alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-17-00125-CR NO. 02-17-00126-CR

MARVIN BRIGHT THOMAS A PPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 396TH DI STRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NOS. 1464244D, 1464246D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

---------- We have considered the “State’s Moti on to Dismiss Appeals as Moot” and appellant Marvin Bright Thomas’s response in which he agrees that his appeals are moot and that dismissal is appropriate. We grant th e motion and dismiss both appeals as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Ex parte Morgan , 335 S.W.2d 766, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 /s/ Elizabeth Kerr ELIZABETH KERR JUSTICE PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J .; KERR and PITTMAN, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: January 18, 2018
#### Michael Doyle et al., Appellants, v Barden and Robeson Corporation et al., Defendants, and Paul J. Game Construction et al., Respondents. Michael Doyle et al., Appellants, v Barden and Robeson Corporation et al., Defendants, and Derek Smith et al., Respondents. Michael Doyle et al., Appellants, v Barden and Robeson Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants. Michael Doyle et al., Appellants, v Barden and Robeson Corporation et al., Defendants and Milo Corporation, Respondent. Michael Doyle et al., Appellants, v Barden and Robeson Corporation et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No 1.)

(Appeal No. 2.)

(Appeal No. 3.)

(Appeal No. 4.)

(Appeal No. 5.)

[833 NYS2d 422]

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.
#### ALLURE HOME CREATION CO., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZAK DESIGNS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2006-1433.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 11, 2007.

Before RADER, GAJARSA, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Allure Home Creations Co., Inc. (“Allure”) sued Zak Designs, Inc. (“Zak”) for patent infringement of its United States Patent No. 6,155,411 (the ‘411 patent) and Zak counterclaimed seeking declarations of invalidity, non-infringement, and unenforceability for inequitable conduct. Zak also sought attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. The case was resolved when Allure filed a covenant not to sue Zak for any products made, used, offered to sell, or sold as of the date of the covenant. The district court then dismissed Zak’s claims with prejudice and denied Zak’s section 285 claims. Zak appeals these decisions. While this court agrees with the district court decision to deny attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285, this court finds that the district court erred in dismissing Zak’s counterclaims with prejudice. *See Intellectual Property Development, Inc. v. TCI Cablevision of California, Inc.,*248 F.3d 1333, 1342 (Fed.Cir.2001).

*899Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The decision of the district court denying attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 is *AFFIRMED.*

*2.*The decision of the district court dismissing Zak’s counterclaims with prejudice is *REVERSED*and *REMANDED*to the district court with instructions for the district court to enter a dismissal of Zak’s counterclaims without prejudice.
### §1526. Water salvage programs

The Secretary shall undertake programs for water salvage and ground water recovery along and adjacent to the main stream of the Colorado River. Such programs shall be consistent with maintenance of a reasonable degree of undistributed habitat for fish and wildlife in the area, as determined by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title III, §306, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 893.)
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0221

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GARY WAYNE TEMPLE, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including August 11, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 6 2022

07/06/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0221
### §2221. Identification of opportunities for water supply conservation, augmentation and use

The Secretary is authorized to conduct studies to identify opportunities to conserve, augment, and make more efficient use of water supplies available to Federal Reclamation projects and Indian water resource developments in order to be prepared for and better respond to drought conditions. The Secretary is authorized to provide technical assistance to States and to local and tribal government entities to assist in the development, construction, and operation of water desalinization projects, including technical assistance for purposes of assessing the technical and economic feasibility of such projects.

(Pub. L. 102–250, title II, §201, Mar. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 56.)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2755 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the income 

tax treatment of legal fees awarded or received in connection with nonphysical personal injury cases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for the income tax treatment of legal fees awarded or 

received in connection with nonphysical personal injury 

cases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Victims Tax Fairness 

5 Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2755 IH 

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNEC2 TION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY 

3 CASES. 

4 (a) INCLUSION IN GROSS INCOME.—Part II of sub5 chapter B of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

6 1986 (relating to items specifically included in gross in7 come) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

8 section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 91. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNEC10 TION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY 

11 CASES. 

12 ‘‘Gross income includes amounts awarded to or re13 ceived by the taxpayer, whether by suit or agreement, on 

14 account of nonphysical personal injury which are des15 ignated for attorneys’ fees and costs.’’. 

16 (b) DEDUCTION FOR LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RE17 CEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL

18 INJURY CASES ALLOWED WHETHER OR NOT TAXPAYER

19 ELECTS TO ITEMIZE.—Subsection (a) of section 62 of 

20 such Code (relating to general rule) is amended by redes21 ignating paragraph (19) (relating to costs involving dis22 crimination suits, etc. ) as paragraph (20) and by insert23 ing after such paragraph (20) the following new para24 graph: 

25 ‘‘(20) LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN

26 CONNECTION WITH NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY
3 

•HR 2755 IH 

1 CASES.—Attorneys’ fees and costs awarded to or 

2 paid by the taxpayer, whether by suit or agreement, 

3 on account of nonphysical personal injury.’’. 

4 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

5 for part II of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 91. Legal fees awarded or received in connection with nonphysical personal injury cases.’’. 

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply with respect to judgments and set9 tlements entered after the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act. 

Æ
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 9:06 AM

To: 'brian.j.godsen@delphi.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Ro b (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information



### Dear Mr. Godsen:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0788). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headqua rters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include the following: size and maximum wei ght (include payload) and whethe r the aircraft is fixed wing or

rotorcraft.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency sp ectrum. This information can be located in the

aircraft manual.

 Describe the proximity of the proposed opera tions to airports and populated areas.

 Your petition references a maintena nce inspection. Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe conditi on for operation in the NAS.

Please provide the additional information by December 22, 2014.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES−OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Roomlinx, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form


10−QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and


Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael S. Wasik,
Chief


Executive
Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the SARBANES−OXLEY Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operation of
the Company.




Date:
            9/25/08By:
            /s/
      Michael S. WasikMichael S. WasikChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting, which is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, January 19, 2004, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dough Gochnour, Designated Federal Officer, at 208-392-6681 or e-mail                         *dgochnour@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: December 14, 2004.

Lana S. Thurston,

Administrative Officer, Boise National Forest.

[FR Doc. 04-27815 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### Intercontinental Hotels Corporation (Puerto Rico) v. Jack Golden.

Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs. Concur-—-Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
### §2006. Environmental impact statements

#### (a) Preparation of environmental impact statements

Any Federal agency required under section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) to issue an environmental impact statement concerning a proposed crude oil transportation system eligible for consideration under this chapter shall, in preparing such statement, utilize, to the maximum extent practicable and consistent with such Act [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.], appropriate data, analyses, conclusions, findings, and decisions regarding environmental impacts developed or made by any other Federal or State agency.

#### (b) Filing of environmental impact statements

On or before December 1, 1978, all environmental impact statements concerning proposed crude oil transportation systems eligible for consideration under this chapter and required under section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 U.S.C. 4332] shall be completed, made available for public review and comment, revised to the extent appropriate in light of such comment, and submitted to the President and the Council on Environmental Quality; except that in the case of any environmental impact statement concerning any crude oil transportation system which is eligible for consideration and which was filed under section 2004(2) of this title, such actions may be taken not later than 60 days after December 1, 1978.

#### (c) Report of Council on Environmental Quality

Promptly after receiving an environmental impact statement referred to in subsection (b) for a crude oil transportation system, the Council on Environmental Quality shall submit to the President a report on the Council's opinion concerning such statement and concerning other matters related to the environmental impact of such system.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title V, §506, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3160.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Such Act, referred to in subsec. (a), means the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definition of "State agency" in section 2602 of Title 16, Conservation, applies to this section.
#### § 251.6 Method of payment of mortgage insurance premiums.

In the cases that the Commissioner deems appropriate, the Commissioner may require, by means of instructions communicated to all affected lenders, that mortgage insurance premiums be remitted electronically.

[63 FR 1303, Jan. 8, 1998]
IB 

Union Calendar No. 336 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3049 

[Report No. 109–585] 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known 

as the Lacey Act, to add certain species of carp to the list of injurious 

species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2005 

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JULY 20, 2006 

Additional sponsors: Mr. STUPAK, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. KLINE, Mr. EVANS, Mr. 

CONYERS, Mr. KIRK, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. PETRI

JULY 20, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known as the Lacey Act, to add certain species 

of carp to the list of injurious species that are prohibited 

from being imported or shipped. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 3049 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asian Carp Prevention 

5 and Control Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF SPECIES OF CARP TO THE LIST OF IN7 JURIOUS SPECIES THAT ARE PROHIBITED 

8 FROM BEING IMPORTED OR SHIPPED. 

9 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

10 amended by inserting after ‘‘Dreissena polymorpha;’’ the 

11 following: ‘‘of the black carp of the species 

12 Mylopharyngodon piceus; of the bighead carp of the spe13 cies Hypophthalmichthys nobilis; of the silver carp of the 

14 species Hypophthalmichthys molitrix; of the largescale sil15 ver carp of the species Hypophthalmichthys harmandi;’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 336 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3049 

[Report No. 109

–585] 

A BILL 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States 

shipped. cies that are prohibited from being imported or certain species of carp to the list of injurious speCode, popularly known as the Lacey Act, to add 

JULY 20, 2006 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 28.30 Response. ( a ) The respondent may file a written response to the complaint, in accordance with § 26.30 of this title, within 30 days of service of the complaint. The response shall be deemed to be a request for a hearing. The response must include the admission or denial of each allegation of liability made in the complaint; any defense on which the respondent intends to rely; any reasons why the penalties and assessments should be less than the amount set forth in the complaint; and the name, address, and telephone number of the person who will act as the respondent's representative, if any.
( b ) *Failure to respond.* If no response is submitted, HUD may file a motion for default judgment in accordance with § 26.41 of this chapter.
[73 FR 76832, Dec. 17, 2008]
Exhibit 21

                              Subsidiaries of Rand

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Name of Subsidiary            State or other jurisdiction of    Names under which such subsidiaries
                                      incorporation or organization                 do business
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>                    <C>
      Rand LL Holdings Corp.                     Delaware               Rand LL Holdings Corp.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Lower Lakes Towing Ltd.                      Canada                Lower Lakes Towing Ltd.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lower Lakes Transportation Company               Delaware               Lower Lakes Transportation Company
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Grand River Navigation Ltd.                   Delaware               Grand River Navigation Ltd.;

                                                                        GR Nav. (Name used in Michigan)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Port Dover Steamship Company Inc.                 Canada                Port Dover Steamship Company Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
### §390cc. New or amended contracts

#### (a) Generally

The provisions of this subchapter shall be applicable to any district which—

(1) enters into a contract with the Secretary subsequent to October 12, 1982;

(2) enters into any amendment of its contract with the Secretary subsequent to October 12, 1982, which enables the district to receive supplemental or additional benefits; or

(3) which amends its contract for the purpose of conforming to the provisions of this subchapter.

#### (b) Amendment of existing contracts

Any district which has an existing contract with the Secretary as of October 12, 1982, which does not enter into an amendment of such contract as specified in subsection (a) shall be subject to Federal reclamation law in effect immediately prior to October 12, 1982, as that law is amended or supplemented by sections 209 through 230 of this title [43 U.S.C. 390ii—390zz–1, 373a, 422e, 425b, 485h]. Within a district that does not enter into an amendment of its contract with the Secretary within four and one-half years of October 12, 1982, irrigation water may be delivered to lands leased in excess of a landholding of one hundred and sixty acres only if full cost, as defined in section 390bb(3)(A) of this title, is paid for such water as is assignable to those lands leased in excess of such landholding of one hundred and sixty acres: Provided, That the interest rate used in computing full cost under this subsection shall be the same as provided in section 390ee(a)(3) of this title.

#### (c) Election by qualified or limited recipients in absence of amendment to contract

In the absence of an amendment to a contract, as specified in subsection (a), a qualified recipient or limited recipient may elect to be subject to the provisions of this subchapter by executing an irrevocable election in a form approved by the Secretary to comply with this subchapter. The district shall thereupon deliver irrigation water to and collect from such recipient, for the credit of the United States, the additional charges required by this subchapter and assignable to the recipient making the election.

#### (d) Consent of non-Federal party

Amendments to contracts which are not required by the provisions of this subchapter shall not be made without the consent of the non-Federal party.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §203, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1264.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Federal reclamation law, referred to in subsec. (b), is defined in section 390aa of this title.

Sections 209 through 230 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b), are sections 209 through 230 of title II of Pub. L. 97–293, which enacted sections 390ii through 390zz–1 of this title, amended sections 373a, 422e, 425b, and 485h of this title, and repealed section 383 of Title 25, Indians.
### §391b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 3, 1931, ch. 435, §2, 46 Stat. 1507, related to reimbursement of general fund for moneys advanced under section 391a of this title. See section 391a–1 of this title.