alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with § 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on November 10, 2004.[1] 

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with increasing the federal funds rate to an average of around 2 percent.

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, December 17, 2004.

Vincent R. Reinhart,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on November 10, 2004, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.  The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 04-28214 Field 12-23-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### § 241.9 No acceleration of Eligible Notes.

Eligible Notes shall not be subject to acceleration, in whole or in part, by USAID, the Noteholder or any other party. USAID shall not have the right to pay any amounts in respect of the Eligible Notes other than in accordance with the original payment terms of such Eligible Notes.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

    v.

APPROXIMATELY $57,378 IN UNITEDSTATES CURRENCY,

Defendant___________________________________

KAP SUK SIMS,Claimant

                                                                      /

No. C-08-5023 MMC

ORDER LIFTING STAY OFPROCEEDINGS; SETTING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE           

By order filed February 24, 2009, the above-titled action was stayed in light of then-

ongoing proceedings in United States v. Sims, No. CR 8-0443.  Because judgment in such

criminal case was entered October 8, 2009, the Court finds it appropriate to lift the stay and

to set a case management conference.

Accordingly, the stay of proceedings is hereby LIFTED, and the parties shall appear

for a Case Management Conference to be conducted March 19, 2010, at 10:30 a.m.  A

Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than March 12, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  January 12, 2010                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05023-MMC   Document 20   Filed 01/12/10   Page 1 of 1
#### Thomas F. Meade, appellee, v. Joseph P. Geary et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 28,232.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, following McCarthy v. Geary, 229 Ill. App. 414. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, for appellants; Gilbert G. Ogden, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel. A. D. Gash, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OBELIA D. VILLAFLOR, et al.,

Plaintiffs,    v.

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, 

Defendant.                                                                      /

No. C 09-329 MMC (EDL)

ORDER DENYING EQUIFAX’S MOTIONFOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVEPRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATEJUDGE

Before the Court is defendant Equifax Information Services LLC’s (“Equifax”) Motion

for Relief, filed August 9, 2010, by which Equifax objects to certain portions of Magistrate

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order, issued

July 22, 2010.

Having fully considered the matter, the Court hereby DENIES the motion, for the

reason Equifax has failed to show the subject order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (providing district court may reconsider magistrate judge’s

order where it has been shown to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to law”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 12, 2010                                                            MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00329-MMC   Document 117   Filed 08/12/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-12T09:37:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
          TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 21, 2007

                                                         /s/ R. Greg Smith
                                                         -----------------
                                                         R. Greg Smith
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### In re DAVENPORT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 16, 1903.)

In the matter of the settlement of the account of William B. Davenport, as administrator of the goods, chattels, and credits which were of Eliza T. White, deceased.

PER CURIAM.

We have heretofore considered all questions presented upon this motion in a previous decision herein. As already pointed out, the denial of this motion does not preclude appellant from raising the questions upon appeal from the final order, if that order be adverse to him. Were this not so, we would now be inclined to afford him an opportunity by granting this motion. Motion denied, without costs.
#### § 72.4 Notifications of death.

The consular officer should make best efforts to notify the next of kin (or legal guardian), if any, and the legal representative (if any, and if different from the next of kin), of the death of a United States citizen or non-citizen national by telephone as soon as possible, and then should follow up with a written notification of death.
#### In the Matter of Dow Chemical Company, Appellant. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding for the production of transcripts of testimony before a certain Grand Jury and for the production of exhibits submitted to that Grand Jury, for use in a private, civil action, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered March 18, 1977, which denied the application. Order affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly to respondents (see *People v Di Napoli,*27 NY2d 229; *Albert v Zahner’s Sales Co.,*51 AD2d 541). We understand that the District Attorney has agreed to return the exhibits to their owners. Hopkins, J. P., Margett, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.
#### Nathan Bregstone v. Barnet Greenberg and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present —■ Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, January 18, 2005, from 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7977. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, January 18, 2005 from 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues. 

Dated: December 17, 2004.

