alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael Baran et al., Respondents, v. City of Cohoes et al., Appellants.

Defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court which temporarily restrained them, pending trial, from proceeding with the sale of notes and bonds authorized by three ordinances of the City of Cohoes. The ordinances provide for reconstructing and resurfacing certain streets and for constructing and reconstructing certain sewers, and provide for a tax to be levied upon all taxable property in the city to pay therefor. Plaintiffs contend that all three ordinances are illegal because they are in violation of the city charter, which, plaintiffs contend, requires that part of the cost of the improvements be assessed against the adjacent properties benefiting therefrom. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction. The pleadings present issues as to which sections of the city charter are applicable to the particular improvements, and as to the interpretation of several sections. These issues cannot and should not be decided with finality on a motion for a temporary injunction. The papers present ample justification for granting a discretionary order retaining the *status quo*until trial. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keith Bruce Morgan, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant and codefendant Debra Jean Lockhart were convicted, upon their pleas of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law, § 155.30). They had been arrested and charged with burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the third degree on October 6, 1973, and arraigned on October 7, 1973. Following a preliminary hearing on October 15, 1973, the matter was referred to the Monroe County Grand Jury which handed down an indictment against both defendants on April 26, 1974—six months and 20 days after commencement of the criminal action. On May 23, 1974, the defendants moved to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 and 210.20 on the ground that they had been denied a speedy trial. The motion was denied on June 6, 1974 and defendants pleaded guilty on July 2, 1974. Because more than six months had elapsed between the commencement of the action and the indictment, *1179the motion should have been granted. (See *People v Washington,*43 NY2d 772.) We commend the District Attorney’s fairness in conceding that the delay was not attributable to the defendants and that there were no exceptional circumstances which would excuse the delay. The convictions should be reversed and the indictment dismissed. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court—grand larceny, third degree.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Hancock, Jr. and Witmer, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tab
A. Keplinger, Chief Financial Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           /S/ TAB A. KEPLINGER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Tab A. Keplinger
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           May 17, 2004
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roslyn
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph L. Mancino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented in the Report.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Joseph L.
Mancino

Joseph L. Mancino

Chief Executive Officer

May 1, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. and will be
retained by Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



29
### §7382e. Waste management education research consortium (WERC)

#### (a) 1 In general

The Secretary is authorized to establish a partnership of Department of Energy laboratories, academic institutions, and private sector industries to conduct environmentally-related education programs, including programs involving environmentally conscious manufacturing and waste management activities that have undergraduate and graduate educational training as a component.

(Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §517, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4044.)

1 So in original. No subsec. (b) has been enacted.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2977 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, as the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, as 

the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PAUL KASTEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, 

6 Montana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Paul 

7 Kasten Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•HR 2977 IH 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ
§ 521.8 Service of complaint. ( a ) Service of a complaint must be made by certified or registered mail or by delivery in any manner authorized by rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Service is complete upon receipt.
( b ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom the complaint was served, and the manner and date of service, may be made by: ( 1 ) Affidavit of the individual serving the complaint by delivery;
( 2 ) A United States Postal Service return receipt card acknowledging receipt; or
( 3 ) Written acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant or the defendant's representative.
( 4 ) In case of service abroad authenticated in accordance with the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extra Judicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters.
#### HOAGLAND & ROBINSON CO., Respondent, v. ROBINSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 6, 1903.)

Action by Hoagland & Robinson Company against Samuel A. Robinson and others. L. J. Jersawitz, for appellants. J. E. Bullen, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Tribal NSR Meeting

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On May 4, 2011, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

participated in a outreach/consultation conference call to answer questions from various 

tribes on the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country,” 

commonly known as the “Tribal NSR Rule.” During this meeting, various tribal 

representatives discussed their general concerns and questions related to this action, 

including: 

• Allowable-to-Allowable Applicability Test. Several tribal representatives were 

interested in understanding this applicability test.

• General Permits. A couple of tribal representatives were interested in knowing 

what a general permit is and if general permits could be developed for the hot mix 

asphalt plants source category.

• Adequate Resources to Implement the Program. A few tribal representatives were 

concerned about the resources EPA has available to implement the Tribal NSR 

rule.

• Offsets. Several tribal representatives were interested in knowing how offsets 

will work on tribal lands and what options we had proposed to address the lack of 

availability of offsets in Indian country.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 8, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131538 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan LINSEY PORTER, Petitioner-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131538 COA: 263470 Wayne CC: 04-419307-AA CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, Respondent-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J., concurs and states as follows:

I would affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, al beit for a different reason. I find it unnecessary to addre ss whether § 21(1)(q) of th e Local Government Fiscal Responsibility Act, MCL 141. 1221(1)(q), has retroactive effect because I believe that the then-applicable provisions of § 21 of the act, in conjunc tion with § 5c(b) of the Home Rule City Act, MCL 117.5c(b ), afforded the emerg ency financial manager the authority to undertake the action that is in dispute in this case.

p1205 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 8, 2006

Clerk
#### § 203.266 Period covered by periodic MIP.

The initial MIP shall cover the period beginning with the date of the issuance of a Mortgage Insurance Certificate and ending on the next anniversary of the beginning of amortization. Subsequent premium payments shall cover the twelve-month period preceding each subsequent anniversary date.

[48 FR 28805, June 23, 1983]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is a cooperating federal agency, having jurisdiction by law because of the proposed federal action has the potential for significant wetland impacts.

# ACTION:

Amended notice of public comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing this amended notice to advise the public that the public comment period for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS)—Proposed Relocation of the Panama City—Bay County International Airport, has been extended from January 21, 2005, to January 28, 2005, due to requests from the public. Original notices of availability of the DEIS was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         by USEPA on November 26, 2004 [68 FR 68899] and by FAA on December 3, 2004 [69 FR 70302]. Written requests for the DEIS and written comments on the DEIS can be submitted to the individual listed in the section                         **For Further Information Contact**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Virginia Lane, Environmental Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Orlando Airports District Office, Suite 400, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Orlando, Florida 32822. Ms. Lane can be contacted at (407) 812-6331 (voice), (407) 812-6978 (facsimile).

Issued in Washington, DC on December 13, 2004.

Ralph Thompson,

Manager, Community and Environmental Needs Division, Office of Airport Planning and Programming.

[FR Doc. 04-27691  Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1




ACKNOWLEDGEMENT




You accept, agree and acknowledge that you will be paid a cash bonus of seventy thousand
dollars ($70,000) (the “Special Bonus”) within thirty (30) calendar days after your signature
below. If your employment terminates for any reason during the first twelve (12) months following
the date set forth below, you will repay one hundred percent (100%) of the Special Bonus less a
prorated amount of the Special Bonus equal to the period of your employment since the date set
forth below.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	/s/ Igal P. Zamir
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	IGAL P. ZAMIR
	 

	 	Date: August 9, 2010






	 	 	 	 	 
	ACCEPTED & AGREED TO:



MAPCO EXPRESS, INC.

 	 	 
	  	/s/ Mark B. Cox
 	 	 
	 	By: 	 	 
	 	Title: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	  	/s/ Kent B. Thomas
 	 	 
	 	By: Kent B. Thomas 	 	 
	 	Title:  	General Counsel / Secretary
### §§3901 to 3906. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §474(e)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1239

Section 3901, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §402, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 513, set out a Congressional statement of purpose for this chapter.

Section 3902, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §403, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 514, provided Secretary with authority to guarantee obligations.

Section 3903, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §404, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 514, related to eligible new community development entitled to guarantees under this chapter.

Section 3904, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §405, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 514, related to eligibility of bonds, debentures, notes, and other obligations under this chapter.

Section 3905, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §406, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 515, related to fees and charges for guarantees and the submission of a report to Congress concerning such fees and charges.

Section 3906, Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §407, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 515; Pub. L. 91–351, title VII, §703, July 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 462; Pub. L. 91–609, title III, §303(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1780, provided for a revolving guarantee fund. Section 4528 of this title transferred all receipts, funds, or other assets and all liabilities of the revolving fund established under this section to the revolving fund established under section 4518 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 90–448, title IV, §401, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 513, which provided that this title, which enacted this chapter and amended section 1492 of this title and sections 371 and 1464 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, may be referred to as the "New Communities Act of 1968", was repealed by Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §474(e)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1239.

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title IV, §474(e)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1239, provided that: "Any actions taken, prior to repeal, under the authority of any of the sections which are repealed by this section [repealing sections 3901 to 3906, 3908, 3909, 3911, 3914, 4511 to 4524, and 4528 to 4532 of this title] shall continue to be valid. Nothing in this subsection shall impair the validity of any guarantees which have been made pursuant to title IV [of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.] or title VII [of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.] and any such guarantees shall continue to be governed by the provisions of title IV or title VII, as applicable, as they existed immediately before the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 30, 1983]."
Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 70 Filed 08/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

It is so ordered.

Dated: _________________

______________________________________

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

2

August 12, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-01703-BZ Document 70 Filed 08/12/10 Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 28—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO PUBLIC LANDS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—PATENTS FOR PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS

Sec.
1151 to 1156. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—DISPOSITION OF SUSPENDED ENTRIES AND CLAIMS; INVALID AND DEFECTIVE CLAIMS AND PATENTS THEREFOR

1161 to 1167. Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—SALES OF ISOLATED TRACTS

1171 to 1177. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—TIMBER CULTURE

1181.
Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—OREGON AND CALIFORNIA RAILROAD AND COOS BAY WAGON ROAD GRANT LANDS

1181a, 1181b. Transferred.
1181c.
Repealed.
1181d to 1181j. Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS ON PUBLIC LANDS

1185 to 1188. Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—EVIDENCES OF TITLE

1191 to 1193. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER VIII—INDIAN LANDS

1195 to 1197. Transferred.
1198 to 1200e. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER IX—ENFORCEMENT OF PROVISIONS

1201.
Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER X—OATHS IN CERTAIN LAND MATTERS

1211, 1212. Transferred.

#### SUBCHAPTER XI—WISCONSIN RIVER AND LAKE LAND TITLES

1221 to 1223. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER XII—MOVING EXPENSES RESULTING FROM ACQUISITION OF LANDS BY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR

1231 to 1234. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER XIII—STATE CONTROL OF NOXIOUS PLANTS ON GOVERNMENT LANDS

1241 to 1243. Transferred.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2852 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2852

    To extend the suspension of duty on Tetraacetylethylenediamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2005

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the suspension of duty on Tetraacetylethylenediamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRAACETYLETHYLENEDIAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.70 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Tetraacetylethylenediamine) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §7266. Designation of conservation officers

The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Transportation, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Interior, the United States Postal Service, and the Administrator of General Services shall each designate one Assistant Secretary or Assistant Administrator, as the case may be, as the principal conservation officer of such Department or of the Administration. Such designated principal conservation officer shall be principally responsible for planning and implementation of energy conservation programs by such Department or Administration and principally responsible for coordination with the Department of Energy with respect to energy matters. Each agency, Department or Administration required to designate a principal conservation officer pursuant to this section shall periodically inform the Secretary of the identity of such conservation officer, and the Secretary shall periodically publish a list identifying such officers.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §656, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 602.)
#### John H. Brown, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0676 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM182AD

AIR CRUISERS A320 004 -25 - 85 --- 11/30/10 AIR CRUISERS A320 004 -25 - 85, R1 --- 9/30/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Avi ation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
### §6730. Payments

#### (a) Time and amount

From the amount allocated for State and local governments under section 6723 of this title, the Secretary shall pay not later than five days after the beginning of each quarter to each State and to each local government which has filed a statement of assurances under section 6725 of this title, an amount equal to the amount allocated to such State or local government under section 6723 of this title.

#### (b) Adjustments

Payments under this subchapter may be made with necessary adjustments on account of overpayments or underpayments.

#### (c) Termination

No amount shall be paid to any State or local government under the provisions of this section for any calendar quarter if—

(1) the average rate of unemployment within the jurisdiction of such State or local government during the most recent calendar quarter which ended three months before the beginning of such calendar quarter was less than 4.5 percent, or

(2) the rate of unemployment within the jurisdiction of such government for the last month of the most recent calendar quarter which ended three months before the beginning of such calendar quarter did not exceed 4.5 percent.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title II, §210, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 1009; Pub. L. 94–447, title II, §201 (5), Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1498.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 94–447 substituted "4.5 percent, or" for "4.5 percent, and".