alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of William F. Mackey, Jr., an Attorney, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Second Department,

February 14, 1978

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Robert Roberto, Jr. (Louis J. Profera*of counsel), for petitioner.

*263
      *Thomas A. Cassidy*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 4, 1956 under the name William Francis Mackey, Jr. By order of this court dated August 1, 1977, following a prior disciplinary proceeding, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years. By a further order of this court dated August 31, 1977, the suspension was made effective as of October 1, 1977.

In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report and the respondent cross-moves to dis-affirm that report and for a new hearing or, in the alternative, the imposition of no more than a censure in the event that the report is confirmed.

The reporting Justice sustained four charges of professional misconduct against respondent as follows: (1) failing to promptly pay or deliver escrow funds in the amount of $2,500; (2) failing to promptly pay or deliver escrow funds in the amount of $1,500; (3) neglecting to handle a legal matter entrusted to him and failing to promptly pay or deliver escrow funds in excess of $2,000; and (4) failing to compensate the estate of an attorney for legal services rendered to the respondent by the deceased attorney.

After reviewing all of the evidence, we are in full agreement with the findings of the Referee. Therefore, petitioner’s motion to confirm the Referee’s report is granted and respondent’s cross motion is denied in its entirety.

The respondent is adjudged guilty of serious professional misconduct and should be, and he hereby is, disbarred from further practice of law, and his name is ordered removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith.

Mollen, P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the first quarter financial statements of Tice Technology, Inc. and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         35,457
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 217,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                   391,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              660,054 
<PP&E>                                        785,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                605,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,138,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         660,980
<BONDS>                                       610,320
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       80,192
<OTHER-SE>                                  (212,585)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,138,907
<SALES>                                       182,308 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              229,764
<CGS>                                         119,632         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 302,231 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (91,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    4,745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (96,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 (96,367)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.54 Order of consideration. ( a ) *General.* Consular officers shall request applicants to take the steps necessary to meet the requirements of INA 222(b) in order to apply formally for a visa as follows: ( 1 ) In the chronological order of the priority dates of all applicants within each of the immigrant classifications specified in INA 203 (a) and (b); and
( 2 ) In the random order established by the Secretary of State for each region for the fiscal year for applicants entitled to status under INA 203(c).
( b ) [Reserved]
[56 FR 51174, Oct. 10, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 15302, Mar. 31, 1994; 61 FR 1836, Jan. 24, 1996; 63 FR 48578, Sept. 11, 1998]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          51,517
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                60,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,642,849
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      3,698,496
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,587,359
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,167,140
<SHORT-TERM>                                   248,241
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            210,248
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,191,169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           792
<OTHER-SE>                                     769,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,587,359
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                134,672
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              122,014
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,026
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               257,712
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              88,184
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             154,518
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          103,194
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,399
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                133,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,661)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (30,188)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,236)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (34,424)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.93
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,569
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,037
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 10,082
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                40,207
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                        83
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,270
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         40,270


</TABLE>
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2590 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain filament yarns. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

filament yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FILAMENT YARNS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain filament yarns) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2590 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
§ 214.41 Support services. ( a ) A.I.D. provides support services for advisory committees which are established by or report to the Agency, unless the establishing authority provides otherwise.
( b ) Within A.I.D., support services are provided by and charged to the allotment of the A.I.D. office or bureau through which the advisory committee reports, and are coordinated by the designated A.I.D. Advisory Committee Representative.
( c ) Support services include staff, quarters, supplies, and funds.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1560-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1560-DR), dated September 24, 2004, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

November 1, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Jesse F. Munoz, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster. 

This action terminates my appointment of James N. Russo as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program—Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.) 

Michael D. Brown, 

Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security. 

[FR Doc. 04-26702 Filed 12-3-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
§ 72.15 Action when possession is impractical. ( a ) A consular officer should not take physical possession of the personal estate of a deceased United States citizen or non-citizen national in his or her consular district when the consular officer determines in his or her discretion that it would be impractical to do so.
( b ) In such cases, the consular officer must take action that he or she determines in his or her discretion would be appropriate to protect t the personal estate such as: ( 1 ) Requesting the persons, officials or organizations having custody of the personal estate to ship the property to the consular officer, if the personal estate contains sufficient funds to cover the costs of such shipment; or
( 2 ) Requesting local authorities to safeguard the property until a legal representative can take physical possession.
### §5504a. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–125, title VIII, §804(b), Nov. 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 948

Section, Pub. L. 95–356, title VIII, §804, Sept. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 585, related to use of solar energy systems in military construction projects.
From: Rahul Pendse <RPendse@trinityconsultants.com>

Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:25 PM

To: Land, Eva

Cc: Carlson, Sara

Subject: Anadarko BlackHawk EGOM PSD/Title V permit application

- Revised

Sections

Attachments: Revised BlackHawk Appendix B Revision 1.pdf; Revised BlackHornet

Appendix D Pages Revision 1.pdf; Revised

- BlackHawk PSD and Title V

Permit Application Revision 1.pdf

Hello Eva,

Per our phone discussion, attached are revised sections for BlackHawk EGOM PSD/Title V permit

application received by EPA on September 5, 2013. I have highlighted the key revisions. The key

revisions include:

1. Drillship main engines long term NOx PTE (note no impact short term PTE [i.e., lbs/hr and

lbs/day])

2. Support vessel fuel b ased emission factor

3. Added more clarification to fuel based emission factor derivation (see pages 187 to 192 in

Revised Appendix B)

To ensure consistency, I have made a few other administrative changes in the attached documents.

