alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 266

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect Social Security 

beneficiaries against any reduction in benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee 

on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to protect 

Social Security beneficiaries against any reduction in 

benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Protec5 tion Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 266 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFICIARI. 

2 Section 312 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

3 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(g) POINT OF ORDER TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECU6 RITY BENEFITS.—(1) It shall not be in order in the House 

7 of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or 

8 joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference re9 port thereon, that—

10 ‘‘(A) reduces or has the effect of reducing any 

11 current benefits under the old-age, survivors, and 

12 disability insurance programs under title II of the 

13 Social Security Act; or 

14 ‘‘(B) provides for or has the effect of providing 

15 for cost-of-living increases of benefits under the old16 age, survivors, and disability insurance programs 

17 under title II of the Social Security Act that are less 

18 than what would be provided under title II of the 

19 Social Security Act as of the day of consideration of 

20 the applicable measure. 

21 ‘‘(2) As used in paragraph (1), the term ‘current’, 

22 when referring to benefits, means benefits payable as of 

23 the day of consideration of the applicable measure.’’. 

24 SEC. 3. SUPER-MAJORITY REQUIREMENT IN THE SENATE. 

25 Section 904 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 

26 is amended—
3

•HR 266 IH 

1 (1) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

2 312(c)’’ and inserting ‘‘312(c), and 312(g)’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (d)(3), by striking ‘‘and 

4 312(c)’’ and by inserting ‘‘312(c), and 312(g)’’.

Æ
#### § 511.10 Settlement of claim.

The General Counsel will review the findings from the standpoint of questions of law applicable to the claim and will determine disposition. The General Counsel will make final review for settlement of the claim and will sign SF-1145, Voucher for Payment Under Federal Tort Claims Act, and forward it to the Financial Operations Division for payment of claim. Payment of any award or settlement in the amount of $2,500 or less will be authorized from the appropriation and allotment current for obligation on the date of settlement irrespective of when the cause of action arose. Payment of any award, compromise or settlement in an amount in excess of $2,500, shall be paid in a manner similar to judgments and compromises out of the appropriation provided by section (c), Pub. L. 89-506 (28 U.S.C. 2672).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE SRI RECEIVABLES PURCHASE CO., INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                              0 
<SECURITIES>                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               75,874 
<PP&E>                                              0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 80,992 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,921 
<BONDS>                                        30,000 
<COMMON>                                            0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,429 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   80,992 
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,551 
<CGS>                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     677 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,870 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,004 
<INCOME-TAX>                                      743 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,261 
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,261
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 
                                              

</TABLE>
### §1600. Findings and purposes

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) there are multiple purposes established by law for the dams and other control structures administered by the Secretary of the Interior on the Colorado River;

(2) the maintenance of the Colorado River Floodway established in this chapter is essential to accomplish these multiple purposes;

(3) developments within the Floodway are and will continue to be vulnerable to damaging flows such as the property damage which occurred in 1983 and may occur in the future;

(4) certain Federal programs which subsidize or permit development within the Floodway threaten human life, health, property, and natural resources; and

(5) there is a need for coordinated Federal, State, and local action to limit Floodway development.

#### (b) Purpose

The Congress declares that the purposes of this chapter are to—

(1) establish the Colorado River Floodway, as designated and described further in this chapter, so as to provide benefits to river users and to minimize the loss of human life, protect health and safety, and minimize damage to property and natural resources by restricting future Federal expenditures and financial assistance, except public health funds, which have the effect of encouraging development within the Colorado River Floodway; and

(2) establish a task force to advise the Secretary of the Interior and the Congress on establishment of the Floodway and on managing existing and future development within the Floodway, including the appropriateness of compensation in specified cases of extraordinary hardship.

(Pub. L. 99–450, §2, Oct. 8, 1986, 100 Stat. 1129.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 99–450, Oct. 8, 1986, 100 Stat. 1129, known as the Colorado River Floodway Protection Act, which enacted this chapter and section 4029 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 99–450, §1, Oct. 8, 1986, 100 Stat. 1129, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and section 4029 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare] may be cited as the 'Colorado River Floodway Protection Act'."
§ 711.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford an individual with handicaps an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the individual with handicaps.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf persons (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used to communicate with persons with impaired hearing.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 711.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with handicaps receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2977 Engrossed in House (EH)]

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2977

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, as the ``Paul Kasten Post 
                           Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2977

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 306 2nd Avenue in Brockway, Montana, as the ``Paul Kasten Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 306 2nd 
Avenue in Brockway, Montana, shall be known and designated as the 
``Paul Kasten Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paul Kasten Post Office 
Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### §4851. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) low-level lead poisoning is widespread among American children, afflicting as many as 3,000,000 children under age 6, with minority and low-income communities disproportionately affected;

(2) at low levels, lead poisoning in children causes intelligence quotient deficiencies, reading and learning disabilities, impaired hearing, reduced attention span, hyperactivity, and behavior problems;

(3) pre-1980 American housing stock contains more than 3,000,000 tons of lead in the form of lead-based paint, with the vast majority of homes built before 1950 containing substantial amounts of lead-based paint;

(4) the ingestion of household dust containing lead from deteriorating or abraded lead-based paint is the most common cause of lead poisoning in children;

(5) the health and development of children living in as many as 3,800,000 American homes is endangered by chipping or peeling lead paint, or excessive amounts of lead-contaminated dust in their homes;

(6) the danger posed by lead-based paint hazards can be reduced by abating lead-based paint or by taking interim measures to prevent paint deterioration and limit children's exposure to lead dust and chips;

(7) despite the enactment of laws in the early 1970's requiring the Federal Government to eliminate as far as practicable lead-based paint hazards in federally owned, assisted, and insured housing, the Federal response to this national crisis remains severely limited; and

(8) the Federal Government must take a leadership role in building the infrastructure—including an informed public, State and local delivery systems, certified inspectors, contractors, and laboratories, trained workers, and available financing and insurance—necessary to ensure that the national goal of eliminating lead-based paint hazards in housing can be achieved as expeditiously as possible.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1002, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3897.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1001, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3897, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and sections 2681 to 2692 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, amending sections 1437f, 1437aaa–1, 1437aaa–2, 1471, 4822, 5305, 12705, 12742, 12872, 12873, 12892, and 12893 of this title, sections 1703, 1709, and 1715l of Title 12, Banks and Banking, sections 2606, 2610, 2612, 2615, 2616, 2618, and 2619 of Title 15, and section 671 of Title 29, Labor, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 2601 of Title 15] may be cited as the 'Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992'."
§ 206.35 Title of property which is security for HECM. ( a ) A mortgagor is not required to be a borrower; however, any borrower is required to be on title to the property which serves as collateral for the HECM, and is therefore, by definition, also a mortgagor.
( b ) The mortgagor shall hold title to the entire property which is the security for the mortgage. If there are multiple mortgagors, all the mortgagors must collectively hold title to the entire property which is the security for the mortgage. If one or more mortgagors hold a life estate in the property, for purposes of this section only, the term “mortgagor” shall include each holder of a future interest in the property (remainder or reversion) who has executed the mortgage.
( c ) If Non-Borrowing Spouses and non-borrowing owners of the property will continue to hold title to the property which serves as collateral for the HECM, such Non-Borrowing Spouses and non-borrowing owners must sign the mortgage as mortgagors, evidencing their commitment of the property as security for the mortgage.
( d ) All Non-Borrowing Spouses and non-borrowing owners shall sign a certification that: ( 1 ) Consents to their spouse or other borrowing owner obtaining the HECM;
( 2 ) Acknowledges the terms and conditions of the mortgage; and
( 3 ) Acknowledges that the property will serve as collateral for the HECM as evidenced by mortgage lien(s).
§ 206.123 Claim procedures in general. ( a ) *Claims.* Mortgagees may submit claims for the payment of the mortgage insurance benefits if: ( 1 ) The conditions of § 206.107(a)(1) pertaining to the optional assignment of the mortgage by the mortgagee have been met and the mortgagee assigns the mortgage to the Commissioner;
( 2 ) The mortgagee is unable or unwilling to make the payments under the mortgage and assigns the mortgage to the Commissioner pursuant to the Commissioner's demand, as provided in § 206.121(b);
( 3 ) The borrower or other permissible party sells the property for less than the outstanding loan balance and the mortgagee releases the mortgage of record to facilitate the sale, as provided in § 206.125(c);
( 4 ) The mortgagee acquires title to the property by foreclosure or a deed in lieu of foreclosure and sells the property as provided in § 206.125(g) for an amount which does not satisfy the outstanding loan balance or fails to sell the property as provided in § 206.127(a)(2); or
( 5 ) The mortgagee forecloses and a bidder other than the mortgagee purchases the property for an amount that is not sufficient to satisfy the outstanding loan balance, as provided in § 206.125(e).
( b ) [Reserved]
#### Floyd B. MAIBIE, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 2006-3275.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 10, 2007.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the.time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
### §7431. Land use authority

Nothing in this chapter constitutes an infringement on the existing authority of counties and cities to plan or control land use, and nothing in this chapter provides or transfers authority over such land use.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §131, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title VIII, §805, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2689.)
#### § 206.117 General.

The Commissioner is required by statute to take any action necessary to provide a borrower with funds to which the borrower is entitled under the mortgage and which the borrower does not receive because of the default of the mortgagee. The Commissioner may hold a second mortgage to secure repayment by the borrower under § 206.27(d). Where the Commissioner does not hold a second mortgage, but makes a payment to the borrower, and such payment is not reimbursed by the mortgagee, the Commissioner shall accept assignment of the first mortgage.
###### Editorial Note on Part 66

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 66 appear at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999.

#### § 66.6 Exemptions.

NED reserves the right to withhold records and information that are exempt from disclosure under FOIA. *See* 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Case 3:08-md-01930-MMC Document 249 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 2
May 21

Case 3:08-md-01930-MMC Document 249 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 2
MMMM Class! - Preserve the existing character of the landscape
M88 Class !l - Retain the existing character of the landscape

Class Ill - Partially retain the existing character of the landscape
{| Class 1V - Management activities may dominate the landscape

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

Medicine Bow

ALBANY

PS bawock

ALBANY __
LARAMIE

is
Cheyenne

e

7 66 65 64

6

1°) 10 20 40 60 80
Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
rr
Miles
Map 2-52

Visual Resource Management
Alternative 2

63 62 R6IW 6g
#### State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v Robert Alfarone, Jr., et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding, *inter alia, to*stay arbitration under the New York automobile accident indemnification *1035endorsement contained in a policy issued by petitioner, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 6, 1977, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. This case involves an injury to an infant resulting from a collision of unregistered trail bikes which were operated on trails on private property. In determining an application to stay arbitration, courts are confined to the narrow issue of whether the dispute is arbitrable and the merits of the claim are not to be reached *(Matter of Schachter [Witte & Co.],*52 AD2d 121). The present dispute involves questions of fact and issues of contract interpretation concerning whether the claimant was injured by a motor vehicle on a public highway. This dispute comes within the language of the policy’s arbitration clause, which provides for arbitration of any claim where the claimant and the company “do not agree that such person is legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury to the insured”. The scope of legal entitlement necessarily includes a question of coverage and, therefore, the issues must be resolved by the arbitrators. The claimant’s failure to give notice within 90 days may be excused in the absence of any showing of prejudice and in view of the claimant’s young age (12 years old) (see *Matter of Raiford v Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp.,*29 AD2d 883). Bamiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Eabin, JJ., concur.
#### Anne Garrone et al., Appellants, v. Doris Nottingham, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.
## No. 01-14-00970- CR

In the



### Court of Appeals

For the



### First District of Texas

At Houston

♦

No . 127139

In the 209 th Criminal District Court

Of Harris County, Texas

♦



### FLORENCIO LEAL

Appellant

V.



### THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

♦



## STATE’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH

TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

♦



### TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

THE STATE OF TEXAS, pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10.5(b) & 38.6(d),

moves for an extension of time within which to file its appellate brief. In support

of its motion, the State submits the following:

1. Appellant was charged with capital murder.

2. A ppellant entered a plea of “ not guilty .” ACCEPTED

01-14-00972-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

10/30/2015 12:49:35 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK3. A jury found appellant guilty as charged and he was automatically

sentenced to confinement for life

.

4. Appellant filed a written notice o f appeal on November 19, 2014

.

5. Appellant’s brief was filed August 13, 2015

.

6. The State’s brief was due September 14 , 2015

.

7. The State seeks an extension until today, October 30 , 2015 , to file its

brief.

8. The following facts are relied upon to show good cause for the

requested extension:

a. The undersigned attorney has filed 3 briefs i n the last 3 0

days and has 5 more briefs due in the next 30 days.

b. The State’s motion is not for purposes of delay, but so that

justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, the State prays that this Court will grant the requested

extension until Septe mber 30 , 2015

.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Bridget Holloway



### B RIDGET 

### H OLLOWAY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

Harris County Criminal Justice Center

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755

- 5826

Texas Bar No. 240 25227

holloway_bridget@dao.hctx.net

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This certifies the undersigned attorney requested that a copy of this

document be served to appellant’s attorney s via TexFile at the follo wing email on

October 30, 2015 :

Nicole D eBorde

Defense Attorney

Email: nicole@bsdlawfirm.com

/s/ Bridget Holloway



### B RIDGET 

### H OLLOWAY

Assistant District Attorney

Harris County, Texas

Harris County Criminal Justice Center

1201 Franklin, Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002

(713) 755

- 5826

Texas Bar No. 24025227

holloway_bridget@dao.hctx.net