alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mayers v. Taylor, et al., Case No. CV 09-0790 EDL (EMC) 

[Proposed] Order Dismissing with Prejudice of Claims Against Defendants Loree Diane Taylor, Highway 

Blues Inc. dba Great Comedy School dba Great Traffic Safety Classes, Interactive Safety Education Inc. dba 

Pizza for You Comedians 2, and Traffic Safety Center Inc. dba Comedy for Less Traffic School 

DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 

2001 CENTER STREET, FOURTH FLOOR

BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94704-1204

(510) 665-8644

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEVEN MAYERS,

 Plaintiff, 

v.

LOREE DIANE TAYLOR, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Case No.: CV 09 0790 EDL (EMC) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING 

WITH PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S 

CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS 

LOREE DIANE TAYLOR, HIGHWAY 

BLUES INC. dba GREAT COMEDY 

SCHOOL dba GREAT TRAFFIC SAFETY 

CLASSES, INTERACTIVE SAFETY 

EDUCATION INC. dba PIZZA FOR YOU 

COMEDIANS 2, TRAFFIC SAFETY 

CENTER INC. dba COMEDY FOR LESS 

TRAFFIC SCHOOL 

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth D. Laporte 

Action Filed: February 23, 2009 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and upon the request of Plaintiff 

Steven Mayers, the Court hereby orders all claims in the First Amended Complaint against 

Defendants Loree Diane Taylor, Highway Blues Inc. dba Great Comedy School dba Great 

Traffic Safety Classes, Interactive Safety Education Inc. dba Pizza for You Comedians 2, and 

Traffic Safety Center Inc. dba Comedy for Less Traffic School dismissed with prejudice. 

DATED: _______________________ 

 ___________________________________ 

 Hon. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Case3:09-cv-00790-EDL Document102 Filed02/17/10 Page3 of 3

February 17, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00790-EDL Document 103 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 1
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 9:52 AM

To: 'gnorth@just1uav.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion: Just 1 UAV LLC (FAA-2015-0120)



### October 2, 2015

Dear Mr. North:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0120). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), m odel(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) sh ould include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by October 16, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
# National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, 2004

On a quiet Sunday morning, December 7, 1941, more than 2,400 Americans were killed in the attack on Pearl Harbor. On that day, life changed in America, and the course of history was altered forever.

Our citizens reacted to the attack with firm determination to defeat tyranny and secure our Nation. This enterprise required the commitment and effort of our entire country. At the height of the conflict, the United States had ships on every ocean and troops on five continents. In all, more than 16 million Americans wore the uniform of our Nation. They came from all walks of life. They served honorably and fought fiercely. At home, millions more contributed to the war effort, laboring for victory in our factories, on farms, and across America.

Today, we honor those who fought and died at Pearl Harbor, and we pay special tribute to the veterans of World War II. These heroes hold a cherished place in our history. Through their courage, sacrifice, and selfless dedication, they saved our country and preserved freedom. As we fight the war on terror, their patriotism continues to inspire a new generation of Americans who have been called to defend the blessings of liberty. Like those who have gone before them throughout our history, our troops fighting the war on terror are defending America from danger and liberating the oppressed.

The Congress, by Public Law 103-308, as amended, has designated December 7 of each year as “National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2004, as National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn occasion with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I urge all Federal agencies, interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United States at half-staff this December 7 in honor of those who died as a result of their service at Pearl Harbor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixth day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 04-27241

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### In the Matter of Patrick Rocco, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents.

