alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. DENNIS W ILLIAM LEE, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-30233

D.C . No. 1:14-c r-00104-PA M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for theDistric t of Ore gon Owe n M . Panne r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 25, 2015 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , C LIFTON, a

nd HUR W ITZ, C irc u it Judge s. De nnis W illia

m Le e a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 120-m onth se nte nc e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a fe lon in posse ssion of a fire arm , in viola tion of 18 U.S.C . § 922(g)(1). W e dismi ss. 

# FIL ED SEP 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Le e c onte nds tha t thedistric t c ourt e rre d by im p osing a two-le ve l a djustm e nt for re c kle ss e nda

nge rm e nt during flight unde r U.S.S.G. § 3C 1.2. The gove rnm e nt argue s tha

t thea ppe a l should be

dismisse d ba s e d on a

n a ppe a l wa ive r c onta ine d in the p le a a gre e m e nt. W e re vie w de novo whe the r to e nforc e an a ppe a l wa ive r. Se e U nite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th C ir. 2009). C ontra ry to Le e ’ s c onte ntion, thepa

rtie s’ m utua l m ista

ke of la w c onc e rning whe the r he wa s subje c t to theArm e d C are e r C rim ina l Ac t doe s not re nde r the a ppe a l wa ive r une nforc e a

ble . Se eUnite d State

s v . Transfigurac ion , 442 F.3d 1222, 1229 (9th C ir. 2006) (“ The ina

bility to re s c ind a

ple a a gre e m e nt ba se d on a

m utua l m ista

ke of la w a pplie s to c rim i na l de fe n da nts a s we ll a s to thegove rnm e nt.” ). Furthe r, the re c o rd on a

ppe a l is not suffic ie ntly

de ve lope d

to e va luate whe the r Le e re c e ive d ine ffe c tive a ssista

nc e of tria l c ounse l, nor wa s tria l c ounse l’ s pe rform anc e so ina d e quate tha

t Le e wa s obviously

de nie d his Sixth Ame ndm e nt right to c ounse l. Se eUnite d State

s v . Rahman , 642 F.3d 1257, 1259-60 (9th C ir. 2011) (de c lining to c onside r a

c la im of ine ffe c tivea ssista

nc e of c ounse l on dire c t a ppe a l ra ise d in re sponseto thegove rnm e nt’ s a sse rtion of a n a ppe a l wa i ve r). Ac c ordingly , we dismiss this a

ppe a l in light of the

va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se eW

atson , 582 F.3d a

t 988. DISM I SSE D.

1 4 - 3 0 2 3 3 2
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 229 (Friday, November 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Vaccine Research 
Center Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAID. The meeting will be 
closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual grant applications conducted by the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF 
ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, including consideration of personnel 
qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual 
investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Vaccine Research Center Board of Scientific 
Counselors, NIAID.
    Date: December 15-16, 2020.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 40 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: John R. Mascola, MD, Director, Vaccine Research 
Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 40 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-1852, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#701a1d1103131f1c11301e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="107a7d7163737f7c71507e79783e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 20, 2020.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-26150 Filed 11-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 245.418 Initial submission of materials to HUD: Partial release of mortgage security. In the case of a partial release of mortgage security, the mortgagor must submit the following materials to the local HUD office: ( a ) A statement describing the portion of the property that is proposed to be released and the transaction requiring the release;
( b ) A statement describing the estimated effect of the proposed release on the value of the project, the number of dwelling units in the project, the project income and expenses (including property taxes), the amount of subsidy available to the project, and the project rent schedule;
( c ) A statement describing the proposed use of the property to be released and the persons who will have responsibility for the operation and maintenance of that property, and assessing the compatibility of that use with the residential character of the project;
( d ) A statement describing the proposed use of any proceeds to be received by the mortgagor as a result of the release; and
( e ) A copy of the notice to tenants.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2502-0310)
Fact Sheet

May 3, 2010 | www.mcc.gov

Procurement Opportunities with MCC

USD Billions to Contract Across Countries and Sectors

The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), a development assistance agency of the U.S. Government, 

partners with well-governed countries worldwide to reduce poverty through economic growth. These countries 

propose and then implement MCC grant programs called “compacts.” Compact grants have ranged in size from 

USD 65 million to 698 million. 

Compact grants fund a wide range of projects in infrastructure, agriculture, private sector development, health, 

education, and governance. Each project needs an array of procurements. For example, a compact-funded road 

project might require separate procurements for a project manager, design/environmental/monitoring/evaluation 

consultants, construction contractor, and/or design-build contractor. Over 200 companies and organizations 

across more than 39 countries have won more than 236 Compact-funded contracts to-date. Still, as of September 

2009, current Compact countries have $5.5 billion left to disburse under contracts. 

Compact-funded procurements are conducted by each compact country in accordance with the MCC Program 

Procurement Guidelines, which are based on the World Bank’s procurement guidelines but untied from geographic preferences. These procurements offer the following attractions:

 Subject to MCC oversight and a formal bid challenge system.

 Contractors paid directly from the U.S. Treasury.

 Standard bidding documents and contract formats.

 Evaluation panels of technically qualified experts.

 Up-front commitment of Compact funds (not year-to-year).

 Price reasonableness requirements.

 Typically fixed-price contracts. 

The MCC Program Procurement Guidelines, standard bidding documents, and open, planned, and awarded contracts are all available at http://www.mcc.gov/mcc/procurement/index.shtml. Compact countries are also required 
Procurement Opportunities with MCC, May 3, 2010 2 2010-002-0133-01

to post opportunities to http://mcc.dgmarket.com, http://www.devbusiness.com, national newspapers, and their 

own websites. 

There are two additional types of MCC-funded contracts. MCC contracts directly for project development, independent oversight, and administrative services. In addition, MCC funds what are called “Threshold Programs” that 

help countries qualify for the much larger Compact grants. Both kinds of contracts are subject to the U.S. Federal 

Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and are posted to www.fbo.gov. 

To learn more, please visit www.mcc.gov or email psi@mcc.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000             JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                         608,112               1,576,722
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,605,761               1,388,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (103,142)                (61,973)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,667,516               4,574,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,236,522              10,921,518
<PP&E>                                       9,128,321               7,834,436
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,566,487)             (4,226,704)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,141,987              21,978,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,515,001              10,373,715
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        52,397                  52,397
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,311,037               8,458,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,141,987              21,978,363
<SALES>                                     28,505,114              25,531,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,505,114              25,531,066
<CGS>                                        9,744,564               8,720,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,744,564               8,720,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,093,055              14,117,732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             419,240                 365,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,248,255               2,327,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                   511,769                 966,179
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            736,486               1,361,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   736,486               1,361,567
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17                    0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16                    0.29


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0555 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEPHANIE LYNN LEDOUX,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 22 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2023

12/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0555
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7527

PAUL GRAHAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DISTRICT COURT, for Baltimore County,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(1:06-cv-02038-CCB)

Submitted: January 18, 2007 Decided: January 23, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Graham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Paul Graham appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his complaint. The district court stated that the

document was a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) complaint, but because

Graham is not challenging a conviction or sentence, the claim is

more properly construed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).

Nonetheless, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Graham v. District Court, No. 1:06-cv-02038-CCB

(D. Md. Aug. 22, 2006). We deny Graham’s motions for appointment

of counsel and oral argument. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Notices]               
[Page 38087]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-53]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Wednesday, July 21, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-16187 Filed 6-29-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
### §451b. Irrigation construction charges

#### (a) Credits to entryman

If an entryman making an exchange under the provisions of this subchapter becomes the direct obligor for payment to the United States of irrigation construction charges for his lieu farm unit or undertakes a contract under which the equivalent, in whole or in part, of such charges is returned to the United States, the Secretary, to the extent to which such charges upon the original farm unit or the equivalent thereof have actually been paid to the United States or to an irrigation district or other form of organization under contract with the United States, may give him credit for such charges upon the lieu unit.

#### (b) Credits to district; reduction of costs

If an irrigation district or other form of organization within the boundaries of which is located the lieu farm unit of an entryman making an exchange under the provisions of this subchapter is or becomes the direct obligor for payment to the United States of irrigation construction charges or undertakes or has undertaken a contract under which the equivalent, in whole or in part, of such charges is returned to the United States, the Secretary may, to the extent to which it gives credit to the entryman for such charges or the equivalent thereof actually paid upon the original farm unit, give the district or other form of organization credit for payment of such charges. Upon the making of an exchange pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter, the Secretary may reduce (i) the reimbursable construction costs of the project or division thereof upon which the original farm unit was located by the amount of such costs which were properly assignable to the original farm unit and which were not then due and payable, and (ii) the reimbursable construction costs of the project or division thereof upon which the lieu farm unit is located by the amount of credit which might be given under the provisions of this section.

#### (c) Extension of benefits to districts

In any case in which the benefits of this subchapter are extended to an assignee of an unpatented farm unit or to a resident owner of private lands, as provided in subsection (b) of section 451a of this title, an appropriate extension of benefits may also be made to an irrigation district or other form of organization under subsection (b) of this section.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §3, 67 Stat. 566.)
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of K.A.N.C. and N.A.K.C.,
Children

No. 06

- 14

- 00074

- CV Appeal from the County Court at Law #1 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2013

- 1530

- DR ). Opinion deliv ered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated h er inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 2 3 , 2014
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
### Served: April 7, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation
on the 7 th of April , 2010

Essential Air Service at

ADAK, ALASKA ATKA, ALASKA NIKOLSKI, ALAS KA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET OST

- 2000

- 8556

DOCKET OST

- 1995

- 363

DOCKET OST

- 1995

- 363

NOTICE

By Order 2010

- 2

- 8, February 3, 2010, we requested proposals for EAS at Adak, Atka, and Nikolski, Alaska. We received timely

- filed proposals from Peninsula Airways, Inc., and Alaska Airlines, Inc., and requested comments from the state and communities by April 14. On April 6 the state of Alaska requested an extension to May 5, 2010, to submit comments.

W e have decided to grant the state’s reques t. All comments are now due no later than May 5 , 20 10

.

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.go v
§ 203.380 Certificate of property condition. ( a ) The mortgagee shall either: ( 1 ) Certify that as of the date of the filing of deed for record, or assignment of the mortgage to the Secretary, the property was: ( i ) Undamaged by fire, flood, earthquake, hurricane or tornado; and
( ii ) As to mortgages insured or for which commitments to insure were issued on or after January 2, 1977, undamaged due to failure of the mortgagee to take action as required by § 203.377; and
( iii ) As to mortgages insured under firm commitments issued on or after November 19, 1992, or under direct endorsement processing where the credit worksheet was signed by the mortgagee's underwriter on or after November 19, 1992, undamaged while the property was in the possession of the mortgage; or
( 2 ) Attach to its claim a copy of the Secretary's authorization to convey the property in damaged condition.
( b ) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the mortgagee's certificate or description of the damage shall be accepted by the Secretary as establishing the condition of the property, as of the date of the filing of the deed or assignment of the mortgage.
[57 FR 47973, Oct. 20, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 36265, July 9, 1996; 61 FR 36453, July 10, 1996]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J.Tossavainen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ THOMAS  J. TOSSAVAINEN |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Thomas J. Tossavainen      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer    |   |
| March 14, 2006        |   |

 

----
### **CHAPTER 25A—LANDS HELD UNDER COLOR OF TITLE**

Sec.
1068.
Lands held in adverse possession; issuance of patent; reservation of minerals; conflicting claims.
1068a.
Appraisal.
1068b.
Mineral reservation.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Harold, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on December 5, 1975, unanimously affirmed, and the application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Fein, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.
#### COHNFELD, Respondent, v. TANENBAUM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 10, 1905.)

Action by Charles M. Cohnfeld against Leon Tanenbaum. S. M. Stroock, for appellant. G. Weiffenbach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Cohnfeld v. Tanenbaum, 176 N. Y. 126, 68 N. E. 141, 98 Am. St. Rep. 653. .

VAN BRUNT, P. J., dissents.
#### § 180.200 Designation.

Proceedings under this part shall be presided over by an ALJ appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105.

[61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 13723, Mar. 13, 2008]
No. 89-6756.

#### O. M. *v.*District of Columbia et al.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
### §424b. Application of certain statutes to lands sold

All "permanently unproductive" and "temporarily unproductive" land now or hereafter designated under sections 423 to 423g and 610 of this title, shall, when sold, remain subject to sections 423 and 423b of this title. The exchange provisions of section 423c of this title, shall not be applicable to the land purchased under sections 424 to 424e of this title.

(May 16, 1930, ch. 292, §3, 46 Stat. 367.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 423 to 423g and 610 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "the Act of May 25, 1926", meaning act of May 25, 1926, ch. 383, 44 Stat. 636, which enacted sections 423 to 423g and 610 of this title. Section 610 of this title was omitted from the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
Exhibit 21

                              Subsidiaries of Rand

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        Name of Subsidiary                    State or other               Names under which such
                                      jurisdiction of incorporation       subsidiaries do business
                                             or organization
<S>                                              <C>                <C>
      Rand LL Holdings Corp.                     Delaware                  Rand LL Holdings Corp.

      Lower Lakes Towing Ltd.                     Canada                   Lower Lakes Towing Ltd.

Lower Lakes Transportation Company               Delaware           Lower Lakes Transportation Company

    Grand River Navigation Ltd.                  Delaware               Grand River Navigation Ltd.;
                                                                      GR Nav. (Name used in Michigan)

 Port Dover Steamship Company Inc.                Canada                    Port Dover Steamship
                                                                                 Company Inc.
</TABLE>