alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3539a. Department of Housing and Urban Development Nonrecurring Expenses Fund

There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the "Department of Housing and Urban Development Nonrecurring Expenses Fund" (the Fund): Provided, That unobligated balances of expired discretionary funds appropriated for this or any succeeding fiscal year from the General Fund of the Treasury to the Department of Housing and Urban Development by this or any other Act may be transferred (not later than the end of the fifth fiscal year after the last fiscal year for which such funds are available for the purposes for which they were appropriated) into the Fund: Provided further, That amounts deposited in the Fund shall be available until expended, in addition to such other funds as may be available for such purposes, for capital needs of the Department, including facilities infrastructure and information technology infrastructure, subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget: Provided further, That amounts in the Fund may be obligated only after the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations are notified at least 15 days in advance of the planned use of funds.

(Pub. L. 118–42, div. F, title II, §235, Mar. 9, 2024, 138 Stat. 384.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act, 2024, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, and not as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act which comprises this chapter.
#### § 242.18 Inspection fee.

(a) The commitment may provide for the payment of an inspection fee in an amount not to exceed $5 per thousand dollars of the commitment. The inspection fee shall be paid no later than the time of initial endorsement.

(b) In the case of mortgages where the applicant is seeking only refinancing or acquisition, the inspection fee will not exceed 10 basis points on the loan. For applicants seeking a loan for refinancing or acquisition that also involves limited rehabilitation, the commitment shall provide for an inspection fee according to the following schedule:

| Hard cost % of mortgage amount | Inspection fee limit (basis points) |
| --- | --- |
| Less than 5% | 10 |
| 5% or greater but less than 10% | 20 |
| 10% or greater but less than 15% | 30 |
| 15% or greater but less than 20% | 40 |
| 20% or greater | 50 |

[[78 FR 8343](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-8343), Feb. 5, 2013]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2909

To reduce temporarily the duty on formulated product KROVAR IDF. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on formulated product 

KROVAR IDF.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATED PRODUCT KROVAR I DF . 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:
2

•HR 2909 IH 

‘‘ 9902.05.94 Formulated product 

KROVAR I DF containing 

active ingredients: [5-bromo3- sec-butyl-6- methyluracil] 

(a.k.a. bromacil) and [3-

(3,4- dichlorophenyl) 1,1-

dimethylurea] (a.k.a. diuron) 

and application adjuvants. 

(CAS Nos. 330–54–1 and 

314–40–9) (provided for in 

subheading 3808.30.15) ...... 2.5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the dateof enactment of this Act.

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Voorhees Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Tay, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

/s/ William Tay
-------------------------------
William Tay
President and Chief Accounting Officer
January 18, 2005
§ 16.3 Access to records. ( a ) *Grievance Board records.* The grievant and the grievant's representative shall have access to the record of proceedings, including the decision of the Board.
( b ) *Agency records.* ( 1 ) In considering the validity of a grievance, the Grievance Board shall have access, to the extent permitted by law, to any agency record considered by the Board to be relevant to the grievant and the subject matter of the grievance.
( 2 ) The agency shall, subject to applicable law, promptly furnish the grievant any agency record which the grievant requests to substantiate the grievance and which the agency or the Grievance Board determines is relevant and material to the proceeding. When deemed appropriate by the agency or the Board, a grievant may be supplied with only a summary of extract of classified material. If a request by a grievant for a document is denied prior to or during the agency's consideration of a grievance, such denial may be raised by the grievant as an integral part of the grievance before the Board.
( 3 ) These regulations do not require disclosure of any official agency record to the Grievance Board or a grievant where the head of agency or deputy determines in writing that such disclosure whould adversely affect the foreign policy or national security of the United States.
### SUBCHAPTER XLIX—TUALATIN PROJECT, OREGON
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Morris Weiss, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated November 20, 1958, denying, after a hearing, his *coram nobis*application to vacate a judgment of the same court, rendered November 15, 1954, convicting him, after trial, of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him to serve a term of 30 to 60 years. This *coram nobis*application was made on the ground that defendant was insane at the time of his trial. Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40488

Summary Calendar

 

JIMMY HORACE OAKLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOBBY WEAVER, Sheriff, Gregg

County; MARY STUART RUSSELL,

Officer, Longview Police Department,

ALVIN EBERSOLE, Officer, Longview 

Police Department,

Defendants,

MARY STUART RUSSELL, Officer, 

Longview Police Department,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-936

- - - - - - - - - -

November 2, 1998

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jimmy Horace Oakley, an inmate (# 606677) currently confined

in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional

Division appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit

following a bench trial, in which he had alleged that the 
No. 97-40488

-2-

appellee had used excessive force during Oakley’s arrest. Oakley

argues that key witnesses’ testimony during the bench trial was

false and that Officer Russell used excessive force when she

sprayed him with pepper spray as he entered the back seat of the

patrol car.

We have review the record and the parties’ briefs and hold

that the magistrate judge did not err in holding that the

appellee had not used excessive force during Oakley’s arrest. 

Spann v. Rainey, 987 F.2d 1110, 1115 (5th Cir. 1993); Lozano v.

Smith, 718 F.2d 756, 768 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, the

judgment of the magistrate judge is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 320.31 Default.

Upon default of the issuer, the Association has the right, pursuant to section 306(g) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1721(g)), to take title to the mortgages and other assets that are subject to the trust arrangements, and to proceed against other assets of the issuer to the extent necessary to satisfy its own claims and the rights of the holders of securities then outstanding. Such action by the Association shall be taken subject to an accounting to the issuer.
stratum10q93010ex101_11510.htm


 


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


 





 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  




 





 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  




.


 




  





  











  







.




  





  











  






 




  





  











  









  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  







 




  





  











  




.
#### § 203.269 Method of payment of periodic MIP.

In cases that the Commissioner deems appropriate, the Commissioner may require, by means of instructions communicated to all affected mortgagees, that periodic MIP be remitted electronically.

[60 FR 34138, June 30, 1995]
#### The People of the State of New York v. Maud L. White.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted, insofar as to enlarge the defendant-appellant’s time to bring on the appeal for argument up to and including the October 1960 Term of this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
§ 245.115 Protected activities. ( a ) Owners of multifamily housing projects covered under § 245.10, and their agents, must allow tenants and tenant organizers to conduct the following activities related to the establishment or operation of a tenant organization: ( 1 ) Distributing leaflets in lobby areas;
( 2 ) Placing leaflets at or under tenants' doors;
( 3 ) Distributing leaflets in common areas;
( 4 ) Initiating contact with tenants;
( 5 ) Conducting door-to-door surveys of tenants to ascertain interest in establishing a tenant organization and to offer information about tenant organizations;
( 6 ) Posting information on bulletin boards;
( 7 ) Assisting tenants to participate in tenant organization activities;
( 8 ) Convening regularly scheduled tenant organization meetings in a space on site and accessible to tenants, in a manner that is fully independent of management representatives. In order to preserve the independence of tenant organizations, management representatives may not attend such meetings unless invited by the tenant organization to specific meetings to discuss a specific issue or issues; and
( 9 ) Formulating responses to owner's requests for: ( i ) Rent increases;
( ii ) Partial payment of claims;
( iii ) The conversion from project-based paid utilities to tenant-paid utilities;
( iv ) A reduction in tenant utility allowances;
( v ) Converting residential units to non-residential use, cooperative housing, or condominiums;
( vi ) Major capital additions; and
( vii ) Prepayment of loans.
( b ) In addition to the activities listed in paragraph (a) of this section, owners of multifamily housing projects covered under § 245.10, and their agents, must allow tenants and tenant organizers to conduct other reasonable activities related to the establishment or operation of a tenant organization.
( c ) Owners of multifamily housing projects and their agents shall not require tenants and tenant organizers to obtain prior permission before engaging in the activities permitted under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
§ 513.410 Procedures. ( a ) *Investigation and referral.* Information concerning the existence of a cause for suspension from any source shall be promptly reported, investigated, and referred, when appropriate, to the suspending official for consideration. After consideration, the suspending official may issue a notice of suspension.
( b ) *Decisionmaking process.* Broadcasting Board of Governors shall process suspension actions as informally as practicable, consistent with principles of fundamental fairness, using the procedures in § 513.411 through § 513.413.
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 100 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 100 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 100 Filed 06/29/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 100 Filed 06/29/10 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 100 Filed 06/29/10 Page 5 of 5
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3033 

To extend the temporary reduction in duty on certain educational devices. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 22, 2005 

Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction in duty on certain 

educational devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL DEVICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.85.43 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain educational devices) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘1.67%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) in the effective period column, by striking 

10 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 
2 

•HR 3033 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §7382f. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated for the Program $700,000 for fiscal year 1995, and such sums as may be necessary for each of the four succeeding fiscal years.

#### (b) WERC program

There are authorized to be appropriated for the WERC program under section 7382e of this title such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 1995 and each of the four succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §518, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4044.)
#### § 221.780 Issuance of debentures.

Upon the exercise of the assignment option and the satisfactory performance of the requirements as to assignment set out in § 207.258 of this chapter, the Commissioner shall issue the assignor mortgagee debentures having a total par value equal to the amount of the original principal obligation of the mortgage which was unpaid on the date of the assignment, plus accrued interest to such date.

[59 FR 49816, Sept. 30, 1994]
### §399. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts June 25, 1910, ch. 407, §3, 36 Stat. 836; June 12, 1917, ch. 27, 40 Stat. 149, related to repayment of advances made under sections 397 and 398 of this title. See section 391a–1 of this title.
§ 214.600 Tribal housing counselor certification. ( a ) This subpart applies only to housing counseling required under or provided in connection with the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program or the Indian Community Development Block Grant (ICDBG) program. Indian Tribes, tribally designated housing entities (TDHEs), and other tribal entities funding housing counseling required under or provided in connection with IHBG or ICDBG programs shall not be subject to the requirements of this part, except as otherwise provided in this subpart.
( b ) Housing counseling required under or provided in connection with IHBG or ICDBG programs must be provided by a HUD-certified housing counselor or a HUD-certified Tribal housing counselor.
( c ) HUD will certify an individual housing counselor to provide housing counseling required under or provided in connection with IHBG or ICDBG programs upon verification that the person: ( 1 ) Passes a standardized written examination to demonstrate competency in each of the following areas: ( i ) Financial management;
( ii ) Property maintenance;
( iii ) Responsibilities of homeownership and tenancy;
( iv ) Fair housing laws and requirements;
( v ) Housing affordability; and
( vi ) Avoidance of, and response to, rental or mortgage delinquency and avoidance of eviction or mortgage default; and
( 2 ) Works for an Indian Tribe, TDHE, or other Tribal entity.
( d ) To provide housing counseling required under or provided in connection with HUD programs other than the IHBG and ICDBG programs, an individual working for an Indian Tribe, TDHE, or other Tribal entity must meet the housing counseling certification requirement under § 214.103(n), including the standardized written examination required under § 214.103(n)(2), and the Indian Tribe, TDHE, or other Tribal entity must be a participating agency).
( e ) Entities and individuals providing housing counseling under this subpart must be certified by the Office of Housing Counseling by 48 months from the effective date of this rule or 30 days after HUD makes the Tribal certification examination available, whichever is later. HUD will publish a document in the Federal Register to announce the start of the testing and certification requirement.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Stipulation Of Dismissal

Case No. C 09-00920 JSW

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN

Constantin V. Roboostoff (SBN 69328)

cvr1@earthlink.net

369 Pine Street, Suite 610

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone (415) 732-0282

Facsimile (415) 732-0287

Attorneys for plaintiff Jowena Tabayoyong

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOWENA TABAYOYONG, ) Case No. C 09-00920 JSW

 )

Plaintiff, )

 ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

 ) WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT

v. ) TO FED.R.CIV.P.41(1)

 )

THE PMI GROUP, INC. LONG TERM )

DISABILITY PLAN, THE PRUDENTIAL )

INSURANCE COMPANY OF )

AMERICA )

 )

 Defendants. )

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all parties to this action through their

designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice

pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party to bear its own fees and costs.

//

//

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-00920-JSW Document 36 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-00920-JSW Document35 Filed02/25/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

Stipulation Of Dismissal

Case No. C 09-00920 JSW

The parties seek the Court’s approval of dismissal of this action with prejudice, through

the order listed infra.

ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN

Dated: February 23, 2010 By: /s/ 

Constantin V. Roboostoff

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GORDON & REES LLP

Dated: February 23, 2010 By: /s/ 

Tad Devlin

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

 The Honorable Jeffrey S. White

United States District Judge

Case3:09-cv-00920-JSW Document35 Filed02/25/10 Page2 of 2

March 1, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00920-JSW Document 36 Filed 03/01/10 Page 2 of 2
### §451k. Availability of appropriations; expenses as nonreimbursable

Appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for carrying on the functions of the Bureau of Reclamation shall be available for credits, expenses, charges, and costs provided by or incurred under this subchapter. Expenses incurred in carrying out the provisions of sections 451 to 451f of this title, shall be nonreimbursable and nonreturnable under the Federal reclamation laws.

(Aug. 13, 1953, ch. 428, §13, 67 Stat. 568.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal reclamation laws, referred to in text, are identified in section 451i of this title.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Order re Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Production of Documents 

Case No. C 09-0671 CRB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEPHEN ARNOLD, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, et al., 

Defendants. 

__________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C 09-0671 CRB 

ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL FURTHER PRODUCTION OF 

DOCUMENTS 

Plaintiff Stephen Arnold’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents came on for hearing 

before this Court on April 20, 2010. Plaintiff was represented by Katherine O’Neal, Esq. 

Defendants were represented by Horace W. Green, Esq. 

Having reviewed the pleadings and papers on file, and having heard and considered 

arguments of counsel, the court rules as follows: 

1. Defendants shall produce copies of any claims handling procedures or guidelines in 

effect as of November 21, 2008 that concern the application or interpretation of the terms “third 

party settlement” and/or “deductible sources of income,” to the extent such documents have not 

already been produced. 

2. Defendants shall provide a declaration from Katherine Durrell explaining and identifying 

the “procedures” she described in her deposition that govern the allocation or apportionment of a 

“third party settlement” between amounts that may be offset against disability benefits and amounts 

which are not to be offset against disability benefits. Ms. Durrell is to clarify the procedures 

Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document 56 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Order Re Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Production of Documents 

Case No. C 09-0671 CRB 

2

UNUM claims personnel use “to determine what is offset able [sic] and what is not,” with respect to 

"third party settlements." 

3. Defendants shall produce the documents and declaration subject to this order no later 

than fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 26, 2010 ___________________________ 

 Elizabeth D. Laporte 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

 

Case 3:09-cv-00671-CRB Document 56 Filed 04/26/10 Page 2 of 2