### NUMBER 13 - 1 8 - 00 167 - C R 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MIGUEL ANGEL HERNAND EZ , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 370 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellee’s motion for supplementation of the record, access to the record as supplemented , and abatement. Appellant filed with the trial court an “Ex parte Motion for Appointment of Expert” and a proposed “Ex parte, Sealed Order Granting Motion for Appointment for Expert.” The clerk’s record contains2

only the captions of these two documents a s they were filed ex parte as sealed

documents. Appellant’s brief was filed on March 7, 2019. One of the issues presented in the

brief is whether the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for the appointment of an expert to assist in the preparation a nd presentation of his defense. A supplemental sealed clerk’s record was filed with the Court on March 21, 2019. Appellee asserts access to the sealed portions of the record are necessary for this Court to have before it a proper record for consideration of the merits of the claim. On March 20, 2019, the trial court granted appellee’s motion for access to sealed portions of the record. Appellee urges that this Court grant access to the unredacted versions of the “Ex parte Motion for Appointment of Expe rt” and proposed “Ex parte, Sealed Order Granting Motion for Appointment for Expert ” , direct the District Clerk of Hidalgo County to prepare and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the unredacted versions, abate the appeal, and grant appellee acc ess to the sealed portions

of the record. The Court, having considered the clerk’s record, appellant’s brief, and the motion, is of the opinion that appellee’s motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, the appeal is

ABATED

. The District Clerk of Hidalgo County is directed to prepare and file with this Court a supplemental clerk’s record containing: a) An unredacted version of “Ex parte Motion for Appointment of Expert” filed by appellant , to be transmitted to the Court sealed; b) An unredacted version of the proposed “Ex parte, Sealed Order Granting3 Motion for Appointment of Expert” filed by appellant, to be transmitted to the Court sealed; c) The “Motion for Access to Sealed Portions of Record” and all exhibits attached thereto, fil ed by the State of Texas; and d) The proposed “Order Granting motion for Access to Sealed Portions of Record” filed by the State of Texas.

The supplemental clerk's record shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within twenty days from the date of this or der. Upon the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record, appellee is GRANTED access to the sealed portions of the record for purposes of addressing appellant’s claims connected with the denial of his “Ex parte Motion for Appointment of Expert.” Counsel i s ordered to maintain the confidentiality of the information contained in this sealed record and is prohibited from distribution or dissemination of the referenced record portions except as specifically authorized by this

order. This appeal shall be rei nstated upon receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record, or upon further order of this Court. Appellee shall have thirty days from the day the supplemental clerk’s record i s filed to file its brief with this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM Do not p ublish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 5 th day of April , 201 9.