alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

AsthmaChild CaregiversChild HealthChild WelfareChildhood NeedsChronic IllnessDiseasesHealth ServicesHigh Risk StudentsPreschool ChildrenPreschool EducationResource MaterialsSpecial Health ProblemsStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William McCann, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Child WelfareCrisis InterventionFamily EnvironmentFamily NeedsFamily ProblemsFamily School RelationshipHigh Risk StudentsPreschool ChildrenPreschool EducationResource MaterialsSafetySafety EducationStaff DevelopmentTraining MethodsWorkshops

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T19:25:30-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
### §6725. Statement of assurances as prerequisite for payments; rules governing time and manner of filing; contents of statement

Each State and unit of local government may receive payments under this subchapter only upon filing with the Secretary, at such time and in such manner as the Secretary prescribes by rule, a statement of assurances. Such rules shall be prescribed by the Secretary not later than ninety days after July 22, 1976. The Secretary may not require any State or local government to file more than one such statement during each fiscal year. Each such statement shall contain—

(1) an assurance that payments made under this subchapter to the State or local government will be used for the maintenance, to the extent practical, of levels of public employment and of basic services customarily provided to persons in that State or in the area under the jurisdiction of that unit of local government which is consistent with the provisions of section 6724 of this title;

(2) an assurance that the State or unit of local government will—

(A) use fiscal, accounting, and audit procedures which conform to guidelines established therefor by the Secretary (after consultation with the Comptroller General of the United States), and

(B) provide to the Secretary (and to the Comptroller General of the United States), on reasonable notice, access to, and the right to examine, such books, documents, papers, or records as the Secretary may reasonably require for purposes of reviewing compliance with this subchapter;

(3) an assurance that reasonable reports will be furnished to the Secretary in such form and containing such information as the Secretary may reasonably require to carry out the purposes of this subchapter and that such report shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction of such government unless the cost of such publication is excessive in relation to the amount of the payments received by such government under this subchapter or other means of publicizing such report is more appropriate, in which case such report shall be publicized pursuant to rules prescribed by the Secretary;

(4) an assurance that the requirements of section 6727 of this title will be complied with;

(5) an assurance that the requirements of section 6728 of this title will be complied with;

(6) an assurance that the requirements of section 6729 of this title will be complied with;

(7) an assurance that the State or unit of local government will spend any payment it receives under this subchapter before the end of the six-calendar-month period which begins on the day after the date on which such State or local government receives such payment; and

(8) an assurance that the State or unit of local government will spend amounts received under this subchapter only in accordance with the laws and procedures applicable to the expenditure of its own revenues.

(Pub. L. 94–369, title II, §205, July 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 1006.)
§ 9a.2 General policy. ( a ) The United States has entered into the Agreement on an International Energy Program of November 18, 1974, which created the International Energy Agency (IEA). This program is a substantial factor in the conduct of our foreign relations and an important element of our national security. The effectiveness of the Agreement depends significantly upon the provision and exchange of information and material by participants in advisory bodies created by the IEA. Confidentiality is essential to assure the free and open discussion necessary to accomplish the tasks assigned to those bodies.
( b ) These regulations establish procedures for the classification, declassification, storage, access, and dissemination of certain information related to the International Energy Program.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Biomarkers, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Ronald
R. Helm, Chief Executive Officer, and John P. Jensen, Vice President and
Controller, of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 15, 2010





/s/ Ronald R. HelmRonald
      R. Helm,Chief
      Executive Officer/s/ John P. JensenJohn
      P. JensenVice
      President and Controller
PUBLIC LAW 110–96—OCT. 16, 2007 121 STAT. 1011 

Public Law 110–96 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the penalty provisions in the International Emergency Economic Powers 

Act, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Emergency Economic Powers Enhancement Act’’. 

SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF IEEPA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 206 of the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705) is amended to read as 

follows: 

‘‘SEC. 206. PENALTIES. 

‘‘(a) UNLAWFUL ACTS.—It shall be unlawful for a person to 

violate, attempt to violate, conspire to violate, or cause a violation 

of any license, order, regulation, or prohibition issued under this 

title. 

‘‘(b) CIVIL PENALTY.—A civil penalty may be imposed on any 

person who commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) 

in an amount not to exceed the greater of— 

‘‘(1) $250,000; or 

‘‘(2) an amount that is twice the amount of the transaction 

that is the basis of the violation with respect to which the 

penalty is imposed. 

‘‘(c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—A person who willfully commits, willfully attempts to commit, or willfully conspires to commit, or aids 

or abets in the commission of, an unlawful act described in subsection (a) shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $1,000,000, 

or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than 20 

years, or both.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

(1) CIVIL PENALTIES.—Section 206(b) of the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended by subsection 

(a), shall apply to violations described in section 206(a) of 

such Act with respect to which enforcement action is pending 

or commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this 

Act. 

(2) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Section 206(c) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended by subsection (a), shall apply to violations described in section 206(a) 

Applicability. 

50 USC 1705 

note. 

International 

Emergency 

Economic Powers 

Enhancement 

Act. 

50 USC 1701 

note. 

Oct. 16, 2007 

[S. 1612] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
121 STAT. 1012 PUBLIC LAW 110–96—OCT. 16, 2007 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1612: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 110–82 (Comm. on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007): 

June 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Oct. 2, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

of such Act with respect to which enforcement action is commenced on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Approved October 16, 2007. 


dkrause on GSDDPC29 with PUBLIC LAWS
### §§2906a to 2907. Repealed. Pub. L. 93–386, §2(b), Aug. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 745

Section 2906a, Pub. L. 88–452, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §106(d)(3), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 711, prohibited financial assistance for relocation which would increase unemployment in the area of original location.

Section 2906b, Pub. L. 88–452, title IV, §406, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §106(d)(3), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 711, authorized Administrator to provide financial assistance for payment of costs of projects supplying technical and management assistance to eligible individuals and enterprises.

Section 2906c, Pub. L. 88–452, title IV, §407, as added Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §106(d)(3), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 712, authorized Administrator to insure that government contracts, subcontracts, and deposits are placed in such a way as to aid small business concerns.

Section 2907, Pub. L. 88–452, title IV, §408, formerly §407, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 527; renumbered §405 and amended Pub. L. 89–794, title IV, §§404, 406, Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1465; renumbered §408 and amended Pub. L. 90–222, title I, §106(d)(1), Dec. 23, 1967, 81 Stat. 711; Pub. L. 91–177, title I, §101(b), Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 827; Pub. L. 92–424, §2(a), Sept. 19, 1972, 86 Stat. 688, set forth the duration of the program as the eight succeeding fiscal years after the start of the program in the fiscal year ending June 30, 1967.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2630

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1927 Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, Illinois, as the ‘‘J.M. Dietrich 

Northeast Annex’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2005

Mr. LAHOOD (for himself, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. RUSH, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. 

WELLER, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. HYDE, Mr. 

EMANUEL, Mr. KIRK, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. SHIMKUS, 

Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. EVANS, Ms. BEAN, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mrs. 

BIGGERT, and Mr. MANZULLO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1927 Sangamon Avenue in Springfield, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘J.M. Dietrich Northeast Annex’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. J.M. DIETRICH NORTHEAST ANNEX. 

4 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

5 States Postal Service located at 1927 Sangamon Avenue 

6 in Springfield, Illinois, and known as the Northeast 
2

•HR 2630 IH 

1 Annex, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘J.M. 

2 Dietrich Northeast Annex’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘J.M. Dietrich North7 east Annex’’.

Æ
Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

G:\CRBALL\2009\08\Judgment.wpd

Uni

ted 

Stat

es D

istr

ict C

ourt

For t

he N

orth

ern 

Dis

trict

 of C

alifo

rnia

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLORIA WAGNER,

Plaintiff,

    v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner ofSocial Security,

Defendant.                                                                      /

No. C 09-0008 CRB

JUDGMENT

The Court, having granted Defendan’s Motion for Summary Judgment, enters

judgment in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 2, 2010                                                            CHARLES  R. BREYERUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00008-CRB   Document 22   Filed 03/02/10   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2018-03-13T05:53:21-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1


                                CEO CERTIFICATION

I, R. Greg Smith, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A of ERF Wireless, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: August 26, 2005


By:  /s/ R. Greg Smith
     -----------------
     R. Greg Smith
     Chief Executive Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)
cicn_ex41.htm


Exhibit 4.1


 


AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO


SHORT TERM CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE







This Amendment No. 2 to Short Term Convertible Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is made as of September 30, 2010, between Cicero Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and SOAdesk, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holder”).







W I T N E S S E T H:







WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2010, and amended on March 31, 2010, between the Company, Holder and Vertical Thought, Inc., the Company delivered to Holder a $525,000 principal amount Short Term Convertible Promissory Note, which Short Term Promissory Note was previously amended on June 30, 2010 (as so amended to date, the “Note”); and







WHEREAS, the Company and Holder desire to further amend the Note as set forth herein.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1.           Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Note.







2.           The “Maturity Date” of the Note is hereby extended to March 31, 2011, and the Holder hereby waives any and all Events of Default under the Note prior to the date hereof.







3.           Except as specifically set forth herein, the Note and all of its terms and conditions remain in full force and effect, and the Note is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, except that on or after the date of this Amendment all references in the Note to “this Note,” “hereto,” “hereof,” “hereunder,” or words of like import shall mean the Note as amended by this Amendment.







4.           This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument.







5.           This Amendment and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.


 


6.           This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto.


 


 



[remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page follows]


 




 




  





  











  






 



Exhibit 4.1




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


 




	 	CICERO INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: 	 
	 	 	Title: 	 
	 	 	 	 







 


 



	 	SOADESK, LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: 	 
	 	 	Title: 	 
	 	 	 	 





 


 



Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Short Term Convertible Promissory Note
### §7259. Use of facilities

#### (a) Facilities of United States and foreign governments

With their consent, the Secretary and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission may, with or without reimbursement, use the research, equipment, and facilities of any agency or instrumentality of the United States or of any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States, or of any political subdivision thereof, or of any foreign government, in carrying out any function now or hereafter vested in the Secretary or the Commission.

#### (b) Facilities under custody of Secretary

In carrying out his functions, the Secretary, under such terms, at such rates, and for such periods not exceeding five years, as he may deem to be in the public interest, is authorized to permit the use by public and private agencies, corporations, associations, or other organizations or by individuals of any real property, or any facility, structure, or other improvement thereon, under the custody of the Secretary for Department purposes. The Secretary may require permittees under this section to recondition and maintain, at their own expense, the real property, facilities, structures, and improvements involved to a satisfactory standard. This section shall not apply to excess property as defined in section 102(3) of title 40.

#### (c) Use of reimbursement proceeds

Proceeds from reimbursements under this section shall be deposited in the Treasury and may be withdrawn by the Secretary or the head of the agency or instrumentality of the United States involved, as the case may be, to pay directly the costs of the equipment, or facilities provided, to repay or make advances to appropriations or funds which do or will initially bear all or a part of such costs, or to refund excess sums when necessary, except that such proceeds may be credited to a working capital fund otherwise established by law, including the fund established pursuant to section 7263 of this title, and used under the law governing such fund, if the fund is available for use for providing the equipment or facilities involved.

(Pub. L. 95–91, title VI, §649, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 600.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (b), "section 102(3) of title 40" substituted for "section 3(e) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.
#### Morris Rubin et al., Respondents, v Staten Island University Hospital, Appellant.

[833 NYS2d 241]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated January 11, 2006, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

“To prove a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of a duty, a breach of that duty, and that the breach of such duty was a proximate cause of his or her injuries” *(Coral v State of New York,*29 AD3d 851, 851 [2006]; *see Alvino v Lin,*300 AD2d 421 [2002]). The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that its alleged delay in providing a wheelchair to the plaintiffs’ decedent was not a proximate cause of her injuries *(see generally Bank v Lincoln Shore Owners,*229 AD2d 370 [1996]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs’ contention that the decedent fell because she was weakened from the alleged long wait for a *619wheelchair is speculative *(see Hardman v Long Is. Urological Assoc.,*253 AD2d 849, 850 [1998]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
#### § 1000.214 What is the deadline for submission of an IHP?

IHPs must be initially sent by the recipient to the Area ONAP no later than 75 days before the beginning of a tribal program year. Grant funds cannot be provided until the plan due under this section is determined to be in compliance with section 102 of NAHASDA and funds are available.

[77 FR 71526, Dec. 3, 2012]
### §1973q. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1973q was editorially reclassified as section 10314 of Title 52, Voting and Elections.