alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statements of financial position of U.S. Franchise Systems, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 1996.
Common stock and other stockholders' equity include common stock and additional
paid-in capital classified as redeemable common stock in the Company's financial
statements.
The net loss and related per share amounts are based on the losses applicable to
common shareholders which represents the net loss adjusted for accrued dividends
on the redeemable preferred stock.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,777,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  144,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,753,000
<PP&E>                                         516,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,817,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,529,000
<BONDS>                                        731,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       18,037,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,720,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,817,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               864,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,206,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             108,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,913,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,913,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,191,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.58)
        


</TABLE>
§ 96.36 Prohibition on child buying. ( a ) The agency or person prohibits its employees and agents from giving money or other consideration, directly or indirectly, to a child's parent(s), other individual(s), or an entity as payment for the child or as an inducement to release the child. If permitted or required by the child's country of origin, an agency or person may remit reasonable payments for activities related to the adoption proceedings, pre-birth and birth medical costs, the care of the child, the care of the birth mother while pregnant and immediately following birth of the child, or the provision of child welfare and child protection services generally. Permitted or required contributions shall not be remitted as payment for the child or as an inducement to release the child.
( b ) The agency or person has written policies and procedures in place reflecting the prohibitions in paragraph (a) of this section and reinforces them in its employee training programs.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMBUS, INC.

Plaintiff,

 v.

NVIDIA CORPORATION,

Defendant.

and

NVIDIA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

 v.

RAMBUS, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-3343 SI, C 08-5500 SI

ORDER RE: MARCH 12, 2010 CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

At the March 12, 2010 case management conference, counsel shall be prepared to address the

impact on these consolidated cases of the January 22, 2010 ruling by the International Trade

Commission, as well as the status of any further proceedings in the ITC and the U.S. Patent and

Trademark Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03343-SI Document 138 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 92.52 “Deposition on notice” defined.

A *deposition on notice* is a deposition taken before a competent official after reasonable notice has been given in writing by the party or attorney proposing to take such deposition to the opposing party or attorney of record. Notarizing officers, as defined by 22 CFR 92.1, are competent officials for taking depositions on notice in foreign countries (see § 92.51). This method of taking a deposition does not necessarily involve the issuance of a commission or other court order.

[60 FR 51722, Oct. 3, 1995]
#### § 1000.558 Does the Federal Privacy Act apply to recipient records?

The Federal Privacy Act does not apply to recipient records. However, there may be other applicable State and tribal access laws or recipient policies which may apply.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 241

AN ACT

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable cash

contributions for the relief of victims of the Indian Ocean

tsunami.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 241 EH

1 SECTION 1. ACCELERATION OF INCOME TAX BENEFITS FOR

2 CHARITABLE CASH CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RE3 LIEF OF INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI VICTIMS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 170 of the

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986, a taxpayer may treat any

6 contribution described in subsection (b) made in January

7 2005 as if such contribution was made on December 31,

8 2004, and not in January 2005.

9 (b) CONTRIBUTION DESCRIBED.—A contribution is

10 described in this subsection if such contribution is a cash

11 contribution made for the relief of victims in areas af12 fected by the December 26, 2004, Indian Ocean tsunami

13 for which a charitable contribution deduction is allowable

14 under section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Passed the House of Representatives January 6,

2005.

Attest:

Clerk.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 241

AN ACT

To accelerate the income tax benefits for charitable

Indian Ocean tsunami.cash contributions for the relief of victims of the
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,812
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,149
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,720
<INVENTORY>                                     11,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,919
<PP&E>                                          48,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,290
<SALES>                                        147,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,196
<CGS>                                          139,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       596
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,343)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2754 

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to eliminate a limitation 

on benefits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to eliminate 

a limitation on benefits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 3(f)(3) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 

4 1974 (45 U.S.C. 231b(f)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘(ii) 

5 after an annuity has been certified for payment’’ and all 

6 that follows through ‘‘and (iii)’’ and inserting ‘‘and (ii)’’. 

7 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect 

8 to months beginning on or after January 1, 1978. 

Æ
#### § 503.6 Restrictions on some agency records.

Under the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461, as amended), the BBG is prohibited from disseminating within the United States information about the U.S., its people, and its policies when such materials have been prepared by the Agency for audiences abroad. This includes films, radio scripts and tapes, videotapes, books, and similar materials produced by the Agency. However, this law does provide that upon request, such information shall be made available at BBG, for examination only, by representatives of the press, magazines, radio systems and stations, research students or scholars and available, for examination only, to Members of Congress.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2445 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2445

          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on PHBA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

  Mr. Murphy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on PHBA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHBA.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.03 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to PHBA) is amended by striking 
``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2785 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2785

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pantera Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 7, 2005

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Pantera Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PANTERA TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.05.95      (+/-)-              Free         Free             No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         tetrahydrofurfury                                                  31/2008
                         l-(R)-2-[4-(6-
                         chloroquinoxalin-
                         2-yloxy)phenoxy]
                         propanoate (CAS
                         No. 119738-06-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2934.99.15) and
                         any mixtures
                         containing such
                         compound
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.30.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §4370f. Availability of funds after expiration of period for liquidating obligations

For fiscal year 2001 and thereafter, the obligated balances of sums available in multiple-year appropriations accounts shall remain available through the seventh fiscal year after their period of availability has expired for liquidating obligations made during the period of availability.

(Pub. L. 106–377, §1(a)(1) [title III], Oct. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 1441, 1441A–44.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2001, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.
Case 3:08-cv-03907-SI Document 52 Filed 07/13/10 Page 1 of 2
7/9/10

Case 3:08-cv-03907-SI Document 52 Filed 07/13/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 96.55 Performance of Convention communication and coordination functions in outgoing Convention cases. ( a ) The agency or person keeps the Central Authority of the Convention country and the Secretary informed as necessary about the adoption process and the measures taken to complete it, as well as about the progress of the placement if a probationary period is required.
( b ) The agency or person ensures that: ( 1 ) Copies of all documents from the State court proceedings, including the order granting the adoption or legal custody, are provided to the Secretary;
( 2 ) Any additional information on the adoption is transmitted to the Secretary promptly upon request; and
( 3 ) It otherwise facilitates, as requested, the Secretary's ability to provide the certification that the child has been adopted or that custody has been granted for the purpose of adoption, in accordance with the Convention and the IAA.
( c ) Where the transfer of the child does not take place, the agency or person returns the home study on the prospective adoptive parent(s) and/or the child background study to the authorities that forwarded them.
( d ) The agency or person provides to the State court with jurisdiction over the adoption: ( 1 ) Proof that consents have been given as required in § 96.53(c);
( 2 ) An English copy or certified English translation of the home study on the prospective adoptive parent(s) in the Convention country, and the determination by the agency or person that the placement with the prospective adoptive parent(s) is in the child's best interests;
( 3 ) Evidence that the prospective adoptive parent(s) in the Convention country agree to the adoption;
( 4 ) Evidence that the child will be authorized to enter and reside permanently in the Convention country or on the same basis as that of the prospective adoptive parent(s); and
( 5 ) Evidence that the Central Authority of the Convention country has agreed to the adoption, if such consent is necessary under its laws for the adoption to become final.
( e ) The agency or person makes the showing required by § 96.54(b) to the State court with jurisdiction over the adoption.
( f ) The agency or person takes all necessary and appropriate measures to perform any tasks in a Convention adoption case that the Secretary identifies are required to comply with the Convention, the IAA, or any regulations implementing the IAA.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:55:10-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §3221. Brownfields redevelopment report

#### (a) Definition of brownfield site

In this section, the term "brownfield site" has the meaning given the term in section 9601(39) of this title.

#### (b) Report

#### (1) In general

Not later than 1 year after October 27, 2004, the Comptroller General shall prepare a report that evaluates the grants made by the Economic Development Administration for the economic development of brownfield sites.

#### (2) Contents

The report shall—

(A) identify each project conducted during the previous 10-year period in which grant funds have been used for brownfield sites redevelopment activities; and

(B) include for each project a description of—

(i) the type of economic development activities conducted;

(ii) if remediation activities were conducted—

(I) the type of remediation activities; and

(II) the amount of grant money used for those activities in dollars and as a percentage of the total grant award;

(iii) the economic development and environmental standards applied, if applicable;

(iv) the economic development impact of the project;

(v) the role of Federal, State, or local environmental agencies, if any; and

(vi) public participation in the project.

#### (3) Submission of report

The Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a copy of the report.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title VI, §611, as added Pub. L. 108–373, title VI, §603(a), Oct. 27, 2004, 118 Stat. 1769.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3221, Pub. L. 89–136, title VII, §711, Aug. 26, 1965, 79 Stat. 574, related to employment of expediters and administrative employees, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(b)(3), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3617.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76796-76797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28053]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: [69 FR 75360, 
December 16, 2004].

Status: Open meeting.

Place: 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Announcement of Additional Meeting: Additional meeting.
    An Open Meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 22, 2004 at 10 
a.m. in Room 1C30, the William O. Douglas Room.
    Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
December 22, 2004 will be:
    1. The Commission will consider a staff recommendation regarding 
the application of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to certain 
broker-dealers. (See Proposed Rule, IA-1845, and Reopening of Comment 
Period, IA-2278).

[[Page 76797]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Tuleya, Senior Counsel, 
Division of Investment Management, at (202) 942-0719.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: December 17, 2004.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-28053 Filed 12-17-04; 4:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alphonso Davis, Appellant.

Supreme Court, New York County, rendered September 25, 1975, after a jury trial, convicting defendant of possession of a weapon as a felony, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial. Briefly summarized, defendant’s version of the circumstances underlying the charge of which he stands convicted is as follows: One Epps held a grievance against him and produced a pistol in an altercation. Defendant pulled the gun away and it might have discharged. As defendant was retrieving the gun, he was ordered to freeze and apprehended by the police. The People’s version is that defendant threatened Epps with a knife and when the latter defended himself with a chair, defendant produced a gun and shot at Epps. Epps fled, was stopped by the police and informed them of the incident. The police found defendant with the gun in his hand. The jury in its deliberation requested the following information from the trial court: "Is it common practice to test a firearm believed to be connected with a felony only for the ability to fire, or is it routine also to check it for fingerprints and for whether or not it has been recently fired? Is it common practice to check the hands of someone suspected of firing a gun for powder traces?” The trial court in responding to this inquiry erroneously instructed the jury that if the police saw the gun in defendant’s hand there was no *necessity*to have the gun tested for *761fingerprints. There was no evidentiary basis with respect to this instruction insofar as *necessity*was concerned. Further, the instruction has within it the vice that it advises the jury that any possession of the gun by defendant would be a crime for which defendant could be convicted if the jury believed the police that defendant possessed it. The evil lies in the instruction’s exclusion of a temporary, lawful possession of the gun by defendant, a conclusion reachable notwithstanding defendant’s claim that he did not touch the weapon *(People v Hill,*55 AD2d 539; *People v Pendergraft,*50 AD2d 531; *People v Messado,*49 AD2d 560). Similarly, it was error to say to the jury that, because a count against defendant charged possession of a gun, powder traces on defendant’s hands were "not an element here.” Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Evans, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.