alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 206.131 Contract rights and obligations for mortgages on individual dwelling units in a condominium. ( a ) *Additional requirements.* The requirements of this subpart shall be applicable to mortgages on individual dwelling units in a condominium, except as modified by this section.
( b ) *References.* The term *property* as used in this subpart shall be construed to include the individual dwelling unit and the undivided interest in the common areas and facilities as may be designated.
( c ) *Assignment of the mortgage.* If the mortgagee assigns the mortgage on the individual dwelling unit to the Commissioner, the mortgagee shall certify: ( 1 ) To any changes in the plan of apartment ownership including the administration of the property;
( 2 ) That as of the date the assignment is filed for record, the family unit is assessed and subject to assessment for taxes pertaining only to that unit; and
( 3 ) To the condition of the property as of the date the assignment is filed for record. For units in projects with mortgages insured under 24 CFR part 234, § 234.275 of this chapter concerning the certification of condition applies.
( d ) *Condition of the multifamily structure.* In projects with mortgages insured under 24 CFR part 234, the provisions of § 234.270(a) and (b) of this chapter concerning the condition of the multifamily structure in which the property is located shall be applicable to mortgages insured under this part which are assigned to the Commissioner.
[82 FR 7117, Jan. 19, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 41877, Aug. 15, 2019]
HISTORIC RESOURCE IMPACTS

ig Ai ie

CIRCA 1930

CIRCA 1900

National Park Service

stnvice

-



VIEW FROM GW MEMORIAL PARKWAY

EXISTING ALTERNATIVE A

ALTERNATIVE B

National Park Service

Warionat
ARK
stavice

-



VIEW FROM KEY BRIDGE

EXISTING ALTERNATIVE A

ALTERNATIVE B

National Park Service

Warionat
ARK
stavice

-
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

1021 NORTH GRAND AVENUE EAST, P.O. Box 19276, SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794·9276 • (217) 782-2829 

PAT QUINN, GOVERNOR LISA BONNETT, DIRECTOR 

217/785-4140 

January 9, 2015 

Mr. George T. Czerniak, Division Director 

Air and Radiation Division (A-18J) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region V 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Dear Mr. Czerniak, 

This letter is clarifying our December 31, 2012, Infrastructure SIP submission for the 2008 ozone 

and 2010 NOz and S02 NAAQS. The authority for the Illinois EPA and Illinois Pollution 

Control Board to develop rules and regulations found in 415 ILCS 5/4 also allows Illinois EPA 

to implement current rules and apply existing controls and emissions limits to help maintain new 

standards. Existing controls and emission limits that can be applied to the 2008 ozone NAAQS 

are found in 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts 205, 215, 218, 219, and 223, which control VOC as an 

ozone precursor, as well as Parts 217 and 225, which control NOx as an ozone precursor. The 

controls and emission limits for NOx also help protect the 2010 N02 NAAQS. 35 Ill. Adm. 

Code Parts 214 and 225 contain the controls and emissions limits that can be applied to the 2010 

S02 NAAQS. Our authority under the Illinois Enviromnental Protection Act to create new rules 

and implement existing emission limits and controls allow us to meet the requirements on 

110(a)(2)(A). 

Please feel free to contact David Bloomberg at 217/524-4949 if you have questions or need 

additional information pertaining to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Ju e K. Armi~%~ ureau of Air 

4302 N. Main St., Rockford, !l 61103 (815) 987~7760 

595 S.State, Elgin, IL 60123 (847) 608-3131 

2125 S. First St., Champaign, IL 61820 (217) 278-5800 

2009 Mall St., Collinsville, ll 62234 (618) 346-5120 

9511 Harrison St., Des Plaines, IL 60016 (847) 294-4000 

412 SW Washington St., Suite 0, Peoria, ll 61602 (309) 671-3022 

2309 W. Main St., Suite 116, Marlon, ll62959 (618) 993-7200 

1 00 W. Randolph, Suite 10-300, Chicago, ll 60601 (312) 81..:1-6026 

PLEASE PRINT ON RECYCLED PAPER
§ 115.207 Consequences of interim certification and certification. ( a ) Whenever a complaint received by the Assistant Secretary alleges violations of a fair housing law administered by an agency that has been interim certified or certified as substantially equivalent, the complaint will be referred to the agency, and no further action shall be taken by the Assistant Secretary with respect to such complaint except as provided for by the Act, this part, 24 CFR part 103, subpart C, and any written agreements executed by the Agency and the Assistant Secretary. HUD shall make referrals to interim certified and certified local agencies in accordance with this section even when the local agency is located in a state with an interim certified or certified state agency.
( b ) If HUD determines that a complaint has not been processed in a timely manner in accordance with the performance standards set forth in § 115.206, HUD may reactivate the complaint, conduct its own investigation and conciliation efforts, and make a determination consistent with 24 CFR part 103.
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, whenever the Assistant Secretary has reason to believe that a complaint demonstrates a basis for the commencement of proceedings against any respondent under section 814(a) of the Act or for proceedings by any governmental licensing or supervisory authorities, the Assistant Secretary shall transmit the information upon which such belief is based to the Attorney General, federal financial regulatory agencies, other federal agencies, or other appropriate governmental licensing or supervisory authorities.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001020998
<NAME> ACI TELECENTRICS INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         434,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,897,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                   182,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,245,292
<PP&E>                                       5,227,246
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,982,025
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,569,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,025,865
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,611,276
<OTHER-SE>                                    (707,713)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,569,849
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,858,902
<CGS>                                        4,493,433
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,745,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (7,850)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (879,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (335,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (544,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (544,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50466

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Esmeralda Diaz, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-1395-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit 

Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Esmeralda Diaz

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50466 Document: 00517063508 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2024
No. 23-50466

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50466 Document: 00517063508 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2024