alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                          THREE MONTH ENDED                    NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            SEPTEMBER 30,                        SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
                                                        1997              1996               1997              1996
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Primary earnings per common share:

Net Income                                          $  3,577,991      $  2,100,604      $  8,106,954      $  4,804,745

Add interest on $2,000,000 convertible note
payable, net of tax                                            -            29,700                 -            89,100
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
Net income as adjusted for calculation of primary
earnings per share                                  $  3,577,991      $  2,130,304      $  8,106,954      $  4,893,845
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding                                           10,921,314         8,000,000        10,792,743         8,000,000

Weighted average shares of common stock
equivalents, utilizing the treasury stock method          91,319             4,750            39,429             4,750

Weighted average number of shares issuable
from assumed exercise of $2,000,000 convertible
note payable (a)                                               -           503,853                 -           503,853
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares, as adjusted for
calculation of primary earnings per common share      11,012,633         8,508,606        10,832,172         8,508,606
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
Primary earnings per common share                   $       0.32      $       0.25      $       0.75      $       0.56
                                                    ------------------------------      ------------------------------
</TABLE>

(a)  For 1996, represents the weighted average of 503,853 common shares from the
     assumed conversion of the 2,000,000 convertible note payable on May 26,
     1995.

                                       18
§ 248.131 Information from the Commissioner. ( a ) *Information to owners terminating affordability restrictions.* Within six months after receipt of a notice of intent to terminate the low income affordability restrictions under § 248.141, the Commissioner shall provide the owner with a description of the criteria for such termination and with information that the owner needs to prepare a plan of action. This shall include information concerning the standards under § 248.141 regarding the approval of a plan of action and a list of the Federal incentives authorized under § 248.153 and available to those projects for which a plan of action involving termination of low income affordability restrictions, through prepayment of the mortgage or termination of the mortgage insurance contract, would not be approvable. The Commissioner shall also provide the owner with any other relevant information which the Commissioner may possess.
( b ) *Information to owners extending affordability restrictions.* Within nine months of receipt of a notice of intent to extend the low income affordability restrictions under § 248.153 or to transfer the project under § 248.157, the Commissioner shall provide the owner who submitted the notice with— ( 1 ) A statement of the preservation values of the project as determined under § 248.111;
( 2 ) A statement of the aggregate preservation rents for the project as calculated under § 248.121;
( 3 ) A statement of the applicable Federal cost limit for the market area (or relevant local market, if applicable) in which the project is located, and an explanation of the limitations under § 248.127 on the amount of assistance the Commissioner may provide based on such cost limits;
( 4 ) A statement of whether either of the aggregate preservation rents exceeds the Federal cost limit; and
( 5 ) A direction to file a plan of action and the information necessary to file a plan of action; or
( 6 ) A direction to submit a second notice of intent under § 248.133.
( c ) *Information to tenants and State or local governments.* The Commissioner shall provide any information provided to the owner under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section to the tenant representative, if any, known to the Commissioner, and shall post a notice in each affected building informing tenants of the name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of the tenant representative(s) and appropriate personnel in the local HUD field office, from whom they may obtain this information. The Commissioner shall also provide this information to that officer of State or local government to whom the owner submitted a notice of intent pursuant to § 248.105(c). The Commissioner shall include in the information packet made available to the tenants any other information relating to their rights and opportunities, including— ( 1 ) The potential opportunity of the tenants to become priority purchasers under §§ 248.157 and 248.161; and
( 2 ) The potential opportunity of resident homeownership under §§ 248.173 or 248.175.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—PUBLIC LAND LAW REVIEW COMMISSION
Exhibit
10.2

     

    AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

    EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT

    


    This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment”),
dated as of November 3, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), hereby amends the
Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2010 (the “Agreement”), by and between
AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., 59 Maiden Lane, 6th floor,
New York, New York, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Michael J. Saxon,
an individual residing at 514 Brookstone Court, Copley, Ohio 44321
(Executive”).

    


    WHEREAS, Executive and the
Company intend that the Profit Bonus provided for in the Agreement qualify for
the performance-based exception to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code.

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

    


    1.           Section
3(b) (Profit
Bonus) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting paragraph (ii) in
its entirety.

    


    2.           All
other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in effect in accordance with
their terms.

    


    AMTRUST
FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


    


    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  	
                          By:
      

                        	/s/
      Stephen Ungar	 	
                          /s/
      Michael J. Saxon

                        
	
                           

                        	    
      Stephen Ungar
    
Secretary	 	
                          Michael
      J.
Saxon
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY L. BOWLING, 

Plaintiff, No. C 09-1581 MHP (EDL)

v. ORDER ALLOWING APPEARANCE 

BY TELEPHONE

THE PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________________/

 Pursuant to the request of counsel for Plaintiff Gregory Bowling, Plaintiff may attend the

settlement conference on April 15, 2010 by telephone. All parties appearing for the settlement

conference by telephone must be available for the duration of the conference. If the Court concludes

that the absence of any party is interfering with the settlement conference, the Court may continue

the settlement conference and may order personal attendance by each party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 5, 2010 _______________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01581-MHP Document 42 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Jatinder SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-75626.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 21, 2007.

*654Tsz-Hai Huang, Manish Daftari, Rai & Associates, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Robert F. Adams, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division/Fraud Section, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jatinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Because it is unclear whether the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) adopted the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision, we “look to the IJ’s oral decision as a guide to what lay behind the BIA’s conclusion,” and review these determinations for substantial evidence. *Avetova-Elisseva v. INS,*213 F.3d 1192, 1197 (9th Cir.2000). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. The record contains insufficient evidence to compel the conclusion that the police who detained and beat Singh on two occasions were motivated on account of an imputed political opinion. *See Dinu v. Ashcroft,*372 F.3d 1041, 1044 (9th Cir. 2004); *cf. Singh v. Ilchert,*63 F.3d 1501, 1509 (9th Cir.1995) (“The very language of the BIA’s opinion ... concedes that petitioner was ‘thought’ by the police to be associated with Sikhs seeking a violent overthrow of the government.”).

Further, Singh failed to show it was more likely than not that he would be tortured should he return to India, and thus he is not eligible for CAT relief. *See Zhang v. Ashcroft,*388 F.3d 713, 721-22 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 4.82



Amendment to the Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of shares in

PT Cyber Access Communications dated 9 March 2005 (SPA) between Young Crown

Mobile Limited, PT Asia Mobile, AsiaTelecommunication Technology Limited and

Hutchison Telecommunications International (Netherlands) B.V. (the Parties)



It is hereby agreed by the Parties that the:



| | (a) | the terms used in this Amendment have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the SPA unless otherwise indicated;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the CP Satisfaction Date at clause 1.1 of the SPA is extended from 30 April 2005 to 31 July 2005; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | nothing herein affects or relieves the Seller or the Purchase from their respective obligations under clause 2.3 of the SPA.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 2005                                            
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Signed for and on behalf of                                  
|Yong Crown Mobile Limited                                    
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Signed for and on behalf of                                  
|PT Asia Mobile                                               
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Signed for and on behalf of                                  
|Asia Telecommunication Technology Limited                    
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Signed for and on behalf of                                  
|Hutchison Telecommunications International (Netherlands) B.V.
§ 206.61 HECM proceeds during a Deferral Period. ( a ) The HECM is not assumable. HECM proceeds may not be disbursed to any party during a Deferral Period, except as determined by the Commissioner through notice.
( b ) If a Repair Set Aside was established as a condition of the HECM, funds may be disbursed from the Repair Set Aside during a Deferral Period for the sole purpose of paying the cost of those repairs that were specifically identified prior to origination as necessary to the insurance of the HECM. Repairs under this paragraph shall only be paid for using funds from the Repair Set Aside if the repairs are satisfactorily completed during the time period established in the Repair Rider or such additional time as provided by the Commissioner. Unused funds remaining beyond the established time period shall not be disbursed.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2906

To suspend temporarily the duty on linuron. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on linuron.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LINURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.70 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)–1-

methoxy-1-methylurea(CAS 

No. 330–55–2) (provided for 

in subheading 2924.21.16) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2906 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 242.46 Insured advances—building loan agreement.

Prior to the initial endorsement of the mortgage for insurance, the mortgagor and mortgagee shall execute a building loan agreement, approved by HUD, setting forth the terms and conditions under which progress payments may be advanced during construction. To be covered by mortgage insurance, or to be included as an eligible cost, each progress payment involving mortgage proceeds and the owner's equity requirement shall be approved by HUD.
213 A.2d 699.

#### State *vs.*Roger P. Tessier.

OCTOBER 20, 1965.

■Present: Roberts, Paolino and Joslin, JJ.

Joslin, J.

This is a criminal complaint charging that the defendant violated section 11 of chapter 40 of the revised .ordinances of the city of Woonsocket in that on September 11, 1962 he “did behave in a disorderly manner, to *211wit, loud and abusive language * * *. To the annoyance and disturbance of a portion of the peaceable inhabitants of said City * * *.” After a trial to a justice of the superior court sitting without a jury, the defendant was found guilty of the offense as charged. The case is here on a bill of exceptions to that decision and to other rulings made during the trial.

Neither raised before us, nor indeed the subject of an exception, was the question of whether prosecution for the alleged violation is barred for the reason that the ordinance as it appears on the record before us does not fix a penalty.1 That question finds its answer in the hornbook principles that every criminal statute must provide for a penalty and that a conviction for a violation of a statute containing none cannot stand. *State*v. *Pirlot,*20 R. I. 273; *State*v. *Fair Lawn Service Center, Inc.,*20 N. J. 468; 1 Wharton, Criminal Law & Procedure (12th ed.) §10, p. 14. Bishop in his treatise of criminal law (9th ed.) at §6, p. 3, says: “Indeed, law, without punishment for its violation, is in the nature of things impossible.”

Nor can invocation of the doctrine of judicial notice assist the state for that doctrine is unavailable for the ascertainment of whether in fact a sanction can be found in another section of the municipal ordinances. *Tessier*v. *LaNois,*97 R. I. 414, 198 A.2d 142; *Town of Lincoln*v. *Cournoyer,*95 R. I. 280, 186 A.2d 728.

In the circumstances, the interests of justice made it initially the obligation of the superior court and now make it *212the duty of this court to’ dismiss the complaint. *State*v. Kilday, 99 R. I. 209, 206 A.2d 537.

/. *Joseph Nugent,*Attorney General, *Corinne P. Grande,*Special Counsel, for State.

*Aram K. Berberian,*for defendant.

For the reason stated we reverse the decision below without regard to the exceptions briefed and argued and remit the case to the superior court with direction to dismiss the complaint and discharge the defendant.

1

*Footnote No. 1.*“Sec. ill — No person shall revel, use obscene language, quarrel or commit any manner of mischief or otherwise behave in a disorderly manner in any street, highway, gangway, or in any other public place in the city or near any dwelling house or other building therein to the disturbance or annoyance of the peaceful inhabitants thereof or any portion of them, or shall aid, assist, encourage or promote the same to •be done by any other person or persons.”
### §1767. Rights-of-way for Federal departments and agencies

(a) The Secretary concerned may provide under applicable provisions of this subchapter for the use of any department or agency of the United States a right-of-way over, upon, under or through the land administered by him, subject to such terms and conditions as he may impose.

(b) Where a right-of-way has been reserved for the use of any department or agency of the United States, the Secretary shall take no action to terminate, or otherwise limit, that use without the consent of the head of such department or agency.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title V, §507, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2781.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1763 of this title.
#### § 242.14 Mortgage reserve fund.

As a condition of issuing a commitment, HUD shall require establishment of a Mortgage Reserve Fund (MRF). The mortgagor shall be required to make contributions to the MRF such that, with fund earnings, the MRF will build to one year of debt service at 5 years following commencement of amortization, increasing thereafter to 2 years of debt service on and after 10 years following commencement of amortization according to a schedule established by HUD, unless HUD determines that a different schedule of contributions is appropriate based on the mortgagor's risk profile, reimbursement structure, or other characteristics. In particular, hospitals that receive cost-based reimbursement may be required to have MRFs that build to more than 2 years of debt service. Expenditures from the fund are made at HUD's sole discretion or in accordance with the mortgagor's MRF Schedule. Upon termination of insurance, the balance of the MRF shall be returned to the mortgagor, provided that all obligations to HUD have been met.
Form of Common Stock Certificate



  
 Exhibit 4.1


	
	
 

       



  

COMMON STOCK 
 COMMON STOCK 
 NUMBER 

HPI 
 SHARES 
 HORIZON 

PHARMA 
 THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN JERSEY CITY, NJ, NEW YORK, NY 
 AND PITTSBURGH, PA 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 

CUSIP 44047T 10 9 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF

 FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 

CERTIFICATE OF STOCK 
 HORIZON PHARMA, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
 WITNESS the
facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
 Dated:

 Robert Neville 
 EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
 Timothy P. Walbert 
 CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
 HORIZON 
 PHARMA, INC. 
 CORPORATE 

SEAL 
 2010 
 DELAWARE 

© SECURITY-COLUMBIAN UNITED STATES BANKNOTE COMPANY 1960 

COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC 
 BY TRANSFER AGENT
AND REGISTRAR 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 







  

 

 

  
 The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 

TEN COM – as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by the entireties 
 JT
TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–
Custodian 
 (Cust) (Minor) 
 under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 Act 

(State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
 For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 
 Shares of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably 
 constitute and appoint 
 Attorney to transfer the
said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated, 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN 

EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 

SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

November 5, 2013

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2012-1655,-1656

INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

AND INA ACQUISITION CORP.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. (formerly known as BJR 

Trading U.S.A., Inc.)

AND ERIK NIELSEN,

Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellees,

v.

COSMIC-SONDERMASCHINENBAU GMBH,

Third Party Defendant-Appellant.

Decided: September 23, 2013

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change:

Page 1, change “Northern District of Illinois” to

“Northern District of Georgia”.