alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1000.328 What is the minimum amount that an Indian tribe may receive under the need component of the formula? ( a ) Subject to the eligibility criteria described in paragraph (b) of this section, the minimum allocation in any fiscal year to an Indian tribe under the need component of the IHBG Formula shall equal 0.007826 percent of the available appropriations for that fiscal year after set asides.
( b ) To be eligible for the minimum allocation described in paragraph (a) of this section, an Indian tribe must: ( 1 ) Receive less than $200,000 under the FCAS component of the IHBG Formula for the fiscal year; and
( 2 ) Certify in its Indian Housing Plan the presence of any households at or below 80 percent of median income.
[72 FR 20025, Apr. 20, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 71527, Dec. 3, 2012]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 05-505 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CIVIL AVIATION 

Transport Services 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MALDIVES 

Signed at Washington May 5, 2005 

with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MALDIVES 

 Civil Aviation: Transport Services 

 Agreement signed at Washington May 5, 2005; 

 Entered into force May 5, 2005. 

 With annexes.
Case 3:08-cv-03707-CRB Document 14 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-03707-CRB Document 14 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.38


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into
by and between JOHN A. ORWIN (“Executive”) and Affymax, Inc.
(the “Company”),
effective as of September 23, 2010 (the “Effective Date”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company retains the services of Executive
pursuant to that certain Employment Agreement dated February 19, 2010 (the
“Employment Agreement”),
and the Company and Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth below;


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to continue to employ Executive
pursuant to the Employment Agreement, as herein amended;


 


WHEREAS, Executive wishes to continue to be employed by the
Company and provide personal services to the Company in return for certain
compensation and benefits under the Employment Agreement, as herein amended;
and


 


WHEREAS, Section 11.4 of the Employment Agreement
provides that it cannot be modified or amended except in a writing signed by an
officer of the Company.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants contained herein, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties
hereto as follows:


 


1.             Clause
(iv) of Section 5.6(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended by replacing the phrase “one (1) year” with the phrase “thirty-six
(36) months.”


 


2.             In
all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged by this
Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Amendment on the dates written below.


 


	
  JOHN A.
  ORWIN

  	
   

  	
  AFFYMAX, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  John A. Orwin

  	
   

  	
  By:
  

  	
  /s/
  Arlene M. Morris

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:
  10/4/10

  	
   

  	
  Its:
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:
  9-23-2010
#### Benjamin F. Raines, Respondent, v. Great Neck Projects, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Motion to stay all proceedings under the order appealed from denied, without costs, and without prejudice to any claim of privilege upon the examination before trial. Beldoek, Acting P. J., Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0166]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled  “Infant Feeding Practices Study II”  has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 1, 2004 (69 FR 58915), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under  44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0558.   The approval expires on December 31, 2007.   A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets*.                

Dated: December 17, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-28136 Filed 12-23-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         687,967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,683,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                   157,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,509,009
<PP&E>                                       5,069,311
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,151,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,810,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,363,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,620,145
<OTHER-SE>                                    (879,386)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,810,754
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,433,674
<CGS>                                        6,414,202
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,586,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,154,052)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (438,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (715,852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (715,852)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Submitting counsel are

directed to serve this 

order upon all other 

non-efiling parties 

in this action.

Case 3:08-cv-02454-SI Document 37 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 3
USDC

Note

Judge's signature

appeared in small

font...

Case 3:08-cv-02454-SI Document 37 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-02454-SI Document 37 Filed 06/17/10 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fleetclean Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned R. Greg Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Fleetclean Systems, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Dated: August 20, 2004

By:      /s/ R. Greg Smith
         -----------------
         R. Greg Smith
         Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(February 9, 1961)

#### Jane Friend, Doing Business under the Name of Dubonnet Music Publishing v. Paul Cunningham, as President of the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before February 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the April 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to dispense with the printing in the record on appeal of the exhibits enumerated in the moving papers herein on condition that the appellant, on or before March 22, 1961, serves upon the attorneys for the respondent one legible photo reproduction of each of the said exhibits and files with this court five legible photo reproductions of each thereof. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
### §4906. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–574, §7(a), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1239, related to a study by the Administrator of the adequacy of noise controls, noise emission standards, and measures available to control such noise, the results of such study to be reported to the appropriate committees of Congress within nine months after Oct. 27, 1972.
#### Angela Aragona et al., Respondents, v CIN-MAR Developers, Inc., Defendant, and Joseph Aragona, Jr., et al., Appellants.

[715 NYS2d 659]

—In a shareholders’ derivative action, *inter alia,*for an accounting and injunctive relief, the defendants Joseph Aragona, Jr., and Cynthia Aragona, a/k/a Cynthia Neuman, appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated July 6, 1999.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs payable to the respondents.

On a prior appeal, we reversed an order which held the appellants in civil contempt since the threshold question of whether the plaintiff Angela Aragona had standing to commence this action had not been determined *(see, Aragona v CIN-MAR Developers,*250 AD2d 792). On remittitur, after a hearing, the Supreme Court determined that Angela Aragona was a shareholder in CIN-MAR Developers, Inc., and that she therefore had standing to maintain this shareholders’ derivative action. A contempt order, however, was' not issued.

On this appeal, the appellants challenge the Supreme Court’s determination and request that this Court reverse and find that Angela Aragona does not have standing to sue. Findings of fact, however, are not independently appealable and consequently, the appeal must be dismissed *(see, Napolitano v Kaddoch,*275 AD2d 445; *Naar v Litwak & Co.,*260 AD2d 613). At this juncture, there is no existing contempt order from which an appeal has been taken. Moreover, no appeal lies from a decision *(see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp.,*100 AD2d 509). Sullivan, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Rawlins

"Pathfinder
voir
27
Reser
24
23
2
x
of
21, 5
20
19 8

18

17 Saratoga

|
|
| lé od
1
fl
316
wie
gio
|
|
94) 93. 92 91 90)
I Baggs
HE Crucial Winter Y/ZA Spring/Summer/Fall
(8) Crucial Year-Long ‘| Yearlong
Winter/Yearlong WK Parturition Areas

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

16

ment

boas=—n=

ee

34)
%
za .
t
ay
le
& [aS
Laramie
Cheyenne

75 | 73 72 2, 70 69 68 67. 66. 65, 64 63 62, REIW 6

1°) 10 20 40 60 80 100
Kilometers
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
Miles

Map 2-56
Elk Habitat
and Parturition Areas
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

VIRGINIA ROBERSON,

Defendant. /

No. CR 09-0523 WHA

NOTICE RE LETTER FROM

DEFENDANT ROBERSON

The Court is in receipt of the attached letter from defendant Roberson and requests the

guidance of counsel regarding how to respond to her request. Both sides should respond no

later than NOON ON JUNE 30, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 24, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cr-00523-WHA Document 124 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 1
S

-1-STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCOTT S. FURSTMAN, Cal. Bar No. 76476

LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT S. FURSTMAN

510 North Third Street

San Jose, California 95112

Telephone: 408-292-4132

Facsimile: 408-292-4162

sfurstman@sbcglobal.net

Attorneys for Defendants

SS PACIFIC STAR; INTERNATIONAL

DATA SECURITY, INC.; and INTERNATIONAL

MARITIME SECURITY ALLIANCE, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESCO MARINE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SS PACIFIC STAR, (ex-ARTSHIP, exGOLDEN BEAR), her engines, tackle,

equipment, appurtenances, freights, cargo, etc.

(Official Number 239932) in rem,

INTERNATIONAL DATA SECURITY,

INC., a Delaware corporate entity; and

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME SECURITY

ALLIANCE, LLC., a Delaware corporate

entity,

Defendants.

Case No. CV 08 05575 SI

STIPULATION TO VACATE PRE TRIAL

CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATE;

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties, through their respective undersigned counsel of record, stipulate that the Pre

Trial conference presently set for May 18, 2010 at 3:30 p.m. may be vacated. The parties further

stipulate that the trial presently set for June 1, 2010 may also be vacated. The matter will remain

set for further Case Management Conference on July 9, 2010 at 3:00 p.m.

This stipulation is entered into as Plaintiff has been granted leave to amend to name

individual Defendants, and has in fact filed an Amended Complaint.

Case 3:08-cv-05575-SI Document 58 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

It is so stipulated.

Dated: May 17, 2010____ LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT S. FURSTMAN

By /s/ Scott S. Furstman

SCOTT S. FURSTMAN

Attorney for Defendants SS PACIFIC STAR;

INTERNATIONAL DATA SECURITY, INC.;

and INTERNATIONAL MARITIME

SECURITY ALLIANCE

Dated: May 17 , 2010 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC

/s/ Norman J. Ronneberg, Jr.

By ___________________________________

NORMAN J. RONNEBERG, JR.

Attorneys for Plaintiff ESCO MARINE, INC.

[Proposed] Order

Good cause appearing and the parties having stipulated thereto, it is ordered that the Pre

Trial Conference presently set for May 18, 2010 is vacated. It is further ordered that the Trial date

presently set for June 1, 2010 is also vacated. The matter remains set for further Case Management

Conference on July 9, 2010 at 3:00 p.m.

Dated: May , 2010

_________________________________

Susan Illston, U. S. District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05575-SI Document 58 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 229.505 Employment criteria. A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for any employment opportunity that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless: ( a ) Use of such test or other criterion is shown to predict validly successful performance in the position in question; and
( b ) Alternative tests or criteria for such purpose, which do not have such disproportionately adverse effect, are shown to be unavailable.
#### In the Matter of Lubitz Bros., Inc., Appellant, v. State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, and appeal dismissed. Nolan, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER C. TALLEY,

Plaintiff,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social

Security Administration,

Defendant. /

No. C 08-4529 SI

JUDGMENT

This action has been remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings.

 Judgment is entered accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Dated: March 24, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04529-SI Document 36 Filed 03/24/10 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:08-cv-04134-MMC Document 38 Filed 02/04/10 Page 1 of 2
February 4, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04134-MMC Document 38 Filed 02/04/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 1000.28 May a self-governance Indian tribe be exempted from the applicability of § 1000.26?

Yes. A self-governance Indian tribe shall certify that its administrative requirements, standards and systems meet or exceed the comparable requirements of § 1000.26. For purposes of this section, a self-governance Indian tribe is an Indian tribe that participates in tribal self-governance as authorized under Public Law 93-638, as amended (25 U.S.C. 450 *et seq.*).
exv10w1






EXHIBIT 10.1



August 23, 2010




Travelport, LP

Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.

300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.

Atlanta, GA 30339





	Re:  	 	Eighth Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007 (“Agreement”)
between Travelport, LP (f/k/a Travelport International, L.L.C., hereinafter “Travelport”),
Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (f/k/a Galileo Nederland B.V., hereinafter “TGDS”
and, together with Travelport, collectively, “Galileo”) and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC
(“Subscriber”)




Ladies and Gentlemen:



This letter constitutes an Eighth Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Agreement referenced above.
Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall be used as defined in the
Agreement.



Effective as August 17, 2010, (“Amendment Effective Date”), Galileo and Subscriber hereby agree as
follows:



1. Custom Terms and Conditions Revision. The Custom Terms and Conditions Attachment
(Galileo Services) — North America to the Agreement is amended as set forth in Exhibit A.



2. General. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as expressly provided in
the Agreement. Each Party to this Amendment agrees that, other than as expressly set out in this
Amendment, nothing in this Amendment is intended to alter the rights, duties and obligations of the
Parties under the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby. In the
event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions
of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern. This Amendment may be
executed by the Parties in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall be deemed to be an
original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







1









 







The Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by the signatures of their respective
authorized representatives.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	Orbitz Worldwide, LLC	 	 	 	Travelport, LP

By: Travelport Holdings LLC as
General Partner	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signature:	 	/s/ Ronnie Gurion	 	 	 	Signature:	 	/s/ Scott Hyden	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Ronnie Gurion
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Scott Hyden	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President, Orbitz Distribution
	 	 	 	 	 	Title:
	 	VP, Sales	 	 
	Date: 8/27/10	 	 	 	Date: 8/30/10	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Signature:	 	/s/ Marco van Ieperen	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Marco van Ieperen	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:
	 	Director	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Date: 8/30/10	 	 






2
### §7276f. Western Area Power Administration; deposit and availability of discretionary offsetting collections

Notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, section 825s of title 16, and section 392a of title 43, funds collected by the Western Area Power Administration from the sale of power and related services that are applicable to the repayment of the annual expenses of this account in this and subsequent fiscal years shall be credited to this account as discretionary offsetting collections for the sole purpose of funding such expenses, with such funds remaining available until expended: Provided further, That for purposes of this appropriation, annual expenses means expenditures that are generally recovered in the same year that they are incurred (excluding purchase power and wheeling expenses).

(Pub. L. 111–85, title III, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2870.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

"This account" and "this appropriation", referred to in text, mean funds appropriated under the heading "Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration" of title III of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, Pub. L. 111–85.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, and not as part of the Department of Energy Organization Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Purchase Power and Wheeling Expenses

Pub. L. 113–76, div. D, title III, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 171, provided: "That for purposes of this appropriation in this [Act] [div. D of Pub. L. 113–76, see Tables for classification] and subsequent Acts, purchase power and wheeling expenses includes the cost of voluntary purchases of power allowances in compliance with state greenhouse gas programs existing at the time of enactment of this Act [Jan. 17, 2014]."