alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

PrincipalFinancial Officer

 

I, Michael G.Long, certify that:

 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofEdge Petroleum Corporation (the “registrant”).

 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a)                    Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)                   Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)                    Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions);

 

(a)                    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)                   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:     August 13, 2004 | /s/  Michael G. Long |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|                                     |                 | Michael  G. Long |
|                                     |                 | Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

USA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BHAMBRA,

Defendant.

Case No. 09-cr-01088-SI-1 

ORDER OF RECUSAL

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

I, the undersigned judge of the Court, finding myself disqualified in the above-entitled 

action, hereby recuse myself from this case and request that the case be reassigned.

All pending dates of motions, pretrial conferences and trial are hereby vacated and will be 

reset by the newly assigned judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 8, 2016

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cr-01088-EMC Document 219 Filed 06/08/16 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Pub. L. 95-541. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 9, 2004, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on December 14, 2004 to: Rennie S. Holt; Permit No. 2005-013.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-27761 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### DINGER et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 20, 1905.)

Action by August Dinger and Josephine Dinger against the city of New York. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Smith, J., at Special Term. 86 N. Y. Supp. 577.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76567-76568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26417]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of 
Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, December 10, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via teleconference.

[[Page 76568]]


STATUS: The meeting will be open to public observation by 
teleconference only.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. Review of EXIM's Medium- and Long-Term (MLT) Reachback Policy
2. Local Cost Support for Short Term (ST) Insurance and Working Capital 
Transactions

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). 
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via audio only 
teleconference should register via https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7605082646858648589 by noon Wednesday, December 9, 2020. 
Individuals will be directed to a Webinar registration page and 
provided call-in information.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26417 Filed 11-25-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK JACKSON, et al.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-01016 WHA

ORDER TO JURY COMMISSIONER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United Sates District Court Jury Commissioner shall

furnish daily refreshments for the members of the jury in the above-entitled matter and during the

deliberation lunch shall be furnished for the members of the jury at the expense of the United States

District Court Jury Commissioner.

Dated: July 12, 2010 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 190 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 1
1

________________________________________________________________________________

CHANEL, ET AL. V. BOSINI, ET AL.: STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881)

Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235)

J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp.

517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202

Glendale, California 91206

Telephone: (818) 500-3200

Facsimile: (818) 500-3201

andy@coombspc.com

nicole@coombspc.com

Stephen M. Gaffigan (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Stephen M. Gaffigan, P.A.

401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 130-453

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Telephone: (954) 767-4819

Facsimile: (954) 767-4821

stephen@smgpa.net

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Chanel, Inc. and Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANEL, INC., a New York corporation 

and LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER, 

S.A., a foreign business entity,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TONY BOSINI and DOES 1-10, 

individually and jointly, d/b/a 

REPLICAMASTER.COM,

SHOPREPLICA.COM, 

BUYHIGHREPLICA.COM, 

EREPLICABAGS.COM, 

EXACTWATCHES.NET, 

REPLICAHOURS.COM, 

SWISSREPLICA.US, 

THEWATCHESPRICEINDEX.INFO, and

YOURREPLICAWATCH.COM,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-09-1972 MHP

STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, CHANEL, INC., a New York corporation ("Chanel") and LOUIS VUITTON 

MALLETIER, S.A. (“Louis Vuitton”), and the Defendant Tony Bosini (“Bosini”), by and through 

Case 3:09-cv-01972-BZ Document 45 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 2
2

_________________________________________________________________________________

CHANEL, ET AL. V. BOSINI, ET AL.: STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED 

COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to the filing of the attached First Amended Complaint.

SO STIPULATED:

Plaintiffs: Chanel, Inc. and Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.

By their Attorney: STEPHEN M. GAFFIGAN, P.A.,

A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

By: s:/Stephen M. Gaffigan

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Chanel, Inc. and Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A.

Defendants: Tony Bosini d/b/a Replicamaster.com, Shopreplica.com, Buyhighreplica.com, 

Ereplicabags.com, Exactwatches.net, Replicahours.com, Swissreplica.US, 

Thewatchespriceindex.info, and Yourreplicawatch.com

By his Attorney: LAW OFFICE OF AYAL ABRAMS

By:___/s Ayal Abrams______________________

Ayal Abrams

600 Page Street, #101

San Francisco, California 94117

Telephone: (415) 994-2437

Facsimile: (415) 358-4951

Attorneys for Defendant

Tony Bosini

SO ORDERED this _______ day of _____________, 2010.

___________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies furnished to:

All parties of record

19th January UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01972-BZ Document 45 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 2
### §390kk. Residency not required

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, irrigation water made available from the operation of reclamation project facilities shall not be withheld from delivery to any project lands for the reason that the owners, lessees, or operators do not live on or near them.

(Pub. L. 97–293, title II, §211, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1269.)
### §8143. Definitions

For the purpose of this subchapter—

(1) the terms "art" and "arts" include, but are not limited to, architecture (including preservation, restoration, or adaptive use of existing structures), landscape architecture, urban design, interior design, graphic arts, fine arts (including painting and sculpture), performing arts (including music, drama, and dance), literature, crafts, photography, communications media and film, as well as other similar activities which reflect the cultural heritage of the Nation's communities and their citizens;

(2) the term "nonprofit organization" means an organization in which no part of its net earnings inures to the benefit of any private stockholder or stockholders, individual or individuals and, if a private entity, which is not disqualified for tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of title 26 by reason of attempting to influence legislation and does not participate in or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution of statements) any political campaign on behalf of any candidate for public office; such organizations may include States and units of local government (including public agencies or special authorities thereof), regional organizations of local governments and nonprofit societies, neighborhood groups, institutions, organizations, associations or museums;

(3) the term "project" means a program or activity intended to carry out the purposes of this subchapter, including programs for neighborhood and community-based arts programs, urban design, user needs design, and the encouragement of the preservation of historic or other structures which have neighborhood or community significance;

(4) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;

(5) the term "Chairman" means the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts;

(6) the term "Department" means the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and

(7) the term "Endowment" means the National Endowment for the Arts.

(Pub. L. 95–557, title VIII, §804, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2122; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Par. (2). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKELA MINACIS,

Plaintiff(s),

 vs.

INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES,

Defendant(s). /

NO: C-09-1653 MHP (MEJ)

NOTICE AND ORDER RESCHEDULING 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case shall be rescheduled for a Settlement Conference

before Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. The Plaintiff in this matter shall contact the

Court regarding further settlement dates as the Settlement Conference previously scheduled for April

16, 2010 has been vacated. 

Please contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Brenda Tolbert, at (415) 522-4708 with any questions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 7, 2010 

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01653-MHP Document 39 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 1
### §1181e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1181e was editorially reclassified as section 2604 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6202

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT SHERWOOD SCOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-92-14, CA-95-1966-2-8)

Submitted: October 1, 1996 Decided: October 22, 1996

Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Sherwood Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Scott, Nos. CR-92-14; CA-95-1966-2-8 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - 50 CFR Part 665
          - [RTID 0648-XA683]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Announcement of a valid specified fishing agreement; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        NMFS published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of November 23, 2020, announcing a valid specified fishing agreement that allocates up to 1,000 metric tons (t) of the 2020 bigeye tuna limit for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) to U.S. longline fishing vessels. The document incorrectly referred to American Samoa.                    

# DATES:

December 2, 2020.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lynn Rassel, NMFS PIRO Sustainable Fisheries, 808-725-5184.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

### Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of November 23, 2020, in FR Doc. 2020-25806, on page 74615, in the first column, correct the second sentence of the                     **DATES**                     caption to read: The start date for attributing 2020 bigeye tuna catch to the CNMI was November 15, 2020.                

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: November 24, 2020.

Jennifer M. Wallace,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2020-26363 Filed 12-1-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 26, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ MICHAEL J. GREBE Michael J. Grebe Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 25, 2009


---



QuickLinks
§ 26.9 Form and filing requirements. ( a ) *Filing.* Unless otherwise provided by statute, rule, or regulation: ( 1 ) Requests for hearings shall be filed with the Office of General Counsel's Docket Clerk, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410. The OGC Docket Clerk shall assign the docket number and forward the case to HUD's Office of Hearings and Appeals.
( 2 ) All other pleadings, submissions, and documents should be filed directly with the appropriate hearing officer.
( 3 ) Filing may be made by first class mail, delivery, facsimile transmission, or electronic means; however, the hearing officer may place reasonable limits on filing by facsimile or electronic means. Duplicate copies are not required unless so ordered by the hearing officer. A document is considered timely filed if postmarked on or before the date due or delivered to the appropriate person by the date due.
( b ) *Title.* Documents shall show clearly the title of the action and the docket number assigned by the Docket Clerk.
( c ) *Form.* To the fullest extent possible, all documents shall be printed or typewritten in clear, legible form.
[73 FR 76833, Dec. 17, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022]
Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 63 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 63 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 63 Filed 05/06/10 Page 3 of 3
Jfourtf) Court of

is>an Antonio, TEexasf

August 1,2014

No. 04-13-00751-CR

Roland S. Perkins,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

Trial Court Case No. 2012CR5082

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral

argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the

cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on September 10, 2014, to the following panel:

Justice Marion, Justice Barnard, and Justice Chapa. All parties will be notified of the Court's

decision in this appeal in accordance with Tex. R. App. P. 48.

Either party may file motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that

oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues

presented in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Such motion should be filed within ten (10)

days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on August 1, 2014.

Sandee Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and a/fixed the seal o/the said

court on this August 1, 2014.
Exhibit 23.1
   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated September 17, 2009 related to the consolidated balance sheet of PSB Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’
equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the June 30, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of the PSB Holdings, Inc.
   graphicSHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.
 
 
 West Peabody, Massachusetts
 September 25, 2009
   83 PINE STREET ● WEST PEABODY, MASSACHUSETTS 01960-3635 ● TELEPHONE (978) 535-0206 ● FACSIMILE (978) 535-9908smc@shatswell.com

www.shatswell.com