alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6275. Relationship between standby emergency authorities and international energy program

The purpose of the Congress in enacting this subchapter is to provide standby energy emergency authority to deal with energy shortage conditions and to minimize economic dislocations and adverse impacts on employment. While the authorities contained in this subchapter may, to the extent authorized by this subchapter, be used to carry out obligations incurred by the United States in connection with the International Energy Program, this subchapter shall not be construed in any way as advice and consent, ratification, endorsement, or other form of congressional approval of the specific terms of such program.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title II, §255, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 900.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Manuel RUIZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50450.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007 *.

Filed March 21, 2007,

Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*646Timothy R. Garrison, Federal Defenders Of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Victor Manuel Ruiz-Estrada appeals from the 24-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of bringing an illegal alien into the United States without presentation and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ruiz-Estrada challenges the district court’s application of a two-level upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4 for the use or attempted use of a minor to commit the crime of alien smuggling. We cannot say that the district court clearly erred in finding the enhancement. The district court found that Ruiz-Estrada, who falsely claimed U.S. citizenship at the primary inspection, was attempting to use his U.S. citizen children to avoid detection. The court noted that Ruiz-Estrada had twice previously been arrested for alien smuggling with some of his children in the car. *See United States v. Castro-Hernandez,*258 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (9th Cir.2001).

Ruiz-Estrada also contends that he is entitled to resentencing because the district court gave the sentencing guidelines presumptive weight in violation of *United States v. Zavala,*443 F.3d 1165, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2006), *en banc reh’g granted,*462 F.3d 1066 (2006). Even if we assume that it is improper for a district court to treat the guidelines sentencing range as the presumptive sentence, Ruiz-Estrada is not entitled to any relief. The record in this case shows that the district court did not treat the guidelines range as the presumptive sentence.

Ruiz-Estrada’s second motion to file a late reply brief is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), I, Michael G. Long, Chief Financial Officerof Edge Petroleum Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the three months ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:      May 12, 2008 | /s/  | Michael G. Long                        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                        |      | Michael G. Long                        |
|                                                        |      | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer |

 

----
**GAO-08-365R**                      Published: Dec 18, 2007. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2007.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

At an October 30, 2007, hearing before the subcommittee on U.S. efforts to secure, stabilize, and rebuild Iraq, several members requested additional information on international donors' pledges to reconstruction and stabilization efforts in Iraq. This correspondence provides updated information on the amounts of loans and grants pledged by each donor country, as well as the status of those pledges.

## Full Report

Full Report (7 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

International Affairs

Foreign aid programsForeign financial assistanceForeign governmentsForeign loansGrantsInternational organizationsInternational relationsIraq War and reconstructionIraq reconstructionGrant programs
### §7651m. Enforcement

It shall be unlawful for any person subject to this subchapter to violate any prohibition of, requirement of, or regulation promulgated pursuant to this subchapter shall be a violation of this chapter.1 In addition to the other requirements and prohibitions provided for in this subchapter, the operation of any affected unit to emit sulfur dioxide in excess of allowances held for such unit shall be deemed a violation, with each ton emitted in excess of allowances held constituting a separate violation.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title IV, §414, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title IV, §401, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2625.)

1 So in original.
### Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 3631 Dir ID: 2015

- NM

- 060

- AD



## FA A M C A I A D W O R KSHEET ( C O N T I NU E D )

C on t acts. W ith w h o m o u tside t he F A A h a s th i s prop os al been di s cu s sed?

Organ i zat i on P erson C ont a cted D ate R e s pon s e

N at i o n a l B u s ine s s Air c r af t As s o ci a t i o n E li C ott i 3 / 5 / 1 5

Re g i o n a l Airline A ss o ci at i o n 3 / 5 / 1 5

Air c r af t O w ners & P il ot s A s s o ci at i o n R o bert Ha ck m a n 3 / 5 / 1 5

Airlines fo r A m e r ica R o bert I r e l a nd 3 / 5 / 1 5
### §1541. Allocation of costs; repayment

Upon completion of each lower basin unit of the project herein or hereafter authorized, or separate feature thereof, the Secretary shall allocate the total costs of constructing said unit or features to (1) commercial power, (2) irrigation, (3) municipal and industrial water supply, (4) flood control, (5) navigation, (6) water quality control, (7) recreation, (8) fish and wildlife, (9) the replenishment of the depletion of Colorado River flows available for use in the United States occasioned by performance of the Water Treaty of 1944 with the United Mexican States (Treaty Series 994; 59 Stat. 1219), and (10) any other purposes authorized under the Federal reclamation laws. Costs of construction, operation, and maintenance allocated to the replenishment of the depletion of Colorado River flows available for use in the United States occasioned by compliance with the Mexican Water Treaty (including losses in transit, evaporation from regulatory reservoirs, and regulatory losses at the Mexican boundary, incurred in the transportation, storage, and delivery of water in discharge of the obligations of that treaty) shall be nonreimbursable: Provided, That the nonreimbursable allocation shall be made on a pro rata basis to be determined by the ratio between the amount of water required to comply with the Mexican Water Treaty and the total amount of water by which the Colorado River is augmented pursuant to the investigations authorized subchapter II of this chapter and any future Congressional authorization. The repayment of costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (79 Stat. 213) [16 U.S.C. 460l–12 et seq.]: Provided, That all of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement as a part of the Dixie project, Utah, shall be nonreimbursable. Costs allocated to nonreimbursable purposes shall be nonreturnable under the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title IV, §401, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 894.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation laws, referred to in par. (10), are identified in section 1554 of this title.

The Federal Water Project Recreation Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–72, July 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 213, which is classified principally to part C (§460l–12 et seq.) of subchapter LXIX of chapter 1 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 460l–12 of Title 16 and Tables.

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 90–537, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 885, known as the Colorado River Basin Project Act, which enacted this chapter and sections 616aa–1, 620a–1, 620a–2, 620c–1, and 620d–1 of this title, amended sections 616hh, 620, and 620a of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 620, 620k, and 1501 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 4, 2014

No. 04-13-00572-CR

Fernando LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-2454-CR

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due January 3, 2014; however, the court granted 

appellant a thirty-day extension of time. Appellant has filed a motion requesting an additional 

fourteen-day extension until February 17, 2014, to file the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellant to file the brief by February 18, 2014. 

Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of 

extraordinary circumstances. Any request for a further extension of time must (1) show

extraordinary circumstances, (2) advise the court of the efforts counsel has expended in 

preparing the brief, and (3) provide the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be 

completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
-1- STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT S. FURSTMAN, Cal. Bar No. 76476

LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT S. FURSTMAN

510 North Third Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone: 408-292-4132

Facsimile: 408-292-4162

sfurstman@sbcglobal.net

Attorneys for Defendants

SS PACIFIC STAR; INTERNATIONAL

DATA SECURITY, INC.; and INTERNATIONAL

MARITIME SECURITY ALLIANCE, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESCO MARINE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SS PACIFIC STAR, (ex-ARTSHIP, exGOLDEN BEAR), her engines, tackle,

equipment, appurtenances, freights, cargo, etc.

(Official Number 239932) in rem,

INTERNATIONAL DATA SECURITY,

INC., a Delaware corporate entity; and

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME SECURITY

ALLIANCE, LLC., a Delaware corporate

entity,

Defendants.

Case No. CV 08 05575 SI

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE / RESET

MOTION AND HEARING DATES;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties, through their respective undersigned counsel of record, stipulate that the time

within which Plaintiff may file its Motion to Join Defendants may be extended from

February 26, 2010 to March 5, 2010 with opposition thereto being filed on March 12, 2010 and

any reply thereto being filed on March 19, 2010. The parties further stipulate that hearing on the

Motion to Join Defendants may be continued from March 19, 2010 to March 26, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.

Case 3:08-cv-05575-SI Document 45 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 2
-2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This stipulation is entered into at the request of counsel for the Defendants to allow

additional time to complete depositions of the Defendants principals. The delay is as a result of

defense counsel’s illness and unavailability to attend depositions as noticed by Plaintiff for

February 17, 18 and 19, 2010. The parties have agreed that the depositions will proceed during

the week of February 22, 2010 without further notice or order of the Court.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: February 16, 2010 ____ ____ LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT S. FURSTMAN

By /s/ Scott S. Furstman

SCOTT S. FURSTMAN

Attorney for Defendants SS PACIFIC STAR;

INTERNATIONAL DATA SECURITY, INC.;

and INTERNATIONAL MARITIME

SECURITY ALLIANCE

DATED: February 16, 2010 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

By /s/ Norman J. Ronneberg, Jr.

NORMAN J. RONNEBERG

Attorneys for Plaintiff ESCO MARINE, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated thereto, it is ordered that the time

within which Plaintiff may file its Motion to Join Defendants is extended to March 5, 2010;

Defendants’ Opposition shall be filed on March 12, 2010; Plaintiffs Reply shall be filed on

March 19, 2010 and hearing on the motion shall be continued to March 26, 2010 at 9:00a.m.

DATED: February_____, 2010

_________________________________

Susan Illston, U. S. District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05575-SI Document 45 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2755 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2755

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the income 
  tax treatment of legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
                   nonphysical personal injury cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the income 
  tax treatment of legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
                   nonphysical personal injury cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victims Tax Fairness Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH NONPHYSICAL 
              PERSONAL INJURY CASES.

    (a) Inclusion in Gross Income.--Part II of subchapter B of chapter 
1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically 
included in gross income) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new section:

``SEC. 91. LEGAL FEES AWARDED OR RECEIVED IN CONNECTION WITH 
              NONPHYSICAL PERSONAL INJURY CASES.

    ``Gross income includes amounts awarded to or received by the 
taxpayer, whether by suit or agreement, on account of nonphysical 
personal injury which are designated for attorneys' fees and costs.''.
    (b) Deduction for Legal Fees Awarded or Received in Connection With 
Nonphysical Personal Injury Cases Allowed Whether or not Taxpayer 
Elects to Itemize.--Subsection (a) of section 62 of such Code (relating 
to general rule) is amended by redesignating paragraph (19) (relating 
to costs involving discrimination suits, etc. ) as paragraph (20) and 
by inserting after such paragraph (20) the following new paragraph:
            ``(20) Legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
        nonphysical personal injury cases.--Attorneys' fees and costs 
        awarded to or paid by the taxpayer, whether by suit or 
        agreement, on account of nonphysical personal injury.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part II of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by adding at the end 
the following new item:

``Sec. 91. Legal fees awarded or received in connection with 
                            nonphysical personal injury cases.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to judgments and settlements entered after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §§7801, 7802. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §110(a), Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101

Section 7801, Pub. L. 95–467, §2, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1305, set out Congressional findings and declarations for a water research and development program.

Section 7802, Pub. L. 95–467, §3, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1305, set out Congressional statement of purpose.

For similar provisions, see section 10301 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §110(b), Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101, provided that: "Rules and regulations issued prior to the date of enactment of this Act [Mar. 22, 1984] under the authority of Public Law 95–467 [this chapter] shall remain in full force and effect under this Act [repealing this chapter and enacting chapter 109 (§10301 et seq.) of this title] until superseded by new rules and regulations promulgated under this Act."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–467, §1, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1305, which provided that Pub. L. 95–467 was to be cited as the "Water Research and Development Act of 1978", was repealed by section 110(a) of Pub. L. 98–242.
### §1624. Regulations; issuance; publication in Federal Register

The Secretary is authorized to issue and publish in the Federal Register, pursuant to subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 92–203, §25, Dec. 18, 1971, 85 Stat. 715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"Subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5" substituted for "the Administrative Procedure Act" on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §1654. Antitrust laws

The grant of a right-of-way, permit, lease, or other authorization pursuant to this chapter shall grant no immunity from the operation of the Federal anti-trust laws.

(Pub. L. 93–153, title II, §205, Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 588.)
### 1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1

1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1
1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1

1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1

1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1

1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1

1
1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 F o r t B e r t h o l d I n d i a n R e s e r v a t i o n ; N o r t h D a k o t a , U S E P A R e g i o n 8 

# £ D i s c l a i m e r : E P A m a k e s n o c l a i m r e g a r d i n g t h e a c c u r a c y o r p r e c i s i o n o f t h e s e d a t a . Q u e s t i o n s c o n c e r n i n g t h e d a t a s h o u l d b e r e f e r r e d t o t h e s o u r c e a g e n c y . T h i s m a p d o e s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y r e p r e s e n t E P A ' s p o s i t i o n o n a n y I n d i a n C o u n t r y b o u n d a r i e s o r t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n a l s t a t u s o f a n y s p e c i f i c l o c a t i o n . D a t e : J u n e 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 M a p P r o j e c t i o n : U T M , M e t e r s , Z o n e 1 3 N , N A D 8 3 . D a t a S o u r c e s : R e s e r v a t i o n s - U . S . C e n s u s B u r e a u ( 2 0 0 9 ) ; C

o u n t i e s - U . S . C e n s u s B u r e a u ( 2 0 0 9 ) ; N

A t i v e A m e r i c a n P o p - U . S . C e n s u s B u r e a u B l o c k G r o u p s ( 2 0 1 0 ) ; B a s e - M i c r o s o f t B i n g w e b s e r v i c e ( 2 0 1 2 ) .



### 1 P r o p o s e d G a s W e l l s F o r t B e r t h o l d I n d i a n R e s e r v a t i o n P e r c e n t N a t i v e A m e r i c a n 0 % t o 2 5 % 2 5 % t o 5 0 % 5 0 % t o 7 5 % 7 5 % t o 1 0 0 %

A r e a E n l a r g e d 0 3 . 5 7 1 0 . 5 1 . 7 5 M i l e s 0 8 1 6 4 K i l o m e t e r s 

## L a k e S 

# a k a k a w e a
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:17:01-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office