alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAPHAEL BARRETO,

Petitioner,

v.

M. MARTEL, Warden, 

Respondent.                                                          /

No. C 08-2008 MHP (PR)

ORDER DENYING MOTION TOPROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ONAPPEAL

 The Court denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, entered judgment in

favor of Respondent, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability on February 10,

2010.  Presently before the Court is Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)

on appeal (Docket No. 17).       

Petitioner’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED.  In denying the certificate 

of appealability, the Court concluded that there are no valid grounds for an appeal. 

Accordingly, granting Petitioner’s request to proceed IFP on appeal would not be

appropriate.   

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2010                                                  MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02008-MHP   Document 18   Filed 07/02/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T20:07:33-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 518.27 Allowable costs.

For each kind of recipient, there is a set of Federal principles for determining allowable costs. Allowability of costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles applicable to the entity incurring the costs. Thus, allowability of costs incurred by State, local or federally-recognized Indian tribal governments is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-87, “Cost Principles for State and Local Governments.” The allowability of costs incurred by non-profit organizations is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-122, “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations.” The allowability of costs incurred by institutions of higher education is determined in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.” The allowability of costs incurred by hospitals is determined in accordance with the provisions of Appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, “Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals.” The allowability of costs incurred by commercial organizations and those non-profit organizations listed in Attachment C to Circular A-122 is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 31.
**Fontanella and Babitts**

| CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS | 534 Union Boulevard |
|------------------------------|---------------------|

|   | Totowa Boro, New Jersey 07512 |
|--------|-------------------------------|

|   | Tel: | (973) 595-5300 |
|--------|------|----------------|

|   | Fax: | (973) 595-5890 |
|--------|------|----------------|

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-132059 and 333-119839) of our report, dated December 19, 2008, on the consolidated financial statements of Roebling Financial Corp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) at and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 which report is incorporated by reference into the Registrant’s            Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

 

|   | /s/Fontanella and Babitts |
|--------|---------------------------|

 

December 23, 2008
§ 14.205 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax-exempt organization or a qualified cooperative association must submit with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in § 14.120(f) of this part) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates' assets and liabilities, and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards of the Act and this part. The adjudicative officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) The net worth exhibit shall describe any transfers of assets from, or obligations incurred by, the applicant or any affiliate, occurring in the one-year period before the date on which the proceeding was initiated, that reduced the net worth of the applicant and its affiliates below the applicable net worth ceiling. If there were no such transactions, the applicant shall so state.
( c ) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, an applicant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may submit that portion of the exhibit directly to the adjudicative officer in a sealed envelope labeled “Confidential Financial Information,” accompanied by a motion to withhold the information from public disclosure. The motion shall describe the information sought to be withheld and explain, in detail, why it falls within one or more of the specific exemptions from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b) (1)-(9)), why public disclosure of the information would adversely affect the applicant, and why disclosure is not required in the public interest. The material in question shall be served on counsel representing the agency against which the applicant seeks an award, but need not be served on any other party to the proceeding. If the adjudicative officer finds that the information should not be withheld from disclosure, it shall be placed in the public record of the proceeding. Otherwise, any request to inspect or copy the exhibit shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department's established procedures under the Freedom of Information Act, 24 CFR part 15. In either case, disclosure shall be subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the Department's procedures implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 at 24 CFR part 16.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2510-0001)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ALEXANDER DEJARNETTE,

Defendant. /

No. CR 09-0268 SI

ORDER EXTENDING STAY UNTIL

NOON ON FEBRUARY 19, 2010

The government has moved to extend the stay on defendant’s release. The Court’s February 6,

2010 order stayed defendant’s release until February 12, 2010 to allow the government to file an appeal

and seek a further stay from the Ninth Circuit. The government states that due to weather conditions

in Washington D.C., the government has not been able to obtain the approval necessary to seek a stay

from the Ninth Circuit. The government states that given defendant’s history of leaving the jurisdiction

while on supervised release, the government is concerned that defendant will not appear for future

proceedings if he is unconditionally released.

Based on these circumstances, the Court finds it appropriate to extend the stay until February

19, 2010 at noon, to allow the government additional time to secure approval to seek a stay in the Ninth

Circuit.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 11, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cr-00268-SI Document 109 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 13**

 

**Certification**

** Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:**

 

**The annual report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 20-F.**

 

 
|                    | /s/ Gerardo de Nicolás Gutiérrez |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Dated:   April 29, 2012 | Gerardo   de Nicolás Gutiérrez   |
|                    | Chief   Executive Officer                  |
|                    |                                       |
|                    | /s/   Carlos Moctezuma Velasco             |
| Dated:   April 29, 2012 | Carlos Moctezuma Velasco                   |
|                    | Chief   Financial Officer                  |

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.7





VERMILION ENERGY TRUST


CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code





In connection with the annual report of Vermilion Energy Trust (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lorenzo Donadeo, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada this 24th day of March 2010.






(“Lorenzo Donadeo”)LORENZO DONADEO, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER









EXHIBIT 99.7
 
 VERMILION ENERGY TRUST
 CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 
 In connection with the annual report of Vermilion Energy Trust (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis Hicks, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 
 Dated at Calgary, Alberta, Canada this 24th day of March 2010.
   (“Curtis W. Hicks”)CURTIS W. HICKS, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
#### Annise B. Fitzsimmons, Appellant, v. United States Fire Ins. Co., Respondent.

Motion granted and order dismissing appeal vacated. Respondent’s brief to be filed by August 26, 1960.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEBORAH D. PETERSON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

    v.

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al.,

Defendants.

                                                                           /

No. C 08-80030-MISC JSW

ORDER REFERRING EX PARTEAPPLICATION FOR ENTRY OFORDER AUTHORIZINGPROCESS SERVER TO LEVYEXECUTION TO MAGISTRATEJUDGE

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-1, Plaintiffs’ ex parte application for entry of order

authorizing process server to levy execution in the above captioned matter is HEREBY

REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge Zimmerman to prepare a report and recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7, 2010                                                                JEFFREY S. WHITEUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: Wings Hom

Case 3:08-mc-80030-JSW   Document 254   Filed 05/07/10   Page 1 of 1
### §3272. Cooperative assistance to State and other public agencies; types of assistance; private engineering services

In order to provide soil surveys to assist States, their political subdivisions, soil and water conservation districts, towns, cities, planning boards and commissions, community development districts, and other public agencies in community planning and resource development for the protection and improvement of the quality of the environment, recreational development, the conservation of land and water resources, the development of multiple uses of such resources, and the control and prevention of pollution from sediment and other pollutants in areas of rapidly changing uses, including farm and nonfarm areas, the Secretary of Agriculture shall, upon the request of a State or other public agency, provide by means of such cooperative arrangements with the State or other public agency as he may deem advisable, the following assistance with respect to such areas and purposes:

(1) the making of studies and reports necessary for the classification and interpretation of kinds of soil;

(2) an intensification of the use and benefits of the National Cooperative Soil Survey;

(3) the furnishing of technical and other assistance needed for use of soil surveys; and

(4) consultation with other Federal agencies participating or assisting in the planning and development of such areas in order to assure the coordination of the work under this chapter with the related work of such other agencies.

The provision by the Secretary of such assistance shall not interfere with the furnishing of engineering services by private engineering firms or consultants for on-site sampling and testing of sites or for design and construction of specific engineering works.

(Pub. L. 89–560, §2, Sept. 7, 1966, 80 Stat. 706.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOY NWABUEZE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 3:09-cv-01529-SI 

ORDER TO PROVIDE RESPONSE

A letter from claimant Cleodis Logan was received by the Court on March 9, 2016. See 

Dkt. No. 315. He indicates dissatisfaction with the pace and responsiveness of the claims 

handling process.

The Court ORDERS counsel, jointly or separately, to file a response with the Court, 

addressing the specific complaints made by Mr. Logan in his letter, and also informing the Court 

of the status of the settlement. Please include information as to the total amount of money paid 

out thus far and how many claims those payments cover; the totals remaining to be paid and how 

many claims that covers; and the anticipated date for conclusion of the process.

This response shall be filed no later than March 18, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2016

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01529-SI Document 316 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 1
1.  I have reviewed this annual report
        on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, the
        information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
        not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the
        distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
 
 4.  I am responsible for reviewing the
        activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
        depositor and the trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.
 
 
  
 In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.
 
 By:  /s/ James G. MillardName:  James G. MillardTitle:    President
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification ofCo-Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May  11, 2004 | /s/ Larry  Thomas          |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                 | Larry Thomas               |
|                 | Co-Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

 

**Certification ofCo-Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May  11, 2004 | /s/ Marty  Albertson       |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                 | Marty  Albertson           |
|                 | Co-Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

 

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: May  11, 2004 | /s/ Bruce  Ross         |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | Bruce Ross              |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 203.421 Allocation of Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund income or loss.

For any semiannual period in which Mutual Mortgage Insurance operations shall result in a net income, or loss, the Commissioner shall allocate, after taking into account the actuarial status of the entire Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, such net income or such loss to the General Surplus Account and/or to the Participating Reserve Account as the Commissioner may determine to be in accord with sound actuarial and accounting practice. In determining net income or loss, the Commissioner shall take into consideration all income received from fees, premiums and earnings on investments of the fund, operating expenses and provision for losses to the fund.

[56 FR 18948, Apr. 24, 1991]
§ 206.31 Allowable charges and fees. ( a ) *Fees at closing.* The mortgagee may collect, either in cash at the time of closing or through an initial payment under the mortgage, the following charges and fees incurred in connection with the origination, processing, and closing of the mortgage loan: ( 1 ) *Loan Origination Fee.* Mortgagees may charge a loan origination fee and may use such fee to pay for services performed by a sponsored third-party originator. The loan origination fee limit shall be the greater of $2,500 or two percent of the maximum claim amount of $200,000, plus one percent of any portion of the maximum claim amount that is greater than $200,000. Mortgagees may accept a lower origination fee. Mortgagees may pay fees for services performed by a sponsored third-party originator and these fees may be included as part of the loan origination fee. The total amount of the loan origination fee may not exceed $6,000, except that the Commissioner may through notice adjust the maximum limit in accordance with the annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index of the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor in increments of $500 only when the percentage increase in such index, when applied to the maximum origination fee, produces dollar increases that exceed $500. The loan origination fee may be fully financed with the mortgage.
( 2 ) *Reasonable and customary amounts.* Reasonable and customary amounts, but not more than the amount actually paid by the mortgagee, for any of the following items: ( i ) Recording fees and recording taxes, or other charges incident to the recordation of the insured mortgage;
( ii ) Credit report;
( iii ) Survey, if required by the mortgagee or the borrower;
( iv ) Title examination;
( v ) Mortgagee's title insurance;
( vi ) Fees paid to an appraiser for the initial appraisal of the property;
( vii ) Flood certifications; and
( viii ) Such other charges as may be authorized by the Commissioner.
( b ) *Repair administration fee.* If the property requires repairs after closing in order to meet FHA requirements, the mortgagee may collect a fee for each occurrence as compensation for administrative duties relating to repair work pursuant to § 206.47(c) and (d), not to exceed the greater of one and one-half percent of the amount advanced for the repairs or fifty dollars. The mortgagee shall collect the repair fee by adding it to the outstanding loan balance.