76014 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Notices 

1See Certain Steel Nails from Taiwan: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018–2019, 85 FR 

19138 (April 6, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

4See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of 

Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan, 

and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 80 FR 39994 (July 13, 

2015) (Order). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain 

Steel Nails from Taiwan; 2018–2019’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice. 

96. Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. 

97. Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

98. Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., 

Ltd. 

99. Nanjing Minglin Wooden Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

100. Ningbo Tianyi Bamboo and Wood 

Products Co., Ltd. 

101. Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) 

Co., Ltd. 

102. Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd. 

103. Power Dekor North America Inc. 

104. PT. Tanjung Kreasi Parquet Industry 

105. Qingdao Barry Flooring Co., Ltd. 

106. Qingdao Wisdom International 

107. Samling Elegant Living Trading 

(Labuan) Ltd. 

108. Samling Riverside Co., Ltd. 

109. Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material 

Co. Ltd. 

110. Shandong Kaiyuan Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

111. Shandong Longteng Wood Co., Ltd. 

112. Shandong Puli Trading Co., Ltd. 

113. Shanghai Anxin (Weiguang) Timber Co., 

Ltd. 

114. Shanghai Demeija Timber Co., Ltd. 

115. Shanghai Eswell Timber Co., Ltd. 

116. Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd. 

117. Shanghai Lizhong Wood Products Co., 

Ltd. (aka The Lizhong Wood Industry 

Limited Company of Shanghai) 

118. Shanghai New Sihe Wood Co., Ltd. 

119. Shanghai Shenlin Corporation 

120. Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co., 

Ltd. 

121. Shenyang Haobainian Wooden Co., Ltd. 

122. Shenyang Sende Wood Co., Ltd. 

123. Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd. 

124. Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. 

125. Suifenhe Chengfeng Trading Co., Ltd. 

126. Sunyoung Wooden Products 

127. Suzhou Anxin Weiguang Timber Co., 

Ltd. 

128. Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd. 

129. Tak Wah Building Material (Suzhou) Co. 

130. Tech Wood International Ltd. 

131. The Greenville Flooring Co., Ltd. 

132. Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

133. Topocean Consolidation Service 

134. Vicwood Industry (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. 

135. Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd. 

136. Xuzhou Antop International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

137. Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd. 

138. Yekalon Industry, Inc. 

139. Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. 

140. Yixing Lion-King Timber Industry 

141. Zhejiang Anji Xinfeng Bamboo and 

Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

142. Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd. 

143. Zhejiang Dadongwu Auto Elect Motor 

144. Zhejiang Dadongwu Green Home Wood 

Co., Ltd. 

145. Zhejiang Desheng Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

146. Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

147. Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd. 

148. Zhejiang Fuma Warm Technology Co., 

Ltd. 

149. Zhejiang Haoyun Wooden Co., Ltd. 

150. Zhejiang Jesonwood Co., Ltd. 

151. Zhejiang Jiaye Flooring 

152. Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

153. Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd. 

154. Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

155. Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd. 

156. Zhejiang Tianzhen Bamboo & Wood 

Development Co., Ltd. 

157. Zhejiang Yongyu Bamboo Joint-Stock 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26230 Filed 11–25–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–854] 

Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 

2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that certain 

steel nails from Taiwan were sold in the 

United States at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR), July 

1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable November 27, 2020. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results on April 6, 2020.1 On April 24, 

2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by 50 days.2 On 

July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all 

deadlines in administrative reviews by 

an additional 60 days.3 The deadline for 

the final results of this review is now 

November 23, 2020. 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by this 

order is certain steel nails. The certain 

steel nails subject to the order are 

currently classifiable under HTSUS 

subheadings 7317.00.55.02, 

7317.00.55.03, 7317.00.55.05, 

7317.00.55.07, 7317.00.55.08, 

7317.00.55.11, 7317.00.55.18, 

7317.00.55.19, 7317.00.55.20, 

7317.00.55.30, 7317.00.55.40, 

7317.00.55.50, 7317.00.55.60, 

7317.00.55.70, 7317.00.55.80, 

7317.00.55.90, 7317.00.65.30, 

7317.00.65.60 and 7317.00.75.00. 

Certain steel nails subject to this order 

also may be classified under HTSUS 

subheadings 7907.00.60.00, 

8206.00.00.00 or other HTSUS 

subheadings. While the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

In the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, we addressed all issues 

raised in parties’ case and rebuttal 

briefs. In the Appendix to this notice, 

we provide a list of the issues raised by 

parties. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on-file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. The signed and the 

electronic versions of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, we made no changes to our 

Preliminary Results, with the exception 

of the cash deposit and assessment 

instructions regarding suspended 

subject merchandise entries exported by 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Notices 76015 

6See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 19139. 7 Id. 

8See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954, 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties); see also Certain Pasta from 

Turkey: Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

23974, 23977 (April 29, 2011), unchanged in Pasta 

from Turkey: Notice of Final Results of the 14th 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

68399 (November 4, 2011). 

9See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 19139 (citing 

Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F. 3d 1345 

(Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle)). 

10As stated in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and in this notice, this rate does not 

apply to entries of subject merchandise exported by 

Quick Advance Inc. and produced by Ko’s Nail Inc. 

This exporter-producer channel of sales is excluded 

from the Order. See Order, 80 FR at 39996. 

11See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian 

Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 

(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal 

from the Russian Federation: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

56989 (September 17, 2010). For a full discussion 

of this practice, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

12See Certain Steel Nails From Taiwan: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 

FR 28959, 28961 (May 20, 2015) (Final 

Determination); see also Order, 80 FR at 39996. 

Quick Advance, Inc., and produced by 

Ko’s Nail, Inc., as discussed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Astrotech Steels Private 

Limited, Jinhai Hardware Co., Ltd., 

Region International Co., Ltd., Region 

Industries, and Region System Sdn Bhd. 

had no shipments during the POR.6 As 

we have not received any information to 

contradict this determination, consistent 

with our practice, we will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate any existing entries of subject 

merchandise produced by these five 

companies, but exported by other 

parties, at the rate for the intermediate 

reseller, if available, or at the all-others 

rate. 

Final Determination of No Reviewable 

Sales 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Create Trading Co., Ltd. 

(Create Trading) had no reviewable sales 

during the POR.7 As we have not 

received any information to contradict 

this determination, we continue to find 

that Create Trading had no reviewable 

sales of subject merchandise during the 

POR. As discussed further in the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section below, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate any 

existing entries of merchandise 

produced by Create Trading’s 

unaffiliated producers and exported by 

Create Trading at the rate applicable to 

the unaffiliated producers, i.e., the allothers rate.8

Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

As we stated in the Preliminary 

Results, in accordance with the U.S. 

Court of Appeals for the Federal 

Circuit’s decision in Albemarle,9 we are 

applying a rate based on the simple 

average of the individual rates applied 

to Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co., LLC 

(Bonuts) and Pro-Team Coil Nail 

Enterprise, Inc. (PT) in this 

administrative review (i.e., 78.17 

percent) to the companies not selected 

for individual examination. Commerce 

has addressed arguments from various 

interested parties regarding our 

preliminary determination and, for the 

final results, the determination remains 

unchanged, as discussed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Administrative 

Review 

We have determined the following 

dumping margins for the firms listed 

below for the period July 1, 2018 

through June 30, 2019: 

Exporter/producer 

Dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Bonuts Hardware Logistics Co., 

LLC .......................................... 78.17 

PT Enterprise, Inc./Pro-Team 

Coil Nail Enterprise, Inc .......... 78.17 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable 

to Companies Under Review Not Selected for Individual Examination (percent) 

See Appendix II for the 75 companies under review subject to 

the review-specific average 

rate 10 ...................................... 78.17 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce 

will determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. For these final results, we will 

instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem 

assessment rate of 78.17 percent to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were produced and/or 

exported by mandatory respondents, 

Bonuts and PT, and the companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination. 

As indicated above, for each company 

which we determined had ‘‘no 

shipments’’ of the subject merchandise 

during the POR, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate all POR entries associated with 

these companies at the all-others rate if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction, consistent with Commerce’s 

reseller policy.11

We determined that Create Trading 

was not the first party in the transaction 

chain to have knowledge that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, and thus Create Trading 

is not considered the exporter of subject 

merchandise during the POR for 

purposes of this review. In our May 6, 

2003, ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

clarification, we explained that, where 

respondents in an administrative review 

demonstrate that they had no 

knowledge of sales through resellers to 

the United States, we would instruct 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the allothers rate applicable to the proceeding. 

Here, Commerce finds that Create 

Trading had no shipments of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR for which it was the first party 

with knowledge of U.S. destination. 

Because ‘‘as entered’’ liquidation 

instructions do not alleviate the 

concerns which the May 2003 

clarification was intended to address, 

we find it appropriate in this case to 

instruct CBP to liquidate any existing 

entries of merchandise produced by 

Create Trading’s unaffiliated producers 

and exported by Create Trading. 

Finally, based on the Final 

Determination of the underlying 

investigation and Order,12 no 

suspension of liquidation is required for 

entries of subject merchandise exported 

by Quick Advance, Inc. and produced 

by Ko’s Nail, Inc. because the estimated 

weighted-average final dumping margin 

calculated for this transaction channel 

was zero. Commerce calculated its 

dumping margin during the 

investigation based on sales of Quick 

Advance, Inc. that were produced by 

Ko’s Nail, Inc. Therefore, Quick 

Advance Inc.’s exclusion from 

antidumping duty liability and any cash 

deposit requirement pertains only to the 

channel(s) of sales that were examined 

by Commerce in the investigation. 

Therefore, for any subject merchandise 

exported by Quick Advance, Inc. that 

was produced by Ko’s Nail, Inc. during 

the POR, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate those POR entries, pertaining 

to the above-noted channel of sales, 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

However, for any entries of subject 

merchandise exported by Quick 

Advance Inc., and produced by 

companies other than Ko’s Nail Inc., or 

produced by Ko’s Nail Inc., and 

exported by companies other than 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
76016 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Notices 

13The all-others rate from the underlying 

investigation was revised in Certain Steel Nails 

from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in 

Harmony with Final Determination in Less than 

Fair Value Investigation and Notice of Amended 

Final Determination, 82 FR 55090, 55091 

(November 20, 2017). 

14Where Quick Advance Inc. is the exporter and 

Ko’s Nail Inc. is the producer, suspension of 

liquidation is not required. 

15Where Quick Advance Inc. is the exporter and 

Ko’s Nail Inc. is the producer, suspension of 

liquidation is not required. 

Quick Advance Inc., the assessment rate 

will be 78.17 percent. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit 

rate for the respondents noted above 

will be the rate established in the final 

results of this administrative review; (2) 

for merchandise exported by 

manufacturers or exporters not covered 

in this administrative review but 

covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding; 

(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 

in this review, a prior review, or the 

original investigation, but the producer 

is, then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the subject 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 2.16 

percent, the all-others rate in the lessthan-fair-value investigation.13

As noted above, no cash deposits are 

required for entries exported by Quick 

Advance, Inc. and produced by Ko’s 

Nail, Inc. However, for any entries of 

subject merchandise exported by Quick 

Advance, Inc. and produced by 

companies other than Ko’sNail, Inc. or 

produced by Ko’s Nail, Inc. and 

exported by companies other than 

Quick Advance, Inc., the cash deposit 

requirements in the above paragraph 

will apply. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 20, 2020. 

Jeffrey I. Kessler, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Commerce’s Calculation of the 

Review-Specific Rate for Non-Examined 

Companies 

Comment 2: Quick Advance Inc. and Ko’s 

Nail Inc. Exclusion From the Order 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II—List of Companies Under 

Review Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

1. All Precision Co., Ltd. 

2. Aplus Pneumatic Corp. 

3. Basso Industry Corporation 

4. Challenge Industrial Co., Ltd. 

5. Cheng Ch International Co. Ltd. 

6. Chia Pao Metal Co. Ltd. 

7. China Staple Enterprise Corporation 

8. Chite Enterprises Co., Ltd. 

9. Crown Run Industrial Corp. 

10. Da Yong Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

11. Daejin Steel Company Ltd. 

12. De Fasteners Inc. 

13. Dragon Iron Factory Co., Ltd. 

14. Easylink Industrial Co., Ltd. 

15. ECI Taiwan Co., Ltd. 

16. Encore Green Co., Ltd. 

17. Faithful Engineering Products Co. Ltd. 

18. Fastenal Asia Pacific Ltd. 

19. Four Winds Corporation 

20. Gaun Ting Technology Co., Ltd. 

21. General Merchandise Consolidators 

22. Ginfa World Co. Ltd. 

23. Gloex Inc. 

24. Home Value Co., Ltd. 

25. Hor Liang Industrial Corp. 

26. Hoyi Plus Co., Ltd. 

27. Integral Building Products Inc. 

28. Interactive Corp. 

29. J C Grand Corporation 

30. Jade Shuttle Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

31. Jau Yeou Industry Co., Ltd. 

32. Jen Ju Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

33. Jet Crown International Co., Ltd. 

34. Jiajue Industrial Co. Ltd. 

35. Jinsco International Corp. 

36. Ko’s Nail Inc.14

37. Korea Wire Co., Ltd. 

38. Liang Chyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. 

39. Linkwell Industry Co., Ltd. 

40. Locksure Inc. 

41. Long Ngyuen Trading & Service Co. 

42. Lu Kang Hand Tools Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(Prommer) 

43. Master United Corp. 

44. Maytrans International Corp. 

45. Ming Cheng Hardware Co., Ltd. 

46. Nailermate Enterprise Corporation 

47. Nailtech Co., Ltd. 

48. Newrex Screw Corporation 

49. NS International Ltd. 

50. Panther T&H Industry Co. 

51. Patek Tool Co., Ltd. 

52. Point Edge Corp. 

53. President Industrial Inc. 

54. Quick Advance Inc.15

55. Romp Coil Nail Industries Inc. 

56. Shinn Chuen Corp. 

57. Six-2 Fastener Imports Inc. 

58. Taiwan Shan Yin Int’l Co. Ltd. 

59. Taiwan Wakisangyo Co. Ltd. 

60. Techart Mechanical Corporation 

61. Test-Rite Int’l Co., Ltd. 

62. Theps Co., Ltd. 

63. Trans-Top Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

64. Trim International Inc. 

65. U-Can-Do Hardware Corp. 

66. UJL Industries Co., Ltd. 

67. Unicatch Industrial Co. Ltd. 

68. VIM International Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

69. Wattson Fastener Group Inc. 

70. Wictory Co. Ltd. 

71. Yeh Fong Hsin 

72. Yehdyi Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

73. Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd. 

74. Zhishan Xing Enterprise Co., Ltd. 

75. Zon Mon Co. Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2020–26231 Filed 11–25–20; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES