alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Process Diagram for NCS

NCS refers to New Chemical Substance

All units in kg/batch

Total Charge to Reactor

272 kg Acetaldehyde

3957 kg Cuminaldehyde

27 kg NaOH

379 kg Water

30 kg Carbon Dioxide

Release Point #1 - Waste Water Treatment

481.0 kg Water

51.4 kg Sodium Salts

1.6 kg PICA

7.8 kg Cuminaldehyde

.2 kg Misc. Organics

Lights

Cut #1 Release Point #2 - Waste Water Treatment

9.8 kg Water

72.0 kg Misc. Organics

Cuminaldeyde

Cut #2 Recycle to Storage Tank

32.4 kg PICA

3203.3 kg Cuminaldehyde

Purif

Cut #3 Recycle to Distillation

.2 kg PICA

16.2 kg Cuminaldehyde

Product

Cut #4 55 Gallon Drums, ISO Containers

634.2 kg PICA

8.4 kg Misc Organics

Bottoms

Remainder Release Point #3 - On-Site Incineration

10.7 kg PICA

123.5 kg Tars

Storage Tank

Cuminaldehyde

55 Gallon Drums

5000 Gallon ISO Containers

Acetaldehyde

30,000 Gallon Rail 

Cars

Blending Tank

Batch

Reactor

Storage Tank

Reactor Crude 

Storage Tank

Batch Distillation

Blending Tank

Waste Water 

Storage Tank

NaOH,

Water

Carbon 

Dioxide

Storage Tank

Storage Tank

Storage Tank

Storage Tank

Tank Truck

Release Point #4 - Process 

Sampling

On-Site Incineration

The material from process

sampling is collected and sent to 

an on-site incinerator.

Release Point #5 - Process Cleanup

Waste Water Treatment

Process cleaning is expected to occur three 

times per year for years approaching the 

maximum estimated production rate. 

Process cleaning will be performed using 

steam and hot water. Process cleaning will 

send 125kg of PICA to on-site Waste Water 

Treatment.

Release Point #6 - Filtration Wastes

Off-Site Incineration

Used sock filters are purged in-place with 

nitrogen then removed from the process and 

placed in "Chemically-Contaminated Waste" 

drums for off-site incineration. At maximum 

production this will occur six times per year 

and contain approximately 0.7 kg of PICA per 

instance for a total of 4 kg per year.

Release Point #7 - Process Maintenance

Waste Water Treatment

Process maintenance activities will release 

varied amounts of PICA depending on the 

equipment involved. Equipment must be 

cleaned before maintenance activities in 

which personnel will be exposed. Cleaning 

will occur with steam and hot water and will 

typically release to Waste Water Treatment 

up to 4 kg of PICA (on average) per
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant

v.

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellee

______________________

2021

- 2305

______________________

Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in Nos. 61673 and 61675, Administrative Judge LisB. Young, Administrative Judge Owen C. Wilson, and Administrative Judge Richard Shackleford.

-------------------------------------------------

SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, Appellant

v.

NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellee

______________________

2021

- 2308

______________________ Case: 21-2305 Document: 26 Page: 1 Filed: 05/16/2022NAUSET CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. SECRETARY OF THE

ARMY 2

Appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in Nos. 61673 and 61675, Administrative Judge LisB. Young, Administrative Judge Owen C. Wilson, and Administrative Judge Richard Shackleford.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of t he Secretary of the Army ’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss her cross

- appeal, Appeal No. 2021

- 2308

, under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that Appeal No.

2021

- 2308 is dismissed. The revised official caption s are reflected above.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs as to Appeal No.

2021

- 2308.

(3) The Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of this order to the merits panel assigned to this case.

May 16 , 2022

Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE ( as to 2021

- 2308 only ):

M ay 16, 2022 Case: 21-2305 Document: 26 Page: 2 Filed: 05/16/2022
Case 3:09-cv-00390-JSW   Document 32   Filed 02/18/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:09-cv-00390-JSW   Document 32   Filed 02/18/10   Page 2 of 2
| ERNST & YOUNG Ernst & Young LLP Suite 3900 200 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, Florida 33131-5313 Phone: (305) 358-4111 www.ey.com Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants To Lennar Partners, Inc. We have examined management's assertion, included herein, that Lennar Partners, Inc. (the Company) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) during the year ended December 31, 2004. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination. Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with specified requirements. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects. **Ernst & Young LLP**March 8, 2005 A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
U. S. Department of Justice

