alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 512.11 Administrative offset against amounts payable from Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund. ( a ) Unless otherwise prohibited by law, Broadcasting Board of Governors may request that monies that are due and payable to a debtor from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund be administratively offset in reasonable amounts in order to collect in one full payments, or a minimal number of payment, debts owed the United States by the debtor. Such requests shall be made to the appropriate officials within the Office of Personnel Management in accordance with such regulations as may be prescribed by the Director of that Office.
( b ) When making a request for administrative offset under paragraph (a) of this section, Broadcasting Board of Governors shall include written statements that: ( 1 ) The debtor owes the United States a debt, including the amount of the debt;
( 2 ) The Broadcasting Board of Governors has complied with the applicable statutes, regulations, and procedures of the Office of Personnel Management; and
( 3 ) The Broadcasting Board of Governors has complied with the requirements of § 512.10 of this part, including any required hearing or review.
( c ) Once Broadcasting Board of Governors decides to request offset under paragraph (a) of this section, it will make the request as soon as practical after completion of the applicable procedures in order that the Office of Personnel Management may identify the debtor's account in anticipation of the time when the debtor requests or becomes eligible to receive payments from the Fund. This will satisfy any requirement that offset be initiated prior to expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
( d ) If Broadcasting Board of Governors collects part or all of the debt by other means before deductions are made or completed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, Broadcasting Board of Governors shall act promptly to modify or terminate its request for offset under paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) This section does not require or authorize the Office of Personnel Management to review the merits of the Broadcasting Board of Governors determination relative to the amount and validity of the debt, its determination on waiver under an applicable statute, or its determination whether to provide an oral hearing.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.190 HUD list of qualified 203(k) consultants. ( a ) *Qualified consultant list.* HUD maintains a list of qualified consultants for use in the rehabilitation loan insurance program authorized by section 203(k) of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(k)) (referred to as the “203(k) Program”).
( b ) *Consultant functions.* Only a consultant included on the list may be selected by the lender to conduct any consultant function under the 203(k) Program (see § 203.50(l) of this title).
( c ) *Disclaimer.* The inclusion of a consultant on the list means only that the consultant has met the qualifications and conditions prescribed by the Secretary for placement on the list of consultants qualified for the 203(k) Program. The inclusion of a consultant on the list does not create or imply a warranty or endorsement by HUD of the consultant, nor does it represent a warranty of any work performed by the consultant.
[67 FR 52380, Aug. 9, 2002]
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO INTERBRANCH COMMISSION FOR GENDER, RACIAL AND ETHNIC FAIRNESS : : : : : : : No. 478 JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCK ET

**ORDER**
**PER CURIA M** 
AND NOW , this 18 th day of January , 201 7 , Katherine J. Gomez, Esquire, Philadelphia, is hereby appointed as a member of the Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness for a term expiring December 31, 201 8

.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2749 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2749

To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind the counter 
                            in retail sales.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require cigarette products to be placed under or behind the counter 
                            in retail sales.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETAIL SALES OF CIGARETTE PRODUCTS.

    (a) Product Placement.--It shall be unlawful for any person engaged 
in the retail sales of cigarette products to place cigarette products 
in the general merchandise areas of a retail sales facility and within 
reach of customers. All cigarette products sold at retail must be 
placed under or behind a counter where they may be accessible only to a 
salesperson.
    (b) Enforcement.--
            (1) Unfair and deceptive act or practice.--A violation of 
        this Act shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an 
        unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under section 
        18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 
        57a(a)(1)(B)).
            (2) Enforcement authority.--The Federal Trade Commission 
        shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, 
        and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though 
        all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade 
        Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into 
        and made a part of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2543 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2543

 To suspend temporarily the duty on stoppers, lids, and other closures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

Mr. Kuhl of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on stoppers, lids, and other closures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STOPPERS, LIDS, AND OTHER CLOSURES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.70.10       Stoppers, lids,    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         and other                                                          31/2009
                         closures of low
                         expansion
                         borosilicate
                         glass or alumino-
                         borosilicate
                         glass, having a
                         linear
                         coefficient of
                         expansion not
                         exceeding 3.3 x
                         10-7 per Kelvin
                         within a
                         temperature range
                         of 0 to 300 C,
                         produced by
                         automatic machine
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         7010.20.20) or
                         produced by hand
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         7010.20.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William A. Houlihan, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ William A. HoulihanWilliam A. HoulihanNovember 9, 2004
    Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Compensation Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors




     Effective January 1, 2011, each Non-Employee Director of Johnson & Johnson will receive an
annual fee of $110,000 for his or her services as a Director (an increase from $100,000). In
addition, Directors receive $5,000 (per committee) for service on a standing committee of the Board
of Directors or $15,000 (per committee) if Chairman of the committee. The Presiding Director is
paid an additional annual fee of $25,000 (an increase from $10,000). Non-Employee Directors are
eligible to receive meeting fees of $1,500 per day if they attend a committee meeting held on a day
other than a Board meeting day, except that no meetings fees are paid if such a meeting is a
telephonic meeting. Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional compensation
for their services as Directors or as members of Board committees.



     Under the Johnson & Johnson 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, each Non-Employee Director receives
non-retainer equity compensation each year in the form of shares of restricted Company Common Stock
having a value of $100,000 on the grant date. The restricted shares become freely transferable on
the third anniversary of the grant date. In addition, each Non-Employee Director receives a
one-time grant of 1,000 shares of unrestricted Company Common Stock upon first becoming a member of
the Board of Directors. Non-Employee Directors are subject to the Stock Ownership Guidelines for
Directors and Executive Officers described in the Johnson & Johnson Proxy Statement, dated March
17, 2010.



     Under the Deferred Fee Plan for Non-Employee Directors, a Non-Employee Director may elect to
defer payment of all or a portion of his or her fees until or beyond termination of his or her
directorship. Deferred fees earn additional amounts based on a hypothetical investment in the
Company’s Common Stock. All Common Stock equivalent units held in each Non-Employee Director’s
Deferred Fee Account receive dividend equivalents in the same amount and at the same time as
dividends on the Company’s Common Stock.



     Non-Employee Directors are eligible to participate in the Company’s charitable matching gift
program for employees, pursuant to which the Company will contribute, on a two-to-one basis, up to
$20,000 per year per employee or Non-Employee Director to educational and certain other charitable
institutions.



     The Company pays for or provides (or reimburses Directors for out-of-pocket costs incurred
for) transportation, hotel, food and other incidental expenses related to attending Board and
committee meetings or participating in director education programs and other director orientation
or educational meetings.
1 The Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1364

___________ Len Edwin Davis, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Appeal from the United States Department of Correction; Max * District Court for the Mobley, Deputy Director of Health; * Eastern District of Arkansas Greg Harmon, Warden, Tucker * Maximum Security Unit, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 7, 1999 Filed: November 1, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. LenEdwin Davis, a federal inmate being housed at Tucker Maximum Security Prison inArkansas, appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for-2-

the Eastern District of Arkansas, granting summary judgment to prison officials in Davis & s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Davis claimed defendants showed deliberate indifference to his serious dental needs by denying him a root canal and by delaying dental treatment. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. Upon de novo review, see Dulany v. Carnahan , 132 F.3d 1234, 1237 (8th Cir. 1997), we conclude summary judgment was proper. The summary judgment record, viewed most favorably to Davis, shows that while one examining dentist had re commended a root canal, another had recommended extraction. Thus, the record shows only a disagreement over a particular type of dental procedure. See Long v. Nix , 86 F.3d 761, 765 (8th Cir. 1996) (inmate does not have constitutional right to any particular type of treatment; prison officials do not violate Eighth Amendment when, in exercise of their professional judgment, they refuse to implement inmate’s requested course of treatment); Vaughan v. Lacey , 49 F.3d 1344, 1346 (8th Cir. 1995) (doctors’ disagreement

as to proper course of prisoner & s treatment is not actionable under Eighth Amendment). We also conclude Davis failed to present a triable issue of fact on his claim that defendants subjected him to an unconstitutional delay in treatment. See Coleman v. Rahija , 114 F.3d 778, 784 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 51337 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BRYAN RANDALL BARRETT , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 138

- 1

Before JOLLY , HIGGINBOTHAM , and ELROD , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Bryan Randall Barrett has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barrett h a s not filed a respon se. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-51337 Document: 00514122244 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 51337

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-51337 Document: 00514122244 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
§ 1006.310 Rent and lease-purchase limitations. ( a ) *Rents.* The DHHL must develop and follow written policies governing rents for rental housing units assisted with NHHBG funds, including methods by which rents are determined. ( 1 ) *Maximum and minimum rent.* The maximum monthly tenant rent payment for a low-income family may not exceed 30 percent of the family's monthly adjusted income. DHHL may also decide to compute rental or homebuyer payments on any lesser percentage of the adjusted income of the family. The Act does not set minimum rent or homebuyer payments; however, DHHL may do so.
( 2 ) *Flat or income-adjusted rent.* Flat rent means the tenant's rent payment is set at a specific dollar amount or specific percent of market rent. Income-adjusted rent means the tenant's rent payment varies based on the tenant's income (*i.e.,* 30 percent of monthly adjusted income). DHHL may charge flat or income-adjusted rents, provided the rental or homebuyer payment of the low-income family does not exceed 30 percent of the family's adjusted income.
( 3 ) *Utilities.* Utilities may be considered a part of rent or homebuyer payments if DHHL decides to define rent or homebuyer payments to include utilities in its written policies on rents and homebuyer payments required by section 811(a)(1) of NAHASDA. DHHL may define rents and homebuyer payments to exclude utilities.
( b ) *Lease-purchase.* If DHHL assists low-income families to become homeowners of rental housing through a long-term lease (*i.e.,* 10 or more years) with an option to purchase the housing, DHHL must develop and follow written policies governing lease-purchase payments (*i.e.,* homebuyer payments) for rental housing units assisted with NHHBG funds, including methods by which payments are determined. The maximum monthly payment for a low-income family may not exceed 30 percent of the family's monthly adjusted income.
( c ) *Exception for certain homeownership payments.* Homeownership payments for families who are not low-income, as permitted under § 1006.301(b), are not subject to the requirement that homebuyer payments may not exceed 30 percent of the monthly adjusted income of that family.
( d ) *Applicability.* Low-income families who receive homeownership assistance other than lease-purchase assistance are not subject to the limitations in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[89 FR 9762, Feb. 12, 2024]
#### § 180.450 Resolution of charge or notice of proposed adverse action.

At any time before a final decision is issued, the parties may submit to the ALJ an agreement resolving the charge or notice of proposed adverse action. A charge under the Fair Housing Act can only be resolved with the agreement of the aggrieved person on whose behalf the charge was issued. If the agreement is in the public interest, the ALJ shall accept it by issuing an initial decision and consent order based on the agreement.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2703 

To suspend temporarily the duty on [2,2′-Bi-1H-indole]-3,3′-diol-, potassium 

sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on [2,2′-Bi-1H-indole]-3,3′- 

diol-, potassium sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. [2,2′-BI-1H-INDOLE]-3,3′-DIOL, POTASSIUM SO4 DIUM SALT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.20 [2,2′-Bi-1H-indole]-3,3′-diol, 

potassium sodium salt (CAS 

No. 207692–02–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.15.40) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2703 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Metris Companies Inc. for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,013
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,653
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        154,077
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,209
<DEPOSITS>                                       1,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                    53,385
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             67,810
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           160
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 208,209
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,583
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  644
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   120
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,347
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  36
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,823
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,524
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,556
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 68,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,896
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      14,696
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.178
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,789
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,679
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,816
<RECOVERIES>                                       121
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,540
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,540
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 214.109 Disapproval by HUD.

If an application package does not meet all requirements in § 214.103, HUD will provide the agency with the reasons for the denial in writing. Within 30 calendar days of the written notice of denial, the agency may submit a revised application, or appeal HUD's decision in writing to HUD, as provided in § 214.205. If an agency decides to submit a revised application, the agency may consult HUD, to determine the specific actions needed to resolve the deficiencies.