alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13**

 

**Certification**

** Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Desarrolladora Homex, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:**

 

**The annual report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form 20-F”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 20-F.**

 

 
|                        | /s/ Gerardo de Nicolás Gutiérrez |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Dated:   June 29, 2011 | Gerardo   de Nicolás Gutiérrez   |
|                        | Chief   Executive Officer                  |
|                        |                                       |
|                        | /s/   Carlos Moctezuma Velasco             |
| Dated:   June 29, 2011 | Carlos Moctezuma Velasco                   |
|                        | Chief   Financial Officer                  |

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
### §6979a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §7010, as added Pub. L. 98–616, title IV, §405(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3273; Pub. L. 99–339, title II, §201(c)(1), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 654, relating to interim control of hazardous waste injection, was renumbered section 3020 of Pub. L. 89–272 by Pub. L. 99–339, title II, §201(c)(2), June 19, 1986, 100 Stat. 654, and transferred to section 6939b of this title.
### §5196d. Use of funds to prepare for and respond to hazards

Funds made available to the States under this subchapter may be used by the States for the purposes of preparing for hazards and providing emergency assistance in response to hazards. Regulations prescribed to carry out this section shall authorize the use of emergency preparedness personnel, materials, and facilities supported in whole or in part through contributions under this subchapter for emergency preparedness activities and measures related to hazards.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title VI, §615, as added Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2289 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §3412(a).
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Frank Elenio, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RoomLinX, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: September 13, 2005


                                              /s/ Frank Elenio
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Frank Elenio
                                              Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1














CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: December 11, 2014









By: /s/  Michael S. Wasik


Michael S. Wasik


Chief Executive Officer


(principal executive officer)











By: /s/  Michael S. Wasik


Interim Chief Financial Officer


(principal financial officer)
#### § 231.08 Event of Default; Application for Compensation; payment.

At any time after an Event of Default, as this term is defined in an Eligible Note, any Noteholder hereunder, or the Fiscal Agent on behalf of a Noteholder hereunder, may file with USAID an Application for Compensation in the form provided in Appendix A to this part. USAID shall pay or cause to be paid to any such Applicant any compensation specified in such Application for Compensation that is due to the Applicant pursuant to the Guarantee as a Loss of Investment not later than three (3) Business Days after the Date of Application. In the event that USAID receives any other notice of an Event of Default, USAID may pay any compensation that is due to any Noteholder pursuant to a Guarantee, whether or not such Noteholder has filed with USAID an Application for Compensation in respect of such amount.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLIED TELESIS CAPITAL CORP.,

Plaintiff,

 v.

IP TRIPLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-05696 CRB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed without prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service

of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been

delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to

the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: February 26, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05696-CRB Document 54 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1425

In Re: JAMES H. DICKEY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-93-117-3) Submitted: September 10, 1996 Decided: September 24, 1996 Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. James H. Dickey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Dickey petitions this court for a Writ of Mandamusdirecting that his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), be reassigned from Judge Patrick Duffy to Judge Mathew Perry, who was originally assigned to his case. He also requests that the district court clerk be prohibited from further reassigning his case until some "random selection process" can be employed, and asks that Judge Duffy also be directed to vacate every order he has entered in his case. Dickey's petition follows Judge Duffy's denial of Dickey's motion requesting that Judge Duffy recuse himself. A party seeking mandamus relief must show that he has no other means of relief and that his right to the relief he seeks is "clear and indisputable." See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). We find that Dickey has failed to provide any legitimate basis for his contentions that Judge Duffy should not be permitted to decide his case. Dickey asserts that the reassignment of hiscase to Judge Duffy has prejudiced him and results in the appearance of impropriety. If he is claiming that Judge Duffy is somehow biased against him, he has not identified any extrajudicial source for that bias, as he must do in order to obtain mandamus relief. Id. at 827. Dickey also claims that the reassignment was administratively improper. He contends that the district court clerk lacked the authority to reassign his case, that the reassignment process was not random, and that reassignment to Judge Duffy is problematic because Judge Perry had already issued pretrial rulings in his3case, the basis for which Judge Duffy was unfamiliar. Dickey, however, has provided no authority to support his claims of impropriety, and we decline to interfere with the district court's case management practices. Accordingly, the petition for a Writ of Mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM
10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,355
<SECURITIES>                                     4,988
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,503)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,214
<PP&E>                                          27,352
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,366
<SALES>                                         82,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,175
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,033
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,190
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.30


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as createdby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officerof Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 7, 2005 | /s/ Bruce Ross          |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                        | Bruce Ross              |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 08-5528 RS (PR)

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

*E-Filed 6/21/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JEFFREY WAYNE ROAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEN CURRY, et al., 

Defendants. /

No. C 08-5528 RS (PR)

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This is a federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a pro se state

prisoner. Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s amended

complaint was due June 16, 2010. Plaintiff still has not filed an amended complaint. 

Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 21, 2010 

 RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05528-RS Document 31 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 1
### §7435. Low emissions electricity program

#### (a) Appropriation

In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Administrator for fiscal year 2022, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to remain available until September 30, 2031—

(1) $17,000,000 for consumer-related education and partnerships with respect to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that result from domestic electricity generation and use;

(2) $17,000,000 for education, technical assistance, and partnerships within low-income and disadvantaged communities with respect to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that result from domestic electricity generation and use;

(3) $17,000,000 for industry-related outreach, technical assistance, and partnerships with respect to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that result from domestic electricity generation and use;

(4) $17,000,000 for outreach and technical assistance to, and partnerships with, State, Tribal, and local governments with respect to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that result from domestic electricity generation and use;

(5) $1,000,000 to assess, not later than 1 year after August 16, 2022, the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions that result from changes in domestic electricity generation and use that are anticipated to occur on an annual basis through fiscal year 2031; and

(6) $18,000,000 to ensure that reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are achieved through use of the existing authorities of this chapter, incorporating the assessment under paragraph (5).

#### (b) Administration of funds

Of the amounts made available under subsection (a), the Administrator shall reserve 2 percent for the administrative costs necessary to carry out activities pursuant to that subsection.

#### (c) Definition of greenhouse gas

In this section, the term "greenhouse gas" means the air pollutants carbon dioxide, hydrofluorocarbons, methane, nitrous oxide, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §135, as added Pub. L. 117–169, title VI, §60107, Aug. 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 2069.)
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-08-31T01:23:06-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### FRIES et al., Appellants, v. PIKE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 16, 1905.)

’Action by Fred F. Fries and another against John Pike.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, with costs. Held, that the answer did not state facts showing that the title to real estate would come in question upon the trial.
CARLTON WAYNE KEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5399

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Shonna Young Gay, Judge.

Carlton Wayne Key, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 No. CR 09-0376 SI

v.

ORDER TO PAY ADDITIONAL

JUDY YEUNG, ATTENDANCE FEE

 also known as “Miu Wan Yeung”,

Defendant

 )

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1871(b)(2), petit jurors required to attend more than ten (10)

days in hearing one case may be paid, in the discretion of the trial judge, an additional fee, not exceeding

$10.00 more than the $40.00 attendance fee, for each day in excess of ten (10) days on which the juror

is required to hear such case.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that each member of the jury hearing the above case shall

receive a total attendance fee of $50.00 per day for each day of service in excess of ten (10) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 15, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cr-00376-SI Document 142 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 1
### §7513b. Issuance of RACM and BACM guidance

The Administrator shall issue, in the same manner and according to the same procedure as guidance is issued under section 7408(c) of this title, technical guidance on reasonably available control measures and best available control measures for urban fugitive dust, and emissions from residential wood combustion (including curtailments and exemptions from such curtailments) and prescribed silvicultural and agricultural burning, no later than 18 months following November 15, 1990. The Administrator shall also examine other categories of sources contributing to nonattainment of the PM–10 standard, and determine whether additional guidance on reasonably available control measures and best available control measures is needed, and issue any such guidance no later than 3 years after November 15, 1990. In issuing guidelines and making determinations under this section, the Administrator (in consultation with the State) shall take into account emission reductions achieved, or expected to be achieved, under subchapter IV–A and other provisions of this chapter.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §190, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title I, §105(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2462.)