alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2552

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 213. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005

Mr. LANGEVIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pigment Yellow 213.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 213. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.09.84 Pigment Yellow 213 (CAS 

No. 220198–21–0) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.17.60) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2

•HR 2552 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 1000.64 What are the permissible uses of program income?

Program income may be used for any housing or housing related activity and is not subject to other federal requirements.

[77 FR 71524, Dec. 3, 2012]
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Frank Bakun, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated October 31, 1977, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he had been denied a speedy trial and in the furtherance of justice. Action remanded to the Criminal Term to hear and report on the issues of whether the defendant *1063had been denied his right to a speedy trial and, also, whether the indictment should have been dismissed in the furtherance of justice, and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. The hearing shall be conducted by a Justice other than the one who made the order under review. No hearing was held at Criminal Term on the speedy trial issue, and the present record is woefully insufficient to permit us to review this question on the merits. Insofar as the motion to dismiss the indictment in the furtherance of justice is concerned, the "hearing” which was conducted thereon does not appear to have given the issue the careful consideration which it deserved (cf. *People v Kwok Ming Chan,*45 AD2d 613). Martuscello, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
#### Williams *v.*The State.

November 13, 1912.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Charlton. Chatham superior court. August 30, 1912.

*Twiggs & Gazan,*for plaintiff in error. *T. 8¡ Felder, attorney-general,*and *W. G. Hartridge, solicitor-general,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. “It is not a matter of right for the accused to make a second statement to the court and jury because the State has introduced additional evidence which strengthens the case against him.” *Boston*v. *State,*94 *Ga.*590 (21 S. E. 603); *Knox*v. *State,*112 *Ga.*373 (37 S. E. 416). Whether he should be allowed to supplement his first statement with another is discretionary with the trial court. *Dixon*v. *State,*116 *Ga.*186 (42 S. E. 357). In this case the court did not abuse his discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to make a second statement.

2. Certain illegal testimony was received in evidence over objection. Subsequently it was ruled out and the jury was instructed specifically not ■ to consider it. The character of the evidence was not such as to affect the impartiality of the trial. It was not error to refuse a new trial on the complaint that this circumstance constituted prejudicial error.

3. The alleged newly discovered evidence is simply impeaching in character, and not calculated to produce a different result should a new trial be granted.

4. The evidence is sufficient to uphold the verdict, which has been approved by the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 221.43 Governing law.

This Guarantee shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States of America governing contracts and commercial transactions of the United States Government.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VOLTERRA SEMICONDUCTOR

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v.

 PRIMARION, INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

Case No. C08-05129 JCS

ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER TO

SUBMIT A PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR

THE REMAINDER OF THE CASE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that lead trial counsel for Plaintiff, and lead trial counsel for

Defendants, shall meet and confer, and submit a proposed schedule for the remainder of the case,

which shall also include the dates of any further expert disclosure and discovery. The proposed

schedule shall be filed by no later than Wednesday, March 3, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2010

_________________________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05129-JCS Document 699 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 161

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear at 85 FR 32296, July 13, 2020.

#### § 161.1 Purpose and scope.

These Departmental regulations are designed to supplement the CEQ Regulations and provide for the implementation of those provisions identified in § 1507.3(b) of the CEQ Regulations. The CEQ Regulations are incorporated herein by reference. The Department's regulations seek to assure that environmental considerations and values are incorporated into the Department's decisionmaking process and assign responsibility within the Department for assessing the significant environmental effects in the United States of the Department's actions.
Presidential Documents

76595

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 245

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7856 of December 17, 2004

Wright Brothers Day, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

On Wright Brothers Day, we honor the achievement and imagination of 

Orville and Wilbur Wright, two bicycle mechanics from Dayton, Ohio, who 

changed the world with their optimism, creativity, and persistence. On 

this day, we recall a monumental event in the history of our Nation and 

in the story of mankind. 

On a cold December morning in 1903 on the Outer Banks of North Carolina, 

a small wood and canvas aircraft sent America on a journey far beyond 

the sands of Kitty Hawk. The flight spanned 120 feet and lasted just 12 

seconds, yet it ushered in a new era of unimaginable advances in aviation 

and aerospace technology. Today, air travel is vital to our country, helping 

bring people together and sustain our security. In addition, the aviation 

industry strengthens our economy by supporting millions of jobs. 

The spirit that led the Wright Brothers to powered flight continues today 

in America’s space program. From providing surveys of the sun to images 

of the planets, our spacecraft are exploring the outer edges of our solar 

system and revolutionizing our view of the universe. Under my Vision 

for Space Exploration Program, we will proudly carry on the Wright Brothers’ 

tradition of innovation. As we embark on the next century of flight, that 

spirit of discovery will help our Nation and the world realize the full 

promise of tomorrow. 

The Congress, by a joint resolution approved December 17, 1963 (77 Stat. 

402; 36 U.S.C. 143) as amended, has designated December 17 of each year 

as ‘‘Wright Brothers Day’’ and has authorized and requested the President 

to issue annually a proclamation inviting the people of the United States 

to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim December 17, 2004, as Wright Brothers 

Day. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth 

day of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the 

76596 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 245 / Wednesday, December 22, 2004 / Presidential Documents 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and twentyBilling code 3195

Filed 12

[FR Doc. 04

–21–

–

04; 8:45 am] 

28111

–01–P 

ninth.

W
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment to the Employment Agreement dated as of November 13, 2008 (the “Agreement”)
by and between Rockwood Specialties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”)
and Robert J. Zatta (the “Executive”) is hereby executed as of October 28,
2010.


 


1.               Section 4
of the Agreement is amended, effective as of calendar year 2010, by
substituting “110%” for “100%” in the first sentence thereof.


 


2.               Section 6.3
of the Agreement is amended, effective January 1, 2010, to read as
follows:


 


“6.3         Company Car.  During the employment term, the Executive
will be provided with use of a Company automobile or an automobile allowance
equivalent to the lease payment of an automobile commensurate with the
Executive’s position, including reimbursement on a monthly basis for expenses
associated with operating the automobile including gas, insurance and
maintenance.  The reimbursements called
for by this Section 6.3 (as well as by Sections 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6) shall be
paid in accordance with the Company’s reimbursement policy for senior
executives (but in no event later than the last day of the calendar year next
following the calendar year in which the Executive pays the respective
expenses).  Payment or reimbursement of
such amounts with respect to any calendar year shall not affect the amount
eligible for payment or reimbursement in any other calendar year, and such
payments and reimbursements may not be exchanged for cash or another benefit.”


 


3.               Clause (iv) of
each of Sections 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6 is amended to read as follows:


 


“(iv) provide continued use of Executive’s
Company automobile or a continued automobile allowance for a period of twelve
(12) months (as provided in Section 6.3); and”


 


4.               Except as set
forth above, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
and delivered as of the day and year first above set forth.


 


 


	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Sheldon R. Erikson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:
  Sheldon R. Erikson

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:
    Chairman, Compensation Committee

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/
  Robert J. Zatta

  
	
   

  	
  Robert
  J. Zatta
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDescription of algorithms for processing Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) dataThe algorithms for processing coastal zone color scanner (CZCS) data to geophysical units (pigment concentration) are described. Current public domain information for processing these data is summarized. Calibration, atmospheric correction, and bio-optical algorithms are presented. Three CZCS data processing implementations are compared.Document ID19840014070Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsZion, P. M.*(Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Tech. Pasadena, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateDecember 15, 1983Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberJPL-PUB-83-98NASA-CR-173466NAS 1.26:173466Accession Number84N22138Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS7-100PROJECT: RTOP 161-10-08-01-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840014070.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1









Photon Dynamics Management Incentive Plan



 




Corporate Factor: This factor is based on Corporate Performance against the documented
Business Plan performance objectives. This factor will be determined by the CEO/CFO with Board of
Directors approval. (See attached)*



Business Unit Factor: This factor is determined by the CEO/CFO based on performance against the
documented business plan for the individual Business Unit.



Individual Factor: This factor is determined by the direct manager against agreed upon goals and
objectives tied to the PLAN OF RECORD (the specific goals and
objectives for the employees business unit or functional unit for the
fiscal year).




The 2006 Management Incentive Plan will consist of three factors:





	 	1)	 	The Corporate Factor which is the factor derived from the overriding performance of
Photon Dynamics as a whole. This factor will comprise 70% of the bonus payout weighting.
	 
	 	2)	 	The second factor will be derived form the overall performance of the Business Unit.
This Factor will comprise 30% of the payout weighting. Functional Units will be paid out
at 100% weighting of the Corporate Factor.
	 
	 	3)	 	The third factor will be the Individual MBOs, directly aligned to the Organizational
Plans of Record.





Bonus Calculation Formula:





Business Unit: Corporate
Factor (at 70% weighting) + Business Unit Factor (at 30% weighting)
X Individual Performance Rating



Example 1: Business Unit Case:

Corp Factor = 100%

Business Unit #1 = 50%

Individual = 75%


((100% x 0.7) + (50% X 0.3)) X 75% = 63.75%


Example 2: Business Unit

Corp Factor = 100%

Business Unit #2 = 90%

Individual = 100%


((100% x 0.7) + (90% X 0.3)) X 100% = 97%


Example 3: Max Case

Corp Factor = 150%

Business Unit = 150%

Individual = 100


((150% x 0.7) + (150% X 0.3)) X 100% = 150%


Example 4: Functional Unit

Corporate = 100%

Individual = 97%


100% X 97% = 97%



Attached are the Corporate Targets for the 2006 Bonus Payout.*






 




			
	*
Omitted as specific quantitative or
qualitative performance-related factors, or factors or criteria involving
confidential or business information the disclosure of which would have an
adverse effect on the Registrant.
#### Central State Bank, Respondent, v William Kilroy, Defendant, and Rita M. Ostrer, Appellant.

In an action, commenced by service of a summons and notice of motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, by the cashing bank to recover against the drawer and the endorser of two checks drawn on insufficient funds, the defendant drawer appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 8. 1976, which is in favor of plaintiff-respondent and against her, upon ar. order of the same court which granted the motion for summary judgment as against her. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The codefendant, William Kilroy, allegedly stole and completed two checks which had been signed in blank by appellant and delivered by her to her husband. Kilroy completed the checks and cashed them at the plaintiff Central Savings Bank (Central), where he was a customer. Both checks were dishonored by the drawee bank for insufficient funds. Appellant opposed the motion for summary judgment, claiming that factual questions exist. In support of this claim she alleged that it is her "understanding” that a bank employee was in "cahoots” with Kilroy to authorize the cashing of third-party checks which Kilroy would present to Central. She asserted that this allegation raised a question of fact as to Central’s good faith. It is also claimed that a factual question exists as to Central’s lack of notice of a possible defense in that the first check may or may not have been returned to Central before the second check was cashed. The allegation that a bank employee was acting in concert with Kilroy is not supported by evidentiary facts or materials, or by an affidavit of a person claiming knowledge of such a scheme. C.onclusory allegations in the nature of surmise, conjecture, hope and suspicion are insufficient to raise a triable issue to defeat summary judgment *(Indig v Finkelstein,*23 NY2d 728; see, also, *Bachrach v Farbenfabriken Bayer AG,*42 AD2d 514, affd 36 NY2d 696; *Golding v Weissman,*35 AD2d 941, app dsmd 29 NY2d 913). The second claim also fails to raise any issue of fact. Knowledge by a purchaser of an instrument that there has been a default in the payment of any other instrument, except one of the same series, does not of itself give the purchaser notice of a defense or *941claim. Nor does knowledge that an incomplete instrument has been completed, unless the purchaser has notice of any improper completion, create notice of a defense or claim (Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-304, subd [4]). Therefore, as a matter of law, Central enjoys the status of a holder in due course as to the checks (see Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-302). As such, it .is entitled to enforce the checks as they were completed (see Uniform Commercial Code, §§ 3-407, 3-115). Accordingly, as no triable issues of fact are present, summary judgment was properly granted. Cohalan, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Titone, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2506 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2506

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2,2-
       Dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-, 3-phenoxybenzyl ester, (+-)-
                             ,(cis,trans)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

 Mr. McCrery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2,2-
       Dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-, 3-phenoxybenzyl ester, (+-)-
                             ,(cis,trans)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLIC ACID, 3-(2,2-DICHLOROVINYL)-2,2-
              DIMETHYL-, 3-PHENOXYBENZYL ESTER, (+-)-,(CIS,TRANS)-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.08.16       Cyclopropanecarbo  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         xylic acid, 3-                                                     31/2008
                         (2,2-
                         Dichlorovinyl)-2,
                         2-dimethyl-, 3-
                         phenoxybenzyl
                         ester, (+-)-
                         ,(cis,trans)-
                         (CAS No. 52645-53-
                         1) (provided in
                         subheading
                         2916.20.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

§ 40.24 Prostitution and commercialized vice. ( a ) *Activities within 10 years preceding visa application.* An alien shall be ineligible under INA 212(a)(2)(D) only if— ( 1 ) The alien is coming to the United States solely, principally, or incidentally to engage in prostitution, or has engaged in prostitution, or the alien directly or indirectly procures or attempts to procure, or procured or attempted to procure or to import prostitutes or persons for the purposes of prostitution, or receives or received, in whole or in part, the proceeds of prostitution; and
( 2 ) The alien has performed one of the activities listed in § 40.24(a)(1) within the last ten years.
( b ) *Prostitution defined.* The term “prostitution” means engaging in promiscuous sexual intercourse for hire. A finding that an alien has “engaged” in prostitution must be based on elements of continuity and regularity, indicating a pattern of behavior or deliberate course of conduct entered into primarily for financial gain or for other considerations of material value as distinguished from the commission of casual or isolated acts.
( c ) *Where prostitution not illegal.* An alien who is within one or more of the classes described in INA 212(a)(2)(D) is ineligible to receive a visa under that section even if the acts engaged in are not prohibited under the laws of the foreign country where the acts occurred.
( d ) *Waiver of ineligibility—INA 212(h).* If an immigrant visa applicant is ineligible under INA 212(a)(2)(D) but is qualified to seek the benefits of INA 212(h), the consular officer shall inform the alien of the procedure for applying to DHS for relief under that provision of law. A visa may not be issued to the alien until the consular officer has received notification from DHS of the approval of the alien's application under INA 212(h).
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued015646F
Universe Freight Brokers, Inc., 3625 NW., 82nd Avenue, Suite 401, Miami, FL 33126
September 20, 2004.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 04-28020 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P