alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justin Dean ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10347.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 12, 2007.

Filed March 22, 2007.

*706Don Gifford, U.S. Attorney, Reno, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael D. Powell, Esq., FPDNV — Federal Public Defender’s Office, RENO, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HAWKINS, THOMAS, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Justin Anderson (“Anderson”) appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We affirm.

The district court did not commit reversible error in its response to the second question posed by the jury. A district court possesses wide discretion in how it responds to a jury question and a reference to the original instructions, while not always the best course of action, is within the bounds of this discretion. *Arizona v. Johnson,*351 F.3d 988, 993-98 (9th Cir. 2003). Here, the district court encouraged the jury to review all the instructions before it, which included an instruction correctly answering the second question.

Sufficient evidence existed to support the conviction. In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, the “test is whether the evidence and all reasonable inferences which may be drawn from it, when viewed in the light most favorable to the government, sustain the verdict.” *United States v. Terry,*911 F.2d 272, 278 (9th Cir.1990) (quoting *United States v. Soto,*779 F.2d 558, 560 (9th Cir.1986)). The jury heard evidence that Anderson picked up the firearm and held it in his hand. This evidence was sufficient to allow a rational jury to conclude that he consciously possessed the firearm, and a rational jury could have discredited Anderson’s defense that he possessed the firearm by mistake or accident. Therefore, under our very deferential standard of review, sufficient evidence existed to sustain the verdict.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §4725. Technical assistance; waiver of payments for costs; credits to appropriation or fund for payment of expenses

The Office may furnish technical advice and assistance, on request, to State and general local governments seeking to improve their systems of personnel administration. The Office may waive, in whole or in part, payments from such governments for the costs of furnishing such assistance. All such payments shall be credited to the appropriation or fund from which the expenses were or are to be paid.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title II, §205, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1914; 1978 Reorg. Plan. No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Office", meaning Office of Personnel Management, substituted in text for "Commission", meaning Civil Service Commission, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in Civil Service Commission and Chairman thereof to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2482 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bicycle parts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN BICYCLE PARTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.87.17 Crank gear and parts (other 

than cotterless crank sets 

and parts thereof) (provided 

for in subheading 

8714.96.90) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•HR 2482 IH 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ACTIVIDENTITY CORP.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

INTERCEDE GROUP PLC, et al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C08-4577 VRW (BZ)

THIRD DISCOVERY ORDER

After reviewing the papers in this case, IT IS ORDERED as

follows:

1. Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order Barring the

Disclosure of Intercede Confidential Information to Mr.

Michael Neumann (Doc. No. 97) is GRANTED as unopposed.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 101) is GRANTED

for the following documents:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (Doc.

No. 97.)

2. Declaration of Richard Parris (Doc. No. 98)

3. Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Richard Parris

Case 3:08-cv-04577-VRW Document 122 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

4. Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Joseph Belichik

(Doc. No. 99).

3. Defendants’ Motion to Seal Exhibit 12 to the

Belichick Declaration is DENIED. See Contratto v. Ethicon,

Inc., 227 F.R.D. 304, 307 (N.D. Cal. 2005). 

4. Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions and Contempt (Doc.

No. 108) is DENIED without prejudice. If defendants wish,

they may re-file a properly noticed motion in compliance with

the Civil Local Rules.

5. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Doc. No. 110) is DENIED

as moot.

6. Plaintiff’s Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 109) Exhibit 1

to the Holloway Declaration is DENIED. Contratto, 227 F.R.D.

at 307.

Dated: February 1, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman 

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-REFS\ACTIVIDENTITY V. INTERCEDE\DISC ORD 3.FINAL RULING.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04577-VRW Document 122 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2578 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2578

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Dimethyl carbonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Dimethyl carbonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIMETHYL CARBONATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.07.44      Dimethyl carbonate  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 616-68-                                                   31/2009
                         6) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2920.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Michael Chika MEREMIKWU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60072

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 27, 2007.

Michael Chika Meremikwu, Grand Prairie, TX, pro se.

Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, pro se.

Donald Anthony Couvillon, Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Holly Michele Smith, Linda Susan Wendtland, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Anne M. Estrada, U.S. Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Trey Lund, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Chika Meremikwu, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions this court to review the final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Meremikwu failed to file his petition within *316the 30-day period mandated by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider it. *See Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft,*330 F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir.2003).

The petition for review is DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §292p. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

For fiscal year 1993 and subsequent fiscal years, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for the adequacy of the student loan insurance account under this subpart and for the purpose of administering this subpart.

#### (b) Availability of sums

Sums appropriated under subsection (a) shall remain available until expended.

(July 1, 1944, ch. 373, title VII, §720, as added Pub. L. 102–408, title I, §102, Oct. 13, 1992, 106 Stat. 2011.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 720 of act July 1, 1944, was classified to section 293 of this title prior to the general revision of this subchapter by Pub. L. 102–408.
§ 506.6 Publicizing vacancies. When applicants from outside the Federal service are desired, part-time vacancies may be publicized through various recruiting means, such as: ( a ) Federal Job Information Centers.
( b ) State Employment Offices.
( c ) Broadcasting Board of Governors Vacancy Announcements.
( d ) College and University Placement Offices.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

The Commission gives notice that it has requested that the parties to the below listed agreement provide additional information pursuant to section 6(d) of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. app. 1705(d). The Commission has determined that further information is necessary to evaluate the proposed agreement modification. This action prevents the agreement modification from becoming effective as originally scheduled. 

*Agreement No.:*                     011453-004.                 

*Title:*                     Southern Africa/Oceania Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     Safmarine Container Lines N.V.; Mediterranean Shipping Co., S.A.; and A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S.                 

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

Dated: December 17, 2004. 

Bryant L. VanBrakle, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-28042 Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICK L. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 15875

D.C. No. 3:16

- cv

- 00893

- MEJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Maria

- Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted April 11, 2017 ** *

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Patrick L. Richardson appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of coram nobis . We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

** * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 15875

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

. We re view de novo a district court’s

d ismissal for lack of jurisdiction

, United States v. Monreal , 301 F.3d 1127, 1130

(9th Cir. 2002) , and w e affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Richardson’s petition challenging his

California state conviction for murder because c oram nobis relief is not available

in federal court to attack a state court conviction. See id . at 1131 (“[W]rit of error

coram nobis

. . . may only be brought in the sentencing court.” ).

Richardson’s request that this court order the district court to cease

collecting payments from his prisoner trust account to satisfy the filing fee , set

forth in his request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 6), is denied. To the

extent that Richardson requests that this court take judicial notice of the district

court’ s orders in this proceeding (Docket Entry No. 6), that request is denied as

unnecessary.

AFFIRMED.
New Jersey Business & Industry Association 

Michele N. Siekerka 

President 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

The Honorable Penny Pritzker 

Secretary of Commerce 

US Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20230 

BIA 

Dear Secretary Kerry, Secretary Pritzker, and Secretary Foxx, 

May 15,2015 

I'm writing to you today to bring your attention to an important step we can take to level the playing 

field for American businesses and maintain the environment of fair market competition in aviation 

established by Open Skies policy that has been crucial for America's success. 

As President and CEO of the New Jersey Business and Industry Association that represents 20,000 New 

Jersey companies, I am acutely aware ofthe considerable benefits Open Skies policy has brought my 

state, in addition to the U.S. economy as a whole. The competitive atmosphere created by Open Skies 

improved service, lowered fares and increased air travel and commerce throughout the country. 

Over the past decade, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline have received at least $42 

billion in government subsidies, interest-free "loans," free land, and other unfair benefits in direct 

violation of U.S. Open Skies policy. I am reaching out to ask that the U.S. government open consultations 

with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to address the massive, market-distorting 

subsidies that those nations provide their state-owned airlines. 

The tens of billions of dollars in subsidies are distorting the free market framework established by Open 

Skies and they will ultimately have a negative economic impact here in the United States if we allow 

them to continue. The uneven playing field created by these massive subsidies is forcing U.S. carriers like 

Delta, United and American Airlines out of an increasing number of international routes which, if 

10 West Lafayette Street, Trenton, NJ 08608-2002 • 609-393-7707 • \Vww.njbia.org 
allowed to continue, will lead the disappearance of thousands of American jobs. In fact, according to a 

white paper released by the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies, each route that is lost to Qatar, Etihad or 

Emirates will result in an average net loss of 821 good U.S. jobs. These are jobs that we can ill afford to 

lose and they should not be lost as a result of unfair competition from foreign carriers. 

I am not seeking to end the Open Skies agreements with Qatar and the UAE, nor am I raising concerns 

with regard to any ofthe more than one hundred other Open Skies agreements. I am simply requesting 

that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the UAE, which are provided for within the 

Open Skies agreements themselves and hold off on the addition of new routes. 

Sincerely,
### §3536a. Report on interagency family economic empowerment strategies

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, shall submit a report to the Congress annually that describes—

(1) any interagency strategies of such Departments that are designed to improve family economic empowerment by linking housing assistance with essential supportive services, such as employment counseling and training, financial education and growth, childcare, transportation, meals, youth recreational activities, and other supportive services; and

(2) any actions taken in the preceding year to carry out such strategies and the extent of progress achieved by such actions.

(Pub. L. 114–201, title VI, §601, July 29, 2016, 130 Stat. 812.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act of 2016, and not as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act which comprises this chapter.
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Cliff Paterson

Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:23 AM

’Mott, Lisa (Barry)’

George Holliday; Neil Mosley

RE: SGA-V

H06717.pdf

Lisa,

I have attached the product data sheet ~or SGA-V. Chemically it is very similar in chemistry

to SGA-II both being cationic polymers in a hydrocarbon\water emulsion. SGA-V has improved

biodegradation properties compared to SGA-II and therefore the removal o~ the SUB label. For

technical specifications it would be best to contact our PE people.

Regards

Cli~ Paterson

Senior Environmental Specialist

Tel no. 01224 776884

Fax no. 01224 795194

e-mail cli~.paterson#halliburton.com

From: Mott, Lisa (Barry) [mailto:LMott@chevron.com]

Sent: 03 March 2009 16:43

To: Cli~ Paterson

Cc: Nell Mosley; George Holliday

Subject: SGA-V

George {orwarded your email onto me regarding SGA-V. I was wondering i{ you could give me

some more in{ormation on this chemical. What does this chemical consist o{, is it likely to

be compatible with highly permeable sands? Do you have any data on {riction {actor reduction

or any tests that have been per{ormed on it?

Regards,

HESI301718
Lisa Mott II

Completions Engineer

Chevron Upstream Europe

Chevron North Sea Limited

Chevron House

HiII o~ RubisIaw

Aberdeen AB15 6XL

CTN 677- 5708

Tel +44 1224 335708

Mob +44 7738075782

LMott <~ile:///\\1.m.barrvOchevron.com%20> @chevron.com Please access the attached hyperlink

~or corporate information on the sender o~ this e mail:

http://europeanupstream.chevron.com/CompaniesActRegistrationDetails.html

From: George Holliday [mailto:George.Holliday@Halliburton.com]

Sent: 03 March 2009 13:05

To: Mottj Lisa (Barry)

Cc: Nell Mosley

Subject: Halliburton chemical

Lisaj

The Tollowing is, verbatim, what our environmentalist advised me.

George~

SGA-II (Roman numeral) was registered up until May 2005 but was superseded by SGA-V. SGA-II

was a Gold band product but was a candidate ~or substitution due to poor biodegradation o~

one its’ components. SGA -V its’ replacement passes pre-screening and is a no label Gold band

product.

Regards

Cli~ Paterson

Senior Environmental Specialist

Tel no. 01224 776884

Fax no. 01224 795194

e-mail <mailto:cli~.paterson#halliburton.com> cli~.paterson#halliburton.com

HESI301719
I do not know ±T this means anyth±ng to you - but I do not understand it. Howeverj here ±s a

clue: It ±s used as a st±mulat±on chem±cal Tot ge11±ng ac±ds to stab±l±se them and ±t ±s

also used as a Tr±ct±on-reducer ±n co±l-tub±ng operat±ons. The T±rst attachment ±s an MSDS

sheet Tot the product. There ±s no second attachment - th±s was go±ng to be a Product Data

Sheet but I cannae T±nd one.

Regardsj

George

HESI301720
Copyrighted page/s removed. 

Please contact the EPA Docket Center, Public 

Reading Room to view this document. 

Address: 

1301 Constitution Ave, NW 

Room 3334 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: 

202-566-1744 

Fax: 

202-566- 9744 

Email: 

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TIFFINY ROUSEY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4094

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 21, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; James A. Yancey, 

Judge.

Tiffiny Rousey, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en 

banc); Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 

27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Toomer v. State, 895 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Teart v. 

State, 866 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Sherwood v. State, 745 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 1999).

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
#### §§ 711.104-711.109 [Reserved]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2434 

To extend the suspension of duty on Baytron C-R. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Baytron C-R. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYTRON C-R. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.38.15 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain aqueous catalytic preparations) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### §410a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, §17, as added June 24, 1937, ch. 382, Pt. I, §1, 50 Stat. 317; amended Oct. 30, 1951, ch. 632, §24, 65 Stat. 690, was transferred to section 228q of Title 45, Railroads, and subsequently superseded. See section 231q of Title 45.