alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 248.311 Notice of intent. ( a ) *Eligibility for filing.* An owner of a project with a State assisted or subsidized mortgage intending to extend the low income affordability restrictions of the housing in accordance with § 248.153 or transfer the housing to a qualified purchaser under § 248.157 may file a notice of intent.
( b ) *Filing with the State agency.* The notice of intent shall be filed with the agency specified in § 248.307(b) or the agency which regulates or otherwise supervises the State assisted or subsidized mortgage. The notice of intent shall also request the tenants to notify the owner and the State agency of any individual or organization that has been designated or retained by the tenants to represent the tenants with respect to the actions to be taken under subpart B and subpart D of this part.
( c ) *Filing with HUD, mortgagee and tenants.* The owner simultaneously shall file the notice of intent with the local HUD field office having jurisdiction over the area in which the project is located and with the mortgagee, if any. In addition, the owner shall deliver a copy of the notice of intent to each tenant in the project and to any tenant representative, if any, known to the owner, and shall post a copy of the notice of intent in readily accessible locations within each affected building of the project. The copies of the notice of intent delivered to the tenants and the tenant representative shall include a summary of possible outcomes of the filing which shall be furnished by the State agency. Upon the request of any non-English speaking tenants residing in the affected project, the owner shall tabulate the number and type of translations needed by the tenants and request the State agency to provide the appropriate translations. The owner shall deliver a copy of the translated notice of intent to all of the tenants who requested such a translation. The failure of an owner to comply with any non-federal notice requirements shall not invalidate the notice of intent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CSBN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

NATALIE K. WIGHT (ORSBN 35576)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: 415.436.6937

Facsimile: 415.436.7234

Email: natalie.wight@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STANFORD H. ATWOOD, JR. (CSBN 37362)

ATWOOD & ASSOCIATES

750 University Avenue, Suite 130

Los Gatos, California 95032

Telephone: 408.395.5503

Facsimile: 408.395.5519

Email: stanford@atwoodlaw.net

JOHN J. JACKSON, III, PRO HAC VICE (DCBN 432019)

3240 S. I-10 Service Road W., Suite 200

Metairie, LA 70001

Telephone: 504.837.1233

Facsimile: 504.837.1145

Email: jjw-no@att.net

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ONE SPORT-HUNTED LEOPARD TROPHY,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-CV-2443-SI

JOINT STATUS REPORT

AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO

RESCHEDULE TELEPHONE

STATUS CONFERENCE

Case 3:09-cv-02443-SI Document 19 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 JOINT STATUS REPORT

C 09-2443-SI 2

The United States and counsel for the Claimant hereby submit this Joint Status Report to

the Court. The parties are in the process of settlement negotiations, and are currently evaluating

and discussing the settlement offers that have been exchanged. Therefore, in an effort to

effectuate an informal resolution to this case, the parties respectfully request that the telephone

status conference currently scheduled for Friday February 19, 2010, at 3:00 p.m., be continued

until March 5, 2010, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard by the Court.

STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED BY:

DATED: February 12, 2010 __________/S/______________________

NATALIE K. WIGHT

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: February 12, 2010 __________/S/______________________

JOHN J. JACKSON, III

Attorney for Claimant William Pritchard

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties and for good cause shown, the Telephone

Status Conference scheduled for Friday February 12, 2010, at 3:00 p.m., will be rescheduled

to ___________________________________________________.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:________________ __________________________________

HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

March 5, 2010, at 3:00 p.m.

Case 3:09-cv-02443-SI Document 19 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL NICHOLAS JENKINS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1 263

[ October 21, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Jeffrey Walton Hendriks , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 562020CT00 0 663A, 56 2020MM000805A , and 562020MM000741A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No app earance required for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, C.J., G ROSS and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
August 23
§ 3286.313 Expiration and renewal of trainer qualification. ( a ) *Expiration.* Each notice of qualification issued or renewed under this subpart D will expire 5 years after the date of its issuance or renewal.
( b ) *Renewal.* An application for the renewal of a trainer qualification must be submitted to HUD in accordance with § 3286.307, and must be submitted at least 60 days before the date the trainer's term of qualification expires. Any person applying for a qualification renewal after the date the qualification expires must apply for a new qualification, following the requirements established under this subpart D for application for initial qualification as an installation trainer.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00118-CR

CEDRIC WILLIS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. 33700-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Cedric Jerome Willis appealed his conviction for assault/family violence. See

TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(a) & (b-1) (West 2011). He has now filed a motion to 

dismiss his appeal which he and his attorney have signed.

Willis’s motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Willis v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 22, 2014

Do not publish

[CR25]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7942

SCOTT LEWIS RENDELMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK KEOHANE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-95-3110-JFM)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Scott Lewis Rendelman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Rendelman v. Keohane, No. CA-95-3110-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 8, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.1


      AGGREGATE TOTALS FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2004 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004



PRINCIPAL COLLECTIONS INFORMATION IN AUD (AND USD WHERE INDICATED) AGGREGATED
TO THE DATE OF THE LAST PAYMENT

Principal  amount  of each  class of USD  notes as at the  first  day  after the
payment date occurring during the collection period.
Class A2: USD 536,322,600.04
Class B1: USD 11,084,000.40

Aggregate coupon interest paid to noteholders of each class of notes
Class A2: USD 9,664,517.58
Class B1: USD 272,348.43

Aggregate of Principal payments made in respect to each class of notes:
Class A2: USD 149,827,217.39
Class B1: USD 3,096,429.16

Aggregate Mortgage Principal Repayments received for the period:
Scheduled       AUD 6,129,740
Unscheduled     AUD 363,671,013

Aggregate of all redraws on housing loans:
AUD 87,487,086

Aggregate of outstanding balance of housing loans at the end of the period:
AUD 934,680,919

Aggregate Income of the trust for the period:        AUD 80,150,681.05
Aggregate Expenses of the trust for the period:      AUD 68,934,698.08

Interest rates for the period:

Class A2 Notes (average):1.9102%
Class B1 Notes (average):2.4902%

Delinquency and loss statistics with respect to the housing loans:

Loss:                Nil
Delinquency:         0-29 days        2.17%
                     30 -59 days      0.82%
                     60+ days         0.78%



                                  Page 1 of 1
#### § 214.317 Reporting.

All participating agencies shall submit to HUD activity reports, which may be required up to quarterly. The reports must be submitted in the format, by the deadline, and in the manner prescribed by HUD. Participating agencies that are also recipients of HUD grants or subgrants may be required to submit additional reports, as described in their grant agreements and prescribed by HUD.
J

- A14004

- 17

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 TRACEY C. CARTER, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. TROY L. CARTER, Appellant No. 3817 EDA 2016

Appeal from the Order Entered November 23 , 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Domestic Relations at No(s):

009807300 PACSES No. 363004162

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., BOWES, J., and SHOGAN, J. DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 30, 2017
B ecause I would conclude that the trial court’s findings are not sufficiently supported by the evidence presented , I respectfully dissent

. For example, the court’s determination that the evidence supported a finding that Troy II could not work at any profitable employment is unreasonable in light of the fact that he was apparently successful in taking computer classes. Also, the fact that Troy II needs assistance in traveling and would

on ly consider an office job is not enough to support the court’s decision. Additionally, Mother’s testimony about Troy II ’s physical problems was not supported by any expert testimony or report. 1 Therefore, I would conclude

____________________________________________
1 Moreover, the documentary e vidence submitted at the master’s hearing, namely, the psychiatric reports, were not authenticated and should not have (Footnote Continued Next Page)J

- A14004

- 17

- 2

-

that the court abused its discre tion and erred as a matter of law by determining that Mother/Troy II carried their burden of rebutting the presumption of non

- support. Furthermore, I note that no evidence was presented by Mother/Troy II that was directed at proving the availability of

em ployment at a supporting wage. See Style v. Shaub , 955 A.2d 403, 409 (Pa. Super. 2008) (stating “the test is whether the child is physically and mentally able to engage in profitable employment and whether employment is available to that child at a suppor ting wage”). Accordingly, I must dissent.

(Footnote Continued)

_______________________ been allowed into the record. However, since no objection was raised at the time, we cannot rely on this error.
CERTIFICATION

     I, Janice A. Summers, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Roebling Financial Corp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over  financial  reporting  (as defined in Exchange Act Rule  13a-15(f))
that  occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent  fiscal  quarter  that has
materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the issuer's
auditors and the audit  committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,  process,  summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees  who have a  significant  role in the issuer's  internal  control over
financial reporting.


Date: December 28, 2006           /s/ Janice A. Summers
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Janice A. Summers
                                  Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
                                  and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of Hurray! Holding Co., Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Qindai Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has
not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: June 15, 2007    
|                       
|/s/ Qindai Wang        
|Qindai Wang            
|Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:09-cv-02138-SC Document 21 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 2
March 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:09-cv-02138-SC Document 21 Filed 03/18/10 Page 2 of 2
Wyant v. Astrue, Case No. 3:09-cv-01723-R: Amended Stipulation; [Proposed] Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, SBN CA 44332 

United States Attorney 

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153 

Social Security Administration Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

TIMOTHY R. BOLIN, SBN CA 259511 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

333 Market Street, Suite 1500 

San Francisco, California 94105-2102 

Telephone: (415) 977-8982 

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 

Email: timothy.bolin@ssa.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

RICHARD A. WYANT, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No. 3:09-cv-01723-RS 

AMENDED STIPULATION TO 

VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO 

SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 

AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, through their undersigned attorneys and with 

the approval of the Court, that Defendant agrees to a voluntary remand of this case per sentence 

four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative 

Law Judge to do the following: 

1. Conduct a new hearing, further develop the record and issue a new decision; 

2. Address the medical opinions, giving appropriate weight to the opinions of the treating 

physicians where warranted; 

*E-Filed 7/12/10*

Case 3:09-cv-01723-RS Document 24 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 2
Wyant v. Astrue, Case No. 3:09-cv-01723-R: Amended Stipulation; [Proposed] Order 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3. Provide a residual functional capacity finding consistent with all evidence of record; 

4. Reassess the claimant’s credibility; and 

5. Obtain new vocational expert testimony. Specifically, the Administrative Law Judge 

(ALJ) shall obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony. Such testimony should provide 

reasonable explanations for any conflicts between the testimony and the United States 

Department of Labor’s Dictionary of Occupational Titles. It should also cite jobs (if any) that an 

individual of Plaintiff’s age, education, work experience, and residual functional capacity 

could perform. 

Dated: July 9, 2010 By: SACKETT AND ASSOCIATES 

 /s/ Harvey P. Sackett*

 HARVEY P. SACKETT 

 *By email authorization

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Dated: July 9, 2010 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

 United States Attorney 

 LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS 

 Social Security Administration 

 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

 By: /s/ Timothy R. Bolin 

TIMOTHY R. BOLIN 

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

Attorneys for Defendant 

THE COURT APPROVES THE FOREGOING STIPULATION AND SO ORDERS. 

Dated: __________________________________ 

 HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

7/12/10

Case 3:09-cv-01723-RS Document 24 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 320.11 Insurance coverage.

The issuer shall maintain, for the benefit of the Association, insurance, errors and omissions, fidelity bond and other coverage as required by the Association and set forth in the appropriate MBS Guide.
#### § 26.47 Evidence.

The ALJ shall admit any relevant oral or documentary evidence that is not privileged. Unless otherwise provided for in this part, the Federal Rules of Evidence shall provide guidance to the ALJ's evidentiary ruling, but shall not be binding. Parties may object to clearly irrelevant material, but technical and hearsay objections to testimony as used in a court of law will not be sustained. The ALJ may, however, exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
### §7142c. Museum volunteers

#### (a) Authority to use volunteers

The Secretary may recruit, train, and accept the services of individuals or entities as volunteers for services or activities related to the Museum.

#### (b) Status of volunteers

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), service by a volunteer under subsection (a) shall not be considered Federal employment.

#### (2) Exceptions

#### (A) Federal Tort Claims Act

For purposes of chapter 171 of title 28, a volunteer under subsection (a) shall be treated as an employee of the Government (as defined in section 2671 of that title).

#### (B) Compensation for work injuries

For purposes of subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5, a volunteer described in subsection (a) shall be treated as an employee (as defined in section 8101 of title 5).

#### (c) Compensation

A volunteer under subsection (a) shall serve without pay, but may receive nominal awards and reimbursement for incidental expenses, including expenses for a uniform or transportation in furtherance of Museum activities.

(Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(4) [div. B, title IV, §403], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Miscellaneous Appropriations Act, 2001, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
Amendment No. 1 to Eclipsys Inducement Grant Omnibus Incentive Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.21

 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE ECLIPSYS CORPORATION 
 INDUCEMENT GRANT OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

 WHEREAS, Eclipsys Corporation (“Eclipsys”) has established the Eclipsys Corporation Inducement Grant Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, Eclipsys, Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
(“Allscripts”) and Arsenal Merger Corporation have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 9, 2010 (the “Merger Agreement”) under which Eclipsys will merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of
Allscripts (the “Transaction”); 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Eclipsys has the authority under
Section 11.1 of the Plan to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to provide that the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Allscripts will administer the Plan effective on and after the effective time of the Transaction (the “Transaction Date”). 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment set forth in the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows effective on and after
the Transaction Date: 
 1. By amending Section 2.3 to read as follows: 

“2.3. “Board” shall mean the Board of Directors of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc.”

 2. By amending the first sentence of Section 2.5 to read as follows: 

“2.5. “Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (or a subcommittee or subcommittee of the Board of Directors of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. appointed by that board from among its members).” 

3. By amending Section 12.1 to add the following new sentence to the end thereof: 

“To the extent an outstanding Award Document requires Company action for the amendment of such award, the Board or Committee shall
act on behalf of the Company.” 
 4. Except as hereinabove amended and modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and
effect.