alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4414 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain dyed polyacrylonitrile 

staple. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2012 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the reduction of duty on certain dyed 

polyacrylonitrile staple. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DYED POLYACRYLONITRILE STAPLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.40.30 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain dyed polyacrylonitrile staple) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘12/31/2012’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2015’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4414 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ben Berkowitz, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on November 19, 1976, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman and Capozzoli, JJ.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2505

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzoic acid, o- and ((3-(4,6-dimethyl2-pyrimidinyl)-ureido)sulfonyl)-, methylester (Sulfometuron methyl). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005

Mr. MCCRERY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Benzoic acid, o- and 

((3-(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)-ureido)sulfonyl)-, 

methylester (Sulfometuron methyl).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BENZOIC ACID, O- AND ((3-(4,6-DIMETHYL-2-

4 PYRIMIDINYL)-UREIDO)SULFONYL)-, 

5 METHYLESTER (SULFOMETURON METHYL). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading:
2

•HR 2505 IH 

‘‘ 9902.08.15 Benzoic acid, o- and ((3-

(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)-

ureido)sulfonyl)-, 

methylester (Sulfometuron 

methyl) (CAS No. 74222–

97–2) (provided in subheading 3808.30.50) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)),  and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/Mac McConnell


Mac McConnell


Chief Financial Officer





February 2, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 92.87 Consular responsibility for serving orders to show cause.

Officers of the Foreign Service are required to serve orders to show cause issued in contempt proceedings on a person who has failed or neglected to appear in answer to a subpoena served in accordance with the provisions of § 92.86. (Section 1, 62 Stat. 949; 28 U.S.C. 1784.)
1:45 PM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

Judge Thelton E. Henderson

06/10/10

Case 3:08-cv-04914-TEH Document 55 Filed 06/10/10 Page 1 of 1
§ 9.6 Derivative classification. ( a ) *Definition.* Derivative classification is: the incorporating, paraphrasing, restating, or generating in new form information that is already classified and the marking of the new material consistent with the classification of the source material, or the marking of the information in accordance with an authorized classification guide. Duplication or reproduction of existing classified information is not derivative classification. Persons who apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide need not possess original classification authority.
( b ) *Responsibility.* Information classified derivatively from other classified information shall be classified and marked in accordance with instructions from an authorized classifier or in accordance with an authorized classification guide and shall comply with the standards set forth in sections 2.1-2.2 of the Executive Order and 32 CFR 2001.22. The duration of classification of a document classified by a derivative classifier using a classification guide shall not exceed 25 years except for: ( 1 ) Information that would reveal the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source (50X1-HUM) or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction (50X2-WMD), and
( 2 ) Specific information incorporated into the classification guide under section 2.2(e) of the Executive Order relating to exemptions from automatic declassification.
( c ) *Department of State Classification Guide.* The Department of State Classification Guide (DSCG) is the primary authority for the classification of information in documents created by Department of State personnel. The Guide is classified “Confidential” and is found on the Department of State's classified Web site.
### §3797l. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3797l was editorially reclassified as section 10563 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2697 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(2-), [2,4-dihydro-4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)–4-nitrophenyl]azo-kN1]-5-met hyl-3H-pyrazol-3-onato(2-)- 

kO3][3-[[4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1-( 4-methylphenyl)–5-(oxo-kO)–1Hpyrazol-4-yl]azo-kN1]-4-(hydro xy-kO)–5-nitrobenzenesulfonato(3-)]-, disodium. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Chromate(2-), [2,4- 

dihydro-4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)–4-nitrophenyl]azo-kN1]-5- 

met hyl-3H-pyrazol-3-onato(2-)-kO3][3-[[4,5-dihydro-3- 

methyl-1-( 4-methylphenyl)–5-(oxo-kO)–1H-pyrazol-4- 

yl]azo-kN1]-4-(hydro xy-kO)–5-nitrobenzenesulfonato(3- 

)]-, disodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2697 IH 

1 SECTION 1. CHROMATE(2-), [2,4-DIHYDRO-4-[[2-(HYDROXY2 KO)–4-NITROPHENYL]AZO-KN1]-5-METHYL-3H3 PYRAZOL-3-ONATO(2-)-KO3][3-[[4,5-DIHYDRO-3- 

4 METHYL-1-(4-METHYLPHENYL)–5-(OXO-KO)–1H5 PYRAZOL-4-YL]AZO-KN1]-4-(HYDROXY-KO)–5- 

6 NITROBENZENESULFONATO(3-)]-, DISODIUM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.02 Chromate(2-), [2,4-dihydro4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)–4- 

nitrophenyl]azo-kN1]-5- 

methyl-3H-pyrazol-3- 

onato(2-)-kO3][3-[[4,5- 

dihydro-3-methyl-1-(4- 

methylphenyl)–5-(oxo-kO)– 

1H-pyrazol-4-yl]azo-kN1]-4- 

(hydroxy-kO)–5- 

nitrobenzenesulfonato(3-)]-, 

disodium. (CAS No. 75199– 

08–5) (provided for in subheading 3204.12.45) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

13 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

14 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                         739,757                 273,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,438,429               1,704,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (108,337)                (65,198)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,935,067               6,725,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,430,448              12,288,463
<PP&E>                                       9,432,878               7,906,111
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,895,260)             (3,688,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,574,952              25,548,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,108,376              14,147,200
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        52,397                  52,397
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,354,449               8,298,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,574,952              25,548,169
<SALES>                                     46,207,632              40,859,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,207,632              40,859,413
<CGS>                                       17,317,930              15,196,736
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,317,930              15,196,736
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            26,820,128              22,934,956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             707,309                 553,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,362,265               2,174,275
<INCOME-TAX>                                   558,507                 887,234
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            803,758               1,287,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   803,758               1,287,041
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19                    0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17                    0.27


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 O RD ER PU RSU AN T TO STIPU LA TIO N

 AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIQAL

 No. CV-08-2754 EM C -1-

GEOFFREY ROTWEIN (CA SBN 58176)

LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY ROTWEIN

400 Montgomery Street, Second Floor

San Francisco, California 94104

Telefacsimile: (415) 397-0862

Telephone: (415) 397-0860

Attorney for Plaintiff

LEGAL ADDITIONS LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEGAL ADDITIONS LLC, a California

Limited Liability Corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JEROME KOWALSKI, et al,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-08-2754 EMC

ORDER PURSUANT TO

STIPULATION TO WAIVE

JURY TRIAL

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation between the parties as set

forth below, in light of the Court’s March 19, 2010, Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to

Dismiss (Docket No. 115), the trial of those causes of action still remaining, from the Third

Amended Complaint, among those parties still remaining in the action, shall be a bench trial

instead of a jury trial.

DATED: March , 2010 

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN

MAGISTRATE/JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 3:08-cv-02754-EMC Document 117 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 O RD ER PU RSU AN T TO STIPU LA TIO N

 AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIQAL

 No. CV-08-2754 EM C -2-

STIPULATION

It is hereby stipulated that, in light of the Court’s March 19, 2010, Order Granting

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 115), the trial of those causes of action still

remaining, from the Third Amended Complaint, among those parties still remaining in the

action, shall be a bench trial instead of a jury trial. The parties further revise their estimate

of the length of the trial, in light of said Order, to no more than two full days.

DATED: March 20, 2010 /s/ Geoffrey Rotwein 

GEOFFREY ROTWEIN

Attorney for Plaintiff

LEGAL ADDITIONS LLC

 /s/ Alan G. Dowling

ALAN G. DOWLING

Attorney for Defendants

JEROME KOWALSKI & CO., INC.

Case 3:08-cv-02754-EMC Document 117 Filed 03/22/10 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Research Program Projects (PO1).                    

*Date:*                         January 5, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Guo HE Zhang, PhD, MD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-451-6524,                         *zhanggu@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 15, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-27961 Filed 12-21-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Keith D. WILSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Don WOOD, Superintendent; Theodis Beck, Secretary of Corrections, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 06-7970.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2007.

Decided: May 2, 2007.

Keith D. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely* and the court’s order denying Wilson’s motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 The district court also found Wilson failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
### §4971 to 4973. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–13, title II, §2121, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1584

Section 4971, Pub. L. 93–113, title I, §111, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 399; Pub. L. 98–288, §9, May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 191; Pub. L. 99–551, §5, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3073; Pub. L. 101–204, title II, §201(2), Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1813; Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §330(a)(2), (3), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 902, set forth the congressional statement of purpose for the University Year for VISTA program of full-time volunteer service by students enrolled in institutions of higher education.

Section 4972, Pub. L. 93–113, title I, §112, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 399; Pub. L. 98–288, §30(b)(1), May 21, 1984, 98 Stat. 197; Pub. L. 99–551, §10(i)(2), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3078; Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §330(a)(4), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 902, provided the Director with authority to operate University Year for VISTA program.

Section 4973, Pub. L. 93–113, title I, §113, Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 399; Pub. L. 96–143, §5, Dec. 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 1075; Pub. L. 97–35, title VI, §608(f)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §330(a)(2), (3), (b), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 902, set out special conditions related to the University Year for VISTA program.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
### §5106b. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–235, title I, §108, Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3078

Section, Pub. L. 93–247, title I, §108, formerly §9, as added Pub. L. 100–294, title I, §101, Apr. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 113; renumbered title I, §108, and amended Pub. L. 101–126, §3(a)(1), (2), (b)(4), Oct. 25, 1989, 103 Stat. 764, 765, related to technical assistance to States for child abuse prevention and treatment programs.
### §5106f–1. Report concerning voluntary reporting system

Not later than April 30, 1993, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, shall prepare and submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report concerning the measures being taken to assist States in implementing a voluntary reporting system for child abuse and neglect. Such reports shall contain information concerning the extent to which the child abuse and neglect reporting systems developed by the States are coordinated with the automated foster care and adoption reporting system required under section 679 of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–295, title I, §142, May 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, Adoption and Family Services Act of 1992, and not as part of title I of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act which comprises this subchapter.
#### § 513.310 Procedures.

Broadcasting Board of Governors shall process debarment actions as informally as practicable, consistent with the principles of fundamental fairness, using the procedures in §§ 513.311 through 513.314.
#### George *et al. v.*Howard Piano Company.

April 12, 1912.

Attachment. Before Judge J. B. Park. Morgan superior court. June 17, 1911.

*M. C. Few*and *Percy Middlebroolcs,*for plaintiffs in error.

*C. B. Rosser Jr.*and *Williford & Lambert,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

The court did not err in failing to instruct the jury in the respect indicated in the motion for a new trial; the assignments of error upon the instructions given were not meritorious; there was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2532 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2532

  To suspend temporarily the duty on urea, polymer with formaldehyde 
                              (Pergopak).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2005

  Mr. Cantor introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on urea, polymer with formaldehyde 
                              (Pergopak).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UREA, POLYMER WITH FORMALDEHYDE (PERGOPAK).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.10.01      Urea, polymer with  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         formaldehyde                                                       31/2008
                         (Pergopak) (CAS
                         No. 9011-05-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3909.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```