alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

110540.1 1

REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE 

LAW OFFICES 

MESERVE, 

MUMPER & 

HUGHES LLP 

Linda M. Lawson (Bar No. 77130) 

LLawson@mmhllp.com 

Sasha Lankarani (Bar No. 234188) 

slankarani@mmhllp.com 

MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP 

300 South Grand Avenue, 24th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90071-3185 

Telephone: (213) 620-0300 

Facsimile: (213) 625-1930 

C. Mark Humbert (Bar No. 111093) 

markh@lifehealthlaw.com 

GREEN & HUMBERT 

The Mills Building 

220 Montgomery Street, Suite 1418 

San Francisco, California 94104 

Telephone: (415) 837-5433 

Facsimile: (415) 837-0127 

Attorneys for Defendants 

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

AMERICA and UNUM GROUP 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

STEPHEN D. BUCK D.D.S., 

Plaintiff,

vs.

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF AMERICA; UNUM 

GROUP; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, 

INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C-08-5166 MMC 

REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 

WITH PREJUDICE 

[F.R.C.P. 41(a)] 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, Case No. C-08-5166 MMC, is 

dismissed in its entirety as to all defendants, with prejudice; and

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:08-cv-05166-MMC Document 37 Filed 05/03/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

110540.1 2

REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 

PREJUDICE 

LAW OFFICES 

MESERVE, 

MUMPER & 

HUGHES LLP 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs in this matter. 

Dated: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney 

Judge, United States District Court 

May 3, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-05166-MMC Document 37 Filed 05/03/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 96.3 [Reserved]
[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

CR 09-0033 WHA 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JEFFREY DAVID SCHINKEL, 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CR 09-0033 WHA

[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF 

FORFEITURE

Having considered the application for a preliminary order of forfeiture filed by the United States 

and the plea agreement entered on June 23, 2009, wherein the defendant admitted to the forfeiture 

allegation, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following property is forfeited to the United States:

a. (1) one White Apple Mac Laptop, Serial No. W872479HTA3,

pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(a)(1) and (a)(3). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States, through its appropriate agency, shall seize 

the forfeited property forthwith and publish on www.forfeiture.gov, a government website for at least 

thirty days, notice of this Order, notice of the government’s intent to dispose of the property in such 

manner as the Attorney General may direct and provide notice that any person, other than the defendant, 

Case 3:09-cr-00033-WHA Document 66 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 2
[PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

CR 09-0033 WHA 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

having or claiming a legal interest in the property, must file a petition with the Court and serve a copy 

on government counsel with (30) days of the final publication of notice or of receipt of actual notice, 

whichever is earlier;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the government may conduct discovery in order to identify, 

locate or dispose of property subject to forfeiture in accordance with Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal 

Rules of Criminal Procedure; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the Preliminary 

Order of Forfeiture, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 

32.2(e); and 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Criminal Rules of 

Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at the time of 

sentencing and shall be made part of the sentence and included in the judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this day of 2015. 

 

 __________________________ 

 WILLIAM ALSUP

 United States District Judge

6 July

Case 3:09-cr-00033-WHA Document 66 Filed 07/06/15 Page 2 of 2
AFS

- 16

- 106475

- E

December 30, 2016

Exemption No. 10682 B Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 1277

Mr. Christopher R. Meinhardt

Director of Maintenance Air Methods Corporation

7301 South Peoria St. Englewood, CO 80112

Dear Mr. Meinhardt :

This letter is to inform you that we have g ranted your petition to extend Exemption No.

10682

, as amended

. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the

conditions and limi tations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 7, 2016

, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Ad ministration (FAA ) on behalf of Air Methods Corp

. (Air Methods ) for an extension of Exemption No. 10682 , as amended . That exemption

, from § § 91.4 11(b) and 91.413 ( c ) of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

, allows Air Methods to perform Air Traffic C ontrol (ATC) transponder tests and inspections and altimeter system

, and altimeter reporting equipment tests

, and inspections for its part 1 35 aircraft maintained under a n Approved Aircraft Inspection Program (AAIP)

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exe mption.AFS

- 16

- 106475

- E

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detriment al to A ir Methods

.

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10 682

, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106( f), 40113

, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegat ed to me, I grant Air Methods Corp. an exemption from 14

CFR §§ 91.411(b) and 91.413(c) to perform ATC transponder tests and inspections and altimeter system , and altimeter reporting equipment te sts

, and inspections for its part 1 35

aircraft maintained under an AAIP

. This exemption extension is subject to the following

conditions and limitations below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. All ATC transponder tests and inspections

, and all altimeters r eporting equipment tests and inspections

, must be conducted under Air Methods Corp

. ’s part 135

AAIP.

2. All tests and inspections must be recorded in the aircraft’s maintenance log by the person performing each inspection and test. This entry must identi fy the person, the date, and this exemption number.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10682 , as amended, to December
30, 2018

, unless so oner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John Barbagallo

D eputy Director, Flight Standards Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000             APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                         202,181                 911,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,644,996               1,262,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (99,415)                (57,845)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,178,285               5,156,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,741,752              10,894,334
<PP&E>                                       8,719,548               7,351,779
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,261,004)             (4,102,254)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,265,074              22,203,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,073,338              10,775,867
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        52,397                  52,397
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,651,572               7,623,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,265,074              22,203,738
<SALES>                                     13,963,300              13,266,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,963,300              13,266,668
<CGS>                                        4,867,849               4,560,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,867,849               4,560,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,948,060               7,666,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             214,580                 195,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (67,189)                 844,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,560)                 347,169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,629)                 497,168
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,629)                 497,168
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)                    0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                    0.11


</TABLE>
~ Dow AgroSciences 

Dow AgroSciences LLC 

9330 Zionsville Road Indianapolis, IN 46268 USA 

March 15, 20 16 

Document Processing Desk 

Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P) 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

One Potomac Yard 

2777 S. Crystal Drive 

Arlington. VA 22202 

Attn: Dana Fliedman (7505P) 

Al: CHLORPYRIFOS 

CHEMICAL CODE: 05910 1 

SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL 

Dear Dana: 

www.dowagro.com 

Dow AgroSciences grants permission for the EPA to make public the report entitled. "A Monitoring Study to Characterize 

Chlorpyrifos Concentration Patterns and Ecological Risk in an Agriculturally Dominated Tributary of the San Joaquin 

River" with MRID # 447 11 601 . This cited report can be publically released without the Affirmation of Non-Multinational 

Status form (per section FIFRA 1 O(g)) as related to its use for the EPA Scientific Advisory Pane l meeting April, 2016. 

If you require additional information. please contact Joyce Carroll. my Registration Assistant for this product. at phone 

(3 17) 337-463 1. 

Respectfully, 

~ George Oliver, Ph.D. 

U.S. Regulatory Leader- Regulatory Affairs 

Office: 3 17-337-4923 

Fax: 3 17-337-4649 

e:rolivcr@dow.com 

®"' Trademnrk of The Dow Chemical Company ( .. Dow .. ) or an affiliated company of Dow
#### § 906.3 Notification.

When the Board orders a hearing, the executive secretary shall so notify the parties in writing. The parties shall be given reasonable notice of the date and place selected by the Board for the hearing.
### §5178. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–390, title II, §206(c), Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1571

Section, Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §411, as added Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §106(g), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4704, related to individual and family grant programs.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5178, Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §408, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 156, related to individual and family grant programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–707, §106(g).

A prior section 411 of Pub. L. 93–288 was renumbered section 414 by Pub. L. 100–707 and is classified to section 5181 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 18 months after Oct. 30, 2000, see section 206(d) of Pub. L. 106–390, set out as an Effective Date of 2000 Amendment note under section 5174 of this title.
### §5183. Crisis counseling assistance and training

#### (a) In general

The President is authorized to provide professional counseling services, including financial assistance to State or local agencies or private mental health organizations to provide such services or training of disaster workers, to victims of major disasters in order to relieve mental health problems caused or aggravated by such major disaster or its aftermath.

#### (b) Training

Each State, local agency, or private mental health organization providing professional counseling services described in subsection (a) shall ensure that, any individual providing professional counseling services to victims of a major disaster as authorized under subsection (a), including individuals working for nonprofit partners and recovery organizations, is appropriately trained to address impacts from major disasters in communities, and to individuals, with socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §416, formerly §413, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 157; renumbered §416 and amended Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §106(i), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4705; Pub. L. 117–251, §7(a), Dec. 20, 2022, 136 Stat. 2357.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 416 of Pub. L. 93–288 was renumbered section 419 by Pub. L. 100–707 and is classified to section 5186 of this title.

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–251 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1988—Pub. L. 100–707 struck out "(through the National Institute of Mental Health)" after "authorized".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2022 Amendment

Pub. L. 117–251, §7(b), Dec. 20, 2022, 136 Stat. 2357, provided that: "The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to amounts appropriated on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 20, 2022]."
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 77250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces meetings of scientific peer 
review groups. The subcommittees listed below are part of the Agency's 
Health Services Research Initial Review Group Committee.
    The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. These discussions are 
likely to involve information concerning individuals associated with 
the applications, including assessments of their personal 
qualifications to conduct their proposed projects. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.
    1. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Research Training.
    Date: January 27-28, 2005 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on January 
27 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    2. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Technology and Decision 
Sciences.
    Date: February 17-18, 2005 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on 
February 17 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    3. Name of Subcommittee: Health Research Dissemination and 
Implemention.
    Date: February 24-25, 2005 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on 
February 24 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    4. Name of Subcommittee: Health Systems Research.
    Date: February 24-25, 2005 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on 
February 24 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    5. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Quality and Effectiveness 
Research.
    Date: February 24-25, 2005 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on 
February 24 and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    All the meetings above will take place at: Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality, John Eisenberg Conference Center, 540 Gaither 
Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of the meetings 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 2000, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554. Agenda items for these meetings are subject 
to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: December 20, 2004.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 04-28187 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4100-90-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

 

In connection with theaccompanying Amendment to Quarterly Report of Bionova Holding Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”), I,Arthur H. Finnel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: January 19, 2004 |                                               |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                               |
|                    |     /S/  ARTHUR H. FINNEL |   |
|                    |                                               | Arthur H. Finnel |   |
|                    |                                               | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
§ 71.11 Short-term full diet program. ( a ) *Eligibility criteria.* A prisoner is considered eligible for the short-term full diet program under the following general criteria: ( 1 ) The prisoner is to be or has been held in excess of one day in a holding jail or other facility;
( 2 ) Incarcerating officials do not provide the prisoner food, and food is not available from any other sources, including private funding from family or friends; and
( 3 ) If the funds exceed an amount to be established by the Department, the prisoner signs a promissory note for funds expended, since the assistance is on a normally reimbursable basis.
( b ) *Consular responsibility.* As soon as the consular officer is aware that a U.S. national is incarcerated in a facility wherein food is not routinely provided, the consular officer should: ( 1 ) Contact the prisoner in accordance with existing procedures;
( 2 ) Determine the normal cost of basic diet and best method of effecting payment;
( 3 ) Attempt to secure funds from private sources such as family or friends;
( 4 ) Because funds expended by the Department to cover the short-term full diet program normally are on a reimbursable basis, have the prisoner execute a promissory note; and
( 5 ) Contact the Department, providing the above information, for approval and authorization.
( c ) *Emergency expenditure authorization.* Since an immediate need for a short-term full diet program often prohibits the delay inherent in contacting the Department and receiving authority to expend funds, the consular officer can expend up to an amount to be established by the Department without prior Departmental approval if the prisoner's case meets the criteria established in paragraph (a) of this section. Expenditures above the predetermined limit must receive the prior approval of the Department.
### §4602. Effect upon property acquisition

(a) The provisions of section 4651 of this title create no rights or liabilities and shall not affect the validity of any property acquisitions by purchase or condemnation.

(b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as creating in any condemnation proceedings brought under the power of eminent domain, any element of value or of damage not in existence immediately prior to January 2, 1971.

(Pub. L. 91–646, title I, §102, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1895.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–646, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1894, known as the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4601 of this title and Tables.
§ 3.2 Authority. ( a ) Section 515(a)(1) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1978 (91 Stat. 862-866), approved August 17, 1977, (hereafter referred to as “the Act”) amended section 7342 of title 5, U.S. Code (1976), making substantial changes in the law relating to the acceptance and retention of gifts and decorations from foreign governments.
( b ) 5 U.S.C. 7342(g) authorizes each employing agency to prescribe regulations as necessary to carry out the new law.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60733

 

LAURA L CARLOCK, Individually and as 

Administrator of the Estate of 

Jane M. Love, Deceased; 

HOMER H LOVE; LINDA PHIPPS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

WILMER D. WILSON; ET AL,

Defendants,

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

OF PITTSBURGH, PA,

Garnishee-Appellee

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

(5:93-CV-128-BrN)

 

August 8, 1997

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See Local Rule 47.6.