Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2004 / Notices 77775

online at http://www.nps.gov/piro.htm.

With the concurrence of the NPS 

Director, the wilderness proposal will 

be sent to the Assistant Secretary for 

Fish, Wildlife and Parks and the 

Secretary of the Interior, who may revise 

or approve the proposal. The Secretary 

may then forward a wilderness 

recommendation to the President, who 

in turn may approve or revise the 

recommendation and then transmit the 

recommendation to Congress for 

consideration.

Approved: November 23, 2004. 

Ernest Quintana, 

Regional Director.

[FR Doc. 04–28297 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–52–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service 

Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, ME; 

Acadia National Park Advisory 

Commission; Notice of Meeting 

Notice is hereby given in accordance 

with the Federal Advisory Committee 

Act (Public Law 92–463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 

U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 10), that the Acadia 

National Park Advisory Commission 

will hold a meeting on Monday, 

February 7, 2005. 

The Commission was established 

pursuant to Public Law 99–420, Sec. 

103. The purpose of the commission is 

to consult with the Secretary of the 

Interior, or his designee, on matters 

relating to the management and 

development of the park, including but 

not limited to the acquisition of lands 

and interests in lands (including 

conservation easements on islands) and 

termination of rights of use and 

occupancy. 

The meeting will convene at park 

Headquarters, McFarland Hill, Bar 

Harbor, Maine, at 1 p.m. to consider the 

following agenda: 

1. Review and approval of minutes 

from the meeting held September 13, 

2004. 

2. Committee reports:

—Land Conservation. 

—Park Use. 

—Science. 

—Historic.

3. Old business. 

4. Superintendent’s report. 

5. Public comments. 

6. Proposed agenda for next 

Commission meeting, June 6, 2005. 

The meeting is open to the public. 

Interested persons may make oral/

written presentations to the Commission 

or file written statements. Such requests 

should be made to the Superintendent 

at least seven days prior to the meeting. 

Further information concerning this 

meeting may be obtained from the 

Superintendent, Acadia National Park, 

P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, 

tel: (207) 288–3338.

Dated: December 1, 2004. 

Sheridan Steele, 

Superintendent.

[FR Doc. 04–28290 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service 

Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 

Historical Park Advisory Commission; 

Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, 

National Park Service, Chesapeake and 

Ohio Canal National Historical Park 

Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

meeting of the Chesapeake and Ohio 

Canal National Historical Park Advisory 

Commission (the Commission) will be 

held on Friday, January 21, 2005, at 

park headquarters, 1850 Dual Highway, 

Hagerstown, Maryland. The meeting 

will begin at 10 a.m. 

Items on the agenda include planning 

initiatives, construction and 

development projects, and park 

operational issues. 

The meeting will be open to the 

public. Any person may file with the 

Commission a written statement 

concerning the matters to be discussed. 

Persons who wish to file a written 

statement or testify at the meeting or 

who want further information 

concerning the meeting may contact 

Superintendent Kevin Brandt at (301) 

714–2201.

DATES: January 21, 2005, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 1850 Dual Highway, 

Hagerstown, Maryland 21740.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Superintendent Kevin Brandt, (301) 

714–2201.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission was established by Public 

Law 91–664 to meet and consult with 

the Secretary of the Interior on general 

policies and specific matters related to 

the administration and development of 

the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal 

National Historical Park. 

Members of the Commission are: Mrs. 

Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld, Chairman, Mr. 

Charles J. Weir, Mr. Barry A. Passett, 

Mr. Terry W. Hepburn, Ms. JoAnn M. 

Spevacek, Mrs. Mary E. Woodward, 

Mrs. Donna Printz, Mrs. Ferial S. 

Bishop, Ms. Nancy C. Long, Mrs. Jo 

Reynolds, Dr. James H. Gilford, Brother 

James Kirkpatrick.

Dated: November 23, 2004. 

Kevin D. Brandt, 

Superintendent, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal 

National Historical Park.

[FR Doc. 04–28291 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–52–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Advisory Commission 

Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory 

Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice of January 15, 2005, 

meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date 

of the January 15, 2005, meeting of the 

Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

DATES: The public meeting of the 

Advisory Commission will be held on 

Saturday, January 15, 2005, from 1 p.m. 

to 4 p.m. Additionally, the Commission 

will attend the Flight 93 Memorial Task 

Force meeting the same day from 8 a.m. 

to 11 a.m., which is also open to the 

public. 

Location: The Commission meeting 

will be held at the Somerset County 

Courthouse, Courtroom #1; 2nd floor; 

111 East Union Street, Somerset, 

Pennsylvania, 15501. The Flight 93 

Memorial Task Force meeting will be 

held in the same location. 

Agenda 

The January 15, 2005 Commission 

meeting will consist of: 

(1) Opening of meeting and pledge of 

allegiance. 

(2) Review and approval of minutes 

from May 14, 2004. 

(3) Reports from the Flight 93 

Memorial Task Force and the National 

Park Service. Comments from the public 

will be received after each report. 

(4) Old business. 

(5) New business. 

(6) Closing remarks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, 

Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West 

Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501, 

814.443.4557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting will be open to the public. Any 

member of the public may file with the 

Commission a written statement 

concerning agenda items. The statement 

should be addressed to the Flight 93 

77776 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 248 / Tuesday, December 28, 2004 / Notices 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)).

2The Commission further determines that critical 

circumstances do not exist with respect to those 

imports of the subject merchandise from China that 

were subject to the affirmative critical 

circumstances determination by the Department of 

Commerce.

Advisory Commission, 109 West Main 

Street, Somerset, PA 15501.

Dated: November 30, 2004. 

Joanne M. Hanley, 

Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.

[FR Doc. 04–28289 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–WH–M

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigations Nos. 701–TA–437 and 731–

TA–1060 and 1061 (Final)] 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From 

China and India 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(Commission) determines, pursuant to 

sections 705(b) and 735(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b) and 

1673d(b)) (the Act), that an industry in 

the United States is materially injured 

by reason of imports from China and 

India of carbazole violet pigment 23, 

provided for in subheading 3204.17.90 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States, that have been found 

by the Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) to be subsidized by the 

Government of India and to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(LTFV).2

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective November 21, 

2003, following receipt of a petition 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by Nation Ford Chemical 

Co., Fort Mill, SC, and Sun Chemical 

Corp., Cincinnati, OH. The final phase 

of these investigations was scheduled by 

the Commission following notification 

of preliminary determinations by 

Commerce that imports of carbazole 

violet pigment 23 from India were being 

subsidized within the meaning of 

section 703(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1671b(b)) and that imports of carbazole 

violet pigment 23 from China and India 

were being sold at LTFV within the 

meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the 

scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register of July 23, 2004 (69 FR 44059). 

The hearing was held in Washington, 

DC, on November 10, 2004, and all 

persons who requested the opportunity 

were permitted to appear in person or 

by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigations to 

the Secretary of Commerce on December 

22, 2004. The views of the Commission 

are contained in USITC Publication 

3744 (December 2004), entitled 

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China 

and India: Investigations Nos. 701–TA–

437 and 731–TA–1060 and 1061 (Final).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 21, 2004. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04–28340 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–406 

(Consolidated Advisory Opinion and 

Enforcement Proceedings)] 

In the Matter of Certain Lens-Fitted 

Film Packages; Order 

On October 7, 2004, the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

issued two decisions in appeals 

stemming from the above-captioned 

proceedings, VastFame Camera, Ltd., et 

al. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Com’n, 386 F.3d 

1108 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (‘‘VastFame’’) and 

Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., et al. v. U.S. 

Int’l Trade Com’n, 386 F.3d 1095 (Fed. 

Cir. 2004) (‘‘Fuji’’). The mandates issued 

in these cases on November 29, 2004. In 

VastFame, the Court reversed the 

Commission’s decision to refuse to 

allow an importer who had not been a 

respondent in the original investigation 

to raise the defense of patent invalidity 

in the Commission’s enforcement 

proceedings, vacated the enforcement 

decision, and remanded the case for 

proceedings consistent with its Opinion. 

In Fuji, the Court affirmed the majority 

of the Commission’s determinations at 

issue, but vacated and remanded the 

Commission’s infringement decision as 

to one asserted claim for 

redetermination of the infringement 

issue using a claim construction 

supplied by the Court. 

It is hereby ordered that: 

1. This investigation be remanded to 

Administrative Law Judge Paul J. 

Luckern in order that he may conduct 

such further proceedings as may be 

necessary to carry out the mandates of 

the Court and conclude the proceedings. 

2. The presiding administrative law 

judge shall issue an initial 

determination in which he shall 

determine: 

a. Whether claim 15 of U.S. Patent No. 

4,884,087 is invalid; 

b. Whether any of the respondents’

accused disposable cameras imported 

into or sold in the United States infringe 

claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 4,972,649 

under the Federal Circuit’s claim 

construction; and 

c. Whether there are, in light of the 

determinations made in accordance 

with paragraph b. above, any further 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930. 

3. The presiding administrative law 

judge may, in his discretion, reopen the 

evidentiary record to the extent 

necessary to resolve any new factual 

questions presented by the Court’s 

opinion. His ID will be processed by the 

Commission in accordance with 

Commission Rules 210.42(h)(2) and 

210.43–210.45, 19 CFR 210.42(h)(2) and 

210.43–210.45. 

4. In the event that the presiding 

administrative law judge determines 

that there have been additional 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, he shall issue a 

recommended determination on 

whether any further enforcement 

measures are necessary.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 21, 2004. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04–28339 Filed 12–27–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–500] 

In the Matter of Certain Purple 

Protective Gloves; Notice of Issuance 

of General Exclusion Order and 

Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to issue a 

general exclusion order in the abovecaptioned investigation and has 

terminated the investigation.