--**-~** -- --**-~** --,­ 01/27/2010 10:53 FAX 2024935142 FAA

... OMS @ 001/008 

# RECEIVED JAN 1 3 

## 2810

# "~l~**~~** HEARING DOCKET

# ~ U$. Department We$tem·Pacific Region P.O. Box 92007 ofTransportation Office of the Regional Counsel Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007**F~eral** Aviation Telephone: (310) 725-7117 Administration Facsimile: (310) 725-6816 

### DEC 30 

### 2009 CERTIFIED MAIL

- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 

# en Attn; nearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430
.. 

# riO \.rJ

# Pobe> l /()CI0

# ~**O{){~** Wilbur Wright 

### Building·· Suite 2WIOOO ''1**-,'~** Rc: In the Matter ofBud Fiske Raymond; Case No. 2009WP210026 Enclosed is a copy ofa request for hearing postmarked December 18, 2009, and the orlginal and one copy ofthe Complaint in the**abovc~referenced** proceeding. I request that the hearing in this matter be 

### held in the 

### Los Angeles. California**ar~a,** and 

### expect that the-bearing will 

### last one (1) 

### day,- ' . PI ease address all communications for the Regional Counsel ofthe Western-Pacific Region, to the undersigned. at: Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7, Federai Aviation**Adm~nistration, We~lem-Pacific**  Region, 

### P.,O. Box 92007, 

### Los Angeles, CA**90009-2007~** Telephone: (310)**725~7117,** FAX: (310) 

### 725-6816. ' Sincerely. NAOMI TSUDA Regional Counsel

.j' " , . \

.**Enclosur~s,:.**

## R:equest for Hearing; Complaint'; 

### tertificate ofService

• j J • • •**~ ~**  • ", 'r

• ,**~** • \. ., • '**~'.'** ' I , ,I ,**~** • '''. NOTE TO**RES"OND~~T:** 

### SECTION**.1~'.209** 

### OF THE CP 

### RULES-Qt"PRACTICE REQUIRE THAT A WRITTEN ANSWER. TO THE 

### COMPLAINT BE"PILED 

### NOT

.LATER Tl-IAl'l30 

### PAY;S AFT:PR SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT. AS AN ALTERNA

## rrVE TO 

### FlUNG. AN**ANSWE~,** 

## AMOTION MAYBE FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13.208(D) OR SECTION '1'f21'8(F)(I

## :4) OP-THE 

## Rtn.R'S' 0F'PRAcnCE
.**~** ..

# .. . . , , , " : ('.. '!:
..:**~** , . ,1 •• f\ : \ t f. •**~',:.** I**~;** (J. A ,; .1 I" -,. t \**~** •**~** wo' r I ••• , I j.,;,\

• j .'

# -- 01/27/2010 10:53 FAX 2024935142 

### FAA + DMS @002/006



### Arthur Wasserman, 

### Esq., 22677 LAW OFFICE OF**ARTHO~** 

### WASSERMAN 16380 

### Roscoe Blvd., Suite 120 

### Van Nuys, California 91406-1221 

### Telephone: (818) 895-8234 

### Facsimile: (818) 895-0675 

### Attorney for Respondent, Bud 

### Fiske Raymond
US DEPARTMENT OF 

### TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF**HEARI~** 

### . WASHINGTON, D,C. ) 

### Administrator I 

### Federal Aviation Administration, ) 

### CASE NO. 2009WP210026 ) 

### Complainant, ) ) ) 

### vs. ) 

### RESPONDENT'S ) 

### REQUEST FOR HEARING Bud Fiske Raymond, ) 

### Respondent. )

## -------------...--------~----~------) BUD PISKE RAYMOND, by his undersigned counsel, pursuant to Section 13.16 of 

### the Federal Aviation regulations, hereby demands a hearing on the Administrator's Order of Civil Penalty dated December 4, 2009, casenumber 2009WP210026, Civil Penalty in the amount of $4,000.00
. 

### Respondent denies the violations alleged in the Administratorls Order 

### and prays that it is 

### reversed. Respondent requests that 

### the hearing be held in Los Angeles, California. Dated: December 18, 2009 

### -:;;· .. ·'/-7

# ."~--_/ //**~ll{fY1** 

### :;%,"
. __..**--~". ~'WASS1ru{AN,** **E~~s~q-.--** 

### Attorney for Respondent.01/27/2010 10:54 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 003/00B

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE 

### OF HEARINGS WASmNGTON, DC



### In the Matter of: FAA DOCKET Bud Fiske Raymond, FAA CASE NO. 2009WP210026 

### Respondent.
JUDGE NOT ASSIGNED 

### COMPLAINT The Complainanl files its Complaint, pursuantto Rule 208 ofthe Rules ofPractice (14 C.F.R. 13.208), and states as follows: 1. Respondent, Bud Fiske Raymond, was advised through an Amended Final**Notif~C** of Proposed Civil 

### Penalty that the FAA proposed 

### to assess a civil penalty in 

### the amount of $4,000.00
. On December 18, 2009, Respondent submitted a written request 

### for a hearing. II. 

### 1. Respondent is now, and at 

### all times mentioned 

### herein was. the owner of an Aero 

### Commander Darter model 100 a.ircraft, civil registration number N269DA.

2. In December 

### of 2008, maintenance was pcrfonned on 

### N269DA. in that it was 

### repainted.

3. On or about December 12, 2008, the Respondent took possession of N269DA before 

### it had been approved for 

### return to service.01/27/2010 10:54 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 004/006
3

4. Respondenttook possession ofN269DA before maintenance personnel made the required entry in the aircraft maintenance records indicating that 

### it was approved for return tQ service.

5. On or about January 24, 2009, Respondent operated N269DA, in that Respondent caused or authori7.ed N269DA to be used for a flight in the vicinity of

### EI Monte, California.

6. When Respondent operated N269DA as referenced in paragraph 5, above, maintenance personnel stm had not approveu N269DA for return to service:.

7. When Respondent operated N269DA as referenced in paragraph 5, above, maintenance personnel still had not made the required enlry in the aircraft maintenance records indicating that it was approved lorrcturnto service.

HI. 'By reason ofthe foregoing facts and circumstances, Respondent violated the following Federal Aviation Regulations (Title 14, Code ofFedera,l Regulations):

a. 14 CFR § 91.407(a)(I), which states that no person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration01/27/2010 10:54 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS 

### III 005/008
4 unless 

### it hI:!!> been approved for return to service by a person authorized under**~** 43.1 ofthis chapter.

b. 14 Cr'R § 91.407(a)(2), which states that no person. may operate any aircraft thal has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless the**n-~aintenance** record entry rcquired by § 43.9 or § 43.11, as applicable, of this chapter has been made.



### IV. 1. Pursuant to Title 49 U.S.C. Section 46301 (a), Respondent is subject to a eivil penalty not to exceed $11,000.00 for each ofthe violations alleged. 2. Under the facts and circumstances ofthis case, a civil penalty 

# of$4,000.00 is appropriate. WHEREFORE, the Complainant, respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge enter an order that Respondent be assessed a civil penalty in the amount of$4,000.00,
Respectfully submitted, 

# 4 - ;f----=--

# ~ {-(Jte-Lierrc Gr Attorney Office ofthe Regiona) Cowlsel Federal Aviation Adminislr'ation 

### Western-Pacific Region
DATED: 

### DEC 30 Z00901/27/2010 10:54 FAX 2024935142 FAA .;. OMS @008/008


### 5
CERTIFICAIE OF SERVICE
I 

### hereby certify that on this date I 

### have sent by 

### facsimile ap.d 

### placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, 

### certified mail

- return 

### receipt requested, 

### the executed original

. and one copy, and 

### faxed one: copy ofthe 

### Complaint, addressed as 

### follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW 

### Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing 

### Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur 

### Wright Building-Suite 2WI000 

### Facsimile: (202) 493-5020

I further certify 

### that on ibis date I have placed in the United 

### States mail, postage prepaid, certified 

### mail- return receipt requested, regular mail, and via 

### facsimile a true copy ofthe Complaint, addressed as follows: Arthur Wassennan, Esq. T

,aw Offices ofArthur Wasserman 16380 Roscoe Blvd., Ste. 120 Van Nuys, CA 91406-1221 Fax: 

### (818) 895-0675


### DEC 30 Z009 Dated:

# ;;;;~~ JeffKamherg, Legal Technician 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation**AdmiJ1i~tration** Western-Pacific Region 

### Lavvndalc, California