alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                ---------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,
                                                    1997           1996           1997           1996
                                                ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
DILUTED
Average shares outstanding....................     35,104          9,560          33,552         7,418
Net effect of dilutive stock options(1).......        498             --              --            --
Totals........................................     35,602          9,560          33,552         7,418
Net income (loss).............................    $ 1,161        $(3,525)       $(10,996)      $(8,799)
Net income (loss) per share -- diluted........    $   .03        $ (0.37)       $  (0.33)      $ (1.19)
</TABLE>
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                ---------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,
                                                    1997           1996           1997           1996
                                                ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC
Average shares outstanding....................     35,104          9,560          33,552         7,418
Net income (loss).............................    $ 1,161        $(3,525)       $(10,996)      $(8,799)
Net income (loss) per share -- basic..........    $   .03        $ (0.37)       $  (0.33)      $ (1.19)
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(1) Computed based on the treasury stock method using the average market price
    for each applicable period. Amounts excluded from the 1996 and six month
    1997 computations, since impact is antidilutive.
 
                                       17
|  | **Census 2000 Special      Tabulation on Aging (STA) Population and Housing       Characteristics ** |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

TheSpecial Tabulation on Aging (STA) is a set of 116 population tables and 69 housing    and household tables which were tabulated by the Census Bureau for AoA from    the Census 2000 sample (�longform�) data.  The topics covered inthese tabulations include age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, maritalstatus, income, poverty, disability, and much more. This tabulation provides much more detail on the older population (60+)than is available from other Census sources. 
The data  areorganized by individual tables.  Eachtable includes data for  a state(including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) and data are shown for  a number of geographical levels: U.S.(50 states +DC), state,  Planning andService Area (PSA - the geographic area served by a single area agency on aging), county, countysubdivision in 12 states with a population of 2,500 or more, place with apopulation of 2,500 or more, census tract, as well as American Indian and  AlaskaNative areas.   Also, the urbanand rural components of states and PSAs are shown.The data  are in the form ofExcel tables.  A free Excel viewersoftware may be used by those who do not have Excel. A menu will assist users to select the information that they want. The technical documentationprovides extensive details about such topics as the tabulation specifications,the geographical levels shown,  howto use the statistical tables, and the measures used to protect confidentiality.-  **Proceed to select a table** 
-  **Technical Documentation**  [in pdf format]    - includes a complete listing of the table specifications, the geographic    levels used, and other technical matters      
-  **Download the free Excel viewer**  (needed only if you do not have software    to read an Excel spreadsheet)

**Notes: **- Please        Read: **Things        to Know about the Special Tabulation on Aging**  - Key excepts      from the technical documentation. Note especially the section on confidentiality.  
- If you have difficulty opening the  PDF          file(s) of the Technical Documentation, right+click on the link to the pdf file, save the file          on your computer, and then open the file by double clicking on it from Windows Explorer.   
- This product can be obtained on DVD or CD by contacting    the National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA) by email    at:   **[email protected]**     or by telephone at 734-615-9516  
- The Census Bureau�s  reference for this product is STP 9.
-   Questions about the STA may be emailed to:  **[email protected]** .
#### § 110.30 Effect of failure to display poster.

Any person who claims to have been injured by a discriminatory housing practice may file a complaint with the Secretary pursuant to part 105 of this chapter. A failure to display the fair housing poster as required by this part shall be deemed prima facie evidence of a discriminatory housing practice.

[37 FR 3429, Feb. 16, 1972]
§ 96.33 Budget, audit, insurance, and risk assessment requirements. ( a ) The agency or person operates under a budget approved by its governing body, if applicable, for management of its funds. The budget discloses all remuneration (including perquisites) paid to the agency's or person's board of directors, managers, employees, and supervised providers.
( b ) The agency's or person's finances are subject to annual internal review and oversight and are subject to independent audits every four years. The agency or person submits copies of internal financial review reports for inspection by the accrediting entity each year.
( c ) The agency or person submits copies of each audit, as well as any accompanying management letter or qualified opinion letter, for inspection by the accrediting entity.
( d ) The agency or person meets the financial reporting requirements of Federal and State laws and regulations.
( e ) The agency's or person's balance sheets show that it operates on a sound financial basis and maintains on average sufficient cash reserves, assets, or other financial resources to meet its operating expenses for two months, taking into account its projected volume of cases and its size, scope, and financial commitments. The agency or person has a plan to transfer its intercountry adoption cases if it ceases to provide or is no longer permitted to provide adoption services in intercountry adoption cases. The plan includes provisions for an organized closure and reimbursement to clients of funds paid for services not yet rendered.
( f ) If it accepts charitable donations, the agency or person has safeguards in place to ensure that such donations do not influence child placement decisions in any way.
( g ) The agency or person assesses the risks it assumes, including by reviewing information on the availability of insurance coverage for intercountry adoption-related activities. The agency or person uses the assessment to meet the requirements in paragraph (h) of this section and as the basis for determining the type and amount of professional, general, directors' and officers', errors and omissions, and other liability insurance to carry.
( h ) The agency or person maintains professional liability insurance in amounts reasonably related to its exposure to risk, but in no case in an amount less than $1,000,000 in the aggregate.
( i ) The agency's or person's chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and other officers or employees with direct responsibility for financial transactions or financial management of the agency or person are bonded.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40634, July 14, 2014]
### §4854. Research on lead exposure from other sources

The Secretary, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, shall conduct research on strategies to reduce the risk of lead exposure from other sources, including exterior soil and interior lead dust in carpets, furniture, and forced air ducts.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1051, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3925.)
#### § 19.5-1 Notification from participant or annuitant.

If a participant or former participant becomes divorced on or after February 15, 1981, he/she shall notify the Department (PER/ER/RET) of the divorce on or prior to its effective date. The notice shall include the effective date of the divorce, the full name, mailing address, and date of birth of the former spouse and the date of the member's marriage to that person, and enclose a certified copy of the divorce decree. If there is a court order or spousal agreement concerning payment or nonpayment of Foreign Service benefits to the former spouse, the original or a certified copy of the order or agreement shall also be forwarded to PER/ER/RET. In the absence of a court order or spousal agreement providing otherwise, the Department will pay a pro rata share of the member's benefits to the former spouse. (A former spouse of a former participant who separated from the Service on or before February 15, 1981 is not eligible for a pension under § 19.9, *i.e.*, not eligible for a pro rata share of the principal's annuity.) Upon receipt of notice of a divorce, a court order, or spousal agreement, the Department will proceed as indicated in § 19.6 or § 19.7. Delinquent notice to the Department of the divorce of an annuitant will result in retroactive payments to any qualified former spouse to the extent that the retroactive payments can be deducted from future annuity payments to the principal as stated in § 19.6-4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert P. Pinkas, Chief Executive Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                /s/ Robert P. Pinkas
                                -------------------------
                                Robert P. Pinkas
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                November 14, 2003
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Ben Borris, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 28,288.

Charge of violation of section 14, chapter 65a, Cahill’s Revised Statutes 1921, p. 1895, in that defendant failed to keep a register of guests in his hotel. Finding of guilty and fine of $50. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Daniel P. Trude, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1923.

Reversed.

Opinion filed June 25, 1923.

Litsinger, Healy & Reid, for plaintiff in error. Robert E. Crowe, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson and Clyde C. Fisher, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 103.10 What can I do if I believe someone is discriminating against me in the sale, rental, finance, or advertisement of housing?

You can notify HUD if you believe there has been discrimination against you in any activity related to housing because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or the presence of children under the age of 18 in a household.

[64 FR 18540, Apr. 14, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY McLAUGHLIN,

Petitioner,

v.

BEN CURRY, warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-5599 SI (pr)

ORDER PERMITTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions, Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22,

2010) (en banc). The court will provide each party an opportunity to submit a supplemental brief (not

to exceed 15 pages in length) explaining his views of how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this

parole denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule:

1. No later than May 10, 2010, respondent must send to petitioner a copy of the Hayward

en banc decision. 

2. No later than May 28, 2010, respondent must file and serve any supplemental brief on

the impact of Hayward on this action. 

3. No later than July 2, 2010, petitioner must file and serve any supplemental brief on the

impact of Hayward on this action. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 27, 2010 

 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05599-SI Document 6 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 1
### §4652. Buildings, structures, and improvements

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the head of a Federal agency acquires any interest in real property in any State, he shall acquire at least an equal interest in all buildings, structures, or other improvements located upon the real property so acquired and which he requires to be removed from such real property or which he determines will be adversely affected by the use to which such real property will be put.

(b)(1) For the purpose of determining the just compensation to be paid for any building, structure, or other improvement required to be acquired by subsection (a) of this section, such building, structure, or other improvement shall be deemed to be a part of the real property to be acquired notwithstanding the right or obligation of a tenant, as against the owner of any other interest in the real property, to remove such building, structure, or improvement at the expiration of his term, and the fair market value which such building, structure, or improvement contributes to the fair market value of the real property to be acquired, or the fair market value of such building, structure, or improvement for removal from the real property, whichever is the greater, shall be paid to the tenant therefor.

(2) Payment under this subsection shall not result in duplication of any payments otherwise authorized by law. No such payment shall be made unless the owner of the land involved disclaims all interest in the improvements of the tenant. In consideration for any such payment, the tenant shall assign, transfer, and release to the United States all his right, title, and interest in and to such improvements. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to deprive the tenant of any rights to reject payment under this subsection and to obtain payment for such property interests in accordance with applicable law, other than this subsection.

(Pub. L. 91–646, title III, §302, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1905.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

STIPULATION REGARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES MOTION 

CASE NO. 08-CV-4149 

SFCA_1691149.1 

KAHN BROWN & POORE LLP 

30 FIFTH STREET, SECOND FLOOR 

PETALUMA, CA 94952 

TELEPHONE: 707.763.7100 

FACSIMILE: 707.763.7180 

DAVID M. POORE, CA BAR NO. 192541, dpoore@kahnbrownlaw.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TSEGAI HAILE

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

ONE MARITIME PLAZA, SUITE 600 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3404 

TELEPHONE: 415.434.4484 

FACSIMILE: 415.434.4507 

KEVIN F. WOODALL, CA BAR NO. 180650, kwoodall@foley.com 

CHRISTOPHER G. WARD, CA BAR NO. 238777, cward@foley.com 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

TSEGAI HAILE 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL 

HOSPITAL; ST. JOSEPH HEALTH 

SYSTEM SONOMA COUNTY, and 

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 08-CV-4149 

STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEFENDANT 

SANTA ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 

ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE MOTION 

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES; ORDER

THEREON

TRIAL DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 2010 

JUDGE: HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

WHEREAS, Local Rule 54 provides that motions for attorney’s fees must be 

made no later than 14 days after entry of judgment, unless the Court orders 

otherwise; 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial 

Hospital should have an additional 30 days to file a motion for attorney’s fees, as 

the parties are discussing and negotiating their respective positions on this and 

Case 3:08-cv-04149-MMC Document 171 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

STIPULATION REGARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES MOTION 

CASE NO. 08-CV-4149 

SFCA_1691149.1 

other matters; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Tsegai Haile, and 

Defendant, Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, through their counsel of record, that 

Defendant, Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, will have until April 9, 2010 to file a 

motion for attorney’s fees under Local Rule 54. 

DATED: MARCH 9, 2010 KAHN BROWN & POORE LLP

DAVID M. POORE

/s/David M. Poore 

DAVID M. POORE

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF TSEGAI 

HAILE

DATED: MARCH 9, 2010 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 

KEVIN F. WOODALL

CHRISTOPHER G. WARD

/s/Christopher G. Ward

CHRISTOPHER G. WARD

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SANTA 

ROSA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

ORDER

For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, Santa 

Rosa Memorial Hospital, shall have until April 9, 2010 to file a motion for 

attorney’s fees under Local Rule 54. 

Date Hon. Maxine Chesney 

March 10, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04149-MMC Document 171 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GAIL SHIFMAN

Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 147334

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3850

San Francisco CA 94104

Tel.: 415.551.1500

Fax: 415.551.1502

E-Mail: gail@shifmangroup.com

Attorney for Defendant

SHERRY HARRINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

- - OO - - 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. CR 09-0569 MHP

 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED]

ORDER EXONERATING BOND

vs. AND RETURNING PASSPORT

 

SHERRY HARRINGTON

 

 Defendant.

_____________________________/

 

Having been sentenced on January 25,2010, Defendant Sherry

Harrington’s bail is exonerated. The Clerk’s Office shall return

her passport.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 25, 2010 ___________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-00569-MHP Document 32 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1006.210 Which nonprocurement transactions are covered transactions?

All nonprocurement transactions, as defined in § 1006.970, are covered transactions unless listed in § 1006.215. (See appendix to this part.)
#### § 231.12 Prosecution of claims.

After payment by USAID to an Applicant hereunder, USAID shall have exclusive power to prosecute all claims related to rights to receive payments under the Eligible Notes to which it is thereby subrogated. If a Noteholder continues to have an interest in the outstanding Eligible Notes, such a Noteholder and USAID shall consult with each other with respect to their respective interests in such Eligible Notes and the manner of and responsibility for prosecuting claims.
§ 1003.700 Review of grantee's performance. ( a ) *Objective.* HUD will review each grantee's performance to determine whether the grantee has: ( 1 ) Complied with the requirements of the Act, this part, the grant agreement and other applicable laws and regulations;
( 2 ) Carried out its activities substantially as described in its application;
( 3 ) Made substantial progress in carrying out its approved program;
( 4 ) A continuing capacity to carry out the approved activities in a timely manner; and
( 5 ) The capacity to undertake additional activities funded under this part.
( b ) *Basis for review.* In reviewing each grantee's performance, HUD will consider all available evidence which may include, but not be limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The approved application and any amendments thereto;
( 2 ) Reports prepared by the grantee;
( 3 ) Records maintained by the grantee;
( 4 ) Results of HUD's monitoring of the grantee's performance, including field evaluation of the quality of the work performed;
( 5 ) Audit reports;
( 6 ) Records of drawdowns on the line of credit;
( 7 ) Records of comments and complaints by citizens and organizations; and
( 8 ) Litigation.