alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1473a. Acceptance of contributions by Secretary; cooperation with prosecution of projects

The Secretary is authorized to accept lands, buildings, equipment, other contributions and, before, on, and after November 13, 1991, fees to be deposited in the contributed funds account from public and private sources, and to prosecute projects using such contributions and fees in cooperation with other Federal, State or private agencies.

(Pub. L. 102–154, title I, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1002.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Text of section is based on language in appropriations act related to the Bureau of Mines.

In text, "before, on, and after November 13, 1991," substituted for "heretofore and hereafter".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title I], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–168; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.

Pub. L. 103–332, title I, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2509.

Pub. L. 103–138, title I, Nov. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 1389.

Pub. L. 102–381, title I, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1386.

Pub. L. 101–512, title I, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1927.
f8k110810ex10vi_chinaalumin.htm


 



Exhibit 10.6


 


Trademark License Agreement







This Trademark License Agreement (this "Agreement") is made as of March 18, 2008, by and between Zhengzhou Aluminum Co., Ltd. (“Zhengzhou Aluminum”) and Zhengzhou Shensheng Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. (“Shensheng Aluminum”).







According to the "PRC Trademark Law" and "Implementing Regulations of the PRC Trademark Law", by friendly consultation, Zhengzhou Aluminum and Shensheng Aluminum entered into this Agreement:


I. Zhengzhou Aluminum legally owned the trademark below, and now authorizes Shensheng Aluminum to use it:


The trademark name: words with picture (see Exhibit)


The trademark NO.: 4686455


Approved Production (VI): aluminum ingots, aluminum foil, metal sheets and metal plates, metal doors, metal windows, metal building materials, metal pipes, raw and semi-processed ordinary metals.


The term of validity: March 14, 2008 – March 13, 2018


II This licensing period is 9 years from the date of this Agreement. When this agreement expired, if Shensheng Aluminum needs to extend the licensing, the two parties will sign a new agreement.


III Zhengzhou Aluminum grants Shensheng Aluminum to use the licensed trademark worldwide.


IV Zhengzhou Aluminum grants Shensheng Aluminum to use the licensed trademark exclusively.


V Zhengzhou Aluminum is the sole shareholder of Shensheng Aluminum, so this licensing is free.


VI Shensheng Aluminum must ensure the quality of products using the trademark and take the responsibility.


VII Shensheng Aluminum must ensure the trademark used legally.


VIII Shensheng Aluminum can’t change any part of the trademark and identify the producer and the place of producing.


IX Shensheng Aluminum should take the packaging design of the product with the trademark to Zhengzhou Aluminum to check.


X During the valid period of this Agreement, Zhengzhou Aluminum has the right to supervise the quality of product using the trademark. If Shensheng Aluminum got punishment because of poor product quality, and the trademark was damaged seriously, Zhengzhou Aluminum has the right to acquire compensation from Shensheng Aluminum.


XI Zhengzhou Aluminum ensures the valid of the trademark during the period of this Agreement, and will cover the renewal fees.


 




  





  











  






 


XII If Zhengzhou Aluminum transfers the right of the trademark, Shensheng Aluminum has the priority to get it.


XIII Zhengzhou Aluminum grants Shensheng Aluminum to use the copy the trademark license (see exhibit).


XIV If this Agreement needs to be modified, the parties shall enter into a written agreement.


XV In case of dispute raised, both parties shall solve it through friendly consultation, otherwise each can sue to the court.


XVI Once the parties sign this Agreement, it’ll be effective. This agreement has two original pieces, each party holds one.




 


Zhengzhou Aluminum Co., Ltd.







/s/ Congfu Li


Authorized Signatory







Zhengzhou Shensheng Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd.







/s/ Chuanhong Xie


Authorized Signatory
### §6702. Direct grants; Federal share

(a) The Secretary is authorized to make grants to any State or local government for construction (including demolition and other site preparation activities), renovation, repair, or other improvement of local public works projects including but not limited to those public works projects of State and local governments for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under provisions of law other than this chapter. In addition the Secretary is authorized to make grants to any State or local government for the completion of plans, specifications, and estimates for local public works projects where either architectural design or preliminary engineering or related planning has already been undertaken and where additional architectural and engineering work or related planning is required to permit construction of the project under this chapter.

(b) The Federal share of any project for which a grant is made under this section shall be 100 per centum of the cost of the project.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title I, §103, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 999.)
Document

Exhibit 10.4

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated this 15th day of September 2022 (the "Effective Date"), is entered into by and between BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and Dr. William Sheridan (“Employee”).
RECITALS
    WHEREAS, the Company and Employee are parties to that Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
    WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the terms of the Employment Agreement, as set forth herein, effective as of the date hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


1.    Section 1(a).  Section 1(a) is hereby amended by replacing the reference to “Chief Medical Officer” with “Chief Development Officer”. 


2.    Continuation of Employment Agreement.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all of the terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and this Employment Amendment shall not amend or modify any other rights, powers, duties, or obligations of any party to the Employment Agreement.
3.    Complete Agreement. This Amendment and the Employment Agreement contain the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein and supersedes and replaces any prior agreement between the parties with respect to the matters set forth in this Amendment.
4.    Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and any such counterparts may be transmitted by electronic transmission, and each of such counterparts, whether an original or an electronic or ".pdf" of an original, shall be deemed to be an original and all of such counterparts together shall constitute a single agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, on the date first set forth above.










						
	EMPLOYEE
	BIOCRYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

	

	
	/s/ William Sheridan____________
	By:    /s/ Jon Stonehouse        

	William Sheridan, MB BS
	Jon Stonehouse

		Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 3.(i)(b)

                 CERTIFICATE OF INCREASE OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES
                   OF SERIES COMMON STOCK OF TIME WARNER INC.
                    DESIGNATED AS SERIES LMCN-V COMMON STOCK

                         (Pursuant to Section 151 of the
              General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)

     The Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended to date, of
Time Warner Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), authorizes
2.45 billion shares of capital stock, which consists of 2.0 billion
shares of Common Stock, 200 million shares of Series Common Stock and 250
million shares of Preferred Stock.

     The Corporation certifies that, pursuant to authority conferred on
the Board of Directors of the Corporation by its Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and in accordance with the provisions of Section 151 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors
of the Corporation, at a meeting thereof duly called and held on July 17,
1997, at which a quorum was present and acting throughout, duly adopted
the following resolution:

          RESOLVED that pursuant to the authority expressly
     granted and vested in the Board of Directors of the
     Corporation in accordance with the provisions of its Restated
     Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, the number of
     shares of Series Common Stock of the Corporation designated
     as Series LMCN-V Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, be
     increased from 60,000,000 to 65,000,000 and that the Chief
     Executive Officer, the President or any Vice President and
     the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the Corporation
     be and hereby are authorized and directed in the name and on
     behalf of the Corporation to  execute and file a Certificate
     of Increase with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
     and to take any and all other actions as they or any one of
     them deem necessary or appropriate to effectuate this resolution;

     Accordingly, by the filing of this Certificate of Increase, the
number of shares of Series Common Stock of the Corporation designated as
Series LMCN-V Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, is hereby increased
from 60,000,000 to 65,000,000.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its corporate seal
to be affixed hereto and this Certificate of Increase to be signed by its
Executive Vice President this 12th day of August, 1997.

                              TIME WARNER INC.

                              By ________________________
                                   Peter R. Haje
                                   Executive Vice President
### §547. Patent to desert-land entryman

Any desert-land entryman whose desert-land entry has been embraced within the exterior limits of any land withdrawal or irrigation project under the Act of June 17, 1902, known as the reclamation Act, and who may have obtained a water supply for the land embraced in any such desert-land entry from the reclamation project by the purchase of a water-right certificate, may at any time after having complied with the provisions of the law applicable to such lands and upon proof of the cultivation and reclamation of the land to the extent required by the reclamation Act for homestead entrymen, submit proof of such compliance, which proof, if found regular and satisfactory, shall entitle the entryman to a patent and a final water-right certificate under the same terms and conditions as required of homestead entrymen under the Act entitled "An Act providing for patents on reclamation entries, and for other purposes, approved August ninth, nineteen hundred and twelve [43 U.S.C. 541 et seq.]." 1

(Aug. 26, 1912, ch. 408, §1, 37 Stat. 610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, known as the reclamation Act, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

The Act entitled "An Act providing for patents on reclamation entries, and for other purposes", referred to in text, is act Aug. 9, 1912, ch. 278, 37 Stat. 265, which is classified generally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

This section was not enacted as part of act Aug. 9, 1912, ch. 278, 37 Stat. 265, which comprises this subchapter.

1 So in original. The closing quotation marks probably should follow "purposes".
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 3971 Lower Tribunal No. 2022

- CC

- 018145

_____________________________
P AMELA K ING , Appellant,

v.

P EOPLE ’ S T RUST I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Evellen Jewett , Judge.

September 13, 2024

PER CURIAM.

Pamela King appeals the trial court’s October 30, 2023, order dismissing her

complaint for failing to comply with section 627.70152(3), Florida Statutes. Based

on our recent decision in Hughes v. Univ ersal Prop erty & Cas ualty Ins urance Co

. , 374 So. 3d 900 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023) , which is indistinguishable in all material

respects from the instant case, we reverse the dismissal and remand this case for

further proceedings. For the same reasons set forth in Hughes , we certify this2 decision to be in direct conflict with Cole v. Universal Property & Casualty

Insurance Co.
, 363 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023)

.

REVERSED and REMANDED. CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

NARDELLA and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur. L AMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge , concurs in result only.

Jeremy D. Bailie, of Weber, Crabb & Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Mark D. Tinker and Brandon J. Tyler , of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,364
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,306
<PP&E>                                          16,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,143
<SALES>                                         84,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,266
<CGS>                                           57,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,916
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .65
        

</TABLE>
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

ELIZABETH KARNAZES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-0767 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY LETTERS (DKT ##60-

62)

The Court is in receipt of three discovery letters filed by Plaintiff on April 6, 2010. (Dkt.

##60-62.) Because Plaintiff’s letters do not comply with the undersigned’s discovery standing order

and the Court’s March 1, 2010 Order (Dkt. #47), the Court hereby STRIKES Plaintiff’s letters.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-00767-MMC Document 63 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 1
### Williams , Rene e (OST ) ^^l^- { bCTT ^ OLST-I^O^/VS^ J . From : Jervsjo , Sabrin a - Manle

yHo t Springs , A K [Sabrina.Jervsjo@usps.gov ] Sent : Thursday , Jun e 24 , 201 0 8:0 8 P M To : EA S (OST )
T o Who mi t mayConcern ;

M ynam e i s Sabreni a Dervsjo , I hav e live d i nManle yfo r ove r 3 7 years . I woul d lik e t o sho wsuppor t o f ou r mai l carrie r Warbelows . I wor k a s a mai l carrie rfo rthe mand I als o wor k i nth e Pos t Offic e s o I fee l I m yjob s her e i nManle ywoul d b e directl yaffecte d i f the ywer e t o sto p fundin g o r tr yt o cu t costs . I a maskin g t o tha t yo u retai nthi s subsidy . Than k yo u fo r you r time .

Sabreni a Dervsj o "OIC " Manle yHo t Spring s Pos t Offic e Bo x5 1 Manle yHo t Spring s A K 9975 6 907-672-332 1
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig A.
Zabala, as acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereto certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
March 30,
2010





/s/ Craig A.
Zabala





Craig
A. Zabala


Acting
Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Blackhawk Capital Group BDC and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREANDOUS COTTON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

A. HEDGPETH, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00385 WHA

ORDER ADVANCING

HEARING TO MAY 14

Pro bono counsel have filed a motion to withdraw, noticed for June 11. 

The June 11 hearing is hereby advanced to MAY 14 AT 2:00 P.M. Counsel for the parties shall

please arrange for plaintiff to appear telephonically at the hearing. Counsel should please

contact the Courtroom Deputy, Dawn Toland, (415) 522-2020, regarding any dial-in

information.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 8, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00385-WHA Document 126 Filed 05/08/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raymond Huggenberger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inogen, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inogen, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2014 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Raymond Huggenberger                       
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Raymond Huggenberger                           
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

I, Alison Bauerlein, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inogen, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inogen, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2014 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Alison Bauerlein              
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Alison Bauerlein                  
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer,          
|                     |  |  |  |        |  | Executive Vice President, Finance,
|                     |  |  |  |        |  | Secretary and Treasurer
#### In re Petition of Maggie Harrigan, etc., appellant, v. Ernest J. Galbraith, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,223.

Prayer for removal of administrator *cte bonis non*and for appointment of petitioner instead. Petition dismissed. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the Hon. John M. Niehaus, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed September 7, 1923.

Rehearing denied October 2, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Henry Mansfield and David J. Cowan, for appellant. I. L. Puller, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.