alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2448 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DEMT. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on DEMT. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEMT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 DEMT) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 511.6 Board authority to adjust, determine, compromise, and settle claims and limitations upon that authority. ( a ) The General Counsel of the Board, or his/her designee, is delegated authority to consider, ascertain, adjust, determine, compromise, and settle claims asserted under the provisions of section 2672 of the Act and under this part.
( b ) Limitation on Board authority: An award, compromise, or settlement of a claim by the Board under the provisions of section 2672 of the Act, in excess of $25,000, shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney General or his/her designee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Scott, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 5, 1976, convicting defendant upon a plea of guilty to attempted robbery in the first degree and sentencing defendant as a predicate felon to an indeterminate term of three and one-half to seven years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed. Defendant urges on appeal that he did not fully appreciate or understand the consequences of his guilty plea. He alleges a defect in the plea resulting from the failure of the court to inquire adequately as to the circumstances of the crime *(People v Serrano,*15 NY2d 304). It is fairly apparent that the court should have conducted a more complete and extensive inquiry as to the circumstances underlying the commission of the crime. Although at the time sentence was to be imposed, defendant made a statement somewhat inconsistent with his prior guilty plea, we perceive no error under the facts and circumstances here. The statement was made in conjunction with and to support defendant’s request that the court impose a sentence of probation. Moreover, it is clear that the court inquired at the time of sentence whether defendant wished to withdraw his guilty plea and proceed to trial. Defendant declined to do so and requested that sentence be imposed. We have examined and reject as lacking in merit defendant’s remaining contention that the sentence imposed was excessive and an abuse of discretion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-1007 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DIPLOMATIC PROPERTIES 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MOZAMBIQUE 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Maputo September 21 and October 7, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MOZAMBIQUE 

Diplomatic Properties 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Maputo 

 September 21 and October 7, 2005; 

 Entered into force October 7, 2005.
#### § 504.9 Final determinations.

The General Counsel makes the final determination on demands or requests to employees for production of official records and information or testimony in litigation in which the BBG is not a party. All final determinations are within the sole discretion of the General Counsel. The General Counsel will notify the requester and, when appropriate, the court or other competent authority of the final determination, the reasons for the grant or denial of the request, and any conditions that the General Counsel may impose on the release of records or information, or on the testimony of an BBG employee. The General Counsel's decision exhausts administrative remedies for discovery of the information.
#### Devender SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-76892.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007.*

Filed March 15, 2007.

Martin Avila Robles, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jennifer Levings, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Devender Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his *538motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Singh’s due process contention because he failed to raise the issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §2160b. Authority to suspend nuclear cooperation with nations which have not ratified the Convention on the Physical Security of Nuclear Material

The President may suspend nuclear cooperation under this chapter with any nation or group of nations which has not ratified the Convention on the Physical Security of Nuclear Material.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §132, as added Pub. L. 99–399, title VI, §602, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 875; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, known as the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of this title and Tables.
§ 1411.2 Delegation of authority. ( a ) *Foreign Service Labor Relations Board/General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations Authority.* Regional Directors of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the Freedom of Information Officer of the Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, and the Solicitor of the Federal Labor Relations Authority are delegated the exclusive authority to act upon all requests for information, documents and records which are received from any person or organization under § 1411.4(a).
( b ) *Foreign Service Impasse Disputes Panel.* The Executive Director of the Federal Service Impasses Panel is delegated the exclusive authority to act upon all requests for information, documents and records which are received from any person or organization under § 1411.4(b).
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 August 13, 2004

Before
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

NATHANIEL LINDELL, ] Appeals from the United Plaintiff-Appellant, ] States District Court for Cross-Appellee, ] the Western District of ] Wisconsin. No. 03-2651 and 03-2765 v. ] ] No. 02 C 21 MATTHEW J. FRANK, et al., ] Defendants-Appellees, ] Barbara B. Crabb, Cross-Appellants, ] Chief Judge. ] and ] ] CINDY O'DONNELL, et al., ] Defendants-Appellees. ]
Upon consideration of the MOTION BY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THE COURT’S JULY 19, 2004 PUBLISHED OPINION , filed on August 5, 2004, by counsel for the appellees/cross-appellants,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED . The reference to Wis. Admin. Code Doc 309.95(2)(a) on Page 6 of the slip opinion issued on July 19, 2004, shall be changed to Wis. Admin. Code Doc 309.05(2)(a).
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28103]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Materials Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    The Materials Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) will meet on 
January 27, 2005, 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 
3884, 14th Street between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., 
Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions 
that affect the level of export controls applicable to advanced 
materials and related technology.
    Agenda:
    1. Opening remarks.
    2. Presentation of papers and comments by the public.
    3. Review of Chemical Weapons Convention Schedules.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to 
the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before 
or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Lee Ann 
Carpenter at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e9a58a889b998c879da98b809ac78d868ac78e869f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d995bab8aba9bcb7ad99bbb0aaf7bdb6baf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information contact Lee Ann Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

    Dated: December 20, 2004.
Lee Ann Carpenter,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-28103 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

The Court would like to have a short telephone conference with counsel at 9:00 A.M. ON

MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2010. Plaintiff’s counsel are requested to set up the telephone call and then

contact the Court at 415-522-3684 when all parties are present. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 9, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02487-WHA Document 42 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 51.23 Identity of applicant. ( a ) The applicant has the burden of establishing his or her identity.
( b ) The applicant must establish his or her identity by the submission of a previous passport, other state, local, or federal government officially issued identification with photograph, or other identifying evidence which may include an affidavit of an identifying witness.
( c ) The Department may require such additional evidence of identity as it deems necessary.
#### Empire State Mortgagee Corp., Respondent, v. Morris Goodman et al., Appellants.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellants perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’ brief must be served and filed on or before February 9, 1961. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2630 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 339
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2630

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           December 16, 2005

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1927 Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``J.M. 
                      Dietrich Northeast Annex''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1927 
Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, Illinois, and known as the Northeast 
Annex, shall be known and designated as the ``J.M. Dietrich Northeast 
Annex''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.M. Dietrich Northeast 
Annex''.
                                                       Calendar No. 339

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2630

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 1927 Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``J.M. 
                      Dietrich Northeast Annex''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 16, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### T. W. Hay, appellant, v. John Collard, appellee.

Suit for balance due on city lot. Verdict for defendant. Judgment in accordance therewith. Appeal from the Circuit Court of White county; the Hon. Julius C. Kern, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 2, 1923.

Richard Spieknall, Jr., for appellant. Joe A. Pearce, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barry

delivered the opinion of the court.
| home

about us

fish &            wildlife

energy

news

reports &            papers

contact us |  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|   EnergyPower Plan |
|-------------------------|
|                    | Demand Response Issue Paper for Fifth Power Plan
**Council document 2002-18   |        December 2002**

Read comments from:
- PNGC Power, Eugene, Rosolie  (30k PDF)
**Summary**
This issue paper examines demand response in the retail market for      electricity.  It begins by explaining why demand response is      important, why it has been deficient in the past, and how that deficiency      has become more serious with the current electrical industry structure.

The paper then explains that ?demand response,? as it is used here,      is not ?conservation? as the Council has used the term.  It      discusses how the difference affects the kinds of policy goals we can      consider.

The paper describes and evaluates the main options for increasing      demand response.  It begins with real-time pricing, which offers a      number of advantages in principle, but faces a number of obstacles that      rule out quick and widespread adoption.  It examines time-of-use      pricing, which faces somewhat fewer obstacles and offers somewhat less      promise.  The paper then moves to a number of forms of payment for      reductions in use, which have been adopted fairly widely in our region and      elsewhere.  The payment for reductions options are more familiar and      enjoy more acceptance, but have transactions costs and limited participant      pools.

Next, the issue paper proposes to estimate the potential amount of      demand response in the region, and the value of achieving that potential.

Finally, the paper invites comments on the issue in general and some      aspects of the issue in particular.      
read full document >(50k      PDF)
Documents in Acrobat PDF format            require the Acrobat reader plugin  **             Comment on this report**
[Comment period is past.]

Send comments by February 7, 2003 to:

Mark Walker            Director of Public Affairs            Northwest Power Planning Council            851 SW 6th Avenue, Suite 1100            Portland, Oregon  97204-1348                         or email                
   |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

SHAWN HALBERT

Assistant Federal Public Defender

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant Osvaldo Elioso Torres

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

OSVALDO ELIOSO TORRES,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-0784 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

DATE

The parties are scheduled to appear before this Court for sentencing on March 26, 2010. Due

to the workload of the probation officer assigned to the case, Mr. Elioso Torres has not yet been

interviewed. So that Mr. Elioso Torres may be interviewed prior to the preparation of a draft

presentence investigation report, the defense requests that the sentencing be continued to May 21,

2010 or some other date convenient to the Court. In light of the above, the government has no 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

STIP. & ORDER CONT. SENT. DATE

CR 09-0784 SI - 1 -

Case 3:09-cr-00784-SI Document 22 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

objection to the request.

SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

DATED: March 18, 2010 /s/ 

KEVIN BARRY

Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: March 18, 2010 /s/ 

SHAWN HALBERT

Assistant Federal Public Defender

ORDER

For the reasons stated above, the Court hereby continues the sentencing hearing from March 26,

2010, to May 21, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _______________________________________

 THE HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Court

STIP. & ORDER CONT. SENT. DATE

CR 09-0784 SI - 2 -

Case 3:09-cr-00784-SI Document 22 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 51.29 Attorney or other third-party assistance.

A person seeking passport services may be physically accompanied by an attorney, interpreter, or other third party of their own choice at their own expense in accordance with 22 CFR 50.52.

[89 FR 41311, May 13, 2024]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2772 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2772

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4 [(4 amino phenyl) azo] 
                benzene sulfonic acid, monosodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4 [(4 amino phenyl) azo] 
                benzene sulfonic acid, monosodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4 [(4 AMINO PHENYL) AZO] BENZENE SULFONIC ACID, MONOSODIUM 
              SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.40 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4 [(4 amino phenyl) azo] 
benzene sulfonic acid, monosodium salt) is amended by striking ``12/31/
2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30925

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TERRANCE TREMAINE GANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(6:03-CR-60046-5)

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Terrance Tremaine Gant appeals the

sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess

and distribute cocaine and cocaine base. Relying on United States

v. Cunningham, 429 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 2005), he contends that the

district court erred as a matter of law in (1) imposing an

unreasonable guidelines sentence under the facts of his case and
1

United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

2

(2) doing so without first considering, in response to his request

for a sentence below the applicable range, whether a guidelines

sentence actually conformed to the statutory factors set forth in

18 U.S.C. § 3553. 

We review sentences imposed post-Booker,

1

only for

“unreasonableness.” United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 518 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005) (internal quotation marks

and citation omitted). Gant does not dispute that his sentence

fell within a correctly calculated guidelines range, and thus is

presumptively reasonable. United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551,

554 (5th Cir. 2006). As our review of the sentencing transcript

reveals that the district court meaningfully considered the § 3553

factors in fashioning Gant’s sentence, he has not rebutted that

presumption. See id. Gant’s reliance on Seventh Circuit authority

is therefore unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
### §3797u–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797u–4 was editorially reclassified as section 10615 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.