alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2849 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2849

       To extend the suspension of duty on preparations based on 
       ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(4-isodecylphenyl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2005

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the suspension of duty on preparations based on 
       ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(4-isodecylphenyl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREPARATIONS BASED ON ETHANEDIAMIDE, N-(2-ETHOXYPHENYL)-N'-
              (4-ISODECYLPHENYL)-.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.05 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to preparations based on 
ethanediamide, N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(4-isodecylphenyl)-) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, December 10, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via teleconference.

# STATUS: 

The meeting will be open to public observation by teleconference only.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Review of EXIM's Medium- and Long-Term (MLT) Reachback Policy

2. Local Cost Support for Short Term (ST) Insurance and Working Capital Transactions

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via audio only teleconference should register via                         *https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/​register/​7605082646858648589*                         by noon Wednesday, December 9, 2020. Individuals will be directed to a Webinar registration page and provided call-in information.                    

Joyce B. Stone,

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-26136 Filed 11-20-20; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Chadwick S. Parson, certify that:

 

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual            report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

 

4.         I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under            that agreement.

 

5.         The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar            procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, that is included in these reports.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association.

 

|   | By: | /s/ Chadwick S. Parson   |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------|

|   | Name:   | Chadwick S. Parson |
|--------|-------------------|--------------------|

|   | Title:   | Managing Director and President |
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------------|

Structured Obligations Corporation

Date: March 19, 2009

 

 

 

----
§ 134.4 Eligibility of applicants. ( a ) To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a party to the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term “party” is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show by clear and convincing evidence that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in subpart B and must submit additional information to verify its eligibility upon order by the adjudicative officer.
( b ) The types of eligible applicants are as follows: ( 1 ) An individual with a net worth of not more than $1 million;
( 2 ) The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than $5 million, including both personal and business interests, and not more than 500 employees;
( 3 ) A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
( 4 ) A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees; and
( 5 ) Any other partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than $5 million and not more than 500 employees.
( c ) For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the proceeding was initiated.
( d ) An applicant who owns an unincorporated business will be considered as an “individual” rather than a “sole owner of an unincorporated business” if the issues on which the applicant prevails are related primarily to personal interests rather than to business interests.
( e ) The employees of an applicant include all persons who regularly perform services for remuneration for the applicant, under the applicant's direction and control. Part-time employees shall be included on a proportional basis.
( f ) The net worth and number of employees of the applicant and all of its affiliates shall be aggregated to determine eligibility. Any individual, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant, or any corporation or other entity of which the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares or other interest, will be considered an affiliate for purposes of this part, unless the adjudicative officer determines that such treatment would be unjust and contrary to the purposes of the Act in light of the actual relationship between the affiliated entities. In addition, the adjudicative officer may determine that financial relationships of the applicant other than those described in this paragraph constitute special circumstances that would make an award unjust.
( g ) An applicant that participates in a proceeding primarily on behalf of one or more other persons or entities that would be ineligible is not itself eligible for an award.
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. C 08-5708 JCS

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223 

PATRICIA A. DAVIS, Bar No. 179074 

CONCEPCIÓN E. LOZANO-BATISTA, Bar No.227227 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200 

Alameda, California 94501-1091 

Telephone: 510.337.1001 

Fax: 510.337.1023 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their 

capacities as Trustees of the LABORERS 

HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND 

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; 

LABORERS VACATION-HOLIDAY TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; 

LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR 

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA; and LABORERS 

TRAINING AND RETRAINING TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

GREGORY W. TERRY, Individually; 

GREGORY W. TERRY, Individually and doing 

business as AUBURN GARDENING & 

LANDSCAPE; AUBURN GARDENING & 

LANDSCAPE, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 08 5708 JCS 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:08-cv-05708-JCS Document 36 Filed 07/22/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-05708-JCS Document35 Filed07/21/10 Page1 of 2
 - 2 - 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case No. C 08-5708 JCS

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

1001 Marina Village Parkway 

Suite 200 

Alameda, CA 94501-1091 

510.337.1001

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The undersigned parties, having reached a settlement in the above- referenced case, 

stipulated that the above-entitled matter be dismissed without prejudice. Since that time, 

Defendants have met all the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, 

Plaintiffs request that the Court enter a dismissal with prejudice in this case. 

Dated: July 21, 2010. 

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD 

A Professional Corporation 

__ /s/ Conchita Lozano-Batista 

CONCHITA E. LOZANO-BATISTA 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

119698/540767 

Case3:08-cv-05708-JCS Document35 Filed07/21/10 Page2 of 2

Dated: July 22, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-05708-JCS Document 36 Filed 07/22/10 Page 2 of 2
### SUBCHAPTER XLVIII—SOUTHERN NEVADA PROJECT, NEVADA
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.6 Employer identification and social security numbers.

The requirements set forth in 24 CFR part 5, regarding the disclosure and verification of social security numbers and employer identification numbers by applicants and participants in assisted mortgage and loan insurance and related programs, apply to these programs.
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 29 Filed 01/19/10 Page 7 of 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR RESTITUTION, REQUEST TO VACATE

HEARING DATE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SAME

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

MATTHEW L. McCARTHY (CABN 217871)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: Matthew.McCarthy@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRIAN DAUM,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-0559 WHA

(1) NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF

REQUEST FOR RESTITUTION;

(2) REQUEST TO VACATE HEARING

DATE; AND

(3) [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING

HEARING DATE

Case 3:09-cr-00559-WHA Document 43 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

At the sentencing hearing of the above-captioned matter, the Court set a restitution hearing

for March 23, 2010. The government contacted counsel for the victim and informed him of the

Court’s briefing and hearing schedule. After further discussion, counsel for the victim asked the

government to inform the Court that the victim wishes to withdraw her request for restitution. 

Accordingly, the government now requests that the Court vacate the restitution hearing

presently set for March 23, 2010. 

DATED: March 16, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

_________ _/s/___________

MATTHEW L. McCARTHY 

Assistant United States Attorney 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

In light of the victim’s withdrawal of her request for restitution, the restitution hearing set for

March 23, 2010 is VACATED. 

Date: _________________________________

HON. WILLIAM H. ALSUP

United States District Court Judge

March 18, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cr-00559-WHA Document 43 Filed 03/18/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 1000.534 What constitutes substantial noncompliance? HUD will review the circumstances of each noncompliance with NAHASDA and the regulations on a case-by-case basis to determine if the noncompliance is substantial. This review is a two step process. First, there must be a noncompliance with NAHASDA or these regulations. Second, the noncompliance must be substantial. A noncompliance is substantial if: ( a ) The noncompliance has a material effect on the recipient meeting its planned activities as described in its Indian Housing Plan;
( b ) The noncompliance represents a material pattern or practice of activities constituting willful noncompliance with a particular provision of NAHASDA or the regulations, even if a single instance of noncompliance would not be substantial;
( c ) The noncompliance involves the obligation or expenditure of a material amount of the NAHASDA funds budgeted by the recipient for a material activity; or
( d ) The noncompliance places the housing program at substantial risk of fraud, waste or abuse.
[63 FR 12349, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 71529, Dec. 3, 2012]
§ 203.17 Mortgage provisions. ( a ) *Mortgage form.* ( 1 ) The term “mortgage” as used in this part, except § 203.43c, shall have the meaning given in Section 201 of the National Housing Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1707).
( 2 ) ( i ) The mortgage shall be in a form meeting the requirements of the Commissioner. The Commissioner may prescribe complete mortgage instruments. For each case in which the Commissioner does not prescribe complete mortgage instruments, the Commissioner ( A ) Shall require specific language in the mortgage which shall be uniform for every mortgage, and
( B ) May also prescribe the language or substance of additional provisions for all mortgages as well as the language or substance of additional provisions for use only in particular jurisdictions or for particular programs.
( ii ) Each mortgage shall also contain any provisions necessary to create a valid and enforceable secured debt under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the property is located.
( b ) *Mortgage multiples.* A mortgage shall involve a principal obligation in a multiple of $1.
( c ) *Payments.* The mortgage shall: ( 1 ) Come due on the first of the month.
( 2 ) Contain complete amortization provisions satisfactory to the Secretary and an amortization period not in excess of the term of the mortgage.
( 3 ) Provide for payments to principal and interest to begin not later than the first day of the month following 60 days from the date the mortgage is executed (or the date a construction mortgage is converted to a permanent mortgage, if applicable).
( d ) *Maturity.* The mortgage shall have a term of not more than 30 years from the date of the beginning of amortization.
( e ) *Property Standards.* The mortgage must be a first lien upon the property that conforms with property standards prescribed by the Commissioner.
( f ) *Disbursement.* The entire principal amount of the mortgage must have been disbursed to the mortgagor or to his or her creditors for his or her account and with his or her consent.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 45 FR 29278, May 2, 1980; 48 FR 28804, June 23, 1983; 49 FR 21319, May 21, 1984; 53 FR 34281, Sept. 6, 1988; 54 FR 39525, Sept. 27, 1989; 57 FR 58347, Dec. 9, 1992; 61 FR 36263, July 9, 1996; 84 FR 41875, Aug. 15, 2019]
#### § 1003.2 Program objective.

The primary objective of the Indian CDBG (ICDBG) Program and of the community development program of each grantee covered under the Act is the development of viable Indian and Alaska native communities, including decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. The Federal assistance provided in this part is not to be used to reduce substantially the amount of tribal financial support for community development activities below the level of such support before the availability of this assistance.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Voelk, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tomy knowledge, that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Robert L. Voelk      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Robert L. Voelk          |
| Chief Executive  Officer |
| November 14,  2006       |

 

1

----
Exhibit 99.2





Report Of Independent


Registered Public Accounting Firm







To the Board of Directors


Structured Obligations Corporation


New York, New York







We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.





Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.





In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2013.





This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.







/s/ RubinBrown LLP











Overland Park, Kansas


March 11, 2014
For the best experience, open this PDF portfolio in Acrobat 9 or Adobe Reader 9, or later. Get Adobe Reader Now!
Editorial Note on Part 707
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 707 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

§ 707.31 Specific exemptions. The provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H) and (I) and (f) shall not apply to any system of records maintained by DFC that is— ( a ) Subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1);
( b ) Composed of Investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes other than those specified in 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2);
( c ) Required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records;
( d ) Composed of investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility or qualifications for Federal civilian employment, military service, Federal contracts or access to classified information, but only to the extent that DFC may determine, in its sole discretion, that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of the source who, subsequent to September 27, 1975, furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence or, prior to such date, under an implied promise to such effect; and
( e ) Composed of testing or examination materials used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service and DFC determines, in its sole discretion, that disclosure of such materials would compromise the fairness of the testing or examination process.