alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6377

JAMES AVERY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONNIE MOATS, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-3569)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Avery, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

November 5, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on November 6, 1998. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.d. 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

James Avery seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction because Avery’s notice of appeal was not

timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed.

R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

November 6, 1998.* Avery’s notice of appeal was filed on March 9,

1999. Because Avery failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 66

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 66 appear at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999.

#### § 66.1 Introduction.

These regulations amend the Code of Federal Regulations to conform with Pub. L. 99-93. Pub. L. 99-93 amended the National Endowment for Democracy Act (22 U.S.C. 4411, et. seq.) to require the National Endowment for Democracy (hereinafter “NED”) to comply fully with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) (hereinafter “FOIA”), notwithstanding that NED is not an agency or establishment of the United States Government. NED will make information about its operation, organization, procedures and records available to the public in accordance with the provisions of FOIA.
### §1443. Cancellation of leases of public lands used as airports made under law in force May 24, 1928

With the consent of the lessee, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to cancel any lease of public lands for use as public aviation fields or airports, made under law in force May 24, 1928, and to lease such lands to the lessee upon the conditions prescribed by section 1442 of this title.

(May 24, 1928, ch. 728, §3, 45 Stat. 729.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was previously classified to section 213 of former Title 49, Transportation.
### §991. Title of purchasers of unconfirmed lands in Arkansas confirmed

The title of all persons who had, on April 29, 1898, purchased from the State of Arkansas any unconfirmed swamp land and held deeds for the same, is confirmed and made valid as against any claim or right of the United States, and without the payment by said persons, their heirs or assigns, of any sum whatever to the United States or to the State or Arkansas.

The State of Arkansas does hereby relinquish and quitclaim to the United States all lands prior to April 29, 1898, confirmed, certified, or patented to the State which have been entered under the public land laws; and does cede, relinquish, and quitclaim to the United States all right, title, and interest under the Acts of September 28, 1850, March 2, 1855, and March 3, 1857, in and to all lands in the State which have been heretofore granted, confirmed, certified, or patented by the United States under any other Acts, and the title to such lands is confirmed in the grantees, their heirs, successors, or assigns, anything in this section or any other Act to the contrary notwithstanding: Provided, That this section shall be of no force or effect until the State of Arkansas shall have accepted and approved the conditions, limitations, and provisions herein contained by an act of the general assembly or by an instrument in writing duly executed by the governor under the authority conferred upon him by the legislature of said State, and filed with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of the Interior within one year from April 29, 1898: Provided further, That whereas the General Assembly of the State of Arkansas did, on the 10th day of March, 1897, accept and approve the conditions, limitations, and provisions herein contained before April 29, 1898, making the same effective and conclusive, therefore this section shall be in full force and effect from and after April 29, 1898.

(Apr. 29, 1898, ch. 229, §§3, 4, 30 Stat. 368.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of September 28, 1850, referred to in text, is act Sept. 28, 1850, ch. 84, 9 Stat. 519, which is not classified to the Code.

Act of March 2, 1855, referred to in text, is act Mar. 2, 1855, ch. 147, 10 Stat. 634, which is not classified to the Code.

Act of March 3, 1857, referred to in text, is act Mar. 3, 1857, ch. 117, 11 Stat. 251, which is not classified to the Code.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

THOMAS WOOD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 312 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
§ 1000.128 Is income verification required for assistance under NAHASDA? ( a ) Yes, the recipient must verify that the family is income eligible based on anticipated annual income. The family is required to provide documentation to verify this determination. The recipient is required to maintain the documentation on which the determination of eligibility is based.
( b ) The recipient may require a family to periodically verify its income in order to determine housing payments or continued occupancy consistent with locally adopted policies. When income verification is required, the family must provide documentation which verifies its income, and this documentation must be retained by the recipient.
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------

                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 20, 2006



<PAGE>




(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William Swain, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ William Swain
                                       -----------------

                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7390

TIMOTHY LEE COLES,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections; A. 

COTRELL; S. CHAMBERS; D. FORBES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:11-cv-00192-REP)

Submitted: March 26, 2012 Decided: April 6, 2012

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lee Coles, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Lee Coles appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Coles v. 

Virginia, No. 3:11-cv-00192-REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2011). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Woods, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 346]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed *{see,*CPL 450.90 [1]; *People v Sullivan,*275 *1008App Div 1016). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Court, Pietruszka, J. — Demolition.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Wisner and Kehoe, JJ.
### §9810. Financial assistance to low-income families, local cooperative associations, and local public or private nonprofit organizations or entities; amount, purposes, etc.

(a) The Secretary is authorized to provide financial assistance, including loans having a maximum maturity of fifteen years and in amounts not resulting in an aggregate principal indebtedness of more than $3,500 at any one time, to any low-income rural family where, in the judgment of the Secretary, such financial assistance has a reasonable possibility of effecting a permanent increase in the income of such families, or will contribute to the improvement of their living or housing conditions, by assisting or permitting them to—

(1) acquire or improve real estate or reduce encumbrances or erect improvements thereon;

(2) operate or improve the operation of farms not larger than family sized, including but not limited to the purchase of feed, seed, fertilizer, livestock, poultry, and equipment; or

(3) participate in cooperative associations, or finance nonagricultral 1 enterprises which will enable such families to supplement their income.

(b) The Secretary is authorized to provide financial assistance to local cooperative associations or local public and private nonprofit organizations or agencies in rural areas containing concentrations or substantial numbers of low-income persons for the purpose of defraying all or part of the costs of establishing and operating cooperative programs for farming, purchasing, marketing, processing, and to improve their income as producers and their purchasing power as consumers, and to provide such essentials as credit and health services. Costs which may be defrayed shall include—

(1) administrative costs of staff and overhead;

(2) costs of planning and developing new enterprises;

(3) costs of acquiring technical assistance; and

(4) initial capital where it is determined by the Secretary that the poverty of the families participating in the program and the social conditions of the rural area require such assistance.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §621, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 493.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "nonagricultural".
### §1528. Authorization of appropriations

(a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for construction of the Central Arizona Project, including prepayment for power generation and transmission facilities but exclusive of distribution and drainage facilities for non-Indian lands, $832,180,000 plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering cost indices applicable to the types of construction involved therein and, in addition thereto, such sums as may be required for operation and maintenance of the project.

(b) There is also authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 for construction of distribution and drainage facilities for non-Indian lands plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering and cost indices applicable to the types of construction involved therein from September 30, 1968: Provided, That the Secretary shall enter into agreements with non-Federal interests to provide not less than 20 per centum of the total cost of such facilities during the construction of such facilities. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1543 of this title, neither appropriations made pursuant to the authorization contained in this subsection nor revenues collected in connection with the operation of such facilities shall be credited to the Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund and payments shall not be made from that fund to the general fund of the Treasury to return any part of the costs of construction, operation, and maintenance of such facilities.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title III, §309, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 97–373, Dec. 20, 1982, 96 Stat. 1817.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–373 substituted "There is also authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 for construction of distribution and drainage facilities for non-Indian lands plus or minus such amounts, if any, as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in construction costs as indicated by engineering and cost indices applicable to the types of construction involved therein from September 30, 1968: Provided, That the Secretary shall enter into agreements with non-Federal interests to provide not less than 20 per centum of the total cost of such facilities during the construction of such facilities" for "There is also authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 for construction of distribution and drainage facilities for non-Indian lands".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  601,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (26,400)
<INVENTORY>                                    214,516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,118,030
<PP&E>                                       1,387,317
<DEPRECIATION>                               (523,052)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,207,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,726,507
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,284
<OTHER-SE>                                   (637,341)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,207,620
<SALES>                                      9,188,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,188,037
<CGS>                                        6,451,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,519,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (68,671)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,292,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,292,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,292,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### HALL v. GILMAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Helen P. Hall against Theophilus Gilman.

No opinion. Motion denied.
#### CROCKER WHEELER CO. v. VARICK REALTY CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by the Crocker Wheeler Company against the Varick Realty Company and others. No opinion. Motion granted.
§ 251.3 Case-by-case conversion to full insurance. Upon the request of a coinsuring lender, the Commissioner may endorse a coinsured Mortgage for full insurance, effective as of the date of such endorsement, if the Commissioner is satisfied that: ( a ) Continuing the Mortgage under coinsurance could jeopardize the lender's viability and ability to service its remaining portfolio of coinsured Mortgages;
( b ) The lender has made reasonable efforts to work out any Mortgage default consistent under 24 CFR 251.811 (1990), but the remedies available to the lender have not been adequate to reinstate the Mortgage;
( c ) The conversion would be less costly to HUD than if the Mortgage remained coinsured;
( d ) The lender has paid HUD the fee set forth through Federal Register notice; and
( e ) The lender agrees to give the Commissioner written notice under 24 CFR 207.258 of its intent to file an insurance claim upon the Commissioner's endorsement of the Mortgage for full insurance.
[61 FR 49038, Sept. 17, 1996]
1667 K Street NW, Suite 300 | Washington, DC 20006 | www.cspa.org | p.202

‐ 872

‐ 8110 f.202

‐ 223

‐ 2636 

### CAPHRA PBPK Modeling Working Group Meeting with EPA PBPK Modeling #1 November 6, 2014, 1:00 PM Potomac Yards South - 9100 Agenda 1. Introductions 2. CAPHRA Conceptual Framework – 10 min – T. Osimitz 3. Use of an in vitro-based model development approach to support risk assessment for pyrethroids - Presentati on by M. Yoon – 20 min 4. Use of Model by EPA

a. Features needed b. Parameter inputs
c. Application to Risk Assessments 5. Approaches to Read-Across 6. Timeline for preparation for SAP 7. Other Participants Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division Anna Lowit, Kelly Lowe, Monique Perr on, Jaime D’Agostino, and William Irwin CAPHRA Paul Hinderliter (Syngenta), Miyoung Yeon and Harv ey Clewell (The Hamner), Tom Osimitz (Science Strategies)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JCC HOLDING
COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,237
<PP&E>                                         353,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                     666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 467,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,562
<BONDS>                                        320,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   467,411
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   103
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,721)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,721)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.06)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II,
L.P. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the fiscal ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the
Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Fund.

                                   /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Robert K. Moskovitz
                                   Chief Financial Officer (and chief accounting
                                   officer) of the General Partner

                                   March 31, 2005