alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JO ANNE E. HASELTINE,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

))))))))))

No. C 08-5782 BZ

SCHEDULING ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for JUNE

16, 2010 is VACATED.  The Court will rule on the Motion to

Strike (Doc. No. 67) concurrently with the motions for summary

judgment.  

Dated:  June 4, 2010

          Bernard Zimmerman 

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\HASELTINE v. ASTRUE\SCHED ORD.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-05782-BZ   Document 68   Filed 06/04/10   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,525
<INVENTORY>                                      7,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,537
<PP&E>                                          43,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,836
<SALES>                                        147,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,503
<CGS>                                          133,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,040)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 62
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 62 appear at 64 FR 54539, Oct. 7, 1999, and 67 FR 17612, 17613, Apr. 11, 2002.

§ 62.42 Transfer of program. ( a ) Program sponsors may, pursuant to the provisions set forth in this section, permit an exchange visitor to transfer from one designated program to another designated program.
( b ) The responsible officer of the program to which the exchange visitor is transferring: ( 1 ) Shall verify the exchange visitor's visa status and program eligibility;
( 2 ) Execute the Form DS-2019; and
( 3 ) Secure the written release of the current sponsor.
( c ) Upon return of the completed Form DS-2019, the responsible officer of the program to which the exchange visitor has transferred shall provide: ( 1 ) The exchange visitor his or her copy of the Form DS-2019; and
( 2 ) A notification copy of such form to the Department of State.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 04-27578) published on page 75314 of the issue for Thursday, December 16, 2004.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis heading, the entry for Martin B. Rowe, Harrisburg, Illinois, is revised to read as follows:

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1.  Martin B. Rowe*, Harrisburg, Illinois, individually and as a member of the Rowe Family Control Group, which consists of Martin B. Rowe, the Burt H. Rowe, Jr. Marital Trust and the Anne Rowe Family Trust, all of Harrisburg, Illinois; Marianna R. Deal, Rachelle L. Rowe, and Caroline C. Rowe, all of St. Louis, Missouri; and Anne Rowe, St. Louis, Missouri; to acquire control of First Eldorado Bancshares, Inc., Eldorado, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire control of Dana Bancorp, Inc., Dana, Indiana, The First National Bank of Dana, Dana Indiana, and First State Bank of Eldorado, Eldorado, Illinois.                

Comments on this application must be received by January 3, 2005.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-28063 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStructural tests and development of a laminar flow control wing surface composite chordwise jointThe dramatic increases in fuel costs and the potential for periods of limited fuel availability provided the impetus to explore technologies to reduce transport aircraft fuel consumption. NASA sponsored the Aircraft Energy Efficiency (ACEE) program beginning in 1976 to develop technologies to improve fuel efficiency. The Lockheed-Georgia Company accomplished under NAS1-16235 Laminar-Flow-Control (LFC) Wing Panel Structural Design and Development (WSSD); design, manufacturing, and testing activities. An in-depth preliminary design of the baseline 1993 LFC wing was accomplished. A surface panel using the Lockheed graphite/epoxy integrated LFC wing box structural concept was designed. The concept was shown by analysis to be structurally efficient and cost effective. Critical details of the surface and surface joint was demonstrated by fabricating and testing complex, concept selection specimens. The Lockheed-Georgia Company accomplishments, Development of LFC Wind Surface Composite Structures (WSCS), are documented. Tests were conducted on two CV2 panels to verify the static tension and fatigue strength of LFC wing surface chordwise joints.Document ID19880004684Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLineberger, L. B.*(Lockheed-Georgia Co. Marietta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1984Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-CR-172462LG84ER0113NAS 1.26:172462Accession Number88N14066Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17487Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880004684.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2774 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2774

   To suspend temporarily the duty on basic yellow 40 chloride based.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on basic yellow 40 chloride based.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC YELLOW 40 CHLORIDE BASED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.70      Basic yellow 40     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         chloride based                                                     31/2009
                         (CAS No. 29556-33-
                         0) provided for
                         in subheading
                         3204.13.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Harold Sink, Respondent.

Order and amended order unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: It is claimed by the District Attorney that the indictment alleges the crime of conspiracy to commit acts injurious to public health and morals and to pervert and obstruct justice and the due administration of the laws (Penal Law, § 580, subd. 6). The defendants have demurred to the indictment and the demurrers have been sustained by the County Court Judge. We agree with the result reached in County Court. A defendant may demur *869to an indictment when it appears on the face thereof that it does not conform substantially to the requirements of section 275 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code Grim. Pro., § 323, subd. 2). Section 275 provides that the indictment must contain *“*a plain and concise statement of the act constituting the crime, without unnecessary repetition.” This indictment is anything but plain and concise. It is repetitious, prolix, contains much irrelevant and improper matter and lacks arrangement and orderliness. It is confused and confusing and very inartistically drawn. If one painstakingly searches the document and the maze of allegations therein and draws certain inferences, he may glean a theory of conspiracy to obstruct justice by violating the provisions of the Penal Law relating to larceny and to public morals. This is the most that can be said for this so-called indictment. It would be most unfair to defendants to force them to trial under an indictment such as this. It would also present great difficulties to the Trial Judge and, if the indictment is read to the trial jury, it would be confusing to the jury. The object of section 275 is to prevent indictments of this type. The order appealed from permits resubmission. Just why this was not done, rather than to endeavor to defend the indefensible paper that is before us is difficult to understand. The order appealed from should be affirmed. (Appeal by plaintiff from order and amended order of Onondaga County Court dismissing an indictment charging conspiracy. The amended order directed resubmission to the Grand Jury.) Present—Williams, P. J., Bastow, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §669b. Grants to States for access and visitation programs

#### (a) In general

The Administration for Children and Families shall make grants under this section to enable States to establish and administer programs to support and facilitate noncustodial parents' access to and visitation of their children, by means of activities including mediation (both voluntary and mandatory), counseling, education, development of parenting plans, visitation enforcement (including monitoring, supervision and neutral drop-off and pickup), and development of guidelines for visitation and alternative custody arrangements.

#### (b) Amount of grant

The amount of the grant to be made to a State under this section for a fiscal year shall be an amount equal to the lesser of—

(1) 90 percent of State expenditures during the fiscal year for activities described in subsection (a); or

(2) the allotment of the State under subsection (c) for the fiscal year.

#### (c) Allotments to States

#### (1) In general

The allotment of a State for a fiscal year is the amount that bears the same ratio to $10,000,000 for grants under this section for the fiscal year as the number of children in the State living with only 1 biological parent bears to the total number of such children in all States.

#### (2) Minimum allotment

The Administration for Children and Families shall adjust allotments to States under paragraph (1) as necessary to ensure that no State is allotted less than—

(A) $50,000 for fiscal year 1997 or 1998; or

(B) $100,000 for any succeeding fiscal year.

#### (d) No supplantation of State expenditures for similar activities

A State to which a grant is made under this section may not use the grant to supplant expenditures by the State for activities specified in subsection (a), but shall use the grant to supplement such expenditures at a level at least equal to the level of such expenditures for fiscal year 1995.

#### (e) State administration

Each State to which a grant is made under this section—

(1) may administer State programs funded with the grant, directly or through grants to or contracts with courts, local public agencies, or nonprofit private entities;

(2) shall not be required to operate such programs on a statewide basis; and

(3) shall monitor, evaluate, and report on such programs in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

(Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, title IV, §469B, as added Pub. L. 104–193, title III, §391, Aug. 22, 1996, 110 Stat. 2258.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date of section, see section 395(a)–(c) of Pub. L. 104–193, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 654 of this title.
§ 19.3 Participants. The following persons are participants in the System: ( a ) Members of the Service serving under a career appointment or as a career candidate under section 306 of the Act ( 1 ) in the Senior Foreign Service, or
( 2 ) assigned to a salary class in the Foreign Service Schedule;
( b ) Any person not otherwise entitled to be a participant who has served as chief of mission or an ambassador at large for an aggregate period of 20 years or more, exclusive of extra service credit for service at unhealthful posts, and who has paid into the Fund a special contribution for each year of service;
( c ) Any individual who was appointed as a Binational Center Grantee and who completed, prior to February 15, 1981, at least 5 years of satisfactory service as a grantee, as determined by the Director of Personnel of USICA, or under any other appointment under the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as amended, who has paid into the Fund a special contribution for such service.
( d ) Any person converted to the competitive service pursuant to section 2104 of the Act who elects to participate in the System pursuant to section 2106(b)(1) or (2) shall remain a participant so long as he/she is employed in an agency which is authorized to utilize the Foreign Service personnel system.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:09:23-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2678 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2678

   To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of (1A1B1A)-(cis and 
 trans)-1-(2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)- 4-propyl-1,3-dioxalan-2-yl)methyl)-
      1H-1,2,4-triazole (Propiconazole) and application adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

   Mr. Holt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of (1A1B1A)-(cis and 
 trans)-1-(2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)- 4-propyl-1,3-dioxalan-2-yl)methyl)-
      1H-1,2,4-triazole (Propiconazole) and application adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF (<plus-minus>)-(CIS AND TRANS)-1-(2-(2,4-
              DICHLOROPHENYL) -4-PROPYL-1,3-DIOXALAN-2-YL)METHYL)-1H-
              1,2,4-TRIAZOLE (PROPICONAZOLE) AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.62       Mixtures of        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (<plus-minus>)-(c                                                  31/2008
                         is and trans)-1-
                         (2-(2,4-
                         Dichlorophenyl) -
                         4-propyl-1,3-
                         dioxalan-2-
                         yl)methyl)-1H-1,2
                         ,4-triazole
                         (Propiconazole)
                         (CAS No. 60207-90-
                         1) and
                         application
                         adjuvants
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.20.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 115.101 Program administration. ( a ) *Authority and responsibility.* The Secretary has delegated the authority and responsibility for administering this part to the Assistant Secretary.
( b ) *Delegation of Authority.* The Assistant Secretary retains the right to make final decisions concerning the granting and withdrawal of substantial equivalency interim certification and certification. The Assistant Secretary delegates the authority and responsibility for administering the remainder of this part to the FHEO regional director. This includes assessing the performance of interim and certified agencies as described in § 115.206. This also includes the offering of a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) as described in § 115.210 and the suspension of interim certification or certification due to performance deficiencies as described in § 115.210.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

REQUEST

FOR CALCULATIONS 

FOR TRIAL

Both sides are invited to run calculations to ascertain how the fund would have done if the

25-percent non-guaranteed mortgaged-back securities limitation had been honored with the

excess over the 25 percent being: (a) kept in cash (Calculation One), and (b) distributed pro rata

among the other non-guaranteed mortgage-back securities investments (up to the limit of any

other industry limitation) (Calculation Two). These should then be pared down to those who

were shareholders as of the date of the mortgage-back securities industry limitation deletion. 

This should then be compared to the way it did turn out. This should be done in time for each

side to depose the experts on these calculations reasonably before trial. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01936-WHA Document 55 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDUARDO DE LA TORRE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CASHCALL, INC.,

Defendant.

Case No. 08-cv-03174-MEJ 

ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The Case Management Conference previously ordered and set for February 19, 2015

before the Honorable Maria-Elena James, is hereby moved to February 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in 

Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. The Joint Case 

Management Statement is now due by February 10, 2015, and shall contain information

regarding the parties’ prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and whether the parties would 

be amenable to attending another settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Spero, or another 

form of ADR, prior to trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 30, 2015

______________________________________

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03174-TSH Document 270 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 1