alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 96.10 Suspension or cancellation of the designation of an accrediting entity by the Secretary. ( a ) The Secretary will suspend or cancel the designation of an accrediting entity if the Secretary concludes that it is substantially out of compliance with the Convention, the IAA, the UAA, the regulations implementing the IAA or UAA, other applicable laws, or the agreement with the Secretary. Complaints regarding the performance of the accrediting entity may be submitted to the Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs. The Secretary will consider complaints in determining whether an accrediting entity's designation should be suspended or canceled.
( b ) The Secretary will notify an accrediting entity in writing of any deficiencies in the accrediting entity's performance that could lead to the suspension or cancellation of its designation, and will provide the accrediting entity with an opportunity to demonstrate that suspension or cancellation is unwarranted, in accordance with procedures established in the agreement entered into pursuant to § 96.9.
( c ) An accrediting entity may be considered substantially out of compliance under circumstances that include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Failing to act in a timely manner when presented with evidence that an accredited agency or approved person is substantially out of compliance with the standards in subpart F of this part;
( 2 ) Accrediting or approving significant numbers of agencies or persons whose performance results in intervention of the Secretary for the purpose of suspension, cancellation, or debarment;
( 3 ) Failing to perform its responsibilities fairly and objectively;
( 4 ) Violating prohibitions on conflicts of interest;
( 5 ) Failing to meet its reporting requirements;
( 6 ) Failing to protect information or documents that it receives in the course of performing its responsibilities; and
( 7 ) Failing to monitor frequently and carefully the compliance of accredited agencies, and approved persons with the home study requirements of the Convention, section 203(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the IAA (42 U.S.C. 14923(b)(1)(A)(ii)), and § 96.47.
( d ) An accrediting entity that is subject to a final action of suspension or cancellation may petition the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or the United States district court in the judicial district in which the accrediting entity is located to set aside the action as provided in section 204(d) of the IAA (42 U.S.C. 14924(d)).
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40633, July 14, 2014]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Luther Jefferson Holeman, Appellant

No. 06-13-00191-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 115th District Court of 

Upshur County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 15,036). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Luther Jefferson Holeman, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 4, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 305.7 Special circumstances. ( a ) *Couples.* Two Applicants who are married to one another or two unmarried Applicants who are in a same-sex or opposite-sex domestic partnership or other committed relationship are eligible to apply for service as a couple. In the case of an unmarried couple, each member of the couple must provide a sworn statement, in a form acceptable to the Peace Corps, attesting to their domestic partnership status or committed relationship (as the case may be) and their request to be considered for assignment as a couple. In all cases, both members of the couple must apply and qualify for assignment at the same location.
( b ) *Serving with dependents and other family members.* In general, dependents and other family members may not accompany a Volunteer during service. However, the Peace Corps may from time to time make exceptions either on a case-by-case basis or for particular categories of Volunteers to the extent permitted by Federal law.
( c ) *Military service.* The Peace Corps welcomes applications from veterans, reservists, and active duty military personnel who are interested in Peace Corps service after completion of their military service. After receiving an invitation for Peace Corps service, applicants with reserve obligations are reminded to comply with all requirements to notify their reserve component that they will be unavailable for drills and annual training because of their Peace Corps service. Such applicants are urged to obtain written confirmation from their reserve component that they have complied with these requirements.
#### Allan Silverstein et al. v. United Cerebral Palsy Association of Westchester County, Inc.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before August 14, 1962, with notice of argument for the September 1962 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
```

[106th Congress Private Law 6]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl006.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 3097]]

Private Law 106-6
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    For the relief of Akal Security, Incorporated. <<NOTE: Oct. 10, 
                         2000 -  [H.R. 3363]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES PERFORMED BUT NOT PAID.

    Notwithstanding section 2465 of title 10, United States Code, the 
Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the Treasury 
not otherwise appropriated, to Akal Security, Incorporated, a New Mexico 
corporation incorporated in New Mexico, $10,208.74 for security guard 
services rendered in 1991 to the United States Army Reserve Personnel 
Center located at 9700 Page Boulevard in St. Louis, Missouri.

SEC. 2. EXTINGUISHMENT OF LIABILITY.

    Notwithstanding section 2465 of title 10, United States Code, any 
liability of Akal Security, Incorporated, to the United States for 
repayment of $57,771.29 for the services described in section 1 is 
hereby extinguished.

SEC. 3. FULL SATISFACTION.

    The relief under sections 1 and 2 shall, when accepted by or on 
behalf of Akal Security, Incorporated, be in full satisfaction of all 
claims of or on behalf of Akal Security, Incorporated, against the 
United States or against any officer, employee, or agent of the United 
States acting within the scope of employment or agency, for payment for 
the services described in section 1.

SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 percent of the 
amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or received by, any 
agent or attorney for any service rendered in connection with the claim 
described in such section. Any person who violates this section shall be 
guilty of an infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in the amount 
provided in title 18, United States Code.

    Approved October 10, 2000.
```
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2
------------
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tab A. Keplinger, Chief Financial Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Tab A. Keplinger
----------------------------------
Tab A. Keplinger
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2463

STEPHEN D. MELLIN,

Petitioner,

versus

MARINE WORLD-WIDE SERVICES; OFFICE OF WORKERS’

COMPENSATION PROGRAMS,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(98-425-BRB, 97-LHC-187)

Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jean M. McKeen, RUTTER, WALSH, MILLS & RUTTER, L.L.C., Norfolk,

Virginia; Charles Robinowitz, Portland, Oregon, for Petitioner.

Ronald W. Atwood, RONALD W. ATWOOD, P.C., Portland, Oregon, for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen D. Mellin seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of longshore benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986

& Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s

decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

See Mellin v. Marine World-Wide Serv., No. 98-425-BRB; 97-LHC-137

(BRB Nov. 30, 1998; June 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James F. Parkhill, Appellant.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied. On the court’s own motion, the appeal will be heard on a printed record and on appellant’s typewritten brief. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the December Term, commencing November 28, 1960; the appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District Attorney on or before November 23, 1960. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC,

Plaintiff,

v

ROBERT JOE WILLIAMS, et al,

Defendants.

 /

No C 08-5410 VRW

ORDER

On August 11, 2009, the parties filed a notice of

settlement: “the parties * * * have settled all claims * * * in

their entirety.” Doc #5. The parties did not, however, file a

stipulated dismissal and there has been no docket activity for

several months. 

There appearing no good cause for this matter to remain

open, the clerk is directed to close the file and terminate all

pending motions. Any party adversely affected by the closure of

this file may apply to re-open if such application is served and

filed not later than July 30, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05410-VRW Document 16 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00784

- CV

Alfredo Garza , Appellant

v. James Toney and L inda Toney , Appellee s

FROM THE 483RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. 23

- 0861 , THE HONORABLE JOE POOL , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on
December 18, 2023

. On January 9 , 2024 , we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been
filed due to his f ailure to pay or make a rrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by January 1 9 , 2024 . Furthe r, the notice advised
ap p e llant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to
this Court’s notic e, and the clerk’s record has not been f i l ed.
If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court2 may dismiss the appea l for want of prosecution unless the app e l lant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established
that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R

. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has failed to pay or make a r rangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

____________ ______________________________ Edward Smith , Justice
Be fore Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smit h and Theofanis
Dismiss ed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: February 23, 2024
#### Norris, administrator, *v.*Rawlings.

September 24, 1912.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Walker. Washington superior court.. May 25, 1911.

Fish, C. J.

1. Where the petition alleged that the plaintiff as landlord furnished to his tenant, the defendant, given quantities of corn, cottonseed, and fodder, upon the agreement of the defendant to return in kind like quantities of such products at the termination of the tenancy, whenever it should occur, the action based upon such contract, brought within four years after the termination of the tenancy, was not barred by the statute of limitations.

2. The disallowance of an amendment to an answer is not ground for new trial.

3. Admissions, beneficial to the plaintiff and material to his ease, contained in a proffered amendment to the defendant’s answer, were admissible as evidence in behalf of the plaintiff, although the offered amendment was disallowed, and the petition waived discovery. See *Printup*v. *Patton & Jackson,*91 *Ga.*422 (18 S. E. 311); *Alabama etc. Railroad*v. *Guilford,*114 *Ga.*627 (40 S. E. 794), cited in *Mims*v. *Jones,*135 *Ga.*541 (69 S. E. 824).

4. Other assignments of error upon the admissibility of evidence were likewise without merit, and do not require any discussion.

5. The instructions to the jury, to which exceptions were taken, were not erroneous for any reason assigned.

6. The foregoing rulings dispose of all the exceptions insisted upon in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*712*Gross & 8taint,*for plaintiff in error.

*Evans & Evans*and *Hines & Jordan,*contra.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LITTLER MENDELSON

5200 Norl b Palm Avenue

Suit e 302

559.244.7500

Rayma Church, No. 154897

E-Mail: rchurch(o)Jawecs.com

LAW OFFICES OF

EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN,

CHURCH & YOHMAN

2520 WEST SHAW LANE, Suite 102

FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93711-2765

Telephone (559) 432-7641

Facsimile (559) 432-7639

Attorneys for Plaintiff, RODNEY PLATZER

DANIEL J. CRAVENS, Bar No. 207859

E-Mail: dcravens(S),littler.com

KHATEREH SAGE FAHIMI, Bar No. 252152

E-Mail: sfahimi(aHittler.com

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

5200 North Palm Avenue

Suite 302

Fresno, CA 93704.2225

Telephone: 559.244.7500

Facsimile: 559.244.7525

Attorneys for Defendant HENRY SCHEIN, INC

UNITED STATES

NORTHERN DISTE

RODNEY PLATZER,

Plaintiff,

V.

HENRY SCHEIN, INC.,

Defendants.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case No. 3:08-cv-04907-SI

STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON- CASE NO. C08-04907 SI

Case 3:08-cv-04907-RS Document 44 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LITTLER MENDELSON |

A FKgiE»<Qi>l C«r«wrsi

5»aK:tAFil«A<iiii,i

Jtrtl Ml

ffcia».CA W01?m

Ml 111 I»M

WHEREAS the parties to this action have fully and finally resolved all issues set

forth in this case. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action that the

above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between the parties,

through their attorney's of record, that each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs of

suit.

Dated: May 5, 2010

Dated: May 5,2010

RAYMA CHURCH

EMERSON, COREY, SORENSEN,

CHURCH & YOHMAN

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

RODNEY PLATZER

WENS

LITTLER MENDELSON

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Defendant

HENRY SCHEIN, INC.

2.

STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND {PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON - CASE NO. C08-04907 SI

Case 3:08-cv-04907-RS Document 44 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LITTLER MENDELSON

5300 North Palm Avenue

Suite 302

F;esno, CA 93704 3225

559 244 7500

ORDER

In consideration of the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED as follows: THE ABOVE CAPTIONED ACTION IS HEREBY DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE IN ITS ENTIRETY.

Dated UNITED STATES DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Firmwide:95302947.1 052225.1035

3.

STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON - CASE NO. C08-04907 SI

Case 3:08-cv-04907-RS Document 44 Filed 05/05/10 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[WY-920-1320-EL, WYW161763]


Coal Lease Exploration License, WY

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of invitation for coal exploration license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 2(b) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, 
as amended by section 4 of the Federal Coal Leasing Amendments Act of 
1976, 90 Stat. 1083, 30 U.S.C. 201 (b), and to the regulations adopted 
at 43 CFR part 3410, all interested parties are hereby invited to 
participate with Powder River Coal Company on a pro rata cost sharing 
basis in its program for the exploration of coal deposits owned by the 
United States of America in the following-described lands in Campbell 
County, WY:

T. 48 N., R. 71 W., 6th P.M., Wyoming;
Sec. 7: Lot 12;
Sec. 8: Lots 10;
Sec. 17: Lots 1-4, 6-10, 16; Containing 489.43 acres, more or less.

    All of the coal in the above-described land consists of unleased 
Federal coal within the Powder River Basin Known Recoverable Coal 
Resource Area. The purpose of the exploration program is to obtain data 
for the purpose of obtaining structural and quality information needed 
to identify coal reserves that may be used in the Gold Mine Draw 
Alluvial Valley Floor Exchange application that was filed August 15, 
2003, by Powder River Coal Company.

ADDRESSES: The proposed exploration program is fully described and will 
be conducted pursuant to an exploration plan to be approved by the 
Bureau of Land Management. Copies of the exploration plan are available 
for review during normal business hours in the following offices 
(serialized under number WYW161763): Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming 
State Office, 5353 Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY 82003; 
and, Bureau of Land Management, Casper Field Office, 2987 Prospector 
Drive, Casper, WY 82604.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of invitation will be published 
in The News-Record of Gillette, WY, once each week for two consecutive 
weeks beginning the week of November 22, 2004, and in the Federal 
Register. Any party electing to participate in this exploration program 
must send written notice to both the Bureau of Land Management and 
Powder River Coal Company no later than thirty days after publication 
of this invitation in the Federal Register. The written notice should 
be sent to the following addresses: Powder River Coal Company, Attn: 
Les Petersen, P.O. Box 3034, Gillette, WY 82717, and the Bureau of Land 
Management, Wyoming State Office, Branch of Solid Minerals, Attn: Mavis 
Love, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, WY 82003.
    The foregoing is published in the Federal Register pursuant to 43 
CFR 3410.2-1(c)(1).

Phillip C. Perlewitz,
Acting Deputy State Director, Minerals and Lands.
[FR Doc. 04-28150 Filed 12-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
#### § 51.1 Definitions.

The following definitions are applicable to this part:

*Department* means the United States Department of State.

*Electronic passport* means a passport containing an electronically readable device, an electronic chip encoded with the bearer's personal information printed on the data page, a digitized version of the bearer's photograph, a unique chip number, and a digital signature to protect the integrity of the stored information.

*Minor* means an unmarried, unemancipated person under 18 years of age.

*Non-personal services contractor,* for purposes of this part, is an individual working under a non-personal services contract as defined in 48 CFR 37.101.

*Passport* means a travel document regardless of format issued under the authority of the Secretary of State attesting to the identity and nationality of the bearer.

*Passport acceptance agent* means a U.S. national designated by the Department to accept passport applications and to administer oaths and affirmations in connection with such applications.

*Passport agent* means a U.S. citizen employee of the Department of State, including consular officers, diplomatic officers and consular agents abroad, and such U.S. citizen Department of State employees or contractors as the Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs may designate for the purpose of administering oaths and affirmations for passport applications.

*Passport application* means the application form for a United States passport, as prescribed by the Department pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 213 and all documents, photographs, and statements submitted with the form or thereafter in support of the application.

*Passport authorizing officer* means a U.S. citizen employee who is authorized by the Department to approve the issuance of passports.

*Personal services contractor,* for purposes of this part, means a contractor who is working under a personal services contract as described in 48 CFR 37.104.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of State.

*Special issuance passport* means a regular passport for which no passport fee is collected pursuant to § 51.52, and a service, official or diplomatic passport as defined in § 51.3.

*United States* when used in a geographical sense means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and all other United States territories and possessions.

*U.S. citizen* means a person who acquired U.S. citizenship at birth or upon naturalization as provided by law and who has not subsequently lost such citizenship.

*U.S. national* means a U.S. citizen or a U.S. non-citizen national.

*U.S. non-citizen national* means a person on whom U.S. nationality, but not U.S. citizenship, has been conferred at birth under 8 U.S.C. 1408, or under other law or treaty, and who has not subsequently lost such non-citizen nationality.

[72 FR 64931, Nov. 19, 2007; 73 FR 5435, Jan. 30, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 67157, Sept. 30, 2016]
#### § 1007.55 Guarantee fee.

The lender shall pay to HUD, at the time of issuance of the guarantee, a fee for the guarantee of loans under this part, in an amount equal to 1 percent of the principal obligation of the loan. This amount is payable by the borrower at closing.