FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T MAY 17, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 39 9 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 4 :0 9- cr-0 00 73 -RH-WCS-6 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us JUNIOR DOGUER, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e North ernDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Ma y 17 , 20 11 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, HU LL andKRAVITCH, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: App el la ntpl edgu il ty und er a p le a ag reem en t t o C ou nt s On e, Two , an d Eig htof ani ne -co un t i nd ic tm en t re tu rn edag ai ns t h im an d o th ers . Cou ntOnech arg edhi m with c on sp ira cy

to tra ffi c an d u se un au th or iz edacce ss de vi ces , in vi ol at io n o f 18 U.S.C. §§ 37 1, 1 02 9( b) (2 ) an d (c ); C ou ntTwo ch arg edfrau d i n co nn ect io n wi th co un te rfei t cr ed itcard s o r acc es s d ev ic es , invi ol at io n o f 18 U.S.C. §§ 10 29 (b )(2 ) an d (c ); C ou ntEig htch arg edag gr av at edid en ti ty the ft, i n vi ol at io n o f 18 U.S.C. § 1 02 8A. The di st ric t co urt s en te nc edap pe ll an t t o co nc urren t p ris on term s o f 60 m on th s o n C ou ntOne a nd97 m on th s o n C ou nt2 an d aco ns ecu ti ve pri so n t erm of 2 4 m on th s o n C ou ntEig ht . He no w app eal s h is se nt en ces . App el la ntarg ue s tha t the di st ric t co urt erredby im po si ng a two -le ve l en ha nc em en t o f hi s o ffen se lev el , pu rs uantto U.S.S.G. § 2 B1 .1(b )(1 0) , for“ (A) po ss es si on or u se of a ny (i) d ev ic e m ak in g e qu ip m en t” or “ (B) p ro du ct io n o r tra ffi ck in g o f an y

(i) un au th or iz edacce ss de vi ce o r co un te rfei t ac ces s d ev ic e” be cau se he was a ls o s ub

ject t o t he m an da to ry

24 m on th s co ns ecu ti ve sen te nc e o n Co un t Ei gh t. He rel ie s o n t he co m m en ta ry to U.S.S.G. § 2 B1 .6, wh ic h re st ric ts th e ap pl ic at io n o f “ sp eci fic off en se ch arac te ris ti cs forth e tr an sf er, p os se ss io n, o r us e of a m ean s o f id en ti fic at io n wh ende te rm in in g t he sen te nc e fo r th e und erl y in g of fen se .” U.S.S.G. § 2 B1 .6, co m m en t (n . 2).

“ W e rev ie w th e d is tri ctco urt's leg al in te rp ret at io ns of t he Sen te nc in g Gui de li ne s u nd er a de no vo st an da rdof r ev ie w andwe m us t ac cep t i ts factua l 2de te rm in at io ns un le ss th ey are cl earl y

erro ne ou s.” Uni te d Sta tes v. Za ldiv ar , 61 5 F.3 d 1 34 6, 1 35 0 (1 1t h C ir. 2 01 0) (ci ta ti on s o m it te d) , cer t. d en ie d , 13 1 S .Ct. 9 59 (2 01 1) . Becau se ap pe ll an t d idno t o bjec t t o t he di st ric t co urt’s ap pl ic at io n o f th e two -le ve l en hanc em en t und er § 2B 1.1 (b )(1 0) , we rev ie w th is is su e fo r pl ai n e rro r. Uni te d Sta tes v. Bo ni lla , 57 9 F .3d12 33 , 12 38 -3 9 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 9) (ap pl y in g p la in erro r rev ie w to sen te nc in g a rg um en ts rai se d fo r th e fi rs t t im e o n app eal ), cer t. de ni ed , 13 0 S .Ct. 2 36 1 (2 01 0) . To su ccee d o n t hi s p oi nt , app el la ntm us t s ho w (1) anerro r th at(2) is pl ai n, (3 ) affe ct s s ub st an ti al rig ht s, an d (4 ) se rio us ly affect s the fai rn es s, i nt eg rit y , or p ub li c rep ut at io n o f jud ic ia l p ro ceed in gs . Uni te d Sta tes v. Ola no , 50 7 U.S. 7 25 , 73 2, 1 13 S.Ct . 17 70 , 17 76 , 12 3 L.Ed .2d50 8 (1 99 3) . An erro r can no t b e d eem edpl ai n wh ere “ th ere i s n o p rece de ntfro m th e Supr em e Co urt o r th is Co urt d ire ct ly reso lv in g” a do ub tfu l que st io n o f st atut ory co ns tru ct io n. Uni te d Sta tes v. Le ja rde-Ra da , 31 9 F .3d12 88 , 12 91 (11 th Cir . 20 03 ). App el la ntcan no t es tabl is h t ha t the di st ric t co urt p la in ly erredinit s ap pl ic at io n o f th e two -le ve l en ha nc em en t. We hav e n oty etad dr es se d t he sco pe of th e co m m en ta ry to U.S.S.G. § 2 B1 .6 as ap pl ie d t o t he § 2 B1 .1(b )(1 0) sp eci fic of fen se ch arac te ris ti cs . The p res en te nc e in ve st ig at io n re po rt ( “ PSI” ) st at es th atth e § 2 B1 .1(b )(1 0) en ha nc em en t ap pl ie s u nd er (A)( i) f or“po ss es si on or u se of any 3de vi ce-m ak in g e qu ip m en t” be cau se th e “ of fen se in cl ud edanen co de r” an d u nd er (B)( i) fo r “pr oduc ti on or t raff ic ki ng of a ny (i) u nautho riz edacce ss de vi ce o r co un te rfei t ac ces s d ev ic e” b ecau se th e “ de bi t ca rd s i n t hi s ca se were p ro du ced with t he ex pr es s i nt en t t o d efraud .” The l im it at io n o n app li cat io n o f sp eci fic of fen se ch arac te ris ti cs inth e co m m en ta ry to § 2 B1 .6 ex te nd s o nl y

to “ tra ns fer, po ss es si on , or u se of am ean s o f id en ti fic at io n,” su chas acard , cod e, acc ou nt nu m be r, orPIN. U.S.S.G § 2 B1 .6, co m m en t (n . 2); 18 U.S.C. §§ 10 28 (d )(7 )(D), 10 29 (e)( 1) . The o ffen se co nduc t tha t trig ge redth e § 2B 1.1 (b )(1 0) en ha nc em en t i n th is cas e in vo lv edbo th th e u se of a n e nc od er t o p ro du ce co un te rfei t d eb itcard s an d t he pro du ct io n o f de bi t ca rd s, ra th er tha n m erel y th e “ tra ns fer, p os se ss io n, o r us e” o f th os e d eb itcard s. Thus , th e p la inlan gu ag e o f th e rel ev an t g ui de li ne s, co m m en ta ry , andrefe ren cedst atut es supp ort the di st ric t co urt’s ap pl ic at io n o f § 2 B1 .1(b )(1 0) inth is cas e. App el la nt ’s con te nt io n t ha t the factua l b as is for hi s p le a ag reem en t d oe s n ot supp ort the en ha nc em en t i s wh ol ly w itho utm eri t. He n ev er o bjec te d t o the factua l ba si s fo r th e en hanc em en t, i .e., us e o f anen co de r an d p ro du ct io n o f de bi t card s, an d h e wit hd rew h is ob

jecti on to hi s d es ig na ti on as a“ ha nd le r,” wh ic h the PSI de sc rib edas i nc lu di ng th e act iv ity of “ reen co di ng card s.” Se e W ade , 45 8 F .3dat 12 77 (“ fai lu re t o o bjec t t o a ll eg at io ns of f actina PSI ad mit s tho se fact s fo r 4se nt en ci ng pu rp os es ”). Altho ug h t he off en se co nduc t al so in vo lv ed“ tra ns fer, po ss es si on or u se ” o f co un te rfei t d eb itcard s, the di st ric t co urt d idno t re ly on thi s co nduc t fo r ap pl ic at io n o f th e § 2B 1.1 (b )(1 0) two -le ve l i nc reas e. AFFIRMED.

5