alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 108.40 Compliance reviews. ( a ) *General.* All compliance reviews shall be conducted by the civil rights/compliance reviewing office. Complaints alleging a violation(s) of the AFHM regulations, or information ascertained in the absence of a complaint indicating an applicant's failure to comply with an AFHM plan, shall be referred immediately to the civil rights/compliance reviewing office. The monitoring office shall be notified as appropriate of all alleged violations of the AFHM regulations or alleged failure to comply with an AFHM plan.
( b ) *Initiation of compliance reviews.* Even in the absence of a complaint or other information indicating noncompliance pursuant to paragraph (a), the civil rights/compliance reviewing office may conduct periodic compliance reviews throughout the life of the mortgage in the case of multi-family projects and throughout the duration of the Housing Assistance Payments Contract with the Department in the case of housing assisted under section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1437.
( c ) *Nature of compliance reviews.* The purpose of a compliance review is to determine whether the applicant is in compliance with the Department's AFHM requirements and the applicant's approved AFHM plan. Where allegations under this part may also constitute a violation of the provisions of Executive Order 11063 or title VIII, the review will also determine compliance with the requirements thereof. The applicant shall be given at least five (5) days notice of the time set for any compliance review and the place or places for such review. The compliance review will cover the following areas: ( 1 ) Applicant's sales and rental practices, including practices in soliciting buyers and tenants, determining eligibility, selecting and rejecting buyers and renters, and in concluding sales and rental transactions.
( 2 ) Programs to attract minority and majority buyers and renters regardless of sex, including: ( i ) Use of advertising media, brochures, and pamphlets;
( ii ) Conformance with both the Department's Fair Housing Poster Regulation (24 CFR part 110) and the Advertising Guidelines for Fair Housing (37 FR 6700) and any revisions thereto.
( 3 ) Data relating to: ( i ) The size and location of units;
( ii ) Services provided;
( iii ) Sales and/or rental price ranges;
( iv ) The race and sex of buyers and/or renters;
( v ) Race and sex of staff engaged in sale or rental of dwellings.
( 4 ) Other matters relating to the marketing or sales of dwellings under HUD affirmative marketing requirements, the AFMH Plan and this part.
[44 FR 47013, Aug. 9, 1979, as amended at 64 FR 44096, Aug. 12, 1999]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0016 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RILEY JOSEPH LANDWEHR,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 1 2022

11/01/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0016
### §1511. Reconnaissance investigations by Secretary of the Interior; reports; 10-year moratorium on water importation studies

Pursuant to the authority set out in the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, and Acts amendatory thereof or supplementary thereto, and the provisions of the Water Resources Planning Act of July 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 244, as amended [42 U.S.C. 1962 et seq.], with respect to the coordination of studies, investigations and assessments, the Secretary of the Interior shall conduct full and complete reconnaissance investigations for the purpose of developing a general plan to meet the future water needs of the Western United States. Such investigations shall include the long-range water supply available and the long-range water requirements in each water resource region of the Western United States. Progress reports in connection with these investigations shall be submitted to the President, the National Water Commission (while it is in existence), the Water Resources Council, and to the Congress every two years. The first of such reports shall be submitted on or before June 30, 1971, and a final reconnaissance report shall be submitted not later than June 30, 1977: Provided, That for a period of ten years from November 2, 1978, any Federal official shall not undertake reconnaissance studies of any plan for the importation of water into the Colorado River Basin from any other natural river drainage basin lying outside the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, and those portions of Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming which are in the natural drainage basin of the Colorado River.

(Pub. L. 90–537, title II, §201, Sept. 30, 1968, 82 Stat. 886; Pub. L. 95–578, §10, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2472; Pub. L. 96–375, §10, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1507.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388, referred to in text, is classified generally to chapter 12 (§371 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 371 of this title and Tables.

The Water Resources Planning Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 89–80, July 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 244, as amended, which is classified generally to chapter 19B (§1962 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1962 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–375 substituted "any Federal official" for "the Secretary" in proviso.

1978—Pub. L. 95–578 substituted "November 2, 1978" for "September 30, 1968".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of National Water Commission

National Water Commission, established by Pub. L. 90–515, Sept. 26, 1968, 82 Stat. 868, terminated Sept. 26, 1973.
### §5714–24. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5714–24 was editorially reclassified as section 11244 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §6732. Withholding of payments for failure to comply with statement of assurances; procedures applicable

Whenever the Secretary, after affording reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing to any State or unit of local government, finds that there has been a failure to comply substantially with any assurance set forth in the statement of assurances of that State or units of local government filed under section 6725 of this title, the Secretary shall notify that State or unit of local government that further payments will not be made under this subchapter until he is satisfied that there is no longer any such failure to comply. Until he is so satisfied, no further payments shall be made under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title II, §212, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 1009.)
Docket Management Facility

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 205590
To Whom It May Concern: Sierra Air Helicopters hereby petitions for exemption from Part 120 of Title 1 4, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to allow Sierra Air Helicopters to cover its safety sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. Sierra Air Helicopters operates under a single pilot FAR 135 (Cert. #2SHA280M) and holds a LOA (LO A #WP6JWP25) for sightseeing operations. Due to the small number of employee’s, two , and the fact that only 1 employee serves in both capacities , there would be no reduction in safety involved. The public would be benefited by reduction of redundant admi nistrative burden as a whole. Similar exemptions have been issued for small companies such as ours, where many types of functions are combined due to small markets. Respectfully submitted,

John Crawford DER / Owner Sierra Air Helicopters 2409 Rickenb acker Way Auburn, Ca 95602 (530)823

- 7400 office (916)223

- 1297 cell
#### § 203.416 Amount and items of certificate of claim.

The certificate shall be for an amount which the Commissioner determines to be sufficient to pay all amounts due under the mortgage and not covered by the amount of debentures and cash adjustment check. The certificate shall include a reasonable amount for necessary expenses incurred by the mortgagee in connection with the foreclosure proceedings or the acquisition of the mortgaged property otherwise and the conveyance thereof to the Commissioner, including reasonable attorneys' fees, unpaid interest, and cost of repairs to the property made by the mortgagee to remedy the waste.
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 11.0
                      Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
                Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
              (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS            THREE MONTHS
                                                                      ENDED                  ENDED
                                                                    MARCH 31,              MARCH 31,
                                                                      1998                   1997
                                                                ----------------        -----------------
<S>                                                               <C>                     <C>
Net income                                                         $     13,327            $      2,464
                                                                ----------------        -----------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding                           39,676,868              40,708,683
                                                                ----------------        -----------------
Basic earnings per common share                                    $       0.34            $       0.06
                                                                ================        =================
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
 
Potential common stock due to dilutive effect of stock options            2,118                       -
                                                                ----------------        -----------------
Total shares for diluted earnings per share                          36,678,986              40,708,683
                                                                ----------------        -----------------
Diluted earnings per common share                                  $       0.34            $       0.06
                                                                ================        =================
</TABLE>

                                      27
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-10-00048-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ANTONIO C. MUÑOZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, Antonio C. Muñoz, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this

Court, complaining that the respondent, Laura Hinojosa, the District Clerk of Hidalgo

County, Texas, has not forwarded documents related to an article 11.07 writ of habeas

corpus to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art.

11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2008); see also In re Escareno, 297 S.W.3d 288 (Tex. Crim. App.

2009).
2

This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over district clerks unless it is

shown that issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T

CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (Vernon 2004); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex.

App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692

(Tex. App.–San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); see also In re Nubine, No. 13-08-507-CV,

2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 6534, at *1 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi Aug. 27, 2008, orig.

proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op). Moreover, while courts of appeals have mandamus

jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction

in final post-conviction felony proceedings. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 §

3 (Vernon Supp. 2008); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.–Houston [1st Dist.]

2001, orig. proceeding).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,

is of the opinion that we lack jurisdiction to consider this matter. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 8th

day of February, 2010.
#### § 1000.418 Can grant funds be used to pay costs incurred when issuing notes or other obligations?

Yes. Other costs that can be paid using grant funds include but are not limited to the costs of servicing and trust administration, and other costs associated with financing of debt obligations.
### §9141. Determinations under Merchant Marine Act, 1936

(a)(1) For the purposes of chapter 535 of title 46, any ocean thermal energy conversion facility or plantship licensed pursuant to this chapter, and any vessel providing shipping service to or from such an ocean thermal energy conversion facility or plantship, shall be deemed to be a vessel operated in the foreign commerce of the United States.

(2) The provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection shall apply for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1981.

(b) For the purposes of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 U.S.C. 1177 et seq.),1 any vessel documented under the laws of the United States and used in providing shipping service to or from any ocean thermal energy conversion facility or plantship licensed pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed to be used in, and used in an essential service in, the foreign commerce or foreign trade of the United States, as defined in section 109 of title 46.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title II, §201, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 991.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a)(1) and (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–320, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 974, known as the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9101 of this title and Tables.

