alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,049
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,745,277
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    297,290,297
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             307,064,447
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,890,625
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             79,199
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 287,094,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             307,064,447
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             16,424,389
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               136,225
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            16,560,614
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,109
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       16,556,505
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,043,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,526,966
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  15,526,966
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                15,516,498
<EPS-BASIC>                                  38,446.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    893,985
<LOANS-PAST>                                   499,205
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                40,333
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,333
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### § 203.267 Duration of periodic MIP.

The mortgagee shall pay the MIP to the Commissioner until the deed to the Commissioner is filed for record or the contract of insurance is terminated.

[48 FR 28805, June 23, 1983]
Summary of Independent Director Compensation Policy



  
 Exhibit 10.6

 The Company’s updated independent director compensation policy provides that independent directors receive an annual
retainer of $22,500 for service on our board of directors, $1,500 per in-person scheduled board meeting (whether attended in person or telephonically) and $750 per telephonic board meeting. The chairmen of our audit committee, compensation committee
and nominating and corporate governance committee receive an additional annual retainer of $12,000, $7,500 and $5,000, respectively. Independent directors who serve on committees receive $1,000 per committee meeting attended. Independent directors
are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending board of directors meetings, committee meetings and stockholder meetings. In addition, upon election or appointment as a director and annually thereafter at such time as is determined by
our nominating and corporate governance committee, each independent director is entitled to receive restricted shares of our common stock valued at $10,000, which vest equally over a three-year period. The foregoing independent director compensation
is subject to review and adjustment on the recommendation of our nominating and corporate governance committee. 

  
 40
#### § 291.560 Ineligibility of multiple-unit properties.

Only single-unit properties are eligible for the GNND Sales Program.
|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and  |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the Company.  |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      June 9, 2009 |   | /s/ MARK      RENTSCHLER                                     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   | Mark Rentschler                                              |   |
|                     |   | Chief      Executive Officer, Treasurer,      Principal Financial |   |
|                     |   | Officer      and Principal Accounting Officer                |   |
### §316i. Assignment of leases

The lessee may, with the approval of the Secretary, assign in whole or in part any lease, and to the extent of such assignment be relieved from any liability in respect of such lease, accruing subsequent to the effective date of such assignment.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 513, §10, 44 Stat. 1453.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 471i of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2852 

To extend the suspension of duty on Tetraacetylethylenediamine. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on 

Tetraacetylethylenediamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAACETYLETHYLENEDIAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.70 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Tetraacetylethylenediamine) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2852 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 201.15 Late charges to borrowers. ( a ) *Imposition of late charge.* The note may provide for imposition of a late charge unless precluded by State law. The late charge may be imposed only for installments of principal and interest which are in arrears for the greater of 15 calendar days or the number of days required by applicable State law before such a charge may be imposed. Late charges must be billed to the borrower or reflected in the payment coupon, and evidence of any late charges that have been paid must be in the loan file if an insurance claim is made.
( b ) *Amount of late charge.* The late charge shall not exceed the lesser of five percent of each installment of principal and interest, up to a maximum of $10 per installment for any property improvement loan and $15 per installment for any manufactured home loan, or the maximum amount permitted by applicable State law.
( c ) *Method of payment.* Payment of any late charge cannot be deducted from the monthly payment for principal and interest, but must be an additional charge to the borrower.
( d ) *Daily interest in lieu of late charges.* In lieu of late charges, the note may provide for interest to accrue on installments in arrears on a daily basis at the interest rate in the note.
[54 FR 36264, Aug. 31, 1989]
§ 242.6 Property requirements. The mortgage, to be eligible for insurance, shall be on property located in a state, as defined in § 242.1. The mortgage shall cover real estate in which the mortgagor has one of the following interests: ( a ) A fee simple title;
( b ) A lease for not less than 99 years that is renewable; or
( c ) A lease having a term of not less than 50 years to run from the date the mortgage is executed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILIP GEORGY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-02531 SI

SECOND

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court:

DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below.

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is May 28, 2010.

DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 7/30/10; REBUTTAL: 8/6/10. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2).

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is August 31, 2010.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by June 11, 2010; 

Opp. Due June 25, 2010; Reply Due July 2, 2010;

 and set for hearing no later than July 16, 2010 at 9:00 AM.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: September 14, 2010 at 3:30 PM.

JURY TRIAL DATE: September 20, 2010 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor.

TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days.

SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS:

The Court adjusted the litigation schedule as indicated above.

The parties shall inform the Court of the name of the mediator by March 15, 2010, and complete the

private mediation session between May 28, 2010 and June 11, 2010.

The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case,

including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to

serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action. 

Dated: 

 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-02531-SI Document 22 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 1
### §1061. Inclosure of or assertion of right to public lands without title

All inclosures of any public lands in any State or Territory of the United States, heretofore or to be hereafter made, erected, or constructed by any person, party, association, or corporation, to any of which land included within the inclosure the person, party, association, or corporation making or controlling the inclosure had no claim or color of title made or acquired in good faith, or an asserted right thereto by or under claim, made in good faith with a view to entry thereof at the proper land office under the general laws of the United States at the time any such inclosure was or shall be made, are declared to be unlawful, and the maintenance, erection, construction, or control of any such inclosure is forbidden and prohibited; and the assertion of a right to the exclusive use and occupancy of any part of the public lands of the United States in any State or any of the Territories of the United States, without claim, color of title, or asserted right as above specified as to inclosure, is likewise declared unlawful, and prohibited.

(Feb. 25, 1885, ch. 149, §1, 23 Stat. 321.)
Exhibit 23.2















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board of Directors


PSB Holdings, Inc.








We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated September 4, 2008, related to the consolidated statements of financial condition of PSB Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the
year then ended, which report appears in the June 30, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of PSB Holdings, Inc.







graphicWHITTLESEY & HADLEY, P.C.





September 25, 2009


Hartford, Connecticut
U.S. International Trade Commission

Publication 4150 December 2010

Washington, DC 20436

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-623

Certain R-134a Coolant (Otherwise 

Known as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane)
U.S. International Trade Commission

COMMISSIONERS 

Shara L. Aranoff, Chairman 

Daniel R. Pearson, Vice Chairman 

Deanna Tanner Okun 

Charlotte R. Lane 

Irving A. Williamson 

Dean A. Pinkert 

Address all communications to 

Secretary to the Commission 

United States International Trade Commission 

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436 

www.usitc.gov

Publication 4150 December 2010

In the Matter of

Investigation No. 337-TA-623

Certain R-134a Coolant (Otherwise 

Known as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane)
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  a)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Famous Daves of America, Inc. for the
quarter ended July 4, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Famous Daves of America, Inc.
 Dated:  August 12, 2010
    By:
    /s/Christopher ODonnellChristopher ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  August 12, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Diana Garvis PurcelDiana Garvis PurcelChief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation & Order Rescheduling Sentencing Hearing - 1 -

GEORGE J. COTSIRILOS, JR., SBN 83255

COTSIRILOS & CAMPISANO LLP

250 Montgomery Street

Suite 1100

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 397-2373

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO VENUE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

ZHIJIAN WU,

Defendants.

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

 )

No. CR 09-0824 MMC

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER

RESCHEDULING SENTENCING OF

ZHIJIAN WU FOR SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

The parties submit the instant Stipulation and Order seeking to continue the sentencing

of defendant Zhijian Wu from August 25, 2010 to September 8, 2010. 

The parties agree that a continuance is necessary to allow the probation department to

complete its presentence investigation of this complex, multiple-defendant matter. Because of

complications emanating from the parties’ calendars during the summer months, the need to

identify and properly comprehend extensive relevant case facts related to this and other

defendants, and the need to allow for defense counsel to be present at the presentence interview,

now scheduled for July 27, 2010, the presentence investigation is not yet complete. 

The parties have consulted with the Court clerk and the probation officer and confirmed

that September 8, 2010 is an available date agreeable to the parties and the probation department.

Case 3:09-cr-00824-MMC Document 68 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation & Order Rescheduling Sentencing Hearing - 2 -

Accordingly, good cause appearing, and the parties having stipulated thereto, the

sentencing hearing for defendant Zhijian Wu, currently scheduled for August 25, 2010, shall be

rescheduled and held on September 8, 2010 at 2:30 p.m.

SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 26, 2010 /S/

KYLE S.WALDINGER

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: July 26, 2010 /S/

GEORGE J. COTSIRILOS, JR.

Attorney for Defendant

Zhijian Wu

SO ORDERED.

Dated:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

July 27, 2010 /s/ Charles R. Breyer for Maxine M. Chesney

Case 3:09-cr-00824-MMC Document 68 Filed 07/27/10 Page 2 of 2
#### HALLAHAN et al., Respondents, v. NICHOLSBURG et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by John Hallaban and another against Henry Nicholsburg and another. J. Rosenzweig, for appellants." J. A. Farley, for respondents. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 241.1230 No vested right in fund.

Neither the lender nor the borrower shall have any vested or other right in the insurance fund under which the loan is insured.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Yearly Report of Blackhawk Capital Group BDC,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert M. Fujii, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
      Robert M. FujiiRobert
      M. Fujii, Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      30, 2005
Amendment No. 1 to Advisory Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE 

ADVISORY AGREEMENT 
 This amendment no. 1 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of October 8, 2010 (the “Advisory Agreement”) between KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
“Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of November 9, 2010 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the
meaning set forth in the Advisory Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Advisor desire to amend the definition of
“Sale” in the Advisory Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree that the definition of “Sale” in the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

“Sale” means any transaction or series of transactions whereby: (A) the Company or the Partnership sells, grants,
transfers, conveys, or relinquishes its ownership of any Property, Loan or other Permitted Investment or portion thereof, including the transfer of any Property that is the subject of a ground lease, including any event with respect to any Property,
Loan or other Permitted Investment that gives rise to a significant amount of insurance proceeds or condemnation awards, and including the issuance by one of the Company’s subsidiaries of any asset-backed securities or collateralized debt
obligations as part of a securitization transaction; (B) the Company or the Partnership sells, grants, transfers, conveys, or relinquishes its ownership of all or substantially all of the interest of the Company or the Partnership in any Joint
Venture or any partnership in which it is a partner; or (C) any Joint Venture or any partnership in which the Company or the Partnership is a partner, sells, grants, transfers, conveys, or relinquishes its ownership of any Property, Loan or
other Permitted Investment or portion thereof, including any event with respect to any Property, Loan or other Permitted Investment that gives rise to insurance claims or condemnation awards, and including the issuance by such Joint Venture or any
partnership or one of its subsidiaries of any asset-backed securities or collateralized debt obligations as part of a securitization transaction. 
 Signature page follows. 







  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written. 
  

									
	KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	/s/ Keith D. Hall
		 		 	Keith D. Hall, Chief Executive Officer



									
	
	KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC
			
		 	By:  	 	PBren Investments, L.P., a Manager
				
		 		 	By: 	 	PBren Investments, LLC, as general partner
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Peter M. Bren
		 		 		 		 	Peter M. Bren, Manager
			
		 	By:	 	Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager
				
		 		 	By:	 	Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	/s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
		 		 		 		 	Charles J. Schreiber, Jr., Manager
#### § 910.1 Requests to reopen cases.

The Board may reconsider any decision upon the presentation of newly discovered or previously unavailable material evidence.

[50 FR 31358, Aug. 2, 1985. Redesignated at 56 FR 55460, Oct. 28, 1991]
§ 3285.307 Perimeter support piers. ( a ) Piers required at mate-line supports, perimeter piers, and piers at exterior wall openings are permitted to be constructed of single open-cell or closed-cell concrete blocks, with nominal dimensions of 8 inches × 8 inches × 16 inches, to a maximum height of 54 inches, as shown in Figure A to this section, when the design capacity of the block is not exceeded.
( b ) Piers used for perimeter support must be installed with the long dimension parallel to the perimeter rail.
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; 

CASE NO. 09-2144; PAGE 1 OF 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JESUS GUMBAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

BIG EYE SECURITY, INC., 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Case No. 09-2144 (CRB)

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

Judge Charles R. Breyer 

 

The parties having stipulated to dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to their 

settlement of the claims therein; 

This case is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs 

and attorney fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January ____, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:09-cv-02144-CRB Document 37 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 26.53 Exhaustion of administrative remedies.

In order to fulfill the requirement of exhausting administrative remedies, a party must seek Secretarial review under § 26.52 prior to seeking judicial review of any initial decision issued under subpart B of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 appear at 71 FR 34521 and 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 41.41 Crewmen. ( a ) *Alien classifiable as crewman.* An alien is classifiable as a nonimmigrant crewman upon establishing to the satisfaction of the consular officer the qualifications prescribed by INA 101(a)(15)(D), provided that the alien has permission to enter some foreign country after a temporary landing in the United States, unless the alien is barred from such classification under the provisions of INA 214(f).
( b ) *Alien not classifiable as crewman.* An alien employed on board a vessel or aircraft in a capacity not required for normal operation and service, or an alien employed or listed as a regular member of the crew in excess of the number normally required, shall not be classified as a crewman.
[52 FR 42597, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 66 FR 10364, Feb. 15, 2001]
#### Paul Dooley, Doing Business as Dooley Provision Co., Appellant, v. Thomas Anton et al., Respondents.

Motion to have appeal placed on calendar for February 1961 Term denied.