alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2445 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on PHBA. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on PHBA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHBA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 PHBA) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Ella M. Polzin et al., Respondents, v. George P. Savage, as Executor of Mabelle A. Shuert, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term denying motions by defendant Savage and by defendants Bartlett and Gifford for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
### §4374. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated for the operations of the Office of Environmental Quality and the Council on Environmental Quality not to exceed the following sums for the following fiscal years which sums are in addition to those contained in Public Law 91–190:

(a) $2,126,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1979.

(b) $3,000,000 for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1980, and September 30, 1981.

(c) $44,000 for the fiscal years ending September 30, 1982, 1983, and 1984.

(d) $480,000 for each of the fiscal years ending September 30, 1985 and September 30, 1986.

(Pub. L. 91–224, title II, §205, Apr. 3, 1970, 84 Stat. 115; Pub. L. 93–36, May 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 72; Pub. L. 94–52, §1, July 3, 1975, 89 Stat. 258; Pub. L. 94–298, May 29, 1976, 90 Stat. 587; Pub. L. 95–300, June 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 342; Pub. L. 97–350, §1, Oct. 18, 1982, 96 Stat. 1661; Pub. L. 98–581, §1, Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3093.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 91–190, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, known as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1984—Cl. (d). Pub. L. 98–581 added cl. (d).

1982—Cl. (c). Pub. L. 97–350 added cl. (c).

1978—Pub. L. 95–300 added cls. (a) and (b). Former cls. (a) to (d), which authorized appropriations of $2,000,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, $500,000 for transition period of July 1, 1976 to Sept. 30, 1976, $3,000,000 for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1977, and $3,000,000 for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1978, respectively, were struck out.

1976—Pub. L. 94–298 made changes in structure by designating existing provisions as cls. (a) and (b) and adding cls. (c) and (d).

1975—Pub. L. 94–52 substituted "$2,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and not to exceed $500,000 for the transition period (July 1, 1976 to September 30, 1976)" for "$1,500,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, and $2,000,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1975".

1973—Pub. L. 93–36 substituted provisions authorizing to be appropriated for operations of the Office of Environmental Quality and the Council on Environmental Quality $1,500,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1974, and $2,000,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1975, for provisions authorizing to be appropriated not to exceed $500,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1970, not to exceed $750,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1971, not to exceed $1,250,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1972, and not to exceed $1,500,000 for fiscal year ending June 30, 1973.
### §295m. Prohibition against discrimination on basis of sex

The Secretary may not make a grant, loan guarantee, or interest subsidy payment under this subchapter to, or for the benefit of, any school of medicine, osteopathic medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, optometry, pharmacy, podiatric medicine, or public health or any training center for allied health personnel, or graduate program in clinical psychology, unless the application for the grant, loan guarantee, or interest subsidy payment contains assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that the school or training center will not discriminate on the basis of sex in the admission of individuals to its training programs. The Secretary may not enter into a contract under this subchapter with any such school or training center unless the school, training center, or graduate program furnishes assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that it will not discriminate on the basis of sex in the admission of individuals to its training programs. In the case of a school of medicine which—

(1) on October 13, 1992, is in the process of changing its status as an institution which admits only female students to that of an institution which admits students without regard to their sex, and

(2) is carrying out such change in accordance with a plan approved by the Secretary,

the provisions of the preceding sentences of this section shall apply only with respect to a grant, contract, loan guarantee, or interest subsidy to, or for the benefit of such a school for a fiscal year beginning after June 30, 1979.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §794, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title I, §102, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2063.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 794 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 295h–2 of this title prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–408.

Another prior section 794 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 294h–3 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 91–519.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 71 FR 34520 and 34521, June 15, 2006.

#### §§ 40.207-40.210 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 149 (Friday, August 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 46940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18697]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9010-4]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements

Filed 07/22/2013 Through 07/26/2013
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20130226, Final EIS, USN, FL, Naval Air Station Key West 
Airfield Operations Review Period Ends: 09/03/2013, Contact: Greg 
Timoney 904-542-6866.
EIS No. 20130227, Draft EIS, NASA, CA, Proposed Demolition and 
Environmental Cleanup Activities at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, 
Comment Period Ends: 09/16/2013, Contact: Allen Elliott 256-544-0662.
EIS No. 20130228, Final EIS, USACE, CO, Chatfield Reservoir Storage 
Reallocation, Review Period Ends: 09/03/2013, Contact: Gwyn M. Jarrett 
402-995-2717.
EIS No. 20130229, Final EIS, FAA, AK, Runway Safety Area Improvements 
Kodiak Airport, Review Period Ends: 09/03/2013, Contact: Leslie Grey 
907-271-5453.
EIS No. 20130230, Draft EIS, NPS, NJ, Gateway National Recreation Area 
General Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 10/02/2013 Contact: 
Suzanne McCarthy 718-354-4663.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20130134, Draft EIS, FERC, CA, Drum-Spaulding Hydroelectric 
Project and Yuba-Bear Hydroelectric Project for Hydropower License, 
Comment Period Ends: 08/22/2013, Contact: Alan Mitchnick 202-502-6074. 
Revision to FR Notice Published 05/24/2013; Extending Comment Period 
from 07/23/2013 to 08/22/2013.

    Dated: July 30, 2013.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-18697 Filed 8-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
### §300gg–138. Continuity of care

A health care provider or health care facility shall, in the case of an individual furnished items and services by such provider or facility for which coverage is provided under a group health plan or group or individual health insurance coverage pursuant to section 300gg–113 of this title, section 9818 of title 26, or section 1185g of title 29—

(1) accept payment from such plan or such issuer (as applicable) (and cost-sharing from such individual, if applicable, in accordance with subsection (a)(2)(C) of such section 300gg–113 of this title, 9818 of title 26, or 1185g of title 29) for such items and services as payment in full for such items and services; and

(2) continue to adhere to all policies, procedures, and quality standards imposed by such plan or issuer with respect to such individual and such items and services in the same manner as if such termination had not occurred.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title XXVII, §2799B–8, as added Pub. L. 116–260, div. BB, title I, §113(d), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2873.)
§ 140.7 Multilateral institutions and international organizations. Assistance provided to or through multilateral institutions or international organizations is subject to this part as follows: ( a ) Where the government agency providing assistance has reasonable grounds to suspect that a recipient multilateral institution or international organization may be or may have been involved in drug trafficking, the provisions of § 140.6 shall apply.
( b ) Where the government agency providing assistance designates the recipient of assistance from the multilateral institution or international organization and the designated recipient is a covered individual or entity, the provisions of this part shall apply as if the assistance were provided directly to the designated recipient.
( c ) Where the government agency providing assistance does not designate the recipient of assistance from the multilateral institution or international organization, this part do not apply, other than as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, except that the agency's agreement with the multilateral institution or international organization shall stipulate that such entity is to make reasonable efforts, as necessary, to ensure that the assistance is not diverted in support of drug trafficking.
Example: The State Department provides $600,000 to the United Nations for the United Nations Drug Control Program, specifically designating that Government D of a covered country receive $150,000 and Corporation E receive $60,000 for training programs in a covered country. Individuals who will receive training are not specifically designated by the State Department. The United Nations is a covered entity based on § 140.4(a)(1); Government D is a covered entity based on §§ 140.4(b) and 140.7(b); Corporation E is not a covered entity under §§ 140.4(b) and 140.7(b) because it has been designated to receive less than $100,000 in assistance (§ 140.3(c)(2)). Participant trainees are not covered individuals because they fall under the exception contained in § 140.7(c) (see also § 140.4(a)(2)).
#### § 530.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 530.150, no qualified handicapped person shall, because the Board's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Board.
Editorial Note on Part 64
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 64 appear at 64 FR 54540, Oct. 7, 1999.

§ 64.4 Contents of application. The foreign government shall provide information in the application showing that its program meets the criteria set forth in § 516.5, and shall include in such application the following: ( a ) Name and description of the program and the provisions of legislation or regulation authorizing the program;
( b ) Number of annual U.S. citizen participants expected, including the number of U.S. Federal employees;
( c ) Average duration of stay abroad;
( d ) Department of State of the foreign government responsible for the program;
( e ) Name and address of contact in the United States with whom communication may be made with respect to the program; in the absence of such a contact in the United States, the name and address of a contact in the home office or headquarters of the foreign government.
#### § 146.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 22 CFR part 141.

[65 FR 52879, Aug. 30, 2000]
Case 3:08-cv-04850-VRW Document 45 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 2
August 13, 2010 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:08-cv-04850-VRW Document 45 Filed 08/13/10 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walker Stigler, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Kings County, rendered April. 29, 1959, convicting and sentencing him for the crime of murder in the first degree. Judgment affirmed. (Code Grim. Pro., § 542.) Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel A. Coccoluto, ActingChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tomy knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Daniel A. Coccoluto |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Daniel A. Coccoluto     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 14, 2005  |

 

1

----
#### Hadaway *v.*Culpepper, administrator.

April 12, 1912.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Freeman. Meriwether superior court. August 12, 1911.

*N. F. Culpepper,*for plaintiff in error.

*McLaughlin, Jones & Jones,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

The court did not err in . giving the instructions to which exceptions were taken; nor in the admission of evidence; nor in failing to instruct the jury in certain respects of which complaint was made. The evidence authorized the verdict, and it was not error to refuse a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
!’ 

. . . . 

.I’ . 

l 

I . ë, 

OFFICE OF THE ATORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN :. 

‘. 
g~tztorablo F. L. Wilson, Pago 2 

In your fn~ulr~ you odvieo that the p&on in gusa$ion 

$0 opc+ratltlg a motor vehicle upon the hzL$ha!ya of this State end 

1s haul3ns (jravol therein. !Chwo can be no doubt but $hat this 

poraon.ocmez within'tho doflnltion of the term "oommer&l oper&or" 

@oos ho is oxmpt from procurln, * a license undor th* terns- of 

goation 3, hrtblo 6537b, Vernonla Annotcrtod civil Ststutes;i,An 

oxaminstion of 6aid SeCtiOn 3, 8uqvaj does not rovoal that tho 

J,&SlAtUPO mode.provieio~ for .tho exemption of ~.nployeea of the 

gtato cf Toxae , ;- 

ve are 

9kustinp: t&t tha f.or~soinC fully’an~wers your inquiry, 

. .I 

. 

. 

J?XiST ASSISTANT 

ATTOFUSF?L GXNERAL 

: 

. . 

Asslit&&.
§ 72.16 Procedure for inventorying and appraising effects. ( a ) After taking physical possession of the personal estate of a deceased United States citizen or non-citizen national, the consular officer should promptly inventory the personal effects.
( b ) If the personal estate taken into physical possession includes apparently valuable items, the consular officer may, in his or her discretion, seek a professional appraisal for such items, but only to the extent that there are funds available in the estate or from other sources (such as the next of kin) to cover the cost of appraisal.
( c ) The consular officer must also prepare a list of articles not taken into physical possession, with an indication of any measures taken by the consular office to safeguard such items for submission with the inventory of effects.
#### In the Matter of John A. Shaw, Petitioner, v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondent.

Motion for a stay granted, without costs, upon condition that the petitioner perfect his appeal, file note of issue and file and serve his record and brief on or before December 20, 1960 and be ready for argument at the January 1961 Term of this court.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-11197

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROMAR BERNARD,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-28-1

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Romar Bernard has moved for leave 

to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Bernard has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 22, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-11197 Document: 00514247322 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2017
No. 16-11197

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-11197 Document: 00514247322 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2017
### §§5145, 5146. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §105(d), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4691

Section 5145, Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §305, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 148, related to authority of President to provide assistance in an emergency.

Section 5146, Pub. L. 93–288, title III, §306, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 148, related to cooperation of Federal agencies in rendering disaster assistance.
§ 521.7 Complaint. ( a ) On or after the date the Department of Justice approves the issuance of a complaint in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3803(b)(1), the reviewing official may serve a complaint on the defendant, as provided in § 521.8.
( b ) The complaint shall state: ( 1 ) Allegations of liability against the defendant including the statutory basis for liability, an identification of the claims or statements that are the basis for the alleged liability, and the reasons why liability allegedly arises from such claims or statements;
( 2 ) The maximum amount of penalties and assessments for which the defendant may be held liable;
( 3 ) Instructions for filing an answer to request a hearing, including a specific statement of the defendant's right to request a hearing by filing an answer and to be represented by a representative; and
( 4 ) That failure to file an answer within 30 days of service of the complaint will result in the imposition of the maximum amount of penalties and assessment without right to appeal, as provided in § 521.10.
( c ) At the same time the reviewing official serves the complaint, he or she shall serve the defendant with a copy of these regulations.
#### Hyman Feinberg, and Louis C. Robinson, trading as Chicago Smelting & Refining Company, appellants, v. Hyman Rose, appellee.

Gen. No. 27,761.

Claim for $125.00 paid for prompt delivery of metals purchased. Claim for set-off. Judgment for defendant. Damages fixed at $195.00. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1922.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 20, 1923.

Louis S. Gibson, for appellants. Epstein & FeiweR, for appeEee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Thomson

delivered the opinion of the court.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-28039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Office of Research and Development; Government Owned Invention 
Available for Licensing

AGENCY: Office of Research and Development, VA.

ACTION: Notice of government owned invention available for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is owned by the U.S. Government as 
represented by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and is available for 
licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 207 and 37 CFR part 404 and/or 
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) Collaboration 
under 15 U.S.C. 3710a to achieve expeditious commercialization of 
results of federally funded research and development. Foreign patents 
are filed on selected inventions to extend market coverage for U.S. 
companies and may also be available for licensing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical and licensing information on 
the invention may be obtained by writing to: Mindy L. Aisen, M.D., 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Acting Director Technology Transfer 
Program, Office of Research and Development, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420; fax: (202) 254-0473; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#761b1f18120f58171f051318361b171f1a58001758111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="167b7f78726f38777f657378567b777f7a38607738717960">[email protected]</span></a>. Any request for information should include the 
number and title for the relevant invention as indicated below. Issued 
patents may be obtained from the Commissioner of Patents, U.S. Patent 
and Trademark Office, Washington, DC 20231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention available for licensing is: 
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/580,382 ``Computer Program 
to Quantify Pharyngeal Residue and Swallowing''.

    Dated: December 13, 2004.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 04-28039 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>