alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

5) IV-B-1 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:51 AM Sheet 5 of 232 

p.1 
• o 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

P.2 

A-67-i i 

12 -6 ~ oJL 

OCT 5198T 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Status of Suggested Revisions 

Vehicle Safety Requirements 

to OMCS Heavy-Duty 

FROM: 

TO: 

THRU: 

Paul M. Laing, chemical Engineer 

Standards Development and Support Branch <r 

%JL,o>& 

The Record 

Glenn W. Passavant, Senior Project Manager ^UQ**1'-' v*AA*uro>^ 

Standards Development and Support, Branch 

Chester J. France, Chie 

Standards Development a 

The Office of Motor Carrier Safety (OMCS) requires all 

liquid fuel tanks (on heavy-duty vehicles) over 25 gallons in 

capacity to be able to accept fuel at a rate of 20 gallons per 

minute (gpm). Earlier this year (May 27), we suggested a 

change to this requirement in response to the OMCS February 26, 

1987 request for comment (52 FR 5892) on the proposed revisions 

to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. At the time 

of our suggestion, our draft NPRM contained provisions to limit 

future in-use gasoline dispensing rates to ten gpm, (and since 

that time we have formally proposed this requirement). 

Therefore, we suggested the OMCS minimum fill rate requirement 

be changed for gasoline fuel tanks to specify a minimum 

acceptance rate of ten gpm. 

On September 11, 1987, I received a phone call from Jim 

Britell of OMCS informing me of the status of our suggested 

revision. Because our comments were on a section of the OMCS 

regulations which were not directly part of the OMCS proposal 

in February, the fill rate requirement will not get changed in 

the upcoming final rule. However, OMCS intends to change this 

requirement as we have suggested at a later date through an 

additional proposal and final rule. They anticipated this 

would delay the change by approximately six months over how 

long it would have taken had they been able to make the change 

through the current proposal. Even with this delay, the OMCS 

revisions would be made well in advance of our proposed onboard 

requirements. 
P.3 

'?> 

As part of our May 27, 1987 comments, we also suggested 

that OMCS should include provisions in their regulations for 

the proper handling of evaporative emission control systems 

during the safety testing of HDGV fuel tanks. Jim Britell 

informed me that OMCS intends to investigate this suggestion at 

a later date. The specific timing of this investigation was 

not made clear. 

cc: Docket A-87-11
(March 8, 1978)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Calvin Turner, Petitioner, v Eugene S. Le Fevre, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Application dated January 17, 1978, treated as a petition pursuant to CPLR 7002 (subd [b], par 2) for writ of habeas corpus. Petition denied as legally insufficient (see *People ex rel. Hirschberg v Close,*1 NY2d 258). Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Staley, Jr., Larkin and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
### §6671. Authorization of appropriations

(a) For the purpose of carrying out subchapter II of this chapter, there are authorized to be appropriated—

(1) $750,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976;

(2) $500,000 for the period beginning July 1, 1976, and ending September 30, 1976;

(3) $3,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1977; and

(4) such sums as may be necessary for each of the succeeding fiscal years.

(b) For the purpose of carrying out subchapter III of this chapter, there are authorized to be appropriated—

(1) $750,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976;

(2) $500,000 for the period beginning July 1, 1976, and ending September 30, 1976;

(3) $1,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1977; and

(4) such sums as may be necessary for each of the succeeding fiscal years.

(Pub. L. 94–282, title V, §501, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 472.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 240

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 240 appear at 57 FR 36501, Aug. 13, 1992, and 57 FR 47409, Oct. 16, 1992.

#### § 240.21F-15 No amnesty.

The Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection provisions do not provide amnesty to individuals who provide information to the Commission. The fact that you may become a whistleblower and assist in Commission investigations and enforcement actions does not preclude the Commission from bringing an action against you based upon your own conduct in connection with violations of the Federal securities laws. If such an action is determined to be appropriate, however, the Commission will take your cooperation into consideration in accordance with its Policy Statement Concerning Cooperation by Individuals in Investigations and Related Enforcement Actions (17 CFR 202.12).
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T18:56:53-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Editorial Note on Part 62
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 62 appear at 64 FR 54539, Oct. 7, 1999, and 67 FR 17612, 17613, Apr. 11, 2002.

§ 62.7 Redesignation. ( a ) Sponsors must file for redesignation no more than six months and no fewer than three months before the designation expiration date as set forth in the sponsor's letter of designation or its most recent letter of redesignation.
( b ) A sponsor seeking redesignation as an Exchange Visitor Program sponsor must first complete and submit Form DS-3036 in SEVIS. The complete application must consist of: ( 1 ) A completed copy of Form DS-3036, signed by the sponsor's Chief Financial Officer, President or other executive with legal authority to make commitments on behalf of the sponsor (as identified in the organization's governing documents);
( 2 ) Required supporting documentation and certifications as set forth in paragraph (c); and
( 3 ) Confirmation of payment of the required non-refundable application fee through pay.gov as set forth in § 62.17.
( c ) The complete application must include the following supporting documentation and certifications: ( 1 ) A copy of the most recent year-end financial statements;
( 2 ) A copy of the most recent letter of accreditation if the sponsor is a secondary or post-secondary academic institution;
( 3 ) A list of the names, addresses and citizenship or legal permanent resident status of the current members of its Board of Directors or the Board of Trustees or other like body, vested with the management of the organization or partnership, and/or the percentage of stocks/shares held, as applicable;
( 4 ) For a non-profit organization, a signed copy of the sponsor's most recent Form 990 filed with the Internal Revenue Service;
( 5 ) A statement signed by the Chief Executive Officer, President, or other executive with legal authority to make commitments on behalf of the sponsor (as identified in the organization's governing documents) certifying that the sponsor has completed timely criminal background checks since the date of the last designation or redesignation letter on the Responsible Officer and all Alternate Responsible Officers and has determined their suitability for these positions; and
( 6 ) Such additional information or documentation that the Department of State may deem necessary to evaluate the application.
( d ) Upon its favorable determination that a sponsor meets all statutory and regulatory requirements, the Department of State may, in its sole discretion, redesignate the organization as an Exchange Visitor Program sponsor for one or two years. A sponsor seeking re-designation may continue to operate its program(s) until such time as the Department of State notifies it of a decision to approve, amend or terminate its designation.
[79 FR 60307, Oct. 6, 2014]
#### In the Matter of Marc J. Hopkins, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[832 NYS2d 833]

Order of suspension entered pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.20 (e). Present—Gorski, J.P, Lunn, Fahey, Green and Pine, JJ. (Filed Apr. 4, 2007.)
#### Linda Lohfink, Respondent, v Friends Industries, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, defendants Friends Industries, Inc., and Patricia Dank appeal from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered November 16, 1977, as denied the corporate defendant’s motion to strike a set of written interrogatories served upon it by the plaintiff and (2) a further order of the same court, entered December 30, 1977, which (a) granted plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to the extent of requiring the corporate defendant to answer the interrogatories within 15 days from the service upon it of a copy of said order together with notice of entry thereof and (b) denied the corporate defendant’s motion for a stay. The appeals by defendant Patricia Dank from both orders are dismissed for lack of standing (see CPLR 5511). On the appeals by defendant Friends Industries, Inc., orders affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff to cover both appeals, payable jointly by defendants-appellants. The 15-day period specified in the order entered December 30, 1977 shall commence with the service -upon the corporate defendant of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry thereof. No opinion. Latham, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.
### §6612. Director; Associate Directors

#### (a) In general

There shall be at the head of the Office a Director who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who shall be compensated at the rate provided for level II of the Executive Schedule in section 5313 of title 5.

#### (b) Associate Directors

The President is authorized to appoint not more than four Associate Directors, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, who shall be compensated at a rate not to exceed that provided for level III of the Executive Schedule in section 5314 of such title. Associate Directors shall perform such functions as the Director may prescribe.

#### (c) Chief Technology Officer

Subject to subsection (b), the President is authorized to designate 1 of the Associate Directors under that subsection as a United States Chief Technology Officer.

(Pub. L. 94–282, title II, §203, May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 463; Pub. L. 114–329, title VI, §604(b), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 3037.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 114–329, §604(b)(1), (2), designated first sentence of existing provisions as subsec. (a) and second and third sentences of existing provisions as subsec. (b) and inserted headings.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–329, §604(b)(3), added subsec. (c).
Case 3:09-cr-01001-MMC Document 41 Filed 04/15/10 Page 1 of 2
April 15, 2010

Case 3:09-cr-01001-MMC Document 41 Filed 04/15/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 213.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part prescribes standards and procedures for the collection and disposal of claims due to the United States from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). This part covers USAID's administrative actions to collect claims/debts (including administrative and salary offsets; compromise; suspension or termination of collection actions; transfer and/or referral of claims to the U.S. Departments of the Treasury and Justice). The terms “claim” and “debt” are synonymous and interchangeable. They refer to an amount of money, funds, or property that an appropriate USAID official has determined to be due to the United States from any person, organization, or entity except another Federal Department or Agency.
( b ) *Scope.* The standards and procedures in this part are applicable to all claims and debts for which a statute, regulation, or contract does not prescribe different standards or procedures.
( c ) *Applicability.* This part does not apply to USAID: ( 1 ) Claims arising out of loans for which compromise and collection authority is conferred by section 635(g)(2) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended;
( 2 ) Claims arising from investment guaranty operations for which settlement and arbitration authority is conferred by section 635(l) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended;
( 3 ) Claims against any foreign country or any political subdivision thereof, or any public international organization;
( 4 ) Claims where the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) determines that the achievement of the purposes of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, or any other provision of law administered by USAID require a different course of action;
( 5 ) Claims owed USAID by other Federal Departments and Agencies. Such debts will be resolved by negotiation between the Departments/Agencies; and
( 6 ) Claims that appear to be fraudulent, false, or misrepresented by a party with an interest in the claim except to the extent provided in § 213.4.
[86 FR 31140, June 11, 2021]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Pagan, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed May 9, 1977, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree from an indeterminate term of from four years to life imprisonment to an indeterminate term of from two years to life imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Hopkins, J. P., Martuscello, Latham and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 3, 2005.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis**                     (Randall C. Sumner, Vice President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:                

*1. Martin B. Rowe*, Harrisburg, Illinois, individually and as a member of the Rowe Family Control Group, which consists of Martin B. Rowe, the Burt H. Rowe, Jr. Marital Trust and the Anne Rowe Family Trust, all of Harrisburg, Illinois; Marianna R. Deal, Rachelle L. Rowe, and Caroline C. Rowe, all of St. Louis, Missouri; and Anne Rowe, Destin, Florida; to acquire control of First Eldorado Bancshares, Inc., Eldorado, Illinois, and thereby indirectly acquire control of Dana Bancorp, Inc., Dana, Indiana, The First National Bank of Dana, Dana Indiana, and First State Bank of Eldorado, Eldorado, Illinois.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 13, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-27578 Filed 12-15-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
PUBLIC LAW 111–276—OCT. 13, 2010 124 STAT. 2899 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4543: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Apr. 26, considered and passed House. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–276 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4285 Payne 

Avenue in San Jose, California, as the ‘‘Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ANTHONY J. CORTESE POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4285 Payne Avenue in San Jose, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Anthony J. Cortese Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Anthony J. Cortese Post Office Building’’. 

Approved October 13, 2010. 

Oct. 13, 2010 

[H.R. 4543] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 519.300 Professional and technical services. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 519.100 (a), does not apply in the case of any reasonable payment to a person, other than an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action, if the payment is for professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any bid, proposal, or application for that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement or for meeting requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving that Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) The reporting requirements in § 519.110 (a) and (b) regarding filing a disclosure form by each person, if required, shall not apply with respect to professional or technical services rendered directly in the preparation, submission, or negotiation of any commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, “professional and technical services” shall be limited to advice and analysis directly applying any professional or technical discipline. For example, drafting or a legal document accompanying a bid or proposal by a lawyer is allowable. Similarly, technical advice provided by an engineer on the performance or operational capability of a piece of equipment rendered directly in the negotiation of a contract is allowable. However, communications with the intent to influence made by a professional (such as a licensed lawyer) or a technical person (such as a licensed accountant) are not allowable under this section unless they provide advice and analysis directly applying their professional or technical expertise and unless the advice or analysis is rendered directly and solely in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action. Thus, for example, communications with the intent to influence made by a lawyer that do not provide legal advice or analysis directly and solely related to the legal aspects of his or her client's proposal, but generally advocate one proposal over another are not allowable under this section because the lawyer is not providing professional legal services. Similarly, communications with the intent to influence made by an engineer providing an engineering analysis prior to the preparation or submission of a bid or proposal are not allowable under this section since the engineer is providing technical services but not directly in the preparation, submission or negotiation of a covered Federal action.
( d ) Requirements imposed by or pursuant to law as a condition for receiving a covered Federal award include those required by law or regulation, or reasonably expected to be required by law or regulation, and any other requirements in the actual award documents.
( e ) Persons other than officers or employees of a person requesting or receiving a covered Federal action include consultants and trade associations.
( f ) Only those services expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Place:

450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

# Announcement of Additional Meeting:

Additional meeting. 

An Open Meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 22, 2004 at 10 a.m. in Room 1C30, the William O. Douglas Room. 

Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Open Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 22, 2004 will be: 

1. The Commission will consider a staff recommendation regarding the application of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to certain broker-dealers. (See Proposed Rule, IA-1845, and Reopening of Comment Period, IA-2278). 

      ( print page 76797)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Tuleya, Senior Counsel, Division of Investment Management, at (202) 942-0719. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070. 

Dated: December 17, 2004. 

Jonathan G. Katz, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-28053 Filed 12-17-04; 4:03 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P