alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2691 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2691

   To amend the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002 to 
 require the President to submit to the Congress, within 90 days after 
  entering into a trade agreement, the implementing legislation, the 
 statement of administrative action, and supporting information, with 
                    respect to that trade agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2005

 Mr. Melancon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002 to 
 require the President to submit to the Congress, within 90 days after 
  entering into a trade agreement, the implementing legislation, the 
 statement of administrative action, and supporting information, with 
                    respect to that trade agreement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIME PERIOD FOR SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS OF INFORMATION ON 
              TRADE AGREEMENTS.

    Section 2105(a)(1)(C) of the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority 
Act of 2002 (19 U.S.C. 3805(a)(1)(C)) by striking ``(C) after'' and 
inserting ``(C) within 90 days after''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28042]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Request for Additional Information

    The Commission gives notice that it has requested that the parties 
to the below listed agreement provide additional information pursuant 
to section 6(d) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. 1705(d). 
The Commission has determined that further information is necessary to 
evaluate the proposed agreement modification. This action prevents the 
agreement modification from becoming effective as originally scheduled.
    Agreement No.: 011453-004.
    Title: Southern Africa/Oceania Agreement.
    Parties: Safmarine Container Lines N.V.; Mediterranean Shipping 
Co., S.A.; and A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: December 17, 2004.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-28042 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2531 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2531

 To amend titles 10 and 14, United States Code, to provide for the use 
          of gold in the metal content of the Medal of Honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

   Mr. Baca introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles 10 and 14, United States Code, to provide for the use 
          of gold in the metal content of the Medal of Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOLD CONTENT FOR MEDAL OF HONOR.

    (a) Requirement for Gold Content.--Sections 3741, 6241, and 8741 of 
title 10, United States Code, and section 491 of title 14, United 
States Code, are each amended by inserting ``the metal content of which 
is 90 percent gold and 10 percent alloy and'' after ``appropriate 
design,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any award of the Medal of Honor after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          27,656
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                39,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,824,794
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         261,836
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           258,816
<LOANS>                                        653,107
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,849,427
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,723,792
<SHORT-TERM>                                   445,139
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             65,823
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           436
<OTHER-SE>                                     614,237
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,849,427
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,741
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               35,391
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,918
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                50,050
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,415
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,635
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 349
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 24,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,995
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,464
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.23
<LOANS-NON>                                      8,001
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,789
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,320
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,445
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         23,445
        

</TABLE>
§ 96.44 Acting as primary provider. ( a ) When required by § 96.14(a), the agency or person acts as primary provider and adheres to the provisions in § 96.14(b) through (e). When acting as the primary provider, the agency or person develops and implements a service plan for providing all adoption services and provides all such services, either directly or through arrangements with supervised providers, exempted providers, public domestic authorities, competent authorities, Central Authorities, public foreign authorities, or, to the extent permitted by § 96.14(c), other foreign providers (agencies, persons, or other non-governmental entities).
( b ) The agency or person has an organizational structure, financial and personnel resources, and policies and procedures in place that demonstrate that the agency or person is capable of acting as a primary provider in any intercountry adoption case and, when acting as the primary provider, provides appropriate supervision to supervised providers and verifies the work of other foreign providers in accordance with §§ 96.45 and 96.46.
[71 FR 8131, Feb. 15, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 40635, July 14, 2014]
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Warren Richardson, Defendant. Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation, Appellant; District Attorney, Kings County, Respondent.

Appeal by the Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 2, 1977, which, *inter alia,*denied its motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon it at the instance of the respondent, the District Attorney of Kings County. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The District Attorney no longer seeks the information described in the subpoena duces tecum. Margett, J. P., Shapiro, Titone and Suozzi, JJ., concur.
2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 5-11-2005 

# U SA v . W ri ght P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 04-1174

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . W r i ght " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1215. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/1215- 1- NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 04- 1174 UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. L AR RY WRI GHT A ppel l ant

O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

fort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . N o. 03- cr - 00556) D istric t Ju d g e : H o n o ra b le J e ro m e B . S im a n d le

Subm i t t ed Pur s uantt o T hi r d C i r cui tL . A . R . 34. 1( a)

W ednes day , N ovember 3, 2004 B efore: A L ITO , B A R R Y , and F U E N T E S , C i rcui tJudg es.

