alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER EXCL. TIME

Case No. CR 09-102

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

TAREK J. HELOU (CABN 218225)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7200

Fax: (415) 436-7234

E-Mail: Tarek.J.Helou@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

TENIAH TERCERO,

a/k/a TIA

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-102 VRW

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING

TIME FROM FEBRUARY 4, 2010

THROUGH FEBRUARY 25, 2010

The defendant, Teniah Tercero, represented by Mark Rosenbush, and the government,

represented by Tarek J. Helou, appeared before the Court on February 4, 2010 for a status

hearing. The parties represented that they were discussing a disposition of the case. Defense

counsel requested a continuance of the matter.

The matter was continued to February 25, 2010 for a change of plea hearing or to set

further proceedings. Counsel for the defendant requested that time be excluded under the

Speedy Trial Act from February 4, 2010 through February 25, 2010 because he needed the

remaining period of time to review the discovery, to conduct necessary investigation, and to

Case 3:09-cr-00102-RS Document 43 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER EXCL. TIME

Case No. CR 09-102 -2-

consider whether a pre-trial disposition of the case was in his client’s best interest. The

government stated that it had no objection to excluding time.

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that

failing to exclude the time from February 4, 2010 through February 25, 2010 would

unreasonably deny the defendant and her counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). 

The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from February 4,

2010 through February 25, 2010 from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best

interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the time from from February 4, 2010 through February 25, 2010 shall be

excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). 

DATED: ___________________ _________________________________

HONORABLE VAUGHN R. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

2/23/2010 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:09-cr-00102-RS Document 43 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 75309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Coastal Engineering Research Board; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Coastal Engineering Research Board (CERB).
    Date of Meeting: 6-7 January 2005.
    Place: Hyatt Regency DFW, DFW Airport, Texas.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. (6 January 2005). 8 a.m. to 12 noon (7 
January 2005).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries and notice of intent to 
attend the meeting may be addressed to Colonel James R. Rowan, 
Executive Secretary, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development 
Center, Waterways Experiment Station, 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, 
Mississippi 39180-6199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed Agenda: An Executive Session of the 
Board will meet to discuss action items from past meetings and ongoing 
initiatives.
    This meeting is open to the public, but since seating capacity of 
the meeting room is limited, advance notice of intent to attend, 
although not required, is requested in order to assure adequate 
arrangements for those wishing to attend.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-27571 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-61-M
Anthony Costa 

Senior Manager/Chief Inspector 

May 28, 2014 

Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 

Washington, DC 20590. 

Reference Docket ID: FAA-2014-0028 

On January 14, 2014, Gulfstream petitioned for an exemption to 14 CFR 

145.107(a)(1) of the Federal Regulations. In pursuit of other avenues of 

compliance, Gulfstream wished to withdraw this petition for exemption. 

Anthony Costa 

Sr. Quality Manager 

Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation 

Tel: (912) 965 5854
§ 1000.320 How is Formula Current Assisted Stock adjusted for local area costs? There are two adjustment factors that are used to adjust the allocation of funds for the Current Assisted Stock portion of the formula. They are: ( a ) Operating Subsidy as adjusted by the greater of the AEL factor or FMR factor (AELFMR); and
( b ) Modernization as adjusted by TDC.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERIC SEDIE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Defendant. /

No. C-08-04417 EDL

ORDER

In light of the settlement conference scheduled for March 1, 2010, the parties shall file their

joint and separate proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law following court trial no later than

March 11, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2010 

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document 157 Filed 02/10/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. Greg Smith, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc. for the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 (the "Form 10-QSB"), that the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ERF
Wireless, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-QSB.

Dated: May 22, 2006           By:   /s/ R. Greg Smith
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    R. Greg Smith, Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document 887 Filed 07/21/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document885 Filed07/20/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document 887 Filed 07/21/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document885 Filed07/20/10 Page2 of 3
Case3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document885 Filed07/20/10 Page3 of 3

Dated: July 21, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document 887 Filed 07/21/10 Page 3 of 3
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Theodore Miller, Defendant.

Motion by defendant to dispense with printing and for assignment of counsel. Motion denied, without prejudice to its renewal after defendant shall have served and filed a timely notice of appeal (see Code Grim. Pro., § 521). Defendant’s present notice of appeal is premature. It appears that he served it on or about April 30, 1962, and that he is attempting to appeal from an order which was not entered until May 1, 1962 and not served on him until May 2, 1962. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
### §§2471, 2471a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 2471, Pub. L. 100–685, title V, §501, Nov. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 4102, which related to the National Space Council, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 20111 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

A prior section 2471, Pub. L. 85–568, title II, §201, July 29, 1958, 72 Stat. 427; Pub. L. 87–26, §1, Apr. 25, 1961, 75 Stat. 46; Pub. L. 87–367, title II, §207, Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 792; Pub. L. 87–584, §7, Aug. 14, 1962, 76 Stat. 385; Pub. L. 88–426, title III, §§305(13)(A), 306(c), Aug. 14, 1964, 78 Stat. 423, 428; Pub. L. 91–406, Sept. 23, 1970, 84 Stat. 855, which related to the establishment, membership, duties, and personnel of the National Aeronautics and Space Council, was omitted from the Code, because the Council, including the office of Executive Secretary of the Council, together with the functions of the Council, was abolished by section 3(a)(4) of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1973, 38 F.R. 9579, 87 Stat. 1089, effective July 1, 1973, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Section 201 of Pub. L. 85–568 was repealed by Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444, which Act enacted Title 51.

Section 2471a, Pub. L. 101–611, title I, §121, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3204, which related to Users' Advisory Group, was transferred and is set out as a note under section 20111 of Title 51.
### §300j–18a. Annual study on boil water advisories

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after November 15, 2021, and annually thereafter, the Administrator shall conduct a study on the prevalence of boil water advisories issued in the United States.

#### (b) Report

#### (1) In general

The Administrator shall submit to Congress a report describing the results of the most recent study conducted under subsection (a) as part of the annual budget request transmitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31.

#### (2) Requirement

In the annual report required under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall include a description of the reasons for which boil water advisories were issued during the year covered by the report.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. E, title I, §50115, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1157.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section enacted as part of the Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Act of 2021 and also as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition of Administrator

Pub. L. 117–58, div. E, §50002, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1135, provided that: "In this division [see Short Title of 2021 Amendment note set out under section 1251 of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters], the term 'Administrator' means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0453 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SCOTT KELLY WALSH,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 24, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 14 2022

02/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0453
§ 304.1 Scope; definitions. ( a ) This subpart applies to claims asserted under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, accruing on or after January 18, 1967, for money damages against the United States for injury to or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of an officer or employee of the Peace Corps, a person serving the Peace Corps under invitational travel orders, or a Peace Corps Volunteer or trainee while acting within the scope of his office or employment.
( b ) This subpart is not applicable to claims arising in a foreign country; it is applicable to claims arising in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
( c ) This subpart is issued subject to and consistent with applicable regulations on administrative claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act issued by the Attorney General (28 CFR part 14).
( d ) For the purposes of this subpart, the term “General Counsel” means the General Counsel of the Peace Corps or his designee.
[34 FR 5840, Mar. 28, 1969, as amended at 72 FR 4205, Jan. 30, 2007]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Tab A. Keplinger, Chief Financial Officer of Brantley Capital
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Tab A. KeplingerTab A. KeplingerChief Financial OfficerDecember 23, 2003
#### § 1000.402 Are State recognized Indian tribes eligible for guarantees under title VI of NAHASDA?

Those State recognized Indian tribes that meet the definition set forth in section 4(12)(C) of NAHASDA are eligible for guarantees under title VI of NAHASDA.
Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.8

 AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT 

This AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT, dated November 4, 2010, is by and between CIRCOR, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation (the “Company”), and Arjun (AJ) Sharma (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive entered into an executive change in control agreement made as of September 1, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to increase the benefits to which the Executive may become entitled to upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Agreement). 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, do mutually covenant and agree as follows:

 1. Section 3(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “one (1) times” with the
following: 
 “two (2) times” 
 2. Section 3(a)(iv) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “one (1) year” with the following: 

“two (2) years” 
 3. The Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect as to all other provisions under said Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  


			
	CIRCOR, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ A. William Higgins

	Name:	 	A. William Higgins
	Title:	 	Chairman, President & CEO
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Arjun (AJ) Sharma

	Arjun (AJ) Sharma
### §4395. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–515, title V, §501(e), Oct. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1310.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MemberWorks Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James B. Duffy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. Duffy
------------------
James B. Duffy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
MemberWorks Incorporated
November 9, 2004




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEMHAL SIRAJ,

Plaintiff,

 v.

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-00233 SI

ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON

SETTLEMENT

The parties to the action, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed

to a settlement. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that

if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel,

within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order

shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

Dated: SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00233-SI Document 73 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1
#### § 103.205 Systemic processing.

Where the Assistant Secretary determines that the alleged discriminatory practices contained in a complaint are pervasive or institutional in nature, or that the processing of the complaint will involve complex issues, novel questions of fact or law, or will affect a large number of persons, the Assistant Secretary may identify the complaint for systemic processing. This determination can be based on the face of the complaint or on information gathered in connection with an investigation. Systemic investigations may focus not only on documenting facts involved in the alleged discriminatory housing practice that is the subject of the complaint but also on review of other policies and procedures related to matters under investigation, to make sure that they also comply with the nondiscrimination requirements of the Fair Housing Act.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the “Company”),on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, FrankM. Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 22, 2004 | By:    | /s/ FRANK M. SEMPLE     |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Frank M. Semple         |
|                          |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Dear Shirley Rivera 

U.S. EPA Region 9 

R9airpermits@epa.gov

 

April 5, 2011 

 

Since environmental justice and protection of health in disadvantaged communities is your priority, please do not 

allow this plant to add NOx to the San Joaquin Valley which might be in extreme non-attainment for ozone and 

PM 2.5; I could not find our status on the California Air Resources Board or San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 

Control Board web sites. This plant is not in compliance with nitrogen dioxide emission standards under the Clear 

Air Act. We have many citizens around Avenal and especially further south that labor outdoors and must breathe 

the polluted air. I think it is better to increase the expenses of the plant than to ask local citizens to bear the 

increased mortality and medical expense of breathing polluted air. I used to suffer from asthma and I know its 

impact on childhood and adult life. 

 

If this plant is never built, there would be one less plant contributing to global warming. Burning natural gas 

creates almost as much green house gas as burning coal; I include the impact of obtaining the two fossil fuels. 

Kern County has approved the Maricopa Sun solar plant and sent notices of preparation for DEIRs on two others. 

Avenal Power Center, LLC natural gas plant in Avenal

Arthur Unger 

to: 

R9AirPermits 

04/05/2011 01:49 PM 

Cc: 

Arthur D Unger 

Hide Details 

From: Arthur Unger 

To: R9AirPermits@EPA 

Cc: Arthur D Unger 

Page 1 of 2

4/14/2011
There is intent to build many big solar PV and solar thermal plants on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley. 

These, plus solar on our roofs and parking lots, conservation, efficiency and other intermittent energy sources will 

suffice without sacrificing our health and worsening climate change. What little natural gas the world uses should 

be devoted to transportation. 

 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment, 

Arthur Unger 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 2

4/14/2011