alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0172.08.005.603 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2009 CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 02/24/11 Time: 10:24 am

pm

Company Name: Seapac of Idaho, Inc. ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Landick

Contact Name: Tom VanTassel Contact Phone Number: (208) 837-6541

General Subject: 2009 DMR Copper Discharges

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On February 24, 2011 at 10:24am I called the Water Quality Division of the Idaho Department of 

Environmental Quality (208-373-0120). I was told to call the Twin Falls Regional Office of the DEQ (208-736-

2190). I called this office and spoke with Pat Hayes. She told me that I need to submit a Public Records Request 

and include the details of the facilities and a timeframe of request. To submit a Public Records Request go to 

www.deq.idaho.gov, click on Find it Fast, Public Records Request, Online Request. The online request did not 

work for me so I was told to fax over a request to 208-373-0417. 

On March 1, 2011 at 4:14pm I called the facility directly using the PCS contact from OTIS (Tom VanTassel 

208-837-6541) and left a message. At 5:08pm Mr. VanTassel returned my call and left a message. 

On March 2, 2011 at 9:29am I called Mr. VanTassel back. He told me that they have seven outfalls and they 

compile all the samples into one composite sample to send to the lab. It’s also a two-tiered hatchery. They have 

ten different raise ways and they apply copper to each at 20 minute intervals. He confirmed the values below:

Copper Concentrations: 20090331 18.3 UGL

20090630 32.6 UGL

Flow: 20090331 92.22 CFS (measure on a weekly basis)

We had MGL for concentration values. Recommend changing milligrams per liter to micrograms per liter for 

all 2009 copper concentrations.
### §8236. Voluntary rating guidelines

#### (a) In general

Not later than 18 months after October 24, 1992, the Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, representatives of existing home energy rating programs, and other appropriate persons, shall, by rule, issue voluntary guidelines that may be used by State and local governments, utilities, builders, real estate agents, lenders, agencies in mortgage markets, and others, to enable and encourage the assignment of energy efficiency ratings to residential buildings.

#### (b) Contents of guidelines

The voluntary guidelines issued under subsection (a) shall—

(1) encourage uniformity with regard to systems for rating the annual energy efficiency of residential buildings;

(2) establish protocols and procedures for—

(A) certification of the technical accuracy of building energy analysis tools used to determine energy efficiency ratings;

(B) training of personnel conducting energy efficiency ratings;

(C) data collection and reporting;

(D) quality control; and

(E) monitoring and evaluation;

(3) encourage consistency with, and support for, the uniform plan for Federal energy efficient mortgages, including that developed under section 946 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12712 note) and pursuant to sections 105 and 106 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992;

(4) provide that rating systems take into account local climate conditions and construction practices, solar energy collected on-site, and the benefits of peak load shifting construction practices, and not discriminate among fuel types; and

(5) establish procedures to ensure that residential buildings can receive an energy efficiency rating at the time of sale and that such rating is communicated to potential buyers.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title II, §271, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §102(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2787.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 946 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), is section 946 of Pub. L. 101–625, which is set out as a note under section 12712 of this title.

Sections 105 and 106 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), are sections 105 and 106 of Pub. L. 102–486. Section 105 amended section 12704 of this title and provisions set out as a note under section 12712 of this title. Section 106 is classified to section 1701z–16 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
### SUBCHAPTER XVI—REFUNDS TO WAR VETERANS
### §6233. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(6), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2030

Section, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §153, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 882; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288, related to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Office.
§ 71.12 Dietary supplements. ( a ) *Eligibility criteria.* A prisoner is considered eligible for the dietary supplement program under the following general criteria: ( 1 ) An evaluation by a priviate physician, prison doctor, or other host country medical authority reveals that the prison diet does not meet the minimum requriements to sustain adequate health; or
( 2 ) If the evaluation in paragraph (a)(1) of this section is not available, an evaluation by either a regional medical officer or Departmental medical officer reveals that the prison diet does not provide the minimum requirements to sustain adequate health.
( b ) *Consular responsibility.* ( 1 ) When the consular officer is aware that the U.S. prisoner's diet does not provide the minimum requirements to sustain adequate health, the consular officer shall obtain the necessary dietary supplements and distribute them to the prisoner on a regular basis.
( 2 ) As soon as the consular officer believes that dietary supplements are being misused, the consular officer shall suspend provision of the dietary supplements and report the incident in full to the Department.
### §1741. Annual reports

#### (a) Purpose; time for submission

For the purpose of providing information that will aid Congress in carrying out its oversight responsibilities for public lands programs and for other purposes, the Secretary shall prepare a report in accordance with subsections (b) and (c) and submit it to the Congress no later than one hundred and twenty days after the end of each fiscal year beginning with the report for fiscal year 1979.

#### (b) Format

A list of programs and specific information to be included in the report as well as the format of the report shall be developed by the Secretary after consulting with the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate and shall be provided to the committees prior to the end of the second quarter of each fiscal year.

#### (c) Contents

The report shall include, but not be limited to, program identification information, program evaluation information, and program budgetary information for the preceding current and succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title III, §311, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2768; Pub. L. 103–437, §16(d)(3), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4595.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate" for "Committees on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House and Senate".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions of law requiring submittal to Congress of any annual, semiannual, or other regular periodic report listed in House Document No. 103–7 (in which the 9th item on page 112 identifies a reporting provision which, as subsequently amended, is contained in this section), see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Frank L. Rush, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Time to perfect appeal extended 90 days. Motion in all other respects denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350

          In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission of Emergent Group Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned,
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that (i) in our capacities as officers of the Company, (ii) to
each of our own respective actual knowledge, and (iii) solely for the purpose of
compliance with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

(1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

          The above certification is given as of the date of the Report and is
limited to the periods covered by the Report. The above certification is made
severally and not jointly.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on
August 11, 2004.


                                   By: /s/ William M. McKay
                                       --------------------
                                       William M. McKay
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S JULY 31, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                         3136000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1117000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     57000
<INVENTORY>                                    3448000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8778000
<PP&E>                                        46417000
<DEPRECIATION>                                16128000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                41360000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4713000
<BONDS>                                       20074000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4000
<OTHER-SE>                                    15597000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  41360000
<SALES>                                       18813000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19014000
<CGS>                                         12138000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 12138000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5158000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 57000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1076000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 572000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    226000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             346000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    346000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification Pursuant To  Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I,
Michael J. Grebe, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Interline Brands, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: February 23, 2010

By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. GREBEName:

Michael J. GrebeTitle:

Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President


---



QuickLinks
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ONE TRUE VINE LLC,

Plaintiff(s),

    v.

THE WINE GROUP LLC,

Defendant(s).                                                                      /

No. C 09-1328 MHP

ORDER(Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

settlement of this action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on

opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the

settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be

restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: 2/19/2010MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01328-MHP   Document 69   Filed 02/22/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T11:58:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–498 

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO 

THE HOUSE AMENDMENT TO THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE BILL 

(H.R. 2764) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 

FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND RELATED PROGRAMS FOR THE FISCAL 

YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE 

JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 72) MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 893] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 893, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The rule provides for the consideration of two measures. The first 

measure is a motion by the chairman of the Committee on Appropriations to concur in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment to H.R. 2764, the Department of 

State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations 

Act, 2008. The rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion except for clause 10 of rule XXI; provides that the 

Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read; and 

provides one hour of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The second measure is H.J. Res. 72, providing further continuing 

appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008. The closed rule waives all 

points of order against the joint resolution and against its consideration except for clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI; provides that the 

joint resolution shall be considered as read; provides one hour of 

general debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and allows for one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with HEARING
The rule also provides that the Chair may postpone further consideration of either measure to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Finally, the rule tables House Resolution 849. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the motion (except for clause 10 of rule XXI), all points of order 

against consideration of the joint resolution (except clauses 9 and 

10 of rule XXI), and all points of order against provisions of the 

joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any points of order 

against either measure. The waivers are prophylactic. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with HEARING
# PORTOFOAKLAND

December 20,2013

Mr.Paul Gretch, Director Mr.Robert Finamore, Chief Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC20590 Docket: DOT-OST-2013-0204 J.Christopher Lytle Executive Director

ANSWER OF THE PORT OF OAKLAND IN SUPPORT OF NORWEGIAN AIR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED FOR EXEMPTION AUTHORITY AND A FOREIGN AIR CARRIER PERMIT The Port of Oakland, which owns and operates the Oakland International Airport ("OAK"), respectfully submits this Answer in strong support of the application of Norwegian Air International Limited ("Norwegian") for a foreign air carrier permit to enable it to operate scheduled service between OAK and both Norway and Sweden. The operations proposed by Norwegian atOAK will bring substantial economic benefit andjob creation to the airport area economic development zone and to the greater San Francisco Bay Area. The services that Norwegian proposes are in line with President's January 2012 Executive Order on Travel and Tourism and are aligned with theNational Travel and Tourism Strategy. OAK therefore urges thattheapplication ofNorwegian bepromptly granted bytheDepartment. The San Francisco Bay Area is the 3rd largest U.S. origin and destination market. OAK is the most centrally located airport inthe region, being the closest airport to 47.5% ofthe Bay Area population according to the 2010 US Census. Additionally, Airport staff research indicates the largest grouping oforiginating European departing passengers from the SanFrancisco Bay Area (36.3%) come from OAK's immediate catchment area in Alameda, Contra Costa and other nearby counties in the East and North Bay Area. OAK currently has no scheduled year round nonstop service to Europe. The operations proposed by Norwegian at OAK will provide this much needed service and the resultant economic benefit andjob creation in the surrounding regIOn. International visitors spend $20.1 billion annually inCalifornia andrepresent the State's largest export. Norwegian's initial service atOAK isestimated to bring 72,000 international visitors to 530Water Street - JackLondon Square - P.O.Box2064 - Oakland, California 94604-2064 Telephone: (510) 627-1100 - Facsimile: (510) 627-1826 - Web Page: www.portofoakland.comthe Bay Area in the first year of operation. According to California Travel and Tourism

Commission statistics, these international visitors will contribute an estimated $127 million to the California economy. The total economic impact ofNorwegian's new Bay Area service is estimated atover $152million. On behalf of the Port of Oakland, we urge the Department to promptly grant Norwegian's application for authority to operate as proposed so that Norwegian can commence flights between Oakland International Airport andbothNorway and Sweden assoon aspossible. Respectfully submitted,

ytle Executive Director
5

UNITED STATES

D

I

STRICT COURT

NORTHERN

DIST

RI

CT

OF CALIFORNIA

IT

IS

SO

ORDERED

Judge

Marilyn

H. Patel
(May 8, 1962)

#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Loewengart & Company, Respondent, and M. Beckerman & Sons, Inc., Appellant.

Order entered on April 4,1961, so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent. No opinion. Appeal from order entered on April 10, 1961 unanimously dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
### §1475. Bureau of Reclamation acceptance of services of volunteers

The Bureau of Reclamation may on and after September 29, 1989, accept the services of volunteers and, from any funds available to it, provide for their incidental expenses to carry out any activity of the Bureau of Reclamation except policymaking or law or regulatory enforcement. Such volunteers shall not be deemed employees of the United States Government, except for the purposes of chapter 81 of title 5 relating to compensation for work injuries, and shall not be deemed employees of the Bureau of Reclamation except for the purposes of tort claims to the same extent as a regular employee of the Bureau of Reclamation would be under identical circumstances.

(Pub. L. 101–101, title II, Sept. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 656.)