alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL KLINE,

Plaintiff,

 v.

 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

Defendant. /

No. C 09-00742 SI

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff’s motion for enforcement of collateral estoppel has been denied and defendant’s motion

for summary judgment has ben granted. Accordingly, judgment is entered in favor of defendant and

against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: April 7, 2010 

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:09-cv-00742-SI Document 92 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,615,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,471,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,298,498
<PP&E>                                       3,263,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,770,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,716,060
<BONDS>                                         66,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,591
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,890,418
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,770,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,443,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,729,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             740,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,026,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                323,346
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,349,625)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 72.3 Exceptions.

If a consular office learns that a United States citizen or non-citizen national employee or dependent of an employee of a member of the United States Armed Forces, or a United States citizen or non-citizen national employee of another department or agency or a dependent of such an employee, or a Peace Corps volunteer as defined in 22 U.S.C. 1504(a) or dependent of a Peace Corps volunteer has died while in the officer's consular district while the employee or volunteer is on assignment abroad, the officer should notify the Department. The consular officer should not attempt to notify the next of kin (or legal guardian) and legal representative of the death, but rather should assist, as needed, the appropriate military, other department of agency or Peace Corps authorities in making notifications of death with respect to such individual.
### §7385o. Repealed. Pub. L. 108–375, div. C, title XXXI, §3162(i), Oct. 28, 2004, 118 Stat. 2186

Section, Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [div. C, title XXXVI, §3661], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–512, authorized Secretary of Energy to enter agreements with States to provide assistance to Department of Energy contractor employees in filing claims under the appropriate State workers' compensation system.
Order entered February 10 , 20 20

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00151

- CV

INLAND WESTERN DALLA S LINCOLN PARK LIMIT ED PARTNERSHIP AND R PAI

SOUTHWEST MANAGEMENT , LL C, Appellant s

V.

HAI NGUYEN AND MAI N GUYEN, INDIVIDUALS, D/B/A ROMIE'S NAIL BOUTIQUE, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 08114



### O RDER Before the Court En Banc

Before the Court is a pp ellees ’ January 9, 2019 motion for en banc reconsideration

. Appellees ’ motion is DENIED

.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Bur ns, C.J., Dissenting, joined by Molberg, J., Partida

- Kipness, J., and Nowel l, J. Schenck, J, Concurring, joined by Bridges, J., a nd Evans, J.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Thermal-Hydraulic Phenomena will hold a 
meeting on January 26, 2005, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Wednesday, January 26, 2005--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of 
business.
    The Subcommittee will review the application for an 8.5% power 
uprate for the Waterford Nuclear Power Station. The Subcommittee will 
hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the 
NRC staff and Entergy Nuclear South regarding this matter. The 
Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and 
facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, 
for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Ralph Caruso (Telephone: 301-415-8065) five days prior to the meeting, 
if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic 
recordings will be permitted.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 
p.m. (e.t.). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to 
contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to 
the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda.

    Dated: December 15, 2004.
John H. Flack,
Acting Branch Chief, ACRS/ACNW.
[FR Doc. 04-27844 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

CHRISTINE Y. WONG (NYBN 3988607)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 436-7301

Facsimile: (415) 436-6753

E-Mail: Christine.Wong@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RONY ALBERTO AVILA-QUIJANO,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. 09-01146 MHP

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER DOCUMENTING WAIVER

On December 7, 2009, defendant Rony Alberto Avila-Quijano appeared with his counsel,

Alan Dressler, Esq., before the Honorable Marilyn H. Patel for status conference. The Court

scheduled the next status conference for January 25, 2009, and ordered the exclusion of time

based on effective preparation of counsel. On January 25, 2010, the defendant appeared with his

counsel before the Court for a status conference. The next status conference before the Court

was scheduled for February 22, 2010, at 10 a.m. 

With the agreement of the parties and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters

Case 3:09-cr-01146-MHP Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

this order confirming the exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act from December 7, 2010

through February 22, 2010. The parties agree and stipulate to the above facts, and the Court

finds and holds, as follows:

1. The ends of justice served by excluding the period from December 7, 2010, to

February 22, 2010 from Speedy Trial Act calculations outweighs the interests of the public and

the defendant to a speedy trial, by ensuring the effective preparation of counsel, in accordance

with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B).

STIPULATED:

DATED: January 25, 2010 /s/ 

ALAN DRESSLER, ESQ.

Attorney for RONY ALBERTO AVILA-QUIJANO

DATED: January 25, 2010 /s/ 

CHRISTINE Y. WONG

Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January __, 2010 

HON. MARILYN H. PATEL

United States District Judge

26

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:09-cr-01146-MHP Document 15 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2
;

County
‘County

a aan

Sweetwater
Carbon

‘a

Rawlins Field

Office Area

Rawins

_84ratoga

“oEncampment

CG

Carbon County)
‘Albany County|

ine Bow

Peck River

—s
g

Albany County

Laramie County|

—

5
é

Oo 20 40 80 120 160 200
ed
Kilometers

OQ 10 20 40 60 80 100
El

Miles

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

«Banos

Map 1-1

Overview
cicn_ex42.htm


Exhibit 4.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO


SHORT TERM CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE







This Amendment No. 2 to Short Term Convertible Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made as of September 30, 2010, between Cicero Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and SOAdesk, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holder”).







W I T N E S S E T H:







WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2010, and amended on March 31, 2010, between the Company, Holder and Vertical Thought, Inc., the Company delivered to Holder a $700,000 principal amount Short Term Convertible Promissory Note, which Short Term Convertible Promissory Note was subsequently amended on March 31, 2010 (as so amended to date, the “Note”); and







WHEREAS, the Company and Holder desire to further amend the Note as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1.           Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Note.







2.           The “Maturity Date” of the Note is hereby extended to March 31, 2011, and the Holder hereby waives any and all Events of Default under the Note prior to the date hereof.







3.           Except as specifically set forth herein, the Note and all of its terms and conditions remain in full force and effect, and the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, except that on or after the date of this Amendment all references in the Note to “this Note,” “hereto,” “hereof,” “hereunder,” or words of like import shall mean the Note as amended by this Amendment.







4.           This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







5.           This Amendment and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.


 


6.           This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto.


 


 



[remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows]


 






  





  











  






 



Exhibit 4.2


 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 





	 	CICERO INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: 	 
	 	 	Title: 	 
	 	 	 	 







 


 



	 	SOADESK, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: 	 
	 	 	Title: 	 
	 	 	 	 





 



 


Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Short Term Convertible Promissory Note
#### BIEHN, Appellant, v. THILL et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Martin J. Biehn against Nicholas E. Thill and others. No opinion. Motion denied.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORINNE SHEA,

Plaintiff,

v

INCISIVE MEDIA, a foreign

corporation,

Defendant. /

No C 09-1110 VRW

ORDER

On March 15, 2010, plaintiff’s counsel, citing a

“breakdown of the attorney-client relationship,” filed a motion to

withdraw as counsel for plaintiff. Doc #24. Defendant, on April

22, filed a statement of non-opposition to plaintiff’s counsel’s

motion. Doc #29.

//

//

Case 3:09-cv-01110-VRW Document 30 Filed 04/27/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Having considered the matter, the court GRANTS

plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, Doc #24, provided that,

pursuant to Civ LR 11-5(b), counsel shall continue to accept papers

for forwarding purposes until plaintiff appears by other counsel or

pro se. The above-captioned matter is hereby CONTINUED until July

1, 2010 so that plaintiff may retain new counsel. 

Defendant is ORDERED to file, on or before July 15, 2010,

a five-page case management statement and proposed schedule

pursuant to Civ LR 16-9. Plaintiff shall file a reply of no more

than five pages to defendant’s case management statement on or

before July 22, 2010. 

The previous scheduling orders, Doc ##17, 18 and 23, are

VACATED, as is the hearing scheduled for May 13, 2010.

