alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Head, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W912BV-10-C-2001 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60483

Robert G. Ruggieri, Esq. Michael H. Payne, Esq.

Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall

& Furman PC Philadelphia, PA Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Keith S. Francis, Esq. Bryan M. Harrington, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S_. Army Engineer District, Tulsa OPINION BYADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SWEET It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature ofa consentjudgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of$412,804.00. This amount is inclusive ofinterest. No further interest shall be paid. Dated: 26 June 2017

(Signatures continued) JAMES R. SWEET Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I concur

OWEN C. WILSON Administrative Judge Acting Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Opinion and Decision ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 60483, Appeal ofHead, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
exhibit1036.htm


Exhibit 10.36


 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 







Party A: (Lender)   Shandong Longkong Travel Development Co., Ltd


 



Party B: (Borrower) Yishui Underground Fluorescent Lake Travel Development Co., Ltd


 









To relieve the financial strain, Party A agrees to provide a Loan to Party B; the loan fund shall be used by Party B for business operating; through consultations, Both Parties agree to sign the contract:


 


Article 1: Description of the loan


 



1.  The loan term shall be one year starting from 26-4-2010 to 25-4-2011.


 





2.  The loan lending interest rate shall be a monthly rate of 0.8%.


 





3.  The loan shall be used for working capital, Party B shall not change the purpose of the loan.


 





4.  The loan Amount is RMB1, 000, 000.00 Yuan; in words: RMB One Million Yuan.


 




Article 2: Commitments


 



1.  The loan is due, Party B commits to repay up. Party B fails to repay the Loan including the principal and interest, Party A may go to laws to recover the loan.


 





2. The loan is being due, the loan term may be extended by both parties through consultations.


 




Article 3: The contract is made out in 2 duplicates, each for both parties.


 


It shall become effective as signed by both parties.












Party A: (Lender)       Shandong Longkong Travel development Co., Ltd (sealed) [company chop]


 


Party B: (Borrower)   Yishui Underground Fluorescent Lake Travel Development Co., Ltd (sealed) [company chop]












Date:                           24-4-2010
#### § 266.636 Insuring new loans for defaulted projects.

The HFA may not make another loan that is insured under this part to the same owner in the same project if HUD has paid a claim under this part.
#### § 266.417 Authority to adjust mortgage insurance amount.

In order to protect the mortgage insurance funds, the Commissioner has authority in his or her sole discretion, at any time prior to and including final endorsement, to adjust the amount of the mortgage insurance.
#### § 92.84 Legal process defined.

Legal process means a writ, warrant, mandate, or other process issuing from a court of justice. The term includes subpoenas, citations, and complaints.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

§ 40.11 Medical grounds of ineligibility. ( a ) *Decision on eligibility based on findings of medical doctor.* A finding of a panel physician designated by the post in whose jurisdiction the examination is performed pursuant to INA 212(a)(1) shall be binding on the consular officer, except that the officer may refer a panel physician finding in an individual case to USPHS for review.
( b ) *Waiver of ineligibility—INA 212(g).* If an immigrant visa applicant is inadmissible under INA 212(a)(1)(A)(i), (ii), or (iii) but is qualified to seek the benefits of INA 212(g)(1)(A) or (B), 212(g)(2)(C), or 212(g)(3), the consular officer shall inform the alien of the procedure for applying to DHS for relief under the applicable provision of law. A visa may not be issued to the alien until the consular officer has received notification from DHS of the approval of the alien's application under INA 212(g), unless the consular officer has been delegated authority by the Secretary of Homeland Security to grant the particular waiver under INA 212(g).
( c ) *Waiver authority—INA 212(g)(2)(A) and (B).* The consular officer may waive section 212(a)(1)(A)(ii) visa ineligibility if the alien qualifies for such waiver under the provisions of INA 212(g)(2)(A) or (B).
[56 FR 30422, July 2, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 67567, Dec. 29, 1997]
### §§270–1 to 270–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–203, §18(a), Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 710

Section 270–1, acts May 17, 1906, ch. 2469, §1, 34 Stat. 197; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 891, §1(a)–(d), 70 Stat. 954, authorized making of homestead allotments to native Indians, Aleuts, or Eskimos and provided for conveyance of allotted lands. Section was formerly classified to section 357 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.

Section 270–2, act May 17, 1906, ch. 2469, §2, as added Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 891, §1(e), 70 Stat. 954, permitted allotments of land in national forests if land was certified as chiefly valuable for agricultural or grazing uses. Section was formerly classified to section 357a of Title 48.

Section 270–3, act May 27, 1906, ch. 2469, §3, as added Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 891, §1(e), 70 Stat. 954, prohibited making of an allotment unless person made satisfactory proof of substantially continuous use and occupancy of land for five years. Section was formerly classified to section 357b of Title 48.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2894 Engrossed in House (EH)]

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2894

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, as the ``Abraham 
               Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2894

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, as the ``Abraham 
               Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 102 
South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1451
GLEN BOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL HOLLAND, Trustee, 1974 Pension Plan, UMWA; MARTY HUDSON, T rustee, 1974 Pension Plan, UMWA; ELLIOTT SEGAL, Trustee, 1974 Pension Plan, UMWA; PAUL R. DEAN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-264-B) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Glen Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Glenda Sullivan Finch, Matilda Ann Brodnax, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his action challenging the final decision of the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America denying his claim for pension benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. Holland , No. CA-94-264-B (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 236.7 Fiscal Agent obligations.

Failure of the Fiscal Agent to perform any of its obligations pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall not impair any Noteholder's rights under the Guarantee, but may be the subject of action for damages against the Fiscal Agent by USAID as a result of such failure or neglect. A Noteholder may appoint the Fiscal Agent to make demand for payment on its behalf under the Guarantee.
§ 51.56 Expedited passport processing. ( a ) Within the United States, an applicant for passport service (including issuance or replacement of a passport) may request expedited processing. The Department may decline the request.
( b ) Expedited passport processing shall mean completing processing within the number of business days published on the Department's Web site, *http://www.travel.state.gov ,* commencing when the application reaches a Passport Agency or, if the application is already with a Passport Agency, commencing when the request for expedited processing is approved. The processing will be considered completed when the passport is ready to be picked up by the applicant or is mailed to the applicant, or a letter of passport denial is transmitted to the applicant.
( c ) A fee is charged for expedited passport processing (see 22 CFR 51.51(c)). The fee does not cover any costs of mailing above the normal level of service regularly provided by the Department. The cost of expedited mailing must be paid by the applicant.
( d ) The Department will not charge the fee for expedited passport processing if the Department's error, mistake or delay caused the need for expedited processing.
[72 FR 64931, Nov. 19, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 47727, Sept. 17, 2009; 80 FR 72592, Nov. 20, 2015]
#### Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, v. Rodney Smith, Respondent-Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts by increasing the amount of the award to plaintiff to $289.21 and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Certain findings of fact disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The extraordinary expenses should not have -been depreciated in the computation of damages. (Cross appeals from judgment of Oneida Trial Term for plaintiff, in an action for negligent damage to a utility pole. Liability was conceded and only the question of damages was litigated.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpem and Henry, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.1
                                                                           ----


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unifrax Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, such to officers' knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date:  08/13/03                 By: /s/ William P. Kelly
     --------------             ----------------------------------------------
                                         William P. Kelly
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer



                                By: /s/ Mark D. Roos
                                ----------------------------------------------
                                        Mark D. Roos
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Unifrax Corporation and will be retained by Unifrax Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                       25
#### § 248.261 Agreements implementing plans of action and State strategies.

The Commissioner is authorized to enter into agreements, including those for the provision of incentives, necessary to implement any plan of action or State strategy approved by the Commissioner under this part.
### §6733. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1131(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 725

Section, Pub. L. 94–369, title II, §213, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 1009, related to reports to Congress by Secretary of the Treasury.
#### In the Matter of Odessa Cherry, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to file a late notice of claim against the City of New York and the New York City Housing Authority, the authority appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 16, 1977, as granted the application as against it. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our view the Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion to file a late notice of claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
§ 291.530 Eligible firefighter/emergency medical technicians. A person qualifies as a firefighter/emergency medical technician for the purposes of the GNND Sales Program if the person is: ( a ) Employed full-time as a firefighter or emergency medical technician by a fire department or emergency medical services responder unit of the Federal Government, a State, unit of general local government, or an Indian tribal government; and
( b ) The full-time employment in paragraph (a) of this section must, in the normal course of business, directly serve the locality where the home is located.
[81 FR 53003, Aug. 11, 2016]
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 9:06 AM

To: 'brian.j.godsen@delphi.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information

Dear Mr. Godsen: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0788). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your 

petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any 

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov. 

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the proposed UAS operation. The description should include 

the following: size and maximum weight (include payload) and whether the aircraft is fixed wing or 

rotorcraft. 

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed. 

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum. This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual. 

 Describe the proximity of the proposed operations to airports and populated areas. 

 Your petition references a maintenance inspection. Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is 

airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS. 

Please provide the additional information by December 22, 2014. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
### §411b. Employment of engineers, geologists, appraisers and economists for reclamation consultation work; compensation; retired Army and Navy officers as consulting engineers

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his judgment and discretion, to employ for consultation purposes on important reclamation work ten consulting engineers, geologists, appraisers, and economists, at rates of compensation to be fixed by him, but not to exceed $50 per day for any engineer, geologist, appraiser, or economist so employed: Provided, That the total compensation paid to any engineer, geologist, appraiser, or economist during any fiscal year shall not exceed $5,000: Provided further, That notwithstanding the provisions of any other Act, retired officers of the Army or Navy may be employed by the Secretary of the Interior as consulting engineers in accordance with the provisions of this section.

(Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 374, §1, 45 Stat. 1406; Apr. 22, 1940, ch. 125, 54 Stat. 148; Dec. 23, 1944, ch. 708, 58 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 652.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–554 struck out provisions which authorized employment of retired personnel of the Department of the Interior as consultants.

1944—Act Dec. 23, 1944, inserted third proviso.

1940—Act Apr. 22, 1940, provided for employment of appraisers and increased the number to be employed from five to ten.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
#### Maydole Hammer Corporation v. Lawrence Warehouse Company.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before December 22, I960, with notice of argument for the Non-Enumerated Calendar for the first day of the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2679 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2679

  To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the 
    chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of 
religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that 
       potential litigants may seek damages and attorney's fees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mr. Hostettler (for himself, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Jenkins, Mr. 
Paul, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Sodrel, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Alexander, 
  Mr. Bachus, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Otter, Mr. 
Duncan, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Smith of Texas, 
 Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Poe, and Mr. Barrett of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the 
    chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of 
religion by State and local officials that results from the threat that 
       potential litigants may seek damages and attorney's fees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Expression of Religion Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON CERTAIN LAWSUITS AGAINST STATE AND LOCAL 
              OFFICIALS.

    (a) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.--Section 1979 of the 
Revised Statutes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before the first sentence; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) The remedies with respect to a claim under this section where 
the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the 
Constitution against the establishment of religion shall be limited to 
injunctive relief.''.
    (b) Attorneys Fees.--Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes of the 
United States (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following: ``However, no fees shall be awarded under this subsection 
with respect to a claim described in subsection (b) of section nineteen 
hundred and seventy nine.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1003.607 Lead-based paint.

The requirements of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851-4856), and implementing regulations part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of this title apply to activities conducted under this program.

[64 FR 50230, Sept. 15, 1999]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2894

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Abraham 

Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky (for himself, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. CHANDLER, Mrs. NORTHUP, and Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Government Reform 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, 

Kentucky, as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ABRAHAM LINCOLN BIRTHPLACE POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 102 South Walters Avenue in 
2

•HR 2894 IH 

1 Hodgenville, Kentucky, shall be known and designated as 

2 the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln 

7 Birthplace Post Office Building’’.

Æ