alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 221.305 Condition of the multifamily structure. ( a ) When a family unit is conveyed or a mortgage is assigned to the Commissioner, the family unit and the common areas and facilities (including restricted common areas and facilities) designated for the particular unit shall be undamaged by fire, earthquake, tornado, or boiler explosion, except if the property has been damaged, either of the following actions shall be taken: ( 1 ) The property may be repaired prior to its conveyance or prior to the assignment of the mortgage to the Commissioner.
( 2 ) With the prior approval of the Commissioner, the property may be conveyed or the mortgage assigned to the Commissioner without repairing the damage. In such instances, the Commissioner shall deduct from the insurance benefits either his estimate of the decrease in value of the family unit or the amount of any insurance recovery received by the mortgagee, whichever is the greater.
( b ) If the property has been damaged by fire and such property was not covered by fire insurance at the time of the damage, the mortgagee may convey the property or assign the mortgage to the Commissioner without deduction from the insurance benefits for any loss occasioned by such fire if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The property shall have been covered by fire insurance at the time the mortgage was insured.
( 2 ) The fire insurance shall have been later cancelled or renewal shall have been refused by the insuring company.
( 3 ) The mortgagee shall have notified the Commissioner within 30 days (or within such further time as the Commissioner may approve) of the cancellation of the fire insurance or of the refusal of the insuring company to renew the fire insurance. This notification shall have been accompanied by a certification of the mortgagee that diligent efforts were made, but it was unable to obtain fire insurance coverage at reasonably competitive rates and that it will continue its efforts to obtain adequate fire insurance coverage at competitive rates.
#### § 290.19 Restrictions concerning nondiscrimination against Section 8 voucher holders.

The purchaser of any multifamily housing project shall not refuse unreasonably to lease a dwelling unit offered for rent, offer to sell cooperative stock, or otherwise discriminate in the terms of tenancy or cooperative purchase and sale because any tenant or purchaser is the holder of a Voucher under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f), or any successor legislation. The purchaser's agreement to this condition must be contained in any contract of sale and also may be contained in any regulatory agreement, use agreement, or deed entered into in connection with the disposition.

[61 FR 11685, Mar. 21, 1996, as amended at 89 FR 38291, May 7, 2024]
### SUBCHAPTER II—RECLAMATION FUND GENERALLY
#### In the Matter of the Claim of George Durdaller, Respondent, v. Liberty Products Corp. et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant is suffering from a glandular disease which results in extreme obesity. His weight is at least 375 pounds, and a physician who examined him and who was unable to weigh him on his office scale, estimated the weight to be about 500 pounds. The extreme obesity itself was obvious and the employer knew when claimant was hired that the obesity was due to the disease since there had been a pre-employment physical examination. Claimant was put to work preparing airplane parts for painting, a job for which it was difficult to find workmen. This situation presents a classical illustration of the kind of physically handicapped employee whose employment was to be encouraged by subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and the fund set up by the statute. The proof is that the glandular *850condition was permanent. There can be no doubt.that its result in extreme obesity was likely to hinder employment and it was conceded by the Fund in the record that the injury sustained is greater than would normally result from the industrial accident. *(Matter of Ferguson*v. *Art Stone Co.,*6 A D 2d 25.) The decision of the board discharging the Special Fund because the claimant’s handicap was “not considered to be disabling” is without substantial evidence in its support. Decision discharging the Special Fund reversed and claim remitted to the board, with costs to appellant against the Special Fund. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.
steam_record - Fw: TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 - Request for extension to complete Questionnaire 

 

FYI 

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 09:09PM ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: Roger R Burger <rrburger@cmsenergy.com> 

Date: 07/02/2010 06:39PM 

Subject: Fw: TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 - Request for extension to complete Questionnaire 

Change of email address.

----- Forwarded by Roger R Burger/CONTRACT/CMS on 07/02/2010 05:38 PM -----

Good afternoon:

On behalf of the TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 we are requesting an extension to complete the Questionnaire for the 

Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines. Filer City received Version 2: Coal and Petroleum Coke - OMB 

Control Number: 2040-0281 on Friday, June 18, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. eastern daylight time.

Filer City has very limited staff and no designated person for water issues. We are currently involved in completing the 

Section 114 Testing required by the Air Division of EPA, undergoing an audit by the Reliability First Corporation for NERC 

(North American Electric Reliability Corporation), preparing for a performance review required by our power purchase 

agreement, preparing for a health and safety audit, and have a new plant manager. We will probably work with a consultant 

on this project which will require acclimation and orientation, plus a lengthy review of documentation.

We appreciate your review and consideration and review of this request and sincerely hope you can grant us additional time.

If you have any questions, please feel to contact me.

Thank you very much.

Roger R. Burger

Plant Manager

T.E.S. Filer City Station

(231) 723-6573 Ext. 102

(231) 723-4766 fax

(231) 690-0308 mobile

rrburger@cmsenergy.com 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <steamhelp@erg.com>

Date: 7/2/2010 8:10 PM

Subject: Fw: TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 - Request for extension to complete Questionnaire

From: Roger R Burger/CONTRACT/CMS

To: Alicea.jezeblele@epa.gov

Date: 07/02/2010 05:36 PM

Subject: TES Filer City Station - Plant ID 04170 - Request for extension to complete Questionnaire

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C33537DDO... 6/23/2011
§ 241.590 Eligibility of property. ( a ) A loan to be eligible for insurance shall be on real estate held: ( 1 ) In fee simple; or
( 2 ) On the interest of the lessee under a lease for not less than seventy-five years which is renewable; or
( 3 ) Under a lease having a period of not less than twenty-five years to run from the date the loan is executed.
( b ) The property constituting security for the loan transaction must be held by an eligible borrower as herein defined and must at the time the loan is insured be free and clear of all liens other than those specifically approved by the Commissioner.
#### § 3.440 Health and insurance benefits and services.

Subject to § 3.235(d), in providing a medical, hospital, accident, or life insurance benefit, service, policy, or plan to any of its students, a recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, or provide such benefit, service, policy, or plan in a manner that would violate §§ 3.500 through 3.550 if it were provided to employees of the recipient. This section shall not prohibit a recipient from providing any benefit or service that may be used by a different proportion of students of one sex than of the other, including family planning services. However, any recipient that provides full coverage health service shall provide gynecological care.
#### § 3284.5 Amount of fee.

Each manufacturer, as defined in § 3282.7 of this chapter, must pay a fee of $100 per transportable section of each manufactured housing unit that it manufactures under the requirements of part 3280 of this chapter.

[79 FR 47377, Aug. 13, 2014]
### §9618. High priority for drinking water supplies

For purposes of taking action under section 9604 or 9606 of this title and listing facilities on the National Priorities List, the President shall give a high priority to facilities where the release of hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants has resulted in the closing of drinking water wells or has contaminated a principal drinking water supply.

(Pub. L. 96–510, title I, §118, as added Pub. L. 99–499, title I, §118(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1655.)
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  Freddie M. Kotek                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                  M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                  Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | June                  1, 2007                                            |
§ 232.560 Interest rate. ( a ) The loan shall bear interest at the rate agreed upon by the lender and the borrower.
( b ) Interest shall be payable in monthly installments on the principal amount of the loan outstanding on the due date of each installment.
[39 FR 28966, Aug. 12, 1974, as amended at 53 FR 3366, Feb. 5, 1988; 53 FR 8885, Mar. 18, 1988]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Patricia TALAVERA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-50861.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*579Submitted March 6, 2007 *.

Filed March 19, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Robert J. Keenan, Esq., USSA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Libby, Esq., FPDCA-Fed-eral Public Defender’s Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Because Talavera has a history of depression, a family history of alcoholism, and a husband who “drinks excessively,” the district court did not plainly err in imposing an alcohol ban as a condition of supervised release. *See United States v. Sales,*476 F.3d 732, 735-36 (9th Cir.2007); *United States v. Maciel-Vasquez,*458 F.3d 994, 996 (9th Cir.2006), *petition for cert. filed,*— U.S.L.W. — (U.S. Dec. 13, 2006) (No. 06-8427).

We interpret the requirement that Ta-lavera “take all medications as prescribed by a psychiatrist or physician” to exclude the kinds of antipsychotic drugs found to trigger a significant liberty interest in *United States v. Williams,*356 F.3d 1045, 1053-55 (9th Cir.2004). Subject to this interpretation, the district court did not plainly err in imposing this condition as part of a greater treatment program based on Talavera’s history and characteristics. *See United States v. Fellows,*157 F.3d 1197, 1203-04 (9th Cir.1998).

Remand is necessary, however, to allow the district court to amend the written Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order to add the alcohol ban and the suspension of the otherwise mandatory drug testing, as orally pronounced during sentencing. *See United States v. Hicks,*997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.1993) (remanding to allow the district court to “make the written judgment consistent with the oral pronouncement”).

AFFIRMED IN PART and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ David D. WesselinkDavid D. WesselinkChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 7, 2004
#### O’BRIEN, Respondent, v. D. S. MORGAN & CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

Action by Blichael J. O’Brien against D. S. Morgan & Co. No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
ex10_54.htm









Exhibit 10.54


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT







The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the "Employer") and Patricia A. Stricker (the "Employee") wish to amend the Employee's Employment and Non-Competition Agreement dated April 1, 2007 (the "Agreement") to (i) bring the Agreement into compliance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and other authoritative guidance issued under that section, pursuant to IRS Notice 2010-6, and (ii) provide additional severance benefits.







Accordingly, the Agreement is amended as follows:







1.  Effective September 1, 2010, a new item (E) is added to Section 6(e)(i) to read as follows:







"and (E) payment of reasonable expenses related to career transition services (outplacement) with a mutually agreed upon provider, in accordance with the Employer's outplacement schedule of benefits."







2.  Effective September 1, 2010, paragraph (ii) of Section 6(e) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:







"(ii) The Employer shall not reduce the amount payable under the provisions of Section 6(e)(i)  if the Employee accepts other employment during the Severance Period."







3.  Effective April 1, 2007, Section 10(g) – Arbitration of Disputes – is amended by deleting the sentence that was added to the end of that Section by Amendment No. 1 and by replacing it in its entirety with the following new language:







"The Employee's right to reimbursement of expenses by the Employer under this Section is available to the Employee during the Employee's lifetime.  The amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement during one calendar year shall not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement in any other calendar year. Any reimbursement of an eligible expense shall be made to the Employee by the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense was incurred."







4.  Effective April 1, 2007, Section 10(i) – Governing Law – is amended by adding the following new sentence to the end of that Section:







"To the extent Code section 409A applies, the terms of this Agreement shall be interpreted as necessary to comply with the requirements of Code section 409A."







In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective as specified herein.








	
ATTEST/WITNESS:

	 	
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.


	  	  	 	  	  
	  	  	 	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	 	/s/ John A Saxton
	  	  	 	  	  
	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	 	
Print Name:

	
John A. Saxton


	  	  	 	  	  
	 	 	 	

Date:

	

August 31, 2010


	  	  	 	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	/s/ Patricia A. Stricker
	  	  	 	
Patricia A. Stricker


	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	 	  	  
	 	 	 	

Date:

	

September 13, 2010
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2898

To authorize the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue a consumer 

product safety rule to prevent injuries to users of vending machines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL

To authorize the Consumer Product Safety Commission to 

issue a consumer product safety rule to prevent injuries 

to users of vending machines.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vending Machine Safe5 ty Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) In May 2005, a 3 year old boy in Elkhart, 

9 Indiana, had to be rescued by firefighters after he 

10 was trapped in a crane vending machine. The boy 
2

•HR 2898 IH 

1 was rescued after firefighters removed the back of 

2 the machine. 

3 (2) In June 2000, a 4 year old boy in O’Fallon, 

4 Missouri, had to be rescued after getting trapped in5 side a crane vending machine. The child crawled into 

6 the machine through the trap door through which 

7 toys are dispensed. The child was freed from the 

8 machine only after rescue workers pried the top of 

9 the machine off. 

10 (3) In June 2000, another case of a child being 

11 trapped inside the same trap door of a crane vend12 ing machine occurred in Texas. 

13 (4) Since 1990, the Consumer Product Safety 

14 Commission has received at least 43 reported inci15 dents of individuals’ use of vending machines which 

16 has resulted in personal injury primarily to the indi17 viduals’ arms and hands. 

18 (5) At least 25 of the reported injuries were 

19 suffered by minors, 15 of which were by children 

20 under the age of 10. 

21 (6) It is clear that there are defects in the de22 sign of the vending machines which have led to the 

23 reported injuries. 
3

•HR 2898 IH 

1 SEC. 3. VENDING MACHINE RULE. 

2 Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 

3 of this Act, the Consumer Product Safety Commission 

4 shall issue a consumer product safety standard under sec5 tion 7 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 

6 2056), for the manufacture and installation of vending 

7 machines, particularly those using a lever or crane appa8 ratus to dispense a product. Such standard may include 

9 a requirement for warning labels or signs relating to the 

10 use of such machines to prevent injuries to individuals, 

11 including children.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>

                                                      Exhibit 27
                         TIME WARNER INC.
                     FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


     This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the financial statements of Time Warner Inc.
for the three months ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           511
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                     916
<INVENTORY>                                      859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,628
<PP&E>                                         3,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                35,069
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,981
<BONDS>                                       12,972
<COMMON>                                           6
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          1,717
<PREFERRED>                                        4
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  35,069
<SALES>                                        3,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,034
<CGS>                                          1,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  199
<INCOME-TAX>                                     147
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               52
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (17)
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      35
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)
        


</TABLE>
### §5816a. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4304(b)(7), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 664

Section, Pub. L. 95–39, title III, §308, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 189; Pub. L. 96–470, title II, §203(d), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2243, related to financial statements of Department of Energy officers and employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date and applicability of repeal, see section 4401 of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 2220 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
### §3789i. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3789i was editorially reclassified as section 10232 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §2101. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(a) States have the responsibility for management of a broad range of living and nonliving resources in State waters and submerged lands; and

(b) included in the range of resources are certain abandoned shipwrecks, which have been deserted and to which the owner has relinquished ownership rights with no retention.

(Pub. L. 100–298, §2, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 432.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 100–298, §1, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 432, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987'."
#### § 242.69 Transfer fee.

Upon application for review of a transfer of physical assets or the substitution of mortgagors, a transfer fee of 50 cents per thousand dollars of the outstanding principal balance of the mortgage shall be paid to HUD. A transfer fee is not required if both parties to the transfer transaction are not-for-profit or public organizations.