alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9125. Judicial review

Any person suffering legal wrong, or who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the Administrator's decision to issue, transfer, modify, renew, suspend, or terminate a license may, not later than 60 days after such decision is made, seek judicial review of such decision in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. A person shall be deemed to be aggrieved by the Administrator's decision within the meaning of this chapter if he—

(1) has participated in the administrative proceedings before the Administrator (or if he did not so participate, he can show that his failure to do so was caused by the Administrator's failure to provide the required notice); and

(2) is adversely affected by the Administrator's action.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title I, §115, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in introductory provisions, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–320, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 974, known as the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9101 of this title and Tables.
§ 206.136 Conditions for assignment. ( a ) In order for a HECM to be eligible for assignment, the following must be met: ( 1 ) *Priority of mortgage to liens.* The mortgage is prior to all mechanics' and materialmen's liens, regardless of when such liens attach, and prior to all liens and encumbrances, or defects which may arise based on any act or omission by the mortgagee except such liens or other matters as may have been approved by the Commissioner.
( 2 ) *Amount due.* The amount stated in the instrument of assignment is actually due and owing under the mortgage.
( 3 ) *Offsets or counterclaims.* There are no offsets or counterclaims thereto and the mortgagee has a good right to assign.
( b ) The mortgagee shall certify that the conditions of paragraph (a) have been met.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, G. Robert Tatum, the Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of
BEVsystems International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 27, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

October 14, 2003


                                            /s/ G. Robert Tatum
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Name: G. Robert Tatum
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
### §7618. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–549, title I, §108(q), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2469

Section, act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §318, as added Aug. 7, 1977, Pub. L. 95–95, title III, §308, 91 Stat. 780, related to financial disclosure and conflicts of interest.
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |  |  |
| Delaware(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation) | 001-02217(CommissionFile Number) | 58-0628465(IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |

|                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                             |  |  |
| One Coca-Cola PlazaAtlanta, Georgia(Address of principal executive offices) |   | 30313(Zip Code) |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

----

|              |
|--------------|
|              |  |
| Exhibit No.  | Description |
| Exhibit 99.1 | Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated October 21, 2014, reportingThe Coca-Cola Company's financial results for the third quarter and year-to-date 2014. |
| Exhibit 99.2 | Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated October 21, 2014. |

----

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
|                    |   | THE COCA-COLA COMPANY(REGISTRANT) |
|                    |   |   |
| Date:  October 21, 2014 | By: | /s/ LARRY M. MARK |
|                    |   | Larry M. MarkVice President and Controller |

----

|              |
|--------------|
|              |  |
| Exhibit No.  | Description |
| Exhibit 99.1 | Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated October 21, 2014, reportingThe Coca-Cola Company's financial results for the third quarter and year-to-date 2014. |
| Exhibit 99.2 | Press Release of The Coca-Cola Company, dated October 21, 2014. |
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:11:53-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### SI Group Check # 511345 SI12121212134269794 SI12G0

X
X Page 1 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### X


## X Page 2 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX

XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X

X X X X X Page 3 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X

XXX 

## X XXX 

## X 323382 IES Order CBI.pdf 

### XXX 

## X See Attachment 002 (Molecular Structure for CBI.doc)

Molecular Structure for CBI.doc Page 4 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX

XXX
XXX 

## X X X
Page 5 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 6 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 7 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX

XXX Alkylphenol 

## X X XXX XXX XXX 

### X XXX XXX XXX 

### X

XXX XXX 

### X XXX XXX 

### X Page 8 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### XXX XXX 

## X

X Product to be toll produced and sold to customer for reaction into a lubricant application Reactant for a Lubricant Additive 100 100 0 0 100 0

Page 9 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X XXX XXX XXX 

## X 1

XXX 

## X XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX 

## X

Page 10 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONSee Attachment 003 (SI12G0 Process Flow - Sanitized.xls)

SI12G0 Process Flow - Sanitized.xls Page 11 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONSampling Gloves, Goggles, Protective Clothing Liquid up to 97% 2 0.5 5 Filter Change Gloves, Goggles, Protective Clothing Liquid up to 97% 2 4 5 Packaging Gloves, Goggles, Protective Clothing Liquid up to 97% 2 4 5

Page 12 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONWaste 0 0.02% Off-site Incineration Incineration 0

Page 13 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

### 1

XXX 

## X Page 14 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONP10SB1(a)(4)1 Part II, Section B, 1(a)(4). Operation Site Locations

Used in Painesville, OH - The Lubrizol Company

Page 15 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONXXX 

## X

Chargin g at 2 8 5 Gloves, Goggles, Protective Clothing / Liquid 100 97

0 0 Samplin g of Use 2 0.5 5 Gloves, Goggles, Protective Clothing / Liquid 100 97

0 0
Page 16 SANITIZED SUBMISSIONPage 17 SANITIZED SUBMISSION001 CAS Services CBI IES Order CBI.pdf Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. 1 002 Molecular Structure - CBI Molecular Structure for CBI.doc Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. 1 003 Process Flow - Sanitized SI12G0 Process Flow - Sanitized.xls Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d. 1 004 Sanitized MSDS MSDS - CBI SI12G0.pdf 9

Page 18 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## X 0.87 - 0.89 Estimate <1 Estimate 20 < - 5 Estimate >250 Estimate 6.354 Estimate Combustible IIIA Estimate Page 19 SANITIZED SUBMISSION

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 001 Attachment Name CAS Services CBI 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SI12121212134269794

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 002 Attachment Name Molecular Structure - CBI 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1e. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SI12121212134269794

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 003 Attachment Name Process Flow - Sanitized 

## Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d. Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SI12121212134269794

## ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 004 Attachment Name Sanitized MSDS 

## Associated PMN Section Number

N/A Does not contain CBI 

## Report Number SI12121212134269794
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00317-CR

Bennie Fuelberg, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BLANCO COUNTY, 424TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR01015, HONORABLE DANIEL H. MILLS, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

We abated this appeal and remanded this cause for a new hearing, with instructions to

address whether, under an objective reasonable-person standard, the Honorable Judge Daniel H. Mills

(1) was disqualified as an injured party from hearing this case or (2) should have been recused

because his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. See Fuelberg v. State, 410 S.W.3d 498,

510–11 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013, no pet.). The district court has since filed a supplemental clerk’s

record with an order concluding that Judge Mills was not disqualified and should not have been

recused. This appeal is reinstated.

We request supplemental briefings from the parties on the limited issue of whether

the district court erred in concluding that Judge Mills should not have been disqualified or recused. 
The appellant should file his brief no later than February 6, 2014. The State’s response will be due

within thirty (30) days of the filing of the appellant’s brief.

It is so ordered this 7th day of January 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Do Not Publish

2
### §8272. Photovoltaic energy program

There is hereby established a photovoltaic energy commercialization program for the accelerated procurement and installation of photovoltaic solar electric systems for electric production in Federal facilities.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title V, §563, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3280.)
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 99(iv)

                                  Certification


                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                            OF TICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    (S) 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tice Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Sharon Draper, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     Date:  February 6, 2003
                                        /s/ Sharon Draper
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Sharon Draper, Chief Accounting Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

GRADY RODRIGUAS BRYE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4243 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 3, 2018, Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Grady Rodriguas Brye, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                         273,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,704,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (65,198)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,725,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,598,439
<PP&E>                                       7,906,111
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,688,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,173,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,772,044
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,397
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,298,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,173,013
<SALES>                                     35,720,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,720,386
<CGS>                                       12,370,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,622,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             553,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,174,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   887,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,287,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,287,041
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE

JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE

ANNETTE JACKSON, 

Plaintiffs,

 v.

G. LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of

the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge

# 275), C. SMITH, individually and as an officer of

the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge #

285), P. DUMPA, individually and as an officer of

the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge #

291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually

and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police

Department (Badge # 274), 

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01016 WHA

JUDGMENT

Based on the jury verdict in this case, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Frederick

Jackson and jointly and severally in the amount of $250,000.00 against Officer C. Smith, Officer

P. Dumpa, and Officer G. Lombardi. Additionally, further judgment is entered in favor of

plaintiff Frederick Jackson and without joint and several liability against Officer C. Smith in the

amount of $6,500.00, Officer P. Dumpa in the amount of $2,500.00, and Officer G. Lombardi in 

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 199 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the amount of $7,500.00. Judgment is otherwise entered in favor of defendants and against

plaintiffs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 23, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 199 Filed 07/23/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2891 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2891

      To establish a servitude and emancipation archival research 
                clearinghouse in the National Archives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

 Mr. Cummings introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To establish a servitude and emancipation archival research 
                clearinghouse in the National Archives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Servitude and Emancipation Archival 
Research ClearingHouse Act of 2005'' or the ``SEARCH Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF DATABASE.

    (a) In General.--The Archivist of the United States shall 
establish, as a part of the National Archives, a national database 
consisting of historic records of servitude and emancipation in the 
United States to assist African Americans in researching their 
genealogy.
    (b) Maintenance.--The database established by this Act shall be 
maintained by the National Historical Publications and Records 
Commission.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated--
            (1) $5,000,000 to establish the national database 
        authorized by this Act; and
            (2) $5,000,000 to provide grants to States and colleges and 
        universities to preserve local records of servitude and 
        emancipation.
                                 <all>
```
#### Pauline S. Gelfand et al., Appellants, v. Abraham Schoen et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the notice of appeal states that the appeal is by plaintiffs from a decision denying their motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The record contains an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 11, 1960, denying such motion, and we have treated the appeal as one which seeks a review of the order. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from decision dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies therefrom. Beldock, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Amendment No.1 to the Settlement Agreement dated May 19, 2010



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 dated as of July 2, 2010 (this “Amendment”), to the SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT dated as of May 19, 2010 (the “Settlement Agreement”), by and between
MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation (“MasterCard”), and HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation (“HPS”). Terms defined in the Settlement Agreement and not otherwise defined
herein are used herein as so defined. The Settlement Agreement as amended by this Amendment is herein called the “Amended Settlement Agreement.” 
 1. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 4.2 of the Settlement Agreement, HPS and MasterCard hereby agree that, if the Unsatisfied Threshold Event shall not have occurred or if the
Opt-In Threshold Condition shall have been waived as provided in Section 4.1, MasterCard shall deliver (as provided in clause (a), (b) or (d) of Section 10.1) to HPS no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern time on July 9, 2010 the
Alternative Recovery Acceptance Report. 
 2. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which will
be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute but one and the same instrument. A facsimile signature shall be deemed an original for purposes of this Amendment. This Amendment will become effective when it has been duly executed
and delivered by each of the parties hereto. 
 3. Except to the extent specifically amended by this Amendment, the Settlement
Agreement shall remain unmodified, and the Amended Settlement Agreement is hereby confirmed as being in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Settlement Agreement as an agreement under seal as of the date first above
written. 
  

	
	MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
	
	 /s/ Wendy Murdock

	     Wendy Murdock
	     Chief Franchise Officer
	
	HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
	
	 /s/ Charles H.N. Kallenbach

	     Charles H.N. Kallenbach
	     General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2609 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2609

       To suspend temporarily the duty on Cloquintocet Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Terry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on Cloquintocet Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLOQUINTOCET TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.90.19       Cloquintocet       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Technical -                                                        31/2008
                         Acetic acid, [5-
                         chloro-8-
                         quinolinyl]oxy]-,
                         1-methyhexyl
                         ester (CAS No.
                         99607-70-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2933.49.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 906.9 Failure of party to appear.

The hearing may proceed in the absence of any party who, after due notice and without good cause, fails to be present or obtain an adjournment.