alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2605

To suspend temporarily the duty on Formulations of Difenoconazole/

Mefenoxam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Formulations of 

Difenoconazole/Mefenoxam.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF DIFENOCONAZOLE/

4 MEFENOXAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading:
2

•HR 2605 IH 

‘‘ 9902.90.10 Formulations of 

Difenoconazole and 

Mefenoxam which contain 

Difenoconazole Technical 

1H-1,2,4-triazole, 1-[[2-[2-

chloro-4-(4-

chlorophenoxy)phenyl]-4-

methyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-

yl]methyl]- and Mefenoxam 

Technical (R,S)–2-[(2,6-

dimethylphenyl]-

methoxyacetylamino]-propionic acid methyl ester (CAS 

Nos. 70630–17–0, 69516–

34–3, and 119446–68–3) 

(provided for in subheading 

3808.20.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 1000.227 What shall HUD do upon receipt of an IHP submission deadline waiver request?

The waiver shall be decided upon by HUD within 45 days of receipt of the waiver request. HUD shall notify the recipient in writing within 45 days of receipt of the waiver request whether the request is approved or denied.

[77 FR 71526, Dec. 3, 2012]
#### § 512.7 Return of property.

Nothing contained in this regulation is intended to deter Broadcasting Board of Governors from demanding the return of specific property or from demanding the return of the property or the payment of its value.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mary McNamara, SBN 147131

SWANSON & McNAMARA LLP

300 Montgomery Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 477-3800

Facsimile: (415) 477-9010

Attorney for DONOVAN HENRY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DONOVAN HENRY,

Defendant.

Case No. CR 09-1142 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF

RELEASE TO PERMIT TRAVEL TO THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Defendant Donovan Henry, by and through his counsel, Mary McNamara, and the United

States, by and through Assistant United States Attorney Barbara Brennan Silano, hereby

stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On January 19, 2010, the Court set conditions of release for defendant Donovan

Henry, one of which was a condition that he not travel outside the Northern

District of California, except for travel to the Eastern District of California to visit

his son in Citrus Heights. 

2. The parties agree to a modification of Mr. Henry’s conditions of release to permit

him to travel to the Eastern District generally. The purpose of this modification is

to allow Mr. Henry to visit his family members who reside in the Eastern District. 

Mr. Henry’s sister, Debbie Senter, resides in Quincy, California. Mr. Henry’s

Case 3:09-cr-01142-CRB Document 31 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

brother, David Henry, resides in Roseville, California. Mr. Henry’s family is

planning multiple family events in the Eastern District, including a Fourth of July

celebration and a birthday party for Mr. Henry’s 88 year-old mother. 

3. Pretrial Services Officer Kenneth J. Gibson has no objection to the proposed

modification on the condition that Mr. Henry provide him with his travel

information before each instance of travel.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: May 5, 2010

________/s/___________________

MARY McNAMARA

Attorney for DONALD DANIELS

Dated: May 5, 2010 ________/s/___________________

BARBARA BRENNAN SILANO

Assistant United States Attorney

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ____________________________

HON. Elizabeth D. Laporte

United States Magistrate Judge

May 11, 2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

Case 3:09-cr-01142-CRB Document 31 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 92.22 “Affidavit” defined.

An affidavit is a written declaration under oath made before some person who has authority to administer oaths, without notice to any adverse party that may exist. One test of the sufficiency of an affidavit is whether it is so clear and certain that it will sustain an indictment for perjury, if found to be false. An affidavit differs from a deposition in that it is taken ex parte and without notice, while a deposition is taken after notice has been furnished to the opposite party, who is given an opportunity to cross-examine the witness.
**\TED S'4) 

nQL 

mm UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

% <,ae REGION IX 

'''*4< pQoreG 75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 941 05-3901 

JUL 2 0 2012 

Mr. Henry Darwin 

Director 

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 

1 1 10 West Washington Street 

&$hay 25,'2012, you submitted a package of materials containing a revision to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan for achieving and maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for 

Particulate Matter less than 10 microns (PM-10). This revision includes the 20 12 Five Percent Plan for 

PM- 10 for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area and the 201 2 Five Percent Plan for PM- 10 for the Pinal 

County Township 1 North, Range 8 East Nonattainment Area. This package was supplemented with 

additional information transmitted by letter on June 22,2012 and July 2,2012. We understand that this 

revision is intended by ADEQ to address the requirements of section 189(d) of the Clean Air Act for the 

Phoenix Planning Area. 

We have reviewed this package for completeness and found that it conforms to the completeness criteria 

in 40 CFR part 5 1, appendix V. Therefore, this submittal addresses the finding of failure to submit for 

the Phoenix Planning area made by EPA on February 14,201 1 (76 FR 8300). The finding of 

completeness conveyed in this letter stops the related clock for mandatory sanctions under section 

179(a) of the Clean Air Act. 

If you have any questions regarding our review, please call me or have your staff contact Colleen 

McKaughan, Associate Director, at (520) 498-01 18, mckaughan.colleen~,eua.nov. 

Sincerely, 

Director, Air Division 

cc: Dennis Smith, Executive Director 

Maricopa Association of Governments
§ 213.33 Permitted actions after termination of collection activity. Termination of collection activity ceases active collection of the debt. Termination does not preclude the agency from retaining a record of the account for purposes of: ( a ) Selling the debt if the CFO determines that such sale is in the best interests of USAID;
( b ) Pursuing collection at a subsequent date in the event there is a change in the debtor's status or a new collection tool becomes available;
( c ) Offsetting against future income or assets not available at the time of termination of collection activity; or
( d ) Screening future applicants for prior indebtedness.
### §6914. Grants for discarded tire disposal

#### (a) Grants

The Administrator shall make available grants equal to 5 percent of the purchase price of tire shredders (including portable shredders attached to tire collection trucks) to those eligible applicants best meeting criteria promulgated under this section. An eligible applicant may be any private purchaser, public body, or public-private joint venture. Criteria for receiving grants shall be promulgated under this section and shall include the policy to offer any private purchaser the first option to receive a grant, the policy to develop widespread geographic distribution of tire shredding facilities, the need for such facilities within a geographic area, and the projected risk and viability of any such venture. In the case of an application under this section from a public body, the Administrator shall first make a determination that there are no private purchasers interested in making an application before approving a grant to a public body.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated $750,000 for each of the fiscal years 1978 and 1979 to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §2004, as added Pub. L. 94–580, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2805.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Administrator or other official of Environmental Protection Agency under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 6903 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

CR 09-01029 MMC

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

CYNTHIA M. FREY (CABN 150571)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: cynthia.frey@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGIO PEREZ-PEREZ,

a/k/a LUIS GONZALEZ,

a/k/a JESUS MORENO,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-01029 MMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

Current Hearing Date: February 17, 2010 

Time: 2:30 p.m.

Proposed Hearing Date: March 3, 2010

Time 2:30 p.m.

The above-captioned case is currently scheduled for sentencing on February 17, 2010 at

2:30 p.m. Due to delays associated with the Modified Presentence Report and objections raised

by both parties in relation to the facts contained therein, the parties request a continuance of the

scheduled hearing for sentencing to March 3, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. Counsel for the defendant and

the Probation Officer have agreed to the proposed continuance.

This request is made pursuant to Criminal Local Rule 32-2. As of this date, the amended

Modified Presentence Report has not yet been filed and, good cause exists for the continuance of

the sentencing hearing. Crim. L.R. 32-2(a) - (a)(1). Moreover, counsel for both parties and the

Case 3:09-cr-01029-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

CR 09-01029 MMC

probation officer have conferred and confirmed their availability on March 3, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. 

Additionally, the Courtroom Deputy Clerk confirmed the Court’s availability for March 3, 2010. 

Crim. L. R. 32-2(a)(2)-(3). A proposed order is attached hereto. Crim. L.R. 32-2(a)(4).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 /s/

DATED: February 16, 2010 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

Northern District of California

CYNTHIA M. FREY

Assistant United States Attorney

 /s/

DATED: February 16, 2010

JODI LINKER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for Sergio Perez-Perez

Case 3:09-cr-01029-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

CR 09-01029 MMC

For good cause shown and in accordance with Criminal Local Rule 32-2(a), the hearing

for sentencing on these matters, now scheduled for February 17, 2010 at 2:30 p.m., is vacated. 

The hearing shall be continued to March 3, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. for sentencing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Court Judge

February 16, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-01029-MMC Document 12 Filed 02/16/10 Page 3 of 3
### §6891. Exchange of energy information among the States

The Secretary of Energy shall (through conferences, publications, and other appropriate means) encourage and facilitate the exchange of information among the States with respect to energy conservation and increased use of nondepletable energy sources.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title IV, §461, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1168; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), title VII, §703, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577, 606.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Administrator", meaning Administrator of Federal Energy Administration, pursuant to sections 301(a), 703, and 707 of Pub. L. 95–91, which are classified to sections 7151(a), 7293, and 7297 of this title and which terminated Federal Energy Administration and transferred its functions and functions of Administrator thereof (with certain exceptions) to Secretary of Energy.
This material may be protected by copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code).
{00136699.DOC} 1 No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC 

Stipulation to Continue Hearing on R.R. Street & Co. Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss City of Eureka’s Cross-Claim 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HICKS

THOMAS LLP

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 388-0833 

Eric Grant (Bar No. 151064) 

grant@hicks-thomas.com 

Hicks Thomas LLP 

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 388-0833 

Facsimile: (916) 691-3261 

Paula Whitten (Bar No. 255811) 

pwhitten@hicks-thomas.com 

Hicks Thomas LLP 

700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2000 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 547-9100 

Facsimile: (713) 547-9150 

Counsel for Defendant 

R.R. STREET & CO. INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California 

corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF EUREKA, et al., 

 Defendants, 

AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS

AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED 

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING 

ON DEFENDANT R.R. STREET & 

CO. INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

CITY OF EUREKA’S THIRD AMENDED 

COUNTER-CLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM 

[Civil L.R. 7-12] 

 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, Defendant, Cross-Claimant, and Counter-Claimant City of 

Eureka (“Eureka”) and Defendant and Cross-Defendant R.R. Street & Co. Inc. (“Street”) hereby 

stipulate and request judicial action as follows: 

1. Eureka has filed its Third Amended Counter-Claim and Cross-Claim (Doc. 228, 

filed Apr. 30, 2010), and Street has filed a motion to dismiss that pleading (Doc. 256, filed June 4, 

2010). The hearing on that motion is currently set for July 9, 2010. 

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 264 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 2
{00136699.DOC} 2 No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC 

Stipulation to Continue Hearing on R.R. Street & Co. Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss City of Eureka’s Cross-Claim 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HICKS

THOMAS LLP

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 388-0833 

2. Eureka has requested additional time to respond to Street’s motion to dismiss, and 

Street is amenable to that request. 

3. Accordingly, the hearing on Street’s motion is continued to Friday, July 23, 2010 

at 9:00 a.m. 

 Dated: June 11, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Eric Grant 

Eric Grant 

Paula Whitten 

Hicks Thomas LLP 

Counsel for Defendant and Cross-Defendant 

R.R. STREET & CO. INC. 

(The filer hereby attests that concurrence in

the filing of this document has been obtained 

from the signatory below.) 

DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP 

/s/ Charles Bolcom 

MORIS DAVIDOVITZ 

CHARLES BOLCOM 

STACEY ALTON 

Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Claimant, 

and Counter-Claimant CITY OF EUREKA 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June _____, 2010. 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

United States District Judge 

15

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 264 Filed 06/15/10 Page 2 of 2
#### City of Chicago, appellee, v. M. H. Callner, appellant.

Gen. No. 28,679.

Suit against Oity of Chicago. Judgment for city. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. W. E. Helander, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district.

Affirmed for failure of appellant to file record.

See City v. Salmitsky, 210 Ill. App. 159.

Opinion filed June 25, 1923.

No appearance for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Advanced Optics  Electronics,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the three  months  ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Leslie Robins,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                               /S/ Leslie Robins
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               May 17, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
P. 1



# OAR Box 1818 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 22 ) ll-C-1 9 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/6/2008 3:12:44

PM Sheet 22 of 79P. 2



### J U L 

### I 

### i J'i "

Honorabl e Edwar d P . Boland , Chairma n Hous e Appropriation s Subcommitte e on HUD-Independen t Agencie s 242 6 Raybur n Offic e Building Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Boland : I n the Conferenc e Committe e Repor t for the 196 7 fisca l yea r budget , th

e conferee s requeste d tha t the U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) provid e Congres s wit h certai n backgroun

d informatio n regarding the regulatio n o f refueling emission s .fro

mmoto r vehicles , a s detaile d i n the Hous e Appropriation s Committe e Report . Th e Hous e Appropriation s Committe e expresse d concer n tha t th e Agenc yma

yno t hav e develope d sufficien t dat a wit h whic h t o properl yasses s the desirabilit yo f a nationwid e refueling contro l program . A s a consequence , EPAwa s directe d to : 1 ) revie wthe nee d fo r an d effectivenes s o f a nationwid e refueling contro l program , 2 ) evaluat e the cost s an d benefit s o f alternative s t o assur e a cost-effectiv e strategy , 3 ) assur e tha t requirement s o f th e Federa l Moto r Vehicl e Safet yStandard 30 1 or potentia l defec t problem s relate d t o onboard control s ar e adequatel yresolved , an d 4 ) addres s the effect s o f fue l volatilit yon refueling controls . I n addition , the Hous e Appropriation s Committe e aske d tha t informatio n regardin g th e abov e issue s an d al l o f th e rulemaking suppor t material s b e provide d t o Congres s concurrentl ywit h EPA' s submissio n o f the proposa l fo r Federa l Registe r publication . I a mplease d t o provid e ou r proposa l t o contro l refueling emission s an

d the regulator

ysuppor t material s t o Congress , a s requeste d (se e enclosures ) . I woul d lik e t o assur e the member s o f Congres s tha t the propose d actio n i s th e culminatio n o f a n intensive analysi s t o identif yth e mos t appropriat e for mforP. 3

<f *" • controllin g refuelin g emissions , and tha t al l th e concern s •expresse d b

yth e Appropriation s Committe e hav e bee n carefull y considered . A s always , w e wil l b e carefull yconsiderin g al l comment s receive d i n th e upcomin g publi c commen t perio d and publi c hearin g befor e proceedin g wit hfurthe r regulator yactio n i n thi s area . Sincerely , (Origina l signe

d b yL.M . Thomas ) Le e M . Thoma s Enclosure s
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,059
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,096
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,499
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             737
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               739
<LOANS>                                         46,834
<ALLOWANCE>                                        781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,252
<DEPOSITS>                                      55,365
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                162
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  65,252
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    933
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  178
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    36
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,147
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 520
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 520
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              627
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    243
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         243
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       151
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.84
<LOANS-NON>                                         88
<LOANS-PAST>                                         9
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    80
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   781
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  781
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                96
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            685


</TABLE>