alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

CHRISTINE Y. WONG (NYBN 3988607)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7301

Facsimile: (415) 436-6753

E-Mail: Christine.Wong@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JEE FONG LOW,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-0269 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

CONFERENCE

The United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, Assistant United

States Attorney CHRISTINE Y. WONG, and Defendant JEE FONG LOW, by and through his

counsel of record, GARRICK S. LEW, hereby agree and stipulate that the status conference in

this matter should be continued from March 1, 2010 to March 29, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. for the

purpose of scheduling a settlement conference in this matter. The parties request that the court

continue the pending proceedings at this time. 

With the agreement of the parties and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters

Case 3:09-cr-00269-MHP Document 48 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

this order confirming the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from March 1, 2010

through March 29, 2010. The parties agree and stipulate to the above facts, and the Court finds

and holds, as follows:

1. The ends of justice served by excluding the period from March 1, 2010 to March

29, 2010 from Speedy Trial Act calculations outweighs the interests of the public and the

defendant to a speedy trial, by ensuring the effective preparation of counsel, in accordance with

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

SO STIPULATED:

DATED: February 25, 2010 

GARRICK LEW, ESQ.

Attorney for JEE FONG LOW

DATED: February 25, 2010 /s/ 

CHRISTINE Y. WONG

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February ____, 2010 

HON. MARILYN H. PATEL

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cr-00269-MHP Document 48 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-120933) of PRA International of our report dated March 18, 2005 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders,
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
March 18, 2005 relating to the financial statement schedules,
which appears in this Form 10-K. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP McLean, Virginia
March 18, 2005
§ 1502.7 Fees. ( a ) *Authority.* USADF charges for processing FOIA requests in accordance with the Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and Guidelines of the Office of Management and Budget, 52 FR 10012-10020 (March 17, 1987).
( b ) *When charged.* Fees shall be charged in accordance with the schedules contained in paragraph (c) of this section for services rendered in responding to requests for Foundation records under this subpart. Requestors may seek a waiver of fees by submitting a written application demonstrating how disclosure of the requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial interest of the requestor. Fees shall also not be charged where they would amount, in the aggregate, for a request or series of related requests, to $25 or less.
( c ) *Services charged for and amount charged.* For the services listed below expended in locating or making available records or copies thereof, the following charges shall be assessed: ( 1 ) *Copies.* For copies, $.10 per copy of each page.
( 2 ) *Clerical searches.* For each one quarter hour spent by clerical personnel in excess of the first quarter hour in searching for and producing requested records, $4.75.
( 3 ) *Non-routine, non-clerical searches.* Where the task of determining which records fall within a request and collecting them requires the time of professional or managerial personnel, and where the time required is substantial, for each one quarter hour spent in excess of the first quarter hour, $10.00. No charge shall be made for the time spent in resolving legal or policy issues affecting access to records of known contents.
( 4 ) *Other charges.* When a response to a request requires services or materials other than those described in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section, the direct cost of such services to the Foundation may be charged, providing the requestor has been given an estimate of such cost before it is incurred.
Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA   Document 569   Filed 03/22/10   Page 1 of 1
### §7608. Mandatory licensing

Whenever the Attorney General determines, upon application of the Administrator—

(1) that—

(A) in the implementation of the requirements of section 7411, 7412, or 7521 of this title, a right under any United States letters patent, which is being used or intended for public or commercial use and not otherwise reasonably available, is necessary to enable any person required to comply with such limitation to so comply, and

(B) there are no reasonable alternative methods to accomplish such purpose, and

(2) that the unavailability of such right may result in a substantial lessening of competition or tendency to create a monopoly in any line of commerce in any section of the country,

the Attorney General may so certify to a district court of the United States, which may issue an order requiring the person who owns such patent to license it on such reasonable terms and conditions as the court, after hearing, may determine. Such certification may be made to the district court for the district in which the person owning the patent resides, does business, or is found.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §308, as added Pub. L. 91–604, §12(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1708.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1857h–6 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 308 of act July 14, 1955, was renumbered section 315 by Pub. L. 91–604 and is classified to section 7615 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Modification or Rescission of Rules, Regulations, Orders, Determinations, Contracts, Certifications, Authorizations, Delegations, and Other Actions

All rules, regulations, orders, determinations, contracts, certifications, authorizations, delegations, or other actions duly issued, made, or taken by or pursuant to act July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of Pub. L. 95–95 [Aug. 7, 1977] to continue in full force and effect until modified or rescinded in accordance with act July 14, 1955, as amended by Pub. L. 95–95 [this chapter], see section 406(b) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.
#### § 203.474 Maximum claim period.

A claim for insurance benefits on a loan secured by other than a first mortgage shall be filed within one year from the date of default, or within such additional period of time as may be approved by the Commissioner.

[49 FR 21319, May 21, 1984]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD J. MCINTOSH,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER JR.,

Defendant. /

No. 09-cv-00750 CRB

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

ENTRY OF ORDER INVOLVING

ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY

McIntosh has moved for entry of an order directing the federal government to produce

additional discovery related to his case. See Motion for Entry of Order (dkt. 178). Three

prior discovery motions remain pending, although the Court directed the parties to address

the concerns raised in those motions following a hearing on September 11, 2015, and the

parties appear to have resolved many of the disputes raised in those earlier motions. See

Motion to Compel Government Employees to Appear (dkt. 149); Motion to Compel State to

Comply (dkt. 148); Motion to Compel Federal Government to Comply (dkt. 147). 

After reviewing the arguments raised by the parties in their papers, the Court hereby

ORDERS that the United States Marshals Service shall furnish McIntosh with a declaration

describing their search for documents responsive to McIntosh’s subpoena, including a level

of detail similar to that provided by the FBI and ATF in this case. The Court further

ORDERS that the government shall file a document under seal explaining why it should not

be required to produce discovery related to a certain undercover operation in Philadelphia,

Case 3:09-cv-00750-CRB Document 187 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

given that the Court could protect discovery related to that operation with a protective order

similar to the one it entered regarding the 174 pages of FBI documents in this case. The

Court DENIES McIntosh’s remaining requests, and further DENIES McIntosh’s three prior

discovery orders as moot. See Motion to Compel Government Employees to Appear (dkt.

149); Motion to Compel State to Comply (dkt. 148); Motion to Compel Federal Government

to Comply (dkt. 147). The hearing set for November 13, 2015, is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 12, 2015 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00750-CRB Document 187 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2
### §6247a. Use of underutilized facilities

#### (a) Authority

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, the Secretary, by lease or otherwise, for any term and under such other conditions as the Secretary considers necessary or appropriate, may store in underutilized Strategic Petroleum Reserve facilities petroleum product 1 owned by a foreign government or its representative. Petroleum products stored under this section are not part of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and may be exported without license from the United States.

#### (b) Protection of facilities

All agreements entered into pursuant to subsection (a) shall contain provisions providing for fees to fully compensate the United States for all related costs of storage and removals of petroleum products (including the proportionate cost of replacement facilities necessitated as a result of any withdrawals) incurred by the United States on behalf of the foreign government or its representative.

#### (c) Access to stored oil

The Secretary shall ensure that agreements to store petroleum products for foreign governments or their representatives do not impair the ability of the United States to withdraw, distribute, or sell petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in response to an energy emergency or to the obligations of the United States under the Agreement on an International Energy Program.

#### (d) Availability of funds

Funds collected through the leasing of Strategic Petroleum Reserve facilities authorized by subsection (a) after September 30, 2007, shall be used by the Secretary of Energy without further appropriation for the purchase of petroleum products for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §168, as added Pub. L. 105–33, title IX, §9303(a), Aug. 5, 1997, 111 Stat. 676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title I of Pub. L. 94–163, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 875, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be "products".
§ 215.5 Access to requested information by individuals. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request by an individual made in accordance with the provisions of § 215.3, such individual shall be granted access to any record pertaining to him or her which is contained in a system of records maintained by the Agency subject to exemptions discussed in §§ 215.13 and 215.14.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, access will not be allowed an individual to information or records compiled by the Agency in reasonable anticipation of a civil or criminal action or proceeding.
( c ) Whenever possible, access to requested records will be granted; ( 1 ) Where the request is presented in person and the record is readily available, promptly upon receipt of the request for access, determination that access to the record may be granted, verification of the identity of the individual seeking access, and, where applicable, receipt of consent to discuss the record with a person accompanying the individual;
( 2 ) Where the request is made by mail, the record will, whenever possible, be provided within ten (10) working days of receipt of the request.
( d ) Where access to a record cannot reasonably be granted as provided in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section, the Agency will acknowledge in writing receipt of the request for access and indicate a reasonable time within which access to the record can be granted.
( e ) Where no reasonable means exist for an individual to have access to his or her record in person, a copy of the record must be provided through the mail.
#### Murugan Arumugam et al., Respondents, v David M. Smith et al., Appellants.

[716 NYS2d 518]

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Murugan Arumugam (plaintiff) when he was struck by a vehicle operated by David M. Smith (defendant) and owned by defendant Rigidized Metals Corp. Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action, alleging negligence. “Although summary judgment is a drastic remedy and there is considerable reluctance to grant it in negligence actions, the motion should be granted when there is no genuine issue to be resolved at trial” *(McGraw v Ranieri,*202 AD2d 725, 726). Plaintiffs established that the sole proximate cause of the accident was the loss of control of the vehicle by defendant resulting from his intoxication and excessive speed, and defendants failed to raise an issue of fact concerning proximate cause. Any negligence on the part of plaintiff “was not a proximate or legal cause of the plaintiffs injuries, but merely furnished the condition for the event’s occurrence” *(Zulli v Halleran,*198 AD2d 347, 348; *see also, Hallett v Akintola,*178 AD2d 744, 745).

The court also properly denied defendants’ cross motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action, alleging gross negligence, recklessness and wanton conduct by defendant and seeking punitive damages. The record raises a triable issue of fact whether defendant’s conduct was “so reckless or wantonly negligent as to be the equivalent of a conscious disregard of the rights of others” *(Rinaldo v Mashayekhi,*185 AD2d 435, 436; *see, Rahn v Carkner,*241 AD2d 585, 586). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sconiers, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hayes, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

ACADIA SENESE (CABN 251287)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone:(415) 436-6809

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Email: acadia.senese@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DAVID A. MALDONADO,

Defendant. 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No. 09-0619 EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM JUNE 25,

2010, TO JUNE 30, 2010

On June 25, 2010, the parties in this case appeared before the Honorable Edward Chen for a

status hearing. At that time, the parties stipulated that time should be excluded from the Speedy

Trial Act calculation from June 25, 2010 to June 30, 2010 for effective preparation of counsel. 

The parties represented that granting the continuance was for the reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation of defense counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See

18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). The parties 

//

//

//

//

Proposed Stipulation and Order

CR No. 09-0619 MAG 1

Case 3:09-cr-00619-EMC Document 44 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

also agreed that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweighed the best

interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

DATED: 6/25/10 ____/s/______________________

ACADIA SENESE

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 6/25/10 ___________________________

SHAWN HALBERT

Attorney for David Maldonado

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from June 25,

2010, to June 30, 2010, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ ________________________________________

THE HON. EDWARD CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge 

Proposed Stipulation and Order

CR No. 09-0619 MAG 2

Case 3:09-cr-00619-EMC Document 44 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 4.2**

 
| UNION      |   |                        |
|------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| BANK OF    |   |                        |
| CALIFORNIA |   | **ENERGY CAPITAL SERVICES** |

 

June 8, 2004

 

Edge Petroleum Corporation

Edge Petroleum Exploration Company

Edge Petroleum Operating Company, Inc.

Miller Oil Company

Miller Exploration Company

1301 Travis, Suite 2000

Houston, Texas 77002

Attention: Mr. Mike Long

 

Gentlemen:

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Third Amended and RestatedCredit Agreement in the amount of up to $100.0 million by and among EdgePetroleum Corporation, Edge Petroleum Exploration Company, Edge PetroleumOperating Company, Inc., Miller Oil Company and Miller Exploration Company asBorrowers and Union Bank of California, N.A. and BNP Paribas as Lenders datedas of December 31, 2003 (the “Credit Agreement”).  All capitalized terms herein shall have themeaning assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement unless otherwise definedherein.

 

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the Agent and RequiredLenders have redetermined the Borrowing Base pursuant to Section 2.10 ofthe Credit Agreement.  Effectiveimmediately upon your execution of a counterpart of this letter and the returnthereof to the Agent as well as upon payment of all fees due, the BorrowingBase shall be in the amount of $45.0 million and shall be effective until thenext redetermination thereof pursuant to Section 2.10 of the CreditAgreement.

 

All other terms and conditions contained in the Credit Agreement remainunchanged and in full force and effect.

 

If you are in agreement with the forgoing please evidence youragreement by executing this letter in the space provided and returning onefully-executed counterpart to the undersigned.

 

Sincerely,

 

 
| /s/ Damien G. Meiburger |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Damien G. Meiburger     |
| Senior Vice President   |

 

ACCEPTED and AGREED

This 8 day of June, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Michael G. Long                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Authorized Officer on behalf of Borrowers |

 

 

4200 LINCOLN PLAZA, 500 NORTH AKARD, DALLAS, TEXAS 75201

 

----
Case 3:08-cv-05175-EMC   Document 70   Filed 05/11/10   Page 1 of 3

Case 3:08-cv-05175-EMC   Document 70   Filed 05/11/10   Page 2 of 3

Case 3:08-cv-05175-EMC   Document 70   Filed 05/11/10   Page 3 of 3
### §3797u–6. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797u–6 was editorially reclassified as section 10617 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 2002.3 OIG's overall policy concerning disclosable records. ( a ) The OIG will administer its FOIA program with a presumption of openness. This policy does not create any right enforceable in court. The OIG will fully and responsibly disclose its identifiable records and information consistent with competing public interests, such as national security, personal privacy, grand jury and investigative secrecy, complainant confidentiality, and agency deliberative process, as are recognized by FOIA and other Federal statutes. The OIG will apply the FOIA exemptions if release could foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption. Release of records will be made as promptly as possible.
( b ) The OIG FOIA Public Liaison is the Deputy Counsel to the Inspector General. Requesters who have questions or comments concerning their FOIA request may contact the FOIA Public Liaison at 202-708-1613, or through the FOIA email at *FOIARequests@hudoig.gov .*
Exhibit 10.1



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 SCHEDULE OF BASE SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

approved August 20, 2010 and retroactive to June 1, 2010 

 

					
	 Name
	  	Base Salary	 
		
	 Alan I. Kirshner
	  	$	650,000	  
	 Steven A. Markel
	  	 	600,000	  
	 Anthony F. Markel
	  	 	150,000	  
	 F. Michael Crowley
	  	 	550,000	  
	 Thomas S. Gayner
	  	 	550,000	  
	 Richard R. Whitt, III
	  	 	550,000	  
	 Gerard Albanese, Jr.
	  	 	450,000	  
	 John K. Latham
	  	 	440,000	  
	 Britton L. Glisson
	  	 	365,000	  
	 Anne G. Waleski
	  	 	290,000