This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. 

# Rules and Regulations Federal Register 

### 1005

Vol. 80, No. 5

Thursday, January 8, 2015

**DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE**

**28 CFR Parts 0 and 90**

**[OVW Docket No. 111]**

**RIN 1105–AB43**

**Grants To Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders** 

**AGENCY :**  Office on Violence Against Women, Justice.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule amends the regulations for the Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program (Arrest Program) to incorporate statutory changes, make minor technical corrections, and streamline existing regulations to reduce repetition of statutory language. This rule also amends the regulations to clarify that existing regulations on grant-related procedures continue to apply to grants made by the Office on Violence Against Women.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective March 9,
2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Marnie Shiels, Office on Violence Against Women, 145 N Street NE., Suite 10W.121, Washington, DC 20530, by telephone (202) 307–6026 or by email at marnie.shiels@usdoj.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Background The Violence Against Women Act and Subsequent Legislation

In 1994, Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), a comprehensive legislative package aimed at ending violence against women. VAWA was enacted on September 13, 1994, as title IV of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103– 322, 108 Stat. 1796. VAWA was designed to improve criminal justice system responses to domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking, and to increase the availability of services for victims of these crimes. VAWA recognized the need for specialized responses to violence against women given the unique barriers that impede victims from accessing assistance from the justice system. To help communities develop these specialized responses, VAWA authorized several grant programs, including the Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies Program (Arrest Program). The Arrest Program is codified at 42 U.S.C. 3796hh through 3796hh–4. The final rule for the Arrest Program, found at 28 CFR part 90, subpart D, was promulgated on August 6, 1996.

On October 28, 2000, Congress enacted the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 (VAWA 2000), Division B of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106–386, 114 Stat. 1464. On January 5, 2006, Congress enacted the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act (VAWA 2005), Pub. L. 109–162, 119 Stat. 2960. On March 7, 2013, Congress enacted the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA 2013), Pub. L. 113–4, 127 Stat. 54. These reauthorizations all enhanced the Arrest Program in different ways.
Grants To Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders Program

The Arrest Program is designed to encourage State, local, and tribal governments and State, local, and tribal courts to treat domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking as serious violations of criminal law. The Arrest Program recognizes that sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking are crimes that require the criminal justice system to hold offenders accountable for their actions through investigation, arrest, and prosecution of violent offenders, and through close judicial scrutiny and management of offender behavior. The Arrest Program challenges the community to listen, communicate, identify problems, and share ideas that will result in new responses to ensure victim safety and offender accountability. VAWA 2000 made several changes to the Arrest Program including prioritizing enforcement of protection orders, recognizing the roles of courts, probation, and parole, and addressing the specific needs of older victims and victims with disabilities. VAWA 2005 made additional changes including expanding the program to address sexual assault, adding new purpose areas, and adding new certification requirements relating to HIV testing of sex offenders and prohibiting polygraphing of sexual assault victims. VAWA 2013 added several sexual assault-specific purpose areas, a set aside of funds of 25% for projects that address sexual assault, and improved the certification and eligibility requirements. Description of Changes

This amends the regulations for the Arrest Program to comply with statutory changes and reduce repetition of statutory language.

In addition, the Violence Against Women Office Act, title IV of the 21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, Pub. L. 107–273, codified at 42 U.S.C. 3796gg–0 et seq., authorized the Office on Violence Against Women as a ‘‘separate and distinct office within the Department of Justice.’’ To avoid any possible confusion, this rule clarifies that the existing grant-making provisions of 28 CFR part 18, which set forth hearing and appeal procedures available for applicants and for recipients of certain Department of Justice grant funding, apply to grants administered by the Office on Violence Against Women.

The Office on Violence Against Women published the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register on August 5, 2014. The comment period closed on October 6, 2014. Two comments were received, both of which supported the goal of this regulation to incorporate statutory changes, make minor technical corrections, and streamline existing regulations to reduce repetition of statutory language. Neither comment made any recommendations for the regulation. Therefore, the Office on Violence Against Women is finalizing the proposed rule without change.


### 1006 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 5 / Thursday, January 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563— Regulatory Review

This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ section 1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ section 1(b), General Principles of Regulation.

The Department of Justice has determined that this rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule relates to matters of agency practice and procedure and amends the applicable regulations to conform to statutory changes.

Executive Order 13132

This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Office on Violence Against Women, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation and by approving it certifies that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities for the following reason: the economic impact is limited to the Office on Violence Against Women’s appropriated funds. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in cost or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete in domestic and export markets. List of Subjects

28 CFR Part 0

Judicial administration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Whistleblowing.

28 CFR Part 90

Grant programs—law, Judicial administration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Women.

For the reason set forth in the preamble, the Office on Violence Against Women amends 28 CFR parts 0 and 90 as follows:

**PART 0—ORGANIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE** 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 0 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 515–519.

■ 2. In § 0.122, add paragraph (c) to read as follows:

**§ 0.122 Office on Violence Against Women.** 
* * * * *

(c) Departmental regulations set forth in part 18 of this title, shall apply with equal force and effect to grant programs administered by the Office on Violence Against Women, with references to the Office of Justice Programs and its components in such regulations deemed to refer to the Office on Violence Against Women, as appropriate.

**PART 90—VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN** 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3711–3796gg–7; Sec. 826, Part E, Title VIII, Pub. L. 105–244, 112 Stat. 1581, 1815.

■ 4. Subpart D is revised to read as follows:

**Subpart D—Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of**  **Protection Orders**

Sec. 90.60 Scope. 90.61 Definitions and grant conditions. 90.62 Purposes. 90.63 Eligibility. 90.64 Speedy notice to victims. 90.65 Application content. 90.66 Evaluation. 90.67 Review of applications.

**§ 90.60 Scope.**

The eligibility criteria, purpose areas, application requirements, and statutory priorities for this program are established by 42 U.S.C. 3796hh et seq.

**§ 90.61 Definitions and grant conditions.**

(a) In general. For purposes of this subpart, the definitions and grant conditions in 42 U.S.C. 13925 apply.

(b) Unit of local government. For the purpose of this subpart, a unit of local government is any city, county, township, town, borough, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State. The following are not considered units of local government for purposes of this subpart:

(1) Police departments; (2) Pre-trial service agencies; (3) District or city attorneys’ offices; (4) Sheriffs’ departments; (5) Probation and parole departments; (6) Shelters; (7) Nonprofit, nongovernmental victim service providers; and

(8) Universities.

**§ 90.62 Purposes.**

(a) Purpose areas for the program are provided by 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(b).

(b) Grants awarded for these purposes must demonstrate meaningful attention to victim safety and offender accountability.

**§ 90.63 Eligibility.**

(a) Eligible entities. Eligible entities are described in 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c).

(b) Certifications—(1) State, local, and tribal governments. State, local, and tribal government applicants must certify that they meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)(A)–(E) or that they will meet the requirements by the statutory deadline.

(2) Courts. Court applicants must certify that they meet the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)(C)–(E) or that they will meet the requirements by the statutory deadline.

(3) State, tribal, or territorial domestic violence or sexual assault coalitions or victim service providers. Applicants that are domestic violence or sexual assault coalitions or other victim service providers must partner with a State, local, or tribal government. The partner government must certify that it meets the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(c)(A)–(E) or that it will meet the requirements by the statutory deadline.

(4) Letters. Eligible applicants or partners must submit a letter with proper certifications signed by the chief executive officer of the State, local government, or tribal government


### 1007 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 5 / Thursday, January 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

participating in the project, in order to satisfy these statutory requirements. OVW will not accept submission of statutes, laws or policies in lieu of such a letter.

(c) Partnerships—(1) Governments and courts. All State, local, and tribal government and court applicants are required to enter into a formal collaboration with victim service providers and, as appropriate, population specific organizations. Sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, or stalking victim service providers must be involved in the development and implementation of the project. In addition to the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 13925, victim service providers should meet the following criteria:

(i) Address a demonstrated need in their communities by providing servicesthat promote the dignity and selfsufficiency of victims, improve their access to resources, and create options for victims seeking safety from perpetrator violence; and

(ii) Do not engage in or promote activities that compromise victim safety.

(2) Coalitions and victim service providers. All State, tribal, or territorial domestic violence or sexual assault coalition and other victim service provider applicants are required to enter into a formal collaboration with a State, Indian tribal government or unit of local government, and, as appropriate, population specific organizations.

**§ 90.64 Speedy notice to victims.**

(a) In general. A State or unit of local government shall not be entitled to 5 percent of the funds allocated under this subpart, unless the State or unit of local government certifies that it meets the requirements regarding speedy notice to victims provided in 42 U.S.C. 3796hh(d).

(b) Units of local governments. (1) Units of local government grantees may certify based on State or local law, policy, or regulation.

(2) In the event that a unit of local government does not have authority to prosecute ‘‘crime[s] in which by force or threat of force the perpetrator compels the victim to engage in sexual activity[,]’’ the unit of local government may submit a letter from an appropriate legal authority in the jurisdiction certifying that the jurisdiction does not have the authority to prosecute ‘‘crime[s] in which by force or threat of force the perpetrator compels the victim to engage in sexual activity’’ and that therefore the certification is not relevant to the unit of local government in question. **§ 90.65 Application content.** (a) Format. Applications from eligible entities must be submitted as described in the relevant program solicitation developed by the Office on Violence Against Women and must include all the information required by 42 U.S.C. 3796hh–1(a).

(b) Certification. Each eligible applicant must certify that all the information contained in the application is correct. All submissions will be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed, and any false or incomplete representation may result in suspension or termination of funding, recovery of funds provided, and civil and/or criminal sanctions.

**§ 90.66 Evaluation.**

(a) Recipients of Arrest Program fundsmust agree to cooperate with federallysponsored research and evaluation studies of their projects at the direction of the Office on Violence Against Women.

(b) Grant funds may not be used for purposes of conducting research or evaluations. Recipients of Arrest Program funds are, however, strongly encouraged to develop a local evaluation strategy to assess the impact and effectiveness of their projects. Applicants should consider entering into partnerships with research organizations that are submitting simultaneous grant applications to the National Institute of Justice or other research funding sources for this
purpose.
**§ 90.67 Review of applications.**

The provisions of 42 U.S.C. 3796 et
seq. and this subpart provide the basis for review and approval or disapproval of applications and amendments in whole or in part.

Dated: December 23, 2014. Bea Hanson, Principal Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–30766 Filed 1–7–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**47 CFR Part 64**

**[WC Docket No. 13–39; FCC 14–175]**

**Rural Call Completion**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Final rule; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  The Commission published in the Federal Register of December 10, 2014, a document concerning an Order on Reconsideration ( Order ) affirming the Commission’s commitment to ensuring that high quality telephone service must be available to all Americans. In the Order, the Commission established rules to combat extensive problems with successfully completing calls to rural areas, and created a framework to improve the ability to monitor call problems and take appropriate enforcement action. In the Order, the Commission denies several petitions for reconsideration that, if granted, would impair the Commission’s ability to monitor, and take enforcement action against, call completion problems. The Commission does, however, grant one petition for reconsideration because the Commission finds that modifying its original determination will significantly lower providers’ compliance costs and burdens without impairing the Commission’s ability to obtain reliable and extensive information about rural call completion problems.

**DATES :**  This rule corrects an amendment that contains new or modified information collection requirements that will not be effective until approved by the Office of Management and Budget. The Federal Communications Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Claude Aiken, Wireline Competition Bureau, Competition Policy Division, (202) 418–1580, or send an email to claude.aiken@fcc.gov

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Commission published a document in the Federal Register of December 10, 2014, (79 FR 73227), amending § 64.2101 of the Commission’s rules.

In Final rule FR Doc. 2014–28936 published on December 10, 2014, (79 FR 73237), make the following correction. On page 73237, in the second column, revise amendatory instruction 2 regarding § 64.2101, and remove the‘‘(f)’’ before the definition of ‘‘Longdistance voice service.’’

The revision reads as follows:

■ ‘‘2. Amend § 64.2101 by removing the paragraph (f) designation for the definition of ‘‘Long-distance voice service’’ and revising the definition to read as follows:’’

Federal Communications Commission. Sheryl D. Todd, Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–30870 Filed 1–7–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6712–01–P**