alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Irving L. Gale, Respondent, v. Janco Taxi, Inc., et al., Defendants, and John Holonitch, Appellant.

On the call of the calendar, appeal dismissed. There was no appearance for appellant, and appellant failed to comply with an order of this court, dated April 12, 1962, requiring him to perfect the appeal on May 4, 1962. The stay heretofore granted is vacated. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §1769. Existing right-of-way or right-of-use unaffected; exceptions; rights-of-way for railroad and appurtenant communication facilities; applicability of existing terms and conditions

(a) Nothing in this subchapter shall have the effect of terminating any right-of-way or right-of-use heretofore issued, granted, or permitted. However, with the consent of the holder thereof, the Secretary concerned may cancel such a right-of-way or right-of-use and in its stead issue a right-of-way pursuant to the provisions of this subchapter.

(b) When the Secretary concerned issues a right-of-way under this subchapter for a railroad and appurtenant communication facilities in connection with a realinement of a railroad on lands under his jurisdiction by virtue of a right-of-way granted by the United States, he may, when he considers it to be in the public interest and the lands involved are not within an incorporated community and are of approximately equal value, notwithstanding the provisions of this subchapter, provide in the new right-of-way the same terms and conditions as applied to the portion of the existing right-of-way relinquished to the United States with respect to the payment of annual rental, duration of the right-of-way, and the nature of the interest in lands granted. The Secretary concerned or his delegate shall take final action upon all applications for the grant, issue, or renewal of rights-of-way under subsection (b) of this section no later than six months after receipt from the applicant of all information required from the applicant by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title V, §509, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2781.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 1763 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2963 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2963

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve compensation benefits 
 for veterans in certain cases of impairment of vision involving both 
                                 eyes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2005

   Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Miller of Florida, Ms. 
 Berkley, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Evans, Mr. Murtha, Mr. Shimkus, 
 Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. 
  Spratt, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Price of North 
     Carolina, Mr. Weldon of Florida, and Mr. Gene Green of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve compensation benefits 
 for veterans in certain cases of impairment of vision involving both 
                                 eyes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Dr. James Allen Disabled Veterans 
Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR VETERANS IN CERTAIN CASES OF 
              IMPAIRMENT OF VISION INVOLVING BOTH EYES.

    Section 1160(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``blindness'' the first place it appears 
        and inserting ``impairment of vision compensable to a degree of 
        10 percent or more''; and
            (2) by striking ``and blindness'' and inserting ``and 
        impairment of vision''.
                                 <all>
```
### §§8711 to 8719. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 8711 to 8719 were omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.

Section 8711, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §115, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 636, created the Corporation, provided for its offices and residence status, and referred to its general powers.

Section 8712, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §116, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 636, provided for board of directors of Corporation.

Section 8713, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §117, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 638; Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title II, §201], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1837, 1860, related to officers and employees of Corporation.

Section 8714, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §118, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 638, related to conflicts of interest and financial disclosure.

Section 8715, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §119, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 639, related to delegation of authority and transfer of functions.

Section 8716, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §120, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 640, authorized administrative expenses.

Section 8717, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §121, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 641, related to public access to information.

Section 8718, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §122, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 641, related to Inspector General of Corporation.

Section 8719, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §123, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 644, established an Advisory Committee to the Board of Directors. For continuation of Advisory Committee, see section 7404(c) of Pub. L. 99–272, set out as a note under section 8791 of this title.
§ 1508.610 What procedures does the African Development Foundation use in suspension and debarment actions? In deciding whether to suspend or debar you, we handle the actions as informally as practicable, consistent with principles of fundamental fairness. ( a ) For suspension actions, we use the procedures in this subpart and subpart G of this part.
( b ) For debarment actions, we use the procedures in this subpart and subpart H of this part.
u 

455 Mountain Village Blvd . Ste . A 

Mountain Village, CO 81435 

www.townofrnounta invill age .com 

970 728.8000 


970 728 .434 2 


July 28, 20 II 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

I would like to submit this letter of support for a Small Community Air Service Grant on behalf 

of the Telluride Regional Airport ("TRA") and Telluride Montrose Regional Air Organization 

("TMRAO"). Both of these organizations serve a vital function in our regional sustainability and 

they need grant opportunities such as these to fulfill their mission in our small community. 

If successful, this grant will serve to provide a second airline and destination into TRA by adding 

service from Phoenix to Telluride. Not only would a second airline and destination allow us to 

apply pressure for lower fares but would help us to reach our goal of more than 10,000 

enplanements on an annual basis. We are not currently matching the demand with existing 

services during the summer and this would go a long way towards solving this problem. 

Additionally, Phoenix is one of our top markets for summer air service and providing more flight 

and schedule choices will allow our visitors additional convenience and attract more people to 

our area. This will assist in invigorating our economy, attracting more diverse businesses while 

at the same time creating new and more attractive job opportunities. Finally, this added service 

will entice our visitors to stay longer in the area, spend more money which in turn will further 

bolster the regional economy. 

Thank you for the opportunity and as the Mayor of the Town of Mountain Village I strongly 

support this request for grant funding and urge you to give this request your diligent 

consideration. 

Mayor
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76603-76604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consortium for Execution of Rendezvous and 
Servicing Operations

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 18, 2020, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consortium for Execution of 
Rendezvous and Servicing Operations (``CONFERS'') filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Cateni, El 
Segundo, CA, Maxar Technologies, Westminister, CO, Oceaneering Space 
Systems, Houston, TX and Starfish Space Inc., Kent, WA have been added 
as parties to this venture.
    No organization has withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CONFERS intends to file additional 
written

[[Page 76604]]

notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 10, 2018, CONFERS filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 19, 2018 (83 FR 53106).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 1, 2020. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on May 28, 2020 (85 FR 32049).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-26358 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
### SUBCHAPTER II—LAND USE PLANNING AND LAND ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION
#### In the Matter of Robert De Santis, Respondent, v Angela Pedone et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Oneida County, Respondents, and Joseph Pasqualetti, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in *Matter of De Santis v Pedone*(61 AD2d 1136). (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court— special appearance, jurisdiction, etc.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
### §3797w–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797w–1 was editorially reclassified as section 10632 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Mary C. Tilden, defendant in error, v. B. E. Tilden, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 28,343.

Bill for separate maintenance and custody of child. Decree (or complainant. Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. G. Fred Rush, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed June 26, 1923.

Winters, Price & Stevens, for plaintiff in error. Victor B. Scott, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 234.65 Nature of title.

A mortgage, to be eligible for insurance, shall be on a fee interest in, or on a leasehold interest in, a one-family unit in a project including an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, and such restricted common areas and facilities as may be designated. To be eligible, a leasehold interest shall be under a lease for not less than 99 years which is renewable, or under a lease having a period of not less than 10 years to run beyond the maturity date of the mortgage.
§ 26.31 Time computations. ( a ) *General.* In computing any period of time under subpart B of this part, the time period begins the day following the act, event, or default, and includes the last day of the period, unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed by the Federal Government, in which case the time period includes the next business day. When the prescribed time period is 7 days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded from the computation.
( b ) *Entry of orders.* In computing any time period involving the date of the issuance of an order or decision by an Administrative Law Judge, the date of issuance is the date the order or decision is served by the Docket Clerk.
( c ) *Service by mail.* If a document is served by mail, 3 days shall be added to the time permitted for a response.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

___________ 1

Stipulation and Order to Shorten Time, Case No. CV-08-4571 MMC 

MORIS DAVIDOVITZ, ESQ. (State Bar #70581)

CHARLES BOLCOM, ESQ. (State Bar #193762)

DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP

One Embarcadero Center, Suite 750

San Francisco, California 94111

Telephone: (415) 956-4800

Facsimile: (415) 788-5948

Attorneys for Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff 

CITY OF EUREKA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California

Corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF EUREKA,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

CITY OF EUREKA,

 Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California

Corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner, et al.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV-08-4571 MMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON

EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR

NAMING KENNETH DAER AS AN

INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT

[Civil L.R. 7-12]

DATE: March 12, 2010

TIME: 9:00 a.m.

DEPT: Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

 Courtroom 7, 19th Floor

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, defendant and third-party plaintiff City of Eureka and

plaintiff KFD Enteprises, Inc. stipulate and request judicial action as follows: 

1. The City’s motion to extend the deadline of March 12, 2010 to name Kenneth

Daer as an individual, third-party defendant will now be heard on shortened notice; the existing

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 194 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

___________ 2

Stipulation and Order to Shorten Time, Case No. CV-08-4571 MMC 

hearing date of April 2, 2010 will be changed to March 12, 2010 at 9 a.m.

2. KFD will file its opposition by March 9, 2010 at 5 p.m. 

3. The City waives its right to a written reply but reserves its right to raise reply

arguments during the oral hearing on March 12, 2010.

Date: February 23, 2010 DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP

____/s/____________________________

MORIS DAVIDOVITZ

CHARLES H. BOLCOM 

Attorneys for Defendant and

 Third-Party Plaintiff CITY OF EUREKA

(The filer attests that counsel for KFD Enterprises

Inc., Jan Greben, has been advised of these terms

and agrees to them)

Date: February 23, 2010 GREBEN & ASSOCIATES

____/s/_____________________________

JAN GREBEN

Attorney for Plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: February _______, 2010 ___________________________

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 194 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 2
SAMHSA FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDERS CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE

American Indian/

Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian

Resource Kit
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This resource kit was prepared for the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration (SAMHSA) by Northrop Grumman Health Solutions under contract

number 277-01-6068 with SAMHSA, U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services (DHHS). Ammie A. Bonsu, MPH, served as the Government Project Officer.

Numerous people contributed to the development of this document, including

Jennifer Aggelis, Susan James Andrews, Gayl Anglin, Renee Baughman, Stacy

Bohlen, Doreen Bonnett, Kabi Buffington, Lorena Burris, Rose Clark, Monique

Mercer Coleman, Michael Dickey, Dan Dubovsky, Gail Dym, Barbara Eberhard,

Judge H. Chico Gallegos, Callie Gass, Gloria Grim, Michael Guilfoyle, Carolyn

Hartness, Elizabeth Hayes, Judy Stanger Houck, Catherine Ignacio, Laura Jacobs,

Florence Janis, Suzanne Kuerschner, Mark La Beau, Steve Luckabaugh, Violet

Mitchell-Enos, Kim Nesbitt, J.T. Petherick, Theresa Raphael, Jeffrey Roussel, Doreen

Major Ryan, Andrea Savoye, Louise Shabi-Ashkie, Candace Shelton, Jana Silver,

Laura Simon, Ardyce Turner, Margaret Yellow Kidney, and Benjamin Young.

DISCLAIMER

The views, opinions, and content of the items in this resource kit are those of the

authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or policies of the SAMHSA

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Center for Excellence, SAMHSA, or DHHS.

PUBLIC DOMAIN NOTICE

All material appearing in this resource kit is in the public domain and may be

reproduced or copied without permission from SAMHSA. Citation of the source is

appreciated. However, this resource kit may not be reproduced or distributed for a

fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications,

SAMHSA, DHHS.

ELECTRONIC ACCESS AND COPIES OF PUBLICATION

The contents of this resource kit may be accessed electronically through the

following Internet World Wide Web connection: www.samhsa.gov. For additional

free copies of this resource kit, please call SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for

Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI) at 1-800-729-6686 or 1-800-487-4889 (TDD).

RECOMMENDED CITATION

SAMHSA Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders Center for Excellence, American

Indian/Alaska Native/Native Hawaiian Resource Kit. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 07-4264.

Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and

Mental Health Services Administration, 2007.

ORIGINATING OFFICE

Division of Community Programs, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention,

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1 Choke Cherry Road,

Rockville, MD 20850

DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 07-4264

Printed 2007
###### Editorial Note on Part 217

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### §§ 217.48-217.60 [Reserved]
### **CHAPTER 33A—IMPLEMENTATION OF ALASKA NATIVE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AND ALASKA STATEHOOD**

Sec.
1631.
Ownership of submerged lands.
1632.
Statute of limitations on decisions of Secretary and reconveyance of land by Village Corporation.
1633.
Administrative provisions.
1634.
Alaska Native allotments.
1635.
State selections and conveyances.
1636.
Alaska land bank.
1637.
Use of protraction diagrams.
1638.
National Environmental Policy Act.
1639.
Construction with Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
1640.
Relinquishment of selections partly within conservation units.
1641.
Conveyances to Village Corporations.
1642.
Land conveyances.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6181

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL EUGENE JONES, a/k/a Big Mike, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (3:00-cr-00027-FPS; 3:04-cv-19) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Eugene Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Eugene Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reason able jurists would find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 73 
          - [DA 04-73; MB Docket No. 02-164, RM-10476] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; dismissal. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Sierra Grande Broadcasting filed a petition for rule making proposing the allotment of Channel 236C2 at Cimarron, New Mexico, as the community's first local aural transmission service.                         *See*67 FR 47502, July 19, 2002. Petitioner subsequently filed an amendment requesting the allotment of Channel 296C1 in lieu of Channel 236C2 at Cimarron, New Mexico. The new proposal to allot Channel 296C1 at Cimarron conflicts with a pending petition to allot Channel 296A at Las Vegas, New Mexico, and will be considered in the context of that proceeding. A showing of continuing interest is required before a channel will be allotted. It is the Commission's policy to refrain from making an allotment to a community absent an expression of interest. Therefore, we will dismiss petitioner's petition in the instant proceeding.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sharon P. McDonald, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Report and Order, MB Docket No. 02-164, adopted January 14, 2004, and released January 20, 2004 . The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

John A. Karousos, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 04-2834 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P