alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying  Quarterly Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"),  I, George P. Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 15, 2005
                                                          /s/ George P. Morris
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         George P. Morris
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 3:08-cv-05005-MMC Document 65 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:08-cv-05005-MMC Document64 Filed08/13/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-05005-MMC Document 65 Filed 08/16/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:08-cv-05005-MMC Document64 Filed08/13/10 Page2 of 3
Case3:08-cv-05005-MMC Document64 Filed08/13/10 Page3 of 3

16

Case 3:08-cv-05005-MMC Document 65 Filed 08/16/10 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  347,232
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               356,678
<PP&E>                                       9,618,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                (670,373) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,304,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,304,740
<SALES>                                      1,020,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,022,770
<CGS>                                          819,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  819,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               113,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,387
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             90,387
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    90,387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 519.100 Conditions on use of funds. ( a ) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative ageement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, set forth in appendix A, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
( d ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, set forth in appendix A, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
( e ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2483 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.87.18 Brakes designed for bicycles 

(other than drum brakes, 

caliper and cantilever brakes 

and coaster brakes) and 

parts thereof (provided in 

subheading 8714.94.90) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2483 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4111 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4111

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   certain State foster care program payments made to the biological 
                     parents of disabled children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 29, 2012

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
   certain State foster care program payments made to the biological 
                     parents of disabled children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF CERTAIN STATE FOSTER CARE 
              PROGRAM PAYMENTS MADE TO BIOLOGICAL PARENTS OF DISABLED 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 131 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(3) Application to biological parents receiving payments 
        through state foster care programs.--A payment made pursuant to 
        a foster care program of a State or political subdivision 
        thereof shall not fail to be treated as a difficulty of care 
        payment which is excludible from gross income under subsection 
        (a) solely because the qualified foster individual with respect 
        to which such payment is made is the biological child of the 
        foster care provider.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to payments made in taxable years ending after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:08-cv-03707-CRB Document 15 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-03707-CRB Document 15 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2
### §3194. Administration, operation, and maintenance

The Secretary shall approve Federal assistance under this chapter only if the Secretary is satisfied that the project for which Federal assistance is granted will be properly and efficiently administered, operated, and maintained.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3194, Pub. L. 89–136, title V, §515, as added Pub. L. 94–188, title II, §204, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1088, related to energy demonstration projects and programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, title XVIII, §1821(a)(8), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 766, effective Sept. 30, 1981.

A prior section 504 of Pub. L. 89–136 was classified to section 3184 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 97–35, §1821(a)(8).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
#### Frank Case Hayden, Appellant, v. New York Railways Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Smith, Page and Merrell, JJ.; Laughlin and Smith, JJ., dissenting.
#### In the Matter of Yetta Rosengarten, as Administratrix, Appellant. Sarah Bokser, Respondent.

Motion for an enlargement of time granted, insofar as to extend the appellant’s time to serve and file the record on appeal and appellant’s points to and including December 5, 1960, with notice of argument for the January 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
§ 229.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
#### Pilgrim Homes and Garages, Inc., Respondent, v Irwin F. Deutsch, Appellant.

In an action to recover the balance due plaintiff for furnishing labor and materials to construct a private dwelling home for defendant, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 13, 1977, which (1) denied that branch of his motion, made pursuant to CPLR 3216, which sought dismissal of the complaint, and (2) conditionally granted that branch of his motion which sought an order of preclusion. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to serve a proper bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Special Term’s resolution of defendant-appellant’s motion was, in all respects, a proper exercise of discretion. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
1 

l 

' 

LAW OFFICES OF 

DOUGLAS, KELLY, 0STDIEK and OsSIAN 

PHILIP M. KELLY 

JERALD L. OSTDIEK 

JASON A. OSSIAN 

DAVID P. BRODERICK* 

AMANDA M. VOGL 

*Also licensed in Colorado 

Email: jostdiek@scottsblufftaw.com 

a professional corporation 

RICHAt_{l;> A. DOUGLAS 

( 1945-20 12) 

June 4, 2014 

Via Email: Kevin.Schlemmer@dot.gov 

Kevin Schlemmer, Chief 

Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Room W86-309 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: Western Nebraska Regional A1ib.ort 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

1 05 East 16th Street 

P.O. Box419 

Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69363-0419 

Telephone: (308) 632-7191 

............... 

