alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6232. Definitions

As used in this part and part C:

(1) Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(5)(A), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2029.

(2) The term "importer" means any person who owns, at the first place of storage, any petroleum product imported into the United States.

(3) Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(5)(A), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2029.

(4) The term "interest in land" means any ownership or possessory right with respect to real property, including ownership in fee, an easement, a leasehold, and any subsurface or mineral rights.

(5) The term "readily available inventories" means stocks and supplies of petroleum products which can be distributed or used without affecting the ability of the importer or refiner to operate at normal capacity; such term does not include minimum working inventories or other unavailable stocks.

(6) The term "refiner" means any person who owns, operates, or controls the operation of any refinery.

(7) Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(5)(A), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2029.

(8) The term "related facility" means any necessary appurtenance to a storage facility, including pipelines, roadways, reservoirs, and salt brine lines.

(9) The term "Reserve" means the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

(10) The term "storage facility" means any facility or geological formation which is capable of storing significant quantities of petroleum products.

(11) The term "Strategic Petroleum Reserve" means petroleum products stored in storage facilities pursuant to this part.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §152, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 882; Pub. L. 101–383, §6(a)(1), Sept. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(5), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2029.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Par. (1). Pub. L. 106–469, §103(5)(A), struck out par. (1) which read as follows: "The term 'Early Storage Reserve' means that portion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve which consists of petroleum products stored pursuant to section 6235 of this title."

Par. (3). Pub. L. 106–469, §103(5)(A), struck out par. (3) which read as follows: "The term 'Industrial Petroleum Reserve' means that portion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve which consists of petroleum products owned by importers or refiners and acquired, stored, or maintained pursuant to section 6236 of this title."

Par. (7). Pub. L. 106–469, §103(5)(A), struck out par. (7) which read as follows: "The term 'Regional Petroleum Reserve' means that portion of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve which consists of petroleum products stored pursuant to section 6237 of this title."

Par. (11). Pub. L. 106–469, §103(5)(B), struck out "; such term includes the Industrial Petroleum Reserve, the Early Storage Reserve, and the Regional Petroleum Reserve" before period at end.

1990—Pub. L. 101–383 inserted "and part C" after "this part".
#### Anthony Lombard et al., Respondents, v. Richard C. Hastings, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion granted, without costs. Memorandum: Under the facts and circumstances disclosed by the record herein, the refusal of the Trial Justice to grant the examination requested was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term denying motion by defendant for further physical examination of plaintiff Mary Lombard before trial.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 308]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ308.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 1077]]

Public Law 106-308
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in 
         Jackson, Wyoming, as the ``Clifford P. Hansen Federal 
           Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2000 -  [S. 1794]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CLIFFORD P. HANSEN FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in Jackson, 
Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the ``Clifford P. Hansen 
Federal Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal courthouse referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clifford P. Hansen 
Federal Courthouse''.

    Approved October 13, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1794:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-828 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):
            Mar. 2, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 2, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 75012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26136]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK


Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice of an Open Meeting of the Board of 
Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, December 10, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via teleconference.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to public observation by 
teleconference only.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. Review of EXIM's Medium- and Long-Term (MLT) Reachback Policy
2. Local Cost Support for Short Term (ST) Insurance and Working Capital 
Transactions

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joyce B. Stone (202-257-4086). 
Members of the public who wish to attend the meeting via audio only 
teleconference should register via https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/7605082646858648589 by noon Wednesday, December 9, 2020. 
Individuals will be directed to a Webinar registration page and 
provided call-in information.

Joyce B. Stone,
Assistant Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26136 Filed 11-20-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.855 [Reserved]
#### Eric L. TOLBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor LIGHTSEY; Earl V. Echard; Nurse Craig; Nurse Snider, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-7965.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2007.

Decided: May 2, 2007.

Eric L. Tolbert, Appellant pro se. Elizabeth P. McCullough, Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth F. Parsons, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric L. Tolbert appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Tolbert’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Tolbert v. Lightsey,*No. 5:05-ct-00428-BO (E.D.N.C. Sep. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[4910-I3-P) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 fOocket No. FAA-2009-0914; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-122-AD; Amendme 

# \fu,2>OL\ -')0\0-ID-')5 39-""'****; AD **'A_**_**] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 an -300 Series Airplanes, and 

# ::qe/lcJ
~OlmN(1snlBOL 

# ~AE6- Model A340-300 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransponation (DOT).

""~"MOOL abasic wire harness In the door 2 area, the hat-racks are supplied wit which includes "Oxygen Masks" activation. Incase ofa monument installation, the respective non-used hat-rack connections between monument and outer skin ire put on stow. Itwas noticed inproduction, that the distance between the stowed wire harness and the monument could be too small. This condition, ifnot corrected, could lead to the short circuit ofwires dedicatedfo oxygen, which, incase ofemergency, could result in a large number of ~assenger oxygen masks not being supplied with oxygen, possibly causing personal injuries. ACTION: Final rule. 

### L-'~ 'U 

## 'f/ o

# '1? SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness dir1ctive (AD) for the products lis II >lG $YMOOL 

### ,VI"

- 

## IIe.-{ above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airwrrthillcss infomlation (MeAn "'In IS onginated by an aVIatIOnauthority of another countr~ t1 identIfy and correct an unsafe

# "'5 Lf

# I to condlllOn on an avIation product. Thc MeAl descnbJs the unsafe condition as. ·"'IINGS\'M[<QI. ( I "L ,",,'fA - 10



# "n~,(~

* * 

### * 

## * * * * ""
#### Roy V. Hoffman *et al.*v. Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County.

(Filed Feb. 11, 1899.)

1. *Appeal*— Time *of Taking.*Under section 574 of our Civil Code, proceedings for reversing, vaca *ting or*modifying judgment or final orders must be commenced in the supreme court within one year after the rendition of the judgment or making of the final order which is- sought to be reviewed by this court, unless the person entitled to such proceeding be under disability, as provided in said section.

•2. *Same*— No *Jurisdiction After One Year.*Where more than one year has intervened between the rendition of the judgment or final order sought to be reviewed and the filing of the petition in error in the supreme court, this court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the court, and the petition in error must therefore be dismissed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

*Error from the Probate Court of Paionee County; before James P. Neal, Probate Judge.*

*John F. Stone*and *A. J. Biddison,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Eagleton & MorpMs, for*defendant in error.

Action (by Roy V. Hoffman and William Blincoe •against the board of county commissioners of Pawnee county. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring ■error.

Dismissed.

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

This cause comes here on appeal from the probate court of Pawnee county. It appears from the record in this case that the cause was tried by the court *226without a jury, aud that the court rendered a judgment in said cause on the 31st day of August, 1897. It further appears from the record that on the 31st day of August a motion for a new trial was filed by the plaintiff, which motion, on the same day, was considered and overruled by the court, to which ruling of the court the plaintiff duly excepted at the time, and brings the case here on a case-made for review. It further appears that the case was settled and signed by the probate judge on the 5th day of July, 1898. It further appears that the case was not filed in this court until the 30th day of September, 1898.

Section 574 of the Civil Code provides: “No proceeding for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced unless within one year after the rendition of the judgment or making of the final order complained of, or in case the person entitled to such proceeding be an infant, a person of unsound mind, or imprisoned within one year as aforesaid, exclusive of the time of such disability.” Thus the record in this case clearly shows that more than one year has intervened between the rendition of the judgment and the overruling of the motion for a new trial in the probate court and the filing of the petition in error and the case-made in this court; hence this court is without jurisdiction to review such judgment. The petition in error must therefore be dismissed.

All of the Justices concurring.
#### In the Matter of Francis E. Ferro, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[718 NYS2d 221]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1972. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Town of Marlborough, Ulster County.

Respondent is also a member of the Florida Bar. Pursuant to an order of the Florida Supreme Court, respondent was publicly reprimanded in that State on September 7, 2000, for having been found in criminal contempt of court on September 3, 1999, by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. According to the written public reprimand, the conduct giving rise to the contempt citation involved respondent’s failure to obey the court’s order to pay costs and attorneys fees for failure to make discovery, and failure to attend hearings and show cause why he should not be held in contempt. The District Court sentenced respondent to perform 60 hours of community service which he completed at the New Paltz Youth Center in Ulster County. Although the District Court found that respondent had willfully failed to pay the sanctions, it chose not to adjudicate respondent in criminal contempt of court for nonpayment, noting that respondent had filed a petition in bankruptcy.

Petitioner moves to reciprocally discipline respondent (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has filed a verified statement in response which sets forth relevant circumstances but which does not establish any of the defenses to reciprocal discipline (see, 22 NYCRR 806.19 [c]).

We grant petitioner’s motion and conclude that the ends of justice will be served by imposing upon respondent the same discipline in this State as was imposed in Florida, namely a censure (see, *e.g., Matter of Spain,*261 AD2d 64; *Matter of Carney,*212 AD2d 956).

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is censured.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedur e.

NO. COA 13

- 1233 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 6 May 2014

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. Stokes County No s . 12 CRS 50761

- 66, 50768 CHARLES JUSTIN BOOTHE

Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 8 August 2013 by Judge A. Moses Massey in Stokes County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 7 April 2014
. Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General David L. Gore, III, for the State.
Jon W. Myers for defendant

- appellant.

ELMORE , Judge.
On 10 October 2013, pursuant to a plea agreement, Charles Justin Boothe ( defendant ) pleaded guilty to six counts of breaking and/or entering a motor vehicle, one count of breaking and/or entering, one count of possession of stolen goods, one count of larceny of a motor vehicle, six counts of injury to personal property, one count of inju ry to real property, and one count of first

- degree trespass. The charges were consolidated- 2
-

into two judgments and the trial court sentenced defendant to consecutive active terms of eleven to twenty

- three months imprisonment and eight to nineteen months im prisonment. The trial court also ordered defendant to pay restitution in the amount of $4,500.00. Defendant gave n otice of appeal in open
court. On appeal, defendant argues the trial court erred in ordering payment of a restitution amount not supported by competent evidence. We agree. “[T]he amount of restitution recommended by the trial court must be supported by evidence adduced at trial or at sentencing.” State v. Wilson , 340 N.C. 720, 726, 459 S.E.2d 192, 196 (1995) (citation omitted). In the pres ent case , the prosecutor stated that the victims indicated “there’s 3,500 in damages that’ s not covered by insurance a nd they had a $1,000 deductible,” and “we’ re looking at about $4,500 covering restitution. ” However, review of the record reveals that no evidence was presented which supports the figure offered by the
State. This Court has held that the “[u] nsworn statements of a prosecutor, standing alone, cannot support an award of restitution. ” State v. McNeil , 209 N.C. App. 654 , 668, 707- 3
-

S.E.2d 674, 684 ( 2011) (citing State v. Buchanan , 108 N.C. App. 338, 341

- 42, 423 S.E.2d 819, 821 (1992) )
. Further, t he State ’s argument that defendant’s silence or lack of objection to the presentation of the restitution worksheet constitutes a stipulation to the re stitution amount is without merit
. See State v. Mauer , 202 N.C. App. 546, 552, 688 S.E.2d 774, 778 (2010) (holding defendant’s silence does not constitute a stipulation to the amount of restitution). Accordingly, t he restitution portion of the judgment m ust be vacated and remanded to the trial court for redetermination.
R emanded for redetermination of restitution
. Judges Mc GEE and DAVIS concur . Report per Rule 30(e).
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Consolidated Avionics Corporation, Appellant, and Sem Company, Respondent. Consolidated Avionics Corporation, Appellant, v. Sem Company, Respondent.

Motions for a stay pending appeal denied, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### § 100.200 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to effectuate sections 6 (a) and (b) and 15 of the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.161 Administration of debenture transactions.

The Secretary of the Treasury or the Acting Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and empowered, on behalf of the Commissioner, to administer the regulations governing any transactions and operations in debentures, to do all things necessary to conduct such transactions and operations, and to delegate such authority at his discretion to other officers, employees, and agents of the U.S. Treasury Department. At his discretion the Secretary, the Under Secretary, or any Assistant Secretary of the Treasury acting by direction of the Secretary, is authorized to waive any such regulation on behalf of the Commissioner in any particular case where a similar regulation of the Treasury Department with respect to United States bonds or interest thereon would be waived.
#### § 1000.40 Do lead-based paint poisoning prevention requirements apply to affordable housing activities under NAHASDA?

Yes, lead-based paint requirements apply to housing activities assisted under NAHASDA. The applicable requirements for NAHASDA are HUD's regulations at part 35, subparts A, B, H, J, K, M and R of this title, which implement the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4822-4846) and the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4851-4856).

[64 FR 50230, Sept. 15, 1999; 65 FR 3387, Jan. 21, 2000]
§ 521.47 Limitations. ( a ) The notice of hearing with respect to a claim or statement must be served in the manner specified in § 521.8 within 6 years after the date on which such claim or statement is made.
( b ) If the defendant fails to file a timely answer, service of a notice under § 521.10(b) shall be deemed notice of hearing for purposes of this section.
( c ) The statute of limitations may be extended by agreement of the parties.
PUBLIC LAW 106–308—OCT. 13, 2000 114 STAT. 1077

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1794:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–828 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: Vol. 146 (2000):

Mar. 2, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 2, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 106–308

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in Jackson,

Wyoming, as the ‘‘Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CLIFFORD P. HANSEN FEDERAL COURTHOUSE.

The Federal courthouse at 145 East Simpson Avenue in Jackson, Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Clifford

P. Hansen Federal Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Clifford P. Hansen Federal Courthouse’’.

Approved October 13, 2000.

Oct. 13, 2000

[S. 1794]
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 87 FR 8196, Feb. 14, 2022.

§ 17.67 Review of departmental records related to the debt. ( a ) *Notification by the debtor.* A debtor who intends to inspect or copy departmental records related to the debt pursuant to 31 CFR 901.3 must, within 20 calendar days after the date of the notice in § 17.65, send a letter to HUD, at the address indicated in the notice of intent to offset, stating his or her intention. A debtor may also request, within 20 calendar days from the date of such notice, that HUD provide the debtor with a copy of departmental records related to the debt.
( b ) *HUD's response.* In response to a timely notification by the debtor as described in paragraph (a) of this section, HUD shall notify the debtor of the location and the time when the debtor may inspect or copy departmental records related to the debt. If the debtor requests that HUD provide a copy of departmental records related to the debt, HUD shall send the records to the debtor within 10 calendar days from the date that HUD receives the debtor's request. HUD may charge the debtor a reasonable fee to compensate for the cost of providing a copy of the departmental records related to the debt.
PRIVATE LAW 106–6—OCT. 10, 2000

Private Law 106–6

106th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Akal Security, Incorporated.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES PERFORMED BUT NOT PAID.

Notwithstanding section 2465 of title 10, United States Code,

the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in

the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to Akal Security, Incorporated, a New Mexico corporation incorporated in New Mexico,

$10,208.74 for security guard services rendered in 1991 to the

United States Army Reserve Personnel Center located at 9700

Page Boulevard in St. Louis, Missouri.

SEC. 2. EXTINGUISHMENT OF LIABILITY.

Notwithstanding section 2465 of title 10, United States Code,

any liability of Akal Security, Incorporated, to the United States

for repayment of $57,771.29 for the services described in section

1 is hereby extinguished.

SEC. 3. FULL SATISFACTION.

The relief under sections 1 and 2 shall, when accepted by

or on behalf of Akal Security, Incorporated, be in full satisfaction

of all claims of or on behalf of Akal Security, Incorporated, against

the United States or against any officer, employee, or agent of

the United States acting within the scope of employment or agency,

for payment for the services described in section 1.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 percent of

the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or received

by, any agent or attorney for any service rendered in connection

with the claim described in such section. Any person who violates

this section shall be guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject

to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States Code.

Oct. 10, 2000

[H.R. 3363]