alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 241 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 241

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
         for the relief of victims of the Indian Ocean tsunami.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

Mr. Thomas (for himself and Mr. Rangel) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

                            January 6, 2005

 The Committee on Ways and Means discharged; which was considered and 
                                 passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash contributions 
         for the relief of victims of the Indian Ocean tsunami.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR CHARITABLE CASH 
              CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RELIEF OF INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI VICTIMS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any contribution described 
in subsection (b) made in January 2005 as if such contribution was made 
on December 31, 2004, and not in January 2005.
    (b) Contribution Described.--A contribution is described in this 
subsection if such contribution is a cash contribution made for the 
relief of victims in areas affected by the December 26, 2004, Indian 
Ocean tsunami for which a charitable contribution deduction is 
allowable under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2806

To reduce temporarily the duty on Paraquat Dichloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on Paraquat Dichloride.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PARAQUAT DICHLORIDE. 

4 (a) CALENDAR YEAR 2006.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 

6 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

7 States is amended by inserting in numerical se8 quence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.09.12 Paraquat Dichloride 

(1,1’dimethyl-4,4’-

bipyridinium dichloride) 

(CAS No. 1910–42–5) (provided for in subheading 

2933.39.23) ......................... 3.59% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•HR 2806 IH 

1 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

2 by paragraph (1) applies to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

5 (b) CALENDAR YEAR 2007.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.09.12 of the 

7 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as 

8 added by subsection (a), is amended—

9 (A) by striking ‘‘3.59%’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘4.02%’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘On or before 12/31/2006’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2007’’. 

13 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

14 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on January 1, 

15 2007. 

16 (c) CALENDAR YEAR 2008.—

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.09.11 of the 

18 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as 

19 added by subsection (a) and amended by this sec20 tion, is further amended—

21 (A) by striking ‘‘4.02%’’ and inserting 

22 ‘‘4.41%’’; and 

23 (B) by striking ‘‘On or before 12/31/2007’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2008’’. 
3

•HR 2806 IH 

1 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

2 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on January 1, 

3 2008.

Æ
### §432. Entry under homestead laws generally

Public lands which it is proposed to irrigate by means of any contemplated works shall be subject to entry only under the provisions of the homestead laws, and shall be subject to the limitations, charges, terms, and conditions herein provided: Provided, That the commutation provisions of the homestead laws shall not apply to entries made under this Act.

(June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, §3, 32 Stat. 388.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of part of section 3 of act June 17, 1902. Remainder of section 3 is classified to sections 416 and 434 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Section as Unaffected by Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of this title.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012

US Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. is requesting an extension to the exemption from Title 14 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations part 137.53(c)(2). This exemption is based on being in the public’s best interest to not 

jettison spray loads over congested areas and the ability to show an equivalent level of safety with not 

installing a jettison system. 

Thank you very much for your attention to this. If you need any additional information, or have any 

questions, please feel free to contact me. 

Sincerely,

Michael O. Rosolina

Flight Operations Manager – Aerial Application

Dynamic Aviation Group, Inc. 

P.O. Box 7

Bridgewater, VA 22812

Phone: (540) 828-6070

Fax: (540) 828-4031

mrosolina@dynamicaviation.com
### §641a. Issuance of quitclaim deeds; patents for segregated lands

The Secretary of the Interior shall issue quitclaim deeds to the public-land States for all lands patented to such States under section 641 of this title. He shall also issue a patent for all unpatented public lands within each State now segregated under that section for which the State issued final certificates or other evidence of right prior to June 1, 1953, or as to which equitable claims to the lands accrued prior to that date (by reason of cultivation or improvement of the lands for agricultural development purposes) for conveyance to the holders of such rights or claims, or to their heirs, successors, or assigns.

(Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 727, §1, 68 Stat. 703.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAMIAN G. BEY, a/k/a Damien Giovanni Bey, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:03-cr-00252-BR-l)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damian G. Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Jude Darrow, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Damian G. Bey seeks to appeal the denial of his motions to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion and to withdraw his guilty plea. In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on March 24, 2008 and reaffirmed its previous denial on July 14, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on October 22, 2008. * Because Bey failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H E R M A N S U R JA D I, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 75119 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 659- 899 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t23, 2010 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , H A W K IN S , an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H e rm an S ur

j a di , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED SEP 07 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 75119 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 3 2 1 F . 3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng S urj adi ’ s m ot i on t o reopen a s u n tim e lyw h e r e it w a s f ile do v e rf

iv e y e ar s a f

te rth e B I A ’s f

in a l o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , an dS u r ja d i f a ile dto e s tab lis h c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d o n e s iato qu a lif

yf o rth e r e g u la to rye x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim ita tio n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; se e T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 53 8 F . 3d 98 8, 99 6 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) ( e v id e n c e m u s t d e m o n s tr a te p r im af a c ie e lig ib ilityf

o rr e lie f in o r d e rto re op en proceedi ng s bas ed on changed cou ntrycond i t i on s) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2925 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 324
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2925

                          [Report No. 109-568]

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
              extend the authority for drought assistance.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2005

  Mr. Hinojosa (for himself, Mr. Otter, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Simpson, Mr. 
   Grijalva, Mr. Udall of Colorado, and Mr. Doggett) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

                             July 17, 2006

    Additional sponsors: Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Hastings of 
                     Washington, and Miss McMorris

                             July 17, 2006

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
 [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 
                               15, 2005]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
              extend the authority for drought assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE RECLAMATION STATES EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF 
              ACT OF 1991.

    The Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 
U.S.C. 2210 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 104(c), by striking ``September 30, 2005'' 
        and inserting ``September 30, 2010''; and
            (2) in section 301, by striking ``fiscal years 1992, 1993, 
        1994, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004'' and 
        inserting ``the period of fiscal years 2006 through 2010''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 324

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2925

                          [Report No. 109-568]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
              extend the authority for drought assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 17, 2006

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed`
§ 245.105 Recognition of tenant organizations. Owners of multifamily housing projects covered under § 245.10, and their agents, must: ( a ) Recognize legitimate tenant organizations; and
( b ) Give reasonable consideration to concerns raised by legitimate tenant organizations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sarah Patterson, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–471 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES 

DECEMBER 4, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. WELCH, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 839] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 839, by a record vote of 8–2, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolutions 

reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 

providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill 

(H.R. 6) to reduce our Nation’s dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, renewable, and alternative energy resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, developing greater efficiency, and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewables 

Reserve to invest in alternative energy, and for other purposes. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 401 

Date: December 4, 2007. 

Measure: H. Res. 839. Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of 

rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

Motion by: Mr. Hastings (FL). 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 8–2. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with HEARING_CN
2 

Vote by Members: Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Cardoza— Yea; Welch—Yea; Castor—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; Sutton—Yea; DiazBalart—Nay; Hastings (WA)—Nay; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with HEARING_CN
### §433. Character and capital qualification of entrymen

The Secretary is authorized, under regulations to be promulgated by him, to require of each applicant including preference right ex-service men for entry to public lands on a project, such qualifications as to industry, experience, character, and capital, as in his opinion are necessary to give reasonable assurance of success by the prospective settler. The Secretary is authorized to appoint boards in part composed of private citizens, to assist in determining such qualifications.

(Dec. 5, 1924, ch. 4, §4, subsec. C, 43 Stat. 702.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Advances by Farm Security Administration as Capital

Act Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 509, 53 Stat. 1238, as amended June 17, 1940, ch. 390, 54 Stat. 402; May 28, 1941, ch. 136, 55 Stat. 206; Aug. 1, 1942, ch. 540, 56 Stat. 732, authorized Secretary of the Interior during fiscal years 1940 to 1943 to consider money made available to settlers by the former Farm Security Administration to be all or part of the capital required under this section.

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 371 of this title apply to this section.
Case 3:09-cv-01212-MEJ Document 69 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:09-cv-01212-MEJ Document 69 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2
#### John J. Ryan, appellee, v. Charles E. Frazier et al., as Civil Service Commissioners, appellants.

Gen. No. 28,234.

Petition for *certiorari*against Civil Service Commissioners of Chicago to certify their proceedings involving petitioner’s discharge as a Civil Service employee. Return filed. Motion to quash return sustained. Motion to quash writ and dismiss petition denied. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. P. L. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of ‘this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Rehearing denied July 3, 1923.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, for appellants; Gilbert G.' Ogden, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel. Michael F. Ryan, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
DO NOT DISTRIBUTE WITHOUT OIG AUTHORIZATION

DRAFT REPORT

Review of FEMA’s Use of Proceeds From the Sales of Emergency Housing Units 

Page 0

Management Advisory Report – FEMA 

Emergency Housing Units Property 

Management

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

Office of Inspector General 

OIG-08-33 March 2008


Additional Information and Copies 

To obtain additional copies of this report, call the Office of Inspector General 

(OIG) at (202) 254-4199, fax your request to (202) 254-4305, or visit the OIG web 

site at www.dhs.gov/oig. 

OIG Hotline 

To report alleged fraud, waste, abuse or mismanagement, or any other kind of 

criminal or noncriminal misconduct relative to department programs or 

operations: 

• Call our Hotline at 1-800-323-8603; 

• Fax the complaint directly to us at (202) 254-4292; 

• Email us at DHSOIGHOTLINE@dhs.gov; or 

• Write to us at: 

DHS Office of Inspector General/MAIL STOP 2600, Attention: 

Office of Investigations - Hotline, 245 Murray Drive, SW, Building 410, 

Washington, DC 20528. 

The OIG seeks to protect the identity of each writer and caller.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,991-01

EX PARTE ESSEABASI SAMUEL WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1455285-A IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to thirty

years’ imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Williams v. State, 499

S.W.3d 498 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016). Applicant filed this application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On April 8, 2020, the trial court entered an order designating issues. The district clerk

properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the trial court made findings of fact and

conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary
investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 27, 2021

Do not publish
### §513. Lands in project subject to provisions of chapter; after contract with irrigation district

Upon the execution of any contract between the United States and any irrigation district pursuant to sections 511 and 512 of this title the public lands included within such irrigation district, when subject to entry, and entered lands within such irrigation district, for which no final certificates shall have been issued and which may be designated by the Secretary of the Interior in said contract, shall be subject to all the provisions of chapter 13 of this title: Provided, That no map or plan as required by section 623 of this title need be filed by the irrigation district for approval by the Secretary of the Interior.

(May 15, 1922, ch. 190, §3, 42 Stat. 542.)
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 30.90 Response to the complaint. ( a ) *Request for a hearing.* If the respondent desires a hearing before an administrative law judge, the respondent shall submit a request for a hearing to HUD and the Office of Hearings and Appeals no later than 15 days following receipt of the complaint, as required by statute. This mandated period cannot be extended.
( b ) *Answer.* In any case in which the respondent has requested a hearing, the respondent shall serve upon HUD and file with the Office of Hearings and Appeals a written answer to the complaint within 30 days of receipt of the complaint, unless such time is extended by the administrative law judge for good cause. The answer shall include the admission or denial of each allegation of liability made in the complaint; any defense on which the respondent intends to rely; any reasons why the civil money penalty should be less than the amount sought in the complaint, based on the factors listed at § 30.80; and the name, address, and telephone number of the person who will act as the respondent's representative, if any.
( c ) *Filing with the administrative law judges.* HUD shall file the complaint and response with the Docket Clerk, Office of Hearings and Appeals, in accordance with § 26.38 of this chapter. If no response is submitted, then HUD may file a motion for default judgment, together with a copy of the complaint, in accordance with § 26.41 of this title.
[61 FR 50215, Sept. 24, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 2752, Jan. 15, 2009; 74 FR 7313, Feb. 17, 2009; 74 FR 4635, Jan. 26, 2009; 78 FR 4060, Jan. 18, 2013]