alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.73 Procedure in issuing visas. ( a ) *Evidence of visa.* An immigrant visa shall be evidenced by a physical visa or by an electronic visa located in the Department's records. The appropriate symbol as prescribed in § 42.11, showing the classification of the alien, shall be entered on the visa.
( b ) *Visa format.* A machine-readable visa shall be in the format designated by the Department, and contain, at a minimum, the following data: ( 1 ) Full name of the immigrant;
( 2 ) Visa symbol;
( 3 ) Location of the visa issuing office;
( 4 ) Passport number;
( 5 ) The registration number (A-number) assigned to the immigrant;
( 6 ) Sex;
( 7 ) Date of birth;
( 8 ) Nationality;
( 9 ) Date of issuance;
( 10 ) Date of expiration;
( 11 ) Visa control number;
( 12 ) Any annotations entered to reflect waivers or other information useful to an immigration officer at a port of entry (POE) upon the immigrant's application for admission to the United States;
( 13 ) A digitized photo of the immigrant; and
( 14 ) Machine-readable data that can be processed by an immigration officer at a POE.
( c ) *Disposition of supporting documents.* Post shall, wherever possible, return original supporting documents furnished by the alien. Duplicate copies may be retained in the consular system, as required or necessary.
[84 FR 35299, July 23, 2019]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information
     extracted from (A) and is qualified in its entirety
     by reference to such (B)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001021097
<NAME>                        Dynamic International, Ltd.
<CURRENCY>                    0
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          14628
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1199209
<ALLOWANCES>                                   167000
<INVENTORY>                                   2385644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3651362
<PP&E>                                        1386215
<DEPRECIATION>                                1295097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4196616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3949011
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                         3199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4196616
<SALES>                                       3694425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3705283
<CGS>                                         2487510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2487510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               927088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                170664
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68594
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102070
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102070
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .03
        


</TABLE>
### §5417. Effect upon antitrust laws

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to exempt from the antitrust laws of the United States any conduct that would otherwise be unlawful under such laws, or to prohibit under the antitrust laws of the United States any conduct that would be lawful under such laws. As used in this section, the term "antitrust laws" includes, but is not limited to, the Act of July 2, 1890, as amended; the Act of October 14, 1914, as amended; the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.); and sections 73 and 74 of the Act of August 27, 1894, as amended.

(Pub. L. 93–383, title VI, §618, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 711.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of July 2, 1890, as amended, referred to in text, is act July 2, 1890, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, known as the Sherman Act, which is classified to sections 1 to 7 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1 of Title 15 and Tables.

Act of October 14, 1914, as amended, referred to in text, is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, as amended, known as the Clayton Act which is classified generally to sections 12, 13, 14 to 19, 21, and 22 to 27 of Title 15, and sections 52 and 53 of Title 29, Labor. For further details and complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 12 of Title 15 and Tables.

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in text, is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, as amended, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of Title 15. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of Title 15 and Tables.

Sections 73 and 74 of the Act of August 27, 1894, referred to in text, are classified to sections 8 and 9 of Title 15.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 180 days following Aug. 22, 1974, see section 627 of Pub. L. 93–383, set out as a note under section 5401 of this title.
#### § 203.434 Declaration of trust.

A sale of a beneficial interest in a group of insured mortgages, where the interest to be acquired is related to all of the mortgages as an entirety, rather than an interest in a specific mortgage shall be made only pursuant to a declaration of trust, which has been approved by the Commissioner prior to any such sale.
### §9161. Law of the Sea Treaty

If the United States ratifies a treaty, which includes provisions with respect to jurisdiction over ocean thermal energy conversion activities, resulting from any United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, the Administrator, after consultation with the Secretary of State, shall promulgate any amendment to the regulations promulgated under this chapter which is necessary and appropriate to conform such regulations to the provisions of such treaty, in anticipation of the date when such treaty shall come into force and effect for, or otherwise be applicable to, the United States.

(Pub. L. 96–320, title IV, §401, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 998.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–320, Aug. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 974, known as the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9101 of this title and Tables.
#### Thomas H. Hyatt, Jr., Appellant, v Bonita L. Hyatt, Respondent.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 21, 1976, which, in part, vacated defendant’s default in interposing an answer in her husband’s action for divorce, vacated the judgment entered in that action, permitted defendant to serve an answer therein and directed that such action be placed on the contested calendar for trial, unanimously reversed, to the extent appealed from, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements and without prejudice to any further application defendant may choose to make on proper and adequate papers at Special Term. Defendant, while obviously represented by counsel, entered into a separation agreement on January 17, 1974, which agreement made no provision for her support and which gave custody of the infant children of the parties to plaintiff. She defaulted, by failing to file an answer in her husband’s action for divorce which charged her with cruel and inhuman treatment, leading to the entry of a judgment therein on March 5, 1974. Subsequent to obtaining that divorce, plaintiff remarried and has had a child with his new wife. Defendant has never actually sought to vacate her default. Neither the order to show cause giving rise to the instant proceeding, which was apparently obtained in September, 1975, nor the confusing record compiled by both sides to this dispute thereafter, indicates any clearly expressed desire by defendant to vacate the judgment of divorce. In fact her affidavit in support of the order to show cause states that: "Your deponent * * * does not attack the propriety of the default judgment for divorce had as against her”. And her attorney, at the hearing before the Referee, stated: "Basically the reason I did not specifically request the vacation of the judgment was the fact that Mr. Hyatt immediately or Dr. Hyatt immediately after the decree was handed down remarried. Now that would be asking too much in a sense.” Nowhere in the present record is there any justification for the recommendation by the Referee and the action taken by Special Term to vacate defendant’s default. This does not mean that defendant may not be able to fill in the many gaps appearing in the present record and supply an adequate excuse for her gross laches and neglect — but a strong factual showing will be necessary to justify vacatur at this late date. Something more than inaction or neglect by her attorney must be shown to move the court to exercise its discretion on defendant’s behalf. One of the few conclusions that can be drawn from the present record, which raises more questions than it answers, is that defendant is not now, based thereon, entitled to vacate her default. Concur — Birns, J. P., Silverman, Evans and Capozzoli, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2746 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure that benefits 

under part D of such title have no impact on benefits under other 

Federal programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure 

that benefits under part D of such title have no impact 

on benefits under other Federal programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENEFITS UNDER THE MEDICARE DRUG PRO4 GRAM HAVE NO IMPACT UNDER OTHER FED5 ERAL PROGRAMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–42 of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–152) is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new subsection: 
2 

•HR 2746 IH 

1 ‘‘(c) BENEFITS HAVE NO IMPACT ON BENEFITS

2 UNDER OTHER FEDERAL PROGRAMS.—Benefits under 

3 this part, including the availability of negotiated prices 

4 under this part and premium and cost-sharing subsidies 

5 under section 1860D–14, shall not be treated as benefits 

6 or otherwise taken into account in determining an individ7 ual’s eligibility for, or the amount of benefits under, any 

8 other Federal program.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact11 ment of section 101(a) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 

12 Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 

13 108–173; 117 Stat. 2071). 

Æ
§ 180.445 Settlement negotiations before a settlement judge. ( a ) *Appointment of settlement judge.* The ALJ, upon the motion of a party or upon his or her own motion, may request the Chief Administrative Law Judge to appoint another ALJ to conduct settlement negotiations. The order shall direct the settlement judge to report to the presiding ALJ within specified time periods.
( b ) *Duties of settlement judge.* ( 1 ) The settlement judge shall convene and preside over conferences and settlement negotiations between the parties and assess the practicalities of a potential settlement.
( 2 ) The settlement judge shall report to the presiding ALJ describing the status of the settlement negotiations, evaluating settlement prospects, and recommending the termination or continuation of the settlement negotiations.
( c ) *Termination of settlement negotiations.* Settlement negotiations shall terminate upon the order of the presiding ALJ issued after consultation with the settlement judge. The conduct of settlement negotiations shall not unduly delay the commencement of the hearing.
[61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 13723, Mar. 13, 2008; 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,642
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,837
<INVENTORY>                                     12,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,732
<PP&E>                                          42,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,525
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,094
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,525
<SALES>                                         70,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,483
<CGS>                                           61,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (387)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER VI—WATER RIGHT APPLICATIONS AND LAND ENTRIES
### SERVED: September 25, 2013 US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0040
NOTICE IraLeibowitz, Attorney-Advisorisretiring on September 30, 2013. All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: Richard C. Goodwin, U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, Attn: Room E11-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 (Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov) Administrative matters should be directed to PatriciaMatthews, StaffAssistant (202) 366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews({V,dot.gov)

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List2

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2WI000 1 ONE COPY 

### Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

### Michael L. 

### Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 465 California Street, Suite 210 San Francisco, CA 94104-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 James Archier, Complainant's Counsel 

### Agency Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region Federal AviationAdministration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 6E Fort Worth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5092 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202.:366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### § 203.391 Title objection waiver with reduced insurance benefits.

Payment of an insurance claim will not automatically be refused solely because the title evidence reveals a condition of title not taken into consideration in the original appraisal and not covered by the provisions of § 203.389 of this part, or not otherwise waived in writing by the Secretary. In such instances, the Secretary may, at his or her option, approve the payment of a claim if the mortgagee agrees to accept a reduction in insurance benefits considered adequate by the Secretary to compensate for any anticipated loss to the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund as a result of the existence of the title condition at the time of claim.

[57 FR 47974, Oct. 20, 1992]
§ 203.492 Assignments, pledges and transfers by approved lender. ( a ) An assignment, pledge or transfer of an insured loan or group of insured loans, not constituting a final sale, may be made by an approved lender to another approved lender provided the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) The assignor, pledgor or transferor shall remain the lender of record.
( 2 ) The Commissioner shall have no obligation to recognize or deal with any party other than the lender of record with respect to the rights, benefits and obligations of the lender under the contract of insurance.
( b ) An assignment or transfer of an insured loan or group of insured loans may be made by an approved lender to other than an approved lender provided the requirements under paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section are met and the following additional requirements are met: ( 1 ) The assignee or transferee shall be a corporation, trust or organization (including but not limited to any pension trust or profit-sharing plan) which certifies to the approved lender that: ( i ) It has assets of $100,000 or more; and
( ii ) It has lawful authority to hold an insured loan or group of insured loans.
( 2 ) The assignment or transfer shall be made pursuant to an agreement under which the transferor or assignor is obligated to take one of the following alternate courses of action within one year from the date of the assignment or within such additional period of time as may be approved by the Commissioner: ( i ) The transferor or assignor shall repurchase and accept a reassignment of such loan or group of loans.
( ii ) The transferor or assignor shall obtain a sale and transfer of such loan or group of loans to an approved lender.
( c ) Notice to or approval of the Commissioner is not required in connection with assignments, pledges or transfers pursuant to this section.
§ 14.325 Extensions of time and further proceedings. ( a ) The adjudicative officer on motion and for good cause shown may grant extensions of time other than for filing an application for fees and expenses after final disposition in the adversary adjudication.
( b ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or agency counsel, or on his or her own initiative, the adjudicative officer may order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions, or as to issues other than substantial justification (such as the applicant's eligibility or substantiation of fees and expenses), pertinent discovery or an evidentiary hearing. Such further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible. Whether or not the position of the agency was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the administrative record, as a whole, which is made in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought.
( c ) A request that the adjudicative officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
### §4332a. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title I, §1304(j)(2), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1386

Section, Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, §1319, July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 551, related to accelerated decisionmaking in environmental reviews.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2015, see section 1003 of Pub. L. 114–94, set out as an Effective Date of 2015 Amendment note under section 5313 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Malachi Hook and Rudolph Byrd, Appellants.

Two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, one as to defendant Byrd, rendered March 24, 1976, and one as to defendant Hook, rendered March 29, 1976, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
#### § 125.106 Waivers.

Upon determination of good cause, the Assistant Secretary may waive, in a published Notice of Funding Availability or other Federal Register notice, any requirement in this part that is not required by statute.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vertrue Incorporated (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary A.
Johnson, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gary A. Johnson
-------------------
Gary A. Johnson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Vertrue Incorporated
November 9, 2005






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.