alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 30

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans who survived 

the Bataan Death March and were held as prisoners of war by the Japanese. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. MICA (for himself, Mr. SIMMONS, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To provide compensation for certain World War II veterans 

who survived the Bataan Death March and were held 

as prisoners of war by the Japanese.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Samuel B. Moody Ba5 taan Death March Compensation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PAYMENT TO WORLD WAR II VETERANS WHO SUR7 VIVED BATAAN DEATH MARCH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the military de9 partment concerned shall pay, upon request, to an indi-
2

•HR 30 IH 

1 vidual described in subsection (b) the amount determined 

2 with respect to that individual under subsection (c). 

3 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—A payment under sub4 section (a) shall be made to any individual who as a mem5 ber of the Armed Forces during World War II—

6 (1) was captured on the peninsula of Bataan or 

7 island of Corregidor in the territory of the Phil8 ippines by Japanese forces; and 

9 (2) participated in and survived the Bataan 

10 Death March. 

11 (c) AMOUNT TO BE PAID.—The amount of a pay12 ment under subsection (a) to an individual shall be $4 for 

13 each day during which the individual was held in captivity 

14 by Japanese forces during World War II, compounded an15 nually at a 3 percent annual rate of interest. 

16 (d) PAYMENT TO SURVIVING SPOUSE.—In the case 

17 of an individual described in subsection (b) who is de18 ceased and who has an unremarried surviving spouse, pay19 ment under this section with respect to that individual 

20 shall be made to the unremarried surviving spouse. If 

21 there is no unremarried surviving spouse, no payment 

22 shall be made under this section with respect to that indi23 vidual.

Æ
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

Submitted January 20, 2011

Decided January 20, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge

No.  10‐1872

MICHAEL MUEHL,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

BELINDA SCHRUBBE, et al.,

Defendants‐Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Western District of

Wisconsin.

No. 09‐cv‐16‐bbc

Barbara B. Crabb,

Judge.

O R D E R

Wisconsin state prisoner Michael Muehl appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion for appointment of counsel during his unsuccessful lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

in which he claimed that prison nurse Gail Waltz and other defendants violated his Eighth

Amendment rights by denying him adequate medical care.  We affirm.

Muehl was imprisoned at Waupun Correctional Institution on December 12, 2007,

when he cut his left wrist in a suicide attempt.  Dr. Paul Sumnicht treated and closed the

wound, but it opened again that night.  Muehl alleged that Waltz—who observed him on

December 13—refused to treat his wound.  His complaint, which named 12 defendants and

covered several alleged incidents of inadequate medical care, was severed into three cases,

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 10‐1872 Page 2

and in this case only his claim against Waltz survived summary judgment.  Muehl

subsequently moved for appointment of counsel, but the district court denied his motion.

After Muehl, proceeding pro se, presented his case at trial, the district court granted

Waltz judgment as a matter of law.  Testimony at trial from Sumnicht and Waltz established

that the wound was only superficial, and thus the court concluded that even if Waltz

ignored the reopened wound on December 13, Muehl had not shown that he had a serious

medical need as required for his Eighth Amendment claim.

Muehl argues on appeal that the district court should have appointed counsel to

represent him at trial; counsel, he contends, would have found an expert to assess his

treatment in a way that would have led to a different outcome.  A court weighing a motion

to appoint counsel must consider whether the difficulty of the case exceeds the plaintiff’s

capacity to litigate his claims and present his case coherently.  See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d

647, 654‐55 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc).  Muehl argued in his motion that he did not know how

to prepare for a jury trial, that he was not as qualified as a “seasoned litigator” to cross‐

examine witnesses, and that he needed counsel to procure expert testimony to counter

Waltz’s experts.  But the district court properly applied Pruitt and denied his request,

explaining that the case was not complex, that Muehl appeared capable of litigating it (his

filings had “generally been reasoned and easy to understand”), and that all pro se litigants

are similarly handicapped by a lack of legal expertise and trial experience.  See Pruitt, 503

F.3d at 655‐56; Johnson v. Doughty, 433 F.3d 1001, 1006 (7th Cir. 2006).

We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
#### A. Plamondon Mfg. Company, appellee, v. American Die Moulded Castings Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,154.

Assumpsit for balance claimed for castings specially made, sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Hosea W. Wells, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 31, 1923.

Eisendrath & Solomon, for appellant. Ryan, Condon & Livingston, for appellee; Walter E. Beebe and David J. Greenberg, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §36d. Cooperative agreements

Notwithstanding the provisions of the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977 (31 U.S.C. 6301–6308), the United States Geological Survey is authorized to continue existing, and on and after November 10, 2003, to enter into new cooperative agreements directed towards a particular cooperator, in support of joint research and data collection activities with Federal, State, and academic partners funded by appropriations herein, including those that provide for space in cooperator facilities.

(Pub. L. 108–108, title I, Nov. 10, 2003, 117 Stat. 1254.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–224, Feb. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 3, which was classified generally to chapter 8 (§501 et seq.) of former Title 41, Public Contracts, and was repealed and reenacted as chapter 63 (§6301 et seq.) of Title 31, Money and Finance, by Pub. L. 97–258, §§1, 5(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877, 1068.

Appropriations herein, referred to in text, probably means appropriations under the headings "United States Geological Survey", "surveys, investigations, and research" and "administrative provisions", of the annual Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following appropriation act:

Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title I, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 228.
### §411a. Repealed. Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 374, §2, 45 Stat. 1406

Section, act June 28, 1926, ch. 704, 44 Stat. 776, authorized employment of engineers for consultation.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Merrill A. Miller, Jr., Chairman, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.The certification is given to the knowledge of the undersigned.     *By:  **/s/ Merrill A. Miller, Jr.*    Name:  Merrill A. Miller, Jr.    Title:  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer   Date:  May 9, 2008
#### § 203.602 Delinquency notice to mortgagor.

The mortgagee shall give notice to each mortgagor in default on a form supplied by the Secretary or, if the mortgagee wishes to use its own form, on a form approved by the Secretary, no later than the end of the second month of any delinquency in payments under the mortgage. If an account is reinstated and again becomes delinquent, the delinquency notice shall be sent to the mortgagor again, except that the mortgagee is not required to send a second delinquency notice to the same mortgagor more often than once each six months. The mortgagee may issue additional or more frequent notices of delinquency at its option.
Exhibit 21.1

List of significant subsidiaries (as defined in Regulation S-X, Rule 1-02) of JER Investors Trust Inc.



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1 Depositor, LLC
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, Limited
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2005-1, LLC
| | - |  | -----------------------



| |  |  | JER Investors Trust Finance Company GS, LLC
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2 Depositor, LLC
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2, Limited
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | JER CRE CDO 2006-2, LLC
| | - |  | -----------------------
Exhibit 99.1


                            ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For IBM Corporation Securities,
Series 2004-7 (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
            of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
            respect of the Trust during the 2006 calendar year;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
            whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
            agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge,
            except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
            fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar
            standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
            accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
            Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
            procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is included in
            these reports.

Date: March 30, 2007

By:    /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
     ------------------------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2977

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Brockway, Montana, as the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post al Service located at 306 2nd Avenue in 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2977

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, as 

the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 2977 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, shall be 

4 known and designated as the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office 

5 Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2005. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137422 

TIMOTHY A. CHEESEBORO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137422 

 COA: 284985 

WCAC: 07-000239 

KOEGEL MEATS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 25, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
§ 206.43 Information to borrower. ( a ) *Disclosure of costs of obtaining mortgage.* The mortgagee shall ensure that the borrower has received full disclosure of all costs of obtaining the mortgage. The mortgagee shall ask the borrower about any costs or other obligations that the borrower has incurred to obtain the mortgage, as defined by the Commissioner, in addition to providing any disclosures required by law. The mortgagee shall clearly state to the borrower which charges are required to obtain the mortgage and which are not required to obtain the mortgage.
( b ) *Lump sum disbursement.* ( 1 ) If the borrower requests that at least 25 percent of the principal limit amount (after deducting amounts excluded in the following sentence) be disbursed at closing to the borrower (or as otherwise permitted by § 206.25), the mortgagee must make sufficient inquiry at closing to confirm that the borrower will not use any part of the amount disbursed for payments to or on behalf of an estate planning service firm, with an explanation of § 206.32 as necessary or appropriate.
( 2 ) This paragraph does not apply to any part of the principal limit used for the following: ( i ) Initial MIP under § 206.105(a) or fees and charges allowed under § 206.31(a) paid by the mortgagee from mortgage proceeds instead of by the borrower in cash; and
( ii ) Amounts set aside in accordance with § 206.19(f) for repairs under § 206.47, for property charges under § 206.205, or for servicing charges under § 206.207(b).
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

               Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                             Sept 28,          Sept 29,          Sept 28,          Sept 29,
                                               1997              1996              1997              1996
                                         --------------    --------------    --------------    ---------------
<S>                                      <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Primary earnings per share
 
Average shares outstanding                        5,031             2,047             5,031              2,047
 
Weighted average number of common
   shares issued in connection with stock
   offerings                                        544                 -               180                  -
 
Adjustment to reflect shares issued to
   consider S corporation
   distributions                                      -                55                20                 45
Shares issuable upon the exercise of
   outstanding stock options and
   warrant                                          121                 -               121                  -
                                         --------------    --------------    --------------    ---------------
Total                                             5,696             2,102             5,352              2,092
                                         ==============    ==============    ==============    ===============
 
Net income                                       $  955
                                         ==============
Net income per share                              $0.17
                                         ==============
 
Pro forma net income                                               $  323            $2,642             $  877
                                                           ==============    ==============    ===============
 
Pro forma net income per share                                     $ 0.15             $0.49             $ 0.42
                                                           ==============    ==============    ===============
</TABLE>

Fully diluted earnings per Common Share and primary earnings per Common Share
are the same for the three and nine months ended September 28, 1997.
### §982. Grant to States to aid in construction of levees and drains

To enable the several States (but not including the States of Kansas, Nebraska, and Nevada) to construct the necessary levees and drains, to reclaim the swamp and overflowed lands therein—the whole of the swamp and overflowed lands, made unfit thereby for cultivation, and remaining unsold on or after the 28th day of September, A.D. 1850, are granted and belong to the several States respectively, in which said lands are situated: Provided, however, That said grant of swamp and overflowed lands, as to the States of California, Minnesota, and Oregon, is subject to the limitations, restrictions and conditions hereinafter named and specified in this chapter, as applicable to said three last-named States respectively.

(R.S. §2479.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2479 derived from acts Sept. 28, 1850, ch. 84, §§1, 4, 9 Stat. 520; Mar. 12, 1860, ch. 5, §1, 12 Stat. 3; Feb. 19, 1874, ch. 30, 18 Stat. 16.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Grants Not To Extend to Alaska

Land grant under Alaska Statehood provisions in lieu of grant of land under this section (declared not to extend to Alaska), see section 6(l) of Pub. L. 85–508, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
§ 3280.303 General requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75748 , Sept. 16, 2024.
( a ) *Minimum requirements.* The design and construction of a manufactured home shall conform with the provisions of this standard. Requirements for any size, weight, or quality of material modified by the terms of *minimum, not less than, at least,* and similar expressions are minimum standards. The manufacturer or installer may exceed these standards provided such deviation does not result in any inferior installation or defeat the purpose and intent of this standard.
( b ) *Construction.* All construction methods shall be in conformance with accepted engineering practices to insure durable, livable, and safe housing and shall demonstrate acceptable workmanship reflecting journeyman quality of work of the various trades.
( c ) *Structural analysis.* The strength and rigidity of the component parts and/or the integrated structure shall be determined by engineering analysis or by suitable load tests to simulate the actual loads and conditions of application that occur. (See subparts E and J.)
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *New materials and methods.* ( 1 ) Any new material or method of construction not provided for in this standard and any material or method of questioned suitability proposed for use in the manufacture of the structure shall nevertheless conform in performance to the requirements of this standard.
( 2 ) Unless based on accepted engineering design for the use indicated, all new manufactured home materials, equipment, systems or methods of construction not provided for in this standard shall be subjected to the tests specified in paragraph (g) of this section.
( f ) *Allowable design stress.* The design stresses of all materials shall conform to accepted engineering practice. The use of materials not certified as to strength or stress grade shall be limited to the minimum allowable stresses under accepted engineering practice.
( g ) *Alternative test procedures.* In the absence of recognized testing procedures either in the Standards in this part or in the applicable provisions of those standards incorporated in this part by reference, the manufacturer electing this option must develop or cause to be developed testing procedures to demonstrate the structural properties and significant characteristics of the material, assembly, subassembly component, or member, except for testing methods involving one-piece metal roofing as would be required in § 3280.305(c)(1)(iii). Such testing procedures become part of the manufacturer's approved design. Such tests must be witnessed by an independent licensed professional engineer or architect or by a recognized testing organization. Copies of the test results must be kept on file by the manufactured home manufacturer.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 58 FR 55005, Oct. 25, 1993; 59 FR 2469, Jan. 14, 1994; 70 FR 72043, Nov. 30, 2005]