alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      3.14**


**Certificate
      of Amendment**


***to***


**Certificate
      of Incorporation**


***of***


**Global
      Matrechs, Inc.**




It
      is
      hereby certified that:




1.
 
      The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the “Corporation”) is Global
      Matrechs, Inc.




2.
 
      That Article IV of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
      the
      Corporation, as amended, be further amended to increase the number of shares
      of
      the common stock, $.0001 par value per share, authorized for issuance thereunder
      by deleting the first paragraph thereof in its entirety and replacing said
      paragraph with the following paragraph:




“ IV




The
      total
      number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation is authorized to issue
      is Nine Hundred One Million divided into two classes as follows:




(1)
        Nine Hundred Million (900,000,000) shares of common stock, $.0001 par
      value per share (“Common Stock”); and




(2)
        One Million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per
      share (“Preferred Stock”).”




The
      remainder of Article IV shall remain unchanged.




3.  The
      amendments set forth in this Certificate of Amendment have been duly adopted
      by
      the Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.




***[Remainder
      of page intentionally left blank]***







1





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to
      Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by Michael Sheppard, its President
      and
      Chief Executive Officer, thereto duly authorized, this 27 th day of
      April, 2006.




GLOBAL
                MATRECHS, INC.By:
            /s/ Michael
                Sheppard







2
### §5850. Unresolved safety issues plan

The Commission shall develop a plan providing for the specification and analysis of unresolved safety issues relating to nuclear reactors and shall take such action as may be necessary to implement corrective measures with respect to such issues. Such plan shall be submitted to the Congress on or before January 1, 1978 and progress reports shall be included in the annual report of the Commission thereafter.

(Pub. L. 93–438, title II, §210, as added Pub. L. 95–209, §3, Dec. 13, 1977, 91 Stat. 1482.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Another section 210 of Pub. L. 93–438 was renumbered section 211 and is classified to section 5851 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain functions from Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Chairman thereof, see Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1980, 45 F.R. 40561, 94 Stat. 3585, set out as a note under section 5841 of this title.
### §1600j. Federal leases

#### (a) Lease of lands owned in whole or in part by United States within Floodway; determination of consistency with operation and maintenance

No lease of lands owned in whole or in part by the United States and within the Colorado River Floodway shall be granted after October 8, 1986, unless the Secretary determines that such lease would be consistent with the operation and maintenance of the Colorado River Floodway.

#### (b) Extension of existing leases; minimization of inconsistency with operation and maintenance of Floodway

No existing lease of lands owned in whole or in part by the United States and within the Colorado River Floodway shall be extended beyond October 8, 1986, or the stated expiration date of its current term, whichever is later, unless the lessee agrees to take reasonable and prudent steps determined to be necessary by the Secretary to minimize the inconsistency of operation under such lease with the operation and maintenance of the Colorado River Floodway.

#### (c) Lease of lands owned in whole or in part by United States between Hoover Dam and Davis Dam

No lease of lands owned in whole or part by the United States between Hoover Dam and Davis Dam below elevation 655.0 feet on Lake Mohave shall be granted unless the Secretary determines that such lease would be consistent with the operation of Lake Mohave.

#### (d) Lease operations on Indian lands

The provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall not apply to lease operations on Indian lands pursuant to a lease providing for activities which are exempted under section 1600e of this title.

#### (e) Lands held in trust by United States for benefit of Indian tribes or individuals

Subsections (a) and (b) of this section shall not apply to lands held in trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or individual with respect to any lease where capital improvements, and operation and maintenance costs are not provided for by Federal financial assistance if the lessee, tribe, or individual has provided insurance or other security for the benefit of the Secretary sufficient to insure against all reasonably forseeable,1 direct, and consequential damages to the property of the tribe, private persons, and the United States, which may result from the proposed lease.

(Pub. L. 99–450, §13, Oct. 8, 1986, 100 Stat. 1135.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "foreseeable,".
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARYLYN BEAVER,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BANK OF THE WEST WELFARE

BENEFITS PLAN, and BANCWEST

CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT

PLAN, 

Defendants. /

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest. /

No. C 09-02177 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

AND VACATING HEARING

At the case management conference held on July 8, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file a

motion for entitlement to ERISA benefits by July 15, with a hearing scheduled for August 12

(Dkt. No. 60). Plaintiff failed to file the motion as ordered and instead filed a “notice of

settlement.” It is now August 2 and the case has still not been dismissed. Plaintiff is therefore

ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. A

response will be due by 8:00 A.M. ON AUGUST 12, unless a stipulated dismissal is filed before the

deadline. The August 12 hearing is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02177-WHA Document 63 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 1
#### NEW YORK BACTERIOLOGICAL INST., Appellant, v. NERESHEIMER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 9, 1903.)

Action by the New York Bacteriological Institute against Emil A. Neresheimer. H. B. Wesselman, for appellant. H. F. Kingsley, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### In the Matter of Kenneth Jacobs, as Executor of Morris Jacobs, Deceased, as Stockholder of Ostow & Jacobs, Inc., in Behalf of Himself and for the Benefit of Said Corporation, Respondent, v. Ostow & Jacobs, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order entered on September 6, 1960 setting aside the election of a director and officers of Ostow & Jacobs, Inc., enjoining the incumbent officers from continuing to act as such; directing a meeting of stockholders for the election of an additional director and a meeting of the directors, following such stockholders’ meeting, for the election of new officers; appointing inspectors of election; and awarding counsel fees and expenses, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the petition dismissed, with $10 costs. The power of a court *614under section 25 of the General Corporation Law is to confirm an election or order a new election, as justice may require. *(Matter of Faehndrich,*2 N Y 2d 468, 47A-475.) The relief granted herein goes far beyond that restricted power. Moreover, since eoneededly the two surviving directors continued to hold over, they were empowered to act in the conduct of the affairs of the corporation, even if the one director, who succeeded a deceased director, did not continue in office after the end of the one-year term. Hence, officers elected by the two directors effectively received a majority vote of the unquestionably qualified number of the board of directors, and the court was without power to order them removed without cause. Finally, the ordering of a new election was an obvious futility. There was no proof or claim that a new election would produce any different result, where, as it appears here, the contending parties each own 50% of the stock of the corporation. *A*new election could not possibly eliminate the impasse. Perhaps, the only solution for the objecting stockholder is the remedy granted under section 103 of the General Corporation Law which provides for a dissolution in the event of a deadlock. Although there are some members of this court who are of the opinion that the director elected to fill the vacancy continued to hold office until his successor had been duly elected, as did those directors elected for a full term, it is unnecessary to decide that question in view of our disposition of the proceeding on the other grounds hereinabove stated. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications.  Supplement 1:  Transport propertiesAn addition to the computer program of NASA SP-273 is given that permits transport property calculations for the gaseous phase. Approximate mixture formulas are used to obtain viscosity and frozen thermal conductivity. Reaction thermal conductivity is obtained by the same method as in NASA TN D-7056. Transport properties for 154 gaseous species were selected for use with the program.Document ID19850008354Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGordon, S.*(Gordon (Sanford) and Associates Cleveland, OH, United States)*Mcbride, B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Zeleznik, F. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1984Subject CategoryThermodynamics And Statistical PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-86885E-2348NAS 1.15:86885Accession Number85N16663Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-42Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850008354.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Berthold and Helena John, appellees, v. Christ W. Dahnke, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,633.

Suit for damages for alleged defective construction of oil tanks for heating plant. Judgment for plaintiffs. See Dahnke v. John, *infra,*this volume. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Greenway, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first .district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 9, 1923.

Rehearing denied June 5, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Goldzier, Rodgers & Froehlich, for appellant. William Reeda and Oke L. Pearson, for appellees; Amos W. Marston, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §§616ggg to 616mmm. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616ggg, Pub. L. 89–292, §1, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1068, authorized construction, operation, and maintenance of the Southern Nevada project, Nevada.

Section 616hhh, Pub. L. 89–292, §2, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1068, related to allocation of project costs and to repayment of these allocated project costs.

Section 616iii, Pub. L. 89–292, §3, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1068, related to commencement of construction of this project, transfer of the care, operation and maintenance of this project to a State agency and to the permanent use of project facilities by Nevada.

Section 616jjj, Pub. L. 89–292, §4, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1069, related to construction costs allocated to defense installations.

Section 616kkk, Pub. L. 89–292, §5, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1069, related to control of diverted waters.

Section 616lll, Pub. L. 89–292, §6, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1069; Pub. L. 89–510, July 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 312, related to contract provisions for subordination of rights of contracting parties to those of Basic Management, Inc. or its assignees.

Section 616mmm, Pub. L. 89–292, §7, Oct. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 1069, authorized appropriations for this project.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2976 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(2-), [3-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)– 

4-[[2-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)–1-naphthale yl]azo-.kappa.N2]-1- 

naphthalenesulfonato(3-)][1-[[2-(hydroxy kappa.O)–5-[4- 

methoxyphenyl)azo]phenyl]azo-.kappa.N2]-2-nap hthalenolato(2-)- 

.kappa.O]-, disodium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(2-), [3-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)–4-[[2-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)–1-naphthale 

yl]azo-.kappa.N2]-1-naphthalenesulfonato(3-)][1-[[2-(hydroxy kappa.O)–5-[4-methoxyphenyl)azo]phenyl]azo- 

.kappa.N2]-2-nap hthalenolato(2-)-.kappa.O]-, disodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2976 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CHROMATE(2-), [3-(HYDROXY-.KAPPA.O)–4-[[2- 

2 (HYDROXY-.KAPPA.O)–1-NAPHTHALENYL]AZO3 .KAPPA.N2]-1-NAPHTHALENESULFONATO(3- 

4 )][1-[[2-(HYDROXY-.KAPPA.O)–5-[4- 

5 METHOXYPHENYL)AZO]PHENYL]AZO6 .KAPPA.N2]-2-NAPHTHALENOLATO(2-)- 

7 .KAPPA.O]-, DISODIUM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

9 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

10 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

11 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.22.05 Chromate(2-), [3-(hydroxy- 

.kappa.O)–4-[[2-(hydroxy- 

.kappa.O)–1- 

naphthalenyl]azo- 

.kappa.N2]-1- 

naphthalenesulfonato(3-)][1- 

[[2-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)–5-[4- 

methoxyphenyl)azo]phenyl]azo-.kappa.N2]- 

2-naphthalenolato(2-)- 

.kappa.O]-, disodium (CAS 

No. 30785–74–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.12.45) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ JOHN EMERYJohn EmeryChief Executive Officer
### §8431. Notice of violation; other general provisions

#### (a) Notice of violation

(1) Whenever, on the basis of any information available, the Secretary finds that any person is in violation of any provision of this chapter, or any rule or order thereunder, the Secretary shall issue notice of such violation. Any notice issued under this subsection shall be in writing and shall state with reasonable specificity the nature of the violation.

(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed to relieve any person of liability under the other provisions of this chapter for any act or omission occurring before the issuance of notice.

#### (b) Individual liability of corporate personnel

Any individual director, officer, or agent of a corporation who willfully authorizes, orders, or performs any of the acts or practices constituting in whole or in part a violation of this chapter, or any rule or order thereunder, shall be subject to penalties under this section without regard to any penalties to which the corporation may be subject, except that no such individual director, officer, or agent shall be subject to imprisonment under section 8432 of this title, unless he also knew of noncompliance by the corporation or had received from the Secretary notice of noncompliance by the corporation.

#### (c) Repealed. Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(18), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 313

#### (d) Federal agencies

The provisions of sections 8432 and 8433 of this title shall not be construed to apply to any Federal agency or officer or employee thereof acting in his official capacity.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title VII, §721, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3333; Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(18), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 313.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1987—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–42 struck out subsec. (c) which read as follows: "No person shall be subject to any penalty under this part with respect to the operation of any powerplant in excess of that allowed by an exemption granted on the basis of the operation of such powerplant as a peakload powerplant if it is demonstrated to the Secretary that such operation was necessary to meet peakload demand and that other peakload powerplants within the same system as such powerplant—

"(1) were unavailable for service—

"(A) due to unit or system outages; or

"(B) because operation of such other powerplants would result in their exceeding the hours of operation allowed under an exemption; and

"(2) have not been operated other than to meet peakload demand."
#### In the Matter of Louis J. Palumbo, Petitioner, v Louis J. Frank, as Commissioner of Police of the County of Nassau, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated February 26, 1976 and made after a hearing, which found petitioner guilty of two specifications and fined him a total of three days’ pay. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with $50 costs and disbursements. In our opinion substantial evidence was adduced at the departmental hearing to sustain findings that petitioner failed to make an hourly call over a departmental telephone, and also failed to acknowledge a radio call that a burglary was in progress, in violation of the department’s rules and regulations. Hopkins, J. P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2490

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostS. Daddona Memorial Post Office’’. Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Mayor Joseph al Service located at 442 West Hamilton Street, 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2490

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 442 West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Mayor Joseph S. Daddona Memorial 

Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 2490 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 442 West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsyl4 vania, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mayor Jo5 seph S. Daddona Memorial Post Office’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Mayor Joseph S. Daddona Memorial Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2005. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 221.325 Cancellation of hazard insurance.

The provisions of § 203.382 of this chapter are incorporated by reference and shall apply to hazard insurance policies carried solely for the family unit.