alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1471a. Availability of appropriations for emergency repair or replacement of damaged or destroyed facilities and equipment

Appropriations in this title 1 or appropriations made under this title 1 in subsequent Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts shall on and after October 2, 1992, be available for expenditure or transfer (within each bureau or office), with the approval of the Secretary, for the emergency reconstruction, replacement, or repair of aircraft, buildings, utilities or other facilities or equipment damaged, rendered inoperable, or destroyed by fire, flood, storm, drought, or other unavoidable causes: Provided, That no funds shall be made available under this authority until funds specifically made available to the Department of the Interior for emergencies shall have been exhausted.

(Pub. L. 102–377, title II, §201, Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1331.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title II of Pub. L. 102–377, Oct. 2, 1992, 106 Stat. 1327. For complete classification of title II to Code, see Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Agricultural Chemical Usage - Swine and Swine Facilities            NASS

----

Frequency of Release:Not Specified

----

Category:Agriculture Economics and Management:Production PracticesAnimals and Animal Products:Livestock

Keywords:agrochemicalsinsecticidespest managementswinetopical application

----

## Releases

| Dec 20, 2006 | PDFTXTZIP | Dec 20, 2006: Agricultural Chemical Usage - Swine and Swine Facilities detailsx                Dec 20, 2006: Agricultural Chemical Usage - Swine and Swine FacilitiesRelease datetime:Dec 20, 2006Close |
|--------------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
### §2501. "Suspended entries of public lands" and "suspended preemption land claims"

The Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate, is authorized to decide upon principles of equity and justice, as recognized in courts of equity, and in accordance with regulations to be approved by the Secretary of the Interior, consistently with such principles, all cases of suspended entries of public lands and of suspended preemption land claims, and to adjudge in what cases patents shall issue upon the same.

(R.S. §2450; Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 244; Sept. 20, 1922, ch. 350, 42 Stat. 857; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1161 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

R.S. §2450 derived from acts Aug. 3, 1846, ch. 78, §1, 9 Stat. 51; Mar. 3, 1853, ch. 152, §1, 10 Stat. 258; June 26, 1856, ch. 47, 11 Stat. 22; June 1, 1874, ch. 200, 18 Stat. 50; Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 244.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate," substituted for "Commissioner of the General Land Office" on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
#### SCHMARDER, Respondent, v. MIX, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 27, 1903.)

Action by Barbara Schmarder against Charles W. Mix.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that the defective allegations of the complaint were cured by amendment properly made upon the trial; that upon the case made by the plaintiff the defendants, Mix and Leonard, are liable; that the circular, Exhibit 8, received as against Mix, was competent as evidence of the contents of similar advertising matter, which Mix testifies he had sent out, which advertising matter does not appear to have been sent out subsequent to the transactions had with the plaintiff and her assignors.
1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

111

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

11

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

11111 1111

1

11 1 1

1

1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1 1

1

1

11

1

1

1

11

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

111

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

11

1

11

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

111

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

111 1

1

11

1

1 11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 1 11

1 1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1 1 1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1 1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

1

Fort Berthold Indian Reservation;

North Dakota, US EPA Region 8

£

Disclaimer: EPA makes no claim regarding the accuracy or

precision of these data. Questions concerning the data should

be referred to the source agency. This map does not

necessarily represent EPA's position on any Indian Country

boundaries or the jurisdictional status of any specific location.

Date: June 27, 2012

Map Projection: UTM, Meters, Zone 13N,NAD83.

Data Sources:

Reservations - U.S. Census Bureau (2009);

Counties - U.S. Census Bureau (2009);

NAtive American Pop- U.S. Census Bureau Block Groups (2010);

Base - Microsoft Bing web service (2012).

1 Proposed Gas Wells

Fort Berthold Indian Reservation

Percent Native American

0% to 25%

25% to 50%

50% to 75%

75% to 100%

Area Enlarged

0 1.75 3.5 7 10.5 Miles

0 4 8 16 Kilometers

Lake Sakakawea
#### § 3280.112 Hallways.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75744, Sept. 16, 2024.

Hallways shall have a minimum horizontal dimension of 28 inches measured from the interior finished surface to the interior finished surface of the opposite wall. When appliances are installed in a laundry area, the measurement shall be from the front of the appliance to the opposite finished interior surface. When appliances are not installed and a laundry area is provided, the area shall have a minimum clear depth of 27 inches in addition to the 28 inches required for passage. In addition, a notice of the available clearance for washer/dryer units shall be posted in the laundry area. Minor protrusions into the minimum hallway width by doorknobs, trim, smoke alarms or light fixtures are permitted.

[40 FR 58752, Dec. 18, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 20679, Apr. 6, 1979, and further redesignated at 58 FR 55004, Oct. 25, 1993; 67 FR 12817, Mar. 19, 2002]
#### Orlando Porretto et al., Copartners Doing Business as B. & J. Contracting Co., Respondents, v. Beth Jehudah Otzar Halocho et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion by defendant Beth Jehudah Otzar Halocho for leave to appeal to this court from an order of the Appellate Term, granted. Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 3282
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3282 appear at 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013.

§ 3282.309 Formal and informal presentations of views held by SAAs. ( a ) When an SAA is the appropriate agency to hold a Formal or Informal Presentation of Views under § 3282.412 of subpart I, the SAA shall follow the procedures set out in §§ 3282.152 and 3282.153, with the SAA acting as the Secretary otherwise would under that section. Where § 3282.152 requires publication of notice in the Federal Register, the SAA shall, to the maximum extent possible, provide equivalent notice throughout the State by publication in the newspaper or newspapers having statewide coverage or otherwise. The determination of whether to provide an Informal Presentation of Views under § 3282.152(f), or a Formal Presentation of Views under § 3282.152(g), is left to the SAA.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 3282.152(f)(2) and (g)(2) relating to the conclusive effect of a final determination, any party, in a proceeding held at an SAA under this section, including specifically the owners of affected manufactured homes, States in which affected manufactured homes are located, consumer groups representing affected owners and manufacturers (but limited to parties with similar substantial interest) may appeal to the Secretary in writing any Final Determination by an SAA which is adverse to the interest of that party. This appeal on the record shall be made within 30 days of the date on which the Final Determination was made by the SAA.
[41 FR 19852, May 13, 1976, as amended at 51 FR 34468, Sept. 29, 1986; 78 FR 60199, Oct. 1, 2013]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Calpine Generating Company, LLC, CalGen Expansion
Company, LLC, Baytown Energy Center, LP, Calpine Baytown Energy Center GP, LLC, Calpine Baytown
Energy Center LP, LLC, Baytown Power GP, LLC, Baytown Power, LP, Carville Energy LLC, Channel
Energy Center, LP, Calpine Channel Energy Center GP, LLC, Calpine Channel Energy Center LP, LLC,
Channel Power GP, LLC, Channel Power, LP, Columbia Energy LLC, Corpus Christi Cogeneration LP,
Nueces Bay Energy LLC, Calpine Northbrook Southcoast Investors, LLC, Calpine Corpus Christi Energy
GP, LLC, Calpine Corpus Christi Energy, LP, Decatur Energy Center, LLC, Delta Energy Center, LLC,
CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company Two, LLC, Freestone Power Generation LP, Calpine
Freestone, LLC, CPN Freestone, LLC, Calpine Freestone Energy GP, LLC, Calpine Freestone Energy, LP,
Calpine Power Equipment LP, Los Medanos Energy Center, LLC, CalGen Project Equipment Finance
Company One, LLC, Morgan Energy Center, LLC, Pastoria Energy Facility L.L.C., Calpine Pastoria
Holdings, LLC, Calpine Oneta Power, L.P. , Calpine Oneta Power I, LLC, Calpine Oneta Power II, LLC,
Zion Energy LLC, CalGen Project Equipment Finance Company Three LLC, CalGen Equipment Finance
Holdings, LLC and CalGen Equipment Finance Company, LLC on Form 10-K for the period ending December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge, based upon a review of
the Report: (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company. /s/ Peter Cartwright
    
    /s/ Robert D. KellyPeter Cartwright
    
    Robert D. KellyChief
Executive Officer and President
Calpine Generating Company
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Calpine Generating Company
 Dated: April 15, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Calpine
Generating Company, LLC and will be retained by Calpine Generating Company, LLC and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 275 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 275

       To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
 Reconciliation Act of 1996 to allow States and localities to provide 
            primary and preventive care to all individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
 Reconciliation Act of 1996 to allow States and localities to provide 
            primary and preventive care to all individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING STATES AND LOCALITIES TO PROVIDE PRIMARY AND 
              PREVENTIVE CARE TO ALL INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 411(b)(1) of the Personal Responsibility 
and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1621(b)(1)) 
is amended by inserting ``or for primary and preventive care'' after 
``Act)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to primary and preventive care furnished before, on, or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### FRANKEL, Respondent, v. STOCKMAN et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Thirteenth District. .Action by Isador Frankel against Samuel Stockman arid another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed. Ignace Irving Apfel, for appellants. Charles Frankel, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The evidence fails to show either an actual or an implied agreement on the part of defendants to pay plaintiff for services rendered to Schwartz. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

CASE NO. C 09-01152 SI

Greg L. Lippetz (State Bar No. 154228) 

glippetz@jonesday.com

Cora L. Schmid (State Bar No. 237267) 

JONES DAY 

1755 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: 650-739-3939 

Facsimile: 650-739-3900 

Attorneys for Defendant Maxim 

Integrated Products, Inc., 

David N. Kuhn (State Bar No. 73389) 

Attorney-at-Law 

144 Hagar Avenue 

Piedmont, CA 94611 

Telephone: (510) 653-4983 

E-mail: dnkuhn@pacbell.net 

Attorney for Plaintiff Gregory Bender 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

Gregory Bender, 

Plaintiff, 

v.

Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., 

Defendant.

Case No. C 09-01152 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE DEADLINE FOR 

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED 

INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

Plaintiff Gregory Bender (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., 

(“Defendant”), through their respective counsel, hereby make the following stipulation: 

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2010, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to compel 

infringement contentions that comply with Patent L.R. 3-1, but did not provide a deadline by 

which Plaintiff would serve his Second Amended Infringement Contentions. (Docket No. 54.) 

WHEREAS, the parties agree that Plaintiff’s Second Amended Infringement Contentions 

shall be due on April 21, 2010, which is 30 days following the Court’s Order.

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE THAT: 

 The deadline for Plaintiff to serve his Second Amended Infringement Contentions as 

ordered by the Court in its March 22, 2010 Order shall be April 21, 2010. 

Case 3:09-cv-01152-SI Document 56 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

RE INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 

CASE NO. C 09-01152 SI

Dated: March 30, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

Jones Day 

By: /s/ Gregory Lippetz 

Greg L. Lippetz 

State Bar No. 154228 

JONES DAY 

Silicon Valley Office 

1755 Embarcadero Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94303 

Telephone: 650-739-3939 

Facsimile: 650-739-3900 

Counsel for Defendant Maxim Integrated 

Products, Inc., 

In accordance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B), the above signatory attests that 

concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below. 

Dated: March 30, 2010 By: /s/ David Kuhn 

David N. Kuhn 

Attorney-at-Law 

144 Hagar Avenue 

Piedmont, California 94611 

Telephone: (510) 653-4983 

Counsel for Plaintiff Gregory Bender 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 

DATED: ______________, 2010 By: 

THE HON. SUSAN ILLSTON 

United States District Court Judge 

SVI-79297v1

Case 3:09-cv-01152-SI Document 56 Filed 04/02/10 Page 2 of 2
### §8628. Limitation on use of grants for construction

Grants made under this subchapter may not be used by the State, or by any other person with which the State makes arrangements to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, for the purchase or improvement of land, or the purchase, construction, or permanent improvement (other than low-cost residential weatherization or other energy-related home repairs) of any building or other facility.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title XXVI, §2609, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 902.)
#### EAGER v. DRY DOCK, E. B. & B. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Mary J. Eager against the Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railroad Company. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2919 

To suspend temporarily the duty on diisopropyl succinate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005 

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on diisopropyl succinate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIISOPROPYL SUCCINATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.06 Diisopropyl succinate (CAS 

No. 924–88–9) (provided for 

in subheading 2917.19.70) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2919 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### § 1000.36 How long must a recipient retain records regarding exceptions made to the conflict of interest provisions?

A recipient must maintain all such records for a period of at least 3 years after an exception is made.
Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler

BILL OF COSTS

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00208-CV

Trial Court No. 9490

In the Interest of J.A.R. aka J.A.L., a child

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Clerk's record

Supplemental clerk's record

Reporter's record

Clerk's record

Indigent

Filing

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

$9.00

$37.00

$900.00

$156.00

$25.00

$100.00

$20.00

$50.00

Indigent

Indigent

Rains County

APPELLANT

Indigent

Indigent

Indigent

Indigent

TOTAL: $1,297.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 4th day of May 2015, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
### §1454. Duties of Assistant Secretary and assistant to Secretary

The Assistant Secretary of the Interior shall perform such duties in the Department of the Interior as shall be prescribed by the Secretary, or may be required by law. The assistant to the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to sign such official papers and documents as the Secretary may direct.

(R.S. §439; Mar. 28, 1918, ch. 29, 40 Stat. 499.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §439 derived from act Mar. 14, 1862, ch. 41, §6, 12 Stat. 369.

Section was formerly classified to section 483 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.