The Merchant Marine Act, 1936, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 29, 1936, ch. 858, 49 Stat. 1985, which was classified principally to chapter 27 (§1101 et seq.) of the former Appendix to Title 46, Shipping. The Act, with the exception of title V, most of title VI, and sections 301, 801, 802, 809(a), and 909 thereof, was repealed and restated, mainly in subtitle V of Title 46, by Pub. L. 109–304, §§8, 19, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1555, 1710. Title V and sections 301 and 909 of the Act are set out as notes under section 53101 of Title 46. Those portions of title VI not repealed by Pub. L. 109–304 and sections 802 and 809(a) of the Act were repealed by Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §313(a), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 58. Section 801 of the Act was transferred to section 57522 of Title 46 by Pub. L. 114–120, title III, §313(c)(1)(A), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 58. For complete classification of the Act to the Code, see Tables. For disposition of sections of the former Appendix to Title 46, see Disposition Table preceding section 101 of Title 46.

#### Codification

In subsec. (a)(1), "chapter 535 of title 46" substituted for "section 607 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 U.S.C. 1177)" and in subsec. (b), "section 109 of title 46" substituted for "section 905(a) of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936 (46 U.S.C. 1244(a))" on authority of Pub. L. 109–304, §18(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1709, which Act enacted chapter 535 and section 109 of Title 46, Shipping.

1 See References in Text note below.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service 

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

The National Park Service (NPS) published a Notice of Availability on November 24, 2004 in accordance with Section 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, Subpart B, of a Plan of Operations submitted by Sanchez Oil and Gas Corporation for drilling and production of the WM Rice #1 Well from a surface location north of County Road 4825 within Big Thicket National Preserve, Tyler County, Texas. The notice also announced the availability of an accompanying Environmental Assessment and draft Floodplain and Wetland Statements of Findings. These documents are not, in fact, yet ready for review. When they are available, another notice will be published. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Dusty Pate, Range Technician, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701, Telephone: 409 839-2689 ext. 232, e-mail at                         *Haigler_Pate@nps.gov*.                     

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

Stephen P. Martin, 

Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service. 

[FR Doc. 04-28295 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312-CB-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10686

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER STENSON,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94-CR-57-2

- - - - - - - - - -

April 5, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Retained counsel for Joseph Christopher Stenson requests

permission to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Stenson has filed an initial and a supplemental

response as well as several motions. 

The evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict

convicting Stenson of conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute, and possession with intent to distribute, cocaine

base. United States v. Lewis, 902 F.2d 1176, 1180-81 (5th Cir. 
No. 95-10686

-2-

1990); United States v. Gardea Carrasco, 830 F.2d 41, 44 (5th

Cir. 1987). The Government did not breach the plea agreement. 

United States v. Watson, 988 F.2d 544, 548 (5th Cir. 1993), cert.

denied, 114 S. Ct. 698 (1994). Stenson's general allegations

cannot support a claim of selective prosecution. United States

v. Sparks, 2 F.3d 574, 580 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S.

Ct. 720, 899, 1548 (1994). Finally, Stenson's challenge on

vagueness grounds to the sentencing guidelines is foreclosed by

Fifth Circuit precedent. United States v. Fisher, 22 F.3d 574,

579 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 529 (1994). 

An independent review of counsel's brief, the points raised

by Stenson in his initial and supplemental responses to the

brief, and the record reveals no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. 

Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Accordingly, counsel's motion is

GRANTED and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

Stenson's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED as

moot. Stenson's motion for extension of time to file a

supplemental response is DENIED.
### SUBCHAPTER V—CLASSIFICATION OF LANDS TO PROVIDE FOR DISPOSAL OR INTERIM MANAGEMENT
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber

s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 18, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00620

- CV

Rosa Obregon PEREZ , Ricardo O. Perez, individually and as next friend of Rosa Elia Perez,

Maria Perez Jalomus, Juan Jose Perez, Julio Perez, Jr., and Fernando Perez,

Appellant s

v.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

, Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26130

Robert Cadena, Judge Presiding



### O R DER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is GRANTED. T he

appellant ’ s reply brief is due on March 18, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the sai d

court on this 18th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### §1462. Attestation of copies by official seal

All officers who furnish authenticated copies under section 1460 of this title shall attest their authentication by the use of an official seal, which is authorized for that purpose.

(Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 370, §4, 37 Stat. 498.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 491 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—EVIDENCES OF TITLE