alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 218

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 218 appear at 68 FR 51363, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 218.02 To what programs or activities do these regulations apply?

These regulations apply to each foreign affairs agency recipient and to each program or activity in the United States operated by the recipient which receives Federal financial assistance provided by any of these agencies.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2575 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2575

    To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl thioglycolate (MTG).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl thioglycolate (MTG).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL THIOGLYCOLATE (MTG).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.55 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl thioglycolate (MTG)) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Nelson Gomez, Appellant, v Melvin L. Hollis, as Superintendent of Oneida Correctional Facility, Department of Correctional Services, State of New York, et al., Respondents.

[714 NYS2d 826]

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), entered February 22, 2000 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for lack of standing.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit possessing contraband, smuggling and *552drug possession in connection with a March 14, 1999 visit with his wife. In addition to other penalties, petitioner’s right to visitation was revoked for 11 years. Thereafter, petitioner’s wife was notified that her visitation privileges with petitioner had been revoked as a result of the drug-smuggling incident and petitioner’s guilty plea to the charges stemming therefrom. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination revoking his wife’s visitation privileges. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding and this appeal ensued.

We agree with Supreme Court that petitioner confuses his disciplinary determination with the separate determination which revoked his wife’s visitation privileges pursuant to 7 NYCRR part 200 (see, *Matter of Inman v Coughlin,*156 AD2d 786). The fact that petitioner did not challenge his disciplinary determination does not give him standing to challenge the revocation of his wife’s visitation nor to protest the implication that she was involved in the drug-smuggling incident. Moreover, petitioner’s wife failed to avail herself of the procedure to contest the revocation of visitation privileges despite being notified of the opportunity to do so.

Finally, we reject petitioner’s conclusory assertion that the termination of his wife’s visitation rights violated his due process rights.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 51.55 Execution fee not refundable.

The fee for the execution of a passport application is not refundable.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Matthew Saba, Respondent, v Gene Adam's Refrigerated Trucking et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed November 6, 1975. In 1953 claimant sustained a back injury resulting in his disablement from work until 1955. In April, 1967 claimant again sustained a back injury which was found to be compensable. In December, 1967, he was involved in an automobile accident wherein he sustained a noncompensable acute lumbosacral back strain. While at home on February 3, 1974, claimant was bending over, sneezed, and experienced back pain requiring medical attention. The board found that the incident on February 3, 1974 was a recurrence of disability causally related to the accidental injury which occurred in April, 1967. It was also found by the board that claimant was totally disabled and that his disability was one-third causally related to the 1953 accidental injury and two-thirds causally related to the accidental injury of April, 1967. On this appeal appellants argue that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s decision in that the board failed to consider the significance of claimant’s injuries resulting from the automobile accident in 1967. Claimant’s attending physician, however, testified that "any residual today would not be related to the auto accident of 12/30/67.” Apportionment of an award presents a factual issue for the board *(Matter of Rados v Woodlawn Water Supply Dist.,*31 *859AD2d 879). In reaching its conclusions the board is free to accept or reject so much of the medical testimony as it found credible *(Matter of Carbonaro v Chinatown Sea Food,*55 AD2d 756). The resolution of conflicting medical ' opinions is solely within the province of the board *(Matter of Bohn v Taiwan Rest.,*58 AD2d 903). Since the board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, it must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Staley, Jr. and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999

<CASH>                                            259,652
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,393,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                6,138,507
<PP&E>                                         76,068,460
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,393,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,572,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,237,321
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           77,586
<OTHER-SE>                                     36,657,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,572,164
<SALES>                                         3,542,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,542,188
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,820,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (38,326)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (305,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (305,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (305,488)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.04)


        


</TABLE>
### §3174. Provision of comprehensive economic development strategies to Regional Commissions

If any part of an economic development district is in a region covered by 1 or more of the Regional Commissions, the economic development district shall ensure that a copy of the comprehensive economic development strategy of the district is provided to the affected Regional Commission.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title IV, §404, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3609; amended Pub. L. 108–373, title IV, §402(a), Oct. 27, 2004, 118 Stat. 1768.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 404 of Pub. L. 89–136 was classified to section 3172 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(a).

#### Amendments

2004—Pub. L. 108–373 amended section catchline and text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "If any part of an economic development district is in the Appalachian region (as defined in section 403 of the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40 U.S.C. App.)), the economic development district shall ensure that a copy of the comprehensive economic development strategy of the district is provided to the Appalachian Regional Commission established under that Act."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001020871
<NAME> ON COMMAND CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,306
<PP&E>                                         278,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,610
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           302
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,144
<SALES>                                         61,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,233
<CGS>                                           27,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,839)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,882)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,882)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dwight Tippins, Appellant.

On the court’s own motion, the decision handed down September 26, 1960 *(ante,*p. 955), is amended by striking out the designation of Leonard H. Kaplan, Esq., as counsel to prosecute the appeal, and by designating Nathaniel Seligman, Esq., 50 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, as such counsel. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
§ 201.23 Borrower's initial payment. ( a ) *General requirement.* The borrower shall be responsible for the payment in cash of any costs that will not be paid, or are not eligible to be paid, from the proceeds of the loan. Such costs payable by the borrower may include any required downpayment, any discount points to be paid by the borrower to the lender, any other fees and charges that may not be financed, and any other costs in excess of the loan amount. No part of such costs payable by the borrower may be loaned, advanced, or paid to or for the benefit of the borrower by the dealer, the manufacturer, or any other party to the loan transaction. If the borrower obtains all or any part of such costs through a gift or a loan from some other source, the borrower must disclose the source of such gift or loan on the credit application. Any such loan must be secured by property or collateral owned by the borrower independently of the property securing repayment of the Title I loan, unless the prior approval of the Secretary is obtained for an exception to this requirement. The lender shall consider any such loan obligation in performing the credit investigation. Documentation of any initial payment shall be retained by the lender in the loan file.
( b ) *Manufactured home purchase loans.* In the case of a manufactured home purchase loan, the borrower shall make a minimum cash downpayment of at least five percent of the purchase price of the home. The borrower's equity in an existing manufactured home and any movable appurtenances may be traded-in on a new home and accepted in lieu of full or partial cash downpayment, but without any cash payment to the borrower. The existing manufactured home being traded-in shall be clearly identified, and the borrower's equity in the home shall be based upon the retail value of the home and appurtenances (as determined by a HUD-approved appraisal), less the total of all loans outstanding on the home and appurtenances.
( c ) *Manufactured home lot loans.* In the case of a manufactured home lot loan, the borrower shall make a minimum cash downpayment of at least five percent of the total of the purchase price and development costs for the lot.
( d ) *Combination loans.* In the case of a combination loan, the borrower shall make a minimum cash downpayment of at least five percent of the purchase price of the manufactured home and lot. If the borrower already owns a manufactured home or a lot on which a manufactured home is to be placed, the borrower's equity in such home or lot may be accepted in lieu of full or partial cash downpayment on a combination loan, but without any cash payment to the borrower.
[61 FR 19798, May 2, 1996]
### §6911a. Assistant Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency; appointment, etc.

The Assistant Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency appointed to head the Office of Solid Waste shall be in addition to the five Assistant Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency provided for in section 1(d) of Reorganization Plan Numbered 3 of 1970 and the additional Assistant Administrator provided by the Toxic Substances Control Act [15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.], shall be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 96–510, title III, §307(b), Dec. 11, 1980, 94 Stat. 2810; Pub. L. 98–80, §2(c)(2)(B), Aug. 23, 1983, 97 Stat. 485.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Reorganization Plan Numbered 3 of 1970, referred to in text, is set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

The Toxic Substances Control Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 94–469, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2003, which is classified generally to chapter 53 (§2601 et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2601 of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, and not as part of the Solid Waste Disposal Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 98–80 struck out ", and shall be compensated at the rate provided for Level IV of the Executive Schedule pay rates under section 5315 of title 5" after "advice and consent of the Senate".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 11, 1980, see section 9652 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11428-11429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04420]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9013-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/

Weekly Receipt of Environmental Impact Statements

Filed 02/18/2014 Through 02/21/2014 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    NOTICE: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html

EIS No. 20140046, Draft EIS, USFS, CO, Eldora Mountain Resort Ski Area 
Projects, Comment Period Ends: 04/14/2014, Contact: Paul Alford 303-
541-2506
EIS No. 20140047, Final Supplement, USAF, FL, F-35 Beddown at Eglin Air 
Force Base, Review Period Ends: 03/31/2014, Contact: Michael Spaits 
850-882-2836
EIS No. 20140048, Draft EIS, USFS, NM, Southwest Jemez Mountains 
Landscape Restoration Project, Comment Period Ends: 04/15/2014, 
Contact: Chris Napp 505-438-5448
EIS No. 20140049, Final EIS, USFS, ID, Beaver Creek, Review Period 
Ends: 04/08/2014, Contact: Clinton Scott 208-769-3030
EIS No. 20140050, Draft EIS, NRC, OH, GENERIC--License Renewal of 
Nuclear Plants Regarding Davis-Besse Nuclear Station, Comment Period 
Ends: 04/14/2014, Contact: Elaine Keegan 301-415-8517
EIS No. 20140051, Draft EIS, DOI, UT, Provo River Delta Restoration 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 05/07/2014, Contact: Richard Mingo 801-
524-3168
EIS No. 20140052, Final EIS, BLM, NM, Ochoa Mine Project, Review Period 
Ends: 03/31/2014, Contact: Shiva Achet 575-234-5924

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140001, Draft EIS, APHIS, 00, Determinations of Nonregulated 
Status for 2, 4-D-Resistant Corn and Soybean Varieties, Comment Period 
Ends: 03/11/2014, Contact: Sid Abel 301-734-6352

    Revision to FR Notice Published 01/03/2014; Comment Period will 
remain open through 03/11/2014, per request of the lead agency.

EIS No. 20140038, Draft Supplement, NMFS, 00, Fishery Management Plan 
for Regulating Offshore Marine Aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico, 
Comment Period Ends: 04/04/2014, Contact: Jess Beck-Stimpert 727-551-
5755

    Revision to FR Notice Published 02/07/2014; Extending Comment 
Period from 3/31/2014 to 4/04/2014

EIS No. 20140043, Draft EIS, USFS, UT, Energy Gateway South 
Transmission Project, Comment Period Ends: 05/22/2014, Contact: Kenton 
Call 435-865-3730

[[Page 11429]]

    Revision to FR Notice Published 02/14/2014; Correcting Lead Agency 
from AFS to USFS.

    Dated: February 25, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-04420 Filed 2-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### J. M. Connery, appellant, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company and The Pennsylvania Company, appellees.

Gen. No. 25,021.

Action for damages to a shipment. Action dismissed. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Harry Olson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first *667district at the March term, 1923.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 26, 1923.

J. M. Connery, *pro se,*for appellant; Charles H. Gorman, of counsel. Loesch, Scofield, Loesch & Richards, for appellees; Theodore Schmidt, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2702 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 4-amino5-hydroxy-3,6-bis[[4-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]ph enyl]azo]-, 

tetrasodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 4-amino-5-hydroxy-3,6- 

bis[[4-[[2-(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]ph enyl]azo]-, 

tetrasodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 4-AMINO4 5-HYDROXY-3,6-BIS[[4-[[2- 

5 (SULFOOXY)ETHYL]SULFONYL]PHENYL]AZO]-, 

6 TETRASODIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
2 

•HR 2702 IH 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.19 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid, 4-amino-5-hydroxy-3,6- 

bis[[4-[[2- 

(sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]-, 

tetrasodium salt (CAS No. 

17095–24–8) (provided for 

in subheading 3204.16.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1297

WILLIAM LUTHER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GARY LOCKE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:09-cv-00748-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 26, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Luther, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Luther appeals the district court’s order 

granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil action. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. See Luther v. Locke, No. 1:09-cv-00748-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. 

Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED