alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 200
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 200 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

§ 200.948 Building product standards and certification program for carpet cushion. ( a ) *Applicable standards.* ( 1 ) All carpet cushion shall be designed, manufactured, and tested in compliance with the following standards from the American Society for Testing and Materials: ( i ) ASTM D 1667-76—(Reapproved 1990) Standard Specification for Flexible Cellular Materials—Vinyl Chloride Polymers and Copolymers (Closed-Cell Foam);
( ii ) ASTM D2646-87—Standard Test Methods for Backing Fabrics;
( iii ) ASTM D629-88—Standard Test Methods for Quantitative Analysis of Textiles;
( iv ) ASTM D3574-91—Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials—Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams;
( v ) ASTM D3676-78—Standard Specification for Rubber Cellular Cushion Used for Carpet or Rug Underlay.
( 2 ) These standards have been approved by the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference. The standards are available from the American Society for Testing Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. These standards are also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) *Labeling.* Under the procedures set forth in § 200.935(d)(6) concerning labeling of a product, the administrator's validation mark, the manufacturer's certification of compliance with the applicable standards, and the type and class all are required to be on the certification label issued by the administrator to the manufacturer.
( c ) *Periodic tests and quality assurance inspection.* Under the procedure set forth in § 200.935(d)(8), testing and inspection shall be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) At least every six months, the administrator shall visit the manufacturer's facility to select a sample of each certified carpet cushion for testing by a laboratory approved by the administrator.
( 2 ) The administrator also shall review the quality assurance procedures every six months to assure that they are being followed by the manufacturer.
[58 FR 67675, Dec. 22, 1993]
**EXHIBIT99.5**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS**

 

Wehereby consent to the use of and reference to our name and our reports, and the inclusion of information derived from our reports,evaluating Vermilion Energy Inc.’s petroleum and natural gas reserves and resources as at December 31, 2014, in this AnnualReport on Form 40-F of Vermilion Energy Inc., and any amendment thereof.

 

Yoursvery truly,

 

*(“GLJPetroleum Consultants Ltd.”)	*

 

GLJPetroleum Consultants Ltd.

4100,400 - 3rd Avenue S.W.,

Calgary,Alberta, Canada T2P 4H2

(403)266-9500 Fax (403) 262-1855

 

March6, 2015
#### § 92.35 Errors in certificate of acknowledgment.

A notarizing officer having taken an acknowledgment of an instrument and made a certificate of that fact cannot afterwards amend or change his certificate for the purpose of correcting a mistake. This can be done only by the parties reacknowledging the instrument. However, typographical errors may be corrected by striking out the erroneous characters and inserting the correct ones above. Such changes should be initiated by the parties who executed the instrument and by the notarizing officer.

[22 FR 10858, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 60 FR 51723, Oct. 3, 1995]
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, William M. McKay,  Chief Financial  Officer of the  Registrant,  certify
that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Emergent Group
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure control and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entitles, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: November 12, 2004                           /s/ William M. McKay
                                                  --------------------
                                                      William M. McKay,
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
§ 14.130 Allowable fees and expenses. ( a ) No award for the fee of an attorney or agent under these rules may exceed $75.00 per hour. However, an award may also include the reasonable expenses of the attorney, agent or witness as a separate item, if the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily charges clients separately for such expenses.
( b ) In determining the reasonableness of the fee sought for an attorney, agent or expert witness, the adjudicative officer shall consider the following: ( 1 ) If the attorney, agent or witness is in private practice, his or her customary fee for similar services, or, if an employee of the applicant, the fully allocated cost of the services;
( 2 ) The prevailing rate for the kind and quality of services furnished in the community in which the attorney, agent or witness ordinarily performs services;
( 3 ) The time actually spent in the representation of the applicant;
( 4 ) The time reasonably spent in the light of the difficulty or complexity of the issues in the proceeding; and
( 5 ) Such other factors as may bear on the value of the services provided.
( c ) The reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter prepared on behalf of a party may be awarded, to the extent that the charge for the services does not exceed the prevailing rate for similar services, and the study or other matter was necessary for preparation of the applicant's case.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN WILLIAMS, J-42019,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 09-0427 CRB (PR)

ORDER REQUESTING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

A recent en banc decision from the Ninth Circuit addressed important issues

relating to federal review of parole decisions in California. See Hayward v. Marshall,

No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). The court

requests that the parties submit supplemental briefs (not to exceed 12 pages in length)

explaining their views on how the Hayward en banc decision applies to this parole

denial habeas case. The court sets the following schedule:

1. Within 10 days of this order, respondent shall send to petitioner a copy

of the Hayward decision. 

2. Within 30 days of this order, respondent shall file with the court and

serve on petitioner a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

3. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file with the court and serve on

respondent a supplemental brief on the impact of Hayward on this action. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 30, 2010 

CHARLES R. BREYER

United States District Judge

G:\PRO-SE\CRB\HC.09\Williams, J1.or1.wpd

Case 3:09-cv-00427-CRB Document 13 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 1000.4 What are the objectives of NAHASDA? The primary objectives of NAHASDA are: ( a ) To assist and promote affordable housing activities to develop, maintain and operate affordable housing in safe and healthy environments on Indian reservations and in other Indian areas for occupancy by low-income Indian families;
( b ) To ensure better access to private mortgage markets for Indian tribes and their members and to promote self-sufficiency of Indian tribes and their members;
( c ) To coordinate activities to provide housing for Indian tribes and their members and to promote self-sufficiency of Indian tribes and their members;
( d ) To plan for and integrate infrastructure resources for Indian tribes with housing development for Indian tribes; and
( e ) To promote the development of private capital markets in Indian country and to allow such markets to operate and grow, thereby benefiting Indian communities.
### §300gg–52. Required coverage for reconstructive surgery following mastectomies

The provisions of section 2706 1 shall apply to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer in the individual market in the same manner as they apply to health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer in connection with a group health plan in the small or large group market.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2752, as added Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title IX, §903(b)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–438.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2706, referred to in text, is a reference to section 2706 of act July 1, 1944. Section 2706, which was classified to section 300gg–6 of this title, was renumbered section 2727 and amended by Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §§1001(2), 1563(c)(5), formerly §1562(c)(5), title X, §10107(b)(1), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, 266, 911, and was transferred to section 300gg–27 of this title. A new section 2706 of act July 1, 1944, related to non-discrimination in health care, was added, effective for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014, by Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1201(4), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 160, and is classified to section 300gg–5 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(f) [title IX, §903(c)(2)], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–337, 2681–438, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (b) [enacting this section] shall apply with respect to health insurance coverage offered, sold, issued, renewed, in effect, or operated in the individual market on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 21, 1998]."

1 See References in Text note below.
### §8422. Compliance report

#### (a) Generally

Any person owning, operating, or proposing to operate one or more existing electric powerplants required to come into compliance with the prohibitions of this chapter shall on or before January 1, 1980, and annually thereafter, submit to the Secretary a report identifying all such existing electric powerplants owned or operated by such person. Such report shall—

(1) set forth the anticipated schedule for compliance with the applicable requirements and prohibitions by each such electric powerplant;

(2) indicate proposed or existing contracts or other commitments or good faith negotiations for such contracts or commitments for coal or another alternate fuel, equipment, or combinations thereof, which would enable such powerplant to comply with such prohibitions; and

(3) identify those electric powerplants, if any, for which application for temporary or permanent exemption from the prohibitions of this chapter may be filed.

#### (b) Report on implementation of section 8484 plan

Any electric utility required to submit a conservation plan under section 8484 of this title shall annually submit to the Secretary a report identifying the steps taken during the preceding year to implement such plan.

(Pub. L. 95–620, title VII, §712, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3332; Pub. L. 97–35, title X, §1023(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 617.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–620, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3289, known as the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8301 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 effective Aug. 13, 1981, see section 1038 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 6240 of this title.
#### § 1000.232 Can an Indian tribe or TDHE amend its IHP?

Yes. Section 103(c) of NAHASDA specifically provides that a recipient may submit modifications or revisions of its IHP to HUD. Unless the initial IHP certification provided by an Indian tribe allowed for the submission of IHP amendments without further tribal certifications, a tribal certification must accompany submission of IHP amendments by a TDHE to HUD. HUD's review of an amendment and determination of compliance will be limited to modifications of an IHP which adds new activities or involve a decrease in the amount of funds provided to protect and maintain the viability of housing assisted under the 1937 Act. HUD will consider these modifications to the IHP in accordance with § 1000.230. HUD will act on amended IHPs within 30 days.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2539 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain cathode-ray tubes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

cathode-ray tubes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CATHODE-RAY TUBES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.85.42 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain cathode-ray tubes) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2539 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### §§ 203.375-203.376 [Reserved]
P.1 

RCRA Box 321 

Prepped by Ryan Dugan 

Document Number: 

204) OGRC-S0006 

Docket Number: 

F-93-OGRC-FFFFF 

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM Sheet 204 of 259 
P.2 

0&RC-S0006 

$ S3 _ ^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY U WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

NOV 6 1990 

OFFICE Of 

SOUO WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 

Honorable Lloyd Bentsen 

United States Senate 

Washington, D.C. 20510 

Dear Senator Bentsen: 

Thank you for your letter of October 1, 1990, expressing 

your concerns about the potential impacts of the Toxicity 

Characteristic (TC) final rule on crude oil production. 

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has only recently 

become aware of the rule's potential impacts on crude oil 

reclamation activities of the type you describe in your letter. 

The Assistant Administrator for the Office of Solid Waste and 

Emergency Response Don Clay has been briefed on this issue and 

has asked us to examine options for dealing with it. EPA is 

working with the Interstate Oil Compact Commission (IOCC) in this 

regard to collect essential data to determine the extent of the 

problem. 

You should be aware that this issue has implications for 

both the TC and the completed regulatory determination with 

respect to the scope of the oil exploration and production 

exemption. The regulatory determination specified that the 

exemption applies to wastes generated on or near the well head 

site. Thus, off-site oil reclamation is not covered under the 

exemption and may, if TC hazardous, be subject to the hazardous 

waste regulations. During the public comment process, EPA did 

not receive any comments with respect to this issue on either the 

regulatory determination or the TC rule. 

Please be assured that EPA is actively working on this issue 

and will do its best to resolve the matter in the very near term. 

Thank you again for your involvement in this issue. I will keep 

you informed as to any action EPA takes to address your concerns. 

Sincerely) yours/" 

Sylvia K.^owrance,-^Director 

Office of Solid Waste 

Printed on Recycled Pjpc
#### § 203.422 Right and liability under Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund.

No mortgagor or mortgagee shall have any vested right in a credit balance in either the General Surplus Account or the Participating Reserve Account. No mortgagor or mortgagee shall be subject to any liability arising under the mutuality of the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund.
§ 203.365 Documents and information to be furnished the Secretary; claims review. ( a ) *Items to be furnished the Secretary.* Within 45 days after the deed is filed for record, in the case of a conveyance claim; or, in the case of a claim arising from a pre-foreclosure sale, within 30 days after the closing of the pre-foreclosure sale, unless extended by the Commissioner, the mortgagee must forward to the Secretary: ( 1 ) A copy of the deed to the Secretary that has been filed for record and the title evidence continued so as to include recordation of the deed; or evidence, as prescribed by the Secretary, of the closing of the pre-foreclosure sale.
( 2 ) Fiscal data pertaining to the mortgage transaction.
( 3 ) Any additional information or data that the Secretary may require.
( b ) *Items to be retained by mortgagee.* The mortgagee must retain all cash amounts, held or deposited for the account of the mortgagor or to which it is entitled under the mortgage transaction, that have not been applied in reduction of the principal mortgage indebtedness.
( c ) *Claim file to be maintained by mortgagee.* ( 1 ) The Secretary may verify the accuracy of information regarding the insurance claim either before payment of the claim or after payment by periodic reviews of the mortgagee's records. Mortgagees must reimburse the Secretary for any claim and interest overpaid because of incorrect, unsupported, or inappropriate information provided by the mortgagee, or because of failure to provide correct information.
( 2 ) Mortgagees must maintain a claim file containing documentation supporting all information submitted for claim payment for at least three years after a claim has been paid. All claim files for claims paid during a period relating to an unresolved or ongoing claim review must be maintained until final resolution of such review. Information to be maintained in the claim file includes receipts covering all disbursements as required by the fiscal data form, ledger cards covering the mortgage transaction, and any additional information or data relevant to the mortgage transaction or insurance claim.
( 3 ) The Secretary may review any claim file at any time during the three-year period after the claim has been paid. Denial of access to any files will be grounds for withdrawal of the mortgagee's approved lender status, debarment by the Secretary, or immediate suspension of all claim payments.
( 4 ) Within 24 hours of a request by the Secretary, a mortgagee must make available for review, or forward to the Secretary, hard copies of identified claim files.
( d ) *Statistical sampling.* HUD may use statistical sampling in selecting claims to be reviewed and in determining the amount due the Secretary because of overpayment.
[57 FR 47972, Oct. 20, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 50144, Sept. 30, 1994]
Amendment No. 3 to the Rewards Network Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Director Awards



  
 Exhibit 10.8

 AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE 
 TO THE 
 REWARDS NETWORK INC. 

2006 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR AWARDS PROGRAM 
 WHEREAS, Rewards Network Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), has heretofore adopted and maintains the Rewards Network Inc. 2006 Non-Employee Director Awards Program (the
“Program”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has retained the power to amend the Program.

 NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 8.3 of the Program, the Program is hereby
amended, effective as of the date hereof, as follows: 
 1. The definition of “Plan” in Article II of the Program is
hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “Plan” means the Corporation’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive
Plan, as the same may be amended from time to time. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this instrument to be
executed by its duly authorized officer on this 16th day of August, 2010. 
  

	
	REWARDS NETWORK INC.
	
	By:    /s/ Ronald L. Blake
	Name: Ronald L. Blake
	Title: President and CEO
#### Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway *v.*Paris.

November 20, 1912.

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Dade superior court. November 20,1911.

*Foust & Payne,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. U. & J. P. Jacoway*and *II. P. LumpJcin,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. In an action of trespass to land alleged to be located in a county of this State contiguous to the State of Tennessee, where the plaintiff’s testimony tends to show that the land is located in Georgia and embraced in her muniments of title conveying land as located in Georgia, and the defendant offers evidence tending to show that the land alleged to be trespassed on is not located in Georgia, but is situated in the State of Tennessee and embraced in a deed to the defendant, in which it is described as situated in the State of Tennessee, it is error for the court to decide the issue of fact and instruct the jury that the plaintiff is entitled to recover.

2. It is erroneous to instruct the jury that they “may believe that witness or those witnesses who have the best means of knowing the facts about which they testify and the least inducement to swear falsely,” without a qualification that the witnesses in all other respects are found to be equally credible. *L. & N. R. Co.*v. *Rogers,*136 *Ga.*674 (71 S. E. 1102).

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur,.*