alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          57,563
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                35,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,783,085
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,629,033
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,628,266
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,226,465
<SHORT-TERM>                                   125,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            230,897
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,247,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           792
<OTHER-SE>                                     797,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,628,266
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 67,556
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               61,431
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   694
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               129,681
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              44,552
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,091
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           51,590
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,185
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                112,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (54,109)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (55,766)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,916)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,682)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.82)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.91
<LOANS-NON>                                     17,933
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,363
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,606
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                40,207
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       18
<RECOVERIES>                                        83
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,272
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         40,272
        

</TABLE>
### §6250a. Authority

To the extent necessary or appropriate to carry out this part, the Secretary may—

(1) purchase, contract for, lease, or otherwise acquire, in whole or in part, storage and related facilities, and storage services;

(2) use, lease, maintain, sell, or otherwise dispose of storage and related facilities acquired under this part;

(3) acquire by purchase, exchange (including exchange of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or received as royalty from Federal lands), lease, or otherwise, petroleum distillate for storage in the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve;

(4) store petroleum distillate in facilities not owned by the United States; and

(5) sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of petroleum distillate from the Reserve established under this part, including to maintain the quality or quantity of the petroleum distillate in the Reserve or to maintain the operational capability of the Reserve.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §182, as added Pub. L. 106–469, title II, §201(a)(3), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2034.)
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:08:33-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company *et al. v.*Western Union Telegraph Company (two cases).

July 11, 1912.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court. March 18, 1912.

*Joseph B. & Bryan Gumming, Tye, Peeples & Jordan,*and *Charles R. Clark Jr.,*for plaintiffs. *Dorsey, Brewster, Howell & Iieyman*and *William H. Barrett,*for defendant.

Evans, P. J.

These cases, and that of *Western*& *Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Western Union Telegraph Co.,*were argued together, and are controlled by the rulings made in the latter case, this day decided.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    875,614
<SECURITIES>                                               73,143
<RECEIVABLES>                                             662,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                29,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,640,128
<PP&E>                                                    320,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                           (124,241)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          2,393,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     165,130
<BONDS>                                                   467,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                               550,000
<COMMON>                                                6,977,988
<OTHER-SE>                                                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            2,393,154
<SALES>                                                    34,039
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           34,039
<CGS>                                                   1,452,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           1,452,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           82,855
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       (76,581)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (1,501,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (1,418,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                (63,020)
<NET-INCOME>                                          (1,501,338)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer
of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



May 20, 2014



/s/ R. Greg Smith

R. Greg Smith

Chief Financial Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2798 

To authorize the disinterment from the American Ardennes Cemetery at 

Neuville-en-Condroz, Belgium, of the remains of Sergeant Roaul R. 

Prieto, who died in combat in April 1945, and to authorize the transfer 

of his remains to his next of kin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005 

Mrs. BONO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize the disinterment from the American Ardennes 

Cemetery at Neuville-en-Condroz, Belgium, of the remains of Sergeant Roaul R. Prieto, who died in combat 

in April 1945, and to authorize the transfer of his remains to his next of kin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2798 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF DISINTERMENT AND 

2 TRANSFER OF CUSTODY OF REMAINS OF A 

3 SPECIFIED AMERICAN WORLD WAR II FATAL4 ITY INTERRED IN THE AMERICAN ARDENNES 

5 CEMETERY, BELGIUM. 

6 (a) DISINTERMENT.—The Secretary of the Army and 

7 the American Battle Monuments Commission shall take 

8 such steps as are necessary to authorize the next of kin 

9 of Sergeant Roaul R. Prieto, United States Army, who 

10 died on April 6, 1945, as a result of a mid-air collision 

11 during a bombing mission over Leipzig, Germany, to dis12 inter his remains from the American Ardennes Cemetery, 

13 Neuville-en-Condroz, Belgium (such remains being in14 terred in Plot A, Row 41, Grave 46). 

15 (b) TRANSFER.—The Secretary of the Army and the 

16 American Battle Monuments Commission shall take such 

17 steps as are necessary to authorize the transfer of the re18 mains of Roaul R. Prieto to the custody of his next of 

19 kin. 

20 (c) NO EXPENDITURE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.—No 

21 Federal funds may be expended for the disinterment and 

22 transfer of custody authorized by this section. 

Æ
#### Gore *v.*Gore.

May 15, 1912.

Temporary alimony, etc. Before Judge Worrill. Kandolph superior court. February 24, 1912.

*M. G. Edwards*and *George E.*Perry, for plaintiff in error.

Evans, P. J.

Where on the hearing of an application for temporary alimony the evidence is conflicting as to the cause of the separation,— the wife contending that she separated from her husband because of his cruelty, and the husband contending that his conduct was kind and considerate, the discretion of the court in awarding a reasonable sum for alimony and attorney’s fees will not be disturbed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Richard K. Simon, Esq. 1700 Decker School Lane Malibu, CA 90265 (310) 503-7286

Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Attention: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket AGC-610 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591
Re: Part 16 Complaint March 27, 2015



## RECEIVED MAR 2 7 

### 2015

PART 16 DOCKETS



### National BusinessAviationAssociation, KruegerAviation, Inc., Harrison Ford,justiceAviation, Kim Davidson Aviation, Inc., Aero Film, Youri Bujko, jamesRoss, Paramount Citrus LLCandAircraft Owners andPilots Association v. City of Santa Monica, California Docket Nos. 16-14-04/FAA-2014-0592
Correction to Response ofthe Complainants to Request for Additional Information Complainants have identified a typographical error in their Response dated March 25, 2015. On p. 5, a bullet point states that: "The blast wall was placed into service on or about May 27, 2002." Consistent with p. 2 ofthe response, the cited date should be March 27, 2002.

# Rk~ 1700 Decker School Lane Malibu, CA 90265 310-503-7286

1Certificate ofService
Ihereby certify that I have this day caused the foregoing answerto be served on the following persons byfirst-class mail with a copyby electronic mail:
Elaine Polachek Interim City Manager Martin Pastucha Interim Assistant City Manager City ofSanta Monica 1685 Main Street, Room 209 Santa Monica, CA 90401 elaine.polachek@vsmgov.net martin.pastucha@smgov.net
Marsha Moutrie, City Attorney joseph Lawrence, Assistant City Attorney Lance Gams, Deputy City Attorney Ivan Campbell, Deputy City Attorney City of Santa Monica 1685 Main Street, Room 310 Santa Monica, CA 90401 marsha.moutrie(alsmgov.net joseph.lawrenceCmsmgov.net lance.gams@smgov.net ivan.campbell@smg_ov.net
Stelios Makrides Airport Manager City ofSanta Monica Airport Administration Building 3223 Donald Douglas Loop South Santa Monica, CA 90405 .stelios.makrides@smgov.net
Dated this 27th day ofMarch 2015.

2 

# RECEIVED MAR ::::1 2015
PART 16 DOCKETS
### §7140. Leasing Liaison Committee; establishment; composition

There is established a Leasing Liaison Committee which shall be composed of an equal number of members appointed by the Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title II, §210, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577.)
### §5516. Transfer of functions

Within sixty days after the effective date of the law creating the Energy Research and Development Administration or any other law creating a permanent Federal organization or agency having jurisdiction over the energy research and development functions of the United States (or within sixty days after September 3, 1974, if the effective date of such law occurs prior to the enactment of this subchapter), the energy research and development functions vested in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation under this subchapter and any funds which may have been appropriated pursuant to section 5517 of this title, to the extent necessary or appropriate, may, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Management and Budget, be transferred to and vested in the Energy Research and Development Administration or such other organization or agency.

(Pub. L. 93–409, §18, Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1078.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Energy Research and Development Administration terminated and functions vested by law in Administrator thereof transferred to Secretary of Energy (unless otherwise specifically provided) by sections 7151(a) and 7293 of this title.

Functions of National Science Foundation relating to or utilized in connection with solar heating and cooling development transferred to Administrator of Energy Research and Development Administration by section 5814(f) of this title.
### §7384r. Separate treatment of chronic silicosis

#### (a) Sense of Congress

Congress finds that employees who worked in Department of Energy test sites and later contracted chronic silicosis should also be considered for inclusion in the compensation program. Recognizing that chronic silicosis resulting from exposure to silica is not a condition unique to the nuclear weapons industry, it is not the intent of Congress with this subchapter to establish a precedent on the question of chronic silicosis as a compensable occupational disease. Consequently, it is the sense of Congress that a further determination by the President is appropriate before these workers are included in the compensation program.

#### (b) Certification by President

A covered employee with chronic silicosis shall be treated as a covered employee (as defined in section 7384l(1) of this title) for the purposes of the compensation program required by section 7384d of this title unless the President submits to Congress not later than 180 days after October 30, 2000, the certification of the President that there is insufficient basis to include such employees. The President shall submit with the certification any recommendations about the compensation program with respect to covered employees with chronic silicosis as the President considers appropriate.

#### (c) Exposure to silica in the performance of duty

A covered employee shall, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, be determined to have been exposed to silica in the performance of duty for the purposes of the compensation program if, and only if, the employee was present for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days during the mining of tunnels at a Department of Energy facility located in Nevada or Alaska for tests or experiments related to an atomic weapon.

#### (d) Covered employee with chronic silicosis

For purposes of this subchapter, the term "covered employee with chronic silicosis" means a Department of Energy employee, or a Department of Energy contractor employee, with chronic silicosis who was exposed to silica in the performance of duty as determined under subsection (c).

#### (e) Chronic silicosis

For purposes of this subchapter, the term "chronic silicosis" means a nonmalignant lung disease if—

(1) the initial occupational exposure to silica dust preceded the onset of silicosis by at least 10 years; and

(2) a written diagnosis of silicosis is made by a medical doctor and is accompanied by—

(A) a chest radiograph, interpreted by an individual certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health as a B reader, classifying the existence of pneumoconioses of category 1/0 or higher;

(B) results from a computer assisted tomograph or other imaging technique that are consistent with silicosis; or

(C) lung biopsy findings consistent with silicosis.

(Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3627], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–505; Pub. L. 107–107, div. C, title XXXI, §3151(a)(3), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1372.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Subsec. (e)(2)(A). Pub. L. 107–107 substituted "category 1/0" for "category 1/1".
Editorial Note on Part 217
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 217 appear at 68 FR 51362, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 217.45 Housing. ( a ) *Housing provided by the recipient.* A recipient that provides housing to its nonhandicapped students shall provide comparable, convenient, and accessible housing to handicapped students at the same cost as to others. At the end of the transition period provided for in subpart C, such housing shall be available in sufficient quantity and variety so that the scope of handicapped students' choice of living accommodations is, as a whole, comparable to that of nonhandicapped students.
( b ) *Other housing.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students shall take such action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing is, as a whole, made available in a manner that does not result in discrimination on the basis of handicap.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-421 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Status of Forces 

 Memorandum of Understanding between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FINLAND 

Signed March 31 and April 21, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
FINLAND 

Defense: Status of Forces 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 March 31 and April 21, 2005; 

 Entered into force April 21, 2005.
(April 18, 1977)

#### Board of Education of the New Paltz Central School District, Respondent, v New Paltz United Teachers, Appellant.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated October 15, 1976, which granted the application. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, petition dismissed on the merits, and the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration forthwith. No fact findings were presented for review on this appeal. The appellant teachers’ association commenced a grievance proceeding when the petitioner-respondent board of education rescinded a long-standing policy of permitting the children of nonresident teachers employed by it to attend its schools without paying tuition. Discontinuation of the practice allegedly violated that portion of the collective bargaining agreement which provided that "Any District policies unaltered or unchanged by the language of this Agreement shall remain in force”. Appellant’s demand for arbitration was opposed by petitioner on two grounds: one, that the issue was not embraced by the agreement; and two, that a continuation of the tuition-free policy "would be a violation of law” and should have been discontinued earlier. The Special Term stayed arbitration on the second ground advanced, holding that a policy of free tuition for children of nonresident teachers, and not for children of other nonresidents, was violative of the equal protection guarantees and that such violation "restrict[ed] the freedom to arbitrate” (see *Matter of Susquehanna Val. Cent. School Dist. at Conklin [Susquehanna Val. Teachers’ Assn.],*37 NY2d 614, 617). We reverse on our holding that distinguishing, for tuition purposes, between children of nonresidents on the basis of whether the nonresident parent teaches in the petitioner’s school district, is not invidiously discriminatory. There are rational bases for the difference in treatment. As appellant suggests, the policy may have been adopted to attract qualified teachers from outside of the immediate community; or upon the belief that teachers whose children attended school in the district would be more involved in, and more concerned about, the educa*584tional program of the district; *or*to reward nonresident teachers for services performed by them which were not performed by other nonresidents. In short, whether these and/or other bases underlie the tuition-free policy for the children of nonresident teachers, it is clear that the policy is not arbitrary or without a rational basis. Nonresident children are entitled, of course, to attend schools in another school district (see Education Law, § 3202, subd 2). We do not, by determining that the tuition-free policy is not unconstitutional, imply that it may not be discontinued. We hold only that the matter is one for arbitration under the existing agreement (see, e.g., *Matter of Board of Educ. v Yonkers Federation of Teachers,*40 NY2d 268). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 512.14 Suspending or terminating collection action.

The suspension or termination of collection action shall be made in accordance with the standards set forth in part 104 of the Federal Claims Collection Standard (4 CFR part 104).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Donald Clarence Smith, Appellant.

Order affirmed upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Graves at Special Term (34 Mise 2d 343). Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur.