alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 19.6-3 Application for payment. ( a ) To receive payment from the Fund pursuant to a court award, the beneficiary must submit an application in writing to the Chief of the Retirement Division (PER/ER/RET), Department of State, Washington, DC 20520. The application must be typed or printed, signed by the beneficiary, and include— ( 1 ) The full name, date of birth, current address and current marital status of the beneficiary;
( 2 ) Full name and date of birth of the participant or former participant and his/her date of birth or other identifying information;
( 3 ) Relationship to the beneficiary, and if a spouse or former spouse, date of marriage to and/or divorce from the participant;
( 4 ) A statement that the court order has not been amended, superseded, or set aside; The original of the court order or a recently certified copy must be enclosed with the application, or a statement appended that such a copy has been sent to the Department by other means.
( b ) When payments are subject to termination upon the occurrence of a condition subsequent, such as marriage, remarriage or termination of schooling, or death of the principal, no payment will be made until the beneficiary submits a statement to PER/ER/RET that— ( 1 ) The condition has not occured;
( 2 ) He/she will notify the Department (PER/ER/RET) within 15 calendar days of the occurrence of the condition subsequent; and
( 3 ) He/she will be personally liable for any overpayment to him/her resulting from the occurrence of the condition subsequent. PER/ER/RET may require periodic recertification of these statements.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Developmentally Appropriate PracticesDisabilitiesHigh Risk StudentsInclusive SchoolsIndividual NeedsIndividualized Education ProgramsIndividualized Family Service PlansIndividualized InstructionPreschool ChildrenPreschool EducationResource MaterialsSpecial Needs StudentsStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Case 3:09-cv-00171-JSC Document 33 Filed 04/28/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:09-cv-00171-JL Document32 Filed04/26/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-00171-JSC Document 33 Filed 04/28/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:09-cv-00171-JL Document32 Filed04/26/10 Page2 of 3
Case 3:09-cv-00171-JSC Document 33 Filed 04/28/10 Page 3 of 3 Case3:09-cv-00171-JL Document32 Filed04/26/10 Page3 of 3
```

[110th Congress Public Law 89]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ089.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 982]]

Public Law 110-89
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To extend the trade adjustment assistance program under the Trade Act of 
       1974 for 3 months. <<NOTE: Sept. 28, 2007 -  [H.R. 3375]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE 
                              PROGRAM.

    (a) Assistance for Workers.--Section 245(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2317(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2007'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2007''.
    (b) Assistance for Firms.--Section 256(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2346(b)) is amended by inserting after ``2007,'' the 
following: ``and $4,000,000 for the 3-month period beginning on October 
1, 2007,''.
    (c) Assistance for Farmers.--Section 298(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2401g(a)) is amended by inserting before the period the 
following: ``, and there are authorized to be appropriated and there are 
appropriated to the Department of Agriculture to carry out this chapter 
$9,000,000 for the 3-month period beginning on October 1, 2007''.
    (d) <<NOTE: 19 USC 2271 note prec.>> Extension of Termination 
Dates.--Section 285 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271 note) is 
amended by striking ``September 30'' each place it appears and inserting 
``December 31''.

    (e) Effective Date.--The <<NOTE: 19 USC 2317 note.>> amendments made 
by this section shall be effective as of October 1, 2007.
SEC. 2. OFFSETS.

    (a) Time for Payment of Corporate Estimated Taxes.--Subparagraph (B) 
of section 401(1) of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act 
of 2005 is <<NOTE: 26 USC 6655 note.>> amended by striking ``114.75 
percent'' and inserting ``115 percent''.

    (b) Customs User Fees.--Section 13031(j)(3)(B)(i) of the 
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C.

[[Page 121 STAT. 983]]

58c(j)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2014'' and 
inserting ``October 7, 2014''.

    Approved September 28, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3375:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-345 (Comm. on Ways and Means).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

M.B.,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1126

[January 11, 2024]

Appeal from the Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 20F07349.

Nancy E. Wright, Gainesville, for appellant.

Carrie B. McNamara, Deputy General Counsel of Agency for Persons 

with Disabilities, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00235-CV

IN THE MATTER OF C.O., A JUVENILE §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 323rd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (323-115526-21)

December 16, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Birdwell

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsShuttle communication and tracking systems signal design and interface compatibility analysisVarious options for the Dedicated Payload Communication Link (DPCL) were evaluated. Specific subjects addressed include: payload to DPCL power transfer in the proximity of the payload, DPCL antenna pointing considerations, and DPCL transceiver implementations which can be mounted on the deployed antenna boom. Additional analysis of the Space Telescope performance was conducted. The feasibility of using the Global Positioning System (GPS) for attitude determination and control for large spacecraft was examined. The objective of the Shuttle Orbiter Radar Test and Evaluation (SORTE) program was to quantify the Ku-band radar tracking accuracy using White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) radar and optical tracking equipment, with helicopter and balloon targets.Document ID19870009260Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJune 16, 1986Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberAXIOMATIX-R8606-3NASA-CR-171974NAS 1.26:171974Accession Number87N18693Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17384Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009260.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 107.55 Compliance report. ( a ) Following completion of efforts under this part, the Director of the Office of Regional FH&EO or a designee shall prepare a compliance report promptly and the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO shall make a finding of compliance or noncompliance. If it is found that the respondent is in compliance, all persons concerned shall be notified of the finding. Where a finding of noncompliance is made, the report shall specify the violations found. The Director of the Office of Regional FH&EO shall send a copy of the report to the respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested, together with a Notice that the matter will be forwarded to the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO for a determination as to whether actions will be initiated for the imposition of sanctions. The Regional Director of the Office having jurisdiction over the programs involved and the Area Manager shall also receive a copy of the report and the notice of intention to refer the matter to the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO.
( b ) The Notice will provide that the respondent shall have seven (7) days to respond to the violations found and resolve and remedy matters in the compliance report. At the expiration of the seven (7) day period the matter shall be referred to the Assistant Secretary for FH&EO.
( c ) The complainant shall be sent a copy of the findings and compliance report and shall have seven (7) days to comment thereon.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2439 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain flame retardant plasticizers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain flame retardant 

plasticizers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FLAME RETARDANT PLASTICIZERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 Diphenyl cresyl phosphate 

(CAS No. 26444–49–5) 

(provided for in subheading 

2919.00.25) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ......

9902.05.71 Phosphoric Acid, tris (2- 

ethylhexyl) ester (CAS No. 

78–42–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2919.00.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2439 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §6372h. Administration; detailed description in annual report

(a) The Secretary may prescribe such rules as may be necessary in order to carry out the provisions of this part.

(b) The Secretary shall include in his annual report a detailed description of the actions taken under this part in the preceding fiscal year and the actions planned to be taken in the subsequent fiscal year. Such description shall show the allocations made (including the allocations made to each State) and include information on the technical assistance carried out with funds allocated, and an estimate of the energy savings, if any, achieved.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §400I, as added Pub. L. 95–619, title III, §311(a), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3253; amended Pub. L. 96–470, title II, §203(a), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2242; Pub. L. 105–388, §5(a)(13), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3479.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–388 struck out comma after "Secretary shall".

1980—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–470 substituted "include in his annual report a detailed description" for "within one year after November 9, 1978, and annually thereafter while funds are available under this part, submit to the Congress a detailed report" and "Such description" for "Such report".
#### Fieldston Property Owners’ Association, Inc., Appellant, v. James P. Bianchi et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Bergan, JJ. [29 Misc 2d 326],
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-106-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
### §6250d. Exemptions

An action taken under this part is not subject to the rulemaking requirements of section 6393 of this title, section 7191 of this title, or section 553 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §185, as added Pub. L. 106–469, title II, §201(a)(3), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2036.)
### §6806. Statement in annual report

The Secretary shall include in each annual report submitted under section 7267 of this title a statement with respect to activities conducted under this subchapter and recommendations as to the need for and types of further Federal legislation.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title II, §206, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1144; Pub. L. 95–617, title I, §143, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3134; Pub. L. 96–470, title II, §203(g), Oct. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 2243.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–470 substituted "The Secretary shall include in each annual report submitted under section 7267 of this title a statement" for "Not later than the last day in December in each year, the Secretary shall transmit to the Congress a report".

1978—Pub. L. 95–617 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator", meaning Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration.
#### § 9.2 Objective.

The objective of the Department's classification program is to ensure that national security information is protected from unauthorized disclosure, but that it remains classified only to the extent and for such a period as is necessary.
#### Hegwood *v.*The State.

June 12, 1912.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Jones. Habersham superior court. April 13, 1912.

*J. J. Kimsey*and *Sam Kimzey,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. S. Felder, attorney-general,*and *Robert McMillan, solicitor-general,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

1. It is only where a case is solely dependent upon cireum•stantial evidence that the court is required to instruct the jury as to the law of such evidence. Accordingly, where the charge in the indictment is supported by both circumstantial and direct evidence, it is not error for the court to omit to give in charge the law of circumstantial evidence. *Nobles*v. *State,*127 *Ga.*212 (5), 213 (56 S. E. 125).

2. Where, in a ease dependent upon both positive and circumstantial evidence, the court gave in charge Penal Code § 1013, that, “Whether dependent upon positive or circumstantial evidence, the true question in • criminal cases is, not whether it be possible that the conclusion at which the testimony points may be false, but whether there be sufficient testimony to satisfy the mind and conscience beyond a reasonable doubt,” such instruction was not erroneous because the court, in the absence of a request, failed to define to the jury the meaning of positive and circumstantial evidence.

3. - After giving the jury the definition of voluntary manslaughter as contained in the Penal Code, the court gave the following charge: “ So 'you will observe that if the deceased . . made an actual assault upon the defendant, or if the deceased attempted to commit a serious personal injury upon the defendant, or if there were other equivalent circumstances to justify the excitement of passion, the grade of the homicide, if there was a homicide, may be reduced to voluntary manslaughter.” It was not cause for a new trial that the word “ may ” instead of “ should ” was used in the concluding paragraph of this charge.

4. The other assignments of error upon the charge of the court are so clearly without merit as not to require further consideration.

5. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §5115a. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–188, title I, §1808(d), Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1904

Section, Pub. L. 103–382, title V, §553, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4056, related to multiethnic placements.
#### Bruning Lumber Company, Inc., defendant in error, v. John Magnuson, plaintiff in error.

Suit to foreclose mechanic’s lien to recover value of lumber. Decree for complainant. Error to the Circuit Court of Mason county; the Hon. Guy R. Williams, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 17, 1923.

Rehearing denied April 3, 1923.

Arthur Keithley, for plaintiff in error. Nortrup, Nortrup & Hayes, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
*E-Filed 4/19/10*

Case 3:08-cv-04907-RS Document 40 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2
16

Case 3:08-cv-04907-RS Document 40 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE 2ND QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 CONTAINED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          68,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (741)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,587
<PP&E>                                          15,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,837)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,690
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,816
<SALES>                                         52,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,180
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,814
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   129
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 2 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 3 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 4 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 5 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 6 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 7 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 8 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 9 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 10 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 11 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 12 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 13 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 14 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 15 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 16 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 17 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 18 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 19 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 20 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 21 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 22 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 23 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 24 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 25 of 26Case 3:09-cv-00873-JSW Document 12 Filed 02/17/10 Page 26 of 26
Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

Residential 

Dishwashers, 

Dehumidifiers, and 

Cooking Products 

and Commercial 

Clothes Washers 

Analysis Tools 

The analytical spreadsheets 

below provide rulemaking 

findings and interactive tools for 

the life-cycle cost analysis, 

national impact analysis, 

government regulatory impact 

model, and regulatory impact 

analysis. Instructions on how to 

use the life-cycle cost analysis 

and national impact analysis 

spreadsheets can be found in 

the Technical Support 

Document. 

Life Cycle Cost and Payback 

Period Spreadsheets 

z Life Cycle Cost Analysis 

for Commercial Clothes 

Washers (Excel 435 KB) 

z Life Cycle Cost Analysis 

for Cooktops (Excel 1.2 

MB) 

z Life Cycle Cost Analysis 

for Ovens (Excel 1.3 MB) 

z Life Cycle Cost Analysis 

for Microwave Ovens 

(Excel 1.2 MB) 

National Impact Analysis 

Spreadsheets 

z National Impact Analysis 

Tool for Commercial 

EERE Information Center 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/home_appl_analys... 12/1/2008

EE2006STD0127 COMMENT 41.3
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 11/25/2008 

Clothes Washers (Excel

827 KB) 

z National Impact Analysis 

Tool for Cooktops and 

Ovens (Excel 2 MB) 

z National Impact Analysis 

Tool for Microwave Ovens 

(Excel 647 KB) 

Government Regulatory 

Impact Model Spreadsheets 

z Government Regulatory 

Impact Model for 

Commercial Clothes 

Washers (Excel 1.4 MB) 

z Government Regulatory 

Impact Model for 

Cooktops and Ovens 

(Excel 2.9 MB) 

z Government Regulatory 

Impact Model for 

Microwave Ovens (Excel

1.3 MB) 

Regulatory Impact Analysis 

Spreadsheets 

z Regulatory Impact 

Analysis Tool for 

Commercial Clothes 

Washers (Excel 1.9 MB) 

z Regulatory Impact 

Analysis Tool for Cooktops 

and Ovens (Excel 2.4 MB) 

z Regulatory Impact 

Analysis Tool for 

Microwave Ovens (Excel

2.5 MB) 

Printable Version 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/home_appl_analys... 12/1/2008

EE2006STD0127 COMMENT 41.3