alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (a) | A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from November 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 has been made under my supervision. |
|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period. |

|                                                                                                                           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                           |
| /s/ Ryan M. Hershberger                                                                                                   |
| Ryan M. HershbergerAssistant Treasurer ofFord Motor Credit Company LLC,as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2019-C |
§ 248.123 Determination of Federal cost limit. ( a ) *Initial determination.* For each eligible low income housing project appraised under § 248.111, the Commissioner shall determine whether the aggregate preservation rents for the project exceed the amount determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units in the project, according to appropriate unit sizes, by 120 percent of the section 8 existing fair market rent for the appropriate unit sizes.
( b ) *Relevant local markets.* If either the extension or transfer preservation rent for a project exceeds the amount determined under paragraph (a) of this section, the Commissioner shall determine whether such extension or transfer preservation rent exceeds the amount determined by multiplying the number of units in the project, according to the appropriate unit sizes, by 120 percent of the prevailing rents in the local market area. The relevant local market, and the prevailing rents in such relevant local market, shall be determined on the basis of the appraisal conducted by the appraiser selected by the Commissioner pursuant to § 248.111 and any other information that the Commissioner determines is appropriate. If there are no comparables in the relevant local market and it is not otherwise possible to determine prevailing rents in that area, the section 8 existing fair market rent shall be the sole measure for determining the Federal cost limit.
( c ) *Effect.* The extension or transfer preservation rent for an eligible low income housing project appraised under § 248.111 shall be considered to exceed the Federal cost limit only if the extension or transfer preservation rent exceeds the amount determined under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.937 Supplementary specific procedural requirements under HUD building product standards and certification program for plastic bathtub units, plastic shower receptors and stalls, plastic lavatories, plastic water closet bowls and tanks. ( a ) *Applicable standards.* ( 1 ) Plastic bathtub units, plastic shower receptors and stalls, plastic lavatories, and plastic water closet bowls and tanks shall be designed, assembled and tested in compliance with the following standards, which are incorporated by reference: ANSI Z124.1—(1980) Plastic Bathtub Units ANSI Z124.2—(1980) Plastic Shower Receptors and Stalls ANSI Z124.3—(1980) Plastic Lavatories ANSI Z124.4—(1983) Plastic Water Closet Bowls and Tanks
( 2 ) These standards have been approved by the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference. They are available from the American National Standards Institute, Inc., 11 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036. The standards are also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) *Labeling.* ( 1 ) Under the procedures set forth in paragraph (d)(6) of § 200.935, concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's validation mark and the manufacturer's certification of compliance with the applicable standards are required to be on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer. In the case of plastic bathtub units, plastic shower receptors and stalls, plastic lavatories, and plastic water closet bowls and tanks, the following additional information shall be included on the certification label: ( i ) Manufacturer's statement of conformance to UM 73a;
( ii ) Manufacturer's name and code identifying the plant location.
( 2 ) The certification label shall be affixed to each plastic bathroom fixture.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality control inspections.* Under the procedures set forth in paragraph (d)(8) of § 200.935, concerning periodic tests and quality control inspections, the frequency of testing for a product shall be described in the specific building product certification program. In the case of plastic bathroom fixtures, testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) At least every six months, the administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified plastic bathtub unit, plastic shower receptor and stall, plastic water closet bowl and tank for testing in an approved laboratory, in accordance with applicable standards.
( 2 ) At least every twelve months, the administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified plastic lavatory for testing in accordance with applicable standards.
( 3 ) The administrator shall also review quality control procedures at each visit to determine that they continue to be followed.
[49 FR 378, Jan. 4, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 36695, July 19, 1994]
§ 266.125 Scope and nature of sanctions. ( a ) *Actions by Designated Office.* Depending on the nature and extent of the noncompliance with the requirements of this part, the Designated Office may take any of the following actions: ( 1 ) Require that the HFA execute a trust agreement, establish a trust account in accordance with such agreement, and fund such account which may be drawn upon by HUD for purposes of meeting the HFA's risk-sharing obligations;
( 2 ) Require the HFA to assume a higher portion of risk for the subject and future mortgages;
( 3 ) Recommend to the Commissioner that the HFA be required to contract its loan servicing or property disposition functions to a third party;
( 4 ) Recommend to the Commissioner that the mortgage insurance be terminated in cases of fraud or material misrepresentation by the HFA, or transfer of interest in an insured mortgage or assignment of the mortgage not in accord with the requirements of this part;
( 5 ) Recommend to the Commissioner that approval for the HFA to participate in the program be suspended or withdrawn;
( 6 ) Recommend to the Commissioner that the HFA's mortgagee approval be withdrawn pursuant to 24 CFR part 25 (regulations of the Mortgagee Review Board) and/or that penalties be imposed pursuant to 24 CFR part 30 (regulations pertaining to Civil Money Penalties; Certain Prohibited Contact);
( 7 ) Require additional financial or other reports as may be necessary to monitor the activities of the HFA more closely.
( 8 ) Require the HFA to revise any or all of its underwriting, processing, asset management, or servicing policies and procedures as directed by the Commissioner.
( b ) *Actions by Headquarters.* HUD Headquarters may impose any of the sanctions set forth or recommended in paragraph (a) of this section based upon its responsibilities for monitoring and overall program oversight.
( c ) *Effect of suspension or withdrawal.* A suspension or withdrawal action will not affect any mortgage insurance endorsement in effect on the date of the suspension or withdrawal action.
( d ) *HFA right to informal hearing.* ( 1 ) Any sanction imposed by a designated office in writing will be immediately effective, will state the grounds for the action, and provide for the HFA's right to an informal hearing before the designated office representative or designee in the designated office. The HFA may request an informal hearing within 10 working days of receipt of the suspension or withdrawal action and the Designated Office shall give the HFA an opportunity to be heard within 10 working days of receipt of the HFA's request. The HFA may be represented by counsel. The Designated Office Representative, or his or her designee, will advise the HFA in writing of the decision within 10 working days of the informal hearing, which decision will constitute final HUD action.
( 2 ) Sanctions imposed by Headquarters will be handled in a similar manner, except that the informal hearing shall be before the Commissioner or his or her designee.
[59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 83441, Dec. 22, 2020]
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0810 SAT Date: 8/23/2013 Print Date: 9/30/2013

Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes Exposure based testing (eco):

Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: P2REC: SAT: Forward
Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,L,MM; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0810-15 = FATE: MW log Kow = -2.38 (E) log Koc = 0.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E) FATE: Estimations for cation MW log Kow = 8.00 (E) log Koc = 5.93 (E) log Fish BCF = 3.04 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.32 (E) PMN Substance: Solid S = Dispersible VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed through the skin, p oor absorption from the GI tract; moderate absorption from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to eye, mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the compound.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value 0.001 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.001
algal

_ chronic value 0.001
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with a molecular weight adjustment; SAR chemical class = ; MW ; log Kow = 8.0 (EPI); solid with unknown mp (P); S = dispersible at 20 C (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations ; DWhardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DWTOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values CommentsAssessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
### §9852a. Parental consent requirement for nonemergency intrusive physical examinations

#### (a) Definition

The term "nonemergency intrusive physical examination" means, with respect to a child, a physical examination that—

(1) is not immediately necessary to protect the health or safety of the child involved or the health or safety of another individual; and

(2) requires incision or is otherwise invasive, or involves exposure of private body parts.

#### (b) Requirement

A Head Start agency shall obtain written parental consent before administration of any nonemergency intrusive physical examination of a child in connection with participation in a program under this subchapter.

#### (c) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit agencies from using established methods, for handling cases of suspected or known child abuse and neglect, that are in compliance with applicable Federal, State, or tribal law.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §657A, as added Pub. L. 110–134, §25, Dec. 12, 2007, 121 Stat. 1443.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9852a, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §657A, as added Pub. L. 103–252, title I, §123, May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 650, related to consultation with Corporation for National and Community Service, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–285, title I, §118, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2727.
### §3003. Increasing economic certainty

#### (a) Considerations

The Secretary may consider acreage rental rates, capacity fees, and other recurring annual fees in total when evaluating existing rates paid for the use of Federal land by eligible projects.

#### (b) Reductions in base rental rates

The Secretary may reduce acreage rental rates and capacity fees, or both, for existing and new wind and solar authorizations if the Secretary determines—

(1) that the existing rates—

(A) exceed fair market value;

(B) impose economic hardships;

(C) limit commercial interest in a competitive lease sale or right-of-way grant; or

(D) are not competitively priced compared to other available land; or

(2) that a reduced rental rate or capacity fee is necessary to promote the greatest use of wind and solar energy resources.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title III, §3103, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2516.)
#### Charles J. L. Simon, as Executor of George A. Simon, Deceased, Respondent, v. Emergency Hospital of the Diocese of Buffalo, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term granting the motion to amend the summons and complaint so as to insert the true and correct name of the defendant hospital.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §165. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 561, §7, 26 Stat. 1098, which related to suspension of entries for correction of clerical errors, was transferred to section 1165 of this title, prior to editorial reclassification as section 2505 of this title.
Unassociated Document


    Agreements

    


    Party A:
Meihekou City Hengyide Warehouse Logistics Co., Ltd.

    


    Party B:
Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co Ltd & China Ginseng Holding Inc

    


    As per
negotiation between Party A and B in relation to the premise located in the
address of a PRC company named in Tonghua Diyuan Grape Wine Co., Ltd., it is
agreed as follow:

    


    1) Party
A and B shall go to the PRC auction company Jilin Mingshi Auction Co. Ltd.
together to apply for the change of the purchaser’s name from Party A to Party
B. The application fee is borne by Party B.

    


    2) All
details/content of the location, land area and facilities that to be acquired
originally by Party A are remain unchanged. The consideration of RMB 9,000,000
and the agency commission that to be originally paid by Party A are remain
unchanged and shall be paid by Party B to Party A.

    


    3)
Payment method: This agreement is become effective upon date of signing, Party B
shall pay Party A of RMB 500,000 before 20 March 2010, the remaining balance
shall be repaid in full before end of June 2010.

    


    4) The
consideration of RMB 9,000,000 is calculated with the bank’s lending rate, and
shall be paid by Party B to Party A.

    


    5) Party
A is agreed to waive the rental expenses incurred by Party B for using the
premise for the period from Jan to Feb 2010.

    


    6) If the
remaining balance is not settled within June 2010, Party A has the right to
repossess the premise and confiscate the deposit paid to Party A. And Party B is
liable to compensate Party A for an amount equivalent to 6 month’s rental
expenses for using the premise.

    


    7) Both
parties shall obey the terms set out in this agreement. This agreement comes
into force promptly after the representatives of both parties sign and put on
the seal.

    


    8) This
agreement is made in 2 copies, both parties hold one.


    


    Meihekou
Hengyide Warehouse Logistics Co., Ltd. (with company seal)

    Legal
Representative: (signature)

    


    Jilin
Ganzhi Ginseng Products Co., Ltd (with company seal)

    Legal
Representative: Zhang Yuxiang

    


    China
Ginseng Holdings Inc. (with company seal)

    Legal
Representative: Liu Changzhen
#### § 14.305 Filing and service of documents.

Any application for an award or other pleading or document related to an application shall be filed and served on all parties to the proceeding in the same manner as other pleadings in the proceeding, except as provided in § 14.205(c) for confidential financial information.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL IMPEY,

Plaintiff, No. C-09-01973 EDL

v. ORDER DENYING REQUEST 

TO HEAR MOTION TO COMPEL ON

SHORTENED TIME, CONTINUING

HEARING ON MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

 THE OFFICE DEPOT, INC.

Defendant.

_______________________________/

The parties are hereby notified that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

is continued from June 8, 2010 to June 29, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed on or

before June 1, 2010, and Defendant’s Reply shall be due on June 8, 2010. The parties’ stipulated

request to hear Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel on shortened time is DENIED, and the motion will be

heard on May 25, 2010 as currently scheduled. The Further Case Management Conference currently

set for May 4, 2010 is hereby continued to May 25, 2010 and will be conducted immediately following

the hearing on the Motion to Compel.

Dated: April 26, 2010 _______________________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01973-EDL Document 57 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 26.5 Disqualification of hearing officer. ( a ) When a hearing officer believes there is a basis for disqualification in a particular proceeding, the hearing officer shall withdraw by notice on the record and shall notify the Secretary and the official initiating the action under appeal.
( b ) Whenever any party believes that the hearing officer should be disqualified from presiding in a particular proceeding, the party may file a motion with the hearing officer requesting the hearing officer to withdraw from presiding over the proceedings. This motion shall be supported by affidavits setting forth the alleged grounds for disqualification.
( c ) Upon the filing of a motion and affidavit, the hearing officer shall proceed no further in the case until the matter of disqualification is resolved.
( d ) If the hearing officer does not withdraw, a written statement of his or her reasons shall be incorporated in the record and the hearing shall proceed, unless the decision is appealed in accordance with the procedures set forth in § 26.27.
### §1211. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1211 was editorially reclassified as section 1476 of this title.
#### § 232.901 Mortgages covering existing projects are eligible for insurance.

A mortgage executed in connection with the purchase or refinancing of an existing project without substantial rehabilitation may be insured under this subpart pursuant to section 223(f) of the Act. A mortgage insured pursuant to this subpart shall meet all other requirements of this part except as expressly modified by this subpart.

[59 FR 61228, Nov. 29, 1994]
§ 1000.404 What lenders are eligible for participation? Eligible lenders are those approved under and meeting the qualifications established in this subpart, except that loans otherwise insured or guaranteed by an agency of the United States, or made by an organization of Indians from amounts borrowed from the United States, shall not be eligible for guarantee under this part. The following lenders are deemed to be eligible under this subpart: ( a ) Any mortgagee approved by HUD for participation in the single family mortgage insurance program under title II of the National Housing Act;
( b ) Any lender whose housing loans under chapter 37 of title 38, United States Code, are automatically guaranteed pursuant to section 1802(d) of such title;
( c ) Any lender approved by the Department of Agriculture to make guaranteed loans for single family housing under the Housing Act of 1949;
( d ) Any other lender that is supervised, approved, regulated, or insured by any agency of the United States; and
( e ) Any other lender approved by the Secretary.
#### Town of Huntington et al., Appellants, v Park Shore Country Day Camp of Dix Hills, Inc., Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to enjoin defendant from operating commercial tennis courts on its residentially zoned property, in which defendant, by way of counterclaim, seeks a declaration that the zoning chapter of the Code of the Town of Huntington is unconstitutional as applied to its property, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 30, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, denied the application for a permanent injunction. Judgment reversed, on the law, with costs; application for injunctive relief granted in accordance with the relief sought therefor in the complaint; and it is declared that the zoning ordinance in question is not illegal and unconstitutional as applied to defendant’s property. Action remanded to Special Term for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment in accordance herewith. Special Term held that the ordinance in question was unconstitutional as applied because it permitted tennis courts operated as an ancillary function of a nonprofit private club or school, but did not permit them as profit-making enterprises in this residentially zoned area. Zoning ordinances are presumed constitutional and a questioner has the burden of proving invalidity " 'beyond a reasonable doubt’ ” *(Marcus Assoc. v Town of Huntington,*57 AD2d 116, 117). Defendant has not met this burden and, accordingly, the judgment must be reversed and an injunction granted (see *Matter of Tarolli v Howe,*37 NY2d 865). Titone, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### § 239.14 Arbitration.

Any controversy or claim between USAID and any Noteholder arising out of the Guarantee shall be settled by arbitration to be held in Washington, DC in accordance with the then prevailing rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrators may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction.