alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.949 Building product standards and certification program for exterior insulated steel door systems. ( a ) *Applicable standards.* ( 1 ) All Exterior Insulated Steel Door Systems shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with the following standards from the American Society for Testing and Materials and Insulated Steel Door Systems Institute: ( i ) ASTM A591/A591M-89—Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Electrolytic-Zinc Coated, for Light Coating Mass Applications;
( ii ) ISDSI-100-90—Door Size Dimensional Standard and Assembly Tolerances for Insulated Steel Door Systems;
( iii ) ISDSI-101-83—(Reapproved 1989) Air Infiltration Performance Standard for Insulated Steel Door Systems;
( iv ) ISDSI-102-84—Installation Standard for Insulated Steel Door Systems;
( v ) ISDSI-104-86—Water Penetration Performance Standard for Insulated Steel Door Systems;
( vi ) ISDSI-105-80—Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for Physical Endurance for Steel Doors and Hardware Reinforcings;
( vii ) ISDSI-106-80—Test Procedure and Acceptance Criteria for Prime Painted Steel Surfaces for Steel Doors and Frames;
( viii ) ISDSI-107-80—Thermal Performance Standard for Insulated Steel Door Systems;
( ix ) ASTM F476-84—(Reapproved 1991) Standard Test Methods for Security of Swinging Door Assemblies.
( 2 ) These standards have been approved by the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference. These standards are available from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103 or the Insulated Steel Door Institute, 712 Lakewood Center North, 14600 Detroit Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44107. These standards are also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) *Labeling.* Under the procedures set forth in § 200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's certification of compliance with the applicable standards is required to be on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality assurance inspection.* Under the procedure set forth in § 200.935(d)(8), testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) At least every four years, the administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified exterior insulated steel door system for testing by an approved laboratory in accordance with the applicable standard.
( 2 ) The administrator also shall review the quality assurance procedures every year to assure that they are being followed by the manufacturer.
[58 FR 67675, Dec. 22, 1993]
Case 3:09-cv-01973-EDL Document 92 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01973-EDL Document91 Filed08/06/10 Page1 of 2
Case3:09-cv-01973-EDL Document91 Filed08/06/10 Page2 of 2

9

Case 3:09-cv-01973-EDL Document 92 Filed 08/09/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Rochester Atlas Wrecking Company, Inc., Respondent, v E. J. Del Monte Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order imanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order striking its first, second, third and fourth affirmative defenses and dismissing its first and second counterclaims. Plaintiffs action is for a breach of a written contract and lease agreement made with defendant’s predecessor in title under which plaintiff was to conduct a landfill operation on defendant’s property. The first affirmative defense of illegality was properly stricken. Defendant does not contend that the contract was illegal but rather that plaintiff did not obtain proper approval from the county. The contract made it incumbent upon defendant’s predecessor in title to obtain the required approval and it appears conclusively from the record that such approval was obtained. The second affirmative defense alleging that plaintiff conducted filling without a permit on lands adjoining defendant’s property was properly dismissed as legally insufficient and as irrelevant to any issue raised in the complaint. Any further allegations, contained in the second affirmative defense may be proven, if material, under a general denial. The court properly struck the third affirmative defense of the Statute of Frauds inasmuch as plaintiffs action is based on a written agreement. The fourth affirmative defense pleading the Statute of Limitations is without merit. *1176Plaintiffs action for breach of contract was timely commenced (CPLR 213, subd 2). Defendant’s first and second counterclaims, asserted for the first time on December 9, 1975, contain causes of action in trespass and negligence based on occurrences in 1969. The counterclaims were not timely (CPLR 214, subd 4) and were properly dismissed. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court—dismiss defenses and counterclaims.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Denman, JJ.
exv10w11






Exhibit 10.11




Summary of Certain Director Compensation Matters



Effective October 1, 2010, the PostRock Board of Directors approved the compensation of
non-employee directors, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The annual cash
retainer for non-employee directors totals $30,000, with the chairman of the board receiving an
additional $15,000 per year. The chair of the Audit Committee will receive an additional $10,000
per year, the chair of the Compensation Committee will receive an additional $7,500 per year and
the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive an additional $5,000
per year. PostRock pays a fee of $1,500 for each board meeting attended in person and $250 for each
telephonic board meeting attended. In addition, PostRock pays a fee of $1,000 for attendance at
each committee meeting not held in conjunction with an in-person board meeting, whether the
committee meeting is in person or telephonic. Directors who are employees receive no additional
compensation for serving on the board of directors or its committees. PostRock expects to make an
annual equity award under its 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan to its non-employee directors of 20,000
stock options that vest after one year and have a term of five years.
Honorable John Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Arkansas, to whom the parties consented to submit the case in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2139

_____________

Juanita Stocker, on behalf of Brian *

Stocker, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

John J. Callahan, Acting Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Social Security Administration, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

Submitted: December 9, 1997

Filed: December 19, 1997

_____________

Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the judgment of the District Court affirming the decision of the 1

Commissioner denying appellant's claim on behalf of her son (now nearly 21 but a minor

when the claim was filed) for Supplemental Security Income disability benefits. Having

considered appellant's arguments for reversal, we conclude that the
-2-

Administrative Law Judge made no error of law and that the administrative decision
-3-

denying the claim for disability benefits is supported by substantial evidence in the

record as whole. Because the case raises no novel issues and an opinion by this Court

thus would lack precedential value, we forego further discussion.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 266.632 Withdrawal of claim.

In case of a default and subsequent filing of claim, the HFA shall determine the form of workout or modification and will inform HUD of the type of mortgage relief determined to be appropriate. If the default is cured after the claim is made but before the initial claim payment is paid by HUD, the HFA may, in writing, withdraw the claim, and insurance will continue as if the default had not occurred.
### §2003. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) The term "northern tier States" means the States of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio.

(2) The term "inland States" means those States in the United States other than northern tier States and the States of California, Alaska, and Hawaii.

(3) The term "crude oil transportation system" means a crude oil delivery system (including the location of such system) for transporting Alaskan and other crude oil to northern tier States and inland States, but such term does not include the Long Beach-Midland project.

(4) The term "Long Beach-Midland project" means the crude oil delivery system which was the subject of, and is generally described in, the "Final Environmental Impact Statement, Crude Oil Transportation System: Valdez, Alaska, to Midland, Texas (as proposed by Sohio Transportation Company)", the availability of which was announced by the Department of the Interior in the Federal Register on June 1, 1977 (42 Fed. Reg. 28008).

(5) The term "Federal agency" means an Executive agency, as defined in section 105 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title V, §503, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3158.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definition of "State" in section 2602 of Title 16, Conservation, applies to this section.
#### In the Matter of the Board of Education of the Island Trees Union Free School District, Respondent, v Lawrence Butcher, Appellant.*1012

In a proceeding to quash or modify a subpoena duces tecum which was served upon Ernest Valenze in the course of a proceeding pursuant to section 3020-a of the Education Law against Lawrence Butcher, a tenured teacher, the said teacher appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 6, 1977, as granted in part the application to quash the subpoena and denied in part his cross motion to compel compliance with the said subpoena. Order modified, on the law, by (1) adding thereto provisions directing that the petitioner, at the appellant’s expense, reproduce the entire records of the appellant’s students for the hearing panel, after obliterating all identifying data, and that the panel and the parties’ attorneys examine the records and exclude therefrom any irrelevant portions, (2) deleting the fourth decretal paragraph thereof, (3) deleting from the fifth decretal paragraph thereof the words "shall not permit” and substituting therefor the words "shall permit”, and (4) deleting the sixth decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision that the hearing panel shall preserve a copy of the records produced so that they may be made available in the event that judicial review is sought after the conclusion of the disciplinary proceeding against appellant. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The respondent has failed to sustain the burden of establishing that the records sought are immune from disclosure. (See *Koump v*Smith, 25 NY2d 287, 294.) Any degree of confidentiality accorded -to the students’ records must yield to the appellant’s right to prepare his defense to the charges made against his reputation and his competence in his profession. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
#### Peter Malakauskis, for use of Ambrizeyus Vizbaras, individually and as trustee, appellant, v. Pioneer Fire Insurance Company of America, appellee.

Gen. No. 28,075.

Suit on fire insurance policy. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry Olson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

Rehearing denied June 11, 1923.

Oliver M. Olson, for appellant. Thomas W. Reilly, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Lisa Rodriguez v. Universal Surgical Assistants, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00236-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-2580-12

Trial court: 458th District Court of Fort Bend County

On May 7, 2019, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court 

“pending the completion of the procedure under Rule 4.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.2; see also TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a(4), (5). The trial 

court clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record that includes the trial court’s orders 

“Determining Actual Notice of Appealable Order.” Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal 

on the Court’s active docket. 

Appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this Court no later than 20 days from the date 

of this order.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Julie Countiss

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __July 16, 2019___

 

1 The clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on April 10, 2019. On April 9, 2019, the court 

reporter advised the Clerk of this Court that appellant’s counsel had notified her that 

“there [was] no record associated with this appeal.”
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

** **

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, John W.Elias, Chief Executive Officer of Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

(1)                                  theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Date:  | November 12, 2004 |   | /s/ John W. Elias       |
|--------|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |              | Name:  | John W. Elias           |
|   |              |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
### §1746. Correction of conveyance documents

The Secretary may correct patents or documents of conveyance issued pursuant to section 1718 of this title or to other Acts relating to the disposal of public lands where necessary in order to eliminate errors. In addition, the Secretary may make corrections of errors in any documents of conveyance which have heretofore been issued by the Federal Government to dispose of public lands. Any corrections authorized by this section which affect the boundaries of, or jurisdiction over, land administered by another Federal agency shall be made only after consultation with, and the approval of, the head of such other agency.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title III, §316, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2770; Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title IV, §411(e), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2003—Pub. L. 108–7 inserted at end "Any corrections authorized by this section which affect the boundaries of, or jurisdiction over, land administered by another Federal agency shall be made only after consultation with, and the approval of, the head of such other agency."
#### § 248.300 General.

Upon application by a State agency or a local public housing agency, the Commissioner may make available assistance for use in preventing the loss of housing affordable for low and moderate income families that is assisted under a State program under the terms of which the owner may prepay a State assisted or subsidized mortgage on such housing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7390** 

TIMOTHY LEE COLES , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections; A. COTRELL; S. CHAMBERS; D. FORBES , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00192

- REP )

Submitted : March 26, 2012 Decided: April 6, 2012

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Timothy Lee Coles, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Lee Coles appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coles v. Virginia , No. 3:11

- cv - 00192

- REP (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-228-000.
    Applicants: Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Operational Purchase and Sales 
Report.
    Filed Date: 11/19/20.
    Accession Number: 20201119-5013.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-229-000.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing SCRM Filing Nov 2020.
    Filed Date: 11/19/20.
    Accession Number: 20201119-5017.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-230-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Various 
Releases eff 12-1-2020 to be effective 12/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 11/19/20.
    Accession Number: 20201119-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-231-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement 
Update (Pioneer Jan-Mar 2021) to be effective 11/19/2020.
    Filed Date: 11/19/20.
    Accession Number: 20201119-5036.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-232-000.
    Applicants: Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing CCPL Stage 3 Compliance Filing in 
Docket No. CP18-513 to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/19/20.
    Accession Number: 20201119-5044.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-233-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Boston Gas 
Releases eff 12-1-2020 to be effective 12/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 11/19/20.
    Accession Number: 20201119-5053.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/1/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: November 23, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26306 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
§ 206.111 Due date of MIP. ( a ) *Initial MIP.* The mortgagee shall pay the initial MIP to the Commissioner within fifteen days of closing and as a condition to the endorsement of the mortgage for insurance.
( b ) *Monthly MIP.* Each monthly MIP shall be due to the Commissioner on the first business day of each month except the month in which the mortgage is closed.
### §383. Vested rights and State laws unaffected

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder, and the Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws, and nothing herein shall in any way affect any right of any State or of the Federal Government or of any landowner, appropriator, or user of water in, to, or from any interstate stream or the waters thereof.

(June 17, 1902, ch. 1093, §8, 32 Stat. 390.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 17, 1902, popularly known as the Reclamation Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 8 (less proviso) of act June 17, 1902. The remainder of section 8 is classified to section 372 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Section as Unaffected by Submerged Lands Act

Provisions of this section as not amended, modified or repealed by the Submerged Lands Act, see section 1303 of this title.
ALTERNATIVE B - 15,000 SF FOOTPRINT; MAX. HT.

= 40 FEET.

22'-0” Combined Capital Crescent
~——___Traiand Access Lane

i 255'.0"
es =
— — aa
ss — em ie S
Boat Storage ) } A}
o_o, Area aie
a4 = Rowing Tank
3 =
| f[——*— =f i storage
4 ore,
y Ve yey FIRST FLOOR PLAN
! L J

National Park Service

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

LE



ALTERNATIVE C - 18,682 SF FOOTPRINT; MAX. HT. = 36.5 FEET,

__—.22'-0” Combined Capital Crescent
~ Trail and Access Lane

Toe of Embankment

Washington
Canoe Club

NORTH ELEVATION

ae Da ms * :

WEST ELEVATION

a ——A A 5S,

aap

EUAN eget UH

att] |

b | BBat Storage FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Area

National Park Service

1
coma TARTAIT
ry) PON ebb HL
7 moO
HEHE
TTT

“UTE TL



LTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT, REJE D

&

rdbpect Street, NW

Potential Site Plan for a Boathouse at Dempsey’s
‘Source: Frank Morgan, 2005

wl [ee

Potential Site Plan for a Boathouse at the Upstream Site (Tract 102-109) "Potential Site Plan for a Boathouse east of 34th Street, NW
Source: McKissack and McKissack, 1992 Source: Frank Morgan, 2005

National Park Service

stnvice

-