© USIP 2016 • All rights reserved.

United States Institute of Peace • www.usip.org • Tel. 202.457.1700 • 

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE

@usip

“Engaging victims in the 

design and implementation of the measures and 

providing timely and effective 

remedies to individuals and 

communities are important 

building blocks for peace 

accord implementation.”

July 2016

Virginia M. Bouvier Colombia’s Peace Accord on the Missin

Email: vbouvier@usip.org

Lisa Haugaard

Email: lisah@lawg.org

PEACEBRIEF211

Introduction

As peace talks in Havana between the Colombian government and the FARC-EP enter their final 

stretch, both parties are producing agreements to de-escalate the conflict, build confidence in the 

peace process, and address the legacies of a half-century of internal armed conflict. The accord on 

the missing, signed on October 17, 2015, does all three. 

On April 22, 2016, the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) and the Latin America Working Group 

Education Fund (LAWGEF) convened experts to take stock of the accord and its implementation. 

This meeting,1 part of the USIP Colombia Peace Forum series, featured Ulianov Franco Vanegas, the 

executive director of Familiares Colombia, an association of family members of the missing; Carlos 

Eduardo Valdés Moreno, the general director of the National Institute of Forensic Medicine; Diana 

Arango Gómez, the executive director of the independent forensic team Equitas; and Christoph 

Harnisch, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) delegation in Colombia 

Summary

• A new accord on the missing made between the Colombian government and the Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC-EP) in October 2015 commits the parties to a series 

of confidence-building humanitarian measures and institutional changes to alleviate the 

suffering of the families of those who disappeared in the context of Colombia’s internal 

armed conflict.

• Interactions between family members of the missing, civil society, and the state helped 

shape the accord and have opened opportunities for collaboration in its implementation. 

• Peace negotiators have established immediate measures to locate and identify the 

missing and provide a dignified return of their remains; to that effect, they are setting up 

a new search committee to search proactively for the missing.

• Implementation challenges include a paucity of information, geographic and technical 

barriers to finding and identifying the missing, uncoordinated data management systems 

and weak interinstitutional collaboration, stigmatization of and security threats to those 

searching for the missing, and strained relationships between victims and the state.

• Administrative challenges include the vast number of victims of forced disappearances, the 

lack of follow-up mechanisms between civil society and state officials, and unclear routes 

for receiving state services. 
© USIP 2016 • All rights reserved.

Colombia’s Peace Accord on the Missing

Page 2 • PB 211 • July 2016

(via Skype). Participants were joined by members of the U.S. executive and legislative branches and 

human rights experts. This brief shares insights from these discussions on advances made thus far, 

the role of victims in achieving and implementing the accord, challenges for implementation, and 

recommendations for moving forward. 

The Missing in Colombia

Until recently, forced disappearances remained a hidden problem in Colombia, due in part to the 

nature of the crime and the victims that were targeted. Forced disappearances2 are defined in 

international human rights law as the unacknowledged arrest, detention, or abduction of persons 

by state agents or with state acquiescence. In Colombia, paramilitary militias acting with the acquiescence of the state carried out many of the forced disappearances. Victims of forced disappearances 

include the rural and urban poor, labor and peasant organizers, journalists, human rights defenders, 

politicians, and Afro-Colombian and indigenous leaders. 

But the problem of missing persons in the context of the conflict is broader than that definition. 

People have gone missing at the hands of all the armed groups (paramilitary militias, guerrillas, 

and government security forces). Kidnap victims who died or were killed in captivity, and members 

of the military and guerrillas who fought in the conflict and remain unaccounted for, are not 

considered to be forcibly disappeared, but they are counted among Colombia’s missing and are 

covered by the accord.

No one knows how many people were forcibly disappeared in the context of Colombia’s internal 

armed conflict, but the number is vast and disappearances continue as peace talks proceed. As of 

May 2016, the Colombian government’s victims unit registered more than 45,000 forcibly disappeared persons, with indirect victims at about three times that number. Another database managed by the National Institute for Forensic Medicine puts the total number of missing persons at 

111,588—the earliest in 1938—with more than 22,000 of these classified as forced disappearances.3

Men constitute 88 percent of those forcibly disappeared; the departments where disappearances 

occur most often are Antioquia, Meta, Valle del Cauca, Cesar, Caquetá, and Putumayo. Unidentified 

bodies languish in unmarked graves within cemeteries; in mass graves near illegal armed groups’ 

camps; in town dumps, such as Medellín’s La Escombrera; and in rivers and jungles. 

In the absence of a body, victims’ rights to truth, justice, reparations, and guarantees of 

non-repetition prove difficult to pursue. Prosecution of the perpetrator, even when known, is 

problematic. Without the body, families lack the proper burial or funeral rites that might ease 

their grief and offer closure. In the midst of an ongoing conflict, with the perpetrators still at large, 

efforts to seek information about forced disappearances often provoke stigmatization, threats, and 

violence. Families remain in limbo—torn between their desire to know the truth and their fear of 

what might have happened to their loved ones.4 As Colombian scholar Alfredo Molano has noted, 

disappearance has a profound impact on family members: “To the torment of absence is added the 

sorrow of doubt.” 

Accord #62: New Measures on the Missing

Victims, including family members of the missing, have played an active role in the Colombian 

peace process, and their advocacy is yielding results: On October 17, 2015, the negotiating parties 

in Havana issued a joint communiqué, Accord #62, addressing the plight of Colombia’s missing. 

Accord #62 commits the parties to a series of confidence-building humanitarian measures and 

institutional changes to alleviate the suffering of the families of the missing. 
© USIP 2016 • All rights reserved.

Colombia’s Peace Accord on the Missing

Page 3 • PB 211 • July 2016

Immediate Humanitarian Measures

The parties agreed on immediate measures to accelerate the search for, identification of, and 

dignified return of the remains of missing persons to their families: 

• They called on the ICRC and the National Institute of Forensic Medicine, with the support of 

the attorney general’s office, to consolidate relevant information from the government, the 

FARC-EP, and victims’ organizations. 

• The Colombian government agreed to accelerate the identification of those without name 

—including victims of extrajudicial executions and those who died during security operations and were deposited anonymously in cemeteries—and to turn over their remains to 

family members. 

• The FARC-EP agreed to turn over information to help locate and identify victims. 

• The ICRC will assist as needed in contacting family members of the missing members of the 

FARC-EP. 

The parties also called on the existing search commission (Comisión de Búsqueda de Personas 

Desaparecidas) to produce recommendations for a new commission charged with proactively 

searching for people who went missing during the conflict. The existing commission, established in 

2000, helped document cases of disappearances but, according to family members of the missing, 

failed to produce sufficient results in locating the missing.

A New Search Unit for the Missing 

The parties agreed that a new search unit for the missing (Unidad de Búsqueda de Personas 

Desaparecidas) will be created once a final peace accord is signed. 

The unit will be one component of the Comprehensive System for Truth, Justice, Reparations, 

and Non-Repetition, which also includes a Commission for the Clarification of Truth, Coexistence 

and Non-Repetition and a Special Peace Tribunal. The new search unit will

• contribute to satisfying victims’ rights to truth and reparations by establishing what happened to those who disappeared as a result of actions of “agents of the state, members of 

the FARC-EP, or of any organization that might have participated in the conflict”; 

• undertake humanitarian actions to search for, locate, and identify the victims of disappearances who are alive. Where the individual has died, the unit will turn over the remains to 

family members; and

• serve as a high-level, independent, transitory search unit; include robust participation from 

victims, human rights defenders, and specialized organizations; and issue periodic reports 

to family members of the missing. 

Initial Follow-Up to Accord #62 

As requested, in March 2016, the Havana negotiators received recommendations from the National 

Search Commission. The Working Group on Forced Disappearances (the convening mechanism for 

victims’ associations and groups providing independent forensic and legal expertise and accompaniment) also submitted a report with recommendations for effective implementation of Accord #62.

During the USIP-LAWGEF discussion in April, participants noted that the accord on the missing 

marks an advance in the peace process and is a meaningful step in making the problem of the missing more visible. They found the accord to be “hopeful” and “visionary,” proposing forward-thinking 

solutions. Participants applauded the engagement of victims in shaping the accord on the missing 
© USIP 2016 • All rights reserved.

Colombia’s Peace Accord on the Missing

Page 4 • PB 211 • July 2016

and the opportunities it provides for civil society engagement. Participants welcomed the more 

aggressive approach in searching for and identifying the missing and ensuring the dignified return of 

remains. Since the signing of Accord #62, the Colombian government has, on two occasions, returned 

the remains of forty-four missing victims to their families; this was a positive, albeit limited, step.5 “The 

time has arrived for finding the missing,” noted Ulianov Franco.

Challenges to Implementation

Many challenges remain for the implementation of Accord #62, including the lack of information 

(even on the scope of missing persons) and the lack of a single database or registry of the missing. 

Ongoing threats and stigmatization of those searching for the missing make witnesses and family 

members reluctant to come forward with information. Technical and geographic impediments are 

exacerbated by the passage of time and the resulting disintegration of evidence. Likewise, the lack 

of trained judges, bureaucratic red tape, ambiguous jurisdictional questions, and shifting priorities 

at and around the peace table challenge timely implementation. 

The victims’ accumulated frustrations and lack of trust in the state, due to a history of indifference and neglect, an institutional structure that has failed to produce results, and state complicity 

in forced disappearances will need to be addressed. Family members perceive that bureaucratic 

needs often have priority over the needs of the families of the missing. Concerted efforts by the 

state to ensure greater participation by family members, state protocols that recognize the dignity 

and preferences of the victims’ families, timely compliance with agreements, and strong communication channels can go far to mend this broken relationship. It is likely, however, to be a long, 

sensitive process that will demand patience. 

Recommendations 

• Victims have invaluable information relevant to implementing the accord; thus, their participation will be important throughout. However, the state—not the victims—is obligated 

to, and must, bear the responsibility for advancing the process. 

• A follow-up mechanism between negotiators and government implementers with the 

Working Group on Forced Disappearances should be quickly established to strengthen 

coordination with victims and allow them to provide input regarding implementation, including setting up the search unit and carrying out the immediate humanitarian measures. 

• Government agencies dealing with issues related to the missing should strengthen interinstitutional collaboration and establish a transparent division of labor. The pathways for receiving 

services should be consulted with, and made clear to, family members of the missing.

• Agencies involved in exhumations and returns should coordinate with the families of individual 

victims and their advocates to ensure “dignified returns” that provide the appropriate rituals and 

psychosocial assistance according to individual religious and cultural beliefs and world views. 

• The international community should support, monitor, encourage, and fund the accord’s 

implementation. Support should be directed to civil society organizations, including victims’ 

associations and groups providing forensic, human rights, and psychosocial accompaniment 

and expertise. Without such international support, civil society organizations crucial to Accord 

#62’s success will be less effective. Likewise, support with benchmarks for accountability 

should be directed to Colombian government institutions, including the new search unit.

• The Colombian government should ask the United States and other governments to 

declassify documents that could shed light on forced disappearances in Colombia and to 
© USIP 2016 • All rights reserved.

Colombia’s Peace Accord on the Missing

Page 5 • PB 211 • July 2016

USIP provides the analysis, training, and 

tools that prevent and end conflicts, 

promotes stability, and professionalizes 

the field of peacebuilding.

For media inquiries, contact the office 

of Public Affairs and Communications, 

202.429.4725.

2301 Constitution Ave.

Washington, DC 20037

202.457.1700

2301 Constitution Ave., NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

2301 Constitution Ave.

Washington, DC 20037

202.457.1700

eISBN: 978-1-60127-610-0

contribute to the work of the search unit and the Commission for the Clarification of Truth, 

Coexistence, and Non-Repetition. 

• The attorney general’s office should increase efforts to investigate and prosecute those 

responsible for ongoing threats and attacks against those searching for the missing. 

• It will be important to manage expectations raised by Accord #62 while maintaining 

momentum in the search for the missing.

Conclusion

Creating spaces for dialogue, such as those provided by the USIP-LAWGEF discussion, can help 

build trust between government and civil society. Implementation of this accord is in its early 

stages and, if done well, could generate greater public confidence in the peace process. Engaging 

victims in the design and implementation of the measures and providing timely and effective 

remedies to individuals and communities are important building blocks for peace accord implementation. Assessing the results regularly can allow for mid-course corrections. Formal mechanisms for consultation with relatives of the missing will ensure the effectiveness of the process and 

help repair relationships damaged by the conflict. The search for Colombia’s missing is daunting, 

but Accord #62 offers a route forward. 

Notes

1. A webcast of the discussion can be accessed online at www.usip.org/events/colombia-peaceforum-seeking-truth-the-disappeared.

2. “Enforced disappearance” is defined by the International Convention for the Protection of All 

Persons from Enforced Disappearance as “the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form 

of deprivation of liberty by agents of the state or by persons or groups of persons acting with 

the authorization, support or acquiescence of the state, followed by a refusal to acknowledge 

the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared 

person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.” However, in Colombia, 

victims, as well as government officials responsible for addressing forced disappearance, tend 

to include the cases of people who vanished in the context of the armed conflict, irrespective 

of the perpetrator. 

3. Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses, Dirección General, “Políticas institucionales para la búsqueda, recuperación, identificación y entrega digna de personas desaparecidas” (Bogotá, Colombia: 2016). 

4. See Lisa Haugaard and Kelly Nicholls, Breaking the Silence: In Search of Colombia’s Disappeared

(Washington, DC: Latin America Working Group and U.S. Office on Colombia, 2010), http://

lawg.org/storage/documents/Colombia/BreakingTheSilence.pdf, in Spanish: www.lawg.org/

storage/documents/Colombia/RompiendoElSilencio.pdf.

5. Virginia M. Bouvier, “Accord on Disappeared Shows First Results,” Colombia Calls (blog), December 17, 2015, https://vbouvier.wordpress.com/2016/01/14/accord-on-disappeared-showsfirst-results/; Virginia M. Bouvier, “Parties Resume Talks in Havana; Advances in Trust-Building 

Continue,” Colombia Calls, April 21, 2016.

About This Bri

This brief examines an agreement 

on forced disappearances reached 

in October 2015 between the 

Colombian government and the 

Colombian Revolutionary Armed 

Forces (FARC-EP) in the context of 

peace talks under way in Havana, 

Cuba, and analyzes the implementation challenges ahead. It 

includes insights from an April 22, 

2016, meeting hosted by the U.S. 

Institute of Peace and the Latin 

America Working Group Education 

Fund. Virginia M. Bouvier is the 

senior advisor for Peace Processes 

at the U.S. Institute of Peace. Lisa 

Haugaard is the executive director 

of the Latin America Working 

Group Education Fund.