Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Order

CASE NO. C08-04725

1 n:\lit\li2008\090463\00619106.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961

Chief Trial Deputy 

SEAN F. CONNOLLY, State Bar #152235 

DANIEL A. ZAHEER, State Bar #237118 

Deputy City Attorneys 

Fox Plaza 

1390 Market Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94102-5408 

Telephone: (415) 554-3863 

Facsimile: (415) 554-3837 

E-Mail: sean.connolly@sfgov.org 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MALEHKI LOHARSINGH, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CITY & COUNTY OF SAN 

FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; 

HEATHER FONG in her capacity as 

Chief for SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; OFFICERS TRAPSI 

#1991, NEVES #1016, and FRANCO 

#1443, individually and in their capacities 

as SAN FRANCISCO POLICE 

DEPARTMENT; and DOES 1-100, 

inclusive; individually and in their 

capacities as Officers of SAN 

FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. C08-04725 JCS 

CORRECTED STIPULATION OF 

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] 

ORDER

Trial Date: April 26, 2010 

Case 3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document 71 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document70 Filed03/26/10 Page1 of 3
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Order

CASE NO. C08-04725

2 n:\lit\li2008\090463\00619106.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The undersigned parties, being all the parties who have appeared in this action, STIPULATE 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), that the action on behalf of plaintiff MALEKI 

LOHARSINGH against City And County Of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, 

HEATHER FONG, Police Officers TRAPSI, NEVES, and FRANCO is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. As a condition of DISMISSAL it is further STIPULATED that plaintiff and 

defendants shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: March 26, 2010 

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN L. BURRIS 

JOHN L. BURRIS 

BENJAMIN NISENBAUM 

By: /s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum

BENJAMIN NISENBAUM 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

**Pursuant to General Order 45, §X.B., the filer of this 

document attests that s/he has received the concurrence 

of this signatory to file this document. 

Dated: March 26, 2010 

DENNIS J. HERRERA 

City Attorney 

JOANNE HOEPER 

Chief Trial Deputy 

SEAN F. CONNOLLY 

DANIEL A. ZAHEER 

Deputy City Attorneys 

By: /s/ Sean F. Connolly

SEAN F. CONNOLLY 

Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF 

SAN FRANCISCO 

Case 3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document 71 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document70 Filed03/26/10 Page2 of 3
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Order

CASE NO. C08-04725

3 n:\lit\li2008\090463\00619106.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ______________________ 

By: 

HON. JAMES C. SPERO 

Case3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document70 Filed03/26/10 Page3 of 3

March 29, 2010 JOSEPH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-04725-JCS Document 71 Filed 03/29/10 Page 3 of 3