alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1735

STEPHAN AYRES; ANGELA AYRES , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Successor to Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securit i es VII, Inc. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Di strict of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:20

- cv - 00275

- GJH )

Submitted : May 20, 2021 Decided: May 27, 2021

Before NIEMEYER , K EENAN , and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.
Stephan Ayres , Angela Ayres , Appellants Pro Se

. Laurie Goon Furshman , DUANE MORRIS, LLP , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Stephan and Angela Ayres appeal the di strict court’s order granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing the Ayreses’ complaint asserting claims related to mortgage fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district court’s dismissal order to show that it is without prejudice and affirm
as modified on the reasoning of the district court

. Ayres v. PHH Mortg. Corp

. , No. 8:20

-

cv - 00275

- GJH (D. Md. June 29, 2020) ; see King v. Rubenstein , 825 F.3d 20 6 , 225 (4th Cir. 2016) (holding that, where district court neither gave plaintiff the opportunity to amend

nor stated why amendment would be futile , dismissal should be without prejudice)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal content ions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
### §7901. Congressional findings and purposes

(a) The Congress finds that uranium mill tailings located at active and inactive mill operations may pose a potential and significant radiation health hazard to the public, and that the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare and the regulation of interstate commerce require that every reasonable effort be made to provide for the stabilization, disposal, and control in a safe and environmentally sound manner of such tailings in order to prevent or minimize radon diffusion into the environment and to prevent or minimize other environmental hazards from such tailings.

(b) The purposes of this chapter are to provide—

(1) in cooperation with the interested States, Indian tribes, and the persons who own or control inactive mill tailings sites, a program of assessment and remedial action at such sites, including, where appropriate, the reprocessing of tailings to extract residual uranium and other mineral values where practicable, in order to stabilize and control such tailings in a safe and environmentally sound manner and to minimize or eliminate radiation health hazards to the public, and

(2) a program to regulate mill tailings during uranium or thorium ore processing at active mill operations and after termination of such operations in order to stabilize and control such tailings in a safe and environmentally sound manner and to minimize or eliminate radiation health hazards to the public.

(Pub. L. 95–604, §2, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3021.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–604, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3021, known as the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1988 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–616, §1, Nov. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 3192, provided: "That this Act [amending sections 7916 and 7922 of this title] may be cited as the 'Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Amendments Act of 1988'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–604, §1, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3021, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and sections 2022, 2113, and 2114 of this title, amending sections 2014, 2021, 2111, and 2201 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 2014, 2021, and 2113 of this title] may be cited as the 'Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978'."
Second Department,

April, 1977

(April 18, 1977) 

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Jackson, Appellant.

Motion bythe respondent to resettle the order and memorandum of this court, both dated January 31, 1977, which reversed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 20, 1975, on the law and the facts, and dismissed the indictment by amending *1187their decretal paragraphs by striking therefrom the words "and the facts”. Motion granted. The decision dated January 31, 1977 amended by striking from its decretal paragraph the words "and the facts”. Order also dated January 31, 1977 amended accordingly. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.3

                 INTERSTAR SECURITISATION MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned  officer of Interstar  Securitisation  Management Pty Limited, a
company  organized  under  the  laws  of  Victoria,  Australia  ("ISM"),  hereby
certifies on behalf of ISM and on his own behalf for  purposes of the  Interstar
Millennium  Series 2003-3G Trust Class A2 and Class B1 Mortgage  Backed Floating
Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

1.   I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of ISM,

2.   I am duly  authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's  Certificate on
     behalf of ISM; and

3.   To the best of my  knowledge,  the Issuer  Trustee  has  complied  with all
     conditions and covenants under the Transaction Documents, for the Interstar
     Millennium  Series  2003-3G  issue of Notes for the period  between July 9,
     2003 the date on which the Trust  issued  Notes,  to the end of the Trust's
     fiscal year on December  31, 2003 (such  period  which  includes  the first
     Trust payment date on September 29, 2003).

Capitalized  terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings  assigned
to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced  issue of
Notes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of October 13, 2004.



/s/ Sam Kyriacou
-------------------------------------------
Name:    Sam Kyriacou
Title:   Director, Interstar Securitisation
         Management Pty Limited
### §1465. Annual reports of department and its bureaus

The annual reports of the department and of all its bureaus and establishments, including the Bureau of Reclamation, shall not exceed a total of one thousand two hundred and fifty pages.

(May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 554; Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1176; June 5, 1924, ch. 264, 43 Stat. 392; Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1143.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 495 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
Exhibit 99.2















Report of Independent

Registered Public Accounting Firm



Board of Directors

Structured Obligations Corporation

New York, New York



We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement
      and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended December 31, 2023. 
      Depositor's management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
      examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
      reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor's and Trustee's compliance with specified requirements.



In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December
      31, 2023.



This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Certificate Holders
      of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.









February 8, 2024



































---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      27,008
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              198,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                159,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           412,671
<PP&E>                                   1,415,620
<DEPRECIATION>                              76,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,069,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      634,008
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                   121,400
<OTHER-SE>                                 605,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,069,963
<SALES>                                    702,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           708,387
<CGS>                                      194,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              837,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          52,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (128,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (128,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (128,939)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.010)


</TABLE>
### §1455. Solicitor; appointment; duties

On and after June 26, 1946 the legal work of the Department of the Interior shall be performed under the supervision and direction of the Solicitor of the Department of the Interior, who shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(June 26, 1946, ch. 494, 60 Stat. 312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions of this section which prescribed the compensation of the Solicitor were omitted to conform to the provisions of the Federal Executive Salary Schedule. See section 5311 et seq. of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Section was formerly classified to section 483a of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WANDA JOHNSON, ET AL.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT,

ET AL.,

Defendant(s).

____________________________________/

No. C 09-00901 MHP (JCS)

ORDER EXCUSING ATTENDANCE AT

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL AND PARTIES OF RECORD:

On January 19, 2010, Defendants Anthony Pirone and Marysol Domenci filed a request to be

excused from personally appearing at the settlement conference scheduled for January 26, 2010. No

opposition was filed by any party.

Upon consideration of the request, the Court finds good cause for excusing personal

attendance. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Anthony Pirone and Marysol Domenci be

available by telephone from 9:30 a.m., Pacific Standard Time until further notice on January 26,

2010.

If the Court concludes that the absence of Anthony Pirone and Marysol Domenci is

interfering with the settlement conference, the Court may continue the settlement conference and

may order personal attendance by each party including Anthony Pirone and Marysol Domenci.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2010 _______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00901-EMC Document 58 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 1
### §§8781, 8782. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 8781 and 8782 were omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.

Section 8781, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §181, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 680, related to disposal of corporate tangible assets.

Section 8782, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §182, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 681, related to disposal of assets other than as provided for in section 8781.
### §5673. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5673 was editorially reclassified as section 11183 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §§8741 to 8745. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 8741 to 8745 were omitted from the Code in view of termination of United States Synthetic Fuels Corporation. See note set out under section 8791 of this title.

Section 8741, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §141, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 665, related to construction and operation of synthetic fuel projects.

Section 8742, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §142, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 666, limited construction projects.

Section 8743, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §143, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 666, subjected construction projects and joint ventures to certain Federal laws and provided for monitoring of environmental and health related emissions.

Section 8744, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §144, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 667, related to construction project reports.

Section 8745, Pub. L. 96–294, title I, §145, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 667, related to financial record requirements for contract recipients.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif.

## In Cooperation with the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA)

##### U.S. Geological SurveyOpen-File Report 2007-1181Version 1.0

# Audiomagnetotelluric Data and Two-Dimensional Models from Spring, Snake, and Three Lakes Valleys, Nevada

### *By* Darcy K. McPhee, Bruce A. Chuchel, and Louise Pellerin

#### 2007

#### Abstract

Audiomagnetotelluric (AMT) data along thirteen profiles in Spring, Snake, and Three Lakes Valleys, and the corresponding two-dimensional (2-D) inverse models, are presented. The AMT method is a valuable tool for estimating the electrical resistivity of the Earth over depth ranges of a few meters to roughly one kilometer. It is important for revealing subsurface structure and stratigraphy within the Basin and Range province of eastern Nevada that can be used to define the geohydrologic framework of the region. We collected AMT data using the Geometrics StrataGem EH4 system. Profiles were 1.2 to 4.6 km in length with station spacing of 100-400 m. Data were recorded in a coordinate system parallel to and perpendicular to the assumed regional geologic strike direction. We show station locations, sounding curves of apparent resistivity, phase, and coherency, and 2-D models. The 2-D inverse models are computed from the transverse electric (TE), transverse magnetic (TM), and TE+TM mode data using the conjugate gradient, finite-difference method of Rodi and Mackie (2001). Preliminary interpretation of these models defines the structural framework of the basins and the resistivity contrasts between alluvial basin-fill, volcanic units, and carbonate/clastic rocks. 

