alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-15;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005
By:      /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
### §1544. Annual report to Congress

On January 1 of each year the Secretary shall report to the Congress, beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 1969, upon the status of the revenues from and the cost of constructing, operating, and maintaining each lower basin unit of the project for the preceding fiscal year. The report of the Secretary shall be prepared to reflect accurately the Federal investment allocated at that time to power, to irrigation, and to other purposes, the progress of return and repayment thereon, and the estimated rate of progress, year by year, in accomplishing full repayment.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title IV, §404, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 896.)
#### §§ 144.171-144.999 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer and Edouard A. Garneau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated..








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: May 16, 2011





By:      /s/ Michael S. Wasik


Michael S. Wasik


Chief Executive Officer





By:      /s/ Edouard A. Garneau


Edouard A. Garneau


Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Michael Stojda, President and Chief Executive Officer of Splinex Technology Inc. certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex Technology Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;
 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
 b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   June 29, 2005 BY: /S/ Michael Stojda     Michael Stojda  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer and  Duly Authorized Officer)
#### Edward J. Bilanski, Respondent, v. Alfonso Candela, Appellant.

In a negligence action against the driver of an automobile, who fell asleep while driving, to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical expenses sustained by the plaintiff, the owner of the automobile, who was a passenger and asleep some time before and up to the time of the accident, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered June 8, 1961 upon the jury’s verdict after trial, in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 107.11 Relation to other authorities. ( a ) Where allegations of discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin are made in a program or activity of Federal financial assistance of the Department which does not involve a contract of insurance or guaranty, the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and regulations implementing title VI, Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs, under part 1 of this title shall apply. Any complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion (creed), sex or national origin in a program or activity of the Department involving a contract of insurance or guaranty will be received and processed according to this part.
( b ) Where a complaint filed pursuant to this part alleges a discriminatory housing practice which is also covered by title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, the complainant shall be advised of the right to file a complaint pursuant to section 810 of that title and of the availability of Department procedures regarding fair housing complaints under part 105 of this title. The complainant shall also be advised of the right to initiate a civil action in court pursuant to section 812 of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 without first filing a complaint with HUD.
[45 FR 59514, Sept. 9, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 31360, Aug. 2, 1985]
### §3057. Statement of purpose

It is the purpose of this subchapter to promote the delivery of supportive services, including nutrition services to American Indians, Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiians that are comparable to services provided under subchapter III.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title VI, §601, as added Pub. L. 100–175, title I, §171, Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 959.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3057, Pub. L. 89–73, title VI, §601, as added Pub. L. 95–478, title I, §106, Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1548; amended Pub. L. 97–115, §3(d), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1597, related to statement of purpose for grants to Indian tribes, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 100–175.

A prior section 601 of Pub. L. 89–73, title VI, as added Pub. L. 91–69, §9, Sept. 17, 1969, 83 Stat. 111; amended Pub. L. 93–29, title VI, §601, May 3, 1973, 87 Stat. 55, related to grants and contracts for volunteer service projects and was classified to section 3044 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 93–113, title VI, §604(a), Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 417.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1987, except not applicable with respect to any area plan submitted under section 3026(a) of this title or any State plan submitted under section 3027(a) of this title and approved for any fiscal year beginning before Nov. 29, 1987, see section 701(a), (b) of Pub. L. 100–175, set out as an Effective Date of 1987 Amendment note under section 3001 of this title.
#### Seaboard Air-Line Railway *v.*Gnann *&*DeLoach.

August 16, 1912.

Evans, P. J.

The testimony to which objection was made, when connected with other testimony as required by the court in his ruling on its admissibility, tended to support the case as laid in the petition, and was not irrelevant. The requests to charge, in so far as they contained accurate statements of the law, were covered by the general charge, which in the main applied the rules of law respecting the liability of a railroad company for damage to property, proximately caused by a lire negligently set out by the running of "its trains, as is clearly and fully defined in *Southern Railway Company*v. *Thompson,*129 *Ga.*367 (58 S. E. 1044). The judgment is reversed on the exception to the charge, that “The measure of diligence which the law places upon the railroad company is ordinary care and diligence in respect to carrying and keeping in repair spark-arresters to prevent fire, and the same ordinary care and diligence in keeping the same in good order.” The failure to have or maintain in good order spark-arresters was not charged in the petition as an act of negligence, and the court erred in charging upon the subject. The charge was harmful, inasmuch as the jury might have found that the sparks would not have been emitted if the engine had been equipped with a spark-arrester, and that ordinary care would require such equipment.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*537Action for damages. Before Judge Sheppard. Effingham superior court. June 15, 1911.

*Anderson, Gann & Gann*and *Thomas F. Walsh Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hitch & Denmark*and *William M. Farr,*contra.
§ 96.8 Fees charged by accrediting entities. ( a ) An accrediting entity may charge fees for accreditation or approval services under this part only in accordance with a schedule of fees approved by the Secretary. Before approving a schedule of fees proposed by an accrediting entity, or subsequent proposed changes to an approved schedule, the Secretary will require the accrediting entity to demonstrate: ( 1 ) That its proposed schedule of fees reflects appropriate consideration of the relative size and geographic location and volume of intercountry adopton cases of the agencies or persons it expects to serve;
( 2 ) That the total fees the accrediting entity expects to collect under the schedule of fees will not exceed the full costs of accreditation or approval under this part (including, but not limited to, costs for completing the accreditation or approval process, complaint review and investigation, routine oversight and enforcement, and other data collection and reporting activities).
( b ) The schedule of fees must: ( 1 ) Establish separate non-refundable fees for accreditation and approval;
( 2 ) Include in each fee for accreditation or approval the costs of all activities associated with the accreditation or approval cycle, including but not limited to, costs for completing the accreditation or approval process, complaint review and investigation, routine oversight and enforcement, and other data collection and reporting activities, except that separate fees based on actual costs incurred may be charged for the travel and maintenance of evaluators.
( c ) An accrediting entity must make its approved schedule of fees available to the public, including prospective applicants for accreditation or approval, upon request. At the time of application, the accrediting entity must specify the fees to be charged to the applicant in a contract between the parties and must provide notice to the applicant that no portion of the fee will be refunded if the applicant fails to become accredited or approved.
( d ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide a private right of action to challenge any fee charged by an accrediting entity pursuant to a schedule of fees approved by the Secretary.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40633, July 14, 2014]
### §6028. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–230, title II, §210, Apr. 6, 1994, 108 Stat. 313

Section, Pub. L. 88–164, title I, §128, as added Pub. L. 98–527, §2, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2678, related to nonduplication in determining amount of Federal share of expenditures under State plan approved under section 6022 of this title.
#### In re MINK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 1, 1905.)

In the matter of the application of Edwin R. Mink for the discovery of personal property. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, upon stipulation, without costs to either party.
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment dated September 1, 2010 (the "Amendment") to the Employment Agreement originally dated September 15, 2003 (the "Agreement"), by and between Trey Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with offices at 5 Regent Street, Suite 520, Livingston, NJ  07039 (the "Company") and Mark Meller, an individual residing at ******************** (the "Executive").







WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive mutually wish to amend the Agreement;







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:







The terms and conditions as set forth below shall amend the Employment Agreement







1. TERM. The term of the Executive's employment hereunder shall be extended to September 15, 2017.







2. COMPENSATION.  Executive may receive compensation from SWK Technologies, Inc. (“SWK”) in his role as Chairman of that Company.  SWK is an 80% owned subsidiary of the Company.  In the event that Executive does in fact receive cash compensation from SWK, Executive’s cash compensation from the Company shall be reduced, dollar for dollar, by the cash compensation paid him by SWK.







All of other terms of this Agreement shall remain if full force and effect and shall remain unchanged.

















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date written below:







TREY RESOURCES, INC.

















By:___________________________ Dated:______________________


           Mark Meller












Title: Chief Executive Officer and President







MARK MELLER

















By:___________________________ Dated:______________________
§ 242.4 Eligible hospitals. ( a ) The hospital to be financed with a mortgage insured under this part shall involve the construction of a new hospital, the substantial rehabilitation (or replacement) of an existing hospital, the limited rehabilitation of an existing hospital, the acquisition of an existing hospital, or the refinancing of the capital debt of an existing hospital pursuant to Section 223(a)(7) or Section 223(f).
( b ) This part applies only to applications for FHA mortgage insurance submitted after a pre-application meeting (as defined in § 242.1) with HUD that occurred on and after January 28, 2008. HUD's regulations and practices prior to January 28, 2008 apply to applications for FHA mortgage insurance submitted after a pre-application meeting that occurred before January 28, 2008.
[72 FR 67546, Nov. 28, 2007, as amended at 78 FR 8341, Feb. 5, 2013]
§ 267.22 Periodic review of the QRM definition, exempted three-to-four unit residential mortgage loans, and community-focused residential mortgage exemption. ( a ) The Federal banking agencies and the Commission, in consultation with the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, shall commence a review of the definition of qualified residential mortgage in § 267.13, a review of the community-focused residential mortgage exemption in § 267.19(f), and a review of the exemption for qualifying three-to-four unit residential mortgage loans in § 267.19(g): ( 1 ) No later than four years after the effective date of the rule (as it relates to securitizers and originators of asset-backed securities collateralized by residential mortgages), five years following the completion of such initial review, and every five years thereafter; and
( 2 ) At any time, upon the request of any Federal banking agency, the Commission, the Federal Housing Finance Agency or the Department of Housing and Urban Development, specifying the reason for such request, including as a result of any amendment to the definition of qualified mortgage or changes in the residential housing market.
( b ) The Federal banking agencies, the Commission, the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall publish in the Federal Register notice of the commencement of a review and, in the case of a review commenced under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the reason an agency is requesting such review. After completion of any review, but no later than six months after the publication of the notice announcing the review, unless extended by the agencies, the agencies shall jointly publish a notice disclosing the determination of their review. If the agencies determine to amend the definition of qualified residential mortgage, the agencies shall complete any required rulemaking within 12 months of publication in the Federal Register of such notice disclosing the determination of their review, unless extended by the agencies.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster <greek-i>3627)


State of Florida (Amendment <greek-i> 5)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency--effective 
December 9, 2004, the above numbered declaration is hereby amended to 
include Brevard, Citrus, Clay, Duval, Flagler, Highlands, Indian River, 
Lake, Lee, Manatee, Marion, Martin, Okeechobee, Osceola, Orange, Palm 
Beach, Pasco, Polk, Seminole, St. Johns, St. Lucie, and Volusia as 
disaster areas due to damages caused by Hurricane Ivan occurring on 
September 13, 2004, and continuing through November 17, 2004.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Alachua, Baker, 
Bradford, Broward, Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, 
Hernando, Hillsborough, Levy, Nassau, Pinellas, Putnam, Sarasota, and 
Sumter may be filed until the specified date at the previously 
designated location. All other counties contiguous to the above named 
primary counties have previously been declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is January 3, 2005 and for 
economic injury the deadline is June 16, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008).

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-27763 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §1629f. Claims arising from contamination of transferred lands

(a) As used in this section the term "contaminant" means 1 hazardous substance harmful to public health or the environment, including friable asbestos.

(b) Within 18 months of November 2, 1995, and after consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, State of Alaska, and appropriate Alaska Native Corporations and organizations, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, a report addressing issues presented by the presence of contaminants on lands conveyed or prioritized for conveyance to such corporations pursuant to this chapter. Such report shall consist of—

(1) existing information concerning the nature and types of contaminants present on such lands prior to conveyance to Alaska Native Corporations;

(2) existing information identifying to the extent practicable the existence and availability of potentially responsible parties for the removal or remediation of the effects of such contaminants;

(3) identification of existing remedies;

(4) recommendations for any additional legislation that the Secretary concludes is necessary to remedy the problem of contaminants on the lands; and

(5) in addition to the identification of contaminants, identification of structures known to have asbestos present and recommendations to inform Native landowners on the containment of asbestos.

(Pub. L. 92–203, §40, as added Pub. L. 104–42, title I, §103, Nov. 2, 1995, 109 Stat. 354.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Resources of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007.

1 So in original. Probably should be "means a".
Case 3:09-cv-01056-SC Document 35 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 3
Dec. 21, 2010 10:00 a.m.

Case 3:09-cv-01056-SC Document 35 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 3
Jan 10, 201 8:30

Case 3:09-cv-01056-SC Document 35 Filed 03/25/10 Page 3 of 3