alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 241.840 Date of default. In computing loan insurance benefits, the date of default shall be considered as: ( a ) The date of the lender's acceleration of the debt because of the borrower's uncorrected failure to perform a covenant or obligation under the note or security instrument; or
( b ) The date of the first failure to make a monthly payment which subsequent payments by the borrower are insufficient to cover when applied to the overdue monthly payments in the order in which they become due.
( c ) The date of the lender's acceleration of the debt because of the borrower's default under the first conventional note and mortgage.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2889

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3 Diamino Isoindoline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2005

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3 Diamino Isoindoline.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 1,3 DIAMINO ISOINDOLINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.11.01 1H- Isoindole, 3 Amino 

(CAS No. 3468–11–9) (provided for in subheading 

2933.99.79) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2889 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           8,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                       886
<INVENTORY>                                    184,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               220,788
<PP&E>                                          91,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 297,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,417
<BONDS>                                         67,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   297,290
<SALES>                                        354,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               354,398
<CGS>                                          263,095
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,013
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,164
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
August 8, 2016

Mr. Curtis Bunch

Vice President of Exploration

Flanagan & Emerson Mining and Exploration LLC

543 Clay Street East

Suite 10

Monmouth

, OR 97361

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 2892

Dear Mr. Bunch :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and

have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation,

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your

petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program A nalyst
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**Certificationof Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)          the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 7, 2006 | /s/ Erick Mason         |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                   | Erick Mason             |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 41 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 41 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 3
February 1, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cv-01016-WHA Document 41 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 3
§ 206.105 Amount of MIP. ( a ) *Initial MIP.* The mortgagee shall pay to the Commissioner an initial MIP that does not exceed three percent of the maximum claim amount.
( b ) *Monthly MIP.* The Commissioner may establish and collect a monthly MIP, which will accrue daily from the closing date, at a rate not to exceed 1.50 percent of the remaining insured principal balance, or up to 1.55 percent for any mortgage involving an original principal obligation that is greater than 95 percent of appraised value of the property. A mortgagee may only add the monthly MIP to the loan balance when paid to the Commissioner.
( c ) *Calculation of the initial MIP.* The mortgagee shall calculate the initial MIP based on the amount of funds the borrower has elected to be made available during the First 12-Month Disbursement Period, except that the calculation shall not include any funds set aside in the Servicing Fee Set Aside, if applicable. The initial MIP calculation shall be determined based on the sum of the following amounts: ( 1 ) For adjustable interest rate HECMs, the amount of Mandatory Obligations, the amount disbursed to the borrower at loan closing, and the amount of the available Initial Disbursement Limit not taken by the borrower at loan closing that the borrower selects to remain available during the First 12-Month Disbursement Period.
( 2 ) For fixed interest rate HECMs, the amount of Mandatory Obligations and the amount disbursed to the borrower at loan closing.
( d ) *Adjustments to initial or monthly MIP.* The Commissioner may adjust the amount of any initial or monthly MIP through notice. Such notice shall establish the effective date of any premium adjustment therein.
### §8273. Purpose of program

The purpose of the program established by section 8272 of this title is to—

(1) accelerate the growth of a commercially viable and competitive industry to make photovoltaic solar electric systems available to the general public as an option in order to reduce national consumption of fossil fuel;

(2) reduce fossil fuel costs to the Federal Government;

(3) stimulate the general use within the Federal Government of methods for the minimization of life cycle costs; and

(4) develop performance data on the program established by section 8272 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title V, §564, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3280.)
§ 232.800 Definitions. All of the definitions contained in § 232.500 shall apply to this subpart. In addition, as used in this subpart, the following term shall have the meaning indicated: ( a ) *Contract of insurance* means the agreement evidenced by the endorsement of the Commissioner upon the note given in connection with an insured loan and includes the provisions of this subpart and the applicable provisions of the Act.
( b ) *Maturity* means the date on which the loan indebtedness would be extinguished if paid in accordance with periodic payments provided for in the loan.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50733 **consolidated with** No **. 21**

**- 50755**  Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Emeterio Mata**

**- Tarango,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.**
Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 190

- 1 USDC No. 4:18

- CR

- 850

- 1

Before **Davis, Jones,** and **Elrod,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Emeterio Mata

- Tarango appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b) (2) ,

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that thi s opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 23, 2022 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50733 Document: 00516214992 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2022No. 21

- 50733 c/w No. 21

- 50755

2 along with the revocation of a term of supervised release he was serving at the time of the offense

. He has not briefed the validity of the revocation of his supervised release or his revocation sentence and has, therefore, abandoned any challenge to them. See United States v. R eagan , 596 F.3d 251, 254

- 55 (5th Cir. 2010). For the first time on appeal, Mata

- Tarango contends that it violates the Constitution to treat a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, rather than as an element of the offense . He concedes that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve it for further review. Agreeing that the issue is foreclosed, t h e Government moves without opposition for summary affirmance, or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its brief

. The parties are correct that Mata

- Tarango’s assertion is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 54 6, 553

- 54 (5th Cir. 2019) . Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , s ee Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIED** , and the judgments of the district court are **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50733 Document: 00516214992 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2022
§ 92.1 Definitions. ( a ) In the United States the term *notary* or *notary public* means a public officer qualified and bonded under the laws of a particular jurisdiction for the performance of notarial acts, usually in connection with the execution of some document.
( b ) The term *notarial act* means an act recognized by law or usage as pertaining to the office of a notary public.
( c ) The term *notarial certificate* may be defined as the signed and sealed statement to which a “notarial act” is almost invariably reduced. The “notarial certificate” attests to the performance of the act by the notary, and may be an independent document or as in general American notarial practice, may be placed on or attached to the notarized document.
( d ) For purposes of this part, except §§ 92.36 through 92.42 relating to the authentication of documents, the term *notarizing officer* includes consular officers, officers of the Foreign Service who are secretaries of embassy or legation under Section 24 of the Act of August 18, 1856, 11 Stat. 61, as amended (22 U.S.C. 4221), and such U.S. citizen Department of State employees as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Overseas Citizens Services may designate for the purpose of performing notarial acts overseas pursuant to section 127(b) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994-1995, Pub. L. 103-236, April 30, 1994 (“designated employees”). The authority of designated employees to perform notarial services shall not include the authority to perform authentications, to notarize patent applications, or take testimony in a criminal action or proceeding pursuant to a commission issued by a court in the United States, but shall otherwise encompass all notarial acts, including but not limited to administering or taking oaths, affirmations, affidavits or depositions.
The notarial authority of a designated employee shall expire upon termination of the employee's assignment to such duty and may also be terminated at any time by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Overseas Citizen Services. [22 FR 10858, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 60 FR 51721, Oct. 3, 1995]
Todd C. Emerson, #8175 444 South River Road St. George, Utah, 84790 Telephone: (435) 634-3530 Facsimile: (435) 634-3505 

# RECEIVED FEB -4 2014 HEARING DOCKET

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASIDNGTON, D.C.

In the Matter of:

SkyWest Airlines, Inc. JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Case Numbers- See Below Honorable Richard C. Goodwin

Respondent, SkyWest Airlines, Inc. ("SkyWest"), by its counsel, and Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA''), by its counsel, respectfully request a stay ofthe following hearings currently scheduled for February 18, 2014 thru February 21, 2014 in Salt Lake City, Utah:
Case No. 2011NM060038 Case No. 2011NM060047 CaseNo. 2011NM060063 Case No. 2011NM060072 Case No. 2011NM060073 Case No. 2011NM060081 Case No. 2011NM060095 Case No. 2012NM060014 DMS No. FAA-2012-0874 DMS No. FAA-2012-0872 DMS No. FAA-2012-0873 DMS No. FAA-2012-0869 DMS No. FAA-2012-0868 DMS No. FAA-2012-0904 DMS No. FAA-2013-0617 DMS No. FAA-2013-0619 The parties are engaged in global settlement negotiations, which may result inthe resolution ofthese and other pending matters, and respectfully request that the above-referencedcases be stayed until the parties notify :the court offhta!. settlement, or in :the alternative, the desire to proceed to trial. With respectto Case No. 2011NM06QOQS. (I)MS No. FAA-2012·0777), the parties are each filing Motions for Decision and aheating is notrequired. With re!lpect to Case N<>, 2011NM060049 (DMS No. FAA-21}12-0776), the parties Mve settled this matter, and aNotice of Dismissal will be sent tothe court upon final execution.

DATED thls 31" day ofJanuary, :2014.

# ~wc.k=.- Todd C. Emerson Attomey

### ~lSkyWest

# c•s /1 ( -, J 

# t1./!ir:tilU"t,**/t...,__~-** Mtchael L. Dworki At!arney forfikyWestAirlines



# 4 ./1' 

# 1/%./17-**--···~·-.. ·········~··················~-·**  , Harper ·**~--** Y

for the FederalAviationAdministrationCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

# 3•0.. f"-ebn-ttt

## V''l The undersigned hereby certifies that onthis :;-pi day of:hn:mary, 2014, a true and correct
copy ofthe foregoing JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS was served as follows:
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor, Rm El2-320 Washington, D.C. 20590 {Federal Express} Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 {Federal Express}



### 3
### SUBCHAPTER I—PATENTS FOR PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS
#### Nasser ALMUTAIRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING BUREAU; Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-2292.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 18, 2007.

Decided: April 27, 2007.

Nasser Almutairi, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nasser Almutairi seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. However, following Almutairi’s filing of a notice of appeal, the district court reopened his suit, and it is currently pending. *See Al-mutairi v. Int’l Broadcasting Bureau,*No. 8:06-cv-02791-RWT (D.Md. Dec. 6, 2006) (reopening Case No. 8:06-cv-01929-RWT). Accordingly, we dismiss Almutairi’s appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.162 Certificates of claim.

The certificate of claim issued to the mortgagee at the time debentures are issued constitutes an agreement by the FHA that after the FHA has recovered its investment in a particular property any excess over and above such investment is available for payment on the certificate of claim. Certificates of claim bear interest at the rate of 3 percent per annum.
#### William M. Fiorito, Respondent, v. Frank Yaskulski, Jr., Doing Business as Fancher Hotel, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Brie Special Term permitting plaintiff to amend his amended complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Samuel Conti

Case 3:09-cv-00210-SC Document 30 Filed 07/09/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-00210-SC Document 30 Filed 07/09/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 241.1100 Prepayment privilege and charges. ( a ) *Prepayment privilege.* ( 1 ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the security instrument shall contain a provision permitting the borrower to prepay the loan, in whole or in part, upon any interest payment date after giving to the lender 30 days advance notice of its intention to prepay.
( 2 ) If the loan exceeds $200,000, the security instrument may contain a provision for an additional charge in the event of prepayment of principal as may be agreed upon between the borrower and lender. These charges shall not be imposed if the loan is accelerated at the request of the Commissioner, pursuant to § 241.1046(b). The borrower shall be permitted to prepay up to 15 percent of the original principal amount of the loan in any one calendar year without any additional charge. A provision for an additional charge in the event of prepayment may not be included in a loan of $200,000 or less.
( b ) *Prepayment of bond-financed loan.* Where the lender has obtained the funds for the loan by the issuance and sale of bonds or bond anticipation notes, or both, the loan may contain a prepayment restriction and prepayment penalty charges acceptable to the Commissioner as to term, amount, and conditions.
§ 180.415 Notice of proposed adverse action regarding Federal financial assistance in non-Fair Housing Act matters. ( a ) *Filing and service.* Within 10 days after a recipient/applicant has requested a hearing, as provided for in 24 CFR parts 1, 6, 8, or 146, the General Counsel shall file a notice of proposed adverse action with the Docket Clerk and serve copies (with the additional information required under paragraph (b) of this section) on all respondents and complainants.
( b ) *Contents.* The notice of proposed adverse action shall consist of a short and plain written statement of the facts and legal authority upon which the proposed action is based. A notification shall be served with the notice containing the following information: ( 1 ) That an administrative hearing will be held at a date and place specified.
( 2 ) That the respondent will have an opportunity to file an answer to the notice of adverse action within 30 days after its service.
( 3 ) That the complainant may participate as an amicus curiae by filing a timely request to do so.
( 4 ) That discovery must be concluded by a date specified.
( 5 ) That the rules specified in this part shall govern the proceeding.
( c ) *Consolidation.* The ALJ may provide for non-Fair Housing Act proceedings at HUD to be joined or consolidated for hearing with proceedings in other Federal departments or agencies, by agreement with such other departments or agencies. All parties to any proceeding consolidated subsequent to service of the notice of proposed adverse action shall be promptly served with notice of such consolidation.
[61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 3802, Jan. 25, 1999; 74 FR 4636, Jan. 26, 2009]
STEVE MORRISSEY

MANAGING DIRECTOR—REGULATORY AND POLICY

(202) 296-2733 

(202) 296-2873 FAX

STEVE.MORRISSEY@UNITED.COM

January 18, 2011 

Esta Rosenberg, Chief 

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Blanket Statements of Authorization of United Air Lines, Inc. and Air New Zealand 

Limited (Docket DOT-OST-1999-6013) and Continental Airlines, Inc. and Air New 

Zealand Limited (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0340) 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

 

 Pursuant to the blanket Statements of Authorization granted by the Department to United 

Air Lines, Inc. (“United”) and Air New Zealand Limited (“ANZ”) on August 6, 1999 (Docket 

DOT-OST-1999-6013) and to Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental”) and ANZ on January 26, 

2010 (Docket DOT-OST-2009-0340), United/Continental hereby notifies the Department that 

ANZ’s “NZ” designator code will be placed on the following flights: 

 

 United-operated flights between San Francisco and Los Angeles, CA-Mexico City, 

Mexico; and 

 Continental-operated flights between Los Angeles, CA-Leon/Guanajuato, Mexico. 

 The proposed code-share services are fully consistent with applicable bilateral 

agreements. The carriers intend to implement these services on or after February 17, 2011. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 Steve Morrissey 

 Managing Director, Regulatory & Policy 

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

cc: George Wellington Linda Lundell Dan Weiss 

Brian Hedberg Charles Hunnicutt 

 Brett Kruger Susan Gotbetter 
 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all 

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email: 

 

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com 

jeff.morgan@delta.com 

jyoung@yklaw.com (Spirit) 

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

efaberman@wileyrein.com (Air Tran/Frontier)

howard.kass@usairways.com 

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Hawaiian/Jet Blue)

john.allen@faa.gov 

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com 

msinick@ssd.com (Alaska)

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com (USA 3000)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

urskr@state.gov 

william.stallings@usdoj.gov 

Annalei Avanceña 

Dated: January 18, 2011