alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2700 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 7-[(5-chloro2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[ (4-methoxy-2- 

sulfophenyl)azo]-, sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Naphthalenesulfonic 

acid, 7-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[ (4-methoxy-2-sulfophenyl)azo]-, sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-NAPHTHALENESULFONIC ACID, 7-[(5-CHLORO4 2,6-DIFLUORO-4-PYRIMIDINYL)AMINO]-4-HY5 DROXY-3-[(4-METHOXY-2-SULFOPHENYL)AZO]-, 

6 SODIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
2 

•HR 2700 IH 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.04 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 

7-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoro-4- 

pyrimidinyl)amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[(4-methoxy-2- 

sulfophenyl)azo]-, sodium 

salt. (CAS No. 85391–83–9) 

(provided for in subheading 

3204.16.20) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §7264. Seal of Department

The Secretary shall cause a seal of office to be made for the Department of such design as he shall approve and judicial notice shall be taken of such seal.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §654, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 602.)
Director Compensation Summary



  
 Exhibit 10.1

 EAGLE MATERIALS INC. 
 Non-Employee Directors — Compensation Summary 
 Effective August 2010
to July 2011 
 On an annual basis, each non-employee director of Eagle Materials Inc. (the “Company”) may select
one of the following compensation packages for his or her performance of director services during the next 12 months: 
  

	 	(1)	total annual compensation valued at $150,000, of which $75,000 is paid in cash and the remainder is provided in the form of an equity grant valued at $75,000; or


  

	 	(2)	an equity grant valued at $170,000. 

 The equity grant under either alternative is comprised of options to purchase common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 (“Common Stock”). In accordance with the terms of the Eagle Materials
Inc. Incentive Plan (as in effect on the date of grant), the exercise price of the stock options is set at the average of the high and low price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant. The number of option shares
granted is determined as of the date of the grant by using the Black-Scholes method. All options are fully exercisable when granted and have a seven-year term. 
 Non-employee directors who chair committees of the Board of Directors receive additional annual compensation. The Governance Committee Chair receives a fee of $10,000 per year. The chairs of the Audit
Committee and the Compensation Committee each receive a fee of $15,000 per year. The Chairman of the Board of Directors receives a fee $50,000 per year. Chairpersons who elect to receive all Board compensation in the form of equity may also elect to
receive this additional compensation in the form of options to purchase Common Stock, in which case a 26.67% premium is added to such fees when valuing the number of options to be received by such chairperson. 

If directors hold restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted as part of director compensation in prior fiscal years (which
includes all directors other than Richard Stewart), these directors will receive dividend equivalent units as and when the Company issues a cash dividend on the Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the RSUs. 

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses of attending meetings.
Employment Letter Agreement- David F. DeVoe



  
 Exhibit 10.2

 August 2, 2010 
 David F.
DeVoe 
 Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
 News Corporation 
 1211 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10036 
 Dear Dave: 

This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) is intended to constitute a formal binding modification to your agreement dated as of
November 15, 2004, with News America Incorporated, a wholly owned subsidiary of News Corporation (“NAI”), as amended on December 16, 2008 (the “Agreement”) and shall confirm the terms and conditions which will apply to
your Agreement as from November 14, 2009. All conditions set forth in the Agreement and in the letter agreement between you and News Corporation (the “Company”) dated August 2, 2010 regarding the annual bonus and long-term
incentive awards that you are eligible to receive (the “Annual Bonus and LTIP Letter Agreement”) remain applicable unless otherwise amended by the terms and conditions outlined below. 

NAI and you agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. Term of Employment. Section 2 of the Agreement states that the Term of Employment shall mean the period from November 15, 2004 through November 14, 2009. NAI and you hereby agree
to extend the Term of Employment for a period of five years such that the Term of Employment shall mean the period through November 14, 2014. 
 2. Other Benefits. Section 5(a)(i) of the Agreement states that you shall be entitled to participate in any stock option or purchase plan, stock appreciation rights plan or any bonus or other
compensation plan applicable to senior executives of the Company, NAI or Fox Entertainment Group. NAI and you here by agree that any long-term incentive awards that you may be eligible to receive shall be governed by the terms set forth in the
Annual Bonus and LTIP Letter Agreement. 
 3. Signing Bonus. Subject to the your execution of this Letter Agreement, on
August 6, 2010, you shall receive cash-settled restricted stock units (the “Bonus RSUs”) equivalent to $5 million in value based on the 20 day trailing average of the Company’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, closing price through August 4, 2010. Twenty-five percent of the Bonus RSUs shall vest on each of August 6, 2010, November 15, 2010, November 15, 2011 and November 15, 2012. The Bonus RSUs shall be granted
under, and in accordance with the terms of the News Corporation’s 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units. 







  
 By counter-signing
this letter agreement, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms hereof. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,

	
	 NEWS AMERICA INCORPORATED

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lawrence A. Jacobs

	Name:	 	Lawrence A. Jacobs
	Title:	 	 Senior Executive Vice President and
 General Counsel




	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ David F. DeVoe

	 David F. DeVoe
#### § 94.2 Designation of Central Authority.

The Office of Children's Issues in the Bureau of Consular Affairs is designated as the U.S. Central Authority to discharge the duties which are imposed by the Convention and the International Child Abduction Remedies Act upon such authorities.

[60 FR 25843, May 15, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,479
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,358,597
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         169,944
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           170,178
<LOANS>                                      1,091,720
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,706,388
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,006,440
<SHORT-TERM>                                   217,610
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            103,586
<LONG-TERM>                                    757,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              436
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     620,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,706,388
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,899
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               42,533
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   646
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                64,078
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,790
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,527
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,551
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,665
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,056
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,056
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.28
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,062
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    878
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                24,029
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,329
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         24,329
        

</TABLE>
### §7274. Environmental impact statements relating to defense facilities of Department of Energy

(1) The Secretary may not proceed with the preparation of an environmental impact statement relating to the construction or operation of a defense facility of the Department of Energy if the estimated cost of preparing such statement exceeds $250,000 unless—

(A) the Secretary has notified the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives of his intent to prepare such statement and a period of thirty days has expired after the date on which such notice was received by such committees; or

(B) the Secretary has received from each such committee, before the expiration of such thirty-day period, a written notice that the committee agrees with the decision of the Secretary regarding the preparation of such statement.

(2) The provisions of paragraph (1) shall not apply in the case of any environmental impact statement on which the Secretary began preparation before December 4, 1981.

(Pub. L. 97–90, title II, §212(b), Dec. 4, 1981, 95 Stat. 1171.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Energy National Security and Military Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1982, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### National Environmental Policy Act Compliance Report Requirement

Pub. L. 101–510, div. C, title XXXI, §3133, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1832, directed Secretary of Energy, not later than 30 days after the end of each quarter of fiscal years 1991 and 1992, to submit to Congress a brief report on Department of Energy's compliance with National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), which was to contain a brief description of each proposed action to be taken by the Department of Energy, the environmental impact of which was not clearly insignificant, and a description of the steps taken or proposed to be taken by the Department of Energy to assess the environmental impact of the proposed action, and if the Secretary found that the proposed action of the Department of Energy would have no significant impact, the Secretary was to include the rationale for that determination.
### §7382. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the Department of Energy has unique and extensive mathematics and science capabilities that contribute to mathematics and science education programs throughout the Nation;

(2) a need exists to increase understanding, communication, and cooperation between the Congress, the Department of Energy, other Federal agencies, and the mathematics and science education community;

(3) elementary and secondary school mathematics and science teachers can provide practical insight to the legislative and executive branches in establishing and operating education programs; and

(4) a pilot program that placed elementary and secondary school mathematics and science teachers in professional staff positions in the Senate and the House of Representatives has proven successful and demonstrated the value of expanding the program.

(Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §512, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4042.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §511, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4042, provided that: "This part [part A (§§511–518) of title V of Pub. L. 103–382, enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Act of 1994'."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VERNELL HOLLAND NICKENS, IV,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 466 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Barbara Massicotte, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem Josephine Massicotte, et al., Respondents, v. Lewis Malinowitz et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, based upon the alleged negligence of defendants, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 10, 1960, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should not have been summarily decided on motion. The mere showing of the skidding of defendants’ vehicle on a wet cobblestone pavement into plaintiffs’ parked vehicle does not establish negligence as a matter of law but presents a question of fact as to whether the defendant operator exercised reasonable care under the prevailing circumstances, which include the speed of the moving vehicle, the distance from which the parked vehicle was first noted, and the defendant’s alleged inability to stop in time to avoid an impact because of oncoming traffic (cf. *Cutler*v. *Brockington,*10 A D 2d 712, motion for leave to appeal denied 10 A D 2d 860). On the question of contributory negligence, it is for the trier of the fact to determine whether the double parking of the plaintiffs’ vehicle, in darkness, and on a traffic lane of a public highway, without rear lights, were proximate causes of the accident (cf. *Naeris*v. *New York Tel. Co.,*6 A D 2d 196; *Maloney*v. *Howard Johnson, Inc.,*5 A D 2d 1015; *Casella*v. *City of New York,*269 App. Div. 852, motion for leave to appeal denied 269 App. Div. 939). Nor should the question of credibility be determined upon a motion for summary judgment *(Di Donna*v. *Sachs,*9 A D 2d 576). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
### §4769. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, such sums as may be necessary to carry out the programs authorized by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title V, §509, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1928.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, means the provisions of subchapters I, II, III, and IV of this chapter. See section 4761 of this title.
#### Shealy *v.*The State.

April 9, 1912.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court. January 24, 1912.

*L. J. Blalock,*for plaintiff in error. *T. S. Felder, attorney-general,*and *J. B. Williams, solicitor-general,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Although evidence that, shortly after a homicide was committed, the sound of a gunshot was heard not far from the scene of the killing may have been irrelevant, in the light of the entire evidence its admission was not such prejudicial error as to require a reversal.

2. The evidence did not require a charge on the subject of voluntary manslaughter.

3. In view of the note appended by the trial judge to .the third ground of the motion for a new trial, and of the colloquy between counsel and the court, the complaint made in such ground as to the rejection of evidence was not well taken.

4. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 146.35 Mediation. ( a ) HUD shall refer to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, a mediation agency designated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, all complaints that: ( 1 ) Fall within the coverage of this part, unless the age distinction complained of is clearly with an exception; and
( 2 ) Contain all information necessary for further processing.
( b ) Both the complainant and the recipient shall participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or make an informal judgment that an agreement is not possible. There should be at least one meeting by each party with the mediator during the mediation process. However, the recipient and the complainant need not meet with the mediator at the same time.
( c ) If the complainant and the recipient reach an agreement, the mediator shall prepare a written statement of the agreement and have the complainant and recipient sign it. The mediator shall send a copy of the agreement to HUD. HUD will take no further action on the complaint unless the complainant or the recipient fails to comply with the agreement.
( d ) The mediator shall protect the confidentiality of information obtained in the course of the mediation process. No mediator shall testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course of the mediation process without the prior approval of the head of the mediation agency.
( e ) HUD shall use the mediation process for a maximum of 60 days after receiving a complaint. Mediation ends if: ( 1 ) 60 days elapse from the time HUD receives the complaint; or
( 2 ) Before the end of the 60-day period, an agreement is reached; or
( 3 ) Before the end of the 60-day period, the mediator determines that an agreement cannot be reached.
This 60-day period may be extended by the mediator, with the concurrence of HUD, for not more than an additional 30 days if the mediator determines that it is likely that an agreement will be reached during such extended period.
#### Louis Latinette, appellee, v. Southern Railway Company, appellant.

Action on the case for recovery for crops destroyed by water escaping from break in a sewer. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. William F. Borders, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Kramer, Kramer & Campbell and R. Emmett Costello, for appellant. G. C. Borders and Owen Dillon, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         287,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  464,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    108,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,291,700
<PP&E>                                       1,229,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                 371,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,702,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,855,429
<BONDS>                                         61,945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,489
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,702,673
<SALES>                                      4,078,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,078,434
<CGS>                                        2,558,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,103,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (577,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (577,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (577,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Child DevelopmentChild HealthChildhood NeedsChildrenDevelopmental StagesEmotional DevelopmentFamily School RelationshipMental HealthMental Health ProgramsPreschool EducationPsychological NeedsResource MaterialsStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### In the Matter of the Board of Education of the Deer Park Union Free School District, Appellant, v Ewald B. Nyquist, as Commis*1020sioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered November 23, 1976 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to permanently stay the Commissioner of Education from determining an appeal before him pursuant to section 310 of the Education Law. Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Cobb at Special Term. Kane, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.