alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§7386 to 7386k. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 7386 to 7386k, Pub. L. 107–314, div. C, title XXXVI, §§3620–3631, Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2756–2762, were renumbered sections 4701 to 4712, respectively, of Pub. L. 107–314, the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(j)(2)(A)–(C), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1781, and are classified to sections 2741 to 2752, respectively, of Title 50, War and National Defense.

Section 7386 related to definitions for purposes of former sections 7386 to 7386k of this title.

Section 7386a related to reprogramming of amounts appropriated pursuant to a Department of Energy national security authorization.

Section 7386b related to minor construction projects.

Section 7386c related to limits on construction projects.

Section 7386d related to fund transfer authority.

Section 7386e related to conceptual and construction design.

Section 7386f related to authority for emergency planning, design, and construction activities.

Section 7386g related to scope of authority to carry out plant projects.

Section 7386h related to availability of funds.

Section 7386i related to transfer of defense environmental management funds.

Section 7386j related to transfer of weapons activities funds.

Section 7386k related to funds available for all national security programs of the Department of Energy.
### §§905, 905a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 905, act July 5, 1952, ch. 575, title II, §201, 66 Stat. 369, as amended, which related to the working capital fund, was transferred to section 3513 of this title.

Section 905a, act Aug. 10, 1971, Pub. L. 92–80, title II, §200, 85 Stat. 297, which related to additional use of the working capital fund, was transferred to section 3513b of this title.
### §3515c. Offset against Federal payments to States for provision of services

For any program funded in this Act or subsequent Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Acts, the Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized, when providing services or conducting activities for a State with respect to such program for which the Secretary is entitled to reimbursement by the State, to obtain such reimbursement as an offset against Federal payments to which the State would otherwise be entitled under such program from funds appropriated for the same or any subsequent fiscal year. Such offsets shall be credited to the appropriation account which bore the expense of providing the service or conducting the activity, and shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 102–394, title II, §214, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1812.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2997 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2997

  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2005

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain drawback 
                                claims.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN DRAWBACK CLAIMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, the Bureau of 
Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate or reliquidate the 
drawback claims, as filed, that are described in subsection (c).
    (b) Payment of Amounts Due.--Any amounts due pursuant to the 
liquidation or reliquidation of the claims described in subsection (c) 
shall be paid not later than 90 days after the date of such liquidation 
or reliquidation.
    (c) Drawback Claims.--The drawback claims referred to in subsection 
(a) are the following:

 
                   Drawback claim number                     Filing date
 
AA6-0303556-6                                                  12/02/97
AA6-0313128-2                                                  10/10/02
 

                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of RoomLinX, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Wasik, Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and results
      of
      operations of the Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
      September 21, 2006








/s/
                Michael S. WasikMichael
                WasikPresident,
                Chief Executive Officerand
                Chief Financial OfficerRoomLinX,
                Inc





This
      certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Emergent   Group  Inc.  (the
"registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),  I,
Bruce J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


August 14, 2006


/s/ Bruce J. Haber
-----------------------
Bruce J. Haber
Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 711.141-711.148 [Reserved]
DAVID WAYNE KIZZIRE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2746

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Levy County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appell ant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
### §§7361 to 7364. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–486, title XVI, §1606, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3003

Section 7361, Pub. L. 96–294, title III, §301, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 712, related to preparation of energy targets.

Section 7362, Pub. L. 96–294, title III, §302, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 712, related to congressional consideration.

Section 7363, Pub. L. 96–294, title III, §303, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 714, set out energy target form and definitions.

Section 7364, Pub. L. 96–294, title III, §304, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 715, set out general provisions regarding targets.
Case 3:09-cv-00422-MMC Document 36 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
January 8, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00422-MMC Document 36 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYNE GORDON,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GREGORY J. AHERN, SHERIFF, et.

al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-09-1849 TEH (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING OPPOSITION TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Wayne Gordon, currently incarcerated at the

Santa Rita Jail (Alameda County) in Dublin, California, filed a pro

se civil rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging jail

officials interfered with his access to the courts. Doc. #1. 

Following an Order of Service, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary

Judgment on December 4, 2009. Doc. ## 6 & 15. To date, Plaintiff

has failed to file an Opposition to Defendants’ motion. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-01849-TEH Document 36 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiff is advised he must file an Opposition to

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment by no later than May 3,

2010. Defendants’ Reply is due fifteen (15) days thereafter. 

Plaintiff is further advised that should he fail to file

an Opposition by May 3, 2010, or to show good cause why he cannot,

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 04/05/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.09\Gordon-09-1849-order requesting opp to msj.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01849-TEH Document 36 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2
### §§8721 to 8725. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 8721 to 8725 were omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.

Section 8721, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §125, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 644, established a national synthetic fuel production goal.

Section 8722, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §126, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 644, related to production strategy.

Section 8723, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §127, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 649, related to solicitation of proposals.

Section 8724, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §128, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 650, related to Congressional disapproval procedure.

Section 8725, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §129, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 652, related to Congressional approval procedure.
ex10-3.htm




EXHIBIT 10.3








 


Compensatory Arrangement for Hugh Blackwood







On September 9, 2010, URS Corporation’s Compensation Committee authorized an annual base salary for Hugh Blackwood of £300,000 effective as of the first pay period after September 10, 2010 and authorized a target bonus of 70% of his base salary under URS Corporation’s Annual Bonus Plan, effective as of the 2011 fiscal year.  In addition, Mr. Blackwood has an arrangement to use an apartment that is paid for by the Company.







 



i
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Additional Convertible Note-Goldman, Sachs & Co



  
 Exhibit 10.92

 Goldman, Sachs & Co. 
 200 West Street 
 New York, New York 10282-2198 

Telephone No.:    (212) 902-1000 
 August 30, 2010 
 To: Gilead Sciences, Inc.  

333 Lakeside Drive 
 Foster City, California
94404 

			
	 Attention:
	  	 Treasurer

	 Telephone No.:
	  	 (650) 522-5727

	 Facsimile No.:
	  	 (650) 522-3000


 Re: Additional
Call Option Transaction (2016) 
 Reference is made to the letter agreement Re: Additional Call Option
Transaction (2016) dated August 5, 2010 and entered into between into between Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Dealer”) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Counterparty”) (the “Confirmation”).
Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Confirmation. 
 Whereas the Confirmation defined the Free Convertibility Date as April 1, 2016, but Counterparty and Dealer wish to define the Free Convertibility Date as February 1, 2016; 

Now therefore, Counterparty and Dealer do hereby agree that the definition of the Free Convertibility Date in the
Confirmation is hereby replaced in its entirety by February 1, 2016. 
 [Signature Page to Follow] 







  
 
			
	 Yours faithfully,

	
	Goldman, Sachs & Co.
		
	 By:
	 	     /s/ Jonathan Lipnick

	 Name:
	 	 Jonathan Lipnick

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



 Accepted and
confirmed: 
 Gilead Sciences, Inc. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	     /s/ Brett A. Pletcher

	 Name:
	 	 Brett A. Pletcher

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President and General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Julius J. Adams, Relator, v. John F. McNeill, as Superintendent of Matteawan State Hospital, *653Respondent.

Application by petition, sworn to December 1, 1960, for a writ of habeas corpus, denied on the ground that the petition fails to comply with section 1234 of the Civil Practice Act. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
### §2427. Water rights

#### (a) In general

Nothing in this subchapter preempts or affects State water law or an interstate compact governing water.

#### (b) Compliance required

The Secretary shall comply with State water laws in carrying out this subchapter. Nothing in this subchapter affects or preempts State water law or an interstate compact governing water.

(Pub. L. 109–451, title II, §208, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3360.)
#### Darrell S. Lewis et al., Respondents, v U.A. Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[717 NYS2d 893]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant U.A. Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, Inc., d/b/a T.C.I. Cable of Westchester, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered January 29, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ cross motion which was for leave to file a supplemental bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6) and substituting therefor a *358provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1). There are issues of fact regarding whether the ladder supplied to the injured plaintiff provided “proper protection” within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1), and whether the placement of the ladder was a proximate cause of the accident *(see, Avendano v Sazerac, Inc.,*248 AD2d 340; *Basmas v J.B.J. Energy Corp.,*232 AD2d 594; *Romano v Hotel Carlyle Owners Corp.,*226 AD2d 441, 442).

In support of their cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6), the plaintiffs failed to properly plead a violation of a section of the Industrial Code that would permit recovery under the facts of this case. Thus, the Supreme Court should have granted summary judgment to the appellant dismissing the cause of action under Labor Law § 241 (6) *(see, Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp.,*82 NY2d 876; *McCole v City of New York,*221 AD2d 605, 606).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Frank J. Giaquinto, *v.*Michael Murphy, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York.

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten or 19i mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court. Concur-—-Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Time Warner Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                344
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       3,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                          935
<INVENTORY>                                         2,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    4,429
<PP&E>                                              3,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                      1,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     31,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               4,014
<BONDS>                                             9,915
<COMMON>                                                6
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               1,859
<PREFERRED>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                          9,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       31,850
<SALES>                                             6,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    6,809
<CGS>                                               3,964
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       3,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       223
<INCOME-TAX>                                          184
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    39
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                           39
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.21)
        



</TABLE>
§ 248.183 Preemption of State and local laws. ( a ) *In general.* No State or political subdivision of a State may establish, continue in effect, or enforce any law or regulation that: ( 1 ) Restricts or inhibits the prepayment of any mortgage described in § 248.101 or the voluntary termination of any insurance contract pursuant to § 207.253 of this chapter on eligible low income housing projects;
( 2 ) Restricts or inhibits an owner of such projects from receiving the authorized annual return provided under § 248.121;
( 3 ) Is inconsistent with any provision of subpart B of this part, including any law, regulation, or other restriction that limits or impairs the ability of any owner of eligible low income housing to receive incentives authorized under subpart B of this part, including authorization to increase rental rates, transfer the project, obtain secondary financing, or use the proceeds of any such incentives; or
( 4 ) In its applicability to low income housing is limited only to eligible low income housing for which the owner has prepaid the mortgage or terminated the insurance contract.
( b ) *Effect.* Any law, regulation or restriction described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be ineffective and any eligible low income housing exempt from the law, regulation, or restriction, only to the extent that it violates the provisions of this section.
( c ) *Laws of general applicability: contractual restrictions.* This section shall not prevent the establishment, continuing in effect, or enforcement of any law or regulation of any State or political subdivision of a State not inconsistent with the provision of this subpart, such as any law or regulation relating to building standards, zoning limitations, health, safety, or habitability standards for housing, rent control, or conversion of rental housing to condominium or cooperative ownership, to the extent such law or regulation is of general applicability to both projects receiving Federal assistance and nonassisted projects. This section shall not preempt, annul or alter any contractual restrictions or obligations existing before November 28, 1990 or voluntarily entered into by an owner of eligible low income housing on or after that date, and that limit or prevent that owner from prepaying the mortgage on the project or terminating the mortgage insurance contract.
[57 FR 12041, Apr. 8, 1992, as amended at 57 FR 57314, Dec. 3, 1992]
### §7671f. Exchange authority

#### (a) Transfers

The Administrator shall, within 10 months after November 15, 1990, promulgate rules under this subchapter providing for the issuance of allowances for the production of class I and II substances in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter and governing the transfer of such allowances. Such rules shall insure that the transactions under the authority of this section will result in greater total reductions in the production in each year of class I and class II substances than would occur in that year in the absence of such transactions.

#### (b) Interpollutant transfers

(1) The rules under this section shall permit a production allowance for a substance for any year to be transferred for a production allowance for another substance for the same year on an ozone depletion weighted basis.

(2) Allowances for substances in each group of class I substances (as listed pursuant to section 7671a of this title) may only be transferred for allowances for other substances in the same Group.

(3) The Administrator shall, as appropriate, establish groups of class II substances for trading purposes and assign class II substances to such groups. In the case of class II substances, allowances may only be transferred for allowances for other class II substances that are in the same Group.

#### (c) Trades with other persons

The rules under this section shall permit 2 or more persons to transfer production allowances (including interpollutant transfers which meet the requirements of subsections (a) and (b)) if the transferor of such allowances will be subject, under such rules, to an enforceable and quantifiable reduction in annual production which—

(1) exceeds the reduction otherwise applicable to the transferor under this subchapter,

(2) exceeds the production allowances transferred to the transferee, and

(3) would not have occurred in the absence of such transaction.

#### (d) Consumption

The rules under this section shall also provide for the issuance of consumption allowances in accordance with the requirements of this subchapter and for the trading of such allowances in the same manner as is applicable under this section to the trading of production allowances under this section.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title VI, §607, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title VI, §602(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2660.)