alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2632 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,3′-Dichlorobenzidine Dihydrochloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2005 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3,3′-Dichlorobenzidine 

Dihydrochloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3,3′-DICHLOROBENZIDINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.09.50 3,3′-Dichlorobenzidine 

Dihydrochloride (CAS No. 

612–83–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2921.59.80) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2632 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### § 911.1 Definition.

An implementation dispute is any dispute between the agency and the exclusive representative, as provided in regulations adopted as a result of collective bargaining between the agencies and the employee representatives. Such a dispute, also referred to as an institutional dispute, is one which directly concerns the rights and obligations of an agency and an exclusive representative toward each other or the rights or obligations between an agency and one or more employees as set forth in a collective bargaining agreement.
### §6372g. Allocation of grants

(a) Grants made under this part shall be allocated among the States in accordance with a formula to be prescribed, by rule, by the Secretary, taking into account population and climate of each State, and such other factors as the Secretary may deem appropriate.

(b) The total amount allocated to any State under subsection (a) in any year shall not exceed 10 percent of the total amount allocated to all the States in such year under such subsection (a). Except for the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and the Virgin Islands, not less than 0.5 percent of such total allocation to all States for that year shall be allocated in such year for the total of grants in each State which has an approved State plan under this part.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §400H, as added Pub. L. 95–619, title III, §311(a), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3253.)
Power of Attorney


Know all by these presents, that the undersigned (the "Reporting Person")
hereby constitutes and appoints each of Melanie A. DeMorrow, Assistant Vice
President-Shareholder Relations; Richard M. Lavers, Secretary; Joseph P.
Tomczak, Executive Vice President & C.F.O.; Ellen C. Padesky, Assistant
Secretary; and Jessica L. Long, Assistant Secretary,  signing singly, as the
Reporting Person's true and lawful attorney-in-fact, to:

(1) execute for and on behalf of the Reporting Person, in the Reporting
Person's capacity as an officer or trustee of Coachmen Industries, Inc.
(the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 and such other similar forms as may be
required for filing in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules
thereunder;

(2) do and perform all acts for and on behalf of the Reporting Person
which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such forms
and timely file such forms with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority or other federal
agency; and

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit
to, and in the best interest of, or legally required by, the Reporting
Person.

The Reporting Person hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,
necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers
herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the Reporting Person
might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or
revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or
such attorney-in-facts substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to
be done by the virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights and powers
herein granted.  The Reporting Person acknowledges that the foregoing
attorneys-in fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the Reporting
Person, are not assuming, nor is the company assuming, any of the Reporting
Persons responsibilities to comply with any of the above specified laws or
regulations.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the
Reporting Person is no longer required to file such forms with respect to the
Reporting Person's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the
Company, unless earlier revoked by the Reporting Person in a signed writing
delivered to the Secretary of  the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Reporting Person has caused this Power of Attorney to
be executed as of this 10th day of July, 2003.



						s/Steven E. Kerr
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Brian Fontana, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 21, 2006 By /s/ BRIAN FONTANA             Brian Fontana, Vice President      and Chief Financial Officer  
34
Exhibit 10.11


 


Power of Attorney


 


I, the undersigned, TAO
Hongbing, a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”),
being a shareholder holding 2.42% equity interest of Beijing Syswin Xing Ye
Real Estate Brokerage Company Limited(“Syswin
Xing Ye”), hereby irrevocably authorizes Beijing Syswin Zhi Di
Technology Limited (“Syswin Zhi Di”)
to exercise the following powers and rights during the term of this Power of
Attorney.


 


I,
the undersigned, exclusively authorize Syswin Zhi Di as the sole and exclusive
attorney-in-fact, to exercise on my behalf the following shareholder’s rights
in respect of my equity interest, including but not limited to: (i) the
right to attend  shareholder’s meeting
and to execute relative Shareholder Resolution(s) of Syswin Xing Ye for
and on my behalf; (ii) all shareholder’s rights prescribed by laws and
regulations and articles of association of Syswin Xing Ye, including but not
limited to voting rights, rights to sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose
of all or part of my equity interests; and (iii) acting as my
representative to designate and appoint the legal representative, chairman,
directors, supervisors, general managers and other senior officers of Syswin
Xing Ye.


 


Syswin
Zhi Di is authorized to execute the Equity Transfer Agreements contemplated in
the Exclusive Purchase Option Agreement (to which I am one party) on my behalf
within the scope of authorization, to timely perform the Equity Pledge
Agreement and Exclusive Purchase Option Agreement, to each of which I am one
party, executed on the same date as this Power of Attorney. The exercise of the
aforesaid rights does not constitute any restriction to the authorization under
this Power of Attorney.


 


Save
as otherwise provided herein, Syswin Zhi Di is entitled to exercise all the
necessary rights in respect of my equity interest upon its own discretions
without any oral or written instructions from me.


 


All
acts of Syswin Zhi Di in respect of my equity interests shall be deemed as my
own acts and all documents executed by Syswin Zhi Di shall be deemed as
executed by myself with my acknowledgement.


 


Syswin
Zhi Di has the right to assign all rights under this Power of Attorney and to
authorize other individuals or legal entities to execute the above rights in
respect of my equity interest without prior notice or consent from me. Syswin
Zhi Di is obligated to inform me such assignments on a timely basis and should
not harm my interest in any event.


 


This
Power of Attorney is irrevocable and continuously valid during the term of 


 


1

















 


which
I am a shareholder of Syswin Xing Ye (the “Effective
Period”) and shall come into effect as of the date set forth below.


 


During
the Effective Period, I shall negotiate with Syswin Zhi Di in the event
that I intend to exercise any right in respect of my equity interest that has
been authorized to Syswin Zhi Di herein.


 


 


	
  TAO Hongbing

  
	
   

  
	
  (Signature)

  	
  /s/ Hongbing Tao

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Date: August 4, 2010

  



 


2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,034
<SECURITIES>                                   377,260
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,285
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               791,152
<PP&E>                                       1,374,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                 731,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,692,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          380,311
<BONDS>                                        317,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,309
<OTHER-SE>                                     809,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,692,521
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               554,099
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  393,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,724
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             71,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    71,788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
        

</TABLE>
(_] $28,500 - $33,000
[==] $33,500 - $37,000
(1) $39,000 - $41,000
{BB $44,000 - $55,000

U.S. = $41,994
Wyoming = $37,892

Source: US Census Bureau, 2000

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM

0 20 40 80 120 160 200
Ea

Kilometers
0 10 20 40 60 80 100
a
Miles
Map 3-9

Median Household Income
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-16705; Airspace Docket No. 03-AGL-20]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects an error contained in a final rule that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, August 24, 2004 (69 FR 51943). The final rule modified Class D airspace at Mount Clemens, MI.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

0901 UTC, November 25, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

J. Mark Reeves, Central Service Office, Airspace Branch, AGL-520, Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018, telephone: (847) 294-7477.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History

**Federal Register**                     document 04-19376 published on Tuesday, August 24, 2004 (69 FR 51943), modified Class D airspace at Mount Clemens, MI. The coordinates for the Selfridge TACAN were left out of the legal description. This action corrects this error.                

                        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the error for the Class D airspace, Mount Clemens, MI, as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         Tuesday, August 24, 2004, (69 FR 51943), (FR Doc. 04-19376), is corrected as follows:                    

# PART 71—[AMENDED]

§ 71.1 

On page 51943, Column 3, in the heading of the legal description after “(Lat. 42°36′03″ N., long. 82°50′14″ W.)” add:

####                         “                        **Selfridge TACAN**

(Lat. 42°36′46″ N., long. 82°49′54″ W.)”

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on November 16, 2004. 

