alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6/23/2015 VW Using CO2 in Air Conditioning Systems · Environmental Leader · Environmental Management & Sustainable Development News

http://www.environmentalleader.com/2015/03/23/vw­using­co2­in­air­conditioning­systems/ 1/2

Environmental Leader

Search

Home

» Green Fleets & Transportation » Automotive »

VW Using CO2 in Air Conditioning Systems

March 23, 2015

VW Using CO2 in Air Conditioning Systems

Volkswagen has ordered air conditioning systems that use CO2 as a coolant for its VW

Phaeton and the Audi A8, the Frankfurter Rundschau reports.

In March 2013, VW, Daimler, Audi, BMW and Porsche originally announced plans to

develop CO2 technology as a more climate­friendly refrigerant for air conditioning systems.

VW says CO2 as a refrigerant — also known as R744 — has lower greenhouse gas effects

than conventional refrigerants, with a GWP (Global Warming Potential) value of 1, or 99.3

percent below the European Union­specified GWP limit of 150. The German automaker

says the technology will be rolled out progressively over its entire vehicle fleet.

German media sources have reported four other carmakers — Daimler, Audi, BMW and

Porsche — will also switch to CO2 technology in mobile air conditioning systems as an

alternative to R­1234yf.

Stay on top of Environmental Management news & analysis ­ Subscribe to EL's Free Daily Newsletter

Email Address *

Subscriptions *

Environmental Leader Daily
6/23/2015 VW Using CO2 in Air Conditioning Systems · Environmental Leader · Environmental Management & Sustainable Development News

http://www.environmentalleader.com/2015/03/23/vw­using­co2­in­air­conditioning­systems/ 2/2

Sign Up

Stay connected to EL!

Energy Manager News

Recycling & Waste Reduction Report
The ALB is distinctive: 

	 Large–about 1.5 inches long	 Shiny black with white spots

	 Long antennae banded in black & white	 Feet with a slightly bluish-white tinge

Look for these signs:

Beetles leave a residue that looks like sawdust, called frass, at the base of trees and

in tree limbs.

	 ALBs leave round exit holes in tree trunks and branches.

ALB females deposit eggs in dime-sized pits that they chew into the bark of trees.

	 ALB larvae tunnel deep within trees.

Adult ALBs can be found anywhere during the spring and summer

months, not just on trees.

Please search and report. Whether or not any signs of an ALB are observed, please

report the results of the search on the Web by following the directions at <http://

beetlebusters.aphis.usda.gov>. You can also call the ALB Cooperative Eradication

	 Program and report a search at 847–298–4540 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,

	 Monday through Friday.

In Illinois, the Asian Longhorned Beetle Cooperative Eradication Program is comprised of the U.S.

Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Forest Service, along

with the City of Chicago and the Illinois Department of Agriculture.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Countdown to Eradication

The Asian Longhorned Beetle (ALB) will not be declared eradicated in Illinois until

the ALB Cooperative Eradication Program is convinced that the chemical tree treatments, ground and climbing surveys, bucket-truck surveys, and infested tree removals

have yielded the expected outcome:

Every last ALB in Chicago found—

and destroyed.

If there is a beetle out there, you can help

the ALB Program find it.

Z

For more information Log onto www.aphis.usda.gov and click on the Asian 

longhorned beetle under “Hot Issues,” page 2.

Z

Z

Z

ALB larva

Z

The ALB is active from spring to fall

and prefers hardwood trees, such as

all species of maple, birch, elm,

horsechestnut, poplar, willow, and ash.

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

ALB pupa with frass

Z

ALB near exit hole

Z

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Program Aid No. 1927, Issued July 2007
### §§1151 to 1156. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792

Section 1151, R.S. §2447; act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1144; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to issuance of patents for confirmed claims.

Section 1152, R.S. §2448, related to effect of patents to persons dead before issue.

Section 1153, act June 6, 1874, ch. 223, §1, 18 Stat. 62, related to confirming titles to lands in Missouri in existence prior to June 6, 1874.

Section 1154, act June 6, 1874, ch. 223, §2, 18 Stat. 62, related to unimpairing, etc., rights in existence prior to June 6, 1874.

Section 1155, act Jan. 28, 1879, ch. 30, §§1–4, 20 Stat. 274, 275; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, authorized issuance of certificates of location of private land claims for certain States.

Section 1156, act May 30, 1894, ch. 87, 28 Stat. 84; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, authorized issuance of patents for locations under certificates made prior to Jan. 28, 1879, under former section 1155 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §705(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792, provided that the repeal made by section 705(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNADETTE P. LEWIS,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

NEW UNITED MOTORS CORP.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C 09-00869 JCS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 16, 2010, a Status hearing re: Default was held. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff appear on May 21, 2010, at 1:30 p.m.,

before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero, in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California, and then and there to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 19, 2010 _________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00869-JCS Document 28 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification PursuanttoSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Michael G. Long, ChiefFinancial Officer of Edge Petroleum Corporation, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November 9, 2005 | /s/  Michael G. Long |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------|
|   |                  | Name:                | Michael G. Long |
|   |                  |                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
----

Exhibit 12.2 - 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Daniel Denault, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F ofBombardier Recreational Products Inc; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omittedpursuant to Transition Period provisions at Section III of Release 34-47986 ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Management's Reports onInternal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure inExchange Act Periodic Reports"] for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

By: /s/ DANIEL DENAULT **Daniel Denault****Chief Financial Officer**

Date: April 27, 2006 

----
### §291j–1. Loan guarantees and loans

#### (a) Authority of Secretary

(1) In order to assist nonprofit private agencies to carry out needed projects for the modernization or construction of nonprofit private hospitals, facilities for long-term care, outpatient facilities, and rehabilitation facilities, the Secretary, during the period July 1, 1970, through June 30, 1974, may, in accordance with the provisions of this part, guarantee to non-Federal lenders making loans to such agencies for such projects, payment of principal of and interest on loans, made by such lenders, which are approved under this part.

(2) In order to assist public agencies to carry out needed projects for the modernization or construction of public health centers, and public hospitals, facilities for long-term care, outpatient facilities, and rehabilitation facilities, the Secretary, during the period July 1, 1970, through June 30, 1974, may, in accordance with the provisions of this part, make loans to such agencies which shall be sold and guaranteed in accordance with section 291j–7 of this title.

#### (b) Cost limitations

(1) No loan guarantee under this part with respect to any modernization or construction project may apply to so much of the principal amount thereof as, when added to the amount of any grant or loan under part A with respect to such project, exceeds 90 per centum of the cost of such project.

(2) No loan to a public agency under this part shall be made in an amount which, when added to the amount of any grant or loan under part A with respect to such project, exceeds 90 per centum of the cost of such project.

#### (c) Administrative assistance

The Secretary, with the consent of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, shall obtain from the Department of Housing and Urban Development such assistance with respect to the administration of this part as will promote efficiency and economy thereof.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VI, §621, as added Pub. L. 91–296, title II, §201, June 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 344; amended Pub. L. 93–45, title I, §108(b)(1), June 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 93.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–45 extended termination date of guarantee and loan making period in pars. (1) and (2) from June 30, 1973, to June 30, 1974.
Robert M. Pattison (State Bar No. 103428) 

Alison Cubre (State Bar No. 257834) 

JACKSON LEWIS LLP 

199 Fremont Street, 10th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94 105 

Telephone: (4 15) 394-9400 

Facsimile: (4 15) 3 94-940 1 

E-mail: pattisonr@~iacksonlewis.com 

E-mail: cubrea~iacksonlewis.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES, 

INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MIKELA MINACIS, 

Plaintiff, 

INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SERVICES 

INC . 

Defendant. 

Case No. CV-09-0 1653 MHP 

APPLICATION TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY AT 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Date: April 16,20 10 

Time: 1O:OO am 

Dept.: 301 

Judge: Hon. Maria Elena-James 

Complaint Filed: April 14,2009 

Trial Date: None Set 

A Settlement Conference is scheduled in this case for April 16, 2010, at 10:OO a.m. before 

Judge Maria-Elena James. Defendant International Security Services Inc. ("Defendant") submits 

this application to request that the representative from its insurance carrier be allowed to appear 

telephonically at that conference. 

Defendant is insured by Travelers' Indemnity Co. ("Travelers"). The claims examiner at 

Travelers who is responsible for this case is Shantel Dixon. Ms. Dixon is located in Hartford, 

Connecticut. The expense and time involved in Ms. Dixon traveling to San Francisco to appear in 

person at the Settlement Conference would be a substantial hardship. Although Ms. Dixon could 

have a local representative appear at the conference in her place, it would be more effective for 

settlement purposes if Ms. Dixon was able to appear telephonically. 

1 

APPLICATION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No: CV-09-0 1653-MHP 

Case 3:09-cv-01653-MHP Document 37 Filed 04/02/10 Page 1 of 2
Thus, Defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant this application for Ms. Dixon 

to appear telephonically at the April 16, 20 10 Settlement Conference. 

' Dated: March 26,20 10 JACKSON LEWIS LLP 

By: 

u~lison Cubre 

Attorneys for D '!,ant 

INTERNATIONAL SECURITY 

SERVICES, INC. 

71 ORDER 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, Defendant International Security Services 

Inc.'s insurance claims examiner, Shantel Dixon, may appear telephonically at the April 16, 201 0 

Settlement Conference. 

Dated: April 2, 20 10 - 

istrate Judge 

2 

APPLICATION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND 

[-I ORDER Case No: CV-09-01653-MHP 

April 2, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-01653-MHP Document 37 Filed 04/02/10 Page 2 of 2
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:08:31-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### SUBCHAPTER XLV—WHITESTONE COULEE UNIT, CHIEF JOSEPH DAM PROJECT, WASHINGTON
#### § 203.430 Sale of interests in insured mortgages.

No mortgagee may sell or otherwise dispose of any insured mortgage, or group of insured mortgages, or any partial interest in such mortgage or mortgages by means of any agreement, arrangement or device except pursuant to this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 229 (Friday, November 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Source Imaging Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 13, 2020, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Source Imaging 
Consortium, Inc. (``Open Source Imaging Consortium'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Vida Diagnostics, 
Inc., Coralville, IA; and University of Genoa, Genoa, ITALY, have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Open Source Imaging Consortium 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On March 20, 2019, Open Source Imaging Consortium filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 12, 2019 (84 FR 14973).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 19, 
2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 28, 2020 (85 FR 53402).

Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020-26188 Filed 11-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### Marat NASYBULIN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-77362.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 15, 2007.

Eric S. Merrifield, Esq., Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., Elizabeth J. Stevens, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marat Nasybulin, a native and citizen of Uzbekistan, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, *Singh v. INS,*295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002), we deny the petition for review.

Contrary to Nasybuliris contentions, the BIA considered the submitted evidence and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. *See id.*(the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen will be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §1600h. Separability

If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter and the application of such provision to other persons not similarly situated or to other circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 99–450, §10, Oct. 8, 1986, 100 Stat. 1134.)
### §9641. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–499, title V, §514(b), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1767

Section, Pub. L. 96–510, title II, §232, Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2804, provided for establishment of the Post-closure Liability Trust Fund in the Treasury of the United States.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 99–499, title V, §514(c), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1767, provided that:

"(1) In general.—The amendments made by this section [repealing this section and sections 4681 and 4682 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code] shall take effect on October 1, 1983.

"(2) Waiver of statute of limitations.—If on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1986] (or at any time within 1 year after such date of enactment) refund or credit of any overpayment of tax resulting from the application of this section is barred by any law or rule of law, refund or credit of such overpayment shall, nevertheless, be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before the date 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act."
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JER Investors
Trust Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph E. Robert, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 22, 2006



/S/    JOSEPH E. ROBERT, JR.Name: Joseph E. Robert, Jr.Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MIGUEL BELTRAN

(AC 25172)

Laveiy, C. J., and Schaller and Gruendel, Js.

Argued April 28

officially released May 31, 2005

Per Curiam.

This case is controlled by *State*v. *Chicano,*216 Conn. 699, 584 A.2d 425 (1990).

The judgment is affirmed.