alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 22, 2018

No. 04-17-00760-CR

Gregorio ROMERO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3427-B

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

By order dated December 28, 2017, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by 

January 11, 2018, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. By order 

dated January 17, 2018, we granted appellant’s request to extend the deadline for his response to 

January 22, 2018. On January 18, 2018, appellant filed a second motion requesting an additional 

extension of time to file his response because he did not have access to the reporter’s record.

In our order dated December 28, 2017, we questioned our jurisdiction to consider this 

appeal because appellant did not timely file his notice of appeal. We noted appellant seeks to 

appeal the trial court’s order denying his untimely motion for new trial; however, “[n]o Texas 

statute authorizes a direct appeal from the denial of a motion for new trial independently of the 

appeal of an underlying conviction.” Williams v. State, Nos. 02-17-00249-CR; 02-17-00250-CR 

& 02-17-00251-CR, 2017 WL 4819417, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Oct. 26, 2017, no pet.) 

(mem. op.; not designated for publication). Therefore, access to the reporter’s record is not 

needed for appellant to respond to our order. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. 

Appellant’s response to this court’s December 28, 2017 order must be filed no later than January 

29, 2018.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of January, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2947 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2947

    To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to 
   authorize the use of funds for the inclusion in domestic violence 
education programs of information on legal rights available to teenage 
                      victims of dating violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2005

    Ms. Millender-McDonald introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to 
   authorize the use of funds for the inclusion in domestic violence 
education programs of information on legal rights available to teenage 
                      victims of dating violence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teen Dating Violence Education Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Girls and women between the ages of 16 and 24 are the 
        most vulnerable to domestic violence, experiencing the highest 
        per capita rates of non-fatal intimate partner violence.
            (2) One third of teens report experiencing some kind of 
        abuse in their romantic relationships, including verbal and 
        emotional abuse.
            (3) Approximately 1 in 5 adolescent girls report being 
        physically or sexually hurt by a dating partner.
            (4) Forty percent of teenage girls ages 14 to 17 report 
        knowing someone their age who has been hit or beaten by a 
        boyfriend.
            (5) Twenty-six percent of girls in grades 9 to 12 have been 
        the victim of physical abuse, sexual abuse, or date rape.
            (6) Teenagers who are the victims of dating violence often 
        do not know the legal actions they can take to put an end to 
        the violence they are experiencing. These teenagers often do 
        not inquire into legal actions they can take because of the 
        perceived stigma of dating violence.

SEC. 3. INCLUSION IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS OF 
              INFORMATION ON LEGAL RIGHTS AVAILABLE TO TEENAGE VICTIMS 
              OF DATING VIOLENCE.

    Paragraph (2) of section 5571(c) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7275(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and are designed'' and inserting ``, are 
        designed''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, and include information specific to 
        the State involved regarding the legal rights available to 
        teenage victims of dating violence'' before the period.
                                 <all>
```
ex10_45.htm









Exhibit 10.45


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT







The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the "Employer") and John A. Saxton (the "Employee") wish to amend the Amended and Restated Employee's Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), dated April 1, 2007, to bring the Employment Agreement into compliance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and other authoritative guidance issued under that section.







WHEREAS, no payments of deferred compensation subject to Code section 409A have been made from the Employee's Employment Agreement (originally effective February 2, 1998, and amended April 1, 2000), and the Parties have been in operational compliance with Code section 409A since January 1, 2005.







WHEREAS, pursuant to IRS Notice 2007-86 and the final Treasury Regulations under Code section 409A, the Employment Agreement is being amended to comply with the final Treasury Regulations issued under Code section 409A.







Accordingly, effective April 1, 2007, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:







1.  The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6(e)(iii) is amended by deleting the phrase that appears in brackets (i.e., by deleting "[or less than fifty percent (50%), if the Employee becomes an independent contractor]").







2.  Section 10(g) – Arbitration of Disputes – is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of that Section:







"Any reimbursement of reasonable fees and expenses under this Section shall be paid by the Employer to the Employee by the March 15 following the end of the year during which the Employee prevails in the dispute giving rise to such reimbursement."







In all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective as specified herein.








	
ATTEST/WITNESS:

	  	
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	 	/s/ Robert M. Jakobe
	  	  	  	  	  
	
Print Name:  

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	
Print Name:

	
Robert M. Jakobe


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	/s/ John A. Saxton
	  	  	  	
John A. Saxton


	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp
### §9623. Reimbursement to local governments

#### (a) Application

Any general purpose unit of local government for a political subdivision which is affected by a release or threatened release at any facility may apply to the President for reimbursement under this section.

#### (b) Reimbursement

#### (1) Temporary emergency measures

The President is authorized to reimburse local community authorities for expenses incurred (before or after October 17, 1986) in carrying out temporary emergency measures necessary to prevent or mitigate injury to human health or the environment associated with the release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant. Such measures may include, where appropriate, security fencing to limit access, response to fires and explosions, and other measures which require immediate response at the local level.

#### (2) Local funds not supplanted

Reimbursement under this section shall not supplant local funds normally provided for response.

#### (c) Amount

The amount of any reimbursement to any local authority under subsection (b)(1) may not exceed $25,000 for a single response. The reimbursement under this section with respect to a single facility shall be limited to the units of local government having jurisdiction over the political subdivision in which the facility is located.

#### (d) Procedure

Reimbursements authorized pursuant to this section shall be in accordance with rules promulgated by the Administrator within one year after October 17, 1986.

(Pub. L. 96–510, title I, §123, as added Pub. L. 99–499, title I, §123(a), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1688.)
#### § 203.496 Actions to be taken by mortgagee or lender.

With respect to any action required by the mortgagee or lender within a period of time prescribed by this subpart the Commissioner may extend such period.
### §8852. Coordination of research and extension activities; consultative requirements

(a) The Secretary of Agriculture shall coordinate the applied research and extension programs conducted under this subchapter 1 and under the amendments made by this subchapter to section 1419 [7 U.S.C. 3154]1 and subtitle B of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 [7 U.S.C. 3129],1 section 1 of the Bankhead-Jones Act [7 U.S.C. 3104], section 3 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Research Act of 1978 [16 U.S.C. 1642], and sections 1 and 2 of the Smith-Lever Act [7 U.S.C. 341, 342] with the programs of the Department of Energy.

(b) In carrying out this subchapter and the amendments made by this subchapter, the Secretary of Agriculture shall consult on a continuing basis with—

(1) the Subcommittee on Food, Agricultural, and Forestry Research of the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering, and Technology;

(2) the Joint Council on Food and Agricultural Sciences; and

(3) the National Agricultural Research and Extension Users Advisory Board;

for the purpose of coordinating research and extension activities.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title II, §257, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 708; Pub. L. 97–98, title XIV, §1406(c), Dec. 22, 1981, 95 Stat. 1299.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle C (§§251–262) of title II of Pub. L. 96–294, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 705, which enacted this subchapter and sections 1435 and 3129 of Title 7, Agriculture, and amended sections 341, 342, 3104, and 3154 of Title 7 and sections 590h and 1642 of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of subtitle C to the Code, see Tables.

7 U.S.C. 3154, referred to in subsec. (a), was repealed by Pub. L. 110–246, title VII, §7110(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1980.

7 U.S.C. 3129, referred to in subsec. (a), was repealed by Pub. L. 101–624, title XVI, §1601(f)(1)(C), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3704.

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 97–98 substituted "Subcommittee on Food, Agricultural, and Forestry Research" for "Subcommittee on Food and Renewable Resources".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–98 effective Dec. 22, 1981, see section 1801 of Pub. L. 97–98, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of Title 7, Agriculture.

1 See References in Text note below.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Advisory 
Commission; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Chesapeake 
and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Chesapeake and 
Ohio Canal National Historical Park Advisory Commission (the 
Commission) will be held on Friday, January 21, 2005, at park 
headquarters, 1850 Dual Highway, Hagerstown, Maryland. The meeting will 
begin at 10 a.m.
    Items on the agenda include planning initiatives, construction and 
development projects, and park operational issues.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Any person may file with 
the Commission a written statement concerning the matters to be 
discussed. Persons who wish to file a written statement or testify at 
the meeting or who want further information concerning the meeting may 
contact Superintendent Kevin Brandt at (301) 714-2201.

DATES: January 21, 2005, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 1850 Dual Highway, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent Kevin Brandt, (301) 
