alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, John W. Elias, ChiefExecutive Officer of Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | August 8, 2006     | /s/ John W. Elias |
|--------|-------------------------|-------------------|
|   | John W. Elias           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ACI Telecentrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Russell Jackson, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.




Dated: /s/ June 3, 2003               By: /s/ RUSSELL JACKSON
       -------------------                -------------------------------
                                      Russell Jackson
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### § 401.10 General rule.

The Commission may, at any time, adopt any procedure which it deems expedient and necessary to carry out the true intent and meaning of the Treaty.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—EXCHANGE AND AMENDMENT OF FARM UNITS
### §7269. Transfer of funds

The Secretary, when authorized in an appropriation Act, in any fiscal year, may transfer funds from one appropriation to another within the Department, except that no appropriation shall be either increased or decreased pursuant to this section by more than 5 per centum of the appropriation for such fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §659, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 604.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Costs of Defined Benefit Pension Plans for Contractor Employees

Pub. L. 111–85, title III, §308, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2872, provided that:

"(a) In any fiscal year in which the Secretary of Energy determines that additional funds are needed to reimburse the costs of defined benefit pension plans for contractor employees, the Secretary may transfer not more than 1 percent from each appropriation made available in this and subsequent Energy and Water Development Appropriation Acts to any other appropriation available to the Secretary in the same Act for such reimbursements.

"(b) Where the Secretary recovers the costs of defined benefit pension plans for contractor employees through charges for the indirect costs of research and activities at facilities of the Department of Energy, if the indirect costs attributable to defined benefit pension plan costs in a fiscal year are more than charges in fiscal year 2008, the Secretary shall carry out a transfer of funds under this section.

"(c) In carrying out a transfer under this section, the Secretary shall use each appropriation made available to the Department in that fiscal year as a source for the transfer, and shall reduce each appropriation by an equal percentage, except that appropriations for which the Secretary determines there exists a need for additional funds for pension plan costs in that fiscal year, as well as appropriations made available for the Power Marketing Administrations, the title XVII [probably means title XVII of Pub. L. 109–58 (42 U.S.C. 16511 et seq.)] loan guarantee program, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, shall not be subject to this requirement.

"(d) Each January, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate on the state of defined benefit pension plan liabilities in the Department for the preceding year.

"(e) This transfer authority does not apply to supplemental appropriations, and is in addition to any other transfer authority provided in this or any other Act. The authority provided under this section shall expire on September 30, 2015.

"(f) The Secretary shall notify the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate in writing not less than 30 days in advance of each transfer authorized by this section."
§ 203.285 Fifteen-year mortgages: Calculation of up-front and annual MIP on or after December 26, 1992. ( a ) *Up-front.* Any mortgage for a term of 15 or fewer years executed on or after December 26, 1992, that is an obligation of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, and any mortgage executed on or after December 27, 2005, to be insured under sections 203(k) and 234(c) of the National Housing Act, shall be subject to a single up-front premium payment established and collected by the Commissioner in an amount not exceeding 2.0 percent of the amount of the original insured principal obligation of the mortgage. Upon termination of insurance by voluntary agreement, or upon payment in full of the principal obligation of the mortgage before the maturity date, the Commissioner shall refund all of the unearned premium charges paid on the mortgage pursuant to this paragraph (a).
( b ) *Annual.* In addition to the premium under paragraph (a) of this section, the Commissioner shall establish and collect annual premium payments in amounts not exceeding the following percentages of the remaining insured principal balance (excluding the portion of the remaining balance attributable to the premium collected under paragraph (a) of this section) for the following periods: ( 1 ) For any mortgage involving an original principal obligation (excluding any premium collected under paragraph (a) of this section) that is less than 90 percent of the appraised value of the property (as of the date the mortgage is accepted for insurance), no annual premium will be charged.
( 2 ) For any mortgage involving an original principal obligation (excluding any premium collected under paragraph (a) of this section) that is greater than or equal to 90 percent of such value, but less than or equal to 95 percent of such value, an annual premium not exceeding .25 percent shall be collected for the first four years of the mortgage term.
( 3 ) For any mortgage involving an original principal obligation (excluding any premium collected under paragraph (a) of this section) that is greater than 95 percent of such value, an annual premium not exceeding .25 percent shall be collected for the first eight years of the mortgage term.
( c ) *Applicability of certain provisions.* The provisions of §§ 203.261, 203.262, 203.264, 203.265, 203.266, 203.267, 203.268, 203.269, 203.280, 203.282, 203.284(c), and 203.284(g) are applicable to mortgages subject to premiums under this section.
( d ) *Exception for streamline refinance.* This section shall not apply to any mortgage insured pursuant to § 203.43(c) if the mortgage to be refinanced was executed before July 1, 1991 and the new mortgage is executed on or after December 26, 1992.
[58 FR 41004, July 30, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 34138, June 30, 1995; 61 FR 37801, July 19, 1996; 70 FR 37156, June 28, 2005]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES RIDGEWAY, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WAL-MART STORES INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 08-cv-05221-SI 

ORDER REFERRING DISCOVERY 

DISPUTE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Re: Dkt. Nos. 209, 210

The Court REFERS the pending discovery dispute to a Magistrate Judge for resolution. 

Dkt. Nos. 209, 210.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2015

________________________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 214 Filed 06/19/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                           4,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,543
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,869
<INVENTORY>                                     13,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,811
<PP&E>                                          75,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,459
<BONDS>                                        125,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                   (127,690)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,398
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,986
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   5,800
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,841)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)


</TABLE>
#### § 241.261 Payment of insurance benefits.

All of the provisions of § 207.259 of this chapter relating to insurance benefits shall apply to multifamily loans insured under this subpart.

[80 FR 51469, Aug. 25, 2015]
### Summary of Phone Conversation:

On September 13, 2013, I called Dan Inouye, Chief of the Monitoring and Planning Branch, Washoe County Health District, Air Quality Management Division to discuss the District’s interpretation of “ N ational A mbient Air Standards ” in NSR

- related SIP Rule 030.010. Dan confirmed that the District interprets the reference to “National Ambient Air Standard s ” in SIP Rule 030.010 as a reference to the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards

. He also confirmed that Table 5 (“National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)”) which is found at the back of the District’s air pollution rules and regulations and which has not been updated since 1990, is intended for informational purposes only and is not intended to define the r eference to the “National Ambient Air Standards” in SIP rule 030.010. I indicated that I believed that “Table 5” had not been incorporated into the Washoe County portion of the Nevada SIP.
Prepared by : Jeff Wehling, ORC, EPA Region IX

Date : September 13, 2013
### §1181b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1181b was editorially reclassified as section 2602 of this title.
Case 3:09-cv-00454-WHA Document 40 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 3
May 6, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-00454-WHA Document 40 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-00454-WHA Document 40 Filed 05/06/10 Page 3 of 3
### §9873. Payments under allotments to States

The Secretary shall make payments, as provided by section 6503(a) of title 31, to each State from its allotments under section 9872 of this title from amounts appropriated under section 9871 of this title.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §670C, as added Pub. L. 98–558, title I, §109, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2880.)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marguerite Kaczmarek, Respondent, v Village of Sloan et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed July 7, 1976, which reversed a referee’s decision allowing the claim against the Special Fund. The board found "the employer had no knowledge of pre-existing physical impairment prior to the accidents of May 21, 1970 and August 15, 1970 and claimant’s death was due solely to the accident. The provisions of section 15-8 (e) of the Workmen’s Compensation Law do not apply.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondents filing briefs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Staley, Jr. and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
Swanson, Brian (OST) &0T> 0«>'r- l<<^b- l<tog> 

From: Mickey Bowman [mbowma@gulfstreamair.com] 

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:29 AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Cc: 'Dave Hacl<ett' 

Subject: Re Gulfstream International Airlines Bids for Montana and Arizona/ New Mexico Cities 

Gentlemen, 

I wanted to make you aware of potential future filings by Gulfstream depending on how several pending Essential Air 

Service contracts are awarded. As you know, Gulfstream has tendered submissions in recent cases involving both seven 

cities in Montana: Glasgow, Glendive, Havre, Lewiston, Miles City, Sidney and Wolf Point; as well as seven cities in 

Arizona and New Mexico: Carlsbad, Clovis, Silver City, Show Low, Page, Prescott and Kingman. We have bid these 

packages in such as way as to allow for sufficient mass to justify the establishment of these remote operations, relative to 

our current system. While we welcome the challenge of establishing such operations and have no doubt in our ability to 

deliver a quality product, we feel it is only prudent to limit ourselves in terms of logistical reach. 

Gulfstream has received the endorsement of the Montana Essential Air Service Committee and the Montana Department 

of Transportation and we are very hopeful that your offices will concur with those endorsements and award those seven 

Montana routes to Gulfstream. Please be advised that should that situation occur, Gulfstream would withdraw its bids for 

service to the Arizona and New Mexico markets. We simply do not want to stretch ourselves too far, too quickly. We felt 

it only fair to advise your office of this possible scenario in advance. Please also understand that should Gulfstream not 

be awarded the Montana contracts, our bids for the Arizona and New Mexico cities would not be retracted and remain for 

your and the community's consideration. 

Should you have any further questions relating to these bids please don't hesitate to contact me directly. 

Very truly yours, 

Mickey Bowman 

Vice President of Corporate Development 

Gulfstream International Airlines 

(270)689-2180 Office 

(270)303-8719 Cell 

mbowma@aulfstreamair.com
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICOLAE ENACHE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70988

Agency No. A075-006-703

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Nicolae Enache, a native and citizen of Romania, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) deportation order. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a continuance, and 

FILED

JUL 12 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70988

de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. SandovalLuna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). We deny the

petition for review. 

The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying a continuance because Enache

did not demonstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion

for continuance for good cause shown). It follows that Enache cannot establish the

IJ violated his due process rights. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.

2000) (requiring error for a due process violation).

The BIA correctly determined that Enache failed to demonstrate prejudice,

so his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails. See Rojas-Garcia v.

Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (to prevail on an ineffective assistance

of counsel claim, a petitioner must demonstrate prejudice). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### §7544. State grants

The Administrator is authorized to make grants to appropriate State agencies in an amount up to two-thirds of the cost of developing and maintaining effective vehicle emission devices and systems inspection and emission testing and control programs, except that—

(1) no such grant shall be made for any part of any State vehicle inspection program which does not directly relate to the cost of the air pollution control aspects of such a program;

(2) no such grant shall be made unless the Secretary of Transportation has certified to the Administrator that such program is consistent with any highway safety program developed pursuant to section 402 of title 23; and

(3) no such grant shall be made unless the program includes provisions designed to insure that emission control devices and systems on vehicles in actual use have not been discontinued or rendered inoperative.

Grants may be made under this section by way of reimbursement in any case in which amounts have been expended by the State before the date on which any such grant was made.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title II, §210, formerly §209, as added Pub. L. 90–148, §2, Nov. 21, 1967, 81 Stat. 502; renumbered and amended Pub. L. 91–604, §§8(a), 10(b), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1694, 1700; Pub. L. 95–95, title II, §204, Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 754.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1857f–6b of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 210 of act July 14, 1955, was renumbered section 211 by Pub. L. 91–604 and is classified to section 7545 of this title.

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–95 inserted provision allowing grants to be made by way of reimbursement in any case in which amounts have been expended by States before the date on which the grants were made.

1970—Pub. L. 91–604, §10(b), substituted provisions authorizing the Administrator to make grants to appropriate State agencies for the development and maintenance of effective vehicle emission devices and systems inspection and emission testing and control programs, for provisions authorizing the Secretary to make grants to appropriate State air pollution control agencies for the development of meaningful uniform motor vehicle emission device inspection and emission testing programs.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–95 effective Aug. 7, 1977, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 406(d) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as a note under section 7401 of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2871

To designate the John L. Burton Trail in the Headwaters Forest Reserve, 

California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2005

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. BACA, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. 

BERMAN, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. COSTA, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. FILNER, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. HONDA, 

Mr. LANTOS, Ms. LEE, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. 

MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. PELOSI, Ms. ROYBALALLARD, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ

of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. STARK, Mrs. 

TAUSCHER, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. WATSON, Ms. WATERS, 

Mr. WAXMAN, and Ms. WOOLSEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To designate the John L. Burton Trail in the Headwaters 

Forest Reserve, California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN L. BURTON TRAIL. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘John L. Burton Trail Act’’. 
2

•HR 2871 IH 

1 (b) DESIGNATION OF JOHN L. BURTON TRAIL.—Any 

2 trail authorized by the final management plan under sec3 tion 501(i) of Public Law 105–33 (111 Stat. 1613) for 

4 Headwaters Forest Reserve, California, that is con5 structed to provide access to the southern end of the 

6 Headwaters Grove near the existing Salmon Trailhead 

7 shall be known as the ‘‘John L. Burton Trail’’.

Æ
Exhibit
10.27

    Equity
Transfer Agreement

    Of

    Jilin
Province Yongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd.

    


    (English
Translation)

    


    Party A:
Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical Co., Ltd.

    Party B:
LIU, Yongxin

    


    Party A,
who is holding an amount of RMB 2,500,000 equity interest or 100%  of
the registered capital of Jilin Province Yongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd., hereby
agrees to transfer capital contribution of RMB 650,000 to Party B.

    


    Hereby
agreed.

    


    Signatures

    


    Party A:
Changchun Yongxin Dirui Medical Co., Ltd. (seal)

    Party B:
/s/ LIU, Yongxin

    


    Jilin
Province Yongxin Chain Drugstore Ltd. (Seal)

    


    Date: May
17, 2010