alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      421,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,521,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,983,361
<PP&E>                                           1,890,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                     385,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,542,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,019,666
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            500
<COMMON>                                               400
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,512,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,542,535
<SALES>                                          1,728,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,728,989
<CGS>                                            1,757,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,757,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (155,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         4,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (160,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (160,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.04)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         287,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  713,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (26,400)
<INVENTORY>                                    108,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,395,894
<PP&E>                                       1,350,832
<DEPRECIATION>                               (423,331)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,610,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,515,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,284
<OTHER-SE>                                    (27,544)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,610,789
<SALES>                                      4,078,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,078,434
<CGS>                                        2,558,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,766,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,608)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (682,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (682,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (682,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
### §3796ee–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ee–2 was editorially reclassified as section 10403 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §3505c. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–63, title II, §203(b), July 29, 1975, 89 Stat. 307

Section, Pub. L. 91–572, §5, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1505, required the Secretary to submit a report to Congress not later than six months after Dec. 24, 1970, setting forth a plan for the implementation of family planning and population research programs under section 300 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective July 1, 1975, see section 608 of Pub. L. 94–63, set out as an Effective Date of 1975 Amendment note under section 247b of this title.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 08-5010 RS (PR)

ORDER DENYING POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

 *E-Filed 2/4/15*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

LARRY REDIC,

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, 

Respondent. /

No. C 08-5010 RS (PR)

ORDER DENYING POSTJUDGMENT MOTIONS

This is a closed federal habeas action. The petition was denied, and judgment entered

in favor of respondent, on December 10, 2014. (Docket Nos. 82 and 83.) Petitioner since

has filed a Notice of Appeal and three post-judgment motions. 

Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability (Docket No. 89) is DENIED as

moot, the Court having declined to issue one, as stated in the order denying the petition. His

motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 90) is DENIED. There is no right to

counsel in habeas corpus actions. See Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir.

1986). A district court is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) to appoint counsel to

represent a habeas petitioner whenever “the court determines that the interests of justice so

require” and such person is financially unable to obtain representation. The decision to

Case 3:08-cv-05010-RS Document 93 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

No. C 08-5010 RS (PR)

2 ORDER DENYING POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS

appoint counsel is within the discretion of the district court, see Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d

1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), and should be granted only when exceptional circumstances are

present. See generally 1 J. Liebman & R. Hertz, Federal Habeas Corpus Practice and

Procedure § 12.3b at 383–86 (2d ed. 1994). Petitioner has not shown that there are

exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of counsel. 

Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 91) is DENIED. The motion

contains no showing of newly-discovered evidence, or that the Court committed clear error

or made an initial decision that was manifestly unjust, or that there was an intervening

change in controlling law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); United Nat. Ins. Co. v. Spectrum

Worldwide, Inc., 555 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Zimmerman v. City of Oakland,

255 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2001)). Nor does the motion contain a showing of

newly-discovered evidence, nor does it set forth any mistake, inadvertence, surprise,

excusable neglect, fraud by the adverse party, or voiding of the judgment; petitioner offers no

other reason justifying relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); School Dist. 1J v. ACandS Inc., 

5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). The Clerk shall terminate Docket Nos. 89, 90, and 91. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 3, 2015 

 RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05010-RS Document 93 Filed 02/03/15 Page 2 of 2
### §4361b. Implementation by Administrator of Environmental Protection Agency of recommendations of "CHESS" Investigative Report; waiver; inclusion of status of implementation requirements in annual revisions of plan for research, development, and demonstration

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall implement the recommendations of the report prepared for the House Committee on Science and Technology entitled "The Environmental Protection Agency Research Program with primary emphasis on the Community Health and Environmental Surveillance System (CHESS): An Investigative Report", unless for any specific recommendation he determines (1) that such recommendation has been implemented, (2) that implementation of such recommendation would not enhance the quality of the research, or (3) that implementation of such recommendation will require funding which is not available. Where such funding is not available, the Administrator shall request the required authorization or appropriation for such implementation. The Administrator shall report the status of such implementation in each annual revision of the five-year plan transmitted to the Congress under section 4361 1 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–155, §10, Nov. 8, 1977, 91 Stat. 1262.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4361 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 104–66, title II, §2021(k)(1), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 728.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978, and not as part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 301.3 Action on requests for declassification review. ( a ) The Director of Security shall present each request for declassification to the Peace Corps Classification Review Committee, which shall consist of the Associate Director for International Operations, the Associate Director for Management and the General Counsel, or their designees, together with his or her recommendation for action.
( b ) Every effort will be made to complete action on each request within 60 days of receipt thereof.
( c ) Information shall be declassified or downgraded as soon as national security considerations permit. If the Classification Review Committee determines that the material for which review is requested no longer requires this protection, it shall be declassified and made available to the requester unless withholding is otherwise authorized by law.
( d ) If the Peace Corps Classification Review Committee determines that requested information must remain classified, the requester shall be given prompt notice of the decision and, if possible, a brief explanation of why the information cannot be declassified.
( e ) The Peace Corps may refuse to confirm or deny the existence or non-existence of requested information whenever the fact of its existence or non-existence is itself classified under E.O. 12356.
( f ) A requester may appeal a refusal to declassify information to the Director of the Peace Corps, or the Director's designee. Appeals shall be in writing, addressed to the Director of the Peace Corps, Washington, DC 20526, and shall briefly state the reasons why the requester believes that the Peace Corps Classification Review Committee decision is in error. Appeals must be submitted within 30 days after receipt of notice of the Classification Review Committee decision. The decision of the Peace Corps Director, or designee, will be based on the entire record, and will be rendered in writing within 60 days after receipt of an appeal. The decision of the Director or Director's designee is the final Peace Corps action on a request.
EXHIBIT 10.9

     AGREEMENT ON TRANSFER OF SHARES OF HENAN ZHONGPIN FOOD SHARE CO., LTD.
     DATED MAY 23, 2005 BETWEEN BEN BAO KE AND HENAN ZHONGPIN FOOD CO., LTD.

             Ben Baoke transfers to Henan Zhongpin Food Co., Ltd. 1,007,937
shares of the common stock of Henan Zhongpin Food Share Co., Ltd. ("the
Operating Company"), par value RMB 1.00, representing approximately 6.7% of the
Operating Company's issued and outstanding shares. Upon completion of the stock
transfer, Ben Baoke shall still hold 111,994 shares of the Operating Company's
common stock, representing approximately 0.74% of the Operating Company's issued
and outstanding shares.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JAY VEDERMAN,

 Petitioner

 v.

KEIRA GRASSI VEDERMAN,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 519 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
### §5680. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5680 was editorially reclassified as section 11190 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
§ 501.3 Noncompetitive interchange between Civil Service and Foreign Service. ( a ) An agreement between the Office of Personnel Management and the Board under the provisions of Executive Order 11219 (3 CFR 1964-65 Comp. p. 303) provides for the noncompetitive appointment of present or former Foreign Service employees as career or career conditional Civil Service employees.
( b ) Under this agreement former career personnel of the Board's Foreign Service (FSCR, FSRU, FSIO, FSS, FSO, or FP) and such present personnel desiring to transfer, are eligible, under certain conditions, for noncompetitive career or career-conditional appointment in any Federal agency that desires to appoint them. The President has authorized the Office of Personnel Management by executive order to waive the requirements for competitive examination and appointment for such Board career Foreign Service personnel.
( c ) A present or former Civil Service employee may be appointed on a competitive basis in any Foreign Service class for which the employee has qualified under the provisions of section 3947 of title 22, United States Code.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 262

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study and submit to 

Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with 

dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Education to conduct a study 

and submit to Congress a report on methods for identifying and treating children with dyslexia in kindergarten 

through third grade.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Early Detection of 

5 Dyslexia in Children Act of 2005’’. 
2

•HR 262 IH 

1 SEC. 2. STUDY AND REPORT BY SECRETARY OF EDUCATION 

2 ON IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT OF 

3 CHILDREN WITH DYSLEXIA IN KINDER4 GARTEN THROUGH THIRD GRADE. 

5 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Education, in con6 sultation with the National Academy of Sciences, shall 

7 conduct a study on methods for identifying and treating 

8 children with dyslexia in kindergarten through third 

9 grade. In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall con10 sider—

11 (1) whether there is a biological basis for dys12 lexia; 

13 (2) whether dyslexia is caused by—

14 (A) a brain-based phonological deficit that 

15 prevents an individual from breaking down 

16 written words into component sounds; 

17 (B) post-natal experience, including inad18 equate instruction; or 

19 (C) a combination thereof; and 

20 (3) the cost of implementing a program on a 

21 nationwide basis to identify and treat children with 

22 dyslexia in kindergarten through third grade. 

23 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

24 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Education 
3

•HR 262 IH 

1 shall prepare and submit to Congress a report containing 

2 the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

Æ
### §5517. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Appropriations to National Aeronautics and Space Administration

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, $5,000,000, to remain available until expended, to carry out the functions vested in the Administrator by this subchapter.

#### (b) Appropriations to Department of Housing and Urban Development

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, $5,000,000, to remain available until expended. Any sums so appropriated shall be available (1) to carry out the functions vested in the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by this subchapter, and (2) for transfer to the Department of Defense, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the General Services Administration to enable them to carry out their respective functions under this subchapter.

#### (c) Appropriations for programs under this subchapter

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1976, 1977, 1978, and 1979, $50,000,000 in the aggregate to carry out the programs established by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 93–409, §19, Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1078; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "National Bureau of Standards".
#### § 506.1 Purpose of program.

Many individuals in society possess great productive potential which goes unrealized because they cannot meet the requirements of a standard workweek. Permanent part-time employment also provides benefits to other individuals in a variety of ways, such as providing older individuals with a gradual transition into retirement, providing employment opportunities to handicapped individuals or others who require a reduced workweek, providing parents opportunities to balance family responsibilities with the need for additional income, providing employment opportunities for women returning to the workforce and assisting students who must finance their own education or vocational training. In view of this, the Broadcasting Board of Governors will operate a part-time career employment program, consistent with the needs of its beneficiaries and its responsibilities.
#### BAMBERGER, Appellant, v. AMERICAN SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 3, 1905.)

Action by Ira Leo Bamberger against the American Surety Company of New York. No opinion. Ordér affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
§ 1503.3 Custody and authorization to affix. ( a ) The seal is the official emblem of the African Development Foundation and its use is therefore permitted only as provided in this part.
( b ) The seal shall be kept in the custody of the General Counsel, or any other person he authorizes, and should be affixed by him, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or the President of the African Development Foundation to authenticate records of the Foundation and for other official purposes. The General Counsel may redelegate and authorize redelegation of this authority.
( c ) The President of the African Development Foundation shall designate and prescribe by internal written delegation and policies the use of the seal for other publication and display purposes and those Foundation officials authorized to affix the seal for these purposes.
( d ) Use by any person or organization outside of the Foundation may be made only with the Foundation's prior written approval. Such request must be made in writing to the General Counsel.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Macinski, Respondent, v Village of Johnson City et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed September 25, 1975, which determined that the cardiac disablement of claimant was job related and compensable. Claimant, a first-class fireman with 20 years experience with the Village of Johnson City and with a medical history of angina pectoris, reported to work at 8:00 a.m. on July 6, 1974. Within 40 minutes, after answering roll call and walking up a steep 20-step staircase to the second floor of the fire station, claimant became involved in a heated argument with a junior fireman over seating arrangements in the station kitchen causing him to become so emotionally upset that he struck the other fireman in the face. Shortly thereafter he was hospitalized, placed in the coronary intensive care unit for two days, and on July 8, 1974 it was medically determined that claimant had suffered a myocardial infarction. The questions to be decided are whether there is substantial evidence to support the board’s finding that claimant met with accidental injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment, and the adequacy of the medical proof establishing the causal relationship between the emotional strain and the cardiac event *(Matter of Millar v Town of Newburgh,*43 AD2d 641; cf. *Matter of McCormick v Green Bus Lines,*29 NY2d 246). Since firemen on duty are required to be available at all times to respond to an alarm, it is in the employer’s interest to provide kitchen facilities within the fire station. Thus, claimant was in his work environment and the altercation must be deemed to have occurred in the course of his employment *(Matter of Dorman v New Process Gear Div. Chrysler Corp.,*44 AD2d 8, affd 35 NY2d 975). Unlike *Matter of Millar (supra),*the stair climbing and the altercation herein went beyond "irritations” usually associated with one’s employment and constituted emotional stress and strain with respect to this claimant that must be equated with an industrial accidént *(Matter of Schuren v Wolfson,*30 NY2d 90). Next, two *975qualified cardiologists gave divergent views as to the relationship of the emotional strain caused by the argument and step climbing and claimant’s myocardial infarction. Thus, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s finding that the superimposition of severe emotional trauma upon a diseased cardiovascular system caused claimant’s compensable cardiac disability. Factual findings should not be overturned on appeal (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 20; *Matter of Sloman v Roger Detective Bur.,*48 AD2d 984). Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Koreman, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Mahoney and Herlihy, JJ., concur.