alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2581 

To suspend temporarily the duty on the formulated product containing mixtures of the active ingredients 5-methyl-5-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-3- 

(phenylamino)-2,4-oxazolidi edione] (famoxadone) and 2-cyano-N- 

[(ethylamino)carbonyl]-2-(methoxyimino)acetamide (cymoxanil) and application adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on the formulated product 

containing mixtures of the active ingredients 5-methyl5-(4-phenoxyphenyl)-3-(phenylamino)-2,4-oxazolidi 

edione] (famoxadone) and 2-cyano-N- 

[(ethylamino)carbonyl]-2-(methoxyimino)acetamide 

(cymoxanil) and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF FAMOXADONE AND CYMOXANIL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
2 

•HR 2581 IH 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.07.49 Formulated product containing mixtures of the active ingredients 5-methyl-5- 

(4-phenoxyphenyl)-3- 

(phenylamino)-2,4- 

oxazolidinedione] 

(famoxadone) (CAS No. 

131807–57–3) and 2-cyanoN-[(ethylamino)carbonyl]-2- 

(methoxyimino)acetamide 

(cymoxanil) (CAS No. 

57966–95–7) and application adjuvants (provided for 

in subheading 3808.20.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Emergent   Group  Inc.  (the
"registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),  I,
William M. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


May 15, 2006


/s/ William M. McKay
-----------------------
William M. McKay
Chief Financial Officer
### §9164. Submarine electric transmission cable and equipment safety

#### (a) Standards and regulations

The Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with other interested Federal agencies and departments, shall establish and enforce such standards and regulations as may be necessary to assure the safe construction and operation of submarine electric transmission cables and equipment subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Such standards and regulations shall include, but not be limited to, requirements for the use of the safest and best available technology for submarine electric transmission cable shielding, and for the use of automatic switches to shut off electric current in the event of a break in such a cable.

#### (b) Report to Congress on appropriation and staffing needs

The Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with other interested Federal agencies and departments, is authorized and directed to report to the Congress within 60 days after August 3, 1980, on appropriations and staffing needed to monitor submarine electric transmission cables and equipment subject to the jurisdiction of the United States so as to assure that they meet all applicable standards for construction, operation, and maintenance.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title IV, §404, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 999.)
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 11
                                GUITAR CENTER, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                Quarter Ended
                                                  March 31,
                                           ----------------------
                                             1998          1997
                                           -------       --------
<S>                                        <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)                          $ 4,220       $ (6,821)

Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic                                       19,347         19,329
                                           -------       --------
                                           -------       --------

Diluted                                     20,773         20,419
                                           -------       --------
                                           -------       --------

Income (loss) per common share
Basic                                      $  0.22       $  (0.35)
                                           -------       --------
Diluted                                    $  0.20       $  (0.33)
                                           -------       --------
</TABLE>
----

| 1.   | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dr. Tattoff, Inc.; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                    |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Mark Edwards   |   |
|   |   | Mark Edwards            |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |                    |   |
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of SouFun Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Jiangong Dai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 3, 2013



/s/ Richard Jiangong DaiName:

Richard Jiangong DaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer
### §481. Action to recover construction charges and penalties

If the Secretary of the Interior shall so elect, he may cause suit or action to be brought for the recovery of the amount of the construction charges in default and penalties; but if suit or action be brought, the right to declare a cancellation and forfeiture of the entry or water-right application as provided in section 480 of this title shall be suspended pending such suit or action.

(Aug. 13, 1914, ch. 247, §3, 38 Stat. 687.)
#### § 241.265 Insurance of property against flood.

The mortgaged property shall be insured against flood as stipulated by the Federal Housing Commissioner. The mortgagee shall obtain such coverage in the event the mortgagor fails to do so. If the mortgagee fails to pay any premiums necessary to keep the mortgaged premises so insured, the contract of mortgage insurance may be terminated at the election of the Commissioner.

[39 FR 26023, July 16, 1974]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                           RE-AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY

         FAMOUS DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC. ("GUARANTOR") hereby unconditionally and
irrevocably re-affirms and re-confirms its guarantee of the complete and timely
performance of each obligation of the tenant (and any successor or assignee of
the tenant) under that certain Lease dated September 16, 1997 (the "LEASE")
between Famous Dave's Ribs-U, Inc., a Minnesota corporation,
predecessor-in-interest of FUMUME II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(hereinafter referred to as "TENANT") and D&H Building Corporation, an Illinois
corporation, as Landlord and any extensions or renewals of or amendments to the
Lease. The Guaranty is an absolute, primary, and continuing guaranty of payment
and performance and is independent of Tenant's obligations under the Lease.
Guarantor is primarily liable with Tenant and any other guarantor of Tenant's
obligations under the Lease. Guarantor re-affirms and re-confirms its waiver of
any right to require Landlord to (a) join Tenant with Guarantor in any suit
arising under the Guaranty, (b) proceed against or exhaust any security given to
secure Tenant's obligations under the Lease, or (c) pursue or exhaust any other
remedy in Landlord's power. Landlord may, without notice or demand and without
affecting Guarantor's liability hereunder, from time to time, compromise, extend
or otherwise modify any or all of the terms of the Lease. Guarantor hereby
re-affirms and re-confirms its waiver of all demands for performance, notices of
performance, and notices of acceptance of the Guaranty. The liability of
Guarantor under the Guaranty will not be affected by (1) the release or
discharge of Tenant from, or impairment, limitation or modification of, Tenant's
obligations under the Lease in any bankruptcy, receivership, or other debtor
relief proceeding, whether state or federal and whether voluntary or
involuntary; (2) the rejection or disaffirmance of the Lease in any such
proceeding; or (3) the cessation from any cause whatsoever of the liability of
Tenant under the Lease. Guarantor re-affirms and re-confirms its agreement to
pay to Landlord all costs incurred by Landlord in enforcing the Guaranty
(including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses). The
obligations of Tenant under the Lease to execute and deliver estoppel
statements, as therein provided, shall be deemed to also require Guarantor to
provide the same relative to Guarantor following written requests by Landlord in
accordance with the terms of the Lease.

                                                 FAMOUS DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC.,
                                                 A MINNESOTA CORPORATION

                                                 By:   /s/ Martin J. O'Dowd
                                                       ----------------------
                                                 Its:  Pres/CEO
### Digital data to support development of a pesticide management plan for the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Sioux County, North Dakota, and Corson County, South Dakota

By: Bryan D. Schaap

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds102

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
- Metadata:                               - **Buried valleys within the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Sioux County, North Dakota, and Corson County, South Dakota**
  - **Approximate western limit of glaciation within the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Sioux County, North Dakota, and Corson County, South Dakota**
  - **Availability of shallow ground-water resources within the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Sioux County, North Dakota, and Corson County, South Dakota**
  - **Surficial geology within the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, Sioux County, North Dakota, and Corson County, South Dakota** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

As part of a program to support development of pesticide management plans for Indian Reservations, the U.S. Geological Survey has been working in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to make selected information available to the Tribes or in a format easier for the Tribes to use.

As a result of this program, four digital data sets related to the geology or hydrology of the Standing Rock Indian Reservation were produced as part of this report. The digital data sets are based on maps published in 1982 at the 1:250,000 scale in "Geohydrology of the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, North and South Dakota," U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas HA-644 by L.W. Howells. The digital data sets were created by 1) scanning the appropriate map to create an image file, 2) registering the image file to real-world coordinates, 3) creating a new image file rectified to real-world coordinates, and 4) digitizing of the features of interest using the rectified image as a guide. As digital data sets, the information can be used in a geographic information system in combination with other information to help develop a pesticide management plan.
### §8303. Territorial application

The provisions of this chapter shall only apply within the contiguous 48 States and the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title I, §104, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3298; Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(3), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 311.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–42 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The provisions of this chapter shall apply in all the States, Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States, except that—

"(1) the provisions of subchapters II and III of this chapter (other than section 8341 of this title) shall only apply to powerplants and installations situated within the contiguous 48 States, Alaska, and the District of Columbia; and

"(2) the provisions of section 8341 of this title shall only apply to powerplants situated within the contiguous 48 States and the District of Columbia."
NO. 12-07-00486-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SUE MORRIS AND

FLOYD LEE MORRIS, JR., § APPEAL FROM THE THIRD

APPELLANTS

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

GERALD MORRIS,

APPELLEE § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

Appellants perfected their appeal on December 21, 2007. After various extensions, the time for

filing the reporter’s record expired on August 10, 2008 due to Appellants’ failure to pay for the

record. Consequently, Appellants’ brief was due on or before September 10, 2008. When

Appellants failed to file their brief within the required time, this court notified them on

September 12, 2008 that the brief was past due and warned that if no motion for extension of time

to file the brief was received by September 22, 2008, the appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b). The notice further informed

Appellants that the motion for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation for their

failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellee had not suffered material injury thereby.

On September 23, 2008, the clerk ofthis courtreceived a letter from Appellant Sue Morris,

in which she requested an extension of time to file the brief and stated she had retained an attorney

to “handle this” for her son, Appellant Floyd Lee Morris, Jr. On the same date, the clerk returned

the letter to Mrs. Morris informing her that a motion for extension of time must comply with the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure relating to motions, and that she should file a proper motion
2

on or before October 3, 2008. She was further notified that if a party has retained counsel in a case,

all documents filed in that case must be presented by counsel. Finally, she was informed that if

counsel had been retained, she should have counsel advise the court of his or her representation.

To date, neither Appellants nor any attorney acting on behalf of either appellant has complied with

or otherwise responded to this court’s September 23, 2008 notice. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3.(b).

Opinion delivered October 8, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
§ 241.515 Inspection fee. The firm commitment may provide for the payment of an inspection fee in an amount not to exceed $5 per thousand dollars of the commitment. If an inspection fee is required, it shall be paid as follows: ( a ) If the case involves the insurance of advances, it shall be paid at the time of initial endorsement.
( b ) If the case involves insurance upon completion, it shall be paid prior to the date construction is begun.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 229 (Friday, November 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Behavior and Social Science of Aging Review Committee NIA-S.
    Date: February 4-5, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Carmen Moten, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 402-7703, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#debdb3b1aabbb09eb3bfb7b2f0b0b7b6f0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed8e8082998883ad808c8481c3838485c38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Initial Review 
Group; Biological Aging Review Committee NIA-B.
    Date: February 11-12, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Bita Nakhai, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National 
Institutes of Health, Gateway Bldg., 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-7701, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#335d52585b525a51735d5a521d5d5a5b1d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb858a80838a8289ab85828ac5858283c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 24, 2020.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-26369 Filed 11-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 203.606 Pre-foreclosure review. ( a ) Before initiating foreclosure, the mortgagee must ensure that all servicing requirements of this subpart have been met. The mortgagee may not commence foreclosure for a monetary default unless at least three full monthly installments due under the mortgage are unpaid after application of any partial payments that may have been accepted but not yet applied to the mortgage account. In addition, prior to initiating any action required by law to foreclose the mortgage, the mortgagee shall notify the mortgagor in a format prescribed by the Secretary that the mortgagor is in default and the mortgagee intends to foreclose unless the mortgagor cures the default.
( b ) If the mortgagee determines that any of the following conditions has been met, the mortgagee may initiate foreclosure without the delay in foreclosure required by paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) The mortgaged property has been abandoned, or has been vacant for more than 60 days.
( 2 ) The mortgagor, after being clearly advised of the options available for relief, has clearly stated in writing that he or she has no intention of fulfilling his or her obligation under the mortgage.
( 3 ) The mortgaged property is not the mortgagor's principal residence and it is occupied by tenants who are paying rent, but the rental income is not being applied to the mortgage debt.
( 4 ) The property is owned by a corporation or partnership.
[52 FR 6915, Mar. 5, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 35020, July 3, 1996]
### SUBCHAPTER XI–B—AGING INFRASTRUCTURE
#### Samuel Grossman, appellant, v. William Hale Thompson et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 27,828.

Bill praying to have certain leases canceled and for an accounting of profits of an exposition. Bill dismissed for want of equity. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Fred Rush, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed and cause remanded.

Opinion filed July 3, 1923.

Max M. Grossman and Schoenbrod & Rosengard, for appellant. *669Roy D. Keehn and Mergentheim, Altheimer & Mayer, for appellees; Morton A. Mergentheim and Edward G. Woods, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.