alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Ground-water-quality data for a treated-wastewater plume undergoing natural restoration, Ashumet Valley, Cape Cod, Massachusetts

By: Jennifer G. SavoieRichard L. Smith**Douglas B. Kent**Kathryn M. HessDenis R. LeBlanc**Larry B. Barber**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds198

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
### §315q. Withdrawal of lands for war or national defense purposes; payment for cancellation of permits or licenses

Whenever use for war or national defense purposes of the public domain or other property owned by or under the control of the United States prevents its use for grazing, persons holding grazing permits or licenses and persons whose grazing permits or licenses have been or will be canceled because of such use shall be paid out of the funds appropriated or allocated for such project such amounts as the head of the department or agency so using the lands shall determine to be fair and reasonable for the losses suffered by such persons as a result of the use of such lands for war or national defense purposes. Such payments shall be deemed payment in full for such losses. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to create any liability not now existing against the United States.

(July 9, 1942, ch. 500, 56 Stat. 654; May 28, 1948, ch. 353, §1, 62 Stat. 277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of act June 28, 1934, known as the Taylor Grazing Act, which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1948—Act May 28, 1948, inserted "or national defense" between "war" and "purposes" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Act May 28, 1948, ch. 353, §2, 62 Stat. 277, provided that: "This amendment [amending this section] is to take effect as of July 25, 1947."

#### Termination of War and Emergencies

Joint Res. July 25, 1947, ch. 327, §3, 61 Stat. 451, provided that in the interpretation of this section, the date July 25, 1947, shall be deemed to be the date of termination of any state of war theretofore declared by Congress and of the national emergencies proclaimed by the President on September 8, 1939, and May 27, 1941.
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3071

AN ACT

To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, Deputy Executive Directors, and General Counsel 

of the Office of Compliance to serve one additional term.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 3071 EH 

1 SECTION 1. PERMITTING CURRENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, 

2 DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS, AND GEN3 ERAL COUNSEL OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE 

4 TO SERVE ONE ADDITIONAL TERM. 

5 (a) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.—Notwithstanding sec6 tion 302(a)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 

7 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)), the individual serving as Ex8 ecutive Director of the Office of Compliance as of the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act may serve one additional 

10 term. 

11 (b) DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS.—Notwith12 standing section 302(b)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

13 1382(b)(2)), any individual serving as a Deputy Executive 

14 Director of the Office of Compliance as of the date of the 

15 enactment of this Act may serve one additional term. 

16 (c) GENERAL COUNSEL.—Notwithstanding section 

17 302(c)(5) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(c)(5)), the indi18 vidual serving as General Counsel of the Office of Compli19 ance as of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve 

20 one additional term.

Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2005. 

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3071

AN ACT

To permit the individuals currently serving as Exto serve one additional term. and General Counsel of the Office of Compliance ecutive Director, Deputy Executive Directors,
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0379 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-26-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
### §422c. Proposals; submission; payment for cost of examination

Any organization desiring to avail itself of the benefits provided in this subchapter shall submit a proposal therefor to the Secretary in such form and manner as he shall prescribe. Each such proposal shall be accompanied by a payment of $5,000 to defray, in part, the cost of examining the proposal.

(Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, §3, 70 Stat. 1044; Pub. L. 99–546, title III, §303, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3053.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–546 substituted "$5,000" for "$1,000".
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE

JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE

ANNETTE JACKSON, 

Plaintiffs,

 v.

G. LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of

the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge

# 275), C. SMITH, individually and as an officer of

the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge #

285), P. DUMPA, individually and as an officer of

the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Bade #

291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually

and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police

Department (Badge # 274), 

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01016 WHA

ORDER GRANTING

RULE 50 MOTION

IN PART

All claims by plaintiff Shawna Martin and/or against Officer Spires are DISMISSED under

Rule 50 for insufficient evidence. The identification evidence is too weak or nonexistent and the

exceedingly minor bruise was too minor to rise to the level of a constitutional violation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 21, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 193 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 1
### §§1071 to 1073. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(114), 65 Stat. 706

Section 1071, act July 5, 1884, ch. 214, §1, 23 Stat. 103, provided for designation by President of abandoned military reservations for disposition by Secretary of the Interior.

Section 1072, act July 5, 1884, ch. 214, §2, 23 Stat. 103, related to survey or subdivision of those lands and appraisal, advertisement and sale and rights of settlers.

Section 1073, act July 5, 1884, ch. 214, §3, 23 Stat. 103, related to sale of improvements or other property on those reservations.
### §1315. Fish and Wildlife Service: bulletins

In addition to the usual number of the bulletins of the Fish and Wildlife Service, five thousand copies shall be printed: one thousand for the Senate, two thousand for the House of Representatives, and two thousand for distribution by the Service.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1268.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §258 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 614; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. III, §3, eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2108, 54 Stat. 1232).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Fish and Wildlife Service, created by Reorg. Plan No. III of 1940, §3, eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2107, 54 Stat. 1231, succeeded by United States Fish and Wildlife Service established by act Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1036, §3, 70 Stat. 1119. See section 742b of Title 16, Conservation.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RYAN J. SIMMONS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-3871 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 15, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Susan B. Maulucci, Judge.

Ryan J. Simmons, pro se.

LaROSE, Chief Judge.

Ryan J. Simmons, pro se, appeals the postconviction court's ord er

summarily denying his motion for return of property. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2);

Bolden v. State, 875 So. 2d 780, 782 n.3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). T he postconviction court

denied the motion as untimely but failed to attach the judgment and sentence. We

reverse and remand for the postconviction court to attach porti ons of the record that

conclusively refute Mr. Simmons' claim or hold an evidentiary h earing on the matter.- 2 - See Almeda v. State, 959 So. 2d 806, 809 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("[ I]f the circuit court

deemed the motion's allegations to be facially sufficient, the circuit court should have

either attached portions of the record that conclusively refute d Mr. Almeda's claim or

held an evidentiary hearing."); Stevens v. State, 929 So. 2d 11 97, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA

2006).

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
§ 401.309 PRA term and termination provisions; other provisions. ( a ) *1-year term with renewals.* The PRA will have a term of 1 year, to be renewed for successive terms of 1 year with the mutual agreement of both parties. The PRA will provide for HUD to pay final compensation to the PAE and to assign responsibility for continuing activities if the PRA is not renewed.
( b ) *Termination for cause or convenience of Federal Government* — ( 1 ) *Termination for cause.* HUD may terminate a PRA at any time for cause, with payment required by HUD as provided in the PRA only for matters authorized by the PRA and performed by the PAE to the date of termination. HUD will retain the right of set-off against any payments due as well as such other rights afforded at law and in equity.
( 2 ) *Termination for convenience of Federal Government.* HUD may terminate a PRA, and may remove an eligible property from a PRA, at any time in accordance with the PRA or applicable law, regardless of whether the PAE is in default of any of its obligations under the PRA, if such termination is in the best interests of the Federal Government. The PRA will provide for payment to the PAE of a specified percentage of the base fee authorized by § 401.304(a) and amounts for reimbursement of third-party vendors to the PAE authorized by § 401.304(c).
( 3 ) *Transfer to another PAE; temporary waiver of rights.* If a PRA is terminated: ( i ) HUD may order an immediate transfer of some or all of the PAE's duties to another PAE designated by HUD; and
( ii ) HUD may temporarily waive its right of immediate termination in order to allow an orderly transfer of duties and responsibilities under a PRA, without waiving the right of termination after the transfer has been completed to HUD's satisfaction.
( c ) *Liability for damages.* During the term of a PRA, and notwithstanding any termination of a PRA, HUD may seek its actual, direct, and consequential damages from any PAE for failure to comply with its obligations under PRA.
( d ) *Cumulative remedies.* The remedies under this section are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies or rights HUD may have under the terms of the PRA, at law, or otherwise.
[65 FR 15485, Mar. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 66038, Nov. 26, 2007]
Exhibit 13.2

906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jesse Liu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has
not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: June 15, 2007    
|                       
|/s/ Jesse Liu          
|Jesse Liu              
|Chief Financial Officer
§ 26.2 Hearing officer, powers, and duties. ( a ) *Hearing officer.* Proceedings conducted under these rules shall be presided over by a hearing officer who shall be an Administrative Law Judge or Administrative Judge authorized by the Secretary or designee to conduct proceedings under this part.
( b ) *Time and place of hearing.* The hearing officer shall set the time and place of any hearing and shall give reasonable notice to the parties.
( c ) *Powers of hearing officers.* The hearing officer shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing and take all action necessary to avoid delay in the disposition of proceedings and to maintain order. The hearing officer shall have all powers necessary to those ends, including, but not limited to, the power: ( 1 ) To administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) To cause subpoenas to be issued as authorized by law;
( 3 ) To rule upon offers of proof and receive evidence;
( 4 ) To order or limit discovery as the interests of justice may require;
( 5 ) To regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of the parties and their counsel;
( 6 ) To hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
( 7 ) To consider and rule upon all procedural and other motions appropriate in adjudicative proceedings;
( 8 ) To take notice of any material fact not appearing in evidence in the record that is properly a matter of judicial notice;
( 9 ) To make and file determinations; and
( 10 ) To exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the hearing officer under subpart A of this part.
[73 FR 76833, Dec. 17, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Onita Tuggles v. City of Antioch et al.

Case No. C 08-01914 JCS

1 STIP & ORDER NO. 2: DEFENDANT 

BITTNER ACTED UNDER COLOR OF LAW

Jivaka Candappa (SBN 225919)

LAW OFFICE OF JIVAKA CANDAPPA

180 Grand Avenue, Suite 700

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 628-0300

Facsimile: (510) 628-0400

Attorney for Plaintiff

ONITA TUGGLES

James V. Fitzgerald, III (SBN 55632)

Petra Bruggisser (SBN 241173)

MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, 

SLATTERY, PFALZER, BORGES & 

BROTHERS LLP

1211 Newell Avenue

Walnut Creek, California 94596

Telephone: (925) 939-5330

Facsimile: (925) 939-0203

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF ANTIOCH and OFFICER 

DESMOND BITTNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ONITA TUGGLES,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CITY OF ANTIOCH, and OFFICER 

DESMOND BITTNER, in his individual and 

official capacities,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C 08-01914 JCS

DEFENDANT DESMOND BITTNER 

ACTED UNDER COLOR OF LAW

STIPULATION AND ORDER NO. 2:

Trial Date: August 30, 2010

Judge: Hon. Joseph C. Spero

 Ctrm A, 15th Floor

All parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Antioch Police 

Department Officer, Defendant Desmond Bittner, acted under color of law at all relevant 

Case 3:08-cv-01914-JCS Document 158 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Onita Tuggles v. City of Antioch et al.

Case No. C 08-01914 JCS

2 STIP & ORDER NO. 2: DEFENDANT 

BITTNER ACTED UNDER COLOR OF LAW

times identified in this lawsuit. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: July 26, 2010 By: /s/ Jivaka Candappa 

_________________________________

JIVAKA CANDAPPA

Attorney for Plaintiff

ONITA TUGGLES

DATED: July 26, 2010 MCNAMARA, DODGE, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,

PFALZER, BORGES, & BROTHERS LLP

 /s/ James Fitzgerald, III

By: _____________________________

JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III

PETRA BRUGGISSER

Attorneys for Defendants

CITY OF ANTIOCH and 

OFFICER DESMOND BITTNER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ________________________

_______________________________________

HON. JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate

08/05/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-01914-JCS Document 158 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 2
### §1575. Contract authority

The Secretary is authorized to enter into contracts that he deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter in advance of the appropriation of funds therefor.

(Pub. L. 93–320, title I, §105, June 24, 1974, 88 Stat. 270.)
### §435. Entries in excess of farm unit

All entries under reclamation projects containing more than one farm unit shall be reduced in area and conformed to a single farm unit within two years after making proof of residence, improvement, and cultivation, or within two years after the issuance of a farm-unit plat for the project, if the same issues subsequent to the making of such proof: Provided, That such proof is made within four years from the date as announced by the Secretary of the Interior that water is available for delivery for the land. Any entryman failing within the period herein provided to dispose of the excess of his entry above one farm unit, in the manner provided by law, and to conform his entry to a single farm unit shall render his entry subject to cancellation as to the excess above one farm unit: Provided, That upon compliance with the provisions of law such entryman shall be entitled to receive a patent for that part of his entry which conforms to one farm unit as established for the project.

(Aug. 13, 1914, ch. 247, §13, 38 Stat. 690.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2892 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2892

    To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to remove the 
limitation on the number of reverse mortgages that may be insured under 
         the FHA mortgage insurance program for such mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

Mr. Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Matheson, Mrs. Kelly, 
Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Ms. Ginny 
 Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Price of North Carolina, and 
 Ms. Harris) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend section 255 of the National Housing Act to remove the 
limitation on the number of reverse mortgages that may be insured under 
         the FHA mortgage insurance program for such mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reverse Mortgages to Help America's 
Seniors Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CAP ON NUMBER OF MORTGAGES INSURED.

    Section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-20) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (g), by striking the first sentence; and
            (2) in subsection (i)(1)(C), by striking ``limitations'' 
        and inserting ``limitation''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 3282

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

#### § 3282.503 Determinations and hearings.

The Secretary shall make all the determinations and hold such hearings as are required by these regulations, and the Secretary shall resolve all disputes arising under these regulations.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Daves of America, Inc. for the
quarter ended September 28, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Famous Daves of America, Inc.
 Dated: November 7, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Christopher ODonnellChristopher ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: November 7, 2008
    
    
    
    /s/ Diana Garvis PurcelDiana Garvis PurcelChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)