alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: November 21, 2005            By: /s/ Barry Hodkin
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Barry Hodkin
                                           Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
Arelis Navarro

321 S. West Ave #D Elmhurst, IL 60126 October 30, 2015 Exemption 333 Dear Federal Aviation Administration, My name is Arelis and I’m currently enrolled at Lewis University for Unmanned Aircraft Systems. I have recently purchased a DJI Phantom UAS for employment purposes and would like to get an Exemption 333 to seek employment in the field. I have taken flight lessons and have a great experience with UAV’s. Current positions online are requiring an Exemption 333 to become employed . The DJI Phantom 3 would be u tilized for Agriculture, Search and Rescue and Photography for Accident Investigation once employment occurs . I am currently a licensed Emergency Medical Technician - Basic (have passed my physical for Medical Cl earance 1) and understand the true meaning of safety. I plan on being safe with the Unmanned Aircraft, a biding by FAA rules, keeping the drone within Visual Line of Sight, kept within 400 feet altitude and away from airports . A pre -flight inspection, repa irs and maintenance would be conducted for safe flight. DJI Phantom uses 2.4 GHz range and video is 5.8 GHz under analog. The DJI Phantom 3 complies with part 15 of FCC Rules and protects against harmful interference. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach me at (331) 425 - 2768 or via email arelisnavarro2@icloud.com Thank You in Advance, Arelis Navarro
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN CA 44332

United States Attorney

LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153

Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX 

Social Security Administration

BRENDA M. PULLIN, SBN CO 35181

Special Assistant United States Attorney

333 Market Street, Suite 1500

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 977-8985

Facsimile: (415) 744-0134

E-mail: Brenda.Pullin@ssa.gov

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

JO ANN E. HASELTINE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

 )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

CIVIL NO. 3:08-CV-5782-BZ 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

FILE A SUR-REPLY

Defendant hereby moves for leave to file a sur-reply to “Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendant’s

Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief” (Doc. No. 55) (hereinafter “Reply”), on the ground that

Plaintiff raised new arguments in said Reply. For example, among other new assertions, Plaintiff asserts

for the first time in her Reply that: a Notice in the Federal Register has any bearing on this matter; an

“analyst” is actually a Regional Chief Administrative Law Judge; and the discovery order at issue

concerns a bias complaint dated September 2008. See Pl.’s Reply at 2:20-3:25, 4:9-5:2. 

//

//

//

//

Case 3:08-cv-05782-BZ Document 58 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The proposed sur-reply is attached.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO

United States Attorney

Dated: February 8, 2010 By: /s/ Brenda M. Pullin BRENDA M. PULLIN

Special Assistant United States Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 8, 2010, I electronically transmitted the attached document to

the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing

to the following CM/ECF registrant:

Ian M. Sammis

1108 Tamalpais Ave. #1

San Rafael, CA 94901

/s/ Brenda M. Pullin 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORN

I

A

GRANTED

Judge Bernard Zimmerman

DATED: 2/9/2010

Case 3:08-cv-05782-BZ Document 58 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 2
#### CROKER, Appellant, v. STURGIS, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 16, 1903.)

Matter of Edward F. Croker against Thomas Sturgis, commissioner. J. J. Delany, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See 79 N. Y. Supp. 640.
§ 134.11 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for an award of fees and expenses under the Act shall identify the applicant and the proceeding for which an award is sought. The application shall show that the applicant has prevailed and identify the position of the Department of State in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was not substantially justified. Unless the applicant is an individual, the application shall also state the number of employees of the applicant and describe briefly the type and purpose of its organization or business.
( b ) The application shall also include a statement that the applicant's net worth does not exceed $1 million (if an individual) or $5 million (for all other applicants, including their affiliates). However, an applicant may omit this statement if: ( 1 ) It attaches a copy of a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service that it qualifies as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) or, in the case of a tax-exempt organization not required to obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service on its exempt status, a statement that describes the basis for the applicant's belief that it qualfies under such section; or
( 2 ) It states on the application that it is a cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)).
( c ) The application shall state the amount of fees and expenses for which an award is sought.
( d ) The application may also include any other matters that the applicant wishes the Department of State to consider in determining whether and in what amount an award should be made.
( e ) The application shall be signed by the applicant or an authorized officer or attorney of the applicant. It shall also contain or be accompanied by a written verification under oath or under penalty of prejury that the information provided in the application is true and correct.
### §6250e. Repealed. Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §301(a)(2), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 683

Section, Pub. L. 94–163, title I, §186, as added Pub. L. 106–469, title II, §201(a)(3), Nov. 9, 2000, 114 Stat. 2036; amended Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title III, §339(a)(2), Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 278, authorized appropriations for this part.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2


                               CFO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of ERF Wireless, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 21, 2005

By: /s/ R. Greg Smith
    --------------------------------------------
    R. Greg Smith
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
### §4525. Real property taxation

Nothing in this part shall be construed to exempt any real property that may be acquired and held by the Secretary as a result of the exercise of lien or subrogation rights from real property taxation to the same extent, according to its value, as other real property is taxed.

(Pub. L. 91–609, title VII, §724, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1801.)
§ 401.28 Advisory boards. ( a ) The Commission may appoint a board or boards, composed of qualified persons, to conduct on its behalf investigations and studies that may be necessary or desirable and to report to the Commission regarding any questions or matters involved in the subject matter of the reference.
( b ) Such board ordinarily will have an equal number of members from each country.
( c ) The Commission ordinarily will make copies of the main or final report of such board or a digest thereof available for examination by the Governments and interested persons prior to holding the final hearing or hearings referred to in § 401.29.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Wayne A. Eastman, Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
    ---------------------------
    Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
    Principal Executive Officer
    August 23, 2004
### §18118. Rules of construction

#### (a) No effect on antitrust laws

Nothing in this title 1 (or an amendment made by this title) 1 shall be construed to modify, impair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust laws. For the purposes of this section, the term "antitrust laws" has the meaning given such term in subsection (a) of section 12 of title 15, except that such term includes section 45 of title 15 to the extent that such section 45 applies to unfair methods of competition.

#### (b) Rule of construction regarding Hawaii's Prepaid Health Care Act

Nothing in this title 1 (or an amendment made by this title) 1 shall be construed to modify or limit the application of the exemption for Hawaii's Prepaid Health Care Act (Haw. Rev. Stat. §§393–1 et seq.) as provided for under section 1144(b)(5) of title 29.

#### (c) Student health insurance plans

Nothing in this title 1 (or an amendment made by this title) 1 shall be construed to prohibit an institution of higher education (as such term is defined for purposes of the Higher Education Act of 1965 [20 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.]) from offering a student health insurance plan, to the extent that such requirement is otherwise permitted under applicable Federal, State or local law.

#### (d) No effect on existing requirements

Nothing in this title 1 (or an amendment made by this title,1 unless specified by direct statutory reference) shall be construed to modify any existing Federal requirement concerning the State agency responsible for determining eligibility for programs identified in section 18083 of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–148, title I, §1560, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 261.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, where footnoted in text, is title I of Pub. L. 111–148, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 130, which enacted this chapter and enacted, amended, and transferred numerous other sections and notes in the Code. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.

The Higher Education Act of 1965, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 89–329, Nov. 8, 1965, 79 Stat. 1219, which is classified generally to chapter 28 (§1001 et seq.) of Title 20, Education. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1001 of Title 20 and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §5873. Director of Office of Management and Budget; power to make dispositions

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is authorized to make such additional incidental dispositions of personnel, personnel positions, assets, liabilities, contracts, property, records, and unexpended balances of appropriations, authorizations, allocations, and other funds held, used, arising from, available to or to be made available in connection with functions transferred by this chapter, as he may deem necessary or appropriate to accomplish the intent and purpose of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–438, title III, §303, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1250.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–438, Oct. 11, 1974, 88 Stat. 1233, known as the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5801 of this title and Tables.
#### Priester *v.*Bray.

April 11, 1912.

From Lowndes superior court. Motion to dismiss.

*O. S. Morgan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Denmark & Griffin,'*contra.

Atkinson, J.

Where in the certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the bill of exceptions, “as modified by the note attached and made a part thereof, is true,” and such note shows that the bill of exceptions is in large part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed. Jar*riel*v. *Jarriel,*115 *Ga.*23 (41 S. E. 262), and cases cited.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §3796ll–3. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 3796ll–3 was editorially reclassified as section 10534 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement.
#### § 213.34 Debts discharged in bankruptcy.

The CFO generally terminates collection activity on a debt discharged in bankruptcy, regardless of the amount. USAID may continue collection activity, however, subject to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code for any payments provided under a plan of reorganization. The CFO will seek legal advice by the Office of the USAID General Counsel if he or she believes that any claims or offsets might have survived the discharge of a debtor.

[86 FR 31145, June 11, 2021]
APPENDIX H: CORRESPONDENCE 

(Letter Received from US Dept of Interior – Fish & Wildlife Service) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Georgetown University Boathouse 

Environmental Assessment 

April 2006
#### § 50.4 Application for passport.

A claim to U.S. nationality in connection with an application for passport shall be determined by posts abroad in accordance with the regulations contained in part 51 of this chapter.
### §4904. Identification of major noise sources

#### (a) Development and publication of criteria

(1) The Administrator shall, after consultation with appropriate Federal agencies and within nine months of October 27, 1972, develop and publish criteria with respect to noise. Such criteria shall reflect the scientific knowledge most useful in indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on the public health or welfare which may be expected from differing quantities and qualities of noise.

(2) The Administrator shall, after consultation with appropriate Federal agencies and within twelve months of October 27, 1972, publish information on the levels of environmental noise the attainment and maintenance of which in defined areas under various conditions are requisite to protect the public health and welfare with an adequate margin of safety.

#### (b) Compilation and publication of reports on noise sources and control technology

The Administrator shall, after consultation with appropriate Federal agencies, compile and publish a report or series of reports (1) identifying products (or classes of products) which in his judgment are major sources of noise, and (2) giving information on techniques for control of noise from such products, including available data on the technology, costs, and alternative methods of noise control. The first such report shall be published not later than eighteen months after October 27, 1972.

#### (c) Supplemental criteria and reports

The Administrator shall from time to time review and, as appropriate, revise or supplement any criteria or reports published under this section.

#### (d) Publication in Federal Register

Any report (or revision thereof) under subsection (b)(1) identifying major noise sources shall be published in the Federal Register. The publication or revision under this section of any criteria or information on control techniques shall be announced in the Federal Register, and copies shall be made available to the general public.

(Pub. L. 92–574, §5, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1236.)
Case 3:08-cv-04853-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04853-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:08-cv-04853-EMC Document 43 Filed 05/04/10 Page 3 of 3
#### § 92.12 Necessity for certification of notarial acts.

A notarizing officer must execute a written certificate attesting to the performance of a notarial act. This certificate may be inserted on or appended to the notarized document (see § 92.17 regarding the fastening of sheets). The certificate evidences the performance of the notarial act. Failure to execute this certificate renders the notarial act legally ineffective. Each notarial act should be evidenced by a separate certificate; two or more distinct notarial acts should not be attested to by one certificate.

[22 FR 10858, Dec. 27, 1957, as amended at 60 FR 51721, Oct. 3, 1995]
#### UNITED STATES *of*America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ezell MCKELVER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-8029.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 2007.

Decided: May 2, 2007.

Ezell McKelver, Appellant Pro Se. Lee-sa Washington, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ezell McKelver appeals the district court’s margin order denying McKelver’s *186FecLR.Civ.P. 60(b) motion to reconsider his August 2003 criminal judgment. McKelver filed neither a direct appeal nor a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and he filed his Rule 60(b) motion more than three years after the district court entered judgment on his conviction and sentence.

Although “the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure do not specifically provide for motions for reconsideration and prescribe the time in which they must be filed,” *Nilson Van & Storage Co. v. Marsh,*755 F.2d 362, 364 (4th Cir.1985), a motion for rehearing or reconsideration in a criminal case extends the time for filing a notice of appeal if the motion is filed before the order sought to be reconsidered becomes final. *See United, States v. Ibarra,*502 U.S. 1, 4 n. 2, 112 S.Ct. 4, 116 L.Ed.2d 1 (1991) (holding would-be appellant who files timely motion for reconsideration from criminal judgment entitled to full time period for noticing appeal after motion for reconsideration has been decided); *United States v. Dieter,*429 U.S. 6, 7-8, 97 S.Ct. 18, 50 L.Ed.2d 8 (1976) (same); *see also United States v. Christy,*3 F.3d 765, 767 n. 1 (4th Cir.1993) (same).

McKelver submitted his Rule 60(b) motion well beyond the applicable period of time provided to notice an appeal of the judgment he sought the district court to reconsider. Accordingly, because McKel-ver’s Rule 60(b) motion was untimely, we affirm the district court’s order denying the motion. *See United States v. McKel-ver,*No. 5:03-cr-00262-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*