alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-406 (Consolidated Advisory Opinion and 
Enforcement Proceedings)]


In the Matter of Certain Lens-Fitted Film Packages; Order

    On October 7, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the 
Federal Circuit issued two decisions in appeals stemming from the 
above-captioned proceedings, VastFame Camera, Ltd., et al. v. U.S. 
Int'l Trade Com'n, 386 F.3d 1108 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (``VastFame'') and 
Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., et al. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Com'n, 386 F.3d 
1095 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (``Fuji''). The mandates issued in these cases on 
November 29, 2004. In VastFame, the Court reversed the Commission's 
decision to refuse to allow an importer who had not been a respondent 
in the original investigation to raise the defense of patent invalidity 
in the Commission's enforcement proceedings, vacated the enforcement 
decision, and remanded the case for proceedings consistent with its 
Opinion. In Fuji, the Court affirmed the majority of the Commission's 
determinations at issue, but vacated and remanded the Commission's 
infringement decision as to one asserted claim for redetermination of 
the infringement issue using a claim construction supplied by the 
Court.
    It is hereby ordered that:
    1. This investigation be remanded to Administrative Law Judge Paul 
J. Luckern in order that he may conduct such further proceedings as may 
be necessary to carry out the mandates of the Court and conclude the 
proceedings.
    2. The presiding administrative law judge shall issue an initial 
determination in which he shall determine:
    a. Whether claim 15 of U.S. Patent No. 4,884,087 is invalid;
    b. Whether any of the respondents' accused disposable cameras 
imported into or sold in the United States infringe claim 1 of U.S. 
Patent No. 4,972,649 under the Federal Circuit's claim construction; 
and
    c. Whether there are, in light of the determinations made in 
accordance with paragraph b. above, any further violations of section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
    3. The presiding administrative law judge may, in his discretion, 
reopen the evidentiary record to the extent necessary to resolve any 
new factual questions presented by the Court's opinion. His ID will be 
processed by the Commission in accordance with Commission Rules 
210.42(h)(2) and 210.43-210.45, 19 CFR 210.42(h)(2) and 210.43-210.45.
    4. In the event that the presiding administrative law judge 
determines that there have been additional violations of section 337 of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, he shall issue a recommended determination on 
whether any further enforcement measures are necessary.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 21, 2004.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-28339 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### §7424. Assurance of adequacy of State plans

#### (a) State review of implementation plans which relate to major fuel burning sources

As expeditiously as practicable but not later than one year after August 7, 1977, each State shall review the provisions of its implementation plan which relate to major fuel burning sources and shall determine—

(1) the extent to which compliance with requirements of such plan is dependent upon the use by major fuel burning stationary sources of petroleum products or natural gas,

(2) the extent to which such plan may reasonably be anticipated to be inadequate to meet the requirements of this chapter in such State on a reliable and long-term basis by reason of its dependence upon the use of such fuels, and

(3) the extent to which compliance with the requirements of such plan is dependent upon use of coal or coal derivatives which is not locally or regionally available.

Each State shall submit the results of its review and its determination under this paragraph to the Administrator promptly upon completion thereof.

#### (b) Plan revision

(1) Not later than eighteen months after August 7, 1977, the Administrator shall review the submissions of the States under subsection (a) and shall require each State to revise its plan if, in the judgment of the Administrator, such plan revision is necessary to assure that such plan will be adequate to assure compliance with the requirements of this chapter in such State on a reliable and long-term basis, taking into account the actual or potential prohibitions on use of petroleum products or natural gas, or both, under any other authority of law.

(2) Before requiring a plan revision under this subsection, with respect to any State the Administrator shall take into account the report of the review conducted by such State under paragraph (1) and shall consult with the Governor of the State respecting such required revision.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §124, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §122, Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 722.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 7, 1977, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 406(d) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Wesley Wright v. Milton Klein, as Warden, Bronx County House of Detention.

Motion to withdraw appeal granted and the appeal taken by relator-appellant from the order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on January 25, 1962 is withdrawn. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:11:07-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §1718. Documents of conveyance; terms, covenants, etc.

The Secretary shall issue all patents or other documents of conveyance after any disposal authorized by this Act. The Secretary shall insert in any such patent or other document of conveyance he issues, except in the case of land exchanges, for which the provisions of subsection 1716(b) of this title shall apply, such terms, covenants, conditions, and reservations as he deems necessary to insure proper land use and protection of the public interest: Provided, That a conveyance of lands by the Secretary, subject to such terms, covenants, conditions, and reservations, shall not exempt the grantee from compliance with applicable Federal or State law or State land use plans: Provided further, That the Secretary shall not make conveyances of public lands containing terms and conditions which would, at the time of the conveyance, constitute a violation of any law or regulation pursuant to State and local land use plans, or programs.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title II, §208, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2757.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 94–579, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2743, known as the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/11/2012 07:41 PM

Subject: RE: EO 12866 review

- NESHAP Portland Cement

Hi Sharon and Keith,

Attached are int eragency comments on the latest draft of the rule. Let’s talk about these tomorrow.

Regards,

Cortney

(See attached file: EO_12866_NESHAP_FOR_THE_PORTLAND_CEMENT_S_2060

- AQ93_20120611

InteragencyCommentsunderEO13563.docx)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2925 

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 

to extend the authority for drought assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005 

Mr. HINOJOSA (for himself, Mr. OTTER, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. DOGGETT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief 

Act of 1991 to extend the authority for drought assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE RECLAMATION STATES 

4 EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF ACT OF 1991. 

5 Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States Emergency 

6 Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amend7 ed by striking ‘‘September 30, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep8 tember 30, 2010’’. 

Æ
### §3057c. Eligibility

#### (a) Criteria

A tribal organization of an Indian tribe is eligible for assistance under this part only if—

(1) the tribal organization represents at least 50 individuals who are 60 years of age or older; and

(2) the tribal organization demonstrates the ability to deliver supportive services, including nutritional services.

#### (b) Limitation

An Indian tribe represented by an organization specified in subsection (a) shall be eligible for only one grant under this part for any fiscal year. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude an Indian tribe represented by an organization specified in subsection (a) from receiving a grant under section 3057k–11 of this title.

#### (c) "Indian tribe" and "tribal organization" defined

For the purposes of this part the terms "Indian tribe" and "tribal organization" have the same meaning as in section 5304 of title 25.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title VI, §612, as added Pub. L. 100–175, title I, §171, Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 959; amended Pub. L. 106–501, title VI, §601, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2287.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3057c, Pub. L. 89–73, title VI, §604, as added Pub. L. 95–478, title I, §106, Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1549; amended Pub. L. 97–115, §13(b), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1608; Pub. L. 98–459, title VI, §602, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1788, related to applications for assistance, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–175. See section 3057e of this title.

#### Amendments

2000—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 106–501 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1987, except not applicable with respect to any area plan submitted under section 3026(a) of this title or any State plan submitted under section 3027(a) of this title and approved for any fiscal year beginning before Nov. 29, 1987, see section 701(a), (b) of Pub. L. 100–175, set out as an Effective Date of 1987 Amendment note under section 3001 of this title.
(February *23,*1961)

#### William F. Reiber, Appellant, v. Walter F. Roberts, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: When the deed in controversy was executed and acknowledged by the grantors, the only grantees named therein were the plaintiff and his wife (since deceased). Subsequently, at the time of the closing of the transaction at the County Clerk’s office, the name of the defendant, a son of the plaintiff’s wife by a former marriage, was added as a grantee and the words “ as joint tenants, with the right of survivorship ” were also added. The plaintiff contended upon the trial that the additions were made without his consent. But the proof established that the plaintiff was personally present and gave his consent to the addition of his stepson’s name as one of the grantees. It appeared, however, that the grantors had left the County Clerk’s office before the addition was made. There was proof that their attorney was present and that he expressly consented to the change, stating that it was immaterial to his clients whether any grantees were added. It is questionable, however, whether this consent was within the scope of the implied authority of the attorney, and there was no proof of express authority. This question should be inquired into upon a new trial. We do not, at this time, pass upon the question of whether the authority of the attorney was required to be in writing under the Statute of Frauds. We note that no rights of third parties are involved and that the controversy arises only as between the parties to the conveyance. (Appeal from judgment and order of Monroe Equity Term dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in an action to reform a deed. The order granted plaintiff’s motion for permission to enter judgment on failure of defendant to enter same.) Present—Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40885

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR HUGO MORALES-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-01-CR-156-ALL

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor

Hugo Morales-Mendoza has filed a brief and motion to withdraw

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Morales

received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

  <ARTICLE> 5
  <LEGEND>
  THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
  UNIFRAX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS
  OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THEIR  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
  THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
  </LEGEND>
  <MULTIPLIER> 1,000

  <S>                                                         <C>
  <PERIOD-TYPE>                                               3-MOS
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-2000
  <PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-2000
  <PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-2000
  <CASH>                                                                0
  <SECURITIES>                                                          0
  <RECEIVABLES>                                                    16,264
  <ALLOWANCES>                                                        583
  <INVENTORY>                                                       9,259
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 28,026
  <PP&E>                                                           77,284
  <DEPRECIATION>                                                   41,855
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   84,001
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            16,595
  <BONDS>                                                          99,000
  <COMMON>                                                              0
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
  <PREFERRED>                                                           0
  <OTHER-SE>                                                      (35,147)
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     84,001
  <SALES>                                                          23,994
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 23,994
  <CGS>                                                            11,336
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    11,336
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    101
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                2,668
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   3,561
  <INCOME-TAX>                                                      1,237
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               2,324
  <DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
  <CHANGES>                                                             0
  <NET-INCOME>                                                      2,324
  <EPS-BASIC>                                                           0
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0


</TABLE>
#### § 247.7 Implementation.

Every rental agreement entered into or renewed on and after the date on which this subpart is applicable to such tenant shall contain appropriate provisions implementing this subpart.
Case 3:09-cv-01824-WHA Document 32 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-01824-WHA Document29 Filed02/17/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01824-WHA Document 32 Filed 02/19/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-01824-WHA Document29 Filed02/17/10 Page2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01824-WHA Document 32 Filed 02/19/10 Page 3 of 3 Case3:09-cv-01824-WHA Document29 Filed02/17/10 Page3 of 3
#### § 203.38 Location of dwelling.

At the time a mortgage is insured there must be located on the mortgaged property one or more dwellings designed principally for residential use for not more than four families.

[61 FR 36264, July 9, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5                                                   Exhibit 27
<LEGEND>                    TIME WARNER INC.
                        FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements of Time Warner Inc. for the three months ended
March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            544
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                      940
<INVENTORY>                                     2,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,759
<PP&E>                                          3,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 32,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,943
<BONDS>                                        10,640
<COMMON>                                            6
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,858
<PREFERRED>                                         3
<OTHER-SE>                                      9,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   32,328
<SALES>                                         3,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,137
<CGS>                                           1,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (25)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (62)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (62)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)
        


</TABLE>
§ 401.13 Copies required. ( a ) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, two duplicate originals and fifty copies of the application and of any supplemental application, statement in response, supplemental statement in response, statement in reply and supplemental statement in reply shall be delivered to either secretary. On receipt of such documents, the secretary shall forthwith send one duplicate original and twenty-five copies to the other secretary.
( b ) Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, two copies of such drawings, profiles, plans or survey, maps and specifications as may be necessary to illustrate clearly the matter of the application shall be delivered to either secretary and he shall send one copy forthwith to the other secretary.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, such additional copies of the documents mentioned therein as may be requested by the Commission shall be provided forthwith.
### §2807. Geoplatform

#### (a) In general

The Committee shall operate an electronic service that provides access to geospatial data and metadata for geospatial data to the general public, to be known as the GeoPlatform.

#### (b) Implementation

#### (1) In general

The GeoPlatform—

(A) shall—

(i) be available through the internet and other communications means;

(ii) be accessible through a common interface;

(iii) include metadata for all geospatial data collected by covered agencies, directly or indirectly;

(iv) include download access to all open geospatial data directly or indirectly collected by covered agencies; and

(v) include a set of programming instructions and standards providing an automated means of accessing available geospatial data, which—

(I) harmonize sources and data standards associated with geospatial data, including metadata; and

(II) to the maximum extent practicable, as determined by the Chairperson of the Committee, shall be made publicly available;

(B) may include geospatial data from a source other than a covered agency, if determined appropriate by the Committee; and

(C) shall not store or serve proprietary information or data acquired under a license by the Federal Government, unless authorized by the data provider.

#### (2) Managing partner

The Chairperson of the Committee shall designate an agency to serve as the managing partner for developing and operating the GeoPlatform, taking direction from the Committee on the scope, functionality, and performance of the GeoPlatform.

#### (c) Clarification

Although the GeoPlatform is intended to include all National Geospatial Data Asset and other Federal datasets, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a covered agency from also presenting, providing, or disseminating data that is—

(1) specific to the functions of the covered agency; or

(2) targeted to information consumers that directly interface with the services, portals, or other mechanisms of the covered agency.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title VII, §758, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3424.)
### §3796aa–4. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–322, title IV, §40156(c)(5), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1924

Section, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §1405, as added Pub. L. 101–647, title II, §241(a)(2), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4811, related to allocation and distribution of funds under formula grants, limitation on use of funds, and waiver of assistance by States.