alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DESCRIPTION OF AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF

A SUBSTITUTE TO THE PROVISIONS OF H.R. 5523, THE

“CLYDE-HIRSCH-SOWERS RESPECT ACT”

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute modifies H.R. 5523. The 

Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute replaces “paid” with “received” on pages 4

and 5 at line 19 and line 1, respectively, and in the new entry for the Code table of sections

following line 13 of H.R. 5523.

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute also replaces “I.R.S.” with

“Internal Revenue Service” on page 4, line 20, and on page 5, line 2, and in the new entry for the 

Code table of sections following line 13 of H.R. 5523. 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute replaces“139F” with “139G” on 

page 4, line 10, and in the new entry for the Code table of sections following line 13 of H.R. 

5523. 

The Chairman’s amendment in the nature of a substitute revises section 3 of H.R. 5523 at 

page 4, at lines 14 through 19, to clarify that the interest that may be excludible from income is 

all interest “...received from the Federal Government in connection with an action to recover 

property seized by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to section 5317(c)(2) of title 31, United 

States Code, by reason of a claimed violation of section 5324 of such title.” 

The proposal is estimated to reduce Federal fiscal year budget receipts by less than 

$500,000 for the period 2017 through 2026.

JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION

July 6, 2016

JCX-64-16
```

[Federal Register: June 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 111)]
[Notices]               
[Page 32980-32981]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10jn10-81]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7042]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Olmec: Masterworks of Ancient Mexico''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.

[[Page 32981]]

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs 
Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 
U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 
1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as 
amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 
19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Olmec: Masterworks of Ancient Mexico,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Los Angeles 
County Museum of Art, Los Angeles, CA, from on or about September 26, 
2010, until on or about January 1, 2011; the Fine Arts Museums of San 
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, from on or about February 19, 2011, until 
on or about May 30, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 2, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-13968 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2444 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bayowet C4. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bayowet C4. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BAYOWET C4. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.05.70 1-Butanesulfonic Acid, 

1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4- 

Nonafluoro-Potassium Salt 

(CAS #29420–49–3) (provided for in subheading 

2904.90.50) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•HR 2444 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddie Cash, Appellant.

[821 NYS2d 520]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered January 3, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present— Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

TONY E. EMERY

,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE & FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION

,

Defendants. Civil Action No. 1 9

- 3525 (JMC)

ORDER

For the reas ons stated in the accompanying memorandum o pinion, it is hereby ORDERED

that Defendants’ M otion for S ummary J udgment, ECF 21, is G RANTED and the case is

DISMISSED

.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s M otion to A ssess C ourt C osts to respondents , ECF

20, is DENIED

.

The Clerk of Court shall terminate this case.

This is a final appealable o rder.

SO ORDERED

.

DATE: October 31 , 2022

Jia M. Cobb

U.S. District Court Judge
#### § 92.88 Consular procedure.

With regard to the serving of subpoenas and orders to show cause referred to in §§ 92.86 and 92.87, section 1 of the act of June 25, 1948 (sec. 1, 62 Stat. 819, 28 U.S.C. 1783), provides that the subpoena shall designate the time and place for appearance before the court of the United States, and shall issue to any consular officer of the United States in the foreign country. The consular officer is required to make personal service of the subpoena and any order to show cause, rule, judgment or decree on the request of the Federal court or its marshal, and to make return thereof to such court after tendering to the witness his necessary travel and attendance expenses, which will be determined by the court and sent with the subpoena. When the subpoena or order is forwarded to the officer, it is usually accompanied by instructions directing exactly how service should be made and how the return of service should be executed. These instructions should be followed carefully.
### §3722. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3722 was editorially reclassified as section 10122 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Report on Drug-testing Technologies

Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title II, §2201, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1793, required the National Institute of Justice to conduct a study of drug-testing technologies that may be used as alternatives or complements to urinalysis not later than Nov. 2, 2002.

#### Anti-Stalking Legislation Evaluation, Model Development, Dissemination and Report

Pub. L. 102–395, title I, §109(b), Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1842, directed Attorney General, acting through Director of National Institute of Justice, to evaluate existing and proposed anti-stalking legislation in the States, develop model anti-stalking legislation that is constitutional and enforceable, prepare and disseminate to State authorities the findings made as a result of such evaluation, and report to Congress the findings and the need or appropriateness of further action by the Federal Government by Sept. 30, 1993.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,998,503
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,626,359
<PP&E>                                         211,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,096,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,119,079
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,628
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,919,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,096,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,106,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,894,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,894,302)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,894,302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)
        

</TABLE>
VRW 

Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 38 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 38 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 38 Filed 05/04/10 Page 3 of 4
AUGUST 12, May 4, 2010 

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Vaughn R Walker

Case 3:08-cv-01840-VRW Document 38 Filed 05/04/10 Page 4 of 4
§ 107.25 Provisions in legal instruments. ( a ) The following documents shall contain provisions or statements requiring compliance with E.O. 11063 and this part: ( 1 ) Contracts, grants and agreements providing Departmental assistance for the provision of housing and related facilities,
( 2 ) Contracts, grants and agreements regarding the sale, rental or management of properties owned by the Secretary,
( 3 ) Corporate charters and regulatory agreements relating to multifamily and land development projects assisted by the Department,
( 4 ) Approvals of financial institutions and other lenders as approved FHA mortgagees,
( 5 ) Requests for subdivision reports under home mortgage procedures and for preapplication analysis of multifamily and land development projects, and
( 6 ) Contracts and agreements providing for Departmental insurance or guarantee of loans with respect to housing and related facilities.
( b ) The provision or statement required pursuant to this section shall indicate that the failure or refusal to comply with the requirements of E.O. 11063 or this part shall be a proper basis for the imposition of sanctions provided in § 107.60.
§ 67.3 Management. ( a ) NED's operations and staff are managed by a President selected by the Board of Directors. The President is the chief executive officer of the corporation and manages the business of the corporation under the policy direction of the Board of Directors. The President directs a staff whose functions are divided among the Office of the President, a Program Section and a Finance Office.
( b ) The Office of the President provides policy direction and is responsible for day-to-day management of the organization, including personnel management, liaison with the Board of Directors and preparation of meetings of the Board and Board committees. The President's office also provides information concerning NED's activities to the press and public. The Program Section, under the direction of the Director of Program, is responsible for the review and preparation of proposals submitted to the Endowment and for the monitoring and evaluation of all programs funded by NED.
( c ) The Finance Office, under the direction of the Comptroller, is responsible, with the President and the Board of Directors, for financial management of NED's affairs, including both administrative financial management and grant management. The Director of Program and the Comptroller report to the NED President.
Arelis Navarro

321 S. West Ave #D

Elmhurst, IL 60126

October 30, 2015

Exemption 333

Dear Federal Aviation Administration,

My name is Arelis and I’m currently enrolled at Lewis University for Unmanned Aircraft Systems. 

I have recently purchased a DJI Phantom UAS for employment purposes and would like to get an 

Exemption 333 to seek employment in the field. I have taken flight lessons and have a great experience 

with UAV’s. Current positions online are requiring an Exemption 333 to become employed. The DJI 

Phantom 3 would be utilized for Agriculture, Search and Rescue and Photography for Accident 

Investigation once employment occurs. I am currently a licensed Emergency Medical Technician-Basic

(have passed my physical for Medical Clearance 1) and understand the true meaning of safety. I plan on 

being safe with the Unmanned Aircraft, abiding by FAA rules, keeping the drone within Visual Line of 

Sight, kept within 400 feet altitude and away from airports.

A pre-flight inspection, repairs and maintenance would be conducted for safe flight. DJI 

Phantom uses 2.4 GHz range and video is 5.8 GHz under analog. The DJI Phantom 3 complies with part 

15 of FCC Rules and protects against harmful interference. If you have any questions or concerns, please 

feel free to reach me at (331) 425-2768 or via email arelisnavarro2@icloud.com

Thank You in Advance, 

Arelis Navarro
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer ofNew Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1,2019 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC andCNH Equipment Trust 2019-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.               NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.               The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate tothe Indenture Trustee.

 

