alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 20

, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delivery of Vine Rangers' UAS Operations Manual [Docket No. FAA

- 2015

-

005 9]

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Vine Ranger s Inc.

, (" Vine Rangers ") regarding

the above

- referenced Petition for Exemption, in which Vine Rangers seeks regulatory relief to

allow commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft system

. Please accept this letter as

confirmation that Vine Rangers' UAS Operations Manual, which contains proprietary

information, was hand

- delivered to Jake J. Troutman, Program Analyst, Federal Aviation

Administration, Office of Aviat ion Safety, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division , on March 19,

2015.

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process this

exemption request, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours,

Matthew J. Clark

Lisa M. Ellman

Mark E. McKinnon

Counsel for Vine Rangers , Inc. Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKi nnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.8714

Lisa M. Ellman

202.496.7184 Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com

lellman@mckennalong.com
de sty 

Parraguirre 

C11,24 

Cherry 

Sunde v. Contel of California, 112 Nev. 541, 542-43, 915 P.2d 298, 299 

(1996) (explaining that nonlawyers may not represent entities in court); 

Salman v. Newell,110 Nev. 1333, 1336, 885 P.2d 607, 608 (1994) 

(observing that no statute or rule permits a nonlawyer to represent an 

entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person). As 

we do not allow laypersons to represent parties or entities and business 

entities are not permitted to appear or file documents in proper person, 

respondent's answer and all other motions and documents filed in the 

district court by respondent were improper and should have been stricken 

by the district court. Stu's Bail Bonds,115 Nev.at 436 n.1, 991 P.2d at 470 

n.1; Sunde,112 Nev. at 542-43, 915 P.2d at 299; Salman,110 Nev. at 

1336, 885 P.2d at 608. Respondent's motion to dismiss was, therefore, also 

improperly considered by the district court and the district court erred in 

considering and granting the motion. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with 

this order.' 

/ 

"In light of this order, we deny as moot appellant's December 19, 

2012, proper person motion. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A m3(t_111 

2 
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge 

Alexander Falconi 

Corazon Real Estate 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

DANIEL P. BLANK

Assistant Federal Public Defender

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant ANGUIANO-MARTINEZ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JESUS ANGUIANO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-1164 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

HEARING

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01164-MHP Document 15 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sentencing for Jesus Anguiano-Martinez, the defendant in the above-captioned case, is

currently set for May 24, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. However, a jury trial in a separate case, in which the

defendant is represented by undersigned counsel for Mr. Anguiano-Martinez, has been set for that

same morning. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the sentencing hearing for

Mr. Anguiano-Martinez be continued to June 7, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. U.S. Probation Officer Waseem

Iqbal does not object to this request.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

 United States Attorney

DATED: April 13, 2010 ____/s/_______________________

PATRICIA SPALETTA

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: April 13, 2010 ____/s/_______________________

DANIEL P. BLANK

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for Jesus Anguiano-Martinez

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

STIP. & PROP. ORDER 1

4/14/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01164-MHP Document 15 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2
SCWC-18-0000071

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB,

D/B/A CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE

FOR PRETIUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

TERRENCE RYAN and LUCILLE RYAN,

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants,

and

FIRST LIGHT ENTERPRISES LLC; BLUE WATER ALLIANCE, LLC,

Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000071; CAAP-18-0000312; CAAP-18-0000388;

CIV. NO. 5CC121000306)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and 

Circuit Judge Tonaki, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants Terrence Ryan and 

Lucille Ryan’s application for writ of certiorari filed on July 

6, 2020, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000071

02-SEP-2020

10:19 AM
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move 

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 2, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ John M. Tonaki

2
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 11363          Edition: 43          Edition Date: July 2011          Clear Dates: NM - 10/1/2011     LNM - 9/20/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 6538 Dir iD: 2015 - NM - 031 - AD
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,997,864
<SECURITIES>                                 5,000,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                    120,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,615,716
<PP&E>                                       2,078,471
<DEPRECIATION>                                 636,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,325,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,015,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 19,524,452
<COMMON>                                        62,606
<OTHER-SE>                                   (405,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,325,925
<SALES>                                      3,472,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,472,299
<CGS>                                        1,031,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,031,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,219,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,219,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.22)
        

</TABLE>
### §7385j–1. Social Security earnings information

Notwithstanding the provision of section 552a of title 5 or any other provision of Federal or State law, the Social Security Administration shall make available to the Secretary of Labor, upon written request, the Social Security earnings information of living or deceased employees who may have sustained an illness that is the subject of a claim under this subchapter, which the Secretary of Labor may require to carry out the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3652], as added Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3163(b), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2187.)
Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1




R.G. BARRY CORPORATION

BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PROGRAM




The Compensation Program for non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) is as
follows:



Annual Retainer: $73,500 for each twelve-month period following the annual meeting of shareholders.
The directors have the election to receive 25%, 50% or 100% of such amount in an Equity Award as
described below. The balance is paid in cash in quarterly installments. No separate meeting fees
are paid to the directors.



Equity Award. The director can elect to receive his or her Equity Award in the form of fully-paid
common shares or stock units. The common shares or stock units are issued to the director
following authorization by the Board at the meeting of the Board that immediately follows the
annual meeting of shareholders. The number of common shares or stock units granted annually to a
director is determining by dividing the amount of the Annual Retainer that the director has elected
to receive in the form of an Equity Award by the market value of one common share of the Company at
the close of the market on the date of grant. As required by the plan under which the common shares
and stock units are granted, directors must submit their elections regarding the form of their
Equity Awards for approval by the full Board before the Equity Awards are granted and as a
condition to any grant.



Stock units convert into common shares when the director leaves the Board. Stock units are
accompanied by dividend equivalent rights so that the director receives, when he or she leaves the
Board, an amount in cash equal to the aggregate amount of dividends paid on an equivalent number of
common shares from the date of grant of the corresponding stock units through the date such stock
units are converted into common shares.



Directors appointed to serve less than a full term (e.g., to fill out a term) may be granted a
prorated number of common shares or stock units when they join the Board as determined by the
Board.



Non-Executive Chairman Retainer: An additional retainer in the amount of $8,876 is paid to the
Non-Executive Chairman in cash in quarterly installments. The Non-Executive Chairman does not
serve as the chair of any of the standing Board committees.



Committee Chair Retainer: The following additional annual retainer amounts are paid to each
committee chair: $8,876 for Audit Committee Chair, $8,876 for Compensation Committee Chair and
$8,876 for Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair. The Company also pays a fee of
$500 per committee meeting to the director or directors who serves on the Company’s pension plan
committee, a committee that is not comprised solely of members of the Board and meets normally four
times per year. These retainers are paid in cash in quarterly installments.



Ad-hoc/Special Committees: Compensation to be determined by the Board, as applicable.



Effective Date: Adopted by Board of Directors approval at the September 2, 2010 meeting of the
Board of Directors to be in effect with the November 4, 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.35 Appraisal standards—nondiscrimination requirements. ( a ) *Nondiscrimination in the selection of appraiser.* In the selection of an appraiser, there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
( b ) *Nondiscrimination in appraisal determination.* The certification required by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice must include a statement that the racial/ethnic composition of the neighborhood surrounding the property in no way affected the appraisal determination.
§ 206.103 Payment of MIP. ( a ) The payment of any MIP due under this subpart shall be made to the Commissioner by the mortgagee in cash until an event described in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section occurs.
( b ) *Payment of the mortgage.* The MIP shall no longer be remitted if the mortgage is paid in full.
( c ) *Acquisition of title.* ( 1 ) If the mortgagee or a party other than the mortgagee acquires title at a foreclosure sale, or the mortgagee acquires title by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, and the mortgagee notifies the Commissioner that a claim for the payment of the insurance benefits will not be presented, the MIP shall no longer be remitted.
( 2 ) If the mortgagee or a party other than the mortgagee acquires title at a foreclosure sale or the mortgagee acquires title by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, or where the property is sold in accordance with § 206.125(c), and a claim for the payment of the insurance benefits will be presented, the MIP shall no longer be remitted as of the date of the foreclosure sale, the date the deed in lieu of foreclosure is recorded, or the date in which the sale in accordance with § 206.125(c) is completed, as applicable.
### SERVED: October 22, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF 

### ALASKAAIRLINES, INC.

FAADOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action)
FDMS No. FAA-2013-0287



### ORDERDENYING RESPONDENT'S MOTIONFOR CLARIFICATiON Respondent AlaskaAirlines, Inc. ("Respondent") has filed a Motion for Clarification ("Motion") ofmy Order dated August 30, 2013. That Order granted inpart and denied inpart its Motionto Compel. ComplainantFederal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has filed in opposition to the Motion. Respondent's Motion does little more thanrehash the arguments rejected in the August 30, 2013 Order concerning its Motionto Compel. No reason has been advanced to warrant reconsideration ofthose arguments. Clarification, moreover, is a misplaced remedy. The August 30 Order is clear and unambiguous.
Forthe reasons stated, Respondent's Motion is DENIED. 1

1 The parties are againreminded thatthis case is about whether Complainant can prove its charges; nothingmore, nothing Jess.

### 23

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 TEL: 202-385-8229 FAX: 202-493-5142 ONE COPY Joanna L. Simon, Respondent's Counsel Morrison & Foerster, LLP 12531 High BluffDrive San Diego, CA 92130-2040 TEL: 858-720-5100 FAX: 858-720-5125 Email: JoannaSimon@mofo.com Bradley Tilde, President Alaska Airlines, Inc., Respondent P.0. Box 68900 Seattle, Washington 96168 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel FAA Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 E-MAIL: robert.spitzer@faa.gov FDMS No. FAA-2013-0287 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WJOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
ex10_55.htm









Exhibit 10.55


SECOND AMENDMENT


TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT







The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the "Employer") and Robert M. Jakobe (the "Employee") wish to amend the Employee's Employment and Non-Competition Agreement dated April 1, 2007 (the "Agreement") to (i) bring the Agreement into compliance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and other authoritative guidance issued under that section, pursuant to IRS Notice 2010-6, and (ii) provide additional severance benefits.







Accordingly, the Agreement is amended as follows:







1.  Effective September 1, 2010, a new item (E) is added to Section 6(e)(i) to read as follows:







"and (E) payment of reasonable expenses related to career transition services (outplacement) with a mutually agreed upon provider, in accordance with the Employer's outplacement schedule of benefits."







2.  Effective September 1, 2010, paragraph (ii) of Section 6(e) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:







"(ii) The Employer shall not reduce the amount payable under the provisions of Section 6(e)(i)  if the Employee accepts other employment during the Severance Period."







3.  Effective April 1, 2007, Section 10(g) – Arbitration of Disputes – is amended by deleting the sentence that was added to the end of that Section by Amendment No. 1 and by replacing it in its entirety with the following new language:







"The Employee's right to reimbursement of expenses by the Employer under this Section is available to the Employee during the Employee's lifetime.  The amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement during one calendar year shall not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement in any other calendar year. Any reimbursement of an eligible expense shall be made to the Employee by the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense was incurred."







4.  Effective April 1, 2007, Section 10(i) – Governing Law – is amended by adding the following new sentence to the end of that Section:







"To the extent Code section 409A applies, the terms of this Agreement shall be interpreted as necessary to comply with the requirements of Code section 409A."







In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.






  





  











  








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective as specified herein.








	
ATTEST/WITNESS:

	  	
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Robert M. Jakobe	 	 	/s/ John A. Saxton
	  	  	  	  	  
	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	
Print Name:

	
John A. Saxton


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
Date:

	
August 31, 2010


	  	  	  	  	  
	 	

/s/ Dale A. Tepp

	 	/s/ Robert M. Jakobe
	  	  	  	
Robert M. Jakobe


	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	  	  
	  	  	  	
Date:

	
September 8, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 268 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 268

      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

   Mr. Camp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF APPLICABILITY OF SUNSET OF THE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND 
              TAX RELIEF RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2001 WITH RESPECT TO 
              ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 shall not apply to the amendments made by section 202 of such 
Act (relating to expansion of adoption credit and adoption assistance 
programs).
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133358(74) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, STEVEN PRICE, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 133358 

 COA: 257577 

Court of Claims: 01-018063-MT 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 26, 2007 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

CAVANAGH J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant 

leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration. 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Case 3:08-cv-01748-CRB Document 10 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-01748-CRB Document 10 Filed 03/03/10 Page 2 of 2
### §2385. Installations transferable

All municipal installations are authorized to be transferred under this subchapter, but shall not include property which the Commission determines to be needed for its own use.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 8, §85, 69 Stat. 481.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.