1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13088184.4

CASE NO. C08-CV-05113 - 1 -

SCOTT A. KAMBER (pro hac vice)

skamber@kamberedelson.com

DAVID A. STAMPLEY (pro hac vice)

dstampley@kamberedelson.com 

KAMBERLAW, LLC

100 WALL STREET, 23rd Floor

New York, New York 10005

Telephone: (212) 920-3072

Facsimile: (212) 202-6364

JOSEPH H. MALLEY (pro hac vice)

LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH H. MALLEY, P.C.

1045 North Zang Boulevard 

Dallas, Texas 75208

Telephone: (214) 943-6100

Facsimile: (214) 943-6170

DAVID C. PARISI (SBN 162248)

dcparisi@parisihavens.com

SUZANNE HAVENS BECKMAN (SBN 188814)

shavens@parisihavens.com

PARISI & HAVENS LLP

15233 Valleyheart Drive

Sherman Oaks, California 91403

Telephone: (818) 990-1299

Facsimile: (818) 501-7852

ROBERT A. WEIKERT (State Bar No. 121146)

rweikert@nixonpeabody.com

TALLEY E. MCINTYRE (State Bar No. 203131) 

tmcintyre@nixonpeabody.com

NIXON PEABODY LLP

One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor

San Francisco, California 94111-3600

Telephone: (415) 984-8200

Fax: (415) 984-8300

JASON C. KRAVITZ (pro hac vice)

jkravitz@nixonpeabody.com

NIXON PEABODY LLP

100 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02110-2131

Telephone: (617) 345-1000

Fax: (617) 345-1300

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Additional counsel listed on signature pages

Attorneys for Defendant,

NEBUAD, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAN VALENTINE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

NEBUAD, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

No. C08-cv-05113 (TEH)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE 

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson.

Complaint Filed: November 10, 2008

Trial Date: None Set

Case 3:08-cv-05113-TEH Document 211 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13088184.4

CASE NO. C08-CV-05113 - 2 -

 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiffs and Defendant NebuAd, Inc. (“NebuAd”) hereby 

stipulate and agree as follows: 

1. On November 16, 2009, the Court set the further Case Management Conference 

for March 1, 2009. (See DKT. 180). On December 10, 2009, the Parties filed a stipulation and 

proposed order, which was issued by the Court, to continue the hearing for NebuAd’s Motion to 

Dismiss (DKT. 4), also to March 1, 2009. (DKTS. 186,187). 

2. On February 22, 2010, the Parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order, 

which was issued by the Court, to continue the further Case Management Conference and 

NebuAd’s Motion to Dismiss to April 5, 2010. (DKTS. 193, 194). The Parties further stipulated 

(DKT. 195), which was issued by the Court (DKT. 196), that the further Case Management 

Conference and hearing on NebuAd’s Motion to Dismiss (DKT. 4) would be continued to May 

17, 2010. On May 10, 2010, the Parties then filed a joint stipulation and proposed order, which 

was ordered by the Court, to continue the further Case Management Conference and NebuAd’s 

Motion to Dismiss until June 28, 2010. (DKTS. 197, 198). On June 21, 2010, the Parties jointly 

stipulated, which was ordered by the Court, that NebuAd’s Motion to Dismiss be continued until 

after mediation should the mediation be unsuccessful. (DKTS. 201, 202).

3. As requested in the Parties’ Joint Case Management Statement filed on June 21, 

2010 (DKT. 199), at the June 28, 2010 Case Management Conference, the Court referred the case 

to U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero for settlement. (DKT. 206). On July 23, 2010, Judge 

Spero set the Settlement Conference for September 22, 2010. (DKT. 208).

4. In accordance with Court’s instructions at the June 28, 2010 Case Management 

Conference, the Parties hereby request that the further Case Management Conference and hearing 

on NebuAd’s Motion to Dismiss (DKT. 4) shall be continued until after the Settlement 

Conference, should the Parties fail to resolve the case.

5. Should the Parties fail to resolve the case, the Parties agree, within 30 days after 

the close of the Settlement Conference, to request a date for the further Case Management 

Conference and a date to calendar NebuAd’s Motion to Dismiss. 

Case 3:08-cv-05113-TEH Document 211 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13088184.4

CASE NO. C08-CV-05113 - 3 -

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: August 2, 2010 KamberLaw, LLC

By: /s/ David A. Stampley

DAVID A. STAMPLEY

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Nixon Peabody LLP

Dated: August 2, 2010 By: /s/ Talley E. McIntyre

TALLEY E. MCINTYRE

Attorneys for Defendant

NebuAd, Inc.

BRIAN J. PANISH (SBN 116060)

panish@psblaw.com

RAHUL RAVIPUDI (SBN 204519)

ravipudi@psblaw.com

PANISH, SHEA & BOYLE, LLP

11111 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 700

Los Angeles, California 90025

Telephone: (310) 477-1700

Facsimile: (310) 477-1699

Additional Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:08-cv-05113-TEH Document 211 Filed 08/03/10 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE 

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13088184.4

CASE NO. C08-CV-05113 - 4 -

GENERAL ORDER 45 CERTIFICATION

I, David A. Stampley, hereby attest pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45 that the 

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

DATED: August 2, 2010 KamberLaw, LLC 

By: _____/s/ David A. Stampley

DAVID A. STAMPLEY

Attorneys for Defendant 

NebuAd, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________ _____________________________________

Hon. Thelton E. Henderson

United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

08/03/10

Case 3:08-cv-05113-TEH Document 211 Filed 08/03/10 Page 4 of 4