3.               This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.               A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023 and of its performanceunder the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.               To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreementin all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2023.

 

6.               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th  day of March, 2024.

 

 

 

 

March 27, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-27222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2004-19327; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-56]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Scribner, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Scribner, NE.

EFFECTIVE DATES: 0901 UTC, January 20, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520A, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 26, 2004 
(69 FR 62401). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on January 20, 2005. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule 
will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on November 30, 2004.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Acting Area Director, Western Flight Services Operations.
[FR Doc. 04-27222 Filed 12-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OCULUS INNOVATIVE SCIENCES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

    v.

PRODINNV, S.A. de C.V. and CESARMANGOTICH PACHECO,

Defendants.                                                                      /

No. C-08-4707 MMC

ORDER CONTINUING CASEMANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF

Before the Court is plaintiff’s Supplemental Case Management Statement, filed

April 2, 2010, wherein plaintiff’s counsel reports that despite counsel’s best efforts, counsel

has been unable to obtain any response from either defendant following the Court’s order

striking the individual defendant’s filing of November 24, 2009.

As the record to date contains no answer or other response to the complaint, the

Case Management Conference scheduled for April 9, 2010 is hereby CONTINUED to

June 4, 2010, with a Statement due by May 28, 2010.  In the interim, plaintiff shall file, no

later than April 27, 2010, a request for entry of default as to each named defendant, or, in

the alternative, a statement setting forth the reason(s) why such default should not be

sought and entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: April 7, 2010

                                                   MAXINE M. CHESNEYUnited States District Judge

Case 3:08-cv-04707-MMC   Document 44   Filed 04/07/10   Page 1 of 1
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2652

To provide for the establishment of a memorial to the U.S.S. Oklahoma 

as part of the USS Arizona Memorial in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005

Mr. COLE of Oklahoma introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Resources 

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of a memorial to the U.S.S. 

Oklahoma as part of the USS Arizona Memorial in Pearl 

Harbor, Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S.S. Oklahoma Me5 morial Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF MEMORIAL TO U.S.S. OKLA7 HOMA. 

8 (a) IDENTIFICATION OF SITE FOR MEMORIAL.—The 

9 Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Sec10 retary of the Navy, shall identify an appropriate site on 
2

•HR 2652 IH 

1 Ford Island, Hawaii, for the location of a memorial to the 

2 U.S.S. Oklahoma, which was sunk during the attack on 

3 Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. 

4 (b) ESTABLISHMENT AND ADMINISTRATION.—After 

5 the site for the memorial is identified under subsection 

6 (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall establish and ad7 minister a memorial to the U.S.S. Oklahoma as part of 

8 the USS Arizona Memorial, a unit of the National Park 

9 System, in accordance with the laws and regulations appli10 cable to lands administered by the National Park Service. 

11 (c) MEMORIALIZATION PLAN.—Not later than one 

12 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec13 retary of the Interior shall submit to Congress a memori14 alization plan for the portion of Pearl Harbor where 

15 United States naval vessels were attacked on December 

16 7, 1941. The Secretary of the Interior shall prepare the 

17 plan in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy.

Æ
#### § 191.6 Effective date.

This regulation is effective as of November 4, 1979. Reimbursement may be made for expenses approved under this subchapter for services rendered on or after such date.
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

Plaintiff,

 v.

CHRISTIE’S INC., a New York corporation, 

and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. /

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

 /

CHRISTIE, MANSON & WOODS, LTD., 

a United Kingdom corporation,

Plaintiff,

 v.

HALSEY MINOR, an individual,

and ROES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. /

No. C 08-05445 WHA

Consolidated with:

No. C 09-00471 WHA

JUDGMENT

Based on the accompanying jury verdicts, judgment is hereby entered as follows: 

1. In Case No. 08-05445, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff

Halsey Minor and against defendant Christie’s Inc. in the total amount of

$8,570,000. 

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 133 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. In Case No. 08-05445, judgment is entered in favor of

counterclaimant Christie’s Inc. and against counterdefendant Halsey Minor in the

total amount of $417,000. 

3. In Case No. 09-00471, judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff

Christie, Manson & Woods and against defendant Halsey Minor in the total

amount of $994,716.06.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 21, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:08-cv-05445-WHA Document 133 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 2