alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3712b. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3712b was editorially reclassified as section 10104 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 92.42 Certification of copies of foreign records relating to land titles.

In certifying documents of the kind described in title 28, section 1742, of the United States Code, diplomatic and consular officers of the United States will conform to the Federal procedures for authenticating foreign public documents (§ 92.39), unless otherwise instructed in a specific case.
Order entered May 11 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 16 - 00023 - CV ETHEL LOCKHART AND/O R ALL OCCUPANTS OF 7 11 LENTISCO DRIVE

LANCASTER, TEXAS 751 46, Appellant s

V. SILVER BAY PROPERTY CORP. MANAGEMENT COM PANY FOR 2 012 - C

PROPERTY HOLDINGS LL C, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 15 - 05335 - B



### O RDER Bas e d on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY as moot appellee’s motion to dismiss

. /s/ LANA MYERS J USTICE
#### § 194.1 Authority and scope of application.

In accordance with the authority in chapter III of the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. 306), the Department of State has determined that the amended Rules of Procedures of the Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission (IACAC) should become effective in the United States and will come into force on April 1, 2002, at the same time as for all states party to the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration. The IACAC's amended Rules of Procedure set forth the procedures for the initiation and conduct of arbitration of certain international commercial disputes to which the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration applies. The amended Rules of Procedure are set out in full in appendix A to this part.
### §§17822 to 17824. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 17822, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1103, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4808, related to astronaut health care. See section 31302 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 17823, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1104, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4809, related to National Academies decadal surveys. See section 20305 of Title 51.

Section 17824, Pub. L. 110–422, title XI, §1107, Oct. 15, 2008, 122 Stat. 4810, related to NASA outreach program to promote business competitiveness through space and aeronautics technologies. See section 30305 of Title 51.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND 

ORDER LIFTING STAY FOR ENTRY OF SAME

(CASE NO. 08-CV-3632 CRB)) 

GEORGE LAMBERT, ESQ. 

LAW OFFICES 

1025 Connecticut Ave., Suite 1000 

Washington D.C. 20036 

Telephone: (202) 640-1897, fax (202) 747 7797 

Pro Hac Vice 

E-mail: lawdc10@aol.com 

Attorneys for Judgment Creditor and Plaintiff 

Universal Trading & Investment Co. Inc. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 

UNIVERSAL TRADING & 

INVESTMENT CO., INC. 

Judgment Creditor, 

 v. 

DUGSBERY, INC.; PAVLO 

LAZARENKO; LADY LAKE 

INVESTMENT CORP.; FAIRMONT 

GROUP LTD.; ORBY 

INTERNATIONAL, LTD.; UNITED 

ENERGY SYSTEMS OF UKRAINE; 

PFG; SAMANTE LTD.; CREDIT SUISSE 

GROUP; PAUL GULLY-HART; 

AURELIO FERRARI; TRUSTEES FOR 

PAVLO J. LAZARENKO; and DOES 

from 1 to 100, 

Defendants. 

Case No. 08-CV-3632-CRB 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AND ORDER LIFTING 

STAY FOR ENTRY OF SAME 

Plaintiff Universal Trading & Investment Co., Inc., through its undersigned attorneys, 

1. Requests that the Court lift the stay that is currently in effect for the sole purpose 

of entry of this Notice of Dismissal; and 

Case 3:08-cv-03632-CRB Document 89 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 -2- 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND 

ORDER LIFTING STAY FOR ENTRY OF SAME

(CASE NO. 08-CV-3632 CRB)) 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), hereby dismisses its action as to 

Defendant Aurelio Ferrari only, with prejudice and without costs. 

Dated: January 19, 2010 

_______________/s/___________________ George Lambert, Esq. 

Attorneys for Judgment Creditor and Plaintiff 

Universal Trading & Investment Co 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January _____, 2010 

United States District Judge 

 

133007\0004001\902005321.1 

22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Charles R. Breyer

Case 3:08-cv-03632-CRB Document 89 Filed 01/27/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 267

To require amounts remaining in Members’ representational allowances at 

the end of a fiscal year to be used for deficit reduction or to reduce 

the Federal debt, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2005

Mr. CAMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL

To require amounts remaining in Members’ representational 

allowances at the end of a fiscal year to be used for 

deficit reduction or to reduce the Federal debt, and for 

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REQUIRING AMOUNTS REMAINING IN MEM4 BERS’ REPRESENTATIONAL ALLOWANCES TO 

5 BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION OR TO RE6 DUCE THE FEDERAL DEBT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, any amounts appropriated for the Members’ 
2

•HR 267 IH 

1 Representational Allowance of a Member of the House of 

2 Representatives for a fiscal year which remain after all 

3 payments are made under such Allowance for the year 

4 shall be deposited in the Treasury and used for deficit re5 duction, except that in the case of a fiscal year for which 

6 there is no Federal budget deficit, such amounts shall be 

7 used to reduce the Federal debt (in such manner as the 

8 Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply with 

10 respect to fiscal year 2006 and each succeeding fiscal year. 

11 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION REQUIREMENT. 

12 After each session of Congress or other period for 

13 which the Members’ Representational Allowance is made 

14 available, there shall be published in the Congressional 

15 Record a statement showing, with respect to such session 

16 or period, the amount deposited with respect to each Mem17 ber under section 1 and the total deposited with respect 

18 to all Members. 

19 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

20 The Committee on House Administration of the 

21 House of Representatives shall have authority to prescribe 

22 regulations to carry out this Act. 
3

•HR 267 IH 

1 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

2 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘Member of the House 

3 of Representatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele4 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Advanced Optics  Electronics,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the three  months  ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, John Cousins,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                     /S/ JOHN COUSINS
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     May 16, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
FLOUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST WORKSHOP June 20,1996 PROPOSED AGE ND A I. Welcome and Introduction II. Overview Discussion III. Review of Agenda Elements IV. Technical Review of Draft Report • Engineering Analysis • Life-cycle Costs and Payback • Energy Savings 

### • Utility and Environmental Impacts • Recommended Actions to Complete Analysis V. Lunch on Your Own VI. Voluntary Programs Market Forces: • Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) • EPA's Green Lights and Energy Star • Demand-Side Management Programs • NEMA's Energy Efficiency Council • Existing Markets Building Codes - ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 • System efficiency (watts/sq. ft.) • Lighting controls Other Programs VII. Manufacturer Impacts VIII. Consumer Impacts Performance Incompatibilities • Dimming Ballasts • 34-watt Energy Saving Lamps • . Occupancy Sensors 

### • Interference with Electronic Equipment IX. Other Issues 

### X. Wrap-up
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2585 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2585

            To extend the suspension of duty on 2methyl-4,6-
                     bis[(octylthio)methyl]phenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the suspension of duty on 2methyl-4,6-
                     bis[(octylthio)methyl]phenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2METHYL-4,6-BIS[(OCTYLTHIO)METHYL]PHENOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.14 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2methyl-4,6-
bis[(octylthio)methyl]phenol) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CV 08-5198 EMC – 1 – US_ACTIVE-103884608.1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

John P. Zaimes (SBN 91933) 

jzaimes@reedsmith.com 

Roxanne M. Wilson (SBN 94627) 

rwilson@reedsmith.com

John H. Lien (SBN 222842) 

jlien@reedsmith.com

REED SMITH LLP

355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514 

Telephone: +1 213 457 8000 

Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Vector Marketing Corporation 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALICIA HARRIS, as an individual and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs,

vs. 

VECTOR MARKETING 

CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania 

corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, 

inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

No.: CV 08-5198 EMC 

JOINT STIPULATION AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE 

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE 

PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S 

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Assigned to the Hon. Edward M. Chen, 

Courtroom C 

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 189 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 3
REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CV 08-5198 EMC – 2 – US_ACTIVE-103884608.1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

Plaintiff Alicia Harris (“plaintiff” or “Harris”) and Defendant Vector Marketing 

Corporation (“defendant” or “Vector”) enter into this joint stipulation with reference 

to the following facts: 

RECITALS

A. On or about May 27, 2010, plaintiff filed and served her Third Amended 

Complaint (“TAC”). 

B. Vector’s time to respond to the TAC, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 6(d) and 15(a)(3), is currently set for June 14, 2010, but counsel for Vector 

is unavailable to file a responsive pleading on or before June 14, 2010. 

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated by the parties, through their 

respective counsel of record, as follows: 

1. Vector may have a one week extension, up to and including, June 21, 

2010, to file a responsive pleading to plaintiff’s TAC. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: June 8, 2010 REED SMITH LLP 

By /s/ 

Roxanne M. Wilson 

Attorneys for Defendant 

VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION 

Dated: June 8, 2010 Diversity Law Group 

By /s/ 

Larry W. Lee 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ALICIA HARRIS 

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 189 Filed 06/09/10 Page 2 of 3
REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CV 08-5198 EMC – 3 – US_ACTIVE-103884608.1

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: , 2010 

Honorable Edward M. Chen 

United States District Court Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:08-cv-05198-EMC Document 189 Filed 06/09/10 Page 3 of 3
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Final Site *** September 2010 

### VIENNA WELLS Vienna
, Missouri

Maries County

 **Site Location :** 

T he Vienna Well s site is located in Maries County, Vienna, Missouri. The site is located on a low ridge that lies between

the Gasconade and Maries River Valley.

 **Site History:**

The Vienna Wells site includes three contaminated public drinking water wells and the suspected source area, the former Langenberg Hat Factory facility. The Langenberg Hat Factory facility operated from 1952 unti l 1996. In 2007, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources ( MDNR) Public Drinking Water Branch ( PD WB) requested an investigation to determine the source of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Vienna Wells public drinking water supply. Based on the

inves tigation, MDNR determined the Langenberg Hat Factory facility was a suspected source of the PCE contamination.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:**

PCE has been detected in Well #1 and Well #3 over a 10- year period. Site Inspection sampling in 2007 and 2008 confirmed the presence of PCE in the public drinking water wells and in the distribution system, indicating there is actual exposure to PCE. The most recent sampling results for Well #3 indicate concentrations exceeding the Safe Drinking Water

Act Ma ximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for PCE in November 2008, February 2009, May 2009, and August 2009.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment :**  The City of Vienna public drinking water W ell #3 is the primary water source for approximately 628 residents, Well #1 is currently operating as an emergency standby and supp lemental water supply well

. The PDWB monitoring documents that levels of PCE have been increasing in Vienna Well #3 since 1997 and now exceed the MCL.

 **Response Activities (to d ate):**  The City of Vienna has secured funding for an air stripper project to remove contamination from the water supply.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**

The S tate of Missouri referred th e site to EPA. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated , but were not
viable at this time . E PA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the S tate

.

[The description of the site (release) is based on infor mation available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrativ e summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs ca n be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr. cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER ROLAND BRADLEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50113

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00389-DDP-3

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: NOONAN, WARDLAW and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Bradley appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute and

possess with intent to distribute oxycodone and oxymorphone. We affirm. 

The district court did not clearly err in attributing the entire amount of

oxycodone found at his coconspirators’ stash house to Bradley for purposes of

determining his offense level. See United States v. Palafox-Mazon, 198 F.3d 1182,

FILED

JUN 02 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 *This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1184, 1186 (9th Cir. 2000). Under the Sentencing Guidelines, Bradley “is

accountable for all quantities of contraband with which he was directly involved

and . . . all reasonably foreseeable quantities of contraband that were within the

scope of the criminal activity” that he “agreed to jointly undertake (i.e., the scope

of the specific conduct and objectives embraced by [his] agreement).” United

States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 1B1.3 cmt. n.2; see United

States v. Ortiz, 362 F.3d 1274, 1275-77 (9th Cir. 2004). A court “may consider

any explicit agreement or implicit agreement fairly inferred from the conduct of the

defendant and others” to determine “the scope of the specific conduct and

objectives embraced by the defendant’s agreement.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3 cmt. n.2.

Here, the district court applied the correct legal standard and made an

“individualized evaluation” of the amount of contraband that should be attributed

to Bradley under the Guidelines. United States v. Garcia-Sanchez, 189 F.3d 1143,

1147 (9th Cir. 1999). Based on the “totality of the circumstances and the course of

dealings over about a year or so between the parties,” including the

“overwhelmingly suspicious” mailings, the court found that the quantity of

relevant drugs recovered from the stash house was both in furtherance of, and

reasonably foreseeable in connection with, the criminal activity jointly undertaken

by Bradley. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3 cmt. n.2. The district court did not hold Bradley

2
accountable for several other quantities of contraband that were part of the

conspiracy, or a firearm that was found at his coconspirators’ residence. Taken as

a whole, these findings are not clearly erroneous.

AFFIRMED.

3
### §4726. Coordination of Federal programs

The Office, after consultation with other agencies concerned, shall—

(1) coordinate the personnel administration support and technical assistance given to State and local governments and the support given State programs or projects to strengthen local government personnel administration, including the furnishing of needed personnel administration services and technical assistance, under authority of this chapter with any such support given under other Federal programs; and

(2) make such arrangements, including the collection, maintenance, and dissemination of data on grants for strengthening State and local government personnel administration and on grants to States for furnishing needed personnel administration services and technical assistance to local governments, as needed to avoid duplication and insure consistent administration of related Federal activities.

(Pub. L. 91–648, title II, §206, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1914; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in par. (1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–648, Jan. 5, 1971, 84 Stat. 1909, known as the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Office", meaning Office of Personnel Management, substituted in text for "Commission", meaning Civil Service Commission, pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in Civil Service Commission and Chairman thereof to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.