alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUANERFE ORDONEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 71133

Agency No. A070

- 080

- 715

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 4, 2020 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Guanerfe Ordonez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder , 597

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 71133

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ordonez’s untimely and

number

- barred motion to reopen where Ordonez failed to demonstrate a material

change in country conditions in Guatemala to qualify for an exception to the time

and num ber limitations for filing a motion to reopen

. S ee 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi , 597 F.3d at 990

- 91 (BIA did not abuse its discretion

where evidence of general country conditions was not material to petitioner’s

claim).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen proceedings

sua sponte. See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court

has jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the

limited purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or

constitutional error.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 04-73; MB Docket No. 02-164, RM-10476]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Cimarron, NM

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Sierra Grande Broadcasting filed a petition for rule making 
proposing the allotment of Channel 236C2 at Cimarron, New Mexico, as 
the community's first local aural transmission service. See 67 FR 
47502, July 19, 2002. Petitioner subsequently filed an amendment 
requesting the allotment of Channel 296C1 in lieu of Channel 236C2 at 
Cimarron, New Mexico. The new proposal to allot Channel 296C1 at 
Cimarron conflicts with a pending petition to allot Channel 296A at Las 
Vegas, New Mexico, and will be considered in the context of that 
proceeding. A showing of continuing interest is required before a 
channel will be allotted. It is the Commission's policy to refrain from 
making an allotment to a community absent an expression of interest. 
Therefore, we will dismiss petitioner's petition in the instant 
proceeding.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 02-164, adopted January 14, 2004, and 
released January 20, 2004 . The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Information Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, Qualex International, 
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 04-2834 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.850 Physical condition standards and physical inspection requirements.

The requirements in 24 CFR part 5, subpart G, are applicable to the multifamily properties assisted or insured that are listed in 24 CFR 5.701.

[88 FR 30498, May 11, 2023]
NEPA PROCESS AND SCHEDULE (wera - national Environmental Policy Act)

National Park Service



SITE LOCATION & CONTEXT.

Location of GU Property
Subject to Land Exchange

1.200
Feet

wz National Park Service

stavice

*

GEORGETOWN
UNIVERSITY

Project Location

Washington
Canoe Club

Potomac
Boat Club

Gee,
re
Me, Tew,
Mo}, Shi
ria} Palieaton
Way

M Street, NW

Whitehurst Freeway.

Washington i &
Harbour

T. Roosevelt Island Thompson
Boat Center



i
Project Site (Tract 102-114) Upstream Site (Tract 102-109)

Trt National Park Service

stavice

Ct
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0363**
### §8005. Eligibility for services

#### (a) Professional assessment committee for determination of eligibility

The identification of project residents eligible to participate in a congregate services program assisted under this chapter, and the designation of the services appropriate to their individual functional abilities and needs, shall be made by a professional assessment committee. Such committee shall utilize procedures which insure that the process of determining eligibility of individuals for services under this title shall accord such individuals fair treatment and due process and a right of appeal of such determination of eligibility, and shall also assure the confidentiality of personal and medical records.

#### (b) Participation of other residents in meal services program

Other residents may participate in a congregate meal service program assisted under this chapter if the local public housing agency or nonprofit corporation determines that the participation of these individuals will not adversely affect the cost-effectiveness or operation of the program.

#### (c) Notification of change in membership of professional assessment committee

Any public housing agency or nonprofit corporation receiving assistance under this chapter shall notify the Secretary of any change in the membership of the professional assessment committee within thirty days of such change. Such notification shall list the names and professional qualifications of new members of the committee.

#### (d) Procedure for changes in membership of professional assessment committee

Procedures shall be established to insure that changes in the membership of the professional assessment committee are consistent with the requirements of section 8002(7) of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–557, title IV, §406, Oct. 31, 1978, 92 Stat. 2107.)
### §6611. Establishment of Office

There is established in the Executive Office of the President an Office of Science and Technology Policy (hereinafter referred to in this subchapter as the "Office").

(Pub. L. 94–282, title II, §202, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 463.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of this subchapter as the "Presidential Science and Technology Advisory Organization Act of 1976", see section 201 of Pub. L. 94–282, set out as a Short Title note under section 6601 of this title.

#### High-Resolution Information System Advisory Board

Pub. L. 102–245, title V, §501, Feb. 14, 1992, 106 Stat. 22, authorized the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to establish within that office a High-Resolution Information Systems Advisory Board to monitor and, as appropriate, foster the development and competitiveness of United States-based high-resolution information systems industries, further provided that "high-resolution information systems" means equipment and techniques required to create, store, recover, and play back high-resolution images and accompanying sound, further provided for functions of the Board, including provision of guidance and advice relating to establishment of such industries as well as transfer of Federal technologies to the private sector, further provided for membership and procedures of the Board, including submission of annual report of its activities to the President and Congress, and further provided for limitation on functions of Board and appropriations through fiscal year 1993.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

JORGE ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant. /

No. CR 09-0621 WHA

ORDER REQUESTING

DEFENDANT RESPONSE TO

ORDER OF THE COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE NINTH

CIRCUIT

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has remanded this case “for the limited

purpose of permitting the district court to provide appellant notice and an opportunity to request

that the time for filing the notice of appeal be extended . . . based on a showing of excusable

neglect,” pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4) (Dkt. No. 29). This order

requests a response by defendant — concerning his reason for delay in filing a notice of appeal

— by SEPTEMBER 6, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 23, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cr-00621-WHA Document 30 Filed 08/23/10 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH SCHEINUCK, 

Plaintiff, 

 v.

CAPTAIN D. SEPULVEDA,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-0727 WHA (PR) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED

Within 10 days of the date this order is filed, defendant shall file an opposition showing

cause why plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery (docket number 27 filed on May 3, 2010)

should not be granted. If defendant fails to do so, plaintiff’s motion will be granted. Plaintiff

may file a reply to defendant’s opposition within 7 days of the date the opposition is filed. 

No further extensions of the deadlines set in this order will be granted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7 , 2010 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

G:\PRO-SE\WHA\CR.09\SCHEINUCK0727.OSC.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-00727-WHA Document 28 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,877,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              302,412,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,068
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             306,753,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,547,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 286,205,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               306,753,294
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,357,183
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,144,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,671,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                35,287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,177,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,177,888
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,177,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                45,060.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2797 

To amend the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent 

Offender Registration Act to extend registration requirements to juvenile 

sex offenders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005 

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children 

and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act to extend 

registration requirements to juvenile sex offenders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aime Zyla Act of 

5 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2797 IH 

1 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION REQUIRED FOR JUVENILE SEX OF2 FENDERS. 

3 Section 170101(a)(1) of the Violent Crime Control 

4 and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 

5 14071(a)(1)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara7 graph (A); 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub9 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(C) a person who was adjudicated a juve12 nile delinquent for conduct that would be an of13 fense described in subparagraph (A) or (B) if 

14 committed by an adult to register as required 

15 under subparagraph (A) or (B) if the adjudica16 tion were a conviction for the offense.’’. 

Æ
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS 

DOCKET NO. F AA-2015-3306 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015NM720020) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Greg G. Stofko, Respondent's Counsel 

Senior Attorney 

Regulatory Affairs 

Federal Express 

ONE COPY 

1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 950 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

TEL: 202-393-9285 

greg.stofko@fedex.com 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

Hon. J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-3306 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited cowier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2~
#### City of Tallapoosa *v.*Brock.

August 19, 1912.

Action for damages. Before Judge Edwards. Haralson superior court. May 13, 1911.

*Lloyd Thomas*and *M. J. Head,*for plaintiff in error.

*U. G. Brock,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. In bringing suit against a municipal corporation for damages on account of a personal injury, it is necessary to allege a substantial compliance with the Civil Code, § 910, which requires a presentation in writing of such claim to the governing authority of the municipality/for adjustment, stating the time, place, etc., before bringing suit, and allows the municipal authorities thirty days in which to act on the claim. A petition which fails to do this is demurrable. *Saunders*v. *City of Fitzgerald,*113 *Ga.*619 (38 S. E. 978); *City of Columbus*v. *McDaniel,*117 *Ga.*823 (45 S. E. 59); *Langley*v. *City Council of Augusta,*118 *Ga.*590 (45 S. E. 486, 98 Am. St. R. 133).

2. A petition alleged a personal injury resulting from a defect in a sidewalk of a city, and that on a named date á notice was served, a copy of which was set out. It was directed to the mayor and served on him, and merely notified him that the injured person would file suit against the city for the injury (describing it and the time, place, and cause of its occurrence) to a term of the superior court which would convene several months after the date of the notice. *Meld,*that such a notice merely of an intention to sue the city, directed to the mayor, was not such a presentation of the claim or demand to the governing authorities for adjustment as to meet the requirements of the statute.

