alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DR. MAMTA PATEL, individually, YATIN PATEL, individually, 

STAMFORD DENTAL SPA, P.C., MANCHESTER SMILES FAMILY AND 

IMPLANTS DENTISTRY, LLC, CT SMILES DENTISTRY, P.C., f/k/a CT 

SMILES TERRITORY DEVELOPER, LLC, and PARKWAY DENTAL 

HAMDEN, P.C.,

Appellant,

v.

TRALONGO, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1156

[June 17, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carol Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17-

001178 (25).

John Strohsahl and Bradford J. Beilly of Beilly and Strohsahl, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Robert M. Einhorn and Beshoy Rizk of Zarco Einhorn Salkowski & 

Brito, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, KUNTZ, and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
SO OE

| Bairoil

/
|

-

— Wamsutter : |
19

Public lands that may have Qs 10 20 30 40 50 hat
= potential for disposal or transfer ———————————— Map 2 27
Kilometers . .
P Potential Disposals -
rl Sweetwater County
les

Alternatives 2 & 4

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lason,
Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, each of the undersigned hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of our respective knowledge and
belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lason, Inc. for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Lason, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lason, Inc.

The foregoing Certification is subject to and qualified by the disclosure in
Part 1, Item 2 which provides that while the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements of registrant included in this quarterly report have been
prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles for
interim financial information, they are not in conformity with the instructions
for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulations S-X, as registrant has not
presented comparable information for the three and six month periods ending
June 30, 2002. Reference is made to Part 1, Item 2: Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  Fresh Start
Reporting and Factors that Affect Comparability of Financial Information for a
more complete discussion.

|                |  |     |  |                                           
|--------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ |  | Ronald D. Risher                          
|                |  |    
|                |  |     |  | Ronald D. Risher
Chief Executive Officer  
|               
|               
|August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ |  | Douglas S. Kearney                        
|                |  |    
|                |  |     |  | Douglas S. Kearney
Chief Financial Officer

23
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11197 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ROMAR BERNARD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 28

- 1

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Romar Bernard has moved for l eave

to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California

,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Bernard h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 22, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11197 Document: 00514247322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2017No. 16

- 11197

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from f urther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-11197 Document: 00514247322 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brantley Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert P. Pinkas, Chief Executive Officer of Brantley Capital Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                           /S/ ROBERT P. PINKAS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert P. Pinkas
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           May 17, 2004
Presidential Documents

76587

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 244

Tuesday, December 21, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2005–11 of December 10, 2004

Renewal of Trade Agreement with the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam 

Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative 

Pursuant to my authority under subsection 405(b)(1)(B) of the Trade Act 

of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2435(b)(1)(B)), I have determined that actual or foreseeable 

reductions in U.S. tariffs and nontariff barriers to trade resulting from multilateral negotiations are being satisfactorily reciprocated by the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. I have further found that a satisfactory balance of concessions in trade and services has been maintained during the life of the 

Agreement on Trade Relations between the United States of America and 

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal 

[FR Doc. 04–28027

Filed 12–20–04; 9:22 am] 

Billing code 3190–W5–P 

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 10, 2004. 

.

W
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2501 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2501

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2-
    chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-imethyl-, (2-methyl(1,1'-
                   biphenyl)-3-yl)methyl ester, (z)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2005

 Mr. McCrery introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Cyclopropanecarboxylic acid, 3-(2-
    chloro-3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-imethyl-, (2-methyl(1,1'-
                   biphenyl)-3-yl)methyl ester, (z)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPROPANECARBOXYLIC ACID, 3-(2-CHLORO-3,3,3-TRIFLUORO-1-
              PROPENYL)-2,2-IMETHYL-, (2-METHYL(1,1'-BIPHENYL)-3-
              YL)METHYL ESTER, (Z)-.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.08.11       Cyclopropanecarbo  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         xylic acid, 3-(2-                                                  31/2008
                         chloro-3,3,3-
                         trifluoro-1-
                         propenyl)-2,2-
                         imethyl-, (2-
                         methyl(1,1-
                         biphenyl)-3-
                         yl)methyl ester,
                         (z)- (CAS No.
                         82657-04-3)
                         (provided in
                         subheading
                         3808.10.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32(ii)



Certification



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND INTERIM CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
OF ATMOSPHERIC GLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds knowledge:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |     |                                                              | 
|------------------------ |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Date:  February 13, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ W. Scott McDonald                                        | 
|                         |  |     | W. Scott McDonald                                            | 
|                         |  |     | Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document TiUe: P/^C^Jo*^^ ^ -f* ^^ ^^C^-di^Sfii^-^'\*'^^ \/^ i c- ^ AjL^> ^ 

RIN: -2^/ 0 r - A'^^S " '''''* ^ 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E,0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

— The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of hiformation and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

_^^ ^ No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

^^^ ^ The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

___^^ This document is not a final rule. 

^__ ^ This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

^ The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

Signature 

Name 

Title/Office 

Date
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Willard Jackson, Appellant.

Motion for leave to prosecute appeal as a poor person and for assignment of counsel. Motion denied. Present — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.
April 22, 2016

Andrew Pierce, ASI

AFS-250, FAA

Room 831 

800 Independence Ave. SW

Washington, DC 20591

202-267-8238

TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc. would like to withdrawal its duplicated petition for exemption posted to 

the docket on 3/02/2016, TEMSCO would like for you to precede with the petition submitted on 

05/20/2015.

Sincerely,

TEMSCO Helicopters, Inc.

Joseph R. Hicks 

Director of Operations

907-225-5141
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76963-76964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28108]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster P077]

State of Alaska (Amendment 2)

    In accordance with a notice received from the Department of 
Homeland Security--Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective 
December 9, 2004, the above numbered Public Assistance declaration is 
hereby amended to reestablish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning on October 18, 2004, and continuing through and including 
October 24, 2004.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing

[[Page 76964]]

applications for physical damage is January 14, 2005.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59008).

    Dated: December 16, 2004.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 04-28108 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
(logo) CohnReznick

Advisory ∙ Assurance ∙ Tax

 

CohnReznick LLP

cohnreznick.com

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To CWCapital Asset ManagementLLC

 

We have examined management ofCWCapital Asset Management LLC ("CWCAM")'s assertion that CWCAMcomplied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")'s Regulation AB for thecommercial mortgage-backed securitization trusts included in the accompanyingManagement's Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2019. CWCAM's management is responsible for itsassertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management'sassertion about CWCAM's compliance with the specified requirements based on ourexamination.

 

Management has determined thatthe criteria set forth in Sections 1122 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(B),(d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(3)(i)(D), (d)(3)(ii), (d)(3)(iii), (d)(3)(iv), (d)(4)(v),(d)(4)(ix), (d)(4)(x), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), (d)(4)(xiv), and(d)(4)(xv) are not applicable to the activities performed by CWCAM, as aspecial servicer, with respect to CWCAM's Platform. The commercialmortgage-backed securities transactions covered by this Platform are thosespecified in Appendix B in the accompanying Management's Assertion onCompliance with Regulation AB Criteria.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that weplan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whethermanagement's assertion about compliance with the specified requirements isfairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performingprocedures to obtain evidence about whether management's assertion is fairlystated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of theprocedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of therisks of material misstatement of management's assertion, whether due to fraudor error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on CWCAM's compliance with the specifiedrequirements.

 

In our opinion, management'sassertion that CWCAM complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item1122(d) of the U.S. SEC's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backedsecuritization trusts included in the accompanying Management's Assertion onCompliance with Regulation AB Criteria is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/ CohnReznick LLP

 

Bethesda, Maryland

February 25, 2020

(Except for Assertion 3 on theManagement’s Assertion on

Compliance with Regulation ABCriteria for which is dated

March 23, 2020)
#### § 35.44 Right to administrative offset.

The amount of any penalty or assessment which has become final, or for which a judgment has been entered under § 35.42 or § 35.43, or any amount agreed upon in a compromise or settlement under § 35.46, may be collected by administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, except that an administrative offset may not be made under this subsection against a refund of an overpayment of federal taxes, then or later owing by the United States to the defendant.
### §300gg–19b. Information on prescription drugs

#### (a) In general

A group health plan or a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall—

(1) not restrict, directly or indirectly, any pharmacy that dispenses a prescription drug to an enrollee in the plan or coverage from informing (or penalize such pharmacy for informing) an enrollee of any differential between the enrollee's out-of-pocket cost under the plan or coverage with respect to acquisition of the drug and the amount an individual would pay for acquisition of the drug without using any health plan or health insurance coverage; and

(2) ensure that any entity that provides pharmacy benefits management services under a contract with any such health plan or health insurance coverage does not, with respect to such plan or coverage, restrict, directly or indirectly, a pharmacy that dispenses a prescription drug from informing (or penalize such pharmacy for informing) an enrollee of any differential between the enrollee's out-of-pocket cost under the plan or coverage with respect to acquisition of the drug and the amount an individual would pay for acquisition of the drug without using any health plan or health insurance coverage.

#### (b) Definition

For purposes of this section, the term "out-of-pocket cost", with respect to acquisition of a drug, means the amount to be paid by the enrollee under the plan or coverage, including any cost-sharing (including any deductible, copayment, or coinsurance) and, as determined by the Secretary, any other expenditure.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2729, as added Pub. L. 115–263, §2, Oct. 10, 2018, 132 Stat. 3672.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OCULUS INNOVATIVE SCIENCES,

INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PRODINNV,S.A. DE C.V. and

CESAR MANGOTICH PACHECHO,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C 08-4707 BZ

ORDER CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Following a Case Management Conference attended by

plaintiff’s counsel only, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Case Management Conference is continued until

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2010 at 4:00 p.m., in Courtroom G, 15th

Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California 94102.

2. Defendants are ORDERED to file either a consent or

declination to magistrate judge jurisdiction by JANUARY 29,

2010. The form to consent to or decline magistrate judge

jurisdiction may be found on the court’s website at:

http://www.cand.uscourts.gov

Case 3:08-cv-04707-MMC Document 28 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3. If defendants consent, they must file a separate or

joint pretrial statement by FEBRUARY 1, 2010

Dated: January 5, 2010

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\OCULUS\ORDER CONTINUING CMC2.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04707-MMC Document 28 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Corrine C. Waterman v. Henry Kaufman et al. (Two Actions.)

Motion for resettlement denied in all respects. Motion for “ a final order and judgment, on further review and resettlement, on all matters embraced in three appeals before this court” denied in all respects.
#### Wanda Tomarkin, Respondent, v. Vitron Research Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Third-Party Plaintiff. L. W. Tomarkin, Third-Party Defendant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.
1

APPENDIX D 

Fire Location Maps 

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

 - Presidential Declaration FEMA-EM-3287-CA maps 

State of California Office of Emergency Services 

 – California Wildfires – FEMA EM -3287-CA 

 - Statewide Fire Maps 

USDA Forest Service 

 - Region 5 Fire and Aviation GIS Lab, California Wildfires, July 1, 

 2008 

 – Maps of Current Large Incidents 
2

Federal Emergency Management Agency 

[www.fema.gov] 
3
4

State of California - Statewide Fire Maps 

 [http://www.fire.ca.gov/index_incidents_overview.php/] 
5

JUNE 2008 
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

JULY 2008
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42

AUGUST 2008

Were not longer updated on a daily basis in August 2008 
43
44
45
46
47
48

USDA Forest Service – California Fires, July 1, 2008 

Region 5 Fire and Aviation GIS Lab 
49

USDA Forest Service – MODIS Active Fire Mapping Program 

Current Large Incidents 

[http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/] 

JUNE 2008 
50
51
52
53
54
55
56

JULY 2008 
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

AUGUST 2008 

 
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to May 12, 2020)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.