alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE GHOLSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

MYLAN, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02042 JSW

ORDER VACATING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

AND SETTING DEADLINES

The Court has received and considered the parties’ supplemental Joint Case

Management Statement and HEREBY VACATES the case management conference set for

April 30, 2010. The Case Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by

this Order. It is further ORDERED that:

A. DATES

Jury Trial Date: June 13, 2011 at 8:00 a.m., 15 day estimate

Pretrial Conference: May 23, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.

Hearing on Daubert motions: March 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

Deadline to file Daubert motions: January 28, 2011

Discovery cut-off: January 28, 2011

Hearing on dispositive motions: December 17, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

Deadline to file dispositive motions: November 12, 2010

Designation of Defendant’s Experts: November 24, 2010

Designation of Plaintiff’s Experts: September 24, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document 74 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

B. DISCOVERY

The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses

pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 

discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all

supplementation has been completed.

C. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER

No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its

own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)

without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline

contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties

may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the

date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to

a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule

that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are

specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain

leave of Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02042-JSW Document 74 Filed 04/26/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Corey Cox, Appellant.

[835 NYS2d 789]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Russell P. Buscaglia, A.J.), rendered October 19, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

*1182Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [2]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered *(see People v Gilbert,*17 AD3d 1164 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 762 [2005]; *People v DeJesus,*248 AD2d 1023 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 878 [1998]). Although Supreme Court made only one direct inquiry concerning the waiver during the plea colloquy, we conclude that the waiver was validly entered, based on defendant’s response to that inquiry and the facts and circumstances surrounding the waiver *(see People v Coleman*[appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827 [1995]; *see generally People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]). The unrestricted waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence *(see People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; *People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.
### §3796d–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796d–5 was editorially reclassified as section 10306 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXI—CLOSED BASIN DIVISION; SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, COLORADO
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Dilworth, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 11, 2006



<PAGE>




(b) Certification of Quarterly Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, William Swain, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ William Swain
                                       ------------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 11, 2006
## THE STATE OF TEXAS
MANDATE

TO THE 71ST DISTRICT COURT OF HARRISON CO UNTY, GREETINGS:
Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 16th
day of September, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Cedric Jamar Hill, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 15

- 00005

- CR

Trial Court No. 12

- 0317X

As stated in the Court’s opinion of thi s date, we find that the motion of the appellant to
dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.
We note that the appellant, Cedric Jamar Hill, has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this
behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with
the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 12th day of November , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTRE Y , Clerk
```

[110th Congress Public Law 86]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ086.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 979]]

Public Law 110-86
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide authority to the Peace Corps to provide separation pay for 
    host country resident personal services contractors of the Peace 
             Corps. <<NOTE: Sept. 27, 2007 -  [H.R. 3528]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 22 USC 2514a.>> AUTHORIZATION FOR PEACE CORPS 
                              TO PROVIDE SEPARATION PAY FOR HOST 
                              COUNTRY RESIDENT PERSONAL SERVICES 
                              CONTRACTORS OF THE PEACE CORPS.

    (a) Establishment of Fund.--There is established in the Treasury of 
the United States a fund for the Peace Corps to provide separation pay 
for host country resident personal services contractors of the Peace 
Corps.
    (b) Funding.--The Director of the Peace Corps may deposit in the 
fund established under subsection (a)--
            (1) amounts previously obligated and not canceled to provide 
        the separation pay described in such subsection; and
            (2) amounts obligated for fiscal years after fiscal year 
        2006 for current and future costs of providing such separation 
        pay.

    (c) Availability.--Beginning in fiscal year 2007, amounts deposited 
in the fund established under subsection (a) shall be available without 
fiscal year limitation for severance, retirement, or other separation 
payments to host country resident personal services contractors of the 
Peace Corps in countries where such payments are legally authorized.

    Approved September 27, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3528:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Sept. 17, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
S u m m a r y o f C o mm e n t s R ece i v e d a n d R e s po n ses

A g e n d a I t e m 08

- 4

- 08

C o n s i d e r e d A p r il 24

, 2 0 08

C o mm e n t: T h e B o a r d s h o u l d a d o p t t h e S I P

- b as e d b u d g e t s b eca u se t h e y

r e f l ec t t h e c o n t r o l s t r a t e g i e s c o n t a i n e d i n t h e a pp r o v e d S o u t h C o as t p l a n s

f o r o z o n e a n d P M 2

. 5

, a s w e ll a s t h e a do p t e d S t a t e S t r a t e g y

, b e c a u se t h e y

a r e m o r e p r o t ec t i v e o f t h e p u b li c h ea l t h.

C o m m en t e r : D r

. B a rr y W a l l e r s t e i n

, S ou t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M anage m en t D i s t r i c t.

R es po n se : N o r e s pon s e ne c e ss a r y

.

C o mm e n t: T h e a tt a i n m e n t d e m o n s t r a t i o n do es no t p r o v i d e f o r a t t a i n m e n t

i n c o mm u n i t i es a d j a ce n t t o h ea v il y t r a v e l e d f r ee w a y s

.

C o m m en t e r : E ndange r ed H a b i t a t s Lea g ue

, N a t u r a l R e s o u r c e s D e f en s e C o u n c il

R es po n se : T h e S I P de m on s t r a t e s a tt a i n m en t o f t he s t and a r d a t t he r e g i on a l

l e v e l a c c o r d i n g t o U

. S

. EPA gu i dan c e

. A d d i t i ona l l y

, t he P l an c o n t a i n s c o n t r o l

m ea s u r e s w h i c h r edu c e e m i s s i on s f r o m d i r e c t l y e m i tt ed P M 2

. 5 an d i t s p r e c u r s o r s

a t bo t h t he r e g i on a l a n d l o c a l l e v e l

. U l t i m a t e l y t h i s que s t i on r e l a t e d t o S I P

app r o v a b il i t y r a t h e r t h a n bu d ge t a d equa cy

.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 22, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 22, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A1720. HERITAGE HEALTHCARE OF GRIFFIN, LLC n/k/a PRUITTHEALGRIFFIN, LLC et al. v. IDA J. HARDEN, AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR 

EUGENE HARDEN.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David D. Wesselink
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            March 2, 2004
§ 103.30 How should I bring a claim that I am the victim of discrimination? ( a ) You can file a claim by mail or telephone with any of HUD's Offices of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity or with any State or local agency that HUD has certified to receive complaints.
( b ) You can call or go to any other HUD office for help in filing a claim. These offices will send your claim to HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, which will contact you about the filing of your complaint.
[64 FR 18540, Apr. 14, 1999]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of Delta Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Hugh Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: August 16, 2004


Hugh Miller


President and Chief Executive Officer
§ 248.319 Application for assistance. ( a ) *Application for assistance.* State agencies or local housing authorities shall submit an application for assistance in a form prescribed by the Commissioner with the local HUD field office having jurisdiction over the project. The application shall include: ( 1 ) A copy of the approved plan of action, including all applicable notices of intent;
( 2 ) A copy of any worksheet or other document which demonstrates the extension and transfer preservation values of the project, the Federal cost limits (including the determination of relevant local market rents if applicable), and the preservation rents;
( 3 ) A request for each incentive required as part of the approved plan of action and the amount thereof;
( 4 ) A demonstration and certification by the Executive Director of the State agency or local housing authority that the assistance and incentives requested as part of the approved plan of action do not exceed the level of incentives required for a similarly situated project which is eligible low income housing as defined in subpart B of this part;
( 5 ) Copies of proposed agreements, contracts and mortgage modifications proposed pursuant to § 248.315.
( b ) *Notification of approval.* Not later than 90 days after receipt of the application for assistance, the local HUD field office shall notify the Executive Director of the State agency or local housing authority of the approval or disapproval of the application. If the application is disapproved, the notification shall state the reasons therefor and afford the State agency or local housing authority the opportunity to revise the application to make it approvable.
( c ) *Funding.* After approving the State agency's or local housing authority's application for assistance, the HUD field office shall make the assistance in the approved application available to the State agency or local housing authority within the time frames specified in § 248.169.
( d ) *Agreements.* The State agency or local housing authority shall provide the local HUD field office with a copy of all agreements entered into with the owner pursuant to § 248.315.
( e ) *Section 8 contract administration.* Any contract for Section 8 assistance made pursuant to the approved plan of action, the State agency's or local housing authority's application for assistance and the regulations at 24 CFR 886, subpart A shall be administered by the State agency or local housing authority pursuant to § 886.120 of this title.
(February 7, 1961)

#### Ludmilla Hunter, Appellant, v. Allan B. Hunter, Respondent.

Order entered on October 17, 1960, granting defendant’s motion to enjoin the plaintiff and her attorneys from proceeding with or taking any steps in pursuance of or in support of plaintiff’s action against the defendant in the *899Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, County of Fairfield, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur—-Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Roebling  Financial Corp, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  September 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  we, Frank J. Travea, III, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Janice A. Summers,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


         A signed  original of this  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                        <C>

/s/ Frank J. Travea, III                        /s/ Janice A. Summers
-------------------------------------           ----------------------------------------------
Frank J. Travea, III                            Janice A. Summers
President and Chief Executive Officer           Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
                                                and Chief Financial Officer




December 28, 2004
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 14(1)**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3ASR—FileNo. 333-162149—Film No. 091088582) of Desarrolladora Homex S.A.B. deC.V. and in the related prospectus of our reports dated June 30, 2010,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Desarrolladora HomexS.A.B. de C.V and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Desarrolladora Homex S.A.B. de C.V and subsidiaries,included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year endedDecember 31, 2009.

 

Mancera,S.C.

Amember practice of

Ernst & Young Global

 

 
| /s/ C.P.C Alejandro Valdez Mendoza   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| C.P.C Alejandro Valdez Mendoza       |   |
|                                 |   |
| Culiacán,  Sinaloa, México |   |
| June 30,  2010                  |   |

 

----
#### § 3280.1 Scope.

This standard covers all equipment and installations in the design, construction, transportation, fire safety, plumbing, heat-producing and electrical systems of manufactured homes which are designed to be used as dwelling units. This standard seeks to the maximum extent possible to establish performance requirements. In certain instances, however, the use of specific requirements is necessary.

[58 FR 55002, Oct. 25, 1993]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United 

States District 

Court

For the Northern District of California 

**E-filed 04/26/2010** 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

SHARON S. HENRY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et 

al., 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/

No. C 09-0628 RS 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING 

The hearing on Defendants’ motion for attorney fees and costs is hereby continued to May 

20, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. No later than May 6, 2010, defendants may file a supplemental reply brief 

addressing the substance of any arguments made for the first time in plaintiff’s amended opposition 

filed on March 17, 2010. The motion to strike the amended opposition is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 04/26/2010 

RICHARD SEEBORG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-00628-RS Document 100 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 93 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 93 Filed 04/09/10 Page 2 of 3
April 9

Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 93 Filed 04/09/10 Page 3 of 3