alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 241.1200 Cross-references. ( a ) *Projects with a HUD-insured or HUD-held mortgage.* ( 1 ) All the provisions of part 207, subpart B of this chapter, covering mortgages insured under section 207 of the Act, apply to equity loans or acquisition loans on a project insured under section 241(f) of the Act, except the following provisions: Sec. 207.251 Definitions. 207.252 First, second and third premium. 207.252a Premiums—operating loss loans. 207.252b Premiums—mortgages insured pursuant to section 223(f) of the Act. 207.252c Premiums—mortgages insured pursuant to section 238(c) of the Act. 207.254 Insurance endorsement.
( 2 ) For the purposes of subpart F of this part, all references in part 207 of this chapter to section 207 of the Act and to the term “mortgage” shall be construed to refer to section 241(f) of the Act and “equity or acquisition loan,” respectively.
( b ) *Projects without a HUD-insured or HUD-held mortgage.* The provisions of subpart D of this part shall be applicable to a project without a HUD-insured or HUD-held mortgage that is receiving an equity loan or acquisition loan under subpart E of this part in connection with a plan of action approved by the Commissioner under part 248 of this chapter.
( c ) All of the definitions in § 241.1005 apply to subpart F of this part. In addition, as used in subpart F of this part, the term “contract of insurance” means the agreement evidenced by the Commissioner's insurance endorsement and includes the provisions of subpart F of this part and of the Act.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2952 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2952

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
  eligibility of veterans for mortgage bond financing, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2005

   Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin (for himself and Mr. Herger) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
  eligibility of veterans for mortgage bond financing, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Veterans Homeownership Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ALL VETERANS ELIGIBLE FOR STATE HOME LOAN PROGRAMS FUNDED BY 
              QUALIFIED VETERANS' MORTGAGE BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 143(l)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining qualified veteran) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``at some time before January 1, 1977'' in 
        subparagraph (A), and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(B) who applied for the financing before the date 
                25 years after the last on which such veteran left 
                active service.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to financing provided and mortgage credit certificates issued 
after June 30, 2005.

SEC. 3. REVISION OF STATE VETERANS LIMIT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (B) of section 143(l)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to volume limitation) is 
amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) State veterans limit.--A State veterans limit 
                for any calendar year is the amount equal to--
                            ``(i) $215,000,000 for the State of Texas,
                            ``(ii) $265,000,000 for the State of 
                        California,
                            ``(iii) $100,000,000 for the State of 
                        Oregon,
                            ``(iv) $100,000,000 for the State of 
                        Wisconsin, and
                            ``(v) $100,000,000 for the State of 
                        Alaska.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to bonds issued after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3037 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from 

the definition of marihuana, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. FARR, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. STARK, and Mr. 

GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to exclude industrial hemp from the definition of marihuana, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Industrial Hemp 

5 Farming Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 3037 IH 

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF INDUSTRIAL HEMP FROM DEFINI2 TION OF MARIHUANA. 

3 Paragraph (16) of section 102 of the Controlled Sub4 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(16)) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(16)’’ at the beginning and in6 serting ‘‘(16)(A)’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub8 paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(B) The term ‘marihuana’ does not include indus10 trial hemp. As used in the preceding sentence, the term 

11 ‘industrial hemp’ means the plant Cannabis sativa L. and 

12 any part of such plant, whether growing or not, with a 

13 delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not 

14 exceed 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION TO BE MADE 

16 BY STATES. 

17 Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

18 U.S.C. 811) is amended by adding at the end the following 

19 new subsection: 

20 ‘‘(i) INDUSTRIAL HEMP DETERMINATION TO BE

21 MADE BY STATES.—In any criminal action, civil action, 

22 or administrative proceeding, a State regulating the grow23 ing and processing of industrial hemp under State law 

24 shall have exclusive authority to determine whether any 

25 such plant meets the concentration limitation set forth in 
3 

•HR 3037 IH 

1 subparagraph (B) of paragraph (16) of section 102 and 

2 such determination shall be conclusive and binding.’’. 

Æ
#### 14 Second Avenue Realty Corp. v. Anne Szalay, as Executrix of John Szalay, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal for failure to prosecute granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before May 1, 1962, with notice of argument for the June 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. That branch of the motion seeking to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal herein was not timely is denied, without prejudice, however, to a renewal thereof upon the argument of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISIDRO ROMERO,

Petitioner,

 v.

ROBERT WONG, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

No. C 09-1636 TEH (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit, Hayward

v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010)

(en banc), addressed important issues relating to federal habeas

review of BPH decisions denying parole to California state

prisoners. As such, the Court will provide each party an

opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not to exceed ten (10)

pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc

decision applies to the facts presented in Petitioner’s challenge to

BPH’s decision denying him parole. 

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-01636-TEH Document 7 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

The Court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than May 10, 2010, Respondent must send to

Petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than May 28, 2010, Respondent must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts presented

in Petitioner’s case. 

3. No later than July 2, 2010, Petitioner must file and

serve any supplemental brief applying Hayward to the facts presented

in his case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 05/03/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.09\Romero-09-1636-hayward briefing.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01636-TEH Document 7 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 2
### §9848. Comparability of wages

#### (a) Comparability of wages

The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to assure that persons employed in carrying out programs financed under this subchapter shall not receive compensation at a rate which is (1) in excess of the average rate of compensation paid in the area where the program is carried out to a substantial number of the persons providing substantially comparable services, or in excess of the average rate of compensation paid to a substantial number of the persons providing substantially comparable services in the area of the person's immediately preceding employment, whichever is higher; or (2) less than the minimum wage rate prescribed in section 206(a)(1) of title 29. The Secretary shall encourage Head Start agencies to provide compensation according to salary scales that are based on training and experience.

#### (b) Limitation

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be used to pay any part of the compensation of an individual employed by a Head Start agency, if such compensation, including non-Federal funds, exceeds an amount equal to the rate payable for level II of the Executive Schedule under section 5313 of title 5.

#### (2) Compensation

In this subsection, the term "compensation"—

(A) includes salary, bonuses, periodic payments, severance pay, the value of any vacation time, the value of a compensatory or paid leave benefit not excluded by subparagraph (B), and the fair market value of any employee perquisite or benefit not excluded by subparagraph (B); and

(B) excludes any Head Start agency expenditure for a health, medical, life insurance, disability, retirement, or any other employee welfare or pension benefit.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §653, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 507; Pub. L. 101–501, title I, §122, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1237; Pub. L. 110–134, §22, Dec. 12, 2007, 121 Stat. 1442.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–134 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1990—Pub. L. 101–501 inserted at end "The Secretary shall encourage Head Start agencies to provide compensation according to salary scales that are based on training and experience."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–501 effective Oct. 1, 1990, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 101–501, set out as a note under section 8621 of this title.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

BRETT ALLAN MARKER,

Appellant.

No. 73502-1-

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: MAR 2 1 2016

Per Curiam. Brett Marker appeals from the trial court's order dismissing

his CrR 7.8 motion with prejudice and denying his motion to dismiss without

prejudice. The State ofWashington concedes that dismissal with prejudice was

error. We accept the State's concession, reverse the trial court's order, and

remand for entry of an order dismissing Marker's CrR 7.8 motion without

prejudice. In light of our decision, Marker's statement of additional groundsfor

review is moot.

Reversed and remanded for entry of order dismissing the CrR 7.8 motion

without prejudice.

For the court:

V0,;m^'

.-o

t«e> , —tcr er\ ?550 3C —t_i

m J» _o vo o-ts

ro

—• *Tjr

3>-OfT5

s» t/>rn,~<

TX~ VO o


—*C3 CO

sr S<
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lee Turner, Appellant.

Motion granted to extent that order of July 1 amended to provide that appellant’s typewritten briefs be filed and served on or before September 29, 1960. Respondent directed to file and serve brief on or before October 6, 1960.
SERVED: May 15, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MA ITER OF 

ABO SUPPLY LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 0713 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

:.~::~' .. qi}ENT OF -,., ~·, ·.,.:_·§?C;1JA TIOi~ 

·- ulA(: I OPE PtA T/C,\8 

ZD/4 ::AY I b A 10: 22' 

The procedural order is amended consistent with the Hearing Notice. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. Unless amended herein, our prior Order remains in effect; 

2. On or before July 1, 2014, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, but 

not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Scott L. Johnston, Respondent's Counsel 

Givens & Johnston, PLLC 

950 Echo Lane, Suite 360 

Houston, TX 77024-2788 

TEL: 713-932-1540 

FAX: 713-932-1542 

WATTS: 800-285-8042 

ONE COPY 

EMAIL: sjohnston@givensjohnston.com 

James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest ·Region, ASW -7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 679 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5074 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: . 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0713 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
C

C

4 I ndep endent News papers nc. P.O. Box 7001 ‘Dover, Delaware’ 19903’ l800-282-8586 State of Delaware: :ss. Counties of Kent: Before me,a Notaxy Publi, for the County and State aforesaicL Wanda Ford-Waring. known to metobe such, who being sworn according
tolaw deposes and saysthat she is anofficer of Independent Newspaper mc,the Publisher of the The Delaware State News,

a daily newspaper published
at Dover, County of Kent, and State of Delaware, and that the no,

a copyof whi

as published
in the The Delaware State News in its issue of D.____ Sworn to and subseri before methis Day of
#### § 242.78 Zoning, deed, and building restrictions.

The project when completed shall not violate any material zoning or deed restrictions applicable to the project site, and shall comply with all applicable building and other governmental codes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SECTION CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ARC
COMMUNICATION INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         338,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  896,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    49,000
<INVENTORY>                                      6,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,247,000
<PP&E>                                         369,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,697,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          636,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    144,000
<COMMON>                                        14,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,412,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,697,000
<SALES>                                      3,418,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,418,000
<CGS>                                        3,171,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,171,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            234,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   234,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
### §§4457 to 4462. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–288, title VII, §703, formerly title VI, §603, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 164; renumbered title VII, §703, Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(1), (2), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3100

Section 4457, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §238, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1755, related to food stamp and surplus commodities programs.

Section 4458, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §239, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1755, related to legal services.

Section 4459, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §240, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1755, related to unemployment assistance.

Section 4460, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §241, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1756, related to community disaster grants to local governments.

Section 4461, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §242, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1756, related to timber sale contracts.

Section 4462, Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §243, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1757, related to standards for residential structure restoration.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1974, see section 605 of Pub. L. 93–288, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 5121 of this title.
### §§1361 to 1364. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792

Section 1361, Pub. L. 86–649, §2, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 506, defined "public lands".

Section 1362, Pub. L. 86–649, title I, §101, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 506, authorized the Secretary of the Interior to conduct investigations, etc., for improvement, management, use, and protection of public lands and resources.

Section 1362a, Pub. L. 91–429, Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 885, authorized contracts for use of aircraft, services, and supplies for protection from fire of public lands administered by the Secretary of the Interior.

Section 1363, Pub. L. 86–649, title I, §102, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 506, authorized cooperative agreements by Secretary of the Interior with respect to improvement, etc., of public lands and resources.

Section 1364, Pub. L. 86–649, title I, §103, July 14, 1960, 74 Stat. 506, authorized acceptance of contributions by Secretary of the Interior with respect to improvements, etc., of public lands and resources.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the repeal made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### § 180.615 Failure of party to appear.

A default decision may be entered against a party failing to appear at a hearing unless such party shows good cause for such failure.
### §1471g. Availability of appropriations to support Memorial Day and Fourth of July ceremonies and activities in National Capital Region

During the current fiscal year and on and after September 30, 1996, funds appropriated under this paragraph may be made available to the Department of the Interior to support the Memorial Day and Fourth of July ceremonies and activities in the National Capital Region.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(b) [title II], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–71, 3009–74.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This paragraph, referred to in text, contained additional provisions providing appropriations for expenses, not otherwise provided for, necessary for the operation and maintenance of the Army which are not classified to the Code.