alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.12


EXECUTION VERSION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO IVECO TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AGREEMENT
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO IVECO TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June 17, 2022, by the undersigned, pursuant to that certain Nikola Technology License Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2020 (the “Agreement”), by and between Nikola Iveco Europe GmbH (former Nikola Iveco Europe B.V.) (“JVC”), and Iveco S.p.A., a Società per Azioni organized and existing under the laws of Italy (“Iveco”) and Nikola Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Nikola”) (solely with respect to Sections 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6).
WHEREAS, Nikola, JVC and Iveco entered into that certain Iveco Technology License Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2020 (the “Agreement”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.7 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended upon the written agreement of JVC, Iveco and Nikola; and
WHEREAS, JVC, Nikola and Iveco desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned hereby agree as follows:
1.Annex A – Key Technology. Annex A to the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the Annex A – Key Technology attached hereto. 
2.Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of England and Wales.
3.Effectiveness.  This Amendment shall become effective as of the date first set forth above.  
4.Effect of this Amendment.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the Agreement and this Amendment, this Amendment shall prevail and control.  Except as specifically amended as set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
5.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
[Remainder of page intentionally blank]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth in the first paragraph hereof.




						
	NIKOLA IVECO EUROPE GMBH

		
	By:
	/s/ Diego Borghese

	Name:
	David Borghese
	Title:
	CEO, Nikola Iveco Europe Gmbh

		
	By:
	/s/ Ryan Murry

	Name:
	Ryan Murry

	Title:
	CFO, Nikola Iveco Europe GmbH





						
	IVECO S.p.A.

		
	By:
	/s/ Luca Sra

	Name:
	Luca Sra

	Title:
	CEO







						
	NIKOLA CORPORATION

		
	By:
	/s/ Michael Lohscheller

	Name:
	Michael Lohscheller

	Title:
	President, Nikola Motor






SIGNATURE PAGE
FIRST AMENDMENT TO IVECO TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AGREEMENT






Annex A
First Amendment to Iveco Technology License Agreement
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of XP Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”),
I, Guilherme Dias Fernandes Benchimol, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2020



|/s/ Guilherme Dias Fernandes Benchimol | 
|-------------------------------------- | 
|Guilherme Dias Fernandes Benchimol     | 
|Chief Executive Officer                |
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 3 3 3 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. M O S E S V A L D E Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 0

- C R

- 5 8

- 3

B e f o r e J O L L Y , O W E N , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M o s e s V a l d e z h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. V a l d e z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f

a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n
. W e c o n c u r w i t h

c o u n s e l ’s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e

r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 19 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10333 Document: 00511450307 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/19/2011N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 3 3 3

c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-10333 Document: 00511450307 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2011
### §387. Removal of sand, gravel, etc.; leases, easements, etc.

The Secretary, in his discretion, may (a) permit the removal, from lands or interests in lands withdrawn or acquired and being administered under the Federal reclamation laws in connection with the construction or operation and maintenance of any project, of sand, gravel, and other minerals and building materials with or without competitive bidding: Provided, That removals may be permitted without charge if for use by a public agency in the construction of public roads or streets within any project or in its immediate vicinity; and (b) grant leases and licenses for periods not to exceed fifty years, and easements or rights-of-way with or without limitation as to period of time affecting lands or interest in lands withdrawn or acquired and being administered under the Federal reclamation laws in connection with the construction or operation and maintenance of any project: Provided, That, if a water users' organization is under contract obligation for repayment on account of the project or division involved, easements or rights-of-way for periods in excess of twenty-five years shall be granted only upon prior written approval of the governing board of such organization. Such permits or grants shall be made only when, in the judgment of the Secretary, their exercise will not be incompatible with the purposes for which the lands or interests in lands are being administered, and shall be on such terms and conditions as in his judgment will adequately protect the interests of the United States and the project for which said lands or interests in lands are being administered.

(Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 418, §10, 53 Stat. 1196; Aug. 18, 1950, ch. 752, 64 Stat. 463.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 485a of this title.

#### Amendments

1950—Act Aug. 18, 1950, permitted Secretary to grant permanent easements or rights-of-way provided that no easement or right-of-way in excess of 25 years be granted unless there has been prior written approval by the governing board of that water users' organization as may be under contract obligation for repayment on account of the project involved.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 485a of this title apply to this section.
### §641d. Effective date of quitclaim; administration of lands relinquished by States

The quitclaim or relinquishment of all right, title, and interest by the State to any lands under sections 641a to 641d of this title shall not be effective until the Secretary has transferred the lands applied for under section 641a of this title. The Secretary shall provide for the administration and disposition under the public-land laws of the lands quitclaimed or relinquished by the States pursuant to sections 641a to 641d of this title.

(Aug. 13, 1954, ch. 727, §4, 68 Stat. 703.)
**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  Matthew A. Jones                                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Matthew                  A. Jones                                        |
| Title: | Chief                  Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | June                  1, 2007                                            |
#### Theodore Weiss, appellee, v. Lillian Pringle and Agnes Pringle, appellants.

Gen. No. 27,796.

Action of forcible detainer to recover possession of apartment. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Bernard P. Bar asa, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Nichols & Nelson, for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS89312 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.201 Scope and purpose. ( a ) This subpart sets out requirements which must be met by manufacturers of manufactured homes for sale to purchasers in the United States with respect to certification of manufactured home designs, inspection of designs, quality assurance programs, and manufactured home production, and certification of manufactured homes. Other than references and a general description of responsibilities, this subpart does not set out requirements with respect to remedial actions or reports which must be taken or filed under the Act and these regulations.
( b ) The purpose of this subpart is to require manufacturers to participate in a system of design approvals and inspections which serve to assist them in assuring that manufactured homes which they manufacture will conform to Federal standards. Such approvals and inspections provide significant protection to the public by decreasing the number of manufactured homes with possible defects in them, and provide protection to manufacturers by reducing the number of instances in which costly remedial actions must be undertaken after manufactured homes are sold.
### Database for the geologic map of the Chelan 30-minute by 60-minute quadrangle, Washington (I-1661)

By: R. W. TaborV. A. Frizzell Jr.J. T. WhettenR. B. WaittD. A. SwansonG. R. ByerlyD. B. BoothM. J. HetheringtonR. E. Zartman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ds184

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Database:  **Database**                            (904000)                        
- Metadata:                               - **Metadata**                            (pdf)
  - **Metadata**                            (txt) 
- Read Me:  **Read Me**                            (pdf)
- Version History:  **Version History**                            (txt)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area
### §9660a. Grant program

#### (1) Grant purposes

Grants for the training and education of workers who are or may be engaged in activities related to hazardous waste removal or containment or emergency response may be made under this section.

#### (2) Administration

Grants under this section shall be administered by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

#### (3) Grant recipients

Grants shall be awarded to nonprofit organizations which demonstrate experience in implementing and operating worker health and safety training and education programs and demonstrate the ability to reach and involve in training programs target populations of workers who are or will be engaged in hazardous waste removal or containment or emergency response operations.

(Pub. L. 99–499, title I, §126(g), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, and not as part of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
#### Arceo B. M. Laano et al., Respondents, v 54 Main Street Management Corp. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract, the appeal is from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1977, which, *inter alia,*provided that appellant Walter W. Pegalis be disqualified from acting as an attorney in this action. Order modified, on the law, by adding to the seventh decretal paragraph thereof the following: "except that Walter W. Pegalis may act as his own attorney”. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Despite the clear impropriety in appellant Walter W. Pegalis continuing to serve as the attorney of record for the other appellants, he may not be disqualified from representing himself in the case at bar (NYS Bar Assn., Committee on Professional Ethics, Formal Opns 1974, Opn No. 353). We have considered the remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSatellite servicing price estimation instruction bookletThe results of a brief study to develop a possible methodology for estimating the price to non-U.S. Government users for satellite servicing are documented.Document ID19870009150Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171967NASA-CR-171967SAIC-1-120-778-C15SAIC-87/1515Accession Number87N18583Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17207Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009150.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 232.11 Establishment and maintenance of long-term debt service reserve account. ( a ) To be eligible for insurance under this part, and except with respect to Supplemental Loans to Finance Purchase and Installation of Fire Safety Equipment (subpart C of this part), if HUD determines the mortgage presents an atypical long-term risk, HUD may require that the borrower establish, at final closing and maintain throughout the term of the mortgage, a long-term debt service reserve account.
( b ) The long-term debt service reserve account, if required, may be financed as part of the initial mortgage amount, provided that the maximum mortgage amount as otherwise calculated is not thereby exceeded.
( c ) The amount required to be initially placed in the long-term debt service reserve account and the minimum long-term balance to be maintained in that account will be determined during underwriting and separately identified in the firm commitment. Although HUD may, when appropriate to avert a mortgage insurance claim, permit the balance to fall below the required minimum long-term balance, the borrower may not take any distribution of mortgaged property except when both the long-term debt service reserve account is funded at the minimal long-term level and such distribution is otherwise permissible.
[77 FR 55136, Sept. 7, 2012]
(January 9, 1961)

#### (A) Austein G. Bergvall, Appellant, v. Reichert Towing Line, Inc., Respondent. (B) Mary F. Kettreles, Respondent, v. James Kettreles, Appellant.

[In each action] Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §1457b. Use of cooperative agreements

For fiscal year 2010, and each fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior may enter into cooperative agreements with a State or political subdivision (including any agency thereof), or any not-for-profit organization if the agreement will: (1) serve a mutual interest of the parties to the agreement in carrying out the programs administered by the Department of the Interior; and (2) all parties will contribute resources to the accomplishment of these objectives. At the discretion of the Secretary, such agreements shall not be subject to a competitive process.

(Pub. L. 111–88, div. A, title I, §112, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2928.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is from the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3119 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on carfentazone ethyl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on carfentazone 

ethyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARFENTAZONE ETHYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9901.01.54 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 carfentazone ethyl) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 3119 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### SUBCHAPTER VI—DESIGNATED MANAGEMENT AREAS
### §3a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 5, 1942, ch. 336, §1, 56 Stat. 312, provided for assistant or deputy commissioners of the General Land Office and Bureau of Indian Affairs. Insofar as it related to the General Land Office it was superseded by Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, set out as a note under section 1 of this title. Provisions unaffected by the Plan relating to the Bureau of Indian Affairs are set out as section 2a of Title 25, Indians.
|                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                         |  |  |
|                                                    |   |   |
| Ruckus Wireless International, Inc.                     |   | Delaware |
| Ruckus Wireless Brasil Representacoes LTDA              |   | Brazil |
| Ruckus Wireless Network Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |   | China |
| Ruckus Wireless Private Limited                         |   | India |
| Ruckus Wireless IL Limited                              |   | Israel |
| Ruckus Wireless Japan GK                                |   | Japan |
| Ruckus Wireless UK Limited                              |   | United Kingdom |
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALBERTO ROCHA, Ph.D.,

Plaintiff(s),

    vs.

HILDA L. SOLIS,  Secretary,  Department of Labor,

Defendant(s).                                                                                       /

No.08-3049 MHP

JUDGMENT

This matter having been deemed unopposed and submitted on the papers on a motion

for summary judgment, the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel, United States District Judge presiding,

and the papers and record herein having been reviewed and an order having been duly filed granting

the motion and dismissing the action, now therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant’s motion for summary

judgment is GRANTED this action is DISMISSED in its entirety.

Date: April 15, 2010                                                         MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03049-MHP   Document 66   Filed 04/15/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-11T20:11:07-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO