alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rosemary E. Kleis, Respondent, and Andrew K. Kleis, Appellant-Respondent, v. New York Telephone Company, Respondent, and Catherine M. Flynn, Respondent-Appellant.

In a negligence action arising out of a three-car collision, to recover damages for injury to person and property, the plaintiff Andrew K. Kleis and the defendant Catherine M. Flynn cross-appeal as follows from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 23, 1960, made after a jury trial, which granted defendants’ motions to set aside, on the ground of excessiveness, the jury’s verdict of $11,200 for personal injuries in favor of said plaintiff against them; which directed a new trial as to said plaintiff and the defendants unless said plaintiff stipulated to reduce such verdict to $6,000; and which in effect denied the defendant Flynn’s further motion under section 457-a of the Civil Practice Act to direct judgment in her favor dismissing the complaint notwithstanding the verdict: (1) Plaintiff Andrew K. Kleis appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of said order as *941set aside tlie verdict in his favor and directed a new trial as to him unless he stipulated to reduce the verdict. (2) Defendant Flynn appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of said order as set aside the verdict and directed a new trial on the condition stated; as failed to set aside the verdict unconditionally; and as denied her motion to direct judgment in her favor dismissing the complaint notwithstanding the verdict. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.72 Zoning, deed and building restrictions.

The project when completed shall not violate any material zoning or deed restrictions applicable to the project site, and shall comply with all applicable building and other governmental codes, ordinances, regulations and requirements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAGEN
MACKENZIE'S  DEC. 31, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,233
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,760
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            321,135
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            2,751
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            150,167
<PP&E>                                           3,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 699,324
<SHORT-TERM>                                    63,650
<PAYABLES>                                     356,729
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             136,989
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   699,324
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                6,460
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             9,606
<COMMISSIONS>                                   10,765
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    1,869
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,028
<COMPENSATION>                                  12,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,312
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,165
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,165
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vertrue Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James B. Duffy,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/  James B. Duffy
----------------------------------
James B. Duffy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Vertrue Incorporated
May 10, 2005











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2932 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2932

 To amend the International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1979 
 to modify restrictions on the provisions of air transportation to and 
                        from Love Field, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2005

Mrs. Blackburn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the International Air Transportation Competition Act of 1979 
 to modify restrictions on the provisions of air transportation to and 
                        from Love Field, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFY CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS.

    Subsection (c) of section 29 of the International Air 
Transportation Competition Act of 1979 (Public Law 96-192; 94 Stat. 48 
et seq.) is amended by inserting ``Tennessee,'' before ``and Texas''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 17.6 Claims investigation. ( a ) When a claim has been filed with the Department, the head of the organizational unit concerned or his designee shall designate one employee in that unit who shall act as, and who shall be referred to herein as, the Claims Investigating Officer for that particular claim. When a claim is received by the head of an organizational unit to which this subpart applies, it shall be forwarded with or without comment to the designated Claims Investigating Officer, who shall: ( 1 ) Investigate as completely as is practicable the nature and circumstances of the occurrence causing the loss or damage of the claimant's property;
( 2 ) Ascertain the extent of loss or damage to the claimant's property;
( 3 ) Assemble the necessary forms with required data contained therein;
( 4 ) Prepare a brief statement setting forth the facts relative to the claim, a statement whether the claim satisfies the requirements of this subpart, and a recommendation as to the amount to be paid in settlement of the claim;
( 5 ) Submit such forms, statements, and all necessary supporting papers to the head of the organizational unit having jurisdiction over the employee involved, who will be responsible for assuring that all necessary data has been obtained for the file. The head of the organizational unit will transmit the entire file to the General Counsel.
Form of Notices of Exercise issued by certain warrant holders of the Registrant



  
 Exhibit 10.5

 NOTICE OF EXERCISE 
  

	To:	TUDOU HOLDINGS LIMITED (the “Company”) 

 The undersigned hereby elects to purchase Column A Series E Preferred Shares pursuant to the terms of the attached Warrant (the “Warrant”) immediately prior to the closing of the
IPO (as defined in the Warrant) of the Company. Payment of the Exercise Price (as defined in the Warrant) required under the Warrant accompanies this notice or herewith tenders payment by wire transfer to an account previously designated by the
Company. 
 The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that the undersigned is acquiring such shares for its own account for
investment purposes only, and not for resale or with a view to distribution of such shares or any part thereof. 
  

			
	 Column B

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Column C

	Name:	 	Column C
	Title:	 	Column D
	Address:	 	Column E









  
 Attachment: 

TUDOU HOLDINGS LIMITED 
 WARRANT TO PURCHASE SERIES E OR SERIES D PREFERRED SHARES 








											
	 	  	Column A	  	 Column B
	  	 Column C
	  	 Column D
	  	 Column E

	1	  	923,088	  	 GGV II Delaware L.L.C.
 By Granite Global Ventures II L.P.
 Its Member

By Granite Globla Ventures II L.L.C.,
 Its General Partner
	  	Hany Nada	  	Managing Director	  	2494 Sand Hill Road Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
						
	2	  	923,088	  	CRESCENT PEAK II LIMITED	  	David Hand	  	Director	  	c/o one Temasek Avenue Millenia Tower #20-01 Singapore 039192
						
	3	  	369,235	  	IDG Technology Venture Investment IV, L.P.	  	Hugo Shong	  	Authorized Signatory	  	N/A
						
	4	  	395,660	  	 GENERAL CATALYST GROUP IV, L.P.

 
 By: General Catalyst Partners IV, L.P.

its General Partner
  

By: General Catalyst GP IV, LLC
 its General Partner
	  	David J. Orfao	  	Managing Member	  	N/A
						
	5	  	10,497	  	 GC ENTREPRENEURS FUND IV, L.P.

 
 By: General Catalyst Partners IV, L.P.

its General Partner
  

By: General Catalyst GP IV, LLC
 its General Partner
	  	David J. Orfao	  	Managing Member	  	N/A
						
	6	  	6,461,617	  	 Sennett Investments
 (Mauritius) Pte Ltd.
	  	Juliet TEO JS	  	Authorized Signatory	  	60B Orchard Road #06-18 Tower 2 The Atrium@Orchard Singapore 238891 c/o IMM, Les Cascades Building Edith Cavell Street Port Louis, Mauritius
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,605
<SECURITIES>                                   210,888
<RECEIVABLES>                                  414,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,461
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               720,444
<PP&E>                                       1,411,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                 853,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,937,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          718,496
<BONDS>                                        149,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,314
<OTHER-SE>                                     650,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,937,390
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               644,906
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  449,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                109,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,896
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48


</TABLE>
#### § 241.11 Subrogation of USAID.

In the event of payment by USAID to a Noteholder under this Guarantee, USAID shall be subrogated to the extent of such payment to all of the rights of such Noteholder against the Borrower under the related Note.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.53 Initial operating funds. The mortgagor shall deposit cash with the mortgagee, or in a depository satisfactory to the mortgagee and under control of the mortgagee, in accordance with terms, conditions and standards established by the Commissioner for: ( a ) Accruals for taxes, ground rates, mortgage insurance premiums, and property insurance premiums, during the course of construction;
( b ) Meeting the cost of equipping and renting the project subsequent to its completion in whole or part; and
( c ) Allocation by the mortgagee for assessments required by the terms of the mortgage in an amount acceptable to the Commissioner.
Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 90 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 90 Filed 04/09/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:09-cv-01613-BZ Document 90 Filed 04/09/10 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACI Telecentrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Norbert F. Nicpon,
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.




Dated: /s/ August 14, 2003             By:  /s/   NORBERT F. NICPON
       -----------------------------        -----------------------------------
                                            Norbert F. Nicpon
                                            Principal Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer

                                       23
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Departmentof Energy annual procurement and financial assistance report [electronicresource].
 
2001| 2002
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.35/4:
Item Number:0429-A-26 (online)
CGP System Number:000608648
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 3, 2017********
### §6991l. Tanks on tribal lands

#### (a) Strategy

The Administrator, in coordination with Indian tribes, shall, not later than 1 year after August 8, 2005, develop and implement a strategy—

(1) giving priority to releases that present the greatest threat to human health or the environment, to take necessary corrective action in response to releases from leaking underground storage tanks located wholly within the boundaries of—

(A) an Indian reservation; or

(B) any other area under the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe; and

(2) to implement and enforce requirements concerning underground storage tanks located wholly within the boundaries of—

(A) an Indian reservation; or

(B) any other area under the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 2 years after August 8, 2005, the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report that summarizes the status of implementation and enforcement of this subchapter in areas located wholly within—

(1) the boundaries of Indian reservations; and

(2) any other areas under the jurisdiction of an Indian tribe.

The Administrator shall make the report under this subsection available to the public.

#### (c) Not a safe harbor

This section does not relieve any person from any obligation or requirement under this subchapter.

#### (d) State authority

Nothing in this section applies to any underground storage tank that is located in an area under the jurisdiction of a State, or that is subject to regulation by a State, as of August 8, 2005.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §9013, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title XV, §1529(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1101.)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

REQUEST

FOR CALCULATIONS 

FOR TRIAL

Both sides are invited to run calculations to ascertain how the fund would have done if the

25-percent non-guaranteed mortgaged-back securities limitation had been honored with the

excess over the 25 percent being: (a) kept in cash (Calculation One), and (b) distributed pro rata

among the other non-guaranteed mortgage-back securities investments (up to the limit of any

other industry limitation) (Calculation Two). These should then be pared down to those who

were shareholders as of the date of the mortgage-back securities industry limitation deletion. 

This should then be compared to the way it did turn out. This should be done in time for each

side to depose the experts on these calculations reasonably before trial. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02487-WHA Document 37 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 907.1 General. ( a ) In a case in which a hearing is not required under § 906.1 of this chapter, the Board may request in writing that specified documents or other evidence be furnished to it and/or may authorize the executive secretary to obtain such additional documents or other evidence as may be necessary to understand and decide the case.
( b ) Each party will be offered the opportunity to review and to supplement, by written submissions, the record of proceedings, prior to the date fixed by the Board for closing of the Record. The Board shall then consider the case and make a decision based on that Record. This may include the ordering of a hearing in accordance with part 906.
[50 FR 31357, Aug. 2, 1985]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley Hall, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 25, 1976, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. On appeal the defendant argues, *inter alia,*that he was denied his right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30. Although approxi*1051mately two and one-half years elapsed from the time of the first indictment (Dec., 1973) until the time of the trial (May, 1976), our review of the record shows that there has been no violation of the defendant’s right to a speedy trial. CPL 30.30 requires the prosecution to be ready for trial within six months of the filing of the indictment. However, the six-month time limit was not designed to be absolute and unyielding (cf. *People v Gordon,*47 AD2d 775) and the statute excludes certain periods from the time which is chargeable to the prosecution (CPL 30.30, subd 4). The bulk of the two and one-half-year delay resulted from adjournments which were requested or consented to by the defendant. Pursuant to CPL 30.30 (subd 4, par [b]), these periods are not chargeable to the prosecution. Another substantial source of delay was the preparation, filing and disposition of pretrial motions. These periods are excluded from the six-month time limit by CPL 30.30 (subd 4, par [a]). A third source of delay resulted from the failure or inability of the defendant or his counsel to appear. This time is excluded by CPL 30.30 (subd 4, pars [c], [d]). The only substantial period of time which is not directly attributable to the defendant is the period in which the prosecution was compelled to obtain a superseding indictment. This occurred because the stenographer who had taken the minutes of the Grand Jury proceedings had suffered a nervous breakdown and had transcribed unintelligible notes. As a result, the prosecution was unable to provide the Grand Jury minutes. While the ensuing delay was substantial, it is not chargeable to the prosecution by operation of CPL 30.30 (subd 4, par [g]), which excludes that delay which arises from "the exceptional circumstances of the case.” The nervous breakdown of the stenographer was not within the prosecutor’s control and constituted an exceptional circumstance, as envisioned by the statute. The total time chargeable to the prosecution is approximately five months, which is well within the statutory limit of CPL 30.30. The defendant’s other contentions have also been examined and we find that they lack merit. Titone, J. P., Rabin, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
§ 115.209 Technical assistance. ( a ) The Assistant Secretary, through the FHEO regional office, may provide technical assistance to the interim and certified agencies at any time. The agency may request such technical assistance or the FHEO regional office may determine the necessity for technical assistance and require the agency's cooperation and participation.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary, through FHEO headquarters or regional staff, will require that the agency participate in training conferences and seminars that will enhance the agency's ability to process complaints alleging discriminatory housing practices.