alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          83,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     71,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               345,717
<PP&E>                                       1,948,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                 877,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,445,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,103,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                    (659,434)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,445,261
<SALES>                                        834,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               834,149
<CGS>                                          727,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  727,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (70,792)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (70,792)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (70,792)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








November 14,
      2008/s/H. Dean
      CubleyH. Dean Cubley

              Chief
      Executive Officer




30
### §2000g–2. Cooperation with other agencies; conciliation assistance in confidence and without publicity; information as confidential; restriction on performance of investigative or prosecuting functions; violations and penalties

(a) The Service shall, whenever possible, in performing its functions, seek and utilize the cooperation of appropriate State or local, public, or private agencies.

(b) The activities of all officers and employees of the Service in providing conciliation assistance shall be conducted in confidence and without publicity, and the Service shall hold confidential any information acquired in the regular performance of its duties upon the understanding that it would be so held. No officer or employee of the Service shall engage in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions of any department or agency in any litigation arising out of a dispute in which he acted on behalf of the Service. Any officer or other employee of the Service, who shall make public in any manner whatever any information in violation of this subsection, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year.

(Pub. L. 88–352, title X, §1003, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 267.)
Case 3:09-cr-00559-WHA Document 41 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 2
February 1, 2010.

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge William Alsup

Case 3:09-cr-00559-WHA Document 41 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 2
§ 521.9 Answer. ( a ) The defendant may request a hearing by filing an answer with the reviewing official within 30 days of service of the complaint. An answer shall be deemed to be a request for a hearing.
( b ) In the answer, the defendant: ( 1 ) Shall admit or deny each of the allegations of liability made in the complaint;
( 2 ) Shall state any defense on which the defendant intends to rely;
( 3 ) May state any reasons why the defendant contends that the penalties and assessments should be less than the statutory maximum; and
( 4 ) Shall state the name, address, and telephone number of the person authorized by the defendant to act as defendant's representative, if any.
( c ) If the defendant is unable to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section within the time provided, the defendant may, before the expiration of 30 days from service of the complaint, file with the reviewing official a general answer denying liability and requesting a hearing, and a request for an extension of time within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The reviewing official shall file promptly with the ALJ the complaint, the general answer denying liability, and the request for an extension of time as provided in § 521.11. For good cause shown, the ALJ may grant the defendant up to 30 additional days within which to file an answer meeting the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
#### § 50.2 Determination of U.S. nationality of persons abroad.

The Department shall determine claims to United States nationality when made by persons abroad on the basis of an application for registration, for a passport, or for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America. Such determinations of nationality may be made abroad by a consular officer or a designated nationality examiner. A designated nationality examiner may accept and approve/disapprove applications for registration and accept and approve/disapprove applications for passports and issue passports. Under the supervision of a consular officer, designated nationality examiners shall accept, adjudicate, disapprove and provisionally approve applications for the Consular Report of Birth Abroad. A Consular Report of Birth Abroad may only be issued by a consular officer, who will review a designated nationality examiner's provisional approval of an application for such report and issue the report if satisfied that the claim to nationality has been established.

[31 FR 13537, Oct. 20, 1966, as amended at 61 FR 43311, Aug. 22, 1996]
Case 3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document 90 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 4 Case3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document89 Filed12/29/09 Page1 of 5
Case 3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document 90 Filed 01/04/10 Page 2 of 4 Case3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document89 Filed12/29/09 Page2 of 5
Case 3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document 90 Filed 01/04/10 Page 3 of 4 Case3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document89 Filed12/29/09 Page3 of 5
Case3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document89 Filed12/29/09 Page4 of 5

January 4, 2010

Case 3:08-cv-01962-JSW Document 90 Filed 01/04/10 Page 4 of 4
1

 A description of the provisions of the Chairman’s Mark of the Marriage Tax Relief Act

of 2000 may be found in Joint Committee on Taxation, Description of a Chairman’s Mark of the

Marriage Tax Relief Act of 2000 (JCX-34-00), March 28, 2000.

2

 This document may be cited as follows: Joint Committee on Taxation, Description of

Modification to the Chairman’s Mark (JCX-39-00), March 30, 2000.

Joint Committee on Taxation

March 30, 2000

JCX-39-00

DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION TO THE CHAIRMAN’S MARK

The Senate Committee on Finance has scheduled a markup of a Chairman’s Mark of the

“Marriage Tax Relief Act of 2000"1 on March 30, 2000. This document,2 prepared by the staff of

the Joint Committee on Taxation, contains a description of a modification to the Chairman’s

Mark.

A. Increase in the EIC Phase-out for Married Couples

The modification would increase the beginning and ending income levels of the phase-out

of the EIC for married couples filing a joint return by $2,500, instead of the $2,000 increase in

the Chairman’s mark. The beginning and ending income levels of the EIC phase-out (including

the $2,500 increase for joint returns) would continue to be indexed for inflation, as under present

law. For couples with two or more qualifying children, the maximum increase in the EIC as a

result of the modification would be $2,500 times 21.06 percent, or $526.50.

The modification relating to the EIC phase-out would be effective for taxable years

beginning after December 31, 2000.

B. Increase in Rate Brackets for Married Couples

The modification would adjust the phase in of the 15-percent regular income tax rate

bracket in the Chairman’s Mark, and would add a new provision to increase the size of the 28-

percent regular income tax rate bracket for married couples filing a joint return to twice the size

of the corresponding rate bracket for a single individual. The increase in the 15-percent and 28-

percent rate brackets would be phased-in over six years as follows:
Taxable year

Joint return rate bracket 

as a percentage of 

single return rate bracket

2002 ................... 170.3

2003 ................... 173.8

2004 ................... 180.0

2005 ................... 183.2

2006 ................... 185.0

2007 and thereafter . . . . . . . . 200

The modification to the 15-percent and 28-percent rate brackets would be effective for

taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001.

- 2 -
#### John R. JENSEN, Petitioner, v. The ADMINISTRATOR OF the FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION and The National Transportation Safety Board, Respondents.

No. 78-2135.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 28, 1982.

Thomas H. Lambert and B. Frank Ken-nerly, San Diego, Cal., for petitioner.

Douglas N. Letter, Washington, D. C., argued, for respondents; William Kanter, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief.

Before TRASK and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing is hereby denied as moot. The opinion of this court, *Jensen v. Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration,*641 F.2d 797 (1981) is hereby vacated. *Great Western Sugar Co. v. Nelson,*442 U.S. 92, 99 S.Ct. 2149, 60 L.Ed.2d 735 (1979); *see United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950). Petitioner, appealing from adverse agency action, requested that this court invalidate the FAA regulations that had caused his disqualification. The FAA has substantially revised the regulations of which he complained. The revised regulations are now effective. Petitioner can apply to the FAA for an airman *594medical certificate under the new regulations that are not before this court.
```

[House Report 110-348]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    110-348

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 52) 
  MAKING CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2008, AND FOR 
                             OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

 September 25, 2007.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Mrs. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 677]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 677, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 52, 
making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and 
for other purposes, under a closed rule. The resolution 
provides one hour of general debate in the House equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations.
    The resolution waives all points of order against the joint 
resolution and against its consideration (except for clause 9 
or 10 of rule XXI). The resolution also provides that the joint 
resolution shall be considered as read. The rule provides one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions. The rule 
provides that the Chair may postpone further consideration of 
the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker and 
tables House Resolution 659.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against the joint 
resolution and against its consideration includes a waiver of 
section 302 of the Budget Act (prohibiting the consideration of 
legislation providing new budget authority for any fiscal year 
that would cause the applicable allocation of new budget 
authority made pursuant to section 302(a) or (b) to be 
exceeded).

                                  

```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAURA FUJISAWA, et al.

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COMPASS VISION, INC., et

al.,

Defendant(s).

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. C07-5642 BZ

Related Cases: C07-3431 BZ

 C08-4118 BZ

 C09-2016 BZ

 Following a telephone conference where all parties were

represented by counsel, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant Maximus shall file its motion to sever by

MARCH 24, 2010. Any opposition shall be filed by APRIL 7,

2010. Any reply shall be filed by APRIL 14, 2010.

2. The motion to sever is scheduled to be heard on MAY

5, 2010 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal

Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California

94102. 

3. Any motion for summary judgment shall be filed by MAY

12, 2010. The parties shall cooperate in filing a joint

Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ Document 70 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

statement of undisputed facts. Any opposition shall be filed

by JUNE 2, 2010. Any reply shall be filed by JUNE 9, 2010. 

The motions for summary judgment are scheduled to be heard on

JUNE 30, 2010 at 10:00 a.m.. 

4. This case is scheduled for trial beginning NOVEMBER

29, 2010. The pretrial conference is scheduled for NOVEMBER

9, 2010 at 4:00 p.m.. The trial date scheduled for JULY 19,

2010 is VACATED. The disclosure and discovery deadlines in

the Order dated February 2, 2010 shall remain in effect. 

Dated: February 9, 2010 

 Bernard Zimmerman

 United States Magistrate Judge

G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FUJISAWA V. COMPASS VISION\BRIEFING ORDER.wpd

Case 3:08-cv-04118-BZ Document 70 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2760

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the preparation 

of audit reports based upon the financial auditing of Medicare Advantage 

organizations and to make such reports available to the public. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 7, 2005

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 

the preparation of audit reports based upon the financial 

auditing of Medicare Advantage organizations and to 

make such reports available to the public.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Advantage 

5 Audit Reports Act’’. 
2

•HR 2760 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PREPARATION AND AVAILABILITY OF AUDIT RE2 PORTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1857(d)(1) of the Social 

4 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–27(d)(1)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(B) AUDIT REPORTS.—Upon completion 

11 of each audit under subparagraph (A), the Sec12 retary shall prepare and make available an 

13 audit report stating the analysis and conclu14 sions of the Secretary regarding such audit. 

15 Each audit report shall include a detailed sum16 mary of the financial information upon which 

17 the analysis and conclusions of the Secretary 

18 are based, including the data referred to in sub19 paragraph (A). Section 552(b)(4) of title 5, 

20 United States Code, shall not apply to any 

21 audit report prepared under this subpara22 graph.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 this section shall apply to any audit completed after the 

25 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Texas Petrochemicals LP (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter period ending September 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


November14, 2002                                 /s/ Carl S. Stutts
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Carl S. Stutts
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
### §5103. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–235, title I, §103, Oct. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 3066

Section, Pub. L. 93–247, title I, §103, formerly §4, Jan. 31, 1974, 88 Stat. 5; Pub. L. 93–644, §8(d)(2), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2310; Pub. L. 95–266, title I, §103, Apr. 24, 1978, 92 Stat. 206; Pub. L. 98–457, title I, §§103, 122, 123, Oct. 9, 1984, 98 Stat. 1750, 1752, 1753; Pub. L. 99–401, title I, §102(a), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 903; Pub. L. 100–117, §1, Sept. 28, 1987, 101 Stat. 751; Pub. L. 100–294, title I, §101, Apr. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 105; renumbered title I, §103, Pub. L. 101–126, §3(a)(1), (2), Oct. 25, 1989, 103 Stat. 764, related to the Inter-Agency Task Force on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2019-GC43 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc.; National Tax Search, LLC; Situs Holdings, LLC;   Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; LNR Partners, LLC; and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC.

Date:March 27, 2020

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

CGCMT 2019-GC43 Certifications