alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT 11
                                GUITAR CENTER, INC.
                          COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE
                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Quarter Ended               Nine Months Ended
                                                         September 30,                September 30,
                                                  -------------------------     -------------------------
                                                      1998           1997           1998           1997
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net income                                        $    4,717     $    3,283     $   13,793     $    3,684

Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic                                                 20,076         19,329         19,658         19,329
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

Dilutive effect of potential common shares               924          1,406          1,211          1,127
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

Diluted                                               21,000         20,735         20,869         20,456
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

Income per common share
Basic                                             $     0.23     $     0.17     $     0.70     $     0.19
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

Diluted                                           $     0.22     $     0.16     $     0.66     $     0.18
                                                  ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1


SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION





I,
Michael S. Wasik, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10−QSB of Roomlinx, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a−15(e) and 15d−15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such


disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our


supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small


business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known


to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period


in which
this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's


disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our


conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and


procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on


such
evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's


internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the


small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business


issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that


has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,


the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;


and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design


or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are


reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's


ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;


and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or


other
employees who have a significant role in the small business


issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
            9/25/08By:
            /s/
      Michael S. WasikMichael S. WasikChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Marc V. Kalagian

Attorney at Law: 149034

Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP

211 E. Ocean Boulevard, Ste. 420

Long Beach, California 90802

Tel: (562) 437-7006

Fax: (562) 432-2935

E-Mail: marckalagian_rohlfinglaw@hotmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHEN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD A. JEFFREY,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CV 09-1834 CRB

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE; AND ORDER

TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER, MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

OF THE DISTRICT COURT:

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cv-01834-CRB Document 17 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their 

respective counsel, that pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41 (a) (1) (ii) the above 

captioned matter be dismissed with each side to bear its own costs.

DATE: 1/4/10 Respectfully submitted,

 ROHLFING & KALAGIAN, LLP

 

 /s/-Marc V. Kalagian

 Marc V. Kalagian

 Attorney for Plaintiff

DATE: 1/4/10 JOSEPH R. RUSSONIELLO

 United States Attorney

 LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS

 Chief Civil Division

 */s/-Leo R. Montenegro

 Leo R. Montenegro

 Special Assistant United States Attorney

 Attorney for Defendant

 [*By email authorization on December 31, 2009]

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that this case shall be 

dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: __________________ _____________________________

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States Magistrate Judge

January 5, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-01834-CRB Document 17 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

The Clerk of Court shall close the file. 

Dated: April 13, 2010

UNITED STATES

D

I

S

TRICT COURT

NORTHERN

DIST

RICT

OF CALIFORNIA

GRANTED

Judge

Maria-Elena

James
§ 1000.331 How will the impacts from adoption of a new data source be minimized as the new data source is implemented? ( a ) To minimize the impact of funding changes based on the introduction of a new data source under § 1000.330, in fiscal year 2018 and each year thereafter, if, solely as a direct result of the introduction of a new data source, an Indian tribe's allocation under the need component of the formula is less than 90 percent of the amount it received under the need component in the immediate previous fiscal year, the Indian tribe's need allocation shall be adjusted up to an amount equal to 90 percent of the previous year's need allocation.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall impact other adjustments under this part, including minimum funding, census challenges, formula area changes, or an increase in the total amount of funds available under the need component.
( c ) In the event of a decrease in the total amount of funds available under the need component, an Indian tribe's adjusted allocation under paragraph (a) of this section shall be reduced by an amount proportionate to the reduced amount available for distribution under the need component of the formula.
( d ) Adjustments under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section shall be made to a tribe's need allocation after adjusting that allocation under paragraph (a) of this section.
[81 FR 83681, Nov. 22, 2016]
### §422j. Appropriations; notice to Congress of receipt of proposal; funds to initiate proposal; availability of appropriations; reimbursement; limitations on expenditures in any single State; waiver

There are authorized to be appropriated, such sums as may be necessary, but not to exceed $600,000,000, to carry out the provisions of this subchapter and, effective October 1, 1986, not to exceed an additional $600,000,000: Provided, That the Secretary shall advise the Congress promptly on the receipt of each proposal referred to in section 422c of this title, and no contract shall become effective until appropriated funds are available to initiate the specific proposal covered by each contract. All such appropriations shall remain available until expended and shall, insofar as they are used to finance loans made under this subchapter, be reimbursable in the manner hereinabove provided. Not more than 20 percent of the total amount of additional funds authorized to be appropriated effective October 1, 1986, for loans and grants pursuant to this subchapter shall be for projects in any single State: Provided, That beginning five years after October 27, 1986, the Secretary is authorized to waive the 20 percent limitation for loans and grants which meet the purposes set forth in section 422a of this title: Provided further, That the decision of the Secretary to waive the limitation shall be submitted to the Congress together with the project proposal pursuant to section 422d(c) of this title and shall become effective only if the Congress has not, within 60 legislative days, passed a joint resolution of disapproval for such a waiver.

(Aug. 6, 1956, ch. 972, §10, 70 Stat. 1047; Pub. L. 89–553, §1(6), Sept. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 92–167, §1(7), Nov. 24, 1971, 85 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 94–181, §1(g), Dec. 27, 1975, 89 Stat. 1050; Pub. L. 96–336, §8(a), Sept. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1065; Pub. L. 99–546, title III, §309, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3055.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"October 27, 1986," substituted in text for "the date of enactment of this Act", meaning the date of enactment of Pub. L. 99–546, which amended this section, rather than August 6, 1956, the date of enactment of this section, as the probable intent of Congress.

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–546 inserted "and effective October 1, 1986, not to exceed an additional $600,000,000" and inserted provisions at end limiting allocation for projects in any single State to 20 percent of additional funds authorized to be appropriated effective Oct. 1, 1986, authorizing waiver of that limitation, and requiring submission of waiver decision to Congress.

1980—Pub. L. 96–336 substituted "$600,000,000" for "$400,000,000".

1975—Pub. L. 94–181 substituted "$400,000,000" for "$300,000,000".

1971—Pub. L. 92–167 substituted "$300,000,000" for "$200,000,000".

1966—Pub. L. 89–553 substituted "$200,000,000" for "$100,000,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–336, §8(a), Sept. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1065, provided that the amendment made by section 8(a) is effective Oct. 1, 1980.
### §316e. Preferences

In considering applications to lease grazing privileges the Secretary shall, as far as is consistent with the efficient administration of the grazing district, prefer (1) natives, (2) other occupants of the range, and (3) settlers over all other applicants.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 513, §6, 44 Stat. 1453.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 471e of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      Crit S. DeMent


March
      30,
      2006 Crit
      S.
      DeMent


Chief
      Executive Officer  of the General Partner
#### § 1000.528 What are the procedures for the recipient to comment on the result of HUD's review when HUD issues a report under section 405(b) of NAHASDA?

HUD will issue a draft report to the recipient and Indian tribe within 60 days of the completion of HUD's review. The recipient will have at least 60 days to review and comment on the draft report, as well as provide any additional information relating to the draft report. Upon written notification to HUD, the recipient may exercise the right to take an additional 30 days to complete its review and comment to the draft report. Additional extensions of time for the recipient to complete review and comment may be mutually agreed upon in writing by HUD and the recipient. HUD shall consider the comments and any additional information provided by the recipient. HUD may also revise the draft report based on the comments and any additional information provided by the recipient. HUD shall make the recipient's comments and a final report readily available to the recipient, grant beneficiary, and the public not later than 30 days after receipt of the recipient's comments and additional information.

[77 FR 71529, Dec. 3, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.630 Notice of housing opportunities.

The Director of each Field Office shall prepare monthly a list of all projects covered by this subpart, and of all initial submissions by lenders for single family mortgage insurance where the property is located in a subdivision and the builder or developer intends to sell five or more properties in the subdivision, on which commitments have been issued during the preceding 30 days. The Director shall maintain a roster of interested organizations and individuals (including public agencies responsible for providing relocation assistance and local housing authorities) who have expressed a wish to receive the monthly list, and shall provide the list to these organizations and individuals.

[58 FR 41337, Aug. 3, 1993]
Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 127 Filed 08/12/10 Page 1 of 2
DATED: August 12, 2010 

REQUEST IS DENIED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

DENIED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 127 Filed 08/12/10 Page 2 of 2
STIPULATION RE ADR 

Case No. C09-1446 CW

 n:\labor\li2009\090997\00604014.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788 Chief Labor Attorney 

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, State Bar #129688 

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3933 

Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 

E-Mail: larry.hecimovich@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE COMMISSION, and 

SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT 

DANIEL M. CRAWFORD 

354 Pine Street, Third Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

Telephone: (415) 433-1442 

Facsimile: (415) 986-4056 

E-Mail: dan@dancrawfordlaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner 

MATTHEW P. TONSING 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MATTHEW P. TONSING, 

 Petitioner and Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

COMMISSION, and SAN FRANCISCO 

POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

 Respondents and Defendants. 

Case No. C09-1446 CW 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

MODIFYING ADR CUT-OFF DATE 

Trial Date: 1/10/2011

Case 3:09-cv-01446-RS Document 28 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 2
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 

Case No. C09-1446 CW

1 n:\labor\li2009\090997\00604014.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 WHEREAS, the Court has not yet ruled on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Rule 12c), heard 

September 17, 2009; and 

 WHEREAS, the last day to complete Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures in this matter 

is January 19, 2010 and the parties believe that it would be efficacious to mediate the case prior to 

conducting discovery but subsequent to receiving the court's ruling on Defendant's motion; and 

 WHEREAS, the existing cut-off dates would not allow the parties to do so; 

 THEREFORE the parties stipulate to modify the Case Management Order as follows: 

 Extend the ADR cut off from January 19, 2010 to March 19, 2010; 

 The remaining deadlines, including the trial date and all related pre-trial deadlines shall 

remain as set. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED 

Dated: January 13, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

ELIZABETH S. SALVESON 

Chief Labor Attorney 

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH 

Deputy City Attorney 

By: /s/Lawrence Hecimovich

LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: January 13, 2010 By: /s/Daniel M. Crawford

Attorneys for Plaintiff / Petitioner 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

 _________________________ 

 Honorable Claudia Wilken 

 Judge of the District Court 

1/22/10

Case 3:09-cv-01446-RS Document 28 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 2
### §1459. Expenditures of department

The Secretary of the Interior shall sign all requisitions for the advance or payment of money, out of the Treasury, upon estimates or accounts for expenditures upon business assigned by law to his department; subject, however, to adjustment and control by the Government Accountability Office.

(R.S. §444; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 24; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §444 derived from act Mar. 3, 1849, ch. 108, §2, 9 Stat. 395.

Section was formerly classified to section 487 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Government Accountability Office" substituted in text for "General Accounting Office" pursuant to section 8(b) of Pub. L. 108–271, set out as a note under section 702 of Title 31, Money and Finance, which redesignated the General Accounting Office and any references thereto as the Government Accountability Office. Previously, "General Accounting Office" substituted in text for "proper accounting officers of Department of the Treasury" pursuant to act June 10, 1921, which transferred all powers and duties of Comptroller, six auditors, and certain other employees of the Treasury to General Accounting Office. See section 701 et seq. of Title 31.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
### §4721. Declaration of purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to assist State and local governments to strengthen their staffs by improving their personnel administration.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title II, §201, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1911.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,466
<ALLOWANCES>                                       756
<INVENTORY>                                    192,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,747
<PP&E>                                          95,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 315,165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,814
<BONDS>                                         67,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   315,165
<SALES>                                        545,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,399
<CGS>                                          405,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,439
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>