alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 92.60 Examination procedures. ( a ) *Explaining interrogatory to witness.* If the witness does not understand what an interrogatory means, the notarizing officer should explain it to him, if possible, but only so as to get an answer strictly responsive to the interrogatory.
( b ) *Refreshing memory by reference to written records.* A witness may be permitted to refresh his memory by referring to notes, papers or other documents. The notarizing officer should have such occurrence noted in the record of the testimony together with a statement of his opinion as to whether the witness was using the notes, papers or other documents to refresh his memory or for the sake of testifying to matters not then of his personal knowledge.
( c ) *Conferring with counsel.* When the witness confers with counsel before answering any interrogatory, the notarizing officer should have that fact noted in the record of the testimony.
( d ) *Examining witness as to personal knowledge.* The notarizing officer may at any time during the examination of a witness propound such inquiries as may be necessary to satisfy himself whether the witness is testifying from his personal knowledge of the subject matter of the examination.
( e ) *Witness not to leave officer's presence.* The notarizing officer should request the witness not to leave his presence during the examination, except during the recesses for meals, rest, etc., authorized in § 92.56 (g). Failure of the witness to comply with this request must be noted in the record.
[22 FR 10858, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 60 FR 51723, Oct. 3, 1995]
1 CASE NO. C08 04606 JW

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN JOSE DIVISION 

BERNARDO REYES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

PREMIER HOME FUNDING, INC., a 

California corporation; WORLD SAVINGS 

BANK, FSB; WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., and 

JOEL MADERA CANDELARIO, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C08 04606 JW 

[Hon. James Ware, District Judge] 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RE: LAST DAY 

FOR HEARING ON DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

 

 Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties and for GOOD CAUSE APPEARING 

THEREFOR: 

 The Court’s July 1, 2009 Scheduling Order is hereby modified as follows: The Laste Date 

for Hearing Dispositive Motion is now March ___, 2010 which represents the next available 

hearing date consistent with Plaintiff counsel’s availability. The hearing on Defendant Wachovia 

Mortgage’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment will be heard on that 

date 9:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 

 JAMES WARE 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22 January 12, 2010 

Case 3:08-cv-04606-JSW Document 73 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1
### §7159. Transfer to Department of Transportation

Notwithstanding section 7151(a) of this title, there are transferred to, and vested in, the Secretary of Transportation all of the functions vested in the Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration by section 6361(b)(1)(B) of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §310, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 582.)
### §5791b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5791b was editorially reclassified as section 20503 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Louis Alvarez.

Enlargement of time granted. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
#### § 903.2 Record of proceedings.

Upon receipt of initial documents relating to a case, a record of proceedings shall be established, and all material received or obtained by the Board in connection with the case shall be placed in it unless the Board excludes such material under § 903.3. The parties and the exclusive representative, if any, shall have access to the record of proceedings. Classified portions of the record of proceedings may be reviewed by the parties and the exclusive representative, if any, under conditions prescribed by the Board to ensure appropriate security.
§ 309.5 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by statute, contract or excluded in accordance with FCCS, Peace Corps will assess: ( 1 ) Interest on unpaid debts in accordance with 31 CFR 901.9.
( 2 ) Penalty charges at a rate of 6 percent a year or such other rate as authorized by law on any portion of a claim that is delinquent for more than 90 days.
( 3 ) Administrative charges to cover the costs of processing and handling delinquent debts.
( 4 ) Late payment charges that shall be computed from the date of mailing or hand delivery of the notice of the claim and interest requirements.
( b ) When a debt is paid in partial or installment payments, amounts received shall be applied first to outstanding penalty and administrative cost charges, second to accrued interest, and then to outstanding principal.
( c ) *Waiver.* Peace Corps will consider waiver of interest, penalties and/or administrative costs in accordance with the FCCS, 31 CFR 901.9(g).
### §§4844, 4845. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588

Section 4844, Pub. L. 91–695, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 93–151, §7(e), Nov. 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 567, related to the eligibility of certain State agencies with respect to grants made under former sections 4801 and 4811 of this title.

Section 4845, Pub. L. 91–695, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 93–151, §7(e), Nov. 9, 1973, 87 Stat. 568, provided for the establishment of a National Childhood Lead Based Paint Poisoning Advisory Board.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 95–626, title II, §208(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3588, provided that the repeal is effective Oct. 1, 1979.
#### The Q. R. S. Company, Respondent, v. Phillips-Jones Corporation, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn investigation of transitional management problems for the NSTS at NASA, executive summaryA summary is given of the work of the University of Houston research team for the third quarter of effort in a yearly grant for the National Space Transportation System (NSTS). As such it serves as a resting place for the ideas and concepts developed this quarter with the collaboration of the Management Integration Offices of NASA. Another objective is the hope that the report will help to stimulate the healthy problem solving process already present at NASA. The main goal of the contractual work is to help NASA to find ways and means of moving into a truly operational era with the shuttle program. This work is a continuation of early work and the reader is encouraged to read the final reports of earlier years. Chapter One of the report is an introduction. Chapter Two deals with industrial adaptation and is in two parts: theory and application. In the theory section, impressions of the management system immediately after reflight are discussed. A key issue, in the author's opinion is the seeming lack of purpose of the program. The application section has six appendices: 1988 Demographic Survey, Field Notes of Interview with HL/P South Texas Nuclear Project, a comparison of the Agendas of the current manager with that of a previous manager, a note on compartmentalization to assist in manifesting, a study on launch prediction for STS-26, and a discussion of a statistical decision-making course for upper level managers. Chapter Three deals with theoretical results returned on flow shop scheduling which will be of use downstream. Chapter Four deals with a statistical model developed to predict the flight rate in future years and indicates the program will have trouble making its schedule. Chapter Five covers the constructural effort and shows the work to be on schedule.Document ID19890006400Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHunsucker, John*(Houston Univ. TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 15, 1988Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-172096NAS 1.26:172096Accession Number89N15771Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890006400.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1414.9 Penalties and enforcement. ( a ) Where the nature and circumstances of a prohibited communication made by or caused to be made by a party to the proceeding are such that the interests of justice and statutory policy may require remedial action, the Board, Administrative Law Judge, or Regional Director, as appropriate, may issue to the party making the communication a notice to show cause, returnable before the Board, Administrative Law Judge, or Regional Director, within a stated period not less than seven (7) days from the date thereof, why the Board, Administrative Law Judge, or Regional Director should not determine that the interests of justice and statutory policy require that the claim or interest in the proceeding of a party who knowingly makes a prohibited communication or knowingly causes a prohibited communication to be made, should be dismissed, denied, disregarded or otherwise adversely affected on account of such violation.
( b ) Upon notice and hearing, the Board may censure, suspend or revoke the privilege of practice before the agency of any person who knowingly and willfully makes or solicits the making of a prohibited ex parte communication. However, before the Board institutes formal proceedings under this section, it shall first advise the person or persons concerned in writing that it proposes to take such action and that they may show cause, within a period to be stated in such written advice, but not less than seven (7) days from the date thereof, why it should not take such action.
( c ) The Board may censure, or, to the extent permitted by law, suspend, dismiss, or institute proceedings for the dismissal of, any Board agent who knowingly and willfully violates the prohibitions and requirements of this rule.
§ 503.3 Availability of agency records. ( a ) *Release of records.* If we have released a record or part of a record to others in the past, we will ordinarily release it to you also. This principle does not apply if the previous release was an unauthorized disclosure. However, we will not release it to you if a statute forbids this disclosure and we will not necessarily release it to you if an exemption applies in your situation and did not apply or applied differently in the previous situation.
( b ) *Denial of requests.* All denials are in writing and describe in general terms the material withheld and state the reasons for the denial, including a reference to the specific exemption of the FOIA authorizing the withholding or deletion. The denial also explains your right to appeal the decision and it will identify the official to whom you should send the appeal. Denial letters are signed by the person who made the decision to deny all or part of the request, unless otherwise noted.
( c ) *Unproductive searches.* We will make a diligent search for records to satisfy your request. Nevertheless, we may not be able always to find the records you want using the information you provided, or they may not exist. If we advise you that we have been unable to find the records despite a diligent search, you will nevertheless be provided the opportunity to appeal the adequacy of the Agency's search. However, if your request is for records that are obviously not connected with this Agency or your request has been provided to us in error, a “no records” response will not be considered an adverse action and you will not be provided an opportunity to appeal.
( d ) *Appeal of denials.* You have the right to appeal a partial or full denial of your FOIA request. To do so, you must put your appeal in writing and address it to the official identified in the denial letter. Your appeal letter must be dated and postmarked within 30 calendar days from the date of the Agency's denial letter. Because we have some discretionary authority in deciding whether to release or withhold records, you may strengthen your appeal by explaining your reasons for wanting the records. However, you are not required to give any explanation. Your appeal will be reviewed by the Agency's Access Appeal Committee that consists of senior Agency officials. When the Committee responds to your appeal, that constitutes the Agency's final action on the request. If the Access Appeal Committee grants your appeal in part or in full, we will send the records to you promptly or set up an appointment for you to inspect them. If the decision is to deny your appeal in part or in full, the final letter will state the reasons for the decision, name the officials responsible for the decision, and inform you of the FOIA provisions for judicial review.
### §5163. Limitation on use of sliding scales

No geographic area shall be precluded from receiving assistance under this chapter solely by virtue of an arithmetic formula or sliding scale based on income or population.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §320, as added Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §105(m)(1), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4696.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of this title and Tables.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------


             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                             TICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

PRO FORMA SHARES:                           1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                              <C>                <C> 
Shares to be outstanding after conversion        5,961,750          1 54,750 X $1 = $54,750
750 o/s shares X 7,949 conversion ratio                             $54,750 / $3.50 = 15,643
                                                                     54,750 - 15,643 = 39,107      
Thirty warrants of TES to be converted             238,470 
                  
Common Eq. Shares for options granted               39,107   1
 
Shares to be converted from debt                    88,560
                                                 ----------
                TOTAL SHARES                     6,327,887
                                                 ==========
</TABLE> 

HISTORICAL SHARES:                           06/30/97                  06/30/96
 
Shares outstanding (1)                          750                       750


(1) Common equivalent shares related to the thirty warrants outstanding are not
    included because their effect would be anti-dilutive.

 
NET INCOME (LOSS) APPLICABLE TO COMMON SHARES:
 
                                             06/30/97                  06/30/96
 
Net income (loss) per financial statements   ($13,637)                 ($98,633)
                                             =========                  ========
 
PRO FORMA EPS:        1997
                     $8,865  (3)
                     ------
                  6,327,887       $0.00
                                  =====

(3) Net income per financial statements plus the interest expensed on
    convertible debt of $22,502.
 
HISTORICAL EPS:    06/30/97                 06/30/96
                  ($13,637)                ($98,633)
                  ---------                ---------
                       750    ($18.18)          750      ($131.51)
                              ========                   =========
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2524 

To extend the suspension of duty on Bis(4-fluorophenyl) methanone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Bis(4-fluorophenyl) 

methanone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIS(4-FLUOROPHENYL) METHANONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bis(4-fluorophenyl) methanone) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2524 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 43 Filed 04/16/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document42 Filed04/15/10 Page1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 43 Filed 04/16/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document42 Filed04/15/10 Page2 of 3
Case3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document42 Filed04/15/10 Page3 of 3

April 16, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-03470-JSW Document 43 Filed 04/16/10 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Helen C. Fairbairn, Deceased. Ann C. Whittlesey, Individually, and as Executrix of Mary C. Lanigan, Deceased, Respondents-Appellants; Liberty National Bank and Trust Company, as Committee, Appellant-Respondent.

Motion to resettle remittitur order and for other relief granted. Ann C. Whittlesey as executrix of Mary C. Lanigan, deceased, substituted in place of Mary C. Lanigan, deceased.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 260

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify the requirements 

for a child born abroad and out of wedlock to acquire citizenship based 

on the citizenship of the child’s father, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify 

the requirements for a child born abroad and out of 

wedlock to acquire citizenship based on the citizenship 

of the child’s father, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Father’s Equity Act’’. 
2

•HR 260 IH 

1 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF CITIZENSHIP FOR CHILDREN 

2 BORN ABROAD AND OUT OF WEDLOCK TO A 

3 UNITED STATES CITIZEN FATHER. 

4 Section 309(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1409(a)) is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding ‘‘and’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) by striking paragraph (3); 

9 (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘while the 

10 person is under the age of 18 years—’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘at any time—’’; and 

12 (4) by redesignating paragraph (4) as para13 graph (3). 

14 SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION REGARDING DECEASED PARENTS 

15 OF CHILDREN BORN ABROAD AND OUT OF 

16 WEDLOCK. 

17 Section 309 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

18 (8 U.S.C. 1409) is amended by adding at the end the fol19 lowing: 

20 ‘‘(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to pre21 clude a person who is a citizen or national of the United 

22 States by virtue of a provision of this section from estab23 lishing such status under this title after the death of the 

24 person’s father, mother, or parents.’’. 
3

•HR 260 IH 

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to per3 sons born out of wedlock who are alive on or after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### § 1000.501 Who is involved in monitoring activities under NAHASDA?

The recipient, the grant beneficiary and HUD are involved in monitoring activities under NAHASDA.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
L. Hartzmark, interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:   May 16, 2005                            /s/ Michael L. Hartzmark
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Michael L. Hartzmark
                                                Interim Chief Financial Officer
### §300gg–136. Provision of information upon request and for scheduled appointments

Each health care provider and health care facility shall, beginning January 1, 2022, in the case of an individual who schedules an item or service to be furnished to such individual by such provider or facility at least 3 business days before the date such item or service is to be so furnished, not later than 1 business day after the date of such scheduling (or, in the case of such an item or service scheduled at least 10 business days before the date such item or service is to be so furnished (or if requested by the individual), not later than 3 business days after the date of such scheduling or such request)—

(1) inquire if such individual is enrolled in a group health plan, group or individual health insurance coverage offered by a health insurance issuer, or a Federal health care program (and if is so enrolled in such plan or coverage, seeking to have a claim for such item or service submitted to such plan or coverage); and

(2) provide a notification (in clear and understandable language) of the good faith estimate of the expected charges for furnishing such item or service (including any item or service that is reasonably expected to be provided in conjunction with such scheduled item or service and such an item or service reasonably expected to be so provided by another health care provider or health care facility), with the expected billing and diagnostic codes for any such item or service, to—

(A) in the case the individual is enrolled in such a plan or such coverage (and is seeking to have a claim for such item or service submitted to such plan or coverage), such plan or issuer of such coverage; and

(B) in the case the individual is not described in subparagraph (A) and not enrolled in a Federal health care program, the individual.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2799B–6, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title I, §112, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2866.)