alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 241.1005 Definitions. ( a ) All of the definitions of § 241.1 apply to equity and acquisition loans insured under subpart E of this part except the following definitions: § 241.1(i)—Borrower; § 241.1(k)—Energy conserving improvements; § 241.1(1)—Solar energy system.
( b ) As used in subpart E of this part, the following terms have the meaning indicated:
*Acquisition loan* means a loan or advance of credit made to a purchaser of eligible low income housing which is made for the purpose of implementing a plan of action approved in accordance with part 248 of this chapter.
*Borrower* means the owner or qualified purchaser of an eligible low income housing project, which owner receives and becomes primarily obligated for the repayment of an equity loan. With respect to loans insured in connection with a plan of action under part 248, subpart C of this chapter, the term includes a public entity, a nonprofit organization or a limited equity cooperative, which entity is purchasing an eligible low income housing project by means of an equity loan and is obligated for the payment of the equity loan.
*Eligible low income housing* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 or § 248.201 of this chapter, with respect to loans insured in connection with plans of action under subparts B or C of part 248 of this chapter.
*Equity* means, for purpose of subparts E and F of this part only, the difference between the fair market value of the project as determined by the Commissioner and the outstanding indebtedness relating to the property.
*Equity Loan* means a loan or advance of credit to the owner of an eligible low income housing project which is made for the purpose of implementing a plan of action approved in accordance with part 248 of this chapter.
*Extension preservation equity* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 of this chapter.
*Limited equity cooperative* means a tenant cooperative corporation which, in a manner acceptable to the Commissioner, restricts the initial and resale price of the shares of stock in the cooperative corporation so that the shares remain affordable to low-income families and moderate income families.
*Low-income families* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 of this chapter.
*Moderate income families* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 of this chapter.
*Plan of action* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 or § 248.201 of this chapter.
*Preservation equity* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 of this chapter.
*Priority purchaser* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 of this chapter.
*Qualified Purchaser* has the same meaning as provided at § 248.101 of this chapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Wednesday, January 12, 2005, at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 3 p.m. During this meeting we will share information on new developments relating to the Northwest Forest Plan, learn about Hungry Hunter Stewardship Bidding results, discuss recreating planning for the Hungry Hunter area, and receive input on the White Pass Ski Area Expansion Draft Environmental Impact Statement. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-9200.

Dated: December 17, 2004.

Paul Hart,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.

[FR Doc. 04-28246  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
STEAM ELECTRIC REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE0 3528

This media is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made

as follows: In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 Washington, DC. 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744 Fax: 202-566- 9744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov

Final version of the steam electric sampling analytical database including all EPA sampling data and monitoring data used for development of the effluent limits and pollutant loadings.
Case 3:09-cv-01241-WHA Document 28 Filed 06/02/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-01241-WHA Document27 Filed06/01/10 Page1 of 2
Case3:09-cv-01241-WHA Document27 Filed06/01/10 Page2 of 2

June 2

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APPROVED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-01241-WHA Document 28 Filed 06/02/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 203.431 Sale of insured mortgage to approved mortgagee.

An insured mortgage may be sold to another approved mortgagee. The seller shall notify HUD of the sale within 15 calendar days, on a form prescribed by HUD and acknowledged by the buyer.

[45 FR 27929, Apr. 25, 1980]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 AND  STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE QUARTER
ENDING  SEPT.  30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         4,447,296
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,977
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    9,906,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,458,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          319,465
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,139,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,458,547
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,328,920
<CGS>                                          1,197,479
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,197,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               169,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (37,850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (37,850)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH SCHEINUCK, 

Plaintiff, 

 v.

CAPTAIN D. SEPULVEDA,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-0727 WHA (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

OF TIME

(Docket No. 25)

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time in which to further oppose defendant’s

motion for summary judgment, filed on February 2, 2010, in order to be able to complete

discovery. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (docket number

25) in which to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. His

opposition is due no later than June 15, 2010. Defendant shall file a reply no later than June

30, 2010. 

Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No

further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) is required before the parties

may conduct discovery. 

No further extensions of the deadlines set in this order will be granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12 , 2010 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.09\SCHEINUCK0727.EOT.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-00727-WHA Document 26 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2708 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2708

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]difuran-2,6-
                 dione, 3-phenyl-7-(4-propoxyphenyl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]difuran-2,6-
                 dione, 3-phenyl-7-(4-propoxyphenyl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZO[1,2-B:4,5-B]DIFURAN-2,6-DIONE, 3-PHENYL-7-(4-
              PROPOXYPHENYL)-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.13      Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         b]difuran-2,6-                                                     31/2008
                         dione, 3-phenyl-7-
                         (4-propoxyphenyl)-
                         . (CAS No. 79694-
                         17-0) (provided
                         for in subheading
                         3204.11.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-08-00425-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

PRENTICE WARE, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Prentice Ware, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated robbery.

The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO

right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On July 7, 2008, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification

and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right

to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant

has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any

amended certification.

On September 25, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s

response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect

or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 2 day of October, 2008. nd
Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Memorandum 

Date: 

To: 

From: 

Prepared by: 

December 23, 2009 

FAA Docket No. 16-08-12 

Anne Torgerson ,;^ l 

Deandra Brooks 

Subject: Index of Administrative Record 

On December 18, 2009, the FAA mailed the Director's Determination to all parties associated 

with FAA Docket No. 16-08-12 using the U.S. Postal Service's certified, return receipt requested 

mail service. The Index of Administrative Record was inadvertently omitted from this mailing. 

On December 22, 2009, the FAA mailed the Index of Administrative Record to all parties 

associated with FAA Docket No. 16-08-12 using the U.S. Postal Service's first class mail 

service.
### §2996g. Records and reports

#### (a) Authority to require reports

The Corporation is authorized to require such reports as it deems necessary from any grantee, contractor, or person or entity receiving financial assistance under this subchapter regarding activities carried out pursuant to this subchapter.

#### (b) Authority to require recordkeeping; access to records

The Corporation is authorized to prescribe the keeping of records with respect to funds provided by grant or contract and shall have access to such records at all reasonable times for the purpose of insuring compliance with the grant or contract or the terms and conditions upon which financial assistance was provided.

#### (c) Annual report to President and Congress; contents

The Corporation shall publish an annual report which shall be filed by the Corporation with the President and the Congress. Such report shall include a description of services provided pursuant to section 2996f(a)(2)(C)(i) and (ii) of this title.

#### (d) Copies and retention of reports

Copies of all reports pertinent to the evaluation, inspection, or monitoring of any grantee, contractor, or person or entity receiving financial assistance under this subchapter shall be submitted on a timely basis to such grantee, contractor, or person or entity, and shall be maintained in the principal office of the Corporation for a period of at least five years subsequent to such evaluation, inspection, or monitoring. Such reports shall be available for public inspection during regular business hours, and copies shall be furnished, upon request, to interested parties upon payment of such reasonable fees as the Corporation may establish.

#### (e) Publication in Federal Register of rules, regulations, guidelines and instructions

The Corporation shall afford notice and reasonable opportunity for comment to interested parties prior to issuing rules, regulations, and guidelines, and it shall publish in the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to their effective date all its rules, regulations, guidelines, and instructions.

(Pub. L. 88–452, title X, §1008, as added Pub. L. 93–355, §2, July 25, 1974, 88 Stat. 386; amended Pub. L. 95–222, §9(b)(2), Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1621.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1977—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95–222 inserted provisions setting forth required contents of annual report.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–222 effective Dec. 28, 1977, see section 17(b) of Pub. L. 95–222, set out as a note under section 2996 of this title.

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in subsec. (c) of this section relating to filing annual report with Congress, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and item 2 on page 202 of House Document No. 103–7.
First Amendment to Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Property



  
 Exhibit 10.3 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE OF PROPERTY 
 This First Amendment to Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Property (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of the 25th day of May, 2010, by and between DAKOTA HILL PROPERTIES, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (“Seller”), and
KBS REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”). 

A.        Buyer and Seller entered into that certain Agreement for Sale and Purchase of
Property dated as of the 31st day of March, 2010, (the
“Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement. Subject to the terms set forth in the Agreement, Buyer has agreed to purchase the Property from
Seller. 
 B.        Buyer and Seller desire to and hereby amend the Agreement on all of the
terms, provisions and conditions contained herein. 
 In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 

1.        Section 6.3 of the Agreement shall be amended to provide that the
Inspection Date shall be the 15th day of June, 2010. 

2.        This Amendment is integrated into and made a part of the Agreement. Except as specifically
otherwise specifically provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement, as hereby amended, are ratified and confirmed and shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict between this Amendment and
the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern and control. Seller and Buyer have obtained any and all necessary consents and/or approvals prior to executing this Amendment. This Amendment may be executed in multiple
counterparts, which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Executed counterparts of this Amendment transmitted by facsimile or email shall bind the party so signing with the same effect as though the signature were an
original signature. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written
above. 
  

					
	Seller:
	DAKOTA HILL PROPERTIES, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
	By:   DAKOTA IRET, Inc., a Texas corporation, its general partner
			
		 	By:	 	/s/ Diane K. Bryantt
		 		 	Print Name: Diane K. Bryantt
		 		 	Print Title: Vice President
			
		 	By:	 	/s/ Thomas A. Wentz, Jr.
		 		 	Print Name: Thomas A. Wentz, Jr.
		 		 	Print Title: Vice President
	
	Buyer:


					
	
	KBS REALTY ADVISORS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company


					
	
	By: /s/ Charles J. Schreiber, Jr.
	Print Name: Charles Schreiber
	Print Title: Chief Executive Officer
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Ousseynou Lam, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Matthew A. Sciarrino, J.), rendered November 2, 2011, convicting him, after a nonjury trial, of unlicensed general vending, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Matthew A. Sciarrino, J.) rendered November 2, 2011, affirmed.</p><p>The court properly exercised its discretion in its <i>Molineux</i> (<i>People v Molineux</i>, 168 NY 264 [1901]) and <i>Sandoval</i> (<i>People v Sandoval</i>, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]) rulings. The evidence at issue, defendant's four prior acts of unlicensed general vending, was relevant to defendant's motive and intent, as well as tending to dispel the notion that there was an innocent explanation for his conduct (<a href="../2003/2003_19547.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Chi Yuan Hwang</i>, 2 AD3d 245</a> [2003], <i>lv denied </i>2 NY3d 738 [2004]). The potential for prejudice did not outweigh the probative value of this evidence (<i>see People v Alvino</i>, 71 NY2d 233, 242 [1987]). In a nonjury trial, the trial court, is presumed, by virtue of learning and experience, to have considered only the competent evidence adduced in reaching its determination (<a href="../2003/2003_18872.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Torres</i>, 1 AD3d 621</a> [2003], <i>lv denied </i>1 NY3d 602 [2004]).</p><p>Defendant's conviction for unlicensed general vending (<i>see </i>Administrative Code ยง 20-453) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, which showed that defendant, without a license, engaged in the conduct required for acting as a general vendor, by standing in a Union Square crosswalk as it began to rain, "right next to" a metal pushcart upon which he arranged and displayed umbrellas (<a href="../2011/2011_52327.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Lam</i>, 34 Misc 3d 130</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52327[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2011], <i>affd. </i>21 NY3d 958 [2013]; <a href="../2012/2012_02804.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Abdurraheem</i>, 94 AD3d 569</a> [2012], <i>lv denied </i>19 NY3d 970 [2012]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur 	<br>Decision Date: January 20, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to January 11, 2022 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### A

- 21

- 207 State v. Savage

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov: http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here: http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.