alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9851. Political activities

#### (a) State or local agency

For purposes of chapter 15 of title 5, any agency which assumes responsibility for planning, developing, and coordinating Head Start programs and receives assistance under this subchapter shall be deemed to be a State or local agency. For purposes of clauses (1) and (2) of section 1502(a) of such title, any agency receiving assistance under this subchapter shall be deemed to be a State or local agency.

#### (b) Restrictions

#### (1) In general

A program assisted under this subchapter, and any individual employed by, or assigned to or in, a program assisted under this subchapter (during the hours in which such individual is working on behalf of such program), shall not engage in—

(A) any partisan or nonpartisan political activity or any other political activity associated with a candidate, or contending faction or group, in an election for public or party office; or

(B) any activity to provide voters or prospective voters with transportation to the polls or similar assistance in connection with any such election.

#### (2) Registration

No funds appropriated under this subchapter may be used to conduct voter registration activities. Nothing in this subchapter prohibits the availability of Head Start facilities during hours of operation for the use of any nonpartisan organization to increase the number of eligible citizens who register to vote in elections for Federal office.

#### (3) Rules and regulations

The Secretary, after consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, may issue rules and regulations to provide for the enforcement of this section, which may include provisions for summary suspension of assistance or other action necessary to permit enforcement on an emergency basis.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §656, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 508; Pub. L. 110–134, §24, Dec. 12, 2007, 121 Stat. 1443.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–134, §24(1), inserted heading.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 110–134, §24(2), added subsec. (b) and struck out former subsec. (b) which read as follows: "Programs assisted under this subchapter shall not be carried on in a manner involving the use of program funds, the provision of services, or the employment or assignment of personnel in a manner supporting or resulting in the identification of such programs with (1) any partisan or nonpartisan political activity or any other political activity associated with a candidate, or contending faction or group, in an election for public or party office; (2) any activity to provide voters or prospective voters with transportation to the polls or similar assistance in connection with any such election; or (3) any voter registration activity. The Secretary, after consultation with the Office of Personnel Management, shall issue rules and regulations to provide for the enforcement of this section, which shall include provisions for summary suspension of assistance or other action necessary to permit enforcement on an emergency basis."
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Arc  Communications  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2004,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned chief financial officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ Frank Elenio
-------------------------------
Frank Elenio
Chief Financial Officer
Arc Communications Inc.
May 17, 2004
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 195 ) IV-C-16

2 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:21:01 AM Sheet 195of 232UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y P. 2



### MA R21 198 9 

## E D l 11 ' 

## "nf i MA Y" S 198 9 EPAAI R DOCKE T Honorabl e Lloy

d Bentse n Unite d State s Senato r Washington , D C 2051 0 Dea r Senato r Bentsen : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r February17 , 198 9 lette r t o Administrato r Reill yrelaying th e concern s o f you r constituent , W . J . Buxto n regarding EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne wvehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . T o assis t yo u wit hunderstanding thi s matter , I hav e enclose d a cop yo f our proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposing onboar d controls . I n analyzing refueling emissio n controls , w e hav e thoroughl yexamine d th e issue s relate d t o bot honboar d an d Stag e I I controls , including the questio n o f th e phase-i n perio d fo r onboar d control s raise d b yW.J . Buxton' s letter . Whil e i t i s tru e tha t a substantia l time wil l b e require d t o completel yphas e i n suc hcontrols , i t i s als o th e cas e tha t 5 0 percen t o f al l gasolin e refueling woul d be controlle d withi n the firs t fiv e year s afte r implementation . I n addition , our analysi s show s that , althoughi n some case s Stag e I I control s can b e implemente d i n a shorte r time perio d tha n onboar d controls , th e greate r overal l efficienc yo f onboar d plu s the othe r advantage s describe d i n the proposa l outweighthe possibl e short-termadvantag e o f Stag e I I control s whe n viewe d a s a nationa l program . Pleas e b e assure d tha t w e hav e don e our bes t t o carefull y conside r th e view s represente d b yW.J . Buxton' s letter . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f the Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc hP. 3
-2
-

fro mW.J . Buxto n i n o plac e bot hyou r letf-J r I, Comi "ercia l

Enclosur e
c c : Docke t A-87-1 1 Sincerel yyours ,

- - tor --- 0 £ --" esource s
§ 521.19 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ may schedule prehearing conferences as appropriate.
( b ) Upon the motion of any party, the ALJ shall schedule at least one prehearing conference at a reasonable time in advance of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to discuss the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact or as to the contents and authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at an oral hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) Scheduling dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery;
( 9 ) The time and place for the hearing; and
( 10 ) Such other matters as may tend to expedite the fair and just disposition of the proceedings.
( d ) The ALJ shall issue an order containing all matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.
#### § 203.358 Direct conveyance of property.

In acquiring the property or conveying the property to the Commissioner the mortgagee may arrange for the deed to be made directly to the Commissioner from the mortgagor or other grantor. The mortgagee shall be responsible for determining that such conveyance will comply with all of the provisions of this part conveying good marketable title and satisfactory title evidence.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ David D. Wesselink
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David D. Wesselink
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            April 9, 2004
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York

corporation, and DOES 1 through 20,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

No. C 08-05445 WHA (Lead Case)

Consolidated with:

No. C 09-00471 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

ACCOUNTING DOCUMENTS

The Court has received a request from Attorney Doug Dexter of Farella Braun + Martel

on behalf of Mr. Minor’s accountant, Raymond Thornson, to retrieve the box of accounting

documents produced by Mr. Thornson and reviewed by the undersigned during trial. As soon as a

verdict is returned, Attorney Dexter may retrieve the box from chambers on the condition that the

documents be kept together and maintained for 28 days, after which the documents may be

disseminated. The box of documents will not include the handful of documents (WTAS334

through WTA342) pertaining to the April 7 balance sheet which the Court provided to counsel for

Christie’s Inc. during trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00471-WHA Document 34 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1
### §7385s–12. Maximum aggregate compensation

For each individual whose illness or death serves as the basis for compensation or benefits under this part, the total amount of compensation (other than medical benefits) paid under this part, to all persons, in the aggregate, on the basis of that illness or death shall not exceed $250,000.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3683], as added Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3161, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2184.)
(April 12, 1962)

#### Louis Napoli, as Administrator of the Estate of Mary Napoli, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. St. Peter’s Hospital of Brooklyn, New York, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion by appellants for a stay, pending *671appeal, granted, on condition that appellants perfect the appeal and he ready to argue or submit it on May 4, 1962; appeal ordered on the calendar for said date. The record and appellants’ brief must he served and filed on or before April 27, 1962. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 236 (Friday, December 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 73029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29685]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9006-4]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements.
Filed 11/26/2012 Through 11/30/2012.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at:http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.
    Supplementary Information: As of October 1, 2012, EPA will not 
accept paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions 
on or after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA.
    While this system eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies 
to EPA to meet filing requirements, electronic submission does not 
change requirements for distribution of EISs for public review and 
comment. To begin using e-NEPA, you must first register with 
EPA'selectronic reporting site--https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp.

EIS No. 20120374, Draft EIS, NOAA, 00, Amendment 5 to the Consolidated 
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan, Atlantic 
Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico, Comment Period Ends: 02/12/
2013, Contact: Peter Cooper 301-427-8503. Due to an oversight, the 
above document should have appeared in the 11/23/2012 FR Notice.
EIS No. 20120375, Draft EIS, FHWA, FL, U.S. 301 (State Road 200) CR 227 
to CR 233, Improvements, Bradford County, FL, Comment Period Ends: 01/
22/2013, Contact: Joseph Sullivan 850-553-2248.
EIS No. 20120376, Draft EIS, USFWS, AZ, Pima County Multi-Species 
Conservation Plan, Pima County, AZ, Comment Period Ends: 03/15/2013, 
Contact: Jeff Servoss 520-670-6150, ext. 231
EIS No. 20120377, Draft EIS, RUS, ND, Antelope Valley Station to Neset 
Transmission Project, Mercer, Dunn, Billings, Williams, McKenzie, and 
Mountrail Counties, ND, Comment Period Ends: 01/22/2013, Contact: 
Dennis Rankin 202-720-1953.
EIS No. 20120378, Draft EIS, USACE, OK, Eufaula Lake Shoreline 
Management Plan Revision and Master Plan Supplement, Pittsburg, 
McIntosh, Haskell, Latimer, Muskogee, and Okmulgee Counties, OK, 
Comment Period Ends: 01/22/2013, Contact: Jeff Knack 918-669-7666.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20120320, Draft EIS, FTA, MN, Southwest Transitway Construction 
and Operation Light Rail Transit, Hennepin County, MN, Comment Period 
Ends: 12/31/2012, Contact: Marisol Simon 312-353-2789.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 10/12/2012; Extending Comment 
Period from 12/11/2012 to 12/31/2012.

    Dated: December 4, 2012.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-29685 Filed 12-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                       1,104,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,389,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,866
<INVENTORY>                                  5,880,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,171,251
<PP&E>                                       6,361,561
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,702,019
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,844,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,080,668
<BONDS>                                      5,026,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,570
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,529,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,844,181
<SALES>                                     13,308,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,308,564
<CGS>                                        4,833,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,833,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,913,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (648,334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (273,281)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (375,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (375,053)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYNE GORDON, aka DWAYNE HAYES,

Plaintiff,

 v.

GREGORY AHERN, et. al.,

Defendant(s).

 /

No. C-09-1849 TEH (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On April 28, 2009, Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee housed

at the Santa Rita Jail (Alameda County) in Dublin, California, filed

a pro se civil rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that

Alameda County Sheriff’s Deputies violated his constitutional rights

by denying him access to the courts. Doc. #1. Following an order

of service, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on

December 4, 2009. Doc. #15. Upon his request, Plaintiff was

granted until March 4, 2010 to file his Opposition. Doc. ## 32 &

34. After no Opposition had been filed, on April 6, 2010, the Court

sua sponte granted Plaintiff until May 3, 2010 to file his

Opposition. Doc. #36. On April 13, 2010, the order granting

Case 3:09-cv-01849-TEH Document 39 Filed 07/02/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

Plaintiff an extension of time to file an Opposition was returned as

undeliverable. Doc. #37. To date, no Opposition has been filed,

nor has Plaintiff provided a notice of address change. 

Because more than sixty days have passed since the Court’s

mail to Plaintiff was returned, the action is DISMISSED without

prejudice under the authority of Civil Local Rule 3-11(b).

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions as moot and

close the file. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED 07/01/10 

THELTON E. HENDERSON

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\TEH\CR.09\Gordon-09-1849-order of dismissal-clr 3-11-b.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-01849-TEH Document 39 Filed 07/02/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 34.14 Request for an outside hearing for certain debts. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, an employee must file a request that is received by STATE not later than 30 calendar days from the date of STATE's notice described in § 34.13 if an employee wants an outside hearing pursuant to § 34.13(g)(2) concerning: ( 1 ) The existence or amount of the debt; or
( 2 ) STATE's proposed offset schedule.
( b ) The request must be signed by the employee and should identify and explain with reasonable specificity and brevity the facts, evidence and witnesses which the employee believes support his or her position. If the employee objects to the percentage of disposable pay to be deducted from each check, the request should state the objection and the reasons for it.
( c ) The employee must also specify whether an oral or paper hearing is requested. If an oral hearing is desired, the request should explain why the matter cannot be resolved by review of the documentary evidence alone.
( d ) If the employee files a request for an outside hearing later than the required 30 calendar days as described in paragraph (a) of this section, STATE may accept the request if the employee can show that the delay was because of circumstances beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive notice of the filing deadline (unless the employee has actual notice of the filing deadline).
( e ) An employee waives the right to an outside hearing and will have his or her pay offset if the employee fails to file a petition for a hearing as prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Clarence Stanley Baum.

— Motion for leave to prosecute appeal in 1962 *coram nobis*proceeding as a poor person, and for other relief, denied. Memorandum: Substantially all of the issues in this proceeding were recently passed upon by this court. *(People*
      *879v. *Baum,*15 A D 2d 863.) Reargument of motion for leave to prosecute appeal in 1959 *coram nobis*proceeding as poor person denied.
#### § 1000.156 Is affordable housing developed, acquired, or assisted under the IHBG program subject to limitations on cost or design standards?

Yes. Affordable housing must be of moderate design. For these purposes, moderate design is defined as housing that is of a size and with amenities consistent with unassisted housing offered for sale in the Indian tribe's general geographic area to buyers who are at or below the area median income. The local determination of moderate design applies to all housing assisted under an affordable housing activity, including development activities (*e.g.,* acquisition, new construction, reconstruction, moderate or substantial rehabilitation of affordable housing and homebuyer assistance) and model activities. Acquisition includes assistance to a family to buy housing. Units with the same number of bedrooms must be comparable with respect to size, cost and amenities.

[66 FR 49790, Sept. 28, 2001]