alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2925 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2925

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
              extend the authority for drought assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2005

  Mr. Hinojosa (for himself, Mr. Otter, Mr. Salazar, Mr. Simpson, Mr. 
   Grijalva, Mr. Udall of Colorado, and Mr. Doggett) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 to 
              extend the authority for drought assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE RECLAMATION STATES EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF 
              ACT OF 1991.

    Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief 
Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2005'' and inserting ``September 30, 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL E. MOCKOVAK, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

RON HAYNES, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 21-35634

D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00671-JLR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 7, 2022** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: GILMAN,*** IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

 

FILED

JUN 15 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Michael Mockovak appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a

writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253.

The Washington Court of Appeals’s determination that Mockovak’s trial

counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel by (a) failing to investigate

whether Mockovak’s history of childhood abuse rendered him more susceptible to

entrapment, and (b) failing to introduce such evidence at trial (i.e., a defense of

“learned helplessness”), was not an objectively unreasonable application of

Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Even assuming that the state

habeas court’s determination that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient was

an unreasonable application of Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003), and Sears v.

Upton, 561 U.S. 945 (2010),1 the state habeas court could reasonably conclude that

any deficiency by Mockovak’s counsel was not prejudicial, given the “extensive

evidence that Mockovak initiated discussions with Kultin about hiring Russian

hitmen,” and Mockovak’s response (“That sounds good”) when Kultin told him

that everything was in place for King’s murder. See Staten v. Davis, 962 F.3d 487,

495, 497 (9th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1502 (2021).

1

 Because we make this assumption, we do not reach Mockovak’s additional

arguments regarding the deficiency prong of the Strickland analysis. 

2
We reject Mockovak’s argument that the state habeas court conflated

Strickland’s deficiency and prejudice prongs and failed to consider the totality of

the evidence in its prejudice analysis. The court separated its prejudice analysis

from its deficiency analysis, considered the learned helplessness evidence that

Mockovak claimed should have been presented, and determined that Mockovak

did not show a reasonable probability that such evidence would have changed the

outcome of his trial. 

AFFIRMED.

3
#### § 214.503 Other requirements.

In addition to the requirements of this part, the Housing Counseling program is subject to applicable federal requirements in 24 CFR 5.105.
China Shengda Packaging Group Inc.: Exhibit 10.5 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





Exhibit 10.5

China Packaging Group Inc.

Nov. 1, 2010

Dear Mr. Yaoquan Zhang:

Re.: Independent directorship

We are writing to confirm your appointment as an independent director of
China Packaging Group, Inc. (the "Company"), which is currently listed on the OTCBB under CPAK.OB.

Following your acceptance, your appointment will be effective
as of Nov. 1, 2010. You are entitled to an annual director's fee of RMB 100,000. Your annual fee will be payable monthly.

You hereby agree to maintain the confidentiality of the confidential
information and trade secrets of the Company, including but not limited to, any
confidential information and statistics, business plans, operations,
technologies, know-how, systems and/or the proposed sale, purchase and use of
services and products furnished in oral, visual, written and/or other tangible
form and not to disclose such information to any third party without the prior
consent of the Company.

Please confirm your acceptance of the appointment as an independent director
of the Company by signing, dating and returning to us the attached copy of this
letter.

Yours faithfully,



/s/ Fang Nengbin

Fang Nengbin

Chairman of the Board

I hereby confirm my acceptance to act as an independent director of the
Company upon the terms contained in this letter.



/s/ Yaoquan Zhang

Yaoquan Zhang



Date: Nov. 1, 2010
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2766 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,4 disulfo benzaldehyde. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,4 disulfo 

benzaldehyde. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,4 DISULFO BENZALDEHYDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.66 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,4 disulfo benzaldehyde) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2766 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of Dorotha Prunty, Petitioner, v Philip Toia, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the State Department of Social Services, dated December 29, 1976 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to disallow petitioner’s application for a special grant to purchase furniture and furnishings. Determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition granted, and respondents are directed to provide petitioner with the requested special grant. Petitioner and her infant son resided with her mother until December, 1976. Upon the eviction of the family, petitioner moved into an unfurnished apartment. That was the first time she established a home and was the first time she was head of the household. As such, petitioner was entitled to relief pursuant to subdivision (6) of section 131-a of the Social Services Law and 18 NYCRR 352.7 (a) (1). Martuscello, J. P., Damiani, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
                                               METRIS COMPANIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                                 Computation of Earnings Per Share



In thousands, except per-share amounts                  Three Months Ended June 30,    Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                             2000         1999            2000        1999
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>              <C>         <C>
BASIC:
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders ....   $  40,510   $(129,369)       $  82,870   $(112,254)
                                                           =========   =========        =========   =========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ...      58,838      57,856           58,400      57,822

Net income (loss) per share ............................   $    0.69   $   (2.24)       $    1.42   $   (1.94)

DILUTED:

Net income applicable to common stockholders (1) .......   $  48,280   $(129,369)       $  98,238   $(112,254)
                                                           =========   =========        =========   =========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ...      58,838      57,856           58,400      57,822
Net effect of assumed exercise of stock options based on
   treasury stock method using average market price ....       3,566          --            3,554          --
Assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock ......      29,164          --           29,164          --
                                                           ---------   ---------        ---------   ---------
                                                              91,568      57,856           91,118      57,822
                                                           =========   =========        =========   =========
Net income per share ...................................   $    0.53   $   (2.24)       $    1.08    $  (1.94)
</TABLE>


(1)  For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2000, diluted earnings
     per share is calculated by adding back the Series C convertible preferred
     dividend of $7.8 million and $15.4 million, respectively. In determining
     the number of dilutive shares outstanding, the Series C convertible
     preferred stock is assumed to have been converted into 29.2 million shares
     at the beginning of the period.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProceedings of the Flat-Plate Solar Array Project Research Forum on Photovoltaic Metallization SystemsA photovoltaic Metallization Research forum, under the sponsorship of the Flat-Plate Solar Array Project consisted of five sessions, covering: (1) the current status of metallization systems, (2) system design, (3) thick-film metallization, (4) advanced techniques, and (5) future metallization challenges.Document ID19840013912Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsDate AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateNovember 15, 1983Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberJPL-5101-239JPL-PUB-83-93NAS 1.26:173477DOE/JPL-1012-92NASA-CR-173477Accession Number84N21980Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI01-76ET-20356Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840013912.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle19840013928WorkMetallization with generic metallo-organic inks19840013916WorkField test experience19840013931WorkTransparent conductive coatings19840013915WorkAccelerated degradation of silicon metallization systems19840013922WorkMetallization problems with concentrator cells19840013917WorkFundamentals of metal-semiconductor contacts19840013920WorkObservations of solar-cell metallization corrosion19840013919WorkDiffusion barriers19840013926WorkPolymer thick-film conductors and dielectrics for membrane switches and flexible circuitry19840013914WorkEconomic implications of current systems19840013930WorkLaser assisted deposition19840013929WorkDry etching of metallization19840013927WorkIonized cluster beam deposition19840013921WorkModule degradation catalyzed by metal-encapsulation reactions19840013925WorkNon-noble metal based metallization systems19840013913WorkSolar cell metallization:  Historical perspective19840013924WorkParticle size effects on viscosity of silver pastes:  A manufacturer's view19840013918WorkGetting the current out19840013932WorkIron-copper metallization for flexible solar/cell arrays19840013923WorkEffects of particle size distribution in thick film conductorsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0268

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

DESIRAE ELLEN MCDONOUGH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 28, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 21 2021

06/21/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0268
#### Clifford Miner, Appellant, v. George Sherman, Respondent.

Motion granted, order entered September 15, 1960, dismissing appeal, vacated, on condition appellant’s briefs are filed and served on or before November 1, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed on or before November 17, 1960 if appeal is to be argued at November 1960 Term.
Order entered February 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01036-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.L.V., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-56612-2021

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 15, 2023 motion for an extension of 

time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the brief tendered to 

this Court by appellant on February 15, 2023 filed as of the date of this order. 

Also before the Court is appellant’s February 6, 2023 motion for 

reconsideration of this Court’s January 26, 2023 order denying an extension 

motion. We DENY the motion as moot.

Appellee’s brief is due on or before March 8, 2023. Because this is an 

accelerated appeal involving the termination of parental rights, any extension 

request will be strongly disfavored.

/s/ EMILY MISKEL

JUSTICE
### §§44, 45. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(45), 65 Stat. 703

Section 44, act Mar. 15, 1920, ch. 100, §1, 41 Stat. 530; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. I, §201, eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2728, 53 Stat. 1424, related to transfer of surplus motor-propelled vehicles in War Department (now Department of the Army) to Federal Security Agency for use of Public Health Service.

Section 45, act Mar. 15, 1920, ch. 100, §4, 41 Stat. 531; 1939 Reorg. Plan No. I, §201, eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2728, 53 Stat. 1424, related to freight charges for transfer of motor-propelled vehicles in War Department (now Department of the Army) to Federal Security Agency for use of Public Health Service.
§ 203.437 Mortgages involving a dwelling unit in a cooperative housing development. ( a ) The provisions of §§ 203.251(d), 203.366 and 203.440 through 203.495 shall not apply to mortgages insured pursuant to section 203(n) of the National Housing Act.
( b ) References in this subpart to the term *deed* and *deed in lieu of foreclosure,* or the word *property* when found in the phrases *conveyance of property, acquisition of property,* or other phrases indicating transfer of property, shall be construed to mean the assignment of the Corporate Certificate and Occupancy Certificate. However, when the use of such terms, as interpreted in light of section 203(n) of the National Housing Act, clearly indicates that reference to the dwelling unit is intended, such terms shall mean the dwelling unit identified in the Occupancy Certificate.
( c ) In addition to the requirements of § 203.365, the mortgagee shall forward to the Secretary within 45 days after the transfer of the Corporate Certificate: ( 1 ) A statement certified by the officer of the corporation charged with maintenance of the Corporate Certificate Transfer Book that such book currently shows that the Secretary is the owner of the Corporate Certificate; and,
( 2 ) The Occupancy Certificate in the name of the Secretary.
( d ) The mortgagee shall tender to the Secretary good and marketable title to the Corporate Certificate and the exclusive right of permanent possession of the dwelling unit.
( e ) In lieu of the types of title evidence provided in § 203.385, the Secretary will accept a legal opinion signed by an attorney at law experienced in the examination of titles that the Secretary has good and marketable title to the Corporate Certificate and the exclusive right of possession of the dwelling unit.
( f ) The Secretary may accept assignment of mortgages insured under this part if it is determined by the Secretary that it is in the Department's interest to do so provided that the blanket mortgage is in default and the holder of such mortgage has announced an intention to foreclose.
[42 FR 40432, Aug. 10, 1977; 42 FR 57435, Nov. 2, 1977]
MW EPA CAA Testing Method 5 Dry Coke Scrubber

4 Hour Test Start Date Green Anode Production Particulate Particulate

tons/hr lbs/Ton green anode lbs/hr

4/23/2013 Run 1 21.99 0.0160 0.35

4/24/2013 Run 2 24.95 0.0123 0.31

4/24/2013 Run 3 24.42 0.0156 0.38

Plant Average 23.79 0.0146 0.35
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.62 Certifications.

Any agreement, undertaking, statement or certification required by the Commissioner shall specifically state that it has been made, presented, and delivered for the purpose of influencing an official action of the FHA, and of the Commissioner, and may be relied upon by the Commissioner as a true statement of the facts contained therein.
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2004-31 (the "Trust")

I, Millie
Cicero, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2004 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 30, 2005, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/MILLIE CICERO
      Name:  Millie
      CiceroTitle:    Assistant Treasurer |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 30, 2005
Exhibit
(32b)








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, William
M. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.








November
      10, 2009  /s/William
      M. McKay
              William
      M. McKay

                Chief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 10.14**

 

**New York Community Bancorp, Inc.**

**615 Merrick Avenue**

**Westbury, New York 11590**

 

June 27, 2003 

 

John L. Klag 

The Roslyn Savings Bank 

One Jericho Plaza 

Jericho, New York 11753-8905 

 

Dear John: 

 

I am pleased tohave this opportunity to set forth in writing certain additional information relating to your employment at New York Community Bank (the “Bank”) following the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan ofMerger (the “Merger Agreement”) entered between New York Community Bancorp, Inc. (the “Holding Company”) and Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. on this date. This letter is intended to supplement your new employment agreement with the HoldingCompany. 

 

At such time as you become an employee of the Bankunder your new employment agreement as a result of the merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement, you will receive a retention bonus of $600,000. However, if you voluntarily terminate employment prior to the completion of 365 days of employmentafter the Effective Time other than by reason of an “Event of Termination” (as defined in your new employment agreement), or if you are terminated for “Just Cause” (as defined in your new employment agreement) within such 365-dayperiod, you will immediately return to the Holding Company a portion of the retention bonus equal to the product of (x) the retention bonus and (y) a fraction the numerator of which is the total number of days remaining in such 365-day period andthe denominator of which is 365. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Merger Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article VI of the MergerAgreement, this letter agreement will be null and void. 

 

Pleaseacknowledge the foregoing in the space indicated below. 

 

Sincerely,

/s/ Joseph R. Ficalora

Joseph R. Ficalora

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Acknowledged and Agreed:

/s/ John L. Klag

John L. Klag

 

 

2
#### § 221.315 Certificate of tax assessment.

The mortgagee shall certify, as of the date of filing for record of the deed or assignment of the mortgage to the Commissioner, that the family unit is assessed and subject to assessment for taxes pertaining to that unit.