alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §300a–8. Penalty for United States, etc., officer or employee coercing or endeavoring to coerce procedure upon beneficiary of Federal program

Any—

(1) officer or employee of the United States,

(2) officer or employee of any State, political subdivision of a State, or any other entity, which administers or supervises the administration of any program receiving Federal financial assistance, or

(3) person who receives, under any program receiving Federal financial assistance, compensation for services,

who coerces or endeavors to coerce any person to undergo an abortion or sterilization procedure by threatening such person with the loss of, or disqualification for the receipt of, any benefit or service under a program receiving Federal financial assistance shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(Pub. L. 94–63, title II, §205, July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 308.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Family Planning and Population Research Act of 1975, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1975, see section 608 of Pub. L. 94–63, set out as an Effective Date of 1975 Amendment note under section 247b of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2547 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2547

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent blue 124.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

 Mr. Langevin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Solvent blue 124.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SOLVENT BLUE 124.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.73 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Solvent blue 124) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2678 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of (1A1B1A)–(cis and trans)– 

1-(2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)- 4-propyl-1,3-dioxalan-2-yl)methyl)–1H-1,2,4- 

triazole (Propiconazole) and application adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of (1A1B1A)– 

(cis and trans)–1-(2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)- 4-propyl-1,3- 

dioxalan-2-yl)methyl)–1H-1,2,4-triazole (Propiconazole) 

and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2678 IH 

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF ( ≤ )–(CIS AND TRANS)–1-(2-(2,4- 

2 DICHLOROPHENYL) -4-PROPYL-1,3-DIOXALAN3 2-YL)METHYL)–1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOLE 

4 (PROPICONAZOLE) AND APPLICATION ADJU5 VANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.62 Mixtures of ( ± )–(cis and 

trans)–1-(2-(2,4- 

Dichlorophenyl) -4-propyl1,3-dioxalan-2-yl)methyl)– 

1H–1,2,4-triazole 

(Propiconazole) (CAS No. 

60207–90–1) and application adjuvants (provided for 

in subheading 3808.20.15) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(1)


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") of Brantley Capital Corporation (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Robert P. Pinkas, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                                             /s/ Robert P. Pinkas
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Name: Robert P. Pinkas
                                             Date: August 14, 2002
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between R. Pagnan & F.LLI., Respondent, and Finagrain, S.A. Compagnie Commercials Agricole Et Financiers et al., Respondents. In the Matter of the Arbitration between R. Pagnan & F.LLI., Respondent, and Fribesco S.A., et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on October 8, 1976, unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Stecher, J. and the opinion of Stecher, J. in the companion proceeding of *Matter of Fribesco (Mitsui & Co.),*order of said court entered on January 3, 1977, unanimously affirmed on the opinion of Stecher, J., dated October 6, 1976 and appeal from judgment of said court entered on November 8, 1976, dismissed as academic. Respondents Pagnan and Finagrain shall recover of appellant one bill of $40 costs and disbursements of these appeals. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.
[File

No. 6695.]

#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF FARGO, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. FRED J. KROGH and Honorable M. J. Englert, Judge of the District Court, Respondents.

(294 N. W. 663.)

Opinion filed November 7, 1940.

*Gonmy & Gonmy,*for petitioner.

' *Burnett, Bergesen & Haahenstad,*for respondent, Fred J. Krogh.

Hokris, J.

This case involves the same parties as First National Bank & Trust Company of Fargo, a Corporation, v. Fred J. Krogh and Hon. M. J. Englert, Judge of the District Court, ante, 363, 294 N. W. 660. The facts presented in the two cases are identical except the description of the property involved, which in this case is lot Y in block 4 of Robert’s Addition to the city of Fargo, North Dakota. The law of that case controls the decision herein. The order of the district court certified to us for review is reversed.

• Nuessle, Ch. J., and Bure, Christianson, and Bubke, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEVA LEMA,

Plaintiff,

v

MARIE CALLENDER’S #86 CONCORD, et

al,

Defendants. /

No C 09-0494 VRW

ORDER

There has been no docket activity in this case brought

under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC § 12181 et seq,

for fourteen months. The last item on the docket is a report of

non-service on certain of the defendants on April 6, 2009. Doc #6.

Plaintiff is now ordered to show cause, on or before July

16, 2010, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of

prosecution. 

The clerk is hereby directed, should plaintiff fail to

file a timely response to this order, to close the file and

terminate all pending motions. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00494-JW Document 7 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 35.23 Subpoenas for attendance at hearing. ( a ) A party wishing to procure the appearance and testimony of any individual at the hearing may request that the ALJ issue a subpoena.
( b ) A subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of an individual may also require the individual to produce documents at the hearing.
( c ) A party seeking a subpoena shall file a written request therefor not less than 15 days before the day fixed for the hearing unless otherwise allowed by the ALJ for good cause shown. Such request shall specify any documents to be produced and shall designate the witnesses and describe the address and location thereof with sufficient particularity to permit such witnesses to be found.
( d ) The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the witness is to appear and any documents the witness is to produce.
( e ) The party seeking the subpoena shall serve it in the manner prescribed in § 35.8. A subpoena on a party or upon an individual under the control of a party may be served within the United States by first class mail.
( f ) A party or the individual to whom the subpoena is directed may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena within ten days after service or on or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance if it is less than ten days after service.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Emmett Johnson, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered April 14, 1961 after a hearing, which dismissed the writ and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Relator, serving a sentence imposed upon him as a multiple offender in 1950, claimed that an earlier indictment to which he pleaded guilty in 1940 was faulty; that the 1940 sentencing court had no jurisdiction because he was deprived of counsel therein; and that the 1940 judgment was invalid because the requirements of section 480 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were omitted by the sentencing court. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 

134339 

MICHAEL TOWNSEND,

Plaintiff, 

v 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 134339 

 AGC: 2018/06 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

On the order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, 

and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the 

requested relief. 

p0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 10.4


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


	
  $23,000

  	
   

  	
  Minneapolis, Minnesota

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  January 25, 2006

  



 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ProUroCare, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation, (“Borrower”) hereby promises to pay to the order of
Adron Holdings, LLC, Minnesota limited liability partnership, or its assignee (“Lender”)
in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in lawful money of the United States of America in
immediately available funds the principal amount of TWENTY THREE THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($23,000.00). Payment of this amount owed by Borrower is
to be made no later than March 14, 2006.


 


In addition, Borrower shall pay Lender an
administrative fee of Four Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($4,000.00) no later
than March 14, 2006; however, in the event the principal amount is fully paid
to Lender before March 14, 2006, the amount of the administrative fee to be
paid will be reduced pro rata based upon a calculation of the fee which would
be charged on a daily basis during the term of the Note and reducing the fee by
the daily rate determined for each day before March 14, 2006 after payment of
the full principal owed.


 


This Note is prepayable in whole or in part
at any time prior to maturity at the option of the undersigned without penalty
or premium. Amounts prepaid shall be first applied to accrued and prepaid
interest and then to principal.


 


In the event of default hereunder, including failure by Borrower to pay
by March 14, 2006 any amount due and owing, Borrower agrees to pay all costs
and expenses of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. Borrower
waives demand, presentment, notice of presentment, protest, notice of protest,
and notice of dishonor.


 


THE VALIDITY, CONSTRUCTION AND ENFORCEABILITY OF THIS NOTE SHALL BE
GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE
CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF.


 


	
  ProUroCare, Inc.

  
	
   

  
	
  By

  	
  Richard B. Thon

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its

  	
  CFO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Office of Research and Development, VA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Government-owned invention available for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of federally funded research and development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for licensing. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Technical and licensing information on the invention may be obtained by writing to: Robert W. Potts, Department of Veterans Affairs, Director Technology Transfer Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420; fax: (202) 254-0260; e-mail:                         *bob.potts@hq.med.va.gov*. Any request for information should include the number and title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention available for licensing is: 

International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/32602 “Detection/Localization and Staging of Tumors Using Labeled Activated Lymphocytes Directed to a Tumor Specific Epitope.” 

Dated: December 17, 2004. 

Anthony J. Principi, 

Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 04-28363 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
### §4855. Federal implementation and insurance study

#### (a) Federal implementation study

The Comptroller General of the United States shall assess the effectiveness of Federal enforcement and compliance with lead safety laws and regulations, including any changes needed in annual inspection procedures to identify lead-based paint hazards in units receiving assistance under subsections (b) and (o) of section 1437f of this title.

#### (b) Insurance study

The Comptroller General of the United States shall assess the availability of liability insurance for owners of residential housing that contains lead-based paint and persons engaged in lead-based paint hazard evaluation and reduction activities. In carrying out the assessment, the Comptroller General shall—

(1) analyze any precedents in the insurance industry for the containment and abatement of environmental hazards, such as asbestos, in federally assisted housing;

(2) provide an assessment of the recent insurance experience in the public housing lead hazard identification and reduction program; and

(3) recommend measures for increasing the availability of liability insurance to owners and contractors engaged in federally supported work.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1056, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3926.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,074,858
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  508,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (11,630)
<INVENTORY>                                     19,837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,664,561
<PP&E>                                         272,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                (88,861)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,994,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,203,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,482
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,994,131
<SALES>                                      1,225,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,225,223
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,056,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (131,599)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,408 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (831,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (831,506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 Certification
I, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2004-13;
1.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.
Date: March 29, 2005
By:      /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given in accordance with Public Law 92-463 that the Actuarial Advisory Committee will hold a virtual meeting on December 11, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (Central Standard Time) on the conduct of the 28th Actuarial Valuation of the Railroad Retirement System. The agenda for this meeting will include a discussion of the assumptions to be used in the 28th Actuarial Valuation. A report containing recommended assumptions and the experience on which the recommendations are based will have been sent by the Acting Chief Actuary to the Committee before the meeting.

                    The meeting will be open to the public. Persons wishing to submit written statements, make oral presentations, or attend the meeting should address their communications or notices to Patricia Pruitt, (                    *Patricia.Pruitt@rrb.gov*), so that information on how to join the virtual meeting can be provided.                

Dated: November 20, 2020.

Stephanie Hillyard,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2020-26116 Filed 11-24-20; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P