alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3021 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 3021

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2005

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
      program through September 30, 2005, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TANF Extension Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES BLOCK 
              GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2005.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 of such 
Act, shall continue through September 30, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2004, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) 
of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 
not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made 
pursuant to this authority through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 
2005 at the level provided for such activities through the fourth 
quarter of fiscal year 2004.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ``June 
30'' and inserting ``September 30''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE 
              AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 
              2005.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through September 30, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2004, and out of any money in the Treasury 
of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority through the fourth 
quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level provided for such activities 
through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 29, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50355

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDC Nos. P-95-CV-62, P-92-CR-74-1

 

July 24, 1998

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Cesar Hernandez-Rodriguez, federal prisoner #55916-080,

appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or

correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He contends

that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a

Batson claim. He also argues, for the first time on appeal, that
2

the district court erred in omitting to grant him a downward

departure for his post-offense rehabilitative efforts and for being

a deportable alien. Finally, he contends, also for the first time

on appeal, that he qualifies for the “safety valve” provision of

U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.

Hernandez’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is

unavailing because he has failed to demonstrate any prejudice as a

result of his counsel’s omission. See Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). As for his other claims, a thorough

review of the record reveals no reversible error. See United

States v. Cervantes, 132 F.3d 1106, 1109 (5th Cir. 1998); United

States v. Flores-Ochoa, 139 F.3d 1022, 1023 (5th Cir. 1998),

petition for cert. filed, (May 22, 1998) (No. 98-9199). And, as to

these claims, even if it were appropriate to follow Flores-Ochoa

rather than Cervantes, and even if there were plain error, which

there is not, there is nothing which seriously affects the

fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the proceedings, and

this Court would not exercise its discretion to “correct” any of

the forfeited purported errors. United States v. Olano, 507 U.S.

725, 735-36 (1993).

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Famous Dave's of America,
Inc. does hereby certify that:

    a.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Dave's of America, Inc. for
        the quarter ended June 29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934: and

    b.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Famous
        Dave's of America, Inc.


Dated:  August 8, 2003                                  /s/ Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
### §597c. Reservation of Indians' right to use lands

The easements granted in section 597a of this title shall not interfere with the use by the Indians of the Wind River or Shoshone Indian Reservation of the lands dealt with in sections 597a to 597d of this title and the waters of Bull Lake Creek and the reservoir insofar as the use by the Indians shall not be inconsistent with the use of said lands for reservoir purposes.

(Mar. 14, 1940, ch. 51, §3, 54 Stat. 49.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3216 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3216

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benfluralin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2005

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benfluralin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENFLURALIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.59 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to N-Butyl-N-ethyl-a,a,a-
trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine) is amended by striking ``12/31/
2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1393

MELANIE WRIGHT, Administratix, Successor in Interest, Record 

Property Owner, Personal Representative, for the Estate of 

Earl Wright,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

EARL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; GMAC MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION; JOHN E. DRISCOLL, III, Esquire; ROBERT E. 

FRAZIER, Esquire; JANA M. GANTT, Esquire; LAURA D. HARRIS, 

Esquire; DANIEL J. PESACHOWITZ, Esquire; DEENA L. REYNOLDS, 

Esquire; STANLEY ZIMMERMAN, Esquire; KIMBERLY BROOKE LANE, 

Esquire; BEHZAD GOHARI; SAMUEL I. WHITE, Esquire; RICHARD S. 

O’CONNOR, Esquire; ROBERT HARVEY HILLMAN, Esquire; CRAIG 

ROBERT HAUGHTON, Esquire; FEDERAL TITLE AND ESCROW COMPANY; 

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER; JOE GENTILE; EDUARDA SANTIAGO,

Defendants – Appellees,

BALTIMORE HOME ALLIANCE, LLC,

Debtor – Appellee,

and

NICK GREEN; JESSICA MITCHELL; BANK OF AMERICA; JOHN AND JANE 

DOES, I through XV; MD SANT, LLC,

Defendants.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. 

(8:14-cv-03991-PJM)

Submitted: January 24, 2017 Decided: January 31, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melanie Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Robert Haughton, 

MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Robert Harvey Hillman, SAMUEL 

I. WHITE PC, Rockville, Maryland; Behzad Gohari, GOHARI LAW FIRM 

LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Ziad Paul Haddad, David Christopher 

Tobin, TOBIN, O’CONNOR & EWING, Washington, D.C.; Neil R. White, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland; Mark 

William Schweitzer, MCNAMEE, HOSEA, JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & LYNCH 

PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Melanie Wright appeals the district court’s order dismissing 

her complaint with prejudice for failing to state a claim. Wright 

sought to challenge a state-administered foreclosure proceeding

after defaulting on a mortgage that her father initially held on 

the contested property and later transferred to her. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. 

Nationstar Mortg., LLC, No. 8:14-cv-03991-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 18, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30594

**Shelby Bailey,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus
**Kyle France, In His Official Capacity as Chief Executive of the Board of Commissioners of the**  **Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District,**

Defendant

— Appellee

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2 :18

- CV

- 5888

Before **Owen,** Chief Judge , and **Smith** and **Graves** , Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
This is an appeal of the district court’s dismissal of Shelby Bailey’s
action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 asserting that he was not provided program access

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 13, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30594 Document: 00515935238 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2021No. 20

- 30594

2 for New Orleans Saints games at the Superdome

. See 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et

seq.; see also 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq. This court has considered the appeal on the basis of the briefs, the record and the applicable authority. Having done so, the judgment is **A FFIRMED**  , essentially for the reasons stated in the
district court’ s very thorough , well

- reasoned Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Reasons for Judgment. Case: 20-30594 Document: 00515935238 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2021
§ 3280.902 Definitions. ( a ) *Chassis* means the entire transportation system comprising the following subsystems: drawbar and coupling mechanism, frame, running gear assembly, and lights.
( b ) *Drawbar and coupling mechanism* means the rigid assembly, (usually a rigid substructure) upon which is mounted a coupling mechanism, which connects the manufactured home's frame to the towing vehicle.
( c ) *Frame* means the fabricated rigid substructure which provides considerable support to the affixed manufactured home structure both during transport and on-site; and also provides a platform for securement of the running gear assembly, the drawbar and coupling mechanism.
( d ) *Running gear assembly* means the subsystem consisting of suspension springs, axles, bearings, wheels, hubs, tires, and brakes, with their related hardware.
( e ) *Lights* means those safety lights and associated wiring required by applicable U.S. Department of Transportation regulations.
( f ) *Transportation system,* (Same as chassis, above).
( g ) *Highway,* includes all roads and streets to be legally used in transporting the manufactured home.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 28093, June 29, 1982; 86 FR 2523, Jan. 12, 2021]
#### William F. Kelly, trading as W. F. Kelly Teaming Company, appellee, v. Commonwealth Edison Company et al., on appeal of Beaver Electric Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,786.

Award having been made by the industrial commission against the employer of a deceased, said employer brings suit for damages under first paragraph of section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act against appellant. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo Pam, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 31, 1923.

(filarles A. Scott and Wiley W. Mills, for appellant. Alfred Roy Hulbert, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00080

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.J.M. and A.R.P., Children

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 00429

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of this appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED May 30, 2018

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
### §1340. Director of the Government Publishing Office: annual report

In addition to the usual number of the annual report of the Director of the Government Publishing Office, one thousand copies shall be printed to be distributed under his direction.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1272; Pub. L. 113–235, div. H, title I, §1301(c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2537.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §288 (Jan. 12, 1895, ch. 23, §73, 28 Stat. 618).

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Pub. L. 113–235 substituted "Director of the Government Publishing Office" for "Public Printer" in section catchline and text.
#### § 26.33 Ex parte communications.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) shall communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
JEF

P McRKLE Y . DcPA R IMEN T O F (^R-:MC \ 

## ^ANSPORIATIO N ^^-l^^^i^l^ "

/XKE T OPERATION S



# durate s fc>cnate • UKALIII . nUUL-MlON . LAEO?. . A\' D PENSION' S L<J J UL T - I A !0iv^|^!GTO^^ . DC20SI 0 BANKIWG.IIOU5I\'G . AH[ > UKHA;- ; AFi-AIH S Augus t 23 , 201 0 Ra y LaHood , Secretary U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra mGrant : DOT-OST-2010-0124 . Dea r Secretary LaHood : I a mwritin g t o reques t

ful l an dfair consideratio n fo

r th e Eugen e Airport' s applicatio n fo r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Progra mGrant . Th e Eugen e Airpor

t (EUG ) plan s t o us e thi s gran t t o develo p ane w servic e rout e betwee n Eugene. . Orego n an dSa

n Jose , California . Thi s ne w rout e woul dhel p th e airport recaptur e marke t share , promot e tourism , an dcreat e economi c developmen t opportunitie s for

both cities . Accordin g t o th e Eugen e Airport' s ai r servic e developmen t

consultants , 8 5 percen t

o f are a traveler s destine dfo

r San Jos e op t

t o driv e to th e PorthmdAirport (PDX ) to fl

y non-stop , rathe r than fl y ou t o f Eugen e an dthe n connec t i n anothe r

city . Thi s gran t

woul dhel p t o lowe r

th e relativel y hig h ai r

fare s for flight s leavin g th e Eugen e Airport , an dhel p b y creatin g greate r competitio n with carrier s flyiiig ou t o f Portland . Th e Eugen e Airport

ha s receive dsuppor t

fo r thi s projec t

fromth e loca l communit y includin g th e Eugen e Are aChambe r

o f Commerce , Springfiel dChambe r o f Commerce , Trave l Lan e County , an dLan e Metr o Partnership . Than k yo u fo r you r ful l an dfai r revie w o f

th e Eugen e Airport' s gran t application . Shoul dyo u hav e an y further questions , pleas e contac t Dan Whelan i

n m y Eugen e offic e a

t 541-465-6750 .

Sincerely,

Jef f Merkle y Unite dState s Senato r

10 7 Hussexi . Sst-i.-'T

ROFrici ] BuiujUK

i 12 1 S.W . SALMO N SNJnt r \'\V.SiiiMr,iow . D

C 2051 0 Pc.RTLA;;n . O R9720' ! (?02 1 32'J-375 3 (503 ) 326-338 5 FA X (20.? ) 2.?8-399 7 FAX (503 ) 326-290 0
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 The government attempted to reach the U.S. Probation Officer by phone, but his voice 1

mail message indicates he is out of the office until March 29, 2010. 

ORDER RESCHEDULING SENTENCING

CR 09-1160 VRW

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

BRIAN C. LEWIS (DCBN 476851)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: brian.lewis@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ABRAHAM ISMAEL ALMANZABECERRA,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-1160 VRW

[PROPOSED] ORDER

RESCHEDULING SENTENCING

FROM APRIL 29, 2010 TO MAY 13,

2010

On January 21, 2010, the parties appeared before the Honorable Charles R. Breyer, and

the defendant pled guilty to the captioned indictment. At that time, sentencing was set for

April 29, 2010. However, government counsel has recently learned that he will be traveling out

of state and unavailable on that date. As such, with the agreement of counsel for both parties and

the defendant, the Court now finds as follows: 1

The parties agree to reschedule the sentencing set in this case to Thursday, May 13, 2010

//

//

Case 3:09-cr-01160-VRW Document 13 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER RESCHEDULING SENTENCING

CR 09-1160 VRW -2-

 at 2:00 p.m. The previous sentencing date is vacated.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: March 26, 2010 /s/ 

JODI LINKER

Counsel for Abraham Ismael Almanza-Becerra

DATED: March 26, 2010 /s/ 

BRIAN C. LEWIS

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ___________ ___________________________

VAUGHN R. WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Northern District of California

March 30, 2010 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cr-01160-VRW Document 13 Filed 03/30/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 3286.809 Withdrawal of qualifying installation program status. ( a ) *Voluntary withdrawal.* Any state that intends to withdraw from its responsibilities to administer a qualifying installation program should provide the Secretary with a minimum of 90 days notice.
( b ) *Involuntary withdrawal.* Whenever the Secretary finds, after affording notice and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with subpart D of part 3282 of this chapter, that a state installation program fails to comply substantially with any provision of the installation program requirements or that the state program has become inadequate, the Secretary will notify the state of withdrawal of acceptance or conditional acceptance of the state installation program. The HUD-administered installation program will begin to operate in such state at such time as the Secretary establishes in issuing the finding.
### §1473. Acceptance of contributions from private and public sources by Mineral Management Service

In fiscal year 1987 and thereafter, the Minerals Management Service is authorized to accept land, buildings, equipment and other contributions, from public and private sources, which shall be available for the purposes provided for in this account, including, in fiscal years 2010 through 2013, contributions of money and services to conduct work in support of the orderly exploration and development of Outer Continental Shelf resources, including but not limited to, preparation of environmental documents such as impact statements and assessments, studies, and related research.

(Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title I, §100], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–253, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title I, §100], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–253; Pub. L. 110–161, div. F, title I, §121, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 2121; Pub. L. 111–8, div. E, title I, §111, Mar. 11, 2009, 123 Stat. 723; Pub. L. 111–88, div. A, title I, §111, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2928.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–88, which directed that title 43 U.S.C. 1473 be amended by substituting "in fiscal years 2010 through 2013" for "in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 only", was executed to section 101(h) [title I, §100] of Pub. L. 99–591, which is classified to this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 111–8, which directed that title 43 U.S.C. 1473 be amended by substituting "in fiscal years 2008 and 2009 only" for "in fiscal year 2008 only", was executed to section 101(h) [title I, §100] of Pub. L. 99–591, which is classified to this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

2007—Pub. L. 110–161 which directed that title 43 U.S.C. 1473 be amended by inserting before period at end of section ", including, in fiscal year 2008 only, contributions of money and services to conduct work in support of the orderly exploration and development of Outer Continental Shelf resources, including but not limited to, preparation of environmental documents such as impact statements and assessments, studies, and related research", was executed to section 101(h) [title I, §100] of Pub. L. 99–591, which is classified to this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

The Minerals Management Service was abolished and functions divided among the Office of Natural Resources Revenue, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. See Secretary of the Interior Orders No. 3299 of May 19, 2010, and No. 3302 of June 18, 2010, and chapters II, V, and XII of title 30, Code of Federal Regulations, as revised by final rules of the Department of the Interior at 75 F.R. 61051 and 76 F.R. 64432.