Stipulation and Order re: Extend Briefing Deadlines 

Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. 

(Case No. 08-04196 BZ

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB#159747 

DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB#236458 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL

925 West Hedding Street 

San José, California 95126 

T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

DANIELLE POLLAR, SHALAWN POLLAR 

as Guardian Ad Litem for J.A., a minor 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANIELLE POLLAR, et al., ) Case No. 08-04196 BZ 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) STIPULATION FOR AN 

vs. ) ORDER TO EXTEND 

 ) BRIEFING DEADLINES 

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

_____ ) 

The parties hereto, by and through their respective counsel, in consideration of the 

setting of a Settlement Conference on March 2nd, 2009, and this court’s Scheduling Order 

issued February 5th, 2009, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows; 

1. The current deadline for Plaintiffs’ Oppositions to the Amended Motions for 

Summary Judgment filed by the City Defendants (Docket #62) and County 

Defendants (Docket #66) is Friday, February 5, 2010, as to the City Defendants, and 

February 8th, 2010, as to the County Defendants, per the Stipulation for same, and 

Order filed February 3, 2010 (Docket #75). 

Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 81 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 3
Stipulation and Order re: Extend Briefing Deadlines 

Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. 

(Case No. 08-04196 BZ

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

2. In consideration of the recited facts pertaining to the recently calendared Settlement 

Conference for March 2nd, 2010, and the courts’ Scheduling Order of February 5th, 

2010, the parties agree as follows; 

1. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the City Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment shall be filed by February 8th, 2010. 

2. City Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition, if any, shall be filed by 

February 26th, 2010. 

3. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the County Defendants Motion for Summary 

Judgment shall be filed by February 22nd, 2010.

4. County Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition, if any, shall be filed by 

March 8th, 2010. 

 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: 2/5/10 ___/S/ Robert R. Powell_______ 

 ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Dated: 2/5/10 __ /S/ Rebecca Widen_________ 

 REBECCA WIDEN, ESQ. 

 Attorney for County of Alameda, and 

 Individually Named Defendant 

 Employees of the County of Alameda 

Dated: 2/5/10 ___/S/ Patrick R. Co __________ 

 PATRICK R. CO, ESQ. 

 Attorney for City of Hayward, and 

Individually Named Defendant 

 Employees of the City of Hayward 

Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 81 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 3
Stipulation and Order re: Extend Briefing Deadlines 

Pollar v. County of Alameda, et al. 

(Case No. 08-04196 BZ

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based on the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the 

court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties and orders as follows: 

1. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the City Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment shall be filed by February 8th, 2010, 

2. City Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition, if any, shall be filed by 

February 26th, 2010. 

3. Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the County Defendants Motion for Summary 

Judgment shall be filed by February 22nd, 2010, 

4. County Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ Opposition, if any, shall be filed by 

March 8th, 2010 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ____/____/10 ____________________________ 

 JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT 

 COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

 DISTRICT- SAN FRANCISCO 

2 8

Bernard Zimmerman

Case 3:08-cv-04196-BZ Document 81 Filed 02/09/10 Page 3 of 3