alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 103.510 Other action by HUD. In addition to the actions described in § 103.500, HUD may pursue one or more of the following courses of action: ( a ) Refer the matter to the Attorney General for appropriate action (e.g., enforcement of criminal penalties under section 811(c) of the Act).
( b ) Take appropriate steps to initiate proceedings leading to the debarment of the respondent under 2 CFR part 2424, or initiate other actions leading to the imposition of administrative sanctions, where HUD determines that such actions are necessary to the effective operation and administration of federal programs or activities.
( c ) Take appropriate steps to initiate proceedings under: ( 1 ) 24 CFR part 1, implementing title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
( 2 ) 24 CFR 570.912, implementing section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974;
( 3 ) 24 CFR part 8, implementing section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
( 4 ) 24 CFR part 107, implementing Executive Order 11063; or
( 5 ) The Age Discrimination Act, 42 U.S.C. 6101.
( d ) Inform any other Federal, State or local agency with an interest in the enforcement of respondent's obligations with respect to nondiscrimination in housing.
[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 72 FR 73493, Dec. 27, 2007]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN D. BUCK, D.D.S.,

Plaintiff,

    v.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OFAMERICA, et al.,

Defendants                                                                      /

No. C 08-5166 MMC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this

cause,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims alleged herein against defendants

be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to

this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel,

that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the

foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the

calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  March 30, 2010                                                  MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05166-MMC   Document 33   Filed 03/30/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T09:56:50-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2628 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2628

  To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable, tamper-
                  resistant entry and exit documents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2005

  Mr. Flake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify certain deadlines pertaining to machine-readable, tamper-
                  resistant entry and exit documents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEADLINES FOR MACHINE-READABLE, 
              TAMPER-RESISTANT ENTRY AND EXIT DOCUMENTS.

    Section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform 
Act of 2002 (8 U.S.C. 1732) is amended, in each of subsections 
(b)(2)(A), (c)(1), and (c)(2), by striking ``2005,'' and inserting 
``2006,''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 33.8 Claim procedures. ( a ) *Where and when to apply.* Claims must be submitted to the Office Director, Office of Marine Conservation, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs, Room 7820, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520-7818. Claims must be submitted within ninety (90) days after the vessel's release. Requests for extension of the filing deadline must be in writing and approved by the Office Director, Office of Marine Conservation, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs.
( b ) *Contents of claim.* All material allegations of a claim must be supported by documentary evidence. Foreign language documents must be accompanied by an authenticated English translation. Claims must include: ( 1 ) The captain's sworn statement about the exact location and activity of the vessel when seized;
( 2 ) Certified copies of charges, hearings, and findings by the government seizing the vessel;
( 3 ) A detailed computation of all actual costs directly resulting from the seizure and detention, supported by receipts, affidavits, or other documentation acceptable to the Office Director, Office of Marine Conservation, Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs;
( 4 ) A detailed computation of lost income claimed, including: ( i ) The date and time seized and released;
( ii ) The number of miles and running time from the point of seizure to the point of detention;
( iii ) The total fishing time lost (explain in detail if lost fishing time claimed is any greater than the elapsed time from seizure to the time required after release to return to the point of seizure);
( iv ) The tonnage of catch on board at the time of seizure;
( v ) The vessel's average catch-per-day's fishing for the three calendar years preceding the seizure;
( vi ) The vessel's average downtime between fishing trips for the three calendar years preceding the seizure; and
( vii ) The price-per-pound for the catch on the first day the vessel returns to port after the seizure and detention unless there is a pre-negotiated price-per-pound with a processor, in which case the pre-negotiated price must be documented; and
( 5 ) Documentation for confiscated, damaged, destroyed, or stolen equipment, including: ( i ) The date and cost of acquisition supported by invoices or other acceptable proof of ownership; and
( ii ) An estimate from a commercial source of the replacement or repair cost.
( c ) *Burden of proof.* The claimant has the burden of proving all aspects of the claim, except in cases of dispute over the facts of the seizure where the claimant shall have the presumption that the seizure was eligible unless there is clear and convincing credible evidence that the seizure did not meet the eligibility standards of the Act.
### §300ff–135. Notification of employee

#### (a) In general

After receiving a notification for purposes of section 300ff–132 or 300ff–133(d)(2) of this title, a designated officer of emergency response employees shall, to the extent practicable, immediately notify each of such employees who—

(1) responded to the emergency involved; and

(2) as indicated by guidelines developed by the Secretary, may have been exposed to an infectious disease.

#### (b) Certain contents of notification to employee

A notification under this subsection to an emergency response employee shall inform the employee of—

(1) the fact that the employee may have been exposed to an infectious disease and the name of the disease involved;

(2) any action by the employee that, as indicated by guidelines developed by the Secretary, is medically appropriate; and

(3) if medically appropriate under such criteria, the date of such emergency.

#### (c) Responses other than notification of exposure

After receiving a response under paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (d) of section 300ff–133 of this title, or a response under subsection (g)(1) of such section, the designated officer for the employee shall, to the extent practicable, immediately inform the employee of the response.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2695D, as added Pub. L. 111–87, §13, Oct. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 2901.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as if enacted on Sept. 30, 2009, see section 2(a)(3)(B) of Pub. L. 111–87, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment; Revival of Section note under section 300ff–11 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREANDOUS COTTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. BRUNSCHER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 09-cv-00385-WHA (NJV)

REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER

EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING

A settlement conference was held on September 10, 2015, and the results of that 

proceeding are indicated below:

(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the 

proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:

( X ) Plaintiff, Treandous Cotton Pro Se.

( ) Warden or warden’s representative

( X ) Office of the California Attorney General, Sharon Garske.

( X ) Other: Patricia Lee for California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:

_____________________________________________________________________

(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:

( X ) The case has been completely settled. A telephonic status conference is 

scheduled for October 20, 2015 at 1:00 pm. The parties are instructed to dial 888-684-8852 

and enter access code 1868782 to make their appearances.

( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint 

stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet 

Case 3:09-cv-00385-WHA Document 157 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

attached remain for this Court to resolve.

( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 11, 2015

______________________________________

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00385-WHA Document 157 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREANDOUS COTTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. BRUNSCHER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 09-cv-00385-WHA (NJV)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 

District Court, Northern District of California.

That on September 11, 2015, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by 

placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 

depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery 

receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

Treandous Cotton

T-97805

Salinas Valley State Prison

PO Box 1050

Soledad, CA 93960 

Dated: September 11, 2015

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:________________________

Gloria Knudson, Deputy Clerk to the 

Honorable NANDOR J. VADAS

Case 3:09-cv-00385-WHA Document 157 Filed 09/11/15 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

GEOFFREY A. HANSEN

Assistant Federal Public Defender

19th Floor Federal Building – Box 36106

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant AREVALO-HERNANDEZ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

IVAN AREVALO-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-09- 838 MHP

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

SENTENCING DATE

The defendant’s counsel was out of the office much of November and December 2009,

and as a result the defendant could not be interviewed in time for the preparation of a timely

presentence report. As a result, the parties have agreed to have the sentencing in this matter

continued until February 22, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.. The Probation Officer agrees that this date is an

acceptable date for the sentencing.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

1

Case 3:09-cr-00838-MHP Document 11 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Date: 01/06/2010 ________/s/___________________

Geoffrey A. Hansen

Counsel for Defendant Hernandez

Date: 01/06/2010 ________/s/___________________

Daryl T. Eremin

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________

Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Court Judge

2

1/6/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-00838-MHP Document 11 Filed 01/08/10 Page 2 of 2
Amendment No. 2 to Severance Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.11

 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment Number Two is effective as of
August 16, 2010, by and between Rewards Network Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and Christopher J. Locke (“Executive”), and hereby amends the Severance Agreement dated November 7, 2007 by and between
the Corporation and Executive, which was previously amended effective January 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”). 
 I.

 The Agreement is hereby amended to provide that for all purposes under the Agreement, a “Change in
Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if a “Change in Control” occurs for purposes of the Corporation’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as the same may be amended from time to time. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Number Two as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	REWARDS NETWORK INC.
		
	By:	 	       /s/ Ronald L. Blake

	Name:  Ronald L. Blake
	Title:  President and CEO
	
	               /s/
Christopher J. Locke

	Christopher J. Locke
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS F. MARROQUIN,

Petitioner,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 08-5779 MMC (PR)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

On December 30, 2008, petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at the

Correctional Training Facility, Soledad, and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2007 decision by the

California Board of Prison Hearings (“Board”) to deny petitioner parole. Respondent has

filed an answer to the petition and petitioner has filed a traverse.

A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit addresses important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions. See Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th

Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). Consequently, the parties will be directed to file

supplemental briefs setting forth their respective views as to the effect, if any, of the

Hayward en banc decision on the Court’s determination of the instant petition.

Case 3:08-cv-05779-MMC Document 5 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule:

1. No later than ten days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall send to

petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than twenty days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall file

and serve on petitioner a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Hayward on the instant

action. 

3. No later than twenty days from the date respondent’s supplemental brief is

filed, petitioner shall file and serve on respondent either a supplemental brief addressing the

impact of Hayward on the instant action or a notice that he does not intend to file such a

brief.

4. The parties’ respective supplemental briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages in length.

5. The matter will be deemed submitted on the date petitioner’s supplemental brief is

due. No extensions of time will be granted to file the supplemental briefs absent a showing

of exceptional circumstances. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 20, 2010 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05779-MMC Document 5 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the special meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# Date and Time: 

The special meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on February 10, 2004, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - January 8, 2004 (Open and Closed)

### B. Reports 

    - Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Update
    - Preferred Stock Informational Memorandum
    - Syndications—OGC Legal Opinion

### C. New Business—Other 

    - Webcast of FCA Public Meetings
    - EEO Director Position
    - Consolidation of FCA Training Programs
    - Distressed Loan Restructuring—Final Rule
    - Privacy Act—Routine Uses

##                     Closed Session*                                    

### Reports 

    - East Carolina Preferred Stock Issuance Request

Dated: February 4, 2004. 

Jeanette C. Brinkley, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

# Footnotes

*.                             Session Closed—Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), (8) and (9).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 04-2800 Filed 2-5-04; 11:20 am] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
### §6807. State utility regulatory assistance

#### (a) Grants to State utility regulatory commissions and nonregulated electric utilities

The Secretary may make grants to State utility regulatory commissions and nonregulated electric utilities (as defined in the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 [16 U.S.C. 2602]) to carry out duties and responsibilities under titles I [16 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.] and III [15 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.], and section 210 [16 U.S.C. 824a–3], of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. No grant may be made under this section to any Federal agency.

#### (b) Unnecessary requirements prohibited

Any requirements established by the Secretary with respect to grants under this section may be only such requirements as are necessary to assure that such grants are expended solely to carry out duties and responsibilities referred to in subsection (a) or such as are otherwise required by law.

#### (c) Application for grant

No grant may be made under this section unless an application for such grant is submitted to the Secretary in such form and manner as the Secretary may require. The Secretary may not approve an application of a State utility regulatory commission or nonregulated electric utility unless such commission or nonregulated electric utility assures the Secretary that funds made available under this section will be in addition to, and not in substitution for, funds made available to such commission or nonregulated electric utility from other governmental sources.

#### (d) Apportionment of funds

The funds appropriated for purposes of this section shall be apportioned among the States in such manner that grants made under this section in each State shall not exceed the lesser of—

(1) the amount determined by dividing equally among all States the total amount available under this section for such grants, or

(2) the amount which the Secretary is authorized to provide pursuant to subsections (b) and (c) of this section for such State.

(Pub. L. 94–385, title II, §207, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1144; Pub. L. 95–617, title I, §141, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3133.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 95–617, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3117. Title I of such Act is classified principally to chapter 46 (§2601 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation, and title III of such Act is classified generally to chapter 59 (§3201 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2601 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–617 substituted provisions relating to grants to State utility regulatory commissions and nonregulated electric utilities for provisions authorizing appropriations to carry out this subchapter.