alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-QSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,011
<PP&E>                                           8,192
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          609,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           778
<OTHER-SE>                                    (537,760)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,489
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (96,342)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11
                                     
                  Metris Companies Inc. and Subsidiaries
                     Computation of Earnings Per Share
              (in thousands, except share and per share data)
<TABLE>
                                      Three Months Ended        Six Months Ended
                                            June 30,                   June 30,
                                       1998          1997          1998          1997
Basic:
Net incomet available to common
  <S>                            <C>   <C>     <C>    <C>     <C>   <C>      <C>   <C>
  stockholders                   $     12,400  $      9,719   $     23,624   $     17,457
                                                                
Weighted average number of                             
 common shares outstanding            19,225        19,225         19,225         19,225
                                
Net income per share            $        .64  $        .51   $       1.23   $        .91
                              
Diluted:                              
Net income available to
 common stockholders            $     12,400  $     9,719    $     23,624   $     17,457
                              
Weighted average number of
 common shares outstanding            19,225       19,225          19,225         19,225

Net effect of assumed exercise       
 of stock options based on                 
 treasury stock method using
 average market price                   757          917            713             937
                                  
                                     19,982       20,142         19,938          20,162
                                                                    
Net income per share            $      .62    $      .48     $     1.18     $       .87
</TABLE>
§ 26.45 General. ( a ) *Time of hearing.* The hearing shall commence not later than 90 days following the date of the Government's filing of the complaint and response with the Docket Clerk under § 26.38, unless the time is extended for good cause. The ALJ shall provide written notice to all parties of the reasons for any extension of time.
( b ) *Location of hearing.* The hearing shall be held in a place most convenient for the respondent and witnesses, or in such other place as may be agreed upon by the parties and the ALJ.
( c ) *Notice of hearing.* The ALJ shall issue a notice of hearing to all parties specifying the time and location of the hearing, the matters of fact and law to be heard, the legal authority under which the hearing is to be held, a description of the procedures for the conduct of the hearing, and such other matters as the ALJ determines to be appropriate.
( d ) *Exceptions for Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act matters.* For Program Fraud Civil Remedies actions, the hearing is commenced by the issuance of a notice of hearing and order by the ALJ, as set forth in 31 U.S.C. 3803(d)(2)(B). Hearings for Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act matters shall be located in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(g)(4).
( e ) *Burden and standard of proof.* HUD shall prove the respondent's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence. Respondent shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( f ) *Public hearings.* Unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown, the hearing shall be open to the public.
#### Breck Contracting Corp., Appellant, v Fox Ledge Corp. (Ilemar Corp.) et al., Respondents.

Appeals by plaintiff from six orders of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, all dated July 7, 1977, each of which denied a motion to amend a notice of mechanic’s lien. Orders affirmed, without costs' or disbursements. While we do not regard plaintiff’s motions to amend *nunc pro tunc,*brought on by orders to show cause, as an attempt to reargue a prior order denying such relief, we find that on the record presented plaintiff has failed to establish that the work and materials were furnished on October 21, 1973 as it claims. Suozzi, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §1743. Disclosure of financial interests by officers or employees

#### (a) Annual written statement; availability to public

Each officer or employee of the Secretary and the Bureau who—

(1) performs any function or duty under this Act; and

(2) has any known financial interest in any person who (A) applies for or receives any permit, lease, or right-of-way under, or (B) applies for or acquires any land or interests therein under, or (C) is otherwise subject to the provisions of, this Act,

shall, beginning on February 1, 1977, annually file with the Secretary a written statement concerning all such interests held by such officer or employee during the preceding calendar year. Such statement shall be available to the public.

#### (b) Implementation of requirements

The Secretary shall—

(1) act within ninety days after October 21, 1976—

(A) to define the term "known financial interests" for the purposes of subsection (a) of this section; and

(B) to establish the methods by which the requirement to file written statements specified in subsection (a) of this section will be monitored and enforced, including appropriate provisions for the filing by such officers and employees of such statements and the review by the Secretary of such statements; and

(2) report to the Congress on June 1 of each calendar year with respect to such disclosures and the actions taken in regard thereto during the preceding calendar year.

#### (c) Exempted personnel

In the rules prescribed in subsection (b) of this section, the Secretary may identify specific positions within the Department of the Interior which are of a nonregulatory or nonpolicymaking nature and provide that officers or employees occupying such positions shall be exempt from the requirements of this section.

#### (d) Violations; criminal penalties

Any officer or employee who is subject to, and knowingly violates, this section, shall be fined not more than $2,500 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title III, §313, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2768.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), (2), is Pub. L. 94–579, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2743, known as the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in subsec. (b) of this section relating to the requirement that the Secretary report to Congress on June 1 of each calendar year, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and the 2nd item on page 108 of House Document No. 103–7.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RON MOSLEY,

Petitioner,

 v.

ROBERT WONG, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

No. C 09-1749 TEH (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit, Hayward

v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010)

(en banc), addressed important issues relating to federal habeas

review of BPH decisions denying parole to California state

prisoners. As such, the Court will provide each party an

opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not to exceed ten (10)

pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc

decision applies to the facts presented in Petitioner’s challenge to

BPH’s decision denying him parole. 

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-01749-TEH Document 8 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

The Court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than July 2, 2010, Respondent must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts presented

in Petitioner’s case. 

2. No later than July 30, 2010, Petitioner must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts presented

in his case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 06/10/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.09\Mosley-09-1749-hayward briefing.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01749-TEH Document 8 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
#### MATHOT, Respondent, v. TRIEBEL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by William L. Mathot against Frederick E. Triebel. No opinion. Motion denied. The plaintiff needs no leave in order to move for judgment. The existing provision for the costs of the appeal we deem correct.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2460 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2460

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain yarn of carded 
                          Kashmir (cashmere).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

 Mr. Simmons introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain yarn of carded 
                          Kashmir (cashmere).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN YARN OF CARDED KASHMIR (CASHMERE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain yarn of carded 
Kashmir (cashmere)) is amended as follows:
            (1) By striking ``of 6 run or finer (equivalent to 19.35 
        metric yarn system)'' and inserting ``of 19.35 metric yarn 
        count or finer''.
            (2) By striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Third Department,

February, 1978

(February 27, 1978)**

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Eugene Pellac, Respondent, v Atlantic Beach Club et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondents.

**

 Not published with other decisions of February, 1978, 61 AD2d 846. [Rep.

Motion to compel the Workmen’s Compensation Board to serve and file a brief on issues raised by appellants’ appeal from the decision filed March 7, 1973, and for alternative relief. Motion granted, without costs, to the extent that the appeal from the decision dated March 24, 1977, shall be heard on the brief and appendix filed and served on or about December 2, 1977, and upon the board’s original files in the cases listed in the full record list dated April 30, 1976. Respondent board’s time to file a brief is extended to 20 days from the date of this decision. In his brief the Attorney-General is requested to furnish the basis for the board’s action which conditioned approval of appellants’ application to the board for a shortened record on appellants’ consenting to limit the issues on the appeal from the decision dated March 7,1973, to a question of substantial evidence. Cross motion by respondent board to dismiss notice of appeal dated April 21, 1977, denied, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Larkin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ KIMBERLY K. SCHAEFERKimberly K. SchaeferChief Executive Officer
### §55. Contract, rule, regulation, or device exempting from liability; set-off

Any contract, rule, regulation, or device whatsoever, the purpose or intent of which shall be to enable any common carrier to exempt itself from any liability created by this chapter, shall to that extent be void: Provided, That in any action brought against any such common carrier under or by virtue of any of the provisions of this chapter, such common carrier may set off therein any sum it has contributed or paid to any insurance, relief benefit, or indemnity that may have been paid to the injured employee or the person entitled thereto on account of the injury or death for which said action was brought.

(Apr. 22, 1908, ch. 149, §5, 35 Stat. 66.)
Exhibit 10.20
 (AHCCCS LOGO)
    
    ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIONDIVISION OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE
SECTION A: CONTRACT
 1. AMENDMENT
    
    2. CONTRACT
    
    3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF
    
    4. PROGRAMNUMBER:
    

NO.:
    

AMENDMENT:11
    
    YH09-0001-04
    
    October 1, 2009
    
    DHCM  ACUTE
  Health Choice Arizona
410 N. 44th Street, Suite 900
Phoenix, AZ 85008
   ADD
to Section B, CAPITATION RATES after
first subparagraph add the following language
 §38-2005 02,
   Mark Held Mark.Held@azahcccs.gov
 Sr. Procurement Specialist AHCCCS Contracts and Purchasing  Steward.McKenzie@azahcccs.gov
 8. EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED FOR HEREIN, ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL
CONTRACT NOT HERETOFORE
CHANGED AND/OR AMENDED REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL EFFECT.
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HERETO SIGN THEIR NAMES IN AGREEMENT
 9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:
/s/ Carolyn Rose
    
    10: SIGNATURE OF AHCCCSA CONTRACTING OFFICER:
/s/ Michael VeitTYPED NAME: CAROLYN ROSE
    
    TYPED NAME: MICHAEL VEITTITLE: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    
    TITLE: CONTRACTS & PURCHASING ADMINISTRATORDATE: 11/2/10
    
    DATE: OCT 8 2010




---



##### 



ARIZONA HEALTH CARE COST CONTAINMENT SYSTEM
ACUTE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT SUMMARY  Rural
Health Choice Arizona
CYE 2010
 Supplemental Payment Related To :
 TANF
    
    
    TANF
    
    
    SSI
    
    
    SSI
    
    
    
    
    
    
    TotalSupplemental Payment:
    
    <1 M/F
    
    
    14-44 F
    
    
    w/ Med
    
    
    w/o Med
    
    
    Non-MED
    
    
    Payment4 Apache/Coconino/Mohave/ Navajo
    
    $
    582,995.18
    
    
    $
    1,109,571.48
    
    
    $
    178,467.91
    
    
    $
    257,147.32
    
    
    $
    654,382.35
    
    
    $
    2,782,564.2410 Pima/Santa Cruz
    
    $
    119,746.21
    
    
    $
    179,019.32
    
    
    $
    18,422.49
    
    
    $
    13,616.87
    
    
    $
    19,573.90
    
    
    $
    351,178.79$
    3,133,743.03
   Health Choice Arizona
    
    PaymentBenson Hospital
    
    $
    Carondolet Holy Cross
    
    $
    217,862.31Cobre Valley Community Hospital
    
    $
    Copper Queen Community Hospital
    
    $
    La Paz Regional Hospital
    
    $
    77,347.64Little Colorado Medical Center
    
    $
    378,953.09Mount Graham Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    Summit Healthcare Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    1,302,758.78Northern Cochise Community Hospital
    
    $
    Page Hospital
    
    $
    156,347.39Payson Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    Sage Memorial Hospital
    
    $
    94,828.54Sierra Vista Regional Health
    
    $
    Southeastern Az Medical Center
    
    $
    Valley View Medical Center
    
    $
    791,629.41Verde Valley Medical Center
    
    $
    White Mountain Regional Medical Center
    
    $
    51,141.01Wickenburg Regional Health Center
    
    $
    YRMC East
    
    $
    Total Payments
    
    $
    3,071,068.17Premium Tax
    
    $
    62,674.86Total with Premium Tax
    
    $
    3,133,743.03
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Jacob C. Cohen, Deceased. Eisenberg & Weiss, Respondent-Appellant; Ada Turkish, Appellant-Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2110 to fix attorney’s fees, (1) Ada Turkish appeals from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, entered October 27, 1977, as vacated her interrogatories and (2) petitioner cross-appeals from so much of the same order as precluded it from taking the deposition of Ada Turkish. Order affirmed, without costs or *999disbursements. There is no merit to either party’s appeal. They should proceed to a determination of the proceeding without engaging in dilatory tactics. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
#### § 267.1 Credit risk retention exceptions and exemptions for HUD programs.

The credit risk retention regulations codified at 12 CFR part 43 (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency); 12 CFR part 244 (Federal Reserve System); 12 CFR part 373 (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation); 17 CFR part 246 (Securities and Exchange Commission); and 12 CFR part 1234 (Federal Housing Finance Agency) include exceptions and exemptions in subpart D of each of these codified regulations for certain transactions involving programs and entities under the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

[79 FR 77766, Dec. 24, 2014]
§ 3286.1 Purpose. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this part is to establish the regulations that are applicable to HUD's administration of an installation program that meets the requirements of sections 602 (42 U.S.C. 5401) and 605 (42 U.S.C. 5404) of the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974. The purpose of this subpart A is to establish the regulations that are applicable with respect to all manufactured homes before they are sold to a purchaser. The requirements in subpart A apply regardless of whether the actual installation of a manufactured home is regulated by HUD or a state with a qualifying installation program.
( b ) *Implementation.* This part is effective on October 20, 2008. Implementation will be undertaken in accordance with the phased-in schedule provided by notice published in the Federal Register.
#### § 578.79 Limitation on transitional housing.

A homeless individual or family may remain in transitional housing for a period longer than 24 months, if permanent housing for the individual or family has not been located or if the individual or family requires additional time to prepare for independent living. However, HUD may discontinue assistance for a transitional housing project if more than half of the homeless individuals or families remain in that project longer than 24 months.
#### § 570.602 Section 109 of the Act.

Section 109 of the Act requires that no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance made available pursuant to the Act. Section 109 also directs that the prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of age under the Age Discrimination Act and the prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of disability under Section 504 shall apply to programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance under Title I programs. The policies and procedures necessary to ensure enforcement of section 109 are codified in 24 CFR part 6.

[64 FR 3802, Jan. 25, 1999]