alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey M., and Larry U., Appellants.

Appeal by defendants from two judgments (one as to each of them) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered April 12, 1976, convicting them of reckless endangerment in the first degree, endangering the welfare of a child and menacing, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by granting defendants’ applications for youthful offender treatment. As so modified, judgments affirmed and cases remitted to Crimi*1025nal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Under the circumstances presented, including the defendants’ exemplary backgrounds and the favorable probation report, it was an abuse of discretion not to accord them youthful offender treatment. Defendants’ other contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Latham, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
Opinion issued October 31 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00491
- CV

——————————— ROY J. ELIZONDO, III AND ROY J. ELIZONDO III, PLLC , Appella nt s V. CADENCE BANK , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2014
- 65226

MEMORANDU M OPINION The parties have filed an agreed motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justice s Goodman, Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra

.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Woodson Hobbs, President and Chief Executive Officer of Intellisync Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 19, 2004



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/s/ WOODSON HOBBS                                  
|                                                   
|Woodson Hobbs President and Chief Executive
Officer
### §5186. Emergency public transportation

The President is authorized to provide temporary public transportation service in an area affected by a major disaster to meet emergency needs and to provide transportation to governmental offices, supply centers, stores, post offices, schools, major employment centers, and such other places as may be necessary in order to enable the community to resume its normal pattern of life as soon as possible.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §419, formerly §416, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 158; renumbered §419, Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §106(j), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 419 of Pub. L. 93–288 was classified to section 5189 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–707.
1

C 08-4259 MMC 

Charlotte Yee 

39120 Argonaut Way, 305 

Fremont, CA 94538 

(510) 661-0467 (phone) 

Plaintiff, Pro Se 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO HEADQUARTERS 

CHARLOTTE YEE, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

)

 ) 

)

HILDA SOLIS. SECRETARY OF ) 

LABOR, ) 

 )

 Agency. ) 

)

3:08-cv-04259 MMC

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONVERT A 

JURY TRIAL DEMAND TO BENCH TRIAL; 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 Following a failed attempt at settlement today, the Plaintiff places her faith in the court as a 

fair arbiter of both fact and law. Ergo, in deference to court efficiency, she hereby requests that 

remaining disputed facts in the case be heard before Her Honor rather than by jury. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: March 29, 2010 __________/S/________________ 

 Plaintiff, Charlotte Yee 

///

///

///

Case 3:08-cv-04259-MMC Document 204 Filed 04/19/10 Page 1 of 2
Yee v. Department of Labor

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Civil Case 08-04259 is scheduled for hearing as a bench trial. 

Dated: _______________ __________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 19, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-04259-MMC Document 204 Filed 04/19/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2610

To suspend temporarily the duty on Mefenoxam Technical. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005

Mr. TERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Mefenoxam Technical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MEFENOXAM TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.90.14 Mefenoxam Technical - 

(R,S)–2-[(2,6-

dimethylphenyl]-

methoxyacetylamino]-propionic acid methyl ester (CAS 

Nos. 70630–17–0 and 

69516–34–3) (provided for 

in subheading 2924.29.47) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2

•HR 2610 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32(ii)



Certification



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF ATMOSPHERIC GLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                    
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 10, 2005 |  |                                                    
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Thomas W. Reddoch                              
|                        |  | Thomas W. Reddoch, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: February 10, 2005 |  |                                                    
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Sharon L. Draper                               
|                        |  | Sharon L. Draper, Chief Accounting Officer         



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificate is being furnished solely for
purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

 v.

DOUGLAS R. CARAWAY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

No. C-08-4371 MMC

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT

On November 18, 2011, the Court entered judgment against defendant Douglas

Caraway (“Caraway”) in the amount of $181,634.35. (See Amended Judgment and Decree

of Sale, filed Nov. 18, 2011.) To satisfy said judgment, the Court authorized the

government to sell Caraway’s property located at 734 Neal Avenue in San Carlos,

California, and directed the government to “choose either the United States Marshal or a

PALS [Internal Revenue Service Property Appraisal and Liquidation Specialist]” to conduct

the sale. (See id.)

Now before the Court is Caraway’s letter, filed March 2, 2016, by which Caraway

requests leave to conduct a “private sale” of the property. Specifically, Caraway contends

the property would sell for a higher price if he were allowed to conduct the sale himself. In

Case 3:08-cv-04371-MMC Document 162 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

support of his request, Caraway relies on letters he recently received from his realtor and

his physician. 

The Court construes Caraway’s letter as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant

to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So construed, the motion is denied,

as it fails to state a cognizable ground for such relief. Even assuming the letters from

Caraway’s realtor and physician could be considered newly discovered evidence under

Rule 60(b)(2), the motion is time-barred. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1) (providing “motion

under Rule 60(b)[(2)] must be made . . . no more than a year after the entry of the

judgment”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 8, 2016 

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04371-MMC Document 162 Filed 03/08/16 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28014]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and the District of Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, January 18, 2005, from 1:30 
p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, January 18, 2005 from 1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET via a telephone 
conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written 
statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. 
De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, 
Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-
1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: December 17, 2004.
Bernard Coston,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 04-28014 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Morris L. Alexander, Doing Business as Auto Engraver Company, Respondent, v. Accmatool Co. Inc. et al., Appellants.

Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Shientag, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27958]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Research 
Program Projects (PO1).
    Date: January 11, 2005.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Yan Z Wang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal 
and Skin Diseases, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 820, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-4957.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 15, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-27958 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**CARLOS QUILES,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON OF PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 85 EM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Application f or Leave to File** 

**Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are**  DISMISSED

**.** See

Commonwealth v. Ali **, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (stating that hybrid represe ntation is not** 

**permitted). The Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to forward the filings to counsel of record.**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2166/013229-0143 

962273.02 a03/05/10 -1- 

Case No. CV-08-4232 JL 

JOINT STIPULATION TO SCHEDULE 

FURTHER CMC 

Ernest W. Klatte, III (State Bar No. 115914) 

eklatte@rutan.com 

Summer Young Agriesti (State Bar No. 232883) 

syoung@rutan.com 

RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 

611 Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth Floor 

Costa Mesa, California 92626-1931 

Telephone: 714-641-5100 

Facsimile: 714-546-9035 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BFS RETAIL & COMMERCIAL OPERATIONS, 

LLC 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

MEHDI SABERI, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

BFS RETAIL & COMMERCIAL 

OPERATIONS, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. C-08-4232 JL 

JOINT STIPULATION TO SCHEDULE 

POST-MEDIATION CMC

Date Action Filed: September 8, 2008 

Trial Date: July 19, 2010 

WHEREAS, the Amended Pretrial Order filed February 22, 1010 required the 

parties to jointly propose a date for a post-mediation Case Management Conference on a 

Wednesday at 10:30 a.m. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby jointly stipulate and agree as follows: 

The parties have agreed to schedule a further post-mediation Case Management 

Conference at 10:30 on March 31, 2010, the same date that Defendant’s Motion to Compel 

a Mental Examination is scheduled to be heard. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 3:08-cv-04232-JL Document 59 Filed 03/09/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04232-JL Document58 Filed03/05/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2166/013229-0143 

962273.02 a03/05/10 -2- 

Case No. CV-08-4232 JL 

JOINT STIPULATION TO SCHEDULE 

FURTHER CMC 

Dated: March 5, 2010 RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP 

By: /s/ 

Summer Young Agriesti 

Attorneys for Defendant 

BFS RETAIL & COMMERCIAL 

OPERATIONS, LLC 

Dated: March 5, 2010 GCA LAW GROUP, LLP 

By: /s/ 

Kimberly A. Donovan 

Attorneys for Dana Girard 

Dated: March 5, 2010 CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP 

By: /s/ 

Harry Lewis 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Mehdi Saberi 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

By: 

James Larson 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-04232-JL Document 59 Filed 03/09/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04232-JL Document58 Filed03/05/10 Page2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 65

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 65 appear at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999.

#### § 65.2 Applications.

Applications for citizens of the other American republics to receive the instruction contemplated by the Act of June 24, 1938, shall be made formally through diplomatic channels to the Secretary of State of the Department of State by the foreign governments concerned.
#### In the Matter of Davlee Construction Corp., Respondent, v. Leonard L. Horn et al., Constituting the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, Appellants, and Earl H. Willets, as Building Inspector of the Town of Huntington, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act: (1) to review and annul a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington, which sustained the decision of the town’s Building Inspector denying the petitioner’s application for a building permit; and (2) to direct said building inspector to issue such permit, the said board appeals from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 9,-1961, as annulled the board’s said determination and directed it to issue the building permit sought by petitioner. Upon this appeal, the said board also brings up for review: (a) a first intermediate order of the same court, dated January 15, 1959, which denied the board’s motion to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency; and (b) a second intermediate order of the same court, dated April 17, 1959, which denied the board’s application for leave to appeal from the first order. Final order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs; first intermediate order affirmed, without costs; appeal from second order dismissed as academic. In our opinion, the Justice at Special Term, who made the first intermediate order denying the *974motion to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency, correctly ruled that, as to the subject premises, the original judgment of December 14, 1955 rendered by Official Referee Hooley in an action for a declaratory judgment (wherein the Referee held, *inter alia,*that the zoning amendment adopted by the Town of Huntington on May 4, 1954 was unconstitutional and void), was *res judicata*with respect to the subsequent zoning amendment of December 20, 1955, and that such judgment remained and continued to be *res judicata*until and unless it be established that there is a change in the conditions found to have existed with respect to the amendment of May 4, 1954 *(Matter of Davlee Constr. Corp.*v. *Brooks,*21 Misc 2d 137). We also agree with the holding of the Justice at Special Term, before whom the issues herein were tried, that the evidence adduced at the trial did not establish such a significant change of the conditions in relation to the subject premises as to render the amendment of December 20, 1955 more appropriate and satisfactory, in point of constitutionality, than was its predecessor of May 4, 1954 *(Matter of Davlee Constr. Corp.*v. *Brooks,*26 Misc 2d 240). In these circumstances, the Board of Appeals was not warranted in denying the building- permit sought by petitioner. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 35.1



Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services,
Inc.



This Annual Statement as to Compliance
is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 16, 2019 (the “Agreement”)
and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust
2019-4 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution
and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp.
in connection therewith. The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.



The undersigned certifies
that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer. I further certify as
follows:



| | 1. | I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during
the preceding period from October 16, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and its performance under the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any
such obligation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.



|By: | /s/ Connie Coffey                       |  | Dated:  March 6, 2020
|--- | --------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|    | Connie Coffey                           |  |                      
|    | Executive Vice President, Corporate     |  |                      
|    | Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |  |
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Oliver Boddie, Appellant, v. Robert E. Murphy, as Warden of Auburn Prison, Respondent.

Richard A. Gleason, Esq., assigned as counsel to conduct appeal for appellant in place and stead of Burke N. Carson, Esq.