Please note that none of these revisions have impact on submitted air dispersion modeling analysis.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need clarification. I will provide a similar email for

BlackHornet PSD/Title V permit application.

Thanks for your help!

........................... ..................................................................................... Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
#### Caree Sales, Ltd., Division of Irman Trading, Inc., Appellant, v After Six, Inc., Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 3, 1977, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Evans, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ.
#### Ephraim Bennis et al., Respondents, v. Albert C. Thomas et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion by appellants to stay execution of judgment of foreclosure and sale, pending appeal, denied. Motion by appellants to appeal as poor persons and for an extension of time to perfect appeal, granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers (including the typed minutes) and on appellants’ typewritten brief. Appellants are directed to file six copies of their typewritten brief and to serve one copy on respondents. Appellants’ time to perfect the appeal is extended to the March Term, beginning February 27, 1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Antonio Mareno, Esq., having consented to serve without compensation, is hereby assigned as counsel for appellants to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### William T. Kirscher, Appellant, v. Louise P. Kirscher, Respondent.

. Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs to either party. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE

STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF KFD ENTERPRISE, INC.’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4849-08 70-70 77.1 -1-

GLENN A. FRIEDMAN, SB# 104442

ROBERT W. FARRELL, SB# 107461

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

One Sansome Street, Suite 1400

San Francisco, California 94104

Telephone: (415) 362-2580

Facsimile: (415) 434-0882

E-mail: friedman@lbbslaw.com

 farrell@lbbslaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC., a California

corporation dba Norman’s Dry Cleaner,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF EUREKA, et al.,

Defendants.

AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND

THIRD PARTY CLAIMS.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF

DEFENDANT ECO DRY OF AMERICA,

INC.’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE

STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF KFD

ENTERPRISES, INC.’S SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Hearing Date: March 12, 2010

Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m.

Courtroom: 7

Judge: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendant Eco Dry of America, Inc. (“Eco Dry”) hereby

withdraws its Motion For a More Definite Statement of Plaintiff KFD Enterprises, Inc.’s Second

Amended Complaint currently scheduled for hearing on March 12, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in the above

captioned action.

///

///

///

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 188 Filed 02/25/10 Page 1 of 2
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.’S MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE

STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF KFD ENTERPRISE, INC.’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4849-08 70-70 77.1 -2-

DATED: February 24, 2010 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By /s/ Robert W. Farrell 

GLENN A. FRIEDMAN, ESQ.

 ROBERT W. FARRELL, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant 

ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February ___, 2010 By _______________________________

 JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

 DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 188 Filed 02/25/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.3











Exhibit 10.3




August 31, 2010




Personal and Confidential




Ms. Laurie F. Gilner

1548 Highland Valley Circle

Chesterfield, MO 63005




Dear Laurie:



The purpose of this letter agreement is to amend Section 1 of your offer letter, dated July
26, 2010 (the “Offer Letter”), to reflect our mutual understanding and agreement that your
employment with C.R. Gibson, LLC (“CRG”) will commence on September 2, 2010, rather than on
September 7, 2010 as set forth in the Offer Letter. Accordingly, we agree that effective
immediately Section 1 of the Offer Letter shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:




1. Contract Term – The term of your employment will commence September 2, 2010 and
will end September 6, 2013, unless terminated earlier by you or by CRG at any time as
provided herein. Thereafter, your employment status with CRG will continue to be that of an
employee at-will, subject to termination by either you or CRG at any time.



In all other respects, the Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect according to its
terms and conditions.



Please confirm your understanding of the foregoing provisions by executing the enclosed
counterpart of this letter and returning the executed counterpart to me.



Sincerely yours,




Christopher J. Munyan

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

C.R. Gibson, LLC




The aforementioned is confirmed as of this 31th day of August, 2010:



	 	 	 
	 

Laurie F. Gilner

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	cc:   William G. Kiesling
	 	 






402 BNA Dr. Building 100, Suite 600, Nashville, TN 37217 / 615-724-2800
§ 501.9 Interchange of FSOs between Broadcasting Board of Governors and other Foreign Affairs Agencies. Foreign Service Officers (FSOs) desiring transfer from one agency to another may apply under the following provisions: ( a ) *Applications.* Applications for interchange appointments should be sent to the Board of Examiners for the Foreign Service, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520.
( b ) *Certification and approval.* ( 1 ) When a Foreign Service Officer of another Foreign Affairs Agency wishes to transfer to the Broadcasting Board of Governors, a certification of need is required from the Director, Office of Personnel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, and approval is required by the Director of Personnel for the other agency for the officer's release to Broadcasting Board of Governors.
( 2 ) When a Broadcasting Board of Governors FSO wishes to transfer to another Foreign Affairs Agency, a certification of need is required from the Director of Personnel of the other Agency, and approval is required by the Director, Office of Personnel, Broadcasting Board of Governors, for the officer's release to that Agency.
( 3 ) A review by the Board of Examiners for the Foreign Service will certify the eligibility of candidates for exchange. BEX will notify the Office of Personnel, Broadcasting Board of Governors when a Foreign Service Officer of another Agency has been approved for transfer and Broadcasting Board of Governors will process the necessary employment papers.
( 4 ) A new FSO appointment for officers transferring between another Foreign Affairs Agency and Broadcasting Board of Governors is not required.