alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMission analysis of solar powered aircraftThe effect of a real mission scenario on a solar powered airplane configuration which had been developed in previous work were assessed. The mission used was surveillance of crop conditions over a route from Phoenix to Tucson to Tombstone, Arizona. Appendices are attached which address the applicability of existing platforms and payloads to do this mission.Document ID19850022759Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHall, D. W.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Watson, D. A.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Tuttle, R. P.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Hall, S. A.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Sunnyvale, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 30, 1985Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:172583NASA-CR-172583Accession Number85N31072Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-16975Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850022759.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Frey, Appellant, against Walter B. Martin, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

— Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Reargument of motion to prosecute appeal on original papers and handwritten briefs from order entered March 6, 1958 granted on court’s own motion, and upon reargument, motion granted.
### §6503. Transfer of jurisdiction, duties, property, etc., to Secretary of the Interior from Secretary of Navy

#### (a) Transfer of jurisdiction over reserve; date of transfer

Jurisdiction over the reserve shall be transferred by the Secretary of the Navy to the Secretary of the Interior on June 1, 1977.

#### (b) Protection of environmental, fish and wildlife, and historical or scenic values; promulgation of rules and regulations

With respect to any activities related to the protection of environmental, fish and wildlife, and historical or scenic values, the Secretary of the Interior shall assume all responsibilities as of April 5, 1976. As soon as possible, but not later than the effective date of transfer, the Secretary of the Interior may promulgate such rules and regulations as he deems necessary and appropriate for the protection of such values within the reserve.

#### (c) Contract responsibilities and functions

The Secretary of the Interior shall, upon the effective date of the transfer of the reserve, assume the responsibilities and functions of the Secretary of the Navy under any contracts which may be in effect with respect to activities within the reserve.

#### (d) Equipment, facilities, and other properties used in connection with operation of reserve; transfer without reimbursement

On the date of transfer of jurisdiction of the reserve, all equipment, facilities, and other property of the Department of the Navy used in connection with the operation of the reserve, including all records, maps, exhibits, and other informational data held by the Secretary of the Navy in connection with the reserve, shall be transferred without reimbursement from the Secretary of the Navy to the Secretary of the Interior who shall thereafter be authorized to use them to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

#### (e) Unexpended funds previously appropriated for use in connection with reserve and civilian personnel ceilings assigned to management and operation of reserve

On the date of transfer of jurisdiction of the reserve, the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer to the Secretary of the Interior all unexpended funds previously appropriated for use in connection with the reserve and all civilian personnel ceilings assigned by the Secretary of the Navy to the management and operation of the reserve as of January 1, 1976.

(Pub. L. 94–258, title I, §103, Apr. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 303.)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY BENDER

Plaintiff, No. C 09-01246 EDL

v. ORDER SETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,

[Reassigned Case]

Defendant.

___________________________________/

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte for trial and

all further proceedings, it is hereby ordered, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Civil L.R. 16-10, that

a Case Management Conference shall be held in this case on April 6, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom

E, 15th Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.

The parties shall appear in person or through lead trial counsel and shall be prepared to discuss

all items referred to in Civil L.R. 16-10. The parties may file an updated joint case management

statement if there are any updates to the parties’ March 5, 2010 statement. Any statement shall be filed

by March 31, 2010.

All documents filed with the Clerk of the Court shall list the civil case number followed only

by the initials "EDL." One copy shall be clearly marked as a chambers copy.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 29, 2010 ______________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01246-EDL Document 65 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 305.3 Selection standards. ( a ) *General.* To qualify for selection for overseas service as a Volunteer, an Applicant must demonstrate that he or she is suitable, possessing the requisite personal and professional attributes required for Peace Corps service generally, and for the particular Volunteer assignment for which he or she is considered. The Peace Corps assesses each Applicant's personal, professional, educational, and legal qualifications in order to select those Applicants most likely to be successful in a Peace Corps assignment, serving under conditions of hardship if necessary to achieve the goals of the Peace Corps. Meeting these qualifications does not in and of itself entitle any individual to serve in the Peace Corps. The Peace Corps endeavors to select the best qualified individuals from among all eligible Applicants.
( b ) *Personal attributes.* Applicants must adequately demonstrate the following personal attributes to Peace Corps: ( 1 ) *Motivation.* A sincere desire to carry out the goals of Peace Corps service, and a commitment to serve a full term as a Volunteer.
( 2 ) *Productive competence.* The intelligence and professional experience or educational background to meet the needs of the individual's assignment.
( 3 ) *Emotional maturity and adaptability.* The maturity, flexibility, cultural sensitivity, and self-sufficiency to adapt successfully to life in another culture, and to interact and communicate with other people regardless of cultural, social, and economic differences.
( 4 ) *Skills.* In addition to any educational, professional or other qualifications and prerequisites that an individual must possess in order to be selected for a given assignment, a Trainee must demonstrate competence in the following areas by the end of pre-service training: ( i ) *Language.* The ability to communicate effectively in the appropriate language or languages of the country of service with the fluency required to meet the needs of the overseas assignment.
( ii ) *Technical competence.* Proficiency in the technical skills needed to carry out the Trainee's assignment as a Volunteer.
( iii ) *Knowledge.* Adequate knowledge of the culture and history of the country of assignment to ensure a successful adjustment to, and acceptance by, the host country society, as well as an appropriate understanding of the history and government of the United States which qualifies the individual to represent the United States abroad.
( c ) *Failure to meet standards.* Failure to meet initial selection standards, failure to attain any of the selection standards by the completion of training, or failure to maintain these standards during service, may be grounds for de-selection and disqualification from Peace Corps service.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6269-6270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Technology Administration


Technology Administration Performance Review Board Membership

     The Technology Administration Performance Review Board (TA PRB) 
reviews performance appraisals, agreements, and recommended actions 
pertaining to employees in the Senior Executive Service and reviews 
performance-related pay increases for ST-3104 employees. The Board 
makes recommendations to the appropriate appointing authority 
concerning such matters so as to ensure the fair and equitable 
treatment of these individuals.
    This notice lists the membership of the TA PRB and supersedes the 
list published in Federal Register Document 01-29675, Vol. 66, No. 230, 
page 59575, dated ---------------- .

 Belinda L. Collins (C), Deputy Director for Technology Services, 
National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 
Appointment Expires: 12/31/05.
 Stephen Freiman (C), Deputy Director, Materials Science & Engineering 
Laboratory, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, 
MD 20899, Appointment Expires: 12/31/04.
 Cita Furlani (C), Chief Information Officer, National Institute of 
Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, Appointment Expires: 
12/31/05.
 Daniel Hurley (C), Director of Communication and Information, 
Infrastructure Assurance Program, National Telecommunications and 
Information Administration, Washington, DC 20230, Appointment Expires: 
12/31/05.
 Deirdre Jones, Director of Systems Engineering Center, Office of 
Science and Technology, National Weather Service, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Appointment 
Expires: 12/31/05.

[[Page 6270]]

 Karen Laney Cummings, Director, Technology Competitiveness, Office of 
Technology Policy, Technology Administration, Washington, DC 20230, 
Appointment Expires: 12/31/05.
 William F. Koch (C), Deputy Director, Chemical Science & Technology 
Laboratory, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, 
MD 20899, Appointment Expires: 12/31/04.

    Dated: January 28, 2004.
Benjamin H. Wu,
Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology, Technology 
Administration, Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 04-2830 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-18-M
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO

. 09

- 1 8

- 00 009

- C V



### ____________________ MIDANI, HINKLE & COLE, LLP, DAVID HUTCHINS, MARK O. MIDANI AND HOWRY, BREEN & HERMAN, LLP , Appellant

V.

ELIZABETH SMITH , Appellee

________________________________________ _____________ __________________

On A ppeal from the 172nd Di strict Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No

. E

- 197,802

________________________________________ ____________ ____________________ ORDER

Midani, Hinkle & Cole, LLP and Mark O. Midani , Appellants, filed a motion
to vacate or, in the alternative, to stay the trial court’s order of contempt, requiring

payment of costs, because the trial court signed the order after the underlying
judgment was superseded.
The appellee, Elizabeth Smith, requested post

- judgment discovery from Mark
O. Midani. Midani objected on the ground that the judgment would be superseded.2

Smith moved to compel post

- judgment discovery responses. On February 13, 2018,

the trial court ordere d Midani and Midani, Hinkle and Cole, LLP to respond to
Smith’s post

-

judgment discovery by February 21, 2018, unless a valid superse d eas

bond was mad e by that date. A supersedeas bond was signed on February 21, 2018
and filed on February 23, 2018. On Febru ary 28, 2018, Midani filed a motion to stay

execution. On March 6, 2018, the trial court held Midani and Midani, Hinkle and
Cole, LLP in contempt and ordered them to pay to Smith’s counsel $2,250.00 by

March 16, 2018 as costs related to the motion to compe l.
Enforcement of a judgment must be suspended if the judgment is superseded.
Tex. R. App. P. 24.1(f). A party may seek appellate review of the trial court’s
determination whether to permit suspension of enforcement by filing a motion with
the appellate c ourt. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.4(a)(1). The appellate court may issue
temporary orders necessary to preserve the parties’ rights. See Tex. R. App. P.

24.4(c).
The Court finds that the judgment has been superseded. Therefore, all

enforcement must cease

. See Tex. R. App. P. 24.1(f). It is, therefore, ORDERED

that the trial court’ s order of March 6, 2018, which held Appellants in contempt and
required them to pay $2,250.00 to Smith’s attorney, and the trial court’s order of3

February 13, 2018, which compelled Ap pellants to respond to post

- judgment
discovery, are STAYED until our mandate issues or until further order of this Court.

ORDER ENTERED March 14 , 2018

.

PER CURIAM

Befor e McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson , JJ.
§ 50.7 Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America. ( a ) Upon application and the submission of satisfactory proof of birth, identity and nationality, and at the time of the reporting of the birth, the consular officer may issue to the parent or legal guardian, when approved and upon payment of a prescribed fee, a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America.
( b ) Amended and replacement Consular Reports of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America may be issued by the Department of State's Passport Office upon written request and payment of the required fee.
( c ) When it reports a birth under § 50.6, the Department shall furnish the Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America to the parent or legal guardian upon application and payment of required fees.
( d ) A Consular Report of Birth Abroad may be cancelled in accordance with applicable provisions in 22 CFR 51.60 through 51.74.
[61 FR 43312, Aug. 22, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 19714, Apr. 22, 1999; 83 FR 21874, May 11, 2018]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1554 LA MONICA SAMUEL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAMSBURG JAMES CITY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, by Denise W. Koch, Chairperson, Defendant - Appellee, and WILLIAMSBURG JAMES CITY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL, Jeffrey Smith, Assistant Superintendent; JAMESTOWN HIGH SCHOOL, Williamsburg James City County, Andrew Cypress, Principal, Robert Nilson, Director of Guidance, Diane Spearman, Counselor; LAFAYETTE HIGH SCHOOL, Williamsburg James City County, Dan Fields, Assistant Principal; COLONIAL UNISERVE BOARD, National Education Association, Jami Chapman, Director, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Walter D. Kelley, District Judge. (4:04-cv-00050-WDK-FBS) Submitted: September 11, 2008 Decided: September 15, 20082 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. La Monica Samuel, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS, ST. CLAIR & LOTKIN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: La Monica Samuel appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying relief in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Samuel v. Williamsburg James City County Sch. Bd. , No. 4:04-cv-00050-WDK-FBS (E.D. Va. Mar. 31, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 7-22-2009 

# P ol yme r D yn amic s Inc v

. B a ye r C orp P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-3730

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " P o lyme r D yn amic s Inc v

. B a ye r C orp " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 975. h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/975UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_____________ N o s . 0 7 -3 7 3 0 , 0 7 -3 7 3 1 , and 07- 4645

_____________ P O L Y M E R D Y N A M IC S , IN C .,

A ppel l ant/ C r os s - A ppel l ee v. BA YE R C OR P OR AT I ON,

A ppel l ee/ C r os s - A ppel l ant

_______________ O n A p p e a l F ro m th e U n ited S tate s D istric t C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( C i vi l N o. 99- cv- 04040) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e Pet r es e B . T ucker

__________________ OR DE R A M E NDI NG

__________________ I tappea r i ng t hatt he opi ni on and j udgm entfi l ed i n t hi s m at t erl i s t ed onl ydocket num ber07- 3730 w hen i n fac tt he opi ni on and j udgm entaddr es s ed ac t i on num ber s 07- 3730, 07- 3731, and 07- 4645, i ti s her ebyO R D E R E D t hatt he C l er k s hal l fi l e an amended opi ni on and j udgm entl i s t i ng al l t hr ee a ct i ons i n t he ca pt i on. F o r th e C o u rt,M arc ia M . W aldro n , C lerk

D at ed: J ul y22, 2009 t r j / cc: J eff r eyA . L amken, E s q. M i chae l M . M us t koff, E s q. V i r gi ni a A . Sei t z, E s q.
§ 1003.504 Use of real property. The standards described in this section apply to real property within the grantee's control which was acquired or improved in whole or in part using ICDBG funds in excess of $25,000. These standards shall apply from the date ICDBG funds are first spent for the property until five years after the closeout of the grant from which the assistance to the property was provided. ( a ) A grantee may not change the use or planned use of any such property (including the beneficiaries of such use) from that for which the acquisition or improvement was made unless the grantee provides affected citizens with reasonable notice of, and opportunity to comment on, any proposed change, and either: ( 1 ) The new use of such property qualifies as meeting the primary objective set forth in § 1003.208 and is not a building for the general conduct of government; or
( 2 ) The requirements in paragraph (b) of this section are met.
( b ) If the grantee determines, after consultation with affected citizens, that it is appropriate to change the use of the property to a use which does not qualify under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, it may retain or dispose of the property for the changed use if the grantee's ICDBG program is reimbursed in the amount of the current fair market value of the property, less any portion of the value attributable to expenditures of non-ICDBG funds for acquisition of, and improvements to, the property.
( c ) If the change of use occurs after program closeout, the proceeds from the disposition of the real property shall be used for activities which meet the eligibility requirements set forth in subpart C of this part and the primary objective set forth in § 1003.208.
( d ) Following the reimbursement of the ICDBG program in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, the property no longer will be subject to any ICDBG requirements.
#### § 236.16 Governing law.

The Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America governing contracts and commercial transactions of the United States Government.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 

As of December 30, 2005

 
| Interline Brands, Inc.                         |   | New Jersey      |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|
|                                                |   |            |
| Wilmar Financial, Inc.                         |   | Delaware        |
|                                                |   |            |
| Wilmar Holdings, Inc.                          |   | Delaware        |
|                                                |   |            |
| Glenwood  Acquisition LLC                           |   | Delaware        |
|                                                |   |            |
| Barnett of the  Caribbean                           |   | Puerto Rico     |
|                                                |   |            |
| Sexauer Ltd.                                        |   | Ontario, Canada |
|                                                |   |            |
| Copperfield  Chimney Supply, Inc.(1)           |   | Oklahoma        |
|                                                |   |            |
| CCS Enterprises, Inc.(2)                       |   | Delaware        |
|                                                |   |            |
| Riverton Machine &  Foundary, Inc.(3) |   | Kentucky        |

 

----

(1) On December 31,2005, merged into CCS Enterprises, Inc. with CCS Enterprises, Inc.being the surviving entity. This merger took place immediately prior to CCSEnterprises, Inc.’s merger into Interline Brands, Inc., a New Jerseycorporation as indicated below in footnote (2).

 

(2) On December 31,2005 merged into Interline Brands, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, withInterline Brands, Inc. being the surviving entity.

 

(3) Dissolved on December 31,2005.

 

----