alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 713
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 713 appear at 84 FR 37752, Aug. 2, 2019.

§ 713.9 If my request is granted, what restrictions may apply? ( a ) *Records.* The Vice-President/General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the release of nonpublic records, including a requirement that you obtain a protective order or execute a confidentiality agreement with the other parties in the legal proceeding that limits access to and any further disclosure of the nonpublic records. The terms of a confidentiality agreement or protective order must be acceptable to the Vice-President/General Counsel. In cases where protective orders or confidentiality agreements have already been executed, DFC may condition the release of nonpublic records on an amendment to the existing protective order or confidentiality agreement.
( b ) *Testimony.* The Vice-President/General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the testimony of DFC employees, including, for example, limiting the areas of testimony or requiring you and the other parties to the legal proceeding to agree that the transcript of the testimony will be kept under seal or will only be used or made available in the particular legal proceeding for which you requested the testimony. The Vice-President/General Counsel may also require you to provide a copy of the transcript of the testimony to DFC at your expense.
Case 3:08-cv-03988-EMC Document 33 Filed 08/02/10 Page 1 of 4
7/30/2010

U

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Marilyn H. Patel

Case 3:08-cv-03988-EMC Document 33 Filed 08/02/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-03988-EMC Document 33 Filed 08/02/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:08-cv-03988-EMC Document 33 Filed 08/02/10 Page 4 of 4
### §4960. Applications for assistance

In reviewing an application for assistance under this part, the Director shall not deny such assistance to any project or program, or any public or private nonprofit organization, solely on the basis of the duration of the assistance such project, program, or organization has received under this part prior to the date of submission of the application. The Director shall grant assistance under this part on the basis of merit and to accomplish the goals of the VISTA program, and shall consider the needs and requirements of projects in existence on such date as well as potential new projects.

(Pub. L. 93–113, title I, §109, formerly §110, as added Pub. L. 101–204, title I, §103, Dec. 7, 1989, 103 Stat. 1812; amended Pub. L. 103–82, title III, §328, Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 902; renumbered §109, Pub. L. 111–13, title II, §2105, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1583.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 109 of Pub. L. 93–113 was classified to section 4959 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–13, title II, §2104, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1583, effective Oct. 1, 2009.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–82 amended section generally, substituting present provisions for provisions which related to: in subsec. (a), duration; in subsec. (b), consideration of application; in subsec. (c), new project or program; in subsec. (d), renewal of assistance; in subsec. (e), eligibility; and in subsec. (f), notice.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 392 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 4951 of this title.
§ 100.20 Definitions. The terms Department, Fair Housing Act, and Secretary are defined in 24 CFR part 5. *Aggrieved person* includes any person who— ( a ) Claims to have been injured by a discriminatory housing practice; or
( b ) Believes that such person will be injured by a discriminatory housing practice that is about to occur.
Broker or Agent includes any person authorized to perform an action on behalf of another person regarding any matter related to the sale or rental of dwellings, including offers, solicitations or contracts and the administration of matters regarding such offers, solicitations or contracts or any residential real estate-related transactions.
*Discriminatory housing practice* means an act that is unlawful under section 804, 805, 806, or 818 of the Fair Housing Act.
*Dwelling* means any building, structure or portion thereof which is occupied as, or designed or intended for occupancy as, a residence by one or more families, and any vacant land which is offered for sale or lease for the construction or location thereon of any such building, structure or portion thereof.
*Familial status* means one or more individuals (who have not attained the age of 18 years) being domiciled with— ( a ) A parent or another person having legal custody of such individual or individuals; or
( b ) The designee of such parent or other person having such custody, with the written permission of such parent or other person. The protections afforded against discrimination on the basis of familial status shall apply to any person who is pregnant or is in the process of securing legal custody of any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years.
*Handicap* is defined in § 100.201.
*Person* includes one or more individuals, corporations, partnerships, associations, labor organizations, legal representatives, mutual companies, joint-stock companies, trusts, unincorporated organizations, trustees, trustees in cases under title 11 U.S.C., receivers, and fiduciaries.
*Person in the business of selling or renting dwellings* means any person who: ( a ) Within the preceding twelve months, has participated as principal in three or more transactions involving the sale or rental of any dwelling or any interest therein;
( b ) Within the preceding twelve months, has participated as agent, other than in the sale of his or her own personal residence, in providing sales or rental facilities or sales or rental services in two or more transactions involving the sale or rental of any dwelling or any interest therein; or
( c ) Is the owner of any dwelling designed or intended for occupancy by, or occupied by, five or more families.
*State* means any of the several states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any of the territories and possessions of the United States.
[54 FR 3283, Jan. 23, 1989, as amended at 61 FR 5205, Feb. 9, 1996]
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2430 

To extend the duty reduction on ethylene/tetrafluoroethylene copolymer 

(ETFE). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2005 

Mr. MOLLOHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty reduction on ethylene/tetrafluoroethylene 

copolymer (ETFE). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHYLENE/TETRAFLUOROETHYLENE COPOLY4 MER (ETFE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.91 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 ethylene/tetrafluoroethylene copolymer (ETFE)) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2009’’. 
2 

•HR 2430 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 42
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 42 appear at 71 FR 34522, June 15, 2006.

§ 42.66 Medical examination. ( a ) *Medical examination required of all applicants.* Before the issuance of an immigrant visa, the consular officer shall require every alien, regardless of age, to undergo a medical examination in order to determine eligibility to receive a visa.
( b ) *Examination by physician from approved panel.* The required examination shall be conducted in accordance with requirements and procedures established by the United States Public Health Service and by a physician selected by the alien from a panel of physicians approved by the consular officer.
( c ) *Facilities required for panel physician.* A consular officer shall not include the name of a physician on the panel of physicians referred to in paragraph (b) of this section unless the physician has facilities to perform required serological and X-ray tests or is in a position to refer applicants to a qualified laboratory for such tests.
#### § 1508.640 May a settlement include a voluntary exclusion?

Yes, if we enter into a settlement with you in which you agree to be excluded, it is called a voluntary exclusion and has governmentwide effect.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2608

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Emamectin Benzoate Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Terry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Emamectin Benzoate Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMAMECTIN BENZOATE TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.90.13      Emamectin Benzoate  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Technical -                                                        31/2008
                         Avermectin B1,4-
                         deoxy-4-
                         (methylamino)-
                         ,(4R)-,benzoate
                         (salt) (CAS No.
                         155569-91-8)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2938.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Slip Op. 08-90

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE ALLIANCE, :

et al., :

 :

Plaintiffs, :

 :

v. : Before: Pogue, Judge

 : 

 : Consol. Ct. No. 05-00324

THE UNITED STATES, et al., :

 :

 :

Defendants. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

AMENDED JUDGMENT

This consolidated case having been duly submitted for

decision, and the Court, after due deliberation, having rendered

decisions herein; and

Said decisions having been appealed to the Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit; and 

Said appeal having resulted in a decision affirming-in-part,

vacating-in-part, and remanding, Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v.

United States, 517 F. 3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008); and

The Federal Circuit having issued its mandate after appeal;

The Court having issued judgment in accordance with said

mandate; and

The defendant having requested an amendment of said judgment

to further specify that the affirmance of the dismissal of the

Government of Canada’s complaint was for lack of standing; 

Now, in conformity with those decisions and mandate, it is

hereby

ORDERED that the motion of the Government of Canada for

judgment on the agency record is denied;

ORDERED that the motions of the Defendants and DefendantIntervenors for judgment on the agency record as against the

Government of Canada are granted;

ORDERED that the motion of the Canadian Wheat Board for

judgment on the agency record is granted;

ORDERED that the motions of the Defendant and DefendantIntervenors for summary judgment as against the Canadian Wheat

Board are denied;

ORDERED that the complaints of the Canadian Lumber Trade
Alliance, Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc., Ontario Forest Industries

Association, Ontario Lumber Manufacturers Association, and the Free

Trade Lumber Council are dismissed as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that the Government of Canada’s complaint is dismissed

for lack of standing; and it is further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that pursuant to Section 408 of

the North American Free Trade Implementation Act, 19 U.S.C. § 3438,

the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2002, 19 U.S.C. §

3438, does not apply to antidumping and countervailing duties

assessed on imports of goods from Canada or Mexico; and it is

further 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant W. Ralph Basham,

Commissioner of the United States Bureau of Customs and Border

Protection, his employees, officers, agents, attorneys, and

successors in office are permanently enjoined, as of July 14, 2006

from making any continued dumping and subsidy offsets, payments or

distributions, to affected domestic producers, as defined by 19

U.S.C. § 1675c (2005), to the extent they derive from duties

assessed pursuant to countervailing duty orders, antidumping duty

orders, or findings under the Antidumping Act of 1921, upon hard

red spring wheat from Canada imported into the United States. 

Dated: New York, New York

September 2, 2008

 /s/Donald C. Pogue 

Donald C. Pogue, Judge
Case 3:08-cv-01820-CRB Document 9 Filed 04/07/10 Page 1 of 2Case 3:08-cv-01820-CRB Document 9 Filed 04/07/10 Page 2 of 2
#### § 910.3 Board policy statements.

The Board may publish statements regarding policies it has established as to its operations and procedures.

[50 FR 31358, Aug. 2, 1985. Redesignated at 56 FR 55460, Oct. 28, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2627 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2627

  To require the Federal Trade Commission to monitor and investigate 
              gasoline prices under certain circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2005

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Federal Trade Commission to monitor and investigate 
              gasoline prices under certain circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INVESTIGATION OF GASOLINE PRICES.

    (a) In General.--If, based on weekly data published by the Energy 
Information Administration of the Department of Energy, the average 
price of regular grade gasoline in a State increases 20 percent or more 
for at least seven days during any 3-month period, the Federal Trade 
Commission shall initiate an investigation into the retail price of 
gasoline in that State to determine if the price of gasoline is being 
artificially manipulated by reducing refinery capacity or by any other 
form of manipulation.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 14 days after the initiation of the 
investigation described in subsection (a), the Federal Trade Commission 
shall report to Congress the results of the investigation.
    (c) Public Meeting.--Not later than 14 days after issuing the 
report described in subsection (b), the Federal Trade Commission shall 
hold a public hearing in the State in which the retail price of 
gasoline was investigated as described in subsection (a) for the 
purpose of presenting the results of the investigation.
    (d) Action on Price Increase.--
            (1) Finding of market manipulation.--If the Federal Trade 
        Commission determines that the increase in gasoline prices in a 
        State is a result of market manipulation, the Federal Trade 
        Commission shall, in cooperation with the Attorney General of 
        that State, take appropriate action.
            (2) No finding of market manipulation.--If the Federal 
        Trade Commission determines that the increase in gasoline 
        prices in a State is not the result of market manipulation, the 
        Federal Trade Commission shall notify the Secretary of Energy, 
        who shall, within 2 weeks of such notification, decide if the 
        Strategic Petroleum Reserve should be used to assure adequate 
        supplies of gasoline.
    (e) Termination.--This section shall cease to apply on the date 
that is 5 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2633 

To provide for preservation by the Department of Defense of historical 

radiation records. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2005 

Mr. MATHESON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for preservation by the Department of Defense 

of historical radiation records. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Defense 

5 Historical Radiation Records Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) Atmospheric testing of nuclear devices was 

9 a dark period in the history of the nation for many 

10 Americans, particularly ‘‘downwinders’’. 
2 

•HR 2633 IH 

1 (2) The National Academy of Sciences urged 

2 Congress to ‘‘declare a government-wide morato3 rium’’ on the destruction of documents that are po4 tentially relevant to measuring fallout in the United 

5 States from nuclear weapons testing and assessing 

6 health risks. 

7 (3) The National Academies of Science, in re8 viewing the feasibility of determining doses and 

9 health effects to the American population, noted that 

10 government data must be secured. 

11 (4) The Department of Energy has ordered a 

12 moratorium on the destruction of records, but the 

13 Department of Defense has no such prohibition and 

14 relevant records could potentially be lost. 

15 (5) The preservation of important historical 

16 records should be a priority. 

17 SEC. 3. PRESERVATION OF INFORMATION AND RECORDS 

18 PERTAINING TO RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT. 

19 (a) PROHIBITION OF DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN

20 DOCUMENTS.—The Secretary of Defense may not destroy 

21 any document in the custody or control of the Department 

22 of Defense that is a historical record (or part of a histor23 ical record) relating to radioactive fallout from the testing 

24 of any nuclear device. 
3 

•HR 2633 IH 

1 (b) PRESERVATION AND PUBLICATION OF INFORMA2 TION.—The Secretary of Defense shall identify, preserve, 

3 and publish information contained in documents referred 

4 to in subsection (a). 

5 (c) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—All government agencies 

6 should institute a moratorium on the destruction of histor7 ical fallout-related records and the Department of Defense 

8 should declassify those records for the benefit of scientific 

9 research and public health. 

Æ
#### Jill J. REGER; Jillmerica, LLC, Plaintiffs-counter-defendants-Appellees, v. Steve WERNER, Defendant-Appellant, and Fresh Bait, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant.

No. 05-56170.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2007 *.

Filed March 16, 2007.

Robert D. Feighner, Esq., Long Beach, CA, Bela G. Lugosi, Esq., Friedmann, O’Brien, Goldberg *&*Zarian, Devin A. Do-nohue, Esq., Palmer Lombardi Kneafsey and Donohue, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-counter-defendants-Appellees.

Steve Werner, Sherman Oaks, CA, pro se.

Steven M. Weinberg, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Patrick A. Connolly, III, Esq., Koletsky, Mancini, Feldman & Morrow, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-counter-claimant.

Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steve Werner appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Jill J. Reger and Jillmerica, LLC, in *545their action seeking declarative and injunc-tive relief in connection with the copyright of a fictional character named “Dipuc.” We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. E. & J. Gallo Winery,*150 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 1998), we affirm in part, and dismiss in part.

The district court properly granted Appellees summary adjudication on their claim for declaratory relief because Werner and Fresh Bait failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether any interest in the subject copyrights had been transferred to either defendant. *See*17 U.S.C. § 204(a); *Radio Television Espanola S.A. v. New World Entm’t, Ltd.,*183 F.3d 922, 926-28 (9th Cir.1999). Summary adjudication was also appropriate on Appellees’ claims for injunctive relief because a court may “grant temporary and final injunctions on such terms as it may deem reasonable to prevent or restrain infringement of a copyright.” 17 U.S.C. § 502(a).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Werner’s appeal of the dismissal of Fresh Bait’s counterclaims because corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an attorney. *See D-Beam Ltd. P’ship v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc.,*366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir .2004).

Werner’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED in part, DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

CORRECTED

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40095

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN DENNIS ARRASMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-76-CR-152-1

- - - - - - - - - -

July 6, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martin D. Arrasmith, federal prisoner #60757-080, seeks

leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) from the denial of his

motion seeking coram nobis relief from his 1976 federal drug

conviction. Arrasmith contends solely that the federal courts

lack jurisdiction over drug offenses that occur within the

states. Arrasmith’s contention is frivolous; his motion for
No. 

-2-

leave to proceed IFP is DENIED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d

215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.