alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

U

For the Northern District of California

NITED 

STATES 

DISTRICT 

COURT

For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of California

ELIZABETH KARNAZES,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________________/

No. C 09-0767 MMC (MEJ)

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S

APRIL 6, 2010 LETTER

On April 6, 2010, Plaintiff Elizabeth Karnazes filed a discovery dispute letter. (Dkt. #57.) 

As Plaintiff’s letter does not comply with the undersigned’s discovery standing order, the Court

hereby STRIKES Plaintiff’s letter. Plaintiff is reminded that any future failure to comply with the

discovery standing order on her part may result in the imposition of sanctions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 6, 2010 _______________________________

Maria-Elena James 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-00767-MMC Document 58 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 6 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

03/22/10

Case 3:08-cv-05651-TEH Document 47 Filed 03/22/10 Page 7 of 7
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.85 Covenant against liens. ( a ) The mortgage shall contain a covenant against the creation by the mortgagor of liens against the property superior or inferior to the lien of the mortgage except for such inferior lien as may be approved by the Commissioner in accordance with provisions of § 200.71; and
( b ) A covenant against repayment of a Commissioner approved inferior lien from mortgage proceeds other than surplus cash or residual receipts, except in the case of an inferior lien created by an operating loss loan insured pursuant to section 223(d) of the Act, or a supplemental loan insured pursuant to section 241 of the Act.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 91]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ091.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 988]]

Public Law 110-91
110th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Increasing the statutory limit on the public debt. <<NOTE: Sept. 29, 
                        2007 -  [H.J. Res. 43]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That subsection (b) of section 
3101 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by striking out the 
dollar limitation contained in such subsection and inserting in lieu 
thereof $9,815,000,000,000.

    Approved September 29, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 43:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110-184 (Comm. on Finance).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            May 17, considered and passed House pursuant to S. Con. Res. 
                21.
            Sept. 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2628 

To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable, tamper-resistant 

entry and exit documents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2005 

Mr. FLAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable, 

tamper-resistant entry and exit documents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEADLINES FOR 

4 MACHINE-READABLE, TAMPER-RESISTANT 

5 ENTRY AND EXIT DOCUMENTS. 

6 Section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and 

7 Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (8 U.S.C. 1732) is amend-
2 

•HR 2628 IH 

1 ed, in each of subsections (b)(2)(A), (c)(1), and (c)(2), by 

2 striking ‘‘2005,’’ and inserting ‘‘2006,’’. 

Æ
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OAKLAND DIVISION 

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN 

INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, FEDERAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, ILLINOIS UNION 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1-100, 

 Defendants. 

Case No: C 08-5686 SBA 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR 

MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING 

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Docket 66 

Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Shorten Time for Motion to Continue Hearing on 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, which is scheduled for hearing on March 2, 2010. 

However, a noticed motion is unnecessary for an application for an order shortening time. See Civ. 

L.R. 6-3. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s Motion to Shorten Time for Motion to 

Continue Hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket 66) is DENIED as 

moot. Defendants’ summary judgment motions shall be held in abeyance pending resolution of the 

motion to continue the hearing date on the summary judgment motions. This Order terminates 

Docket No. 66. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 10, 2010 ____________________________ 

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-05686-RS Document 90 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank B. Patterson, Also Known as Bennie Rouse, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant *817from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered November 21, 1975, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The count charging criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, committed by possession of a dangerous instrument, was an inclusory concurrent count of robbery in the first degree, committed by using and threatening the use of the same dangerous instrument (see *People v Strawder,*54 AD2d 743) and of assault in the second degree, in which the injuries were inflicted by means of the same dangerous instrument (see Penal Law, § 120.05, subd 2). Since defendant could not have committed robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree without concomitantly having committed criminal possession of a weapon, it was improper to convict him of all three offenses. Accordingly, the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon must be reversed and the said count dismissed (see *People v Grier,*37 NY2d 847). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
AFS-13-423-E

July 11, 2013

 Exemption No. 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0551

Mr. Rick LaCava

Parent of Rebecca LaCava

8434 Peony Circle

Buena Park, CA 90620

Dear Mr. LaCava:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received June 18, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Rebecca LaCava for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Rebecca to exceed 

the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured 

by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United 

States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Rebecca.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Rebecca LaCava an exemption from § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Rebecca is

aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary 

to allow her to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Rebecca’s parents

or a caregiver accompanying her. Rebecca LaCava may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind her. In addition, Rebecca’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of 

this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
§ 180.645 Exhibits. ( a ) *Identification.* All exhibits offered into evidence shall be numbered sequentially and marked with a designation identifying the sponsor. The original of each exhibit offered in evidence or marked for identification shall be filed and retained in the docket of the proceeding, unless the ALJ permits the substitution of a copy for the original.
( b ) *Exchange of exhibits.* One copy of each exhibit offered into evidence must be furnished to each of the parties and to the ALJ. If the ALJ does not fix a time for the exchange of exhibits, the parties shall exchange copies of proposed exhibits at the earliest practicable time before the commencement of the hearing. Exhibits submitted as rebuttal evidence are not required to be exchanged before the commencement of the hearing if the submission of such evidence could not reasonably be anticipated at that time.
( c ) *Authenticity.* The authenticity of all documents submitted or exchanged as proposed exhibits prior to the hearing shall be admitted unless written objection is filed before the commencement of the hearing, or unless good cause is shown for failing to file such a written objection.
( d ) The parties are encouraged to stipulate as to the admissibility of exhibits.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 28, 2005.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-28414 Filed 12-22-04; 3:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
### §2286f. Judicial review

Chapter 7 of title 5 shall apply to the activities of the Board under this subchapter.

(Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, title I, §317, as added Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title XIV, §1441(a)(1), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2083; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 102–486, title IX, §902(a)(8), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2944.)
Case 3:08-cv-05593-WHA Document 33 Filed 01/07/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-05593-WHA Document32 Filed01/06/10 Page1 of 2
Case3:08-cv-05593-WHA Document32 Filed01/06/10 Page2 of 2

THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE. January 7, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-05593-WHA Document 33 Filed 01/07/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 1 - Case No. 03:08-CV-01779-JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

DILLINGHAM & MURPHY LLP 

Dennis J. Kelly (SBN 191414) 

Hsiao C. (Mark) Mao (SBN 236165) 

225 Bush Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94104-4207 

Telephone: (415) 397-2700 

Facsimile: (415) 397-3300 

djk@dillinghammurphy.com

mcm@dillinghammurphy.com

HODGSON RUSS LLP 

Kevin D. Szczepanski, Pro Hac Vice

The Guaranty Building 

140 Pearl Street, Suite 100 

Buffalo, New York 14202-4040 

Telephone: (716) 848-1485 

Facsimile: (716) 819-4764 

kds@hodgsonruss.com

Attorneys for Third-Party Plaintiff 

ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JON W. BAYLESS and GARY J. 

MORGENTHALER, as Trustees in 

Dissolution for WESTWAVE 

COMMUNICATIONS, INC. a dissolved 

Delaware corporation, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE 

COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 03:08-CV-01779-JSW

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Third-Party Plaintiff, 

vs. 

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Third-Party Defendant. 

Case3:08-cv-01779-JSW Document81-1 Filed06/07/10 Page1 of 2 Case 3:08-cv-01779-JSW Document 84 Filed 06/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Page 2 - Case No. 03:08-CV-01779-JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

ORDER

The Request for a Postponement of the June 22 Mediation Completion Deadline filed by 

Third-Party Plaintiff ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE COMPANY is hereby granted. 

The Mediation Completion Deadline is hereby postponed to _____________________. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED 

Dated: June ___, 2010 JUDGE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT 

 COURT OF CALIFORNIA

 

Hon. Jeffrey S. White 

Case3:08-cv-01779-JSW Document81-1 Filed06/07/10 Page2 of 2

September 14, 2010

 This Order does not alter any other deadlines set by the Court.

8

Case 3:08-cv-01779-JSW Document 84 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FAITH TURNAGE,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

HAYWARD ISLANDER MOTEL,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))

No. C08-5618 BZ

CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties to this matter having advised the Court that

they have agreed to a settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and all scheduled

matters are VACATED; provided, however, that any party may,

within 30 days of the date of this Order, move the Court to

restore this matter to the calendar on the grounds that the

settlement has not been consummated.

Dated: March 26, 2010

   Bernard Zimmerman

United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\MISC\TURNAGE CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-05618-BZ   Document 14   Filed 03/26/10   Page 1 of 1
```

[111th Congress Public Law 277]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2900]]

Public Law 111-277
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  100 Orndorf Drive in Brighton, Michigan, as the ``Joyce Rogers Post 
       Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2010 -  [H.R. 5341]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOYCE ROGERS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Orndorf Drive in Brighton, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Joyce Rogers Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joyce 
Rogers Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 13, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5341:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            July 20, 22, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Review of Heart Study Applications.                    

*Date:*                         January 6, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone conference call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Valerie L. Prenger, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator, Review Branch, Room 7194, Division of Extramural Affairs, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0288.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: December 20, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-28310  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 3:09-CV-00192-JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CONTINUING 1

HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS

WILLIAM A. WINEBERG (SBN 54827) 

BILL@WINEBERGLAW.COM

SUZANNE KLOTZ (SBN 104593) 

S_KLOTZ@COMCAST.NET

150 POST STREET, SUITE 742 

SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108 

TELEPHONE: (415) 434-1200 

FACSIMILE: (415) 296-8552 

BRYCE L. LETTERMAN (SBN 152801) 

BRYCE@LETTERMANLAW.COM

4425 JAMBOREE ROAD #115 

NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 

TELEPHONE: (949) 261-9500 

FACSIMILE: (949) 612-3802 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS, 

MALCOLM COOMBS, JUDITH COOMBS JONES AND 

BARTON COOMBS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MALCOLM COOMBS, JUDITH COOMBS JONES, 

and BARTON COOMBS, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

RICHARD M. MUNOZ, as executor of the will of 

Rogan Mal Coombs, deceased, and RICHARD M. 

MUNOZ, as an individual, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 3:09-CV-00192-JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 

PENDING MOTIONS 

Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

 

 

 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulated Request for Order Continuing Hearing on Pending 

Motions and for good cause, it is hereby ordered that the hearing on the defendants’ Motion to 

Enforce Settlement Agreement; or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ 

Claims; or, in the Alternative, a Motion to Stay the Proceedings and Motion to Dismiss First 

Amended Complaint for Failure to Join a Necessary Party and Lack of Subject Matter 

Case3:09-cv-00192-JSW Document57-1 Filed12/29/09 Page1 of 2 Case 3:09-cv-00192-JSW Document 59 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case No. 3:09-CV-00192-JSW 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CONTINUING 

HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS 

2

Jurisdiction, currently scheduled for January 15, 2010 at 9:00 a.m., shall be continued to February 

5, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January ___, 2010 By: _______________________________ 

 Honorable Jeffrey S. White 

 United States District Court Judge 

 

Case3:09-cv-00192-JSW Document57-1 Filed12/29/09 Page2 of 2

If the parties receive a ruling from the state court prior to that date, 

they shall file it with the Court forthwith. 4

Case 3:09-cv-00192-JSW Document 59 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 2