alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McDonald *v.*Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.

April 9, 1912.

Action for damages. Before Judge Thomas. Tift superior court. July 6, 1911.

*W. B. Hammond,*for plaintiff.

*John I. Hall, J. H. Hall,*and *M. P. Hall,*for defendant.

Atkinson, J.

Grounds of general and special demurrer were urged to the plaintiff’s petition filed in the city court. The judge ruled that the “same is ordered sustained, and the case is dismissed, unless the plaintiff will amend his declaration, before the next term of this court, to meet the objections raised by the demurrer.” No amendment was offered and allowed within the specified time; but at the ensuing term the judge passed another order, reciting the one above named, also reciting the fact that no amendment had been filed, and adjudging that the defendant “do have and recover of the plaintiff” the costs, etc. To a subsequent suit filed by the plaintiff in the superior court on the same cause of action, the defendant pleaded the judgment on demurrer rendered in the city court as res ad judicata. *Held,*that there was no error in refusing to strike such plea; and upon the introduction of uncontradicted evidence supporting it, there was no error in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

,(ft) The request to review and reverse or modify the ruling made in the second headnote of the case of *Gunn*v. *James,*120 *Ga.*482 (48 S. E. 148), which has been followed as late as *McClaren*v. *Williams,*132 *Ga.*352 (64 S. E. 65), is refused.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### SUGDEN, Appellant, v. PARTRIDGE, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Divsion, First Department.

January 16, 1903.)

In the matter of Edward D. Sugden against John N. Partridge, commissioner. W. C. De Witt, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the opinion in Lahey v. Partridge (decided Jan. 9, 1903) 79 N. Y. Supp. 724.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6529
BERNARD ALLEN MAYLES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF A MERICA; FEDERAL BUREAU OFPRISONS, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Morgantown, West Virginia, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. K idd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-7-1) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Allen Mayles, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mayles v. United States , No. CA-96-7-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00476-CR

Derrick Lee Holzhey

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 297th District Court

of Tarrant County (1236778D)

December 6, 2012

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
2

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00476-CR

NO. 02-12-00477-CR

NO. 02-12-00478-CR

DERRICK LEE HOLZHEY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Derrick Lee Holzhey attempts to appeal from his three

convictions and concurrent two-year sentences for two assault on a public 

servant charges and one charge of burglary of a habitation. The trial court’s 

certification of his right to appeal for each of these convictions states that this “is 

a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
3

On October 11, 2012, this court notified appellant about the statement on 

the trial court’s certifications and informed him that unless he or any party 

desiring to continue the appeals filed with the court, on or before October 22, 

2012, a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals, the appeals may 

be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3. We have received no 

response. Therefore, we dismiss these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 

43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 6, 2012
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

IO GROUP, INC,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

 JASON JORDON,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-00884 MEJ

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING

RE: MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT (DKT. #57)

This matter is currently scheduled for a April 1, 2010 hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for

Default Judgment. (Dkt. #57.) Please take notice that the hearing has been continued to April 15,

2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 15, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00884-MEJ Document 62 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IO GROUP, INC,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 JORDON,

Defendant. /

Case Number: 09-00884 MEJ 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California.

That on March 15, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said

copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said

envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle

located in the Clerk's office.

Jason Jordon

P.O. Box 91742

Atlanta, GA 30364

Jason Jordan

nubian101@gmail.com 

Dated: March 15, 2010

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:09-cv-00884-MEJ Document 62 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 203.366 Conveyance of marketable title. ( a ) *Satisfactory conveyance of title and transfer of possession.* The mortgagee shall tender to the Commissioner a satisfactory conveyance of title and transfer of possession of the property. The deed or other instrument of conveyance shall convey good marketable title to the property, which shall be accompanied by title evidence satisfactory to the Commissioner.
( b ) *Conveyance of property without good marketable title.* ( 1 ) For mortgages insured under firm commitments issued on or after November 19, 1992, or under direct endorsement processing where the credit worksheet was signed by the mortgagee's underwriter on or after November 19, 1992, if the title to the property conveyed by the mortgagee to the Secretary is not good and marketable, the mortgagee must correct any title defect within 60 days after receiving notice from the Secretary, or within such further time as the Secretary may approve in writing.
( 2 ) If the defect is not corrected within 60 days, or such further time as the Secretary approves in writing, the mortgagee must reimburse the Secretary for HUD's costs of holding the property, accruing on a daily basis, and interest on the amount of insurance benefits paid to the mortgagee at an interest rate set in conformity with the Treasury Fiscal Requirements Manual from the date of such notice to the date the defect is corrected or until the Secretary reconveys the property to the mortgagee, as described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. The daily holding costs to be charged a mortgagee shall include the costs specified in § 203.364 of this part.
( 3 ) If the title defect is not corrected within a reasonable time, as determined by HUD, the Secretary will, after notice, reconvey the property to the mortgagee and the mortgagee must reimburse the Secretary in accordance with §§ 203.363 and 203.364 of this part.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 57 FR 47972, Oct. 20, 1992; 61 FR 36453, July 10, 1996]
#### COLWELL et al., Appellants, v. FRIEDL, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by Edward J. Colwell and Louis Unverzagt against Michael Friedl. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
### §9859b. Programs

The Secretary shall make allotments to eligible States under section 9859c of this title. The Secretary shall make the allotments to enable the States to establish programs to improve the health and safety of children receiving child care outside the home, by preventing illnesses and injuries associated with that care and promoting the health and well-being of children receiving that care.

(Pub. L. 106–310, div. A, title XIV, §1403, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1143.)
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code), I, John W. Elias, Chief Executive Officer of Edge PetroleumCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to myknowledge, that:

 

(1)           the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the three months ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:November 8, 2007 |                    | /s/ John W. Elias |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|                   | John W. Elias           |
|                   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### McCOY, Respondent, v. MUNRO, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by William McCoy, an infant, etc., against George W. Munro.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
WAIVER

    


    This
WAIVER, dated as of February 4, 2009, is duly executed by DB Trustees (Hong
Kong) Limited (the "Trustee"), acting as trustee
on behalf of the holders of 100% of the RMB 290,000,000 principal amount of 5.0%
Guaranteed Senior Notes due 2014 (the "Notes") issued by China
Natural Gas, Inc. (the "Company") pursuant to that
certain Indenture dated January 29, 2008 (the "Indenture").

    


    WHEREAS,
per the terms and conditions of the Indenture and issuance of the Notes, the
Company agreed to have its shares of common stock listed on the NASDAQ Capital
Market, the NASDAQ Global Market or the New York Stock Exchange ("Qualifying Listing") on or
before January 29, 2009 or maintain such Qualifying Listing as of January 29,
2009, and meet this obligation (the "Additional
Interest");

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company has not been able to meet the foregoing obligation under the
Indenture due to the drop of its stock price as a result of changed market
conditions in spite of the Company's effort to complete the Qualifying
Listing;

    


    WHEREAS,
the Trustee, has sought and received written consent from 100% of the holders of
the Notes to execute this Waiver;

    


    WHEREAS,
the Trustee, acting upon the written instructions of 100% of the holders of the
Notes, agrees to waive the Company's Qualifying Listing obligation and payment
of the Additional Interest for a period of three (3) months from January 29,
2009 hereof (the "Waiver");

    


    NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the Company's actions, the
Trustee, acting upon the written instruction of 100% of the holders of the
Notes, hereby agrees to waive the Company's Qualifying Listing obligation and
payment of Additional Interest for a period of three (3) months from the date
hereof.  Upon the expiration this Waiver, if the Company has failed to
achieve a Qualifying Listing, any and all Additional Interest shall accrue from
January 29, 2009 onwards.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Investor has caused this Waiver to be duly
executed by their authorized officer as of the date first written
above.

    


    
      
        
          	 
      	
                  TRUSTEE

                
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  DB
      Trustees (Hong Kong) Limited

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                  By:

                	
                  /s/AricKayRussell

                
	 
      	
                  Name:  Aric
      Kay Russell

                
	 
      	
                  Title:   
      Director
#### § 201.4 Rules of construction.

As used in this part, and unless the context indicates otherwise, words in the singular include the plural, and words in the plural include the singular.

[56 FR 52429, Oct. 18, 1991]
### §7642. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such amount, not to exceed $30,000,000, as may be necessary for the purposes of this subchapter.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title IV, §403, as added Pub. L. 91–604, §14, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1710.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 403 of act July 14, 1955, as added by Pub. L. 101–549, title IV, §401, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2589, is classified to section 7651b of this title.

Section was formerly classified to section 1858a of this title.
#### § 26.8 Standards of practice.

Attorneys shall conform to the standards of professional and ethical conduct required of practitioners in the courts of the United States and by the bars of which the attorneys are members. Any attorney may be prohibited by the hearing officer from representing a party if the attorney is not qualified under § 26.7 or if such action is necessary to maintain order in or the integrity of the pending proceeding.
### §9521. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §902(e)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 560

Section, Pub. L. 96–398, title VIII, §801, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1605, related to employee protection arrangements.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 902(h) of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 238l of this title.
§ 229.215 Membership practices of certain organizations. ( a ) *Social fraternities and sororities.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of social fraternities and sororities that are exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), the active membership of which consists primarily of students in attendance at institutions of higher education.
( b ) *YMCA, YWCA, Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA), the Girl Scouts, the Boy Scouts, and Camp Fire Girls.
( c ) *Voluntary youth service organizations.* These Title IX regulations do not apply to the membership practices of a voluntary youth service organization that is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. 501(a), and the membership of which has been traditionally limited to members of one sex and principally to persons of less than nineteen years of age.
#### E. Van De Veire, appellee, v. Koenig Dairy, Inc., Daniel Jeffries and Otto Wohlt, appellants.

Gen. No. 28,124.

Action in forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Bernard P. Barasa, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

George C. Geier, for appellants. Frank F. Tollkuehn, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §9802. "Community development corporation" defined

For purposes of this subchapter, the term "community development corporation" means a nonprofit organization responsible to residents of the area it serves which is receiving financial assistance under part A and any organization more than 50 percent of which is owned by such an organization, or otherwise controlled by such an organization, or designated by such an organization for the purpose of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §613, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 489.)
### §1212. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1212 was editorially reclassified as section 1476a of this title.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00095

- CR

Douglas Lynn Kirk

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

o f Tarr ant County (1266320R )

January 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

Dissent by Justice Dauphinot

(p)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no erro r in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bob McCoy

___________________ Justice Bob McCoy
### §2214. Applicable period of drought program

#### (a) In general

The programs and authorities established under this subchapter shall become operative in any Reclamation State and in the State of Hawaii only after the Governor or Governors of the affected State or States, or on a reservation, when the governing body of the affected tribe has made a request for temporary drought assistance and the Secretary has determined that such temporary assistance is merited, or upon the approval of a drought contingency plan as provided in subchapter II of this chapter.

#### (b) Coordination with BPA

If a Governor referred to in subsection (a) is the Governor of the State of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, or Montana, the Governor shall coordinate with the Administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration before making a request under subsection (a).

#### (c) Termination of authority

The authorities established under this subchapter shall terminate on September 30, 2022.1

(Pub. L. 102–250, title I, §104, Mar. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 56; Pub. L. 106–566, title II, §201(a), Dec. 23, 2000, 114 Stat. 2820; Pub. L. 109–234, title II, §2306(a), June 15, 2006, 120 Stat. 456; Pub. L. 111–212, title I, §404(a), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2313; Pub. L. 113–76, div. D, title II, §206, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 164; Pub. L. 115–141, div. D, title II, §203(a), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 519; Pub. L. 116–260, div. D, title II, §207(a), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 1363; Pub. L. 117–103, div. D, title II, §206(a), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 117–103 substituted "2022" for "2021".

2020—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–260 substituted "2021" for "2020".

2018—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–141 substituted "2020" for "2017".

2014—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 113–76 substituted "2017" for "2012".

2010—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–212 substituted "September 30, 2012" for "September 30, 2010".

2006—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 109–234 substituted "September 30, 2010" for "September 30, 2005".

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–566, §201(a)(1), inserted "and in the State of Hawaii" after "Reclamation State".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–566, §201(a)(2), substituted "on September 30, 2005" for "ten years after March 5, 1992".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Extension of Termination of Authority

Pub. L. 118–42, div. D, title II, §206(a), Mar. 9, 2024, 138 Stat. 194, provided that: "Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) shall be applied by substituting '2024' for '2022'."

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 117–328, div. D, title II, §206(a), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 4631.

1 See Extension of Termination of Authority note below.
### §§270–13 to 270–17. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 270–13, act Mar. 8, 1922, ch. 96, §3, as added Aug. 17, 1961, Pub. L. 87–147, 75 Stat. 384; amended Oct. 3, 1962, Pub. L. 87–742, 76 Stat. 740, authorized sale or other disposition of Alaskan lands containing coal, oil, or gas deposits. Section was formerly classified to section 377a of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Section 270–14, act July 8, 1916, ch. 228, §3, formerly §2, 39 Stat. 352, renumbered June 28, 1918, ch. 110, 40 Stat. 633, excepted certain lands in Alaska from homestead entry and settlement. Section was formerly classified to section 378 of Title 48.

Section 270–15, acts Apr. 13, 1926, ch. 121, §1, 44 Stat. 243; Apr. 29, 1950, ch. 134, §3, 64 Stat. 93, related to claims and rectangular system of surveys and departure for local or topographic conditions.

Section 270–16, acts Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; Apr. 13, 1926, ch. 121, §2, 44 Stat. 244; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to additional entries by soldiers.

Section 270–17, act Apr. 13, 1926, ch. 121, §3, 44 Stat. 244, related to disposition of deposit of estimated cost of work incident to survey, and promulgation of rules and regulations.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### § 96.73 [Reserved]
### §§9631 to 9633. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–499, title V, §517(c)(1), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1774

Section 9631, Pub. L. 96–510, title II, §221, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2801; Pub. L. 99–499, title II, §204, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1696, provided for establishment of a Hazardous Substances Superfund, so redesignated by section 204 of Pub. L. 99–499. See section 9507 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

Section 9632, Pub. L. 96–510, title II, §222, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2802, limited liability of United States to amount in Trust Fund.

Section 9633, Pub. L. 96–510, title II, §223, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2802, contained administrative provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal by Pub. L. 99–499 effective Jan. 1, 1987, see section 517(e) of Pub. L. 99–499, set out as an Effective Date note under section 9507 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.