alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.222 Request for reconsideration. ( a ) Where participation in a Triggering Event has been disapproved, otherwise limited or conditioned because of Previous Participation review, the Controlling Participant may request reconsideration of such determination by a review committee or reviewing officer as established by the Commissioner. Reconsideration decisions shall not be rendered by the same individual who rendered the initial review.
( b ) The Controlling Participant shall submit requests for such reconsideration in writing within 30 days of receipt of the Commissioner's notice of the determination under § 200.220.
( c ) The review committee or reviewing officer shall schedule a review of such requests for reconsideration. The Controlling Participant shall be provided written notification of such a review; such notice shall provide at least 7 business days advanced notice of the reconsideration. The Controlling Participant shall be provided the opportunity to submit such supporting materials as the Controlling Participant desires or as the review committee or reviewing officer requests.
( d ) Before making its decision, the review committee or reviewing officer will analyze the reasons for the decision(s) for which reconsideration is being requested, as well as the documents and arguments presented by the Controlling Participant. The review committee or reviewing officer may affirm, modify, or reverse the initial decision. Upon making its decision, the review committee or reviewing officer will provide written notice of its determination to the Controlling Participant setting forth the reasons for the determination(s).
### **CHAPTER 21A—FORFEITURE OF NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD INDEMNITY LAND GRANTS**
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York

corporation, and DOES 1 through 20,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

CHRISTIE’S, INC., a New York

corporation, 

Counterclaimant,

 v.

HALSEY MINOR, an individual, and

ROES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Counterdefendants. /

No. C 08-05445 WHA

 and 

No. C 09-00471 WHA

NOTICE AND ORDER RE PENDING

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

With respect to the pending motion to withdraw as counsel, the Court has noticed that the

motion was not served on plaintiff Halsey Minor. Plaintiff has a right to participate and be heard

on the motion. It is not enough to simply serve the motion on opposing counsel, as indicated in

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 195 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the proof of service. Movant should cure this problem and make sure that plaintiff Halsey Minor

has proper and timely notice before the hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 195 Filed 08/02/10 Page 2 of 2
(October 6, 1960)

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Babin, Valente and McNally, JJ.:

#### The People of the State of New York v. Radislaw Blazic et al.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person and for an assignment of counsel granted to the extent of assigning Irving Mendelson, Esq., of 217 Broadway, New York, New York, and Jacob W. Friedman, Esq., of 170 Broadway, New York, New York, as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal.
DuPont Chambers Works 

Trailer L-1 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

\..01\.. \..UIIUVI IIIUIIIUCI 

360213 

I LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

To: Document Control Office 

Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics 

EPA East, Room 6428 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

From: Thomas P. McGee, 3rd 

Date: May 12, 2014 

Re: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0012 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics 

EPA East, Room 4146 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

1. Second Semester 2013 Semi-Annual NJPDES-DGW Report, 04/2014 

2. PFOA Monitoring Program Groundwater Results, 04/2014 
Apri110, 2014 

Linda Range 

NJ Department of Environmental Protection 

CHMM, Site Manager 

Bureau of Case Management 

401 East State Street 

Mail Code 401-0SF 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0028 

DuPont Corporate Remediation Group 

Chestnut Run Plaza 715-240 

97 4 Centre Road 

P.O. Box 2915 

Wilmington, DE 19805 

DuPont Chambers Works Complex 

NJPDES-DGW Permit No. NJ0083429 

PFOA Monitoring Program Groundwater Results 

Dear Ms. Range: 

As required by the NJPDES-DGW Permit No. NJ0083429, DuPont samples groundwater semiannually from 36 wells across the site for analysis ofPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and other 

perfluorinated compounds. DuPont sampled the wells in January and February 2014 in 

accordance with the sampling and analysis plan (SAP). The well locations are shown with results 

in Figure 1. PFOA was detected at varying concentrations ranging from not detected [ND 

(0.0010)] at well AA25-M01C to 500 j..tg/L at well G09-M01A (see Table 1). The highest 

concentrations are located toward the center of the site where groundwater is contained by the 

Interceptor Well System. Table 2 lists the other perfluorinated compounds. 

PFOA was detected at concentrations ranging from .52 to 15 j..tg/L in the B (shallow) aquifer 

along the western portion of the site where a component of groundwater flow is towards the 

Delaware River (see Figure 1). This occurrence is not expected to adversely affect the river 

based on previous studies of other compounds detected in groundwater in the area. 

Ifyou have any questions, please contact me at 302.999.6197. 

Very truly yours, 

AndrewS. Hartten 

Project Director 

Corporate Remediation - NJ 

cc: Edward Lutz, DuPont (database link) 

Sin-Kie Tjho, EPA Region 2 

File:507141 

E.l. du Pont de Nemours and Company
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Series 25-2004 (B) L.P. (the "Partnership")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones,
Chief Financial Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.
 
 By:
              /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
              Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
              March
      30, 2009
§ 507.4 Grounds on which meetings may be closed. The Board shall open every portion of every meeting of the agency for public observation except where the agency determines that such portion or portions of the meeting or the disclosure of such information is likely to: ( a ) Disclose matters that are: ( 1 ) Specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interests of national defense or foreign policy, and
( 2 ) In fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order;
( b ) Relate solely to the internal personnel rules and practice of the agency;
( c ) Disclose matters specifically exempted from disclosure by statute: Provided, that such statute: ( 1 ) Requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or
( 2 ) Established practical criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld;
( d ) Disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential;
( e ) Involve accusing any person of a crime, or formally censuring any person;
( f ) Disclose information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( g ) Disclose investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes, or information which if written would be contained in such records, but only to the extent that the production of such records or information would: ( 1 ) Interfere with enforcement proceedings,
( 2 ) Deprive a person of a right to a fair trial on an impartial adjudication,
( 3 ) Constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy,
( 4 ) Disclose the identity of a confidential source and, in the case of a record compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, confidential source,
( 5 ) Disclose investigative techniques and procedures, or
( 6 ) Endanger the life or physical safety of law enforcement personnel;
( h ) Disclose information, the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. This shall not apply in any instance where the Board has already disclosed to the public the content or the nature of its proposed action, or where the Board is required by law to make such disclosures on its own initiative prior to taking final Board action on such proposal; or
( i ) Specifically concern the Board's issuance of a subpoena, or the Board's participation in a civil action or proceeding, an action in a foreign court or international tribunal, or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct or disposition by the Board of a particular case of formal agency adjudication, or otherwise involving a determination on the record after opportunity for a hearing.
§ 26.39 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party or *sua sponte*, the ALJ may schedule a prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may consider the following at a prehearing conference: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) Stipulations of fact and of the authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of documents;
( 3 ) Submission of the case on briefs in lieu of an oral hearing;
( 4 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 5 ) The exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 6 ) Discovery;
( 7 ) The time and place for the hearing; and
( 8 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                        MARCH 29, 1997   MARCH 30, 1996
                                         PRIMARY AND      PRIMARY AND
                                        FULLY DILUTED    FULLY DILUTED
                                       ---------------  ---------------
<S>                                    <C>              <C>
INCOME

Net income (loss)                           ($717,503)       ($102,723)

Preferred Dividends                               ---           73,094
                                            ---------        ---------

Net Income available to Common
Stockholders                                ($717,503)       ($175,817)
                                            =========        =========

Primary and Fully Dilutive Earnings
per Share                                      ($0.15)          ($0.06)
                                            =========        =========
 
NUMBER OF SHARES

Primary and Fully Dilutive

     Weighted Average Shares                4,701,666        2,826,666
                                            =========        =========
 
 
</TABLE>
APPENDIX L: DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

Non-Motorized Boating on the Potomac River in Georgetown (2000) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Georgetown University Boathouse 

Environmental Assessment 

April 2006
### §16. Engrossing and recording patents

The engrossing and recording of patents for public lands may be done by means of typewriters or other machines, under regulations to be made by the Secretary of the Interior and approved by the President.

(Mar. 2, 1895, ch. 177, §3, 28 Stat. 807.)
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\2596\Dismissal with Prejudice.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ELAINE-BARBARA NEISWENDER,

Plaintiff,

    v.

WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, et al.,Defendants.

                                                                      /

No. C 09-2596 CRB

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHPREJUDICE

Plaintiff’s case was dismissed on October 20, 2009, and she was given 30 days in

which to file an amended complaint.  The Order further indicated that failure to file such an

amended complaint would result in a dismissal with prejudice.  Plaintiff has failed to file an

amended complaint, and this action is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-02596-CRB   Document 32   Filed 06/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T05:11:34-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (i)
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/ James A. CalderJames A. CalderChief Financial Officer
### Pesticide concentrations in water and in suspended and bottom sediments in the New and Alamo rivers, Salton Sea Watershed, California, April 2003

By: Lawrence A. LeBlancJames L. Orlando**Kathryn  Kuivila**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds104

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2587 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2587

   To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
                        Adjustment Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

Mr. Cunningham introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make amendments to the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
                        Adjustment Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECLAMATION PROJECTS AUTHORIZATION AND ADJUSTMENT ACT 
              AMENDMENTS.

    Section 1631 of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
Adjustment Act of 1992, as amended by Public Law 104-266 (43 U.S.C. 
390h-13), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the period the 
        following: ``, including Phase II of the Olivenhain Water 
        Treatment Plant''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(2), by adding at the end the 
        following: ``Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, 
        the Federal share of the costs of the projects for which funds 
        are made available under this section shall not exceed 
        $35,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Isidro Vargas, Respondent, v Highwall Metal & Spinning & Stamping Co., Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed September 3, 1976, which found that claimant’s accidental injury arose out of and in the course of his employment and awarded him benefits. Claimant, a machine operator, was employed in a building which had two entrances, one leading to the office and the other leading to the factory. These entrances were on the same street and the employer testified that they were approximately 90 feet apart. On December 17, 1973, claimant finished his day’s work and left through the factory door. He walked several feet on the sidewalk in front of the building until he allegedly slipped on the snow-covered sidewalk in front of the office door and injured his left hand. The board found that the employer had a statutory duty to keep the sidewalk free from snow; that the employer was required to provide properly maintained ingress and egress areas for employees; that claimant fell on some ice or snow on the sidewalk directly in front of the employer’s premises; and that the fall occurred within the precincts of his employment constituting an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. On this appeal, appellants contend that the accident did not arise out of or in the course of claimant’s employment. Section 755 (3)-2.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York requires a lessee or occupant of a building abutting upon a street where the sidewalk is paved to remove snow and ice from the sidewalk within four hours after the snow ceases to fall. Claimant’s employer leased and occupied the building in which he worked. Although the lease contained no provision requiring the employer to remove snow and ice from the sidewalk in front of the building, the employer was under a statutory duty to remove the snow and ice. The employer testified that any time there was snow and ice on the sidewalk porters were sent out by the employer to clean the sidewalks. Considering the statutory duty imposed on the employer to remove snow and ice from the sidewalk in front of the building, the customary practice of the employer of removing the snow and ice, and the fact that the claimant’s fall occurred in front of the office door of the building in which he worked, this court is of the opinion that the board could properly find that claimant’s accident did arise out of and in the course of *his employment*(see *Matter of Husted v Seneca Steel Serv.,*41 NY2d 140; *Matter of Starace v International Term. Operating Co.,*39 AD2d 613). We find without merit appellants’ argument that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that there was snow or ice on the sidewalk when claimant was injured. The decision, therefore, must be *1103affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Sweeney, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### § 266.507 Maintenance requirements.

The mortgagor must maintain the project in accordance with the physical condition standards in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G (Physical Condition Standards and Inspection Requirements).

[85 FR 83444, Dec. 22, 2020]
#### § 242.38 Late charge.

The mortgage may provide for the collection by the mortgagee of a late charge in accordance with terms, conditions, and standards of HUD for each dollar of each payment to interest or principal more than 15 days in arrears, to cover the expense involved in handling delinquent payments. Late charges shall be separately charged to and collected from the mortgagor and shall not be deducted from any aggregate monthly payment.
§ 241.565 Maximum loan amount. The principal amount of the loan shall in no event exceed the cost of the energy conserving improvements including the purchase thereof, cost of installation, architect's fees, interest during construction and such other miscellaneous fees and charges incident to construction as determined by the Commissioner. Nor shall the principal amount of the loan exceed the lesser of the following: ( a ) An amount which can be supported by residual income, which is the amount of net income remaining after payment of all existing debt service requirements and deduction of proprietary earnings, as determined by the Commissioner. The computation of net income shall take into account the amount which will be saved in operating costs over the period of repayment of the loan as a result of the installation of the energy conserving improvements.
( b ) An amount which, when added to the existing outstanding indebtedness, does not exceed the Commissioner's estimate of the value of the project after the energy conserving improvements are installed.
#### § 3280.201 Scope.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth requirements that will assure reasonable fire safety to the occupants by reducing fire hazards and by providing measures for early detection.
#### § 320.29 Guaranty.

With respect to bond-type securities, the Association will guarantee the timely payment of principal of and interest on such securities, subject to the terms and conditions of the securities. The Association's guaranty is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of SouFun Holdings Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Jiangong Dai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 26, 2012



/s/ Richard Jiangong DaiName:

Richard Jiangong DaiTitle:

Chief Executive Officer