alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3771. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3771 was editorially reclassified as section 10211 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3771, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §701, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1198, contained Congressional statement of purpose for training and manpower development, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 98–473.

For another prior section 3771, see note set out preceding section 3750 of this title.

Prior sections 3772 to 3775 were omitted in the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §609A(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2090.

Section 3772, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §702, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1198, provided for a program to train prosecuting attorneys.

A prior section 702 of Pub. L. 90–351, title I, as added Pub. L. 94–430, §2, Sept. 29, 1976, 90 Stat. 1347, provided limits on the payment of public safety officers' death benefits and was classified to former section 3796a of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–157.

Section 3773, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §703, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1198, provided for a program to train State and local criminal justice personnel.

A prior section 703 of Pub. L. 90–351, as added Pub. L. 94–430, §2, Sept. 29, 1976, 90 Stat. 1347, defined the terms used in the provisions for public safety officers' death benefits and was classified to former section 3796b of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–157.

Section 3774, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §704, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1199, related to the training of State and local criminal justice personnel by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

A prior section 704 of Pub. L. 96–351, title I, as added Pub. L. 94–430, §2, Sept. 29, 1976, 90 Stat. 1347, provided for the administration of the program of public safety officers' death benefits and was classified to former section 3796c of this title, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–157.

Section 3775, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §705, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1199; amended Pub. L. 96–88, title III, §§301(a)(1), 305, title V, §507, Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 677, 680, 692, authorized a criminal justice education program.

For other prior sections 3772 to 3774, see note set out preceding section 3750 of this title.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2784 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Omite Tech. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Omite Tech. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OMITE TECH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.95 Sulfurous acid, 2[4(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenoxy]cyclohexyl-2- 

propynylester (CA) (CAS 

No. 2312–35–8) (provided 

for in subheading 

2920.90.10) ......................... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2784 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### § 306.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish a procedure for the filing, investigation, and administrative determination of allegations of discrimination (including harassment) based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age (40 or over), disability or other bases provided for in applicable statutes, regulations or the Peace Corps Manual or history of participation in the Peace Corps discrimination complaint process which arise in connection with the recruitment, selection, placement, service, or termination of applicants, trainees, or volunteers. In addition, any Peace Corps applicant, trainee, or volunteer may submit an allegation of discrimination to the Peace Corps Office of Inspector General at any time, and the allegation will be processed in accordance with policy and procedures of the Office of Inspector General.
#### § 1000.510 What happens if tribal monitoring identifies compliance concerns?

The Indian tribe shall have the responsibility to ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AR-910-0777-XP-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting and tour of the Arizona 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC).
    The business meeting will be held on January 25, 2005, at the 
Bureau of Land Management National Training Center located at 9828 
North 31st Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. It will begin at 9 a.m. and 
conclude at 4 p.m. The agenda items to be covered include: Review of 
the October 27, 2004, Meeting Minutes; BLM State Director's Update on 
Statewide Issues; RAC Orientation on BLM Programs and Arizona BLM 
Priorities, Presentations on Transportation and Rights-of-Way, and 
Collecting and Interpreting Rangeland Health Monitoring Data; Arizona 
Land Use Planning Updates; RAC Questions on Written Reports from BLM 
Field Managers; Field Office Rangeland Resource Team Proposals; Reports 
by the Standards and Guidelines, Recreation, Off-Highway Vehicle Use, 
Public Relations, Land Use Planning and Tenure, and Wild Horse and 
Burro Working Groups; Reports from RAC members; and Discussion of 
future meetings. A public comment period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. 
on January 25, 2005, for any interested publics who wish to address the 
Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land 
Management, Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, 
Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 417-9215.

Elaine Y. Zielinski,
Arizona State Director.
[FR Doc. 04-28381 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4130-32-M
#### § 511.12 When litigation is involved in claim.

If a claimant does not agree to a settlement of a claim of which is considered fair and equitable by the Board's responsible officials, the claimant, upon the final disposition thereof by the Board, may elect to file suit. Relief from claims which are disallowed may be sought by filing suit in the U.S. District Court for the district where the claimant resides or wherein the act of omission complained of occurred. The failure of the Board to make final disposition of a claim within 6 months after it has been filed shall, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2672, and at the option of the claimant at any time thereafter, is deemed a final denial of the claim. If a suit is filed against the Government involving the Board, the Department of Justice will request the Board to furnish the complete file on the case. The Office of the General Counsel will represent the Board in all negotiations with the Department of Justice.
### §8108. Warnings to homeowners of foreclosure rescue scams

#### (a) Assistance to NRC

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, of any amounts made available for any fiscal year pursuant to section 1701x(a)(4)(F) of title 12 (as added by section 1444),1 10 percent shall be used only for assistance to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation for activities, in consultation with servicers of residential mortgage loans, to provide notice to borrowers under such loans who are delinquent with respect to payments due under such loans that makes such borrowers aware of the dangers of fraudulent activities associated with foreclosure.

#### (b) Notice

The Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, in consultation with servicers of residential mortgage loans, shall use the amounts provided pursuant to subsection (a) to carry out activities to inform borrowers under residential mortgage loans—

(1) that the foreclosure process is complex and can be confusing;

(2) that the borrower may be approached during the foreclosure process by persons regarding saving their home and they should use caution in any such dealings;

(3) that there are Federal Government and nonprofit agencies that may provide information about the foreclosure process, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development;

(4) that they should contact their lender immediately, contact the Department of Housing and Urban Development to find a housing counseling agency certified by the Department to assist in avoiding foreclosure, or visit the Department's website regarding tips for avoiding foreclosure; and

(5) of the telephone number of the loan servicer or successor, the telephone number of the Department of Housing and Urban Development housing counseling line, and the Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) for the Department of Housing and Urban Development Web sites for housing counseling and for tips for avoiding foreclosure.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title XIV, §1452, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2177.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1444, referred to in subsec. (a), means section 1444 of Pub. L. 111–203.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Expand and Preserve Home Ownership Through Counseling Act and also as part of the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act and as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and not as part of the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date on which final regulations implementing such section take effect, or on the date that is 18 months after the designated transfer date if such regulations have not been issued by that date, see section 1400(c) of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 1601 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

1 See References in Text note below.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIBERATO CABALO and WILTHELMACABALO,

Plaintiffs,

    v.

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants                                                                      /

No. C-08-5667 MMC

ORDER OF REFERENCE TOMAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALLFURTHER PROCEEDINGS UPONCONSENT; VACATING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE 

All parties having consented to assignment of the above-titled matter to a United

States Magistrate Judge, and a preference having been stated for Magistrate Judge Maria-

Elena James, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is referred to Magistrate Judge

Maria-Elena James for all further proceedings and entry of judgment.  Appeal from the

judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Conference previously

scheduled to be conducted on March 5, 2010 before the undersigned is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  March 3, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05667-MEJ   Document 48   Filed 03/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T04:36:06-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2710 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-[[4- 

chloro-6-[(3-sulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]ami no]-4-hydroxy-3- 

[[4-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]- , sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-[[4-chloro-6-[(3- 

sulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]ami no]-4-hydroxy3-[[4-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]- , sodium 

salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2710 IH 

1 SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 5-[[4- 

2 CHLORO-6-[(3-SULFOPHENYL)AMINO]-1,3,5- 

3 TRIAZIN-2-YL]AMINO]-4-HYDROXY-3-[[4-[[2- 

4 (SULFOOXY)ETHYL]SULFONYL]PHENYL]AZO]-, 

5 SODIUM SALT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.15 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid, 5-[[4-chloro-6-[(3- 

sulfophenyl)amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[[4-[[2- 

(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]-, 

sodium salt. (CAS No. 

78952–61–1) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.16.30) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §4027b. Assessment of claims-paying ability

#### (1) Assessment

#### (A) Assessment required

#### (i) In general

Not later than September 30 of each year, the Administrator shall conduct an assessment of the ability of the National Flood Insurance Program to pay claims.

#### (ii) Private market reinsurance

The assessment under this paragraph for any year in which the Administrator exercises the authority under section 4055(a)(2) of this title, as added by this section,1 to secure reinsurance of coverage provided by the National Flood Insurance Program from the private market shall include information relating the use of private sector reinsurance and reinsurance equivalents by the Administrator, whether or not the Administrator used the borrowing authority under section 4016 of this title.

