alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

     I, Frank J. Travea,  III,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Roebling Financial Corp,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over  financial  reporting  (as defined in Exchange Act Rule  13a-15(f))
that  occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent  fiscal  quarter  that has
materially  affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the issuer's
auditors and the audit  committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,  process,  summarize
and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees who have a significant  role in the issuer's  internal  control
over financial reporting.


Date:  December 22, 2005                   /s/ Frank J. Travea, III
       -----------------                   -------------------------------------
                                           Frank J. Travea, III
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6699

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

REON DEVAR MCILWAIN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00005-RLV-1)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 3, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reon Devar McIlwain, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reon Devar McIlwain appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction 

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. McIlwain, No. 5:01-cr-00005-

RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1003.702 Reduction or withdrawal of grant. ( a ) *General.* A reduction or withdrawal of a grant under paragraph (b) of this section will not be made until at least one of the corrective or remedial actions specified in § 1003.701(b) has been taken and only then if the grantee has not made an appropriate and timely response. Before making such a grant reduction or withdrawal, the grantee also shall be notified and given an opportunity within a prescribed time for an informal consultation regarding the proposed action.
( b ) *Reduction or withdrawal.* When the Area ONAP determines, on the basis of a review of the grantee's performance, that the objectives set forth in § 1003.700(a)(2) or (3) have not been met, the Area ONAP may reduce or withdraw the grant, except that funds already expended on eligible approved activities shall not be recaptured.
#### § 221.501 Eligibility requirements.

The requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 200, subpart A, apply to multifamily project mortgages insured under section 221 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715l), as amended.

[61 FR 14405, Apr. 1, 1996]
### SUBCHAPTER II—LANDS BENEATH NAVIGABLE WATERS WITHIN STATE BOUNDARIES
Exhibit 13.2



Certification by the Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



I, Jianping Xiang, Chief Financial Officer of
Huadi International Group Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | a. | the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date February 15, 2023 |                   
|---------------------- | ------------------
|                       |                   
|By:                    | /s/ Jianping Xiang
|                       | Name:             
|                       | Title:
July 09, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Withdrawal of Petition for Exemption

Reference: Comment to Docket FAA-2015-2371-0001. 14 CFR §121.629(b) – Operation in Icing Conditions

Dear Sir or Madam:

American Airlines is withdrawing our Petition for Exemption regarding 14CFR §121.629(b) – Operation in 

Icing Conditions. We will participate in the A4A exemption regarding the same topic.

Sincerely,

Captain Ron Thomas

Managing Director Flight Operation
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES

INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAL ROSELLI, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00404 WHA

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE

MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S

FEES AND COSTS

The parties have filed a stipulated motion to extend the filing dates for motions for

attorney’s fees and costs in this matter from May 24, 2010, to June 14, 2010. The parties have

not shown good cause for such an extension. The motion is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 665 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 11
                               Guitar Center, Inc.
                         Computation of income per share
                      (in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      Quarter Ended
                                                        March 31,
                                                   1999         1998
                                                 -------      -------
<S>                                              <C>          <C>
Income before cumulative effect of change
 in accounting principle                         $ 3,897      $ 4,220

Cumulative effect of change in accounting
 principle--write-off of pre-opening costs         1,074           --
                                                 -------      -------

 Net income                                        2,823        4,220
                                                 -------      -------
                                                 -------      -------

Weighted average shares outstanding
 Basic                                            20,101       19,347
                                                 -------      -------
                                                 -------      -------

 Diluted                                          20,846       20,773
                                                 -------      -------
                                                 -------      -------

Income per common share
Basic

 Income before cumulative effect of change
  in accounting principle                        $  0.19      $  0.22

 Cumulative effect of change in accounting
  priniciple--write-off of pre-opening costs       (0.05)          --
                                                 -------      -------

 Net income                                      $  0.14      $  0.22
                                                 -------      -------
                                                 -------      -------
Diluted

 Income before cumulative effect of change
  in accounting principle                        $  0.19      $  0.20

 Cumulative effect of change in accounting
  principle--write-off of pre-opening costs        (0.05)          --
                                                 -------      -------

 Net income                                      $  0.14      $  0.20
                                                 -------      -------
                                                 -------      -------

</TABLE>
#### Abraham Leichtag v. Realty Associates.

Application granted. Order signed. Present —■ Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum,. JJ.
No. 81-517 INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1982

DAN BUKVICH, KATIE J'IURFtAY and LEO JACOBSEN, Plaintiffsand Appellants,

BUTTE-SILVER BOW, a political subdivision of the Stateof Montana, and DONALD PEOPLES, etal., Defendants and Respondents.
Appeal from: DistrictCourt of the Second Judicial District, In and for theCounty of SilverBow Honorable Robert Boyd, Judge presiding. Counsel of Recprd: For Appellants: Jardine, McCarthy & Grauman, Whitehall, Montana John Jardine argued, Whitehall, Montana For Respondents: Robert McCarthy argued, County Attorney, Butte, Montana Ross P. Richardson argued, Deputy County Attorney,

Butte, Montana

Submitted: July 15, 1982 Decided: September 9, 1982 Filed: 

## ijkp 3

# I982Mr. Justice Gene B. Daly delivered the following Opinion of the Court. Thiscase centers around apay disputebetween the appellants, Dan Bukvich, the clerk of the District Court, Katie Murray, the auditor, and Leo Jacobsen, the coroner; and respondents, Butte-Silver BOW, a political subdivision of the State of Montana, Don Peoples, its chief executive, and its activecouncil of commissioners. Appellants are duly elected and qualified officials of Butte-Silver Bow. They contend that their salarieswere fixed by the passage of resolution no. 325 and not ordinance no. 134, as the respondents contend. Appellants petitioned the District Court for a 

### writof mandate

### to require the respondents topay the salariesas setout in the resolution. Respondents filed a motion 

### to dismiss and a motion to quash appellants' petition for a writof mandate. The District Court granted both motions and thisappeal ensued. The sole issue here is whether the District Court erred in granting respondents' motion to dismiss and motion to quash appellants' petition for a 

### writof mandate. This Court is unable 

### to make any determination on this issue at this time because the record on appeal is incomplete. The resolution is a key in this situation and in looking at the record 

### we are unable to tell what was contained in it 

### or how it
was passed. Without this information, it is impossible for us to render a decision. We, therefore, order that the lower court proceedings be vacated and thata hearing be held to determineexactlywhat this so-called resolution is and the manner in which it was passed.This case isremanded forfurtherproceedings tobe conducted inaccordwith thisopinion.

Weconcur: 

# PA&$.y,& Chief Justice
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2805 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording 

and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and 

Health Act of 1970. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPA4 TIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall 

7 revise the regulations in part 1904 of title 29, Code of 

8 Federal Regulations, concerning the recording and report-
2 

•HR 2805 IH 

1 ing of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occu2 pational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 

3 et seq.), to require site-controlling employers to keep a site 

4 log for all recordable injuries and illnesses occurring 

5 among all employees on the particular site, whether such 

6 employees are employed directly by the site-controlling em7 ployer or are employed by contractors or temporary help 

8 or employee leasing services. 

9 (b) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 

10 ‘‘site-controlling employer’’ means the employer that has 

11 primary control over the work on a particular work site 

12 and supervises the employees on a day-to-day basis on a 

13 particular work site. 

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 4, 2017

No. 04-17-00709-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.M., A CHILD,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-02894

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on November 27, 2017. Neither the brief nor a motion for 

extension of time has been filed. Furthermore, on November 13, 2017, this court ordered 

appellant to file the docketing statement for this appeal by November 27, 2017. Neither the 

docketing statement nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. 

We order Manuel Rodriguez, appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney, to file 

appellant’s brief and the docketing statement by December 14, 2017. Appellant is advised that 

no extensions of time will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. The 

court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance. If 

the brief and the docketing statement are not filed by the date ordered, the court may abate the 

appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or 

counsel has abandoned this appeal. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.013(a)(1) (giving indigent 

persons a right to counsel in parental-rights termination cases); In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 

(Tex. 2003) (holding that this right to counsel includes the right to effective counsel).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### §7385s–11. Coordination of benefits with respect to State workers compensation

#### (a) In general

An individual who has been awarded compensation under this part, and who has also received benefits from a State workers compensation system by reason of the same covered illness, shall receive compensation specified in this part reduced by the amount of any workers compensation benefits, other than medical benefits and benefits for vocational rehabilitation, that the individual has received under the State workers compensation system by reason of the covered illness, after deducting the reasonable costs, as determined by the Secretary, of obtaining those benefits under the State workers compensation system.

#### (b) Waiver

The Secretary may waive the provisions of subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that the administrative costs and burdens of implementing subsection (a) with respect to a particular case or class of cases justifies such a waiver.

#### (c) Information

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, each State workers compensation authority shall, upon request of the Secretary, provide to the Secretary on a quarterly basis information concerning workers compensation benefits received by any covered DOE contractor employee entitled to compensation or benefits under this part, which shall include the name, Social Security number, and nature and amount of workers compensation benefits for each such employee for which the request was made.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3682], as added Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3161, Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2184.)
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2501 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-imethyl-, (2-methyl(1,1′-biphenyl)-3- 

yl)methyl ester, (z)-. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclopropanecarboxylic 

acid, 3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-imethyl-, 

(2-methyl(1,1′-biphenyl)-3-yl)methyl ester, (z)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLIC ACID, 3-(2- 

4 CHLORO-3,3,3-TRIFLUORO-1-PROPENYL)-2,2- 

5 IMETHYL-, (2-METHYL(1,1′-BIPHENYL)-3- 

6 YL)METHYL ESTER, (Z)-. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
2 

•HR 2501 IH 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.08.11 Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 

3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1- 

propenyl)-2,2-imethyl-, (2- 

methyl(1,1′-biphenyl)-3- 

yl)methyl ester, (z)- (CAS 

No. 82657–04–3) (provided 

in subheading 3808.10.25) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc.
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, David D.
Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ David D. Wesselink
----------------------
David D. Wesselink
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         17,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,889
<CGS>                                           13,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>