alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1305.7 Final determination.

The General Counsel makes the final determination on demands to employees for production of official documents and information or testimony. All final determinations are within the sole discretion of the General Counsel. The General Counsel will notify the requester and the Court or other authority of the final determination, the reasons for the grant or denial of the demand, and any conditions that the General Counsel may impose on the release of documents, or on the testimony of an employee. When in doubt about the propriety of granting or denying a demand for testimony or documents, the General Counsel should consult with the Department of Justice.
#### Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York, Respondent, v Peter Gonzalez et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[832 NYS2d 827]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered December 16, 2005 in Schoharie County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

The record in this case fully supports Supreme Court’s determination that the failure of defendants Peter Gonzalez and Francesca Gonzalez to pay real estate taxes from 1998 through 2001 warranted an award of summary judgment on this mortgage foreclosure action.*

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

*

 Supreme Court incorrectly noted that said defendants entered into a payment arrangement with the Schoharie County Treasurer on May 23, 2005 for the years 2003, 2004 and 2005. By letter dated October 7, 2005, from the Office of the County Treasurer, it appears that said defendants’ monthly payment agreement only covers the town and county taxes for the years 2003 and 2004.
### §5157. Penalties

#### (a) Misuse of funds

Any person who knowingly misapplies the proceeds of a loan or other cash benefit obtained under this chapter shall be fined an amount equal to one and one-half times the misapplied amount of the proceeds or cash benefit.

#### (b) Civil enforcement

Whenever it appears that any person has violated or is about to violate any provision of this chapter, including any civil penalty imposed under this chapter, the Attorney General may bring a civil action for such relief as may be appropriate. Such action may be brought in an appropriate United States district court.

#### (c) Referral to Attorney General

The President shall expeditiously refer to the Attorney General for appropriate action any evidence developed in the performance of functions under this chapter that may warrant consideration for criminal prosecution.

#### (d) Civil penalty

Any individual who knowingly violates any order or regulation issued under this chapter shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §314, as added Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §105(k), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4694.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5157, Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §317, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 152, related to criminal and civil penalties, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–707, §105(k).

A prior section 314 of Pub. L. 93–288 was classified to section 5154 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–707.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

The Motion is attached as an exhibit to the Request and, as a result, plaintiffs were

served with the Motion on May 20, 2010.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALPHONSO OLIPHANT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-08-5048 MMC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR ORDER SHORTENING

TIME

Before the Court is defendants’ Request for an Order Shortening Time (“Request”),

filed May 20, 2010, by which defendants seek to have their “Motion to Bifurcate and Sever”

(“Motion”) heard at the June 8, 2010 Pretrial Conference. Plaintiffs have not filed

opposition to the Request.

Because the relief sought in the Motion is in the nature of a motion in limine, the

Court finds it appropriate to consider the Motion at the Pretrial Conference.

Accordingly, the Request is hereby GRANTED, and the Court sets the following

briefing schedule on the Motion:

1. The Motion shall be filed no later than Wednesday, May 26, 2010.1

Case 3:08-cv-05048-MMC Document 91 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Any opposition to the Motion shall be filed no later than Tuesday, June 1, 2010.

3. Consistent with the Court’s Pretrial Preparation Order, which does not provide for

the filing of replies in support of motions in limine, no reply shall be allowed.

4. The Motion shall be heard at the June 8, 2010 Pretrial Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 25, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05048-MMC Document 91 Filed 05/25/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.40

AMENDMENT  TO THE  1997 EQUITY PARTICIPATION PLAN  OF  GUITAR CENTER, INC.

Pursuant to the authority reserved to the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Guitar Center, Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of State of Delaware, under Section 10.2 of the 1997 Equity Participation Plan of Guitar Center, Inc. (as amended, the
"Plan"), the Board hereby further amends the Plan as follows.





*
* * * * * * * * *

I
hereby certify that the foregoing amendment to the Plan was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of Guitar Center, Inc., effective as of March 24, 2003.

| |  | /s/BRUCE L. ROSSBruce L. Ross
Secretary |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
data for the three month period ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements. Dollar amounts in thousands,
except per share.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,884
<PP&E>                                           9,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,495
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,102
<SALES>                                          4,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,082
<CGS>                                            2,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (177)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,592)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
§ 236.4 Guarantee eligibility. ( a ) Eligible Notes only are guaranteed hereunder. Notes in order to achieve Eligible Note status: ( 1 ) Must be signed on behalf of the Borrower, manually or in facsimile, by a duly authorized representative of the Borrower;
( 2 ) Must contain a certificate of authentication manually executed by a Fiscal Agent whose appointment by the Borrower is consented to by USAID in the Fiscal Agency Agreement; and
( 3 ) Shall be approved and authenticated by USAID by either: ( i ) The affixing by USAID on the Notes of a guarantee legend incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID or
( ii ) The delivery by USAID to the Fiscal Agent of a guarantee certificate incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of USAID by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of USAID.
( b ) The authorized USAID representatives for purposes of the regulations in this part whose signature(s) shall be binding on USAID shall include the USAID Chief and Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Administrator and Deputy, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education, and Environment, Director and Deputy Director, Office of Development Credit, and such other individual(s) designated in a certificate executed by an authorized USAID Representative and delivered to the Fiscal Agent. The certificate of authentication of the Fiscal Agent issued pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall, when manually executed by the Fiscal Agent, be conclusive evidence binding on USAID that an Eligible Note has been duly executed on behalf of the Borrower and delivered.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS, LLC, ET

AL.,

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C09-1550 JSW (JCS)

ORDER TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE STATEMENTS IN .PDF

FORMAT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in addition to the submission of paper copy of settlement

conference statements to chambers, each party shall submit their confidential settlement conference

statements in .pdf format and email their statement to JCSPO@cand.uscourts.gov.

All other provisions of this Court's original Notice and Settlement Conference Order remain

in effect.

Dated: February 8, 2010

_______________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01550-JSW Document 95 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 1
### §6864e. Hiring

The Secretary may, as the Secretary determines appropriate, encourage entities receiving funding from the Federal Government or from a State through a weatherization program under section 6863 of this title or section 6864 of this title, to prioritize the hiring and retention of employees who are individuals described in section 6864d(a)(5) of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title IV, §414E, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. Z, title I, §1011(f)(1), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2446.)
### §270–11. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789

Section, acts Mar. 8, 1922, ch. 96, §1, 42 Stat. 415; Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–725, §1, 72 Stat. 730, related to entry on land containing coal, oil, or gas.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, §703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789, provided that the repeal made by section 703(a) is effective on and after tenth anniversary of date of approval of this Act, Oct. 21, 1976.

#### Savings Provision

Repeal by Pub. L. 94–579 not to be construed as terminating any valid lease, permit, patent, etc., existing on Oct. 21, 1976, see section 701 of Pub. L. 94–579, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### § 232.530 Disbursement of proceeds.

At the time of endorsement for insurance of the note by the Commissioner, the entire principal amount of the note shall have been disbursed to the borrower or to his creditors for his account and with his consent.
### §5197d. Applicability of subchapter

The provisions of this subchapter shall be applicable to the United States, its States, Territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia, and their political subdivisions.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title VI, §625, as added Pub. L. 103–337, div. C, title XXXIV, §3411(a)(3), Oct. 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 3110.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2259 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–337, §3412(a).
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,958

EX PARTE ROLANDO RAMIREZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 10-59837-X 

 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 6 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because the plea agreement cannot be

followed. 

The trial court determined that Applicant pled guilty pursuant to an agreement that this

sentence would run concurrently with a federal sentence. The federal judgment requires the federal

sentence to begin when the state sentence expires. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Huerta,
2

692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. F-10-59837-X in the criminal district court

number 6 of Dallas County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of

Dallas County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any

necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: January 30, 2013

Do not publish
This document is copyrighted, and is available upon request as part of the hard-copy administrative record
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals

April 29, 2009

Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics

On April 29, 2009, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

participated in a meeting to update interested members from the National Tribal Air 

Association (NTAA) on the status of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and 

Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the: 

• Proposed schedule for finalizing the rule
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77322-77323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28139]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint; Notice of Meeting

ACTION: Notification of Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee January 
2005 public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 108-15, sec. 103, the United States 
Mint announces the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) public 
meeting scheduled for January 25, 2005. The purpose of the meeting is 
to advise the Secretary of the Treasury on designs pertaining to the 
coinage of the United States and for other purposes.
    Date: January 25, 2005--Washington, DC.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Location: United States Mint; 801 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC; 
2nd floor Conference Room A.
    Subject: Consider state commemorative quarter-dollar coin design 
candidates and other business.
    Interested persons should call 202-354-7502 for the latest update 
on meeting time and location.
    Public Law 108-15 established the CCAC to:
    [dec222] Advise the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or 
design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, 
congressional gold medals, and national and other medals.
    [dec222] Advise the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the 
events, persons, or places to be commemorated by the issuance of 
commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the 
year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.
    [dec222] Make recommendations with respect to the mintage level for 
any commemorative coin recommended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madelyn Simmons Marchessault; United 
States Mint Liaison to the CCAC; 801 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20220, or call 202-354-6669.
    Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the 
CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by fax to the following 
number: 202-756-6830.

    Authority: Public Law 108-15 (April 23, 2003).

[[Page 77323]]

    Dated: December 20, 2004.
Henrietta Holsman Fore,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 04-28139 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
```
Exhibit 99.2


    Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
                ------------------------------------------------

     I, David D. Wesselink, Vice Chairman and Principal Financial Officer of
Metris Companies Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metris Companies
Inc.


                                         /s/ David D. Wesselink
                                         ----------------------
                                         David D. Wesselink
                                         Vice Chairman
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)
                                         November 14, 2002
### §§9863 to 9865. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §391(w), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4025

Section 9863, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §664, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §204(a), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1245, authorized financial assistance for research regarding Follow Through programs and approaches.

A prior section 9863, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §664, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 509, related to grants or contracts for research, demonstration, and pilot projects, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §204(a), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1245.

Section 9863a, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §664A, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §204(a), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1245, related to technical assistance and training.

Section 9863b, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §664B, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §204(a), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1246, authorized grants to entities which operate, or previously operated, effective Follow Through programs.

Section 9863c, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §664C, as added Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §204(a), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1246, related to grant to establish national clearinghouse on Follow Through programs.

Section 9864, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §665, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 510; Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §205, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1246, related to announcement of research and evaluation contracts.

Section 9865, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §666, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 510; Pub. L. 101–501, title II, §206, Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1247, related to continuing evaluation of programs under this subchapter.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of-- Master Marine, Inc. Under ContractNo. W912P8-18-P-0029 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 62044

A. Clay Rankin, Esq.

Rankin Law LLC Fairhope, AL Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Thomas M. Taff, Jr., Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: September 12, 2019

dministrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62044, Appeal ofMaster Marine, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2140

LATRESE D. SCOTT-BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM COHEN, Secretary of Defense,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-00-3570-AW)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latrese D. Scott-Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Frank Corcoran,

Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer Lilore Huesman, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Latrese D. Scott-Brown appeals from the district court’s

orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants as to some

claims and a monetary judgment based upon a jury verdict in her

favor as to other claims in this action pursuant to Title VII of

the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Scott-Brown v. Cohen, No. CA00-3570-AW (D. Md. Aug. 14, 2001; July 15, 2002; filed July 18 and

entered July 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 236.901 Audit.

Where a State or local government receives interest reduction payments under section 236(b) of the National Housing Act or is the mortgagor of a mortgage insured or held by the Commissioner under this part, it shall conduct audits in accordance with HUD audit requirements at 2 CFR part 200, subpart F.

[58 FR 37813, July 13, 1993, as amended at 80 FR 75936]