alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 710

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

#### § 710.6 Appointment and qualifications of examiner.

When a former DFC employee after receiving adequate notice requests a hearing, a presiding official (hereinafter referred to as “examiner”) shall be appointed by the President of DFC to make an initial decision. The examiner shall be a responsible person who is a member of the bar of a State or of the District of Columbia, who is impartial and who has not participated in any manner in the decision to initiate the proceedings. The examiner may or may not be an DFC employee.
(April 12, 1977)

#### Joyce Stratton, Appellant, v Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 15, 1976, and the judgment entered thereon on March 15, 1976, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Asch, J. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2580 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2580

 To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl-4-trifluoromethoxyphenyl-N-
                (chlorocarbonyl) carbamate (DPX-KL540).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl-4-trifluoromethoxyphenyl-N-
                (chlorocarbonyl) carbamate (DPX-KL540).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL-4-TRIFLUOROMETHOXYPHENYL-N-(CHLOROCARBONYL) CARBAMATE 
              (DPX-KL540).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl-4-
trifluoromethoxyphenyl-N-(chlorocarbonyl) carbamate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2003'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §6965. Chief Financial Officer report

The Chief Financial Officer of each affected agency shall submit to Congress an annual report containing, to the extent practicable, a detailed description of the compliance activities undertaken by the agency for mixed waste streams, and an accounting of the fines and penalties imposed on the agency for violations involving mixed waste.

(Pub. L. 102–386, title I, §110, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992, and not as part of the Solid Waste Disposal Act which comprises this chapter.
#### § 530.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the Board shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
### §§6839, 6840. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §101(a)(2), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2783

Section 6839, Pub. L. 94–385, title III, §310, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1149; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §§301(a), 304(a), title VII, §§703, 707, 709(e)(2), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 580, 606, 607, 608; Pub. L. 97–35, title X, §1041(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 621; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433, related to support activities necessary or appropriate to develop and implement voluntary performance standards.

Section 6840, Pub. L. 94–385, title III, §311, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1149; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, §207(b), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1824, related to monitoring of State and local adoption and implementation of standards and reports to Congress on implementation and effectiveness of standards.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Boise and Payette 
National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will 
conduct a business meeting, which is open to the public.

DATES: Wednesday, January 19, 2004, beginning at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South 
Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include review and 
approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dough Gochnour, Designated Federal 
Officer, at 208-392-6681 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#caaeada5a9a2a4a5bfb88aacb9e4acafaee4bfb9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6105060e02090f0e14132107124f0704054f1412">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Lana S. Thurston,
Administrative Officer, Boise National Forest.
[FR Doc. 04-27815 Filed 12-17-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

8/20/2012

Mr. David K. Paylor

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

Richmond, Virginia 23219

Dear Director Paylor:

On March 9, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

(VADEQ). The SIP revision addresses the infrastructure elements specified in section 110(a)(2)(A) 

through (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) which are necessary to implement, maintain, and enforce the 

2008 lead national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the Commonwealth of Virginia. EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare 

a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Melissa Linden, Office 

of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2096, or linden.melissa@epa.gov. She is the principal contact 

for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

 Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division 

 

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director

 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Attendee Name Company 

Location 

(City, State) Title Phone # E-Mail

Angus Crane NAIMA Alexandria, VA Vice President, Gen. Counsel 703-684-0084 acrane@naima.org

Granta Nakayama Kirkland & Ellis LLP Washington, DC Partner 202-879-5074 granta.nakayama@kirkland.com

Lee Houlditch Amerrock Products LP Nolanville, TX Owner/ CEO 205-516-9164 lhoulditch@amerrock.com

Joe Eisert Kirkland & Ellis LLP Washington, DC Partner 202-879-5136 joseph.eisert@kirkland.com

Tom Lund Isolatek International Huntington, IN Operations Manager 260-356-2040 tlund@isolatek.com

Gerald Miller Rock Wool Mfg Co. Leeds, AL Vice President Operations 205-699-6121 lgeraldmiller@gmail.com

Timothy Scott Rock Wool Mfg Co. Leeds, AL President 905-875-9307 leslie.maclaren@roxul.com

Steve Edris Thermafiber, Inc. Wabash, IN President & CEO 260-563-2111 sedris@Thermofiber.com

John Bolden USG Interiors Chicago, IL Env. Service Manager 312-823-6702 jbolden@usg.com

Christopher Bullock Ind. Insulation Group Phenix City, AL Vice President 205-603-8498 bullockc@iig-llc.com

Nancy Davis Rock Wool Mfg Co. Chapel Hill, NC General Counsel & V.P. 919-932-6672 nancyworth.davis@gmail.com

Michael McLaughlin Roxul, Inc. Milton, Canada Vice President Business Dev. 905-875-9353 michael.mclaughlin@roxul.com

Bent Jorgenson Roxul, Inc. Milton, Canada Vice President Operations 905-875-9304 bent.jorgensen@roxul.com

Susan Fairchild EPA - OAQPS - MMG RTP, NC Project Lead 919-541-5167 fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Winifred Okoye (via phone) EPA - OGC Washington, DC Attorney 202-564-5446 okoye.winifred@epa.gov

Keith Barnett EPA - OAQPS - MMG RTP, NC Metals & Mfg Group Leader 919-541-5605 barnett.keith@epa.gov

Steffan Johnson EPA - OAQPS - MPG RTP, NC Testing/Measurement 919-541-4790 johnson.steffan@epa.gov

Chris Sarsony EPA - OAQPS - ATAG RTP, NC Risk Assessment 919-541-4843 sarsony.chris@epa.gov

Dave Guinnup EPA - OAQPS - ATAG RTP, NC ATAG Group Leader 919-541-5368 guinnup.dave@epa.gov

Dave Reeves RTI RTP, NC EPA Contractor 919-316-3739 dwreeves@rti.org

Cindy Hancy (via phone) RTI RTP, NC EPA Contractor 919-541-6623 chancy@rti.org

EPA Meeting with NAIMA and Mineral Wool Production Industry Representatives on December 13, 2011
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00009

- CV

DENNIS RAYNER AND JOE TEX XPRESS, INC., Appellant

V.
KRISTA DILLON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 62nd District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. CV40921

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed March 11, 2015, and the reporter’s record was
filed June 17, 2015, making the appellants’ brief due July 17, 2015. After requesting and receiving
an extension of time, the appellants filed their brief August 17, 2015, making Dillon’s brief due
September 16, 2015. This deadline was extended twice by this Court on the motions of Dillon’s
counsel, resulting in the most recent due date of November 16, 2015. Counsel has now filed a
third motion seeking an extension of Dillon’s briefing deadline.

We have reviewed counsel’s third mot ion to extend time as well as the appellate record in
this case, and we find no compelling information to convince us that a third extension of the filing

deadline is warranted

. Consequently, counsel’s third motion to extend time to file Dillon’s
appellat e brief is overruled.

We order counsel to file Dillon’s appellat e brief with this Court on or before December 7,

201 5

.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: November 17, 2015
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

KRISTA O’DONOVAN

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CASHCALL INC.

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 08-03174 MEJ

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES IN

COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL

ORDER 45 AND THE COURT'S

STANDING ORDERS

On July 8 ,2010, Plaintiff electronically filed a reply and supporting documents. (Dkt. ##87-

89.) However, Plaintiff has failed to comply with General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders

by failing to deliver to the Clerk’s Office “no later than noon on the business day following the day

that the papers are filed electronically, one paper copy of each document that is filed electronically .

. . marked ‘Chambers Copy’ and . . . clearly marked with the judge’s name, case number, and

‘Chambers Copy-Do Not File.’” See General Order 45 § VI.G; see also Case Management Standing

Order, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, ¶ 6. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to comply with

General Order 45 and the Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy,

with exhibits and appropriate tab dividers if necessary, of the above-referenced documents. 

ALL CHAMBERS COPIES OF ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS MUST

INCLUDE ON EACH PAGE THE RUNNING HEADER CREATED BY THE ECF

SYSTEM. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 17, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-03174-TSH Document 92 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Clarence E. Decker, Individually and as Executor of William H. Decker, Deceased, et al., Respondents, v. The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of a Special Term, County Court, Sullivan County. Order reversed and complaint dismissed, without costs. (See *Schulman*v. *People,*11 A D 2d 273.) Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Herlihy, J., dissents and votes to affirm. (See dissenting memorandum in *Schulman*v. *People,*11 A D 2d 273.) [23 Misc 2d 90.]
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

#### § 17.71 Request for hearing.

The debtor shall file a request for a hearing with the OHA at the address specified in the notice or at such other address as the OHA may direct in writing to the debtor.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:56:50-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernard Hubbard, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated December 6, 1961, which denied, without a hearing, his application to vacate a judgment of said court rendered November 19, 1962 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, unarmed, and sentencing him as a second felony offender. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Dean F. Pietropolo, Appellant, v New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development et al., Respondents.

[836 NYS2d 16]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered May 4, 2006, which dismissed this proceeding challenging a determination of respondent Department of Housing Preservation and Development denying succession rights to petitioner and issuing a certificate of eviction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner did not sustain his burden of establishing his entitlement to succession rights to his sister’s apartment was not affected by an error of law, and was not irrational, unreasonable, or arbitrary and capricious (CPLR 7803 [3]; *Matter of Consolation Nursing Home v Commissioner of N.Y. State Dept. of Health,*85 NY2d 326, 331 [1995]).

Petitioner’s inclusion in income affidavits did not, in and of *407itself, establish his entitlement to succession rights as a matter of law. In order to succeed to leasehold rights in this Mitchell-Lama apartment pursuant to 28 RCNY 3-02 (p) (3), petitioner bore the burden of establishing that he resided there with his sister, as a primary residence *(see*28 RCNY 3-02 [n] [4]), for two years immediately prior to her permanent departure *(see Matter of Alfred v Barrios-Paoli,*251 AD2d 659, 660 [1998]), and appeared on the income affidavits for at least two consecutive annual reporting periods prior to her departure. While petitioner claims that his sister left in November 2000, his 2000 income affidavit identified petitioner as the sole occupant, and no objective documentary evidence (e.g., income tax returns, W-2 forms, driver’s license or bank statements) was submitted to substantiate that the apartment remained the sister’s primary residence until November 2000. The income affidavits and certain other submissions did support petitioner’s claim of residency, but they were inconsistent with his 1998 and 1999 tax returns, W-2 forms and bank statements that showed a Dutchess County address. Significantly, petitioner stated in his 1999 New York City Non-Resident Tax Return that he did not maintain an apartment or live in the City for any part of that year *(see e.g. Gottlieb v Licursi,*191 AD2d 256 [1993]).

Petitioner was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. The regulation under which he claimed succession rights (28 RCNY 3-02 [p]) did not provide for a hearing. Petitioner utilized the statutory protections and was afforded all the due process to which he was entitled under the circumstances (28 RCNY 3-02 [p] [8] [ii]; *see generally Matter of Cadman Plaza N. v New York City Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*290 AD2d 344 [2002]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
### §5028a. Prohibition

The Director may not reduce the activities, projects, or volunteers funded under the other parts of this subchapter in order to support projects under this part.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title II, §232, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §351, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 907.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 392 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 4951 of this title.
69–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–435 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 3222) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 

2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 806] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 806, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report on H.R. 3222, the Department of Defense Appropriations 

Act, 2008, and against its consideration and provides that the conference report shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clauses 8 and 9 

of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports 

and the accompanying joint explanatory statement and precluding 

conferees from including matter outside the scope of conference); 

includes a waiver of section 302 of the Congressional Budget Act 

for a breach of the Defense subcommittee 302(b) allocation; and includes a waiver of section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act for 

provisions within the jurisdiction of the Committee on the Budget 

on a bill that has not been reported by that committee. 

Although the rule waives all points of order against the conference report and against its consideration, the conference report 

does not violate either House Resolution 491 or clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI (requiring earmarks to be disclosed in the conference reVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:34 Nov 08, 2007 Jkt 069008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR435.XXX HR435

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMRPT
2 

port and requiring conference reports to be in compliance with the 

PAYGO rule). 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMRPT
#### The People of the State of New York v. Michael Kane.

Enlargements of time granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division 

      ( print page 76479)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 8, 2004, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Electronic Distributors Association (“NEDA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                 

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: National Electronic Distributors Association, Alpharetta, GA. The nature and scope of NEDA's standards development activities are: establishing and publishing voluntary standards related to packaging, handling, labeling, shipping and tracking products and operational agreements between business partners in the electronic component supply chain. 

Dorothy B. Fountain, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. 

[FR Doc. 04-27873 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
### §3796ii. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ii was editorially reclassified as section 10471 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Study on Reentry, Mental Illness, and Public Safety

Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11011, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1823, directed the Attorney General to commission a study of offenders with mental illness released from prison or jail to determine the extent to which participation in public benefit programs correlates with successful reentry and improved public safety.