alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
>

USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Woods Hole Science Center

##### U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1138

| Sea-Floor Character and Sedimentary Processes of Great Round Shoal Channel, Offshore Massachusetts
**by Lawrence J. Poppe¹, Seth D. Ackerman², David S. Foster¹, Dann S. Blackwood¹, S. Jeffress Williams¹, M.S. Moser³, H.F. Stewart³, and K. A. Glomb³**

**Published 2007** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Title Page**   IntroductionSettingMethodsOverview DiscussionInterpretation Data CatalogAcknowledgmentsReferencesList of FiguresBottom PhotographsSediment DataContactsDisclaimers                                                                                                                                    |  |

¹ Coastal and Marine Geology Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543² Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management, Woods Hole Science Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543³ Atlantic Hydrographic Branch, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Norfolk, Virginia 23510

----

Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Skip Navigation
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |		U.S. Geological Survey |		Coastal and Marine Geology		URL: cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/publications/of2007-1138/index.html		Page Contact Information: CMGDS Team		Page Last Modified: Wednesday, 06-Dec-2017 13:13:14 EST
P.1 

OAR Box 1818 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

22) ll-C-19 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/6/2008 3:12:44 PM Sheet 22 of 79 
P.2 

J UL I i J'i" 

Honorable Edward P. Boland, Chairman 

House Appropriations 

Subcommittee on HUD-Independent Agencies 

2426 Rayburn Office Building 

Washington, D.C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Boland: 

In the Conference Committee Report for the 1967 fiscal year 

budget, the conferees requested that the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) provide Congress with certain 

background information regarding the regulation of refueling 

emissions .from motor vehicles, as detailed in the House 

Appropriations Committee Report. The House Appropriations 

Committee expressed concern that the Agency may not have 

developed sufficient data with which to properly assess the 

desirability of a nationwide refueling control program. As a 

consequence, EPA was directed to: 1) review the need for and 

effectiveness of a nationwide refueling control program, 2) 

evaluate the costs and benefits of alternatives to assure a 

cost-effective strategy, 3) assure that requirements of the 

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 301 or potential defect 

problems related to onboard controls are adequately resolved, 

and 4) address the effects of fuel volatility on refueling 

controls. In addition, the House Appropriations Committee 

asked that information regarding the above issues and all of 

the rulemaking support materials be provided to Congress 

concurrently with EPA's submission of the proposal for Federal 

Register publication. 

I am pleased to provide our proposal to control refueling 

emissions and the regulatory support materials to Congress, as 

requested (see enclosures) . I would like to assure the members 

of Congress that the proposed action is the culmination of an 

intensive analysis to identify the most appropriate form for 
P.3 

<f *"• 

controlling refueling emissions, and that all the concerns 

•expressed by the Appropriations Committee have been carefully 

considered. As always, we will be carefully considering all 

comments received in the upcoming public comment period and 

public hearing before proceeding with further regulatory action 

in this area. 

Sincerely, 

(Original signed by L.M. Thomas) 

Lee M. Thomas 

Enclosures
§ 215.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Act* means the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a; 88 Stat. 1896);
( b ) *Agency* means the International Development Cooperation Agency or the Agency for International Development, its offices, bureaus, divisions, and posts abroad;
( c ) *Amend* shall include the amendment of a record;
( d ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( e ) *Maintain* includes maintain, collect, use or disseminate;
( f ) *Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an agency, including, but not limited to, his education, financial transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and that contains his name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or voice print or a photograph;
( g ) *Routine use* means, with respect to the disclosure of a record, the use of such record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;
( h ) *Statistical record* means a record in a system of records maintained for statistical research or reporting purposes only and not used in whole or in part in making any determination about an identifiable individual, except as provided by section 8 of title 13;
( i ) *System of records* means a group of any records under the control of any agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual.
#### § 203.457 Voluntary termination of contract.

Upon request by the borrower and lender the Commissioner may terminate the insurance contract on the loan. The lender shall cancel the insurance endorsement on the insurance certificate or note upon receipt of notice from the Commissioner that the contract of insurance is terminated.

[37 FR 8662, Apr. 29, 1972]
### §5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 167, §4, 38 Stat. 1191, provided for appointment to higher grade of officers of Public Health Service detailed with the former Isthmian Canal Commission.
ALD-392 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 16-3399

___________

IN RE: CHRISTIAN DIOR WOMACK,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to E.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2:13-cr-00206-001)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

August 25, 2016

Before: AMBRO, SHWARTZ and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: August 29, 2016)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Christian Dior Womack, a.k.a. Gucci Prada, pleaded guilty to charges of sex 

trafficking of a minor and sex trafficking by force. We affirmed his judgment of 

sentence. United States v. Womack, C.A. No. 14-4787, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 6334, at 

*1 (3d Cir. Pa. Apr. 7, 2016). Presenting a variation of an argument that we have rejected 

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

before, he again asks us to issue a writ of mandamus to vacate his judgment of conviction 

and sentence. Womack claims that his appointed counsel improperly sought and 

accepted private funds as a retainer from Womack and that the District Court improperly 

ratified counsel’s action when it terminated counsel’s appointment and allowed Womack 

to privately retain counsel. 

We will deny the petition. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. See Kerr v. 

U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). A petitioner must ordinarily have no other 

means to obtain the desired relief, and he must show a clear and indisputable right to 

issuance of the writ. In re School Asbestos Litig., 977 F.2d 764, 772 (3d Cir. 1992). As 

we have explained to Womack previously, he cannot challenge the criminal judgment 

against him through a petition for a writ of mandamus because mandamus is not a 

substitute for appeal. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004);

Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40339 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUIS GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:93-CR-96-1

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luis Gonzalez, federal prisoner # 04434-078, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for modification of his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Gonzalez was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Gonzalez argues that Amendment 528 merely clarifies the career offender guideline and, therefore, he need not establish the retroactivity requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).No. 03-40339 -2- The language of the statute provides that a district court may not modify a term of imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) unless the term has been subsequently lowered by an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2);

see United States v. Gonzalez-Balderas , 105 F.3d 981, 982 (5th Cir. 1997). An amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines may not be applied retroactively upon a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) unless it is specifically set forth in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c). U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a), p.s. (Nov. 2001). Because Amendment 528 is not listed in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c), it may not be applied retroactively on Gonzalez’s motion. See United States v. Drath , 89 F.3d 216, 218 (5th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Gonzalez’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion.
AFFIRMED.
Order entered March 1, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01290 - CV FORGET ABOUT IT, INC ., ET AL. , Appellant s

V. BIOTE MEDICAL, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 01784 - B



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s February 27, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 2 5, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 707
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 707 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

§ 707.27 Fees. ( a ) The fees to be charged for making copies of any records provided to an individual under this part are ten (10) cents per page. No fees will be charged for search or review.
( b ) At its discretion, DFC may grant a request for special services such as mailing copies by means other than first class mail or providing document certification. All special services provided to the requester will be provided at cost.
( c ) DFC considers any request under the Privacy Act to be an authorization to incur up to $25.00 in fees unless a request states otherwise.
( d ) DFC may condition access to records or copies of records upon full payment of any fees due.
( e ) All payments under this part must be in the form of a check or bank draft denominated in U.S. currency. Checks should be made payable to the order of the United States Treasury and mailed or hand delivered to DFC at 1100 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20527.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DAMIAN G. BEY, a/k/a Damien Giovanni Bey, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:03-cr-00252-BR-l) 

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Damian G. Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Jude Darrow, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Damian G. Bey seeks to appeal the denial of his 

motions to compel the Government to file a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 

motion and to withdraw his guilty plea. In criminal cases, the 

defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after 

the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or 

without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good 

cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty 

days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); 

United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). 

The district court entered judgment on March 24, 2008 

and reaffirmed its previous denial on July 14, 2008. The notice 

of appeal was filed on October 22, 2008.* Because Bey failed to 

file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the 

appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

 *

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 

276 (1988).
§ 2004.10 Service of an Office of Inspector General subpoena. Service of a subpoena issued by OIG may be accomplished as follows: ( a ) *Personal service.* Service may be made by delivering the subpoena to the person to whom it is addressed. If the subpoena is addressed to a corporation or other business entity, it may be served upon an employee of the corporation or entity. Service made to an employee, agent, or legal representative of the addressee shall constitute service upon the addressee.
( b ) *Service by mail.* Service may also be made by mailing the subpoena, certified mail—return receipt requested, to the addressee at his or her last known business or personal address.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4423 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4423

    To suspend temporarily the duty on cyan 854 inkjet printing ink.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

  Mr. Carney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on cyan 854 inkjet printing ink.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYAN 854 INKJET PRINTING INK.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.41 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Cyan 854 inkjet printing 
ink) is amended by--
            (1) striking ``0.3%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 appear at 71 FR 34521 and 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 41.56 Athletes, artists and entertainers. ( a ) *Requirements for P classification.* An alien shall be classifiable under the provisions of INA 101(a)(15)(P) if: ( 1 ) The consular officer is satisfied that the alien qualifies under the provisions of that section; and either
( 2 ) With respect to the principal alien, the consular officer has received official evidence of the approval by DHS of a petition to accord such classification or of the extension by DHS of the period of authorized stay in such classification; or
( 3 ) The consular officer is satisfied the alien is the spouse or child of an alien so classified and is accompanying or following to join the principal alien.
( b ) *Approval of visa.* The approval of a petition by DHS does not establish that the alien is eligible to receive a nonimmigrant visa.
( c ) *Validity of visa.* The period of validity of a visa issued on the basis of paragraph (a) to this section must not exceed the period indicated in the petition, confirmation, or extension of stay required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( d ) *Alien not entitled to P classification.* The consular officer must suspend action on the alien's application and submit a report to the approving DHS office if the consular officer knows or has reason to believe that an alien applying for a visa under INA 101(a)(15)(P) is not entitled to the classification as approved.
[57 FR 31450, July 16, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 1833, Jan. 24, 1996]
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETYCOMPANY OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

    v.

DEVELICA LLC et al,

Defendant(s).                                                                      /

No. C 09-0878 MHP

MODIFIED CONDITIONAL DISMISSALORDER

Pursuant to notice of counsel by letter, filed May 18, 2010, the conditional dismissal order is

modified as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice; provided,

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on

opposing counsel, not later than March 1, 2011, that the agreed consideration for the settlement

has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the

calendar to be set for trial.

Dated: May 25, 2010MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00878-MHP   Document 27   Filed 05/26/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T14:20:29-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic Change Worksheet QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F4 

### Date: December 17,2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-Wll"lO - 

# 1/5

# S With whom outside the FAAhas this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date 

### ATA ,foe Whil~ May, ZOIO Hoeing Todd £ssdJ;IYll Jan. Feb & Aug, 2009 Boeing Everett Groat Feb & Man'h, 2009 Boeing Mike Sil"gr-!man M:lf(~h.2009

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNLOADED Chec!l. the Master List to Verify That This isthe Corred Revision Before Use
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

#### § 17.109 Nonwaiver of rights.

So long as there are no statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary, no employee involuntary payment (of all or a portion of a debt) collected under these regulations will be interpreted as a waiver of any rights that the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514 or any other provision of contract or law.
#### § 203.488 Sale of interests in insured loans.

No lender may sell or otherwise dispose of any insured loan or group of insured loans, or any partial interest in such loan or loans by means of any agreement, arrangement or device except pursuant to this subpart.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Patrick K. Donnelly, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PRA International;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;          (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide for reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;          (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Signature:/s/ Patrick K. Donnelly