alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5193. Amount of assistance

#### (a) Federal share

The Federal share for assistance provided under this subchapter shall be equal to not less than 75 percent of the eligible costs.

#### (b) Limit on amount of assistance

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), total assistance provided under this subchapter for a single emergency shall not exceed $5,000,000.

#### (2) Additional assistance

The limitation described in paragraph (1) may be exceeded when the President determines that—

(A) continued emergency assistance is immediately required;

(B) there is a continuing and immediate risk to lives, property, public health or safety; and

(C) necessary assistance will not otherwise be provided on a timely basis.

#### (3) Report

Whenever the limitation described in paragraph (1) is exceeded, the President shall report to the Congress on the nature and extent of emergency assistance requirements and shall propose additional legislation if necessary.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title V, §503, as added Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §107(a), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4707.)
### §§6261 to 6264. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §104(1), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2033

Section 6261, Pub. L. 94–163, title II, §201, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 890; Pub. L. 96–102, title I, §§103(b)(1), (c)(1), 105(a)(1)–(3), (5), Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 751, 755, 756; H. Res. 549, Mar. 25, 1980, required the President to transmit to Congress energy conservation contingency plans and rationing contingency plans and provided requirements for plans to become effective and for amendment, approval, and implementation of plans.

Section 6262, Pub. L. 94–163, title II, §202, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 892; Pub. L. 96–102, title II, §231, Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 767, provided requirements for energy conservation contingency plans.

Section 6263, Pub. L. 94–163, title II, §203, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 892; Pub. L. 96–102, title I, §§103(a), (c)(2), 104, 105(b)(1)–(5), Nov. 5, 1979, 93 Stat. 751, 755, 756, provided requirements for rationing contingency plan, and in subsec. (f) provided that all authority to carry out a plan would expire on same date as authority to issue and enforce rules and orders under the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, 15 U.S.C. 751 et seq.

Section 6264, Pub. L. 94–163, title II, §204, as added Pub. L. 99–58, title I, §104(b), July 2, 1985, 99 Stat. 104, provided that except as provided in section 6263(f) of this title, authority to carry out the provisions of sections 6261 to 6264 of this title and any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to such sections expired at midnight, June 30, 1985.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Waldron P. Belknap, Deceased. Jennet R. Myers, Individually and as General and Ancillary Guardian of the Property of William H. Graham, Jr., an Infant, et al., Appellants; Elisabeth H. Belknap, as Executrix of Maitland Belknap, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding for the settlement of the final account of the surviving trustee and of the executors of a deceased trustee under the trust created by Article Fourth of the will of Waldron P. Belknap, deceased, and for the judicial construction of such article, the surviving remaindermen of said trust appeal from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County, dated October 10, 1961, as construed said article and as directed distribution of a one-fourth share of the trust remainder to the estate of Maitland Belknap, a nonsurviving remainderman. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC LAW 111–278—OCT. 13, 2010 124 STAT. 2901 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5390: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

July 14, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–278 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13301 

Smith Road in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ‘‘David John Donafee Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DAVID JOHN DONAFEE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 13301 Smith Road in Cleveland, Ohio, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘David John Donafee Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘David John Donafee Post Office Building’’. 

Approved October 13, 2010. 

Oct. 13, 2010 

[H.R. 5390] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DANIEL NICHOLAS JENKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1263

[October 21, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Jeffrey Walton Hendriks, Judge; L.T. Case Nos.

562020CT000663A, 562020MM000805A, and 562020MM000741A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0 3 90 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - CE - 0 1 3 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
No. II-12-005 March 29, 2012

CONTACT: Roger Hannah (404) 997-4417 E-mail: OPA2@nrc.gov

 Joey Ledford (404) 997-4416

NRC SCHEDULES MEETING TO DISCUSS 2011 PERFORMANCE 

OF HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has scheduled a meeting for Monday, 

April 9 to discuss the agency’s assessment of safety performance during 2011 at the Harris

nuclear power plant. The plant, operated by Progress Energy, is located near New Hill, N.C., 

about 20 miles southwest of Raleigh.

The meeting, which is open to the public, is scheduled to begin with an open house and 

poster session at 5:45 p.m. EDT at the Holly Springs Cultural Center, 300 West Ballentine Street 

in Holly Springs. At 7 p.m., the NRC staff will make a presentation and then be available to 

answer questions on the safety performance of the Harris plant, as well as the agency’s role in 

ensuring safe plant operation. 

“During 2011, our inspectors spent many hours ensuring that the Harris plant met NRC 

safety requirements and protected both people living near the plant and the overall environment,” 

NRC Region II Administrator Victor McCree said.

NRC inspectors also looked at whether there were immediate safety concerns at Harris 

and other U.S. plants after the March events at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan. Those 

reviews found that the plants remained safe.

A letter sent from the NRC Region II office to plant officials addresses the performance 

of the plant during 2011 and will serve as the basis for the meeting discussion. It is available on 

the NRC web site at: www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/LETTERS/har_2011q4.pdf .

The NRC found that the Harris plant’s 2011 performance met all of the agency’s safety 

objectives and was at a level that results in no additional NRC oversight. This year, the NRC

plans to conduct the very detailed inspections required at those plants that are operating well. 

All the inspection findings and performance indicators at the Harris plant during the most 

recent quarter had very low safety significance and were classified as “green.”

 The NRC uses color-coded inspection findings and performance indicators to assess plant 

performance. The colors start with “green,” which has very low safety significance, to “white,” 

NRC NEWS

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Office of Public Affairs, Region II

245 Peachtree Center Ave. NE, Suite 1200

Atlanta, GA 30303-1257

Web Site: www.nrc.gov
“yellow” or “red,” based on the significance of the issues. Inspection findings and performance 

indicators are updated on the NRC’s web site (www.nrc.gov) each quarter. 

Current performance information for the Harris plant is available on the NRC web site at

www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/HAR1/har1_chart.html . 

###
# OAR Box 1830

Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 5 ) IV-B- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:51 AM Sheet 5of 232 p. 1

### • o UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5 P. 2 

### A-67-i i 1 2 -6 ~ oJ L

OC T5198 T OFFIC E O F AI R AN D RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU

M SUBJECT : Statu s o f Suggeste d Revision s

Vehicl e Safet yRequirement s t o OMC S Heavy-Dut y

FROM : TO : THRU : Pau l M . Laing , chemica l Enginee r

Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc h< r 

## %JL,o>& Th e Recor d Glen n W . Passavant , Senio r Projec t Manage r ^UQ** 1 '-' v*AA*uro> ^ Standard s Developmen t an d Support , Branc h Cheste r J . France , Chi e Standard s Developmen t a The Offic e o f Moto r Carrie r Safety(OMCS ) require s al l liqui d fue l tank s (o n heavy-dut yvehicles ) ove r 2 5 gallon s i n capacit yt o b e abl e t o accep t fue l a t a rat e o f 2 0 gallon s pe r minut e (gpm) . Earlie r thi s yea r (Ma y27) , we suggeste d a chang e t o thi s requiremen t in respons e t o the OMC S February26 , 198 7 reques t for commen t (5 2 F R 5892 ) o

n th e propose d revision s t o the Federa l Moto r Carrie r Safet yRegulations . A t the time o f our suggestion , our draf t NPR M containe d provision s t o limi t futur e in-us e gasolin e dispensing rate s t o ten gpm , (an d sinc e tha t tim

e w e hav e formall ypropose d thi s requirement) . Therefore , w e suggeste d the OMC S minimu mfil l rat e requiremen t b e change d for gasolin e fue l tank s t o specif ya minimu m acceptanc e rat e o f ten gpm . On Septembe r 11 , 1987 , I receive d a phon e cal l fro mJi m Britel l o f OMC S informing me o f th e statu s o f our suggeste d revision . Becaus e ou r comment s wer e on a sectio n o f the OMC S regulation s whic h wer e no t directl ypar t o f the OMC S proposa l i n February , the fil l rat e requiremen t wil l no t ge t change d i n the upcoming fina l rule . However , OMC S intend s t o chang e thi s requiremen t a s we hav e suggeste d a t a late r dat e througha n additiona l proposa l an d fina l rule . The yanticipate d thi s woul d dela

ythe chang e b

yapproximatel ysi x month s ove r ho w lon g i t woul d hav e taken ha d the ybee n abl e t o mak e the chang e throughth

e curren t proposal . Even wit hthi s delay , the OMC S revision s woul d b e mad e wel l i n advanc e o f our propose d onboar d requirements .P. 3 

### '?>

As par t o f ou r Ma y27 , 198 7 comments , w e als o suggeste d tha t OMC S shoul d includ e provision s i n thei r regulation s fo r the prope r handling o f evaporativ e emissio n contro l system s during the safet ytesting o f HDG V fue l tanks . Ji m Britel l informe d m

e tha t OMC S intend s t o investigat e thi s suggestio n a t a late r date . The specifi c timing o f thi s investigatio n wa s no t mad e clear . cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
### §7144b. Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence

#### (a) Definitions

In this section, the terms "intelligence community" and "National Intelligence Program" have the meanings given such terms in section 3003 of title 50.

#### (b) In general

There is in the Department an Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence. Such office shall be under the National Intelligence Program.

#### (c) Director

(1) The head of the Office shall be the Director of the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, who shall be an employee in the Senior Executive Service, the Senior Intelligence Service, the Senior National Intelligence Service, or any other Service that the Secretary, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, considers appropriate. The Director of the Office shall report directly to the Secretary.

(2) The Secretary shall select an individual to serve as the Director from among individuals who have substantial expertise in matters relating to the intelligence community, including foreign intelligence and counterintelligence.

#### (d) Duties

(1) Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary, the Director shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Secretary may prescribe.

(2) The Director shall be responsible for establishing policy for intelligence and counterintelligence programs and activities at the Department.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title II, §215, as added Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3204(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 955; amended Pub. L. 109–364, div. C, title XXXI, §3117(f), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2508; Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXIV, §6421(a), Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2199.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to establishment, director, duties, and annual reports of the Office of Counterintelligence.

2006—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–364 substituted "who shall be an employee in the Senior Executive Service, the Senior Intelligence Service, the Senior National Intelligence Service, or any other Service that the Secretary, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence, considers appropriate" for "which shall be a position in the Senior Executive Service".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 5, 1999, see section 3299 of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 2401 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
#### Oliver V. Nenno, Appellant, v. Walrath-Stevens Company and Others, Respondents.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs upon stipulation filed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2733 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2733

  To prohibit the closure or adverse realignment of facilities of the 
 reserve components that the Secretary of Homeland Security determines 
              have a significant role in homeland defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

Ms. Slaughter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the closure or adverse realignment of facilities of the 
 reserve components that the Secretary of Homeland Security determines 
              have a significant role in homeland defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CLOSURE OR ADVERSE REALIGNMENT OF GUARD AND 
              RESERVE FACILITIES HAVING A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN HOMELAND 
              DEFENSE.

    (a) Report on Facilities With Significant Role in Homeland 
Defense.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall review the list of 
military installations recommended for closure or realignment by the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission in the report 
transmitted to Congress by the President pursuant to section 2914(e) of 
the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title 
XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and prepare a report 
specifying each armory, readiness center, and other facility used for 
the development, training, operation, or maintenance of the reserve 
components of the Armed Forces that, while identified for closure or 
adverse realignment on such list, has a significant role in homeland 
defense.
    (b) Submission of Report.--The Secretary of Homeland Security shall 
complete the review required by subsection (a) and submit the report to 
Congress not later than one year after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (c) Prohibition on Closure or Realignment.--Notwithstanding section 
2904 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of 
title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note), the Secretary 
of Defense may not close or realign any armory, readiness center, or 
other facility of the reserve components identified in the report 
prepared under subsection (a) as an armory, readiness center, or other 
facility of the reserve components that has a significant role in 
homeland defense.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``armory'', 
``facility'', and ``readiness center'' have the meaning given those 
terms in section 18232 of title 10, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1007.10 Eligible borrowers. A loan guaranteed under this part may only be made to the following borrowers: ( a ) A Native Hawaiian family;
( b ) The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands;
( c ) The Office of Hawaiian Affairs; or
( d ) A private, nonprofit organization experienced in the planning and development of affordable housing for Native Hawaiians.
### §7611. Records and audit

#### (a) Recipients of assistance to keep prescribed records

Each recipient of assistance under this chapter shall keep such records as the Administrator shall prescribe, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by such recipient of the proceeds of such assistance, the total cost of the project or undertaking in connection with which such assistance is given or used, and the amount of that portion of the cost of the project or undertaking supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

#### (b) Audits

The Administrator and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of audit and examinations to any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipients that are pertinent to the grants received under this chapter.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §311, formerly §11, as added Pub. L. 88–206, §1, Dec. 17, 1963, 77 Stat. 401; renumbered §304, Pub. L. 89–272, title I, §101(4), Oct. 20, 1965, 79 Stat. 992; amended Pub. L. 90–148, §2, Nov. 21, 1967, 81 Stat. 505; renumbered §311 and amended Pub. L. 91–604, §§12(a), 15(c)(2), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1705, 1713.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1857j of this title.

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–604, §15(c)(2), substituted "Administrator" for "Secretary" and "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare".

1967—Pub. L. 90–148 reenacted section without change.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Modification or Rescission of Rules, Regulations, Orders, Determinations, Contracts, Certifications, Authorizations, Delegations, and Other Actions

All rules, regulations, orders, determinations, contracts, certifications, authorizations, delegations, or other actions duly issued, made, or taken by or pursuant to act July 14, 1955, the Clean Air Act, as in effect immediately prior to the date of enactment of Pub. L. 95–95 [Aug. 7, 1977] to continue in full force and effect until modified or rescinded in accordance with act July 14, 1955, as amended by Pub. L. 95–95 [this chapter], see section 406(b) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.
### §7427. Public notification

#### (a) Warning signs; television, radio, or press notices or information

Each State plan shall contain measures which will be effective to notify the public during any calendar 1 on a regular basis of instances or areas in which any national primary ambient air quality standard is exceeded or was exceeded during any portion of the preceding calendar year to advise the public of the health hazards associated with such pollution, and to enhance public awareness of the measures which can be taken to prevent such standards from being exceeded and the ways in which the public can participate in regulatory and other efforts to improve air quality. Such measures may include the posting of warning signs on interstate highway access points to metropolitan areas or television, radio, or press notices or information.

#### (b) Grants

The Administrator is authorized to make grants to States to assist in carrying out the requirements of subsection (a).

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §127, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §124, Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 725.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 7, 1977, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 406(d) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "calendar year".
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES STEVENS,

Petitioner,

 v.

RON DAVIS, Warden, San Quentin

State Prison

Respondent.

/

No. C 09-137 WHA

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER GRANTING 21-DAY

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH

TO FILE A REPLY

Petitioner submitted a motion for an extension of time in which to file a reply to

respondent’s Answer to petitioner’s first round of merits briefing. Good cause appearing, any

such reply is due on or before July 20, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 18, 2015. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00137-WHA Document 125 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 1