DESCRIPTION OF THE TAX TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS 

ACT OF 2007, AS PASSED BY THE 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

Prepared by the Staff 

of the 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

December 18, 2007 

JCX-119-07 
i 

CONTENTS 

Page

INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1 

I. TAX TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS................................................................................... 2 

Amendment related to the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006..................................... 2 

Amendments related to Title XII of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 

(Provisions Relating to Exempt Organizations) .................................................................... 2 

Amendments related to the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 ......... 4 

Amendments related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity 

Act: A Legacy for Users ....................................................................................................... 6 

Amendments related to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ........................................................ 7 

Amendments related to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004......................................... 8 

Amendments related to the Economic Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ..... 11 

Amendments related to the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999 ........................................... 12 

Amendment related to the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act 

of 1998 ................................................................................................................................. 12 

Clerical corrections .............................................................................................................. 12 
1 

INTRODUCTION 

This document,1

 prepared by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, provides a 

description of the Tax Technical Corrections Act of 2007; this is a title of H. Res. 884, providing 

for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendments to H.R. 3997, with an amendment, 

as passed on December 18, 2007, by the House of Representatives. 

 1

 This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, Description of the Tax 

Technical Corrections Act of 2007, as Passed by the House of Representatives (JCX-119-07), 

December 18, 2007. This document can also be found on our website at www.house.gov/jct. 
2 

I. TAX TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS 

The bill includes technical corrections to recently enacted tax legislation. Except as 

otherwise provided, the amendments made by the technical corrections contained in the bill take 

effect as if included in the original legislation to which each amendment relates. 

Amendment related to the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006

Individuals with long-term unused credits under the alternative minimum tax (Act 

sec. 402 of Division A).–Under present law, an individual's minimum tax credit allowable for 

any taxable year beginning after December 20, 2006, and before January 1, 2013, is not less than 

the “AMT refundable credit amount.” The AMT refundable credit amount is the greater of (1) 

the lesser of $5,000 or the long-term unused minimum tax credit, or (2) 20 percent of the longterm unused minimum tax credit. The long-term unused minimum tax credit for any taxable year 

means the portion of the minimum tax credit attributable to the adjusted net minimum tax for 

taxable years before the 3rd taxable year immediately preceding the taxable year (assuming the 

credits are used on a first-in, first-out basis). In the case of an individual whose adjusted gross 

income for a taxable year exceeds the threshold amount (within the meaning of section 

151(d)(3)(C)), the AMT refundable credit amount is reduced by the applicable percentage 

(within the meaning of section 151(d)(3)(B)). The additional credit allowable by reason of this 

provision is refundable. 

The provision amends the definition of the AMT refundable credit amount. The 

provision provides that the AMT refundable credit amount (before any reduction by reason of 

adjusted gross income) is an amount (not in excess of the long-term unused minimum tax credit) 

equal to the greater of (1) $5,000, (2) 20 percent of the long-term unused minimum tax credit, or 

(3) the AMT refundable credit amount (if any) for the prior taxable year (before any reduction by 

reason of adjusted gross income). 

The provision may be illustrated by the following example: Assume an individual, 

whose adjusted gross income for all taxable years is less than the threshold amount, has a longterm unused minimum tax credit for 2007 of $100,000 and has no other minimum tax credits. 

The individual's AMT refundable credit amount under present law is $20,000 in 2007, $16,000 

in 2008, $10,240 in 2009, $8,192 in 2010, $6,554 in 2011, and $5,243 in 2012. Under the 

provision, the individual's AMT refundable credit amount is $20,000 for 2007 (as under present 

law), and in each of the taxable years 2008 thru 2011 the AMT refundable credit amount is also 

$20,000. The minimum tax credit in 2012 is zero. 

Amendments related to Title XII of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (Provisions Relating 

to Exempt Organizations)

Tax-free distributions from individual retirement plans for charitable purposes (Act 

sec. 1201).–Under the provision, when determining the portion of a distribution that would 

otherwise be includible in income, the otherwise includible amount is determined as if all 

amounts were distributed from all of the individual’s IRAs. 

Contributions of appreciated property by S corporations (Act sec. 1203).–Under 

present law (sec. 1366(d)), the amount of losses and deductions which a shareholder of an S 
3 

corporation may take into account in any taxable year is limited to the shareholder's adjusted 

basis in his stock and indebtedness of the corporation. The provision provides that this basis 

limitation does not apply to a contribution of appreciated property to the extent the shareholder's 

pro rata share of the contribution exceeds the shareholder's pro rata share of the adjusted basis of 

the property. Thus, the basis limitation of section 1366(d) does not apply to the amount of 

deductible appreciation in the contributed property. The provision does not apply to 

contributions made in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007. 

For example, assume that in taxable year 2007, an S corporation with one shareholder 

makes a charitable contribution of a capital asset held more than one year with an adjusted basis 

of $200 and a fair market value of $500. Assume the shareholder's adjusted basis of the stock (as 

determined under section 1366(d)(1)(A)) is $300. For purposes of applying the limitation under 

section 1366(d) to the contribution, the limitation does not apply to the $300 of appreciation and 

since the $300 adjusted basis of the stock exceeds the $200 adjusted basis of the contributed 

property, the limitation does not apply at all to the contribution. Thus, the shareholder is treated 

as making a $500 charitable contribution. The shareholder reduces the basis of the S corporation 

stock by $200 to $100 (pursuant to section 1367(a)(2)). 

 Recapture of tax benefit for charitable contributions of exempt use property not 

used for an exempt use (Act sec. 1215).–The Act permits a charitable deduction in the amount 

of the fair market value (not the donor's basis) for tangible personal property if an officer of the 

donee organization certifies upon disposition of the donated property that the use of the property 

was related to the purpose or function constituting the basis of the donee's tax-exempt status. It 

was not intended that the donee's use, though so related, not also be substantial. The provision 

adds to the certification requirement that the officer certify that use of the property by the donee 

was substantial. 

Contributions of fractional interests in tangible personal property (Act sec. 1218).–

The Act added an income tax provision providing for treatment of contributions of fractional 

interests in tangible personal property. A special valuation rule is provided under this rule that 

creates unintended consequences under the estate and gift tax. The provision therefore strikes 

the special valuation rule for estate and gift tax purposes. 

Time for assessment of penalty relating to substantial and gross valuation 

misstatements attributable to incorrect appraisals (Act section 1219).–Section 1219 of the 

Act added a penalty for substantial and gross valuation misstatements attributable to incorrect 

appraisals (Code sec. 6695A). First, the Act omitted to apply the penalty with respect to 

substantial valuation misstatements for estate and gift tax purposes, and the provision clarifies 

that the penalty applies for such purposes. Second, in the cross references for the penalty, the 

language of Code section 6696(d)(1), relating to the time period for assessment of the penalty, 

was not properly described. The provision adds a cross reference to section 6695A in section 

6696(d). 

Expansion of the base of tax on private foundation net investment income 

(Act sec. 1221).–The Act expands the base of the tax on net investment income of private 

foundations. The provision clarifies that capital gains from appreciation are included in this tax 

base. This clarification conforms the statutory language to the technical explanation. 
4 

Public disclosure of information relating to unrelated business income tax returns 

(Act sec. 1225).–The Act added a provision requiring that section 501(c)(3) organizations make 

publicly available their unrelated business income tax returns. However, as drafted, the 

requirement that, with respect to a Form 990, an organization make publicly available only the 

last three years of returns (sec. 6104(d)(2)) does not apply to disclosure of Form 990-T, because 

Form 990-T is required by section 6011, not by section 6033. The provision clarifies that the 3-

year limitation on making returns publicly available applies to Form 990-T. The provision 

clarifies that the IRS is required to make Form 990-T publicly available, subject to redaction 

procedures applicable to Form 990 under section 6104(b). 

Donor advised funds (Act 1231).–The Act imposed excise taxes in the event of certain 

taxable distributions (Code sec. 4966) and on the provision of certain prohibited benefits (sec. 

4967), but does not cross refer to these provisions in the section 4962 definition of qualified first 

tier taxes for purposes of tax abatement (though a cross reference to them is included in section 

4963). The provision adds a cross reference to them in Code section 4962 (relating to 

abatement). 

Excess benefit transactions involving supporting organizations (Act sec. 1242).–New 

Code section 4958(c)(3) provides that certain transactions involving supporting organizations are 

treated as excess benefit transactions for purposes of the intermediate sanctions rules. Under the 

Code, certain organizations described in Code sections 501(c)(4), (5) or (6) are treated as 

supported organizations, although they are not public charities or safety organizations. The 

provision provides that the excess benefit transaction rules of the Act generally do not apply to 

transactions between a supporting organization and its supported organization that is described in 

section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6). 

Amendments related to the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 

Look-through treatment and regulatory authority (Act sec. 103(b)).−Under the Act, 

for taxable years beginning after 2005 and before 2009, dividends, interest (including factoring 

income which is treated as equivalent to interest under sec. 954(c)(1)(E)), rents, and royalties 

received by one controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) from a related CFC are not treated as 

foreign personal holding company income to the extent attributable or properly allocable to nonsubpart F income of the payor (the “TIPRA look-through rule”). 

The provision clarifies the treatment of deficits in earnings and profits. Under the 

provision, the TIPRA look-through rule does not apply to any interest, rent, or royalty to the 

extent that such interest, rent, or royalty creates (or increases) a deficit which under section 

952(c) may reduce the subpart F income of the payor or another CFC. The provision parallels 

the rule applicable to interest, rents, or royalties that would otherwise qualify for exclusion from 

foreign personal holding company income under the “same country” exception (sec. 

954(c)(3)(B)). Thus interest, rents, and royalties will be treated as subpart F income, 

notwithstanding the general TIPRA look-through rule, if the payment creates or increases a 

deficit of the payor corporation and that deficit is from an activity that could reduce the payor’s 

subpart F income under the accumulated deficit rule (sec. 952(c)(1)(B)), or could reduce the 

income of a qualified chain member under the chain deficit rule (sec. 952(c)(1)(C)). For 

example, under the provision, items that do not qualify for the “same country” exception because 
5 

they meet the terms of section 954(c)(3)(B) will also not qualify under the TIPRA look-through 

rule. 

Modification of active business definition under section 355 (Act sec. 202).–The 

provision revises Code sections 355(b)(2)(A) and 355(b)(3) to reflect that the provision 

modifying the active business definition that was enacted by section 202 of the Act was made 

permanent by section 410 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006. Conforming 

amendments are made as a result of this change. 

The provision clarifies that if a corporation became a member of a separate affiliated 

group as a result of one or more transactions in which gain or loss was recognized in whole or in 

part, any trade or business conducted by such corporation (at the time that such corporation 

became such a member) is treated for purposes of section 355(b)(2) as acquired in a transaction 

in which gain or loss was recognized in whole or in part. Accordingly, such an acquisition is 

subject to the provisions of section 355(b)(2)(C), and may qualify as an expansion of an existing 

active trade or business conducted by the distributing corporation or the controlled corporation, 

as the case may be. 

The provision clarifies that the Treasury Department shall prescribe regulations that 

provide for the proper application of sections 355(b)(2)(B), (C), and (D) in the case of any 

corporation that is tested for active business under the separate affiliated group rule, and that 

modify the application of section 355(a)(3)(B) in the case of such a corporation in a manner 

consistent with the purposes of the provision. 

The provision further clarifies that the rule regarding the application of the new rules to 

determine the continued qualification under section 355 of a distribution that occurred before the 

effective date of the new rules, shall apply only if such application results in continued 

qualification and is not intended to require application of the new rules in a manner that would 

disqualify any distribution that satisfied the active business requirements of section 355 under 

prior law that was applicable to the distribution. 

Computation of tax for individuals with income excluded under the foreign earned 

income exclusion (Act sec. 515).–The provision clarifies that in computing the tentative 

minimum tax on nonexcluded income, the computation of tax is made before reduction for the 

alternative minimum tax foreign tax credit. This conforms the computation of the tentative 

minimum tax to the computation of the regular tax, so that both computations are made before 

the application of the foreign tax credit. 

