alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.7


[UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA LOGO]

                                            [ENERGY CAPITAL SERVICES LETTERHEAD]


August 9, 2002


Edge Petroleum Corporation
Edge Petroleum Exploration Company
Edge Petroleum Operating Company, Inc.
2100 Texaco Heritage Plaza
Houston, Texas 77002
Attention: Mr. Mike Long

Gentlemen:

Reference is hereby made to that certain Second Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement in the amount of $25.0 million by and among Edge Petroleum
Corporation, Edge Petroleum Exploration Company and Edge Petroleum Operating
Company, Inc. as Borrowers and Union Bank of California, N.A. as Agent and
Lender dated as of October 6, 2000 (the "Credit Agreement"). All capitalized
terms herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Credit
Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Agent and sole Lender has
redetermined the Borrowing Base and the amount of the monthly Borrowing Base
reduction pursuant to Section 2.10 of the Credit Agreement. Effective
immediately upon your and the Lender's execution of appropriate legal
documentation, the Borrowing Base shall be in the amount of $25.0 million and
the monthly Borrowing Base reduction shall be zero. Both such figures shall be
effective until the next redetermination thereof pursuant to Section 2.10 of
the Credit Agreement.

In addition, Lender has approved the extension of the Maturity Date of the
Facility to October 6, 2004. This will be effective also upon your and the
Lender's execution of appropriate legal documentation.

All other terms and conditions contained in the Credit Agreement remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

Sincerely,


/s/ DAMIEN G. MEIBURGER
---------------------------
    Damien G. Meiburger
   Senior Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2805 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2805

 To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the 
 recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under 
            the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2005

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the 
 recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under 
            the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND 
              ILLNESSES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall revise the 
regulations in part 1904 of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, 
concerning the recording and reporting of occupational injuries and 
illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 
U.S.C. 651 et seq.), to require site-controlling employers to keep a 
site log for all recordable injuries and illnesses occurring among all 
employees on the particular site, whether such employees are employed 
directly by the site-controlling employer or are employed by 
contractors or temporary help or employee leasing services.
    (b) Definition.--As used in this section, the term ``site-
controlling employer'' means the employer that has primary control over 
the work on a particular work site and supervises the employees on a 
day-to-day basis on a particular work site.
                                 <all>
```
146646.14.6000 101025 Quotes from the SJRPP Project
	Fischer, Diane M. 
	to:
	Joe Kordzi
	10/25/2010 03:40 PM
	Cc:
	"Norem, Nancy", "Gannon, Maureen" , "McGuffey, Mack" , "Alvidrez, Richard 
(Miller)" , "Lucas, Kyle J.", "Lawson, Stacy J." , "Chang, Daniel"
	Show Details



History:	This message has been replied to and forwarded.



Joe -
Nancy Norem of PNM has asked me to correspond directly with you regarding 
the link to the St. Johns River Power Park (SJRPP) quotes.  These are 
being sent as a follow up to our October 14 conversation regarding the 
cost estimates for San Juan Station.
 
The quotes can be obtained from the following I-Backup link.
 
Link: https://www3.ibackup.com/qmanager/servlet/share?key=zofze69794 
 
Our system is set up to have the link expire on November 3.  However, this 
is just a security precaution.  If you end up needing more time, please 
let me know and we will reactivate the link.  Also, there is a limit on 
the number of downloads.  If you reach that limit, just let me know that 
also.  We will authorize more. 
 
If you have any questions or problems, please do not hesitate to call me.
 
Regards,
Diane Fischer
Black & Veatch
Air Quality Control Engineer
913-458-7926
fischerdm@bv.com
JOIN

Provision Effective 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 

Extension and Modification of the Health CoverageTax Credit (sunset 12/31/19) [1].................................... cmba 12/31/13 --- -47 -45 -35 -35 -12 --- --- --

Joint Committee on Taxation -------------------------------------- NOTE: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. The date of enactment is assumed to be July 1, 2015.

Fiscal Years 2015 - 2025

[Millions of Dollars] 

ESTIMATED BUDGET EFFECTS OF THE REVENUE PROVISION CONTAINED IN 

SCHEDULED FOR MARKUP BY THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE ON APRIL 22, 2015

A PROPOSAL TO EXTEND THE TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND THE HEALTH COVERAGE TAX 

Legend for "Effective" column: cmba = coverage months beginning after

[1] Estimate includes the following outlay 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 

effects............................................................................................. --- 5 20 28 28 7 --- --- --
### §390vv. Excess crop restrictions

#### (a) Report to Congress on production of surplus crops on acreage served by irrigation water

Within one year of October 12, 1982, the Secretary of Agriculture, with the cooperation of the Secretary of the Interior, shall transmit to the Congress a report on the production of surplus crops on acreage served by irrigation water. The report shall include—

(1) data delineating the production of surplus crops on lands served by irrigation water;

(2) the percentage of participation of farms served by irrigation water in set-aside programs, by acreage, crop, and State;

(3) the feasibility and appropriateness of requiring the participation in acreage set-aside programs of farms served by irrigation water and the costs of such a requirement; and

(4) any recommendations concerning how to coordinate national reclamation policy with agriculture policy to help alleviate recurring problems of surplus crops and low commodity prices.

#### (b) Restrictions prohibiting delivery of irrigation water for production of excess basic agricultural commodities

In addition, notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the case of any Federal reclamation project authorized before October 12, 1982, any restriction prohibiting the delivery of irrigation water for the production of excess basic agricultural commodities shall extend for a period no longer than ten years after the date of the initial authorization of such project.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §222, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1272.)
### §1441. Lease of contiguous public lands for public airports; authority of Secretary of the Interior

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to lease for use as a public airport any contiguous public lands, unreserved and unappropriated, not to exceed two thousand five hundred and sixty acres in area, subject to valid rights in such lands under the public-land laws.

(May 24, 1928, ch. 728, §1, 45 Stat. 728; Aug. 16, 1941, ch. 354, 55 Stat. 621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was previously classified to section 211 of former Title 49, Transportation.

#### Amendments

1941—Act Aug. 16, 1941, increased area of land authorized for lease as airport from six hundred and forty acres to two thousand five hundred and sixty acres.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

                               CEO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 1, 2005

By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     -----------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Salvatore Scarpa and Ralph Spero, Appellants.

Appeal by each defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered June 12, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree, assault in the second degree, and kidnapping; and imposing sentence upon the defendant Scarpa as a second felony offender and upon the defendant Spero as a first offender. Judgment as to both defendants affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### § 229.1120 (Item 1120) Ratings.

Disclose whether the issuance or sale of any class of offered securities is conditioned on the assignment of a rating by one or more rating agencies, whether or not NRSROs. If so, identify each rating agency and the minimum rating that must be assigned. Describe any arrangements to have such rating monitored while the asset-backed securities are outstanding.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModel helicopter rotor high-speed impulsive noise:  Measured acoustics and blade pressuresA 1/17-scale research model of the AH-1 series helicopter main rotor was tested. Model-rotor acoustic and simultaneous blade pressure data were recorded at high speeds where full-scale helicopter high-speed impulsive noise levels are known to be dominant. Model-rotor measurements of the peak acoustic pressure levels, waveform shapes, and directively patterns are directly compared with full-scale investigations, using an equivalent in-flight technique. Model acoustic data are shown to scale remarkably well in shape and in amplitude with full-scale results. Model rotor-blade pressures are presented for rotor operating conditions both with and without shock-like discontinuities in the radiated acoustic waveform. Acoustically, both model and full-scale measurements support current evidence that above certain high subsonic advancing-tip Mach numbers, local shock waves that exist on the rotor blades ""delocalize'' and radiate to the acoustic far-field.Document ID19840001953Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBoxwell, D. A.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Schmitz, F. H.*(Army Aviation Research and Development Command Moffett Field, Calif., United States)*Splettstoesser, W. R.*(DFVLR Brunswick, United States)*Schultz, K. J.*(DFVLR Brunswick, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1983Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-85850USAAVRADCOM-TR-83-A-14NAS 1.15:85850A-9463Accession Number84N10020Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 992-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840001953.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.805 Definitions.

*Applicable surface.* All intact and nonintact interior and exterior painted surfaces of a residential structure.

*Defective paint surface.* Paint on applicable surfaces that is cracking, scaling, chipping, peeling or loose.

*Lead-based paint surface.* A paint surface, whether or not defective, identified as having a lead content greater than or equal to 1 mg/cm2.
### §671. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section, act Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §9, 26 Stat. 1099, prohibited sale of public lands except under certain conditions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-40188 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. EDY GUILMAR CHILEL-SOTO, also known as Edy Chilel Soto-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1801-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing t he judgment in a criminal case, E d y G u i l m a r C h i l e l

- S oto raises

an argument t hat h e correctly concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562 n .28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition f or cert. filed (June 6, 2013) (No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded th a t t h e generic, contemporary definitions of “statutory rape” and “ s e x u a l a buse of a minor” do not include the age-differential r equirement that Chilel-Soto as s e r t s is required. The appellant’s motion for s u m m a r y d i s p o s i t i o n i s GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 15, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-40188 Document: 00512407451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

ROBERT ROBERTSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-1056 SI

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

DEFENDANT EMERSON ELECTRIC

CO.’S CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE

TO ATTEND THE MEDIATION

TELEPHONICALLY

Date: July 13, 2010

Mediator: John Skelton

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request for defendant Emerson Electric Co.’s client

representative, Jackie Greiwe, to be excused from personally attending the July 13, 2010 mediation

session before John Skelton is DENIED. The court finds that Ms. Greiwe has not demonstrated that

her personal attendance at the mediation would “impose an extraordinary or otherwise unjustifiable

hardship” in accordance with ADR L.R. 6-10(d). Accordingly, the court DENIES Ms. Greiwe’s

request to be relieved from compliance with the ADR Local Rules and ORDERS Ms. Greiwe to

appear at the mediation in person.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 1, 2010 By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01056-SC Document 36 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 1
### §122. Discontinuance of land offices by Secretary of the Interior

Whenever the quantity of public land remaining unsold in any land district is reduced to a number of acres less than one hundred thousand, it shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Interior to discontinue the land office of such district; and if any land in any such district remains unsold at the time of the discontinuance of a land office, the same shall be subject to sale at some one of the existing land offices most convenient to the district in which the land office has been discontinued, of which the Secretary of the Interior shall give notice.

(R.S. §2248.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2248 derived from act June 12, 1840, ch. 36, §2, 5 Stat. 385.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Rosenthal-Block China Corporation et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Rosenthal-Porzellan Aktiengesellschaft, Appellant-Respondent, and Porzellanfabrik F. Thomas & Co. et al., Respondents.

Order, entered July 27, 1960, insofar as it grants petitioners-respondents-appellants’ motion to stay arbitration before the American Arbitration Association with respect to Items 1 and 3 of the demand for arbitration, and denies petitioners-respondents-appellants’ motion to stay arbitration before the American Arbitration Association of Item 2 of the demand for arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs. With respect to the supplement to paragraph 5 of the agreement in question this court, in affirming the order of Special Term, holds only that the interpretation and applicability of such supplement is ultimately for the arbitrator. It suffices that there is an issue as to such interpretation and applicability; the court need not and should not determine more. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### PETCHAFT, Respondent, v. ROSENBLUM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Bernard Petchaft against George Rosenblum. H. M. Marks, for appellant. S. Friedlander, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3079 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold 

as part of an educational program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2005 

Mr. PAUL (for himself and Mr. OTTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income amounts received on the sale of animals which are raised and sold as part of an educational 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agriculture Education 

5 Freedom Act’’. 
2 

•HR 3079 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR AMOUNTS 

2 RECEIVED ON SALE OF ANIMALS WHICH ARE 

3 RAISED AND SOLD AS PART OF EDU4 CATIONAL PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap6 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 

7 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

8 by inserting after section 139A the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 139B. PROCEEDS OF SALE OF ANIMALS RAISED AND 

10 SOLD AS PART OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM. 

11 ‘‘In the case of an individual, gross income shall not 

12 include any gain from the sale of any animal which is 

13 raised and sold by such individual as part of such individ14 ual’s participation in— 

15 ‘‘(1) the 4–H program under the Cooperative 

16 State Research, Education, and Extension Service of 

17 the Department of Agriculture, 

18 ‘‘(2) the Future Farmers of America, 

19 ‘‘(3) any program of an organization described 

20 in section 501(c) and exempt from tax under section 

21 501(a) which is similar to such 4–H program or the 

22 Future Farmers of America, or 

23 ‘‘(4) any program of an educational organiza24 tion described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii).’’. 
3 

•HR 3079 IH 

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for such part III is amended by inserting after the item 

3 relating to section 139 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139B. Proceeds of sale of animals raised and sold as part of educational 

program.’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to sales in taxable years ending 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