### 38760 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2012 / Proposed Rules

Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR
111.1. List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111

Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.

Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is proposed to be amended as follows:
**PART 111—[AMENDED]**

1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301– 307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201– 3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632, 3633, and 5001.

2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), as follows: Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM)

* * * * * 700 Special Standards

* * * * * 705 Advanced Preparation and Special Postage Payment Systems

* * * * * 8.0 Preparing Pallets

* * * * * 8.10 Pallet Presort and Labeling

* * * * * 8.10.2 Periodicals—Bundles, Sacks, or Trays

* * * * *

[Revise the introductory paragraph of 8.10.2j as follows:]

j. Origin Mixed ADC (OMX), optional for sacks and trays; allowed with no minimum and required at 100 pounds for bundles of flats. Bundles of flats totaling less than 100 pounds in weight must be sacked if not palletized. Pallet may contain carrier route, automation price, and presorted price mail. Labeling:
* * * * *

[Revise the introductory paragraph and line 1 of 8.10.2k as follows:]

k. Mixed ADC, optional for sacks and trays; allowed with no minimum and required at 100 pounds for bundles of flats. Bundles of flats totaling less than 100 pounds in weight must be sacked if not palletized. Pallet may contain carrier route, automation price, or presorted price mail. Pallets must not contain sacks, trays or bundles that should be properly placed on the origin mixed ADC (OMX) pallet. Labeling:

1. Line 1: ‘‘MXD’’ followed by the city, state, and ZIP Code information for facility serving 3-digit ZIP Code prefix of entry Post Office as shown in L009, Column A.
* * * * *

We will publish an appropriate amendment to 39 CFR part 111 to reflect these changes if the proposal is adopted.
Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice. [FR Doc. 2012–15927 Filed 6–28–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7710–12–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 
**40 CFR Parts 50, 51, 52, 53, and 58**
**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0492; FRL–9693–7]**

**RIN 2060–AO47**
**National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter;**  **Correction**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule; correction.

**SUMMARY :**  In the Proposed Rules section of today’s Federal Register , the EPA is proposing to revise the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter (PM). This action corrects a typographical error in one table contained in the preamble.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Questions concerning the ‘‘National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter’’ proposed rule should be addressed to Ms. Beth Hassett-Sipple, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, (C504–06), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone number (919) 541– 4605, email hassettsipple.beth@epa.gov. Questions related to the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the proposed revisions to the PM NAAQS should be addressed to Ms. Lillian Bradley, U.S. EPA, Office of Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, (C439–02), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone number (919) 541–5694, email bradley.lillian@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In today’s Federal Register , a proposed rule titled, ‘‘National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter,’’ with the same RIN as this correction (RIN 2060–AO47) was published. This correction corrects a typographical error in section X.A, Table 4 of the preamble. This correction will make a change to the summary of the potential costs and benefits of attaining several alternative PM 2.5 standards as presented in the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). In NAAQS rulemaking, the RIA is done for informational purposes only, and the proposed decisions announced in today’s Federal Register are not in any way based on consideration of the information or analyses in the RIA. Specifically, the net benefits presented in Table 4 (3% discount rate) for alternative PM 2.5 standard levels of 11/ 35 mg/m 3 (annual and 24-hour standards) were incorrectly identified as $8,900 to $2300 million in the proposed rule. The correct estimates are $8,900 to $23,000 million. Table 4 is corrected to read as follows:



### TABLE 

### 4—TOTAL 

### C OSTS 

### , M ONETIZED 

### B ENEFITS AND 

### N ET 

### B ENEFITS IN 

### 2020 a 

### (M ILLIONS OF 

### 2006$) b 

### F ULL 

### ATTAINMENT

Alternate PM 2.5 standards (annual/24-hour, in μg/m 3) Total costs Monetized benefits bNet benefits b

3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate 3% Discount rate 7% Discount rate 3% Discount rate c7% Discount rate

13/35 ......................... $2.9 $2.9 $88 to $220 ............. $79 to $200 ............. $85 to $220 ............. $76 to $200 12/35 ......................... 69 69 2,300 to $5,900 ....... 2,100 to $5,400 ....... 2,300 to $5,900 ....... 2,000 to $5,300 11/35 ......................... 270 270 9,200 to $23,000 ..... 8,300 to $21,000 ..... 8,900 to $23,000 ..... 8,000 to $21,000 11/30 ......................... 390 390 14,000 to $36,000 ... 13,000 to $33,000 ... 14,000 to $36,000 ... 13,000 to $33,000

a Values are rounded to two significant figures. Using a 2010$ year increases estimated costs and benefits by approximately 8%.


### 38761 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 126 / Friday, June 29, 2012 / Proposed Rules

b The reduction in premature deaths each year accounts for over 90% of total monetized benefits. Mortality risk valuation assumes discountingover the SAB-recommended 20-year segmented lag structure. Not all possible benefits or disbenefits are quantified and monetized in this analysis. B is the sum of all unquantified benefits. Data limitations prevented us from quantifying these endpoints, and as such, these benefits are inherently more uncertain than those benefits that we were able to quantify.

c Due to data limitations, we were unable to discount compliance costs for all sectors at 3%. As a result, the net benefit calculations at 3% were computed by subtracting the monetized benefits at 3% minus the costs at 7%.

Dated: June 25, 2012. Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation. [FR Doc. 2012–16044 Filed 6–28–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**
**[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–1050; FRL–9690–4]**
**Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;**  **Volatile Organic Compounds; Consumer Products** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  In this action we are proposing to approve into the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) the addition of a new rule that sets volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions limits and other restrictions on consumer products that are sold, supplied, manufactured, or offered for sale in the State.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before July 30, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2010–1050, by one of the following methods:

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to submit
comments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Anthony Maietta, Environmental Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777 maietta.anthony@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

Dated: June 11, 2012. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2012–15689 Filed 6–28–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS**  **COMMISSION**

**47 CFR Part 73**
**[MB Docket No. 11–206; RM–11634; DA 12– 980]** 
**Radio Broadcasting Services; Pike Road, AL** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.
**ACTION :**  Proposal rule; dismissal.

**SUMMARY :**  The Audio Division dismisses the petition for rulemaking filed by Alatron Corporation, Inc., proposing the allotment of Channel 228A at Pike Road, Alabama, as the community’s second local service, and the associated new FM application, File No. 20110504ACT. No comments or counterproposals were received by any parties. Petitioner did not file comments expressing a continuing interest in the proposed Pike Road allotment. It is the Commission’s policy to refrain from making an allotment to a community absent an expression of interest. We will not allot Channel 228A at Pike Road, Alabama.
**ADDRESSES :**  Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2700.
**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Report and Order, MB Docket No. 11–206, adopted June 21, 2012, and released June 22, 2012. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC’s Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY– A257, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractors, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–800–378–3160 or via email www.BCPIWEB.com. This document does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission is not required to submit a copy of this Report and Order to Government Accountability Office, pursuant to the Congressional Review