----

Download this report as a 47-page PDF file (of2007-1181.pdf; 7.9 MB).

Download Appendix A for this report; it is another 47 pages as a  report as a 47-page PDF file (of2007-1181_appendix_a.pdf; 4.1 MB).

For questions about the content of this report, contact Darcy McPhee

Suggested citation and version history

----

Download a copy of the latest version of Adobe Reader for free.

| Help | PDF help | Publications main page || Western Open-File Reports for 2007 || Geologic Division | Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif. (GUMP) |
This report is available only on the Web

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey	URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1181/	Page Contact Information: Michael Diggles	Page Last Modified: January 31, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oliver Smith, Appellant.

Order entered on October 14, 1960 unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order entered on October 26, 1961 unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from order entered on November 21, 1961 unanimously dismissed, without costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### Dental Development & Mfg. Corp., Respondent, v Steven M. Antler et al., Appellants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to enjoin defendants from divulging trade secrets, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 14, 1977, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of enjoining the defendants from, *inter alia,*"disclosing and/or using” trade secrets and customer lists of the plaintiff. Order modified by adding thereto a provision conditioning the grant of the preliminary injunction upon the giving by the plaintiff of an undertaking in the amount of $25,000, with a corporate surety, so that the plaintiff, if it is finally determined that it was not entitled to an injunction, will pay to the defendant all damages and costs which may be sustained by reason of the injunction. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondent. Special Term erred in failing to include a provision in its order requiring the plaintiff to post an undertaking (see CPLR 6312, subd [b]). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
IIB 

Calendar No. 484 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2977 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 22, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, as 

the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, shall be 

6 known and designated as the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office 

7 Building’’. 
2 

•HR 2977 RS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 484 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2977 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Brockway, Montana, as the ‘‘Paul Kasten Post al Service located at 306 2nd Avenue in 

JUNE 22, 2006 

Reported without amendment
### §1466. Administration of oaths, affirmations, etc., by employees of Division of Investigations; force and effect

Special agents and such other employees of the Division of Investigations, Department of the Interior of the United States, as are designated by the Secretary of the Interior for that purpose, are authorized and empowered to administer to or take from any person an oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition whenever necessary in the performance of their official duties. Any such oath, affirmation, affidavit, or deposition administered or taken by or before a special agent or such other employee of the Division of Investigations, Department of the Interior, designated by the Secretary of the Interior, when certified under his hand, shall have like force and effect as if administered or taken before an officer having a seal.

(Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 878, 54 Stat. 1175.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 498 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out under section 1451 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER XII—MOVING EXPENSES RESULTING FROM ACQUISITION OF LANDS BY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
### §103. Witnesses' fees

Witnesses shall have the right to receive their fee for one day's attendance and mileage in advance. The fees and mileage of witnesses shall be the same as that provided by law in the district courts of the United States in the district in which such land offices are situated; and the witness shall be entitled to receive his fee for attendance in advance from day to day during the hearing.

(Jan. 31, 1903, ch. 344, §2, 32 Stat. 790.)
November 18, 2014.



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF H .D.C AND R.C.C., CHILDREN

NO. 14

- 13

- 00976

- CV

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed, October 1, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in requiring appellant Misty Cole to be “off work” and “present” during her extended thirty

- day summer possession. We therefore order that the portions of the judgment that impose this restriction on appellant’s possession are REVERSED . W e find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it AFFIRMED

. We order the cause REMANDED for proceeding s in accordance with this court’ s opinion. For good cause, we order appellant Misty Cole to pay two

- thirds of all costs incurred in this appeal, and we order appellee Robert Cole to pay one

- third of al l costs incurred in this appeal. W e further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Bruce J. Haber,
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.




May 14,
2008


/s/
      Bruce J. HaberBruce
      J. HaberChief
      Executive Officer