alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-30888 Conference Calendar

__________________ NOBLE MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DUNCAN S. KEMP; JEFFERSON D. HUGHES, Criminal Judge; JAMES F. KUHN, Judge; PAT DUNN; CLARA E. TOOMBS; SCOTT SLEDGE; JOHN J. DAHMER; CYNTHIA JOHNSON; MICHAEL PAWLUS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-93-2359-H

- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Noble Marshall appeals from the district court's denial of his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. On appeal, Marshall can present no legal points arguable on their merits, and the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King ,No. 95-30888 -2- 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution Marshall that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Marshall is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED.
### §908. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title VII, §707, as added Jan. 2, 1968, Pub. L. 90–248, title IV, §401, 81 Stat. 930, related to grants for expansion and development of undergraduate and graduate programs in the fiscal year ending June 30, 1969, and each of the three succeeding fiscal years.
§ 203.26 Mortgagor's payments when mortgage is executed. ( a ) The mortgagor must pay to the mortgagee, upon execution of the mortgage, a sum that will be sufficient to pay the ground rents, if any, the estimated taxes, special assessments, flood insurance premiums, if required, and fire and other hazard insurance premiums for the period beginning on the last date on which each such charge would have been paid under the normal lending practices of the lender and local custom (if each such date constitutes prudent lending practice), and ending on the due date of the first full installment payment under the mortgage, plus an amount sufficient to pay the mortgage insurance premium from the date of closing the loan to the date of the first monthly payment under the mortgage or, where applicable, the one-time mortgage insurance premium payable pursuant to § 203.280.
( b ) The mortgagee may also collect from the mortgagor a sum not exceeding one-sixth of the estimated total amount of such taxes, special assessments, insurance premiums and other charges to be paid during the ensuing 12-month period.
[41 FR 49734, Nov. 10, 1976, as amended at 48 FR 28804, June 23, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2800 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2800

 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2005

  Mr. Castle introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the 
                ``Senator William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE.

     The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in 
the State of Delaware is designated as the ``Senator William V. Roth, 
Jr. Bridge''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

     Any reference in a law (including regulations), map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge described in 
section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the Senator William 
V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 203.458 Termination by prepayment of loan.

The contract of insurance shall be terminated if the loan is paid in full prior to its maturity.
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

CASTELLUCCI,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

 THOMAS EDWARDS CONSTRUCTION

AND DESIGN ET AL,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-01012 MEJ

ORDER VACATING ADR

REFERRAL

ORDER SCHEDULING

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

ORDER RE: PRESIDING JUDGE

On January 28, 2010, the Court referred the parties in the above-captioned matter to the ADR

Department to participate in a further mediation regarding Plaintiff’s pending motion to enforce

settlement. (Dkt. #26.) However, Plaintiff’s counsel has since informed the Court that Plaintiff will

only participate in a settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate judge. Accordingly,

the Court hereby VACATES the January 28, 2010 mediation referral. 

Instead, the Court hereby ORDERS the parties to appear for a settlement conference on

February 5, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. in Judge James’ CHAMBERS, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate

Avenue, San Francisco, California. On the date of the settlement conference, counsel and parties

shall use the intercom adjacent to chambers' security entrance to notify the Court of their arrival.

Settlement Conference statements shall be submitted by February 2, 2010, and in accordance with

Magistrate Judge James' Standing Order Re: Settlement Conference Procedures, a copy of which

may be obtained from the Northern District of California's website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/. 

From the homepage, click on the "Judges" tab on the left margin, then choose Magistrate Judge

James. The parties’ statements need only address the present dispute.

Case 3:09-cv-01012-MEJ Document 28 Filed 01/28/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

Finally, because the undersigned is the presiding judge in this matter, the Court hereby

ORDERS the parties to each file a statement waiving any objection whatsoever to Magistrate Judge

Maria-Elena James serving as a mediator in this case while also remaining the presiding judge. The

parties shall file their waivers by February 2, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 28, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-01012-MEJ Document 28 Filed 01/28/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Rosario, Appellant.

[717 NYS2d 125]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered January 11, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7V2 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The challenged portions of the prosecutor’s summation did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial *(see, People v D'Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *lv denied*81 NY2d 884). *170While the prosecutor’s comments concerning a stipulation could have been better articulated, they were not misleading *(compare, People v Olivero,*272 AD2d 174). In context, the mention of the stipulation clearly referred to the absence of any dispute that the glassine envelope in evidence contained heroin, and had no reasonable possibility of misleading the jury into believing that the stipulation meant anything more.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSkin-stiffener interface stresses in composite stiffened panelsA model and solution method for determining the normal and shear stresses in the interface between the skin and the stiffener attached flange were developed. An efficient, analytical solution procedure was developed and incorporated in a sizing code for stiffened panels. The analysis procedure described provides a means to study the effects of material and geometric design parameters on the interface stresses. These stresses include the normal stress, and the shear stresses in both the longitudinal and the transverse directions. The tendency toward skin/stiffener separation may therefore be minimized by choosing appropriate values for the design variables. The most important design variables include the relative bending stiffnesses of the skin and stiffener attached flange, the bending stiffness of the stiffener web, and the flange width. The longitudinal compressive loads in the flange and skin have significant effects on the interface stresses.Document ID19840010613Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWang, J. T. S.*(Lockheed-Georgia Co. Marietta, GA, United States)*Biggers, S. B.*(Lockheed-Georgia Co. Marietta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:172261NASA-CR-172261Accession Number84N18681Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-15949Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010613.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## EFED Label Data Report (Active Ingredient) Ingredient: MCPB, Sodium Salt (019202) Current As Of Date : 8/26/2013 NDC - No Dosage Conversion ; NS - Not Specified

**Site Desc Use Group** 

**Desc Reg#**  **LUIS Accepted**  **Date AI%**  **Formulation Desc**  **Product Name Product**  **Max App Rate**  **A. I. Max**

**App Rate Max #** 

**Apps / CC Product** 

**Seasonal Max**  **Dose/Year A. I. Conv** 

**Seasonal Max**  **Dose/Year Product** 

**Seasonal Max**  **Dose/CC A. I.** 

**Seasonal Max**  **Dose/CC Max #** 

**Apps / Unit of Time**  **Minimum**

**Retreatment Interval**  **Rentry**

**Interval Application** 

**Method Type Application** 

**Method Equipment**  **Application**

**Method Timing Incorporatio** 

**n Depth Buffer** 

**Restriction Disallowed** 

**Geo Areas Allowable** 

**Geo Areas Soil** 

**Factor Percent** 

**Organic Matter** 

MINT TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 2 pt/ 1 a .54079375 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Aircraft. Early

MINT TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 2 pt/ 1 a .54079375 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Aircraft. Fall.

MINT TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 2 pt/ 1 a .54079375 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Aircraft. Spring.

MINT TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 2 pt/ 1 a .54079375 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Ground. Early

MINT TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 2 pt/ 1 a .54079375 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Ground. Fall.

MINT TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 2 pt/ 1 a .54079375 NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Ground. Spring.

PEAS, FIELD TERRESTRI 15440- 11/6/2008 23.5 EC SODIUM MCPB 6 pt/ 1 a 1.61795738NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 12 hr Spray. Aircraft. Postemergenc

PEAS, FIELD TERRESTRI 15440- 11/6/2008 23.5 EC SODIUM MCPB 6 pt/ 1 a 1.61795738NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 12 hr Spray. Ground. Postemergenc

PEAS, FIELD TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 6 pt/ 1 a 1.62238125NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Aircraft. Postemergenc

PEAS, FIELD TERRESTRI71368-512/5/2012 23.5 EC THISTROL 6 pt/ 1 a 1.62238125NS NS NS NS NS NS NS 24 hr Spray. Ground. Postemergenc



## Page 1 of 2

## Page 2 of 2
No. 99-40916 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40916 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ALONSO GARZA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-99-CR-229-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Alonso Garza-Gonzalez (Garza) has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Garza has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
§ 244.251 Cross-reference. ( a ) All of the provisions, except § 207.258b, of part 207, subpart B of this chapter relating to mortgages insured under section 207 of the National Housing Act apply to a mortgage covering a group practice facility insured under title XI of the National Housing Act.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart all references in part 207 of this chapter to section 207 of the Act shall be construed to refer to title XI of the Act.
( c ) All of the definitions in § 244.1 shall apply to this subpart. In addition as used in this part, the term *contract of insurance* means the agreement evidenced by the Commissioner's insurance endorsement and includes the provisions of this subpart and of the Act.
[36 FR 24663, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 50 FR 38787, Sept. 25, 1985]
### §§1411 to 1418. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 1411 to 1418 of this title, which related to the classification of lands to provide for disposal or interim management, were omitted pursuant to section 1418 of this title which terminated this authority.

Section 1411, Pub. L. 88–607, §1, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 986, authorized Secretary of the Interior to classify lands for purpose of disposal or retention.

Section 1412, Pub. L. 88–607, §2, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 986, related to publication of notice by Secretary.

Section 1413, Pub. L. 88–607, §3, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 986, related to development and administration of lands for multiple use and sustained yield.

Section 1414, Pub. L. 88–607, §4, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 987, related to exemption of lands from other forms of disposal for certain period of time.

Section 1415, Pub. L. 88–607, §5, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 987, related to definitions.

Section 1416, Pub. L. 88–607, §6, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 988, related to supplemental legislation and provided that this subchapter not be construed as repealing any existing laws.

Section 1417, Pub. L. 88–607, §7, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 988, related to restrictions.

Section 1418, Pub. L. 88–607, §8, Sept. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 988; Pub. L. 90–213, §2, Dec. 18, 1967, 81 Stat. 660, provided that the authorizations and requirements of this subchapter expire six months after the final report of the Public Land Law Review Commission, which report was to be submitted not later than June 30, 1970.
### SUBCHAPTER XXIV—CROOKED RIVER PROJECT, OREGON
#### In the Matter of Frank Napoleoni, Appellant, v Howard Safir, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

[717 NYS2d 120]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered September 24, 1999, dismissing the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner as a New York City police officer and to grant a name-clearing *180hearing, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting a name-clearing hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, a New York City police officer, entered into a plea agreement with respondent in settlement of disciplinary charges, which alleged that he had made false statements in connection with an official investigation into his conduct. Pursuant to the agreement, entered into by petitioner upon the advice of counsel, petitioner was, *inter alia,*placed on probationary status and accordingly was not subsequently entitled to a pretermination hearing under Civil Service Law § 75 *(see, Misir v New York City Hous. Auth.,*245 AD2d 88, *appeal dismissed*92 NY2d 915; *Matter of Rogers v City of New York Dept. of Correction,*193 AD2d 506, *lv dismissed*82 NY2d 820). In addition, given his probationary status, petitioner remained subject to dismissal for conduct occurring before the execution of the plea agreement *(see, Matter of Garrett v Safir,*253 AD2d 700, *lv denied*92 NY2d 817; *Matter of Prestia v Brown,*191 AD2d 224).

Petitioner’s claim that he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive the right to a hearing for conduct predating the execution of his plea agreement is unavailing because the plea agreement was executed by him upon the advice of his attorney *(see, Matter of Simpson v Abate,*213 AD2d 190).

Petitioner, however, is entitled to a name-clearing hearing because the government’s allegations, if untrue as petitioner alleges, were defamatory, he lost his employment, and there was dissemination of material stigmatizing to him *(see, Matter of Swinton v Safir,*93 NY2d 758). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
<x High Savery Dam
SS MOU Area

se

S

BS

Saf

Ss
;

by
i

SS

Ss

ey
| ARS
ee

SS
SS

YY
SA
MS
SON
S \

\Q ws

Ly

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NO INTENDED BY BLM

Kilometers

0.5

nm

Miles

Map A23-1
High Savery Dam MOU
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2461 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2461

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain Kashmir 
                            (cashmere) hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

 Mr. Simmons introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain Kashmir 
                            (cashmere) hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN KASHMIR (CASHMERE) HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.51.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain fine animal hair of 
Kashmir (cashmere) goats) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2





Report Of Independent

Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors

Structured Obligations Corporation

New York, New York



We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the
        Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended
        December 31, 2021. Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
        examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
        reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.



In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December
        31, 2021.



This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Certificate Holders of
        the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.







February 22, 2022



























---
§ 1008.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the Inter-American Foundation or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule [Agency-specific CFR citation] that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (*i.e.*, any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(2) of this section, this paragraph is not applicable for the Inter-American Foundation.
#### Richard K. Clark v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., et al.

. Motion to dispense with printing granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten record, without printing the same, but upon printed appellant’s points; the appellant to serve one copy of the typewritten record upon the attorneys for respondents and file six typewritten copies thereof together with the appellant’s printed points with this court, and on the further condition that the appeal be noticed foi argument for the same term as the appeal in *Goostree*v. *P. Lorillard Co.*Concur — Botein, P, J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-30T20:45:30-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office