Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 35951 

regulated area will at all times remain 

approximately 50 yards offshore of the 

island of Key West, Florida; extend 50 

yards in front of the lead safety vessel 

preceding the first race participants; 

extend 50 yards behind the safety vessel 

trailing the last race participants; and at 

all times extend 100 yards on either side 

of the race participants and safety 

vessels. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, State, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Key West in the 

enforcement of the regulated area. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels, except authorized race 

participants or safety vessels, are 

prohibited from entering, transiting 

through, anchoring in, or remaining 

within the race area. Persons and 

vessels desiring to enter, transit through, 

anchor in, or remain within the race 

area, may contact the Captain of the Port 

Key West by telephone at (305) 292– 

8727, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16, to request 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

with the race area, is granted by the 

Captain of the Port Key West or a 

designated representative. 

(2) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated area by Marine 

Safety Information Bulletins, Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement Date. This rule will 

be enforced from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 

June 28, 2014. 

Dated: June 2, 2014. 

A.S. Young, Sr., 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Key West. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14652 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[ED–2014–OSERS 0043] 

Final Priority; National Institute on 

Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research—Rehabilitation Research 

and Training Centers 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Final priority. 

[CFDA Number: 84.133B–3.] 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services announces a priority for the 

Rehabilitation Research and Training 

Center (RRTC) Program administered by 

the National Institute on Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). 

Specifically, we announce a priority for 

an RRTC on Employment for 

Individuals with Intellectual and 

Developmental Disabilities. The 

Assistant Secretary may use this priority 

for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2014 

and later years. We take this action to 

focus research attention on areas of 

national need. We intend for this 

priority to contribute to improved 

employment outcomes of individuals 

with intellectual and developmental 

disabilities. 

DATES: Effective Date: This priority is 

effective July 25, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Barrett, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

Room 5142, Potomac Center Plaza 

(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700. 

Telephone: (202) 245–6211 or by email: 

patricia.barrett@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose of Program: The purpose of 

the Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research Projects and Centers Program 

is to plan and conduct research, 

demonstration projects, training, and 

related activities, including 

international activities, to develop 

methods, procedures, and rehabilitation 

technology that maximize the full 

inclusion and integration into society, 

employment, independent living, family 

support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with 

disabilities, especially individuals with 

the most severe disabilities, and to 

improve the effectiveness of services 

authorized under the Rehabilitation Act 

of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation 

Act). 

Rehabilitation Research and Training 

Centers 

The purpose of the RRTCs, which are 

funded through the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Program, is to achieve the goals 

of, and improve the effectiveness of, 

services authorized under the 

Rehabilitation Act through welldesigned research, training, technical 

assistance, and dissemination activities 

in important topical areas. These 

activities are designed to benefit 

rehabilitation service providers, 

individuals with disabilities, family 

members, policymakers, and other 

research stakeholders. Additional 

information on the RRTC program can 

be found at: http://www2.ed.gov/

programs/rrtc/index.html. 

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 

764(b)(2). 

Applicable Program Regulations: 34 

CFR part 350. 

We published a notice of proposed 

priority (NPP) for this program in the 

Federal Register on March 3, 2014 (79 

FR 11742). That notice contained 

background information and our reasons 

for proposing the particular priority. 

Except for one revision explained in 

the Analysis of Comments and Changes 

section, there are no differences 

between the proposed priority and this 

final priority. 

Public Comment: In response to our 

invitation in the NPP, three parties 

submitted comments on the proposed 

priority. 

Generally, we do not address 

technical and other minor changes. 

Analysis of Comments and Changes: 

An analysis of the comments and of any 

changes in the priority since publication 

of the notice of proposed priority 

follows. 

Comment: One commenter questioned 

the need for this priority. Specifically, 

the commenter believed that with the 

current Federal budget restraints, we 

should not be spending money on any 

type of research. 

