alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
P. Pinkas, Chief Executive Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert P. PinkasRobert P. Pinkas
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brantley
Capital Corporation and will be retained by Brantley Capital Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 96.68 Scope.

The provisions in this subpart establish the procedures that the accrediting entity will use for processing complaints against accredited agencies and approved persons (including complaints concerning their use of supervised providers) that raise an issue of compliance with the Convention, the IAA, the UAA, or the regulations implementing the IAA or UAA, as determined by the accrediting entity or the Secretary, and that are therefore relevant to the oversight functions of the accrediting entity or the Secretary.

[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40636, July 14, 2014]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe 737 graphite composite flight spoiler flight service evaluationThe flight service experience of 111 graphite-epoxy spoilers on 737 transport aircraft and related ground based environmental exposure of graphite-epoxy material specimens is covered. Spoilers have been installed on 28 aircraft representing seven major airlines operating throughout the world. An extended flight service evaluation program of 15 years is presently underway. As of December 1984, a total of 2,092, 155 spoiler flight hours and 2,954,814 spoiler landings had been accumulated by this fleet.Document ID19860008978Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCoggeshall, R. L.*(Boeing Commercial Airplane Co. Seattle, WA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1985Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-172600NAS 1.26:172600D6-53021REPT-8Accession Number86N18448Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-33CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-11668Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860008978.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Research 
Program Projects (PO1).
    Date: January 5, 2005.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Guo HE Zhang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-451-6524, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b71636a656c6c7e4b666a626725656263256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9839198979e9e8cb994989095d7979091d79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: December 15, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27961 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1508.115 How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in covered transactions? With the exceptions stated in §§ 1508.120, 1508.315, and 1508.420, a person who is excluded by the African Development Foundation or any other Federal agency may not: ( a ) Be a participant in a(n) ADF transaction that is a covered transaction under subpart B of this part;
( b ) Be a participant in a transaction of any other Federal agency that is a covered transaction under that agency's regulation for debarment and suspension; or
( c ) Act as a principal of a person participating in one of those covered transactions.
#### § 238.3 The Guarantee.

Subject to the terms and conditions set out in this part, the United States of America, acting through USAID, guarantees to Noteholders the Borrower's repayment of 100 percent of principal and interest due on each series of Eligible Notes. Under the Guarantee, USAID agrees to pay to any Noteholder compensation in Dollars equal to such Noteholder's Loss of Investment under its Eligible Note; provided, however, that no such payment shall be made to any Noteholder for any such loss arising out of fraud or misrepresentation for which such Noteholder is responsible or of which it had knowledge at the time it became such Noteholder. The Guarantee shall apply to each Eligible Note registered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

AMENDED ORDER RE

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS

TO FILE UNDER SEAL

A February 10 order (Dkt. No. 370) granted plaintiffs’ administrative motions to unseal

portions of their submissions in support of their motion to amend the case schedule (Dkt. No.

299), motion to compel production (Dkt. No. 354) and reply in support of motion to compel (Dkt.

No. 365). Information in these submissions had been designated as “confidential” by defendants. 

At the hearing on February 11, defendants stated while they did not object to unsealing most of

these documents, they did object to unsealing exhibit I to the declaration to Steve W. Berman in

support of plaintiffs’ motion to amend the case schedule, on the grounds that it contains

confidential employee information. For good cause shown, the February 10 order is hereby

AMENDED. Exhibit I to the declaration of Steve W. Berman (Dkt. No. 296) shall be sealed. The 

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 403 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

other documents unsealed by the February 10 order shall be made part of the public record and

plaintiffs shall file those documents without redactions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 12, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01510-WHA Document 403 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 2
Memo to: Docket EPA- HQ- OAR - 2008 - 0218

Subject: 6 - 25 - 14 meeting with Ute Mountain Ute Tribe to discuss preparations for the July 10, 2014 consultation between EPA and the Tribe on EPA’s current proposed regulation at 40 CFR 61 From: Reid J Rosnick, Radiation Protection Division Members of EPA : Reid Rosnick, Tom Peake , Pat Childers, Jed Harrison, Angelique Diaz, Scott Patefield, Scott Jackson , Art Palomares Ute Mt. Ute Tribe representatives: Scott Clow, Celine Hawkins, Colin Larrick, Mike Keller, Tom oe Natori Scott Clow noted that the consultation is scheduled for July 10, 2014 beginning at approximately 9 am, MDT. He will arrange for a conference call - in line. EPA noted that members of Region 8 will attend while members of ORIA will call in. The consultation will be about the proposed Subpart W rulemaking , but may dovetail into other areas the Tribe has discussed . For instance, i f any time remains, we could discuss the off- site or alternate fee d issues. It was noted that Region 8, the Tribe and th e state of Utah will be holding a meeting in a month or so to discuss issuers related to enforcement and the off- site rule. EPA, Scott and Celine discussed the questions/answers to be discussed during the consultation: The meeting was then adjourned.
#### § 216.5 Endangered species.

It is A.I.D. policy to conduct its assistance programs in a manner that is sensitive to the protection of endangered or threatened species and their critical habitats. The Initial Environmental Examination for each project, program or activity having an effect on the environment shall specifically determine whether the project, program or activity will have an effect on an endangered or threatened species, or critical habitat. If the proposed project, program or activity will have the effect of jeopardizing an endangered or threatened species or of adversely modifying its critical habitat, the Threshold Decision shall be a Positive Determination and an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement completed as appropriate, which shall discuss alternatives or modifications to avoid or mitigate such impact on the species or its habitat.

[45 FR 70247, Oct. 23, 1980]
#### William H. Anagnos et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Gary M. Hangac et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[715 NYS2d 439]

—In an action, *inter alia,*for a declaration that the plaintiffs are entitled to an easement across the defendants’ property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated September 13, 1999, as declared that they did not have a general right of ingress and egress across the defendants’ property, and the defendants cross-appeal from so much of the same judgment as, upon an order of the same court dated July 7, 1999, granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for summary judgment on their first cause of action, declared that the plaintiffs have a right to a “farm crossing.”

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiffs is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as reviewed, by deleting the provision thereof declaring that the plaintiffs have a right to a farm crossing and substituting therefor a provision declaring that the plaintiffs do not have a right to a farm crossing; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

By order dated July 7, 1999, the Supreme Court, *inter alia,*determined that the plaintiffs do not have a general right of ingress and egress across the defendants’ property. The plaintiffs’ appeal from that order was dismissed for failure to timely perfect. The dismissal of that appeal precludes review of the issues raised by the plaintiffs on their appeal from the judgment *(see, Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350).

The Supreme Court erred in its determination that the plaintiffs had the right to a farm crossing *(see,*Railroad Law § 52) across the defendants’, property. The option to demand construction of a farm crossing was never exercised *(see,*Railroad Law § 52). In addition, the plaintiffs’ deed to the dominant parcel does not mention a right to a farm crossing, and the property, which was not landlocked, was never developed for agricultural or industrial purposes *(see,*Railroad Law § 52; *Walker v State of New York,*33 NY2d 450; *Syracuse Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v State of New York,*43 AD2d 800). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
### §7195. Report to Congress; contents

Within one year after October 1, 1977, the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress concerning the actions taken to implement section 7191 of this title. The report shall include a discussion of the adequacy of such section from the standpoint of the Department and the public, including a summary of any comments obtained by the Secretary from the public about such section and implementing regulations, and such recommendations as the Secretary deems appropriate concerning the procedures required by such section.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title V, §505, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 591.)
### §300l. Requirement of matching funds

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may not make a grant under section 300k of this title unless the State involved agrees, with respect to the costs to be incurred by the State in carrying out the purpose described in such section, to make available non-Federal contributions (in cash or in kind under subsection (b)) toward such costs in an amount equal to not less than $1 for each $3 of Federal funds provided in the grant. Such contributions may be made directly or through donations from public or private entities.

#### (b) Determination of amount of non-Federal contribution

#### (1) In general

Non-Federal contributions required in subsection (a) may be in cash or in kind, fairly evaluated, including equipment or services (and excluding indirect or overhead costs). Amounts provided by the Federal Government, or services assisted or subsidized to any significant extent by the Federal Government, may not be included in determining the amount of such non-Federal contributions.

#### (2) Maintenance of effort

In making a determination of the amount of non-Federal contributions for purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary may include only non-Federal contributions in excess of the average amount of non-Federal contributions made by the State involved toward the purpose described in section 300k of this title for the 2-year period preceding the first fiscal year for which the State is applying to receive a grant under such section.

#### (3) Inclusion of relevant non-Federal contributions for medicaid

In making a determination of the amount of non-Federal contributions for purposes of subsection (a), the Secretary shall, subject to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, include any non-Federal amounts expended pursuant to title XIX of the Social Security Act [42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.] by the State involved toward the purpose described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 300k(a) of this title.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XV, §1502, as added Pub. L. 101–354, §2, Aug. 10, 1990, 104 Stat. 410.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(3), is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Title XIX of the Social Security Act is classified generally to subchapter XIX (§1396 et seq.) of chapter 7 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 300l, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XV, §1511, as added Jan. 4, 1975, Pub. L. 93–641, §3, 88 Stat. 2229; amended Apr. 22, 1976, Pub. L. 94–278, title XI, §1106(a), 90 Stat. 416; Aug. 1, 1977, Pub. L. 95–83, title I, §106(b), 91 Stat. 384; Oct. 4, 1979, Pub. L. 96–79, title I, §104(a)(1), (b), 93 Stat. 595, 596, related to establishment of health service areas, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–660, title VII, §701(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3799, effective Jan. 1, 1987.

A prior section 1502 of act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XV, was classified to section 300k–2 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–660.
Anthony Costa Senior Manager/Chief Inspector

May 28, 2014

Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor , Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.

Reference Docket ID: FAA-2014-0028

On January 14, 2014, Gulfstream pet itioned for an exemption to 14 CFR 145.107(a)(1) of the Federal Regulations. In pursuit of other avenues of compliance, Gulfstream wished to withdr aw this petition for exemption.

Anthony Costa Sr. Quality Manager Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Tel: (912) 965 5854
"Rausch, L. (Louette)" <Louette.Rausch2@akzonobel .com> 02/01/2012 09:15 AM To EHPV-Program-Submissions@EPA

cc "christina

_ franz@americanchemistry.com" <christina

_ franz@americanchemistry.com>, "Rausch, L. (Louette)" <Louette.Rausch2@akzonobel.com> bcc Subject NTAN EHPV Submission-Revised III

Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals LLC has sponsored acetonitrile, 2,2’2”- nitrilotris- (CAS# 7327-60-8), also known as NTAN, in the U.S. EHPV program. The revised NTAN EHPV Submission, which includes the revised test plan and revised robust summaries, in IUCLID5 format, are attached.

The IUCLID5 has been revised from that submitted on 08-10-2011 to correct information on the identity of the test article in one of the endpoint summaries.
In the previous version of the test plan (February 2009) it was proposed to perform vapor p ressure (OECD 104), water solubility (OECD 105), combined repeat dose/reproductive/developmental (OECD 422) and genetic toxicity studies on NTAN. These studies are now finalized.
Additional studies were performed to comply with the REACH (Registration Evaluation Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals) legislation as follows.
Physical/chemical characteristics; density (OECD 109), p article size distribution ( N EN-ISO 13320-1) and auto flammability (EU method A.16).
Environmental: Biodegradation in water (OECD 301D), short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates (OECD 202) and toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria (OECD 201).
All data mentioned above, in addition to existing data on phys-chem, acute toxicity and irritation obtained during data gathering under REACH has been summarized in IUCLID5 and included in the test plan.The original REACH disseminated NTAN dossier is publically available and can be located on the ECHA website at:
http :// apps . echa

. europa . eu / registered / registered

- sub

. aspx
Please contact me if you have any questions.

Best regards, Louette J. Rausch, M.S. Expertise Leader Regulatory Affairs Americas HSE Department T +1-312-544-7061 F +1-312-544-7125 M +1-630-881-7749 E louette

. rausch @ akzonobel

. com Akzo Nobel Services Inc. 525 W. Van Buren St. Chicago, Il 60607-3835 United States www . akzonobel

. com Follow AkzoNobel online at www . akzonobel

. com / followus

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained in this message, including any attachments, may be privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual and/or entity identified in theaddress of this message. If you are not an intended recipient, p lease notify the sender and delete and destroy this message, including any back-up copies. Please refer to www . akzonobel

. com / legal

- entities for further legal information regarding the sending entity if from the EU, Croatia, N orway, Turkey, Ukraine or Switzerland.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - NTAN Revised Test Plan 08-10-2011.pdf - NTAN-EPA IUCLID5 Feb 1 2012.pdf
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carol Russell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  May 21, 2004                                /s/Carol Russell
                                                      ----------------
                                                      Carol Russell
                                                      Treasurer