alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

The Court would like to have a short telephone conference with counsel at 9:00 A.M. ON

MONDAY, APRIL 12, 2010. Plaintiff’s counsel are requested to set up the telephone call and then

contact the Court at 415-522-3684 when all parties are present. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 9, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01936-WHA Document 60 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 1
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## OCT 09 2014 ·
Mr. Bob Koski Director ofQuality Control Kalitta Charters II 843 Willow Run Airport Ypsilanti, MI 48198
Dear Mr. Koski: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

We have received your letter dated May 27, 2014, requesting that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) modify ExemptionNo. 10739, issued onApril2, 2013. This modification (i.e., amendment), ifgranted, would relieve Kalitta Charters II from the requirements of§§ 25.855(a), 25.857(e), and 25.1447(c)(1) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations, and remove several ofthe limitations listed in the original exemption.
Yourrequest was submittedto DocketNo. FAA-2012-1291 (at Regulations.gov) on May 30, 2014. We are in the process ofreviewing your request, and will contact you ifwe need additional information.
In your letter, you requested that the normal public commentprocess be waived since this request would not set a precedent. However, we believe that your request is quite different than any reliefrequested previously. Therefore, a summary ofyour petition will be published inthe Federal Register for public comment, in accordance withthe requirements of§ 11.85. You will be advised ofthe agency's decision on your petition as soon as possible.
Ifyou have any questions or concerns regarding your petition orthe petitionprocess, please contact John Shelden at (425) 227-2785, or by e-mail at John.Shelden@faa.gov. Sincerely,



# f)~~~ Deana M. Stedman Transport Airplane Directorate Aircraft Certification Service
#### § 901.19 Labor organization.

*Labor organization* means any employee organization accorded recognition as the exclusive employee representative under section 1002(11) of the Act. For the Department of State and the Agency for International Development (AID), the exclusive employee representative is the American Foreign Service Association; for the U.S. Information Agency (USIA), the exclusive employee representative is the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1812 (AFL-CIO).
Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 7Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 2 of 7Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 3 of 7Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 4 of 7Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 5 of 7Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 6 of 7Case 3:09-cr-00970-MMC Document 28 Filed 07/15/10 Page 7 of 7
### §4369. Miscellaneous reports

#### (a) Availability to Congressional committees

All reports to or by the Administrator relevant to the Agency's program of research, development, and demonstration shall promptly be made available to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, unless otherwise prohibited by law.

#### (b) Transmittal of jurisdictional information

The Administrator shall keep the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate fully and currently informed with respect to matters falling within or related to the jurisdiction of the committees.

#### (c) Comment by Government agencies and the public

The reports provided for in section 5910 1 of this title shall be made available to the public for comment, and to the heads of affected agencies for comment and, in the case of recommendations for action, for response.

#### (d) Transmittal of research information to the Department of Energy

For the purpose of assisting the Department of Energy in planning and assigning priorities in research development and demonstration activities related to environmental control technologies, the Administrator shall actively make available to the Department all information on research activities and results of research programs of the Environmental Protection Agency.

(Pub. L. 95–477, §5, Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1510; Pub. L. 103–437, §15(c)(6), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4592.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5910 of this title, referred to in subsec. (c), was repealed by Pub. L. 104–66, title II, §2021(i), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 727.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1979, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1994—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 103–437 substituted "Science, Space, and Technology" for "Science and Technology".

1 See References in Text note below.
### §7276c. Miscellaneous provisions

#### (a) Environmental impact statement

The provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.] shall apply to actions of the Administrator implementing sections 7275 to 7276c of this title in the same manner and to the same extent as such provisions apply to other major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.

#### (b) Annual reports

The Administrator shall include in the annual report submitted by the Western Area Power Administration (1) a description of the activities undertaken by the Administrator and by customers under sections 7275 to 7276c of this title and (2) an estimate of the energy savings and renewable resource benefits achieved as a result of such activities.

#### (c) State regulated investor-owned utilities

Any State regulated electric utility (as defined in section 2602(18) of title 16) shall be exempt from the provisions of sections 7275 to 7276c of this title.

#### (d) Rural Electrification Administration requirements

Nothing in sections 7275 to 7276c of this title shall require a customer to take any action inconsistent with a requirement imposed by the Rural Electrification Administration 1

(Pub. L. 98–381, title II, §205, as added Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §114, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2803.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Hoover Power Plant Act of 1984, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
#### § 92.36 Authentication defined.

An authentication is a certification of the genuineness of the official character, *i.e.*, signature and seal, or position of a foreign official. It is an act done with the intention of causing a document which has been executed or issued in one jurisdiction to be recognized in another jurisdiction. Documents which may require authentication include legal instruments notarized by foreign notaries or other officials, and copies of public records, such as birth, death, and marriage certificates, issued by foreign record keepers.
#### Johnson *v.*The State.

June 12, 1912.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Thomas. Fulton superior court. March 4, 1912.

*Thomas B. Brown*and *W. S. Coburn,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas S. Felder, attorney-general, Hugh M. Dorsey, solicitor-general,*and *F. A. Stephens,*contra.

Hill, J.

1. The evidence is amply sufficient to authorize the verdict.

2. The newly discovered evidence is merely cumulative, does not connect the deceased with the transaction, and probably would not change the result were a new trial granted.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tab A.
Keplinger, Chief Financial Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Tab A. Keplinger
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Tab A. Keplinger
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        May 15, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brantley Capital
Corporation and will be retained by Brantley Capital Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 262 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 262

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 
Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 
             dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 
Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 
             dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Early Detection of Dyslexia in 
Children Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION ON IDENTIFICATION 
              AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDERGARTEN 
              THROUGH THIRD GRADE.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of Education, in consultation with the 
National Academy of Sciences, shall conduct a study on methods for 
identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten through 
third grade. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall consider--
            (1) whether there is a biological basis for dyslexia;
            (2) whether dyslexia is caused by--
                    (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that 
                prevents an individual from breaking down written words 
                into component sounds;
                    (B) post-natal experience, including inadequate 
                instruction; or
                    (C) a combination thereof; and
            (3) the cost of implementing a program on a nationwide 
        basis to identify and treat children with dyslexia in 
        kindergarten through third grade.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 120 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall prepare and 
submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study 
conducted under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         324,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,022,204
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (87,643)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,877,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,611,471
<PP&E>                                       4,414,331
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,438,829)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,851,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,837,701
<BONDS>                                      4,250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,670
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,713,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,851,020
<SALES>                                     22,246,695
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,246,695
<CGS>                                        7,444,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,444,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             440,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                917,513
<INCOME-TAX>                                   385,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            532,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                218,699
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   313,458
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
### §7144a. Establishment of security, counterintelligence, and intelligence policies

The Secretary shall be responsible for developing and promulgating the security, counterintelligence, and intelligence policies of the Department. The Secretary may use the immediate staff of the Secretary to assist in developing and promulgating those policies.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title II, §214, as added Pub. L. 106–65, div. C, title XXXII, §3204(a), Oct. 5, 1999, 113 Stat. 955; amended Pub. L. 109–364, div. C, title XXXI, §3117(g), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2508; Pub. L. 116–92, div. E, title LXIV, §6422, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 116–92 struck out subsec. (a) designation and subsecs. (b) and (c), which, respectively, established the Intelligence Executive Committee and provided for budget justification materials.

2006—Pub. L. 109–364 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 5, 1999, see section 3299 of Pub. L. 106–65, set out as a note under section 2401 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LATONE JAMES

(AC 25514)

Lavery, C. J., and Flynn and Dupont, Js.

Argued March 30

officially released May 3, 2005

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESUS LOPEZ,

Petitioner,

 vs.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

Respondent. /

No. C 08-2071 WHA (PR) 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTION FOR STAY

On June 14, 2010, Jesus Lopez’s pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28

U.S.C. 2254 was granted and judgment was entered in his favor. The petition challenged the

2006 decision of the Governor of California denying parole. In the order granting the petition,

respondent was ordered, within twenty days, to calculate a term for petitioner and set an

imminent date for his release in accordance with Section 3041(a) of the California Penal Code. 

On June 18, 2010, respondent filed a motion for a stay of the order of and judgment of June 14,

2010, pending appeal or, alternatively, a temporary stay of the order and judgment to allow

respondent time to seek a stay in the Ninth Circuit. 

Good cause appearing, respondent’s application is GRANTED IN PART. The order and

judgment dated June 14, 2010, are temporarily stayed to permit respondent time to seek a stay

in the Ninth Circuit. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-02071-WHA Document 18 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 1
### §6901a. Congressional findings: used oil recycling

The Congress finds and declares that—

(1) used oil is a valuable source of increasingly scarce energy and materials;

(2) technology exists to re-refine, reprocess, reclaim, and otherwise recycle used oil;

(3) used oil constitutes a threat to public health and the environment when reused or disposed of improperly; and

that, therefore, it is in the national interest to recycle used oil in a manner which does not constitute a threat to public health and the environment and which conserves energy and materials.

(Pub. L. 96–463, §2, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2055.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Used Oil Recycling Act of 1980, and not as part of the Solid Waste Disposal Act which comprises this chapter.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2128
EARL T. SCROGGINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THELMA M. WATSON, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-974) Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeScroggins v. Watson , No. CA-05-974 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Brody Truck Rental, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v Country Wide Insurance Company, Respondent, and Truck Rite Distribution Systems Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[717 NYS2d 43]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael DeMarco, J.), entered on or about March 9, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the motion of defendant Country Wide Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing defendant Truck Rite’s cross claim for consequential damages arising out of the alleged breach of contract, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In claims for breach of contract, a party’s recovery is ordinarily limited to “general damages which are the natural and probable consequence of the breach” *(Kenford Co. v County of Erie,*73 NY2d 312, 319); any additional recovery must be premised upon a showing that the unusual or extraordinary damages sought were “ ‘within the contemplation of the parties *126as the probable result of a breach at the time of or prior to contracting’” *(id.,*quoting *Chapman v Fargo,*223 NY 32, 36; *see also, American List Corp. v U.S. News & World Report,*75 NY2d 38, 42). Here, the insurance policy upon which defendant Truck Rite premises its cross claim for consequential damages merely provides for the indemnification of Truck Rite against liability arising out of the negligent use or operation of its insured motor vehicles; it contains no provision or language indicating that recovery of consequential damages was within the contemplation of the parties *(see, Martin v Metropolitan Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.,*238 AD2d 389, 390; *Sweazey v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.,*169 AD2d 43, 45, *appeal dismissed*78 NY2d 1072), and no factual issue has been otherwise raised as to whether the parties intended that Truck Rite would be able to recover damages due to lost business and/or profits.

We have considered appellant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
### §1974e. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1974e was editorially reclassified as section 20706 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.
#### Dobbs, administrator, *v.*McClure.

August 19, 1912.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Morris. Cherokee superior court. March 1, 1911.

*J. P. Broohe, D. W. Blair,*and *T. B. Latimer,*for plaintiff.

*P. P. DuPre, G. I. Teasley,*and *J. Z. Poster,*for defendant.

Beck, J.

Irrespective of those portions of the evidence the admission of which constitutes the grounds of the special assignments of error, a verdict in favor of the defendant was demanded by the other evidence in the ease, and the court did not err in directing the jury to find such a verdict. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
FLOUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST WORKSHOP

June 20,1996

PROPOSED AGENDA

I. Welcome and Introduction

II. Overview Discussion

III. Review of Agenda Elements

IV. Technical Review of Draft Report

• Engineering Analysis

• Life-cycle Costs and Payback

• Energy Savings

• Utility and Environmental Impacts

• Recommended Actions to Complete Analysis

V. Lunch on Your Own

VI. Voluntary Programs

Market Forces:

• Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP)

• EPA's Green Lights and Energy Star

• Demand-Side Management Programs

• NEMA's Energy Efficiency Council

• Existing Markets

Building Codes - ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1

• System efficiency (watts/sq. ft.)

• Lighting controls

Other Programs

VII. Manufacturer Impacts

VIII. Consumer Impacts

Performance Incompatibilities

• Dimming Ballasts

• 34-watt Energy Saving Lamps

• . Occupancy Sensors

• Interference with Electronic Equipment

IX. Other Issues

X. Wrap-up

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS WORKSHOP JUNE 20, 1996 COMMENT 0E