1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

L AW OFF IC ES OF

PAUL L. REIN

200 L AKESID E DR., SU ITE A

OAKLAND, CA 94612-3503

(510) 832-5001

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION 

AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CASE NO. 08-01485 MHP -1- S:\C A SES\A \A LA CTY - JO N ES\PLEA D IN GS\M otion for Reconsideration\reconsideration proposed order.w pd

PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053)

CELIA MCGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420)

CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198)

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN

200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A

Oakland, CA 94612

Telephone: 510/832-5001

Facsimile: 510/832-4787

reinlawoffice@aol.com

BRIAN GEARINGER, Esq. (SBN 146125)

GEARINGER LAW GROUP

825 Van Ness Ave., 4 Floor

th

San Francisco, CA 94109-7891

Telephone: 415/440-3175

Facsimile: 415/440-3103

brian@gearingerlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

SHAWNA WILKINS-JONES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWNA WILKINS-JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, and

DOES 1-10, Inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

CASE NO. C08-01485-MHP

Civil Rights

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION AND

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

On May 28, 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order re:

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Having

considered Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration

under Local Rule 7-9, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s Application is

GRANTED.

Having considered plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED. The Court has jurisdiction

over plaintiff’s state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 because they derive from

DENYING DENIED.

Case 3:08-cv-01485-EMC Document 105 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

L AW OFF IC ES OF

PAUL L. REIN

200 L AKESID E DR., SU ITE A

OAKLAND, CA 94612-3503

(510) 832-5001

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION 

AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CASE NO. 08-01485 MHP -2- S:\C A SES\A \A LA CTY - JO N ES\PLEA D IN GS\M otion for Reconsideration\reconsideration proposed order.w pd

a common nucleus of operative fact with plaintiff’s federal claim for damages

under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehab Act of 1973, such that

the entire action before the court comprises one constitutional case. See Mine

Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 725 (1966). Therefore plaintiff’s claims for

state law injunctive relief and for attorney fees under California Civil Code

section 1021.5 are reinstated. 

Moreover, in the interests of justice plaintiff is granted leave to amend her

Complaint to allege facts which would overcome the factual infirmities which led

the Court to dismiss her federal claim for injunctive relief under Article III of the

United States Constitution. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: ______________, 2010 

Hon. MARILYN H. PATEL

United States District Judge

7/6

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

July 14

Case 3:08-cv-01485-EMC Document 105 Filed 07/15/10 Page 2 of 2