1

 A description of the Chairman's Mark may be found in Joint Committee on Taxation,

Description of the Chairman's Mark of the "Retirement Security and Savings Act of 2000" (JCX89-00), September 5, 2000.

2

 This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, Description of

Modifications to the Chairman's Mark of the "Retirement Security and Savings Act of 2000"

(JCX-92-00), September 7, 2000.

-1-

Joint Committee on Taxation

September 7, 2000

JCX-92-00

DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION TO THE CHAIRMAN'S MARK 

OF THE "RETIREMENT SECURITY AND SAVINGS ACT OF 2000"

The Senate Committee on Finance has scheduled a markup of a Chairman's Mark of the

"Retirement Security and Savings Act of 2000"1 on September 7, 2000. This document, prepared

by the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation, contains a description of a modification to the

Chairman's Mark.2

The modification to the Chairman's Mark would substitute for the provisions of H.R.

1102, as passed by the House of Representatives on July 19, 2000, the provisions of the

Chairman's Mark, modified as described below. H.R. 1102, as modified by the Chairman's Mark

and this modification, would provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 104(a)(2) of the

concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2001.

I. MODIFICATIONS TO PROVISIONS IN THE CHAIRMAN'S MARK

Individual retirement arrangements

The provisions in the Chairman's Mark relating to individual retirement arrangements

("IRAs") would be modified by adding a provision eliminating the marriage penalty in

conversions of Roth IRAs to traditional IRAs. Under the modification, the income limit for such

conversions would be $200,000 for married taxpayers and $100,000 for all other taxpayers

(including married taxpayers filing a separate return). This proposal would be effective for

taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000. 

Credit for low- and middle-income savers

The provision in the Chairman's Mark providing a tax credit for low- and middle-income
-2-

taxpayers would be modified by substituting the following credit rates for the rates described in

the Chairman's Mark:

Joint Filers Heads of

Households

All Other Filers Credit Rate

$0-$20,000 $0-$15,000 $0-$10,000 50%

$20,001-$25,000 $15,001-$18,750 $10,001-$12,500 30%

$25,001-$30,000 $18,751-$22,500 $12,501-$15,000 25%

$30,001-$35,000 $22,501-$26,250 $15,001-$17,500 20%

$35,001-$40,000 $26,250-$30,000 $17,501-$20,000 15%

$40,001-$45,000 $30,001-$33,750 $20,001-$22,500 10%

$45,001-$50,000 $33,751-$37,500 $22,501-$25,000 5%

Over $50,000 Over $37,500 Over $25,000 0%

In addition, the provision of the proposal limiting eligibility for the credit to

individuals age 60 and younger would be deleted. Thus, the credit would be available to

persons who are age 18 or older, other than individuals who are full-time students or claimed

as a dependent on another taxpayer's return.

The modification would expand the provision in the Chairman's Mark requiring the

Secretary of Treasury to report annually the number of individuals who claim the credit by

requiring, in addition, that the Secretary report to the Senate Committee on Finance and the

House Committee on Ways and Means regarding the effect of the bill on pension coverage,

including any expansion of coverage for low- and moderate-income workers, levels of

pension benefits, quality of coverage, worker's access to and participation in plans, and

retirement security. This new report would be required to be submitted no later than four

years after the date of enactment.

Treatment of employer-provided retirement advice

The provision of the proposal relating to the treatment of employer-provided

retirement advice would be modified to add a direction to the Secretary of the Treasury to

conduct a study of the present-law rules that permit individuals to access their IRA or

qualified retirement plan benefits prior to retirement, including analyses of the use of the

existing rules and the extent to which such rules undermine the goal of accumulating

adequate resources for retirement. In addition, the Secretary of the Treasury would be

directed to conduct a study of the types of investment decisions made by IRA owners and
3

 This rule of inclusion does not apply to amounts deferred under a tax-qualified

retirement plan or similar plans.

-3-

participants in self-directed qualified retirement plans, including analyses of the existing

restrictions on investments and the extent to which additional restrictions would facilitate the

accumulation of adequate income for retirement. The studies would be required to be

submitted to the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee on Ways and

Means no later than January 1, 2002.

Notice and consent period regarding distributions

The provision of the proposal relating to the required notice and consent period

regarding distributions would be modified to add a requirement that a plan notify participants

of the existence of certain differences between the values of optional forms of benefit. If a

lump sum distribution is not the actuarial equivalent of an annuity form of distribution

available under a plan, the proposal would require the plan to include in the applicable

distribution notice, in a manner calculated to be understood by the average participant, a

notification that there is a difference in the values of the optional forms of benefit. This

provision would be effective for years after December 31, 2000.

II. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

The following provisions would be added to the Chairman's Mark.

1. Time of inclusion of benefits under section 457 plans

Present Law

A "section 457 plan" is an eligible deferred compensation plan of a State or local

government or tax-exempt employer that meets certain requirements. For example, amounts

deferred under a section 457 plan cannot exceed certain limits. Amounts deferred under a

section 457 plan are generally includible in income when paid or made available. Amounts

deferred under a plan of deferred compensation of a State or local government or tax-exempt

employer that does not meet the requirements of section 457 are includible in income when

the amounts are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, regardless of whether the

amounts have been paid or made available.3

The limits on section 457 plans were first applied to plans of tax-exempt employers

pursuant to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (the "1986 Act"), generally effective for taxable

years beginning after December 31, 1986. The limitations of section 457 do not apply to

amounts deferred under a plan of a tax-exempt employer by an individual covered under such

a plan on August 16, 1986, if the amounts (1) were deferred from taxable years beginning

before January 1, 1987, or (2) are deferred from taxable years beginning after December 31,
4

 Pub. L. No. 105-92.

-4-

1986, pursuant to an agreement that was in writing on August 16, 1986, and on such date

provided for a deferral for each taxable year covered by the agreement of a fixed amount or

of an amount determined pursuant to a fixed formula. The provision in (2) ceases to apply if

there is any modification to the agreement or formula.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would provide that amounts deferred under a section 457 plan of a State

or local government would be includible in income when paid.

In addition, the proposal would modify the transition rule adopted in the 1986 Act

relating to deferred compensation plans of tax-exempt employers. Under the proposal, the

transition rule would apply to agreements providing cost-of-living adjustments to benefits

that otherwise satisfy the requirements of the transition rule. As under present law, the

grandfather rule would cease to apply if any other modifications are made.

Effective Date

The proposal relating to governmental section 457 plans would be effective for years

beginning after December 31, 2000. The proposal relating to plans of tax-exempt

organizations would be effective on the date of enactment for cost-of-living increases after

September 1993.

2. Modifications to the SAVER Act

Present Law

The Savings Are Vital to Everyone's Retirement ("SAVER") Act4 initiated a publicprivate partnership to educate American workers about retirement savings and directed the

Department of Labor to maintain an ongoing program of public information and outreach. 

The Act also convened a National Summit on Retirement Savings held June 4-5, 1998, and to

be held again in 2001 and 2005, co-hosted by the President and the bipartisan Congressional

leadership. The National Summit brings together experts in the fields of employee benefits

and retirement savings, key leaders of government, and interested parties from the private

sector and general public. The delegates are selected by the Congressional leadership and the

President. The National Summit is a public-private partnership, receiving substantial funding

from private sector contributions. The goals of the National Summits are to: (1) advance the

public's knowledge and understanding of retirement savings and facilitate the development of

a broad-based, public education program; (2) identify the barriers which hinder workers from

setting aside adequate savings for retirement and impede employers, especially small

employers, from assisting their workers in accumulating retirement savings; and (3) develop
-5-

specific recommendations for legislative, executive, and private sector actions to promote

retirement income savings among American workers.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would make amendments to the SAVER Act regarding the

administration of future statutorily created National Summits on Retirement Savings. It

would clarify that such National Summits are to be held in the month of September in 2001

and 2005, and would add an additional National Summit in 2009. To facilitate the

administration of future National Summits, the Department of Labor would be given

authority to enter into cooperative agreements (pursuant to the Federal Grant and Cooperative

Agreement Act of 1977) with its 1999 summit partner, the American Savings Education

Council.

Six new statutory delegates would be added to future National Summits: the

Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate

Finance Committee, and the Subcommittee on Employer-Employee Relations of the House

Committee on Education and the Workforce. Further, the President, in consultation with the

Congressional leadership, could appoint up to three percent of the delegates (not to exceed

10) from a list of nominees provided by the private sector partner in Summit administration. 

The proposal would also clarify that new delegates are to be appointed for each future

National Summit (as was the intent of the original legislation) and would set deadlines for

their appointment.

The proposal would also set deadlines for the Department of Labor to publish the

Summit agenda, give the Department of Labor limited reception and representation authority,

and mandate that the Department of Labor consult with the Congressional leadership in

drafting the post-Summit report.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective on the date of enactment. 

III. DELETIONS OF PROVISIONS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE

OF RECONCILIATION INSTRUCTIONS

The modification to the Chairman's Mark would delete the following provisions that

are outside the scope of reconciliation instructions:

` Eliminate IRS user fees for certain determination letter requests regarding

employer plans

` Reduce PBGC premiums for small and new plans

` Extension of PBGC missing participants program
-6-

` Rules for substantial owner benefits in terminated plans