STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA 

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS 

FILED 

November 20, 2013 

RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK 

SHAWN D. BURNS, 

Claimant Below, Petitioner SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS 

OF WEST VIRGINIA 

vs.) No. 12-0266 (BOR Appeal No. 2046252) 

(Claim No. 2011010175) 

CHEDDAR’S OPERATIONS, LLC, 

Employer Below, Respondent 

MEMORANDUM DECISION 

Petitioner Shawn D. Burns, by Christopher J. Wallace, his attorney, appeals the decision 

of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Cheddar’s Operations, LLC, by 

Lynn C. Photiadis, its attorney, filed a timely response. 

This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated February 21, 2012, in 

which the Board affirmed an August 12, 2011, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of 

Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s October 18, 2010, 

Order denying Mr. Burns’s application for workers’ compensation benefits. The Court has 

carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and 

the case is mature for consideration. 

This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal 

arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided 

by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record 

presented, the Court finds that the Board of Review’s decision was clearly the result of an 

erroneous conclusion of law. This case satisfies the “limited circumstances” requirement of Rule 

21(d) of the Revised Rules of Appellate Procedure and is appropriate for a memorandum 

decision rather than an opinion. 

On September 18, 2010, Mr. Burns was employed as a dishwasher by Cheddar’s 

Operations, LLC, when he sustained injuries after he tripped and fell over either a drain or dishes 

in the floor. The claims administrator rejected Mr. Burns’s claim on the grounds that the 

evidence did not support that an injury had occurred in the course of and as a result of his 

employment. The Office of Judges concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prove that 

Mr. Burns sustained a compensable injury on September 18, 2010. Mr. Burns disagrees and 

asserts that his emergency room records show by a preponderance of the evidence that he was 

diagnosed with conditions of the right hip, right ankle, lumbar spine, thoracic spine, and cervical 

spine. 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The evidence of record shows that on September 18, 2010, Jon Ketron, Mr. Burns’s 

manager, prepared a statement, in which he stated that he heard a crash in the dish room and then 

found Mr. Burns lying on the floor with a couple of pans laying on his ankle. Another manager, 

Amber Vaughn, provided the same information in an accident report; she heard a crash and then 

found Mr. Burns lying on the floor with dishes on him. Mr. Burns sought medical treatment at 

Trinity Medical Center on September 19, 2010, and the records indicated an impression of right 

hip sprain, right ankle sprain, lumbar sprain, thoracic sprain, and cervical sprain. Mr. Burns’s 

ankle was put in an air cast. On March 25, 2011, Dr. Hennessey conducted an independent 

medical exam on Mr. Burns and opined that Mr. Burns had made a full recovery from his soft 

tissue injuries, but that a cervical MRI would be reasonable. On January 26, 2011, Dr. 

MacPherson testified at deposition that Mr. Burns’s x-rays from September 19, 2010, showed 

degenerative spondylitic changes throughout the cervical spine, degenerative changes in the right 

hip, mild degenerative spondylitic changes of the dorsal spine, and no evidence of any acute 

injuries. The Office of Judges relied on Dr. MacPherson’s testimony that Mr. Burns was able to 

attend two fifty minute classes per day and that he failed to produce any direct evidence 

indicating that he had sustained an injury. The Board of Review adopted the findings of the 

Office of Judges and affirmed its Order. 

For Mr. Burns’s claim to be held compensable under West Virginia Code § 23-4-1(a), he 

must show (1) a personal injury; (2) received in the course of his employment; and (3) resulting 

from the employment. Mr. Burns was employed as a dishwasher in a restaurant and was found 

lying in the kitchen floor with pans on him after a loud crash was heard by his managers. Mr. 

Burns sought medical treatment at Trinity Medical Center the following day and was diagnosed 

with right hip sprain, right ankle sprain, lumbar sprain, thoracic sprain, and cervical sprain and 

his ankle was placed in an air cast. Dr. Hennessey in an independent medical exam opined that 

Mr. Burns had made a full recovery from his soft tissue injuries but that a cervical MRI would be 

reasonable. This evidence is sufficient to conclude that Mr. Burns was injured while performing 

his duties in the course of his employment. 

For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review was clearly 

the result of an erroneous conclusion of law. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is 

reversed and remanded with a finding of compensability. 

Reverse and Remand. 

2 
 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSUED: November 20, 2013 

CONCURRED IN BY: 

Justice Robin J. Davis 

Justice Margaret L. Workman 

Justice Allen H. Loughry II 

DISSENTING: 

Chief Justice Brent D. Benjamin 

Justice Menis E. Ketchum 

3