alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 213.266a Insurance fund obligations. A mortgage endorsed for insurance under section 213 of the Act shall be the obligation either of the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund or of the General Insurance Fund. The determination of the applicable fund shall be governed by the following: ( a ) A mortgage insured under section 213(a)(1) of the Act or under section 213(a)(3) if the project has been acquired by a cooperative corporation or under section 213 (i) or (j) shall be the obligation of the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund, where it has been insured pursuant to a commitment issued on or after August 10, 1965, or insured pursuant to a commitment issued prior to such date, and transferred to the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund.
( b ) A mortgage insured under section 213(a)(2) of the Act or under section 213(a)(3) where the project has not been acquired by a cooperative corporation shall be the obligation of the General Insurance Fund. A mortgage insured prior to August 10, 1965, or insured pursuant to a commitment issued prior to such date, where the project has not been transferred to the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund, shall also be the obligation of the General Insurance Fund.
### SUBCHAPTER II—DISPOSITION OF SUSPENDED ENTRIES AND CLAIMS; INVALID AND DEFECTIVE CLAIMS AND PATENTS THEREFOR
#### In the Matter of Diane Grosso, Respondent, v Allen Grosso, Appellant.

In a proceeding to enforce the terms of an order of support, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Orange County, dated November 9, 1977, which, after a hearing, *inter alia,*increased appellant’s weekly support obligations and terminated the requirement that he pay for his children’s clothing. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for a hearing consistent herewith. This proceeding seeks enforcement of appellant’s obligation to provide clothing for his children, which obligation was provided for in a stipulation of settlement which furnished the basis of a prior order of support. This proceeding could not be used as a vehicle for increasing appellant’s weekly support obligations. The manner in which the hearing was conducted contravened appellant’s due process rights in that it failed to adequately apprise him of the nature of the proceeding or afford him an opportunity to present evidence or cross-examine witnesses. Petitioner is free to initiate a proper proceeding for upward modification of support (see Family Ct Act, § 461) if she so chooses. Until such action is taken, the court should restrict itself to those issues which are properly before it. Latham, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
### §§7256a, 7256b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 7256a, Pub. L. 99–145, title XV, §1534, Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 774; Pub. L. 100–180, div. C, title I, §3131(a), Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1238, which related to costs not allowed under covered contracts, was renumbered section 4801 of Pub. L. 107–314, the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(k)(2)(A)–(C), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1783, and is classified to section 2781 of Title 50, War and National Defense.

Section 7256b, Pub. L. 101–189, div. C, title XXXI, §3151, Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1682, which related to the prohibition of bonuses to contractors operating defense nuclear facilities, was renumbered section 4802 of Pub. L. 107–314, the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(k)(3)(A)–(C), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1783, and is classified to section 2782 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
### §6372a. Guidelines

#### (a) Energy audits

The Secretary shall, by rule, not later than sixty days after November 9, 1978—

(1) prescribe guidelines for the conduct of the preliminary energy audits for buildings owned by units of local government and public care institutions, including a description of the type, number and distribution of preliminary energy audits of such buildings that will provide a reasonably accurate evaluation of the energy conservation needs of all such buildings in each State, and

(2) prescribe guidelines for the conduct of energy audits.

#### (b) Implementation of technical assistance programs

The Secretary shall, by rule, not later than 90 days after November 9, 1978, prescribe guidelines for State plans for the implementation of technical assistance programs for buildings owned by units of local government and public care institutions. The guidelines shall include—

(1) a description of the factors to be considered in determining which technical assistance programs will be given priority in making grants pursuant to this part, including such factors as cost, energy consumption, energy savings, and energy conservation goals;

(2) a description of the suggested criteria to be used in establishing a State program to identify persons qualified to undertake technical assistance work; and

(3) a description of the types of energy conservation measures deemed appropriate for each region of the Nation.

#### (c) Revisions

Guidelines prescribed under this part may be revised from time to time after notice and opportunity for comment.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §400B, as added Pub. L. 95–619, title III, §311(a), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3249.)
# The Effects of Gasoline Sulfur Level on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles in the In

- Use Fleet

Appendix B Emission Concentration Plots

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments.

EPA-420-D-13-003 April 2013

### Appendix B. Emission Concentration Plots

646566
#### § 2004.23 Service of subpoenas or requests.

Subpoenas or requests for official records or information or testimony must be served on the Counsel to the Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Room 8260, Washington, DC 20410-4500.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
 Under section 8521(a)(2) of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Secretary of Labor is required to issue a Schedule of Remuneration specifying the pay and allowances for each pay grade of members of the military services. The schedules are used to calculate the base period wages and benefits payable under the program of Unemployment Compensation for Ex-servicemembers (UCX Program). The revised schedule published with this Notice reflects increases in military pay and allowances, which are effective in January 2004. Accordingly, the following new Schedule of Remuneration, issued pursuant to 20 CFR 614.12(c), applies to “first claims” for UCX, which are effective beginning with the first day of the first week that begins on or after January 4, 2004. Pay grade
Monthly wage rate(1) Commissioned Officers:0-10
$15,0840-9
14,6700-8
13,5390-7
12,2830-6
10,5760-5
8,9110-4
7,5610-3
5,9660-2
4,7170-1
3,575(2) Commissioned Officers With Over 4 Years Active Duty As An Enlisted Member Or Warrant Officer:0-3E
$6,8770-2E
5,6270-1E
4,788(3) Warrant Officers:W-5
$7,838W-4
6,963W-3
5,883W-2
5,110W-1
4,249(4) Enlisted Personnel:E-9
$6,706E-8
5,577E-7
4,904E-6
4,238E-5
3,502E-4
2,888E-3
2,577E-2
2,429E-1
2,180
 The publication of this new Schedule of Remuneration does not revoke any prior schedule or change the period of time any prior schedule was in effect. Signed at Washington, DC, on February 4, 2004. Emily Stover DeRocco, Assistant Secretary of Labor.


[FR Doc. 04-2827 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
### §6991m. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator the following amounts:

(1) To carry out this subchapter (except sections 6991b(h), 6991d(c), 6991j, and 6991k of this title) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2011.

(2) From the Trust Fund—

(A) to carry out section 6991b(h) of this title (except section 6991b(h)(12) of this title) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2011;

(B) to carry out section 6991b(h)(12) of this title, $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2011;

(C) to carry out sections 6991b(i), 6991c(f), and 6991d(c) of this title $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2011; and

(D) to carry out sections 6991i, 6991j, 6991k, and 6991l of this title $55,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2011.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §9014, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title XV, §1531(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1104; amended Pub. L. 109–168, §1(a)(3), Jan. 10, 2006, 119 Stat. 3580; Pub. L. 109–432, div. A, title II, §210(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 2947; Pub. L. 109–433, §1(b), Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3196.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2006—Par. (2). Pub. L. 109–432 and Pub. L. 109–433 amended par. (2) identically, substituting "Fund" for "Fund, notwithstanding section 9508(c)(1) of title 26" in introductory provisions.

Pub. L. 109–168 substituted "2006 through 2011" for "2005 through 2009" wherever appearing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7995** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. STEVEN RAY LOVIN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 7:06

- cr - 00045

- BO

- 3 ; 7:12

- cv - 00015

- BO )

Submitted : May 20, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Steven Ray Lovin , Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III , Eric Evenson , Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Assistant United States Attorneys, J. Frank Bradsher , Joshua Bryan Royster , Seth Morgan Wood , O FFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Steven Ray Lovin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of app ealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists wou ld find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural
grou nds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and c onclude that Lovin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argum ent because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAlternate high capacity heat pipeThe performance predictions for a fifty foot heat pipe (4 foot evaporator - 46 foot condensor) are discussed. These performance predictions are supported by experimental data for a four foot heat pipe. Both heat pipes have evaporators with axial groove wick structures and condensers with powder metal external artery wick structures. The predicted performance of a rectangular axial groove/external artery heat pipe operating in space is given. Heat transport versus groove width is plotted for 100, 200 and 300 grooves in the evaporator. The curves show that maximum power is achieved for groove widths from 0.040 to 0.053 as the number of grooves varies from 300 to 100. The corresponding range of maximum power is 3150 to 2400 watts. The relationships between groove width and heat pipe evaporate diameter for 100, 200 and 300 grooves in the evaporator are given. A four foot heat pipe having a three foot condenser and one foot evaporator was built and tested. The evaporator wick structure used axial grooves with rectangular cross sections, and the condenser wick structure used powder metal with an external artery configuration. Fabrication drawings are enclosed. The predicted and measured performance for this heat pipe is shown. The agreement between predicted and measured performance is good and therefore substantiates the predicted performance for a fifty foot heat pipe.Document ID19870009347Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVoss, F. E.*(LTV Aerospace and Defense Co. Dallas, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 31, 1986Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-171970REPT-3-14000/6R-45NAS 1.26:171970Accession Number87N18780Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17327Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009347.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), I, John W. Elias, Chief Executive Officerof Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Dated:         March 16,  2005 |  /s/  John W. Elias |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                                                             | Name:                    | John W. Elias |
|                                                                             |                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 521.15 Ex Parte contacts.

No party or person (except employees of the ALJ's office) shall communicate in any way with the ALJ on any matter at issue in a case, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate. This provision does not prohibit a person or party from inquiring about the status of a case or asking routine questions concerning administrative functions or procedures.
Exhibit 11.0





ROSLYN BANCORP, INC.





STATEMENT RE:
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)


(Unaudited)





For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2002

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2001Income before extraordinary item

$
35,992

$
30,386Extraordinary item, net of tax





(1,892
)Income available to common stockholders

$
35,992

$
28,494Weighted average common shares outstanding


78,816,238


85,350,799Basic earnings per common share:Income before extraordinary item

$
0.46

$
0.35Extraordinary item, net of tax





(0.02
)Net income per common share

$
0.46

$
0.33Weighted average common shares outstanding


78,816,238


85,350,799Potential common stock due to dilutive effect of stock options


1,706,525


1,944,380Total shares for diluted earnings per share


80,522,763


87,295,179Diluted earnings per common share:Income before extraordinary item

$
0.45

$
0.35Extraordinary item, net of tax





(0.02
)Net income per common share

$
0.45

$
0.33





For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001Income before extraordinary item

$
106,317

$
85,117Extraordinary item, net of tax





(4,311
)Income available to common stockholders

$
106,317

$
80,806Weighted average common shares outstanding


79,580,337


86,562,119Basic earnings per common share:Income before extraordinary item

$
1.34

$
0.98Extraordinary item, net of tax





(0.05
)Net income per common share

$
1.34

$
0.93Weighted average common shares outstanding


79,580,337


86,562,119Potential common stock due to dilutive effect of stock options


1,785,905


1,523,326Total shares for diluted earnings per share


81,366,242


88,085,445Diluted earnings per common share:Income before extraordinary item

$
1.31

$
0.97Extraordinary item, net of tax





(0.05
)Net income per common share

$
1.31

$
0.92
#### § 518.16 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

Under the Act, any State agency or agency of a political subdivision of a State which is using appropriated Federal funds must comply with section 6002. Section 6002 requires that preference be given in procurement programs to the purchase of specific products containing recycled materials identified in guidelines developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR Parts 247-254). Accordingly, State and local institutions of higher education, hospitals, and non-profit organizations that receive direct Federal awards or other Federal funds shall give preference in their procurement programs funded with Federal funds to the purchase of recycled products pursuant to the EPA guidelines.
EXHIBIT
31.1


SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION





I,
Michael S. Wasik, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10−KSB of RoomLinX, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a−15(e) and 15d−15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.








Date:7/1/08By:
            /s/
      Michael S. WasikMichael S.
      WasikChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer