alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77735-77739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28265]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 05-04]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/OPS-ADMIN, (703) 
604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 05-04 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 21, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 77736]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE04.000


[[Page 77737]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE04.001


[[Page 77738]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE04.002


[[Page 77739]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28DE04.003

[FR Doc. 04-28265 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
### **CHAPTER 36—OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT**

Sec.
1801.
Congressional findings.
1802.
Congressional declaration of purposes.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFSHORE OIL SPILL POLLUTION FUND

1811 to 1824. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—FISHERMEN'S CONTINGENCY FUND

1841.
Definitions.
1842.
Fishermen's Contingency Fund.
1843.
Duties and powers of Secretary.
1844.
Burden of proof.
1845.
Claims procedure.
1846, 1847. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

1861.
Repealed.
1862.
Natural gas distribution.
1863.
Unlawful employment practices; regulations.
1864.
Disclosure of financial interests by officers and employees of Department of the Interior.
1865.
Investigation of reserves of oil and gas in Outer Continental Shelf.
1866.
Relationship to existing law.
#### § 72.20 Prohibition against performing legal services or employing counsel.

A consular officer may not act as an attorney or agent for the estate of a deceased United States citizen or non-citizen national overseas or employ counsel at the expense of the United States Government in taking possession and disposing of the personal estate of a United States citizen or non-citizen national who dies abroad, unless specifically authorized in writing by the Department. If the legal representative or other interested person wishes to obtain legal counsel, the consular officer may furnish a list of attorneys.
#### § 95.4 Review and construction.

Decisions of the Secretary concerning surrender of fugitives for extradition are matters of executive discretion not subject to judicial review. Furthermore, pursuant to section 2242(d) of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998, P.L. 105-277, notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review these regulations, and nothing in section 2242 shall be construed as providing any court jurisdiction to consider or review claims raised under the Convention or section 2242, or any other determination made with respect to the application of the policy set forth in section 2242(a), except as part of the review of a final order of removal pursuant to section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252), which is not applicable to extradition proceedings.
§ 203.423 Distribution of distributive shares. ( a ) The Commissioner may provide for the distribution to the mortgagor of a share of the participating reserve account if the contract of insurance is terminated by: ( 1 ) Conveyance to one other than the Commissioner and a claim for the insurance benefits is not presented by the mortgage (§ 203.315), provided, however, in the case of a mortgage insured pursuant to an application for a conditional commitment received on or after May 19, 1988, (or, as appropriate, an application for mortgage insurance endorsement under the Single Family Direct Endorsement program, as provided in § 203.255, where the property appraisal report is signed by the mortgagee's underwriter on or after May 19, 1988, no distribution shall be made if the mortgagee forecloses the mortgage or accepts a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure;
( 2 ) Prepayment of the mortgage (§ 203.316); or
( 3 ) Voluntary agreement of the mortgagor and mortgagees (§ 203.317).
( b ) The Commissioner shall determine the amount of the distributive share by multiplying the amount of the premium or premiums paid by the applicable distributive share percentage for mortgages insured in the year the mortgage was endorsed for insurance. The Commissioner shall determine the applicable distributive share percentage in an equitable manner and in accordance with sound financial and actuarial practice, taking into account the cumulative actual financial and actuarial experiences through the end of the most recent calendar year.
[48 FR 28806, June 23, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 1329, Jan. 13, 1987; 53 FR 10530, Apr. 1, 1988; 61 FR 36453, July 10, 1996]
§ 309.4 Other procedures or actions. ( a ) Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to require Peace Corps to duplicate administrative proceedings required by contract or other laws or regulations.
( b ) Nothing in this regulation is intended to preclude utilization of informal administrative actions or remedies which may be available.
( c ) Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to deter Peace Corps from demanding the return of specific property or from demanding the return of the property or the payment of its value.
( d ) The failure of Peace Corps to comply with any provision in this regulation shall not serve as a defense to the debt.
#### § 906.4 Hearing panels and members.

Unless the Board and the parties agree otherwise, all hearings shall be held before a panel of at least three members.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2767 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2767

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on n ethyl N (3-sulfobenzyl) 
                                aniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on n ethyl N (3-sulfobenzyl) 
                                aniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. N ETHYL N (3-SULFOBENZYL) ANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.68 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to n ethyl N (3-sulfobenzyl) 
aniline) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER III—SALES OF ISOLATED TRACTS
### §6936. Expansion during interim status

#### (a) Waste piles

The owner or operator of a waste pile qualifying for the authorization to operate under section 6925(e) of this title shall be subject to the same requirements for liners and leachate collection systems or equivalent protection provided in regulations promulgated by the Administrator under section 6924 of this title before October 1, 1982, or revised under section 6924(o) of this title (relating to minimum technological requirements), for new facilities receiving individual permits under subsection (c) of section 6925 of this title, with respect to each new unit, replacement of an existing unit, or lateral expansion of an existing unit that is within the waste management area identified in the permit application submitted under section 6925 of this title, and with respect to waste received beginning six months after November 8, 1984.

#### (b) Landfills and surface impoundments

(1) The owner or operator of a landfill or surface impoundment qualifying for the authorization to operate under section 6925(e) of this title shall be subject to the requirements of section 6924(o) of this title (relating to minimum technological requirements), with respect to each new unit, replacement of an existing unit, or lateral expansion of an existing unit that is within the waste management area identified in the permit application submitted under this section, and with respect to waste received beginning 6 months after November 8, 1984.

(2) The owner or operator of each unit referred to in paragraph (1) shall notify the Administrator (or the State, if appropriate) at least sixty days prior to receiving waste. The Administrator (or the State) shall require the filing, within six months of receipt of such notice, of an application for a final determination regarding the issuance of a permit for each facility submitting such notice.

(3) In the case of any unit in which the liner and leachate collection system has been installed pursuant to the requirements of this section and in good faith compliance with the Administrator's regulations and guidance documents governing liners and leachate collection systems, no liner or leachate collection system which is different from that which was so installed pursuant to this section shall be required for such unit by the Administrator when issuing the first permit under section 6925 of this title to such facility, except that the Administrator shall not be precluded from requiring installation of a new liner when the Administrator has reason to believe that any liner installed pursuant to the requirements of this section is leaking. The Administrator may, under section 6924 of this title, amend the requirements for liners and leachate collection systems required under this section as may be necessary to provide additional protection for human health and the environment.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §3015, as added Pub. L. 98–616, title II, §243(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3260.)
§ 512.23 Liquidation from final check or recovery from other payment. ( a ) If an employee retires or resigns before collection of the debt is completed, offset of the entire remaining balance may be made from a final payment of any nature to such extent as is necessary to liquidate the debt.
( b ) Where debt cannot be liquidated by offset from final payment, offset may be made from later payments of any kind due from the United States inclusive of Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 8347 and 5 CFR 831.1801 *et seq* of this regulation.
[52 FR 43897, Nov. 17, 1987, as amended at 55 FR 3051, Jan. 30, 1990]
§ 221.753 Termination of mortgage insurance. In addition to the provisions of § 207.253a, the following requirements apply to certain multifamily mortgages insured under section 221 of the National Housing Act: ( a ) For those projects qualifying as eligible low income housing under § 248.201, the contract of insurance may be terminated only as provided in part 248.
( b ) For those projects subject to section 250(a) of the National Housing Act, the contract of insurance may be terminated only if the Commissioner determines that the requirements of section 250(a) are met.
[55 FR 38958, Sept. 21, 1990]
Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. *

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 08-1246

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

LARRY STALLINGS,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Lynch, Chief Judge,

Farris and Boudin, Circuit Judges. *

Stephen Feldman with whom Feldman & Feldman was on brief for

appellant.

Donald Feith, Assistant United States Attorney with whom

Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney, was on brief for

appellee.

April 23, 2009
-2-

FARRIS, Circuit Judge. Larry Stallings alleges that the

district court erred by admitting evidence of his prior wire

conviction because admitting the evidence violated both a New

Hampshire district court local rule and Federal Rules of Evidence

403 and 404(b). We review applications of Federal Rules of

Evidence 403 and 404(b) and district court local rules for abuse of

discretion. United States v. Ofray-Campos, 534 F.3d 1, 35 (1st

Cir. 2008); Crowe v. Bouduc, 334 F.3d 124, 134 (1st Cir. 2003);

Crowley v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 361 F.3d 22, 25 (1st Cir. 2003).

The court admitted Stallings’s prior conviction in the

interest of justice because it found 1) the government did not act

in bad faith; 2) the evidence was highly probative; and 3) there

was no unfair prejudice to Stallings as a result of the

untimeliness. District courts have “broad latitude in administering

local rules,” Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. Precision Valley Aviation,

26 F.3d 220, 224 (1 Cir. 1994), and they may choose to forgive a st

party’s violation of a local rule. See United States v. DiazVillafone, 874 F.2d 43, 47 (1st Cir. 1989). There was no abuse of

discretion.

Stallings is incorrect that the district court’s

admission of his prior wire fraud conviction violated Federal Rules

of Evidence 403 and 404(b). Evidence of his prior conviction was

offered to rebut Stallings’s claim that he was unaware that he was
-3-

engaged in fraud. His prior conviction thus tended to prove

intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake. Its admission did not

violate Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). “Only rarely—and in

extraordinarily compelling circumstances—will [this court] reverse

a district court’s on-the-spot judgment concerning the relative

weighing of probative value and unfair effect.” United States v.

Whitney, 524 F.3d 134, 141 (1st Cir. 2008). There was no abuse of

discretion.

AFFIRMED.
§ 2003.1 Scope of the part and applicability of other HUD regulations. ( a ) *General.* This part contains the regulations of the Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a). The regulations inform the public that the Inspector General has the responsibility for carrying out the requirements of the Privacy Act and for issuing internal OIG orders and directives in connection with the Privacy Act. These regulations apply to all records that are contained in systems of records maintained by the OIG and that are retrieved by an individual's name or personal identifier.
( b ) *Applicability of part 16.* In addition to these regulations, the provisions of 24 CFR part 16 apply to the OIG, except that appendix A to part 16 is not applicable. The provisions of this part shall govern in the event of any conflict with the provisions of part 16.
### SUBCHAPTER II—ALASKA
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2099

In re: MAURICE GLENN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Extraordinary Writ. (8:15-cv-03058-PX)

Submitted: January 21, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before KING, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Glenn, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Glenn petitions for an extraordinary writ; he seeks an investigation into 

alleged misconduct by judicial employees and review of Judicial Council orders denying 

Glenn’s complaints of judicial misconduct. 

Our authority to issue extraordinary writs under the All Writs Act “is only incidental 

to and in aid of [our] appellate jurisdiction, which Congress has given [Courts of Appeals] 

over district courts and administrative boards and agencies.” Gurley v. Superior Ct. of 

Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam) (citations omitted). 

The relief sought by Glenn is not available by way of extraordinary writ. Accordingly, we 

deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York

corporation, and DOES 1 through 20,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York

corporation,

Counterclaimant,

 v.

HALSEY MINOR, an individual, and

ROES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Counterdefendants. /

No. C 08-05445 WHA (Lead Case)

Consolidated with:

No. C 09-00471 WHA

ORDER REGARDING MOTION

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order regarding the trial subpoena served on Raymond

Thornson, the accountant of plaintiff Halsey Minor, has been received. An opposition must be

filed no later than NOON ON FRIDAY, MAY 7, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 85 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2853 

To extend the suspension of duty on sodium petroleum sulfonate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on sodium petroleum 

sulfonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.34.01 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 sodium petroleum sulfonate) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2853 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN'S AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A 

SUBSTITUTE TO H.R. 4297, A BILL TO PROVIDE FOR RECONCILIATION 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 201(b) OF THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE 

BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006, SCHEDULED FOR MARKUP IN THE 

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS ON NOVEMBER 15, 2005 

The Chairman's Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute makes the following 

modifications to H.R. 4297: 

1. Addition of short title 

The Chairman's Amendment adds a short title to the bill, the “Tax Relief Extension 

Reconciliation Act of 2005.” 

2. Deletion of provision relating to the deduction of State and local general sales taxes 

The Chairman’s Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to the deduction 

of State and local general sales taxes. 

3. Deletion of provision relating to the research credit 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to the research 

credit. 

4. Deletion of provision relating to the above-the-line deduction for higher education 

expenses 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to the above-theline deduction for higher education expenses. 

5. Deletion of provision relating to the above-the-line deduction for certain expenses of 

elementary and secondary school teachers 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to the above-theline deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers. 

Joint Committee on Taxation 

November 14, 2005 

JCX-76-05 
2 

6. Deletion of provision relating to Qualified Zone Academy Bonds 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to Qualified 

Zone Academy Bonds. 

7. Deletion of provision relating to authority for undercover operations 

The Chairman’s Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to authority for 

undercover operations. 

8. Modification of provision relating to the work opportunity tax credit and the welfare-towork tax credit 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 combining and extending 

the work opportunity tax credit and the welfare-to-work tax credit. The Chairman's Amendment 

extends the present-law welfare-to-work credit for one year. The Chairman's Amendment also 

extends the present-law work opportunity tax credit for one year and increases the age limit for 

food stamp recipients from 25 to 35. 

9. Deletion of provision relating to the credit for elective deferrals and IRA contributions 

(the "saver's credit") 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to the credit for 

elective deferrals and IRA contributions (the "saver's credit"). 

10. Deletion of provision relating to the extension of increased expensing for small business 

The Chairman's Amendment deletes the provision of H.R. 4297 relating to the extension 

of increased expensing for small business.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
David D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ David D. WesselinkDavid D. WesselinkNovember 9, 2004
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 146.47 Remedial and affirmative action by recipients. ( a ) Where the Secretary finds that a recipient has unlawfully discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take any action that the Secretary may require to overcome the effects of the discrimination. If another recipient exercises control over a subrecipient that has unlawfully discriminated, the Secretary may require both recipients to take remedial action.
( b ) Even in the absence of a finding of discrimination, a recipient may take affirmative action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipient's program or activity on the basis of age.
( c ) If a recipient operating a program which serves the elderly or children in addition to persons of other ages provides special benefits to the elderly or children, the provision of those benefits shall be presumed to be voluntary affirmative action, provided that it does not have the effect of excluding otherwise eligible persons from participation in the program.