alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I ) 

SERVED: MAY 15, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In The Matter Of: 

NORTHEASTERN 

AVIATION CORPORATION 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0812 

Case No. 2012EA110028 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST 

FOR MODIFICATION OF LITIGATION DATES 

On April 17, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. Among 

other things, this Order set a May 1, 2015 deadline for the parties to serve each other with initial 

disclosure, and a May 5, 2015 deadline for the parties to initiate general discovery. 

On May 14, 2015, the FAA filed the Agency's Request for Modification of Order Setting 

Litigation Dates and Procedures ("Request"). The FAA asserted that "the parties have conferred 

and agreed" to modify the April 17, 2015 Order as described in the Request. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6), (8), and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, 

regulations, statutory authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Agency's Request for Modification of Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures 

is granted. The new deadline for Initial Disclosures is May 15, 2015. The new deadline 

to initiate general discovery is May 15, 2015. 

2. All other dates contained in the April 17, 2015 Order Setting Litigation Dates and 

Procedures, not explicitly altered by this Order, are reconfirmed. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Office of Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz II 

Respondent's Counsel 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 1200 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-659-6619 

FAX: 202-659-6699 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0812 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### §3797j. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797j was editorially reclassified as section 10561 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 203.43a Eligibility of mortgages covering housing in certain neighborhoods. ( a ) A mortgage financing the repair, rehabilitation, construction, or purchase of property located in an older declining urban area shall be eligible for insurance under this subpart subject to compliance with the additional requirements of this section.
( b ) The mortgage shall meet all of the requirements of this subpart, except such requirements as are judged to be not applicable on the basis of the following determinations to be made by the Commissioner: ( 1 ) That the conditions of the area in which the property is located prevent the application of certain eligibility requirements of this subpart.
( 2 ) That the area is reasonably viable, and there is a need in the area for adequate housing for families of low and moderate income.
( 3 ) That the mortgage to be insured is an acceptable risk.
( c ) Mortgages complying with the requirements of this section shall be insured under this subpart pursuant to section 223(e) of the National Housing Act. Such mortgages shall be insured under and be the obligation of the Special Risk Insurance Fund.
( d ) For restrictions against approving mortgage insurance for a certain category of newly legalized alien, see 24 CFR part 49.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 55 FR 18493, May 2, 1990]
### §9675. Applicability of securities laws

#### (a) Ownership interests

The ownership interests of members of a risk retention group shall be considered to be—

(1) exempted securities for purposes of section 77e of title 15 and for purposes of section 78l of title 15; and

(2) securities for purposes of the provisions of section 77q of title 15 and the provisions of section 78j of title 15.

#### (b) Investment Company Act

A risk retention group shall not be considered to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.).

#### (c) Blue sky law

The ownership interests of members in a risk retention group shall not be considered securities for purposes of any State blue sky law.

(Pub. L. 96–510, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 99–499, title II, §210(a), formerly §210, Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1719; renumbered §210(a), Pub. L. 99–563, §11(c)(1), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3177.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Investment Company Act of 1940, referred to in subsec. (b), is title I of act Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, 54 Stat. 789, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§80a–1 et seq.) of chapter 2D of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 80a–51 of Title 15 and Tables.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.947 Building product standards and certification program for polystyrene foam insulation board. ( a ) *Applicable standards.* ( 1 ) All polystyrene foam insulation board shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard C-578-92, Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation.
( 2 ) This standard has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference. The standard is available from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. This standard is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) *Labeling.* Under the procedures set forth in § 200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's certification of compliance with the applicable standards and the type of board are required to be on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality assurance inspection.* Under the procedure set forth in § 200.935(d)(8), testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) At least every six months, the administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified polystyrene foam insulation board for testing by a laboratory approved by the administrator.
( 2 ) The administrator also shall review the quality assurance procedures every six months to assure that they are being followed by the manufacturer.
[58 FR 67675, Dec. 22, 1993]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco. CA94105·3901 June 21, 2012 Mr. Eric Massey, Division Director Air Quality Division Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality 1110 WestWashington Street Phoenix,Arizona 85007 Re: EPA comments on the Proposed State Implementation Plan (SIP) for theNogales PM10 Nonattainment Area DearMr. Massey: OnJune 20, 2012, Regional Administrator Blumenfeld signed aFederal RegisterNoticeproposing approval ofArizona's "Proposed State Implementation Plan for the Nogales PM10Nonattainment Area." As described in this notice, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's)proposed approval ofthe plan'smotor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB) is contingent on the submittal ofa revised MVEB that includes road construction dust (see generally, 40 CFR 93.122(e)). We, therefore, request that the Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ADEQ) submit a revised MVEB for the Nogales PMI0 SIP that includes road construction dust, following the State'sprocedures for submitting a SIP revision to EPA. We request that the revised MVEB be submitted to EPA expeditiously, so we can resolve this issue in our final action which we expect to take in late July. We regret our contribution to the omission ofroad constructi<m dust from the MVEB and appreciate the extra time and effort it will take from your staffto make this correction. We look forward to continued collaboration with ADEQ. Ifyou have any questions or concerns, please contact me at (415) 972-3854, orJerryWamsley at (415) 947-4111.

Lisa Hanf, Manager Planning Office, Air Division

Printed (HI Recvcled Paper
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                     $12,712,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,951,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,298,510
<PP&E>                                      32,670,220
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,780,318)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,833,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,826,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,012
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,901,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,833,908
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,657,854
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,189,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,052,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,052,498
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,052,498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>
### §9805. Statement of purpose

The purpose of this part is to establish special programs of assistance to nonprofit private locally initiated community development corporations which (1) are directed to the solution of the critical problems existing in particular communities or neighborhoods (defined without regard to political or other subdivisions or boundaries) within those urban and rural areas having concentrations or substantial numbers of low-income persons; (2) are of sufficient size, scope, and duration to have an appreciable impact in such communities, neighborhoods, and rural areas in arresting tendencies toward dependency, chronic unemployment, and community deterioration; (3) hold forth the prospect of continuing to have such impact after the termination of financial assistance under this part; and (4) provide financial and other assistance to start, expand, or locate enterprises in or near the area to be served so as to provide employment and ownership opportunities for residents of such areas, including those who are disadvantaged in the labor market because of their limited speaking, reading, and writing abilities in the English language.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §616, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 490.)
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FOAD ALOWDI,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ABLE BUILDING SERVICES d/b/a ABM,

MANILO GARCIA, and ROBERT

ESQUADA,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01258 WHA

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

TO SHORTEN TIME FOR

HEARING OF PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

AND CASE SCHEDULE

Pursuant to the case management order entered in this matter, the deadline to amend the

pleadings was September 30, 2009. That deadline is now long since passed and trial is

scheduled to begin on July 12, 2010. On February 9, 2010, the parties stipulated to seek leave

to amend the case management order to permit plaintiff to file a fourth amended complaint. 

They also sought to adjust the trial date and other pretrial deadlines. Because the parties’

stipulation did not provide a reason that the amendment should be allowed except for the

agreement of the parties, the request to amend was denied without prejudice to trying again.

Now plaintiff has filed a renewed motion to amend his complaint and the case

management order. He seeks to extend the fact discovery cut-off in this action from February

25, 2010, until his motion to amend his complaint and the case management order can be

heard, and seeks to shorten time for hearing the motion to March 11, 2010. He has submitted a

sworn declaration stating that defendants have informed plaintiff’s counsel that they do not

oppose the motion to shorten time or the motion to amend the complaint and the case

management order.

Case 3:09-cv-01258-WHA Document 33 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

For good cause shown, plaintiff’s motion to shorten time is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s

motion to amend the complaint and scheduling order shall be heard on MARCH 11, 2010, AT

8:00 A.M. However, the fact discovery cut-off of February 25, 2010, as set in the case

management order, shall not be extended at this time. Plaintiff states that the discovery cut-off

should be extended because defendants “have still not provided sufficient information and

documentation in response to discovery propounded on September 3, 2010, regarding the

original issues in the case” (Br. at 2). Plaintiff should have been more diligent in moving to

compel responses to his discovery requests propounded almost six months ago.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01258-WHA Document 33 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 17.61 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *In general.* HUD will undertake debt collection pursuant to this subpart in accordance with the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, codified in scattered sections of 31 U.S.C. chapter 37; the revised Federal Claims Collection Standards, codified at 31 CFR parts 900 through 904; the Treasury debt collection regulations set forth in 31 CFR part 285; and such additional provisions as provided in this subpart.
( b ) *Applicability of other statutes and regulations.* ( 1 ) Nothing in this subpart precludes the authority under statutes and regulations other than those described in this subpart to collect, settle, compromise, or close claims, including, but not limited to: ( i ) Debts incurred by contractors under contracts for supplies and services awarded by HUD under the authority of subpart 32.6 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR);
( ii ) Debts arising out of the business operations of the Government National Mortgage Association; and
( iii ) Debts arising under Title I or section 204(g) of Title II of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*).
( 2 ) This subpart is not applicable to tax debts or to any debt for which there is an indication of fraud or misrepresentation, unless the debt is returned by the Department of Justice to HUD for handling.
( c ) *Scope.* Sections 17.65 through 17.79, under the heading Administrative Offset and Other Actions, includes the procedures that apply when HUD seeks satisfaction of debts owed to HUD by administrative offset of payments by the Federal Government other than Federal salary payments, and when HUD takes other administrative actions for nonpayment of debt. Section 17.81, under the heading Administrative Wage Garnishment, includes the procedures that apply when HUD seeks to satisfy a debt owed to HUD out of the debtor's compensation from an employer other than the Federal Government. Sections 17.83 through 17.113, under the heading Salary Offset, include procedures that apply when HUD or another Federal agency seeks to satisfy a debt owed to it through offset of the salary of a current Federal employee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

RONALD C. TYLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

450 Golden Gate Avenue

19th Floor, Box 36106

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant Juan Luis Cavinal

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUAN LUIS CAVINAL,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-09-0520 JCS

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

HEARING

Defendant and the government, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that,

subject to the court’s approval, the status hearing in the above-captioned matter, presently set for

Friday, March 19, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. be continued until April 2, 2010. The reason for the

continuance is that defense counsel will be out of the district teaching on the presently set date. 

The government has no objection to this request.

/ /

/ /

/ /

/ /

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER;

No. CR-09-0520 JCS 1

Case 3:09-cr-00520-JCS Document 16 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cr-00520-JCS Document15 Filed03/12/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: March 12, 2010 ____/s/________________________

RONALD C. TYLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Dated: March 12, 2010 ____/s/________________________

ACADIA SENESE

Special Assistant United States Attorney

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED that the status hearing in the

aforementioned matter currently set for Friday, March 12, 2010 be continued until April 2, 2010

at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________________ _______________________________________

HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER;

No. CR-09-0520 JCS 2

Case3:09-cr-00520-JCS Document15 Filed03/12/10 Page2 of 2

March 15, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:09-cr-00520-JCS Document 16 Filed 03/15/10 Page 2 of 2
G. Singh ± Request for Dismissal 

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DENISE EATON MAY (SBN 116780) 

Attorney at Law 

14895 E.14th Street, Suite 130 

San Leandro, CA 94578 

Tel.: 510.888.1345 

Fax: 510.888.1655 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

GURMINDER SINGH 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

GURMINDER SINGH 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER 

GENERAL, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, 

 Defendant. 

Case No.: C 08-4337 EDL 

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 

Filed: 

Trial: 

 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: that Plaintiff, Gurminder 

Singh, requests a dismissal of all actions with prejudice from the above-entitled action. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

DATED: April 16, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 /s/ Denise Eaton May 

Denise Eaton May, Attorney for Plaintiff 

AMBER ANGELINE 

// 

Case3:08-cv-04337-EDL Document48 Filed04/20/10 Page1 of 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2010 ___________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04337-EDL Document 50 Filed 04/22/10 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH MCINERNEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et

al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C 09-00430 JSW

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING

HEARING DATE ON MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS AND SETTING

HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON MOTION TO

ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

On August 3, 2010, Plaintiff Joseph McInerney filed a Motion for Sanctions, which is

noticed for hearing on September 24, 2010. On August 17, 2010, McInerney filed a Motion to

Alter or Amend Judgment, and did not notice that motion for a specific hearing date. 

It is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ opposition briefs to these motions shall be

filed by no later than September 10, 2010. Plaintiffs’ reply briefs shall be filed by no later than

September 24, 2010. The hearing on the motion for sanctions is CONTINUED from

September 24, 2010 to October 8, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., and the hearing on the motion to alter or

amend judgment shall be heard on that date as well. If either party wishes to modify this

schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration an administrative motion or a

stipulation and proposed order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2010 

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00430-JSW Document 50 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH MCINERNEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

SF CITY & COUNTY et al,

Defendant.

 /

Case Number: CV09-00430 JSW 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on August 23, 2010, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter

listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an

inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Joseph McInerney

60 North Third Street #301

San Jose, CA 95112

Dated: August 23, 2010

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Case 3:09-cv-00430-JSW Document 50 Filed 08/23/10 Page 2 of 2