alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. 
 Maple Corporate Services Limited 

P.O. Box 309, Ugland House 
 Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands 
 August 17, 2010 

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 
 7171 Southwest
Parkway, B100.4 
 Austin, TX 78735 

West Coast Hitech L.P. 
 P.O. Box 45005

 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 

Advanced Technology Investment Company 
 Mamoura
Building A 
 Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to: (a) that certain Master
Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2008, as amended, among Advanced Technology Investment Company (“Oyster”), West Coast Hitech L.P. (“Pearl”), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“Discovery”) and
GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc. (as successor to The Foundry Company, “FoundryCo”)(the “MTA”); and (b) that certain Funding Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2009 among Oyster, Discovery and FoundryCo, as amended on April 1,
2010 (the “Funding Agreement”). Capitalized terms used in this letter without definition herein have the meanings set forth in the MTA and the Funding Agreement, as the case may be. 

The Parties hereby agree as follows with respect to certain matters set forth below: 

Cash Reserve Requirement 

Pursuant to Section 2.02 of the Funding Agreement, the Parties have agreed that at all times during the term of the Funding
Agreement, the FoundryCo Group shall maintain Cash and Cash Equivalents in an amount equal to at least $850 million (the “Cash Reserve Requirement”). 
 The Parties hereby agree to amend the Cash Reserve Requirement as follows: 
 2.02.
Cash Reserve. The Parties agree that at all times during the term of the Funding Agreement, FoundryCo Group shall maintain Cash and Cash Equivalents in an amount equal to at least $500 million; provided, however, that this requirement
shall no longer apply upon the earlier of (i) FoundryCo entering into a Transition Period in accordance with Article VIII hereunder and (ii) the end of Phase II. 







 Miscellaneous Provisions 
 The miscellaneous provisions of Article XIV of the MTA are incorporated by reference herein. 
 Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by signing the counterpart of this letter in the signature block provided below. 

  
 2 









			
	Yours truly,
	
	GLOBALFOUNDRIES, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Bruce McDougall

	Name:	 	Bruce McDougall
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


 Signature
Page to Letter Agreement 







 Agreed and Acknowledged: 
 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENT COMPANY 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Ibrahim Ajami

	Name:	 	Ibrahim Ajami
	Title:	 	CEO

 Signature Page to Letter Agreement








 Agreed and Acknowledged: 
 WEST COAST HITECH L.P. 
 By: West Coast Hitech G.P., Ltd., its general partner 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Shahzad Ahmed Khan

	Name:	 	Shahzad Ahmed Khan
	Title:	 	Director

 Signature Page to Letter
Agreement 







 Agreed and Acknowledged: 
 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert J. Rivet

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	

 Signature Page to Letter Agreement
#### In the Matter of Carmen Vega, Petitioner, v Ruben Franco, as Chair of the New York City Housing Authority, et al., Respondents.

[717 NYS2d 61]

—Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority dated December 10, 1997, which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner’s public housing tenancy on the grounds that she violated the terms of a stipulation permanently excluding her son from the premises, and violated the terms of her tenancy by having a dog in the premises, unanimously annulled, without costs, the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Helen Freedman, J.], entered on or about May 11, 1999) granted, the matter remitted to the municipal respondent for proceedings consistent with this decision and order, and respondent directed to reinstate petitioner’s tenancy.

Contrary to the conclusion reached by respondent, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that petitioner violated the terms of a stipulation permanently excluding her son from the premises. Although petitioner’s son appeared at her apartment door on one occasion, there is no evidence that he actually entered it. Moreover, there is no evidence that he did so at petitioner’s invitation, request or with her acquiescence. Accordingly, it cannot be said that petitioner intentionally violated the terms of the stipulation (see, *Cardona v Franco,*267 AD2d 53).

To the extent that petitioner was found to have had a dog in violation of her tenancy, it is not contended that this violation, by itself, warranted the termination of petitioner’s tenancy. In view of this, this proceeding should be remitted to the municipal respondent for the imposition of an appropriate penalty, if any. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. Keith Kitchen, Chief Financial Officer of Intellisync Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: December 9, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ J. KEITH KITCHEN   
|J. Keith Kitchen       
|Chief Financial Officer
#### § 501.2 Eligibility for appointment as Foreign Service Officer.

Cross-reference: The regulations governing eligibility for appointment as a Foreign Service Officer are codified in part 11 of this title.
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 25671          Edition: 19          Edition Date: July 2011          Clear Dates: NM - 10/1/2011     LNM - 9/13/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kroll Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael G. Cherkasky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Michael G. Cherkasky
--------------------------
Michael G. Cherkasky
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
#### In the Matter of Lillian Sandow, Also Known as Lillian Zuckerman, Deceased. Irving Zuckerman et al.; Ethel Rothman.

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points upon the attorney for the respondent, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original record, with this court on or before December 31, 1960, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur—Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
### §6250. Establishment

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Secretary may establish, maintain, and operate in the Northeast a Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve. A Reserve established under this part is not a component of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve established under part B of this subchapter. A Reserve established under this part shall contain no more than 2 million barrels of petroleum distillate.

(b) For the purposes of this part—

(1) the term "Northeast" means the States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey;

(2) the term "petroleum distillate" includes heating oil and diesel fuel; and

(3) the term "Reserve" means the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve established under this part.

(Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §181, as added Pub. L. 106–469, title II, §201(a)(3), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2034.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 94–163, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 871, known as the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6201 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 181 of Pub. L. 94–163 was renumbered section 191 and was classified to section 6251 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–58.
October 15, 2015

Mr. Carl H. Gregory, Jr.

P.O. Box 181411

Coronado, CA 92178

Dear Mr. Gregory:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your July 1, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA-2015-2657, but 

we are unable to process your request any further as a result of a discrepancy in your petition. 

The name of the petitioner is inconsistent in your petition. For us to consider the request any 

further, you must clarify the name of the petitioner and resubmit a revised petition to your 

docket. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, you may call the 333 Information Line at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
§ 72.7 Consular responsibility. ( a ) A consular officer has no authority to create Department or personal financial obligations in connection with the disposition of the remains of a United States citizen or non-citizen national who dies abroad. Responsibility for the disposition of the remains and all related costs (including but not limited to costs of embalming or cremation, burial expenses, cost of a burial plot or receptacle for ashes, markers, and grave upkeep), rests with the legal representative of the deceased. In the absence of a legal representative (including when the next of kin is not a legal representative), the consular officer should ask the next of kin to provide funds and instructions for disposition of remains. If the consular officer cannot locate a legal representative or next of kin, the consular officer may ask friends or other interested parties to provide the funds and instructions.
( b ) Arrangements for the disposition of remains must be consistent with the law and regulations of the host country and any relevant United States laws and regulations. Local law may, for example, require an autopsy, forbid cremation, require burial within a certain period of time, or specify who has the legal authority to make arrangements for the disposition of remains.
( c ) If funds are not available for the disposition of the remains within the period provided by local law for the interment or preservation of dead bodies, the remains must be disposed of by the local authorities in accordance with local law or regulations.
#### Charles M. ROBINSON v. Hon. Henley T. GRAVES.

No. 06-5037.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted For Possible Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) May 17, 2007.

Filed May 31, 2007.

Charles M. Robinson, Smyrna, DE, pro se.

BEFORE: BARRY, AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Charles Robinson appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because we determine that the appeal is lacking in arguable legal merit, we will dismiss it under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

According to Robinson’s complaint, in 2001 the Honorable Henry Graves, the defendant in this suit, presided over criminal proceedings involving Robinson. In September 2003, Robinson threatened to kill Judge Graves as well as his family. Despite the threat, Judge Graves continued to preside over the case and render decisions affecting Robinson’s sentence, rejecting a motion to correct his sentence. Robinson appealed the denial of his motion arguing that Judge Graves was biased and that he was acting as a judge in a case that he had a personal interest in and should, therefore, be recused. The Delaware Supreme Court found no error.

Robinson then filed a pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware seeking to remove Judge Graves from his case. The District Court, after granting Robinson’s motion to proceed *in forma pauperis,*dismissed his complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B) based on judicial immunity.

We have appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Having granted Rob*82inson leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*on appeal, we now determine whether his appeal should be dismissed pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B). An appeal must be dismissed if it has no arguable basis in law or fact. § 1915(e)(2)(B); *Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

In 1996, Congress amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to provide that “injunctive relief shall not be granted” in an action brought against “a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity ... unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.” *Bolin v. Story,*225 F.3d 1234, 1242 (11th Cir.2000) Robinson complains of actions taken by Judge Graves in his official capacity, no declaratory decree was involved, and he cannot demonstrate that declaratory relief is unavailable. Because his appeal lacks merit, we will dismiss it under § 1915(e)(2)(B).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2536 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2536

         To extend the suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

Mr. Frelinghuysen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-HEXYLRESORCINOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-Hexylresorcinol) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas MacLeod, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2019-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.               Iam responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted inpreparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.               Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance withItem 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I havereasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
#### E. N. Duerlein, trading as E. N. Duerlein & Company, appellee, v. Robert Nordin, appellant.

Gen. No. 27,755.

Suit on oral contract for broker’s commission for procuring tenant. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 9, 1923.

Edelson & Paullin, for appellant; Hyland J. Paullin, of counsel. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2591 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain yarn (other than sewing thread) 

of synthetic staple fibers, not put up for retail sale. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain yarn (other 

than sewing thread) of synthetic staple fibers, not put 

up for retail sale. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN YARN (OTHER THAN SEWING 

4 THREAD) OF SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBERS, 

5 NOT PUT UP FOR RETAIL SALE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 
2 

•HR 2591 IH 

‘‘ 9902.55.01 Yarn (other than sewing 

thread) of synthetic staple 

fibers, not put up for retail 

sale containing 85 percent or 

more by weight of acrylic or 

modacrylic staple fibers single yarn (provided for in 

subheading 5509.31.00) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TYREE DESHANE HOLMES,

Petitioner

v.

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

LANCASTER COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 31 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of May , 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED

, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.