alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif.

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2007-1306Version 1.0

# Gravity Data from Newark Valley, White Pine County, Nevada

### *By* Edward A. Mankinen and Edwin H. McKee

#### 2007

*Photograph taken in northern Newark Valley looking west toward the Diamond Mountains.*

The Newark Valley area, eastern Nevada is one of thirteen major ground-water basins investigated by the BARCAS (Basin and Range Carbonate Aquifer Study) Project.  Gravity data are being used to help characterize the geophysical framework of the region.  Although gravity coverage was extensive over parts of the BARCAS study area, data were sparse for a number of the valleys, including the northern part of Newark Valley.  We addressed this lack of data by establishing seventy new gravity stations in and around Newark Valley.  All available gravity data were then evaluated to determine their reliability, prior to calculating an isostatic residual gravity map to be used for subsequent analyses.  A gravity inversion method was used to calculate depths to pre-Cenozoic basement rock and estimates of maximum alluvial/volcanic fill.  The enhanced gravity coverage and the incorporation of lithologic information from several deep oil and gas wells yields a view of subsurface shape of the basin and will provide information useful for the development of hydrogeologic models for the region.

----

Download this report as a 21-page PDF file (of2007-1306.pdf; 1.8 MB).

Download Table 1 as a .xls spreadsheet.  This table contains gravity data obtained during the course of this study, and their associated parameters (of2007-1306_table1.xls; 24 kB).

Download Table 1 as a .csv document.  This is an ASCII comma-separated-value file of the same data linked above (of2007-1306_table1.csv; 8 kB).

For questions about the content of this report, contact Ed Mankinen

Version history

----

Download a copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader for free.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2007 || Geologic Division | Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif. (GUMP) |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1306/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: October 2, 2007
Exhibit 31.2 CFO Certification

I, Kenneth A. Phillips, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Fleetclean Systems, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004


/s/ Kenneth A. Phillips
-----------------------
Kenneth A. Phillips
Chief Financial Officer
§ 513.620 Effect of violation. ( a ) In the event of a violation of this subpart as provided in § 513.615, and in accordance with applicable law, the grantee shall be subject to one or more of the following actions: ( 1 ) Suspension of payments under the grant;
( 2 ) Suspension or termination of the grant; and
( 3 ) Suspension or debarment of the grantee under the provisions of this part.
( b ) Upon issuance of any final decision under this part requiring debarment of a grantee, the debarred grantee shall be ineligible for award of any grant from any Federal agency for a period specified in the decision, not to exceed five years (*see* § 513.320(a)(2) of this part).
### SUBCHAPTER XXVI—SAN ANGELO PROJECT, TEXAS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,982,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                   167,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,010,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,487,850
<PP&E>                                       1,386,215
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,208,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,843,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,687,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,994
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,843,704
<SALES>                                      5,815,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,815,042
<CGS>                                        4,188,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,188,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,299,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                159,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                   108,490
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .003
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 2967

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott Street in Detroit, 

Michigan, as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building located at 333 Mt. Elliott Street in Detroit, 

Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rosa Parks Federal Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Rosa 

Parks Federal Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 1, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00823

- CR

Jake Eric ALVARADO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 04

- 12822

- CR

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 1st day of August, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2993 

To provide for the sale of excess wild free-roaming horses and burros. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. PORTER (for himself, Ms. BERKLEY, and Mr. GIBBONS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the sale of excess wild free-roaming horses 

and burros. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Free-Roaming 

5 Horses and Burros Sale and Adoption Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SALE AND ADOPTION OF WILD FREE-ROAMING 

7 HORSES AND BURROS. 

8 Section 3 of Public Law 92–195 (16 U.S.C. 1333) 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (b)(2)— 
2 

•HR 2993 IH 

1 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘: 

2 Provided’’ and all that follows through ‘‘adopt3 ing party’’; and 

4 (B) by striking subparagraph (C) and in5 serting the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) Additional excess wild free-roaming 

7 horses and burros for which an adoption de8 mand by qualified individuals does not exist 

9 shall be sold under subsection (e).’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (c)— 

11 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘LIMITED

12 NUMBER OF’’; and 

13 (B) in the text, by striking ‘‘not more than 

14 four animals’’ and inserting ‘‘excess animals 

15 transferred’’; 

16 (3) in subsection (e)— 

17 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking subpara18 graph (A) and inserting the following: 

19 ‘‘(A) the Secretary determines that there is 

20 no adoption demand from qualified individuals 

21 for the excess animal;’’; 

22 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘without 

23 limitation’’; and 

24 (C) by striking paragraph (4) and insert25 ing the following: 
3 

•HR 2993 IH 

1 ‘‘(4) EFFECT OF SALE.—At the end of a 1-year 

2 period following the sale of any excess animal under 

3 this subsection— 

4 ‘‘(A) the Secretary shall grant to the 

5 transferee title to the excess animal; and 

6 ‘‘(B) the excess animal transferred shall no 

7 longer be considered to be a wild free-roaming 

8 horse or burro for purposes of this Act.’’; and 

9 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(f) MINIMUM FEES AND BIDS.—The minimum 

11 adoption fee required under this section shall be $25.’’. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2710 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2710

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-
   [[4-chloro-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]ami no]-4-
 hydroxy-3-[[4-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]- , sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-
   [[4-chloro-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]ami no]-4-
 hydroxy-3-[[4-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]- , sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 5-[[4-CHLORO-6-[(3-
              SULFOPHENYL)AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-YL]AMINO]-4-HYDROXY-3-
              [[4-[[2-(SULFOOXY)ETHYL]SULFONYL]PHENYL]AZO]-, SODIUM 
              SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.15      2,7-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Naphthalenedisulf                                                  31/2008
                         onic acid, 5-[[4-
                         chloro-6-[(3-
                         sulfophenyl)amino
                         ]-1,3,5-triazin-2-
                         yl]amino]-4-
                         hydroxy-3-[[4-[[2-
                         (sulfooxy)ethyl]s
                         ulfonyl]phenyl]az
                         o]-, sodium salt.
                         (CAS No. 78952-61-
                         1) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 09-01550 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE REGARDING

DEFENDANT AT&T INC.’S

MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD

PARTY COMPLAINT

This matter is set for a hearing on July 23, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. on the motion to dismiss

filed by Third-Party Defendant AT&T Inc. The opposition to this motion shall be filed by no

later than May 14, 2010 and the reply, if any, shall be filed by no later than May 21, 2010.

If the Court determines that this matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument,

it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this

schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed order

demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 30, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document 177 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 203.318 Notice of termination by mortgagee.

No contract of insurance shall be terminated until the mortgagee has given written notice thereof to the Commissioner within 15 calendar days from the occurrence of one of the approved methods of termination set forth in this subpart.

[45 FR 31716, May 14, 1980]
### §158. Mineral resources on withdrawn lands; disposition and exploration

All withdrawals or reservations of public lands for the use of any agency of the Department of Defense, except lands withdrawn or reserved specifically as naval petroleum, naval oil shale, or naval coal reserves, heretofore or hereafter made by the United States, shall be deemed to be subject to the condition that all minerals, including oil and gas, in the lands so withdrawn or reserved are under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior and there shall be no disposition of, or exploration for, any minerals in such lands except under the applicable public land mining and mineral leasing laws: Provided, That no disposition of, or exploration for, any minerals in such lands shall be made where the Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, determines that such disposition or exploration is inconsistent with the military use of the lands so withdrawn or reserved.

(Pub. L. 85–337, §6, Feb. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 30.)
### §1200d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 6, 1954, ch. 463, §7, 68 Stat. 453, which related to construction of former sections 1198 to 1200e of this title, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
About

          Fish and Wildlife

          Energy

          Reports

          News

          Contact

        About

        Fish and Wildlife

        Energy

        Reports

        News

        Contact

        - Home
        - Fish and Wildlife
        - Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)
        -     

# Addendum for Moses Lake proposal

## 

        -  Sep 18, 2001 
        - Erik Merrill
        - ISRP 2000-9 addendum

read full document >

In its Intermountain provincial review decisions, the Council decided to address the ISRP's "do not fund" recommendation for the Moses Lake Recreational Fishery proposal (see attachment 1 for ISRP FY01 review) by providing the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife the opportunity to revise the proposal further to address the ISRP's final comments. WDFW committed to review the project design at its state level. On that basis the Council agreed to seek additional ISRP review of the revised proposal. The ISRP's review of WDFW's revised project design is provided here.		Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.comments powered by DisqusAbout- Background
- Press Resources
- Employment
- Policies
- Staff and offices
Reports- Power Plan
- Fish and Wildlife Program
- Subbasin Plans
- Financial Reports
- Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
- Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)
- Independent Economic Advisory Board (IEAB)
Contact- Council Members
- Committees
- Central Office
- Idaho Office
- Montana Office
- Oregon Office
- Washington Office
Fish and Wildlife- Program
- Reviews and Recommendations
- Fish Passage Center Oversight Board
- Fish Tagging Forum
- Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
- Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
- Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)
- Monitoring, Evaluation, Research & Reporting (MERR)
- Wildlife Advisory Committee
- Wildlife Crediting Forum
- High Level Indicators
- Ocean and Plume Science Management Forum
- Protected Areas
- Archives
News- Press releases
- Meetings
- Blog
- Newsletters
Energy- Power Planning
- Energy Efficiency
- Power Supply
- Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
- Demand Forecasting Advisory Committee
- Demand Response
- Generating Resources Advisory Committee
- Hydro Supply Curves
- Natural Gas Advisory Committee
- Northwest Energy Efficiency Task Force
- Northwest Wind Integration Forum
- Regional Technical Forum (RTF)
- Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
- Resource Strategies Advisory Committee
- System Analysis Advisory Committee (SAAC)

                            851 S.W. Sixth Avenue, Suite 1100                                                        Portland, OR 97204                            503-222-5161 | 800-452-5161                            [email protected]

                            Enter your email to receive news.
                                Join us here:- Twitter
- Facebook
- Vimeo
- Flickr
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 17.2 Administrative claim; when presented; appropriate HUD office. ( a ) For purposes of this subpart, a claim shall be deemed to have been presented when the Department receives, at a place designated in paragraph (b) of this section, an executed *Claim for Damages or Injury,* Standard Form 95, or other written notification of an incident, accompanied by a claim for money damages in a sum certain for injury to or loss of property, for personal injury, or for death alleged to have occurred by reason of the incident. A claim which should have been presented to the Department, but which was mistakenly addressed to or filed with another Federal agency, is deemed to be presented to the Department as of the date that the claim is received by the Department. If a claim is mistakenly addressed to or filed with the Department, the Department shall forthwith transfer it to the appropriate Federal agency, if ascertainable, or return it to the claimant.
( b ) A claimant shall mail or deliver his claim to the office of employment of the Department employee or employees whose negligent or wrongful act or omission is alleged to have caused the loss or injury complained of. Where such office of employment is the Department Central Office in Washington, or is not reasonably known and not reasonably ascertainable, claimant shall file his claim with the Assistant Secretary for Administration, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410. In all other cases, claimant shall address his claim to the head of the appropriate office, the address of which will generally be found listed in the local telephone directory.
#### Matt Jaffe Associates, Ltd., et al., Appellants, v George Construction Co., Inc., Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 30, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Stecher, J., at Special Term. The respondent shall recover of the appellants one bill of $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal (to include Appeal No. 2397 decided simultaneously with this appeal). Concur— Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
### §1095. Reservations between sections for highway purposes

There shall be reserved public highways four rods wide between each section of land in said former Territory of Oklahoma, the section lines being the center of said highways; but no deduction shall be made, where cash payments are provided for, in the amount to be paid for each quarter section of land by reason of such reservation. But if the said highway shall be vacated by any competent authority, the title to the respective strips shall inure to the then owner of the tract of which it formed a part by the original survey.

(May 2, 1890, ch. 182, §23, 26 Stat. 92.)