alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(i)



Certification



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF TICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tice
Technology, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as amended and restated and as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles R. West, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|Date: October 24, 2003 |  | 
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4399 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4399

To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to reduce the rates 
 of pay of Members of Congress by 5 percent and eliminate future cost-
              of-living adjustments in such rates of pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2012

  Mr. Yoder introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 to reduce the rates 
 of pay of Members of Congress by 5 percent and eliminate future cost-
              of-living adjustments in such rates of pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Salary Reduction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN RATES OF PAY AND ELIMINATION OF FUTURE COST-OF-
              LIVING ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

    Section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 
U.S.C. 31) is amended by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
    ``(2) Effective with respect to pay periods beginning after the 
date of the regularly scheduled general election for Federal office 
held in November 2012, the annual rate of pay for each of the positions 
described in paragraph (1) shall be equal to 95 percent of the annual 
rate of pay for such position for the most recent pay period preceding 
such election.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1701.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 1701.150, no qualified individual with handicaps shall, because the agency's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with handicaps, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the agency.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             936
<SECURITIES>                                    17,955
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,855
<INVENTORY>                                      1,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,050
<PP&E>                                           4,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,564
<SALES>                                         15,471
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,020
<CGS>                                            4,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,096
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (161)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,468)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (808)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,660)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,660)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2564 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2564

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
            qualified tuition deduction at the 2005 levels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

 Mr. English of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Ford) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
            qualified tuition deduction at the 2005 levels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED EXPENSES MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) Repeal of Termination.--Section 222 of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Subparagraph (B) of section 222(b)(2) 
of such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2004 or 2005'' and inserting ``2004 or 
        thereafter'', and
            (2) in the heading by striking ``and 2005'' and inserting 
        ``and thereafter''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4419 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic filament tow. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic filament 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FILAMENT TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4419 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic filament tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) containing by weight 92 percent or more of 

polyacrylonitrile, not more 

than 0.01 percent of zinc, 

and 2 percent or more but 

not over 8 percent of 

water, importing in the 

form of bundles of crimped 

product 198,000 filaments 

(plus or minus 10 percent) 

with an average decitex of 

4.0 to 5.6 decitex (plus or 

minus 10 percent) and 

length greater than 2 meters (provided for in subheading 5501.30.00) ......... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2015 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41484

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:16-CR-385-1

Before SMITH, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto MartinezRamirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Ramirez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41484 Document: 00514040457 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017
No. 16-41484

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-41484 Document: 00514040457 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017
#### John F. Devine, administrator of the estate of John A. Benson, deceased, appellee, v. C. A. Carlson, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,076.

Action for damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate while in the employ of defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar Hebei, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1921.

Affirmed.

Taylor, J., dissenting.

Opinion filed October 18, 1922.

Rehearing denied November 2, 1922.

Hall & Spitz, for appellant; Ross C. Hall, of counsel. Haight, Adcock, Haight & Harris, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
### §3797q. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797q was editorially reclassified as section 10581 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, which was repealed by Pub. L. 115–391, title V, §504(g)(2), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5234.

#### Prior Provisions

Prior sections 3797q–1 to 3797q–6 were repealed by Pub. L. 114–255, div. B, title XIV, §14013, Dec. 13, 2016, 130 Stat. 1298.

Section 3797q–1, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2902, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §112(a), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 672, related to use of grant funds.

Section 3797q–2, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2903, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §112(a), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 673, related to grant applications.

Section 3797q–3, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2904, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §112(a), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 673, related to the Federal share of the total costs of the qualified drug treatment program funded under this subchapter.

Section 3797q–4, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2905, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §112(a), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 673, related to geographic distribution of grants.

Section 3797q–5, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2906, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §112(a), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 673, related to reports and evaluations by grant recipients.

Section 3797q–6, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §2907, as added Pub. L. 110–199, title I, §112(a), Apr. 9, 2008, 122 Stat. 674, defined terms for purposes of this subchapter.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2674 

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow the Medal 

of Honor to be awarded posthumously to Richard L. Etchberger of 

Hamburg, Pennsylvania, for acts of valor on March 11, 1968, while 

an Air Force Chief Master Sergeant serving in Southeast Asia during 

the Vietnam era. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mr. HOLDEN (for himself and Mr. POMEROY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To waive time limitations specified by law in order to allow 

the Medal of Honor to be awarded posthumously to 

Richard L. Etchberger of Hamburg, Pennsylvania, for 

acts of valor on March 11, 1968, while an Air Force 

Chief Master Sergeant serving in Southeast Asia during 

the Vietnam era. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2674 IH 

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR AWARD OF THE MEDAL OF 

2 HONOR TO RICHARD L. ETCHBERGER, FOR 

3 ACTS OF VALOR DURING VIETNAM ERA. 

4 (a) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwith5 standing the time limitations specified in section 8744(b) 

6 of title 10, United States Code, or any other time limita7 tion with respect to the awarding of certain medals to per8 sons who served in the Air Force, the President may 

9 award the Medal of Honor posthumously under section 

10 8741 of that title to Richard L. Etchberger, of Hamburg, 

11 Pennsylvania, for the acts of valor described in subsection 

12 (b). 

13 (b) ACTION DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

14 to in subsection (a) are the actions of Air Force Chief 

15 Master Sergeant Richard L. Etchberger, on March 11, 

16 1968, while on a secret mission manning a radar station 

17 in Laos in fighting off attackers armed with M–16s and 

18 then, while under enemy fire, loading three wounded col19 leagues into a helicopter hoist, in action then resulting in 

20 his own death from hostile fire when finally himself being 

21 hoisted by helicopter. 

Æ
§ 224.6 Prerequisites for issuing a complaint. ( a ) The reviewing official may issue a complaint under § 224.7 only if: ( 1 ) The Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in a written statement described in 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1); and
( 2 ) In the case of allegations of liability under § 224.3(a) with respect to a claim, the reviewing official determines that, with respect to such claim or a group of related claims submitted at the same time such claim is submitted (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the amount of money or the value of property or services demanded or requested in violation of § 224.3(a) does not exceed $150,000.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a related group of claims submitted at the same time shall include only those claims arising from the same transaction (e.g., grant, loan, application, or contract) that are submitted simultaneously as part of a single request, demand, or submission.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the reviewing official's authority to join in a single complaint against a person claims that are unrelated or were not submitted simultaneously, regardless of the amount of money, or the value of property or services, demanded or requested.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Nos. 15-BG-9 & 15-BG-138

IN RE: JOHN W. GREEN,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 476592 BDN: 7-15 & BDN: 38-15

BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and King and Reid, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

On consideration of the certified orders of the Court of Appeals of Maryland

indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see

Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Green, 107 A.3d 1220 (Md. 2015),

Attorney Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. Green, 105 A.3d 500 (Md. 2014), this

court’s January 29, 2015, order suspending respondent and directing him to show

cause why the functionally equivalent discipline in the form of a suspension for a

period of five years or until reinstated to the bar of the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, whichever is first, with his reinstatement conditioned

upon a showing of fitness, should not be imposed, this court’s February 26, 2015,

order consolidating his two pending cases and redirecting respondent to show cause

why the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the

statements of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either

a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar

R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that John M. Green is hereby indefinitely suspended from the

practice of law in the District of Columbia with reinstatement contingent on a

showing of fitness. Respondent is eligible to seek reinstatement after a period of five

years or after reinstatement to the bar of Maryland, whichever occurs first.

Reinstatement is also contingent upon a showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990

A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline

applies to all casesin which the respondent does not participate); In re Maignan, 988

A.2d 493 (D.C. 2010)(the functional equivalent discipline to an indefinite suspension

imposed by the state of Maryland with no set time within which to seek reinstatement 
Nos. 15-BG-9 & 15-BG-138

is an indefinite suspension with a fitness requirement with the right to seek

reinstatement in five years or after reinstatement by the state of Maryland). It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period

of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM
### §3796ee–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ee–1 was editorially reclassified as section 10402 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4424 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyan 1 RO inkjet printing ink. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. CARNEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyan 1 RO inkjet 

printing ink. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYAN 1 RO INKJET PRINTING INK. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.42 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Cyan 1 RO inkjet printing ink) is amended by— 

7 (1) striking ‘‘0.3%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; and 

8 (2) striking ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2015’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4424 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §3796kk–5. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796kk–5 was editorially reclassified as section 10516 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAJ P. SABHLOK and MICHAEL C.

PATTISON,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

No. C-08-4238 EMC

NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING

PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

The Court intends to give the attached instructions at trial commencing on September 7,

2010.

Any objections shall be filed by August 13, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 9, 2010

_________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04238-EMC Document 241 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 1
SPUD_YEARNUM_FRAC_WELLS_HORIZ_DIR

1948 1 1949 4 1951 3 1952 4 1953 2 1954 6 1955 7 1956 7 1957 15 1958 14 1959 16 1960 9 1961 14 1962 19 1963 12 1964 22 1965 21 1966 4 1967 13 1968 11 1969 13 1970 18 1971 10 1972 7 1973 5 1974 7 1975 12 1976 38 1977 29 1978 24 1979 31 1980 52 1981 46 1982 43 1983 84 1984 87 1985 118 1986 150 1987 171 1988 233 1989 290 1990 442 1991 311 1992 295 1993 447 1994 5151995 607

1996 757 1997 700 1998 534 1999 555 2000 919 2001 1,645 2002 1,342 2003 2,237 20043,423 20054,740 2006 6,390 20078,727 200811,734 2009 7,883 20109,047