alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Maximino Gonzalez, an Attorney, Respondent. Bronx County Bar Association, Petitioner.

First Department,

April 19, 1977

*Herman Frankel*of counsel *(Morris B. Gerstenhaber*with him on the brief), for petitioner.

No appearance on behalf of respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The Bronx County Bar Association filed a petition containing 11 charges of misconduct against the respondent. The charges related to eight separate business transactions. In each transaction, the respondent unlawfully retained sums of money rightfully belonging to others and did not return the money even after demand.

Respondent in some instances retained fees which he was paid even though he rendered no services and, in other instances, he retained money which was entrusted to him to be held in escrow. In one transaction upon which three charges are based, the respondent wrongfully kept over $26,-000 which was the proceeds of the sale of real property.

At the hearing before the Referee, testimony was taken relating to all charges but for charge X. The complainant in that instance had moved and was unavailable to testify.

All of the charges preferred (with the exception of charge X) were sustained by the Referee, and the report of the Referee is confirmed.

We note that respondent did not present any evidence in mitigation of the charges. The record before this court amply indicates that respondent lacks the moral fitness to continue *91as a member of the legal profession. He should be disbarred *(Matter of Liesner,*43 AD2d 223).

Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York, effective May 19, 1977.
§ 513.411 Notice of suspension. When a respondent is suspended, notice shall immediately be given: ( a ) That suspension has been imposed;
( b ) That the suspension is based on an indictment, conviction, or other adequate evidence that the respondent has committed irregularities seriously reflecting on the propriety of further Federal Government dealings with the respondent;
( c ) Describing any such irregularities in terms sufficient to put the respondent on notice without disclosing the Federal Government's evidence;
( d ) Of the cause(s) relied upon under § 513.405 for imposing suspension;
( e ) That the suspension is for a temporary period pending the completion of an investigation or ensuing legal, debarment, or Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act proceedings;
( f ) Of the provisions of § 513.411 through § 513.413 and any other Broadcasting Board of Governors procedures, if applicable, governing suspension decisionmaking; and
( g ) Of the effect of the suspension.
### §5028. Authority of Director

#### (a) In general

The Director is authorized to make grants to or enter into contracts with public or nonprofit organizations, including organizations funded under part A, B, or C, for the purposes of demonstrating innovative activities involving older Americans as volunteers. The Director may support under this part both volunteers receiving stipends and volunteers not receiving stipends.

#### (b) Activities

An organization that receives a grant or enters into a contract under subsection (a) may use funds made available through the grant or contract for activities such as—

(1) linking youth groups and older American organizations in volunteer activities;

(2) involving older volunteers in programs and activities different from programs and activities supported in the community; and

(3) testing whether older American volunteer programs may contribute to new objectives or certain national priorities.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title II, §231, as added Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §351, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 906.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 392 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 4951 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 201

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 201 appear at 62 FR 38027, July 16, 1997.

#### § 201.47 Use of marine insurance loss proceeds.

The borrower/grantee shall pay promptly to USAID a sum equal to the proceeds received by an importer or its assignee in settlement of a marine insurance claim under a marine insurance policy financed pursuant to this part 201, if such proceeds are not expended in the manner provided by § 201.26 within a reasonable period after receipt by the importer.
#### Peter Sobieski, appellee, v. City of Chicago, et al., on appeal of City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,771.

Action for damages for personal injuries through fall of barricade erected in front of building in course of construction. Suit dismissed by plaintiff against one of the owners; verdict of not guilty as to the others; contractor and city of Chicago found guilty. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Rehearing denied July 3, 1923.

*Certiorari*denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, Francis X. Busch, Corporation Counsel, and William H. Devenish, City Attorney, for appellant; Robert H. Farrell and Albert H. Veeder, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel. Morse Ives, H. H. Patterson and C. C. Bodenstab, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) County Supervisor Report (5) Vote on Reglan Ridge Project, (6) Status of Committee Assignments, (7) Report of Projects Funded, (8) General Discussion, (9) Next Agenda.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 13, 2005, from 9 a.m. and end at approximately 12 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 95988.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; E-mail                         *ggaddini@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and individuals who made written requests by January 10, 2005, will have the opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

Dated: December 21, 2004.

Robert McCabe,

Acting Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 04-28304  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### In the Matter of Mount Zion Baptized Holiness Church, Inc., Appellant, v Edwin S. Crane et al., Constituting the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Hempstead, respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent board of zoning appeals as, after a hearing, denied petitioner’s application for a variance of off-street parking requirements for premises it operates as a church, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 11, 1977, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the *584opinion of Mr. Justice Altimari at Special Term. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.
#### (A) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Henry Agard, Appellant. (B) The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard Shands, Appellant.

Motion by appellant to dispense with printing granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney. Appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the May Term, beginning April 24,1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion for assignment of counsel granted. Anthony F. Marra, Esquire, 100 Centre St., New York 13, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-4901-N-52]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

December 23, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988, court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: December 16, 2004.

Mark R. Johnston,

Director, Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.

[FR Doc. 04-27920  Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-29-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131280 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

CLAY TITUS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131280 

 COA: 265392 

WCAC: 04-000119 

SAFWAY STEEL PRODUCTS and ZURICH 

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0821 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 29, 2006 

 Clerk
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL

UNION, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

SAM ROSSELI, et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 09-0404 WHA

ORDER RE PENDING MOTIONS FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND POSSIBLE

SETTLEMENT 

Cross-motions for attorney’s fees will be heard this Thursday at 8 a.m., as scheduled. 

No oppositions have been filed by either party. Instead, a vague statement has been made that

movants are close to settling this matter. This does not excuse the failure to file oppositions. 

Motions must remain on track and be decided unless and until they are withdrawn. At the

hearing on Thursday, counsel must be prepared to address what consequences should flow from

their mutual failure to address each other’s motion. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 2, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00404-WHA Document 718 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 1
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York

corporation, and DOES 1 through 20,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

No. C 08-05445 WHA (Lead Case)

Consolidated with:

No. C 09-00471 WHA

ORDER REGARDING

ACCOUNTING DOCUMENTS

The Court has received a request from Attorney Doug Dexter of Farella Braun + Martel

on behalf of Mr. Minor’s accountant, Raymond Thornson, to retrieve the box of accounting

documents produced by Mr. Thornson and reviewed by the undersigned during trial. As soon as a

verdict is returned, Attorney Dexter may retrieve the box from chambers on the condition that the

documents be kept together and maintained for 28 days, after which the documents may be

disseminated. The box of documents will not include the handful of documents (WTAS334

through WTA342) pertaining to the April 7 balance sheet which the Court provided to counsel for

Christie’s Inc. during trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 20, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 126 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 1
### §63. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, acts May 28, 1924, ch. 203, 43 Stat. 194; Feb. 11, 1925, ch. 209, 43 Stat. 872; May 21, 1926, ch. 355, 44 Stat. 604, which related to time spent at the Military and Naval Academies, expired with the appropriation acts of which it was a part.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT WITNESS DEADLINES 2542999.1

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 

JAMES F. GEARY - 61238 

ELI R. MAKUS - 234287 

jgeary@hansonbridgett.com

emakus@hansonbridgett.com

500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 442-3333 

Facsimile: (916) 442-2348 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF SONOMA and TELECARE CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VALERIE BARBER and ROBERT 

HAMILTON, individually and as 

Successors in Interest for JESSE 

HAMILTON, deceased, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SANTA ROSA; COUNTY OF 

SONOMA; EDWIN FLINT, in his 

capacity as Chief of Police for the City 

of Santa Rosa; GREGORY YAEGER, 

individually and in his capacity as an 

officer of the City of Santa Rosa; 

MICHAEL HEISER, individually and in 

his capacity as an officer of the City of 

Santa Rosa; GREGG AYER, 

individually and in his capacity as an 

officer of the City of Santa Rosa; and 

TELECARE CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

No. CV 08-5649 MMC 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT 

WITNESS DEADLINES 

The parties hereby stipulate to a one week extension of time within which to 

comply with the Court’s February 26, 2010 Pretrial Preparation Order. The agreed upon 

deadlines are as follows: 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:08-cv-05649-MMC Document 68 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 - 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXPERT WITNESS DEADLINES 2542999.1

DESIGNATION OF EXPERTS: 

Plaintiff/Defendant: No later than August 27, 2010 

Plaintiff/Defendant: Rebuttal no later than September 10, 2010 

EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: October 1, 2010 

DATED: August 19, 2010 HERRON & HERRON 

BY: /s/ 

J. WYNNE HERRON, ESQ. 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

VALERIE BARBER and ROBERT 

HAMILTON, individually and as 

Successors in Interest for JESSE 

HAMILTON, deceased

DATED: August 19, 2010 

 By: /s/ 

MATTHEW J. LeBLANC, ESQ., 

ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 

Attorney for Defendants City of Santa 

Rosa; Edwin F. Flint, Gregory Yaeger,

Michael Heiser and Gregg Ayer, 

individually and in their capacity as 

officers of the City of Santa Rosa 

DATED: August 19, 2010 ROGASKI, PREOVOLOS, WEBER & 

PATTERSON, LLP 

 By: /s/ 

CHESTER A. ROGASKI 

Attorneys for Defendant

JAMES F. KENNEDY, M.D. 

DATED: August 19, 2010 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP 

By: /s/

JAMES F. GEARY 

ELI R. MAKUS 

Attorneys for Defendants 

COUNTY OF SONOMA and 

TELECARE CORPORATION 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Maxine M. Chesney

DATE: August 24, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-05649-MMC Document 68 Filed 08/24/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 261 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 261

 To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of 
 status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by 
     extending the deadline for classification petition and labor 
                         certification filings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the class of beneficiaries who may apply for adjustment of 
 status under section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act by 
     extending the deadline for classification petition and labor 
                         certification filings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Section 245(i)(1)(B)(i) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255(i)(1)(B)(i)) is amended by striking 
``April 30, 2001;'' and inserting ``April 30, 2002;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Legal Immigration 
Family Equity Act (as enacted into law by Public Law 106-553).
                                 <all>
```
#### John Manfreda, Respondent, v Kendall Agency, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, motion granted and action dismissed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances demonstrated in the record we find that Special Term’s denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]) was an abuse of its discretion. While plaintiff asserts that settlement negotiations were carried on with defendant’s original counsel following the notice of appearance and demand for a complaint on August 30, 1973, no showing is made as to the extent of such negotiations or as to how long they continued. In any event, no allegation is made of continuing negotiations following substitution of defendant’s counsel and the service of a second *728notice of appearance and demand for a complaint on April 18, 1975. The only reason offered for the delay in serving the complaint from April 18, 1975 until March 12, 1976 immediately preceding the adjourned return date of defendant’s motion to dismiss is that sometime in June, 1975 plaintiff’s counsel moved his office and at that time misplaced the case file. Such explanation relating to law office failure is insufficient to excuse plaintiff’s prolonged delay in serving a complaint. Not only has the plaintiff failed to meet the "heavy burden of explanation” of the delay which is cast upon him *(Solomon v Perkins,*52 AD2d 753, app dsmd 39 NY2d 922; *Hamilton v Dudley,*27 AD2d 701), he also has made no showing of evidentiary facts establishing that he has a viable cause of action (see *Rabetoy v Atkinson,*49 AD2d 691, app dsmd 37 NY2d 803; *Coons v After Dark in Rochester,*56 AD2d 738; *Sortino v Fisher,*20 AD2d 25). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court—dismiss action.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
§ 502.7 Denial of requests. ( a ) The Agency reserves the right to deny any request for program materials made pursuant to these regulations for cause, including but not limited to the following circumstances: ( 1 ) For a Requestor's failure to comply with the Terms of Use on Agency Web sites;
( 2 ) For a Requestor's failure to secure necessary rights and licenses to use third-party copyrighted materials when the Requestor uses Agency program materials in any way not explicitly permitted by the Copyright Act of 1976, as amended;
( 3 ) When the Agency's distribution of program materials is restricted by an agreement with a third-party that holds a copyright in a portion of Agency program materials;
( 4 ) If providing the requested materials would be inconsistent with the Agency's statutory authorities, the broadcasting element's charter, or any applicable law or regulation.
( b ) For more information on the criteria for accepting or denying requests, please see the Agency's policy for domestic distribution, available at *www.bbg.gov .*
#### §§ 530.131-530.139 [Reserved]