714-2201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission was established by Public Law 
91-664 to meet and consult with the Secretary of the Interior on 
general policies and specific matters related to the administration and 
development of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
    Members of the Commission are: Mrs. Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld, 
Chairman, Mr. Charles J. Weir, Mr. Barry A. Passett, Mr. Terry W. 
Hepburn, Ms. JoAnn M. Spevacek, Mrs. Mary E. Woodward, Mrs. Donna 
Printz, Mrs. Ferial S. Bishop, Ms. Nancy C. Long, Mrs. Jo Reynolds, Dr. 
James H. Gilford, Brother James Kirkpatrick.

    Dated: November 23, 2004.
Kevin D. Brandt,
Superintendent, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
[FR Doc. 04-28291 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-52-M
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DANNY SAN NICOLAS,

Defendant. /

No. CR 09-966 CRB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

JOHNSON CLAIM RAISED IN

SECTION 2255 MOTION

Nicolas moves under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence,

arguing that it has been rendered invalid by Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). 

The government is hereby ORDERED to show cause why Nicolas’s § 2255 petition should

not be granted. The government is ORDERED to respond within 60 days after entry of this

Order. Nicolas shall file a reply brief not later than 30 days after the government’s response. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2016 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cr-00966-CRB Document 201 Filed 08/09/16 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 1 to Eclipsys Am & Restated 2005 Inducement Grant Incentive Plan



  
 Exhibit 10.17

 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO THE ECLIPSYS CORPORATION 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 

INDUCEMENT GRANT STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Eclipsys Corporation (“Eclipsys”) has established the Eclipsys Corporation Amended and Restated 2005 Inducement Grant Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 

WHEREAS, Eclipsys, Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (“Allscripts”) and Arsenal Merger Corporation have entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 9, 2010 (the “Merger Agreement”) under which Eclipsys will merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of Allscripts (the “Transaction”); 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Eclipsys has the authority under Section 11(d) of the Plan to amend the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to provide that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Allscripts will
administer the Plan effective on and after the effective time of the Transaction (the “Transaction Date”). 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment set forth in the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows effective on and after the Transaction Date: 
 1. By amending the third sentence of Section 1 to replace the term “Board of Directors of the Company” with the term “Board of Directors of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions,
Inc.” 
 2. By amending Section 3(b) to add the following new sentence to the end thereof: 

“Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, the Committee shall be entitled to exercise all of the powers of the Board under the
Plan without any further action by the Board to delegate these powers to the Committee. In addition, the term “Committee” shall mean the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (or a
subcommittee or subcommittee of the Board of Directors of Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. appointed by that board from among its members).” 
 3. By amending Section 10(f) to add the following new sentence to the end thereof: 
 “To the extent an outstanding Award requires Company action for the amendment of such award, the Board or Committee shall act on behalf of the Company.” 

4. Except as hereinabove amended and modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0390 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2014-CE-013-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### James C. Heaney, Respondent, v. John E. Drury, Jr., et al., Doing Business as Desmond & Drury, Appellants.

— ■ Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, granting plaintiff’s motion for a preference.) Present — Bastow, J. P. Goldman, Halpern, McClusky, and Henry, JJ. ■
§ 221.252 Substitute mortgagors. ( a ) *Selling mortgagor.* The mortgagee may effect the release of a mortgagor from personal liability on the mortgage note only if it obtains the Commissioner's approval of a substitute mortgagor, as provided by this section.
( b ) *Purchasing mortgagor.* The Commissioner may approve a substitute mortgagor with respect to any mortgage insured under subpart A of this part, if the substitute mortgagor is to occupy the dwelling as a principal residence or a secondary residence (as these terms are defined in § 221.20(c)) or is a private nonprofit or public entity as provided in section 221(h) of the National Housing Act.
( c ) *Applicability—current mortgagor.* Paragraph (b) of this section applies to the Commissioner's approval of a substitute mortgagor, only if the mortgage executed by the original mortgagor met the conditions of § 203.258(c) of this chapter.
( d ) *Applicability—earlier mortgagor.* The occupancy and similar requirements set forth in § 203.258(d) of this chapter apply to mortgages insured under subpart A of this part.
( e ) Mortgagees approved for participation in the Direct Endorsement program under § 203.3 of this chapter may, subject to limitations established by the Commissioner, themselves approve an appropriate substitute mortgagor under the section and need not obtain further specific approval from the Commissioner.
( f ) *Definition.* As used in this section, the term *substitute mortgagor* includes: ( 1 ) Persons who, upon the release by a mortgagee of a previous mortgagor from personal liability on the mortgage note, assume this liability and agree to pay the mortgage debts and
( 2 ) Persons who purchase without assuming liability on the mortgage note or purchase where no release is given by the mortgagee to the previous mortgagor.
[55 FR 34810, Aug. 24, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 58351, Dec. 9, 1992]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 27, 2019

No. 04-18-00833-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.G. AND Z.A.G., CHILDREN

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017FLI001815 C3

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant, indigent and proceeding pro se, has filed a second motion for extension of 

time to file the appellant’s brief in which he states that the clerk’s record “is currently incomplete

. . . since the (CR) filed goes up to the date of May 6, 2019 Ex. A but the trial court 

summary/docket sheet goes to June 19, 2019 Ex. B.” The original clerk’s record was filed in this 

court on May 9, 2019. Thereafter, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed on June 11, 2019, 

which contains the trial court’s “Order Granting Special Appearance by Webb County and Ponce 

Trevino, Setting Aside Default Judgment Against Ponce Trevino and Disposing of Motions Filed 

by Abelardo G. Gonzalez” signed on June 4, 2019. A second supplemental clerk’s record was 

filed on June 20, 2019, which contains the trial court’s “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 

Law” signed on June 18, 2019. Therefore, the clerk’s record filed in this court is complete. The 

clerk of this court is instructed to send appellant a copy of the two supplemental clerk’s records 

for use in preparation of the appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is 

GRANTED. The appellant’s brief is due on October 25, 2019, with no further extensions absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of September, 2019.
___________________________________

Luz Estrada,

Chief Deputy Clerk