alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DanielA. Coccoluto, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Daniel A. Coccoluto        |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel A. Coccoluto            |
| Acting Chief Financial Officer |
| November 15, 2004         |

 

----
#### § 115.301 Agency eligibility criteria; Funding availability.

An agency with certification or interim certification under subpart B of this part, and which has entered into a MOU or interim agreement, is eligible to participate in the FHAP. All FHAP funding is subject to congressional appropriation.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Case No. 3:08-cv-05783 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 

STEVEN J. JOHNSON, SBN 121568 

MICHAEL B. SMITH, SBN 235764 

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

1881 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, California 94304 

Telephone: (650) 849-5300 

Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 

sjjohnson@gibsondunn.com 

msmith@gibsondunn.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SANTA CRUZ SURFING CLUB 

PRESERVATION SOCIETY and

HARRY MAYO 

JAMES M. CHADWICK, SBN 157114 

THAYER M. PREECE, SBN 241824 

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

990 Marsh Road 

Menlo Park, California 94025 

Telephone: (650) 815-2600 

Facsimile: (650) 815-2601 

jchadwick@sheppardmullin.com 

tpreece@sheppardmullin.com 

Attorneys for Defendants 

RYAN RITTENHOUSE and 

SANTA CRUZ SURFING CLUB, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SANTA CRUZ SURFING CLUB 

PRESERVATION SOCIETY, a California 

nonprofit public benefit corporation; and 

HARRY MAYO, an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

RYAN RITTENHOUSE, an individual; and 

SANTA CRUZ SURFING CLUB, INC., a 

California corporation,

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-05783-SI 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. 

R. CIV. PROC. 41(a)

Date Filed: December 30, 2008 

Trial Date: To be determined 

Case 3:08-cv-05783-SI Document 49 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Case No. 3:08-cv-05783 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn & 

Crutcher LLP 2

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiffs Santa Cruz Surfing 

Club Preservation Society and Harry Mayo on the one hand, and Defendants Ryan Rittenhouse and 

Santa Cruz Surfing Club, Inc. on the other hand, by and through their respective attorneys of record, 

hereby stipulate to the dismissal of the within action in its entirety, with prejudice, with each of the 

parties to bear his or its respective costs. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April 30, 2010 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 

By: ____________/s/_________________________

Michael B. Smith 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

SANTA CRUZ SURFING CLUB PRESERVATION 

SOCIETY and HARRY MAYO 

Dated: April 30, 2010 SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 

By: ____________/s/__________________________

James M. Chadwick 

Attorneys for Defendants 

RYAN RITTENHOUSE and 

SANTA CRUZ SURFING CLUB, INC. 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: _________________________ 

Hon. Susan Illston 

U.S. District Court Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-05783-SI Document 49 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Peter Immordino, appellee, v. Chicago Railways Company et al., operating as Chicago Surface Lines, appellants.

Gen. No. 26,063.

Action on the ease for personal injuries by collision between street ear and plaintiff’s automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1922.

Reversed with finding of fact.

Opinion filed May 28, 1923.

Charles LeRoy Brown, for appellants; John R. Guilliams, John E. Kehoe and Frank L. Hriete, of counsel. Albert N. Powell and Charles C. Spencer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §6304. Injunctive enforcement

The United States district courts shall have jurisdiction to restrain (1) any violation of section 6302 of this title and (2) any person from distributing in commerce any covered product which does not comply with an applicable rule under section 6294 or 6295 of this title. Any such action shall be brought by the Commission, except that any such action to restrain any violation of section 6302(a)(3) of this title which relates to requirements prescribed by the Secretary, any violation of section 6302(a)(4) of this title which relates to requests of the Secretary under section 6296(b)(2) of this title, or any violation of paragraph (5), (6), (7), or (8) of section 6302(a) of this title shall be brought by the Secretary. Any such action to restrain any person from distributing in commerce a general service incandescent lamp that does not comply with the applicable standard established under section 6295(i) of this title or an adapter prohibited under section 6302(a)(7) of this title may also be brought by the attorney general of a State in the name of the State. Any such action may be brought in any United States district court for a district wherein any act, omission, or transaction constituting the violation occurred, or in such court for the district wherein the defendant is found or transacts business. In any action under this section, process may be served on a defendant in any other district in which the defendant resides or may be found.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §334, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288; Pub. L. 110–140, title III, §321(f), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1586; Pub. L. 114–11, title II, §201(4), Apr. 30, 2015, 129 Stat. 189.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–11 substituted "paragraph (5), (6), (7), or (8) of section 6302(a)" for "section 6302(a)(5)" and "section 6302(a)(7)" for "section 6302(a)(6)".

2007—Pub. L. 110–140 inserted after second sentence "Any such action to restrain any person from distributing in commerce a general service incandescent lamp that does not comply with the applicable standard established under section 6295(i) of this title or an adapter prohibited under section 6302(a)(6) of this title may also be brought by the attorney general of a State in the name of the State."

1978—Pub. L. 95–619 substituted "Secretary" for "Administrator", meaning Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration, wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2007 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110–140 effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Exhibit 3.1(b)
 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 ARCONIC ROLLED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
 
 ARCONIC ROLLED PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the “ Corporation ”), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (as amended, the “ DGCL ”), does hereby certify as follows:
 1. The Original Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed on August 14, 2019 (the “ Certificate ”).
 2. This First Amendment to the Certificate was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL.
 3. The Certificate is hereby amended as follows:
 Section FOUR is hereby deleted and restated in its entirety to read:
 “The total number of authorized shares of capital stock of the corporation shall be 160,000,000 shares which shall be divided into two classes as follows:  (i) 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
 Effective as of 6:00 p.m., Eastern time (the “ Effective Time ”), on the date set as the record date (the “ Record Date ”) for the distribution of Common Stock to be paid to holders of common stock, par value $1.00 per share (“ Parent Common Stock ”), of Arconic Inc. (“ Parent ”), of one (1) share of Common Stock for every four (4) shares of Parent Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date (such distribution ratio of Common Stock to Parent Common Stock, the “ Distribution Ratio ”), the one thousand (1,000) shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, automatically by operation of law and without any further action on the part of the corporation or any holders of shares of capital stock of the corporation, each be subdivided and converted into a number of shares of validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance pursuant to this certificate of incorporation equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (a) the product of (i) the number of shares of Parent Common Stock, issued and outstanding as of the Effective Time, multiplied by (ii) the Distribution Ratio, by (b) one thousand (1,000).”
 4. This First Amendment to the Certificate shall be effective upon the filing hereof.
 
 [ Signature Page to First Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation ]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2713 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2713

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 4-[[3-
     (acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10-d ioxo-, 
                            monosodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 4-[[3-
     (acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10-d ioxo-, 
                            monosodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-ANTHRACENESULFONIC ACID, 4-[[3-(ACETYLAMINO)PHENYL]AMINO]-
              1-AMINO-9,10-DIHYDRO-9,10-DIOXO-, MONOSODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.12.18      2-                  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Anthracenesulfoni                                                  31/2008
                         c acid, 4-[[3-
                         (acetylamino)phen
                         yl]amino]-1-amino-
                         9,10-dihydro-9,10-
                         dioxo-,
                         monosodium salt
                         (CAS No. 70571-81-
                         2) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3204.12.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28107]



[[Page 76963]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee Open Committee 
Meetings

    According to the provisions of section 10 of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that meetings of 
the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee will be held on--

    Thursday, January 13, 2005,
    Thursday, January 27, 2005,
    Thursday, February 10, 2005, and
    Thursday, February 24, 2005

    The meetings will start at 10 a.m. and will be held in Room 5A06A, 
Office of Personnel Management Building, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee is composed of a 
Chair, five representatives from labor unions holding exclusive 
bargaining rights for Federal blue-collar employees, and five 
representatives from Federal agencies. Entitlement to membership on the 
Committee is provided for in 5 U.S.C. 5347.
    The Committee's primary responsibility is to review the Prevailing 
Rate System and other matters pertinent to establishing prevailing 
rates under subchapter IV, chapter 53, 5 U.S.C., as amended, and from 
time to time advise the Office of Personnel Management.
    These scheduled meetings will start in open session with both labor 
and management representatives attending. During the meetings either 
the labor members or the management members may caucus separately with 
the Chair to devise strategy and formulate positions. Premature 
disclosure of the matters discussed in these caucuses would 
unacceptably impair the ability of the Committee to reach a consensus 
on the matters being considered and would disrupt substantially the 
disposition of its business. Therefore, these caucuses will be closed 
to the public because of a determination made by the Director of the 
Office of Personnel Management under the provisions of section 10(d) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B). These caucuses may, depending on the issues involved, 
constitute a substantial portion of a meeting.
    Annually, the Chair compiles a report of pay issues discussed and 
concluded recommendations. These reports are available to the public, 
upon written request to the Committee's Secretary.
    The public is invited to submit material in writing to the Chair on 
Federal Wage System pay matters felt to be deserving of the Committee's 
attention. Additional information on these meetings may be obtained by 
contacting the Committee's Secretary, Office of Personnel Management, 
Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, Room 5538, 1900 E Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-1500.

    Dated: December 16, 2004.
Mary M. Rose,
Chairperson, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 04-28107 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-49-P
Exhibit 32

Certification

Each of the undersigned officers of Allin Corporation (the Company), certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                  | 
|November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Dean C. Praskach   
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VIRGINIA ROBERSON,

Defendant. /

No. CR 09-0523 WHA

ORDER SETTING

TRIAL SCHEDULE

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the following schedule is hereby set in this action:

Further motions by defendant shall be filed on or before NOON ON MARCH 9, 2010.

Responses from the United States shall be due on or before NOON ON MARCH 30, 2010, and

replies shall be due on or before NOON ON APRIL 6, 2010. A hearing on the motions shall be

held on APRIL 13, 2010, AT 2:00 P.M.

A final pretrial conference shall be held on MAY 3, 2010, AT 2:00 P.M. The trial shall

begin on MAY 17, 2010, AT 7:30 A.M.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cr-00523-WHA Document 79 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 271

To convey certain submerged lands to the Government of the Virgin Islands, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To convey certain submerged lands to the Government of 

the Virgin Islands, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF SUBMERGED LANDS TO THE 

4 GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

6 all of the right, title, and interest of the United States 

7 in and to submerged lands in the area between the island 

8 of Saint Croix and the islands of Saint Thomas and Saint 

9 John is conveyed to the Government of the Virgin Islands 
2

•HR 271 IH 

1 to be administered in trust for the benefit of the people 

2 thereof. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

4 (1) AREA BETWEEN THE ISLAND OF SAINT

5 CROIX AND THE ISLANDS OF SAINT THOMAS AND

6 SAINT JOHN.—The term ‘‘area between the island of 

7 Saint Croix and the islands of Saint Thomas and 

8 Saint John’’ means the area that is—

9 (A) outside of the area conveyed to the 

10 Virgin Islands by section 1 of Public Law 93–

11 435 (48 U.S.C. 1705); 

12 (B) north of Saint Croix; 

13 (C) south of Saint Thomas and Saint 

14 John; 

15 (D) east of the line running from the west16 ernmost point on the coastline of Saint Croix at 

17 mean high tide to the westernmost point on the 

18 coastline of Saint Thomas at mean high tide; 

19 and 

20 (E) west of the line running from the east21 ernmost point on the coastline of Saint Croix at 

22 mean high tide to the easternmost point on the 

23 coastline of Saint John at mean high tide. 

24 (2) SAINT CROIX, SAINT THOMAS, SAINT

25 JOHN.—The terms ‘‘Saint Croix’’, ‘‘Saint Thomas’’, 
3

•HR 271 IH 

1 and ‘‘Saint John’’ mean the islands of Saint Croix, 

2 Saint Thomas, and Saint John, respectively, in the 

3 United States Virgin Islands. 

4 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF TERRITORIAL WATERS OF THE 

5 VIRGIN WATERS. 

6 For purposes of the laws of the United States, and 

7 except as otherwise provided by international law or any 

8 international agreement in force for the United States, the 

9 territorial waters of the United States Virgin Islands shall 

10 consist of all waters in the belt of the seas measured from 

11 the line of ordinary low water along that portion of the 

12 coast which is in direct contact with the open sea and the 

13 line marking the seaward limit of inland waters, and ex14 tending seaward a distance of 9 miles.

Æ
AFS

- 12

- 356

- E

June 11, 2012 Exemption No. 9510A Regulatory

Docket No

. FAA

- 2007

- 28247 Mr. Randolph Shields Director, Safety

and Certification Hawker Beechcraft Corporation 105 11 E Central Avenue Wichita, KS 67206 Dear Mr. Shields: This letter is to inform y ou that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9510. Itexplains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and limitations , including the date it ends. **The Basis for Our Decision** By letter dated March 6, 2012, y ou petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (HBC) for an extension of Exemption No. 9510. That exemption from § 47.65(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits HBC to use its Dealer’s Aircraft Registration Certificate to conduct flights outside the United States for flight testing, sales demonstrations, and marketing its products. Iny our petit ion, y ou indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to HBC. **Our Decision** The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9510 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I

grant y our petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. **Conditions and Limitations** 1. HBC must own the aircraft; 2. The aircraft must have a temporary registration number or an assigned registration number affixed as required by 14 CFR part 45; 3. HBC shall maintain records of each international flight for one y ear after the aircraft returns to the United States, such records to consist of: a. Registration number and manufacturer’s serial number; b. Dates of departure and return to the United States; and, c. General overseas itinerary

. **The Effect of Our Decision** Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9510, as amended, to July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9510, as amended, remain the same. This let ter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9510. Sincerely , /s/ John S. Duncan Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service