23294 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Notices 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. EPA will consider the 

comments received and amend the ICR 

as appropriate. The final ICR package 

will then be submitted to OMB for 

review and approval. At that time, EPA 

will issue another Federal Register 

notice to announce the submission of 

the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to 

submit additional comments to OMB. 

Abstract: EPA is required under 

Section 183(e) of the Clean Air Act to 

regulate Volatile Organic Compound 

(VOC) emissions from the use of 

consumer and commercial products. 

Under regulations promulgated on 

February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8428) 

manufacturers of new portable gasoline 

containers are required to obtain 

certificates of conformity with the Clean 

Air Act, effective January 1, 2009. This 

ICR covers the burdens associated with 

this certification process. EPA reviews 

information submitted in the 

application for certification to 

determine if the container design 

conforms to applicable requirements 

and to verify that the required testing 

has been performed. The certificate 

holder is required to keep records on the 

testing and collect and keep warranty 

and defect information for annual 

reporting on in-use performance of their 

products. The respondent must also 

retain records on the units produced, 

apply serial numbers to individual 

containers, and track the serial numbers 

to their certificates of conformity. Any 

information submitted for which a claim 

of confidentiality is made is safeguarded 

according to EPA regulations at 40 CFR 

2.201 et seq. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: 

manufacturers of new portable gasoline 

containers from 0.25 to 10.0 gallons in 

capacity. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

mandatory 40 CFR part 59, subpart F. 

Estimated number of respondents: 8 

(total). 

Frequency of response: yearly for 

warranty reports; at least once every five 

years for certificate renewals. 

Total estimated burden: 250 hours 

(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 

1320.3(b) 

Total estimated cost: $32,419.45 (per 

year), includes $20,452 annualized 

capital or operation & maintenance 

costs. 

Changes in Estimates: There is an 

increase of 37 hours in the total 

estimated respondent burden compared 

with the ICR currently approved by 

OMB. This increase of the estimated 

burden and cost estimates is due to a 

change in the estimated cost of labor 

and additional testing requirements for 

new portable fuel container families to 

comply with the requirements for 

evaporative testing promulgated in 40 

CFR part 59. 

Dated: April 14, 2016. 

Byron J. Bunker, 

Director, Compliance Division, Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air 

and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09156 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0393; FRL–9944–09] 

Aquashade, Nithiazine, d-limonene, 

and 2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol-3(4H)- 

one, 5,6-dihydro-2-methyl- (MTI) 

Registration Review Interim Decisions; 

Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s interim registration 

review decisions for the pesticides 

aquashade, nithiazine, d-limonene, and 

2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol-3(4H)-one, 

5,6-dihydro-2-methyl- (MTI). 

Registration review is EPA’s periodic 

review of pesticide registrations to 

ensure that each pesticide continues to 

satisfy the statutory standard for 

registration, that is, that the pesticide 

can perform its intended function 

without causing unreasonable adverse 

effects on human health or the 

environment. Through this program, 

EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s 

registration is based on current 

scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For pesticide specific information, 

contact: The Chemical Review Manager 

for the pesticide of interest identified in 

the Table in Unit II. For general 

information on the registration review 

program, contact: Richard Dumas, 

Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division 

(7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 308–8015; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

workers, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

pesticide specific contact person listed 

in the Table in Unit II. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

B. How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The docket for this action, identified 

by docket identification (ID) number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0393 is available 

at http://www.regulations.gov or at the 

Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 

Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. What action is the Agency taking? 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this 

notice announces the availability of 

EPA’s interim registration review 

decision for the pesticides found in the 

Table in this unit. 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW INTERIM DECISIONS

Registration review case 

name and No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone number, email address 

Aquashade (Case 4010) ...... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0639 Christina Motilall, motilall.christina@epa.gov, 

(703) 603–0522. 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Notices 23295 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW INTERIM DECISIONS—Continued 

Registration review case 

name and No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone number, email address 

Nithiazine (Case 7415) ........ EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0847 Brian Kettl, kettl.brian@epa.gov, 

(703) 347–0535. 

d-limonene (Case 3083) ...... EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0673 Caitlin Newcamp, newcamp.caitlin@epa.gov, 

(703) 347–0325. 

2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol3(4H)-one, 5,6-dihydro-2- 

methyl- (MTI) (Case 5018).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0266 Rachel Ricciardi, ricciardi.rachel@epa.gov, 

(703) 347–0465. 

Aquashade (Interim Decision). 

Aquashade is as an aquatic herbicide 

whose mode of action is light filtration. 

It is primarily used in small water 

bodies like ornamental ponds and small 

lakes, fountains and other landscaping 

water features, swimming holes, 

aquaculture ponds, and animal watering 

holes. The Ecological Risk Assessment 

found no level of concern risk 

exceedances to all taxa. The Human 

Health Risk Assessment also indicated 

no risk (dietary, residential, and 

occupational). Aquashade was not on 

either initial list of chemicals to be 

screened under the Endocrine Disruptor 

Screening Program (EDSP), and an 

endangered species assessment has not 

been conducted at this time. No 

mitigation is proposed at this time. The 

Agency’s final registration review 

decision is dependent upon the 

assessment of risks to threatened and 

endangered species and after an EDSP 

Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act 

(FFDCA) Section 408(p) determination 

has been made. 

Nithiazine (Interim Decision). The 

Nithiazine Summary Document was 

published on March 18, 2009. 

Nithiazine is used as part of a bait 

station to control flies in animal housing 

facilities and other industrial 

operations. The structure of the bait 

station makes contact between 

nithiazine and humans unlikely; 

therefore, there are no human health 

risk concerns for nithiazine. Since the 

active ingredient is contained in a bait 

station, no ecological exposure is 

expected. Therefore, there are no 

ecological risk concerns for nithiazine. 

Nithiazine does not pose a threat to 

pollinators and the Agency has 

determined that it will cause No Effect 

to listed species. The Agency has 

determined that no additional data are 

required at this time to support the 

continuing registrations of nithiazine 

products. The final decision on the 

registration review for nithiazine will 

occur after an EDSP FFDCA section 

408(p) determination has been made. 

d-Limonene (Interim Decision). The 

registration review docket for dlimonene opened in September 2010. dLimonene is a naturally occurring 

chemical obtained from the rind of 

citrus fruits. It is registered for use as an 

acaricide, insecticide, herbicide, insect 

repellent, and is used as an inert 

ingredient for scent and flavoring in 

other non-pesticide products. dLimonene is currently registered for use 

in/on food crops (citrus, pome fruits, 

grapes), feed crops, non-food crops 

(ornamentals, Christmas trees, 

fencerows, recreational areas, wood 

protection) and for residential uses. EPA 

published the draft human health and 

ecological risk assessments in December 

2014. A qualitative human health 

assessment was conducted, and the 

Agency concluded that d-limonene does 

not pose a risk to human health. A 

quantitative ecological risk assessment 

was conducted and levels of concern 

were exceeded for terrestrial plants and 

mammals (risks to birds and terrestrial 

invertebrates could not be precluded). 

The Agency is requiring modifications 

to several labels to reduce potential 

risks of d-limonene to terrestrial birds 

and mammals. In addition, the Agency 

will make several modifications to 40 

CFR part 180. The Agency will establish 

an exemption for the herbicidal uses of 

d-limonene from a tolerance under 

subpart D, and existing exemption from 

tolerances from the repellant uses of dlimonene under 180.539 subpart C will 

be moved to subpart D for insecticidal 

uses. This Interim Decision does not 

cover the EDSP component of this 

registration review case, nor does it 

include a complete endangered species 

assessment or pollinator risk 

assessment. The Agency’s final 

registration review decision is 

dependent upon the assessment of risks 

to threatened and endangered species 

and pollinators as well as a 

determination under FFDCA Section 

408(p) regarding endocrine disruption. 

2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol- 3(4H)-one, 

5,6-dihydro-2- methyl- (Interim 

Decision). There is one EPA registered 

product containing active ingredient 

2H-Cyclopent(d)isothiazol-3(4H)-one, 

5,6- dihydro-2- methyl-, also known as 

MTI. MTI is a materials preservative for 

use in the manufacture of aqueous 

compositions used in the manufacture 

of imaging products. The Agency did 

not require any additional data in 

support of MTI’s registration review or 

need to conduct human health or 

environmental risk assessments due to 

the lack of exposure concerns for MTI’s 

registered use. Based on the lack of 

potential exposure, the Agency made a 

‘‘no effect’’ determination for listed 

species under the Endangered Species 

Act (ESA). Except for the EDSP 

component of the MTI registration 

review case, the Agency is not requiring 

additional data and is not proposing any 

risk reduction measures for this case. 

The final decision on the registration 

review for MTI will occur after the 

EDSP FFDCA section 408(p) 

determination is made. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a 

registration review decision is the 

Agency’s determination whether a 

pesticide meets, or does not meet, the 

standard for registration in the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA). EPA has considered the 

pesticides found in the Table in this 

unit in light of the FIFRA standard for 

registration. The Interim Decision 

document in the dockets describes the 

Agency’s rationale for issuing a 

registration review interim decision for 

these pesticides. 

In addition to the interim registration 

review decision documents, the 

registration review dockets for the 

pesticides listed in the Table in this unit 

also includes other relevant documents 

related to the registration review of 

these cases. The proposed interim 

registration review decisions were 

posted to the docket and the public was 

invited to submit any comments or new 

information. 

EPA addresses the comments or 

information received during the 60-day 

comment period in the discussion for 

each pesticide listed in this document. 

During the 60-day comment period, no 

public comments were received for 

aquashade, nithiazine, or 2HCyclopent(d)isothiazol- 3(4H)-one, 5,6- 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
23296 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2016 / Notices 

dihydro-2- methyl (MTI). Comments 

were received for d-limonene however 

the public comments received were not 

substantive and did not affect the 

Agency’s interim decision. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the 

registration review case docket for the 

pesticides listed in the Table in Unit II 

will remain open until all actions 

required in the interim decisions have 

been completed. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: https://

www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/

registration-review-process. Links to 

earlier documents related to the 

registration review of these pesticides 

are provided in the pesticide chemical 

search data base accessible at https://

iaspub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/

f?p=chemicalsearch:1. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: April 13, 2016. 

Yu-Ting Guilaran, 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09155 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[OMB 3060–1177] 

Information Collection Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC or Commission) 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collections. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted on or before May 20, 2016. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contacts below as soon as 

possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via email 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov; and 

to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

Include in the comments the OMB 

control number as shown in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go 

to the Web page http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the 

section of the Web page called 

‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on 

the downward-pointing arrow in the 

‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the OMB 

control number of this ICR and then 

click on the ICR Reference Number. A 

copy of the FCC submission to OMB 

will be displayed. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–1177. 

Title: 47 CFR 74.800, Channel Sharing 

Agreement. 

Form Numbers: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other for 

profit entities; Not for profit institutions; 

State, local or Tribal government. 

Number of Respondents/Responses: 

100 respondents; 100 responses. 

Estimated Hours per Response: 1 hr. 

Frequency of Response: One time 

reporting requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 100 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $54,000. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain benefits. The statutory authority 

for this information collection is 

contained in sections 1, 4(i) and (j), 7, 

154(i), 301, 302, 303, 307, 308, 309, 312, 

316, 318, 319, 324, 325, 336 and 337 of 

the Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Privacy Act Assessment: No impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: On December 18, 

2015, the Commission released a Third 

Report and Order and Fourth Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, In the Matter of 

Amendment of Parts 73 and 74 of the 

Commission’s Rules to Establish Rules 

for Digital Low Power Television and 

Television Translator Stations, MB 

Docket No. 03–185, FCC 15–175. Low 

power television and television 

translator stations (collectively ‘‘LPTV 

stations’’) will be required to include 

certain terms in their channel sharing 

agreements (CSAs) and to file their 

CSAs with the Commission. This new 

requirement is provided in 47 CFR 

74.800. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09060 Filed 4–19–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Notice of Agreements Filed 

The Commission hereby gives notice 

of the filing of the following agreements 

under the Shipping Act of 1984. 

Interested parties may submit comments 

on the agreements to the Secretary, 

Federal Maritime Commission, 

Washington, DC 20573, within twelve 

days of the date this notice appears in 

the Federal Register. Copies of the 

agreements are available through the 

Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov) 

or by contacting the Office of 

Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or 

tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. 

Agreement No.: 011275–038. 

Title: Australia and New Zealand– 

United States Discussion Agreement. 

Parties: CMA CGM, S.A. and ANL 

Singapore Pte Ltd. (acting as a single 

party); Hamburg-Su ̈d KG; Hapag–Lloyd 

AG; and MSC Mediterranean Shipping 

Company S.A. 

Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; 

Cozen O’Connor LLP; 1200 Nineteenth 

St. NW.; Washington, DC 20036. 

Synopsis: The Amendment would 

revise the notice required to resign from 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES