alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.936 Supplementary specific procedural requirements under HUD building products certification program for solid fuel type room heaters and fireplace stoves. ( a ) *Applicable standards.* Solid fuel type room heaters and fireplace stoves certified under the HUD Building Products Certification Program shall be designed, assembled and tested in conformance with the following standards, which are incorporated by reference: ( 1 ) ANSI/UL 737 (1978), for fireplace stoves;
( 2 ) ANSI/UL 1482 (1979), for solid fuel type room heaters with coal amendments.
( b ) *Labelling.* ( 1 ) Under the procedures set forth in paragraph (d)(6) of § 200.935, concerning labelling of a product, the administrator's validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. In the case of solid fuel type room heaters and fireplace stoves, the following additional information must be included on the certification label: ( i ) The manufacturer's statement of conformance to the HUD Building Products Certification Program;
( ii ) The manufacturer's name and the identity and location of manufacturing plant;
( iii ) The specification designation and manufacturer series or model number; and
( iv ) The type of fuel to be used.
( 2 ) The certification label must be permanently affixed to the heater or stove and be readily visible after the heater or stove is installed.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality control inspections.* Under the procedures set forth in paragraph (d)(8) of § 200.935, concerning periodic tests and quality control inspections, the frequency of testing for a product must be described in the specific building product certification program. In the case of solid fuel type room heaters and fireplace stoves, testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) Once every four years, beginning with the initial administrator visit, a sample of each certified product shall be selected by the administrator for testing for compliance with the applicable standards in a laboratory which has been accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
( 2 ) The administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility two times a year to assure that the initially accepted quality control procedures are being followed.
[48 FR 1955, Jan. 17, 1983]
D:\netsite-docs\lps89639\vernalfmpea.pdf
### §9202. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "wind energy system" means a system of components which converts the kinetic energy of the wind into electricity or mechanical power, and which comprises all necessary components, including energy storage, power conditioning, control systems, and transmission systems, where appropriate, to provide electricity or mechanical power for individual, residential, agricultural, commercial, industrial, utility, or governmental use;

(2) the term "small wind energy system" means a wind energy system having a maximum rated capacity of one hundred kilowatts or less;

(3) the term "large wind energy system" means a wind energy system which is not a small wind energy system;

(4) the term "public and private entity" means any individual, corporation, partnership, firm, association, agricultural cooperative, public- or investor-owned utility, public or private institution or group, any State or local government agency, or any other domestic entity;

(5) the term "known wind resource" means a site with an estimated average annual wind velocity of at least twelve miles per hour;

(6) the term "conventional energy source" means energy produced from oil, gas, coal, and nuclear fuels; and

(7) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy.

(Pub. L. 96–345, §3, Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1140.)
§ 291.304 Bidding process. ( a ) *Submission of bids.* All bids must be submitted to HUD in accordance with instructions in the bid package for a particular sale.
( b ) *Effect of bid.* By submitting a bid, the bidder is making an offer to purchase single family mortgage loans as presented in the bid package. Submission of a bid constitutes acceptance of the terms and conditions set forth in the bid package. Along with the bid, the bidder must submit an executed copy of the Loan Sale Agreement, which is included in the bid package.
( c ) *Earnest money deposits.* The bidder must submit to HUD, along with its bid, an earnest money deposit in an amount to be determined by HUD. The earnest money deposit is nonrefundable to the winning bidder and will be credited toward the purchase price.
( d ) *Termination of offering.* HUD reserves the right to terminate an offering in whole or in part at any time before the bid date.
( e ) *Withdrawal of loans.* HUD reserves the right, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, to withdraw loan assets from a pool prior to the bid date. Any earnest money deposits relating to withdrawn loan assets will be retained by HUD and credited toward the total purchase price of the remaining loan assets in the pool, in accordance with the Loan Sale Agreement. After the bid date, HUD can withdraw mortgage loans in accordance with the Loan Sale Agreement.
( f ) *Rejection of bids.* ( 1 ) HUD may, in its sole discretion, reject any bid under the following circumstances: ( i ) If the bid does not conform with the instructions in the bid package; or
( ii ) If, in HUD's sole discretion, it determines that such action would be in the best interests of the U.S. Government.
( 2 ) HUD can also issue a conditional rejection that will become an acceptance upon fulfillment of HUD's requests.
( g ) *Withdrawal of bids.* A bidder may withdraw a previously submitted bid in accordance with the instructions in the bid package for a particular sale.
( h ) *Bids by brokers or agents.* Any bid by a broker or agent for a principal must be in the name of the principal and signed by the broker/agent as the attorney-in-fact for the principal. All such bid documents must be executed so as to bind the principal by the broker/agent as the attorney-in-fact. A power of attorney satisfactory to HUD as to form and content must be submitted with each bid.
### §7385s–1. Compensation to be provided

Subject to the other provisions of this part:

#### (1) Contractor employees

A covered DOE contractor employee shall receive contractor employee compensation under this part in accordance with section 7385s–2 of this title.

