alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Executive Order 13367

# United States-Mexico Border Health Commission

                    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288) (the “Act”), and having found that the United States participates in the United States-Mexico Border Health Commission (USMBHC) pursuant to the United-States Mexico Border Health Commission Act, Public Law 103-400 (22 U.S.C. 290n*et seq*.), I hereby designate the USMBHC as a public international organization for purposes of the International Organizations Immunities Act. I hereby extend to members and employees of the Mexican Section of the USMBHC the same privileges, exemptions, and immunities as are accorded under similar circumstances to officers and employees, respectively, of foreign governments with regard to the laws regulating entry into and departure from the United States as provided for in section 7(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 288d(a)). No other privileges, exemptions, or immunities of the Act are extended under this order.                

This designation is not intended to abridge in any respect privileges, exemptions, or immunities that the USMBHC otherwise may have acquired or may acquire by law.

[FR Doc. 04-28404

Billing code 3195-01-P
NO. 07-02-0530-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	OCTOBER 10, 2003

	______________________________

	TYRONE YARBROUGH, APPELLANT

	V.

	TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL., APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 87,475-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	On December 30, 2002, a copy of a Notice of Appeal from an Order of Dismissal in Cause No. 87,475-B in the 181st  District Court of Potter County, Texas, was filed with the clerk of this court.  The Order of Dismissal was signed on December 2, 2002. 

	On April 1, 2003, the trial court clerk’s record was filed with the clerk of this court.  There has not been a reporter’s record filed with this court.  

	By letter dated August 26, 2003, appellant was advised that appellant’s brief did not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.  The Court directed appellant to re-brief and file a corrected brief on or before September 19, 2003.  No response has been received to the letter of August 26, 2003.  Neither appellant’s corrected brief nor a motion to extend time for filing the corrected brief have been filed. 

	This appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). 

								Per Curiam
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

DANIEL P. BLANK

Assistant Federal Public Defender

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant ANGUIANO-MARTINEZ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JESUS ANGUIANO-MARTINEZ,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-1164 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING

HEARING

Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01164-MHP Document 13 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sentencing for Jesus Anguiano-Martinez, the defendant in the above-captioned case, is

currently set for April 26, 2010. However, due to unavoidable scheduling conflicts with undersigned

counsel for Mr. Anguiano-Martinez, the U.S. Probation Officer assigned to the case has not yet been

able to conduct a presentence interview. The interview has been scheduled for the soonest available

date, March 11, 2010. Accordingly, the parties stipulate and jointly request that the sentencing date

be continued to May 24, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., to accommodate this delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

 United States Attorney

DATED: February 24, 2010 ____/s/_______________________

PATRICIA SPALETTA

Special Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: February 23, 2010 ___/s/_________________________

DANIEL P. BLANK

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Attorney for Jesus Anguiano-Martinez

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: _____________________________

MARILYN HALL PATEL

United States District Judge

STIP. & PROP. ORDER 1

2/25/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01164-MHP Document 13 Filed 02/25/10 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Office of Research and Development, VA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of government owned invention available for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of results of federally funded research and development. Foreign patents are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. companies and may also be available for licensing. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Technical and licensing information on the invention may be obtained by writing to: Mindy L. Aisen, M.D., Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Technology Transfer Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420; fax: (202) 254-0473; email:                         *mindy.aisen@mail.va.gov.*                         Any request for information should include the number and title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention available for licensing is: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/580,382 “Computer Program to Quantify Pharyngeal Residue and Swallowing”. 

Dated: December 13, 2004. 

Anthony J. Principi, 

Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 04-28039 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 76412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

32 CFR Part 630

RIN 0702-AA47


Absentee Deserter Apprehension Program and Surrender of Military 
Personnel to Civilian Authorities

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule, removal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action removes 32 CFR part 630 published in the Federal 
Register July 26, 1996 (61 FR 39073). The rule is being removed because 
it is now obsolete and does not affect the general public.

DATES: Effective December 21, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Provost 
Marshal General, ATTN: DAPM-MPD-LE, 2800 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 
20310-2800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Nate Evans, (703) 693-2126.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Provost Marshal General 
(DAPM-MPD-LE), is the proponent for regulations in 32 CFR part 630, and 
has concluded this regulation is obsolete. This regulation has been 
extensively revised, and the revised regulation does not affect the 
general public. Therefore, it would be helpful in avoiding confusion 
with the public if 32 CFR part 630, is removed.

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 630

    Absentee deserter apprehension program and surrender of military 
personnel to civilian authorities.

PART 630--[REMOVED]

0
Accordingly, for reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority of 
10 U.S.C. 801 through 940; Manual for Courts-Martial, U.S. 2002 revised 
addition as amended; sec 709, Pub L. 96-154, Defense Appropriation Act. 
93 Stat. 1153, 32 CFR Part 630, Absentee Deserter Apprehension Program 
and Surrender of Military Personnel to Civilian Authorities, is removed 
in its entirety.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-27850 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### § 1000.322 Are IHA financed units included in the determination of Formula Current Assisted Stock?

No. If these units are not owned or operated at the time (September 30, 1997) pursuant to an ACC then they are not included in the determination of Formula Current Assisted Stock.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Open-File Report 2007-1084

# Heavy Oil and Natural Bitumen Resources in Geological Basins of the World

**By Richard F. Meyer, Emil D. Attanasi, and Philip A. Freeman**

**2007**

## Abstract

Heavy oil and natural bitumen are oils set apart by their high viscosity (resistance to flow) and high density (low API gravity). These attributes reflect the invariable presence of up to 50 weight percent asphaltenes, very high molecular weight hydrocarbon molecules incorporating many heteroatoms in their lattices. Almost all heavy oil and natural bitumen are alteration products of conventional oil. Total resources of heavy oil in known accumulations are 3,396 billion barrels of original oil in place, of which 30 billion barrels are included as prospective additional oil. The total natural bitumen resource in known accumulations amounts to 5,505 billion barrels of oil originally in place, which includes 993 billion barrels as prospective additional oil. This resource is distributed in 192 basins containing heavy oil and 89 basins with natural bitumen. Of the nine basic Klemme basin types, some with subdivisions, the most prolific by far for known heavy oil and natural bitumen volumes are continental multicyclic basins, either basins on the craton margin or closed basins along convergent plate margins. The former includes 47 percent of the natural bitumen, the latter 47 percent of the heavy oil and 46 percent of the natural bitumen. Little if any heavy oil occurs in fore-arc basins, and natural bitumen does not occur in either fore-arc or delta basins.

Open-File Report 2007-1084  [1.4-MB PDF]

Plates 1-3. Heavy Oil and Natural Bitumen Resources in Geological Basins of the World [all plates measure 66x36 inches]:

Plate 1. Map Showing Klemme Basin Classification of Sedimentary Provinces Reporting Heavy Oil or Natural Bitumen [5.3-MB PDF]

Plate 2. Map of Sedimentary Provinces Reporting Heavy Oil [6.1-MB PDF]

Plate 3. Map of Sedimentary Provinces Reporting Natural Bitumen  [6-MB PDF]

----

| **To order maps, publications, and other miscellaneous products on paper and compact disc media from the USGS:**  USGS Information Services |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Opinion issued August 29 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 00032
- CV

——————————— IRON OAK, INC. , Appella nt

V. JOHN T. PRESTON AND MICHAEL EUGENE PORTER , Appell e e s

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2020
- 23705

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Iron Oak, Inc. is attempting to appeal from the trial court’s January 18, 2022 order disbursing escrow funds and staying proceedings pending judgment in certain litigation in the State of New York. This January 18, 2022 order was also the subjec t of a petition for writ of mandamus filed in case number2

01

- 22

- 00170

- CV. In the mandamus case, real parties in interest (appellees in this appeal) filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that the mandamus case was moot because the trial court had withdrawn the January 18, 2022 order. On July 6, 2022, this Court issued a notice that this appeal might be dismissed as moot because the order appealed had been withdrawn by the trial court and we invited the parties to file a response by July 17, 2023 establishing that the appeal is not moot. No responses were filed. A case becomes moot if there is no longer a justiciable controversy between the parties. See Heckman v. Williamson Cty. , 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012). “To constitute a justiciable controversy, th ere must exist a real and substantial controversy involving a genuine conflict of tangible interest s and not merely a theoretical dispute.” Save Our Springs Alliance v. City of Austin , 149 S.W.3d 674, 681 (Tex. App.

— Austin 2004, no pet.). Because the tri al court has withdrawn the order appealed in this case, there is no longer a justiciable controversy between the parties and therefore, the appeal is moot and we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

. See Heckman , 369 S.W.3d at 162. According ly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction . Any pending motions are also dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

    v.

ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.                                                                      /

No. C 08-5005 MMC

ORDER REFERRING TO MAGISTRATEJUDGE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TOQUASH OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-1, plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Defendants’ Subpoena,

or in the Alternative, for a Protective Order, filed May 27, 2010, and all further discovery

matters, are hereby REFERRED to a Magistrate Judge to be heard and considered at the

convenience of the assigned Magistrate Judge’s calendar.

Counsel will be advised of the date, time and place of the next appearance, if any,

by notice from the assigned Magistrate Judge’s chambers.

The July 2, 2010 hearing before the undersigned is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:  May 28, 2010                                                       MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05005-MMC   Document 37   Filed 05/28/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-08T14:54:49-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### § 1000.228 If HUD changes its IHP format will Indian tribes be involved?

Yes. HUD will first consult with Indian tribes before making any substantial changes to HUD's IHP format.
APPENDIX T: C&O CANAL NHP – HERP SPECIES OBSERVED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Georgetown University Boathouse 

Environmental Assessment 

April 2006 
Herp Species observed by habitat at CHOH Surveys 

Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Marshall University 

Inventory and Monitoring Program 

National Capital Region Network 

Center for Urban Ecology 

Washington D.C. 

TIC #: NCRO-D-61 

July 12, 2005 

Scientific Name, Common Name 

Frogs and Toad, 

Bufo a. americanus, Eastern American Toad 

Hyla versicolor, Gray Treefrog, 

Rana c. melanota, Northern Green Frog 

Rana catesbeiana, American Bullfrog

Rana palustris, Pickerel Frog

Rana sylvatica, Wood Frog

Salamanders, 

Ambystoma jeffersonianum, Jefferson Salamander

Ambystoma maculatum, Spotted Salamander

Ambystoma opacum, Marbled Salamander 

Eurycea bislineata, Northern Two-lined Salamander

Eurycea longicauda, Long-tailed Salamander

Notophthalmus v. viridescens, Red-spotted Newt

Plethodon cinereus, Eastern Red-backed Salamander

Plethodon hoffmani, Valley and Ridge Salamander

Lizards, 

Eumeces fasciatus, Five-lined Skink 

Sceloporus undulates, Eastern Fence Lizard 

Snakes, 

Diadophis p. edwardsii, Northern Ring-necked Snake

Elaphe o. obsolete, Black Ratsnake

Nerodia s. sipedon, Common Watersnake

Thamnophis s. sauritus, Common Ribbonsnake
Thamnophis s. sirtalis, Eastern Gartersnake

Turtles, 

Chelydra s. serpentina, Eastern Snapping Turtle

Chrysemys p. picta, Eastern Painted Turtle

Glyptemys insculpta, Wood Turtle

Pseudemys rubriventris, Northern Red-bellied Cooter

Sternotherus odoratus, Stinkpot

Terrapene c. carolina, Eastern Box Turtle
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from At Home
Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0001020620
<NAME> AT HOME CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         157,508
<SECURITIES>                                   231,224
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,812
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               534,072
<PP&E>                                         292,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,108,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          328,417
<BONDS>                                        739,853
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    373,271
<COMMON>                                     9,687,461
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,090,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,108,719
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,784
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,492,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,344,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,344,784)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,334,784)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.43)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Election of Directors of the Herbert McLean Purdy Management Corporation. Frances M. Purdy et al., Individually and as Executrices of Herbert McL. Purdy, Deceased; Herbert McLean Purdy Management Corporation et al.

Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to •appeal to the Court of Appeals -denied, with $10 costs. 'Concur ■— Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens -and Bastow, JJ.
#### Joseph Gottlieb v. Park Avenue Offices, Inc., et al.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points and all exhibits except plaintiff’s Exhibit 3 if it cannot be found in its entirety, in which event so much as can be found shall be reproduced with a statement that the remainder of the exhibit was lost or mislaid, to be served and filed on or before February 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the April 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §7381c. Education partnerships

#### (a) Education partnerships

The Secretary may authorize each Department research and development facility, to the extent practicable and consistent with the provisions of the laboratory's management and operating contract, to enter into education partnership agreements with educational institutions in the United States (including local educational agencies, colleges, and universities) for the purpose of encouraging and enhancing study in scientific disciplines at all levels of education.

#### (b) Types of assistance

Under a partnership agreement entered into with an educational institution under subsection (a) and as authorized by the Secretary, a Department research and development facility may provide assistance to the educational institution by—

(1) loaning or transferring equipment to the institution;

(2) transferring to the institution equipment determined by the director of the Department research and development facility to be surplus;

(3) making personnel of Department research and development facilities available to teach science courses or to assist in the development of science courses and materials for the institution;

(4) involving faculty and students of the institution in research programs of Department research and development facilities;

(5) cooperating with the institution in developing a program under which students may be given academic credit for work on research projects of Department research and development facilities;

(6) providing academic and career advice and assistance to students of the institution; and

(7) providing funds to educational institutions to hire personnel to facilitate interactions between local school systems, Department research and development facilities, and corporate and governmental entities.

(Pub. L. 101–510, div. C, title XXXI, §3166, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1843; Pub. L. 109–58, title XI, §1102(c), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 938.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 109–58, §1102(c)(1), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows: "loaning equipment to the institution;".

Subsec. (b)(7). Pub. L. 109–58, §1102(c)(2)–(4), added par. (7).