alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


ATLANTIC SOUTHERN BANK (F/K/A NEW SOUTHERN BANK)


SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT


DATED DECEMBER 15, 2005


FOR


BRANDON L. MERCER


 


THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT is adopted this
         day of
                                ,
20    , by and between ATLANTIC SOUTHERN BANK (f/k/a New
Southern Bank), a state-chartered commercial bank located in Macon, Georgia
(the “Company”), and Brandon L. Mercer (the “Executive”).


 


The
Company and the Executive executed the Salary Continuation Agreement on December 15,
2005 (the “Agreement”).


 


The
undersigned hereby amend the Agreement for the purpose of changing the
respective benefit amounts due upon Separation from Service or death to be Zero
Dollars ($0.00).  Pursuant to Section 7.1
of the Agreement, the parties mutually agree to this amendment and no further
consideration shall be exchanged by the parties in lieu of the benefits
voluntarily relinquished by the Executive hereunder.


 


Therefore,
the following changes shall be made:


 


Sections 2.1.1, 2.2.1, 2.3.1, 2.4.1 and 3.1.1 of the Agreement shall be
deleted in their entirety and replaced by the following:


 


2.1.1                     Amount of Benefit.  The annual benefit under this Section 2.1
is Zero Dollars ($0.00).


 


2.2.1                     Amount
of Benefit.  The annual
benefit under this Section 2.2 is Zero Dollars ($0.00).


 


2.3.1                     Amount of Benefit.  The annual benefit under this Section 2.3
is Zero Dollars ($0.00).


 


2.4.1                     Amount of Benefit.  The annual benefit under this Section 2.4
is Zero Dollars ($0.00).


 


3.1.1                     Amount of Benefit.  The benefit under this Section 3.1 is
Zero Dollars ($0.00).


 


Schedule A shall be deleted in its entirety.


 

















 


IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Company and the
Executive hereby consent to this First Amendment.


 


	
  Executive:

  	
  Company:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ATLANTIC
  SOUTHERN BANK

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
   

  
	
  Brandon
  L. Mercer

  	
  Title
#### Victor Tosado, Jr., v. Oliver Fitchett.

Motion for leave to serve and file an abbreviated record on appeal denied, without prejudice to an application in the court below. Motion for leave to appeal as poor person? granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, upon condition that the appellants serve one *919copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorney for respondent and fide 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points with this court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) County 
Supervisor Report (5) Vote on Reglan Ridge Project, (6) Status of 
Committee Assignments, (7) Report of Projects Funded, (8) General 
Discussion, (9) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 13, 2005, from 9 a.m. and 
end at approximately 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, 
Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals 
wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and 
proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 
95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d3a3a3c39393433341d3b2e733b383973282e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294e4e484d4d404740694f5a074f4c4d075c5a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by January 10, 2005, will have 
the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: December 21, 2004.
Robert McCabe,
Acting Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 04-28304 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2839 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2839

          To extend the duty suspension on 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-
                         methylphenyl)proponal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2005

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the duty suspension on 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-
                         methylphenyl)proponal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,2-DIMETHYL-3-(3-METHYLPHENYL)PROPONAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.39 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-
methylphenyl)proponal) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: November 20, 2012

TO: RICE NESHAP Docket, EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

FROM: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

SUBJECT: November 19, 2012 Meeting Regarding Proposed Amendments to the RICE 

NESHAP and RICE NESHAP/NSPS Implementation Q&A Document

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between the EPA and the attendees listed below on November 19, 

2012 to discuss INGAA’s comments on the proposed amendments to the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion 

Engines (RICE), the rulemaking schedule, and the Questions and Answers Document published 

in July 2012. The amendments were proposed on June 7, 2012. The meeting agenda is attached.

ATTENDEES

Bob Wayland, EPA Lisa Beal, INGAA

Melanie King, EPA Jim McCarthy, IES

Michael Horowitz, EPA (by phone) Charles Wait, Energy Transfer
Agenda

Interstate Natural Gas Association of America and EPA

Meeting on RICE NESHAP Status and Implementation Q&A Document

12:30 – 1:00, Monday, November 19, 2012

1. RICE NESHAP Rulemaking Schedule Status (December 14, 2012 signature deadline)

• Comments received and implications for schedule and final rule content

2. INGAA Comments on Proposed Subpart ZZZZ

• Any EPA questions on INGAA Comments?

• INGAA comments 6 and 7 on emergency engines – operator defined procedures for 

maintenance tests and readiness testing; “deviation” from 100 hour operating limit. 

• Potential for other minor technical corrections (INGAA comment 9) – several items 

listed, including SSMP, onsite records, ΔP measurements, etc. 

3. EPA RICE NESHAP and NSPS Implementation Q&A Document

• Potential for additional EPA revisions to the document – INGAA may provide comments 

and list additional items that could be added to facilitate implementation

• Example INGAA issues: 

- INGAA August 9 comments did not address “onsite buildings” for remote engine 

definition. Will this be addressed in Final Rule or in Q&A document?

- Q&A #21 and inconsistencies with typical CPMS programming for units complying 

with Subpart ZZZZ.

- Q&A #12 appears to conflict with §63.10(b) and minor rule revision may be 

warranted – see INGAA comment 9 regarding onsite records

- Several Q&A’s related to ΔP measurement, and timing and approval process for

catalyst replacement tests and temporary catalysts 

4. Plans for any “next steps” (e.g., INGAA comments on Q&A document)

Planned INGAA Attendees 

Lisa Beal

Charles Wait (Energy Transfer)

Jim McCarthy (IES Inc.)
#### In the Matter of Grace Abbattista, Appellant, v Arthur Levitt, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 10, 1976, which dismissed petitioner’s application in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioner seeks to annul the determination of the Comptroller disallowing an application for a $20,000 ordinary death benefit. The facts are not in dispute and we are concerned only with a question of law. Petitioner’s husband became a member of the New York State Employees’ Retirement System on July 1, 1964. On September 7, 1972 he was granted leave of absence to December 7, 1972, on which date the leave was extended indefinitely without pay because of illness. On March 11, 1974 decedent returned to work and he died on May 25, 1974. Thereafter his widow, petitioner, applied for ordinary death benefits pursuant to section 60-a of the Retirement and Social Security Law. This application was denied on the ground that her husband did not render 90 days of continuous service in the service of his employer during the 15-month period immediately preceding his death. She was awarded the sum of $11,881.19 and it is the difference between this sum and the $20,000 which petitioner seeks. Subdivision (a) of section 60-b of the Retirement and Social Security Law provides in pertinent part that to be entitled to ordinary death benefits a member must have "rendered ninety or more days of continuous service in the service of such participating employer during the fifteen month period immediately preceding death”. In substance, it is petitioner’s contention that since decedent was on leave of absence to March 11, 1974, that time must be considered as being in service, resulting in the required 90-day period. She relies heavily on *Matter of O’Marah v Levitt*(35 NY2d 593) as authority for her position. We arrive at a contrary conclusion. The *O’Marah*case is clearly distinguishable. That case was concerned with the two-year Statute of Limitations imposed for timely application for accidental disability retirement and the court determined that the time should run from the date the leave of absence expires. Here the statutory language is clear and unambiguous providing that as a prerequisite to entitlement one must have served 90 or more days continuously in service *691during the 15-month period preceding death. An interpretation that the period of a leave of absence constitutes time "in service” is unrealistic and, in our view, contrary to the plain language of the statute. Consequently, respondent’s determination that decedent did not have the required continuous 90 days in service must be sustained. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Description of Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.3 
 The following is a summary description of the arrangements with the Company’s non-employee members of the Board of Directors regarding their compensation effective as of October 27, 2010: 

Each non-employee director is paid an annual retainer of $60,000 for his or her services as a director. Each member of the Compensation Committee (other
than the Chairperson) receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000; and the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee receives an annual retainer of $25,000. Each member of the Audit Committee (other than the Chairperson) receives an additional
annual retainer of $10,000; and the Chairperson of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $25,000. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (other than the Chairperson) receives an additional annual retainer of
$10,000; and the Chairperson of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual retainer of $15,000. Each member of the Compliance Committee (other than the Chairperson) receives an additional annual retainer of $10,000; and the
Chairperson of the Compliance Committee receives an annual retainer of $20,000. Non-employee directors will also receive $1,500 for each Board meeting attended in excess of six Board meetings in a fiscal year, and each Committee member will receive
$1,500 for each Committee meeting attended in excess of six meetings in a year. 
 Each non-employee director will also receive an annual grant
of deferred stock units (“DSUs”) with a target value of $90,000, calculated based upon the average closing market price of the Company’s common stock during the month prior to the month in which the grant is made, but in no event to
exceed 15,000 DSUs. The lead independent director will also receive an additional annual grant of DSUs with a target value of $30,000, calculated in the same manner. These DSUs vest in four equal quarterly installments during the year following the
grant date, but may not be sold, and remain tax-deferred, until the earlier to occur of (i) three years after the date of grant, (ii) the director’s separation from service on the Board, (iii) the director’s death or disability, or (iv) a
change-in-control of Corinthian.
§ 108.20 Monitoring office responsibility for monitoring plans and reports. ( a ) *Submission of documentation.* Pursuant to initiation of marketing, the applicant shall submit to the monitoring office reports documenting the implementation of the AFHM plan, including sales or rental reports, as required by the Department. Copies of such documentation shall be forwarded to the civil rights/compliance reviewing office by the monitoring office as requested.
( b ) *Monitoring of AFHM plan.* The monitoring office is responsible for monitoring AFHM plans and providing technical assistance to the applicant in preparation or modification of such plans during the period of development and initial implementation.
( c ) *Review of applicant's reports.* Each sales or rental report shall be reviewed by the monitoring office as it is received. When sales or rental reports show that 20% of the units covered by the AFHM plan have been sold or rented, or whenever it appears that the plan may not accomplish its intended objective, the monitoring office shall notify the civil rights/compliance reviewing office.
( d ) *Failure of applicant to file documentation.* If the applicant fails to file required documentation, the applicant shall be sent a written notice indicating that if the delinquent documentation is not submitted to the monitoring office within 10 days from date of receipt of the notice, the matter will be referred to the civil rights/compliance reviewing office by the monitoring office for action which may lead to the imposition of sanctions.
[64 FR 44096, Aug. 12, 1999]
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Bionova HoldingCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003(the “Report”), I, Jose Manuel Garcia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  September 11, 2003 |                    |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                            |                    |   |
|                            | /s/ JOSE MANUEL GARCIA  |   |
|                            | Jose Manuel Garcia      |   |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77769-77770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28379]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Interior, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware & 
Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

DATES: Friday, January 14, 2005, time 1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Two Rivers Chamber Office, 1 South Third Street, 9th Floor, 
Easton, PA 18042.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was established to 
assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its political subdivisions 
in planning and implementing an integrated strategy for protecting and 
promoting cultural, historic and natural resources. The Commission 
reports to the Secretary of the Interior and to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage 
Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 100-692, November 18,

[[Page 77770]]

1988, and extended through Public Law 105-355, November 13, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Allen Sachse, Executive Director, 
Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission, 1 South Third 
Street, 8th Floor, Easton, PA 18042, (610) 923-3548.

    Dated: December 21, 2004.
C. Allen Sachse,
Executive Director, Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-28379 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
§ 203.7 Commitment process. For single family mortgage programs that are not eligible for Direct Endorsement processing under § 203.5, or for Lender Insurance processing under § 203.6, the mortgagee must submit an application for mortgage insurance in a form prescribed by the Secretary prior to making the mortgage loan. If: ( a ) A mortgage for a specified property has been accepted for insurance through issuance of a conditional commitment by the Secretary or a certificate of reasonable value by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and
( b ) A specified mortgagor and all other proposed terms and conditions of the mortgage meet the eligibility requirements for insurance as determined by the Secretary, the Secretary shall approve the application for insurance by issuing a firm commitment setting forth the terms and conditions of insurance.
[57 FR 58346, Dec. 9, 1992; 58 FR 13537, Mar. 12, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 30226, June 2, 1997]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2777 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2777

         To suspend temporarily the duty on oleoresin paprika.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on oleoresin paprika.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLEORESIN PAPRIKA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      oleoresin paprika   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 72968-48-                                                 31/2009
                         0 & 8001-22-7)
                         provided for in
                         subheading 3301-
                         90-10)...........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```