( Fi l ed: M ay11, 2005)

OP I NI ONFU E N T E S, C i r cui tJ udge.

L arr yW r i ghtpl ed gui l t yt o a one c ounti nfor m at i on char gi ng hi m w i t h r obberyof a U n it ed S tat es P o st O ff

ice, i n v iolati o n o f 1 8 U . S . C . § § 2 1 1 4 (a) an d (2) . T h e D istri ct C o u rt sen tenc ed W ri g h t, p u rsua n t t o the U n it ed S tat es S en tenc ing G u idelines , to a 1 5 0 m o n th term of i m pr i s onm ent . W r i ghtr ece i ved a f our level enhanc ement for“otherw i s e us i ng” a d a n g e r o u s we a p o n wh i l e c o mm i t t i n g t h e o f f e n s e i n Co u n t On e o f

t h e i n f o r ma t i o n . On ap p ea l, h e c h all en g es h is sen tenc e u n d er U ni t ed Stat es v. B ooker , 543 U . S. __, 125 S. C t . 738 (2 0 0 5 ). H avi ng det er m i ned thatt he s ent enci ng i s s ues appel l ant r ai s es ar e bestdet er m i ned by t he Di s t r i c tCou r ti n t h e f i r s ti n s t a n c e , we wi l l v a c a t e t h e s e n t e n c e a n d r e ma n d f or r es ent enci ng i n acc or dance w i t h B ooker . W r i ghtr ai s es no chal l enge a s t o hi s convi ct i on and a c c o rd in g ly h a s w a iv e d a n ya rg u m e n t in th is re g a rd .
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2777 

To suspend temporarily the duty on oleoresin paprika. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on oleoresin paprika. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OLEORESIN PAPRIKA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 oleoresin paprika (CAS No. 

72968–48–0 & 8001–22–7) 

provided for in subheading 

3301–90–10) ........................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2777 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §§4552, 4553. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–24, §2(c)(1), Apr. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 182

Section 4552, Pub. L. 91–616, title I, §102, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1848; Pub. L. 93–282, title II, §203(b)(1), (2)(A), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 136; Pub. L. 96–180, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §966(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 595, required reports and recommendations by the Secretary to the Congress and to the President on programs of alcohol abuse and alcoholism. See section 290aa–4 of this title.

Section 4553, Pub. L. 91–616, title I, §103, as added Pub. L. 93–282, title I, §131, May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 133; amended Pub. L. 96–180, §5, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 97–35, title IX, §966(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 595, established the Interagency Committee on Federal Activities for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
§ 505.8 Agency review of requests for changes. ( a ) In reviewing a record in response to a request to amend or correct a file, we will incorporate the criteria of accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness of the record in the review.
( b ) If we agree with you to amend your records, we will: ( 1 ) Advise you in writing;
( 2 ) Correct the record accordingly;
( 3 ) And, to the extent that an accounting of disclosure was maintained, advise all previous recipients of the record of the corrections.
( c ) If we disagree with all or any portion of your request to amend a record, we will: ( 1 ) Advise you of the reasons for the determination; and
( 2 ) Inform you of your right to further review (see Sec. 505.9).
### §5776a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5776a was editorially reclassified as section 11296 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
Second Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.2

 SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT 

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT, dated November 4, 2010, is by and between CIRCOR, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), and Christopher R. Celtruda (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive entered into an executive change in control agreement made as of June 2006, as amended on December 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to increase the benefits to which the Executive may become entitled to upon a Change in Control (as defined in the Agreement). 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, do mutually covenant and agree as follows:

 1. Section 3(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “one (1) times” with the
following: 
 “two (2) times” 
 2. Section 3(a)(iv) of the Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase “one (1) year” with the following: 

“two (2) years” 
 3. The Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect as to all other provisions under said Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  


			
	CIRCOR, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ A. William Higgins

	Name:	 	A. William Higgins
	Title:	 	Chairman, President & CEO
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Christopher R. Celtruda

	Christopher R. Celtruda
#### James Morrow et al., Appellants, v John F. Barr et al., Respondents.

Appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of defendants, entered March 30, 1977 in Schenectady County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term and from an order of said court, entered April 15, 1977, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict as being against the weight of evidence. This action arose out of an automobile accident which occurred on Saturday, July 28, 1973 at about 12:00 o’clock noon. Plaintiff Marcia Morrow, the operator of one of the vehicles, commenced an action for personal injuries and her husband, James Morrow, commenced a derivative action. At the conclusion of the proof the court ordered directed verdicts in favor of plaintiff driver on both the issue of negligence and the issue of contributory negligence. The case was thus submitted to the jury solely on the issue of damages. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action in favor of defendants. This appeal ensued. Plaintiff driver testified that within an hour after the accident she started to experience pain in her left shoulder. She also testified to her subsequent medical treatment and continuing pain. Her husband supported much of her testimony. Her doctor testified that he found muscle spasm and diagnosed a "strain, severe bi-lateral cervical trapezius muscles” with a 15% permanent limitation of motion. Defendants’ doctor found no permanency. He testified that X rays revealed a calcific deposit in plaintiff’s left shoulder which pointed to an old injury and that all function appeared normal. The defendant driver testified that at no time did plaintiff complain of any injury and, in fact, replied in the negative when asked if she were hurt. The record also reveals that she did not go to a doctor until the Monday following the accident; that she resumed her work as a bus driver in the fall of 1973; and that she did not visit a doctor from October, 1973 to October, 1974. On the issue of damages the record presents questions of credibility which were solely for the jury and it implicitly resolved such questions in favor of defendants. Considering the record in its entirety, we are of the view that the jury could properly conclude that plaintiff sustained no injury as a result of this accident. We note that no claim was made for an aggravation of a pre-existing condition. Furthermore, we should not disturb the trial court’s denial of the motion to set the verdict aside *(Micallef v Miehle Co., Div. of Miehle-Goss Dexter,*39 NY2d 376, 381; *Zera v City of New York,*35 AD2d 519). The judgment and order should be affirmed *(Ellis v Hoelzel,*57 AD2d 968; *Hegyi v Jones, 40*AD2d 1053). *Judgment*and order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
(April 18, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Virginia Scott, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on October 7, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833). No opinion. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Evans and Markewich, JJ.
#### ASMUSSEN, Respondent, v. METROPOLITAN ST. RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 24, 1905.)

Action by John T. Asmussen against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company. O. F. Brown, for appellant. - F. E. Blackwell, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce judgment as entered, including costs and allowance, to the sum of $3,331.45, in which event, judgment (as so modified) and order affirmed, without costs.
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Barrett against Stephen P. Kennedy, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person from the order dismissing him as a member of the Police Department, denied, with leave, however, to renew the motion upon a proper affidavit of merits. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente and Bergan, JJ.
### §3796dd–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796dd–1 was editorially reclassified as section 10382 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
### §3505b. Functions and duties of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs

The Secretary shall utilize the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs—

(1) to administer all Federal laws for which the Secretary has administrative responsibility and which provide for or authorize the making of grants or contracts related to population research and family planning programs;

(2) to administer and be responsible for all population and family planning research carried on directly by the Department of Health and Human Services or supported by the Department through grants to, or contracts with, entities and individuals;

(3) to act as a clearinghouse for information pertaining to domestic and international population research and family planning programs for use by all interested persons and public and private entities;

(4) to provide a liaison with the activities carried on by other agencies and instrumentalities of the Federal Government relating to population research and family planning;

(5) to provide or support training for necessary manpower for domestic programs of population research and family planning programs of service and research; and

(6) to coordinate and be responsible for the evaluation of the other Department of Health and Human Services programs related to population research and family planning and to make periodic recommendations to the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 91–572, §4, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1505; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" in pars. (2) and (6) pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.