alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2806. Geospatial data standards

#### (a) In general

In accordance with section 216 of the E-Government Act of 2002 (44 U.S.C. 3501 note), the Committee shall establish standards for each National Geospatial Data Asset data theme, which—

(1) shall include—

(A) rules, conditions, guidelines, and characteristics for the geospatial data within the National Geospatial Data Asset data theme and related processes, technology, and organization; and

(B) content standards for metadata for geospatial data within the National Geospatial Data Asset data theme;

(2) to the maximum extent practicable, shall be consistent with international standards and protocols;

(3) shall include universal data standards that shall be acceptable for the purposes of declassified intelligence community data; and

(4) the Committee shall periodically review and update as necessary for the standards to remain current, relevant, and effective.

#### (b) Development of standards

The Committee shall—

(1) develop and promulgate standards under this section—

(A) in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A–119, or any successor thereto; and

(B) after consultation with a broad range of data users and providers;

(2) to the maximum extent possible, use national and international standards adopted by voluntary standards consensus bodies; and

(3) establish new standards only to the extent standards described in paragraph (2) do not exist.

#### (c) Exclusion

The Secretary of the Interior shall withhold from public disclosure any information the disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national interest, security, or defense of the United States, including information relating to geospatial intelligence data activities, as determined in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title VII, §757, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3423.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 216 of the E-Government Act of 2002, referred to in subsec. (a), is section 216 of Pub. L. 107–347, which is set out in a note under section 3501 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09** 
**- 193**  **9**

RENEE IMEH OKON,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a American Servicing Company; FRE MONT INVESTMENT & LOAN, INCORPORATED,
a /k/a Fremont & Investment and Loan , Defendant s
- Appell ee s .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8 :0 8

- c v - 0 1 05 8

- RW T )

Submitted : February 19, 2010 Decided: Ma rch 4 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and D UNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Renee Imeh Okon , Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Hefferon, Joseph Yenouskas, GOODWIN & PROCT E R, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Harold G. Belko witz, O B ER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, Washington, D.C. , for Appellee s .

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Renee Imeh Okon appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action a rising
under the Truth in Lending Act. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Okon v. Wells Fargo Home
Mortgage, Inc. , No. 8:08

- cv
- 01058

- RWT (D. Md. July 29, 2009)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Theophilus Ward, Appellant. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Smythe, Appellant.

[In each action] Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s brief. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February Term, commencing January 30, 1961; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel denied. It appears from the motion papers that appellant either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Witham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

                                            /s/John A. Witham
                                            ---------------------------
                                            John A. Witham
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
                                            April 9, 2004
§ 1000.508 If the recipient monitoring identifies programmatic concerns, what happens? If the recipient's monitoring activities identify areas of concerns, the recipient will take corrective actions which may include but are not limited to one or more of the following actions: ( a ) Depending upon the nature of the concern, the recipient may obtain additional training or technical assistance from HUD, other Indian tribes or TDHEs, or other entities.
( b ) The recipient may develop and/or revise policies, or ensure that existing policies are better enforced.
( c ) The recipient may take appropriate administrative action to remedy the situation.
( d ) The recipient may refer the concern to an auditor or to HUD for additional corrective action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                          14,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  350,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,774)
<INVENTORY>                                    173,416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               584,176
<PP&E>                                          94,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                (41,471)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 682,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          649,311
<BONDS>                                         56,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,457)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   682,834
<SALES>                                      1,044,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,261,219
<CGS>                                          937,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,103,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,138
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
§ 3280.510 Heat loss certificate. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75750 , Sept. 16, 2024.
The manufactured home manufacturer shall permanently affix the following “Certificate” to an interior surface of the home that is readily visible to the homeowner. The “Certificate” shall specify the following: ( a ) *Heating zone certification.* The design zone at which the manufactured home heat loss complies with § 3280.506(a).
( b ) *Outdoor certification temperature.* The lowest outdoor temperature at which the installed heating equipment will maintain a 70 °F temperature inside the home without storm sash or insulating glass for Zones 1 and 2, and with storm sash or insulating glass for Zone 3 and complying with § 3280.508 and § 3280.509.
( c ) *Operating economy certification temperature.* The temperature to be specified for operating economy and energy conservation shall be 20 °F or 30% of the design temperature difference, whichever is greater, added to the temperature specified as the heating system capacity certification temperature without storm windows or insulating glass in Zones 1 and 2 and with storm windows or insulating glass in Zone 3. Design temperature difference is 70° minus the heating system capacity certification temperature in degrees Fahrenheit. HEATING CERTIFICATE Home Manufacturer Plant Location Home Model (Include Uo Value Zone Map) This manufactured home has been thermally insulated to conform with the requirements of the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards for all locations within Uo Value Zone ____. Heating Equipment Manufacturer Heating Equipment Model The above heating equipment has the capacity to maintain an average 70F temperature in this home at outdoor temperatures of [see paragraph (b) of this section] F. To maximize furnace operating economy and to conserve energy, it is recommended that this home be installed where the outdoor winter design temperature (97 1/2%) is not higher than [see paragraph (c) of this section] F degrees Fahrenheit. The above information has been calculated assuming a maximum wind velocity of 15 MPH at standard atmospheric pressure.
( d ) The following additional statement must be provided on the heating certificate and data plate required by § 3280.5 when the home is built with a vapor retarder of not greater than one perm (dry cup method) on the exterior side of the insulation: “This home is designed and constructed to be sited only in humid or fringe climate regions as shown on the Humid and Fringe Climate Map.” A reproduction of the Humid and Fringe Climate Map in § 3280.504 is to be provided on the heating certificate and data plate. The map must be not less than 31 ⁄ 2 inch × 21 ⁄ 4 inch in size and may be combined with the Uo Value Zone Map for Manufactured Housing in § 3280.506.
[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, as amended at 58 FR 55011, Oct. 25, 1993; 70 FR 72048, Nov. 30, 2005]
§ 248.234 Section 8 rental assistance. ( a ) When providing rental assistance under section 8, the Commissioner may enter into a contract with an owner, contingent upon the future availability of appropriations for the purpose of renewing expiring contracts for rental assistance as provided in appropriations Acts, to extend the term of such rental assistance for such additional period or periods as is necessary to carry out an approved plan of action.
( b ) The contract and the approved plan of action shall provide that, if the Commissioner is unable to develop a revised package of incentives providing benefits to the owner comparable to those received under the original approved plan of action, the Commissioner, upon the request of the owner, shall take the following actions (subject to the limitations under the following paragraphs): ( 1 ) Modification of the binding commitments made pursuant to § 248.233(d) that are dependent on such rental assistance.
( 2 ) If action under paragraph (b)(1) is not feasible, release of an owner from the binding commitments made pursuant to § 248.233(d) that are dependent on such rental assistance.
( 3 ) If actions under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) would, in the determination of the Commissioner, result in the default of the insured loan, approval of the revised plan of action, notwithstanding § 248.221, that involves the termination of low-income affordability restrictions.
( c ) The approved plan of action shall specify actions that the Commissioner and the owner shall take to ensure that any tenants displaced as a result of actions taken under paragraph (b) of this section are relocated to affordable housing.
( d ) At least 30 days prior to making a request under the preceding sentence, an owner shall notify the Commissioner of the owner's intention to submit the request. The Commissioner shall have a period of 90 days following receipt of such notice to take action to extend the rental assistance contract and to continue the binding commitments under paragraph (b).
[55 FR 38952, Sept. 21, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 57 FR 12041, 12060, Apr. 8, 1992]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO ANTONIO BAUTISTA,

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN F. SALAZAR, Warden,

MATTHEW CATE, Secretary,

California Department of Corrections

and Rehabilitation,

 Respondents.

______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-4646 MMC (PR)

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

FOURTH REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

TRAVERSE

(Docket No. 26) 

Good cause appearing, petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file a traverse is

hereby GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his traverse no later than August 6, 2010. As

petitioner, however, has now been provided with approximately one year to file a traverse, no

further extensions will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. In

particular, if petitioner determines he will be unable to comply with this order due to

additional delays in his scheduled eye surgery and/or the receipt of his prescription

eyeglasses, any request for a further extension of time must be supported by declarations or

other evidence from prison officials regarding the scheduling of petitioner’s eye surgery

and/or the receipt of his eyeglasses.

This order terminates Docket No. 26 .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 14, 2010 /s/ Vaughn R. Walker for MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04646-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/14/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2898 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2898

To authorize the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue a consumer 
 product safety rule to prevent injuries to users of vending machines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Consumer Product Safety Commission to issue a consumer 
 product safety rule to prevent injuries to users of vending machines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vending Machine Safety Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds the following:
            (1) In May 2005, a 3 year old boy in Elkhart, Indiana, had 
        to be rescued by firefighters after he was trapped in a crane 
        vending machine. The boy was rescued after firefighters removed 
        the back of the machine.
            (2) In June 2000, a 4 year old boy in O'Fallon, Missouri, 
        had to be rescued after getting trapped inside a crane vending 
        machine. The child crawled into the machine through the trap 
        door through which toys are dispensed. The child was freed from 
        the machine only after rescue workers pried the top of the 
        machine off.
            (3) In June 2000, another case of a child being trapped 
        inside the same trap door of a crane vending machine occurred 
        in Texas.
            (4) Since 1990, the Consumer Product Safety Commission has 
        received at least 43 reported incidents of individuals' use of 
        vending machines which has resulted in personal injury 
        primarily to the individuals' arms and hands.
            (5) At least 25 of the reported injuries were suffered by 
        minors, 15 of which were by children under the age of 10.
            (6) It is clear that there are defects in the design of the 
        vending machines which have led to the reported injuries.

SEC. 3. VENDING MACHINE RULE.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Consumer Product Safety Commission shall issue a consumer product 
safety standard under section 7 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 
U.S.C. 2056), for the manufacture and installation of vending machines, 
particularly those using a lever or crane apparatus to dispense a 
product. Such standard may include a requirement for warning labels or 
signs relating to the use of such machines to prevent injuries to 
individuals, including children.
                                 <all>
```
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 635 V

Filed: October 16 , 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

LINDA HAFT

, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Influenza Vaccine or Flu Vaccine;

* Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration; SIRVA

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell

, Chief Special Master:

On July 21 , 2014

, Linda Haft filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

, 2 [ the “Vaccine

Act” or “Program”]. Peti tioner alleged that s he suffered a shoulder injury which was

caused in fact by the influenza vaccine she received on October 17 , 2013. Petit ion at 1

. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On October 16 , 2014 , respondent filed her Rule 4(c) r eport [“Res

. R eport”] in

which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Res. Report

at 1 . Specifically, respondent indicates “ that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with

a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and that it was caused in

fact by the flu vacc ine sh e received on Octo ber 17 , 2013. ” Id. at 4. Respondent agrees

that petitioner ’s injury lasted for more than six months and that no other causes for

petitioner’s injury can be identified. Id.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I inte nd to

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501

note (2006)) . In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitione r has 14 day s to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits withi n this definition, I will redact such

m aterial from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2006).2

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that

petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

s/Denise K. Vowe ll

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 3/31/00 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          24,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,047)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,445
<PP&E>                                          34,454
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,662
<SALES>                                         28,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,073
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   493
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,404)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,582)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,582)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>