alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER Case No: 3:09-cv-00602-SI 

Chad S. Campbell, CA Bar No. 258723

CSCampbell@perkinscoie.com 

Timothy J. Franks, CA Bar No. 197645 

TFranks@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000 

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788 

Telephone: 602.351.8000 

Facsimile: 602.648.7000 

Nancy Cheng (CA Bar No. 280682) 

NCheng@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP 

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

Telephone: 650.838.4300 

Facsimile: 650.838.4350 

Attorneys for Intel Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

NORTHPEAK WIRELESS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v.

3COM CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:09-cv-00602 SI 

UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PERMISSION 

TO USE EQUIPMENT DURING 

TUTORIAL

Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston 

Courtroom 10, 19th Floor

Intel Corporation respectfully requests the Court’s permission for Defendants to use the 

following presentation equipment during the tutorial for the above-captioned action, which is 

scheduled to take place on Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 10:00 a.m: (1) laptop computers; (2) 

display projector; (3) projector screen; (4) A/V cart, stand and table; (5) cabling and related 

accessories. The equipment will also be available for use by all parties. Plaintiff NorthPeak 

Wireless, LLC has indicated that it does not oppose this request. 

Case 3:09-cv-00602-SI Document 582 Filed 08/18/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNOPPOSED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER -2- Case No: 3:09-cv-00602-SI 

DATED: August 17, 2015 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: /s/ Chad S. Campbell 

Chad S. Campbell, (#258723) 

Timothy J. Franks, (#197645) 

Aaron H. Matz (pro hac vice)

Tyler R. Bowen, (pro hac vice)

2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000 

Phoenix, AZ 85012-2788 

Telephone: 602.351.8000 

Facsimile: 602.648.7000 

cscampbell@perkinscoie.com 

tfranks@perkinscoie.com

amatz@perkinscoie.com 

tbowen@perkinscoie.com

Nancy Cheng (#280682) 

PERKINS COIE LLP

3150 Porter Drive 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 

NCheng@perkinscoie.com

Attorneys for Intel Corporation 

ORDER

The following audio/visual equipment may be brought to Courtroom 10 on August 19, 

2015 for the tutorial on that day: (1) laptop computers; (2) display projector; (3) projector screen; 

(4) A/V cart, stand and table; (5) cabling and related accessories.

IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: August ____, 2015. 

 

Honorable Susan Illston 

U.S. District Court Judge 

18

Case 3:09-cv-00602-SI Document 582 Filed 08/18/15 Page 2 of 2
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER 

LLC fka FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BRAYTON◊PURCELL LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

222 RUSH LANDING ROAD

P O BOX 6169

NOVATO, CALIFORNIA 94948-6169

(415) 898-1555

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDRA LEONARD, as Successor-in- Interest to and as Wrongful Death Heir 

of JOHN R. LEONARD, Deceased; and 

JOHN JOSEPH LEONARD, as Wrongful 

Death Heir of JOHN R. LEONARD, 

Deceased,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

FOSTER WHEELER LLC (FKA FOSTER 

WHEELER CORPORATION),

Defendants.

Case No. 3:12-cv-03853-CRB

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 

DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER 

LLC fka FOSTER WHELER 

CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All claims against 

Defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC fka FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION are hereby 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Dated: May 2, 2016 By:__________________________________ Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00708-CRB Document 39 Filed 05/04/16 Page 1 of 1
### SUBCHAPTER XLI—BAKER PROJECT, OREGON
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 10, 2019

No. 04-18-00623-CR

Matthew SERNA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-05-0186-CRA

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due on August 9, 2019.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2841

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage, 

as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of home needle destruction devices and the disposal of needles and lancets through a 

sharps-by-mail or similar program under part D of the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005

Mr. FERGUSON (for himself, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. RYAN

of Ohio, and Mr. ISSA) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for coverage, as supplies associated with the injection 

of insulin, of home needle destruction devices and the 

disposal of needles and lancets through a sharps-by-mail 

or similar program under part D of the Medicare Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 2841 IH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Safe Needle 

3 Disposal Coverage Act of 2005’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF HOME NEEDLE DESTRUCTION DE5 VICES AND DISPOSAL OF NEEDLES AND 

6 LANCETS THROUGH A SHARPS-BY-MAIL OR 

7 SIMILAR PROGRAM UNDER MEDICARE PART 

8 D. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–2(e)(1)(B) of the 

10 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)(1)(B)) is 

11 amended by inserting after ‘‘regulations of the Secretary’’ 

12 the following: ‘‘and including devices approved for home 

13 use by the Food and Drug Administration for the safe 

14 and effective destruction of needles and the disposal of 

15 needles and lancets through a sharps-by-mail or similar 

16 program as medically appropriate based on volume of 

17 usage’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2007.

Æ
#### § 232.897 Actions to be taken by lender.

With respect to any action required of the lender within a period of time prescribed by this subpart, the Commissioner may extend such period.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MATTHEW LANE DRENNEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-95-27-5)

Submitted: May 26, 2004 Decided: June 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Lane Drennen, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Lane Drennen appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Drennen, No. CR-95-27-5

(N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2003); see also United States v. Capers, 61

F.3d 1100, 1109 (4th Cir. 1992). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,268
<SECURITIES>                                    15,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,419)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,196
<PP&E>                                         345,410<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 887,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           14,676
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (92,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   887,043
<SALES>                                         82,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,059
<CGS>                                           26,327<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (994)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,735)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>PP&E IS SHOWN NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION.
<F2>INCLUDES PROGRAM FEES AND OTHER DIRECT EXPENSES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
| Exhibit 99.4 **COMM Series 2004-LNB3****Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to****Certificateholders****for January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004****Ending Principal****Class****Principal****Interest****Balance**R-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 R-2 0.00 0.00 0.00 LR 0.00 0.00 0.00 A-1 4,465,866.85 854,057.92 43,426,133.15 A-1A 949,968.04 6,945,782.69 263,532,031.96 A-2 0.00 2,286,488.40 97,029,000.00 A-3 0.00 2,662,222.68 104,606,000.00 A-4 0.00 3,008,398.50 114,956,000.00 A-5 0.00 13,483,334.03 502,796,000.00 B 0.00 1,074,357.80 40,063,000.00 C 0.00 447,624.50 16,692,000.00 D 0.00 761,004.57 28,378,000.00 E 0.00 671,463.58 25,039,000.00 F 0.00 402,867.42 15,023,000.00 G 0.00 358,110.33 13,354,000.00 H 0.00 313,353.24 11,685,000.00 J 0.00 313,353.24 11,685,000.00 K 0.00 179,055.17 6,677,000.00 L 0.00 89,541.00 3,339,000.00 M 0.00 134,298.08 5,008,000.00 N 0.00 134,271.26 5,007,000.00 O 0.00 134,298.08 5,008,000.00 P 0.00 446,704.46 16,693,283.00 R 0.00 0.00 0.00 X 0.00 1,166,840.80 1,329,996,448.87 LR 0.00 0.00 0.00 Q 0.00 0.00 0.00 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACI Telecentrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q /A for the quarter ended June, 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Rick N. Diamond, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.




Dated:  /s/ May 29, 2003               By:  /s/ RICK N. DIAMOND
        --------------------                -----------------------------------
                                            Rick N. Diamond
                                            Chief Executive Officer




                                       22
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Global Matrechs,
Inc. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned President, Chief Executive Officer, and acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certifies, to his best knowledge and belief, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                       /s/ Michael Sheppard
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Name: Michael Sheppard
                                       Title: President, CEO and acting CFO
                                       Date: May 26, 2005
#### § 92.21 Notarial certificate to oath or affirmation.

The written statement attesting to the administration of an oath or affirmation is known as a jurat. The jurat must be signed and sealed by the notarizing officer (see §§ 92.15 and 92.16 on signing and sealing notarial certificates).
### §7917. Financial assistance

#### (a) Federal and non-Federal funds; administrative costs

In the case of any designated processing site for which an agreement is executed with any State for remedial action at such site, the Secretary shall pay 90 per centum of the actual cost of such remedial action, including the actual costs of acquiring such site (and any interest therein) or any disposition site (and any interest therein) pursuant to section 7913 of this title, and the State shall pay the remainder of such costs from non-Federal funds. The Secretary shall not pay the administrative costs incurred by any State to develop, prepare, and carry out any cooperative agreement executed with such State under this subchapter, except the proportionate share of the administrative costs associated with the acquisition of lands and interests therein acquired by the State pursuant to this subchapter.

#### (b) Indian land processing sites

In the case of any designated processing site located on Indian lands, the Secretary shall pay the entire cost of such remedial action.

