alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.1540 Imminent harm notice of action.

The Board may issue an imminent harm notice of action to terminate a MAP lender, or to place a MAP lender on probation or suspension without advance notice to the MAP lender in those instances where the Board determines there exists a need to protect the financial interest of HUD from imminent harm. In all such instances, the Board shall notify the lender of the Board's decision promptly and give the reasons for the decision in accordance with § 200.1535(g)(2) and (3). The lender shall have the right to submit materials to the Board and to appear before the Board to seek prompt reconsideration of the Board's decision in accordance with the procedures of § 200.1535.
### §598. Salt River project, Arizona; sale of water power

Whenever a development of power is necessary for the irrigation of lands under the Salt River reclamation project, Arizona, or an opportunity is afforded for the development of power under said project, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized, giving preference to municipal purposes, to enter into contracts for a period not exceeding fifty years for the sale of any surplus power so developed, and the money derived from such sales shall be placed to the credit of said project for disposal as provided in the contract between the United States of America and the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, approved September 6, 1917: Provided, That no contract shall be made for the sale of such surplus power which will impair the efficiency of said project: Provided, however, That no such contract shall be made without the approval of the legally organized water-users' association or irrigation district which has contracted with the United States to repay the cost of said project: Provided further, That the charge for power may be readjusted at the end of five-, ten-, or twenty-year periods after the beginning of any contract for the sale of power in a manner to be described in the contract.

(Sept. 18, 1922, ch. 323, 42 Stat. 847.)
Form of Common Stock Certificates of the Registrant



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

 

  
 Exhibit 4.1

 COMMON STOCK 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS 
 OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE 
 The Telx Group, Inc. 
 COMMON STOCK 
 CUSIP 87973Q 10 2 

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 is the record holder of

 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.0001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF 

THE TELX GROUP, INC. 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 

This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 

Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

Dated: 
 TREASURER 
 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 
 (New York, NY) 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

 BY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 








 

 

  
 The Corporation
will furnish without charge to each shareholder who so requests, a summary of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock of the Corporation and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions of such preferences and rights, and the variations in rights, preferences and limitations determined for each series. Such request may be made to the office of the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation or to the Transfer
Agent 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM –
as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by the
entireties(Cust)(Minor) 
 JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of under Uniform Gifts to Minors 

survivorship and not as tenants Act 
 in common(State) 
 Additional abbreviations may
also be used though not in the above list. 
 For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 

Shares of Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

Attorney to transfer the said shares on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises. 
 Dated 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF 
 THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed 
 By 

THE SIGNATURES(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR 

INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND 

CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE 

MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. 

KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND
OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.
### §6992c. Inspections

#### (a) Requirements for access

For purposes of developing or assisting in the development of any regulation or report under this subchapter or enforcing any provision of this subchapter, any person who generates, stores, treats, transports, disposes of, or otherwise handles or has handled medical waste shall, upon request of any officer, employee, or representative of the Environmental Protection Agency duly designated by the Administrator, furnish information relating to such waste, including any tracking forms required to be maintained under section 6992b of this title, conduct monitoring or testing, and permit such person at all reasonable times to have access to, and to copy, all records relating to such waste. For such purposes, such officers, employees, or representatives are authorized to—

(1) enter at reasonable times any establishment or other place where medical wastes are or have been generated, stored, treated, disposed of, or transported from;

(2) conduct monitoring or testing; and

(3) inspect and obtain samples from any person of any such wastes and samples of any containers or labeling for such wastes.

#### (b) Procedures

Each inspection under this section shall be commenced and completed with reasonable promptness. If the officer, employee, or representative obtains any samples, prior to leaving the premises he shall give to the owner, operator, or agent in charge a receipt describing the sample obtained and, if requested, a portion of each such sample equal in volume or weight to the portion retained if giving such an equal portion is feasible. If any analysis is made of such samples, a copy of the results of such analysis shall be furnished promptly to the owner, operator, or agent in charge of the premises concerned.

#### (c) Availability to public

The provisions of section 6927(b) of this title shall apply to records, reports, and information obtained under this section in the same manner and to the same extent as such provisions apply to records, reports, and information obtained under section 6927 of this title.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §11004, as added Pub. L. 100–582, §2(a), Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2952.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7995

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

STEVEN RAY LOVIN, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (7:06-cr-00045-BO-3; 7:12-cv-00015-BO) 

Submitted: May 20, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Steven Ray Lovin, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III, Eric 

Evenson, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, J. Frank Bradsher, Joshua Bryan Royster, Seth Morgan 

Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Steven Ray Lovin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lovin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HARRY LAST and AMCS, INC.,

Plaintiffs, No. C 09-2193-EDL

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 

SECOND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

POOL COVER SPECIALIST NATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

Defendant Pool Cover Specialists National, Inc. (“PCSN”) has filed a Second Motion for Leave

to Supplement Invalidity Contentions based on recently discovered prior art. Plaintiffs do not oppose

the motion. The Court finds this motion suitable for decision without oral argument and the matter is

deemed submitted. For the reasons set forth in PCSN’s unopposed motion, the Court finds good cause

for GRANTING PCSN’s request for leave to supplement its invalidity contentions pursuant to Patent

Local Rule 3-6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 9, 2010 _______________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02193-EDL Document 48 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For IBM Corporation Securities,
Series 2004-7 (the "Trust"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
          Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
          of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
          respect of the Trust during the 2005 calendar year;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
          whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
          annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
          provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
          agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge, except
          as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has fulfilled its
          obligations under that agreement; and

     5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
          Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar standards
          based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
          after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
          Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as
          set forth in the trust agreement, that is included in these reports.

Date: March 30, 2006

By: /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
    -------------------------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President
#### § 26.55 Collection of civil penalties and assessments.

Collection of civil penalties and assessments shall be in accordance with applicable statutory provisions.
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF MICHAEL S. GILLILAND

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2006 (the "Report").

This
written statement accompanied the Report.

I,
Michael S. Gilliland, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|/s/MICHAEL S. GILLILANDMichael S. Gilliland
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 4, 2006 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### §1199. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 6, 1954, ch. 463, §2, 68 Stat. 452, which related to contract provisions for the condemnation of Sioux lands for the construction of the Fort Randall Dam, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 247.10 Inapplicability to substantial rehabilitation or demolition; right of disposition unimpaired.

This subpart shall not apply in any case in which HUD terminates the occupancy of a tenant as a direct result of a determination by HUD to substantially rehabilitate or demolish the project or to dispose of the project to a purchaser who purchases for the purpose of substantial rehabilitation or demolition. Nothing in this subpart should be construed to affect in any way the right of HUD to exercise its full statutory authority and discretion to dispose of property acquired pursuant to the National Housing Act.
§ 100.142 Types of information. ( a ) The privilege under this subpart covers: ( 1 ) The report or results of the self-test;
( 2 ) Data or factual information created by the self-test;
( 3 ) Workpapers, draft documents and final documents;
( 4 ) Analyses, opinions, and conclusions if they directly result from the self-test report or results.
( b ) The privilege does not cover: ( 1 ) Information about whether a lender conducted a self-test, the methodology used or scope of the self-test, the time period covered by the self-test or the dates it was conducted;
( 2 ) Loan files and application files, or other residential real estate-related lending transaction records (e.g., property appraisal reports, loan committee meeting minutes or other documents reflecting the basis for a decision to approve or deny a loan application, loan policies or procedures, underwriting standards, compensation records) and information or data derived from such files and records, even if such data has been aggregated, summarized or reorganized to facilitate analysis.
[62 FR 66432, Dec. 18, 1997]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsArgentina corn yield modelA model based on multiple regression was developed to estimate corn yields for the country of Argentina. A meteorological data set was obtained for the country by averaging data for stations within the corn-growing area. Predictor variables for the model were derived from monthly total precipitation, average monthly mean temperature, and average monthly maximum temperature. A trend variable was included for the years 1965 to 1980 since an increasing trend in yields due to technology was observed between these years.Document ID19840013855Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCallis, S. L.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Columbia, MO, United States)*Sakamoto, C.*(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Columbia, MO, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 16, 1984Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberYM-N4-04456E84-10105NAS 1.26:173374JSC-18908NASA-CR-173374Accession Number84N21923Funding Number(s)PROJECT: PROJ. AGRISTARSDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013855.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 26.13 Complaint. ( a ) *Respondent.* A complaint shall be served upon the party against whom an administrative action is taken, who shall be called the respondent.
( b ) *Grounds.* The complaint shall state the legal and factual grounds upon which the administrative action is based. The grounds set forth in the complaint may not contain allegations beyond the scope of the notice of administrative action or any amendment thereto.
( c ) *Notice of administrative action as complaint.* A notice of administrative action may serve as a complaint provided the notice states it is also a complaint and complies with paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Timing.* When the notice does not serve as a complaint, the complaint shall be served on or before the 30th day after the referral to a hearing officer or a request for hearing is made, or within any other time period designated by the hearing officer.
J AMES F. M ARTENS *

K ELLI H. T ODD

L ACY L. L EONARD

───────────────── Attorneys at Law

───────────────── 

### M ARTENS



### , T ODD



### , L EONARD



### , T AYLOR 

### & A HLRICH

A G ENERAL P ARTNERSHIP

─────────────────────────────── 301 C ONGRESS A VENUE

, S UITE 1950

A USTIN

, T EXAS 78701

(512) 542

- 9898

FAX (512) 542

- 9899

www.textaxlaw.com A MANDA G. T AYLOR ‡

D ANIELLE V. A HLRICH

K ATIE M. W OLTERS

───────────────── Attorneys at Law

─────────────────

*Board Certified in Tax Law ‡ Board Certified in Appellate Law

Texas Board of Legal Specialization Texas Board of Legal Specialization

June 20, 2016

Via Electronic Filing

Court of Appeals, Third District of Texas

Attn: Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk

Price Daniel Sr. Building

209 West 14th Street, Room 101

Aust in, Texas 78701

Re: 03-16-00131- CV , Mary Louise Serafine, Appellant v. Alexander Blunt;

Ashley Blunt; Scott Lockhart; Austin Drainage and Foundation, LLC

d/b/a Austin Drainage and Landscape Development; Viking Fence

Company, Ltd.; and Viking GP, LLC, Appellees

Dear Mr. Kyle :

I will be out of the office beginning Monday, September 19, 2016 through Fri day,

October 7 , 2016, for prepaid travel out of the country . Accordingly, I would appreciate it if you

would not schedule anything relat ing to this case during the days that I am out of this office.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. ACCEPTED

03-16-00131-CV

11234617

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

6/20/2016 3:19:21 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKRespectfully submitted

,

MARTENS, TODD, LEONARD, TAYLOR & AHLRICH

By: /s/ Amanda G. Taylor

Amanda G. Taylor

State Bar No. 24045921

301 Congress Ave., Suite 1950

Austin, Texas 78701

Telephone: (512) 542

- 9898

ataylor@textaxlaw.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE S

ALEXANDER AND ASHLEY BLUNT

cc: Via E

- service to:

Mary Louise Serafine ( mlserafine@gmail.com )

Ronald M. Raydon ( ron@raydonlaw.com )

Sara B. Churchin ( schurchin@thompsoncoe.com )

Wade C. Crosnoe ( wcrosnoe@thompsoncoe.com )
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00060-CV

IN RE JANA BOOTH

Original Proceeding

ORDER

Relator has filed a “joint or unopposed motion to dissolve temporary stay,” 

asserting that ongoing events that have occurred since the parties’ unsuccessful 

mediation necessitate the need to file an “emergency motion and/or request for a 

temporary restraining order.”1 The motion asserts that the “events ..., if true, raise 

serious and immediate questions that need consideration by the trial court.” 

The motion is granted in part. The stay of all proceedings in the trial court is lifted, 

except that the trial court is stayed from entering a final judgment in the case below until 

further order of this Court.

 

1 The motion also states that this recent issue may render this original proceeding moot.
In re Booth Page 2

If at any point the alleged emergency proceedings render moot this original 

proceeding, Relator’s counsel is ordered to immediately advise the Court of that fact in 

writing.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Order issued and filed May 9, 2016

Do not publish
Case 3:09-cv-01971-EMC Document 35 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01971-EMC Document 35 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01971-EMC Document 35 Filed 02/23/10 Page 3 of 3