1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO POSTPONE HEARING AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

Davis v. Astrue, C 06-6108 MHP

Doe v. Astrue, C 09-980 MHP

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (SBN 44332)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (SBN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

MICHAEL T. PYLE (SBN 172954)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-7322

Facsimile: (415) 436-6748

Email: michael.pyle@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Federal Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

TERRENCE DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

 

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 06-6108 MHP

No. C 09-980 MHP

E-FILING CASE

STIPULATION TO POSTPONE

FEBRUARY 22, 2010 HEARING IN

DAVIS TO MARCH 15, 2010 AT 2:00

P.M. AND TO SCHEDULE STATUS

CONFERENCE IN DOE FOR MARCH

15, 2010 AT 2:00 P.M. AND

(PROPOSED) ORDER

LR 7-12

1. Pursuant Local Rule 7-12 the parties ask the Court to postpone the February 22, 2010

hearing on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment in Davis v. Astrue, C 06-6108 MPH

to Monday, March 15, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. or to a date at the Court’s earliest convenience. 

Case 3:09-cv-00980-EMC Document 44 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION TO POSTPONE HEARING AND (PROPOSED) ORDER

Davis v. Astrue, C 06-6108 MHP

Doe v. Astrue, C 09-980 MHP 2

2. Defendant Social Security Administration (SSA) requested this continuance to

continue its efforts to determine the extent to which it can obtain the information requested by

plaintiffs and the costs associated with the data retrieval, efforts that have been disrupted by the

blizzard on the East Coast. 

3. Plaintiffs have no objection to the proposed postponement. 

4. In related case Doe v. Astrue, C 09-980 MHP, the parties are scheduled to meet and

confer regarding discovery issues on February 24, 2010. Pursuant to the Court’s order dated

August 28, 2009, the parties are to request a status conference three weeks thereafter. The parties

request that the status conference regarding any discovery issues in the Doe case also be

scheduled for March 15, 2010 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

Date: /s/ 

JOANN M. SWANSON

Assistant United States Attorney

 

Date: /s/ 

STEVEN BRUCE

Attorney for Plaintiff

Based on the foregoing and good cause appearing, the hearing on defendant’s motion for

partial summary judgment in Davis v. Astrue scheduled for Monday, February 22, 2010 at 2:00

p.m. is postponed until Monday, March 15, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. The status conference regarding

discovery issues in Doe v. Astrue is also scheduled for that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

MARILYN HALL PATEL

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

2/18/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-00980-EMC Document 44 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 2