alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAPITAL TRUST, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WALTER R. LEMBI, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-02492 JSW

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The Court has received and considered the parties Joint Case Management Conference

Statement. The Court appreciates the parties’ efforts to resolve this matter short of trial. At this

time, the Court will not vacate the trial date. It shall, however, continue the case management

conference set for April 2, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. to May 14, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall

submit a further Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before May 7, 2010,

which shall include an update on the progress of the parties’ settlement efforts. If the parties

wish to vacate or continue the pretrial and trial dates at that time, they shall submit a separate

request to the Court on May 7, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02492-JSW Document 75 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1
### Database for the geologic map of the Sauk River 30-minute by 60-minute quadrangle, Washington (I-2592)

By: R. W. TaborD. B. BoothJ.A. VanceA. B. Ford

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds188

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Metadata:  **Metadata**                            (txt)
- Spatial Data:  **Spatial Data**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3026 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3026

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-methyl-4-methoxy-6-methylamino-
                            1,3,5-triazine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2005

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-methyl-4-methoxy-6-methylamino-
                            1,3,5-triazine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-4-METHOXY-6-METHYLAMINO-1,3,5-TRIAZINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.08.03       2-methyl-4-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         methoxy-6-                                                         31/2009
                         methylamino-1,3,5-
                         triazine (CAS No.
                         5248-39-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.69.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Rubel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Arc Communications
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to myself and others,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal controls
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: April 9, 2004


/s/ Michael Rubel
-----------------------
Michael Rubel, principal financial officer
§ 214.205 Appeals. An agency making an application for approval, or an approved agency seeking reapproval, shall have the right to appeal any adverse decisions rendered by HUD under this part: ( a ) *Appeal must be in writing.* An agency may make a formal written appeal to HUD.
( b ) *Timeliness.* HUD must receive an appeal within 30 days of the date of the HUD decision letter to the applicant agency. HUD is not bound to review appeals received after this 30-calendar day period.
( c ) *Other action.* Nothing in this section prohibits HUD from taking such other action against an agency as provided in 24 CFR part 24, or from seeking any other remedy against an agency available to HUD by statute or otherwise.
### Archive of digital boomer seismic reflection data collected during USGS field activities 95LCA03 and 96LCA02 in the Peace River of West-Central Florida, 1995 and 1996

By: Karynna CalderonShawn V. DadismanAnn B. TihanskyBill R. LewellingJames G. Flocks**Dana S. WieseJack L. KindingerArnell S. Harrison**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds217

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

In October and November of 1995 and February of 1996, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Southwest Florida Water Management District, conducted geophysical surveys of the Peace River in west-central Florida from east of Bartow to west of Arcadia. This report serves as an archive of unprocessed digital boomer seismic reflection data, trackline maps, navigation files, GIS files, Field Activity Collection System (FACS) logs, observers' logbooks, and formal FGDC metadata. Filtered and gained digital images of the seismic profiles are also provided. Refer to the Acronyms page for expansion of acronyms and abbreviations used in this report.

The archived trace data are in standard Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG) SEG-Y format (Barry and others, 1975) and may be downloaded and processed with commercial or public domain software such as Seismic Unix (SU). Example SU processing scripts and USGS software for viewing the SEG-Y files (Zihlman, 1992) are also provided.
#### William D. Lunney, Appellant-Respondent, v. Dover Garage, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Order, dated June 25, 1959, setting aside a verdict for $35,000 in favor of plaintiff on the ground of excessiveness and ordering a new trial, and denying defendant’s motions to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the defendants-respondents-appellants. The time specified by the Trial Term in which the plaintiff might stipulate to a reduction of the verdict having passed, such time is not extended, and it follows that the verdict stands set aside as excessive unconditionally. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

ELIZABETH KARNAZES,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO and DEBORAH

TITONE,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-0767 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ORDER

TO SHOW CAUSE

Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for an order to show cause. (Dkt. #72.) In

their motion, Defendants request that the Court issue an order for Mark Heitner, M.D., to show

cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to appear at his noticed deposition. The

Court is now in receipt of Plaintiff’s opposition thereto, in which she provides Dr. Heitner’s

declaration in response. (Dkt. #86.) From his declaration, it appears that Dr. Heitner believes that

an order to show cause has already issued. However, the purpose of Defendants’ motion is for the

Court to determine whether such an order should be issued. Accordingly, Dr. Heitner need not

appear at the July 1, 2010 hearing. If the Court determines that an order to show cause should be

issued, Dr. Heitner shall be ordered to appear before the Court at that time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2010

_______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-00767-MMC Document 87 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 206.133 Termination of insurance contract. ( a ) *Payment of the mortgage.* The contract of insurance shall be terminated if the mortgage is paid in full.
( b ) *Acquisition of title.* ( 1 ) If the mortgagee or a party other than the mortgagee acquires title at a foreclosure sale, or the mortgagee acquires title by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, and the mortgagee notifies the Commissioner that a claim for the payment of the insurance benefits will not be presented, the contract of insurance shall be terminated.
( 2 ) For HECMs with Case Numbers assigned on or after September 19, 2017, if the mortgagee or a party other than the mortgagee acquires title at a foreclosure sale or the mortgagee acquires title by a deed in lieu of foreclosure and a claim for the payment of the insurance benefits will be presented, the contract of insurance shall be terminated as of claim payment.
( c ) *Mortgagee fails to make payments.* If the mortgagee fails to make the payments to the borrower as required under the mortgage, and does not reimburse the Commissioner or assign the mortgage to the Commissioner within 30 days from the demand by the Commissioner for reimbursement or assignment, the contract of insurance shall automatically terminate. The Commissioner may later reinstate the contract of insurance, which shall continue in force as if no termination had occurred, upon reimbursement with interest as provided in § 206.121. Upon reinstatement, the mortgagee shall be liable for all MIP which would have been due if no termination had occurred, including late charge and interest as provided in § 206.113.
( d ) *Notice of termination.* The mortgagee shall give written notice to the Commissioner, or other notice acceptable to the Commissioner, within 15 days of the occurrence of an event under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. No contract of insurance shall be terminated under paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section unless such notice is given.
( e ) *Voluntary termination.* The mortgagor and the mortgagee may jointly request the Commissioner to approve the voluntary termination of the mortgage insurance contract. Prior to approval, the Commissioner shall make certain that the borrower is aware of the consequences which could arise out of the voluntary termination of the contract of insurance. The mortgagee shall cancel the insurance endorsement on the Mortgage Insurance Certificate or Note upon receipt of notice from the Commissioner that the contract of insurance is terminated. Notwithstanding any provision in a mortgage instrument, there shall be no voluntary termination charge due the Commissioner on account of the voluntary termination of any mortgage insurance contract where the request for termination is received by the Commissioner.
( f ) *Effect of termination.* When the insurance contract is terminated, all rights of the mortgagee shall terminate, including the right to file a claim for insurance benefits. All obligations of the Commissioner shall also cease immediately.
### §9858d. Limitations on State allotments

#### (a) No entitlement to contract or grant

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed—

(1) to entitle any child care provider or recipient of a child care certificate to any contract, grant or benefit; or

(2) to limit the right of any State to impose additional limitations or conditions on contracts or grants funded under this subchapter.

#### (b) Construction of facilities

#### (1) In general

Except as provided for in section 9858m(c)(6) of this title, no funds made available under this subchapter shall be expended for the purchase or improvement of land, or for the purchase, construction, or permanent improvement (other than minor remodeling) of any building or facility.

#### (2) Sectarian agency or organization

In the case of a sectarian agency or organization, no funds made available under this subchapter may be used for the purposes described in paragraph (1) except to the extent that renovation or repair is necessary to bring the facility of such agency or organization into compliance with health and safety requirements referred to in section 9858c(c)(2)(I) of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §658F, as added Pub. L. 101–508, title V, §5082(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1388–240; amended Pub. L. 102–401, §3(a), Oct. 7, 1992, 106 Stat. 1959; Pub. L. 102–586, §8(c)(1), Nov. 4, 1992, 106 Stat. 5036; Pub. L. 104–193, title VI, §606, Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2283; Pub. L. 113–186, §5(c), Nov. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 1987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 113–186 substituted "section 9858c(c)(2)(I)" for "section 9858c(c)(2)(F)".

1996—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–193 substituted "Except as provided for in section 9858m(c)(6) of this title, no funds" for "No funds".

1992—Pub. L. 102–401 and Pub. L. 102–586 made identical technical corrections to directory language of Pub. L. 101–508, §5082(2), which added this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–193 effective Oct. 1, 1996, see section 615 of Pub. L. 104–193, set out as a note under section 9858 of this title.
- 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION RE: CONTINUING BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (09-CV-01551 JSW) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PETER M. HART (State Bar No. 198691) 

LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART 

13952 Bora Bora Way, F-320 

Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 

Telephone: (310) 478-5789 

Facsimile: (509) 561-6441 

hartpeter@msn.com

LARRY W. LEE (State Bar No. 228175) 

DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation 

444 S. Flower Street, Suite 1370 

Los Angeles, California 90071 

Telephone: (213) 488-6555 

Facsimile: (213) 488-6554 

lwlee@diversitylaw.com

KENNETH H. YOON (State Bar No. 198443) 

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH H. YOON 

One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

Telephone: (213) 612-0988 

Facsimile: (213) 947-1211 

kyoon@yoon-law.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Taina Napoto aka Amanita Naupoto 

RAO TILIAKOS LLP 

Anthony J. Rao (SBN 173512) 

arao@rao-ongaro.com

90 Park Avenue, 18th Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Telephone: (212) 455-9255 

Facsimile: (212) 297-0005 

Attorneys for Defendants Danzas 

Corporation and Exel Global Logistics, Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

TAINA NAPOTO, as an individual and on 

behalf of others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DANZAS CORPORATION, an Ohio 

corporation, and EXEL GLOBAL 

LOGISTICS, INC., a New York Corporation 

and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: 09-CV-01551 JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION

RE: CONTINUING BRIEFING ON

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS

CERTIFICATION 

Case3:09-cv-01551-JSW Document49-1 Filed02/11/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-01551-JL Document 50 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION RE: CONTINUING BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (09-CV-01551 JSW) 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING the Court orders that the present briefing schedule for 

the class certification motion be continued three (3) months to the following: 

Matter Prior Date New Date 

Plaintiff’s Opening Brief 6/30/10 9/30/10 

Defendants’ Opposition and Cross 7/30/10 11/1/10 

Plaintiff’s Opposition and Reply 8/30/10 11/30/10 

Defendants’ Reply 9/13/10 12/13/10 

Hearing Friday, 10/8/10, 9:00 am Friday, 1/7/11, 9:00 am 

Dated: _______________, 2010 

 ___________________________________________ 

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

United States District Court Judge 

Case3:09-cv-01551-JSW Document49-1 Filed02/11/10 Page2 of 2

February 12

Case 3:09-cv-01551-JL Document 50 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 2
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 15, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A1862. NATHANIEL ROBERTS, JR. v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On May 22, 2019, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than May 31, 2019. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 15, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.