alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2603

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cypermethrin Technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on Cypermethrin Technical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) CALENDAR YEAR 2006.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 

6 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

7 States is amended by inserting in numerical se8 quence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.90.15 A-cyano-(3-

phenoxyphenyl)methyl-cis, 

trans-3-(2,2-

dichloroethenyl)–2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (Cypermethrin Technical) (CAS No. 52315–07–

8) (provided for in subheading 2926.90.30) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2006 ’’. 
2

•HR 2603 IH 

1 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made 

2 by paragraph (1) applies to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

5 (b) CALENDAR YEAR 2007.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.90.15 of the 

7 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as 

8 added by subsection (a), is amended—

9 (A) by striking ‘‘Free’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘0.14%’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘On or before 12/31/2006’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2007’’. 

13 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

14 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on January 1, 

15 2007. 

16 (c) CALENDAR YEAR 2008.—

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.90.15 of the 

18 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, as 

19 added by subsection (a) and amended by this sec20 tion, is further amended—

21 (A) by striking ‘‘0.14%’’ and inserting 

22 ‘‘0.38%’’; and 

23 (B) by striking ‘‘On or before 12/31/2007’’ 

24 and inserting ‘‘On or before 12/31/2008’’. 
3

•HR 2603 IH 

1 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

2 by paragraph (1) shall take effect on January 1, 

3 2008.

Æ
Proposed Order on Ex-parte Application 

Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. 

(Case No. 08-04196 BZ)

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB#159747 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB#236458 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL

925 West Hedding Street 

San José, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DANIELLE POLLAR, SHALAWN POLLAR 

as Guardian Ad Litem for J.A., a minor 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

(San Francisco Division) 

DANIELLE POLLAR, SHALAWN ) Case No. 08-04196 BZ 

POLLAR as Guardian Ad Litem for J.A., ) 

a minor, ) [Proposed] 

 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER OF THE COURT ON 

 ) EX-PARTE APPLICATION 

vs. ) ORDER GRANTING INCREASED 

 ) PAGE LIMIT FOR PLAINTIFFS’ 

 ) OPPOSITION TO CITY 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

 ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Defendants. ) 

 ) 

_____ ) 

Plaintiffs’ Ex-parte Application for Order Granting Increased Page Limit for Plaintiffs’ 

Opposition to City Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, was submitted February 8, 

2010 by e-file and chambers submission by e-mail through the ECF system. 

Upon review of the Application, the Declaration of Counsel [In Support], and the 

review of any opposition pleadings submitted, if any, the court hereby finds and orders as 

// 

Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 82 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
Proposed Order on Ex-parte Application 

Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. 

(Case No. 08-04196 BZ)

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

follows: 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, 

1. Plaintiffs may file a brief up to 28 pages in Opposition to the City Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment which is filed and currently pending. 

2. City Defendants may file a Reply brief up to 3 pages longer than the default limit as 

provided for by the Local Rules. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: 2/____/2010 _________________________ 

 JUDGE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN 

U.S.D.C. NORTHERN DISTRICT 

CALIFORNIA – San Francisco 

8

Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 82 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Anief G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 457]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about August 18, 2006, which, after a violation of probation hearing, revoked appellant’s probation and placed him in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of up to 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly determined that the least restrictive alternative for appellant was placement *(see Matter of Yohannes A.,*243 AD2d 316 [1997]). This was appellant’s second violation of probation, and in each instance he had violated substantially all of the conditions of his probation, including his obligations to refrain from using drugs, to attend substance abuse counseling, and to perform community service. Appellant also had serious truancy problems. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Kavanagh, JJ.
### §4811. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588

Section, Pub. L. 91–695, title II, §201, Jan. 13, 1971, 84 Stat. 2078; Pub. L. 93–151, §2, Nov. 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 565, related to the development of local programs for the elimination of lead-based paint poisoning.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588, provided that the repeal of this section is effective Oct. 1, 1979.
§ 51.62 Revocation or limitation of passports and cancellation of Consular Reports of Birth Abroad. ( a ) The Department may revoke or limit a passport when: ( 1 ) The bearer of the passport may be denied a passport under 22 CFR 51.60 or 51.61 or any other applicable provision contained in this part;
( 2 ) The passport was illegally, fraudulently or erroneously obtained from the Department; or was created through illegality or fraud practiced upon the Department; or
( 3 ) The passport has been fraudulently altered or misused.
( b ) The Department may revoke a passport when the Department has determined that the bearer of the passport is not a U.S. national, or the Department is on notice that the bearer's certificate of citizenship or certificate of naturalization has been cancelled.
( c ) The Department may cancel a Consular Report of Birth Abroad when: ( 1 ) The Consular Report of Birth Abroad was illegally, fraudulently or erroneously obtained from the Department, or was created through illegality or fraud practiced upon the Department;
( 2 ) The Consular Report of Birth Abroad has been fraudulently altered or misused; or
( 3 ) The Department has determined that the bearer of the Consular Report of Birth Abroad is not a U.S. national, or the Department is on notice that the bearer's certificate of citizenship has been cancelled.
( d ) The Department shall revoke a U.S. passport in any case in which the Department is notified by the Attorney General, that during the covered period as defined by 22 U.S.C. 212a: ( 1 ) The applicant was convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2423, and
( 2 ) The individual used a passport or otherwise crossed an international border in committing the underlying offense.
( 3 ) Notwithstanding paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section, the Department may issue a limited validity passport for direct return to the United States.
[83 FR 21874, May 11, 2018]
### §3030g–23. Nutrition services impact study

#### (a) Study

#### (1) In general

The Assistant Secretary shall perform a study to assess how to measure and evaluate the discrepancy between available services and the demand for such services in the home delivered nutrition services program and the congregate nutrition services program under this part, which shall include assessing various methods (such as those that States use) to measure and evaluate the discrepancy (such as measurement through the length of waitlists).

#### (2) Contents

In performing the study, the Assistant Secretary shall—

(A) consider means of obtaining information in rural and underserved communities; and

(B) consider using existing tools (existing as of the date the Assistant Secretary begins the study) such as the tools developed through the Performance Outcome Measurement Project.

#### (3) Analysis

The Assistant Secretary shall analyze and determine which methods are the least burdensome and most effective for measuring and evaluating the discrepancy described in paragraph (1).

#### (b) Recommendations

#### (1) Preparation

Not later than 3 years after March 25, 2020, the Assistant Secretary shall prepare recommendations—

(A) on how to measure and evaluate, with the least burden and the most effectiveness, the discrepancy described in subsection (a)(1) (such as measurement through the length of waitlists); and

(B) about whether studies similar to the study described in subsection (a) should be carried out for programs carried out under this chapter, other than this part.

#### (2) Issuance

The Assistant Secretary shall issue the recommendations, and make the recommendations available as a notification pursuant to section 3012(a)(34) of this title and to the committees of the Senate and of the House of Representatives with jurisdiction over this chapter, and the Special Committee on Aging of the Senate.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title III, §339B, as added Pub. L. 116–131, title II, §216, Mar. 25, 2020, 134 Stat. 259.)
#### BOSTWICK, Respondent, v. AVERY, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by Mary A. Bostwick against Rachel Foster Avery, impleaded with William I. Burke and Emily M. Dunton. No opinion. Judgment affirmed by default, with costs, /
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4420 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4420

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic filament tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 19, 2012

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic filament tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FILAMENT TOW.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.40.21 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain acrylic filament 
tow) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1.2%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2012'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Mount Vernon United Methodist Church v. Harris County,

Texas et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 1114

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 1 4

- 2970 8

Trial court: 152nd District Court o f Harris County

A ppell ee s
, Harris County, Harris County Department of Education, Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Harris County Flood Control District, Harris County Hospital District, City of Houston, Houston Independent School District and Houston Community College Sys tem

, ha ve filed a “Notice of Withdrawal” of their Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction, filed on December 20, 2018, and

Second Motion to Dismiss A ppeal

, filed on February 13 , 201 9

. We grant a ppell ees’

request to withdraw the motions and dismis s as moot appellees’ Motion to Dismiss, filed on December 20, 2018, and Second Motion to Dismiss, filed on February 13, 2019

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

__ February 21, 2019

____
#### In re: Dejuan Anderko WATKINS, Petitioner.

No. 07-6217.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 2007.

Decided: April 30, 2007.

Dejuan Anderko Watkins, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dejuan Anderko Watkins petitions for a writ of mandamus claiming there was undue delay by the district court in disposing of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The Government filed a response noting that the district court entered a judgment and order denying the § 2255 motion. In light of the court’s action, we deny as moot Watkins’ petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### § 229.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
### §3535a. Working capital fund

There is hereby established in the United States Treasury, pursuant to section 3535(f) of this title, a working capital fund for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (referred to in this paragraph as the "Fund"): Provided, That amounts transferred to the Fund under this heading shall be available for Federal shared services used by offices and agencies of the Department, and for such portion of any office or agency's printing, records management, space renovation, furniture, or supply services as the Secretary determines shall be derived from centralized sources made available by the Department to all offices and agencies and funded through the Fund: Provided further, That of the amounts made available in this title 1 for salaries and expenses under the headings "Executive Offices", "Administrative Support Offices", "Program Office Salaries and Expenses", and "Government National Mortgage Association", the Secretary shall transfer to the Fund such amounts, to remain available until expended, as are necessary to fund services, specified in the first proviso, for which the appropriation would otherwise have been available, and may transfer not to exceed an additional $10,000,000, in aggregate, from all such appropriations, to be merged with the Fund and to remain available until expended for use for any office or agency: Provided further, That amounts in the Fund shall be the only amounts available to each office or agency of the Department for the services, or portion of services, specified in the first proviso: Provided further, That with respect to the Fund, the authorities and conditions under this heading shall supplant the authorities and conditions provided under section 3535(f) of this title.

(Pub. L. 114–113, div. L, title II, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2868.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This heading, referred to in text, refers to the heading "working capital fund" of title II of div. L of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. 114–113, which is classified to this section.

The amounts made available in this title for salaries and expenses under the headings "Executive Offices", "Administrative Support Offices", "Program Office Salaries and Expenses", and "Government National Mortgage Association", referred to in text, refer to the amounts made available under those headings in title II of div. L of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Pub. L. 114–113, which are not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, and not as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
TS-ASLT40/50 

Attachment #8

Pt. 2, Sec. B, End 

Worker/Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release Information on the 

New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4387 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4387

   To allow for a reasonable compliance deadline for certain States 
             subject to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2012

  Mr. Pompeo (for himself, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Yoder, and Mr. Huelskamp) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow for a reasonable compliance deadline for certain States 
             subject to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING.

    Congress finds that an approximate 180-day period before which 
States and utilities are required to comply with certain new rules 
regarding maximum permissible emissions of ozone, sulfur dioxide, or 
nitrogen oxides under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule is 
insufficient for those States and utilities to achieve that compliance.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Administrator.--The term ``Administrator'' means the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
            (2) Clean air interstate rule.--The term ``Clean Air 
        Interstate Rule'' means the final rule promulgated by the 
        Administrator entitled ``Rule To Reduce Interstate Transport of 
        Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule); 
        Revisions to Acid Rain Program; Revisions to the NOX SIP Call'' 
        (70 Fed. Reg. 25162 (May 12, 2005)).
            (3) Cross-state air pollution rule.--The term ``Cross-State 
        Air Pollution Rule'' means the final rule promulgated by the 
        Administrator entitled ``Federal Implementation Plans: 
        Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and 
        Correction of SIP Approvals'' (76 Fed. Reg. 48208 (August 8, 
        2011)) and revisions to that final rule entitled ``Revisions to 
        Federal Implementation Plans To Reduce Interstate Transport of 
        Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone'' (77 Fed. Reg. 10324 
        (February 21, 2012)).

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF COMPLIANCE DEADLINE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a State that was not 
required to reduce emissions or levels of ozone, sulfur dioxide, or 
nitrogen oxides under the Clean Air Interstate Rule shall not be 
required to comply with any requirement under the Cross-State Air 
Pollution Rule before January 1, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
§ 229.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; *Provided,* that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 229.450.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

ORDER SETTING HEARING

RE DEFENDANT’S

DISCOVERY DISPUTE

A further meet-and-confer is SET for THURSDAY, JANUARY 7, 2010, FROM

8:00–10:00 A.M., in connection with defendant’s discovery dispute outlined in counsel’s

letter of January 4. This will take place in the Court’s jury room on the 19th floor. At 10:00 a.m.,

the Court will hold a hearing in Courtroom 9. Plaintiff’s response is due by noon on January 6. 

Counsel are reminded that only those who participate in the further meet-and-confer may

argue at the hearing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01733-WHA Document 37 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 50.10 Certificate of nationality. ( a ) Any person who acquired the nationality of the United States at birth and who is involved in any judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state and needs to establish his U.S. nationality may apply for a certificate of nationality in the form prescribed by the Department.
( b ) An applicant for a certificate of nationality must submit evidence of his nationality and documentary evidence establishing that he is involved in judicial or administrative proceedings in which proof of his U.S. nationality is required.