alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1006.335 Use of nonprofit organizations and public-private partnerships. ( a ) *Nonprofit organizations.* The DHHL must, to the extent practicable, provide for private nonprofit organizations experienced in the planning and development of affordable housing for Native Hawaiians to carry out affordable housing activities with NHHBG funds.
( b ) *Public-private partnerships.* The DHHL must make all reasonable efforts to maximize participation by the private sector, including nonprofit organizations and for-profit entities, in implementing its housing plan.
!"		 #	$
%

"&'# %(
)"!"**(")!"  #	$
))*%+

,-




,
 

, 
 ,
 
 ,   , 
,,-





,,

 &'$.))#%(
 !"!"
)"
)
#	$
))%#%/'
,
,,-

,

0





,


,
,0-
1
,  1!!234

 563,"#6%# %#$%3,'
-$

7KH +RQRUDEOH -DPHV * &DUU 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW -XGJH IRU WKH1RUWKHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 2KLR VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,213XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU)LOH 1DPH DS	

		!7389:'2;89$23$&28<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<4,&+$(/9(15<'0,7+
"##

$!('(5$//85($8 2)=5,6216%


"##


>	
1,&
'?

$:?

@01,	A93+
,
B?

B'
C1	 ?
!
,C1	 /C@:289?1&D983:E$

B($133?

B	




	
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
4
,9'
EF$
4



=:3$&32144
,9 '
   ,
 ,  

   


 
,

, *&'$.""',1

&'
G-
$

,1
)" )" ),
,


()*
"&
	


*
"&'"** #)%8
,3,"#6%#%3,'
-$

&-


 , 
,   ,  
 !31="#%"+)","*%'-+%)'","+!'-)*%'0
H
,,
'

,

!,/ =
 
,
',1

,,
'

,,'
C#%
,
28'22
  
 
,  , 
 ,

 
 ,,
,0 ,
,6
(# %


0

,, 
,,,,H
',1(#"%
 H
   
 
   /  =

I
,,
,
(J#%
H


,




    ,, ,,( #
%  5H



,,I
J
,	
	




"
5 
       ,



 I 
(J  #	%  /  =
  

,,


,,
,,'

    
,  
 
  
 ,, ,
 - 
       


 
  &





,
 &'$.))
'
,,-




'
5





,,,,%.+).-*'


,


  ', 1   H
 





,


'

',1"))
H
,,,-
'
 ;2K '
 1   ', 1H


,/=)
0
,
,
/=/=
3
, ?
  D, $,   / =
9=
G


31))
 1
, 	 ))	 H
  
  - ,,
,,


 
 
,
 ,,
 ,,
 
 

    &'$.))#%(+
" &'"# %(
,
)"!"*	*#	$
)))%(&   !"   #	 $
 ))%  8
H
,

',1    15 

 -
8-





 ,   

 

 






,
§ 125.301 Education and Outreach Initiative. ( a ) The Education and Outreach Initiative provides funding for the purpose of developing, implementing, carrying out, or coordinating education and outreach programs designed to inform members of the public concerning their rights and obligations under the provisions of fair housing laws.
( b ) Notices of Funding Availability published for the FHIP may divide Education and Outreach Initiative funding into separate competitions for each of the separate types of programs (i.e., national, regional and/or local, community-based) eligible under this Initiative.
( c ) National program applications, including those for Fair Housing Month funding, may be eligible to receive, as provided for in Notices of Funding Availability published in the Federal Register, a preference consisting of additional points if they: ( 1 ) Demonstrate cooperation with real estate industry organizations; and/or
( 2 ) Provide for the dissemination of educational information and technical assistance to support compliance with the housing adaptability and accessibility guidelines contained in the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988.
( d ) Activities that are regional are activities that are implemented in adjoining States or two or more units of general local government within a state. Activities that are local are activities whose implementation is limited to a single unit of general local government, meaning a city, town, township, county, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State. Activities that are community-based in scope are those which are primarily focused on a particular neighborhood area within a unit of general local government.
( e ) Each non-governmental recipient of regional, local, or community-based funding for activities located within the jurisdiction of a State or local enforcement agency or agencies administering a substantially equivalent (under part 115 of this subchapter) fair housing law must consult with the agency or agencies to coordinate activities funded under FHIP.
YearIDHPMSVTypeID yearIDHPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 2013 10 2013 26883412.75 0 2013 20 2013 6421775220 0 2013 30 2013 1951567744 0 2013 40 2013 34274185.64 0 2013 50 2013 302738455.9 0 2013 60 2013 416627754.3 0
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0555

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEPHANIE LYNN LEDOUX,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 22, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2023

12/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0555
#### § 51.9 Amendment of passports.

Except for the convenience of the U.S. Government, no passport may be amended.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2817

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain basketballs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain basketballs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BASKETBALLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.95.06 Basketballs other than leather, rubber, or synthetic (provided for in subheading 

9506.62.80) ......................... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2817 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Atkinson *v.*First National Bank of Hawkinsville.

April 11, 1912.

Rehearing denied May 14, 1912.

Evans, P. J.

1. To a suit by the holder of a negotiable note, the maker pleaded, as failure of consideration, that the consideration of the npte was the exclusive right to sell, within certain territory, a mechanical tool manufactured by the payee, and that the payee contracted in writing that he would furnish at a certain price the article contracted to be sold, which was to be in every way equal to and perfect as the sample, or purchase-price would be refunded; that the tool furnished was unmerchantable and not reasonably suited to the uses intended; that he asked the holder to discount the note for him at 50 cents on the dollar, and' notified him that he would not protect the note further than to the extent of 50 per cent, of the note, as it was quite likely that the consideration of the note would partially or totally fail, and urged upon the holder not to buy the note unless he procured it at 50 cents on the dollar; and that the holder agreed to discount the note for the maker at 50 cents on the dollar. *Held,*that the plea set up no meritorious defense.

2. To authorize the setting aside of a verdict on account of the defendant’s having been providentially prevented from being present at the trial, it must appear that he had a meritorious defense to the action. *Peacock*v. *Usry,*52 *Ga.*353. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*128Complaint. Before Judge Parker. Pulaski superior court. August 15, 1911.

*H. F. Lawson,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. L. & Warren Grice,*centra.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1735

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK

COMPANY,

Petitioner,

versus

VON PATRICK; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(99-789, 00-291)

Submitted: December 29, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan H. Walker, MASON, COWARDIN & MASON, Newport News, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory Edward Camden, MONTAGNA, KLEIN &

CAMDEN, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company seeks review of

the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s and District Director’s orders awarding attorney’s fees to claimant’s counsel pursuant to the Longshore and

Harbor Workers Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1986

& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the Board. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock

Co. v. Von Patrick, Nos. 99-789, 00-291 (BRB Apr. 14, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. De p artment Trans p ort Air p lane Directorate of Trans p ortation A ircraft Certification Service

Federal Aviation 1601 Lind Avenue, S. W.
Administration Renton, Washington 98057-3356

March 4, 2011

Ms. C.M. Thompson Lead Project Administrator

M/C 03-56 The Boeing Company

P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Dear Ms. Thompson:

We have received your letter BDCO-11-00741, dated February 22, 2011, which is a petition to amend Exemption No. 9793B. The petition requests:

 Revising Limitation 12 to remove the illumination requirements for the airplane in the tail down attitude with the escape slide installed.

 Removing Limitation 17c in anticipation that Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.809(a), at Amendment 116, will be removed from the 747-8F certification basis by exception.

Your petition has been entered into existing Docket No. FAA-2008-0348. However, the Transport Airplane Directorate cannot begin work on this petition for exemption until the Seattle Aircraft Certification Office has complete d the exception to remove 14 CFR 25.809(a) at

Amendment 116 from the 747-8F certification basis.

While reviewing your petition we noticed that page 2 contains a proprietary statement. You can submit a replacement petition to the Federal Docket Management System with the proprietary statement removed and request that the existing petition be removed from the docket.

We have determined that for the good cause shown in your letter, your petition should not be delayed by the publication and comment procedures included in 14 CFR part 11. Therefore, we have waived the requirement for Federal Register publication and comment. Even though we

have waived Federal Register publication and comment pursuant to your petition, you should not construe this action to be tacit approval of your request.

Please note that according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), a petition for exemption must be sent to the FAA at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. You will be advised of the agency's decision on your petition as soon as possible.2

In the meantime, should you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please contact Jayson Claar of this office at (425) 227-2194, jayson.claar@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

Signed by Kenna Sinclair

Kenna Sinclair

Standardization Branch Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service
§ 96.69 Filing of complaints against accredited agencies and approved persons. ( a ) Complaints described in § 96.68 will be subject to review by the accrediting entity pursuant to §§ 96.71 and 96.72, when submitted as provided in this section and § 96.70.
( b ) Complaints against accredited agencies and approved persons by parties to specific intercountry adoption cases and relating to that case must first be submitted by the complainant in writing to the primary provider and to the agency or person providing adoption services, if a U.S. provider different from the primary provider. If the complaint cannot be resolved through the complaint processes of the primary provider or the agency or person providing the services (if different), or if the complaint was resolved by an agreement to take action but the primary provider or the agency or person providing the service (if different) failed to take such action within thirty days of agreeing to do so, the complaint may then be filed with the Complaint Registry in accordance with § 96.70.
( c ) An individual who is not party to a specific intercountry adoption case but who has information about an accredited agency or approved person may provide that information by filing it in the form of a complaint with the Complaint Registry in accordance with § 96.70.
( d ) A Federal, State, or local government official or a foreign Central Authority may file a complaint with the Complaint Registry in accordance with § 96.70, or may raise the matter in writing directly with the accrediting entity, who will record the complaint in the Complaint Registry, or with the Secretary, who will record the complaint in the Complaint Registry, if appropriate, and refer it to the accrediting entity for review pursuant to § 96.71 or take such other action as the Secretary deems appropriate.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40636, July 14, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 706

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 706 appear at 84 FR 37751, Aug. 2, 2019.

#### § 706.1 Description.

This part contains the rules that the US International Development Finance Corporation (“DFC”) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. 552 as amended. These rules should be read together with the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget. Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with DFC's Privacy Act regulations at 22 CFR part 707 as well as under this subpart.
§ 203.371 Partial claim. ( a ) *General.* Notwithstanding the conveyance, sale or assignment requirements for payment of a claim elsewhere in this part, HUD will pay partial FHA insurance benefits to mortgagees after a period of forbearance, the maximum length of which HUD will prescribe, and in accordance with this section.
( b ) *Requirements.* The following conditions must be met for payment of a partial claim: ( 1 ) The mortgagor has been delinquent for at least 4 months or such other time prescribed by HUD;
( 2 ) The amount of the arrearage has not exceeded the equivalent of 12 monthly mortgage payments;
( 3 ) The mortgagor is able to resume making full monthly mortgage payments;
( 4 ) The mortgagor is not financially able to make sufficient additional payments to repay the arrearage within a time frame specified by HUD;
( 5 ) The mortgagor is not financially qualified to support monthly mortgage payments on a modified mortgage or on a refinanced mortgage in which the total arrearage is included; and
( 6 ) The mortgagor must have made a minimum number of monthly payments as prescribed by the Secretary on a case-by-case basis.
( c ) *Repayment of the subordinate lien.* The mortgagor must execute a mortgage in favor of HUD with terms and conditions acceptable to HUD for the amount of the partial claim under § 203.414(a). HUD may require the mortgagee to be responsible for servicing the subordinate mortgage on behalf of HUD.
( d ) *Application for insurance benefits.* Along with the prescribed application for partial claim insurance benefits, the mortgagee shall provide HUD with the original credit instrument no later than 60 days after execution. The mortgagee shall provide HUD with the original security instrument, required by paragraph (c) of this section, no later than 6 months following the date of execution. If the mortgagee experiences a delay from the recording authority, it may request an extension of time, in writing, from HUD. If the mortgagee does not provide the original of the note and security instrument within the prescribed deadlines, the mortgagee shall be required to reimburse the amount of the claim paid, including the incentive.
[61 FR 35018, July 3, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 60130, Nov. 6, 1997; 72 FR 56161, Oct. 2, 2007]
### §8286a. Use of factors and data

Factors and data consented to pursuant to section 8286 of this title may be revised and agreed to by a consensus of the heads of the various Federal agencies involved. Such factors and data shall be used by all Federal agencies in establishing and revising various energy conservation standards used by such agencies, except that other factors and data may be used with respect to the standards applicable to any program if—

(1) the other factors and data are approved by the Secretary of Energy solely on the basis that such other factors and data are critical to meet the unique needs of the program concerned;

(2) using the consented to factors and data would cause a violation of an express provision of law; or

(3) statutory requirements or responsibilities require a modification of the consented to factors and data.

(Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §596, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 762.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Security Act, and not as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 9.5 Original classification authority. ( a ) Authority for original classification of information as Top Secret may be exercised by the Secretary and those officials delegated this authority in writing by the Secretary. Such authority has been delegated to the Deputy Secretaries, the Under Secretaries, the Counselor, Assistant Secretaries and equivalents; Chiefs of Mission and U.S. representatives to international organizations; and certain other officers within the Department and at posts abroad.
( b ) Authority for original classification of information as Secret or Confidential may be exercised only by the Secretary, the Senior Agency Official, and those officials delegated this authority in writing by the Secretary or the Senior Agency Official. Such authority has been delegated to Deputy Assistant Secretaries, Principal Officers at consulates general and consulates abroad, and certain other officers within the Department and at posts abroad. In the absence of the Secret or Confidential classification authority, the person designated to act for that official may exercise that authority.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2527 

To expand the bases on which student loan borrowers may obtain deferments 

of their repayment obligations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To expand the bases on which student loan borrowers may 

obtain deferments of their repayment obligations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Residents and Public 

5 Interest Attorneys Deferment Act’’ . 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL DEFERMENTS. 

7 (a) FFEL AND DIRECT LOANS.—Section 

8 428(b)(1)(M) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

9 U.S.C. 1078(b)(1)(M)) is amended— 
2 

•HR 2527 IH 

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ii); 

2 and 

3 (2) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

4 new clauses: 

5 ‘‘(iv) during any period in which the 

6 borrower is serving an internship, or a 

7 medical or dental residency, the successful 

8 completion of which is required in order to 

9 receive professional recognition required to 

10 begin professional practice or service; 

11 ‘‘(v) not in excess of 2 years during 

12 which the borrower is serving in a public 

13 service fellowship with any public entity, 

14 such as service under subtitle D of title I 

15 of the National and Community Service 

16 Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12571 et seq.); or 

17 ‘‘(vi) not in excess of 2 years during 

18 which the borrower is employed full-time 

19 as a public defender or prosecutor;’’. 

20 (b) PERKINS LOANS.—Section 464(c)(2)(A) of such 

21 Act (20 U.S.C. 1087dd(c)(2)(A)) is amended— 

22 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (iii); 

23 (2) by redesignating clause (iv) as clause (vii); 

24 and 
3 

•HR 2527 IH 

1 (3) by inserting after clause (iii) the following 

2 new clauses: 

3 ‘‘(iv) during any period in which the borrower 

4 is serving an internship, or a medical or dental resi5 dency, the successful completion of which is required 

6 in order to receive professional recognition required 

7 to begin professional practice or service; 

8 ‘‘(v) not in excess of 2 years during which the 

9 borrower is serving in a public service fellowship 

10 with any public entity, such as service under subtitle 

11 D of title I of the National and Community Service 

12 Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12571 et seq.); 

13 ‘‘(vi) not in excess of 2 years during which the 

14 borrower is employed full-time as a public defender 

15 or prosecutor; or’’. 

Æ
#### § 1003.603 Labor standards.

In accordance with the authority under section 107(e)(2) of the Act, the Secretary waives the provisions of section 110 of the Act (Labor Standards) with respect to this part, including the requirement that laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor or subcontractor in the performance of construction work financed in whole or in part with assistance received under this part be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing on similar construction in the locality, as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276 a to a-7).
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4250 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4250

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 3-year 
extension of the exclusion of income from the discharge of indebtedness 
                   on qualified principal residences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2012

  Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 3-year 
extension of the exclusion of income from the discharge of indebtedness 
                   on qualified principal residences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3-YEAR EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION OF INCOME FROM DISCHARGE OF 
              INDEBTEDNESS ON QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES.

    (a) Extension.--Subparagraph (E) of section 108(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 
2013'' and inserting ``January 1, 2016''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to discharges of indebtedness occurring after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```