alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VITECH       
AMERICA, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE  
30, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.                      
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998  
<CASH>                                          33,295,091  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,319,570  
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,681,216  
<INVENTORY>                                     51,253,971  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,386,449  
<PP&E>                                          19,432,462  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,150,003  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,695,913  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,643,024  
<BONDS>                                         61,967,430  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                        25,506,848  
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,883,142  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,695,913  
<SALES>                                         72,410,486  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,410,486  
<CGS>                                           43,137,869  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,284,573  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,827,375  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,905,187  
<INCOME-TAX>                                       606,560  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,030,601  
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,030,601  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.58  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.57  
                                                            

</TABLE>
- Front Matter
Title Page

- Introduction
- Background Information
- Data and Methodology
- Results and Discussion
- Summary and Conclusion
- References
- Demographic and Health Surveys Working Papers Series

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T02:33:45-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
EXHIBIT 32.1

Polypore, Inc.    Chief Executive Officer Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Polypore, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Toth, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/ROBERT B. TOTHRobert B. Toth
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
March 14, 2007

---



QuickLinks
June 13, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: Teleconference with Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO) 

Attendees: 

HECO: 

Tom Simmons, Vice President Power Supply 

Ron Cox, Vice President Generation & Fuels 

Darcy Endo-Omoto, Vice President Government & Community Affairs 

Brenner Munger, Manager Environmental Department 

Lisa Kikuta, Director Government & Public Affairs 

Susan Char, Director Government Relations 

Karin Kimura, Senior Environmental Scientist 

Stephen Ward, Senior Environmental Scientist 

Steve Oppenheimer, Associate General Counsel 

Kerstan Wong, Principal Environmental Scientist 

Tom Roberts, Van Ness Feldman, P.C. 

EPA: 

Kevin Culligan, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD 

Robert Wayland, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/ESG 

William Maxwell, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/ESG 

Josh Lewis, EPA/OA/OCIR/IMD 

Discussion: 

A general discussion of the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards was held.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:

/s/
John EmeryJohn EmeryChief Executive Officer
### §1117. Annual reports: discontinuance of printing of annual or special reports to keep within appropriations

In order to keep expenditures for printing and binding within appropriations, heads of executive departments, independent offices and establishments of the Government may discontinue the printing of annual or special reports under their respective jurisdictions. When the printing of reports is discontinued the original copy shall be kept on file in the office of the heads of the respective departments, independent offices or establishments for public inspection.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1264.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §213a (Aug. 1, 1953, ch. 304, title I, §103, 67 Stat. 332).

The term "executive departments, independent offices, and establishments of the Government" is substituted for "executive departments, independent agencies, and establishments" for uniformity.
### §1107. Appropriations chargeable for printing and binding of documents or reports

The cost of printing and binding of documents or reports emanating from executive departments, independent agencies or establishments of the Government which, before March 30, 1906, was charged to appropriations for congressional printing and binding or to appropriations other than to executive departments, independent agencies or establishments, shall be charged as follows:

(1) the cost of illustrations, composition, stereotyping, and other work involved in the actual preparation for printing, apart from the creation of the manuscript, to the appropriation for printing and binding of the agency in which the document or report originates.

(2) the balance of cost, to congressional printing and binding appropriations or to appropriations for printing and binding of the executive departments, independent agencies or establishments in proportion to the number of copies delivered to each.

(3) the cost of copies distributed other than through Congress or executive agencies or independent offices, as otherwise provided.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1261.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §214 (Mar. 30, 1906, No. 13, 34 Stat. 825).

A proviso in the 1906 resolution, requiring annual estimates of probable costs for departmental printing is omitted as obsolete.
§ 50.11 Responsibility of the HUD approving official. ( a ) The HUD approving official shall make an independent evaluation of the environmental issues, take responsibility for the scope and content of the compliance finding, EA or EIS, and make the environmental finding, where applicable. (Also, see § 50.32.)
( b ) Copies of environmental reviews and findings shall be maintained in the project file for projects, in the rules docket files for Federal Register publications, and in program files for non-Federal Register policy documents.
Abatement Order filed October 25, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00832

- CV

____________ NABILCO INC. AND D. HOUSTON, INC. D/B/A TREASURES , Appellants
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS A ND THE CITY OF HOUST ON, Appellee s

On Appe al from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 28683



### A B A T E M E N T O R D E R
On October 19, 2012, appellants filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing a notice of removal of this case to federal court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d). Accordingly, the appeal is ABATED until any party files a verified copy of an order remanding the case to state court. The appeal is treated as a closed case and removed from this court’s active docket.

PER CURIAM
[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation To Continue CMC 

 (Case No. CV 09 2192 MMC) 

300034266.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

COLONIAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST, a 

California Not-For-Profit corporation dba 

MERCY HOSPITAL; GOLDEN EMPIRE 

MANAGEMENT CARE, A MEDICAL 

GROUP, INC., a California corporation; and 

MANAGED CARE SYSTEMS, LP, 

Defendants. 

 Case No.: CV 09 2192 MMC 

Complaint Filed: May 19, 2009 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

RELATED REQUIREMENTS, 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-2

Case 3:09-cv-02192-MMC Document 52 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 2
2 

[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation To Continue CMC 

 (Case No. CV 09 2192 MMC) 

300034266.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PROPOSED ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing thereon, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Case Management Conference shall be continued to May 7, 2010, with all 

other requirements of Local Rule 16-2 to be met timely with regards to the continued date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _______________, 2010 

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Court Judge 

March 1

Case 3:09-cv-02192-MMC Document 52 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-121434 on Form S-8of our report dated March 22, 2005 (November 29, 2005 as to Note15), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Great WolfResorts, Inc. and subsidiaries and the combined financial statements of Great Lakes Predecessor(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating tothe adoption of SFAS 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics ofBoth Liabilities and Equity” and an explanatory paragraphrelating to the restatements described in Note 15), appearing in thisannual report on Form 10-K/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2004./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPMilwaukee, Wisconsin
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00139

- CV

VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellant

v.

Dennis B. GILLETT , WPM Construction Services, Inc., Clark

- Hunt JV, Clark Construction Group, LLC, and Hunt Construction Group, Inc., Appellees

From the 288th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 00934 Honorable Solomon Casseb, III , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 11, 2012

DIS MISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal asserting it no longer desires to prosecute

the appeal because the matter had been resolved. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties

regarding the assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
§ 401.420 When must the Restructuring Plan require project-based assistance? The Restructuring Plan must provide for the section 8 contract to be renewed as project-based assistance, subject to the availability of funds for this purpose, if: ( a ) The PAE determines there is a market-wide vacancy rate of 6 percent or less;
( b ) At least 50 percent of the units in the project are occupied by elderly families, disabled families, or elderly and disabled families; or
( c ) The project is held by a nonprofit cooperative ownership housing corporation or nonprofit cooperative housing trust.
#### PATTERSON, Respondent, v. WOLFE et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Margaret Patterson against Fred Wolfe and Nellie Wolfe.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of the County Court of Orange county affirmed, with costs. HOOKER, J., not voting.
### §2704. Powers of the Committee

(a) For purposes of carrying out the duties referred to under section 2703, the Committee or, on the authorization of the Committee, any subcommittee or member thereof, may hold such hearings, sit and act at such times and places, take such testimony, and receive such evidence as is appropriate.

(b) The Committee may secure directly from any department or agency of the United States such information as the Committee may require to carry out the duties referred to under section 2703. Upon request of the Chairman of the Committee, the head of such department or agency shall furnish such information to the Committee.

(Added Pub. L. 101–509, title IV, §1(d)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1418.)
§ 3.215 Membership practices of certain organizations. ( a ) *Social fraternities and sororities.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of social fraternities and sororities that are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), the active membership of which consists primarily of students in attendance at institutions of higher education.
( b ) *YMCA, YWCA, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA), the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.
( c ) *Voluntary youth service organizations.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of a voluntary youth service organization that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), and the membership of which has been traditionally limited to members of one sex and principally to persons of less than nineteen years of age.
### §418. Private lands within project; agreement as to disposal of excess over farm unit

Before any contract is let or work begun for the construction of any reclamation project adopted after August 13, 1914, the Secretary of the Interior shall require the owners of private lands thereunder to agree to dispose of all lands in excess of the area which he shall deem sufficient for the support of a family upon the land in question, upon such terms and at not to exceed such price as the Secretary of the Interior may designate; and if any landowner shall refuse to agree to the requirements fixed by the Secretary of the Interior, his land shall not be included within the project if adopted for construction.

(Aug. 13, 1914, ch. 247, §12, 38 Stat. 689.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Owen Vest, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The defendant has been convicted of assault, second degree, in violation of subdivision 5 of section 242 of the Penal Law. An altercation arose between defendant and two police officers in connection with the efforts of the latter to have defendant move his automobile. After this had been accomplished, the officers returned to their car and were followed by defendant. The patrolmen were sitting alone in their car with no other persons near when it is claimed defendant addressed vile and insulting words to one of the officers, who announced that defendant was under arrest. In the ensuing fracas it is contended the assault was committed. The court correctly instructed the jury “that the arrests were not lawful arrests, unless you find that the defendant Vest had committed disorderly conduct.” The statutory definition of the latter offense was given to the jury. (Penal Law, § 722, subd. 2.) There was a proper instruction that proof of lawful arrest was required. Finally, in response to a request, the court charged that the use of the offensive, insulting language was not sufficient to constitute the offense without proof that it annoyed or disturbed others. Upon the present record there was no evidence from which a finding could be made that the acts of appellant could reasonably be held to have been done “ with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or whereby a breach of the peace [might] be occasioned ” so as to have constituted the offense of disorderly conduct (cf. *People*v. *Perry,*265 N. Y. 362, 364). *“*The conduct charged must at least be such that a breach of the peace lias become imminent or might reasonably be expected or intended to flow from such conduct.” *(People*v. *Monnier,*280 N. Y. 77, 79.) (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court convicting defendant of the crime of assault, second degree.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
[No. 7287.

Decided June 13, 1908.]

#### James Jensen, *Respondent,*v. William F. Sheard *et al., Appellants,*John B. Overfield *et al., Respondents.**1*

Appeal — Decisions Reviewable- — Costs. Appeal does not lie upon a mere question of costs.

Same- — -Review—Parties Entitled — Invited Error — Dismissal. Appellants cannot allege error in findings wliicli are substantially identical with the findings requested by them; and that being the only error urged, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for pierce county, Miller, J., entered December 2, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose mechanics’ liens.

Appeal dismissed.

*F. S. Blattner (Frank H. Kelley,*of counsel), for appellants.

*Theo. D. Powell, Frederick H. Murray, Eugene Carr, H. R. Lea, Ira A. Town,*and *Wm. H. Pratt,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 96 Pac. 2.

Per Curiam.

In this action sundry parties, by complaint and cross-complaint, sought to foreclose liens for labor and material against certain real property owned by the defendant William F. Sheard, and from a judgment in favor of the several lien claimants, Sheard and wife have appealed.

The respondents have interposed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the findings of fact and conclusions of law made and entered by the court are identical with the findings and conclusions proposed by the appellants. A comparison of the findings made and the proposed findings, as set forth in the appellants’ brief, shows this to be substantially true. The only difference we have been able to discover, aside from mere *594clerical errors, is that the appellants claimed costs in favor of the appellant Elizabeth Sheard, whereas, the court dismissed her from the case without costs. Should we assume that the court was in error in this regard an appeal will not lie to this court on a mere question of costs. Notwithstanding the identity of the findings made by the court with the findings proposed by the appellants, the latter have excepted to the findings as made, and to the refusal to find as requested, and assign error on the court’s rulings. But it is a well settled rule of practice in all courts that a party will not be heard to complain of invited error or of rulings made at his request. *Gottstein v. Seattle Lum.*& *Com. Co.,*7 Wash. 424, 35 Pac. 133; *Gilmore v. Baker Co.,*12 Wash. 468, 41 Pac. 124; *State ex rel. Bickford v. Benson,*21 Wash. 365, 58 Pac. 217; *North Yakima v. Scudder,*41 Wash. 15, 82 Pac. 1022; 3 Cyc. 242 *et seq.*

Had the court signed the findings and conclusions proposed by the appellants, the judgment appealed from would follow as a matter of course, and for that reason the appellants cannot be heard in opposition to the judgment. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted. Since the submission of the case, certain persons who were not parties to the action have moved the court to strike their names from the notice of appeal, appeal bond and brief. The conclusion we have reached on the motion to dismiss renders a decision on this motion unnecessary. Appeal dismissed.