alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,991
<SECURITIES>                                    83,026
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,663
<PP&E>                                          49,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,583
<BONDS>                                         14,461
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       454,580
<OTHER-SE>                                    (344,463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,897
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,773
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (95,002)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (95,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (95,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.85)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stanley E. Konieczny, Respondent, v. Pease Oil Company, Appellant.

Motion granted to the extent that order entered May 5, 1960 dismissing appeal vacated; appeal dismissed unless printed records and briefs are filed and served on or before July 15,1960, and case ready for argument at September 1960 Term of court; stay of execution of judgment denied. A stay of execution must be obtained by complying with section 594 of the Civil Practice Act.
#### § 92.5 Acceptability of notarial acts under State or territorial law.

The acceptability with the jurisdiction of a State or Territory of the United States of a certificate of a notarial act performed by a notarizing officer depends upon the laws of the State or Territory.

[60 FR 51721, Oct. 3, 1995]
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Lionel Davis, Respondent.

[716 NYS2d 712]

—Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (De-Riggi, J.), entered January 24, 2000, granting those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and statements he made to law enforcement authorities. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, entered March 1, 2000, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination *{see,*CPLR 5517 [b]).

*463Ordered that the appeal from the order entered January 24, 2000, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order entered March 1, 2000, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered March 1, 2000, is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law, the order entered January 24, 2000, is vacated, those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statements to law enforcement authorities are denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Upon observing the driver of a vehicle and the defendant in the front passenger seat without seat belts driving “uncomfortably close” to the patrol car, the police officers ran a computer check on the vehicle which revealed that it was stolen. Contrary to the finding made by the Supreme Court, that information provided the police officers with probable cause to arrest the defendant *(see, People v Shepherd,*239 AD2d 445; *People v Vaccaro,*214 AD2d 981; *People v Koposesky,*25 AD2d 777; *see also, People v Roby,*39 NY2d 69; *Matter of Antonio R.,*186 AD2d 200), and to search the defendant’s person incident to the arrest *(see, People v Koposesky, supra).*As a result, it was error to suppress the voluntary statements made by the defendant at the precinct as the “fruit of the poisonous tree”.

The defendant did not challenge the reliability of the computer information possessed by the police officers. As a result, that information is presumed reliable, and any claim that the People failed to produce the “sending officer” is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Landy,*59 NY2d 369, 375; *People v Lypka,*36 NY2d 210, 213; *People v Vaccaro,*supra;*People v Ward,*95 AD2d 233, 236-237). Moreover, under these circumstances, it was error for the Supreme Court to base its suppression determination on the People’s failure to produce the “sending officer.” Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
### §6211. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–469, title I, §103(1), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2029

Section, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §102, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 876; Pub. L. 94–385, title I, §164, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1142; Pub. L. 95–619, title VI, §691(b)(2), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3288; Pub. L. 95–620, title VIII, §802, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3347, provided for incentives to develop underground coal mines.
#### § 9.11 Systematic declassification review.

The Director of the Office of Information Programs and Services shall be responsible for conducting a program for systematic declassification review of historically valuable records that: were exempted from the automatic declassification provisions of section 3.3 of the Executive Order; or will soon become subject to the automatic declassification provisions of section 3.3 of the Order. The Director shall prioritize such review in accordance with priorities established by the National Declassification Center.
§ 221.12 Guarantee eligibility. ( a ) Eligible Notes only may be guaranteed hereunder. Notes in order to achieve Eligible Note status must be signed on behalf of the Borrower, manually or in facsimile, by a duly authorized representative of the Borrower; and they must contain a guarantee legend incorporating these Standard Terms and Conditions signed on behalf of A.I.D. by either a manual signature or a facsimile signature of an authorized representative of A.I.D., together with a certificate of authentication manually executed by a Fiscal Agent whose appointment by the Borrower is consented to by A.I.D. in a Fiscal Agency Agreement (the “Fiscal Agent”).
( b ) A.I.D. shall designate, in a certificate delivered to the Fiscal Agent, the Person(s) whose signature shall be binding on A.I.D. The certificate of authentication of the Fiscal Agent issued pursuant to the Fiscal Agency Agreement shall, when manually executed by the Fiscal Agent, be conclusive evidence binding on A.I.D. that a Note has been duly executed on behalf of the Borrower and delivered.
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.61 Place of application. ( a ) *Alien to apply in consular district of residence.* Unless otherwise directed by the Department, an alien applying for an immigrant visa shall make application at the consular office having jurisdiction over the alien's place of residence; except that, unless otherwise directed by the Department, an alien physically present in an area but having no residence therein may make application at the consular office having jurisdiction over that area if the alien can establish that he or she will be able to remain in the area for the period required to process the application. Finally, a consular office may, as a matter of discretion, or shall, at the direction of the Department, accept an immigrant visa application from an alien who is neither a resident of, nor physically present in, the area designated for that office for such purpose. For the purposes of this section, an alien physically present in the United States shall be considered to be a resident of the area of his or her last residence prior to entry into the United States.
( b ) *Transfer of immigrant visa cases.* ( 1 ) All documents, papers, and other evidence relating to an applicant whose case is pending or has been refused at one post may be transferred to another post at the applicant's request and risk when there is reasonable justification for the transfer and the transferring post has no reason to believe that the alien will be unable to appear at the receiving post.
( 2 ) Any approved petition granting immediate relative or preference status should be included among the documents when a case is transferred from one post to another.
( 3 ) In no case may a visa number be transferred from one post to another. A visa number which cannot be used as a result of the transfer must be returned to the Department immediately.
[52 FR 42613, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 39955, Aug. 4, 1994]
§ 100.50 Real estate practices prohibited. ( a ) This subpart provides the Department's interpretation of conduct that is unlawful housing discrimination under section 804 and section 806 of the Fair Housing Act. In general the prohibited actions are set forth under sections of this subpart which are most applicable to the discriminatory conduct described. However, an action illustrated in one section can constitute a violation under sections in the subpart. For example, the conduct described in § 100.60(b)(3) and (4) would constitute a violation of § 100.65(a) as well as § 100.60(a).
( b ) It shall be unlawful to: ( 1 ) Refuse to sell or rent a dwelling after a *bona fide* offer has been made, or to refuse to negotiate for the sale or rental of a dwelling because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin, or to discriminate in the sale or rental of a dwelling because of handicap.
( 2 ) Discriminate in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with sales or rentals, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 3 ) Engage in any conduct relating to the provision of housing which otherwise makes unavailable or denies dwellings to persons because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 4 ) Make, print or publish, or cause to be made, printed or published, any notice, statement or advertisement with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling that indicates any preference, limitation or discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or an intention to make any such preference, limitation or discrimination.
( 5 ) Represent to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin that a dwelling is not available for sale or rental when such dwelling is in fact available.
( 6 ) Engage in blockbusting practices in connection with the sale or rental of dwellings because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( 7 ) Deny access to or membership or participation in, or to discriminate against any person in his or her access to or membership or participation in, any multiple-listing service, real estate brokers' association, or other service organization or facility relating to the business of selling or renting a dwelling or in the terms or conditions or membership or participation, because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
( c ) The application of the Fair Housing Act with respect to persons with handicaps is discussed in subpart D of this part.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MemberWorks Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
B. Duffy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. Duffy
------------------
James B. Duffy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
MemberWorks Incorporated
February 7, 2004















A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Valero Refining

- Texas, L.P. and Valero Refining Co. Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00149

- CV

Trial court case number: 2012

- 56551

Trial court: 215th Di strict Court of Harris County

The Court requests a response from Real Party in Interest Harris County Appraisal

District to the Petitio n for Mandamus . The response, if any, should be filed with the Court by

March 14, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s sig nature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acti ng individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 20, 2014
### §300hh–37. One Health framework

#### (a) One Health framework

The Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as the "Secretary"), acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall develop, or update as appropriate, in coordination with other Federal departments and agencies, as appropriate, a One Health framework to address zoonotic diseases and advance public health preparedness.

#### (b) One Health coordination

The Secretary, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, shall coordinate with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Interior to develop a One Health coordination mechanism at the Federal level to strengthen One Health collaboration related to prevention, detection, control, and response for zoonotic diseases and related One Health work across the Federal Government.

#### (c) Reporting

Not later than 1 year after December 29, 2022, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report providing an update on the activities under subsections (a) and (b).

(Pub. L. 117–328, div. FF, title II, §2235, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5755.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Prepare for and Respond to Existing Viruses, Emerging New Threats, and Pandemics Act, also known as the PREVENT Pandemics Act, and also as part of the Health Extenders, Improving Access to Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP, and Strengthening Public Health Act of 2022, and not as part of the Public Health Service Act which comprises this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.23 Certain former U.S. citizens. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Military expatriates.* An alien shall be classifiable as a special immigrant under INA 101(a)(27)(B) if the consular officer is satisfied by appropriate evidence that the alien was formerly a U.S. citizen and that the alien lost citizenship under the circumstances set forth in INA 327.
[56 FR 49676, Oct. 1, 1991, as amended at 85 FR 38322, June 26, 2020]
UPDATED INCOME AND PAYROLL TAX OFFSETS

TO CHANGES IN EXCISE TAX REVENUES FOR 2020-20301

Table 1, below, presents the updated income and payroll tax offsets that the staff of the 

Joint Committee on Taxation (“Joint Committee staff”) will apply in its economic models of 

proposed changes in Federal excise taxes during the remainder of the second session of the 116th

Congress. This update accounts for the COVID-19 related economic downturn by using the July 

2020 macroeconomic forecast of the Congressional Budget Office.2 The Joint Committee staff 

explained the methodology underlying these estimates in a prior publication.3

The new offsets are calculated on a calendar year basis. The new income and payroll tax 

offsets will be applied to excise tax estimates. Generally, these offsets will be applied to 

calendar year excise tax effects and then fiscalized. With this publication the Joint Committee 

staff plans to start using these offsets exclusively.

Table 1.–Income and Payroll Tax Offsets Under Present Law Baseline 2020 Through 2030

Item 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

Income and 

Payroll Excise Tax 

Offsets ............. 0.211 0.212 0.215 0.216 0.217 0.218 0.241 0.242 0.242 0.242 0.242

1 This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, New Income and Payroll Tax 

Offsets to Changes in Excise Tax Revenues for 2020–2030 (JCX-20-20), August 6, 2020. This document can also be 

found on the Joint Committee on Taxation website at www.jct.gov.

2 See, Congressional Budget Office, An Update to the Economic Outlook: 2020 to 2030, July 2, 2020, 

Washington DC.

3 Joint Committee on Taxation, The Income and Payroll Tax Offset to Changes in Excise Tax Revenues

(JCX-59-11), December 23, 2011.

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION

August 6, 2020

JCX-20-20
The increase in the magnitude of the offset for years after 2025 is due to the expiration of 

certain tax provisions after December 31, 2025.4 As a result, the estimated income and payroll 

excise tax offsets return close to the long-time standard offset factor of 25 percent. The offsets 

calculated above take into account both the changes in tax rates that have been legislated to occur 

over the budget window, as well as adjustments to the taxable portion of income consistent with 

the July 2020 Congressional Budget Office macroeconomic forecast.

4

 For tax provisions after December 31, 2025, see, Joint Committee on Taxation, List of Expiring Federal 

Tax Provisions 2020–2029 (JCX-1-20), January 16, 2020.
Todd C. Emerson, #8175 

444 South River Road 

St. George, Utah, 84 790 

Telephone: (435) 634-3530 

Facsimile: (435) 634-3505 

RECEIVED 

FEB -4 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

JOINT MOTION TO STAY 

PROCEEDINGS 

Case Numbers- See Below 

Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Respondent, SkyWest Airlines, Inc. ("Sky West"), by its counsel, and Complainant, 

Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA''), by its counsel, respectfully request a stay of the 

following hearings currently scheduled for February 18, 2014 thru February 21, 2014 in Salt 

Lake City, Utah: 

Case No. 2011NM060038 

Case No. 2011NM060047 

Case No. 2011NM060063 

Case No. 2011NM060072 

Case No. 2011NM060073 

Case No. 2011NM060081 

Case No. 2011NM060095 

Case No. 2012NM060014 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0874 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0872 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0873 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0869 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0868 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0904 

DMS No. FAA-2013-0617 

DMS No. FAA-2013-0619 

The parties are engaged in global settlement negotiations, which may result in the 

resolution of these and other pending matters, and respectfully request that the above-referenced 
cases be stayed until the parties notify :the court offhta!. settlement, or in :the alternative, the desire 

to proceed to trial. 

With respect to Case No. 2011NM06QOQS. (I)MS No. FAA-2012·0777), the parties are 

each filing Motions for Decision and a heating is not required. With re!lpect to Case N<>, 

2011NM060049 (DMS No. FAA-21}12-0776), the parties Mve settled this matter, and a Notice of 

Dismissal will be sent to the court upon final execution. 

DATED thls 31" day ofJanuary, :2014. 

~wc.k=.- Todd C. Emerson 

Attomey ~lSkyWest c•s 

/1 ( -, J t1./!ir:tilU"t, /t...,__~- Mtchael L. Dworki 

At!arney for fikyWest Airlines 

4 ./1' 1/%./17-

--···~·-.. ·········~··················~-· , Harper · ~--

Y for the Federal Aviation Administration 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

3•0.. f"-ebn-ttt V''l 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this :;-pi day of:hn:mary, 2014, a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS was served as follows: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

{Federal Express} 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

{Federal Express} 

3
Case 3:08-cv-05049-MHP Document 76 Filed 08/24/10 Page 1 of 2
8/23/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cv-05049-MHP Document 76 Filed 08/24/10 Page 2 of 2
# MD5 checksums generated by MD5summer (http://www.md5summer.org)
# Generated 10/7/2009 1:27:00 PM

2c030bdbdf0a2874008774c62551f1a1 *2000IRGU.pdf
§ 103.410 Election of civil action or provision of administrative proceeding. ( a ) If a charge is issued under § 103.405, a complainant (including the Assistant Secretary, if HUD filed the complaint), a respondent, or an aggrieved person on whose behalf the complaint is filed may elect, in lieu of an administrative proceeding under 24 CFR part 180, to have the claims asserted in the charge decided in a civil action under section 812(o) of the Fair Housing Act.
( b ) The election must be made not later than 20 says after the receipt of service of the charge, or in the case of the Assistant Secretary, not later than 20 days after service. The notice of election must be filed with the Docket Clerk in the Office of Hearings and Appeals and served on the General Counsel, the Assistant Secretary, the respondent, and the aggrieved persons on whose behalf the complaint was filed. The notification will be filed and served in accordance with the procedures established under 24 CFR part 180.
( c ) If an election is not made under this section, the General Counsel will maintain an administrative proceeding based on the charge in accordance with the procedures under 24 CFR part 180.
( d ) If an election is made under this section, the General Counsel shall immediately notify and authorize the Attorney General to commence and maintain a civil action seeking relief under section 812(o) of the Fair Housing Act on behalf of the aggrieved person in an appropriate United States District Court. Such notification and authorization shall include transmission of the file in the case, including a copy of the final investigative report and the charge, to the Attorney General.
( e ) The General Counsel shall be available for consultation concerning any legal issues raised by the Attorney General as to how best to proceed in the event that a new court decision or newly discovered evidence is regarded as relevant to the reasonable cause determination.
[54 FR 3292, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 52218, Oct. 4, 1996; 74 FR 4635, Jan. 26, 2009; 87 FR 8197, Feb. 14, 2022]