alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 35.42 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the authority head imposing penalties or assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

CARLOS QUILES, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COURT OF COMMON OF PLEAS 

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 85 EM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See 

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (stating that hybrid representation is not 

permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from At Home
Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         117,247
<SECURITIES>                                   316,586
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,295)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               538,851
<PP&E>                                         191,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                (66,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,055,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,823
<BONDS>                                        232,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,001,005
<OTHER-SE>                                   (390,853)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,055,547
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,640
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               301,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,070)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (236,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (236,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (236,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.89)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted via teleconference. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, January 19, 2005, at 1 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Barbara Toy at 1-888-912-1227, or 414-297-1611. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Joint Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) will be held Wednesday, January 19, 2005, at 1 p.m. Eastern daylight time via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the Joint Committee of TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 414-297-1611, or write Barbara Toy, TAP Office, MS-1006-MIL, 310 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or FAX to 414-297-1623, or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Barbara Toy. Ms. Toy can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-297-1611, or FAX 414-297-1623.                 

The agenda will include the following: monthly committee summary report, discussion of issues brought to the joint committee, office report, and discussion of next meeting. 

Dated: December 17, 2004. 

Bernard Coston, 

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 04-28015 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2473 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 relating to determining the all-others 

rate in antidumping cases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. SHAW introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 relating to determining 

the all-others rate in antidumping cases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF ALL-OTHERS RATE IN 

4 ANTIDUMPING CASES. 

5 Subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 735(c)(5) of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(c)(5)) are each 

7 amended by striking ‘‘entirely’’. 

Æ
### §15853. Rebate program

#### (1) Establishment

The Secretary shall establish a program providing rebates for consumers for expenditures made for the installation of a renewable energy system in connection with a dwelling unit or small business.

#### (2) Amount of rebate

Rebates provided under the program established under paragraph (1) shall be in an amount not to exceed the lesser of—

(A) 25 percent of the expenditures described in paragraph (1) made by the consumer; or

(B) $3,000.

#### (3) Definition

For purposes of this section, the term "renewable energy system" has the meaning given that term in section 6865(c)(6)(A) of this title.

#### (4) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for carrying out this section, to remain available until expended—

(A) $150,000,000 for fiscal year 2006;

(B) $150,000,000 for fiscal year 2007;

(C) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2008;

(D) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; and

(E) $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.

(Pub. L. 109–58, title II, §206(c), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 655.)
#### § 311.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. sections 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
The Honor able Nancy C. Dreher, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District o f 1 Minnesota. 

## United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

____________ 98-6026MN

____________ In re: David A. Russ * * Debtor * * Kevin J. Lamson * * Appellant * Appeal from the United States * Bankruptcy Court for the * District of Minnesota v. * * David A. Russ * * Appellee *

____________ Submitted: June 9, 1998 Filed: July 7, 1998

____________ Befor e KOGER, Chief Judge, SCHERMER and SCOTT, Bankruptcy Appellate Pane l Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Kevi n J. Lamson timely appeals from a bankruptcy court order that denied hi s 1 motion seeking sanctions against the debtor, David A. Russ , and the debtor’s attorneys, Faye2

Knowles and David Marshall, under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011 and requesting an o rder directing the debtor and his attorneys to show cause why they should not be held in contempt of court, and that ordered Lamson to pay the reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees incurred by the debtor and his attorneys in opposing his motion. We a ffirm based on the thorough and wellreasoned opinion of the bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy co urt’s order is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Se e 8 Cir. R. 47B; 8 Cir. th th BAP Local R. 8001A(b)(4).
Affirmed. A true copy.
Attest. CLERK, U.S. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Editorial Note on Part 65
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 65 appear at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999.

§ 65.1 Regulations to be drafted. Subject to the provisions and requirements of this part, appropriate administrative regulations shall be drafted by each executive department or agency of the Government which maintains and administers educational institutions and schools coming within the scope of the legislation. Such regulations shall carefully observe the limitations imposed by the Act of June 24, 1938, and shall in each case include: ( a ) A list of the institutions and courses in the department or agency concerned in which instruction is available under the terms of the legislation.
( b ) A statement of the maximum number of students of the other American republics who may be accommodated in each such institution or course at any one time.
( c ) A statement of the qualifications to be required of students of the other American republics for admission, including examinations, if any, to be passed.
( d ) Provisions to safeguard information that may be vital to the national defense or other interests of the United States.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-12704

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cr-00308-CEH-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL ANTONIO SILVA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(April 12, 2021)

Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-12704 Date Filed: 04/12/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2

Scott Robbins, appointed counsel for Manuel Silva in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Silva’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-12704 Date Filed: 04/12/2021 Page: 2 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLEN ELLEN CAPITAL COMPANY

INC., a California corporation, doing

business as COWBOY HIDEAWAY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CROSS COUNTRY INTERNATIONAL

CORP., doing business as EQUESTRIAN

VACATIONS, and DOES 1 through 50,

inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-03824 WHA

ORDER SETTING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Due to the bankruptcy of defendant, this case is stayed. A case management conference is

SET for SEPTEMBER 16, 2010, AT 11:00 A.M. Please file a joint case management statement at

least seven days prior. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-03824-WHA Document 29 Filed 01/08/10 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4367 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4367

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to limit the fee disclosure 
   requirement for an automatic teller machine to the screen of that 
                                machine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.

    Section 904(d)(3)(B) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 
U.S.C. 1693b(d)(3)(B)) (commonly known as the ``Electronic Fund 
Transfer Act'') is amended--
            (1) by striking ``requirements.'' and all that follows 
        through ``The notice required under clauses (i) and (ii)'' and 
        inserting ``requirement.--The notice required under clauses (i) 
        and (ii)'' after ``Notice''; and
            (2) by striking ``, except that during the period 
        beginning'' and all that follows and inserting a period.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 9, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4367

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to limit the fee disclosure 
   requirement for an automatic teller machine to the screen of that 
                                machine.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., etal.,

Defendant(s).

