alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 12.1 -**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, José Boisjoli, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F ofBombardier Recreational Products Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omittedpursuant to Transition Period provisions at Section III of Release 34-47986 ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission entitled "Management's Reports onInternal Control over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure inExchange Act Periodic Reports"] for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financialreporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

By: /s/ JOSÉ BOISJOLI **José Boisjoli****President and Chief Executive Officer**

Date: April 27, 2006
§ 203.440 Definitions. All of the definitions contained in § 203.50 of this subchapter shall apply to §§ 203.440 *et seq.* In addition the following terms shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Insured loan* means a loan which has been insured as evidenced by the issuance of an Insurance Certificate or by the endorsement of the note for insurance by the Commissioner.
( b ) *Contract of insurance* means the agreement evidenced by the issuance of an Insurance Certificate or by the endorsement of the Commissioner upon the note given in connection with an insured loan, incorporating by reference the regulations in §§ 203.440 *et seq.* and the applicable provisions of the Act.
( c ) *Insurance premium* means the loan insurance premium paid by the financial institution to the Commissioner in consideration of the contract of insurance.
( d ) *Beginning of amortization* means the date one month prior to the date of the first monthly payment to principal and interest.
( e ) *Maturity* means the date on which the loan indebtedness would be extinguished if paid in accordance with periodic payments provided for in the original note and security instrument.
( f ) *Debentures* means registered, transferable securities in book entry or certificated form which are valid and binding obligations, unconditionally guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 59 FR 49816, Sept. 30, 1994]
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Mac McConnell


Mac McConnell


Chief Financial Officer





November 8, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FINN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 10, 1905.)

Action by the city of New York against William E. Finn. A. I. Elkus, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent. No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                      1,077,669
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,214,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                  122,000
<INVENTORY>                                 2,631,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,904,082
<PP&E>                                      1,464,265 
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,339,476 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,144,964 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         939,804
<BONDS>                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0  
<PREFERRED>                                         0   
<COMMON>                                        4,419
<OTHER-SE>                                  5,200,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6,144,964 
<SALES>                                     1,702,009 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,927 
<CGS>                                       1,133,319 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               1,133,319 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              493,710 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,452 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                77,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                   30,745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            46,710
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0   
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   46,710 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .01 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .01
        


</TABLE>
#### Ogden J. Ross et al., Appellants, v. City of Rochester et al., Respondents.

Motion to resettle order *nunc pro tunc*as of December 21, 1959, granted. Order signed. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
### §§6235 to 6238. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(8)–(11), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2030

Section 6235, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §155, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 884; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288, related to the Early Storage Reserve.

Section 6236, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §156, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 885; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288, related to the Industrial Petroleum Reserve.

Section 6237, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §157, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 885; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288; Pub. L. 102–486, title XIV, §1405, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2995, related to the Regional Petroleum Reserve.

Section 6238, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §158, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 886; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288, related to a report on the establishment of Utility Reserves, Coal Reserves, Remote Crude Oil and Natural Gas Reserves.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LE WANG, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71976 

Agency No. A097-873-011 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

 Submitted June 11, 2019**

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Le Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal 

proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 14 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-71976 

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for 

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Wang’s second motion to 

reopen as untimely and numerically barred where he filed it nine years after the 

BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where he failed to demonstrate 

materially changed country conditions in China to qualify for an exception to the 

time and numerical limitations for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990-91 (evidence must be “qualitatively 

different” to warrant reopening). We reject Wang’s contention that the BIA did 

not properly evaluate all of his evidence.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen proceedings

sua sponte. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court 

has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the 

limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or 

constitutional error.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
### §9815. Small Business Administration and Department of Commerce economic development programs; regulations

(a)(1) Funds granted under this subchapter which are invested directly or indirectly, in a small investment company, local development company, limited small business investment company, or small business investment company licensee under section 681(d) 1 of title 15 shall be included as "private paid-in capital and paid-in surplus", "combined paid-in capital and paid-in surplus", and "paid-in capital" for purposes of sections 682, 683, and 696, respectively, of title 15.

(2) Not later than 90 days after August 13, 1981, the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, after consultation with the Secretary, shall promulgate regulations to ensure the availability to community development corporations of such programs as shall further the purposes of this subchapter, including programs under section 637(a) of title 15.

(b)(1) Areas selected for assistance under this subchapter shall be deemed "redevelopment areas" within the meaning of section 401 of the Publc 2 Works and Economic Development Act of 1965,1 shall qualify for assistance under the provisions of title I and title II of such Act, and shall be deemed to have met the overall economic development program requirements of section 202(b)(10) of such Act.

(2) Not later than 90 days after August 13, 1981, the Secretary of Commerce shall prescribe regulations which will ensure that community development corporations and cooperatives shall qualify for assistance and shall be eligible to receive such assistance under all such programs of the Economic Development Administration as shall further the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §626, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 496.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 681(d) of title 15, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was repealed by Pub. L. 104–208, div. D, title II, §208(b)(3)(A), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–742.

The Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is Pub. L. 89–136, Aug. 26, 1965, 79 Stat. 552, as amended. Titles I to VI of the Act of 1965 were repealed and new titles I to VI were enacted by Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3597. As so enacted, section 401 of the Act no longer defines "redevelopment areas" and section 202 of the Act no longer contains a subsec. (b). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3121 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original. Probably should be "Public".
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Emergent   Group  Inc.  (the
"registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),
I,  William  M.  McKay,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  registrant,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


November 13, 2006


/s/ William M. McKay
--------------------
William M. McKay
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Co-Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as createdby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officerof Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)                                     theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date: November 7, 2005 | /s/ Marty Albertson |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Marty Albertson             |
|   | Co-Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
### §1736a. Revolving fund derived from disposal of salvage timber

There is hereby established in the Treasury of the United States a special fund to be derived on and after October 5, 1992, from the Federal share of moneys received from the disposal of salvage timber prepared for sale from the lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior. The money in this fund shall be immediately available to the Bureau of Land Management without further appropriation, for the purposes of planning and preparing salvage timber for disposal, the administration of salvage timber sales, and subsequent site preparation and reforestation.

(Pub. L. 102–381, title I, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1376.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993, and not as part of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Distribution of Receipts

Title I of Pub. L. 102–381, 106 Stat. 1376, provided in part that: "Nothing in this provision [enacting this section] shall alter the formulas currently in existence by law for the distribution of receipts for the applicable lands and timber resources."
#### Tarver *et al. v.*Barber *et al.*

August 19, 1912.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Rawlings. Screven superior court. July 8, 1911.

*H. B. Strange, White & Lovett,*and *Brannen & Booth,*for plaintiffs. *H. A, Boykin,*for defendants.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where an administratrix applied to the court of ordinary for leave to sell all the real estate of the intestate, lying in a certain county, and. the order of the ordinary recited such petition and granted leave to sell all of the lands of the deceased in the county named, except the dower estate of the widow, and under this order the administratrix sold and conveyed the lands, in a subsequent attack upon the title claimed under the sale the order for sale was admissible, although, after the general grant of authority, it undertook to describe the lands of the deceased and did not do so accurately. *Clements*v. *Henderson,*4 *Ga.*148, 152 (48 Am. D. 216); *Davie*v. *McDaniel,*47 *Ga.*195; *Coggins*v. *Griswold,*64 *Ga.*323.

*(a)*Both sides claimed under the deceased, and neither attacked his title to the land in controversy, lying in the named county.

2. Although the ordinary may not sign an order granting an administrator leave to sell land, yet if it be entered on the minutes and they be signed by him, the order will not be held void for want of signature. *Smith*v. *Ross,*108 *Ga.*198 (33 S. E. 953).

3. Though some of the charges complained of may not have been perfectly accurate, there was nothing which required the grant of a new trial. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                       EXHIBIT 4
 
                           ABACUS DIRECT CORPORATION
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      JUNE 30,
                                                              -------------------------
                                                                 1997           1996
                                                              -----------    ----------
<S>                                                           <C>            <C>
Net income..................................................  $ 1,084,703    $  383,912
Average number of shares of common stock outstanding during
  the period................................................    9,543,628     9,046,527
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of stock options
  and grants (primary)......................................      667,607       486,920
                                                              -----------    ----------
                                                               10,211,235     9,533,447
Earnings per common share...................................  $      0.11    $     0.04
                                                              ===========    ==========
</TABLE>
Atheron Inc.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






RELEASE 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Rey V. Supera,
(“Supera”), for good and valuable consideration, including but not
limited to the consummation of a sale of his shares in Atheron, Inc.
(“ATHERON”), the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby
acknowledged, agrees as follows: 

1. Supera hereby remises, releases and forever discharges
ATHERON and its assigns, employees and servants, and, where applicable, the
executors, administrators, successors and assigns from any and all manner of
action and actions, cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of
money, claims, demands and obligations whatsoever, at law or in equity, which
Supera may have had or now have or which her assigns, receivers,
receiver-managers, trustees, affiliates, and, where applicable, the heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns of her hereafter can, shall or
may have existing up to the present time by reason of any matter cause or thing
whatsoever relating to or arising out of the relationship between the Supera and
ATHERON relating to, arising out of or in connection with any and all dealings
between the parties to the date hereof. 

2. Notwithstanding the above provision and for greater
clarification, this Release does not apply to any claims that may arise after
the date of this Release. 

3. It is understood and agreed that Supera shall not commence
or continue any claims or proceedings against anyone in respect of anything
hereby released which may result in a claim or proceedings against ATHERON. If
any such claim or proceeding results in any claim or proceeding against ATHERON,
then the party bringing such claim or proceeding shall indemnify and save
harmless the other party from all resulting liabilities, obligations and costs.


4. Supera hereby represents that he is the only party entitled
to the consideration expressed in this Release, and has not assigned any right
of action released hereby to any other firm, corporation or person. 

5. Supera acknowledges that he has read this document and fully
understands the terms of this Release, and acknowledges that this Release has
been executed voluntarily after receiving independent legal advice. 

6. This Release is governed by the laws of Nevada, and the
parties attorn to the jurisdiction of the Courts of Nevada with regard to any
dispute arising out of this Release.

7. Execution and delivery of this document by fax shall
constitute effective execution and delivery. Execution of this document by a
corporation shall be effective notwithstanding that its corporate seal is not
affixed hereto. 

DATED for reference November 5, 2010. 

	 	/s/Rey V. Supera 
	 	REY V. SUPERA
§ 180.715 Enforcement of final decision. ( a ) *Enforcement by HUD.* Following the issuance of a final decision, the General Counsel may petition the appropriate United States Court of Appeals for the enforcement of the final decision and for appropriate temporary relief or restraining order in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 3612(j).
( b ) *Enforcement by others.* If no petition for review has been filed within 60 days after the date of issuance, and the General Counsel has not sought enforcement of the final decision as described in paragraph (a) of this section, any person entitled to relief under the final decision may petition the appropriate United States Court of Appeals for the enforcement of the final decision in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 3612(m).
Medicine Bow

62 _R6IW 6

seeeeee Continental Divide National Scenic Trail a a — $e
North Platte Kilometers
GB Rawlins OHV o 5 10 20 30 40 50
a
Miles
Map 2-16

Special Recreation Management Areas
Alternative 3

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM