Wooden Bedroom Furniture From China

Investigation No. 731--TA--1058 (Final)

Publication 3743 December 2004
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS

Address all communications to

Secretary to the Commission

United States International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436

Fred Fischer, Investigator

William Deese, Economist

Brian Allen, Industry Analyst

Justin Jee, Auditor

Steven Hudgens, Senior Statistician

Lita David-Harris, Statistician

Neal Reynolds, Attorney

George Deyman, Supervisory Investigator

Staff assigned

Robert A. Rogowsky

Director of Operations

Stephen Koplan, Chairman

Deanna Tanner Okun, Vice Chairman

Marcia E. Miller

Jennifer A. Hillman

Charlotte R. Lane

Daniel R. Pearson
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436

Publication 3743 December 2004

www.usitc.gov

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From China

Investigation No. 731--TA--1058 (Final)

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

i

CONTENTS

Page

Determination and views of the Commission ....................................... 1

Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Views of the Commission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Part I: Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1

Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1

Previous investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1

Organization of the report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1

Summary of data presented in the report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-3

The nature and extent of sales at LTFV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-3

Summary of market participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-4

The subject product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-5

Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-5

U.S. tariff treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-8

Domestic like product issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-9

Physical characteristics and uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-9

Common manufacturing facilities and production employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-13

Interchangeability and customer and producer perceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-14

Channels of distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-14

Price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-14

Joinery furniture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-15

Part II: Conditions of competition in the U.S. market ............................... II-1

Market characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1

U.S. supply of domestically produced wooden bedroom furniture ...................... II-4

U.S. supply of imported wooden bedroom furniture ................................. II-5

Subject imports from China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-5

Nonsubject imports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-6

U.S. demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-6

Demand characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-6

Quality tiers ............................................................. II-9

Brand names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-10

Floor space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-10

Substitute products ....................................................... II-11

Consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-11

Substitutability issues ........................................................ II-13

Factors affecting purchases and sales ......................................... II-13

Comparison of domestic products and imports from China ........................ II-14

Comparisons of domestic products and nonsubject imports ........................ II-18

Comparisons of subject imports and nonsubject imports .......................... II-23

Elasticity estimates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-28
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

ii

CONTENTS–Continued

Page

Part III: U.S. producers’ production, shipments, and employment ..................... III-1

U.S. producers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1

U.S. capacity, production, and capacity utilization .................................. III-3

U.S. producers’ shipments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-6

U.S. producers’ purchases ..................................................... III-14

U.S. producers’ inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-18

U.S. employment, wages, and productivity ........................................ III-18

Part IV: U.S. imports, apparent consumption, and market shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1

U.S. importers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1

U.S. imports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1

U.S. importers’ shipments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1

U.S. producers’ imports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-9

Apparent U.S. consumption and U.S. market shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-17

Part V: Pricing and related information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-1

Factors affecting prices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-1

Transportation costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-1

Exchange rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-1

Types of customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-1

Quality tiers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-2

Pricing practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-2

Price data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-3

Price trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-9

Price comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-14

Lost sales and lost revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-25

Lost sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-25

Lost revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-26

Lost sales and lost revenues from the preliminary phase investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-27

Part VI: Financial condition of U.S. producers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-1

Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-1

Operations on wooden bedroom furniture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-1

Capital expenditures and research and development expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-10

Assets and return on investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-10

Capital and investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-12

Part VII: Threat considerations ................................................. VII-1

The industry in China ........................................................ VII-1

U.S. importers’ inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-8

U.S. importers’ current orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII-8

Antidumping duty orders in third-country markets .................................. VII-8
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

iii

CONTENTS–Continued

Page

Appendixes

A. Federal Register notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1

B. Calendar of public hearing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1

C. Summary data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1

D. Selected U.S. producer data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1

E. Selected U.S. importer data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1

F. Selected U.S. purchaser data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1

G. Selected foreign producer data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-1

H. Selected comments of U.S. producers and U.S. purchasers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H-1

I. Alleged effects of imports on U.S. producers’ existing development and production efforts,

growth, investment, ability to raise capital, or the scale of capital investments . . . . . . . . . . I-1

NOTE

Information that would reveal confidential operations of individual concerns may not be published

and therefore has been deleted from this report. Such deletions are indicated by asterisks.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.2(f)).

1

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Final)

WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE FROM CHINA

DETERMINATION

On the basis of the record1

 developed in the subject investigation, the United States International

Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19

U.S.C. § 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in the United States is materially injured by reason of

imports from China of wooden bedroom furniture, provided for in subheadings 9403.50.90 and

7009.92.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the

Department of Commerce (Commerce) to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV).

BACKGROUND

The Commission instituted this investigation effective October 31, 2003, following receipt of a

petition filed with the Commission and Commerce by the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee

for Legal Trade and its individual members; the Cabinet Makers, Millmen, and Industrial Carpenters,

Local 721; the UBC Southern Council of Industrial Workers, Local 2305; the United Steelworkers of 

America, Local 193U; the Carpenters Industrial Union, Local 2093; the Teamsters, Chauffeurs,

Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 991; and the IUE, Industrial Division of the CWA, Local 82472.

The final phase of the investigation was scheduled by the Commission following notification of a

preliminary determination by Commerce that imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China were

being sold at LTFV within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. § 1673b(b)). Notice of

the scheduling of the final phase of the Commission’s investigation and of a public hearing to be held in

connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.

International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register

of July 15, 2004 (69 FR 42452). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on November 9, 2004, and all

persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 The Committee includes such manufacturers as Basset Furniture, Century Furniture, L & J.G. Stickley,

Pennsylvania House, Vaughan-Bassett Furniture, and Vaughan Furniture. The petition contains a list of the

Committee’s members. Petition at Ex. 1. Two original members of the Committee, Cresent and Hooker,

subsequently withdrew from the Committee. 

 2

 The Group includes such retailers of wooden bedroom furniture as The Bombay Company, Crate & Barrel, J.C.

Penney, Marlo Furniture, Pier 1 Imports, Rooms To Go, and Super Stores of America.

 3

 The Committee includes the furniture manufacturers and retailers Aico Furniture, Fine Furniture Design &

Marketing, Kemp Furniture, Legacy Classic Furniture, Magnussen Home, Samuel Lawrence Furniture, Schnadig

Furniture, and Universal Furniture International.

 4

 Furniture Brands manufactures and sells such furniture brands as Lane, Broyhill, Thomasville, Drexel Heritage,

Henredon, and Maitland Smith.

 5

 These exporters and importers include Rui Feng Woodwork, Rui Feng Lumber Development, Naihai Jiantai

Woodwork, Yangchun Hangli Furniture Co., Dorbest Ltd., American Signature Inc., Value City Imports, Value City

Furniture, Master Design and Test Rite, Brstl Inc./Royal Patina, Keller Furniture, Lewis & Son, Powell Company,

Pride Saser Home Furnishings, Trendex Industries, and the Dongguan Lung Dong Group, among others. 

3

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE FROM CHINA

Investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Final)

VIEWS OF THE COMMISSION

Based on the record in this investigation, we find that an industry in the United States is

materially injured by reason of imports of wooden bedroom furniture that are sold in the United States at

less than fair value (“LTFV”).

I. BACKGROUND

 The petition in this investigation was filed on October 31, 2003. The petitioners include the

American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade, an ad hoc association of U.S.

manufacturers of wooden bedroom furniture,1

 and six unions: Local 721 of the Cabinet Makers, Millmen,

and Industrial Carpenters; Local 2305 of the UBC Southern Council of Industrial Workers; Local 193U of

the United Steelworkers of America; Local 2093 of the Carpenters Industrial Union Local; and Local 991

of the Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union; and Local 82472 of the IUE, Industrial

Division of CWA. 

Respondents include the Furniture Retailers of America, an ad hoc association of 35 retailers and

importers of wooden bedroom furniture;2

 the Committee for Free Trade in Furniture, an ad hoc

association of retailers and manufacturers;3

 Furniture Brands International,4 the largest U.S. producer of

wooden bedroom furniture; the Chinese producers and importers Maria Yee Inc., Guangzhou Maria Yee

Furnishings Ltd., and Pyla HK Ltd. (the “Maria Yee Group” or “Maria Yee”); the Chinese producers

Lacquer Craft Manufacturing Co. and Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacturing Co.; and

the Coalition of Certain China Furniture Producers. Several Chinese exporters and U.S. importers of

wooden bedroom furniture entered appearances in the proceeding but did not appear at the hearing or file

briefs with the Commission.5

 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 6 Confidential Staff Report (“CR”) at I-5, III-1 & Table III-1, Public Staff Report (“PR”) at I-4, III-1 & Table III1. The petition identified 125 U.S. producers of wooden bedroom furniture. Petition at Exs. 1 & 2.

 7

 CR at I-5, PR at I-4.

 8

 CR/PR at VII-1, n.4.

 9

 CR/PR at VII-1. The record indicates that China may possess 50,000 furniture makers employing more than 5

million workers. CR at VII-6-7, PR at VII-5.

 10 CR/PR at Table IV-1.

 11 CR/PR at Table VII-1.

 12 CR/PR at Table VII-1.

 13 See, e.g., CR/PR at Tables V-5-V-12 & Figures V-5-V-12.

 14 CR/PR at Table IV-8.

 15 CR/PR at Table IV-8.

 16 CR/PR at Tables III-2, III-4, & VI-1.

 17 CR at IV-10, PR at IV-9.

 18 CR at IV-10; PR at IV-9.

 19 Id.

4

Wooden bedroom furniture (“WBF”) is wooden furniture that is designed and manufactured for

use in the bedroom. WBF includes beds, night stands, chests, armoires, and dressers with mirrors, among

other things. There are a large number of WBF producers in the United States, with more than 50 firms

reporting production of WBF during the period of investigation.6

 The ten largest U.S. producers

accounted for approximately 56 percent of U.S. producer shipments in 2003.7

 

There are also a large number of producers of wooden bedroom furniture in China. The petition

identified 133 Chinese producers and exporters of wooden bedroom furniture8

 and the Commission

received foreign producer responses from 154 Chinese producers of WBF.9

 China was the largest source

of imported WBF during the period of investigation, accounting for 50.2 percent of WBF imports in

2003.10 Chinese production capacity for WBF grew considerably during the POI, more than doubling

(based on pieces) between 2001 and 2003.11 Capacity in China is projected to increase by *** percent

from 2003 to 2004 and by an additional *** percent from 2004 to 2005.12

Subject imports of WBF entered the U.S. market during the period of investigation in rapidly

increasing volumes and were consistently priced below the domestic merchandise.13 Due to underselling

by subject imports, the domestic industry lost 15.3 percentage points of market share to the subject

imports by 2003.14 The industry also lost 7.0 percentage points of market share to lower-priced subject

imports between interim 2003 and interim 2004.15 This lost market share and consistent underselling by

subject imports occurred at the same time that the industry’s production, shipment, sales and profitability

levels all fell significantly.16 

Members of the domestic industry were themselves importers of a substantial volume of subject

imports during the period,17 but their share of total imports remained essentially stable throughout the

POI.18 Accordingly, importers who were not domestic producers accounted for the large majority of

subject imports, as well as the bulk of the increases in subject volumes, during the period of

investigation.19 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 20 19 U.S.C. § 1677(4)(A).

 21 Id.

 22 19 U.S.C. § 1677(10).

 23 See, e.g., NEC Corp. v. Department of Commerce, 36 F. Supp.2d 380, 383 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1998); Nippon Steel

Corp. v. United States, 19 CIT 450, 455 (1995); Torrington Co. v. United States, 747 F. Supp. 744, 749 n.3 (Ct. Int’l

Trade 1990), aff’d, 938 F.2d 1278 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (“every like product determination ‘must be made on the

particular record at issue’ and the ‘unique facts of each case’”). The Commission generally considers a number of

factors including: (1) physical characteristics and uses; (2) interchangeability; (3) channels of distribution;

(4) customer and producer perceptions of the products; (5) common manufacturing facilities, production processes,

and production employees; and, where appropriate, (6) price. See Nippon, 19 CIT at 455, n.4; Timken Co. v. 

United States, 913 F. Supp. 580, 584 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1996).

 24 See, e.g., S. Rep. No. 96-249, at 90-91 (1979).

 25 Nippon Steel, 19 CIT at 455; Torrington, 747 F. Supp. at 748-49; see also S. Rep. No. 96-249, at 90-91 (1979)

(Congress has indicated that the domestic like product standard should not be interpreted in “such a narrow fashion

as to permit minor differences in physical characteristics or uses to lead to the conclusion that the product and article

are not ‘like’ each other, nor should the definition of ‘like product’ be interpreted in such a fashion as to prevent

consideration of an industry adversely affected by the imports under consideration”).

 26 Hosiden Corp. v. Advanced Display Mfrs., 85 F.3d 1561, 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1996) (Commission may find single

domestic like product corresponding to several different classes or kinds defined by Commerce); Torrington,

747 F. Supp. at 748-52 (affirming Commission’s determination of six domestic like products in investigations where

Commerce found five classes or kinds).

5

II. DOMESTIC LIKE PRODUCT

To determine whether an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with

material injury by reason of imports of the subject merchandise, the Commission first defines the

“domestic like product” and the “industry.”20 Section 771(4)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended

(“the Act”), defines the relevant domestic industry as the “producers as a [w]hole of a domestic like

product, or those producers whose collective output of a domestic like product constitutes a major

proportion of the total domestic production of the product.”21 In turn, the Act defines “domestic like

product” as “a product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses

with, the article subject to an investigation.”22

The decision regarding the appropriate domestic like product(s) in an investigation is a factual

determination, and the Commission has applied the statutory standard of “like” or “most similar in

characteristics and uses” on a case-by-case basis.23 No single factor is dispositive, and the Commission

may consider other factors it deems relevant based on the facts of a particular investigation.24 The

Commission looks for clear dividing lines among possible like products, and disregards minor

variations.25 Although the Commission must accept the determination of the Department of Commerce

(“Commerce”) as to the scope of the imported merchandise sold at less than fair value, the Commission

determines what domestic product is like the imported articles that Commerce has identified.26
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 27 69 Fed. Reg. 67314 (November 17, 2004) (footnotes deleted).

 28 69 Fed. Reg. at 67314. Commerce also excluded from the scope any bedroom furniture “made primarily of

wicker, cane, osier, bamboo or rattan,” or “in which bentwood parts predominate,” metal side rails for beds if they

are sold separately from the head and footboard, jewelry armories, cheval mirrors, and certain metal parts. 69 Fed.

Reg. at 67314.

 29 CR at I-11; PR at I-9-11.

 30 CR at I-11; PR at I-9.

6

A. Product Description

In its final determination, Commerce defined the imported merchandise within the scope of these

investigations as “wooden bedroom furniture.” As defined in the scope, wooden bedroom furniture is:

generally, but not exclusively, designed, manufactured, and offered for sale in coordinated

groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the individual pieces are of approximately the same style

and approximately the same material and/or finish. The subject merchandise is made

substantially of wood products, including both solid wood and also engineered wood products

made from wood particles, fibers, or other wooden materials such as plywood, oriented strand

board, particle board, and fiberboard, with or without wood veneers, wood overlays, or laminates,

with or without non-wood components or trim such as metal, marble, leather, glass, plastic, or

other resins, and whether or not assembled, completed, or finished.

The subject merchandise includes . . . (1) wooden beds, such as loft beds, bunk beds, and other

beds; (2) wooden headboards for beds (whether stand alone or attached to side rails), wooden

footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds; (3) night tables,

night stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, bachelor’s chests,

lingerie chests, wardrobes, vanities, chessers, chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; (4)

dressers with framed glass mirrors that are attached to, incorporated in, sit on, or hang over the

dresser; (5) chests-on-chests, highboys, lowboys, chests of drawers, chests, door chests,

chiffoniers, hutches, and armoires; (6) desks, computer stands, filing cabinets, book cases, or

writing tables that are attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise; and (7) other

bedroom furniture consistent with the above list.27

Commerce excluded from the scope of this investigation several types of wooden furniture that

may be used in a bedroom, such as “seats, chairs, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, stools and other

seating furniture,” “mattresses, mattress supports (including box springs), infant cribs, water beds, and

futon frames,” “office furniture, such as desks, stand-up desks, computer cabinets, filing cabinets,

credenzas, and bookcases,” “dining room or kitchen furniture, such as dining tables, chairs, servers,

sideboards, buffets, corner cabinets, china cabinets, and china hutches,” and “other non-bedroom

furniture, such as television cabinets, cocktail tables, end tables, occasional tables, wall systems, book

cases, and entertainment systems.”28

WBF is wooden furniture designed and manufactured for use in the bedroom. It includes such

items of wooden furniture as beds, nightstands, chests, armoires, and dressers with mirrors. Although

these items of furniture have differing physical characteristics and end uses, they generally are designed

and offered for sale in coordinated groups and share the same basic design, finish, and construction.29

WBF is used primarily in residences, lodging, and long-term care facilities, such as assisted living

facilities.30
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 31 Petition at 20; Petitioners Postconference Brief at Ex. 1, p. 5; Lacquer Craft Postconference Brief at pp. 7-12.

 32 Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China, Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Preliminary), USITC Pub. 3667 (January

2004) at 8-9 (“Prelim. Det.”).

 33 Prelim. Det. at 8-9. 

 34 Wooden bedroom suites also can be referred to as bedroom collections, bedroom groups, or bedrooms.

 35 Prelim. Det. at 9-10.

 36 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 7-14.

 37 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 8.

 38 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 8-9.

 39 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 9-10.

 40 Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 7-13.

 41 Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 9-10.

7

B. Analysis and Finding

1. Preliminary Determination

In the preliminary phase of this investigation, both petitioners and respondents agreed that we

should find that there is one domestic like product, consisting of all WBF.31 In our preliminary

determination, we found that all WBF constituted one domestic like product.32 While we acknowledged

that individual items of WBF – such as beds, nightstands, and dressers – were not fully interchangeable

for one another because they do not share the exact same physical characteristics and uses, we also found

that all of the individual items of WBF share the same broad physical characteristics and end uses in that

they are items of wooden furniture designed and manufactured for use in a bedroom.33 We further found

that WBF generally is designed, manufactured, and sold in coordinated groups called bedroom “suites,”34

that it is sold primarily to retailers in the United States, that it is produced using the same production

processes on the same production lines, and that it generally is perceived by market participants to be a

single product category.35 

2. Parties’ Arguments

In this final phase of this investigation, petitioners again argue there is one domestic like product

in this investigation, consisting of all WBF.36 Petitioners assert that all items of WBF are designed,

manufactured, distributed, marketed, and sold as bedroom suites.37 They contend that industry

participants do not view the individual items within the WBF category as separate and distinct products

and that the physical characteristics and end uses of these items are broadly similar.38 They also argue

that most WBF is sold in similar channels of distribution (i.e., to retailers), and that all items of WBF are

produced on the same manufacturing lines using the same employees and production processes.39

Generally, respondents do not challenge petitioners’ proposed domestic like product. However,

one respondent group, the Maria Yee Group, argues that “joinery” WBF should be considered a different

domestic like product than other types of WBF.40 According to the Maria Yee Group, “joinery” WBF –

which is made entirely of solid wood and uses no fasteners (such as nails or screws) in its construction –

is more durable, more attractive, and more expensive than non-joinery WBF.41 Maria Yee asserts that the

production process for joinery WBF is more labor-intensive than the process used to produce non-joinery
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 42 Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 11-12.

 43 Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 12-13.

 44 Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 12-13; Tr. at 226 (Mr. Zaucha).

 45 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 10-11.

 46 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 11.

 47 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 11-12.

 48 Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 11-14.

 49 Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 1.

 50 CR at I-7-8, PR at I-5-7.

 51 CR at I-14, PR at I-11.

 52 See, e.g., CR/PR at Figures I-1, I-2, I-3 & I-4. 

 53 Id. 

 54 Domestic Producer’s Questionnaire Response of ***, Question II-30. Although Maria Yee’s customers Crate

& Barrel and Room & Board testified at the hearing that their retail customers perceived there to be a significant

difference between joinery and non-joinery WBF, Tr. at 229-231, other producers and importers who have

familiarity with the products assert that they are fully interchangeable with each other once assembled. Domestic

(continued...)

8

WBF,42 and that joinery WBF is therefore more expensive than other forms of WBF.43 Maria Yee asserts

that joinery WBF is sold only to high-end resellers of WBF, such as Crate & Barrel and Room & Board.44

Petitioners argue in response that there is no clear dividing line between joinery and non-joinery

WBF.45 Petitioners argue that, once assembled, joinery WBF has the exact same physical characteristics

and end uses as other types of WBF and that the only difference between the products is the manner in

which joinery WBF is physically joined together.46 Petitioners argue that joinery WBF and non-joinery

WBF are interchangeable and there is no record evidence indicating a strong purchaser preference for

joinery WBF.47 Finally, petitioners contend, producer and importer responses to the Commission’s

questionnaires indicate that there are more similarities than differences between joinery and non-joinery

furniture.48

3. Joinery WBF is Part of the Same Domestic Like Product as Other

Types of WBF

On the basis of the record as a whole, we do not find joinery WBF to be a different domestic like

product than other forms of WBF. First, there are not significant physical and end use differences

between joinery and non-joinery WBF. Although Maria Yee emphasizes that joinery furniture is

physically distinguished from other forms of WBF because it is made of solid wood and uses no fasteners

in its assembly process,49 one of the critical distinguishing characteristics of the products covered by the

scope is that they are made substantially of wood and wood products.50 In addition, other high-end forms

of WBF are manufactured solely or primarily from solid wood, as is joinery furniture.51

Furthermore, although joinery WBF is, in one sense, distinguished from non-joinery furniture

because it is assembled without fasteners, joinery WBF, once assembled, has the same basic physical

appearance and is used for the same basic purposes as other forms of WBF.52 In fact, domestic producers

and importers who have familiarity with joinery products report that joinery WBF is “all but

indistinguishable” from other forms of high-quality WBF.53 Given this, we find that joinery and nonjoinery furniture share similar characteristics and uses and are interchangeable for one another.54
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 54 (...continued)

Producer’s Questionnaire Responses of *** and *** at Question II-30; Importer’s Questionnaire Responses of ***

and *** at Question II-16.

 55 See CR at I-14-16 & I-18-23. 

 56 For example, Maria Yee sells its joinery furniture to Crate & Barrel and Room & Board, both large retailers. 

Hearing Transcript at 229-231.

 57 The average unit values for Maria Yee’s joinery furniture were $*** in 2001, $*** in 2002, and $*** in 2003. 

Maria Yee Importers’ Questionnaire. These unit values are well within the range of the domestic unit prices

reported for the price comparison products 1-A, 1-B, 2-A, and 2-B. CR/PR at Tables V-5, V-6, V-9, & V-10.

 58 Maria Yee argues in the alternative that the Commission has the authority to exclude joinery furniture from its

affirmative injury determination on the grounds that it is a niche product and does not injure any member of the

industry. Maria Yee Prehearing Brief at 4-7. However, the Commission has consistently rejected arguments that it

has the authority to “exclude” an article from the scope of an antidumping or countervailing duty investigation. 

Certain Cold Rolled Steel Products from Australia et al., Inv. Nos. 731-TA-965, -971-72, -979, -980 (Final), USITC

Pub. 3536 (Sept. 2002) at 10, n. 31; Certain Cold Rolled Steel Products from Australia et al., Inv. Nos. 731-TA-965,

971, 972, 979, and 980 (Preliminary), USITC Pub. 3437 (Nov. 2001) at 5, & n.20. 

 59 19 U.S.C. § 1677(4)(A).

 60 See United States Steel Group v. United States, 873 F. Supp. 673, 681-84 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1994), aff’d, 96 F. 3d

1352 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

9

Moreover, although there are production differences between joinery WBF and other forms of

WBF, they are not significant enough to warrant treating joinery WBF as a different domestic like

product than other WBF. While Maria Yee asserts the production process for joinery furniture is laborintensive and involves significant amounts of hand work during the assembly process, most WBF,

including high-end forms of WBF, is assembled into its final form by hand.55 In addition, like most nonjoinery WBF, joinery WBF is marketed and sold to furniture retailers, such as Crate & Barrel and Room

& Board.56 Finally, the record evidence with respect to pricing indicates that average unit values for

joinery WBF are not significantly different than the range of prices reported for the domestic price

comparison products.57

On the whole, while there may be some physical and production differences between joinery and

non-joinery WBF, we do not conclude that they are significant enough to warrant finding that joinery and

non-joinery furniture are different domestic like products. The record indicates that joinery and nonjoinery WBF have the same basic physical characteristics and end uses, are interchangeable for one

another, undergo somewhat similar production processes, and are sold at comparable price levels in

similar channels of distribution. Joinery furniture is simply part of the continuum of products comprising

WBF. Given this, we find there is one domestic like product in this final phase investigation, consisting

of both joinery and non-joinery forms of WBF.58

III. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY AND RELATED PARTIES

The domestic industry is defined as “producers as a [w]hole of a domestic like product, or those

producers whose collective output of a domestic like product constitutes a major proportion of the total

domestic production of the product.”59 In defining the domestic industry, the Commission’s general

practice has been to include in the industry all domestic production of the domestic like product, whether

toll-produced, captively consumed, or sold in the domestic merchant market.60 We find the domestic

industry to include all U.S. producers of WBF.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 61 19 U.S.C. § 1677(4)(B).

 62 19 U.S.C. § 1677(4)(B).

 63 Sandvik AB v. United States, 721 F. Supp. 1322, 1331-32 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1989), aff’d without opinion, 904

F.2d 46 (Fed. Cir. 1990); Empire Plow Co. v. United States, 675 F. Supp. 1348, 1352 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1987). The

primary factors the Commission has examined in deciding whether appropriate circumstances exist to exclude the

related parties include: (1) the percentage of domestic production attributable to the importing producer; (2) the

reason the U.S. producer has decided to import the product subject to investigation, i.e., whether the firm benefits

from the LTFV sales or subsidies or whether the firm must import in order to enable it to continue production and

compete in the U.S. market; and (3) the position of the related producers vis-a-vis the rest of the industry, i.e.,

whether inclusion or exclusion of the related party will skew the data for the rest of the industry. See, e.g.,

Torrington Co. v. United States, 790 F. Supp. 1161, 1168 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1992), aff’d without opinion, 991 F.2d 809

(Fed. Cir. 1993). The Commission has also considered the ratio of import shipments to U.S. production for related

producers and whether the primary interests of the related producers lie in domestic production or in importation. 

See, e.g., Melamine Institutional Dinnerware from China, Indonesia, and Taiwan, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-741-743 (Final),

USITC Pub. 3016 (Feb. 1997) at 14, n.81.

 64 Petitioners’ Postconference Brief at Ex. 1, pp. 20-23.

 65 Petitioners’ Postconference Brief at Ex. 1, pp. 20-23. 

 66 Petitioners’ Postconference Brief at Ex. 1, pp. 20-23. 

 67 Lacquer Craft Postconference Brief at pp. 12-14; Furniture Retailers Group Postconference Brief at p. 2, n.2.

 68 Prelim. Det. at 12-14.

 69 Prelim. Det. at 12-13.

 70 Prelim. Det. at 12-13.

10

Petitioners contend that the Commission should find that appropriate circumstances exist to

exclude two domestic producers of WBF – *** and *** – from the domestic industry as related parties

under section 771(4)(B) of the Act.61 Section 771(4)(B) allows the Commission, if appropriate

circumstances exist, to exclude producers from the domestic industry that are related to an exporter or

importer of subject merchandise or which are themselves importers.62 Exclusion of a related or importing

producer is within the Commission’s discretion based upon the facts presented in each case.63

1. The Preliminary Determination

During the preliminary phase of the investigation, petitioners argued that the Commission should

exclude *** and *** from the domestic industry as related parties.64 They stated that both companies

opposed the petition and that they imported significant and increasing volumes of subject WBF during the

period of investigation.65 They also argued that both companies benefitted significantly from importing

during the POI.66 Respondents argued that no domestic producers of wooden bedroom furniture should

be excluded from the industry as related parties simply because they imported subject merchandise.67

In our preliminary determination, we found that appropriate circumstances did not exist to

exclude these two companies from the industry,68 noting that both companies produced more merchandise

domestically than they imported and that neither company benefitted disproportionately from importing

when compared to the rest of the industry.69 We also noted that it had become common for members of

the WBF industry to import subject merchandise to supplement their domestic production.70
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 71 Petitioners’ Posthearing Brief at Att. 1, p.1-4.

 72 Petitioners’ Posthearing Brief at Att. 1, p.1-4.

 73 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 21.

 74 CR/PR at Tables I-2 & III-1.

 75 CR/PR at Table D-4.

 76 CR/PR at Table D-4.

 77 CR/PR at Table IV-6.

 78 CR/PR at Table VI-5.

 79 CR/PR at Table III-1.

 80 CR/PR at Tables III-3, IV-5 & IV-6.

11

2. Parties’ Arguments

In the final phase of this investigation, petitioners again argue that *** and *** should be

excluded from the industry because they opposed the petition and have imported increasingly significant

volumes of subject imports during the period of investigation.71 They also argue that the operating

margins of both companies were *** than the industry as a whole during the period, thus indicating that

both companies *** from importing subject merchandise during this time.72 Respondents argue the

Commission should not exclude any producer from the domestic industry because “virtually all major

U.S. producers import themselves.”73 

3. Analysis and Finding 

Although both *** and *** import subject merchandise and are therefore related parties, we find

that appropriate circumstances do not exist to exclude either company from the domestic industry. 

Accordingly, we find that the domestic industry includes all U.S. producers of WBF.

a. ***

*** was the *** largest U.S. shipper of WBF in 2003 and accounted for *** percent of all

reported domestically produced U.S. shipments in that year.74 *** imported a substantial and growing

volume of subject imports during the period of investigation, importing $*** million worth of WBF from

China in 2001, $*** million in 2002, and $*** million in 2003.75 ***’s importation of subject

merchandise also increased during the interim periods, growing from $*** million in interim 2003 to

$*** million in interim 2004.76 As a percentage of its domestic production (in pieces), ***’s imports of

subject merchandise grew from *** percent of production in 2001 to *** percent in 2002, *** percent in

2003, and *** percent in interim 2004.77 ***’s operating income margins were *** percent in 2001, ***

percent in 2002, *** percent in 2003, and *** percent in interim 2004.78 *** opposes the petition.79

Although *** opposes the petition and has imported a growing volume of subject imports during

the period, we do not find that appropriate circumstances exist to exclude the company from the industry. 

First, *** was one of the largest domestic producers of WBF throughout the period of investigation and

has produced and shipped considerably more domestically produced WBF in the United States than it

imported from China throughout the period of investigation.80 Given this, it would appear that ***

primary interest continued to remain in domestic production rather than in importation during the period

of investigation. In fact, we note that two members of the petitioning group, *** and ***, both imported
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 81 The ratio of ***’s imports of subject merchandise to domestic production was, for example, *** percent in

2003 and *** percent in interim 2004, while the ratio of ***’s imports of subject merchandise to domestic

production was *** percent in 2003 and *** percent in interim 2004. CR/PR at Table IV-6.

 82 CR/PR at Table VI-5.

 83 The industry’s operating income margins were 4.7 percent in 2001, 4.6 percent in 2002, 2.5 percent in 2003,

and 3.2 percent in interim 2004. CR/PR at Table VI-1.

 84 CR/PR at Tables VI-4 & VI-5. 

 85 ***. CR/PR at Table VI-4. 

 86 CR/PR at Table III-3.

 87 CR/PR at Tables I-2 & III-1.

 88 CR/PR at Table IV-5.

 89 CR/PR at Table IV-5.

 90 CR/PR at Table IV-6.

 91 CR/PR at Table VI-5.

 92 CR/PR at Table III-1.

12

a much higher volume of subject imports relative to their domestic production than *** did in both 2003

and interim 2004.81

Moreover, the record does not indicate that *** benefitted disproportionately from importing the

subject merchandise when compared with the rest of the industry. As indicated above, ***’s operating

income margins ranged between *** percent and *** percent during the POI.82 Although these operating

margins were higher than the domestic industry’s average operating income levels during the period of

investigation,83 there was a wide range of operating results with respect to individual producers84 and

seven of the seventeen domestic producers that did not import subject merchandise during the period had

operating margins that were comparable to or higher than *** during the period.85 Given this, it does not

appear that *** benefitted disproportionately from its importation of subject merchandise as compared to

other members of the industry.

Finally, because *** financial results are not disproportionately different from those of other

domestic producers and because *** accounted for *** percent of domestic production in 2003,86 we do

not find that inclusion of *** financial and trade data would significantly skew the industry’s overall

financial or trade data. Accordingly, we do not find appropriate circumstances to exclude *** from the

domestic industry.

b. ***

*** was the *** largest U.S. shipper of WBF in 2003 and accounted for *** percent of all

domestically produced U.S. shipments in that year.87 *** imported substantial volumes of subject imports

during the period, importing $*** million worth of WBF from China in 2001, $*** million in 2002, and

$*** million in 2003.88 *** imported $*** million of subject merchandise in interim 2003 and $***

million in interim 2004.89 *** imports of subject merchandise were equivalent to a substantial percentage

of its domestic production (in pieces) during the period, equaling *** percent of production in 2001, ***

percent in 2002, *** percent in 2003, and *** percent in interim 2004.90 *** operating income margins

were *** percent in 2001, *** percent in 2002, *** percent in 2003, and *** percent in interim 2004.91

*** opposes the petition.92
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 93 CR/PR at Tables III-3, IV-5 & IV-6.

 94 CR/PR at Table IV-6.

 95 CR/PR at Table VI-5.

 96 The industry’s operating income margins were 4.7 percent in 2001, 4.6 percent in 2002, 2.5 percent in 2003,

and 3.2 percent in interim 2004. CR/PR at Table VI-1.

 97 CR/PR at Tables VI-4 & VI-5. 

 98 ***. CR at Table VI-4. 

 99 CR/PR at Table III-3.

 100 No party argued for the exclusion from the industry of any producer other than *** and ***. Nonetheless, we

also examined the data concerning the twenty-four other producers who imported subject merchandise during the

period of investigation and find that appropriate circumstances do not exist to exclude any of these producers from

the industry as a related party.

13

Although *** opposes the petition and imported substantial volumes of subject imports during

the period, we do not find that appropriate circumstances exist to exclude the company from the industry. 

First, *** was one of the largest domestic producers of WBF during the period of investigation and

continued to produce and ship considerably more domestically produced WBF in the United States than it

imported from China during the period of investigation.93 Moreover, as a percentage of its domestic

production, *** actually imported a decreasing amount of subject imports into the United States in 2003

and interim 2004, with its imports of subject merchandise declining from *** percent of its domestic

production in 2002 to *** percent in 2003 and then to *** percent in interim 2004.94 Thus, it appears

that *** primary focus was on domestic production rather than importation of the subject merchandise

during the period of investigation.

Moreover, the record does not indicate that *** benefitted disproportionately from importing the

subject merchandise when compared with the rest of the industry. ***’s operating income margins

ranged between *** percent and *** percent during the POI.95 Although these operating income margins

were higher than the domestic industry’s average operating income levels during the period of

investigation,96 the record also shows there was a wide range of operating results within individual

members of the industry97 and that seven of the seventeen domestic producers that did not import subject

merchandise during the period had comparable or higher operating income margins during the period of

investigation.98 Given this, we find that *** did not benefit disproportionately from its importation of

subject merchandise when compared to other members of the industry who did not import subject

merchandise. 

Finally, because *** financial results are not disproportionately different from those of other

domestic producers and because *** accounted for *** percent of domestic production in 2003,99 we do

not find that inclusion of *** financial and trade data would significantly skew the industry’s overall

financial or trade data. Accordingly, we do not find appropriate circumstances to exclude *** from the

domestic industry.

As a result, we define the domestic industry to include all U.S. producers of the domestic like

product.100
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 101 We find that subject imports from China are not negligible under 19 U.S.C. § 1677(24). CR/PR at Table IV-2.

 102 We find that the captive production provision does not apply in this investigation because the domestic

producers did not internally transfer significant production of the domestic product for the production of a

downstream product. 19 U.S.C. 1677(7)(C)(iv). The domestic industry internally consumed or transferred to related

companies no more than *** percent of its total shipments during the period of investigation. CR/PR at Table III-4.

 103 CR at II-9, PR at II-6.

 104 CR at II-9-11 & II-37, PR at II-6-8 & II-28.

 105 CR at II-11, PR at II-8. In this regard, twenty-seven of the sixty-seven purchasers providing usable comments

regarding the effect of subject WBF on aggregate U.S. demand, Purchasers’ Questionnaires, Question III-3.c.,

reported that the presence of imports from China had not significantly affected overall U.S. demand for wooden

bedroom furniture. Three purchasers reported that imports from China had reduced demand for U.S.-produced

wooden bedroom furniture and increased the demand for the subject imported product. Twenty-three purchasers

reported that overall demand had increased as a result of imports from China, while two reported that the volume of

sales increased. Ten purchasers reported that imports from China had provided more styles or better quality at a

similar price and thus provided a better value to consumers.

 106 Petitioners Prehearing Brief, Ex. 9.

 107 CR/PR at Table C-1.

 108 We have relied primarily on value data when analyzing volume and market share trends because quantitybased data are not available for certain categories of official import data. The parties agree that value data are best

for assessing such issues as apparent consumption and import and domestic market share. See Tr. at 162-63; Tr. of

Preliminary Staff Conference at 201-202. However, we also recognize that the use of value data for market share

calculations may understate actual import volume to the extent it reflects less than fair value sales of WBF. 

14

IV. MATERIAL INJURY BY REASON OF LESS THAN FAIR VALUE IMPORTS101

A. Conditions of Competition102

Several conditions of competition are pertinent to our analysis.

1. Demand Conditions

Demand for WBF is affected by changes in the housing market, consumer tastes, personal income

levels, and demographics.103 Generally, demand for WBF is moderately responsive to price changes in

the market, primarily because of the discretionary nature of the retail customer’s decision on whether to

purchase WBF.104 Nonetheless, a substantial number of purchasers reported that the presence of lowpriced subject imports from China did not significantly affect overall demand for WBF in the U.S.

market.105 Moreover, the record indicates that demand for WBF, as measured by apparent consumption,

has tracked housing starts and new home sales during the POI,106 indicating that growth in demand during

the POI has been affected primarily by changes in the housing market rather than by the increased

presence of low-priced subject imports from China.

Apparent U.S. consumption of WBF grew during the period of investigation, increasing by 13.2

percent between 2001 and 2003, and by an additional 12.0 percent between interim 2003 and 2004.107

Measured by value,108 apparent U.S. consumption increased from $4.1 billion in 2001 to $4.5 billion in
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 109 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1.

 110 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1.

 111 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1.

 112 Hospitality sector firms include hotels, motels, retirement homes, and assisted care facilities.

 113 CR/PR at Tables IV-4 & III-7.

 114 CR/PR at Tables IV-4 & III-7.

 115 CR/PR at Tables IV-4 & III-7.

 116 CR at I-17 & II-16, PR at I-14 & II-10-11; see also Public Staff Report (Preliminary) at II-3 & II-4.

 117 CR at I-17, PR at I-14; Tr. at 32 (Mr. Wentworth), 42 (Mr. W. Bassett), 105 (Mr. J. Bassett); Prelim. Det. at II3 & II-4.

 118 CR at I-14, PR at I-11.

 119 CR I-14, PR at I-11.

 120 Preliminary Staff Report at V-5.

 121 We note that staff estimates that the elasticity of substitution between the domestic and imported Chinese

wooden bedroom furniture ranges from 3 to 6, suggesting a moderate to high degree of substitutability between the

domestic and imported subject products. CR at II-38, PR at II-28.

 122 CR at I-16, PR at I-14.

15

2002.109 It then increased to $4.7 billion in 2003.110 Apparent U.S. consumption was also higher in

interim 2004 (at $2.5 billion) than in interim 2003 ($2.2 billion).111

The large majority of wooden bedroom furniture is sold by producers and importers to furniture

retailers in the U.S. market, with smaller amounts being sold to “hospitality/institutional” firms,112

distributors, and other firms in the market.113 Approximately 91.8 percent of all domestic shipments of

WBF and 87.8 percent of subject import shipments in 2003 (by value) were sold to furniture retailers.114

Much smaller amounts were sold to hospitality/institutional firms, distributors, and other firms in the

market during 2003.115

U.S. furniture retailers generally display wooden bedroom furniture in designated retail areas,

called “slots,” on their display floor.116 Access to these retail display slots is a critical aspect of a

supplier’s ability to sell WBF through the retailer to the retail customer.117 Accordingly, the gain or loss

of “slots” at any retailer can affect the overall volume of merchandise shipped by a producer or an

importer.

The market for wooden bedroom furniture can be divided generally into three quality or pricing

levels: a low-priced segment, a medium-priced segment, and a high-end segment.118 The quality or

pricing category of a particular bedroom furniture suite is determined by the quality of its materials,

construction and finish.119 Although most market participants agree that the market is comprised of

furniture within these three quality segments, there is no consistent definition within the industry of the

furniture quality or pricing that characterizes each segment.120

2. Substitutability and Purchase Factors

The record indicates that there is a moderate to high degree of substitutability between domestic

wooden bedroom furniture and the subject imports.121 The subject imports are similar in style and design

features to the domestic merchandise.122 A substantial majority of purchasers report that the domestic and
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 123 CR at II-23, PR at II-14. Forty-four of seventy-three responding purchasers reported that domestic and subject

merchandise are always or frequently used interchangeably. Id. Fifteen purchasers reported that they are sometimes

used interchangeably. Id. 

 124 CR/PR at Table II-7. The subject imports were rated as being superior to the domestic merchandise with

respect to “lowest price” by the large majority of purchasers, while the domestic merchandise was rated as being

superior to the subject merchandise with respect to “delivery times” and “brand names” by a majority of purchasers. 

Id.

 125 CR/PR at Table II-4.

 126 CR/PR at Table II-3.

 127 CR at I-5, III-1 & Table III-1, PR at I-4, III-1 & Table III-1. 

 128 CR at I-5, PR at I-4.

 129 CR/PR at Table III-1.

 130 CR at II-5-6, PR at II-4.

 131 CR at II-5-6, PR at II-4.

 132 CR/PR at Tables III-2 & C-1. The industry’s production capacity fell by 1.8 percent between interim periods. 

Id.

 133 CR/PR at Tables III-2 & C-1. The industry’s production quantity fell by 2.6 between interim 2003 and interim

2004. Id. 

 134 CR/PR at Tables III-2 & C-1. The industry’s production and related workers fell by an additional 11.5 percent

between interim periods. Id.

16

subject merchandise are always or frequently used interchangeably.123 Further, most purchasers rated the

domestic and subject merchandise as being comparable to one another on a variety of factors affecting the

purchase decision, except for lowest price, delivery times and brand names.124

The record also indicates that price is an important factor in the purchase decision for wooden

bedroom furniture, with the large majority of responding purchasers reporting that “lowest price” is a

very important factor in their purchase decision.125 Similarly, the large majority of responding purchasers

reported that price was either the first or second most important factor in their purchase decision.126

3. Supply

There are a large number of WBF producers in the United States, with more than 50 firms

reporting production of this furniture during the period of investigation.127 The ten largest U.S. producers

accounted for approximately 56 percent of U.S. producer shipments in 2003.128 Only four of the ten

largest producers, ***, accounted individually for more than five percent of the industry’s shipments in

2003, however.129 

The domestic WBF industry is a high variable-cost industry, that is, an industry in which unit raw

materials, labor and other variable costs are high relative to its unit fixed costs.130 An industry with high

variable and low fixed costs, such as this one, can be expected to respond to changes in demand for its

products by reducing capacity, production and employment levels.131 Between 2001 and 2003, the

industry’s total production capacity fell by 2.9 percent,132 its production levels declined by 9.1 percent,133

and the number of its production-related workers decreased by 19.9 percent.134 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 135 CR/PR at VII-1, n.4.

 136 CR/PR at VII-1. The record indicates that China may possess 50,000 furniture makers employing more than 5

million workers. CR at VII-6-7, PR at VII-5.

 137 CR/PR at Table IV-1.

 138 CR/PR at Table VII-1.

 139 CR/PR at Table VII-1.

 140 CR/PR at Table IV-8. 

 141 CR/PR at Table IV-8.

 142 CR/PR at Table IV-2.

 143 CR at IV-10, PR at IV-9.

 144 CR at IV-10; PR at IV-9.

 145 CR/PR at Table IV-5 & Figure IV-4.

 146 CR/PR at Table III-1.

 147 CR/PR at Tables III-1 & D-2; E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, dated Dec. 9, 2004 at Supplemental Table 1. 

Three producers that support the petition did not report data. Id.

 148 CR/PR at Tables III-1 & D-2; E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, dated Dec. 9, 2004, at Supplemental Table

1.

17

There are a large number of producers of wooden bedroom furniture in China. The petition

identified 133 Chinese producers and exporters of wooden bedroom furniture,135 and the Commission

received foreign producer responses from 154 Chinese producers of WBF.136 China was the largest

source of imported wooden bedroom furniture during the period of investigation, accounting for 50.2 

percent of total imports in 2003.137 Chinese production capacity for the subject product grew

considerably during the POI, more than doubling (measured in pieces) between 2001 and 2003.138

Chinese production capacity is projected to increase by *** percent in 2004 and by an additional ***

percent in 2005.139

Non-subject imports maintained a substantial but stable presence in the U.S. market during the

POI.140 The market share of non-subject imports was *** percent in 2001, *** percent in 2002, ***

percent in 2003, and *** percent in interim 2004.141 Non-subject imports maintained a stable market

share during the POI even though their average unit values were substantially lower than the subject

imports during the POI.142

The domestic industry was responsible for a substantial but stable percentage of the subject

imports during the period.143 During the POI, the domestic industry imported between 33.3 percent and

36.0 percent of the subject merchandise (measured by value) imported during the POI.144 However,

subject imports accounted for an increasing portion of the domestic industry’s total shipments during the

POI, with the volume of the industry’s subject imports growing from 7.8 percent of domestically

produced shipments in 2001 to 16.7 percent in 2002, 25.6 percent in 2003, and 32.7 percent in interim

2004.145

The domestic industry is divided with respect to its support for the petition.146 Thirty-eight

members of the industry, accounting for 37.8 percent of domestic production (measured in pieces) but

47.6 percent of the industry’s U.S. shipments (measured by value) in 2003, support the petition.147 Nine

members of the industry, accounting for 59.1 percent of domestic production (measured in pieces) but

45.6 percent of the industry’s U.S. shipments (measured by value) in 2003, oppose the petition.148 Seven 

members of the industry, accounting for 3.1 percent of domestic production (measured in pieces) and 6.8
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 149 CR/PR at Tables III-1 & D-2; E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, dated Dec. 9, 2004, at Supplemental Table

1. Two producers who take no position did not report data to the Commission. Id. We also note that ***. Counsel

for petitioners states that ***. 

 150 CR/PR at Figure IV-3.

 151 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(C)(i).

 152 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1. As noted earlier, we have relied primarily on value to perform our volumebased analyses because quantity-based volume data are not available for certain categories of official import data. 

However, we recognize that the use of value data for market share calculations may understate actual import volume

to the extent it reflects LTFV sales of wooden bedroom furniture. 

 153 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1. 

 154 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1. 

 155 CR and PR at Table IV-8 & C-1. The Lacquer Craft Group argued in its final comments (at 2-3) that the

Commission’s market share and consumption calculations understated the amount of merchandise shipped into the

United States by the Chinese exporter Markor, which received a de minimis margin from Commerce, making its

imports non-subject. Lacquer Craft suggested that the Commission adjust this data by using the volumes of exports

to the United States reported in Markor’s foreign producer questionnaire as a proxy for Markor’s U.S. shipments. 

Adjusting our consumption table in the manner suggested by Lacquer Craft does not make a significant difference in

the data or trends. See E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, et al., dated December 9, 2004, at Supplemental Table 2. 

 156 CR/PR at Table IV-7.

 157 CR/PR at Table IV-7.

18

percent of the industry’s U.S. shipments (measured by value) in 2003, take no position with respect to the

petition.149 Domestic producers opposing the petition accounted for a substantially larger percentage of

subject imports during the POI than those supporting or taking no position on the petition.150

B. Volume of the Subject Imports

Section 771(7)(C)(i) of the Act provides that the “Commission shall consider whether the volume

of imports of the merchandise, or any increase in that volume, either in absolute terms or relative to

production or consumption in the United States, is significant.”151

We find that the volume of subject imports increased rapidly and consistently during the POI,

both in absolute terms and relative to production and consumption in the United States. Measured by

value, the volume of the subject imports increased by *** percent between 2001 and 2003, rising from

$*** million in 2001 to $*** million in 2002 and to $*** billion in 2003.152 The volume of the subject

imports continued to rise significantly between interim periods, increasing from $*** million in interim

2003 to $*** million in interim 2004.153 

The market share of the subject imports also rose rapidly and consistently during the POI,

increasing from *** percent of apparent consumption in 2001 to *** percent in 2002 and 

*** percent in 2003.154 The subject imports’ market share also grew between interim periods, increasing

from *** percent in interim 2003 to *** percent in interim 2004.155 Finally, the ratio of subject imports to

domestic production (based on pieces) increased rapidly during the POI, growing from *** percent in

2001 to *** percent in 2002, and to *** percent in 2003.156 This trend continued over the interim periods,

increasing from *** percent in interim 2003 to 

*** percent in interim 2004. 157
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 158 In this regard, we note that the market share of the non-subject imports remained essentially stable during the

period of investigation, ranging between *** percent and *** percent of apparent consumption throughout the POI. 

CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1.

 159 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 4 & 16-17, 19-22; Furniture Retailers of America (“FRA”) Brief at 3; see

also Coalition Prehearing Brief at 4.

 160 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 4 & 16-17, 19-22; FRA Brief at 3; see also Coalition Prehearing Brief at 4. 

In this regard, we note that the term “blended strategy” refers to a strategic business decision made by members of

the industry to shift production of certain items of WBF furniture to China as a means of benefitting from the low

cost of production available in China. Id. Producers who adopt a “blended strategy” may import WBF as an entire

bedroom suite or as individual pieces of WBF, such as beds or nightstands. As respondents frankly concede,

however, the decision to shift production to facilities in China is based primarily on cost concerns, that is, on price. 

 161 CR at IV-10, PR at IV-9.

 162 See CR/PR at Appendix H-3-6; Furniture Brands Prehearing Brief at 4-5. 

 163 FRA Brief at 13.

 164 In this regard, we note that the statute does not suggest that increased imports that stimulate demand are to be

viewed, per se, as not being significant or injurious. On the contrary, the statute specifically directs consideration of

whether the volume of subject imports is significant “either in absolute terms or relative to production or

consumption in the United States.” 19 U.S.C. §1677(7)(C)(i). Thus, even if subject imports had increased aggregate

demand in the market, the Commission would still be required to assess, inter alia, the absolute level of the subject

imports, any increases in their market share, and their significance in the market.

 165 Commissioner Pearson finds that the record in this investigation does not allow a precise determination as to

how much of the increase in consumption was due to lower prices and how much was due to continued growth in

housing construction and home sales. Economic theory suggests that part of the consumption increase was due to

lower prices. However, demand growth due to lower prices appears to have been quite modest relative to demand

(continued...)

19

Given these rapid and consistent increases in subject imports during the POI, we find that the

volume of the subject imports was significant during the period of investigation, both in absolute terms

and relative to production and consumption in the United States. As we discuss below, the increases in

subject import volumes and market share came directly out of the market share of the domestic industry

and reduced the industry’s production, shipment, and sales levels significantly.158

We have considered respondents’ argument that the domestic industry is itself primarily

responsible for the large and consistent increases in subject volumes during the POI.159 According to

respondents, the increases in subject import volumes are the result of a decision by the domestic industry

to utilize a “blended” sourcing strategy to compete more efficiently in the market.160 We do not agree. 

Although it is true that the domestic producers imported approximately one third of all subject

merchandise imported into the United States during the POI, importers who are not members of the

domestic industry were responsible for roughly two-thirds of the subject imports and two-thirds of all

increases in subject import volumes during the POI.161 Thus, the bulk of the subject import increases

during the POI are attributable to the actions of importers that are not part of the domestic industry. 

Furthermore, even those domestic producers who have decided to “blend” their domestic production with

imports freely admit that they are shifting production to China to obtain the benefit of low production

costs,162 which indicates they are reducing their own production and sales of WBF in response to the

LTFV pricing of subject merchandise. 

We also considered respondents’ argument that an increased supply of moderately priced subject

WBF has increased overall demand in the market.163 We do not agree that the significant increases in

subject import volumes occurred primarily because they expanded aggregate demand in the market.164 165
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 165 (...continued)

growth driven by housing starts and home sales. 

 166 CR/PR at Table C-1.

 167 Compare CR/PR at Table IV-1 with CR/PR at Table IV-8.

 168 Petitioners Prehearing Brief, Ex. 9.

 169 In fact, the Lacquer Craft Group concedes there “is no denying that the volume of Chinese imports, and their

period of investigation rise, {were} material” during the POI. Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 10.

 170 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(C)(ii).

 171 CR at II-23, PR at II-14. Forty-four of 73 responding purchasers reported that domestic and subject

merchandise are always or frequently used interchangeably with one another. Id. Fifteen purchasers reported that

they are sometimes used interchangeably with one another. Id. 

 172 CR/PR at Table II-7. The subject imports were rated as being superior to the domestic merchandise with

respect to “lowest price” by the large majority of purchasers, while the domestic merchandise was rated as being

superior to the subject merchandise with respect to “delivery times” and “brand names” by a majority of purchasers. 

(continued...)

20

First, if these increases in subject volumes occurred because low-priced imports significantly expanded

demand in the market, we would have expected to find that increased subject import volumes satisfied the

newly-created demand without significantly affecting the industry’s shipment and production levels

during the POI. However, the opposite occurred in this case, with the industry experiencing significant

declines in its production, shipments, and sales levels as it lost substantial market share to subject

imports.166 Moreover, between 2001 and 2003, subject import volume rose much more sharply than the

increase in apparent consumption.167 Finally, although we recognize that demand for WBF is somewhat

elastic and might be expected to respond to the availability of low-priced imports, the record indicates a

closer tie between the increases in apparent consumption and increased housing starts and new house

sales during the POI than between consumption changes and subject import volumes.168 

Accordingly, we find both the volume and increase in volume of subject imports, both in absolute

terms and relative to production and consumption in the United States, to be significant.169

C. Price Effects of the Subject Imports

Section 771(7)(C)(ii) of the Act provides that, in evaluating the price effects of the subject

imports, the Commission shall consider whether –

 (I) there has been significant price underselling by the imported merchandise as

compared with the price of domestic like products of the United States, and

(II) the effect of imports of such merchandise otherwise depresses prices to a

significant degree or prevents price increases, which otherwise would have

occurred, to a significant degree.170

As discussed above, we find that there is a moderate to high degree of substitutability between

domestic wooden bedroom furniture and the subject imports. In this regard, the majority of purchasers

report that the subject imports and domestically produced WBF are always or frequently used

interchangeably.171 Moreover, a majority of purchasers reported that the subject imports and the domestic

and subject merchandise are comparable to one another with respect to most factors figuring into their

purchase decision.172 We also note that the record indicates that price is an important factor in the
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 172 (...continued)

Id.

 173 CR at II-22, PR at II-14. Similarly, the large majority of responding purchasers reported that price was either

the first or second most important factor in their purchase decision. CR/PR at Table II-3.

 174 CR/PR at Tables V-5-V-12 & Figures V-5-V-12.

 175 CR at V-16 & Tables V-5-V-12 & Figures V-5-V-12, PR at V-14 & Tables V-5-V-12 & Figures V-5-V-12. 

The purchaser price data (which cover a smaller volume of sales than the producer/importer data) show that the

subject imports undersold the domestic merchandise in the large majority of possible price comparisons. CR/PR at

Tables 13-20. 

 176 CR at V-16 & V-34, PR at V-14.

 177 We note that respondents have conceded that the subject imports have generally been priced well below

domestic merchandise. Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 11.

 178 In this regard, we note that domestic prices for several price comparison products recovered somewhat after

the filing of the petition, indicating that the filing of the petition had a beneficial effect on domestic prices in the

market. CR/PR at Tables V-5-V-12 and Figures V-5-V-12. 

 179 CR/PR at Tables V-5-V-8.

 180 CR/PR at Tables V-9-V-12.

 181 In this regard, we note that annual average unit value data for domestic shipments show a decline of 9.1

percent between 2001 and 2003, and a further decline of 3.9 percent between interim 2003 and interim 2004. CR/PR

at Table C-1.

21

purchase decision for wooden bedroom furniture, with the large majority of responding purchasers

reporting that “lowest price” is a very important factor in their purchase decision.173 

The quarterly price comparison data show that there was consistent and substantial underselling

by the subject imports throughout the period of investigation.174 The subject imports undersold the

domestic merchandise in all 112 of the quarterly price comparisons between producer and importer

pricing on the Louis Phillippe- and Mission-style items of furniture examined by the Commission in this

final phase investigation.175 Moreover, the margins of underselling exhibited by the subject imports were

large throughout the POI, ranging from 15.9 percent to 61.1 percent.176 Given the consistency and size of

underselling by the subject imports, we find that the subject imports undersold the domestic merchandise

significantly during the POI.177

Moreover, the price comparison data show that the subject imports depressed and suppressed

domestic prices to a significant degree during the POI. In particular, the pricing data show that, for each

price comparison product, weighted-average domestic prices declined significantly during the period

between the first quarter of 2001 and the final quarter of 2003, when petitioners filed the petition in this

investigation.178 For example, between the first quarter of 2001 and the last quarter of 2003, the

weighted-average domestic prices of the Louis Philippe-style bed, dresser, mirror, and night-stand

declined by 28.9 percent, 10.8 percent, 18.3 percent, and 8.8 percent, respectively.179 Similarly, between

the first quarter of 2001 and the last quarter of 2003, the weighted-average domestic prices of the

Mission-style bed, dresser, mirror, and night-stand declined by 13.3 percent, 5.8 percent, 22.3 percent,

and 15.6 percent, respectively.180 Thus, the pricing data show a significant correlation between

underselling by subject imports and domestic price declines in the market during the period before the

filing of the petition, especially given the importance of price to the purchase decision and the

substitutability between the domestic and subject merchandise.181 Further, given that declines in the

industry’s pricing during the POI outstripped declines in the industry’s costs of goods sold during the
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 182 CR/PR at Table VI-1. The industry’s cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased from 79.8

percent to 81.4 percent between 2001 and 2003; it was 80.2 percent in interim 2004. Id. The industry’s SG&A

expenses as a percentage of net sales also increased during the POI, growing from 15.5 percent in 2001 to 16.1

percent in 2003 and 16.6 percent in interim 2004. Id. Both of these changes affected the industry’s operating

income margins, which fell from 4.7 percent in 2001 to 2.5 percent in 2003, and 3.2 percent in interim 2004. Id.

 183 CR/PR at Tables V-5-V-12. We recognize that the volume trends in the purchaser price data are not as clear. 

However, as we noted above, the importer price comparisons cover a larger volume of sales.

 184 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 11.

 185 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 11 & 39-40; FRA Prehearing Brief at 18.

 186 See, e.g., Certain Ceramic Station Post Insulators from Japan, Inv. No. 731-TA-1023 (Final) USITC Pub. 3655

at 15, n. 104 (Dec. 2003); DRAMs and DRAM Modules from Korea, Inv. No. 701-TA-431 (Final), USITC Pub.

3616 at 24 (August 2003).

22

POI, the record indicates that this underselling caused the industry to experience a cost-price squeeze

during the period.182

The price comparison data also show that the significant and consistent underselling by the

subject imports caused a significant shift in purchases from the domestic merchandise to the subject

imports during the POI. In particular, the price comparison data for producers and importers show that,

although there were some fluctuations on a quarter-by-quarter basis, continued underselling by the subject

imports of the price comparison products led to significant declines in sales volumes for the domestic

industry over the POI and to substantial increases in the amount of subject merchandise sold for each

comparison product.183 Given this shift in purchase volumes and the moderate to high degree of

substitutability between the domestic and subject merchandise, the record indicates that subject import

underselling not only had a significant effect on the domestic industry’s prices but on its sales volumes

and market share as well.

Finally, we have considered respondents’ argument that the Commission’s weighted-average

price comparison data masks the fact that the subject imports did not, in fact, have any clear impact on

domestic prices during the POI.184 Although respondents concede that the Commission’s price

comparison charts show weighted-average domestic prices declining during the POI, they argue that a

company-specific analysis of pricing trends shows no clear correlation between domestic producer pricing

trends and underselling by the subject imports.185 We do not agree with this argument. Although it is true

that the Commission has the discretion to utilize any reasonable price comparison methodology in its

analysis, the quarterly weighted-average price comparison methodology used in this proceeding is the

standard methodology the Commission uses to assess whether subject imports are underselling domestic

merchandise and having adverse price effects in the market.186 We generally rely on weighted-average

pricing because it allows us to assess, in a meaningful fashion, whether general pricing trends across a

number of domestic producers indicate that the subject imports are having an adverse impact on domestic

prices overall.

By weight-averaging reported domestic and imported prices, we are able to ensure that we do not

place too much weight on pricing and price trends that are associated with smaller, less significant sales in

the market. Breaking our price series apart by segregating out individual producer pricing and basing our

price conclusions on those individual sets of data, as respondents suggest, would simply result in our

giving greater weight to those producers who should have less weight, comparatively, in the analysis. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 187 See 19 U.S.C. §1677(4)(A); Timken Co. v. United States, Slip op. 04-17 (Feb. 25, 2004); Calabrian Corp. v.

United States, 794 F. Supp. 377, 385-86 (CIT 1992).

 188 DRAMs and DRAM Modules from Korea, Inv. No. 701-TA-431 (Final), USITC Pub. 3616 at 24 (August

2003).

 189 CR/PR at Table V-4. We examined the percentage changes in producer prices between the first and last

quarters for which producers reported data, provided that data were reported for at least half of the requested

fourteen quarters. Id. This analysis showed that, of 81 producer level price changes over the POI, forty-four were

increases, thirty-six were decreases, and one showed no difference. CR at V-16, PR at V-14 & Table V-4.

 190 See E-Mail from W. Deese to N. Reynolds, dated December 21, 2004, at Attachment. 

 191 We also note that we received three allegations of lost revenues from the domestic producers during the POI

and were ***. CR at V-39-40 & V-42, PR at V-26-28. However, this fact does not offset the substantial record

evidence we have cited above that shows that the subject imports undersold the domestic merchandise significantly

during the POI and had significant adverse effects on domestic prices during the POI. 

 192 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(C)(iii). See also SAA at 851 and 885 (“In material injury determinations, the

Commission considers, in addition to imports, other factors that may be contributing to overall injury. While these

factors, in some cases, may account for the injury to the domestic industry, they also may demonstrate that an

industry is facing difficulties from a variety of sources and is vulnerable to dumped or subsidized imports.”).

23

Moreover, the statute directs us to assess the effect of subject imports on the industry “as a whole,”187

requiring us to focus on the prices of the broader industry rather than simply those of individual

producers.188

Finally, the quarterly individual producer pricing data are, in fact, consistent with our finding that

underselling by the subject import caused significant price depression and suppression and significant

sales shifts during the POI. Although the quarterly producer data show that prices increased during the

POI for a number of the reporting domestic producers, they also show that a substantial number of

producers, including a number of the largest volume producers, experienced significant price declines on

individual price comparison products during the POI.189 Further, the data also show that most of the

producers whose prices increased over the POI experienced significant declines in their volumes on price

comparison products during the POI.190 Thus, to the extent that individual producer prices were not

declining during the POI, the producers were generally losing significant volumes to the subject imports

as a result of underselling. Given this, we do not find that the individualized price comparison

methodology suggested by respondents indicates that the subject imports did not have a significant impact

on domestic prices or sales during the POI.191 

Accordingly, we find that there has been significant price underselling by the subject imports and

that the effect of such imports has been to depress prices for the domestic like product to a significant

degree during the POI.

D. Impact of the Subject Imports

In examining the impact of the subject imports on the domestic industry, we consider all relevant

economic factors that bear on the state of the industry in the United States.192 These factors include

output, sales, inventories, capacity utilization, market share, employment, wages, productivity, profits,

cash flow, return on investment, ability to raise capital, and research and development. No single factor is
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 193 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(C)(iii). See also SAA at 851 and 885 and Live Cattle from Canada and Mexico, Inv. Nos.

701-TA-386 and 731-TA-812-813 (Preliminary), USITC Pub. 3155 (Feb. 1999) at 25, n.148.

 194 CR/PR at Table C-1.

 195 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1.

 196 CR/PR at Tables IV-8 & C-1. As noted previously, the market share of non-subject imports remained

essentially stable throughout the POI (ranging between *** percent and *** percent), indicating that the subject

imports gains were made at the direct expense of the industry. Id.

 197 CR/PR at Table C-1.

 198 CR/PR at Tables III-2 & C-1. The industry’s reported capacity (measured in pieces) fell from 17.8 million

pieces in 2001 to 17.3 million pieces in 2003, and was 8.8 million pieces and 8.6 million pieces in interim 2003 and

2004, respectively. Id. These reported capacity declines are understated somewhat because we did not receive

producer questionnaires from a number of domestic producers that went out of business during the POI. CR/PR at

III-1, n. 4; Tr. at 13 (Dorn). In addition, the industry has closed as many as 68 plants producing WBF during the

POI. Petitioners Prehearing Brief at 37, & Ex. 32; Petitioners’ Final Comments at Ex. 2.

 199 CR/PR at Tables III-2 & C-1. Measured by pieces, the industry’s reported production volume fell from 14.0

million pieces in 2001 to 12.7 million pieces in 2003, and was 6.7 million pieces and 6.5 million pieces in interim

2003 and 2004, respectively. Id. Measured by pieces, the industry’s reported capacity utilization rate fell from 77.2

percent in 2001 to 72.7 percent in 2003. It was 76.1 percent and 74.6 percent in interim 2003 and 2004,

respectively. Id.

 200 CR/PR at Tables III-12 & C-1. We note that the Department of Labor has certified that 12,793 workers at 53

domestic plants were eligible for trade adjustment assistance during January 2001 through June 2004. CR at III-21,

PR at III-19.

24

dispositive and all relevant factors are considered “within the context of the business cycle and conditions

of competition that are distinctive to the affected industry.”193

As we discussed above, there were rapid and significant increases in the volume and market share

of the subject imports during the POI and the subject imports consistently undersold domestic

merchandise at significant margins throughout the POI. As these lower-priced subject imports entered the

market in increasing volumes during the POI, the domestic industry experienced substantial declines in

almost all of its trade and financial indicia, even during a period of growing apparent consumption.194

Between 2001 and 2003, as the subject imports gained *** percentage points of market share as a result

of consistent underselling, the industry lost 15.3 percentage points of market share.195 These declines

continued between interim periods, with the industry’s market share declining by 7.0 percentage points

between interim 2003 and 2004 as the subject imports saw their market share increase by *** percentage

points.196 Further, in the face of these increasing volumes of low-priced subject imports, the industry

experienced significant declines in its capacity, production, capacity utilization, domestic shipments, net

sales values and quantities, employment levels, operating income, operating income margins, and capital

investment.197

Because of its relatively high variable costs, the industry responded to increased volumes of

subject imports in the WBF market primarily by reducing its capacity, production, and employment

levels. The industry’s reported production capacity fell by 2.9 percent from 2001 to 2003, and by 1.8

percent between the interim periods.198 The industry’s production quantities fell by 9.1 percent between

2001 and 2003, and by 2.6 percent between interim periods; its capacity utilization rate declined by 4.5

percentage points between 2001 and 2003 and by 1.3 percentage points between interim periods.199 The

number of production workers employed by the industry declined significantly during the POI, falling by

19.9 percent between 2001 and 2003, and by 11.5 percent between interim periods.200 Wages paid by the

industry fell by 15.6 percent between 2001 and 2003, and by 3.8 percent between interim periods, while
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 201 CR/PR at Tables III-12 & C-1. We note that the industry’s productivity increased by 14.9 percent between

2001 and 2003, and by 5.9 percent between interim periods. Id. 

 202 The declines in the industry’s sales and shipment levels, as well as its market share losses, are due, in part, to

its loss of display “slots” at retailers during the POI. CR at II-16, PR at II-10-11. As we noted above, access to these

display slots is a critical component in selling WBF through the retailer to the retail customer. Twenty-five of 41

responding producers reported that they lost floor space at retailers to subject suppliers and 21 of 51 purchasers

reported that they allotted less floor space to the domestic producers relative to the subject imports during the POI. 

CR at II-16, PR at II-10-11.

 203 CR/PR at Tables III-4 & C-1. Measured by pieces, the quantity of the industry’s domestic shipments dropped

from 14.0 million in 2001 to 12.6 million in 2003, and was 6.6 million and 6.4 million in interim 2003 and interim

2004, respectively. Id. The value of the industry’s domestic shipments dropped from $2.3 billion in 2001 to $1.9

billion in 2003, and was $961 million and $899 million in interim 2003 and interim 2004, respectively. Id. 

 204 CR and PR at Tables VI-1 & C-1. The industry’s aggregate net sales value declined from $2.3 billion in 2001

to $1.9 billion in 2003, and was $991.8 million and $912.9 million in interim 2003 and interim 2004, respectively. 

Id. The industry’s aggregate net sales quantity fell from 13.9 million pieces in 2001 to 12.5 million pieces in 2003,

and was 6.6 million pieces and 6.3 million pieces in interim 2003 and interim 2004, respectively. Id.

 205 CR/PR at Table IV-8. We received several lost sales allegations from two members of the industry during the

final investigation. CR at V-35-38, PR at V-25-26. *** these allegations. Id. However, this fact does not offset the

evidence in the record indicating that the industry lost substantial sales volumes to the imports, especially

considering the fact that most of these allegations related to sales made in the institutional/hospitality sector of the

market, id., which accounts for a small portion of the overall market. CR/PR at Figure III-4.

 206 CR/PR at Tables VI-1 & C-1.

 207 CR and PR at Tables VI-1 & C-1. The industry’s aggregate operating income fell from $109.7 million in 2001

to $47.5 million in 2003, and was $30.7 million and $29.2 million in interim 2003 and interim 2004, respectively. 

Id.

 208 CR and PR at Tables VI-1 & C-1.

 209 CR/PR at Tables VI-1 & C-1. 

25

hours worked in the industry fell by 20.4 percent between 2001 and 2003, and by 9.1 percent between

interim periods.201 

The increased volumes of the subject imports and their corresponding price effects also had a

significant adverse impact on the industry’s sales and shipment levels.202 The quantity of the industry’s

domestic shipments (measured in pieces) declined by 9.8 percent between 2001 and 2003 and by 2.7

percent between interim periods, while the value of its domestic shipments declined by 18.1 percent

between 2001 and 2003, and by 6.4 percent between interim periods.203 The industry’s net sales values

declined by 18.3 percent between 2001 and 2003 and by 8.0 percent between interim periods, while its

net sales quantities declined by 9.9 percent from 2001 to 2003, and by 5.1 percent between interim

periods.204 These declines occurred even as apparent consumption increased by 8.2 percent from 2001 to

2002, by 4.6 percent between 2002 and 2003, and by 12.0 percent between interim periods.205

While remaining positive throughout the POI, the industry’s financial performance indicators

declined significantly between 2001 and 2003, with the industry’s operating income continuing to decline

between interim periods.206 The industry’s operating income fell by 56.7 percent, from $109.8 million to

$47.5 million, between 2001 and 2003, and by 4.9 percent between interim periods.207 The industry’s net

income fell by 71.4 percent, from $77.2 million to $22.1 million, between 2001 and 2003, and remained

essentially unchanged between interim periods.208 The industry’s operating income margin fell from 4.7

percent in 2001 to 4.6 percent in 2002 and to 2.5 percent in 2003.209 The industry’s operating income
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 210 CR/PR at Tables VI-1 & C-1. 

 211 CR/PR at Table VI-6 & C-1. The industry’s research and development expenses fell from $11.039 million in

2001 to $10.6 million in 2003, and were $5.7 million in interim 2003 and $5.5 million in interim 2004. Id. The

industry’s capital expenditures fell from $57.4 million in 2001 to $30.4 million in 2003, and were $16.3 million and

$11.5 million in interim 2003 and 2004, respectively. Id.

 212 We have considered respondents’ argument that the staff report’s financial charts make the industry’s financial

condition appear worse than it is because certain members of the industry (such as ***) included non-recurring

restructuring costs in their financial data as operating costs. Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 34-36; FRA

Prehearing Brief at 27-29. Respondents argue that the Commission should analyze the industry’s financial condition

without these restructuring costs, looking primarily at the financial results of the industry’s “continuing operations.” 

We disagree. Most, if not all, of these restructuring expenses were associated with the shutdown or closing of plants

by members of the industry during the POI, which were related, at least in part, to the impact of subject imports. CR

at VI-7, n.7, PR at IV-7, n.7. Moreover, these costs were reported in accordance with GAAP. CR at VI-7, n.8 PR at

IV-7, n.7. Because we find that these shutdowns were due, in significant part, to the impact of the subject imports

on the industry, we find that it is reasonable to include the related costs in the industry’s reported costs of operations.

Furthermore, we note that, in response to these arguments, we obtained data on the industry’s non-recurring

costs to assess whether inclusion of these costs significantly affected the industry’s operating results. Memorandum

INV-BB-149 at 1. Although the resulting data show that the operating income and margins of the industry are

higher on a year-to-year basis when these costs are excluded, the data also show that the declines in the industry’s

operating income and margins are actually larger when these costs are stripped out. Id. (showing a decline from

2001 to 2003 of $90.3 million in operating income before non-recurring costs are stripped out, as opposed to a

decline of $62.3 million with the costs included, and a decline of 3.2 percentage points in the industry’s operating

income margin with non-recurring costs stripped out, as opposed to a decline of 2.2 percentage points with the costs

included). Given this, the exclusion of these costs would have no impact on our findings in this case.

 213 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 9 & 31-32.

 214 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 31-33; FRA Prehearing Brief at 15.

 215 19 U.S.C. §1677(7)(B)(III)(emphasis added).

26

margin was 3.1 percent and 3.2 percent in interim 2003 and interim 2004, respectively.210 Finally, the

industry’s research and development and capital expenditures both fell during the POI.211 

In sum, subject imports had a significant adverse impact on the condition of the domestic industry

during the POI. As discussed above, the significant increases in the volumes of the subject imports

consistently and significantly undersold the domestic merchandise during the period of investigation. The

domestic industry lost significant market share to LTFV imports, which in turn significantly affected the

industry’s production, shipments and sales volumes as well as nearly all of its other indicators. Although

the industry’s operating margin remained positive throughout the period of investigation, the industry’s

aggregate operating income fell by a significant amount during the POI.212 Thus, we find that subject

imports adversely affected the performance of the domestic industry during the period of investigation.

As part of our analysis, we have considered respondents’ argument that the industry has actually

benefitted from the subject imports because it has adopted a “blended sourcing” strategy that allows it to

source WBF from the most cost-effective suppliers in China and the United States.213 They argue that

producers who have adopted this strategy have been able to maintain their profitability levels during the

POI, and that declines in the industry’s production or sales levels are offset by its increased sales of

subject and non-subject imports during the POI.214 Respondents’ arguments on this score are legally and

factually flawed. First, as a legal matter, the statute directs us to assess the “impact of imports on

domestic producers of domestic like products, but only in the context of domestic production operations

within the United States.”215 Congress has specifically stated that the:
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 216 S. Rep. No. 100-171, 100th Cong., 1st Sess. 117 (1988)(emphasis added); see also H. Rep. 100-40, 100th Cong.,

1st Sess. 128-29 (1988). 

 217 Respondents argued that the industry is “smaller but stronger” during the final phase investigation. See, e.g.,

Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 31, Lacquer Craft Posthearing Brief at 3 and 6. The data discussed above, in

particular the financial data, disprove this claim.

 218 See CR at IV-10, Table IV-8 & Figure IV-3, PR at IV-9, Table IV-8 & Figure IV-3. 

 219 CR/PR at Table VI-5.

 220 CR/PR at Table VI-5 (e.g., *** and ***).

 221 Compare CR/PR at Table VI-5 (importing producers had operating margins of 4.7 percent in 2001, 4.8 percent

in 2002, 2.5 percent in 2003, and 3.2 percent in interim 2004) with CR/PR at Table VI-4 (importing producers who

did not import had operating margins of 4.8 percent in 2001, 3.7 percent in 2002, 2.3 percent in 2003, and 3.0

percent in interim 2004). 

 222 Lacquer Craft Posthearing Brief at 1; FRA Posthearing Brief at 3. Respondents contend that subject imports

would still undersell domestic merchandise significantly, even if dumping duties in these amounts were to be

imposed. Id. To the extent that respondents are arguing that the dumping margins are too low to benefit the

domestic industry, we note that nothing in the statute or case law requires (or allows) us to consider the likely

effectiveness of a dumping order in making our injury determination. The possibility that non-subject imports will

increase in the future after an antidumping order is imposed is similarly not relevant to our analysis of whether

subject imports are currently materially injuring the industry.

27

foreign operations or import operations of domestic producers are not to be considered in

measuring the impact of imports on the domestic industry. For example, profits earned by a

domestic producer due to products which it imports to meet competition should not be the basis

of a negative determination of injury. The domestic industry may be materially injured by reason

of unfair imports even if some producers themselves import in order to stay in business.”216 

The statute therefore requires the Commission to focus on whether the subject imports are having an

adverse impact on the domestic production operations of the industry, not on whether the industry’s

overall operations, including its import operations, are performing well despite the presence of subject

imports in the market. And, as we discussed above, the record shows that the domestic production

operations of these companies have clearly become smaller and weaker as a result of increased LTFV

subject imports during the POI.217

Second, respondents’ argument is flawed factually. It ignores the fact that nearly two-thirds of

subject imports were imported not by members of the industry but by importers selling merchandise in

competition with the industry.218 The adverse impact of these imports cannot be attributed to the adoption

of a “blended sourcing” strategy by the domestic producers during the POI. Further, the record does not

support the argument that members of the industry who have adopted such a strategy have been able to

maintain their profitability levels during the POI by importing subject merchandise.219 While several of

the larger domestic producers who import have been able to maintain the operating income margins on

their domestic production operations during the POI,220 the record also shows that, considered as a whole,

domestic producers who import experienced similar operating income margins declines on their domestic

operations as did those members of the industry who did not import during the POI.221

We also have considered in our analysis respondents’ argument that imposition of the dumping

margins found by Commerce would not have had any impact on competition in the WBF market during

the POI.222 Again, we do not find this argument persuasive. First, although we have considered the
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 223 69 Fed. Reg. at 67317-67319. In its final affirmative LTFV determination, Commerce found that one

company, Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacturing Company, had a de minimis rate (of 0.79 percent). 

For the other companies entitled to an individual dumping margin, Commerce found dumping margins ranging from

2.22 percent to 198.08 percent. The rate applicable to 115 firms (those who filed section A responses alone) was

8.64 percent. The “all others” rate found by Commerce was 198.08 percent.

 224 19 U.S.C. §1677(7)(C)(iii)(V).

 225 19 U.S.C. §1677(7)(C)(iii). Commissioner Pearson does not join the remainder of this discussion on margins.

 226 19 U.S.C. §1677(7)(C)(iii).

 227 We also note the statute requires us to assess the actual impact of the prices and volumes of subject imports on

the current industry within existing conditions of competition in the market in our present injury analysis. 19 U.S.C.

§1677(7)(C)(iii).

 228 Petitioners Posthearing Brief at Ex. 17. 

 229 See, e.g., CR/PR at Tables V-5-V-12 & Figure V-5-V-12.

 230 CR/PR at Tables III-1 & D-2; E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, dated Dec. 9, 2004, at Supplemental Table

1.

 231 CR/PR at Tables III-1 & D-2; E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, dated Dec. 9, 2004, at Supplemental Table

1. Three producers that support the petition did not report data to the Commission. Id. Seven members of the

industry, accounting for 3.1 percent of domestic production (measured in pieces) and 6.8 percent of the industry’s

U.S. shipments (measured by value) in 2003, take no position with respect to the petition. Two of these producers

did not report data to the Commission. Id.

 232 Lacquer Craft Prehearing Brief at 40; Furniture Brands Prehearing Brief at 1-2.

28

margins of dumping announced by Commerce in our analysis,223 as required by the statute,224 the dumping

margin is only one of the many factors that we are required to consider as part of our assessment of the

impact of subject imports on the condition of the industry.225 Thus, whether or not the LTFV margins

announced by Commerce are properly characterized as being low, moderately high or very high, we are

still required to assess these margins within the context of all of the other factors that establish whether

the subject imports have affected the condition of the domestic industry.226 227

Furthermore, it is not the case that the filing of the petition and imposition of Commerce’s

preliminary duties have had no impact on the pricing or volumes of the subject merchandise during the

POI. On the contrary, the record indicates that imposition of preliminary duties in June 2004 had a

significant dampening effect on the volume of subject imports.228 Moreover, our price comparison data

indicate that the filing of the petition has had some beneficial effect on domestic prices in the market

during the first half of 2004.229

Finally, we have considered the fact that a substantial proportion of the industry opposes the

petition and the imposition of antidumping duties in this investigation. As we noted previously, nine

members of the industry, accounting for 59.1 percent of domestic production (measured in pieces) but

45.6 percent of the industry’s U.S. shipments (measured in value) in 2003, oppose the petition.230 Thirtyeight members of the industry, accounting for 37.8 percent of domestic production (measured in pieces)

but 47.6 percent of the industry’s U.S. shipments (measured in value) in 2003, support the petition.231

Respondents argue that the opposition of a substantial portion of the industry to the petition indicates that

the industry as a whole is not being materially injured by subject imports and that the subject imports

from China have been a net benefit to the industry’s operations.232 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 233 To the extent that respondents’ argument appears to suggest that we should revisit whether the petitioners had

“standing” to file the petition on behalf of the industry, we note that it is the responsibility of the Commerce

Department, not the Commission, to determine whether there is sufficient domestic industry support for the petition. 

See, e.g., 19 U.S.C. §1673a(c)(4). Moreover, once made, Commerce’s standing decision may not be revisited

after initiation. 19 U.S.C. §1673a(c)(4)(E); SAA at 863 (“Arguments regarding industry support should not be made

to either Commerce or the Commission following initiation.”); Fujitsu Limited v. United States, 36 F. Supp. 2d 394

(Ct. Int’l Trade 1999). Thus, to the extent these arguments pertained to whether or not the petitioners had standing

to file the case, they are irrelevant to our determination.

 234 See Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 287 F.3d 1365, 1375-76 (Fed. Cir. 2002). 

 235 CR at III-3, PR at III-3; E-Mail from F. Fischer to K. Jones, et al., dated Dec. 9, 2004, at Supplemental Table

1.

 236 ***. CR/PR at Table III-13. 

 237 CR/PR at Table IV-3.

29

We do not find respondents’ argument compelling.233 While it is true that we have the discretion

to consider the level of an industry’s support for the petition as part of our analysis, the level of support

by the industry is not dispositive with respect to a finding of present material injury.234 Thus, even though

a substantial percentage of the industry opposes the petition, this does not outweigh the other record

evidence indicating that the subject imports have had significant volume and price-related effects on the

industry. 

Moreover, while it is true that nine members of the industry, representing a majority of domestic

production in 2003, oppose the imposition of dumping duties, thirty-eight producers, representing a larger

percentage of domestic shipments (measured by value) in 2003 than those in opposition, support the

imposition of duties in this case.235 Also, we note that six unions support the petition, including two

unions whose members work at facilities owned by ***.236 Thus, there remains substantial industry-wide

support for the petition. Finally, we would add that the nine domestic producers who oppose the petition

have been responsible for the large majority of the subject merchandise imported by the industry during

the POI,237 indicating that their views on this matter are affected by a desire to continue importing subject

imports. 

Accordingly, we conclude that the subject imports of WBF have had a significant adverse impact

on the domestic industry. 

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, we find that the domestic wooden bedroom furniture industry is

materially injured by reason of LTFV imports from China.


Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 At the time of the filing of the petition, the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee For Legal Trade

(AFM Committee) consisted of 27 U.S. producers. However, since the institution of the investigation two firms,

Hooker and Cresent, have withdrawn from the AFM Committee. See letter of Joseph W. Dorn, counsel for 

petitioners, to Commerce and the Commission dated July 27, 2004, indicating Hooker’s withdrawal as a petitioner;

and letter of Joseph W. Dorn to Commerce and the Commission dated September 17, 2004, indicating Cresent’s

withdrawal as a petitioner. ***.

 2

 On December 4, 2003, the petitioners amended the petition to include four additional labor unions as copetitioners: UBC Southern Council of Industrial Workers, Local Union 2305, Columbus, MS; United Steelworkers

of America, Local 193U, Lewisburg, PA; Carpenters Industrial Union, Local 2093, Phoenix, AZ; and Teamsters,

Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 991, Bay Minette, AL. See letter to the Commission and Commerce

from petitioners dated December 4, 2003.

On November 2, 2004, the petitioners amended the petition to include an additional labor union as copetitioner–the IUE, Industrial Division of CWA, Local 82472, Hagerstown, MD. See letter to the Commission and

Commerce from petitioners dated November 2, 2004.

 3

 The merchandise subject to this investigation is wooden bedroom furniture, as described in the section entitled

The Subject Product in Part I of this report. 

I-1

PART I: INTRODUCTION

BACKGROUND

This investigation was instituted in response to a petition filed with the U.S. International Trade

Commission (Commission) and the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) on October 31, 2003, by

the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee For Legal Trade, Washington, DC, and its individual

members,1

 and the Cabinet Makers, Millmen, and Industrial Carpenters, Local 721, Whittier, CA.2 The

petition alleges that an industry in the United States is materially injured, and threatened with material

injury, by reason of imports from China of wooden bedroom furniture3

 that are alleged to be sold in the

United States at less than fair value (LTFV). Information relating to the background of this investigation

is presented in table I-1.

PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

The Commission has not previously conducted antidumping or countervailing duty investigations

concerning wooden bedroom furniture.

ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT

Information on the subject merchandise, alleged dumping margins, and the domestic like product

is presented in Part I. Information on conditions of competition and other economic factors is presented

in Part II. Information on the condition of the U.S. industry, including data on capacity, production,

shipments, inventories, and employment, is presented in Part III. Information on the volume of imports of

the subject merchandise, apparent consumption, and market shares is presented in Part IV. Part V

presents data on prices in the U.S. market. Part VI presents information on the financial condition of U.S.

producers. Information on the producers in China and on U.S. importers’ inventories is presented in Part

VII.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-2

Table I-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: Chronology of investigation No. 731-TA-1058

Date Action

October 31, 2003 Petition filed with Commerce and the Commission

October 31, 2003 Commission institutes investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Preliminary)

November 10, 2003 Commission publishes notice of institution in the Federal Register1

November 21, 2003 Commission’s public conference

November 24, 2003 Commerce publishes in the Federal Register its notice extending the date of its initiation of

investigation2

December 17, 2003 Commerce publishes notice of its initiation in the Federal Register3

January 9, 2004 Date of Commission’s vote in the preliminary phase investigation

January 12, 2004 Commission’s transmittal of its preliminary determination to Commerce

January 20, 2004 Commission’s views sent to Commerce

June 24, 2004 Commerce publishes its preliminary antidumping determination in the Federal Register

July 15, 2004 Commission publishes its schedule for the final phase investigation in the Federal Register4

August 5, 2004 Commerce publishes an amended preliminary antidumping determination in the Federal Register

September 9, 2004 Commerce publishes an amended preliminary antidumping determination in the Federal Register

November 9, 2004 Commission’s hearing5

November 17, 2004 Commerce publishes its final antidumping determination in the Federal Register6

December 10, 2004 Commission’s vote

December 22, 2004 Commission’s transmittal of its determination and views to Commerce

1

 68 FR 63816.

2

 68 FR 65875.

3

 68 FR 70228. 

4

 69 FR 42452, presented in app. A.

5

 A list of witnesses appearing at the Commission’s hearing is presented in app. B.

6

 69 FR 67313, presented in app. A. 

Source: Various Federal Register notices.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 4 The financial analysis of U.S. producers presented in Part VI of this report is based on the responses of 43 firms.

 5

 Coverage was calculated using the Commission’s total U.S. shipment value for 2003 of $1.879 billion (see table

III-4) and the petitioners’ U.S. industry estimate for 2003 of $2.141 billion. Staff phone conversations with Joseph

Dorn, counsel to petitioners, October 18, 2004; and Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett,

October 19, 2004.

 6

 The Commission received questionnaire responses from 123 U.S. importers believed to account for

approximately 80 percent of imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China in 2003. Coverage was calculated

using the value of U.S. imports from China reported by responding U.S. importers in 2003 ($1.124 billion) compared

to the value of imports of $1.402 billion in 2003 from official import statistics.

 7

 Coverage was calculated using the Commission’s quantity of wooden beds exported to the United States

reported by Chinese producers in 2003 (1.948 million) and the quantity of wooden beds imported from China in

2003 (3.137 million) from official import statistics.

 8

 69 FR 67313, November 17, 2004.

 9

 Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacture Co., Ltd. (Markor Tianjin) received a de minimis dumping

margin of 0.79 percent ad valorem.

 10 Commerce estimated that the seven mandatory respondents account for approximately 35 percent of U.S. 

imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China. See Commerce’s Fact Sheet from its preliminary determination,

p. 1.

 11 Chinese producers/exporters subject to the Section A rate are believed to account for approximately 55 percent

of U.S. imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China.

 12 Chinese producers/exporters subject to the PRC-wide rate of 198.08 percent ad valorem are believed to account

for approximately 10 percent of imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China. At the time of the preliminary

determination in June 2004, Chinese producers/exporters subject to the PRC-wide rate were believed to account for

approximately 20 percent of imports from China. See “Documentation Led To Lower Duties, DOC Says,” Furniture

Today, November 10, 2004.

I-3

SUMMARY OF DATA PRESENTED IN THE REPORT

A summary of data collected in the investigation is presented in appendix C. U.S. producers’ 

data are based on the questionnaire responses of 49 firms4

 accounting for approximately 88 percent of

estimated U.S. shipments (based on value) in 2003.5

 Data on U.S. imports are based on official statistics

of Commerce, except as noted.6

 Data on the industry in China are based on the questionnaire responses

of 154 firms believed to account for approximately 62 percent of Chinese exports of the subject

merchandise to the United States in 2003.7

THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF SALES AT LTFV

On November 17, 2004, Commerce published its final antidumping determination in the Federal

Register.

8

 The final dumping margins range from 0.79 percent ad valorem9 to 198.08 percent ad valorem. 

Commerce determined separate rates for seven “mandatory” respondents ranging from 0.79 percent ad

valorem to 198.08 percent ad valorem,

10 and 115 Chinese producers/exporters that voluntarily completed

Commerce’s “Section A” questionnaire and demonstrated that they were eligible to receive a separate rate

of 8.64 percent ad valorem.

11 The China-wide rate for all other producers/exporters in China is 198.08

percent ad valorem.

12 The period of investigation for Commerce’s dumping investigation is April 2003-

September 2003. Commerce used Indian surrogate values to calculate factors of production, material

inputs, and other costs.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 13 See table III-1 in Part III of this report. The top 10 U.S. producers had U.S. shipments of $1.202 billion in 2003

out of an estimated industry total U.S. shipments of $2.141 billion in 2003.

 14 The top 10 reporting U.S. importers reported imports of $557.4 million of wooden bedroom furniture from

China in 2003, while total reported U.S. imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China were $1.165 billion in

2003.

I-4

Commerce’s final dumping margins, as amended, are as follows:

Manufacturer/exporter

Final dumping margin

Percent ad valorem

Dongguan Lung Dong 2.22

Dorbest Group 16.70

Lacquer Craft 6.95

Markor Tianjin1 0.79

Shing Mark 5.07

Starcorp 15.24

Tech Lane 198.08

Section A respondents (115 firms) 8.64

PRC-wide (all other firms) 198.08

1 De minimis margin.

SUMMARY OF MARKET PARTICIPANTS

Over 50 U.S. firms produced wooden bedroom furniture during January 2001-June 2004, and

over 120 U.S. firms imported wooden bedroom furniture from China. Table I-2 presents a list of the

largest U.S. producers and importers of wooden bedroom furniture.

Table I-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Largest U.S. producers and U.S. importers of the subject merchandise, 

2003

*******

The top 10 reporting U.S. producers accounted for approximately 56 percent of estimated U.S.

producers’ shipments (based on value) in 2003.13 The top 10 reporting U.S. importers accounted for

approximately 48 percent of U.S. imports (based on value) of the subject merchandise in 2003.14
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 15 Petitioners’ posthearing brief, exh. 1, p. 2.

 16 69 FR 67314, November 17, 2004. 

I-5

U.S. producers and importers sell wooden bedroom furniture principally to the many retailers of

the product. Some of the producers and importers are retailers themselves. Table I-3 presents a list of the

largest known purchasers of domestically produced wooden bedroom furniture (based on value), and the

largest purchasers of subject merchandise (based on value) imported from China.

Table I-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Largest known U.S. purchasers of domestically produced product and

subject merchandise imported from China, 2003

*******

The Commission received 154 questionnaire responses from wooden bedroom furniture

producers in China that are believed to account for approximately 62 percent of exports of wooden

bedroom furniture to the United States in 2003. However, there may be tens of thousands of producers of

wooden bedroom furniture in China.15 Information on the industry in China is presented in Part VII of

this report.

THE SUBJECT PRODUCT

Scope

Commerce has defined wooden bedroom furniture, the product subject to investigation, as 

follows–16

Wooden bedroom furniture is generally, but not exclusively, designed, manufactured, and

offered for sale in coordinated groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the individual pieces

are of approximately the same style and approximately the same material and/or finish. 

The subject merchandise is made substantially of wood products, including both solid

wood and also engineered wood products made from wood particles, fibers, or other

wooden materials such as plywood, oriented strand board, particle board, and

fiberboard, with or without wood veneers, wood overlays, or laminates, with or without

non-wood components or trim such as metal, marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other

resins, and whether or not assembled, completed, or finished.

The subject merchandise includes: (1) Wooden beds such as loft beds, bunk beds, and

other beds; (2) wooden headboards for beds (whether stand-alone or attached to side

rails), wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for

beds; (3) night tables, night stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, mule chests,

gentlemen’s chests, bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, wardrobes, vanities, chessers,

chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; (4) dressers with framed glass mirrors that are
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 17 A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-of-drawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be in two or more

sections), with one or two sections mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly larger chest; also known as a

tallboy.

 18 A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers usually composed of a base and a top section with drawers, and

supported on four legs or a small chest (often 15 inches or more in height).

 19 A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, not more than four feet high, normally set on short legs. 

 20 A chest of drawers is typically a case containing drawers for storing clothing.

 21 A chest is typically a case piece taller than it is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or without one or

more doors for storing clothing. The piece can either include drawers or be designed as a large box incorporating a

lid. 

 22 A door chest is typically a chest with hinged doors to store clothing, whether or not containing drawers. The

piece may also include shelves for televisions and other entertainment electronics.

 23 A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest of drawers normally used for storing undergarments and

lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached.

 24 A hutch is typically an open case of furniture with shelves that typically sits on another piece of furniture and

provides storage for clothes.

 25 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or

more drawers (either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or

other apparatus for storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold television receivers and/or other

audio-visual entertainment systems.

I-6

attached to, incorporated in, sit on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chests-on-chests,17

highboys,18 lowboys,19 chests of drawers,20 chests,21 door chests,22 chiffoniers,23 hutches,24

and armoires;25 (6) desks, computer stands, filing cabinets, book cases, or writing tables

that are attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise; and (7) other bedroom

furniture consistent with the above list. 

The scope of the Petition excludes: (1) Seats, chairs, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds,

stools, and other seating furniture; (2) mattresses, mattress supports (including box

springs), infant cribs, water beds, and futon frames; (3) office furniture, such as desks,

stand-up desks, computer cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and bookcases; (4) dining

room or kitchen furniture such as dining tables, chairs, servers, sideboards, buffets,

corner cabinets, china cabinets, and china hutches; (5) other non-bedroom furniture,

such as television cabinets, cocktail tables, end tables, occasional tables, wall systems,

book cases, and entertainment systems; (6) bedroom furniture made primarily of wicker,

cane, osier, bamboo or rattan; (7) side rails for beds made of metal if sold separately

from the headboard and footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in which bentwood parts 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 26 As used herein, bentwood means solid wood made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to a curved shape

by bending it while made pliable with moist heat or other agency, and then set by cooling or drying. See Customs

Headquarters’ Ruling Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976. 

 27 Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24'' in width, 18'' in

depth, and 49'' in height, including a minimum of 5 lined drawers lined with felt or felt-like material, at least one side

door lined with felt or felt-like material, with necklace hangers, and a flip-top lid with inset mirror. See

Memorandum from Laurel LaCivita to Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, Issues and Decision Memorandum

Concerning Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden Bedroom

Furniture from the People’s Republic of China, dated August 31, 2004.

 28 Cheval mirrors, i.e., any framed, tiltable mirror with a height in excess of 50'' that is mounted on a

floor-standing, hinged base. See Id.

 29 Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture parts made of wood products (as defined above) that are not

otherwise specifically named in this scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, wooden footboards for beds, wooden

side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess the essential character of wooden bedroom

furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified in HTS subheading

9403.90.70.

I-7

predominate;26 (9) jewelry armories (sic);27 (10) cheval mirrors,28 and (11) certain metal

parts.29

Imports of subject merchandise are classified under statistical category 9403.50.9040 of

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) as “wooden . . . beds”

and under statistical category 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as “other . . . wooden

furniture of a kind used in the bedroom.” In addition, wooden headboards for beds,

wooden footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds

may also be entered under statistical category 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as “parts of

wood” and framed glass mirrors may also be entered under statistical category

7009.92.5000 of the HTSUS as “glass mirrors . . . framed.” This investigation covers all

wooden bedroom furniture meeting the above description, regardless of tariff

classification. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and

customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 30 U.S. Customs and Border Protection (Customs) collects quantity data for beds but not for other wooden

bedroom furniture; therefore, only value data for wooden bedroom furniture from official statistics are presented in

this report, except as noted.

I-8

U.S. Tariff Treatment

Table I-4 presents current tariff rates for wooden bedroom furniture.30 The scope mentions four

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) subheadings and statistical reporting numbers;

however, most of the subject imports enter under the first two statistical reporting numbers, 9403.50.9040

(beds) and 9403.50.9080 (other wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom). The third number, HTS

subheading 9403.90.70, contains, among other things, certain metal furniture parts and certain unfinished

furniture parts made of wood products. The fourth number, HTS subheading 7009.92.50, is a residual or

“basket” category that contains, among other items, framed glass mirrors of a kind used in the bedroom. 

Table I-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: Tariff rates, 2004

HTS provision Article description1

General2 Special3 Column 24

Rates (percent ad valorem)

9403.50.9040 Wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom:

Other (than bent-wood furniture):

Other (than designed for motor vehicle use):

Beds

Free (5

) 40.0

9403.50.90806 Wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom:

Other (than bent-wood furniture):

Other (than designed for motor vehicle use):

Other (than beds)

Free (5

) 40.0

9403.90.7000 Wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom:

Other (than bent-wood furniture):

Parts of furniture (other than of a kind used

for motor vehicles), of wood

Free (5

) 40.0

7009.92.5000 Glass mirrors, whether or not framed, including

rear-view mirrors:

Framed: Over 929 cm2

 reflecting area

6.5 Free7

 45.0

1

 An abridged description is provided for convenience; however, an unabridged description may be obtained from the

respective headings, subheadings, and legal notes of the HTS. 2

 Normal trade relations, formerly known as the most-favored-nation duty rate, applicable to imports from China. 3

 For eligible goods under the Generalized System of Preferences, African Growth and Opportunity Act, Caribbean Basin

Economic Recovery Act, Andean Trade Preference Act, Automotive Products Trade Act, Israel Free Trade Agreement, Jordan

Free Trade Agreement, and NAFTA-originating goods of Canada and Mexico, and Chile Free Trade Agreement. 4

 Applies to imports from a small number of countries that do not enjoy normal or preferential trade relations duty status. 5

 Not applicable.

6

 Customs does not collect quantity data for this statistical reporting number. See footnote to text below.

7

 Imports from Singapore enter at a rate of 4.8 percent ad valorem pursuant to the United States-Singapore Free Trade

Agreement.

Source: Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2004).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 31 The Commission’s decision regarding the appropriate domestic products that are “like” the subject imported

products is based on a number of factors including (1) physical characteristics and uses; (2) common manufacturing

facilities and production employees; (3) interchangeability; (4) customer and producer perceptions; (5) channels of

distribution; and, where appropriate, (6) price.

 32 See petition, pp. 16-24. See also petitioners’ postconference brief, p. 28.

 33 See postconference brief of Lacquer Craft Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Markor International Furniture (Tianjin)

Manufacturing Co., and the Committee for Free Trade in Furniture (joint respondents’ postconference brief) at 7.

 34 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China, Investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Preliminary), USITC Pub. 3667,

January 2004, p. 11.

 35 Portions of this discussion are derived from the petition at 20-24, from petitioners’ postconference brief, pp. 13-

18, and from other sources as cited.

I-9

DOMESTIC LIKE PRODUCT ISSUES31

In the preliminary phase of the investigation, petitioners argued that the domestic like product

corresponded to the scope definition.32 Respondents Lacquer Craft Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Markor

International Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacturing Co. (Markor Tianjin); and the Committee for Free Trade

in Furniture indicated that they “. . . recognize that for purposes of its preliminary determination the

Commission does not have the data it would need to take a different approach to the like product issues

raised in this case, but want to reserve our position on these issues” should the investigation proceed to a

final phase.33 Other respondent parties did not take a position on the appropriate domestic like product. 

In its views in the preliminary phase of this investigation, the Commission found that there is one

domestic like product consisting of wooden bedroom furniture as defined in the scope of the

investigation.34 In the final phase of the investigation, respondents have not challenged the domestic like

product, with the exception of respondents Maria Yee Inc., Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings Ltd., and

Pyla HK Ltd. (collectively “Maria Yee”) who contend that joinery wooden bedroom furniture is a

separate like product from non-joinery wooden bedroom furniture.

Physical Characteristics and Uses35

Wooden bedroom furniture consists of furniture made of wood products and having physical

characteristics applicable to the intended use in a bedroom. The furniture consists of different individual

articles (e.g., beds, nightstands, chests, armoires, and dressers with mirrors) with different configurations

and uses, all of which share the physical characteristics imparted by their common raw material (wood) 

and by their intended function for use in a bedroom, as opposed to other types of furniture such as dining

room tables, china chests, and office desks. Figure I-1 presents examples of selected wooden bedroom

furniture pieces.

Wooden bedroom furniture is used primarily in residences, but is also used in lodging and in care

facilities such as assisted living facilities. Specific types of wooden bedroom furniture included in this

investigation are listed in the scope of the investigation presented earlier in this section of the report. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-10

Figure I-1

Examples of selected wooden bedroom furniture pieces

Bed Dresser

Tall chest Armoire

Nightstand Mirror

Source: Ethan Allen Inc. (www.ethanallen.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 36 In the furniture trade, the term “suites” is pronounced like the word “suits” as in bathing suits.

 37 Wooden bedroom suites can also be referred to as bedroom collections, bedroom groups, or bedrooms.

 38 See testimony of Harold Hewitt, President, Superior Furniture, conference transcript at 59.

 39 See joint respondents’ postconference brief, p. 8.

 40 For instance, in the New York market, a suite typically consists of a dresser, mirror, armoire, bed, and two

nightstands. However, in California, a suite typically consists of a dresser, mirror, bed, and two nightstands, while

in the southeastern United States, a suite typically consists of a dresser, mirror, chest, and bed. While there are

different ways of defining a suite across the country, retailers within a geographic region usually quote a suite in the

same way. See testimony of Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett, conference transcript at

116-117.

 41 See joint respondents’ postconference brief at 8.

 42 These materials, ranked in descending order, are: (1) solid wood; (2) solid wood veneer on plywood; (3) solid

wood veneer on particle board; and (4) paper glued on composite board. 

I-11

Wooden bedroom furniture is generally, but not exclusively, designed, manufactured, and offered

for sale in coordinated groups, commonly called bedroom suites36 or “bedrooms” in which all of the

individual pieces share the same basic design, raw materials, construction, and finish.37 Figure I-2

presents an example of a wooden bedroom furniture suite.

At a minimum, a suite includes a bed frame, chest of drawers, and a nightstand. As one furniture

retailer stated: “Although we are perfectly willing to sell different bedroom furniture items separately, the

vast majority of our customers, more than 90 percent, buy suites. This is the way virtually all retailers

operate.”38 Respondents agree that the fact that bedroom furniture is sold as a single unit or suite may be

true for many sales, but it is “most certainly not true for all,”39 indicating that the definition of a suite is

quite fluid (different suites may contain one or two nightstands, a chest or no chest, perhaps a mirror, and

a range of bed sizes) and even differs on a regional basis.40 Moreover, customers may buy a single piece

of furniture or any subset of the “so-called” suite.41 Wooden bedroom furniture suites are typically for

either the adult, youth, or hospitality markets. 

Adult bedroom suites are produced for at least three different price/quality points: low, middle,

and high. The quality of the material used in construction is a major factor that (along with other factors,

e.g., quality of construction and quality of finish) determines the price point at which the suites are sold.42

The materials found in the lowest category of bedroom suites tend to consist of (1) particle board

components for the interior structure that holds the drawers; (2) glued paper covering the interior of

drawers; (3) a certain amount of stapled construction; and (4) plastic components that are designed to look

similar to wood. The front of a chest or dresser is often covered with wood, while the sides are most

likely of particle board. Mid-priced bedroom suites usually include solid wood on the top of chests or

dressers, while wood veneered on the particle board is used on the side and front. A plywood interior

structure holds the drawers in place. High-priced bedroom suites normally use solid wood on drawer

fronts and the top and sides of chests and dressers.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-12

Figure I-2

Example of a wooden bedroom furniture suite

Wooden bedroom suite

Source: Kincaid Furniture (www.kincaidfurniture.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 43 See table D-1 in app. D for a compilation of U.S. producers’ responses to questions II-6 and II-8 of the

Commission’s U.S. producers’ questionnaire. Thirty-four of 49 producers indicated that they produce other products

using the same plant and equipment as used in the production of wooden bedroom furniture. Thirty-five of 49

producers indicated that they produced other products using the same production and related workers employed to

produce wooden bedroom furniture.

 44 See testimony of Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett, conference transcript at 78-79.

 45 See joint respondents’ postconference brief, p. 15.

 46 The Furniture/Product Manufacturing found at http://www.furniture-design-services.com/furniture_or_

product_manufacture.htm, retrieved on October 18, 2004.

I-13

Common Manufacturing Facilities and Production Employees

Wooden bedroom furniture is produced in facilities that may also produce non-bedroom wooden

furniture. In response to a question on whether they produce other products using the same equipment

and the same workers as those used to produce wooden bedroom furniture, most large producers

answered in the affirmative, stating that they produce other wooden furniture (e.g., dining room furniture,

occasional, entertainment centers, bookcases, and other case goods).43 With regard to bedroom furniture

of materials other than wood (e.g., brass beds), such furniture reportedly is not produced by the same U.S.

producers that produce wooden bedroom furniture.44

The process of manufacturing wooden bedroom furniture is similar in the United States, China,

and other producing countries. Lumber, veneers, and engineered wood products are sawed and/or cut into

shapes, furniture is assembled from those shapes, and the furniture is stained or painted, as needed, on a

finishing line.45

Manufacturing processes involved in the production of wooden bedroom furniture have been

increasingly automated. Computer-numerically-controlled equipment, which allows operators to input

complex, sequential demands instructing production machinery how to cut, rout, and/or carve different

furniture parts, has improved productivity. 

In the traditional method of bedroom furniture manufacturing, a prototype is made to serve as a

model for the furniture to be manufactured.46 To prepare the wood, logs are sawed into boards using a

large band saw/dimension saw machine. Next, the boards are dried (either naturally or through a kiln

dryer). If the boards are dried in a kiln dryer, they are first coated with a wood glue/white cement mixture

to prevent the wood from bending. This wood is then stored in a warehouse until it readjusts to the

surrounding atmosphere. The dried board is cut according to the required measurements, vertically with a

rip-saw and horizontally with a cross-cut saw. Some furniture manufacturers make decorative carvings

on the components (table tops, legs, etc.) at this stage. The wood is then softened through sanding and

planing. Next, these components are assembled using glue, nails, and/or bolts. Producers usually

conduct quality control inspections once components are assembled. The fully assembled furniture is

then finished through the process of spraying, drying, waxing, staining, and buffing. The wooden

bedroom furniture is labeled and packed to protect the product from damage while the furniture is stored

or shipped.

The manufacturing process for joinery wooden bedroom furniture, for which no nails are used, is

discussed in the section entitled Joinery Furniture at the end of Part I of this report.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 47 See testimony of Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett, conference transcript at 40; and 

testimony of Harold Hewitt, President, Superior Furniture, conference transcript at 62.

 48 See affidavit of Wyatt Bassett, petition, exh. 10, p. 1.

 49 See testimony of Jeffrey Seaman, President & CEO, Rooms To Go, conference transcript at 154.

 50 Other channels of distribution include sales to hospitality/institutional purchasers and distributors.

I-14

Interchangeability and Customer and Producer Perceptions

Wooden bedroom furniture generally is not interchangeable with other types of furniture such as

dining room tables, china cabinets, and office desks, which are essentially designed for use in rooms of

the house other than bedrooms. Wooden bedroom furniture is often sold as suites of compatible articles

of furniture that are designed for use in a bedroom. Of course, certain types of wooden bedroom furniture

(e.g., such as beds, nightstands, etc.) are different from each other in specific physical characteristics and

uses and are therefore not interchangeable. However, they are designed as an integrated unit to be

compatible in appearance and can be sold together as suites.

Some bedroom furniture is made of material other than wood, such as metal (e.g., brass beds). 

U.S. purchasers’ questionnaire responses regarding the substitution in demand in the retail market

between wooden bedroom furniture and bedroom furniture constructed of materials other than wood are

discussed in the section entitled Substitute Products in Part II of this report.

Part II of this report also contains information on the interchangeability between domestically

produced wooden bedroom furniture and such furniture produced in China and in other countries. In

general, the imported furniture is interchangeable with the domestically produced furniture, and is

sometimes a copy of the domestic product.47 Producers in China and elsewhere use generally the same or

comparable raw materials, production equipment, and manufacturing techniques as U.S. producers.48 In

fact, respondents argue that a significant amount of the wooden bedroom furniture imported from China

and other countries is imported by U.S. wooden bedroom producers and sold alongside domestically

produced wooden bedroom furniture, and that a significant portion of the imported wooden bedroom

furniture has even been designed in the United States by U.S. manufacturers.49

Channels of Distribution

Wooden bedroom furniture is generally sold in retail stores, as is non-bedroom furniture.50

Although non-bedroom furniture may be sold in the same stores, it is often displayed in a separate area of

the store. Retailers reserve what are known in the industry as “slots” (allocated space in a certain area of

a store) for bedroom suites, and it is these slots which serve as the primary channel of distribution for

wooden bedroom furniture. Further information on channels of distribution for wooden bedroom

furniture is presented in Part II and Part III of this report. 

Price

The Commission collected price data on eight specific types of wooden bedroom furniture,

consisting of various types of Louis Philippe-style and Mission-style beds, nightstands, and double

dressers. These data are presented in part V of this report. The prices among the individual types of

bedroom furniture (beds, nightstands, and dressers) often vary substantially. However, the products can 

be sold as suites. Joint respondents contend that wooden bedroom furniture is not priced on a suite-by-
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 51 See joint respondents’ postconference brief, p. 9.

 52 See letter to the Commission of Patricia P. Yeh, counsel to Maria Yee, regarding comments on the draft 

questionnaires, August 5, 2004; prehearing brief of Marie Yee, p. 9; and posthearing brief of Maria Yee, pp. 4 and 5.

 53 See responses to question II-9 of the Commission’s producer questionnaire; question II-6 of the importer

questionnaire; and question II-11 of the foreign producer/exporter questionnaire.

 54 Question II-30 of the Commission’s producer questionnaire, and question II-16 of the importer questionnaire.

 55 Joinery construction can involve the use of interlocking wood construction only or the additional use of glue or

sometimes metal connectors to finish the process. The most widespread joinery techniques are dowel, mortise and

tenon, tongue-in-groove, and dovetail. Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Education, “Fundamental

Construction Techniques for Furniture & Wooden Objects,” 2002, found at http://www.si.edu/scmre/takingcare/

fundconst.htm, retrieved October 14, 2004; Shirley M. Niemeyer, “Selecting Case Goods—Woods,” March 1996,

found at http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/homefurnish/g1247.htm, retrieved October 14, 2004; “Construction,”

Homestore.com, found at http://www.homestore.com/HomeGarden/Decorate/Furniture/Wood/Construction.asp?

poe=homestore, retrieved on October 14, 2004; “Types of Joinery,” FurnitureFIND.com, found at

http://www.furniturefind.com/education/2_030_joinery.aspx, retrieved October 14, 2004; “Construction Features,”

Furniture.com, found at http://www.furniture.com/Common/magazine/archives/construct_gloss.asp, retrieved

October 14, 2004.

 56 “Nails are one of the worst ways of holding separate pieces of wood together (conversely, they are also one of

the fastest and most efficient ways). . . . Glued joints {as used in joinery construction} are the most secure way of

holding separate pieces of wood together; if you think of the strength of a joint as a function of the amount of area

that is held tightly together, it doesn’t take much to realize that the area of a nail, a screw, or even a dowel, is much

smaller than a well executed joint.” “FAQ,” World Wood Works (Maui), found at http://www.worldwoodworks.com/

faqf.html, retrieved October 15, 2004. See “Services, Shipping, Warranty & Construction,” The Twigg Shoppe,

2004, found at http://www.thetwiggshoppe.com/ServicesShippingWarrantyConst.html, retrieved October 15, 2004;

Miller Dowel Company, found at http://millerdowel.com/company/, retrieved October 15, 2004.

I-15

suite basis, that price negotiations conducted by manufacturers are on a piece-by-piece basis, and that at

retail sale the goods are also priced individually.51

JOINERY FURNITURE

In the final phase of this investigation, Maria Yee requested that the Commission obtain separate

data for joinery wooden bedroom furniture, which is produced using the joinery technique in which solid

wood is assembled by expert craftsmen using precise and tightly fitting interlocking joints without the use

of nails or screws.52 The Commission’s questionnaires asked U.S. producers, U.S. importers, and foreign

producers in China whether or not they produced, imported, or exported joinery wooden bedroom

furniture.53 The Commission also asked U.S. producers and U.S. importers to comment on the

comparability of joinery wooden bedroom furniture and non-joinery wooden bedroom furniture.54

Construction of wooden bedroom furniture, at its core, involves multiple connections of pieces of

wood in one of two general ways: use of metal connectors (nails, screws, staples) or use of interlocking

construction, or joinery.55 The method used is largely dependent on a cost versus quality decision-making

process: metal connector construction of wooden furniture is generally cheaper and quicker and requires

less-skilled labor than the more labor-intensive joinery construction, but joinery construction of wooden

furniture is considered to produce more stable and longer-lasting furniture.56 Two examples of Maria

Yee’s joinery technique and assembly are presented in figure I-3. Selected examples of joinery wooden

bedroom furniture from several U.S. producers are presented in figure I-4.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-16

Figure I-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Examples of Maria Yee’s joinery design/technique and bed

Joinery design and technique

Bed

Source: Maria Yee, Inc. (http://www.mariayee.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-17

Figure I-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: Selected examples of joinery wooden bedroom furniture

Branch Hill Joinery

 Twin Hard Maple Dressers

Branch Hill Joinery

Twin Hard Maple Dressers

The Joinery Inc.

Versailles Collection

Southern Joinery

Mission Sleigh Bed

Southern Joinery

Shaker Dresser

Source: Branch Hill Joinery (www.branchhill.com); The Joinery Inc. (www.thejoinery.com); and Southern Joinery

(www.southernjoinery.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 57 Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Eduction, “Fundamental Construction Techniques for Furniture

& Wooden Objects,” 2002, found at http://www.si.edu/scmre/takingcare/fundconst.htm, retrieved October 14, 2004;

Shirley M. Niemeyer, “Selecting Case Goods—Woods,” March 1996, found at http://ianrpubs.unl.edu/homefurnish/

g1247.htm, retrieved October 14, 2004; Roger Sheldon, “Woodworking,” Encarta, found at http://encarta.msn.com/

text_761570306___8/Woodworking.html, retrieved October 15, 2004; “Construction,” Homestore.com, found at

http://www.homestore.com/HomeGarden/Decorate/Furniture/Wood/Construction.asp?poe=homestore, retrieved on

October 14, 2004; “Types of Joinery,” FurnitureFIND.com, found at http://www.furniturefind.com/education/

2_030_joinery.aspx, retrieved October 14, 2004; “Construction Features,” Furniture.com, found at

http://www.furniture.com/Common/magazine/archives/construct_gloss.asp, retrieved October 14, 2004.

 58 “FAQ,” World Wood Works (Maui), found at http://www.worldwoodworks.com/faqf.html, retrieved October 15,

2004; Miller Dowel Company, found at http://millerdowel.com/company/, retrieved October 15, 2004; Number Nine

Furniture Company, found at http://www.az.com/~gabe/menu.htm, retrieved October 15, 2004; Catherine Murrell,

“Amish-Made Furniture Has Customization, High Quality,” Courier-Journal.com, May 3, 2003, found at

http://www.courier-journal.com/reweb/community/interiors/2003/in20030503.html, retrieved October 14, 2004;

“Craftsmanship,” Dana Robes Wood Craftsman, found at http://www.danarobes.com/craftsmanship.htm, retrieved

October 15, 2004.

 59 Smithsonian Center for Materials Research and Eduction, “Fundamental Construction Techniques for Furniture

& Wooden Objects,” 2002, found at http://www.si.edu/scmre/takingcare/fundconst.htm, retrieved October 14, 2004.

 60 *** was requested to provide separate trade data for joinery wooden bedroom furniture. The firm has not

responded to the Commission staff’s request for such information. In describing its production of joinery wooden

bedroom furniture, ***. See petitioners’ prehearing brief, p. 11, fn. 21; and posthearing brief of Maria Yee, p. 7, fn.

1.

 61 Respondent Maria Yee identified several reported U.S. producers of joinery furniture. Posthearing brief of

Maria Yee, p. 7. Commission staff researched these firms and found that four–Branch Hill Joinery, Southern

Joinery, Andrews Furniture, and The Joinery—apparently produce joinery wooden bedroom furniture as described

above, based on the information provide on each firm’s web site. See cited company’s web sites, retrieved on

November 19, 2004. None of these firms was identified as a U.S. producer in the petition.

 62 The five U.S. importers reporting imports of joinery wooden bedroom furniture from January 2001-June 2004

were: ***. Respondent Maria Yee raised objections to these firms being considered importers of joinery wooden

bedroom furniture, stating “{o}ur review of the questionnaire responses, however, suggests that all but Maria Yee,

Inc. misconstrued the definition of joinery wooden bedroom furniture.” See prehearing brief of Maria Yee, p. 19.

 63 See table G-3 in app. G for a compilation of foreign producers’ responses to questions II-11 of the

Commission’s foreign producers’ questionnaire. The Chinese producers indicating that they exported joinery

wooden bedroom furniture to the United States were: ***.

I-18

A number of sources state that the method used to join two pieces of wood in the construction of

any wooden furniture will determine its quality and that joinery construction is superior to use of metal

connectors.57 Wooden furniture producers of smaller scale will tout their use of joinery construction as a

qualitative enticement to customers.58 One source states that joinery construction that traditionally was

not visible on the surface of wooden furniture is now shown for “decorative effect.”59

Only one responding U.S. producer, ***, indicated that it produced joinery wooden bedroom

furniture in the United States.60 61 Five U.S. importers reported importing joinery wooden bedroom

furniture from January 2001-June 2004.62 The Commission asked producers in China whether or not they

exported joinery wooden bedroom furniture to the United States since January 1, 2001. Six

producers/exporters in China reported exporting joinery wooden bedroom furniture to the United States

from January 2001 to June 2004.63
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 64 As referenced earlier, in response to *** Commission staff attempted to contact *** to confirm that the

company produced joinery wooden bedroom furniture as stated in its questionnaire response, as a question was

raised during the hearing regarding some respondents’ confusion about their production of solid wood furniture and

its relation to joinery construction. See testimony of Joseph Dorn, counsel for petitioners, hearing transcript at 107. 

*** did not respond by the report deadline.

 65 Two U.S. producers, ***, stated in their questionnaire responses that, although they do not produce joinery

wooden bedroom furniture, they do make furniture that is “very similar” or “all but indistinguishable” from joinery

furniture. Both producers also indicated that the manufacturing processes and channels of distribution for their

furniture and joinery furniture are the same, that customers perceive no difference between their higher-quality

furniture and joinery furniture, and that there is no meaningful or significant difference in price between their higherquality furniture and joinery furniture.

I-19

Of the 44 domestic producers that responded to a question on the comparability of joinery and

non-joinery wooden bedroom furniture, only one, ***, stated that it had produced joinery wooden

bedroom furniture since January 1, 2001.64 The company stated that ***.65

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 Although a few retailers are large, 80 percent of retailers have no more than four stores (testimony of Ken

Loring, President, Boston Interiors, hearing transcript at 59).

 2

 U.S. producers’ shipments to unrelated retailers were the largest channel of distribution, followed by shipments

to related retailers. The hospitality sector or distributors followed, depending on the year and whether the ranking is

based on pieces, pounds, or value (see table III-7). U.S. importers reported shipping product primarily to unrelated

retailers and related retailers, while distributors and the hospitality sector accounted for relatively small shares (see

table IV-4).

 3

 Furniture Brands International, posthearing brief, p. 2.

 4

 Petitioners remarked that producers pursuing blending strategies closed many domestic plants (petitioners’

posthearing brief, p. 10).

II-1

PART II: CONDITIONS OF COMPETITION IN THE U.S. MARKET

MARKET CHARACTERISTICS

Over 50 U.S. producers and over 100 importers supply the domestic market with wooden

bedroom furniture. Firms are organized in a variety of ways. Several producers are vertically integrated

through to the retail level. Some producers also import and sell both domestically produced and imported

wooden bedroom furniture. In general, producers and importers sell to retailers. Some large retailers

purchase directly from U.S. producers and/or from foreign exporters. Sales through retailers to final

consumers are the main channel of distribution,1

 but hotels and other large institutions are also important

final consumers of wooden bedroom furniture.2

 Large institutional consumers often contract with firms

specializing in design or in purchasing to write specifications and to contract for the purchase of furniture. 

Furniture rental firms comprise a smaller share of the market.

Responding purchasers were asked to identify the category that best described themselves, and 58

firms reported that they were retailers; 26 reported being distributors; one reported being a hospitality

firm; one reported being a furniture rental firm; and seven reported being in other categories. Most of

those in the other category were wholesalers or U.S. manufacturers that also purchase.

U.S. producers that also import were asked to state their reasons for importing. *** stated that

the low cost of Chinese wooden bedroom furniture was their reason for importing. A few producers

reported that certain styles with detailed carving were only available from China. Several importers,

which are not U.S. producers, responded that the subject product is available in the quality, quantity, and

time frame needed to service their dealers and that U.S. manufacturers never provided them comparable

quantities and service at any price. Furniture Brands International contends that its imports serve a

market segment that would largely be unserved were it not for the low-priced imports.3

 The petitioners

asserted that the domestic producers that source significant product from offshore had closed many

domestic plants.4

Several producers reported that wooden bedroom furniture is designed and marketed as suites,

and others reported that they generally sold individual pieces. *** reported that customers can buy any

piece separately except that mirrors are generally sold with dressers. Forty-six producers reported that, on

average, 50.7 percent of sales were by the piece and 49.3 percent were by suites, and 90 importers
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 5 Petitioners asserted that virtually all wooden bedroom furniture is promoted and sold in suites. They stated that

furniture is developed in collections and that retailers in different parts of the country select different components of

the collection to display in their showrooms (petitioners’ prehearing brief, exh. 1, p. 4).

 6

 Forty-one purchasers stated that all components of a suite are produced in the same country, and 18 replied that

they could be from different countries.

 7

 Changes tended to be in the direction of increasing imports; however, *** reported that changes occur yearly

based on the success of particular designs and on which items dealers are promoting, and *** reported that the

number of imported beds increased from 1998-2002 but had since decreased.

II-2

reported selling 66.5 percent by the piece and 33.5 by suites. Seventy-two purchasers reported that, on

average, 59.8 percent of their purchases were on a piece basis with the remainder on a suite basis.5

 

When asked if all pieces of a suite of wooden bedroom furniture are produced in the same

country, 16 producers replied affirmatively and 18 replied negatively; 41 importers responded

affirmatively and 12 responded negatively.6

 *** reported that a labor-intensive piece, such as a carved

headboard, is often manufactured in a low-cost country and a less complicated piece, such as a dresser or

chest, might be manufactured in the United States. It added that the ability to blend pieces from different

countries allowed it to benefit from each country’s advantages and that blending was a key factor in the

domestic industry’s ability to remain viable. When asked if the percentage of their firms’ blended sales

had changed since January 2001, 14 producers responded affirmatively and nine negatively; 19 importers

responded affirmatively and 32 negatively.7

 

Importers that also produce wooden bedroom furniture in the United States were asked if they

combine subject imports with U.S.-produced pieces and sell them as suites; 14 responded in the

affirmative and 14 in the negative. These firms were also asked if they had ceased production of certain

pieces in the United States and replaced them with items imported from China, and 16 firms responded in

the negative and 12 in the affirmative. *** stated that imported collections are usually new product

introductions and that it is rare to cease domestic production and simultaneously to begin importing the

same product. ***, however, stated that it now imports beds from China to match other pieces due to the

imports’ lower price. *** reported shifting production of some items to China to lower costs and remain

competitive. *** reported shifting production of an entire line to China ***. *** reported that it no

longer produces domestically but that it used to import pieces to match domestic production. 

Purchasers were asked to identify the major types of consumers to which they sell wooden

bedroom furniture. The most frequent answer was retailers, followed by end users. Many purchasers

reported targeting certain income groups or age levels. A few focused on low-income groups, with ***

selling primarily to inner-city stores. Most purchasers reported focusing on middle income groups or

value-conscious consumers. Some purchasers target upper-income levels; *** reported selling to upperincome customers and to designers. ***. A few purchasers focus on first and second-time homeowners.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 8 As an example of the depth of the market, several purchasers reported contacting 100 or more suppliers before

making a purchase, and it was not uncommon for purchasers to report contacting 20 or more suppliers, although

some only contacted three or four suppliers, and some purchasers had proprietary relationships with single suppliers. 

When asked if they had changed suppliers since January 2001, 59 purchasers reported that they had changed

suppliers, and 31 reported that they had not. Some purchasers reported large turnovers of suppliers. *** reported

that it made changes every six months, but did not keep records pertaining to previous suppliers. Purchasers

reported adding new Chinese and nonsubject firms and dropping domestic, subject, and nonsubject firms when

quality, style, or delivery did not meet their needs. The Coalition of Certain China Furniture Producers characterized

the U.S. market as intensely competitive in its prehearing brief (p. 2).

 9

 For example, *** (a producer that also imports) was cited as a price leader by 5 purchasers, *** (an importer)

was cited 4 times, *** (a producer) was cited twice, and 16 other firms were cited once. Nine purchasers, all of

which were also U.S. producers, alleged that importers of Chinese product were price leaders. Similarly, petitioners

alleged in their prehearing brief (exhibit 1, pp. 4-5) that importers of the subject product were price leaders. Ten

purchasers stated that there were no price leaders.

 10 Prehearing brief of the Furniture Retailers of America, p. 26. “Big box” stores allegedly account for a greater

share of retail sales.

 11 Ibid.

 12 All 39 responding U.S. producers reported that they did not sell wooden bedroom furniture over the internet. 

Five importers reported selling wooden bedroom furniture over the internet, and 86 reported that they did not sell

over the internet. None of the 92 responding purchasers reported buying wooden bedroom furniture over the

internet.

II-3

Although firm size and type of firm organization varies, the large number of market participants

suggests that the market for wooden bedroom furniture is competitive.8

 When purchasers were asked if

their firms competed for sales with manufacturers or importers from which they purchase wooden

bedroom furniture, 22 replied in the affirmative and 54 in the negative. When asked to list any firms

considered to be price leader, purchasers made a variety of responses, and no one firm or group of firms

emerged as the clear leaders, although several purchasers identified importers of Chinese wooden

bedroom furniture as price leaders.9

 *** stated that most firms price independently and that other firms

do not follow. *** stated that the market has many retailers and is very competitive, and *** stated that

no one supplier is dominate in pricing.

Some consolidation has occurred at the retail level, with some smaller retailers going out of

business.10 *** stated that more furniture is being sold through big box stores and more diverse retailers,

such as Wal-Mart, Costco, and Ikea. 

In some cases, large retailers have asked suppliers to develop private label furniture to enable the

retailer to differentiate its product from other retailers, and domestic producers have generally not agreed

to furnish private labels, although some importers do supply private-label furniture.11 U.S. producers

have, however, provided some retailers with exclusive designs in their geographic trading area.

With the predominance of marketing through retailers, the retail showroom remains the most

important venue for viewing and purchasing furniture. Virtually no purchasers, producers, or importers

reported that internet sales are important.12 ***, and a few other purchasers reported selling through mailorder catalogs. Other non-reporting companies also sell through mail-order catalogs.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 13 Financial data indicate that variable costs are in excess of 70 percent of total production costs. Also see

petitioners’ prehearing brief, pp. 28-29.

 14 Plant closing are listed in exhibit 32 of the petitioners’ prehearing brief, and petitioners allege that subject

imports contributed to these closings (testimony of Joseph Dorn, counsel for petitioners, hearing transcript at 10).

 15 Furniture Brands International, prehearing brief, p. 9. It claimed that plant closings had resulted in an industrywide improvement in efficiency.

 16 Lacquer Craft alleged that some types of wood furniture could not be efficiently produced in the United States

and that most producers recognize that blending imports with domestic production is a rational strategy (Lacquer

Craft’s prehearing brief, p. 3-4). Petitioners claimed that all types of wooden bedroom furniture can be

manufactured in the United States and that computerized carvers can efficiently produce pieces identical to Chinese

hand-carving (testimony of Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett, hearing transcript at 40).

II-4

U.S. SUPPLY OF DOMESTICALLY PRODUCED WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE

Marginal production costs in relation to the market clearing price are the primary determinant of

supply. Capacity utilization, availability of alternative markets, and production efficiency affect the

supply response. 

Domestic capacity was 17.3 million pieces during 2003, which was down 2.9 percent from the

level in 2001. Capacity utilization based on pieces ranged from 77.2 percent in 2001 to 72.7 percent in

2003. The ratio of inventories to shipments ranged from 12.8 percent in 2001 to 14.0 percent during

January-June 2004. Exports ranged from 1.5 to 1.8 percent of total U.S. shipments by value; this

indicates that U.S. producers have little opportunity to use other markets to shift supply.

Firms typically produce positive output along their marginal cost curve when the market price

exceeds their average variable costs. The wooden bedroom furniture industry has high variable costs

relative to fixed costs.13 When the market clearing price drops below a firm’s average variable costs, that

firm will likely choose to cease operations. In an industry with high variable costs and low fixed costs,

plant closings may be more common than in an industry with high fixed costs. In this regard, petitioners

stated that U.S. producers had closed over 65 plants.14 Furniture Brands International stated that it closed

some plants because they were antiquated and inefficient, not because of imports, and that it made capital

expenditures to improve the efficiency of its remaining plants.15 Conversely, high fixed costs would not

serve as a barrier to entry in this type of industry. Thus, other factors being equal, an industry with low

fixed costs would be expected to adjust capacity in response to changes in demand more readily than a

high fixed cost industry.

Efficiency indicators were generally positive.16 Pieces produced per thousand hours increased

from 223.4 in 2001 to 256.6 in 2003. During January-June 2004, pieces produced per hour were 259.3

compared to 244.8 during the similar period in 2003. Unit labor costs were down from $53.76 per piece

in 2001 to $49.63 in 2003, although hourly wages increased during this time. The unit cost of goods sold

decreased by 7.4 percent between 2001 and 2003 and by 3.9 percent between January-June 2003 and

January-June 2004.

In the short term, U.S. producers of wooden bedroom furniture are likely to respond to changes in

prices with large changes in the quantity shipped to the U.S. market. Availability of some idle capacity,

ability to adjust capacity, some existing inventories, and relatively positive efficiency indicators

contribute to this response. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 17 Petitioners’ prehearing brief, pp. 60-62 and exh. 1, pp. 5-6. Petitioners allege that between 30,000 and 300,000

producers comprise the Chinese wooden bedroom furniture industry and that additional capacity is planned.

 18 The seven mandatory respondents selected by Commerce account for over 40 percent of subject imports by

value (Lacquer Craft’s prehearing brief, p. 24).

 19 “Monitoring of the Chinese Furniture Sector,” Union Europeenne de L’Ameublement (March 2000) and Dian

Shen and Merry Cao, “Furniture Sales,” U.S. Foreign and Commercial Service and U.S. Department of State (1999)

included in the prehearing brief of the Coalition of Certain China Furniture Producers, exhs. 3 and 4. Apparently

better-off consumers in large cities and certain coastal areas purchase export-quality furniture. Ethan Allen and Ikea

have stores in China to serve this market segment (testimony of Matthew Jaffe, counsel for the Coalition of Certain

Chinese Furniture Producers, hearing transcript at 225). The majority of Chinese consumers purchase furniture

made for the Chinese market that is of lower quality, is less expensive, and has smaller dimensions. Many small

firms produce for this market segment. 

 20 Chinese furniture manufacturers can, allegedly, add capacity at a cost of $3 to $4 per square foot compared to a

cost of $15 per square foot in the United States. “U.S. Furniture Industry Is Rocked by Chinese Imports,”

Manufacturing & Technology News (July 3, 2003), included in petitioners’ prehearing brief, exhibit 40.

 21 Robert L. Lacy, “Whither North Carolina Furniture Manufacturing?” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

Working Paper No. 04-07 (September 2004) included in the prehearing brief of the Coalition of Certain China

Furniture Producers, exh. 1. He estimated that labor productivity remains low in China despite recent improvements

in automation and privatization. However, productivity is improving, and new furniture plants in China have

equipment comparable or superior to that in North Carolina. Harvey Dondero stated that the labor content of

wooden bedroom furniture produced in the United States was approximately 50 percent compared to 10 percent for

subject imports from China (testimony of Harvey Dondero, President, Universal Furniture International, hearing

transcript at 200-201).

II-5

U.S. SUPPLY OF IMPORTED WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE

Subject Imports from China

Reported Chinese capacity was *** million pieces in 2003, which was more than double the level

in 2001. Chinese capacity was up *** percent during January to June of 2004 compared to the similar

period the previous year. Capacity utilization ranged from *** percent to *** percent. China’s home

market and internal consumption accounted for *** percent of total shipments in 2001, and this level fell

to *** percent of total shipments in 2003; this figure was *** percent during January to June of 2004

compared to *** percent for the similar period the previous year. China’s exports to the United States

grew from *** percent of total Chinese shipments in 2001 to *** percent in 2003. Exports to third

countries decreased from *** percent of total shipments in 2001 to *** percent in 2003; this figure was

*** percent and *** percent, respectively, in January-June 2003 and January-June 2004.

Petitioners asserted that there are tens of thousands of Chinese producers and that Chinese

capacity greatly exceeds the figure derived from the approximately 150 foreign producer questionnaires

received by the Commission.17 Lacquer Craft contends that a smaller number of large producers account

for most U.S. imports from China.18 The Coalition of Certain China Furniture Producers maintains that

many Chinese producers are small and cannot produce export-quality furniture, although the number of

producers making export-quality goods has grown.19 

Because the furniture industry has low fixed costs, Chinese producers can easily expand

production.20 Another component of China’s supply response relates to its low labor costs, which by one

estimate were about 4 percent of those in the United States, although productivity in China was also

lower.21
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 22 Prehearing brief of the Coalition of Certain China Furniture Producers, p. 8, and previously cited exhs. 3 and 4.

 23 Between 2001 and 2003, imports from Malaysia more than doubled, and those from Vietnam, which started

from a very low base, increased more than 50 times. Petitioners objected to this characterization and stated that in

absolute terms China was, by far, the dominant importer.

 24 See testimony of Lynn Chipperfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, Furniture Brands

International, hearing transcript at 197.

II-6

Chinese manufacturers have the ability to access their own domestic market and a number of

foreign markets, and the U.S. market has been very important to Chinese manufacturers. The Coalition of

Certain China Furniture Producers stated that increasing domestic income and reforms to facilitate home

ownership are expected to increase domestic Chinese demand.22

The large size of the Chinese wooden bedroom furniture industry, its ability to expand

production, and its low labor costs increase its ability to respond to price changes. Considering these

factors together with potentially dampening factors, such as increasing demand in China and low

productivity, suggests that there likely would be large changes in the quantity of subject shipments from

China to the U.S. market in response to changes in the price of wooden bedroom furniture.

Nonsubject Imports

A limited amount of information is available concerning nonsubject supply, but the large number

of countries that supply wooden bedroom furniture to the United States suggests that the nonsubject

supply response may be moderate to large.23 The share of apparent consumption attributed to nonsubject

countries was approximately 30 percent in 2003. Major nonsubject sources include Brazil, Canada,

Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, and Vietnam. New capacity in central Europe was also reported to be

on the rise. Since 2001, imports of wooden bedroom furniture from Malaysia and Vietnam realized large

percentage increases between 2001 and 2003, but overall nonsubject imports increased by only *** 

percent between 2001 and 2003. Respondents allege that new capacity is now coming on line in Vietnam

and some other Asian countries in response to the expected duties on subject imports from China.24

U.S. DEMAND

Demand Characteristics

The demand for wooden bedroom furniture is a price-quantity relationship that is influenced by

consumer tastes, personal income, and demographics. The demand for housing and for hotel rooms

affects the demand for wooden bedroom furniture. Marketing influences consumer tastes, and most

wooden bedroom furniture continues to be marketed through retailers, as producers, importers, and

purchasers all reported that internet sales are a relatively minor amount of overall sales. Thus, how

retailers allocate floor space affects sales. Other factors affecting demand are perceived quality, brand

names, and availability of substitutes. Because tastes vary, wooden bedroom furniture comes in a wide

variety of styles, qualities, and prices.

Producers were asked if the U.S. demand for wooden bedroom furniture had changed since

January 1, 2001. Twenty-nine producers reported that demand had increased; six reported that it had

decreased; and six reported that it had not changed. Producers mentioned the strong housing market and,
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 25 Lynn Chipperfield of Furniture Brands International, one of the few producers claiming that demand decreased,

stated that as many as 850 smaller retailers had gone out of business and that larger retailers are putting pricing

pressure on suppliers (testimony of Lynn Chipperfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer,

Furniture Brands International, hearing transcript at 193-194, and Furniture Brands International’s prehearing brief,

pp. 3-4). He noted that 2001 was a very bad year, so that increases relative to a low starting point still mean that

demand was depressed, although Census data show that retail sales of all furniture fell by only 0.3 percent in 2001

compared to 2000 (Furniture Brands International, posthearing brief, p. 10). Petitioners dispute this allegation and

state that Commerce data show that disposable personal income and expenditures on furniture and household

equipment increased between the first quarter of 2001 and the second quarter of 2004 (petitioners’ prehearing brief,

exhibit 8). Petitioners further assert that furniture superstores are replacing domestic wooden bedroom furniture with

similar subject imports (testimony of Ken Loring, President, Boston Interiors, hearing transcript at 59).

 26 *** stated that consumers currently appear less willing to buy expensive bedroom furniture compared to before

2001. *** stated that uncertainty in the job market and weak financial markets had contributed to a decline in

middle- and higher-priced furniture. *** reported that, despite the growth in overall demand, the demand for their

firms’ products had decreased because of low-priced imports.

 27 *** stated that more pieces of wooden bedroom furniture had been sold and that this was attributable to

population and housing growth and the availability of high-quality, low-cost imports. *** added that better quality,

more varied styles, and better prices were factors in the increase. *** stated that Chinese veneers and carving

techniques, not available in the United States, provide consumers with more style choices at a better value. ***

stated that the lack of consumer confidence had decreased high-price purchases and that furniture competes for

consumer income with the auto, electronics, and travel industries, which advertise more. *** reported that it had

experienced double-digit growth since 2001 by offering high-quality, medium-priced furniture. *** reported that it

had increased sales by expanding the number of styles offered. *** stated that improved finishes and varieties and

knock-down capability to offset ocean freight were factors in increasing demand. 

II-7

in particular, the number of new housing starts as reasons for the increase.25 Some producers stated that

demand in the hospitality sector had declined since the events of September 11, 2001, but that this was a

smaller segment of the market.26

Forty-seven importers reported that demand had increased since January 1, 2001; eight reported

that it had decreased; and 24 reported that it was unchanged.27 *** reported that industry statistics show

significant increases in the number of pieces sold. It reported that purchases of bedroom furniture are

highly discretionary and that increased prices will likely cause consumers to shift to purchases of other

goods. Many importers mentioned that, since the recession in 2001, the number of housing starts had

picked up and that a slow recovery had followed and led to increases in demand.

Purchasers were similarly asked how demand had changed since January 2001; 46 reported that it

had increased; 6 reported that it had decreased; and 32 reported that it had remained the same. ***

reported that the housing boom had led to an increase in demand and that importers were offering

affordable styles. It added that styles and types of furniture had been updated since 2001 and that the

greater number of styles had drawn new low- and middle-income purchasers into the market. ***

reported that demand had decreased more for U.S. products and for higher-priced merchandise.

Purchasers were asked to report the effect on overall demand of the presence of Chinese wooden

bedroom furniture on the market. *** stated that imports from China had resulted in a greater number of

designs being available to a larger number of low- and middle-income consumers. *** reported that there

was no effect in the mid-to-upper tier, but that prices are more favorable to the consumer in the lower tier. 

*** reported that imports from China had not changed overall demand, but that customers had received

better quality furniture for the same or a lower price than was previously available. A number of

purchasers including *** reported that the presence of Chinese wooden bedroom furniture had not
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 28 Petitioners’ prehearing brief, exhibit 1, p. 10.

 29 Producers and importers were asked if certain subject imports are copies of U.S.-produced wooden bedroom

furniture. Twenty-four producers agreed that certain imports are copies and 18 producers disagreed, whereas 23

importers agreed and 43 importers disagreed. *** stated that the Chinese competition can make any wooden

bedroom group that it manufactures and has, in fact, copied several of its lines for ***. *** added that most

bedroom furniture made in China is a replica of what is already made in the United States. *** stated that, in

general, styles of furniture are variations and combinations of design elements that have existed for years. *** stated

that the vast majority of styles are not American-designed, rather designs are cyclical and have been around for

centuries. *** stated that manufacturers in the United States, China, and other countries produce similar styles, but

that although the styles may be similar, they are not exact duplicates. Ken Loring of Boston Interiors stated that

imports from China are copies of domestic products and are directly replacing the domestic product at large retailers

(testimony of Ken Loring, President, Boston Interiors, hearing transcript at 59).

II-8

affected overall U.S. demand. Petitioners also argued that apparent consumption grew at approximately

the same rate as the growth in housing starts and that if low-priced imports were driving demand, then

apparent consumption should have grown at a much greater rate.28

The Commission asked U.S. producers, importers, and purchasers if there had been significant

changes in the product range or marketing of wooden bedroom furniture since January 2001, and 15

producers responded affirmatively and 22 responded negatively. *** stated that the furniture industry is a

fashion business and that styles keep pace with changing consumer taste. It added that no revolutionary

changes had occurred in products or marketing. *** reported that retailers are increasingly purchasing

directly from China. It added that the Chinese are copying unique designs and that products have a

shorter life-cycle, which has led to increased research and development costs and greater discounting.29

*** concurred that product lives significantly shortened over the last 3 years, which increased costs. ***

reported that it has an aggressive program to develop new bedroom products. *** stated that it had been

forced to introduce new designs more frequently and that its inventory of previously designed suites had

increased and that these had to be sold at discount prices. *** reported that cherry finishes by Chinese

manufacturers had flooded the market and forced it to drop 40 percent of its cherry line.

Fifty importers reported that no significant changes in product range or marketing of wooden

bedroom furniture had occurred since January 2001, and 38 reported that there had been significant

changes. *** reported that Vietnam, Malaysia, and China have greater flexibility in manufacturing than

U.S. firms and that the foreign firms use more species of wood and a greater number of colors and stains. 

*** expanded its product line with imports from China that have intricate carvings and complex veneers. 

It also believes that less money is spent on advertising for furniture and that this has contributed to

softness in the domestic market because furniture purchases are highly discretionary. *** reported that

there is more bedroom furniture with heavy carvings and mixed media (metal, leather, wicker, bamboo,

and rattan). *** reported that the product range in the low end had increased and that ready-to-assemble

furniture had increased. *** stated that there are many more producers worldwide in such countries as

China, Indonesia, Malaysia, South America, Mexico, and Canada. *** reported that a significant change

is the capability of Chinese exporters to provide retailers with containers of mixed products. This practice

allows retailers to buy less of each product and still fill a container; it allows smaller firms to buy direct

from China and avoid U.S. warehouse and shipping costs. *** reported that consumers are purchasing

more transitional and contemporary styles than before.

Forty-six purchasers reported that there were no significant changes in product range or

marketing and 39 reported that significant changes had occurred. *** reported that there was greater

competitiveness in the good and better ranges. *** reported that prices had decreased in all price ranges. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 30 Price differences are discussed in Part V.

II-9

*** reported that it was now offering better furniture in the middle price range. *** reported that

consumers are far less willing to spend disposable income on very expensive bedroom sets when quality

products are available at a lower price. *** stated that consumers today have more choices in style,

design, and type of product than in 2001. *** reported that Chinese producers are copying unique

designs more quickly. *** reported that Chinese manufacturers are offering products with more detailed

and intricate work. *** stated that imports from China and other countries have more intricate carvings

and sophisticated finishes. It added that customers are willing to pay a little more for these types of

furniture and that *** has expanded its import program to include these types of items. *** stated that it

has greatly reduced prices because of imports from China and that it is continually developing new

products to sell at near cost in order to remain competitive.

Quality Tiers

The Commission asked purchasers if there are different tiers within the retail market for wooden

bedroom furniture. Out of 82 responding purchasers, 77 replied in the affirmative with the remainder in

the negative. *** stated that furniture retailing is very fragmented and that price, quality, and

functionality are the main factors affecting sales. *** stated that there are consumer-driven categories

based on age, affluence, and taste. Many purchasers reported that there are three categories, such as good,

better, and best, which are distinguished by price, quality, and the materials used. *** stated that there

are many different tiers from the cheapest to the most expensive special order.

Purchasers were asked what differentiates the tiers besides price,30 and the following factors were

cited: size, details, materials, workmanship, finish, brand, wood, drawer construction. *** stated that

“good quality” denotes furniture that is small, has no dust-proofing between drawers, 5-to-7-step finishes,

and masonite backs stapled on; “better quality” has dust-proofing on the bottom drawers at least, some

curves, better veneer, hand carving, 7-to-12-step finishes, plywood backs that are screwed on, dovetail

construction on drawers, and wood on gliders; “best quality” is larger, has wood-banded tops, dustproofing on each row of drawers, some marble tops, curves and shape, extensive veneer, multistep

finishes, dovetail construction on drawers, hard wood drawers on guides, and screw-on wood back panels. 

*** stated that good quality wooden bedroom furniture is small scale, made of particle board, and has

little or no veneer; better quality is medium scale and has less particle board and more veneer; best quality

is large scale, almost entirely wood, and has intricate veneer work. *** stated that good quality has basic

features, small size, no dust panel, and a print finish; better quality has more size, a better finish that only

has minimal print finish, and better woods; best quality has intricate details and styling, the best veneer

matching, and exotic woods.

Purchasers were also asked to estimate the percentage of their firms’ total purchases of wooden

bedroom furniture in the good, better, and best categories. Purchasers indicated that, on average, 32.1

percent, 45.4 percent, and 22.5 percent were, respectively, in the good, better, and best categories.

Joinery furniture, which could be viewed as a type of high-end furniture, is fully finished and

made of solid wood (with no particle board, fiberboard, manufactured board, or veneer). It is assembled

by hand using joinery techniques without any nails, screws, staples, or other fasteners, but may

incorporate metal hardware for decorative or non-structural purposes. Purchasers were asked to compare

joinery wooden bedroom furniture with non-joinery wooden bedroom furniture. *** reported that joinery

is distinctive in quality, construction, materials, and style; it is functionally the same as other furniture but

different in materials, looks, and workmanship; and it is higher in quality and price and requires a more
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-10

skilled work force. *** stated that some customers perceive that solid wood is superior to veneer and that

some suppliers market solid wood as superior. It stated that solid wood products are frequently produced

separately from non-joinery furniture and that solid wood has a 10- to 15-percent price premium. It

added that the visual characteristics and end uses are similar and that both types of furniture are marketed

through similar channels of distribution. *** stated that customers prefer joined products, but that they

require greater skill to produce and cost more.

Brand Names

Producers and importers were asked if they sold wooden bedroom furniture under brand names;

32 producers reported that they did and 15 producers reported that they did not. Forty-seven importers

reported that they sold under brand names, and 38 importers reported that they did not. Most producers

that sell under brand names reported that 100 percent of their sales are brand-name sales and that the

percentage had not changed since January 2001. Although there were a few exceptions, importers tended

to sell either entirely under brand names or not to sell brand names, and their shares tended not to have

changed since January 2001.

Purchasers were asked if they sold wooden bedroom furniture under brand names; 53 reported

that they did and 36 reported that they did not. Purchasers were also asked how often brand names are

important in their firm’s sales of wooden bedroom furniture. Eight purchasers responded that they were

always important; 13 reported that they were usually important; 31 reported that they were sometimes

important; and 36 reported that they were never important.

Floor Space

Purchasers that are retailers reported that they allocate floor space based on price, quality, design,

style, availability, brand names, and the overall likelihood that the item will sell. Some retailers stated

that they try to offer different price points that appeal to a variety of consumers. *** reported that it

attempts to allocate 50 percent of its floor space to good quality furniture, 30 percent to better quality, and

20 percent to the best quality. Several retailers stated that they have no pre-set arrangements, rather

pieces that sell remain on the floor, while others are removed. Experience with suppliers, their track

record, and the reliability of supply were also important in allocating floor space. Thus, the demand for

floor space is derived from the final demand for wooden bedroom furniture.

Purchasers that are retailers were asked if the portion of floor space allotted to domestic wooden

bedroom furniture had increased, decreased, or remained the same relative to the floor space allotted to

Chinese wooden bedroom furniture since 2001. Five purchasers reported that it had increased, 21

reported that it had decreased, and 25 reported that it had remained the same. *** reported that the

combination of styles, quality, and value of the Chinese product was superior to the domestic product, and

it therefore allocated more space to the imported product. *** stated that fewer products are now

available domestically and that more quality products are currently available from a variety of sources. In

a similar vein, *** reported that domestic floor space decreased because there are fewer domestic sources

to choose from and imports are a better value.

U.S. producers were asked if their firms had lost floor space at retailers to importers of the subject

product from China since January 2001. Twenty-five producers reported that they had lost floor space

and 16 reported that they had not. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 31 Apparent consumption is discussed in Part IV. Although purchasers’ reported data account for only part of

apparent consumption, trends are generally similar.

II-11

U.S. importers of subject product were asked if they had lost floor space to domestically

produced wooden bedroom furniture since January 2001. Eight importers reported losing floor space to

the domestic product and 58 importers reported that they had not lost such floor space.

Substitute Products

Purchasers identified similar products made from high-density synthetic materials, iron, other

metals, composite materials, upholstered materials, and wicker as substitutes for wooden bedroom

furniture. Metal products were the most commonly mentioned substitute. *** stated, however, that few

consumers view metal beds as substitutes for wooden beds. Some other products were identified as

potential substitutes, such as end tables for nightstands, entertainment centers for armoires, and futons for

beds. Purchasers were also asked if changes in the prices of substitutes had affected the prices of wooden

bedroom furniture, and 42 out of 51 purchasers stated that prices of the potential substitutes had no effect. 

*** stated that it considered the other products as being competitive on price, although it had no specific

data to support its view.

Consumption

Quantities and values of purchases provided by reporting purchasers generally increased for

Chinese and nonsubject sources between 2001 and 2003; purchases from China more than doubled

between 2001 and 2003 (table II-1).31 Annual quantities of purchases from the United States increased,

but decreased in the two interim periods by smaller amounts, and the value of purchases from U.S.

sources decreased for all periods.

Table II-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: Reported purchases,1

 by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and JanuaryJune 2004

Source

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

United States 2,082,900 2,329,600 2,397,301 1,283,376 1,092,573

China 1,543,589 2,231,370 3,305,409 1,606,231 1,673,941

Nonsubject 2,663,660 2,790,028 3,828,136 1,775,770 2,165,520

Value ($1,000)

United States 378,438 367,151 361,593 188,556 150,583

China 228,139 326,499 510,228 266,088 276,319

Nonsubject 273,746 285,173 341,994 171,539 204,436

 1 Responding purchasers accounted for less than a third of the value of apparent U.S. consumption of wooden bedroom

furniture in 2003.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 32 Similar tables are shown for producers (table III-6) and importers (table IV-3).

II-12

Purchasers also reported the quantities purchased of individual pieces (table II-2). Between 2001

and 2003 and the two interim periods, the quantities purchased generally increased.32 Dressers/chests of

drawers were the most-purchased item. After dressers/chests of drawers, beds and then nightstands/night

tables were the next most purchased items. The fact that quantities are not equal for all items, particularly

for armoires, indicates that the components of purchased suites may vary by regions of the country and

that items are not always purchased as suites.

Table II-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Reported purchases,1

 by selected pieces, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 2004, as reported by purchasers

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Beds2 1,104,560 1,622,450 2,200,051 1,102,166 1,163,265

Dressers/chest of drawers 1,824,192 1,843,193 2,404,233 1,231,890 1,345,898

Nightstands/night tables 1,103,769 1,336,030 1,714,631 865,972 970,186

Armoires3 250,677 341,738 529,701 268,732 311,504

All other pieces 623,597 686,985 978,344 471,914 464,918

Total purchases 4,906,795 5,830,396 7,826,960 3,940,674 4,255,771

Share (percent)

Beds2 22.5 27.8 28.1 28.0 27.3

Dressers/chest of drawers 37.2 31.6 30.7 31.3 31.6

Nightstands/night tables 22.5 22.9 21.9 22.0 22.8

Armoires3 5.1 5.9 6.8 6.8 7.3

All other pieces 12.7 11.8 12.5 12.0 10.9

Total purchases 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

 1 Responding purchasers accounted for less than half of the volume (in pieces) of apparent consumption of wooden bedroom

furniture in 2003. 2

 A bed is defined as a headboard, with or without any combination of related pieces such as a footboard, side rails, and

canopy, with a bed considered a single piece whether it contains one or more separate pieces. Bunk beds are considered two

beds and therefore are two pieces. 3

 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more drawers

(either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold television receivers and/or other audio-visual entertainment

systems.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-13

SUBSTITUTABILITY ISSUES

Substitution between domestic and imported wooden bedroom furniture depends upon quality,

styles, relative prices, the conditions of sale, types of customers, and product differentiation. Based on

available data, staff believes that domestic and subject imported wooden bedroom furniture is generally

substitutable at least in the market segment aimed at low- and middle-income consumers, but there also

appears to be some product differentiation that will moderate the degree of substitution to some extent

between the U.S.-produced and subject imported product.

Factors Affecting Purchases and Sales

Purchasers were asked to list the three major factors, in order of their importance, that they

consider in deciding from whom to purchase wooden bedroom furniture. Quality and price were cited

most frequently (table II-3).

Table II-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Ranking of factors used in purchasing decisions, as reported by U.S.

purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

Number one factor Number two factor Number three factor

Availability 1 4 14 

Capability 0 5 1 

Consistency 1 7 6 

Delivery 0 10 9 

Design 12 4 1 

Price 24 16 16 

Quality 29 23 13 

Reliability 1 4 14 

Style 8 2 2 

Value 8 4 1 

Other 6 9 9 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Purchasers were asked to report the characteristics that determine the quality of wooden bedroom

furniture. A wide variety of characteristics was reported, including overall appearance, clarity of finish,

the veneers selected, the quality of the woodworking, drawer construction, stability, metal hardware,

durability, style, wood species, stability of gluing in solid wood, safety, ease of use, fit of the doors,

packaging, dovetailing of drawers, dust-proofing between drawers, and type of substrates. Other

purchasers were more general and said that if the product is manufactured to their engineering

specifications, then it is acceptable and that ultimately it has to meet the customer’s expectations.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 33 Out of 93 responding purchasers, 88 purchasers reported that they are always or usually aware whether the

wooden bedroom furniture they are purchasing is domestically produced or imported, and 79 purchasers reported

being always or usually aware of the manufacturer.

II-14

Most purchasers reported that they are aware if the product they are purchasing is U.S.-produced

or imported, and most were similarly aware of the manufacturer.33 Purchasers’ perception was that 48.4

percent of buyers are always or usually interested in the country of origin and that 51.6 percent are

sometimes or never interested in the country of origin of the product that they are procuring. When asked

how often their firm purchases wooden bedroom furniture that is offered at the lowest price, 3, 18, 40,

and 26 purchasers reported that they, respectively, always, usually, sometimes, or never purchase wooden

bedroom furniture that is offered at the lowest price.

Purchasers were asked if they required suppliers to become certified or prequalified with respect

to some performance characteristic of wooden bedroom furniture. Out of 90 responding purchasers, 33

reported that they required qualification for all of their purchases; 13 reported requiring qualification for

some part of their purchases; and 44 reported not requiring any type of qualification. When asked if any

domestic or foreign producer had failed to qualify since January 2001, 58 purchasers responded

negatively and 20 responded affirmatively. Several purchasers mentioned Chinese firms that did not

qualify because of poor quality or failure to deliver on time; a few purchasers also stated that some

domestic and nonsubject firms had not qualified at least in some product lines. Several firms stated that

dropping a supplier was based on actual experience instead of a formal qualification procedure.

Purchasers were asked to rate the importance of 16 purchase factors in their decision to buy

wooden bedroom furniture (table II-4). Availability, delivery time, lowest price, product consistency,

quality meets industry standards, and the reliability of supply appear to be the most important factors.

Comparisons of Domestic Products and Imports from China

U.S. producers and importers were asked to report the shares of their firms’ sales in 2003 that

were from inventory and that were produced to order, and the lead times for each category. Simple

averages suggest that the domestic industry had approximately a 67-33 split in favor of sales from

inventory and that importers had a slightly higher share of sales from inventory (table II-5). Lead times

for sales from inventory averaged 14.9 days for producers and 18.5 days for importers. Lead times for

sales produced to order averaged 44.5 days for producers and 81.2 days for importers.

Purchasers were asked if wooden bedroom furniture produced in the United States and China is

used interchangeably. Thirty-five firms reported that they are always used interchangeably; nine firms

reported that they are frequently used interchangeably; 15 firms reported that they are sometimes used

interchangeably, and 14 firms reported that they are never used interchangeably. *** stated that, although

wooden bedroom furniture from all countries is technically interchangeable, consumer preferences,

quality, and value guide the purchase decision. It stated that imported wooden bedroom furniture from

China and other countries is often better in quality than is available from the United States at a similar

price.

Purchasers were asked if they ever ordered wooden bedroom furniture specifically from one

country over other possible sources of supply. Sixty-seven purchasers responded in the negative and 21

in the affirmative. Countries cited include China, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines,

Thailand, Vietnam, and the United States. Several purchasers stated that the decision is not specific to a

country but specific to a supplier.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-15

Table II-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: Importance of purchase factors, as reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

Very important Somewhat important Not important

Availability 69 20 4 

Brand names 8 20 62 

Delivery terms 36 44 13 

Delivery time 64 28 1 

Discounts offered 31 42 18 

Extension of credit 18 34 39 

Lowest price 66 27 0 

Minimum quantity requirements 21 40 30 

Packaging 58 30 4 

Product consistency 80 12 0 

Quality meets industry standards 73 15 3 

Quality exceeds industry standards 43 34 13 

Product range 20 47 23 

Reliability of supply 80 10 3 

Technical support/service 29 42 20 

U.S. transportation costs 27 37 26 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Table II-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: Share of sales from inventory and produced to order, and lead times

Type Source

Share Lead time

Percent Days

Producers From inventory 67.1 14.9 

Produced to order 32.9 44.5 

Importers From inventory 70.7 18.5 

Produced to order 29.3 81.2 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 34 Seven producers reported that certain styles or types of wooden bedroom furniture are imported from China

that are not produced in the United States, and 30 producers reported that there are not. When posed the similar

question, 32 importers replied that there are different styles or types from China, and 45 replied that there are not. 

U.S. producer *** stated that all types produced in China could be produced in the United States, but that it was

ultimately a cost-price decision. *** stated that certain labor-intensive styles imported from China cannot be

replicated in the United States because they require detailed carving and intricate finishing work. It added that if it

produced these items domestically it would not be able to sell them at all because the labor component would price

them out of the market. (This assertion is contradicted by Wyatt Bassett in footnote 16.) *** stated that some

imported styles may not be produced in the United States, but it cannot readily identify them because the array of

designs and styles is too vast.

 35 Clarence Ridley, Chairman, Haverty Furniture Companies, hearing transcript at 212-213.

II-16

Purchasers were asked if certain types, sizes, or styles of wooden bedroom furniture were only

available from a single source. There were 17 and 72, respectively, affirmative and negative responses.34

*** stated that it had not seen any domestically made jewelry armoires. *** stated that only domestic

sources can competitively supply low-priced bedrooms of particle board because of the cost of ocean

freight. *** stated that Italy has superior polyester finishes. *** stated that more heavily carved and

fancy veneer products are available from Asia. *** state speciality, low-production quantity items are

only available domestically. Several purchasers responded that labor-intensive styles were not available

in the United States.

Purchasers were asked to explain any reasons for purchasing from a particular source when a

comparable product may be available from a different source at a lower price. *** responded that the

United States had better availability and terms on minimum order sizes. *** reported that all vendors

supply equivalent goods through reliable supply chains. *** stated that it will purchase a higher-priced

product based on overall quality and reliability of supply. It added that many U.S. suppliers are no more

reliable than foreign suppliers and that they only have shorter shipping times. *** reported that a specific

supplier, whose brand name is important, designs and manufactures the furniture that *** buys. ***

reported that it buys solid wood bedroom furniture produced by *** because of quality, value, and fast

delivery, although less expensive products are available. Several purchasers reported that quality, style,

and availability must be acceptable before they examine price. *** stated that it likes to purchase

domestically because of short lead times and low freight charges but that low-cost alternatives abroad

often give better value. Haverty stated that it purchases imports because domestic manufacturers refused

to provide it with private-label wooden bedroom furniture.35

Purchasers were asked to report the frequency that wooden bedroom furniture from the United

States and from China met minimum quantity specifications. Eighty percent of the responding purchasers

reported that U.S.-produced wooden bedroom furniture always or usually met minimum quality

specifications, and 96.3 percent of the responding purchasers reported that subject imported wooden

bedroom furniture always or usually met similar specifications (table II-6).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-17

Table II-6

Wooden bedroom furniture: Frequency of meeting minimum quality specifications by source, as reported

by purchasers

Source

Number of firms reporting

Always Usually Sometimes Rarely or never

U.S.-produced 12 44 10 4 

Imported from China 18 61 3 0 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Purchasers were asked to compare wooden bedroom furniture from the United States to subject

imports from China with respect to the previously discussed 16 purchase factors (table II-7). The

domestic product was rated superior most often with respect to brand names, delivery time, minimum

quantity requirements, technical support/service, and U.S. transportation costs. Half or more of the

reporting purchasers rated U.S.-produced wooden bedroom furniture superior with respect to brand names

and delivery time; over 80 percent of reporting purchasers rated the United States inferior with respect to

price, and 50 percent or more rated the product from these two sources as comparable with respect to the

other factors. 

Table II-7

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between U.S.-produced and subject Chinese products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

U.S. superior Comparable U.S. inferior

Availability 8 41 8 

Brand names 23 19 4 

Delivery terms 12 38 5 

Delivery time 31 20 6 

Discounts offered 1 43 8 

Extension of credit 11 33 8 

Lowest price 4 7 46 

Minimum quantity requirements 22 28 4 

Packaging 1 43 13 

Product consistency 3 39 15 

Quality meets industry standards 3 43 11 

Quality exceeds industry standards 2 39 16 

Product range 7 29 21 

Reliability of supply 10 43 4 

Technical support/service 21 32 3 

U.S. transportation costs 23 25 2 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-18

Comparisons of Domestic Products and Nonsubject Imports

Purchasers compared wooden bedroom furniture from the United States with product from the

nonsubject countries of Canada (table II-8), Indonesia (table II-9), Italy (table II-10), Malaysia (table II11), and Mexico (table II-12) with respect to the 16 purchase factors.

Table II-8

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between U.S.-produced and nonsubject Canadian products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

U.S. superior Comparable U.S. inferior

Availability 1 7 1 

Brand names 3 3 1 

Delivery terms 0 9 0 

Delivery time 2 7 0 

Discounts offered 0 9 0 

Extension of credit 1 8 0 

Lowest price 1 7 1 

Minimum quantity requirements 1 8 0 

Packaging 0 9 0 

Product consistency 0 9 0 

Quality meets industry standards 0 9 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 0 9 0 

Product range 5 3 1 

Reliability of supply 2 7 0 

Technical support/service 2 7 0 

U.S. transportation costs 4 4 1 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-19

Table II-9

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between U.S.-produced and nonsubject Indonesian products,

as reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

U.S. superior Comparable U.S. inferior

Availability 2 8 4 

Brand names 6 3 0 

Delivery terms 1 12 0 

Delivery time 10 3 1 

Discounts offered 0 12 0 

Extension of credit 4 8 0 

Lowest price 0 0 14 

Minimum quantity requirements 5 8 0 

Packaging 0 10 4 

Product consistency 3 8 3 

Quality meets industry standards 1 10 3 

Quality exceeds industry standards 3 8 3 

Product range 4 4 6 

Reliability of supply 3 11 0 

Technical support/service 4 10 0 

U.S. transportation costs 5 6 1 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-20

Table II-10

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between U.S.-produced and nonsubject Italian products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

U.S. superior Comparable U.S. inferior

Availability 1 7 0

Brand names 3 2 2

Delivery terms 1 7 0

Delivery time 4 4 0

Discounts offered 0 8 0

Extension of credit 3 5 0

Lowest price 2 4 2

Minimum quantity requirements 4 4 0

Packaging 2 5 1

Product consistency 1 6 1

Quality meets industry standards 0 8 0

Quality exceeds industry standards 0 7 1

Product range 3 4 1

Reliability of supply 2 6 0

Technical support/service 3 4 1

U.S. transportation costs 1 4 1

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-21

Table II-11

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between U.S.-produced and nonsubject Malaysian products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

U.S. superior Comparable U.S. inferior

Availability 1 6 2 

Brand names 3 2 0 

Delivery terms 2 6 0 

Delivery time 6 2 1 

Discounts offered 0 7 1 

Extension of credit 3 4 0 

Lowest price 1 1 7 

Minimum quantity requirements 3 3 1 

Packaging 0 6 3 

Product consistency 0 5 4 

Quality meets industry standards 1 5 3 

Quality exceeds industry standards 0 5 4 

Product range 1 2 6 

Reliability of supply 3 4 1 

Technical support/service 3 5 1 

U.S. transportation costs 4 3 1 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-22

Table II-12

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between U.S.-produced and nonsubject Mexican products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

U.S. superior Comparable U.S. inferior

Availability 2 9 0 

Brand names 7 1 0 

Delivery terms 1 10 0 

Delivery time 3 8 0 

Discounts offered 1 8 2 

Extension of credit 1 9 1 

Lowest price 1 1 9 

Minimum quantity requirements 5 4 0 

Packaging 0 11 0 

Product consistency 4 6 1 

Quality meets industry standards 2 9 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 5 6 0 

Product range 7 4 0 

Reliability of supply 5 6 0 

Technical support/service 4 7 0 

U.S. transportation costs 6 5 0 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-23

Comparisons of Subject Imports and Nonsubject Imports

U.S. purchasers compared subject imports from China to nonsubject imports from Canada (table

II-13), Indonesia (table II-14), Italy (table II-15), Malaysia (table II-16), and Mexico (table II-17) with

respect to the 16 purchase factors.

Table II-13

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between subject Chinese and nonsubject Canadian products,

as reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

China superior Comparable China inferior

Availability 2 1 1 

Brand names 0 4 0 

Delivery terms 0 4 0 

Delivery time 0 3 1 

Discounts offered 0 4 0 

Extension of credit 0 4 0 

Lowest price 2 1 1 

Minimum quantity requirements 0 3 1 

Packaging 1 2 1 

Product consistency 0 4 0 

Quality meets industry standards 0 4 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 0 4 0 

Product range 2 1 1 

Reliability of supply 0 4 0 

Technical support/service 0 4 0 

U.S. transportation costs 0 3 0 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-24

Table II-14

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between subject Chinese and nonsubject Indonesian products,

as reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

China superior Comparable China inferior

Availability 2 7 0 

Brand names 0 6 0 

Delivery terms 1 7 0 

Delivery time 2 7 0 

Discounts offered 0 6 0 

Extension of credit 0 6 1 

Lowest price 2 7 0 

Minimum quantity requirements 0 8 0 

Packaging 2 7 0 

Product consistency 1 8 0 

Quality meets industry standards 1 8 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 2 7 0 

Product range 4 5 0 

Reliability of supply 1 8 0 

Technical support/service 1 6 0 

U.S. transportation costs 0 7 0 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-25

Table II-15

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between subject Chinese and nonsubject Italian products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

China superior Comparable China inferior

Availability 2 2 0 

Brand names 0 2 1 

Delivery terms 0 4 0 

Delivery time 0 3 1 

Discounts offered 0 4 0 

Extension of credit 0 4 0 

Lowest price 3 1 0 

Minimum quantity requirements 0 4 0 

Packaging 3 1 0 

Product consistency 3 1 0 

Quality meets industry standards 2 2 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 2 1 1 

Product range 3 1 0 

Reliability of supply 0 4 0 

Technical support/service 1 3 0 

U.S. transportation costs 0 3 0 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-26

Table II-16

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between subject Chinese and nonsubject Malaysian products,

as reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

China superior Comparable China inferior

Availability 3 6 1 

Brand names 1 4 0 

Delivery terms 2 7 0 

Delivery time 5 5 0 

Discounts offered 0 9 0 

Extension of credit 0 9 0 

Lowest price 1 6 3 

Minimum quantity requirements 1 9 0 

Packaging 2 8 0 

Product consistency 4 6 0 

Quality meets industry standards 3 7 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 3 7 0 

Product range 7 2 1 

Reliability of supply 3 7 0 

Technical support/service 1 9 0 

U.S. transportation costs 1 5 1 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

II-27

Table II-17

Wooden bedroom furniture: Comparisons between subject Chinese and nonsubject Mexican products, as

reported by U.S. purchasers

Factor

Number of firms reporting

China superior Comparable China inferior

Availability 5 3 1 

Brand names 1 5 0 

Delivery terms 1 6 2 

Delivery time 0 4 5 

Discounts offered 1 8 0 

Extension of credit 0 8 1 

Lowest price 5 3 1 

Minimum quantity requirements 0 7 2 

Packaging 5 4 0 

Product consistency 7 2 0 

Quality meets industry standards 5 4 0 

Quality exceeds industry standards 5 3 1 

Product range 7 1 1 

Reliability of supply 4 4 1 

Technical support/service 0 8 1 

U.S. transportation costs 1 3 3 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 36 Petitioners’ prehearing brief, p. 35.

 37 Lacquer Craft’s prehearing brief, p. 3. 

 38 Petitioners (prehearing brief, exh. 1, p. 12) suggest a range of -0.7 to -1.2. The Furniture Retailers Group

(postconference brief, exh. 16) cited somewhat dated empirical work showing that the own-price elasticity of

demand ranged from -1.01 to -3.0 and estimated demand elasticity in this case to range from -1.8 to -2.3. Lacquer

Craft stated in its prehearing brief (p. 18, footnote 40) that bedroom furniture is a discretionary purchase and that it

believed that the staff’s original estimate of demand elasticity was slightly low. It also stated that staff’s elasticity of

supply “may be somewhat high,” but that in general the staff’s estimates are reasonable.

 39 Petitioners (prehearing brief, exh. 1, p. 14) stated that they believe that the staff’s estimate is too low and

suggest a range of 6 to 9 based primarily on the fact that a majority of purchasers ranked the domestic product as

comparable on 13 of the 16 purchase factors. Staff notes that there are differences in delivery time and brand names,

and several purchasers stated that hand-carving was more prevalent for the subject imports. A substitution elasticity

of 6 is reasonably high; therefore staff did not adjust the figure.

II-28

ELASTICITY ESTIMATES

The domestic supply elasticity for wooden bedroom furniture is an indication of U.S. producers’

quantity response to changes in the U.S. market price of wooden bedroom furniture. The elasticity of

domestic supply depends on firms’ cost profiles, ability to adjust capacity, ability to access alternate

markets, and other factors. Analysis of these factors earlier indicates that the U.S. industry’s response is

likely to be large. A supply elasticity in the range of 10 to 15 is suggested. 

The U.S. demand elasticity for wooden bedroom furniture measures the sensitivity of the overall

quantity demanded to a change in the U.S. market price of wooden bedroom furniture. This estimate

depends upon consumer preferences, income, marketing factors, and the viability of substitutes. 

Petitioners claimed that bedroom furniture is a necessity, and that the number of bedroom suites

purchased is limited by the number of bedrooms that one has,36 although respondents believe that

spending on wooden bedroom furniture is overwhelmingly discretionary.37 Staff is not aware of any

definite data to resolve the issue, but believes that purchases of bedroom furniture tend to be

discretionary. Bedroom furniture includes nightstands, chests of drawers, and armoires, which do not

appear to be necessities. The existing stock of beds in the country is believed to be large. Demand is

more a function of income than population growth, which argues for the discretionary interpretation. The

petitioners’ exhibit 8 (prehearing brief), in fact, shows that demand has grown roughly in line with

disposable income, which is at a greater rate than population growth. Although it is true that only one

bedroom suite is usually purchased for a bedroom, with increasing wealth one can add bedrooms,

purchase residences with additional bedrooms, or simply replace existing bedrooms suites. It thus

appears that purchases of bedroom furniture are largely discretionary. Based on the available

information, the aggregate demand for wooden bedroom furniture is likely to be in the range of -1.2 to -

1.7.38

The elasticity of substitution measures the percentage change in the ratio of purchases of the

domestic product to the imported product in response to a percentage change in their price ratio. It

depends upon the extent of product differentiation between the domestic and imported products. Product

differentiation, in turn, depends upon the comparability of the domestic and imported product and the

conditions of sale. Based on available information, the elasticity of substitution between U.S.-produced

wooden bedroom furniture and imported wooden bedroom furniture is likely to be in the range of 3 to 6.39
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 Two additional U.S. producers, Country Craft and Khoury, submitted questionnaire responses. However, their

responses were not used (except in table III-1) because they either contained no trade, employment, or financial data,

or were significantly incomplete. One producer, Bernhardt, provided only limited data; however, its response was

received so late that Commission staff did not have adequate time to request Bernhardt to update and further

complete its questionnaire response. One producer, Bebe Furniture, submitted a letter in support of the petition but

did not provide a questionnaire response. Two other U.S. producers, Modern and Thornwood, provided

questionnaire responses in the preliminary phase of the investigation but not in the final phase of the investigation.

 2

 Coverage was calculated using the Commission’s total U.S. shipment value for 2003 of $1.879 billion (see table

III-4) and the petitioners’ U.S. industry estimate for 2003 of $2.141 billion. Staff phone conversations with Joseph

Dorn, counsel to petitioners, October 18, 2004; and Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett,

October 19, 2004.

 3

 Petitioners stated that “. . . survivor bias understates the industry’s downturn.” Testimony of Joseph Dorn,

counsel for petitioners, transcript of hearing at 13.

 4

 The Commission sent producers’ questionnaires to all U.S. producers identified in the petition. See petition at

exh. 1 and 2. On November 3, 2004, the petitioners identified 14 additional U.S. producers that closed plants since

January 1, 2001, and that did not provide a response to the Commission’s producers’ questionnaire. See petitioners’

prehearing brief, exh. 3. The list provided by the petitioners included seven firms not identified in the petition. The

Commission sent questionnaires to the remaining seven firms (not identified in the petition) and received a response 

from Lexington. Two firms, Boyd Furniture and Baker Furniture, received the Commission’s questionnaire but did

not provide a response. Four firms were mailed questionnaires but were returned as undeliverable by FedEx.

 5

 Thirty-eight out of 54 responding U.S. producers support the petition, nine firms oppose the petition, and seven

firms take no position with respect to the petition.

 6

 The value of U.S. shipments is presented in the table to represent the relative size of U.S. producers rather than

the volume of production because many firms had difficulty calculating production quantities on either a pieces or

pounds basis.

 7

 Twenty-six of 54 responding U.S. producers imported the subject merchandise from China in January 2001-

June 2004. See section entitled U.S. Producers’ Imports in Part IV of this report for additional information on U.S.

producers’ imports.

III-1

PART III: U.S. PRODUCERS’ PRODUCTION,

SHIPMENTS, AND EMPLOYMENT

Information on capacity, production, shipments, inventories, and employment is presented in this

section and is based on the questionnaire responses of 49 U.S. producers of wooden bedroom furniture1

representing approximately 88 percent of the value of U.S. shipments of domestically produced wooden

bedroom furniture in 2003.2 3

 A summary of U.S. producer data is presented in appendix C.

U.S. PRODUCERS

Table III-1 presents a list of U.S. producers responding to the Commission’s questionnaires,4

 the

locations of corporate headquarters, the positions taken with respect to the petition,5

 the values and shares

of U.S. shipments by firm in 2003,6

 and whether the firms directly imported the subject merchandise from

China during January 2001-June 2004.7
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-2

Table III-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers, locations of corporate headquarters, positions taken with respect to the petition, shares of reported

domestically produced U.S. shipments in 2003, and whether firms directly imported the subject merchandise from China in January 2001-June 2004

Firms Location

Position taken with respect to the petition U.S.-produced U.S.

shipments in 2003

 Imported

from China

Support1 Oppose 

Takes no

position

Public

Yes No

Value Share

$1,000 Percent Yes No

Adden MA *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

American Drew2 NC Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

American of Martinsville2 VA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Ashley WI U U *** *** *** ***

Bassett VA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Bebe CA U U (

4

) (4) (4) (4)

Bernhardt NC *** *** *** U (

4

) (4) *** ***

Carolina Furniture Works SC Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Century NC Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Chromcraft Revington IN *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Country Craft3 VA U U (

4

) (4) *** ***

Craftique NC U U *** *** *** ***

Crawford NY Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Cresent5 TN U U *** *** *** ***

E.J. Victor NC U U *** *** *** ***

Ethan Allen CT *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Furniture Brands6 MO U U *** *** *** ***

Harden Manufacturing (AL) AL *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Harden Furniture (NY) NY Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Hart TN Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Higdon FL Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Hooker5 VA *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Johnston-Tombigbee MO Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Khoury3 MI *** *** *** U (

4

) (4) *** ***

Kincaid2 NC Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

L. & J.G. Stickley NY Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Lea2 NC Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Lexington NC *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Michels & Company CA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

MJ Wood Products VT Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Mobel IN Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Modern7 WA U U (

4

) (4) *** ***

Moosehead ME Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

O’Sullivan MO U U *** *** *** ***

Oakwood Interiors CA U U *** *** *** ***

Pennsylvania House2 NC Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Perdues SD U U *** *** *** ***

Progressive8 OH *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Samuel Lawrence9 AZ *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Sandberg CA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Sauder OH *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Standard AL U U *** *** *** ***

Stanley VA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Statton MD U U *** *** *** ***

T. Copeland & Sons VT Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Thornwood7 AZ *** *** *** U (

4

) (4) *** ***

Through The Barn Door NC *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Tom Seely WV U U *** *** *** ***

Trendwood AZ *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

Vaughan VA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Vaughan-Bassett VA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Vermont Tubbs VT Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Webb10 VA Petitioner U *** *** *** ***

Whittier Wood Products OR *** *** *** U *** *** *** ***

 Total (54) 38 9 7 39 15 1,878,740 100.0 26 26 1

 Five labor unions are co-petitioners and support the petition: UBC Southern Council of Industrial Workers, Local Union 2305, Columbus, MS; United

Steelworkers of America, Local 193U, Lewisburg, PA; Carpenters Industrial Union, Local 2093, Phoenix, AZ; and Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and

Helpers, Local 991, Bay Minette, AL; and the IUE, Industrial Division of CWA, Local 82472, Hagerstown, MD. 2

 Firm is a wholly owned subsidiary of La-Z-Boy Inc., Monroe, MI.

3

 Firm provided limited, substantially incomplete, or unusable data; therefore its response is not included in the report, except as noted. 4

 Data not reported.

5

 Firm was a petitioner during the preliminary phase investigation; however, firm is not a petitioner in the final phase investigation. 6

 Furniture Brands owns five U.S. producers: Broyhill, Lenoir, NC; Drexel Heritage, High Point, NC; Henredon, Morganton, NC; Maitland-Smith, High Point,

NC; and Thomasville, Thomasville, NC. 7

 Firm provided a questionnaire response in the preliminary phase investigation but not in the final phase investigation. 8

 Progressive is a wholly owned subsidiary of Sauder Woodworking Company (Sauder), Archbold, OH.

9

 Samuel Lawrence is owned by Woodstuff Manufacturing which is owned ***. Samuel Lawrence closed its production facilities in March 2004. 10 Firm is a 50/50 joint venture owned by Vaughan Furniture and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture, Galax, VA.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 8 Table D-2 in app. D presents data of U.S. production of wooden bedroom furniture based on firms’ positions

with respect to the petition. Table D-3 in app. D presents data of U.S. production of wooden bedroom furniture

based on whether firms imported the subject merchandise between January 2001-June 2004.

III-3

U.S. CAPACITY, PRODUCTION, AND CAPACITY UTILIZATION

U.S. producers’ capacity, production, and capacity utilization data are presented in table III-2 and

figure III-1. The Commission’s producers’ questionnaire requested that firms provide production and

capacity data in pieces and pounds; however, many firms could not provide quantity data. U.S.

production of wooden bedroom furniture by firm is presented in table III-3.

Table III-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ capacity, production, and capacity utilization, 2001-03,

January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Capacity (quantity)

Pieces 17,833,664 17,884,974 17,316,172 8,774,426 8,620,708

Pounds 1,520,349,978 1,536,833,104 1,486,982,328 756,050,200 751,193,835

Production (quantity)

Pieces 13,987,146 13,872,218 12,712,592 6,727,891 6,555,543

Pounds 1,151,087,815 1,166,303,093 1,073,777,550 560,845,453 556,256,575

Capacity utilization (percent)1

Pieces 77.2 76.8 72.7 76.1 74.6

Pounds 74.4 75.1 71.3 73.6 72.9

1

 Capacity utilization calculated from firms providing both production and capacity data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 

Table III-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ production, by firm, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 2004

*******

The 35 firms supporting the petition and providing data (3 firms did not provide data) accounted

for 43.4 percent of reported U.S. production (based on pieces) in 2001, 42.9 percent in 2002, 37.8 percent

in 2003, 37.2 percent in interim 2003, and 35.9 percent in interim 2004 (figure III-2). The nine reporting

firms opposing the petition accounted for 52.3 percent of reported U.S. production in 2001, 53.2 percent

in 2002, 59.1 percent in 2003, 59.7 percent in interim 2003, and 60.9 percent in interim 2004. The five

reporting firms taking no position with respect to the petition accounted for 4.3 percent of reported U.S.

production in 2001, 3.8 percent in 2002, 3.1 percent in 2003, 3.1 percent in interim 2003, and 3.1 percent

in interim 2004.8
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-4

Figure III-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ capacity, production, and capacity utilization, based on

pieces, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

74.6%

76.1%

72.7%

77.2% 76.8%

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

18,000,000

20,000,000

2001 2002 2003 Jan.-June 2003 Jan.-June 2004

Quantity (pieces) 

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Capacity utilization (percent)

Capacity Production Capacity Utilization

Source: Table III-2.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-5

Figure III-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Share of U.S. production accounted for by U.S. producers according to their 

position taken with respect to the petition

35.9%

37.2%

37.8%

42.9%

43.4%

60.9%

59.7%

59.1%

53.2%

52.3%

3.1%

3.1%

3.1%

3.8%

4.3%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0%

Jan.-June 2004

Jan.-June 2003

2003

2002

2001

Share of reported U.S. production (percent)

 Firms in support of petition Firms in opposition to petition Firms taking no position on petition

Source: Table D-2.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-6

Many U.S. producers that provided usable data indicated that they had difficulty in determining

capacity because of the nature of the production process, which includes three distinct production

processes (sawing, assembling, and finishing), each of which has its own capacities and constraints. In

many instances, firms providing capacity data based their responses on “best estimates.” With respect to

production, many producers indicated that they had difficulty providing precise production data because

their firms’ data reporting systems do not collect the data as requested. Moreover, a number of firms

which did not provide questionnaire responses closed plants since January 1, 2001, so decreases in 

capacity and certain other data may be understated.

U.S. PRODUCERS’ SHIPMENTS

Data on U.S. producers’ shipments, by types, are presented in table III-4 and figure III-3. Table

III-5 presents U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments, by firm. Table III-6 presents U.S. producers’ U.S.

shipments of wooden bedroom furniture by selected pieces. Approximately 21.3 percent of reporting

U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments in 2003 (based on pieces) were beds, 31.1 percent were dressers/chest of

drawers, 20.2 percent were nightstands/night tables, 3.4 percent were armoires, and 24.1 percent were all

other pieces.

Table III-7 and figure III-4 present U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments by channels of distribution. 

Approximately 15.4 percent of reporting U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments in 2003 (based on value) went to

related retailers, 76.4 percent went to unrelated retailers, 4.2 percent went to hospitality/institutional

firms, 3.3 percent went to distributors, and 0.8 percent went to other market segments. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-7

Table III-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments, by type of shipments, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Commercial shipments 13,991,430 13,641,891 12,513,684 6,525,586 6,236,116

Internal consumption 15,701 31,671 57,502 15,463 74,365

Transfers to related firms 14,947 26,235 69,907 24,329 80,136

U.S. shipments 14,022,078 13,699,797 12,641,093 6,565,378 6,390,617

Export shipments 206,088 225,349 249,187 109,568 123,000

Total shipments 14,228,166 13,925,146 12,890,280 6,674,946 6,513,617

Quantity (pounds)

Commercial shipments 1,147,492,263 1,130,544,800 1,050,801,039 538,035,325 522,056,891

Internal consumption 1,197,707 2,475,729 4,560,932 1,221,508 6,059,534

Transfers to related firms 3,347,991 4,374,316 8,233,315 3,403,599 6,652,795

U.S. shipments 1,152,037,961 1,137,394,845 1,063,595,286 542,660,432 534,769,220

Export shipments 20,127,957 21,438,386 23,493,804 10,784,957 11,728,037

Total shipments 1,172,165,918 1,158,833,231 1,087,089,090 553,445,389 546,497,257

Value ($1,000)

Commercial shipments 2,282,858 2,134,943 1,855,125 951,536 881,273

Internal consumption 2,497 3,410 5,573 1,352 8,186

Transfers to related firms 8,949 11,794 18,042 7,945 9,764

U.S. shipments 2,294,304 2,150,147 1,878,740 960,833 899,223

Export shipments 34,856 35,279 34,928 17,423 16,548

Total shipments1 2,329,160 2,185,426 1,913,668 978,256 915,771

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-8

Table III-4--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments, by type of shipments, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Unit value (per piece)

Commercial shipments $163.16 $156.50 $148.25 $145.82 $141.32

Internal consumption 159.03 107.67 96.92 87.43 110.08

Transfers to related firms 598.72 449.55 258.09 326.57 121.84

U.S. shipments 163.62 156.95 148.62 146.35 140.71

Export shipments 169.13 156.55 140.17 159.02 134.54

Average 163.70 156.94 148.46 146.56 140.59

Unit value (per pound)

Commercial shipments $1.74 $1.67 $1.56 $1.57 $1.50

Internal consumption 2.08 1.38 1.22 1.11 1.35

Transfers to related firms 2.67 2.70 2.19 2.33 1.47

U.S. shipments 1.74 1.67 1.57 1.57 1.49

Export shipments 1.73 1.65 1.49 1.62 1.41

Average 1.74 1.67 1.57 1.57 1.49

Share of total shipments (percent of value)

Commercial shipments 98.0 97.7 96.9 97.3 96.2

Internal consumption 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.9

Transfers to related firms 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.8 1.1

U.S. shipments 98.5 98.4 98.2 98.2 98.2

Export shipments 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

1

 The value for total shipments differs from the value of net sales presented in the financial section of this report because of

differences in the number of responding firms and because some firms reported their financials on a fiscal-year rather than a

calendar-year basis.

Note: Totals for U.S. shipments of pieces differ from those in tables III-6 and III-7 because of differences in the number of

responding firms and/or because of other reporting anomalies.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-9

Figure III-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments, by type of shipments, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Value ($1,000) 

 U.S. shipments Export shipments

Source: Table III-4.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-10

Table III-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments, by firm, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 2004

*******

Table III-6

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ U.S. shipments, by selected pieces, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Beds1 2,922,320 2,788,318 2,600,129 1,393,402 1,295,094

Dressers/chest of drawers 4,262,311 4,199,809 3,789,350 1,980,480 1,848,370

Night stands/night tables 2,732,194 2,716,891 2,461,466 1,300,435 1,123,477

Armoires2 470,512 443,737 413,233 206,988 174,622

All other pieces 2,951,395 3,097,224 2,936,771 1,509,664 1,539,151

Total, U.S. shipments 13,338,732 13,245,979 12,200,949 6,390,969 5,980,714

Share (percent)

Beds1 21.9 21.1 21.3 21.8 21.7

Dressers/chest of drawers 32.0 31.7 31.1 31.0 30.9

Night stands/night tables 20.5 20.5 20.2 20.3 18.8

Armoires2 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.9

All other pieces 22.1 23.4 24.1 23.6 25.7

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

1

 A bed is defined as a headboard, with or without any combination of related pieces such as a footboard, side rails, and

canopy, with a bed considered a single piece whether it contains one or more separate pieces. Bunk beds are considered two

beds and therefore are two pieces. 2

 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more drawers

(either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold television receivers and/or other audio-visual entertainment

systems.

Note: Totals for U.S. shipments of pieces differ from those in tables III-4 and III-7 because of differences in the number of

responding firms and/or because of other reporting anomalies.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-11

Table III-7

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments by channels of distribution, 2001-03, JanuaryJune 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 1,812,123 1,799,866 1,660,958 914,420 910,627

Unrelated retailers 10,993,311 10,710,943 9,796,333 5,051,740 4,868,453

Hospitality/institutional 722,047 558,118 485,995 260,158 267,628

Distributors 808,561 836,439 886,182 470,335 463,335

Other market segments 105,904 117,901 95,883 49,161 44,946

Total, U.S. shipments 14,441,946 14,023,267 12,925,351 6,745,814 6,554,989

Quantity (pounds)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 93,438,487 95,018,568 94,452,403 50,964,856 45,002,710

Unrelated retailers 931,201,169 929,570,973 882,496,088 436,704,170 425,192,276

Hospitality/institutional 61,493,145 44,485,507 37,524,196 22,196,222 23,023,590

Distributors 57,450,450 61,878,651 56,305,379 29,145,620 30,475,255

Other market segments 11,200,065 12,329,322 9,434,765 4,765,101 4,642,228

Total, U.S. shipments 1,154,783,316 1,143,283,021 1,080,212,831 543,775,969 528,336,059

Value ($1,000)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 323,047 320,144 301,936 156,866 152,211

Unrelated retailers 1,874,113 1,737,056 1,502,374 771,316 707,361

Hospitality/institutional 129,371 93,955 82,039 38,358 37,569

Distributors 63,259 66,069 64,403 33,992 33,365

Other market segments 16,953 18,143 14,853 6,944 8,017

Total, U.S. shipments 2,406,743 2,235,367 1,965,605 1,007,476 938,523

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-12

Table III-7--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments by channels of distribution, 2001-03, JanuaryJune 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Share of U.S. shipments (percent/pieces)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 12.5 12.8 12.9 13.6 13.9

Unrelated retailers 76.1 76.4 75.8 74.9 74.3

Hospitality/institutional 5.0 4.0 3.8 3.9 4.1

Distributors 5.6 6.0 6.9 7.0 7.1

Other market segments 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Share of U.S. shipments (percent/pounds)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 8.1 8.3 8.7 9.4 8.5

Unrelated retailers 80.6 81.3 81.7 80.3 80.5

Hospitality/institutional 5.3 3.9 3.5 4.1 4.4

Distributors 5.0 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.8

Other market segments 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Share of U.S. shipments (percent of value)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 13.4 14.3 15.4 15.6 16.2

Unrelated retailers 77.9 77.7 76.4 76.6 75.4

Hospitality/institutional 5.4 4.2 4.2 3.8 4.0

Distributors 2.6 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.6

Other market segments 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.9

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Note: Totals for U.S. shipments of pieces differ from those in tables III-4 and III-6 because of differences in the number of

responding firms and/or because of other reporting anomalies. Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-13

Figure III-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ shipments by channels of distribution, 2003

Source: Table III-7.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 9 ***.

III-14

U.S. PRODUCERS’ PURCHASES

Information on U.S. producers’ purchases of domestically produced and imported wooden

bedroom furniture (other than their direct imports) are presented in table III-8 and table III-9. Eight U.S.

producers, ***, purchased subject merchandise from China during January 2001-June 2004. Table III-10

presents information on the ratio of U.S. producers’ purchases of the subject imports to the value of their

U.S. shipments.

Twenty-six U.S. producers also directly imported subject merchandise from China during January

2000-June 2004. Information on U.S. producers’ imports is presented in the section entitled U.S.

Producers’ Imports in Part IV of this report. ***.9
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-15

Table III-8

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ purchases, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value ($1,000)

Purchases of imports from:

China1 1,705 10,410 9,823 6,322 3,641

Brazil *** *** *** *** ***

Indonesia *** *** *** *** ***

Malaysia *** *** *** *** ***

Mexico *** *** *** *** ***

Vietnam *** *** *** *** ***

All other sources 3,521 3,145 4,984 3,024 3,520

Subtotal, imported 7,171 16,318 17,770 10,461 8,848

Purchases from domestic producers 16,134 18,109 17,781 9,424 8,928

Purchases from other domestic sources 0 0 0 0 0

Subtotal, domestic purchases 16,134 18,109 17,781 9,424 8,928

Total 23,305 34,427 35,551 19,885 17,776

Share of total purchases (percent)

Purchases of imports from:

China1 7.3 30.2 27.6 31.8 20.5

Brazil *** *** *** *** ***

Indonesia *** *** *** *** ***

Malaysia *** *** *** *** ***

Mexico *** *** *** *** ***

Vietnam *** *** *** *** ***

All other sources 15.1 9.1 14.0 15.2 19.8

Subtotal, imported 30.8 47.4 50.0 52.6 49.8

Purchases from domestic producers 69.2 52.6 50.0 47.4 50.2

Purchases from other domestic sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Subtotal, domestic purchases 69.2 52.6 50.0 47.4 50.2

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

1

 May include purchases of imports of wooden bedroom furniture produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm

Markor Tianjin. 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-16

Table III-9

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ purchases, by firms and by sources, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

*******
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-17

Table III-10

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ purchases of subject imports, U.S. shipments, and ratio of

purchases of subject imports to the firms’ U.S. shipments, by firm, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Purchases of subject imports ($1,000)

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

Total2 1,705 10,410 9,823 6,322 3,641

Value of U.S. shipments ($1,000)

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

Total2 755,059 705,799 609,833 320,295 286,539

Ratio of purchases of subject imports to value of U.S. shipments (percent)

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

***1 *** *** *** *** ***

Average 0.2 1.5 1.6 2.0 1.3

1

 ***.

2

 Data may include purchases of imports of wooden bedroom furniture produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm

Markor Tianjin.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 10 See petitioners’ prehearing brief, exh. 32.

III-18

U.S. PRODUCERS’ INVENTORIES

Data on U.S. producers’ inventories of domestically produced wooden bedroom furniture are 

presented in table III-11. As with other quantity data presented in the report, several firms did not report

inventory data in pieces or pounds.

Table III-11

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ end-of-period inventories, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

End-of-period inventories (quantity)

Pieces 1,825,553 1,867,947 1,810,686 1,926,629 1,976,361

Pounds 154,421,031 163,042,720 154,889,078 170,561,612 174,923,964

Ratio of inventories to production (percent)

Pieces 13.1 13.5 14.2 14.3 15.1

Pounds 13.4 14.0 14.4 15.2 15.7

Ratio of inventories to U.S. shipments (percent)

Pieces 13.0 13.6 14.3 14.7 15.5

Pounds 13.4 14.3 14.6 15.7 16.4

Ratio of inventories to total shipments (percent)

Pieces 12.8 13.4 14.0 14.4 15.2

Pounds 13.2 14.1 14.2 15.4 16.0

Note: Ratios are calculated using data from firms that provided both numerator and denominator information. Partial-year ratios

are calculated using annualized production and shipment data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 

U.S. EMPLOYMENT, WAGES, AND PRODUCTIVITY

U.S. producers’ employment data are presented in table III-12. The petitioners identified 65 plant

closings at 39 firms since January 2001, reportedly resulting in layoffs of 18,710 workers.10
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 11 Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2272(a)).

 12 See petitioners’ prehearing brief, exh. 31. Not all of the TAA applications specify China as the source of

import competition, and some of the closed plants produced products other than wooden bedroom furniture (e.g.,

other case goods, upholstered items, dining room furniture, and occasional furniture).

 13 See question II-5 of the Commission’s U.S. producers’ questionnaire.

 14 Firms responding “Yes” were: ***. 

III-19

Table III-12

Wooden bedroom furniture: Average number of production and related workers, hours worked, wages

paid to such employees, hourly wages, productivity, and unit labor costs, 2001-03, January-June 2003,

and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Production and related workers (number) 32,680 30,107 26,181 27,516 24,352

Hours worked (1,000) 61,640 57,838 49,053 27,298 24,823

Wages paid ($1,000) 740,273 713,611 624,685 325,169 312,808

Hourly wages $12.01 $12.34 $12.73 $11.91 $12.60

Productivity1 (pieces per 1,000 hours) 223.4 237.5 256.6 244.8 259.3

Productivity1 (pounds per 1,000 hours) 21,038.5 22,419.0 24,231.0 22,949.7 24,517.6

Unit labor costs2 (per piece) $53.76 $51.94 $49.63 $48.66 $48.60

Unit labor costs2 (per pound) $0.58 $0.56 $0.53 $0.53 $0.52

1 Productivity is calculated using data of only those firms providing both numerator and denominator information. 2

 Unit labor costs are calculated using data of only those firms providing both numerator and denominator information.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 

The petitioners also stated that the U.S. Department of Labor has certified 12,793 furniture

workers at 53 plants as eligible for trade adjustment assistance (TAA)11 from January 2001 to June

2004.12 U.S. producers were asked if their firms or workers had applied for TAA certification directly

related to imports of bedroom furniture from China.13 Most firms answered “No;” seventeen firms

responded “Yes.”14

U.S. producers were asked whether unions represent workers at their U.S. production facilities. 

Eight U.S. producers reported “Yes,” and 37 U.S. producers reported “No.” Table III-13 presents a list of

U.S. producers reporting union representation of their production and related workers.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

III-20

Table III-13

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers reporting union representation of their production and related

workers, January 2001-June 2004

Firm Union

Crawford1 IUE/FW Furniture Workers Division, AFL-CIO, Local 45

Ethan Allen United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 8212

United Steelworkers of America, Local 140403

Johnston-Tombigbee1 United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 2305

Michels & Company1 Cabinet Makers, Millmen, and Industrial Carpenters, Local 7214

Pennsylvania House1 United Steelworkers of America, Local 193U

Sandberg1 Cabinet Makers, Millmen, and Industrial Carpenters, Local 721

Standard Teamsters Local Union No. 9915

Statton IUE, Industrial Division of CWA, AFL-CIO, Local 82472

1

 Petitioner.

2

 Passaic, NJ, plant.

3

 Eldred, PA, plant.

4

 Lynwood, CA, plant only.

5

 Bay Minette, AL, plant only.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 Thirty firms responded that they did not import the subject merchandise from China during the period January

2001-June 2004. 

 2

 Coverage was calculated using the value of U.S. imports from China reported by responding U.S. importers in

2003 ($1.124 billion) compared to the value of imports of $1.402 billion in 2003 from official import statistics.

 3

 Based on Customs data.

 4

 Official import statistics presented for wooden bedroom furniture are comprised of two HTS statistical reporting

numbers: 9403.50.9040 (wooden beds of a kind used in the bedroom) and 9403.50.9080 (wooden furniture of a kind

used in the bedroom not elsewhere classified). The scope mentions four HTS subheadings and statistical reporting

numbers; however, most of the subject imports enter under 9403.50.9040 and 9403.50.9080. The third number, HTS

subheading 9403.90.70, contains, among other items, certain metal furniture parts and certain unfinished furniture

parts made of wood products. The fourth number, HTS subheading 7009.92.50, is a residual or “basket” category

that contains, among other items, framed glass mirrors of a kind used in the bedroom. To the extent that subject

imports enter under the latter subheadings, import data may be slightly understated.

 5

 Information on imports of wooden bedroom furniture from questionnaire responses is presented in app. E (tables

E-1 through E-3).

 6

 Official import statistics count each piece of a wooden bed (e.g., headboard, footboard, sideboards) as separate

pieces. However, the Commission’s questionnaires defined a wooden bed as any combination of headboard,

footboard, or sideboards.

IV-1

PART IV: U.S. IMPORTS, APPARENT

CONSUMPTION, AND MARKET SHARES

U.S. IMPORTERS

The Commission sent questionnaires to 185 U.S. importers of wooden bedroom furniture and

received usable responses from 123 firms1

 that account for approximately 80 percent of U.S. imports from

China (based on value) in January 2001-June 2004.2

 The Commission received questionnaire responses

from each of the top 10 known importers from January 2003-June 2004.3

 Information on responding U.S.

importers, their import sources, and their imports during the period for which data were collected is

presented in appendix E (table E-1). Presented in appendix F is information on responding U.S.

purchasers (tables F-1 and F-2).

U.S. IMPORTS

Data for imports of wooden bedroom furniture are based on official statistics of Commerce,

unless otherwise noted.4

 Table IV-1 and figure IV-1 present data on U.S. imports of wooden bedroom

furniture.5

 Table IV-2 presents data on U.S. imports of wooden beds. Official import statistics provide

quantity data for wooden beds6

 but not for other wooden bedroom furniture. Therefore, official import

data (except for beds) are presented in terms of value only.

U.S. IMPORTERS’ SHIPMENTS

Table IV-3 presents U.S. importers’ U.S. shipments of wooden bedroom furniture by selected

pieces, based on questionnaire responses. Approximately 31.9 percent of reporting U.S. importers’ U.S. 

shipments of subject imports from China in 2003 (based on pieces) were beds, 23.4 percent were 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-2

Table IV-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. imports, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June

20041

Source

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value ($1,000)2

China3 (subject) *** *** *** *** ***

Nonsubject:

China (Markor Tianjin) *** *** *** *** ***

Brazil 73,216 98,903 110,647 48,479 63,671

Indonesia 130,165 151,394 149,487 72,406 87,398

Malaysia 44,897 67,979 114,588 50,301 74,802

Mexico 145,171 127,553 98,227 49,222 44,499

Vietnam 860 10,871 45,454 15,924 48,300

All other sources 869,420 896,807 867,626 426,596 427,926

Subtotal, nonsubject *** *** *** *** ***

Total 1,829,281 2,311,456 2,787,927 1,287,529 1,618,423

Share of value (percent)

China (subject) *** *** *** *** ***

Nonsubject:

China (Markor Tianjin) *** *** *** *** ***

Brazil 4.0 4.3 4.0 3.8 3.9

Indonesia 7.1 6.6 5.4 5.6 5.4

Malaysia 2.5 2.9 4.1 3.9 4.6

Mexico 7.9 5.5 3.5 3.8 2.8

Vietnam 0.0 0.5 1.6 1.2 3.0

All other sources 47.5 38.8 31.1 33.1 26.4

Subtotal, nonsubject *** *** *** *** ***

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

1

 Official import statistics presented for wooden bedroom furniture are comprised of two HTS statistical reporting numbers: 

9403.50.9040 (wooden beds of a kind used in the bedroom) and 9403.50.9080 (wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom

not elsewhere classified). The scope mentions four HTSUS subheadings and statistical reporting numbers; however, most of the

subject imports enter under 9403.50.9040 and 9403.50.9080. The third number, HTS subheading 9403.90.70, contains, among

other items, certain metal furniture parts and certain unfinished furniture parts made of wood products. The fourth number, HTS

subheading 7009.92.50, is a residual or “basket” category that contains, among other items, framed glass mirrors of a kind used

in the bedroom. To the extent that subject imports enter under the latter subheadings, import data may be slightly understated. 2

 Landed, duty-paid.

3

 U.S. producers accounted for 33.9 percent of reported subject imports from China in 2001, 35.1 percent in 2002, 35.4

percent in 2003, 33.3 percent in January-June 2003, and 36.0 percent in January-June 2004 (table D-3). 

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.

Source: Compiled from official statistics of Commerce.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-3

Figure IV-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. imports, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June

2004

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Value ($1,000) 

 Imports from China* Imports from all other sources

* Includes imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

Source: Table IV-1.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-4

Table IV-2

Wooden beds: U.S. imports, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Source

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

China2 1,389,065 2,344,180 3,136,525 1,423,811 1,909,859

Nonsubject:

Brazil 257,296 411,223 573,491 249,586 258,444

Indonesia 524,683 625,757 515,035 280,235 204,092

Malaysia 147,097 227,581 449,664 168,337 330,050

Mexico 322,391 289,554 214,000 104,186 99,142

Vietnam 93 30,117 146,016 47,191 154,846

All other sources 1,597,358 1,797,892 1,918,162 914,061 924,105

Subtotal, nonsubject 2,848,918 3,382,124 3,816,368 1,763,596 1,970,679

Total 4,237,983 5,726,304 6,952,893 3,187,407 3,880,538

Value ($1,000)3

China2 197,368 340,977 477,289 214,135 283,294

Nonsubject:

Brazil 26,535 34,742 46,258 19,943 20,859

Indonesia 57,092 67,318 61,646 33,400 28,391

Malaysia 15,944 22,370 42,972 16,561 30,307

Mexico 27,766 24,904 16,059 8,171 7,804

Vietnam 83 3,371 16,901 5,761 19,129

All other sources 206,904 225,619 234,073 112,531 111,335

Subtotal, nonsubject 334,324 378,325 417,910 196,368 217,824

Total 531,692 719,302 895,199 410,503 501,118

Unit value (per piece)

China2 $142.09 $145.46 $152.17 $150.40 $148.33

Nonsubject:

Brazil 103.13 84.49 80.66 79.91 80.71

Indonesia 108.81 107.58 119.69 119.19 139.11

Malaysia 108.39 98.30 95.56 98.38 91.82

Mexico 86.13 86.01 75.04 78.43 78.71

Vietnam 896.19 111.93 115.75 122.08 123.53

All other sources 129.53 125.49 122.03 123.11 120.48

Subtotal, nonsubject 117.35 111.86 109.50 111.35 110.53

Total 125.46 125.61 128.75 128.79 129.14

1

 Official import statistics for beds, as classified under HTS statistical reporting number 9403.50.9040 (wooden beds of a kind

used in the bedroom). Official import statistics count each piece of a wooden bed (e.g., headboard, footboard, sideboards) as

separate pieces. However, the Commission's questionnaires defined a wooden bed as any combination of headboard,

footboard, or sideboards. 2

 Includes imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin. 3

 Landed, duty-paid.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.

Source: Compiled from official statistics of Commerce.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 7 Based on data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

IV-5

Table IV-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ U.S. shipments, by selected pieces, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Shipment of imports from China:

Beds1 1,082,293 1,742,537 1,998,204 857,602 1,143,332

Dressers/chest of drawers 665,707 1,140,072 1,464,311 644,416 909,725

Night stands/night tables 636,459 1,129,130 1,450,833 677,647 893,637

Armoires2 184,771 348,479 432,775 199,190 258,271

All other pieces 545,043 722,832 914,505 424,846 479,930

Total 3,114,273 5,083,050 6,260,628 2,803,701 3,684,895

Share (percent)

Shipment of imports from China:

Beds1 34.8 34.3 31.9 30.6 31.0

Dressers/chest of drawers 21.4 22.4 23.4 23.0 24.7

Night stands/night tables 20.4 22.2 23.2 24.2 24.3

Armoires2 5.9 6.9 6.9 7.1 7.0

All other pieces 17.5 14.2 14.6 15.2 13.0

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

1

 A bed is defined as a headboard, with or without any combination of related pieces such as a footboard, side rails, and

canopy, with a bed considered a single piece whether it contains one or more separate pieces. Bunk beds are considered two

beds and therefore are two pieces. 2

 An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, and with one or more drawers

(either exterior below or above the doors or interior behind the doors), shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used to hold television receivers and/or other audio-visual entertainment

systems.

Note: Totals for import shipments of pieces from China do not reconcile with those in table IV-4 because of differences in the

number of responding firms and/or because of other reporting anomalies.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 

dressers/chest of drawers, 23.2 percent were nightstands/night tables, 6.9 percent were armoires, and 14.6

percent were all other pieces.7

Table IV-4 and figure IV-2 present U.S. importers’ U.S. shipments by channels of distribution,

based on questionnaire responses. Approximately 12.0 percent of reporting U.S. importers’ U.S.

shipments of subject imports from China in 2003 (based on value) went to related retailers, 75.9 percent

went to unrelated retailers, *** percent went to hospitality/institutional firms, *** percent went to

distributors, and 10.1 percent went to other market segments.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-6

Table IV-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ U.S. shipments of imports from China, by channels of

distribution, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 343,543 540,766 627,008 348,198 357,539

Unrelated retailers 1,913,760 3,249,364 3,983,651 1,849,239 2,425,707

Hospitality/institutional *** *** *** *** ***

Distributors *** *** *** *** ***

Other market segments 278,945 384,786 575,188 265,764 287,615

Total, U.S. shipments 2,699,734 4,382,947 5,473,946 2,603,523 3,165,644

Quantity (pounds)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 23,186,695 15,737,142 21,095,069 10,219,220 12,491,436

Unrelated retailers 159,562,572 289,581,751 374,919,957 173,629,832 227,928,158

Hospitality/institutional *** *** *** *** ***

Distributors *** *** *** *** ***

Other market segments 106,728 185,272 265,628 132,101 123,848

Total, U.S. shipments 189,816,766 318,183,850 413,174,732 192,334,013 248,175,978

Value ($1,000)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 48,318 79,542 118,706 54,156 71,540

Unrelated retailers 320,670 609,536 752,988 355,635 446,240

Hospitality/institutional *** *** *** *** ***

Distributors *** *** *** *** ***

Other market segments 44,656 62,881 100,704 45,248 49,496

Total, U.S. shipments 420,987 767,472 992,475 464,437 576,956

Table continued. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-7

Table IV-4--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ shipments of imports from China, by channels of distribution,

2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Share of U.S. shipments (percent/pieces)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 12.7 12.3 11.5 13.4 11.3

Unrelated retailers 70.9 74.1 72.8 71.0 76.6

Hospitality/institutional *** *** *** *** ***

Distributors *** *** *** *** ***

Other market segments 10.3 8.8 10.5 10.2 9.1

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Share of U.S. shipments (percent/pounds)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 12.2 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.0

Unrelated retailers 84.1 91.0 90.7 90.3 91.8

Hospitality/institutional *** *** *** *** ***

Distributors *** *** *** *** ***

Other market segments 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Share of U.S. shipments (percent of value)

U.S. shipments to:

Related retailers 11.5 10.4 12.0 11.7 12.4

Unrelated retailers 76.2 79.4 75.9 76.6 77.3

Hospitality/institutional *** *** *** *** ***

Distributors *** *** *** *** ***

Other market segments 10.6 8.2 10.1 9.7 8.6

Total, U.S. shipments 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Note: Totals for import shipments of pieces from China do not reconcile with those in table IV-3 because of differences in the

number of responding firms and/or because of other reporting anomalies. Because of rounding, figures may not add to totals

shown.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-8

Figure IV-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ shipments by channels of distribution, 2003

Source: Table IV-4.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 8 Information on U.S. producers’ purchases of imports (i.e., nondirect imports where U.S. producers are not the

importer of record) are presented in Part III of this report in the section entitled U.S. Producers’ Purchases.

 9

 Petitioning firms accounted for 13 of the 26 U.S. producers importing the subject merchandise.

 10 See table D-4 in app. D.

IV-9

U.S. PRODUCERS’ IMPORTS

Table IV-5 and figure IV-3 present the value of reporting U.S. producers’ direct imports of

wooden bedroom furniture from China during January 2001-June 2004, and other applicable data.8

Twenty-six U.S. producers reported directly importing wooden bedroom furniture from China.9

 U.S.

producers’ imports from China (based on value) accounted for 33.9 percent of reported U.S. imports of

the subject merchandise in 2001, 35.1 percent in 2002, 35.4 percent in 2003, 33.3 percent in January-June

2003, and 36.0 percent in January-June 2004.10

Figure IV-4 presents reporting U.S. producers’ subject imports as a ratio to those producers’

domestically produced U.S. shipments. Direct subject imports by U.S. producers (based on value) as a

ratio to their domestically produced U.S. shipments increased throughout January 2001-June 2004,

increasing from 7.8 percent in 2001 to 16.7 percent in 2002 to 25.6 percent in 2003, and increasing from

23.5 percent in January-June 2003 to 32.7 percent in January-June 2004.

Table IV-6 presents responding U.S. producers’ direct imports of wooden bedroom furniture from

China (in number of pieces) during the period for which data were collected in the investigation, and U.S.

producers’ direct imports from China as a ratio to their U.S. production (based on responses to

Commission questionnaires).

Table IV-7 presents data on the ratio of imports to total U.S. production, by sources. Imports

from China as a share of production increased throughout January 2001-June 2004, increasing from 25.7

percent in 2001 to 47.5 percent in 2003 to 62.7 percent in 2003, and increasing from 60.4 percent in

January-June 2003 to 74.7 percent in January-June 2004.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-10

Table IV-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ direct imports of the subject merchandise from China, and U.S. producers’

shipments of domestically produced product, by firms, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Firm

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value of U.S. producers’ direct imports from China ($1,000)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (26) 150,923 300,291 398,120 188,200 239,249

Value of domestically produced U.S. shipments ($1,000)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (26) 1,943,020 1,799,872 1,557,734 799,199 730,921

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-11

Table IV-5--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ direct imports of the subject merchandise from China, and U.S. producers’

shipments of domestically produced product, by firms, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Firm

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Ratio of U.S. producers’ direct imports from China to total imports from China (percent)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (26) 33.9 35.1 35.4 33.3 36.0

Ratio of U.S. producers’ direct imports to domestically produced U.S. shipments (percent)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Average (26) 7.8 16.7 25.6 23.5 32.7

1

 ***.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-12

Figure IV-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ imports of the subject merchandise from China (based on

value) as a share of reported U.S. imports of the subject merchandise from China, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 2004

6.9%

7.9%

8.3%

6.5%

6.1%

25.0%

21.0%

23.3%

26.1%

25.4%

4.0%

4.3%

3.9%

2.5%

2.4%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Jan.-June 2004

Jan.-June 2003

2003

2002

2001

Share of reported U.S. imports from China (percent)

 Firms in support of petition Firms in opposition to petition Firms taking no position on petition

Source: Table D-4.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-13

Figure IV-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ direct imports from China (based on value) as a ratio to

those producers’ domestically produced U.S. shipments, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June

2004

32.7%

23.5%

7.8%

16.7%

25.6%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Ratio (percent of value)

Source: Table IV-5.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-14

Table IV-6

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ production, U.S. producers’ direct imports from China, and ratios of

imports to production, by firms, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

U.S. production (pieces)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

 Total (26) 10,662,770 10,387,888 9,571,305 5,072,991 4,833,479

U.S. producers’ direct imports from China (pieces)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

 Total (26) 978,888 1,896,684 2,212,613 1,109,218 1,279,920

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-15

Table IV-6--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ imports from China and ratios of imports to production, by firms, 2001-03,

January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

U.S. producers’ direct imports from China as a ratio to their U.S. production (percent)

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

 Average (26) 9.2 18.3 23.1 21.9 26.5 1

 ***.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-16

Table IV-7

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. production, U.S. imports, and ratios of U.S. imports to U.S. production, by source, 2001-03,

January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

U.S. production1 13,987,146 13,872,218 12,712,592 6,727,891 6,555,543

U.S. imports from:2

China3 3,326,551 6,083,138 7,437,461 3,655,470 4,373,729

Nonsubject:

Brazil 439,118 563,748 662,749 265,043 355,901

Indonesia 403,070 504,549 497,496 240,091 271,317

Malaysia 414,797 595,869 786,471 358,352 384,978

Mexico 889,993 819,681 644,509 355,227 275,133

Vietnam 20 56,771 280,407 115,607 274,215

All other sources 1,869,569 1,992,977 2,630,428 1,271,318 1,490,857

Subtotal, nonsubject 4,016,567 4,533,595 5,502,060 2,605,638 3,052,401

Total, imports 7,343,118 10,616,732 12,939,521 6,261,108 7,426,130

Quantity (pounds)

U.S. production1 1,151,087,815 1,166,303,093 1,073,777,550 560,845,453 556,256,575

U.S. imports from:2

China3 215,225,940 440,316,557 540,473,652 253,676,054 334,604,694

Nonsubject:

Brazil 35,773,045 41,692,007 47,137,960 18,364,567 22,142,137

Indonesia 27,000,045 35,486,530 39,607,540 17,088,964 21,687,246

Malaysia 29,812,069 49,513,821 62,300,894 29,574,228 28,229,012

Mexico 37,429,404 40,352,004 32,045,155 15,587,005 13,442,760

Vietnam 0 4,721,683 19,067,096 7,387,649 13,596,856

All other sources 120,612,435 154,700,035 196,618,456 97,132,334 121,080,579

Subtotal, nonsubject 250,626,998 326,466,080 396,777,101 185,134,747 220,178,590

Total 465,852,938 766,782,637 937,250,753 438,810,801 554,783,284

Ratio of U.S. imports to U.S. production (percent, pieces)

U.S. imports from:2

China3 23.8 43.9 58.5 54.3 66.7

Nonsubject:

Brazil 3.1 4.1 5.2 3.9 5.4

Indonesia 2.9 3.6 3.9 3.6 4.1

Malaysia 3.0 4.3 6.2 5.3 5.9

Mexico 6.4 5.9 5.1 5.3 4.2

Vietnam 0.0 0.4 2.2 1.7 4.2

All other sources 13.4 14.4 20.7 18.9 22.7

Subtotal, nonsubject 28.7 32.7 43.3 38.7 46.6

Total 52.5 76.5 101.8 93.1 113.3

Ratio of U.S. imports to U.S. production (percent, pounds)

U.S. imports from:2

China3 18.7 37.8 50.3 45.2 60.2

Nonsubject:

Brazil 3.1 3.6 4.4 3.3 4.0

Indonesia 2.3 3.0 3.7 3.0 3.9

Malaysia 2.6 4.2 5.8 5.3 5.1

Mexico 3.3 3.5 3.0 2.8 2.4

Vietnam 0.0 0.4 1.8 1.3 2.4

All other sources 10.5 13.3 18.3 17.3 21.8

Subtotal, nonsubject 21.8 28.0 37.0 33.0 39.6

Total 40.5 65.7 87.3 78.2 99.7 1

 Two firms, Country Craft and Khoury, provided only limited or non-usable data; therefore, these firms are not included in the U.S.

producer trade or employment data. Two other firms, Modern and Thornwood, provided data in the preliminary phase investigation but

not in the final phase investigation. 2

 Based on data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 

3

 Includes imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-17

Table D-4 in appendix D presents U.S. producers’ imports from China and their shares of subject

imports, by firm and by position taken with respect to the petition.

U.S. producers were requested to indicate whether they imported or purchased wooden bedroom

furniture parts from China for the purpose of assembling completed pieces of wooden bedroom furniture

in the United States. Of the 44 firms that responded, all responded in the negative except for ***, which

imported parts. Only *** indicated that it had made arrangements for the importation or purchase of

wooden bedroom furniture parts from China since the petition was filed.

APPARENT U.S. CONSUMPTION AND U.S. MARKET SHARES

Table IV-8 and figure IV-5 present data on apparent U.S. consumption and market shares of

wooden bedroom furniture.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-18

Table IV-8

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. shipments of domestic product, U.S. imports, by sources, apparent U.S.

consumption, and market shares, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value ($1,000)

U.S. producers’ domestic shipments 2,294,304 2,150,147 1,878,740 960,833 899,223

U.S. imports:1

China (subject) *** *** *** *** ***

Nonsubject:

China (Markor Tianjin) *** *** *** *** ***

Brazil 73,216 98,903 110,647 48,479 63,671

Indonesia 130,165 151,394 149,487 72,406 87,398

Malaysia 44,897 67,979 114,588 50,301 74,802

Mexico 145,171 127,553 98,227 49,222 44,499

Vietnam 860 10,871 45,454 15,924 48,300

All other sources 869,420 896,807 867,626 426,596 427,926

Subtotal, nonsubject *** *** *** *** ***

Total, all imports 1,829,281 2,311,456 2,787,927 1,287,529 1,618,423

Apparent U.S. consumption 4,123,585 4,461,603 4,666,667 2,248,362 2,517,646

Share of value (percent)

U.S. producers’ domestic shipments 55.6 48.2 40.3 42.7 35.7

U.S. imports:1

China (subject) *** *** *** *** ***

Nonsubject:

China (Markor Tianjin) *** *** *** *** ***

Brazil 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.5

Indonesia 3.2 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.5

Malaysia 1.1 1.5 2.5 2.2 3.0

Mexico 3.5 2.9 2.1 2.2 1.8

Vietnam 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.7 1.9

All other sources 21.1 20.1 18.6 19.0 17.0

Subtotal, nonsubject *** *** *** *** ***

Total, all imports 44.4 51.8 59.7 57.3 64.3

1

 Official import statistics presented for wooden bedroom furniture are comprised of two HTS statistical reporting numbers: 

9403.50.9040 (wooden beds of a kind used in the bedroom) and 9403.50.9080 (wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom

not elsewhere classified). The scope mentions four HTSUS subheadings and statistical reporting numbers; however, most of the

subject imports enter under 9403.50.9040 and 9403.50.9080. The third number, HTS subheading 9403.90.70, contains, among

other items, certain metal furniture parts and certain unfinished furniture parts made of wood products. The fourth number, HTS

subheading 7009.92.50, is a residual or “basket” category that contains, among other items, framed glass mirrors of a kind used

in the bedroom. To the extent that subject imports enter under the latter subheadings, import data may be slightly understated.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires and Commerce data.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

IV-19

Figure IV-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: Apparent U.S. consumption, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and

January-June 2004

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

5,000,000

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Value ($1,000) 

 U.S. producers Imports from China* Imports from all other sources

* Includes imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

Source: Table IV-8.

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 This figure is based on data from subheading 9403.50.90 of the HTS.

V-1

PART V: PRICING AND RELATED INFORMATION

FACTORS AFFECTING PRICES

Transportation Costs

The cost to transport wooden bedroom furniture from China to the U.S. market was estimated

from official import data. It represents the cost of wooden bedroom furniture plus insurance and freight

compared to its customs value, which is the f.o.b. value at the foreign port. The ratio of the cost of ocean

freight and insurance to the customs value was approximately 20 percent during 2003 and January to July

of 2004.1

U.S. producers and importers were asked to report the percentage of the total delivered costs of

their wooden bedroom furniture that is accounted for by U.S. inland transportation costs. The mean

response of 25 reporting producers was 7.2 percent, and the similar figure for the 61 reporting importers

was 10.8 percent.

 Out of 46 reporting U.S. producers, 30 reported that they generally make the arrangements to ship

wooden bedroom furniture to their customers; 14 reported that the purchaser usually makes the

arrangements; and two reported using both methods. Out of 88 responding importers, 63 reported that

they generally make the arrangements to ship wooden bedroom furniture to their customers, 24 reported

that the purchaser usually makes arrangements, and one reported that both methods were commonly used. 

U.S. producers reported that, on average, 11.8 percent, 60.3 percent, and 27.9 percent of their sales were

within 100 miles, between 101 and 1,000 miles, and over 1,000 miles of their production facilities,

respectively. U.S. importers reported that, on average, 28.2 percent, 44.4 percent, and 27.4 percent of

their sales were within 100 miles, between 101 and 1,000 miles, and over 1,000 miles of their storage

facilities, respectively.

Exchange Rates

Quarterly data reported by the International Monetary Fund indicate that the nominal value of the

Chinese yuan was fixed at 8.3 yuan per U.S. dollar between the first quarter of 2001 and the second

quarter of 2004. A producer price index was unavailable for most of this period; therefore, a real

exchange rate was not calculated. 

Types of Customers

The Commission asked producers and importers to discuss how their selling prices for wooden

bedroom furniture differed by type of customer. *** reported that it has two types of customers: 

purchasing agents that work on the behalf of a property owner, such as a hotel, and the owners

themselves. Sales to agents typically involve multiple bidders, are highly competitive, and may require

steep discounts to win the order. Direct sales to owners are typically less competitive and are often under

national programs. Many producers reported that all customers pay the same price. *** reported that the

hospitality sector receives larger discounts because of the size of its orders. *** stated that distributors

often receive a discount. *** stated that qualified distributors receive a ***-percent discount off of the
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 2 The Commission asked for price ranges of the good, better, and best tiers, but did not specify what the prices

were for. Thus, some purchasers reported prices for different pieces of furniture, and some reported for suites. Even

given these different interpretations, the reported price ranges are very different. For example, *** reported good,

better, and best ranges of $2,500 per piece, $5,000 per piece, and $7,000 per piece for its good, better, and best

ranges, while *** reported a good range of $529 to $799 for a 7-piece set. Most purchasers, however, simply

reported prices and did not specify what the ranges were for. 

V-2

list price for selected suites and that non-distributors that purchase over $*** per year get a ***-percent

rebate at year end. Some producers reported that they only sell to retailers. 

Many importers similarly reported that selling prices did not differ by type of customer. A few

importers stated that distributors receive discounts of around *** percent so that they can remain

competitive after the representative’s commission. *** reported that business with the hospitality sector

is low margin, high volume, and high risk because the furniture must be made within a short time with

high penalties if delivery is unmet.

Quality Tiers

Although purchasers generally agreed that there are quality tiers as reported in Part II, there was

no consensus on the limits of the price ranges for the tiers.2

 For example, *** reported good, better, and

best ranges of, respectively, $100 to $500, $500 to $1,000, and over $1,000. *** reported ranges of

$3,300 to $6,499, $6,500 to $14,999, and over $15,000, respectively for its good, better, and best ranges.

PRICING PRACTICES

Virtually all U.S. producers reported that they use price lists to establish prices. *** reported that

price lists are typically how the product is priced and sold. List prices are based on margin requirements

and market conditions. *** stated that it uses a price list for sales to retailers and sells by individual

transactions to the hospitality sector. Importers similarly usually use price lists, although not as uniformly

so as producers. *** reported that its price list is based on underlying cost, market demand, competition,

and target margins. *** reported that it sells at average mark-ups of *** to *** percent of f.o.b. costs for

warehouse shipments and *** to *** percent for direct container shipments. Several importers reported

that they simply add standard operating margins to the landed cost. *** reported that it sets price based

on the expected sales rate and target profit level and that margins average *** to *** percent for Chinese

wooden bedroom furniture. *** stated that different items have different margins and that the goal is to

project the mix of sales by style to meet financial goals.

U.S. producer *** stated that it has no set discount policy but may discount items in reaction to

competitive pricing. *** stated that its sales representatives may discount up to *** percent and that

management must approve any larger discounts. It added that occasionally volume discounts are offered

to major customers. *** stated that it only discounts *** percent off its list price to customers with over

$*** in annual purchases and that meet its net 30-day terms. *** stated that it provides total volume

discounts, but was forced to discount all wood products by *** percent in the fall of 2002 in order to

remain competitive with imports. Some other producers reported not offering discounts, and others

reported offering annual volume discounts or discounts to promote a particular item.

Some importers reported that they do not waiver from the price list, but others reported that they

discount based on annual volume and to promote certain items. *** stated that it discounts when it

believes that the quantity response will more than justify the drop in margin.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 3 The firms are: ***.

V-3

Almost all producers reported that their payment terms were net 30 days. Importers stated that

net 30 days was their most typical payment term. Most U.S. producers reported quoting prices on the

basis of f.o.b their plant or warehouse, but a few reported quoting on a delivered basis. Importers

reported that prices were usually quoted f.o.b. their warehouse, although a few quote on the basis of a

foreign port or on a delivered basis.

Both producers and importers reported that they sell primarily in the spot market. The mean

response of 44 producers was that 90.5 percent, 8.4 percent, and 1.1 percent of their 2003 sales were,

respectively, spot-market sales, short-term contracts, and long-term contracts. Importers reported that 

80.6 percent of their 2003 sales of subject wooden bedroom furniture were in the spot market, that 16.8

percent were short-term contracts, and that 2.6 percent were long-term contracts. 

Producers and importers were asked if their prices of wooden bedroom furniture are negotiated on

a piece basis or a suite basis. Out of 39 responding producers, 69.2 percent stated they negotiated on a

piece basis and 30.8 percent stated they negotiated on a suite basis. Out of 82 responding importers, 81.7

percent stated they negotiated on a piece basis and 18.3 percent stated they negotiated on a suite basis. 

Out of 84 responding purchasers, 63.1 percent, 32.1 percent, and 4.8 percent reported that they negotiate

prices, respectively, by piece, by suite, or by both methods. Many of those that reported negotiating by

the suite stated that individual pieces are also priced.

PRICE DATA

The Commission requested that U.S. producers and importers of wooden bedroom furniture

report the total quantity and f.o.b. value of wooden bedroom furniture shipped to unrelated customers in

the U.S. market. Quarterly data were requested from the first quarter of 2001 to the second quarter of

2004. The products for which pricing data were requested are presented in table V-1 (Louis Philippestyle wooden bedroom furniture suite) and table V-2 (Mission-style wooden bedroom furniture suite). 

Each individual bed, dresser, mirror, or nightstand is treated as a separate pricing product. Figures V-1

and V-2 present examples of Louis Philippe-style and Mission-style wooden bedroom furniture suites,

respectively. Figure V-3 presents examples of pricing product 1 (Louis Philippe-style) pieces. Figure V4 presents examples of pricing product 2 (Mission-style) pieces. 

The Commission also requested that purchasers report quantities and values of purchases of

product from unrelated U.S. producers, from importers of the subject product from China, and directly

from Chinese producers. Purchasers similarly reported quarterly data from the first quarter of 2001 to the

second quarter of 2004. In all cases, purchasers were asked to report delivered values net of returns,

discounts, allowances, and rebates but including U.S.-inland freight charges. 

A total of 52 U.S. producers and importers provided usable pricing data for sales of the requested

products, although not all firms reported pricing for all products for all quarters.3

 Some firms provided

data for both the imported and the domestic products, and some U.S. producers did not provide data

because they are vertically integrated and have no arms-length sales except at the retail level to final

consumers. From the first quarter of 2001 to the second quarter of 2004, U.S. producers’ pricing data

accounted for approximately 3.1 percent of reporting U.S. producers’ shipments of wooden bedroom 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-4

Table V-1

Description of pricing product 1 (Louis Philippe-style wooden bedroom furniture suite)

Product 1-A: Queen-size Louis Philippe-style sleigh bed (with wooden side rails)1

(1) Panel sleigh headboard and panel sleigh footboard, made with either flat or curved panels, and wooden

side rails;

(2) Constructed of hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, with or without plywood, no

all solid hardwood headboards or footboards, side rails may be made of plywood;

(3) Made for use with queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but including headboards and footboards designed to

accommodate both full-size (4 feet-six inches) and queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but not just full size (4

feet-six inches) only; and 

(4) Combined weight of headboard, footboard, and side rails not to exceed 175 pounds total, when

uncartoned and unpacked.

Product 1-B: Louis Philippe-style double dresser (with 6-8 drawers)

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solidhardwood dressers;

(2) Height ranging from 32.5-38.0 inches and width ranging from 62.0-69.0 inches.

Product 1-C: Mirrors sold with Louis Philippe-style double dresser

(1) Include all mirrors sold with above Louis Philippe-style double dresser.

Product 1-D: Louis Philippe-style two and three drawer nightstands (with no doors)

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solidhardwood nightstands;

(2) Height ranging from 23.0-29.0 inches and width ranging from 23.0-29.0 inches.

1

 Report quantities and values of complete beds, including headboard, footboard, and side rails. For example, if you shipped

100 headboards, 90 footboards, and 80 pairs of side rails, then report quantities and values for 80 complete beds, using average

unit values for all 100 headboards and all 90 footboards to calculate the total value of 80 headboards and 80 footboards to add to

the value of the 80 pairs of side rails.

Table V-2

Description of pricing product 2 (Mission-style wooden bedroom furniture suite)

Product 2-A: Queen-size Mission-style slat bed (with wooden side rails)1

(1) Slat headboard, slat footboard, and wooden side rails;

(2) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids or hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or

fiberboard, side rails may be made of plywood;

(3) Made for use with queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but including headboards and footboards designed to

accommodate both full-size (4 feet-six inches) and queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but not just full size (4

feet-six inches) only; and 

(4) Combined weight of headboard, footboard, and side rails not to exceed 130 pounds total, when

uncartoned and unpacked.

Product 2-B: Mission-style dresser (with 8-10 drawers–no doors or 6-8 drawers and 1 or 2 doors)

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solidhardwood dressers;

(2) Height ranging from 34-38 inches and width ranging from 62-67 inches.

Product 2-C: Mirrors sold with above Mission-style dresser

(1) Include all mirrors sold with the above Mission-style dresser.

Product 2-D: Mission-style two- and three-drawer nightstands (no doors)

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solidhardwood nightstands;

(2) Height ranging from 22.5-29.5 inches.

1

 Report quantities and values of complete beds, including headboard, footboard, and side rails. For example, if you shipped

100 headboards, 90 footboards, and 80 pairs of side rails, then report quantities and values for 80 complete beds, using average

unit values for all 100 headboards and all 90 footboards to calculate the total value of 80 headboards and 80 footboards to add to

the value of the 80 pairs of side rails.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-5

Figure V-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: Example of a Louis Philippe-style suite

Source: Rhodes Furniture (www.rhodesfurniture.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-6

Figure V-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Example of a Mission-style suite

Source: Rooms To Go (www.roomstogo.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-7

Figure V-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Examples of Product 1 pieces (Louis Philippe style)

Product 1-A (bed) Product 1-B (double dresser)

Product 1-C (mirror) Product 1-D (nightstand)

Source: Rooms To Go (www.roomstogo.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-8

Figure V-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: Examples of Product 2 pieces (Mission style)

Product 2-A (bed) Product 2-B (double dresser)

Product 2-C (mirror) Product 2-D (nightstand)

Source: Rooms To Go (www.roomstogo.com).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 4 Pricing data on imports reported by U.S. producers accounted for 13.6 percent of total pricing data for imports

of wooden bedroom furniture. Prices reported by U.S. producers tended to be higher than those reported by other

importers (see staff notes, “Was producers’ import pricing data less than that of regular importers?” November 15,

2004).

 5

 The importers’ pricing data may include nonsubject imports from Markor Tianjin.

V-9

furniture by value. For the similar period, the reported importers’ data accounted for 4.6 percent of the

subject imports from China by value.4 5

Price Trends

Prices trended downward for most of the eight pricing products for domestic producers; price

trends were mixed for imports from China (figures V-5 through V-12). Percentage changes between

prices in the first quarter of 2001 and the second quarter of 2004 are shown in table V-3.

Table V-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Percentage changes of weighted-average prices for domestic and imported

products, January-March 2001 through April-June 2004

United States China

Louis Philippe-style sleigh bed (product 1A) -26.8 17.0

Louis Philippe-style double dresser (product 1B) -11.6 -21.6

Mirror sold with product 1B (product 1C) -21.2 -37.6

Louis Philippe-style nightstands (product 1D) -7.6 -20.4

Mission-style bed (product 2A) -6.3 8.0

Mission-style dresser (product 2B) 2.6 9.2

Mirror sold product 2B (product 2C) -16.3 -19.4

Mission-style nightstands (product 2D) -14.4 2.1

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-10

Figure V-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese Louis Philippe-style sleigh beds

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Figure V-6

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese Louis Philippe-style double dressers

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

150

200

250

300

350

400

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China

150

200

250

300

350

400

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-11

Figure V-7

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese mirrors sold with Louis Philippe-style double dressers 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Figure V-8

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese Louis Philippe-style nightstands

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

25

50

75

100

125

150

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China

75

100

125

150

175

200

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-12

Figure V-9

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese Mission-style beds

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Figure V-10

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese Mission-style dressers

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

150

200

250

300

350

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-13

Figure V-11

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported mirrors sold with Mission-style dressers 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Figure V-12

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices (dollars per piece) of U.S.-produced and

imported Chinese Mission-style nightstands

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

25

50

75

100

125

150

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

2001 2002 2003 2004

U.S. China
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 6 Prehearing brief of the Furniture Retailers of America, pp. 18-19. 

 7

 Lacquer Craft’s posthearing brief, part II, p. 5.

 8

 Posthearing brief of the Furniture Retailers of America, p. 9, n. 32.

 9

 Differences in methodology apparently account for the slight discrepancies between these figures and those

reported by the Furniture Retailers of America in its posthearing brief, pp. 9-10.

V-14

Furniture Retailers of America stated that the price series of similar domestic and imported

products should converge if they truly compete with each other, and that the lack of convergence shows

that imports do not influence prices of the domestic products.6

 Lacquer Craft alleged that the firm-level 

data show that U.S. producers made *** and that the declining trends in the aggregate data result largely

from “changes in the *** of sales reported by different U.S. producers–i.e., changes in the *** of

producers over time in the average price calculations.”7

 The Furniture Retailers of America similarly

stated that the firm-level data are more indicative of actual prices given the apparent wide variation in

quality among different firms and that declining trends in the aggregate data are “illusions reflecting shifts

in individual producer volumes and price point mixes over time, and not actual price declines.”8

 Staff

examined the percentage changes in producer prices between the initial and final quarters for which

producers reported data, provided that data were reported for at least half of the 14 quarters for which the

Commission requested data. Following this approach yielded 81 firm-level percentage changes, of which

44 were increases, 36 were decreases, and 1 did not change (table V-4).9

Table V-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: Percentage changes between firm-level producer prices for domestic

product, by firm and by product, January-March 2001 through April-June 2004

*******

Price Comparisons

In the data received from producers and importers for the eight individual pieces, the imported

Chinese product undersold the similar domestic product in each of the 112 quarters for which the

Commission gathered data. Underselling margins ranged from 15.9 to 50.7 percent for product 1-A (table

V-5), from 35.1 to 47.0 percent for product 1-B (table V-6), from 44.6 to 61.1 percent for product 1-C

(table V-7), from 30.9 to 43.5 percent for product 1-D (table V-8), from 29.0 to 52.4 percent for product

2-A (table V-9), from 27.8 to 57.3 percent for product 2-B (table V-10), from 27.5 to 50.2 percent for

product 2-C (table V-11), and from 36.5 to 55.3 percent for product 2-D (table V-12).

 Purchaser prices are shown in tables V-13 to V-20. Purchases directly from Chinese

manufacturers were priced less than purchases of the comparable U.S. product in 97 quarters and priced

more than the U.S. product in 10 quarters. Purchases of Chinese product from U.S. importers were priced

less than purchases of the comparable U.S. product in 85 quarters and priced more than the U.S. product

in 27 quarters.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-15

Table V-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 1-A1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $360.46 12,329 $177.84 4,783 50.7

April-June 345.14 13,267 193.83 6,848 43.8

July-September 344.80 13,096 187.86 7,650 45.5

October-December 336.51 11,198 194.37 9,457 42.2

2002:

January-March 346.08 12,997 182.53 12,016 47.3

April-June 332.68 11,377 180.75 16,530 45.7

July-September 350.32 9,286 185.39 14,547 47.1

October-December 294.00 7,454 192.90 17,976 34.4

2003:

January-March 267.92 10,413 215.11 17,863 19.7

April-June 269.96 10,259 212.44 22,257 21.3

July-September 258.33 12,332 216.03 23,452 16.4

October-December 256.40 10,872 215.70 29,034 15.9

2004:

January-March 258.44 11,370 204.65 26,816 20.8

April-June 263.81 9,254 208.04 25,482 21.1

1 Product 1-A.–Queen-size Louis Philippe-style sleigh bed (with wooden side rails):

(1) Panel sleigh headboard and panel sleigh footboard, made with either flat or curved panels, and wooden side rails;

(2) Constructed of hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, with or without plywood, no all solid 

hardwood headboards or footboards, side rails may be made of plywood;

(3) Made for use with queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but including headboards and footboards designed to accommodate both

full-size (4 feet-six inches) and queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but not just full size (4 feet-six inches) only; and 

(4) Combined weight of headboard, footboard, and side rails not to exceed 175 pounds total, when uncartoned and 

unpacked.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-16

Table V-6

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 1-B1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $357.65 12,316 $231.34 1,339 35.3

April-June 339.37 13,107 220.37 2,069 35.1

July-September 343.21 14,159 216.13 3,136 37.0

October-December 347.91 11,207 215.96 4,708 37.9

2002:

January-March 343.79 13,074 217.44 6,375 36.8

April-June 351.22 11,702 201.19 10,284 42.7

July-September 366.11 9,527 194.01 10,256 47.0

October-December 361.78 7,643 199.97 14,126 44.7

2003:

January-March 343.92 9,446 201.35 12,262 41.5

April-June 350.22 8,413 195.23 15,389 44.3

July-September 334.01 10,479 192.52 19,056 42.4

October-December 319.09 8,667 185.76 21,490 41.8

2004:

January-March 320.35 9,489 180.74 20,294 43.6

April-June 316.18 7,729 181.39 20,356 42.6

1 Product 1-B.–Louis Philippe-style double dresser (6-8 drawers):

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solid-hardwood dressers;

(2) Height ranging from 32.5-38.0 inches and width ranging from 62.0-69.0 inches.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-17

Table V-7

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 1-C1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $139.85 11,867 $77.50 1,536 44.6

April-June 128.65 12,944 67.88 2,098 47.2

July-September 132.63 13,561 66.22 3,039 50.1

October-December 133.61 11,003 64.19 4,430 52.0

2002:

January-March 132.52 12,743 57.97 5,898 56.3

April-June 128.03 12,313 53.83 9,830 58.0

July-September 137.43 9,434 57.65 8,601 58.1

October-December 131.55 8,584 51.20 13,178 61.1

2003:

January-March 122.70 9,775 52.77 10,771 57.0

April-June 120.66 9,006 49.11 13,585 59.3

July-September 115.70 10,473 50.98 17,939 55.9

October-December 114.26 9,455 49.55 19,850 56.6

2004:

January-March 111.79 9,262 48.49 18,588 56.6

April-June 110.21 8,001 48.32 19,120 56.2

1 Product 1-C.–Mirrors sold with Louis Philippe-style double dresser:

(1) Include all mirrors sold with above Louis Philippe-style double dresser.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-18

Table V-8

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 1-D1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $166.16 25,645 $111.85 2,440 32.7

April-June 162.41 25,297 112.28 3,181 30.9

July-September 163.65 26,684 105.59 5,747 35.5

October-December 166.95 21,215 103.29 7,704 38.1

2002:

January-March 164.15 26,238 105.72 9,989 35.6

April-June 166.27 24,580 99.21 16,805 40.3

July-September 169.01 20,591 95.55 16,919 43.5

October-December 161.80 18,034 91.93 24,171 43.2

2003:

January-March 152.34 21,925 94.29 21,383 38.1

April-June 157.31 18,923 93.42 23,959 40.6

July-September 147.84 23,559 89.64 28,925 39.4

October-December 151.52 19,269 90.66 34,597 40.2

2004:

January-March 148.89 22,068 87.70 30,387 41.1

April-June 153.55 17,684 88.98 32,663 42.1

1 Product 1-D.–Louis Philippe-style two and three drawer nightstands (with no doors):

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solid-hardwood

nightstands;

(2) Height ranging from 23.0-29.0 inches and width ranging from 23.0-29.0 inches.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-19

Table V-9

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 2-A1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $340.40 4,958 $171.85 2,416 49.5

April-June 335.86 4,452 159.95 3,317 52.4

July-September 349.38 4,787 187.76 4,395 46.3

October-December 331.88 4,612 212.47 4,056 36.0

2002:

January-March 325.62 4,612 173.56 6,466 46.7

April-June 317.22 3,786 216.46 5,395 31.8

July-September 324.25 3,426 219.64 6,120 32.3

October-December 310.24 3,453 220.42 6,682 29.0

2003:

January-March 312.23 2,982 189.95 6,665 39.2

April-June 298.17 2,823 188.69 8,122 36.7

July-September 290.19 2,428 181.01 12,673 37.6

October-December 295.16 1,630 190.28 10,006 35.5

2004:

January-March 317.16 1,732 172.89 11,564 45.5

April-June 318.99 1,311 185.59 9,963 41.8

1 Product 2-A.–Queen-size Mission-style slat bed (with wooden side rails):

(1) Slat headboard, slat footboard, and wooden side rails;

(2) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids or hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, side rails

may be made of plywood;

(3) Made for use with queen-size (5 feet) bedding, including headboards and footboards designed to accommodate both full-size

(4 feet-six inches) and queen-size (5 feet) bedding, but not just full size (4 feet-six inches) only; and

(4) Combined weight of headboard, footboard, and side rails not to exceed 130 pounds total, when uncartoned and unpacked.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-20

Table V-10

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 2-B1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $429.81 5,399 $184.48 2,351 57.1

April-June 422.87 4,467 180.39 2,993 57.3

July-September 410.38 5,067 217.42 5,556 47.0

October-December 409.10 4,109 225.48 5,936 44.9

2002:

January-March 400.98 4,354 228.74 7,340 43.0

April-June 408.26 3,901 230.60 6,781 43.5

July-September 407.00 3,445 240.72 6,337 40.9

October-December 325.14 4,505 234.65 6,192 27.8

2003:

January-March 407.06 2,676 232.26 7,449 42.9

April-June 414.97 2,437 211.48 7,416 49.0

July-September 408.11 2,784 214.58 11,026 47.4

October-December 404.71 1,403 219.52 10,121 45.8

2004:

January-March 433.82 1,501 207.22 9,608 52.2

April-June 441.04 1,284 201.45 10,358 54.3

1 Product 2-B.–Mission style dresser (with 8-10 drawers–no doors or 6-8 drawers and 1 or 2 doors):

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solid-hardwood dressers;

(2) Height ranging from 34-38 inches and width ranging from 62-67 inches.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-21

Table V-11

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 2-C1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $130.10 4,906 $67.30 1,332 48.3

April-June 121.72 4,355 63.26 1,923 48.0

July-September 119.94 4,999 78.10 3,847 34.9

October-December 114.02 3,833 77.20 4,251 32.3

2002:

January-March 111.50 4,447 65.39 5,474 41.4

April-June 115.38 3,811 68.31 4,589 40.8

July-September 114.60 3,355 65.42 4,871 42.9

October-December 90.85 4,615 65.85 4,675 27.5

2003:

January-March 115.29 2,842 60.95 5,811 47.1

April-June 110.64 2,552 56.01 6,172 49.4

July-September 110.28 2,437 58.61 9,279 46.9

October-December 101.13 1,591 56.17 8,126 44.5

2004:

January-March 103.55 1,684 52.80 7,524 49.0

April-June 108.90 1,445 54.22 7,086 50.2

1 Product 2-C.–Mirrors sold with above Mission-style dresser:

(1) Include all mirrors sold with the above Mission-style dresser.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-22

Table V-12

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average f.o.b. prices and quantities of domestic and imported product 2-D1

 and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

Period

United States China

Price Quantity Price Quantity Margin

Per piece Pieces Per piece Pieces Percent

2001:

January-March $189.54 8,874 $84.79 3,920 55.3

April-June 186.32 7,890 84.12 5,217 54.9

July-September 181.79 8,609 99.44 9,747 45.3

October-December 180.96 7,315 100.47 10,072 44.5

2002:

January-March 180.37 7,451 93.44 12,174 48.2

April-June 179.12 6,975 94.77 11,702 47.1

July-September 177.83 6,217 96.24 10,786 45.9

October-December 149.93 8,141 95.22 10,730 36.5

2003:

January-March 172.85 5,406 93.28 11,632 46.0

April-June 179.58 4,665 88.05 11,571 51.0

July-September 160.61 4,482 93.81 16,332 41.6

October-December 159.92 3,015 90.81 14,677 43.2

2004:

January-March 156.06 3,342 89.42 14,253 42.7

April-June 162.21 2,723 86.57 15,547 46.6

1 Product 2-D.–Mission style two and three drawer nightstands (with no doors):

(1) Constructed of predominantly hardwood solids and veneers over particle board or fiberboard, no all-solid-hardwood

nightstands;

(2) Height ranging from 22.5-29.5 inches.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-23

Table V-13

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

1-A from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******

Table V-14

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

1-B from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******

Table V-15

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

1-C from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******

Table V-16

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

1-D from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-24

Table V-17

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

2-A from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******

Table V-18

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

2-B from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******

Table V-19

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

2-C from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******

Table V-20

Wooden bedroom furniture: Weighted-average delivered prices and quantities of purchases of product

2-D from U.S. producers, directly from Chinese producers, and from importers of product from China, and

margins of underselling/(overselling), by quarters, January 2001-June 2004

*******
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 10 Petitioners’ prehearing brief, p. 39.

 11 Petitioners’ posthearing brief, p. 5 and exh. 4.

 12 Lacquer Craft’s prehearing brief, pp. 38-39.

 13 Prehearing brief of the Furniture Retailers of America, p. 18.

 14 Petitioners’ prehearing brief, p. 43.

 15 Posthearing brief of the Coalition of Certain China Furniture Producers, p. 2.

 16 Besides these allegations, *** made additional allegations with no contact information. Information was

lacking even in those allegations on which staff could follow up. For example, the product was always described as

custom wooden bedroom furniture with no specification of quantity or the competing import price.

V-25

Petitioners stated that subject imports adversely affected the prices of the domestic like product

because many subject imports are copies of domestic products and compete directly with the domestic

product.10 They added that in the producer-importer data underselling was universal, underselling

margins were large, and producer sales declined while sales of the subject product registered large

increases.11 In the producer-importer data, quantities declined for each of the domestic products, and

quantities of the imported products usually much more than tripled.

Lacquer Craft stated that the size and consistency of the price gaps between the domestic and

subject imported pricing products suggests that the domestic and imported products are physically

different and targeted at different customers and are not related to the dumping margins found by

Commerce.12 Furniture Retailers of America stated that the data show that the domestic pricing products

do not significantly compete with the subject imports.13

LOST SALES AND LOST REVENUES

Lost Sales

When asked if they had lost sales of U.S.-produced wooden bedroom furniture to imports from

China since January 2001, 22 producers responded in the affirmative and 11 in the negative. Although

few producers provided the detailed information to permit staff to contact firms to verify the allegations,

several of them made anecdotal remarks. *** alleged that it lost many floor placements to imported

product in its *** lines. *** believes that low-priced imports have had an industry-wide effect on lost

sales. *** stated that it knew the Chinese product had replaced its product because its sales

representatives could see the Chinese product on the floors of various retailers, but the retailers would not

disclose price information on the imported products. 

Petitioners stated that their loss of retail floor space as reported by purchasers is another

manifestation of lost sales.14 However, respondents stated that retailers reported allocating floor space

based on “price, quality, design, style, availability, brand names, and the overall likelihood that the item

will sell,” and that the allocation of floor space was not linked to competition with unfairly priced

imports.15

*** alleged that it lost a sale of approximately *** (first allegation in table V-21). ***. He

added that ***.

*** reported 20 verifiable allegations of lost sales, which totaled $*** and which it said had

occurred since filing the petition in October 2003.16 Staff attempted to verify the 10 largest of these,
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-26

which totaled $*** (table V-21). Eight firms in these allegations responded, but *** and *** did not

respond. All of these transactions were ***.

Table V-21

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ lost sales allegations

*******

***.

***. He added that he would have been glad to explain to them the reasons why they were not

selected, if they had called, because he believes that such information is good for competition. 

***.

***.

***.

***.

***.

Lost Revenues

When asked if they had reduced prices since January 2001 to avoid losing sales of U.S.-produced

wooden bedroom furniture, 10 producers responded affirmatively and 18 responded negatively. When

asked if they had delayed announced price increases since January 2001 to avoid losing sales of U.S.-

produced wooden bedroom furniture, five producers responded in the affirmative and 23 in the negative. 

Although few producers provided the detailed information that would permit staff to contact firms to

verify the allegations, several made anecdotal remarks. *** alleged that it reduced prices on all case

goods including wooden bedroom furniture in *** in an effort to stem the tide of imports. *** alleged

that it did not make its regular price increases, and has only had two price increases on selected units or a

limited number of sets because it did not believe that it could compete with the low price of imports from

China. *** stated that it was never able to get to a point where it could announce a price increase due to

downward price pressure from imports from China. *** did not increase prices for two years.

*** (table V-22). *** did not respond to the lost revenue allegation. ***.

Table V-22

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ allegations of lost revenue

*******
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 17 This section repeats the lost sales and lost revenue section of the staff report in the preliminary phase of the

investigation.

 18 All 16 of these reporting U.S. producers were not petitioners.

 19 A total of 15 U.S. producers alleged losing sales and/or revenues on their domestic wooden bedroom furniture

as a result of competition with the imported Chinese products, but were unable to provide details. Twelve of these

15 producers were petitioners and three firms were not petitioners.

 20 ***, two petitioning U.S. producers that alleged lost revenues but were unable to provide specific details, made

some additional comments in this part of their questionnaire responses. *** reported that it did not reduce prices

unique to any single customer, but had an overall price reduction on most of the firm’s case goods in early 2002. 

*** noted that it increased prices on its wooden bedroom furniture only *** since ***, but the increases were for a

selected number of sets only, no across-the-board increases. The firm did not feel it could compete with the

imported Chinese products if it raised prices across-the-board.

 21 The petition also contained several allegations of lost sales involving shipments to U.S. furniture retailers, but

these allegations involved very incomplete information that was insufficient for the staff to follow up.

 22 Staff chose the seven largest of the total 11 specific allegations of lost sales involving the hospitality sector,

which accounts for a relatively small portion of the total U.S. wooden bedroom furniture market, and all of the

specific allegations of lost sales and lost revenue involving the retail sector, which accounts for at least 90 percent of

the U.S. wooden bedroom furniture market.

V-27

Lost Sales and Lost Revenues from the Preliminary Phase Investigation17

The Commission requested U.S. producers of wooden bedroom furniture to report in their

questionnaire responses during the preliminary phase of this investigation any instances of lost sales or

revenues they experienced since January 1, 2000, due to competition from imports of wooden bedroom

furniture from China. Sixteen U.S. producers reported in their questionnaire responses that they had not

lost sales of their domestic wooden bedroom furniture due to competition with these products from China,

and 14 of these U.S. producers also reported that they had not lost revenues on sales of their domestic

wooden bedroom furniture due to competition with the imported Chinese products.18 Twelve U.S.

producers alleged in their questionnaire responses that due to competition with the imported Chinese

wooden bedroom furniture they had lost sales of their domestic wooden bedroom furniture and 11 U.S.

producers (eight of the previous 12 producers plus three additional producers) alleged that they had lost

revenues by reducing prices or rolling back price increases of their domestic wooden bedroom furniture,19

but were not able to provide specific examples of any such instances.20

Two petitioning U.S. producers, ***, reported in their questionnaire responses a total of four

specific instances of alleged lost sales and five instances of alleged lost revenues that involved

competition with imported Chinese wooden bedroom furniture; all such instances involved shipments to

U.S. retailers. Another petitioning producer, ***, reported in the petition 11 specific instances of alleged

lost sales; all such sales involved shipments to hospitality firms.21 The total dollar value of the alleged

specific lost sales and lost revenues could not be calculated because this information was not provided in

many of the allegations. For the 20 specific allegations which contained mostly complete information,

staff contacted the purchasers named in 16 of these allegations.22 Nine purchasers responded to staff’s

request for information regarding the specific allegations; eight purchasers responded to lost sales

allegations and one purchaser responded to a lost revenue allegation. A summary of the information

provided for the lost sales and lost revenue allegations that were reported by purchasers is shown in tables

V-23 and V-24, respectively, and a short discussion of purchaser responses follows.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-28

Table V-23

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ lost sales allegations

*******

Table V-24

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ lost revenue allegations

*******

*** named ***, ***, in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of a

total of *** pieces of domestic wooden bedroom furniture, sold by *** per suite, in competition with

wooden bedroom furniture from China. *** disagreed with the lost sales allegation, stating that the ***

bedroom set named in the allegation was replaced with a ***. This latter firm is a petitioning U.S.

producer.

*** named ***, ***, in a lost revenue allegation. *** asserted that in *** it was forced to reduce

its price for ***, totaling *** separate furniture pieces, from $*** per set to $*** per set to meet the price

of the imported Chinese products. *** disagreed with the lost revenue allegation. It stated that ***.”

*** named ***, in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of ***

domestic wooden bedroom sets, at a total value of $***, because of competition with the imported

Chinese products. *** reported the following information. ***.

*** named ***, ***, in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of ***

domestic wooden bedroom suites, at a total value of $***, because of competition with the imported

Chinese products. *** reported that it “strongly” disagreed with the lost sales allegation. It stated that

both the ***. It also stated, “***.” 

*** named ***, in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of ***

pieces of domestic wooden bedroom furniture because of competition with imported Chinese products. 

*** disagreed with the lost sales allegation. It provided a detailed response to the allegation, ***. The

separate response provided to staff regarding the allegation stated that the “***.” It also stated that “***.” 

*** named ***, ***, in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of ***

pieces of domestic wooden bedroom furniture, priced at $*** per suite, because of competition with

imported Chinese products. *** disagreed with the lost sales allegation, stating “***.”

*** named *** in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of ***

domestic wooden bedroom suites, at a total value of $***, because of competition with imported Chinese

furniture. ***.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

V-29

*** named *** in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in *** it lost sales to *** of ***

domestic wooden bedroom suites, at a total value of $***, because of competition with imported Chinese

furniture. *** disagreed with the lost sales allegation, stating that the product was “source from another

U.S. producing competitor.”

*** named *** in a lost sales allegation. *** asserted that in the *** it lost sales to *** of ***

domestic wooden bedroom suites, at a total value of $***, because of competition with imported Chinese

furniture. *** disagreed with the allegation, stating that ***.

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 An additional seven U.S. producers, ***, submitted questionnaire responses. However, their responses were not

used because they either contained no financial data or were significantly incomplete. Two producers, Modern and

Thornwood, have not provided responses in the final phase of the investigation, even though they submitted

responses in the preliminary phase of the investigation.

 2

 Firms reporting internal consumption were ***.

 3

 Firms reporting transfers to related firms were ***.

 4

 Also, Ethan Allen’s revised financial data as well as some other firms’ revised financial data were incorporated

into this report. Late revisions in financial data from *** were not incorporated into this report because they

reclassified the restructuring charges initially reported in all other expenses (internally booked below the operating

income line and included in all other expenses) to parts of cost of sales. The supplemental supporting documentation

requested by Commission staff did not fully and directly support their reclassification of these expenses to cost of

sales.

 5

 Selected per-unit sales, cost, and operating income (loss) data of the producers on their operations are not

presented in this section since value is a more reliable and accurate measure of U.S. operations than quantity

(quantities are generally not reported in the furniture industry given the variety of the products made in the sector

and that there is no uniform measure of quantity); moreover, wooden bedroom furniture is offered for sale in

coordinated groups called bedroom suites or bedroom collections and thus product mix may have a significant

impact on the average unit values. In this case, differences in product mix, especially the types of bedroom furniture

collections, play a major role in the fluctuations of per-unit sales value and cost, unlike industries in which

fluctuations in financial results reflect changes in the unit selling prices and costs for virtually the same products. 

Therefore, unit selling price and cost data are not presented in this section.

VI-1

PART VI: FINANCIAL CONDITION OF U.S. PRODUCERS

BACKGROUND

Forty-three U.S. producers accounting for at least 80 percent of domestically produced U.S.

shipments in 2003 provided usable financial data on their operations on wooden bedroom furniture during

the period examined.1

 Four producers also reported internal consumption2 and six producers reported

transfers to related firms.3

 However, combined internal consumption and related company transfers were

less than *** percent of the combined companies’ net sales quantity and value in all periods (except for

interim 2004 which was approximately *** percent) and thus are not presented separately.

The questionnaire data of Vaughan were verified with its company records at its corporate

facilities. The verification adjustments were incorporated into this report.4

 The financial data of Vaughan

were changed to ***. The adjustments for Vaughan resulted in ***.

OPERATIONS ON WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE

Results of operations of the U.S. producers on their U.S. wooden bedroom furniture

manufacturing operations are presented in table VI-1. Aggregate results of overall operations (including

importing) on their wooden bedroom furniture are shown in table VI-2.5

 Information on U.S. producers’

U.S. manufacturing operations and overall operations (including importing) is presented in figures VI-1

and VI-2. Figures VI-3 and VI-4 present information on U.S. producers importing operations.

Based on table VI-1, the quantity sold and the net sales value decreased in each year, contributing

to an annual decline in the operating income. Operating income decreased substantially by over $62

million between 2001 and 2003. Both sales volume and value decreased, as did operating income (by

$1.5 million) from interim 2003 to interim 2004.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-2

Table VI-1

Results of manufacturing operations of U.S. producers on wooden bedroom furniture, fiscal years 2001-

03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Fiscal year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Net sales1 13,903,209 13,475,643 12,522,006 6,614,185 6,274,110

Value ($1,000)

Net sales1 2,325,701 2,166,170 1,899,142 991,846 912,937

COGS 1,854,882 1,735,307 1,546,745 803,081 732,103

Gross profit 470,819 430,863 352,397 188,765 180,834

SG&A expenses 361,066 330,203 304,928 158,093 151,665

Operating income 109,753 100,660 47,469 30,672 29,169

Interest expense 14,043 9,250 7,054 4,117 2,993

Other expense 26,462 8,649 25,922 13,057 10,901

Other income 7,933 8,358 7,601 4,982 3,301

Net income 77,181 91,119 22,094 18,480 18,576

Depreciation/amortization 66,397 58,029 52,559 27,199 25,768

Cash flow 143,578 149,148 74,653 45,679 44,344

Ratio to net sales (percent)

COGS 79.8 80.1 81.4 81.0 80.2

Gross profit 20.2 19.9 18.6 19.0 19.8

SG&A expenses 15.5 15.2 16.1 15.9 16.6

Operating income 4.7 4.6 2.5 3.1 3.2

Number of firms reporting

Operating losses 12 16 23 23 20

Data 43 43 43 43 43

 1 Combined internal consumption and company transfers are less than *** percent of the combined companies’ net sales

quantity and value in all periods (except for interim 2004 which was approximately *** percent) and are not shown separately. 

 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-3

Table VI-2

Results of overall operations (including importing) of U.S. producers on wooden bedroom furniture, fiscal

years 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Fiscal year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Net sales1 15,611,222 15,887,396 15,422,554 7,971,632 7,857,228

Value ($1,000)

Net sales1 2,691,215 2,684,504 2,543,159 1,291,817 1,294,306

COGS 2,126,571 2,109,147 2,017,600 1,018,072 1,010,802

Gross profit 564,644 575,357 525,559 273,745 283,504

SG&A expenses 409,673 397,625 393,207 197,970 203,854

Operating income 154,971 177,732 132,352 75,775 79,650

Interest expense 16,230 11,483 9,576 5,416 4,442

Other expense 31,076 11,378 32,694 16,017 14,908

Other income 8,290 8,966 8,412 5,440 3,600

Net income 115,955 163,837 98,494 59,782 63,900

Depreciation/amortization 68,696 61,023 56,353 29,085 27,623

Cash flow 184,651 224,860 154,847 88,867 91,523

Ratio to net sales (percent)

COGS 79.0 78.6 79.3 78.8 78.1

Gross profit 21.0 21.4 20.7 21.2 21.9

SG&A expenses 15.2 14.8 15.5 15.3 15.8

Operating income 5.8 6.6 5.2 5.9 6.2

Number of firms reporting

Operating losses 9 10 19 18 17

Data 43 43 43 43 43

 1 Combined internal consumption and company transfers are less than *** percent of the combined companies’ net sales

quantity and value in all periods and are not shown separately. 

 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-4

Figure VI-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ net sales from U.S. manufacturing operations and overall

operations (including importing), 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Net sales ($1,000) 

 Net sales from U.S. manufacturing operations 

 Net sales from overall operations (including importing)

Source: Tables VI-1 and VI-2.

Figure VI-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ operating income from U.S. manufacturing operations and 

overall operations (including importing), and ratios to net sales, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and JanuaryJune 2004

5.8%

6.6%

5.2%

5.9% 6.2%

3.1% 3.2%

2.5%

4.7% 4.6%

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

160,000

180,000

200,000

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Operating income ($1,000) 

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%

Operating income as a ratio

to net sales (percent) 

 Operating income from U.S. manufacturing operations 

 Operating income from overall operations (including importing)

 Operating income from U.S. manufacturing operations as a ratio to net sales 

 Operating income from overall operations (including importing) as a ratio to net sales

Source: Tables VI-1 and VI-2.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-5

Figure VI-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ net sales and operating income from importing operations,

2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

518,334

299,971

381,369

644,017

365,514

45,103 50,481

77,072 84,883

45,218

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Net sales ($1,000) 

 Net sales from importing operations Operating income from importing operations

Source: Tables VI-1 and VI-2.

Figure VI-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ operating income from importing operations as a ratio to net

sales from importing operations, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

12.4%

13.2%

15.0%

13.2%

14.9%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

20.0%

2001 2002 2003 January-June

2003

January-June

2004

Operating income as a ratio to net sales (percent)

Source: Tables VI-1 and VI-2.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-6

The combined results of U.S. manufacturing operations of the U.S. producers on wooden

bedroom furniture remained profitable for the entire period examined. The percentage of operating

income to net sales (operating income margin) decreased continuously from 4.7 percent in 2001 to 2.5

percent in 2003. The operating income margin increased slightly from interim 2003 to interim 2004.

Aggregate results of overall operations, which also included importing activities, were somewhat

better than results of the U.S. manufacturing operations for all periods examined, as shown in table VI-2.

Selected data for reporting U.S. producers, grouped by net sales revenue, are presented in table

VI-3. The above-$100 million sales ranges had operating income and the under-$100 million ranges had

operating losses, except for the $30-50 million range which had a small operating income in 2003. 

Generally, operating margins were more favorable when sales ranges were higher, except in the case of

***.

Table VI-3

Selected data for reporting U.S. producers of wooden bedroom furniture, grouped by sales value, fiscal

year 2003 

Sales range

Number of

firms

Number of

firms with an

operating

loss Net sales 

Operating

income/(loss)

Operating

margin

$1,000 Percent

Over $200 million *** *** *** *** ***

$100-200 million *** *** *** *** *** 

$50-100 million 4 *** 281,807 (4,390) (1.6)

$30-50 million 7 3 263,604 1,374 0.5 

$10-30 million 19 12 374,480 (6,175) (1.6)

Under $10 million 8 5 41,228 (1,341) (3.3)

Total/average 43 23 1,899,142 47,469 2.5 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 6 ***.

 7

 ***.

 8

 Restructuring charges and impairment losses on long-lived assets to be held and used shall be reported as

components of income from continuing operations, according to GAAP (Statement of Financial Accounting

Standards (SFAS) No. 144, “Accounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets”), with appropriate

footnote disclosure. These charges and losses could have many components, such as severance-related costs and

write-down of certain fixed assets and inventories which are usually recorded in cost of sales and/or SG&A, or as

separate items above the operating income line. The results of operations of a component that has been disposed of

or is classified as held for sale may be reported in discontinued operations if the operations of the component have

been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal and the entity will have no

significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction (SFAS No. 144,

para. 42). Furthermore, SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities,” paragraph 

18, states that costs associated with an exit or disposal activity that does not involve a discontinued operation shall

be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes . . . . Costs associated with an exit or

disposal activity that involves a discontinued operation shall be included in the results of discontinued operations. 

Based on Form 10-Ks filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and/or audited financial

statements of La-Z-Boy (which owns American Drew, American of Martinsville, Lea Industries, Kincaid, and

Pennsylvania House), Ethan Allen, and Vaughan, restructuring and impairment charges as well as write-down of

intangibles for casegoods were recorded above the operating income line. ***.

VI-7

Table VI-4 presents selected financial data on a company-by-company basis for operating

income/(loss) and the ratio of operating income/(loss) to the net sales value of U.S. producers not

importing subject merchandise from China,6

 and table VI-5 presents the same financial information for

the U.S. manufacturing operations of U.S. producers importing subject merchandise from China.7 8

These data indicate that the domestic industry is dominated by ***. Together, these ***

producers accounted for approximately *** of total net sales values in every period and *** of the

aggregate operating income during the period examined.

A variance analysis is not presented in this case because the variances in sales revenues and total

costs were largely affected by product mix and because there are no reliable per-unit sales price and cost

and sales quantity data available; an analysis of unit financial data is also not presented.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-8

Table VI-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: Operating income or (loss) and operating income or (loss) margin to net sales of U.S. producers not

importing subject merchandise from China, by firms, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Firm

Fiscal year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value Percent Value Percent Value Percent Value Percent Value Percent

$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (19) 16,465 4.8 12,506 3.7 7,027 2.3 3,546 2.2 4,710 3.0

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-9

Table VI-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: Operating income or (loss) and operating income or (loss) margin to net sales of U.S. manufacturing

operations of U.S. producers importing subject merchandise from China, by firms, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June

2004

Firm

Fiscal year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value Percent Value Percent Value Percent Value Percent Value Percent

$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (24) 93,288 4.7 88,154 4.8 40,442 2.5 27,126 3.3 24,459 3.2

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-10

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND RESEARCH

AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES

The responding firms’ aggregate data on capital expenditures and research and development

(R&D) expenses are shown in table VI-6. Capital expenditures decreased continuously during the period

examined. R&D expenses increased slightly from 2001 to 2002 and decreased to below the 2001 level in

2003. Both capital expenditures and R&D expenses decreased from interim 2003 to interim 2004.

Table VI-6

Capital expenditures and R&D expenses by U.S. producers in their production of wooden bedroom

furniture, fiscal years 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Fiscal year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value ($1,000)

Capital expenditures1 57,355 38,540 30,382 16,327 11,512

R&D expenses2 11,039 11,181 10,591 5,677 5,515

 1 Forty-two companies reported capital expenditures. 

 2

 Twenty-one companies reported R&D expenses.

 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

ASSETS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT

U.S. producers were requested to provide data on their assets used in the production and sales of

wooden bedroom furniture during the period examined to assess their return on investments (ROI). 

Although ROI can be computed in different ways, a commonly used method is income earned during the

period divided by the total assets utilized for the operations. Therefore, staff calculated ROI as operating

income divided by total assets used in the production and sale of wooden bedroom furniture. Data on the

U.S. producers’ total assets and their ROI are presented in table VI-7.

While total assets utilized by the U.S. producers in their wooden bedroom furniture operations

decreased continuously between 2001 and 2003, due mainly to many plant closings/shutdowns, the U.S.

producers’ operating income also decreased considerably during the same period, and their ROI increased

from 6.1 percent in 2001 to 6.3 percent in 2002, and then decreased to 3.4 percent in 2003. 

In order to put the foregoing data into perspective, in table VI-8 the staff computed the ROI for

NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 337122 (nonupholstered wood household

furniture manufacturing), based upon data contained in the Risk Management Association’s (RMA’s)

Annual Statement Studies, Financial Ratio Benchmarks, 2003-04, which covers SIC (Standard Industrial

Classification) code 2511. Even though the RMA Financial Ratio Benchmarks for NAICS 337122 are

presented, it should be noted that exact comparisons between the questionnaire data and the RMA data

are not advised for several reasons. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-11

Table VI-7

Value of assets and return on investment of U.S. producers in their production of wooden bedroom

furniture, fiscal years 2001-03

Item

Fiscal year

2001 2002 2003

Value ($1,000)

Value of assets–

1. Current assets:

A. Cash and equivalents 121,322 70,651 71,892

B. Trade receivables (net) 384,345 346,321 287,819

C. Inventory 471,063 477,075 427,512

D. All other current 31,745 24,878 27,596

Total current 1,008,475 918,925 814,819

2. Non-current assets:

A. Productive facilities (original cost) 1,352,906 1,265,271 1,191,682

B. Productive facilities (net book value) 609,203 534,243 472,244

C. Other non-current 173,322 133,595 92,494

Total non-current 782,525 667,838 564,738

Total assets 1,791,000 1,586,763 1,379,557

 Value ($1,000)

Operating income 109,753 100,660 47,469

Ratio of operating income to total assets (percent)

Return on investment 6.1 6.3 3.4

Note: ROIs for interim periods are not presented in this table because they only reflect the results of operations for a six-month

interim period while the ROIs for the full-year periods reflect the results of operations for a full 12-month period. The operations

results (numerator) are accumulated over a period of time while total assets (denominator) are static representation looking only

at a single point in time (i.e., at the end of the specific period). Therefore, it is not reasonable to compare the interim ROIs to the

ROIs for the full-year period. It is also not recommended to annualize interim period ROIs because interim operations results

would not accurately forecast results for a full year. It is also not advised to compare interim ROIs to the operating income

margins for interim periods.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VI-12

Table VI-8

The Risk Management Association data on the number of firms and their sales, operating margins, total

assets, and return on investment on their operations for NAICS 337122 (SIC code 2511) (nonupholstered

wood household furniture manufacturing), for the five one-year periods ending March 31, 2003

Item

One-year periods ending on March 31

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Value ($1,000)

Number of companies 166 113 107 126 159

Sales value $5,424,644 $3,779,213 $3,657,140 $4,312,938 $4,800,123

Asset value 3,060,320 2,136,237 2,129,487 2,256,741 2,468,152

Operating margin (percent) 4.6 5.8 4.7 3.0 3.0

Ratio of operating income (loss) to assets (percent)

Return on investment1 8.2 10.3 8.1 5.7 5.8

 1 Calculated based on sales value, asset value, and operating margin above. 

Source: Annual Statement Studies: Financial Ratio Benchmarks, 2003-2004 by the Risk Management Association (RMA). 

Permission to use the data granted by RMA.© “2004” by RMA–The Risk Management Association. All rights reserved. No part

of this table may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,

recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from RMA–The Risk Management

Association. Please refer to www.rmahq.org for further warranty, copyright and use of data information.

While the questionnaire data strictly relate to wooden bedroom furniture, the RMA data include

data on other products and may or may not actually reflect financial ratios for wooden bedroom furniture. 

Further, while the questionnaire data for three calendar years (2001 to 2003) consist of the data from only

43 firms with an aggregate sales value of $1.9 billion in 2003, the RMA data for the 12-month period

ending March 31, 2003, are for 159 companies with an aggregate sales value over $4.8 billion. This

means that the questionnaire data represent less than 40 percent of the RMA data. Finally, it is not known

whether any of the 43 domestic producers of wooden bedroom furniture provided data to RMA. 

Therefore, it may not be meaningful to compare the historical RMA data with the questionnaire data.

CAPITAL AND INVESTMENT

The Commission requested U.S. producers to describe any actual or potential negative effects of

imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China on their firms’ growth, investment, ability to raise

capital, existing development and production efforts (including efforts to develop a derivative or more

advanced version of the product), or the scale of capital investments. Their responses are shown in

appendix I.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 See 19 U.S.C. § 1677(7)(F)(i).

 2

 The data exclude those of the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

 3

 Coverage was calculated using the Commission’s quantity of beds exported to the United States reported by

Chinese producers in 2003 (1.959 million) and the quantity of beds imported from China in 2003 (3.137 million)

from official import statistics.

 4

 The petition identified 133 Chinese foreign producers/exporters of wooden bedroom furniture. See petition at

exh. 6. The Commission sent faxes to all such firms that had fax numbers. The Commission also e-mailed the

foreign producer questionnaire to counsel representing Chinese wooden bedroom producers/exporters identified on

the Commission’s and Commerce’s public service lists. The Commission also posted the foreign producer

questionnaire on its web site and distributed it to parties representing U.S. retailers and importers of the subject

merchandise.

VII-1

PART VII: THREAT CONSIDERATIONS

The Commission analyzes a number of factors in making threat determinations.1 Information on

the volume and pricing of imports of the subject merchandise is presented in Parts IV and V, and

information on the asserted effects of imports of the subject merchandise on U.S. producers’ existing

development and production efforts is presented in appendix I. Information on inventories of the subject

merchandise; foreign producers’ operations, including the potential for “product-shifting;” any other

threat indicators, if applicable; and any dumping in third-country markets, follows.

THE INDUSTRY IN CHINA

Information on Chinese producers’ production capacity, production, shipments, and inventories is

presented in tables VII-1 and VII-2 and figure VII-1.2

 Data on Chinese exports by selected pieces of

wooden bedroom furniture are presented in table VII-3. The Chinese industry data are based on the

responses of 153 firms estimated to account for approximately 62 percent of Chinese exports3

 of the

subject merchandise to the United States in 2003.4

 The reported data show increases in each year and

period (including projections) for each of the indicators (capacity, production, shipments, and inventories)

on which data were collected. Information on reporting producers of wooden bedroom furniture in China,

their largest U.S. customers in 2003, their exports and export shares to the United States in 2003, and

their final dumping margins, is presented in appendix G (table G-1).
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-2

Table VII-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: Data on the industry in China, based on pieces, 2001-03, January-June 2003, January-June 2004,

and projections for 2004-051

Item

Actual experience Projections2

Calendar year January-June Calendar year

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005

Quantity (pieces)

Capacity 4,591,982 7,029,420 9,772,358 *** *** *** ***

Production 3,721,032 6,434,655 8,636,196 *** *** *** ***

End-of-period inventories 191,226 344,010 459,951 *** *** *** ***

Shipments:

Internal consumption/transfers 45,435 53,047 67,459 *** *** *** ***

Home market 541,513 631,616 1,053,985 *** *** *** ***

Exports to:

United States3 2,872,363 5,290,863 7,095,949 *** *** *** ***

All other markets4 436,778 698,131 952,782 *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, exports 3,309,141 5,988,994 8,048,731 *** *** *** ***

Total shipments 3,896,089 6,673,657 9,170,175 *** *** *** ***

Ratios and shares based on quantity (percent)5

Capacity utilization 80.8 90.9 87.6 *** *** *** ***

Inventories/production 5.1 5.3 5.3 *** *** *** ***

Inventories/shipments 4.9 5.2 5.0 *** *** *** ***

Share of total shipments:

Internal consumption/transfers 1.2 0.8 0.7 *** *** *** ***

Home market 13.9 9.5 11.5 *** *** *** ***

Exports to:

United States 73.7 79.3 77.4 *** *** *** ***

All other markets4 11.2 10.5 10.4 *** *** *** ***

Total, exports 84.9 89.7 87.8 *** *** *** ***

1

 Data exclude those of the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin. One large producer, ***, did not provide data for both interim periods

or for the projected periods. ***. 2

 Not all producers in China provided projections for 2004 and 2005. 3

 Totals for exports to the United States of pieces do not match those in table VII-3 because of differences in the number of responding

firms and/or because of other reporting anomalies. 4

 “All other markets” consists of Australia, Canada, EU, Japan, and the Middle East.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown. Ratios are calculated using data of only those firms providing both

numerator and denominator information. Partial-year ratios are calculated from annualized production or shipment data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-3

Table VII-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Data on the industry in China, based on pounds, 2001-03, January-June 2003, January-June 2004, and

projections for 2004-051

Item

Actual experience Projections2

Calendar year January-June Calendar year

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005

Quantity (pounds)

Capacity 443,240,840 704,087,583 836,593,428 *** *** *** ***

Production 307,525,691 585,553,773 773,826,604 *** *** *** ***

End-of-period inventories 15,354,436 30,779,086 42,600,617 *** *** *** ***

Shipments:

Internal consumption/transfers 416,508 598,214 919,771 *** *** *** ***

Home market 31,424,310 40,670,258 67,780,518 *** *** *** ***

Exports to:

United States 253,031,705 493,384,677 640,587,486 *** *** *** ***

All other markets3 33,386,249 57,022,538 69,504,320 *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, exports 286,417,954 550,407,215 710,091,806 *** *** *** ***

Total shipments 318,258,772 591,675,687 778,792,095 *** *** *** ***

Ratios and shares based on quantity (percent)4

Capacity utilization 68.0 79.4 87.9 *** *** *** ***

Inventories/production 5.0 5.3 5.5 *** *** *** ***

Inventories/shipments 4.8 5.2 5.5 *** *** *** ***

Share of total shipments:

Internal consumption/transfers 0.1 0.1 0.1 *** *** *** ***

Home market 9.9 6.9 8.7 *** *** *** ***

Exports to:

United States 79.5 83.4 82.3 *** *** *** ***

All other markets3 10.5 9.6 8.9 *** *** *** ***

Total, exports 90.0 93.0 91.2 *** *** *** ***

1

 Data exclude those of the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin. One large producer, ***, did not provide data for both interim periods or for

the projected periods. ***. 2

 Not all producers in China provided projections for 2004 and 2005. 3

 “All other markets” consists of Australia, Canada, EU, Japan, and the Middle East.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown. Ratios are calculated using data of only those firms providing both

numerator and denominator information. Partial-year ratios are calculated from annualized production or shipment data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-4

Figure VII-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: China’s reported capacity, production, and capacity utilization, based on

pieces, 2001-03, and projected 2004-051

87.6%

80.8%

90.9%

0

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

2001 2002 2003

Quantity (pieces) 

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

Capacity utilization (percent) 

Capacity Production Capacity Utilization

1

 Data for projected periods 2004-05 not shown.

Source: Table VII-1.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 5 “Furniture Export Set to Soar,” China.org.cn, located at http://www.china.org.cn/english/BAT/55432.htm

(accessed August 27, 2003) (quoting China Daily article of February 10, 2003); Jeff Xiaozhi Cao, Eric Hansen, and

Meiqi Xu, “China’s Furniture Industry,” June 2003, located at http://www.ahc.caf.wvu.edu/Fact_Sheet/China/

pr-030630%20-%20China%20Furnit.%20Ind.pdf (accessed October 10, 2003) (citing a 2001 CSIL report).

 6

 “Q: Furniture Manufacturers in China,” Google Answers, located at http://answers.google.com/answers/

main?cmd=threadview&id=244071 (accessed August 27, 2003) (quoting a China Green Times article on May 21,

2003).

 7

 Cao, Hansen, and Xu, “China’s Furniture Industry.”

 8

 International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO), “Tropical Timber Market Report,” September 16-20, 2002,

located at http://www.itto.or.jp/market/archives_2002/downloads/sep16_2002.doc (accessed September 29, 2003).

 9

 “Research Report on Furniture Industry & Market of China: 2001 Edition,” All China Business Information,

located at http://www.acmr.com.cn/english/Industry%20Reports/brev23.htm (accessed September 29, 2003).

 10 “Jack Chen, the CAPFA Man in Charge,” February 2003, located at http://www.cens.com/cens/report/

furniture/capfa.html (accessed August 18, 2003).

 11 “Research Report on Furniture Industry & Market of China: 2001 Edition.”

VII-5

Table VII-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Chinese producers’ exports to the United States, by selected pieces, 2001-03,

January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

*******

Most of the public-source information acquired by Commission staff about the Chinese furniture

industry encompasses all types of furniture and is not specific to the wooden bedroom furniture industry. 

All references to the Chinese furniture industry are made regarding the furniture industry as a whole,

unless otherwise noted.

Furniture production in China has grown significantly since the introduction of market reforms in

1979. Data indicate that China recently was the second-largest global producer of furniture, behind the

United States. According to the China National Furniture Association (CNFA), China produced $20

billion worth of furniture in 2002,5

 accounting for 10 percent of global furniture production.6 By

comparison, just a few years earlier, China was tied with Germany and Japan as the third-largest furniture

producer, each with 8 percent, behind the United States with 25 percent and Italy with 9 percent.7

 CNFA

estimates that China’s furniture production can reach about $21 billion by 2005 and approximately $36

billion by 2015, averaging an annual growth rate of 12 to 15 percent.8

Sources reveal a myriad of employment figures for China’s furniture sector and reflect the

differences between the comparatively few large furniture producers and the great number of small-scale

furniture workshops with “distinctive regional characteristics.”9

 The Council of Asia-Pacific Furniture

Associations estimated in February 2003 that China possessed 50,000 furniture makers employing more

than 5 million workers,10 which is almost identical to figures found for 2000.11 Another source, however,
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 12 “Research Report of Chinese Furniture Industry,” China-ASEAN Business Net, June 2000, located at

http://www.china-asean.net/china_biz/marketing_report/china_report_furniture.html (accessed August 18, 2003).

 13 “Competitive Situation,” Industry Canada, December 7, 1998, located at http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/ssg/

dd74251e.html (accessed August 18, 2003) (quoting STAT-USA material). Part of the discrepancy may be

attributed to characterizations about the composition of the Chinese furniture industry. According to CNFA, of the

30,000 furniture manufacturers in China in 1998, approximately 80 percent were small- and medium-sized privately

owned or state-owned enterprises, leaving 6,000 “large” furniture manufacturers. By comparison, another source

stated that in mid-2003, after excluding small-scale furniture workshops, China’s furniture industry had about 5,000

furniture manufacturers, but still more than 5.5 million workers. “Traditional Executive and Task Chairs Updated,”

Global Sources Hardwares, June 3, 2003, located at http://www.giftsandhome.globalsources.com/am/

article_id/9000000041402/page/showarticle?action=GetArticle (accessed August 18, 2003).

 14 Cao, Hansen, and Xu, “China’s Furniture Industry.” One source indicates that Shanghai accounts for 35

percent of total Chinese furniture production. “Q: Furniture Manufacturers in China.”

 15 “Furniture Makers Prepare for Possible U.S. Anti-dumping Investigation,” China.org.cn, located at

http://www.china.org.cn/english/MATERIAL/70995.htm (accessed August 18, 2003) (quoting a China Daily article

of July 28, 2003).

 16 Ibid.

 17 June Fletcher, Peter Wonacott, and Karen Mazurkewich, “Made in China—and Staying?” Wall Street Journal,

April 18, 2003, p. A14.

 18 “Anti-dumping Investigation of Certain Folding Tables and Chairs,” American consulate in Hong Kong,

004218, May 25, 2001.

 19 “Furniture Makers Prepare for Possible U.S. Anti-dumping Investigation,” op. cit.

 20 “Research Report of Chinese Furniture Industry.” In 1997, the production quantity of lumber furniture

accounted for 65 percent of the total production. Ibid. In 1998, the percentage increased to 70 percent. “China

Market Ascending,” Tropical Forest Update vol. 10, no. 1 (2000/2001), located at http://www.itto.or.jp/

newsletter/v10n1/8.html (accessed August 18, 2003).

 21 Economist Intelligence Unit, “Boost in Wood Imports Helps Fuel Competition,” EIU Viewswire, August 19,

2003, located at http://www.viewswire.com (accessed November 5, 2003).

VII-6

states that in mid-2000 there were more than 30,000 furniture enterprises in China, employing more than

2 million workers,12 which is itself identical to figures given by CNFA for 1998.13

Furniture is manufactured in every coastal Chinese province, but three provinces accounted for

approximately 70 percent of China’s furniture manufacturing in 2002: Guangdong Province, 30 percent;

Fujian Province, 22 percent; and Zhejiang Province, 18 percent.14 Guangdong Province, Beijing, and

Shanghai are the major furniture production bases in China.15

Guangdong Province accounted for 51 percent of the nation’s furniture exports in 200216 and $2.7

billion worth of furniture sold in the United States.17 Proximity to Hong Kong appears to be a factor in

the province’s favor, as 90 percent of Hong Kong’s furniture manufacturers have moved their production

base to southern China to take advantage of lower operating costs while using advanced machinery to

enhance efficiency and product quality.18 Reportedly, as of mid-2003 almost all the furniture

manufacturers in the province were privately owned or have foreign investors.19

Data indicate that the raw materials used for furniture production in China are mainly lumber.20 

China is a net importer of timber and by one estimate was the world’s largest timber importer.21 Russian

East Asia and Siberia were among China’s major timber suppliers, as geographical proximity encouraged
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 22 BROC, Friends of Siberian Forests, and Forests Monitor Ltd., The Wild East: Tree in Transit, October 2001,

pt. 2, located at http://www.forest.ru/eng/publications/wildeast/02.htm (accessed August 18, 2003).

 23 Ibid.

 24 “Research Report of Chinese Furniture Industry,” and “China Market Ascending,” op. cit.

 25 “Research Report on Furniture Industry & Market of China: 2001 Edition.” See “Research Report of Chinese

Furniture Industry.” Large-scale enterprises reportedly enjoyed a comparatively good reputation regarding the

quality of their furniture products. “Research Report on Furniture Industry & Market of China: 2001 Edition.”

 26 Fletcher, Wonacott, and Mazurkewich, “Made in China–and Staying?”

 27 See testimony of Irwin Allen, President, Michels-Pilliod Co., hearing transcript at 30; testimony of John E.

Wentworth, President, Moosehead Manufacturing Co., hearing transcript at 33; testimony of Wyatt Bassett,

Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Co., hearing transcript at 39, 80, and 177; testimony of Ken

Loring, President, Boston Interiors, hearing transcript at 58; and testimony of Craig Spooner, Chief Financial

Officer, Lexington Furniture Co., hearing transcript at 206.

 28 Furniture parts are classified under HTS subheadings 9401.90 and 9403.90. In 2002, China’s furniture parts

exports totaled $400 million.

 29 Wood furniture is classified under HTS subheadings 9401.61, 9401.69, 9403.30, 9403.40, 9403.50, and

9403.60.

 30 Nonwooden furniture is classified under HTS subheadings 9401.30, 9401.40, 9401.50, 9401.71, 9401.79,

9401.80, 9402.10, 9402.90, 9403.10, 9403.20, 9403.70, and 9403.80.

 31 “Furniture Export Set to Soar,” op. cit.

VII-7

trade.22 Tariff and tax policies favorable to importers on the Chinese side have also helped increase trade

in timber.23

The growing Chinese domestic market for furniture results in some competition for China’s

export markets, as China’s domestic demand for furniture was expected to increase by 10 percent

annually from 2000 to 2010, primarily because of the rapid development of the building sector and the

projected increase in per-capita housing.24

Quality control had historically been the largest issue facing the Chinese furniture industry. A

2001 survey by the National Bureau of Quality Control and Quarantine indicated that one-third of

Chinese wood furniture manufactured had quality problems.25 In 2003, the number of U.S. complaints

about damaged Chinese furniture increased because of production defects and damage accumulated

during transit.26 During the hearing, however, most of the testimony indicated that Chinese wooden

bedroom furniture imports were of equal or higher quality than U.S.-manufactured furniture.27

According to Chinese customs data, China exported $5.4 billion worth of furniture and furniture

parts28 in 2002, an increase of 35 percent over the 2001 total of $4.0 billion. The largest portion of that

increase resulted from exports of wooden furniture29 ($2.7 billion in 2002, an increase of 46 percent over

the 2001 amount of $1.9 billion). By comparison, China exported $2.3 billion worth of nonwooden

furniture30 in 2002, an increase of 24 percent over the 2001 total of $1.8 billion. Since 1998, China’s

exports of all furniture, as well as of wooden and nonwooden furniture individually, have increased at an

annual rate of 25 percent.

CNFA had predicted that Chinese furniture exports would increase by 30 percent in 2003,31

resulting in an estimated $7.0 billion in exports, and would continue to increase by 20 percent annually
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 32 CNFA, “Traditional Executive and Task Chairs Updated.”

 33 Ibid.

 34 “2002 U.S./China Trade in Agricultural, Forestry and Aquatic Products,” American Embassy in Beijing,

002644, March 10, 2003.

 35 “Furniture Export Set to Soar,” op. cit.

VII-8

until 2015.32 Chinese exports by value for the first half of 2003 amounted to $3.7 billion, an increase of

35 percent from the first half of 2002.33

The United States is by far the most important export market for Chinese furniture

manufacturers–four times larger than the number two market, Hong Kong. According to 2002 Chinese

customs figures, China exported $2.8 billion worth of furniture to the United States, accounting for 53

percent of China’s total furniture exports (an increase from 48 percent in 1998), comprised of $1.4 billion

in wooden furniture, $1.2 billion in nonwooden furniture, and $0.2 billion in furniture parts. By

comparison, Chinese furniture exports to Hong Kong in 2002 totaled $0.7 billion; to Japan, $0.5 billion;

and to the United Kingdom, $0.2 billion.

China has also become more dependent on the U.S. furniture market for its exports. From 1998

to 2002, Chinese furniture exports to the United States, as a share of all Chinese furniture exports, rose

from 41 percent to 51 percent for wooden furniture; declined slightly from 57 percent to 55 percent for

nonwooden furniture; and rose from 34 percent to 48 percent for furniture parts. As of early 2003, the

“lion’s share” of U.S. furniture imports from China continued to be products for which many of the inputs

were exported to China from the United States and other countries and processed there using low-cost

Chinese labor.34

The value of China’s furniture imports was just more than $100 million in 2002, despite some

predictions that imports would soar after China’s WTO entry. Under China’s WTO commitments, import

tariffs on furniture dropped from 22 percent to 11 percent in 2002. Tariffs were scheduled to drop to 7.5

percent in 2003 and be eliminated by 2005.35

U.S. IMPORTERS’ INVENTORIES

Tables VII-4 through VII-6 present data on U.S. importers’ end-of-period inventories of imported

wooden bedroom furniture. 

U.S. IMPORTERS’ CURRENT ORDERS

Ninety-nine U.S. importers indicated that they have imported or arranged for the importation of

wooden bedroom furniture since June 30, 2004. Table VII-7 presents U.S. importers’ imports and orders

for wooden bedroom furniture from China, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Vietnam, and all other

sources between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2004.

ANTIDUMPING DUTY ORDERS IN THIRD-COUNTRY MARKETS

There are currently no known antidumping duty orders on wooden bedroom furniture from

China.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-9

Table VII-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ end-of-period inventories of imports, 2001-03, January-June

2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

Imports from China2 523,580 1,229,623 1,462,790 1,302,733 1,642,705

Imports from all other sources 473,441 740,787 835,146 820,476 945,029

Total imports 997,021 1,970,410 2,297,936 2,123,209 2,587,734

Quantity (pounds)

Imports from China2 38,652,010 83,309,239 109,576,185 102,436,647 130,078,887

Imports from all other sources 28,710,476 39,478,305 49,122,152 45,627,372 52,336,050

Total imports 67,362,486 122,787,544 158,698,337 148,064,019 182,414,937

Ratio of inventories to imports (percent, pieces)

Imports from China2 15.7 20.2 19.7 17.8 18.8

Imports from all other sources 11.8 16.3 15.2 15.7 15.5

Total imports 13.6 18.6 17.8 17.0 17.4

Ratio of inventories to imports (percent, pounds)

Imports from China2 18.0 18.9 20.3 20.2 19.4

Imports from all other sources 11.5 12.1 12.4 12.3 11.9

Total imports 14.5 16.0 16.9 16.9 16.4

Ratio of inventories to U.S. shipments of imports (percent, pieces)

Imports from China2 16.7 24.5 23.5 21.8 22.0

Imports from all other sources 13.8 19.9 17.9 18.6 18.4

Total imports 15.2 22.5 21.1 20.4 20.5

Ratio of inventories to U.S. shipments of imports (percent, pounds)

Imports from China2 18.7 22.3 23.0 23.4 22.2

Imports from all other sources 13.8 14.9 14.8 14.6 13.7

Total imports 16.2 19.2 19.6 19.7 18.8

1

 Data for the value of inventories were not collected.

2

 May include imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

Note: Import data presented in this table are based on responses to questionnaires of the Commission. Ratios are calculated

using data from firms that provided both numerator and denominator information. Partial-year ratios are calculated using

annualized import and shipment data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-10

Table VII-5

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ end-of-period inventories of imports (based on pieces), by

sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

End-of-period inventories (pieces)

Imports from:

China1 523,580 1,229,623 1,462,790 1,302,733 1,642,705

Brazil 100,902 142,139 167,289 140,592 203,251

Indonesia 38,579 76,917 83,485 86,480 92,777

Malaysia 135,294 184,841 236,989 229,866 214,942

Mexico 47,658 73,282 57,565 68,083 58,639

Vietnam 0 12,196 45,333 32,959 118,488

All other sources 151,008 251,412 244,485 262,496 256,932

Total 997,021 1,970,410 2,297,936 2,123,209 2,587,734

Ratio of inventories to U.S. imports (percent/pieces)

Imports from:

China1 15.7 20.2 19.7 17.8 18.8

Brazil 23.0 25.2 25.2 26.5 28.6

Indonesia 9.6 15.2 16.8 18.0 17.1

Malaysia 32.6 31.0 30.1 32.1 27.9

Mexico 5.4 8.9 8.9 9.6 10.7

Vietnam (2

) 21.5 16.2 14.3 21.6

All other sources 8.1 12.6 9.3 10.3 8.6

Average 13.6 18.6 17.8 17.0 17.4

Ratio of inventories to U.S. shipments of imports (percent/pieces)

Imports from:

China1 16.7 24.5 23.5 21.8 22.0

Brazil 31.7 35.1 35.8 31.9 46.2

Indonesia 11.4 19.5 20.6 22.6 21.0

Malaysia 42.9 38.2 37.6 41.6 31.3

Mexico 6.5 11.4 11.7 12.1 15.4

Vietnam (2

) 30.6 22.0 22.4 31.4

All other sources 8.8 14.3 9.9 11.3 9.2

Average 15.2 22.5 21.1 20.4 20.5

1

 May include imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin. 2

 Not applicable.

Note: Import data presented in this table are based on responses to questionnaires of the Commission. Ratios are calculated

using data from firms that provided both numerator and denominator information. Partial-year ratios are calculated using

annualized import and shipment data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-11

Table VII-6

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ end-of-period inventories of imports (based on pounds), by

sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

End-of-period inventories (pounds)

Imports from:

China1 38,652,010 83,309,239 109,576,185 102,436,647 130,078,887

Brazil 9,804,585 11,931,558 14,422,477 12,428,385 14,741,698

Indonesia 3,018,794 4,443,830 6,315,278 4,689,577 6,865,749

Malaysia 10,866,153 13,620,818 16,273,301 16,349,871 15,209,567

Mexico 649,326 634,205 184,329 323,559 218,815

Vietnam 0 1,086,902 2,820,474 2,419,755 4,766,246

All other sources 4,371,618 7,760,992 9,106,293 9,416,225 10,533,975

Total 67,362,486 122,787,544 158,698,337 148,064,019 182,414,937

Ratio of inventories to U.S. imports (percent/pounds)

Imports from:

China1 18.0 18.9 20.3 20.2 19.4

Brazil 27.4 28.6 30.6 33.8 33.3

Indonesia 11.2 12.5 15.9 13.7 15.8

Malaysia 36.4 27.5 26.1 27.6 26.9

Mexico 1.7 1.6 0.6 1.0 0.8

Vietnam (2

) 23.0 14.8 16.4 17.5

All other sources 3.6 5.0 4.6 4.8 4.3

Average 14.5 16.0 16.9 16.9 16.4

Ratio of inventories to U.S. shipments of imports (percent/pounds)

Imports from:

China1 18.7 22.3 23.0 23.4 22.2

Brazil 36.1 37.8 41.9 37.9 46.6

Indonesia 13.7 16.1 19.6 16.5 18.3

Malaysia 49.3 33.5 32.7 34.8 31.5

Mexico 3.2 3.1 1.2 2.1 1.8

Vietnam (2

) 35.8 20.3 28.0 24.0

All other sources 3.7 5.5 4.9 5.2 4.5

Average 16.2 19.2 19.6 19.7 18.8

1

 May include imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin. 2

 Not applicable.

Note: Import data presented in this table are based on responses to questionnaires of the Commission. Ratios are calculated

using data from firms that provided both numerator and denominator information. Partial-year ratios are calculated using

annualized import and shipment data.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

VII-12

Table VII-7

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers’ imports and orders, by import sources and by months, July-December 20041

Item

Calendar year 2004

July August September October November December Total

Quantity (pieces)

China2 467,227 588,987 809,665 610,636 468,581 330,697 3,275,793

Brazil 74,125 108,944 91,549 46,793 29,036 12,256 362,703

Indonesia 52,333 60,628 73,696 91,317 59,070 45,419 382,463

Malaysia 90,279 120,453 163,242 163,727 132,956 80,641 751,298

Mexico 49,629 55,415 70,215 53,741 39,579 20,520 289,099

Vietnam 65,518 88,754 124,137 189,479 167,545 91,361 726,794

All other sources 406,004 298,304 243,281 238,680 165,529 138,944 1,490,742

Total 1,205,115 1,321,485 1,575,785 1,394,373 1,062,296 719,838 7,278,892

Quantity (pounds)

China2 30,992,349 37,109,656 53,127,941 36,919,125 29,136,977 16,319,593 203,605,641

Brazil 4,822,559 7,263,815 6,681,997 2,150,515 1,142,789 425,310 22,486,985

Indonesia 4,703,786 5,408,830 7,277,366 8,265,483 4,455,960 2,395,718 32,507,143

Malaysia 7,860,010 10,282,978 13,545,711 13,793,943 10,469,362 6,177,947 62,129,951

Mexico 2,869,628 3,220,653 3,757,998 3,556,709 3,248,253 1,614,779 18,268,020

Vietnam 2,781,966 4,452,321 7,924,506 9,601,773 6,912,837 4,347,942 36,021,346

All other sources 31,835,831 22,466,247 20,037,766 18,973,139 12,053,303 10,476,228 115,842,514

Total 85,866,129 90,204,500 112,353,286 93,260,687 67,419,481 41,757,517 490,861,600

Value ($1,000)

China2 84,704 88,508 107,000 90,983 64,961 38,532 474,688

Brazil 7,350 9,796 10,123 4,962 2,698 1,152 36,081

Indonesia 9,172 10,387 11,937 15,411 9,247 4,696 60,849

Malaysia 9,023 12,348 16,352 18,219 14,712 9,460 80,114

Mexico 5,489 5,960 7,136 5,813 5,078 2,453 31,930

Vietnam 10,222 13,533 17,053 25,605 22,600 18,974 107,987

All other sources 23,134 19,336 16,908 17,227 13,270 9,396 99,270

Total 149,094 159,868 186,509 178,221 132,565 84,662 890,918

1

 Eight-nine firms indicated shipments or orders of imports from China; 25 firms indicated shipments or orders of imports from Brazil,

29 firms indicated shipments or orders of imports from Indonesia, 33 firms indicated shipments or orders of imports from Malaysia; 13

firms indicated shipments or orders of imports from Mexico; 33 firms indicated shipments or orders of imports from Vietnam; and 39 firms

indicated shipments or orders of imports from all other sources. A number of firms indicated shipments of orders of imports from more

than one source. 2

 May include imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

A-1

APPENDIX A

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES

42452 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Notices 

1For purposes of this investigation, the 

Department of Commerce has defined the subject 

merchandise as wooden bedroom furniture. 

Wooden bedroom furniture is generally, but not 

exclusively, designed, manufactured, and offered 

for sale in coordinated groups, or bedrooms, in 

which all of the individual pieces are of 

approximately the same style and approximately 

the same material and/or finish. The subject 

merchandise is made substantially of wood 

products, including both solid wood and also 

engineered wood products made from wood 

particles, fibers, or other wooden materials such as 

plywood, oriented strand board, particle board, and 

fiberboard, with or without wood veneers, wood 

overlays, or laminates, with or without non-wood 

components or trim such as metal, marble, leather, 

glass, plastic, or other resins, and whether or not 

assembled, completed, or finished. The subject 

merchandise includes: (1) Wooden beds such as loft 

beds, bunk beds, and other beds; (2) wooden 

headboards for beds (whether stand alone or 

attached to side rails), wooden footboards for beds, 

wooden side rails for beds, and wooden canopies 

for beds; (3) night tables, night stands, dressers, 

commodes, bureaus, mule chests, gentlemen’s 

chests, bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, wardrobes, 

vanities, chessers, chifforobes, and wardrobe type 

cabinets; (4) dressers with framed glass mirrors that 

are attached to, incorporated in, sit on, or hang over 

the dresser; (5) chests-on-chests, highboys, lowboys, 

chests of drawers, chests, door chests, chiffoniers, 

hutches, and armoires; (6) desks, computer stands, 

filing cabinets, bookcases, or writing tables that are 

attached to or incorporated in the subject 

merchandise; and (7) other bedroom furniture 

consistent with the above list. 

The scope of the petition excludes: (1) Seats, 

chairs, benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, stools, 

and other seating furniture; (2) mattresses, mattress 

supports (including box springs), infant cribs, water 

beds, and futon frames; (3) office furniture, such as 

desks, stand-up desks, computer cabinets, filing 

cabinets, credenzas, and bookcases; (4) dining room 

or kitchen furniture such as dining tables, chairs, 

servers, sideboards, buffets, corner cabinets, china 

cabinets, and china hutches; (5) other non-bedroom 

furniture, such as television cabinets, cocktail 

tables, end tables, occasional tables, wall systems, 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1058 (Final)] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From 

China

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission.

ACTION: Scheduling of the final phase of 

an antidumping investigation. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of the final 

phase of antidumping investigation No. 

731–TA–1058 (Final) under section 

735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act) to determine 

whether an industry in the United 

States is materially injured or 

threatened with material injury, or the 

establishment of an industry in the 

United States is materially retarded, by 

reason of less-than-fair-value imports 

from China of wooden bedroom 

furniture, provided for in subheading 

9403.50.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTS).1

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Notices 42453

book cases, and entertainment systems; (6) bedroom 

furniture made primarily of wicker, cane, osier, 

bamboo or rattan; (7) side rails for beds made of 

metal if sold separately from the headboard and 

footboard; and (8) bedroom furniture in which 

bentwood parts predominate. 

Imports of subject merchandise are classified 

under statistical category 9403.50.9040 of the HTS 

as ‘‘wooden * * * beds’’ and under statistical 

category 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as ‘‘other 

* * * wooden furniture of a kind used in the 

bedroom.’’ In addition, wooden headboards for 

beds, wooden foot boards for beds, wooden side 

rails for beds, and wooden canopies for beds may 

also be entered under statistical category 

9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as ‘‘parts of wood’’’ and 

framed glass mirrors may also be entered under 

statistical category 7009.92.5000 of the HTSUS as 

‘‘’glass mirrors * * * framed.’’ This investigation 

covers all wooden bedroom furniture meeting the 

above description, regardless of tariff classification.

2 69 FR 35312, June 24, 2004.

For further information concerning 

the conduct of this phase of the 

investigation, hearing procedures, and 

rules of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 24, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Fischer (202) 205–3179 or 

fred.fischer@usitc.gov), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—The final phase of this 

investigation is being scheduled as a 

result of an affirmative preliminary 

determination by the Department of 

Commerce that imports of wooden 

bedroom furniture from China are being 

sold in the United States at less than fair 

value 2 within the meaning of section 

733 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b). The 

investigation was requested in a petition 

filed on October 31, 2004, by the 

American Furniture Manufacturers 

Committee for Legal Trade, Washington, 

DC, and its individual members; Cabinet 

Makers, Millmen, and Industrial 

Carpenters Local 721, Whittier, CA; 

UBC Southern Council of Industrial 

Workers Local Union 2305, Columbus, 

MS; United Steel Workers of America 

Local 193U, Lewisburg, PA; Carpenters 

Industrial Union Local 2093, Phoenix, 

AZ; and Teamsters, Chauffeurs, 

Warehousemen and Helpers Local 991, 

Bay Minette, AL.

Participation in the investigation and 

public service list.—Persons, including 

industrial users of the subject 

merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in the final phase of this 

investigation as parties must file an 

entry of appearance with the Secretary 

to the Commission, as provided in 

section 201.11 of the Commission’s 

rules, no later than 21 days prior to the 

hearing date specified in this notice. A 

party that filed a notice of appearance 

during the preliminary phase of the 

investigation need not file an additional 

notice of appearance during this final 

phase. The Secretary will maintain a 

public service list containing the names 

and addresses of all persons, or their 

representatives, who are parties to the 

investigation. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and BPI service list.—Pursuant to 

section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s 

rules, the Secretary will make BPI 

gathered in the final phase of this 

investigation available to authorized 

applicants under the APO issued in the 

investigation, provided that the 

application is made no later than 21 

days prior to the hearing date specified 

in this notice. Authorized applicants 

must represent interested parties, as 

defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are 

parties to the investigation. A party 

granted access to BPI in the preliminary 

phase of the investigation need not 

reapply for such access. A separate 

service list will be maintained by the 

Secretary for those parties authorized to 

receive BPI under the APO. 

Staff report.—The prehearing staff 

report in the final phase of this 

investigation will be placed in the 

nonpublic record on October 26, 2004, 

and a public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to section 207.22 of 

the Commission’s rules.

Hearing.—The Commission will hold 

a hearing in connection with the final 

phase of this investigation beginning at 

9:30 a.m. on November 9, 2004, at the 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

Building. Requests to appear at the 

hearing should be filed in writing with 

the Secretary to the Commission on or 

before October 29, 2004. A nonparty 

who has testimony that may aid the 

Commission’s deliberations may request 

permission to present a short statement 

at the hearing. All parties and 

nonparties desiring to appear at the 

hearing and make oral presentations 

should attend a prehearing conference 

to be held at 9:30 a.m. on November 2, 

2004, at the U.S. International Trade 

Commission Building. Oral testimony 

and written materials to be submitted at 

the public hearing are governed by 

sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), and 

207.24 of the Commission’s rules. 

Parties must submit any request to 

present a portion of their hearing 

testimony in camera no later than 7 

days prior to the date of the hearing. 

Written submissions.—Each party 

who is an interested party shall submit 

a prehearing brief to the Commission. 

Prehearing briefs must conform with the 

provisions of section 207.23 of the 

Commission’s rules; the deadline for 

filing is November 2, 2004. Parties may 

also file written testimony in connection 

with their presentation at the hearing, as 

provided in section 207.24 of the 

Commission’s rules, and posthearing 

briefs, which must conform with the 

provisions of section 207.25 of the 

Commission’s rules. The deadline for 

filing posthearing briefs is November 17, 

2004; witness testimony must be filed 

no later than three days before the 

hearing. In addition, any person who 

has not entered an appearance as a party 

to the investigation may submit a 

written statement of information 

pertinent to the subject of the 

investigation on or before November 17, 

2004. On December 3, 2004, the 

Commission will make available to 

parties all information on which they 

have not had an opportunity to 

comment. Parties may submit final 

comments on this information on or 

before December 7, 2004, but such final 

comments must not contain new factual 

information and must otherwise comply 

with section 207.30 of the Commission’s 

rules. All written submissions must 

conform with the provisions of section 

201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any 

submissions that contain BPI must also 

conform with the requirements of 

sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the 

Commission’s rules. The Commission’s 

rules do not authorize filing of 

submissions with the Secretary by 

facsimile or electronic means, except to 

the extent permitted by section 201.8 of 

the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 

Fed. Reg. 68036 (November 8, 2002). 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, 

each document filed by a party to the 

investigation must be served on all other 

parties to the investigation (as identified 

by either the public or BPI service list), 

and a certificate of service must be 

timely filed. The Secretary will not 

42454 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 135 / Thursday, July 15, 2004 / Notices 

accept a document for filing without a 

certificate of service.

Authority: This investigation is being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: July 8, 2004. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04–15985 Filed 7–14–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 67313

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture From the People’s Republic 

of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final determination of 

sales at less than fair value. 

SUMMARY: On June 24, 2004, the 

Department of Commerce published its 

preliminary determination of sales at 

less than fair value in the antidumping 

investigation of wooden bedroom 

furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China. On August 5, 2004, the 

Department of Commerce published an 

amended preliminary determination of 

sales at less than fair value. On 

September 9, 2004, the Department of 

Commerce published an amended 

preliminary determination of sales at 

less than fair value. The period of 

investigation is April 1, 2003, through 

September 30, 2003. The investigation 

covers seven manufacturers/exporters 

which are mandatory respondents and 

115 Section A respondents. We invited 

interested parties to comment on our 

preliminary determination of sales at 

less than fair value. Based on our 

analysis of the comments we received, 

we have made changes to our 

calculations for all mandatory 

respondents. The final dumping 

margins for this investigation are listed 

in the ‘‘Final Determination Margins’’

section below.

DATES: Effective November 17, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Catherine Bertrand or Robert Bolling, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3207 

and (202) 482–3434, respectively. 

Final Determination 

We determine that wooden bedroom 

furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) is being, or is likely to 

be, sold in the United States at Less 

Than Fair Value (‘‘LTFV’’) as provided 

in section 735 of Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the 

Act’’). The estimated margins of sales at 

LTFV are shown in the ‘‘Final 

Determination Margins’’ section of this 

notice. 

Case History 

The Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published its preliminary 

determination of sales at LTFV on June 

24, 2004. See Notice of Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Postponement of Final 

Determination: Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China, 69 FR 35312 (June 24, 2004) 

(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). The 

Department conducted verification of 

the mandatory respondents in both the 

PRC and the United States (where 

applicable), with the exception of Tech 

Lane Wood Mfg. and Kee Jia Wood Mfg. 

(‘‘Tech Lane’’), and certain Section A 

respondents’ data in the PRC. See the 

Verification Section below for 

additional information. On August 5, 

2004, the Department published an 

amended preliminary determination. 

See Notice of Amended Preliminary 

Antidumping Duty Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 

Republic of China, 69 FR 47417 (August 

5, 2004) (‘‘Amendment 1’’). On August 

17, 2004, parties submitted surrogatevalue information. On August 30, 2004, 

the Department issued a memorandum 

regarding the request for treatment of 

the Chinese wooden bedroom furniture 

industry as market-oriented. See 

Memorandum to James J. Jochum from 

Jeffrey May, Request for MarketOriented Industry (‘‘MOI’’) Treatment, 

dated August 30, 2004 (‘‘MOI 

Memorandum’’), and MOI section 

below. On August 31, 2004, the 

Department released a clarification 

regarding the scope of this investigation 

and explained that jewelry armoires and 

cheval mirrors are not within the scope 

of the investigation. See Issue and 

Decision Memorandum Concerning 

Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors, 

dated August 31, 2004. On September 9, 

2004, the Department published another 

amended preliminary determination. 

See Notice of Amended Preliminary 

Antidumping Duty Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Amendment to the Scope: Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s 

Republic of China, 69 FR 54643 

(September 9, 2004) (‘‘Amendment 2’’). 

On September 28, 2004, the Department 

issued a memorandum clarifying which 

types of mirrors are within the scope of 

this investigation. See Issue and 

Decision Memorandum Concerning 

Mirrors, dated September 28, 2004. 

On September 16, 2004, the 

Department issued a memorandum in 

which it explained that it rejected the 

request by Decca Furniture Ltd. for a 

separate rate because its request for such 

treatment was untimely. See 

Memorandum from Jeffrey May to James 

J. Jochum, Untimely Section A 

Questionnaire Submission of Decca 

Furniture Ltd., dated September 16, 

2004. Additionally, on September 16, 

2004, the Department issued a 

memorandum which stated that the 

Department rejected numerous potential 

Section A respondents’ Section A 

submissions because they were 

untimely. See Memorandum from James 

J. Jochum from Jeffrey May, Untimely 

Request for Separate-Rates Status of 

Certain PRC Exporters, dated September 

16, 2004.

We invited parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Determination. We received 

comments from the Petitioners, the 

mandatory respondents, the Section A 

respondents, and other interested 

parties to this investigation. 

On October 6, 2004, parties submitted 

case briefs. On October 14, 2004, parties 

submitted rebuttal briefs. On October 

19, 2004, the Department held a public 

hearing on MOI and Section A issues. 

On October 20, 2004, the Department 

held a public hearing on issues 

concerning the selection of a surrogate 

country, financial ratios, surrogate 

values, and mandatory respondents. On 

October 27, 2004, the Department held 

a public hearing on scope comments. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this 

investigation are addressed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum, dated 

November 8, 2004, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice (‘‘Decision 

Memorandum’’). A list of the issues 

which parties raised and to which we 

respond in the Decision Memorandum 

is attached to this notice as an 

Appendix. The Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file in 

the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Main 

Commerce Building, Room B–099, and 

is accessible on the Web at http://

ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the memorandum 

are identical in content.

67314 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 

1A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-ofdrawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be 

in two or more sections), with one or two sections 

mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly 

larger chest; also known as a tallboy.

2A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers 

usually composed of a base and a top section with 

drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest 

(often 15 inches or more in height).

3A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, 

not more than four feet high, normally set on short 

legs.

4A chest of drawers is typically a case containing 

drawers for storing clothing.

5A chest is typically a case piece taller than it 

is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or 

without one or more doors for storing clothing. The 

piece can either include drawers or be designed as 

a large box incorporating a lid.

6A door chest is typically a chest with hinged 

doors to store clothing, whether or not containing 

drawers. The piece may also include shelves for 

televisions and other entertainment electronics.

7A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest 

of drawers normally used for storing undergarments 

and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached.

8A hutch is typically an open case of furniture 

with shelves that typically sits on another piece of 

furniture and provides storage for clothes.

9An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or 

wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, 

and with one or more drawers (either exterior below 

or above the doors or interior behind the doors), 

shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for 

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used 

to hold television receivers and/or other audiovisual entertainment systems.

10As used herein, bentwood means solid wood 

made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to 

a curved shape by bending it while made pliable 

with moist heat or other agency and then set by 

cooling or drying. See Customs’ Headquarters’

Ruling Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976.

11Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for 

the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24′′ in 

width, 18′′ in depth, and 49′′ in height, including 

a minimum of 5 lined drawers lined with felt or 

felt-like material, at least one side door lined with 

felt or felt-like material, with necklace hangers, and 

a flip-top lid with inset mirror. See Memorandum 

from Laurel LaCivita to Laurie Parkhill, Office 

Director, Issues and Decision Memorandum 

Concerning Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in 

the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China dated August 31, 2004.

12Cheval mirrors, i.e., any framed, tiltable mirror 

with a height in excess of 50′′ that is mounted on 

a floor-standing, hinged base.

13Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture 

parts made of wood products (as defined above) 

that are not otherwise specifically named in this 

scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, wooden 

footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and 

wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess 

the essential character of wooden bedroom 

furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or 

unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified 

in subheading 9403.90.7000, HTSUS.

Scope of Investigation 

For purposes of this investigation, the 

product covered is wooden bedroom 

furniture. Wooden bedroom furniture is 

generally, but not exclusively, designed, 

manufactured, and offered for sale in 

coordinated groups, or bedrooms, in 

which all of the individual pieces are of 

approximately the same style and 

approximately the same material and/or 

finish. The subject merchandise is made 

substantially of wood products, 

including both solid wood and also 

engineered wood products made from 

wood particles, fibers, or other wooden 

materials such as plywood, oriented 

strand board, particle board, and 

fiberboard, with or without wood 

veneers, wood overlays, or laminates, 

with or without non-wood components 

or trim such as metal, marble, leather, 

glass, plastic, or other resins, and 

whether or not assembled, completed, 

or finished. 

The subject merchandise includes the 

following items: (1) Wooden beds such 

as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; 

(2) wooden headboards for beds 

(whether stand-alone or attached to side 

rails), wooden footboards for beds, 

wooden side rails for beds, and wooden 

canopies for beds; (3) night tables, night 

stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, 

mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, 

bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, 

wardrobes, vanities, chessers, 

chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; 

(4) dressers with framed glass mirrors 

that are attached to, incorporated in, sit 

on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chestson-chests,1 highboys,2 lowboys,3 chests 

of drawers,4 chests,5 door chests,6

chiffoniers,7 hutches,8 and armoires;9

(6) desks, computer stands, filing 

cabinets, book cases, or writing tables 

that are attached to or incorporated in 

the subject merchandise; and (7) other 

bedroom furniture consistent with the 

above list.

The scope of the Petition excludes the 

following items: (1) Seats, chairs, 

benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, 

stools, and other seating furniture; (2) 

mattresses, mattress supports (including 

box springs), infant cribs, water beds, 

and futon frames; (3) office furniture, 

such as desks, stand-up desks, computer 

cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and 

bookcases; (4) dining room or kitchen 

furniture such as dining tables, chairs, 

servers, sideboards, buffets, corner 

cabinets, china cabinets, and china 

hutches; (5) other non-bedroom 

furniture, such as television cabinets, 

cocktail tables, end tables, occasional 

tables, wall systems, book cases, and 

entertainment systems; (6) bedroom 

furniture made primarily of wicker, 

cane, osier, bamboo or rattan; (7) side 

rails for beds made of metal if sold 

separately from the headboard and 

footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in 

which bentwood parts predominate;10

(9) jewelry armories;11 (10) cheval 

mirrors 12 and (11) certain metal parts.13

Imports of subject merchandise are 

classified under statistical category 

9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as ‘‘wooden 

* * * beds’’ and under statistical 

category 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS as 

‘‘other * * * wooden furniture of a kind 

used in the bedroom.’’ In addition, 

wooden headboards for beds, wooden 

footboards for beds, wooden side rails 

for beds, and wooden canopies for beds 

may also be entered under statistical 

category 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as 

‘‘parts of wood’’ and framed glass 

mirrors may also be entered under 

statistical category 7009.92.5000 of the 

HTSUS as ‘‘glass mirrors * * * 

framed.’’ This investigation covers all 

wooden bedroom furniture meeting the 

above description, regardless of tariff 

classification. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of this 

proceeding is dispositive.

Scope Comments 

In the Preliminary Determination we 

stated that, due to the extraordinary 

detail and length of comments we had 

received to date, we would analyze 

scope comments we received for the 

final determination. As part of this 

process, the Department had 

summarized all of the comments it had 

received as of June 17, 2004, in a 

memorandum to the file. See 

Memorandum to the File from Laurel 

LaCivita, Analyst, to Laurie Parkhill, 

Office Director, Antidumping Duty 

Investigation of Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China: Summary on Comments to the 

Scope (June 17, 2004). Thus, we 

afforded interested parties an 

opportunity to address only the 

comments summarized in our 

memorandum and, as announced in the 

Preliminary Determination, 69 FR 

35318, we provided interested parties 

until July 30, 2004, to submit additional 

comments on scope topics in this 

memorandum. 

As of July 30, 2004, we had received 

scope comments reflecting issues in our 

memorandum and we had received 

scope comments on issues not discussed 

in our memorandum. Therefore, 

consistent with our Preliminary 

Determination, we clarified for all 

interested parties in a letter dated 

October 25, 2004, that for the final 

determination we would only address 

comments we received by July 30, 2004,

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 67315

which concerned issues we identified in 

our June 17, 2004, memorandum. 

We have addressed these comments 

in our final scope memorandum. See 

Memorandum to Laurie Parkhill, Office 

Director, from Erol Yesin, Case Analyst, 

Antidumping Duty Investigation of 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Summary 

on the Scope of the Investigation

(November 8, 2004). 

Verification 

As provided in section 782(I) of the 

Act, we verified the information 

submitted by the mandatory 

respondents, with the exception of Tech 

Lane as discussed below, and certain 

Section A respondents for use in our 

final determination. See the 

Department’s verification reports on the 

record of this investigation in the CRU 

with respect to Rui Feng Woodwork Co., 

Ltd., Rui Feng Lumber Development 

Co., Ltd. and Dorbest Limited 

(‘‘Dorbest’’), Lacquer Craft Mfg. Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Lacquer Craft’’), Dongguan Lung Dong 

Furniture Co., Ltd., and Dongguan Dong 

He Furniture Co., Ltd., (‘‘Lung Dong’’), 

Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) 

Manufacturing Company, Ltd. 

(‘‘Markor’’), Shing Mark Enterprise Co., 

Ltd., Carven Industries Limited (BVI), 

Carven I Industries Limited (HK), 

Dongguan Zhenxin Furniture Co., Ltd., 

and Dongguan Yongpeng Furniture Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Shing Mark’’), Starcorp Furniture 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Orin Furniture 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and Shanghai 

Starcorp Furniture Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Starcorp’’), Dalian Huafeng Furniture 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dalian’’), Locke Furniture 

Factory, or Kai Chan Furniture Co., Ltd., 

or Kai Chan (Hong Kong) Enterprise 

Ltd., or Taiwan Kai Chan Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Locke’’), and Fine Furniture 

(Shanghai) Limited (‘‘Fine Furniture’’). 

For all verified companies, we used 

standard verification procedures, 

including examination of relevant 

accounting and production records, as 

well as original source documents 

provided by respondents. 

Market-Oriented Industry 

In the Preliminary Determination, we 

stated that, because we received an MOI 

allegation filed by the Furniture Subchamber of the China Chamber of 

Commerce for Import & Export of Light 

Industrial Products and Arts-Crafts 

(‘‘CCCLA’’) and the China National 

Furniture Association (‘‘CNFA’’) with 

supporting information so recently and 

so close (i.e., May 28, 2004) to the fully 

extended due date of the preliminary 

determination, we did not have 

adequate time to consider the 

information. Thus, we indicated that we 

would continue to evaluate the request 

and address it as soon as possible. On 

August 30, 2004, we issued a 

memorandum regarding the request by 

CCCLA and CNFA for an MOI inquiry. 

See MOI Memorandum. In this 

memorandum, we stated that, due to the 

timing of the MOI request filing, we 

determined that we would not 

incorporate an MOI inquiry into this 

antidumping investigation. In addition, 

we explained that, in the event we 

publish an antidumping duty order as a 

result of an affirmative determination by 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘ITC’’), the Chinese 

wooden bedroom furniture industry will 

have an opportunity to request an MOI 

inquiry in a future segment of this 

proceeding. See MOI Memorandum and 

Comment 1 in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Surrogate Country 

In the Preliminary Determination, we 

stated that we had selected India as the 

appropriate surrogate country to use in 

this investigation for the following 

reasons: (1) India is at a level of 

economic development comparable to 

the PRC; (2) Indian manufacturers 

produce comparable merchandise and 

are significant producers of wooden 

furniture; (3) India provides the best 

opportunity to use appropriate, publicly 

available data to value the factors of 

production. See Preliminary 

Determination, 69 FR at 35319. We 

received comments from interested 

parties during the briefing stage of this 

investigation and have evaluated these 

comments. For the final determination 

we have determined to continue to use 

India as the surrogate country and, 

accordingly, we have calculated normal 

value using Indian prices to value the 

respondents’ factors of production, 

when available and appropriate. We 

have obtained and relied upon publicly 

available information wherever 

possible. For a detailed description of 

the surrogate values that have changed 

as a result of comments the Department 

has received, see the company-specific 

Analysis Memoranda dated November 

8, 2004. 

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Determination and 

the amendments to the Preliminary 

Determination the Department found 

that several companies which provided 

responses to Section A of the 

antidumping questionnaire were eligible 

for a rate separate from the PRC-wide 

rate. For the final determination, we 

have determined that additional 

companies have qualified for separaterate status. For a complete listing of all 

the companies that received a separate 

rate, see the Final Determination 

Margins section below. 

As discussed below, the Department 

has determined to apply adverse facts 

available with respect to Tech Lane. In 

addition, we have determined that there 

is no reliable basis for granting Tech 

Lane a separate rate. Accordingly, Tech 

Lane has not overcome the presumption 

that it is part of the PRC-wide entity and 

therefore, will be subject to the PRCwide rate. 

The margin we calculated in the 

Preliminary Determination for these 

companies was 10.92 percent and was 

changed in Amendment 2 to 12.91 

percent. Because the rates of the 

selected mandatory respondents have 

changed since the Preliminary 

Determination and the Amendment 2, 

we have recalculated the rate for Section 

A respondents. The rate is 8.64 percent. 

See Memorandum to the File from 

Eugene Degnan, Calculation of Section 

A Rate, dated November 8, 2004.

Additionally, at the Preliminary 

Determination, we determined 

preliminarly that Shanghai Aosen 

Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Aosen’’), 

had satisfied our criteria for a separate 

rate. During the week of July 12, 2004, 

we informed Shanghai Aosen that we 

would verify its submitted data on or 

about August 13, 2004. On August 3, 

2004, Shanghai Aosen informed the 

Department that it had decided not to 

participate in its verification which was 

scheduled to take place on August 13, 

2004. See Memorandum to the File from 

Katharine Huang, Shanghai Aosen’s 

Withdrawal from the Antidumping Duty 

Investigation of Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) dated August 3, 2004. 

Because Shanghai Aosen refused to 

allow the Department to verify its 

submissions, the Department has 

determined that Shanghai Aosen has not 

cooperated to the best of its ability and 

that as adverse facts available, we 

determine that Shanghai Aosen is the 

part of the PRC-wide entity and 

therefore, does not qualify for a separate 

rate. Thus, effective the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this determination, Shanghai Aosen will 

be subject to the PRC-wide rate. 

Adverse Facts Available 

Section 776(a)(2) of the Act provides 

that the Department shall apply ‘‘facts 

otherwise available’’ if, inter alia, an 

interested party or any other person (A) 

withholds information that has been 

requested, (B) fails to provide 

information within the deadlines 

established, or in the form or manner 

requested by the Department, subject to

67316 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 

subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782, 

(C) significantly impedes a proceeding, 

or (D) provides information that cannot 

be verified as provided by section 782(i) 

of the Act. Section 776(b) of the Act 

provides further that the Department 

may use an adverse inference when a 

party has failed to cooperate by not 

acting to the best of its ability to comply 

with a request for information. 

Where the Department determines 

that a response to a request for 

information does not comply with the 

request, section 782(d) of the Act 

provides that the Department will so 

inform the party submitting the 

response and will, to the extent 

practicable, provide that party the 

opportunity to remedy or explain the 

deficiency. If the party fails to remedy 

the deficiency within the applicable 

time limits and subject to section 782(e) 

of the Act, the Department may 

disregard all or part of the original and 

subsequent responses, as appropriate. 

Section 782(e) of the Act provides that 

the Department ‘‘shall not decline to 

consider information that is submitted 

by an interested party and is necessary 

to the determination but does not meet 

all applicable requirements established 

by the administering authority’’ if the 

information is timely, can be verified, 

and is not so incomplete that it cannot 

be used, and if the interested party acted 

to the best of its ability in providing the 

information. Where all of these 

conditions are met, the statute requires 

the Department to use the information if 

it can do so without undue difficulties. 

In the Preliminary Determination, we 

determined a dumping margin of 9.36 

percent for Tech Lane based on partial 

facts available for certain unreported 

surrogate values. See Preliminary 

Determination. On June 29, 2004, the 

Petitioners submitted allegations that 

the Department made various 

ministerial errors in calculating the 

dumping margin for Tech Lane. As a 

result of our correction of ministerial 

errors, we determined a corrected 

margin of 29.72 percent for Tech Lane 

in Amendment 1. We also stated in 

Amendment 1 that we would not 

conduct a verification of Tech Lane due 

to the fact Tech Lane did not provide 

financial statements covering reported 

subject merchandise and because Tech 

Lane did not submit a reconciliation of 

sales it made during the period of 

investigation (‘‘POI’’) as we requested. 

We indicated that, as a result, the rate 

for Tech Lane might change for 

purposes of the final determination. See 

Amendment 1, 69 FR at 47417, footnote 

1.

Based on the record evidence and 

pursuant to the statutory requirements 

of the Act, the Department has 

determined that Tech Lane impeded 

this investigation, provided unverifiable 

information, and did not cooperate to 

the best of its ability to comply with the 

Department’s requests for information. 

Therefore, we find that the use of 

adverse facts available to determine the 

margin for Tech Lane is proper for the 

final determination in this investigation. 

See Comment 4 in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for a further 

discussion of this issue. 

Partial Adverse Facts Available 

We have determined that the use of a 

partial adverse inference is warranted 

for certain constructed export price 

(‘‘CEP’’) sales Shing Mark made. 

We have determined that Shing Mark 

did not act to the best of its ability with 

respect to a CEP control-number error, 

nor did it act the best of its ability in 

reporting the sales information with 

respect to certain CEP sales and the 

corrected data. At the verification of 

Shing Mark’s U.S. affiliate, Homerica 

Inc., we discovered that Shing Mark had 

mis-coded a portion of its reported CEP 

control numbers. The Department had 

indicated earlier in its April 28, 2004, 

supplemental questionnaire and again 

in its June 4, 2004, supplemental 

questionnaire that it had found 

problems with certain reported control 

numbers and, within these control 

numbers, price variations of CEP sales 

that Shing Mark never addressed fully 

or in a timely manner. At the very least, 

even if wide price variations are normal 

within a control number, such price 

variations should have caused Shing 

Mark to at least check the accuracy of 

the information it reported to the 

Department. Additionally, we find that, 

at a minimum, before the first CEP 

verification, Shing Mark should have 

reviewed our pre-selected sales invoices 

which would have also alerted Shing 

Mark to the above problems. Further, 

the Department alerted the respondent 

on several different occasions either 

explicitly (through its supplemental 

questionnaires) or implicitly (the very 

reason for the Department’s selection of 

certain CEP sales for verification was 

due to wide price variations) to the 

problems with certain sales. Thus, 

because Shing Mark was in the best 

position to check and report its own 

information accurately plus the fact that 

Shing Mark reported continually that it 

had corrected its information or that 

there were no problems, we relied upon 

its reported information until we 

discovered the errors at the first CEP 

verification. Additionally, the 

Department did everything it could to 

alert Shing Mark to the problem. 

Consequently, in accordance with 

section 776 of the Act, the Department 

has applied adverse facts available for 

certain CEP sales whose control 

numbers Shing Mark reported 

incorrectly because the U.S. sales data 

that Shing Mark submitted to correct the 

errors is unverifiable, the U.S. sales data 

remains so incomplete that it cannot be 

used as a reliable basis for reaching an 

accurate margin in this investigation, 

and Shing Mark did not act to the best 

of its ability to find and correct the 

errors. Therefore, for the 

aforementioned reasons, the Department 

has applied the adverse facts available 

rate of 198.08 percent (see below) to all 

of Shing Mark’s CEP sales where the 

control-number misclassification 

occurred. See the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 63 and the 

Shing Mark Final Analysis 

Memorandum, dated November 8, 2004. 

Adverse Facts-Available Rate 

In the Preliminary Determination, in 

accordance with sections 776(b) and (c) 

of the Act, to corroborate the adverse 

facts-available margin (i.e.,198.08 

percent), we compared that margin to 

the margins we found for the mandatory 

respondents. See Memorandum to the 

File from Brian Ledgerwood, Analyst, 

through Robert Bolling, Program 

Manager, and Laurie Parkhill, Office 

Director, Preliminary Determination in 

the Investigation of Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China, Corroboration Memorandum,

dated June 17, 2004. 

At the Preliminary Determination, in 

accordance with section 776(c) of the 

Act, we corroborated our adverse factsavailable margin using information 

submitted by Tech Lane and Kee Jia 

Wood Mfg. For the final determination, 

we are no longer using the information 

submitted by Tech Lane to corroborate 

our adverse facts-available margin (see 

Adverse Facts Available section above). 

To assess the probative value of the 

total adverse facts-available rate it has 

chosen, the Department compared the 

final margin calculations of other 

respondents in this investigation with 

the rate of 198.08 percent from the 

petition. We find that the rate is within 

the range of the highest margins we 

have determined in this investigation. 

See Memorandum to the File from 

Catherine Bertrand, Analyst, through 

Robert Bolling, Program Manager, and 

Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, Final 

Determination in the Investigation of 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China, 

Corroboration Memorandum (‘‘Final 

Corroboration Memo’’), dated November 

8, 2004. Since the record of this

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 67317

investigation contains margins within 

the range of the petition margin, we 

determine that the rate from the petition 

continues to be relevant for use in this 

investigation. 

As discussed therein, we found that 

the margin of 198.08 percent has 

probative value. See Final Corroboration 

Memo. Accordingly, we find that the 

rate of 198.08 percent is corroborated 

within the meaning of section 776(c) of 

the Act.

The PRC-Wide Rate 

Because we begin with the 

presumption that all companies within 

a non market-economy (‘‘NME’’) 

country are subject to government 

control and because only the companies 

listed under the Final Determination 

Margins below have overcome that 

presumption, we are applying a single 

antidumping rate—the PRC-wide rate—

to all other exporters of subject 

merchandise from the PRC. Such 

companies did not demonstrate 

entitlement to a separate rate. See, e.g., 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Synthetic Indigo from 

the People’s Republic of China, 65 FR 

25706 (May 3, 2000). The PRC-wide rate 

applies to all entries of subject 

merchandise except for entries from the 

respondents which are listed in the 

Final Determination Margins section 

below (except as noted). 

Final Determination Margins 

We determine that the following 

percentage weighted-average margins 

exist for the POI:

Company 

Weighted-average 

margin

(percent) 

Dongguan Lung Dong Furniture Co., Ltd., or Dongguan Dong He Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................ 2.22 

Rui Feng Woodwork Co., Ltd., or Rui Feng Lumber Development Co., Ltd. or Dorbest Limited ................................................ 16.70 

Lacquer Craft Mfg. Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................... 6.95 

Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacturing Company, Ltd ......................................................................................... 0.79 

Shing Mark Enterprise Co., Ltd., or Carven Industries Limited (BVI), or Carven I Industries Limited (HK), or Dongguan 

Zhenxin Furniture Co., Ltd., or Dongguan Yongpeng Furniture Co., Ltd .................................................................................. 5.07 

Starcorp Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or Orin Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Starcorp Furniture Co., Ltd ....... 15.24 

Tech Lane Wood Mfg. or Kee Jia Wood Mfg * ............................................................................................................................. 198.08 

Alexandre International Corp., or Southern Art Development Ltd., or Alexandre Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., or Southern 

Art Furniture Factory .................................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Art Heritage International, Ltd., or Super Art Furniture Co., Ltd., or Artwork Metal & Plastic Co., Ltd., or Jibson Industries 

Ltd., or Always Loyal International ............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Billy Wood Industrial (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., or Great Union Industrial (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., or Time Faith Ltd ...................... 8.64 

Changshu HTC Import & Export Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Cheng Meng Furniture (PTE) Ltd., or China Cheng Meng Decoration & Furniture Co., Ltd ....................................................... 8.64 

Chuan Fa Furniture Factory .......................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Classic Furniture Global Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Clearwise Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

COE Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dalian Guangming Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dalian Huafeng Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Dongguan Cambridge Furniture Co., or Glory Oceanic Co., Ltd .................................................................................................. 8.64 

Dongguan Chunsan Wood Products Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dongguan Creation Furniture Co., Ltd., or Creation Industries Co., Ltd ...................................................................................... 8.64 

Dongguan Grand Style Furniture, or Hong Kong Da Zhi Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................ 8.64 

Dongguan Great Reputation Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Dongguan Hero Way Woodwork Co., Ltd., or Dongguan Da Zhong Woodwork Co., Ltd., or Hero Way Enterprises Ltd., or 

Well Earth International Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dongguan Hung Sheng Artware Products Co., Ltd., or Coronal Enterprise Co., Ltd .................................................................. 8.64 

Dongguan Kin Feng Furniture Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dongguan Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd., or Kingstone Furniture Co., Ltd .................................................................................. 8.64 

Dongguan Liaobushangdun Huada Furniture Factory, or Great Rich (HK) Enterprise Co. Ltd ................................................... 8.64 

Dongguan Qingxi Xinyi Craft Furniture Factory (Joyce Art Factory) ............................................................................................ 8.64 

Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., or Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., or Shanghai Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., or 

Fairmont Designs ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dongying Huanghekou Furniture Industry Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Dream Rooms Furniture (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., or Eurosa Furniture Co., (PTE) Ltd ................................................................................................. 8.64 

Ever Spring Furniture Co. Ltd., or S.Y.C. Family Enterprise Co., Ltd .......................................................................................... 8.64 

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Foshan Guanqiu Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd., or Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc ..................................................................................................... 8.64 

Gaomi Yatai Wooden Ware Co., Ltd., or Team Prospect International Ltd., or Money Gain International Co ........................... 8.64 

Garri Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., or Molabile International, Inc., or Weei Geo Enterprise Co., Ltd ................................... 8.64 

Green River Wood (Dongguan) Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Guangming Group Wumahe Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Hainan Jong Bao Lumber Co., Ltd., or Jibbon Enterprise Co., Ltd .............................................................................................. 8.64 

Hamilton & Spill Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Hang Hai Woodcraft’s Art Factory ................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Hualing Furniture (China) Co., Ltd., or Tony House Manufacture (China) Co., Ltd., or Buysell Investments Ltd., or Tony 

House Industries Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Jardine Enterprise, Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Jiangmen Kinwai Furniture Decoration Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Jiangmen Kinwai International Furniture Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Jiangsu Weifu Group Fullhouse Furniture Manufacturing Corp .................................................................................................... 8.64 

67318 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 

Company 

Weighted-average 

margin

(percent) 

Jiangsu Yuexing Furniture Group Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Jiedong Lehouse Furniture Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

King’s Way Furniture Industries Co., Ltd., or Kingsyear Ltd ......................................................................................................... 8.64 

Kuan Lin Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., or Kuan Lin Furniture Factory, or Kuan Lin Furniture Co., Ltd ............................... 8.64 

Kunshan Lee Wood Product Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Kunshan Summit Furniture Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Langfang Tiancheng Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Leefu Wood (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., or King Rich International, Ltd .............................................................................................. 8.64 

Link Silver Ltd. (V.I.B.), or Forward Win Enterprises Co. Ltd., or Dongguan Haoshun Furniture Ltd ......................................... 8.64 

Locke Furniture Factory, or Kai Chan Furniture Co., Ltd., or Kai Chan (Hong Kong) Enterprise Ltd., or Taiwan Kai Chan 

Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Longrange Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Nanhai Baiyi Woodwork Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Nantong Dongfang Orient Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Nantong Yushi Furniture Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Nathan International Ltd., or Nathan Rattan Factory .................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Orient International Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Co., Ltd .................................................................................................... 8.64 

Passwell Corporation, or Pleasant Wave Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Perfect Line Furniture Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Prime Wood International Co., Ltd., or Prime Best International Co., Ltd., or Prime Best Factory, or Liang Huang (Jiaxing) 

Enterprise Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

PuTian JingGong Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Qingdao Liangmu Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Restonic (Dongguan) Furniture Ltd., or Restonic Far East (Samoa) Ltd ..................................................................................... 8.64 

RiZhao SanMu Woodworking Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Season Furniture Manufacturing Co., or Season Industrial Development Co .............................................................................. 8.64 

Sen Yeong International Co., Ltd., or Sheh Hau International Trading Ltd .................................................................................. 8.64 

Shanghai Jian Pu Export & Import Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Shanghai Maoji Imp and Exp Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Sheng Jing Wood Products (Beijing) Co., Ltd., or Telstar Enterprises Ltd .................................................................................. 8.64 

Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Shenzhen Forest Furniture Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Shenzhen Jiafa High Grade Furniture Co., Ltd., or Golden Lion International Trading Ltd ......................................................... 8.64 

Shenzhen New Fudu Furniture Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Shenzhen Wonderful Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Shenzhen Xiande Furniture Factory .............................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Shenzhen Xingli Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Shun Feng Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Songgang Jasonwood Furniture Factory, or Jasonwood Industrial Co., Ltd. S.A ........................................................................ 8.64 

Starwood Furniture Manufacturing Co. Ltd ................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Starwood Industries Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Strongson Furniture (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., or Strongson Furniture Co., Ltd., or Strongson (HK) Co ......................................... 8.64 

Sunforce Furniture (Hui-Yang) Co., Ltd., or Sun Fung Wooden Factory, or Sun Fung Co., or Shin Feng Furniture Co., Ltd., 

or Stupendous International Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Superwood Co., Ltd., or Lianjin Zongyu Art Products Co., Ltd .................................................................................................... 8.64 

Tarzan Furniture Industries Ltd., or Samso Industries Ltd ........................................................................................................... 8.64 

Teamway Furniture (Dong Guan) Ltd., or Brittomart Inc .............................................................................................................. 8.64 

Techniwood Industries Ltd., or Ningbo Furniture Industries Limited, or Ningbo Hengrun Furniture Co., Ltd .............................. 8.64 

Tianjin Fortune Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Tianjin Master Home Furniture ...................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Tianjin Phu Shing Woodwork Enterprise Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Tianjin Sande Fairwood Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Tube-Smith Enterprise (ZhangZhou) Co., Ltd., or Tube-Smith Enterprise (Haimen) Co., Ltd., or Billonworth Enterprises Ltd .. 8.64 

Union Friend International Trade Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

U-Rich Furniture (Zhangzhou) Co., Ltd., or U-Rich Furniture Ltd ................................................................................................ 8.64 

Wanhengtong Nueevder (Furniture) Manufacture Co., Ltd., or Dongguan Wanengtong Industry Co., Ltd ................................. 8.64 

Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Xiamen Yongquan Sci-Tech Development Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Jiangsu XiangSheng Bedtime Furniture Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Xingli Arts & Crafts Factory of Yangchun ..................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Yangchun Hengli Co. Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Yeh Brothers World Trade, Inc ...................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Yichun Guangming Furniture Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Yida Co., Ltd., or Yitai Worldwide, Ltd., or Yili Co., Ltd., or Yetbuild Co., Ltd ............................................................................. 8.64 

Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Zhang Zhou Sanlong Wood Product Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Zhangjiagang Zheng Yan Decoration Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Zhangjiagang Daye Hotel Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

Zhangzhou Guohui Industrial & Trade Co. Ltd ............................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Zhanjiang Sunwin Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 67319

Company 

Weighted-average 

margin

(percent) 

Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... 8.64 

Zhongshan Golden King Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................. 8.64 

Zhoushan For-Strong Wood Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ 8.64 

PRC-Wide Rate ............................................................................................................................................................................. 198.08 

* Not a separate rate. Tech Lane and Kee Jia Wood Mfg. are subject to the PRC-wide rate. 

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

Pursuant to 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we 

will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to continue to 

suspend liquidation of all entries of 

subject merchandise from the PRC 

(except for entries of Markor because 

this company has a de minimis margin) 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after June 24, 

2004, the date of publication of the 

Preliminary Determination. In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.204(e)(3), 

the exclusion only applies to 

merchandise produced and exported by 

Markor. CBP shall continue to require a 

cash deposit or the posting of a bond 

equal to the estimated amount by which 

the normal value exceeds the U.S. price 

as shown above. These instructions 

suspending liquidation will remain in 

effect until further notice. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

ITC Notification 

In accordance with section 735(d) of 

the Act, we have notified the ITC of our 

final determination of sales at LTFV. As 

our final determination is affirmative 

with the exception of Markor Tianjin, in 

accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the 

Act, within 45 days the ITC will 

determine whether the domestic 

industry in the United States is 

materially injured, or threatened with 

material injury, by reason of imports or 

sales (or the likelihood of sales) for 

importation of the subject merchandise. 

If the ITC determines that material 

injury or threat of material injury does 

not exist, the proceeding will be 

terminated and all securities posted will 

be refunded or canceled. If the ITC 

determines that such injury does exist, 

the Department will issue an 

antidumping duty order directing the 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 

imports of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the effective 

date of the suspension of liquidation 

(i.e., June 24, 2004), with the exception 

of merchandise produced and exported 

by Markor Tianjin. 

Notification Regarding APO 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 

notification of return or destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

735(d) and 777(I)(1) of the Act.

Dated: November 8, 2004. 

James J. Jochum, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration.

Appendix 

Issues in the Decision Memorandum 

I. General Issues 

Comment 1: Market-Oriented Industry 

Comment 2: Surrogate-Country Selection 

Comment 3: Surrogate Financial Ratios 

Comment 4: Tech Lane 

Comment 5: Tech Lane Rate/Section A Rate 

Comment 6: Treatment of Abrasives 

Comment 7: Brokerage and Handling 

Comment 8: Treatment of Non-Dumped Sales 

Comment 9: Russian Timber Prices 

Comment 10: Use of Infodrive and IBIS Data 

Comment 11: Sets Reported by Markor and 

Lacquer Craft 

Comment 12: Electricity for Factory 

Overhead and SG&A 

Comment 13: Sigma Freight Rule and 

Market-Economy Purchases 

Comment 14: Furniture Parts 

Comment 15: Valuation of NME Self-Made, 

Semi-Finished, or Subcontracted Parts 

II. Surrogate Values 

Comment 16: Surrogate Value—General 

Comment 17: Purchase Price Information 

Comment 18: Exclusion of Aberrational Data 

Comment 19: Dorbest 

Comment 20: Lung Dong 

Comment 21: Markor 

Comment 22: Starcorp 

Comment 23: Labor Surrogate Value and 

Calculation of Expected NME Wages 

Comment 24: Reliability of Data 

Comment 25: Mirror, Glass, Glass Yug

Comment 26: Paint-General 

Comment 27: The Asian Paints Price List 

Comment 28: Packing Cardboard 

Comment 29: Packing Materials (Cardboard) 

III. Mandatory Respondents—CompanySpecific Issues 

A. Dorbest 

Comment 30: Commissions 

Comment 31: Cheval mirrors 

Comment 32: Brokerage and handling 

Comment 33: Offset adjustment for byproducts 

Comment 34: Direct selling expenses 

Comment 35: Conversion factors 

Comment 36: Contemporaneity of surrogatevalue data 

Comment 37: Free-of-charge merchandise 

Comment 38: Wood inputs 

Comment 39: Cardboard and Wood Scrap 

figures 

Comment 40: Diesel Fuel 

Comment 41: Packing labor 

Comment 42: Factors information for a 

certain item 

B. Lacquer Craft 

Comment 43: Rubberwood and Marupa 

Comment 44: CEP offset 

Comment 45: Negative Allowances 

Comment 46: Market Economy Purchases for 

Paint Inputs 

Comment 47: Overhead Expenses 

Comment 48: Warehousing Expenses 

C. Lung Dong 

Comment 49: Surrogate Value for MediumDensity Fiberboard 

Comment 50: Minor Corrections from 

Verification 

Comment 51: Clerical-Error Allegations 

Comment 52: Exclusion of Potentially NonSubject Merchandise 

Comment 53: Correction of Reported Control 

Number for Certain Product Codes 

Comment 54: Conversion Ratios for Veneer, 

Polyester Fabric, and Glass 

Comment 55: Medium-Density Fiberboard 

used for Packing 

Comment 56: Lung Dong’s Market-Economy 

Purchases of Adhesives and Other Inputs 

Comment 57: Weight-Averaging the Factors 

of Production 

D. Markor 

Comment 58: Affiliation 

E. Shing Mark 

Comment 59: Ministerial Errors 

Comment 60: U.S. Movement Expense 

Comment 61: Market Economy Purchases 

Comment 62: Transportation Distances 

Comment 63: Control-Number Errors

67320 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 17, 2004 / Notices 

F. Starcorp 

Comment 64: Unreported Sale 

Comment 65: Certain Wood Input 

Comment 66: Other Metal Fittings 

Comment 67: Mirrors 

Comment 68: Paint Price 

Comment 69: Wooden veneer 

Comment 70: Plywood 

IV. Section A Issues 

Comment 71: Section A Rate-Weighting 

Comment 72: Adverse facts available for 

Section A companies 

Comment 73: Locke Furniture 

Comment 74: Techniwood’s affiliates 

Comment 75: Shanghai Ideal and Shanghai 

Jian Pu 

Comment 76: Sunrise’s Request for Refund 

for Cash Deposit Overpayment 

Comment 77: Necessity of Submissions 

Comment 78: Notification 

Comment 79: Independence in Price 

Negotiation, Valid Business License and 

Autonomy in Management Selection 

Comment 80: Corporate Structure and 

Affiliations 

Comment 81: Independence of Retaining 

Sales Proceeds 

Comment 82: Timeliness

[FR Doc. 04–25507 Filed 11–16–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–25–P
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

B-1

APPENDIX B

CALENDAR OF PUBLIC HEARING

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

B-3

CALENDAR OF PUBLIC HEARING

Those listed below appeared as witnesses at the United States International Trade Commission’s

hearing:

Subject: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China

Inv. No.: 731-TA-1058 (Final)

Date and Time: November 9, 2004 – 9:30 a.m.

Sessions were held in connection with this investigation in the Main Hearing Room (room 101), 500

E Street, SW, Washington, DC.

OPENING REMARKS:

Petitioner (Joseph W. Dorn, King & Spalding LLP)

Respondents (John D. Greenwald, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP)

In Support of the Imposition of Antidumping Duties:

King & Spalding

Washington, DC

on behalf of

American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and its individual members

Cabinet Makers, Millmen, and Industrial Carpenters, Local 721

UBC Southern Council of Industrial Workers, Local Union 2305

United Steelworkers of America, Local 193U

Carpenters Industrial Union, Local 2093

Teamsters, Chauffeuers, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local 991

IUE, Industrial Division of CWA, Local 82472

John D. Bassett, III, Chairman, Steering Committee of the American Manufacturers Committee

for Legal Trade; and President and CEO, Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Co.

Noel L. Chitwood, President, American of Martinsville

Irwin Allen, President and CEO, Michels-Pilliod Co.

John E. Wentworth, President, Moosehead Manufacturing Co.

Kenneth Herman Burnette, President, East Coast Plywood Co.

Wyatt Bassett, Executive Vice President, Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Co.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

B-4

In Support of the Imposition of Antidumping Duties (continued):

John A. Sandberg, President, Sandberg Furniture Mfg. Co., Inc.

Keith R. Sanders, Executive Vice President, Operations, Bassett Furniture Industries

Harold Brown, General Manager, Bassett Furniture Direct

Ken Loring, President, Boston Interiors

Christopher Heinz, Political and Legislative Director, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and

Joiners of America

Bruce Malashevich, President, Economic Consulting Services, Inc.

Joseph W. Dorn ) – OF COUNSEL

Stephen A. Jones )

Stephen J. Narkin )

In Opposition to the Imposition of Antidumping Duties:

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

Washington, DC

on behalf of

Lacquer Craft Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Markor International Furniture (Tianjin) Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

Committee for Free Trade in Furniture

Harvey Dondero, President and CEO, Universal Furniture International

Craig Spooner, Chief Financial Officer, Lexington Furniture Co.

John D. Greenwald ) – OF COUNSEL

Lynn M. Fischer )

Deirdre Maloney )
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

B-5

In Opposition to the Imposition of Antidumping Duties (continued):

Hunton & Williams

Washington, DC

on behalf of

Furniture Retailers of America (“FRA”)

Jeffrey Seaman, President and CEO, Rooms To Go Inc.

Clarence Ridley, Chairman, Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.

James McAlister, Operations Manager, Quality and Sourcing, JCPenney Purchasing Corp.

John G. Reilly, Economist, Nathan Associates, Inc.

William Silverman ) – OF COUNSEL

Richard P. Ferrin )

James R. Simoes )

Bryan Cave

Washington, DC

on behalf of

Furniture Brands International, Inc.

Lynn Chipperfield, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, Furniture Brands

International, Inc.

Stanley J. Marcuss ) – OF COUNSEL

Jill A. Cramer )

Venable

Washington, DC

 and

Arent Fox 

Washington, DC

on behalf of

Guangzhou Maria Yee Furnishings Ltd. (“GZMYFL”)

Pyla HK Limited (“Pyla”)

Maria Yee Inc. (“MYI”)

Peter Yee, President, GZMYFL; Director, Pyla; and CEO, MYI

Maria Yee, Vice President, GZMYFL; Director, Pyla; and President, MYI

Steve Freeman, Vendor Resource Manager, Room and Board, Inc.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

B-6

In Opposition to the Imposition of Antidumping Duties (continued):

Harvey J. Silverstone, Corporate Secretary and General Counsel, Euromarket Designs Inc.

d/b/a Crate and Barrel

Jerome J. Zaucha ) – OF COUNSEL

Daniel J. Gerkin )

Nancy A. Noonan )

Patricia P. Yeh )

Crowell & Moring

Washington, DC

on behalf of

Coalition of Certain Chinese Furniture Producers

Matthew P. Jaffe ) – OF COUNSEL

REBUTTAL/CLOSING REMARKS

Petitioners (Joseph W. Dorn, King & Spalding)

Respondents (John D. Greenwald, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr)
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

C-1

APPENDIX C

SUMMARY DATA

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

C-3

Table C-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: Summary data concerning the U.S. market, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Quantity=pieces; value=$1,000; unit labor costs are per piece; period changes=percent, except where noted

Item

Reported data Period changes

Calendar year January-June Calendar year Jan.-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 2001-03 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04

U.S. consumption value:

Amount 4,123,585.0 4,461,603 4,666,667 2,248,362 2,517,646 13.2 8.2 4.6 12.0

Producers’ share 1 55.6 48.2 40.3 42.7 35.7 -15.4 -7.4 -7.9 -7.0

Importers’ share:1

China (subject) *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Nonsubject sources:

China *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Brazil 1.8 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.4

Indonesia 3.4 3.2 3.2 3.5 0.0 0.2 -0.2 0.3

Malaysia 1.1 1.5 2.5 2.2 3.0 1.4 0.4 0.9 0.7

Mexico 3.5 2.9 2.1 2.2 1.8 -1.4 -0.7 -0.8 -0.4

Vietnam 0.0 0.2 1.0 0.7 1.9 1.0 0.2 0.7 1.2

All other sources 21.1 20.1 18.6 19.0 17.0 -2.5 -1.0 -1.5 -2.0

Subtotal, nonsubject *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total, all imports 44.4 51.8 59.7 57.3 64.3 15.4 7.4 7.9 7.0

Value of U.S. imports:

China (subject) *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Nonsubject sources:

China *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Brazil 73,216 98,903 110,647 48,479 63,671 51.1 35.1 11.9 31.3

Indonesia 130,165 151,394 149,487 72,406 87,398 14.8 16.3 -1.3 20.7

Malaysia 44,897 67,979 114,588 50,301 74,802 155.2 51.4 68.6 48.7

Mexico 145,171 127,553 98,227 49,222 44,499 -32.3 -12.1 -23.0 -9.6

Vietnam 860 10,871 45,454 15,924 48,300 5,183.5 1,163.7 318.1 203.3

All other sources 869,420 896,807 867,626 426,596 427,926 -0.2 3.2 -3.3 0.3

Subtotal, nonsubject *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total, all imports 1,829,281 2,311,456 2,787,927 1,287,529 1,618,423 52.4 26.4 20.6 25.7

U.S. producers:’

Average capacity quantity 17,833,664 17,884,974 17,316,172 8,774,426 8,620,708 -2.9 0.3 -3.2 -1.8

Production quantity 13,987,146 13,872,218 12,712,592 6,727,891 6,555,543 -9.1 -0.8 -8.4 -2.6

Capacity utilization1 (percent) 77.2 76.8 72.7 76.1 74.6 -4.5 -0.4 -4.1 -1.5

U.S. shipments (pieces):

Quantity 14,022,078 13,699,797 12,641,093 6,565,378 6,390,617 -9.8 -2.3 -7.7 -2.7

Value 2,294,304 2,150,147 1,878,740 960,833 899,223 -18.1 -6.3 -12.6 -6.4

Unit value $163.62 $156.95 $148.62 $146.35 $140.71 -9.2 -4.1 -5.3 -3.9

Export shipments (pieces):

Quantity 206,088 225,349 249,187 109,568 123,000 20.9 9.3 10.6 12.3

Value 34,856 35,279 34,928 17,423 16,548 0.2 1.2 -1.0 -5.0

Unit value $169.13 $156.55 $140.17 $159.02 $134.54 -17.1 -7.4 -10.5 -15.4

Ending inventory quantity 1,825,553 1,867,947 1,810,686 1,926,629 1,976,361 -0.8 2.3 -3.1 2.6

Inventories/total shipments1 12.8 13.4 14.0 14.4 15.2 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.7

Production workers 32,680 30,107 26,181 27,516 24,352 -19.9 -7.9 -13.0 -11.5

Hours worked (1,000) 61,640 57,838 49,053 27,298 24,823 -20.4 -6.2 -15.2 -9.1

Wages paid ($1,000) 740,273 713,611 624,685 325,169 312,808 -15.6 -3.6 -12.5 -3.8

Hourly wages $12.01 $12.34 $12.73 $11.91 $12.60 6.0 2.7 3.2 5.8

Productivity (pieces/1,000 hours) 223.4 237.5 256.6 244.8 259.3 14.9 6.3 8.0 5.9

Unit labor costs per piece $53.76 $51.94 $49.63 $48.66 $48.60 -7.7 -3.4 -4.5 -0.1

Net sales:

Quantity 13,903,209 13,475,643 12,522,006 6,614,185 6,274,110 -9.9 -3.1 -7.1 -5.1

Value 2,325,701 2,166,170 1,899,142 991,846 912,937 -18.3 -6.9 -12.3 -8.0

Unit value $167.28 $160.75 $151.66 $149.96 $145.51 -9.3 -3.9 -5.7 -3.0

Cost of goods sold (COGS) 1,854,882 1,735,307 1,546,745 803,081 732,103 -16.6 -6.4 -10.9 -8.8

Gross profit or (loss) 470,819 430,863 352,397 188,765 180,834 -25.2 -8.5 -18.2 -4.2

SG&A expenses 361,066 330,203 304,928 158,093 151,665 -15.5 -8.5 -7.7 -4.1

Operating income or (loss) 109,753 100,660 47,469 30,672 29,169 -56.7 -8.3 -52.8 -4.9

Capital expenditures 57,355 38,540 30,382 16,327 11,512 -47.0 -32.8 -21.2 -29.5

Unit COGS $133.41 $128.77 $123.52 $121.42 $116.69 -7.4 -3.5 -4.1 -3.9

Unit SG&A expenses $25.97 $24.50 $24.35 $23.90 $24.17 -6.2 -5.6 -0.6 1.1

Unit operating income or (loss) $7.89 $7.47 $3.79 $4.64 $4.65 -52.0 -5.4 -49.3 0.3

COGS/sales1 79.8 80.1 81.4 81.0 80.2 1.7 0.4 1.3 -0.8

Operating income or (loss)/sales1 4.7 4.6 2.5 3.1 3.2 -2.2 -0.1 -2.1 0.1 1 Reported data are in percent and period changes are in percentage points.

Note: Financial data are reported on a fiscal-year basis and may not necessarily be comparable to data reported on a calendar-year basis. Because of rounding, figures

may not add to the totals shown. Shares are calculated from the unrounded figures. Quantity of imports is not available in official trade statistics for all HTS numbers, so

only value is reported here for imports. 

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires and Commerce data.

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-1

APPENDIX D

SELECTED U.S. PRODUCER DATA

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-3

Table D-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ responses to questions II-6 and II-8 of the U.S. producers’ questionnaire

No. Firm

Question II-6:

Does your firm produce other

products on the same

equipment and machinery used

in the production of wooden

bedroom furniture?1

Question II-8:

Does your firm produce other

products using the same

production and related workers

employed to produce wooden

bedroom furniture?1

Yes No Yes No

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (49) 34 14 35 14 1

 Other items produced on the same production equipment and using the same production and related workers as wooden bedroom

furniture include: dining room, occasional, bookcases, entertainment centers, and upholstery.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-4

Table D-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ production and share of production, by firm and by position taken with respect to the

petition, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

U.S. production (pieces)

Firms supporting the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, support (35) 6,074,809 5,953,715 4,806,498 2,500,442 2,356,341

Firms opposing the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, opposed (9) 7,312,288 7,384,728 7,513,261 4,016,594 3,995,146

Firms taking no position on petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, no position (5) 600,049 533,775 392,833 210,855 204,056

Total (49) 13,987,146 13,872,218 12,712,592 6,727,891 6,555,543

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-5

Table D-2--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ production and share of production, by firm and by position taken with respect to the

petition, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Share of U.S. production (percent)

Firms supporting the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, support (35) 43.4 42.9 37.8 37.2 35.9

Firms opposing the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, opposed (9) 52.3 53.2 59.1 59.7 60.9

Firms taking no position on petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, no position (5) 4.3 3.8 3.1 3.1 3.1

Total (49) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1

 Two firms, Country Craft and Khoury, provided only limited or non-usable data; therefore, these firms are not included in the U.S. producer trade

or employment data. Two other firms, Modern and Thornwood, provided data in the preliminary phase investigation but not in the final phase

investigation.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-6

Table D-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ production and share of production, by firm and by whether firm imported the subject

merchandise from China, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

U.S. production (pieces)

Firms importing from China:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, importing (26) 10,662,770 10,387,888 9,571,305 5,072,991 4,833,479

Firms not importing from China:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, not importing (23) 3,324,376 3,484,330 3,141,287 1,654,900 1,722,064

Total (49) 13,987,146 13,872,218 12,712,592 6,727,891 6,555,543

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-7

Table D-3--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ production and share of production, by firm and by whether firm imported the subject

merchandise from China, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Share of U.S. production (percent)

Firms importing from China:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Total, importing (26) 76.2 74.9 75.3 75.4 73.7

Firms not importing from China:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Total, not importing (23) 23.8 25.1 24.7 24.6 26.3

Total, all (49) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 1

 Two firms, Country Craft and Khoury, provided only limited or non-usable data; therefore, these firms are not included in the U.S. producer trade

or employment data. Two other firms, Modern and Thornwood, provided data in the preliminary phase investigation but not in the final phase

investigation.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-8

Table D-4

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ imports of subject merchandise from China and share of subject imports, by firm and by

position taken with respect to the petition, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Value of reported U.S. imports from China ($1,000)

Firms supporting the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, support (35) 27,123 55,356 92,782 44,781 45,811

Firms opposing the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, opposed (9) 116,438 226,288 266,225 120,429 171,130

Firms taking no position on petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, no position (5) 7,362 18,647 39,113 22,991 22,308

Total (49) 150,923 300,291 398,120 188,200 239,249

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-9

Table D-4--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ imports of subject merchandise from China and share of subject imports, by firm and by

position taken with respect to the petition, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Share of reported value of U.S. imports from China by U.S. producers (percent)

Firms supporting the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, support (35) 18.0 18.4 23.3 23.8 19.1

Firms opposing the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, opposed (9) 77.2 75.4 66.9 64.0 71.5

Firms taking no position on petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, no position (5) 4.9 6.2 9.8 12.2 9.3

Total (49) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

D-10

Table D-4--Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. producers’ imports of subject merchandise from China and share of subject imports, by firm and by

position taken with respect to the petition, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 20041

Item

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Share of reported value of U.S. imports from China (percent)

Firms supporting the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, support (35) 6.1 6.5 8.3 7.9 6.9

Firms opposing the petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, opposed (9) 26.2 26.4 23.7 21.3 25.7

Firms taking no position on petition:

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal, no position (5) 1.7 2.2 3.5 4.1 3.4

Total (49) 33.9 35.1 35.4 33.3 36.0 1

 Two firms, Country Craft and Khoury, provided only limited or non-usable data; therefore, these firms are not included in the U.S. producer trade

or employment data. Two other firms, Modern and Thornwood, provided data in the preliminary phase investigation but not in the final phase

investigation.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to totals shown.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

E-1

APPENDIX E

SELECTED U.S. IMPORTER DATA

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

E-3

Table E-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. importers, import sources, and the quantity (in pieces) and share of U.S. imports from China, by

firms, 2001-03

No. Firm

Import source(s) Reported imports from China

ChinaBrazilIndonesiaMalaysiaMexicoVietnamAll other

2001 2002 2003

Share of

reported

imports

from

China

in 2003

Quantity (pieces) Percent

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (123) 101 30 32 36 19 29 55 3,586,591 6,334,386 7,643,055 100.00

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

E-4

Table E-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. imports based on questionnaire responses, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003,

and January-June 20041

Source

Calendar year January-June

2001 2002 2003 2003 2004

Quantity (pieces)

China1 3,326,551 6,083,138 7,437,461 3,655,470 4,373,729

Brazil 439,118 563,748 662,749 265,043 355,901

Indonesia 403,070 504,549 497,496 240,091 271,317

Malaysia 414,797 595,869 786,471 358,352 384,978

Mexico 889,993 819,681 644,509 355,227 275,133

Vietnam 20 56,771 280,407 115,607 274,215

All other sources 1,869,569 1,992,977 2,630,428 1,271,318 1,490,857

Total 7,343,118 10,616,732 12,939,521 6,261,108 7,426,130

Quantity (pounds)

China1 215,225,940 440,316,557 540,473,652 253,676,054 334,604,694

Brazil 35,773,045 41,692,007 47,137,960 18,364,567 22,142,137

Indonesia 27,000,045 35,486,530 39,607,540 17,088,964 21,687,246

Malaysia 29,812,069 49,513,821 62,300,894 29,574,228 28,229,012

Mexico 37,429,404 40,352,004 32,045,155 15,587,005 13,442,760

Vietnam 0 4,721,683 19,067,096 7,387,649 13,596,856

All other sources 120,612,435 154,700,035 196,618,456 97,132,334 121,080,579

Total 465,852,938 766,782,637 937,250,753 438,810,801 554,783,284

Value ($1,000)2

China1 444,680 856,541 1,124,021 565,799 665,206

Brazil 49,254 63,817 63,462 28,067 36,695

Indonesia 73,808 85,749 93,779 43,383 47,654

Malaysia 40,497 60,443 80,503 39,789 38,074

Mexico 118,811 103,492 66,262 38,376 30,388

Vietnam 8 7,166 46,332 16,814 48,769

All other sources 147,041 169,399 194,972 99,748 109,128

Total 874,099 1,346,606 1,669,331 831,976 975,913

Unit value (per piece)

China1 $133.68 $140.81 $151.13 $154.78 $152.09

Brazil 112.17 113.20 95.76 105.90 103.10

Indonesia 183.11 169.95 188.50 180.69 175.64

Malaysia 97.63 101.44 102.36 111.03 98.90

Mexico 133.50 126.26 102.81 108.03 110.45

Vietnam 400.00 126.23 165.23 145.44 177.85

All other sources 78.65 85.00 74.12 78.46 73.20

Average 119.04 126.84 129.01 132.88 131.42

Unit value (per pound)

China1 $1.22 $1.26 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34

Brazil 1.11 1.15 1.02 1.11 1.12

Indonesia 1.80 1.56 1.67 1.59 1.58

Malaysia 1.03 0.97 0.89 0.95 0.92

Mexico 1.65 1.50 1.20 1.31 1.33

Vietnam (2

) 1.10 1.20 1.17 1.44

All other sources 0.88 0.81 0.74 0.77 0.69

Average 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18

Table continued. See footnotes at end of table.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

E-5

Table E-2–Continued

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. imports based on questionnaire responses, by sources, 2001-03, January-June 2003,

and January-June 20041

Source

Calendar year January-June

2000 2001 2002 2002 2003

Share of quantity (percent of pieces)

China1 45.3 57.3 57.5 58.4 58.9

Brazil 6.0 5.3 5.1 4.2 4.8

Indonesia 5.5 4.8 3.8 3.8 3.7

Malaysia 5.6 5.6 6.1 5.7 5.2

Mexico 12.1 7.7 5.0 5.7 3.7

Vietnam 0.0 0.5 2.2 1.8 3.7

All other sources 25.5 18.8 20.3 20.3 20.1

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Share of quantity (percent of pounds)

China1 46.2 57.4 57.7 57.8 60.3

Brazil 7.7 5.4 5.0 4.2 4.0

Indonesia 5.8 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.9

Malaysia 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 5.1

Mexico 8.0 5.3 3.4 3.6 2.4

Vietnam 0.0 0.6 2.0 1.7 2.5

All other sources 25.9 20.2 21.0 22.1 21.8

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Share of value (percent)

China1 50.9 63.6 67.3 68.0 68.2

Brazil 5.6 4.7 3.8 3.4 3.8

Indonesia 8.4 6.4 5.6 5.2 4.9

Malaysia 4.6 4.5 4.8 4.8 3.9

Mexico 13.6 7.7 4.0 4.6 3.1

Vietnam 0.0 0.5 2.8 2.0 5.0

All other sources 16.8 12.6 11.7 12.0 11.2

Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Ratio of imports to U.S. production quantity (pieces)

China1 23.8 43.9 58.5 54.3 66.7

Brazil 3.1 4.1 5.2 3.9 5.4

Indonesia 2.9 3.6 3.9 3.6 4.1

Malaysia 3.0 4.3 6.2 5.3 5.9

Mexico 6.4 5.9 5.1 5.3 4.2

Vietnam 0.0 0.4 2.2 1.7 4.2

All other sources 13.4 14.4 20.7 18.9 22.7

Total 52.5 76.5 101.8 93.1 113.3

Ratio of imports to U.S. production quantity (pounds)

China1 18.7 37.8 50.3 45.2 60.2

Brazil 3.1 3.6 4.4 3.3 4.0

Indonesia 2.3 3.0 3.7 3.0 3.9

Malaysia 2.6 4.2 5.8 5.3 5.1

Mexico 3.3 3.5 3.0 2.8 2.4

Vietnam (2

) 0.4 1.8 1.3 2.4

All other sources 10.5 13.3 18.3 17.3 21.8

Total 40.5 65.7 87.3 78.2 99.7

1

 Includes imports produced and exported by the de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin. As a share of official import

statistics, U.S. producers accounted for 26.7 percent of imports from China in 2001, 31.3 percent in 2002, 28.4 percent in 2003,

30.1 percent in January-June 2003, and 27.4 percent in January-June 2004 (see table IV-1 and table D-4). 2

 Not applicable.

Note: Because of rounding, figures may not add to the totals shown.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

E-6

Table E-3

Wooden bedroom furniture: Top 10 U.S. importers, U.S. imports, largest U.S. customers, and source of imports

produced in China, 2001-03, January-June 2003, and January-June 2004

Firm1 2001 2002 2003 2001-03

Largest U.S.

customers2

Producer

sources

in China

Quantity of reported imports (pieces)

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal (10) 1,751,281 2,871,829 3,359,909 7,983,019 *** ***

Total imports 3,326,551 6,083,138 7,437,461 16,847,150 *** ***

Share of reported imports (percent)

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Subtotal 52.6 47.2 45.2 47.4 *** ***

1

 ***.

2

 ***.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

F-1

APPENDIX F

SELECTED U.S. PURCHASER DATA

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

F-3

Table F-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: U.S. purchasers, whether firms are U.S. producers or U.S. importers, and purchases in 2003, by

firms and by sources, January 2001-June 2004

No. Firm

U.S.

producer

U.S.

importer

Purchases in 2003

Domestically

produced

Imports

from China

Value Share Value Share

U = Yes U = Yes $1,000 Percent $1,000 Percent

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (98) 20 50 361,593 100.0 510,228 100.0

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

F-4

Table F-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Top 10 reporting U.S. purchasers of domestically produced and subject

merchandise, and each purchaser’s largest suppliers, 2003

Firm

Reported purchases

$1,000 Largest suppliers

Domestically produced:

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

Subtotal (10) 217,963

Imported from China:

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

*** *** ***

Subtotal (10) 308,346

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

G-1

APPENDIX G

SELECTED FOREIGN PRODUCER DATA

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

G-3

Table G-1

Wooden bedroom furniture: Producers in China, firms’ largest U.S. customers in 2003, final dumping margins, exports to the

United States during 2001-03, and share of exports to the United States in 2003

No. Firm

Largest U.S.

customers

in 2003

Final

dumping

margin

Exports to the United States

2001 2002 2003

Share 

of 2003

exports

Percent

ad valorem Quantity (pieces) Percent

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (153)1 2,872,363 5,290,863 7,095,949 100.00

1

 Excludes the data of de minimis-margin firm Markor Tianjin.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

G-4

Table G-2

Wooden bedroom furniture: Producers in China, the year of first exports to the United States, and firms’ responses to questions

II-8 and II-9 of the foreign producers’ questionnaire

No. Firm

Year of

first

exports

to U.S.

Question II-8:

Have any U.S. producers of

wooden bedroom furniture

purchased wooden bedroom

furniture from your firm?

Question II-9:

Did any U.S. producer help your

firm develop capacity to produce

and export wooden bedroom

furniture to the United States?

No Yes List of firms No Yes List of firms

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (154)1 111 42 132 21

1

 ***.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

G-5

Table G-3 

Wooden bedroom furniture: Chinese producers’ responses to questions II-11 and II-12 of the foreign producers’ questionnaire

No. Firm

Question II-11:

Has your firm exported joinery

wooden bedroom furniture to the

United States since January 1, 2001?

Question II-12:

Has you firm exported hospitality

or institutional wooden bedroom

furniture to the United States

since January 1, 2001?

No Yes Comment No Yes Comment

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

*** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Total (154)1 147 6 140 13

1

 ***.

Source: Compiled from data submitted in response to Commission questionnaires.

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

H-1

APPENDIX H

SELECTED COMMENTS OF

U.S. PRODUCERS AND U.S. PURCHASERS

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

H-3

COMMENTS OF U.S. PRODUCERS

Reasons For Importing Wooden Bedroom Furniture

U.S. producers that imported wooden bedroom furniture were asked to respond to the following

question:

If your firm also produces wooden bedroom furniture in the United States, please

indicate your reasons for importing this product. If your reasons differ by source,

please elaborate. (Question II-3 of importers’ questionnaire)

Twenty-six U.S. producers imported the subject merchandise from China. All 26 firms

responded to this question, and their comments are as follows:

*******

Relationships Affected by Support of the Petition

Each U.S. producer was asked whether any of its customers communicated to anyone in the firm

either orally, in writing, or by email that the firm’s support for the petition would affect the customer’s

relationship with the firm or would affect the customer’s purchases of wooden bedroom furniture from

the firm. Twelve producers responded “Yes” and 32 producers responded “No.”

The number of U.S. producers answering the following question is shown in the tabulation

below:

Have any of your customers communicated to anyone in your firm either orally, in

writing, or by e-mail that your support for the petition would affect its relationship

with your firm or their purchases of wooden bedroom furniture from your firm

(Question II-21)?

Item Number of firms

Responded “No” 32 

Responded “Yes” (see their comments below) 12 

Note: Several firms did not respond to this question.

Other comments to this question are as follows:

*******
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 1 See responses to question I-6 of the purchasers’ questionnaire.

H-4

Reduced Purchases Because of Support For Petition

Each U.S. producer was also requested to indicate whether any of its customers reduced their

purchases of furniture from it because of its support for the petition. Nine producers indicated “Yes” and

29 producers indicated “No.”

The number of U.S. producers answering the following question is shown in the tabulation

below:

If your firm supports the petition, have any of your customers reduced purchases of

furniture from your firm because {of} your firm’s support of the petition (Question

II-22)?

Item Number of firms

Responded “No” 29 

Responded “Yes” (see their comments below) 9 

Note: Several firms did not respond to this question.

Comments to this question are as follows:

*******

COMMENTS OF U.S. PURCHASERS

Relationships Affected by Support of the Petition

Likewise, purchasers were asked whether anyone in their firm had communicated, either orally,

in writing, or by email, to any domestic producer of wooden bedroom furniture that its support for the

petition would affect the producer’s relationship with the purchaser or would affect the purchaser’s

purchases from that producer. Three purchasers (***) responded “Yes” and 85 purchasers responded

“No.”1

*** reported that it had communicated verbally to the sales representatives of firms from which it

was buying at the time of the petition. Narrative responses of *** and *** are unclear what, if anything,

they communicated. *** stated that an article in Furniture Today reported that this was happening, but

that to its knowledge no action had been taken against those supporting the petition. *** merely

responded that choosing sides in making wood furniture is less of a value for the final consumer. 
Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

 2 See responses to question I-7 of the purchasers’ questionnaire.

H-5

Reduced Purchases Because of Support For Petition

Likewise, purchasers were asked whether they decreased purchases of wooden bedroom furniture from

any domestic producer because of that producer’s support for the petition. Two purchasers (***)

responded “Yes” and 89 purchasers responded “No.”2

*** stated that in October 2003 it decreased purchases from ***. *** reported that it decreased

purchases with ***.

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-1

APPENDIX I

ALLEGED EFFECTS OF IMPORTS ON U.S. PRODUCERS’

EXISTING DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION EFFORTS,

GROWTH, INVESTMENT, ABILITY TO RAISE CAPITAL,

OR THE SCALE OF CAPITAL INVESTMENTS

Inv. No. 731-TA-1058 (Final) Wooden Bedroom Furniture

I-3

The number of U.S. producers answering the following question are shown in the tabulation

below:

Since January 1, 2001, has your firm experienced any actual negative effects on its

return on investment or its growth, investment, ability to raise capital, existing

development and production efforts (including efforts to develop a derivative or

more advanced version of the product), or the scale of capital investments as a result

of imports of wooden bedroom furniture from China (Question III-11)?

Item Number of firms

No 9 

1-Cancellation, postponement, or rejection of expansion projects 16 

2–Denial or rejection of investment proposal 8 

3–Reduction in the size of capital investments 21 

4–Rejection of bank loans 6 

5–Lowering of credit rating 5 

6–Problem related to the issue of stocks or bonds 2 

7–Closing of plants 14 

8–Write-offs or write-downs of property, plant, & equipment 16 

Other comments to this question are as follows:

*******

The number of U.S. producers answering the following question are shown in the tabulation, and

their comments are also presented below:

Does your firm anticipate any negative impact of imports of wooden bedroom

furniture from China (Question III-12)?

Item Number of firms

No 6 

Yes (see their comments below) 37 

Comments to this question are as follows:

*******