Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 76519 

11 This rate is based on the weighted-average of 

the margins calculated for those companies selected 

for individual review using the publicly-ranged 

U.S. quantities. Because we cannot apply our 

normal methodology of calculating a weightedaverage margin due to requests to protect business 

proprietary information, we find this rate to be the 

best proxy of the actual weighted-average margin 

determined for the mandatory respondents. See Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 

Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 

(September 1, 2010); see also Memorandum, 

‘‘Calculation of the Review-Specific Average Rate 

for the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice. 

1See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in 

Part; 2017–2018, 85 FR 7282 (February 7, 2020) 

(Preliminary Results) and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2We continue to treat Canfor Corporation; 

Canadian Forest Products Ltd.; and Canfor Wood 

Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a 

single entity. See Preliminary Results PDM at 5. 

3We continue to treat Resolute Growth Canada 

Inc.; Forest Products Mauricie LP; Socie ́te ́ en 

commandite Scierie Opitciwan; Resolute-LP 

Engineered Wood Larouche Inc.; Resolute-LP 

Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership; 

and Resolute FP Canada Inc. (collectively, Resolute) 

as a single entity. See Preliminary Results PDM at 

6. 

4We continue to treat West Fraser Mills Ltd.; Blue 

Ridge Lumber Inc.; Manning Forest Products Ltd.; 

and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, West 

Fraser) as a single entity. See Preliminary Results 

PDM at 6–7. 

5See IDM. 

6See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Antidumping Duty Order and Partial 

Amended Final Determination, 83 FR 350 (January 

3, 2018) (Softwood Lumber Order). 

7See IDM at Comment 4. 

Appendix II 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review: 11

Exporter or producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

AJU Besteel Co, Ltd ................... 11.60 

BDP International, Inc. ............... 11.60 

Daewoo International Corporation .......................................... 11.60 

Dongbu Incheon Steel Co .......... 11.60 

Dongbu Steel Co, Ltd ................. 11.60 

Dongkuk Steel Mill ...................... 11.60 

Dong Yang Steel Pipe ................ 11.60 

EEW Korea Co, Ltd .................... 11.60 

HISTEEL Co, Ltd ........................ 11.60 

Husteel Co, Ltd ........................... 11.60 

Hyundai RB Co Ltd .................... 11.60 

Hyundai Steel Company/Hyundai 

HYSCO ................................... 11.60 

Kelly Pipe Co, LLC. .................... 11.60 

Keonwoo Metals Co, Ltd ............ 11.60 

Kolon Global Corp ...................... 11.60 

Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co, 

Ltd ........................................... 11.60 

Kurvers Piping Italy S.R.L .......... 11.60 

MSTEEL Co, Ltd ........................ 11.60 

Miju Steel MFG Co, Ltd .............. 11.60 

Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division) ........................................ 11.60 

POSCO ....................................... 11.60 

POSCO Daewoo ........................ 11.60 

R&R Trading Co Ltd ................... 11.60 

Sam Kang M&T Co, Ltd ............. 11.60 

Sin Sung Metal Co, Ltd .............. 11.60 

SK Networks ............................... 11.60 

Soon-Hong Trading Company .... 11.60 

Steel Flower Co, Ltd ................... 11.60 

TGS Pipe .................................... 11.60 

Tokyo Engineering Korea Ltd ..... 11.60 

[FR Doc. 2020–26336 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–122–857] 

Certain Softwood Lumber Products 

from Canada: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2017–2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that producers 

and/or exporters subject to this 

administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

June 30, 2017 through December 31, 

2018. 

DATES: Effective November 30, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 

Pedersen (Canfor), Stephen Bailey 

(Resolute), Thomas Martin (West 

Fraser), or Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2769, (202) 482–0193, (202) 

482–3936, or (202) 482–5831, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review on 

February 7, 2020.1 This review covers 

253 producers/exporters of subject 

merchandise, including three 

mandatory respondents: Canfor,2

Resolute,3 and West Fraser.4 For events 

subsequent to the Preliminary Results, 

see Commerce’s Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5 The final weightedaverage dumping margins are listed 

below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ 

section of this notice. Commerce 

conducted this administrative review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this review is 

softwood lumber from Canada. For a full 

description of the scope, see the IDM. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs 

filed in this administrative review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM). A list of the topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is appended to this 

notice. The IDM is a public document 

and is available electronically via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Services System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the IDM is also accessible at 

http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ 

index.html. The signed IDM and the 

electronic versions of the IDM are 

identical in content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, Commerce has made the 

following changes to the Preliminary 

Results: 

• As detailed in the February 28, 

2020 Memorandum, ‘‘Correction of 

Company names on the Record,’’ we 

revised certain names listed in the 

Preliminary Results. These revisions 

resulted in the number of stated 

producers/exporters under review 

changing from 257 to 253. 

• In the Preliminary Results, we 

incorrectly stated the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation to 

be 6.58 percent. The correct all-others 

rate, as stated in the Softwood Lumber 

Order, is 6.04 percent.6

• We adjusted Canfor’s affiliated 

purchase prices of electricity and an 

input the identity of which is 

proprietary by the percentage the 

affiliated electricity purchases were 

below market prices.7

• We included Canfor’s inventory 

carrying costs incurred in the United 

States that were reported in U.S. dollars 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
76520 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 

8See IDM at Comment 7. 

9See IDM at Comment 9. 

10See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United 

Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order 

in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 11See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Rate for 

Non-Selected Respondents,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice. 

12See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final 

Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR 

51806 (November 8, 2017). 

in calculating Canfor’s final dumping 

margin.8

• We included Resolute’s domestic 

inventory carrying costs in the 

constructed export price calculation.9

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this administrative 

review, we are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the manufacturers/exporters listed 

below for the period of June 30, 2017 

through December 31, 2018: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

(percent) 

Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd ............................................................... 1.99 

Resolute Growth Canada Inc./Forest Products Mauricie LP, Socie ́te ́ en commandite Scierie Opitciwan/Resolute-LP Engineered 

Wood Larouche Inc./Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership/Resolute FP Canada Inc ............................. 1.15 

West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning Forest Products Ltd./and Sundre Forest Products Inc ............................ 1.40 

Non-selected Companies .................................................................................................................................................................... 1.57 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

We intend to calculate importer- (or 

customer-) specific assessment rates on 

the basis of the ratio of the total amount 

of antidumping duties calculated for 

each importer’s (or customer’s) 

examined sales and the total entered 

value of the sales in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- 

(or customer-) specific rate is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Generally, when calculating margins 

for non-selected respondents, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act for guidance, which provides 

instructions for calculating the allothers margin in an investigation. 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides 

that when calculating the all-others 

margin, Commerce will exclude any 

zero and de minimis weighted-average 

dumping margins, as well as any 

weighted-average dumping margins 

based on total facts available. 

Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice 

has been to average the margins for 

selected respondents, excluding margins 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available. 

In this review, we calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

1.99 percent for Canfor, 1.15 percent for 

Resolute, and 1.40 percent for West 

Fraser. In accordance with section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce 

assigned the weighted-average of these 

three calculated weighted-average 

dumping margins, 1.57 percent, to the 

non-selected companies in these final 

results. The rate calculated for the nonselected companies is a weightedaverage percentage margin which is 

calculated based on the U.S. values of 

the three reviewed companies with an 

affirmative antidumping duty margin.10

Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 

1.57 percent to the non-selected 

companies.11 A list of all non-selected 

companies is included in Attachment II. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by each 

respondent for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company or companies 

involved in the transaction. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of these final results, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the 

companies under review will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin listed above in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this review but 

covered in a previously completed 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

final results for the most recent period 

in which that producer or exporter 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review or in any 

previous segment of this proceeding, but 

the producer is, then the cash deposit 

rate will be that established for the 

producer of the merchandise in these 

final results of review or in the final 

results for the most recent period in 

which that producer participated; and 

(4) if neither the exporter nor the 

producer is a firm covered in this 

review or in any previously completed 

segment of this proceeding, then the 

cash deposit rate will be 6.04 percent ad 

valorem, the all-others rate established 

in the less than fair value 

investigation.12 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice is the only reminder to 

parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 76521 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

Dated: November 23, 2020. 

Joseph A. Laroski Jr., 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1. Particular Market Situation 

Allegation 

Comment 2. Canfor’s Reported Grades 

Comment 3. Canfor’s Reported Costs 

Comment 4. Valuing Affiliated 

Transactions Involving Canfor’s Grande 

Prairie Mill 

Comment 5. Valuing Canfor’s Seed 

Purchases 

Comment 6. Canfor’s Price George 

Sawmill’s Purchases of Electricity 

Comment 7. Ministerial Error Regarding 

Canfor’s Inventory Carrying Costs 

Incurred in the United States 

Comment 8. Whether to Adjust Resolute’s 

Grade Groups and Grade Equivalents 

Comment 9. Whether to Adjust for 

DINVCARU and INVCARU 

Comment 10. Whether to Adjust Resolute’s 

Costs for Other Direct Charges 

Comment 11. Zeroing 

Comment 12. The Differential Pricing 

Analysis is Inconsistent with the AD 

Agreement 

Comment 13. The Cohen’s d and Ratio 

Tests are Irrational 

Comment 14. Time Periods for the Cohen’s 

d Test 

Comment 15. Simple Average of Variances 

in the Cohen’s d Coefficient 

Comment 16. External Factors Which 

Explain the Price Differences 

Comment 17. Cohen’s d Test is Subject to 

Rule-Making Procedures 

Comment 18. Whether Commerce Should 

Modify West Fraser’s Reporting of 

Alternate Grades 

Comment 19. Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Facts Available Due to 

Discrepancies in West Fraser’s Reported 

Tally Sales 

Comment 20. Whether to Apply Offsets to 

West Fraser’s General and 

Administrative (G&A) Expense Ratio 

Comment 21. Whether Commerce Should 

Allocate Certain Affiliate Expenses to 

West Fraser G&A Expenses 

Comment 22. Whether Commerce Should 

Offset West Fraser’s G&A Expenses for 

Greenhouse Gas Credits 

Comment 23. Whether Commerce Should 

Include Equity-Based Compensation in 

G&A Expenses 

Comment 24. Whether Commerce Should 

Exclude Foreign Exchange Gain in West 

Fraser’s Financial Expense Ratio 

Comment 25. Iterations of Olympic’s Name 

Comment 26. Listing of Tolko’s Name in 

the Final Results 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Exporters/Producers 

• 1074712 BC Ltd. 

• 5214875 Manitoba Ltd. 

• 752615 B.C Ltd, Fraserview 

Remanufacturing Inc, dba Fraserview 

Cedar Products. 

• 9224–5737 Quebec Inc. (aka A.G. Bois) 

• A.B. Cedar Shingle Inc. 

• Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd. 

• AJ Forest Products Ltd. 

• Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd. 

• Aler Forest Products, Ltd. 

• Alpa Lumber Mills Inc. 

• American Pacific Wood Products 

• Anbrook Industries Ltd. 

• Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd. 

• Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Anglo-American Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Antrim Cedar Corporation 

• Aquila Cedar Products, Ltd. 

• Arbec Lumber Inc. 

• Aspen Planers Ltd. 

• B&L Forest Products Ltd 

• B.B. Pallets Inc. 

• Babine Forest Products Limited 

• Bakerview Forest Products Inc. 

• Bardobec Inc. 

• Barrette-Chapais Ltee 

• BarretteWood Inc. 

• Benoit & Dionne Produits Forestiers Ltee 

• Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Blanchet Multi Concept Inc. 

• Blanchette & Blanchette Inc. 

• Bois Aise de Montreal inc. 

• Bois Bonsaı ̈ inc. 

• Bois D’oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka Cedrico 

Lumber Inc.) 

• Bois Daaquam inc. 

• Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc. 

• Boisaco 

• Boscus Canada Inc. 

• Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd. 

• BPWood Ltd. 

• Bramwood Forest Inc. 

• Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc. 

• Busque & Laflamme Inc. 

• C&C Wood Products Ltd. 

• Caledonia Forest Products Inc. 

• Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd. 

• Canadian American Forest Products Ltd. 

• Canadian Wood Products Inc. 

• Canusa cedar inc. 

• Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd. 

• Careau Bois inc. 

• Carrier & Begin Inc. 

• Carrier Forest Products Ltd. 

• Carrier Lumber Ltd. 

• Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd. 

• Cedarline Industries, Ltd. 

• Central Cedar Ltd. 

• Centurion Lumber, Ltd. 

• Chaleur Sawmills LP 

• Channel-ex Trading Corporation 

• Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd. 

• Clermond Hamel Ltee 

• Coast Clear Wood Ltd. 

• Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. 

• Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. 

• Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc. 

• Cowichan Lumber Ltd. 

• CS Manufacturing Inc. dba Cedarshed 

• CWP—Industriel inc. 

• CWP—Montreal inc. 

• D & D Pallets, Ltd. 

• Dakeryn Industries Ltd. 

• Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd. 

• Delco Forest Products Ltd. 

• Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd. 

• Devon Lumber Co. Ltd. 

• DH Manufacturing Inc. 

• Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd. 

• Doubletree Forest Products Ltd. 

• Downie Timber Ltd. 

• Dunkley Lumber Ltd. 

• EACOM Timber Corporation 

• East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd. 

• Edgewood Forest Products Inc. 

• ER Probyn Export Ltd. 

• Eric Goguen & Sons Ltd. 

• Falcon Lumber Ltd. 

• Fontaine Inc 

• Foothills Forest Products Inc. 

• Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd. 

• Fraser Specialty Products Ltd. 

• Fraserview Cedar Products 

• Furtado Forest Products Ltd. 

• G & R Cedar Ltd. 

• Galloway Lumber Company Ltd. 

• Glandell Enterprises Inc. 

• Goat Lake Forest Products Ltd. 

• Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd. 

• Golden Ears Shingle Ltd. 

• Goldwood Industries Ltd. 

• Goodfellow Inc. 

• Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd. 

• Groupe Crete Chertsey 

• Groupe Crete division St-Faustin 

• Groupe Lebel inc. 

• Groupe Lignarex inc. 

• H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd. 

• Haida Forest Products Ltd. 

• Harry Freeman & Son Ltd. 

• Hornepayne Lumber LP 

• Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd. 

• Imperial Shake Co. Ltd. 

• Independent Building Materials Dist. 

• Interfor Corporation 

• Island Cedar Products Ltd 

• Ivor Forest Products Ltd. 

• J&G Log Works Ltd. 

• J.D. Irving, Limited 

• J.H. Huscroft Ltd. 

• Jan Woodland (2001) inc. 

• Jhajj Lumber Corporation 

• Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd. 

• Kan Wood, Ltd. 

• Kebois Ltee/Ltd 

• Keystone Timber Ltd. 

• Kootenay Innovative Wood Ltd. 

• Lafontaine Lumber Inc. 

• Langevin Forest Products Inc. 

• Lecours Lumber Co. Limited 

• Ledwidge Lumber Co. Ltd. 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
76522 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices 

1See Phosphate Fertilizers from the Kingdom of 

Morocco and the Russian Federation: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigations, 85 FR 44505 

(July 23, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Phosphate Fertilizers from the Kingdom of 

Morocco and the Russian Federation: Postponement 

of Preliminary Determinations in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigations, 85 FR 54535 (September 2, 

2020). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Affirmative Determination of the 

Countervailing Duty Investigation of Phosphate 

Fertilizers from the Kingdom of Morocco,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

• Leisure Lumber Ltd. 

• Les Bois d’oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier inc. 

• Les Bois Martek Lumber 

• Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc. 

• Les Chantiers de Chibougamau ltd. 

• Les Produits Forestiers D&G Ltee 

• Leslie Forest Products Ltd. 

• Lignum Forest Products LLP 

• Linwood Homes Ltd. 

• Longlac Lumber Inc. 

• Lulumco inc. 

• Magnum Forest Products, Ltd. 

• Maibec inc. 

• Manitou Forest Products Ltd. 

• Marcel Lauzon Inc. 

• Marwood Ltd. 

• Materiaux Blanchet Inc. 

• Matsqui Management and Consulting 

Services Ltd. dba Canadian Cedar Roofing 

Depot 

• Metrie Canada Ltd. 

• Mid Valley Lumber Specialties, Ltd. 

• Midway Lumber Mills Ltd. 

• Mill & Timber Products Ltd. 

• Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. 

• Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc. 

• MP Atlantic Wood Ltd. 

• Multicedre ltee 

• Nakina Lumber Inc. 

• National Forest Products Ltd. 

• New Future Lumber Ltd. 

• Nicholson and Cates Ltd 

• Norsask Forest Products Limited 

Partnership 

• North American Forest Products Ltd. 

(located in Saint-Quentin, New Brunswick) 

• North American Forest Products, Ltd. 

(located in Abbotsford, British Columbia) 

• North Enderby Timber Ltd. 

• Olympic Industries ULC/Olympic 

Industries ULC-Reman/Olympic Industries 

ULC-Reman Code/Olympic Industries Inc./ 

Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Codes 

• Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Pacific Pallet, Ltd. 

• Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd. 

• Parallel Wood Products Ltd. 

• Pat Power Forest Products Corporation 

• Phoenix Forest Products Inc. 

• Pine Ideas Ltd. 

• Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd 

• Porcupine Wood Products Ltd. 

• Power Wood Corp. 

• Precision Cedar Products Corp. 

• Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka Kenora 

Forest Products) 

• Produits Forestiers Petit Paris 

• Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c. 

• Produits Matra Inc. 

• Promobois G.D.S. inc. 

• Rayonier A.M. Canada GP 

• Rembos Inc. 

• Rene Bernard Inc. 

• Richard Lutes Cedar Inc. 

• Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc. 

• Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee 

• S & K Cedar Products Ltd. 

• S&R Sawmills Ltd 

• S&W Forest Products Ltd. 

• San Industries Ltd. 

• Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. 

• Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc. 

• Scierie St-Michel inc. 

• Scierie West Brome Inc. 

• Scotsburn Lumber Co. Ltd. 

• Sechoirs de Beauce Inc. 

• Serpentine Cedar Ltd. 

• Serpentine Cedar Roofing Ltd. 

• Sexton Lumber Co. Ltd. 

• Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd. 

• Silvaris Corporation 

• Silver Creek Premium Products Ltd. 

• Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd. 

• Skana Forest Products Ltd. 

• Skeena Sawmills Ltd 

• Sound Spars Enterprise Ltd. 

• South Beach Trading Inc. 

• Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc 

• Spruceland Millworks Inc. 

• Surrey Cedar Ltd. 

• T.G. Wood Products, Ltd 

• Taan Forest Products 

• Taiga Building Products Ltd. 

• Tall Tree Lumber Company 

• Teal Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Tembec Inc. 

• Terminal Forest Products Ltd. 

• The Teal-Jones Group 

• The Wood Source Inc. 

• Tolko Industries Ltd./Tolko Marketing and 

Sales Ltd./Gilbert Smith Forest Products 

Ltd. 

• Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. 

• Triad Forest Products Ltd. 

• Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. 

• Tyee Timber Products Ltd. 

• Universal Lumber Sales Ltd. 

• Usine Sartigan Inc. 

• Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC 

• Valley Cedar 2 ULC 

• Vancouver Island Shingle, Ltd. 

• Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. 

• Visscher Lumber Inc 

• W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. 

• Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. 

• Watkins Sawmills Ltd. 

• West Bay Forest Products Ltd. 

• West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 

• West Wind Hardwood Inc. 

• Western Forest Products Inc. 

• Western Lumber Sales Limited 

• Western Wood Preservers Ltd. 

• Weston Forest Products Inc. 

• Westrend Exteriors Inc. 

• Weyerhaeuser Co. 

• White River Forest Products L.P. 

• Winton Homes Ltd. 

• Woodline Forest Products Ltd. 

• Woodstock Forest Products 

• Woodtone Specialties Inc. 

• Yarrow Wood Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26333 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–714–001] 

Phosphate Fertilizers From the 

Kingdom of Morocco: Preliminary 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

phosphate fertilizers from the Kingdom 

of Morocco (Morocco). The period of 

investigation is January 1, 2019 through 

December 31, 2019. Interested parties 

are invited to comment on this 

preliminary determination. 

DATES: Applicable November 30, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Palmer or Samuel Glickstein, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–9068 or 

(202) 482–5307, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This preliminary determination is 

made in accordance with section 703(b) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). Commerce published the 

notice of initiation of this investigation 

on July 23, 2020.1 On September 2, 

2020, Commerce postponed the 

preliminary determination of this 

investigation and the revised deadline is 

now November 23, 2020.2 For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the initiation of this 

investigation, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

II to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed and electronic versions of 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 


TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES