alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 24, 2015

Mr. Jason Hoffman

PO Box 330526

Nashville, TN 37203

Dear Mr. Hoffman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your March 2, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0533), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### § 213.277 Right and liability under the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund.

No mortgagor or mortgagee shall have any vested right in a credit balance in either the General Surplus Account or the Participating Reserve Account. No mortgagor or mortgagee shall be subject to any liability arising under the mutuality of the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund.
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 229 (Friday, November 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26180]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 2107]


Approval of Subzone Status; Lake Charles LNG Export Company, LLC; 
Lake Charles, Louisiana

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Act provides for ``. . . the 
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of subzones for specific uses;
    Whereas, the Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 87, has made application to the Board for the 
establishment of a subzone at the facility of Lake Charles LNG Export 
Company, LLC, located in Lake Charles, Louisiana (FTZ Docket B-50-2020, 
docketed August 5, 2020);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (85 FR 48503, August 11, 2020) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's memorandum, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves subzone status at the 
facility of Lake Charles LNG Export Company, LLC, located in Lake 
Charles, Louisiana (Subzone 87H), as described in the application and 
Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.13.

    Dated: November 19, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, 
Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2020-26180 Filed 11-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE SHAW,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

FEDERAL EXPRESS,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

No. C 09-00965 JCS

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service

of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been

delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the

calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2010 __________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00965-JCS Document 34 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 1
# TheAttorney General ofTexas February 22, 1982 MARK WHITE Attorney General
Supreme Court Building P.0. Box 12548 Austin, TX. 7871% 2540 5121475.2501 Telex 9101874.1367 Telecopier 5121475-0286
1607 Main St., Suite 1400 Dallas, TX. 75201.4709 2141742.8944
4824 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 ElPaso, TX. 79905.2793 9151533-3484
1220 Dallas Ave., Suite 202 Houston, TX. 77002.6986 7131650.0668
806 Broadway, Suite 312 Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 8061747.5238
4309 N.Tenth. Suite S McAllen. TX. 78501-1685 5121682-4547
200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 San Antonio. TX. 78205.2797 512/225-4191
An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer Honorable Ron Ems Dallam County Attorney County Courthouse P. 0.Box 561 Dalhart, Texas 79022 opinion No. m-448 Re: Authority of political subdivisions to jointly build andoperate a regional jail facility DearMr. Enns: You ask the following question: May Dallam County, Hartley County, and theCity of Dalhart jointly finance, construct, own and operate aregional jail facility? The Interlocal Cooperation Act provides that "[b]y resolution of the governing body, apolitical subdivision of the statemay contract with other political subdivisions of the state toparticipate in the ownership, construction, and operation of a regional jail facility." V.T.C.S. art. 4413(32c), §4(h)(l). The actdefines "local government" to include a county. a home rule city, a general law city, or "any other legally constituted political subdivision...or a combination of political subdivisions." V.T.C.S. art. 4413(32c), 93(l). Itisclear from the equation of "political subdivision" with a county and a city that the two counties and the citymay contract under section 4(h) to participate intheownership, construction andoperation of aregional jail facility. Section 4(h) sets out procedures for financing, locating, and operating the jail. If the counties and city you name follow these requirements, theyhave authority under theInterlocal Cooperation Act to jointly finance, construct, own, and operate a regional jail facility. Letter Advisory No. 133 (1977) considered the constitutionality of section 4(h) of the Interlocal Cooperation Act. The provision, pending legislation at the time, was held constitutional under article XI, section 2 of the Texas Constitution, which empowers the legislature toprovide by general law for jail construction. Thus, as determined in Letter Advisory No. 133, the constitution does not prevent political subdivisions from exercising the power granted by section 4(h) ofarticle 4413(32c), V.T.C.S.

p. 1544Honorable Ron Ems -Page 2 (NW-448)

SUMMARY The counties of Dallam and Hartley and the city of Dalhart may jointly finance, construct, ownand operate aregional jail facility under the authority of article 4413(32c), section 4(h), V.T.C.S.

Attorney General ofTexas JOHNW. FAINTER, JR. FirstAssistant Attorney General RICHARD E.GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by SusanL.Garrison Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE SusanL.Garrison, Chairman Rick Gilpin JimMoellinger

p. 1545
### §6351. Coordination of research and development of energy efficient technologies for industry

#### (a) In general

As part of the research and development activities of the Advanced Manufacturing Office of the Department of Energy, the Secretary of Energy (referred to in this section as the "Secretary") shall establish, as appropriate, collaborative research and development partnerships with other programs within the Department of Energy that—

(1) leverage the research and development expertise of those programs to promote early stage energy efficiency technology development;

(2) support the use of innovative manufacturing processes and applied research for development, demonstration, and commercialization of new technologies and processes to improve efficiency (including improvements in efficient use of water), reduce emissions, reduce industrial waste, and improve industrial cost-competitiveness; and

(3) apply the knowledge and expertise of the Advanced Manufacturing Office to help achieve the program goals of the other programs.

#### (b) Reports

Not later than 2 years after December 18, 2012, and biennially thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that describes actions taken to carry out subsection (a) and the results of those actions.

(Pub. L. 112–210, §6, Dec. 18, 2012, 126 Stat. 1519; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title VI, §6002, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2552.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the American Energy Manufacturing Technical Corrections Act, and not as part of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2020—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–260, in introductory provisions, substituted "Advanced Manufacturing Office" for "Industrial Technologies Program" and "Department of Energy" for "Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (including the Building Technologies Program), the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, and the Office of Science".

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 116–260, §6002(1), substituted "Advanced Manufacturing Office" for "Industrial Technologies Program".
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.2


                                CFO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A of ERF Wireless, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: August 26, 2005


By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     -----------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 242.56 Form of regulation.

As long as HUD is the insurer or holder of the mortgage, all mortgagors shall be regulated by HUD through the use of a regulatory agreement in a published format determined by HUD and such additional covenants and restrictions as may be determined necessary by HUD on a case-by-case basis. In addition, all mortgagors shall be subject to the provisions of 24 CFR part 24 and such other enforcement provisions as may be applicable. The mortgagor shall be subject to monitoring by HUD and its agents and contractors, on an ongoing basis for the life of the insured mortgage to ensure against the risk of default, and the mortgagor must make its financial records available to HUD and its agents and contractors upon request. In those cases in which the hospital facility is leased as permitted by § 242.72, the provisions of this section also shall apply to the lessee.

[72 FR 67546, Nov. 28, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 35923, June 25, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.74 Minimum property standards.

The requirements set forth in subpart S of this part apply to these programs, except for hospitals insured under section 242 of the Act and group practice facilities insured under title XI of the Act.
§ 19.7-3 Agreement with former spouse. ( a ) A spousal agreement between a participant or former participant and a former spouse may waive, reduce or increase the following benefits for a former spouse; ( 1 ) A pension under § 19.9;
( 2 ) A regular survivor annuity under § 19.11-2;
( 3 ) A supplemental survivor annuity under § 19.10-6;
( 4 ) A lump sum payment for regular or recall service under § 19.13. A spousal agreement shall also be used by a participant or former participant who has a former spouse on February 15, 1981, to elect a regular survivor annuity for such former spouse in accordance with § 19.11-2(e). An agreement to establish or increase any benefit for a former spouse entered into while the principal is married to someone else, must be signed and agreed to by both the spouse and the former spouse. An agreement affecting pension benefits may be filed at any time and will govern payments made after its acceptance by PER/ER/RET. An agreement affecting a regular survivor annuity must be filed before the end of the 12-month period after the divorce involving that former spouse or at the time of retirement, whichever occurs first, except as authorized in § 19.11-2(b) for persons retired on February 15, 1981, or in § 19.11-2(e) with respect to persons who were former spouses on February 15, 1981. This filing requirement stated in the Act makes it impossible to adjust, other than by court order, a regular survivor annuity for a former spouse when the divorce occurs after a retirement which occurs on or after February 15, 1981. The survivor annuity for the former spouse in such case is fixed by any spousal agreement entered into prior to the divorce, by § 19.11-2 or by court order. An agreement affecting supplemental survivor benefits or lump-sum payments must be filed before the supplemental annuity of the principal begins or lump-sum payment is made.
( b ) A spousal agreement between a participant or former participant and a former spouse may be filed with PER/ER/RET at any time in accordance with § 19.10-5 to provide an additional survivor annuity for the former spouse.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HomeCom
Communications, Inc. (the "Registrant") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Timothy R. Robinson, the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                                            By:   /s/ Timothy R. Robinson
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Name: Timothy R. Robinson
                                            Date: May 9, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to HomeCom Communications, Inc. and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:19:18-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Eliot Johnson et al., Appellants, v Peter B. Leone, Respondent.

[832 NYS2d 854]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John *V.*Centra, J.), entered August 7, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and granted in part defendant’s cross motion for partial summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Martoche, J.P, Smith, Lunn, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.
DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF 

A SUBSTITUTE TO SECTION 201 OF H.R. 5406, 

THE HELPING ENSURE ACCOUNTABILITY, LEADERSHIP, 

AND TRUST IN TRIBAL HEALTHCARE ACT 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute modifies section 201 of H.R. 

5406 by providing rules related to specific professions eligible for the exclusion under the 

proposal. 

The Chairman’s amendment provides that the exclusion shall apply only with respect to 

those individuals whose type of health profession or specialty would have qualified the 

individual to participate in the National Health Service Corps loan repayment program as of 

January 1, 2016. This limitation applies to any amount received pursuant to either the National 

Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program or the Indian Health Service loan repayment 

program. 

The Chairman’s amendment also modifies the effective date to apply to amounts received 

in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2016. 

The following presents the estimated Federal fiscal year budget effects of the Chairman’s 

amendment: 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26 

 

-3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -3 -16 -32 

NOTE: Details do not add to totals due to rounding. 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

September 14, 2016 

JCX-79-16
p.1 

OAR Box 1477 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

34) ll-J-25 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/31/2008 11:40:24 AM Sheet 34 of 36 
P.2 

Jennifer Greenamoyer 

05/03/2000 02:15 PM 

A-<*W-5* 

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Doug Bell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Dianne Byrne/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom 

Eagles/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, YvonneW 

Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Penny 

Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Diane 

McConkey/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Tom Kelly/DC/USEPA/US, Stuart 

Miles-McLean/DC/USEPA/US, Patrick Easter/DC/USEPA/US, Jennifer 

Vernon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Lapsley/DC/USEPA/US, Shirleym 

Howard/DC/USEPA/US, Dan Brown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jennifer 

Greenamoyer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Amanda 

Aldridge/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Brown/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Patricia Grim/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Arnold 

Medbery/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Austin.Perez@sba.gov, 

Jonathan.Pawlow@sba.gov, Peter_D._Eglinton@omb.eop.gov 

cc: 

Subject: Plastics: Material distributed by CFA 

For the record, the following six documents were distributed by CFA to each of the Panel members: 

1. Affordability of Capture and Control of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions From the Open 

Molding of Reinforced Plastics Composites. Prepared for the Composites Fabricators Assoc , April 

6, 2000 by Environomics Inc. 

2. Non-Economic Impacts on the Reinforced Plastics Composites Industry of Emission Control by 

Oxidizer Systems. Prepared for the Composites Fabricators Assoc , April, 2000 by Environmental 

Compliance and Risk Management Inc. 

3. Emission Control vs. Pollution Prevention for Open Molding of Composites: Incremental Benefits 

and Impacts, by D. Pipriro, Environmental Compliance and Risk Management, (no date) 

4. CFA Review of "Critical Issues" for Open Molding MACT - Revised April 18, 2000 (4 pages). 

5. Pollution Prevention for Open Molding of Composites. Robert Lacovara, Composite Fabricators 

Assoc , April 2000. 

6. Feasibility and Cost of the Capture and Control of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions form the 

Open Molding of Reinforced Plastics Composites. Prepared for the Composites Fabricators Assoc , 

April 6, 2000 by R. Haberiein, Engineering Environmental.
Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 70 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 70 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 70 Filed 07/08/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 70 Filed 07/08/10 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:09-cv-00380-RS Document 70 Filed 07/08/10 Page 5 of 5