alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  601,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,400
<INVENTORY>                                    141,576
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,169,113
<PP&E>                                       1,387,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                 523,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,207,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,524,893
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,284
<OTHER-SE>                                   (416,557)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,207,620
<SALES>                                      9,188,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,188,036
<CGS>                                        6,451,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,297,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,071,219)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,071,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,071,219)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
### §5423. Grants to States

#### (a) Purposes

The Secretary is authorized to make grants to the States which have designated a State agency under section 5422 of this title to assist them—

(1) in identifying their needs and responsibilities in the area of manufactured home construction and safety standards; or

(2) in developing State plans under section 5422 of this title.

#### (b) Designation by Governor of State agency for receipt of grant

The Governor of each State shall designate the appropriate State agency for receipt of any grant made by the Secretary under this section.

#### (c) Submission of application by State agency to Secretary; review by Secretary

Any State agency designated by the Governor of a State desiring a grant under this section shall submit an application therefor to the Secretary. The Secretary shall review and either accept or reject such application.

#### (d) Amount of Federal share; equality of distribution of funds

The Federal share for each State grant under subsection (a) of this section may not exceed 90 per centum of the total cost to the State in identifying its needs and developing its plan. In the event the Federal share for all States under such subsection is not the same, the differences among the States shall be established on the basis of objective criteria.

(Pub. L. 93–383, title VI, §624, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 713; Pub. L. 96–399, title III, §308(c)(4), Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1641.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 96–399 substituted "manufactured home" for "mobile home".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 180 days following Aug. 22, 1974, see section 627 of Pub. L. 93–383, set out as a note under section 5401 of this title.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel A. Coccoluto, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to myknowledge, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Daniel A. Coccoluto |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Daniel A. Coccoluto     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2006       |

 

1

----
APPENDIX P: HYDROLOGICAL CONDITIONS REPORT 

(Summary) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Georgetown University Boathouse 

Environmental Assessment 

April 2006
#### § 203.16 Certificate and contract regarding use of dwelling for transient or hotel purposes.

Every application filed with respect to insurance of mortgages on a two-, three-, or four-family dwelling, or a single-family dwelling which is one of a group of 5 or more single-family dwellings held by the same mortgagor, must be accompanied by a contract in form satisfactory to the Commissioner, signed by the proposed mortgagor covenanting and agreeing that so long as the proposed mortgage is insured by the Commissioner the mortgagor will not rent the housing or any part thereof covered by the mortgage for transient or hotel purposes, together with the mortgagor's certification under oath that the housing or any part thereof covered by the proposed mortgage will not be rented for transient or hotel purposes. For the purpose of this subchapter rental for transient or hotel purposes shall mean (a) rental for any period less than 30 days or (b) any rental if the occupants of the housing accommodations are provided customary hotel services such as room service for food and beverages, maid service, furnishing and laundering of linen, and bellboy service.
#### Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency, Appellant, v Clifton Holding Inc.,

#### Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Pursuant to this court’s decision in its memorandum of June 3, 1977 (58 AD2d 732), commissioners of condemnation submitted supplemental findings explaining the basis for their award in this case. In view of these supplemental findings, we conclude that the commissioners’ determination is supported by adequate and sufficient findings and that since there was no improper award of double compensation, the award should be affirmed. (Resubmission of appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court— condemnation.) Present.—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Bruce J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify that:

          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Emergent
Group Inc.;

          2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

          4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

          5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

          6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:  August 11, 2004                    /s/ Bruce J. Haber
                                          ------------------
                                          Bruce J. Haber,
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### WEDDIGAN et al., Respondents, v. WHITING, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 13, 1903.)

Action by Frank A. Weddigan and others against William F. Whiting.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

ADAMS, P. J., not voting.
(April 28, 1978)

#### In the Matter of Eugene Cooperman, Respondent, v Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services of the State of New York, Appellant.

Motion by respondent, pursuant to section 753 of the Judiciary Law, for order punishing appellant for civil contempt for his failure to comply with the judgment of the Supreme Court, Albany County, entered May 10, 1976 and affirmed by order of this court dated June 10, 1977. The motion is improperly made in this court (CPLR 5524, subd [b]; see 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5524.03) and is hereby transferred to the Special Term of Supreme Court, Albany County, scheduled for May 25, 1978. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### § 237.10 Payment to USAID of excess amounts received by a Noteholder.

If a Noteholder shall, as a result of USAID paying compensation under this Guarantee, receive an excess payment, it shall refund the excess to USAID.
Case 3:09-cr-00977-SI Document 22 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1006.227 Tenant-based or project-based rental assistance. NHHBG funds may be used for the provision of tenant-based rental assistance, which may include security deposits and first month's rent, and project-based rental assistance. ( a ) Rental assistance must comply with the requirements of this part and be provided to eligible families.
( b ) Rental assistance may be provided to eligible families both on and off the Hawaiian Home Lands provided such use is consistent with the applicable appropriations acts governing the use of the NHHBG funds.
[89 FR 9761, Feb. 12, 2024]
#### (A) In the Matter of the Estate of Harry D. Gould, Deceased. (B) Joseph Mazzucco et al., Respondents, v. Albert W. Eastman et al., Appellants. (C) Howard E. Van Zile et al., Appellants, v. Leland B. Manchester, Doing Business as Warnerville Garage, et al., Respondents. (D) In the Matter of the Claim of Luis Munoz, Respondent, v. Timbertone Decorative Company, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

[In each action] Appeals dismissed, without costs, unless appellants shall file and serve records, briefs and notes of issue for the September 1962 Term on or before August 1, 1962, in which event motions denied. Present—Coon, J. P., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2004)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 76587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28027]



[[Page 76585]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2005-11 of December 10, 2004--Renewal of 
Trade Agreement With the Socialist Republic of Vietnam


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2004 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 76587]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2005-11 of December 10, 
                2004

                
Renewal of Trade Agreement with the Socialist 
                Republic of Vietnam

                Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

                Pursuant to my authority under subsection 405(b)(1)(B) 
                of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2435(b)(1)(B)), I 
                have determined that actual or foreseeable reductions 
                in U.S. tariffs and nontariff barriers to trade 
                resulting from multilateral negotiations are being 
                satisfactorily reciprocated by the Socialist Republic 
                of Vietnam. I have further found that a satisfactory 
                balance of concessions in trade and services has been 
                maintained during the life of the Agreement on Trade 
                Relations between the United States of America and the 
                Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)B

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 10, 2004.

[FR Doc. 04-28027
Filed 12-20-04; 9:22 am]
Billing code 3190-W5-P
"Rausch, L. (Louette)" 

<Louette.Rausch2@akzonobel

.com>

02/01/2012 09:15 AM

To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc

"christina_franz@americanchemistry.com" 

<christina_franz@americanchemistry.com>, "Rausch, L. 

(Louette)" <Louette.Rausch2@akzonobel.com>

bcc

Subject NTAN EHPV Submission-Revised III

Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals LLC has sponsored acetonitrile, 2,2’2”- nitrilotris- (CAS# 

7327-60-8), also known as NTAN, in the U.S. EHPV program. The revised NTAN EHPV 

Submission, which includes the revised test plan and revised robust summaries, in IUCLID5 

format, are attached. 

The IUCLID5 has been revised from that submitted on 08-10-2011 to correct information on the 

identity of the test article in one of the endpoint summaries.

In the previous version of the test plan (February 2009) it was proposed to perform vapor 

pressure (OECD 104), water solubility (OECD 105), combined repeat 

dose/reproductive/developmental (OECD 422) and genetic toxicity studies on NTAN. These 

studies are now finalized.

Additional studies were performed to comply with the REACH (Registration Evaluation 

Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) legislation as follows.

Physical/chemical characteristics; density (OECD 109), particle size distribution (NEN-ISO 

13320-1) and auto flammability (EU method A.16).

Environmental: Biodegradation in water (OECD 301D), short-term toxicity to aquatic 

invertebrates (OECD 202) and toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria (OECD 201).

All data mentioned above, in addition to existing data on phys-chem, acute toxicity and irritation 

obtained during data gathering under REACH has been summarized in IUCLID5 and included in 

the test plan. 
The original REACH disseminated NTAN dossier is publically available and can be located on 

the ECHA website at:

http://apps.echa.europa.eu/registered/registered-sub.aspx

Please contact me if you have any questions. 

Best regards,

Louette J. Rausch, M.S.

Expertise Leader Regulatory Affairs Americas 

HSE Department

T +1-312-544-7061 

F +1-312-544-7125 

M +1-630-881-7749 

E louette.rausch@akzonobel.com

Akzo Nobel Services Inc. 

525 W. Van Buren St. 

Chicago, Il 60607-3835 

United States 

www.akzonobel.com

Follow AkzoNobel online at www.akzonobel.com/followus

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged and 

confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual and/or entity identified in the 
address of this message. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete 

and destroy this message, including any back-up copies. Please refer to 

www.akzonobel.com/legal-entities for further legal information regarding the sending entity if 

from the EU, Croatia, Norway, Turkey, Ukraine or Switzerland. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 - NTAN Revised Test Plan 08-10-2011.pdf - NTAN-EPA IUCLID5 Feb 1 2012.pdf
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Keenan Twiggs, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered October 8, 1976, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of not less then one and one-half nor more than three years as a predicate felon. The sole issue on this appeal is whether the defendant should have been permitted to withdraw his plea of guilty. The record before us discloses that defendant’s guilty plea was based on an agreement between the defendant’s attorney, the District Attorney’s office, and the court that the defendant would receive a sentence of one year in the Albany County jail upon his plea of guilty. At the sentencing, in response to defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, the court stated: "The Court at the time of accepting the plea indicated to the defendant as a result of plea negotiations, all things being equal, this Court would impose a sentence of one year in the Albany County Jail. Obviously, all things are not equal since the defendant is a predicate felon under our law and, by operation of law, must be sentenced to a minimum of imprisonment.” While withdrawal of a plea is within the discretion of the trial court, where, as here, an understanding was reached at the time the defendant entered his plea that he would receive a particular sentence, which the court was powerless to impose when the defendant was thereafter charged with being a predicate felon, the defendant is entitled to an opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty and stand trial *(People v Selikoff,*35 NY2d 227, 238-239; *People v Ransom, 55*AD2d 980, 981; *People v Bailey,*50 AD2d 522). Judgment reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Albany County for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mahoney and Main, JJ., concur.
#### Louis B. Davidow et al., Respondents, v. Arthur Donow et al., Appellants, ,e.t al., Defendant.

In an action by stockholders to annul and to declare void the election of defendant Cele Weiss as a director, and to declare certain other acts of the defendants, other than defendant Freiman, of no validity or effect, the defendants (other than Freiman) appeal, upon a settled bill of exceptions, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 29, 1961, upon the decision of the court after a nonjury trial, in favor of the plain*682tiffs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. *No*opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In re : YAN SUI, De

btor, YAN SUI, Appe lla

nt, v. R IC HARD ALAN M AR SHAC K, C ha pte r 7 Truste e ; e t a l., Appe lle e s. No. 13-60020 B AP No. 12-1408 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Ninth C irc uit B ankruptc y

Appe lla te Pane l Kirsc he r, Pa

ppa s, a nd Dunn, B ankruptc y Judge s, Pre siding Subm itte d

June 25, 2014 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C i rc u it Judge s. 

# FIL ED JUL 7 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Yan Sui a ppe a ls pro sefrom

the B a nkruptc y Appe lla te Pane l’ s (“ B AP” ) dism issa l a s m oot of Sui’ s a ppe a l from

the ba nk ruptc y c ourt’ s orde r granting the ba nkruptc y truste e ’ s m o tion for a

pprova l of the se ttle m e nt of four sta te c ourt a c tions. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 158(d). W e re vie w de novo the B AP’ s m ootne ss de te rm inat ion, N at’l Mass Med

ia Te le c omm. Sy

s., Inc . v . Stanle

y (In reN a t’l Mass Me dia Te le c omm. Sy s., Inc .) , 152 F.3d 1178, 1180 (9th C ir. 1998), a nd we a ffirm . The B AP prope rly

dismi sse d Sui’ s a

ppe a l a s m o o t be c a

use the se ttle m e nt a gre e m e nt ha d be e n

c onsum m ate d a nd m ost of theunde rly ing sta te c ourt la wsuits ha d be e n dismisse d

with pre judic e , re nde ring it ine quita ble to c onside r the m e rits of Sui’ s a ppe a l. Se e Motor Ve hic leC as. C o . v . Thorpe

Insulation C

o. (In re ThorpeInsulation C

o .) , 677 F.3d 869, 880-81 (9th C ir. 2012) (disc ussing e q uita ble m ootne ss doc trine ). B e c a use Sui’ s a

ppe a l is m oot, we do not c onside r his a rgum e nts on a

ppe a l a ddre s sing theunde rly ing m e rits. W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r the B AP’ s orde rs de ny ing Sui’ s e m e rge nc y m otion for a

sta y pe nding a

ppe a l a nd m otion for re c o n side ration be c a u se Sui fa ile d to file a tim e ly notic e of a

ppe a l from

those orde rs. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 4(a)(1), 6(b). 1 3 - 6 0 0 2 0 2Sui’ s re q u e st for judic ia l notic e , file d on July 19, 2013, is gra nte d. The truste e ’ s re que st to supplem e nt the re c ord on a ppe a l a nd re que st for judic ia l notic e , file d on Se pte m be r 11, 2013, is gra

nte d. AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 6 0 0 2 0 3
exv10w1







Exhibit 10.1 Description of Bonus Plan



The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Peoples Financial
Corporation (the “Company”) awards bonuses to the Company’s executive officers based upon
pre-determined performance objectives. The executive officers are eligible to receive a bonus
which is based on the financial performance of the Company. The specific formula and
pre-determined goals were established by the Committee using the Company’s return on average assets
(“ROA”). The bonus calculation, which is approved by the Committee, allows the executive officer
to earn up to a maximum percentage of their salary on established ROA targets. The targets and
bonus calculations as a percentage of salary and targets are:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Base	 	 	Base + 1	 	 	Base + 2	 	 	Base + 3	 	 	Maximum	 
	 	 	 
	ROA Target
	 	 	.670	%	 	 	.800	%	 	 	.925	%	 	 	1.050	%	 	 	1.175	%
	 
	Chief Executive
Officer
	 	 	15.000	%	 	 	18.750	%	 	 	22.500	%	 	 	26.250	%	 	 	30.000	%
	 
	Executive Vice
President
	 	 	12.500	%	 	 	15.630	%	 	 	18.750	%	 	 	21.880	%	 	 	25.000	%
	 
	All Other Named
Executive Officers
	 	 	10.000	%	 	 	12.500	%	 	 	15.000	%	 	 	17.500	%	 	 	20.000	%