alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 180.525 Requests for production of documents or things for inspection or other purposes, including physical and mental examinations. ( a ) Any party may serve on any other party a request to: ( 1 ) Produce and/or permit the party, or a person acting on the party's behalf, to inspect and copy any designated documents, or to inspect and copy, test, or sample any tangible things that contain or may lead to relevant information and that are in the possession, custody, or control of the party upon whom the request is served.
( 2 ) Permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party upon whom the request is served for the purpose of inspection and measuring, photographing, testing, or other purposes stated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) Each request shall set forth with reasonable particularity the items or categories to be inspected and shall specify a reasonable time, place and manner for making the inspection and performing the related acts.
( c ) Within 15 days after service of the request, the party upon whom the request is served shall serve a written response on the party submitting the request. The response shall state, with regard to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless there are objections, in which case the reasons for the objection shall be stated.
( d ) Upon motion of any party, when the mental or physical condition (including the blood group) of a party or of a person in the custody or under the legal control of a party, is in controversy, the presiding ALJ may order the party to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitably licensed or certified examiner or to produce for examination the person in the party's custody or legal control. The order may be made only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the person to be examined and to all parties and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of the examination and the person or persons by whom it is to be made. A report of the examiner shall be made in accordance with Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
### §7505. Environmental Protection Agency grants

#### (a) Plan revision development costs

The Administrator shall make grants to any organization of local elected officials with transportation or air quality maintenance planning responsibilities recognized by the State under section 7504(a) of this title for payment of the reasonable costs of developing a plan revision under this part.

#### (b) Uses of grant funds

The amount granted to any organization under subsection (a) shall be 100 percent of any additional costs of developing a plan revision under this part for the first two fiscal years following receipt of the grant under this paragraph, and shall supplement any funds available under Federal law to such organization for transportation or air quality maintenance planning. Grants under this section shall not be used for construction.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §175, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §129(b), Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 749.)
### §9858k. Limitations on use of financial assistance for certain purposes

#### (a) Sectarian purposes and activities

No financial assistance provided under this subchapter, pursuant to the choice of a parent under section 9858c(c)(2)(A)(i)(I) of this title or through any other grant or contract under the State plan, shall be expended for any sectarian purpose or activity, including sectarian worship or instruction.

#### (b) Tuition

With regard to services provided to students enrolled in grades 1 through 12, no financial assistance provided under this subchapter shall be expended for—

(1) any services provided to such students during the regular school day;

(2) any services for which such students receive academic credit toward graduation; or

(3) any instructional services which supplant or duplicate the academic program of any public or private school.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §658M, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title V, §5082(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–244; amended Pub. L. 102–401, §3(a), Oct. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1959; Pub. L. 102–586, §8(c)(1), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5036.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–401 and Pub. L. 102–586 made identical technical corrections to directory language of Pub. L. 101–508, §5082(2), which added this section.
----

| 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |   |                                                                                               |
|------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   | /s/    Thomas A. Borner                     |
| Date:  September 26, 2012 |   | Thomas A. Borner                                                                                   |
|                                     |   |  President and Chief Executive Officer                                                        |
|                                     |   |                                                                                               |
|                                     |   | /s/    Robert J. Halloran, Jr.         |
| Date:  September 26, 2012 |   | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.                                                                            |
|                                     |   | Executive Vice-President and Treasurer                                                             |
V 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2984 

For the relief of Shpetim Daku. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Shpetim Daku. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHPETIM 

4 DAKU. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Shpetim Daku shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 
2 

•HR 2984 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Shpetim Daku en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered 

4 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en7 actment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Shpetim Daku, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 
3 

•HR 2984 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Shpetim Daku shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 99.3

                 INTERSTAR SECURITISATION MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


The undersigned  officer of Interstar  Securitisation  Management Pty Limited, a
company  organized  under  the  laws  of  Victoria,  Australia  ("ISM"),  hereby
certifies on behalf of ISM and on his own behalf for  purposes of the  Interstar
Millennium  Series 2003-1G Trust Class A2 and Class B1 Mortgage  Backed Floating
Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

1.   I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of ISM,

2.   I am duly  authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's  Certificate on
     behalf of ISM; and

3.   To the best of my  knowledge,  the Issuer  Trustee  has  complied  with all
     conditions and covenants under the Transaction Documents, for the Interstar
     Millennium  Series  2003-1G  issue of Notes for the period  between July 1,
     2003 and the end of the Trust's fiscal year on December 31, 2003.

Capitalized  terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings  assigned
to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced  issue of
Notes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of October 13, 2004.



/S/ SAM KYRIACOU
-----------------
Name:   Sam Kyriacou
Title:  Director, Interstar Securitisation
        Management Pty Limited
### §1064. Violations of chapter; punishment

Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter, whether as owner, part owner, or agent, or who shall aid, abet, counsel, advise, or assist in any violation hereof, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and fined in a sum not exceeding $1,000, or be imprisoned not exceeding one year, or both, for each offense.

(Feb. 25, 1885, ch. 149, §4, 23 Stat. 322; Mar. 10, 1908, ch. 75, 35 Stat. 40.)
#### In the Matter of Joel Jayson, Petitioner, against Robert A. Glasser et al., Constituting the Harness Racing Commission of the State of New York, Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXIV—O'NEILL UNIT, PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM, NEBRASKA
#### Patrick Consalvas, Appellant, v. Brooklyn Loan Corporation, Respondent.

Motion for a stay pending appeal granted on condition that appellant be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the October Term, beginning October 3, 1960, for which term the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on the typewritten briefs of appellant and respondent. The parties are directed to file five copies and to serve one copy of their respective briefs. The appellant’s brief must he served and filed on or before September 28, 1960.
### §6944. Criteria for sanitary landfills; sanitary landfills required for all disposal

#### (a) Criteria for sanitary landfills

Not later than one year after October 21, 1976, after consultation with the States, and after notice and public hearings, the Administrator shall promulgate regulations containing criteria for determining which facilities shall be classified as sanitary landfills and which shall be classified as open dumps within the meaning of this chapter. At a minimum, such criteria shall provide that a facility may be classified as a sanitary landfill and not an open dump only if there is no reasonable probability of adverse effects on health or the environment from disposal of solid waste at such facility. Such regulations may provide for the classification of the types of sanitary landfills.

#### (b) Disposal required to be in sanitary landfills, etc.

For purposes of complying with section 6943(2) 1 of this title each State plan shall prohibit the establishment of open dumps and contain a requirement that disposal of all solid waste within the State shall be in compliance with such section 6943(2) 1 of this title.

#### (c) Effective date

The prohibition contained in subsection (b) shall take effect on the date six months after the date of promulgation of regulations under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §4004, as added Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2815; amended Pub. L. 98–616, title III, §302(b), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3268.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 6943(2) of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), was redesignated section 6943(a)(2) of this title by Pub. L. 96–463, §5(b), Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2056, and Pub. L. 96–482, §32(d)(2), Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2353.

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 98–616 struck out "or on the date of approval of the State plan, whichever is later" at end.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Administrator or other official of Environmental Protection Agency under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 6903 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael S. Wasik, certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.





Date:
8/11/09





By:    /s/ Michael S.
Wasik


Michael S. Wasik


Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                         
                                    EXHIBIT 11
                               GUITAR CENTER, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Quarter Ended         Six Months Ended
                                            June 30,                June 30,
                                       -----------------       ----------------
                                        1998        1997       1998       1997
                                       ------     -------    -------     ------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income (loss)                     $ 4,856     $  (531)    $ 9,076   $   395

Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic                                  19,550      19,329      19,449    19,329
                                      --------    --------    -------   -------
                                      --------    --------    -------   -------
Diluted                                21,138      19,329      20,952    20,456
                                      --------    --------    -------   -------
                                      --------    --------    -------   -------
Income (loss) per common share
Basic                                 $  0.25     $ (0.03)    $  0.47   $  0.02
                                      --------    --------    -------   -------
Diluted                               $  0.23     $ (0.03)    $  0.43   $  0.02
                                      --------    --------    -------   -------
</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORRAINE PLACIDO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTEL

NETWORKS LONG TERM DISABILITY

PLAN,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00668 WHA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION TO FILE

ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

AND MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

In this action to recover benefits under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act

of 1974, defendants requests a two-month extension of the deadline to file the administrative

record and their motion for summary judgment in this matter, which was set for April 19, 2010 in

a February 12 order. Defendants state that they need additional time to assess the evidence and

issues relating to their motion for summary judgment, locate relevant plan documents, review the

administrative record, and locate relevant witnesses. Plaintiff stipulates to defendants’ request.

Defendants’ request is GRANTED IN PART. The deadline to file the administrative record 

Case 3:09-cv-00668-WHA Document 47 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and motion for summary judgment is extended to MAY 10, 2010. This three-week extension

provides ample time for defendants to complete all tasks described in their request for extension..

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2010 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00668-WHA Document 47 Filed 04/14/10 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

Order 

March 14, 2012

144686 & (7)

144691 & (9)

144768 & (25)

FRANK HOUSTON, EDNA FREIER,

CHRISTY JENSON, LORETTA COLEMAN,

JIM NASH, DAVID RICHARDS, and

ERIC COLEMAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 144686

COA: 308725

Ingham CC: 12-000010-CZ

GOVERNOR,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF 

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

FRANK HOUSTON, EDNA FREIER,

CHRISTY JENSON, LORETTA COLEMAN,

JIM NASH, DAVID RICHARDS, and

ERIC COLEMAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 144691

COA: 308724

Ingham CC: 12-000010-CZ

GOVERNOR,

Defendant,

and

OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF 

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 14, 2012

0314

2

FRANK HOUSTON, EDNA FREIER,

CHRISTY JENSON, LORETTA COLEMAN,

JIM NASH, DAVID RICHARDS, and

ERIC COLEMAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 144768

COA: 308725

Ingham CC: 12-000010-CZ

GOVERNOR,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF 

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals (Docket No. 

144686) is DENIED as moot. The application for leave to appeal before consideration by 

the Court of Appeals (Docket No. 144691) is treated as an application for leave to appeal 

the March 7, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals. The applications for leave to 

appeal the March 7, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals (Docket Nos. 144691 and 

144768) are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on Wednesday, 

March 21, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. on whether to grant the applications or take other action. 

MCR 7.302(H)(1).
#### § 911.4 Effect of Board decision.

The action of the Board shall be final and binding and shall be implemented by the parties, unless an exception is filed with the Foreign Service Labor Relations Board within 30 days after receipt of the Grievance Board action.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Harvey Zinn, the Chief Executive Officer of SNB Bancshares, Inc., certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SNB Bancshares, Inc.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation;  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.     Dated:March 31, 2005 By: /s/ Harvey Zinn       Harvey Zinn   President and Chief Executive Officer