alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      ( print page 77756)    
Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-76, dated October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as amended most recently at 69 FR 63154-63156, dated October 29, 2004, is amended to reflect the Order of Succession for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Section C-C, Order of Succession:

Delete in its entirety Section C-C, Order of Succession, and insert the following:

During the absence or disability of the Director, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), or in the event of a vacancy in that office, the first official listed below who is available shall act as Director, except that during a planned period of absence, the Director may specify a different order of succession:

1. Chief Operating Officer, CDC.

2. Chief of Science, CDC.

3. Chief of Public Health Improvement.

                    4. Director, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases.*

* official organizational structure pending approval.

Dated: December 13, 2004.

William H. Gimson, 

Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

[FR Doc. 04-28377  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
July 1, 2015

Mr. Corey Ingalls

T echnical Specialist

NMotion UAS, LLC

216 North Mosley Street, #210

Wichita, KS 67202

Dear Mr. Ingalls:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§ § 45.23(b), 61. 113 (a) and (b), 91.7 (a), 91.9 (b)(2), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121,

91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405 (a), 91.407 (a)(1), 91.409 (a)(2)

, 91.409 (a)(2)

, 91.417

(a) and (b), and Subpart H of part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 17, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of NMotion UAS, LLC into the

public docket (No. FAA− 20 15

− 1239 ), but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consid er the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William M. Pastore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/WILLIAM M. PASTORE                                         
| |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     | William M. Pastore
      President and Chief Executive Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc.
and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment to the Employment Agreement dated as of November 13, 2008 (the “Agreement”)
by and between Rockwood Specialties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”)
and Thomas J. Riordan (the “Executive” ) is hereby executed as of October 28,
2010.


 


1.               Section 4
of the Agreement is amended, effective as of calendar year 2010, by
substituting “110%” for “100%” in the first sentence thereof.


 


2.               Section 6.3
of the Agreement is amended, effective January 1, 2010, to read as
follows:


 


“6.3         Company Car.  During the employment term, the Executive
will be provided with use of a Company automobile or an automobile allowance
equivalent to the lease payment of an automobile commensurate with the
Executive’s position, including reimbursement on a monthly basis for expenses
associated with operating the automobile including gas, insurance and
maintenance.  The reimbursements called
for by this Section 6.3 (as well as by Sections 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6) shall be
paid in accordance with the Company’s reimbursement policy for senior
executives (but in no event later than the last day of the calendar year next
following the calendar year in which the Executive pays the respective
expenses).  Payment or reimbursement of
such amounts with respect to any calendar year shall not affect the amount
eligible for payment or reimbursement in any other calendar year, and such
payments and reimbursements may not be exchanged for cash or another benefit.”


 


3.               Clause (iv) of
each of Sections 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6 is amended to read as follows:


 


“(iv) provide continued use of Executive’s
Company automobile or a continued automobile allowance for a period of twelve
(12) months (as provided in Section 6.3); and”


 


4.               Except as set
forth above, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
and delivered as of the day and year first above set forth.


 


 


	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Sheldon R. Erikson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Sheldon R. Erikson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
    Chairman, Compensation Committee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/
  Thomas J. Riordan

  
	
   

  	
  Thomas
  J. Riordan
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2024-07-02T17:20:18-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mayers v. Taylor, et al., Case No. CV 09-0790 EDL (EMC) 

[Proposed] Order Dismissing with Prejudice Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendants Steven James Verret and 

Improv TVS, Inc. dba The Improv Traffic School 

DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 

2001 CENTER STREET, FOURTH FLOOR

BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204

(510) 665-8644

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEVEN MAYERS,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

LOREE DIANE TAYLOR, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: CV 09 0790 EDL (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 

WITH PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S 

CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS 

STEVEN JAMES VERRET AND IMPROV 

TVS, INC. dba THE IMPROV TRAFFIC 

SCHOOL

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Action Filed: February 23, 2009 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and upon the request of Plaintiff 

Steven Mayers, the Court hereby orders all claims in the First Amended Complaint against 

Defendants Steven James Verret and Improv TVS, Inc. dba The Improv Traffic School 

dismissed with prejudice. 

DATED: _______________________ 

 ___________________________________ 

 Hon. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case3:09-cv-00790-EDL Document104 Filed02/19/10 Page3 of 3

February 19, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00790-EDL Document 105 Filed 02/19/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Consultant Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), each of the undersigned, Richard D. Helppie, Jr., Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard R. Sorensen, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge and belief, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      Date: November 15, 2004                     /s/ Richard D. Helppie, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Richard D. Helppie, Jr.
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

      Date: November 15, 2004                     /s/ Richard R. Sorensen
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Richard R. Sorensen
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
      other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
      signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
      written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Superior
      Consultant Holdings Corporation and will be retained by Superior
      Consultant Holdings Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-60046

Summary Calendar

THOMAS E. GRAY, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:17-CV-34

Before REAVLEY, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by 

that court. Appellant insists that the Mississippi Supreme Court opinion in 

Allen v. Banks, 384 So. 2d 63 (1980) supports intoxication as the negligence of 

liability, but that opinion makes it clear that causation is a different matter. 

The gap in the appellant’s case here is that no evidence would support a 

proximate cause of causation for this case’s path.

AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-60046 Document: 00514564135 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/20/2018
2009 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-22-2009

Polymer Dynamics Inc v. Bayer Corp

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-3730

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Polymer Dynamics Inc v. Bayer Corp" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 975.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/975
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

Nos. 07-3730, 07-3731, 

and 07-4645

_____________

POLYMER DYNAMICS, INC.,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

BAYER CORPORATION,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant

_______________

On Appeal From the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Civil No. 99-cv-04040)

District Judge: Honorable Petrese B. Tucker

__________________

ORDER AMENDING

__________________

It appearing that the opinion and judgment filed in this matter listed only docket

number 07-3730 when in fact the opinion and judgment addressed action numbers 07-

3730, 07-3731, and 07-4645, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the Clerk shall file an

amended opinion and judgment listing all three actions in the caption.

For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Dated: July 22, 2009

trj/cc: Jeffrey A. Lamken, Esq.

Michael M. Mustkoff, Esq.

Virginia A. Seitz, Esq.
### §8236a. Technical assistance

Not later than 2 years after October 24, 1992, the Secretary shall establish a program to provide technical assistance to State and local organizations to encourage the adoption of and use of residential energy efficiency rating systems consistent with the voluntary guidelines issued under section 8236 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title II, §272, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §102(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2788.)
§ 107.45 Resolution of matters. ( a ) Attempts to resolve and remedy matters found in a complaint investigation or a compliance review shall be made through the methods of conference, conciliation, and persuasion.
( b ) Resolution of matters pursuant to this section and § 107.40 need not be attempted where similar efforts by another Federal agency have been unsuccessful in ending and remedying the violation found with respect to the same respondent.
( c ) Efforts to remedy matters shall be directed toward achieving a just resolution of the probable violation and obtaining assurance(s) that the respondent will satisfactorily remedy any violation of E.O. 11063 and will take actions to eliminate the discriminatory practices and prevent reoccurrences. Compensation to individuals from the respondent may also be considered.
( d ) The terms of settlements shall be reduced to a written agreement, signed by the respondent and the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO or a designee. Such settlements shall seek to protect the interests of the complainant, if any, other persons similarly affected, and the public interest. A written notice of the disposition of matters pursuant to this section and of the terms of settlements shall be given to the Area Manager by the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO or a designee and to the complainant, if any. When the Assistant Secretary or a designee determines that there has been a violation of a settlement agreement, the Assistant Secretary immediately may take action to impose sanctions provided under this part, including the referral of the matter to the Attorney General for appropriate action.
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 124 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 2
Dated: June 21, 2010 WILLIAM ALSUP

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 124 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register: October 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 208)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66377]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28oc10-38]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0048]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit 
Insurance Policy.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit Insurance 
Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of the applicant and 
the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance under its insurance 
program. Export-Import Bank customers will be able to submit this form 
on paper or electronically.
    The Export-Import Bank has made changes to incorporate new 
information in the Certification and Notice sections of this form to 
clarify and expand to encompass broader anti-corruption certifications. 
In the Certification and Notice sections we rewrote some of the 
language for clarification, we corrected references to the debarment 
list, and we added references to the OFAC and the EPLS system. In 
addition, we clarified two questions about the amount of U.S. 
employment to be supported by this transaction and added a question to 
implement greater flexibility in our U.S. content requirements.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before November 29, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 3048-
0023.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 92-50 Application for Short-Term Multi-
Buyer Export Credit Insurance Policy.
    OMB Number: 3048-0023.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: The Application for Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export 
Credit Insurance Policy will be used to determine the eligibility of 
the applicant and the transaction for Export-Import Bank assistance 
under its insurance program.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-27252 Filed 10-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### § 203.288 Discontinuance of adjusted premium charge.

Notwithstanding any provision in the mortgage instrument, there shall be no adjusted mortgage insurance premium due the Commissioner on account of the prepayment of any mortgage on or after May 1, 1972.

[37 FR 8662, Apr. 29, 1972]
## LAW OFFICE OFJOHN MIETUS,LLC 6701 DEMOCRACY BOULEVARD, SUITE 300 BETHESDA, MD 20817-7500

September 24, 2013 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Ms. Esta Rosenberg Mr. Robert Finamore Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington DC 20590 jOHN R.. M!EIUS,JR. (202) 747-5212 (240) 396-5362 fax john@mietuslaw.com

Re: Docket OST-2013-0179, Joint Application ofAeromexico and Delta (Cancun-Chicago) Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Finamore: The JointApplicants have completed their poll ofthe U.S. carriers served on September 20, 2013 with the above-captioned application. There were no objections. The JointApplicants would appreciate expedited Department action on their application. Respectfully submitted,



### John R. Mietf Counsel for Aeromexico
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable David L. Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska. ___________ No. 95-1572

___________ Enebiene P. Ijoma, * * Appellant, * * Petition for Review of v. * and Order of the Immigration * and Naturalization Service. Immigration and Naturalization * Service, (Omaha District) * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 31, 1996 Filed: February 6, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Enebiene P. Ijoma, a citizen of Nigeria, appeals the District Court's 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the judgment of the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.