alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 115.201 The two phases of substantial equivalency certification. Substantial equivalency certification is granted if the Department determines that a state or local agency enforces a law that is substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act with regard to substantive rights, procedures, remedies, and the availability of judicial review. The Department has developed a two-phase process of substantial equivalency certification. ( a ) *Adequacy of Law.* In the first phase, the Assistant Secretary will determine whether, on its face, the fair housing law that the agency administers provides rights, procedures, remedies, and the availability of judicial review that are substantially equivalent to those provided in the federal Fair Housing Act. An affirmative conclusion may result in the Department offering the agency interim certification. An agency must obtain interim certification prior to obtaining certification.
( b ) *Adequacy of Performance.* In the second phase, the Assistant Secretary will determine whether, in operation, the fair housing law that the agency administers provides rights, procedures, remedies, and the availability of judicial review that are substantially equivalent to those provided in the federal Fair Housing Act. An affirmative conclusion will result in the Department offering the agency certification.
### §1548. Rules and regulations; standards of safety, convenience, and health

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of subchapters II to VII of this chapter, and shall establish reasonable standards of safety, convenience, and health.

(Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 862, title III, §308, formerly §11, 54 Stat. 1128; renumbered title III, §308, June 28, 1941, ch. 260, §4(b), 55 Stat. 363; amended Ex. Ord. No. 9070, §1, eff. Feb. 24, 1942, 7 F.R. 1529; Apr. 20, 1950, ch. 94, title II, §204, 64 Stat. 73; Pub. L. 89–174, §5(a), Sept. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 669.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subchapters III and VI of this chapter, referred to in text, were comprised of sections 1531 to 1536 and 1571 to 1576, respectively, of this title and have been omitted from the Code. For further details, see note set out under section 1522 of this title.

#### Amendments

1950—Act Apr. 20, 1950, substituted "Housing and Home Finance Administrator" and "Housing and Home Finance Agency" for "National Housing Administrator" and "National Housing Agency", respectively, wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions to Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, see note set out under section 1522 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Federal Works Administrator relating to defense housing consolidated with other agencies into National Housing Agency during World War II by Ex. Ord. No. 9070.
#### Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, complainant, v. Eva Heyman and Edith Wise, defendants. Appeal of Edith Wise, appellant, v. Eva Heyman, appellee.

Gen. No. 27,908.

Suit on benefit certificate between two claimants. Interpleader by fraternal order. Judgment for claimant Eva Heyman. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Ira Ryner, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

Rehearing denied June 11, 1923.

Slottow & Levitón, for appellant; Charles Levitón, of counsel. L. W. Reinecker, Jr. and Edgar A. Jonas, for appellee; J. J. Cooke, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Announcement of FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 145-RSTP (Draft), 
Repair Station Training Program

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability of AC, and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of and requests 
comments on AC 145-RSTP that provides guidance on eligibility, 
application, and selection for the repair station training program.

DATES: Submit comments on or before January 21, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments on AC 145-RSTP to Mr. Herbert E. Daniel, 
Aircraft Maintenance Division, General Aviation and Repair Station 
Branch (AFS-340), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; facsimile (202) 267-5115; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b230e19090e191f452e452f0a05020e072b0d0a0a450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="79311c0b1b1c0b0d573c573d1817101c15391f1818571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Herbert E. Daniel, AFS-340, at the 
address, facsimile, or e-mail listed above, or by telephone at (202) 
267-3109; or Mr. Dan Bachelder, AFS-340, at the address or facsimile 
listed above or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8dc9ece3a3cfeceee5e8e1e9e8ffcdebececa3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c783a6a9e985a6a4afa2aba3a2b587a1a6a6e9a0a8b1">[email protected]</span></a> or by telephone at (202) 
267-7027.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The proposed AC 145-RSTP is available on the FAA's Regulatory 
Guidance Library Web site at: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgDAC.nsf/MainFrame?OpenFrameSet under the Open 
for Comment link. Interested persons are invited to comment on the AC 
by submitting written data, views, or suggestions, as they may desire. 
Please identify AC 145-RSTP, Repair Station Training Program, and 
submit comments, either hardcopy or electronic, to the appropriate 
address listed above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 17, 2004.
James J. Ballough,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 04-28008 Filed 12-17-04; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 14.105 Purpose of these rules.

The Act provides for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and entities who are parties to certain administrative proceedings (*adversary adjudications*) before the Department. An eligible party may receive an award when it prevails over an agency, unless the agency's position was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. The rules in this part described the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards and the procedures and standards that the Department will use to make them.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:09:05-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §6914b–1. Regulation of plastic ring carriers

Not later than 24 months after October 28, 1988 (unless the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency determines that it is not feasible or that the byproducts of degradable regulated items present a greater threat to the environment than nondegradable regulated items), the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall require, by regulation, that any regulated item intended for use in the United States shall be made of naturally degradable material which, when discarded, decomposes within a period established by such regulation. The period within which decomposition must occur after being discarded shall be the shortest period of time consistent with the intended use of the item and the physical integrity required for such use. Such regulation shall allow a reasonable time for affected parties to come into compliance, including the use of existing inventories.

(Pub. L. 100–556, title I, §103, Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Solid Waste Disposal Act which comprises this chapter.
Case 3:09-cr-01171-CRB Document 24 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 3Case 3:09-cr-01171-CRB Document 24 Filed 03/11/10 Page 2 of 3Case 3:09-cr-01171-CRB Document 24 Filed 03/11/10 Page 3 of 3
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JUSTIN HENLEY,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

No. CR09-0617 EMC

PRETRIAL ORDER FOR CRIMINAL

BENCH TRIAL

Trial will commence on April 8, 2010 from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom C, 15th

Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file their trial briefs

and shall exchange and provide to the Court one set of pre-marked trial exhibits and witness lists no

later than two weeks before trial (March 25, 2010).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 21, 2010 ______________________________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cr-00617-EMC Document 9 Filed 01/21/10 Page 1 of 1
### §7705c. Acceptance of gifts

#### (a) Authority

In furtherance of the purposes of this chapter, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency may accept and use bequests, gifts, or donations of services, money, or property, notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31.

#### (b) Criteria

The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall establish by regulation criteria for determining whether to accept bequests, gifts, or donations of services, money, or property. Such criteria shall take into consideration whether the acceptance of the bequest, gift, or donation would reflect unfavorably on the Director's 1 ability to carry out his responsibilities in a fair and objective manner, or would compromise the integrity of, or the appearance of the integrity of, the Program or any official involved in administering the Program.

(Pub. L. 95–124, §9, as added Pub. L. 101–614, §9, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3238; amended Pub. L. 115–307, §8(a)(2), Dec. 11, 2018, 132 Stat. 4417.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "section 1342 of title 31" was substituted for "section 3679 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 1342)" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–307 substituted "Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency" for "Director of the Agency" in subsecs. (a) and (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Administrator's".
### §7261b. Technology transfer to small businesses

(1) The Secretary of Energy shall establish a program to facilitate and encourage the transfer of technology to small businesses and shall issue guidelines relating to the program not later than May 1, 1993.

(2) For the purposes of this section, the term "small business" means a business concern that meets the applicable size standards prescribed pursuant to section 632(a) of title 15.

(Pub. L. 102–484, div. C, title XXXI, §3135(b), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2641.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 213.14 Contracting for collection services. USAID has entered into a cross-servicing agreement with the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Fiscal Service is authorized to take all appropriate action to enforce the collection of accounts referred to it in accordance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Fiscal Service bases any applicable fees on the funds collected, and will collect such fees from the debtor along with the original amount of the indebtedness. After referral, Fiscal Service will be solely responsible for the maintenance of the delinquent debtor records in its possession, and for updating the accounts as necessary. Fiscal Service may take any of the following collection actions on USAID's behalf: ( a ) Send demand letters on U. S. Treasury letterhead and telephone debtors;
( b ) Refer accounts to credit bureaus;
( c ) Skiptracing;
( d ) Purchase credit reports to assist in the collection effort;
( e ) Refer accounts for offset, including tax refund, Federal employee salary, administrative wage garnishment, and general administrative offset under the Treasury Offset Program.
( f ) Refer accounts to private collection agencies;
( g ) Refer accounts to DOJ for litigation;
( h ) Report written off/discharged debts to IRS on the appropriate Form 1099;
( i ) Take any additional steps necessary to enforce recovery; and
( j ) Terminate collection action, as appropriate.
[67 FR 47258, July 18, 2002, as amended at 86 FR 31143, June 11, 2021]
### §6371j. Application of sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40

No grant for a project (other than so much of a grant as is used for a preliminary energy audit, energy audit, or technical assistance or a grant the total project cost of which is $5,000 or less, excluding costs for a preliminary energy audit, energy audit, or technical assistance) shall be made under this part or part 1 unless the Secretary finds that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors in the performance of work on any construction utilizing such grants will be paid at rates not less than those prevailing on similar construction in the locality, as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40; and the Secretary of Labor shall have with respect to the labor standards specified in this section the authority and functions set forth in Reorganization Plan Numbered 14 of 1950 (15 F.R. 3176; 5 U.S.C. Appendix) and section 3145 of title 40.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title III, §312, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3254.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, means part 2 (§§310–312) of title III of Pub. L. 95–619, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3248, which enacted sections 6371j and 6372 to 6372i of this title and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 6372 of this title. For complete classification of this part to the Code, see Tables.

Part 1, referred to in text, means part 1 (§§301–304) of title III of Pub. L. 95–619, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3238, which enacted sections 6371 to 6371i of this title, amended sections 300k–2 and 300n–1 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 6371 of this title. For complete classification of this part to the Code, see Tables.

Reorganization Plan Numbered 14 of 1950, referred to in text, is set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Codification

In text, "sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40" substituted for "the Act of March 31, 1931 (40 U.S.C. 276a—276a–5, known as the Davis-Bacon Act)" and "section 3145 of title 40" substituted for "section 2 of the Act of June 13, 1934 (40 U.S.C. 276c)" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.

Section was enacted as a part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act, and not as a part of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act which comprises this chapter, and consequently is not a part of part E of this subchapter.
### §7276e. Provision of rewards

In carrying out a program under this section and section 7276d of this title, each Administrator referred to in section 7276d of this title is authorized to provide rewards (including cash rewards) to individuals who provide information or evidence leading to the arrest and prosecution of individuals causing damage to, or loss of, Federal property under their jurisdiction. The amount of any one such reward paid to any individual may not exceed a value of $1,000.

(Pub. L. 107–78, §2, Nov. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 808.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.
#### § 99.3 [Reserved]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51120

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODOLFO BARNAL-NAVA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1186-ALL

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rodolfo BarnalNava raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior

conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and

not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2490 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 2490

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2005

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 442 West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, as the ``Mayor 
               Joseph S. Daddona Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 442 
West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Mayor Joseph S. Daddona Memorial Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mayor Joseph S. Daddona 
Memorial Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

John L. Burris, Esq. SB#69888 

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

7677 Oakport Street, Ste 1120 

Oakland, CA 94621 

Steven R. Yourke, Esq. 

Law Office of Steven R. Yourke 

7677 Oakport Street, Ste 1120 

Oakland, CA 94621 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Jose Buenrostro, Sr. and Maria Buenrostro 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Jose Buenrostro, Sr. Individually and as 

Successor In Interest to Jose Buenrostro, 

Jr. and Maria Buenrostro, Individually and 

as Successor In Interest to Jose 

Buenrostro, Jr. , 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

City of Oakland, a Municipal Corporation; 

et al. 

 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 3:09-cv-00786 JSW 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

 The parties have reached a tentative settlement agreement in this case. The 

agreement is subject only to the final approval of the Oakland City Council. Accordingly, 

the parties stipulate that this case be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, 

however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety (90) days, with 

proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for 

Case 3:09-cv-00786-JSW Document 54 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-00786-JSW Document53 Filed05/28/10 Page1 of 2
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing shall Order shall stand 

vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. 

Dated: May 27, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

 /s/ John L. Burris 

 John L. Burris 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: May 28, 2010 Rankin Sproat Mires Beaty & Reynolds 

 /s/ Geoffrey A. Beaty 

 Geoffrey A. Beaty 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Case3:09-cv-00786-JSW Document53 Filed05/28/10 Page2 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Jeffrey S. White

June 1, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00786-JSW Document 54 Filed 06/01/10 Page 2 of 2
### §7136. Economic Regulatory Administration; appointment of Administrator; compensation; qualifications; functions

(a) There shall be within the Department an Economic Regulatory Administration to be headed by an Administrator, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who shall be compensated at a rate provided for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5. Such Administrator shall be, by demonstrated ability, background, training, or experience, an individual who is specially qualified to assess fairly the needs and concerns of all interests affected by Federal energy policy. The Secretary shall by rule provide for a separation of regulatory and enforcement functions assigned to, or vested in, the Administration.

(b) Consistent with the provisions of subchapter IV, the Secretary shall utilize the Economic Regulatory Administration to administer such functions as he may consider appropriate.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title II, §206, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 574.)
#### § 2003.2 Definitions.

For purposes of this part:

*Department* means the OIG, except that in the context of §§ 16.1(d); 16.11(b) (1), (3), and (4); and 16.12(e), when those sections are incorporated by reference, the term means the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

*Privacy Act Officer* means an Assistant Inspector General.

*Privacy Appeals Officer* means the Inspector General.

[59 FR 14098, Mar. 25, 1994]