alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                          
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSCEND THERAPEUTICS, INC. FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,373,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,465,137
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,465,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          818,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,220
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,587,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,465,137
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               271,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (166,808)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (166,808)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Fred Mader, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 28,281.

Indictment for conspiracy. Defendant, on severance allowed, found guilty, fined $1,000 and sentenced to a year’s imprisonment. Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. William E. Dever, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 26, 1923.

Charles E. Erbstein and John B. Fruehtl, for plaintiff in error; Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Henry T. Chace, Jr., Edward E. Wilson, Clyde C. Fisher, Assistant State’s Attorneys, and Hobart P. Young, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Harry Weinberg, Respondent, v. Louis Greiss, Appellant.

Order, entered on May 25,1961, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2609

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cloquintocet Technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cloquintocet Technical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CLOQUINTOCET TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.90.19 Cloquintocet Technical – 

Acetic acid, [5-chloro-8-quinolinyl]oxy]-, 1-methyhexyl 

ester (CAS No. 99607–70–

2) (provided for in subheading 2933.49.30) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2609 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. HYLAND’S ESTATE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 8, 1905.)

In the matter of the claim of Margaret E. Clark against the estate of John Hyland, deceased. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES RIDGWAY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WAL-MART STORES INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 08-cv-05221-SI 

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING 

SCHEDULE

On March 25, 2016, defendant filed a motion for relief from nondispositive pretrial order 

of a magistrate judge, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72-2. Docket No. 267. On March 28, 2016, 

the Court erroneously set this matter for hearing. The Court now issues this order to clarify that 

that plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion, if any, shall be filed by April 8, 2016. Any reply is due 

by April 15, 2016. The matter shall be deemed submitted on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 1, 2016

______________________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 272 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 1
Unassociated Document


    Certificate
of Approval

    


    For
Establishment of Enterprises

    with
Foreign Investment in the People’s Republic of China

    


    


    Approval
Number:  Jifuyan zi 2003 No 0058

    


    Code for
Import and Export Enterprise: 220075360027

    


    Date of
Approval: 2003

    


    Date of
Issue: September 22, 2005

    


    Certificate
Number: 2200002940

    


    Name of
Enterprise: Yanbian Huaxing Ginseng Industry Co., Ltd.

    


    Address:
Ermu County, Dunhua City, Jilin Province

    


    Type of
Business: Enterprise with Foreign Investment

    


    Duration
of Operation: 20 years

    


    Total
Investment: $364,000

    


    Registered:
$364,000

    


    Business
Scope: Ginseng Planting and Processing

    


    Name of
Investors: China Ginseng Holdings, Inc.

    


    Place of
Registration: USA

    


    Capital
Contribution: $364,000
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.88 Late charge. ( a ) The mortgage may provide for the collection by the mortgagee of a late charge in accordance with terms, conditions, and standards of the Commissioner for each dollar of each payment to interest or principal: ( 1 ) More than 10 days in arrears to cover the expense involved in handling delinquent payments;
( 2 ) For multifamily project mortgages for which HUD issued a firm commitment for mortgage insurance before September 1, 2011, and for multifamily project mortgages insured under section 232 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1715w), more than 15 days in arrears to cover the expense involved in handling delinquent payments.
( b ) Late charges shall be separately charged to and collected from the mortgagor and shall not be deducted from any aggregate monthly payment.
[76 FR 24369, May 2, 2011]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ciro Gamaliel GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-4792.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 9, 2007.

Decided: May 3, 2007.

Thomas E. Wray, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Edward A. Lustig, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ciro Gamaliel Garcia pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, 28 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), and was sentenced to 300 months in prison. He now appeals, claiming that the district court should have allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea because he allegedly did not understand the plea agreement. We affirm.

I.

Our review is for abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Ubakanma,*215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir.2000). Withdrawal of a guilty plea is not a matter of right. *Id.*The defendant bears the burden of showing a “fair and just reason” for the withdrawal of his plea. Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(d)(2)(B). “[A] ‘fair and just’ reason ... is one that essentially challenges ... the fairness of the Rule 11 proceeding.” *United States v. Lambey,*974 F.2d 1389, 1394 (4th Cir.1992) (en banc). An appropriately conducted Rule 11 proceeding, however, raises a strong presumption that the guilty plea is final and binding. *Id.*

Courts consider six factors in determining whether withdrawal of a guilty plea is proper:

> (1) whether the defendant has offered credible evidence that his plea was not knowing or otherwise involuntary; (2) whether the defendant has credibly asserted his legal innocence; (3) whether there has been a delay between entry of the plea and filing of the motion; (4) whether the defendant has had close assistance of counsel; (5) whether withdrawal will cause prejudice to the government; and (6) whether withdrawal will inconvenience the court and waste judicial resources.

*Ubakanma,*215 F.3d at 424 (quoting *United States v. Moore,*931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir.1991) (footnote omitted)).

With these factors in mind, we have reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs on appeal. We conclude that Garcia did not demonstrate a “fair and just” reason for withdrawing his guilty plea, and that there was no abuse of discretion.

II.

Accordingly, we affirm Garcia’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument be*125cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Marcia Ben Ami Michel v. Yitshaq Ben Ami.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing and for other relief granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for respondent and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in Nicaragua

On November 27, 2018, by Executive Order 13851, I declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in Nicaragua.

The situation in Nicaragua, including the violent response by the Government of Nicaragua to the protests that began on April 18, 2018, and the Ortega regime's systematic dismantling and undermining of democratic institutions and the rule of law, its use of indiscriminate violence and repressive tactics against civilians, as well as its corruption leading to the destabilization of Nicaragua's economy, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on November 27, 2018, must continue in effect beyond November 27, 2020. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13851 with respect to the situation in Nicaragua.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2020-26320

Billing code 3295-F1-P
### SUBCHAPTER I—BOULDER CANYON PROJECT ACT

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Consolidation of Certain Projects; Effect on This Subchapter

Consolidation of Parker and Davis Dam projects as not affecting this subchapter, see note preceding this subchapter.
§ 203.673 Habitability. ( a ) For purposes of § 203.670, a property is habitable if it meets the requirements of this section in its present condition, or will meet these requirements with the expenditure of not more than five percent of the fair market value of the property. The cost of hazard reduction or abatement of lead-based paint hazards in the property, as required by the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), and the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851-4856), and implementing regulations in part 35 of this title, is excluded from these repair cost limitations.
( b ) ( 1 ) Each residential unit must contain: ( i ) Heating facilities adequate for healthful and comfortable living conditions, taking into consideration the local climate;
( ii ) Adequate electrical supply for lighting and for equipment used in the residential unit;
( iii ) Adequate cooking facilities;
( iv ) A continuing supply of hot and cold water; and
( v ) Adequate sanitary facilities and a safe method of sewage disposal.
( 2 ) The property shall be structurally sound, reasonably durable, and free from hazards that may adversely affect the health and safety of the occupants or may impair the customary use and enjoyment by the occupants. Unacceptable hazards include, but are not limited to, subsidence, erosion, flood, exposure to the elements, exposed or unsafe electrical wiring, or an accumulation of minor hazards, such as broken stairs.
( c ) If repairs, including lead-based paint hazard reduction or abatement, are to be made while the property is occupied, the occupant must hold the Secretary and the Department harmless against any personal injury or property damage that may occur during the process of making repairs. If temporary relocation of the occupant is necessary during repairs, no reimbursement for relocation expenses will be provided to the occupant.
[53 FR 874, Jan. 14, 1988, as amended at 64 FR 50225, Sept. 15, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TAMARAH R. SEIELSTAD,

Plaintiff,

 v.

AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC,

Defendant /

No. C-09-1797 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH

GENERAL ORDER 45 AND THE

COURT’S STANDING ORDERS

On January 14, 2010, plaintiff electronically filed a Second Amended Class-Action

Complaint. Plaintiff has violated General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders,

however, by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day

following the day that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document

that is filed electronically . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the

judge’s name, case number, and ‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45

§ VI.G; see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to the Honorable Maxine M.

