alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9912. Office of Community Services

#### (a) Office

The Secretary shall carry out the functions of this chapter through an Office of Community Services, which shall be established in the Department of Health and Human Services. The Office shall be headed by a Director.

#### (b) Grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements

The Secretary shall carry out functions of this chapter through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §678, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, §201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2742.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9912, Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §684, formerly §683, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519; Pub. L. 98–288, §31(b), May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 198; renumbered §684, Pub. L. 103–252, title II, §205(1), May 18, 1994, 108 Stat. 655, contained provisions repealing certain other statutory provisions, reauthorizing appropriations, and conforming references, prior to general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.

A prior section 678 of Pub. L. 97–35 was classified to section 9907 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.
#### § 203.616 Mortgage modification.

The mortgagee may modify a mortgage for the purpose of changing the amortization provisions by recasting the total unpaid amount due for a term not exceeding 480 months. The mortgagee must notify HUD of such modification in a format prescribed by HUD within 30 days of the execution of the modification agreement.

[62 FR 60130, Nov. 6, 1997, as amended at 88 FR 14259, Mar. 8, 2023]
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                      |                                                              |                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Dated                this 13 th                day                of November, 2006. | By:                                                     | /s/                Liang Zhang |
|                                                                                      | Liang                Zhang Chief                Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit
32.1





TOT
Energy, Inc.


12100 NE
16 Ave; Suite 210


North
Miami, FL 33161





July 13,
2010





Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F
Street, NE


Washington,
DC 20549





Re:
Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350





Dear
Ladies and Gentlemen:





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of TOT Energy, Inc.,
for the year ended March 31, 2010, each of the undersigned hereby certify
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), to the
undersigned’s knowledge that:




1.
            such Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of TOT Energy, Inc., for the year ended March 31, 2010, fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and


2.
            the information contained in such
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of TOT Energy, Inc., for the year ended March
      31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of TOT Energy,
    Inc.




BY:
      /S/ Mike ZoiMike
      ZoiChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)BY:
      /S/ Jonathan NewJonathan
      NewChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to TOT Energy, Inc. and will be
retained by TOT Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





In
accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K, this certification is
being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to TOT Energy, Inc.’s annual report and
shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
#### Pinkston *v.*Carter & Patterson.

April 13, 1912.

Claim. Before Judge Littlejohn. Stewart superior court. July 24, 1911.

*Hatcher & Hatcher,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. T. Hickey*and *Tomlinson Fort,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

There being no contention that any error of law was com* mitted upon the trial, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the judge did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### SUBCHAPTER XI–A—RECLAMATION SAFETY OF DAMS
#### SCHMID, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 23, 1903.)

Action by Gottfried Schmid against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. B. H. Ames, for appellant. J. R. Cady, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

 

E.L.A., JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3562 

)

M.F.M., )

)

Appellee. )

) 

Opinion filed May 30, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Carl C. Hinson, 

Judge.

E.L.A., pro se. 

Lawrence J. Hodz of Cortes Hodz Family 

Law & Mediation, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., and GENTILE, GEOFFREY H., ASSOCIATE JUDGE, 

Concur.
§ 1003.305 Program amendments. ( a ) Grantees shall request prior HUD approval for program amendments which will significantly change the scope, location, objective, or class of beneficiaries of the approved activities, as originally described in the application.
( b ) Amendment requests of $100,000 or more shall include all application components required by the NOFA published for the last application cycle; those requests of less than $100,000 do not have to include the components which address the selection criteria.
( c ) Approval of an amendment request is subject to the following: ( 1 ) A rating equal to or greater than the lowest rating received by a funded project during the most recent funding competition must be attained by the amended project if the request is for $100,000 or more;
( 2 ) Demonstration by the grantee of the capacity to promptly complete the modified or new activities;
( 3 ) Demonstration by the grantee of compliance with the requirements of § 1003.604 for citizen participation; and
( 4 ) The preparation of an amended or new environmental review in accordance with part 58 of this title, if there is a significant change in the scope or location of approved activities.
( d ) Amendments which address imminent threats to health and safety shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with the requirements of subpart E of this part.
( e ) If a program amendment fails to be approved and the original project is no longer feasible, the grant funds proposed for amendment shall be recaptured by HUD.
§ 115.202 Request for interim certification. ( a ) A request for interim certification under this subpart shall be filed with the Assistant Secretary by the state or local official having principal responsibility for the administration of the state or local fair housing law. The request shall be supported by the text of the jurisdiction's fair housing law, the law creating and empowering the agency, all laws referenced in the jurisdiction's fair housing law, any regulations and directives issued under the law, and any formal opinions of the State Attorney General or the chief legal officer of the jurisdiction that pertain to the jurisdiction's fair housing law. A request shall also include organizational information of the agency responsible for administering and enforcing the law.
( b ) The request and supporting materials shall be filed with the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410-2000. The Assistant Secretary shall forward a copy of the request and supporting materials to the appropriate FHEO regional director. A copy of the request and supporting materials will be kept available for public examination and copying at: ( 1 ) The office of the Assistant Secretary; and
( 2 ) The office of the state or local agency charged with administration and enforcement of the state or local fair housing law.
( c ) Upon receipt of a request, HUD will analyze the agency's fair housing law to determine whether it meets the criteria identified in § 115.204.
( d ) HUD shall review a request for interim certification from a local agency located in a state with an interim certified or certified substantially equivalent state agency. However, in the request for interim certification, the local agency must certify that the substantially equivalent state law does not prohibit the local agency from administering and enforcing its own fair housing law within the locality.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.63 Required deposits and letters of credit. ( a ) *Deposits.* Where the Commissioner requires the mortgagor to make a deposit of cash or securities, such deposit shall be with the mortgagee or a depository acceptable to the mortgagee. The deposit shall be held by the mortgagee in a special account or by the depository under an appropriate agreement approved by the Commissioner.
( b ) *Letter of credit.* Where the use of a letter of credit is acceptable to the Commissioner in lieu of a deposit of cash or securities, the letter of credit shall be issued to the mortgagee by a banking institution and shall be unconditional and irrevocable: ( 1 ) The mortgagee of record may not be the issuer of any letter of credit without the prior written consent of the Commissioner.
( 2 ) The mortgagee shall be responsible to the Commissioner for collection under the letter of credit. In the event a demand for payment thereunder is not immediately met, the mortgagee shall immediately provide a cash deposit equivalent to the undrawn balance of the letter of credit.
§ 221.751 Cross-reference. ( a ) All of the provisions of subpart B, part 207 of this chapter, covering mortgages insured under section 207 of the National Housing Act, apply with full force and effect to multifamily project mortgages insured under section 221 of the National Housing Act, except the following provisions: Sec. 207.252 First, second, and third premium. 207.252a Premiums—operating loss loans. 207.259 Insurance benefits.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, all references in part 207 of this chapter to section 207 of the act shall be construed to refer to section 221 of the Act, and all references to part 207 shall be construed to refer to this subpart.
[36 FR 24587, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 37 FR 8663, Apr. 29, 1972; 42 FR 59675, Nov. 18, 1977]
### §9924. References

Any reference in any provision of law to the poverty line set forth in section 624 or 625 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 shall be construed to be a reference to the poverty line defined in section 9902 of this title. Except as otherwise provided, any reference in any provision of law to any community action agency designated under title II of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 shall be construed to be a reference to an entity eligible to receive funds under the community services block grant program.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683, as added Pub. L. 105–285, title II, §201, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2755.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 88–452, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 508. Title II of the Act was classified generally to subchapter II (§2781 et seq.) of chapter 34 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519. Section 625 of the Act, which was subsequently renumbered section 624 of the Act and related to the poverty line, was classified to section 2971d of this title, prior to repeal by section 683(a) of Pub. L. 97–35. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 683 of Pub. L. 97–35 was classified to section 9911 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.

Another prior section 683 of Pub. L. 97–35 was renumbered section 684, and was classified to section 9912 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 105–285.
Exhibit 32.1

GMH COMMUNITIES TRUST    CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY  RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I,
Gary M. Holloway, Sr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of GMH Communities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:



*
* *

|/s/GARY M. HOLLOWAY, SR.Gary M. Holloway, Sr.
Chairman, President and Chief
    Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

Date:
March 28, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Severance Program



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE 
 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 
 OF STRATEGIC
HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. 
 September 15, 2010 

The following resolution of the Board of Directors constitutes the amendment and restatement of the Strategic Hotel Capital, Inc.
Severance Program as the Strategic Hotels & Resorts Severance Program: 
 RESOLVED, that the
Board hereby approves the severance program (the “Severance Program”) for the Corporation as follows: In the event of involuntary termination or severance of a full-time employee with the Corporation and its affiliates for any reason by
the Corporation, other than good cause based on such employee’s performance, the Corporation shall use the following severance schedule as a guideline, subject to decrease (including to zero) and payment schedule as determined appropriate by
the Corporation in its sole discretion: 
  

	 	•	 	 Band 1 and Band 2 (Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Vice President) – 12-months Pay (“Pay” shall mean base salary,
target bonus plus payment in lieu of medical insurance for the period of severance) 


  

	 	•	 	 Band 3 (Director) – 6-months Pay 


  

	 	•	 	 Band 4 (Manager) and Band 5 (support personnel) – 3-months Pay 



HOWEVER, if a Change of Control (as defined in the Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive
Plan as amended from time to time (“Incentive Plan”)) occurs and the employment of an employee of the Corporation or its affiliates employed at the time of the Change of Control is terminated by reason of, on or within two years after the
Change of Control for any reason other Cause as defined in the Incentive Plan, the above-listed severance schedule shall provide the minimum severance payable in a lump sum to such employee. 

NOTWITHSTANDING anything to the contrary herein and subject to payment in conformity with section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, to the extent applicable, to the extent an employee has a written agreement from the Corporation relating to severance, such employee shall be entitled to the greater of (1) the severance provided under the Severance
Program or (2) the severance provided under such employee’s written agreement; however, in no event shall such employee be entitled to receive severance under both the Severance Program and its written agreement. 

This Severance Program may be amended or terminated at any time; provided, however, this Severance Program shall not be amended or
terminated to the detriment of any employee of the Corporation in anticipation of, by reason of or with respect to any employee employed immediately prior to the Change of Control, on or within two years after a Change of Control.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—SOLDIERS' AND SAILORS' HOMESTEAD
#### § 201.16 Default provision.

The loan note shall contain a provision for acceleration of maturity, at the option of the holder, upon a default by the borrower.
### §1903. Rangelands inventory and management; public availability

(a) Following enactment of this chapter, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture shall update, develop (where necessary) and maintain on a continuing basis thereafter, an inventory of range conditions and record of trends of range conditions on the public rangelands, and shall categorize or identify such lands on the basis of the range conditions and trends thereof as they deem appropriate. Such inventories shall be conducted and maintained by the Secretary as a part of the inventory process required by section 201(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (43 U.S.C. 1711), and by the Secretary of Agriculture in accordance with section 1603 of title 16; shall be kept current on a regular basis so as to reflect changes in range conditions; and shall be available to the public.

(b) The Secretary shall manage the public rangelands in accordance with the Taylor Grazing Act (43 U.S.C. 315–315(o)), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701–1782), and other applicable law consistent with the public rangelands improvement program pursuant to this chapter. Except where the land use planning process required pursuant to section 202 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (43 U.S.C. 1712) determines otherwise or the Secretary determines, and sets forth his reasons for this determination, that grazing uses should be discontinued (either temporarily or permanently) on certain lands, the goal of such management shall be to improve the range conditions of the public rangelands so that they become as productive as feasible in accordance with the rangeland management objectives established through the land use planning process, and consistent with the values and objectives listed in sections 1901(a) and (b)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–514, §4, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1805.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 94–579, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2743, which is classified principally to chapter 35 (§1701 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of this title and Tables.

The Taylor Grazing Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 28, 1934, ch. 865, 48 Stat. 1269, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§315 et seq.) of chapter 8A of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 315 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT
99.4





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS





We consent
to the use of our reports dated March 16, 2009 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Vermilion Energy Trust (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States of America
Reporting Difference relating to changes in accounting
principles)  and the effectiveness of Vermilion Energy Trust’s
internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F of Vermilion Energy Trust for the year ended December 31,
2008.








“/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP”





Independent
Registered Chartered Accountants


Calgary,
Canada


March 16,
2009
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Luggage Workers Union, Local 60, ILGP & NWU, Respondent, and Major Moulders, Inc., Appellant.

Order, denying defendant’s motion to stay arbitration, dated April 14, 1960, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion to stay the arbitration is granted, with $10 costs. Appellant entered into an agreement with the union wherein it was provided that within 30 days from the date thereof, the parties would enter into a “full length collective bargaining agreement with the Union upon the same terms and conditions as provided in the Union’s contracts with Employers in the Industry generally, except in the following specific respects”. No copy of the so-called general industry contract was annexed. No such later agreement was entered into. Any dispute which might arise under the initial agreement was to be “settled in the same manner as will be provided in the collective bargaining agreement to be entered into as hereinabove stated ”. In effect, the union was seeking arbitration under a collective agreement that was never consummated. That unexecuted agreement was to contain the provisions for the machinery of arbitration. Without such a binding collective agreement, there was no effective commitment by the parties to arbitrate. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0480 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-090-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model SA-365N, SA-365N1, AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 

155B, EC155B1, AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and EC225LP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 65 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the pilot and co-pilot seats and 

subsequent injury to the pilot or co-pilot.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $30,251 for the replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(0.2 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour for the 

inspection)

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the replacement)

$17

$85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $17 for the inspection

$30,336 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $1,105 for the inspection

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant