Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2004 / Notices 76467

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[OECA–2004–0016; FRL–7851–3] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB Review 

and Approval; Comment Request; 

NESHAP for Petroleum Refineries 

(Renewal), ICR Number 1692.05, OMB 

Number 2060–0340

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, this 

document announces that an 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

has been forwarded to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. This is a request 

to renew an existing approved 

collection. This ICR is scheduled to 

expire on December 31, 2004. Under 

OMB regulations, the Agency may 

continue to conduct or sponsor the 

collection of information while this 

submission is pending at OMB. This ICR 

describes the nature of the information 

collection and its estimated burden and 

cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before January 20, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing docket ID number OECA–

2004–0016, to (1) EPA online using 

EDOCKET (our preferred method), by email to docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail 

to: Environmental Protection Agency, 

EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), 

Enforcement and Compliance Docket 

and Information Center, Mail Code 

2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, 

NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) 

OMB at: Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), 

Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 

17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan 

Chadwick, Compliance Assessment and 

Media Programs Division, Office of 

Compliance, Mail Code 2223A, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: (202) 564–7054; fax number: 

(202) 564–0050; e-mail address: 

chadwick.dan@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On May 25, 2004, (69 FR 29718), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under Docket ID No. OECA–

2004–0016, which is available for public 

viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/

DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC. The EPA Docket Center Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Reading Room is (202) 

566–1744, and the telephone number for 

the Enforcement and Compliance 

Docket and Information Center is: (202) 

566–1752. An electronic version of the 

public docket is available through EPA 

Dockets (EDOCKET) at http://

www.epa.gov/edocket. Use EDOCKET to 

submit or view public comments, access 

the index listing of the contents of the 

public docket, and to access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. When in the 

system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the 

docket ID number identified above. 

Any comments related to this ICR 

should be submitted to EPA and OMB 

within 30 days of this notice. EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives 

them and without change, unless the 

comment contains copyrighted material, 

confidential business information (CBI), 

or other information whose public 

disclosure is restricted by statute. When 

EPA identifies a comment containing 

copyrighted material, EPA will provide 

a reference to that material in the 

version of the comment that is placed in 

EDOCKET. The entire printed comment, 

including the copyrighted material, will 

be available in the public docket. 

Although identified as an item in the 

official docket, information claimed as 

CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise 

restricted by statute, is not included in 

the official public docket, and will not 

be available for public viewing in 

EDOCKET. For further information 

about the electronic docket, see EPA’s 

Federal Register notice describing the 

electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 (May 

31, 2002), or go to http://www.epa.gov/

edocket.

Title: NESHAP for Petroleum 

Refineries (40 CFR part 63, subpart CC) 

(Renewal). 

Abstract: The National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) From Petroleum Refineries, 

published at 40 CFR part 63, subpart 

CC, were proposed on July 15, 1994, and 

promulgated on August 18, 1995. These 

regulations apply to the following 

existing and new petroleum refining 

process units and emission points 

located at refineries that are major 

sources of HAPs: miscellaneous process 

vents, storage vessels, wastewater 

streams and treatment operations, 

equipment leaks, gasoline loading racks, 

and marine vessel loading operations. 

These regulations also apply to storage 

vessels and equipment leaks associated 

with bulk gasoline terminals or pipeline 

breakout stations that are related to an 

affected petroleum refinery. New 

facilities include those that commenced 

construction or reconstruction after the 

date of proposal. This information is 

being collected to assure compliance 

with 40 CFR part 63, subpart CC.

Respondents are required to submit 

one-time reports of start of construction, 

anticipated and actual start-up dates, 

and physical or operational changes to 

existing facilities. In addition, 

respondents must submit three types of 

reports: (1) Notification of Compliance 

Status, (2) Periodic Reports, and (3) 

Other event triggered reports. The 

Notification of Compliance Status is 

submitted to provide the information 

necessary to demonstrate that 

compliance has been achieved. The 

Periodic Reports provide information on 

monitored control device parameters 

when they are outside of established 

ranges and information on instances 

where inspections revealed problems. In 

addition, respondents are required to 

comply with the recordkeeping and 

reporting requirements contained in the 

following rules: either 40 CFR part 61, 

subpart VV or 40 CFR part 63, subpart 

H for equipment leaks (which include 

an initial report and semiannual 

summaries of leak detection and repair); 

40 CFR part 61, subpart FF for 

wastewater operations; portions of 40 

CFR part 63, subpart R for gasoline 

loading racks; and 40 CFR part 63, 

subpart Y for marine tank vessel loading 

operations. All records are to be 

maintained at the facility for at least 5 

years. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. The OMB Control 

Numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed 

in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 

15, and are identified on the form and/

or instrument, if applicable. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 839 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

76468 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2004 / Notices 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements; train personnel to be able 

to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; 

complete and review the collection of 

information; and transmit or otherwise 

disclose the information. 

Respondents/Affected Entities:

Petroleum refineries that are major 

sources of HAP emissions. 

Estimated Number of Respondents:

134. 

Frequency of Response: Annual, 

Semiannual, On Occasion, Quarterly. 

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:

410,054 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Costs:

$26,163,236, which includes $0 annual 

capital/startup costs, $0 annual O&M 

costs, and $26,163,236 annual labor 

costs. 

Changes in the Estimates: There is a 

decrease of 59,376 hours in the total 

estimated burden currently identified in 

the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR 

Burdens. This adjustment decrease in 

burden is due to several factors, 

including: a decrease in the number of 

respondents, the removal of capital/

startup costs resulting from performance 

tests, and revisions to the approach to 

calculating costs for newly subject 

facilities.

Dated: December 14, 2004. 

Oscar Morales, 

Director, Collection Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 04–27889 Filed 12–20–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

SES Performance Review Board

ACTION: Notice of Members of the U.S. 

Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission Performance Review Board 

(PRB). 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 

appointment of members of the PRB for 

the Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission (EEOC). The Board reviews 

the performance appraisals of career and 

non-career senior executives. The Board 

makes recommendations regarding 

proposed performance appraisals, 

ratings, bonuses and other appropriate 

personnel actions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angelica E. Ibarguen, Chief Human 

Capital Officer, Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission, 1801 L Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663–

4306. 

Composition of PRB: The Board shall 

consist of at least three voting members. 

When appraising a career appointee’s 

performance or recommending a career 

appointee for a performance award, 

more than half of the members must be 

SES career appointees. The names and 

titles of the PRB members are as follows: 

Primary Members 

Angelica E. Ibarguen, Chief Human 

Capital Officer, EEOC—(Chairperson), 

Reuben Daniels, Jr., Director, Charlotte 

District Office, EEOC—(Member), James 

L. Lee, Deputy General Counsel, 

EEOC—(Member).

DATES: Membership is effective on the 

date of this notice.

Signed at Washington, DC on this 22nd day 

of November 2004.

For the Commission. 

Cari M. Dominguez, 

Chair.

[FR Doc. 04–27855 Filed 12–20–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6570–01–M

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[CC Docket No. 98–98; DA 04–3678] 

Parties Asked To Refresh the Record 

Regarding a Petition by the New York 

State Public Service Commission 

Seeking Broad Delegated Authority To 

Make Area Code Changes Outside the 

Context of Area Code Relief Planning

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice; solicitation of 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Commission invites New 

York State Public Service Commission 

(NYPSC) to update the record pertaining 

to its petition seeking delegated 

authority to make area code changes 

outside the context of area code relief 

planning and invites interested parties 

to submit pleadings pertaining to the 

NYPSC petition.

DATES: Comments are due on or before 

January 4, 2005. Reply Comments are 

due on or before January 11, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Parties who choose to file 

by paper must file an original and four 

copies of each filing. All filings must be 

sent to the Commission’s Secretary, 

Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the 

Secretary, Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. See 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 

where and how to file comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Franklin, Attorney, Wireline 

Competition Bureau, 

Telecommunications Access Policy 

Division, (202) 418–7400 TTY: (202) 

418–0484.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Public 

Notice released November 23, 2004 in 

CC Docket No. 98–98; DA 04–3678. The 

full text of this document is available for 

public inspection during regular 

business hours in the FCC Reference 

Center, Room CY–A257, 445 Twelfth 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

Pursuant to § 1.1 of the Commission’s 

rules, the Commission invites the 

NYPSC to update the record pertaining 

to its petition seeking delegated 

authority to make area code changes 

outside the context of area code relief 

planning and invites interested parties 

to submit pleadings pertaining to the 

NYPSC petition. 

In the Local Competition Second 

Report and Order, the Commission 

delegated authority to implement new 

area codes to state commissions in the 

context of area code relief planning. The 

Commission noted that state 

commissions are uniquely positioned to 

understand local conditions and what 

effect new area codes will have on those 

conditions. Each state’s implementation 

method is, however, subject to the 

Commission’s guidelines for numbering 

administration. Existing Commission 

guidelines, which were originally 

enumerated in the Ameritech Order, 

state that numbering administration 

should: (1) Seek to facilitate entry into 

the communications marketplace by 

making numbering resources available 

on an efficient and timely basis; (2) not 

unduly favor or disadvantage any 

particular industry segment or group of 

consumers; and (3) not unduly favor one 

technology over another. 

The NYPSC petitioned the 

Commission for delegated authority to 

make area codes changes outside the 

context of area code relief planning. 

Because the passage of time and 

intervening developments may have 

rendered the record developed for this 

petition stale, the Wireline Competition 

Bureau requests that the NYPSC identify 

whether the pursuit of area code relief 

outside the context of area code relief 

planning remains an issue. Also, some 

issues raised in the petition may have