alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5181. Relocation assistance

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person otherwise eligible for any kind of replacement housing payment under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91–646) [42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.] shall be denied such eligibility as a result of his being unable, because of a major disaster as determined by the President, to meet the occupancy requirements set by such Act.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title IV, §414, formerly §411, May 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 157; renumbered §414, Pub. L. 100–707, title I, §106(h), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4705.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 91–646, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1894, which is classified principally to chapter 61 (§4601 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4601 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 414(a), (b) of Pub. L. 93–288 was renumbered section 417(a), (b) by Pub. L. 100–707 and is classified to section 5184 of this title.
§ 46.2 Authority of departure-control officer to prevent alien's departure from the United States. ( a ) No alien shall depart, or attempt to depart, from the United States if his departure would be prejudicial to the interests of the United States under the provisions of § 46.3. Any departure-control officer who knows or has reason to believe that the case of an alien in the United States comes within the provisions of § 46.3 shall temporarily prevent the departure of such alien from the United States and shall serve him with a written temporary order directing him not to depart, or attempt to depart, from the United States until notified of the revocation of the order.
( b ) The written order temporarily preventing an alien, other than an enemy alien, from departing from the United States shall become final 15 days after the date of service thereof upon the alien, unless prior thereto the alien requests a hearing as hereinafter provided. At such time as the alien is served with an order temporarily preventing his departure from the United States, he shall be notified in writing concerning the provisions of this paragraph, and shall be advised of his right to request a hearing if entitled thereto under § 46.4. In the case of an enemy alien, the written order preventing departure shall become final on the date of its service upon the alien.
( c ) Any alien who seeks to depart from the United States may be required, in the discretion of the departure-control officer, to be examined under oath and to submit for official inspection all documents, articles, and other property in his possession which are being removed from the United States upon, or in connection with, the alien's departure. The departure-control officer may permit such other persons, including officials of the Department of State and interpreters, to participate in such examination or inspection and may exclude from presence at such examination or inspection any person whose presence would not further the objectives of such examination or inspection. The departure-control officer shall temporarily prevent the departure of any alien who refuses to submit to such examination or inspection, and may, if necessary to cause the alien to submit to such examination or inspection, take possession of the alien's passport or other travel document or issue a subpoena requiring the alien to submit to such examination or inspection.
[22 FR 10827, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 45 FR 64174, Sept. 29, 1980]
Case 3:08-cv-04232-JL Document 67 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04232-JL Document60 Filed03/09/10 Page1 of 2
Case 3:08-cv-04232-JL Document 67 Filed 03/11/10 Page 2 of 2 Case3:08-cv-04232-JL Document60 Filed03/09/10 Page2 of 2
#### § 518.37 Property trust relationship.

Real property, equipment, intangible property and debt instruments that are acquired or improved with Federal funds shall be held in trust by the recipient as trustee for the beneficiaries of the project or program under which the property was acquired or improved. Agencies may require recipients to record liens or other appropriate notices of record to indicate that personal or real property has been acquired or improved with Federal funds and that use and disposition conditions apply to the property.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARTIN HERRERA

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00043

- CR

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D05440 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s third request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until August 30, 2017

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Leticia Perez , Court Reporter for the 41 st District Court

,

for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and numbered

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before August 30, 2017

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of July , 201 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox

, JJ.
### §§5634 to 5639. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, §7263(a)(1)(B), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4443

Section 5634, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §224, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1122; Pub. L. 95–115, §4(d), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1054; Pub. L. 96–509, §§12, 19(h), Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2759, 2765; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §627, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2114, related to funding of special emphasis prevention and treatment programs through grants and contracts.

Section 5635, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §225, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1123; Pub. L. 94–503, title I, §130(c), Oct. 15, 1976, 90 Stat. 2425; Pub. L. 95–115, §4(e), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1055; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §628, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2116, related to applications for grants and contracts under section 5634 of this title.

Section 5636, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §226, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1124, provided for proceedings by Administrator in the case of noncompliance of program or activity with this subchapter.

Section 5637, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §227, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1124; Pub. L. 95–115, §4(f), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1055; Pub. L. 96–509, §13(a), Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2759; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §629, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2117, related to use of funds paid pursuant to this subchapter.

Section 5638, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §228, Sept. 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 1124; Pub. L. 95–115, §4(g)(1), (2), (3)(A), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1055, 1056; Pub. L. 96–509, §§14, 19(i), Dec. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 2760, 2765; Pub. L. 98–473, title II, §630, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2117, related to continuing financial assistance for programs.

Section 5639, Pub. L. 93–415, title II, §229, as added Pub. L. 95–115, §4(h), Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1056, provided for confidentiality of program records.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1988, see section 7296(a) of Pub. L. 100–690, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 11101 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony P., Appellant.

[715 NYS2d 347]

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court (Affronti, J.) properly denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking suppression of the identification testimony of the complainant and another witness to the robbery. The People satisfied their initial burden of establishing the lack of any undue suggestiveness in the lineup procedure, and defendant failed to satisfy his ultimate burden of proving that the lineup was unduly suggestive *(see, People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 335, *cert denied*498 US 833). The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request to call defense counsel as a witness concerning the circumstances of the lineup where it was clear from defendant’s offer of proof that counsel’s testimony would be cumulative *(see, People v Christenson,*188 AD2d 659, 660, *lv denied*81 NY2d 968). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Balio, JJ.
From: Bob Wr ight/RTP/USEPA/US To: Elkins.Joe@epamail.epa.gov, Gary McAlister/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Conniesue Oldham/RTP/USEPA/US, Michael Papp/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jo

Shanis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/31/2005 09:41 AM Subject: Scott - Marrin's Suggestions about Revisions to EPA Traceability Protocol for Gaseous Calibration Standards

----- Forwarded by Bob W right/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/31/2005 09:35 AM -----

Jack Marrin <jack@marrin.com> 01/30/2005 06:39 PM To: Bob Wr ight/ RTP/USEPA/US@EPA cc: Subject: EPAProtocolComments2004.doc 

### Dear Bob, I have attached m y comments to your recent request for EPA Protocol Gas suggestions. I will call tomorrow to verify that you have received the document. Thanks, Jack Marrin, President Scott- Marrin, Inc
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                              ROSLYN BANCORP, INC.
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                THREE MONTHS              NINE MONTHS
                                                                                    ENDED                     ENDED
                                                                              SEPTEMBER 30, 1997       SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
                                                                            --------------------       -------------------
<S>                                                                             <C>                       <C>  
Net income..................................................................    $         11,034          $         23,965
                                                                                ----------------          ----------------
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding..................................          39,832,697                40,241,086
 
Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect of stock options............                   -                         -
                                                                                ----------------          ----------------
 
Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding............          39,832,697                40,241,086
                                                                                ================          ================
 
Primary earnings per common and common share equivalents....................    $           0.28          $           0.60
                                                                                ================          ================
 
Total weighted average common shares and equivalents outstanding............          39,832,697                40,241,086
 
Additional dilutive shares using ending period market value versus
  average market value for the period when utilizing the treasury
  stock method regarding stock options......................................                   -                         -
                                                                                ----------------          ----------------
 
Total shares for fully diluted earnings per share..........................          39,832,697                40,241,086
                                                                                ================          ================
 
Fully diluted earnings per common and common share equivalents..............    $           0.28          $           0.60
                                                                                ================          ================
</TABLE>

                                      32
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2469 

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on certain semi-manufactured 

forms of gold. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the duty suspension on certain semimanufactured forms of gold. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SEMI-MANUFACTURED FORMS OF 

4 GOLD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.71.08 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2003’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or with-
2 

•HR 2469 IH 

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this 

3 Act. 

4 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwith5 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or 

6 any other provision of law, the entry of any article— 

7 (A) that was made on or after January 1, 

8 2004, and before the 15th day after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act, and 

10 (B) with respect to which there would have 

11 been no duty if the amendment made by 

12 subseciton (a) were in effect on the date of such 

13 entry, 

14 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amend15 ment applied to such entry, and any amounts owed 

16 shall be paid to the importer of record. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.10

     AGREEMENT ON TRANSFER OF SHARES OF HENAN ZHONGPIN FOOD SHARE CO., LTD.
    DATED MAY 23, 2005 BETWEEN SI SHUI CHI AND HENAN ZHONGPIN FOOD CO., LTD.

             Si Shui Chi transfers to Henan Zhongpin Food Co., Ltd. 714,227
shares of the common stock of Henan Zhongpin Food Share Co., Ltd. (the
"Operating Company"), par value RMB 1.00, representing approximately 4.75% of
the Operating Company's issued and outstanding shares. Upon completion of the
stock transfer, Si Shui Chi shall still hold 79,358 shares of the Operating
Company's common stock, representing approximately 0.53% of the Operating
Company's issued and outstanding shares.
#### Warren Nardin et al., Doing Business as Nardin and Radoczy, Respondents, v. M. Mal Deitch, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for an anticipatory breach of a contract and to recover for work, labor and services performed and goods furnished pursuant to said contract, the defendant M. Mai Deitch appeals: (1) from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 19, 1960, after a jury trial, as is in favor of plaintiffs and against him; and (2) from an order of said court, dated February 25, 1960, which directs that interest of $1,643.08 be added to the judgment. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40636

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE ORTIZ-ESQUIVEL

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:08-CR-115-1

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Ortiz-Esquivel

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ortiz-Esquivel has filed a response. Our

independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Ortiz-Esquivel’s response

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40636

2

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Ortiz-Esquivel’s

motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.
#### § 237.08 Event of Default; Application for Compensation; payment.

At any time after an Event of Default, as this term is defined in an Eligible Note, any Noteholder hereunder, or the Fiscal Agent on behalf of a Noteholder hereunder, may file with USAID an Application for Compensation in the form provided in Appendix A to this part. USAID shall pay or cause to be paid to any such Applicant any compensation specified in such Application for Compensation that is due to the Applicant pursuant to the Guarantee as a Loss of Investment not later than the Guarantee Payment Date. In the event that USAID receives any other notice of an Event of Default, USAID may pay any compensation that is due to any Noteholder pursuant to a Guarantee, whether or not such Noteholder has filed with USAID an Application for Compensation in respect of such amount.
§ 401.24 Expenses of proceedings. ( a ) The expenses of those participating in any proceeding under this subpart B shall be borne by the participants.
( b ) The Commission, after due notice to the participant or participants concerned, may require that any unusual cost or expense to the Commission shall be paid by the person on whose behalf or at whose request such unusual cost or expense has been or will be incurred.
EXHIBIT 10.3










EXHIBIT 10.3






	
  Name and Principal Position

  	

  Additional

  Awards*

  
	

  

 	

  

 
	
  Michael H. Madison - President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
  $108,301

  
	
  Dilek Samil - President and Chief Operating Officer (Cleco Power LLC)

  	
  $77,279

  
	
  Kathleen F. Nolen - Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

  	
  $18,160

  
	
  R. O'Neal Chadwick, Jr. - Senior Vice President and General Counsel

  	
  $57,879

  
	
  Samuel H. Charlton III - Senior Vice President and Chief Operating
  Officer (Cleco Midstream Resources LLC)

  	
  $69,128

  



* Subject to possible reduction
by the Committee prior to payment.
exv4w5






Exhibit 4.5




Translation of the Chinese original




Agreement



Party A: Wong Hing Tuen, Male, Birthdate: July 31, 1975, Hong Kong resident, Home Return Permit No.: 376919870957, Hong Kong ID: K802751



Party B: Xu Qiming, Male, Birthdate: April 28, 1969, domiciled at A4, Wukeng Village West, Longhu Town, Jinjiang City, Fujian Province, ID: 350382196904285010



After sufficient friendly negotiations between Party A and Party B, the parties hereto have reached
an agreement as follows on a voluntary and equal basis:





	1.	 	Party A established Fujian Xiniya Garments and Weaving Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) according to
the approval an titled “Official Reply Approving the Establishment of ‘Fujian Xiniya Garments
and Weaving Co. Ltd.’ ([2005] No. 470) issued by Jinjiang City Commerce Department on September
7, 2005. The Company has a total investment of HK$12.0 million and a registered capital of
HK$10.0 million and is located in Liangzhongchang, Jinjiang City.
	 
	2.	 	The Company was actually invested by Party B (Xu Qiming) under the name of Party A (Wong Hing
Tuen). The actual investor of the Company is Party B, and all the assets of the Company
(including the total investment of HK$12.0 million and the registered capital of HK$10.0
million which are contributed in spot exchange; the total investment consisting of certain
equipment purchased in China equivalent to HS$3.85 million, cash HK$6.15 million and
additional investment of HK$2.0 million) fully belong to Party B. All the creditors’ rights
and newly increased assets (including the residual assets after the cessation of operation)
generated during the production and operation of the Company shall fully belong to Party B.
The debt (including tax liabilities) incurred in the Company’s operation should all be paid
off by Party B, and shall have nothing to do with Party A.
	 
	3.	 	Given Party A did not make any actual investment, Party A shall not involve himself in the
Company’s operation and management and shall not have the right to participate in the
distribution of the Company’s net profit, nor does he have the right to dispose of any of the
Company’s properties. Being the sole actual investor of the Company, Party B shall have all
the power for the management and operation of the Company, including the decision-making right
with respect to all the business affairs of the Company. Party B has the exclusive right to
own, use, benefit from and dispose of the Company’s assets. As a result, all the creditors’
right and debts formed in the Company’s operation have nothing to do with Party A. Party A
shall give his cooperation necessary for the Company to go through relevant formalities in
connection with the operation of the Company.




This agreement is the expression of the true intention of both parties hereto.



This agreement shall be executed in two counterparts with equal force and effect, one for each
party; and shall take effect upon dully execution of both parties.




			
	 	 	 
	Party A: /s/ Wong Hing Tuen
	 	Party B: /s/ Xu Qiming
	 	 	 
	 
	 	Date: September 28, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

          - [FE Docket No. 04-121-NG]

# AGENCY:

Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

# ACTION:

Notice of order.

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Fossil Energy (FE) gives notice that it issued DOE/FE Order No. 2051 granting Cascade Natural Gas Corporation authority to import up to .5 billion cubic feet of natural gas annually from Canada, over a term of five years that began on November 1, 2004. The natural gas will be imported under a Base Contract for Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas with IGI Resources, Inc.

                        This Order may be found on the FE Web site at                         *http://www.fe.doe.gov*                         (select gas regulation). It is also available for inspection and copying in the Office of Natural Gas Regulatory Activities Docket Room, 3E-033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0334, (202) 586-9478. The Docket Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.                    

      ( print page 76458)    
Issued in Washington, DC, December 9, 2004.

R.F. Corbin,

Manager, Natural Gas Regulatory Activities, Office of Global Supply and Security, Office of Fossil Energy.

[FR Doc. 04-27866 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P