#### (iii) First assessment

The Administrator shall conduct the first assessment required under this paragraph not later than September 30, 2012.

#### (B) Considerations

In conducting an assessment under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall take into consideration regional concentrations of coverage written by the National Flood Insurance Program, peak flood zones, and relevant mitigation measures.

#### (2) Annual report of the Administrator of activities under the National Flood Insurance Program

The Administrator shall—

(A) include the results of each assessment in the report required under section 4027a of this title; and

(B) not later than 30 days after the date on which the Administrator completes an assessment required under paragraph (1), make the results of the assessment available to the public.

(Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, §100232(e), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 955.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This section, referred to in par. (1)(A)(ii), means section 100232 of Pub. L. 112–141, which enacted this section and amended sections 4051, 4052, 4055, 4082, and 4121 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012, and also as part of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, also known as the MAP–21, and not as part of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 4004 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

#### § 17.87 Determination of indebtedness.

In determining that an employee is indebted to HUD, the Secretary will review the debt to make sure that it is valid and past due.
1

NUMBER 13-13-00503-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ROEL CERDA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Roel Cerda, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on 

September 20, 2013, through which he seeks to compel the trial court to consider and 

rule on relator’s motion for nunc pro tunc judgment. 

To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must establish both that he has no 

adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and that what he seeks to compel 

is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. State ex rel. Young 

v. Sixth Jud. Dist. Ct. of App. at Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

 

1

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is 

not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

2007) (orig. proceeding). If relator fails to meet both of these requirements, then the 

petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See id. 

It is relator’s burden to properly request and show entitlement to mandamus 

relief. Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. 

proceeding) (“Even a pro se applicant for a writ of mandamus must show himself 

entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”). In addition to other requirements, relator 

must include a statement of facts supported by citations to “competent evidence 

included in the appendix or record,” and must also provide “a clear and concise 

argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the 

appendix or record.” See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. In this regard, the relator must 

furnish an appendix or record sufficient to support the claim for mandamus relief. See

id. R. 52.3(k) (specifying the required contents for the appendix); R. 52.7(a) (specifying 

the required contents for the record).

Relator has not included with his petition an appendix or record sufficient to 

support his claim for relief. Accordingly, the Court, having examined and fully 

considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the applicable law, is of the opinion 

that relator has not met his burden to obtain mandamus relief. See State ex rel. Young, 

236 S.W.3d at 210. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 25th

day of September, 2013.
#### Peter Spanos et al., as Directors of Scott’s Beach Club, Inc., Appellants, v Marie Boschen, Respondent.

In an action, *inter alia,*to vacate the release of a restrictive covenant, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 25, 1977, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiffs brought this action jointly, as directors of Scott’s Beach Club, Inc., to nullify a release of a restrictive covenant *838granted to defendant. There is nothing in the record to indicate that this action is being taken in the right of the corporation or that these directors acted formally as a board of directors in bringing suit. Despite the fact that the named plaintiffs constitute four fifths of the board and are also officers of the beach club, they may not bring this action in the right of the club, which is a New York not-for-profit corporation, without acting formally as a board of directors (see *Douglas Dev. Corp. v Carillo,*64 NYS2d 747). The powers of a director acting as an individual are strictly limited, and properly so *(Bayer v Beran,*49 NYS2d 2). The management of a not-for-profit corporation is vested in its board, not in its directors acting individually (Not-for-Profit Corporation Law, § 701). To allow individual directors to bring actions for the benefit of their corporation against parties who themselves are neither directors nor officers would be unfair to prospective defendants. Such persons could be subjected to multiple suits or to suits by individual directors who disagree with a determination made by the corporation that no suit is warranted. The plaintiffs will not be deprived of all remedies by dismissal of this action since they may still be able to bring suit either acting as board of directors on behalf of the corporation, or, perhaps, in a derivative action under section 623 of the Not-for-Profit Corporation Law. Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN ARLIN PRICE, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3968

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 6, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Daniel L. Perry, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.