(Pub. L. 95–604, title I, §107, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3029.)
### SUBCHAPTER XVIII—CIBOLO PROJECT, TEXAS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PETER CHAN, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR 09-0824 MMC

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY

ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Having considered the application for a preliminary order of forfeiture filed by the United

States and the defendant’s plea of guilty on April 7, 2010, wherein the defendant admitted to the

forfeiture allegation, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following property is forfeited to the United States:

1. $41,707.00 in United States Currency which was seized from the residence located at

309 Cordova Street, San Francisco, CA;

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States, through its appropriate agency, shall

seize the forfeited property forthwith and publish on www.forfeiture.gov, a government website 

for at least thirty days, notice of this Order, notice of the government’s intent to dispose of the 

property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct and provide notice that any person,

Case 3:09-cr-00824-MMC Document 56 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

other than the defendant, having or claiming a legal interest in the property must file a petition

with the Court and serve a copy on government counsel within thirty (30) days of the final

publication of notice or of receipt of actual notice, whichever is earlier.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 32.2(c)(1)(B), of the Federal

Criminal Rules of Procedure, that the United States may take discovery as to any third party

claim which is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Criminal

Rules of Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at

the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of 2010.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE 2

CR 09-0824 MMC

11th June

Case 3:09-cr-00824-MMC Document 56 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Henry Young, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on September 28, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Silverman, J. P., Fein, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
PD-1396-14COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALSAUSTIN, TEXASTransmitted 8/10/2015 4:10:47 PMAccepted 8/11/2015 8:16:04 AMABEL ACOSTACLERK
Evaporation and Drift 

Wabash 

River 

Chlorine

Hot Spot CoolingPower Block andGasification Block

CondensateFlow

NOx Steam 

Condensate Boiler Feedwater MS to CT

Flow to Gasifier CR

Boiler Feedwater Condensate Flow HR

Return Flow From Gasifier

Precipitation Evaporation

Steam FromGasifier Block

Non-recoverable

Losses

To / From T295 S262 Service Water

Tanks (note 7) (note 5) Hot Spot Cooling Filter

Cleaning Slurry from

S176 Quench / T144 T102 / T106

ASU Blow Down RCC Distillate (note 4) C195 Precipitation (note 6) (note 6)

PlantRunoff

 Evaporation Trench

SolidsWeir See Note 3Plate

Sour Water System

To C240 column V

Caustic

Outfall 001 

Wabash

River

To / From 

S260 Sump

(note 7)

Nitrogen to

Power Block

Air

Recycle Slurry

Water

HP Steam to Hot Boiler

Power Block Feedwater Sour Distillate 

Water 

Oxygen 

Losses

MILLING, 

HEATING & 

FEEDING 

Petcoke

Coal 

Cool Sour 

Service Syngas 

Water 

Makeup 

S262 

(note 5) Sweet 

Syngas 

Quench Slag 

Water Slurry

S176 Slurry 

(note 4)

Slag Product

(Off Site) 

COPYRIGHT © 2009 BY BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

Claricone

(Filtration)

Gravity

Filter

Petcoke / Coal

Storage

Area

Condenser

HRSG

Steam

Turbine

Wastewater

Holding

Pond

Storm Water / 

Polishing

Pond

K

A

C

P

H

12

T140

Slag Dewater 

Hoppers

S260 Sump

S105 Sump

D

I J

13

N

X Y Z S T U V W

R

Q

AB

34

30

AA

GASIFICATION

SLAG 

HANDLING

T102 - 

SLURRY 

STORAGE

T140 

BUILDING

HIGH TEMP 

HEAT 

RECOVERY

ACID GAS 

REMOVAL

CHAR 

REMOVAL LTHRU

SULFUR 

RECOVERY 

UNIT

5

1

20

2

4

AIR 

SEPARATION

UNIT

12

6

21

C270 -

DEGASSING

COLUMN

13

11 14

10

9

8

22

7

15

18

19

3

C271 -

NH3 

REMOVAL

COLUMN

C

CO

RCC 

EVAPORATOR

CO

T295A-F

STORAGE 

TANKS

T106 -

HEAVY 

SOLIDS

23

24

25

26

30 31

35 Z

Demineralizer 

System

Demineralizer

Storage Tank

Condensate 

Holding Tank

Condensate 

Polisher

M

AF

AD

AE

AG

AC

AH

COS 

HYDROLYSIS

MOI

16 ZA

S

T

Clearwell

Carbon

Filter

River 

Circulating 

Water

HP Industrial

Water

LP Industrial

B Water

E

G

Cooling

Tower O

L

F
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Global
Matrechs, Inc. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned President, Chief Executive Officer, and acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certifies, to his best knowledge and belief, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



                                               /s/ Michael Sheppard
                                                   -----------------------------
                                            Name:  Michael Sheppard
                                            Title: President, CEO and acting CFO
                                            Date:  September 3, 2004