alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–499 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE 

BILL (H.R. 3996) TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO 

EXTEND CERTAIN EXPIRING PROVISIONS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 894] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 894, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill, H.R. 3996, the ‘‘Temporary Tax Relief Act of 

2007.’’ The resolution provides that it is in order for the chairman 

of the Committee on Ways and Means to make a motion that the 

House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 3996. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the motion. The resolution provides that the Senate amendment 

and the motion shall be considered as read. It further provides that 

the motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The resolution provides that, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may 

postpone further consideration of the motion to a time designated 

by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the motion includes a 

waiver of clause 10 of rule XXI (prohibiting consideration of a 

measure if the provisions of such measure affecting direct spending 

and revenues have the net effect of increasing the deficit or reducing the surplus for a specified period of time). 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with HEARING
COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 419 

Date: December 19, 2007. 

Measure: Senate amendment to H.R. 3996. 

Motion by: Mr. Hastings (WA). 

Summary of motion: To make in order and provide appropriate 

waivers for an amendment by Rep. Hastings (WA), #1, which would 

extend the state and local sales tax deduction until January 1, 

2009. 

Results: Defeated 4–8. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Nay; Matsui—Nay; Cardoza—

Nay; Welch—Nay; Castor—Nay; Arcuri—Nay; Sutton—Nay; 

Dreier—Yea; Diaz-Balart—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; Sessions—

Yea; Slaughter—Nay. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with HEARING
WebFilings | EDGAR view


 


EXHIBIT 32.2
 
CERTIFICATION
 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Two Harbors Investment Corp. (the “Registrant”) hereby certifies that the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
					
	Date:
	November 9, 2010
	 
	/s/ Jeffrey Stolt
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Jeffrey Stolt
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	 




 
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Quarterly Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2698 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8- 

bis(phenylthio)-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 

1,8-bis(phenylthio)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 9,10-ANTHRACENEDIONE, 1,8-BIS 

4 (PHENYLTHIO)-. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.03 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8- 

bis(phenylthio)-. (solvent yellow 163) (CAS No. 13676– 

91–0) (provided for in subheading 3204–19.20) ........... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2698 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
YearID HPMSVTypeIDyearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT

2013 10 2013 26883412.75 0

2013 20 2013 6421775220 0

2013 30 2013 1951567744 0

2013 40 2013 34274185.64 0

2013 50 2013 302738455.9 0

2013 60 2013 416627754.3 0
### §1181f–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1181f–1 was editorially reclassified as section 2621 of this title.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-30226 

D.C. No. 4:02-cr-00052-DLC-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2019**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. 

Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., appeals from the revocation of supervised 

release and the 10-month sentence and 39-month term of supervised release 

imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

Fourstar’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-30226 

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Fourstar has filed a pro se 

supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in this direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Fourstar’s pro se motion to 

substitute counsel is DENIED. Fourstar’s pro se motion to consolidate, to award 

costs and fees, and to certify constitutional challenges, is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 1003.609 Housing counseling.

Housing counseling, as defined in 24 CFR 5.100, that is funded with or provided in connection with ICDBG funds must be carried out in accordance with 24 CFR 5.111. Housing counseling conducted in connection with the ICDBG program may only be conducted by individuals who are HUD-certified in accordance with 24 CFR part 214, subpart F.

[89 FR 49808, June 12, 2024]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO NUNEZ-MIROLA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72498

Agency No. A078-025-259

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 24, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Alejandro Nunez-Mirola, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

MAR 02 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and

review de novo constitutional claims and questions of law. Mohammed v.

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny in part and dismiss in

part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Nunez-Mirola’s motion to

reopen, where he failed to establish he did not receive notice of the time and place

of the hearing at which he was ordered removed in absentia, or that his attorney’s

illness and failure to inform him of his hearing date constitutes exceptional

circumstances sufficient to excuse his failure to appear. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229a (b)(5)(C)(i); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). Nunez-Mirola’s contention that

he received notice in English does not change this conclusion. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1229(a)(2)(A) (“in the case of any change or postponement in the time and place

of [] proceedings, . . . a written notice shall be given in person to the alien”); Khan

v. Ashcroft, 374 F.3d 825, 829 (9th Cir. 2004) (notice in English is “reasonably

calculated to reach and to inform [petitioner]”).

To the extent Nunez-Mirola now contends his prior attorney abandoned him,

or failed to withdraw from or seek a continuance in his case, we lack jurisdiction

over these unexhausted contentions. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080

2 13-72498
(9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an

alien’s administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).

Nunez-Mirola’s contention that the IJ violated due process by failing to

provide his prior attorney with written notice of the hearing is likewise

unexhausted. See id.

We deny Nunez-Mirola’s request for judicial notice of the extra-record

information regarding his prior counsel. See Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365, 371

(9th Cir. 2010) (stating standard for review of out-of-record evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 

3 13-72498
### §8262k. Government contract incentives

#### (a) Establishment of criteria

Each agency, in consultation with the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council, shall establish criteria for the improvement of energy efficiency in Federal facilities operated by Federal Government contractors or subcontractors.

#### (b) Purpose of criteria

The criteria established under subsection (a) shall be used to encourage Federal contractors, and their subcontractors, which manage and operate federally-owned facilities, to adopt and utilize energy conservation measures designed to reduce energy costs in Government-owned and contractor-operated facilities and which are ultimately borne by the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §167, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2862.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act which comprises this chapter.
### §2881. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title III, §331, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 525; Pub. L. 89–16, title III, §303, Apr. 30, 1965, 79 Stat. 108; Pub. L. 89–253, §24, Oct. 29, 1965, 79 Stat. 977; Pub. L. 89–794, title III, §301(c), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1465, related to indemnity payments to farmers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.
#### § 248.305 Applicability of subpart B of this part.

The provisions of subpart B of this part shall be applicable to any application of a State agency or local housing authority for assistance under subpart D of this part, except the following provisions:

Sec.

248.103 General prepayment limitation.

248.105 Notice of intent.

248.131 Information from the Commissioner: Only paragraph (a).

248.141 Criteria for approval of a plan of action involving prepayment and voluntary termination.

248.153 Incentives to extend low income use: Only paragraphs (a)(7), (d) and (e).

248.165 Assistance for displaced tenants.

248.169 Permissible prepayment or voluntary termination and modification of commitments.

248.173 Resident homeownership program: Only paragraph (s).

248.177 Delegated responsibility to State agencies.
### §300a–6a. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–362, title VI, §601(a)(1)(G), Nov. 10, 1998, 112 Stat. 3285

Section, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title X, §1009, as added Pub. L. 94–63, title II, §203(a), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 307; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1062(c), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 720, related to plans and reports concerning family planning services.
#### § 266.622 Notice and date of termination by the Commissioner.

The Commissioner shall notify the HFA that the contract of insurance has been terminated and shall establish the effective date of termination. The termination shall be the last day of the month in which one of the events specified in § 266.620 occurs.

[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83440, Dec. 22, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             751
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,708
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      7,700
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,384
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,397
<LOANS>                                         46,607
<ALLOWANCE>                                        792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,370
<DEPOSITS>                                      56,810
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,781
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                211
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  68,370
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,010
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  143
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   109
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,262
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 580
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 580
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              682
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    287
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         287
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.05
<LOANS-NON>                                         59
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    86
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   790
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  792
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               100
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            692
        

</TABLE>
#### § 232.3 Eligible borrower.

The borrower shall be a single asset entity acceptable to the Commissioner, as may be limited by the applicable section of the Act, and shall possess the powers necessary and incidental to owning the project, except that the Commissioner may approve a non-single asset borrower entity under such circumstances, terms, and conditions determined and specified as acceptable to the Commissioner.

[77 FR 55136, Sept. 7, 2012]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2979 

To amend the Crow Boundary Settlement Act of 1994 regarding the 

distribution of capital gains from the Crow Tribal Trust Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Crow Boundary Settlement Act of 1994 regarding the distribution of capital gains from the Crow 

Tribal Trust Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CROW TRIBAL TRUST FUND. 

4 Section 6(d) of the Crow Boundary Settlement Act 

5 of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 1776d(d)), is amended— 

6 (1) in the subsection heading, by inserting ‘‘and 

7 Capital Gains’’ after ‘‘Interest’’; 

8 (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Only’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘Except as provided in paragraph (4), 

10 only’’; and 
2 

•HR 2979 IH 

1 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(4) DISTRIBUTION OF CAPITAL GAINS.—Not3 withstanding subsection (f), capital gains and any 

4 other noninterest income received on funds in the 

5 Crow Tribal Trust Fund shall be available for dis6 tribution by the Secretary to the Crow Tribe to the 

7 extent that the balance in the Crow Tribal Trust 

8 Fund (including capital gains) exceeds 85,000,000, 

9 for the same uses and subject to the same restric10 tions in paragraphs (1) and (3) as are applicable to 

11 distributions of interest.’’. 

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2978 

To allow the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation to enter into a lease or other temporary conveyance of water rights 

recognized under the Fort Peck-Montana Compact for the purpose of 

meeting the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, 

Incorporated, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To allow the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck 

Indian Reservation to enter into a lease or other temporary conveyance of water rights recognized under the 

Fort Peck-Montana Compact for the purpose of meeting 

the water needs of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Incorporated, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2978 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MONTANA INDIAN TRIBES; AGREEMENT WITH 

2 DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION, 

3 INCORPORATED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes 

5 of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation (referred to in this 

6 section as the ‘‘Tribes’’) may, with the approval of the 

7 Secretary of the Interior, enter into a lease or other tem8 porary conveyance of water rights recognized under the 

9 Fort Peck-Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 

10 85–20–201) for the purpose of meeting the water needs 

11 of the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association, Incorporated 

12 (or any successor entity), in accordance with section 5 of 

13 the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 

14 2000 (Public Law 106–382; 114 Stat. 1454). 

15 (b) CONDITIONS OF LEASE.—With respect to a lease 

16 or other temporary conveyance described in subsection 

17 (a)— 

18 (1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall 

19 not exceed 100 years; 

20 (2) the lease or conveyance may be approved by 

21 the Secretary of the Interior without monetary com22 pensation to the Tribes; and 

23 (3) the Secretary of the Interior shall not be 

24 subject to liability for any claim or cause of action 

25 relating to the compensation or consideration re26 ceived by the Tribes under the lease or conveyance. 
3 

•HR 2978 IH 

1 (c) NO PERMANENT ALIENATION OF WATER.—Noth2 ing in this section authorizes any permanent alienation of 

3 any water by the Tribes. 

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER XXVIII—DALLAS PROJECT, OREGON
U.S. Depc.-tment of Transportation
OffiCe of the secretory 

### at Transportation 

# Memorandum

Subject: Notice of Communication: (Docket: DOT-OST-20 14-0056) Date: June 3, 2015



# ,.& **~/}11/ ~**  From: Blane Workie, Assistant General Counsel

To : Chief, Dockets

In the notice of proposed rulemaking titled "Transparency of Airline Ancillary Fees and Other Consumer Protection Issues," (Consumer III NPRM)

, the Department stated that it

" is considering whether carriers should be prohibited from restricting the information provided by ticket agents when those ticket agents do not sell air transportation directly to consumers but rather provide consumers with different airlines' flight information for comparison shopping." 79 FR 29970, 29974 (May 23, 2014). On t-.1ay 18, 2015, Department staff met with representatives of online travel agencies (OTAs) and metasearch travel sites and their outside counsel who urged the Department to consider taking enforcement action against airlines that restrict di st ribution of airline fare and schedule information to metasearch sites fOi engaging in unfair methods of competition. Although the May 18"' discussion concerned enforcement, we are posting thi s memorandum in the rulernaking docket in the interest of 

### full disclosure.

The meeting participants were:

Kathryn Thomson, Blane Workie, Jonathan Dols Kimberly Graber Jill Laptosky Claire McKenna Cindy Baraban Robert Goldner

Todd Homan
Carolyn Jameson Jason Park Craig Romaine Fiona Scott Morton DOT General Counsel DOT, Office of General Counsel DOT, Office of General Counsel DOT, Office of General Counsel DOT, Office of General Counsel DOT, Office of General Counsel DOT, Office of General Counsel Office of the Assistant Secretary Aviation and International Affairs Office of the Assistant Secretary Aviation and International Affairs Skyscanner Expedia Charles River Associates Yale UniversityStephen Shur Bryan Saltzburg David Morris Jennifer Trock Ken Quinn Travel Technology Association Trip Advisor Trip Advisor Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

A copy of a report titled "Benefits of Preserving Consumers' Ability to Compare Airline Fares" was also provided to the Department a day after this meeting. This report is also being placed in the docket.
§ 232.545 Covenant against liens. ( a ) The security instrument shall contain a covenant against the creation by the borrower of additional liens against the property superior or inferior to the lien of such instrument, except with the prior approval of the Commissioner.
( b ) The covenant required under paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply where a lien inferior to the lien of the insured mortgage is given in favor of a Federal, State or local governmental agency or instrumentality under such circumstances as may be approved by the Commissioner, provided the source of funds for repayment of the inferior lien is limited to surplus cash or residual receipts.
[36 FR 24641, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 48 FR 35393, Aug. 4, 1983; 49 FR 12215, Mar. 29, 1984]