alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3058f. Definitions

As used in this subpart:

#### (1) Office

The term "Office" means the office established in section 3058g(a)(1)(A) of this title.

#### (2) Ombudsman

The term "Ombudsman" means the individual described in section 3058g(a)(2) of this title.

#### (3) Local Ombudsman entity

The term "local Ombudsman entity" means an entity designated under section 3058g(a)(5)(A) of this title to carry out the duties described in section 3058g(a)(5)(B) of this title with respect to a planning and service area or other substate area.

#### (4) Program

The term "program" means the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program established in section 3058g(a)(1)(B) of this title.

#### (5) Representative

The term "representative" includes an employee or volunteer who represents an entity designated under section 3058g(a)(5)(A) of this title and who is individually designated by the Ombudsman.

#### (6) Resident

The term "resident" means an individual of any age who resides in a long-term care facility.

(Pub. L. 89–73, title VII, §711, as added Pub. L. 102–375, title VII, §702, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1275; amended Pub. L. 114–144, §8(b), Apr. 19, 2016, 130 Stat. 347; Pub. L. 116–131, title II, §202(2), Mar. 25, 2020, 134 Stat. 254.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2020—Par. (6). Pub. L. 116–131 inserted "of any age" after "individual".

2016—Par. (6). Pub. L. 114–144 struck out "older" before "individual".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section inapplicable with respect to fiscal year 1992, see section 905(b)(6) of Pub. L. 102–375, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 3001 of this title.
§ 1000.154 How is the recipient to keep criminal conviction information confidential? ( a ) The recipient will keep all the criminal conviction record information it receives from the official law enforcement agencies listed in § 1000.150 in files separate from all other housing records.
( b ) These criminal conviction records will be kept under lock and key and be under the custody and control of the recipient's housing executive director/lead official and/or his designee for such records.
( c ) These criminal conviction records may only be accessed with the written permission of the Indian tribe's or TDHE's housing executive director/lead official and/or his designee and are only to be used for the purposes stated in section 208 of NAHASDA and these regulations.
### §2372. Date of transfer of utilities

Transfers of utilities shall be made as soon as possible, but in any event, not later than five years after August 4, 1955, in the case of Oak Ridge and Richland, or, in the case of Los Alamos, not later than June 30, 1998.

(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 7, §72, 69 Stat. 480; Pub. L. 87–719, §20, Sept. 28, 1962, 76 Stat. 666; Pub. L. 104–106, div. C, title XXXI, §3161(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 627.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 substituted "not later than June 30, 1998" for "not later than five years after the date it is included within this chapter".

1962—Pub. L. 87–719 inserted "in the case of Oak Ridge and Richland, or, in the case of Los Alamos, not later than five years after the date it is included within this chapter" after "August 4, 1955,".
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2635 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2635

      To amend title 10, United States Code, to require emergency 
  contraception to be available at all military health care treatment 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2005

Mr. Michaud (for himself and Mr. Allen) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 10, United States Code, to require emergency 
  contraception to be available at all military health care treatment 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO MAKE AVAILABLE EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION AT ALL 
              MILITARY HEALTH CARE TREATMENT FACILITIES.

    Section 1074g(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(9)(A) Emergency contraception shall be included on the basic 
core formulary of the uniform formulary.
    ``(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (4), no prior authorization may be 
required for emergency contraception. Nothing in the preceding sentence 
may be construed as waiving any provision of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) or any other provision of law 
administered by the Food and Drug Administration, including rules and 
orders of such Administration under such Act or other provisions of 
law.
    ``(C) In this paragraph, the term `emergency contraception' means a 
drug, drug regimen, or device that is--
            ``(i) approved by the Food and Drug Administration to 
        prevent pregnancy; and
            ``(ii) used postcoitally.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.74 Issuance of new, replacement, or duplicate visas. ( a ) *New immigrant visa for a special immigrant under INA 101(a)(27)(A) and (B).* The consular officer may issue a new immigrant visa to a qualified alien entitled to status under INA 101(a)(27)(A) or (B), provided that: ( 1 ) The alien establishes that the original visa has been lost, mutilated, or has expired; or that the alien will be unable to use it during the period of its validity; and
( 2 ) The alien pays anew the application processing fees prescribed in the Schedule of Fees (22 CFR 22.1); and
( 3 ) The consular officer ascertains whether the original issuing office knows of any reason why a new visa should not be issued.
( b ) *Replacement immigrant visa for an immediate relative or for an alien subject to numerical limitation.* A consular officer may issue a replacement visa under the original number of a qualified alien entitled to status as an immediate relative (INA 201(b)(2)), a family or employment preference immigrant (INA 203(a) or (b)), or a diversity immigrant (INA 203(c)), if— ( 1 ) The alien is unable to use the visa during the period of its validity due to reasons beyond the alien's control;
( 2 ) The visa is issued during the same fiscal year in which the original visa was issued, or in the following year in the case of an immediate relative only, if the original number had been reported as recaptured;
( 3 ) The number has not been returned to the Department as a “recaptured visa number” in the case of a preference or diversity immigrant;
( 4 ) The alien pays anew the application processing fees prescribed in the Schedule of Fees; and
( 5 ) The consular officer ascertains whether the original issuing office knows of any reason why a new visa should not be issued.
( c ) *Replacement visa for adoptees.* A consular officer may issue a replacement immigrant visa to a qualified alien, if the conditions in paragraphs (a)(1) and (3) of this section are met, and if the consular officer determines— ( 1 ) A prior immigrant visa was issued on or after March 27, 2013, to a child who has been lawfully adopted, or who is coming to the United States to be adopted, by a United States citizen;
( 2 ) The inability to use the visa was attributable to factors beyond the control of the adoptee or the adopting parent(s); and
( 3 ) The application processing fee has been waived pursuant to § 42.71(b)(2) or has been paid anew.
( d ) *Duplicate visas issued within the validity period of the original visa.* If the validity of a visa previously issued has not yet terminated and the original visa has been lost or mutilated, a duplicate visa may be issued containing all of the information appearing on the original visa, including the original issuance and expiration dates. The applicant shall execute a new application and provide copies of the supporting documents submitted in support of the original application. The alien must pay anew the application processing fees prescribed in the Schedule of Fees.
[84 FR 35299, July 23, 2019, as amended at 87 FR 2705, Jan. 19, 2022]
#### § 96.64 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,174
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                27,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,148,346
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         245,154
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           244,766
<LOANS>                                        687,398
<ALLOWANCE>                                     23,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,159,301
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,771,208
<SHORT-TERM>                                   692,203
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             59,467
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           436
<OTHER-SE>                                     635,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,159,301
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,785
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               74,159
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,308
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               103,252
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              42,755
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,283
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           48,969
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 343
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 34,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,802
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,802
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,931
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.31
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,708
<LOANS-PAST>                                         4
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,513
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                23,320
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                       200
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               23,795
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         23,795
        


</TABLE>
Note: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RAYMOND E. STAUFFER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

BROOKS BROTHERS, INC., AND RETAIL BRAND 

ALLIANCE, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

AND

UNITED STATES, 

Intervenor-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-1180 

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of New York in No. 08-CV-10369, Judge 

Sidney H. Stein. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION 

______________________

Before PROST, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R 

 Raymond E. Stauffer moves without opposition for an 

extension of time to file his principal brief. Mr. Stauffer 

Case: 13-1180 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 06/27/2013
2 RAYMOND STAUFFER v. BROOKS BROTHERS, INC.

further moves for leave to file an enlarged principal brief 

as well as to supplement the record. Brooks Brothers, 

Inc. and Retail Brand Alliance, Inc. oppose. Mr. Stauffer 

replies. The court construes Mr. Stauffer’s June 20, 2013 

letter as motion to withdraw his motion to supplement 

the record. 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1) The motion to withdraw the motion to supplement 

the record is granted. 

2) The motion to file an enlarged principal brief is 

denied. 

3) The motion for an extension of time is granted. 

Mr. Stauffer’s brief, not to exceed 30 pages, is due within 

21 days of this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 

 /s/ Daniel O’Toole 

 Daniel O’Toole 

 Clerk 

s25 

Case: 13-1180 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 06/27/2013
### §3702. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3702 was editorially reclassified as section 10262 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 501.1 Policy.

It is the policy of the Broadcasting Board of Governors that Foreign Service Officers occupy positions in which there is a need and reasonable opportunity for interchangeability of personnel between the Board and posts abroad, and which are concerned with (a) the conduct, observation, or analysis of information and cultural activities, or (b) the executive management of, or administrative responsibility for, the overseas operations of the Board's program.
§ 1423.10 Determination not to issue complaint; review of action by the Regional Director. ( a ) If the Regional Director determines that the charge has not been timely filed, that the charge fails to state an unfair labor practice, or for other appropriate reasons, the Regional Director may request the charging party to withdraw the charge, and in the absence of such withdrawal within a reasonable time, decline to issue a complaint.
( b ) If the Regional Director determines not to issue a complaint on a charge which is not withdrawn, the Regional Director shall provide the parties with a written statement of the reasons for not issuing a complaint.
( c ) The charging party may obtain a review of the Regional Director's decision not to issue a complaint by filing an appeal with the General Counsel within twenty-five (25) days after service of the Regional Director's decision. The appeal shall contain a complete statement setting forth the facts and reasons upon which it is based. A copy of the appeal shall also be filed with the Regional Director. In addition, the charging party should notify all other parties of the fact that an appeal has been taken, but any failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of the appeal.
( d ) A request for extension of time to file an appeal shall be in writing and received by the General Counsel not later than five (5) days before the date the appeal is due. The charging party should notify the Regional Director and all other parties that it has requested an extension of time in which to file an appeal, but any failure to give such notice shall not affect the validity of its request for an extension of time to file an appeal.
( e ) The General Counsel may sustain the Regional Director's refusal to issue or re-issue a complaint, stating the grounds of affirmance, or may direct the Regional Director to take further action. The General Counsel's decision shall be served on all the parties. The decision of the General Counsel shall be final.
EXHIBIT 32.2



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTS OF 2002


In connection with the Advanced Optics Electronics, Inc. Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J.
Cousins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)    Fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

        (2)    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
               fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
               and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Advanced Optics Electronics, Inc.
and will be retained by Advanced Optics Electronics, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ JOHN J. COUSINS
------------------------------
JOHN J. COUSINS
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)


November 14, 2003
#### § 10.12 Additional rulemaking proceedings.

The Secretary may invite interested persons to present oral arguments, appear at informal hearings, or participate in any other procedure affording opportunity for oral presentation of views. The transcript or minutes of such meetings, as appropriate, will be kept and filed in the Rules Docket.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Science Board Task Force on Red Lessons Learned will meet in closed session on December 16-17, 2004, at SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. This Task Force will assess what useful information can our adversaries learn from U.S. military engagement and, particularly, what might they have learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom; identify the channels through which adversaries learn about U.S. capabilities; is there any evidence an adversary is adjusting to U.S. capabilities and what might the U.S. do to counter this; what are the indicators or observables that the Intelligence Community can focus on to determine if an adversary is engaging in this type of practice and do the indicators change in peacetime or wartime; do different technology insertion models exist; is there any evidence potential adversaries                               ( print page 77741)                            are targeting the seams in the U.S. command and control alignment and planning process; and the preceding areas of concern focus primarily on the military operations phases, are the potential adversaries observing, analyzing and adapting during the preparation and stabilization phase?                    

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, these meetings will be closed to the public.

Dated: November 29, 2004.

Jeannette Owings-Ballard,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 04-28264  Filed 12-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7299

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CARLOS WASHINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-94-464, CA-96-1061-7-20-AK)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Washington, Nos. CR-94-

464; CA-96-1061-7-20-AK (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 710
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 710 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

§ 710.13 Appropriate action. Appropriate action includes: ( a ) Prohibiting the individual from making, on behalf of any other person (except the United States), any formal or informal appearance before, or with the intent to influence, any oral or written communication to, DFC on any matter or business for a period not to exceed five years, which may be accomplished by directing DFC employees to refuse to participate in any such appearance or to accept any such communication.
( b ) Taking other appropriate disciplinary action.
[45 FR 5685, Jan. 24, 1980; 49 FR 18295, Apr. 30, 1984]
#### § 239.9 No acceleration of Eligible Notes.

Eligible Notes shall not be subject to acceleration, in whole or in part, by USAID, the Noteholder or any other party. USAID shall not have the right to pay any amounts in respect of the Eligible Notes other than in accordance with the original payment terms of such Eligible Notes.