alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ohana Estimating Service’s exemption request furthers the public interest. National 

policy set by Congress favors early integration of UAS into the national airspace in 

controlled, safe working environments such as those propose in this petition. In addition, 

maintaining worksite safety has been a priority of state and local governments for 

decades. 

Conducting aerial videography with the sUAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly 

benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated 

during traditional aerial video production flight operations. By using battery power and 

electric motors, the sUAS produces no air pollution, and is the most viable 

environmentally conscious alternative to piston or turbine powered rotorcraft. The sUAS, 

while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial video productions, also eliminates noise 

pollution as its battery-powered electric motors are barely audible during the takeoff 

phase, and cannot be heard when operating more than 100 feet above ground level. 

By using the sUAS to perform aerial videography, the substantial risk to life and property 

in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft 

flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the 

lack of aircrew members located onboard the aircraft, the minimal size and weight of a 

sUAS creates less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the 

ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct aerial 

videography. 

In addition, granting the exception will help advance the knowledge base for conducting 

commercial UAS operations. This additional data will help the FAA set future rules 

regarding UAS flight operations, maintenance, and crew qualifications. The public also 

has an interest in reducing the hazards and emissions associated with alternate use of 

helicopters to conduct similar aerial videography operations. The UAS in question is very 

light weight and does not carry any flammable fuel, further reducing the risk from any 

potential accident.
§ 97.5 Certification of Hague Convention Compliance in an incoming convention case where final adoption occurs in the United States. ( a ) Once the Convention has entered into force for the United States, any person may request the Secretary to certify that a Convention adoption in an incoming case finalized in the United States was done in accordance with the Convention.
( b ) Persons seeking such a certification must submit the following documentation: ( 1 ) A copy of the certificate issued by a consular officer pursuant to 22 CFR 42.24(j) certifying that the granting of custody of the child has occurred in compliance with the Convention;
( 2 ) An official copy of the adoption court's order granting the final adoption; and
( 3 ) Such additional documentation and information as the Secretary may request at the Secretary's discretion.
( c ) If a person seeking the certification described in paragraph (a) of this section fails to submit all the documentation and information required pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section within 120 days of the Secretary's request, the Department may consider the request abandoned.
( d ) The Secretary may issue the certification if the Secretary, in the Secretary's discretion, is satisfied that the adoption was made in compliance with the Convention. The Secretary may decline to issue a certification, including to a party to the adoption, in the Secretary's discretion. A certification will not be issued to a non-party requestor unless the requestor demonstrates that the certification is needed to obtain a legal benefit or for purposes of a legal proceeding, as determined by the Secretary in the Secretary's discretion.
( e ) A State court's final adoption decree, when based upon the certificate issued by a consular officer pursuant to 22 CFR 42.24(j), certifying that the grant of custody of the child has occurred in compliance with the Convention, or upon its determination that the requirements of Article 17 of the Convention have been met constitutes the certification of the adoption under Article 23 of the Convention.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AIK CHEONG NEO, an individual d/b/a PO

LO KU TRADING, and KAI CHANG HO,

an individual,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

MARINA BROTHERS, INC., a California

corporation d/b/a MARINA FOOD #5, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00739 WHA

No. C 10-00455 SC

ORDER DECLINING 

TO RELATE CASES

The undersigned has reviewed the administrative motion to relate case number 

C 10-00455 SC to case number C 09-00739 WHA. While the parties in the case pending before

Judge Conti were both defendants in the action pending before the undersigned, they have long

since been dismissed from case number C 09-00739. Moreover, while the same allegedly

infringing products may be at issue in both cases, the case before the undersigned is a trademark

infringement action brought by the owner of the mark, while case number C 10-00455 involves a

dispute solely between downstream buyers and sellers of the allegedly infringing product. As

such, these cases are not related under Civil Local Rule 8-1(a). 

Dated: February 4, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00739-WHA Document 149 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES V. RODRIGUEZ, CR No. 09-750 MMC,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN STRETCH (CSBN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

DENISE MARIE BARTON (MABN 634052)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7359

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

denise.barton@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSE RAMON RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No. 09-00750 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE

Hearing Date: March 10, 2010

Hearing Time: 2:30 p.m. 

Proposed Hearing Date: March 24, 2010

Proposed Hearing Time: 2:30 p.m. 

This matter is currently scheduled for a Further Status Conference / Change of Plea

before this Court on Wednesday, March 10, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. By this stipulation, the parties

seek to continue this Further Status Conference / Change of Plea until Wednesday, March 24,

2010 at 2:30 p.m.

Since the last appearance, the parties engaged in meaningful discussions regarding

resolution of this matter. However, a few issues have arisen this week that require further factual

investigation. The parties request this continuance to permit further investigation of these issues

which will allow a final determination whether a resolution can be reached.

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 3:09-cr-00750-MMC Document 20 Filed 03/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES V. RODRIGUEZ, CR No. 09-750 MMC,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

For these reasons, the parties jointly seek a continuance until March 24, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. 

The parties agree that time is properly excluded under the Speedy Trial Act for effective

preparation of counsel. 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

DATED: March 4, 2010 ____/s/_________________________

DENISE MARIE BARTON

MATTHEW L. MCCARTHY

Assistant United States Attorneys

DATED: March 4, 2010 ____/s/___________________________

MARK GOLDROSEN

Attorney for JOSE RAMON RODRIGUEZ

For the foregoing reasons, this matter is continued until March 24, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. for a

Further Status Conference / Change of Plea. Pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18 United

States Code, sections 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), the ends of justice are served by

granting the requested continuance, given that failure to do so would deny the parties reasonable

time for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Accordingly,

time shall be excluded from March 10, 2010 through March 24, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________________ ________________________________

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Court Judge

March 4, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-00750-MMC Document 20 Filed 03/04/10 Page 2 of 2
### §§7450 to 7459. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–549, title VI, §601, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2648

Section 7450, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §150, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 725, set forth Congressional declaration of purpose.

Section 7451, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §151, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 726, set forth Congressional findings.

Section 7452, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §152, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 726, set forth definitions applicable to this part.

Section 7453, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §153, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 726, related to studies by Environmental Protection Agency.

Section 7454, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §154, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 728; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695, related to research and monitoring activities by Federal agencies.

Section 7455, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §155, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 729, related to reports on progress of regulation.

Section 7456, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §156, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 729, authorized President to enter into international agreements to foster cooperative research.

Section 7457, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §157, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 729, related to promulgation of regulations.

Section 7458, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §158, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 730, set forth other provisions of law that would be unaffected by this part.

Section 7459, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §159, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §126, 91 Stat. 730, related to authority of States to protect the stratosphere.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

For provisions relating to stratospheric ozone protection, see section 7671 et seq. of this title.
§ 203.390 Waiver of title—mortgages or property formerly held by the Secretary. ( a ) *Mortgages sold by the Secretary.* ( 1 ) If the Secretary sells a mortgage and such mortgage is later reassigned to him or the property covered by such mortgage is later conveyed to him, he will not object to title by reason of any lien or other adverse interest that was senior to the mortgage on the date of the original sale of such mortgage.
( 2 ) The Secretary will accept an assignment of a mortgage previously sold by him, where the mortgagee is unable to complete foreclosure because of a defect in the mortgage instrument, a defect in the mortgage transaction, or a defect in title which existed at or prior to the time the mortgage assignment was filed for record. In such instances, the Secretary will not object to title by reason of any such defect.
( b ) *Property sold by the Secretary.* ( 1 ) If a property held by the Secretary is sold by the Secretary who also insures a mortgage financing the sale, and the mortgage is later reassigned to the Secretary or the property covered by the mortgage is later conveyed to the Secretary, the Secretary will not object to title by reason of any lien or other adverse interest that was senior to the mortgage on the date the mortgage was filed for record, except where the lien or other adverse interest arose from a lien or interest that had already been recorded against the mortgagor.
( 2 ) The Secretary will accept an assignment of a mortgage executed in connection with the sale of property by the Secretary, where the mortgagee is unable to complete foreclosure because of a defect in the mortgage instrument, a defect in the mortgage transaction, or a defect in title which existed at or prior to the time the mortgage was filed for record, except where the defect arose from a lien or interest that had already been recorded against the mortgagor on the date that the mortgage was filed for record. Except for the case of a lien or interest that had already been recorded against the mortgagor, the Secretary will not object to title by reason of any of the above defects.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 58 FR 35370, July 1, 1993; 61 FR 36265, July 9, 1996]
#### § 9a.1 Security of certain information and material related to the International Energy Program.

These regulations implement Executive Order 11932 dated August 4, 1976 (41 FR 32691, August 5, 1976) entitled “Classification of Certain Information and Material Obtained from Advisory Bodies Created to Implement the International Energy Program.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,538
<INVENTORY>                                     13,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,953
<PP&E>                                          45,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          110,164
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,257
<SALES>                                        191,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               191,418
<CGS>                                          178,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  201,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,994)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Hutchison
Telecommunications International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2008 (the Report), the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
promulgated under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 27, 2009



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Dennis Pok Man Lui   
|Name:                     |  | Dennis Pok Man Lui     
|Title:                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                         
|/s/ Christopher John Foll
|Name:                     |  | Christopher John Foll  
|Title:                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\5634\Order re March 12 hearing.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIRTRANSPORTATION ANTITRUSTLITIGATION                                                                      /

This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS                                                                      /

No. C 07-05634 CRB

MDL 1913

ORDER

The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a

determination of the applicability of the Bankruptcy Court’s injunction to these proceedings. 

The merits of those motions will therefore not be the subject of the hearing scheduled for

March 12, 2010.  Instead, the parties should be prepared to discuss the merits of Defendants’

Motion To Stay Proceedings Upon Notice of Injunction in In Re: Japan Airlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01462-CRB   Document 10   Filed 03/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-09T11:07:30-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
### §9165. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–320, title IV, §405, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 98–623, title VI, §602(c), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3411, which required the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to submit an annual report on the administration of this chapter to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, the 8th item on page 54 of House Document No. 103–7.
§ 220.765 Special insurance benefits—forbearance relief cases. ( a ) Upon a failure of the mortgagor to meet the requirements of a forbearance agreement or to cure the default under the mortgage at the expiration of the forbearance period, the mortgagee shall be entitled to obtain a special insurance payment in cash, in lieu of the insurance benefits otherwise provided under this subpart. To receive the special insurance payment, the mortgagee shall assign the mortgage to the Commissioner in compliance with the requirements of § 207.258(b) of this chapter.
( b ) The special insurance benefits to the mortgagee shall be a cash payment computed in accordance with § 207.259(b) of this chapter, except that in lieu of the allowance for debenture interest in § 207.259(b)(1)(iii) of this chapter, the payment shall include the amount of the unpaid accrued mortgage interest computed to the date the assignment of the mortgage to the Commissioner is filed for record. In addition, there shall be included in the cash payment an amount equivalent to the debenture interest which would have been earned from the date the mortgage assignment was filed for record to the date the payment is made; except that when the mortgagee fails to meet any of the applicable requirements of § 207.258(b) of this chapter and § 220.753(c) within the specified times and in a manner satisfactory to the Commissioner (or within such further time as the Commissioner may approve in writing), such debenture interest allowance shall be computed only to the date on which the particular required action should have been taken.
CERTIFICATION
 
 The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) of the Select Notes
        Trust LT 2004-1 (the “Trust”) hereby makes the following certifications for inclusion as an exhibit to the Trust’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Annual Report”):
 
 1.  The Trustee is the trustee under the Trust’s trust agreement.
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, for the period covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under the Trust’s trust agreement.
 
 
 By:
          /s/ William H HallName:
          William H HallTitle:
          Vice PresidentDated:
          March 18, 2019
Order entered October 1 9 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00738

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S .V., S.V., AND S.V., CHILDREN
On Appeal from the 469th Judicial Dist rict Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469

- 56356

- 2016



### O RDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. By order dated August 10, 2018, the Court granted the parties’ motion to abate the appeal to allow the trial court to sign an amended decree of divorce p ursuant to their agreement. On October 10, 2018, the Court received a supplemental clerk’s record containing the Amended Final Decree of Divorce. In light of this filing, appellant shall file, by October 29, 2018, either a motion to dismiss the appeal or a letter explaining why we should not dismiss the appeal as

moot. We caution appellant that f ailure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without
further notice. See Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’ n v. Jones , 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999) (case
b ecomes moot and court loses jurisdiction if controversy between parties ceases to exist) ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a).

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE