alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 96 (Friday, May 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 29132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11873]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9814-6] (EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0124)

Good Neighbor Environmental Board; Notification of Public 
Advisory Committee Teleconference

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice. Public Advisory Committee Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notice is hereby given that the Good Neighbor Environmental Board 
(GNEB) will hold a public teleconference on Tuesday, June 4, 2013, 
Tuesday, August 6, 2013, and Tuesday, October 1, 2013. Each meeting 
will take place from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The 
meeting is open to the public. For further information regarding the 
teleconference and background materials, please contact Mark Joyce at 
the number listed below.

DATES: Tuesday, June 4, 2013, Tuesday, August 6, 2013, and Tuesday, 
October 1, 2013. Each meeting will take place from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. 
Eastern Standard Time.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: GNEB is a federal advisory committee chartered under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463. GNEB provides 
advice and recommendations to the President and Congress on 
environmental and infrastructure issues along the U.S. border with 
Mexico.
    Purpose of Meeting: The purpose of each of these teleconferences 
will be to discuss the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's Sixteenth 
Report. The report will focus on ecological restoration in the U.S.-
Mexico border region.
    General Information: The agenda and meeting materials will be 
available at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-
2013-0124. General information about GNEB can be found on its Web site 
at www.epa.gov/ofacmo/gneb.
    If you wish to make oral comments or submit written comments to the 
Board, please contact Mark Joyce at least five days prior to the 
meeting. Written comments should be submitted at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2013-0124.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for 
individuals with disabilities, please contact Mark Joyce at (202) 564-
2130 or email at joyce.mark@epa.gov. To request accommodation of a 
disability, please contact Mark Joyce at least 10 days prior to the 
meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: May 7, 2013.
Mark Joyce,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-11873 Filed 5-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS SERIES MAP I-2722

## Digital Data and Geologic Map of the Powder Mill Ferry Quadrangle, Shannon and Reynolds Counties, Missouri

### By Robert C. McDowell, Richard W. Harrison, and Kerry M. Lagueux

Online Version 1.0

---

#### README FILEDESCRIPTIONS OF THE ARC/INFO EXPORT FORMAT FILES

#### METADATA IN STANDARD FGDC FORMAT

#### PDF FILE OF MAP

> The PDF file of the map will produce a plot that faithfully replicates the format, symbols, colors, and line work of a USGS full-color printed map. (The actual published paper map is a 4-color offset-printed map.) The file size is 7.7 MB, and page size at 100% is approximately 58" by 42". Plot resolution, quality, and colors will vary with plotter, inks, and paper used. Adobe Acrobat Reader 4 is required to read the map. Acrobat Reader 3 cannot display the maps because the page size exceeds the program's capabilities.
> 
> PDF file of Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2722 [7.7 MB]
> 
> 
> Thumbnail of PDF mapIf you wish to 
> download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge, click here.

#### DOWNLOAD ARC/INFO EXPORT FILES



> The following export files are presented in two projections: geographic coordinates and UTM NAD83. All files with a *83.e00 name are in Arc export format, with a UTM projection, zone 15, units in meters, datum NAD83, and spheroid GRS80. All files with a *.e00 name (in separate volume) are in Arc export format, with a geographic projection, units in decimal degrees, datum NAD27, and spheroid Clarke1866.
> 
> 
> The files have been compressed in two separate volumes:
> 
> Geographic coordinates: proj_dd.zip [4.2 MB]
> NAD83 coordinates: proj_utm.zip [4.5 MB]
> 
> If you wish to 
> download the latest version of 
> ArcExplorer, the lightweight GIS data viewer developed by ESRI, free of charge, click here.

The offset-printed version of this map is available for purchase from USGS Information Services. See
Ordering U.S. Geological Survey Products, call toll-free (from the U.S.) 1-888-ASK-USGS, or e-mail infoservices@usgs.gov.

---
#### Henry J. Karstens *&*Company, appellee, v. Lawrence C. O’Brien, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,535.

Action for a balance for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 3 922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 30, 1922.

Kelly, Burns, Daly & Fitzgerald, for appellant; James D. Murphy, of counsel. William G. Wise, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases. /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER REGARDING 

RESPONSES TO 

RECENT QUESTIONS

Good cause not having been shown, the entirety of the Taylor Declaration filed with

Schwab’s latest response is hereby STRICKEN. The previous request for information was explicit

that the responses be limited to what was in the existing summary judgment record.

With respect to plaintiffs’ submissions, the Court did not rely upon the materials

concerning mutual fund industry custom from the expert report of Allen Ferrell. Those references

to the Ferrell Report, also not in the existing summary judgment record, are STRICKEN.

Finally, the Court STRIKES plaintiffs’ reference to the Charles Schwab book, which was

not part of the existing summary judgment record and was raised for the first time at the March 25

hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 588 Filed 04/08/10 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KENT WU, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR 09-1001 MMC

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY

ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Having considered the application for a preliminary order of forfeiture filed by the United

States and the defendant’s plea of guilty on March 24, 2010, wherein the defendant admitted to

the forfeiture allegation, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following property is forfeited to the United States:

1. $36,590.13 in United States Currency which was seized from the residence located at

2340 20 Avenue, San Francisco, CA; th

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States, through its appropriate agency, shall

seize the forfeited property forthwith and publish on www.forfeiture.gov, a government website 

for at least thirty days, notice of this Order, notice of the government’s intent to dispose of the 

property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct and provide notice that any person,

Case 3:09-cr-01001-MMC Document 44 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

other than the defendant, having or claiming a legal interest in the property must file a petition

with the Court and serve a copy on government counsel within thirty (30) days of the final

publication of notice or of receipt of actual notice, whichever is earlier.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 32.2(c)(1)(B), of the Federal

Criminal Rules of Procedure, that the United States may take discovery as to any third party

claim which is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Criminal

Rules of Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at

the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of 2010.

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE 2

CR 09-1001 MMC

11th June

Case 3:09-cr-01001-MMC Document 44 Filed 06/11/10 Page 2 of 2
#### James J. Flood et al. v. Stephen P. Kennedy, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
### §4746. Coordination of Federal programs

The Office, after consultation with other agencies concerned, shall—

(1) prescribe regulations concerning administration of training for employees and officials of State and local governments provided for in this subchapter, including requirements for coordination of and reasonable consistency in such training programs;

(2) coordinate the training support given to State and local governments under authority of this chapter with training support given such governments under other Federal programs; and

(3) make such arrangements, including the collection and maintenance of data on training grants and programs, as may be necessary to avoid duplication of programs providing for training and to insure consistent administration of related Federal training activities, with particular regard to title IX of the Higher Education Act of 1965.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title III, §306, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1920; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in par. (2), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–648, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1909, known as the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4701 of this title and Tables.

The Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in par. (3), is Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219. Title IX of the Act was classified generally to subchapter IX (§1134 et seq.) of chapter 28 of Title 20, Education, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–244, title VII, §702, Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1803. Title IX as originally added by Pub. L. 89–329 related to education for the public service. Pub. L. 92–318 struck out title IX and inserted in lieu thereof a new title IX relating to graduate programs. Subsequently Pub. L. 99–498 extensively revised title IX relating to graduate programs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of Title 20 and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Office", meaning Office of Personnel Management, substituted in text for "Commission", meaning Civil Service Commission, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in Civil Service Commission and Chairman thereof to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.
_____________________________________________________________________________

State of Israel Ministry of Transport / Civil Aviation Authority

Golan House / Golan st. P.O.B. 1101 / Airport City 70100 / Israel / Tel. +972.3.9774545 / www.caa.gov.il

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director, Office of International Aviation 

Office of the Secretary of Aviation and International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington DC20590 

Subject: C.A.L. Cargo Air Lines 7th Freedom Ad-Hoc Charter Flights to the USA

Dear Mr. Gretch, 

The Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI) hereby confirms that the State of Israel 

would accord reciprocal treatment to any U.S. designated air carrier requests 

comparable to the pending request of C.A.L. – Cargo Air Lines to operate 7th freedom 

ad-hoc all cargo charter flights to/from Israel. 

CC: Mr. Robert Finamore – Acting Division Chief Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division, 

 Department of Transport. 

 

International Relations Division 

Phone: 972.3.9774520 No. 05646813 

Fax: 972.3.9774594 Date: April 9, 2013 

donyehiyai@mot.gov.il 

Respectfully,

Ishay Don Yehiya

Director, International Relations 

& Air Transport Division
#### Dyer & Gheesling *v.*Dyer.

May 15, 1912.

Claim. Before Judge Walker. Warren superior court. April 11, 1911.

*L. D. McGregor,*for plaintiffs in error. *M, L. Felts,*contra.

Beck, J.

M. A. Dyer and J. T. Gheesling were partners doing a mercantile business under the firm name of Dyer & Gheesling. The latter sold his entire interest in tl^e business and the firm assets to the other partner, it being stipulated that the purchaser of the retiring partner’s interest “is to pay the partnership debts.” Subsequently to the sale Dyer, the purchaser, executed a mortgage covering the entire stock of merchandise; and when this mortgage was foreclosed and the mortgage fi. fa. levied, Gheesling filed a claim thereto in the name of the former partnership, Dyer & Gheesling. *Held,*that the court, to whom the case was submitted under the law and the facts without the intervention of a jury, did not err in finding the property subject. Whether Gheesling could have maintained an equitable action or not, to compel the application of the assets to the payment of the firm debts, he could not maintain a claim in the name of the firm, although Dyer was insolvent and had not complied with his obligation to pay the firm debts.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 513.305 Causes for debarment. Debarment may be imposed in accordance with the provisions of §§ 513.300 through 513.314 for: ( a ) Conviction of or civil judgment for: ( 1 ) Commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public or private agreement or transaction;
( 2 ) Violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes, including those proscribing price fixing between competitors, allocation of customers between competitors, and bid rigging;
( 3 ) Commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, receiving stolen property, making false claims, or obstruction of justice; or
( 4 ) Commission of any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty that seriously and directly affects the present responsibility of a person.
( b ) Violation of the terms of a public agreement or transaction so serious as to affect the integrity of an agency program, such as: ( 1 ) A willful failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more public agreements or transactions;
( 2 ) A history of failure to perform or of unsatisfactory performance of one or more public agreements or transactions; or
( 3 ) A willful violation of a statutory or regulatory provision or requirement applicable to a public agreement or transaction.
( c ) Any of the following causes: ( 1 ) A nonprocurement debarment by any Federal agency taken before October 1, 1988, the effective date of these regulations, or a procurement debarment by any Federal agency taken pursuant to 48 CFR subpart 9.4;
( 2 ) Knowingly doing business with a debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded person, in connection with a covered transaction, except as permitted in § 513.215 or § 513.220;
( 3 ) Failure to pay a single substantial debt, or a number of outstanding debts (including disallowed costs and overpayments, but not including sums owed the Federal Government under the Internal Revenue Code) owed to any Federal agency or instrumentality, provided the debt is uncontested by the debtor or, if contested, provided that the debtor's legal and administrative remedies have been exhausted;
( 4 ) Violation of a material provision of a voluntary exclusion agreement entered into under § 513.315 or of any settlement of a debarment or suspension action; or
( 5 ) Violation of any requirement of subpart F of this part, relating to providing a drug-free workplace, as set forth in § 513.615 of this part.
( d ) Any other cause of so serious or compelling a nature that it affects the present responsibility of a person.
[53 FR 19179, 19204, May 26, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 4950, 4955, Jan. 31, 1989]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2596 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2596

 To suspend temporarily the duty on modified steel leaf spring leaves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

 Mr. Reichert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on modified steel leaf spring leaves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFIED STEEL LEAF SPRING LEAVES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.73.20       Leaf spring        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         leaves of alloy                                                    31/2009
                         steel of Japan
                         JIS grade SUP 10H
                         (SAE6150), each
                         measuring from
                         137 cm to 163 cm
                         in length and
                         approximately
                         10.2 cm in width
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         7320.10.60), the
                         foregoing
                         designed for
                         multi-leaf or
                         taper-leaf
                         construction
                         units, each leaf
                         weighing
                         approximately
                         from 41.7 kg to
                         89.4 kg, produced
                         using a patented
                         modified aus-
                         forming process
                         and designed for
                         use in Class 7
                         and 8 trucks only

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                         3279000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   688000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    3929000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8476000
<PP&E>                                        30062000
<DEPRECIATION>                                11866000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28060000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3024000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4385
<OTHER-SE>                                    14372000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28060000
<SALES>                                        7063000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7124000
<CGS>                                          4548000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4548000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1687000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              214000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 238000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     93000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             145000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    145000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD.,

Plaintiff,    v.

HECTOR ANTONIO ORELLANA, et al.,

Defendants/

No. C-09-0219 MMC

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TOSUBMIT COPY OF SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT; VACATING MARCH 5,2010 STATUS CONFERENCE

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal, filed February 26, 2010, by

which the parties stipulate that the above-titled action be dismissed and that the parties will

be subject to the Court’s jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement the parties have

reached.  The parties, however, have failed to submit a copy of their settlement agreement.

Accordingly, the parties are hereby DIRECTED to submit, no later than March 8,

2010, a copy of their settlement agreement.

Further, in light of the parties’ settlement, the March 5, 2010 Further Status

Conference is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  March 1, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00219-MMC   Document 32   Filed 03/01/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T03:19:57-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO