alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 246.1 Scope and effect of regulations. ( a ) The regulation of rents for a project coming within the scope of “Subpart B—Unsubsidized Insured Projects” is preempted under these regulations only when the Department determines that the delay or decision of the local rent control board, or other authority regulating rents pursuant to state or local law (hereinafter referred to as board) jeopardizes the Department's economic interest in a project covered by that subpart. The regulation of rents for projects coming within the scope of “Subpart C—Subsidized Insured Projects” is preempted in its entirety by the promulgation of these regulations. The regulation of rents for projects coming within the scope of “Subpart D—HUD-Owned Projects” rests within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Department.
( b ) Any state or local law, ordinance, or regulation is without force and effect insofar as it purports to regulate rents of: ( 1 ) Projects for which a determination of preemption has been made pursuant to subpart B, or
( 2 ) projects coming within the scope of subpart C or D. Compliance with such law, ordinance, or regulation shall not be required as a condition of, or prerequisite to, the remedy of eviction, and any law, ordinance, or regulation which purports to require such compliance is similarly without force and effect.
( c ) It is the purpose of the Department that these regulations shall bar all actions of a board that would in any way frustrate the purpose or effect of these regulations or that would in any way delay, prevent or interfere with the implementation of any increase in rental charges approved by HUD.
( d ) These regulations may be offered as a defense to a proceeding by whomever initiated, which may be brought or threatened to be brought against any owner, mortgagor or managing agent of a project subject to these regulations who demands, receives or retains, or seeks to demand, receive or retain, rental charges approved by HUD, or as a basis for declaratory, injunctive or other relief against any person or agency, public or private, who attempts to enforce, or threatens to enforce, any state or local law, ordinance, or regulation which is without force and effect by reason of this regulation.
( e ) This part applies to mortgages insured under the National Housing Act. It does not apply to mortgages insured under section 542(c) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 1707).
[40 FR 49318, Oct. 22, 1975. Redesignated at 49 FR 6713, Feb. 23, 1984, and amended at 58 FR 64038, Dec. 3, 1993; 59 FR 62524, Dec. 5, 1994]
§ 203.1 Underwriting procedures. The three underwriting procedures for single family mortgages are: ( a ) *Direct Endorsement.* This procedure, which is described in § 203.5, is available for mortgagees that are eligible under § 203.3.
( b ) *Lender insurance.* This procedure, which is described in § 203.6, is available for mortgagees that are eligible for the Direct Endorsement program under § 203.5, and that are also approved according to § 203.4.
( c ) *Issuing of commitments through HUD offices.* Processing through HUD offices as described in § 203.7, with issuance of commitments, is available only for mortgages that are not eligible for Direct Endorsement processing under § 203.5(b) or to the extent required in § 203.3(b)(4), § 203.3(d)(1), or as determined by the Secretary.
[62 FR 30225, June 2, 1997]
### §2434. Termination of authority

#### (a) In general

Subject to subsection (b), the authority of the Secretary to carry out this subchapter terminates on the date that is 10 years after December 22, 2006.

#### (b) Exception

The termination of authority under subsection (a) shall have no effect on—

(1) any loans guaranteed by the United States under this subchapter; or

(2) the administration of any loan guaranteed under this subchapter before the effective date of the termination of authority.

(Pub. L. 109–451, title II, §215, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3361.)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3009

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enable veterans to transfer from 

a State veterans home in one State to a State veterans home in another 

State, on a space-available basis, without a waiting period with respect 

to establishment of State residency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 21, 2005

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to enable veterans 

to transfer from a State veterans home in one State 

to a State veterans home in another State, on a spaceavailable basis, without a waiting period with respect 

to establishment of State residency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘A Guaranteed Home 

5 for Our Veterans Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 3009 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR VETERANS TO TRANSFER FROM A 

2 STATE VETERANS HOME IN ONE STATE TO A 

3 STATE VETERANS HOME IN ANOTHER STATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 17 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end of sub6 chapter V the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1744. Transfers from State home in one State to 

8 State home in another State 

9 ‘‘No payment or grant may be made under this sub10 chapter to a home in a State that does not allow a veteran 

11 who is a resident of a State home in a different State 

12 to transfer to a State home in that State, on a space13 available basis, without a requirement for a waiting period 

14 with respect to establishment of State residency.’’. 

15 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such 

16 chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating 

17 to section 1743 the following new item:

‘‘1744. Transfers from State home in one State to State home in another 

State.’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1744 of title 38, 

19 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall 

20 apply with respect to payments and grants made by the 

21 Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subchapter V of chap22 ter 17 of title 38, United States Code, after the date of 

23 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Record of Contacts

 FDMS Docket No. FAA-2011-1323

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 7/9/10 ---

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer 7/9/10 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 7/9/10 ---

ATA Craig Fabian 7/9/10 ---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Emergent   Group  Inc.  (the
"registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),
I, Bruce J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


November 13, 2006


/s/ Bruce J. Haber
------------------
Bruce J. Haber
Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00224-CV

Mark McCandless, Joe Petrocelli, and Powell Lane Plaza Partnership, Appellants

v.

Metal Building Components, L.P., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN401001, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have notified us that they have reached a mediated settlement agreement,

one of the terms of which was to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal according

to the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: April 12, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL AND DECLARATION UNDER SEAL, CASE NO. C 09-1484-SI 

SV 346,493,665v1 3-5-10 

WILLIAM J. GOINES (SBN: 061290) 

KAREN ROSENTHAL (SBN: 209419) 

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 

1900 University Avenue, Fifth Floor 

East Palo Alto, California 94303 

Telephone: (650) 328-8500

Facsimile: (650) 328-8508 

goinesw@gtlaw.com

rosenthalk@gtlaw.com

THOMAS D. BROOKS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

SPERLING & SLATER, P.C. 

55 West Monroe, Suite 3200 

Chicago, IL 60603 

Telephone: (312) 641-3200 

Facsimile: (312) 641-6492 

tdbrooks@sperling-law.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs GEM ACQUISITIONCO, LLC and 

GEM REALTY FUND IV, L.P 

KENNETH A. KUWAYTI (SBN 145384) 

kkuwayti@mofo.com 

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 

755 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 

Telephone: (650) 813-5600 

Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 

Attorneys for Defendants SORENSON GROUP HOLDINGS, 

LLC, JAMES L. SORENSON, JOSEPH SORENSON, and

TIMOTHY FENTON 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GEM ACQUISITIONCO, LLC, and GEM 

REALTY FUND IV, L.P., 

 Plaintiffs; 

v.

SORENSON GROUP HOLDINGS, LLC, 

JAMES L. SORENSON, JOSEPH 

SORENSON, TIMOTHY FENTON, and 

DOES 1-25, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 09-1484-SI 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL AND 

SUPPORTING DECLARATION UNDER 

SEAL

Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 70 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL AND DECLARATION UNDER SEAL, CASE NO. C 09-1484-SI 

SV 346,493,665v1 3-5-10 

 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulation for Leave to File Plaintiffs’ 

Motion to Compel and Supporting Declaration Under Seal. Having considered the arguments and 

evidence submitted and for good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT GEM may file its Motion to Compel with redactions in 

the text where referencing materials that were marked as confidential pursuant to the Stipulated 

Protective Order entered in this case, and that the following exhibits to the Declaration of Thomas 

Brooks in Support of the Motion to Compel may be filed under seal pursuant to the Stipulated 

Protective Order: (i) the SGH FNB Ventures, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement dated 

February 17, 2009 and (ii) the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sorenson Group 

Management, LLC dated February 17, 2009. 

Dated: ______________________ ________________________________ 

 SUSAN ILLSTON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 70 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 2
Substitution of Attorney

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

United States of America ) No. CR 09-0148 JSW

 Plaintiff(s) )

 Vs. ) (Proposed) Order granting 

 ) SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY

SOPHIA M ROSES ) For KIMBERLY LUTES-KOTHS

 Defendant(s) )

______________________________)

 The court has received the Defendant’s request through 

Attorney Kimberly Lutes-Koths, to substitute in as Attorney of 

record in place of Attorney Juliana Drous.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Juliana Drous, Esq shall 

be relieved as defense counsel and Kimberly Lutes-Koths, Esq. 

shall be accepted as defense counsel for the above referenced 

matter.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2010 __________________

 JEFFREY S WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 3:09-cr-00148-JSW Document 30 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 1 Case3:09-cr-00148-JSW Document29 Filed02/11/10 Page2 of 2
### §2000ff–9. Medical information that is not genetic information

An employer, employment agency, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee shall not be considered to be in violation of this chapter based on the use, acquisition, or disclosure of medical information that is not genetic information about a manifested disease, disorder, or pathological condition of an employee or member, including a manifested disease, disorder, or pathological condition that has or may have a genetic basis.

(Pub. L. 110–233, title II, §210, May 21, 2008, 122 Stat. 920.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 18 months after May 21, 2008, see section 213 of Pub. L. 110–233, set out as a note under section 2000ff of this title.
§ 1005.104 What lenders are eligible for participation? Eligible lenders are those approved under and meeting the qualifications established in this subpart, except that loans otherwise insured or guaranteed by an agency of the United States, or made by an organization of Indians from amounts borrowed from the United States, shall not be eligible for guarantee under this part. The following lenders are deemed to be eligible under this part: ( a ) Any mortgagee approved by HUD for participation in the single family mortgage insurance program under title II of the National Housing Act;
( b ) Any lender whose housing loans under chapter 37 of title 38, United States Code are automatically guaranteed pursuant to section 1802(d) of such title;
( c ) Any lender approved by the Department of Agriculture to make guaranteed loans for single family housing under the Housing Act of 1949;
( d ) Any other lender that is supervised, approved, regulated, or insured by any other agency of the United States; or
( e ) Any other lender approved by the Secretary under this part.
[63 FR 12372, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 48990, Sept. 11, 1998]
§ 203.382 Cancellation of hazard insurance. The mortgagee shall cancel any hazard insurance policy as of the date of the filing for record of the deed to the Commissioner subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The amount of the return premium due the mortgagee because of such cancellation may be calculated on a “short-rate” basis and reported on fiscal data supporting the application for debentures and the amount shall be deducted from the total amount claimed.
( b ) If the mortgagee's calculation of the return premium is less than the actual return, the amount of the difference between the actual refund and the calculated amount shall be remitted to the Commissioner, accompanied by the carrier's or agent's statement.
( c ) If the mortgagee's calculation of the return premium is more than the actual return, the mortgagee may file with the Commissioner a claim, supported by the carrier's or agent's statement of the amount of the refund, whereupon the Commissioner shall issue a check to the mortgagee in settlement of the claim.
### §2105. Rights of ownership

#### (a) United States title

The United States asserts title to any abandoned shipwreck that is—

(1) embedded in submerged lands of a State;

(2) embedded in coralline formations protected by a State on submerged lands of a State; or

(3) on submerged lands of a State and is included in or determined eligible for inclusion in the National Register.

#### (b) Notice of shipwreck location; eligibility determination for inclusion in National Register of Historic Places

The public shall be given adequate notice of the location of any shipwreck to which title is asserted under this section. The Secretary of the Interior, after consultation with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer, shall make a written determination that an abandoned shipwreck meets the criteria for eligibility for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places under clause (a)(3).

#### (c) Transfer of title to States

The title of the United States to any abandoned shipwreck asserted under subsection (a) of this section is transferred to the State in or on whose submerged lands the shipwreck is located.

#### (d) Exception

Any abandoned shipwreck in or on the public lands of the United States is the property of the United States Government. Any abandoned shipwreck in or on any Indian lands is the property of the Indian tribe owning such lands.

#### (e) Reservation of rights

This section does not affect any right reserved by the United States or by any State (including any right reserved with respect to Indian lands) under—

(1) section 1311, 1313, or 1314 of this title; or

(2) section 414 or 415 of title 33.

(Pub. L. 100–298, §6, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 433.)
1667 K Street NW, Suite 300   |   Washington, DC  20006   |   www.cspa.org   |   p.202‐872‐8110   f.202‐223‐2636

CAPHRA PBPK Modeling Working Group Meeting with EPA 

PBPK Modeling #1 

November 6, 2014, 1:00 PM 

Potomac Yards South - 9100 

Agenda 

1. Introductions 

2. CAPHRA Conceptual Framework – 10 min – T. Osimitz 

3. Use of an in vitro-based model development approach to support risk assessment for 

pyrethroids - Presentation by M. Yoon – 20 min 

4. Use of Model by EPA 

a. Features needed 

b. Parameter inputs 

c. Application to Risk Assessments 

5. Approaches to Read-Across 

6. Timeline for preparation for SAP 

7. Other 

Participants 

Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division

Anna Lowit, Kelly Lowe, Monique Perron, Jaime D’Agostino, and William Irwin 

CAPHRA 

Paul Hinderliter (Syngenta), Miyoung Yeon and Harvey Clewell (The Hamner), Tom Osimitz (Science 

Strategies)
| 1)      | the Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)      | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              | Darwin      Resources, Inc. |                                                |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|              |                        |                                                |   |
| November 14, 2008 | By:                         | /s/      Mark Rentschler                            |   |
|              | Name:        | Mark      Rentschler                                |   |
|              | Title:       | Treasurer,      Principal Financial                 |   |
|              |                        | Officer      and Principal Accounting Officer  |   |
|              |                        |                                                     |   |
#### In the Matter of Peter Pan Playland, Inc., Respondent, against Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, Appellants.

Motion by the Independent Civic Association of Sheepshead Bay, Inc., for permission to file a brief *amicus curice*granted. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 214.201 Termination of HUD-approved status and grant agreements. ( a ) *Cause for termination by HUD.* HUD may terminate an agency's approval; remove an SHFA; remove one or more branches or affiliates from the HUD portion of an intermediary's, MSO's, or SHFA's counseling program; and terminate any grant agreements (if applicable) upon confirmation of any of the following reasons: ( 1 ) Noncompliance with program requirements;
( 2 ) Failure to implement in whole or in part the agency's approved housing counseling work plan or failure to notify HUD of changes in the agency's housing counseling work plan;
( 3 ) Lack of the capacity to deliver the housing counseling activities described in its approved housing counseling work plan;
( 4 ) Failure to achieve outcomes described in the work plan;
( 5 ) Misuse of grant funds; or
( 6 ) HUD determines that there is good cause.
( b ) *Agency withdrawal.* The participating agency may withdraw from the Housing Counseling program at any time.
( c ) *Post-termination, post-withdrawal requirements.* All terminations by HUD, or an agency's withdrawal, must be in writing. When a termination or withdrawal occurs, the agency must return to HUD any unexpired “Certificate of Approval.” A terminated or inactive agency cannot continue to display the certificate. If HUD has determined that an agency will be terminated from participating in the Housing Counseling program, and an agency does not voluntarily withdraw, then HUD may follow the provisions found in 24 CFR part 24.
#### § 94.5 Application.

Any person, institution, or other body may apply to the U.S. Central Authority for assistance in locating a child, securing access to a child, or obtaining the return of a child that has been removed or retained in breach of custody rights. The application shall be made in the form prescribed by the U.S. Central Authority and shall contain such information as the U.S. Central Authority deems necessary for the purposes of locating the child and otherwise implementing the Convention. The application and any accompanying documents should be submitted in duplicate in English or with English translations. If intended for use in a foreign country, two additional copies should be provided in the language of the foreign country.
### §89. Quarantine warehouses; erection

There shall be purchased or erected, under the orders of the President, suitable warehouses, with wharves and inclosures, where merchandise may be unladen and deposited, from any vessel which shall be subject to a quarantine, or other restraint, pursuant to the health laws of any State, at such convenient places therein as the safety of the public revenue and the observance of such health laws may require.

(R.S. §4794.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4794 derived from act Feb. 23, 1799, ch. 12, §3, 1 Stat. 620.
#### § 242.54 Nondiscrimination.

Hospital facilities financed with mortgages insured under this part must be made available without discrimination as to race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. Hospitals must be operated in compliance with all applicable civil rights laws and regulations, including 24 CFR part 200, subpart J (Equal Employment Opportunity), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12101 *et seq.*). Racially restrictive covenants are per se illegal and their use is prohibited. The aforesaid provisions regarding age and sex discrimination do not affect the eligibility of hospitals for women and children.
#### § 241.875 Maximum claim period.

Notice of intention to file claim on a form prescribed by the Commissioner shall be filed within 45 days after the lender becomes eligible for the benefits of the loan insurance, or within such later time as may be agreed upon by the Commissioner in writing.
Case 3:09-cv-01972-BZ Document 50 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:09-cv-01972-BZ Document 50 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:09-cv-01972-BZ Document 50 Filed 03/01/10 Page 3 of 3