1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

William M. Audet (CA State Bar #117456) 

waudet@audetlaw.com

Joshua C. Ezrin (CA State Bar #220157) 

jezrin@audetlaw.com

AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP 

221 Main Street, Suite 1460 

San Francisco CA 94105 

Telephone: (415) 568-2555 

Facsimile: (415) 568-2556 

Alan R. Plutzik (CA State Bar No. 077785) 

aplutzik@bramsonplutzik.com

Jennifer S. Rosenberg (CA State Bar No. 121023) 

jrosenberg@bramsonplutik.com

BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP 

2125 Oak Grove Road, Suite 120 

Walnut Creek, CA 95498 

Telephone: (925) 945-0200 

Facsimile: (925) 945-8792 

Harris L. Pogust (PA Bar No. 52721) 

hpogust@pbmattorneys.com

Derek T. Braslow (PA Bar No. 78994) 

dbraslow@pbmattorneys.com

POGUST, BRASLOW & MILLROOD, LLC 

161 Washington Street, Suite 1520 

Conshohocken, PA 19428 

Telephone: (610) 941-4204 

Facsimile: (610) 941-4245 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

and the Proposed Class 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TINA WALTER, CHRISTOPHER 

BAYLESS and ERIC SCHUMACHER, 

individually and on behalf of others similarly 

situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and 

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, 

 Defendants.

CASE NO: 09-CV-02136 SC 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

Date: May 7, 2010 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Courtroom: 1, 17th Floor 

The Honorable Samuel Conti 

Case 3:09-cv-02136-SC Document 50 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 3
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WHEREAS, on March 18, 2010, Defendants HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 

and HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, (hereinafter, “Defendant”) filed a Motion to 

Dismiss and Strike Portions of the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, 

currently set for hearing on May 7, 2010;

WHEREAS, the Opposition to Defendant’s Motion is due to be filed with this Court on 

or before April 16, 2010;

WHEREAS, any Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to the Motion is due to be filed with 

this Court on or before April 23, 2010;

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2010, the Parties participated in a full and productive day of 

mediation with the Hon. Ronald Sabraw (Ret.), at the JAMS offices in San Francisco, 

California, at which time the basic framework of a class wide settlement to this matter was 

discussed; 

WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to exchange drafts of proposed settlement 

agreements prior to their return to JAMS for another mediation session with Judge Sabraw on 

July 8, 2010;

WHEREAS, to allow the Parties an opportunity to meaningfully continue their 

discussions regarding the possible settlement of this matter, the Parties agree that the hearing on 

the Motion to Dismiss should be continued until after the July 8 mediation session; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties through their respective 

counsel, that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss currently scheduled for May 7, 2010 shall be 

continued until September 3, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., and further stipulated that the briefing schedule 

be continued accordingly to August 13, 2010 for the Opposition and August 20, 2010 for the 

Reply.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 7, 2010 AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Joshua C. Ezrin 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 3:09-cv-02136-SC Document 50 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 3
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 7, 2010 HOGAN & HARTSON LLP 

By: /s/ 

 Robert B. Hawk 

Attorneys for Defendants 

HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and 

HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS LLC 

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April , 2010 

 THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI 

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:09-cv-02136-SC Document 50 Filed 04/07/10 Page 3 of 3