alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5189e. Essential service providers

#### (a) Definition

In this section, the term "essential service provider" means an entity that—

(1)(A) provides

(i) wireline or mobile telephone service, Internet access service, radio or television broadcasting, cable service, or direct broadcast satellite service;

(ii) electrical power;

(iii) natural gas;

(iv) water and sewer services; or

(v) any other essential service, as determined by the President; or

(B) is a tower owner or operator;

(2) is—

(A) a municipal entity;

(B) a nonprofit entity; or

(C) a private, for profit entity; and

(3) is contributing to efforts to respond to an emergency or major disaster.

#### (b) Authorization for accessibility

Unless exceptional circumstances apply, in an emergency or major disaster, the head of a Federal agency, to the greatest extent practicable, shall not—

(1) deny or impede access to the disaster site to an essential service provider whose access is necessary to restore and repair an essential service; or

(2) impede the restoration or repair of the services described in subsection (a)(1).

#### (c) Implementation

In implementing this section, the head of a Federal agency shall follow all applicable Federal laws, regulations, and policies.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §427, formerly §425, as added Pub. L. 109–347, title VI, §607, Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 1941; renumbered §427, Pub. L. 113–2, div. B, §1102(1), Jan. 29, 2013, 127 Stat. 39; amended Pub. L. 115–141, div. P, title III, §302, Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1087.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 115–141 designated existing provisions as subpar. (A), redesignated former subpars. (A) to (E) as cls. (i) to (v), respectively, of subpar. (A), substituted "wireline or mobile telephone service, Internet access service, radio or television broadcasting, cable service, or direct broadcast satellite service" for "telecommunications service" in cl. (i), and added subpar. (B).
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: D&R USA Enterprise, Inc.'s v. SCF RC Funding IV, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00891

- CV

Trial court case number: 2021

- 51843 A

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

This is an appeal from the trial court’s August 22, 2022 order granting a severance and transferring several documents, including the July 20, 2022 order of partial summary judgment,

into trial court cause 2021

- 51843A.

On December 6, 2022, appellant D & R USA Enterprise, Inc. (D & R) filed a motion for emergency relief, asking this Court to (1) order the trial court to vacate an oral November 30, 2022 order releasing two bond s to SCF RC Funding IV, LLC (SCF); and (2) “stay all other trial court proceedings pending disposition [of] this appeal.”

As to the alleged oral order of November 30, 2022

, D & R has not provided documentation

of the order to show that it was entered in the trial court cause on appeal in this case , which is trial

court cause 2021

- 51843A.

Although D & R cites to general authority that permits an appellate court to grant stays in accelerated appeals and original proceedings, D & R offers no authority permitting this Court to stay proceedings in a d ifferent trial court cause than the one involved in the appeal

. Accordingly, the motion for emergency relief is denied

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Richard Hightower  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ De cember 13, 2022

_____
EX-10.1



 






Exhibit 10.1




Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors



Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board, on February 2, 2006, the Board
approved the following compensation payable to each non-employee director of the Board in respect
of his service on the Board and/or a committee effective as of January 1, 2006:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer(1)
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lead Director

	$	69,500	 	 	 	 
	All Other Non-Employee Directors

	$	34,500	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Grant of Restricted Stock
or Deferred Stock Credits
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Lead Director

	$	40,000	 	 	 	 
	All Other Non-Employee Directors

	$	40,000	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Committee Chairman Stipend(1)
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee

	$	16,500	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee

	$	13,500	 	 	 	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

	$	13,500	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Stipend for Committee Service

(other than as Chairman)(1)
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee

	$	9,900	 	 	 	 
	Compensation Committee

	$	8,000	 	 	 	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

	$	8,000	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Stock Options(2)

	One–time grant of 7,000
shares upon election to Board
of Directors;

Annual grant of 3,500 shares
thereafter







___________________



(1) Directors’ fees are paid quarterly.




(2) The exercise price for each award is the mean between the highest and lowest sales price of the
Company’s Capital Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the last trading day prior to the date of
the grant.





5
#### § 236.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to prescribe the procedures and standard terms and conditions applicable to loan guarantees issued for the benefit of the Borrower, pursuant to Title III of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. L. 112-74), as applied to FY 2013 funding by section 1706(j) of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6). The loan guarantees will be issued as provided herein pursuant to the Loan Guarantee Agreement, dated June 3, 2014, between the United States of America and the Republic of Tunisia (the “Loan Guarantee Agreement”). The loan guarantee will apply to sums borrowed during a period beginning on the date that the Loan Guarantee Agreement enters into force and ending thirty days after such date, not exceeding an aggregate total of five hundred million United States Dollars ($500,000,000) in principal amount. The loan guarantees shall ensure the Borrower's repayment of 100% of principal and interest due under such loans. The full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged for the full payment and performance of such guarantee obligations.
DESCRIPTION OF THE CHAIRMAN’S AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE 

OF A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 3080, 

THE “TRIBAL EMPLOYMENT AND JOBS PROTECTION ACT” 

Under the Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute, the provisions in H.R. 

3080 relating to the employer shared responsibility requirement apply to months beginning after 

December 31, 2015. 

The following presents the estimated Federal fiscal year budget effects of the Chairman’s 

amendment [1] [2] [3]. 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26

 

-3 -13 -15 -11 -11 -12 -12 -13 -14 -15 -53 -119

 [1] Estimate includes the outlay effects: 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26

 

3 6 9 12 12 12 13 14 14 15 41 110

[2] Estimate includes the following off-budget effects: 

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2017-21 2017-26

 

1 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 17 44

[3] It is estimated that this provision would result in approximately 5,600 employees losing 

employer coverage, of which approximately 2,000 would become uninsured. 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 

June 14, 2016 

JCX-57-16
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the District of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3183

___________

Glenn R. Waite, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District 

Douglas D. Delair; Delair & Delair, * of Nebraska.

*

Appellees. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: February 7, 2001

 Filed: February 13, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Glenn R. Waite appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his legal malpractice action. For the reasons stated in the district court’s

order, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE A. WALKER,

Petitioner,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. ______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

No. C 08-2482 MMC (PR)

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS

On May 15, 2008, petitioner, a California prisoner incarcerated at the Correctional

Training Facility, Soledad, and proceeding pro se, filed the above-titled petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2006 decision by the California

Board of Prison Hearings (“Board”) to deny petitioner parole. Respondent has filed an

answer to the petition and petitioner has filed a traverse.

A recent decision from the Ninth Circuit addresses important issues relating to federal

review of parole decisions. See Hayward v Marshall, No. 06-55392, 2010 WL 1664977 (9th

Cir. April 22, 2010) (en banc). Consequently, the parties will be directed to file

supplemental briefs setting forth their respective views as to the effect, if any, of the

Hayward en banc decision on the Court’s determination of the instant petition.

Case 3:08-cv-02482-MMC Document 9 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Accordingly, the Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule:

1. No later than ten days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall send to

petitioner a copy of the Hayward en banc decision. 

2. No later than twenty days from the date this order is filed, respondent shall file

and serve on petitioner a supplemental brief addressing the impact of Hayward on the instant

action. 

3. No later than twenty days from the date respondent’s supplemental brief is

filed, petitioner shall file and serve on respondent either a supplemental brief addressing the

impact of Hayward on the instant action or a notice that he does not intend to file such a

brief.

4. The parties’ respective supplemental briefs shall not exceed fifteen pages in length.

5. The matter will be deemed submitted on the date petitioner’s supplemental brief is

due. No extensions of time will be granted to file the supplemental briefs absent a showing

of exceptional circumstances. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 20, 2010 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-02482-MMC Document 9 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 2
Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-GC43 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.	Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.	Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and


5.	All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; Situs Holdings, LLC; Computershare Trust Company, National Association;  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:	March 31, 2023

/s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)



CGCMT 2019-GC43 Certifications

---
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fleetclean Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Kenneth A. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Fleetclean Systems, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2004

                                         /s/ Kenneth A. Phillips
                                         -----------------------
                                         Kenneth A. Phillips
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                         /s/ Kenneth A. Phillips
                                         -----------------------
                                         Kenneth A. Phillips
                                         Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL STEPANIAN

Attorney at Law (CSBN 037712)

819 Eddy Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

Telephone: (415) 771-6174

Facsimile: (415) 474-3748

RICHARD PETERSEN

Attorney at Law (CSBN 41012)

P.O. Box 1526

Ukiah, CA 95482

Telephone: (707) 468-5184

Attorneys for Defendant

CARLA BRUMLEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

–ooo–

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CARLA BRUMLEY,

Defendants.

 /

CR. 09-0346-VRW

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

DATE OF SENTENCING

_____________________________

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Michael Stepanian , counsel for

Carla Brumley, and Assistant United States Attorney Tarek Helou, that the sentencing

presently set for January 21, 2010 at 2 p.m. be continued to March 4, 2010 at 2 p.m. 

This continuance is at the request of the defense in order to have sufficient time to

prepare for sentencing.. 

///

///

///

Case 3:09-cr-00346-VRW Document 216 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

U.S. Probation Officer Chris Corruba has no objection to this continuance.

Date: January 11, 2010 /s/ Michael Stepanian MICHAEL STEPANIAN

Counsel for Defendant

Carla Brumley

Date: January 11, 2010 _______/s/_______________ Assistant United States Attorney

Tarek Helou

SO ORDERED:

Date: January 11, 2010 United States District Court Judge

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cr-00346-VRW Document 216 Filed 01/12/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 91.4 Alcoholic liquors on vessels of not over 500 tons. ( a ) Upon request of interested shippers or masters of vessels at ports in the consular district other than the place where the consular office is situated, consular officers shall designate one or more reputable individuals residing in each such port, as authorized persons to witness the signatures of the masters of vessels of not over 500 net tons when affixed to declarations covering shipments of alcoholic liquors destined to the United States, and to issue certificates therefor as contemplated by section 7 of the Anti-Smuggling Act of 1935 (49 Stat. 520; 19 U.S.C. 1707). Any person so designated by a consular officer to issue such certificates shall state in each of his certificates that he has no interest in the shipment described therein. Having delivered the original document to the master, he shall forward the duplicate to the consular office for retention.
( b ) Consular officers shall, with respect to declarations of masters of vessels of not over 500 net tons in instances in which the port of shipment is the same place as, or conveniently near to, the location of the consular office, supply their certifications directly as contemplated by the said section of the Anti-Smuggling Act. They shall retain, over the interval prescribed in the applicable records retirement schedule, a copy of each document so certified by them. They shall similarly retain the copies of the certifications supplied by authorized persons in outlying ports of the consular district, as set forth in the preceding subsection.
( c ) This section, read together with § 4.13, title 19, of the Code of Federal Regulations, comprises the joint regulations contemplated for issuance by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury under section 7 of the Anti-Smuggling Act of 1935.
[32 FR 12588, Aug. 30, 1967]
### §7239. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXI, §3164, Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 946, which related to the whistleblower protection program, was renumbered section 4602 of Pub. L. 107–314, the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, by Pub. L. 108–136, div. C, title XXXI, §3141(i)(3)(A)–(C), Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1776, and is classified to section 2702 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
§ 303.11 Responses to requests. ( a ) *In general.* The Peace Corps, to the extent practicable, will communicate with requesters having access to the internet electronically, such as email or web portal.
( b ) *Acknowledgments of requests.* The Peace Corps will acknowledge the request in writing and assign it an individualized tracking number if it will take longer than 10 working days to process. The Peace Corps will include in the acknowledgment a brief description of the records sought to allow requesters to more easily keep track of their requests.
( c ) *Estimated dates of completion and interim responses.* Upon request, the Peace Corps will provide an estimated date by which the Peace Corps expects to provide a response to the requester. If a request involves a voluminous amount of material, or searches in multiple locations, the Peace Corps may provide interim responses, releasing the records on a rolling basis.
( d ) *Grants of requests.* Once the Peace Corps determines it will grant a request in full or in part, it will notify the requester in writing. The Peace Corps will also inform the requester of any fees charged under § 303.16 and will disclose the requested records to the requester promptly upon payment of any applicable fees. The Peace Corps will inform the requester of the availability of its FOIA Public Liaison to offer assistance.
( e ) *Adverse determinations of requests.* If the Peace Corps makes an adverse determination denying a request in any respect, it will notify the requester of that determination in writing. Adverse determinations, or denials of requests, include decisions that: the requested record is exempt, in whole or in part; the request does not reasonably describe the records sought; the information requested is not a record subject to the FOIA; the requested record does not exist, cannot be located, or has been destroyed; or the requested record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought by the requester. Adverse determinations also include denials involving fees or fee waiver matters or denials of requests for expedited processing.
( f ) *Markings on released documents.* The Peace Corps will release any reasonably segregable portion of a record after redaction of the exempt portions. The amount of information redacted and the exemption under which the redaction is made shall be indicated on the released portion of the record unless doing so would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption. The location of the information redacted will also be indicated on the record, if technically feasible.
( g ) *Use of record exclusions.* ( 1 ) In the event that the Peace Corps identifies records that may be subject to exclusion from the requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), the Peace Corps will confer with Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy (OIP), prior to application of the exclusion.
( 2 ) The Peace Corps, when invoking an exclusion, should document its consultation with OIP.
[89 FR 25525, Apr. 11, 2024]
- 1 – 

STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO SUPPRESS 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED DEFENSE GROUP, LLP 

Eric Chase, CA SBN 148030 

Summer McKeivier, CA SBN 230605 

4181 Sunswept Drive, Ste. 100 

Studio City, CA 91604 

Telephone (818) 487-7400 

Fax (818) 487-7414 

 

Attorneys for Defendant 

ANDREW SAMUEL HANSON 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CASE NO. 3:09-cr-000946-JSW 

 : 

Plaintiff 

 : [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATED 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE MOTION TO SUPPRESS 

v. : 

: 

: HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

ANDREW SAMUEL HANSON, : 

: 

 Defendant. : 

 [PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court finds that an extension of time for Defendant to file his Motion to Suppress 

Evidence two weeks, to March 11, 2010, and for the Government to file any Opposition thereto 

to April 1, 2010, and an exclusion of time for that period, is warranted because the ends of 

justice served by the extension outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a 

speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested extension would 

deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account 

the exercise of due diligence, and would result in a miscarriage of justice. See 18 U.S.C. 

§3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). 

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ ___________________________ 

HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE 

United States District Judge 

Case3:09-cr-00946-JSW Document47-1 Filed02/25/10 Page1 of 2

AS MODIFIED HEREIN

Defendant's reply shall be due on April 8, 2010. The hearing is continued to April 

22, 2010 at 2:30 p.m. February 26, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-00946-JSW Document 48 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 1