alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.320 Provisions sought for the public interest. The following are types of provisions may be sought for the vindication of the public interest: ( a ) Elimination of discriminatory housing practices.
( b ) Prevention of future discriminatory housing practices.
( c ) Remedial affirmative activities to overcome discriminatory housing practices.
( d ) Reporting requirements.
( e ) Monitoring and enforcement activities.
#### Star Construction Corp., Respondent, v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

Order, entered on November 29, 1960, staying defendant Robertson Co. from taking depositions and taking any proceedings in an action pending in United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, unanimously reversed upon the law and upon the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to stay proceedings is in all respects denied, with $10 costs. It is consistently held that, as a matter of law, a State court should not, in an action pending therein, stay or restrain a party therein from proceeding with or in an action in a Federal court *(Penn Co.*v. *Pennsylvania,*294 U. S. 189, 195; *Princess Lida*v. *Thompson,*305 U. S. 456, 465-466; *Beardslee*v. *Ingraham,*183 N. Y. 411, 417; *Admiral Corp.*v. *Reines Distrs.,*9 A D 2d 410, affd. 8 N Y 2d 773). Furthermore, under the circumstances here, it is very proper that.the United States District Court action between the same parties should be tried before the trial of the action pending in this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
§ 1006.20 Grants for affordable housing activities. ( a ) *Annual grant.* Each fiscal year, HUD will make a grant (to the extent that amounts are made available) under the Act to the DHHL to carry out affordable housing activities for Native Hawaiian families who are eligible to reside on the Hawaiian Home Lands, if: ( 1 ) The Director has submitted to HUD a housing plan for that fiscal year; and
( 2 ) HUD has determined that the housing plan complies with the requirements of § 1006.101.
( b ) *Waiver.* HUD may waive housing plan requirements if HUD finds that the DHHL has not complied or cannot comply with those requirements due to circumstances beyond the control of the DHHL.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2883 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2883

      To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Chloro-o-Nitro Aniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Chloro-o-Nitro Aniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-CHLORO-O-NITRO ANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.07      Benzamine, 4        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Chloro 2 Nitro                                                     31/2008
                         (CAS No. 89-63-4)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2921.42.55)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 100.304 Housing for persons who are 55 years of age or older. ( a ) The provisions regarding familial status in this part shall not apply to housing intended and operated for persons 55 years of age or older. Housing qualifies for this exemption if: ( 1 ) The alleged violation occurred before December 28, 1995 and the housing community or facility complied with the HUD regulations in effect at the time of the alleged violation; or
( 2 ) The alleged violation occurred on or after December 28, 1995 and the housing community or facility complies with: ( i ) Section 807(b)(2)(C) (42 U.S.C. 3607(b)) of the Fair Housing Act as amended; and
( ii ) 24 CFR 100.305, 100.306, and 100.307.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, *housing facility or community* means any dwelling or group of dwelling units governed by a common set of rules, regulations or restrictions. A portion or portions of a single building shall not constitute a housing facility or community. Examples of a housing facility or community include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) A condominium association;
( 2 ) A cooperative;
( 3 ) A property governed by a homeowners' or resident association;
( 4 ) A municipally zoned area;
( 5 ) A leased property under common private ownership;
( 6 ) A mobile home park; and
( 7 ) A manufactured housing community.
( c ) For purposes of this subpart, *older person* means a person 55 years of age or older.
[64 FR 16329, Apr. 2, 1999]
### §5617. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5617 was editorially reclassified as section 11117 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Use of Court Orders To Place Juveniles in Secure Facilities, Jails and Lockups for Adults; Investigation and Report

Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7295, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4462, directed Comptroller General of the United States, not later than 180 days after Nov. 18, 1988, to conduct an investigation of extent to which valid court orders and court orders other than valid court orders, used in the 5-year period ending on Dec. 31, 1988, to place juveniles in secure detention facilities, in secure correctional facilities, and in jails and lockups for adults, and submit, not later than 3 years after Nov. 18, 1988, a report to certain congressional committees of results of investigation.
January 29, 2010

UNITED STATES

D

I

S

TRICT COURT

NORTHERN

DIST

RICT

OF CALIFORNIA

IT

IS

SO

ORDERED

Judge

Charles R. Breyer
Exhibit 10.1


 


November 1, 2010


 


Robert Giambrone


KBW, Inc.


787
7th Avenue


New
York, NY 10019


 


Re:
Notice of Non-Extension of Change of Control Agreement (“Notice”)


 


Dear
Mr. Giambrone:


 


Reference
is made to the Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement (the “Agreement”),
entered into by and between you and KBW, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), dated as of December 31, 2008. All capitalized terms
used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the definitions used in the
Agreement.


 


Under
Section 1(b) of the Agreement, on each anniversary of the date
of the Agreement (the “Renewal Date”), the term of the Agreement
automatically extends to terminate on the third anniversary of such Renewal
Date unless, at least 60 days prior to the Renewal Date, the Company delivers
notice to you stating that it elects not to extend the Change of Control
Period. Under the Agreement, the next Renewal Date will be December 31,
2010 (the “Upcoming Renewal Date”).


 


This
letter constitutes Notice to you, delivered in accordance with Section 1(b) and
Section 11 of the Agreement, that the Change of Control Period
shall not be extended and, accordingly, the term of the Agreement will be
scheduled to expire on December 31, 2012, subject to earlier termination
in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.


 


Please
execute this letter to acknowledge your receipt of this notice and return one
such executed original copy to the Company.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  KBW, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Mitchell B. Kleinman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Mitchell B. Kleinman

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
  EVP, General Counsel

  



 


 


I
hereby acknowledge receipt of this Notice, properly delivered to me.


 


	
   

  	
  /s/
  Robert Giambrone

  
	
   

  	
  Robert
  Giambrone
### §8235b. Applications for approval of plans for prototype residential energy efficiency programs

Each application for the approval of a plan under section 8235a(a) of this title for the establishment of a prototype residential energy efficiency program shall be submitted by a State or local government and shall include, at least—

(1) a description of the plan, including the provisions of the plan specified in section 8235a(a) of this title and a description of the portion of the service area of the public utility proposing to enter into a contract under section 8235a(a)(1) of this title which is designated under the contract;

(2) a description of the manner in which the provisions of the plan specified in section 8235a(a) of this title are to be met;

(3) a description of the contract to be entered into pursuant to section 8235a(a)(1) of this title and the manner in which the requirements of the contract contained in section 8235a(b) of this title are to be met;

(4) the record of the public hearing conducted pursuant to section 8235c(a)(2) of this title; and

(5) any other information determined by the Secretary to be necessary to carry out this part.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title II, §263, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §562, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 748.)
Promissory Note

U.S. $75,000	                                    November 01, 2010

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Peer Review Mediation &
Arbitration, Inc. (the "Borrower") hereby promises to pay Arnold J.
Diamond (the "Lender"), the principal sum of sixty five thousand
dollars ($75,000).  The principal amount of the Note shall be due and
payable in five (5) quarterly installments of fifteen thousand dollars
($15,000) first payment due January 15, 2011.  The Note shall not bear
interest. This Note may be prepaid at the option of the Borrower.

This Note shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws
of the state of Florida, without regard to its conflicts of laws rules.
Borrower waives presentment, demand, notice, protest and all other
demands and notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance,
performance, default and enforcement of this Note.

This Note may not be changed, amended or modified except by agreement
in writing signed by Borrower and the Lender.

Except as otherwise provided in this Note, all of the covenants,
conditions, and provisions of this Note shall be binding upon the
parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives
executors, administrators, successors, and assigns.

Should the Borrower default in payment, the Borrower shall pay all
costs, expenses and all reasonable legal costs incurred by the Lender,
for the purpose of collection of this Promissory Note and including
reasonable collection charges should collection be referred to a
collection agency.   These costs will be added to the outstanding
principal and will become immediately due. Borrower grants a security
interest in the assets of Key Vista PEO, Inc.

The parties acknowledge that no breach of any provision of the Note
shall be deemed waived unless evidenced in writing.   A waiver of any
one breach shall not be deemed a waiver of any other breach of the same
or any other provision of the Note.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and Lender have caused this Note to be
signed as of the day and year first above written.

BORROWER

Peer Review Mediation & Arbitration, Inc.

By:		 /s/Willis Hale
             --------------------
Name:		 Willis Hale


LENDER


By:		/s/Arnold J. Diamond
            ---------------------
Name:       Arnold J. Diamond
### COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00134-CV SO SON HARABEDOFF AND SO SON HARABEDOFF AS EXECUTOR OF ESTATE OF U\RRY R. HARABEDOFF, DECEASED FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT FUND V. APPELLANT

APPELLEE

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ORDER On May 1, 2013, we sentthe parties a lettersuggesting thatthis case may 

### be appropriate forreferral to an alternative dispute resolution procedure. On May 13, 2013, appellee filed a written objection to the proposed referral. Because we 

### havedeterminedthatthere is a reasonable basisforthe objection, we sustainthe objection.The clerk's record and reporter's record are due on or before Monday, May 20, 2013. The clerk ofthis court is directed to transmit a copy ofthis order to the 

### attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter. DATED May 14, 2013.
PER CURIAM
§ 180.305 Representation. ( a ) HUD is represented by the General Counsel.
( b ) Any party may appear on his/her/its own behalf or by an attorney. Each party or attorney shall file a notice of appearance. The notice must identify the matter before the ALJ, the party on whose behalf the appearance is made, and the mailing address and telephone number of the person appearing. Similar notice shall also be given for any withdrawal of appearance.
( c ) An attorney must be admitted to practice before a Federal Court or the highest court in any State. The attorney's representation that he/she is in good standing before any of these courts is sufficient evidence of the attorney's qualifications under this section, unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ.
#### WALLACE v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 3, 1905.)

Pebsonal Injuries—Pleading and Evidence.

Admission of evidence in a personal injury case that certain injuries were permanent is error, where such fact is not pleaded.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District.

Action by William Wallace against the New York City Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed on condition of remittitur.

Argued before SCOTT, GIEGERICH, and McCALL, JJ.

*767William E. Weaver, for appellant.

Ernest M. Welch, for respondent.

SCOTT, J.

The defendant in ■ this case admitted its liability, and the only question to be determined was as to the amount of damages. The justice erroneously admitted evidence tending to show that certain injuries suffered by plaintiff were permanent, although that fact was not pleaded. We are bound to assume that the evidence thus erroneously admitted enhanced the verdict to some extent, although, of course, we cannot tell precisely by how much.

We think that the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff will stipulate to reduce the judgment to $226.50, in which case the judgment as modified will be affirmed, without costs. If plaintiff is willing to accept a judgment for damages as thus reduced, the defendant should be satisfied to be charged no more for its admitted liability.

GIEGERICH, J.

(concurring). The evidence, aside from any testimony as to the permanency of the injuries, certainly shows damage to the amount proposed to be allowed. If a less sum had been awarded by the jury, it would have been our duty to reverse because of the inadequacy of judgment. Hence the defendant has no ground of complaint against the modification. As to the plaintiff, if he feels the amount allowed is too small, he can refuse to accept it, and have a new trial.

McCALL, J., concurs in the result.
#### § 309.7 Designation.

The Chief Financial Officer is delegated authority and designated to perform all the duties for which the Director is responsible under the forgoing statutes and joint regulations.
### §8235g. Records and reports

#### (a) Records

Each State and local government submitting any application for a plan which is approved under section 8235a(a) of this title, and each public utility and person or persons entering into a contract under such a plan, shall keep such records and make such reports as the Secretary may require. The Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States shall have access, at reasonable times and under reasonable conditions, to any books, documents, papers, records, and reports of each such State and local government, utility, and person or persons which the Secretary determines, in consultation with the Comptroller General of the United States, are pertinent to this part.

#### (b) Reports

The Secretary shall make an annual report to the President on the activities carried out under this part which shall be submitted to the Congress with the annual report on the activities of the Department of Energy required by section 7267 of this title and which shall contain—

(1) an estimate of the total amount of energy saved as a result of the activities carried out under this part;

(2) an estimate of the annual savings in energy anticipated as a result of each prototype residential energy efficiency program established under a plan approved under section 8235a(a) of this title;

(3) an analysis, developed in consultation with the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice, of the impact on competition of each prototype residential energy efficiency program established under a plan approved under section 8235a(a) of this title; and

(4) if the Secretary determines that it is appropriate, an analysis of the impact of expanding the approval of plans under section 8235a(a) of this title to establish prototype residential energy efficiency programs, and the provision of financial assistance to such programs, on a national basis and an assessment of the alternative methods by which such an expansion could be accomplished.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title II, §268, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §562, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 750.)
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.121 Requirements and effectiveness. ( a ) Multifamily mortgagees, which are required by 24 CFR part 207 to report mortgage delinquencies, defaults, reinstatements, assignment elections, withdrawals of assignment elections, and related information, must submit this information electronically, over the Internet, in accordance with the following schedule of effectiveness: ( 1 ) Mortgagees having 70 or more insured mortgage loans must comply with this section by no later than March 1, 1999;
( 2 ) Mortgagees having from 26 to 69 insured mortgage loans must comply with this section by no later than January 1, 2000;
( 3 ) Mortgagees having from 11 to 25 insured mortgage loans must comply with this section by no later than January 1, 2001;
( 4 ) Mortgagees having 10 or fewer insured mortgage loans must comply with this section by no later than January 1, 2002.
( b ) *Exception.* On or after January 1, 2002, mortgagees that hold or service fewer than 10 multifamily mortgages may continue to report mortgage delinquencies, defaults, reinstatements, assignment elections, withdrawals of assignment elections, and related information in writing on Form HUD-92426 only with specific HUD approval. HUD will grant such approval, upon application by the mortgagee, for reasons of hardship due to insufficient financial resources to purchase the required hardware and Internet access.
( c ) HUD will not accept reports of information regarding defaults, reinstatements, assignment elections, and related information in a manner that is not in accordance with this section. Failure on the part of mortgagees to report this information as required by 24 CFR part 207 and this section may result in HUD's application of the sanctions and surcharges specified in 24 CFR part 207.
§ 213.257 Premiums; purchasing cooperatives; Existing Construction; supplementary loans to purchase existing community facility. ( a ) Where a mortgage is endorsed for insurance pursuant to the sale of an Investor Sponsor Project or covers Existing Construction not involving Commissioner approved or required repairs, improvements, alterations and additions, the mortgagee, on the date of the insurance endorsement, shall pay a first premium equal to one-half of one percent of the principal obligation of the mortgage for the period from the date of the insurance endorsement to one year following the date of the first principal payment. On the anniversary of the first principal payment, this first premium shall be adjusted to equal one-half of one percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage for the period from the date of the insurance endorsement to one year following the date of the first principal payment.
( b ) The premium provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall apply to a supplementary loan to purchase an existing community facility.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, HAS
BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE MERGER WITH M-R GROUP PLC UNDER THE PURCHASE METHOD
OF ACCOUNTING.  SUCH MERGER WAS ORIGINALLY ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING OF
INTERESTS IN THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FILED WITH FORM 10-Q ON NOVEMBER 15,
1999.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,109
<PP&E>                                         125,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 824,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,078
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           180
<OTHER-SE>                                     462,491
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   824,234
<SALES>                                        374,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               374,440
<CGS>                                          236,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               103,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,868
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,858
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,010
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74


</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00235

- CV

I N THE M ATTER OF C.O., A J UVENILE §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 323rd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 323

- 115526

- 21 )

December 16, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is a ffirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell