alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 207.252b Premiums—mortgages insured pursuant to section 223(f) of the Act. ( a ) The mortgagee, upon the initial-final endorsement of the mortgage for insurance pursuant to a Commitment to Insure Upon Completion issued in accordance with § 207.32a, shall pay to the Commissioner a first mortgage insurance premium equal to one percent of the original face amount of the mortgage.
( b ) The mortgagee, on the date of the first principal payment, shall pay a second premium equal to one percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage for the year following such first principal payment date which shall be adjusted as of that date so that the aggregate of the first and second premiums shall equal the sum of one percent per annum of the average outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage for the period from the date of the insurance endorsement to one year following the date of the first principal payment.
( c ) The provisions of paragraphs (d), (e) and (f) of § 207.252 shall apply to mortgages insured pursuant to section 223(f) of the Act.
[40 FR 10177, Mar. 5, 1975]
### §7609. Policy review

#### (a) Environmental impact

The Administrator shall review and comment in writing on the environmental impact of any matter relating to duties and responsibilities granted pursuant to this chapter or other provisions of the authority of the Administrator, contained in any (1) legislation proposed by any Federal department or agency, (2) newly authorized Federal projects for construction and any major Federal agency action (other than a project for construction) to which section 4332(2)(C) of this title applies, and (3) proposed regulations published by any department or agency of the Federal Government. Such written comment shall be made public at the conclusion of any such review.

#### (b) Unsatisfactory legislation, action, or regulation

In the event the Administrator determines that any such legislation, action, or regulation is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of public health or welfare or environmental quality, he shall publish his determination and the matter shall be referred to the Council on Environmental Quality.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §309, as added Pub. L. 91–604, §12(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1709.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1857h–7 of this title.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 309 of act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, formerly §13, as added Dec. 17, 1963, Pub. L. 88–206, §1, 77 Stat. 401; renumbered §306, Oct. 20, 1965, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(4), 79 Stat. 992; renumbered §309, Nov. 21, 1967, Pub. L. 90–148, §2, 81 Stat. 506; renumbered §316, Dec. 31, 1970, Pub. L. 91–604, §12(a), 84 Stat. 1705, related to appropriations and was classified to section 1857l of this title, prior to repeal by section 306 of Pub. L. 95–95. See section 7626 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Modification or Rescission of Rules, Regulations, Orders, Determinations, Contracts, Certifications, Authorizations, Delegations, and Other Actions

All rules, regulations, orders, determinations, contracts, certifications, authorizations, delegations, or other actions duly issued, made, or taken by or pursuant to act July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of Pub. L. 95–95 [Aug. 7, 1977] to continue in full force and effect until modified or rescinded in accordance with act July 14, 1955, as amended by Pub. L. 95–95 [this chapter], see section 406(b) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 1 345 LT Case No. 20 23

- C A

- 114

_____________________________
N AZARIO V AZQUEZ , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Sumter County

. Michelle T. Morley , Judge

. Nazario Vazquez
, Bushnell , pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee

.

Octob er 24, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

H ARRIS , S OUD , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
### §4959. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–13, title II, §2104, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1583

Section, Pub. L. 93–113, title I, §109, as added Pub. L. 99–551, §4(a), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3072; amended Pub. L. 101–204, title VI, §601, Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1819; Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §327, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title VIII, §405(d)(36)(B), (f)(28)(B)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–427, 2681–434, related to the VISTA Literacy Corps.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
JUN O 2022 

EyzAR

. 

 ;F. .A.

..BROwN 

9 

CLERK 

J. 

Cadish Pickering 

Silver 

• 

, J. Pick. , J 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ALEX PENLY, 

Appellant, 

VS. 

MILTON J. WOODS; AND CIRRUS 

AVIATION SERVICES INC., A 

WASHINGTON CORPORATION, 

Res • ondents. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

No. 84710 

- FILED 

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying motion to strike 

affidavits of renewal of judgment and untimely reply in support of affidavit. 

Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nancy L. Allf, Judge. 

Initial review of the notice of appeal and the documents before 

this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court "may only consider 

appeals authorized by statute or court rule." Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 

LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule 

allows for an appeal from the district court's order identified in appellant's 

notice of appeal. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

--I 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 
cc: Hon. Nancy L. Allf, District Judge 

Alex Penly 

Fox Rothschild, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

( o ) I 947A 

2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of ERF
Wireless, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned R. Greg Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of ERF Wireless, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 26, 2005


By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     -----------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
     and Accounting Officer)
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

San Francisco Division

CHRISTINA ADAMS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

ZELDA’S RESTAURANT, et al., 

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-1275 JCS MED

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

DEFENDANT RICHARD BREGANTE

AND INSURANCE ADJUSTER

CAROLYN KANG NOT TO ATTEND

THE MEDIATION SESSION

Date: April 16, 2010

Mediator: Gail Killefer

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the requests for defendant Richard Bregante and insurance

adjuster Carolyn Kang not to appear at the April 16, 2010 mediation before Gail Killefer are

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

March 18, 2010 By:

Dated Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01275-JCS Document 20 Filed 03/18/10 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George Henry, v. Trial Term, Part III (Criminal Branch) of the Supreme Court, in and for the County of Erie, etc.

Application for writ of prohibition denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

DEBORAH R. DOUGLAS (NYBN 2099372)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200 

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: deborah.r.douglas@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

URSULA NGOZI OGAMBA, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR09-00776 DLJ

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER

THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. §

3161 ET SEQ.

On June 2, 2010, the defendant Ursula Ngozi Ogamba was arrested and initially presented

before the Court. The matter was continued to June 4, 2010 for appointment of counsel and

arraignment, and to June 7, 2010 for a bail review hearing. For the reasons stated in open court

on June 2, 2010, the Court excluded time under the Speedy Trial Act from June 2, 2010 to June 7,

2010 to enable effective defense preparation and continuity of counsel. The Court found that (A)

failure to grant the continuance would unreasonably deny defendant the reasonable time necessary

for effective preparation and continuity of counsel, taking into account the exercise of due

Case 3:09-cr-00776-CRB Document 8 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

diligence; and (B) the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of

the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 4 , 2010 ____________________________________

HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU

United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Donna M. Ryu

Case 3:09-cr-00776-CRB Document 8 Filed 06/04/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 231.06 Transferability of Guarantee; Note Register.

A Noteholder may assign, transfer or pledge an Eligible Note to any Person. Any such assignment, transfer or pledge shall be effective on the date that the name of the new Noteholder is entered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement. USAID shall be entitled to treat the Persons in whose names the Eligible Notes are registered as the owners thereof for all purposes of this Guarantee and USAID shall not be affected by notice to the contrary.
### §4770. Limitations on availability of funds for cost sharing

Federal funds made available to State or local governments under other programs may not be used by the State or local government for cost-sharing purposes under grant provisions of this chapter, except that Federal funds of a program financed wholly by Federal funds may be used to pay a pro-rata share of such cost sharing. State or local government funds used for cost sharing on other federally assisted programs may not be used for cost sharing under grant provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title V, §511, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1928.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, means the provisions of subchapters I, II, III, and IV of this chapter. See section 4761 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2700 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2700

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 7-[(5-
  chloro-2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[ (4-methoxy-2-
                    sulfophenyl)azo]-, sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 7-[(5-
  chloro-2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[ (4-methoxy-2-
                    sulfophenyl)azo]-, sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-NAPHTHALENESULFONIC ACID, 7-[(5-CHLORO-2,6-DIFLUORO-4-
              PYRIMIDINYL)AMINO]-4-HYDROXY-3-[(4-METHOXY-2-
              SULFOPHENYL)AZO]-, SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.04      2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Naphthalenesulfon                                                  31/2008
                         ic acid, 7-[(5-
                         chloro-2,6-
                         difluoro-4-
                         pyrimidinyl)amino
                         ]-4-hydroxy-3-[(4-
                         methoxy-2-
                         sulfophenyl)azo]-
                         , sodium salt.
                         (CAS No. 85391-83-
                         9) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3204.16.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Howe Sound Company v. Greg-Gary Corporation. (Two Actions.)

) Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### § 203.35 Disclosure and verification of Social Security and Employer Identification Numbers.

To be eligible for mortgage insurance under this part, the mortgagor must meet the requirements for the disclosure and verification of Social Security and Employer Identification Numbers, as provided by part 200, subpart U, of this chapter.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 2502-0059, 2502-0159, and 2502-0268)

[54 FR 39693, Sept. 27, 1989]
Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Adhesives and Sealants 9.55E-02 0.02 0.02

Cement, Hydraulic (not subject to Portland Cement MACT) 9.85E-02 0.02 0.05

Chemicals and Allied Products, nec 3.52E-01 0.09 0.14

Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production [1] 1.40E+00 0.35 0.49

Hydrochloric Acid Production 1.81E-01 0.05 0.53

Industrial Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 3.60E-01 0.09 0.62

Industrial Organic Chemicals Manufacturing 1.08E+00 0.27 0.89

Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 1.91E+00 0.48 1.37

Municipal Landfills 3.14E+00 0.78 2.15

Nonmetallic Mineral Products Manufacturing 2.50E-03 0.00 2.15

Paper And Allied Products 9.50E+00 2.37 4.52

Paper Mills (not subject to Pulp and Paper MACT) 1.34E+01 3.34 7.86

Pharmaceuticals Production 1.15E+01 2.87 10.72

Plastic Parts and Products (Surface Coating) 3.25E+00 0.81 11.53

Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) 3.52E+02 87.85 99.38

Secondary Lead Smelting 2.02E-02 0.01 99.39

Sewage Sludge Incineration 1.32E+00 0.33 99.71

Space Research and Technology 2.50E-03 0.00 99.71

Tire Production 6.72E-02 0.02 99.73

Unsupported Plastics Film & Sheet 1.08E+00 0.27 100.00

Total Emissions 400.87 100.00

Foot Notes

[1] Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production was titled Cyclic 

Crude and Intermediate Production (not subject to petroleum 

refining MACT) in the May 1999 Report

Chloroform
### §7671n. Authority of Administrator

If, in the Administrator's judgment, any substance, practice, process, or activity may reasonably be anticipated to affect the stratosphere, especially ozone in the stratosphere, and such effect may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, the Administrator shall promptly promulgate regulations respecting the control of such substance, practice, process, or activity, and shall submit notice of the proposal and promulgation of such regulation to the Congress.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title VI, §615, as added Pub. L. 101–549, title VI, §602(a), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2669.)
Case 3:09-cv-00440-EMC Document 66 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-00440-EMC Document 66 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 3
18

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-00440-EMC Document 66 Filed 06/21/10 Page 3 of 3
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Chief Counsel

HAND-CARRIED AND BY FAX (202) 493-5142 September 14,2015 Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Suite 2W1 000 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Enforcement Division, AGC-300 BOO Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 

# RECEIVED SEP 1 52015 

## HEARING DOCKET

Re: Inthe Matter ofRegent Aerospace Corporation, DocketNos, FAA-2013- 0851 and 2013-0952

Dear Sir or Madam: Respondent, through its counsel, Jeffrey Clement, has agreed to a 14-day extension of time for the FAA to file its appealbriefin the above-referenced case, The appeal brief, which is currently due on September 21,2015, will be due on October 5, 2015. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.233(c)(1), the FAA requests that the FAA Decisionmaker grant the extension oftime. Sincerely,**~'** 1 

## 1

. ' '**~-** Susan S. Caron Manager, Appellate Practice Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Tele: (202) 267-7721 Fax: (202) 267-5106 Susan.caron@faa.gov

cc: Jeffrey Clement, Esq. HoffLaw Group Suite 330 135 S. LaSalle Street Chicago, IL 60603-4134 Fax: (312) 853-3924
#### § 241.15 Notice.

Any communication to USAID pursuant to this Guarantee shall be in writing in the English language, shall refer to the Republic of Iraq Loan Guarantee Number inscribed on the Eligible Note and shall be complete on the day it shall be actually received by USAID at the Office of Development Credit, Bureau for Economic Growth, Education and Environment, United States Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523-0030. Other addresses may be substituted for the above upon the giving of notice of such substitution to each Noteholder by first class mail at the address set forth in the Note Register.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification Pursuant To  Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I,
Michael J. Grebe, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Interline Brands, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 1, 2011

By:

/s/ MICHAEL J. GREBEName:

Michael J. GrebeTitle:

Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6662

CHRISTOPHER GAYTON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER KUSTANBAUER, Correctional Officer; OFFICER PHILLIPS, 

Correctional Officer; UNKNOWN ESCORTING OFFICER #2, Correctional 

Officer; K. LAYBOURNE, Dr., Medical Administrator; OFFICER KULFMAN, 

Correctional Officer; UNKNOWN ESCORTING OFFICER #1, Correctional 

Officer,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01577-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: November 16, 2017 Decided: November 20, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Gayton, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Gayton appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint. 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Gayton v. Kustanbauer, No. 1:16-cv-01577-LMBMSN (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2017; filed Apr. 11, 2017, entered Apr. 12, 2017). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED