alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4370d. Percentage of Federal funding for organizations owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall, on and after October 6, 1992, to the fullest extent possible, ensure that at least 8 per centum of Federal funding for prime and subcontracts awarded in support of authorized programs, including grants, loans, and contracts for wastewater treatment and leaking underground storage tanks grants, be made available to business concerns or other organizations owned or controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals (within the meaning of section 637(a)(5) and (6) of title 15), including historically black colleges and universities. For purposes of this section, economically and socially disadvantaged individuals shall be deemed to include women.

(Pub. L. 102–389, title III, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1602.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0363
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lawrence W. Heavlin, Appellant.

Appeal from judgments of the County Court of Chemung County, rendered April 9, 1976, convicting defendant on his pleas of guilty of the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree and burglary in the third degree. The propriety of defendant’s conviction for possessing stolen property is not challenged on this appeal and, insofar as the sentence therefor is concerned, we find no abuse of discretion committed by the trial court in imposing a term consistent with the plea negotiations and which defendant understood he would receive. As to the separate burglary conviction, we agree with the trial court’s determination that the search warrant was issued on sufficient probable cause and that the confession given by defendant following its execution was not obtained by any promise creating a substantial risk that he might falsely incriminate himself. The concurrent sentence for this conviction was likewise in accordance with the plea negotiations and we perceive no reason to disturb it. Judgments affirmed. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Mahoney and Main, JJ., concur.
§ 1000.204 How does an Indian tribe designate itself as recipient of the grant? ( a ) By resolution of the Indian tribe; or
( b ) When such authority has been delegated by an Indian tribe's governing body to a tribal committee(s), by resolution or other written form used by such committee(s) to memorialize the decisions of that body, if applicable.
§ 1000.54 What procedures apply to complaints arising out of any of the methods of providing for Indian preference? The following procedures are applicable to complaints arising out of any of the methods of providing for Indian preference contained in this part, including alternate methods. Tribal policies that meet or exceed the requirements of this section shall apply. ( a ) Each complaint shall be in writing, signed, and filed with the recipient.
( b ) A complaint must be filed with the recipient no later than 20 calendar days from the date of the action (or omission) upon which the complaint is based.
( c ) Upon receipt of a complaint, the recipient shall promptly stamp the date and time of receipt upon the complaint, and immediately acknowledge its receipt.
( d ) Within 20 calendar days of receipt of a complaint, the recipient shall either meet, or communicate by mail or telephone, with the complainant in an effort to resolve the matter. The recipient shall make a determination on a complaint and notify the complainant, in writing, within 30 calendar days of the submittal of the complaint to the recipient. The decision of the recipient shall constitute final administrative action on the complaint.
#### In the Matter of Diane Mazarakis, Respondent, v Louis Mazarakis, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 455]

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated March 24, 2006, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination in an order dated February 7, 2006, sustaining the mother’s objection to that portion of an order of the same court (Fields-Ferraro, S.M.), dated December 14, 2005, which, inter alia, dismissed her petition seeking contribution from the father for the daughter’s college expenses.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order dated March 24, 2006, was *759superseded by an order of disposition, dated September 8, 2006, and entered upon consent of the parties, from which no appeal lies *(see Matter of Khan v Dolly,*302 AD2d 596 [2003]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2814

To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 

reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the 

treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005

Mr. MCNULTY (for himself, Mr. HERGER, Mrs. MCCARTHY, and Mr. DAVIS

of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 

Ways and Means, Government Reform, Armed Services, Veterans’ Affairs, and Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for 

the payment or reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the treatment of sexual 

or erectile dysfunction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR DRUGS PRESCRIBED 

4 TO SEX OFFENDERS FOR THE TREATMENT OF 

5 SEXUAL OR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION. 

6 (a) RESTRICTION.—
2

•HR 2814 IH 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

2 provision of law, no Federal funds may be expended 

3 for the payment or reimbursement, including pay4 ment or reimbursement under the programs de5 scribed in paragraph (2), of a drug that is pre6 scribed to an individual described in paragraph (3) 

7 for the treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction. 

8 (2) PROGRAMS DESCRIBED.—The programs de9 scribed in this paragraph are the medicaid program, 

10 the medicare program, the Federal employees health 

11 benefits program, the Defense Health Program, the 

12 program of medical care furnished by the Secretary 

13 of Veterans Affairs, health related programs admin14 istered by the Indian Health Service, health related 

15 programs funded under the Public Health Service 

16 Act, and any other Federal health program. 

17 (3) INDIVIDUAL DESCRIBED.—An individual de18 scribed in this paragraph is an individual who has 

19 a conviction for sexual abuse, sexual assault, or any 

20 other sexual offense. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply to 

22 drugs dispensed on or after the date of enactment of this 

23 Act.

Æ
§ 201.14 Payments on the loan. The note normally shall provide for equal installment payments due weekly, biweekly, semi-monthly or monthly. The note may provide for either or both of the first and final payments to vary in amount but not to exceed 11 ⁄ 2 times the regular installment. Where the borrower has an irregular flow of income, the note may be payable at quarterly or semi-annual intervals corresponding with the borrower's flow of income. The first scheduled payment after the borrower's initial payment shall be due no later than two months from the date of the loan. Multiple payment schedules may not be used in connection with any loan.
Case 3:09-cr-00523-WHA Document 130 Filed 07/12/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:09-cr-00523-WHA Document 130 Filed 07/12/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:09-cr-00523-WHA Document 130 Filed 07/12/10 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.73 Property development. ( a ) The property shall be suitable and principally designed for the intended use, as provided by the applicable section of the Act under which the mortgage is insured, and have long-term marketability. Design, construction, substantial rehabilitation and repairs shall be in accordance with standards established by the Commissioner.
( b ) A project may include such commercial and community facilities as the Commissioner deems acceptable.
( c ) The improvements shall constitute a single project. Not less than five rental dwelling units or personal care units, 20 medical care beds, or 50 manufactured home pads, shall be on one site, except that such limitations do not apply to group practice facilities.
#### § 1.3 Application of part 1.

This part 1 applies to any program or activity for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under a law administered by the Department. It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended to any such program or activity on or after January 3, 1965. This part 1 does not apply to: (a) Any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contracts, (b) money paid, property transferred, or other assistance extended to any such program or activity before January 3, 1965, (c) any assistance to any person who is the ultimate beneficiary under any such program or activity, or (d) any employment practice, under any such program or activity, of any employer, employment agency, or labor organization, except to the extent described in § 1.4(c).

[38 FR 17949, July 5, 1973, as amended at 83 FR 26360, June 7, 2018]
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T NI COLAE E NA CHE, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70988 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 006- 703 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . N i c ol a e E na c he , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of R om ani a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s ( “ IJ ”) depo rt at i on order. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of ac ont i nua nc e , and 

# FI LED JU L 12 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70988 2 d e n o v o c la im s o f

du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s in im m ig r a tio n p r o c e e d in g s . Sa n do v a lL un a v. Mukasey , 526 F . 3d 1243, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2008) ( pe rc ur i a m ) . W e de nythe p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he I Jdi d notabus e hi s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng ac ont i nua nc e be c aus e E na c he d idn o t d e m o n s tr a te g o o dc au s e . See 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 29 ( an I Jm aygr antam ot i on f orc ont i nuanc e f

orgood c aus e s how n) . I tf ol l ow s tha tE na c he c annote s t abl i s h the I Jv io la te dh is du e p r o c e s s r ig h ts . Se e La ta v . I NS , 20 4 F . 3d 12 41 , 12 46 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( re qu i ri ng error f or a due process vi ol at i on ). T he B IA corr ec t l y det erm i ned thatE nache fa i l ed t o d em on strat e pre j ud i ce , s o h is c la im o f

in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l f

a ils . See R oj as-G arci a v. A s h c r o ft , 33 9 F . 3d 81 4, 82 6 (9th C i r. 20 03 ) ( t o p re vai l on an i neff ec t i ve as si st ance o f c o u n s e l c la im , ap e titio n e rm u s t d e m o n s tr a te p r e ju d ic e ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Christ W. Dahnke, appellant, v. Berthold and Helena John, appellees.

Gen. No. 27,634.

Suit for balance due on contract for building concrete tanks for fuel oil. Set-off claiming damages resulting from alleged defects in said tanks. Judgment for defendants. See John v. Dahnke, *supra,*this volume. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Greenway, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 9, 1923.

Rehearing denied June 5, 1923.

Goldzier, Rodgers & Froehlich, for appellant. William Reeda and Oke L. Pearson, for appellees; Amos W. Marston, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2494 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2494

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Chloroacetic acid, ethyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

  Mr. Hayes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Chloroacetic acid, ethyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHLOROACETIC ACID, ETHYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Chloroacetic acid,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         ethyl ester (CAS                                                   31/2008
                         No. 105-39-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2915.40.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.405 Notice to public.

Participants in insurance programs under the National Housing Act shall be informed, as early as possible upon indicating their interest in any such program, of the established policy of nondiscrimination in employment in construction, repair or rehabilitation work financed with assistance under the Act.
### §5615. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5615 was editorially reclassified as section 11115 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §4153. Standards for design, construction, and alteration of buildings; Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall prescribe standards for the design, construction, and alteration of buildings which are residential structures subject to this chapter to insure whenever possible that physically handicapped persons will have ready access to, and use of, such buildings.

(Pub. L. 90–480, §3, Aug. 12, 1968, 82 Stat. 719; Pub. L. 94–541, title II, §201(3), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2507; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–541 substituted "shall prescribe" and "to insure whenever possible" for "is authorized to prescribe such" and "as may be necessary to insure", respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
**EXHIBIT
      99.7**











**VERMILION
      ENERGY TRUST**


**CERTIFICATE
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





Pursuant
      to Section
      906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
      United States Code





In
      connection with
      the annual report of Vermilion Energy Trust (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for
      the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lorenzo Donadeo, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1. the
      Report fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Dated
      at Calgary,
      Alberta, Canada this 20 th day of March 2007.








*(“Lorenzo
              Donadeo”)*****LORENZO DONADEO, CHIEF
              EXECUTIVE
              OFFICER













**VERMILION
        ENERGY TRUST**
 **CERTIFICATE
        OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 
 Pursuant
        to Section
        906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 Subsections
        (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
        United States Code
 
 In
        connection with
        the annual report of Vermilion Energy Trust (the “Corporation”) on Form 40-F for
        the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis Hicks, Chief
        Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. the
        Report fully
        complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. the
        information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 
 Dated
        at
        Calgary, Alberta, Canada this 20 th day of March 2007.
  *(“Curtis
                  W. Hicks”)*****CURTIS
                    W.
                    HICKS, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kam Seto: Continue Sentencing 1

MARK ROSENBUSH

Attorney at Law (CSB 72436)

214 Duboce Avenue

San Francisco, California 94103

Tel: (415) 861-3555

Fax: (415) 255-8631

Attorney for Defendant

KAM SETO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

 v.

KAM SETO et al,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-09-0824-MMC

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING OF

KAM SETO TO SEPTEMBER 8, 2010

The parties submit the instant Stipulation and Order seeking to continue the sentencing of

defendant Kam Seto from August 25, 2010 to September 8, 2010.

The parties agree that a continuance is necessary for completion of the pre-sentence

report, and adequate preparation of defense counsel in this complex multi-defendant matter. 

Because of pressing concerns on other pending matters, the need for additional time to prepare

for the sentencing hearing in this case, and immediate family medical matters of serious concern,

counsel for defendant Seto cannot be prepared to proceed with the sentencing in this case on

August 25, 2010.

The parties have consulted with the probation officer, who has confirmed that he is

available for the requested September 8, 2010 sentencing hearing, and that he will have the presentence report completed in time for sentencing to proceed on that date. The Court Clerk also

Case 3:09-cr-00824-MMC Document 71 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

confirms that the Court’s calendar is compatible with continuance of this hearing to the requested

date. Co-defendant Zhijian Wu is already set for sentencing on that same day.

Accordingly, good cause appearing therefore, and the parties having stipulated thereto,

the sentencing hearing for defendant Kam Seto, currently scheduled for August 25, 2010, shall be

rescheduled and held on September 8, 2010 at 2:30 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 29, 2010 __/s/ Mark Rosenbush___

MARK ROSENBUSH

Attorney for Defendant KAM SETO

Dated: July 29, 2010 __/s/ Kyle Waldinger____

KYLE WALDINGER

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _________________ _______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

July 30, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-00824-MMC Document 71 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 2
exv10w8






Exhibit 10.8




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



On September 29, 2010, upon recommendation of its Compensation Committee, the Board approved
the following Director Compensation measures effective October 31, 2010:





	1.	 	Base Cash Compensation






	 	•	 	Each non-employee director will receive Base Cash Compensation of $70,000 annually
beginning October 31, 2010. Payments will be made quarterly in arrears.
	 
	 	•	 	Each non-employee director shall have a one time election to convert all or any portion
of the Base Cash Compensation for the next 3 years into an option vesting over 3 years (the
“Option in Lieu of Cash”). Total Base Cash Compensation per non-employee director for the
next 3 years (the first year being the 8 month period Oct 31, 2010 through June 30, 2011)
is equal to approximately $186,667.






	2.	 	 Additional Cash Compensation






	 	•	 	Each non-employee director will also receive the following annual Additional Cash
Compensation based upon his or her service on committees of the Board:





	 	 	 

	Chair (annual Additional Committee Cash Compensation)
	-Audit

-Compensation

-Nominating/Governance

	 	$24,000

$16,000

$10,000
	 
	 	 
	Member (annual Additional Committee Cash Compensation)
	-Audit

-Compensation

-Nominating/Governance

	 	$12,000

$8,000

$5,000







	 	•	 	Additional Cash Compensation cannot be converted into an option since committee
memberships and chairmanship can change year to year. Payments will be paid quarterly in
arrears.






	3.	 	Equity Award






	 	•	 	In addition to any Option in Lieu of Cash, each director will receive an option vesting
over 3 years (the “3 Year Equity Award”) calculated to be worth $150,000 per year for three
years ($100,000 for Year One (8 months), $150,000 for Year Two, and $150,000 for Year
Three), equal to a total option award equivalent to $400,000.
	 
	 	•	 	The number of options subject to each Option in Lieu of Cash, as well as each 3 Year
Equity Award, will be calculated based on a Black-Scholes model.
#### § 1103.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1103.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.