alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1008.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
### §2991e. Announcement of research, demonstration, or pilot projects

(a) The Commissioner shall make a public announcement concerning—

(1) the title, purpose, intended completion date, identity of the grantee or contractor, and proposed cost of any grant or contract with a private or non-Federal public agency for a research, demonstration, or pilot project; and

(2) except in cases in which the Commissioner determines that it would not be consistent with the purposes of this subchapter, the results, findings, data, or recommendations made or reported as a result of such activities.

(b) The public announcements required by subsection (a) shall be made within thirty days of making such grants or contracts, and the public announcements required by subsection (b) of this section shall be made within thirty days of the receipt of such results.

(Pub. L. 88–452, title VIII, §807, formerly §806, as added Pub. L. 93–644, §11, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2325; renumbered §807, Pub. L. 100–175, title V, §502(3), Nov. 29, 1987, 101 Stat. 973; amended Pub. L. 102–375, title VIII, §822(7), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1298.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 807 of Pub. L. 88–452 was renumbered section 808 and is classified to section 2991f of this title.

A prior section 2991e, Pub. L. 88–452, title VIII, §806, as added Pub. L. 89–794, title VIII, §801, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1474, provided for duration of the VISTA program through June 30, 1970, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §110, Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 722.

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–375 substituted "Commissioner" for "Secretary" in two places.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

GERRY D. WILLIAMS, No. C 08-3907 SI (NJV) (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING TELEPHONIC

APPEARANCE FOR

v. FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

R. METCALFE, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff, GERRY D. WILLIAMS, CDCR No. D-77087, a necessary party

in proceedings in this case who is confined at Pleasant Valley State Prison in the custody of Warden

James A. Yates, appear by telephone for a further telephonic settlement conference to be held on August

17, 2010 at 10:30 a.m. in the United States District Court, Courtroom E, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California. The Court orders the Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison and the California

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to provide telephone access to inmate GERRY D.

WILLIAMS, CDCR No. D-77087, for these telephonic proceedings. The custodian shall make a

telephone available for inmate WILLIAMS to call the Court at the designated time by dialing 415-522-

3694. Deputy Attorney General Kenneth T. Roost shall appear for Defendants. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 16, 2010 ________________________________

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:08-cv-03907-SI Document 56 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUREKA DIVISION

GERRY D. WILLIAMS, No. C 08-3907 SI (NJV) (PR)

Plaintiff,

v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

R. METCALFE, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District

Court, Northern District of California, and that on August 16, 2010 I SERVED a true and correct copy

of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) listed below,

by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail.

Gerry D. Williams

D-77087 

Pleasant Valley State Prison 

P.O. Box 8501 

Coalinga, CA 93210 

RICHARD W. WIEKING, CLERK

By:/s/___Gloria Masterson___________________

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:08-cv-03907-SI Document 56 Filed 08/16/10 Page 2 of 2
14. 4-Digit Facility Identification Code: 

SIC Code: 4911 SIC Description: Electric Services -=~~~-------------------------------

NAICS Code: 221119 

---------- NAICS Description: Other Electric Power Generation 

15. Description of general production process and operation for which a permit is being requested. If 

necessary, attach additional sheets to give an adequate description. Include layout drawings, as necessary, 

to describe each process. References should be made to source codes used in the application. 

Currently, Plant Yates includes seven steam-electric generating units that are primarily coal-fired. Natural gas 

burners and ignitors will be installed on Yates Units 6 and 7 to allow Units 6 and 7 to operate at full capacity on 100% 

natural gas. A new natural gas-fired water bath gas heater will be installed at the existing pressure and flow 

conditioning station on-site, functionally replacing a smaller, existing natural gas heater currently located at an off-site 

metering station. An existing on-site 72,000-gallon fuel oil tank currently supplies fuel to the existing emergency 

generators and compressor for Units 6 and 7 as well as to Units 6 and 7 for support fuel. This 72,000-gallon tank will 

be emptied and retired and a new 5,000 gallon fuel oil tank that will supply the existing emergency generators and 

compressor only will be installed at a different location. Contemporaneous with the natural gas projects at Units 6 

and 7, Units 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 at Plant Yates and two 38,000-gallon fuel oil tanks serving Units 1-5 will be retired. 

