23114 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2011–1386; Airspace 

Docket No. 11–ANE–11] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Modification, Revocation and 

Establishment of Air Traffic Service 

Routes; Windsor Locks Area; CT 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final 

rule published in the Federal Register 

on April 5, 2012, that amends the 

airway structure in the vicinity of 

Windsor Locks, CT, due to the planned 

decommissioning of the Bradley VHF 

omnirange/tactical air navigation aid. 

This action corrects the longitude 

coordinate for one point in the 

description of area navigation (RNAV) 

route T–300. 

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, May 31, 

2012. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace, Regulations and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 5, 2012, the FAA published 

a final rule in the Federal Register 

amending four VOR Federal airways, 

revoking one VOR Federal airway, and 

establishing three area navigation 

(RNAV) routes in the vicinity of 

Windsor Locks, CT (77 FR 20528). 

Subsequent to publication, an error was 

discovered in the longitude coordinate 

for the Norwich, CT, VOR/DME 

navigation aid in the description of 

RNAV route T–300. The published 

longitude of 72°59′58′′ W. should read 

71°59′58′′ W. 

Area Navigation Routes are published 

in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 

7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and 

effective September 15, 2011, which is 

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The RNAV route listed in this 

document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

Correction to Final Rule 

■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority 

delegated to me, the longitude 

coordinate for the Norwich, CT VOR/ 

DME as published in the Federal 

Register on April 5, 2010 (77 FR 20528) 

(FR Doc. 2012–8183) for RNAV route 

T–300, is corrected under the 

description as follows: 

Paragraph 6011 United States area 

navigation routes 

* * * * * 

T–300 [Corrected] 

■ On page 20530, line 30, remove 

‘‘Norwich, CT (ORW) VOR/DME (lat. 

41°33′23′′ N., long. 72°59′58′′ W.)’’ and 

insert ‘‘Norwich, CT (ORW) VOR/DME

(lat. 41°33′23′′ N., long. 71°59′58′′ W.) 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 

2012. 

Ellen Crum, 

Acting Manager, Airspace, Regulations and 

ATC Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9187 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 744 

[Docket No. 111027661–1743–01] 

RIN 0694–AF43 

Addition of Certain Persons on the 

Entity List: Addition of Persons Acting 

Contrary to the National Security or 

Foreign Policy Interests of the United 

States 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) by 

adding three persons to the Entity List. 

The persons who are added to the Entity 

List have been determined by the U.S. 

Government to be acting contrary to the 

national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States. These 

persons will be listed on the Entity List 

under the following two destinations: 

Canada and Jordan. 

The Entity List provides notice to the 

public that certain exports, reexports, 

and transfers (in-country) to entities 

identified on the Entity List require a 

license from the Bureau of Industry and 

Security and that availability of license 

exceptions in such transactions is 

limited. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective April 18, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User 

Review Committee, Office of the 

Assistant Secretary, Export 

Administration, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Department of Commerce, 

Phone: (202) 482–5991, Fax: (202) 482– 

3911, Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to 

Part 744) provides notice to the public 

that certain exports, reexports, and 

transfers (in-country) to entities 

identified on the Entity List require a 

license from the Bureau of Industry and 

Security (BIS) and that the availability 

of license exceptions in such 

transactions is limited. Entities are 

placed on the Entity List on the basis of 

certain sections of part 744 (Control 

Policy: End-User and End-Use Based) of 

the EAR. 

The ERC, composed of representatives 

of the Departments of Commerce 

(Chair), State, Defense, Energy and, 

when appropriate, the Treasury, makes 

all decisions regarding additions to, 

removals from or other modifications to 

the Entity List. The ERC makes all 

decisions to add an entry to the Entity 

List by majority vote and all decisions 

to remove or modify an entry by 

unanimous vote. 

ERC Entity List Decisions 

Additions to the Entity List 

This rule implements the decision of 

the ERC to add three persons to the 

Entity List on the basis of Section 

744.11 (License requirements that apply 

to entities acting contrary to the national 

security or foreign policy interests of the 

United States) of the EAR. The three 

entries added to the Entity List consist 

of two persons in Canada and one 

person in Jordan. 

The ERC reviewed Section 744.11(b) 

(Criteria for revising the Entity List) in 

making the determination to add these 

persons to the Entity List. Under that 

paragraph, persons for which there is 

reasonable cause to believe, based on 

specific and articulable facts, that the 

persons have been involved, are 

involved, or pose a significant risk of 

being or becoming involved in, 

activities that are contrary to the 

national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States and those 

acting on behalf of such persons may be 

added to the Entity List pursuant to 

Section 744.11. Paragraphs (b)(1)–(b)(5) 

of Section 744.11 include an illustrative 

list of activities that could be contrary 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 23115 

to the national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States. The three 

persons are believed to have been 

involved in activities described under 

paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(5) of Section 

744.11. 