))))))))))))

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ     C08-4118 BZ     C09-2016 BZ

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY

Maximus’s motion to lift the stay is DENIED.  The issues

presented to the Court by the various summary judgment motions

are sufficiently complex that the Court sees no need to

further complicate one of them by requiring additional

analyses of the factual circumstances of plaintiffs other than

Fujisawa.  While the Court is inclined to agree with Maximus’s

notion that the ruling as to Fujisawa should “be equally

dispositive” as to the other plaintiffs, the Court will

reserve that decision for the future.

Dated: July 15, 2010

  Bernard Zimmerman

  United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\ORDER DENYING MAXIMUS MOT TOLIFT STAY.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ   Document 102   Filed 07/16/10   Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

VOLODYMYR STEPANENKO,

Appellant,

v.

PAULO FASSMAN CORREIA, ET AL.,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-702

[April 6, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

PRC2000003131.

Morgan L. Weinstein of Twig, Trade, & Tribunal, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellant.

Scott A. Weiss and R. Daniel Sirois of Scott A. Weiss, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 218
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 218 appear at 68 FR 51363, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 218.03 Definitions. ( a ) The following terms used in this part are defined in the government-wide regulations (45 CFR 90.4, 44 FR 33768): Act Action Age Age distinction Age-related term Federal financial assistance Recipient (including subrecipients) United States
( b ) As used in this part, ( 1 ) *Agency* means the Department of State, the U.S. International Communication Agency, and the Agency for International Development.
( 2 ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of State, the Director of the U.S. International Communication Agency, and the Administrator of the Agency for International Development, or the designee of such officer.
( 3 ) *Subrecipient* means any of the entities in the definition of “recipient” to which a recipient extends or passes on Federal financial assistance. A subrecipient is generally regarded as a recipient of Federal financial assistance and has all the duties of a recipient in these regulations.
( 4 ) *Program or activity* means all of the operations of any entity described in paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (iv) of this section, any part of which is extended Federal financial assistance: ( i ) ( A ) A department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or of a local government; or
( B ) The entity of such State or local government that distributes such assistance and each such department or agency (and each other State or local government entity) to which the assistance is extended, in the case of assistance to a State or local government;
( ii ) ( A ) A college, university, or other postsecondary institution, or a public system of higher education; or
( B ) A local educational agency (as defined in 20 U.S.C. 7801), system of vocational education, or other school system;
( iii ) ( A ) An entire corporation, partnership, or other private organization, or an entire sole proprietorship— ( 1 ) If assistance is extended to such corporation, partnership, private organization, or sole proprietorship as a whole; or
( 2 ) Which is principally engaged in the business of providing education, health care, housing, social services, or parks and recreation; or
( B ) The entire plant or other comparable, geographically separate facility to which Federal financial assistance is extended, in the case of any other corporation, partnership, private organization, or sole proprietorship; or
( iv ) Any other entity which is established by two or more of the entities described in paragraph (b)(4)(i), (ii), or (iii) of this section.
[45 FR 62980, Sept. 23, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51363, Aug. 26, 2003]
### §3797s–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797s–3 was editorially reclassified as section 10594 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 1 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page1 of 12
Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page2 of 12

16 *

* Jurisdiction will only be maintained for a period of three years from the date of this order. 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 3 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page3 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 4 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page4 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 5 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page5 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 6 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page6 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 7 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page7 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 8 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page8 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 9 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page9 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 10 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page10 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 11 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page11 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document 61 Filed 02/16/10 Page 12 of 12 Case3:08-cv-04697-WHA Document60 Filed02/12/10 Page12 of 12
### §§300ff–41 to 300ff–50. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–345, title III, §301(a), Oct. 20, 2000, 114 Stat. 1345

Section 300ff–41, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2641, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 597; amended Pub. L. 102–531, title III, §312(d)(31), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3506, established program of formula grants to States.

Section 300ff–42, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2642, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 599, related to provision of services through medicaid providers.

Section 300ff–43, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2643, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 600; amended Pub. L. 102–531, title III, §312(d)(32), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3506, related to requirement of matching funds.

Section 300ff–44, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2644, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 601, related to the offering and encouraging of early intervention services.

Section 300ff–45, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2645, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 602, related to notification of certain individuals receiving blood transfusions.

Section 300ff–46, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2646, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 602, related to reporting and partner notification.

Section 300ff–47, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2647, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 603; amended Pub. L. 101–502, §6(c), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1291; Pub. L. 104–146, §12(c)(4), May 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1373, related to requirement of State law protection against intentional transmission.

Section 300ff–48, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2648, formerly Pub. L. 100–607, title IX, §902, Nov. 4, 1988, 102 Stat. 3171; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2605(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4234; renumbered §2648 and amended Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(b), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 614; Pub. L. 104–146, §12(c)(5), May 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1374, related to testing and other early intervention services for State prisoners.

Section 300ff–49, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2649, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 604; amended Pub. L. 101–502, §6(b), Nov. 3, 1990, 104 Stat. 1290; Pub. L. 102–531, title III, §312(d)(33), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3506; Pub. L. 104–146, §12(c)(6), May 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1374, related to determination of amount of allotments.

Section 300ff–49a, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2649A, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 605, related to miscellaneous prerequisites for the Secretary to make a grant.

Section 300ff–50, act July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVI, §2650, as added Pub. L. 101–381, title III, §301(a), Aug. 18, 1990, 104 Stat. 606, authorized appropriations.
#### Job E. Hedges, as Receiver of the New York Railways Company, Respondent, v. John F. Hylan and Others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.