The provision also corrects an error in present law in the case where a taxpayer has net 

capital gain in excess of taxable income. Under the provision, if a taxpayer’s net capital gain 

(within the meaning of section 1(h)) exceeds taxable income, in computing the tax on the taxable 

income as increased by the excluded income, the amount of net capital gain which otherwise be 

taken into account is reduced by the amount of that excess. The excess first reduces the amount 

of net capital gain without regard to qualified dividend income, and then qualified dividend 

income. Also, in computing adjusted net capital gain, unrecaptured section 1250 gain, and 28-

percent rate gain, the amount of the excess is treated in the same manner as an increase in the 

long-term capital loss carried to the taxable year. 
6 

Similar rules apply in computing the tentative minimum tax where a taxpayer’s net 

capital gain exceeds the taxable excess. 

The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006. 

The following examples illustrate the provision: 

Example 1.–For taxable year 2007, an unmarried individual has $80,000 excluded from 

gross income under section 911(a), $30,000 gain from the sale of a capital asset held more than 

one year, and $20,000 deductions. The taxpayer’s taxable income is $10,000. Under the 

provision, the regular tax is the excess of (i) the amount of tax computed under section 

911(f)(1)(A)(i) on taxable income of $90,000 ($10,000 taxable income plus $80,000 excluded 

income), over (ii) the amount of tax computed under section 911(f)(1)(A)(ii) on taxable income 

of $80,000 (excluded income). In applying section 1(h) to determine the tax under section 

911(f)(1)(A)(i), the net capital gain and the adjusted net capital gain are each $10,000. The 

regular tax is $1,500, which is equal to a tax at the rate of 15 percent on $10,000 of adjusted net 

capital gain.

Example 2.–For taxable year 2007, an unmarried individual has $90,000 excluded from 

gross income under section 911(a), $5,000 gain from the sale of a capital asset held more than 

one year, $25,000 unrecaptured section 1250 gain, and $20,000 deductions. The taxpayer’s 

taxable income is $10,000. Under the provision, the regular tax is the excess of (i) the amount of 

tax computed under section 911(f)(1)(A)(i) on taxable income of $100,000 ($10,000 taxable 

income plus $90,000 excluded income), over (ii) the amount of tax computed under section 

911(f)(1)(A)(ii) on taxable income of $90,000 (excluded income). In applying section 1(h) to 

determine the tax under section 911(f)(1)(A)(i), the net capital gain is $10,000. $5,000 is 

unrecaptured section 1250 gain ($25,000 less $20,000) and $5,000 is adjusted net capital gain. 

The regular tax is $2,000, which is equal to a tax at the rate of 15 percent on $5,000 of adjusted 

net capital gain and a tax at the rate of 25 percent on $5,000 of unrecaptured section 1250 gain. 

Amendments related to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity 

Act: A Legacy for Users

Timing of claims for excess alternative fuel (not in a mixture) credit (Act sec. 

11113).−Present law provides that the alternative fuel (not in a mixture) credit is refundable. 

Code section 6427(i)(3) permits claims to be filed on a weekly basis with respect to alcohol, 

biodiesel, and alternative fuel mixtures if certain requirements are met. This rule, however, does 

not refer to the alternative fuel credit (for alternative fuel not in a mixture). The provision 

clarifies that the same rules for filing claims with respect to fuel mixtures apply to the alternative 

fuel credit. 

Definition of alternative fuel (Act sec. 11113).−Code section 6426(d)(2) defines 

alternative fuel to include “liquid hydrocarbons from biomass” for purposes of the alternative 

fuel excise tax credit and payment provisions under sections 6426 and 6427. The statute does 

not define liquid hydrocarbons, which has led to questions as to whether it is permissible for 

such a fuel to contain other elements, such as oxygen, or whether the fuel must consist 

exclusively of hydrogen and carbon. It was intended that biomass fuels such as fish oil, which is 
7 

not exclusively made of hydrogen and carbon, qualify for the credit. The provision changes the 

reference in section 6426 from “liquid hydrocarbons” to “liquid fuel” for purposes of the 

alternative fuel excise tax credit and payment provisions. 

Amendments related to the Energy Policy Act of 2005

Credit for production from advanced nuclear power facilities (Act sec. 1306).−The 

provision clarifies that the national capacity limitation of 6,000 megawatts represents the total 

number of megawatts that the Secretary has authority to allocate under section 45J. 

Clarify limitation on the credit of installing alternative fuel refueling property 

(Act sec. 1342).−The present-law credit for qualified alternative fuel vehicle refueling property 

for a taxable year is limited to $30,000 per property subject to depreciation, and $1,000 for other 

property (sec. 30C(b)). The provision clarifies that the $30,000 and $1,000 limitations apply to 

all alternative fuel vehicle refueling property placed in service by the taxpayer at a location. The 

provision is consistent with similar deduction limitations imposed under section 179A(b)(2)(A) 

(relating to the deduction for clean-fuel vehicles and certain refueling property). 

In addition, Code section 30C(c)(1) provides that qualified alternative fuel vehicle 

refueling property has the meaning given to the term by section 179A(d). However, section 

179A(d) defines a different term. The provision modifies the language of section 30C(c)(1) to 

refer to the correct term. 

Clarify that research eligible for the energy research credit is qualified research 

(Act sec. 1351).−The energy research credit is available with respect to certain amounts paid or 

incurred to an energy research consortium. The provision clarifies that the credit is available 

with respect to such amounts paid or incurred to an energy research consortium provided they 

are used for energy research that is qualified research. 

Double taxation of rail and inland waterway fuel resulting from the use of dyed fuel 

on which the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund tax has already been 

imposed; off-highway business use (Act sec. 1362).−Section 4081(a)(2)(B) of the Code 

imposes tax at the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing tax rate of 0.1 cent 

per gallon on diesel fuel at the time it is removed from a terminal. Section 4082(a) provides that 

none of the generally applicable exemptions other than the exemption for export apply to this 

removal even if the fuel is dyed. When dyed fuel is used or sold for use in a diesel powered 

highway vehicle or train (sec. 4041), or such fuel is subject to the inland waterway tax (sec. 

4042), the Code inadvertently imposes the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund tax a 

second time. Section 6430 prohibits the refund of taxes imposed at the Leaking Underground 

Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate, except in the case of fuel destined for export. The 

provision eliminates the imposition of the 0.1 cent tax a second time if the Leaking Underground 

Storage Tank Trust Fund financing tax rate previously was imposed under section 4081. The 

provision permits a refund in the amount of the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund 

financing rate if such tax was imposed a second time under 4041 or 4042 from October 1, 2005 

through the date of enactment. The provision also clarifies that off-highway business use is not 

exempt from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund Financing rate. For 
8 

administrative reasons associated with collecting the tax, the off-highway business use 

clarification is effective for fuel sold for use or used after the date of enactment. 

Exemption from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate 

for aircraft and vessels engaged in foreign trade (Act sec. 1362).−Fuel supplied in the United 

States for use in aircraft engaged in foreign trade is exempt from U.S. customs duties and 

internal revenue taxes, so long as, where the aircraft is registered in a foreign State, the State of 

registry provides substantially reciprocal privileges for U.S.-registered aircraft. However, the 

Energy Policy Act of 2005 imposed, without exemption, the Leaking Underground Storage Tank 

Trust Fund financing rate on all taxable fuels, except in the case of export. As a result, aviation 

fuel is no longer exempt from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate. 

According to the State Department, almost all of the United States’ bilateral air services 

agreements contain provisions exempting from taxation all fuel supplied in the territory of one 

party for use in the aircraft of the other party. The United States has interpreted these provisions 

to prohibit the taxation, in any form, of aviation fuel supplied in the United States to the aircraft 

of airlines of the foreign countries that are parties to these air services agreements. The 

amendment provides that fuel for use in vessels (including civil aircraft) employed in foreign 

trade or trade between the United States and any of its possessions is exempt from the Leaking 

Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate. 

Amendments related to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004

Interaction of rules relating to credit for low sulfur diesel fuel (Act sec. 339).–Section 

45H of the Code allows a credit at the rate of 5 cents per gallon for low sulfur diesel fuel 

produced at certain small business refineries. The aggregate credit with respect to any refinery is 

limited to 25 percent of the costs of the type deductible under section 179B of the Code. Section 

179B allows a deduction for 75 percent of certain costs paid or incurred with respect to these 

refineries. The basis of the property is reduced by the amount of any credit determined with 

respect to any expenditure (sec. 45H(d)). Further, no deduction is allowed for the expenses 

otherwise allowable as a deduction in an amount equal to the amount of the credit under section 

45H (sec. 280C(d)). The interaction of these provisions is unclear, and the basis reduction and 

deduction denial rules may have an unintentionally duplicative effect. Under the provision, 

deductions are denied in an amount equal to the amount of the credit under section 45H, and the 

provisions of present law reducing basis and denying a deduction are repealed. 

