alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
                                TIME WARNER INC.
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Time Warner Inc. for the nine months ended September 30,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               601
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                       1,477
<INVENTORY>                                        6,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   8,009
<PP&E>                                            15,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                     6,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    50,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              9,402
<BONDS>                                           18,094
<COMMON>                                              13
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                         9,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      50,080
<SALES>                                           20,517
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  20,517
<CGS>                                             11,995
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     11,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      314
<INCOME-TAX>                                         252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   62
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                            443
<NET-INCOME>                                        (381)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.30)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.5





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS





We hereby consent to the use of and reference to our name and our reports, and the inclusion of information derived from our reports, evaluating Vermilion Energy Inc.’s petroleum and natural gas reserves as at December 31, 2010, in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Vermilion Energy Inc.





Yours very truly,





(“GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.”)





GLJ Petroleum Consultants Ltd.


4100, 400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.,


Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2


(403) 266-9500    Fax (403) 262-1855





March 11, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,911,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,766,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,595,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            85,549,655
<PP&E>                                      84,549,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                 860,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,336,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,781,389
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,250
<OTHER-SE>                                  63,680,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,336,522
<SALES>                                      4,021,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,728,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,125,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               623,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             880,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (900,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (900,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (900,538)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.08)
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page1 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page2 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 3 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page3 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 4 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page4 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 5 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page5 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 6 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page6 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 7 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page7 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 8 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page8 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 9 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page9 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 10 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page10 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 11 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page11 of 12
Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 12 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26 Filed07/06/10 Page12 of 12
B1

A1 to A8

C1

C2

C3

C4

Figure-01

Locations of Inaccessible Features

Old Town Center

Elm St.

Alley

University Ave.

Case 3:09-cv-02123-JL Document 28 Filed 07/12/10 Page 13 of 13 Case3:09-cv-02123-JL Document26-1 Filed07/06/10 Page1 of 1
#### § 266.15 Risk-Sharing Agreement.

Execution of a Risk-Sharing Agreement is a prerequisite to participation in this program. The Risk-Sharing Agreement shall be in a form acceptable to the Commissioner.

[61 FR 7947, Feb. 29, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 Defendants R.R. Street & Co., Inc. and Multimatic, LLC have filed statements of

non-opposition to KFD’s motion; no other parties have responded to the motion. 

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California

Corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner,

Plaintiffs,

 vs.

CITY OF EUREKA,

Defendant. /

And Related Counterclaims, Cross-Claims,

and Third-Party Claims.

 /

Case No. C 08-04571 MMC

ORDER VACATING APRIL 9, 2010

HEARINGS

Before the Court is plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc.’s (“KFD”) Motion for Leave to File

Third Amended Complaint (“MLA”), filed February 12, 2010. Defendant Environmental

Resolutions, Inc. (“ERI”) has filed opposition, to which KFD has replied.1

 Also before the

Court is defendant, third-party defendant and cross-defendant ERI’s Motion for Judgment

on the Pleadings, filed February 26, 2010. Plaintiff KFD Enterprises (“KFD”) and crossclaimant Winzler & Kelly, have filed oppositions to ERI’s motion, to which ERI has

separately replied. Additionally, third-party plaintiff Unocal Corporation, cross-claimant

Union Oil Company of California, and their corporate parent, Chevron Corporation, have

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 219 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

 ERI and cross-claimant City of Eureka (“the City”) have filed a stipulation by which

the City will file a Third Amended Complaint as against ERI. 

2

jointly filed opposition to ERI’s motion, to which ERI has replied.2 

Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the

pending motions, the Court deems the matters appropriate for decision thereon and hereby

VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 9, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 219 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[House Report 105-15]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

105th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 1st Session                                                     105-15
_______________________________________________________________________

                    PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF
 
            H.R. 852, THE PAPERWORK ELIMINATION ACT OF 1997

                                _______
                                

   March 11, 1997.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 88]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 88, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

               brief summary of provisions of resolution

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 852, the 
``Paperwork Elimination Act of 1997'' under an open rule. The 
rule provides one hour of general debate divided equally 
between the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Small Business.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record 
prior to their consideration will be given priority in 
recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise consistent 
with House rules. Finally, the rule provides for one motion to 
recommit, with or without instructions.

                                

```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOMECOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,030,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,038,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                   215,539
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,029,992
<PP&E>                                       2,499,261
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,599,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,312,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,944,402
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    282,698
<COMMON>                                           879
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,702,114
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,312,494
<SALES>                                      4,619,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,619,957
<CGS>                                        2,183,324
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,183,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,308,223
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (30,464)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,795,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,795,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,795,167)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.610 Policy.

It is the policy of the Department to administer its FHA housing programs affirmatively, as to achieve a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market area have a like range of housing choices available to them regardless of their race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin. Each applicant for participation in FHA subsidized and unsubsidized housing programs shall pursue affirmative fair housing marketing policies in soliciting buyers and tenants, in determining their eligibility, and in concluding sales and rental transactions.

[40 FR 20080, May 8, 1975, as amended at 58 FR 41337, Aug. 3, 1993]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROMEO V. APOSTOL,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CASTRO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02676 JSW

ORDER REFERRING LITIGANT

TO FEDERAL PRO BONO

PROJECT AND STAYING

PROCEEDINGS PENDING

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

The plaintiff Romeo Apostol (“Apostol”) having requested and being in need of counsel

to assist him/her in this matter and good and just cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Apostol shall be referred to the Federal Pro Bono

Project in the manner set forth below:

1. The Clerk of this Court shall forward to the Volunteer Legal Services Program of

the Bar Association of San Francisco (“BASF”) one (1) copy of the court file

with a notice of referral of the case pursuant to the guidelines of the Federal Pro

Bono Project for referral to a volunteer attorney.

2. Upon being notified by the BASF that an attorney has been located to represent

the Apostol, that attorney shall be appointed as counsel for Apostol in this matter

until further order of the Court.

3. All proceedings in this action are hereby stayed for ninety days. However, if

counsel has been found for Apostol sooner, the stay will be lifted four weeks 

Case 3:09-cv-02676-JSW Document 38 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

from the date an attorney is appointed to represent Apostol. This stay includes

the pending motion to dismiss. Therefore, the hearing currently set for February

19, 2010 is HEREBY VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 18, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02676-JSW Document 38 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES

INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAL ROSELLI, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00404 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS TO BILLS OF COSTS

The parties have filed a stipulated motion to extend the filing dates for objections to the

bills of costs filed on April 26, 2010. The parties have not shown good cause for such an

extension. Moreover, they should not have waited until May 10, 2010 — the due date for the

objections — before seeking an extension. The motion is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 11, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 660 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             351
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,152
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,463
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,771
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,730
<LOANS>                                         39,793
<ALLOWANCE>                                        805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,106
<DEPOSITS>                                      54,396
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                311
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  70,106
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    801
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  286
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   147
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,234
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 605
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 605
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              629
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        5
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    310
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         310
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.17
<LOANS-NON>                                         37
<LOANS-PAST>                                        54
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,508
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   803
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       40
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  805
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               109
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            696
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELOISA ASCUE,

Plaintiff,

v

SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC, et al,

Defendants. /

No C 09-2510 VRW

ORDER

 On September 3, 2009, plaintiff filed a notice of

settlement: “the parties [hereto] have reached a settlement.” Doc

#5. The parties did not, however, file a stipulated dismissal and

there has been no docket activity for several months. 

There appearing no good cause for this matter to remain

open, the clerk is directed to close the file and terminate all

pending motions. Any party adversely affected by the closure of

this file may apply to re-open if such application is served and

filed not later than July 30, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02510-VRW Document 6 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Rand AcquisitionCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacityand on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|          |                                                                                                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|          |                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of theCompany. |

January 10, 2006

|  | By: /s/Laurence S. Levy             Laurence S. Levy            Chairman of the Board and            Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----