alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,018,540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,820,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                   714,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,608,638
<PP&E>                                       7,496,794
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,339,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,755,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,298,281
<BONDS>                                      7,408,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,445
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,686,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,755,993
<SALES>                                      3,129,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,014,971
<CGS>                                          745,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,375,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,045,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             254,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (237,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (237,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (237,703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Patricia Barksdale, Petitioner, v Joseph A. D’Elia, as Commissioner of the Nassau County Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated April 20, 1977 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to discontinue a grant of aid to dependent children. Determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and respondents are directed to *1019reinstate the grant retroactively, as of the date of its termination. In the absence in this record of a showing of lack of need, we are not persuaded that the determination to discontinue public assistance to a mother and two infant children was supported by substantial evidence (see *Matter of Rosa v Lavine,*50 AD2d 571). Latham, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Carl Edelson.

Motion for leave to reargue denied. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Noonan, JJ.
#### John D. Alm et al., Respondents, v State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No.

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, and facts, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The State appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims which granted respondent an award for damages resulting from the appropriation of a portion of his property for construction of an expressway. Among several issues raised by the State is that the court improperly awarded consequential damages for a 4.077 acre area of back land contiguous to front development land without any basis in the record for such award. A review of the record indicates that both claimant’s appraiser and the State’s appraiser assigned greater value to that portion of land after the taking. Claimant’s appraiser concluded that such increase was offset by a decrease attributable to a loss of frontage and the subject parcel’s proximity to the expressway; the State’s expert found no such offsetting damages. In either view, however, there was no diminution in the value of that parcel and the court’s award in the amount of $407.70 was therefore unfounded. Similarly, the court found that a .255 acre parcel subject to a drainage easement had no value after the taking. The court’s finding that this parcel was worthless was beyond the range of the testimony and has no support in the record. The land in which the .255 acres was included was given an after value of $100 per acre by claimant’s appraiser and of $350 per acre by the State’s expert. Accepting claimant’s appraiser’s figures, the lowest value that could be assigned to the land subject to the easement is $25.50. The award should therefore be decreased by $433.20. The remainder of the award and its separate components of direct damages and consequential damages are within the range of expert testimony and are therefore affirmed. *(Lott*v *State of New York,*55 AD2d 1032; *Yonkers Realty Assoc, v State of New York, 52*AD2d 1014, 1015; *Sapia v State of New York,*33 AD2d 821; *Argersinger v State of New York,*32 AD2d 708.) (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims—appropriation.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Denman and Witmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 27 (Tuesday, February 10, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 6364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2829]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 4620]


30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Forms DS-2053, 
DS-3024, DS-3025 and DS-3026; Medical Examination for Immigrant or 
Refugee Applicant; OMB Control Number 1405-0113

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995. Comments should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the 
publication of this notice.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved collection.
    Originating Office: Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department of State 
(CA/VO).
    Title of Information Collection: Medical Examination for Immigrant 
or Refugee Applicant.
    Frequency: On occasion. Once per respondent.
    Form Number: DS-2053, DS-3024, DS-3025 and DS-3026.
    Respondents: Immigrant visa and refugee applicants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 630,000 per year.
    Average Hours Per Response: 1 hour.
    Total Estimated Burden: 630,000 hours per year.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to:
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Evaluate whether the proposed information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information will have practical 
utility.
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate 
of the burden of the proposed collection, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used.
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet<ls-thn-eq> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of technology.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the proposed information 
collection and supporting documents may be obtained from Brendan 
Mullarkey of the Office of Visa Services, U.S. Department of State, 
2401 E St. NW, RM L-703, Washington, DC 20520, who may be reached on 
(202) 663-1166. Public comments and questions should be directed to the 
State Department Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, DC 20530, 
who may be reached on (202) 395-7860.

    Dated: January 30, 2004.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Visa Services, Bureau of 
Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 04-2829 Filed 2-9-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
### §7477. Enforcement

The Administrator shall, and a State may, take such measures, including issuance of an order, or seeking injunctive relief, as necessary to prevent the construction or modification of a major emitting facility which does not conform to the requirements of this part, or which is proposed to be constructed in any area designated pursuant to section 7407(d) of this title as attainment or unclassifiable and which is not subject to an implementation plan which meets the requirements of this part.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title I, §167, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title I, §127(a), Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 740; amended Pub. L. 101–549, title I, §110(3), title VII, §708, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2470, 2684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–549, §708, substituted "construction or modification of a major emitting facility" for "construction of a major emitting facility".

Pub. L. 101–549, §110(3), substituted "designated pursuant to section 7407(d) as attainment or unclassifiable" for "included in the list promulgated pursuant to paragraph (1)(D) or (E) of subsection (d) of section 7407 of this title".
§ 2004.24 Processing demands or requests. ( a ) After service of a demand or request to testify, the Counsel will review the demand or request and, in accordance with the provisions of this subpart, determine whether, or under what conditions, to authorize the employee to testify on matters relating to official information and/or to produce official records and information.
( b ) The OIG will process requests in the order in which they are received. Absent exigent or unusual circumstances, OIG will respond within 30 days from the date that we receive all information necessary to the evaluation of the demand or request. The time for response will depend upon the scope of the request.
( c ) The Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure described in this subpart where a waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of OIG, HUD, and the United States, or for other good cause.
#### In the Matter of Sharlene Mitrione, Appellant, v County of Westchester, Defendant, and Westchester County Medical Center, Respondent.

[715 NYS2d 887]

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief and further limited by letter dated May 9, 2000, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), dated September 28, 1999,. as denied that branch of the petition which was for leave to serve *318a late notice of claim on the respondent Westchester County Medical Center.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petition insofar as it was for leave to serve a late notice of claim on the Westchester County Medical Center *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Matter of Ford v County of Nassau,*273 AD2d 309, *lv denied*95 NY2d 763; *Moise v County of Nassau,*234 AD2d 275; *see generally, Matter of Bischert v County of Westchester,*212 AD2d 529; *Matter of Santana v City of New York,*211 AD2d 636; *cf., Matter of Leone v County of Nassau,*225 AD2d 776). Bracken, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Accident PreventionChild HealthChild SafetyChild WelfareEmergency ProgramsHigh Risk StudentsInjuriesPreschool ChildrenPreschool EducationResource MaterialsSafetySafety EducationStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:19:13-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations found on
pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Form 10-QSB for the year to date, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         413,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    107,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               521,401
<PP&E>                                         129,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 698,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          452,634
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        15,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   698,312
<SALES>                                         50,512
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  653,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (616,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (616,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 73,770
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (542,534)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)


</TABLE>
#### § 96.61 [Reserved]
#### § 214.15 Changes in membership.

Changes in membership of advisory committees are proposed by the Bureau of Office through which the committee reports, are cleared by the Advisory Committee Management Officer and the Office of the General Counsel, and are approved by the A.I.D. Administrator.
§ 1000.430 When will HUD issue notice to the applicant if the application is approved at the requested or reduced amount? ( a ) HUD shall make every effort to approve a guarantee within 30 days of receipt of a completed application including executed documents and, if unable to do so, will notify the applicant within the 30 day timeframe of the need for additional time and/or if additional information is required.
( b ) HUD shall notify the applicant in writing that the guarantee has either been approved, reduced, or disapproved. If the request is reduced or disapproved, the applicant will be informed of the specific reasons for reduction or disapproval.
( c ) HUD shall issue a certificate to guarantee the debt obligation of the issuer subject to compliance with NAHASDA including but not limited to sections 105, 601(a), and 602(c) of NAHASDA, and such other reasonable conditions as HUD may specify in the commitment documents in a particular case.
#### Powell *v.*Fowler.

Lumpkin, J.

1. No demurrer was filed raising the question of whether the charge of fraud in the petition was sufficient.

2. An exchange of lands was made between two parties. One of the parties sued the other, alleging that the defendant had fraudulently-represented that the tract which he was to convey to the plaintiff contained 300 acres, when it in fact contained much less, and the plaintiff *398sought to recover proportionately for the shortage. *3eld,*that the evidence as to the existence of actual fraudulent representations and the reliance thereon was sufficient to be submitted to the jury; hut the only evidence as to the actual contents of the tract of land being the deed made to the defendant by the person from whom he purchased it, in which the tract was described as containing “240 acres, more or less,” this was not sufficient to show the actual shortage to be sixty acres, and authorize a recovery on that basis.

July 11, 1912.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Pendleton. Pulton superior court. May 24, 1911.

*B. J. Jordan*and *Simmons & Simmons,*for plaintiff -in error.

*B. B. Arnold, Hill & Wright,*and *J. P. Broohe,*contra.

3. None of the other grounds of the motion for a new trial were meritorious. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 51.26 Photographs.

The applicant must submit with his or her application photographs as prescribed by the Department that are a good likeness of and satisfactorily identify the applicant.
###### Editorial Note on Part 200

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 200.22 Operating loss loans.

An insured loan to cover the operating losses of a project with an existing Commissioner insured mortgage may be made in accordance with provisions of section 223(d) of the Act and such terms and conditions established by the Commissioner.
May 11 , 2015

The Honorable john Kerry Secretary of State U

.S
. Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Wash i ngton , DC 20520 The Honorable Anthony Fo xx Secretary of Transportati on U

.S
. Department of Transportati on 1200 New jersey Avenue , SE Wash i ngton , DC 20590 The Honorable Penny S
. Pr i tzker Secretary of Commerce U

.S
. Department of Commerce 1401 Consti tution Avenue , NW Wash i ngton , DC 20230 Dear Secretary Kerry , Secretary Fo xx and Secretary Pri tzker : MYRTLE BEACH AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

On behalf of the M yrtle Beach Area Chamber of Commerce , dba Myrtle Beach Area Conventi on and V i si

tors Bureau , I am writ i ng to you regard i ng Open Ski es . Our dest i nat i on has hi stor i cally been a domest i c dr i ve-to destination but in recent years, we have begun to aggress i vely promote our dest i nat i on outside of the Un i ted States
. Attract i ng internat i onal vi sitors to our commun i ty i s a key component of our strateg i c plan, des i gned to grow touri sm, create jobs and strengthen our economy . To meet these i mportant ob ject i ves , we must be able to offer internati onal travelers a conven i ent , affordable experi ence . That is why we strongly support the Open Ski es pol i cy . Open Ski es agreements have i ncreased the number of fl i

ghts to all reg i ons of the Un i ted States , lead i ng to more ai rl i

ne competi t i

on , access to new and grow i ng markets and lower fares. Th i s i

s good for travelers , the touri sm i ndustry and the ent i re U
. S
. economy . Open Ski es i s essent i al to grow i ng le i sure trave l and bus iness t r avel to our dest inat i on . If we are to effectively compete in today ' s global marketplace for internat i onal travelers , we si mply must preserve policies l i ke Open Skies that enhance internat i onal travel worldw i de
. To be clear, we are not afra i d of competi t i

on . We compete aggress i vely w i th other dest i nat i ons across the country and around the world
. Competi tion i s good for consume rs and good for the growth of our industry , producing an improved travel product and encourag i ng more vi si

tors to come here. Why wouldn 't that same pri nciple hold true i n i

nternat i onal aviation as well? On behalf of nearly 3 , 000 bus i nesses and 46,000 employees , we urge you to preserve all e xi st i ng Open Skies agreements and work to expand th i s successful pol i cy . Sincerely,
Brad Dean President & CEO P

.O
. Box 2115 • 1200 North Oak Street • Myrtle Beach , South Carolina 29578 • (843) 626-7444 www .MyrtleBeachAreaChamber
. com • www . V i sitMyrt l eBeach .com
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2576 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2576

          To extend the suspension of duty on Ethyl pyruvate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the suspension of duty on Ethyl pyruvate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYL PYRUVATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.48 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Ethyl pyruvate) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```