. REBECCA QUEZADA,

Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 09-1566 CRB (PR)

ORDER

In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the court orders that

defendant file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion by no

later than October 15, 2010. Plaintiff shall file an opposition, or notice of nonopposition, within 30 days of receiving the motion, and defendant shall file a

reply to any opposition within 15 days thereafter. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: Aug. 9, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\CR.09\Soto, W1.or1.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01566-CRB Document 17 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.111 Housing counseling. ( a ) Any housing counseling, including homeownership counseling or rental housing counseling, as defined in § 5.100, required under or provided in connection with any program administered by HUD shall be provided only by organizations and counselors certified by the Secretary under 24 CFR part 214 to provide housing counseling, consistent with 12 U.S.C. 1701x.
( b ) For purposes of this section, *required under or provided in connection with any program administered by HUD* means: ( 1 ) Housing counseling required by statute, regulation, Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA), or otherwise required by HUD;
( 2 ) Housing counseling that is funded under a HUD program;
( 3 ) Housing counseling that is required by a grantee or subgrantee of a HUD program as a condition of receiving assistance under the HUD program; or
( 4 ) Housing counseling to which a family assisted under a HUD program is referred, by a grantee or subgrantee of the HUD program.
[81 FR 90657, Dec. 14, 2016]
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,185-01

EX PARTE JERRY ANTOINE NOLAN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W15-00427-M (A) IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery, and he was sentenced to 25 years in prison.

Applicant claims that trial counsel wrongly advised him to reject a 12-year plea agreement

and that appellate counsel denied him his right to a direct appeal. See Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S.Ct.

1376 (2012); Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). The trial court entered an

order designating issues, but there are no findings of fact and conclusions of law resolving the

claims. 
-2-

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. 

The trial court shall order trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of

ineffective assistance by explaining counsels’ representation of Applicant, including applicable

strategy and tactical decisions. To obtain the responses, the trial court may use any means set out in

TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the

trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the claims raised

in the habeas application. The trial court may also make any other findings of fact and conclusions

of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be

obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 18, 2018

Do not publish
Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ Document 73 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:09-cv-02016-BZ Document 73 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Degen and Schoen Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Zemach David Development Corp., Appellant.

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 19, 1960, granting plaintiff’s motion to amend the summons and complaint so as to show that plaintiff is suing in a representative capacity, as trustee for named assignees, instead of in an individual capacity. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Law Offices

Elizabeth Karnazes 

California State Bar Number 118922

P.O. Box 4747

Foster City, California 94404-0747

Telephone (650) 345-9200

cc: David Silberman 1

Honorable Maria-Elena James June 2, 2010

Presiding Magistrate Judge

United States District Court for the Northern District of California 

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, California 94102 

Re: Karnazes v. County of San Mateo, USDC NDCA Case No. 09-767 MMC (MEJ)

Plaintiff’s Notice of unavailability served and filed March 29, 2010, BEFORE Defendants’ discovery 

motions were filed

Dear Judge James:

I again apologize to the court for this inconvenience. This letter will confirm that I filed my Notice of 

Unavailability of Counsel including the dates of June 6-27, 2010, on March 29, 2010, Docket entry #56.

Opposing counsel, David Silberman (“hereinafter referred to as “Silberman”), continues to be unwilling to 

speak with me to meet and confer on any matters in this litigation. Attorney Silberman deliberately set his 

motions during my noticed period of unavailability. I cannot possibly respond before I leave town. My 

Modified Notice of Unavailability filed May 28, 2010, Docket #80, only adds a couple of days, June 4-5, 2010,

to my previous notice. I respectfully request that the court set any hearings in this matter for July 19, 2010, or 

after. 

Additionally, I declare under penalty of perjury that I supplied a release to Mark Heitner, M.D. for all 

my records months prior to the court ordering me to do so. I am informed and believe that Dr. Heitner has 

served Defendants with my entire file and has delivery confirmation as proof thereof. I have consistently stated 

that Dr. Heitner is available to have his deposition taken and he remains available to appear for his deposition at 

an agreed date and time at his usual professional rate.

Again, I apologize for bothering the court with these problems. I believe an order compelling Attorney 

Silberman to meet and confer in person with me at the courthouse after I return from my noticed period of 

unavailability would result in a resolution of our discovery disputes such that no motion would be necessary.

I reserve the right to bring motions against Defendants for their discovery abuses, including but not 

limited to their latest discovery responses that are wholly inadequate.

Thank-you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

 Elizabeth Karnazes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Maria-Elena James

In the past six months, Plaintiff has made herself unavailable for nearly three of those 

months. (Dkt. ##34, 56, 80.) This is unfair to Defendants and disruptive to the Court's 

schedule. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall comply with Civil Local Rule 7 and all previous 

Court orders.

Case 3:09-cv-00767-MMC Document 85 Filed 06/02/10 Page 1 of 1
Document

Exhibit 10.1


—————————————————————
RATE APPLICABLE TO PARTICIPATING
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
UNDER THE DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVES
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
—————————————————————
(As in effect for 2023)


Effective for the 2023 plan year, the Board of Directors and its Compensation Committee approved an applicable interest rate of 10.77% for the Directors and Executives Deferred Compensation Plan. That rate increased from the 9.07% rate in effect for 2022, and applies prospectively to certain participants, including all participants who presently are directors or officers of First Horizon Corporation or its subsidiaries. Rates are subject to annual approval by the Board, but generally remain in effect until changed. The new interest rate, within the context of the entire Plan, has been established at a level intended to provide both retention and long-term non-compete incentives. When a participant retires after 2010 due to mandatory retirement, the participant’s interest rate during retirement will be the highest rate in place over the past three years—that is, the highest of the rates applicable during the year of retirement and the previous two years.


									
	
	1
	3Q22 FORM 10-Q, EXHIBIT 10.1
D&E PLAN RATE FOR 2023
### §940. Forfeiture of rights where railroad not constructed in five years after location

Each and every grant of right of way and station grounds made prior to February 25, 1909, to any railroad corporation under sections 934 to 939 of this title, where such railroad had not been constructed and the period of five years next following the location of said road, or any section thereof, had on that date expired, is declared forfeited to the United States, to the extent of any portion of such located line then remaining unconstructed, and the United States resumes the full title to the lands covered thereby free and discharged from such easement, and the forfeiture declared shall, without need of further assurance or conveyance, inure to the benefit of any owner or owners of land conveyed by the United States prior to such date subject to any such grant of right of way or station grounds: Provided, That no right of way on which construction was progressing in good faith on February 25, 1909, shall be in any wise affected, validated, or invalidated, by the provisions of this section.

(June 26, 1906, ch. 3350, 34 Stat. 482; Feb. 25, 1909, ch. 191, 35 Stat. 647.)
#### § 909.6 Summaries of Board decisions.

The Board may, from time to time, issue such summaries and expurgated versions of its decisions as it may consider necessary to permit the Agencies, the exclusive representative organization(s), and the members of the Service to become aware of the general nature of the cases it has received and their manner of disposition, without invading the privacy of the grievants.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2885 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2885

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacet-o-Chloro Anilide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacet-o-Chloro Anilide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETOACET-O-CHLORO ANILIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.09      Butanamide, N (2    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Chloro Phenyl) 3                                                   31/2008
                         Oxo (CAS No. 93-
                         70-9) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         2924.29.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 147

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart A appear at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019.

#### § 147.2 Application.

This part applies to all development, procurement, maintenance, and use of information and communication technology (ICT), as defined in E103.4 of appendix A to 36 CFR part 1194.

[81 FR 32646, May 24, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 37577, Aug. 1, 2019]
### SUBCHAPTER XXXII—BRANTLEY PROJECT, PECOS RIVER BASIN, NEW MEXICO
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT REYNALDO ENR

IQUE JIM ENEZM OR ATAYA, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-70664 Age n c y No. A094-933-002 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 24, 2016 ** B e fore : REINHAR

DT, W . FLETC HER , a

nd OW ENS, C irc uit Judge s . R e yna ldo EnriqueJim e ne z -M orata y a , a native and c itiz e n of El Sa l va dor, pe titions pro se

for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his motion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for a buse of disc re tion theB IA’ s de nia l of a m otion to 

# FIL ED JUN 24 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).re ope n . Lin v . Holde r , 588 F.3d 981, 984 (9th C ir. 2009). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing Jim e ne z -M orata y a ’ s m otion to re ope n a s untim e l y , whe re the m otion wa s file d m ore tha n a y e ar a fte r the B IA’ s fina l orde r, and Jim e n e z -M o ra t ay a fa ile d to pre se nt suffic ie nt e vide nc e of c ha nge d c irc um s ta nc e s in El Sa lva dor to qua lify for the re gula

tory e x c e ption to the

filing de a dline . Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), (c )(3)(ii); Lin , 588 F.3d a t 989 (B IA’ s de te rm i nation tha

t pe titione r did not e sta

b lish m ate ria l c ha

nge d c o untry

c onditions wa s not “ arbitra

ry , irrat iona l, or c ontra

ry to la w ” ). To the e xte nt Jim e ne z -M orat ay a c o nte nds he e sta

blishe d e ligibility

for re lie f, we do not re a c h

this c onte ntion in light of our disposition. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D .

1 3 - 7 0 6 6 4 2
### §753. Lines of division of half quarter sections; how run

In every case of the division of a quarter section the line for the division thereof shall run north and south, and the corners and contents of half quarter sections which may thereafter be sold, shall be ascertained in the manner and on the principles directed and prescribed by section 752 of this title, and fractional sections containing one hundred and sixty acres or upwards shall in like manner as nearly as practicable be subdivided into half quarter sections under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior, and in every case of a division of a half quarter section, the line for the division thereof shall run east and west, and the corners and contents of quarter quarter sections, which may thereafter be sold, shall be ascertained as nearly as may be, in the manner, and on the principles, directed and prescribed by the section preceding; and fractional sections containing fewer or more than one hundred and sixty acres shall in like manner, as nearly as may be practicable, be subdivided into quarter quarter sections, under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior.

(R.S. §2397.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2397 derived from acts Apr. 24, 1820, ch. 51, §1, 3 Stat. 566; Apr. 5, 1832, ch. 65, 4 Stat. 503.
### §5910. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title II, §2021(i), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 727

Section, Pub. L. 93–577, §11, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1892; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), title VII, §§703, 707, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 606, 607; 1977 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5E, 42 F.R. 56101, 91 Stat. 1634, related to environmental evaluations by Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0675

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JESUS VILLANUEVA, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER 

Before the Court is the application of Nancy G. Schwartz, attorney of 

record for Appellant/Defendant, for a 30-day extension within which to 

prepare, file and serve Appellant’s opening brief in the above-entitled 

matter. 

Good cause appearing, Appellant’s opening brief is due on

September 29, 2020. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2020

09/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0675
#### § 3285.501 Home installation manual supplements.

Supplemental instructions for optional equipment or features must be approved by the DAPIA as not taking the home out of conformance with the requirements of this part, or part 3280 of this chapter, and included with the manufacturer installation instructions.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.501 General. The Secretary shall oversee the performance of SAAs, the Secretary's agent, and primary inspection agencies as follows: ( a ) The Secretary shall review SAA reports to ensure that States are taking appropriate actions with regard to the enforcement of the standards and with respect to the functions for which they are approved under these regulations.
( b ) The Secretary shall review monitoring reports submitted by the Secretary's agent to determine that it is performing in accordance with the contract between it and the Secretary.
( c ) The Secretary shall review monitoring reports to determine whether PIAs are fulfilling their responsibilities under these regulations.
( d ) The Secretary shall make random visits for the purpose of overseeing the activities of SAAs and the Secretary's agent.
( e ) The Secretary shall take such other actions to oversee the system established by these regulations as it deems appropriate.
( f ) All records maintained by all parties acting under these regulations with respect to those actions shall be available to the Secretary, the Secretary's agent, and where appropriate, SAAs and PIAs for review at any reasonable time.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T23:12:57-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §390g–3. Evaluation of water quality impacts

The Secretary, acting through the Bureau, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "Administrator") shall enter into a memorandum-of-understanding to provide for an evaluation of the impacts to surface water and groundwater quality resulting from the groundwater recharge demonstration projects constructed pursuant to sections 390g to 390g–8 of this title. The Administrator shall consult with the United States Geological Survey and shall make maximum use of data, studies, and other technical resources and assistance available from State and local entities in conducting the evaluation. The evaluation of water quality impacts shall be completed so as to be included in the Secretary's summary report to the Congress referred to in section 390g–2(c)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–434, §5, Sept. 28, 1984, 98 Stat. 1676; Pub. L. 102–575, title XXVI, §2601(1), Oct. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 4689.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–575 substituted "summary report" for "final report".