alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,100
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,785,281
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    297,800,509
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             306,290,733
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                 5,235,350
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             81,247
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 284,999,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             306,290,733
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,908,728
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                82,088
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,990,816
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       10,990,816
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   26,554
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                920,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,045,386
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  10,045,386
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,045,386
<EPS-BASIC>                                22,641.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    377,369
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                40,333
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (26,554)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,333
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3071 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3071

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, 
   Deputy Executive Directors, and General Counsel of the Office of 
                Compliance to serve one additional term.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING CURRENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE 
              DIRECTORS, AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE TO 
              SERVE ONE ADDITIONAL TERM.

    (a) Executive Director.--Notwithstanding section 302(a)(3) of the 
Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)), the 
individual serving as Executive Director of the Office of Compliance as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act may serve one additional term.
    (b) Deputy Executive Directors.--Notwithstanding section 302(b)(2) 
of such Act (2 U.S.C. 1382(b)(2)), any individual serving as a Deputy 
Executive Director of the Office of Compliance as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act may serve one additional term.
    (c) General Counsel.--Notwithstanding section 302(c)(5) of such Act 
(2 U.S.C. 1382(c)(5)), the individual serving as General Counsel of the 
Office of Compliance as of the date of the enactment of this Act may 
serve one additional term.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 30, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3071

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To permit the individuals currently serving as Executive Director, 
   Deputy Executive Directors, and General Counsel of the Office of 
                Compliance to serve one additional term.
```
[4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ONCl!RRhNcr;S

ROUTLNG SYM~OL

Federal Aviation Administration

INITIM.SIS'G

INrTlALS ..S1Ci

IiAu _'-'--- ~I\TE"

!o/nj(u

ROLJI'ING £\'MHOL

- tDI

DATE c-~

to

RQUTI~(; SYMROl

-100

lr,:;~ "'1i~

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTranspol1ation

(DOT).

Airworthiness Directivesj Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243

RlN 2120-AA64

Airplanes, and Model A~30-300 Series Airplanes

ACTION: Final rule.

DATE

SUl\1MARY: We are adopting a new airworth.iness directive (AD) for the products list I~L~y~!(()

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0697j Directo.-ate Identifier 2010-NM-I02-AD; Amendme

1(;4-735 22- Db

39-*****; AD 2010-**-**]

14 CFR Part 39

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe ~o,~,,-,----

condition all an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

An A330 experienced an unconrnmnded engine #1 in flight spool down,

which occun"ed while applying fuel gravity feed procedure, in response to

low pressure indications frail) aJ] fuel boost pumps, in both left and right

wings.

The investigations revealed that the wing tank pressure switches PIN (part

lllunber) HTE69000-1 had frozen due to water accumulated in their

external pati, causing spurious low pressure indications.

lNITIAI.SiSiG

~"M_T,----

As per procedure, the main pumps are then switched off, increasing the

level of unavailable fuel. This, in combination with very Jaw fuel

quantities or another independent trapped fuel failure scenarios, can lead

to fuel starvation on the affected engine(s). * * * I'M"
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of GraphOn
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 7, 2005



<PAGE>


(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of GraphOn
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ William Swain
                                       ------------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 7, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2





SYNUTRA INTERNATIONAL, INC.





Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, Donghao Yang, Chief Financial Officer of Synutra International, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: June 14, 2011By:
/s/ Donghao YangName:
Donghao YangTitle:
Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Registrant’s Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
### §1118. Documents beyond scope of ordinary departmental business

A book or document not having to do with the ordinary business transactions of the executive departments may not be printed on the requisition of a department unless expressly authorized by Congress.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1264.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §219a (Mar. 3, 1905, ch. 1484, §1, 33 Stat. 1249).
### **CHAPTER 15—APPROPRIATION OF WATERS; RESERVOIR SITES**

Sec.
661.
Appropriation of waters on public lands; rights of way for canals and ditches.
662.
Reservation of reservoir sites generally.
663.
Restriction of sites to inclusion of necessary lands.
664.
Rights of way over reservoir sites generally.
665.
Rights of way over reservoir sites for wagon road, railroad, or other highway.
666.
Suits for adjudication of water rights.
### §485h–3. "Long-term contract" defined

As used in sections 485h–1 to 485h–5 of this title, the term "long-term contract" shall mean any contract the term of which is more than ten years.

(July 2, 1956, ch. 492, §3, 70 Stat. 484.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 which comprises this subchapter.
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and

collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent

with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 29, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

MARCUS D. SEWARD,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner

of the Social Security Administration,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 09-5140

(D.C. No. 4:08-CV-00464-TCK-PJC)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

Marcus D. Seward appeals from a judgment of the district court affirming

the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his

application for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits.

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), we

affirm.
-2-

Mr. Seward claimed disability beginning in June 2004, due to back and

neck injuries, depression, and a childhood polio deformity. The Administrative

Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied benefits after finding that Mr. Seward: (1) had the

severe impairment of degenerative disc disease; (2) his impairment did not meet

or equal a listing; (3) he was not entirely credible; and (4) he retained the residual

functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform sedentary work. On appeal, Mr. Seward

raises the same issues he raised in the district court: (1) the ALJ did not properly

evaluate his credibility; (2) the ALJ did not apply the correct legal standards in

assessing his RFC; and (3) the ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by

substantial evidence. 

We review de novo the district court’s decision to reverse the

[Commissioner], applying the same standards as those employed by

the district court. Judicial review of the [Commissioner’s] decision

is limited to a determination whether [his] factual findings are

supported by substantial evidence and whether [he] applied the

correct legal standards.

Nguyen v. Shalala, 43 F.3d 1400, 1402 (10th Cir. 1994) (citation omitted). We

have reviewed, de novo, the district court’s decision, which adopts the report and

recommendation of the magistrate judge to affirm the Commissioner’s denial of

benefits. The report and recommendation is thorough, well-reasoned and

persuasive on each point argued by Mr. Seward again in this court. We see no

reason to repeat the analysis, and we affirm for substantially the same reasons set
-3-

for in the report and recommendation dated August 6, 2009, and adopted by the

district court in its September 8, 2009 order. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

BILLY LEE HENDERSON, III,

 Appellant / Defendant,

 -vsSTATE OF MONTANA,

Appellee / Plaintiff.

CASE NO. DA-19-0396

ORDER GRANTING 

EXTENSION

Upon Defendant / Appellant’s foregoing motion and good cause appearing 

therefor;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED;

That Defendant / Appellant is granted an extension of time for the filing of 

Appellant's opening brief to August 27, 2020.

DATED and Electronically Signed Below

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 14 2020

05/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0396
### §471. Initial payment and annual installments of charges generally

Any entryman or applicant shall at the time of making water-right application or entry, as the case may be, pay into the reclamation fund 5 per centum of the construction charge fixed for his land as an initial installment, and shall pay the balance of said charge in annual installments. The first of the annual installments shall become due and payable on December 1 of the fifth calendar year after the initial installment: Provided, That any water-right applicant or entryman may, if he so elects, pay the whole or any part of the construction charges owing by him within any shorter period: Provided further, That entry may be made whenever water is available, as announced by the Secretary of the Interior, and the initial payment be made when the charge per acre is established.

(Aug. 13, 1914, ch. 247, §1, 38 Stat. 686.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section comprises part of section 1 of act Aug. 13, 1914. Remainder of section 1 is set out as section 472 of this title.
#### § 221.300 Changes in the plan of apartment ownership.

The mortgagee shall notify the Commissioner of any changes in the plan of apartment ownership and in the administration of the property. Such notification shall be given either at the time of the conveyance of the property or at the time of the assignment of the mortgage. Any changes in such plan shall require approval by the Commissioner.
### §1114. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–509, title IV, §4033(c)(1)(C)(i)(III), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1908

Section, Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, §1166, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 686, related to grant of trackage rights to any terminal railroad operating primarily in Philadelphia.
#### § 570.604 Environmental standards.

For purposes of section 104(g) of the Act, the regulations in 24 CFR part 58 specify the other provisions of law which further the purposes of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and the procedures by which grantees must fulfill their environmental responsibilities. In certain cases, grantees assume these environmental review, decisionmaking, and action responsibilities by execution of grant agreements with the Secretary.

[61 FR 11477, Mar. 20, 1996]
§ 3280.608 Hangers and supports. ( a ) *Strains and stresses.* Piping in a plumbing system shall be installed without undue strains and stresses, and provision shall be made for expansion, contraction, and structural settlement.
( b ) *Piping supports.* Piping must be secured at sufficiently close intervals to keep the pipe in alignment and carry the weight of the pipe and contents. Unless otherwise stated in the standards incorporated by reference for specific materials at § 3280.604(a), or unless specified by the pipe manufacturer, horizontal plastic drainage piping must be supported at intervals not to exceed 4 feet and horizontal plastic water piping must be supported at intervals not to exceed 3 feet. Vertical drainage and water piping must be supported at each story height.
( c ) *Hangers and anchors.* ( 1 ) Hangers and anchors shall be of sufficient strength to support their proportional share of the pipe alignments and prevent rattling.
( 2 ) Piping shall be securely attached to the structure by hangers, clamps, or brackets which provide protection against motion, vibration, road shock, or torque in the chassis.
( 3 ) Hangers and straps supporting plastic pipe shall not compress, distort, cut or abrade the piping and shall allow free movement of the pipe.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 86 FR 2521, Jan. 12, 2021]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6373
RICKY A. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH WILSON, Assistant Warden, M.C.A.C., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-249-HAR) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 6, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky A. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. Wilson , No. CA-96-249-HAR (D. Md. Feb. 26, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §3608. Federal risk and authorization management program

There is established within the General Services Administration the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program. The Administrator, subject to section 3614, shall establish a Government-wide program that provides a standardized, reusable approach to security assessment and authorization for cloud computing products and services that process unclassified information used by agencies.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, §5921(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3450.)

#### Repeal of Section

For repeal of section by section 5921(d)(1) of Pub. L. 117–263, see Effective Date of Repeal note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, §5921(d)(1), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3458, provided that the repeal of this section is effective on the date that is 5 years after Dec. 23, 2022.

#### Construction

For rule of construction regarding section 5921 of Pub. L. 117–263, see section 5921(e) of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 3607 of this title.
§ 248.177 Delegated responsibility to State agencies. ( a ) *In general.* The Commissioner shall delegate some or all responsibility for implementing subpart B of this part to a State housing agency if such agency submits a preservation plan acceptable to the Commissioner.
( b ) *Approval.* State preservation plans shall be submitted in such a form and in accordance with such procedures as the Commissioner shall establish. The Commissioner may approve plans that contain: ( 1 ) An inventory of low income housing located within the State that is or will be eligible low income housing under subpart B of this part within five years;
( 2 ) A description of the agency's experience in the area of multifamily financing and restructuring;
( 3 ) A description of the administrative resources that the agency will commit to the processing of plans of action in accordance with subpart B of this part;
( 4 ) A description of the administrative resources that the agency will commit to the monitoring of approved plans of action in accordance with subpart B of this part;
( 5 ) An independent analysis of the performance of the multifamily housing inventory financed or otherwise monitored by the agency;
( 6 ) A certification by the public official responsible for submitting the consolidated plan under 24 CFR part 91 that the proposed activities are consistent with the approved consolidated plan of the State within which the eligible low income housing is located; and
( 7 ) Such other certifications or information that the Commissioner determines to be necessary to implement an approved State preservation plan, which may include incentives that are authorized under other provisions of subpart B of this part.
( c ) *Implementation agreements.* The Commissioner may enter into any agreements necessary to implement an approved State preservation plan, which may include incentives that are authorized under other provisions of subpart B of this part.
( d ) *Fees.* Any State agency with responsibility so delegated under subpart B of this part may not charge any owner of eligible low income housing any fee for accepting notices of intent, processing plans of action or any other process pursuant to approval of a plan of action under subpart B of this part. This prohibition shall not preclude: ( 1 ) An owner paying for its appraisal or share of a joint appraisal under the provisions of § 248.111; or
( 2 ) A State agency from collecting fees normally associated with providing and processing financing insured under part 241 of this chapter.
[57 FR 12041, Apr. 8, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 16379, Mar. 30, 1995]