alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 9/20/2012 Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Sample Number: 123763-001 Date Collected:09/05/2012 08:20 Date Received:9/5/2012 

### Plant Outfall #001
Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ug/L Arsenic, As 4.54 0.1 DPC EPA 200.8 0.03 09/10/2012 12:06 ug/L Barium, Ba 101 0.1 DPC EPA 200.8 0.03 09/10/2012 12:06 ug/L Hexavalent Chromium, Cr+6 < 0.1 0.5 TDF EPA 218.6 0.1 09/11/2012 U ug/L Copper, Cu 4.04 0.05 DPC EPA 200.8 0.02 09/10/2012 12:06 ug/L Nickel, Ni 6.89 0.2 DPC EPA 200.8 0.04 09/10/2012 12:06 ug/L Selenium, Se 6.3 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 09/10/2012 12:06 mg/L Aluminum, Al 0.225 0.001 DPC EPA 200.8 0.0003 09/10/2012 12:06 mg/L Iron, Fe 0.943 0.01 DAM EPA 200.7 0.002 09/07/2012 11:50 mg/L Ammonia, NH3, as N 0.17 0.05 DMM EPA 350.1 0.01 09/07/2012 mg/L Chloride, Cl 270 2 KLG EPA 300.1 0.5 09/11/2012 16:59 mg/L Sulfate, SO4 1030 10 KLG EPA 300.1 3 09/11/2012 16:59 

### Sample Number: 123763-002 Date Collected:09/05/2012 09:00 Date Received:9/5/2012 

### Plant Outfall #001
Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 2.8 2 TLT EPA 1631E 0.8 09/10/2012 

### Sample Number: 123763-003 Date Collected:09/05/2012 09:00 Date Received:9/5/2012 

## Trip Blank
Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 0.3 0.5 TLT EPA 1631E 0.2 09/10/2012 J 

### Sample Number: 123763-004 Date Collected:09/05/2012 09:00 Date Received:9/5/2012 

## Field Blank
Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 0.3 0.5 TLT EPA 1631E 0.2 09/10/2012 J 

### Sample Number: 123763-005 Date Collected:09/05/2012 08:10 Date Received:9/5/2012 

## CPS Effluent
Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 343 10 TLT EPA 1631E 4 09/10/2012 Mountaineer Plant, 123763 Page 1 of 2

### Sample Number: 123763-006 Date Collected:09/05/2012 08:15 Date Received:9/5/2012



### Bioreactor Effluent
Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/TimeMethod MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 4 5 TLT EPA 1631E 2 09/10/2012 J

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.
Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 123763 Page 2 of 2
### §9206. Wind resource assessment

The Secretary shall initiate a three-year national wind resource assessment program. As part of such program, the Secretary shall—

(1) conduct activities to validate existing assessments of known wind resources;

(2) perform wind resource assessments in regions of the United States where the use of wind energy may prove feasible;

(3) initiate a general site prospecting program;

(4) establish standard wind data collection and siting techniques; and

(5) establish, in consultation with the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, a national wind data center which shall make public information available on the known wind energy resources of various regions throughout the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–345, §7, Sept. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1143.)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PATRICIA ESQUIVEL,

Appellant,

v.

ENRIQUE GARCIA D/B/A

GARCIA & REBE LAW FIRM PLLC,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00154

- CV

Appeal from

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2015

- DCV1631 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for further

proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant recover

from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue, and this decision be cert ified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 6 TH DAY OF JU LY

, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Hughes, J., not participating
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2819 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2819

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber basketballs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2005

  Mr. Neal of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rubber basketballs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN RUBBER BASKETBALLS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.95.09       Rubber             Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         basketballs                                                        31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9506.62.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 92.18 Oaths and affirmations defined. ( a ) *Oath.* An oath is an outward pledge given by the person taking it that his attestation or promise is made under an immediate sense of his responsibility to God. In a broad sense the word “oath” includes all forms of attestation by which a person signifies that he is bound in conscience to perform an act faithfully and truly, and in this sense it includes “affirmation”.
( b ) *Affirmation.* An affirmation is a solemn and formal declaration or asseveration in the nature of an oath that a statement, or series of statements, is true. When an oath is required or authorized by law, an affirmation in lieu thereof may be taken by any person having conscientious scruples against taking an oath. As a general rule, an affirmation has the same legal force and effect as an oath.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT JAY VEDERMAN, Petitioner

v. KEIRA GRASSI VEDERMAN, Respondent : : : : : : : : : : : No. 519 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 5th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
**Exhibit 12.(a)(2)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Alan Castellanos Carmona, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thecompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:

a. designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated theeffectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in thisreport any change in the company’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b. any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|                            |   | /s/ Alan Castellanos Carmona  |
|----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Name:                              | Alan Castellanos Carmona |
|                       |   | Title:                             | Chief Financial Officer |
|                       |   |                               |   |
|                       |   |                               |   |
| Date: June 28,  2007  |   |                               |   |

 

1

----
### §§71 to 71l. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 71, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §1, 46 Stat. 150, which provided for a detail for duty with executive and independent departments carrying on public health activities, was transferred to section 17a of this title.

Section 71a, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §2(a), 46 Stat. 150, which provided for a detail for duty with educational and research institutions, was transferred to section 17b of this title.

Section 71b, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §2(a), 46 Stat. 150, which provided for extension of facilities of Service to health officials and scientist, was transferred to section 8a of this title.

Section 71c, acts Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §2(b), 46 Stat. 150; May 26, 1930, ch. 320, §1, 46 Stat. 379, which provided for additional divisions in Institute as authorized by Federal Security Administrator, was transferred to section 23g of this title.

Section 71d, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §3, 46 Stat. 150, which provided that administrative office and bureau divisions in District of Columbia be a part of departmental organization and scientific offices and research laboratories be a part of the field service, was transferred to section 9a of this title.

Section 71e, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §4, 46 Stat. 150, which provided for appointment and grades of medical, dental, sanitary, engineer, and pharmacist officers, was transferred to section 38 of this title.

Section 71f, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §5, 46 Stat. 150, which provided for number, pay and allowances, and service credits for pay purposes of medical, dental, sanitary, engineer, and pharmacist officers, was transferred to section 39 of this title.

Section 71g, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §6, 46 Stat. 151, which provided for assignment of Reserve officers to active duty and for such service counting for promotion credits, was transferred to section 18a of this title.

Section 71h, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §7, 46 Stat. 151, which provided for appointment of persons other than commissioned officers for scientific research, was transferred to section 41 of this title.

Section 71i, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §8, 46 Stat. 151, which provided for disability pay for commissioned officers, was transferred to section 66 of this title.

Section 71j, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §9, 46 Stat. 151, which provided for promotions and pay and allowances of commissioned officers, was transferred to section 37 of this title.

Section 71k, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §10(a), 46 Stat. 152, which provided titles for officers other than medical officers of Service, was transferred to section 35 of this title.

Section 71l, act Apr. 9, 1930, ch. 125, §10(a), 46 Stat. 152, which provided titles for officers in grade of Assistant Surgeon General, was transferred to section 36 of this title.
(February 23, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sanford Engelhardt, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on October 1, 1976, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Silverman, Evans and Sullivan, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2





TOT
Energy, Inc.


12100 NE
16 Ave; Suite 210


North
Miami, FL 33161





June 29,
2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of TOT
Energy, Inc., for the year ended March 31, 2009, each of the undersigned hereby
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), to the
undersigned’s knowledge that:




1.
              such amended Annual Report on
      Form 10-K of TOT Energy, Inc., for the year ended March 31, 2009, fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934;
and


2.
              the information contained in such
      amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of TOT Energy, Inc., for the year ended
      March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of TOT Energy,
    Inc.




BY:
      /S/ Mike ZoiMike
      ZoiChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)BY:
      /S/ Jonathan NewJonathan
      NewChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to TOT Energy, Inc. and will be
retained by TOT Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is
being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to TOT Energy, Inc.’s amended annual
report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
List of Files in “moves_ff_nh_pm_runoutputs_to_mysql.zip”

Name Size Type Last Modified

Folder data

Sub Folder 09000_ffnh_pmconfbudget_20120207_out

activitytype.frm 8,680 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

activitytype.MYD 511 MYD File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

activitytype.MYI 2,048 MYI File 2/7/2012 4:43 PM

bundletracking.frm 9,514 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

bundletracking.MYD 374KB MYD File 2/8/2012 2:57 PM

bundletracking.MYI 37KB MYI File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

db.opt 65 OPT File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movesactivityoutput.frm 9,278 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movesactivityoutput.MYD 626KB MYD File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

movesactivityoutput.MYI 1,024 MYI File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

moveserror.frm 9,026 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

moveserror.MYD 72 MYD File 2/7/2012 9:03 PM

moveserror.MYI 4,096 MYI File 2/7/2012 9:11 PM

moveseventlog.frm 8,786 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

moveseventlog.MYD 0 MYD File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

moveseventlog.MYI 1,024 MYI File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movesoutput.frm 9,390 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movesoutput.MYD 11MB MYD File 2/8/2012 2:58 PM

movesoutput.MYI 1,024 MYI File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

movesrun.frm 9,572 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movesrun.MYD 3,960 MYD File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

movesrun.MYI 2,048 MYI File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

movestablesused.frm 8,878 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movestablesused.MYD 66KB MYD File 2/8/2012 1:54 PM

movestablesused.MYI 44KB MYI File 2/8/2012 1:54 PM

movesworkersused.frm 8,812 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

movesworkersused.MYD 540 MYD File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

movesworkersused.MYI 2,048 MYI File 2/8/2012 3:13 PM

rateperdistance.frm 9,268 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

rateperdistance.MYD 0 MYD File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

rateperdistance.MYI 1,024 MYI File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

rateperprofile.frm 9,124 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

rateperprofile.MYD 0 MYD File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

rateperprofile.MYI 1,024 MYI File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

ratepervehicle.frm 9,132 WordPerfect 12 Document 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

ratepervehicle.MYD 0 MYD File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM

ratepervehicle.MYI 1,024 MYI File 2/7/2012 4:41 PM
#### § 171.30 Purpose and scope.

This subpart sets forth the process by which persons may request access to public financial disclosure reports filed with the Department in accordance with sections 101 and 103(l) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended, recodified at 5 U.S.C. 13103 and 13105. The retention, public availability, and improper use of these reports are governed by 5 U.S.C. 13107 and 5 CFR 2634.603. It also sets forth the prohibition on access to confidential financial disclosure reports filed under 5 CFR 2634, Subpart I, in accordance with sections 107(a) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 13109 and 5 CFR 2634.604.
§ 227.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP CHANGE HR’G DATE

CASE NO. CR 09-346-3 VRW

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

TAREK J. HELOU (CABN 218225)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: Tarek.J.Helou@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CARLA JO BRUMLEY,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-346-3 VRW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CHANGING DATE FOR

SENTENCING

Current Date: March 4, 2010

Current Time: 2:00 p.m

Proposed Date: March 11, 2010

Proposed Time: 2:00 p.m.

Case 3:09-cr-00346-VRW Document 231 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP CHANGE HR’G DATE

CASE NO. CR 09-346-3 VRW -1-

Defendant Carla Jo Brumley is currently set to be sentenced by the Court on March 4,

2010. The attorney representing the government in this case, Assistant U.S. Attorney Tarek J.

Helou, will be out of town on work-related business on the date of the hearing. 

Counsel for the government requests that the Court change the date of the sentencing

hearing in this matter to March 11, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. Based on government counsel’s stated

unavailability, the defense does not object to the request. Counsel for the government discussed

this change with Christina Carrubba, the U.S. Probation Officer assigned to this case; she does

not object to the change

It is so stipulated. 

DATED: February 24, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

/S/

________________________________

TAREK J. HELOU

Assistant United States Attorney

/S/

________________________________

MICHAEL STEPANIAN

Counsel for Defendant Carla Jo Brumley

For good cause appearing, and based on the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the sentencing hearing for defendant Carla Jo Brumley, currently scheduled for

March 4, 2010 at 2:00 p.m., will be continued to March 11, 2010 at 2:00 p.m.

DATED:

________________________________________

THE HONORABLE VAUGHN R. WALKER

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/26/2010 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cr-00346-VRW Document 231 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 2
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00069-CR

______________________________

JAMES DIXON GRAVES, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 76th Judicial District Court

Morris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10,004

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Dixon Graves, Jr., appeals from his convictions by a jury in this cause on two 

charges of aggravated sexual assault of a disabled person.1 Graves has filed a single brief in 

which he raises issues common to all of his appeals. He argues that the trial court erred in 

denying the following: (1) his motion to suppress the evidence; (2) his request for funds to hire an 

expert; (3) his request to have the victim examined by the expert as to her disability and 

competency to testify; and (4) his motion for mistrial. Graves also complains that the evidence 

was insufficient to establish the victim was disabled under the Texas Penal Code. 

We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date on Graves’ appeal in cause 

number 06-09-00063-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error has not 

been shown in this case.

We affirm the judgment.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: February 5, 2010

Date Decided: February 24, 2010

Do Not Publish

 

1Graves appeals from judgments entered in cause numbers 06-09-00063-CR through 06-09-00070-CR.