alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1748a–2. Reporting requirements

#### (a) In general

Not later than 90 days after the end of the fiscal year for which additional new budget authority is used, pursuant to section 901(b)(2)(F)(i) of title 2, as added by section 102 of this division, the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture (as applicable), in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, shall—

(1) prepare an annual report with respect to the additional new budget authority;

(2) submit to the Committees on Appropriations, the Budget, and Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committees on Appropriations, the Budget, and Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate the annual report prepared under paragraph (1); and

(3) make the report prepared under paragraph (1) available to the public.

#### (b) Components

The annual report prepared under subsection (a)(1) shall—

(1) document obligations and outlays of the additional new budget authority for wildfire suppression operations;

(2) identify risk-based factors that influenced management decisions with respect to wildfire suppression operations;

(3) analyze a statistically significant sample of large fires, including an analysis for each fire of—

(A) cost drivers;

(B) the effectiveness of risk management techniques and whether fire operations strategy tracked the risk assessment;

(C) any resulting ecological or other benefits to the landscape;

(D) the impact of investments in wildfire suppression operations preparedness;

(E) effectiveness of wildfire suppression operations, including an analysis of resources lost versus dollars invested;

(F) effectiveness of any fuel treatments on fire behavior and suppression expenditures;

(G) levels of exposure experienced by firefighters;

(H) suggested corrective actions; and

(I) any other factors the Secretary of the Interior or Secretary of Agriculture (as applicable) determines to be appropriate;

(4) include an accounting of overall fire management and spending by the Department of the Interior or the Department of Agriculture, which shall be analyzed by fire size, cost, regional location, and other factors;

(5) describe any lessons learned in the conduct of wildfire suppression operations; and

(6) include any other elements that the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture (as applicable) determines to be necessary.

(Pub. L. 115–141, div. O, title I, §104, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1061.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 102 of this division, referred to in subsec. (a), means section 102 of div. O of Pub. L. 115–141.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Wildfire Suppression Funding and Forest Management Activities Act, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018, and not as part of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 which comprises this chapter.
#### In the Matter of Buffalo Courier Express, Inc., Petitioner, v Norman A. Stiller, as Justice of the New York State Supreme Court, et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: We cannot say that under all of the circumstances including the extraordinary degree of public attention the case had received, the Trial Justice abused his discretion in ordering the pretrial suppression hearing to be closed *(Matter of Gannett Co. v De Pasquale,*43 NY2d 370). As stated in the Court of Appeals in *Gannett:*"To allow public disclosure of potentially tainted evidence, which the trial court has the constitutional obligation to exclude, is to involve the court itself in the illegality. This potential taint of its own process can neither be condoned nor countenanced. To avoid becoming a link in the chain of prejudicial disclosures, trial courts have the power to exclude the public from pretrial suppression hearings”. *Matter of Gannett Co. v De Pasquale, supra,*p 380.) The court further stated: "At the point where press commentary on those hearings would threaten the impaneling of a constitutionally impartial jury in the county of venue, pretrial evidentiary hearings in this State are presumptively to be closed to the public. As the locus of public interest, this determination is to rest with the hearing Judge” (p 380). We note that by terms of Justice Stiller’s order, the transcript of the hearing will he made available to the public at the conclusion of the trial. Present—Cardamone, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
§ 221.761 Forbearance relief. ( a ) In a case where the mortgage is in default, the mortgagor and the mortgagee may enter into a forbearance agreement for the reduction or suspension of regular mortgage payments for a specified period of time, if the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) The mortgage was endorsed for insurance on or after July 7, 1961.
( 2 ) The Commissioner determines that the default was due to circumstances beyond the mortgagor's control and that the mortgage probably will be restored to good standing within a reasonable period of time and evidences such determination by written approval of the forbearance agreement.
( b ) The time specified in § 207.258(a) of this chapter, within which a mortgagee shall give the Commissioner written notice of its intention to file an insurance claim, shall be suspended for the period of time specified in the forbearance agreement as long as the mortgagor complies with the requirements of such agreement.
( c ) If the mortgagor fails to meet the requirements of a forbearance agreement or to cure the default under the mortgage at the expiration of the forbearance period, and such failure continues for a period of 30 days, the mortgagee shall notify the Commissioner of such failure. Within 45 days thereafter, unless a modification or extension of the forbearance agreement has been approved by the Commissioner, the mortgagee shall notify the Commissioner of its election to file an insurance claim and of its decision to either assign the mortgage to the Commissioner or to acquire and convey title to the property to the Commissioner. If the mortgage is assigned to the Commissioner, the special insurance benefits prescribed in § 221.763 shall be applicable.
[36 FR 24587, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 51 FR 27838, Aug. 4, 1986]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999

<CASH>                                            259,652
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,393,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                6,138,507
<PP&E>                                         76,068,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,393,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,572,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,237,321
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           77,586
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,657,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,572,164
<SALES>                                         3,542,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,542,188
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,820,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (38,326)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (305,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (305,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (305,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.04)





</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAL ROSELLI, JORGE RODRIGUEZ, JOAN

EMSLIE, JOHN BORSOS, JOHN VELLARDITA,

GABE KRISTAL, PAUL KUMAR, MARTHA

FIGUEROA, BARBARA LEWIS, PHYLLIS

WILLETT, DANIEL MARTIN, LAURA KURRE,

RALPH CORNEJO, WILL CLAYTON, GLENN

GOLDSTEIN, FRED SEAVEY, MARK KIPFER,

AARON BRICKMAN, IAN SELDEN, GAIL

BUHLER, FREJA NELSON, ANDREW REID,

NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS,

MARYRUTH GROSS, CONNIE WILSON, ARLENE

PEASNALL, CHERIE KUNOLD, FAYE LINCOLN,

and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00404 WHA

NOTICE RE FILING

DOCUMENTS

DURING ECF

SHUTDOWN

The parties may e-file pdf versions of documents to Judge Alsup’s proposed orders

mailbox at: whapo@cand.uscourts.gov during the weekend of April 2–4, 2010, when ECF is

down for maintenance. Please observe all deadlines. Counsel should e-file their documents when

ECF comes back online after 6:00 p.m. on Sunday, April 4, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 593 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 1
1

Ogulei, David

From: Klarich, David <david.klarich@veolia.com>

Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 3:11 PM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: Units 2 and 3 Operation

David, 

Regarding the in-service dates for Unit 2 and Unit 3, Unit 2 came on-line in October, 1986 and Unit 3 came online in November, 1987. 

Please contact me if you have any further questions. 

Dave
EX-10.1


   

  Exhibit 10.1

  DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

  Our non-employee director compensation program consists of both a cash component and an equity component. Non-employee directors are also able to elect to receive their annual base retainers in equity, as further described below. We do not compensate members of the Board of Directors or committees on a per-meeting basis.

  Annual Retainers

  Our non-employee directors received annual base retainers in the amounts set forth below.

  							
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Base Retainer
	  
	Board of Directors Chair
	  
	$
	75,000
	  

	  
	  
	Other directors
	  
	$
	45,000
	  

	Committee Chair Retainer
	  
	Audit Committee
	  
	$
	20,000
	  

	  
	  
	Compliance Committee
	  
	$
	15,000
	  

	  
	  
	Compensation and Talent Committee
	  
	$
	15,000
	  

	  
	  
	Nominating and Governance Committee
	  
	$
	10,000
	  

	  
	  
	Science and Technology Committee
	  
	$
	25,000
	  

	Committee Member Retainer
	  
	Audit Committee
	  
	$
	10,000
	  

	  
	  
	Compliance Committee
	  
	$
	7,500
	  

	  
	  
	Compensation and Talent Committee
	  
	$
	7,500
	  

	  
	  
	Nominating and Governance Committee
	  
	$
	5,000
	  

	  
	  
	Science and Technology Committee
	  
	$
	7,500
	  



    

  We also reimburse our non-employee directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with service on our Board of Directors.

  Election to Receive Retainers in Cash or Equity

  Each non-employee director may make an annual election to receive his or her annual base retainer (but not committee retainers) either wholly in cash or to receive either 50% or 100% of that retainer in fully vested shares of Common Stock under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (“2004 EIP”) of equal value. Non-employee directors electing to receive 50% or 100% of their annual base retainer in fully vested Common Stock will receive such shares on the first business day of each calendar quarter for which the election is in effect.

  Initial and Annual Equity Grants to Non-Employee Directors

  Non-employee directors receive grants of stock awards under the 2004 EIP. Non-employee directors receive an initial option grant of 35,000 shares on joining the Board of Directors. Continuing directors receive an annual option grant of 10,000 shares and an annual restricted stock unit (“RSU”) grant 5,000 shares. Generally, an initial option grant to a director vests monthly over three years. The annual option grants to continuing directors vest monthly over one year, and the annual RSU grants to continuing directors are subject to 100% cliff vesting on the one-year anniversary of the RSU grant. Our Board of Directors continues to have discretion to grant options to new and continuing non-employee directors. A non-employee director that resigns from the Board of Directors has one year following resignation to exercise vested options, but such one-year period may be extended at the discretion of the Compensation and Talent Committee.
#### § 241.1040 Eligible lenders.

Lenders approved as mortgagees under §§ 202.6, 202.7 or 202.9 of this chapter are eligible for insurance of equity loans under this subpart.

[62 FR 20088, Apr. 24, 1997]
#### Carroll *v.*Cook Brewing Company; and *vice versa.*

August 16, 1912.

Attachment. Before Jnclge Bell. Fnlton superior court.' 22, 1911.

Atkinson, J.

On April 16th, 1910, the E. W. Cook Brewing Company, a corporation, instituted suit in attachment against E. H. Carroll. The defendant answered, and among other 'things set up a cross-demand for damages as from breach of contract, and alsd as from tort, on the ground , that in August, 1909, the plaintiff maliciously and without probable cause filed a petition in bankruptcy' in the United States court against the defendant, which remained pending until April 18th, 1910, when it was tried and a verdict returned finding that defendant was not insolvent at the date the proceedings were instituted, the result of the filing and pendency of such proceedings being to injure defendant’s credit and commercial standing and by reason thereof destroy his business. A motion was made to strike so much of the answer as set up the cross-action, but it was overruled, and the plaintiff excepted pendente lite. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by both sides at the trial, the judge held that a recovery by the defendant for any amount on his cross-demand was not authorized, and as to such demand entered an order in the nature of a nonsuit. Then, on motion, a verdict was directed in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of its demand. The defendant *by*direct bill of exceptions assigned error upon each of the rulings just stated. The plaintiff by cross-bill of exceptions assigned error upon the ruling excepted to pendente lite. The only assignment of error insisted upon in the briefs of counsel for plaintiff in error is that which refers to the ruling with reference to the defendant’s cross-demand. *Held:*

1. Assignments of error which are not insisted upon in the briefs of counsel for plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned.

2. The evidence was insufficient to authorize a recovery by the defendant on his cross-demand.

3. The judgment on the main bill of exceptions being *affirmed,*the cross-bill of exceptions will be *dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*536
      *Walter B. Brown*and *McDaniel & Black,*for plaintiff in error.

*Shepard Bryan*and *J. D. Kilpatrick,*contra.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2440 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Baypure DS. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Baypure DS. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYPURE DS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 Polyaspartic Acid, Sodium 

Salt, in Aqueous Solution 

(CAS No. 181828–06–8) 

(provided for in subheading 

3911.90.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2440 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of John K. Vreeland, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Elaine Vreeland, an Infant, Respondent, v. Auburn Board of Education, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Cayuga Special Term granting leave to serve late notice of claim.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****FY ... research and developmentaccomplishments [electronic resource].
 
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
 
SuDoc Number:TD 4.87/2-6:
Item Number:0431-C-76 (online)
CGP System Number:000610028
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 3, 2017********
### **CHAPTER 38—CRUDE OIL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS**

Sec.
2001.
Findings.
2002.
Statement of purposes.
2003.
Definitions.
2004.
Applications for approval of proposed crude oil transportation systems.
2005.
Review schedule.
2006.
Environmental impact statements.
2007.
Decision of President.
2008.
Procedures for waiver of Federal law.
2009.
Expedited procedures for issuance of permits: enforcement of rights-of-way.
2010.
Negotiations with Government of Canada.
2011.
Judicial review.
2012.
Authorization for appropriation.
§ 27.15 Notice of default and foreclosure sale. ( a ) Within 45 days after accepting his or her designation to act as commissioner, the commissioner shall commence the foreclosure by serving a Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale.
( b ) The Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale shall contain the following information: ( 1 ) The Notice shall state that all deposits and the balance of the purchase price shall be paid by certified or cashier's check. The Notice shall state that no deposit will be required of the Secretary when the Secretary bids at the foreclosure sale.
( 2 ) Any terms and conditions to which the purchaser at the foreclosure sale must agree under § 27.20. The Notice need not describe at length each and every pertinent term and condition, including any required use agreements and deed covenants, if it describes these terms and conditions in a general way and if it states that the precise terms will be available from the commissioner upon request.
( c ) The Notice need not be mailed to mortgagors who have been released from all obligations under the mortgage.
( d ) In deciding which newspaper or newspapers to select as general circulation newspapers for purposes of publication of the required notice, the commissioner need not select the newspaper with the largest circulation.
( e ) In addition to Notice posting requirements included in the Act, the Notice shall also be posted in the project office and in such other appropriate conspicuous places as the commissioner deems appropriate for providing notice to all tenants. Posting shall not be required if the commissioner in his or her discretion finds that the act of posting is likely to lead to a breach of the peace or may result in the increased risk of vandalism or damage to the property. Any such finding will be made in writing. Entry on the premises by the commissioner for the purpose of posting shall be privileged as against all other persons.
( f ) When service of the Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale is made by mail, the commissioner shall at the same time and in the same manner serve a copy of the instrument by which the General Counsel, under § 27.10(b), has designated him or her to act as commissioner.
( g ) At least 7 days before the foreclosure sale, the commissioner will record both the instrument designating him or her to act as commissioner and the Notice of Default and Foreclosure Sale in the same office or offices in which the mortgage was recorded.
EX-10.3






EXHIBIT 10.3




EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION




2002 Stock Incentive Plan



On January 25, 2006, the Compensation Committee granted the below listed number of stock options
and restricted stock to the following executive officers of the Company:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Stock Options	 	Restricted Stock
	Bobby S. Shackouls
	 	 	85,000	 	 	 	20,000	 
	Randy L. Limbacher
	 	 	30,000	 	 	 	8,500	 
	Steven J. Shapiro
	 	 	30,000	 	 	 	8,500	 
	L. David Hanower
	 	 	20,000	 	 	 	6,500	 
	John A. Williams
	 	 	20,000	 	 	 	6,500	 
	Mark E. Ellis
	 	 	17,000	 	 	 	4,500	 
	Joseph P.McCoy
	 	 	17,000	 	 	 	4,500	 






Incentive Compensation Plan



On January 25, 2006, the Compensation Committee approved awards under the Incentive Compensation
Plan to the following executive officers of the Company as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Bobby S. Shackouls
	 	$	1,601,563	 
	Randy L. Limbacher
	 	$	859,375	 
	Steven J. Shapiro
	 	$	859,375	 






L. David Hanower $562,500



	 	 	 	 	 
	John A. Williams
	 	$	500,025	 
	Mark E. Ellis
	 	$	330,000	 
	Joseph P. McCoy
	 	$	326,666	 






2005 Performance Share Unit Plan



On January 25, 2006, the Compensation Committee vested the below listed number of performance share
units previously granted to the following officers of the Company resulting in the below listed
payouts:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Executive Officer	 	Number of Units Vested	 	Payout
	Bobby S. Shackouls
	 	 	50,000	 	 	$	4,141,050	 
	Randy L. Limbacher
	 	 	17,500	 	 	$	1,449,368	 
	Steven J. Shapiro
	 	 	17,500	 	 	$	1,449,368	 
	L. David Hanower
	 	 	13,750	 	 	$	1,138,789	 
	John A. Williams
	 	 	13,750	 	 	$	1,138,789	 
	Mark E. Ellis
	 	 	10,000	 	 	$	828,210	 
	Joseph P. McCoy
	 	 	10,000	 	 	$	828,210