alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 110–88—SEPT. 28, 2007 121 STAT. 981 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3218: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

Sept. 5, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 12, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–88 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate a portion of Interstate Route 395 located in Baltimore, Maryland, 

as ‘‘Cal Ripken Way’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The portion of Interstate Route 395 located in Baltimore, Maryland, beginning at the junction of Interstate Routes 395 and 95 

and ending at Conway Street shall be known and designated as 

‘‘Cal Ripken Way’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the portion of Interstate 

Route 395 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Cal Ripken Way’’. 

Approved September 28, 2007. 

Sept. 28, 2007 

[H.R. 3218] 


jbridges on GSDDPC57 with PUBLIC LAWS
From: "Miller, Jeff" <Jeff_Miller@treated-wood.org>

To: <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jim Berlow/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov>

Date: 07/19/2012 06:01 AM

Subject: RIN 2060-AR15: Thank you for consi deration of issues on NHSM rule

Ms. Cortney Higgins

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

Re: NSPS and EG: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units: Reconsideration and

Proposed Amendments; Non

‐ Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste: Proposed Rule, RIN

2060

‐ AR15

Dear Ms. Higgins:

Thank you again for meeting with representatives of the Treated Wood Council on June 11, 2012, to

discuss the above rule.

I have attached a brief review of our concerns and ask you to consider them in your decision

‐ making.

Please let me know if you have any questions, or any difficulty opening the attachments.

Jeff Miller

___________________________ Jeff Miller

President & Executive Director

Treated Wood Council

1111 19th Street, NW

Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

www.treated

‐ wood.org

202

‐ 463

‐ 2045

202

‐ 641

‐ 5427 cell

202

‐ 463

‐ 2059 fax

jeff_miller@treated

‐ wood.org

TWC letter to OMB on NHSM rule 7 19 12.pdf

TWC letter to OMB on NHSM rule

attachments 7 19 12.pdf
No. 89-6535.

#### Barnhart *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO  AMENDED AND RESTATED  MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING  AND STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

Effective as of September 5, 2001

1.General.  Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding and
Stock Option Agreement dated as of December 30, 1996 and the Amendment and Consent thereto effective as of November 9, 1998 (as amended, the "Stock
Option"). Capitalized but undefined terms shall have the meanings provided in the Stock Option. Section 15 of the Stock Option provides that it may be amended at any time by
the written agreement and consent of each of the Funds and by the members of Management holding not less than 66-2/3% of the unexercised Options and each of such persons is identified
on the signature pages to this agreement. The sole purpose of this Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding and Stock Option Agreement is to delete the restriction that the
Options may only be exercised on two separate occasions.

2.Amendment.  The final paragraph of Section 2 of the Stock Option is hereby restated in its entirety
as follows:



3.Miscellaneous.  Except for the restatement of the final paragraph of Section 2 as provided herein,
the Stock Option remains in full force and effect. The miscellaneous provisions contained in Section 16, 17, 19, 20 and 22 shall apply to this Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Memorandum of
Understanding and Stock Option Agreement.

(Signature
Page Follows)

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Memorandum of Understanding and Stock Option Agreement as required by Section 15
of the Stock Option, effective as of the first date set forth above.

| |  | /s/LARRY THOMASLarry Thomas                                       
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/MARTY ALBERTSONMarty Albertson                                 
| |  | J.P. MORGAN PARTNERS (SBIC), LLC                                  
| |  | /s/DAVID L. FERGUSONBy: David L. Ferguson
Its: Managing Director  
| |  | WELLS FARGO SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.               
| |  | /s/STEVEN W. BURGEBy: Steven W. Burge
Its: Managing Director      
| |  | WESTON PRESIDIO CAPITAL II, L.P.                                  
| |  | By:WESTON PRESIDIO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P.Its: General Partner
| |  | /s/MICHAEL P. LAZARUSBy: Michael P. Lazarus
Its: General Partner  

S1

---

QuickLinks
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 67 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 67 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01001-SI Document 67 Filed 01/29/10 Page 3 of 3
### §8904. Implementation of comprehensive plan; new or existing regulatory authorities, etc., not granted or modified

(a) The comprehensive plan shall be carried out during the nine fiscal years following the fiscal year in which the comprehensive plan is submitted in its final form under section 8903(c)(3) of this title; and—

(1) shall be carried out in accord with, and meet the program objectives specified in, paragraphs (1) through (11) of section 8903(b) of this title;

(2) shall be managed in accord with paragraphs (12) through (14) of such section; and

(3) shall be funded by annual appropriations, subject to annual authorizations which shall be made for each fiscal year of the program (as provided in section 8905 of this title) after the submission of the Task Force progress report which under section 8903(e) of this title is required to be submitted by January 15 of the calendar year in which such fiscal year begins.

(b) Nothing in this subchapter shall be deemed to grant any new regulatory authority or to limit, expand, or otherwise modify any regulatory authority under existing law, or to establish new criteria, standards, or requirements for regulation under existing law.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title VII, §705, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 773.)
#### § 242.11 Regulatory compliance required.

An application for insurance of a mortgage under this part shall be considered only in connection with a hospital that is in substantial compliance with regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services and the regulations of the applicable state governing the operation and reimbursement of hospitals. A hospital that is under investigation by any state or federal agency for statutory or regulatory violations is not eligible so long as the investigation is unresolved, unless HUD determines that the investigation is minor in nature; that is, the investigation is unlikely to result in substantial liabilities or to otherwise substantially harm the creditworthiness of the hospital.
§ 203.47 Eligibility of growing equity mortgages. A mortgage containing provisions for accelerated amortization corresponding to anticipated variations in family income shall be eligible for insurance under this subpart, subject to compliance with the additional requirements of this section. ( a ) The mortgage must contain complete amortization provisions, satisfactory to the Secretary, requiring monthly payments by the mortgagor not in excess of the mortgagor's reasonable ability to pay, as determined by the Secretary.
( b ) The mortgage must contain a provision setting forth the payments required for principal and interest in each year of the mortgage.
( c ) The monthly payments for principal and interest for the initial year, or such other initial period as the commissioner may approve, shall be determined on the basis of a 30-year level payment amortization schedule. Subsequent monthly payments for principal and interest may increase annually, biennially or at such other interval that is greater than one year, as the Commissioner may approve. The subsequent periodic increases may be up to five percent above the payments for principal and interest for the previous period.
( d ) No later than at the time that a loan application is offered to a prospective mortgagor, the mortgagee shall explain fully to the mortgagor the nature of the obligation undertaken and the mortgagor shall certify that he or she fully understands the obligation.
( e ) The mortgage amount shall not exceed the limits prescribed by § 203.18, 203.18a, or 203.29.
( f ) Sections 203.21 and 203.44 shall not apply to this section.
( g ) This section shall not apply to a mortgage which meets the requirements of § 203.43, § 203.43a, or § 203.49.
( h ) Mortgages complying with the requirements of this section shall be insured under this subpart pursuant to section 245(a) of the National Housing Act.
[49 FR 19453, May 8, 1984, as amended at 49 FR 23584, June 6, 1984; 53 FR 8881, Mar. 18, 1988; 58 FR 41003, July 30, 1993]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PROPOSED ORDER 1

ERSKINE & TULLEY

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

MICHAEL J. CARROLL (St. Bar #50246)

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 303

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 392-5431

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SIGN,

PICTORIAL AND DISPLAY INDUSTRY, et

al.,

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

EVENT PRODUCTIONS INC., etc., 

 Defendant. 

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. C 09 1914 SI

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE; PROPOSED

ORDER 

The parties report the status of this case as follows:

This case was referred to a mediator, and a first session

was held February 1, 2010. A second Hearing is set for February 24,

2010. It is requested that the Case Management Conference be

continued to April 16, 2010 so that mediation can be completed before

a court appearance is necessary.

IT IS STIPULATED that the Case Management Conference be

continued from February 12, 2010 to April 16, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. in

Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco.

Case 3:09-cv-01914-SI Document 17 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PROPOSED ORDER 2

Date: February 9, 2010 ERSKINE & TULLEY

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By:/s/Michael J. Carroll 

 Michael J. Carroll

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Date: February 9, 2010 CALIFORNIA ADVOCACY GROUP

By:/s/Alex Friedland Alex Friedland

 Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:_____________ ___________________________

 Honorable Susan Illston

Case 3:09-cv-01914-SI Document 17 Filed 02/10/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2661

To amend the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 to clarify the Permanent University Fund arbitrage exception and to increase from 20 percent to 30 

percent the amount of securities and obligations benefitting from the 

exception. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 to clarify the 

Permanent University Fund arbitrage exception and to 

increase from 20 percent to 30 percent the amount of 

securities and obligations benefitting from the exception.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF SPECIAL ARBITRAGE RULE 

4 FOR CERTAIN FUNDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 648 of 

6 the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 941) is 

7 amended to read as follows: 
2

•HR 2661 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) such securities or obligations are held in a 

2 fund—

3 ‘‘(A) which, except to the extent of the in4 vestment earnings on such securities or obliga5 tions, cannot be used, under State constitu6 tional or statutory restrictions continuously in 

7 effect since October 9, 1969, through the date 

8 of issue of the bond issue, to pay debt service 

9 on the bond issue or to finance the facilities 

10 that are to be financed with the proceeds of the 

11 bonds, or 

12 ‘‘(B) the annual distributions from which 

13 cannot exceed 7 percent of the average fair 

14 market value of the assets held in such fund ex15 cept to the extent distributions are necessary to 

16 pay debt service on the bond issue,’’. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (3) of 

18 such section is amended by striking ‘‘the investment earn19 ings of’’ both places it occurs and inserting ‘‘distributions 

20 from’’. 

21 (c) CHANGE OF DATE RELATING TO AMOUNT BENE22 FITING FROM RULE.—Paragraph (4) of such section is 

23 amended by striking ‘‘October 9, 1969’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘March 1, 1985’’. 
3

•HR 2661 IH 

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of 

3 this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 11

   Statement re Computation of Basic and Diluted Net Income per Common Share


Basic and diluted net income per common share is calculated as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended March 31, 1997:                                  Number of         Weighted
                                                           Date        shares          Average
                                                  ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>       <C>              <C>
Shares outstanding 1/1/97 (1)                            1/1/97    14,417,116       14,417,116
                                                  ---------------------------------------------

      Weighted average shares outstanding for the period                            14,417,116

            Net income for the period (thousands)                               $        3,999
                                                                              =================

Basic and diluted net income per common share (2)                               $          .28
                                                                              =================
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended March 31, 1998:                                  Number of         Weighted
                                                           Date        shares          Average
                                                    -------------------------------------------
<S>                                                      <C>       <C>          <C>
Shares outstanding 1/1/98                                1/1/98    17,593,366       17,593,366
                                                    -------------------------------------------

      Weighted average shares outstanding for the period                            17,593,366

            Net income for the period (thousands)                               $        5,864
                                                                              =================

Basic and diluted net income per common share (2)                               $         0.33
                                                                              =================
</TABLE>

     (1) Assuming  5,193,693 shares issued in conjunction with the consolidation
transaction  described  in Note 2 to the  condensed  combined  and  consolidated
financial statements had been outstanding for all periods presented.


     (2)There are no dilutive  securities  outstanding for the periods presented
resulting in basic and diluted earnings per share being equal.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF JEFFERY M. JACKSON**

 

Onthis day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005 (the “Report”)

 

This written statementaccompanied the Report.

 

I,Jeffery M. Jackson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifythat:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ JEFFERY M. JACKSON                 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffery M. Jackson                                    |
| Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |
| August 5, 2005                                        |

 

1

----
#### Benedict Itri, Plaintiff, v. Morris Grotsky, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Viking Buick Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, an employee of Viking Buiek, Inc., as a result of the alleged negligent maintenance and operation of a motor vehicle owned by defendant Grotsky and operated by Joseph Ammutai, in which the defendant Grotsky pleaded an affirmative defense that the Workmen’s Compensation Law barred the action, and in which said defendant also served a third-party complaint demanding judgment over against Ammutai and Viking Buiek Inc., his employer, the said third-party defendants (Ammutai and Viking) appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 6, 1961, which denied their motions, pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act, to dismiss the third-party complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (cf. *Frady*v. *Weiss & Sons,*6 A D 2d 241; *Mitchell*v. *A. A. Truck Renting Corp.,*9 A D 2d 682). Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
10.8

     

    Amendment
to License Agreement

     

    Effective
April 15, 2008, Superlattice Power, Inc. (“Superlattice”) entered into a License
Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Li-ion Motors Corp. (formerly EV
Innovations, Inc., “Li-ion”), providing for Li-ion Motors Corp.’s license to
Superlattice of Li-ion’s patent applications and technologies for rechargeable
lithium-ion batteries for hybrid vehicles and other applications (“Licensed
Products”).

     

    Under the
License Agreement, Li-ion has the right to purchase its requirements of lithium
ion batteries from Superlattice and Li-ion’s requirements of lithium ion
batteries shall be supplied in preference to, and on a priority basis as
compared with, supply and delivery arrangements in effect for our other
customers. Li-ion’s cost for lithium ion batteries purchased from Superlattice
is the actual manufacturing costs for such batteries for the fiscal quarter in
which Li-ion’s purchase takes place.

     

    The
parties hereby confirm and agree that the above referenced License Agreement
does not limit Li-ion from granting additional licenses for Licensed Products to
other companies in other countries of the world. Li-ion will not grant other
license agreements to any companies other than Superlattice for commercial
exploitation within the United States of America and its territories and
possessions.

     

    Dated
this 25th day of
May 2010.

     

    
      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      	
                              SUPERLATTICE
      POWER, INC.

                            	 	
                              LI-ION
      MOTORS CORP.

                            
	 
      	 	 
      
	
                              /s/
      Ayaz Kassam

                            	 	
                              /s/
      Stacey Fling

                            
	 	 	 
	
                              By:

                            	 
      	 	
                              By:

                            	
                               

                            
	 	 	 
	
                              Ayaz
      Kassam

                            	 	
                              Stacey
      Fling

                            
	 	 	 
	
                              President

                            	 	
                              President

                            
	 	 	 
	
                              Superlattice
      Power, Inc.

                            	 	
                              Li-ion
      Motors,
Corp.
:ss.

Counties of Kent:

Before me, a Notaxy Publi, for the County and State aforesaicL Wanda Ford-Waring. known to me to be such, who being sworn according to law deposes and says that she is an officer of Independent Newspaper mc, the Publisher of the The Delaware State News, a daily newspaper published at Dover, County of Kent, and State of Delaware, and that the no, a copy of whi as published in the The Delaware State News in its issue of

D.____

Sworn to and subseri before me this

Day of
§ 241.800 Definitions. All of the definitions contained in § 241.500 shall apply to this subpart. In addition, as used in this subpart, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Contract of insurance* means the agreement evidenced by the endorsement of the Commissioner upon the note given in connection with an insured loan and includes the provisions of this subpart and the applicable provisions of the Act.
( b ) *Maturity* means the date on which the loan indebtedness would be extinguished if paid in accordance with periodic payments provided for in the loan.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Michael S. Wasik, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.




Date:
4/12/09


By:
                    /s/
      Michael S. WasikMichael
      S. WasikChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer