alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF 

A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 3832, THE 

“STOLEN IDENTITY REFUND FRAUD PREVENTION ACT OF 2015” 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute changes the short title to the 

“Stolen Identity Refund Fraud Prevention Act of 2016.” 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute deletes sections 2, 5, 8 and 9 

from H.R. 3832 in their entirety. 

Section 4 of the Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute replaces section 6 of 

the underlying bill with a requirement that within 180 days of enactment the Secretary submit a 

feasibility study of a program under which a taxpayer who is a victim of identity theft may elect 

to prevent electronic submission of a return by or on behalf of that taxpayer rather than 

implementing such a program. 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute replaces section 8 of the bill 

with a new section 6 that requires that the Secretary, in order to help prevent identity theft, to 

make use of information gathered under the Do Not Pay initiative, established by the Secretary 

under section 5 of the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act of 2012. 

The Chairman’s amendment revises the requirement that the Secretary submit biannual 

reports on identity theft by providing that the biannual reports are due through September 30, 

2023; by deleting the proposal regarding information on multiple refunds to the same financial 

account; by adding the requirement that each report include information on both the average and 

maximum amounts of time that elapsed in the cases of victims of such fraud were resolved; by 

replacing the requirement that the report identify the need for any further legislation to protect 

taxpayer resources and information with the requirement that the report identify the need for any 

further legislation to protect taxpayer identities; and by adding a requirement that the first report 

include (1) an assessment of the agency’s progress on identity theft outreach and education to the 

private sector, State agencies, and external organizations; and (2) the results of a feasibility study 

on the costs and benefits to enhancing its taxpayer authentication approach to the electronic tax 

return filing process. 

The Chairman’s amendment also requires the Secretary to establish an information 

sharing and analysis center (“ISAC”) to facilitate sharing data and information with respect to 

identity theft, and to submit a report on the data shared and results achieved by the ISAC no later 

than one year after the ISAC is established. 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

April 27, 2016 

JCX-40-16 
2 

The proposal is estimated to have no effect on Federal fiscal year budget receipts for the 

period 2016-2026. The extent to which the proposal may increase or decrease Federal outlays 

for the same period 2016-2026 has not been estimated. In accordance with section 402 of the 

Budget Act, the Congressional Budget Office has jurisdiction to estimate the effect on direct or 

discretionary spending.
### §6801. Congressional findings and purpose

(a) The Congress finds that improvement in electric utility rate design has great potential for reducing the cost of electric utility services to consumers and current and projected shortages of capital, and for encouraging energy conservation and better use of existing electrical generating facilities.

(b) It is the purpose of this subchapter to require the Secretary to develop proposals for improvement of electric utility rate design and transmit such proposals to Congress; to fund electric utility rate demonstration projects; to intervene or participate, upon request, in the proceedings of utility regulatory commissions; and to provide financial assistance to State offices of consumer services to facilitate presentation of consumer interests before such commissions.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title II, §201, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1142; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), title VII, §§703, 707, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 606, 607.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 94–385, §1, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1125, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter, section 6327 of this title, section 1701z–8 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, sections 787 and 790 to 790h of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, amending sections 5818, 6211, 6295, 6323, 6325, and 6326 of this title and sections 757, 764, 766, 772, 774, 777 and 784 of Title 15, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 6801, 6831, and 6851 of this title, and sections 753, 757, 761, and 790 of Title 15] may be cited as the 'Energy Conservation and Production Act'."

Pub. L. 94–385, title III, §301, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1144, provided that: "This title [enacting subchapter II of this chapter] may be cited as the 'Energy Conservation Standards for New Buildings Act of 1976'."

Pub. L. 94–385, title IV, §401, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1150, provided that: "This title [enacting subchapter III of this chapter, section 6327 of this title, and section 1701z–8 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and amending sections 6323, 6325, and 6326 of this title] may be cited as the 'Energy Conservation in Existing Buildings Act of 1976'."

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary", meaning Secretary of Energy, substituted for "Federal Energy Administration" in subsec. (b) pursuant to sections 301(a), 703, and 707 of Pub. L. 95–91, which are classified to sections 7151(a), 7293, and 7297 of this title and which terminated Federal Energy Administration and transferred its functions (with certain exceptions) to Secretary of Energy.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel Cognition and Social Judgment.
    Date: January 3, 2005.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Michael Micklin, PhD, Chief, RPHB IRG, Center 
for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 3136, MSC 7759, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-1258, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e28f8b81898e8b8c8fa2819190cc8c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91fcf8f2fafdf8fffcd1f2e2e3bffff8f9bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: December 20, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-28316 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 904.3 Relationship to other remedies. ( a ) A grievant may not file a grievance with the Board if the grievant has formally requested, prior to filing a grievance, that the matter or matters which are the basis of the grievance be considered or resolved and relief provided under another provision of law, regulation, or executive order, and the matter has been carried to final decision under such provision on its merits or is still under consideration. This provision shall not apply to grievants who have filed a prohibited personnel practice charge before the Special Counsel for the Merit Systems Protection Board.
( b ) If a grievant is not prohibited from filing a grievance under paragraph (a) of this section, the grievant may file with the Board a grievance which is also eligible for consideration, resolution, and relief as a prohibited personnel practice complaint under the provisions of law relating to the Merit Systems Protection Board or Special Counsel, or under a regulation or executive order. An election of remedies under this section shall be final upon the acceptance of jurisdiction by the Board.
[50 FR 31355, Aug. 2, 1985]
#### § 1006.30 Waivers.

Upon determination of good cause, the Secretary may, subject to statutory limitations, waive any provision of this part and delegate this authority in accordance with section 106 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (42 U.S.C. 3535(q)).
Case 3:09-cv-01056-SC Document 30 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-01056-SC Document 30 Filed 02/19/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2909 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2909

    To reduce temporarily the duty on formulated product KROVAR IDF.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2005

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reduce temporarily the duty on formulated product KROVAR IDF.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORMULATED PRODUCT KROVAR I DF .

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.94      Formulated product  2.5%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         KROVAR I DF                                                        31/2008
                         containing active
                         ingredients: [5-
                         bromo-3- sec-
                         butyl-6-
                         methyluracil]
                         (a.k.a. bromacil)
                         and [3-(3,4-
                         dichlorophenyl)
                         1,1-dimethylurea]
                         (a.k.a. diuron)
                         and application
                         adjuvants. (CAS
                         Nos. 330-54-1 and
                         314-40-9)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the dateof enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

SERVICE EMPLOYEES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

SEIU UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-00404 WHA (MEJ)

ORDER RE EMAIL PRODUCTION

(DKT ## 437, 444)

On January 7, 2010, the Court held a hearing regarding individual defendants’ personal email

accounts. Upon further consideration of the dispute, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1) By January 19, 2010, all individual defendants listed in Plaintiffs’ December 30,

2009 letter (Dkt. #444) shall produce to Defendants’ counsel all emails in the

accounts listed in the December 30 letter, regardless of relevance. The time period

for production shall be up to January 28, 2009, with a reasonable start date

determined by agreement of both parties. 

2) Defendants’ counsel shall review the emails and produce to Plaintiffs all relevant

emails by January 28, 2010. Counsel shall also serve a declaration attesting under

penalty of perjury that all relevant emails have been produced in compliance with this

Order.

3) All individual defendants listed in the December 30 letter shall serve on Plaintiffs by

January 28, 2010 a declaration attesting under penalty of perjury that all emails have

been produced in compliance with this Order.

Any individual defendant that chooses not to follow the procedure detailed in this Order shall

instead provide Plaintiffs with any necessary ISP server consent forms by January 19, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 7, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 451 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1006.365 Program administration responsibilities. ( a ) *Responsibilities.* The DHHL is responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the NHHBG Program, ensuring that NHHBG funds are used in accordance with all program requirements and written agreements, and taking appropriate action when performance problems arise. The use of contractors does not relieve the DHHL of this responsibility.
( b ) *Agreements with contractors.* The DHHL may enter into agreements with private contractors selected under the provisions of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, for purposes of administering all or part of the NHHBG program for the DHHL.
[67 FR 40776, June 13, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 75945, Dec. 7, 2015]
§ 201.41 Loan servicing. ( a ) *Generally.* The lender shall service loans in accordance with accepted practices of prudent lending institutions. It shall have adequate facilities for contacting the borrower in the event of default, and shall otherwise exercise diligence in collecting the amount due. The lender shall remain responsible to the Secretary for proper collection efforts, even though actual loan servicing and collection may be performed by an agent of the lender. The lender shall have an organized means of identifying, on a periodic basis, the payment status of delinquent loans to enable collection personnel to initiate and follow-up on collection activities, and shall document its records to reflect its collection activities on delinquent loans.
( b ) *Partial payments.* The lender shall accept any partial payment (inclusive of late charges) under an executed modification agreement or an acceptable repayment plan, and either apply it to the borrower's account or hold it in a trust account pending disposition. When partial payments held for disposition aggregate a full monthly installment, they shall be applied to the borrower's account, thus advancing the date of the oldest unpaid installment. If a partial payment is received more than 60 days after the date of default and was not submitted under a repayment plan or a modification agreement, the partial payment may be returned to the borrower, with a letter of explanation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       20,212,478
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      31,481,528
<RECEIVABLES>                                  472,313
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  63,641
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                        18,114,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              50,131,913
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      528,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            528,304
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    37,505,433
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        3,810,535
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        3,810,535
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    (401,861)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      1,250,296
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   (1,186,354)
<NET-ASSETS>                                49,603,609
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                              613,170
<INTEREST-INCOME>                                    0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,015,031
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      (401,861)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     1,250,296
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (1,186,354)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        (337,919)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       (337,919)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                          698,017
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,015,031
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        49,772,569
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            13.11
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  (.11)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                            .02
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              13.02
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                    .02


</TABLE>
#### § 206.119 [Reserved]
### ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 EPA-R06-0AR-2007-0993; FRL- -' Approval and Promulgation ofImplementation Plans; New Mexico; Interstate Transport ofPollution

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).



### ACTION: Proposed rule.



### SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve this State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the New Mexico Environmental Department (NMED) for the purpose of addressing one element ofCAA section 110 (a)(2)(D)(i), which pertains to prohibiting air pollutant emissions from within New Mexico from significantly contributing to nonattainment of the ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS in any state. This SIP revision satisfies the State ofNew Mexico's obligation to submit a SIP revision that demonstrates that adequate provisions are in place to prohibit air emissions from significantly contributing to the nonattainment ofanother state's air quality through interstate transport. This rulemaking action is being taken under section 110 ofthe CAA.



### DATES: Written comments mustbe received on or before 

### [Insert date 30 days from date of publication in the Federal Register).2 ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the Addresses section ofthe direct final rule located in the rules section ofthis Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emad Shahin, Air Planning Section (6PDL), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-6717; fax number (214) 665-7263; e-mail address shahin.emad@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section ofthis Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. Ifno relevant adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. IfEPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that ifEPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section ofthis rule and ifthat provision may be severed from the remainder ofthe rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions ofthe rule that are not the subject ofan adverse comment.3

For additional information, see the direct final rule, which is located in the rules section ofthis Federal Register.

Dated: Al Armendariz Regional Administrator, Region 6