alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LeachXS LiteTM is a data management and visual ization tool that is an essential part of the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framew ork (LEAF). The tool allows the user to evaluate leaching data and characterize the release of constituents in materials under various conditions based on comparisons derived from leaching test results. LeachXS Lite is a simplified version of full software package LeachXSTM which facilitates data comparison with field results over a range of scenarios based using either empirical relationships or mass transfer and geochemi cal speciation models to provide a source term for constituent leaching. LeachXS Lite is freely available at
www.vanderbilt.edu/leachinddownloads with user registration required to obtain a free-of -charge license key.

LeachXS and LeachXS Lite have been devel oped jointly by The Energy Research Centre of The Netherlands (Petten, The Netherlands ), Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN, USA) and DHI (Horsholm, Denmark). Ongoi ng development of LeachXS Lite is ongoing and will add expanded functionality and leaching test data to subsequent versions over the next several months. Updated versions wi ll also be available for free download from
the above web address. The current version avai lable is considered a pre-beta version that will be undergoing reviews by stakeholders, peer, QA, and administrative reviews.

LeachXS Lite is supplied currently w ith a database of results from the CCR characterization conducted to date. Leaching test results included in the published reports
for more than 70 CCRs was limited to 13 c onstituents; however, the supplied LeachXS Lite database provides data for an additi on 40 constituents in most cases. All data
contained in the LeachXS Lite database has be en subject to quality assurance, peer, and administrative reviews as part of EPA ORD's requirements.

LeachXS Lite can be used for data manageme nt and analysis for results from leaching tests carried out on a wide range of materials and waste types (e-g., secondary or recycled materials, stabilized waste and construction materials). The program provides facilitated data management and leaching data comparison including:

 Direct import of leaching data from Excel data templates,

 Comparison of leaching from different ma terials or leaching tests, allowing inferences about leaching mechanisms a nd material characteris tics and behavior under different conditions,

 Comparison of leaching to reference values (e.g., method detection limits, applicable pH domain, water quality indicato rs; either preloaded or user defined) for individual constituents,

 Comparison of leaching from a specific materi al to statistical representation of a class or sub-class of materials, and

 Uniform data presentation and graphic out put to Microsoft Excel® spreadsheets.
LeachXS Lite installation includes th e Excel data input templates for the preliminary versions of EPA Methods 1313 through 1316. These leaching test methods are cwently undergoing inter-lab oratory precision and reproducibility test for planned inclusion in EPA SW -846 "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, PhysicaVChemical Methods".
### §3056m. Report on service to minority individuals

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall annually prepare a report on the levels of participation and performance outcomes of minority individuals served by the program carried out under this subchapter.

#### (b) Contents

#### (1) Organization and data

Such report shall present information on the levels of participation and the outcomes achieved by such minority individuals with respect to each grantee under this subchapter, by service area, and in the aggregate, beginning with data that applies to program year 2005.

#### (2) Efforts

The report shall also include a description of each grantee's efforts to serve minority individuals, based on information submitted to the Secretary by each grantee at such time and in such manner as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

#### (3) Related matters

The report shall also include—

(A) an assessment of individual grantees based on the criteria established under subsection (c);

(B) an analysis of whether any changes in grantees have affected participation rates of such minority individuals;

(C) information on factors affecting participation rates among such minority individuals; and

(D) recommendations for increasing participation of minority individuals in the program.

#### (c) Criteria

The Secretary shall establish criteria for determining the effectiveness of grantees in serving minority individuals in accordance with the goals set forth in section 3056(a)(1) of title.

#### (d) Submission

The Secretary shall annually submit such a report to the appropriate committees of Congress.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §515, as added Pub. L. 109–365, title V, §501, Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2587.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3056m, Pub. L. 89–73, title V, §515, as added Pub. L. 106–501, title V, §501, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2286, related to authorization of appropriations, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 109–365. See section 3056o of this title.
ex10_4.htm











Exhibit 10.4


 


AMENDMENT #1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT









ePlus inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and Mark P. Marron (the “Executive”) (collectively, “the Parties”) have previously entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective April 22, 2010.  The Parties hereby agree to this Amendment #1 (“Amendment #1”)


 


1.           The last sentence of Section 5(b) shall be replaced with the following:


 


In no event will any bonus earned under this Section 5(b) be paid later than the next December 31st following the fiscal year in which the bonus was earned, unless calculation of the bonus is not administratively practicable by that date, and further delay would not violate Code Section 409A.


 


2.           Subsection 7(c)(5) shall be replaced with the following:


 


              (5)           Any release and certification required from the Executive under the first paragraph of this Section 7(c) shall be on the form attached as Exhibit 1 unless the Company has provided Executive a different form on or before his termination of employment.  The applicable release and certification must be signed and returned by Executive to the Company within twenty one (21) days of the date of termination of employment and not revoked in order for Executive to be entitled to payments under Section 7(c).  Except as provided by subsection 7(c)(4), provided the requirements of this subsection are met, any lump sum payment due Executive under subsection 7(c)(1), (2),  or (3) shall be paid on the last day of the thirty (30) day, sixty (60) day or other applicable period in which the Company may make such payment in compliance with the applicable provision.


 


 



	
/s/ Phillip G. Norton 

	 	
/s/ Mark P. Marron 

	  
	
Phillip G. Norton

	 	
Mark P. Marron 

	  
	
Chief Executive Officer

	 	
Chief Operating Officer

	  
	
Date: September 16, 2010

	 	
Date: September 16, 2010
#### § 92.62 Captioning and certifying depositions.

The notarizing officer should prepare a caption for every deposition; should certify on the deposition that the witness was duly sworn by him and that the deposition is a true record of the testimony given by the witness; and should sign and seal the certification in the manner prescribed in §§ 92.15 and 92.16. (Rules 30 (f) (1) and 31 (b), Rules of Civil Procedures for the District Courts of the United States.)

[22 FR 10858, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 60 FR 51723, Oct. 3, 1995]
#### Jacob Friedman, Respondent, v. Eastwood Stock Farms, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants to extend time to perfect appeal, granted. Appellants’ time is extended to the March Term, commencing February 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### BRATT, Respondent, v. GIBBS et al., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 29, 1905.)

Action by Fred A. Bratt against Alfred C. Gibbs, Earl Kinney, and James McClarty. No opinion. Judgment and orders unanimously affirmed, with costs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD CARDONA,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-5429 CRB (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues

relating to federal review of parole decisions in California. See Hayward v. Marshall,

No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). The court

requests that the parties submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 12 pages in length)

explaining their views on how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole

denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule:

1. Within 10 days of this order, respondent shall send to petitioner a copy

of the Hayward decision. 

2. Within 30 days of this order, respondent shall file with the court and

serve on petitioner a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

3. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file with the court and serve on

respondent a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 30, 2010 CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.08\Cardona, R1.or1.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-05429-CRB Document 12 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 231.03 The Guarantee.

Subject to the terms and conditions set out in this part, the United States of America, acting through USAID, guarantees to Noteholders the Borrower's repayment of 100 percent of principal and interest due on Eligible Notes. Under this Guarantee, USAID agrees to pay to any Noteholder compensation in Dollars equal to such Noteholder's Loss of Investment under its Eligible Note; provided, however, that no such payment shall be made to any Noteholder for any such loss arising out of fraud or misrepresentation for which such Noteholder is responsible or of which it had knowledge at the time it became such Noteholder. This Guarantee shall apply to each Eligible Note registered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent.
### §4031. Treatment of certain payments

Assistance provided under a program under this chapter for flood mitigation activities (including any assistance provided under the mitigation pilot program under section 4102a 1 of this title, any assistance provided under the mitigation assistance program under section 4104c of this title, and any funding provided under section 4030 1 of this title) with respect to a property shall not be considered income or a resource of the owner of the property when determining eligibility for or benefit levels under any income assistance or resource-tested program that is funded in whole or in part by an agency of the United States or by appropriated funds of the United States.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XIII, §1324, as added Pub. L. 109–64, §1, Sept. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 1997.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to "this title" meaning title XIII of Pub. L. 90–448, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 572, known as the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4001 of this title and Tables.

Section 4102a of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, §100225(c), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 941.

Section 4030 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 112–141, div. F, title II, §100225(b), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 941.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### In the Matter of James C. Baldwin, Respondent, v. Ernest Halpern, Appellant, and Scarsdale Gardens, Inc., Judgment-Debtor.

In a proceeding supplementary to judgment, Ernest Halpem, one of the judgment debtors, appeals from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated October 25, 1961, made pursuant to section 793 of the Civil Practice Act, directing him to make installment payments of $50 a week on account of the judgment. Order *675affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 100.80 Discriminatory representations on the availability of dwellings. ( a ) It shall be unlawful, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, to provide inaccurate or untrue information about the availability of dwellings for sale or rental.
( b ) Prohibited actions under this section include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Indicating through words or conduct that a dwelling which is available for inspection, sale, or rental has been sold or rented, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 2 ) Representing that covenants or other deed, trust or lease provisions which purport to restrict the sale or rental of dwellings because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin preclude the sale of rental of a dwelling to a person.
( 3 ) Enforcing covenants or other deed, trust, or lease provisions which preclude the sale or rental of a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 4 ) Limiting information, by word or conduct, regarding suitably priced dwellings available for inspection, sale or rental, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 5 ) Providing false or inaccurate information regarding the availability of a dwelling for sale or rental to any person, including testers, regardless of whether such person is actually seeking housing, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 6 ) Representing to an applicant that a unit is unavailable because of the applicant's response to a request for a sexual favor or other harassment because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
[54 FR 3283, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 81 FR 63074, Sept. 14, 2016]
#  Provision of Aviation Insurance Coverage for Commercial Air Carrier Service in Domestic and International Operations

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Transportation

                    By the authority vested in me by 49 U.S.C. 44302,                     *et seq*., I hereby:                 

1. determine that continuation of U.S.-flag commercial air service is necessary in the interest of air commerce, national security, and the foreign policy of the United States. 

2. approve provision by the Secretary of Transportation of insurance or reinsurance to U.S.-flag air carriers against loss or damage arising out of any risk from the operation of an aircraft in the manner and to the extent provided in Chapter 443 of 49 U.S.C.: 

3. delegate to the Secretary of Transportation the authority, vested in me by 49 U.S.C. 44306(c), to extend this determination for additional periods beyond August 31, 2005, but no later than December 31, 2005, when he finds that the continued operation of aircraft to be insured or reinsured is necessary in the interest of air commerce or the national security, or to carry out the foreign policy of the United States Government. 

                    You are directed to bring this determination immediately to the attention of all air carriers within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. 40102(2), and to arrange for its publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 04-28405

Billing code 4910-62-P
§ 1000.30 What prohibitions regarding conflict of interest are applicable? ( a ) *Applicability.* In the procurement of supplies, equipment, other property, construction and services by recipients and subrecipients, the conflict of interest provisions of 2 CFR 200.318 shall apply. In all cases not governed by 2 CFR 200.318, the following provisions of this section shall apply.
( b ) *Conflicts prohibited.* No person who participates in the decision-making process or who gains inside information with regard to NAHASDA assisted activities may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from such activities, except for the use of NAHASDA funds to pay salaries or other related administrative costs. Such persons include anyone with an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement or proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or others with whom they have business or immediate family ties. Immediate family ties are determined by the Indian tribe or TDHE in its operating policies.
( c ) The conflict of interest provision does not apply in instances where a person who might otherwise be included under the conflict provision is low-income and is selected for assistance in accordance with the recipient's written policies for eligibility, admission and occupancy of families for housing assistance with IHBG funds, provided that there is no conflict of interest under applicable tribal or state law. The recipient must make a public disclosure of the nature of assistance to be provided and the specific basis for the selection of the person. The recipient shall provide the appropriate Area ONAP with a copy of the disclosure before the assistance is provided to the person.
[63 FR 12349, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 75944, Dec. 7, 2015]
#### MUELLER BROS. ART *&*MFG. CO., Appellant, v. McDOWELL, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 14, 1903.)

Action by the Mueller Bros. Art & Manufacturing Company against Russell J. McDowell.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

KELLOGG, J., not voting.
§ 3.10 Enforcement. ( a ) Each employing agency is responsible under the Act for reporting to the Attorney General cases in which there is reason to believe that one of its employees has violated the Act. The Attorney General in turn may file a civil action in any United States District Court against any Federal employee who has knowingly solicited or accepted a gift from a foreign government in violation of the Act, or who has failed to deposit or report such gift, as an Act required by the Act. In such case, the court may assess a maximum penality of the retail value of a gift improperly solicited or received, plus $5,000.
( b ) Supervisory officials at all levels within employing agencies shall be responsible for providing periodic reorientation of all employees under their supervision on the basic features of the Act and these regulations, and for ensuring that those employees observe the requirements for timely reporting and deposit of any gifts of more than minimal value they may have accepted.
( c ) Employees are advised of the following actions which may result from failure to comply with the requirements of the Act and these regulations: ( 1 ) Any supervisor who has substantial reason to believe that an employee under his or her supervision has violated the reporting or other compliance provisions of the Act shall report the facts and circumstances in writing to the senior official in charge of administration within the cognizant bureau or office or at the post abroad. If that official upon investigation decides that an employee who is the donee of a gift or is the recipient of travel or travel expenses has, through actions within the employee's control, failed to comply with the procedures established by the Act and these regulations, the case shall be referred to the Attorney General for appropriate action.
( 2 ) In cases of confirmed evidence of a violation, whether or not such violation results in the taking of action by the Attorney General, the senior administrative official referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section as responsible for forwarding a violation report to the Attorney General shall institute appropriate disciplinary action against an employee who has failed to ( i ) Deposit tangible gifts within 60 days after acceptance,
( ii ) account properly for the acceptance of travel expenses or
( iii ) comply with the Act's requirements respecting disposal of gifts and decorations retained for official use.
( 3 ) In cases where there is confirmed evidence of a violation, but no evidence that the violation was willful on the part of the employee, the senior administrative official referred to in paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall institute appropriate disciplinary action of a lesser degree than that called for in paragraph (c)(2) of this section in order to deter future violations by the same or another employee.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 276]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ276.106]

Public Law 106-276
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 extend the retroactive eligibility dates for financial assistance for 
 higher education for spouses and dependent children of Federal, State, 
    and local law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of 
               duty. <<NOTE: Oct. 2, 2000 -  [S. 1638]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RETROACTIVE ELIGIBILITY DATES FOR 
                            FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER 
                            EDUCATION FOR SPOUSES AND CHILDREN OF 
                            LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS KILLED IN THE 
                            LINE OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1216(a) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796d-5(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``May 1, 1992'', and inserting ``January 1, 
        1978,'' ; and
            (2) by striking ``October 1, 1997,'' and inserting ``January 
        1, 1978,''.

    (b) Effective <<NOTE: 42 USC 3796d-5 note.>> Date.--The amendments 
made by subsection (a) shall take effect October 1, 1999.

    Approved October 2, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1638 (H.R. 2059):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-800 accompanying H.R. 2059 (Comm. on the 
Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            May 15, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 19, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```