alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STEAM ELECTRIC REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03528

This media is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the 

EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive 

a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made 

as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, 

Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 

Washington, DC. 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744 

Fax: 202-566- 9744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov 

Final version of the steam electric sampling analytical database 

including all EPA sampling data and monitoring data used for 

development of the effluent limits and pollutant loadings.
### §7661e. Other authorities

#### (a) In general

Nothing in this subchapter shall prevent a State, or interstate permitting authority, from establishing additional permitting requirements not inconsistent with this chapter.

#### (b) Permits implementing acid rain provisions

The provisions of this subchapter, including provisions regarding schedules for submission and approval or disapproval of permit applications, shall apply to permits implementing the requirements of subchapter IV–A except as modified by that subchapter.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title V, §501, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2645.)
### §8235. "Residential building" defined

As used in this part, the term "residential building" means any building used as a residence which is not a new building to which final standards under sections 6833(a) and 6834 1 of this title apply and which has a system for heating, cooling, or both.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title II, §261, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §562, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 746.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 6834 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title X, §1041(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 621.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Statement of Purpose

Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §561, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 746, provided that: "It is the purpose of this subtitle [subtitle C (§§561–563) of title V of Pub. L. 96–294, enacting this part]—

"(1) to establish a program under which the Secretary of Energy may provide assistance to State and local governments to encourage up to four demonstration programs that make energy conservation measures available without charge to residential property owners and tenants under a plan designed to maximize the energy savings available in residential buildings in designated areas; and

"(2) to demonstrate through such program prototype residential energy efficiency plans under which State and local governments, State regulatory authorities, and public utilities may participate in a cooperative manner with public or private entities to install energy conservation measures in the greatest possible number of residential buildings within their respective jurisdictions or service areas."

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 1003.101 Area ONAP allocation of funds. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, funds will be allocated to the Area ONAPs responsible for the program on the following basis: ( 1 ) Each Area ONAP will be allocated $1,000,000 as a base amount, to which will be added a formula share of the balance of the ICDBG Program funds, as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) The amount remaining after the base amount is allocated and any amount retained by the Headquarters ONAP to fund imminent threat grants pursuant to the provisions of § 1003.402 is subtracted, will be allocated to each Area ONAP based on the most recent data complied and published by the United States Bureau of the Census referable to the same point or period in time, as follows: ( i ) Forty percent (40%) of the funds will be allocated based upon each Area ONAP's share of the total eligible Indian population;
( ii ) Forty percent (40%) of the funds will be allocated based upon each Area ONAP's share of the total extent of poverty among the eligible Indian population; and
( iii ) Twenty percent (20%) of the funds will be allocated based upon each Area ONAP's share of the total extent of overcrowded housing among the eligible Indian population.
( b ) HUD will use other criteria to determine an allocation formula for distributing funds to the Area ONAPs if funds are set aside by statute for a specific purpose in any fiscal year if it is determined that the formula in paragraph (a) of this section is inappropriate to accomplish the purpose. HUD will use other criteria if it is determined that, based on a limited appropriation of funds, the use of the formula in paragraph (a) of this section is inappropriate to obtain an equitable allocation of funds.
( c ) Data used for the allocation of funds will be based upon the Indian population of those tribes and villages that are determined to be eligible ninety (90) days before the beginning of each fiscal year.
H. R. 2630

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1927 

Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, Illinois, as the ‘‘J.M. Dietrich Northeast Annex’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1927 Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, Illinois, and known as the 

Northeast Annex, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J.M. 

Dietrich Northeast Annex’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J.M. Dietrich 

Northeast Annex’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### West Virginia Coal Company et al., appellants, v. Mary Staub et al., appellees.

Charge that defendants, by mining coal, caused a subsidence of surface. Judgment for plaintiffs for $500. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. George A. Crow, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at- the March term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

M. C. Young and F. E. Merrills, for appellants. Turner, Holder & Bullington, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §9845. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–252, title I, §117, May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 648

Section, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §650, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 505; Pub. L. 101–501, title I, §117(c), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1233, directed Secretary to make public announcement concerning grants or contracts for research, demonstrations, pilot projects, studies, or reports under this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective May 18, 1994, but not applicable to Head Start agencies and other recipients of financial assistance under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) until Oct. 1, 1994, see section 127 of Pub. L. 103–252, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 9832 of this title.
#### Mary Kay Steakin, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Michael Recine, Respondent-Appellant, v Voicestream Wireless Corporation et al., Appellants-Respondents, and Cross State Construction, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendants. Cross State Construction Corp., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Electrical Communications Services, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And a Second Third-Party Action.)

[832 NYS2d 805]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered May 1, 2006, which, inter alia, in an action for personal injuries under the Labor Law, denied motions for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and granted defendant contractor Cross State’s motion for summary judgment on its claim for contractual indemnification against its subcontractor and plaintiff’s employer, third-party defendant Electrical Communications Services, Inc. (ECS), unanimously modified, on the law, to make the grant of summary judgment in favor of Cross State and against ECS conditional, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied to all parties on the issue of liability, there being an issue of fact as to whether, inter alia, plaintiffs failure to use a furnished safety device was the sole proximate cause of the accident *(see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of N.Y. City,*1 NY3d 280 [2003]). We modify as above indicated because the subject agreement, inter alia, limits Cross State’s right to indemnification to ECS’s proportionate fault for the accident, as to which issues of fact exist. We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of JER Investors Trust Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert,
Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                              |  |                                                  
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | /s/    JOSEPH E. ROBERT,
JR.
|Dated: December 17, 2010 |  | Name:                        |  | Joseph E. Robert, Jr.                            
|                         |  | Title:                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
#### David L. Gittlitz et al., Respondents, v. Robert S. Lewis, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Motion for a stay, pending appeal, granted on condition that appellant be ready to argue or submit the appeal on September 16, 1.960.
!

	
  




 
		







	

 " 

	 
	

	 
	
	
 	

 	 


 #
 

	


 			

 		

 
	


	 	
 


	 	 
	 
		


	
 "	 $

% 

&

	







	








0&& %


 



 
	12


"	 $% 




34	


	
	


	


	




 #	
	 


 


	
1	
		
(

		2

 #	
	 	
		  
	




1	
	 





(
	2

 #	
	 

 
 



1	
	






	
2

 #	
	   


 


-	1	
	 


		





2

"	 $% 
 

5	



	


 
 


		 





 



&

	
	







	
	






#
	


!



6	1#!62   	

,
 "	 $

% 

&


 #!6	

	

6

	 



	




	 	
	

	
	*
 














	&

	

	


	

 


	





			



	
 
&

7

 
-	 	


	 

  



 	
				
 






	
	&

8

 


	 
	 
  




		 
	



	&


	


	


 



  



		


 
 
 	



	 
  	
	

 


 	
		 

 




 
	 


 '	
(

		
  





(
	

 
	 	
		 
	
	



(
	

	

	
 	
	

 
	 

 )
 
	






	




 
*

*	
	





	


 
	  +




	





 




		












	  	 

	



		
			

	


		
			 		
			



 
	









 



	


 "
	

,


		 


	
	




	-  

	 
	

	 


&

 .	




	


  



				


		

 



	


	 

		


&

 /	
			


	



		


	



&

 $	 


	

,






"	 $

% 

&

 '	






-	


	

&

		
	


 
 	


	






	
	 
	


	
	
	



 
	
		 

		
 

	5

	 	



	&

 
	
	



		



,

	


	 




	


	




	


	
	



  
	

	&

 6*	
	
	








	
  
 





 	&

 "
	






	


	



	
	 






 	



 	  







 	



 	


	
	
				
		
	


 	 9
	
 /		
: 7

& 

6
$ 
	/; #
	

!


$
6	; #
	
!

6	; 0&&

%
 

 
	; 



.&

<4=*>?*<?3@
.
!
	
6	:$&





	 	











 !"#$%$

&&	 '(%)""*#$%$

 +#%",-%.*.%).


! +#%",-%.*./("

0*
 
1
2

333
2
### §9162. International negotiations

The Secretary of State, in cooperation with the Administrator and the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, shall seek effective international action and cooperation in support of the policy and purposes of this chapter and may initiate and conduct negotiations for the purpose of entering into international agreements designed to guarantee noninterference of ocean thermal energy conversion facilities and plantships with the thermal gradients used by other such facilities and plantships, to assure protection of such facilities and plantships and of navigational safety in the vicinity thereof, and to resolve such other matters relating to ocean thermal energy conversion facilities and plantships as need to be resolved in international agreements.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title IV, §402, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 998.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–320, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 974, known as the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
### §1527. Fish and wildlife conservation and development

The conservation and development of the fish and wildlife resources and the enhancement of recreation opportunities in connection with the project works authorized pursuant to this subchapter shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act (79 Stat. 213) [16 U.S.C. 460l–12 et seq.], except as provided in section 1522 of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title III, §308, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 893.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Water Project Recreation Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–72, July 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 213, which is classified principally to part C (§460l–12 et seq.) of subchapter LXIX of chapter 1 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 460l–12 of Title 16 and Tables.
§ 203.512 Free assumability; exceptions. ( a ) *Policy of free assumability with no restrictions.* A mortgagee shall not impose, agree to or enforce legal restrictions on conveyance, as defined in § 203.41(a)(3) of this part, or restrictions on assumption of the insured mortgage, unless specifically permitted by this part or contained in a junior lien granted to the mortgagee after settlement on the insured mortgage.
( b ) *Credit review.* If approval is required by the mortgage, the mortgagee shall not approve the sale or other transfer of all or part of the mortgaged property, or the sale or transfer of a beneficial interest in a trust owning all or part of the property, whether or not any person acquires personal liability under the mortgage in connection with the sale or other transfer, unless: ( 1 ) At least one of the persons acquiring ownership is determined to be creditworthy under applicable standards prescribed by the Secretary;
( 2 ) The selling mortgagor retains an ownership interest in the property; or
( 3 ) The transfer is by devise or descent.
( c ) *Investors and secondary residences.* The mortgagee shall not approve the sale of other transfer or mortgaged property to a person who cannot be approved as a substitute mortgagor as provided in § 203.258 of this part because the property will not be a primary residence or a secondary residence permitted by that section.
( d ) *Due-on-sale clause.* Each mortgage shall contain a due-on-sale clause permitting acceleration, in a form prescribed by the Secretary. If a sale or other transfer occurs without mortgagee approval and a prohibition in paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section applies, a mortgagee shall enforce this section by requesting approval from the Secretary to accelerate the mortgage, provided that acceleration is permitted by applicable law. The mortgagee shall accelerate if approval is granted. This paragraph applies only if the application by the mortgagor on a form approved by the Secretary is dated on or after December 1, 1986.
[58 FR 42649, Aug. 11, 1993; 59 FR 15112, Mar. 31, 1994]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

DEANDRE SPENCER COTTON,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-10171

D.C. No. 

2:15-cr-00094-LDG-VCF-1

District of Nevada, 

Las Vegas

ORDER

Before: D.W. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Judges D.W. Nelson and Bybee voted to grant the petition for panel 

rehearing and voted to vacate the memorandum disposition. Judge W. Fletcher

voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. 

Judge W. Fletcher voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges

D.W. Nelson and Bybee recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc

as moot.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The memorandum

disposition filed on September 28, 2020, is VACATED pending USA v.FigueroaBeltran, 16-10388, in this court. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as

moot. 

FILED

NOV 19 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
§ 311.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
### §2754. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 2754, originally enacted as section 124 of Pub. L. 88–452, was renumbered, repealed, and reenacted as section 444 of Pub. L. 89–329 and transferred to section 1087–54 of Title 20, Education.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\671\Judgment.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN ARNOLD,

Plaintiff,

    v.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OFAMERICA et al.,

Defendants.                                                                      /

No. C 09-0671 CRB

JUDGMENT

The Court, having granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants in part and in

favor of Plaintiff in part, enters Judgment in favor of Defendants in part and in favor of

Plaintiff in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 22, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB   Document 78   Filed 07/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-11T20:41:46-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
§ 1000.520 What are the purposes of HUD's review of the Annual Performance Report? HUD will review each recipient's Annual Performance Report when submitted to determine whether the recipient: ( a ) Has carried out its eligible activities in a timely manner, has carried out its eligible activities and certifications in accordance with the requirements and the primary objective of NAHASDA and with other applicable laws and has a continuing capacity to carry out those activities in a timely manner;
( b ) Has complied with the IHP of the grant beneficiary; and
( c ) Whether the Annual Performance Report of the recipient is accurate.
[63 FR 12349, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 71528, Dec. 3, 2012]
### §3796kk–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796kk–1 was editorially reclassified as section 10512 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2886

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacet-p-Anisidine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacet-p-Anisidine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACETOACET-P-ANISIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.10 Butanmide, N (4 

Methoxyphenyl) 3 Oxo (CAS 

No. 5437–98–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

2924.29.75) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2886 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