alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 214.200 Inactive status. ( a ) HUD may change a participating agency's status to inactive, in lieu of terminations of HUD-approved status or removals from the list of HUD-approved agencies, under certain circumstances that may temporarily impair an agency from complying with its housing counseling plan. An agency's status may be changed to inactive on a case-by-case basis for a period not to exceed 6 months, unless an extension is provided by HUD under paragraph (d) of this section. HUD may change an agency's status through either a request submitted to HUD or as a result of information obtained by the Department. Some of the conditions under which inactive status may be considered include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Loss of counselor(s);
( 2 ) Damage to facilities by natural disasters that renders the agency unable to function properly;
( 3 ) Loss of funds;
( 4 ) Relocation;
( 5 ) Other circumstances caused by reasons beyond the agency's control; or
( 6 ) Results of performance review.
( b ) Agencies that seek temporary inactive status must submit a request to HUD in writing. Documentation or evidence of the condition(s) that rendered the agency incapable of carrying out its housing counseling plan must be submitted along with the request, if possible. Upon receipt of the request, HUD will review and notify the agency of approval or rejection, in writing. If approved, the agency's name and contact information will be temporarily removed from the HUD-approved Web list of agencies and the telephone referral system.
( c ) The agency must notify HUD in writing and provide supporting documentation or evidence when it is ready to resume operation, or no later than the end of the inactive period. After review and acceptance by HUD, the agency's contact information may be restored to the Web list of HUD-approved and participating agencies and the telephone referral system.
( d ) At HUD's discretion, if the condition(s) still exists, an extension of the inactive period may be considered or the agency may be terminated or removed from the Housing Counseling program. HUD will notify the agency in writing of its decision.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
  THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  EXTRACTED FROM THE SRI RECEIVABLES PURCHASE CO., INC.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     May-1-1999
<CASH>                                    0
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     85,237
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       88,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 3,841
<BONDS>                              30,000
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                           37,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         88,499
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      1,753
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           194
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         624
<INCOME-TAX>                            231
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     393
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      (1,206)
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (813)
<EPS-BASIC>                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.23  [LETTERHEAD OF GMH
COMMUNITIES]  February 11, 2008  353 Associates, LP c/o
GMH Communities Trust 10 Campus Boulevard Newtown Square, PA 19073  Re:Lease
of Space by GMH Military Housing, LLC in 10 Campus Boulevard  Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:  GMH Military Housing, LLC
(Tenant) currently leases space in 10 Campus Boulevard, Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania (the Building) pursuant to the terms of that certain Lease
Agreement dated November 2, 2004 by and between 353 Associates, LP, as
landlord (Landlord) and Tenant, as tenant (the Lease).  Tenant wishes to modify
certain provisions of the Lease to (i) change the square footage of the
premises leased by Tenant in the Building in a manner consistent with the
anticipated needs of Tenant, (ii) reduce the term of the Lease to expire
on the first anniversary of the Closing Date (as such term is defined in the
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among GMH Communities Trust, GMH
Communities, LP and Balfour Beatty, Inc. dated February 11, 2008), and
(iii) provide for the continued use by Tenant of conference rooms and
common facilities within the Building. 
The parties will use commercially reasonable efforts to execute and
deliver an amendment to the Lease setting forth the above terms as soon as practicable.  If these terms and
conditions are acceptable to you, please have this letter executed on behalf of
Landlord where indicated below and return a signed copy of this letter to me at
your earliest convenience.  Sincerely,GMH
  Military Housing, LLCBy:
  /s/
  Denise HubleyAcknowledged
  and Agreed to:353
  Associates, LPBy:353
  Associates GP, LLCBy:
  /s/
  Joseph M. Macchione
#### § 242.73 Waiver of eligibility requirements for mortgage insurance.

The Secretary may insure under this part, without regard to any limitation upon eligibility contained in this subpart, any mortgage assigned to him or her in connection with payment under a contract of mortgage insurance, or executed in connection with a sale by him or her of any property previously insured under this part and acquired subsequent to a claim.
### SUBCHAPTER XVII—LEGISLATION APPLICABLE TO PARTICULAR PROJECTS GENERALLY
### §7573. State standards and controls

No State or political subdivision thereof may adopt or attempt to enforce any standard respecting emissions of any air pollutant from any aircraft or engine thereof unless such standard is identical to a standard applicable to such aircraft under this part.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §233, as added Pub. L. 91–604, §11(a)(1), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1704.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1857f–11 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-41215

Conference Calendar

 

ANTHONY WAYNE WHITE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BRUCE E. ZELLER, Assistant Warden; 

METTIE DEGETAIRE, Mail Clerk,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:96-CV-88

- - - - - - - - - -

August 14, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, AND DUHÉ, CIRCUIT JUDGES. 

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Wayne White, Texas prisoner #541668, appeals the

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). He argues that prison officials

denied his constitutional right of adequate, effective, and

meaningful access to the courts. We have reviewed the record and

White’s brief, and we conclude that White’s appeal is without

merit and therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,
No. 96-41215

-2-

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). White is cautioned that future frivolous

civil suits and appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite

the imposition of sanctions. White is cautioned further to

review any pending suits and appeals to ensure that they do not

raise arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### Barwin Building Corp., Appellant, v. Arthur J. Leatherman et al., Respondents.

In an action by a vendor of real property, in which the complaint pleads two causes: a first cause to recover on a cheek representing the down payment made by the vendees (defendants) on account of the contract for the sale of premises with a building to be erected thereon by the vendor; and a second cause to recover damages based upon the vendees’ alleged breach of the contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 3, 1962, which denied its motion for summary judgment as to the first cause of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Robert G. Cocks, Jr., President and ChiefExecutive Officer and Robert J. Halloran, Jr., Vice President andTreasurer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) each certify in theircapacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual reportof the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal ended June 30,2005 and that to the best of their knowledge:

1.                the report fullycomplies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.                the informationcontained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply withTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amendedby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to PSB Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PSB Holdings, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
| September 19, 2005 |                                  | \s\ ROBERT G. COCKS, JR.    |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Date               | Robert G. Cocks, Jr.             |
|               | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| September 19, 2005 |                                  | \s\ ROBERT J. HALLORAN, JR. |
| Date               | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.          |
|               | Vice President and Treasurer          |

 

----
#### Green *et al. v.*Green.

August 17, 1912.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Eite. Gordon superior court. Mareb.8, 1911.

*T. W. Shelly*and *Maddox, McOamy & Shumate,*for plaintiffs.

*0. N. Starr*and *J. M. Neel,*for defendant.

Lumpkin, J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion to continue the case.

2. When the plaintiffs failed or refused to proceed with the trial after the overruling of the motion to continue, and offered no evidence, it was error to direct a verdict against them. The proper judgment was one of dismissal.

3. This will not require a reinstatement of the ease, or a new trial. But direction is given that the verdict and judgment thereon be vacated, and that in lieu thereof a judgment dismissing the case, with costs against the plaintiffs, be entered.

*(a)*The plaintiffs in error, having obtained a substantial modification of the judgment, are entitled to have judgment for the costs of bringing the case to this court and those accruing in this,court.

*Judgment affirmed, with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 901.22 Representative.

*Representative* means the person(s) identified in writing to the Board as assisting the party or parties in the presentation of the case.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 2, 2016

d1026

Order 

Clerk

November 2, 2016

151795

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151795

COA: 319400

Marquette CC: 12-050218-FH

ROSCOE RICO MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Although the 

Court of Appeals in this case relied on People v Herron, 303 Mich App 392 (2013), 

which this Court overruled in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015), we are not 

persuaded that the defendant has established a threshold showing of plain error under 

Lockridge or that the questions presented should otherwise be reviewed by this Court. 

The application for leave to appeal is therefore DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Bruce J. Haber,
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.








August
      14, 2008/s/
            Bruce J. HaberBruce
      J. HaberChief
      Executive Officer
### §1753. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 94–579, title IV, §403, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2775; Pub. L. 95–514, §10, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1808, provided for the establishment and maintenance of grazing advisory boards and expired on Dec. 31, 1985.
#### Mary Forray, Appellant, v New York Hospital et al., Respondents

Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 21,1977, directing plaintiff to serve written interrogatories on defendant Harry Brown, is unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, by directing plaintiff to serve defendant Brown with written questions pursuant to CPLR 3108, deleting the reference to interrogatories pursuant to CPLR 3130, and as so modified, the order is affirmed. Respondent, an anesthesiologist, one of several defendants in this action to recover damages for personal injuries for negligence and malpractice, presently resides and is engaged in active medical practice in California. Pursuant to respondent’s motion, Special Term directed plaintiff to serve written interrogatories on him pursuant to CPLR 3130. Although we agree that CPLR 3130 does not permit written interrogatories in actions to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from negligence, nonetheless CPLR 3108 allows out-of-State examinations on written questions and examinations on open commissions. Obviously, the reference in the order to CPLR 3130 was an inadvertence; the record does show that respondent is the type of litigant CPLR 3108 was designed to serve. It appears respondent’s participation in the surgical procedure was insignificant, and travel to New York at this time would result in hardship to him and his family in that he would incur considerable expense and lose substantial income. Under the circumstances use of written questions pursuant to CPLR 3108 appears warranted. *(Roch*
      *771
      *ester v Bergen,*263 App Div 733.) Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Evans, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28308]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, RFP SBIR Topic 208--Targetry Systems for Production of 
Research Radionuclides.
    Date: February 7, 2005.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kenneth L. Bielat, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 7147, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7576, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35575c505954415e7558545c591b5b5c5d1b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fede6eae3eefbe4cfe2eee6e3a1e1e6e7a1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS).
    Dated: December 20, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-28308 Filed12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 242.92 Minimum principal loan amount.

A mortgagee may not require, as a condition of providing a loan secured by a mortgage insured under this part, that the principal amount of the mortgage exceed a minimum amount established by the mortgagee.
#### § 1003.200 General policies.

An activity may be assisted in whole or in part with ICDBG funds only if the activity meets the eligibility requirements of section 105 of the Act as further defined in this subpart and if the criteria for compliance with the primary objective of the Act set forth under § 1003.208 have been met. The requirements for compliance with the primary objective of the Act do not apply to imminent threat grants funded under subpart E of this part.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 2031

_____________________________ C HRISTOPHER D ORTLY ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

— Original Jurisdiction

.

January 5, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Cliff Wilson, Jr., Public Defender, and Nathan Marshburn, Assistant Public Defender, Lake City
, for Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
AND  CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  OF  TRENDWEST   RESORTS,   INC.  AND
SUBSIDIARIES  AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                   3,162
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            110,099
<ALLOWANCES>                             15,771
<INVENTORY>                              44,057
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         0
<PP&E>                                   22,652
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           207,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    0
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                                 61,318
<OTHER-SE>                               97,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             207,100
<SALES>                                  112,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         133,199
<CGS>                                    34,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            34,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         7,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          28,942
<INCOME-TAX>                             11,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      17,654
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             17,654
<EPS-BASIC>                            1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                            1.03



</TABLE>