alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4852b. National consultation on lead-based paint hazard reduction

In carrying out this chapter, the Secretary shall consult on an ongoing basis with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control, other Federal agencies concerned with lead poisoning prevention, and the task force established pursuant to section 4852a of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1016, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3909.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning title X of Pub. L. 102–550, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3897, known as the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4851 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Centers for Disease Control changed to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by Pub. L. 102–531, title III, §312, Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3504.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503

January 4,2012 Diane E. Austin, Ph.D. Chair, Good Neighbor Environmental Board Associate Research Anthropologist, Bureau ofApplied Research in Anthropology, University ofArizona P.O. Box 210030, Tucson, AZ 85719 Dear Chair Austin, Thank you for your September 2011 letterpresenting your position thatthe United States, as a party of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), should work withthe other signatories, Mexico and Canada, tocome to an agreement on Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (TElA). We appreciate the Good Neighbor Environmental Board's (GNEB) attention to and views onthis matter. The ObamaAdministration is committed to strengthening multilateral cooperation in orderto achieve high levels ofenvironmental quality. The United States strivesto foster open communication with its North American neighbors regarding projects with potential or identified transboundary environmental impacts. That said, we recognize the concerns included in the GNEB'srecent letter and agree thatthe TEIA issue should be revisited. In the past, differences among the federal structures ofthe three parties ofthe NAAEC presented significantchallenges to achieving a TEIA agreement. The United States believes it is appropriate to take a fresh look at this issue and has initiated discussions on the subjectwith our Canadian andMexican partners, withthe goal ofidentifying a new and effective approach. Consistent with this view, the White House Council on Environmental Quality also will continue to work with the appropriate federal departments and agencies to facilitate increased collaboration onborderenvironmental issues. Thank you again for the GNEB's ongoing work along the U.S.-Mexico border and attention tothe issue ofTransboundary Environmental Impact Assessments. We look forward to working with you as we continuethese important discussions.

Nancy 

### H. Sutley Chair

cc: Lisa P. Jackson Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CynthiaJones-Jackson Acting Director, Office ofFederal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting date change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Thursday, July 8, 2004 (69 FR 41231), the Department of 
Defense announced closed meetings of the Defense Science Board (DSB) 
Task Force on Future Strategic Strike Forces. The meeting originally 
scheduled for December 15-16, 2004, has been moved to December 14-16, 
2004. The meeting will be held at Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson 
Boulevard, Suite 500, Arlington, VA.

    Dated: November 29, 2004.
Jeannette Owings-Ballard,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 04-28261 Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Rogers v. Lake County, et al [C 08 4395 THE] Stipulation re Modification of Scheduling Order Page 1

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290

Sacramento, CA 95822

(916) 456-1122

(916) 737-1126 (fax)

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333

Attorneys for defendants

DENISE JOHNSON, MORGAN HERMANN

and LAKE COUNTY (erroneously sued herein 

as “Animal Control & Care Department, County of Lake”)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TEASHA ROGERS, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

DENISE JOHNSON; MORGAN

HERMANN; ANIMAL CONTROL & CARE

DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF LAKE,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: C 08 04395 THE

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING

ORDER

[FED.R.CIV. PRO § 16(b)]

Trial Date: June 15, 2010

It is hereby stipulated among the parties that the Scheduling Order of 

January 26, 2009 be modified to reflect a new trial date the week of 

September 27, 2010, with the pretrial deadlines regarding the date of the pretrial

conference and the filing of the pretrial conference statement to be adjusted according

to the new trial date. This stipulation is made on the ground that there is an order from

defendant DENISE JOHNSON’s physician attesting to her inability to participate in a

//

//

//

//

Case 3:08-cv-04395-TEH Document 39 Filed 05/13/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Rogers v. Lake County, et al [C 08 4395 THE] Stipulation re Modification of Scheduling Order Page 2

 trial until on or after August 1, 2010. The physician’s note is attached hereto as 

Exhibit “A”.

Dated: May 10, 2010 NEVIN & ABSALOM

By: /s/ Kenneth C/ Absalom 

KENNETH C. ABSALOM, CSB #114607

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: May 10, 2010 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ Martha M. Stringer 

MARTHA M. STRINGER, CSB #156333

Attorneys for defendants DENISE JOHNSON,

MORGAN HERMANN and LAKE COUNTY 

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties have stipulated to a modification of the scheduling order of 

January 26, 2009 and good cause for such a modification has been shown. The new

trial date will be September ________, 2010 at 8:30 a.m. 

The pretrial conference will be held on __________________________. 

Lead counsel who will try the case shall meet and confer at least 30 days before

the pretrial conference.

The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement no later than 10

calendar days before the pretrial conference. The remainder of the January 26, 2009,

scheduling order remains in effect.

Dated: __________________________________________

JUDGE OF THE UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

05/12/10 October 12 September 27, 2010 at 3:00 PM

Case 3:08-cv-04395-TEH Document 39 Filed 05/13/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 502.2 Definitions. *As used in this part:* ( a ) *Media entity* means any person or entity, that actively gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the public, turns gathered information into a distinct work, or distributes that work to an audience within the United States, and otherwise serves the purposes described in § 502.4.
( b ) *Organization* means any corporation, trust, association, cooperative, or other group organized primarily for scientific, educational, service, charitable, or similar purpose, including but not limited to institutions of higher education, and otherwise serves the purposes described in § 502.4.
( c ) *Program materials* means radio broadcasts, television broadcasts, and Internet content that the Agency disseminates to audiences outside of the United States, pursuant to: The U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461 et seq.); The U.S. International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.); The Radio Broadcasting to Cuba Act (22 U.S.C. 1465 et seq.); or The Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act (22 U.S.C. 1465aa et seq.).
( d ) *Requestor* means any private person or entity within the United States that requests program materials from the Agency.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lymónd Stephenson, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 12, 1977, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Earl R. Jones, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Permission to prosecute appeal as a poor person granted. Appeal may be perfected upon one typewritten copy of the record and five typewritten copies of the brief. Time to perfect appeal extended 90 days. Motion in all other respects denied.
### §5676. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5676 was editorially reclassified as section 11186 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 1507.4 Conditions of disclosure. The Foundation will not disclose any record contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person or any other agency except by written request or prior written consent of the individual to whom the record pertains or his or her agent or attorney, unless such disclosure is: ( a ) To those officers and employees of the Foundation who have a need for the records in the official performance of their duties;
( b ) Required under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552);
( c ) For a routine use of the record compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;
( d ) To the Bureau of the Census for purpose of planning or carrying out a census or survey or related activity pursuant to title 13, United States Code;
( e ) To a recipient who has provided the Foundation with advance adequate written assurance that the record will be used solely as a statistical research or reporting record, and the record is to be transferred to a form that is not individually identifiable;
( f ) To the National Archives of the United States as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the U.S. Government, or for evaluation by the Administrator of General Services, or designee, to determine whether the record has such value;
( g ) To another agency or to an instrumentality of any governmental jurisdiction within or under the control of the United States for a civil or criminal law enforcement activity if the activity is authorized by law, and if the head of the agency or instrumentality has made a written request to the Foundation specifying the particular portion desired and the law enforcement activity for which the record is sought;
( h ) To a person, pursuant to a showing of compelling circumstances affecting the health or safety of an individual, if, promptly following such disclosure, notification is transmitted to the last known address of the individual to whom the record pertains;
( i ) To either House of Congress, or, to the extent of matters within its jurisdiction, any committee or subcommittee thereof, any joint committee of Congress or subcommittee of any such joint committee;
( j ) To the Comptroller General, or any authorized representative, in the course of the performance of the duties of the General Accounting Office; or
( k ) Pursuant to the order of a court of competent jurisdiction. If any record disclosed under compulsory legal process is subsequently made public by the court which issued it, the Foundation must make a reasonable effort to notify the individual to whom the record pertains of such disclosure.
( l ) To consumer reporting agencies as defined in 31 U.S.C. 370(a)(3) in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3711, and under contracts for collection services as authorized in 31 U.S.C. 3718.
VISUAL RESOURCE IMPACTS VIEW FROM CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL

EXISTING

wax National Park Service

ARK
stavice

Ct



VISUAL RESOURCE IMPACTS VIEW FROM C&O CANAL TOWPATH (PEAK)

ALTERNATIVE C- PREFERRED ALT

‘ano National Park Service

Ct



JAL RESOURCE IMPACTS VIEW FROM C&O CANAL TOWPATH (PEAK)

wax National Park Service

stavice

Ct
### §4551. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–616, title I, §101, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1848; Pub. L. 93–282, title II, §203(a), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 135; Pub. L. 96–180, §3, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §966(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 595, which established the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, was redesignated section 502 of the Public Health Service Act by Pub. L. 98–24, §2(b)(3), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 177, and is classified to section 290aa–1 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          56,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,719
<PP&E>                                         577,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 715,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,469
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           351
<OTHER-SE>                                     414,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   715,951
<SALES>                                         32,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,213
<CGS>                                           20,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:08-cv-02036-CRB   Document 11   Filed 04/08/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:08-cv-02036-CRB   Document 11   Filed 04/08/10   Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,686
<INVENTORY>                                     10,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,557
<PP&E>                                          53,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,551
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,637
<SALES>                                        128,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,710
<CGS>                                          118,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
#### §§ 530.104-530.109 [Reserved]
April 22 , 20 16

Andrew Pierce, ASI

AFS

- 250, FAA

Room 831

800 Independence Ave. SW

Washington, DC 20591

202

- 267

- 8238

TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc. would like to withdrawal its duplicated petition for exemption posted to

the docket on 3/02/2016, TEMS CO would like for you to precede with the petition submitted on

05/20/2015.

Sincerely,

TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc.

Joseph R. Hicks

Director of Operations

907

- 225

- 5141
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2610 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2610

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Mefenoxam Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Terry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Mefenoxam Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEFENOXAM TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.90.14      Mefenoxam           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Technical - (R,S)-                                                 31/2008
                         2-[(2,6-
                         dimethylphenyl]-
                         methoxyacetylamin
                         o]-propionic acid
                         methyl ester (CAS
                         Nos. 70630-17-0
                         and 69516-34-3)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2924.29.47)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Beginning ReadingEmergent LiteracyHigh Risk StudentsInterpersonal CompetenceLanguage AcquisitionLiteracy EducationPreschool ChildrenPreschool EducationReading SkillsResource MaterialsStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00155-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.R.S.U., A CHILD

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-2405-4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 12, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that we have not 

received the docketing statement and that this appeal would be dismissed if the 

docketing statement was not filed within twenty-one days of the date of the letter. No 

response has been received from Appellant. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed September 22, 2021

[CV06]
### §3796ii–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ii–1 was editorially reclassified as section 10472 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Docket No. FAA-2013-0370