alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Plant Name FIPS Plant ID Point ID Stack ID ORIS ID Boiler ID Segment Latitude

BIG BROWN 48161 2 10 10 3497 1 0 31.8197

BIG BROWN 48161 2 11 11 3497 2 0 31.8203

COLETO CREEK PLANT 48175 2 1 1 6178 1 0 28.7108

LIGNITE-FIRED POWER PLANT 48013 7 1 13 6183 SM-1 0 28.7072

MARTIN LAKE ELECTRICAL STATION 48401 11 6 5 6146 1 0 32.2603

MARTIN LAKE ELECTRICAL STATION 48401 11 7 6 6146 2 0 32.2597

MARTIN LAKE ELECTRICAL STATION 48401 11 8 7 6146 3 0 32.2589

MONTICELLO STM ELE STN 48449 3 7 7 6147 1 0 33.0906

MONTICELLO STM ELE STN 48449 3 9 9 6147 2 0 33.0911

MONTICELLO STM ELE STN 48449 3 10 10 6147 3 0 33.0922

RELIANT ENERGY LIMESTONE 48293 10 2 2 298 LIM1 0 31.4175

RELIANT ENERGY LIMESTONE 48293 10 3 3 298 LIM2 0 31.4214

SANDOW STEAM ELECTRIC 48331 5 15 16 6648 4 0 30.5658

TOLK STATION 48279 18 1 1 6194 171B 0 34.1797

TOLK STATION 48279 18 2 2 6194 172B 0 34.1797

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 1 1 3470 GT1 0 29.4819

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 5 26 3470 WAP4 0 29.4833

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 6 6 3470 WAP5 0 29.4767

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 7 7 3470 WAP6 0 29.4758

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 8 8 3470 WAP7 0 29.4744

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 14 18 3470 WAP8 0 29.4736

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 2 23 3470 WAP1 0 29.4825

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 3 24 3470 WAP2 0 29.48194

W A PARISH STATION 48157 5 4 44 3470 WAP3 0 29.48278

WELSH POWER PLANT 48449 5 10 11 6139 3 0 33.0564

WELSH POWER PLANT 48449 5 11 12 6139 2 0 33.0564

WELSH POWER PLANT 48449 5 12 13 6139 1 0 33.0564
Avg. Lat. Longitude Avg. Long.

-96.055

31.8200 -96.0553 -96.0552

-97.2139

-98.4722

-94.5711

-94.5706

32.2596 -94.5703 -94.5707

-95.0372

-95.0378

33.0913 -95.0378 -95.0376

-96.2544

31.4195 -96.2533 -96.2539

-97.0631

-102.575

34.1797 -102.575 -102.5750

-95.6317

-95.6297

-95.6356

-95.635

-95.6339

-95.6339

-95.6306

-95.6311

29.4792 -95.63 -95.6324

-94.8458

-94.8458

33.0564 -94.8458 -94.8458
§ 26.15 Amendments and supplemental pleadings. ( a ) *Amendments.* ( 1 ) By right: The Department may amend its complaint without leave at any time within 30 days of the date the complaint is filed or at any time before respondent's responsive pleading is filed, whichever is later. Respondent may amend its answer without leave at any time within 30 days of filing of its answer. A party shall plead in response to an amended pleading within 15 days of receipt of the amended pleading.
( 2 ) By leave: Upon conditions as are necessary to avoid prejudicing the public interest and the rights of the parties, the hearing officer may allow amendments to pleadings upon motion of any party.
( 3 ) Conformance to evidence: When issues not raised by the pleadings, but reasonably within the scope of the proceeding initiated by the complaint, are tried by express or implied consent to the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings, and amendments of the pleadings necessary to make them conform to the evidence shall be allowed at any time.
( b ) *Supplemental pleadings.* The hearing officer may, upon reasonable notice, permit service of a supplemental pleading concerning transactions, occurrences, or events that have happened or been discovered since the date of prior pleadings.
### §§561 to 563. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section 561, Pub. L. 91–518, title IV, §401, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1334; Pub. L. 93–146, §9, Nov. 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 551, related to assumption of intercity rail passenger service by National Railroad Passenger Corporation. See section 24701 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 562, Pub. L. 91–518, title IV, §402, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1335; Pub. L. 92–316, §5, June 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 229; Pub. L. 93–146, §10, Nov. 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 552; Pub. L. 94–210, title VII, §706(a), (h), formerly §705(a), (h), Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 123, 125, renumbered Pub. L. 96–254, title II, §206(a), May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 95–421, §15, Oct. 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 96–73, title I, §114, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 542; Pub. L. 96–254, title II, §216, May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 418; Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §§1181, 1188(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 693, 699; Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §§4006, 4017(b), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 107, 110; Pub. L. 101–641, §9(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4658, related to facilities and service agreements. See sections 24308, 24311, and 24903 of Title 49.

Section 563, Pub. L. 91–518, title IV, §403, Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1335; Pub. L. 92–316, §6, June 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 229; Pub. L. 93–146, §11(a), Nov. 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 553; Pub. L. 93–496, §5, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1527; Pub. L. 94–25, §§5, 6, May 26, 1975, 89 Stat. 90; Pub. L. 94–210, title VII, §706(c), (i), formerly §705(c), (i), Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 124, 125, renumbered Pub. L. 96–254, title II, §206(a), May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 412; Pub. L. 94–555, title I, §107, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2616; Pub. L. 95–421, §§16–18, Oct. 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 929, 930; Pub. L. 96–73, title I, §115, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 542; Pub. L. 96–254, title II, §213, May 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 417; Pub. L. 96–448, title V, §508(f), Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1958; Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §§1182(a), 1183(e), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 693, 697; Pub. L. 99–272, title IV, §4014(a)(1), Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 109; Pub. L. 102–533, §§7(b), 10, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3519, 3520, related to State supported institution or retention of rail passenger service. See sections 24703, 24704, and 24708 of Title 49.
for 

Sm.811 Land Watiare UAVs 

is awarded to: · 

Joseph Charron 

for completion of the required Small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (RAVEN-DOL

Instruction (Course# 4D-F8/600-F19). This training includes 80 hours of ins

evaluation consisting of 22 Lessons, located at Kandahar, Afghanistan. This c

UAV Operations, Techniques, and Problem Solving, Air Space Command and 

Equipment Setup, Maintenance, Developing Individual and Team Skills, plus 

Training tasks. These skills will be used effectively in a Combat Enviro

You are hereby recognized as a certified UAV (RAVEN) operator

//'' /..., // / 

, .. ,1' - " / 

/ r " /?' __. - ·.... 

(__ - I / ( 10 MAY 2011 {}.,;,_ 

CLIFF BRANDT JACK D. .. - 

(, / DATE 

Product Director, SUAS, GS-15 Training Manager, SUAS, G

CLASS# May 2011 ·5 KAF
### §3516. Rules and regulations

The Director shall promulgate rules, regulations, or procedures necessary to exercise the authority provided by this subchapter.

(Added Pub. L. 104–13, §2, May 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 182; amended Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title X, §1064(b)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–275.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3516, added Pub. L. 96–511, §2(a), Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2824, related to rules and regulations prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 104–13.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–398 substituted "subchapter" for "chapter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–398 effective 30 days after Oct. 30, 2000, see section 1 [[div. A], title X, §1065] of Pub. L. 106–398, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under former section 3531 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1995, except as otherwise provided, see section 4(a) of Pub. L. 104–13, set out as a note under section 3501 of this title.

#### Policy and Procedural Guidelines

Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(3) [title V, §515], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–153, provided that:

"(a) In General.—The Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall, by not later than September 30, 2001, and with public and Federal agency involvement, issue guidelines under sections 3504(d)(1) and 3516 of title 44, United States Code, that provide policy and procedural guidance to Federal agencies for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies in fulfillment of the purposes and provisions of chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, commonly referred to as the Paperwork Reduction Act.

"(b) Content of Guidelines.—The guidelines under subsection (a) shall—

"(1) apply to the sharing by Federal agencies of, and access to, information disseminated by Federal agencies; and

"(2) require that each Federal agency to which the guidelines apply—

"(A) issue guidelines ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including statistical information) disseminated by the agency, by not later than 1 year after the date of issuance of the guidelines under subsection (a);

"(B) establish administrative mechanisms allowing affected persons to seek and obtain correction of information maintained and disseminated by the agency that does not comply with the guidelines issued under subsection (a); and

"(C) report periodically to the Director—

"(i) the number and nature of complaints received by the agency regarding the accuracy of information disseminated by the agency; and

"(ii) how such complaints were handled by the agency."
#### Seymour Joseph, Appellant, v Howard N. Friedman et al., Defendants, and Amrep Corporation, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 29, 1976, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, is unanimously affirmed, without costs, and without disbursements and without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint, and thereafter, renewal of defendant’s application for security and any applications addressed to such new complaint that defendants may be advised to make. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action was premature was properly granted for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Fein at Special Term. However, thereafter, a pending criminal action was concluded and four of the individual defendants were found guilty and AMREP was fined $45,000. Accordingly, matters have occurred which might give plaintiff a cause of action which is now ripe. Concur— Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans and Capozzoli, JJ.
Exhibit 99.2







Independent Accountant’s Report








Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)


One Wells Fargo Center


301 South College Street


Charlotte, NC 28288





U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)


Corporate Trust Department


100 Wall Street


New York, NY 10005








Re:
STRATSTrust For IBM Corporation Securities, Series 2004-7 (the “Trust”)




Ladies and Gentlemen:





We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank National Association, (the “Trustee” and together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of June 15, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), in respect of the STRATS Trust For IBM Corporation Securities, Series 2004-7 (the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based on our examination.





Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2010.








/s/ Aston Bell, CPA





New York, New York


March 21, 2011
§ 574.340 Additional standards for community residences. ( a ) A community residence is a multiunit residence designed for eligible persons to provide a lower cost residential alternative to institutional care; to prevent or delay the need for such care; to provide a permanent or transitional residential setting with appropriate services to enhance the quality of life for those who are unable to live independently; and to enable such persons to participate as fully as possible in community life.
( b ) If grant funds are used to provide a community residence, except for planning and other expenses preliminary to construction or other physical improvement for a community residence, the grantee must, prior to the expenditure of such funds, obtain and keep on file the following certifications: ( 1 ) *A services agreement.* ( i ) A certification that the grantee will itself provide services as required by § 574.310(a) to eligible persons assisted by the community residence; or
( ii ) A certification that the grantee has entered into a written agreement with a project sponsor or contracted service provider to provide services as required by § 574.310(a) to eligible persons assisted by the community residence;
( 2 ) *The adequacy of funding.* ( i ) A certification that the grantee has acquired sufficient funding for these services; or
( ii ) A certification that the grantee has on file an analysis of the service level needed for each community residence, a statement of which grantee agency, project sponsor, or service provider will provide the needed services, and a statement of how the services will be funded; and
( 3 ) *Capability.* ( i ) A certification that the grantee is qualified to provide the services; or
( ii ) A certification that the project sponsor or the service provider is qualified to provide the services.
[57 FR 61740, Dec. 28, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 17200, Apr. 11, 1994]
EXHIBIT 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT








I, Ryan M. Hershberger, certify that:





(a)    A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 has been made under my supervision.





(b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.








Dated March 22, 2022


/s/ Ryan M. HershbergerRyan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-C
§ 3280.105 Exit facilities; exterior doors. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75744 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) *Number and location of exterior doors.* Manufactured homes shall have a minimum of two exterior doors located remote from each other. ( 1 ) Required egress doors shall not be located in rooms where a lockable interior door must be used in order to exit.
( 2 ) In order for exit doors to be considered *remote* from each other, they must comply with all of the following: ( i ) Both of the required doors must not be in the same room or in a group of rooms which are not defined by fixed walls.
( ii ) *Single wide units.* Doors may not be less than 12 ft. c-c from each other as measured in any straight line direction regardless of the length of path of travel between doors.
( iii ) *Double wide units.* Doors may not be less than 20 ft. c-c from each other as measured in any straight line direction regardless of the length of path of travel between doors.
( iv ) One of the required exit doors must be accessible from the doorway of each bedroom without traveling more than 35 feet. The travel distance to the exit door must be measured on the floor or other walking surface along the center-line of the natural and unobstructed path of travel starting at the center of the bedroom door, curving around any corners or permanent obstructions with a one-foot clearance from, and ending at, the center of the exit door.
( b ) *Door design and construction.* ( 1 ) Exterior swinging doors shall be constructed in accordance with § 3280.405 the “Standard for Swinging Exterior Passage Doors for Use in Manufactured Homes”. Exterior sliding glass doors shall be constructed in accordance with § 3280.403 the “Standard for Windows and Sliding Glass Doors Used in Manufactured Homes”.
( 2 ) All exterior swinging doors must provide a minimum 28-inch wide × 74-inch high clear opening. Door seals are permitted to reduce the opening, either vertically or horizontally, a maximum of one inch. All exterior sliding glass doors must provide a minimum 28-inch wide × 72-inch high clear opening.
( 3 ) Each swinging exterior door other than screen or storm doors shall have a key-operated lock that has a deadlocking latch or a key-operated dead bolt with a passage latch. Locks shall not require the use of a key for operation from the inside.
( 4 ) All exterior doors, including storm and screen doors, opening outward shall be provided with a safety door check.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 50 FR 9269, Mar. 7, 1985; 78 FR 73981, Dec. 9, 2013]
#### Maurice T. Weinshenk, appellee, v. David H. Weiss & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,364.

Suit for commission for selling oil stock. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Harry A. Lewis, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed with a finding of facts.

Opinion filed October 2, 1923.

John Elliott Byrne, for appellant; Joel C. Baker, of counsel. McCormick, Kirkland, Patterson & Fleming, for appellee; W. A. Keplinger, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, Respondent, v Tarry Brae Hotel, Inc., Doing Business as Gilbert’s Hotel et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed April 13, 1973, as amended by decision filed June 29, 1973 and November 18, 1976, as amended by decision, filed January 18, 1977, which reversed a referee’s decision finding that Howard Silverberg did not die from a compensable industrial accident, and that prior to his death Silverberg had been illegally employed by the employer and affirmed a referee’s decision finding that this is a "no-dependency” claim and making appropriate awards to the Special Funds under the provisions of subdivision 9 of section 15, subdivision 3 of section 25-a and section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The board found: "The decedent, Howard Silverberg, sustained fatal injuries on 12/26/65 while a passenger in an automobile owned by Bernard Katz and operated by a co-employee, Jay A. Katz, who also sustained a fatal injury when the vehicle was involved in an accident. * * * the carrier had full opportunity to contest the decision in the Katz claim and that such decision is controlling in the Silverberg claim. * * * decedent on 12/26/65 was enroute from the quarters provided by the employer to the hotel where he was employed to go swimming, that this swimming activity was not prohibited but was permitted by the employer. * * * the fatal injury while enroute to the hotel premises was reasonably incidental to and a risk of the employment and * * * the fatal accident arose out of and in the course of his employment.” In its supplemental decision, the board further found that, "the carrier is estopped from denying liability in the No-Dependency Death Fund Claim.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
§ 206.302 Establishment of the HECM Counselor Roster. ( a ) *HECM Counselor Roster.* FHA maintains a Roster of HECM counselors. Only counselors listed on the Roster and employed by a participating agency are approved to provide HECM counseling. A prospective borrower applying for a HECM loan to be insured by FHA must receive the required HECM counseling from one of the counselors on the Roster.
( b ) *Disclaimer.* The inclusion of a HECM counselor on the Roster does not create or imply a warranty or endorsement by FHA of the listed counselor to a prospective HECM borrower or to any other organization or individual, nor does it represent a warranty of any counseling provided by the listed HECM counselor. The inclusion of a counselor on the Roster means that a listed counselor has met the FHA-prescribed qualifications and conditions for inclusion on the Roster and that the counselor is approved to provide HECM counseling by telephone or face-to-face.
#### § 107.21 Prevention of discriminatory practices.

All persons receiving assistance from, or participating in any program or activity of the Department involving housing and related facilities shall take all action necessary and proper to prevent discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion (creed), sex or national origin.

[45 FR 59514, Sept. 9, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 31360, Aug. 2, 1985]
#### In the Matter of Dorothy Mitchell, as Guardian for Keith Randall, and Others, Petitioner, v Philip L. Toia, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Article 78 proceeding for review of orders of State Department of Social Services and city Department of Social Services transferred to this court by order of Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 7, 1977, is unanimously held in abeyance for 30 days following the date of the order hereon. Pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd [e]), respondents, State and city Commissioners of Social Services, are directed, within 30 days after the date of this order, to supplement their answers by supplying the following materials to correct defects or omissions in their answers: (a) A correct or corrected copy of the first full paragraph on page 2 of the "Decision Ater Fair Hearing” dated October 19, 1976. (b) A statement of the respect in which "the method of recoupment is modified” in the next paragraph of said decision of October 19, 1976, including, particularly, a statement of the amount and the rate of recoupment ordered by the local agency and the respect in which the State agency has modified it. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Silverman, Evans, Lane and Sandler, JJ.
### §505. Sale of duplicate plates

The Director of the Government Publishing Office shall sell, under regulations of the Joint Committee on Printing to persons who may apply, additional or duplicate stereotype or electrotype plates from which a Government publication is printed, at a price not to exceed the cost of composition, the metal, and making to the Government, plus 10 per centum, and the full amount of the price shall be paid when the order is filed.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1244; Pub. L. 94–553, §105(a)(1), Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2599; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c)(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §58 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §52, 28 Stat. 608).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer".

1976—Pub. L. 94–553 struck out provision that a publication could not be copyrighted if it was reprinted from additional or duplicate plates purchased from the Government from which Government publications had been printed or if it was reprinted from other Government publications.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1976 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 94–553 effective Jan. 1, 1978, see section 102 of Pub. L. 94–553, set out as an Effective Date note preceding section 101 of Title 17, Copyrights.