alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6992f. Relationship to State law

#### (a) State inspections and enforcement

A State may conduct inspections under 1 6992c of this title and take enforcement actions under section 6992d of this title against any person, including any person who has imported medical waste into a State in violation of the requirements of, or regulations under, this subchapter, to the same extent as the Administrator. At the time a State initiates an enforcement action under section 6992d of this title against any person, the State shall notify the Administrator in writing.

#### (b) Retention of State authority

Nothing in this subchapter shall—

(1) preempt any State or local law; or

(2) except as provided in subsection (c), otherwise affect any State or local law or the authority of any State or local government to adopt or enforce any State or local law.

#### (c) State forms

Any State or local law which requires submission of a tracking form from any person subject to this subchapter shall require that the form be identical in content and format to the form required under section 6992b of this title, except that a State may require the submission of other tracking information which is supplemental to the information required on the form required under section 6992b of this title through additional sheets or such other means as the State deems appropriate.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §11007, as added Pub. L. 100–582, §2(a), Nov. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2955.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "under section".
#### § 110.15 Location of posters.

All fair housing posters shall be prominently displayed so as to be readily apparent to all persons seeking housing accommodations or seeking to engage in residential real estate-related transactions or brokerage services as contemplated by sections 804 through 806 of the Act.

[54 FR 3311, Jan. 23, 1989]
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.18 Minimum loan prohibition.

A mortgagee may not require that the mortgage exceed a minimum amount established by the mortgagee, as a condition of providing a loan secured by a mortgage insured under this part.
### §7261c. Technology partnerships ombudsman

#### (a) Appointment of ombudsman

The Secretary of Energy shall direct the director of each national laboratory of the Department of Energy, and may direct the director of each facility under the jurisdiction of the Department of Energy, to appoint a technology partnership ombudsman to hear and help resolve complaints from outside organizations regarding the policies and actions of each such laboratory or facility with respect to technology partnerships (including cooperative research and development agreements), patents, and technology licensing.

#### (b) Qualifications

An ombudsman appointed under subsection (a) shall be a senior official of the national laboratory or facility who is not involved in day-to-day technology partnerships, patents, or technology licensing, or, if appointed from outside the laboratory or facility, function as such a senior official.

#### (c) Duties

Each ombudsman appointed under subsection (a) shall—

(1) serve as the focal point for assisting the public and industry in resolving complaints and disputes with the national laboratory or facility regarding technology partnerships, patents, and technology licensing;

(2) promote the use of collaborative alternative dispute resolution techniques such as mediation to facilitate the speedy and low-cost resolution of complaints and disputes, when appropriate; and

(3) report quarterly on the number and nature of complaints and disputes raised, along with the ombudsman's assessment of their resolution, consistent with the protection of confidential and sensitive information, to—

(A) the Secretary;

(B) the Administrator for Nuclear Security;

(C) the Director of the Office of Dispute Resolution of the Department of Energy; and

(D) the employees of the Department responsible for the administration of the contract for the operation of each national laboratory or facility that is a subject of the report, for consideration in the administration and review of that contract.

(Pub. L. 106–404, §11, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1749.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Technology Transfer Commercialization Act of 2000, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,823
<INVENTORY>                                     12,636
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,531
<PP&E>                                          56,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                    (30,662)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,063
<SALES>                                        167,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,675
<CGS>                                          160,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       899
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,917)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,858)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.44)


</TABLE>
### §§7001 to 7011. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §143(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2843

Section 7001, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §502, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 191, related to congressional declaration and statement of purposes.

Section 7002, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §503, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 192, provided for establishment of Energy Extension Service.

Section 7003, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §504, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 192, provided for development and implementation of comprehensive program.

Section 7004, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §505, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 193, provided for initial implementation of State energy extension service plans.

Section 7005, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §506, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 195, provided for national implementation of State energy extension service plans.

Section 7006, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §507, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 198, related to administration of Energy Extension Service.

Section 7007, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §508, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 199, related to energy education, extension, and information.

Section 7008, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §509, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 199, provided for establishment of National Energy Extension Service Advisory Board.

Section 7009, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §511, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 201, related to records.

Section 7010, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §512, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 201, related to authorization of appropriations.

Section 7011, Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §513, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 202, set out definitions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–39, title V, §501, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 191, which provided that this title, which enacted this chapter and amended sections 5813 and 5818 of this title, could be cited as the "National Energy Extension Service Act", was repealed by Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §143(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2843.
#### Mike Murgic, appellee, v. Fort Dearborn Casualty Underwriters, appellant.

Assumpsit on policy of automobile insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. William F. Borders, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

William P. Launtz and Murphy O. Tate, for appellant. Beasley & Zulley, for, appellee.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Lauraine Sheehan et al., Appellants, v J.J. Stevens & Co., Inc., Respondent.

[833 NYS2d 237]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), entered January 25, 2006, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant property owner who moves for summary judgment in a premises liability case has the initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that it neither created the defective condition nor had actual or constructive notice of the condition for a sufficient length of time to discover and remedy it *(see Solomon v Loszynski,*21 AD3d 366 [2005]; *McKeon v Town of Oyster Bay,*292 AD2d 574 [2002]; *Abrams v Powerhouse Gym Merrick,*284 AD2d 487 [2001]). Only after the defendant has satisfied this threshold burden will the court examine the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition *(see Joachim v 1824 Church Ave., Inc.,*12 AD3d 409 [2004]). Here, the defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence sufficient to demonstrate that it neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged defective condition, *623namely, the gap between the cushion seat and the frame of the chair which caused the plaintiff Lauraine Sheehan to sustain injuries. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Romano v Stanley,*90 NY2d 444, 452 [1997]; *Martinez v Roberts Consol. Indus.,*299 AD2d 399 [2002]; *cf. Currado v Waldbaum, Inc.,*303 AD2d 442, 443 [2003]; *Dawson v National Amusements,*259 AD2d 329 [1999]; *Albergo v Deer Park Meat Farms,*138 AD2d 656 [1988]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Laurence Lublin, Appellant, v Central Islip Psychiatric Center, Respondent.

Appeal by petitioner from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated January 8, 1976, which denied his application for a conditional release from the Central Islip Psychiatric *988Center on the ground that he had failed to prove by a fair preponderance of the evidence that he could be released without danger to himself or others (see CPL 330.20, subd 3). By order dated January 24, 1977, this court .reversed the order, holding that the burden of proof should have been placed on the commissioner and remanded the proceeding to the County Court for further proceedings. On December 19, 1977 the Court of Appeals reversed the order of this court, held that the burden of proof had been properly placed on petitioner, and remitted the proceeding to this court for a review of the facts *(Matter of Lublin v Central Islip Psychiatric Center,*43 NY2d 341, revg 56 AD2d 1).* Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The findings of the County Court are supported by the evidence. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone, Shapiro and Margett, JJ., concur. [85 Misc 2d 48.]

*

 The order of this court also disposed of four other orders of the County Court; those orders are not presently before this court.
§ 115.309 Subcontracting under the FHAP. If an agency subcontracts to a public or private organization any activity for which the organization will receive FHAP funds, the agency must ensure and certify in writing that the organization is: ( a ) Using services, facilities, and electronic information technologies that are accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) (42 U.S.C. 12101), Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 701), and Section 508(a)(1) of the Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1998;
( b ) Complying with the standards of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1441);
( c ) Affirmatively furthering fair housing in the provision of housing and housing-related services; and
( d ) Not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal debarment or agency.
### §9809. Statement of purpose

It is the purpose of this part to meet the special economic needs of rural communities or areas with concentrations or substantial numbers of low-income persons by providing support to self-help programs which promote economic development and independence, as a supplement to existing similar programs conducted by other departments and agencies of the Federal Government. Such programs should encourage low-income families to pool their talents and resources so as to create and expand rural economic enterprise.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §620, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 493.)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2764 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2764

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2 methyl 5 
                       nitrobenzenesulfonic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2 methyl 5 
                       nitrobenzenesulfonic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2 METHYL 5 NITROBENZENESULFONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2 methyl 5 
nitrobenzenesulfonic acid) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 5986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2800]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act; Farm Credit Administration Board; Special Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the special meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

Date and Time: The special meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
February 10, 2004, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the 
Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

     January 8, 2004 (Open and Closed)

B. Reports

     Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Update
     Preferred Stock Informational Memorandum
     Syndications--OGC Legal Opinion

C. New Business--Other

     Webcast of FCA Public Meetings
     EEO Director Position
     Consolidation of FCA Training Programs
     Distressed Loan Restructuring--Final Rule
     Privacy Act--Routine Uses

Closed Session*

Reports

     East Carolina Preferred Stock Issuance Request
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ Session Closed--Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8) 
and (9).

    Dated: February 4, 2004.
Jeanette C. Brinkley,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 04-2800 Filed 2-5-04; 11:20 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
-1-

2267.000/442449.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC

Case No. C09-00350-MMC

Sean Reis (SBN 184044)

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP

30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

949-459-2124 (phone)

949-459-2123 (fax)

sreis@edelson.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

(Additional counsel appear on the signature page)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE CITIBANK HELOC REDUCTION

LITIGATION

Case No. C 09-0350 MMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO

CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

Amended Complaint filed: May 24, 2010

The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation and Request To Continue Case

Management Conference, hereby ORDERS that the Case Management Conference on the Court

calendar for July 16, 2010 is continued until August 6, 2010 and a Joint Case Management

Statement shall be filed on or before July 30, 2010. Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss by July 19, 2010, and Defendant shall file its Reply Brief by July

27, 2010.

DATED: July ___, 2010

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney

United States District Judge

September 10,

September 3,

12 /s/ Charles R. Breyer for

Case 3:09-cv-00350-MMC Document 104 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28130]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 122004C]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Weather Modification Activities Reports.
    Form Number(s): NOAA Forms 17-4, 17-4A, 17-4B.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0025.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 330.
    Number of Respondents: 55.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes for Forms 17-4 and 17-4A; 5 
hours for Form 17-4B.
    Needs and Uses: The Weather Modification Activities Reports are 
required by Public Law 92-205, Section 6(b). All entities which engage 
in weather modification (e.g. cloud-seeding to enhance precipitation or 
disperse fog) are required to report various data to NOAA. NOAA 
maintains the data for use in scientific research, historical 
statistics, international reports, and other purposes.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations; 
individuals or households; not-for-profit institutions; Federal 
government; State, local or tribal government.
    Frequency: On occasion, annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f0b2716010a042f0b000c41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="395d7140575c52795d565a175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b7f5a4d525f646954484f505e497b545659155e544b155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d296b3a4bbb68d80bda1a6b9b7a092bdbfb0fcb7bda2fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 17, 2004.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-28130 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KD-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### George B. Perabean, appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 27,718.

Suit for damages for personal injuries caused by street ear striking mail wagon driven by plaintiff and throwing him onto the pavement. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo Pam, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Rehearing denied July 6, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Charles Be Roy Brown, for appellants; John R. Guilliams, Frank L. Kriete and Franklin B. Hussey, of counsel. Jame? C. MeShane, for appellee.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.