alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §300j–25. Drinking water fountain replacement for schools

#### (a) Establishment

Not later than 1 year after October 23, 2018, the Administrator shall establish a grant program to provide assistance to local educational agencies for the replacement of drinking water fountains manufactured prior to 1988.

#### (b) Use of funds

Funds awarded under the grant program—

(1) shall be used to pay the costs of replacement of drinking water fountains in schools; and

(2) may be used to pay the costs of monitoring and reporting of lead levels in the drinking water of schools of a local educational agency receiving such funds, as determined appropriate by the Administrator.

#### (c) Priority

In awarding funds under the grant program, the Administrator shall give priority to local educational agencies based on economic need.

#### (d) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2021.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIV, §1465, as added Pub. L. 115–270, title II, §2006(b)(1), Oct. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 3844.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 300j–25, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XIV, §1465, as added Pub. L. 100–572, §2(a), Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2887; amended Pub. L. 104–182, title V, §501(d), (f)(11), Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1691, 1692, related to Federal assistance for State programs regarding lead contamination in school drinking water, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 114–322, title II, §2107(b), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1728.
ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 









 


OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PACKAGE


 


Effective January 1, 2011, CompuCredit Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) will pay each outside director who is independent in accordance with the NASDAQ and SEC rules governing director independence (an “Eligible Director”) the following for service to the Company:


 



	
Annual Cash Retainer (paid quarterly)

	
$50,000


	
Attendance Fee for Each Board Meeting (including telephonic attendance)

	
   $2,500


	
Attendance Fee for Each Committee Meeting (including telephonic attendance)

	
   $1,000












In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $25,000 to be paid in quaterly installments.  The Chairman of each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 to be paid in quarterly installments.


 


Each Eligible Director also will receive an annual restricted stock award of 11,000 shares.  The restricted stock award will vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date.


 


The Company also will reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses that are incurred in connection with board and committee meetings.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.83 Interest rate. ( a ) The mortgage shall bear interest at the rate agreed upon by the mortgagee and the mortgagor.
( b ) Interest shall be payable in monthly installments on the principal amount of the mortgage outstanding on the due date of each installment.
( c ) The amount of any increase approved by the Commissioner in the mortgage amount between initial and final endorsement in excess of the amount that the Commissioner had committed to insure at initial endorsement shall bear interest at the rate agreed upon by the mortgagee and the mortgagor.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MemberWorks Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gary A. Johnson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gary A. Johnson
-------------------
Gary A. Johnson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
MemberWorks Incorporated
November 9, 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §8257. Interagency Energy Management Task Force

#### (a) In general

To assist the interagency committee organized under section 7266 of this title to coordinate the activities of the Federal Government in promoting energy conservation and the efficient use of energy and in informing non-Federal entities of the Federal experience in energy conservation, the Secretary shall establish an Interagency Energy Management Task Force (hereafter in this section referred to as the "Task Force").

#### (b) Members

The Task Force shall be composed of the chief energy managers of agencies represented on the interagency committee organized under section 7266 of this title.

#### (c) Duties

The Task Force shall meet when the Secretary requests, but not less often than twice a year, to—

(1) assess the progress of the various agencies in achieving energy savings;

(2) collect and disseminate information to agencies, States, local governments, and the public on effective survey techniques, innovative approaches to the efficient use of energy, incentive programs developed under section 8256 of this title, innovative contracting methods developed under subchapter VII of this chapter, the use of cogeneration facilities and renewable resources, and other technologies that promote the conservation and efficient use of energy;

(3) coordinate energy surveys conducted by the agencies;

(4) develop options for use in conserving energy;

(5) report to the committee organized under section 7266 of this title; and

(6) review, from time to time as may be necessary, the regulations relating to building temperature settings to determine whether changes in such regulations would be appropriate to assist in meeting the goals specified in section 8253 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title V, §547, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3279; Pub. L. 100–615, §2(a), Nov. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 3187.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–615 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to creation of an Interagency Energy Management Task Force for provisions relating to energy audits and retrofitting of existing Federal buildings.
Summary of Phone Conversation:

On September 13, 2013, I called Dan Inouye, Chief of the Monitoring and Planning Branch, 

Washoe County Health District, Air Quality Management Division to discuss the District’s interpretation 

of “National Ambient Air Standards” in NSR-related SIP Rule 030.010. Dan confirmed that the District 

interprets the reference to “National Ambient Air Standards” in SIP Rule 030.010 as a reference to the 

current National Ambient Air Quality Standards. He also confirmed that Table 5 (“National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS)”) which is found at the back of the District’s air pollution rules and 

regulations and which has not been updated since 1990, is intended for informational purposes only and 

is not intended to define the reference to the “National Ambient Air Standards” in SIP rule 030.010. I 

indicated that I believed that “Table 5” had not been incorporated into the Washoe County portion of 

the Nevada SIP.

Prepared by: Jeff Wehling, ORC, EPA Region IX

Date: September 13, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH A
LEGEND.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,594,910
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         468,798
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,320,010
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       6,079,209
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,116,368
<LOANS>                                    120,833,495
<ALLOWANCE>                                    155,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,099,248
<DEPOSITS>                                  76,544,307
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            810,112
<LONG-TERM>                                 30,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,476
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,724,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             133,099,248
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,488,222
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              434,541
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               115,293
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,038,056
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,702,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,855,048
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,183,008
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   27,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,648,285
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,709,137
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,121,378
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,121,378
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.35
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   187,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                706,826
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               133,493
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,862
<RECOVERIES>                                       250
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              155,881
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           140,881
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         15,000


</TABLE>
#### § 232.586 Minimum principal loan amount.

A mortgagee may not require, as a condition of providing a loan secured by a mortgage insured under this subpart, that the principal amount of the mortgage exceed a minimum amount established by the mortgagee.

[53 FR 8885, Mar. 18, 1988]
<PAGE>

                         EXHIBIT 31.2 CFO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2005

By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     ------------------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


                                       23
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DOCS\S5070-519\577750.V1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (No. 3:09-cv-01816 

B) 

LONG & LEVIT LLP

465 CALIFORNIA STREET 

SUITE 500 

SAN FRANCISCO 

CALIFORNIA 94104 

(415) 397-2222

JOSEPH P. MCMONIGLE, State Bar #66811

JESSICA R. MACGREGOR, State Bar #168777 

LONG & LEVIT LLP 

465 California Street, Suite 500 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 397-2222 

Facsimile: (415) 397-6392 

Email: jmcmonigle@longlevit.com 

 jmacgregor@longlevit.com 

Attorneys for Counter-Defendant 

ROBERT LASKOWSKI (erroneously sued as Robert 

Laskowsky) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC., a 

Nevada corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CAREY F. DALY II, an individual; and 

RANDALL J. LANHAM, an individual, 

Defendants. 

CASE No. 3:09-cv-01816 B 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER 

CAREY F. DALY II, an individual; and 

RANDALL J. LANHAM, an individual, 

Counter-Claimants, 

vs. 

ENCOMPASS HOLDINGS, INC., a 

Nevada corporation; J. SCOTT WEBBER, 

an individual and in his representative 

capacity; LARRY J. COOPER, an 

individual; KIRK HURFORD, an 

individual and in his representative 

capacity; SHIRLEY HARMON, an 

individual; DAREN BRINKMAN, an 

individual; JOSEPH BERARDI, an 

individual; and ROBERT LASKOWSKY, 

an individual, 

Counter-Defendants. 

Case 3:09-cv-01816-BZ Document 84 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DOCS\S5070-519\577750.V1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (No. 3:09-cv-01816 

B) 

LONG & LEVIT LLP

465 CALIFORNIA STREET 

SUITE 500 

SAN FRANCISCO 

CALIFORNIA 94104 

(415) 397-2222

On June 7, 20010, the Counter-Claimants agreed that Counter-Respondent Robert 

Laskowski may have an additional fourteen days to and including June 22, 2010 in which to 

respond to the counter-claims herein. The reason for the request for an extension includes Mr. 

Laskowski’s counsel’s travel out of the country in late May and early June. The extension will 

not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the court. 

Dated: June 8, 2010. LONG & LEVIT LLP 

By 

Jessica R. MacGregor 

Attorneys for Counter-Defendant 

ROBERT LASKOWSKI 

Dated: June 8, 2010. 

 /s/____________________________________ 

Christopher R. Miller 

Attorney for Defendants and Counter-Claimants 

CAREY F. DALY II and RANDALL J. 

LANHAM 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June ___, 2010. 

Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman 

8

Case 3:09-cv-01816-BZ Document 84 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 2
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN’S AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF 

A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 3590, 

THE “HALT TAX INCREASES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS AND SENIORS ACT” 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute modifies H.R. 3590 by 

modifying the effective date of the proposal. Under the amendment in the nature of a substitute, 

the proposal is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015. 

The following presents the estimated Federal fiscal year budget effects of the Chairman’s 

amendment. 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26

 

-1,570 -2,494 -2,756 -2,972 -3,205 -3,436 -3,687 -3,948 -4,216 -4,413 -12,998 -32,697 

NOTE: Details do not add to totals due to rounding. 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

June 14, 2016 

JCX-61-16
### §5679. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5679 was editorially reclassified as section 11189 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 304.6 Claims investigation. ( a ) When a claim has been filed with the Peace Corps, the General Counsel will send a copy of the claim to the head of the office concerned and ask him to designate one employee of that office who shall act as, and who shall be referred to herein as, the Claims Investigating Officer for that particular claim. The Claims Investigating Officer shall, with the advice of the General Counsel, where necessary: ( 1 ) Investigate as completely as is practicable the nature and circumstances of the occurrence causing the loss or damage of the claimant's property.
( 2 ) Ascertain the extent of loss or damage to the claimant's property.
( 3 ) Assemble the necessary forms with required data contained therein.
( 4 ) Prepare a brief statement setting forth the facts relative to the claim (in the case of motor vehicle accidents, facts should be recorded on Standard Form 91-A), a statement whether the claim satisfies the requirements of this subpart, and a recommendation as to the amount to be paid in settlement of the claim.
( 5 ) The head of the office concerned will be responsible for assuring that all necessary forms, statements, and all supporting papers have been procured for the file and will transmit the entire file to the General Counsel.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2926 

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 

1974 to require the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, in the case 

of airline pilots who are required by regulation to retire at age 60, 

to compute the actuarial value of monthly benefits in the form of a 

life annuity commencing at age 60. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. 

DEFAZIO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to require the Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation, in the case of airline pilots who are required 

by regulation to retire at age 60, to compute the actuarial value of monthly benefits in the form of a life 

annuity commencing at age 60. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pension Benefit Guar5 anty Corporation Pilots Equitable Treatment Act’’. 
2 

•HR 2926 IH 

1 SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR EMPLOYEES. 

2 (a) SINGLE-EMPLOYER PLAN BENEFITS GUARAN3 TEED.—Section 4022(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement 

4 Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1322(b)(3)) is 

5 amended, in the flush matter following subparagraph (B), 

6 by adding at the end the following: ‘‘If, at the time of 

7 termination of a plan under this title, regulations pre8 scribed by the Federal Aviation Administration require an 

9 individual to separate from service as a commercial airline 

10 pilot after attaining a specified age which is less than age 

11 65, the first sentence of this paragraph shall be applied 

12 to an individual who is a participant in the plan by reason 

13 of such service by substituting such age for age 65.’’. 

14 (b) AGGREGATE LIMIT ON BENEFITS GUARAN15 TEED.—Section 4022B(a) of such Act (29 U.S.C. 

16 1322b(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘If, as of such date, regulations prescribed by the Federal 

18 Aviation Administration require an individual to separate 

19 from service as a commercial airline pilot after attaining 

20 a specified age which is less than age 65, this subsection 

21 shall be applied to an individual who is a participant in 

22 any such plan by reason of such service by substituting 

23 such age for age 65.’’. 
3 

•HR 2926 IH 

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to ben3 efits payable on or after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Annual Report of Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A (the Report), the undersigned
officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, promulgated under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 11, 2010



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Dennis Pok Man Lui   
|Name:                     |  | Dennis Pok Man Lui     
|Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         
|/s/ Christopher John Foll
|Name:                     |  | Christopher John Foll  
|Title:                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Bradshaw *v.*Bradshaw.

October 15, 1912.

Temporary alimony. Before -Judge Maddox. Floyd superior court.- February 1, 1912.

*E. P. Kingsberry*and *Denny & Wright,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mundy & Mundy,*contra.

Beck, J.

Upon consideration of the pleadings and evidence contained in the record, it does not appear that the court below abused its discretion in rendering the judgment complained of, allowing temporary alimony and counsel fees to the petitioner.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*