alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 15.203 Making a demand for production of material or provision of testimony. ( a ) Any demand made to the Department or an employee of the Department to produce any material or provide any testimony in a legal proceeding among private litigants must: ( 1 ) Be submitted in writing to the Department or employee of the Department, with a copy to the Appropriate Associate General Counsel or Appropriate Regional Counsel, no later than 30 days before the date the material or testimony is required;
( 2 ) State, with particularity, the material or testimony sought;
( 3 ) If testimony is requested, state: ( i ) The intended use of the testimony, and
( ii ) Whether expert or opinion testimony will be sought from the employee;
( 4 ) State whether the production of such material or provision of such testimony could reveal classified, confidential, or privileged material;
( 5 ) Summarize the need for and relevance of the material or testimony sought in the legal proceeding and include a copy of the complaint, if available;
( 6 ) State whether the material or testimony is available from any other source and, if so, state all such other sources;
( 7 ) State why no document[s], or declaration[s] or affidavit[s], could be used in lieu of oral testimony that is being sought;
( 8 ) Estimate the amount of time the employee will need in order to prepare for, travel to, and attend the legal proceeding, as appropriate;
( 9 ) State why the production of the material or provision of the testimony is appropriate under the rules of procedure governing the legal proceeding for which it is sought (e.g., not be unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the relevant rules governing discovery); and
( 10 ) Describe how producing such material or providing such testimony would affect the interests of the United States.
( b ) If the Department determines that the requestor has failed to provide the information required by paragraph (a) of this section, or that the information provided is insufficient to consider the demand in accordance with § 15.204, the Department may require that additional information be provided by the requestor before the demand is considered.
( c ) Whenever a demand is made upon the Department or an employee of the Department for the production of material or provision of testimony, the employee shall immediately notify the Appropriate Associate General Counsel or Appropriate Regional Counsel.
[73 FR 72205, Nov. 26, 2008]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 85 (Thursday, May 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 25781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10397]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8306]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Dominican Republic

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to the Dominican Republic 
and I hereby waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to Congress, and the determination shall be published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 6, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2013-10397 Filed 5-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
J

- S25037

- 16

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 DANIEL L. SPUCK IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant

v. PROGRESS NEWSPAPER, INC. JANE/JOHN DOES, PART IES/EMPLOYEES OF, AND LELAND B. MA THER, JR., CHIEF EDITOR, ET AL Appellees No. 1495 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Order August 13 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County Civil Division at No(s): 2015

- 1219

- CD

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., MUNDY, J., and JENKINS, J. MEMORANDUM BY JENKINS, J.: FILED MARCH 28, 2016 Daniel Spuck appeals from an order dismissing his in forma pauperis civil complaint against Progress Newspaper, Inc. and Leland Mather. We affirm. The record reveals that on August 12, 2015, Spuck filed a civil complaint alleging that he had “newly discovered evidence” that appellees were liable for defamation, negligen ce and fraud based on newspaper articles that they published on December 30, 1995 and April 20, 1996. On the date of his civil complaint, he was serving a sentence of 11

- 22 years’ imprisonment for third degree murder and reckless endangerment. He has bee n serving this sentence since 1995.J

- S25037

- 16

- 2

-

On August 13, 2015, the trial court dismissed Spuck’s action as frivolous pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P. 240(j). Spuck filed a timely notice of appeal and timely statement of matters complained of on appeal. The trial

cour t advised this Court that it will not file any Pa.R.A.P. 1925 opinion. Pa.R.Civ.P. 240(j)(1) provides: “ If, simultaneous with the commencement of an action or proceeding or the taking of an appeal, a party has filed a petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the court prior to acting upon the petition may dismiss the action, proceeding or appeal if the allegation of poverty is untrue or if it is satisfied that the action, proceeding or appeal is frivolous.” We review a trial court’s decision to dis miss an action under Rule 240(j)(1) for abuse of discretion. Lichtman v. Glazer , 111 A.3d 1225, 1227 & n. 3 (Pa.Cmwlth.2015). The trial court observed in its order of dismissal that (1) the statute of limitations for defamation, negligence and fraud ex pired many years ago; (2) while the concept of “newly discovered evidence” is cognizable under the Post Conviction Relief Act, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(ii), this concept is foreign to civil tort law; and (3) Spuck failed to allege any grounds that appellees defamed his character or “caused him to suffer [financial harm] while he has been in prison since 1995.” Based on the trial court’s reasoning, we conclude that Spuck’s civil complaint is frivolous. The trial

c ourt acted within its discretion by dismissing the complaint under Rule 240(j)(1). Order affirmed.J

- S25037

- 16

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 3/28/2016
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30935]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 11, 2011; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Briefing Agenda

    This briefing is open to the public.
    Topic: The Civil Rights Implications of Eminent Domain Abuse.

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: December 3, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30935 Filed 12-6-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
### §8252. Purpose

It is the purpose of this part to promote the conservation and the efficient use of energy and water, and the use of renewable energy sources, by the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title V, §542, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3277; Pub. L. 100–615, §2(a), Nov. 5, 1988, 102 Stat. 3185; Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §152(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2844.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–486 inserted "and water, and the use of renewable energy sources," after "use of energy".

1988—Pub. L. 100–615 amended section generally, substituting statement of purpose for policy statement declaring it to be United States policy for Federal Government to have the opportunity and responsibility, with participation of industry, to further develop, demonstrate, and promote use of energy conservation, solar heating and cooling, and other renewable energy sources in Federal buildings.
### §§1096 to 1098. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section 1096, act May 2, 1890, ch. 182, §24, 26 Stat. 92, related to fraudulent settlement of open lands.

Section 1097, act May 2, 1890, ch. 182, §27, 26 Stat. 93, related to rights of occupants of lands prior to May 2, 1890.

Section 1098, act Mar. 3, 1891, ch. 543, §16, 26 Stat. 1026, provided that all lands in Oklahoma be deemed agricultural lands for purposes of entry.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### § 232.625 Discrimination prohibited.

Any contract or subcontract executed for the installation of equipment, or construction of improvements to the project shall provide that there shall be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, religion, race, color, creed or national origin.
#### GALLIGER, Appellant, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 15, 1905.)

Action by George Galliger, an infant, etc., against the city of Rochester. No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without costs, on stipulation.
### §5913. Evaluation by National Institute of Standards and Technology of energy-related inventions prior to awarding of grants by Secretary; promulgation of regulations

The National Institute of Standards and Technology shall give particular attention to the evaluation of all promising energy-related inventions, particularly those submitted by individual inventors and small companies for the purpose of obtaining direct grants from the Secretary. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is authorized to promulgate regulations in the furtherance of this section.

(Pub. L. 93–577, §14, Dec. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 1894; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), title VII, §§703, 707, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 606, 607; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "National Bureau of Standards" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary", meaning Secretary of Energy, substituted in text for "Administrator", meaning Administrator of Energy Research and Development Administration, pursuant to sections 301(a), 703, and 707 of Pub. L. 95–91, which are classified to sections 7151(a), 7293, and 7297 of this title and which terminated Energy Research and Development Administration and transferred its functions and functions of Administrator thereof (with certain exceptions) to Secretary of Energy.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Docket 46-2004]


ExxonMobil Corporation--Expansion of Manufacturing Authority; 
Extension of Comment Period

    The comment period for the application submitted by the Port of 
Houston Authority on behalf of ExxonMobil Corporation (ExxonMobil), to 
expand the scope of manufacturing activity conducted under zone 
procedures within Subzone 84O at the ExxonMobil oil refinery complex in 
Baytown, Texas (69 FR 64026, 11/3/04), is being extended to January 18, 
2005, to allow interested parties additional time in which to comment. 
Rebuttal comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, 
until February 2, 2005. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be 
addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at one of the following 
addresses:
    1. Submissions Via Express/Package Delivery Services: Foreign-
Trade-Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Franklin Court 
Building--Suite 4100W, 1099 14th St., NW., Washington, DC 20005; or
    2. Submissions Via the U.S. Postal Service: Foreign-Trade-Zones 
Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, FCB--Suite 4100W, 1401 Constitution 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: December 16, 2004.
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-28434 Filed 12-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
January 12, 2016

Dear Mr. Camnitz:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 4361). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s) , and type(s)(i.e., fi xed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air), and power source for the pr oposed UAS operation. The description(s)
should include the maximum we ight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 1/26/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–2999.

Sincerely,
/S/ Program Analyst
Reducing Poverty Through Growth

Fact Sheet

September 9, 2005 www.mcc.gov

Mozambique and Millennium Challenge Corporation: 

Investing in Compact Development

Millennium Challenge Corporation has approved up to $6,000,000 to assist Mozambique in the development of 

a Millennium Challenge Account Compact.

The Government of Mozambique’s compact proposal focuses on improving and increasing access to water and 

sanitation and providing business development assistance in four northern provinces of Mozambique—C abo 

Delgado, Niassa, Nampula and Zambézia. Fifty-two percent of the nation’s poor live in these four provinces 

and MCC believes the proposed program has the potential to help lift tens of thousands of Mozambicans out of 

poverty.

The approved funding will be used to assist Mozambique in the further development of its program design and 

implementation. Specifically it will be used to:

•	 Perform feasibility and baseline studies, conduct environmental analyses and develop engineering and 

design plans for proposed infrastructure projects;

•	 Assess market demand, identify necessary regulatory issues and infrastructure requirements, and 

perform preliminary financial, economic, and environmental analyses for a proposed export processing 

zone;

•	 Analyze the needs and resources in the four northern provinces, as part of the design of proposed 

business service centers, as they relate to sectors named in the proposal – such as agriculture, forestry, 

eco-tourism, and light industry;

•	 Further design the proposed land tenure activities to increase economic productivity, involving modernized registration system, use of technology and training to support implementation of proposed reforms; 

and

•	 Provide technical support and program development services to the MCA-Mozambique core team.

Under the leadership of the Ministry of Planning and Development and the MCA Mozambique Team, civil 

society and private sector representatives will continue to be essential participants in the Compact development 

process.
### Tribal NSR Meeting
Wednesday, May 4 , 2011

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On May 4 , 2011 , representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) participated in a outreach/consultation conference call to answer que stions from various

tribes on the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country, ” commonly known as the “Tribal NSR Rule.” During this meeting

, various tr ibal representatives discussed their general concerns and questions relate d to this action, including :

• Allowable

- to

- Allowable Applicability Test. Several tribal representatives were

interested in under standing this applicability test.

• General Permits. A couple of tribal representatives were interested in knowing what a gener al permit is and if general permits could be developed for the hot mix asphalt plants source category.

• Adequate Resources to Implement the Program. A few tribal representatives were

concerned about the resources EPA has available to implement the Tribal N SR

rule

.

• Offsets. Several tribal representatives were interested in knowing how offsets will work on tribal lands and what options we had proposed to address the lack of availability of offsets in Indian country.
no. | date | by | chd | descriptionA | 03/10/08 | bdh | | Initial IssueB | 05/05/08 | bdh | | Incorporated SGSEvaporationCommentsand DriftC | 09/17/08 | bdh | | Incorporated SGSWabashCommentsRiverD | 02/10/09 | bdh | | Issued for Final ReportChlorineHot Spot CoolingPower Block andGasification BlockCondensateFlowNOx SteamCondensate Boiler Feedwater MS to CTFlow to Gasifier CRBoiler Feedwater Condensate FlowHRReturn Flow From GasifierPrecipitation EvaporationSteam FromGasifier BlockNon-recoverableLossesTo / From T295 S262 Service WaterTanks (note 7) (note 5) Hot Spot Cooling FilterCleaning Slurry fromS176 Quench / T144 T102 / T106ASU Blow Down RCC Distillate (note 4) C195 Precipitation (note 6) (note 6)PlantRunoffEvaporationTrenchSolidsWeirSee Note 3PlateSour Water SystemTo C240 column VentCausticOutfall 001Quench SprayWabashRiverRecycle SlurryTo / FromWaterS260 Sump(note 7)Nitrogen toPower BlockAirRecycle SlurryWaterHP Steam to Hot BoilerPower Block Feedwater Sour DistillateDry CakeWater(Off Site)OxygenNOTES:Losses1. FLOWS ARE SHOWN IN POUNDS PER HOURMILLING,AND ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST POUNDHEATING &Steam2. FLOWS ARE BASED ON AVERAGE DAILYFEEDING0 CONDITIONS.PetcokeCoalSTREAM ID FOR GASIFIER BLOCKSTREAM ID FOR POWER BLOCKCool3. THESE FLOWS MAY ALSO BE DIRECTED TOSourSUMP S105 INSTEAD OF THE TRENCH.ServiceSyngas4. STREAM NORMALLY FLOWS TO T106 BUTWaterWOULD GO TO S260 IN UPSET OR SPILLMakeupCONDITION.5. STREAM NORMALLY FLOWS TO T106 AND / ORSyngas toT100 BUT WOULD GO TO S260 IN UPSET ORS262Power BlockSPILL CONDITION.(note 5)Sweet6. INTERMITTENT FLOWS ASSOCIATED WITHSyngasACCIDENTAL SPILLS ONLY.Quench Slag7. INTERMITTENT FLOW.Water SlurryDESIGN CRITERIA:FUELDRY BULB TEMPWET BULB TEMPMolten SulfurRELATIVE HUMIDITYS176 Slurry(Off Site)(note 4)date detailedSlag Product(Off Site)designed checkedproject contractdrawing rev.---Dsheet 1 of 3 sheetsfile95F77F0Water Balance DiagramB. Hansen

COPYRIGHT © 2009 BY BURNS & McDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.Petcoke : SyngasWabash Valley Power AssociationWMB-01480272/10/2009B. Hansen N. LeighWabash Valley StationPRELIMINARYClaricone(Filtration)GravityFilterPetcoke / CoalStorageAreaCondenserHRSGSteamTurbineWastewaterHoldingPondStorm Water /PolishingPondKACPH121AT140Slag DewaterHoppersS260 SumpS105 SumpDIJ13NZYXVUTWSRQAB3430AAGASIFICATIONSLAGHANDLINGT102 -SLURRYSTORAGET140BUILDINGHIGH TEMPHEATRECOVERYACID GASREMOVALCHARREMOVALLTHRUSULFURRECOVERYUNIT512024AIRSEPARATIONUNIT12621C270 -DEGASSINGCOLUMN13111410982271518193C271 -NH3REMOVALCOLUMNC272 -COLUMNT100RCCEVAPORATORT-279CONCENTRATEDBRINET295A-FSTORAGETANKST106 -HEAVYSOLIDS2324252627282923031323335ZROTARYDRYERSDemineralizerSystemDemineralizerStorage TankCondensateHolding TankCondensatePolisherMAFADAEAGACAHCOSHYDROLYSISMOISTURIZATION16STClearwellCarbonFilterRiverCirculatingWaterHP IndustrialWaterLP IndustrialWaterBEGCoolingTowerOL17F
§ 26.46 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. In order to be admissible, any written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of the witness, in a manner that allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena the witness for cross-examination at the hearing.
§ 234.285 Waived title objections. The Commissioner shall not object to title by reason of the following matters: ( a ) Violations of a restriction based on race, color or creed, even where such restriction provides for a penalty of reversion or forfeiture of title or a lien for liquidated damage.
( b ) Easements for public utilities along one or more of the property lines, provided the exercise of the rights thereunder do not interfere with any of the buildings or improvements located on the subject property.
( c ) Encroachment on the subject property by improvements on adjoining property, provided such encroachments do not interfere with the use of any improvements on the subject property.
( d ) Variations between the length of the subject property lines as shown on the application for insurance and as shown by the record or possession lines, provided such variations do not interfere with the use of any of the improvements on the subject property.
( e ) Customary building or use restrictions for breach of which there is no reversion and which have not been violated to a material extent.
( f ) Federal tax liens and rights of redemption arising therefrom if the following conditions are observed. If the mortgagee acquires the property by foreclosure the mortgagee shall give notice to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of the foreclosure action. The Commissioner will not object to an outstanding right of redemption in IRS if: ( 1 ) The Federal tax lien was perfected subsequent to the date of the mortgage lien, and
( 2 ) the mortgagee has bid an amount sufficient to make the mortgagee whole if the property is in fact redeemed by the IRS.
[36 FR 24628, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 42 FR 29305, June 8, 1977]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 20, 2017

NO. 03

- 16

- 00044

- CV

Lennis L. Nichols, Appellant

v.

Brent Goodger and Patrice Goodger, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIE F JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES PURYEAR AND GOO DWIN

AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgmen t signed by the district court on December 15, 2015

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the district court’s judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the district court’s judgment

. The

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
### §5776. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5776 was editorially reclassified as section 11295 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.