alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 103.5 Other civil rights authorities.

In addition to the Fair Housing Act, other civil rights authorities may be applicable in a particular case. Thus, where a person charged with a discriminatory housing practice in a complaint filed under section 810 of the Fair Housing Act is also prohibited from engaging in similar practices under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-2000d-5), section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5309), Executive Order 11063 of November 20, 1962, on Equal Opportunity in Housing (27 FR 11527-11530, November 24, 1962), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), the Age Discrimination Act (42 U.S.C. 6101) or other applicable law, the person may also be subject to action by HUD or other Federal agencies under the rules, regulations, and procedures prescribed under title VI (24 CFR parts 1 and 2), section 109 (24 CFR 570.602)), Executive Order 11063 (24 CFR part 107), section 504 (24 CFR part 8), or other applicable law.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**GMH COMMUNITIESTRUST**

**CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

I, Gary M. Holloway, Sr.,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of GMH Communities Trust, aMaryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), hereby certify that, tomy knowledge:

(1)   The Company’sannual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

*  *  *
| /s/ GARY  M. HOLLOWAY, SR.                  |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Gary M. Holloway, Sr.                       |   |   |
| Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                    |   |   |

 

Date: March 16, 2007

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09076]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Ninth Meeting: RTCA Tactical Operations Committee (TOC)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Ninth meeting notice of RTCA Tactical Operations Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
seventh meeting of the RTCA Tactical Operations Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 20th from 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES:  The meetings will be held at National Business Aviation 
Association 1200 G Street NW., Suite 1100 Washington DC 20005 (202) 
783-9000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or Trin 
Mitra, TOC Secretary, tmitra@rtca.org, 202-330-0655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the RTCA Tactical Operations Committee. 
The agenda will include the following:

May 20th

     Opening of Meeting/Introduction of TOC Members--Co Chairs 
Jim Bowman and Dale Wright
     Official Statement of Designated Federal Official--
Elizabeth Ray
     Approval of February 5, 2015 Meeting Summary
     Recommendation from GPS Adjacent Band Compatibility Task 
Group: Feedback on Exclusion Zones--Bob Lamond and Paul McDuffee
     Briefing from FAA on National Special Activity Airspace 
Program (NSAAP)--Rob Hunt
     Review Terms of Reference for Airport Construction Task 
and National Procedures Assessment Initiative Task
     Updates from Ongoing Tasks
     Anticipated Issues for TOC consideration and action at the 
next meeting
     Other business
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 15, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-09076 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. IA-5633]

# ADDRESSES:

                        The Commission:                         *Secretarys-Office@sec.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christine Ayako Schleppegrell, Senior Counsel, at 202-551-6727; SEC, Division of Investment Management, Investment Adviser Regulation Office, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-8549.

                            For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, pursuant to delegated authority.[2] 

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Rule 204-1 under the Act requires any adviser that is required to complete Form ADV to amend the form at least annually and to submit the amendments electronically through the Investment Adviser Registration Depository.                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                                     17 CFR 200.30-5(e)(2).                            
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2020-26113 Filed 11-24-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.212 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Commissioner* means the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner, or the Commissioner's delegates and designees.

*Controlling Participant* means an individual or entity serving in a capacity for a Covered Project that makes the individual or entity subject to Previous Participation review under this subpart, as further described in § 200.216.

*Covered Project* means a project in which the participation of a Controlling Participant is conditioned on Previous Participation review under this subpart, as further described in § 200.214.

*Previous Participation* means a Controlling Participant's previous participation in Covered Projects, and, if applicable, other federal, state and local housing programs, in accordance with the definition of Risk.

*Risk.* In order to determine whether a Controlling Participant's participation in a project would constitute an unacceptable risk, the Commissioner must determine whether the Controlling Participant could be expected to participate in the Covered Project in a manner consistent with furthering the Department's purposes. The Commissioner's review of Previous Participation shall consider compliance with applicable statutes, regulations and program requirements. The Commissioner must consider the Controlling Participant's previous financial and operational performance in Covered Projects that may indicate a financial or operating risk in approving the Controlling Participant's participation in the subject Triggering Event. At the Commissioner's discretion, as necessary to determine financial or operating risk and to the extent the Commissioner determines such information to be reliably available, the Commissioner may consider the Controlling Participant's participation and performance in any federal, state or local government program. The Commissioner may exclude any Previous Participation the Commissioner determines to be of limited value, unreliable or irrelevant in evaluating risk and/or any Previous Participation in which the Controlling Participant did not exercise, actually or constructively, control. Any information collection in connection with review of Previous Participation must follow all applicable requirements for information collection.

*Triggering Event* means an occurrence in connection with a Covered Project that subjects a Controlling Participant to Previous Participation review under this subpart, as further described in § 200.218.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BERNARD OSHER TRUST,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CITY OF ALAMEDA,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C09-1437 SI (JCS)

ORDER TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENTS IN .PDF

FORMAT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in addition to the submission of paper copy of settlement

conference statements to chambers, each party shall submit their confidential updated settlement

conference statements in .pdf format and email their statement to JCSPO@cand.uscourts.gov,

along with a .pdf of any previous settlement conference statement(s).

All other provisions of this Court's original Notice and Settlement Conference Order remain

in effect.

Dated: February 8, 2010

_______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01437-SI Document 44 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 1
From: Dines, Jennifer [mailto:Jennifer.Dines@epa.state.oh.us] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 7:02 AM 

To: Aburano, Douglas 

Subject: PM2.5 Redesignation Supplemental Inventory Information for Ohio 

Attachments: Canton winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

Parkersburg winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

Steubenville winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

Cleveland winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

Columbus winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

wheeling winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

Dayton winsum_OH cy 2007.xlsx 

winsum__allstates.state.2005.csv 

winsum__allstates.state.2007.csv 

winsum__allstates.state.2018.csv

Doug, in addition to the inventories we have already submitted for direct PM, NOx and SO2, we are submitting

the attached inventory information for ammonia and VOCs as a supplement.  This data was generated from

LADCO county level VOC and ammonia emissions inventories for 2007.  I have attached the complete files as

well as files with only information for the nonattainment area counties.  The following links are associated with

the attached inventories: inventory page (http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/current/index.php), the county

specific file (http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/basecv8/annual/winsum__allstates.cy.2007.csv) and the

inventory documentation

(http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/basecv8/Base_C_Emissions_Documentation_Sept_12.pdf

With the supplement of these inventories, Ohio should now meet the comprehensive emissions inventory

requirement of the Clean Air Act as it applies to ammonia and VOCs for the Ohio nonattainment areas.

Thank you, Jennifer

Jennifer Dines

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Wk (614) 644‐3696

Fax (614) 644‐3681
#### Sam Rosenbaum v. First National City Bank of New York.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
§ 103.500 Prompt judicial action. ( a ) If at any time following the filing of a complaint, the General Counsel concludes that prompt judicial action is necessary to carry out the purposes of this part or 24 CFR part 180, the General Counsel may authorize the Attorney General to commence a civil action for appropriate temporary or preliminary relief pending final disposition of the complaint. To ensure the prompt initiation of the civil action, the General Counsel will consult with the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division before making the determination that prompt judicial action is necessary. The commencement of a civil action by the Attorney General under this section will not affect the initiation or continuation of proceedings under this part or administrative proceedings under part 180.
( b ) If the General Counsel has reason to believe that a basis exists for the commencement of proceedings against the respondent under section 814(a) of the Fair Housing Act (Pattern or Practice Cases), proceedings under section 814(c) of the Fair Housing Act (Enforcement of Subpoenas), or proceedings by any governmental licensing or supervisory authorities, the General Counsel shall transmit the information upon which that belief is based to the Attorney General and to other appropriate authorities.
[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996]
#### § 234.274 Certificate of tax assessment.

The mortgagee shall certify, as of the date of filing for record of the deed or assignment of the mortgage to the Commissioner, that the family unit is assessed and subject to assessment for taxes pertaining only to that unit.
#### § 203.610 Relief for mortgagor in military service.

The mortgagee shall specifically give consideration to affording the mortgagor the benefit of relief authorized by §§ 203.345 and 203.346, if the mortgagor is *person in the military service* as that term is defined in the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940, as amended.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LE WANG,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 71976

Agency No. A097

- 873

- 011

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Le Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denyi ng his motion to reopen removal

proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder , 597

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 14 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 71976

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in par t the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Wang’s second motion to

reopen as untimely and numerically barred where he filed it nine years after the

BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where he failed to demonstrate

materially changed country conditions in China to qualify for an exception to the

time and num erical limitations for motion s to reopen

, s ee 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi , 597 F.3d at 99 0

- 91 (evidence must be “qualitatively

different” to warrant reopening). We reject Wang’s contention that the BIA did

not properly evaluate all of his evidence.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s de cision not to reopen proceedings

sua sponte

. See Bonill a v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) ( “[T]his court

has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the

limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or

constitutional error.” )

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
#### Powers *v.*Powers.

April 10, 1912.

Atkinson, J.

1. The marriage of a boy in his sixteenth year, although declared by the Code to be void in the sense of being absolutely void, may nevertheless be ratified and confirmed by continuing, after arriving at the age of seventeen years, to cohabit with his wife as such. *Smith*v. *Smith,*84 *Ga.*440 (11 S. E. 496, 8 L. R. A. 362); *Luke*v. *Hill,*137 *Ga.*159 (73 S. E. 345).

2. The evidence in the present case was sufficient to authorize a finding that the defendant below was only in his sixteenth year at the time of the marriage ceremony between him and the plaintiff, duly performed by a justice of the peace in pursuance of a marriage license; but that he continued to cohabit with the plaintiff as his wife for several months after he had arrived at the age of seventeen years. Accordingly, the judge did not err in holding that the inchoate and imperfect marriage between the plaintiff and the defendant had been completed and confirmed by such cohabitation by them as man and wife, and that the defendant was the lawful husband of the plaintiff.

3. The foregoing rulings deal with the only assignments of error made in the bill of exceptions. It follows that the judge did not err in awarding temporary alimony and attorney’s fees to the plaintiff below, it appearing that she and the defendant were living in a bona fide state of sep- ■ aration at the time of the application for alimony, and at the time of the judgment excepted to.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*66Alimony, etc. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. November 24, 1911.

*Claud Estes*and *Walter Defore,*for plaintiff in error.

*C. H. Hall Jr.,*contra.
# National African American History Month, 2004

During National African American History Month, we honor the heritage and accomplishments of African Americans and recognize their extraordinary contributions to the United States.

African Americans have upheld the ideals of America, defended our homeland, and enriched American culture and society. Brave leaders such as Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, Booker T. Washington, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Leon Sullivan caused America to examine its heart and to respect the dignity and equality of all people, regardless of race. Today, African Americans are leaders at the highest levels of the military, business, education, law, government, the arts, sports, and religion.

To help share the stories of the millions of African Americans who have strengthened our country, I recently signed legislation establishing the National Museum of African American History and Culture as a part of the Smithsonian Institution. This museum will commemorate the triumphs of African Americans—their determination in overcoming the evil of slavery and discrimination and their many achievements and contributions to our Nation.

This year's National African American History Month celebrates the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education. In that landmark decision, the Supreme Court declared an end to the shameful and unconstitutional practice of legal segregation in schools, ruling unanimously that the Constitution requires all Americans to be treated equally without regard to the color of their skin. The Brown decision transformed America and fulfilled the principles of our Constitution. This year, we remember the brave schoolchildren and parents who challenged segregation. We recognize the legal and moral advocates who paved the way for this decision, including Thurgood Marshall, the heroic lawyer who represented Linda Brown and fought for her rights and the rights of all African Americans. We remember the nine justices of the Supreme Court who helped America begin to make equal justice under law a reality for African Americans. Nearly 50 years after Brown, we are grateful for the progress America has made, but we also recognize that there is still work to be done to ensure that our country lives up to the founding principle that all of God's children are created equal.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 2004 as National African American History Month. I call upon public officials, educators, librarians, and all the people of the United States to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities that highlight and honor the contributions African Americans have made to our Nation.                              ( print page 5904)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-eighth. 

[FR Doc. 04-2790

Billing code 3195-01-P
No. 89-6952.

#### Mami *v.*Van Zandt, Superintendent, Hudson Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Harry Lee, Deceased. Emil L. Lane et al., Appellants; Pearl Adler, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal from decree entered April 4, 1960 granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion to dismiss appeal from order entered June 15, 1959 granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §7651e. Allowances for States with emissions rates at or below 0.80 lbs/mmBtu

#### (a) Election of Governor

In addition to basic Phase II allowance allocations, upon the election of the Governor of any State, with a 1985 state-wide annual sulfur dioxide emissions rate equal to or less than, 0.80 lbs/mmBtu, averaged over all fossil fuel-fired utility steam generating units, beginning January 1, 2000, and for each calendar year thereafter until and including 2009, the Administrator shall allocate, in lieu of other Phase II bonus allowance allocations, allowances from the reserve created pursuant to section 7651d(a)(2) of this title to all such units in the State in an amount equal to 125,000 multiplied by the unit's pro rata share of electricity generated in calendar year 1985 at fossil fuel-fired utility steam units in all States eligible for the election.

#### (b) Notification of Administrator

Pursuant to section 7651b(a)(1) of this title, each Governor of a State eligible to make an election under paragraph 1 (a) shall notify the Administrator of such election. In the event that the Governor of any such State fails to notify the Administrator of the Governor's elections, the Administrator shall allocate allowances pursuant to section 7651d of this title.

#### (c) Allowances after January 1, 2010

After January 1, 2010, the Administrator shall allocate allowances to units subject to the provisions of this section pursuant to section 7651d of this title.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title IV, §406, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title IV, §401, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2613.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "subsection".