alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gioacchino Piccinich, Appellant, v Grace Lines, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant Grace Lines, Inc., in the sum of $201,226.20, entered in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, on February 11, 1977, after trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff was injured on July 16, 1969 as a result of an accident allegedly occasioned by defendant’s negligence. In January, 1977, on the eve of trial, plaintiff moved to increase the *ad damnum*clause from $200,000 to $1,000,-000 upon the claim, "on the basis of newly discovered facts”, that he suffered a psychiatric disability. The motion was supported solely by an affidavit of plaintiff’s daughter and a letter from a psychiatrist who had examined plaintiff just before trial and found him to be "suffering from a Post Traumatic Neurosis with depressive features which seem according to the history to be related to his accident.” Prior applications to increase the *ad damnum*clause on other grounds had been denied and on one occasion such denial was affirmed on appeal. (See *Piccinich v Grace Line, Inc.,*54 AD2d 887, lv to app den 40 NY2d 1092.) In this final application we note that the affidavit of plaintiff’s daughter asserted that plaintiff "has been in a constant state of depression *since*the accident which made him totally disabled” (emphasis added). Throughout the long history of this action there have been six different applications to increase *ad damnum*but the claim of psychiatric difficulties was never advanced. The *application, made on*the eve of trial, without an affidavit from plaintiff and an affidavit from the psychiatrist was properly denied. (See *Osborne v Miller,*38 AD2d 298; *Ferrari v Paramount Plumbing & Heating Co.,*20 AD2d 878; *Koi v P.S. & M. Catering Corp.,*15 AD2d 775.) The fact that the jury returned a verdict for $450,000 provides no basis for overruling the trial court’s reduction of the verdict. A verdict cannot exceed the amount demanded as damages in the complaint. (3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3017.06.) In the circumstances we find that there was no improvident exercise of discretion by the trial court. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Evans and Markewich, JJ.
#### § 1000.225 When may a waiver of the IHP submission deadline be requested?

A recipient may request a waiver for a period of not more than 90 days beyond the IHP submission due date.

[77 FR 71526, Dec. 3, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE TICE
TECHNOLOGY INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         492,007                 492,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,481                 107,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    689,329                 689,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,313,246               1,313,246
<PP&E>                                         793,484                 793,484
<DEPRECIATION>                                 581,453                 581,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,902,205               1,902,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          352,981                 352,981
<BONDS>                                      1,393,302               1,393,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       106,119                 106,119
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,803                  49,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,902,205               1,902,205
<SALES>                                         64,096                 233,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,196                 372,351
<CGS>                                          112,099                 352,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  383,922               1,019,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,951                 100,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (282,586)               (743,297)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,010                  13,868
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (229,726)               (647,218)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (291,596)               (757,165)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)                  (0.09)


</TABLE>
### §4124. Applicability of fiscal controls

The provisions of chapter 91 of title 31 shall apply to the program authorized under this chapter to the same extent as they apply to wholly owned Government corporations.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XIII, §1373, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 589; Pub. L. 98–479, title II, §203(j)(3), Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2231.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to "this title" meaning title XIII of Pub. L. 90–448, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 572, known as the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4001 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–479 substituted "chapter 91 of title 31" for "the Government Corporation Control Act".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 120 days following Aug. 1, 1968, or such later date prescribed by the Secretary but in no event more than 180 days following Aug. 1, 1968, see section 1377 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as a note under section 4001 of this title.
### §620. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–288, §6(a), Sept. 28, 2006, 120 Stat. 1244

Section, act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IV, §420, as added Pub. L. 90–248, title II, §240(c), Jan. 2, 1968, 81 Stat. 911; amended Pub. L. 92–603, title IV, §412, Oct. 30, 1972, 86 Stat. 1492; Pub. L. 96–272, title I, §103(a), June 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 516; Pub. L. 98–369, div. B, title VI, §2663(c)(8), July 18, 1984, 98 Stat. 1166; Pub. L. 101–239, title X, §10401(a), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2487, authorized appropriations for child welfare services. See section 625 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2006, and applicable to payments under this part and part E of this subchapter for calendar quarters beginning on or after such date, see section 12(a) of Pub. L. 109–288, set out as an Effective Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 621 of this title.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZIRCON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

THE STANLEY WORKS,

Defendants. 

No. C-09-0042-EDL

JUDGMENT

This action came before the Court, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte presiding, and a

decision having been fully rendered;

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in accordance with the Court’s order of May 14,

2010, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 24, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00042-EDL Document 65 Filed 05/24/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1000.104 What families are eligible for affordable housing activities? The following families are eligible for affordable housing activities: ( a ) Low income Indian families on a reservation or Indian area.
( b ) A non-low-income family may receive housing assistance in accordance with § 1000.110.
( c ) A family may receive housing assistance on a reservation or Indian area if the family's housing needs cannot be reasonably met without such assistance and the recipient determines that the presence of that family on the reservation or Indian area is essential to the well-being of Indian families.
( d ) A recipient may provide housing or housing assistance provided through affordable housing activities assisted with grant amounts under NAHASDA for a law enforcement officer on an Indian reservation or other Indian area, if: ( 1 ) The officer: ( i ) Is employed on a full-time basis by the federal government or a state, county, or other unit of local government, or lawfully recognized tribal government; and
( ii ) In implementing such full-time employment, is sworn to uphold, and make arrests for, violations of federal, state, county, or tribal law; and
( 2 ) The recipient determines that the presence of the law enforcement officer on the Indian reservation or other Indian area may deter crime.
[63 FR 12349, Mar. 12, 1998, as amended at 77 FR 71524, Dec. 3, 2012]
### §7293. Agency terminations

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, whenever all of the functions vested by law in any agency, commission, or other body, or any component thereof, have been terminated or transferred from that agency, commission, or other body, or component by this chapter, the agency, commission, or other body, or component, shall terminate. If an agency, commission, or other body, or any component thereof, terminates pursuant to the preceding sentence, each position and office therein which was expressly authorized by law, or the incumbent of which was authorized to receive compensation at the rates prescribed for an office or position at level II, III, IV, or V of the Executive Schedule (5 U.S.C. 5313–5316), shall terminate.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VII, §703, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 606.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565, known as the Department of Energy Organization Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7101 of this title and Tables.
EXHIBIT 10.25


 


Hittite Microwave Corporation


Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan


 


Directors
who are our employees receive no separate compensation for their services as
directors. Our non-employee directors receive cash fees and equity-based
compensation in the form of awards under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as
follows:


 


·                  each
non-employee director receives an annual cash fee in the amount of $32,000;


·                  our lead
director receives an additional cash fee in the amount of $20,000;


·                  the chairperson
of each of our board committees receives an additional cash fee as follows: audit
committee chair, $20,000; compensation committee chair, $8,000; and nominating
and governance committee chair, $8,000; and


·                  each other
member of a board committee receives an additional annual cash fee of $8,000.


 


The
cash fees described above are paid quarterly in arrears. Non-employee directors
are also reimbursed upon request for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with their attendance at meetings of the board and of
committees on which they serve.


 


In
addition, each non-employee director who is first elected to the board or who
is elected to an additional one-year term at any annual meeting of
stockholders, will upon such election receive a restricted stock award of a
number of shares of our common stock, fixed on the date of grant, that has a
fair value on the date of grant equal to $130,000. Each such restricted stock
award will vest on the earlier of the first anniversary of the date of grant or
the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders, subject to partial
acceleration in the event of a change in control.
#### Janet Filippazzo, Appellant, v Yvonne Santiago, Respondent.

[716 NYS2d 710]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated March 9, 2000, which denied her motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff’s motion is granted.

The defendant admitted during her examination before trial that she did not see the plaintiffs car until she was only three car lengths away, when she could not avoid colliding into the rear of the plaintiffs car.

A rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle creates a prima facie case of liability with respect to the operator of the rearmost vehicle, imposing a duty * of explanation on that operator to excuse the collision either through a mechanical failure, a sudden stop of the vehicle ahead, an unavoidable skidding on a wet pavement, or any other reasonable cause *(see, Power v Hupart,*260 AD2d 458; *Leal v Wolff,*224 AD2d 392; *Barile v Lazzarini,*222 AD2d 635, 636). When a driver of an automobile approaches another automobile from the rear, he or she is bound to maintain a reasonably safe rate of speed and control over his or her vehicle, and to exercise reasonable care to avoid colliding with the other vehicle *(see, Power v Hupart, supra; Abramowicz v Roberto,*220 AD2d 374). In addition, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 (a) requires a driver to maintain a safe distance between vehicles: “The driver of a mo*420tor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicles and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway.” Moreover, “drivers have a ‘duty to see what should be seen and to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances to avoid an accident’ ” *(Johnson v Phillips,*261 AD2d 269, 271, quoting *DeAngelis v Kirschner,*171 AD2d 593).

The defendant failed to come forward with a nonnegligent explanation for the accident. The defendant claims that the brake lights on the plaintiffs vehicle were not functioning and that the plaintiff failed to use her turning signals. However, in light of the defendant’s admission that she did not see the plaintiffs vehicle until she was only three car lengths away, she failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the malfunctioning brake lights and the plaintiffs failure to use her turning signals were a proximate cause of the accident. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Case 3:09-cr-01166-SI Document 16 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:09-cr-01166-SI Document 16 Filed 02/11/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) of TriplePoint Private Venture Credit Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christopher M. Mathieu, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ Christopher M. MathieuName:Christopher M. MathieuDate:March 8, 2022
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Benchmark 2019-B15 Mortgage Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 30, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)

Benchmark 2019-B15 Certifications

---
Case 3:08-cv-05635-CRB   Document 14   Filed 04/08/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:08-cv-05635-CRB   Document 14   Filed 04/08/10   Page 2 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-04724-JL Document 41 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04724-JL Document40 Filed01/14/10 Page1 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-04724-JL Document 41 Filed 01/15/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04724-JL Document40 Filed01/14/10 Page2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         966,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,027,422
<PP&E>                                      33,415,496
<DEPRECIATION>                               (382,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,909,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          128,107
<BONDS>                                      9,651,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,130,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,909,892
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,611,026
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  369,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             529,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,711,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,711,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,711,614
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 1413.7 Transcripts, recordings or minutes of closed meeting; public availability; retention. ( a ) For every meeting, or portion thereof, closed under the provisions of § 1413.4, the presiding officer shall prepare a statement setting forth the time and place of the meeting and the persons present, which statement shall be retained by the agency. For each such meeting, or portion thereof, there shall also be maintained a complete transcript or electronic recording of the proceedings, except that for meetings closed pursuant to § 1413.4(a), the Board may, in lieu of a transcript or electronic recording, maintain a set of minutes fully and accurately summarizing any action taken, the reasons therefor and views thereon, documents considered and the members' vote on each roll-call vote.
( b ) The agency shall make promptly available to the public copies of transcripts, recordings or minutes maintained as provided in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, except to the extent the items therein contain information which the agency determines may be withheld pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c). Copies of transcripts or minutes, or transcriptions of electronic recordings including the indentification of speakers, shall to the extent determined to be publicly available, be furnished to any person, subject to the payment of duplication costs in accordance with the schedule of fees set forth in § 1411.10 of this subchapter and the actual cost of transcription.
( c ) The agency shall maintain a complete verbatim copy of the transcript, a complete copy of the minutes, or a complete electronic recording of each meeting, or portion of a meeting, closed to the public, for a period of at least two (2) years after such meeting or until one (1) year after the conclusion of any agency proceeding with respect to which the meeting or portion was held whichever occurs later.