alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 242.55 Labor standards. ( a ) Projects financed under this part (except under 24 CFR 242.91) must comply with the prevailing wage rates determined under the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141 *et seq.*), and U.S. Department of Labor regulations in 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 for compliance with labor standards laws, in accordance with section 212 of the Act, provided that supplemental loans under section 241 of the Act made in connection with loans insured under this part are subject to labor standards requirements in the same manner and to the same extent as mortgages insured under section 242 of the National Housing Act.
( b ) The requirements stated in 24 CFR part 70 governing HUD waiver of Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rates for volunteers apply to hospitals with mortgages insured under this part.
( c ) Each laborer or mechanic employed on any facility covered by a mortgage insured under this part (except under 24 CFR 242.91), but including a supplemental loan under section 241 of the Act made in connection with a loan insured under this part) shall receive compensation at a rate not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in any workweek in excess of 8 hours in any workday or 40 hours in the workweek.
( d ) Project commitments, contracts, and agreements, as determined by HUD, and construction contracts and subcontracts, shall include terms, conditions, and standards for compliance with applicable requirements set forth in 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5 and section 212 of the Act.
( e ) No advance under a loan or mortgage that is subject to the requirements of section 212 shall be eligible for insurance unless there is filed with the application for the advance a certificate as required by HUD certifying that the laborers and mechanics employed in construction of the project have been paid not less than the wage rates required under section 212.
[72 FR 67546, Nov. 28, 2007, as amended at 78 FR 8344, Feb. 5, 2013]
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM

NO. 2023 CW 0728

VERSUS

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD AND

TOMMY ABELS, IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY AS MAYOR FOR THE

TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD

SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

In Re: Town of Springfield and Mayor Tommy Abels, applying

for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 730012. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., CHUTZ AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMG

WIL

Chutz, J., dissents. I would grant the writ

and instruct the district court to transfer the

Livingston Parish per La. Code Civ. P. art. 121. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

application

matter to
### §1333. National high school and college debate topics

(a) The Librarian of Congress shall prepare compilations of pertinent excerpts, bibliographical references, and other appropriate materials relating to:

(1) the subject selected annually by the National University Extension Association as the national high school debate topic and

(2) the subject selected annually by the American Speech Association as the national college debate topic.

In preparing the compilations the Librarian shall include materials which in his judgment are representative of, and give equal emphasis to, the opposing points of view on the respective topics.

(b) The compilations on the high school debate topics shall be printed as Senate documents and the compilations on the college debate topics shall be printed as House of Representatives documents, the cost of which shall be charged to the congressional allotment for printing and binding. Additional copies may be printed in the quantities and distributed in the manner the Joint Committee on Printing directs.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1270.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., Supp. III, §170 [§276a] (Dec. 30, 1963, Pub. L. 88–246, §§1, 2, 77 Stat. 802).
# po p O S r - aoo6 - Q^j-i. i 

# CIT Y O F DECATU R ILLINOI S # 1 GARY K . ANDERSO N PLAZ A DECATUR , ILLINOI S 62523-119 6 Novembe r

16 , 201 1

> > e n o Mr . Denni s DeVany , Chie f EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Divisio n X5 3 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S.E. , Rm . W86-30 8 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Mr . DeVany , O n behal f

o f th e City o f

Decatur , I than k

yo u for you r effort s t o retai n Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t th e Decatu r

Airport , a s ou r

major industrie s (ADM , Caterpillar , Tat e & Lyle ) rel y on viabl e ai r servic e fo

r thei r continue dsucces s i n ou r community . Decatu r

Airport ha s share dth e ai r servic e option s presented , an dw e wholeheartedl y support thei r selectio n o f

Ai r Choic e On e a s th e preferre dcarrie r

for a4-year term . Ai r Choic e On e ha s prove n t o b e acommitte dcommunity partner , joinin g th e Chambe r o f Commerce , attendin g local events , an dsupportin g Decatu r are acharitabl e organizations . More importantly , Ai r

Choic e On e provide s reliable , dual hu b servic e t o St . Loui s an dChicag o O'Hare . Continuatio n o f

servic e t o O'Har e i s believe dt o b e crucia l for Decatu r t o regai n primary airport status , eliminatin g th e nee dfor subsidy . I f yo u hav e any question s o r desir e additiona l information , pleas e contac t m e a t an y tim e (217/424-2801) . Thank

yo u fo r you r consideration . Sincerely , :.~.C'y^~ >

Ryan P . McCrad y Cit y Manage r Cc : WilliamClevenger , Decatu r Par k Distric t

America' s Agribusines s Cente r
Editorial Note on Part 5
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 5 appear at 65 FR 16715, Mar. 29, 2000.

§ 5.233 Mandated use of HUD's Enterprise Income Verification (EIV) System. ( a ) *Programs subject to this section and requirements.* ( 1 ) The requirements of this section apply to entities administering assistance under the: ( i ) Public Housing program under 24 CFR part 960;
( ii ) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program under 24 CFR part 982;
( iii ) Moderate Rehabilitation program under 24 CFR part 882;
( iv ) Project-based Voucher program under 24 CFR part 983;
( v ) Project-based Section 8 programs under 24 CFR parts 880, 881, 883, 884, 886, and 891;
( vi ) Section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q);
( vii ) Section 811 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 8013);
( viii ) Sections 221(d)(3) and 236 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715l(d)(3) and 1715z-1); and
( ix ) Rent Supplement program under section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 (12 U.S.C. 1701s).
( 2 ) Processing entities must use HUD's EIV system in its entirety: ( i ) As a third-party source to verify tenant employment and income information during annual and streamlined reexaminations of family composition and income, in accordance with § 5.236 and administrative guidance issued by HUD; and
( ii ) To reduce administrative and subsidy payment errors in accordance with HUD administrative guidance.
( b ) *Penalties for noncompliance.* Failure to use the EIV system in its entirety may result in the imposition of sanctions and/or the assessment of disallowed costs associated with any resulting incorrect subsidy or tenant rent calculations, or both.
[74 FR 68934, Dec. 29, 2009, as amended at 88 FR 9655, Feb. 14, 2023]
### SUBCHAPTER III—NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3128 

To affirm that Federal employees are protected from discrimination on the 

basis of sexual orientation and to repudiate any assertion to the contrary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2005 

Mr. WAXMAN (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. 

FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. HOYER, Mr. ENGEL, Ms. 

BALDWIN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To affirm that Federal employees are protected from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and to 

repudiate any assertion to the contrary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clarification of Federal 

5 Employment Protections Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORI7 ENTATION PROHIBITED. 

8 (a) REPUDIATION.—In order to dispel any public con9 fusion, Congress hereby repudiates any assertion that 
2 

•HR 3128 IH 

1 Federal employees are not protected from discrimination 

2 on the basis of sexual orientation. 

3 (b) AFFIRMATION.—It is the sense of Congress that, 

4 in the absence of the amendment made by subsection (c), 

5 discrimination against Federal employees and applicants 

6 for Federal employment on the basis of sexual orientation 

7 is prohibited by section 2302(b)(10) of title 5, United 

8 States Code. 

9 (c) AMENDMENT.—Section 2302(b)(1) of title 5, 

10 United States Code, is amended— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

12 (D); 

13 (2) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of subpara14 graph (E); and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(F) on the basis of sexual orientation.’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,928<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,884
<PP&E>                                             438
<DEPRECIATION>                                     181
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,413
<BONDS>                                            350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,039<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,322
<SALES>                                          1,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,437
<CGS>                                            1,274
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   400<F5>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,492)<F3>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,492)<F4>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.70)
<FN>
<F1>Additional paid-up capital.
<F2>Receivables net of $400 received for doubtful accounts.
<F3>Write-off all investments in JUSTRITE.
<F4>Operating loss for the quarter ended 12/31/98.
<F5>Loss per share ($1.70) for the quarter.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### §737. Unrestricted deeds for townsite lands held by Alaska natives

The trustee or trustees to whom a patent has been issued for a townsite surveyed pursuant to section 732 or 735 1 of this title, upon a finding by the Secretary of the Interior or his authorized representative that any Alaska native who claims and occupies a tract of land within such townsite is competent to manage his own affairs and has petitioned the Secretary or his authorized representative for an unrestricted deed, or 2 shall issue to such native an unrestricted deed, and thereafter all restrictions as to sale, encumbrance, or taxation of said lands shall be removed, but said land shall not be liable to the satisfaction of any debt, except obligations owed the Federal Government, contracted prior to the issuing of such deed.

(Feb. 26, 1948, ch. 72, 62 Stat. 35.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 732 and 735 of this title, referred to in text, were repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 355e of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original.
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022.

#### § 30.15 Application of other remedies.

A civil money penalty may be imposed in addition to other administrative sanctions or any other civil remedy or criminal penalty.
### §2702. Membership; chairman; meetings

(a)(1) The Committee shall consist of the eleven members including—

(A)(i) the Secretary of the Senate;

(ii) the Clerk of the House of Representatives;

(iii) the Archivist of the United States;

(iv) the Historian of the Senate; and

(v) the Historian of the House of Representatives; and

(B) six members of whom one shall be appointed by each of the following:

(i) the Speaker of the House of Representatives;

(ii) the Minority Leader of the House of Representatives;

(iii) the Majority Leader of the Senate;

(iv) the Minority Leader of the Senate;

(v) the Secretary of the Senate; and

(vi) the Clerk of the House of Representatives.

(2) Each member appointed under paragraph (1)(B) shall have knowledge or expertise in United States history, archival management, publishing, library science, or use of legislative records.

(b) The Secretary of the Senate shall serve as Chairman during the two-year period beginning on January 1, 1991, and the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall serve as Chairman during the two-year period beginning on January 1, 1993. Thereafter, such members shall alternate serving as Chairman for a term of two years.

(c)(1) Members of the Committee referred to in subsection (a)(1)(A) shall serve only while holding such offices. Members appointed to the Committee under subsection (a)(1)(B) shall serve for a term of two years, and may be reappointed without limitation. The initial appointments for such terms shall begin on January 1, 1991.

(2) Any vacancy on the Committee shall not affect the powers of the Committee. Any vacancy in an appointed position on the Committee shall be filled in the same manner in which the original appointment was made.

(d)(1) No later than thirty days after the date on which the first session of the 102d Congress begins, the Committee shall hold its first meeting. Thereafter, the Committee shall meet semiannually or at the call of a majority of its members.

(2) Seven members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum, but a lesser number may hold hearings.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title IV, §1(d)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1417.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date on which the first session of the 102d Congress begins, referred to in subsec. (d)(1), is Jan. 3, 1991.
## Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler



## B I L L O F C O S T S

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00208-CV

Trial Court No. 9490

In the Interest of J.A.R. aka J.A.L., a child

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Clerk's record Supplemental clerk's record Reporter's record

Clerk's record Indigent Filing Required Texas.gov efiling fee Supreme Court chapter 51 fee $9.00
$37.00
$900.00
$156.00
$25.00
$100.00
$20.00
$50.00 Indigent Indigent

Rains County

APPELLANT Indigent Indigent Indigent Indigent

TOTAL: $1,297.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,
Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 4th day of May 2015

, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:

_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
Document

Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between NeoGenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Christopher Smith (the “Executive”) and is effective as of August 15, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment have the respective meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive, dated as of August 15, 2022 (the “Employment Agreement”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to modify certain terms and conditions of the Executive’s employment.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms set forth in this Amendment.




1.Relocation Benefits.


Section 2(d) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to remove “$400,000.00” from the second sentence of such Section and replace it therein with a reference to “$1,200,000.00”.




2.Restricted Stock Unit Grant.


Section 2(c) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to:


(a)Add the following sentence immediately after the first sentence of such Section:


“In addition, subject to approval by the Board or the Compensation Committee, the Executive will receive an additional one-time inducement grant of restricted stock with an aggregate target value equal to approximately $3,350,000.00 (the ‘Sign-on Grant’)”; and


(b)Add the following language to the third sentence of such Section (after giving effect to subsection (a) above) immediately following “on an annual basis over a period of four years from the date of grant”:


“(or, with respect to the Sign-On Grant, as to 100% of the restricted stock, on the fourth anniversary of the grant date).”




3.Entire Agreement. The Executive acknowledges and agrees that the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement between the












Employee and the Company with respect to the terms and conditions of his employment and supersedes all other agreements and understandings, whether written or oral.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the Company, by its duly authorized representative, and by Executive as of the date first above written.






									
	EXECUTIVE: 		THE COMPANY: 
			
	/s/ Chris Smith
		/s/ Lynn Tetrault

	Christopher Smith		Name: Lynn Tetrault
			Title: Chair and Interim CEO
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENIO PENA,

Petitioner,

 v.

R.K. WONG, Warden,

Respondent. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 09-1351 MMC (PR)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

On March 27, 2009, petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at San Quentin State

Prison and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2007 decision by the California Board of Prison

Hearings (“Board”) to deny petitioner parole. Respondent has filed an answer to the petition

and petitioner has filed a traverse.

A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit addresses important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions. See Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th

Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). Consequently, the parties will be directed to file

supplemental briefs setting forth their respective views as to the effect, if any, of the

Hayward en banc decision on the Court’s determination of the instant petition.

Case 3:09-cv-01351-MMC Document 6 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule:

1. No later than ten days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall send to

petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than twenty days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall file

and serve on petitioner a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Hayward on the instant

action. 

3. No later than twenty days from the date respondent’s supplemental brief is

filed, petitioner shall file and serve on respondent either a supplemental brief addressing the

impact of Hayward on the instant action or a notice that he does not intend to file such a

brief.

4. The parties’ respective supplemental briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages in length.

5. The matter will be deemed submitted on the date petitioner’s supplemental brief is

due. No extensions of time will be granted to file the supplemental briefs absent a showing

of exceptional circumstances. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 20, 2010 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01351-MMC Document 6 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      23.1




INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
      GlobalOptions Group, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-139368), Form S-8 (File
      No.
      333-136458), Form S-3 (File No. 333-149020) and Post-Effective Amendment No.
      1
      to Form SB-2 on Form S-3 (File No. 333-145053) of our report dated March 26,
      2008 with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
      GlobalOptions Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
      and
      for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, appearing in the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of GlobalOptions Group, Inc. for the year ended December
      31,
      2007. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts”
in such Prospectuses.





/s/
                  Marcum & Kliegman LLPMarcum
                  & Kliegman LLP




New
      York,
      New York





March
      26,
      2008
#### Philip J. Klingman, appellee, v. Walter F. Halleman, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,047.

Suit for damages for alleged breach of contract for sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago;- the Hon. Frank E. Reed, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

George J. Gilbert, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.