alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carmine Stella, certify that:





1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capital Beverage Corporation.;





2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:





a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.             I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:





a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6.             I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date:  May 24, 2010

By:
/s/ Carmine N. StellaCarmine N. Stella

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2469 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2469

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on certain semi-manufactured 
                             forms of gold.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2005

 Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend temporarily the duty suspension on certain semi-manufactured 
                             forms of gold.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SEMI-MANUFACTURED FORMS OF GOLD.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.71.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2003'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Retroactive application.--Notwithstanding section 514 
        of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law, the 
        entry of any article--
                    (A) that was made on or after January 1, 2004, and 
                before the 15th day after the date of the enactment of 
                this Act, and
                    (B) with respect to which there would have been no 
                duty if the amendment made by subseciton (a) were in 
                effect on the date of such entry,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 
        applied to such entry, and any amounts owed shall be paid to 
        the importer of record.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 19-2700

AMILCAR ANTONIO FRANCISCO-LOPEZ,

 Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

(Agency No.: A041-811-480)

Immigration Judge: Honorable Nelson Vargas Padilla

Before: SHWARTZ, SCIRICA, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS SO ORDERED, that the published Opinion in the above case, filed on 

May 15, 2020, be amended as follows:

On page 9, footnote 5, delete the following:

5 At the time the BIA rendered its decision in Francisco’s case, the BIA’s decision in 

Obeya had been reversed by the Second Circuit. Retroactivity aside, we could not affirm 

the BIA’s decision on “the grounds upon which the agency acted,” SEC v. Chenery 
2

Corp., 318 U.S. 80, 95 (1943), because the BIA relied on precedent that was no longer 

good law. See Henriquez Dimas v. Sessions, 751 F. App’x 368, 370 (4th Cir. 2018) 

(remanding to the BIA when the BIA opinion relied on a prior precedential BIA opinion 

interpreting the definition of a CIMT that had since been reversed by the court of 

appeals). 

The amendment does not change the date of filing, May 15, 2020. An amended 

opinion will be filed.

By the Court,

s/MARJORIE O. RENDELL

Circuit Judge

Dated: August 13, 2020

cc: All Counsel of Record
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roland Jones, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 565]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered March 16, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant’s claim that the arresting officer’s testimony that defendant fit a radioed description was insufficient to establish the legality of police conduct is unpreserved *(People v Cintron,*232 AD2d 192, *lv denied*89 NY2d 863), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that probable cause was sufficiently established through the arresting officer’s testimony as to the details of the description followed by his statement that defendant matched the description *(id.).*The record supports the court’s finding that defendant’s statement was spontaneous and not the product of police questioning. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Buckley, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Daniel A.Coccoluto, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omtool, Ltd.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

**b)[Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained inSEC Release 34-47986 and 33-8618.]**

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 7,2006
|   | By:    |  /s/ Daniel A.  Coccoluto |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |  Daniel A.  Coccoluto     |
|   |   |  Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
§ 312.605 Award. *Award* means an award of financial assistance by the Peace Corps or other Federal agency directly to a recipient. ( a ) The term award includes: ( 1 ) A Federal grant or cooperative agreement, in the form of money or property in lieu of money.
( 2 ) A block grant or a grant in an entitlement program, whether or not the grant is exempted from coverage under the Governmentwide rule [Agency-specific CFR citation] that implements OMB Circular A-102 (for availability, see 5 CFR 1310.3) and specifies uniform administrative requirements.
( b ) The term award does not include: ( 1 ) Technical assistance that provides services instead of money.
( 2 ) Loans.
( 3 ) Loan guarantees.
( 4 ) Interest subsidies.
( 5 ) Insurance.
( 6 ) Direct appropriations.
( 7 ) Veterans' benefits to individuals (*i.e.*, any benefit to veterans, their families, or survivors by virtue of the service of a veteran in the Armed Forces of the United States).
( c ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(2) of this section, this paragraph is not applicable for the Peace Corps.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Curtiss H. Crawford, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Judgment insofar as it imposes sentence unanimously reversed, on the law, and otherwise judgment affirmed, and matter remitted to Erie County Court for resentence in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance on two counts, to wit, sixth degree and seventh degree. At sentencing the court duly advised him that if he had a prior felony conviction he could admit, deny or stand mute with respect thereof; that if he admitted it, the court would sentence him accordingly, imposing a mandatory minimum sentence, and if he denied it or stood mute, the court would hear his contentions before sentence, with a possible adjournment to the District Attorney to present his proof thereon. The court stated that if it was found that he had a prior felony conviction, the sentence would be 1 Vi to 3 years. Defendant admitted his prior conviction, and was sentenced to *IVz*to 3 years. On this appeal defendant properly asserts that the sentence should be vacated and the matter should be remitted for resentencing because the District Attorney failed to comply with CPL 400.21 (subd 2). That section provides that whenever the People claim that a defendant has a prior felony conviction within the previous 10 years (Penal Law, § 70.06, subd 1, par [iv]), "a statement must be filed by the prosecutor before sentence is imposed setting forth the date and place of each alleged predicate felony conviction”. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court—attempted criminal possession controlled substance, sixth degree.) Present—Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.
#### § 903.7 Acknowledgment.

Each case received shall be acknowledged in writing by the executive secretary of the Board. If in the judgment of the executive secretary additional documentation or information is needed, he or she may request such materials.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vincent A. Ciffa, Appellant.

Application granted to appeal on judgment roll, typewritten briefs, and John J. Mahon, Esq., assigned as attorney to conduct appeal; appeal dismissed unless appellant’s brief is filed and served on or before August 9, 1962.
September 2, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Wlsec 

CONSULTANTS 

1427 Kensington Square Court 

Murfreesboro, TN 37130 

w wiserconsul:ants.com 

T 615-278-1500 

F 61S-217-8J3Q 

Re: Wiser Consultants, LLC's Petition for Exemption to Operate Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems 

Enclosed is Appendix A to Wiser's Petition for a 333 Exemption. This document is 

being submitted under separate cover due toj.>roprietary content that should not be 

released to the public without prior approval. 

FAA Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3703 

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER 

Wiser Consultants, LLC 

Attn: Cyrus W. Wiser, Jr. 

1427 Kensington Square Court 

Murfreesboro, TN 37130 

615.278.1500 

cwwiser@wiserco.com
### §3501a. Additional Assistant Secretaries

There shall be in the Department of Health and Human Services, in addition to the Assistant Secretaries now provided for by law, three additional Assistant Secretaries of Health and Human Services, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The provisions of section 2 of the Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1953 (67 Stat. 631) shall be applicable to such additional Assistant Secretaries to the same extent as they are applicable to the Assistant Secretaries authorized by that section.

(Pub. L. 89–115, §4(a), Aug. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 449; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Reorganization Plan Numbered 1 of 1953, referred to in text, is set out as a note under section 202 of this title.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 623h of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 1, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" and "Assistant Secretaries of Health and Human Services" substituted in text for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" and "Assistant Secretaries of Health, Education, and Welfare", respectively, pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs

Pub. L. 112–166, §2(e)(1), Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1284, provided that: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the appointment of an individual to serve as the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs within the Department of Health and Human Services shall not be subject to the advice and consent of the Senate."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-55,871]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on October 27, 2004 in response to a worker petition filed by International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers—Communications Workers of America, Local 249, on behalf of workers at Merrow Machine Company, Newington, Connecticut.

The Department issued a negative determination (TA-W-55,871) applicable to the petitioning group of workers on July 13, 2004. No new information or change in circumstances is evident which would result in a reversal of the Department's previous determination. Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of December, 2004.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 04-28038 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
ex10-3.htm


EXHIBIT 10.3







  





1











  






 







  





2











  











  





3











  











  





4











  











  





5











  











  





6











  











  





7











  











  





8











  











  





9











  









 10
### §2871. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–568, §8(a)(2), Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2428

Section, Pub. L. 88–452, title III, §321, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 525; Pub. L. 89–253, §30(c), Oct. 9, 1965, 79 Stat. 979; Pub. L. 89–794, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1465; Pub. L. 91–177, title I, §101(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 827; Pub. L. 92–424, §2(a), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 688; Pub. L. 93–644, §14(a), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2329, set forth provisions relating to duration of and authorization for appropriations for program.
#### Earl Douglas FIELDS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of D.O.C., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-6084.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2007.

Decided: May 2, 2007.

Earl Douglas Fields, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Earl Douglas Fields seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fields has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2551 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2551

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 175.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

 Mr. Langevin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pigment Yellow 175.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT YELLOW 175.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pigment Yellow 175) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```