alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                               CFO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 1, 2005

By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     -----------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 203.473 Claim procedure. ( a ) A claim for insurance benefits on a loan secured by a first mortgage shall be made, and insurance benefits shall be paid, as provided in §§ 203.350 through 203.414.
( b ) A claim for insurance benefits on a loan secured by other than a first mortgage shall be made, and insurance benefits shall be paid, as provided in §§ 203.474 through 203.478. However, the lender may not, except with the approval of the Commissioner, proceed against the security and also make claim under the contract of insurance, but shall elect which method it desires to pursue.
[49 FR 21319, May 21, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 35019, July 3, 1996]
Case 3:08-cv-01832-CRB   Document 11   Filed 04/07/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:08-cv-01832-CRB   Document 11   Filed 04/07/10   Page 2 of 2
**UNITED STATES**  **ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY REGION**  **IX 75**  **Hawthorne Street**  **San Francisco,**  **CA 94105**  **September 30,**  **2016 Dustin**  **Fife, San**  **Juan County**  **Library Director**  **Blanding Library,**  **San Juan**  **County 25**  **West 300**  **South Blanding,**  **UT 84511**  **Subject: Request**  **to retain**  **public documents**  **at the** **Blanding Library**  **for public**  **inspection Dear**  **Mr. Fife:**  **The purpose**  **of this**  **letter is**  **to request**  **that the**  **Blanding Library**  **retain the**  **enclosed package**  **at the**  **library for**  **at least**  **sixty (60)**  **days for** **public inspection.**  **The package**  **consists of** **documents related**  **to the**  **United States**  **Environmental Protection**  **Agency's final**  **decision on**  **the Clean**  **Air Act**  **Prevention of** **Significant Deterioration**  **amendment permit**  **for the**  **McElmo Creek**  **Unit Oil**  **Production Facility on**  **the Navajo**  **Nation Indian**  **Reservation near** **the city**  **of Aneth,**  **San Juan**  **County, Utah. We**  **would greatly**  **appreciate your**  **assistance for**  **making these**  **documents available**  **to the**  **general public.**  **Please contact**  **me at**  **(415) 947-4156**  **or r9airpermits@epa.gov**  **if you** **have any**  **questions.**

**Enclosure �** 

**Shaheerah Kelly**  **Environmental Engineer**  **Permits Office,**  **Air Division**
§ 220.805 Termination of insurance. ( a ) *Prepayment in full.* The contract of insurance shall be terminated if the loan is paid in full prior to its maturity. Notice of the prepayment shall be given to the Commissioner, on a form prescribed by the Commissioner, within 30 days from the date of the prepayment. The insurance termination shall become effective as of the date of the prepayment.
( b ) *Voluntary termination.* The contract of insurance shall be voluntarily terminated upon receipt by the Commissioner of a written request, on a form prescribed by the Commissioner, by the borrower and the lender for such termination, accompanied by a submission of the original credit instrument for cancellation of the insurance endorsement and the remittance of all sums to which the Commissioner is entitled. The termination shall become effective as of the date these requirements are met.
# Diario Oficial L 16I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0685 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | L 016I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Legislación | 62.° año18 de enero de 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0685

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

L 016I

Edición en lengua española

Legislación

62.° año18 de enero de 2019

---

| Sumario | | Corrección de errores | Página |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrección de errores del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2019/73 de la Comisión, de 17 de enero de 2019, por el que se establece un derecho antidumping definitivo y se percibe definitivamente el derecho provisional establecido sobre las importaciones de bicicletas eléctricas originarias de la República Popular China ( DO L 16 de 18.1.2019 ) | 1 |

Sumario

Corrección de errores

Página

*

Corrección de errores del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2019/73 de la Comisión, de 17 de enero de 2019, por el que se establece un derecho antidumping definitivo y se percibe definitivamente el derecho provisional establecido sobre las importaciones de bicicletas eléctricas originarias de la República Popular China ( DO L 16 de 18.1.2019 )

( DO L 16 de 18.1.2019 )

1

| ES | Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres finos son actos de gestión corriente, adoptados en el marco de la política agraria, y que tienen generalmente un período de validez limitado.
  Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres gruesos y precedidos de un asterisco son todos los demás actos. |
| --- | --- |

ES

Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres finos son actos de gestión corriente, adoptados en el marco de la política agraria, y que tienen generalmente un período de validez limitado.

Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres gruesos y precedidos de un asterisco son todos los demás actos.

---

Corrección de errores

| 18.1.2019 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | LI 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2019

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

LI 16/1

---

Corrección de errores del Reglamento de Ejecución (UE) 2019/73 de la Comisión, de 17 de enero de 2019, por el que se establece un derecho antidumping definitivo y se percibe definitivamente el derecho provisional establecido sobre las importaciones de bicicletas eléctricas originarias de la República Popular China

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 16 de 18 de enero de 2019
  )

En la página 135, en el artículo 4:

antes de:

«El presente Reglamento será obligatorio en todos sus elementos y directamente aplicable en cada Estado miembro.»,

añadir el siguiente texto:

«El presente Reglamento entrará en vigor el día siguiente de su publicación el Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea.».

---
### §4393. Report to Congress by President

The President shall, within nine months of October 30, 1970, transmit to the Congress a report of the study and surveys required by section 4392 of this title, including (1) his conclusions regarding the nature and gravity of the hazards to human health and safety created by environmental pollution, (2) his evaluation of the medical and other assistance available to persons affected by such pollution, especially when such pollution reaches emergency levels, (3) his assessment of the measures, other than those relating solely to abatement of the pollution, that may be taken to avoid or reduce the effects of such pollution on the health of individuals, and (4) such legislative or other recommendations as he may deem appropriate.

(Pub. L. 91–515, title V, §501(c), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1310.)
#### § 241.1105 Late charges.

The note and security instrument may provide for the lender's collection of a late charge, not to exceed 2 cents for each dollar of each payment to interest or principal more than 15 days in arrears, to cover the expense involved in handling delinquent payments. Late charges shall be separately charged to and collected from the borrower and shall not be deducted from any aggregate monthly payment.
### §6914b. Degradable plastic ring carriers; definitions

As used in this title—

(1) the term "regulated item" means any plastic ring carrier device that contains at least one hole greater than 13⁄4 inches in diameter which is made, used, or designed for the purpose of packaging, transporting, or carrying multipackaged cans or bottles, and which is of a size, shape, design, or type capable, when discarded, of becoming entangled with fish or wildlife; and

(2) the term "naturally degradable material" means a material which, when discarded, will be reduced to environmentally benign subunits under the action of normal environmental forces, such as, among others, biological decomposition, photodegradation, or hydrolysis.

(Pub. L. 100–556, title I, §102, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 100–556, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2779, which enacted sections 6914b and 6914b–1 of this title, and provisions set out as a note under section 6914b of this title. For complete classification of this title to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Solid Waste Disposal Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Congressional Findings

Pub. L. 100–556, title I, §101, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2779, provided that: "The Congress finds that—

"(1) plastic ring carrier devices have been found in large quantities in the marine environment;

"(2) fish and wildlife have been known to have become entangled in plastic ring carriers;

"(3) nondegradable plastic ring carrier devices can remain intact in the marine environment for decades, posing a threat to fish and wildlife; and

"(4) 16 States have enacted laws requiring that plastic ring carrier devices be made from degradable material in order to reduce litter and to protect fish and wildlife."
#### In the Matter of George Bradley, Appellant, v Nassau County Civil Service Commission et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review a determination of respondent Leonard, Executive Directrix of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission, which denied petitioner’s request to "upgrade” certain positions in the Nassau County Department of Probation, petitioner appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 5, 1976, which, *inter alia,*dismissed the proceeding and (2) an order of the same court, dated May 26, 1976, which denied his motion for leave to reargue. Appeal from the order dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue. Judgment affirmed. Respondents are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover both appeals. Petitioner, a field investigator employed by the Nassau County Department of Probation, commenced a grievance on June 8, 1974, pursuant to CSEA contract, alleging that the salary of field investigators was not commensurate with the responsibilities, experience and skills required for the positions. The grievance was ultimately denied in July, 1975 on the ground that "mass upgradings in the Probation Department is not a jurisdictionally proper subject * * * in a grievance procedure. The subject matter is appropriate for Civil Service Commission review and determination.” Petitioner does not challenge the denial of the grievance, but instead asserts that certain correspondence between Mr. Milone, Director of the Department of Probation, and Ms. Leonard constitutes an administrative determination which is arbitrary and capricious and he requests that the classification of probation investigators be upgraded. Rule XXIX of the Rules of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission provides procedures for the reclassification of civil service positions. Petitioner has made no application for reclassification pursuant to that rule and the correspondence between Mr. Milone and Ms. Leonard, consisting of interdepartmental memos, does not constitute such an application. Since no proper application has been made, it cannot be concluded that there is a final determination by respondents which can be reviewed. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

SHAWN HALBERT

Assistant Federal Public Defender

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant DAVID A. MALDONADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID A. MALDONADO

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No. 09-0619 EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS DATE AND

EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161 

STIPULATION

The parties are scheduled to appear before this Court on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 2:00

p.m. for a status appearance. Due to a change in circumstances, undersigned defense counsel

will be unavailable for that appearance and thus requests that the matter be continued by one

week to Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Government counsel has no objection to this

request. The parties stipulate that time between May 12, 2010 and May 19, 2010 should be

excluded from the Speedy Trial Act calculation because the ends of justice outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial in light of the need. for continuity of 

/ / /

/ / /

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR No. 09-0619 MAG (EMC)

1

Case 3:09-cr-00619-EMC Document 32 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (h)(B)(iv). 

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

DATED: May 11, 2010 ____/s/______________________

ACADIA SENESE

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: May 11, 2010 ___/s/_________________________

SHAWN HALBERT

Attorney for David Maldonado

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the next court appearance in this matter is continued from

Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. to Wednesday, May 19, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. IT IS

FURTHER ORDERED that the time between May 12, 2010 and May 19, 2010 is excluded from

the Speedy Trial Act calculation because the ends of justice outweigh the best interests of the

public and the defendant in a speedy trial in light of the need. for continuity of 

counsel. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ ________________________________________

HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge 

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

CR No. 09-0619 MAG (EMC)

2

Case 3:09-cr-00619-EMC Document 32 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. CORRECTED

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40095 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTIN DENNIS ARRASMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-76-CR-152-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 6, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Martin D. Arrasmith, federal prisoner #60757-080, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) from the denial of his motion seeking coram nobis relief from his 1976 federal drug conviction. Arrasmith contends solely that the federal courts lack jurisdiction over drug offenses that occur within the states. Arrasmith’s contention is frivolous; his motion forNo. -2- leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). APPEAL DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Exhibit 32.2

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

     In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission of Emergent Group Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify that (i) in our capacities as officers of the Company,
(ii) to each of our own respective actual knowledge, and (iii) solely for the
purpose of compliance with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

          (1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a)
                    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                    and

          (2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company.

     The above certification is given as of the date of the Report and is
limited to the periods covered by the Report. The above certification is made
severally and not jointly.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on
November 12, 2004.


                                            By: /s/ William M. McKay
                                                --------------------
                                                    William M. McKay
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.7





Exhibit 10.7




NuPathe Inc.




Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy




This policy sets forth the compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors of
NuPathe Inc. after its initial public offering (“IPO”). The Board of Directors may change this
policy at any time.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Paid or
	Compensation Element	 	Amount	 	Granted1
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Board of Directors:
	 	 	 	 
	• Director Retainer

	 	$35,000 per year
	 	Quarterly2
	• Chairman Retainer

	 	$35,000 per year (additional)
	 	Quarterly2
	• Annual Option Grant

	 	3,743 options3
	 	Annually4
	• New Director Option Grant

	 	7,486 options3
	 	At sign-on5
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee:
	 	 	 	 
	• Chair Retainer

	 	$15,000 per year
	 	Quarterly2
	• Member Retainer

	 	$7,500 per year
	 	Quarterly2
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee:
	 	 	 	 
	• Chair Retainer

	 	$10,000 per year
	 	Quarterly2
	• Member Retainer

	 	$5,000 per year
	 	Quarterly
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee:
	 	 	 	 
	• Chair Retainer

	 	$5,000 per year
	 	Quarterly2
	• Member Retainer

	 	$3,500 per year
	 	Quarterly2
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Expenses:
	 	 	 	 
	• Reimbursed

	 	Per NuPathe Travel Policy
	 	As submitted








 




	 	 	 
	1	 	All options granted to non-employee directors shall have an exercise price equal to
the closing price per share on the date of grant and a term of 10 years. Upon a termination
of service, unvested options expire and vested options remain exercisable for one year.
	 
	2	 	Quarterly cash payments will be disbursed at the beginning of each calendar quarter for
service rendered during the prior quarter. Prior to the beginning of each calendar year, directors may submit
an election to receive stock options in lieu of quarterly cash payments during the year, in an
amount based on the Black-Scholes valuation. Options in lieu of cash compensation are fully
vested on the date of grant.
	 
	3	 	Option amounts are subject to adjustment by the Board of Directors from time to time.
	 
	4	 	Annual Option Grants are made on the date of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to all
non-employee directors in office after the Annual Meeting. Annual Option Grants vest in full
on the earlier of the day before the following year’s Annual Meeting, and the one year
anniversary of the grant date, but vest in full earlier upon a change of control of NuPathe or
the death or total disability of the director.
	 
	5	 	New Director Option Grants are made on the date that a new non-employee director joins
the Board, except that non-employee directors in office at the IPO will receive their New
Director Option Grants on the date the Registration Statement for the IPO is declared
effective, at an exercise price equal to the IPO price to the public. New Director Option
Grants vest one-third per year beginning on the one year anniversary of the grant date, but
vest in full earlier upon a change of control of NuPathe or the death or total disability of
the director.