#### (2) Survivors

After the death of a covered DOE contractor employee, compensation referred to in paragraph (1) shall not be paid. Instead, the survivor of that employee shall receive compensation as follows:

(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the survivor of that employee shall receive contractor employee compensation under this part in accordance with section 7385s–3 of this title.

(B) In a case in which the employee's death occurred after the employee applied under this part and before compensation was paid under paragraph (1), and the employee's death occurred from a cause other than the covered illness of the employee, the survivor of that employee may elect to receive, in lieu of compensation under subparagraph (A), the amount of contractor employee compensation that the employee would have received in accordance with section 7385s–2 of this title if the employee's death had not occurred before compensation was paid under paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3672], as added Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3161, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2178.)
1

Hatcher v. County of Alameda, et al./Case #C09-01650 TEH 

[Proposed] Order Granting Individual Defendants’ Request To Be Excused From Appearing In 

Person Or By Telephone At April 26, 2010 Settlement Conference 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

Clyde A. Thompson, SBN 72920 

Benjamin A. Thompson, SBN 236590 

HAAPALA, THOMPSON & ABERN, LLP 

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Tel: 510-763-2324 

Fax: 510-273-8570 

Attorneys For Defendants 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHERIFF GREGORY J. AHERN, 

JEREMY C. LUCHA, JAMES A. RUSSELL, VICTOR GALINDO, 

VICTOR CABELLO, MATTHEW NEILL, and VICENTE CLEMENTE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 

BILLY J. HATCHER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, a governmental 

entity; GREGORY J. AHERN, in his capacity 

as Sheriff for COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; 

JEREMY C. LUCHA; JAMES A. RUSSELL; 

VICTOR GALINDO; VICTOR CABELLO; 

MATTHEW NEILL; and VICENTE 

CLEMENTE; individually and in their 

capacity as deputy sheriff’s for COUNTY OF 

ALAMEDA; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: C09-01650 TEH (MEJ) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST 

TO BE EXCUSED FROM APPEARING IN 

PERSON OR BY TELEPHONE AT 

APRIL 26, 2010 SETTLEMENT 

CONFERENCE

 Defendants GREGORY J. AHERN, JEREMY C. LUCHA, JAMES A. RUSSELL, 

VICTOR GALINDO, VICTOR CABELLO, MATTHEW NEILL, and VICENTE CLEMENTE 

have requested to be excused from personally attending the April 26, 2010 settlement 

conference, or from being available by telephone for the duration of the settlement conference. 

 Attending in their place will be a representative of defendant COUNTY OF 

ALAMEDA, who is authorized to settle the case. 

 Good cause appearing, 

 The request by defendants GREGORY J. AHERN, JEREMY C. LUCHA, JAMES A. 

RUSSELL, VICTOR GALINDO, VICTOR CABELLO, MATTHEW NEILL, and VICENTE 

Case 3:09-cv-01650-TEH Document 30 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Hatcher v. County of Alameda, et al./Case #C09-01650 TEH 

[Proposed] Order Granting Individual Defendants’ Request To Be Excused From Appearing In 

Person Or By Telephone At April 26, 2010 Settlement Conference 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Haapala, Thompson & Abern LLP Attorneys At Law 

Park Plaza Building 

1939 Harrison St., Suite 800 

Oakland, California 94612 

Telephone: 510-763-2324 

Facsimile: 510-273-8570

CLEMENTE to be excused from the conference is hereby granted. 

Dated:

 ________________________________________ 

 Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James 

April 13, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Maria-Elena James

Case 3:09-cv-01650-TEH Document 30 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Bregman Construction Corp., Respondent, v. Providence Granite Co., Inc., Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1232

In re: KALVIN MARSHALL,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 (3:13-cv-00286-JRS)

Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kalvin Marshall, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kalvin Marshall petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging 

that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil 

action. He seeks an order from this court directing the 

district court to act. Our review of the district court’s 

docket reveals that the district court recently entered a final 

order denying relief. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus 

petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
April 7, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FIRST TRANSIT, INC. AND HOLLIS SILMON, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00063-CV V.

HECTOR ALFARO, DAN TOLTECATL, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F OF 

D.I.T AND A/N/F D.T., AND DAVID CANTU, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Hector 

Alfaro, Dan Toltecatl, Individually and a/n/f of D.I.T and a/n/f D.T., and David 

Cantu, signed October 22, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of 

the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellants, First Transit, Inc. and Hollis Silmon, jointly and 

severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>       1

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            4,855
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    14,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                   1,351,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,447,440
<PP&E>                                        1,943,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                  754,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,665,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,854,179
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         500
<COMMON>                                            400
<OTHER-SE>                                    (189,523)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,665,556
<SALES>                                       4,319,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              4,319,189
<CGS>                                         4,869,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 4,869,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,105,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,105,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,105,143)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.28)



</TABLE>
#### § 291.10 General policy regarding rental of acquired property.

HUD will lease acquired property to comply with other designated HUD programs, or when the Secretary determines that it is in the interest of HUD. Leases may include an option to purchase in appropriate circumstances.
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification





I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2020-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.





/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp., Servicer to Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2020-AMarch 24, 2022
### §2009. Expedited procedures for issuance of permits: enforcement of rights-of-way

#### (a) Expedited procedures for approved systems

After issuance of a decision by the President approving any crude oil transportation system, all Federal officers and agencies shall expedite, to the maximum extent practicable, consistent with applicable provisions of law, all actions necessary to determine whether to issue, administer, or enforce rights-of-way across Federal lands and to issue Federal permits in connection with, or otherwise to authorize, construction and operation of such system. Any such action shall be consistent with applicable provisions of law. After taking any such action, such officer or agency shall publish notification of the taking of such action in the Federal Register.

#### (b) Expedited procedures for Long Beach-Midland project

All decisions regarding issuance of Federal permits, rights-of-way, and leases and other Federal authorizations necessary for construction and operation of the Long Beach-Midland project shall be consistent with applicable provisions of Federal law, except that such decisions shall be made within 30 days after the date this chapter becomes effective. The President may extend the date by which such decisions, under the preceding sentence, are to be made to a date not later than 90 days after the effective date of this chapter. Notification of the making of such decisions shall be published in the Federal Register. Nothing in this section affects any decision made before November 9, 1978.

#### (c) Law governing rights-of-way

Rights-of-way over any Federal land with respect to an approved crude oil transportation system or the Long Beach-Midland project shall be governed by the provisions of section 185 of title 30, other than subsection (w)(2) of such section.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title V, §509, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3162.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date this chapter becomes effective and the effective date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), mean the date of enactment of title V of Pub. L. 95–617, which was approved Nov. 9, 1978.
### §1869a. Contracts for precollege science or engineering curriculum development activities; inspection of materials by parent or guardian

After August 9, 1975, the Director of the National Science Foundation, shall require, as a condition of any award made by the National Science Foundation for the purpose of precollege science or engineering curriculum development activities, that the awardee, and any subcontractors involved in the distribution, marketing, or selling of such science or engineering curricula, shall include in any testing agreement, sales contract, or other comparable legal instrument a provision requiring that all instructional materials, including teacher's manuals, films, tapes, or other supplementary instructional materials developed or provided under such award, subcontract, or other legal instrument, will be made available within the school district using such materials for inspection by parents or guardians of children engaged in educational programs or projects of that school district. In addition, the Director of the National Science Foundation shall take such action as may be necessary and feasible to modify awards made for the purpose of precollege science or engineering curriculum development and implementation activities on or before August 9, 1975, to include such a provision in all possible cases.

(Pub. L. 94–86, §2(b), Aug. 9, 1975, 89 Stat. 428; Pub. L. 99–159, title I, §110(b), Nov. 22, 1985, 99 Stat. 892.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1985—Pub. L. 99–159 inserted "or engineering" after "science" in three places.
#### In re BLUM. In re BUNNELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 24, 1905.)

In the matter of Benjamin Blum. In the matter of Mary T. Bunnell. E. L. Mooney, for Blum. H. W. Thomas, for Bunnell. No opinion. Order affirmed, with'$10 costs and disbursements.