alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNIFRAX
CORPORATION  AND  SUBSIDIARIES   CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS  OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THEIR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                              2,965
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      15,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          829
<INVENTORY>                                                         8,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   28,915
<PP&E>                                                             75,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    (40,164)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     87,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                              27,406
<BONDS>                                                            96,000
<COMMON>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                        (39,512)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       87,399
<SALES>                                                            62,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   62,281
<CGS>                                                              32,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      32,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      737
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  8,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     4,624
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        1,770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 2,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                        2,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2781 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2781

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Naugard 412S.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Naugard 412S.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAUGARD 412S.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.98      Pentaerythritol     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         tetrakis-(3-                                                       31/2008
                         laurylthiopropion
                         ate) (CAS No.
                         29598-76-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2930.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### O’BRIEN et al., Respondents, v. DWYER et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 30, 1903.)

Action by Henry O’Brien and others, constituting the Syracuse Stock & Grain Company, against John J. Dwyer, Clarence E. Oooley, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, and questions to be certified to be settled before Mr. Justice HISCOCK at his chambers in Syracuse.
#### Edward Toledano, Appellant, v. Roger White et al., Respondents.

Order entered March 31, 1960, which directed *inter alia*transfer of defendants’ stock in a co-operative apartment, unanimously modified on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion as hereinafter set forth, and as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant. There shall be inserted after the second ordering paragraph a further and additional paragraph reading as follows: “ ordered, that the defendants, within twenty (20) days after service of a copy of this order, shall, in good faith, take any and all steps necessary to procure the consent of 435 East 57th Street Apartments, Inc. to the transfer and sale of the proprietary lease and stock to the plaintiff, and, in the event such consent be obtained, to deliver up and surrender possession of said apartment 5B to plaintiff as hereinafter directed; and it is further ”. The fourth ordering paragraph of the order appealed from is modified by insertion of the words “and surrender possession to the plaintiff of” after the word “vacate”, so that such paragraph shall read as follows: “ordered, that in the event such consent is obtained the defendants shall vacate and surrender possession to the plaintiff of Apartment 5B, 435 East 57th Street, New York, New York, within ninety (90) days after the delivery of the said certified check to the said defendants’ attorneys, Bijur & Herts, Esqs.; and it is further ”. The fifth ordering paragraph of the order appealed from is modified by insertion of the *458words “ and surrender of possession to plaintiff ” immediately after and following the word “ apartment ”, so that such paragraph shall read as follows: “ ordered, that, immediately upon defendants’ removal from said apartment and surrender of possession to plaintiff, plaintiff’s attorney, Phineas Toby, Esq., shall deliver the said certificates of stock held by him in escrow to the plaintiff; and it is further”. The order appealed from is further modified by the insertion of an additional ordering paragraph following the sixth ordering paragraph therein, in the language following: “ ordered, that, if the consent of 435 East 57th Street Apartments, Inc., as aforesaid, cannot, in good faith, be obtained, the defendants, within ten (10) days following the expiration of the twenty (20) day period above, may, upon proper written proof of defendants’ inability to perform by reason *of*the withholding of such consent, make application for a modification of the judgment herein, and pending the determination thereof proceedings for punishment shall be stayed; and it is otherwise further.” Settle order on notice. Concur.— Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2749 

To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind the counter 

in retail sales. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind 

the counter in retail sales. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RETAIL SALES OF CIGARETTE PRODUCTS. 

4 (a) PRODUCT PLACEMENT.—It shall be unlawful for 

5 any person engaged in the retail sales of cigarette products 

6 to place cigarette products in the general merchandise 

7 areas of a retail sales facility and within reach of cus8 tomers. All cigarette products sold at retail must be placed 

9 under or behind a counter where they may be accessible 

10 only to a salesperson. 
2 

•HR 2749 IH 

1 (b) ENFORCEMENT.— 

2 (1) UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE ACT OR PRAC3 TICE.—A violation of this Act shall be treated as a 

4 violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act 

5 or practice prescribed under section 18(a)(1)(B) of 

6 the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 57a(a)(1)(B)). 

8 (2) ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.—The Federal 

9 Trade Commission shall enforce this Act in the same 

10 manner, by the same means, and with the same ju11 risdiction, powers, and duties as though all applica12 ble terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Com13 mission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incor14 porated into and made a part of this Act. 

Æ
§ 518.30 Purpose of property standards. ( a ) Sections 518.31 through 518.37 set forth uniform standards governing management and disposition of property furnished by the Federal Government whose cost was charged to a project supported by a Federal award. Federal awarding agencies shall require recipients to observe these standards under awards and shall not impose additional requirements, unless specifically required by Federal statute. The recipient may use its own property management standards and procedures provided it observes the provisions of §§ 518.31 through 518.37.
§ 206.134 Partial release, addition or substitution of security. ( a ) A mortgagee shall not release the security or any part thereof, while the mortgage is insured, without the prior consent of the Commissioner.
( b ) A mortgagee may, with the prior consent of the Commissioner, accept an addition to, or substitution of, security for the purpose of removing the dwelling to a new lot or replacing the dwelling with a similar or like kind on the existing lot under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The mortgagee obtains a good and valid first lien on the property to which the dwelling is removed or the existing lot upon which the dwelling is rebuilt;
( 2 ) All damages to the structure are repaired or all rebuilding of the structure is completed without cost to FHA; and
( 3 ) The property to which the dwelling is removed or rebuilt is in an area known to be reasonably free from natural hazards or, if in a flood zone, the borrower will insure or reinsure under the National Flood Insurance Program or obtain equivalent private flood insurance coverage, as defined in § 203.16a of this chapter.
( c ) A mortgagee may, without the prior consent of the Commissioner, accept an addition to, or substitution of, security for the purpose of removing the dwelling to a new lot under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The dwelling has survived an earthquake or other disaster with little damage, but continued location on the property might be hazardous;
( 2 ) The conditions stated in paragraph (b) of this section exist; and
( 3 ) Immediately following the emergency removal the mortgagee notifies the Commissioner of the reasons for removal.
[82 FR 7117, Jan. 19, 2017, as amended at 87 FR 70744, Nov. 21, 2022]
```

[106th Congress Public Law 296]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ296.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1044]]

Public Law 106-296
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2000 -  [H.R. 1605]>>  designate the Federal 
building and United States courthouse located at 402 North Walnut Street 
  in Harrison, Arkansas, as the ``J. Smith Henley Federal Building and 
                       United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 402 
North Walnut Street in Harrison, Arkansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``J. Smith Henley Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``J. Smith Henley Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 13, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1605:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-536 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            Apr. 3, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
      99.1





CERTIFICATION





The
      undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as
      trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 (the “Trust”) hereby
      makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s
      annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the
      “Annual Report”):





1.   The
      Trustee
      is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.





2.   Based
      on my
      knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has
      fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement.





By:
                /s/ Marlene
                Fahey
              Name:   Marlene
                Fahey
              Title:     Vice
                President
              Date:     March
                28, 2007
### §9001. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

(a) The Congress finds that—

(1) the supply of nonrenewable fuels in the United States is slowly being depleted;

(2) alternative sources of energy must be developed;

(3) ocean thermal energy is a renewable energy resource that can make a significant contribution to the energy needs of the United States;

(4) the technology base for ocean thermal energy conversion has improved over the past two years, and has consequently lowered the technical risk involved in constructing moderate-sized pilot plants with an electrical generating capacity of about ten to forty megawatts;

(5) while the Federal ocean thermal energy conversion program has grown in size and scope over the past several years, it is in the national interest to accelerate efforts to commercialize ocean thermal energy conversion by building pilot and demonstration facilities and to begin planning for the commercial demonstration of ocean thermal energy conversion technology;

(6) a strong and innovative domestic industry committed to the commercialization of ocean thermal energy conversion must be established, and many competent domestic industrial groups are already involved in ocean thermal energy conversion research and development activity; and

(7) consistent with the findings of the Domestic Policy Review on Solar Energy, ocean thermal energy conversion energy can potentially contribute at least one-tenth of quad of energy per year by the year 2000.

(b) Therefore, the purpose of this chapter is to accelerate ocean thermal energy conversion technology development to provide a technical base for meeting the following goals:

(1) demonstration by 1986 of at least one hundred megawatts of electrical capacity or energy product equivalent from ocean thermal energy conversion systems;

(2) demonstration by 1989 of at least five hundred megawatts of electrical capacity or energy product equivalent from ocean thermal energy conversion systems;

(3) achievement in the mid-1990's, for the gulf coast region of the continental United States and for islands in the United States, its possessions and its territories, an average cost of electricity or energy product equivalent produced by installed ocean thermal energy conversion systems that is competitive with conventional energy sources; and

(4) establish as a national goal ten thousand megawatts of electrical capacity or energy product equivalent from ocean thermal energy conversion systems by the year 1999.

(Pub. L. 96–310, §2, July 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 941.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 96–310, §1, July 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 941, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Research, Development, and Demonstration Act'."
### §102. Attendance of witnesses

Officers of district land offices designated by the Secretary of the Interior in all matters requiring a hearing before them are authorized and empowered to issue subpoenas directing the attendance of witnesses, which subpoenas may be served by any person by delivering a true copy thereof to such witness, and when served, witnesses shall be required to attend in obedience thereto: Provided, That if any subpoena be served under the provisions of this section by any person other than an officer authorized by the laws of the United States, or of the State or Territory in which the depositions are taken, the service thereof shall be proved by the affidavit of the person serving the same: Provided further, That said subpoenas shall be served within the county in which attendance is required, and at least five days before attendance is required.

(Jan. 31, 1903, ch. 344, §1, 32 Stat. 790; Oct. 28, 1921, ch. 114, §1, 42 Stat. 208; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1145; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The original text of this section referred to both registers and receivers, but reference to the latter was omitted in view of the abolition of such office under acts Oct. 28, 1921, and Mar. 3, 1925, which provided for the consolidation of the two offices under a register only. See, also, Transfer of Functions note below.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.

"Officers of district land offices designated by the Secretary of the Interior" substituted for "Registers of the land office, or either of them," on authority of section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946. See note set out under section 1 of this title.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

y0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141018

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141018 COA: 295921 Genesee CC: 08-023804-FC CHRISTOPHER DAVID COUSINO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 23, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §6731. Economization by State and local governments; statement of assurances, etc., required

Each State or unit of local government which receives payments under this subchapter shall provide assurances in writing to the Secretary, at such time and in such manner and form as the Secretary may prescribe by rule, that it has made substantial economies in its operations and that payments under this subchapter are necessary to maintain essential services without weakening Federal Government efforts to stimulate the economy through reductions in Federal tax obligations.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title II, §211, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 1009.)
#### In the Matter of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v Benjamin Tetteh, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 399]

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, Benjamin Tetteh appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered May 15, 2000, as declared that the petitioner’s maximum potential liability following arbitration under the subject policy is $50,000.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed, on the law, with costs, and the declaration is vacated.

The Supreme Court erred in considering the issue of the maximum liability of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter Liberty Mutual). “In effect [Liberty Mutual] inserted an application for a declaratory judgment into the proceeding for a stay of arbitration, without statutory authorization” *(Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Olsen,*222 AD2d 579, 580). Pursuant to CPLR 7503, a court may stay arbitration, *inter alia,*on the ground that a valid agreement to arbitrate was not made or has not been complied with, or that the claim is untimely. “The courts have no authority to grant a stay of *240arbitration on the ground that the damages sought under a policy are excessive” *(Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Olsen, supra,*at 581; *cf., Matter of General Acc. Ins. Co. v Brown,*263 AD2d 542; *Matter of Commerce & Indus. Ins. Co. v Weber,*240 AD2d 742; *Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Abbensett,*240 AD2d 578, [all upholding stays of arbitration on issue of excessiveness of damages only where no additional recovery would be possible, thus rendering arbitration academic]). Rather, the issues of the extent of the insurer’s liability and the availability of offsets are matters expressly within the language of the arbitration clause of the relevant Supplemental Uninsured Motorist endorsements, and thus must be determined at arbitration.

In light of our determination, we do not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
#### § 245.130 Tenants' rights not to be re-canvassed.

A tenant has the right not to be re-canvassed against his or her wishes regarding participation in a tenant organization.