[715 NYS2d 899]

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated July 8, 1999, which denied his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated April 10, 2000, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 8, 1999, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated April 10, 2000, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his delay in moving for leave to serve a late notice of claim and failed to demonstrate that the respondents had actual notice of his claim within 90 days of the happening of the accident or a reasonable time thereafter. Thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim *(see,*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Matter of Harris v Dormitory Auth.,*168 AD2d 560). Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.
§ 1006.370 Uniform administrative, requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for Federal awards. ( a ) The DHHL and subrecipients receiving NHHBG funds shall comply with the requirements and standards of 2 CFR part 200, “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards”.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to the applicability of cost principles, all items of cost listed in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E, which require prior Federal agency approval are allowable without the prior approval of HUD to the extent that they comply with the general policies and principles stated in 2 CFR part 200, subpart E, and are otherwise eligible under this part, except for the following: ( i ) Depreciation methods for fixed assets shall not be changed without the approval of the Federal cognizant agency.
( ii ) Fines, penalties, damages, and other settlements are unallowable costs to the NHHBG program.
( iii ) Costs of housing (*e.g.,* depreciation, maintenance, utilities, furnishings, rent), housing allowances and personal living expenses (goods or services for personal use) regardless of whether reported as taxable income to the employees (2 CFR 200.445).
( iv ) Organization costs (2 CFR 200.455).
( 2 ) In addition, no person providing consultant services in an employer-employee type of relationship shall receive funds. In no event, however, shall such compensation exceed the equivalent of the daily rate paid for Level IV of the Executive Schedule. The Executive Pay Schedule may be obtained by *https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages .*
[80 FR 75945, Dec. 7, 2015]
#### § 14.140 Awards against other agencies.

If an applicant is entitled to an award because it prevails over another agency of the United States that participates in a proceeding before the Department and takes a position that is not substantially justified, the award or an appropriate portion of the award shall be made against that agency.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4415 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain undyed 

polyacrylonitrile staple. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain 

undyed polyacrylonitrile staple. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNDYED POLYACRYLONITRILE STA4 PLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.31 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain undyed polyacrylonitrile staple) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4415 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §5714a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5714a was editorially reclassified as section 11271 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2518 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2518

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit disclosure 
        of Social Security numbers on Medicare-related mailings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

 Mr. Filner (for himself and Mr. Foley) introduced the following bill; 
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition 
      to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit disclosure 
        of Social Security numbers on Medicare-related mailings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Theft of Our Social 
Security Numbers Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF DISCLOSURE OF SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS ON 
              MEDICARE-RELATED MAILINGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1874 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395kk) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) In any case in which an individual's identifying number 
for purposes of this title is the social security account number issued 
to such individual for purposes of section 205(c)(2)(A), no officer or 
employee of the Department of Health and Human Services may include 
such number--
            ``(A) as part of any medicare-related mailing to any 
        person, including the mailing of any medicare card that 
        contains such number; or
            ``(B) as part of the contents of any tax-related mailing to 
        any person unless--
                    ``(i) the contents are in an envelope (or other 
                appropriate wrapper) which is sealed; and
                    ``(ii) such number may not be viewed without 
                opening such envelope (or wrapper).
            ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `medicare-
        related mailing' means any mailing related to the 
        administration of this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to mailings made on or after the first day of the first month 
beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27926]



[[Page 76776]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST] ES-052760, Group No. 165, Wisconsin


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Wisconsin.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calender days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin

T. 52 N., R. 4 W.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion 
of the east and south boundaries, a portion of the subdivisional lines; 
the subdivision of sections 26, 27, 28 and 33, in Township 52 North, 
Range 4 West, Fourth Principal Meridian, Wisconsin, and was accepted 
December 14, 2004. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the 
open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of 
information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: December 14, 2004.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 04-27926 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Church et al., Respondents, v City of Geneva, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We have held that the amendment to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law contained in chapter 745 of Laws of 1976 is retroactive *(Rippe v City of Rochester,*57 AD2d 723; see, also, *Nolan v County of Otsego,*55 AD2d 422; *Matter of Smalls v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*55 AD2d 537; contra *Matter of Pauletti v Freeport Union Free School Dist. No. 9,*59 AD2d 556) and under the provisions of that amendment the facts before Special Term clearly supported its order permitting the filing of a late notice of claim. (Appeal from order of Wayne Supreme Court—late notice of claim.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Cardamone, Simons and Dillon, JJ.
#### § 92.30 Acknowledgment defined.

An acknowledgment is a proceeding by which a person who has executed an instrument goes before a competent officer or court and declares it to be his act and deed to entitle it to be recorded or to be received in evidence without further proof of execution. An acknowledgment is almost never made under oath and should not be confused with an oath (see § 92.18(a) for definition of oath). Moreover, an acknowledgment is not the same as an attestation, the latter being the act of witnessing the execution of an instrument and then signing it as a witness. Instruments requiring acknowledgment generally are those relating to land, such as deeds, mortgages, leases, contracts for the sale of land, and so on.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Wiletha Harge, Respondent, v. Leonard Bell *&*Son et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which found claimant to be widow of deceased employee. The marriage between the claimant and decedent took place in 1952 and the parties lived together until January, 1958, when the claimant separated from her husband because he would get drunk almost every weekend and come home and beat her. There was no decree or agreement as to the separation and albeit the decedent had sought a reconciliation, the claimant had refused to return and live with him. At the time of the compensation hearing the claimant was pregnant as the result of illicit relations with another man which had occurred during the lifetime of her husband. The board determined claimant had not abandoned her husband within the meaning of subdivision 1-a of section 16 of the law but found she was justified in separating from him. The pertinent part of the above section reads as follows: “ the term surviving wife shall be deemed to mean the legal wife of the deceased but shall not include a wife who has abandoned the deceased, and (3) the term abandoned shall be deemed to mean such an abandonment as would be sufficient under section eleven hundred sixty-one of the civil practice act to sustain a judgment of separation on that ground.” The board has factually determined that there was justification for the claimant leaving decedent and although it appears she did not intend to return to him, that there was no abandonment. The acceptance or rejection of this testimony goes to the credibility of the witness, which determination is solely within the province of the board. Whether there was an abandonment under the facts was likewise a question for the board and with its factual determination we will not interfere. It should be noted the appellants offered no evidence as to any of the factual issues. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board.
#### Castlen *v.*Stafford.

July 11, 1912.

Hill, J.

There was no abuse of discretion in granting a first new trial in this case. Civil Code, § 6204.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*420Money rule. Before Judge Daniel. Upson superior court. December 18, 1911.

*Robert L.*Berner, for plaintiff in error.

*Charles J. Lester*and *Persons &*Persons, contra.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121443) of our report, datedMarch 23, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements of InterlineBrands, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, appearing in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Interline Brands, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2004.

 

*DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP*

 

Jacksonville, FloridaMarch 30, 2005

 

----
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

October 29, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Aerial Cartographics of America, Inc. Exemption 

Request Under Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), 49 

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Aerial Cartographics of America, Inc.(ACA) an 

operator of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) equipped to conduct full service 

photography and videography, seeks exemption from the following listed Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the previously approved DJI 

Phantom, DJI S1000 plus, Pulse Vapor 35, Pulse Vapor 55 within the National Airspace 

System (NAS) for controlled, low-risk, aerial video and photography, aerial mapping and 

survey, site specific highway Lidar mapping and ortho image mapping, as well as 

powerline corridor and bridge inspections over certain areas of the United States, 

conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein, or as may be established by 

the FAA, as required by Section 333 requirements. 

ACA in the accompanying petition, seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R.

§§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2),and 91.417(a) and (b). 

ACA has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition because it 

would not set any precedent and because the relief requested is identical to numerous 

exemptions granted previously by the FAA. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87. 

In addition, ACA will be utilizing the same proven airframes and technologies the FAA

has already accepted and approved in numerous previously approved exemptions. 

Combined, their comprehensive Section 333 Exemption and the approvals the FAA has 

already given to their chosen products and the technology, should provide the support 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547 

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

necessary to the FAA for a Summary Grant of ACA’s Section 333 Petition and expedite 

the process. 

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.