alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §618i. Effective date

This subchapter shall be effective immediately for the purpose of the promulgation of charges, or the basis of computation thereof, and the execution of contracts authorized by the terms of this subchapter, but neither such charges, nor the basis of computation thereof, nor any such contract, shall be effective unless and until this subchapter shall be effective for all purposes. This subchapter shall take effect for all purposes when, but not before, the Secretary shall have found that provision has been made for the termination of the existing lease of the Hoover Power Plant and for the operation thereof as authorized by section 618h of this title, and that allottees obligated under contracts in force on July 19, 1940 to pay for at least 90 per centum of the firm energy shall have entered into contracts (1) consenting to such operation, and (2) containing such other provisions as the Secretary may deem necessary or proper for carrying out the purposes of this subchapter. For purposes of this section such 90 per centum shall be computed as of the end of the absorption periods provided for in regulations heretofore promulgated by the Secretary and in effect on July 19, 1940.

If contracts in accordance with the requirements of this section shall not have been entered into prior to June 1, 1941, this subchapter shall cease to be operative and shall be of no further force or effect.

(July 19, 1940, ch. 643, §10, 54 Stat. 778; Apr. 30, 1947, ch. 46, 61 Stat. 56.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Hoover Power Plant" substituted in text for "Boulder Power Plant" on authority of act Apr. 30, 1947, which changed name of Boulder Dam to Hoover Dam.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ JAMES A. CALDERJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Randall S.Goulding, certify that: 

  1)I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of INverso Corp.; 

  2)Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report; 

  3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report; 

  4)The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and we have: 

  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based upon suchevaluation; and 

  c)Disclosed in this report are any change in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

  5)The registrant’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information and 

  b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date:October 15, 2007

By:  /s/  Randall S. Goulding 

    RandallS. Goulding

    ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 242.48 Insured advances for certain equipment and long lead items.

The Commissioner may allow advances for certain pieces of equipment or other construction materials for which a manufacturer, fabricator, or other source requires an interim payment(s) in order to assure the timely manufacture or fabrication and delivery to the project site. Such advances can be made only if a bill of sale or an invoice describes the material or equipment and its completion and delivery dates in no uncertain terms, and that such displayed timetable is necessary to meet the requirements of the overall construction schedule cited in the construction contract.
§ 27.45 Transfer of title and possession. ( a ) If the Secretary is the successful bidder, the foreclosure commissioner shall issue a deed to the Secretary upon receipt of the amount needed to pay the costs listed in sections 369D ( 1 ) through ( 3 ) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 3712(1) through (3)). If the Secretary is not the successful bidder, the foreclosure commissioner shall issue a deed to the purchaser upon receipt of the entire purchase price and execution by the Secretary and the purchaser of any use agreement referred to in § 27.20(e). Any covenants reflecting terms required by § 27.20 shall be contained in the commissioner's deed.
( b ) Subject to any terms required to be agreed to by § 27.20, any commercial tenant and any residential tenant remaining in possession after the expiration of his or her lease or after the passage of one year, whichever event occurs first, shall be deemed a tenant at sufferance and may be evicted in accordance with applicable State or local law.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, David Goronkin, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FamousDave’s of America, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designatedunder our system, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report basedon such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this quarterly report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s first quarter that has materiallyaffected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Dated: August 10, 2004 /s/ David Goronkin   David Goronkin President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 52.1 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982 and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on state processes and on state, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of the Department, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the Department or its officers.
#### Carl Crane, appellant, v. James T. Wheeler, sheriff of Knox County, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,238.

Action of replevin against sheriff for possession of automobile. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. Walter C. Frank, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed August 13, 1923.

Fletcher Carney, James W. Carney and Sig. B. Nelson, for appellant. Marsh & Rice and R. C. Woolsey, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §451d. Disposal of improvements; water rights; revertibility of relinquished land

Within ninety days after receipt of notice of the approval by the Secretary of the application for exchange of entry and subject to the rights and interests of other parties, the entryman may dispose of, and he or his transferee or vendee may remove, any and all improvements placed on the relinquished unit. Upon the making of an exchange under this subchapter, any water right appurtenant to the original lands under the Federal reclamation laws shall cease and the water supply theretofore used or required to satisfy such right shall be available for disposition under those laws. Any land relinquished or conveyed to the United States under this subchapter shall revert to or become a part of the public domain and be subject to disposition by the Secretary under any of the provisions of the Federal reclamation laws.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §5, 67 Stat. 567.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation laws, referred to in text, are identified in section 451i of this title.
#### Navas Management Corp. et al., Appellants, v New York Property Insurance Association, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

In an action on an insurance policy, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 13, 1977, as, upon reargument, dismissed the second cause of action of the complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. Punitive damages do not lie against an insurance company unless it has " 'engaged in a fraudulent scheme evincing such "a high degree of moral turpitude and * * * such wanton dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations” ’ ” *(M. S. R. Assoc. v Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co.,*58 AD2d 858; *Buttignol Constr. Co. v Allstate Ins. Co.,*22 AD2d 689). The standard form policy here involved also specifically excluded losses resulting from interruption of business. Absent adequate factual allegations and opposing evidence, the second cause of action was properly dismissed. Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Serge Atlan, certify that: 

  1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of FalconTarget, Inc.;  

  2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;  

  3) Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;  

  4) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  

  a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based upon such evaluation; and  

  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  

  5) The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):  

  a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information and 

  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: October 12, 2007

By:   /s/   Serge Atlan 

    Serge Atlan

    Chairman
#### McNAIR, Appellant, v. TURNER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Action by Laura V. McNair against Henry L. Turner. No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### §866. Exchange of cut over land in Montana

Tracts of timbered lands prior to February 14, 1923, granted to the State of Montana for educational purposes, from which the timber has been cut or removed pursuant to State laws, may, under such rules and regulations as the legislature of said State shall prescribe, be exchanged for other lands of like character and approximately of equal value, in private ownership, which exchanged land shall be subject to the same requirements and limitations to the end that the State may acquire holdings in reasonably compact form and reforesting be undertaken in an economic manner, anything in the enabling act of said State to the contrary notwithstanding.

(Feb. 14, 1923, ch. 74, 42 Stat. 1245.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The enabling act of Montana, referred to in text, is act Feb. 22, 1889, ch. 180, 25 Stat. 676. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLife prediction and constitutive models for engine hot section anisotropic materials programThis report presents the results of the first year of a program designed to develop life prediction and constitutive models for two coated single crystal alloys used in gas turbine airfoils. The two alloys are PWA 1480 and Alloy 185. The two oxidation resistant coatings are PWA 273, an aluminide coating, and PWA 286, an overlay NiCoCrAlY coating. To obtain constitutive and/or fatigue data, tests were conducted on coated and uncoated PWA 1480 specimens tensilely loaded in the  100 ,  110 ,  111 , and  123 directions. A literature survey of constitutive models was completed for both single crystal alloys and metallic coating materials; candidate models were selected. One constitutive model under consideration for single crystal alloys applies Walker's micromechanical viscoplastic formulation to all slip systems participating in the single crystal deformation. The constitutive models for the overlay coating correlate the viscoplastic data well. For the aluminide coating, a unique test method is under development. LCF and TMF tests are underway. The two coatings caused a significant drop in fatigue life, and each produced a much different failure mechanism.Document ID19860015532Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSwanson, G. A.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Linask, I.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Nissley, D. M.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Norris, P. P.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Meyer, T. G.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Walker, K. P.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:174952PWA-5968-19NASA-CR-174952Accession Number86N25003Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23939Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015532.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 232.616 Disclosure and verification of Social Security and Employer Identification Numbers.

To be eligible for mortgage insurance under this subpart, the borrower must meet the requirements for the disclosure and verification of Social Security and Employer Identification Numbers, as provided by part 200, subpart U, of this chapter.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0118)

[54 FR 39695, Sept. 27, 1989]
II 

Calendar No. 403 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 318 

[Report No. 109–241] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

APRIL 20, 2006 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of April 7, 2006, by Mr. 

DOMENICI, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle Nugent 

Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as a unit 

of the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING 

4 CASTLE NUGENT FARMS. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 318 RS

1 (1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the south2 eastern shore of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is 

3 the largest parcel of privately-held land in the Virgin 

4 Islands and has been an operating cattle ranch for 

5 50 years. 

6 (2) This land has the largest and healthiest 

7 fringing coral reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands. 

8 (3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and 

9 pasturelands with considerable cultural resources in10 cluding both pre-Columbian and post-European set11 tlement. 

12 (4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large his13 toric 17th century Danish estate house that sits on 

14 over 4 miles of pristine Caribbean oceanfront prop15 erty. 

16 (5) In addition to being an area for turtle nest17 ing and night heron nesting, it is the home for the 

18 Senepol cattle breed, a unique breed of cattle that 

19 was developed on St. Croix in the early 1900’s to 

20 adapt to the island’s climate. 

21 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry 

22 out a study regarding the suitability and feasibility of des23 ignating Castle Nugent Farms as a unit of the National 

24 Park System. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 318 RS

1 (c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 

2 8(c) of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall 

3 apply to the conduct and completion of the study required 

4 by this section. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Calendar No. 403 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 318 

[Report No. 109

–241] 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study 

and for other purposes. lands, as a unit of the National Park System, tle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Isthe suitability and feasibility of designating CasAPRIL 20, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
(February 14, 1961)

#### Baron’s Cove Inn, Inc., Respondent, v. Daniel F. Mulvihill, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

On the call of the calendar, appeal dismissed; there being no appearance for appellant and appellant having failed to comply with an order of this court, dated December 19, 1960, requiring him to perfect his appeal for the February 1961 Term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.