3. There was no error in overruling the demurrer on the other grounds thereof. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
QOT-OST- 9000-\^^S\ 

YOUR SUCCESS IS OUR BUSINESS 

April 23, 2010 

To: The United States Department of Transportation 

Subject: Essential Air Service, Attention Dennis DeVaney 

The Greater Johnstown/Cambria County Chamber of Commerce supports Colgan Air's 

continued service as Essential Air Service to the John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria 

County Airport (JST). 

As a valued member of the Chamber, Colgan has demonstrated a willingness to work 

with the local business community to adjust schedules and times as needed to better 

serve the community. 

We feel that Colgan's offer to provide three round trips each weekday and weekend 

flights as well with both non-stop and one-stop service between Johnstown-AltoonaWashington Dulles would provide the most beneficial service to our region. 

The continued growth and success of the John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria County 

Airport is critical to the economic development of our region and we feel this can best be 

accomplished through a continuing and positive relationship with Colgan Air. 

Best regards. 

Robert F. Layo 

President & CEO
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 50466 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Esmeralda Diaz,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:22
- CR
- 1395 - 1

**______________________ ________**  Before **Higginbotham, Stewart,** and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Esmeralda Diaz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Diaz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele vant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 14, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50466 Document: 00517063508 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/14/2024No. 23
- 50466

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respon sibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-50466 Document: 00517063508 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/14/2024
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Robinson, Respondent, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Appellant.

The certificate of the County Clerk attached to the record states that the “minutes of the hearing” are certified. No minutes are included in the record as filed and we deem the record accordingly to be incomplete. The ease is restored to the calendar and the appellant is directed to file a supplemental record on appeal which shall include the minutes of the hearing and any additional papers pertaining to this appeal which have been omitted.
Board of Directors Compensation, as amended



  
 EXHIBIT 10.1 

SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP. 

Board of Directors Compensation 
 Cash
Compensation 
  

							
	 Annual Board Retainer
	  	$	 40,000	  	  	
			
	 Annual Board Committee Member Retainers:
	  				  	
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	  	  	
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	  	  	
	 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	  	$	7,500	  	  	
	 Executive Committee
	  	$	10,000	  	  	
			
	 Annual Board Chair
Retainer1
	  	$	110,000	  	  	
			
	 Annual Committee Chair Retainers:2
	  				  	
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	  	  	
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	  	  	
	 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	  	$	7,500	  	  	
	 Executive
Committee3
	  	$	15,000	  	  	
			
	 Annual Lead Director Retainer
	  	$	5,000	  	  	
	  
	  				  	
	 1In addition, the Board Chair shall be provided with an office and administrative support for the duration of his tenure. The Board Chair does not receive any
other compensation for his service on the Board or any of its committees.

	
	 2The committee chair will receive both an annual committee member retainer and annual committee chair retainer.

	
	 3In addition, the Executive Committee Chair shall be provided with an office and administrative support for a period through October
2011.

			
	Equity Compensation	  				  	
	
	 At the discretion of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee – no equity awards were made in 2009 or 2010.

			
	Director Stock Purchase Plan	  				  	
			
	 Annual maximum company cash contribution per director participant to

company-sponsored open market stock purchase plan, with company’s
 contribution to 50% of director participant’s cash contribution, subject
 to annual maximum
contribution limit by director of $20,000.
	  	$	10,000
### SUBCHAPTER XI—MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF WORKS GENERALLY
§ 203.362 Conditions for withdrawal of application for insurance benefits. With the consent of the Commissioner, a mortgagee may withdraw an application for insurance benefits if the mortgagee agrees that it will: ( a ) Accept a reconveyance of the property under a deed which warrants against the acts of the Commissioner and all claiming by, through, or under him; and
( b ) Promptly file a reconveyance for record; and
( c ) Accept without continuation the title evidence which it furnished the Commissioner; and
( d ) Reimburse the Commissioner for property expenditures as set forth in § 203.364.
#### § 241.3 The Guarantee.

Subject to the terms and conditions set out in this part, the United States of America, acting through USAID, guarantees to Noteholders the Borrower's repayment of 100% of principal and interest due on Eligible Notes. Under this Guarantee, USAID agrees to pay to any Noteholder compensation in Dollars equal to such Noteholder's Loss of Investment under its Eligible Note; provided, however, that no such payment shall be made to any Noteholder for any such loss arising out of fraud or misrepresentation for which such Noteholder is responsible or of which it had knowledge at the time it became such Noteholder. This Guarantee shall apply to each Eligible Note registered on the Note Register required to be maintained by the Fiscal Agent.