alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASIS INTERNET SERVICES, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

RICHARD RAUSCH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. 08-03186 EDL

ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE

Defendant Richard Rausch having filed for protection under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy

Code, and an automatic stay being in effect, there appears to be no reason at this time to maintain

Plaintiffs’ action against Defendant Rausch, which has been severed, as an open case for statistical

purposes, and the Clerk is instructed to submit a JS-6 Form to the Administrative Office.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action

against Defendant Rausch, and, should further proceedings against Defendant Rausch become

necessary or desirable, any party may initiate it in the same manner as if this Order had not been

entered. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 6, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03186-EDL Document 76 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 3:08-cv-03186-EDL Document 76 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2770 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2 amino 6 nitro phenol 

4 sulfonic acid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2 amino 

6 nitro phenol 4 sulfonic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2 AMINO 6 NITRO PHENOL 4 SULFONIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.37 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2 amino 6 nitro phenol 4 sulfonic acid) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2770 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7013** 

RALPH DORELL BARR , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
OFFICER NASH; SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY

ABINGDON FACILITY , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James C. Turk , Senior District Judge. ( 7:13

- cv - 00279

- JCT

- RSB )

Submitted : September 13, 2013 Decided: September 23, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ralph Dorell Barr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ralph Dorell Barr appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing hi s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (200 6 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barr v. Nash , No. 7:13

- cv - 00279

- JCT

RSB (W.D. Va. J une 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 71.9 Presentation of Americans at foreign courts.

The chief of the mission concerned may exercise his discretion in the matter of procuring the presentation of American citizens at the court of the country to which he is accredited.
#### AMERICAN MORTG. CO. v. SIRE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 17, 1905.)

Action by the American Mortgage Company against Henry B. Sire and others. No opinion. Motion denied, on payment of $10 costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             366
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          14,031
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,707
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,775
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,304
<LOANS>                                         38,902
<ALLOWANCE>                                        795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,151
<DEPOSITS>                                      56,017
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                161
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  72,151
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    864
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  266
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    74
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,204
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 643
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 643
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              561
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    244
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         244
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                         63
<LOANS-PAST>                                       121
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,521
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   803
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  795
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               666
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            129
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2619 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2619

To waive copayments and deductibles for military personnel who qualify 
  for TRICARE and use other health insurance as their primary form of 
                               coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2005

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive copayments and deductibles for military personnel who qualify 
  for TRICARE and use other health insurance as their primary form of 
                               coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TRICARE Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF COPAYMENTS AND DEDUCTIBLES FOR CERTAIN MEMBERS OF 
              UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Any member or former member of a uniformed 
service, or dependent of such a member, who is eligible for health 
benefits under the TRICARE program under chapter 55 of title 10, United 
States Code, and who has another insurance plan or program that 
provides primary coverage for health benefits shall not be required to 
pay any copayment or annual deductible under the TRICARE program.
    (b) Regulations.--The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe 
regulations to carry out subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 
health benefits provided after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Norma Springer et al., Respondents, v. John Carlson, Appellant. John Weibold, Respondent, v. John Carlson, Appellant.

Motion to stay examination before trial, pending appeal, granted on condition that appellant be ready to argue or submit the appeal on October 3, 1960, for which day the appeal is ordered to be placed on the calendar. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before September 1, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
§ 275.211(h)(2)-2 Adviser-led secondaries. ( a ) As a means reasonably designed to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative acts, practices, or courses of business within the meaning of section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-6(4), an investment adviser that is registered or required to be registered under section 203 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3) conducting an adviser-led secondary transaction with respect to any private fund that it advises (other than a securitized asset fund) shall comply with paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section. The investment adviser shall: ( 1 ) Obtain, and distribute to investors in the private fund, a fairness opinion or valuation opinion from an independent opinion provider; and
( 2 ) Prepare, and distribute to investors in the private fund, a written summary of any material business relationships the adviser or any of its related persons has, or has had within the two-year period immediately prior to the issuance of the fairness opinion or valuation opinion, with the independent opinion provider; in each case, prior to the due date of the election form in respect of the adviser-led secondary transaction.
( b ) For purposes of this section, defined terms shall have the meanings set forth in § 275.211(h)(1)-1.
[88 FR 63387, Sept. 14, 2023]
**Exhibit23.2**

Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-121853) pertaining to the Equity Incentive Plan of GMH Communities Trust ofour report dated March 14, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of GMH Communities Trust and the combined financialstatements of The GMH Predecessor Entities, GMH Communities Trust management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of GMHCommunities Trust, and our report, dated March 15, 2007, with respect tothe financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 ofFort Carson Family Housing, LLC, included in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|  | /s/ Reznick Group, P.C. |   |
|--|-------------------------|--------|

 

Baltimore, MarylandMarch 15, 2007

----
### §§8283, 8283a. Repealed. Pub. L. 99–412, title II, §201(a), Aug. 28, 1986, 100 Stat. 943

Section 8283, Pub. L. 95–619, title VII, §731, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §565, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 756, related to general requirements for utility programs and requirements concerning accounting and payment of costs.

Section 8283a, Pub. L. 95–619, title VII, §732, as added Pub. L. 96–294, title V, §565, June 30, 1980, 94 Stat. 757, related to requirements for building heating supplier programs and waiver of such requirements.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

CR No. 09-1193 MHP 1

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

ACADIA SENESE (CABN 251287)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, 11th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone:(415) 436-6809

Fax: (415) 436-7234

Email: acadia.senese@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DANIEL A. PESCE,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR No. 09-1193 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM JANUARY

25, 2010 TO MARCH 8, 2010

On January 25, 2010, the parties in this case appeared before the Honorable Marilyn H. Patel

for a status appearance. At that time, the parties stipulated that time should be excluded from the

Speedy Trial Act calculation from January 25, 2010 to March 8, 2010 for effective preparation of

defense counsel. The parties represented that granting the continuance was for the reasonable

time necessary for effective preparation of defense counsel, taking into account the exercise of

due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). 

The parties also agreed that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance 

//

//

//

Case 3:09-cr-01193-MHP Document 26 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

CR No. 09-1193 MHP 2

outweighed the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §

3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

DATED: 1/25/10 ______/s/___________________

ACADIA SENESE

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: 3/8/10 ______/s/______________________

ELIZABETH FALK

Attorney for Daniel A. Pesce

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act from January

25, 2010 to March 8, 2010, under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ ________________________________________

THE HON. MARILYN H. PATEL

United States District Court Judge 

3/16/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01193-MHP Document 26 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2894 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 340
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2894

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 16, 2005

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, as the ``Abraham 
               Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 102 
South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace 
Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 340

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2894

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 102 South Walters Avenue in Hodgenville, Kentucky, as the ``Abraham 
               Lincoln Birthplace Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of
Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                      |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                      |  |     |  |                           
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton   
|                      |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton       
|                      |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.1515 Suspension of MAP privileges. ( a ) *In general.* Only the MAP Lender Review Board may suspend a lender's eligibility for MAP, in accordance with the procedures of § 200.1535.
( b ) *Effect of suspension.* ( 1 ) A suspension may impose any conditions that may be imposed by probation.
( 2 ) During the suspension period a MAP lender: ( i ) Shall be removed from the MAP-approved lender list posted on HUD's Web site;
( ii ) May not submit, and the HUD field office may not accept, materials after the close of business of the date of the suspension letter for a new application for multifamily mortgage insurance from HUD; and
( iii ) May continue to process any existing application for multifamily mortgage insurance submitted to a Multifamily Hub or Program Center before the date of the suspension letter.
( 3 ) The MAP Lender Review Board may impose a higher level of review of the lender's underwriting by HUD;
( 4 ) Suspension is nationwide in effect.
( c ) *Duration of suspension.* ( 1 ) Suspension may not exceed 12 months, except where conditions are imposed. If both a time period and conditions are imposed, a suspension shall terminate only when: ( i ) The time period of the suspension has expired;
( ii ) The MAP lender has submitted a certification of compliance with those conditions to the Board; and
( iii ) The Board has notified the MAP lender it has received the certification of compliance and is satisfied that the corrective actions have occurred.
( 2 ) When suspension is lifted, the lender's name shall be promptly reinstated on the MAP-Approved Lender list posted on HUD's Web site.
#### § 203.260 Amount of mortgage insurance premium (periodic MIP).

The mortgagee shall pay to the Commissioner an initial MIP in an amount equal to one-half of one percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage for the first year of amortization. After payment of the initial MIP, the mortgagee shall pay to the Commissioner an amount equal to one-half of one percent of the average outstanding principal obligation of the mortgage for the 12-month period preceding each subsequent anniversary date of the beginning of amortization.

[48 FR 28805, June 23, 1983]
Exhibit 13



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2004
(the Report), we, Dennis Pok Man Lui and Tim L. Pennington, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, promulgated under Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 23, 2005



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Dennis Pok Man Lui
|Name:                  |  | Dennis Pok Man Lui     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      
|/s/ Tim L. Pennington 
|Name:                  |  | Tim L. Pennington      
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer