alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,246
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,231,801
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          94,282
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            94,975
<LOANS>                                      1,307,644
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,719,166
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,045,777
<SHORT-TERM>                                   298,901
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             87,611
<LONG-TERM>                                    695,017
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           436
<OTHER-SE>                                     591,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,719,166
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 70,503
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              122,628
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,199
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               194,330
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              72,825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,937
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           75,393
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,944
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 32,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,961
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      56,961
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,964
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.09
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,591
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    565
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,029
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,779
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         24,779
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2





Report Of Independent


Registered Public Accounting Firm




To the Board of Directors


Structured Obligations Corporation


New York, New York




We have examined the compliance of Structured Obligations Corporation (Depositor) and U.S. Bank National Association (Trustee) with the Base Trust Agreement and the Select Notes Trust Supplement LT 2004-1 (the Agreements) relating to the administration of the underlying securities and related credit support deposited in or held by the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1 for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Depositor’s management is responsible for compliance with those requirements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance with the Agreements based on our examination.




Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with those requirements described above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a legal determination of Depositor’s and Trustee’s compliance with specified requirements.




In our opinion, Depositor and Trustee complied, in all material respects, with the requirements described above of the Agreements for the year ended December 31, 2012.




This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Depositor, the Trustee, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Certificate Holders of the Select Notes Trust LT 2004-1, and is not intended to be, and should not be used by anyone other than those specified parties.




/s/ RubinBrown LLP
 
 
 Overland Park, Kansas
 March 8, 2013
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–487 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 2082) TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

FISCAL YEAR 2008 FOR INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED 

ACTIVITIES OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, THE COMMUNITY 

MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT, AND THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY 

RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 11, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 859] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 859, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the conference report 

to accompany H.R. 2082, the ‘‘Intelligence Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008.’’ The rule waives all points of order against the 

conference report and its consideration. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 9 of rule 

XXII (precluding conferees from including matter outside the scope 

of conference). Although the rule waives all points of order against 

the conference report and against its consideration, the conference 

report does not violate either clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI (requiring 

earmarks to be disclosed and requiring conference reports to be in 

compliance with the paygo rule). 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
§ 96.9 Agreement between the Secretary and the accrediting entity. An accrediting entity must perform its functions pursuant to a written agreement with the Secretary that will be published in the Federal Register. The agreement will address: ( a ) The responsibilities and duties of the accrediting entity;
( b ) The method by which the costs of delivering the accreditation or approval services may be recovered through the collection of fees from those seeking accreditation or approval, and how the entity's schedule of fees will be approved;
( c ) How the accrediting entity will address complaints about accredited agencies and approved persons (including their use of supervised providers) and complaints about the accrediting entity itself;
( d ) Data collection requirements;
( e ) Matters of communication and accountability between both the accrediting entity and the applicant(s) and between the accrediting entity and the Secretary; and
( f ) Other matters upon which the parties have agreed.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40633, July 14, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 41
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 41 appear at 71 FR 34521 and 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 41.11 Entitlement to nonimmigrant status. ( a ) *Presumption of immigrant status and burden of proof.* An applicant for a nonimmigrant visa, other than an alien applying for a visa under INA 101(a)(15) (H)(i) or (L), shall be presumed to be an immigrant until the consular officer is satisfied that the alien is entitled to a nonimmigrant status described in INA 101(a)(15) or otherwise established by law or treaty. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to establish entitlement for nonimmigrant status and the type of nonimmigrant visa for which application is made.
( b ) *Aliens unable to establish nonimmigrant status.* ( 1 ) A nonimmigrant visa shall not be issued to an alien who has failed to overcome the presumption of immigrant status established by INA 214(b).
( 2 ) In a borderline case in which an alien appears to be otherwise entitled to receive a visa under INA 101(a)(15)(B) or (F) but the consular officer concludes that the maintenance of the alien's status or the departure of the alien from the United States as required is not fully assured, a visa may nevertheless be issued upon the posting of a bond with the Secretary of Homeland Security under terms and conditions prescribed by the consular officer.
[52 FR 42597, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 1835, Jan. 24, 1996; 85 FR 74882, Nov. 24, 2020]
#### § 1000.546 Are audit costs eligible program or administrative expenses?

Yes, audit costs are an eligible program or administrative expense. If the Indian tribe is the recipient then program funds can be used to pay a prorated share of the tribal audit or financial review cost that is attributable to NAHASDA funded activities. For a recipient not covered by the Single Audit Act, but which chooses to obtain a periodic financial review, the cost of such a review would be an eligible program expense.
### §4368. Grants to qualified citizens groups

(1) There is authorized to be appropriated to the Environmental Protection Agency, for grants to qualified citizens groups in States and regions, $3,000,000.

