alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         100,206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,578
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,461
<PP&E>                                          63,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                (24,720)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,996
<SALES>                                         77,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,003
<CGS>                                           65,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,820
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,881
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael S. Wasik, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.





Date: 11/11/09





By:    /s/ Michael S. Wasik


Michael S. Wasik


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

NO. 98-CT-00417-SCT

NEW BELLUM HOMES, INC.

v.

KEITH AND BILLIE JEAN GIFFIN

McRAE, PRESIDING JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

This writer must respond to the personal assertions authored by the Chief Justice. The original opinion of

New Bellum Homes, Inc. v. Giffin, 784 So.2d 139 (Miss. 2001), was published February 1, 2001, in

which all but one Justice concurred at that time. Since then there have been two motions for rehearing, a

motion to clarify, and more importantly, our opinion has now been published in West over a year ago and

should have been deemed final. Our rules do not allow what has occurred with the majority's order of the

Chief Justice. The fifteen percent penalty was assessed according to the statute and the rules of this Court,

since the judgment below was affirmed in toto. The original opinion authored by this writer was reviewed

and voted on by the Court. No one asked for changes. When it was reviewed two other times on motion

for rehearing and clarification, the majority of the Court, including the Chief Justice, denied it. Now a year

and a half after the opinion was published and more than a year after the mandate was issued and in

contravention of our rules, this Court is now granting by order that which it denied in our published opinion.

One Justice cannot single handedly do anything; it takes a majority.

Accordingly, I dissent to this order as we should not give special treatment to individuals or certain parties.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,849,900
<SECURITIES>                                 7,906,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,618,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,761,500
<PP&E>                                       1,366,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 441,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,339,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,056,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,281,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,339,300
<SALES>                                      6,376,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,376,700
<CGS>                                          700,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  700,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,850,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,432,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,433,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,433,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.38)



</TABLE>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00304

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF FLO RENE K. GRACE, DECEA SED

From the County Court at Law No

. 1 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 12,787

- PC

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The memorandum opinion of the Court dated December 14, 2011 is withdrawn,
and the following memorandum opinion is substituted therefor.
Appellant William R. Vance , Jr. has filed a notice that he filed a bankruptcy
proceeding on September 13, 2011. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1. Further action in this appeal
has been automatically stayed. See 11 U.S.C. § 362.
For administrative purposes, this appeal is suspended and will be treated as
closed unless reinstated on a proper motion. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2. It may be reinstated on motion of any party showing that the stay has been lifted or modified and specifying
what action, if any, is required from this Court upon reinstatement of the appeal. T EX

.
R. A PP

. P. 8.3.In the Estate of Grace Page 2

The reporting requirement of Local Rule 17 is suspended. 10 TH T EX

. A PP

. (W ACO )

L OC

. R. 17. The Clerk of this Court is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion to the
attorneys of record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.

AL SCOGGINS Justice

Before Justice Davis, Justice Scoggins, and Judge Pozza 1 Appeal suspended Opinion delivered and filed December 21 , 2011 [CV06 ]

1 The Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge of the 407 th District Court, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas pursuant to section 74.003(a) of the Government Code. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 74003( a) (Vernon 2005).
§ 521.4 Investigation. ( a ) If an investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) is warranted— ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued shall notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued, and shall identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving such subpoena shall be required to tender to the investigating official or the person designated to receive the documents a certification that the documents sought have been produced, or that such documents are not available and the reasons therefore, or that such documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of such investigation to the reviewing official.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall preclude or limit an investigating official's discretion to refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to defer or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of an investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.
#### § 96.17 Effective date of accreditation and approval requirements.

The Convention entered into force for the United States on April 1, 2008. As of that date, the regulations in subpart C of this part govern Convention adoptions between the United States and Convention countries, and require agencies or persons providing adoption services on behalf of prospective adoptive parent(s) to comply with § 96.12 and applicable Federal regulations. The Secretary maintains for the public a current listing of Convention countries. The effective date of the UAA is July 14, 2014. As of that date, consistent with the UAA, the regulations in subpart C of this part will govern adoptions of children described in INA § 101(b)(1)(F), and will require agencies or persons providing adoption services on behalf of prospective adoptive parent(s) in connection with a child described in section 101(b)(1)(F) to comply with § 96.12 and applicable Federal regulations.

[79 FR 40634, July 14, 2014]
### §§1100 to 1102g. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 1100, acts Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 772, §1, 60 Stat. 872; Sept 22, 1950, ch. 983, 64 Stat. 903, granting of patents to certain lands south of Cimarron base line in Oklahoma and north of north line of Texas.

Section 1101, act Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 772, §2, 60 Stat. 872, related to relinquishment by United States of title to townsite plots.

Section 1102, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §1, 69 Stat. 445, related to management and disposition of lands conveyed to United States by Choctaw Nation.

Section 1102a, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §2, 69 Stat. 445, authorized certain powers in Secretary to facilitate administration of such lands.

Section 1102b, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §3, 69 Stat. 446, related to sale or leasing of lands to Oklahoma or other agency.

Section 1102c, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §4, 69 Stat. 446, related to issuance of quitclaim deeds and reservation of mineral deposits.

Section 1102d, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §5, 69 Stat. 446, related to granting of easements, leases or permits for nonmineral resources.

Section 1102e, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §6, 69 Stat. 446, related to acceptance of contributions, donations, etc.

Section 1102f, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §7, 69 Stat. 447, related to issuance of regulations by Secretary of the Interior.

Section 1102g, act Aug. 3, 1955, ch. 498, §8, 69 Stat. 447, related to deposit of moneys received into Treasury.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
No. 81-517 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1982 

DAN BUKVICH, KATIE J'IURFtAY 

and LEO JACOBSEN, 

Plaintiffs and Appellants, 

BUTTE-SILVER BOW, a political 

subdivision of the State of 

Montana, and DONALD PEOPLES, et al., 

Defendants and Respondents. 

Appeal from: District Court of the Second Judicial District, 

In and for the County of Silver Bow 

Honorable Robert Boyd, Judge presiding. 

Counsel of Recprd: 

For Appellants: 

Jardine, McCarthy & Grauman, Whitehall, Montana 

John Jardine argued, Whitehall, Montana 

For Respondents: 

Robert McCarthy argued, County Attorney, Butte, Montana 

Ross P. Richardson argued, Deputy County Attorney, 

Butte, Montana 

Submitted: July 15, 1982 

Decided: September 9, 1982 

Filed: ijkp 3 I982 
Mr. Justice Gene B. Daly delivered the following Opinion of the 

Court. 

This case centers around a pay dispute between the appellants, 

Dan Bukvich, the clerk of the District Court, Katie Murray, the 

auditor, and Leo Jacobsen, the coroner; and respondents, 

Butte-Silver BOW, a political subdivision of the State of 

Montana, Don Peoples, its chief executive, and its active council 

of commissioners. 

Appellants are duly elected and qualified officials of 

Butte-Silver Bow. They contend that their salaries were fixed by 

the passage of resolution no. 325 and not ordinance no. 134, as 

the respondents contend. 

Appellants petitioned the District Court for a writ of mandate to require the respondents to pay the salaries as set out in 

the resolution. 

Respondents filed a motion to dismiss and a motion to quash 

appellants' petition for a writ of mandate. The District Court 

granted both motions and this appeal ensued. 

The sole issue here is whether the District Court erred in 

granting respondents' motion to dismiss and motion to quash 

appellants' petition for a writ of mandate. 

This Court is unable to make any determination on this issue 

at this time because the record on appeal is incomplete. The 

resolution is a key in this situation and in looking at the 

record we are unable to tell what was contained in it or how it 

was passed. Without this information, it is impossible for us to 

render a decision. 

We, therefore, order that the lower court proceedings be 

vacated and that a hearing be held to determine exactly what this 

so-called resolution is and the manner in which it was passed. 
This case is remanded for further proceedings to be 

conducted in accord with this opinion. 

We concur: 

PA&$. y,& 

Chief Justice
§ 247.1 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in §§ 247.5 and 247.6(c), the provisions of this subpart shall apply to all decisions by a landlord to terminate the occupancy of a tenant in a subsidized project as defined in § 247.2(e). (Termination of tenancy of a family assisted with tenant-based assistance under the Housing Voucher Program is not subject to this part.)
( b ) Landlords of subsidized projects that have been assisted under a covered housing program listed in 24 CFR 5.2003 must comply with 24 CFR part 5, subpart L (Protection for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, or Stalking), as described in § 200.38.
[54 FR 236, Jan. 4, 1989, as amended at 81 FR 80806, Nov. 16, 2016; 89 FR 38290, May 7, 2024]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2991 

To prohibit United States foreign assistance from being provided to any 

country that refuses to extradite to the United States individuals accused 

of killing law enforcement officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. MCHENRY (for himself and Mr. BEAUPREZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit United States foreign assistance from being provided to any country that refuses to extradite to the 

United States individuals accused of killing law enforcement officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PROVISION OF UNITED 

4 STATES FOREIGN ASSISTANCE TO CERTAIN 

5 COUNTRIES. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—No United States foreign assist7 ance may be provided to any country the government of 

8 which refuses to extradite to the United States, upon the 
2 

•HR 2991 IH 

1 request of the United States Government, any individual 

2 accused in the United States of killing a law enforcement 

3 officer. 

4 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

5 (1) UNITED STATES FOREIGN ASSISTANCE.— 

6 The term ‘‘United States foreign assistance’’ means 

7 assistance under the foreign operations, export fi8 nancing, and related programs appropriations Act 

9 for a fiscal year, and assistance under the Foreign 

10 Assistance Act of 1961. 

11 (2) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.—The term 

12 ‘‘law enforcement officer’’ means an individual in13 volved in crime and juvenile delinquency control or 

14 reduction, or enforcement of the laws, for the United 

15 States Government, the government of a State or 

16 the District of Columbia, or a local government, in17 cluding, but not limited to, police, corrections, pro18 bation, parole, and judicial officers. 

Æ
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
      906
              OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern Light Capital, Incorporated (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Richard J. Wrensen, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and I,
Andrea Barney, Principal Accounting Officer and Controller of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully compiles with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
November 13, 2009


/s/ Richard J.
Wrensen


Richard J. Wrensen


President, Chief Executive Officer
and


Chief Financial Officer








/s/ Andrea
Barney


Andrea Barney


Principal Accounting Officer and
Controller
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00217

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.C. , A.C. III, and S.P.A.C., Children

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00580

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs ar e taxed in this appeal.

Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED.

SIGNED July 31, 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TICE TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          80,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    626,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               880,857
<PP&E>                                         704,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                 533,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,311,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          599,892
<BONDS>                                      1,418,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       106,119
<OTHER-SE>                                   (812,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,311,617
<SALES>                                        110,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,655
<CGS>                                          152,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  488,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (360,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (317,863)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (366,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2908

To suspend temporarily the duty on diuron. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on diuron.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DIURON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.05.70 formulated product(s) containing mixtures of the active ingredient [3-(3,4-

dichlorophenyl)–1,1-

dimethylurea] and application adjuvants (CAS No. 

330–54–1) (provided for in 

subheading 3808.30.15) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2908 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