alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5048. Joint funding; single non-Federal share requirement; grant or contract requirement waiver

Pursuant to regulations prescribed by the President, and to the extent consistent with the other provisions of this chapter, where funds are provided for a single project by more than one Federal agency to an agency or organization assisted under this chapter, the Federal agency principally involved may be designated to act for all in administering the funds provided, and, notwithstanding any other provision of law, in such cases, a single non-Federal share requirement may be established according to the proportion of funds advanced by each agency. When the principal agency involved is the Corporation, it may waive any grant or contract requirement (as defined by such regulations) under or pursuant to any law other than this chapter, which requirement is inconsistent with the similar requirements under or pursuant to this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title IV, §408, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 410; Pub. L. 103–82, title IV, §405(a)(8), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 920.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 394, known as the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4950 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–82 substituted "the Corporation" for "the ACTION Agency".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Apr. 4, 1994, see section 406(b) of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 8332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Authority of President under this section delegated to Director of Office of Management and Budget, see section 1 of Ex. Ord. No. 11893, eff. Dec. 31, 1975, 41 F.R. 1040, set out as a note under section 7103 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
Exhibit 11
                                     
                  Metris Companies Inc. and Subsidiaries
                     Computation of Earnings Per Share
              (in thousands, except share and per share data)
<TABLE>
                               Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                   September 30,            September 30,
                                 1997        1996         1997         1996
Primary:
<S>                          <C>  <C>    <C>   <C>    <C>  <C>     <C>  <C>
Net income                   $    10,537 $     5,802  $    27,994  $    14,696
Weighted average shares of                                
common stock outstanding (1)  19,225,000  15,966,667   19,225,000   15,966,667

Common stock equivalents (2)   1,069,275     540,676      992,949      519,036
                                      
Weighted average common and
 common equivalent shares     20,294,275  16,507,343   20,217,949   16,485,703

Net income per share         $       .52 $       .35  $      1.38  $       .89
                                     
Fully diluted:
Net income                   $    10,537 $     5,802  $    27,994  $    14,696
                                    
Weighted average shares of                        
 common stock outstanding (1)                                                                    
 
Common stock equivalents (2)   1,082,816     547,259    1,098,493      547,259

Weighted average common and
 common equivalent shares     20,307,816  16,513,926   20,323,493   16,513,926

Net income per share         $       .52 $       .35  $      1.38  $       .89
</TABLE>
(1) Assume shares outstanding as if the Company reorganization had occurred
at  the beginning of the periods shown.
(2) Based on the treasury stock method using the average market price for
primary earnings per share and the higher of the average or year-end market
price for fully diluted earnings per share.  Prior to October 25, 1996, the
initial public offering price of $16 was used.
#### Thomas C. Lo Presti, Respondent, v. City of Buffalo, Appellant.

—• Appeal dismissed unless records and briefs are filed and served on or before August 1, 1960. Respondent’s brief must be filed by August 26 if appeal is to be argued at September 1960 Term.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, David D. Wesselink, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Metris Companies Inc.
(the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting. 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of
directors of: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: May 7, 2004/s/ David D. WesselinkSignatureName:
    David D. WesselinkTitle:
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON DC

) AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF ) AMERICA, INC. d/b/a AIRLINES FOR ) AMERICA, et al., ) ) Complainants, ) 

### v. ) ) PORT OF PORTLAND, OREGON, ) ) Respondent. )

ORDER Docket 

### No. 16- 16- 04

On May 27,2016, counsel for Respondent filed a Motion for an Extension of Time under 14 Code ofFederal Register (CFR) § 16.19(e), requesting a 30 day extension of time until June 24, 2016 to file its Rebuttal to the Reply to the Answer to the Complaint. Counsel advised that additional time is needed to investigate, gather evidence and prepare a rebuttal to the new 300 pages introduced in the Reply. Counsel advised that the Complainants do not oppose an extension. Part 16 is intended to expedite substantially the handling and disposition ofairport-related complaints. 

### See Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airports (Retrospective Regulatory Review) Final Rule, 78 Federal Register (FR) 56135 (Sept. 12, 2013); Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings Final Rule , 61 FR 53998 (Oct. 16, 1996). Parties may file a written motion for an extension oftime under 14 CFR § 16.19( e). The Director may issue an order extending any time period prescribed where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration ofmatters before the agency. 14CFR§ 16.11(a). An extension oftime is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly , the Respondents' motion is hereby GRANTED. The Rebuttal shall be due on June 24,2016

.

Robin K. Hunt Acting Director, Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Date i ,

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 10, 2016, I have served a true copy ofthe foregoing ORDER on the following persons at the following addresses or email addresses: Counsel for Complainants: David Berg, Esq. Vice President & General Counsel Doug Mullen, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Air Transport Association ofAmerica, Inc. d/b/a Airlines for America 1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 1300 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 626-4234 Ema il: dbergt@,airlines.org ; dmullen@.airlines.org Roy Goldberg, Esq. Steptoe & Johnson LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 429

- 8028 Email: rgoldberg@steptoc.com Counsel for Respondents: Daniel Blaufus, Esq General Counsel Ian Whitlock, Esq. Deputy General Counsel Wendy Hain, Esq. Assistant General Counsel THE PORT OF PORTLAND 7200 NE Airport Way Portland, OR 97218 Email: dan.blaufus @ portofportland.com; ian.whitlock@portofportland.com; wendy.hain@portofportland.com Phone: 503-415-6062 Pablo 

### 0. Ni.iesch, Esq. SPIEGEL & MCDiARMID LLP 1875 Eye Street, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com Phone: 202-879-4000 Hand

-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (A CO-l 00)



# ~M-=

Office of Airport Compliance
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2848 

To extend the suspension of duty on reaction products of phosphorus 

trichloride with 1,1′-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on reaction products of 

phosphorus trichloride with 1,1′-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1- 

dimethylethyl)phenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTION PRODUCTS OF PHOSPHORUS TRI4 CHLORIDE WITH 1,1′-BIPHENYL AND 2,4- 

5 BIS(1,1-DIMETHYLETHYL)PHENOL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.07 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 reaction products of phosphorus trichloride with 1,1′- 

9 biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol) is amended 

10 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 
2 

•HR 2848 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40799 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ROBERTO GRIMALDO

- VEGA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 402

- 1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM : *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto Grimaldo

Vega has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Grimaldo

- Vega h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 21 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40799 Document: 00513012981 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015No. 14

- 40799

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-40799 Document: 00513012981 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015
```

[110th Congress Public Law 88]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ088.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 981]]

Public Law 110-88
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate a portion of Interstate Route 395 located in Baltimore, 
    Maryland, as ``Cal Ripken Way''. <<NOTE: Sept. 28, 2007 -  [H.R. 
                                3218]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The portion of Interstate Route 395 located in Baltimore, Maryland, 
beginning at the junction of Interstate Routes 395 and 95 and ending at 
Conway Street shall be known and designated as ``Cal Ripken Way''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the portion of Interstate Route 395 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cal 
Ripken Way''.

    Approved September 28, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3218:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Sept. 5, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 12, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 207.253 Termination by prepayment and voluntary termination. All rights under the insurance contract and all obligations to pay future insurance premiums shall terminate on the following conditions: ( a ) *Termination by prepayment.* Notice of the prepayment in full of the mortgage or loan shall be given to the Commissioner, on a form prescribed by the Commissioner, within 30 days from the date of prepayment. The insurance contract shall terminate, effective as of the date of prepayment. No adjusted premium charge shall be due the Commissioner on account of such termination by prepayment.
( b ) *Termination by voluntary agreement.* Receipt by the Commissioner of a written request, by the mortgagor and mortgagee or lender for termination of the insurance on the mortgage or loan, on a form prescribed by the Commissioner, accompanied by the original credit instrument for cancellation of the insurance endorsement and the remittance of all sums to which the Commissioner is entitled. The termination shall become effective as of the date these requirements are met. No voluntary termination charge shall be due the Commissioner on account of such termination by voluntary agreement.
( c ) Upon termination of the mortgage or loan insurance contract by a payment in full or by a voluntary termination, the Commissioner shall refund to the mortgagee or lender for the account of the mortgagor or borrower an amount equal to the pro rata portion of the current annual mortgage insurance premium theretofore paid, which is applicable to the portion of the year subsequent to ( 1 ) the date of the prepayment or
( 2 ) the effective date of the voluntary termination of the contract of insurance.
( d ) Notwithstanding any provision in the mortgage instrument, this section shall apply to all mortgage or loan insurance contracts terminated by either prepayment or voluntary termination where: ( 1 ) The mortgage is prepaid in full or
( 2 ) the Commissioner receives a request for voluntary termination, on or after May 1, 1972.
[37 FR 8662, Apr. 29, 1972]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., etal.,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))))

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ     C08-4118 BZ     C09-2016 BZ

BRIEFING ORDER

If Compass Vision has any objection to Maximus’s motion

to temporarily lift the stay as to plaintiffs Cleveland,

Daniels, Howe and Moore for purposes of summary judgment, IT

IS ORDERED to file those objections by July 9, 2010.  If a

reply or a hearing is necessary, the Court will issue a

further order. 

Dated: July 1, 2010

     Bernard Zimmerman

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\BRIEFING ORD RE MAXIMUS MOT TO LIFT

STAY.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ   Document 98   Filed 07/01/10   Page 1 of 1
### §7269c. Funding for Department of Energy activities not included in Fossil Energy account

In this Act and future Acts, up to 4 percent of program direction funds available to the National Energy Technology Laboratory may be used to support Department of Energy activities not included in this Fossil Energy account: Provided further, That in this Act and future Acts, the salaries for Federal employees performing research and development activities at the National Energy Technology Laboratory can continue to be funded from any appropriate DOE program accounts.

(Pub. L. 110–161, div. C, title III, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1958.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is div. C of Pub. L. 110–161, Dec. 26, 2007, 121 Stat. 1937, known as the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section appears under the headings "Department of Energy", "Energy Programs", and "Fossil Energy Research and Development" in title III of div. C of Pub. L. 110–161. It was enacted as part of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,263,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,871,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,148,751
<PP&E>                                      34,293,917
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,572,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              61,306,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,941,829
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        105
<COMMON>                                       118,809
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,826,423
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                61,306,222
<SALES>                                      5,757,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,708,157
<CGS>                                        2,197,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,969,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             924,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            711,665
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   711,665
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        


</TABLE>
#### § 201.43 Administrative reports and examinations.

The Secretary may call upon a lender for any reports deemed necessary in connection with the regulations in this part and may inspect the loan files, records, books and accounts of the lender as they pertain to the loans reported for insurance.
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 96 Filed 04/23/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 96 Filed 04/23/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 96 Filed 04/23/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:09-cv-01484-SI Document 96 Filed 04/23/10 Page 4 of 4
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2809

To temporarily suspend the duty on Carfentrazone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To temporarily suspend the duty on Carfentrazone.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CARFENTRAZONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.54 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Carfentrazone) is amended by striking ‘‘4.9%’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘free’’ and by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2809 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