The parties are ORDERED to attend a case management

conference on August 5, 2010 at 3:30 PM, at which time the court

will set a new case management schedule. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:09-cv-01110-VRW Document 30 Filed 04/27/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 15.1 General provisions. ( a ) *Scope.* Requests for material from HUD will be processed as set forth in this part. The Federal Housing Administration and the Government National Mortgage Association are components of HUD and are also covered by this part.
( b ) *Subpart B.* Subpart B of this part contains the rules that HUD follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552). These rules should be read together with the FOIA, which provides additional information about access to records maintained by HUD. Information routinely provided to the public as part of a regular Department activity may be provided to the public without following this subpart.
( c ) *Subpart C.* Subpart C of this part describes the procedures to be followed and standards to be applied in processing demands for the production of material or provision of testimony in legal proceedings among private litigants.
( d ) *Subpart D.* Subpart D of this part describes the procedures to be followed and standards to be applied in processing demands for the production of material or provision of testimony in legal proceedings in which the United States is a party.
( e ) *Inspector General.* Subparts B and C of this part do not apply to the Office of Inspector General. The procedures that apply to the Office of Inspector General are described in parts 2002 and 2004 of this title.
114 STAT. 866 PUBLIC LAW 106–282—OCT. 6, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 110:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

Oct. 3, considered and passed House.

Oct. 4, 5, considered and passed Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 36 (2000):

Oct. 6, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 106–282

106th Congress

Joint Resolution

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other

purposes.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law

106–275 is amended by striking ‘‘October 6, 2000’’ in section 106(c)

and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘October 14, 2000’’.

Approved October 6, 2000.

Ante, p. 810.

Oct. 6, 2000

[H.J. Res. 110]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Genetic Pathway to SLE.
    Date: January 12, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3143, Bethesda, MD 20817; (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kenneth E. Santora, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616; 301-496-2550; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6209115053540b220c0b0a4c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="442f377675722d042a2d2c6a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, SLE Pathogenesis.
    Date: January 13, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3265, Bethesda, MD 20817; (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kenneth E. Santora, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616; 301-496-2550; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#244f571615124d644a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2c9d1909394cbe2cccbca8cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: December 20, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-28306 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael F. Markowski, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, rendered March 11, 1960, convicting him of assault in the third degree, suspending sentence, and placing him on probation. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
#### § 134.28 Further Department of State review.

Either the applicant or Department of State counsel may seek review of the initial decision. If neither the applicant nor the Department of State counsel seeks review, the initial decision shall become a final decision of the Department of State 30 days after it is issued. If review is taken the Judicial Officer will issue a final decision on the application or remand the application to the adjudicative officer for further proceedings.
### §8262h. United States Postal Service energy regulations

#### (a) In general

The Postmaster General shall issue regulations to ensure the reliable and accurate accounting of energy consumption costs for all buildings or facilities which it owns, leases, operates, or manages. Such regulations shall—

(1) establish a monitoring system to determine which facilities are the most costly to operate on an energy consumption per square foot basis or other relevant analytical basis;

(2) identify unusual or abnormal changes in energy consumption; and

(3) check the accuracy of utility charges for electricity and gas consumption.

#### (b) Identification of energy efficiency products

The Postmaster General shall actively undertake a program to identify and procure energy efficiency products for use in its facilities. In carrying out this subsection, the Postmaster General shall, to the maximum extent practicable, incorporate energy efficient information available on Federal Supply Schedules maintained by the General Services Administration and the Defense Logistics Agency.

(Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §163, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2860.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and not as part of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### United States Postal Service Building Energy Survey and Report

Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §164, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2860, directed Postmaster General to conduct an energy survey, as defined in 42 U.S.C. 8259(5), for purposes of determining maximum potential cost effective energy savings that may be achieved in a representative sample of buildings owned or leased by United States Postal Service in different areas of the country, making recommendations for cost effective energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements in those buildings and in other similar United States Postal Service buildings, and identifying barriers which may prevent the United States Postal Service from complying with energy management goals, and further directed Postmaster General to transmit to Congress within 180 days after Oct. 24, 1992, a plan for implementing this survey, and to report to Congress on the findings and conclusions of such survey as soon as practicable after its completion.