alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Bruce J. Haber,
      Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      registrant.




Date:
August
                13, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Bruce
              J. HaberBruce
              J. HaberChief
                Executive Officer
#### § 213.268 Final insurance endorsement.

When all advances of mortgage or loan proceeds have been made and all the terms and conditions of the commitment have been complied with to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, he shall indicate on the original credit instrument the total of all advances he has approved for insurance and again endorse such instrument.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,601
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     67,721
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,909
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             6,006
<LOANS>                                        129,294
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,426
<DEPOSITS>                                     189,708
<SHORT-TERM>                                    23,850
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,897
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,011
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 242,426
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,802
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,362
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   676
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,840
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,983
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,653
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,187
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,012
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,012
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,383
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .066
<LOANS-NON>                                         47
<LOANS-PAST>                                         7
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,158
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       50
<RECOVERIES>                                        74
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,482
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,482
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### ANTONIO RIVERA *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 25238)

Flynn, Bishop and McLachlan, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 24

officially released March 29, 2005

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.
### §6866. Monitoring and evaluation of funded projects; technical assistance; limitation on assistance

The Secretary, in coordination with the Director, shall monitor and evaluate the operation of projects receiving financial assistance under this part through methods provided for in section 6867(a) of this title, through onsite inspections, or through other means, in order to assure the effective provision of weatherization assistance for the dwelling units of low-income persons. The Secretary shall also carry out periodic evaluations of the program authorized by this part and projects receiving financial assistance under this part. The Secretary may provide technical assistance to any such project, directly and through persons and entities with a demonstrated capacity in developing and implementing appropriate technology for enhancing the effectiveness of the provision of weatherization assistance to the dwelling units of low-income persons, utilizing in any fiscal year not to exceed up to 20 percent of the sums appropriated for such year under this part.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title IV, §416, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1156; Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §577(2), June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 760; Pub. L. 111–5, div. A, title IV, §407(d), Feb. 17, 2009, 123 Stat. 146.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–5 substituted "up to 20 percent" for "10 percent".

1980—Pub. L. 96–294 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator" wherever appearing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALVIN RONNEL ROSS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. LATRAILLE; J. CALLOW,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-16764

D.C. No. 1:08-cv-01886-GSA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Gary S. Austin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted January 20, 2016*** 

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Alvin Ronnel Ross, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a First

FILED

JAN 28 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 **

The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c). 

 

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Amendment retaliation claim arising out of his removal from his work assignment. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Brodheim v.

Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1267 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Ross’ retaliation

claim against defendant Callow because Ross failed to raise a genuine dispute of

material fact as to whether Callow’s actions did not reasonably advance a

legitimate correctional goal. See id. at 1269 (setting forth the elements of a

retaliation claim in the prison context); Pratt v. Rowland, 65 F.3d 802, 806-07 (9th

Cir. 1995) (explaining that it is the plaintiff’s burden to prove the absence of a

legitimate correctional goal and that courts “should afford appropriate deference

and flexibility to prison officials” when evaluating proffered legitimate goals

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Schroeder v. McDonald,

55 F.3d 454, 461 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Legitimate goals of a correctional institution

include the preservation of internal order and discipline and the maintenance of

institutional security.”). 

Contrary to Ross’ contention, the district court addressed his state law

claims against defendant Latraille when it declined to exercise supplemental

jurisdiction over the claims.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

2 14-16764
in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam);

see also United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or

facts not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.

3 14-16764
#### § 309.21 Suspension of collection.

Suspension of collection action shall be made in accordance with the standards set forth in the FCCS (31 CFR 903.1-903.2).
### §9707. Comprehensive program management plan

#### (a) Preparation; scope; consultative requirements

The Secretary is authorized and directed to prepare a comprehensive program management plan for the conduct of research, development, and demonstration activities under this chapter consistent with the provisions of section 9703 of this title. In the preparation of such plan, the Secretary shall consult with the Commission and the Advisory Committee and with the heads of such other Government agencies and such public and private organizations as he deems appropriate.

#### (b) Transmission to Congressional committees; revisions

The Secretary shall transmit the comprehensive program management plan along with any comments by the Commission on the plan to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate within twelve months after December 22, 1980. Revisions to the plan shall be transmitted to such committees whenever deemed appropriate by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 96–567, §8, Dec. 22, 1980, 94 Stat. 3332; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1051(l), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1995—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–66 struck out subsec. (c) which directed Secretary of Energy to transmit to Congress, concurrently with submission of President's annual budget to Congress, detailed description of comprehensive plan as then in effect.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain functions from Nuclear Regulatory Commission to Chairman thereof, see Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1980, 45 F.R. 40561, 94 Stat. 3585, set out as a note under section 5841 of this title.
#### § 100.146 Limited use of privileged information.

Notwithstanding § 100.145, the self-test report or results may be obtained and used by an aggrieved person, applicant, department or agency solely to determine a penalty or remedy after the violation of the Fair Housing Act has been adjudicated or admitted. Disclosures for this limited purpose may be used only for the particular proceeding in which the adjudication or admission is made. Information disclosed under this section remains otherwise privileged under this subpart.

[62 FR 66433, Dec. 18, 1997]
### §10. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632, 645

Section, acts May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 555; Jan. 24, 1923, ch. 42, 42 Stat. 1177, related to depositary acting for commissioner as receiver of public moneys.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MALAYTHONG BUSH a/k/a

MALAYTHONG SINGH, individually

and d/b/a LUCKY PIZZA,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00454 WHA

ORDER SETTING

ASIDE SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. sued defendant Malaythong Bush for allegedly

exhibiting at a commercial establishment a pay-per-view fight telecast to which plaintiff claims

to have owned the exclusive domestic commercial exhibition rights. On May 5, 2010, plaintiff

filed a stipulation of dismissal on the grounds that the parties had settled this action (Dkt. No.

39). The order of dismissal retained the Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement until

August 1, 2010, after which the dismissal was to be deemed with prejudice.

On July 1, 2010, plaintiff filed a “motion to set aside settlement and reopen action” on

the grounds that defendants allegedly failed to honor the terms of the settlement agreement.

Defendant’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion was due on July 22, 2010, but no opposition was

received. Defendant was ordered to show cause for its failure to respond to the motion in

accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to

Case 3:09-cv-00454-WHA Document 44 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). Now defendant has filed a statement of

nonopposition to the motion to set aside dismissal and reopen the action.

The motion to set aside the dismissal is GRANTED. A further case management

conference shall be held on AUGUST 12, 2010, AT 11:00 A.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00454-WHA Document 44 Filed 08/04/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Andrew W. Pless et al., Respondents, v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Bastow, JJ.
Amendment to Confirmation of OTC Convertible Note  - Goldman, Sachs & Co.



 Exhibit 10.86 
 Goldman, Sachs & Co. 
 200 West Street 

New York, New York 10282-2198 
 Telephone
No.:    (212) 902-1000 
 August 30, 2010 

To: Gilead Sciences, Inc.  
 333 Lakeside
Drive 
 Foster City, California 94404 

			
	 Attention:
	  	 Treasurer

	 Telephone No.:
	  	 (650) 522-5727

	 Facsimile No.:
	  	 (650) 522-3000


 Re: Base Call
Option Transaction (2014) 
 Reference is made to the letter agreement Re: Base Call Option Transaction
(2014) dated July 26, 2010 and entered into between into between Goldman, Sachs & Co. (“Dealer”) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (“Counterparty”) (the “Confirmation”). Capitalized terms
used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Confirmation. 
 Whereas the
Confirmation defined the Free Convertibility Date as April 1, 2014, but Counterparty and Dealer wish to define the Free Convertibility Date as February 1, 2014; 

Now therefore, Counterparty and Dealer do hereby agree that the definition of the Free Convertibility Date in the
Confirmation is hereby replaced in its entirety by February 1, 2014. 
 [Signature Page to Follow] 







  
 
			
	 Yours faithfully,

	
	Goldman, Sachs & Co.
		
	 By:
	 	     /s/ Jonathan Lipnick

	 Name:
	 	 Jonathan Lipnick

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



 Accepted and
confirmed: 
  

			
	Gilead Sciences, Inc.
		
	 By:
	 	     /s/ Brett A. Pletcher

	 Name:
	 	 Brett A. Pletcher

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President and General Counsel
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”)
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, William M. McKay,
Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.




May 14,
2008


/s/
      William M. McKayWilliam
      M. McKayChief
      Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

PROMULGATION OF FINANCIAL 

REGULATIONS PURSUANT TO 42 

Pa.C.S. § 3502(A)

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 576

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1

st day of September, 2022, it is Ordered pursuant to Article V, 

Section 10(c) of the Constitution of Pennsylvania and Section 3502(a) of the Judicial 

Code, 42 Pa.C.S. §3502(a), that the Court Administrator of Pennsylvania is authorized to 

promulgate the attached Financial Regulations. The Financial Regulations are effective 

September 1, 2022.

To the extent that notice of proposed rulemaking may be required by Pa.R.J.A. 

103, the immediate promulgation of the regulations is hereby found to be in the interest 

of efficient administration.

This Order is to be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b) and is effective 

immediately.
§ 241.600 Title evidence. ( a ) Upon insurance of the loan, the lender shall furnish to the Commissioner a survey, satisfactory to the Commissioner, and a policy of title insurance as provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. If the lender is unable to furnish such policy for reasons satisfactory to the Commissioner, the lender shall furnish such evidence of title as provided in paragraph (a) (2), (3), or (4) of this section as the Commissioner may require. Any survey, policy of title insurance, or evidence of title required under this section shall be furnished without expense to the Commissioner. The acceptable types of title evidence are: ( 1 ) A policy of title insurance issued by a company and in a form satisfactory to the Commissioner. The policy shall name the lender and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, as their respective interests may appear, as the insured. The policy shall provide that upon acquisition of title by the lender or the Secretary, it will continue to provide the same coverage as the original policy, and will run to the lender upon its acquisition of the property in extinguishment of the debt, and to the Secretary upon acquisition of the property pursuant to the loan insurance contract.
( 2 ) An abstract of title satisfactory to the Commissioner, prepared by an abstract company or individual engaged in the business of preparing abstracts of title, accompanied by a legal opinion satisfactory to the Commissioner, as to the quality of such title, signed by an attorney at law experienced in the examination of titles.
( 3 ) A Torrens or similar title certificate.
( 4 ) Evidence of title conforming to the standards of a supervising branch of the Government of the United States of America, or of any State or territory thereof.
( b ) The survey required by paragraph (a) of this section need not be furnished in connection with a project where the loan does not exceed $200,000.
[45 FR 57983, Aug. 29, 1980, as amended at 58 FR 34217, June 24, 1993]
§ 203.410 Issue date of debentures. ( a ) *Conveyed properties, claims without conveyance, pre-foreclosure sales—* Where the property is conveyed to the Commissioner, or the mortgagee or other party acquires title to the property under the claim without conveyance procedure or the pre-foreclosure sale procedure, debenture shall be dated: ( 1 ) If issued prior to September 2, 1964, or issued on or after such date and a certificate of claim is also issued, as of one of the dates as follows: ( i ) The foreclosure proceedings were instituted;
( ii ) The property was otherwise acquired by the mortgagee after default;
( iii ) The property was acquired by the Commissioner, if directly conveyed to the Commissioner from the mortgagor; or
( iv ) The property was acquired after default by a third party under the pre-foreclosure sale procedure.
( 2 ) If issued on or after September 2, 1964, and a certificate of claim is not issued, as of the date of default as defined in this part.
( 3 ) As of the day after the date to which mortgage interest is computed as specified in § 203.402a, if the insurance settlement includes an allowance for uncollected interest in connection with a special forbearance.
( b ) *Assigned mortgages.* Where the mortgage is assigned to the Commissioner, debentures shall be dated as of the date of the assignment.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, in connection with conveyed properties and claims without conveyance, debentures issued as reimbursement for expenditures made by a mortgagee after the date of default shall be dated as of the date the expenditure is actually made by the mortgagee.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 50 FR 3892, Jan. 29, 1985; 52 FR 1329, Jan. 13, 1987; 59 FR 50145, Sept. 30, 1994; 60 FR 57678, Nov. 16, 1995]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William J. Racks, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered May 2, 1961 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted possession of narcotics as a felony, and sentencing him to serve a term of two and one-half to five years. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Ellen J. Miller, Respondent, v. Robert P. Slocum et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Stony Point, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to compel the issuance of a building permit, the town officials of the Town of Stony Point appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered November 30, 1961, which directed that the permit be issued forthwith, and which declared that “ the zoning ordinance now in effect shall not apply to prevent petitioner’s erection of the improvement in accordance with the Building Permit to be issued.” Order reversed on the law and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for determination after a hearing, with costs to abide the event. Triable issues of fact are raised by the pleadings and accompanying papers. Such issues should be determined after a hearing (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1295). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 14.315 Comments by other parties.

Any party to a proceeding other than the applicant and agency counsel may file comments on an application within 30 days after it is served, or on an answer within 15 days after it is served. A commenting party may not participate further in proceedings on the application unless the adjudicative officer determines that the public interest requires such participation in order to permit full exploration of matters raised in the comments.