alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Alicia Harris,

Plaintiff,

v.

Vector Marketing Corporation,

Defendant.

________________________________/

Case No. CV08-05198 EMC

AMENDED ORDER RESETTING JURY

TRIAL FROM 5/23/11 to 6/6/2011

Due to the court's calendar conflict, is it hereby ordered that the 15-day jury trial is reset

from 5/23/2011 to 6/6/2011 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom D, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate, San

Francisco, CA 94102. All other dates will be set at the 3/17/2010 Status Conference. An updated

joint status conference statement shall be filed by 3/10/2010. Parties shall meet and confer and

include in the joint updated status conference statement an agreeable time line for the FLSA class

certification motion.

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 10, 2010 

_______________________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 113 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 903.1 Initiation of cases. ( a ) Grievances submitted to the Board shall be in writing, and shall explain the nature of the grievance, and the remedy sought; shall contain all the documentation furnished to the Agency and the Agency's final review; and shall be timely filed in accordance with applicable regulations.
( b ) A member whose grievance is not resolved satisfactorily under Agency procedures, the representative of the grievant, or the exclusive representative (on behalf of a grievant who is a member of the bargaining unit), shall be entitled to file a grievance with the Board no later than 60 days after receiving the Agency decision. In the event that an Agency has not provided its decision within 90 days of filing with the Agency, the grievant, the representative of the grievant, or the exclusive representative (on the grievant's behalf) shall be entitled to file a grievance with the Board no later than 150 days after the date of filing with the Agency. The Board may extend or waive for good cause shown the time limits stated in this section, and may permit or request the views of the parties with respect to whether good cause has been shown for such an extension.
( c ) Separation for cause proceedings against a charged employee shall be initiated before the Board by submission of a statement of the acts or behavior considered by the Agency to warrant separation.
§ 203.466 Definition of delinquency and requirement for notice of delinquency to HUD. ( a ) A mortgage account is delinquent any time a payment is due and not paid.
( b ) Once each month on a day prescribed by HUD, the mortgagee shall report to HUD all mortgages insured under this part that were delinquent on the last day of the month, or that were reported as delinquent the previous month. The report shall be made in a manner prescribed by HUD.
[71 FR 16234, Mar. 31, 2006]
#### § 213.280 Finality of determination.

The determination of the Commissioner as to the amount to be paid to any mortgagor from the Cooperative Management Housing Insurance Fund shall be final and conclusive.
§ 203.670 Conveyance of occupied property. ( a ) It is HUD's policy to reduce the inventory of acquired properties in a manner that expands homeownership opportunities, strengthens neighborhoods and communities, and ensures a maximum return to the mortgage insurance fund.
( b ) The Secretary will accept conveyance of an occupied property containing one to four residential units if the Secretary finds that: ( 1 ) An individual residing in the property suffers from a temporary, permanent, or long-term illness or injury that would be aggravated by the process of moving from the property, and that the individual meets the eligibility criteria in § 203.674(a);
( 2 ) State or local law prohibits the mortgagee from evicting a tenant residing in the property who is making regular monthly payments to the mortgagor, or prohibits eviction for other similar reasons beyond the control of the mortgagee; or
( 3 ) It is in the Secretary's interest to accept conveyance of the property occupied under § 203.671, the property is habitable as defined in § 203.673, and, except for conveyances under § 203.671(d), each occupant who intends to remain in the property after the conveyance meets the eligibility criteria in § 203.674(b).
( c ) HUD consents to accept good marketable title to occupied property where 90 days have elapsed since the mortgagee notified HUD of pending acquisition, the Department has notified the mortgagee that it was considering a request for continued occupancy, and no subsequent notification from HUD has been received by the mortgagee.
[53 FR 874, Jan. 14, 1988, as amended at 56 FR 46967, Sept. 16, 1991; 58 FR 54246, Oct. 20, 1993; 61 FR 36266, July 9, 1996]
### §7384f. Legislative proposal

#### (a) Legislative proposal required

Not later than March 15, 2001, the President shall submit to Congress a proposal for legislation to implement the compensation program. The proposal for legislation shall include, at a minimum, the specific recommendations (including draft legislation) of the President for the following:

(1) The types of compensation and benefits, including lost wages, medical benefits, and any lump-sum settlement payments, to be provided under the compensation program.

(2) Any adjustments or modifications necessary to appropriately administer the compensation program under part B.

(3) Whether to expand the compensation program to include other illnesses associated with exposure to toxic substances.

(4) Whether to expand the class of individuals who are members of the Special Exposure Cohort (as defined in section 7384l(14) of this title).

#### (b) Assessment of potential covered employees and required amounts

The President shall include with the proposal for legislation under subsection (a) the following:

(1) An estimate of the number of covered employees that the President determines were exposed in the performance of duty.

(2) An estimate, for each fiscal year of the compensation program, of the amounts to be required for compensation and benefits anticipated to be provided in such fiscal year under the compensation program.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3613], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–498.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2930 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2930

 To prohibit the issuance of any Federal or State permit or lease for 
 new oil and gas slant, directional, or offshore drilling in or under 
                    one or more of the Great Lakes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2005

 Mr. Stupak (for himself, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Emanuel, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
 Brown of Ohio, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Kirk, Mr. LaTourette, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
 Dingell, Mr. Levin, Mr. Kucinich, Ms. Bean, Mr. Higgins, Ms. Kaptur, 
and Ms. Slaughter) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                       the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the issuance of any Federal or State permit or lease for 
 new oil and gas slant, directional, or offshore drilling in or under 
                    one or more of the Great Lakes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GREAT LAKES OIL AND GAS DRILLING BAN.

    No Federal or State permit or lease shall be issued for new oil and 
gas slant, directional, or offshore drilling in or under one or more of 
the Great Lakes.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``Great Lakes'' has the same meaning 
as provided by section 118(a)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 
Act (33 U.S.C. 1268(a)(3)).
                                 <all>
```
### §8432. Criminal penalties

Any person who willfully violates any provision of this chapter, or any rule or order thereunder, shall be subject to a fine of not more than $50,000, or to imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, for each violation.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title VII, §722, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3333; Pub. L. 100–42, §1(c)(19), May 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 313.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–42 struck out "(other than section 8372 of this title)" after "this chapter".
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SS.1350

     In  connection  with the  filing  with the  United  States  Securities  and
Exchange Commission of Emergent Group Inc.'s (the "Company") Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"),  the undersigned,
the Chief  Executive  Officer and the Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
hereby  certify that (i) in our  capacities as officers of the Company,  (ii) to
each of our own respective actual knowledge, and (iii) solely for the purpose of
compliance with 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of ss.13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

          The above  certification  is given as of the date of the Report and is
     limited to the periods covered by the Report.  The above  certification  is
     made severally and not jointly.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned have executed this Certificate on
August 12, 2003.



                                        By: /s/ Bruce J. Haber
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bruce J. Haber
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



                                       27
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2 CFO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Fleetclean Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 20, 2004

By:      /s/ R. Greg Smith
         -----------------
         R. Greg Smith
         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 2003.4 Officials to receive requests and inquiries.

Officials to receive requests and inquiries for access to, or correction of, records in OIG systems of records are the Privacy Act Officers described in § 2003.2 of this part. Written requests may be addressed to the appropriate Privacy Act Officer at: Office of Inspector General, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410.

[57 FR 62142, Dec. 29, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 14098, Mar. 25, 1994]
#### § 512.17 Purpose.

This subpart provides the standards to be followed by Broadcasting Board of Governors in implementing 5 U.S.C. 5514 to recover a debt from the pay of an Board employee or former employee, and establishes the procedural guidelines to recover debts when the employee's creditor and paying agencies are not the same.

[52 FR 43897, Nov. 17, 1987, as amended at 55 FR 3050, Jan. 30, 1990]
#### § 1000.208 What happens if an Indian tribe had two IHAs as of September 30, 1996?

Indian tribes which had established and were operating two IHAs as of September 30, 1996, under the 1937 Act shall be allowed to form and operate two TDHEs under NAHASDA. Nothing in this section shall affect the allocation of funds otherwise due to an Indian tribe under the formula.
§ 1006.350 Environmental review. ( a ) In order to ensure that the policies of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*) (NEPA) and other provisions of Federal law which further the purposes of that act (as specified in 24 CFR 58.5) are most effectively implemented in connection with the expenditure of NHHBG funds, HUD will provide for the release of funds for specific projects to the DHHL if the Director of the DHHL assumes all of the responsibilities for environmental review, decision-making, and action under NEPA and other provisions of Federal law which further the purposes of that act (as specified in 24 CFR 58.5) that would apply to HUD were HUD to undertake those projects as Federal projects.
( b ) An environmental review does not have to be completed before a HUD finding of compliance for the housing plan or amendments to the housing plan submitted by the DHHL.
( c ) No funds may be committed to a grant activity or project before the completion of the environmental review and approval of the request for release of funds and related certification required by sections 806(b) and 806(c) of the Act, except as authorized by 24 CFR part 58.
( d ) As set forth in section 806(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 24 CFR 58.77, HUD will: ( 1 ) Provide for the monitoring of environmental reviews performed by the DHHL under this section;
( 2 ) At its discretion, facilitate training for the performance of such reviews by the DHHL; and,
( 3 ) At its discretion, provide for the suspension or termination of the assumption of responsibilities under this section based upon a finding of substantial failure of the DHHL to execute responsibilities under this section.
[67 FR 40776, June 13, 2002, as amended at 89 FR 9763, Feb. 12, 2024]
Dismissed and Opinion Filed December 12, 2013 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01641-CV IN RE WESLEY WAYNE SAVANNAH, Relator Original Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F09-72992-U 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers Opinion by Justice FitzGerald The Court has before it relator’s application fo r writ of habeas corpus seeking relief under article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure from hi s 2010 conviction for burglary of a habitation with intent to commit aggravated assa ult. The facts and issues are known to the parties, so we need not recite them herein. This Court has no jurisdiction over post-conviction applications for writ of habeas under article 11.07. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P. A NN . arts. 11.05, 11.07 (West 2005); In re McFee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 717–18 (Tex. App.––Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Accordingly, we dismiss the application for writ of habeas
corpus.

131641F.P05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
### §§9471 to 9473. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §902(e)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 560

Section 9471, Pub. L. 96–398, title III, §315, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1595, related to performance contracts.

Section 9472, Pub. L. 96–398, title III, §316, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1595, related to performance standards.

Section 9473, Pub. L. 96–398, title III, §317, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1595, related to evaluation and monitoring of projects and activities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 902(h) of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 238l of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Consultant Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, Richard D. Helppie, Jr., Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Richard R. Sorensen, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief, that:

          1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

          Date: May 17, 2004                     /s/ Richard D. Helppie, Jr.
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Richard D. Helppie, Jr.
                                                Chief Executive Officer

          Date:  May 17, 2004                    /s/ Richard R. Sorensen
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Richard R. Sorensen
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Superior Consultant Holdings
Corporation and will be retained by Superior Consultant Holdings Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 304.10 Review of claim. ( a ) Upon receipt of the claim file from the head of the office concerned, the General Counsel will ascertain that all supporting papers are contained in the file.
( b ) After legal review and recommendation by the General Counsel, the Director of the Peace Corps will make a written determination on the claim, unless the claim is worth less than $5,000, in which case the Chief Financial Officer will make the written determination.
[34 FR 5840, Mar. 28, 1969, as amended at 73 FR 21528, Apr. 22, 2008; 73 FR 49943, Aug. 25, 2008]
§ 100.110 Discriminatory practices in residential real estate-related transactions. ( a ) This subpart provides the Department's interpretation of the conduct that is unlawful housing discrimination under section 805 of the Fair Housing Act.
( b ) It shall be unlawful for any person or other entity whose business includes engaging in residential real estate-related transactions to discriminate against any person in making available such a transaction, or in the terms or conditions of such a transaction, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
**Exhibit 32.1**Section 906 CertificationCertification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officers of PRA International (the “Company”) hereby certify, to such officers’knowledge, that:(i) the accompanying Annual Report of Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: March 14, 2007    Terrance J. Bieker  Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0650 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. AARON EUGENE MCLAUGHLIN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 24 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 16 2023

06/16/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0650