alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), I, Michael G. Long, Chief Financial Officer of Edge Petroleum
Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

         (1)      the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
                  period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 14, 2003          /s/ Michael G. Long
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Michael G. Long
                                          Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
§ 266.510 HFA responsibilities. ( a ) *Inspections.* The HFA must perform inspections in accordance with the physical inspection procedures in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G (Physical Condition Standards and Inspection Requirements).
( b ) *Annual audits of projects.* The HFA must analyze projects' annual audits and provide a copy to HUD along with a summary of unresolved findings and actions planned, with target dates, to correct unresolved findings.
( c ) *HFA's annual financial statement.* The HFA must provide HUD with annual audited financial statement in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.
[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 63 FR 46578, Sept. 1, 1998; 65 FR 16296, Mar. 27, 2000; 80 FR 75936, Dec. 7, 2015; 85 FR 83444, Dec. 22, 2020]
Exhibit 11

                     METRIS COMPANIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        Computation of Earnings Per Share

In thousands, except per-share amounts              Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                            2003      2002
BASIC:
------

Net income (loss) .....................................   $(24,958)  $52,340
                                                          ========   =======

Weighted-average common shares outstanding ............     57,257    62,188
Assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock (1)..         --    33,844
                                                          --------  --------
Basic common shares ...................................     57,257    96,032
                                                          ========   =======

Net income (loss) per share ...........................   $  (0.61)  $  0.55

DILUTED:
--------

Net income (loss) ....................................    $(24,958)  $52,340
                                                          ========   =======


Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding...     57,257    62,188
Assumed exercise of outstanding stock options (1) .....         --       941
Assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock (1)..         --    33,844
                                                          --------  --------
Diluted common shares .................................     57,257    96,973
                                                          ========   =======

Net income (loss) per share ...........................   $  (0.61)  $  0.54



(1)  The earnings per share calculation for the three month period ended March
     31, 2003 excludes the assumed conversion of the convertible preferred stock
     and the outstanding stock options, as they are anti-dilutive. For the three
     month period ended March 31, 2002, the Series C convertible preferred stock
     is assumed to have been converted into 33.8 million shares at the beginning
     of the period.
#### Rozar *v.*McAllister.

Fish, C. J.

“On the trial of all felonies the presiding judge shall have the testimony taken down, and, when directed by the judge, the court, reporter shall exactly and truly record, or take stenographic notes of, the testimony and proceedings in the case, except the argument of counsel. In the event of the jury returning a verdict of guilty, the testimony shall be entered upon the minutes of the court, or in a book to be kept for that purpose.” Penal Code, § 1007. It is only “In the event of the jury returning a-verdict of guilty” (that is, guilty of a felony) that a transcript of the stenographic notes of the evidence, is required to be entered on the minutes of the court, or in a book to be kept for that purpose.

*73April 11, 1912.

Petition for mandamus. Before Judge Martin. Pulaski superior court. January 6, 1912.

*Wooten & Griffin,*for plaintiff.

(a) Accordingly, where one on trial under an indictment for a felony was convicted of a misdemeanor (which amounted to a final acquittal of the felony, in the absence of a new trial granted at the defendant’s instance), the reporter, who took stenographic notes of the evidence and proceedings on the trial, was under no official duty to transcribe, upon the demand of the defendant, the notes, of the evidence in order that the transcript might be recorded in the clerk’s office, where 'the defendant made no offer to pay the reporter for such service.

(Z>) It follows that the judge of the superior court did not, under the circumstances as above stated, err in refusing to grant a mandamus compelling the reporter to transcribe his stenographic notes of the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices*concur, *except*

Atkinson, J.,

dissenting. The indictment being for a felony, and the jury having returned a verdict of “guilty” of some offense covered by,the indictment, it was the duty of the stenographer to transcribe his notes of the evidence. *Williams*v. *Cooley,*127 *Ga.*21.
### §315a. Protection, administration, regulation, and improvement of districts; rules and regulations; study of erosion and flood control; offenses

The Secretary of the Interior shall make provision for the protection, administration, regulation, and improvement of such grazing districts as may be created under the authority of section 315 of this title, and he shall make such rules and regulations and establish such service, enter into such cooperative agreements, and do any and all things necessary to accomplish the purposes of this subchapter and to insure the objects of such grazing districts, namely, to regulate their occupancy and use, to preserve the land and its resources from destruction or unnecessary injury, to provide for the orderly use, improvement, and development of the range; and the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to continue the study of erosion and flood control and to perform such work as may be necessary amply to protect and rehabilitate the areas subject to the provisions of this subchapter, through such funds as may be made available for that purpose, and any willful violation of the provisions of this subchapter or of such rules and regulations thereunder after actual notice thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $500.

(June 28, 1934, ch. 865, §2, 48 Stat. 1270.)
Index 

Admission

Post 

Discharge

Whole 

Episode

Index 

Admission

Post 

Discharge

Whole 

Episode

One-Touch 11,419 13,772 14,436 One-Touch 12,199 15,037 15,503

Plurality of 

Cost

 7,582 9,374 7,799

Plurality of 

Cost

 8,824 11,208 9,300

Count (3,837) (4,398) (6,637) Count (3,375) (3,829) (6,203)

Percent -34% -32% -46% Percent -28% -25% -40%

Notes:

The One-Touch attribution rule associates any TIN billed by an EP during the indicated time period.

Table 1C. Example: how Plurality of Cost Method over the Whole Episode Can Produce Fewer Eligible TINs than Pluarlity of Cost in Post-Discharge

TIN 1 TIN 2 TIN 3 Max TIN TIN 1 TIN 2 TIN 3 Max TIN TIN 1 TIN 2 TIN 3 Max TIN

1 75% 25% - 1 75% 25% - 1 75% 25% - 1

2 10% 90% - 2 10% 90% - 2 10% 90% - 2

3 75% 25% - 1 75% - 25% 1 75% 12.5% 12.5% 1

4 90% 10% - 1 90% 5% 5% 1 90% 8% 2% 1

5 75% 25% - 1 35% - 65% 3 65% 10% 25% 1

Eligible TINs 2 3 2

Note: For this scenario to hold, the costs incurred during index admission for episodes 3,4,5 must be larger than the cost incurred in the post-discharge period.

Table 1B. Number of MSPB Eligible TINs by Attribution Rule - TINs 

used by 10+ EPs and Attributed 10+ MSPB Episodes

Billing Time Period

Attribution 

Rule

Table 1A. Number of MSPB Eligible TINs by Attribution Rule - TINs 

used by 10+ EPs and Attributed 20+ MSPB Episodes

Attribution 

Rule

Change

Billing Time Period

The Post Discharge period includes the time between and 

including the discharge date through 30 days after discharge 

Change

Percent of Index Admission Costs Percent of Post-Discharge Costs Percent of Total Episode Cost Episode

The MSPB episode includes the time period 3 days before admission 

thorugh 30 days after discharge of the index hospitalization.

The Plurality of Cost attribution rule associates the one TIN 

with the plurality of Part B costs incurred by EPs during the
### §8701. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §100, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 616, which related to Congressional findings, declarations, and purposes, was omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

6/15/10

Case 3:09-cv-00009-SC Document 12 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TALEO CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION

 /

No. 09-00151 JSW

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

On February 17, 2010, this Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and granted

Plaintiff until March 12, 2010 to file a second amended complaint. On March 15, 2010,

Defendants filed a notice of non-filing of second amended complaint and represented that they

had been advised by Plaintiff that it would not file a second amended complaint.

Accordingly, because Plaintiff has chosen not to file an amended complaint, for the

reasons set forth in the Court’s Order of February 17, 2010, this matter is HEREBY

DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00151-JSW Document 49 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VIRGINIA ROBERSON,

Defendant. /

No. CR 09-0523 WHA

ORDER RE SFPD MOTION

TO QUASH SUBPOENA

Defendant Virginia Roberson subpoenaed records from the San Francisco Police

Department to support a claim of vindictive prosecution and the SFPD moved to quash the

subpoena. The SFPD was ordered to search its files for any documents that could potentially

support a claim of vindictive prosecution and to submit them to for in camera review. Now the

SFPD’s legal counsel, Attorney Ronnie Wagner, has submitted a sworn declaration that after a

search she has determined that the only SFPD document relating to the federal decision to

charge defendant Roberson is a “chronological of investigation” by Inspector William Siebert. 

Based on an in camera review of this document, this order agrees that it contains no information

that support a claim of vindictive prosecution. This order trusts the SFPD to comply with its

obligations and disclose all relevant documents for in camera review. The SFPD’s motion to

quash is therefore DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 9, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cr-00523-WHA Document 83 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 1
### §§1131 to 1134. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 1131, acts Jan. 18, 1897, ch. 62, §1, 29 Stat. 490; June 23, 1897, ch. 8, 30 Stat. 105; Mar. 1, 1899, ch. 328, 30 Stat. 966, related to homestead settlers on lands in Greer County.

Section 1132, act Jan. 18, 1897, ch. 62, §2, 29 Stat. 490, related to laws applicable to entries of unoccupied lands.

Section 1133, act Jan. 18, 1897, ch. 62, §3, 29 Stat. 490, related to laws applicable to entries of town-sites.

Section 1134, act Jan. 18, 1897, ch. 62, §7, 29 Stat. 491, authorized applicability of sections 1131 to 1134 of this title to Greer County, Oklahoma, and repeal of inconsistent provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Kropman, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. All concur, except Cardamone and Hancock, Jr., JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and grant a new trial. Same memorandum and dissenting memorandum as in *People v Teeter*(62 AD2d 1158). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—conspiracy, first degree.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ. [86 Misc 2d 532.]
### §9903. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2003 to carry out the provisions of this chapter (other than sections 9922 and 9923 of this title).

#### (b) Reservations

Of the amounts appropriated under subsection (a) for each fiscal year, the Secretary shall reserve—

(1) 1⁄2 of 1 percent for carrying out section 9905 of this title (relating to payments for territories);

(2) 11⁄2 percent for activities authorized in sections 9913 through 9918 of this title, of which—

(A) not less than 1⁄2 of the amount reserved by the Secretary under this paragraph shall be distributed directly to eligible entities, organizations, or associations described in section 9913(c)(2) of this title for the purpose of carrying out activities described in section 9913(c) of this title; and

(B) 1⁄2 of the remainder of the amount reserved by the Secretary under this paragraph shall be used by the Secretary to carry out evaluation and to assist States in carrying out corrective action activities and monitoring (to correct programmatic deficiencies of eligible entities), as described in sections 9914(c) and 9913 of this title; and

(3) 9 percent for carrying out section 9921 of this title (relating to discretionary activities) and section 9917(b)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §674, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, §201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2730.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9903, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §674, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 512; Pub. L. 99–425, title IV, §405(c)(1), Sept. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 970; Pub. L. 101–501, title IV, §403, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1251; Pub. L. 103–171, §7(c)(2), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1994; Pub. L. 103–252, title II, §202(b), May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 651, related to State allocations for technical assistance and training, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 2, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 77406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26363]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 665

[RTID 0648-XA683]


Pacific Island Fisheries; 2020 U.S. Territorial Longline Bigeye 
Tuna Catch Limits for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; 
Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Announcement of a valid specified fishing agreement; 
correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS published a document in the Federal Register of November 
23, 2020, announcing a valid specified fishing agreement that allocates 
up to 1,000 metric tons (t) of the 2020 bigeye tuna limit for the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) to U.S. longline 
fishing vessels. The document incorrectly referred to American Samoa.

DATES: December 2, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Rassel, NMFS PIRO Sustainable 
Fisheries, 808-725-5184.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 23, 2020, in FR Doc. 2020-
25806, on page 74615, in the first column, correct the second sentence 
of the DATES caption to read: The start date for attributing 2020 
bigeye tuna catch to the CNMI was November 15, 2020.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 24, 2020.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-26363 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
§ 228.30 General. USAID may waive the rules contained in subparts A, B, and C of this part (except for prohibited sources as defined in § 228.01, and §§ 228.21 and 228.22), in order to accomplish project or program objectives. For any waivers authorized, the principal geographic code shall be Code 935, any area or country but excluding prohibited sources. All waivers must be in writing, and where applicable, are limited to the term established by the waiver. All waiver decisions will be made solely on the basis of the following criteria: ( a ) Waivers to permit procurement outside of Code 937 or 110 must be based on a case by case determination that: ( 1 ) The provision of assistance requires commodities or services of the type that are not produced in and available for purchase in Code 937 or 110;
( 2 ) It is important to permit procurement from a country not specified in Code 937 or 110 to meet unforeseen circumstances; or
( 3 ) To promote efficiency in the use of United States foreign assistance resources, including to avoid impairment of foreign assistance objectives.
( b ) Case by case waivers under paragraph (a) of this section may be made on the basis of a commodity or service type or category, rather than processing repeat, individual waivers for an identical or substantially similar commodity or service. Such waivers may be approved on a regional, country, or program basis. For purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, “produced in and available for purchase in” shall have the same meaning as the definition of “available for purchase” in § 228.01. A waiver under paragraph (a)(1) of this section may also be based on the fact that a commodity is not available for purchase in Code 937 or 110 in sufficient, reasonable, and available quantities or sufficient and reasonable quality that is fit for the intended purpose.
( c ) A waiver to authorize procurement from outside the United States of agricultural commodities, motor vehicles, and pharmaceuticals must meet the requirements of § 228.19.
( d ) Any individual transaction not exceeding $25,000 (excluding those covered by special procurement rules in § 228.19, and excluding procurements from prohibited sources) does not require a waiver and is hereby authorized.
[86 FR 24710, May 10, 2021]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2742 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2742

To amend the Small Business Act to increase the minimum Government-wide 
   goal for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

   Mr. Wynn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to increase the minimum Government-wide 
   goal for procurement contracts awarded to small business concerns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT-WIDE GOAL FOR PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS 
              AWARDED TO SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.

     Section 15(g)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) 
is amended by striking ``23 percent'' and inserting ``25 percent''.
                                 <all>
```
### §374. Sale of lands acquired in connection with irrigation project

Whenever in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior any lands which have been acquired under the provisions of the Act of June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and two (Thirty-second Statutes, page three hundred and eighty-eight), commonly called the "reclamation Act," or under the provisions of any Act amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, for any irrigation works contemplated by said reclamation Act are not needed for the purposes for which they were acquired, said Secretary of the Interior may cause said lands, together with the improvements thereon, to be appraised by three disinterested persons, to be appointed by him, and thereafter to sell the same for not less than the appraised value at public auction to the highest bidder, after giving public notice of the time and place of sale by posting upon the land and by publication for not less than thirty days in a newspaper of general circulation in the vicinity of the land.

Upon payment of the purchase price, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized by appropriate deed to convey all the right, title, and interest of the United States of, in, and to said lands to the purchaser at said sale, subject, however, to such reservations, limitations, or conditions as said Secretary may deem proper: Provided, That not over one hundred and sixty acres shall be sold to any one person.

The moneys derived from the sale of such lands shall be covered into the reclamation fund and be placed to the credit of the project for which such lands had been acquired.

(Feb. 2, 1911, ch. 32, §§1–3, 36 Stat. 895.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June seventeenth, nineteen hundred and two, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.