alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 92.3 Consular districts.

Where consular districts have been established, the geographic limits of the district determine the area in which notarial acts can be performed by the notarizing officer. See § 92.41 (b) regarding authentication of the seals and signatures of foreign officials outside the consular district.

[27 FR 12616, Dec. 20, 1962, as amended at 60 FR 51723, Oct. 3, 1995]
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 428 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 428

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2011

    Mr. Heller (for himself, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Thompson of 
 Pennsylvania, and Mr. Connolly of Virginia) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telephone Excise Tax Repeal Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 33 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking subchapter B.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4293 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 
        4121) and subchapter B of chapter 33,'' and inserting ``and 
        chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by sections 4064 and 
        4121),''.
            (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``section 4251 or''.
            (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (i) by striking ``imposed by--'' and all that 
                follows through ``with respect to'' and inserting 
                ``imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect to'', 
                and
                    (ii) by striking ``bills rendered or''.
            (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``Communications Services and''.
            (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``4251, 4261, or 4271'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``4261 or 4271''.
            (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such Code is 
        amended by inserting ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B), by 
        striking subparagraph (C), and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (D) as subparagraph (C).
            (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of such Code is 
        amended by striking the item relating to subchapter B.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills first rendered more than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §5161. Audits and investigations

#### (a) In general

Subject to the provisions of chapter 75 of title 31, relating to requirements for single audits, the President shall conduct audits and investigations as necessary to assure compliance with this chapter, and in connection therewith may question such persons as may be necessary to carry out such audits and investigations.

#### (b) Access to records

For purposes of audits and investigations under this section, the President and Comptroller General may inspect any books, documents, papers, and records of any person relating to any activity undertaken or funded under this chapter.

#### (c) State and local audits

The President may require audits by State and local governments in connection with assistance under this chapter when necessary to assure compliance with this chapter or related regulations.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §318, as added Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §105(m)(1), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–288, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 143. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5121 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 318 of Pub. L. 93–288 was renumbered section 315 by Pub. L. 100–707 and is classified to section 5158 of this title.
Subpart 525.1 - Buy American Act—Supplies

Parent topic: Part 525 - Foreign Acquisition

525.103 Exceptions

(a) Public Interest.

(1) Only the head of the agency may make the determination required by FAR 25.103(a). The head of

the agency may not redelegate this authority.

(2) The determination must consider the cost advantages of any foreign sourced steel, iron, or

manufactured goods.

(b) Nonavailability.

(1) Class Determinations. FAR 25.103(b)(1)(i) does not allow for class determinations to be made at

the agency level

(2) Class Determinations– Notice of Availability. Regarding FAR 25.103(b)(1)(iii)(C), documentation

supporting removal of an item from the list of Nonavailable Articles at FAR 25.104 should be

submitted by the contracting officer to the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) in the Office of the

Chief Acquisition Officer. The SPE will determine whether the documentation should be forwarded

to the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC).

(3) Individual Determinations. Only the HCA may make the determination required by FAR

25.103(b)(2)(i). The HCA may not redelegate this authority.

(4) Individual Determinations—Notice of Nonavailability. Regarding when the contracting officer

considers that non-availability of an item will affect future acquisitions (see FAR 25.103(b)(2)(ii)),

documentation supporting the addition of articles to the list of Nonavailable Articles at FAR 25.104

should be submitted by the contracting officer to the SPE. The SPE will determine whether the

documentation should be forwarded to the CAAC.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Vasquez, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 571]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Drager, J. on speedy trial motion; Mary McGowan Davis, J. at jury trial and sentence), rendered May 30,1997, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 to 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

The court properly denied defendant’s speedy trial motion. The court properly concluded that the People’s certificate of readiness was not illusory, notwithstanding subsequent unreadiness on the part of the People *(People v Acosta,*249 AD2d 161, *lv denied*92 NY2d 892).

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Williams, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.
#### William W. Millington, Appellant, v. William Dabinett et al., Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The action is brought under article 15 of the Real Property Law for the determination of a claim to real property and seeks an adjudication of title and that plaintiff be awarded possession of the real property described in the complaint. The motion was made on January 5, 1959 pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. There was no provision in rule 113 as it existed at the time this motion was made for summary judgment in an action of this nature. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
#### Amherst Bowling Center, Inc., Respondent, v. Joseph C. Dolce, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Ross A. Mauri, Deceased, *635Appellant.

— Appeal dismissed unless printed records and briefs are filed and served on or before August 1,1960.
All Iftron 5.8GHz transmitters have a four position DIP switch to select the channel and control the battery

saver cell count with the exception of the Stinger 25 which does not have a battery saver.

Channel SW3 SW2 SW1

1 ON ON ON

2 ON ON OFF

3 ON OFF ON

4 ON OFF OFF

5 OFF ON ON

6 OFF ON OFF

7 OFF OFF ON

BATTERY SAVER (all but Stinger 25mW)

This will shut down the transmitter and a camera if powered from the transmitter when the battery gets low. To

defeat this feature, use a 3 cell battery and se t the switch to 2 cells.

SW4 Battery saver mode

OFF Off at 5.4V, back on at 5.7V (2 cell)

ON Off at 8.4V, back on at 8.7V (3 cell)

TRANSMITTER PLUG ‘N PLAY CONNECTIONSTRANSMITTER CURRENT REQUIREMENTS

Note: Never operate these transmitters with out an antenna!

Cells / Voltage Mondo (500mW) Stinger (250mW) Stinger (100mW) Stinger (25mW)

2 / 7.4V 510mA 470mA 230mA 90mA

3 / 11.1V 340mA 280mA 160mA 60mA

4 / 14.8V 250mA 110mA 50mA

RECEIVER CURRENT REQUIREMENTS

Cells / Voltage YellowJacket Pr o 5.8 Nano 5.8

2 / 7.4V 400mA 280mA

3 / 11.1V 260mA 280mA
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Law Offices of 

GEORGE C. BOISSEAU 

State Bar Number 75872

740 4 Street th

Second Floor

Santa Rosa, California 95404

Phone: (707) 578-5636

Fax: (707) 578-1141

E-Mail: boisseaugc@msn.com

Attorney for Defendant

ABELARDO GARCIA-REYES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CR-09-0705-MMC 

)

Plaintiff, ) [Proposed]

) STIPULATION AND ORDER 

v. ) CONTINUING SUPERVISED

) RELEASE VIOLATION HEARING

)

ABELARDO GARCIA-REYES, )

)

Defendant. )

 )

 

Defendant, ABELARDO GARCIA-REYES, by and through defendant’s attorney of

record, George C. Boisseau, and agreement of the Government and the United States

Probation Department, hereby requests that the supervised release violation hearing set for

April 8, 2015, be continued until May 13, 2015, at 2:15 in the afternoon. The reason for the

request is that the defense is requesting the retest of the reference samples, sweat patches in

question, and has only recently obtained the response from Clinical Reference Laboratory, Inc.

regarding the procedures necessary for the retesting.

1

Case 3:09-cr-00705-MMC Document 32 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 6, 2015 

 /s/ 

GEORGE C. BOISSEAU

Attorney for Defendant

ABELARDO GARCIA-REYES

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 6, 2015

 /s/ 

ANDREW SCOBLE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, finding that the defense needs additional time to retest

the reference samples from the sweat patches at issue in this case, it is hereby ordered that

defendant's supervised release violation hearing on April 8, 2015, be continued to May 13, 

2015, at 2:15 in the afternoon. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 

 

HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

U.S. District Judge 

Northern District of California

2

April 7, 2015

Case 3:09-cr-00705-MMC Document 32 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2563 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility studies to 

address certain water shortages within the Snake, Boise, and Payette 

River systems in Idaho, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. OTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility studies to address certain water shortages within 

the Snake, Boise, and Payette River systems in Idaho, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT FEASIBILITY STUD4 IES. 

5 The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bu6 reau of Reclamation, is authorized to conduct feasibility 
2 

•HR 2563 IH 

1 studies to address water shortages within the Snake, 

2 Boise, and Payette River systems in Idaho. 

Æ
### §3214. Delegation of functions and transfer of funds among Federal agencies

#### (a) Delegation of functions to other Federal agencies

The Secretary may—

(1) delegate to the heads of other Federal agencies such functions, powers, and duties of the Secretary under this chapter as the Secretary determines to be appropriate; and

(2) authorize the redelegation of the functions, powers, and duties by the heads of the agencies.

#### (b) Transfer of funds to other Federal agencies

Funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter may be transferred between Federal agencies, if the funds are used for the purposes for which the funds are specifically authorized and appropriated.

#### (c) Transfer of funds from other Federal agencies

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), for the purposes of this chapter, the Secretary may accept transfers of funds from other Federal agencies if the funds are used for the purposes for which (and in accordance with the terms under which) the funds are specifically authorized and appropriated.

#### (2) Use of funds

The transferred funds—

(A) shall remain available until expended; and

(B) may, to the extent necessary to carry out this chapter, be transferred to and merged by the Secretary with the appropriations for salaries and expenses.

(Pub. L. 89–136, title VI, §604, as added Pub. L. 105–393, title I, §102(a), Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3614.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3214, Pub. L. 89–136, title VII, §704, Aug. 26, 1965, 79 Stat. 572; Pub. L. 94–487, title I, §120, Oct. 12, 1976, 90 Stat. 2336, related to transfer of functions of Area Redevelopment Administration, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(b)(3).

A prior section 604 of Pub. L. 89–136 was classified to section 3204 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–393, §102(a).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 11, 1999, see section 105 of Pub. L. 105–393, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Hugh B. Tilkins, Appellant.

Reargument of motion granted on court’s own motion, and upon reargument, motion granted to prosecute appeal on original papers, five copies of typewritten brief; Max Goldman, Esq., assigned as counsel to conduct appeal and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include March 1961 Term.
§ 96.5 Requirement that accrediting entity be a nonprofit or public entity. An accrediting entity must qualify as either: ( a ) An organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that has expertise in developing and administering standards for entities providing child welfare services; or
( b ) A public entity (other than a Federal entity), including, but not limited to, any State or local government or governmental unit or any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, that is responsible for licensing adoption agencies in a State and that has expertise in developing and administering standards for entities providing child welfare services.
STIP TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR ECO DRY F AMER. TO RESPOND TO CFE ’S 3RD AMD CMPT & CRS-CLAIM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4829 -4581 -4790.1 1

GLENN A. FRIEDMAN, SBN 104442

ROBERT FARRELL, SBN 107461

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

One Sansome Street, Suite 1400

San Francisco, CA 94104

Tel: 415.362.2580

Fax: 415.434.0882

Eml: friedman@lbbslaw.com

farrell@lbbslaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Counter-Defendant

ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

KFD ENTERPRISES, INC.,

a California corporation

dba NORMAN’S DRY CLEANER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF EUREKA, et al.,

Defendants.

AND ALL RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS AND

THIRD PARTY CLAIMS.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:08-cv-04571-MMC

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING TIME FOR ECO DRY

OF AMERICA, INC. TO RESPOND

TO CITY OF EUREKA’S THIRD AMENDED

COUNTER-CLAIM AND CROSS-CLAIM

Action Filed: 10/01/08

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between counsel for Defendant, CrossClaimant and Counter Claimant CITY OF EUREKA (“Eureka”) and Defendant, Cross-Defendant and

Counter-Defendant ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC. (“Eco Dry”) that Eco Dry shall have an extension

of time to and including June 4, 2010 to respond to Eureka’s Third Amended Counter-Claim and CrossClaim in this action.

////

////

////

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 239 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 2
STIP TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR ECO DRY F AMER. TO RESPOND TO CFE ’S 3RD AMD CMPT & CRS-CLAIM

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4829 -4581 -4790.1 2

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: May 21, 2010 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By /s/ ROBERT W. FARRELL

ROBERT W. FARRELL

Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Defendant

and Counter-Defendant

ECO DRY OF AMERICA, INC.

Dated: May 21, 2010 DAVIDOVITZ & BENNETT LLP

By /s/ CHARLES H. BLOOM

CHARLES H. BOLCOM

Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Claimant

and Counter-Claimant

THE CITY OF EUREKA

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: May __, 2010

By

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Court Judge

25

Case 3:08-cv-04571-SC Document 239 Filed 05/25/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 312.225 What actions must I take concerning employees who are convicted of drug violations in the workplace? There are two actions you must take if an employee is convicted of a drug violation in the workplace: ( a ) First, you must notify Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, as required by § 312.205(c)(2), or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Second, within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either— ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
#### §§ 274.102-274.126 [Reserved]
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND

RESTATED 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (the “First Amendment”) to the SECOND RESTATED 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN
(“Plan”) is executed as of July 1, 2010. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan.



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of Equity Residential (the “Company”) adopted the Plan on
February 21, 2002, which was approved by the shareholders of the Company at the 2002 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders.



     WHEREAS, the Company restated the Plan pursuant to a Second Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan
dated December 10, 2008, to provide for one consolidated Plan incorporating the terms and
provisions of all prior amendments.



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify the Committee’s authority to
determine the awards granted annually under the Plan to Trustees (excluding the Chairman of the
Board and employee trustees) for their service on the Board, all in accordance with the provisions
of the Plan.



     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:



     1. Participation. Paragraph 3(b) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the
following is substituted therefor:



          (b) Board of Trustees. Each member of the Board of Trustees (excluding the Chairman of
the Board and employee trustees whose awards are granted pursuant to paragraph 3(a) of the Plan)
may receive an annual award (relating to the Trustee’s service on the Board for a one-year term) as
determined by the Committee from time to time, subject to the provisions of the Plan. If an
individual first becomes a Trustee following the annual award, the Trustee’s award will be
pro-rated based on the prior annual trustee award multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which
is the number of days left in said one-year term from the date of such Trustee’s election or
appointment to the Board of Trustees, until the anniversary of the immediately preceding
shareholders’ meeting at which trustees were re-elected, and the denominator of which is 365.
Trustees may, in addition to the award under this paragraph, also receive awards under paragraph
3(a).




     2. Plan in Full Force and Effect. After giving effect to this First Amendment, the
Plan remains in full force and effect.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Bruce C. Strohm
 	 
	 	 	Bruce C. Strohm      	 
	 	 	Executive Vice President and General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John B. Meyers, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for reconsideration of his motion for assignment of counsel, granted. On reconsideration, motion for counsel assignment granted. August Zolotorofe, Esq., 26 Court Street, Brooklyn, New York, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.