Eliminate the open-loop biomass segregation requirement in section 45(c)(3)(A)(ii) 

(Act sec. 710).−For purposes of the credit for electricity produced from certain renewable 

resources, section 45(c)(3)(A)(ii) defines open-loop biomass to include any solid, nonhazardous, 

cellulosic waste material or any lignin material that is segregated from other waste materials, and 

that meets other requirements. The Act added municipal solid waste to the category of qualified 

energy resources giving rise to the credit. Thus, both open-loop biomass and municipal solid 

waste can be treated as qualified energy resources. The provision therefore strikes the 

requirement that open-loop biomass be segregated from other waste materials in order to be 

treated as qualified energy resources. 

Clarification of proportionate limitation applicable to closed-loop biomass 

(Act sec. 710).−Section 45(d)(2)(B)(ii) provides that when closed-loop biomass is co-fired with 
9 

other fuels, the credit is limited to the otherwise allowable credit multiplied by the ratio of the 

thermal content of the closed-loop biomass to the thermal content of all fuel used. This 

limitation duplicates a similar limitation in section 45(a), which provides that the credit is equal 

to 1.5 cents multiplied by the kilowatt hours of electricity produced by the taxpayer from 

qualified energy resources (and meeting other criteria). The present-law section 45(a) rule has 

the effect of limiting the credit (or duration of the credit) to the appropriate portion of the fuel 

that constitutes qualified energy resources, in the situations in which qualified energy resources 

are permitted to be co-fired with each other, or are permitted to be co-fired with other fuels. The 

provision clarifies that the limitation applies only once, not twice, to closed-loop biomass cofired with other fuels, by striking the duplicate limitation in section 45(d)(2)(B)(ii). 

Treatment of partnerships under the limitation on deductions allocable to property 

used by governments or other tax-exempt entities (Act sec. 848).−Code section 470 generally 

applies loss deferral rules in the case of property leased to tax-exempt entities. This rule applies 

with respect to tax-exempt use property, which for this purpose generally has the meaning given 

to the term by section 168(h) (with exceptions specified in section 470(c)(2)). The manner of 

application of section 470 in the case of property owned by a partnership in which a tax-exempt 

entity is a partner is unclear. 

The provision provides that tax-exempt use property does not include any property that 

would be tax-exempt use property solely by reason of section 168(h)(6). The provision refers to 

section 7701(e) for circumstances in which a partnership is treated as a lease to which section 

168(h) applies. Thus, if a partnership is recharacterized as a lease pursuant to section 7701(e), 

and a provision of section 168(h) (other than section 168(h)(6)) applies to cause the property 

characterized as leased to be treated as tax-exempt use property, then the loss deferral rules of 

section 470 apply. 

Under section 7701(e)(2), a partnership may be treated as a lease, taking into account all 

relevant factors, including factors similar to those set forth in section 7701(e)(1) (relating to 

service contracts treated as leases). In the case of property of a partnership in which a taxexempt entity is a partner, factors similar to those in section 7701(e)(1) (and in the legislative 

history of that section) that are relevant in determining whether a partnership is properly treated 

as a lease of property held by the partnership include (1) a tax-exempt partner maintains physical 

possession or control or holds the benefits and burdens of ownership with respect to such 

property, (2) there is insignificant equity investment by any taxable partner, (3) the transfer of 

such property to the partnership does not result in a change in use of such property, (4) such 

property is necessary for the provision of government services, (5) a disproportionately large 

portion of the deductions for depreciation with respect to such property are allocated to one or 

more taxable partners relative to such partner's risk of loss with respect to such property or to 

such partner's allocation of other partnership items, and (6) amounts payable on behalf of the taxexempt partner relating to the property are defeased or funded by set-asides or expected setasides. It is intended that Treasury regulations or guidance may provide additional factors that 

can be taken into account in determining whether a partnership with taxable and tax-exempt 

partners is an arrangement that resembles a lease of property under which section 470 defers the 

allowance of losses. 
10 

The provision is effective as if included in the provision of the American Jobs Creation 

Act of 2004 to which it relates. It is not intended that the provision supercede the rules set forth 

by the Treasury Department in Notice 2005-29, 2005-13 I.R.B. 796, Notice 2006-2, 2006-2 

I.R.B. 1, and Notice 2007-4, 2007-1 I.R.B. 260, with respect to the application of section 470 in 

the case of partnerships for taxable years of partnerships beginning in 2004, 2005, and 2006. 

These notices state that the Internal Revenue Service will not apply section 470 to disallow 

losses associated with property that is treated as tax-exempt use property solely as a result of the 

application of section 168(h)(6), and that abusive transactions involving partnerships an other 

pass-through entities remain subject to challenge by the Internal Revenue Service under other 

provisions of the tax law. Accordingly, for partnership taxable years beginning in 2004, 2005, 

and 2006, the Internal Revenue Service may apply section 470 to a partnership that would be 

treated as a lease under section 7701(e)(2). 

Treatment of losses on positions in identified straddles (Act sec. 888).–Under Code 

section 1092, the term “straddle” means offsetting positions in actively traded personal property. 

Generally, a loss on a position in a straddle may be recognized only to the extent the amount of 

the loss exceeds the unrecognized gain (if any) in offsetting positions in the straddle (sec. 

1092(a)(1)(A)). Special rules for identified straddles provide a different treatment of losses and 

also provide that any position that is not part of an identified straddle is not treated as offsetting 

with respect to any position that is part of the identified straddle. A taxpayer is permitted to treat 

a straddle as an identified straddle only if, among other requirements, the straddle is not part of a 

larger straddle. 

Before the enactment of the Act, the rules for treating a straddle as an identified straddle 

required that all the positions of the straddle were acquired on the same day and either that all of 

the positions were disposed of on the same day in a taxable year or that none of the positions 

were disposed of as of the close of the taxable year. A loss on a position in an identified straddle 

was not subject to the loss deferral rule described above but instead was taken into account when 

all the positions making up the straddle were disposed of. 

The Act changed the rules for identified straddles by providing, among other things, that 

if there is a loss on a position in an identified straddle, the loss is applied to increase the basis of 

the offsetting positions in that identified straddle. Under section 1092(a)(2)(A)(ii), the basis of 

each offsetting position in an identified straddle is increased by an amount that equals the 

product of the amount of the loss multiplied by the ratio of the amount of unrecognized straddle 

period gain in that offsetting position to the aggregate amount of unrecognized straddle period 

gain in all offsetting positions. The Act also provided that any loss described in section 

1092(a)(2)(A)(ii) is not otherwise taken into account for Federal tax purposes. 

The Act left unclear the treatment of a loss on a position in an identified straddle in at 

least two circumstances: first, when there are no offsetting positions in the identified straddle 

with unrecognized straddle period gain, and, second, when an offsetting position in the identified 

straddle is or has been a liability to the taxpayer. 

The provision addresses the treatment of losses in these two circumstances. In general, 

the provision reaffirms that a loss on a position in an identified straddle is not permitted to be 

recognized currently and also is not permanently disallowed. 
11 

The provision provides that if the application of section 1092(a)(2)(A)(ii) does not result 

in a basis increase in any offsetting position in the identified straddle (because there is no 

unrecognized straddle period gain in any offsetting position), the basis of each offsetting position 

in the identified straddle must be increased in a manner that (1) is reasonable, is consistent with 

the purposes of the identified straddle rules, and is consistently applied by the taxpayer, and (2) 

allocates to offsetting positions the full amount of the loss (but no more than the full amount of 

the loss). At the time a taxpayer adopts an allocation method under this rule, the taxpayer is 

expected to describe that method in its books and records. 

Under the provision, unless the Secretary of the Treasury provides otherwise, similar 

rules apply for purposes of the identified straddle rules when there is a loss on a position in an 

identified straddle and an offsetting position in the identified straddle is or has been a liability or 

an obligation (including, for instance, a debt obligation issued by the taxpayer, a written option, 

or a notional principal contract entered into by the taxpayer). Under this rule, if a taxpayer, for 

example, receives $1 to enter into a five-year short forward contract and the next day $100 of 

loss is allocated to that position, the resulting basis of the contract is $99. 

Under present law, a straddle is treated as an identified straddle only if, among other 

requirements, it is clearly identified on the taxpayer’s records as an identified straddle before the 

earlier of (1) the close of the day on which the straddle is acquired, or (2) a time that the 

Secretary of the Treasury may prescribe by regulations. The provision clarifies that for purposes 

of this identification requirement, a straddle is clearly identified only if the identification 

includes an identification of the positions in the straddle that are offsetting with respect to other 

positions in the straddle. Consequently, taxpayers are required to identify not only the positions 

that make up an identified straddle but also which positions in that identified straddle are 

offsetting with respect to one another. The offsetting positions identification requirement added 

by the provision is effective for straddles acquired after the date of enactment. 

The provision provides that regulations or other guidance prescribed by the Secretary for 

carrying out the purposes of the identified straddle rules may include the rules for the application 

of section 1092 to a position that is or has been a liability or an obligation. Regulations or other 

guidance also may include safe harbor basis allocation methods that satisfy the requirements that 

an allocation other than under section 1092(a)(2)(A)(ii) must be reasonable, consistent with the 

purposes of the identified straddle rules, and consistently applied by the taxpayer. 

Amendments related to the Economic Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001

Application of special elective deferral limit to designated Roth contributions (Act 

sec. 617).−Code section 402(g)(7) provides a special rule allowing certain employees to make 

additional elective deferrals to a tax-sheltered annuity, subject to (1) an annual limit of $3,000, 

and (2) a cumulative limit of $15,000 minus the amount of additional elective deferrals made in 

previous years under the special rule. Present law provides a rule to coordinate the cumulative 

limit with the ability to make designated Roth contributions, but inadvertently reduces the 

$15,000 amount by all designated Roth contributions made in previous years. The provision 

clarifies that the $15,000 amount is reduced only by additional designated Roth contributions 

made under the special rule. 
12 

Application of FICA taxes to designated Roth contributions (Act sec. 617).−Under 

Code section 3121(v)(1)(A), elective deferrals are included in wages for purposes of social 

security and Medicare taxes. The provision clarifies that wage treatment applies also to elective 

deferrals that are designated as Roth contributions. 

Amendments related to the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999

Renewable electricity sold to utilities under certain contracts (Act sec. 507).−Code 

section 45(e)(7) provides that a wind energy facility placed in service by the taxpayer after June 

30, 1999, does not qualify for the section 45 production tax credit if the electricity generated at 

the facility is sold to a utility pursuant to certain pre-1987 contracts. The provision clarifies that 

facilities placed in service prior to June 30, 1999, that sell electricity under applicable pre-1987 

contracts are not denied the section 45 production tax credit solely by reason of a change in 

ownership after June 30, 1999. 

Treatment of income and services provided by taxable REIT subsidiaries (Act 

sec. 542).–The provision clarifies that the transient basis language in the definition of a lodging 

facility applies only in determining whether an establishment other than a hotel or motel qualifies 

as a lodging facility. 

Amendment related to the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998

Redactions for background documents related to Chief Counsel Advice documents 

(Act sec. 3509).−The Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 

established a structured process by which the IRS makes certain work products, designated Chief 

Counsel advice (“CCA”), open to public inspection. To afford additional protection for certain 

governmental interests implicated by CCAs, section 6110(i)(3) governs redactions that may be 

made to CCAs, including the exemptions or exclusions available under the Freedom of 

Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) and (c) (except that the provision for redaction under a 

Federal statute excludes Title 26), as well as the exemptions pertaining to taxpayer identity 

information described in section 6110(c)(1). Section 6110(i)(3) does not expressly address 

redactions to the “background file documents” related to a CCA. The provision clarifies that the 

CCA background file documents are governed by the same redactions as CCAs. 

Clerical corrections

The bill includes a number of clerical and conforming amendments, including 

amendments correcting typographical errors.