alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          59,961
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  515,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,038
<INVENTORY>                                    614,402
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,198,356
<PP&E>                                       1,289,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                 292,067
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,737,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,282,221
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,625,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,800
<OTHER-SE>                                    (753,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,737,416
<SALES>                                      1,236,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,193,770
<CGS>                                          804,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  804,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,269,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 69,338
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,338
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,338
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
FAA UAS Civil COA Request 

Any information that is provided Is bound by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be releasable. This 

requires compliance to FOIA and consent to the release of your information. If you do not consent to the release of 

your Information, you must contact us for further guidance. For more information, please visit http://www.foia.gov/. 

Date KJ6!18/2015 

333 Exemption # or 

Federal Register Docket # 

Proponent Information 

Contact Name lAIIen VanNoppen 

Company Name 

Street Address 1 1108 Valdese Ave 

Street Address 2 

City !Morganton 

State INc C:l Zip Code 

Phone Number ~28-413 7 466 

E-mail Address ~llen@vannop~en.co 

Aircraft System 

Aircraft Type 

Aircraft Registration 

IDJI - Phantom 3 drone 

In one 

Perfonnance Characteristics 

Climb Rate 

(Feet/Minute) 

Tum Rate 

(Degrees/Second) 

Cruise Max 

Speed 

Gross Takeoff Weight 

!7oo 

~5 

pomph 

11 200 g 

Operational Information 

Location 

@8655 

Descent Rate 

(Feet/Minute) 

Approach Speed 

Min 

Launch/Recovery 

poo 

kmph 

11 mph 

11200 g 

Altitude 

"' 

11 220-1620 Distance from !1 mile 

nearest Town/City c:....;.;.;.;.;.:.. _____ _, 

Description of 

Operation 

Video and still photography of nature scenes 

Operation Area in vicinity of 35.748326, -81.700196 

Operations Area (Attach VFR Chart with Coordinates) 

Class of Airspace 

O A 

0 Under Mode C Veil 

O D 

G 

Flight Conditions 

VFR 0 IFR 

Air Traffic Communication 

0 VHF 

0 UHF 

Procedures 

Transmitter 

OYes 

®No 

Transmitter 

OYes 

®No 

Lost Link Procedures 

1. How long to activate LL procedure 

3. Lost Link Route 

t'rect launch point 

5. Flight Termination Point 

!launch point 

Lost Communication Procedures 

0 B (Requires FAA HQ approval) 

oc 

~E 

0 G (With an operational ATC Tower) 

Receiver 

OYes 

®No 

Receiver 

OYes 

®No 

Guard (Emergency Frequency) 

OYes 

®No 

Guard (Emergency Frequency) 

OYes 

®No 

2. LLAititude 

lless than 400 ' AGL 

4. Lost Link Point 

rrect launch point 

1. Between Pilot and Air Traffic Control 

NA 

2. Between Pilot and Observer 'CI 

verbal 

Observer 

Line of Sight of Observer 

Yes 

0 Other 

lline of sight if operator 

Time of Day 

Transponder 

®Day 

OYes 

0No 

® N/A 

0 Night 0 Both 

ModeC 0 

Please return completed fonn to 9·AJV·115·UASOrganization@faa.gov.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 06-0341 

Standard Review Draft 6/6/2006 

ENGINEER: Macek \ AMO 

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview: P-06-0341 was 

placed into limited standard review for human health to 

determine whether this case qualifies as a . 

This report is an update to the FOCUS ready draft of 

4/6/06. The assessment of potential inhalation exposure 

during use has been revised based on additional details 

on the facility design and work practices. 

SUBMITTER: 3M Company 

USE:

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Yes Label: No 

Gen Eqpt: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL: 

CRSS (04/03/2006): 

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 

VP: 

MW: 

Consumer Use: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6




CALL BY: Greg Macek 

Organization: USEPA/OPPT/EETD/CEB 

CALL TO: 

Organization: 3M Company 

Date: 06/06/2006 

Time: 

Phone: 

Concerning what TSCA ? 

PMN: 06-0341 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
§ 241.1085 Title evidence. ( a ) Upon insurance of the loan, the lender shall furnish to the Commissioner a policy of title insurance as provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. If the lender is unable to furnish such policy for reasons satisfactory to the Commissioner, the lender shall furnish such evidence of title as provided in paragraphs (a)(2), (3) or (4) of this section as the Commissioner may require. Any policy of title insurance, or evidence of title required under this section shall be furnished without expense to the Commissioner. The acceptable types of title evidence are: ( 1 ) A policy of title insurance issued by a company and in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner. The policy shall name the lender and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, as their respective interests may appear, as the insured. The policy shall provide that upon acquisition of title by the lender or the Secretary, it will continue to provide the same coverage as the original policy, and will run to the lender upon its acquisition of the property in extinguishment of the debt, and to the Secretary upon acquisition of the property pursuant to the loan insurance contract.
( 2 ) An abstract of title satisfactory to the Commissioner, prepared by an abstract company or individual engaged in the business of preparing abstracts of title, accompanied by a legal opinion satisfactory to the Commissioner, as to the quality of such title, signed by an attorney at law experienced in the examination of titles;
( 3 ) A Torrens or similar title certification; or
( 4 ) Evidence of title conforming to the standards of a supervising branch of the Government of the United States of America, or of any State or territory thereof.
[57 FR 12037, Apr. 8, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 34217, June 24, 1993]
### §8522. Out-of-State vehicles to be exempted from odd-even motor fuel purchase restrictions

#### (a) General rule

Notwithstanding any provision of any Federal, State, or local law, any odd-even fuel purchase plan in effect in any State may not prohibit the sale of motor fuel to any person for use in a vehicle bearing a license plate issued by any authority other than that State or a State contiguous to that State.

#### (b) "Odd-even fuel purchase plan" defined

For purposes of this section the term "odd-even fuel purchase plan" means any motor fuel sales restriction under which a person may purchase motor fuel for use in any vehicle only on days (or other periods of time) determined on the basis of a number or letter appearing on the license plate of that vehicle (or on any similar basis).

(Pub. L. 96–102, title II, §222, Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 767.)
### §390h–12g. Albuquerque Metropolitan Area Water Reclamation and Reuse Project

#### (a) Authorization

The Secretary, in cooperation with the city of Albuquerque, New Mexico, is authorized to participate in the planning, design, and construction of the Albuquerque Metropolitan Area Water Reclamation and Reuse Project to reclaim and reuse industrial and municipal wastewater and reclaim and use naturally impaired ground water and nonpotable surface water in the Albuquerque metropolitan area.

#### (b) Cost share

The Federal share of the cost of a project described in subsection (a) shall not exceed 25 percent of the total cost.

#### (c) Limitation

The Secretary shall not provide funds for the operation or maintenance of a project described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–575, title XVI, §1621, as added Pub. L. 104–266, §2(a)(2), Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3292; amended Pub. L. 105–62, title V, §506, Oct. 13, 1997, 111 Stat. 1339.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 506 of Pub. L. 105–62, which directed the amendment of "section 1621 of title XVI of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Act, Public Law 104–266", was executed by making the amendment to this section, which is section 1621 of title XVI of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act, Pub. L. 102–575, as added by Pub. L. 104–266, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Amendments

1997—Pub. L. 105–62, §506(1), which directed the substitution of "project" for "study" in section catchline, was executed by substituting "Project" for "Study" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–62, §506(2), (3), inserted "planning, design, and construction of the" after "to participate in the" and "and nonpotable surface water" after "impaired ground water".

Pub. L. 105–62, §506(1), which directed the substitution of "project" for "study", was executed by substituting "Project" for "Study" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
[4910-I3-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

fOocket No. FAA-2009-0914; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-122-AD; Amendme

\fu,2>OL\ -') 0\0-ID-')5

39-""'****; AD **'A_**_**]

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 an -300 Series Airplanes, and

::qe/lcJ

~OlmN(1snlBOL

~AE6-

Model A340-300 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Trans ponation

(DOT).

""~"MOOL

In the door 2 area, the hat-racks are supplied wit a basic wire harness

which includes "Oxygen Masks" activation.

In case ofa monument installation, the respective non-used hat-rack

connections between monument and outer skin ire put on stow. It was

noticed in production, that the distance between the stowed wire harness

and the monument could be too small. This condition, ifnot corrected,

could lead to the short circuit of wires dedicatedfo oxygen, which, in case

of emergency, could result in a large number of ~assenger oxygen masks

not being supplied with oxygen, possibly causing personal injuries.

ACTION: Final rule. L-'~

'U

'f/o

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness dir1ctive (AD) for the products lis '1?II

>lG $YMOOL

,VI" - IIe.-{

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwrrthillcss infomlation (MeAn "'In IS

onginated by an aVIatIOnauthority of another countr~ t1 identIfy and correct an unsafe "'5 Lf Ito

condlllOn on an avIation product. Thc MeAl descnbJs the unsafe condition as. ·"'IINGS\'M[<QI. (

I "L ,",,'fA - 10

"n~,(~

* * * * * * *

""
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41124

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANGEL DE JESUS SARABIA-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CR-374-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel De Jesus 

Sarabia-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sarabia-Sanchez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41124 Document: 00513158254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-41124

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-41124 Document: 00513158254 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
### §2407. Reports

Beginning in fiscal year 2007, and each fiscal year thereafter through fiscal year 2012, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives an annual report that describes the number and type of full-time equivalent positions in the Department of the Interior and the amount of overhead costs of the Department of the Interior that are allocated to carrying out this subchapter for the applicable fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 109–451, title I, §108, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3356.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2901 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2901

To provide for the transmission to congressional committees of certain 
reports pertaining to international human rights law or related laws in 
                  connection with military detainees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

Mrs. Tauscher (for herself, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Israel, Mr. 
Andrews, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Reyes, Ms. McCollum of 
 Minnesota, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Crowley, Ms. 
  Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Spratt, Mr. Snyder, Ms. Lee, Mr. 
  George Miller of California, Mr. Meek of Florida, Ms. McKinney, Ms. 
Bordallo, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, and 
 Mr. Meehan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the transmission to congressional committees of certain 
reports pertaining to international human rights law or related laws in 
                  connection with military detainees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Detainee Treatment Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSMISSION TO CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES OF CERTAIN REPORTS 
              PERTAINING TO INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW OR RELATED 
              LAWS IN CONNECTION WITH MILITARY DETAINEES.

    (a) Requirement.--Within 15 days of receipt of a report described 
in subsection (b), the Secretary of Defense shall transmit a copy of 
the report to each of the congressional committees specified in 
subsection (c). Any such report shall be provided on a confidential 
basis if such confidentiality is required by the entity providing the 
report to the Department of Defense.
    (b) Covered Reports.--A report referred to in subsection (a) is any 
report provided to the Department of Defense on a confidential or 
exclusive basis by an entity outside the United States Government that 
pertains to treatment of detainees in custody of Department of Defense 
personnel held at any location in the world in connection with any 
armed conflict, including the war on terror.
    (c) Specified Committees.--The congressional committees referred to 
in subsection (a) are the following:
            (1) The Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
        Foreign Relations of the Senate.
            (2) The Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on 
        International Relations of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0258n.06

Filed: April 13, 2006 No. 05-1028 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. PAUL MICHAEL SEDORE, Defendant-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: SUHRHEINRICH, ROGERS and COOK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Paul Michael Sedore appeals his sentence for identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7) and defrauding the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286. We vacate the sentence and remand the case for re-sentencing under the now-advisory provisions of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, and the factors identified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in accordance with United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). We also provide guidance regarding the application of certain Guidelines provisions Sedore challenges with this appeal.
First, in determining whether Sedore abused a position of trust under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3, the district court may reevaluate whether Sedore occ upied a position of trust, reassessing who qualifies as a victim within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 cmt n.1—the IRS and/or the individuals whose personal information Sedore used for his scheme. See United States v. Guidry , 199 F.3d 1150, 1160No. 05-1028 United States v. Sedore

- 2 - (10th Cir. 1999) (holding that a “position of trust must be found in relation to the victim of the offense” and concluding that, although the government was the victim of the defendant’s false taxreturn filings, the defendant did not occupy a position of trust with the government).
Second, the district court may reexamine its decision to enhance Sedore’s sentence for obstruction of justice under U. S.S.G. § 3C1.1 by determini ng whether Sedore acted “with knowledge that he . . . [was] the subject of an investigation or with the correct belief that an investigation [of him] [w as] probably underway.” United States v. Brown , 237 F.3d 625, 628 (6th Cir. 2001) (internal quotations omitted); accord United States v. Baggett , 342 F.3d 536, 541 (6th Cir. 2003) (“[A] defendant who engage s in obstructive conduct prior to the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense is not subject to the enhancement.”).
The sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for re-sentencing.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00223-CV

In re Joe Jones

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

On April 11, 2014, relator Joe Jones filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking

relief from the trial court’s oral ruling requiring him to appear for deposition and to produce

documents. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8, 52.10. That same day, we stayed the trial court’s ruling

“including any requirement that Jones appear and provide testimony or produce documents.”

We hereby lift the stay with regard to the trial court’s ruling requiring that Jones

appear for deposition. However, we continue to stay the trial court’s ruling requiring that Jones

produce the requested documents. The parties shall file a joint report sixty days from the date of this

order informing this Court about the status of the discovery dispute. 

It is so ordered July 15, 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field
#### § 241.260 Definitions.

All of the definitions contained in § 241.1 shall apply to this subpart. In addition, the term *contract of insurance,* as used in this subpart, means the agreement evidenced by endorsement of the credit instrument by the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative, and includes the provisions of this subpart and of the National Housing Act.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2008\5345\Order re Dismissal.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE,

Plaintiff,

    v.

CITY OF CONCORD, et al.,Defendant.

                                                                      /

No. C 08-05345 CRB

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

The parties have fully settled this action.  Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2010                                                              CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05345-CRB   Document 21   Filed 06/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T11:23:49-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
§ 234.255 Cross-reference. ( a ) *Provisions.* All of the provisions of §§ 203.251 through 203.436 of this chapter (part 203, subpart B) covering mortgages insured under section 203 of the National Housing Act shall apply to mortgages insured under section 234(c) of the National Housing Act except the following provisions: Sec. 203.258 Substitute mortgagors. 203.259a Scope. 203.280 One-time MIP. 203.281 Calculation of one-time MIP. 203.282 Mortgagee's late charge and interest. 203.283 Refund of one-time MIP. 203.357 Deed in lieu of foreclosure. 203.378 Property condition. 203.379 Adjustment for damage or neglect. 203.380 Certificate of property condition. 203.389 Waived title objections. 203.420 Nature of Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund. 203.421 Allocation of Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund income or loss. 203.422 Right and liability under Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund. 203.423 Distribution of distributive shares. 203.424 Maximum amount of distributive shares. 203.425 Finality of determination. 203.440 *et seq.* Insured home improvement loans.
( b ) *References.* For the purposes of this subpart, all references in §§ 203.251 through 203.436 of this chapter (part 203, subpart B) to section 203 of the Act, one- to four-family, and the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, shall be construed to refer to section 234 of the act, one-family unit, and the General Insurance Fund. The term *property* or *each family dwelling unit* as used in §§ 203.251 through 203.436 of this chapter (part 203, subpart B) shall be construed to include “the one-family unit and the undivided interest in the common areas and facilities as may be designated”.
[36 FR 24628, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 41 FR 42949, Sept. 29, 1976; 42 FR 29305, June 8, 1977; 48 FR 28807, June 23, 1983; 55 FR 34814, Aug. 24, 1990]
#### § 220.806 Pro rata refund of insurance premium.

Upon termination of loan insurance contract by a payment in full or by a voluntary termination, the Commissioner shall refund to the lender for the account of the borrower an amount equal to the pro rata portion of the current annual loan insurance premium theretofore paid which is applicable to the portion of the year subsequent to the date of the prepayment or the effective date of the voluntary termination of the contract of insurance.