alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2615

To suspend temporarily the duty on Permethrin Technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Permethrin Technical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMETHRIN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.90.21 Permethrin Technical - (3-

phenoxyphenyl) methyl(+/-

)cis/trans-3-(2,2-dichloro 

vinyl)–2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS No. 52645–53–

1) (provided for in subheading 2916.20.50) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2615 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Robert P. Pinkas, Chief Executive Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Brantley CapitalCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Dated this 15th day of November 2004.      By: */S/ ROBERT P. PINKAS*       *Robert P. Pinkas*   *Chief Executive Officer*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [FEMA-1551-DR]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1551-DR), dated September 16, 2004, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Dates:*                         December 9, 2004.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of September 16, 2004: 

The counties of Brevard, Clay, Duval, Flagler, Highlands, Indian River, Lake, Manatee, Marion, Martin, Okeechobee, Osceola, Orange, Palm Beach, Pasco, Polk, Seminole, St. Johns, St. Lucie, and Volusia for Individual Assistance.

The counties of Citrus and Lee for Individual Assistance (already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B] under the Public Assistance Program.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050, Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

Michael D. Brown,

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 04-27623 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hattie Minniefield,

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 7, 1976, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By order dated May 16, 1977, this case was remitted to Criminal Term to hear and report on whether defendant-appellant, prior to entering her plea of guilty, had been advised by her trial attorney of the possibility of an "agency” defense (see *People v Harris,*54 AD2d 946) and the appeal has been held in abeyance in the interim *(People v Minnieñeld,*— AD2d -). At the hearing held in Criminal Term the defendant stated that she had been informed of the "agency” defense by counsel prior to entering the guilty plea. Defendant also stated that she wanted her appeal withdrawn and this was stipulated to by counsel on the record. Accordingly, the appeal is deemed withdrawn. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Motion granted, Appeal dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 5, 

2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00392-CV

JOHNNA HARRISON, Appellant

V.

SYED NAQVI AND SYED ANWAR, Appellees

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-13841

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed April 11, 2023. On September 20, 

2023, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). 

The motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 Andrea Gordon, 

Plaintiff(s),

v.

 The Bay Area Air Quality

Management District, 

Defendant(s).

___________________________________/

Case No. C08-3630 BZ

REFRESHMENT ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States District Court Jury Commissioner shall

furnish daily morning refreshments and pastries for the members of the jury in the above-entitled

matter beginning Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 8:00 a.m., for the duration of the trial, and lunch

during jury deliberations, at the expense of the United States. The trial will be held in Courtroom G

, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 10, 2010

 

BERNARD ZIMMERMAN

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:08-cv-03630-BZ Document 154 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Steven Roon, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 23, 1977, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2814 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2814

  To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 
 reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the 
              treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2005

 Mr. McNulty (for himself, Mr. Herger, Mrs. McCarthy, and Mr. Davis of 
   Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on 
 Ways and Means, Government Reform, Armed Services, Veterans' Affairs, 
   and Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 
 reimbursement of a drug that is prescribed to a sex offender for the 
              treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR DRUGS PRESCRIBED TO SEX OFFENDERS FOR 
              THE TREATMENT OF SEXUAL OR ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION.

    (a) Restriction.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, no Federal funds may be expended for the payment or 
        reimbursement, including payment or reimbursement under the 
        programs described in paragraph (2), of a drug that is 
        prescribed to an individual described in paragraph (3) for the 
        treatment of sexual or erectile dysfunction.
            (2) Programs described.--The programs described in this 
        paragraph are the medicaid program, the medicare program, the 
        Federal employees health benefits program, the Defense Health 
        Program, the program of medical care furnished by the Secretary 
        of Veterans Affairs, health related programs administered by 
        the Indian Health Service, health related programs funded under 
        the Public Health Service Act, and any other Federal health 
        program.
            (3) Individual described.--An individual described in this 
        paragraph is an individual who has a conviction for sexual 
        abuse, sexual assault, or any other sexual offense.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to drugs dispensed 
on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued August 15, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00800-CV

———————————

CITY OF HOUSTON AND THE POLICE OFFICERS’ AND 

FIREFIGHTERS’ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, Appellants

V.

LISA SIMMONS ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2004-44542

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 29, 2012. On July 24, 2013, 

the parties filed a joint motion requesting that we reverse the trial court’s judgment 

and render judgment in favor of appellants, City of Houston and the Police 

Officers’ and Firefighters’ Civil Service Commission, that appellees, Lisa 
2

Simmons et al., take nothing on their overtime claims. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2)(A). No opinion has issued.

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, reverse the judgment 

of the trial court, and render judgment that Lisa Simmons et al. take nothing on 

their overtime claims. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A), 43.2(c). We dismiss any 

other pending motions as moot. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate within 

10 days of the date of this opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.
### §7134. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; compensation of Chairman and members

There shall be within the Department, a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission established by subchapter IV of this chapter (hereinafter referred to in this chapter as the "Commission"). The Chairman shall be compensated at the rate provided for level III of the Executive Schedule under section 5314 of title 5. The other members of the Commission shall be compensated at the rate provided for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5. The Chairman and members of the Commission shall be individuals who, by demonstrated ability, background, training, or experience, are specially qualified to assess fairly the needs and concerns of all interests affected by Federal energy policy.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title II, §204, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 571.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–91, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 565, known as the Department of Energy Organization Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7101 of this title and Tables.
§ 1003.601 Nondiscrimination. ( a ) Under the authority of section 107(e)(2) of the Act, the Secretary waives the requirement that grantees comply with section 109 of the Act except with respect to the prohibition of discrimination based on age, sex, religion, or against an otherwise qualified disabled individual.
( b ) A grantee shall comply with the provisions of title II of Pub. L. 90-284 (24 U.S.C. 1301—the Indian Civil Rights Act) in the administration of a program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this part. For purposes of this section, “program or activity” is defined as any function conducted by an identifiable administrative unit of the grantee; and “funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this part” means that ICDBG funds in any amount have been transferred by the grantee to an identifiable administrative unit and disbursed in a program or activity.
( c ) A grantee shall comply with the equal access to HUD-assisted or -insured housing requirements in 24 CFR 5.105(a)(2).
[61 FR 40090, July 31, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 80993, Nov. 17, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imperial Petroleum Recovery
Corporation; (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Alan B. Springer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

       1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

       2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By:   /s/ Alan B. Springer                                   May 16, 2006
   -----------------------------------------
      Alan B. Springer
      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                       27
§ 1508.850 What is the standard of proof in a debarment action? ( a ) In any debarment action, we must establish the cause for debarment by a preponderance of the evidence.
( b ) If the proposed debarment is based upon a conviction or civil judgment, the standard of proof is met.
#### In re BROOKLYN, Q. C. & S. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 15, 1905.)

In the matter of the application of the Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad Company for a writ of mandamus, etc.

PER CURIAM.

Reargument ordered for March 6, 1905, upon the question whether section 99 of the Railroad Law (Laws 1890, p. 1112, c. 565) does not now provide the sole limit of time for construction imposed by that statute upon street surface railroads, and does not operate to exclude them from the purview of section 5 of the same statute.
#### CARMICHAEL v. JOHN HANCOCK MUT. INS. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 17, 1905.)

Action by Elizabeth Carmichael against the John Hancock Mutual Insurance Company. No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:28PM -----
To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 
From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 
Date: 02/12/2010 12:14PM 
cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael 
Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 
Subject: RE: RICE package 
 
Hi Cortney, 
Glad you made it back in!  Did I hear there was a chance of more snow next week?  I hope 
not. 
 
I sent you the impacts memo that Kevin requested.  The underlying information for the 
population estimates comes from the Power Systems Research population information that 
we received from OTAQ.  Attached are the spreadsheets used to generate the population 
estimates.   
(See attached file: OTAQ-PSR 1998 RICE pop-sales data.xls) (See attached file: CI 
Projection 2007-2017 by NAICS - January 2009.xls) 
 
Melanie King 
Energy Strategies Group 
Sector Policies and Programs Division 
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
 
Mail Code D243-01 
RTP, NC  27711 
 
Phone:  (919) 541-2469 
Fax:       (919) 541-5450 
king.melanie@epa.gov 
 
"Higgins, Cortney" ---02/12/2010 09:20:43 AM---Hi Melanie, Thanks for the update -- let me 
know when it will come over.
 
From:
 
"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>
 
To:
 
Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
 
Date:
 
02/12/2010 09:20 AM
 
Subject
:
 
RE: RICE package
 
 
 
 
Hi Melanie, 
Thanks for the update -- let me know when it will come over.     
 
I'm in the office today! It's good to be back. 
 
Can you provide the memo (or send the citation for the memo) for the 
sector estimates of engines?   
 
Thanks, 
Cortney 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov ] 
 
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:30 PM 
To: Higgins, Cortney 
Subject: RICE package 
 
 
Hi Cortney, 
We're finishing up our latest round of revisions to the RICE package. 
It's been a bit of a slow go due to difficulties in getting in touch 
with some of the EPA folks up in D.C.  We should send you the revised 
package either later tonight or first thing tomorrow. 
 
Take care, 
 
Melanie King 
Energy Strategies Group 
Sector Policies and Programs Division 
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency 
 
Mail Code D243-01 
RTP, NC  27711 
 
Phone:  (919) 541-2469 
Fax:       (919) 541-5450 
king.melanie@epa.gov
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

United States District Court 

Northern District of Californi

a

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CHARLES STEVENS, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

RON DAVIS, Warden, San Quentin State 

Prison 

 Respondent. 

No. C 09-0137 WHA 

DEATH PENALTY CASE 

ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 

 

 The parties filed a joint case management conference statement wherein petitioner requests 

a sixty-day continuance of the case management conference scheduled for September 14. 

Petitioner’s unopposed motion is granted. 

The parties shall appear for a case management conference on November 3 at 11:00 a.m. in 

Courtroom 8 on the 19th floor. The parties will submit a joint case management conference 

statement one week prior, due on or before October 27. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 8, 2016

_________________________ 

WILLIAM ALSUP 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:09-cv-00137-WHA Document 136 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 1