alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:08-cv-05221-SI

Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

CATHERINE A. CONWAY, SBN 98366

cconway@gibsondunn.com

JULIAN W. POON, SBN 219843

jpoon@gibsondunn.com

JESSE A. CRIPPS, SBN 222285

jcripps@gibsondunn.com

BLAINE H. EVANSON, SBN 254338

bevanson@gibsondunn.com

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197

Telephone: 213.229.7000

Facsimile: 213.229.7520

Attorneys for Defendant

WAL-MART STORES, INC.

LAW OFFICES OF WAGNER & JONES LLP

ANDREW B. JONES, SBN 076915

DANIEL M. KOPFMAN, SBN 192191

1111 East Herndon Avenue, Suite 317

Fresno, CA 93720

Telephone: (559) 449-1800

Facsimile: (559) 449-0749

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES RIDGEWAY, JAIME FAMOSO,

JOSHUA HAROLD, RICHARD BYERS,

DAN THATCHER, NINO PAGTAMA,

WILLIE FRANKLIN, TIM OPITZ, FARRIS

DAY, KARL MERHOFF, and MICHAEL

KROHN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware

corporation d/b/a WAL-MART

TRANSPORTATION LLC, and Does One

through and including Doe Fifty,

Defendants.

[Previously captioned as Bryan et al. v. WalMart Stores, Inc.]

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-05221-SI

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Date: April 3, 2015

Time: 3:00 p.m.

Place: Courtroom 10

Before: Judge Susan Illston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Susan Illston

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 180 Filed 02/25/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:08-cv-05221-SI

Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP

Having sought and obtained permission of the Court, the parties hereby request that the Court

move the case management conference currently scheduled for February 27, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. to

April 3, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. The parties have received the Court’s permission to appear telephonically

for the case management conference.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: February 24, 2015 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

/s/ Jesse A. Cripps

Jesse A. Cripps

Attorney for Defendant

WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Dated: February 24, 2015 WAGNER & JONES LLP

/s/ Nicholas Wagner

Nicholas Wagner

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Attorney Attestation

In accordance with N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the

concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories hereto.

DATED: February 24, 2015 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

/s/ Jesse A. Cripps

Jesse A. Cripps

Attorney for Defendant

WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Case 3:08-cv-05221-SI Document 180 Filed 02/25/15 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Although the stipulation refers to the existing deadline as December 25, 2009, the

deadline was extended, at the parties’ request, to January 31, 2010. (See Order, filed

December 9, 2009.)

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KINGVISION PAY-PER-VIEW, LTD.,

Plaintiff

 v.

HECTOR ANTONIO ORELLANA, et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-09-0219 MMC

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

REFERRING IN PART TO MAGISTRATE

JUDGE LAPORTE STIPULATION TO

CONTINUE SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE AND VARIOUS

DEADLINES

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation to Continue Settlement Conference and

Various Deadlines, filed February 8, 2010. Having read and considered the stipulation, the

Court rules as follows:

1. To the extent the parties seek an order continuing the settlement conference

from February 11, 2010 to March 4, 2010, the stipulation is hereby REFERRED to

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte.

2. To the extent the parties seek an order continuing the non-expert discovery

deadline from January 31, 20101

 to April 1, 2010, the stipulation is hereby DENIED for the

Case 3:09-cv-00219-MMC Document 29 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The sole reason offered by the parties in support of the request is that the parties

engaged in settlement discussions during the first week of February 2010. The parties fail

to explain why discussions occurring after the deadline to complete non-expert discovery

serve to excuse any prior failure to complete non-expert discovery.

2

reason that the parties have failed to show good cause exists for such an extension.2

3. To the extent the parties seek an order continuing the deadlines to designate

experts, to complete expert discovery, and to file dispositive motions, the stipulation is

hereby DENIED, for the reason that the parties fail to address the effect of those proposed

extensions on the remaining pretrial dates, specifically, the May 25, 2010 Pretrial

Conference and the June 7, 2010 trial date. For example, if the Court were to extend the

deadline to file dispositive motions to May 10, 2010, as the parties request, the hearing on

any such motions would be conducted, under the Local Rules of this District, on June 18,

2010, which date is after the first date of the trial.

4. To the extent the parties seek an order continuing the Status Conference from

March 5, 2010 to May 7, 2010, a date only eighteen days before the Pretrial Conference,

the stipulation is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00219-MMC Document 29 Filed 02/10/10 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with the accompanying QuarterlyReport of Bionova Holding Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Jose Manuel Garcia,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   December 2, 2003 |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |
|                                |   | /s/ JOSE MANUEL GARCIA |   |
|                                |   | Jose Manuel Garcia |
|                                |   |  Chief Executive Officer |
|                                     |        |  |  |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 12.1

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Year EndedDecember 30,
2005

December 29,
2006

December 28,
2007

December 26,
2008

December 25,
2009Earnings:Income before income taxes

$
47,134

$
50,680

$
83,422

$
65,458

$
43,161Fixed charges (from below)


31,146


38,901


43,711


39,218


29,600Total earnings

$
78,280

$
89,581

$
127,133

$
104,676

$
72,761Fixed Charges:Interest expense

$
25,419

$
31,367

$
33,923

$
28,482

$
19,044Interest in rent expense estimated at 30% of rent expense


5,727


7,534


9,788


10,736


10,556Total fixed charges(1)

$
31,146

$
38,901

$
43,711

$
39,218

$
29,600Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


2.5


2.3


2.9


2.7


2.5


(1)Preferred
security dividends of Interline New Jersey are excluded from fixed charges as preferred stock is held solely by corporate parent.


---



Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends

Year EndedDecember 30,
2005

December 29,
2006

December 28,
2007

December 26,
2008

December 25,
2009Earnings:Income before income taxes

$
47,134

$
50,680

$
83,422

$
65,458

$
43,161Fixed charges (from below)


31,146


38,901


43,711


39,218


29,600Total earnings

$
78,280

$
89,581

$
127,133

$
104,676

$
72,761Fixed Charges:Interest expense

$
25,419

$
31,367

$
33,923

$
28,482

$
19,044Interest in rent expense estimated at 30% of rent expense


5,727


7,534


9,788


10,736


10,556Total fixed charges(1)

$
31,146

$
38,901

$
43,711

$
39,218

$
29,600Preferred dividends (calculated below)

$


$


$


$


$
Total combined fixed charges and preferred dividends

$
31,146

$
38,901

$
43,711

$
39,218

$
29,600Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends


2.5


2.3


2.9


2.7


2.5Deficiency (Surplus)

$
(47,134
)
$
(50,680
)
$
(83,422
)
$
(65,458
)
$
(43,161
)Preferred Dividends:Preferred dividend amount(1)

$


$


$


$


$
Tax rate


38.9
%

38.5
%

38.9
%

37.6
%

39.6
%Preferred dividends

$


$


$


$


$



(1)Preferred
security dividends of Interline New Jersey are excluded from fixed charges as preferred stock is held solely by corporate parent.


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-04-032]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: January 6, 2005 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1063-1068 (Final) (Certain Frozen or Canned 
Warmwater Shrimp and Prawns from Brazil, China, Ecuador, India, 
Thailand, and Vietnam)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to 
the Secretary of Commerce on or before January 21, 2005.)
    5. Inv. No. 731-TA-1070A (Certain Crepe Paper Products from 
China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary 
of Commerce on or before January 18, 2005.)
    6. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: December 21, 2004.
    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-28326 Filed 12-22-04; 11:17 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 92.28 Signature of affiant on affidavit.

The signature of the affiant is indispensable. The affiant should always sign the affidavit in the presence of the notarizing officer.
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 06-60683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

VERSUS

TONTE DEON WALKER

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi, Gulfport

1:05-CR-94-LG

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs of the

parties and argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district

court did not err in finding that the Mayor of Biloxi declared a

curfew that was in effect at the time the officers stopped the

defendant on the streets of Biloxi. For that reason,the district

court did not err in denying Walker’s motion to suppress.

Accordingly the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 55479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22107]

[[Page 55479]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Application for Final Commitment for a Long-Term Loan or 
Financial Guarantee in Excess of $100 Million: AP088514XX; Withdrawal.

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Notice; Withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is to inform the public of the withdrawal of two 
duplicate notices published on September 11, 2014 at 79 FR 54275 and 
54276. The referenced notice originally published on September 8, 2014 
at 79 FR 53195 remains in effect.

DATES: As of September 16, 2014 the duplicate notices published 
September 11, 2014 at 79 FR 54275 and 54276 are withdrawn.
    Reference: AP088514XX.

Lloyd Ellis,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-22107 Filed 9-12-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
#### In the Matter of Frank J. Luchowski, Appellant, v. James R. Lawley et al., as Commissioners of Election, Respondents.

— Motion granted to prosecute appeal on original record, five typewritten copies of briefs and case added to calendar for argument on October 18, 1960. (Order entered Oct. 18, 1960.)
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . P D - 0276- 08
R O BE R TO Y A R I T T R EJO , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS ON S TATE ’ S PET I TI ON FOR DI S CRETI ON ARY REVI EW FROM THE FOURTEENTH CO URT O F AP PEALS

HA RRI S CO UNTY J OHNS ON , J. , f

i l e d a c onc ur r i ng o pi ni on.
C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N Yet ag ain, we c onsider a c ase in whic h a par ty has conf used “jurisdiction” with “authority .” As the opinion of the Court points out, the trial court had both subject-matter jurisdiction over the offe nse and pe rsonal jurisdiction over a ppellant. In that opinion, the state re ceive s the right answer to the wrongquestion; it appears that the state re ally wants to kn o w wh et h er the trial court ha d authority to do what it did, but asks the question in terms of jurisdiction. As the opinion of the Court states, “the trial court may have err ed in its charg e to the jury .”2

Ha ll v . S ta te , 22 5 S.W
. 3 d 52 4 , 53 5
- 3 6 (T ex. C ri m . A p p . 20 0 7 ). 1 But if the a lleg ed er

ror wa s including the lesser of fense of ag gravated assault in the jury charg e, the question is first whether the indictment authorized the instruction and sec ond, whether the evidenc e supported g iving the instruc tion, not whether the district court has jurisdiction over a f elony offe nse. 1 Ijoi n th e op ini on

of the Court . Filed: April 1, 2009 Pub lis h
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Thomas A. Borner, Chief Executive Officer and Robert J. Halloran, Jr.,
President and Treasurer of PSB Holdings, Inc. (the Company) each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal ended June 30, 2007 and
that to the best of their knowledge:



|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PSB
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by PSB Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |                                       |                               
|----------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------------
|September 21, 2007 Date |  |  |                                       | /s/    THOMAS A. BORNER       
|                        |  |  | Thomas A. Borner                     
|                        |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | 
|September 21, 2007 Date |  |  |                                       | /s/    ROBERT J. HALLORAN,
JR.
|                        |  |  | Robert J. Halloran, Jr.              
|                        |  |  | President and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,393
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,877,953
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    293,383,635
<ALLOWANCE>                                     27,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             305,364,693
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                 4,318,523
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             73,447
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 284,999,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             305,364,693
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,484,652
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                40,904
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,525,556
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,525,556
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   13,520
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                460,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,053,348
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,053,348
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,053,348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                11,627.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    399,868
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                40,333     
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 (26,314)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0  
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               27,539
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
From: "Miller, Jeff" <Jeff_Miller@treated-wood.org> 

To: <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

Cc: Jim Berlow/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, "Bromberg, Kevin L." <kevin.bromberg@sba.gov> 

Date: 07/19/2012 06:01 AM 

Subject: RIN 2060-AR15: Thank you for consideration of issues on NHSM rule 

Ms. Cortney Higgins

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

  

Re:  NSPS and EG:  Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units:  Reconsideration and

Proposed Amendments; Non‐Hazardous Secondary Materials That Are Solid Waste:  Proposed Rule, RIN

2060‐AR15

  

Dear Ms. Higgins:

  

Thank you again for meeting with representatives of the Treated Wood Council on June 11, 2012, to

discuss the above rule.   

  

I have attached a brief review of our concerns and ask you to consider them in your decision‐making.    

Please let me know if you have any questions, or any difficulty opening the attachments.

  

Jeff Miller

___________________________

Jeff Miller

President & Executive Director

Treated Wood Council

1111   19th Street, NW

Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

www.treated‐wood.org

202‐463‐2045

202‐641‐5427 cell

202‐463‐2059 fax

jeff_miller@treated‐wood.org  

  

  

TWC letter to OMB on NHSM rule 7 19 12.pdf 

TWC letter to OMB on NHSM rule 

attachments 7 19 12.pdf
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

JOHN EARL BRAKE,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))))

No. C08-4089 BZ

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING

Having considered the motion of defendant John Earl Brake

for continuance, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on the Motion

For Order of Civil Contempt be continued to Monday, August 9,

2010, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal

Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California

94102, to give Mr. Brake another chance to comply with the

judgment and the Court’s Orders.  If Ms. Moore has been served

with a subpoena, it shall be Mr. Brake’s responsibility to

make sure she appears at the new time.  

Dated: July 27, 2010      

Bernard Zimmerman   United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\SEC V. BRAKE\ORD CONTINUING MOTION HEARING.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04089-BZ   Document 60   Filed 07/27/10   Page 1 of 1
#### § 14.345 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit a copy of the final decision granting the award to: Director, Office of Finance and Accounting, Room 2202, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410, with a copy to: Associate General Counsel for Equal Opportunity and Administrative Law, Room 10244, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC 20410. A statement that review of the underlying decision is not being sought in the United States courts, or that the process for seeking review of the award, if initiated, has been completed, must also be included. The agency will pay the amount awarded to the applicant within 60 days, unless judicial review of the award or of the underlying decision of the adversary adjudication has been sought by the applicant or any other party to the proceeding.
#### § 51.41 Documentary evidence.

The applicant must provide documentary evidence that he or she is a U.S. citizen or non-citizen national.