alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARMAIN ABRAZADO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 10-0927 MMC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On June 25, 2010, plaintiff failed to appear as ordered at a regularly scheduled Case

Management Conference in the above-entitled action. By its Order to Show Cause issued

June 25, 2010, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause, in writing filed no later than July 9,

2010, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)

for failure to prosecute. No response has been filed by plaintiff.

No good cause having been shown for plaintiff's failure to appear, the Court hereby

orders the action DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

The clerk shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2010 /s/ Vaughn R. Walker 

VAUGHN R WALKER for

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00069-MMC Document 16 Filed 07/20/10 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case No. CV-08-2142-JF

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO FILE

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

KAREN L. JONES-BOYLE, individually, and on

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA and

JPMORGAN CHASE, N.A.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV-08-2142-JF

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:

STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

On June 25, 2010, this Court heard the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant

JPMorgan Chase, N.A. and the motion to dismiss and motion to strike filed by Defendant

Washington Mutual Bank, FA and FDIC-Receiver. On July 8, 2010, this Court entered an order

granting the motions to dismiss with leave to amend in part wherein Plaintiff was allowed twenty

(20) days to file and serve any amended pleading.

Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED, the Court will allow Plaintiff up to and including August 25, 2010 to file her Third

Amended Complaint in this matter, and the Court will allow Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. up

to and including September 22, 2010 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Third

Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:________________

The Honorable Jeremy Fogel

United States District Judge

**E-Filed 7/30/2010**

------------------

7/30/2010

Case 3:08-cv-02142-EMC Document 121 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 1
Third Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.3

 THIRD AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT 

This THIRD AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT, dated November 4, 2010, is by and between CIRCOR, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), and Paul M. Coppinger (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive entered into an executive change in control agreement made as of August 1, 2001, as amended on December 7, 2001 and December 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to increase the benefits to which the Executive may become entitled to upon a Change in Control (as defined
in the Agreement). 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, do mutually
covenant and agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “one
(1) times” with the following: 
 “two (2) times” 

2. Section 3(a)(iv) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “one (1) year” with the following:

 “two (2) years” 
 3. The Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect as to all other provisions under said Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  


			
	CIRCOR, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ A. William Higgins

	Name:	 	A. William Higgins
	Title:	 	Chairman, President & CEO
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Paul M. Coppinger

	Paul M. Coppinger
§ 513.600 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to carry out the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 by requiring that— ( 1 ) A grantee, other than an individual, shall certify to the Board that it will provide a drug-free workplace;
( 2 ) A grantee who is an individual shall certify to the Board that, as a condition of the grant, he or she will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant.
( b ) Requirements implementing the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 for contractors with the Board are found at 48 CFR subparts 9.4, 23.5, and 52.2.
FEDERAL AVIATION • ADMINISTRATION 

COMPLIANCE WITH E.O. 12866 

Section 6(a)(3)(E) ofE.O. 12866 requires agencies to identify for the public, in 

a complete, clear, and simple manner, those changes in a regulatory action 

made at the suggestion or recommendation of the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management and Budget. 

Title of Rulemaking: 

Regulatory Identification Number: 

Attachment 

OIRA did not review the rulemaking document. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, but did not 

suggest or recommend any changes. 

OIRA reviewed the rulemaking document, and we have 

documented the changes we made at OIRA's suggestion or 

recommendation in an attachment to this sheet. 

Date
#### Vincent Castaldo et al., Respondents, v. Elija Olkon, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for a stay of the trial, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the January Term, beginning January 3, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before December 19, 1960. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Office of Research and Development, VA.

# ACTION:

Notice of government owned invention available for licensing.

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of federally funded research and development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for licensing.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Technical and licensing information on the invention may be obtained by writing to: Mindy L. Aisen, M.D., Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Technology Transfer Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420; fax: (202) 254-0255; email:                         *mindy.aisen@mail.va.gov.*                         Any request for information should include the number and title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The invention available for licensing is: U.S. Patent Application No. 10/867,951 “A Novel Specific Inhibitor of the Cyclin Kinase Inhibitor p21UWaf1/Cip1                     and Methods of Using the Inhibitor.”                

Dated: December 13, 2004.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 04-28037 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           3,725
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,153,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (94,477)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,456,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,613,256
<PP&E>                                       4,716,467
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,516,169)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,426,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,316,599
<BONDS>                                      4,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,670
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,560,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,426,455
<SALES>                                     31,531,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,531,937
<CGS>                                       10,701,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,701,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,863,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             598,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,369,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                   995,196
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,374,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                218,699
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,155,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
§ 1005.106 What is the Direct Guarantee procedure? ( a ) *General.* A loan may be processed under a Direct Guarantee procedure approved by the Department, under which the Department does not issue commitments to guarantee or review applications for loan guarantees before mortgages are executed by lenders approved for Direct Guarantee processing. The Department will approve a loan before the loan is guaranteed.
( b ) *Mortgagee sanctions.* Depending on the nature and extent of the noncompliance with the requirements applicable to the Direct Guarantee procedure, as determined by the Department, the Department may take such actions as are deemed appropriate and in accordance with published guidelines.
[63 FR 48990, Sept. 11, 1998]
### §7421. Consultation

In carrying out the requirements of this chapter requiring applicable implementation plans to contain—

(1) any transportation controls, air quality maintenance plan requirements or preconstruction review of direct sources of air pollution, or

(2) any measure referred to—

(A) in part D (pertaining to nonattainment requirements), or

(B) in part C (pertaining to prevention of significant deterioration),

and in carrying out the requirements of section 7413(d) 1 of this title (relating to certain enforcement orders), the State shall provide a satisfactory process of consultation with general purpose local governments, designated organizations of elected officials of local governments and any Federal land manager having authority over Federal land to which the State plan applies, effective with respect to any such requirement which is adopted more than one year after August 7, 1977, as part of such plan. Such process shall be in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Administrator to assure adequate consultation. The Administrator shall update as necessary the original regulations required and promulgated under this section (as in effect immediately before November 15, 1990) to ensure adequate consultation. Only a general purpose unit of local government, regional agency, or council of governments adversely affected by action of the Administrator approving any portion of a plan referred to in this subsection 2 may petition for judicial review of such action on the basis of a violation of the requirements of this section.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §121, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §119, Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 719; amended Pub. L. 101–549, title I, §108(h), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2467.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 7413(d) of this title, referred to in text, was amended generally by Pub. L. 101–549, title VII, §701, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2672, and, as so amended, no longer relates to final compliance orders.

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–549 amended penultimate sentence generally. Prior to amendment, penultimate sentence read as follows: "Such regulations shall be promulgated after notice and opportunity for public hearing and not later than 6 months after August 7, 1977."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 7, 1977, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 406(d) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.

2 So in original.
AFS-16-2-E 

December 16, 2015 

 Exemption No. 10411B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8750 

Mr. Jason M. Smith, GS-12, DAF 

Director, Credentialing Programs and Co-Chair, JSAMTCC 

Community College of the Air Force 

CCAF/DEAL 

100 South Turner Boulevard 

Maxwell AFB, Gunter Annex, AL 36114-3011 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 

10411, as amended. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the date the 

exemption ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated September 9, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of the Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) for an extension of Exemption 

No. 10411, as amended. That exemption from § 147.31(c)(2)(iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) allows CCAF to permit U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance 

technicians who have completed military aviation maintenance training courses to be 

evaluated using the same criteria used for the civilian sector. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to CCAF. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10411, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the 

FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant the Community College of the Air 

Force (CCAF) an exemption from § 147.31(c)(2)(iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR), to allow CCAF to permit U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance technicians who 

have completed military aviation maintenance training courses to be evaluated using the same 

criteria used for the civilian sector. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

//s// 

John Barbagallo 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
```

[106th Congress Private Law 7]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl007.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3098]]

Private Law 106-7
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2000 -  [S. 
                                 302]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
                            NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) <<NOTE: Clifton Christian. Linette Christian.>>  In General.--In 
the administration of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Kerantha 
Poole-Christian shall be classified as a child within the meaning of 
section 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon approval of a petition filed on 
her behalf by Clifton or Linette Christian, citizens of the United 
States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.

    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Kerantha Poole-Christian shall, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.

    Approved October 13, 2000.
```
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11

                          TRANSCEND THERAPEUTICS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Period ended Sept. 30, 1997
                                                       ---------------------------------------
                                                        Nine Mos.                   Three Mos.
                                                       ---------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>                         <C>         
Common stock outstanding beginning of period              779,381                      791,806
Weighted average common stock issued during
the period                                                611,015                    1,800,000
Weighted average common stock issued from
conversion of preferred stock to common stock,
net                                                     3,122,167                    3,122,167
                                                       ---------------------------------------
Weighted average common shares outstanding              4,512,563                    5,713,973
                                                       =======================================
Net income (loss)                                      $  179,929                  $(1,258,599)
Accretion of Redeemable Non-convertible
Preferred Stock                                          (178,000)                     (59,333)
                                                       ---------------------------------------
Net income (loss) to common stockholders               $    1,929                  $(1,317,932)
                                                       ---------------------------------------
Net income (loss) per common share                     $     0.00                  $     (0.23)
</TABLE>



                                       15
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00274-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.L., III, D.L., D.A.R. and D.G., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00708

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order terminating 

appellant’s parental rights is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against 

appellant in relation to this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED October 23, 2019.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
### §6704. Grants providing State or local contributions required under State or local law

In addition to the grants otherwise authorized by this chapter, the Secretary is authorized to make a grant for the purpose of providing all or any portion of the required State or local share of the cost of any public works project for which financial assistance is authorized under any provision of State or local law requiring such contribution. Any grant made for a public works project under this section shall be made in such amount as may be necessary to provide the requested State or local share of the cost of such project. A grant shall be made under this section for either the State or local share of the cost of the project, but not both shares. No grant shall be made for a project under this section unless the share of the financial assistance for such project (other than the share with respect to which a grant is requested under this section) is immediately available for such project and construction of such project has not yet been initiated.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title I, §105, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 999.)
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 05-2854 DR. JOSÉ S. BELAVAL, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.; CONCILIO DE SALUD INTEGRAL DE LOIZA, INC., Plaintiffs,

v. HON. ROSA PERÉZ-PERDOMO, Secretary, Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Defendant/Appellee, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary, United States

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on October 2, 2006 is amended as follows: On page 5, line 12, replace the italicized word " that " with the underlined word "that". On page 6, l i n e 23, replace the word "1st" with the numeral "1". On page 7, line 15, replace "1292(a)" with "1292(a)(1)". On page 7, line 19, replace "1292(a)" with "1292(a)(1)". On page 9, line 10, delete one of the two spaces between "884- 85" and "(10th Cir. 1968)".