Office of the Inspector General

Office of the Inspector General

 March 2007

A Review of the Federal Bureau of 

Investigation’s Use of Section 215 

Orders for Business Records

 UNCLASSIFIED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Messina, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant: (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered June 20, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting him of murder in the first degree while engaged in the commission of a felony, and imposing sentence of life imprisonment; and (2) from every intermediate order made in the action. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
# Compendium of Best Practices in Child Support – 2006

Listen

## IM-07-01

Publication Date:

Current as of:October 22, 2015

**INFORMATION MEMORANDUM**

**IM-07-01**

**ATTACHMENT:**Best Practices - 2006 - 9th Edition - Table of Contents	Compendium of Best Practices/Good Ideas in Child Support Enforcement - 2006 - 9th Edition

**DATE:** January 17, 2007

**TO:** ALL AGENCIES ADMINISTERING CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PLANS APPROVED UNDER TITLE IV-D OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES

**SUBJECT:** Compendium of Promising Practices/Good Ideas in Child Support Enforcement - 2006

**BACKGROUND:** This Information Memorandum conveys the "Compendium of Promising Practices/Good Ideas in Child Support Enforcement - 2006." The Compendium is a Federal source for learning about successful child support programs and organizational practices. You may also find the compendium electronically on our internet site: Compendium of Best Practices.

We thank all agencies for contributing the practices in this edition. We look forward to your nominations for our future editions. We will consider practices which improve outcomes for customers, enhance organizational results or increase staff performance.

**Inquiries:** Sue Sosler, OCSE, Division of State, Tribal and Local Assistance, (202) 401-5561. You may also contact the CSE program specialist in your Regional Office.

Margot Bean	Commissioner	Office of Child Support Enforcement

##       Files  

                    - DOC     Best Practices 2006 Table of Contents.doc  (31.00 KB)
                    - DOC     Compendium of Best Practices in Child Support 2006.doc  (275.00 KB)

Program Office:

 Office of Child Support Services

Types:

Policy & GuidanceInformation Memorandums (IM)

Topics:

Child Support
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. Keith Kitchen, Chief Financial Officer of Intellisync Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ J. KEITH KITCHEN   
|J. Keith Kitchen       
|Chief Financial Officer



65
### §3502. Assistant Secretary for Administration; appointment and duties

There shall be in the Department of Health and Human Services an Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Administration who shall be appointed, with the approval of the President, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the classified civil service, who shall perform such duties as the Secretary shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 86–568, title II, §202, July 1, 1960, 74 Stat. 305; Pub. L. 88–426, title III, §§305(34), 307, Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 426, 432; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 623g of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 1, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### Amendments

1964—Pub. L. 88–426, §305(34), struck out provisions which prescribed compensation of Administrative Assistant Secretary.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services", "Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services", and "Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare", "Assistant Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare", and "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare", respectively, pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

"Assistant Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare for Administration" substituted for "Administrative Assistant Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 307 of Pub. L. 88–426.

#### Effective Date of 1964 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 88–426 effective on the first day of the first pay period which begins on or after July 1, 1964, except to the extent provided in section 501(c) of Pub. L. 88–426, see section 501 of Pub. L. 88–426, title V, Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 435.

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the first day of the first pay period which begins on or after July 1, 1960, see section 122 of Pub. L. 86–568.
### §4831. Use of lead-based paint

#### (a) Prohibition by Secretary of Health and Human Services in application to cooking, drinking, or eating utensils

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall take such steps and impose such conditions as may be necessary or appropriate to prohibit the application of lead-based paint to any cooking utensil, drinking utensil, or eating utensil manufactured and distributed after January 13, 1971.

#### (b) Prohibition by Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of use in residential structures constructed or rehabilitated by Federal Government or with Federal assistance

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall take steps and impose such conditions as may be necessary or appropriate to prohibit the use of lead-based paint in residential structures constructed or rehabilitated by the Federal Government, or with Federal assistance in any form after January 13, 1971.

#### (c) Prohibition by Consumer Product Safety Commission in application to toys or furniture articles

The Consumer Product Safety Commission shall take such steps and impose such conditions as may be necessary or appropriate to prohibit the application of lead-based paint to any toy or furniture article.

(Pub. L. 91–695, title IV, §401, Jan. 13, 1971, 84 Stat. 2079; Pub. L. 93–151, §5, Nov. 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 566; Pub. L. 94–317, title II, §204(b), June 23, 1976, 90 Stat. 705; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

January 13, 1971, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "the date of enactment of this Act".

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–317 amended section generally, designating existing provisions as subsec. (a), striking out requirement of consultation with Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and provisions relating to prohibition of use of lead based paint in residential structures constructed or rehabilitated by Federal Government or with Federal assistance, and adding subsecs. (b) and (c).

1973—Pub. L. 93–151 amended section generally, providing for consultation of the Secretaries, incorporating existing provisions as cl. (1), and adding cl. (2).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
### §5147. Reimbursement of Federal agencies

Federal agencies may be reimbursed for expenditures under this chapter from funds appropriated for the purposes of this chapter. Any funds received by Federal agencies as reimbursement for services or supplies furnished under the authority of this chapter shall be deposited to the credit of the appropriation or appropriations currently available for such services or supplies.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §304, formerly §307, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 149; renumbered §304, Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §105(d), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4691.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 304 of Pub. L. 93–288 was renumbered section 303 by Pub. L. 100–707 and is classified to section 5144 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          29,792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,180
<PP&E>                                          23,592
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          217,209
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           161
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,566
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,342<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,342
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,342
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<FN>
<F1>Includes Equity in Loss of affiliate of (112)
</FN>


</TABLE>
Case3:09-cv-00790-EDL Document100 Filed01/20/10 Page3 of 3

January 21, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00790-EDL Document 101 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 1
#### FURMAN v. GALANOPULO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 21, 1905.)

Landlord and Tenant—Tenancy From Tear to Year.

Where a lease of premises in the city of New York terminated on October 15th, but the tenant continued In possession with the consent of the landlord, who received the rent regularly from month to month, the lease would be deemed to be renewed from year to year upon the terms of the original lease, and could not be terminated prior to October 15th of the following year, in the absence of a new agreement or a surrender and acceptance, notwithstanding the provisions of the statute limiting the duration of indefinite tenancies in New York City until the 1st day of May next after their commencement.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 82, Cent. Dig. Landlord and , Tenant, § 378.]

*731Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District.

Action by James W. Furman against Constantine Galanopulo. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, O’GORMAN, and BLANCHARD, JJ.

Joseph A. Kent, for appellant.

Marks & Marks, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The evidence is clear that, after the expiration of the written lease, the tenant held on as tenant with the consent of the landlord, who received the rent regularly from month to month. It is perfectly well settled in this state that under such circumstances the lease is deemed to be renewed from year to year upon the same terms and conditions as were contained in the original lease. Hence when defendant continued in possession after October 15, 1903, he began another term of a year until October 15, 1904. Under such circumstances the provision of law limiting certain tenancies in this city to May 1st does not apply. Laimbeer v. Tailer (Sup.) 4 N. Y. Supp. 588, affirmed 125 N. Y. 725, 26 N. E. 756. The letter written by the landlord’s firm, erroneously stating that the term would end on May 1, 1904, did not shorten the term. It was clearly written by mistake, and was never accepted by the society represented by defendant as a cancellation of the lease. As the parties had elected to continue the tenancy beyond October 15, 1903, the law fixed the term at one year from that date, and nothing short of a new agreement or a surrender and acceptance would shorten the term. There was no evidence of either. It follows that the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SASKIA RUSSELL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C08-5651 TEH

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTALBRIEFING FROM PLAINTIFFS

The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ application for an order approving minors’

compromise and Defendants’ statement of conditional non-opposition thereto.  Plaintiffs did

not file a reply.

The Court shares Defendants’ concern that Plaintiffs’ papers list the total amount of

the settlement as $250,000 but discuss distribution of only $200,000.  If, as Defendants

surmise, the remaining $50,000 will be Plaintiff Saskia Russell’s share of the settlement

proceeds, it appears that this Court’s approval is unnecessary as to that portion because

Saskia Russell is not a minor.  Nonetheless, the record should be clear as to the distribution

of the settlement, and the Court therefore orders Plaintiffs to file a supplemental declaration

explaining the $50,000 difference on or before August 20, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:   08/17/10                                                                         THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH   Document 50   Filed 08/17/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T18:32:47-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO