alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# ACTION:

Notice of Members of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Performance Review Board (PRB). 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the appointment of members of the PRB for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The Board reviews the performance appraisals of career and non-career senior executives. The Board makes recommendations regarding proposed performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses and other appropriate personnel actions.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Angelica E. Ibarguen, Chief Human Capital Officer, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.

*Composition of PRB:*                         The Board shall consist of at least three voting members. When appraising a career appointee's performance or recommending a career appointee for a performance award, more than half of the members must be SES career appointees. The names and titles of the PRB members are as follows:                    

### Primary Members

Angelica E. Ibarguen, Chief Human Capital Officer, EEOC—(Chairperson), Reuben Daniels, Jr., Director, Charlotte District Office, EEOC—(Member), James L. Lee, Deputy General Counsel, EEOC—(Member).

# DATES:

Membership is effective on the date of this notice.

Signed at Washington, DC on this 22nd day of November 2004.

For the Commission.

Cari M. Dominguez,

Chair.

[FR Doc. 04-27855 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
#### § 146.43 Hearings, decisions, post-termination proceedings.

The provisions of 24 CFR part 180 apply to HUD enforcement of this part.

[61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,083
<SECURITIES>                                    20,457
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,220
<INVENTORY>                                        466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,911
<PP&E>                                           2,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                     864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,044
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,456
<SALES>                                          6,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,012
<CGS>                                            1,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,231
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (24)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    954
<INCOME-TAX>                                       258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                696
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
#### § 201.1 Purpose.

These regulations implement the provisions of section 2 of title I of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1703). They contain the requirements under which an approved financial institution may obtain insurance on loans made for the alteration, repair or improvement of property, for the purchase of a manufactured home and/or the lot on which to place such home, for the purchase and installation of fire safety equipment in existing health care facilities, and for the preservation of historic structures. The insurance granted by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall be available only for loans involving property located within a State, as that term is defined in § 201.2. The insurance can cover up to 10 percent of the amount of all insured Title I loans in the financial institution's portfolio, as reflected in the total amount of insurance coverage contained at any time in an insurance coverage reserve account established by the Secretary, less amounts for insurance claims paid. As limited by the amount of insurance coverage in such a reserve account, the insurance can cover up to 90 percent of the loss of any individual loan.

[50 FR 43523, Oct. 25, 1985, as amended at 61 FR 19795, May 2, 1996]
### §4764. Reporting and recordkeeping requirements for State or local governments and other organizations

(a) A State or local government office designated to administer a program or project under this chapter shall make reports and evaluations in such form, at such times, and containing such information concerning the status and application of Federal funds and the operation of the approved program or project as the Office may require, and shall keep and make available such records as may be required by the Office for the verification of such reports and evaluations.

(b) An organization which receives a training grant under section 4744 of this title shall make reports and evaluations in such form, at such times, and containing such information concerning the status and application of Federal grant funds and the operation of the training program as the Office may require, and shall keep and make available such records as may be required by the Office for the verification of such reports and evaluations.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title V, §504, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1926; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), means the provisions of subchapters I, II, III, and IV of this chapter. See section 4761 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Office", meaning Office of Personnel Management, substituted in text for "Commission", meaning Civil Service Commission, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in Civil Service Commission and Chairman thereof to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES

INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAL ROSELLI, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-00404 WHA

DENIAL OF DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

AS A MATTER OF LAW

The jury verdict mooted out the Rule 50 motion as to a number of defendants. As to the

others, the Rule 50 motion (Dkt. No. 601) is denied without prejudice to post-judgment motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 12, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 626 Filed 04/12/10 Page 1 of 1
#### Joseph ELAZARI, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71857.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 15, 2007.

*517Joseph Elazari, Los Angeles, CA, *pro se.*CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Joseph Elazari, a native of Iran and citizen of Israel, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding him ineligible for adjustment of status. We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse his discretion or violate due process by failing to indefinitely suspend proceedings to await Elazari’s possible future eligibility for adjustment of status. *See Biwot v. Gonzales,*403 F.3d 1094, 1099 (9th Cir.2005); *Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (“To prevail on a due process challenge ... [a petitioner] must show error and substantial prejudice.”).

Elazari’s contention that he qualifies as a grandfathered alien under 8 C.F.R. § 245.10 does not change his ineligibility for adjustment of status because he lacks an immediately available immigrant visa. *See 8*C.F.R. § 245.10(b)(2) (permitting grandfathered alien to adjust status if, *inter alia,*he has an immediately available immigrant visa).

Finally, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to remand because the evidence regarding Elazari’s wife’s labor certification did not establish prima facie eligibility for adjustment of status. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 994 (9th Cir.2003). The record does not indicate that Elazari’s wife is the beneficiary of an approved, or even pending, visa petition. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1255(a).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
May 16, 1978



## 78-26 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE DIRECTOR, GENERAL GOVERNMENT DIVISION, PRESIDENT’S REORGANIZATION PROJECT

Reorganization Act—Reorganization Plan Dealing With More Than One Logically Consistent Subject Matter (5 U.S.C. § 905(a)(7))

This responds to your request for our opinion concerning the interpretation to be given the phrase “ dealing with more than one logically consistent subject matter” found in § 905(a)(7) of title 5. This limitation on the content of reorganization plans was first introduced in 1971, see 85 Stat. 576, in order to prevent the submission of plans which contain “ a variety of miscellaneous actions, completely unrelated to one other. . . .” S. Rept. No. 485, 92d Cong., 1st sess. at 5 (1971); H. Rept. No. 146, 92d Cong., 1st sess. at 3 (1971). The legislative history of the 1977 version of the Reorganization Act sheds additional light on the question: Logically consistent subject matter could include: a broad purpose of government such as Economic Development or Natural Resources; a series of similar programs in different agencies, such as Income Maintenance; all functions of a single agency; or crosscutting but identical functions, such as Administration, Budget, legal counsel, et cetera. [H. Rept. No. 105, 95th Cong., 1st sess. at 20 (1977)]. While this broad language may itself be indefinite, it provides at least some guidance concerning the phrase’s intended meaning.

L e o n U l m a n Deputy Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel

106
#### § 1000.42 Are the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 applicable?

No. Recipients shall comply with Indian preference requirements of Section 7(b) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5307(b)), or employment and contract preference laws adopted by the recipient's tribe in accordance with Section 101(k) of NAHASDA.

[85 FR 61568, Sept. 29, 2020]
#### Charles Fisher, appellant, v. Hazel Fisher, appellee.

Bill for divorce by husband on ground of desertion and custody of child. Cross bill by wife. Decree of divorce for wife on ground of extreme and repeated cruelty. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. Louis Bemreuter, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Burton & Burton, for appellant. Willie & Dunham, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
| Addressing World Challenges: The Future ... | Daily Press Briefing | What's New                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Links to Scrolling Headlines                                                                                                                                 |
|                                                                                                                                                              |
|                                                                                                                                                              |
| Under Secretary for Political Affairs > Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs > Releases > Reports > Peru Investigation Report  |

| **Peru Investigation Report: The April 20, 2001 Peruvian Shootdown Accident**   Released by the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement AffairsAugust 2, 2001****

Abbreviations List

**INVESTIGATIVE CHARTER AND METHODOLOGY**

**Summary** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:55:12-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 1414.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the regulations of the Foreign Service Labor Relations Board relating to ex parte communications.
#### Stuart G. Ballin v. Margaret S. Ballin.

Motion to dispense with printing denied, without prejudice to a renewal thereof upon a proper affidavit of merit. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
### §3786. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3786 was editorially reclassified as section 10224 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3786, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §806, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1204, contained provisions similar to those in section 10224 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, prior to repeal by section 609B(e) of Pub. L. 98–473.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2881 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2881

         To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Amino Benzamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2005

  Mr. Chabot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Amino Benzamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-AMINO BENZAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.11.05      Benzamide, 4 Amino  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 2835-68-                                                  31/2008
                         9) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2924.29.75)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Wilson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David A. Wilson                     May 15, 2008
-------------------------------------       Date
David A. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer


                                       28
§ 312.200 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees (see §§ 312.205 through 312.220); and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace (see § 312.225).
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards (see § 312.230).
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No.: CV-09-0883 MHP 

MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS (SBN 118206)

TODD A. NOAH (SBN 152328) 

TED K. JOE (SBN 242589) 

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Tel: (415) 705-6377 

Fax: (415) 705-6383 

E-mail: mdergosits@dergnoah.com 

E-mail: tnoah@dergnoah.com 

E-mail: tjoe@dergnoah.com 

 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 

EXERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLC 

ARTHUR S. BEEMAN (SBN 237996)

PAMELA K. FULMER (SBN 154736) 

BRETT A. LOVEJOY (SBN 212942) 

JONES DAY 

555 California St., 26th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94104-1500 

Telephone: (415) 626-3939 

Facsimile: (415) 875-5787 

email: asbeeman@jonesday.com 

email: pkfulmer@jonesday.com 

email: blovejoy@jonesday.com 

Attorneys for Defendants and 

Counterclaimants 

EDISON MISSION ENERGY and 

MIDWEST GENERATION, LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EXERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

EDISON MISSION ENERGY; and 

MIDWEST GENERATION LLC, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 09-0883-MHP 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case 3:09-cv-00883-MHP Document 50 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

- 2 - 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Case No.: CV-09-0883 MHP 

Exergetic Systems, LLC and Midwest Generation LLC, and Edison Mission Energy, 

(“the Parties”) hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Parties’ Settlement Agreement, executed on 

February 10, 2010. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: February 19, 2010 DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP 

 By: /s/ 

 Michael E. Dergosits 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff and 

 Counterdefendant 

 EXERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLC 

Dated: February 19, 2010 JONES DAY 

 By: /s/ 

 Arthur S. Beeman 

 Attorneys for Defendants and 

 Counterclaimants 

 EDISON MISSION ENERGY and 

 MIDWEST GENERATION LLC 

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 

obtained from Defendants’ counsel, Arthur S. Beeman. 

 

 /s/ 

 Michael E. Dergosits 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February ___, 2010 _________________________ 

 Hon. Marilyn H. Patel 

 United States District Judge 

22

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cv-00883-MHP Document 50 Filed 02/22/10 Page 2 of 2