alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN’S AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE 

OF A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5458, 

THE “VETERANS TRICARE CHOICE ACT” 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 5458 changes the short 

title of the bill to the “Veterans TRICARE Choice Act of 2016.” 

The following presents the estimated Federal fiscal year budget effects of the Chairman’s 

amendment [1]. 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26

 

-1 -8 -9 -9 -10 -11 -11 -12 -13 -13 -37 -97

 [1] Estimate includes the following off-budget effects: 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26

 

-1 -3 -4 -4 -4 -5 -5 -5 -5 -6 -16 -41

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

June 14, 2016 

JCX-50-16
### §5134. Interagency task force

#### (a) In general

The President shall establish a Federal interagency task force for the purpose of coordinating the implementation of predisaster hazard mitigation programs administered by the Federal Government.

#### (b) Chairperson

The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall serve as the chairperson of the task force.

#### (c) Membership

The membership of the task force shall include representatives of—

(1) relevant Federal agencies;

(2) State and local government organizations (including Indian tribes); and

(3) the American Red Cross.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title II, §204, as added Pub. L. 106–390, title I, §103, Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1557; amended Pub. L. 111–351, §3(c)(2), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3864.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–351 substituted "Administrator" for "Director".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
exv10w4











Exhibit 10.4




Description of Fiscal 2011 Bonus Arrangement by and between the Company and Kimberly
Till



     On
November 4, 2010, the Compensation Committee and Independent Directors approved performance
metrics for fiscal 2011 applicable to the $600,000 target incentive bonus to which Kimberly Till,
President and Chief Executive Officer, is contractually entitled if the metrics are achieved. 64%
of Ms. Till’s bonus will be based upon achievement of fiscal 2011 operating income, measured and
payable as provided in the Company’s fiscal 2011 Corporate Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”). The
remainder of her bonus will be paid upon achievement of three management objectives, with the
degree of achievement to be determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Each
management objective, if fully achieved, would result in a payout of
up to 12% of Ms. Till’s target
bonus, subject to the Company’s attainment of threshold financial performance in accordance with
the Bonus Plan. The management objectives relate to (i) building client relationships, sales, and
revenue, (ii) further developing and commercializing innovative
products and
(iii) continuing to strengthen the effectiveness of the senior management team.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JULIAN RICARDO CHACON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10393

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00059-JCMGWF-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 14, 2010

San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Julian Ricardo Chacon appeals the denial of a motion to suppress evidence

in his criminal trial in federal district court. We affirm the district court.

FILED

AUG 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Applying de novo review, we agree with the district court that the reasonable

suspicion underlying the investigatory stop had not dissipated at the time Chacon

gave consent to the search of his vehicle. As a result, the fact that Chacon was in

custody at the time he gave consent did not taint his consent. Although reasonable

suspicion may have begun to dissipate regarding the possibility of a kidnap-inprogress, the highly unusual circumstances and odd explanations known to the

police at the time of consent did not eliminate reasonable suspicion that some

“criminal activity may be afoot.” United States v. Berber-Tinoco, 510 F.3d 1083,

1087 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal quotations omitted); see also United States v. Lopez,

482 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2007).

The district court did not commit clear error in finding Chacon’s consent to

be voluntary. Several factors in the totality of the circumstances analysis support

the district court’s conclusion. See United States v. Patayan Soriano, 361 F.3d

494, 501-04 (9th Cir. 2004).

AFFIRMED.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2007\5634\Order re March 12 hearing.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE TRANSPACIFIC PASSENGER AIRTRANSPORTATION ANTITRUSTLITIGATION                                                                      /

This document relates to: ALL ACTIONS                                                                      /

No. C 07-05634 CRB

MDL 1913

ORDER

The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss will be held in abeyance pending a

determination of the applicability of the Bankruptcy Court’s injunction to these proceedings. 

The merits of those motions will therefore not be the subject of the hearing scheduled for

March 12, 2010.  Instead, the parties should be prepared to discuss the merits of Defendants’

Motion To Stay Proceedings Upon Notice of Injunction in In Re: Japan Airlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 3, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01912-CRB   Document 3   Filed 03/03/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2021-04-09T05:29:47-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
§ 224.23 Subpoenas for attendance at hearing. ( a ) A party wishing to procure the appearance and testimony of any individual at the hearing may request that the ALJ issue a subpoena.
( b ) A subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of an individual may also require the individual to produce documents at the hearing.
( c ) A party seeking a subpoena shall file a written request therefore not less than 15 days before the date fixed for the hearing unless otherwise allowed by the ALJ for good cause shown. Such request shall specify any documents to be produced and shall designate the witnesses and describe the address and location thereof with sufficient particularity to permit such witnesses to be found.
( d ) The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the witness is to appear and any documents the witness is to produce.
( e ) The party seeking the subpoena shall serve it in the manner prescribed in § 224.8. A subpoena on a party or upon an individual under the control of a party may be served by first-class mail.
( f ) A party or individual to whom the subpoena is directed may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena within ten days after service or on or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance if it is less than ten days after service.
### §3796ii–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ii–8 was editorially reclassified as section 10479 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 121.2 Furnishing of data by program participants.

Participants in the programs administered by the Department shall furnish to the Department such data concerning the race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, and family characteristics of persons and households who are applicants for, participants in, or beneficiaries or potential beneficiaries of, those programs as the Secretary may determine to be necessary or appropriate to enable him or her to carry out his or her responsibilities under the authorities referred to in § 121.1.
Third Department,

April, 1977

(April 1, 1977)

#### In the Matter of Jeanette P. Strongin, Appellant, v Ewald B. Nyquist, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Motion for clarification of decision dated November 10, 1976 (54 AD2d 1031) granted, without costs, and decretal paragraph of decision amended to read as follows: "Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by annulling so much of the determination as found petitioner guilty of charge II and by reducing the penalty to a suspension of six months without pay, and matter remitted to Special Term for a determination, under relevant rules, of the amount petitioner is to be paid in back salary from the date of her suspension to the date of reinstatement, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.” The issues raised by respondents on this motion regarding petitioner’s obligation to minimize her damages and her alleged delay in prosecuting the appeal should also be presented to and determined by Special Term upon the remittitur. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Larkin, JJ., concur.
§ 115.205 Certification procedures. ( a ) *Certification.* ( 1 ) If the Assistant Secretary determines, after application of criteria set forth in §§ 115.204, 115.206, and this section, that the state or local law, both “on its face” and “in operation,” provides substantive rights, procedures, remedies, and judicial review procedures for alleged discriminatory housing practices that are substantially equivalent to those provided in the Act, the Assistant Secretary may enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the agency.
( 2 ) The MOU is a written agreement providing for the referral of complaints to the agency and for communication procedures between the agency and HUD that are adequate to permit the Assistant Secretary to monitor the agency's continuing substantial equivalency certification.
( 3 ) The MOU, after it is signed by all appropriate signatories, may authorize an agency to be a certified agency for a period of not more than five years. Appropriate signatories include the Assistant Secretary, the FHEO regional director, and the authorized employee(s) of the agency.
( b ) In order to receive certification, during the 60 days prior to the expiration of the agency's interim agreement, the agency must certify to the Assistant Secretary that the state or local fair housing law, “on its face,” continues to be substantially equivalent to the Act (i.e., there have been no amendments to the state or local fair housing law, adoption of rules or procedures concerning the fair housing law, or judicial or other authoritative interpretations of the fair housing law that limit the effectiveness of the agency's fair housing law).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.8

                                                Confidential Treatment Requested

(QUATRX LOGO)

QUATRx Pharmaceuticals Company
Chris I. Nicholas
5430 Data Court, Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48108
(734) 9134900 * fax (134) 913.0743
www.quatrx.com - email cnicholas@quartx.com

CONFIDENTIAL

November 8, 2004

Deltanoid Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
645 Science Drive,
Madison, Wisconsin, 53711

     RE: Deltanoid-QuatRx Agreement

Dear Linda

As you know, over the past several months, we have discussed potential
amendments and updates to the Exclusive License Agreement between Deltanoid
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and QuatRx Pharmaceuticals Company dated November 7, 2001
(the "Deltanoid-QuatRx License"). While we have discussed making certain changes
in the future, we at QuatRx would appreciate implementing 2 important agreed
changes at this time as follows:

1) Amend the Deltanoid-QuatRx License to include the following patent filings
(and their patent progeny as spelled out in the intellectual property
definitions in the existing agreements) within the "Licensed Patents" under each
of these agreements: US Patent Serial Number **** and US publication
numbers **** and ****.

2) Amend the Deltanoid-QuatRx License to provide that QuatRx shall have the
right to exercise Deltanoid's rights under Section 10 of the Deltainoid License
Agreement between Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and Deltanoid
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated April 7, 2000 ("WARF-Deltanoid License") with
respect to infringement that would be competitive with any product licensed to
QuatRx in the field of use set forth in the Deltanoid-QuatRx License.

The consideration for these amendments is that QuatRx will pay the royalties on
the basis of the patent filings coverage as specified in the current
Deltanoid-QuatRx License, as if these patent filings had originally been
included among the Licensed Patents under that agreement, and other good and
valuable consideration in the form of QuatRx's ongoing efforts and investment
with respect to the vitamin D analog product candidate that it is developing.

To indicate that Deltanoid agrees to these amendments (with all of the
agreements listed above otherwise remaining in full force and effect), please
let me know by email and then print and

<PAGE>

return to me a copy of this note signed by an authorized representative of your
organization. I will also send you an original signature on behalf of QuatRx for
your records.

We at QuatRx value highly our ongoing positive relationship with you and thank
you for prompt assistance with this mater.

Yours sincerely,


/s/ C. Nicholas
-------------------------------------


Accepted and agreed:

Deltanoid Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


By: /s/ Hector F. DeLuca
    ---------------------------------
Name: Hector F. DeLuca
Title: President & CEO Deltanoid
       Pharmaceuticals

Date: 11/10/04


                                        2
### §3796gg–8. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796gg–8 was editorially reclassified as section 10451 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Jan 1 - Mar 24, 11

Ordinary Income/Expense

Income

Charter Sales

[N673YS] 258,707.91

NXXXXX 10,849.80

Charter Sales - Other -47,287.20

Total Charter Sales 222,270.51

Maintenance Sales

Parts 3,495.29

Total Maintenance Sales 3,495.29

Management Fees 56,600.02

Reimbursable Expenses

Flight Training 2,633.21

Reimbursable Expenses - Other 191.18

Total Reimbursable Expenses 2,824.39

Total Income 285,190.21

Cost of Goods Sold

50000 · Flight Expenses

Aircraft Services 3,967.68

Airport Fees 4,962.20

Cabin Supplies 430.53

Catering 456.12

Contract Pilot 22,293.78

Fuel and Oil 72,053.35

PAX Transportation 201.91

Total 50000 · Flight Expenses 104,365.57

50500 · Crew Expense

Airline Travel 2,541.50

Ground Transportation 1,723.72

Lodging 7,712.72

Meals 604.15

Total 50500 · Crew Expense 12,582.09

51000 · Maintenance

Freight 268.40

S/N 1073 Aircraft Parts 5,833.75

Total 51000 · Maintenance 6,102.15

52000 · Business Travel Expense

Air Travel 3,439.29

Grnd Transportation 748.64

Lodgings 211.68

Meal 432.01

Total 52000 · Business Travel Expense 4,831.62

54000 · Subscriptions & DB Fees 1,833.66

54500 · Flight Training 1,005.00

55000 · Employee Benefits

Health Insurance 797.00

Uniform 0.00

Total 55000 · Employee Benefits 797.00

56000 · Fees 1,506.09

59000 · OWNER REV

Owner Rev 1073 20,796.00

Total 59000 · OWNER REV 20,796.00

Total COGS 153,819.18

Gross Profit 131,371.03

JET-A

03/24/11 Profit & Loss

Accrual Basis January 1 through March 24, 2011

Page 1
Jan 1 - Mar 24, 11

Expense

Discount Received -1,579.12

Executive Draw 3,400.00

Tax 115.51

60000 · Administrative Expenses

60500 · Salaries

3557 24,999.99

Total 60500 · Salaries 24,999.99

61500 · Flt Ops - Office Supplies 143.36

62000 · Advertising -106.78

64000 · I.T. and Communications 1,866.19

69000 · Miscellaneous 31,400.00

69500 · Bank Fees 791.08

Total 60000 · Administrative Expenses 59,093.84

Total Expense 61,030.23

Net Ordinary Income 70,340.80

Net Income 70,340.80

JET-A

03/24/11 Profit & Loss

Accrual Basis January 1 through March 24, 2011

Page 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2582 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ortho nitro aniline. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ortho nitro aniline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ORTHO NITRO ANILINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following: 

‘‘ 9902.34.24 2-Nitroaniline (CAS No. 88– 

74–4) (provided for in subheading 2921.42.90) ............ Free No Change No Change On or Before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2582 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §4346. Tenure and compensation of members

Members of the Council shall serve full time and the Chairman of the Council shall be compensated at the rate provided for Level II of the Executive Schedule Pay Rates (5 U.S.C. 5313). The other members of the Council shall be compensated at the rate provided for Level IV or 1 the Executive Schedule Pay Rates (5 U.S.C. 5315).

(Pub. L. 91–190, title II, §206, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 856.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "of".
** **

** **

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital l Trust20l9-L3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2019-L3 (the"Trust")

 

I, George Wisniewski, an ExecutiveManaging Director of Situs Holdings, LLC, as ILPT Industrial Portfolio SpecialServicer (the "Certifying Servicer"), certify to MorganStanley Capital I Inc. and each Other Depositor with respect to asecuritization of a Serviced Companion Loan and their respective officers,directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will relyupon this certification, that:

 

1.      I (or Servicing Officers under mysupervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer's activities during the 2019calendar year between November l, 2019 and December 31, 2019 (the "ReportingPeriod") and the Certifying Servicer's performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement; and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under thePooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the ReportingPeriod.

 

 

Date: February 20, 2020

 

SITUS HOLDINGS, LLC,

as ILPT Industrial PortfolioSpecial Servicer

 

By: /s/ George Wisniewski

 

Name:    George Wisniewski

Title:      Executive Managing Director
#### Waters *v.*Waters.

October 17, 1912.

Temporary alimony. Before Judge Jones. Hall superior court. May 20, 1912.

*J. G. Collins,*for plaintiff in error. *W. M. Johnson,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. If pending an action for temporary and permanent alimony the court refuses temporary alimony, the applicant may again apply for temporary alimony pending the action for permanent alimony; and such supplemental application for temporary alimony may be made a part of the original suit by amendment.

2. A judgment refusing or granting temporary alimony is subject to revision, by the court at any time..

3. Where it appears that the circumstances existing at the second application for temporary alimony are different from those prevailing when the first application was refused, it is no abuse of discretion to allow reasonable alimony.

4. Even if the testimony objected to was inadmissible, its reception worked no hurt to the complaining party.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Donald D’Avolio, as Administrator C. T. A. of the Estate of Agatha D’Avolio, Deceased, Appellant, v Huberto W. Prado et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[715 NYS2d 681]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Same Memorandum as in *D’Avolio v Prado*([appeal No. 2] 277 AD2d 877 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara *880County, Joslin, J. — Amend Pleading.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.