Nancy B. Kort, 

Area Director, Central Terminal Operations.

[FR Doc. 04-27092  Filed 12-9-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
APPENDIX I: GEORGETOWN WATERFRONT PARK PLAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Georgetown University Boathouse 

Environmental Assessment 

April 2006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David PP, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David *664PP, Appellant.

Appeals from separate judgments of the County Court of Chemung County, rendered February 20, 1976 and February 27, 1976, respectively, which adjudicated the appellant a youthful offender. In connection with each of the adjudications in question defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of four years’ imprisonment, the sentences to run concurrently. The sentences are challenged on appeal as being harsh and excessive, but there is no showing of any abuse of discretion by the sentencing court. Judgments affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Mahoney, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Janus Hotels and Resorts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Tonges, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Richard A. Tonges
---------------------------
Richard A. Tonges
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
### §17143. Government efficiency status reports

#### (a) In general

Each Federal agency subject to any of the requirements of this title 1 or the amendments made by this title 1 shall compile and submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget an annual Government efficiency status report on—

(1) compliance by the agency with each of the requirements of this title 1 and the amendments made by this title; 1

(2) the status of the implementation by the agency of initiatives to improve energy efficiency, reduce energy costs, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases; and

(3) savings to the taxpayers of the United States resulting from mandated improvements under this title 1 and the amendments made by this title.1

#### (b) Submission

The report shall be submitted—

(1) to the Director at such time as the Director requires;

(2) in electronic, not paper, format; and

(3) consistent with related reporting requirements.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title V, §527, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1663.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in subsec. (a), is title V of Pub. L. 110–140, which enacted this subchapter, part D (§8279) of subchapter III of chapter 91 of this title, and sections 1824, 2162a, and 2169 of Title 2, The Congress, amended sections 6325, 6834, 8256, 8258, 8259b, 8287, and 8287c of this title, section 2162 of Title 2, section 2913 of Title 10, Armed Forces, section 3203 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and section 2621 of Title 16, Conservation, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 8259b of this title. For complete classification of title V to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.

1 See References in Text note below.
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID BRYAN HART,

Petitioner,

    v.

B. CURRY, warden,

Respondent.                                                                           /

No. C 08-01498 MHP

JUDGMENT

This action having come before this court, the Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel, United States

District Judge presiding, and the issues having been duly presented and an order having been duly

filed granting defendants’ motion to dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that petitioner David Bryan Hart’s petition for a writ of

habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2254, is GRANTED.  Respondent is ordered to release

petitioner within thirty (30) days on such terms and conditions as may be set by the California Board

of Parole Hearings.  The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to

credit the period of time from January 10, 2007, the date of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s

reversal of the Board of Parole Hearing’s grant of parole, to the date of petitioner’s release toward

petitioner’s parole term. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 5, 2010                                                               MARILYN HALL PATELUnited States District Court JudgeNorthern District of California

Case 3:08-cv-01498-MHP   Document 15   Filed 08/05/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T07:27:20-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
#### Richard Simonds et al., Respondents, v Ellen Grobman et al., Appellants.

[716 NYS2d 692]

—In an action to recover dam*370ages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Colar, J.), dated November 22, 1999, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to strike the affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) on the ground that they had not been properly served with process pursuant to CPLR 308 (2). The process server’s affidavits constituted prima facie evidence of proper service pursuant to CPLR 308 (2) (see, *Wieck v Halpern,*255 AD2d 438; *Simmons First Natl. Bank v Mandracchia,*248 AD2d 375; *Remington Invs. v Seiden,*240 AD2d 647). The defendants failed to submit a sworn denial of service. Moreover, they did not swear to specific facts to rebut the statements in the process server’s affidavits (see, *Walkes v Benoit,*257 AD2d 508; *European Am. Bank v Abramoff,*201 AD2d 611). The affidavit of nonparty Frank Grobman was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact, and the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to strike the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction without a hearing. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.