alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11-i

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

11.1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-1

11.2 PURCHASE PRICE INCREASES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-1
11-1

CHAPTER 11. LIFE-CYCLE COST SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS

11.1 INTRODUCTION

The life-cycle cost (LCC) sub-group analysis evaluates impacts on any identifiable

groups or customers who may be disproportionately affected by any national energy-efficiency

standard level. This will be accomplished, in part, by analyzing the LCC and payback periods

for those customers that fall into any identifiable groups. The Department will conduct this

analysis during the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) stage of this rulemaking.

In the NOPR stage, the Department plans to evaluate variations in regional energy prices

and variations in energy use that might affect the net present value (NPV) of a standard to

customer sub-populations. To the extent possible, the Department will obtain estimates of the

variability of each input parameter and will consider this variability in its calculation of customer

impacts. Variations in energy use for a particular equipment type depend on factors such as

climate and building type. The Department plans to perform sensitivity analyses to consider

how differences in energy use will affect sub-groups of customers.

The Department will determine the impact on customer sub-groups using the LCC

spreadsheet model. The spreadsheet model used for the LCC analysis can be used with different

data inputs. The standard LCC analysis (described in Chapter 8) includes residential buildings

that use furnaces and boilers. The LCC for any sub-group of national population, can be

analyzed using the LCC spreadsheet model by sampling only that sub-group. (Chapter 8

explains in detail the inputs to the spreadsheet used in determining life-cycle cost and payback

periods.) 

11.2 PURCHASE PRICE INCREASES

The Department will be especially sensitive to increases in the purchase price of

equipment, to avoid negative impacts on identifiable population groups, such as low income

consumers (i.e., those with low annual income), that may not be able to afford significant

increases in equipment price. For such customers that are sensitive to price increases, increases

in first costs of a product can preclude the purchase of a new model of that product. As a result,

some customers may retain products past their useful life. These older products are generally

less efficient to begin with, and their efficiency may deteriorate further if they are retained

beyond their useful life. Increases in first cost also can preclude the purchase and use of a

product altogether, resulting in a potentially large loss of utility to the customer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          51,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,347
<PP&E>                                       1,068,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,310,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,746
<BONDS>                                        340,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                     473,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,310,195
<SALES>                                         61,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,352
<CGS>                                           37,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,564
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,783
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (27,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (27,584)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.68)


</TABLE>
#### § 230.01 Purpose.

The purpose of this regulation is to prescribe the procedures and standard terms and conditions applicable to loan guarantees issued for the benefit of the Government of Israel on behalf of the State of Israel (“Borrower”), pursuant to the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2003, Public Law 108-11, as amended by Section 534(p) of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2005; Division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Public Law 108-447; Section 13(b) of the Department of State Authorities Act, 2006, Public Law 109-472; and Section 5(b) of the United States-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012, Public Law 112-150. The loan guarantees will apply to sums borrowed from time to time between March 1, 2003 and September 30, 2016, not exceeding an aggregate total of nine billion United States Dollars ($9,000,000,000) in principal amount. The loan guarantees shall insure the Borrower's repayment of 100% of principal and interest due under such loans. The full faith and credit of the United States of America is pledged for the full payment and performance of such guarantee obligations. The loan guarantees will be issued pursuant to an Amended and Restated Loan Guarantee Commitment Agreement between the Borrower and the United States Government dated October 24, 2012.
Editorial Note on Part 710
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

§ 710.11 Appeal. ( a ) Within 20 days of the date of the initial decision, either party may appeal the decision to the President of DFC. The President's decision on such appeal shall be based solely on the record of the proceedings or those portions thereof cited by the parties to limit the issues.
( b ) If the President modifies or reverses the examiner's decision, the President shall specify such findings of fact and conclusions of law as are different from those of the examiner.
( c ) The decision of the President on appeal, shall constitute final administrative decision. An initial decision of the examiner which has not been appealed during the 20-day period provided shall become a final administrative decision on the twenty-first day.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 25, 2024

No. 04

- 24

- 00 158

- CV

IN RE BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Relator

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On March 6 , 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus

. After considering the petition

, the record, the response filed by real parties in interest, and relator’s reply, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8.

It is so ORDERED on September 25 , 2024.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25 th day of September, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2022

- CI

- 14131 & 2022

- CI

- 14159 , pending in the 407th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding.
State of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority

**Page 1 of 2**

**G:\AIRW-EN\AD\AD G200\AD 27-10-11-03 Centering spri ng Rod\AD 27-20-11-03.doc**  AD 27-10-11-03 Date: December 06, 2010

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

**This Airworthiness Directive, issued by the Civil A viation Administration in accordance with the**  **Israeli Air Navigation Regulations applies to an ai rcraft for which our records list you as the**  **registered owner. It affects aviation safety and re quires your immediate attention. No person may**  **operate an aircraft to which an Airworthiness Direc tive applies, except in accordance with that** 

**Directive**

.

APPLIES TO **: GALP model GALAXY and Gulfstream 200 aircraft ser ial numbers 004** 

**through 231 certificated in any category.**

SUBJECT: **One-time detailed inspection of the aileron & eleva tor servo actuator** 

**centering spring rods to verify the rods integrity.**

REASON: **A broken aileron servo actuator centering spring r od was discovered on a** 

**model G100 aircraft during a routine scheduled main tenance inspection.**  **This centering spring rod is common to all Gulfstre am Mid Cabin model**  **(G100, G150 and G200) aileron control servo actuato rs and the G200** 

**elevator control servo actuator too. The function o f the centering spring rod** 

**is to maintain the affected servo actuator and its associated flight control**  **surface in a centered position in the event of a di sconnect of the normal**  **mechanical control system input from the flight cre w to the same servo**  **actuator. This latent failure of a centering spring rod, if not detected and**  **corrected, in conjunction with the disconnection of the normal mechanical**  **control system of the same servo actuator would lea d to loss a control of the**  **flight control surface. This condition would reduce the control capability**  **of the airplane and imposes a higher workload on the f**  **light crew reducing their ability to cope with adverse operating conditions.** 

ACTION: **Inspect the aileron & elevator servo actuator spri ng rods per Gulfstream** 

**Service Bulletin No. 200-27-374. Accomplishment of the one-time inspection requireme**  **nts of this AD does not cancel the repetitive inspection required by In**  **structions for Continued**

**Airworthiness.**State of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority

**Page 2 of 2**

**G:\AIRW-EN\AD\AD G200\AD 27-10-11-03 Centering spri ng Rod\AD 27-20-11-03.doc**  COMPLIANCE **: Unless already accomplished, comply with this AD at the next suitable** 

**planned maintenance inspection within the next 12 m onths from the** 

**effective date of this AD**

EFECTIVE DATE **: January 10, 2011.**

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT **: Mr Boaz Keren, Engineering Branch, CAAI - P.O.Box 1101, Golan Street, Airport City, Israel, 7**  **0151 Telephone: 972-3-9774549, Fax: 972-3- 9774592, e-mail: kerenb@mot.gov.il**
#### § 224.25 Fees.

The party requesting a subpoena shall pay the cost of the fee and mileage of any witness subpoenaed in the amounts that would be payable to a witness in a proceeding in the United States District Court. A check for witness fees and mileage shall accompany the subpoena when served, except that when a subpoena is issued on behalf of A.I.D., a check for witness fees and mileage need not accompany the subpoena.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOUGLAS R. CARAWAY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 08-cv-04371-MMC 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO 

SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF 

DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH 

CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE 

COURT'S STANDING ORDERS

On August 29, 2016, defendant Fremont Bank electronically filed its "Limited 

Opposition of Fremont Bank to Defendant Douglas R. Caraway's Motion for Relief From 

Order FRCP 60(b), FRCP 60(c)." Defendant has violated the Civil Local Rules of this 

District and the Court's Standing Orders, however, by failing "to provide for chambers a 

paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked 'Chambers Copy'." 

See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The 

Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.

Defendant is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the 

Court's Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Defendant is hereby advised that if it in the future to comply with 

the Court's Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed 

document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 

record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely 

provided to the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 8, 2016

MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04371-MMC Document 182 Filed 09/08/16 Page 1 of 1
Pathfinder
$f Reservoir

Medicine Bow

MM 1/4 Mile No Surface Occupancy o 10 _ 20 40 60 80 100

Miles

Map 2-48
Historic Trails
Alternative 4

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM
§ 46.4 Procedure in case of alien prevented from departing from the United States. ( a ) Any alien, other than an enemy alien, whose departure has been temporarily prevented under the provisions of § 46.2 may, within 15 days of the service upon him of the written order temporarily preventing his departure, request a hearing before a special inquiry officer. The alien's request for a hearing shall be made in writing and shall be addressed to the district director having administrative jurisdiction over the alien's place of residence. If the alien's request for a hearing is timely made, the district director shall schedule a hearing before a special inquiry officer, and notice of such hearing shall be given to the alien. The notice of hearing shall, as specifically as security considerations permit, inform the alien of the nature of the case against him, shall fix the time and place of the hearing, and shall inform the alien of his right to be represented, at no expense to the Government, by counsel of his own choosing.
( b ) Every alien for whom a hearing has been scheduled under paragraph (a) of this section shall be entitled ( 1 ) to appear in person before the special inquiry officer,
( 2 ) to be represented by counsel of his own *choice,*
( 3 ) to have the opportunity to be heard and to present evidence,
( 4 ) to cross-examine the witnesses who appear at the hearing, except that if, in the course of the examination, it appears that further examination may divulge information of a confidential or security nature, the special inquiry officer may, in his discretion, preclude further examination of the witness with respect to such matters,
( 5 ) to examine any evidence in possession of the Government which is to be considered in the disposition of the case, provided that such evidence is not of a confidential or security nature the disclosure of which would be prejudicial to the interests of the United States,
( 6 ) to have the time and opportunity to produce evidence and witnesses on his own behalf, and
( 7 ) to reasonable continuances upon request, for good cause shown.
( c ) Any special inquiry officer who is assigned to conduct the hearing provided for in this section shall have the authority to: ( 1 ) Administer oaths and affirmations,
( 2 ) present and receive evidence,
( 3 ) interrogate, examine, and cross-examine under oath or affirmation both the alien and witnesses,
( 4 ) rule upon all objections to the introduction of evidence or motions made during the course of the hearing,
( 5 ) take or cause depositions to be taken,
( 6 ) issue subpoenas, and
( 7 ) take any further action consistent with applicable provisions of law, executive orders, proclamations, and regulations.
[22 FR 10828, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 27 FR 1358, Feb. 14, 1962]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,J. Keith Kitchen, Chief Financial Officer of Intellisync Corporation (the“Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

•                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:June 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ J. KEITH KITCHEN       |   |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| **J.  Keith Kitchen**      |   |   |
| *Chief  Financial Officer* |   |   |

 

----
exhibit10a.htm










Exhibit 10(a)













	
Appendix A2


Last Revised On: August 16, 2010


	
Name

	
Company

	
Pre-4/1/1997 Participant

	
Class A “Bonus SERP” Status

	
Double Basic Credits

	
Double Transition Credits


	
BENNETT, CHRISTOPHER A. *

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	
 

	
X1

	
X1

	  
	
FRANCIS, SHAUN J. *

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	  	
X1

	
X1

	  
	
KELLIHER, JOSEPH T. *

	
Florida Power & Light Company

	
 

	
X1

	
X1

	  
	
MCGRATH, ROBERT L. 2*

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	
 

	
X1

	
X1

	
X1


	
RODRIGUEZ, ANTONIO *

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	
X

	
 

	
 

	  
	
SIEVING, CHARLES E. *

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	  	
X1

	
X1

	  
	
CUTLER, PAUL I. *

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	
 

	
X1

	
 

	  
	
FROGGATT, CHRIS N. *

	
NextEra Energy, Inc

	  	
X1

	  	  











	
 


   1

	
 


The Compensation Committee has expressly identified these items and acknowledged that they are subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.  In particular, these items include: (i) the additional deferred compensation provided by the designation of certain officers as Class A Executives, effective on or after January 1, 2006; and (ii) the additional deferred compensation set forth in SERP Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan (meaning amounts deferred by certain senior officers specified by the Compensation Committee who became participants in the SERP on or after April 1, 1997 at the rate of two times the basic credit and, to the extent applicable, the transition credit under the cash balance formula in the SERP for their pensionable earnings on or after January 1, 2006).  Importantly, nothing in Amendment #4 to the Prior Plan, the SERP, Compensation Committee resolutions, or any other document shall be construed as subjecting to Code Section 409A any deferrals made under the SERP prior to January 1, 2005, except as expressly noted herein.


	
   2

	
Due to material modification of the SERP benefit pursuant to Executive Retention Employment Agreements entered into after December 31, 2004, no amount of the SERP benefit for Mr. McGrath is eligible for grandfathered treatment under Code Section 409A.


 


	
  *

	
Executive Officer of NextEra Energy, Inc.
#### James E. Bennet, Respondent, v. Breitenbach Chemists, Inc., Appellant.

Determination of the Appellate Term and final order of the Municipal Court reversed,-on the law, and the petition dismissed, with costs to the appellant in this court and in the Appellate Term. The statute (Business Rent Law, § 8, subd. [k]; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.) provides that the proposed lease with the prospective tenant (required to be matched by the present tenant) shall be *“*non-caneellable except for the violation of any term or obligation of such lease ”. The proposed lease here did not meet these requirements. The proposed lease contained provisions authorizing an assignment by the individual prospective tenants to a corporation to be formed by them, with at least 51% *934of the stock to be owned by them, in which event it was provided that all liability on their part should '• cease and terminate and there shall be no further responsibility on the part of the said individuals by reason of the execution of the within lease And, as we read the lease, the assignment and consequent release of named tenants are effective without the corporation’s assuming the terms of the lease. Thus, the individually named tenants in the proposed lease have it within their power by an assignment to be relieved of liability under the lease and the landlord may not hold the assignee corporation to the lease. So, we have here, in effect, a lease which is cancelable by the individual tenants by their unilateral act of assigning to a corporation to be formed by them. In fact, the lease here is in effect so written that it could bind one of two prospective tenants, to wit, the named individuals or their assignee, or be binding on neither; and such a proposed lease is not in compliance with the statute. Motion for a stay dismissed, having become academic by virtue of the decision herein. Concur-— Botein, P. J., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
Mr. Thomas Ronnau

Manager Technical Services

Cessna Aircraft Company

P.O. Box 7706

Wichita, KS 67277 

Dear Ronnau:

We have received your February 26, 2014 correspondence submitted to the Federal Docket

withdrawing your February 7, 2013 petition on behalf of Cessna Aircraft Company for an 

exemption from § 91.409(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

Your letter has been placed in the public docket No. FAA-2001-8741. No further action will 

be taken on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3.1.1 Certificate of Amendment to Articles of incorporation of ERF
Wireless, Inc.

                                                               Filed # C15007-04
                                                                 August 27, 2004
Certificate of Amendment
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390)

        Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation For Nevada
                              Profit Corporations
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of Corporation: ERF Wireless, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available)

Article Seventh has been amended so that:
(1) in no instance shall the board of directors exceed seven members;
(2) a director may be removed on for cause and only by the affirmative vote of
the holders of 60% of the combined voting power of the then outstanding shares
of stock entitled to vote;
(3) members of the board of directors shall be entitled to reasonable fees, or
other compensation, but not salaries, for their services as directors; and
(4) the affirmative vote of 60% of the combined voting power of the then
outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote shall be required to alter, amend,
adopt any provision inconsistent with or repeal this Article Seventh.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is 100%.

4. Effective date of filing (optional):

5. Officer Signature (required) /S/ RICHARD O. WEED
                                -------------------