p. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1413 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 63 ) 11-1-6 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/9/20083:11:23 PM

Sheet 63 of 114P. 2 

# /. - 9V- S i X--T-6 3 AI RPOLLUTIO

NCONTRO L OPERATIONPERMI T
E I FACILITYNO . 24127081 0 PERMI T NO . 241270810-P0 1

TYPE : Operatio nPermit , Major , Par t 7 0 Sourc e I ncomplianc e wit hth e provision s o f Chapte r 144 , Wis . Stats. , and Chapter s N R40 0 t o N

R499 , Wis . Adm . Code , Name o f Source : Stree t Address : BRADYU.S.A . - Signmark RDivisio n Camero nAvenu e Facilit y 332 8 W . Camero nAvenu e Milwauke e Milwauke e Count y Responsibl e Official , & Title : To mJ . Felme r Genera l Manage r i s authorize d t o operat e fiberglas s signmanufacturing facilit yi nconformit y wit hth e condition s herein , an d i ncomplianc e wit hth e provision s o f Chapte r 285 , Wis . Stats , (formerl ych . 144 , Wis . Stats.) , and Chapter s NR40 0 t o N R499 , Wis . Adm . Code , THI S OPERATIO

N PERMI T EXPIRE S MARCH12 . 2002 . ARENEWA L APPLICATIONMUS T B E SUBMITTE D AT LEAS T 1 2 MONTHS , BUT NO T MOR E THA N1 8 MONTHS , PRIORT O THI S EXPIRATIONDAT E [s . NR407.09(1)(b)1 , Wis . Adm . Code] . N o permitte e ma ycontinu e operatio no f a sourc e afte r the operatio npermi t expires , unles s th e permitte e submit s a timel yan d complet e applicatio nfo r renewa l o f th e permi t [s . 285.66(3) , Wis . Stats , (formerl ys . 144.396(3) , Wis . Stats.) , and NR407.04(2) , Wis . Adm . Code] . Thi s authorizatio nrequire s complianc e b ythe permi t holde r wit hth e emissio n limitations , monitoring requirement s an d othe r term s an

d condition s se t fort h i nPart s I and I I hereof . Date d a t Milwaukee , Wisconsin , Marc h12 . 199 7 Stat e o f Wisconsi n Departmen t o f Natura l Resource s Fo r the Secretary

ByDanie l Schramm/s / 03/12/9 7 Danie l Schramm , P.E . Superviso r Ai r Managemen t Engineering Sectio n Southeas t Regiona l Headquarter s

Marc h10 , 199 7 Pag e 1P. 3

PT-oawih l a AnAsteris k "* " throughou t thi s documen t denote s lega l authority , limitation s and condition s whic har e no t federall yenforceable . Thi s permi t supersede s ai r pollutio ncontro l permi t #92-DAA-29 6 Activ e Constructio nPermit s Expiratio nDat e

Non e No t Applicabl e Stac k and Proces s Index StackSIO , Proces s P3 0 Aproces s lin e t o coa t an d cur e fiberglas s coated wit ha styrene-base d resin . StackS14 , Proces s P3 3 Th e miscellaneou s finishing operation s performe d t o machin e th e cure d fiberglas s composit e int o th e finishe d produc t (industria l signs) . StackS30 , Proces s P3 5 Amanua l scree nprinting pres s an d air-drie d drying racks . Thi s sourc e i s no t subjec t t o an yNe wSourc e Performanc e Standard s (NSPS) . Permi t Shiel d - Unles s preclude d b yth e Administrato r o f th e USEPA , complianc e wit hal l emissio nlimitation s i nthi s operationpermi t i s considere d t o b e complianc e wit hal l emissio nlimitation s established unde r ss . 285.0 1 t o 285.87 , Wis . Stats , (formerl yss . 144.3 0 t o 144.426 , Wis . Stats.) , an d emissio n limitation s unde r the federa l cleanai r act , tha t ar e applicabl e t o th e sourc e i f the permi t include s th e applicabl e limitatio no r i f th e Departmen t determine s tha t th e emissio nlimitation s d o no t apply . Th e following emissio nlimitation s wer e reviewe d i nth e analysi s and preliminary determinatio nan

d wer e determine d no t t o appl yt o thi s stationarysource : s . NR422.145 , Wis . Adm . Coda - Unde r N R422.0 3 (4m ) (b) , Wis . Adm . Code , scree n printin g facilitie s locate d i nMilwauke e Countywit ha Maximu mTheoretica l Emission s o f VOC s fro mal l scree nprinting unit s a t the facilit yo f les s tha n 2 5 tpyar e exemp t (Proces s P35) . s . N R424.03(2) , Wis . Adm . Cod a - Unde r N

R424.03(1)4 , Wis . Adm . Code , proces s line s fromwhic hvolatil e organi c compound emission s ar e neve r greate r tha n1 5 pound s pe r dayar e exemp t (Proces s P35) . Par t I —Th e heading s fo r th e area s i nthe permi t ar e define d below . Th e lega l authorit yfo r thes e limitation s o r method s follow s themi n[brackets ] . Pollutant —Thi s are a wil l not e whic hpollutan t i s being regulate d byth e permit .

January16 , 199 7 Page 2



# aP. 4

Limitations—Thi s are a wil l lis t al l applicabl e emissio nlimitation s tha t appl yt o th e source , including case-by-cas e limitation s suc ha s Lates t Availabl e Contro l Technique s (LACT) , Bes t Availabl e Contro l Technology (BACT) , o r Lowes t Achievabl e Emissio nRat e (LAER) . I t wil l als o lis t an y voluntaryrestriction s o nhour s o f operation , rawmateria l use , o r productio n rat e requeste d b yth e permitte e t o limi t potentia l t o emit . Compliance Demonstration —Th e complianc e demonstratio nmethod s outline d i nthi s are a mayb e use d t o demonstrat e complianc e wit hth e associate d emissio nlimi t o r wor k practic e standard liste d unde r the correspondin g Limitationsarea . Th e complianc e demonstratio nare a contain s limit s o n parameter s o r othe r mechanism s tha t wil l b e monitore d periodicall yt o ensur e complianc e wit hthe limitations . Th e requiremen t t o tes t a s wel l a s initia l and periodi c tes t schedules , i f testing i s required , wil l b e state d here . Reference Test

Methods. Recordkeeping, and Monitoring Requirements— Specifi c EP AReferenc e tes t method s o r othe r approve d tes t method s wil l b e containe d i nthi s are a an d ar e the method s tha t mus t b e use d wheneve r testing i s required . Areferenc e tes t metho d wil l b e liste d eve ni f n o testing i s immediatel yrequired . Als o include d i nthi s are a ar e an y recordkeeping requirement s an d thei r frequencyan d reporting requirements . Accurac yo f monitoring equipmen t shal l meet , a t a minimum , th e requirement s o f ss . NR439.055(3 ) an d (4) , Wis . Adm . Code , a s specifie d i nPar t I I o f thi s permit . ConditionType —

Thi s are a wil l specif yothe r condition s tha t ar e applicabl e t o th e entir e facilitytha t mayno t b e tie d t o on e specifi c pollutant . Conditions—Specifi c condition s usuall yapplicabl e t o th e entir e facilit y o r complianc e requirements . Compliance Demonstration« Thi s are a contain s monitoring and testin g requirement s and method s t o demonstrat e complianc e wit hth e conditions . PART II —Thi s sectio ncontain s th e genera l limitation s tha t th e permitte e mus t abid e by . Thes e requirement s ar e standar d fo r mos t source s o f ai r pollutant s s o the yar e include d i nthi s sectio nwit heverypermit .

January16 , 199 7 Pag e 3



# PaP. 5

PAR T I APPLICABL E LIMITATION S AN D SPECIFI C CONDITION S Stac k SIO , Proces s P3 0 - Acusto mdesigne d proces s lin e t o flo wcoat an d temperatur e cur e a fiberglas s we bcoate d wit ha styrene-base d resin . Th e cure d composit e i s use d a s th e bas e substrat e i n th e manufacturin g o f industria l signs . Th e proces s lin e wa s installed , o r las t modified , i nMarc ho f 1978 . Stac k SI O represent s th e composit e o f thre e fixe d exhaus t stacks . Volatil e Organi c Compoun d (VOC ) Emission s a . LIMITATION S

(1 ) Th e permitte e ma ynot cause , allow, o r permi t VO C emission s int o th e ambien t ai r whic hexcee d 1.3 5 pound s pe r gallo no f resi ndelivere d t o th e applicator , excludin g water , [s . N R 419.03 , Wis . Adm . Code] . (2 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f al l resins , a s delivere d t o th e applicator , ma ynot excee d 12,00 0 gallons , excludin g water , average d ove r th e thre e mos t recen t consecutiv e calenda r months , [s . 285.65(7) , Wis . Stats , (formerl ys . 144.394(7) , Wis . Stats.) ] (3 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f VO C ma yno t excee d 33 0 pound s fro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s t o clea n equipment , [s . 285.65(7) , Wis . Stats , (formerl ys . 144.394(7) , Wis . Stats.) ] b . COMPLIANC E DEMONSTRATIO N

(1 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , prio r t o it s application , eithe r analyticall yo r throug hth e us e o f publishe d literatur e (e.g. , MSDS) , th e pound s o f VO C pe r gallon , excludin g water , emitte d durin g th e applicatio n an d cur e o f eac hresi nan d o f eac hequipmen t cleanu p solven t used . [s . N R407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ] (2 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , o n monthl ybasis , th e tota l volum e o f al l resin s delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hmont h i nunit s o f gallons , excludin g water . ts . N R 407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ] (3 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , o n monthl ybasis , th e tota l weigh t o f VOC s use d eac hmont hfro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s t o clea n equipment , i n unit s o f pounds . [s . N R 407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ] C . REFERENC E TES T METHODS , RECORDKEEPIN GAN D MONITORIN GREQUIREMENT S

(1 ) Wheneve r VO C conten t complianc e testin g o f th e cleanu p solvent s i s required , USEP AMetho d 2 4 o r Metho d 24 Ashal l b e used . [s . N R439.06(3)(b) , Wis . Adm . Code ]

Januar y16 , 199 7 Pag e 4

*- /P. 6

(2 ) Th e permitte e shal l maintai n monthl yrecords , o r a database , o f th e followin g information : (a ) Auniqu e nam e o r identificatio n o f eac hresin , a s delivere d t o th e applicator , an d eac hcleanu p solvent , a s use d t o clea n equipment ; (b ) Th e pound s o f VO C pe r gallon , excludin g water , emitte d durin g th e applicatio n an d cur e o f eac hresi n an d th e pound s o f VO C pe r gallon , excludin g water , o f eac h equipmen t cleanu p solvent used . Th e permitte e shal l determine , prio r t o it s use , eithe r analyticall yo r throug hpublishe d literatur e (e.g. , MSDS) , th e VO C emissio n o f eac hresi n delivere d t o th e applicato r an d th e VO C conten t o f eac hequipmen t cleanu p solven t used ; (c ) Th e tota l volum e o f al l resin s delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hmont hi n unit s o f gallons , excludin g water ; (d ) Th e tota l volum e o f al l resin s delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hmont hi n unit s o f gallons , excludin g water , average d ove r th e mos t recen t thre e consecutiv e calenda r months ; an d (e ) Th e tota l weigh t o f al l VOC s use d eac hmont hfro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s t o clea n equipment , i nunit s o f pounds . Record s mus t b e maintaine d suc htha t th e individua l usag e an d cumulativ e usag e o f al l resin s delivere d t o th e applicato r an d al l VOC s use d fro mth e usag e o f equipmen t cleanu p solvent s ca n b e readil yan d accuratel ydetermine d o n a monthl ybasis . Th e record s shal l b e compile d b yth e fifteent h(15th ) da yo f th e followin g month . [ss . N R 407.09(1 ) (c)lb , N R439.04(1)(d ) an d N R439.04(4)(a) , (b) , an d (c) , Wis . Adm . Code ]

Januar y16 , 199 7 Pag e 5



# sP. 7

Stac k S14 , Proces s P33 , Contro l Devic e C3 3 - Th e miscellaneou s finishin g operation s performe d t o machin e th e cure d fiberglas s composit e int o th e finishe d produc t (e.g. , 1 corne r router , 1 shapin g router , 1 single

spindl e dril l press , 2 multi-spindl e dril l presses , an d 2 bel t sanders) . Th e proces s equipment wa s installed , o r las t modified , i n Augus t o f 19 7 9 . Stac k S1 4 i s a fixe d exhaus t stack . Particulat e emission s ar e controlle d b ya Tori t fabri c filte r dus t collector . Th e collectio n efficienc yo f th e exhaus t syste mi s 7 0 percent , whil e th e contro l efficienc yo f th e contro l devic e i s 99. 9 percent . Particulat e Matte r (PM ) Emission s a . LIMITATION S

(1 ) Th e emissio n o f particulat e matte r ma ynot excee d 3.4 0 pound s pe r hour . [ss . N R415.05(1)(o ) an d N R415.05(2) , Wis . Adm . Code ] Th e allowabl e emissio n o f P Mi s calculate d b yth e us e o f equatio nE = 3.5 9 P 0 * 6 2 fo r proces s weight rate s u p t o 60,00 0 pound s pe r hour . E i s th e allowabl e emissio n i n unit s o f pound s pe r hou r an d P i s th e proces s weigh t rat e expresse d i nunit s o f ton s pe r hour . (2 ) Th e permitte e shal l operat e a particulat e contro l devic e wheneve r an yo f th e equipmen t describe d b yproces s P3 3 (e.g. , 1 corne r router , 1 surfac e router , 1 single-spindl e dril l press , 2 multi-spindl e dril l presses , an d 2 bel t sanders ) i s used . [s . 285.65(7) , Wis . Stats , (formerl ys . 144.394(7) , Wis . Stats.) ] b . COMPLIANC E DEMONSTRATIO N Th e permitte e shal l monito r th e pressur e dro p acros s th e particulat e collectio n devic e (i.e. , Tori t Downfl o Mode l 2DF1 2 Unit ) a t a minimu mo f onc e ever yeigh t (8 ) hour s o f operatio no r onc e pe r day , whicheve r yield s th e greate r numbe r o f measurements , [s . 407.09(4)(a)3b. , Wis . Adm . Code ] C . REFERENC E TES T METHODS , RECORDKEEPIN GAN D MONITORIN GREQUIREMENT S

(1 ) Wheneve r PM.complianc e emissio n testin g i s required , Metho d 5 (includin g backhalf ) o r Metho d 1 7 i n 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , Appendi xA , o r Metho d 20 2 i n 4 0 CF Rpart 51 , Appendi xM , shal l b e used . [s.N R439.06(1) , Wis . Adm . Code ] (2 ) Th e permitte e shal l maintai n dail yrecords , o r a database , o f th e pressur e dro p measurement s acros s th e particulat e collectio ndevic e (i.e. , Tori t Downfl o Mode l 2DF1 2 Unit) . Al l measurement s shal l b e recorde d i n unit s o f inche s o f water . Measurement s shal l b e made , a t a minimum , onc e ever y eigh t (8 ) hour s o f operatio n o r onc e pe r day , whicheve r yield s th e greate r numbe r o f measurements . [ss . NR 407.09(1)(c)l ban d N R439.055(1)(a) , an d N R439.055(2)(b)1 , Wis . Adm . Code ]

Januar y16 , 199 7 Pag e 6

/ /P. 8

Visibl e Emission s a . LIMITATION S Particulat e matte r emission s ma yno t excee d 2 0 percen t opacit yo r numbe r 1 o f th e Ringleman n chart , [s . N

R431.04(2) , Wis . Adm . Code ] b . COMPLIANC E DEMONSTRATIO N Se e th e complianc e demonstratio nsectio nfo r particulat e matte r i n Sectio nB.l.b . i nPar t I o f thi s permit . c . REFERENC E TES T METHODS , RECORDKEEPIN GAND MONITORIN

GREQUIREMENT S (1 ) Wheneve r visibl e emissio ntesting i s required , Metho d 9 i n 4 0 CF Rpar t 60 , Appendi xA , shal l b e used . [s . N R 439.055(9)(a)l , Wis . Adm . Code ] (2) ' Se e th e recordkeeping and monitoring requirement s i nSectio n i B.l.c(2 ) i nPar t I o f thi s permit .

January16 , 1997 i Pag e 7



# •nP. 9

Stac k S30 , Proces s P3 5 - Amanua l scree n printin g pres s an d air-drie d dryin g rack s use d t o produc e custo mgraphics . Th e proces s lin e wa s installed , o r las t modified , i n Novembe r o f 1992 . Stac k S3 0 represent s th e dummystack . Ai r emission s ar e release d a s indoo r fugitives . Volatil e Organi c Compoun d (VOC ) Emission s a . LIMITATION S

(1 ) Th e permitte e ma yno t cause , allow, o r permi t organi c compoun d emission s int o th e ambien t ai r whic hsubstantiall y contribut e t o th e exceedin g o f a n ai r standar d o r caus e ai r pollution , [s . N R419.03 , Wis . Adm . Code] . (2 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f al l inks , coatings , thinnin g solvents , an d retardin g agent s delivere d t o th e applicato r ma ynot excee d 3. 0 gallons , excludin g water , [s . 285.65(7) , Wis . Stats , (formerl ys . 144.394(7) , Wis . Stats.) ] (3 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f VO C ma yno t excee d 21. 0 pound s fro m th e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s t o clea n equipmen t an d screens , [s . 285.65(7) , Wis . Stats , (formerl ys . 144.394(7) , Wis . Stats.) ] b . COMPLIANC E DEMONSTRATIO N

(1 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , prio r t o it s application , eithe r analyticall yo r throug hth e us e o f publishe d literatur e (e.g. , MSDS) , th e pound s o f VO C pe r gallon , excludin g water , an d densit y(i f needed ) o f eac hink , coating , thinnin g solvent , retardin g agent , an d cleanu p solven t used . [s . N R407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ] (2 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , o n dail ybasis , th e tota l volum e o r weigh t o f eac hink , coating , thinnin g solvent , an d retardin g agen t delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hda yan d eac hequipmen t an d scree n cleanu p solven t use d eac hday , i n unit s o f gallon s (excludin g water) , pounds , o r grams . I f a weight measuremen t i s use d t o recor d usage , th e densit yo f th e materia l mus t b e recorde d i n unit s sufficien t t o conver t th e weigh t measuremen t int o unit s o f gallons , excludin g water . [s . N R407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ] (3 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , o n monthl ybasis , th e tota l volum e 6 f al l inks', ' coa t ings" , thinning " solvent s , an d retardin g agent s delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hmonth , i n unit s o f gallons , excludin g water . [s . N R407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ] (4 ) Th e permitte e shal l determine , o n monthl ybasis , th e tota l weigh t o f al l VOC s use d eac hmont hfro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s use d t o clea n equipmen t an d screens , i n unit s o f pounds . [s . N R407.09(4)(a)3b , Wis . Adm . Code ]

Januar y16 , 199 7 Pag e 8P.1 0

c . REFERENC E TES T METHODS , RECORDKEEPIN GAN D MONITORIN GREQUIREMENT S

(1 ) Wheneve r VO C conten t o r densit ycomplianc e testin g i s required , USEP AMetho d 2 4 o r Metho d 24 Ashal l b e used . [s . N R439.06(3)(b) , Wis . Adm . Code ] (2 ) Th e permitte e shal l maintai n dail yrecords , o r a database , o f th e followin g information : (a ) Auniqu e nam e o r identificatio n o f eac hink , coating , thinnin g solvent , retardin g agent , an d cleanu p solven t used ; (b ) Th e VO C content o f eac hink , coating , thinnin g solven t an d retardin g agen t delivere d t o th e applicator , an d eac hcleanu p solven t use d t o clea n equipmen t an d screens , i n unit s o f pound s o f pe r gallon , excludin g water . Th e permitte e shal l determine , prio r t o it s use , eithe r analyticall yo r throug hpublishe d literatur e (e.g. , MSDS) , th e VO C conten t o f eac h materia l used ; an d (c ) Th e tota l volum e o r weigh t o f eac hink , coating , thinnin g solvent , an d retardin g agent delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hda yan d eac hequipmen t an d scree n cleanu p solven t use d eac hday , i n unit s o f gallon s (excludin g water) , pounds , o r grams . I f a weigh t measuremen t i s use d t o recor d usage , th e densit yo f th e materia l mus t b e recorde d i n unit s sufficien t t o conver t th e weigh t measuremen t int o unit s o f gallons , excludin g water . [ss . N R407.09(1 ) (c)lb , N R439.04(1 ) (d) , an d N R439.04(4 ) (a) , (b) , an d (c) , Wis . Adm . Code ] Th e permitte e shal l maintai n monthl yrecords , o r a database , o f th e followin g information : (a ) Auniqu e nam e o r identificatio n o f eac hink , coating , thinnin g solvent , retardin g agent , an d cleanu p solven t used ; (b ) Th e tota l volum e o f al l inks , coatings , thinnin g solvents , an d retardin g agent s delivere d t o th e applicato r eac hmont hi n unit s o f gallons , excludin g water ; an d (3 )

(c ) Th e tota l weigh t o f VO C use d eac hmont hfro mth e usag e

o f al l cleanu p solvent s t o clea n equipmen t an d screens , i n unit s o f pounds . Record s must b e maintaine d suc htha t th e individua l usag e an d cumulativ e usag e o f al l inks , coatings , thinnin g solvents , an d retardin g agent s delivere d t o th e applicato r an d al l VOC s use d fro mth e usag e o f equipmen t an d scree n cleanu p solvent s ca n b e readil yan d accuratel ydetermine d o n a monthl ybasis . Th e record s shal l b e compile d b yth e fifteent h(15th ) da yo f th e followin g month . [ss . N R 407.09(1)(c)l ban d NR439.04(1)(d) , Wis . Adm . Code ] Januar y16 , 199 7 Pag e 9 

# QP.1 1

D . OTHE RCONDITION S APPLICABL E T O TH E ENTIR E FACILIT Y 1 . Monitorin g Report s (a ) Th e permitte e shal l submi t th e result s o f monitorin g o r a summar y o f monitorin g result s require d b ythi s permi t t o th e Departmen t ever y6 months . (b ) Th e tim e period s t o b e addresse d b yth e submittal s ar e Januar y1 t o Jun e 3 0 an d Jul y1 t o Decembe r 31 . (c ) Th e repor t shal l b e submitte d t o th e Distric t o r Are a Offic e withi n4 5 day s afte r th e en d o f eac hreportin g period . (d ) Al l deviation s fro man d violation s o f applicabl e requirement s shal l b e clearl yidentifie d i n th e submittal . (e ) Eac hsubmitta l shal l b e certifie d b ya responsibl e officia l a s t o th e truth , accurac yan d completenes s o f th e report . [s . N R439.03(1)(b) , Wis . Adm . Code ] 2 . Complianc e Certificatio n (a ) Th e permitte e shal l submi t annua l certificatio n o f complianc e wit hth e requirement s o f thi s permi t t o th e Wisconsi n Departmen t o f Natura l Resources , Southeas t Region , 230 0 N . Dr . M L Kin g Jr . Drive , P.O . Bo x12436 , Milwaukee , W I 53212 , phon e (414 ) 263-850 0 an d t o Complianc e Dat a - Wisconsin , Ai r an d Radiatio n Division , USEPA , 7 7 W . Jackson , Chicago , I L 60604 . (b ) Th e tim e perio d t o b e addresse d b yth e repor t i s Januar y1 t o Decembe r 31 . (c ) Th e repor t shal l b e submitte d t o th e Ai r Managemen t Section , Wisconsi nDepartmen t o f Natura l Resources , Southeas t Region , 230 0 N . Dr . M L Kin g Jr . Drive , P.O . Bo x12436 , Milwaukee , W I 5321 2 an d U.S . EP Awithi n4 5 day s afte r th e en d o f eac hreportin g period . (d ) Th e informatio ninclude d i n th e repor t shal l compl ywit hth e requirement s o f Par t I I Sectio n No f thi s permit . (e ) Eac hrepor t shal l b e certifie d b ya responsibl e officia l a s t o th e truth , accurac yan d completenes s o f th e report . [s . N R439.03(1)(c) , Wis . Adm . Code ]

Januar y16 , 199 7 Pag e 1 0 

# If)P.1 2

Inspectio n Repor t TA Z 06/26/9 6 Pag e 1/ 2 BRAD YUSA FI D #24127081 0 Camero nAvenu e Facilit y 332 8 W . Camero nAvenu e Milwaukee , W I Attendants : To mZelinsk i -DN R

Janee n Jackso n- Brad y ? - Plan t Manage r O nth e mornin g o f Jun e 26 , a meeting wa s hel d wit hBrad yU.S.A . t o discus s th e statu s o f thei r Titl e V permi t and t o conduc t a brie f wal k throughtou r o f thei r facility . Ashor t meeting wa s hel d prio r t o th e tour . Th e firs t itemdiscusse d wa s th e purpos e o f the inspection . I t wa s explaine d tha t th e inten t o f th e tou r i s limited . I wante d t o revie wthe lis t o f insignifican t unit s describe d i nth e application , t o loo k a t th e particulat e collectio ndevice , an d t o briefl ytou r th e thre e significan t emissio nunit s (P30 , Fibe r glas s coating ; P33 , Finishin g operations ; and P35 , Scree nPrinting) . During th e meeting , copie s o f the P D (06/19 ) an d Draf t Permi t (06/25 ) wer e give n t o Janee nfo r he r review . I t wa s explaine d tha t thes e document s wer e generate d base d upo nth e informatio nsubmitte d wit hthe permi t application . I aske d he r t o revie wthes e document s and t o le t m e kno wo f an yerror s o r change s needed . W e briefl yreviewe d eac hdocument . Whil e reviewing th e PD , I focuse d o nth e insignifican t units . Th e 36-gallo n soak tan k i s use d t o cleancoating part s from th e fiberglas s coating line . Dibasi c Este r i s th e cleaning solvent . A nMSD S wa s provided . I t i s estimate d tha t th e maximu musag e o f solven t i s approximatel y 100 0 pound s pe r year . Th e shop onl yoperate s 25 0 day s pe r year . Base d upo nthi s number , an

d the fac t on e cleanu p pe r da

yi s onl yrequire d whethe r o r no t th e uni t operate s on e o r 2 4 hours , th e MT E o f Dibasi c Este r i s estimate d a t 146 0 pound s pe r yea r [100 0 gal/yr X(36 5 dy/yr / 25 0 dy/yr)] . Th e uni t i s insignificant . Althoug hinsignificant , th e uni t maystil l b e subjec t t o the rule s fo r col d cleaning i nChapte r N R423 . I t wa s als o mentione d tha t some solvent , presentl y Acetone , i s use d a t th e facilit yt o periodicall yt o spo t cleanequipment . Th e cleanu p solvent , i s store d i ncontainer s tha t preven t evaporation . Th e container s ar e store d i nsolven t storag e cabnits . Solven t (e.g. , Acetone ) i s receive d i n 55-gallo n drum s and dispense d fro mthe dru

mint o smalle r containers . A t th e facilit yi s als o a 6000-gallo n underground styren e resi nstorag e tank . Th e existing tan

k i s soo nt o b e replace d wit hanabove ground tan k o f simila r size . VO C emissio nestimate s fromthes e tank s wer e don e bythe source . Usin g tank calculation s th e sourc e estimate d th e maximu memissio no f styren e fromth e ol d and ne wtank s a t 118 5 lbs/yr an d 142 7 lbs/yr , respectively . Th e resi nstorag e tan k i s a insignifican t emissio nsource . Anothe r uni t presen t a t th e facility , bu t no t mentione d i nthe application , ar e the mechanica l shear s use d t o cu t th e cure d fiberglas s substrate . Little , i f any , PMemission s ar e generate d durin g th e cutting process . N o VOC s ar e emitted . Afte r discussing th e insignifican t unit s i nthe PD , w e briefl yreviewe d th e condition s and complianc e demonstratio nrequirement s i nth e draf t permi t (06/1 9 version) . A t thi s time , i t wa s explaine d the allowabl e VO C emission s fromth e

/ /P.1 3

remov e pilo t resi nline , o r 13 0 pound s pe r month , wa s bein g transferre d t o th e Inspectio nRepor t TA Z 06/26/9 6 Pag e 2/ 2 BRAD YUS AFID # 24127081 0 allowabl e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s fo r the fiberglas s coating line . I t wa s als o mentione d tha t cleanu p usag e limit s wer e being change d fromgallon s o f solven t use d t o pound s o f VO C used . Thi s i s being don e t o allo wth e sourc e mor e flexibility . The ypresentl yus e acetone , a non-VOC , a s a cleanu p solvent . A n itemo f contentio nwa s the emissio nlimi t use d fo r the styren e coating line . Th e sourc e feel s th e emissionresul t obtaine d b ythe weigh t los s tes t overstate s th e tru e VO C emissions . I t wa s mentione d tha t AP-42' s emissio nfactor s ar e muc h lower . I explaine d I a msuppos e t o us e actua l testing dat a ove r AP-4 2 emissio n factors , an d tha t the emissio nlimi t o f 1.3 5 i s a carryove r limitatio nfroma previou s permit . Existing permi t condition s canno t b e change d unles s mor e informatio n i s availabl e an d the limitatio ni s nolonge r applicable . I mentione d t o th e sourc e theyalwa yhav e th e optio nt o repea t the study , i f the ybeliev e th e result s overstat e thei r tru e emissions . Janee nwil l furthe r revie wth e draf t permi t provide d and le t m e kno wi f ther e ar e an yproblems . Sh e als o mentione d tha t th e electri c curin g ove nha s bee nreplaced wit ha 1. 2 mmBTU/h r natura l ga s fire d oven . Th e ove n blowe r ha s als o changed . Sh e wil l provid e m e wit hth e change s i na letter . Include d i nth e lette r wil l b e thei r acceptanc e t o th e change s I mentione d i nthei r permi t conditions . Afte r ou r meetin g a brie f tou r o f th e facilit ywa s made . Everything appeare d i n order . Th e particulat e collectiondevic e ha s a gaug e whic hmeasure s th e pressur e drop . Th e scree nprinting pres s wa s no t being used . Al l ink and solven t container s wer e seale d o r store d i ncontainer s tha t preven t evaporation . Th e fiberglas s coating lin e wa s operating . The proces s i s ver ymuc hlik e i t wa s describe d i nth e application . Th e graphic s ar e printe d o npape r sheet s and encapsulate d int o the fiberglas s composit e befor e th e cure . Th e cure d shee t i s manuall ycu t int o sheet s and place d o ncarts . The finishing operation s use s spo t ventilatio n t o collec t the P Memissions . Th e facilit yi s basicall yi ngoo d order . Fugitiv e sytren e i s veryapparen t i nthe plan t air .



### TAZ



# 12P. M

ANALYSIS . PRELIMINAR YDETERMINATIO

NAND DRAF T PERMI T fo r BRADYU.S.A . - Camero nAvenu e Facility

Locate d a t 332 8 W . Camero nAvenu e Milwauke e Milwauke e County , Wisconsi n o nthe operatio no f Fiberglas s SignProductio nFacilit y Thi s revie wwa s performe d b ythe Wisconsi nDepartmen t o f Natura l Resource s in accordanc e wit hSection s 144.39 1 t o 144.394 , Wis . Stats. , an d Chapte r NR407 , Wis . Adm . Code . Thi s reviewi s fo r a majo r Part-7 0 sourc e locate d i na n are a whic hi s designate d nonattainmen t fo r Ozon e an d attainment/unclassifie d fo r al l othe r criteri a pollutants . Ai r PollutionContro l Operatio nPermi t 24127081O-P0 1 Analysis , Preliminar y Determinatio

n an dDraf t Permi t preparedby : Thoma s Zelinski/s / Dat e Augus t 27 . 199 6 Approva l Elemen t 'Preliminary Determination Document (including calculations) 'Applicable Requirements 'Compliance Demonstration Methods (compliance inspectorconcurrence) *Compliance Planand Schedule ^Federal Enforceabilityof Permit Conditions (forsyntheti c mino

r conditions) Initial s and

Dat e DHS /s/ 09/12/96

DHS /s/ 09/12/96 GAV /s/ 09/06/96 N/A TAZ /s/ 08/27/96 N?A TAZ Ys/ 08/27/96

Approvedfor Publi c Revie w an dComment : Danie l Schram m/s / Data : 09/12/9 6 cc : AM/7-0 P Milwauke e Publi c Library 81 4 W . Wisconsi nAvenu e Milwaukee , W I 5323 3

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 1 

# ISP.1 5

INTRODUCTIO

N Source s whic har e no t exemp t fromthe operationpermi t requirement s unde r Sectio nNR407.03 , Wis . Adm . Code , ar e require d t o obtai na nai r pollutio n contro l operatio npermit . Source s subjec t t o the requirement s mus t submi t a permi t applicatio nt o the Departmen t o f Natura l Resource s b yth e dat e se t fort hi nSection s 144.374(2)(a) , Wis . Stats. , an d N R407.04 , Wis . Adm . Code . Th e applicatio ni s the nreviewe d following the provision s se t fort hi n Section s 144.3925 , 144.393 , an d 144.3935 , Wis . Stats. , and Chapte r NR407 , Wis . Adm . Code . Subjec t source s ar e t o b e reviewe d fo r thei r ai r pollutio ncontro l technology and fo r thei r impac t uponthe ai r quality . Thi s i s t o insur e complianc e wit h al l applicabl e rule s an d statutoryrequirements . Th e revie wwil l sho wwh yth e source' s operatio nshoul d b e approved , conditionall yapproved , o r disapproved . I t wil l encompas s emissio ncalculation s an d ai r qualit yanalysi s using U.S . EP Amodels , i f applicable . Emission s fro mvolatil e organi c compound (VOC ) source s and smal l source s whos e emission s ar e know nt o b e insignifican t ar e normall yno t modeled . A s a precautionarynote , th e emissio nestimate s ma yb e base d o nU.S . -EP

Aemissio nfactor s (AP-42 ) o r theoretica l dat a and canvary fro mactua l stac k tes t data . Thi s revie wi s base d oninformatio ncontaine d withi nth e applicatio nsubmitte d fo r a nai r pollutio ncontro l operatio npermit . A noperatio npermi t ma yb e issue d following th e criteri a se t forthi nSection s 144.39 3 and 144.3935 , Wis . Stats. , ar e met . Afina l decisio no nthe operatio npermi t wil l no t b e mad e unti l th e publi c ha s had a nopportunit yt o commen t o nth e Department' s analysis , preliminary determinatio nan

d draf t permit . Th e condition s propose d i nth e draf t permi t mayb e revise d i nan yfina l permi t issue d base d o ncomment s receive d o r furthe r evaluatio nb ythe Department . Owner/Operator : W . H . Brad yCompan

y 655 5 W . Goo d Hop e Road Milwaukee , W I 53223-213 1 Responsibl e Official : To mJ . Felme r Genera l Manage r (414)358-660 0 Permi t Contac t Person : Janee nE Jackso n Environmenta l Enginee r (414)358-660 0 Dat e o f Administrativel yComplet e Application : 05/24/9 5 Date s o f Submittal : May24 , 199 5 (Applicationreceive d a t SED) , Jun e 26 , 199 6 (Sit e inspectio nreport) , Jul y1 , 199 6 (S1 0 Stac k information) , Jul y26 , 199 6 (phone conversation) , and Jul y26 , 199 6 (PT

E limitations) .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 2



# NP.1 6

SOURC E DESCRIPTION Brad yU.S.A. , Incorporate d operate s a facilit yknow na s thei r Signmark " Divisio n(CameronAvenu e Facility) . Th e facilit ymanufacture s fiberglas s signs . Locate d withi nth e facilit yar e thre e significan t ai r pollutan t emissio n sources . Thes e source s are : Proces s ££U££ £ Stac k Uni t O'Har e Fiberglas s SignProductio nLin e SI O P3 0 Miscellaneou s Finishing Operation s S1 4 P3 3 Medalis t Scree nPrinting Pres s S3 0 P3 5 Th e O'Har e Lin e (proces s P30 ) i s a custom-designe d proces s lin e use d t o produc e cure d fiberglas s sheeting . Wove nfiberglas s webbing i s coate d wit ha reactiv e styrene-base d resi nan d ove ncured . Th e bul k styren e resi ni s store d i na 6000-gallo n underground storag e tank . Whe nneeded , the day' s resi n requiremen t i s transferre d fro mthe bul k tank t o smalle r indoo r mixin g tanks . I nth e smalle r tanks , th e resi ni s mixe d and heated . The heate d resi ni s mechanicall yapplie d t o th e sheet s o f fiberglas s webbing an d temperatur e cured . Graphic s ar e applie d betwee ntw o sheet s o f the coate d webbing prio r t o ove ncuring . Th e curing ove ni s natura l ga s fired . Th e indoo r mixin g tanks , th e coating operations , and the curing ove nar e al l separatel yexhauste d t o th e outsid e ambien t ai r throughfixe d stacks . Stac k SIO*represent s a composit e o f thes e thre e stacks . Severa l differen t finishing operation s ar e performe d t o machin e th e cure d fiberglas s sheeting int o th e finishe d product , informationa l signs . Proces s P3 3 represent s the combinatio no f thes e miscellaneou s finishing operations . Proces s P3 3 include s two router s (on e fo r cornering an

d on e fo r shaping) , thre e dril l presse s (on e single-spindl e and tw o multi-spindle) , and two bel t sanders . Th e particulat e emission s fromthes e operation s ar e exhauste d t o th e outsid e ambien t ai r througha fixe d stack , Stac k S33 . Abaghous e styl e contro l devic e i s use d t o reduc e th e exhauste d particulat e emission s fromthi s stack . Amanuall yoperate d shee t fed scree nprinting pres s (proces s P35 ) i s als o availabl e t o custommanufactur e graphic s fo r the signs . Th e scree nprinting pres s i s a smal l singl e shee t feed press . Onl ysolvent-base d ink s ar e used . Th e printe d material s ar e ai r drie d withi nthe facilit yo ndesignate d drying racks . Th e ai r emission s fro mthe usag e o f inks , thinning agents , retarding agents , and cleanu p solvent s ar e no t exhauste d outsid e the building , bu t instead ar e release d a s indoo r fugitive s (Stack S30) . Sit e Description : Al l manufacturing an d converting operation s ar e performe d i na singl e building locate d o na 1.23-acr e parce l o f lan d i nth e Cit yo f Milwaukee . Th e facilit y i s locate d a t 332 8 Wes t Camero nAvenue , nort ho f Hampto nAvenu e and sout ho f Villar d Avenue . Railroad track s defin e th e eas t propert yline . Th e surrounding are a i s residential . Milwauke e Count yi s designate d a sever e ozon e nonattainmen t area .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 3 

# ftP.1 7

SIGNIFICANT EMISSIO NSOURCES : STAC K INFORMATIO

N Stac k Identificatio nNumber : Exhausting Unit(s) : Thi s stac k ha s anactua l exhaus t point : Discharg e heigh t above groun d leve l (ft ) Insid e dimension s a t outle t (ft) : Exhaus t flowrat e (Normal ) (ACFM) : Exhaus t ga s temperatur e (Normal ) (°F) : Exhaus t ga s discharg e direction : Stac k equippe d wit han yobstruction : Emissio n Uni t Informatio n Proces s number : Uni t description : O'Har e fiberglas s coating line , natura l ga s curing oven . Contro l technolog

ystatus : Dat e o f constructio no r las t modification :



# =0 = Rawmaterial s 

## =D = Maximu

mUsag e Styren e Resi n Cleanup Solven t



### r Produc t Sign s 392,25 0 gals/yr 1,57 0 gals/yr T Maximu

mOutpu t 88 1 signs/yr SI O P3 0 Ye s (Composite ) 29. 5 Circula r - 1.3 8 1,90 8 8 4 U p N o

P3 0 equippe d wit ha Uncontrolle d Marc h197 8

2 . STAC K INFORMATIO N Stac k Identificatio nNumber : Exhausting Unit(s) : Thi s stac k ha s anactua l exhaus t point : Discharg e heigh t above groun d leve l (ft) : Insid e dimension s a t outle t (ft) : Exhaus t flowrat e (Normal) " (ACFM ) r Exhaus t ga s temperatur e (Normal ) (°F) : Exhaus t ga s discharg e direction : Stac k equippe d wit han yobstruction : A . Emissio n Uni t Informatio n S1 4 P3 3 Ye s 25. 0 Circula r 4,-80 0 7 0 U p N o -1.3 0

Proces s number : Uni t description : P3 3 Miscellaneou s finishing operations : on e singl e spindl e dril l press , two multi-spindl e dril l presses , on e roun

d corne r router , on e shaping router , and tw o bel t sanders .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 4



# lbP.1 8

Contro l technologystatus : Dat e o f constructio no r las t modification : 

## =D = Controlle d Augus t 197 9 Produc t 

## 0 = Maximu mOutpu t Sign s 50 0 signs/hr * Th e maximu

mproductio nrat e i s dependen t upo nth e specifi c operatio nbein g performe d (Corne r route r and bel t sande r 50 0 signs/hr , multi-spindl e dril l pres s 35 0 signs/hr , single-spindl e dril l pres s 15 0 signs/hr , and shaping route r 3 0 signs/hr) . Contro l device s associate d wit hthi s emission s uni t Emissio nuni t controlled : Contro l devic e number : Dat e o f installation : Descriptio no f device : P3 3 C3 3 198 6 Particulat e matte r emission s ar e controlle d wit h the us e o f a Tori t Downfl o Mode l 2DF1 2 particulat e contro l devic e manufacture d b y Donaldso nCompany , Inc . Pollutant(s ) controlle d Captur e Hood(s ) Particulat e Matte r (PM ) Efficienc y(% ) 70. 0 99. 9
Pressur e drop acros s th e filte r (inche s o f H20 ) Filte r mediu

mo r typ e o f material : Maximu minle t ga s flo wrat e (ACFM) : Maximu minle t ga s temperatur e (°F ) : Numbe r o f cartridges : Dimension s o f cartridges : STAC K INFORMATIO

N 1 - 6 Ultra-we b 4,80 0 7 0 1 2 13. 8 Di a x2 6

Stac k Identificatio nNumber : Exhausting Unit(s) : Thi s stac k ha s anactua l exhaus t point : S3 0 P3 5 No (Fugitive ) A . Emissio nUni t Informatio n Proces s number : P3 0 Uni t description : SP- 5 shee t fed scree nprinting pres s wit h Air-drie d drying racks . Operatio n type : Curing Oven : Contro l technologystatus : Dat e o f constructio no r las t modification : Scree nPrinting No Uncontrolle d Novembe r 199 2

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 5



# inP.1 9



## 0 Rawmaterial s I Maximu mUsag e 

## =0 = Ink s Thinnin g Agent s Retarding Agent s Cleanup Solvent s 1,18 5 gals/yr 12 7 gals/yr 3 9 gals/yr 1,73 0 gals/yr INSIGNIFICAN

T EMISSIO

NSOURCES : Maintenanc e o f Grounds , Equipment , and Building s Deminerizatio n an

d Oxyge nScavenging o f Wate r fo r Boiler s Purging o f Natura l Ga s Line s Boiler , Turbine , and HVAC SystemMaintenanc e Interna l Combustio nEngin e Use d fo r Warehous e an d Materia l Transpor t Fir e Contro l Equipmen t Janitoria l Service s Offic e Activitie s Convenienc e Wate r Heating ( < 5 mmBtu/h r Burning Ga s - 3-0. 8 mmBtu/hr ) SanitarySewe r an

d Plumbing Venting Pollutio nContro l Equipmen t Maintenanc e DB E Soa k Tank (36-gallon part s cleaner ) Miscellaneou s Solven t Cleanu p Resi n Tank Storag e (6000-gallon ) Coatin g an

d Solven t Storag e Composit e Cutting Operatio n INSIGNIFICAN

T EMISSIO

NSOURC E DESCRIPTION : Th e sourc e identifie d severa l insignifican t ai r emissio nunit s and activitie s othe r tha n thos e normall yidentifie d o nfor m4530-102 B i nth e application . Thes e emissio nunit s an d activitie s ar e describe d belo wi ngreate r detail . DB E Soa k Tank (36-gallonpart s cleaner ) Anorgani c solven t soak tank i s use d t o cleanresidua l resi nfromth e coating head s o f th e O'Har e line . Th e soak tank i s equippe d wit ha flip-to p lid . The tan k i s no t vented . Solven t emission s ar e release d a s indoo r fugitives . The organi c solven t i s Dupon t Dibasi c Este r (DBE ) blend . Th e solven t blend doe s no t contai nan

yorgani c HAPs . Th e solven t blen d ha s a relativel ylo w evaporatio n fate, " les s than0.1 0 (n-Buty l Acetat e = l) . Th e sourc e estimate s thei r yearl yusag e a t 1,00 0 pound s pe r year . Sinc e th e coating lin e i s cleane d onc e pe r dayn o matte r i f the lin e run s 1 hou r o r 2 3 hours , the line' s MT E VO C i s estimate d a t 1,46 0 pound s pe r yea r [100 0 lbs/y r x(36 5 dys/yr . * 25 0 dys/yr ) •

= 1,46 0 lbs/yr] . The emissio nuni t i s insignifican t fo r th e emissio n o f VOC . Miscellaneou s Solven t Cleanu p Organi c solvent s (e.g. , Acetone ) ar e use d throughou t the plan t t o spo t clean equipment . Actua l cleanu p solven t usag e i s quit e low . Th e solven t i s manuall ydispense d fro mthe large r container s int o individua l squir t bottle s o r smalle r persona l containers . Al l container s ar e covere d and designe d t o preven t evaporatio nint o th e atmosphere . Organi c solven t emission s ar e insignifican t (MTE i s estimate d a t les s than10 0 lbs/yr) . Acetone , a VO C exemp t organi c solvent , i s presentl yused . Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 6



# llP.2 0

Resi nStorag e Tank (600 0 gallons ) Anunderground tank i s locate d a t the facilit yfo r th e bul k storag e o f th e styrene-base d resin . Plan s ar e t o remov e th e underground tank an d replac e i t wit hanabov e ground tank o f simila r size . Estimate d tan k emission s o f VOC s ar e 1,18 5 pound s pe r yea r fo r the underground tank and 1,42 7 pound s pe r yea r fo r th e propose d abov e ground tank . Tank emission s wer e estimate d usin g standard tank calculation s an d provide d b

yth e source . Th e estimate s ar e presume d t o b e th e tanks ' MT E estimates . Coating and Solven t Storag e Variou s inks , coatings , and organi c solvent s ar e store d withi nth e facility . Th e solven t and coatin g container s ar e seale d whil e being stored . Bul k solven t (e.g. , Acetone ) i s als o store d a t time s withi nth e facilit yi n55

- gallo ndrums . Bul k solven t i s dispense d fromthes e drum s t o smalle r container s (les s tha n 1 gallon) . The solven t i s use d fo r spo t cleaning o f equipment . VO C emission s ar e considere d insignifican t (MT E i s estimate d a t les s tha n20 0 pound s pe r year) . Composit e Cuttin g Operation s Mechanicall ythe cure d composit e sheeting i s cu t (divided ) int o smalle r pieces . Th e shearing proces s i s rathe r slo wand emit s minima l particulat e matter . N o VOC 1 emission s occur . Th e operatio ni s a ninsignifican t P M emissio nsource . CROS S MEDI A

IMPACT S The cros s medi a impac t o f th e facilityand it s operation s wer e no t analyze d i n grea t detail . Aminima l cros s medi a impac t i s anticipated . Use d cleanin g solvent , ink , and coating container s an d relate d liqui d waste s ar e shippe d off-sit e fo r disposal . Th e particulat e matte r wast e collecte d fro mth e sign machining operation s i s dispose d o f a s nonhazardou s waste . SOURCE SPECIFI C EMISSIO N LIMI T CALCULATIONS The facilit ymanufacture s industria l fiberglas s signs . Afiberglas s cure d sytrene-base d resi ncomposit e i s the substrat e fo r th e sign s produced . Th e sourc e use s a custombuil t an d designe d coating lin e (O'Har e Lin e - Proces s P30 ) t o manufactur e th e cure d fiberglass/resi nsubstrate . Betwee ntw o layer s o f fiberglas s webbing.th e sign' s graphic s ar e inserte d befor e the composit e i s cured . Th e O'Har e proces s lin e coat s the fiberglas s web s wit hresin , applie s the graphi c sheet s (decals ) an d temperatur e cure s th e composite . Th e cure d "'c"61iiposlte7~"6r~'^ub'stFat"e / i s the n ''mamTalT

ymachine d int o th e finishe d produc t (signs) . Aserie s o f miscellaneou s finishing operation s i s performe d t o machin e th e cure d substrate . Thes e finishing activitie s (Proces s P33 ) includ e hol e drilling (on

e single-spindl e dril l pres s and tw o multi-spindl e dril l presses) , shaping (on e corne r route r an

d on e shaping router ) an d sanding (tw

o bel t sanders) . Th e graphics , o r decals , ar e eithe r purchase d o r manufacture d in-house . Th e facilit yha s o nthe sit e a smal l shee t fe d scree nprintin g pres s use d t o manufactur e customgraphic s (Proces s P35) . Th e ai r emission s fro mProces s P3 0 (fiberglas s coating line ) an d Proces s P3 3 (finishin g operations ) ar e exhauste d t o the outsid e ambien t ai r throughfixe d stacks . A baghous e styl e contro l devic e i s use d t o contro l th e particulat e matte r (PM ) emission s generate d fromth e miscellaneou s finishing operations . Ai r emission s fromth e scree nprinting operatio nar e no t exhausted ; theyar e release d a s indoo r fugitives .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 7 

# 19P.2 1

I nth e permi t application , th e maximu mrawmateria l usag e rate s o r th e maximu m productio ncapacitie s ar e specifie d fo r eac hprocess . Asupplemen t sectio n wa s provide d wit hth e origina l applicatio ndetailing ho wthes e rate s and capacitie s wer e determined . Thes e calculation s hav e bee nreviewe d and found t o b e consisten t wit hth e emission s fro msimila r industria l operations . Thi s permi t supplemen t i s availabl e upo nrequest . T o estimat e th e source' s maximu memission s one take s int o accoun t no t onl ythe equipment' s physica l limitations , bu t als o an ylimitation s du e t o th e chemica l natur e o f th e rawmaterial s used . Fromthes e maximu musage s o r productio n capacitie s th e units ' Maximu mTheoretica l Emission s (MTEs ) can b e estimated . Anoperationa l yea r o f 876 0 hour s i s assumed . A s par t o f th e 876 0 hour s o f operation , th e averag e hour s pe r yea r spen t setting up and cleaning u p equipment , betwee nproductio nruns , ar e included . Bot hfiberglas s coating (Proces s P30 ) an

d scree nprinting (Proces s P35 ) hav e setu p an d cleanu

p time s associate d wit hthem . Whe nthe equipment' s usag e i s limite d byth e availabilit yo f rawmaterial , a differen t approac hi s needed . I n thi s facility , some o f th e equipmen t use d t o performth e miscellaneou s finishing operations , o r activities , ar e limite d no t b yth e desig ncapacit yo f the individua l equipment , bu t b yth e availabilit yo f cure d fiberglas s substrate . Sinc e al l cure d fiberglas s substrat e i s produce d internall yan d th e finishing equipmen t i s use d solel yfo r th e machining o f th e cure d fiberglass , the productio no f cure d fiberglas s fro mth e coating lin e (proces s P30 ) ca n b e emissio nlimiting . Below , i n Tabl e 1 , the MTE s o f particulat e matte r (PM) , volatil e organi c compound s (VOCs) , and hazardou s ai r pollutant s (HAPs ) ar e summarize d fo r no t onl yth e individua l emissio nunits , bu t fo r th e facility . Th e ai r pollutan t emission s ar e estimate d using supplie r informatio n(Materia l Safet yDat a Sheets ) ah

d interna l tes t results . Emission s fromaccessoryequipmen t (e.g. , curing ovens ) an

d activitie s (e.g. , cleanups ) ar e included . Tabl e 1 Maximu

m Theoretica l Emission s (lbs/yr) : 

### PpUutant ; P M 

### vo c Ethy l Benzen e Styren e Toluen e Xylen e Resi nCoating

Proces s P3 0

0 528,00 0 0 518,00 0 0 0 SignFinishing Proces s P3 3 33,10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scree nPrinting

Proces s P3 5

0 18,30 0 12 4 0 7,56 0 1,96 0 Tota l

Facilit y 33,10 0 546,30 0 12 4 518,00 0 7,56 0 1,96 0 Whe nestimating th e fiberglas s coating line' s emission s (Proces s P30) , th e reactiv e natur e o f the styrene-base d monome r i s considered;Th e coating resi n i s 2 8 - 3 3 percen t styren e monomer , bu t styren e i s als o temperatur e reactive . Some o f th e monome r i s polymerize d a s par t o f th e temperatur e curing process . Aweigh t b

ydifferenc e stud

ywa s conducte d b

yth e source' s R& D staf f t o determin e th e actua l amoun t o f VOC , o r styrene , los t during coating an d curing o f th e resi n(Proces s P30) . Th e tes t result s showed , unde r norma l operating conditions , 1.3 2 pound s o f VOC , o r styrene , pe r gallo no f resi napplie d i s lost . VOC s fro

mproces s P3 0 ar e release d a s bot hfugitiv e an d stacke d emissions . Becaus e o f th e fugitiv e natur e o f some o f th e emissions , th e sourc e originall yunderestimate d th e emission s o f VOC , o r styrene , from,th e fiberglas s coating lin e (0. 8 pound s pe r gallon) . Thi s emissio nestimat e wa s use d a s a basi s i n Permi t 90-DAA-227 . However , a s a resul t o f th e weight-los s tes t became known , the allowabl e emissio nlimitatio nwa s change d t o 1.3 5 pound s o f VO C pe r gallo no f resi napplie d an d a ne wpermi t wa s issue d (Permi t 92-DAA-296) . Permi t 92-DAA-29 6 supersede d Permi t 90-DAA-227 . Whe nestimating styren e emissions , th e wors t cas e i s assumed ; al l proces s P3 0 VO C emission s Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 8 

# •3.DP.2 2

ar e assume d t o b e styrene-monomer . Th e emissio nrat e o f 1.3 2 pound s o f VOC , o r styrene , pe r gallo napplie d i s use d t o calculat e th e coating line' s MT E o f bot hVO C and styrene . Th e proces s P30' s curing ove ni s a smal l natura l ga s fire d ove n (1. 2 mmBTU/hr) ; therefore , th e oven' s ai r emission s ar e assume d t o b e insignifican t and ignored . Th e MT E calculation s fo r th e miscellaneou s signfinishing activitie s (Proces s P33) , o r P Memissions , ar e base d directl yupo nthe averag e amoun t o f materia l remove d fromth e cure d fiberglas s substrat e during machining . Th e wors t cas e i s assumed . Th e weigh t o f particulat e matte r emitte d i s equa l t o th e weigh t o f materia l removed . Th e maximu mavailabilit yo f cure d fiberglas s composit e i s als o take nint o accoun t whe ndetermining the operation' s MTE . Depending upo nth e specifi c activit ybeing performe d (e.g. , sanding , drilling , cornering , and shaping) , th e MT E i s eithe r limite d b yth e maximu mproductio n rat e o f th e specifi c piec e o f equipmen t o r th e availabilit yo f composite . N o distinctio ni s mad e whethe r o r no t al l finishing operation s ar e normall y performe d o na singl e sign . Th e wors t cas e i s assumed ; al l sign s ar e drilled , sanded , and eithe r shape d o r cornered . Shaping refer s t o makin g th e sign round ; therefore , a signtha t i s shape d canno t b e cornere d and vic e versa . Shaping an d cornering canno t b e performe d o nthe same sign . Estimatio no f th e scree nprintin g operation' s MT E (Proces s P35) , bot hVO C and HAPs , i s relativel ystraightforward . P Memission s ar e insignifican t and VO C emission s equa l th e amount s o f VO C containe d i nth e ink s applied . Th e sourc e take s int o accoun t an yphysica l restriction s whe ndetermining th e proces s line' s MTE . Th e proces s line' s maximu moutpu t i s limite d ultimatel ybyth e amoun t o f availabl e drying rac k spac e available . Aminima l tw o hour s o f ai r dryin g i s require d betwee nruns . However , th e equipmen t ca nstil l b e solven t cleane d whil e th e scree nprint s ar e drying . Condensibl e P Memission s ar e considere d insignifican t fo r Proces s P3 0 an d Proces s P35 . Bot hprocesse s ar e coating operations ; th e processing temperature s use d ar e relativel ylow ; n o visua l condensibl e emission s wer e apparen t durin g anon-sit e visi t o f th e facility ; and th e facility' s cas e fil e historydoe s no t mentio nanypreviou s problem s wit hP Mo r visua l emissions . Base d upo nth e result s i nTabl e 1 an d th e individua l pollutan t inclusio n level s publishe d i nChapte r N R407 , Tabl e 2 , Wis . Adm . Code , th e facilit yi s significan t fo r th e emissio no f PM , VOC , and Styrene . Eac hsignifican t ai r pollutan t ha s a nMT E greate r tha nth e 2,000pound s pe r yea r fo r a singl e emissio nuni t and greate r tha n10,000'pound s pe r yea r fo r th e facilit y( 5 time s th e unit' s inclusio nlevel) . Onl ythos e pollutant s whic har e significan t and hav e applicabl e emissio nlimit s nee d t o b e addresse d i nPar t I o f th e permit . Th e emissio no f insignifican t pollutant s and thos e significan t pollutant s withou t an yapplicabl e emissipn.limit s ar e addresse d i nPar t I I o f th e permit . Ethy l BehzeTie , Toluene , and Xylen e ar e insignifican t pollutants . T o full yaddres s al l applicabl e emissio nlimitation s o r usag e restrictions , eac hsignifican t pollutan t wil l b e discusse d separately , PM , VOC , an d Styrene . Thi s discussio nwil l address , bu t i s no t limite d to , existing emissio n limitations , condition s carrie d ove r frompreviou s permits , change s bein g mad e t o th e carrie d ove r conditions , possibl e modeling restrictions , an d th e permit' s impac t o nth e source' s Potentia l t o Emi t (PTE) . 

### Particulat e Matte r (PM ) Onl yon e emissio nsourc e i s significan t fo r the emissio no f soli d PM , processe s P3 3 (Finishin g operations) . Th e othe r two significan t emissio n unit s (fiberglas s coating and scree nprinting ) ar e insignifican t fo r P M emissions , bu t significan t fo r VO C emissions . Condensibl e PMemission s canb e a concer nwit hsome VO C sources , bu t considering th e fac t tha t thes e Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 9 

# y?iP.2 3

operation s involv e lowoversprayapplicatio ntechnique s (e.g. , flo wcoating and printing) , the operating temperature s ar e relativel ylow , fugitiv e emission s ar e significant , n o visua l emission s wer e detecte d durin g anon-sit e inspection , and PMand visua l emission s hav e no t bee na problemi nth e past , theyar e considere d insignifican t and wil l no t b e include d i npar t I o f thi s permit . A"wors t case " analysi s i s use d whe nestimating Proces s P33' s PMemissions , whateve r amoun t o f materia l i s remove d fromth e composit e during processin g is , o r coul d be , release d a s PM . Th e MT E o f PMfo r the P3 3 operatio ni s represente d b

ythe su

mo f th e MTE s fo r the variou s activitie s describe d b y proces s P33 . Eac hactivit yneed s t o b e looke d a t individually . Eac h activity , o r piec e o f equipment , ha s it s ow nmaximu

mproductio nrate . No t al l sign s ar e processe d i nth e identica l fashion . Some requir e mor e processing . Other s requir e less . The basi s o f a naverag e signi s ultimatel yestablishe d t o simplif ythi s issue . Fo r eac hfinishing operation , th e maximumproductio n rate , o r output , and the averag e amoun t o f materia l removed , o r P Memitted , ar e establishe d o na pe r averag e signbasis . Anaverag e signi s describe d a s 1. 0 squar e fee t o f composit e weighing 0.7 7 pounds . Anothe r factor , whe n estimating emission s ove r a year , i s whethe r o r no t the suppl yo f cure d composit e indirectl ylimit s th e emission s fro mthes e activities . Base d upo n th e maximumproductio ncapacit yo f th e 0'Har e fiberglas s coating line , th e maximu msignoutpu t rat e o f composit e i s 88 1 sign s pe r hour . I f a specifi c finishing operation' s outpu t capacit yexceed s th e availabilit yo f composit e material , th e availabilit yo f composit e the nbecome s emissio nlimiting whe n determining th e activity' s MTE . Tabl e 2 , below , summarize s no t onl ythe MT E o f P Mfo r th e individua l finishing operations , bu t als o some o f th e majo r assumption s made . Tabl e 2 Maximu

m Theoretica l Emission s o f P M (Proces s P3 3 - Finishin g Operations ) 

### Operatio n Corne r Route r Mult i spindl e Dril l Single-spindl e Dril l Shaping Route r Bel t Sande r Numbe r o f 

### Units * 1 2 1 1 2 Maximu

m Usag e (sions/hr ) 50 0 35 0 15 0 3 0 50 0 /

i Amount * Remove d 

### (ftZ/sign ) 0.0015 6 0.0010 4 0.0010 4 0.0330 6 0.0048 8 Maximu

mTheoretica l Emission s (lbs/hr ) 0.60 2 0.55 9 0.12 0 0.76 4 3.7 5

. . 5.8 0 O f PM

Ubs/yj*; ) 5,26 0 •4,450* * 1,05 0 6,69 0 20,900* * 33,090** *

* Th e averag e surfac e densit yo f th e signcomposit e i s 0.7 7 lbs/ft2 . Th e annua l emissio n calculation s tak e int o accoun t th e maximum

operating parameter s o f th e P3 0 coating lin e [88 1 signs/hr , 630 7 hrs/yr (1 5 hr s o f coating/16.7 5 hr s & 20 % scrap ] o r 5,556,00 0 sign s pe r year . ** * Th e su

mfo r proces s P3 3 doe s no t include d th e annua l MT E emission s from th e corne r router . Sinc e eac hsigni s eithe r shaped o r cornered , th e operatio nwit hthe greates t annua l MT E emission s (i.e. , Shaping ) i s include d whe ndetermining the proces s line' s tota l annua l emissions . Base d upo nthes e results , an d the fac t tha t no limitation s exis t tha t limit s the facility' s PTE P Mt o les s thanth e MT E rat e o nhourl ybasis , th e finishing operations , o r Proces s P33 , ha s a maximu muncontrolle d emissio nrat e o f 5.8 0 pound s o f P Mpe r hour . Proces s P33' s emission s ar e exhauste d througha fixe d stack . Th e stacke d emission s ar e controlle d b ya baghous e styl e particulat e contro l device , a Tori t Downfl o system(Mode l 2DF4) . The sourc e report s a 7 0 percen t captur e efficiencyo f the exhaus t hoo d systeman d a PMcontro l efficienc yo f 99. 9 percent . Base d upo nthes e conditions , th e operatio nha s Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 1 0



# aaP.2 4

PT E PMemission s o f 1.7 4 pound s pe r hour o f fugitive s and 0.00 4 pound s pe r hou r o f stac k emissions . Sinc e th e proces s operatio nwa s las t modified , o r constructed , i nAugus t o f 197 9 an d the facilityi s no t locate d in , o r near , a TS P nonattainmen t area , th e proces s weigh t equatio nPMemissio nlimitatio n applie s [s . NR415.05(2) , Wis . Adm . Code] . I f the proces s weigh t emissio n limi t i s les s restrictiv e tha nth e fixed emissio nlimi t establishe d i ns . NR 415.05(1) , Wis . Adm . Code , th e emissio nlimi t give ni ns . N R415.0 5 (l)(o) , Wis . Adm . Code , applie s (0.4 0 pound s o f particulat e matte r pe r 1,00 0 pound s o f gas) . Assumin g eac hsignweigh s 0.7 7 pound s an d o na nhourl ybasi s an d a maximu mo f 2,38 0 sign s ca nb e processe d pe r hour , th e proces s weigh t equatio n give s a maximu

memissio nrat e o f 3.4 0 pound s pe r hou r [3.5 9 x(2,38 0 signs/h r x0.7 7 lbs/sign-5

- 200 0 lbs/ton) 0

- 6 2 = 3.4 0 lbs/hr] . Assuming anai r densit yo f 0.07 5 pound s pe r cubi c foo t o f exhaus t ga s a t 7 0 degree s F an d anexhaus t flo w rat e o f 4,80 0 acf mfromStac k S14 , the fixe d emissio nlimi t i s equivalen t t o a maximu mPMemissio nlimi t o f 8.6 4 pound s pe r hou r [(0.4 0 lbs/1031b s o f ga s + 100 0 lb s o f gas/1031b s o f gas ) x(0.07 5 lbs/ft 3 x4,80 0 ft3/mi nx6 0 mins/hr ) =-•8.6 4 lbs/hr] . Base d upo nthes e calculations , th e proces s weigh t emissio n limitatio ni s th e mos t restrictive an d the proces s i s i ncomplianc e wit hth e P Memissio nlimi t a s long a s th e hoo d systeman d PMcollectio ndevic e ar e operating . T o demonstrat e complianc e wit hth e proces s equatio nP Memissio n limi t th e sourc e wil l operat e the baghous e styl e particulat e contro l device . A s specifie d unde r s . NR439.055(2)(b) , Wis . Adm . Code , the sourc e mus t measur e and recor d onc e fo r ever yeigh t (8 ) hour s o f operatio no r onc e pe r day , whicheve r yield s th e greate r numbe r o f measurements , th e pressur e dro p acros s th e collectio ndevic e i nunit s o f inche s o f water . Th e norma l pressur e drop acros s th e systemi s 1 t o 6 inche s o f water . Sinc e thi s i s a particulat e source , and th e opportunit yfo r a visua l emissio ni s likely . Unde r s . N R 431.05 , Wis . Adm . Code , th e sourc e i s require d t o limi t thei r emission s t o a shad e o r densit yn o greate r thannumbe r 1 o f th e Ringlema n char t o r 2 0 percen t opacity . T o demonstrat e complianc e wit hth e visua l emissio nlimi t th e same complianc e demonstratio nmetho d use d t o compl ywit hth e P Memissio nlimit s wil l b e used , th e sourc e wil l b e require d t o operat e th e P Mcollectio ndevic e wheneve r PMi s being generate d fro mProces s P33 . Base d upo nth e usag e o f th e P Mcollectio n(hood ) an d PMcontro l (Downflo ) system s an

d th e fac t tha t the operatio no f a particulat e contro l devic e wil l b e mad e federall yenforceabl e b ythi s permit , th e source' s PT E PMi s les s tha n it s MT E level . I naddition , i nanexisting permi t (Permi t 92-DAA-296 ) th e sourc e i s limite d t o using onl y12,00 0 gallon s o f styrene-base d resi npe r mont ht o produc e composit e material . Considering thi s limit , th e fac t tha t th e productio nrat e o f th e P3 0 coating line i s 88 1 sign s pe r hou r a t th e maximu mcoating usag e rat e o f 5 0 gallon s pe r hour , and th e proces s experience s a 2 0 percen t scrap rate , th e sourc e i s indirectl ylimite d t o producing onl y 2,537,00 0 sign s pe r yea r [12,00 0 gals/mo n x1 2 mons/yr x(88 1 signs/hr - r 5 0 gals/hr ) x( 1 - 0.2 0 scrap ) = 2,030,00 0 signs/yr] . Fromthi s annua l numbe r o f sigh s produce d ari

d estimate d 'amounts"o f materia l remove d pe r operation " pe r sign(Tabl e 2) , th e unit' s PT E P Mwit han

d withou t P

Mcontro l canb e determined . A s state d earlier , onl y7 0 percen t o f th e P Memission s ar e collecte d b

yth e hoo d system . Tha t mean s 3 0 percen t o f the P Mi s release d a s fugitive emissions . O f th e 7 0 percen t tha t i s captured , the contro l devic e i s 99. 9 percen t efficien t a t removing PM . Withou t control s an d usag e limits , th e sourc e ha s anMT E o f PMo f 33,10 0 pound s pe r year , o r 16. 6 tpy , fo r Proces s P3 3 (finishin

g operations) . Wit hthe 12,00 0 gallon s pe r mont husag e limi t o n the resin , the unit' s PT E P Mdrop s t o 17,50 0 pound s pe r year , o r 8. 8 tpy . Wit hth e additiona l us e o f the PMcollectio nan d contro l systems , the unit' s PT E P Mi s furthe r reduce d t o 5,25 0 pound s pe r year , o r 2.6 3 tpy . Se e Tabl e 3 , below , fo r mor e detail .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 1 1 

# <53P.2 5

Tabl e 3 Potentia l to Emi t P M (Proces s P33 , Finishin gOperations ) Numbe r Maximu

m Amount * Potentia l t o Emi t PM 

### o f Operatio n Unit s Corne r Route r 1 Mult i spindl e Dril l 2 Single-spindl e Dril l 1 Shaping Route r 1 Bel t Sande r 2 Usag e (sons/hr l 

### 50 0 35 0 15 0 3 0 

### 50 0 Remove d

(ft2/sgn ) 0.0015 6 0.0010 4 0.0010 4 0.0330 6 0.0048 8 w/ o Contro l w/Contro l

(M-P/Y-O* * (lbs/yr.)** * 2,44 0 73 3 2,11 0 63 4 1,05 0 *** * 31 6 *** * 6,69 0 *** * 2,01 0 *** * 7,63 0 2,29 0

. 17,50 0 **** * 5,25 0 *** *

* Th e averag e surfac e densit yo f th e signcomposit e i s 0.7 7 lbs/ft2 . * * P Memission s ar e indirectl ylimite d b ythe gallon s o f resi nuse d [12,00 0 gals/mo n x1 2 mons/yr x(88 1 signs/hr + 5 0 gals/hr ) x( 1 - 0.20 ) = 2,030,00 0 signs/yr] . ** * 7 0 percen t captur e and 99. 9 percen t control . *** * Emission s ar e limite d b yth e designcapacityo f the equipment . **** * Th e "totals " d o no t includ e emission s fro mth e cornering operatio nsinc e th e emission s fro

mth e shaping operatio nar e included . Base d upo nth e unit' s MTE , an d considering thi s i s th e onl yuni t significan t fo r th e emissio no f PM , th e sourc e i s a natura l mino r fo r PM , les s tha n10 0 tpyo f PM-10 . PMo r TS P i s no t normall ymodele d b ythe department . Instead , th e departmen t relie s upo nth e code , o r P Memissionlimitations , t o protec t th e P Mambien t ai r qualit ystandards . Wit hthe carry-ove r o f th e resi nusag e limi t fromPermi t 92-DAA-29 6 an d th e require d usag e o f the P Mcollectio nan

d contro l devices , th e uni t shoul d b e i ncomplianc e wit hth e applicabl e PM emissio nlimitations . Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOCs ) Tw o emissio nunit s ar e significan t fo r th e emissio no f volatil e organi c compound s (VOCs) , Proces s P3 0 (Fiberglas s coating ) an d Proces s P3 5 (Screen Printing ) . Eac huni t ha s anindividua l MT E o f VO C greate r tha n200 0 pound s pe r yea r and a combine d MT E greate r tha n10,00 0 pound s pe r year . Whe nestimatin g anemissio nunit' s emission s one mus t loo k a t th e complet e operatio no f th e proces s line . Th e time spen t setting u p an d cleanin g equipmen t mus t b e included . During fiberglas s coating a certai namoun t o f time i s spen t setting u p an d cleaning th e proces s line . Whe nthes e operation s ar e bein g performed , th e systemcanno t b e producing cure d composite . Th e same i s als o tru e wit hscree nprinting . Acertai namoun t o f time i s spen t setting u p equipment , thinning inks , mixing i nin k retarders , cleaning th e equipmen t an d "screens', ' an

d waiting fo r the printe d sheet s t o dry . Althoughth e time spen t applyin g resi nan d in k mayb e limited , othe r VO C emitting activitie s can b e performe d (i.e. , solven t cleaning equipment) . The units ' MTE s represent s the su mo f al l VO C emitting activities . Overall , the units ' MTE s ar e base d upo nmaximu

mru nsize s (13,20 0 squar e fee t o f composit e every16.7 5 hour s an d 4 0 printe d every2.5 3 hours ) an d 876 0 hour s o f operatio npe r year . Fromthi s information , on e i s abl e t o estimat e th e VO C emission s fo r eac hoperatio npe r proces s unit . The pertinen t informatio ni s provide d i nanapplicatio n supplemen t supplie d b ythe source . Highlight s ar e summarize d belo wi nTabl e 4 .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 1 2



# MTabl e 4 Maximu m Theoretica l Emissions o f Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOCs ) Fiberglas s Coatin g (Proces s P30 ) :Time Operatio n(hrs/cvcle)(hrs/yeaff ) Resi ncoating and curing 15.0 0 784 5 Equipmen t setu

p 1.0 0 52 3 Equipmen t cleanup 0.7 5 39 2 Scree nPrinting (Proces s P35 ) Operatio n In k Applicatio n Thinning Retarding Equipmen t Cleanup Equipmen t Setu

p Time

.hrs/cvcle , [______$_) 0.5 3 0.5 3 0.5 3 1.0 0 1.0 0 183 5

183 5 183 5 346 2 346 2 MT E Emissio nRate s

(crcq/hg ) (IbaVOC/hr ) .lbsVOC/yr ) 50. 0 66. 0 518,00 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 4. 0 26. 4 10.00 0 Subtota l 528,00 0

MT E Emissio nRate s (__l___) (lbsVOC/hr ) (lbsVOC/yr ) 0.64 4 2.6 4 4,85 0 0.06 9 0.4 6 83 6 0.02 1 0.1 4 25 4 0.50 0 3.5 8 12,40 0 0. 0 0. 0 a Subtota l 18,30 0 Tota l 546,30 0 Base d upo nthes e calculations , bot hfiberglas s coating an d th e scree nprintin g ar e significan t fo r th e emissio no f VOC . However , becaus e th e operation s o f th e two VO C unit s differ , differen t emissio nlimit s apply . Th e fiberglas s coating operatio n(Proces s P30 ) wa s constructe d (Marcho f 1978 ) befor e Milwauke e Count ywa s designated anozon e nonattainmen t area . Afte r Milwauke e wa s designate d anozone nonattainmen t area , the sourc e electe d resi n and cleanu

p solven t usag e limitation s t o limi t th e source' s emission s o f VO C t o syntheti c mino r status , les s than10 0 tpyo f VOC . Thes e limit s wer e incorporate d int o a nai r pollutio ncontro l permi t (Permi t #90-DAA-227) . Thi s permi t assume d a VO C emissio nfacto r o f 0. 8 pound s o f VO C emitte d pe r gallo n o f resi napplied . Late r i n199 2 th e sourc e found th e emissio nfacto r use d i n th e permi t ma yb e understating the source' s actua l VO C emissions . Anin-hous e stud yindicate d th e actua l VO C emission s t o b e possibl ya s higha s 1.3 2 pound s pe r gallo no f resi napplied . The olde r VO C emissio nlimitatio ni nPermi t 90

- DAA-22 7 coul d no t b e met . The sourc e propose d t o chang e the VO C emissio n limitatio n t o 1.5 0 pound s o f VO C pe r gallo no f resi napplied . Ultimately , a n emissio nlimitation , o r factor , o f 1.3 5 pound s o f VO C pe r gallo no f resi n applie d wa s adopted . A t th e same time th e ne wemissio nlimitatio nwa s bein g change d fro

m0. 8 t o 1.3 5 pound s o f VO C pe r gallo no f resi napplied , th e sourc e submitte d a permi t applicatio nt o remove severa l existing emissio nunit s (tw o pultrusio n line s and on e solven t degreaser ) and t o ad d a pilo t fiberglas s coating lin e (Proces s P36 ) an d the scree nprinting lin e (Proces s P35) . Th e sourc e propose d thisr'combination o f change s t o mak e the permi t 'revision ' " a mino r sourc e modification . I nall , the facility' s allowabl e emission s o f VO C increase d byles s tha n2 5 tp yan d the tota l allowabl e VO C emission s fo r th e facilit ywer e les s tha nlOOtpy . However , betwee nthe time th e permi t applicatio nwa s receive d and the newpermi t wa s issued , the majo r VO C sourc e threshol d leve l fo r Milwauke e Countywa s reduce d fro m10 0 tp

yt o 2 5 tpy . Th e facilit ycoul d n o longe r b e a syntheti c mino r source , i t wa s no wconsidere d a majo r VO C source . Th e sourc e stil l retaine d thei r originall ypropose d limitation s i nth e permi t applicationt o keep th e permi t revisio na mino r modificatio no f a majo r sourc e (les s thana 2 5 tpyincreas e i nallowabl e VO C emissions) . Sinc e th e purpos e o f the electe d limitation s i nPermi t 92-DAA-29 6 wa s t o avoi d makin g th e additio no f the scree nprinting an d pilo t fiberglas s coating lin e a majo r modificatio no f a majo r source , thes e condition s remai n applicabl e and mus t b e carrie d ove r int o th e ne wpermit . Unde r s . N R 407.09(2)(d) , Wis . Adm . Code , an ypermi t issue d t o a stationar ysourc e tha t ha s anexisting ai r pollutio ncontro l permi t mus t hav e provision s i nth e ne w Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 1 3 

# 2*>P.2 7

permi t consisten t wit hth e origina l conditions , a s lon g a s th e condition s i n th e olde r permi t ar e stil l applicabl e t o th e source . Th e origina l permi t condition s i nPermi t #92-DAA-29 6 ar e summarize d below . O'Har e Fiberglas s Coatin g Lin e (Proces s P30 ) 1 ) Th e VO C conten t o f anycoatin g (resin ) use d ma yno t excee d 1.3 5 pound s pe r gallon , les s water . 2 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f resin s ma yno t excee d 12,00 0 gallons , average d ove r th e thre e mos t recen t consecutiv e calenda r months . 3 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f cleanu p solven t ma yno t excee d 20 0 pounds . O'Har e Pilo t Fiberglas s Coatin g Lin e (Proces s P36 ) 1 ) Th e VO C conten t o f an ycoatin g (resin ) use d ma yno t excee d 1.3 5 pound s pe r gallon , les s water . 2 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f resin s ma yno t excee d 2 2 gallons . 3 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f cleanu p solven t ma yno t excee d 10 0 pounds . Scree nprintin g Pres s (Proces s P35 ) 1 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f in k ma yno t excee d 3 gallons . 2 ) Th e dail yusag e o f in k ma yno t excee d 2 gallons . 3 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f cleanu p solven t ma yno t excee d 3 gallons . Sinc e Permi t 92-DAA-29 6 wa s issued , th e pilot fiberglas s coatin g lin e (Proces s P36 ) ha s bee nremoved . Becaus e th e pilo t fiberglas s line' s allowabl e VO C emission s wer e use d whe ndeterminin g an d establishin g th e existin g permi t conditions , it s allowabl e VO C emission s ma yb e transferre d ove r t o th e remainin g unit s without changin g th e origina l basi s fo r issuin g Permi t 92-DAA

296 . I nothe r words , th e usag e limitation s fo r th e O'Har e fiberglas s coatin g lin e and/o r scree nprintin g lin e ma yb e increased . Th e increas e i n allowabl e VO C emission s ma yno t excee d th e amoun t allowe d unde r Permi t 92-DAA-296 , o r 13 0 pound s o f VO C pe r mont h[2 2 gal/mo n x1.3 5 lbsVOC/ga l (Resin ) + 10 0 lbsVOC/mo n (Cleanup ) = 13 0 lbs/month] . Th e sourc e elect s t o increas e thei r allowabl e VO C emission s fro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s o n th e fiberglas s coatin g lin e b y13 0 pound s o f VO C pe r month . I n addition , th e sourc e request s th e condition s regardin g th e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s b e change d fro mpound s use d t o pound s o f VO C used . Th e sourc e presentl yuse s acetone , a non-VO C solvent"", " a s a cleanu p solven t an d feel s th e curren t wordin g o f th e conditio n unfairl ypenalize s them . I nadditio nt o th e usag e limitations , th e VO C emissio n limitatio n fro mPermi t 92-DAA-296 , limitin g th e allowabl e amoun t o f VO C tha t ca n b e emitte d pe r gallo no f resi napplied , mus t b e carrie d ove r int o th e ne wpermit . Th e fiberglas s coatin g line' s usag e o f coatin g resin s i s als o subjec t t o a RAC T emissio nlimitatio ni ns . NR422.08(2)(a) , Wis . Adm . Code . Unde r thi s section , a fabri c coatin g lin e ma yno t emi t VOC s i n exces s o f 2. 9 pound s o f gallon , excludin g water , delivere d t o eac happlicator . Thi s emissio n limi t i s no t a s restrictiv e a s th e permi t emissio n limitatio n bein g carrie d ove r (1.3 5 pound s o f VO C emissio npe r gallo n o f coatin g (resin) , excludin g water , a s applied ) fro mPermi t 92-DAA-296 . But th e mor e restrictiv e permi t limitatio n mus t b e carrie d over . A t th e tim e thi s emissio n limitatio n wa s elected , th e compan yelecte d a mor e restrictiv e emissio n limitatio n t o kee p th e additio no f th e ne wlin e a mino r modificatio n t o a majo r source . Unde r s . 144.394(7) , Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 1 4



# X 0P.2 8

Wis . Stats. , th e permitte e i s allowe d t o elec t mor e stringen t emissio n limitation s tha notherwis e required . Sinc e thi s electio n wa s mad e a s par t o f Permi t 92-DAA-296 , it mus t b e carrie d ove r int o thi s permit . Th e onl yothe r significan t VO C emissio n sourc e a t th e facilit yi s th e scree n printin g operatio n(Proces s P35) . Th e proces s lin e wa s relocate d t o thi s facilit yfro mthei r Glendal e facility . Th e uni t i s rarel yused . Becaus e o f it s lo wutilization , th e sourc e electe d rathe r restrictiv e ra wmateria l usag e limitation s t o exemp t th e uni t fro mChapte r N R424 , Wis . Adm . Code , emissio n limitation s an d t o allo wit s relocatio n t o b e permitte d a s a mino r modificatio nt o a majo r sourc e (Permi t 92-DAA-296) . Becaus e permi t 92-DAA-29 6 i s stil l i neffec t an d th e limit s ar e stil l applicable , th e permi t conditions , o r monthl yusag e limits , mus t b e carrie d ove r int o thi s permit . Th e condition s i nPermit 92-DAA-296 , pertainin g t o th e scree n printin g unit , ar e a s follows : Scree nPres s SP- 5 (Proces s P35 ) 1 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f in k ma yno t excee d 3 gallon s pe r month . 2 ) Th e monthl yusag e o f cleanu p solven t ma yno t excee d 3 gallon s pe r month . 3 ) Th e dail yusag e o f in k ma yno t excee d 2 gallon s pe r day . Again , som e mino r revision s t o thes e permi t condition s ar e bein g mad e i nthi s permit . First , th e monthl ylimi t o n th e usag e o f in k i s bein g change d t o rea d 3. 0 gallons , excludin g water , a s applied . Thi s chang e i s bein g mad e s o th e sourc e i s no t penalize d fo r usin g water-base d ink s an d t o insur e th e usag e o f thinnin g an d retardin g agent s i s included . Second , th e categor yo f in k i s bein g expande d t o rea d inks , coatings , thinnin g solvents , an d retardin g agents . Third , th e conditio nregardin g th e usag e o f cleanu p solven t i s bein g change d fro ma gallo nlimit t o pound s o f VO C use d limit . Th e ne wVO C usag e limi t wil l b e 2 1 pound s pe r mont h[ 3 gal/mo n x7.1 6 lbsVOC/ga l = 2 1 lbsVOC/mon] . Thi s way , th e sourc e i s not penalize d fo r usin g non-VO C cleanin g solvent s o r water-base d cleanin g solvents . I n th e ol d permit , th e 2-gallo n coatin g limit wa s electe d b yth e sourc e s o it s dail yVO C emissio n neve r exceede d 1 5 pound s pe r day . B ykeepin g th e scree n printin g line' s actua l VO C emission s belo w1 5 pound s pe r day , th e proces s lin e remain s exemp t fro mth e emissio nlimitation s o f s . N R424.03(2) , Wis . Adm . Code , unde r s . N R 424.03(1)(a)4 , Wis . Adm . Code . Instead , th e uni t i s subjec t t o th e genera l VO C emissio nlimitatio ngive ni n s . N R419.03 , Wis . Adm . Code . A s written , th e 2-gallo nlimi t o nth e usag e o f in k i s insufficien t t o insur e no t mor e tha n 1 5 pound s o f VOC,i s emitted . Sinc e th e exemptio n fro mChapte r N R424 , Wis . Adm . Code , i s base d o nactua l emissions , limitin g th e source' s dail yPT E doesn't see mt o mak e muc hsense . Eithe r way , th e sourc e i s require d t o maintai n daily " record s demonstrating ' thei r actua l emission s o f VOCs " af e less " tha n1 5 pounds . Ther e isn' t anycompellin g reaso n t o maintai n th e dail ylimi t o f 2 gallon s o f ink . Thi s conditio n wil l not b e carrie d ove r int o th e ne w permit . Combined , th e fiberglas s coatin g lin e (Proces s P30 ) an d th e scree n printin g lin e (Proces s P35 ) hav e a PT E VO C o f 16,57 0 pound s pe r month , o r 99. 4 tpy . Sinc e th e facilit yi s locate d i n a n are a whic hi s designate d a sever e ozon e nonattainmen t are a (Milwauke e County) , th e majo r sourc e threshol d leve l i s 2 5 tpy,o f VOC . Th e facilit yi s a majo r Part-7 0 source . Summarize d belo wi n Tabl e 5 ar e th e PT E VO C estimate s fo r thes e tw o units .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 1 5



# 21P.2 9

Tabl e 5 Potentia l t o Emi t Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOCs ) Fiberglas s Coating (Proces s P30 ) Operatio n Resi n Cleanu p Solven t Monthl y Usag e Limi t 12,00 0 gal s 33 0 lb s Scree nPrinting (Proces s P35) : Operatio n Ink , Retarder , Thinning Cleanu p Solven t Monthl y Usag e Limi t 3. 0 gal s 3. 0 gal s Maximu

m VO C Conten t 1.3 5 lbsVOC/ga l 1.0 0 lbsVOC/l b Subtota l VO C Emission s

(lbs/month ) (£gy ) 16,20 0 97. 2 22 Q ___L_

£

. 16,53 0 99. 2

Maximu m VO C Conten t 6.6 0 lbsVOC/ga l 7.1 6 lbsVOC/ga l Subtota l VO C Emission s

(lbs/month ) (£py ) 19. 8 0.1 2 2JLu_ t __IZ

. . . 41. 2 0.2 4 Tota l 16,57 0 99. 4 Th e facilit ywa s no t modele d fo r th e emissio no f VOC . VO C i s no t normall y modele d b

yth e department . Instead , th e departmen t relie s upo nth e code , o r VO C emissio nlimitations , t o protec t th e ambien t ai r qualit ystandards . Hazardou s Ai r Pollutant s (HAPs ) Base d upo nth e informatio ncontaine d i nth e permi t applicatio n(Se e Tabl e 1) , the facilit yi s significan t fo r the emissio no f onl yon e HAP , styrene . Styren e i s bot ha federa l and stat e HAP . Assuming th e wors t cas e situation , al l VO C emitte d fro mth e resi nuse d o nfiberglas s coating lin e (Proces s P30 ) i s styrene , th e facilit yha s the PT E 16,20 0 pound s pe r mont ho f styrene , o r 97. 2 tpy . Base d upo nit s PT E styrene , th e facilit yi s a majo r sourc e fo r th e emissio no f federa l HAPs . The threshol d leve l fo r a majo r sourc e i s 1 0 tpyo f a singl e federa l HAP . Althoughth e sourc e elect s t o limi t thei r usag e o f styren e resin s o na monthl ybasis , th e facilit ystil l ha s th e capabilit yt o emi t styren e a t it s MT E rat e o nanhourl ybasis . A s summarize d i nTabl e 4 , th e facilit yha s a nMT E o f 66. 0 pound s o f VO C pe r hou r during th e coating and curing o f resins . Assumin g al l VO C i s emitte d a s styren e monomer , th e facilit yha s th e capabilit yt o emi t 66. 0 pound s o f styren e pe r hour . Th e ai r emission s fro

mth e fiberglas s coating lin e ar e exhauste d t o th e outsid e ambien t ai r throughthre e fixe d stacks . Al l stack s ar e greate r tha n2 5 fee t i nheight . Styren e i s liste d a s a Chapte r N R445 , Tabl e 1 , Wis . Adm . Code , ai r contaminant s wit ha d e minimu s leve l o f 75.19 2 pound s pe r hou r fro ma stac k greate r thano r equa l t o 2 5 fee t i nheight . Sinc e th e facility' s MT E fo r styren e i s d e minimu s leve l publishe d i nChapte r NR445 , Tabl e 1 , Wis . Adm . Code , th e facilitydoe s ho t heedt o b e modele d fo r th e emissio no f styrene . Therefore , n o modelin g o r usag e restriction s apply . Sinc e n o applicabl e restriction s o r limitation s exist , o r ar e required , fo r th e emissio no f styrene , styren e doe s no t nee d t o b e mentione d i nPar t I o f th e permit . CONTRO L TECHNOLOG

YREVIE W Th e facilit yemploy s a Tori t Downfl o systemt o contro l th e emissio no f particulate s fromthe stac k exhausting th e finishing operation s emission s (proces s P33) . The systemcontain s twelv e (12 ) fabri c filte r cartridges . Eac hcartridg e i s sequentiall ypulse d wit hcompresse d ai r t o remov e the particulat e filte r cak e buildup . Th e collectio nefficienc yo f th e hoo d system i s reporte d a s 7 0 percent , whil e the contro l devic e i s reporte d a s 99. 9 percen t efficient . Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 1 6



# JttP.3 0

I nadditio nt o th e particulat e contro l device , th e facilit yelect s usag e limitation s and emissio nlimitation s t o contro l thei r VO C emissions . Wit h thes e limitations , th e sourc e reduce s thei r MT E o f VO C from27 3 tpyt o a PT E VO C t o 99. 4 tpy . AI ROUALITYREVIE

W Th e facilit yi s significan t fo r the emissio no f PM , VOC , an d on e HAP , styrene . I t i s departmenta l polic yno t t o mode l PMan d VOC . Instead th e facilit y relie s upo nth e emissio nlimitatio ni nth e administrativ e cod e t o protec t th e ambien t ai r qualit ystandards . A s fo r styrene , th e facilit yha s anMT E belo w th e d e minimu s leve l publishe d i nChapte r N R445 , Tabl e 1 , Wis . Adm . Code . Ai r contaminant s wit ha nMT E belo wth e publishe d threshol d value s ar e no t typicall ymodeled . Th e ambien t ai r qualit ystandard s ar e assume d t o b e protected . FACILITYEMISSION S Actua l emission s ar e th e tota l emission s generate d b yth e emissio nsource s identifie d belo wove r th e specifie d time perio d taking int o accoun t an y reduction s mad e bya contro l devic e o r technique . Maximu mtheoretica l emission s ar e th e quantit yo f ai r contaminant s tha t theoreticall ycoul d b e emitte d b

yth e emission s source s identifie d below , withou t considering emissio ncontro l devices , base d o nth e designcapacit yo f th e source . Potentia l t o emi t i s th e maximu mcapacit yo f the emissio nsource s identifie d belo wt o emi t an

yai r contaminan t unde r it s physica l an d operationa l design . Anyphysica l o r operationa l limitatio no nth e capacit yo f a sourc e t o emi t a n ai r contaminan t shal l b e treate d a s par t o f it s desig ni f th e limitatio ni s Federall yenforceable . A . STAC K EMISSION S 1 . Stac k # , Uni t # : SI O P3 0 Uni t description : Th e styren e resi ncoating o f wove nfiberglass . Th e lin e i s equippe d wit ha heating tan k fo r the resin , an applicato r head , an d a curing oven . Th e lin e i s identifie d internall ya s th e O'Har e proces s line . Pollutan t Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOCs ) Actua l Emission s 60. 3 Unit s lb/hr TP Y

45. 2 Maximu

mTheoretica l

66. 0 Unit s lb/hr TP Y

26 4 P.T.E .

TP Y 99. 2

HAZARDOU S AI RPOLLUTAN T EMISSION S FORSTACK : SI O Pollutan t

Styrene , monome r 100-42- 5 Actua l

Emission s 60. 3 Unit s

lb/hr Maximu m Theoretica l

66. 0 Unit s

lb/hr Potentia l t o Emi t

TP Y 97. 2

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 1 7



# MP.3 1

2 . Stac k # , Uni t # : S1 4 P3 3 Uni t description : Miscellaneou s finishing operations : on e single-spindl e dril l press , two multi-spindl e dril l presses , on e roun d corne r router , on e shaping router , and tw o bel t sanders . Pollutan t Particulat e Matte r (PM ) Actua l Emission s 0.4 5 Unit s lb/hr TP Y

0.4 3 Maximu

mTheoretica l

5.8 0 Unit s lb/hr TP Y

16. 6 P.T.E .

TPY 2.6 3

3 . Stac k # , Uni t # : S3 0 P3 5 Uni t description : SP- 5 shee t fed scree nprinting pres s wit ha curing oven . Pollutan t Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOCs ) Actua l Emission s
2.5 6 Unit s lb/hr TP Y

0.0 4 Maximu

mTheoretica l

3.5 8 Unit s lb/hr TP Y

9.1 7 P.T.E .

TP Y 0.2 4

HAZARDOU S AI RPOLLUTAN T EMISSION S FORSTACK : S1 0 P1 3 Pollutan t

Ethy l Benzen e 100-41- 4 Toluen e 108-88- 3 Xylen e 1330-20- 7 Actua l

Emission s 0.0 2 1.3 1 0.2 5 Unit s

lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr Maximu m Theoretica l

0.0 4 2.1 8 0.2 9 Unit s

lb/yr lb/hr lb/hr Potentia l t o Emi t

TP Y 0.00 1 0.07 8 0.01 0

B . Facilit yEmission s Pollutan t Particulat e Matte r (PM ) Volatil e Organi c Compound s (VOCs ) Actua l Emission s TPY 0.4 3 45. 2 Potentia l t o Emi t TP Y 2.6 3 99. 4

Tota l Facilit yHazardou s Ai r Pollutan t Emission s Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 1 8 

# J?)P.3 2

Pollutan t

Ethy l Benzen e 100-41- 4 Styrene , monome r 100-42- 5 Toluen e 108-88- 3 Xylen e 1330-20- 7 Actua l Emission s
0.0 2 60. 3

1.3 1

0.2 5 Unit s

lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr Maximu

m Theoretica l

0.0 4 66. 0

2.1 8

0.2 9 Unit s

lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr lb/hr P.T. E

TP Y 0.0 0 97. 2

0.0 8

0.0 1 Threshol d Valu e

36.22 8 75.19 2 912,63 6 31.23 1 84,15 7 0.208 2 Unit s

lb/hr lb/hr lb/yr lb/hr lb/yr lb/hr

FACILITYSTATUS UNDERPART 7 0 Th e facility , eve nwit hth e limitatio ncarrie d ove r fromanexisting permi t (92-DAA-296) , ha s a PT E o f 99. 4 tpyo f VO C an d 97. 2 o f styrene , a federa l HAP . Th e threshol d value s fo r a facilitylocate d i nMilwauke e Count yar e 2 5 tpyo f VO C and 1 0 tpyo f an ysingl e federa l HAP . Th e sourc e i s a majo r source , and mus t b e permitte d a s a major , Part-7 0 source . COMPLIANC E DEMONSTRATIO N MONITORIN

GMETHOD S T o demonstrat e compliance , the sourc e mus t submi t t o th e departmen t semi

annua l monitoring reports . The time period s covere d b ythes e report s ar e January1 t o Jun e 3 0 and Jul y1 t o Decembe r 31 . Th e summaryreport s mus t b e submitte d withi n4 5 day s fromthe en d o f eac hreporting period . Th e report s mus t b e signe d b

yth e responsibl e officia l a s t o th e truth , accuracy , and completenes s o f eac hreport . Th e monitoring result s mus t summariz e the following items : 1 ) Th e name s o f th e resin s delivere d t o the O'Har e lin e applicato r pe r mont h an d th e VO C emissio nrate s o f thes e resin s i nunit s o f pound s o f VO C pe r gallon , excluding water , emitte d during thei r applicatio nan d cure . 2 ) Th e monthl yvolume and the monthl yvolume average d ove r th e mos t recen t 3 consecutiv e month s o f al l resin s delivere d t o th e O'Har e lin e applicato r pe r mont hi nunit s o f gallons , excluding water . 3 ) Th e tota l monthl yweigh t o f VO C use d pe r mont hfro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s t o cleanth e O'Har e proces s lin e i nunit s o f pounds . 4 ) Astatemen t stating tha t the exhaus t collectio nan d th e particulat e contro l device s wer e operate d wheneve r an yequipmen t describe d b yproces s P3 3 (e.g. , 1 corne r router , 1 surfac e router , 1 single-spindl e dril l press , 2 multi-spindl e dril l presses , an d 2 bel t sanders ) wa s use d an d tha t the pressur e dro p acros s th e particulat e collectio ndevic e wa s measure d an d recorde d a t a minimu mo f onc e ever

yeigh t (8 ) hour s o f operatio no r onc e pe r day , whicheve r yielde d th e greate r numbe r o f measurements . 5 ) Th e name s o f al l inks , coatings , thinning solvents , an d retarding agent s delivere d t o the scree npres s pe r month , the VO C conten t o f thes e material s i n Augus t 27 , 199 6 Page 1 9

^ )P.3 3

unit s o f pound s o f VO C pe r gallon , excludin g water , a s used , an d th e monthl y tota l volum e o r weight o f eac hmateria l use d pe r mont hi n unit s o f gallons , excludin g water . I f a weigh t measuremen t i s use d t o recor d usage , th e densit y o f th e materia l mus t b e recorded . 6 ) Th e tota l monthl yvolum e o f al l inks , coatings , thinnin g solvents , an d retardin g agent s delivere d t o th e scree n printin g pres s pe r mont hi n unit s o f gallons , excludin g water . 7 ) Th e tota l monthl yweight o f VO C use d pe r mont hfro mth e usag e o f cleanu p solvent s t o clea nth e printin g pres s an d screens . Al l record s shal l b e maintaine d fo r at least th e previou s fiv e year s an d b e availabl e t o th e departmen t fo r inspectio n upo n request . I naddition , th e sourc e mus t submit t o th e departmen t an d USEP Aannua l complianc e certificatio nreports . Th e tim e perio d covere d b yeac hrepor t i s Januar y1 t o Decembe r 31 . Complianc e certificatio n mus t b e submitte d withi n 4 5 day s fro mth e en d o f eac hreportin g period . Eac hrepor t mus t b e signe d b y th e responsibl e officia l a s t o th e truth , accuracy , ah d completenes s o f eac h report . FACILIT YCOMPLIANC E STATU S Th e Departmen t find s that : 1 . Th e sourc e wil l mee t applicabl e emissio n limit s an d othe r requirements . 2 . Th e sourc e wil l no t caus e no r exacerbat e a violatio n o f a n ambien t ai r qualit ystandar d o r ambien t ai r increment . PRELIMINAR YDETERMINATIO N Th e Wisconsi nDepartmen t o f Natura l Resource s ha s reviewe d th e permi t applicatio nan d othe r material s submitte d b yBrad yU.S.A . an d hereb ymake s a preliminar ydeterminatio ntha t a n operatio n permi t ma yb e issue d wit hth e followin g Draft Applicabl e Limit s an d Draf t Permi t Conditions .

Augus t 27 , 199 6 Pag e 2 0



# ?a