alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information from the consolidated
financial statements of Metris Companies Inc. for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0001021061
<NAME>Metris Companies Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         15,844
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               90,796
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        857,322
<ALLOWANCE>                                    450,672
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,076,565
<DEPOSITS>                                     0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   35,103
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            248,006
<LONG-TERM>                                    338,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    205,625
<COMMON>                                       193
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1,076,565
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                41,277
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              207
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               379
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               41,863
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,375
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          32,488
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  39,309
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                93,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35,360
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     21,640
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   21,640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 19.1
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   187,195
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               393,283
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  128,163
<RECOVERIES>                                   6,710
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              450,672
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           450,672
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 RIDGEWAY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

WAL-MART STORES INC,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-05221 SI

Third

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court:

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: n/a at 3:00 p.m.

Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the conference.

DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below.

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is July 7, 2016.

DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS:5/13/16; REBUTTAL: 6/3/16. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2).

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is July 7, 2016.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by July 8, 2016; 

Opp. Due July 22, 2016; Reply Due July 29, 2016;

 and set for hearing no later than August 12, 2016 at 9:00 AM.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: September 6, 2016 at 3:30 PM.

JURY TRIAL DATE: September 19, 2016 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor.

TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be 12 days.

SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS:

n/a

The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case,

including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to

serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action.

Dated: 12/8/15 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 242 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3009 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3009

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to enable veterans to transfer 
  from a State veterans home in one State to a State veterans home in 
  another State, on a space-available basis, without a waiting period 
           with respect to establishment of State residency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2005

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to enable veterans to transfer 
  from a State veterans home in one State to a State veterans home in 
  another State, on a space-available basis, without a waiting period 
           with respect to establishment of State residency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``A Guaranteed Home for Our Veterans 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR VETERANS TO TRANSFER FROM A STATE VETERANS HOME 
              IN ONE STATE TO A STATE VETERANS HOME IN ANOTHER STATE.

    (a) In General.--(1) Chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end of subchapter V the following new 
section:
``Sec. 1744. Transfers from State home in one State to State home in 
              another State
    ``No payment or grant may be made under this subchapter to a home 
in a State that does not allow a veteran who is a resident of a State 
home in a different State to transfer to a State home in that State, on 
a space-available basis, without a requirement for a waiting period 
with respect to establishment of State residency.''.
    (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1743 the 
following new item:

``1744. Transfers from State home in one State to State home in another 
                            State.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Section 1744 of title 38, United States Code, 
as added by subsection (a), shall apply with respect to payments and 
grants made by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under subchapter V of 
chapter 17 of title 38, United States Code, after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 2, 2020.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topic:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 24, 2020.

Vanessa A. Countryman, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26316 Filed 11-24-20; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
§ 232.580 Application of payments. ( a ) The security instrument shall provide that all monthly payments to be made by the borrower shall be added together and this aggregate amount shall be paid by the borrower upon each monthly payment date in a single payment. The lender shall apply the payment to the following items in the order set forth: ( 1 ) Premium charges under the contract of insurance;
( 2 ) Interest on the loan;
( 3 ) Amortization of the principal of the loan;
( b ) Any deficiency in the amount of any monthly payments required under paragraph (a) of this section shall constitute an event of default and the loan shall further provide for a grace period of 30 days within which time the default must be cured.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.36 Financial reporting requirements.

The mortgagor must comply with the financial reporting requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart H.

[63 FR 46592, Sept. 1, 1998]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLarge-Scale Advanced Prop-Fan (LAP) blade designThis report covers the design analysis of a very thin, highly swept, propeller blade to be used in the Large-Scale Advanced Prop-Fan (LAP) test program. The report includes: design requirements and goals, a description of the blade configuration which meets requirements, a description of the analytical methods utilized/developed to demonstrate compliance with the requirements, and the results of these analyses. The methods described include: finite element modeling, predicted aerodynamic loads and their application to the blade, steady state and vibratory response analyses, blade resonant frequencies and mode shapes, bird impact analysis, and predictions of stalled and unstalled flutter phenomena. Summarized results include deflections, retention loads, stress/strength comparisons, foreign object damage resistance, resonant frequencies and critical speed margins, resonant vibratory mode shapes, calculated boundaries of stalled and unstalled flutter, and aerodynamic and acoustic performance calculations.Document ID19880004715Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsViolette, John A.*(Hamilton Standard Windsor Locks, CT, United States)*Sullivan, William E.*(Hamilton Standard Windsor Locks, CT, United States)*Turnberg, Jay E.*(Hamilton Standard Windsor Locks, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-174790HSER-9246NAS 1.26:174790Accession Number88N14097Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23051Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880004715.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS-WEST, 

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

JOHN BORSOS, GAIL BUHLER, RALPH

CORNEJO, JOAN EMSLIE, MARTI GARZA,

GLENN GOLDSTEIN, EMILY GORDON,

JASON JOHNSON, MARK KIPFER, GABE

KRISTAL, MICHAEL KRIVOSH, PAUL KUMAR,

LAURA KURRE, BARBARA LEWIS, DANIEL

MARTIN, FREJA NELSON, ANDREW REID,

JORGE RODRIGUEZ, SAL ROSSELLI, FRED

SEAVEY, IAN SELDEN, PETER TAPPEINER,

JOHN VELLARDITA, PHYLLIS WILLETT,

AND NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE

WORKERS,

Defendants. /

No. C09-00404 WHA

FIRST REQUEST

FOR ANSWERS

RE BENCH TRIAL

By 5:00 P.M. TODAY, please answer the following questions regarding the

under-submission bench trial, sticking to the trial record without any supplementation. 

Please limit yourself to one- or two-page responses: 

1. On TX 114, whose signatures appear for the union trustee (the

Court cannot make sense of the third one)? 

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 638 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Where in the trial record can the Court find is a helpful explanation

of the scope and purpose of Taft-Hartley funds? 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 26, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 638 Filed 04/26/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 320.10 Financial reporting.

Issuers shall submit to the Association audited annual financial statements within 90 days of their fiscal year end. All financial statements shall include a balance sheet and a statement of operations and cash flows. The audit shall be conducted in accordance with the standards for financial audits of the U.S. Government Accountability Office's *Government Auditing Standards,* issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.

[72 FR 49125, Aug. 27, 2007]
#### § 15.302 Production of material or provision of testimony prohibited unless approved.

Neither the Department nor any employee of the Department shall comply with any demand for production of material or provision of testimony in a legal proceeding in which the United States is a party, unless the prior approval of the attorney representing the United States has been obtained in accordance with this subpart. This rule does not apply to any legal proceeding in which an employee may be called to participate, either through the production of documents or the provision of testimony, not on official time, as to facts or opinions that are in no way related to material described in § 15.301.

[73 FR 72206, Nov. 26, 2008]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 30, 2018

a1022 

# Order

Clerk October 30, 2018

156866(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156866

COA: 338179

Washtenaw CC: 73

- 006622

- FC

CHESTER A. SHEPARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 27, 2018

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SVETA ARUTUNYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73348

Agency No. A098-144-320

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Sveta Arutunyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration

judge’s decision denying her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility

FILED

JUN 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73348

determination, Sidhu v. INS, 220 F.3d 1085, 1088 (9th Cir. 2000), and we deny the

petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based upon Arutunyan’s submission of a fraudulent birth certificate, see Desta v.

Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir. 2004) (fraudulent documents going to the

heart of the claim may justify an adverse credibility finding), the omission from

Arutunyan’s testimony of election activities that according to her asylum

application led her 2003 beating and detention, see Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959,

962 (9th Cir. 2004), and Arutunyan’s misidentification of her party’s candidate

during the 2003 elections, see id. In the absence of credible testimony,

Arutunyan’s asylum claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th

Cir. 2003). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### §1655. Roads and airports

A right-of-way, permit, lease, or other authorization granted under section 1652(b) of this title for a road or airstrip as a related facility of the trans-Alaska pipeline may provide for the construction of a public road or airstrip.

(Pub. L. 93–153, title II, §206, Nov. 16, 1973, 87 Stat. 588.)
### §1223. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 900, §3, 68 Stat. 790, which provided that nothing in former sections 1221 to 1223 of this title would affect valid existing rights, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §509a. Project beneficiaries

#### (a) Notice of modification

On identifying a Bureau of Reclamation facility for modification, the Secretary shall provide to the project beneficiaries written notice—

(1) describing the need for the modification and the process for identifying and implementing the modification; and

(2) summarizing the administrative and legal requirements relating to the modification.

#### (b) Consultation

The Secretary shall—

(1) provide project beneficiaries an opportunity to consult with the Bureau of Reclamation on the planning, design, and construction of the proposed modification; and

(2) in consultation with project beneficiaries, develop and provide timeframes for the consultation described in paragraph (1).

#### (c) Alternatives

(1) Prior to submitting the reports required under section 509 of this title, the Secretary shall consider any alternative submitted in writing, in accordance with the timeframes established under subsection (b), by a project beneficiary that has elected to consult with the Bureau of Reclamation on a modification.

(2) The Secretary shall provide to the project beneficiary a timely written response describing proposed actions, if any, to address the recommendation.

(3) The response of the Secretary shall be included in the reports required by section 509 of this title.

#### (d) Waiver

The Secretary may waive 1 or more of the requirements of subsections (a), (b), and (c), if the Secretary determines that implementation of the requirement could have an adverse impact on dam safety or security.

(Pub. L. 95–578, §5A, as added Pub. L. 108–439, §2(b), Dec. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 2627.)