alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             799
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,454
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,504
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,311
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,327
<LOANS>                                         47,179
<ALLOWANCE>                                        802
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,447
<DEPOSITS>                                      57,764
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,200
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  72,447
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,959
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  481
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   223
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,663
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,220
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,443
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    607
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         607
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       370
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.15
<LOANS-NON>                                         82
<LOANS-PAST>                                        22
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    89
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   806
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        6
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  802
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               104
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            698
        

</TABLE>
### §7919. Rules

The Secretary may prescribe such rules consistent with the purposes of this chapter as he deems appropriate pursuant to title V of the Department of Energy Organization Act [42 U.S.C. 7191 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 95–604, title I, §109, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3030.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–604, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3021, known as the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note under section 7901 of this title and Tables.

The Department of Energy Organization Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565. Title V of the Department of Energy Organization Act is classified generally to subchapter V (§7191 et seq.) of chapter 84 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7101 of this title and Tables.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-15T12:02:29Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-15T12:02:29Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-15T12:02:29Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="12732">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-15T12:02:29Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OPINION # O-7530 WAS NEVER ISSUED OK 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
### **CHAPTER 4—DISTRICT LAND OFFICES**

Sec.
70 to 74.
Repealed or Omitted.
75.
Administration of oaths.
75a to 79b. Repealed.
79c.
Payment of fees, commissions, etc.; deposit in Treasury.
79d.
Alaska land claimant liable for fees, commissions or purchase money; deposit in Treasury.
80 to 82.
Repealed.
83.
Transcripts of records as evidence.
84, 85.
Repealed or Omitted.
86.
Accounting for fees for notices of cancellation of entries.
87, 88.
Repealed.
89.
Monthly returns of district land offices.
90.
Omitted.
91.
Deposit in Treasury of unearned fees and unofficial moneys.
92.
Lists furnished with deposits.
93.
Deposit of moneys deposited by unknown parties.
94.
Reimbursement of sums disbursed as special disbursing agents.
95 to 98a.
Repealed.
99.
Repayment of moneys deposited and covered into Treasury.
100.
Disqualification.
101.
Report of disqualification; designation of officer to act.
102.
Attendance of witnesses.
103.
Witnesses' fees.
104.
Disobedience to subpoena.
105.
Depositions of witnesses residing outside county.
106.
Continuing taking of depositions in behalf of opposite party.
107.
Penalty for false information.
Order entered July 1 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00025 - CV IN TH E INTEREST OF B.N.L - B., A CHILD On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 07 - 17647



### O RDER Before the Court are appellee D.B.’s and appellee M.A.’s June 29, 2016 unopposed motions to extend time to file their briefs. The motions are GRANTED . D.B.’s and M.A.’s briefs shall be filed by July 28, 2016.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
### SUBCHAPTER II—INVESTIGATIONS AND PLANNING
### §6736. Authorization of appropriations for Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and Virgin Islands

#### (a) Authorizations for five calendar quarters beginning July 1, 1977

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each of the five succeeding calendar quarters (beginning with the calendar quarter which begins on July 1, 1977) for the purpose of making payments under this subchapter to Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands, an amount equal to 1 percent of the amount authorized for each such quarter under section 6722(b) of this title.

#### (b) Allocations

(1) The Secretary shall allocate from the amount authorized under subsection (a) an amount for the purpose of making payments to such governments equal to the total authorized for the calendar quarter multiplied by the applicable territorial percentage.

(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the applicable territorial percentage is equal to the quotient resulting from the division of the territorial population by the sum of the territorial population for all territories.

(3) For purposes of this section—

(A) The term "territory" means Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands.

(B) The term "territorial population" means the most recent population for each territory as determined by the Bureau of Census.

(C) The provisions of sections 6723(c)(4), 6724, 6725, 6726,1 6727, 6728, 6729, 6730, 6731, 6732, and 6733 1 of this title shall apply to the funds authorized under this section.

#### (c) Payments to local governments

The governments of the territories are authorized to make payments to local governments within their jurisdiction from sums received under this section as they deem appropriate.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title II, §216, as added Pub. L. 95–30, title VI, §607, May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 167.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 6726 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(3)(C), was repealed by Pub. L. 95–30, title VI, §603(i), May 23, 1977, 91 Stat. 166.

Section 6733 of this title, referred to in subsec. (b)(3)(C), was repealed by Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1131(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 725.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §70. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 655

Section, act June 30, 1949, ch. 286, title I, 63 Stat. 365, provided for a per diem allowance of officers detailed to the Coast Guard.

Acts June 26, 1943, ch. 147, title I, 57 Stat. 210; Mar. 31, 1943, ch. 30, §1, 57 Stat. 55; June 22, 1944, ch. 269, title I, 58 Stat. 315; May 29, 1945, ch. 130, 59 Stat. 216; July 12, 1946, ch. 569, §1, 60 Stat. 530; July 1, 1947, ch. 186, title I, 61 Stat. 225; June 19, 1948, ch. 558, title I, 62 Stat. 562, which contained provisions similar to section 70 of this title, were repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 651–654.
### §5909. Relationship to antitrust laws

(a) Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to convey to any individual, corporation, or other business organization immunity from civil or criminal liability, or to create defenses to actions, under the antitrust laws.

(b) As used in this section, the term "antitrust law" means—

(1) the Act entitled "An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies", approved July 2, 1890 (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), as amended;

(2) the Act entitled "An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes", approved October 15, 1914 (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) as amended;

(3) the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.), as amended;

(4) sections 73 and 74 of the Act entitled "An Act to reduce taxation, to provide revenue for the Government, and for other purposes", approved August 27, 1894 (15 U.S.C. 8 and 9), as amended; and

(5) the Act of June 19, 1936, chapter 592 (15 U.S.C. 13, 13a, 13b, and 21a).

(Pub. L. 93–577, §10, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1891.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of July 2, 1890, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is act July 2, 1890, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209, known as the Sherman Act, which is classified to sections 1 to 7 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1 of Title 15 and Tables.

Act of October 15, 1914, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, known as the Clayton Act, which is classified generally to sections 12, 13, 14 to 19, 21, and 22 to 27 of Title 15, and sections 52 and 53 of Title 29, Labor. For further details and complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 12 of Title 15 and Tables.

The Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.), as amended, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of Title 15. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of Title 15 and Tables.

Act of June 19, 1936, chapter 592, referred to in subsec. (b)(5), is act June 19, 1936, ch. 592, 49 Stat. 1526, popularly known as the Robinson-Patman Antidiscrimination Act and also as the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, which enacted sections 13a, 13b, and 21a of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and amended section 13 of Title 15. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 13 of Title 15 and Tables.
#### Durham *v.*The State.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Upon the trial of one indicted for murder, there was no error in refusing to allow counsel for the defendant, on cross-examination, to ask a witness for the State, “You tried to lie about that once when they tried Elmo Morgan and sent him up?” This was not a proper, form of question, nor did it indicate an answer which would have been admissible; nor was this aided by the Statement on the part of counsel for the defendant that at a" former trial of a different defendant, which involved the same issue, the witness had “undertaken to testify differently.” If the witness testified differently as to a material matter, this might be provable for the purpose of impeachment; but whether he “tried to lie,” or had undertaken to testify differently, was irrelevant.

2. The charge of which complaint was made in the second ground of the amended motion for a new trial was that which was approved in *Mann*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*760 (53 S. E. 324, 4 L. R. A. (N. S.) 434), and in later decisions.

*[a)*The ruling in the preceding headnote likewise covers the charge of which complaint was made in the third ground of the motion for a new trial.

3. Where upon the trial of one charged with murder neither of his counsel in argument to the jury contended that he should be found not guilty, and one of them, who was the leading counsel, distinctly stated to the jury that he conceded, under the law and facts, that the defendant was guilty of voluntary manslaughter, and that he ought to be found guilty of that offense, and not of the offense of murder; and where, before beginning his charge, the court called the leading counsel for the defendant to the judge’s stand and asked him if he wanted any instructions given except in regard to murder and manslaughter, and received a negative answer, it furnished no ground for a new trial that the judge did not in his charge give to the jury a form of verdict *818of not guilty, or state that the jury could so find. *Steed*v. *State,*123 *Ga.*569 (51 S. E. 627).

November 13, 1912.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge J. B. Park. Greene superior court. August *22,*1912.

*Lewis, Davison & Lewis,*for plaintiff in' error.

*T. 8. Felder, attorney-general,*and *J, E, Pottle, solicitor-general,*contra.

4. When considered in connection with the entire charge, none of the' excerpts of which complaint is made furnished ground for a reversal.

(a) Inaccuracies in a charge, which are more favorable to a defendant than a correct statement of the law would be, furnish no ground for a new trial on his behalf.

5. The verdict was supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §7151a. Jurisdiction over matters transferred from Energy Research and Development Administration

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, jurisdiction over matters transferred to the Department of Energy from the Energy Research and Development Administration which on the effective date of such transfer were required by law, regulation, or administrative order to be made on the record after an opportunity for an agency hearing may be assigned to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or retained by the Secretary at his discretion.

(Pub. L. 95–238, title I, §104(a), Feb. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 53.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Energy Act of 1978—Civilian Applications, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
#### Juan Alberto Lizarraga RAMOS; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71802.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 16, 2007.

Juan Alberto Lizarraga Ramos, Lake Elsinore, CA, pro se.

Bayrot Lizarraga Sandoval, Lake Elsinore, CA, pro se.

Angela Concepcion Lizarraga Sandoval, Lake Elsinore, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Alberto Lizarraga Ramos and his two children, Bayrot Lizarraga Sandoval and Angela Concepcion Lizarraga Sandoval, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings, and dismissing their appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their motion for a continuance to allow them to apply for cancellation of removal. We review the denial of a continuance for abuse of discretion. *See Baires v. INS,*856 F.2d 89, 91 (9th Cir.1988). We deny the petition for review.

Petitioners do not raise in their opening brief, and thereby waive, any challenge to the BIA’s denial of their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in determining that Petitioners failed to demonstrate that they were prejudiced by the IJ’s order denying their motion for a continuance, because the record does not provide any evidence of their claimed eligibility for cancellation of removal. *See Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 972 (9th Cir.2000) (to demonstrate prejudice, petitioner must show that the IJ’s conduct potentially affected the outcome of the proceedings).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2841 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2841

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
coverage, as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of home 
  needle destruction devices and the disposal of needles and lancets 
    through a sharps-by-mail or similar program under part D of the 
                           Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2005

Mr. Ferguson (for himself, Mr. Strickland, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Ryan of 
 Ohio, and Mr. Issa) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
    to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
coverage, as supplies associated with the injection of insulin, of home 
  needle destruction devices and the disposal of needles and lancets 
    through a sharps-by-mail or similar program under part D of the 
                           Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Safe Needle Disposal 
Coverage Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. COVERAGE OF HOME NEEDLE DESTRUCTION DEVICES AND DISPOSAL OF 
              NEEDLES AND LANCETS THROUGH A SHARPS-BY-MAIL OR SIMILAR 
              PROGRAM UNDER MEDICARE PART D.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-2(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(e)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting after 
``regulations of the Secretary'' the following: ``and including devices 
approved for home use by the Food and Drug Administration for the safe 
and effective destruction of needles and the disposal of needles and 
lancets through a sharps-by-mail or similar program as medically 
appropriate based on volume of usage''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER II—SERVICE CHARGES AND EXCESS PAYMENTS
### §1181f–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1181f–4 was editorially reclassified as section 2624 of this title.
# Search Census Archive

Home1997

## Farm and Ranch Irrigation Survey

**Census Year:** 1997

**Within:** Volume 3: Specialty Products And Special Studies

**

### 						Summary and References					

**

### 						Maps					

**

### 						United States Data					

**

### 						Appendix					

### Other Years

#### 				2012			

#### 				2007			

#### 				2002			

#### 				1997			

#### 				1992			

#### 				1987			

#### 				1982			

#### 				1978			

#### 				1974			

#### 				1969			

#### 				1964			

#### 				1959			

#### 				1954			

#### 				1950			

#### 				1945			

#### 				1940			

#### 				1935			

#### 				1930			

#### 				1925			

#### 				1920			

#### 				1910			

#### 				1900			

#### 				1890			

#### 				1880			

#### 				1870			

- Home
- Login

- Home
- Login

repliche rolex orologigenți falsereplique breitling

**Partners:**

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)

Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell UniversityUnited States Department of Agriculture

**Developed & supported by:**

**Albert R. Mann Library****Cornell University****Ithaca, NY 14853-4301**Phone: **(607) 255-5406**Email: **usda-help@cornell.edu**