alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ MICHAEL J. GREBE Michael J. Grebe
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
March 1, 2011


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew J. McKelvey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/ANDREW J. MCKELVEY                                             
| |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     | Andrew J. McKelvey
      Chief Executive Officer
      May 6, 2005

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Case 3:09-cv-00350-MMC Document 111 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

Dated: August 25,

2010

Case 3:09-cv-00350-MMC Document 111 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-01510-MMC Document 96 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 2
18

Case 3:09-cv-01510-MMC Document 96 Filed 03/18/10 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 17-6972 

LARRY WAYNE SMITH, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:17-cv-00335-GEC-RSB) 

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Larry Wayne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Larry Wayne Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (2012) petition as successive and unauthorized. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When 

the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2532 

To suspend temporarily the duty on urea, polymer with formaldehyde 

(Pergopak). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. CANTOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on urea, polymer with 

formaldehyde (Pergopak). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UREA, POLYMER WITH FORMALDEHYDE 

4 (PERGOPAK). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.10.01 Urea, polymer with formaldehyde (Pergopak) (CAS 

No. 9011–05–6) (provided 

for in subheading 

3909.10.00) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2532 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

Case No. 09-00981 MHP

1

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway

Suite 200

Alameda, CA 94501-1091

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARRY E. HINKLE, Bar No. 071223

PATRICIA A. DAVIS, Bar No. 179074

NICOLE M. PHILLIPS, Bar No. 203786

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 200

Alameda, California 94501-1091

Telephone 510.337.1001

Fax 510.337.1023

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

MICHAEL P. QUINLIVAN, Bar No. 58062

KOUNS, QUINLIVAN & SEVERSON 

Ten Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1250 

San Jose, CA 95113

Telephone 408 278-0125 

Fax 408 292-1257

Attorneys for Defendants 

ALFRED CONRAD JEPSEN and AL-CON 

CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, in their 

capacities as Trustees of the CEMENT 

MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST 

FUND FOR NOTHERN CALIFORNIA, 

CEMENT MASONS PENSION TRUST FUND 

FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, CEMENT 

MASONS VACATION/HOLIDAY TRUST 

FUND FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, 

CEMENT MASONS APPRENTICESHIP AND 

TRAINING TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN 

CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALFRED CONRAD JEPSEN, Individually, 

ALFRED CONRAD JEPSEN Individually and 

doing business as AL-CON CONCRETE 

CONTRACTORS, INC., and AL-CON 

CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, INC., A

California Corporation,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV 09-0981 MHP

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

RETAINED JURISDICTION;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case 3:09-cv-00981-MHP Document 21 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 2
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL

Case No. 09-00981 MHP

2

WEINBERG, ROGER & 

ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

1001 Marina Village Parkway

Suite 200

Alameda, CA 94501-1091

510.337.1001

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS of the written settlement agreement between the 

parties, which resolve all outstanding claims for damages, attorneys fees, litigation expenses and 

costs, and which directs the plaintiffs to request dismissal of the action with prejudice, but to 

request that the District Court retain jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the settlement agreement, 

PLAINTIFF HEREBY REQUESTS that the action be dismissed with prejudice but with 

the Court retaining special jurisdiction for no more than eighteen (18) months to interpret and 

enforce the agreement.

Dated: April 15, 2010

WEINBERG, ROGER & ROSENFELD

A Professional Corporation

By: //s//

 NICOLE M. PHILLIPS

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: April 15, 2010

By: //s//

 MICHAEL P. QUINLIVAN 

Attorneys for Defendants

[PROPOSED ] ORDER

SO ORDERED.

 

___________________________________________.

Dated: ________________ HONORABLE MARILYN PATEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

120667/568258

4/16/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-00981-MHP Document 21 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 134.3 Proceedings covered. ( a ) The Act applies to adversary adjudications conducted by the Department of State. These are adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 in which the position of the Department of State is presented by an attorney or other representative who enters an appearance and participates in the proceeding. For the Department of State, the type of proceeding covered are proceedings relative to controlling export of defense articles through administrative sanctions pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2778 and 50 U.S.C. App. 2410 (c)(2)(B).
( b ) The Department of State may also designate a proceeding not listed in paragraph (a) of this section as an adversary adjudication for purposes of the Act by so stating in an order initiating the proceeding or designating the matter for hearing. The failure to designate a proceeding as an adversary adjudication shall not preclude the filing of an application by a party who believes the proceeding is covered by the Act; whether the proceeding is covered will then be an issue for resolution in proceedings on the application.
( c ) If a proceeding includes matters covered by the Act and matters specifically excluded from coverage, any award made will include only fees and expenses related to covered issues.
§ 203.281 Calculation of one-time MIP. ( a ) The applicable premium percentage determined under paragraph (b) of this section assumes, for purposes of calculation, that the entire amount of the one-time MIP is added to the loan amount. The amount of the one-time MIP shall be determined by multiplying the loan amount otherwise insurable under this part by the applicable premium percentage, subject to adjustment for the portion of the MIP, if any, that is not to be included in the insured mortgage.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Commissioner shall determine the applicable premium percentage in accordance with sound financial and actuarial practice.
( 2 ) Application of the premium percentage determined under paragraph (b)(1) of this section shall not result in a MIP in excess of an amount equivalent to 1 per centum per annum of the amount of the principal obligation of the mortgage outstanding at any time, without taking into account delinquent payments or prepayments.
( c ) The applicable premium percentage will be published by notice at least annually in the Federal Register.
[48 FR 28806, June 23, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 36265, July 9, 1996]
**EXHIBIT
      99.5**





**CONSENT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS**





We
      hereby consent
      to the use of and reference to our name and our reports, and the inclusion
      of
      information derived from our reports, evaluating Vermilion Energy Trust's
      petroleum and natural gas reserves as at December 31, 2005, in this Annual
      Report on Form 40-F of Vermilion Energy Trust.





Yours
      very
      truly,





** ***(“GLJ
      Petroleum Consultants Ltd.”)***





GLJ
      Petroleum
      Consultants Ltd.


4100,
      400 - 3rd
      Avenue S.W.,


Calgary,
      Alberta,
      Canada T2P 4H2


(403)
      266-9500 Fax
      (403) 262-1855





Dated:
      February 21,
      2006


Calgary,
      Alberta
#### § 14.340 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final departmental decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL AND CHANGE OF LEAD COUNSEL 

Case No. C-09-1360 MMC 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jimmy M. Shin (California State Bar No. 200161) 

jshin@sonnenschein.com

Jennifer Bennett (California State Bar No. 235196) 

jbennett@sonnenschein.com 

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP 

1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200 

Palo Alto, CA 94304 

Telephone: (650) 798-0300 

Facsimile: (650) 798-0310 

Attorneys for Defendant 

KINETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

ADVANCED ANALOGIC 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

KINETIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Defendant. 

No. C-09-1360 MMC 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL AND 

CHANGE OF LEAD COUNSEL 

The request of Kinetic Technologies, Inc. (“Kinetic”) for withdrawal of attorney Yar R. 

Chaikovsky, formerly of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP (“Sonnenschein”), as counsel for 

Kinetic and the substitution of Jimmy M. Shin of Sonnenschein as its lead counsel in the aboveentitled action is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: __________________ 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 

United States District Judge 

14842351\V-3

February 25, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-01360-MMC Document 78 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 96.52 Performance of Convention communication and coordination functions in incoming cases. ( a ) The agency or person keeps the Central Authority of the foreign country and the Secretary informed as necessary about the adoption process and the measures taken to complete it, as well as about the progress of the placement if a probationary period is required.
( b ) The agency or person takes all appropriate measures, consistent with the procedures of the U.S. Central Authority and of the foreign country, to: ( 1 ) Transmit on a timely basis the home study to the Central Authority or other competent authority of the child's country of origin;
( 2 ) Obtain the child background study, proof that the necessary consents to the child's adoption have been obtained, and the necessary determination that the prospective placement is in the child's best interests, from the Central Authority or other competent authority in the child's country of origin;
( 3 ) Provide confirmation that the prospective adoptive parent(s) agree to the adoption to the Central Authority or other competent authority in the child's country of origin; and
( 4 ) Transmit the determination that the child is or will be authorized to enter and reside permanently in the United States to the Central Authority or other competent authority in the child's country of origin.
( c ) The agency or person takes all necessary and appropriate measures, consistent with the procedures of the foreign country, to obtain permission for the child to leave his or her country of origin and to enter and reside permanently in the United States.
( d ) Where the transfer of the child does not take place, the agency or person returns the home study on the prospective adoptive parent(s) and/or the child background study to the authorities that forwarded them.
( e ) The agency or person takes all necessary and appropriate measures to perform any tasks in an intercountry adoption case that the Secretary identifies are required to comply with the Convention, the IAA, the UAA, or any regulations implementing the IAA or UAA.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40635, July 14, 2014]
§ 203.360 Notice of property transfer or pre-foreclosure sale and application for insurance benefits. ( a ) On the date the deed is filed for record the mortgagee shall notify the Commissioner on a form prescribed by him of the filing of such conveyance and shall assign, without recourse or warranty any or all claims which the mortgagee has acquired in connection with the mortgage transaction, and as a result of the foreclosure proceedings or other means by which the mortgagee acquired or conveyed such property, except such claims as may have been released with the approval of the Commissioner.
( b ) Within 30 days of the closing of an approved pre-foreclosure sale, the mortgagee shall notify the Commissioner on a form prescribed by him of the pre-foreclosure sale.
[36 FR 24508, Dec. 22, 1971, as amended at 59 FR 50144, Sept. 30, 1994]
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

August 6, 2007

Mr. Marty Albertson

Dear Marty:

I am writing with reference to the Second Amended andRestated Employment Agreement (as amended, the “Agreement”), dated as of October 8,2004, between you and Guitar Center, Inc. (the “Company”). Section 4(f)(ii) ofthe Agreement provides that for fiscal 2007 the Company’s obligations under Section 4(f) togrant an annual equity incentive to you shall be satisfied by granting to youoptions to purchase 32,000 shares of the common stock of the Company. It is ourunderstanding that you have agreed to waive the Company’s obligation to grantthe 2007 options. Please confirm that our understanding is correct by signingthis letter in the space indicated below.

Bestregards,
| GUITAR  CENTER, INC.                         |     |
|----------------------------------------------|----------|
| */s/*LELAND P. SMITH                         | * * |
| Leland P. Smith                              |     |
| ***Executive Vice President of  Corporate*** |     |
| ***Development and General Counsel***        |     |
| *Confirmed:*                                 | * * |
| */s/*MARTY ALBERTSON                         | * * |
| *Marty Albertson*                            | * * |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Road Material Corporation, Petitioner, v Commissioner of the Environmental Conservation Department of the State of New York, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated April 22, 1976 and made after a hearing, which denied petitioner’s application for a moratorium permit. Determination confirmed, without costs or disbursements, and, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties at oral argument, the proceeding is converted into an action to declare the rights of the parties with respect to the first branch of the relief sought in the petition and, as such, the action is remanded to Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. The time within which plaintiff, heretofore the petitioner, may serve its complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
### §7382a. Purpose; designation

#### (a) Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to establish within the Department of Energy a national fellowship program for elementary and secondary school mathematics and science teachers.

#### (b) Designation

A recipient of a fellowship under this subchapter shall be known as an "Albert Einstein Fellow".

(Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §513, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4042.)
Ambient Air Quality Monitors for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Recording Preliminary Violations* of the 2010 Primary SO 2 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) as of March 18, 2015 *A violation occurs when the validated “design value” for SO 2 monitoring data collected in calendar years 2012
- 2014 exceeds 75 parts per billion (ppb) . Note that the 2012

– 2014 design values listed below are preliminary and are based on data that are not yet complete for 2014. Data for the 4 th Quarter of 2014 is due to be submitted to the EPA by March 31, 2015. Final 2012
- 2014 design v alues will be publ ished after the 2014 data is certified on May 1, 2015. Final 2012
- 2014 design v alues may change fr om these preliminary 2012
- 2014 design v alues, including decreasing to a level that would not constitute a violation.

State County Air Quality Systems Monitor Identification Number Monitor Location 2012

– 2014 Preliminary SO 2 Design Value (ppb) GA Chatham 13

- 051

- 1002 Pumping Station: Intersection of W. Lathrop and August Ave; Savannah, GA 31415 78
HI Hawaii 15

- 001

- 0005 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park 1196 HI Hawaii 15

- 001

- 0007 Hawaii Volcanoes National Park 1403 HI Hawaii 15

- 001

- 1006 1099 Waianuenue Avenue; Hilo, HI 175 HI Hawaii 15

- 001

- 2016 96

- 3150 Pikake St; Pahala, HI 712 HI Hawaii 15

- 001

- 2020 Orchid Parkway, Hawaiian Ocean View Estates; Ocean View, HI 553
HI Hawaii 15

- 001

- 2023 18

- 1235 Volcano Rd; Mountain View, HI 240 MO Iron 29

- 093

- 0034 347 Power Lane ; Bixby, MO 65439 76 ND Williams 38

- 105

- 0105 Amerada Hess #3 202 WI Brown 55

- 009

- 0005 East High, 1415 E. Walnut Green Bay, WI 54301 76
WY Carbon 56

- 007

- 0852 Sinclair SO 2 Station 123
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

APPROVED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:09-cv-00252-SI Document 25 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-00252-SI Document 25 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76457-76458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[FE Docket No. 04-121-NG]


Office of Fossil Energy; Cascade Natural Gas Corporation; Order 
Granting Authority To Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) gives notice that it issued 
DOE/FE Order No. 2051 granting Cascade Natural Gas Corporation 
authority to import up to .5 billion cubic feet of natural gas annually 
from Canada, over a term of five years that began on November 1, 2004. 
The natural gas will be imported under a Base Contract for Sale and 
Purchase of Natural Gas with IGI Resources, Inc.
    This Order may be found on the FE Web site at http://www.fe.doe.gov 
(select gas regulation). It is also available for inspection and 
copying in the Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Docket Room, 
3E-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20585-0334, (202) 586-9478. The Docket Room is open from 8 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.


[[Page 76458]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, December 9, 2004.
R.F. Corbin,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulatory Activities, Office of Global Supply and 
Security, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 04-27866 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P