Chesney ¶ 2.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s

Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the above-referenced

document. Plaintiff is hereby advised that if she fails in the future to comply with General

Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Order to provide a chambers copy of each

Case 3:09-cv-01797-MMC Document 36 Filed 01/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to,

striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not

been timely provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01797-MMC Document 36 Filed 01/22/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF ALAMEDA, CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

NUVEEN MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME

OPPORTUNITY FUND,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-04575 SI

THIRD

PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED pursuant to F.R.C.P. and the Local Rules of this Court:

FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT: July 16, 2010 at 3:00 p.m.

Counsel must file a joint case management statement seven days in advance of the conference.

DISCOVERY PLAN: Per F.R.Civ.P and Local Rules, subject to any provisions below.

NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is September 3, 2010.

DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 9/24/10; REBUTTAL: 10/15/10. Parties SHALL conform to Rule 26(a)(2).

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF is November 12, 2010.

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS SHALL be filed by December 3, 2010; 

Opp. Due December 17, 2010; Reply Due December 23, 2010;

 and set for hearing no later than January 14, 2011 at 9:00 AM.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE: February 22, 2011 at 3:30 PM.

JURY TRIAL DATE: March 7, 2011 at 8:30 AM., Courtroom 10, 19th floor.

TRIAL LENGTH is estimated to be days.

SPECIAL DISCOVERY AND PRETRIAL PROVISIONS:

By April 16, 2010, counsel shall inform the Court of the type of ADR procedure and the date it’s

scheduled to occur. The parties have agreed to participate in an ADR process either late June 2010 or

early July 2010.

The parties have agreed to increase the number of interrogatories up to 50, 

The pretrial conference SHALL be attended by trial counsel prepared to discuss all aspects of the case,

including settlement. Parties SHALL conform to the attached instructions. Plaintiff is ORDERED to

serve a copy of this order on any party subsequently joined in this action.

Case 3:09-cv-01437-SI Document 50 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01437-SI Document 50 Filed 04/08/10 Page 2 of 2
### §9311. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1051(n), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 717

Section, Pub. L. 96–386, §12, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1544, directed Secretary of Energy to submit annual report of activities pursuant to this chapter as a separate part of the annual report submitted pursuant to section 7321 of this title.
#### § 903.8 Withdrawal.

A case may be withdrawn at any time by written notification to the Board from the party initiating the case. A case may be determined by the Board to have lapsed when the grievant fails to respond in writing to two successive written Board inquiries within any deadline fixed for such response. The Board may permit the reopening of lapsed cases upon a showing of good cause and may permit or request the views of the parties as to whether good cause has been shown.
### §1511a. Cooperation and participation by Secretary of the Army with Federal, State, and local agencies

The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized to cooperate and participate with concerned Federal, State, and local agencies in preparing the general plan for the development of the water resources of the western United States authorized by the Colorado River Basin Project Act [43 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 91–611, title II, §203, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1828.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Colorado River Basin Project Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 90–537, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 885, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Colorado River Basin Project Act which comprises this chapter.
### §5177a. Emergency grants to assist low-income migrant and seasonal farmworkers

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Agriculture may make grants to public agencies or private organizations with tax exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of title 26, that have experience in providing emergency services to low-income migrant and seasonal farmworkers where the Secretary determines that a local, State or national emergency or disaster has caused low-income migrant or seasonal farmworkers to lose income, to be unable to work, or to stay home or return home in anticipation of work shortages. Emergency services to be provided with assistance received under this section may include such types of assistance as the Secretary of Agriculture determines to be necessary and appropriate.

#### (b) "Low-income migrant or seasonal farmworker" defined

For the purposes of this section, the term "low-income migrant or seasonal farmworker" means an individual—

(1) who has, during any consecutive 12 month period within the preceding 24 month period, performed farm work for wages;

(2) who has received not less than one-half of such individual's total income, or been employed at least one-half of total work time in farm work; and

(3) whose annual family income within the 12 month period referred to in paragraph (1) does not exceed the higher of the poverty level or 70 percent of the lower living standard income level.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 101–624, title XXII, §2281, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3978; Pub. L. 107–171, title X, §10102, May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 488.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, and not as part of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–171 struck out ", not to exceed $20,000,000 annually," after "Secretary of Agriculture may make grants".