alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04575

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04575\04575_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04575\04575_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04575\04575_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04575\04575_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04575\Certification Statement Plant ID 04575.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04575\Supplemental Documents\04575_GV_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04575\Supplemental Documents\04575_GV_A5-3_Water Flow Balance Diagrams.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04575\04575_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04575\04575_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Home Deadliest Most Expensive Blowouts Collapse Sunk Rigs Hurricanes Rig List Guestbo o 

# Sea Quest

1. Sea

2. Sea Qu e Ni

3. Sea Q u

4. Sea Que sc u Rig: Sea Quest Semi-sub Date: 17 January 1980 Location: Warri, Nigeria Operator: Texaco Summary One of the first rigs to work in the UK se ctor, the Sea Quest was built by Belfast-based Harland and Wolff and launched 07 January 1967. Orig inally built as the Sedco 135C, the rig was renamed Sea Quest and worked in the late 1960s for Amoco. It made the first commercial oil find in the North Sea when the Arbroath Field was discovered in 1969 and went on to drill the massive Montrose and Forties Fields. A fter working for a decade in the North Sea, the rig was renamed Sedco 135C in 1977 and towed to the west coast of Africa. For the nex t three years, the rig worked offshore Nigeria until 17 January 1980, when the well blew out wh ile drilling for Texaco in the Warri area. The crew were evacuated, after which the blowout caught fire causing extensive fire damage to the Sea Quest. The decision was made to dispose of the rig and it was towed out to sea then scuttled and sunk in deep water. Sources: Ian Anderson & Dennis O'Mara: BBC's Your Place or Mine Driller's Log Photos 1. Dukes Wood Oil Museum 2-4. Driller's Log

[ Home | Deadliest | Most Expensive | Blowouts | Collapse | Sunk Rigs | Hurricanes | Rig List | Links 

### Pa g e 1 of 1 Sea Quest Blowout - Oil Ri g Disasters - Offshore Drillin g Accidents

11/29/2011 htt p ://home.versatel.nl/the

_ sims/ri g /sea q uest.htm
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7796

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT JAMES MURPHY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-93-68, CA-97-397-2) Submitted: April 15, 1998 Decided: April 19, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Robert James Murphy, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert James Murphy seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Murphy , Nos. CR-93-68; CA-97-397-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 1998; Oct. 19, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 CONTAINED IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          23,817
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,013
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,650
<PP&E>                                          34,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,621
<SALES>                                         76,880
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,880
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                72,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,492)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,704)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,704)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.79)


</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13-0 8-00 425- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

PR EN T IC E W AR E, Ap pe l l an t, v . TH E STAT E OF T EXAS, Appe lle e.

On A pp ea l from th e 36 th D i str i ct C ou rt of S an P at ri ci o C ou nty , T ex as . 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez, Just i ces Ro dr i guez, and B enav i des M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am A p p e ll a n t , P re n t ic e W a re , a t t e m p t s t o a p p e a l h is c o n vic t io n fo r ag gra va t e d ro b b e ry. T h e t ri a l c ourt ha s certif ied th at th is “i s a plea-b argain case, a nd th e de fend anthas NO rig ht of app eal.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2(a)(2).2

On J uly 7, 2008, thi s Cour

t notifie d appel lan t’ s c ounse l of the tr ial co urt’ s c erti ficat ion and ordered c ounse l to: (1 ) re v iew the re cord; ( 2) dete rmi ne w hether appel lan t has a r ig ht to app eal; a nd (3) forw ard to th is Cou rt , by letter , couns el’ s findi ng s a s t o w hether appel lan t has a r ig ht t o appea l, or , al ter nati v ely , adv is e thi s C our t as to the e x is tenc e of any amended c erti ficat ion

. O n S e p t e m b er 25, 2 008 , coun sel f iled a lette r brief w ith this Court. Counsel’s respo nse d oes n ot est ablish th at th e certif ication currently on file w ith this Court is incorrect or thatappel lan t ot her

w is e has a r ig ht t o appea l. The Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Proc edure prov ide that an appeal mustbe d is mis sed if the trial court’s certif ication doe s not sho w thatthe d e f e n dan t has th e rig ht of app eal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25. 2(d); se e T EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .1, 4 4.3 , 44. 4. Acco rdingly , this app eal is DI SM ISSE D. An y

pendi ng moti ons are deni ed as moot. PERC UR IAM Do not p ubl is h. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 .2(b). Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 2 day

of Oct ober , 200 8. nd
Exhibit 21.0

List of Subsidiaries



|                                                    |  |                     |     |   |                                        |  |               | 
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | --- | - | -------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | 
|Subsidiaries                                        |  | PercentageOwnership |     |   | Jurisdiction orState of 
Incorporation | 
|                                                    |  |                    
|Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan                   |  |                     | 100 | % |                                        |  | United States | 
|                                                    |  |                    
|Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing Corporation (1) |  |                     | 100 | % |                                        |  | Connecticut   | 



|(1) | Wholly owned subsidiary of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 99.1


    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

                Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
                ------------------------------------------------

     I, Ronald N. Zebeck, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Metris
Companies Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Metris Companies Inc.


                                       /s/ Ronald N. Zebeck
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Ronald N. Zebeck
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                       Principal Executive Officer
                                       October 22, 2002
§ 242.43 Application of cost savings. At the sole discretion of HUD, any cost savings shall be used to: ( a ) Reduce the principal amount of the mortgage and the mortgagor's cash equity contribution proportionally, unless the mortgagor elects to have a greater portion of the savings used to reduce the mortgage; and/or
( b ) Fund any additional construction or substantial rehabilitation approved by HUD.
### §8242. Federal solar program

The Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the General Services Administration, shall develop and carry out a program to demonstrate the application to buildings of solar heating and solar heating and cooling technology in Federal buildings.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title V, §522, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3276.)
| Subsidiary                                                                                                  |    | Jurisdiction   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|----------------|
| Synutra,      Inc.                                                                                          |    | Illinois       |
| Shengyuan      Nutritional Food Co., Ltd.                                                                   |    | China          |
| Heilongjiang      Mingshan Dairy Co., Ltd., previously known as Luobei Shengyuan Dairy Co.,      Ltd.       |    | China          |
| Zhangjiakou      Shengyuan Dairy Co., Ltd.                                                                  |    | China          |
| Inner      Mongolia Shengyuan Food Co., Ltd.                                                                |    | China          |
| Meitek      Technology (Qingdao) Co., Ltd., previously known as Mei Tai Technology      (Qingdao) Co., Ltd. |    | China          |
| Heilongjiang      Baoquanling Shengyuan Dairy Co., Ltd.                                                     |    | China          |
| Inner      Mongolia Mengyuan Food Co., Ltd.                                                                 |    | China          |
| Heilongjiang      Baoquanling Shengyuan Dairy Cow Breeding Co., Ltd.                                        |    | China          |
| Beijing      Shengyuan Huiliduo Food Technology Co., Ltd.                                                   |         | China          |
| Harbin      Shengyuan Dairy Co., Ltd.                                                                       |         | China          |
| Qing      Dao Shengyuan  nutritional beverage Co., Ltd.                                           |         | China          |
| Unisono      B.V.                                                                                           |         | Netherlands    |
| Synutra      International Company Limited                                                                  |         | BVI            |
| Synutra      International (HK) Company Limited                                                             |         | Hong      Kong |
| Beijing      Shengyuan Meitek Technology Development Co., Ltd.                                              |         | China          |

| VIE/Subsidiary                                                    |    | Jurisdiction |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------|
| Beijing      Shengyuan Huimin Technology Service Co., Ltd.        |    | China        |
| Nanjing      Shengyuan Huiren Clinical Examination Co., Ltd.      |    | China        |
| Taiyuan      Shengyuan Huiren Clinical Examination Co., Ltd.      |         | China        |
| Shijiazhuang      Shengyuan Huiren Clinical Examination Co., Ltd. |    | China        |
| Heilongjiang      Shengyuan Huiren Clinical Examination Co., Ltd. |         | China        |

----
§ 26.16 Motions. ( a ) *Motions.* Requests for rulings or actions to be taken by the hearing officer should be made, wherever appropriate, in the form of a motion. All motions from the commencement of the action until the issuance of a decision shall be addressed to the hearing officer, and shall be served upon all parties to the proceeding.
( b ) *Content.* All written motions shall state the particular order, ruling, or action desired and the grounds for granting the motion. The parties may submit a proposed order with any motion.
( c ) *Responses to motions.* Within 10 days after receipt of any written motion, or within any other period as may be designated by the hearing officer, the opposing party shall respond to the motion and set forth any objections to the motion. Failure to file a timely response to the motion may constitute a party's consent to the granting of the motion. The moving party shall have no right to reply, except as permitted by the hearing officer.
( d ) *Motions for extensions of time.* Either party may file a motion for extension. At the discretion of the hearing officer, a motion for an extension of time may be granted for good cause at any time, notwithstanding an objection or any reply to the motion consistent with the provisions of § 26.2(c)(5) and (7). The hearing officer may waive the requirements of this section as to motions for extensions of time.
( e ) *Oral argument.* The hearing officer may order oral argument on any motion.
( f ) *Motions for summary judgment.* ( 1 ) A party claiming relief or a party against whom relief is sought may timely move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim.
( 2 ) Objections in the consideration of summary judgment motions or answers thereto based upon a failure to strictly comply with the provisions of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may, at the discretion of the hearing officer, be overruled.
( g ) *Motions for dismissal.* When a motion to dismiss the proceeding is granted, the hearing officer shall issue a determination and order in accordance with the provisions of § 26.25.
§ 206.135 Application for insurance benefits and fiscal data. ( a ) On the date the application for assignment is filed, the mortgagee shall submit to the Commissioner: ( 1 ) *Credit and security instrument.* The original credit and security instruments assigned without recourse or warranty, except that no act or omission of the mortgagee shall have impaired the validity and priority of the mortgage.
( 2 ) *Proposed assignment instrument.* A copy of the proposed assignment of mortgage.
( 3 ) *Hazard and flood insurance.* All hazard and flood insurance (if applicable) policies held in connection with the mortgaged property, together with a copy of the mortgagee's notification to the carrier authorizing the amendment of the loss payable clause substituting the Commissioner as the mortgagee.
( 4 ) *Rights and interests.* An assignment of all rights and interests arising under the mortgage, and all claims of the mortgagee against the borrower or others arising out of the mortgage transaction.
( 5 ) *Property.* All property of the borrower held by the mortgagee or to which it is entitled (other than the cash items which are to be retained by the mortgagee).
( 6 ) *Records and accounts.* All records, ledger cards, documents, books, papers and accounts relating to the mortgage transaction.
( 7 ) *Additional information.* Any additional information or data which the Commissioner may require.
( 8 ) *Title evidence.* All title evidence held by the mortgagee. It need not be extended to include the recordation of the assignment. The title insurance policy shall be endorsed from the mortgage insurance company up to the point of assignment. At the point of assignment, the Commissioner shall be named insured under such policy.
( b ) All documents required in paragraph (a) of this section must be submitted and approved before a claim for assignment may be submitted.
( c ) *Recorded assignment instrument.* The original of the recorded assignment of mortgage shall be forwarded to the Commissioner as soon as received by the mortgagee, but in no case shall it be longer than 12 months after recordation. If the original of the assignment is not available, a copy shall be furnished and the original forwarded as soon as possible.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Famous Dave's of America,
Inc. does hereby certify that:

     a.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Dave's of America, Inc.
          for the quarter ended September 28, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934: and

     b.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Famous
          Dave's of America, Inc.


Dated:  November 7, 2003                          /s/ Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 247.5 Inapplicability to substantial rehabilitation or demolition.

This subpart shall not apply in any case in which the landlord terminates the occupancy of a tenant as a direct result of a determination, concurred in by HUD, to substantially rehabilitate or demolish the project or to dispose of the project to a purchaser who purchases for the purpose of substantial rehabilitation or demolition.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

JOHNSON HEALTH TECH CO. LTD., JOHNSON 

HEALTH TECH NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees

______________________ 

2015-2027

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-

00184.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

ROBERT PARRISH FREEMAN, JR., Maschoff Brennan 

Laycock Gilmore Israelsen & Wright PLLC, Salt Lake 

City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by LARRY 

LAYCOCK, MARK W. FORD. 

JOHN C. SCHELLER, Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, 

Madison, WI, argued for appellees. Also represented by 

ANDREW DUFRESNE; KEVIN MORAN, Waukesha, WI. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 5, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MemberWorks Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary A. Johnson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Gary A. Johnson
-------------------
Gary A. Johnson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
MemberWorks Incorporated
November 13, 2003

























A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.