alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5189g. Unified Federal review

#### (a) In general

Not later than 18 months after January 29, 2013, and in consultation with the Council on Environmental Quality and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the President shall establish an expedited and unified interagency review process to ensure compliance with environmental and historic requirements under Federal law relating to disaster recovery projects, in order to expedite the recovery process, consistent with applicable law.

#### (b) Contents

The review process established under this section shall include mechanisms to expeditiously address delays that may occur during the recovery from a major disaster and be updated, as appropriate, consistent with applicable law.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §429, as added Pub. L. 113–2, div. B, §1106, Jan. 29, 2013, 127 Stat. 45.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Unified Federal Environmental and Historic Preservation Review

Pub. L. 115–254, div. D, §1220, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3453, provided that:

"(a) Review and Analysis.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 5, 2018], the Administrator [of the Federal Emergency Management Agency] shall review the Unified Federal Environmental and Historic Preservation review process established pursuant to section 429 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5189g), and submit a report to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate that includes the following:

"(1) An analysis of whether and how the unified process has expedited the interagency review process to ensure compliance with the environmental and historic requirements under Federal law relating to disaster recovery projects.

"(2) A survey and analysis of categorical exclusions used by other Federal agencies that may be applicable to any activity related to a major disaster or emergency declared by the President under section 401 or 501, respectively, of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170, 5191).

"(3) Recommendations on any further actions, including any legislative proposals, needed to expedite and streamline the review process.

"(b) Regulations.—After completing the review, survey, and analyses under subsection (a), but not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and after providing notice and opportunity for public comment, the Administrator shall issue regulations to implement any regulatory recommendations, including any categorical exclusions identified under subsection (a), to the extent that the categorical exclusions meet the criteria for a categorical exclusion under section 1508.4 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, and section II of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01."
§ 1000.246 How must HUD respond to a request for waiver of the requirement for a cooperation agreement and a tax exemption? ( a ) HUD shall make a determination to such request for a waiver within 30 days of receipt or provide a reason to the requestor for the delay, identify all additional documentation necessary, and provide a timeline within which a determination will be made.
( b ) If the waiver is granted, HUD shall notify the recipient of the waiver in writing and inform the recipient of any special condition or deadlines with which it must comply. Such waiver shall remain effective until revoked by the Secretary.
( c ) If the waiver is denied, HUD shall notify the recipient of the denial and the reason for the denial in writing. If the request is denied, IHBG funds may not be spent on the housing units. If IHBG funds have been spent on the housing units prior to the denial, the recipient must reimburse the grant for all IHBG funds expended.
[77 FR 71527, Dec. 3, 2012]
Exhibit 23.1

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

​

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:           
|  | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-259513) pertaining to the 2019 Trinity Capital Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan and Trinity Capital Inc. 2019 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of Trinity Capital Inc.; |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | Registration Statement (Form N-2 No. 333-261782) of Trinity Capital Inc. and in the related Prospectus |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

​

of our report dated March 3, 2022, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Trinity Capital Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Trinity Capital Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2021.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California 

March 3, 2022

​

----
§ 1006.345 Labor standards. ( a ) *Davis-Bacon wage rates.* ( 1 ) As described in section 805(b) of the Act, contracts and agreements for assistance, sale or lease under this part must require prevailing wage rates determined by the Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5) to be paid to laborers and mechanics employed in the development of affordable housing.
( 2 ) When NHHBG assistance is only used to assist homebuyers to acquire single family housing, the Davis-Bacon wage rates apply to the construction of the housing if there is a written agreement with the owner or developer of the housing that NHHBG assistance will be used to assist homebuyers to buy the housing.
( 3 ) Prime contracts not in excess of $2000 are exempt from Davis-Bacon wage rates.
( b ) *HUD-determined wage rates.* Section 805(b) of the Act also mandates that contracts and agreements for assistance, sale or lease under the Act require that prevailing wages determined or adopted (subsequent to a determination under applicable State or local law) by HUD shall be paid to maintenance laborers and mechanics employed in the operation, and to architects, technical engineers, draftsmen and technicians employed in the development, of affordable housing.
( c ) *Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act.* Contracts in excess of $100,000 to which Davis-Bacon or HUD-determined wage rates apply are subject by law to the overtime provisions of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327).
( d ) *Volunteers.* The requirements in 24 CFR part 70 concerning exemptions for the use of volunteers on projects subject to Davis-Bacon and HUD-determined wage rates are applicable.
( e ) *Other laws and issuances.* The DHHL, contractors, subcontractors, and other participants must comply with regulations issued under the labor standards provisions cited in this section, and other applicable Federal laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2498

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the tax incentives 

for the use of biodiesel through 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005

Mr. HULSHOF (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. NUSSLE, and Mr. LEWIS of 

Kentucky) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the tax incentives for the use of biodiesel through 2010.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TAX INCENTIVES FOR THE USE 

4 OF BIODIESEL. 

5 (a) CREDIT FOR BIODIESEL USED AS A FUEL.—Sub6 section (e) of section 40A of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 (relating to termination) is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 
2

•HR 2498 IH 

1 (b) BIODIESEL MIXTURE CREDIT.—Paragraph (6) of 

2 section 6426(c) of such Code (relating to termination) is 

3 amended by striking ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

4 (c) BIODIESEL USED TO PRODUCE BIODIESEL MIX5 TURES.—Subparagraph (B) of section 6427(e)(3) of such 

6 Code (relating to termination) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act.

Æ
### §6249a. Implementation

#### (a), (b) Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(21), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2033

#### (c) Legal status regarding other law

Petroleum product and facilities contracted for under this part have the same status as petroleum product and facilities owned by the United States for all purposes associated with the exercise of the laws of any State or political subdivision thereof.

#### (d) Return of product

At such time as the petroleum product contracted for under this part is withdrawn from the Reserve upon the expiration, termination, or other conclusion of the contract, such petroleum product (or the equivalent quantity of petroleum product withdrawn from the Reserve pursuant to the contract) shall be deemed, for purposes of determining the extent to which such product is thereafter subject to any Federal, State, or local law or regulation, not to have left the place where such petroleum product was located at the time it was originally committed to a contract under this part.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §172, as added Pub. L. 101–383, §6(a)(4), Sept. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 730; amended Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(21), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2033.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 106–469 struck out subsecs. (a) and (b) which read as follows:

"(a) Amendment to Plan Not Required.—An amendment of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Plan is not required for any action taken under this part.

"(b) Fill Rate Requirement.—For purposes of section 6240(d)(1) of this title, any petroleum product stored in the Reserve under this part that is removed from the Reserve at the expiration, termination, or other conclusion of the agreement shall be considered to be part of the Reserve until the beginning of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the petroleum product was removed."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1997
<CASH>                                           8,967
<SECURITIES>                                    15,749
<RECEIVABLES>                                  (2,332)
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                        216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   355
<PP&E>                                             986
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (469)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,527
<SALES>                                          6,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,826
<CGS>                                              652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,048
<INCOME-TAX>                                       367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### § 234.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to prescribe the procedures and standard terms and conditions applicable to loan guarantees issued for the benefit of the Borrower, pursuant to the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act of 2014 (Pub. L. 113-95). The loan guarantees will be issued as provided herein pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, dated April 14, 2014, between the United States of America and Ukraine (the “Loan Guarantee Agreement”). The loan guarantee will apply to sums borrowed during a period beginning on the date that the Loan Guarantee Agreement enters into force and ending thirty days after such date, not exceeding an aggregate total of one billion United States Dollars ($1,000,000,000) in principal amount. The loan guarantees shall ensure the Borrower's repayment of 100% of principal and interest due under such borrowings. The full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged for the full payment and performance of such guarantee obligations.
#### In the Matter of Eric Jule C. and Others, Infants. Evelyn G., Appellant; Saint Dominic’s Home, Respondent.

[834 NYS2d 525]

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sara E Schechter, J.), entered on or about March 29, 2006, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the subject children upon a finding that she failed to comply with the terms of a suspended judgment, and committing custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Ser*347vices for the purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Revocation of the suspended judgment and termination of respondent’s parental rights to facilitate adoption of the children by their grandmother is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing respondent’s noncompliance with various aspects of the suspended judgment. Her behavior included dropping out of the aftercare drug program she had been directed to attend, failure to keep the agency informed of her status with that program or enrollment in another drug program, failure to follow through with a random drug testing referral provided by the agency, and use of an illicit drug (see *Matter of Tyshawn Jaraind C.,*36 AD3d 564 [2007]). We have considered respondent’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
#### § 51.72 Transcript and record of the hearing.

A qualified reporter, provided by the Department, will make a complete verbatim transcript of the hearing. The person requesting the hearing or his or her attorney may review and purchase a copy of the transcript directly from the reporter. The hearing transcript and all the information and documents received by the hearing officer, whether or not deemed relevant, will constitute the record of the hearing. The hearing officer's preliminary findings and recommendations are deliberative, and shall not be considered part of the record unless adopted by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Passport Services, or his or her designee.

[83 FR 21875, May 11, 2018]
#### § 1000.521 After the receipt of the recipient's performance report, how long does HUD have to make recommendations under section 404(c) of NAHASDA?

60 days.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK L. RICHARDSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR 

COURT, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

No. 16-15875 

D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00893-MEJ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted April 11, 2017***

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Patrick L. Richardson appeals pro se from the 

district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of coram nobis. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-15875 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s 

dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, United States v. Monreal, 301 F.3d 1127, 1130 

(9th Cir. 2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Richardson’s petition challenging his 

California state conviction for murder because coram nobis relief is not available 

in federal court to attack a state court conviction. See id. at 1131 (“[W]rit of error 

coram nobis . . . may only be brought in the sentencing court.”).

Richardson’s request that this court order the district court to cease 

collecting payments from his prisoner trust account to satisfy the filing fee, set 

forth in his request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 6), is denied. To the 

extent that Richardson requests that this court take judicial notice of the district 

court’s orders in this proceeding (Docket Entry No. 6), that request is denied as 

unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
### §5853. Limitation on legal fee reimbursement

The Department of Energy shall not, except as required under a contract entered into before August 8, 2005, reimburse any contractor or subcontractor of the Department for any legal fees or expenses incurred with respect to a complaint subsequent to—

(1) an adverse determination on the merits with respect to such complaint against the contractor or subcontractor by the Director of the Department of Energy's Office of Hearings and Appeals pursuant to part 708 of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, or by a Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge pursuant to section 5851 of this title; or

(2) an adverse final judgment by any State or Federal court with respect to such complaint against the contractor or subcontractor for wrongful termination or retaliation due to the making of disclosures protected under chapter 12 of title 5, section 5851 of this title, or any comparable State law,

unless the adverse determination or final judgment is reversed upon further administrative or judicial review.

(Pub. L. 93–438, title II, §212, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title VI, §627, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 784.)
§ 96.42 Retention, preservation, and disclosure of adoption records. ( a ) The agency or person retains or archives adoption records in a safe, secure, and retrievable manner for the period of time required by applicable State law.
( b ) The agency or person makes readily available to the adoptee and the adoptive parent(s) upon request all non-identifying information in its custody about the adoptee's health history or background.
( c ) The agency or person ensures that personal data gathered or transmitted in connection with an adoption is used only for the purposes for which the information was gathered and safeguards sensitive individual information.
( d ) The agency or person has a plan that is consistent with the provisions of this section, the plan required under § 96.33, and applicable State law for transferring custody of adoption records that are subject to retention or archival requirements to an appropriate custodian, and ensuring the accessibility of those adoption records, in the event that the agency or person ceases to provide or is no longer permitted to provide adoption services in intercountry adoption cases.
( e ) The agency or person notifies the accrediting entity and the Secretary in writing within thirty days of the time it ceases to provide or is no longer permitted to provide adoption services and provides information about the transfer of its adoption records.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40635, July 14, 2014]
#### Lisa Freihofner, Respondent, v Gregory Freihofner, Appellant.

[831 NYS2d 733]

*467In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a supplemental judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Montagnino, Ct Atty Ref), entered June 5, 2006, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, valued his enhanced earning capacity at the sum of $1,000,000.

Ordered that the supplemental judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Court Attorney Referee (hereinafter the Referee) providently exercised his discretion in valuing the defendant’s enhanced earning capacity which, under the circumstances, constituted a marital asset that was subject to equitable distribution (see *McSparron v McSparron,*87 NY2d 275, 281-282 [1995]; *O’Brien v O’Brien,*66 NY2d 576, 583-589 [1985]), at the sum of $1,000,000. Furthermore, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Referee did not misconstrue the terms of the parties’ stipulation dated June 27, 2003, in valuing the defendant’s enhanced earning capacity (see *Torres v Livorno Rest. Corp.,*221 AD2d 197 [1995]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
# Europeiska unionens L 16I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0820 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | L 016I |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Lagstiftning | 62 årgången18 januari 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0820

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

L 016I

Svensk utgåva

Lagstiftning

62 årgången18 januari 2019

---

| Innehållsförteckning | | Rättelser | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Rättelse till kommissionens genomförandeförordning (EU) 2019/73 av den 17 januari 2019 om införande av en slutgiltig antidumpningstull och slutgiltigt uttag av den provisoriska tull som införts på import av elcyklar med ursprung i Folkrepubliken Kina ( EUT L 16, 18.1.2019 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Rättelser

Sida

*

Rättelse till kommissionens genomförandeförordning (EU) 2019/73 av den 17 januari 2019 om införande av en slutgiltig antidumpningstull och slutgiltigt uttag av den provisoriska tull som införts på import av elcyklar med ursprung i Folkrepubliken Kina ( EUT L 16, 18.1.2019 )

( EUT L 16, 18.1.2019 )

1

| SV | De rättsakter vilkas titlar är tryckta med fin stil är sådana rättsakter som har avseende på den löpande handläggningen av jordbrukspolitiska frågor. De har normalt en begränsad giltighetstid.
  Beträffande alla övriga rättsakter gäller att titlarna är tryckta med fetstil och föregås av en asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

SV

De rättsakter vilkas titlar är tryckta med fin stil är sådana rättsakter som har avseende på den löpande handläggningen av jordbrukspolitiska frågor. De har normalt en begränsad giltighetstid.

Beträffande alla övriga rättsakter gäller att titlarna är tryckta med fetstil och föregås av en asterisk.

---

Rättelser

| 18.1.2019 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | LI 16/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2019

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

LI 16/1

---

Rättelse till kommissionens genomförandeförordning (EU) 2019/73 av den 17 januari 2019 om införande av en slutgiltig antidumpningstull och slutgiltigt uttag av den provisoriska tull som införts på import av elcyklar med ursprung i Folkrepubliken Kina

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning L 16 av den 18 januari 2019
  )

Sidan 135, artikel 4

I stället för:

”Artikel 4

Denna förordning är till alla delar bindande och direkt tillämplig i alla medlemsstater.”

ska det stå:

”Artikel 4

Denna förordning träder i kraft dagen efter det att den har offentliggjorts i Europeiska unionens officiella tidning.”

---
#### § 1000.101 What is affordable housing?

Eligible affordable housing is defined in section 4(2) of NAHASDA and is described in title II of NAHASDA.