alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 

NO. CV-09-00430 JSW

1 n:\cxlit\li2009\100014\00607465.doc

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

DANNY CHOU, State Bar #180240

Chief of Complex and Special Litigation 

CHRISTINE VAN AKEN, State Bar #241755

Deputy City Attorney 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 7th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3875 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3985 

E-Mail: christine.van.aken@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 

SERGEANT R. ANDREW COX, and 

OFFICER CARLA SPAIN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSEPH MCINERNEY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C 09-00430 JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ORDER 

ENLARGING TIME AND MODIFYING 

PRETRIAL AND TRIAL SCHEDULE 

Date Action Filed: January 21, 2009 

Trial Date: July 9, 2010 

On February 1, 2010, the defendants the City and County of San Francisco, Sergeant R. 

Andrew Cox, and Officer Carla Spain ("Defendants"), requested that this Court vacate the pretrial and 

trial schedule and modify the scheduling order in this case. 

The reason Defendants offer for this request is that their attorney will be away on leave from 

February 15, 2010 through May 8, 2010. 

For good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion, vacates all pretrial and 

trial dates in this case, and sets the following pretrial and trial schedule: 

Close of fact discovery: February 15, 2010 

Expert disclosures and reports due: May 25, 2010 

Case 3:09-cv-00430-JSW Document 31 Filed 02/12/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-00430-JSW Document30 Filed02/02/10 Page1 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING 

NO. CV-09-00430 JSW

2 n:\cxlit\li2009\100014\00607465.doc

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Rebuttal Expert disclosures and reports due: June 8, 2010 

Close of Expert discovery: June 22, 2010 

Case management statement due: June 4, 2010 

Further Case Management Conference: June 11, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. 

Last day for hearing on dispositive motions: July 9, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. 

Pretrial Conference: September 20, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. 

Jury Trial: October 12, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. (3 day est.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated:___________________ ____________________________ 

 HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

 United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cv-00430-JSW Document30 Filed02/02/10 Page2 of 3

2

Case 3:09-cv-00430-JSW Document 31 Filed 02/12/10 Page 2 of 2
### §§2961 to 2970. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §683(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 519

Section 2961, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §611, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 532; Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §607, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1470; Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §108(i), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 716; Pub. L. 95–568, §17(a)(31), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2442, related to benefit limitations for those voluntarily poor.

Section 2962, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §612, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 533; Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §108(j), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 716, related to joint funding.

Section 2963, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §613, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 533; Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §608, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1471; Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §108(k), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 717, related to unlawful activities.

Section 2964, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §614, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 533, prohibited Federal control over curriculum, personnel, etc.

Section 2965, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §615, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 533; Pub. L. 89–253, §30(e), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 979; Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §609, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1471; Pub. L. 91–177, title I, §101(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 827; Pub. L. 92–424, §2(a), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 688; Pub. L. 93–644, §14(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2329; Pub. L. 95–568, §13(g), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2436, related to duration of program.

Section 2966, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §616, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 533; Pub. L. 89–253, §29, Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 978; Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §610, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1471; Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §108(l), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 717; Pub. L. 91–177, title I, §110, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 831; Pub. L. 92–424, §4, Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 690, related to transfer of funds.

Section 2967, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §617, as added Pub. L. 89–253, §30(f), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 979, related to benefit distribution between urban and rural areas.

Section 2968, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §618, as added Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §611, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1471, related to restrictions on additional positions.

Section 2969, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §619, as added Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §612, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1472, set forth limitations on Federal administrative expenses.

Section 2970, Pub. L. 88–452, title VI, §620, as added Pub. L. 89–794, title VI, §614(a), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1472; amended Pub. L. 95–568, §13(h), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2436, related to maximum use of private enterprise resources.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9912(a) of this title, prior to the general amendment of chapter 106 (§9901 et seq.) of this title by Pub. L. 105–285.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 11466

Ex. Ord. No. 11466, eff. Apr. 18, 1969, 34 F.R. 6727, formerly set out as a note under section 2962 of this title, which related to the administration of certain jointly funded projects, was superseded by Ex. Ord. No. 11867, eff. June 19, 1975, 40 F.R. 26253, formerly set out as a note under section 7103 of Title 31, Money and Finance.
§ 100.115 Residential real estate-related transactions. The term residential *real estate-related transactions* means: ( a ) The making or purchasing of loans or providing other financial assistance— ( 1 ) For purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing or maintaining a dwelling; or
( 2 ) Secured by residential real estate; or
( b ) The selling, brokering or appraising of residential real property.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE ESTATE OF JERRY A. AMARO III,

GERALDINE MONTOYA, and

STEPHANIE MONTOYA,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY OF OAKLAND, RICHARD WORD,

EDWARD POULSON, R. HOLMGREN, S.

NOWAK, M. BATTLE, E. KARSSEBOOM,

C. BUNN, M. PATTERSON, individually

and in their capacities as members of the City

of Oakland Police Department, and DOES

1–100, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01019 WHA

ORDER VACATING TRIAL

DATES PENDING DEFENDANTS’

PETITION FOR APPEAL

Pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision on defendants’ petition for an immediate appeal, the

pre-trial conference (scheduled for April 5) and trial date (scheduled for April 19) are VACATED. 

The parties shall promptly notify the Court of any decision reached by the Ninth Circuit on this

matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01019-WHA Document 106 Filed 03/23/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1508.830 Under what conditions do I get an additional opportunity to challenge the facts on which a proposed debarment is based? ( a ) You as a respondent will not have an additional opportunity to challenge the facts if the debarring official determines that— ( 1 ) Your debarment is based upon a conviction or civil judgment;
( 2 ) Your presentation in opposition contains only general denials to information contained in the Notice of Proposed Debarment; or
( 3 ) The issues raised in your presentation in opposition to the proposed debarment are not factual in nature, or are not material to the debarring official's decision whether to debar.
( b ) You will have an additional opportunity to challenge the facts if the debarring official determines that— ( 1 ) The conditions in paragraph (a) of this section do not exist; and
( 2 ) Your presentation in opposition raises a genuine dispute over facts material to the proposed debarment.
( c ) If you have an opportunity to challenge disputed material facts under this section, the debarring official or designee must conduct additional proceedings to resolve those facts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.17 Mortgage coverage.

The mortgage shall cover the entire property included in the project.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 29, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01426-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF I.C.D.N., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. A-16-00113-X 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

In her notice of appeal, appellant states she is appealing the trial court’s November 21, 

2017 order denying her plea to the jurisdiction. By letter dated December 28, 2017, the Court 

questioned its jurisdiction of this appeal because the interlocutory order does not appear to be 

appealable. We instructed appellant to file, by January 9, 2018, a letter brief addressing our 

concern and cautioned that failure to do so may result in dismissal of the appeal without further 

notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not filed a response. 

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments and certain 

interlocutory orders as permitted by statute. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 

195 (Tex. 2001). A person may appeal from an interlocutory order that grants or denies a plea to 

the jurisdiction by a governmental unit. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(8) 

(West Supp. 2017). Appellant, an individual and not a governmental unit, filed the plea to the 

jurisdiction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 101.001(3) (West Supp. 2017). Because a 
 –2– 

governmental unit did not file the plea to the jurisdiction, the trial court’s order denying the plea 

is not subject to interlocutory appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(8). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

171426F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF I.C.D.N., A CHILD

No. 05-17-01426-CV 

 On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. A-16-00113-X. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellees Danghai Ho and Tung Ho recover their costs of this 

appeal from appellant Cheyenne Nguyen. 

Judgment entered January 29, 2018.
### §7671p. International cooperation

#### (a) In general

The President shall undertake to enter into international agreements to foster cooperative research which complements studies and research authorized by this subchapter, and to develop standards and regulations which protect the stratosphere consistent with regulations applicable within the United States. For these purposes the President through the Secretary of State and the Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, shall negotiate multilateral treaties, conventions, resolutions, or other agreements, and formulate, present, or support proposals at the United Nations and other appropriate international forums and shall report to the Congress periodically on efforts to arrive at such agreements.

#### (b) Assistance to developing countries

The Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall support global participation in the Montreal Protocol by providing technical and financial assistance to developing countries that are Parties to the Montreal Protocol and operating under article 5 of the Protocol. There are authorized to be appropriated not more than $30,000,000 to carry out this section in fiscal years 1991, 1992 and 1993 and such sums as may be necessary in fiscal years 1994 and 1995. If China and India become Parties to the Montreal Protocol, there are authorized to be appropriated not more than an additional $30,000,000 to carry out this section in fiscal years 1991, 1992, and 1993.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title VI, §617, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title VI, §602(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2669.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authority of Secretary of State

Except as otherwise provided, Secretary of State to have and exercise any authority vested by law in any official or office of Department of State and references to such officials or offices deemed to refer to Secretary of State or Department of State, as appropriate, see section 2651a of Title 22, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, and section 161(d) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2651a of Title 22.
#### § 207.260 Maintenance and inspection of property.

As long as the mortgage is insured or held by the Commissioner, the mortgagor must maintain the insured project in accordance with the physical condition requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G; and the mortgagee must inspect the project in accordance with the physical inspection requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G.

[63 FR 46578, Sept. 1, 1998]
Order issued November 7, 2012

In The

nitrt of Aipirnb

ifth iiitrirt of Jtxa at Iatta

No. 05-10-00737-CR

JOHN AUBREY HASSELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Murphy

Appellant’s July 6, 2012 motion for rehearing is DENIED.

(J_ L /••••

DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT - 11.1

EDGE PETROLEUM CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
                                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                           MARCH 31,
                                                                ------------------------------
                                                                    1998               1997
<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>
Basic common and common equivalent shares outstanding,
 beginning of period                                             7,510,283           4,701,361

Weighted average shares and equivalent shares outstanding: 
   Issued in connection with the public offering                                     1,073,333
   Restricted stock                                                250,586              97,450
                                                                ----------          ----------
Basic weighted average common and common equivalent shares 
 outstanding, end of period                                      7,760,869           5,872,144
                                                                ----------          ----------
Dilutive common stock options                                       33,229              17,445
                                                                ----------          ----------
Diluted weighted average common and common equivalent 
 shares outstanding                                              7,794,098           5,889,589
                                                                ----------          ----------
                                                                ----------          ----------
Net Income                                                      $  358,466          $  931,351
                                                                ----------          ----------
                                                                ----------          ----------
Basic Earnings Per Share                                        $     0.05          $     0.16
                                                                ----------          ----------
                                                                ----------          ----------
Diluted Earnings Per Share                                      $     0.05          $     0.16
                                                                ----------          ----------
                                                                ----------          ----------
</TABLE>




                                      15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       17,668,913
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      34,060,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                  538,415
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 100,555
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,907,783
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      766,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            766,968
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    37,643,538
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        3,810,535
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        3,810,535
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    (544,610)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        807,578
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    13,334,309
<NET-ASSETS>                                51,140,815
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              941,550
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,486,160
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      (544,610)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       807,578
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                      936,319
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        1,199,287
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       1,199,287
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,053,870
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,486,160
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        50,541,172
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            13.11
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  (.14)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                            .45
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              13.42
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                    .04


</TABLE>
Case 3:08-cv-02036-CRB Document 12 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-02036-CRB Document 12 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 512.24 Non-waiver of rights by payments.

An employee's voluntary payment of all or part of a debt being collected under 5 U.S.C. 5514 shall not be construed as a waiver of any rights which the employee may have under 5 U.S.C., or any other provision of contract or law, unless statutory or contractual provisions provide to the contrary.
Served: April 7, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 7th of April, 2010

Essential Air Service at

ADAK, ALASKA

ATKA, ALASKA

NIKOLSKI, ALASKA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq. 

DOCKET OST-2000-8556

DOCKET OST-1995-363

DOCKET OST-1995-363

NOTICE

By Order 2010-2-8, February 3, 2010, we requested proposals for EAS at Adak, Atka, and 

Nikolski, Alaska. We received timely-filed proposals from Peninsula Airways, Inc., and 

Alaska Airlines, Inc., and requested comments from the state and communities by April 14. 

On April 6 the state of Alaska requested an extension to May 5, 2010, to submit comments. 

We have decided to grant the state’s request. All comments are now due no later than 

May 5, 2010. 

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at

http://www.regulations.gov
### SERVED: AUGUST 20, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC INTHE MATTER OF

. ·'i LEADINGEDGE AVIATION, INC. FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0783 NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING "' 'i

### l /: f, ") r....,.. ••,,;**~**

Thisproceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2011NM070089) has been assigned to AdministrativeLawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, theFAAHearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached ServiceList. Attachment - ServiceListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 •"j Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 Fred C. Begy, Respondent's Counsel Chuhak &Tecson, Attorneys at Law 30 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2600 Chicago, IL 60606 TEL: 312-855.-5442 FAJ(: 312-444-9027 ONE COPY Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAJ(: 425-227-1007

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 " U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant F AJ(: 202-366-7536

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0783 (Civil Penalty Action) ., 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-