16. Additional information provided in attachments as listed below: 

Attachment A - See the accompanying permit application narrative and proposed permit revisions 

Attachment B -

Attachment C -

Attachment D -

Attachment E -

Attachment F -

17. Additional Information: Unless previously submitted, include the following two items: 

12J Plot plan/map of facility location or date of previous submittal: Included in Required Documents Section of the 

accompanying Title V application 

12J Flow Diagram or date of previous submittal: Included in Required Documents Section of the accompanying 

Title V application 

18. Other Environmental Permitting Needs: 

Will this facility/modification trigger the need for environmental permits/approvals (other than air) such as Hazardous 

Waste Generation, Solid Waste Handling, Water withdrawal, water discharge, SWPPP, mining, landfill, etc.? 

12J No DYes, please list below: 

Georgia SIP Application Form 1 .00, rev. October 2012 Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4296 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4296

To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act to repeal a duplicative 
         program relating to inspection and grading of catfish.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2012

 Mrs. Hartzler (for herself, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Frank of 
  Massachusetts, Ms. Roybal-Allard, and Mr. Cravaack) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act to repeal a duplicative 
         program relating to inspection and grading of catfish.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF DUPLICATIVE CATFISH INSPECTION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Effective on the date of the enactment of the 
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.), 
section 11016 of such Act (Public Law 110-246; 122 Stat. 2130) and the 
amendments made by such section are repealed.
    (b) Application.--The Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 
1621 et seq.) and the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.) shall be applied and administered as if section 11016 (Public Law 
110-246; 122 Stat. 2130) of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 
2008 (7 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.) and the amendments made by such section 
had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
### §6632. Membership of Committee

#### (a) Composition; appointment

The Committee shall consist of—

(1) the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy established under subchapter II of this chapter; and

(2) not less than eight nor more than fourteen other members appointed by the President not more than sixty days after the Director has assumed office (as provided in section 6612 of this title).

#### (b) Qualifications

Members of the Committee appointed by the President pursuant to subsection (a)(2) of this section shall—

(1) be qualified and distinguished in one or more of the following areas: science, engineering, technology, information dissemination, education, management, labor, or public affairs;

(2) be capable of critically assessing the policies, priorities, programs, and activities of the Nation, with respect to the findings, policies, and purposes set forth in subchapter I; and

(3) shall collectively constitute a balanced composition with respect to (A) fields of science and engineering, (B) academic, industrial, and government experience, and (C) business, labor, consumer, and public interest points of view.

#### (c) Chairman; Vice Chairman

The President shall appoint one member of the Committee to serve as Chairman and another member to serve as Vice Chairman for such periods as the President may determine.

#### (d) Compensation

Each member of the Committee who is not an officer of the Federal Government shall, while serving on business of the Committee, be entitled to receive compensation at a rate not to exceed the daily rate prescribed for GS–18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, including traveltime, and while so serving away from his home or regular place of business he may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same manner as the expenses authorized by section 5703(b) 1 of title 5 for persons in Government service employed intermittently.

(Pub. L. 94–282, title III, §302, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 468.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 5703 of title 5, referred to in subsec. (d), was amended generally by Pub. L. 94–22, §4, May 19, 1975, 89 Stat. 95, and, as so amended, does not contain a subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Abolition of President's Committee on Science and Technology; Transfer of Functions

See note set out under section 6631 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       24,089,769
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      38,194,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,044,951
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  49,899
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,502,706
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            479,870
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                 38,105
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    37,505,433
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                        3,810,535
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        3,810,535
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      256,175
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      1,506,459
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (180,133)
<NET-ASSETS>                                54,022,836
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                            1,798,589
<INTEREST-INCOME>                                    0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               1,542,414
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        256,175
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     1,506,459
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    (180,133)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        1,582,501
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                          0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        1,157,586
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              1,542,414
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        53,231,586
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            13.76
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                    .07
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                            .35
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              14.18
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   .039


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 240
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

§ 240.21F-14 Procedures applicable to the payment of awards. ( a ) Any award made pursuant to these rules will be paid from the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Protection Fund (the “Fund”).
( b ) A recipient of a whistleblower award is entitled to payment on the award only to the extent that a monetary sanction is collected in the Commission action or in a related action upon which the award is based.
( c ) Payment of a whistleblower award for a monetary sanction collected in a Commission action or related action shall be made following the later of: ( 1 ) The date on which the monetary sanction is collected; or
( 2 ) The completion of the appeals process for all whistleblower award claims arising from: ( i ) The Notice of Covered Action, in the case of any payment of an award for a monetary sanction collected in a Commission action; or
( ii ) The related action, in the case of any payment of an award for a monetary sanction collected in a related action.
( d ) If there are insufficient amounts available in the Fund to pay the entire amount of an award payment within a reasonable period of time from the time for payment specified by paragraph (c) of this section, then subject to the following terms, the balance of the payment shall be paid when amounts become available in the Fund, as follows: ( 1 ) Where multiple whistleblowers are owed payments from the Fund based on awards that do not arise from the same Notice of Covered Action (or related action), priority in making these payments will be determined based upon the date that the collections for which the whistleblowers are owed payments occurred. If two or more of these collections occur on the same date, those whistleblowers owed payments based on these collections will be paid on a pro rata basis until sufficient amounts become available in the Fund to pay their entire payments.
( 2 ) Where multiple whistleblowers are owed payments from the Fund based on awards that arise from the same Notice of Covered Action (or related action), they will share the same payment priority and will be paid on a pro rata basis until sufficient amounts become available in the Fund to pay their entire payments.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the “Company”),on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Frank M. Semple, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ FRANK M. SEMPLE |   |
|---------------------|--------|

 

Frank M. Semple

Chief Executive Officer

 

January 10,2006

 

----
### §5714b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5714b was editorially reclassified as section 11272 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Case 3:09-cr-00443-MAG   Document 7   Filed 07/27/10   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:09-cr-00443-MAG   Document 7   Filed 07/27/10   Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Milton, Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 863]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 21, 1988 *(People v Milton,*144 AD2d 586), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered January 5, 1984.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Thompson, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.
### §3796d–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796d–3 was editorially reclassified as section 10304 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### Nicole A. Parkhill et al., Appellants, v John M. Cleary et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[716 NYS2d 925]

—Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs *(see, Matter of Eric D.*[appeal No. 1], 162 AD2d 1051). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J. — Discovery.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Susan Brenner, Respondent, v William A. Brenner, Appellant.

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered August 23, 1976, denying the motion to set aside decision made April 14, 1976, and for a new hearing, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In the interest of procedural regularity, the court grants relief to appeal from said order of the Family Court *nunc pro tunc.*To the extent that the appeal may be deemed an appeal from the decision of the Family Court, New York County, dated April 14, 1976, the appeal is dismissed, without costs. In this proceeding by petitioner, former wife, to increase the amount of child support to be payable by her ex-husband, respondent in the Family Court (hereinafter "appellant”), the Family Court after an evidentiary hearing rendered a decision dated April 14, 1976 directing the increase of the amount of child support from $50 per week for the two children to $125 per week. It is not entirely clear on this record whether or not that decision constituted an appealable order or judgment; in any event, appellant did not appeal from it. Instead, appellant moved to set aside the decision; that motion was denied by the Family Court by a "decision and order” of August 23, 1976. By notice of appeal dated September 13, 1976, appellant has appealed from the order of August 23, 1976 "and motion to set aside the decision of above action and decision in above action made April 14, 1976 and for a new hearing.” (Appellant is a member of the bar appearing *pro se.)*The August 23, 1976 denial of the motion to set aside the previous decision was obviously correct. No accepted legal grounds for *814setting aside a decision after trial were shown. Such new evidence as appellant attempted to adduce had been available to him at the earlier hearing, and, in any event, was not decisive. No appeal lay as of right from the order of August 23, 1976 because that order was not an "order of disposition” within the meaning of section 1112 of the Family Court Act. *(Matter of Lance S.,*51 AD2d 1057.) Rather than dismiss that appeal, however, in the circumstances of this case, as the appeal has been heard and we are affirming that order on the merits, we grant leave to appeal from that order *nunc pro tunc,*in the interest of procedural regularity. As to the "decision” of April 14, 1976, there are several difficulties. To begin with, appellant has not furnished us with the minutes of all the hearings that led to this decision, and thus we are unable to review it on the merits. Furthermore, if that decision was itself an order, appealable as of right or by permission of this court, then the notice of appeal is untimely. (Family Ct Act, § 1113.) If the decision is not an order, then there is nothing to appeal from at this point. For all these reasons, the appeal from the April 14, 1976 "decision” must be dismissed. Finally, we.earnestly recommend to appellant that he not represent himself in any further proceedings. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Silverman and Evans, JJ.; Markewich, J., concurs in the result only.