alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 180.205 Authority. The ALJ shall have all powers necessary to conduct fair, expeditious and impartial hearings, including the power to: ( a ) Administer oaths and affirmations and examine witnesses;
( b ) Rule on offers of proof and receive evidence;
( c ) Take depositions or have depositions taken when the ends of justice would be served;
( d ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of persons at the hearing;
( e ) Hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;
( f ) Rule on motions, procedural requests, and similar matters;
( g ) Make and issue initial decisions;
( h ) Impose appropriate sanctions against any person failing to obey an order, refusing to adhere to reasonable standards of orderly and ethical conduct, or refusing to act in good faith;
( i ) Issue subpoenas if authorized by law; and
( j ) Exercise any other powers necessary and appropriate for the purpose and conduct of the proceeding as authorized by the rules in this part or in conformance with statute, including 5 U.S.C. 551-59.
Case 3:09-cv-01015-MMC Document 21 Filed 01/29/10 Page 1 of 2
January 29, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-01015-MMC Document 21 Filed 01/29/10 Page 2 of 2
### §1174. Repealed. Aug. 28, 1937, ch. 876, title II, 50 Stat. 876

Section, act May 25, 1920, ch. 200, 41 Stat. 622, related to sale of class 3 of revested Oregon and California Railroad grant lands. See sections 2601 to 2605 of this title and Repeals note set out under section 2601 of this title.
#### Vincent Ortiz, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[833 NYS2d 490]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered on or about December 2, 2005, dismissing the complaint as against defendants City of New York and Samuel Diaz, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs opening statement failed to make out a prima facie case of negligence against the driver of the car involved in the alleged accident. Therefore, there could have been no finding of liability against the car’s owner, defendant Diaz, since any liability on his part would have been derivative of the driver’s (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 [1]). Accordingly, the court properly dismissed the action as against Diaz immediately after opening statements *(see Giroux v Snedecor,*178 AD2d 802 [1991]).

The complaint against the City was properly dismissed at the close of evidence. Even if the City created the bump to which plaintiff attributes the accident in which he was injured, there was no competent evidence that the bump was hazardous at the *360time of its creation *(see Bielecki v City of New York,*14 AD3d 301 [2005]). The trial court properly precluded the testimony of plaintiffs expert, since there was no showing that the proposed testimony would clarify an issue involving professional or technical knowledge beyond the ken of the typical juror *(see GMAC Commercial Credit v Mitchell-B.J. Ltd.,*272 AD2d 51 [2000]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
#### Hutchinson *v.*Schnauss, administrator, *et al.*

July 9, 1912.

Injunction. Before Judge Thomas. Berrien superior court August 16, 1911.

*O. M. Smith*and *Twiggs & Gazan,*for plaintiff.

*W. D. Buie*and *Denmark & Griffin,*for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

The judge did not abuse his discretion in granting an order enjoining both the plaintiff and the defendants, which order tended to preserve the status until final trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsReport of the LSPI/NASA Workshop on Lunar Base Methodology DevelopmentGroundwork was laid for computer models which will assist in the design of a manned lunar base. The models, herein described, will provide the following functions for the successful conclusion of that task: strategic planning; sensitivity analyses; impact analyses; and documentation. Topics addressed include: upper level model description; interrelationship matrix; user community; model features; model descriptions; system implementation; model management; and plans for future action.Document ID19870009983Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsNozette, Stewart*(Large Scale Programs Inst. Austin, TX, United States)*Roberts, Barney*(Large Scale Programs Inst. Austin, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 18, 1985Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171975NASA-CR-171975Accession Number87N19416Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG9-116Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009983.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Case 3:09-cv-00541-BZ   Document 12   Filed 06/25/10   Page 1 of 3

Case 3:09-cv-00541-BZ   Document 12   Filed 06/25/10   Page 2 of 3

Case 3:09-cv-00541-BZ   Document 12   Filed 06/25/10   Page 3 of 3
### §7144e. Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs

#### (a) Establishment

There is established within the Department an Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs (referred to in this section as the "Office"). The Office shall be headed by a Director, who shall be appointed by the Secretary and compensated at a rate equal to that of level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5.

#### (b) Duties of Director

The Director, in accordance with Federal policies promoting Indian self-determination and the purposes of this chapter, shall provide, direct, foster, coordinate, and implement energy planning, education, management, conservation, and delivery programs of the Department that—

(1) promote Indian tribal energy development, efficiency, and use;

(2) reduce or stabilize energy costs;

(3) enhance and strengthen Indian tribal energy and economic infrastructure relating to natural resource development and electrification; and

(4) bring electrical power and service to Indian land and the homes of tribal members located on Indian lands or acquired, constructed, or improved (in whole or in part) with Federal funds.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title II, §217, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title V, §502(a), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 763.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565, known as the Department of Energy Organization Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7101 of this title and Tables.
§ 247.2 Definitions. *Drug-related criminal activity* means the illegal manufacture, sale, distribution, use or possession with the intent to manufacture, sell, distribute, or use, of a controlled substance as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 802.
*Eviction* means the dispossession of the tenant from the leased unit as a result of the termination of the tenancy, including a termination prior to the end of a term or at the end of a term.
*Landlord* means either the owner of the property or his representative, or the managing agent or his representative, as shall be designated by the owner.
*Rental agreement* means all agreements, written or oral, between the landlord and tenant (and valid rules and regulations adopted by the landlord pursuant to a written agreement) relating to the use and occupancy of a dwelling unit and surrounding premises.
*State landlord and tenant act* means any state statute or local ordinance which imposes obligations on a landlord and tenant in connection with the occupancy of a dwelling unit and surrounding premises and which provides that violations of such obligations by the tenant constitute grounds for eviction.
*Subsidized project* means a multifamily housing project (with the exception of a project owned by a cooperative housing mortgagor corporation or association) that receives the benefit of subsidy in the form of: below-market interest rates under section 221(d) (3) and (5), interest reduction payments under section 236 of the National Housing Act, or below market interest rate direct loans under section 202 of the Housing Act of 1959. For purposes of this part, *subsidized project* also includes those units in a housing project that receive the benefit of: ( 1 ) Rental subsidy in the form of rent supplement payments under section 101 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1965 (12 U.S.C. 1701s); or
( 2 ) Housing assistance payments for project-based assistance under Section 8 of the 1937 Act (42 U.S.C. 1437f). However, this part is not applicable to Section 8 project-based assistance under parts 880, 881, 883 and 884 of this title (except as specifically provided in those parts).
[41 FR 43330, Sept. 30, 1976. Redesignated at 49 FR 6713, Feb. 23, 1984, and amended at 53 FR 3368, Feb. 5, 1988; 54 FR 236, Jan. 4, 1989; 61 FR 47381, Sept. 6, 1996; 66 FR 28797, May 24, 2001]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES STEVENS,

Petitioner, 

 v.

RON DAVIS, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 9-137 WHA

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING ON

PROCEDURAL DEFAULT ISSUES

The Court is in receipt of petitioner’s Limited Traverse to respondent’s Answer to

petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court notes that respondent raises

allegations of procedural default in the Answer, which petitioner denies in the Traverse. 

Respondent is directed to file any motion based on procedural default defenses by

January 22, 2015. Petitioner’s opposition to any such motion will be due by February 5, 2015,

and the optional reply will be due no later than February 12, 2015.

If respondent does not intend to file a motion based on procedural default defenses, he

shall notify the Court in writing no later than January 12, 2015. A further scheduling order

shall issue at that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5 , 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00137-WHA Document 94 Filed 01/05/15 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**GMH COMMUNITIESTRUST**

**CERTIFICATIONREQUIRED BYRULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

I, J. Patrick O’Grady,acting in the capacity of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof GMH Communities Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”),hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

(1)   The Company’sannual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006(the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

*  *  *
| /s/ J.  PATRICK O’GRADY                            |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| J. Patrick O’Grady                                 |   |   |
| Executive Vice  President and   Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                           |   |   |

 

Date: March 16, 2007

----
Exhibit
      31.1





CERTIFICATION







I,
      Kelly Absher, certify that:





1.  I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
      containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
      included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Select Notes Trust
      LT
      2004-1;





2.  Based
      on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period
      covered by this annual report;





3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be
      provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
      similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
      reports;





4.  I
      am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
      the
      trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement and based upon
      my
      knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
      except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and the trustee have each
      fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.





5.  The
      reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by
      the
      trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based
      upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
      a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
      Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
      similar agreement, that is included in these reports.





In
      giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
      provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National
      Association.





By:  
                /s/ Kelly
                AbsherName: Kelly
                AbsherTitle:   Authorized
                SignatoryStructured
              Obligations CorporationDate:  March
              28,
              2007
### §6835. Federal compliance

#### (a) Procedures

(1) The head of each Federal agency shall adopt procedures necessary to assure that new Federal buildings meet or exceed the Federal building energy standards established under section 6834 of this title.

(2) The Federal building energy standards established under section 6834 of this title shall apply to new buildings under the jurisdiction of the Architect of the Capitol. The Architect shall adopt procedures necessary to assure that such buildings meet or exceed such standards.

#### (b) Construction of new buildings

The head of a Federal agency may expend Federal funds for the construction of a new Federal building only if the building meets or exceeds the appropriate Federal building energy standards established under section 6834 of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title III, §306, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §101(a)(2), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2785.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 6835, Pub. L. 94–385, title III, §306, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1148; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §326(d), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1650; Pub. L. 97–35, title X, §1041(d), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 621, related to compliance with final performance standards by Federal agencies, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §101(a)(2), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2783.
Exhibit
      32.1






Splinex
      Technology Inc.


500
      West
      Cypress Creek Road-Suite 100


Ft.
      Lauderdale, Florida, 33309






July
      14,
      2006




Securities
      and Exchange Commission


100
      F
      Street, NE Washington, DC 20549




Re:
      Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350




Dear
      Ladies and Gentlemen:




In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex
      Technology Inc., for the year ended March 31, 2006, I, Gerard Herlihy, President
      and Chief Financial Officer of Splinex Technology Inc., hereby certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            such
                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex Technology Inc., for the
                year
                ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


2.
            the
                information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Splinex
                Technology Inc., for the year ended March 31, 2006, fairly presents,
                in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of Splinex Technology Inc.




BY:
                  /S/ Gerard Herlihy
                ——————————————
                Gerard
                  Herlihy
                President
                  and Chief Financial Officer
                (Principal
                  Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                  and Duly
                  Authorized Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to Splinex Technology Inc. and
      will be retained by Splinex Technology Inc. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




In
      accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-B, this certification is
      being “furnished” as Exhibit 32.2 to Splinex Technology Inc.’s quarterly
      report and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the
      liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference
      in
      any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except as
      expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.


51
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

§ 40.35 Participants in Nazi persecutions or genocide. ( a ) *Participation in Nazi persecutions.* [Reserved]
( b ) *Participation in genocide.* [Reserved]
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.

GLUMAC, a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DON TODD ASSOCIATES, INC., an

entity of unknown form, and DOES 1 TO

100, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-01442 WHA

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the order granting in part and denying in part plaintiff’s motion

for default judgment, FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of plaintiff and against

defendants. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 16, 2010 WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-01442-WHA Document 30 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 1
ex10_44.htm









Exhibit 10.44


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT







The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the "Employer") and G. Paul Bozuwa (the "Employee") wish to amend the Employee's Employment and Non-Competition Agreement (the "Employment Agreement"), dated April 1, 2007, to bring the Employment Agreement into compliance with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and other authoritative guidance issued under that section.







WHEREAS, no payments of deferred compensation subject to Code section 409A have been made from the Employee's Employment Agreement (or the prior Employment Agreement between the Employer and the Employee dated June 30, 2001), and the Parties have been in operational compliance with Code section 409A since January 1, 2005.







WHEREAS, pursuant to IRS Notice 2007-86 and the final Treasury Regulations under Code section 409A, the Employment Agreement is being amended to comply with the final Treasury Regulations issued under Code section 409A.







Accordingly, effective April 1, 2007, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:







1.  The second sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6(e)(iv) is amended by deleting the phrase that appears in brackets (i.e., by deleting "[or less than fifty percent (50%), if the Employee becomes an independent contractor]").







2.  Section 10(g) – Arbitration of Disputes – is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of that Section:







"Any reimbursement of reasonable fees and expenses under this Section shall be paid by the Employer to the Employee by the March 15 following the end of the year during which the Employee prevails in the dispute giving rise to such reimbursement."







In all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed, effective as specified herein.








	
ATTEST/WITNESS:

	  	
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	 	/s/ John A. Saxton
	  	  	  	  	  
	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp

	  	
Print Name:

	
John A. Saxton


	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	 	/s/ Dale A. Tepp	 	/s/ G. Paul Bozuwa
	  	  	  	
G. Paul Bozuwa


	
Print Name:

	
Dale A. Tepp
§ 220.823 Claim computation; items deducted. If the lender is to receive payment in cash, there shall be deducted from the total of the added items in § 220.822 the following: ( a ) Any balance of the loan not advanced to the borrower;
( b ) Any cash held by the lender or its agents or to which it is entitled; including deposits made for the account of the borrower and which have not been applied in reduction of the principal obligation under the note and security instrument or instruments.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Watson, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. . No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
**EXHIBIT32.3**

 

**Certification ofChief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)            theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

This written statement is beingfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanyingthis Report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934.

 

 
| Dated: August 3, 2004 | /s/ Bruce Ross          |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Bruce Ross              |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----