alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

ALBERTO GODINEZ-GALARZA, CR 09-0880 JSW 1

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332)

United States Attorney

BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)

Chief, Criminal Division

PATRICIA SPALETTA (CABN 156788)

Special Assistant United States Attorney

450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055

San Francisco, California 94102

Telephone: (415) 552-6031

Facsimile: (415) 436-7234

 Patricia.Spaletta@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALBERTO GODINEZ-GALARZA,

Defendant.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 09-0880 JSW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EXCLUDING TIME UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161

On February 18, 2010, the parties in this case appeared before the Court at a status

hearing. The Court continued the matter to March 25, 2010. The parties agreed to an exclusion

of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, from February 18, 2010 to March 25,

2010, in light of the need for defense counsel to receive and review discovery and to conduct

further investigation.

Case 3:09-cr-00880-JSW Document 28 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:09-cr-00880-JSW Document27 Filed02/23/10 Page1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXCLUDING TIME

ALBERTO GODINEZ-GALARZA, CR 09-0880 JSW 2

SO STIPULATED:

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO 

United States Attorney

DATED: February 22, 2010 /s/ 

PATRICIA SPALETTA

Special Assistant United States Attorney 

DATED: February 22, 2009 /s/ 

RONALD TYLER

Assistant Federal Public Defender

Based upon the representation of counsel and for good cause shown, the Court finds that

failing to exclude the time from February 18, 2010 to March 25, 2010 would unreasonably deny

the defendant and his counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into

account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds

that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from February 18, 2010 to March 25, 2010

from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time from February

18, 2010 to March 25, 2010 shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED:______________ _____________________________________

THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Court Judge 

Case3:09-cr-00880-JSW Document27 Filed02/23/10 Page2 of 2

February 23, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-00880-JSW Document 28 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2
### \fPA~f~~~

### ~tt,Mret~~ 

### M**MC~** f2M,v..-**12~ ~** 

l7 \AI

, -;)-._k /**~** I L

### ~~)

Jc 

## k

CAJMJ_ -1-

### ~**~ £(** **~** {

### ~th-**~ ~** **~ ,M~~~~~~hi-W~~** **·** 

### of

### ~ lw-v ;W4-WVl- -}o

### ~**~ ~**  a-rJ )

### ~~**~ ~** **~~~~~~T ·** 

### 9)~~~QM_~~~~1M 

# 1 {o**~** CD )-**~ ~** **~** 

### -f4T ;,._**~** ctwt_**~,**

### ~M~~~b.~~~**J.~ ~**  

# r**~ ~** **13-te. -te-~,** **~** 

### ;,_

..**4~~J ~** **~.hA"- ~~**  18o ' .J.**/M~ 5~~** **D"'~J'ffoi.**

### ~**M~** 

### -1**~** 

# f1A

rAA

### ~ o(

### ~**~ ~** **~ ~r~~)M_~-fk.-~~-** 

### r~~~kf~**t·~ ~~.** **(\~~~~~** LN'M-evUL..**~~7 ~**  

# r-**~ ~** **~** V>_ ''/J-C4Nt"**~** >NL**~ ~** **~ ~~MF** **,**

## f~~~~~~~~**~~aM~~~~~~h~**

### ~r**·**
### §3789. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3789 was editorially reclassified as section 10227 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3789, Pub. L. 90–351, title I, §811, as added Pub. L. 96–157, §2, Dec. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 1205, authorized use of available services, prior to repeal by section 609B(e) of Pub. L. 98–473. See section 10226(b) of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4083 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to extend funding for familyto-family health information centers to help families of children with 

disabilities or special health care needs make informed choices about 

health care for their children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2012 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. LANGEVIN, Ms. NORTON, Ms. PINGREE of 

Maine, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. MICHAUD, and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to extend funding for family-to-family health information centers to 

help families of children with disabilities or special health 

care needs make informed choices about health care for 

their children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4083 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FUNDING FOR FAMILY-TO-FAM2 ILY HEALTH INFORMATION CENTERS. 

3 Section 501(c)(1)(A)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 701(c)(1)(A)(iii)) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
exhibit1035.htm


Exhibit 10.35


 


Supplemental Agreement of Loan Agreement








Party A:  Shandong Longkong Travel Development Co., Ltd


 




Party B: Yishui Underground Fluorescent Lake Travel Development Co., Ltd








1. Considering the strategic cooperation relation, both parties reach this agreement through consultations; Both Parties agree that: Till to the date of 26-12-2009, all the loans in total amount of 5,620,000.00 (in words RMB Five Million Six Hundred and Twenty-two Thousand Yuan) which Provided by Party A to Party B, the expiration date shall be extended to the date of 25-12-2010; Party B shall get the fund ready as to repay the above loans on time; if any loan term is needed, shall be resolved through consultations.


 





2. The loan which Party A provided to Party B before, shall not be charged the interest; the interest already collected by Party A shall not be returned to Party B.


 





3.  This contract is made out in 2 duplicates, each for both parties; and it shall be effective immediately as it is sealed by both parties.














Party A: (seal)                                  Shandong Longkong Travel Development Co., Ltd (sealed) [company chop]


 


Legal Representative: (seal)          Zhang Shanjiu (sealed)







Party B: (seal)                                  Yishui Underground Fluorescent Lake Travel Development Co., Ltd (sealed) [company chop]







Legal Representative: (seal)          Li Hongwei (sealed)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75536-75537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-7849-6]


Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement; Sulphur 
Bank Mercury Mine Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement with NEC Acquisition Co. for recovery of past 
response costs concerning closure and abandonment of geothermal wells 
at the Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine Site in Lake County, California. The 
settlement requires the settling party to pay $1,700,000 to the EPA 
Hazardous Substance Superfund for past response costs incurred by EPA 
at the Site. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue the settling 
party pursuant to section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). For 
thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the 
Agency will receive written comments

[[Page 75537]]

relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments 
received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if 
comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that 
the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's 
response to any comments received will be available for public 
inspection at 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 18, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. A 
copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Larry Bradfish, 
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, ORC-3, San Francisco, CA 94105, 
telephone number (415) 972-3934. Comments should reference the Sulphur 
Bank Mercury Mine Superfund Site, Lake County, California and EPA 
Docket No. 2005-01 and should be addressed to Larry Bradfish at the 
address below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Bradfish, Assistant Regional 
Counsel (ORC-3), Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone: (415) 972-3934; fax: 
(415) 947-3570; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f3d2d3e3b39362c3771333e2d2d261f3a2f3e71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3b1a1b2b7b5baa0bbfdbfb2a1a1aa93b6a3b2fdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 8, 2004.
Elizabeth Adams,
Acting Director, Superfund Division, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 04-27668 Filed 12-16-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Iramick Blankenship, Appellant.

[832 NYS2d 847]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Shirley Troutman, J.), rendered January 3, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree (two counts) and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ.
### §3763. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3763 was editorially reclassified as section 10181 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 312.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
#### § 518.60 Purpose of termination and enforcement.

Sections 518.61 and 518.62 set forth uniform suspension, termination and enforcement procedures.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28101]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Economic Impact Policy

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application to finance the export of 
approximately $1.2 billion in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing 
equipment to dedicated foundries in China. The U.S. exports will enable 
the dedicated 200-mm and 300-mm foundries to produce approximately 
80,000 wafers per month (200-mm equivalent) of logic products. 
Available information indicates that some of this new production will 
be exported from China and consumed globally. Interested parties may 
submit comments on this transaction by e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5431373b3a3b393d377a3d392435372014312c3d397a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f0a0c00010002060c4106021f0e0c1b2f0a17060241080019">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Room 
1238, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

Helene S. Walsh,
Director, Policy Oversight and Review.
[FR Doc. 04-28101 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 712.205 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 712.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or an extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting of a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( c ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( d ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FILED HEREIN REFLECTS THE MERGER WITH M-R GROUP PLC
UNDER THE PURCHASE METHOD OF ACCOUNTING. THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FILED FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 WITH THE FORM 10-Q FILED ON AUGUST 16, 1999
REFLECTED SUCH MERGER UNDER THE POOLING OF INTERESTS METHOD OF ACCOUNTING.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,315
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,560
<PP&E>                                          71,430
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,765
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 431,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                     284,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   431,685
<SALES>                                        279,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               279,756
<CGS>                                          181,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,902
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,235
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.35


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.2


 


	
  Name of Company:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  SYSWIN INC.

  	
   

  	
  SYSWIN INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Number:

  	
   

  	
  Number

  	
  Ordinary Share(s):

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  - [no. of
  shares] -

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Ordinary Share(s):

  - [no. of
  shares] -

  	
   

  	
  

  Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands

   

  Share capital is US$50,000 divided into

  (i) 60,000,000,000 Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.0000008 each and

  (ii) 2,500,000,000 Preferred Shares of a par value of US$0.0000008 each

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Issued to:

  [name of shareholder]

  	
   

  	
  

  THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of
  shareholder] is the registered holder of [no. of
  shares] Ordinary Share(s) in the above-named Company subject to the
  Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dated

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  EXECUTED on behalf of the
  said Company on the
                   
  day of
                                 
  2010 by:

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Transferred from:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  DIRECTOR

  	
   

  	
   

  
					



 

















 


	
  TRANSFER

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  I

  	
  (the Transferor) for the
  value received

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  DO HEREBY transfer
  to

  	
  (the Transferee) the

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  shares standing in my name
  in the

  



 


undertaking called  SYSWIN INC.


 


To hold the same unto the Transferee


 


 


	
  Dated

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Signed by the Transferor

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  in the presence of:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Witness

  	
   

  	
  Transferor
§ 212.12 Mediation and dispute services. ( a ) The Office of Government Information Services of the National Archives and Records Administration (OGIS) is a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) resource for the public and the government. Congress has charged OGIS with reviewing FOIA policies, procedures and compliance of Federal agencies and to recommend changes to the FOIA. OGIS' mission also includes providing dispute resolution services between Federal agencies and requesters. OGIS works as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation.
( b ) When the component's FOIA office makes a determination on a request, the component's FOIA office shall offer the services of the FOIA Public Liaison, and will notify requesters of the mediation services provided by OGIS. Specifically, the component's FOIA office will include in the component's FOIA office's notification to the requester: ( 1 ) The right of the requester to seek assistance from the FOIA Public Liaison of the component's FOIA office, and in the case of an adverse determination;
( 2 ) The right of the requester to seek dispute resolution services from the FOIA Public Liaison of the component's FOIA office or the Office of Government Information Services.
#### James Bennerman, Appellant, v General Motors Corporation, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[832 NYS2d 811]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated May 5, 2006, which denied his motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 2004 to extend his time to move, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

As a result of a subsequent order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated July 11, 2006, which granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to restore the action to the trial calendar, the issue of whether the court properly denied the plaintiffs motion, inter alia, to extend his time to move, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404 has been rendered academic *(cf.*CPLR 3402 [a]; *Damas v Barboza,*206 AD2d 346, 346-347 [1994]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
#### Nicholas Turturro, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v Wayne Stevens, an Infant, et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 28, 1977, which granted plaintiffs’ application for a special preference. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and application for a special preference denied. The court abused its discretion in granting the special preference. A clear case of liability does not entitle a plaintiff to have his or her action preferred for trial over the other actions on the calendar. The remedy in such a situation is a motion for summary judgment (see *Binninger v Grillo,*28 AD2d 1100). A court cannot make a finding of bad faith under CPLR 3403 simply because it disagrees with the amount which the defendant has offered for settlement *(Oaklander v Sodikoff Contr. Co.,*35 AD2d 960). Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
3403.906 Remedies.       (a) The SPE is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 3.906.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3403.9—Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees
### §3797m. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797m was editorially reclassified as section 10564 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.