Bernard Coston, 

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 04-28014 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[I.D. 122004B]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Processed Products Family of Forms.
    Form Number(s): NOAA Forms 88-13, 88-13c.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0018.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 680.
    Number of Respondents: 1,320.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes for Form 88-13; 15 minutes 
for Form 88-13c.
    Needs and Uses: This is a survey of seafood and industrial fish 
processing firms. The firms processing fish from certain fisheries must 
report on their annual volume, the wholesale value of products, and 
monthly employment figures. Data are used in economic analyses to 
estimate the capacity and extent to which processors utilize domestic 
harvest. These analyses are necessary to carry out the provision of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Monthly, annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35517d4c5b505e75515a561b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="117559687f747a51757e723f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c280d1a0508333e031f1807091e2c03010e4209031c420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="571336213e3308053824233c322517383a357932382779303821">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 17, 2004.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-28133 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2539 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2539

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain cathode-ray 
                                 tubes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

 Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain cathode-ray 
                                 tubes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CATHODE-RAY TUBES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.85.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain cathode-ray tubes) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, ME; Acadia National Park 
Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 
10), that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a 
meeting on Monday, February 7, 2005.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Public Law 99-420, Sec. 
103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of 
the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management 
and development of the park, including but not limited to the 
acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation 
easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy.
    The meeting will convene at park Headquarters, McFarland Hill, Bar 
Harbor, Maine, at 1 p.m. to consider the following agenda:
    1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held September 
13, 2004.
    2. Committee reports:

--Land Conservation.
--Park Use.
--Science.
--Historic.

    3. Old business.
    4. Superintendent's report.
    5. Public comments.
    6. Proposed agenda for next Commission meeting, June 6, 2005.
    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make 
oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written 
statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least 
seven days prior to the meeting.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, 
Maine 04609, tel: (207) 288-3338.

    Dated: December 1, 2004.
Sheridan Steele,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 04-28290 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
MANUEL R. RAMIREZ

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4472

______ _______________________/

Opinion filed November 4, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark, Jr. , Judge

.

Manuel R. Ramirez, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SWANSON, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Advisory Commission

# AGENCY:

National Park Service.

# ACTION:

 Notice of January 15, 2005, meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the date of the January 15, 2005, meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

# DATES:

The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on Saturday, January 15, 2005, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Additionally, the Commission will attend the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force meeting the same day from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m., which is also open to the public.

*Location:*                         The Commission meeting will be held at the Somerset County Courthouse, Courtroom #1; 2nd floor; 111 East Union Street, Somerset, Pennsylvania, 15501. The Flight 93 Memorial Task Force meeting will be held in the same location.                    

### Agenda

The January 15, 2005 Commission meeting will consist of:

(1) Opening of meeting and pledge of allegiance.

(2) Review and approval of minutes from May 14, 2004.

(3) Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force and the National Park Service. Comments from the public will be received after each report.

(4) Old business.

(5) New business.

(6) Closing remarks.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501, 814.443.4557.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda items. The statement should be addressed to the Flight 93                           ( print page 77776)                        Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501.                

Dated: November 30, 2004.

Joanne M. Hanley,

Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.

[FR Doc. 04-28289  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-WH-M
#### Seymour Kemach et al., Plaintiffs, and Teresa R. Manicone, as Administratrix of the Estate of Carmine R. Manicone, Deceased, Respondent, v. American Airlines, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In a negligence action by two plaintiffs (Kemach and Gottlieb) to recover damages for personal injuries, and by a third plaintiff, Teresa R. Manicone, as administratrix to recover damages for the wrongful death of her husband, Carmine R. Manicone, arising out of an airplane crash, the defendant American Airlines, Inc., the owner and operator of the airplane, appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 8, 1962 after a jury trial, as is in favor of the administratrix and against it for $300,000, plus interest and costs. The jury has rendered a verdict of $420,000 in favor of said administratrix against said defendant, but the trial court set aside such verdict and ordered a new trial unless the administratrix stipulated to reduce such verdict to $300,000. She so stipulated and judgment was entered accordingly. On this appeal the said defendant contends that, despite the reduction, the verdict is excessive. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts, and, as to said administratrix, the action is severed and a new trial granted as between her and defendant American, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 20 days after entry of the order hereon, said administratrix shall stipulate to further reduce to $220,000 the amount of the verdict in her favor, in which event the judgment as to her, as thus further reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the verdict, although reduced to $300,000, was still excessive; it should be further reduced to $220,000. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.