(2) Grants under this section may be made for the purpose of supporting and encouraging participation by qualified citizens groups in determining how scientific, technological, and social trends and changes affect the future environment and quality of life of an area, and for setting goals and identifying measures for improvement.

(3) The term "qualified citizens group" shall mean a nonprofit organization of citizens having an area based focus, which is not single-issue oriented and which can demonstrate a prior record of interest and involvement in goal-setting and research concerned with improving the quality of life, including plans to identify, protect and enhance significant natural and cultural resources and the environment.

(4) A citizens group shall be eligible for assistance only if certified by the Governor in consultation with the State legislature as a bonafide organization entitled to receive Federal assistance to pursue the aims of this program. The group shall further demonstrate its capacity to employ usefully the funds for the purposes of this program and its broad-based representative nature.

(5) After an initial application for assistance under this section has been approved, the Administrator may make grants on an annual basis, on condition that the Governor recertify the group and that the applicant submits to the Administrator annually—

(A) an evaluation of the progress made during the previous year in meeting the objectives for which the grant was made;

(B) a description of any changes in the objectives of the activities; and

(C) a description of the proposed activities for the succeeding one year period.

(6) A grant made under this program shall not exceed 75 per centum of the estimated cost of the project or program for which the grant is made, and no group shall receive more than $50,000 in any one year.

(7) No financial assistance provided under this section shall be used to support lobbying or litigation by any recipient group.

(Pub. L. 95–477, §3(d), Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1509.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This section, referred to in par. (5), means section 3 of Pub. L. 95–477, in its entirety, subsec. (d) of which enacted this section, subsecs. (a) and (b) of which were not classified to the Code, and subsec. (c) of which is set out as a note under section 4366 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1979, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.
80
: |
13
|
2 |.
66. Je lea 63 62 61 60
Public lands that may have ie) 5 10 20 30 40 50
Ha otentia for disposal or transfer —=_ —— a Map 2-28
ilometers 2 .
0 25 5 10 15 20 25 Potential Disposals -
Miles Laramie County

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

Alternatives 2 & 4
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2767 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on n ethyl N (3-sulfobenzyl) 

aniline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on n ethyl 

N (3-sulfobenzyl) aniline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. N ETHYL N (3-SULFOBENZYL) ANILINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.68 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 n ethyl N (3-sulfobenzyl) aniline) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2767 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 201.83 No waiver of alternative rights or remedies by USAID.

No right reserved to USAID in this subpart to seek a refund from a borrower/grantee, and no exercise of such right, whether or not successful, shall in any way limit or affect, under the doctrine of the election of remedies or otherwise, USAID's rights against a supplier under this subpart I or under the laws of the United States, or of any other country or political subdivision thereof, nor shall any right or remedy herein reserved to USAID against a supplier in any way derogate from or otherwise limit any other rights or remedies which may accrue to USAID under such laws.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Dismissing Complaint and Vacating Status Date

3-08-70515 BZ

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CSBN163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

ELISE BECKER (NYSBN 2540730)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-6878

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

Email: elise.becker@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRIHANNALA MORGAN,

NYENDAK WANGDEN.

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3-08-70515 BZ

MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

DISMISS COMPLAINT and (PROPOSED)

ORDER VACATING STATUS DATE

With leave of the Court, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), the

United States Attorney for the Northern District of California moves to dismiss the above

criminal complaint with prejudice. The defendants completed their eighteen (18) months of

pretrial diversion on March 24, 2010. Accordingly, the government moves to dismiss the

criminal complaint. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:08-mj-70515-MAG Document 22 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Dismissing Complaint and Vacating Status Date

3-08-70515 BZ

DATED: March 26, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

/s/ ________________________________

Elise Becker

Assistant United States Attorney

The Court hereby grants leave to dismiss the above complaint with prejudice and the status

appearance of April 1, 2010, is vacated.

Dated: 

BERNARD ZIMMERMAN

United States Magistrate Judge

March 29, 2010

Case 3:08-mj-70515-MAG Document 22 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

QUAYSHUN ADDNUS DONTE LEWIS, )

DOC #Y50140, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-885

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Joseph C. Fuller, Jr., Judge.

Robert P. Harris, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
### §7709. Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee

#### (a) Establishment

The Director of the United States Geological Survey shall establish a Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee.

#### (b) Organization

The Director shall establish procedures for selection of individuals not employed by the Federal Government who are qualified in the seismic sciences and other appropriate fields and may, pursuant to such procedures, select up to 10 individuals, one of whom shall be designated Chairman, to serve on the Advisory Committee. Selection of individuals for the Advisory Committee shall be based solely on established records of distinguished service, and the Director shall ensure that a reasonable cross-section of views and expertise is represented. In selecting individuals to serve on the Advisory Committee, the Director shall seek and give due consideration to recommendations from the National Academy of Sciences, professional societies, and other appropriate organizations.

#### (c) Meetings

The Advisory Committee shall meet at such times and places as may be designated by the Chairman in consultation with the Director.

#### (d) Duties

The Advisory Committee shall advise the Director on matters relating to the United States Geological Survey's participation in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, including the United States Geological Survey's roles, goals, and objectives within that Program, its capabilities and research needs, guidance on achieving major objectives, and establishing and measuring performance goals. The Advisory Committee shall issue an annual report to the Director for submission to Congress on or before September 30 of each year. The report shall describe the Advisory Committee's activities and address policy issues or matters that affect the United States Geological Survey's participation in the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.

(Pub. L. 106–503, title II, §210, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2308.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Authorization Act of 2000, and not as part of the Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act of 1977 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Advisory Committees

Advisory committees established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless, in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Case 3:09-cv-00145-VRW Document 24 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-00145-VRW Document 24 Filed 01/12/10 Page 2 of 3
January 12, 2010 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cv-00145-VRW Document 24 Filed 01/12/10 Page 3 of 3
### §300ff–82. Audits

#### (a) In general

For fiscal year 2009, and each subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary may reduce the amounts of grants under this subchapter to a State or political subdivision of a State for a fiscal year if, with respect to such grants for the second preceding fiscal year, the State or subdivision fails to prepare audits in accordance with the procedures of section 7502 of title 31. The Secretary shall annually select representative samples of such audits, prepare summaries of the selected audits, and submit the summaries to the Congress.

#### (b) Posting on the Internet

All audits that the Secretary receives from the State lead agency under section 300ff–27(b)(4) of this title shall be posted, in their entirety, on the Internet website of the Health Resources and Services Administration.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2682, as added and amended Pub. L. 109–415, title V, §501, title VII, §703, Dec. 19, 2006, 120 Stat. 2813, 2820; Pub. L. 111–87, §2(a)(1), (3)(A), Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2885.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 300ff–82, July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2682, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title IV, §411(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 623, related to routine notifications with respect to airborne infectious diseases in victims assisted, prior to the general amendment of this part by Pub. L. 109–415.

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–87 repealed Pub. L. 109–415, §703, and revived the provisions of this section as in effect on Sept. 30, 2009. See 2006 Amendment note and Effective Date of 2009 Amendment; Revival of Section note below.

2006—Pub. L. 109–415, §703, which directed repeal of this section effective Oct. 1, 2009, was itself repealed by Pub. L. 111–87, §2(a)(1), effective Sept. 30, 2009.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2009 Amendment; Revival of Section

For provisions that repeal by section 2(a)(1) of Pub. L. 111–87 of section 703 of Pub. L. 109–415 be effective Sept. 30, 2009, and that the provisions of this section as in effect on Sept. 30, 2009, be revived, see section 2(a)(2), (3)(A) of Pub. L. 111–87, set out as a note under section 300ff–11 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.106 Projects with limited distribution mortgagors and program assistance. ( a ) *Regulation as limited distribution mortgagors.* In addition to regulation under § 200.105, limited distribution mortgagors for projects receiving “assistance within the jurisdiction of the Department” (as defined in § 4.3 of this title) may be regulated by the Commissioner as to additional matters, by regulation or otherwise, including as to the amount of the permissible distribution to the mortgagor.
( b ) *Increased distributions.* The Commissioner may permit increased distributions of surplus cash, in excess of the amounts the Commissioner otherwise permits for limited distribution mortgagors, to a limited distribution mortgagor who participates in a HUD-approved initiative or program to preserve housing stock with below-market rents as affordable housing. The increased distribution will be limited to a maximum amount based on market rents and calculated according to HUD instructions. Funds that the mortgagor is authorized to retain under section 236(g)(2) of the National Housing Act are not considered distributions to the mortgagor.
( c ) *Pre-emption.* Any State or local law or regulation that restricts distributions to an amount lower than permitted by the Commissioner under authority of this section is preempted to the extent provided in section 524(f) of the Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997.
[65 FR 61074, Oct. 13, 2000]
Case 3:09-cv-01094-TEH Document 35 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 1 Case3:09-cv-01094-TEH Document34 Filed02/02/10 Page1 of 1