alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6987. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $35,000,000 for the fiscal year 1978 to carry out the purposes of this subchapter (except for section 6982 of this title).

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §8007, as added Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 3259 of this title, prior to the general amendment of the Solid Waste Disposal Act by Pub. L. 94–580.
P OST O FFICE B OX 12548, A USTIN , T EXAS 78711-2548 TEL : (512)463-2100 WWW . T EXAS A TTORNEY G ENERAL

. GOV An Equal Employment Opportunity Employer · 

# March 30, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Ele c tro nic Filing Third Court of Appeals Price Daniel, Sr. Building 209 West 14th Street, Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

Re: Notification of Argument; No. 03-14-00302-CV; The Railroad Commission of Texas; CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Entex; and CenterPoint Energy Texas Gas v. Gulf Coast Coalition of Cities

Dear Mr. Kyle:
This acknowledges receipt of your letter dated March 24, 2015, giving notice this appeal will be submitted on May 20, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. I will appear and argue on behalf of Appellant, the Railroad Commission of Texas.

Regards,

/s/ Kellie E. Billings-Ray Kellie E. Billings-Ray Assistant Attorney General P.O. Box 12548, MC-066 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2012

cc. John Griffin, Railroad Commission Dane McKaughan Christopher L. Brewster ACCEPTED 03-14-00302-CV 4695742 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/30/2015 3:03:00 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
§ 241.885 Insurance benefits. ( a ) *Method of payment.* Payment of insurance claims shall be made in cash, in debentures, or in a combination of both, as determined by the Commissioner either at, or prior to, the time of payment.
( b ) *Amount of payment.* Upon acceptable assignment of the note and security instrument to the Commissioner, the insurance benefits shall be paid in an amount equal to 90 percent of the amount determined as follows: ( 1 ) By adding to the unpaid principal amount of the loan, computed as of the date of default, the following items: ( i ) Any accrued interest due as of the date of execution of the assignment of the loan to the Commissioner.
( ii ) Any advances approved by the Commissioner made previously by the lender under the provisions of the note or security instrument or instruments.
( iii ) Reimbursements for such reasonable collection costs, court costs, and attorney's fees as may be approved by the Commissioner.
( iv ) Any loan insurance premiums paid after default.
( v ) If payment is made in cash, an amount equivalent to the debenture interest which would have been earned thereon, as of the date such cash payment is made, except when the lender fails to meet any one of the applicable requirements of §§ 241.850, 241.875, and 241.880, within the specified time and in a manner satisfactory to the Commissioner (or within such further time as the Commissioner may approve in writing), the interest allowance in such cash payment shall be computed only to the date on which the particular required action should have been taken or to which it was extended.
( 2 ) By deducting from the total of the items computed under paragraph (b)(1) of this section the following items: ( i ) Any amount received by the lender on account of the loan after the date of default.
( ii ) Any net income received by the lender from the property covered by the note or security instrument and not applied to prior debts held by the lender.
( iii ) The sum of the cash items retained by the lender pursuant to § 241.880(h) (1) and (2).
[45 FR 57987, Aug. 29, 1980, as amended at 80 FR 51469, Aug. 25, 2015]
### §2603. Leasing of lands for grazing; disposition of moneys; rules and regulations covering grazing lands

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to lease for grazing any of said revested or reconveyed lands which may be so used without interfering with the production of timber or other purposes of this subchapter as stated in section 2601 of this title: Provided, That all the moneys received on account of grazing leases shall be covered either into the "Oregon and California land-grant fund" or the "Coos Bay Wagon Road grant fund" in the Treasury as the location of the leased lands shall determine, and be subject to distribution as other moneys in such funds: Provided further, That the Secretary is also authorized to formulate rules and regulations for the use, protection, improvement, and rehabilitation of such grazing lands.

(Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 876, title I, §4, 50 Stat. 875.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 876, 50 Stat. 874, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1181d of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 165 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 2
July 6, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 165 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 26.1 Purpose and scope.

This part sets forth rules of procedure in certain proceedings of the Department of Housing and Urban Development presided over by a hearing officer. These rules of procedure apply to administrative sanction hearings pursuant to 2 CFR part 2424 and to hearings with respect to determinations by the Multifamily Participation Review Committee pursuant to 24 CFR part 200, subpart H, to the extent that these regulations are not inconsistent and unless these regulations provide otherwise. They also apply in any other case where a hearing is required by statute or regulation, to the extent that rules adopted under such statute or regulation are not inconsistent.
### §618d. Readvances from Treasury where Dam Fund is insufficient to meet cost of replacements

If at any time there shall be insufficient sums in the Colorado River Dam Fund to meet the cost of replacements, however necessitated, in addition to meeting the other requirements of this subchapter, or of regulations authorized hereby and promulgated by the Secretary, the Secretary of the Treasury, upon request of the Secretary of the Interior, shall readvance to the said fund, in amounts not exceeding, in the aggregate, moneys repaid to the Treasury pursuant to section 618a(b) of this title, the amount required for replacements, however necessitated, in excess of the amount currently available therefor in said Colorado River Dam Fund. There is authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums, not exceeding said aggregate amount, as may be necessary to permit the Secretary of the Treasury to make such readvances. All such readvances shall bear interest.

(July 19, 1940, ch. 643, §5, 54 Stat. 777.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Readvances to Colorado River Dam Fund; Interest Rate on Readvances

Pub. L. 103–316, title II, Aug. 26, 1994, 108 Stat. 1713, which provided in part that amounts required for replacement work on the Boulder Canyon Project that would require readvances to the Colorado River Dam Fund from the total appropriated for operation and maintenance of reclamation projects were to be so readvanced pursuant to this section, and that readvances after Oct. 1, 1984, were to bear a prescribed interest rate, was from the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1995, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 103–126, title II, Oct. 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 1323.

Pub. L. 102–377, title II, Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1328.

Pub. L. 102–104, title II, Aug. 17, 1991, 105 Stat. 523.

Pub. L. 101–514, title II, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2084.

Pub. L. 101–101, title II, Sept. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 653.

Pub. L. 100–371, title II, July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 863.

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(d) [title II], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–104, 1329–115.

Pub. L. 99–500, §101(e) [title II], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–194, 1783–201, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(e) [title II], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–194, 3341–201.

Pub. L. 99–141, title II, Nov. 1, 1985, 99 Stat. 568.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUI T

________________________ No. 17

- 14613 Non

- Argument Cale n dar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16

- cr - 00264

- CG

- B

- 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus ELYRIC NATHANIEL SINGLETON, III , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________ (April 4, 2018) B efore MARCUS , ROSENBAUM , and NEWSOM Circuit Judges
. PER CURIAM : The Government ’ s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant ’ s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

– 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced

Case: 17-14613 Date Filed: 04/04/2018 Page: 1 of 22 if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).

Case: 17-14613 Date Filed: 04/04/2018 Page: 2 of 2
### §2506. Limitations of suits to annul patents

Suits by the United States to vacate and annul any patent shall only be brought within six years after the date of the issuance of such patents.

(Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 559, 26 Stat. 1093; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §8, 26 Stat. 1099.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1166 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAGGED, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DOES 1 THROUGH 10 as affiliate

programs for XXXBLACKBOOK.COM,

and ERIK VOGELER and DOES 11

through 500 as affiliate spammers for

XXXBLACKBOOK.COM,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01713 WHA

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the default judgment order dated January 25, 2010, defendant

Erick Vogeler and his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, affiliates, distributors, successors

and assigns, and any other persons acting in concert or participation with them are hereby

permanently enjoined from:

1. Initiating, originating, procuring, transmitting, sending, or causing to be sent

commercial electronic messages or any other commercial communications on or

through Tagged’s computers, Tagged’s website, or Tagged’s networks;

2. Paying, inducing, persuading, facilitating, enticing, or causing others to initiate,

originate, procure, transmit, send, or cause to be sent commercial electronic

messages or any commercial communications on or through Tagged’s computers,

Tagged’s website, or Tagged’s networks;

Case 3:09-cv-01713-WHA Document 44 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. Accessing or attempting to access Tagged’s website, networks, data, information,

user information, profiles, computers and/or computer systems for commercial

purposes;

4. Engaging in any activity that is intended to harm Tagged;

5. Circumventing technological measures that control access to Tagged’s website

and/or portions thereof, or inducing, encouraging, causing or materially

contributing to any other person or entity to do the same; and

6. Misusing or abusing Tagged, the Tagged website, or Tagged services in any

manner.

Judgment is entered against defendant Erik Vogeler and in favor of plaintiff Tagged, Inc.,

for $151,975 in damages and $50,000 in attorney’s fees and costs. The Court will retain

jurisdiction to enforce the injunction, but the case may be otherwise closed for administrative

purposes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 25, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01713-WHA Document 44 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Anna Alfieri, an Infant, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, Marjorie Alfieri, et al., Respondents, v Lewis General Tires, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Joseph J. Alfieri, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The conflicting evidence as to whether the truck had lights operating at the time of the accident presented a question of credibility to be resolved by the jury. A jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside as against the weight of the credible evidence unless it plainly appears that the evidence so preponder*1136ates in favor of the plaintiff that the finding could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence *(Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank,*10 AD2d 539, 544, affd 9 NY2d 829; *Abdoo v Wentworth,*49 AD2d 1002; *Lee v Lesniak,*40 AD2d 756). It cannot be said that the jury’s dismissal of the complaints as against Arthur Cammarono and Lewis General Tires, Inc., could not have been reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence. Further, we conclude that the claimed prejudicial reference made during a colloquy between the attorneys was not prejudicial to appellants inasmuch as there is no clear showing that the reference was to Cammarono and not Joseph Alfieri; additionally, at trial appellant’s counsel failed to make a proper motion for a mistrial. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—automobile negligence.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ.
39–008

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–70

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1271, FAA

RESEARCH, ENGINEERING, AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1997

APRIL 23, 1997.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 125]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 125, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1271, the

‘‘FAA Research, Engineering, and Development Authorization’’

under an open rule. The rule provides one hour of general debate

divided equally between the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science.

The rule waives section 306 (prohibiting consideration of legislation within the Budget Committee’s jurisdiction unless the Budget

Committee reported it) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

against consideration of the bill.

The rule makes in order the Committee on Science amendment

in the nature of a substitute as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment, with each section being considered as read. The rule

also waives section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974

against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute.

Members who have preprinted their amendments in the Record

prior to their consideration will be given priority in recognition to

offer their amendments if otherwise consistent with House rules.

Finally, the rule provides for one motion to recommit, with or without instructions.

Æ
### §§182 to 191. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787

Section 182, act Sept. 5, 1914, ch. 294, 38 Stat. 712, related to entry after forfeiture of prior entry without fault.

Section 183, R.S. §2300; Aug. 31, 1918, ch. 166, §8, 40 Stat. 957; Sept. 13, 1918, ch. 173, 40 Stat. 960, related to minor veterans, service in military establishment, and relinquishment of entries.

Section 184, R.S. §2302, prohibited discrimination based on race or color in construction or execution of certain laws.

Section 185, acts May 14, 1880, ch. 89, §2, 21 Stat. 141; Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §4, 26 Stat. 1097; July 26, 1892, ch. 251, 27 Stat. 270; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to preference right of entry of successful contestants.

Sections 186, acts Feb. 14, 1920, ch. 76, §§1, 2, 41 Stat. 434, 435; Jan. 21, 1922, ch. 32, §§1, 2, 42 Stat. 358; Dec. 28, 1922, ch. 19, 42 Stat. 1067; June 12, 1930, ch. 471, 46 Stat. 580, related to preference right of entry of veterans, and promulgation of rules and regulations.

Section 187, act Feb. 25, 1925, ch. 326, 43 Stat. 981, related to entrants on ceded Indian reservations.

Section 187a, act June 21, 1934, ch. 690, 48 Stat. 1185, related to new homestead entry on ceded Indian reservations.

Section 187b, act May 22, 1902, ch. 821, §2, 32 Stat. 203, related to second homestead entry by certain settlers.

Section 188, act June 5, 1900, ch. 716, §3, 31 Stat. 270, related to purchaser of Flathead Indian land, Montana.

Section 189, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 131, §15, 18 Stat. 420, related to Indians abandoning tribal relations and consequences thereof.

Section 190, act July 4, 1884, ch. 180, §1, 23 Stat. 96, related to patents for Indians located on public lands.

Section 190a, act Mar. 1, 1933, ch. 160, §1, 47 Stat. 1418, related to Indian allotments or homesteads in San Juan County, Utah.

Section 191, R.S. §§2310, 2311, related to entry, etc., rights, of Stockbridge Munsee Indians.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §702, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2787, provided that the repeal made by section 702 is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976, except such effective date to be on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976, insofar as homestead laws apply to public lands in Alaska.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
### Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- 

### Directorate Identifier: 20 15 -CE-035-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?



### ORGANIZATION P ERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED QUEST Jamie Slippy Multiple Actions to be taken by Quest and design issues regarding unsafe condition.



### Other/ Additional Information:

9
§ 3.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 3.450.
FONTANELLA AND BABITTS
Certified Public Accountants                      534 Union Boulevard
                                                  Totowa Boro, New Jersey  07512
                                                  Tel:  (973) 595-5300
                                                  Fax: (973) 595-5890


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  into the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No.  333-119839)  of our report,  dated December 16,
2005, on the consolidated  financial statements of Roebling Financial Corp, Inc.
(the  "Registrant")  at and for the fiscal year ended  September  30, 2005 which
report is incorporated by reference into the Registrant's  Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.


                                            /s/ Fontanella and Babitts

December 22, 2005