alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §8008. Funding procedures

(a) The Secretary shall establish procedures—

(1) to assure timely payments to nonprofit corporations and public housing agencies for approved assisted congregate services programs with provision made for advance funding sufficient to meet necessary startup costs;

(2) to permit reallocation of funds approved for the establishment of congregate services in existing public housing projects and projects assisted under section 1701q of title 12 if the services are not established within six months of the notification date of funding approval;

(3) to assure that where such funding has been approved for the establishment of congregate services for public housing projects and projects assisted under section 1701q of title 12 under construction or approved for construction, these services shall be in place at the start of the project's occupancy by tenants requiring such services for maintaining independent living;

(4) to establish accounting and other standards in order to prevent any fraudulent or inappropriate use of funds under this chapter; and

(5) to assure that no more than 1 per centum of the funds appropriated under this chapter for any fiscal year may be used by public housing agencies and nonprofit corporations for evaluative purposes as required by section 8007(b)(1) of this title.

(b) The Secretary shall establish a reserve fund, not to exceed 10 per centum of the funds appropriated in each fiscal year for the provision of services under this chapter, in order to supplement grants awarded to public housing agencies and nonprofit corporations under this chapter when, in the determination of the Secretary, such supplemental adjustments are required to maintain adequate levels of services to eligible project residents.

(Pub. L. 95–557, title IV, §409, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2109.)
#### § 1000.224 Can any part of the IHP be waived?

Yes. HUD has general authority under section 101(b)(2) of NAHASDA to waive any IHP requirements when an Indian tribe cannot comply with IHP requirements due to exigent circumstances beyond its control, for a period of not more than 90 days. The waiver authority under section 101(b)(2) of NAHASDA provides flexibility to address the needs of every Indian tribe, including small Indian tribes. The waiver may be requested by the Indian tribe or its TDHE (if such authority is delegated by the Indian tribe), and such waiver shall not be unreasonably withheld.

[77 FR 71526, Dec. 3, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Metris Companies Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,095
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                38,286
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        359,517
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,665
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                   153,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            206,499
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                     165,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 525,665
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 42,645
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,270
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   568
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                44,483
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,930
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           38,553
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   28,589
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 94,633
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,519
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      27,994
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,994
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    16.9
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    22,847
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,829
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   20,834
<RECOVERIES>                                       448
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,847
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            23,847
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: September 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 189)]
[Notices]               
[Page 60495-60496]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30se10-130]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at Monroe Regional Airport, Monroe, LA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Request for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
release of land at Monroe Regional Airport under the provisions of 
Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address:

Mr. Lacey D. Spriggs, Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, LA/NM

[[Page 60496]]

Airports Development Office, ASW-640, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort 
Worth, Texas 76137-0640.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mayor James E. Mayo at the following address:

Office of the Mayor, P.O. Box 123, Monroe, LA 71210.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lacey D. Spriggs, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, LA/NM Airports Development Office, ASW-640, 
2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137-0640.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Monroe Regional Airport.
    On September 20, 2010, the FAA determined that the request to 
release property at Monroe Regional Airport submitted by the City of 
Monroe met the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation 
Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in 
part, no later than November 15, 2010.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Monroe, Louisiana requests the release of 1.643 acres 
of airport property. The release of property will allow for 
construction of a new facility for office space and warehouse for JAF 
Properties, LP to proceed. The sale is estimated to provide $45,200.00 
whereas the proceeds will be used to continue the Bermuda Release 
Program and used to upgrade and expand the security camera system to 
include more of the Security Passenger Holding area as well as cameras 
for airfield surveillance.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.''
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the 
Monroe Regional Airport, Monroe, Louisiana.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on September 21, 2010.
Joseph G. Washington,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-24541 Filed 9-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Ronald L. Richman, SBN 139189 

Susan J. Olson, SBN 152467 

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC 

601 California Street, Suite 1800 

San Francisco, California 94108 

Telephone: 415.352.2700 

Facsimile: 415.352.2701 

E-Mail: ron.richman@bullivant.cona 

E-Mail: susan.olson@bullivant.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT 

MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT 

MASONS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT 

MASONS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; AND BOARD 

OF TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS 

TRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA, 

Plaintiffs, 

V. 

ALL WEST CONSTRUCTION, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Defendant. 

STIPULATION 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Boards of Trustees of the 

Cement Masons Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of 

the Cement Masons Vacation-Holiday Trust Fund for Northern California, Board of Trustees of 

the Cement Masons Pension Trust Fund for Northern California, and Board of Trustees of the 

Cement Masons Training Trust Fund for Northern California ("Cement Masons Trust Funds"), 

on the one hand, and Defendant All West Construction, Inc. ("All West Construction"), on the 

— 1 — 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON 

Case No.: C 09-01732 JSW 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER 

THEREON 

Case 3:09-cv-01732-JSW Document 19 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-01732-JSW Document18 Filed05/03/10 Page1 of 3
other hand, through their respective counsel, that pursuant to a binding settlement entered into 

by and between the parties, that this Court dismiss this case, without prejudice, each party to 

bear their own costs and fees. 

DATED: May 3, 2010 

BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC 

By /s/ 

Ronald L. Richman 

Susan J. Olson 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Cement Masons Trust Funds 

DATED: May 3, 2010 

HAWKINS — BOHMAN 

By /s/ 

Scott C. Hawkins 

Attorneys for Defendant 

All West Construction, Inc. 

— 2 — 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON 

Case 3:09-cv-01732-JSW Document 19 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-01732-JSW Document18 Filed05/03/10 Page2 of 3
ORDER 

The parties having submitted this Stipulation To Dismiss Case Without Prejudice and 

good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is hereby dismissed, without prejudice, each 

side to bear their own costs and fees. 

DATED: May, , 2010 

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

12519488.1 

— 3 — 

STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER THEREON 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case3:09-cv-01732-JSW Document18 Filed05/03/10 Page3 of 3

4

Case 3:09-cv-01732-JSW Document 19 Filed 05/04/10 Page 3 of 3
### §9706. Dissemination of information

The Secretary shall assure that full and complete safety-related information resulting from any project or other activity conducted under this chapter is made available in a timely manner to appropriate committees of Congress, Federal, State, and local authorities, relevant segments of private industry, the scientific community, and the public.

(Pub. L. 96–567, §7, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3332.)
#### Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., Petitioner, v New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss petition on the ground the order of the Human Rights Appeal Board, dated September 12, 1977, is nonfinal and therefore not reviewable by this court. Motion denied, without costs (Executive Law, § 298; *Matter of New York City Housing Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights,*53 AD2d 844, 845). Respondent’s brief shall be filed and served within 20 days of the date of service of a copy of the order to be entered on this decision. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Christopher Sophinos, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of On Command
Corporation (this Amendment); and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Amendment.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 24, 2003
    
    By:
    /s/ CHRISTOPHER SOPHINOSName:
    Christopher SophinosTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of New York Regional Rail Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Joel Marcus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Joel Marcus
   -----------------------
   Joel Marcus
   Chief Financial Officer

August 21, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] EXCLUDING TIME

CR 09-1112 MHP 1

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

KEVIN J. BARRY (CABN 229748)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 Email: kevin.barry@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

CARLOS MIRANDA-GODOY,

 a/k/a Carlos Miranda,

 a/k/a Andres Ricardo Sarceno,

 Defendant.

 _________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No.: 09-1112 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18

U.S.C. § 3161

On January 25, 2010, the parties in this case appeared before the Court for a status

conference. At that time, the Court set a further status hearing for February 8, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

The parties agreed to exclude the period of time between January 25, 2010 and February 8, 2010

from any time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The parties represented that granting

the exclusion would allow the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation of counsel. 

See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties also agree that the ends of justice served by

granting such an exclusion of time outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in

a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). At the hearing, the Court made findings consistent

Case 3:09-cr-01112-CRB Document 12 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] EXCLUDING TIME

CR 09-1112 MHP 2

with this agreement.

SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

DATED: January 26, 2010 /s/ 

KEVIN J. BARRY

Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: January 26, 2010 /s/ 

ELIZABETH M. FALK

Attorney for CARLOS MIRANDA-GODOY

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons stated above and at the January 25, 2010 hearing, the Court finds that the

exclusion from the time limits applicable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 of the period from January 25,

2010 through February 8, 2010 is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18

U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested exclusion of time would deny counsel

for the defendant and for the Government the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage

of justice. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _______________________________________

 THE HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge 

1/27/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01112-CRB Document 12 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2
ORDER AFTER STIPULATION OF PARTIES GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE THIRD-PARTY 

COMPLAINT 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ROGER L. MEREDITH, ESQ. - #83803 

INGRID A. EBERLE, ESQ. - #220342 

ANGELA T. MITCHELL, ESQ. - #241188 

LAW OFFICES OF ROGER L. MEREDITH 

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 496 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 616-5959 

Facsimile: (415) 788-3234 

Attorney for Defendants 

PIZZA PINO & KITCHEN, 

SAID BELAYADI, SABOUNE OUSSAMA 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CRAIG YATES, an individual; and 

DISABILITY RIGHTS, ENFORCEMENT, 

EDUCATION, SERVICES: HELPING YOU 

HELP OTHERS, a California public benefit 

corporation, 

 PLAINTIFFS, 

V. 

PIZZA PINO & KITCHEN; SABOUNE 

OUSSAMA; SAID BELAYADI; and 

OCTAVIA INVESTMENTS CO., LTD., a 

California Limited Partnership, 

 DEFENDANTS. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CV-09-1592-MHP 

ORDER AFTER STIPULATION OF 

PARTIES GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE 

AND SERVE THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

 All parties to the instant action have stipulated and agreed that Defendants PIZZA PINO 

& KITCHEN, SAID BELAYADI, and SABOUNE OUSSAMA may file and serve a Third-Party 

Complaint against EZZELDIN AHMAD ABUALHASSAN individually and d.b.a. 

CONTEMPO GOLD STAR INSURANCE MARKETING and GOLDEN EAGLE 

INSURANCE . 

Case 3:09-cv-01592-EMC Document 12 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2
ORDER AFTER STIPULATION OF PARTIES GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE THIRD-PARTY 

COMPLAINT 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 As all parties have stipulated and consented that the third parties be joined, and the Court 

finding no obstacle to the joinder of the third parties, it is: 

ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiffs may file and serve the Third-Party 

Complaint attached to the motion on EZZELDIN AHMADABUALHASSAN 

individually and d.b.a. CONTEMPO GOLD STAR INSURANCE MARKETING 

and GOLDEN EAGLE INSURANCE. 

2. The Clerk of this Court will issue a Summons and deliver it to the moving 

Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs for service on the Third-Party Defendants 

along with a copy of the Third-Party Complaint as shown in the attachment to the 

motion. 

3. The moving Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff must serve or cause to be served 

the Summons and Third-Party Complaint on the Third-Party Defendant in the 

manner specified in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and must do 

so forthwith, and in no even later than __________________[date]. 

Date: _______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Belayadi-3rdOrd2-pldg 

April 1, 2010 3/9/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-01592-EMC Document 12 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rotate Black, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Paulsen, Chief Executuve Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |                                                                  |                 
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------
|Date: March 31, 2009 | By:                                                              | /s/ John Paulsen
|                     | John Paulsen
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**INTERLINE BRANDS,INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Grebe,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| /s/ MICHAEL  J. GREBE   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe        |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| March 13, 2007     |

 

----
### §8342. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–42, §1(a)(2), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 310

Section, Pub. L. 95–620, title III, §302, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3306, authorized Secretary to prohibit use of petroleum or natural gas as primary energy source in existing major fuel-burning installations having coal or alternate fuel capability and, in installations in which mixtures of petroleum or natural gas and coal or other alternate fuels are found feasible, to prohibit excessive use of petroleum or natural gas in such mixtures.