39–006

105TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 105–13

EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A

HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT LOCATED IN THE STATE OF

WASHINGTON

MARCH 11, 1997.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State

of the Union and ordered to be printed

Mr. BLILEY, from the Committee on Commerce,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H.R. 652]

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]

The Committee on Commerce, to whom was referred the bill

(H.R. 652) to extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for

the construction of a hydroelectric project located in the State of

Washington, and for other purposes, having considered the same,

report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that

the bill do pass.

CONTENTS

Page

Purpose and Summary ............................................................................................ 2

Background and Need for Legislation .................................................................... 2

Hearings ................................................................................................................... 3

Committee Consideration ........................................................................................ 3

Rollcall Votes ............................................................................................................ 3

Committee Oversight Findings ............................................................................... 3

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight ............................................... 3

New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures ...................................................... 3

Committee Cost Estimate ....................................................................................... 3

Congressional Budget Office Estimate ................................................................... 3

Federal Mandates Statement ................................................................................. 4

Advisory Committee Statement .............................................................................. 4

Constitutional Authority Statement ...................................................................... 5

Applicability to Legislative Branch ........................................................................ 5

Section-by-Section Analysis of the Legislation ...................................................... 5

Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported ..................................... 5
2

PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

The purpose of H.R. 652 is to extend the deadline for the commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of

Washington licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

Section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. § 806 (1988)) establishes time limits for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project once FERC has issued a license. The licensee must

begin construction not more than two years from the date the license is issued, unless FERC extends the initial deadline. However,

section 13 permits FERC to grant only one extension of that deadline for ‘‘not longer than two additional years * * * when not incompatible with the public interests.’’ Accordingly, FERC lacks authority to extend the deadline beyond a maximum of two years

from the original deadline for commencement of construction.

Therefore, a license is subject to termination if a licensee fails to

begin construction within four years of the date the license is issued.

Lack of a power sales contract can delay the commencement of

construction of licensed hydroelectric projects. It is very difficult for

a hydroelectric project sponsor to secure financing until it has a

power sales contract, and generally a licensee cannot secure a contract until it has been granted a license. However, the construction

deadline begins to toll once the license is granted. There are other

obstacles to commencement of construction, such as protracted proceedings on a licensee’s application for a dredge and fill permit

from the Army Corps of Engineers under section 404 of the Clean

Water Act. FERC has testified that in such cases it has issued orders staying the license until matters are resolved, suggesting extension legislation is not needed in order to address delays beyond

the control of the licensee.

H.R. 652 would extend the deadline for the commencement of

construction for a 6.3 megawatt hydroelectric project (Project No.

9025) in King County, Washington, for up to three additional twoyear periods. This would extend the deadline to up to ten years

after the date the license was issued. According to the project sponsor, construction has not commenced for lack of a power purchase

agreement. The deadline for the commencement of construction of

this project expires on June 21, 1997. The licensee has invested

about $1.4 million in project development. H.R. 652 does not ease

the requirements of a hydroelectric license, but merely extends the

period for commencement of project construction.

The legislation provides for up to three consecutive two-year extensions, instead of a six-year extension, to assure that the licensee

must continue to meet the section 13 requirement that it prosecute

construction ‘‘in good faith and with due diligence’’ before obtaining

each two-year extension. If FERC determines the licensee is not

prosecuting construction in good faith and with due diligence, the

Committee expects the agency will refuse to grant a request for an

additional two-year extension, terminate the license, and make the

site available for other uses.
3

HEARINGS

The Committee on Commerce has not held hearings on the legislation.

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

On February 26, 1997, the Subcommittee on Energy and Power

met in open markup session and approved H.R. 652 for Full Committee consideration, without amendment, by a voice vote. The Full

Committee met in open markup session on March 5, 1997, and ordered H.R. 652 reported to the House, without amendment, by a

voice vote.

ROLLCALL VOTES

Clause 2(l)(2)(B) of rule XI of the Rules of the House requires the

Committee to list the recorded votes on the motion to report legislation and amendments thereto. There were no recorded votes

taken in connection with ordering H.R. 652 reported. A motion by

Mr. Bliley to order H.R. 652 reported to the House, without amendment, was agreed to by a voice vote, a quorum being present.

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS

Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(A) of rule XI of the Rules of the House

of Representatives, the Committee did not hold oversight or legislative hearings on this legislation.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT

Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(D) of rule XI of the Rules of the House

of Representatives, no oversight findings have been submitted to

the Committee by the Committee on Government Reform and

Oversight.

NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND TAX EXPENDITURES

In compliance with clause 2(l)(3)(B) of rule XI of the Rules of the

House of Representatives, the Committee finds that H.R. 652

would result in no new or increased budget authority or tax expenditures or revenues.

COMMITTEE COST ESTIMATE

The Committee adopts as its own the cost estimate prepared by

the Director of the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section

403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974.

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE ESTIMATE

Pursuant to clause 2(l)(3)(C) of rule XI of the Rules of the House

of Representatives, the following is the cost estimate provided by

the Congressional Budget Office pursuant to section 403 of the

Congressional Budget Act of 1974:
4

U.S. CONGRESS, CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, Washington, DC, March 6, 1997.

Hon. TOM BLILEY,

Chairman, Committee on Commerce,

Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 652, a bill to extend the

deadline under the Federal Power Act for the construction of a hydroelectric project located in the state of Washington, and for other

purposes.

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased

to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Kim Cawley.

Sincerely,

JAMES L. BLUM

(For June E. O’Neill, Director).

Enclosure.

H.R. 652—A bill to extend the deadline under the Federal Power

Act for the construction of a hydroelectric project located in the

state of Washington, and for other purposes

CBO estimates that enacting this bill would have no net effect

on the federal budget. The bill does not contain any intergovernmental or private-sector mandates, and would not impose any costs

on state, local, or tribal governments.

The bill would extend for up to six years the deadline for construction of a hydroelectric project currently subject to licensing by

the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The proposed

extension is for FERC project number 9025. This provision may

have a minor impact on FERC’s workload. Because FERC recovers

100 percent of its costs through user fees, any change in its administrative costs would be offset by an equal change in the fees that

the commission charges. Hence, the bill’s provisions would have no

net budgetary impact.

Because FERC’s administrative costs are limited in annual appropriations, enactment of this bill would not affect direct spending

or receipts. Therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures would not apply to

the bill.

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Kim Cawley. This estimate was approved by Paul Van de Water, Assistant Director for

Budget Analysis.

FEDERAL MANDATES STATEMENT

The Committee adopts as its own the estimate of Federal mandates prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office

pursuant to section 423 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

ADVISORY COMMITTEE STATEMENT

No advisory committees within the meaning of section 5(b) of the

Federal Advisory Committee Act were created by this legislation.
5

CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY STATEMENT

Pursuant to clause 2(l)(4) of rule XI of the Rules of the House

of Representatives, the Committee finds that the Constitutional authority for this legislation is provided in Article I, section 8, clause

3, which grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the several States, and with the Indian tribes.

APPLICABILITY TO LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

The Committee finds that the legislation does not relate to the

terms and conditions of employment or access to public services or

accommodations within the meaning of section 102(b)(3) of the Congressional Accountability Act.

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION

Section 1. Extension of deadline

This section directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(FERC), upon the request of the licensee for Project No. 9025, in

accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest

requirements of section 13 of the Federal Power Act and FERC’s

procedures under such section, to extend the time required for the

commencement of construction for such project for up to three additional two-year periods. Any such extension will take effect upon

the expiration of the extension previously granted by FERC. If the

license has expired prior to the date of enactment of H.R. 652 and

FERC extends the deadline for the commencement of construction,

the section directs FERC to reinstate the license effective upon the

date of its expiration.

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

H.R. 652 does not amend any existing Federal statute.

Æ