alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

 The parties’ letter briefs are found at Docket Nos. 88 and 89.

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SARAH KIM,

Plaintiff,

 v.

INTERDENT INC., et al.,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-5565 SI

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER

DEPOSITION

A dispute has arisen regarding the scheduling of plaintiff’s further deposition.1

 Defendants seek

an order compelling plaintiff’s further deposition on May 28, 2010, in order to meet the current pretrial

deadline of June 4, 2010 to file defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff states that she is

unavailable on May 28 because she is pursuing a master’s degree and has papers due and final exams

scheduled between May 26 and May 30. Plaintiff states that she is available for deposition on June 1,

and proposes that defendants be permitted to use the rough transcript of the deposition for the purpose

of filing the summary judgment motion, followed by supplementing the rough transcript with the

certified transcript upon receipt.

The Court finds that plaintiff’s proposal is reasonable, with a slight modification in the briefing

schedule to account for the timing of plaintiff’s deposition. Plaintiff shall appear for her resumed

deposition on June 1, 2010, and defendants may use the rough deposition transcript, followed by

supplementing with the certified transcript. Dispositive motions shall be filed by June 8, 2010,

Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 90 Filed 05/26/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

oppositions are due June 22, 2010, replies are due by noon on June 29, 2010, and the hearing shall

remain on July 9, 2010 at 9:00 am.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May ____, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05565-SI Document 90 Filed 05/26/10 Page 2 of 2
### §18092. Notification of nonenrollment

Not later than June 30 of each year, the Secretary of the Treasury, acting through the Internal Revenue Service and in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall send a notification to each individual who files an individual income tax return and who is not enrolled in minimum essential coverage (as defined in section 5000A of title 26). Such notification shall contain information on the services available through the Exchange operating in the State in which such individual resides.

(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1502(c), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 251.)
§ 224.30 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the defendant is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 224.3, and if so, the appropriate amount of any such civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) A.I.D. shall prove defendant's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The defendant shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.
ltiROP Ce410 4kilfeLjAM fiieiiLwi 0047364 te21

F5 2f

Rot

ger 41424d41tiefiotied td kre

g Eb 636 II 41 y Afe crgile 7 6Oi Scr iiiij2 443VI

94y6 vtreAe44A X 141akad 51fluil1 WANAL

LiK4 CAVA f leArt4J

41i la iZ F 1

0

x701c 7 Idek JA 63 175 r 7o x 1000

iozn4

fl4 RFD x 76 k A PI 01371177< 7o gV

Iiillqqtr

FC R A B c 17 0 0524 x Iq 0011536

jLL US40S

i fte0 Lea x le5 c Y 70 4204 4 Fa

C36 X 704400304 X 111 A WO TL

ill 4 0 FD x 64 scbo yfek I 7 A av lif

L64q42r

AligAlff56444cops1404 7 SyhtoreN N 44

Isre

igi1 t i

C6kaak6 Aioutkel 41411 i s6 taid ea i

015 aLWVY IhLC uslitriaLitutedSpi

ut

otly

mo 4wkrmzukjkoiRiAida134

EPA003537
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7013

RALPH DORELL BARR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER NASH; SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITYABINGDON FACILITY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00279-JCT-RSB)

Submitted: September 13, 2013 Decided: September 23, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Dorell Barr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Dorell Barr appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Barr v. Nash, No. 7:13-cv-00279-JCTRSB (W.D. Va. June 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §7261. Acquisition of copyrights, patents, etc.

The Secretary is authorized to acquire any of the following described rights if the property acquired thereby is for use by or for, or useful to, the Department:

(1) copyrights, patents, and applications for patents, designs, processes, and manufacturing data;

(2) licenses under copyrights, patents, and applications for patents; and

(3) releases, before suit is brought, for past infringement of patents or copyrights.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §651, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 601.)
### §7620. Standardized air quality modeling

#### (a) Conferences

Not later than six months after August 7, 1977, and at least every three years thereafter, the Administrator shall conduct a conference on air quality modeling. In conducting such conference, special attention shall be given to appropriate modeling necessary for carrying out part C of subchapter I (relating to prevention of significant deterioration of air quality).

#### (b) Conferees

The conference conducted under this section shall provide for participation by the National Academy of Sciences, representatives of State and local air pollution control agencies, and appropriate Federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation; 1 the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

#### (c) Comments; transcripts

Interested persons shall be permitted to submit written comments and a verbatim transcript of the conference proceedings shall be maintained.

#### (d) Promulgation and revision of regulations relating to air quality modeling

The comments submitted and the transcript maintained pursuant to subsection (c) shall be included in the docket required to be established for purposes of promulgating or revising any regulation relating to air quality modeling under part C of subchapter I.

(July 14, 1955, ch. 360, title III, §320, as added Pub. L. 95–95, title III, §310, Aug. 7, 1977, 91 Stat. 782; amended Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "National Bureau of Standards".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 7, 1977, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 406(d) of Pub. L. 95–95, set out as an Effective Date of 1977 Amendment note under section 7401 of this title.

1 So in original. The semicolon probably should be a comma.
### §2751. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 2751, originally enacted as section 121 of Pub. L. 88–452, was renumbered section 441 of Pub. L. 89–329 and transferred to section 1087–51 of Title 20, Education.
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

 537991.1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THOMAS M. HERLIHY (SBN 83615) 

JOHN T. BURNITE (SBN 162223) 

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 

525 Market Street, 17th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2725 

Tel.: (415) 433-0990 

Fax: (415) 434-1370 

Email: herlihy@wilsonelser.com

john.burnite@wilsonelser.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNUM GROUP (previously known as 

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION), 

THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

and NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LEWIS G. SHEPLER II, M.D. 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION; THE 

PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY and UNUM GROUP, inclusive, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: C08-00240 MEJ 

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT 

Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 79 Filed 04/30/10 Page 1 of 2
-1- 

STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

Case No.: C08-00240 MEJ 

 537991.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties, plaintiff Lewis G. Shepler II, 

M.D. and defendants Unum Group (previously known as UnumProvident Corporation), The Paul 

Revere Life Insurance Company, and New York Life Insurance Company (“defendants”), hereby 

stipulate that defendants shall have an extension to respond to the Complaint up to and including 

June 10, 2010. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

KNOX RICKSEN, LLP 

 

 

Dated: April 29, 2010 By_______/s/____________________ 

 Thomas E. Fraysse 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 LEWIS G. SHEPLER II, M.D. 

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & 

DICKER LLP 

Dated: April 29, 2010 By_________/s/_____________________ 

 Thomas M. Herlihy 

 John T. Burnite 

 Attorney for Defendants 

UNUM GROUP (Previously known as 

UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION), 

THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY and NEW YORK LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

ORDER 

 IT IS SO ORDERED that defendants have up to and including June 10, 2010 to respond 

to plaintiff’s complaint. 

Date: April __, 2010 _____________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

30

Case 3:08-cv-00240-MEJ Document 79 Filed 04/30/10 Page 2 of 2
### §6991g. State authority

Nothing in this subchapter shall preclude or deny any right of any State or political subdivision thereof to adopt or enforce any regulation, requirement, or standard of performance respecting underground storage tanks that is more stringent than a regulation, requirement, or standard of performance in effect under this subchapter or to impose any additional liability with respect to the release of regulated substances within such State or political subdivision.

(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, §9008, as added Pub. L. 98–616, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3286; amended Pub. L. 99–499, title II, §205(g), Oct. 17, 1986, 100 Stat. 1702.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1986—Pub. L. 99–499 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "Nothing in this subchapter shall preclude or deny any right of any State or political subdivision thereof to adopt or enforce any regulation, requirement or standard of performance respecting underground storage tanks that is more stringent than a regulation, requirement, or standard of performance in effect under this subchapter."
#### (A) The People of the State of New York v. Bernard Donnery. (B) The People of the State of New York v. Bernard F. Sage.

[In each action] Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.
#### § 92.94 Replying to inquiries regarding service of process or other documents.

Officers should make prompt and courteous replies to all inquiries regarding the service of legal process or documents of like nature, and should render such assistance as they properly can to the court and to interested parties. Such assistance could include furnishing information as to the standard procedure of the locality for service of legal papers, with the name and address of the local office having a bailiff authorized to effect and make return of service; it could include furnishing a list of local attorneys capable of making necessary arrangements; or it could, where appropriate, include a suggestion that the request of the American court might be presented to the foreign judicial authorities in the form of letters rogatory (see definition, § 92.54, and procedures, § 92.66 (b)). If the person upon whom the process is intended to be served is known to be willing to accept service, or if it is clear that it would be in his interest at least to be informed of the matter, the consular officer may suggest to the interested parties in the United States the drawings up of papers for voluntary execution by such person, such as a waiver of service or a document which would be acceptable to the American court to signify the person's entering an appearance in the action pending therein.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:56:21-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 203.481 Maturity of debentures.

Debentures shall mature 10 years from the date of issue.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2707 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic acid, [4-(2,6-dihydro-2,6-dioxo7-phenylbenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]difuran -3-yl)phenoxy]-, 2-ethoxyethyl ester. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetic acid, [4-(2,6- 

dihydro-2,6-dioxo-7-phenylbenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]difuran -3- 

yl)phenoxy]-, 2-ethoxyethyl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACETIC ACID, [4-(2,6-DIHYDRO-2,6-DIOXO-7- 

4 PHENYLBENZO[1,2-B:4,5-B′]DIFURAN-3- 

5 YL)PHENOXY]-, 2-ETHOXYETHYL ESTER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 
2 

•HR 2707 IH 

‘‘ 9902.12.11 Acetic acid, [4-(2,6-dihydro2,6-dioxo-7-phenylbenzo[1,2- 

b:4,5-b′]difuran-3- 

yl)phenoxy]-, 2-ethoxyethyl 

ester. (CAS No. 126877–05– 

2) (provided for in subheading 3204.11.35) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 1006.325 Maintenance, management and efficient operation. ( a ) *Written policies.* The DHHL must develop and enforce policies governing the management and maintenance of rental housing assisted with NHHBG funds.
( b ) *Disposal of housing.* This section may not be construed to prevent the DHHL, or any entity funded by the DHHL, from demolishing or disposing of housing, pursuant to regulations established by HUD.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Stipulation to Continue 09-838 MHP 1

BARRY J. PORTMAN

Federal Public Defender

GEOFFREY A. HANSEN

Chief Assistant Federal Public Defender

19th Floor Federal Building – Box 36106

450 Golden Gate Avenue

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7700

Counsel for Defendant AREVALO-HERNANDEZ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

IVAN AREVALO-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant.

_____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-09- 838 MHP

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

SENTENCING

Due to the defendant’s counsel’s absence, the Probation Officer was unable to complete

the probation interview of the defendant in a timely fashion, and although an amended report has

been prepared in this matter, the parties will need additional time to prepare for sentencing. As a

result, the defendant asks the Court to continue the sentencing in this matter from February 22,

2010 to March 15, 2010 at 9:00. The Probation Officer and the United States Attorney assigned

to this case do not oppose this request.

As a result, the parties stipulate that the sentencing in this matter be continued until

March 15, 2010.

//

Case 3:09-cr-00838-MHP Document 14 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Stipulation to Continue 09-838 MHP 2

Date: 02/12/2010 __________/S/_______________________

Geoffrey A. Hansen

Counsel for Defendant Arevalo-Hernandez

Date: 02/12/2010 __________/S/______________________

Patricia Spaletta

Special Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: __________________________________

Marilyn Hall Patel

United States District Court Judge

2/17/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-00838-MHP Document 14 Filed 02/18/10 Page 2 of 2
### §5315. Interstate agreements or compacts; purposes

The consent of the Congress is hereby given to any two or more States to enter into agreements or compacts, not in conflict with any law of the United States, for cooperative effort and mutual assistance in support of community development planning and programs carried out under this chapter as they pertain to interstate areas and to localities within such States, and to establish such agencies, joint or otherwise, as they may deem desirable for making such agreements and compacts effective.

(Pub. L. 93–383, title I, §115, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 651.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title I of Pub. L. 93–383, Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 633, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
### §8233. Weatherization study

The President shall conduct a study which shall monitor the weatherization activities authorized by this Act and amendments made thereby and those weatherization activities undertaken, independently of this Act and such amendments. The President shall report to the Congress within one year from November 9, 1978, and annually thereafter, concerning—

(1) the extent of progress being made through weatherization activities toward the achievement of national energy conservation goals;

(2) adequacy and costs of materials necessary for weatherization activities; and

(3) the need for and desirability of modifying weatherization activities authorized by this Act, and amendments made thereby and of extending such activities to a broader range of income groups than are being assisted under this Act and such amendments.

(Pub. L. 95–619, title II, §254, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3237.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–619, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3206, known as the National Energy Conservation Policy Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8201 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in this section relating to the requirement that the President report annually to Congress, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and the last item on page 40 of House Document No. 103–7.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:08:11-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 103.115 Notification upon reactivation. ( a ) Whenever a complaint referred to a State or local fair housing agency under § 103.100 is reactivated under § 103.110, the Assistant Secretary will notify the substantially equivalent State or local agency, the aggrieved person and the respondent of HUD's reactivation. The notification will be made by certified mail or personal service.
( b ) The notification to the respondent and the aggrieved person will: ( 1 ) Advise the aggrieved person and the respondent of the time limits applicable to complaint processing and the procedural rights and obligations of the aggrieved person and the respondent under this part and part 180.
( 2 ) State that HUD will process the complaint under the Fair Housing Act and that the State or local agency to which the complaint was referred may continue to process the complaint under State or local law.
( 3 ) Advise the aggrieved person and the respondent of the aggrieved person's right to commence a civil action under section 813 of the Fair Housing Act in an appropriate United States District Court, not later than two years after the occurrence or termination of the alleged discriminatory housing practice. The notice will state that the computation of this two-year period excludes any time during which a proceeding is pending under this part or part 180 with respect to a complaint or charge based on the alleged discriminatory housing practice under part 180. The notices will also state that the time period includes the time during which an action arising from a breach of conciliation agreement under section 814(b)(2) of the Fair Housing Act is pending.
[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996]
Glenn R. Kantor - SBN 122643 

e-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net 

Corinne Chandler - SBN 111423 

e-mail: cchandler@kantorlaw.net 

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

19839 Nordhoff Street 

Northridge, CA 91324 

Telephone: (818)886-2525 

Fax: (818)350-6272 

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

CLAIRE M. KRUMPOTICH 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CLAIRE M. KRUMPOTICH, 

Plaintiff, 

VS. 

PIONEER LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF ILLINOIS; 

WASHINGTON NATIONAL HEALTH 

INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

CONSECO SENIOR HEALTH 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO: C 09-00335 JSW 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CASE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Claire M. Krumpotich and 

Defendants, Pioneer Life Insurance Company of Illinois; Washington National Health 

Insurance Company and Conseco Senior Health Insurance Company, by and through their 

respective counsel of record, that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party 

shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees. 

DATED: March ^5, 2010 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

By (AmML /fauUlus : 

Corinne Chandler 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal of Case 

Case 3:09-cv-00335-JSW Document 46 Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cv-00335-JSW Document45 Filed03/15/10 Page1 of 3
DATED: March )3 ,2010 S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, P.C 

Attorneys for Defendants 

***ORDER*** 

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above entitled action is dismissed with 

prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees. 

DATED: 

Hon. Jeffrey S.White 

United States District Court Judge 

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order for Dismissal of Case 

Case3:09-cv-00335-JSW Document45 Filed03/15/10 Page2 of 3

March 16, 2010

Case 3:09-cv-00335-JSW Document 46 Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 2