alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William M. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Emergent
Group Inc.;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

          4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

          5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

          6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 11, 2004                     /s/ William M. McKay
                                          --------------------
                                          William M. McKay,
                                          Chief Financial Officer
§ 206.211 Determination of principal residence and contact information. ( a ) *Annual certification.* At least once during each calendar year, the mortgagee shall verify the contact information for the borrower(s) and determine whether or not the property is the principal residence of at least one borrower. The mortgagee shall require each borrower to make an annual certification of his or her contact information and principal residence. As part of the annual certification, the borrower may designate an alternate individual as specified in § 206.40 to receive copies of the notifications from the mortgagee, and who the mortgagee shall contact if the borrower is unwilling or unable to reply to requests from the mortgagee. The mortgagee may rely on the certification unless it has information indicating that the certification may be false.
( b ) *Requirements when an Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse exists.* Where an Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse has been identified, the mortgagee shall obtain an additional annual certification from the borrower confirming the Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse remains his or her spouse and the Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse continues to reside in the property as his or her principal residence. ( 1 ) *Death of borrower with Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse.* If a borrower with an Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse has died, the mortgagee shall obtain the annual certification in paragraph (a) of this section from the Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse” shall replace the term “borrower” in paragraph (a) of this section.
( 2 ) *Failure of previously Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse to reside in the property as his or her principal residence.* If a Non-Borrowing Spouse fails to reside in the property as his or her principal residence, the Non-Borrowing Spouse becomes an Ineligible Non-Borrowing Spouse and the deferral of due and payable status that would prevent the displacement of an Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse will no longer be in effect. Once this occurs, the Eligible Non-Borrowing Spouse annual certifications are no longer required to be obtained.
#### § 902.3 Board staff.

The chairperson shall select the Board's executive secretary and other staff provided for in the Act. The executive secretary and staff shall be responsible only to the Board through the chairperson.

[50 FR 31354, Aug. 2, 1985]
#### Albert Mechtold, Respondent, v. William S. Tilford, as Building Inspector of the Town of Oyster Bay, et al., Defendants, and Jean V. Kessler et al., Appellants.

-In an action by a taxpayer, pursuant to section 51 of the General Municipal Law, to enjoin the construction of a certain dwelling house, defendants other than the Town of Oyster Bay and its building inspector appeal from an order dated July 22, 1954, granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction *pendente lite*and denying the motion of the appealing defendants to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and from an order of resettlement dated August 17, 1954. Resettled order dated August 17, 1954, modified by striking out of the paragraph which grants the injunction everything beginning with the words “and are further enjoined” and ending with the words “in question”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Respondent’s motion papers sought *1165an injunction only with respect to the construction of one particular dwelling, consistent with the cause of action set forth in the complaint. The injunction should not have been made to extend to thirty-two additional constructions. Appeal from order dated July 22, 1954, dismissed, without costs. That order was superseded by the order of resettlement. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Ughetta, JJ., concur. [205 Misc. 1063.]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (EST), February 17, 2004.

Place: 4th Floor, Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

    1. Approval of the minutes of the January 20, 2004, Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.

Part Closed to the Public

    3. Personnel matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office 
of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: February 4, 2004.
Elizabeth S. Woodruff,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 04-2784 Filed 2-5-04; 10:51 am]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS 

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00125-CR 

NO. 02-17-00126-CR 

MARVIN BRIGHT THOMAS APPELLANT

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- 

FROM THE 396TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NOS. 1464244D, 1464246D 

---------- 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT 

---------- 

We have considered the “State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeals as Moot” and 

appellant Marvin Bright Thomas’s response in which he agrees that his appeals 

are moot and that dismissal is appropriate. We grant the motion and dismiss both 

appeals as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Ex parte Morgan, 335 S.W.2d 766, 

766 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960). 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 
2 

/s/ Elizabeth Kerr 

ELIZABETH KERR 

JUSTICE 

PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; KERR and PITTMAN, JJ. 

DO NOT PUBLISH 

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) 

DELIVERED: January 18, 2018
§ 180.315 Standards of conduct. ( a ) All persons appearing in proceedings under this part shall act with integrity and in an ethical manner.
( b ) The ALJ may exclude parties or their representatives for refusal to comply with directions, continued use of dilatory tactics, refusal to adhere to reasonable standards of orderly and ethical conduct, failure to act in good faith, or violations of the prohibitions against ex parte communications. An attorney who is suspended or barred from participation may appeal to another ALJ designated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge. The proceeding will not be delayed or suspended pending disposition on the appeal, except that the ALJ shall suspend the proceeding for a reasonable time to enable the party to obtain another attorney.
[61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 13723, Mar. 13, 2008; 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022]
### §5668. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5668 was editorially reclassified as section 11174 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
**Exhibit 12(a)(2)**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, MarioAlberto Gonzalez Padilla, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of DesarrolladoraHomex, S.A.B. de C.V.;

2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4. Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the company’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5. Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a. all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
|                           |   | /s/ Mario Alberto Gonzalez Padilla |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Name:                              |   | Mario Alberto Gonzalez Padilla |
|                      |   | Title:                             |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |   |                               |   |   |
|                      |   |                               |   |   |
| Date: June 29,  2006 |   |                               |   |   |

 

----

 

----
**Survey of Participants in Technical Assistance or Continuing Education Activities**

