alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2306. Investment of funds

The Secretary of the Treasury shall receipt for moneys or securities composing trust funds given or bequeathed to the Board and shall invest, reinvest, and retain the moneys or securities as the Board from time to time determines. The Board may not engage in business or exercise a voting privilege which may be incidental to securities in such trust funds, nor may the Secretary of the Treasury make investments for the account of the Board which could not lawfully be made by a trust company in the District of Columbia, unless directly authorized by the instrument of gift or bequest under which the funds to be invested are derived, and may retain investments accepted by the Board.

(Pub. L. 90–620, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1292.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on 44 U.S. Code, 1964 ed., §300dd (July 9, 1941, ch. 284, §4, 55 Stat. 581).
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Joseph
Restivo, Chief Financial Officer of GVI Security Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(i)  The
Company’s accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii)  The
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Joseph
    RestivoJoseph
      RestivoChief
      Financial OfficerDated:  August
      14, 2009
### §5197e. Authorization of appropriations and transfers of funds

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

#### (b) Transfer authority

Funds made available for the purposes of this subchapter may be allocated or transferred for any of the purposes of this subchapter, with the approval of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to any agency or government corporation designated to assist in carrying out this subchapter. Each such allocation or transfer shall be reported in full detail to the Congress within 30 days after such allocation or transfer.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title VI, §626, as added Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2260 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §3412(a).
### §7921. Public participation; public hearings

In carrying out the provisions of this subchapter, including the designation of processing sites, establishing priorities for such sites, the selection of remedial actions, and the execution of cooperative agreements, the Secretary, the Administrator, and the Commission shall encourage public participation and, where appropriate, the Secretary shall hold public hearings relative to such matters in the States where processing sites and disposal sites are located.

(Pub. L. 95–604, title I, §111, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3031.)
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-88,185-01

EX P ARTE JERRY ANTOINE NOLAN, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W15-00427-M(A) IN THE 194T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u ng , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravat ed robber y , and he w as sentenc ed to 25 year s in prison. Applicant cla ims that trial counsel wrong ly advised him to reje ct a 12-year plea a g ree ment and that appellate counsel d en i ed h im his right to a direct appea l. See Lafl er v. Cooper , 132 S.Ct

. 1376 (2012); Ex parte Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 8 8 ). T h e t rial court enter ed an orde r d es i gn at i n g issues, but there are no finding s of fac t and conclusions of law resolving the claims.-2-

Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App

. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial cour t is the appropriate forum f or finding s of fa ct. T h e t ri al court shall order trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance by explaining counsels’ repr esentation of Applicant, including applicable strategy and tactica l decisions. To obtain the response s, the trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hearing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court sha ll appoint an attorney to repr esent Applica

nt at the hea

ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law reg arding the claims raised in the habea s application. The trial court may also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law it dee ms releva

nt and appropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claims for ha

beas r elief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be res o l v ed within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order

. Any extensions of time shall be obtained fr om this C ourt. Filed: Apr il 18, 2018 Do not publish
**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard Blass, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
                as
                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                at the dates and for the periods
                indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.









Date:  May
      10,
      2007







/s/
      Richard Blass


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________




Richard
      Blass


*Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
#### JONES, Appellant, v. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by George E. Jones against the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                 151
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          162
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       332
<PP&E>                                                 343
<DEPRECIATION>                                         144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  383
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 5
<OTHER-SE>                                             140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           543
<SALES>                                                358
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       358
<CGS>                                                    1
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            1
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        29
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,224)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.48)
        


</TABLE>
#### GLASSBERG v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

Carriers—Negligence—Action—Evidence—Sufficiency.

Where an open street car, which was on fire, came to such a sudden stop as to hurl a passenger to the pavement, in an action for the injuries it was error to direct a nonsuit on evidence showing such facts, since, if the motorman stopped the car, his conduct was plainly negligent, and if the fire caused the sudden stoppage the burden was on defendant to explain the cause of the accident

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District.

Action by Jacob H. Glassberg against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant sppfsls Reversed

Argued before SCOTT, O’GORMAN, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

R. Marks, for appellant.

William E. Weaver, for respondent.

*732O’GORMAN, J.

Plaintiff’s daughter boarded an open northbound car operated by the defendant at Astor Place, and rode uptown as far as Ninety-First street on Madison avenue. She was-seated on the east end of the fourth seat from the rear. When the, car reached Ninety-First street she discovered that the car was on fire, particularly on the left side, about two rows of seats in front of her. The car was running fast, and proceeded for some distance-to Ninety-Second street, where it came to a sudden stop with a. violent jerk, which threw the young woman from her seat in the-car to the street. The flames were not extinguished until the car-stopped. To nonsuit the plaintiff upon this evidence was error. If this car was stopped by the motorman with a jerk so violent as to hurl a passenger from her. seat to the pavement, the occurrence-was plainly the result of his improper application of the motive power. Hassen v. Nassau R. R., 34 App. Div. 71, 53 N. Y. Supp. 1069; Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights R. R., 32 App. Div. 13, 52 N. Y. Supp. 1051. If the car came to a stop because of the fire which enveloped the car, the burden was upon .the defendant of explaining the accident so as to relieve itself from liability. Clarke v. Railroad, 9 App. Div. 51, 41 N. Y. Supp. 78; Seybolt v. Road, 95 N. Y. 562, 47 Am. Rep. 75.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 30.40 Loan guarantees for Indian housing. ( a ) *General.* The Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing (or his/her designee) may initiate a civil money penalty action against any mortgagee or holder of a guarantee certificate who knowingly and materially violates the provisions of 12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a(g)(2) concerning loan guarantees for Indian housing.
( b ) *Continuing violation.* Each day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate violation.
( c ) *Amount of penalty.* The maximum penalty is $12,249 for each violation, up to a limit of $2,449,575 for all violations committed during any one-year period. Each violation shall constitute a separate violation as to each mortgage or loan application.
[61 FR 50215, Sept. 24, 1996, as amended at 65 FR 9087, Feb. 23, 2000; 68 FR 12788, Mar. 17, 2003; 72 FR 5588, Feb. 6, 2007; 78 FR 4059, Jan. 18, 2013; 81 FR 38935, June 15, 2016; 82 FR 24524, May 30, 2017; 83 FR 32793, July 16, 2018; 84 FR 9453, Mar. 15, 2019; 85 FR 13044, Mar. 6, 2020; 86 FR 14373, Mar. 16, 2021; 87 FR 24420, Apr. 26, 2022; 88 FR 9748, Feb. 15, 2023; 89 FR 13616, Feb. 23, 2024]
### §9919. Drug and child support services and referrals

#### (a) Drug testing and rehabilitation

#### (1) In general

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prohibit a State from testing participants in programs, activities, or services carried out or provided under this chapter for controlled substances. A State that conducts such testing shall inform the participants who test positive for any of such substances about the availability of treatment or rehabilitation services and refer such participants for appropriate treatment or rehabilitation services.

#### (2) Administrative expenses

Any funds provided under this chapter expended for such testing shall be considered to be expended for administrative expenses and shall be subject to the limitation specified in section 9907(b)(2) of this title.

#### (3) Definition

In this subsection, the term "controlled substance" has the meaning given the term in section 802 of title 21.

#### (b) Child support services and referrals

During each fiscal year for which an eligible entity receives a grant under section 9907 of this title, such entity shall—

(1) inform custodial parents in single-parent families that participate in programs, activities, or services carried out or provided under this chapter about the availability of child support services; and

(2) refer eligible parents to the child support offices of State and local governments.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §678G, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, §201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2749.)
### §942–9. Map location of road

The map and profile of definite location of such railroad, wagon road, or tramway, to be filed as hereinbefore provided, shall, when the line passes over surveyed lands, indicate the location of the road by reference to section or other established survey corners, and where such line passes over unsurveyed lands the location thereon shall be indicated by courses and distances and by references to natural objects and permanent monuments in such manner that the location of the road may be readily determined by reference to descriptions given in connection with said profile map.

(May 14, 1898, ch. 299, §9, 30 Stat. 413.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 419 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal; Savings Provision

Section repealed by Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §706(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2793, effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as applicable to the issuance of rights-of-way over, upon, under, and through the public lands and lands in the National Forest System. Such repeal not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
§ 350.4 Law governing rights and obligations of United States, and Federal Reserve Banks as Depositories; Rights of any Person against United States, and Federal Reserve Banks as Depositories; Law Governing Other Interests. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the following rights and obligations are governed solely by the book-entry regulations contained in this part, the Securities Documentation, and Federal Reserve Bank Operating Circulars (but not including any choice of law provisions in the Security Documentation to the extent such provisions conflict with the Book-entry regulations contained in this part): ( 1 ) The rights and obligations of a Federal Reserve Bank as a Depository with respect to: ( i ) A Book-entry Ginnie Mae Security or Security Entitlement; and
( ii ) The operation of a book-entry system operated by a Depository as it applies to Ginnie Mae Securities; and
( 2 ) The rights of any Person, including a Participant, against the Federal Reserve Banks as Depositories with respect to: ( i ) A Book-entry Ginnie Mae Security or Security Entitlement; and
( ii ) The operation of the book-entry system operated by the Federal Reserve Banks as Depositories as it applies to Ginnie Mae Securities.
( b ) A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Participant and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 350.5(c)(1), is governed by the law (not including the conflict-of-law rules) of the jurisdiction where the head office of the Federal Reserve Bank maintaining the Participant's Securities Account is located. A security interest in a Security Entitlement that is in favor of a Federal Reserve Bank from a Person that is not a Participant, and that is not recorded on the books of a Federal Reserve Bank pursuant to § 350.5(c)(1), is governed by the law determined in the manner specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) If the jurisdiction specified in the first sentence of paragraph (b) of this section is a State that has not adopted Revised Article 8, then the law specified in paragraph (b) of this section shall be the law of that State as though Revised Article 8 had been adopted by that State.
( d ) To the extent not otherwise inconsistent with this part, and notwithstanding any provision in the Security Documentation setting forth a choice of law, the provision set forth in 31 CFR 357.11 regarding law governing other interests apply and shall be read as though modified to effectuate the application of 31 CFR 357.11 to Book-entry Ginnie Mae Securities.
1 

### Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:44 PM To: Brown, Kelly Subject: FW: Ozone Studies Requested in Interagency Comments Attachments: Kim et al 2011.pdf; Schelegle et al 2009.pdf; McDon nell et al 2012.pdf; Schelegle et al 2012.pdf

Please post email to Ozone NAAQS Rulemaking docket. Attachments are likely already in docket as refere nces supporting rulemaking. Thanks

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 5:25 PM To: 'Frey, Nathan J.' Cc: Wesson, Karen; Smith, Darcie; Kimber Scavo Subject: Ozone Studies Requested in Interagency Comments

Nathan –

Attached are the 4 studies requested by interagency partners in comments on the draft Ozone NPRM. Please share with the group.

Thanks, Erika
### §1201. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1201 was editorially reclassified as section 1457c of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.16 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Department must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the Office of Manufactured Housing Programs, Manufactured Housing and Construction Standards Division, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Room B-133, Washington, DC 20410, 202-402-5216, and is available from the sources listed below. Copies of incorporated standards that are not available from their producer organizations may be obtained from the Office of Manufactured Housing Programs. These standards are also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For more information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169, telephone number 800-344-3555, website *http://www.nfpa.org .* ( 1 ) NFPA 1192, Standard on Recreational Vehicles, 2015 Edition, issued August 14, 2014, IBR approved for § 3282.15(b).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) Recreational Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA), 1896 Preston White Drive, Reston, VA 20191, telephone number 703-620-6003, website *http://www.rvia.org .* ( 1 ) ANSI A119.5: Park Model Recreational Vehicle Standard, 2015 Edition, ANSI-approved April 7, 2015, IBR approved for § 3282.15(b).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[83 FR 57688, Nov. 16, 2018]