alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 26.41 Default. ( a ) *General.* The respondent may be found in default, upon motion, for failure to file a timely response to the Government's complaint. The motion shall include a copy of the complaint and a proposed default order, and shall be served upon all parties. The respondent shall have 10 days from such service to respond to the motion.
( b ) *Default order.* The ALJ shall issue a decision on the motion within 15 days after the expiration of the time for filing a response to the default motion. If a default order is issued, it shall constitute the final agency action.
( c ) *Effect of default.* A default shall constitute an admission of all facts alleged in the Government's complaint and a waiver of respondent's right to a hearing on such allegations. The penalty proposed in the complaint shall be set forth in the default order and shall be immediately due and payable by respondent without further proceedings.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting date change. 

# SUMMARY:

On Thursday, July 8, 2004 (69 FR 41231), the Department of Defense announced closed meetings of the Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Future Strategic Strike Forces. The meeting originally scheduled for December 15-16, 2004, has been moved to December 14-16, 2004. The meeting will be held at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500, Arlington, VA.

Dated: November 29, 2004.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-28261  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 241.1030 Mortgage insurance premiums. The lender, upon endorsement of the note, shall pay the Commissioner a first mortgage insurance premium equal to 0.5 percent of the original face amount of the equity or acquisition loan. ( a ) If the date of the first principal payment is more than one year following the date of endorsement, the lender upon each anniversary of such endorsement date, shall pay a premium equal to 0.5 percent of the original face amount of the loan. On the date of the first principal payment, the lender shall pay another premium equal to 0.5 percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the following year which shall be adjusted so as to accord with such date and so that the aggregate of said premiums shall equal the sum of: ( 1 ) 0.5 percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the year following the date of endorsement; and
( 2 ) 0.5 percent per annum of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the period from the first anniversary of the date of endorsement to one year following the date of the first principal payment.
( b ) If the date of the first principal payment is one year or less than one year following the date of endorsement, the lender, upon such first principal payment date, shall pay a second premium equal to 0.5 percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the following year which shall be adjusted so as to accord with such date and so that the aggregate of the said two premiums shall equal the sum of: ( 1 ) 0.5 percent per annum of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the period from the date of endorsement to the date of the first principal payment; and
( 2 ) 0.5 percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the year following the date of the first payment following the date of the first principal payment.
( c ) Until the equity or acquisition loan is paid in full or until receipt by the Commissioner of an application for insurance benefits, or until the contract of insurance is otherwise terminated with the consent of the Commissioner, the lender on each anniversary date of the first principal payment, shall pay an annual insurance premium equal to 0.5 percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the loan for the year following the date on which such premium becomes payable.
( d ) The premiums payable on or after the date of the first principal payment shall be calculated in accordance with the amortizing provisions without taking into account delinquent payments or prepayments.
( e ) Premiums shall be payable in cash or in debentures at par plus accrued interest. All premiums are payable in advance and no refund can be made of any portion thereof except as hereinafter provided in subpart E of this part.
smsashreve1012gex41091710.htm


 








 


EXHIBIT 4.1


 


 


CUSIP


 



	  	
SMSA SHREVEPORT ACQUISITION CORP. 

	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

	  	  
	  	  	
SEE REVERSE FOR

	  
	  	
COMMON STOCK 

	
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
SPECIMEN

	  	  










 


 


This


certifies


that


 


 


 


 


is the owner of


 


 


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF


SMSA SHREVEPORT ACQUISITION CORP.


 


(hereinafter called the "Corporation"), transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation, as amended (copies of which are on file at the office of the Transfer Agent), to all of which the holder of this Certificate by acceptance hereof assents. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. Witness the facsmile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 



	
DATE:

	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	
  [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]

	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	  	  	
 Countersigned:

	  	  
	
PRESIDENT

	  	  	
SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION

	  	  
	  	  	  	
P.O. Box 701629

	  	  
	  	  	  	
Dallas, TX 75370

	  	  
	  	  	  	
By:

	  	  
	  	  
	  	  
	
SECRETARY

	  	  	
___________________________________

	  	  
	  	  	  	
TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

	  	  










 


 


 


 


 


 


 







 


 


[Missing Graphic Reference]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2970 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2970

   To provide public safety officer disability benefits to officers 
  disabled before the enactment of the Federal public safety officer 
                        disability benefits law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2005

Mr. Kuhl of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide public safety officer disability benefits to officers 
  disabled before the enactment of the Federal public safety officer 
                        disability benefits law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disabled Public Safety Officers 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. DISABILITY BENEFITS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS DISABLED BEFORE 
              ENACTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DISABILITY LAW.

    (a) In General.--Section 1201(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by inserting after ``determines 
that a public safety officer has'' the following: ``, whether before, 
on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act,''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies to 
any public safety officer alive on or after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 220.275 Method of paying insurance benefits.

If the application for insurance benefits is acceptable to the Commissioner, all of the insurance claim shall be paid in cash unless the mortgagee files a written request with the application for payment in debentures. If such a request is made, all of the claim shall be paid by issuing debentures and by making a cash payment adjusting any differences between the total amount of the claim and the amount of the debentures issued.
' li I! 

': 

I· 

" I 

I· 

[i 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

RECE~VED 

JAN 2 a 2015 

HEAR.!NG DOCK~T 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0685 

SMYRNA AIR CENTER. FAA CASE NO. 2011CE190020 

Respondent Judge J.E. Sullivan 

Draft Joint Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report Submitted by Complainant FAA 

and Respondent Smyrna Air Center 

I. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.217 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), a teleconference was held on 

January 13,2015, and was attended by (I) Ryan Landers, counsel for Complainant, and (2) Will 

Leech, counsel for Respondent. 

2. The parties have discussed settlement, but have not reached a settlement. Settlement 

discussions will continue. 

3. The parties will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(I) by January 

30,2015. 

4. The parties agree that initial discovery requests will be made by February I 1, 2015. The 

parties will have until March 13, 2015, to respond to initial discovery requests. 

5. The parties agree that follow-up discovery requests will be made by March 23, 2015. 

The parties have until March 3 I, 2015, to respond to follow-up discovery requests. 

6. Any objections to discovery requests must be made to the requesting party within two 

weeks of the discovery request. 
7. The parties agree that all dispositive motions must be filed by May 1, 2015. A response 

brief to any dispositive motion must be filed by June 1, 2015. A reply brief must be filed by 

June 8, 2015. If oral argument is needed on a dispositive motion, oral argument will be June 22, 

2015 from 10:00-11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. 

8. The parties agree that a trial the week of June 29, 2015, in the Nashville, Tennessee area 

would be best for them. 

Respectively submitted this I L-/ , day of January, 20! 5. 

~~':;;. Will Leech !ft-~- Counsel for Respondent 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Section 13.217/Rule 26(f) Report was sent as follows: 

original and one copy via regular mail and Federal Express to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wrigbt Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

one copy via facsimile and Federal Express to: 

The Honorable J .E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

one copy via certified mail to: 

Mink & Duke, PLLC 

c/o Thomas F. Mink, II, Esq. 

c/o William M. Leech, III, Esq. 

P.O. Box 198742 

Nashville, TN 37219-8742 

Dated
#### § 518.5 Subawards.

Unless sections of this part specifically exclude subrecipients from coverage, the provisions of this part shall be applied to subrecipients performing work under awards if such subrecipients are institutions of higher education, hospitals or other non-profit organizations. State and local government subrecipients are subject to the provisions of regulations implementing the grants management common rule, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments,” published at 53 FR 9034 (3/11/88).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 29, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 29, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19I0080. CENTURION INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a A-LERT CONSTRUCTION 

SERVICES v. IVY SMITHWICK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017SC73 2016SCV167
#### § 1000.304 May the IHBG formula be modified?

Yes, as long as any modification does not conflict with the requirements of NAHASDA.
### §375f. Rules and regulations

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to perform any and all acts and to make rules and regulations necessary and proper for carrying out the purposes of sections 375b to 375f of this title.

(Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 78, §5, 64 Stat. 40.)
### §1579. Fish and wildlife habitat; mitigation of losses

Effective October 1, 1979, and to such extent and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriate 1 Acts, in order to provide measures determined by the Secretary of the Interior to be appropriated to mitigate loss of fish and wildlife habitat associated with other measures taken under this subchapter:

#### (a) Appropriation of funds; acquisition and disposal of lands; facilities undertakings; funds restriction for non-Federal facilities

The Secretary is authorized to—

(1) acquire lands by purchase, eminent domain, or exchange;

(2) dispose of land, facilities, and equipment;

(3) construct, operate, maintain, and make replacements of facilities: Provided, however, That no funds will be provided for operation, maintenance, or replacement of non-Federal facilities.

#### (b) Nonreimbursable costs

All costs authorized by this section are nonreimbursable.

(Pub. L. 93–320, title I, §110, as added Pub. L. 96–336, §6, Sept. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1064.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "appropriation".
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7123

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
SINCLAIR ELLIS, JR. ,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr
- 00515

- GLR

- 1 )

Submitted : December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Sinclair Ellis, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7123 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Sinclair Ellis, Jr., appeals the di strict court’s order denying h is 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(1)(A) (i) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial

of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble , 992
F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) , cer t. denied , No. 21

- 5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12,
2021)

. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion
and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial

. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d

181, 188

- 91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of
compassionate release motion). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7123 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
#### § 512.8 Omissions not a defense.

The failure of Broadcasting Board of Governors to comply with any provision in this regulation shall not serve as a defense to the debt.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Eugene Garner, Appellant, v. Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

*881Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from order of Cayuga County Court dismissing the writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator to the custody of the Warden of Auburn Prison.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
#### § 903.10 Access to witnesses.

The grievant or grievant's representative, or charged employee or his representative, shall be given access to witnesses employed by the foreign affairs agencies. In the event that the agency of the grievant determines that the requests for access are excessive, it may so notify the Board, which shall rule on the relevance and materiality of the potential testimony and may order that access be granted to any or all of the potential witnesses. It shall be the responsibility of the grievant to advise the agency of the agency witnesses to be interviewed and to request administrative leave.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of JCC Holding Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul D.
Debban, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 13, 2002                  /s/ Paul D. Debban
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Paul D. Debban
                                       President
### §7384m. Expansion of list of beryllium vendors

Not later than December 31, 2002, the President may, in consultation with the Secretary of Energy, designate as a beryllium vendor for purposes of section 7384l(6) of this title any vendor, processor, or producer of beryllium or related products not previously listed under or designated for purposes of such section 7384l(6) of this title if the President finds that such vendor, processor, or producer has been engaged in activities related to the production or processing of beryllium for sale to, or use by, the Department of Energy in a manner similar to the entities listed in such section 7384l(6) of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3622], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–502.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of certain functions of the President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 13179, Dec. 7, 2000, 65 F.R. 77487, set out as a note under section 7384 of this title.
#### John Sandlin, appellant, v. J. J. Flexter et al., appellees.

Bill for reformation of a mortgage, and for specific performance to execute and deliver note thereon. Bill dismissed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Wayne county; the Hon. Charles H. Miller, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Creighton & Thomas, for appellant. Herbert T. Kerr and Virgil W. Mills, for appellees; Carrol C. Boggs, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered th.e opinion of the court.
§ 1006.700 When may the suspending official issue a suspension? Suspension is a serious action. Using the procedures of this subpart and subpart F of this part, the suspending official may impose suspension only when that official determines that— ( a ) There exists an indictment for, or other adequate evidence to suspect, an offense listed under § 1006.800(a), or
( b ) There exists adequate evidence to suspect any other cause for debarment listed under § 1006.800(b) through (d); and
( c ) Immediate action is necessary to protect the public interest.
#### § 9a.5 Declassification and downgrading.

The provisions of E.O. 11652, 22 CFR 9.9 through 9.15, and 9a.4(b) shall govern declassification and downgrading of such information or material.
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 5 of 6
July 12, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 186 Filed 07/12/10 Page 6 of 6
#### Audra Cunningham, appellee, v. Clyde Cunningham, appellant.

Bill for separate maintenance for extreme and repeated cruelty. Judgment for complainant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Wayne county; the Hon. Julius C. Kern, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Creighton & Thomas, for appellant. Roscoe Forth, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the court.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Master Marine, Inc. 

Under Contract No. W912P8-18-P-0029 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 62044 

A. Clay Rankin, Esq. 

Rankin Law LLC 

Fairhope, AL 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Thomas M. Taff, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: September 12, 2019 

dministrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62044, Appeal of Master Marine, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals