alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to Offer Letter



  
 Exhibit 10.10

 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO 
 TO OFFER LETTER 
 This Amendment Number Two is effective as of
August 16, 2010, by and between Rewards Network Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and Roya Behnia (“Executive”), and hereby amends the Offer Letter dated August 3, 2006 by and between the Corporation and
Executive, which was previously amended effective January 1, 2009 (the “Offer Letter”). 
 I. 

The Offer Letter is hereby amended to provide that for all purposes under the Offer Letter, a “Change in
Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if a “Change in Control” occurs for purposes of the Corporation’s 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as the same may be amended from time to time. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment Number Two as of the date first written above. 

 

			
	REWARDS NETWORK INC.
		
	By:	 	       /s/ Ronald L. Blake

	Name:  Ronald L. Blake
	Title:  President and CEO
	
	               /s/ Roya
Behnia

	Roya Behnia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE MERGER WITH M-R
GROUP PLC ACCOUNTED FOR UNDER THE PURCHASE METHOD OF ACCOUNTING.  THE FINANCIAL
DATA SCHEDULES PREVIOUSLY FILED WITH THE FORM 10-Q ON AUGUST 16, 1999 ACCOUNTED
FOR SUCH MERGER UNDER THE POOLING OF INTERESTS METHOD OF ACCOUNTING.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           8,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     13,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,900
<PP&E>                                         109,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 768,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,190
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   768,077
<SALES>                                        225,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,555
<CGS>                                          144,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,845
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,942
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,808
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
### §5207. Firearms policies

#### (a) Prohibition on confiscation of firearms

No officer or employee of the United States (including any member of the uniformed services), or person operating pursuant to or under color of Federal law, or receiving Federal funds, or under control of any Federal official, or providing services to such an officer, employee, or other person, while acting in support of relief from a major disaster or emergency, may—

(1) temporarily or permanently seize, or authorize seizure of, any firearm the possession of which is not prohibited under Federal, State, or local law, other than for forfeiture in compliance with Federal law or as evidence in a criminal investigation;

(2) require registration of any firearm for which registration is not required by Federal, State, or local law;

(3) prohibit possession of any firearm, or promulgate any rule, regulation, or order prohibiting possession of any firearm, in any place or by any person where such possession is not otherwise prohibited by Federal, State, or local law; or

(4) prohibit the carrying of firearms by any person otherwise authorized to carry firearms under Federal, State, or local law, solely because such person is operating under the direction, control, or supervision of a Federal agency in support of relief from the major disaster or emergency.

#### (b) Limitation

Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit any person in subsection (a) from requiring the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entry into any mode of transportation used for rescue or evacuation during a major disaster or emergency, provided that such temporarily surrendered firearm is returned at the completion of such rescue or evacuation.

#### (c) Private rights of action

#### (1) In general

Any individual aggrieved by a violation of this section may seek relief in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress against any person who subjects such individual, or causes such individual to be subjected, to the deprivation of any of the rights, privileges, or immunities secured by this section.

#### (2) Remedies

In addition to any existing remedy in law or equity, under any law, an individual aggrieved by the seizure or confiscation of a firearm in violation of this section may bring an action for return of such firearm in the United States district court in the district in which that individual resides or in which such firearm may be found.

#### (3) Attorney fees

In any action or proceeding to enforce this section, the court shall award the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs.

(Pub. L. 93–288, title VII, §706, as added Pub. L. 109–295, title V, §557, Oct. 4, 2006, 120 Stat. 1391.)
§ 521.24 Protective order. ( a ) A party or a prospective witness or deponent may file a motion for a protective order with respect to discovery sought by an opposing party or, with respect to the hearing, seeking to limit the availability or disclosure of evidence.
( b ) In issuing a protective order, the ALJ may make any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: ( 1 ) That the discovery not be had;
( 2 ) That the discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place;
( 3 ) That the discovery may be had only through a method of discovery other than that requested;
( 4 ) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of discovery be limited to certain matters;
( 5 ) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the ALJ;
( 6 ) That the contents of discovery or evidence be sealed;
( 7 ) That a deposition after being sealed be opened only by order of the ALJ;
( 8 ) That a trade secret or other confidential research, development, commercial information, or facts pertaining to any criminal investigation, proceeding or other administrative investigation not be disclosed or be disclosed only in a designated way; or
( 9 ) That the parties simultaneously file specified documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be opened as directed by the ALJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,902
<SECURITIES>                                    20,330
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,232
<PP&E>                                             350
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,306
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,487)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
§ 96.88 Review of suspension, cancellation, or debarment by the Secretary. ( a ) Except to the extent provided by the procedures in § 96.84, an adverse action by the Secretary shall not be subject to administrative review.
( b ) Section 204(d) of the IAA (42 U.S.C. 14924(d)) provides for judicial review of final actions by the Secretary. When any petition brought under section 204(d) raises as an issue whether the deficiencies necessitating a suspension or cancellation of accreditation or approval have been corrected, procedures maintained by the Secretary pursuant to § 96.84(a) must first be exhausted. A suspension or cancellation of accreditation or approval, and a debarment (whether temporary or permanent) by the Secretary are final actions subject to judicial review. Other actions by the Secretary are not final actions and are not subject to judicial review.
( c ) In accordance with section 204(d) of the IAA (42 U.S.C. 14924(d)), an agency or person that has been suspended, cancelled, or temporarily or permanently debarred by the Secretary may petition the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, or the United States district court in the judicial district in which the person resides or the agency is located, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 706, to set aside the action.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James V. Marino, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the County Court, Nassau County, both imposed June 24, 1977, upon his convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third and fifth degrees, upon his pleas of guilty, the sentences being concurrent terms of imprisonment of two years to life and up to three years, respectively. Sentence imposed upon the conviction of a criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree affirmed. No opinion. Sentence imposed upon the conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the minimum period of incarceration to one year. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence imposed upon the conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Cohalan, J. P., Margett, Hawkins and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Hines, Appellant.

[716 NYS2d 613]

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), rendered April 7, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts).

Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of criminal sale of a *505controlled substance in the second degree and three counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of four years to life. He now appeals challenging the sufficiency of his plea allocution and, alternatively, asserting that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive.

Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of his plea allocution is not preserved for our review inasmuch as defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea under CPL 220.60 (3) or to vacate the judgment of conviction under CPL 440.10 *(see, People v Johnson,*82 NY2d 683, 685; *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665). Moreover, the narrow exception to the preservation doctrine *(see, People v Lopez, supra,*at 666) is not applicable here inasmuch as the record fails to disclose any circumstances that would have warranted further inquiry by County Court prior to accepting defendant’s plea *(see, People v Saitch,*260 AD2d 724, 725, *lv denied*93 NY2d 1006; *People v Vonderchek,*245 AD2d 979, 980, *lv denied*91 NY2d 945). In any event, we find that defendant’s plea was entered into voluntarily and that his allocution established all of the necessary elements of the crimes to which he pleaded.

Likewise, we conclude that the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive. Where a sentence is within permissible statutory ranges, it will not be disturbed unless the sentencing court abused its discretion or extraordinary circumstances exist warranting modification *(see, People v Brown,*239 AD2d 784, 785, *lv denied*91 NY2d 870; *People v Parson,*209 AD2d 882, 884, *lv denied*84 NY2d 1014). In light of defendant’s prior criminal history and the serious nature of the crimes, we find no reason to modify the sentence imposed *(see, People v Brown, supra,*at 785; *People v Vasquez,*231 AD2d 755, *lv denied*89 NY2d 931).

Mercure, J. P., Carpinello, Graffeo and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 76478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27871]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Association of Blood Banks

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 15, 2004, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Association of 
Blood Banks (``AABB'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the standards development organization is: American 
Association of Blood Banks, Bethesda, MD. The nature and scope of 
AABB's standards development activities are: The development of 
standards for voluntary compliance, and accreditation against those 
standards, in the areas of whole blood and blood component collection, 
processing and transfusion; the collection, processing and 
transplantation of marrow, peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood 
progenitor cells; tissue transplantation, and parentage testing.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 04-27871 Filed 12-20-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Materials Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) will meet on January 27, 2005, 10:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 3884, 14th Street between Constitution & Pennsylvania Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to advanced materials and related technology.

*Agenda:*

1. Opening remarks.

2. Presentation of papers and comments by the public.

3. Review of Chemical Weapons Convention Schedules.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Lee Ann Carpenter at                     *Lcarpent@bis.doc.gov.*

For more information contact Lee Ann Carpenter on (202) 482-2583.

Dated: December 20, 2004.

Lee Ann Carpenter,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-28103  Filed 12-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
§ 1006.315 May I use the services of an excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction? ( a ) You as a participant may continue to use the services of an excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction if you were using the services of that person in the transaction before the person was excluded. However, you are not required to continue using that person's services as a principal. You should make a decision about whether to discontinue that person's services only after a thorough review to ensure that the action is proper and appropriate.
( b ) You may not begin to use the services of an excluded person as a principal under a covered transaction unless the Inter-American Foundation grants an exception under § 1006.120.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2680 

To amend the Social Security Act to permit a waiver by the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services of the 24-month waiting period for 

Medicare coverage of disabled individuals who are terminally ill. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005 

Mr. HULSHOF (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. FOLEY, and Mr. SHAW) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Social Security Act to permit a waiver by 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services of the 

24-month waiting period for Medicare coverage of disabled individuals who are terminally ill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare for the Ter5 minally Ill Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•HR 2680 IH 

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF 24-MONTH WAITING PERIOD FOR MEDI2 CARE COVERAGE OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS 

3 WHO ARE TERMINALLY ILL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 226(h) of the Social Secu5 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 426(h)) is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘in the case’’; and 

7 (2) by inserting after ‘‘(ALS)’’ the following: 

8 ‘‘and (B) in the case of an individual whom a physi9 cian has certified in writing as being terminally ill 

10 (within the meaning of section 1861(dd)(3)(A)) and 

11 for whom the Secretary has made a determination 

12 that the requirements of subsection (b) (relating to 

13 24 months of entitlement to benefits or other status) 

14 would otherwise work an undue hardship on such in15 dividual, as determined on the basis of criteria es16 tablished by the Secretary’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this Act shall apply to benefits for months beginning after 

19 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Marion F. Mahon, as Sole Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. Waddell & Mahon Corporation, Defendant, Impleaded with Bergoff Bros. & Waddell, Inc., and Others, Appellants.

Order modified by providing that the words “ the accounts receivable, stock book, minute book, canceled cheeks, letters and all other communications and papers pertaining to any and all firms, corporations and individuals employing the defendant Waddell & Mahon Corporation and,” and the words “ as well as all references of the defendant Bergoff Bros. & Waddell, Inc.,” be stricken out of the original order for examination, and as so modified the order appealed from is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present—Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Case 3:08-cv-03690-MHP Document 67 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 3
18

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cv-03690-MHP Document 67 Filed 06/21/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-03690-MHP Document 67 Filed 06/21/10 Page 3 of 3
### §4918. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter (other than for research and development) $15,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1979.

(Pub. L. 92–574, §19, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1250; Pub. L. 94–301, §2, May 31, 1976, 90 Stat. 590; Pub. L. 95–609, §6, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3081.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–609 substituted provisions authorizing appropriations of $15,000,000 for 1979 for provisions authorizing appropriations for fiscal years 1973 to 1977 and struck out restriction on expenditures for research and development.

1976—Pub. L. 94–301 inserted authorization of appropriations for fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, the transition period, and fiscal year ending September 30, 1977, and provisions excepting appropriations for research and development use.
- Skip to global NPS navigation
    - Skip to the main content
    - Skip to the footer section

National Park Service**Search

# **OpenMenu**CloseMenu

## Explore This Park

## Explore the National Park Service

## Exiting nps.gov

National Historic Landmarks Program