248 Main Street 

Crawford, Nebraska 69339 

Telephone: (308) 665-1169 

Fax: (308) 635-1387 

: •' ,,,~:: ..... . 

As you are aware, this office represents Western Nebraska Regional Airport, Scotts Bluff 

County, Nebraska. I appreciate you discussing this matter with me previously. I am writing 

this letter with regards to the Department of Transpmiation's determination of mileage for 

essential air service regarding Western Nebraska Regional Airport's mileage to the nearest hub. 

It is my understanding that the Department of Transportation has determined the mileage from 

the city of Scottsbluff to Denver International Airport to be less than 21 0 miles. I have run 

numerous maps using the route designated in the April 24, 2006 letter from Norman Y. Mineta to 

Congressman Osborne (a copy of which is enclosed). All of these maps (enclosed) result in the 

distance between Scottsbluff and Denv~r International Airport as being greater than 210 miles. 

Please review and give me a call to discuss the reason for the discrepancy. 

JLO:rlg 

Enclosure 

cc: Darwin Skelton, Airport Manager 

Donald E. Overman, Board Chair 

Sincerely, 

DOUGLAS, KELLY, OSTDIEK and OSSIAN 

', \1-·ofessional corporation , 

--~·· ~·d ee({c~: 

erald L. Ostdiek
#### § 123.28 Scope of a license.

Unless limited by a condition set out in a license, the export, reexport, retransfer, or temporary import authorized by a license is for the item(s), end-use(s), and parties described in the license application and any letters of explanation. DDTC grants licenses in reliance on representations the applicant made in or submitted in connection with the license application, letters of explanation, and other documents submitted.

[81 FR 35616, June 3, 2016]
#### VIRDEN v. THOMAS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department

April 7, 1905.)

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by William H. Virden against Orlando F. Thomas and another. From an order denying a motion by defendant Thomas to change the place of trial, he appeals. Reversed.

Argued before VAN BRUNT, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, PATTERSON, INGRAHAM, and LAUGHLIN, JJ.

Frank Brundage, for appellant.

Charles A. Brodek, for respondent.

McLAUGHLIN, J.

The defendant Thomas appeals from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of New *997York to the county of Wayne. The facts set out in the record bearing upon the question of the change of place of trial are precisely the same as in Washington v. Thomas (decided herewith) 92 N. Y. Supp. 994, and for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in that case the order here appealed from must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, to abide event. All concur.
#### ADAMS, Appellant, v. MASSEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 8, 1905.)

Action by Jesse M. Adams, administrator, etc., against George B. Massey. No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of the Election of Directors of the Fifth Madison Corporation. Frances M. Purdy et al., Individually and as Executrices of Herbert McL. Purdy, Deceased; Fifth Madison Corporation, et al.

— -M-dtion for "leave to reargue or for leave to -a-ppeal to -the Court -of Appeals -denied, with $10 costs. Concur — ¡Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
### §3020b. Reduction of paperwork

In order to reduce unnecessary, duplicative, or disruptive demands for information, the Assistant Secretary, in consultation with State agencies and other appropriate agencies and organizations, shall continually review and evaluate all requests by the Administration for information under this chapter and take such action as may be necessary to reduce the paperwork required under this chapter. The Assistant Secretary shall request only such information as the Assistant Secretary deems essential to carry out the objectives and provisions of this chapter and, in gathering such information, shall make use of uniform service definitions to the extent that such definitions are available.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title II, §211, formerly §212, as added Pub. L. 95–478, title I, §102(i), Oct. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 1515; renumbered §211, Pub. L. 97–115, §2(e)(2), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1596; amended Pub. L. 98–459, title II, §208, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1771; Pub. L. 102–375, title I, §102(b)(1)(A), (9)(A), title IX, §904(a)(9), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1200, 1201, 1306; Pub. L. 103–171, §§2(6), 3(a)(13), Dec. 2, 1993, 107 Stat. 1988, 1990.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 211 of Pub. L. 89–73 was renumbered section 210 and is classified to section 3020a of this title.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–171 substituted "Assistant Secretary" for "Commissioner" wherever appearing and "State agencies" for "State agencies,".

1992—Pub. L. 102–375, §904(a)(9), substituted "objectives" for "purposes" in last sentence.

Pub. L. 102–375, §102(b)(9)(A), struck out "designated under section 3025(a)(1) of this title" after "in consultation with State agencies".

Pub. L. 102–375, §102(b)(1)(A), substituted "Administration" for "Administration on Aging".

1984—Pub. L. 98–459 inserted provision requiring the Commissioner, in gathering information, to make use of uniform service definitions to the extent that such definitions are available.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–459 effective Oct. 9, 1984, see section 803(a) of Pub. L. 98–459, set out as a note under section 3001 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective at close of Sept. 30, 1978, see section 504 of Pub. L. 95–478, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 3001 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned
Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  for
the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 19, 2014

/s/ R. Greg Smith

R. Greg Smith

Chief Financial Officer
#### Mary Chesbrough, Respondent, v Leslie Chesbrough, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Franklin County, entered November 24, 1976, which reduced a prior support order to $30 per week and further ordered the appellant to pay an additional sum of $5 per week to cover arrearages in the sum of $60. We note that although the incomes and expenses of the parties were comparable at the time of the hearing and both were supporting only themselves, the appellant had sole title to and possession of the marital residence, free of liens and encumbrances. The respondent had worked from the time of her marriage to the appellant in 1949 until their separation in 1976. Upon a review of this record in its entirety we cannot say that the Family Court abused its discretion, upon the appellant’s application for a modification of the previous support order, in only reducing the amount of support from $40 to $30 per week (Family *1035Ct Act, § 412). Order affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Larkin, JJ., concur.
### §5085. Availability of appropriations

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, unless enacted in express and specific limitation of the provisions of this section, funds appropriated for any fiscal year to carry out any program under this chapter or any predecessor authority shall remain available, in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, for obligation and expenditure until expended.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title V, §505, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 416.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 394, known as the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4950 of this title and Tables.
§ 96.6 Performance criteria for designation as an accrediting entity. An entity that seeks to be designated as an accrediting entity must demonstrate to the Secretary: ( a ) That it has a governing structure, the human and financial resources, and systems of control adequate to ensure its reliability;
( b ) That it is capable of performing the accreditation or approval functions or both on a timely basis and of administering any renewal cycle authorized under § 96.60;
( c ) That it can monitor the performance of agencies it has accredited and persons it has approved (including their use of any supervised providers) to ensure their continued compliance with the Convention, the IAA, the UAA, and the regulations implementing the IAA or UAA;
( d ) That it has the capacity to take appropriate adverse actions against agencies it has accredited and persons it has approved;
( e ) That it can perform the required data collection, reporting, and other similar functions;
( f ) Except in the case of a public entity, that it operates independently of any agency or person that provides adoption services, and of any membership organization that includes agencies or persons that provide adoption services;
( g ) That it has the capacity to conduct its accreditation and approval functions fairly and impartially;
( h ) That it can comply with any conflict-of-interest prohibitions set by the Secretary in its agreement;
( i ) That it prohibits conflicts of interest with agencies or persons or with any membership organization that includes agencies or persons that provide adoption services; and
( j ) That it prohibits its employees or other individuals acting as site evaluators, including, but not limited to, volunteer site evaluators, from becoming employees or supervised providers of an agency or person for at least one year after they have evaluated such agency or person for accreditation or approval.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40633, July 14, 2014]