Discussion: The proposed RRTC on 

Employment for Individuals with 

Intellectual and Developmental 

Disabilities is consistent with the 

research agenda outlined in NIDRR’s 

Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 2013– 

2017 (Plan), which was published in the 

Federal Register on April 4, 2013 (78 FR 

20299). One of the goals of the Plan is 

to establish a balanced distribution of 

priorities focused on improved 

outcomes in the domains of 

employment, community living and 

participation, and health and function 

that address the needs of individuals 

with different disabilities, personal 

characteristics, and social 

circumstances. NIDRR believes that the 

proposed RRTC on Employment for 

Individuals with Intellectual and 

Developmental Disabilities is consistent 

with that goal and will help to improve 

outcomes for this population. 

More specifically, as we discussed in 

the NPP, there is a need to increase 

knowledge about effective ways to 

prepare persons with intellectual and 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
35952 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

1See www.dol.gov/odep/categories/workforce/

CustomizedEmployment/what/ for more 

information about customized employment. 

developmental disabilities in their 

homes, schools, and communities for 

competitive integrated work; effectively 

bundle individual practices and 

experiences associated with desirable 

employment outcomes into more 

effective programs of employment 

supports; and scale up effective 

practices and programs to provide 

substantially increased opportunities for 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities to experience 

well-developed, effective employment 

support. We believe this priority will 

focus research attention on this area of 

national need. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: One commenter stated that 

individuals with the most severe 

intellectual and developmental 

disabilities are often assumed to be 

unable to work, and therefore not 

included in research that could impact 

future employment supports and 

outcomes for this population. The 

commenter also suggested that 

‘‘customized employment’’ 1 could hold 

promise for improving employment 

outcomes for individuals with the most 

severe intellectual and developmental 

disabilities. The commenter 

recommended that we revise the 

priority to encourage RRTCs to include 

individuals with the most severe 

intellectual and developmental 

disabilities in its activities. 

Discussion: NIDRR agrees with the 

commenter that research and related 

activities are needed to improve 

employment outcomes for individuals 

with disabilities, especially individuals 

with the most severe disabilities. 

However, we do not want to limit 

applicants’ choices by specifying or 

recommending the severity of disability 

for their target population. The priority 

language allows applicants to focus 

their research and related activities on 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities as a group, or 

on specific subpopulations. With this 

field-initiated priority, we purposefully 

allow researchers to specify and justify 

their target population. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: One commenter suggested 

that NIDRR modify the priority to 

require the involvement of directors of 

State vocational rehabilitation agencies 

in the RRTC’s activities. 

Discussion: Paragraph (c)(iv) of the 

priority requires the RRTC to contribute 

to improving employment outcomes by 

involving key stakeholder groups in its 

research activities. The priority does not 

require that any particular stakeholder 

group be involved in its activities 

because the most critical stakeholders 

may vary depending on the specific 

activity proposed. However, 

representatives of State VR agencies are 

listed as an example of a key 

stakeholder. In addition, nothing in the 

priority precludes an applicant from 

proposing the participation and 

involvement of State VR agency 

directors in their RRTC activities. The 

peer review process will determine the 

merits of each proposal. 

Changes: None. 

Comment: None. 

Discussion: After further review, we 

believe that it would strengthen this 

priority to highlight in this priority the 

importance of employment of 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities in integrated 

competitive settings. This concept is 

introduced in the background section of 

the NPP, published in the Federal 

Register on March 3, 2014 (79 FR 

11742). Specifically, the NPP 

introduced data showing that, of 

566,188 individuals with intellectual 

and developmental disabilities in 

integrated employment, sheltered 

employment, and non-work settings in 

2010, only 19 percent were in 

integrated, competitive employment. 

For this reason, we want to make even 

clearer our belief that individuals with 

intellectual and developmental 

disabilities have a right to earn a real 

wage (at least minimum wage) in an 

environment where there are people 

with and without disability. 

Changes: We have added integrated, 

competitive employment to the 

overarching purpose statement in the 

introductory language of the priority. 

Final Priority 

The Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

establishes a priority for an RRTC on 

Employment for Individuals with 

Intellectual and Developmental 

Disabilities. 

The RRTC must contribute to 

improving the employment outcomes, 

particularly in integrated, competitive 

employment settings, of individuals 

with intellectual and developmental 

disabilities by: 

(a) Conducting well-designed research 

activities in one or more of the 

following priority areas, focusing on 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities as a group or 

on individuals in specific disability or 

demographic subpopulations of 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities: 

(i) Technology to improve 

employment outcomes for individuals 

with intellectual and developmental 

disabilities. 

(ii) Individual, work environment, or 

employer factors associated with 

improved employment opportunities or 

outcomes for individuals with 

intellectual and developmental 

disabilities. 

(iii) Interventions that contribute to 

improved employment outcomes for 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities. 

Interventions include any one or 

combination of the following: Strategies, 

practices, programs, policies, or tools 

that, when implemented as intended, 

contribute to improvements in 

opportunities or outcomes for 

individuals with disabilities, and may 

include interventions focused on 

individuals, families, employers, or 

service providers. 

(iv) Effects of current or modified 

government practices, policies, and 

programs on employment outcomes for 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities. 

(v) Practices and policies that 

contribute to improved employment 

outcomes for transition-aged youth with 

intellectual and developmental 

disabilities. 

(b) Identifying and focusing its 

research on one or more specific stages 

of research, including specifically at 

least one significant evaluation project 

focused on scaling up existing validated 

employment interventions or programs 

to multiple employment settings. If the 

RRTC is to conduct research that can be 

categorized under more than one of the 

research stages, or research that 

progresses from one stage to another, 

those stages should be clearly specified. 

These stages and their definitions are in 

the notice of final priorities and 

definitions published in the Federal 

Register on May 7, 2013 (78 FR 26513). 

(c) Serving as a national resource 

center related to employment for 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities, their 

families, and other stakeholders by 

conducting knowledge translation 

activities that include, but are not 

limited to: 

(i) Providing information and 

technical assistance on job development 

and placement, job training and 

support, customized employment, and 

other aspects of supported employment 

to school-based transition programs, 

employment service providers, 

employers, individuals with intellectual 

and developmental disabilities and their 

representatives, and other key 

stakeholders. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 35953 

(ii) Providing training, including 

graduate, pre-service, and in-service 

training, to vocational rehabilitation, 

school-based transition programs, and 

other employment service providers, to 

achieve integrated, competitive 

employment outcomes for individuals 

with intellectual and developmental 

disabilities. This training may be 

provided through conferences, 

workshops, public education programs, 

in-service training programs, and 

similar activities. 

(iii) Disseminating, in accessible 

formats, research-based information and 

materials related to employment for 

individuals with intellectual and 

developmental disabilities. 

(iv) Involving key stakeholder groups 

in the activities conducted under 

paragraph (a) in order to maximize the 

relevance and usability of the new 

knowledge generated by the RRTC. Such 

stakeholder groups may vary depending 

on the specific activity proposed, but 

could include representatives of 

agencies such as the State 

Developmental Disabilities program/

service agencies, State Developmental 

Disability Planning Councils, State 

Protection and Advocacy Agencies, 

State vocational rehabilitation agencies, 

and State Employment First coalitions, 

as well as consumer advocacy agencies 

such as The Arc, UCP, TASH, and 

People First. 

Types of Priorities 

When inviting applications for a 

competition using one or more 

priorities, we designate the type of each 

priority as absolute, competitive 

preference, or invitational through a 

notice in the Federal Register. The 

effect of each type of priority follows: 

Absolute priority: Under an absolute 

priority, we consider only applications 

that meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(3)). 

Competitive preference priority: 

Under a competitive preference priority, 

we give competitive preference to an 

application by (1) awarding additional 

points, depending on the extent to 

which the application meets the priority 

(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting 

an application that meets the priority 

over an application of comparable merit 

that does not meet the priority (34 CFR 

75.105(c)(2)(ii)). 

Invitational priority: Under an 

invitational priority, we are particularly 

interested in applications that meet the 

priority. However, we do not give an 

application that meets the priority a 

preference over other applications (34 

CFR 75.105(c)(1)). 

This notice does not preclude us from 

proposing additional priorities, 

requirements, definitions, or selection 

criteria, subject to meeting applicable 

rulemaking requirements. 

Note: This notice does not solicit 

applications. In any year in which we choose 

to use this priority, we invite applications 

through a notice in the Federal Register. 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

Regulatory Impact Analysis 

Under Executive Order 12866, the 

Secretary must determine whether this 

regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and, 

therefore, subject to the requirements of 

the Executive order and subject to 

review by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive 

Order 12866 defines a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ as an action likely to 

result in a rule that may— 

(1) Have an annual effect on the 

economy of $100 million or more, or 

adversely affect a sector of the economy, 

productivity, competition, jobs, the 

environment, public health or safety, or 

State, local, or tribal governments or 

communities in a material way (also 

referred to as an ‘‘economically 

significant’’ rule); 

(2) Create serious inconsistency or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency; 

(3) Materially alter the budgetary 

impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, 

or loan programs or the rights and 

obligations of recipients thereof; or 

(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues 

arising out of legal mandates, the 

President’s priorities, or the principles 

stated in the Executive order. 

This final regulatory action is not a 

significant regulatory action subject to 

review by OMB under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866. 

We have also reviewed this final 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

13563, which supplements and 

explicitly reaffirms the principles, 

structures, and definitions governing 

regulatory review established in 

Executive Order 12866. To the extent 

permitted by law, Executive Order 

13563 requires that an agency— 

(1) Propose or adopt regulations only 

upon a reasoned determination that 

their benefits justify their costs 

(recognizing that some benefits and 

costs are difficult to quantify); 

(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the 

least burden on society, consistent with 

obtaining regulatory objectives and 

taking into account—among other things 

and to the extent practicable—the costs 

of cumulative regulations; 

(3) In choosing among alternative 

regulatory approaches, select those 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety, 

and other advantages; distributive 

impacts; and equity); 

(4) To the extent feasible, specify 

performance objectives, rather than the 

behavior or manner of compliance a 

regulated entity must adopt; and 

(5) Identify and assess available 

alternatives to direct regulation, 

including economic incentives—such as 

user fees or marketable permits—to 

encourage the desired behavior, or 

provide information that enables the 

public to make choices. 

Executive Order 13563 also requires 

an agency ‘‘to use the best available 

techniques to quantify anticipated 

present and future benefits and costs as 

accurately as possible.’’ The Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs of 

OMB has emphasized that these 

techniques may include ‘‘identifying 

changing future compliance costs that 

might result from technological 

innovation or anticipated behavioral 

changes.’’ 

We are issuing this final priority only 

on a reasoned determination that its 

benefits justify its costs. In choosing 

among alternative regulatory 

approaches, we selected those 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

Based on the analysis that follows, the 

Department believes that this regulatory 

action is consistent with the principles 

in Executive Order 13563. 

We also have determined that this 

regulatory action does not unduly 

interfere with State, local, and tribal 

governments in the exercise of their 

governmental functions. 

In accordance with both Executive 

orders, the Department has assessed the 

potential costs and benefits, both 

quantitative and qualitative, of this 

regulatory action. The potential costs 

are those resulting from statutory 

requirements and those we have 

determined as necessary for 

administering the Department’s 

programs and activities. 

The benefits of the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Program have been well 

established over the years, as projects 

similar to the one envisioned by the 

final priority have been completed 

successfully. The new RRTC will 

generate and promote the use of new 

knowledge that likely will improve the 

employment outcomes for individuals 

with disabilities. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 

request to the program contact person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
35954 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 122 / Wednesday, June 25, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: June 20, 2014. 

Michael K. Yudin, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–14899 Filed 6–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[Docket ID ED–2014–OSERS–0022] 

Final Priority; National Institute on 

Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research—Rehabilitation Research 

and Training Centers 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and 

Rehabilitative Services, Department of 

Education. 

ACTION: Final priority. 

[CFDA Number: 84.133B–5.] 

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for 

Special Education and Rehabilitative 

Services announces a priority under the 

Rehabilitation Research and Training 

Center (RRTC) Program administered by 

the National Institute on Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). 

Specifically, this notice announces a 

priority for an RRTC on Improving 

Employment Outcomes for Individuals 

with Psychiatric Disabilities. We take 

this action to focus research attention on 

an area of national need. We intend this 

priority to contribute to improved 

employment outcomes for individuals 

with psychiatric disabilities. 

DATES: Effective Date: This priority is 

effective July 25, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Barrett, U.S. Department of 

Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., 

Room 5142, Potomac Center Plaza 

(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–2700. 

Telephone: (202) 245–6211 or by email: 

patricia.barrett@ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 

telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay 

Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 

8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Purpose of Program: The purpose of 

the Disability and Rehabilitation 

Research Projects and Centers Program 

is to plan and conduct research, 

demonstration projects, training, and 

related activities, including 

international activities, to develop 

methods, procedures, and rehabilitation 

technology that maximize the full 

inclusion and integration into society, 

employment, independent living, family 

support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with 

disabilities, especially individuals with 

the most severe disabilities, and to 

improve the effectiveness of services 

authorized under the Rehabilitation Act 

of 1973, as amended (Rehabilitation 

Act). 

Rehabilitation Research and Training 

Centers 

The purpose of the RRTCs, which are 

funded through the Disability and 

Rehabilitation Research Projects and 

Centers Program, is to achieve the goals 

of, and improve the effectiveness of, 

services authorized under the 

Rehabilitation Act through welldesigned research, training, technical 

assistance, and dissemination activities 

in important topical areas, as specified 

by NIDRR. These activities are designed 

to benefit rehabilitation service 

providers, individuals with disabilities, 

family members, policymakers, and 

other research stakeholders. Additional 

information on the RRTC program can 

be found at: http://www2.ed.gov/

programs/rrtc/index.html#types. 

Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 762(g) and 

764(b)(2). 

Applicable Program Regulations: 34 

CFR part 350. 

We published a notice of proposed 

priority for this program in the Federal 

Register on Wednesday, March 26, 2014 

(79 FR 16707). That notice contained 

background information and our reasons 

for proposing the particular priority. 

There are no differences between the 

proposed priority and this final priority 

as discussed in the Analysis of 

Comments and Changes section 

elsewhere in this notice. 

Public Comment: In response to our 

invitation in the notice of proposed 

priority, four parties submitted 

comments on the proposed priority. 

Generally, we do not address 

technical and other minor changes. In 

addition, we do not address the general 

comments we received that raised 

concerns not directly related to the 

proposed priority. 

Analysis of Comments and Changes: 

An analysis of the comments and of any 

changes in the priority since publication 

of the notice of proposed priority 

follows. 

Comment: Two commenters suggested 

that NIDRR modify the priority to 

require a focus on promising practices 

that could enhance employment 

outcomes for individuals with 

psychiatric disabilities and serve as the 

basis for research by the RRTC. One 

commenter suggested that NIDRR 

modify the priority to focus on 

psychiatric treatment programs that 

emphasize timely intervention 

following an initial psychiatric episode, 

as well as supported education 

programs for youth and young adults 

with psychiatric disabilities. The other 

commenter suggested that NIDRR 

modify the priority to focus on 

educational and supported housing 

interventions for adults with psychiatric 

disabilities, as well as early screening 

and assessment programs to identify 

children with psychiatric disabilities 

while they are in school. 

Discussion: Nothing in the priority 

precludes applicants from focusing on 

the topics described by the commenters. 

However, we do not wish to preclude 

applicants from proposing other areas of 

research by requiring all applicants to 

address the topics presented by the 

commenters. The peer review process 

will determine the merits of each 

proposal. 

Changes: None. 

Final Priority 

The Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

establishes a priority for an RRTC on 

Improving Employment Outcomes for 

Individuals with Psychiatric 

Disabilities. This priority will be jointly 

funded by NIDRR and the Substance 

Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration (SAMHSA). For the 

purposes of this priority, ‘‘employment 

outcomes’’ may refer to, but are not 

limited to, obtaining employment, job 

retention, job advancement, or 

compensation. 

The RRTC must contribute to 

improving the employment outcomes of 

individuals with psychiatric disabilities 

by: 

(a) Conducting well-designed research 

activities, with an emphasis on 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES