alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hannah Chais et al., Respondents, v. Anthony Domena et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 8, 1960, which grants plaintiffs’ motion for reargument of their motion for summary judgment, and upon reargument grants said motion. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment denied. The record presents triable issues of fact. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices 

# Ord er

March 14, 2012

144686 & (7)

144691 & (9)

144768 & (25)

FRANK HOUSTON, EDNA FREIER,

CHRISTY JENSON, LORETTA COLEMAN,

JIM NASH, DAVID RICHARDS, and

ERIC COLEMAN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 144686

COA: 308725

Ingham CC: 12

- 000010

- CZ

G OVERNOR,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

FRANK HOUSTON, EDNA FREIER,

CHRISTY JENSON, LORETTA COLEMAN,

JIM NASH, DAVID RICHARDS, and

ERIC COLEMAN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees

,

v SC: 144691

COA: 308724

Ingham CC: 12

- 000010

- CZ

GOVERNOR,

Defendant,

and

OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/I, Corbin R. Da vis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 14, 2012

0314 2

FRANK HOUSTON, EDNA FREIER,

CHRISTY JENSON, LORETTA COL EMAN,

JIM NASH, DAVID RICHARDS, and

ERIC COLEMAN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 144768

COA: 308725

Ingham CC: 12

- 000010

- CZ

GOVERNOR,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

_______________________________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals (Docket No.

144686) is DENIED as moot. The application for leave to appeal before con sideration by

the Court of Appeals (Docket No. 144691) is treated as an application for leave to appeal

the March 7, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals. The applications for leave to

appeal the March 7, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals (Docket Nos . 144691 and

144768) are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on Wednesday,

March 21, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. on whether to grant the applications or take other action.

MCR 7.302(H)(1).
EXHIBIT
23.1







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-163677 on Form S-3 of our reports dated June 9, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Synutra
International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company")  (which report
expressed an unqualified opinion on the financial statement and financial
statement schedules and included an explanatory paragraph relating to the
adoption of new accounting standard related to presentation and disclosure
requirements for noncontrolling interests) and the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31,
2010.




/s/
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.




Shanghai,
China


June 9,
2010
### §3533a. Transferred

Section, Pub. L. 90–448, title XI, §1105(a), Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 567; Pub. L. 96–153, title VI, §603(a), Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1138, which established in Federal Emergency Management Agency position of Federal Insurance Administrator, was transferred to section 4129 of this title.
#### § 96.56 [Reserved]
### §§1191 to 1193. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792

Section 1191, R.S. §2471, related to falsely making or altering instruments concerning lands, mines, or minerals in California.

Section 1192, R.S. §2472, related to falsely dating evidence of title under Mexican authority to lands in California.

Section 1193, R.S. §2473, related to presenting false or counterfeited evidences of title to lands in California.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the repeal made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief
Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                               
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|March 31, 2010 |  | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz                       
|               |  | Robert K. Moskovitz                           
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
§ 241.1095 Application of payments. ( a ) The security instrument shall provide that all monthly payments to be made by the borrower shall be added together and the aggregate amount shall be paid by the borrower upon each monthly payment date in a single payment. The lender shall apply the payment in the following order: ( 1 ) Premium charges under the contact of insurance;
( 2 ) Interest on the loan; and
( 3 ) Amortization of the principal of the loan.
( b ) Any deficiency in the amount of any monthly payments required under paragraph (a) of this section shall constitute a default. The security instrument shall provide for a grace period of 30 days within which time the default must be cured.
§ 203.353 Certification by mortgagee. At the time of assignment of the mortgage, the mortgagee shall certify to the Commissioner that: ( a ) *Priority of mortgage to liens.* The mortgage is prior to all mechanics' and materialmen's liens filed of record, regardless of when such liens attach, and prior to all liens and encumbrances, or defects which may arise except such liens or other matters as may have been approved by the Commissioner;
( b ) *Amount due.* The amount stated in the instrument of assignment is actually due and owing under the mortgage;
( c ) *Offsets or counterclaims.* There are no offsets or counterclaims thereto and the mortgagee has a good right to assign.
§ 241.500 Definitions. In addition to the definitions contained in subpart A of this part, incorporated herein by reference, except § 241.1(f), (h) and (i), the following terms, as used in § 241.500 *et seq.,* shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Approved lender* means a financial institution or other mortgagee approved by the Commissioner as eligible for insurance under section 2 of the National Housing Act, or a mortgagee approved under section 203(b)(1) of the National Housing Act, or a state housing agency approved pursuant to 24 CFR 883.102.
( b ) *Borrower* means the owner of a project held in fee simple or of a leasehold interest which is not now covered by a mortgage insured or held by the Secretary.
( c ) *Energy saving loan* means any form of secured obligation used in connection with the purchase and installation of energy conserving improvements.
( d ) *Multifamily project* means a project which consists of not less than five dwelling units on one site, each such unit providing complete living facilities including provisions for cooking, eating, and sanitation within the unit and which is not now covered by a mortgage insured or held by the Secretary.
§ 94.6 Procedures for children abducted to the United States. The U.S. Central Authority, or an entity acting at its direction, shall perform the following operational functions with respect to all Hague Convention applications seeking the return of children wrongfully removed to or retained in the United States or seeking access to children in the United States: ( a ) Receive all applications seeking return of children wrongfully retained in the United States or seeking access to children in the United States;
( b ) Confirm the child's location or, where necessary, seek to ascertain its location;
( c ) Seek to ascertain the child's welfare through inquiry to the appropriate state social service agencies and, when necessary, consult with those agencies about the possible need for provisional arrangements to protect the child or to prevent the child's removal from the jurisdiction of the state;
( d ) Seek through appropriate authorities (such as state social service agencies or state attorneys general or prosecuting attorneys), where appropriate, to achieve a voluntary agreement for suitable visitation rights by the applicant or for return of the child;
( e ) Assist applicants in securing information useful for choosing or obtaining legal representation, for example, by providing a directory of lawyer referral services, or pro bono listing published by legal professional organizations, or the name and address of the state attorney general or prosecuting attorney who has expressed a willingness to represent parents in this type of case and who is employed under state law to intervene on the applicant's behalf;
( f ) Upon request, seek from foreign Central Authorities information relating to the social background of the child;
( g ) Upon request, seek from foreign Central Authorities information regarding the laws of the country of the child's habitual residence;
( h ) Upon request, seek from foreign Central Authorities a statement as to the wrongfulness of the taking of the child under the laws of the country of the child's habitual residence;
( i ) Upon request, seek a report on the status of court action when no decision has been reached by the end of six weeks;
( j ) Consult with appropriate agencies (such as state social service departments, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, state attorneys general) about possible arrangements for temporary foster care and/or return travel for the child from the United States;
( k ) Monitor all cases in which assistance has been sought and maintain records on the procedures followed in each case and its disposition;
( l ) Perform such additional functions as determined by the U.S. Central Authority, deemed advisable to maintain U.S. treaty compliance with the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
[53 FR 23608, June 23, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 66074, Dec. 21, 1995; 73 FR 47831, Aug. 15, 2008]
Case 3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document 142 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 1
U.S. Depc.-tment of 

Transportation 

OffiCe of the secretory 

at Transportation 

Memorandum 

Subject: Notice of Communication: 

(Docket: DOT-OST-20 14-0056) 

Date: June 3, 2015 

From: 

,.& Blane 

~/}11/ Workie, Assistant 

~ General Counsel 

To: Chief, Dockets 

In the notice of proposed rulemaking titled "Transparency of Airline Ancillary Fees and 

Other Consumer Protection Issues," (Consumer III NPRM), the Department stated that it 

"is considering whether carriers should be prohibited from restricting the information 

provided by ticket agents when those ticket agents do not sell air transportation directly 

to consumers but rather provide consumers with different airlines' flight information for 

comparison shopping." 79 FR 29970, 29974 (May 23, 2014). On t-.1ay 18, 2015, 

Department staff met with representatives of online travel agencies (OTAs) and 

metasearch travel sites and their outside counsel who urged the Department to consider 

taking enforcement action against airlines that restrict distribution of airline fa re and 

schedule information to metasearch sites fOi engaging in unfair methods of competition. 

Although the May 18"' discussion concerned enforcement, we are posting this 

memorandum in the rulernaking docket in the interest of full disclosure. 

The meeting participants were: 

Kathryn Thomson, 

Blane Workie, 

Jonathan Dols 

Kimberly Graber 

Jill Laptosky 

Claire McKenna 

Cindy Baraban 

Robert Goldner 

Todd Homan 

Carolyn Jameson 

Jason Park 

Craig Romaine 

Fiona Scott Morton 

DOT General Counsel 

DOT, Office of General Counsel 

DOT, Office of General Counsel 

DOT, Office of General Counsel 

DOT, Office of General Counsel 

DOT, Office of General Counsel 

DOT, Office of General Counsel 

Office of the Assistant Secretary Aviation and International 

Affairs 

Office of the Assistant Secretary Aviation and International 

Affairs 

Skyscanner 

Expedia 

Charles River Associates 

Yale University 
Stephen Shur 

Bryan Saltzburg 

David Morris 

Jennifer Trock 

Ken Quinn 

Travel Technology Association 

Trip Advisor 

Trip Advisor 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

A copy of a report titled "Benefits of Preserving Consumers' Ability to Compare Airline 

Fares" was also provided to the Department a day after this meeting. This report is also 

being placed in the docket.
Exhibit 10.1


 


VIRGIN
MEDIA INC.


909
Third Avenue


New
York, New York 10022


 


Mr. Mark
Schweitzer


[Address intentionally omitted]


 


May 12,
2010


 


Dear Mark,


 


Amendment Letter to your
Employment Agreement


 


Reference is made to
the employment agreement, dated as of September 18, 2007, between you and
Virgin Media Inc., and as amended by letter agreement, dated as of November 28,
2008, July 31, 2009 December 10, 2009 and February 4, 2010
between you and Virgin Media Inc. (the “Employment Agreement”).


 


In consideration of
the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable
consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree that the terms of the Employment Agreement will remain in
effect in all respects, except as follows:


 




	
  Unvested October stock
  options:

  	
   

  	
  The stock options
  issued to you under the Virgin Media Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan that are
  due to vest on October 1, 2010, namely:

   

  (i)    80,000 time-based options
  with an exercise price of $24.51 per share; and

   

  (ii)   15,000 performance-based options with an exercise price of $24.51 per
  share (performance is measured from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010),

   

  shall vest
  (subject to the satisfaction of the performance criteria, where relevant) on
  October 1, 2010, subject to your continued employment by the Company
  through June 30, 2010 (and notwithstanding your termination of
  employment on or after that date), and the options that thereby vest shall be
  exercisable through June 30, 2011.

   

  A Supplemental
  Option Notice for each of the 80,000 time-based options and the 15,000
  performance-based options has been enclosed with this letter.

  






 


1

















 


This letter confirms
our understanding on these matters and your Employment Agreement with the
Company is amended in accordance with the foregoing.  Terms used but not defined in this letter
shall have the meaning of such terms as defined in your Employment Agreement.


 


This letter shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of
New York (without regard, to the extent permitted by law, to any conflict of
law rules which might result in the application of laws of any other
jurisdiction).


 


 


	
   

  	
  Yours sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  VIRGIN
  MEDIA INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Bryan H. Hall

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Bryan H. Hall

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Secretary and
  General Counsel

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  AGREED &
  ACCEPTED:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Mark
  Schweitzer

  
	
   

  	
  Mark
  Schweitzer

  



 


2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Splinex Technology Inc.
550 West Cypress Creek Road-Suite 410
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, 33309 June 29, 2005 Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE Washington, DC 20549 Re: Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex Technology Inc.,
for the year ended March 31, 2005, I, Michael Stojda, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Splinex Technology Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex Technology Inc., for the year ended
March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex Technology
Inc., for the year ended March 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Splinex Technology Inc. BY: /S/ Michael StojdaMichael StojdaPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer andDuly Authorized Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within
the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Splinex Technology Inc. and will be retained by Splinex Technology Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. In accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is being furnished as Exhibit
32.1 to Splinex Technology Inc.s quarterly report and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under
the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference
in such a filing.
#### In the Matter of Peter Santos et al. v. Burton S. Goldstein.

Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Concur—Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 26.6 Department representative.

In each case heard before a hearing officer under this part, the Department shall be represented by attorneys from the Office of General Counsel.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2984 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2984

                    For the relief of Shpetim Daku.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2005

  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Shpetim Daku.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHPETIM DAKU.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Shpetim Daku shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Shpetim Daku enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall be 
considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Shpetim Daku, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Shpetim Daku 
shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, 
privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```