78118 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Notices 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

New Shipper Review, Preliminary Determination of 

No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 

2017–2018, 85 FR 6911 (February 6, 2020), and 

accompanying preliminary decision memorandum 

(PDM), ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Review: Multilayered 

Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China; 

2017–2018.’’ 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum: Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Review of Multilayered 

Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China; 

2017–2018,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby 

adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). No interested party submitted 

comments regarding the new shipper review; 

therefore, the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

pertains only to the administrative review. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. If the new deadline falls on a weekend or a 

Federal holiday, in accordance with our 

regulations, the deadline will be moved to the next 

business day. As the actual (tolled) deadline was 

Saturday, July 25, 2020, the next business day was 

Monday, July 27, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Review,’’ dated June 5, 2020. As the actual 

(tolled) deadline was Saturday, July 25, 2020, we 

extended the final results deadline 60 days from 

this date. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

6See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended 

Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less 

than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 

FR 76690 (December 8, 2011), as amended in 

Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Antidumping and 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) under item 

numbers: 7304.29.10.10, 7304.29.10.20, 

7304.29.10.30, 7304.29.10.40, 

7304.29.10.50, 7304.29.10.60, 

7304.29.10.80, 7304.29.20.10, 

7304.29.20.20, 7304.29.20.30, 

7304.29.20.40, 7304.29.20.50, 

7304.29.20.60, 7304.29.20.80, 

7304.29.31.10, 7304.29.31.20, 

7304.29.31.30, 7304.29.31.40, 

7304.29.31.50, 7304.29.31.60, 

7304.29.31.80, 7304.29.41.10, 

7304.29.41.20, 7304.29.41.30, 

7304.29.41.40, 7304.29.41.50, 

7304.29.41.60, 7304.29.41.80, 

7304.29.50.15, 7304.29.50.30, 

7304.29.50.45, 7304.29.50.60, 

7304.29.50.75, 7304.29.61.15, 

7304.29.61.30, 7304.29.61.45, 

7304.29.61.60, 7304.29.61.75, 

7305.20.20.00, 7305.20.40.00, 

7305.20.60.00, 7305.20.80.00, 

7306.29.10.30, 7306.29.10.90, 

7306.29.20.00, 7306.29.31.00, 

7306.29.41.00, 7306.29.60.10, 

7306.29.60.50, 7306.29.81.10, and 

7306.29.81.50. 

The OCTG coupling stock covered by 

these orders may also enter under the 

following HTSUS item numbers: 

7304.39.00.24, 7304.39.00.28, 

7304.39.00.32, 7304.39.00.36, 

7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 

7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 

7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 

7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 

7304.39.00.76, 7304.39.00.80, 

7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.15, 

7304.59.80.20, 7304. 9.80.25, 

7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 

7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 

7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 

7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, 

7304.59.80.70, and 7304.59.80.80. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope of these orders is dispositive. 

Continuation of the Orders 

As a result of the determinations by 

Commerce and the ITC that revocation 

of the Orders would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and countervailable subsidies, as well as 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States, pursuant to section 

75l(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the 

continuation of the Orders. U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection will 

continue to collect AD and CVD cash 

deposits at the rates in effect at the time 

of entry for all imports of subject 

merchandise. 

The effective date of the continuation 

of the Orders will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of continuation. Pursuant to 

section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends to 

initiate the next five-year reviews of 

these orders not later than 30 days prior 

to the fifth anniversary of the effective 

date of this continuation notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These five-year sunset reviews and 

this notice are in accordance with 

section 751(c) of the Act and published 

pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). 

Dated: November 27, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26621 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2017– 

2018 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Dalian 

Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., 

Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd., 

Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., 

Ltd., and Fusong Qianqiu Wooden 

Products Co., Ltd. (collectively, Jinlong), 

Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., 

Ltd. (Guyu), and Muchsee Wood 

(Chuzhou) Co., Ltd. (Muchsee Wood) 

have not made sales of multilayered 

wood flooring (wood flooring) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) at 

prices below normal value during the 

period of review (POR) December 1, 

2017 through November 30, 2018. In 

addition, Commerce determines that 

certain companies had no shipments 

during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable December 3, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sergio Balbontin or Alexis Cherry, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–6478 

and 202–482–0607, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of the administrative review and 

new shipper review on February 6, 

2020.1 For the events that occurred 

since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce 

conducted these reviews in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Commerce tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by 50 days, 

thereby extending the deadline for these 

final results until July 27, 2020.3 On 

June 5, 2020, we extended the deadline 

for these final results to September 23, 

2020.4 On July 21, 2020, Commerce 

tolled all deadlines in administrative 

reviews by an additional 60 days.5

Accordingly, the revised deadline for 

the final results of these reviews is now 

November 23, 2020. 

Scope of the Order 6

The product covered by the Order is 

wood flooring from China. A full 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Notices 78119 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 5484 (February 

3, 2012) (collectively, Order). See also Multilayered 

Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Clarification of the Scope of the Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 27799 (June 

19, 2017). 

7See Appendix I. 

8See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 11. 

9See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 

76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment 

Notice); see also ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section below. 

10See Preliminary Results, and Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum at the ‘‘Separate Rates’’ 

section; see also Issues and Decision Memorandum 

at Comment 5. 

11See Longkou Haimeng Mach. Co. v. United 

States, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 1357–60 (CIT 2008) 

(affirming Commerce’s determination to assign a 

4.22 percent dumping margin to the separate-rate 

respondents in a segment where the three 

mandatory respondents received dumping margins 

of 4.22 percent, 0.03 percent, and zero percent, 

respectively); see also Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009). 

12See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). 

13See Preliminary Results, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 17. 

14See Appendix III. 

15See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Section IV. Affiliation and Single Entity.’’ 

16See Appendix IV. 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of these issues is 

attached to this notice.7 The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and electronic version of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Changes From the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, Commerce made 

certain revisions to the calculations of 

the rates assigned to Jinlong, Guyu, and 

the non-examined, separate rate 

respondents. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum contains descriptions of 

these revisions. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that certain companies did 

not have shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. As we 

received no information to contradict 

our preliminary determination with 

respect to those companies, we continue 

to find that they made no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR. Based on 

information received since the 

Preliminary Results, we determine that 

one additional company, Guangzhou 

Homebon Timber Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd., also did not have shipments during 

the POR.8 We will issue appropriate 

instructions that are consistent with our 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ clarification for 

all of the companies listed in Appendix 

II.9

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that Jinlong, Guyu, Muchsee 

Wood, and several additional 

companies who were not selected for 

individual review demonstrated their 

eligibility for separate rates, and we 

continue to do so in these final results.10

Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

The statute and our regulations do not 

address the establishment of a rate to be 

assigned to respondents not selected for 

individual examination when we limit 

our examination of companies subject to 

the administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act. 

Generally, we look to section 735(c)(5) 

of the Act, which provides instructions 

for calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for respondents not 

individually examined in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}’’ Accordingly, 

Commerce’s usual practice in 

determining the rate for separate-rate 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination, has been to average the 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the selected companies, excluding rates 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.11 However, 

when the weighted-average dumping 

margins established for all individually 

investigated respondents are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act 

permits Commerce to ‘‘use any 

reasonable method to establish the 

estimated all-others rate for exporters 

and producers not individually 

investigated, including averaging the 

estimated weighted average dumping 

margins determined for the exporters 

and producers individually 

investigated.’’ 12

For the final results of this review, we 

continue to determine the estimated 

dumping margin for each of the 

individually examined respondents to 

be zero. Thus, consistent with the 

Preliminary Results, we assigned to all 

eligible non-selected respondents the 

zero margin assigned to Jinlong and 

Guyu.13

The China-Wide Entity 

Aside from the companies for which 

we made a final no shipment 

determination, Commerce considers all 

other companies for which a review was 

requested and which did not 

demonstrate separate rate eligibility to 

be part of the China-wide entity.14 For 

the final results of this administrative 

review, we consider 17 companies to be 

part of the China-wide entity. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

For the companies subject to this 

administrative review, including the 

companies that established their 

eligibility for a separate rate, Commerce 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period December 1, 2017, through 

November 30, 2018: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Dalian Qianqiu Wooden 

Product Co., Ltd./Fusong 

Jinlong Wooden Group 

Co., Ltd./Fusong Jinqiu 

Wooden Product Co., Ltd./ 

Fusong Qianqiu Wooden 

Products Co., Ltd. 

(Jinlong) 15 ......................... 0.00 

Jiangsu Guyu International 

Trading Co., Ltd ................ 0.00 

Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review Receiving a 

Separate Rate 16 ............... 0.00 

Final Results of New Shipper Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the new shipper 

review covering the period December 1, 

2017 through November 30, 2018: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
78120 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Notices 

17See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017, 

84 FR 38002, 38003 (August 5, 2019). 

18For a full discussion of this practice see 

Assessment Notice. 

19Commerce is only reviewing entries where Fine 

Furniture (Shanghai) Limited and/or Double F 

Limited was the exporter but Fine Furniture 

(Shanghai) Limited was not the producer of subject 

merchandise. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) 

Co., Ltd ............................. 0.00 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

will determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of 

these reviews. We intend to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results. 

For Jinlong, Guyu, and Muchsee 

Wood, each of which have a weightedaverage dumping margin of zero, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. For entries that 

were not reported in the U.S. sales 

databases submitted by the companies 

individually examined during these 

reviews, and for the companies that did 

not qualify for a separate rate in the 

administrative review, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the China-wide rate (i.e., 85.13 

percent).17 For the respondents which 

were not selected for individual 

examination in this administrative 

review and which qualified for a 

separate rate, we will also instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy cases, for the companies 

which Commerce determined had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries made under 

those exporters’ case numbers (i.e., at 

the exporters’ rates) will be liquidated at 

the China-wide rate.18

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of 

administrative and new shipper reviews 

for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from China entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by sections 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

companies which have a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters that 

received a separate rate in a prior 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 20, 2020. 

Joseph A. Laroski Jr., 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Affiliation and Single Entity 

5. Changes from the Preliminary Results 

6. Discussion of the Issues 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Financial Ratios 

Comment 2: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Labor 

Comment 3: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Inland Freight 

Comment 4: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Glue 

Guyu Issues 

Comment 5: Whether to Continue to Assign 

a Separate Rate to Guyu 

Comment 6: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Thinner 

Comment 7: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Aluminum Paste 

Non-Selected Company Issues 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Have Selected Senmao as a Voluntary 

Respondent 

Comment 9: Whether to Rescind the 

Administrative Review as to Baroque 

Comment 10: Whether Certain Companies 

Filed Proper No Shipment Certifications 

Comment 11: Whether Homebon Had 

Shipments 

Comment 12: Whether to Continue to 

Apply a Zero Dumping Margin to the 

Separate Rate Companies 

7. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

No Shipments 

Anhui Yaolong Bamboo & Wood Products 

Co. Ltd. 

Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., 

Ltd. 

Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., 

Ltd. 

Benxi Flooring Factory (General Partnership) 

Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Fine Furniture (Fine Furniture (Shanghai) 

Limited and Double F Limited) 19

Guangzhou Homebon Timber Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd. 

Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., Ltd. 

Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd. 

Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd. 

Innomaster Home (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd. 

Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd. 

Kingman Floors Co., Ltd. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Notices 78121 

20 In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

inadvertently identified this company as ‘‘Omni 

Arbor Solutions Co., Ltd.’’ See Letters from Omni 

Arbor Solution Co., Ltd., ‘‘Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China 

Request for Review,’’ dated December 31, 2018, and 

‘‘Multilayered Wood Flooring from China: Case 

Brief—Omni Arbor Solution Co., Ltd.,’’ dated 

March 10, 2020. 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate 

of Oman and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty Investigations, 85 FR 68287 

(October 28, 2020). 

2See 19 CFR 351.205(e). 

3The petitioners consist of the Aluminum 

Association Trade Enforcement Working Group and 

its individual members: Gra ̈nges Americas Inc., JW 

Aluminum Company, and Novelis Corporation. 

4See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Investigations Concerning Certain Aluminum Foil 

from the Sultanate of Oman and the Republic of 

Turkey—Petitioners’ Request to Postpone 

Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated November 23, 

2020. 

5 Id. at 2. 

Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Longteng Wood Co., Ltd. 

Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

Xuzhou Antop International Trade Co., Ltd. 

Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III 

China-Wide Entity 

Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products Co., 

Ltd. 

Chinafloors Timber (China) Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Huade Wood Product Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Houzhou Chenchang Wood Co., Ltd. 

Jiafeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Power Dekor North America Inc. 

Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd. 

Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd. 

Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., Ltd 

≤Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Appendix IV 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

Receiving a Separate Rate 

A&W (Shanghai) Woods Co., Ltd. 

Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd. 

Benxi Wood Company 

Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Shengyu Science And Technology 

Development Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. 

Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd. 

Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC 

Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Dunhua City Wanrong Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., Ltd. 

HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products, Ltd. 

Hangzhou Hanje Tec Company Limited 

Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc. 

Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd 

Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd 

Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd. 

Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., 

Ltd. 

Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd. 

Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. 

Karly Wood Product Limited 

Kember Flooring, Inc. 

Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. 

Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring, Inc. 

Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. 

Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. 

Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., 

Ltd. 

Omni Arbor Solution Co., Ltd.20

Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., 

Ltd. 

Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd. 

Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material Co., 

Ltd. 

Shenyang Haobainian Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. 

Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd. 

Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd. 

Yekalon Industry Inc. 

Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. 

(successor-in-interest to Guangdong 

Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd.) 

Zhejiang Dadongwu Green Home Wood Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26330 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–523–816, C–489–845] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From the 

Sultanate of Oman and the Republic of 

Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary 

Determinations in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigations 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable December 3, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office III 

(Sultanate of Oman); and Eliza Siordia, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office V (Republic 

of Turkey); Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1009 and (202) 482–3878, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 19, 2020, the Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) initiated the 

countervailing duty (CVD) 

investigations of certain aluminum foil 

from the Sultanate of Oman and the 

Republic of Turkey.1 Currently, the 

preliminary determinations are due no 

later than December 23, 2020. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determinations 

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

Commerce to issue the preliminary 

determination in a CVD investigation 

within 65 days after the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation. 

However, section 703(c)(1) of the Act 

permits Commerce to postpone the 

preliminary determination until no later 

than 130 days after the date on which 

Commerce initiated the investigation if: 

(A) The petitioner makes a timely 

request for a postponement; or (B) 

Commerce concludes that the parties 

concerned are cooperating, that the 

investigation is extraordinarily 

complicated, and that additional time is 

necessary to make a preliminary 

determination. Under 19 CFR 

351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a 

request for postponement 25 days or 

more before the scheduled date of the 

preliminary determination and must 

state the reason for the request. 

Commerce will grant the request unless 

it finds compelling reasons to deny the 

request.2

On November 23, 2020, the 

petitioners 3 in these investigations 

submitted a timely request that 

Commerce postpone the preliminary 

CVD determinations.4 According to the 

petitioners, additional time is necessary 

to allow Commerce to ‘‘analyze fully the 

questionnaire responses, request any 

necessary clarifications and determine 

the extent to which countervailable 

subsidies have benefited the 

respondents in the preliminary phase of 

these proceedings.’’ 5 Consistent with 19 

CFR 351.205(e), the petitioners stated 

the reasons for requesting a 

postponement of the preliminary 

determinations, and Commerce finds no 

compelling reason to deny the request. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, Commerce is 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES