alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

9/24/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00183-CR

SCOTT, JOHNNY CALVIN Tr. Ct. No. 1359184R PD-0850-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, October 16, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

JOHNNY CALVIN SCOTT

TDC# 1927796

CLEMENTS UNIT

9601 SPUR 591

AMARILLO, TX 79107

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

9/24/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00183-CR

SCOTT, JOHNNY CALVIN Tr. Ct. No. 1359184R PD-0850-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, October 16, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

DISTRICT ATTORNEY TARRANT COUNTY

SHAREN WILSON

401 WEST BELKNAP

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

9/24/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00183-CR

SCOTT, JOHNNY CALVIN Tr. Ct. No. 1359184R PD-0850-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, October 16, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

9/24/2015 COA Case No. 02-14-00183-CR

SCOTT, JOHNNY CALVIN Tr. Ct. No. 1359184R PD-0850-15

On this day, this Court has granted the Appellant’s Pro Se motion for an extension

of time in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the

petition has been extended to Friday, October 16, 2015. NO FURTHER

EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary

Review must be filed with The Court of Criminal Appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
### §8262. Definitions

For purposes of this subtitle— 1

(1) the term "agency" means 2 has the meaning given such term in section 551(1) of title 5, except that such term does not include the United States Postal Service;

(2) the term "facility energy supervisor" means the employee with responsibility for the daily operations of a Federal facility, including the management, installation, operation, and maintenance of energy systems in Federal facilities which may include more than one building;

(3) the term "trained energy manager" means a person who has demonstrated proficiency, or who has completed a course of study in the areas of fundamentals of building energy systems, building energy codes and applicable professional standards, energy accounting and analysis, life-cycle cost methodology, fuel supply and pricing, and instrumentation for energy surveys and audits;

(4) the term "Task Force" means the Interagency Energy Management Task Force established under section 8257 of this title; and

(5) the term "energy conservation measures" has the meaning given such term in section 8259(4) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §151, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2843.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle F (§§151–168) of title I of Pub. L. 102–486, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2843, which enacted this section and sections 8258a, 8258b, 8262a to 8262k of this title, amended sections 8252 to 8256, 8258, 8259, 8287, and 8287c of this title and section 490 of former Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works, enacted provisions set out as notes under section 8262h of this title and former section 1815 of Title 2, The Congress, and repealed provisions set out as a note under section 8253 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle F to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original. The word "means" probably should not appear.
### §§2984, 2984a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section 2984, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §731, as added Pub. L. 92–424, §25(a), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 701; amended Pub. L. 93–644, §10(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2319; Pub. L. 94–341, §2(b)(4), (5), 90 Stat. 805, 806; Pub. L. 95–568, §§14(h), 17(a)(37), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2438, 2443, set forth prerequisites, etc., for development loans for community economic development programs.

Section 2984a, Pub. L. 88–452, title VII, §732, as added Pub. L. 92–424, §25(a), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 702; amended Pub. L. 93–644, §10(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2320; Pub. L. 94–341, §2(b)(6), July 6, 1976, 90 Stat. 806; Pub. L. 95–568, §14(i), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2438, related to Model Community Economic Development Finance Corporation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.
Stipulation and [proposed] Order 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT A. SUGARMAN (No. 68277) 

SUGARMAN & CANNON 

44 Montgomery St., Suite 2080 

San Francisco, CA. 94104 

Telephone: (415) 362-6252 

Facsimile: (415) 677-9445 

Attorneys for Defendant

 JOSE ROMERO 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

JOSE ROMERO,

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-0521 MMC 

STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO 

ADVANCE SENTENCING 

DATE

 This matter is currently scheduled for sentencing before this Court on May 12, 

2010.

 Defendant Romero’s two codefendants are scheduled for sentencing on April 21, 

2010; they entered guilty pleas a few weeks prior to defendant Romero’s guilty plea. At 

the time that defendant Romero entered his guilty plea, defendant’s counsel suggested that 

defendant Romero be sentenced on the same date as his codefendants. However the Court 

was concerned that the Probation Officer have sufficient time to investigate and prepare 

the Presentence Report, and thus set sentencing for May 12, 2010. 

AND ORDER THEREON

Case 3:09-cr-00521-MMC Document 36 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation and [proposed] Order 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Undersigned counsel for defendant Romero discussed the date for sentencing with 

U.S. Probation Officer Sara Rizor Black, who is preparing the Presentence Reports on 

defendant Romero and both of his codefendants. Ms. Black informed counsel that there 

would not be sufficient time to prepare her report to sentence defendant Romero on April 

21, 2010, but that she would have sufficient time if sentencing is advanced to May 5, 2010. 

She is agreeable to advancing sentencing for defendant Romero to that date. 

 Defendant Romero has been in custody in North County Jail and would like to be 

sentenced as soon as possible. 

 The parties stipulate to advance sentencing from May 12, 2010 to May 5, 2010 at 

2:30 p.m. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

DATED: March 25, 2010 ______/s/________________

W.S. Wilson Leung 

Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: March 25, 2010 /s/ 

Scott A. Sugarman 

Attorney for Jose Romero 

SO ORDERED. 

DATE: __________________________________

 Maxine M. Chesney 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

March 29, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-00521-MMC Document 36 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 2004.22 Filing requirements for demands or requests for documents or testimony. You must comply with the following requirements whenever you issue demands or requests to an OIG employee for official records and information or testimony. ( a ) Your request must be in writing and must be submitted to the Counsel. If you serve a subpoena on OIG or on an OIG employee before submitting a written request and receiving a final determination from the Counsel, OIG will oppose the subpoena on grounds that your request was not submitted in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) Your written request must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved;
( 2 ) A copy of the complaint or equivalent document setting forth the assertions in the case and any other pleading or document sufficient to show relevance;
( 3 ) A list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony or records sought;
( 4 ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs the need to maintain any confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on OIG to produce the records or provide testimony;
( 5 ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than an OIG employee, such as a retained expert;
( 6 ) If testimony is requested, the intended use of the testimony, a general summary of the desired testimony, and a showing that no document could be provided and used in lieu of testimony;
( 7 ) A description of all prior decisions, orders, or pending motions in the case that bear upon the relevance of the requested records or testimony;
( 8 ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case; and
( 9 ) An estimate of the amount of time that the requester and other parties will require with each OIG employee for time spent by the employee to prepare for testimony, in travel, and for attendance in the legal proceeding.
( c ) The OIG reserves the right to require additional information to complete your request where appropriate.
( d ) Your request should be submitted at least 30 days before the date that records or testimony are required. Requests submitted less than 30 days before records or testimony are required must be accompanied by a written explanation stating the reasons for the late request and the reasons for expedited processing.
( e ) Failure to cooperate in good faith to enable the Counsel to make an informed decision may serve as the basis for a determination not to comply with your request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sha-La God, Also Known as Robert Miller, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 14, 1974, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of grand larceny in the third degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. This court has already decided all of the issues raised on this appeal (see People *v God,*56 AD2d 636). Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.
### §7237. Priority placement, job placement, retraining, and counseling programs for United States Department of Energy employees affected by reduction in force

#### (a) Definitions

(1) For the purposes of this section, the term "agency" means the United States Department of Energy.

(2) For the purposes of this section, the term "eligible employee" means any employee of the agency who—

(A) is scheduled to be separated from service due to a reduction in force under—

(i) regulations prescribed under section 3502 of title 5; or

(ii) procedures established under section 3595 of title 5; or

(B) is separated from service due to such a reduction in force, but does not include—

(i) an employee separated from service for cause on charges of misconduct or delinquency; or

(ii) an employee who, at the time of separation, meets the age and service requirements for an immediate annuity under subchapter III of chapter 83 or chapter 84 of title 5.

#### (b) Priority placement and retraining program

Not later than 30 days after September 30, 1996, the United States Department of Energy shall establish an agency-wide priority placement and retraining program for eligible employees.

#### (c) Filling vacancy from outside agency

The priority placement program established under subsection (b) shall include provisions under which a vacant position shall not be filled by the appointment or transfer of any individual from outside of the agency if—

(1) there is then available any eligible employee who applies for the position within 30 days of the agency issuing a job announcement and is qualified (or can be trained or retrained to become qualified within 90 days of assuming the position) for the position; and

(2) the position is within the same commuting area as the eligible employee's last-held position or residence.

#### (d) Job placement and counseling services

The head of the agency may establish a program to provide job placement and counseling services to eligible employees. A program established under subsection (d) may include, but is not limited to, such services as—

(1) career and personal counseling;

(2) training and job search skills; and

(3) job placement assistance, including assistance provided through cooperative arrangements with State and local employment services offices.

(Pub. L. 104–206, title III, §301, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 2999.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.410 Definition of term “applicant”. ( a ) In any mortgage or loan insurance transaction under this chapter where the Commissioner will control the mortgagor either through the ownership of corporate stock or under the provisions of a regulatory agreement, the term *applicant* as used in § 200.415 shall mean the mortgagor.
( b ) In any transaction other than one specified in paragraph (a) of this section, the term *applicant* as used in § 200.415 shall mean the developer, or the builder, dealer or contractor performing the construction, repair or rehabilitation work for the property owner.
1 

Woodward v. Ahern, et al./Case #C09-0203 CRB (NJV) 

Order Granting Defendants’ Request To Be Excused From Appearing In Person Or By 

Telephone At July 8, 2010 Settlement Conference 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VICTOR WOODARD, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

GREGORY AHERN, Sheriff Alameda 

County; BURT WILCONSON, Facility 

Captain, Alameda County Jail; JOHN DOE, 

Classification Lt. Alameda County Jail; DR. 

JOHN/JANE DOE, MD, Chief Medical 

Officer, Alameda County Jail; DEPUTY 

CHIN, Alameda County Jail; DEPUTY 

ARIVAS, Alameda County Jail, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

Case No.: C09-0203 CRB/NJV 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

REQUEST TO BE EXCUSED FROM 

APPEARING IN PERSON OR BY 

TELEPHONE AT JULY 8, 2010 

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

 Defendants DEPUTY C. CHIN and DEPUTY G. ARRIVAS have requested to be 

excused from personally attending the July 9, 2010 settlement conference, or from being 

available by telephone for the duration of the settlement conference. 

 Attending in their place will be a representative of Alameda County, who has full 

authorization to settle the case. 

 Good cause appearing, 

 The request by defendants DEPUTY C. CHIN and DEPUTY G. ARRIVAS to be 

excused from the conference is hereby granted. 

Dated: June 25, 2010 

 

 Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas 

Case 3:09-cv-00203-CRB Document 44 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kroll Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven L. Ford, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Steven L. Ford
-------------------------
Steven L. Ford
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Larva del ALB

Z

Ninfa del ALB con <<frass>>

Z

Z

Pasos Finales en la Erradicación del 

Escarabajo Asiático de Cuerno Largo

Para más información Ingrese a la página de internet http://www.aphis.usda.gov 

y seleccione el Escarabajo Asiático de Cuerno 

Largo bajo el título “Hot Issues” 

(Temas de Actualidad), en página 2.

El escarabajo asiático de cuerno largo (ALB, por sus siglas en inglés: Asian Longhorned 

Beetle) no se declarará erradicado en Illinois hasta que el Programa Cooperativo de 

Erradicación del ALB confirme que los tratamientos químicos de los árboles, las inspecciones 

a nivel del suelo y de la parte áerea, y la remoción de los árboles infectados hayan arrojado 

el resultado deseado: que hasta el último ALB fue 

encontrado y destruido. 

De haber un escarabajo en alguna parte, usted 

puede ayudar a que el Programa de ALB lo 

encuentre. 

El ALB se encuentra en actividad desde la 

primavera hasta el otoño y prefiere árboles 

de madera dura, tales como todas las 

especies de arces, abedules, olmos, castaños de Indias, álamos, sauces y fresnos.

El ALB se distingue por:

Gran tamaño, alrededor de 1,5 pulgadas de largo Color negro brillante con puntos blancos

Largas antenas con bandas en negro y blanco Patas con un ligero matiz blanco azulado

Busque estas señales:

 Los escarabajos dejan un residuo semejante al aserrín, llamado “frass”, en la base de los árboles 

y en las ramas.

Los ALB dejan agujeros de salida redondos en las ramas y troncos de los árboles.

 Los ALB hembras mastican la corteza de los árboles y producen hoyos del tamaño de las monedas de diez centavos donde depositan sus huevos.

Las larvas de ALB excavan túneles profundos en los árboles.

 Durante los meses de primavera y verano, los ALB adultos pueden encontrarse no sólo en los 

árboles sino en cualquier otra parte. 

Por favor, búsquelos e informe. Ya sea que observe o no signos de un ALB, reporte los resultados 

de la búsqueda en la página de internet, siguiendo las instrucciones en <http://beetlebusters. 

aphis.usda.gov>. Usted también puede llamar al Programa Cooperativo de Erradicación del ALB 

al 847–298–4540 de lunes a viernes entre las 8:00 y las 16:30 horas.

En Illinois, el Programa Cooperativo de Erradicación del Escarabajo Asiático de Cuerno Largo está compuesto por 

el Servicio Forestal y el Servicio de Inspección de Sanidad Agropecuaria pertenecientes al Departamento de 

Agricultura de los Estados Unidos, junto con el gobierno de la Ciudad de Chicago y el Departamento de 

Agricultura de Illinois.

El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece igualdad 

de oportunidades.

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

Z

ALB cerca de un agujero de la salida

Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

Servicio de Inspección de Sanidad Agropecuaria

Programa de Ayuda No. 1927S, Publicado en julio de 2007
### §9303. Program activities

#### (a) Development in areas where lack of knowledge limits magnetic fusion energy systems

The Secretary shall initiate activities or accelerate existing activities in research areas in which the lack of knowledge limits magnetic fusion energy systems in order to ensure the achievement of the purposes of this chapter.

#### (b) Research programs on plasma confinement, alternate confinement concepts, advanced fuels, and properties of materials likely to be used in construction of fusion engineering devices

(1) The Secretary shall maintain an aggressive plasma confinement research program on the current lead concept to provide a full measure of support for the design, construction, and operation of the fusion engineering devices.

(2) The Secretary shall maintain a broadly based research program on alternate confinement concepts and on advanced fuels at a sufficient level of funding to achieve optimal design of each successive magnetic fusion facility using the then best available confinement and fuel concept.

(3) The Secretary shall ensure that research on properties of materials likely to be required for the construction of fusion engineering devices is adequate to provide timely information for the design of such devices.

#### (c) Fusion engineering device designs

(1) The Secretary shall initiate design activities on a fusion engineering device using the best available confinement concept to ensure operation of such a device at the earliest practicable time, but not later than the year 1990.

(2) The Secretary shall develop and test the adequacy of the engineering design of components to be utilized in the fusion engineering device.

#### (d) Operation of demonstration plant at turn of twenty-first century

The Secretary shall initiate at the earliest practical time each activity which he deems necessary to achieve the national goal for operation of a demonstration plant at the turn of the twenty-first century.

#### (e) Assessment of factors in determining commercial introduction of magnetic fusion energy systems

The Secretary shall continue efforts to assess factors which will determine the commercial introduction of magnetic fusion energy systems including, but not limited to—

(1) projected costs relative to other alternative energy sources;

(2) projected growth rates in energy demand;

(3) safety-related design limitations;

(4) environmental impacts; and

(5) limitations on the availability of strategic elements, such as helium, lithium, and special metals.

(Pub. L. 96–386, §4, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1540.)