alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Stipulation to Briefing 

C 08-5408 SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Scott J. Yundt (CSB #242595) 

TRI-VALLEY CARES 

2582 Old First Street 

Livermore, California 94550 

Telephone: (925) 443-7148 

Facsimile: (925) 443-0177 

Email: scott@trivalleycares.org 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TRI-VALLEY CARES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES NATIONAL NUCLEAR 

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, an agency 

of the U.S. Department of Energy, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 08-5408-SC 

STIPULATION TO BRIEFING; and 

[Proposed] ORDER 

Date: November 19, 2010 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Plaintiff, Tri-Valley Cares, and defendants, the United States Department of Energy 

(“DOE”), and the National Nuclear Security Administration (“NNSA”), by and through their 

counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following: 

1. On April 20, 2010, the Court set a supplemental briefing schedule for the parties in 

which the initial round of summary judgment briefing was set to begin on July 15, 2010. 

2. The parties have been engaged in settlement discussions and have narrowed the areas of 

contention to the issue of attorney’s fees. 

3. The parties seek a 30-day period to attempt to settle this matter, and respectfully request 

that the Court move the current briefing schedule and hearing date forward accordingly. 

 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment: August 16, 2010 

Case 3:08-cv-05408-SC Document 26 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation to Briefing 

C 08-5408 SC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants’ Cross-Motion and Opposition: September 15, 2010 

Plaintiff’s Cross-Opposition and Reply: October 15, 2010 

Defendants’ Reply: November 5, 2010 

Hearing: November 19, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

Dated: July 13, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

 United States Attorney 

 /s/______________ ILA C. DEISS 

 Assistant United States Attorney 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 ISAAC CAMPBELL 

 Trial Attorney 

 United States Department of Justice 

Dated: July 14, 2010 /s/________________ SCOTT J. YUNDT 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

ORDER

 Pursuant to the stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: _____________________________ 

 SAMUEL CONTI 

 United States District Judge 

7/19/10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:08-cv-05408-SC Document 26 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
10.24

     

    AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO EXCLUSIVE AGENCY AGREEMENT DATED

     

    MARCH
17, 2008

     

    Xinhua
Surgical Instruments Co., Ltd. (“Party A” or “Xinhua”) and Bio-Bridge Science,
Inc. (“Bio-Bridge” or “ Party B”) hereby at March 10, 2009 enter into the
following amendment to the Exclusive Agency Agreement (“the Agreement”) dated
March 17, 2008 to replace Section 5 of the Agreement.

     

    5.
Minimum turnover per annum

     

    Party B
shall undertake to place orders with Party A, for the above commodity, for not
less than USD 55,000 in the first year calculated from the signing date.
Annually, from the second year, the minimum order placement shall be
progressively increased with 10 percent of the previous year’s minimum order
placement.

     

    This
Amendment is in two originals with each Party holding one copy.

     

    Party A:
Xinhua Surgical Instruments Co., Ltd.

     

    /s/ Wang
Yuquan

     

    Wang
Yuquan

     

    General
Manager

     

    Party B:
Bio-Bridge Science, Inc.

     

    /s/ Liang
Qiao

     

    Liang
Qiao, M.D.

     

    Chief
Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER III—DEPOSITS AND FORFEITURES
§ 518.11 Pre-award policies. ( a ) Use of Grants and Cooperative Agreements, and Contracts. In each instance, the Federal awarding agency shall decide on the appropriate award instrument (i.e., grant, cooperative agreement, or contract). The Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act (31 U.S.C. 6301-08) governs the use of grants, cooperative agreements and contracts. A grant or cooperative agreement shall be used only when the principal purpose of a transaction is to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by Federal statute. The statutory criterion for choosing between grants and cooperative agreements is that for the latter, “substantial involvement is expected between the executive agency and the State, local government, or other recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated in the agreement.” Contracts shall be used when the principal purpose is acquisition of property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Federal Government.
( b ) Public Notice and Priority Setting. Federal awarding agencies shall notify the public of its intended funding priorities for discretionary grant programs, unless funding priorities are established by Federal statute.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         458,722
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,945,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                   17,500
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         298,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,044,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,673,095
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    631,757
<COMMON>                                       1,484,740
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,006,696
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               450,163
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               17,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             32,288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                220,992
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            226,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (5,024)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   220,992
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .047
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .047


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND P. MARIOLLE

Plaintiff,

 v.

VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants. ___________________________________

REGINA LYNN MARIOLLE

Plaintiff,

 v.

VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

et al.,

Defendants /

No. C-09-1209 MMC

No. C-09-4250 MMC

ORDER STRIKING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE DOE 1 AMENDMENT AND

DOE 2 AMENDMENT FILED IN CIVIL

CASE NO. 09-1209 

By order filed May 11, 2010, the Court approved the parties’ stipulation to, inter alia,

afford each plaintiff leave to amend his or her respective pleading, and set a deadline of

May 21, 2010 for each plaintiff to file any such amended pleading.

On May 14, 2010, plaintiff Raymond P. Mariolle filed two documents, one such filing

titled “Doe 1 Amendment to Complaint for Personal Injuries and Damages,” by which he

Case 3:09-cv-01209-MMC Document 46 Filed 05/19/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

To date, Regina Lynn Mariolle has not taken any steps to amend her First Amended

Complaint.

2

purports to amend his complaint to substitute Wittke Waste Equipment in place of “Doe 1,”

and the other titled “Doe 2 Amendment to Complaint for Personal Injuries and Damages,”

by which he purports to amend his complaint to substitute Labrie Environmental Group in

place of “Doe 2.”1

In federal court, “[a]s a general rule, the use of ‘John Doe’ to identify a defendant is

not favored.” See Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F. 2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980). Even where a

defendant is identified as a “Doe,” when the plaintiff thereafter seeks to substitute a named

defendant, the preferred practice is the filing of an amended complaint adding the new

defendant and deleting the “Doe” defendant. See, e.g., Lindley v. General Elec. Co., 780

F. 2d 797, 801-02 (9th Cir.) (holding plaintiff properly substituted named defendant for

“Doe” defendant where plaintiff filed amended complaint adding named defendant and

eliminating “Doe” as party), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1186 (1986). In accordance therewith,

the Court’s May 11, 2010 Order provides for the filing of an “amended complaint.” (See

Order, filed May 11, 2010, at 3.) Plaintiff Raymond P. Mariolle, however, has attempted to

add new parties by the unauthorized means of filing an “amendment to” his complaint.

Accordingly, “Doe 1 Amendment to Complaint for Personal Injuries and Damages”

and “Doe 2 Amendment to Complaint for Personal Injuries and Damages” are hereby

STRICKEN, without prejudice to Raymond P. Mariolle’s filing a First Amended Complaint

no later than May 21, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 19, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01209-MMC Document 46 Filed 05/19/10 Page 2 of 2
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04575**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04575\04575_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04575\04575_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04575\04575_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04575\04575_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04575\Certification Statement Plant ID 04575.pdf Plant certification statement x 04575\Supplemental Documents\04575_GV_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04575\Supplemental Documents\04575_GV_A5-3_Water Flow Balance Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04575\04575_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04575\04575_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 4.3



 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated November 4, 2022, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 590 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-266864) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 4, 2022
#### Cora T. Walker et al., Appellants, v. Trans-City Realty Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Orders entered on November 22, 1961 unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
§ 3.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
#### Barbara Kam, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Leah Kam, et al., Appellants, v. Morton Blank, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Motion by respondent Blank for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division from an order entered April 11, 1960, denying a motion for resettlement. Motion denied, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta and Christ, JJ., concur; Pette, J., not voting.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Vermontfiscal year ... annual report [electronic resource].
 
2000 | 2002
 
SuDoc Number:A 114.2:V 59
Item Number:0034-A-01 (online)
CGP System Number:000609003
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 7, 2017********
§ 242.61 Management. The mortgagor shall provide for management of the hospital in a manner satisfactory to HUD. ( a ) *Contract Management of Hospital.* The mortgagor shall not execute a management agreement or any other contract for management of the hospital without HUD's prior written approval. (Management of the hospital, which requires HUD's prior written approval, refers to management of the hospital not management of components within the hospital such as the hospital cafeteria or hospital pharmacy.) Any management agreement or contract for management of the hospital shall contain a provision that it shall be subject to termination without penalty and with or without cause, upon written request by HUD addressed to the mortgagor and management agent.
( b ) *Principals.* HUD shall have the authority to require that any principals of the mortgagor, including but not limited to board members of a corporate entity, be removed, substituted, or terminated for cause upon written request by HUD addressed to the mortgagor.
( c ) *Employees.* HUD shall have the authority to require that any key management employees of the mortgagor (as defined and determined solely by HUD) be terminated for cause upon written request by HUD addressed to the mortgagor.
( d ) *Procedures upon receipt of request under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section.* Upon receipt of such requests under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, the mortgagor shall immediately terminate said management agreement, principals, or employees within the shortest applicable period HUD determines appropriate and shall make arrangements satisfactory to HUD for ongoing proper management of the hospital.
[72 FR 67546, Nov. 28, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 35923, June 25, 2008]
Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 99 Filed 04/23/10 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between George Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, and Matt Jaffe et al., Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 30, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Korn, J., at Special Term. The respondent shall recover of the appellants $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal (to include Appeal No. 2398 decided simultaneously with this appeal). Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
Case 3:09-cv-02051-WHA Document 20 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02051-WHA Document19 Filed04/09/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-02051-WHA Document 20 Filed 04/12/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-02051-WHA Document19 Filed04/09/10 Page2 of 3
Case3:09-cv-02051-WHA Document19 Filed04/09/10 Page3 of 3

April 12, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-02051-WHA Document 20 Filed 04/12/10 Page 3 of 3
§ 27.100 Purpose, scope and applicability. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this subpart is to implement requirements for the administration of the Single Family Mortgage Foreclosure Act of 1994 (the Statute), 12 U.S.C. 3751-3768, that clarify, or are in addition to, the requirements contained in the Statute, which are not republished here and must be consulted in conjunction with the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) *Scope.* The Secretary may foreclose on any defaulted single family mortgage described in the Statute regardless of when the mortgage was executed.
( c ) *Applicability.* The Secretary may, at the Secretary's option, use other procedures to foreclose defaulted single family mortgages, including judicial foreclosure in State or Federal Court, and nonjudicial foreclosures under State law or any other Federal law. This subpart applies only to foreclosure procedures authorized by the Statute and not to any other foreclosure procedures the Secretary may use.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2659

To provide grants to States to improve sex offender registries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005

Mr. BOSWELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To provide grants to States to improve sex offender 

registries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Children Safe 

5 Communities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS AUTHORIZED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—From amounts made available to 

8 carry out this section, the Attorney General shall make 

9 grants to States to be used by each State to implement 

10 better and more comprehensive sex offender registries and 

11 tracking systems. 
2

•HR 2659 IH 

1 (b) AMOUNTS BASED ON POPULATION.—For each 

2 State, the amount granted to that State shall be deter3 mined based on the population of that State. 

4 (c) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

5 ‘‘State’’ includes the District of Columbia, the Common6 wealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the 

7 United States Virgin Islands, and any other territory or 

8 possession of the United States. 

9 (d) SET-ASIDE FOR COORDINATION.—Of the 

10 amounts made available to carry out this section, the At11 torney General may use not more than 2 percent to pro12 vide assistance to States in coordinating the activities car13 ried out under this section. 

14 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

15 are authorized to be appropriated for grants under this 

16 section $300,000,000 for fiscal year 2006 and such sums 

17 as may be necessary for each fiscal year thereafter.

Æ
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2917 

To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of Thiamethoxam, 

Difenoconazole, Fludioxinil, and Mefenoxam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on formulations of 

Thiamethoxam, Difenoconazole, Fludioxinil, and Mefenoxam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF THIAMETHOXAM, 

4 DIFENOCONAZOLE, FLUDIOXINIL, AND 

5 MEFENOXAM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 
2 

•HR 2917 IH 

‘‘ 9902.07.44 Formulations of 

Thiamethoxam, 

Difenoconazole, Fludioxinil 

and Mefenoxam which contain: Thiamethoxam Technical 3-[(2-chloro-5- 

thiazolyl)methyl]tetrahydro5-methyl-N-nitro- 1,3,5- 

oxadiazin-4-imine), 

Difenoconazole Technical 

1H-1,2,4-triazole, 1-[[2-[2- 

chloro-4-(4- 

chlorophenoxy)phenyl]-4- 

methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2- 

yl]methyl]- Fludioxinil Technical 1H-Pyrrole-3- 

carbonitrile, 4-(2,2-difluoro1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl)- 

Mefenoxam Technical (R,S)– 

2-[(2,6-dimethylphenyl]- 

methoxyacetylamino]-propionic acid methyl ester (CAS 

Nos. 153719–23–4, 119446– 

68–3, 131341–86–1, 70630– 

17–0, and 69516–34–3) 

(provided for in subheading 

3808.20.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §2408. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2007 through 2016, to remain available until expended.

#### (b) Rural water programs assessment

Of the amounts made available under subsection (a), not more than $1,000,000 may be made available to carry out section 2403 of this title for each of fiscal years 2007 and 2008.

#### (c) Construction costs

No amounts made available under this section shall be used to pay construction costs associated with any rural water supply project.

(Pub. L. 109–451, title I, §109, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3356.)
Exhibit
32(a)





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Bruce
J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.








November
      10, 2009  /s/Bruce
      J. Haber
              Bruce
      J. Haber

                Chief
      Executive Officer
### **CHAPTER 3—SURVEYS**

Sec.
51.
Omitted.
52.
Surveying duties.
53.
Powers devolved on Secretary of the Interior on turning over of papers to States.
54.
Completion of surveys; delivery to States.
55.
Field notes delivered to States; access to.
56.
Conditions of delivery to States.
57.
Authenticated copies or extracts from records as evidence.
58.
Transcripts from records of Louisiana.
59.
Official papers in office of surveyor general in California; copies.
60.
Stationery for mineral surveys.
61 to 63.
Repealed.