The three persons in Canada and 

Jordan being added to the Entity List 

under this rule have been determined by 

the ERC to be involved in activities that 

could be contrary to the national 

security or foreign policy interests of the 

United States. Examples of the specific 

activities these persons have been 

involved with that are contrary to the 

national security or foreign policy 

interests of the United States pursuant 

to Section 744.11 include the violation 

of the license requirements imposed for 

exports and reexports to Syria as 

specified in Section 746.9 (formerly 

General Order No. 2 of Supplement No. 

1 to part 736 of the EAR), and violation 

of the embargo against Iran as specified 

in the Iran Transactions Regulations (31 

CFR Part 560). Both Syria and Iran have 

been designated by the Secretary of 

State as countries that have repeatedly 

provided support for acts of 

international terrorism. The three 

persons that are being added to the 

Entity List are knowingly and willfully 

engaging in the transshipment of U.S.- 

origin equipment subject to the EAR, 

without the required Department of 

Commerce or Department of the 

Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control (OFAC) export licenses, for use 

in Syria and Iran. 

For the three persons added to the 

Entity List, the ERC specifies a license 

requirement for all items subject to the 

EAR and establishes a license 

application review policy of a 

presumption of denial. The license 

requirement applies to any transaction 

in which items are to be exported, 

reexported, or transferred (in-country) to 

such persons or in which such persons 

act as purchaser, intermediate 

consignee, ultimate consignee, or enduser. In addition, no license exceptions 

are available for exports, reexports, or 

transfers (in-country) to those persons 

being added to the Entity List. 

This final rule adds the following 

three persons under three entries to the 

Entity List: 

Canada 

(1) Abou El-Khir Al Joundi, a.k.a., the 

following six aliases: 

—Abou El Kheir Joundi; 

—Abou Elkhir Al Joundi; 

—Abou Joundi Et Kheir; 

—Al Joundi; 

—Al Jundi; and 

—Elkheir Aljoundi Abou. 

2706 Carre Denise Pelletier, Montreal, 

Quebec, H4R 2T5 Canada; and 

(2) Canada Lab Instruments, a.k.a., 

the following alias: 

—SCO North America. 

5995 Gouin Ouest, #212, Montreal, 

Quebec, H4J 2P8 Canada. 

Jordan 

(1) Masound Est. for Medical and 

Scientific Supplies, 74 First Floor, Tla’a 

Al Ali Khali Al Salim Street, Amman, 

Jordon 11118. 

Savings Clause 

Shipments of items removed from 

eligibility for a License Exception or 

export or reexport without a license 

(NLR) as a result of this regulatory 

action that were en route aboard a 

carrier to a port of export or reexport, on 

April 18, 2012, pursuant to actual orders 

for export or reexport to a foreign 

destination, may proceed to that 

destination under the previous 

eligibility for a License Exception or 

export or reexport without a license 

(NLR). 

Although the Export Administration 

Act expired on August 20, 2001, the 

President, through Executive Order 

13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 

Comp., p. 783 (2002), as extended by the 

Notice of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 

(August 16, 2011), has continued the 

Export Administration Regulations in 

effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act. 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 

reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, 

and of promoting flexibility. This rule 

has been determined to be not 

significant for purposes of Executive 

Order 12866. 

2. Notwithstanding any other 

provision of law, no person is required 

to respond to nor be subject to a penalty 

for failure to comply with a collection 

of information, subject to the 

requirements of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Control Number. This regulation 

involves collections previously 

approved by the OMB under control 

numbers 0694–0088, ‘‘Multi-Purpose 

Application,’’ which carries a burden 

hour estimate of 43.8 minutes for a 

manual or electronic submission. Total 

burden hours associated with the PRA 

and OMB control number 0694–0088 

are not expected to increase as a result 

of this rule. You may send comments 

regarding the collection of information 

associated with this rule, including 

suggestions for reducing the burden, to 

Jasmeet K. Seehra, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), by 

email to 

Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or by 

fax to (202) 395–7285. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined in Executive Order 

13132. 

4. The provisions of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

553) requiring notice of proposed 

rulemaking, the opportunity for public 

comment and a delay in effective date 

are inapplicable because this regulation 

involves a military or foreign affairs 

function of the United States. (See 5 

U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). BIS implements this 

rule to protect U.S. national security or 

foreign policy interests by preventing 

items from being exported, reexported, 

or transferred (in country) to the persons 

being added to the Entity List. If this 

rule were delayed to allow for notice 

and comment and a delay in effective 

date, then entities being added to the 

Entity List by this action would 

continue to be able to receive items 

without a license and to conduct 

activities contrary to the national 

security or foreign policy interests of the 

United States. In addition, because these 

parties may receive notice of the U.S. 

Government’s intention to place these 

entities on the Entity List once a final 

rule was published it would create an 

incentive for these persons to either 

accelerate receiving items subject to the 

EAR to conduct activities that are 

contrary to the national security or 

foreign policy interests of the United 

States and/or to take steps to set up 

additional aliases, change addresses and 

take other steps to try to limit the 

impact of the listing on the Entity List 

once a final rule was published. Further, 

no other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this rule. Because a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required to be given for this rule by 5 

U.S.C. 553, or by any other law, the 

analytical requirements of the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

23116 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 75 / Wednesday, April 18, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq., are not applicable. 

List of Subject in 15 CFR Part 744 

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Terrorism. 

Accordingly, part 744 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (15 CFR 

parts 730–774) is amended as follows: 

PART 744—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

part 744 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 

42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 

U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 

1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 

3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59 

FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 

12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 

356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 

Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 

CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 

44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 

13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 

786; Notice of August 12, 2011, 76 FR 50661 

(August 16, 2011); Notice of September 21, 

2011, 76 FR 59001 (September, 22, 2011); 

Notice of November 9, 2011, 76 FR 70319 

(November 10, 2011); Notice of January 19, 

2012, 77 FR 3067 (January 20, 2012). 

■ 2. Supplement No. 4 to part 744 is 

amended: 

■ (a) By adding under Canada, in 

alphabetical order, two Canadian 

entities; and 

■ (b) By adding, in alphabetical order, 

the destination of Jordan under the 

Country column and one Jordanian 

entity. 

The additions read as follows: 

SUPPLEMENT NO. 4 TO PART 744—ENTITY LIST

Country Entity License requirement License review policy Federal Register 

citation 

*******

CANADA ...... Abou El-Khir Al Joundi, a.k.a., the following six 

aliases: 

For all items subject to 

the EAR. (See 

§ 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of denial .. 77 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

4/18/12. 

—Abou El Kheir Joundi; 

—Abou Elkhir Al Joundi; 

—Abou Joundi Et Kheir; 

—Al Joundi; 

—Al Jundi; and 

—Elkheir Aljoundi Abou. 

2706 Carre Denise Pelletier, Montreal, Quebec, 

H4R 2T5 Canada.

*******

Canada Lab Instruments, a.k.a., the following 

alias: SCO North America.

For all items subject to 

the EAR. (See 

§ 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of denial .. 77 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

4/18/12. 

5995 Gouin Ouest, #212, Montreal, Quebec, 

H4J 2P8 Canada.

*******

JORDAN ....... Masound Est. for Medical and Scientific Supplies,74 First Floor, Tla’a Al Ali Khali Al Salim 

Street, Amman, Jordon 11118.

For all items subject to 

the EAR. (See 

§ 744.11 of the EAR).

Presumption of denial .. 77 FR [INSERT FR 

PAGE NUMBER] 

4/18/12. 

*******

Dated: April 12, 2012. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9374 Filed 4–17–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

28 CFR Part 16 

[CPCLO Order No. 009–2012] 

Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation 

AGENCY: Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Final Rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ or Department) is issuing a final 

rule for a new Department-wide Privacy 

Act system of records entitled, Debt 

Collection Enforcement System, 

JUSTICE/DOJ–016. The Department is 

exempting the Debt Collection 

Enforcement System, JUSTICE/DOJ– 

016, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k) 

from subsections (c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), 

(2), (3), and (4); (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), (H) 

and (I), (5) and (8); (f) and (g) of the 

Privacy Act for the reasons set forth in 

the following text. Information in this 

system of records relates to matters of 

law enforcement efforts associated with 

debt collection purposes, and certain 

records in this system are exempt from 

certain provisions of the Privacy Act in 

order to avoid interference with such 

law enforcement functions and 

responsibilities of the DOJ. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 18, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Holley B. O’Brien, Director, Debt 

Collection Management Staff, Justice 

Management Division, Department of 

Justice, at (202) 514–5343. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of 

the proposed rule with invitations to 

comment was published on February 

21, 2012, at 77 FR 9878. The 

Department received one comment from 

a member of the public regarding 

exemption from the access provisions of 

the Privacy Act. The Department 

accepted the comment but has declined 

to adopt the comment because the 

system of records is validly exempt from 

the access provisions of the Privacy Act 

for the reasons set forth below. In 

addition, the Department is making 

minor stylistic changes to the authority 

cited for Part 16.134 to reflect only the 

authority for the proposed rule, which 

is 5 U.S.C. 552a. Further, the 

Department is making a minor stylistic 

change to Part 16.134(a) by adding the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES