alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 220.751 Cross-reference. ( a ) All of the provisions of subpart B, part 207, of this chapter, covering mortgages insured under section 207 of the National Housing Act, apply with full force and effect to multifamily project mortgages insured under section 220 of the National Housing Act, except § 207.256b Modification of mortgage terms.
( b ) For the purposes of the portion of this subpart, covering multifamily project mortgages, all references in part 207 of this chapter to section 207 of the National Housing Act shall be deemed to refer to section 220 of the National Housing Act.
[36 FR 24573, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 80 FR 51468, Aug. 25, 2015]
#### BUSHA v. ALICE FALLS CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 4, 1905.)

Action by Mary E. Busha, as administratrix of Fred N. Busha, deceased, against the Alice Falls Company. No opinion. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 13**

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United Sates Code), eachof the undersigned officers of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”),does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

TheAnnual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|                           |   | /s/ Gerardo de Nicolás Gutiérrez |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Dated: June 29, 2006 |   | Gerardo de Nicolás Gutiérrez     |   |   |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer                    |   |   |
|                      |   |                                       |   |   |
|                      |   | /s/ Mario Alberto Gonzalez Padilla         |   |   |
| Dated: June 29, 2006 |   | Mario Alberto Gonzalez Padilla             |   |   |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer                    |   |   |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request

----

 

----
No. 07-13-00361-CV

Wesley Schreiber, as Trustee for the

Schreiber Family Trust

Appellant

v.

Sam Cole and Wendy Cole

Appellees §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law No 2

of McLennan County

May 19, 2015

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated May 19, 2015

, it is ordered, adjudged

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which

let execution issue.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Martin LIMA-PACHECO, Appellant.

No. 06-3184.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 2007.

Filed: May 29, 2007.

John James Ware, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.

Caterina M. Ditraglia, Federal Public Defender’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Martin Lima-Pacheco, Big Spring, TX, pro se.

Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Martin Lima-Pacheco pleaded guilty to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Having calculated a Guidelines imprisonment range of 70-87 months, the district court1 sentenced him to 75 months. Lima-Pacheco appeals, arguing that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court did not consider relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors that should have received significant weight. We disagree. *See United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 261-62, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (appellate review for unreasonableness).

The record shows that the district court properly considered the undisputed advisory Guidelines range, the nature of the offense, the defendant’s circumstances and history (including repeated unlawful entries, deportations, and imprisonment), sentencing objectives (especially deterrence), and the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities. We hold that the sentence the district court then imposed is *413not unreasonable. *See United States v. Davidson,*437 F.3d 737, 741 (8th Cir.2006) (addressing consideration of § 3553(a) factors); *United States v. Sebastian,*436 F.3d 913, 915-16 (8th Cir.2006) (with regard to determination “that certain disparities are warranted,” recognizing both Congress’s policymaking power and Attorney General’s prosecutorial discretion).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
### §316c. Alteration of grazing districts

After any district is established the area embraced therein may be altered in any of the following ways:

(1) The Secretary may add to such districts any public lands which, in his opinion, should be made a part of the district.

(2) The Secretary, subject to existing rights of any lessee, may exclude from such district any lands which he determines are no longer valuable for grazing purposes or are more valuable for other purposes.

(3) The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreement with any person, in respect of the administration, as a part of a district, of lands owned by such person which are contiguous or adjacent to such district or any part thereof.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 513, §4, 44 Stat. 1452.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 471c of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
4 minutes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL PRETRIAL MINUTES

Date: 12/4/15

Case No. C-08-5221 SI Judge: SUSAN ILLSTON

Title: RIDGEWAY -v- WAL-MART 

 

Attorneys for Pltf: Andy Jones, Butch Wagner,

Attorneys for Deft: Jessie Cripps, Dan Kopfman, Jenna Yott (in person)

Deputy Clerk: Tracy Kasamoto Court Reporter: n/a

PROCEEDINGS

1) Further Case Management Conference - HELD by phone (except for Ms. Yott) 

2) 

3) 

Order to be prepared by: ( )Pltf ( )Deft ( )Court

Disposition : ( ) GRANTED, ( ) DENIED, ( ) GRANTED/DENIED IN ( ) SUBMITTED

 PART

Case continued to 3/16/16 @ 3 p.m. for Further Case Management Conference

ORDERED AFTER HEARING: 

 The Court accepted the trial schedule as set forth by defendant on page two of the case management

conference statement.

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 241 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 1
### §361. Authority to explore for, develop, and mark water holes, etc.

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized and empowered, in his discretion in so far as the authorization made herein will permit, to discover, develop, protect, and render more accessible for the benefit of the general public, springs, streams, and water holes on arid public lands of the United States; and in connection therewith to erect and maintain suitable and durable monuments and signboards at proper places and intervals along and near the accustomed lines of travel and over the general area of said desert lands, containing information and directions as to the location and nature of said springs, streams, and water holes, to the end that the same may be more readily traced and found by persons in search or need thereof; also to provide convenient and ready means, apparatus, and appliances by which water may be brought to the earth's surface at said water holes for the use of such persons; also to prepare and distribute suitable maps, reports, and general information relating to said springs, streams, and water holes, and their specific location with reference to lines of travel.

(Aug. 21, 1916, ch. 360, §1, 39 Stat. 518.)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2855

To extend the suspension of duty on Oxalic Anilide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To extend the suspension of duty on Oxalic Anilide.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OXALIC ANILIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.13 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N′-(2-ethylphenyl)-) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/

8 31/2008’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2855 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4942]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes From the Collection 
of the Fitzwilliam Museum, University of Cambridge''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Renaissance and Baroque Bronzes From the 
Collection of the Fitzwilliam Museum, University of Cambridge'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner. I also determine that the 
exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the The Frick 
Collection, New York, New York, from on or about February 15, 2005 to 
on or about April 24, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr R. Sulzynsky, the Office 
of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, (telephone: 202/453-8050). 
The address is: Department of State, SA-44, and 301 4th Street, SW., 
Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: December 20, 2004.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-28393 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
### **CHAPTER 13—FEDERAL LANDS INCLUDED IN STATE IRRIGATION DISTRICTS**

Sec.
621.
Subjection of lands in State irrigation district to State laws generally.
622.
Cost of construction and maintenance of irrigation project as charge on land.
623.
Map of district and plan of irrigation project; approval by Secretary.
624.
Entry of approval on land records.
625.
Release of unentered land from lien on noncompletion of irrigation project.
626.
Enforcement of lien against entered but unpatented land.
627.
Sale of unpatented and unentered land prohibited; suspension of entry.
628.
Patents to entered but unpatented land.
629.
Delivery of notices required by State law; right to hearing, appeal, etc.
630.
Disposition by Government of proceeds of land sold.
#### LANGE, Respondent, v. ROSEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Action by Isadore Lange against Abraham Rosen.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed by default, with costs.
Skip to main content

National Institutes of Health

sML

        - Home
        - Health Info
        - Research
        - Funding
        - News & Events
        - About Us
        - A–Z Index

HomeHealth InfoInformación en español¡Me gusta lo que escucho!index_sp

# ¡Me gusta lo que escucho! 

## Guía para los maestros de tercero a sexto grado

Las actividades en este portal están diseñadas para los maestros con alumnos de tercero a sexto grado. Estas actividades se pueden adaptar fácilmente para ser usadas con los niños más grandes y los más pequeños.

Las actividades están diseñadas para:
          - ayudar a los alumnos a comprender la importancia de conservar la audición y el problema de la pérdida de la audición inducida por el ruido, 
          - introducir y reforzar la comprensión científica de la audición y de la ciencia del sonido, y 
          - proveer oportunidades para que los alumnos puedan influir el conocimiento y la comprensión de otras personas. 

Todas las actividades se han usado con éxito dentro del aula. Los materiales para el Internet y los materiales para el aula pueden ser duplicados para uso educativo—por favor ¡cópielos!

### Tabla de contenidos

          - Introducción 
          - Audición 
          - Actividades 
          - Sonidos comunes 
          - Materiales para difusión 
          - Fuentes 

Arriba

            - Print this page
            - Order free publications
            - Find other organizations

## También Disponible En:

          - Ingles
#### In the Matter of Union Mortgagee Corp. et al., Petitioners, v Mario Cuomo, as Secretary of State of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Secretary of State, dated February 27, 1976, as, after a hearing, held that the petitioners had demonstrated incompetency (see Real Property Law, § 441-c) and suspended their real estate brokers’ licenses for one year, or in lieu thereof fined each $1,500. Determination confirmed insofar as reviewed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that petitioners had demonstrated incompetency. The other arguments raised by the petitioners are without merit. Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### (A) In the Matter of Alice R. Gammon v. Carl J. Costantino, as Probation Director of Niagara County. (B) Schober & Savage Co., Inc., v. David Rose et al. (C) In the Matter of Chester Pisarek et al. Joseph F. *872Sikora. (D) Edward C. St. Clair v. Yonkers Raceway, Inc., et al. (E) Earl C. Sylvandee et al. v. Farmers and Traders Life Ins. Co.

[In each action] Motion denied to add case to May Calendar.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Erna Ball, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, unless appellant perfects appeal, files note of issue, and files and serves record and brief on or before August 1, I960 and is ready for argument at the September Term of this court, in which event the motion is denied. Present — Bergan, P, J,, Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
§ 115.306 Training funds. ( a ) All agencies, including agencies that receive CB funds, are eligible to receive training funds. Training funds are fixed amounts based on the number of agency employees to be trained. Training funds shall be allocated based on the FHAP appropriation. Training funds may be used only for HUD-approved or HUD-sponsored training. Agency-initiated training or other formalized training may be included in this category. However, such training must first be approved by the CAO and the GTR. Specifics on the amount of training funds that an agency will receive and, if applicable, amounts that may be deducted, will be set out in the cooperative agreement each year.
( b ) Each agency must send staff to mandatory FHAP training sponsored by HUD, including, but not necessarily limited to, the National Fair Housing Training Academy and the National Fair Housing Policy Conference. If the agency does not participate in mandatory HUD-approved and HUD-sponsored training, training funds will be deducted from the agency's overall training amount. All staff of the agency responsible for the administration and enforcement of the fair housing law must participate in HUD-approved or HUD-sponsored training each year.
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 2

to the

AMENDED AND RESTATED

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          AMENDMENT (“Amendment No. 2”) dated the 9th day of November, 2010, by and between Polo Ralph
Lauren Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Ralph Lauren (the “Executive”).




          WHEREAS, the Executive currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to an Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive dated March 30, 2008, which was amended on
June 29, 2009 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); and




          WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to further amend the Employment Agreement in
certain respects;




          NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be bound, the parties hereby agree as follows.




 


			
	 	1.	
    Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to
such terms in the Employment Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement
that are not modified below shall continue to remain in full force and effect.

	 
	 	2.	Section 5(d) of the Employment Agreement is amended to add the following sentence at the
end of the paragraph:






          “Commencing in the Company’s fiscal year 2011 and continuing for the remaining fiscal
years of the Term, the Company shall reimburse Executive up to a maximum aggregate amount of
$200,000 for any expense incurred as a result of Executive’s use of his private aircraft, or
other acceptable private aircraft, for personal travel.



          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be duly executed and the
Executive has hereunto set his hand, on the date first set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Joel Fleishman
 	 
	 	 	Joel Fleishman, 	 
	 	 	Chairman of the Compensation &

Organizational
Development Committee 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE

 	 
	 	/s/ Ralph Lauren
 	 
	 	Ralph Lauren
### §3172. Termination or modification of economic development districts

The Secretary shall, by regulation, promulgate standards for the termination or modification of the designation of economic development districts.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title IV, §402, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3609.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3172, Pub. L. 89–136, title IV, §404, as added Pub. L. 93–423, §8, Sept. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1162; amended Pub. L. 94–487, title I, §116, Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2335; Pub. L. 96–506, §1(8), Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2745; Pub. L. 97–35, title XVIII, §1821(a)(7), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 766, authorized additional appropriations for Indian economic development, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(a).

A prior section 402 of Pub. L. 89–136 was classified to section 3162 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the third quarter ended September 30, 1998 contained in
the company's Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
report on form.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          59,701
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (871)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,325
<PP&E>                                          17,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,348)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,348
<SALES>                                         85,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,303
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,643
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
### §9653. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–499, title V, §511(b), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1761

Section, Pub. L. 96–510, title III, §303, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2808, provided for termination of authority to collect taxes under this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1987, see section 511(c) of Pub. L. 99–499, set out as an Effective Date of 1986 Amendment note under section 4611 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document168-1 Filed04/29/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document 179 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 2
Case3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document168-1 Filed04/29/10 Page2 of 2

May 3, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document 179 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 5—LAND DISTRICTS**

Sec.
121.
Discontinuance of land offices by President.
122.
Discontinuance of land offices by Secretary of the Interior.
123.
Continuance of land offices when required by public convenience.
123a.
Continuation of existing land districts and offices in Alaska; change of district boundaries, or discontinuance of districts; designation and location of land offices.
124.
Consolidation of land offices.
125.
Annexation of discontinued district to adjacent district.
126.
Change of location of land offices.
127.
Change of boundaries of land districts.
128.
Division or change of boundaries; continuance of business of original district.
129.
Office rent and clerk hire for consolidated land offices.
130.
Entry of public lands in States where no land offices exist.