**Instructions: At the conclusion of a technical assistance or a continuing education activity, please distribute a survey to determine whether the participants found the act**  **ivity beneficial. This information will assist you as you plan future activities with your state VR**  **agencies and their partners. The information you collect will also**  **help RSA determine the effectiveness of the technical assistance and continuing educati**  **on you are providing. Questions that must be included in your survey for participants in**  **T echnical**  **A ssistance**  **Activities** Relevance question: The assistance provided was relevant to the goals of my agency : strongl y agree, agree, neut ral, disagree, or strongl y disagree Effectiveness question: These technical assistance activities will be useful in improving my agency ’s policies/practices/capacit y: strongl y agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongl y disagree Quality qu estion: Overall, I found that this was high quality technical assistance: strongl y agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongl y disagree **Questions that must be included in your survey for participants in Continuing Education**  **Activities** Rel evance question: The content presented was relevant to my job: strongl y agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree Effectiveness question: This training activity increased m y knowledge/skills/abilities: strongl y agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree Quality question: Overall, I found that this was a high quality training activity : strongl y agree, agree, neutral, disagree, or strongl y disagree

**Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement** According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection display s a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to avera ge 3 minut es per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is voluntary. S end comments regarding the burden estimate or an y other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Mary land Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210

- 4537 or email IC DocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1820

- 0690 . Note: Please do not return the completed Survey of Participants in Technical Assistance or Continuing Education Activities to this address.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BILLY RAY CRAWFORD, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District 

Judge. (4:05-cr-00470-TLW-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy Ray Crawford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, 

Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Billy Ray Crawford, Jr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion to reduce sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 

35(b) or U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. 

Crawford argues on appeal that the Government obligated itself 

in the plea agreement to move for a downward departure for his 

substantial assistance. We affirm. 

It is well-settled that whether to file a Rule 35(b) motion 

is a matter left to the Government’s discretion. Fed. R. Crim. 

P. 35(b); United States v. Dixon, 998 F.2d 228, 230 (4th Cir. 

1993). A court may remedy the Government’s refusal to move for 

a sentence reduction under Rule 35(b) if: (1) the Government 

has obligated itself in the plea agreement to move for the 

reduction; or (2) the Government’s refusal to move for the

reduction was based on an unconstitutional motive. Wade v. 

United States, 504 U.S. 181, 185-86 (1992). 

After review of the record, we conclude that neither 

circumstance is present here. The plea agreement between 

Crawford and the Government clearly establishes that the 

decision whether to file a Rule 35(b) motion rested with the 

Government’s discretion, and Crawford did not claim in the 

motion to reduce sentence that the Government’s refusal to file 

a Rule 35(b) motion was based on an unconstitutional motive. 
3

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 5/3/2012 Form REP-702 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Sample Number: 121815-001 Date Collected:04/19/2012 14:45 Date Received:4/20/2012 

### Trip Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.5 0.5 TLT EPA 1631E 0.2 04/30/2012 

### Sample Number: 121815-002 Date Collected:04/19/2012 14:45 Date Received:4/20/2012 

### Field Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.5 0.5 TLT EPA 1631E 0.2 04/30/2012 

### Sample Number: 121815-003 Date Collected:04/11/2012 11:00 Date Received:4/20/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 79.1 5 TLT EPA 1631E 2 04/30/2012 

### Sample Number: 121815-004 Date Collected:04/19/2012 14:50 Date Received:4/20/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 23.3 5 TLT EPA 1631E 2 04/30/2012 

### Sample Number: 121815-005 Date Collected:04/19/2012 14:50 Date Received:4/20/2012 

### CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 99.1 10 TLT EPA 1631E 4 04/30/2012 

### Sample Number: 121815-006 Date Collected:04/19/2012 14:50 Date Received:4/20/2012 

### Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ng/L Mercury, Hg 2.8 2 TLT EPA 1631E 1 04/30/2012

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 121815 Page 1 of 1
### §8906. Updated data base on acid content in precipitation; new monitoring site not required

(a)(1) The National Weather Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall maintain an updated data base describing the acid content in precipitation in the United States, using information from Federal acid precipitation monitoring sites.

(2) Such data shall be available to interested parties by Weather Service Forecast Offices in the National Weather Service, or through such other facilities or means as the Assistant Administrator for Weather Services, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, shall direct, for those areas of the United States where and at such time as such information is presently available, within 120 days after November 17, 1988.

(3) Where other Federal agencies collect such data in the course of carrying out their statutory missions, the heads of those agencies and the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall arrange for the transfer of such data to the National Weather Service.

(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to require any Federal agency to establish any new acid precipitation monitoring site.

(Pub. L. 100–685, title IV, §414, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 1989, and not as part of the Acid Precipitation Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120430.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:05 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0430 Focus Ready Draft 7/23/2012 ENGINEER: Jon \ DDH PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE:file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120430.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:05 AM] Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (07/06/2012): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T1 . Health: 2 Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

:file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120430.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:05 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0430file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120430.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:05 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0430file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120430.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:05 AM]file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120430.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:05 AM]
#### § 1510.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to effectuate section 119 of the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, which amended section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs or activities conducted by Executive agencies or the United States Postal Service.
### §9008. Definitions

As used in this chapter, the term—

(1) "ocean thermal energy conversion" means a method of converting part of the heat from the Sun which is stored in the surface layers of a body of water into electrical energy or energy product equivalent;

(2) "energy product equivalent" means an energy carrier including, but not limited to, ammonia, hydrogen, or molten salts or an energy-intensive commodity, including, but not limited to, electrometals, fresh water, or nutrients for aquaculture; and

(3) "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy.

(Pub. L. 96–310, §9, July 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 946.)
#### § 92.71 Fees for letters rogatory executed by officials in the United States.

Arrangements for the payment of fees should be made directly with the court in the United States by the party in the foreign country at whose request the depositions are taken, either through his legal representative in the United States or through the appropriate diplomatic or consular officer of his country in the United States. (See § 92.67 regarding the execution of letters rogatory in the United States.)