alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2515 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2515

 To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for mental health 
                    courts through fiscal year 2011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

Mr. Strickland introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for mental health 
                    courts through fiscal year 2011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1001(a)(20) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(20)) is amended by striking 
``fiscal years 2001 through 2004'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2006 
through 2011''.
                                 <all>
```
### §4632. Administration; relocation assistance in programs receiving Federal financial assistance

In order to prevent unnecessary expenses and duplications of functions, and to promote uniform and effective administration of relocation assistance programs for displaced persons under sections 4626, 4630, and 4635 of this title, a State agency may enter into contracts with any individual, firm, association, or corporation for services in connection with such programs, or may carry out its functions under this subchapter through any Federal or State governmental agency or instrumentality having an established organization for conducting relocation assistance programs. Such State agency shall, in carrying out the relocation assistance activities described in section 4626 of this title, whenever practicable, utilize the services of State or local housing agencies, or other agencies having experience in the administration or conduct of similar housing assistance activities.

(Pub. L. 91–646, title II, §212, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1900.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 08-4417 EDL

SANFORD M. CIPINKO (SBN 88102)

JEREMY CLOYD (SBN 239991)

Law Offices of Sanford M. Cipinko

55 Francisco Street, Suite 403

San Francisco, CA 94133

Telephone: (415) 693-9905

Facsimile: (415) 693-9904

Attorneys for Plaintiff, Eric Sedie

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

JOANN M. SWANSON (CABN 88143)

Chief, Civil Division

MELISSA K. BROWN (CABN 203307)

Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102-3495

Telephone: (415) 436-6962

FAX: (415) 436-6748

melissa.k.brown@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ERIC SEDIE,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-4417 EDL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Case 3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document 166 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 3 Case3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document165 Filed03/10/10 Page1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 08-4417 EDL 2

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2010, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

issued an Order allowing the parties to file revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of

law on March 11, 2010. 

WHEREAS, the plaintiff Eric Sedie (“Plaintiff”) by and through his counsel has

requested additional time to file the revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and

the defendant United States (“Defendant”) by and through its counsel agrees to such request;

ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree to the following: the parties shall have until March

19, 2010 to file and serve their revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DATED: March 10, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

/s/ Melissa Brown

________________________________

MELISSA K. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

DATED: March 10, 2010

LAW OFFICES OF SANFORD CIPINKO

Attorneys at Law

/s/ Jeremy Cloyd

________________________________

SANFORD CIPINKO

JEREMY CLOYD

Attorneys for the Plaintiff

Case 3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document 166 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 3 Case3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document165 Filed03/10/10 Page2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C 08-4417 EDL 3

[PROPOSED ] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the parties shall have until March 19, 2010 to

file and serve their revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _______________ ____________________________

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document165 Filed03/10/10 Page3 of 3

March 10, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04417-EDL Document 166 Filed 03/10/10 Page 3 of 3
### §3754. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3754 was editorially reclassified as section 10155 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
# Subpart 527.3 - Patent Rights under Government Contracts

**Parent topic:**Part 527 - Patents, Data, and Copyrights

## 527.306 Licensing background patent rights to third parties.

For a D&F for licensing to third parties, submit the D&F for the Administrator’s approval through the SPE (see FAR 27.306).
### §4592. Recordkeeping for audit

(a) Each recipient of assistance under this chapter pursuant to grants or contracts entered into under other than competitive bidding procedures shall keep such records as the Secretary shall prescribe, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by such recipient of the proceeds of such grant or contract, the total cost of the project or undertaking in connection with which such grant or contract is given or used, and the amount of that portion of the cost of the project or undertaking supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

(b) The Secretary and Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for the purpose of audit and examination to any books, documents, papers, and records of such recipients that are pertinent to the grants or contracts entered into under the provisions of this chapter under other than competitive bidding procedures.

(Pub. L. 91–616, title VI, §602, formerly title V, §502, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1854, renumbered Pub. L. 94–371, §7, July 26, 1976, 90 Stat. 1038.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–616, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1848, known as the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation Act of 1970. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4541 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 94–371, §7, July 26, 1976, 90 Stat. 1038, redesignated title V of Pub. L. 91–616, which was classified to subchapter IV of this chapter, as title VI without renumbering the sections therein. Section 502 of Pub. L. 91–616 was renumbered 602, as the probable intent of Congress.
§ 223.6 Time, date and place of hearing. The examiner shall establish a reasonable time, date and place to conduct the hearing. In establishing a date, the examiner shall give due regard to the former employee's need for: ( a ) Adequate time to prepare a defense properly, and
( b ) An expeditious resolution of allegations that may be damaging to his or her reputation.
#### § 909.3 Board recommendation.

Where the Board's decision is a recommendation, it shall be directed to the head of the Agency. A copy of the decision shall be supplied to each party.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALPHONSO OLIPHANT, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

et al.,

Defendants

 /

No. C-08-5048 MMC

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL MATERIALS RELATED

TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN LIMINE

NO. 2; DIRECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS

Before the Court is defendants’ “Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials

Related to Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 2 Regarding Qualified Immunity,” filed May 25,

2010. Having read and considered the administrative motion, the Court rules as follows:

1. Because defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 2 references matter that appears to

consist of confidential personnel records, defendants’ administrative motion is hereby

GRANTED. Accordingly, defendants are hereby DIRECTED to electronically file, no later

than June 3, 2010, the unredacted version of Motion in Limine No. 2 under seal. See

General Order No. 62 (“If a motion to file under seal is granted in part or full, the requesting

party will e-file the document under seal according to the procedures outlined in the FAQs

on the ECF website.”).

2. Under the Civil Local Rules of this District, a request to file a document under

Case 3:08-cv-05048-MMC Document 101 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

These examples are illustrative in nature.

2

seal “must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.” See Civil L.R.

79-5(a). Here, defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 2 does not, in its entirety, consist of

sealable material. For example, Motion in Limine No. 2 includes a discussion of legal

principles applicable to qualified immunity as well as a summary of evidence previously

filed in the public record.1

 Accordingly, defendants are hereby DIRECTED to electronically

file, no later than June 3, 2010, a redacted version of Motion in Limine No. 2 in the public

record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 1, 2010 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-05048-MMC Document 101 Filed 06/01/10 Page 2 of 2
Case3:08-cv-00694-JCS Document128 Filed01/11/10 Page1 of 1

Dated: Jan. 12, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Joseph C. Spero

Case 3:08-cv-00694-JCS Document 130 Filed 01/12/10 Page 1 of 1
### §3797s–4. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797s–4 was editorially reclassified as section 10595 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §3797s–2. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797s–2 was editorially reclassified as section 10593 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### In the Matter of Marshall Warren, v Philip L. Toia, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Determination of the respondent State commissioner dated June 2, 1976, unanimously modified, on the law, to limit recoupment to 10% of household needs and otherwise confirmed, without costs and without disbursements (see *Matter of Reyes v Dumpson,*40 NY2d 725; *Matter of Lajara v Berger,*59 AD2d 599). No opinion. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silver-man, Fein and Markewich, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,780
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,946
<PP&E>                                         151,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 676,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                     364,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   676,604
<SALES>                                        273,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               273,168
<CGS>                                          170,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  170,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (448)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,240)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,240)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: 

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION

SECURITIES LITIGATION.

This Document Relates

To All Cases.

 /

No. C 08-01510 WHA

REQUEST

FOR CALCULATIONS 

FOR TRIAL

Both sides are invited to run calculations to ascertain how the fund would have done if the

25-percent non-guaranteed mortgaged-back securities limitation had been honored with the

excess over the 25 percent being: (a) kept in cash (Calculation One), and (b) distributed pro rata

among the other non-guaranteed mortgage-back securities investments (up to the limit of any

other industry limitation) (Calculation Two). These should then be pared down to those who

were shareholders as of the date of the mortgage-back securities industry limitation deletion. 

This should then be compared to the way it did turn out. This should be done in time for each

side to depose the experts on these calculations reasonably before trial. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 30, 2010. 

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-01733-WHA Document 48 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Valero Refining - Texas, L.P. and Valero Refining Co. Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00149-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-56551

Trial court: 215th District Court of Harris County

The Court requests a response from Real Party in Interest Harris County Appraisal 

District to the Petition for Mandamus. The response, if any, should be filed with the Court by 

March 14, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 20, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 260 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 260

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify the requirements 
for a child born abroad and out of wedlock to acquire citizenship based 
   on the citizenship of the child's father, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2005

   Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to modify the requirements 
for a child born abroad and out of wedlock to acquire citizenship based 
   on the citizenship of the child's father, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Father's Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF CITIZENSHIP FOR CHILDREN BORN ABROAD AND OUT OF 
              WEDLOCK TO A UNITED STATES CITIZEN FATHER.

    Section 309(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1409(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by adding ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by striking paragraph (3);
            (3) in paragraph (4), by striking ``while the person is 
        under the age of 18 years--'' and inserting ``at any time--''; 
        and
            (4) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3).

SEC. 3. CLARIFICATION REGARDING DECEASED PARENTS OF CHILDREN BORN 
              ABROAD AND OUT OF WEDLOCK.

    Section 309 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1409) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude a 
person who is a citizen or national of the United States by virtue of a 
provision of this section from establishing such status under this 
title after the death of the person's father, mother, or parents.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to persons born out of 
wedlock who are alive on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,037
<SECURITIES>                                    10,029
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       533
<INVENTORY>                                        151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,162
<PP&E>                                           4,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,978
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,412
<CGS>                                              685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (204)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
### §3549. Investigation of violations

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, on and after February 20, 2003, the Chief Financial Officer of the Department of Housing and Urban Development shall, in consultation with the Budget Officer, have sole authority to investigate potential or actual violations under the Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341 et seq.) and all other statutes and regulations related to the obligation and expenditure of funds made available in this, or any other Act; shall determine whether violations exist; and shall submit final reports on violations to the Secretary, the President, the Office of Management and Budget and the Congress in accordance with applicable statutes and Office of Management and Budget circulars.

(Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title II, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 499.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2003, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, and not as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Duties of Chief Financial Officer

Pub. L. 109–115, div. A, title III, Nov. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2457, which provided that the Chief Financial Officer establish control of and maintain adequate systems of accounting for appropriations and other available funds as required by 31 U.S.C. 1514, and further provided that, for purposes of funds control and Anti-Deficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341 et seq.) violation determinations, the point of obligation was to be the executed agreement or contract, with certain exceptions, and that the Chief Financial Officer was to appoint and train qualified personnel to conduct investigations, establish guidelines and timeframes for such investigations, prescribe requirements for final reports on violations, and prescribe procedures for conducting investigations of, and reporting on, Anti-Deficiency Act violations, was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. I, title II, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3312.

Pub. L. 108–199, div. G, title II, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 389.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. K, title II, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 499, as amended by Pub. L. 108–199, div. G, title II, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 389.