alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 10), that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a meeting on Monday, February 7, 2005.

The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-420, Sec. 103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management and development of the park, including but not limited to the acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy.

The meeting will convene at park Headquarters, McFarland Hill, Bar Harbor, Maine, at 1 p.m. to consider the following agenda:

1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held September 13, 2004.

2. Committee reports:

—Land Conservation.

—Park Use.

—Science.

—Historic.

3. Old business.

4. Superintendent's report.

5. Public comments.

6. Proposed agenda for next Commission meeting, June 6, 2005.

The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting.

Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, tel: (207) 288-3338.

Dated: December 1, 2004.

Sheridan Steele,

Superintendent.

[FR Doc. 04-28290  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
### §375b. Disposal of tracts too small to be classed farm units

In accordance with the provisions of sections 375b to 375f of this title and notwithstanding the provisions of any other law, the Secretary of the Interior, hereinafter styled the Secretary, is authorized, in connection with any Federal irrigation project for which water is available, and after finding that such action will be in furtherance of the irrigation project and the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388), and Acts amendatory thereof or supplemental thereto, hereinafter styled the Reclamation Act, to dispose of any tract of withdrawn public land which, in the opinion of the Secretary, has less than sufficient acreage reasonably required for the support of a family and is too small to be opened to homestead entry and classed as a farm unit under the Reclamation Act.

(Mar. 31, 1950, ch. 78, §1, 64 Stat. 39.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 17, 1902, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.
exv10w17







Exhibit 10.17



Pursuant to an oral arrangement between Imperial Holdings, LLC and Warburg Investment Corporation
(“Warburg”), Mr. Tony Mitchell serves as the chief executive officer of Imperial Holdings, LLC and Imperial Holdings, LLC provides Warburg with
(i) office space; (ii) office equipment; and (iii) personnel. Imperial Holdings, LLC pays Warburg for Mr. Mitchell’s
service and Mr. Mitchell is paid by Warburg. Imperial Holdings, LLC has entered into a written
employment agreement with Mr. Mitchell that will become effective upon the closing of this
offering. At that time, the oral arrangement with Warburg will terminate.
An equal opportunity employer 1220 L Street, Northwest Russell White Washington, DC 20005-4070 Health Sciences Manager

Tel 202-682-8344

Fax 202-682-8270 whiter@api.org

January 7, 2014

Byron J. Bunker, Division Director Compliance Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality US Environmental Protection Agency

2000 Traverwood Drive Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation (Docket No. A-90-07): Report Amendment for HLS Study No. 00-6126 on Gasoline MTBE Vapor

Condensate

Dear Mr. Bunker:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the following information to EPA as par tial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

 Report Amendments for Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate Final Report: A 13- Week Whole-Body Inhalation Toxicity Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessments and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6126).

The Report Amendment does not change the data nor conclusions of the original final report (submitted 23 March 2011). The Report Amendment; 1) added cover pages to Volumes I to IV; 2) updated the neurobehavioral data on the positive cont rol in Appendix T; and 3) updated the Quality Assurance Statement to include the Report Amendment. The updated positive control data in Appendix T is now the same as was used for all the other 211(b) studies.

The Report Amendment is being submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Compliance Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e). If you require further information or have any questions regarding this submission, please

contact me.

Regards,

Russell D. White

Encl (1): Final Report including Report Amendments for Gasoline MTBE Vapor Condensate Final Report: A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Toxic ity Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity

Assessments and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxic ity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (HLS Study No. 00-6126).

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA
### §7322. Congressional review

(a) Each proposed Plan shall be referred to the appropriate committees in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

(b) Each such committee shall review the proposed Plan and, if it deems appropriate and necessary, report to the Senate or the House of Representatives legislation regarding such Plan which may contain such alternatives to, modifications of, or additions to the proposed Plan submitted by the President as the committee deems appropriate.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VIII, §802, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 611.)
#### COHEN, Appellant, v. STEELE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 20, 1903.)

Action by Morris Cohen against Sanford H. Steele, as executor. J. N. Miller, for appellant. C. H. Otis, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 29, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 29, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19I0080. CENTURION INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a A-LERT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES v. IVY SMITHWICK.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2017SC73 2016SCV167
SCWC

- 18

- 0000071

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB,

D/B/A CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE

FOR PRETIUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST,

Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

TERRENCE RYAN and LUCILLE RYAN,

Petitioners/Defendants

- Appellants,

and

FIRST LIGHT ENTERPRISES LLC; BLUE WATER ALLIANCE, LLC,

Respondents/Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEAL S

(CAAP

- 18

- 0000071; CAAP

- 18

- 0000312; CAAP

- 18

- 0000388;

CIV. NO. 5CC121000306 )

ORDER ACCEPT ING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Tonaki

, assigned by reason of vacancy )

Petitioner s / Defendants

- Appellants Terrence Ryan and

Lucille Ryan ’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July

6 , 2020, is hereby accepted

.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and p ursuant Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000071

02-SEP-2020

10:19 AMto Rule 34(c) of the Hawai  i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, September 2 , 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ John M. Tonaki

2
Exhibit 4.90

Date: 26 April 2006

Hutchison International Limited

22ndFloor, Hutchison House,

10 Harcourt Road,

Hong Kong

Attention: The Company Secretary



|Re: | IPR Framework Agreement dated 24thSeptember
2004 between Hutchison International Limited and Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited (the IPR Framework Agreement)
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We write to notify you that the following companies shall be deemed to be included as the Operating Companies (as such term was defined in the IPR Framework Agreement)
for the purpose of Clauses 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 3 and the Schedule of the IPR Framework Agreement with effect from the following dates respectively:-



|                                   |  |                  
|---------------------------------- |  | -----------------
|Operating companies                |  | Effective Date   
|PT Hutchison CP Telecommunications |  | 27thJuly 2005    
|BPL Mobile Cellular Limited        |  | 2ndJanuary 2006  
|3 Global Services Private Limited  |  | 21stFebruary 2006

Thank you for your kind attention.

Signed by :



|                                 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                                 |  |  |  | 
|Ting Y. Chan, Alternate Director |  |  |  | 
|For and on behalf of             |  |  |  | 

Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited
Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. * Not for P ublication in West's Fe deral Reporter 

# U nitedStates C ou rt o f App eal s

For th e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1246 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,
v . LARRY STALLINGS, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]
Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Farris and Boudin, Circuit Judges.

* Stephen Feldman with whom Feldman & Feldman was on brief for appellant. Do n a l dF e i t h , A s s i s t a n t U n i t e dS t a t e s A t t o r n e yw i t hw h om Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney, was on brief for appellee.
April 23, 2009-2- FARRIS, Circuit Judge . Larry Stallings alleges that the district court erred by admitting evidence of his prior w i re conviction because admitting the evidence violated both a New Hampshire district court local rule and Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404(b). We review applications of Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404(b) and district court local rules for abuse of discretion. United States v. Ofray-Campos, 534 F.3d 1, 35 (1st Ci r . 2 0 0 8 ) ; Crowe v. Bouduc, 334 F.3d 124, 134 (1st Cir. 2003); Crowley v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 361 F.3d 22, 25 (1st Cir. 2003).

The court admitted Stallings’s pri o r conviction in the interest of justice because it found 1) the government did not act in bad faith; 2) the evidence was highly pro b a t i ve; and 3) there was no unfair prejudice to Stallings as a result of the untimeliness. District courts have “broad latitude in administering local rules,” Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. Precision Valley Aviation, 26 F.3d 220, 224 (1 Cir. 1994), and they may choose to forgive a st party’s violation of a l o c a l rule. See United States v. DiazVillafone, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir. 1989). There was no abuse of discretion.

Stallings is incorrect that the district court’s admission of his prior wire fraud conviction violated Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404(b). Evidence of his prior conviction was offered to rebut Stallings’s claim that he was unaware that he was-3-

engaged in fraud. His prior conviction thus tended to prove intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake. Its admission did not violate Federal Rule of Evide n c e 404(b). “Only rarely—and in extraordinarily compelling circumstances—will [this court] reverse a district court’s on-the-spot judgment concerning the rel ative weighing of probative value and unfair effect.” United States v. Whitney, 524 F.3d 134, 141 (1st Cir. 2008). There was no abuse of discretion. AFFIRMED.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2987 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction for 

State and local income and property taxes under the alternative minimum 

tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

deduction for State and local income and property taxes 

under the alternative minimum tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL INCOME 

4 AND PROPERTY TAXES ALLOWED UNDER THE 

5 ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

7 56(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

8 to general limitation on deductions) is amended by strik-
2 

•HR 2987 IH 

1 ing ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (i) and by striking clause 

2 (ii) and inserting the following new clauses: 

3 ‘‘(ii) for any foreign real property 

4 taxes described in paragraph (1) of section 

5 164(a), or 

6 ‘‘(iii) for so much of paragraph (3) of 

7 section 164(a) as relates to foreign income, 

8 war profits, and excess profits taxes.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2004. 

Æ
#### § 180.650 Public document items.

Whenever a public document, such as an official report, decision, opinion, or published scientific or economic statistical data issued by any of the executive departments (or their subdivisions), legislative agencies or committees, or administrative agencies of the Federal Government (including Government-owned corporations), or a similar document issued by a State or its agencies is offered (in whole or in part), and such document (or part thereof) has been shown by the offeror to be reasonably available to the public, such document need not be produced or marked for identification, but may be offered for official notice, as a public document item by specifying the document or relevant part thereof.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert McLaurin, Appellant.

On remittur from the Court of Appeals, judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on December 16, 1975, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano and Birns, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 158 (Tuesday, August 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 50810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20807]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 29, 2011, at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
10th floor, MacCracken Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Renee Butner, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267- 5093; fax (202) 267-5075; e-mail 
Renee.Butner@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), we are giving notice of a 
meeting of the Executive Committee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory 
Committee taking place on September 29, 2011, at the Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20591. 
The Agenda includes:

1. Discussion of restructuring of ARAC
2. Status of Rulemaking Prioritization Working Group (RPWG)
3. Update on FAA response to Process Improvement Working Group (PIWG) 
recommendations
4. Status Report from FAA on ARAC Recommendations
5. Issue Area Status Reports from Assistant Chairs
6. Remarks from other EXCOM members

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the 
space available. The FAA will arrange teleconference service for 
individuals wishing to join in by teleconference if we receive notice 
by September 20. Arrangements to participate by teleconference can be 
made by contacting the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section. Callers outside the Washington metropolitan area are 
responsible for paying long-distance charges.
    The public must arrange by September 20 to present oral statements 
at the meeting. The public may present written statements to the 
executive committee by providing 25 copies to the Executive Director, 
or by bringing the copies to the meeting.
    If you are in need of assistance or require a reasonable 
accommodation for this meeting, please contact the person listed under 
the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 9, 2011.
Dennis Pratte,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2011-20807 Filed 8-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,951
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,412,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                   167,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,910,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,948,395
<PP&E>                                       1,386,215
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,182,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,333,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,292,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      2,161,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,161,721
<CGS>                                        1,624,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,624,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               554,697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (74,821)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (74,821)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (74,821)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .005    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .005
        

</TABLE>
### §§7831 to 7835. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–242, title I, §110(a), Mar. 22, 1984, 98 Stat. 101

Section 7831, Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §200, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1310, set out Congressional findings and declaration of policy in establishing a program for water research and development for saline and other impaired waters.

Section 7832, Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §201, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1310, set out functions of the Secretary.

Section 7833, Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §202, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1310, set out additional functions of the Secretary with regard to demonstrations and prototype plants, utilization of Federal expertise, and financial assistance from State or public agencies.

Section 7834, Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §203, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1311, authorized the Secretary to issue rules and regulations to carry out this subchapter.

Section 7835, Pub. L. 95–467, title II, §204, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1311, defined "saline and other impaired water", "United States", "pilot plant", "demonstration", and "prototype".

For similar provisions, see section 10301 et seq. of this title.
#### Vincent Tronolone, Respondent, v Praxair, Inc., Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[832 NYS2d 849]

Appeal from an order and *1146judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered March 30, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order and judgment, among other things, denied defendant’s posttrial motion seeking, inter alia, to set aside the verdict with respect to liability and damages and for judgment as a matter of law or, in the alternative, for a new trial.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,*155 AD2d 435 [1989]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Gorski, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.