alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service 

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability and intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Federally owned invention disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 10/184,005, “Use of Recombinant Bovine CD14 in the Treatment and Prevention of Coliform Mastitis in Dairy Cows”, filed on June 27, 2002, is available for licensing and that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Monsanto Company of St. Louis, Missouri, an exclusive license to this invention. 

# DATES:

                        Comments must be received within ninety (90) calendar days of the date of publication of this Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5989. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights to this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as Monsanto Company of St. Louis, Missouri, has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within ninety (90) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 

Richard J. Brenner, 

Assistant Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 04-28060 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

195) IV-C-162 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:01 AM Sheet 195 of 232 
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

P.2 

MAR 2 1 1989 

E D l 11' "nfi 

MAY " S 1989 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Honorable Lloyd Bentsen 

United States Senator 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Bentsen: 

This is in response to your February 17, 1989 letter to 

Administrator Reilly relaying the concerns of your constituent, 

W. J. Buxton regarding EPA's regulatory proposal to require 

onboard canisters on new vehicles to control refueling 

emissions. To assist you with understanding this matter, I 

have enclosed a copy of our proposal for your review. Section 

E (pages 31177-31182) explains EPA's overall rationale for 

proposing onboard controls. 

In analyzing refueling emission controls, we have 

thoroughly examined the issues related to both onboard and 

Stage II controls, including the question of the phase-in 

period for onboard controls raised by W.J. Buxton's letter. 

While it is true that a substantial time will be required to 

completely phase in such controls, it is also the case that 50 

percent of all gasoline refueling would be controlled within 

the first five years after implementation. In addition, our 

analysis shows that, although in some cases Stage II controls 

can be implemented in a shorter time period than onboard 

controls, the greater overall efficiency of onboard plus the 

other advantages described in the proposal outweigh the 

possible short-term advantage of Stage II controls when viewed 

as a national program. 

Please be assured that we have done our best to carefully 

consider the views represented by W.J. Buxton's letter. If you 

would like further details of our analysis, please contact Mr. 

Philip Carlson of the Standards Development and Support Branch 
P.3 

-2-

from W.J. Buxton in o plac e bot h your letf-Jr I, Comi"ercial 

Enclosure 

c c: Docket A-87-11 

Sincerely yours, 

- - tor --- 0 £ --" esource s
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 05-2854

DR. JOSÉ S. BELAVAL, INC.,

Plaintiff/Appellant,

RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.; CONCILIO DE SALUD

INTEGRAL DE LOIZA, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HON. ROSA PERÉZ-PERDOMO, Secretary, Department of Health of the

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,

Defendant/Appellee,

COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

AND HUMAN SERVICES; MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Secretary, United States

Department of Health and Human Services,

Defendants.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on October 2, 2006 is amended

as follows:

On page 5, line 12, replace the italicized word "that" with

the underlined word "that".

On page 6, line 23, replace the word "1st" with the numeral

"1".

On page 7, line 15, replace "1292(a)" with "1292(a)(1)".

On page 7, line 19, replace "1292(a)" with "1292(a)(1)".

On page 9, line 10, delete one of the two spaces between "884-

85" and "(10th Cir. 1968)".
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-N1\1-279-AD

Costs:Labor per airplane (1 work homes) x $85/hour) Parts per airplane Cost per airplane Number ofu.S.-registered A330 Model airplanes Number ofU.S.-registered A340 Model airplanes Total fleet cost $ $ $ $85



### Q 85 56 

## o

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

DOTRegulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explain NO (X)

YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on asubstantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is itappropliate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                         351,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,375,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (59,620)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,901,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,467,112
<PP&E>                                       6,766,985
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,904,147)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,208,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,594,230
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,570
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,008,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,208,809
<SALES>                                     37,583,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,583,250
<CGS>                                       13,531,943
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,531,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,577,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             633,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,840,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                   760,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,079,402
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,079,402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.20
        

</TABLE>
§ 72.25 Transfer of personal estate to Department of State. ( a ) If no claimant with a legal right to the personal estate comes forward, or if conflicting claims are not resolved, within one year of the date of death, the consular officer should sell or dispose of the personal estate (except for financial instruments, jewelry, heirlooms, and other articles of obvious sentimental value) in the same manner as United States Government-owned foreign excess property under Title IV of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 511 *et seq.*). If, however, a reasonable amount of additional time is likely to permit final settlement of the estate, the consular officer may in his or her discretion postpone the sale for that period of additional time.
( b ) The consular officer should send to the custody of the Department the proceeds of any sale, together with all financial instruments (including bonds, shares of stock and notes of indebtedness), jewelry, heirlooms and other articles of obvious sentimental value, to be held in trust for the legal claimant(s).
( c ) After receipt of a personal estate, the Department may seek payment of all outstanding debts to the estate as they become due, may receive any balances due on such estate, may endorse all checks, bills of exchange, promissory notes, and other instruments of indebtedness payable to the estate for the benefit thereof, and may take such other action as is reasonably necessary for the conservation of the estate.
### §6285. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §301(b)(3), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 683

Section, Pub. L. 94–163, title II, §281, as added Pub. L. 99–58, title I, §104(a), July 2, 1985, 99 Stat. 104; amended Pub. L. 100–373, §1, July 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 878; Pub. L. 101–262, §2(c), Mar. 31, 1990, 104 Stat. 124; Pub. L. 101–360, §2(c), Aug. 10, 1990, 104 Stat. 421; Pub. L. 101–383, §2(3), Sept. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 727; Pub. L. 103–406, title I, §103, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4209; Pub. L. 104–306, §1(4), Oct. 14, 1996, 110 Stat. 3810; Pub. L. 105–177, §1(5), June 1, 1998, 112 Stat. 106; Pub. L. 106–64, §1(3), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 511; Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §104(4), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2033; Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title III, §339(b)(2), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 279, provided for the expiration of all authority under this subchapter at midnight Sept. 30, 2008.
#### Columbia Banking Savings and Loan Association, Appellant, v Central City Land Development Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 3.)

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the memorandum at Special Term, Lynch, J., denying the motion. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—renewal-summary judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Hancock, Jr., Denman and Witmer, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2003D-0497]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Guidance for Industry on Pharmacogenomics Data Submissions” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Karen Nelson, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD  20857, 301-827-1482.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 11, 2004 (69 FR 48876),  the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0557.  The approval expires on December 31, 2007.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: December 17, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-28134 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
#### § 711.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0649

SAT Date: 7/9/2013

Print Date: 9/3/2014

Related cases:

 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: 

2 Health: Incin Pdt ; Eco: 

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 1 1 PMN

3 2 2 Incin Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

LUNG

Incompl Incin Pdt

LIVER

BLOOD

MALE REPRO

ONCO 

IMMUNOSUPPRESS

TERRATOX
Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0649

FATE: MW = 11000 with 0.3% < 500 and 0.99% < 1000

.

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Incin Pdt P3B2

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes, based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is comcern for lung toxicity if inhaled based on lung overload for high 

molecular weight polymers.

 For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for the analogue 

 concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive 

toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL 50 mg/kg, LOAEL 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day 

oral LOAEL 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity 

and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral 

study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive 

toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for 

 Test Data: 

Submitted with the PMN:

Salmonella negative with and without activation;

E.coli negative with and without activation

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*
algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = MW 11,000 with 1% < 1000 and 0.3 % < 500; 

 pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 

mg/L;

high concern for toxicity of incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat
§ 214.21 Termination and renewal provisions. Provisions governing the termination and renewal of advisory committees are contained in section 14 of the Act and paragraph 7 of OMB Circular A-63, as amended. As related to A.I.D.-established non-statutory committees, these provisions mean that: ( a ) Each such committee which was in existence on January 5, 1973, shall terminate by January 5, 1975, unless it is renewed by the A.I.D. Administrator prior to the latter date.
( b ) Each such committee established after January 5, 1973, shall terminate not later than two years after its establishment, unless it is renewed by the A.I.D. Administrator prior to its termination date.
( c ) Any committee which is renewed shall continue for not more than two years unless, prior to the expiration of that period, it is renewed.
( d ) Renewal requires advance approval of the Administrator in accordance with section 5(c) which requires application of the criteria set forth in section 5(b) of the Act; notification to the OMB Secretariat not more than sixty (60) days nor less than thirty (30) days before the expiration date, and concurrence by the Secretariat; publication of a notice of the renewal; and the filing of a new advisory committee charter with the appropriate House and Senate Committees and to the Library of Congress.
( e ) Notification to the OMB Secretariat shall include: ( 1 ) The A.I.D. Administrator's determination that renewal is necessary and is in the public interest;
( 2 ) The reasons for his determination;
( 3 ) The Agency's plan to attain or maintain balanced membership of the committee; and
( 4 ) An explanation of why the committee's functions cannot be performed by the Agency or by an existing advisory committee.
Exhibit 10.7


 


TERMINATION OF THE


ATLANTIC SOUTHERN BANK (f/k/a NEW SOUTHERN BANK)


SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT


DATED DECEMBER 15, 2005


FOR


BRANDON L. MERCER


 


Pursuant
to Section 7.2 of the Salary Continuation Agreement (the “Agreement”) by
and between Atlantic Southern Bank (f/k/a New Southern Bank), a state-chartered
commercial bank located in Macon, Georgia (the “Company”), and Brandon L.
Mercer (the “Executive”), the Company and the Executive hereby agree to
terminate the Agreement.


 


IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Company and the
Executive hereby acknowledge such termination.


 


	
  Executive:

  	
  Bank:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ATLANTIC
  SOUTHERN BANK

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
   

  
	
  Brandon
  L. Mercer

  	
  Title
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John Reynolds, Appellant, v Leon J. Vincent, as Superintendent of the Green Haven Correctional Facility, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered January 8, 1975, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner was arrested on August 14, 1968 and charged with the crime of assault. Upon the death of the victim, the petitioner was charged with manslaughter. On September 27, 1968 a preliminary hearing was held in the Criminal Court, at which the petitioner was represented by counsel and, at the conclusion of the hearing, petitioner was held for action by the Grand Jury. On November 25, 1968 the Grand Jury indicted petitioner for the crime of murder. Although petitioner knew he was being held for action by the Grand Jury, he was not notified of his right to request that he appear before the Grand Jury and no such request was made. The petitioner was found guilty of the crime of murder after a jury trial and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 15 years to life. The judgment of conviction was affirmed, without opinion, by this court and the Court of Appeals *(People v Reynolds,*31 NY2d 723, affg 38 AD2d 892). It should be noted that the petitioner was represented by counsel at all times. Petitioner, having failed to invoke the provisions of former subdivision 2 of section 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in that he made no request to appear before the Grand Jury, acquired no rights under that section (see *People ex rel. Mleczko v McCloskey,*33 Misc 2d 175, affd 16 AD2d 878). Petitioner’s contention that a Grand Jury may not indict for a crime greater than the crime for which he was being held was considered and found to be without merit by this court and the Court of Appeals on his appeals from the judgment of conviction. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.
§ 1003.701 Corrective and remedial action. ( a ) *General.* One or more corrective or remedial actions will be taken by HUD when, on the basis of the performance review, HUD determines that the grantee has not: ( 1 ) Complied with the requirements of the Act, this part, and other applicable laws and regulations, including the environmental responsibilities assumed under section 104(g) of title I of the Act;
( 2 ) Carried out its activities substantially as described in its applications;
( 3 ) Made substantial progress in carrying out its approved program; or
( 4 ) Shown the continuing capacity to carry out its approved activities in a timely manner.
( b ) *Action.* The action taken by HUD will be designed, first, to prevent the continuance of the deficiency; second, to mitigate any adverse effects or consequences of the deficiency; and third, to prevent a recurrence of the same or similar deficiencies. The following actions may be taken singly or in combination, as appropriate for the circumstances: ( 1 ) Request the grantee to submit progress schedules for completing approved activities or for complying with the requirements of this part;
( 2 ) Issue a letter of warning advising the grantee of the deficiency (including environmental review deficiencies and housing assistance deficiencies), describing the corrective actions to be taken, establishing a date for corrective actions, and putting the grantee on notice that more serious actions will be taken if the deficiency is not corrected or is repeated;
( 3 ) Advise the grantee to suspend, discontinue, or not incur costs for the affected activity;
( 4 ) Advise the grantee to reprogram funds from affected activities to other eligible activities, provided that such action shall not be taken in connection with any substantial violation of part 58 and provided that such reprogramming is subjected to the environmental review procedures of part 58 of this title;
( 5 ) Advise the grantee to reimburse the grantee's program account or line of credit in any amount improperly expended;
( 6 ) Change the method of payment from a line of credit basis to a reimbursement basis; and/or
( 7 ) Suspend the line of credit until corrective actions are taken.