alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9859e. Use of funds

#### (a) In general

A State that receives an allotment under section 9859c of this title shall use the funds made available through the allotment to carry out two or more activities consisting of—

(1) providing training and education to eligible child care providers on preventing injuries and illnesses in children, and promoting health-related practices;

(2) strengthening licensing, regulation, or registration standards for eligible child care providers;

(3) assisting eligible child care providers in meeting licensing, regulation, or registration standards, including rehabilitating the facilities of the providers, in order to bring the facilities into compliance with the standards;

(4) enforcing licensing, regulation, or registration standards for eligible child care providers, including holding increased unannounced inspections of the facilities of those providers;

(5) providing health consultants to provide advice to eligible child care providers;

(6) assisting eligible child care providers in enhancing the ability of the providers to serve children with disabilities and infants and toddlers with disabilities;

(7) conducting criminal background checks for eligible child care providers and other individuals who have contact with children in the facilities of the providers;

(8) providing information to parents on what factors to consider in choosing a safe and healthy child care setting; or

(9) assisting in improving the safety of transportation practices for children enrolled in child care programs with eligible child care providers.

#### (b) Supplement, not supplant

Funds appropriated pursuant to the authority of this subchapter shall be used to supplement and not supplant other Federal, State, and local public funds expended to provide services for eligible individuals.

(Pub. L. 106–310, div. A, title XIV, §1406, Oct. 17, 2000, 114 Stat. 1145.)
§ 241.4 Guarantee eligibility. ( a ) Eligible Notes only are guaranteed hereunder. Notes in order to achieve Eligible Note status: ( 1 ) Must be signed on behalf of the Borrower, manually or in facsimile, by a duly authorized representative of the Borrower;
( 2 ) Must contain a certificate of authentication manually executed by the Fiscal Agent whose appointment by the Borrower is consented to by USAID in the Fiscal Agency Agreement; and
( 3 ) Shall be approved and authenticated by USAID by either: ( i ) The affixing by USAID on the Notes of a guarantee legend incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID; or
( ii ) The delivery by USAID to the Fiscal Agent of a guarantee certificate incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID.
( b ) The authorized USAID representatives for purposes of the regulations in this part whose signature(s) shall be binding on USAID shall include the USAID Chief and Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Administrator and Deputy, Bureau for the Middle East, Mission Director and Acting Mission Director for USAID/Iraq, and such other individual(s) designated in a certificate executed by an authorized USAID Representative and delivered to the Fiscal Agent. The certificate of authentication of the Fiscal Agent issued pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall, when manually executed by the Fiscal Agent, be conclusive evidence binding on USAID that an Eligible Note has been duly executed on behalf of the Borrower and delivered.
§ 203.479 Debenture interest rate. ( a ) Debentures shall bear interest from the date of issue, payable semiannually on the first day of January and on the first day of July every year at the rate in effect as of the date the commitment was issued, or as of the date the loan was endorsed for insurance, whichever rate is higher. The applicable rates of interest will be published twice each year as a notice in the Federal Register.
( b ) For mortgages endorsed for insurance after January 23, 2004, if an insurance claim is paid in cash, the debenture interest rate for purposes of calculating such a claim shall be the monthly average yield, for the month in which the default on the mortgage occurred, on United States Treasury Securities adjusted to a constant maturity of 10 years.
[71 FR 35994, June 22, 2006]
- 1 - PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

GRANTING LEAVE TO PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE AMENDED OPPOSITION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEPHENSON, ACQUISTO & COLMAN 

JOY Y. STEPHENSON, ESQ. (SBN 113755) 

BARRY SULLIVAN, ESQ. (SBN 136571) 

RICHARD A. LOVICH, ESQ. (SBN 113472) 

OLIVER TOMAS, ESQ. (SBN 233807) 

303 N. Glenoaks Blvd., Suite 700 

Burbank, CA 91502 

Telephone: (818) 559-4477 

Facsimile: (818) 559-5484 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE HOSPITAL COMMITTEE FOR 

THE LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON 

AREAS d.b.a. VALLEYCARE 

HEALTH SYSTEM and also as 

VALLEYCARE MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL, a California non-profit, 

public benefit corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, as Secretary 

of the United States Department of 

Health and Human Services, 

Defendant. 

Case No.: CV091786-EMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON 

STIPULATION GRANTING LEAVE 

TO PLAINTIFF TO FILE ITS 

AMENDED MEMORANDUM IN 

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND REPLY IN 

SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

JUDGE: HON: EDWARD M. CHEN 

COURTROOM: C 

Case 3:09-cv-01786-EMC Document 38 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION

GRANTING LEAVE TO PLAINTIFF TO 

FILE AMENDED OPPOSITION 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

 1. Plaintiff is granted leave to file its Amended Memorandum in 

Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of 

Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; 

 2. Plaintiff’s Amended Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's 

Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for 

Summary Judgment shall be subject to Civil L.R. 7-4(b); 

 3. Plaintiff’s Amended Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's 

Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for 

Summary Judgment shall be filed no later than January 29, 2010. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATE:______________ ____________________________________ 

 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:09-cv-01786-EMC Document 38 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2894

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postcoln Birthplace Post Office Building’’. in Hodgenville, Kentucky, as the ‘‘Abraham Lin- al Service located at 102 South Walters Avenue 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2894

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, 

Kentucky, as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2

•HR 2894 EH 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo3 cated at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Ken4 tucky, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Abraham 

5 Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

9 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

10 to the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Build11 ing’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2005. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Royce Alfred Perry.

Order of substitution of attorneys entered. (Edward J. Madden, Esq., for John McCormack, Esq.)
### SUBCHAPTER IV—TIMBER CULTURE
ex10_3.htm








Exhibit 10.3



 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


DYNEGY INC. RESTORATION PENSION PLAN












WHEREAS, Dynegy Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Dynegy Inc. Restoration Pension Plan (the “Plan”);







WHEREAS, Section 8.1(a) of the Plan provides that the Dynegy Inc. Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”) has the authority to amend the Plan if it does not have a significant cost impact on the Company; and







WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to clarify treatment of the compensation component of the benefit calculation for DRP Participants under the Plan;







NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of June 1, 2008:







1.             Section 2.5 of the Plan shall be deleted, and the following Section 2.5 shall be substituted therefor:







“2.5           ‘Average Monthly Compensation’ means a DRP Participant’s average monthly compensation determined under the Qualified Plan for employment after December 31, 2007, without regard to the Compensation Limit reduced by such DRP Participant’s average monthly compensation determined under the Qualified Plan for employment after December 31, 2007, applying the Compensation Limit.”







2.             Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings attributed to such terms in the Plan.








3.             As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused these presents to be executed this 2nd day of July 2010.













	  	
DYNEGY INC.


	  	  	  	 
	  	
By:   

	
/s/ Julis Cox

	 
	  	  	
Julius Cox,

	 
	  	  	
Chairman of Benefit Plans Committee and VP of HR
#### Victor S. Levy v. Howard Reilly.

Motion for leave to dispense with printing denied without prejudice, however, to a renewal thereof upon proper papers. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: J.T. VAUGHN ENTERPRISES,

INC. (INCORRECTLY NAMED AS J.T.

VAUGHN CONSTRUCTION, LLC) AND

CAPFORM, INC.

,

Relators

.

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 14

- 00168

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Real Party in Interest ’ s third motion for extension of time within

which to file the response until September 4

, 2 014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REAL PARTY IN INTEREST ’ S RESPONSE TO

RELATOR S ’ PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS

COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Alejandro Acosta III , the Real Party in Interest ’ s

Attorney, prepare the response and forward the same to this Court on or before September 4, 2014

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 22 nd day of August , 20 14

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
### SERVED: APRlL 2, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF



### JOHN CROFT FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS FAA-2012-0903 

### ZDJJ



### ORDER GRANTING COMPLAINANT'S MOTIONS AND LIMITING HEARING TO PENALTY Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") onFebruary 19, 2013 had filed Motions asking that the allegations ofits Complaintbe deemed admitted and sought a decision in its favor as a matter oflaw because Respondent John Croft ("Respondent" or "Mr. Croft") had not answered the Complaint. Respondent had neither demonstrated good cause for failure to file an answer nor had sought an extension oftime inwhich to do so. The agency's Rules ofPractice state that a person's failure to file an Answerwithout good cause shall be deemed an admission ofthe truth ofeach allegation ofthe Complaint. 14 C.P.R. §l3.209(f). The Motions also requested that the hearing inthis matter be limitedto the issue ofthe appropriate civil penalty. Our Orderto Show Cause ofMarch 8, 2013 (''OSC"), issued inresponse to Complainant's Motions, directed Mr. Croftto answerthe OSC and to answer the Complaintby March 22, 2013 orrisk the sanctions detailed therein.

### 2 

### Mr. Croft has failed to answer the Order to Show Cause. WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Complainant's Motions to Deem Admitted Each Allegation in the Complaint, and for a Decision as to the Violations, are GRANTED; 2. Respondent John Croft is found in violation of 49 C.F.R. §§ 

### 172.2(e), 172.200(a), 172.202(a)(l), 172.202(a)(2), 172.202(a)(3), l72.202(a)(4), 172.202(a)(5), 172.203(f), 172.204(a), 172.204(c)(2), 172.204(c)(3), 172.300/172.30l(a), 172.604(a), and 173.27(b)(l); and 3. The hearing in FDMS FAA-2012-0903 will be limited to the issue ofthe appropriate civil penalty to be assessed.

# ~

# c/GJL:__fi& iCiliU:(lC:O:(wdwin Attachment

- Service List U.S. Administrative LawJudge, m 3

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1



### John Croft, Respondent 

### 134 Lincoln Street Sitka, AK 99835 TEL: 907-738-1256 ONE COPY



### Howard 

### L. Martin, Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

### Regional Counsel, Office ofRegional Counsel, AAL-7 Alaskan Region Federal Aviation Administration 222 West 7th Avenue , Box14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5273 FAX: 907- 271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 StaffAssistant 202-366-5121 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0903 (Civil Penalty Action)

· 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 191.2 Application for determination of eligibility. ( a ) Any person who believes that they or other persons known to them are either hostages as defined in the Act, or members of the family or household of hostages as defined in § 191.3(a)(1), or a child eligible for benefits under subpart D, may apply for benefits under this subchapter for themselves, or on behalf of others entitled thereto.
( b ) The application shall be in writing, should contain all identifying and other pertinent data available to the person applying about the person or persons claimed to be eligible, and should be addressed to the Assistant Secretary of State for Administration, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. Applications may be filed at any time after publication of a declaration under § 191.1(a) in the Federal Register, and during the period of its validity, or within 60 days after release from captivity. Later filing may be considered when in the opinion of the Secretary of State there is good cause for the late filing.
#### § 203.342 Mortgage modification.

If a mortgage is recast pursuant to § 203.616, the principal amount of the mortgage, as modified, shall be considered to be the “original principal balance of the mortgage” as that term is used in § 203.401.

[62 FR 60129, Nov. 6, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service 

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), approved a petition for trade adjustment assistance (TAA) that was filed on November 18, 2004, by the Louisiana Shrimp Association, Grand Isle, Louisiana. The certification date is January 10, 2005. Beginning on this date, shrimpers who land their catch in Louisiana will be eligible to apply for fiscal year 2005 benefits during an application period ending April 11, 2005. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Upon investigation, the Administrator determined that increased imports of farmed shrimp contributed importantly to a decline in the landed prices of shrimp in Louisiana by 27.5 percent during January 2003 through December 2003, when compared with the previous 5-year average. 

Eligible producers must apply to the Farm Service Agency for benefits. After submitting completed applications, producers shall receive technical assistance provided by the Extension Service at no cost and may receive an adjustment assistance payment, if certain program criteria are satisfied. Applicants must obtain the technical assistance from the Extension Service by July 11, 2005, in order to be eligible for financial payments. 

Producers of raw agricultural commodities wishing to learn more about TAA and how they may apply should contact the Department of Agriculture at the addresses provided below for General Information. 

*Producers Certified as Eligible for TAA, Contact:*                     Farm Service Agency service centers in Louisiana.                 

*For General Information About TAA, Contact:*                     Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, email:                     *trade.adjustment@fas.usda.gov.*

Dated: December 15, 2004. 

A. Ellen Terpstra, 

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-28277 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
Order entered November 30, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01299-CR

JEREMY LEONARD MAYS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F06-71504-H

ORDER

Appellant’s original appeal from his conviction was dismissed for want of jurisdiction 

because his notice of appeal was untimely. Mays v. State, No. 05-08-00891-CR (Tex. App.––

Dallas July 11, 2008, no pet.). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted appellant an outof-time appeal on March 18, 2015. In accordance with that court’s order, appellant’s notice of 

appeal was due by May 13, 2015. The notice of appeal filed with this Court was file-stamped 

July 9, 2015. Therefore, we sent the parties a letter asking them to brief our jurisdiction over the 

appeal.

In response, both appellant and the State assert the trial court conducted a hearing 

regarding the matter of the timeliness of appellant’s notice of appeal. Appellant states that on 

April 28, 2015, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals received a pro se notice of appeal and 

motion for appointment of counsel bearing cause no. 06-71504. On May 1, 2015, a notice of 

appeal was filed with the Criminal District Court No. 1. That notice of appeal bore the trial court 

number for this case, but had a W (for writ) rather than an F as the initial letter in the case umber 
sequence. The State agrees that appellant had the correct trial court number on his notice of 

appeal it and that it was filed within thirty days of April 13, 2015. The State also agrees that 

appellant should not be penalized for inadvertently using the W rather than F on the notice of 

appeal.

Based on these assertions, it appears we have jurisdiction over the appeal. However, the 

record of the hearing conducted by the trial court has not been filed with this Court. Nor has this

Court received a supplemental clerk’s records containing the documents presented at the hearing. 

We ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that 

accurately reflects the trial court proceedings.

Accordingly, we ORDER Crystal Jones, official court reporter of the Criminal District 

Court, to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, the reporter’s record, including 

all exhibits, of the November 9, 2015 hearing conducted regarding the notice of appeal.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing all of the items designated in appellant’s 

November 4, 2015 motion to supplement the record.

After the Court has received the record of the hearing and the related documents, the 

Court will set the deadline for the reporter’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Robert Burns, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court; Crystal Jones, official court reporter, Criminal District 

Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
### §8284. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–412, title II, §201(a), Aug. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 943

Section, Pub. L. 95–619, title VII, §741, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §565, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 757, related to Federal standby authority to promulgate plans.
SCHEDULE
                  CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS

      The  following  executive officers  executed  a  Change  of
Control  Severance  Agreement  substantially  identical  to   the
agreement  with Mr. Zebeck filed herewith except that instead  of
three  times  the  compensation set forth in Section  5.1(d)  the
multiplier is as set forth below and that the number of years for
which Section 9.3 applies is as set forth below:

                                                 Number for
      Officer          Date of Agreement     Section 5.1(d) and
                                                   9.3(b)
Z. Jill Barclift            4/30/98                  Two
Joseph Hoffman              4/21/98                  Two
Patrick Fox                 4/21/98                  Two
Douglas Scaliti             4/30/98                  Two
William Brennan             4/21/98                  Two
David Reak                  4/21/98                  Two
Douglas McCoy               4/30/98                  Two
Paul Runice                 4/21/98                  One
Jean Benson                 4/21/98                  One

jen\g:\m\metris\gencorp\misc\sched1.wpd
§ 309.18 Voluntary repayment agreements as an alternative to salary offset. ( a ) In response to a notice of intent, an employee may propose a written agreement to repay the debt as an alternative to salary offset. Any employee who wishes to repay a debt without salary offset shall submit in writing a proposed agreement to repay the debt. The proposal shall admit the existence of the debt and set forth a proposed repayment schedule. Any proposal under this paragraph must be received by the official designated in that notice within 20 calendar days after receipt of the notice of intent.
( b ) When the Peace Corps is the creditor agency, in response to a timely proposal by the debtor the agency will notify the employee whether the employee's proposed written agreement for repayment is acceptable. It is within the agency's discretion to accept a repayment agreement instead of proceeding by offset.
( c ) If the Peace Corps decides that the proposed repayment agreement is unacceptable, the employee will have 15 calendar days from the date he or she received notice of the decision to file a petition for a review.
( d ) If the Peace Corps decides that the proposed repayment agreement is acceptable, the alternative arrangement must be in writing and signed by both the employee and a designated agency official.