{00135623.DOC} 1 No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC 

Stipulation re Defendant Firbimatic’s Response to Plaintiff KFD’s Second and Third Amended Complaints 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HICKS

THOMAS LLP

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 388-0833 

Eric Grant (Bar No. 151064) 

grant@hicks-thomas.com 

Hicks Thomas LLP 

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 388-0833 

Facsimile: (916) 691-3261 

Paula Whitten (Bar No. 255811) 

pwhitten@hicks-thomas.com 

Hicks Thomas LLP 

700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2000 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Telephone: (713) 547-9100 

Facsimile: (713) 547-9150 

Counsel for Defendant FIRBIMATIC SpA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California 

corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITY OF EUREKA, et al., 

 Defendants, 

AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS 

AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC 

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 

REGARDING DEFENDANT FIRBIMATIC 

SpA’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF KFD 

ENTERPRISES, INC.’S SECOND AND 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINTS 

[Civil L.R. 7-12] 

 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, Plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc. (“KFD”) and Defendant Firbimatic SpA (“Firbimatic”) hereby stipulate and request judicial action as follows: 

 WHEREAS, KFD served its Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 122, filed Oct. 6, 2009) 

on Firbimatic on or about February 4, 2010; 

 WHEREAS, KFD subsequently sought this Court’s leave to file a Third Amended Complaint that would add a new claim against Firbimatic (Doc. 180, filed Feb. 12, 2010); and 

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 222 Filed 04/13/10 Page 1 of 2
{00135623.DOC} 2 No. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC 

Stipulation re Defendant Firbimatic’s Response to Plaintiff KFD’s Second and Third Amended Complaints 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HICKS

THOMAS LLP

8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 388-0833 

 WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy, KFD and Firbimatic desire 

to minimize the number of filings in this matter, 

 THEREFORE, KFD and Firbimatic stipulate that 

 (1) If the Court grants KFD’s pending motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint, Firbimatic shall have thirty-five (35) days to respond to such complaint after it is filed; 

 (2) If the Court denies KFD’s pending motion for leave, Firbimatic shall have thirtyfive (35) days after such denial to respond to KFD’s Second Amended Complaint; and 

 (3) Firbimatic shall serve its initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(1) at the 

same time as it files its response to KFD’s outstanding complaint as set forth above. 

 Dated: April 12, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Eric Grant 

Eric Grant 

Paula Whitten 

Hicks Thomas LLP 

Counsel for Defendant FIRBIMATIC SpA 

(The filer hereby attests that concurrence in

the filing of this document has been obtained 

from the signatory below.) 

GREBEN & ASSOCIATES 

/s/ Jan A. Greben 

Jan A. Greben 

Danielle De Smeth 

Attorneys for Plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc., 

a California corporation, dba Norman’s Dry 

Cleaner

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April _____, 2010. 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

United States District Judge 

13

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 222 Filed 04/13/10 Page 2 of 2