alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77758-77759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 77759]]

amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets of commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel SBIR Topic 206: Methods of Innovative Pharmaceutical 
Manufacturing & Quality Assurance.
    Date: February 16, 2005.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone conference call).
    Contact Person: Kenneth L. Bielat, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 7147, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7576, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e18388848d80958aa18c80888dcf8f8889cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65070c000904110e2508040c094b0b0c0d4b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-28312 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

TREANDOUS COTTON, No. 3:09-CV-0385 WHA (NJV) 

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS 

CORPUS AD TESTIFICANUM

v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________________/

On December 30, 2014, the court issued a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for the

person of Treandous Cotton, inmate no. T97805, to attend a settlement conference at Solano State Prison

on February 11, 2015, at 9:00 am. (Doc. 111.) On January 23, 2015, the court entered an order resetting

that settlement conference for February 24, 2015, at the Federal Courthouse in San Francisco. (Doc.

112.) Accordingly, the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issued December 30, 2014, is

HEREBY VACATED. A new writ will issue for the attendance of Plaintiff at the newly scheduled

settlement conference in San Francisco.

DATED: January 23, 2015 _______________________________

Nandor J. Vadas

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00385-WHA Document 113 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

TREANDOUS COTTON, No. 3:09-CV-0385 WHA (NJV)

Plaintiff,

v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that on January 23, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy

of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below,

by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.

Litigation Coordinator

Salinas Valley State Prison

P.O. Box 1020

Soledad, CA 93960-1020

 ____________________________________

 Linn Van Meter

 Administrative Law Clerk to

 the Honorable Nandor J. Vadas

Case 3:09-cv-00385-WHA Document 113 Filed 01/23/15 Page 2 of 2
#### § 34.1 Purpose.

These regulations prescribe the procedures to be used by the United States Department of State (STATE) in the collection of debts owed to STATE and to the United States.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:31:38-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page1 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page2 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 3 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page3 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 4 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page4 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 5 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page5 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 6 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page6 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 7 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page7 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 8 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page8 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 9 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page9 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 10 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page10 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 11 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page11 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 12 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page12 of 13
Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 62 Filed 01/27/10 Page 13 of 13 Case3:08-cv-05565-SI Document60 Filed01/20/10 Page13 of 13
### §7920. Enforcement

#### (a) Civil penalty; appellate review; action to recover civil penalty; sovereign immunity; equitable remedies

(1) Any person who violates any provision of this subchapter or any cooperative agreement entered into pursuant to this subchapter or any rule prescribed under this chapter concerning any designated processing site, disposition site, or remedial action shall be subject to an assessment by the Secretary of a civil penalty of not more than $1,000 per day per violation. Such assessment shall be made by order after notice and an opportunity for a public hearing, pursuant to section 554 of title 5.

(2) Any person against whom a penalty is assessed under this section may, within sixty calendar days after the date of the order of the Secretary assessing such penalty, institute an action in the United States court of appeals for the appropriate judicial circuit for judicial review of such order in accordance with chapter 7 of title 5. The court shall have jurisdiction to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or setting aside in whole or in part, the order of the Secretary, or the court may remand the proceeding to the Secretary for such further action as the court may direct.

(3) If any person fails to pay an assessment of a civil penalty after it has become a final and unappealable order, the Secretary shall institute an action to recover the amount of such penalty in any appropriate district court of the United States. In such action, the validity and appropriateness of such final assessment order or judgment shall not be subject to review. Section 7172(d) of this title shall not apply with respect to the functions of the Secretary under this section.

(4) No civil penalty may be assessed against the United States or any State or political subdivision of a State or any official or employee of the foregoing.

(5) Nothing in this section shall prevent the Secretary from enforcing any provision of this subchapter or any cooperative agreement or any such rule by injunction or other equitable remedy.

#### (b) Atomic energy licensing requirements

Subsection (a) shall not apply to any licensing requirement under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.]. Such licensing requirements shall be enforced by the Commission as provided in such Act.

(Pub. L. 95–604, title I, §110, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3030.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–604, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3021, known as the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note under section 7901 of this title and Tables.

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§2011 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Francis E. Dec, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and Noonan, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Drab, Appellant, against Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Claimant appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board holding that his claim is barred by failure to give notice in compliance with section 28 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant alleges that he sustained an accident in the nature of a heart attack on February 8, 1954. A written claim was not filed until March 14, 1957, more than three years after the alleged occurrence. Claimant contends that the self-insured employer knew of the alleged accident, and that the failure to comply with section 28 was waived by an advance payment of compensation. Appellant testified that on February 8, 1954, while he was assisting and lifting a coemployee who had suffered a heart attack, he felt a pain in his chest and arms, and that he told one of the employer’s plant doctors about it the next day. The employer maintained a medical department from which its employees could receive treatment for physical ailment whether employment connected or not. Claimant had been visiting the medical department at regular intervals because of an ulcer condition. There is nothing in the documentary evidence or in the oral testimony, other than claimant’s testimony, which indicates that claimant at any time reported to his superior, to coemployees, or to the medical department, of having suffered any pain or of claiming any accident as a result of the February 8 incident. The cost of any medical attention furnished claimant was defrayed by Mutual Aid funds, a benefit not available to compensation cases. During the course of his illness claimant was paid wages from a sick pay plan maintained by the employer for any kind of disability of its employees. We find no evidence in the record, other than claimant’s testimony, that the employer knew that claimant had suffered, or claimed to have suffered, any accident or employment-connected injuries at any time until the written MaiTM *862was filed. The great weight of evidence is that no benefit, medical or payment of wages, was furnished by the employer with any knowledge that it had any relation to a compensable claim. Claimant’s credibility was exclusively a question for the board to determine. The board has found: “3. There is no indication that treatment rendered by the employer was with knowledge that it was for a compensable injury and the treatment rendered cannot be considered an advance payment to waive the bar of Section 28 of the Law.” At best a question of fact was presented, and there is substantial evidence to support such a finding and the decision of the board disallowing the claim. *(Matter of Lombardo*v. *Endioott Johnson Corp.,*275 App. Div. 18.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present —Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 09-0860 RS (PR)

ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

 

*E-Filed 5/27/10*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

MIGUEL VILLANUEVA,

Petitioner,

v.

ROBERT K. WONG, Warden, 

Respondent. /

No. C 09-0860 RS (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING FURTHER

BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating

to federal review of parole decisions in California. See Hayward v. Marshall, No. 06-55392, 

2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). The Court requests that the parties

submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 12 pages in length) explaining their views on how

the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole denial habeas case. The Court sets the

following schedule:

1. Within 10 days of this order, respondent shall send to petitioner a copy of the

Hayward decision. 

2. Within 30 days of this order, respondent shall file with the Court and serve on

petitioner a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

Case 3:09-cv-00860-RS Document 10 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 09-0860 RS (PR)

2 ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING

3. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file with the Court and serve on

respondent a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May ___, 2010 

 RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

27

Case 3:09-cv-00860-RS Document 10 Filed 05/27/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2856 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain inflatable balls. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain inflatable balls. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN INFLATABLE BALLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.95.07 Inflatable balls other than 

basketballs and volleyballs 

(provided for in subheading 

9506.62.80) ......................... Free Free No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2856 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §901a. Repealed. Aug. 28, 1950, ch. 809, title IV, §401(b), 64 Stat. 558

Section, act Aug. 10, 1939, ch. 666, title IX, §908, 53 Stat. 1402, placed Social Security Board under direction and supervision of Federal Security Administrator.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bernard G. Dvorak, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of On Command
Corporation (this Amendment); and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Amendment.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 24, 2003
    
    By:
    /s/ Bernard G. DvorakName:
    Bernard G. DvorakTitle:
    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer (Principal Accounting andFinancial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oscar Dillard, Appellant.

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties dated May 24,1960, appeal withdrawn as academic. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04360A197
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2774 

To suspend temporarily the duty on basic yellow 40 chloride based. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on basic yellow 40 chloride 

based. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASIC YELLOW 40 CHLORIDE BASED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 Basic yellow 40 chloride 

based (CAS No. 29556–33– 

0)provided for in subheading 

3204.13.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2774 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §5611. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5611 was editorially reclassified as section 11111 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Education and Outreach to Trafficking Survivors

Pub. L. 114–22, title I, §119, May 29, 2015, 129 Stat. 247, which required the Attorney General to make available, on the website of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, educational and outreach information for trafficking victim advocates, crisis hotline personnel, foster parents, law enforcement personnel, and crime survivors, was editorially reclassified as section 20710 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 64 FR 54539, Oct. 7, 1999.

§ 61.4 Certification procedures—Exports. ( a ) Applicants seeking certification of U.S. produced audio-visual materials shall submit to the Department a completed Application Form for each subject or series for which certification is sought. Collateral instructional material, if any, and a copy or example of the material must accompany the Application Form.
( b ) Upon an affirmative determination by the Department that the submitted materials satisfy the Certification and Authentication Criteria set forth in § 502.3 of this part, a Certificate shall be issued. A copy of such Certificate must accompany each export shipment of the certified material.
NO. 12-15-00066-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

GERALD GLENN TURNER,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 349TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is signed by Appellant 

and his counsel. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion 

to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Opinion delivered May 6, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 6, 2015

NO. 12-15-00066-CR

GERALD GLENN TURNER,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 349th District Court 

of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 349-7584)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 436 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 436

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2011

    Mr. Paulsen (for himself, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Lee of New York, Mr. 
Gerlach, Mr. Reichert, Mr. Lance, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Rogers of 
  Michigan, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Kline, Mr. Cravaack, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. 
 Akin, Mr. Bartlett, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. 
Campbell, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Cole, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Dent, Mrs. Ellmers, 
    Mr. Fleming, Mr. Flores, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. 
   Goodlatte, Mr. Guinta, Mr. Harris, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Lankford, Mr. 
Marchant, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Poe of Texas, 
    Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Walsh of 
  Illinois, and Mr. Young of Indiana) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                            medical devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Medical Innovation Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 4191 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is hereby repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (a) of section 4221 of such Code is amended 
        by striking the last sentence.
            (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6416(b) of such Code is 
        amended by striking the last sentence.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of subchapters for chapter 32 of 
such Code is amended by striking the item relating to subchapter E.
                                 <all>
```